1
00:00:05,240 --> 00:00:09,120
Speaker 1: Welcome in friends too, Fantasy Pros MLB. This is cleaning Up.

2
00:00:09,240 --> 00:00:12,959
Speaker 1: I'm Chris Welsh joined by Joe Rico. This is the

3
00:00:13,000 --> 00:00:15,920
Speaker 1: podcast that we do live on our Fantasy Pros discord.

4
00:00:16,320 --> 00:00:19,040
Speaker 1: You can check it out Fantasypros dot com, slash Chat.

5
00:00:19,239 --> 00:00:23,079
Speaker 1: You can join the free discord this show. Uh yeah,

6
00:00:23,079 --> 00:00:24,479
Speaker 1: this show is free. I was about to say no,

7
00:00:24,520 --> 00:00:26,360
Speaker 1: I was looking at the home run calls. This show

8
00:00:26,440 --> 00:00:28,880
Speaker 1: is free. Plenty of rooms are free join hang out

9
00:00:28,920 --> 00:00:32,000
Speaker 1: with the community. Plus we have a premium side with

10
00:00:32,080 --> 00:00:35,800
Speaker 1: some specific rooms like the home run calls, other sports.

11
00:00:35,800 --> 00:00:37,600
Speaker 1: There's just some stuff in there. Check it out for

12
00:00:37,640 --> 00:00:40,680
Speaker 1: yourself though, for the cost of free, and you can

13
00:00:40,720 --> 00:00:42,440
Speaker 1: be a part of this podcast hang out with us,

14
00:00:42,440 --> 00:00:45,080
Speaker 1: and then if you want to join premium you can

15
00:00:45,120 --> 00:00:47,479
Speaker 1: do so. We are live on the discord as well

16
00:00:47,680 --> 00:00:51,440
Speaker 1: to potentially answer questions from the audience. People can raise

17
00:00:51,440 --> 00:00:53,720
Speaker 1: their hand. If you ever wanted to be on the podcast,

18
00:00:54,120 --> 00:00:56,400
Speaker 1: you can come and join the discord. Raise your hand

19
00:00:56,440 --> 00:00:58,160
Speaker 1: and we will talk to you live, just like it's

20
00:00:58,200 --> 00:01:01,680
Speaker 1: old school radio. If not, we have a chat function

21
00:01:01,760 --> 00:01:04,080
Speaker 1: that people can live react to what we're doing in here,

22
00:01:04,400 --> 00:01:07,319
Speaker 1: can drop their questions and then we can answer them.

23
00:01:07,360 --> 00:01:09,160
Speaker 1: So you guys have a chance to dictate the show.

24
00:01:09,400 --> 00:01:12,720
Speaker 1: But we've also got some topics, don't we, mister Joe Rico.

25
00:01:12,840 --> 00:01:15,160
Speaker 1: We got prospects, we got stuff. How you doing, Buddy?

26
00:01:16,560 --> 00:01:17,520
Speaker 2: Doing very well? Man.

27
00:01:17,600 --> 00:01:20,520
Speaker 3: I think the baseball gods have been on our side recently,

28
00:01:20,600 --> 00:01:23,080
Speaker 3: because every Monday, it seems like we've got something. In

29
00:01:23,080 --> 00:01:25,880
Speaker 3: the last few weeks, Roman Anthony, the Drafael Devers trade,

30
00:01:25,880 --> 00:01:28,280
Speaker 3: and now we have another top prospect coming up, not

31
00:01:28,319 --> 00:01:30,840
Speaker 3: the one I think we were expecting to see first necessarily,

32
00:01:30,880 --> 00:01:33,760
Speaker 3: but a great pitching prospect going to be debuting this week.

33
00:01:33,920 --> 00:01:35,680
Speaker 1: Yeah, and that's kind of how we're going to start

34
00:01:35,720 --> 00:01:37,640
Speaker 1: out the show. Chase Burn's going to be making his

35
00:01:37,800 --> 00:01:41,959
Speaker 1: major league debut on Tuesday. And I have come the

36
00:01:42,040 --> 00:01:45,720
Speaker 1: thing that has come with Chase Burns has come the

37
00:01:45,800 --> 00:01:49,720
Speaker 1: full revelation. I said this on leading off. I actually

38
00:01:49,760 --> 00:01:53,560
Speaker 1: said this on ITL. I have come full circle. And

39
00:01:53,640 --> 00:01:57,520
Speaker 1: it's it's an l of the circle for me that

40
00:01:57,640 --> 00:02:00,080
Speaker 1: you can all these moves you can make at the

41
00:02:00,120 --> 00:02:02,880
Speaker 1: expense of Bubba Chandler at this point, because you were

42
00:02:02,920 --> 00:02:05,040
Speaker 1: alluding to the guy that we didn't expect. We've been

43
00:02:05,040 --> 00:02:08,120
Speaker 1: expecting Bubba Chandler week in and week out, and we've

44
00:02:08,160 --> 00:02:10,600
Speaker 1: had questions week in and week out, not just is

45
00:02:10,600 --> 00:02:13,320
Speaker 1: Bubba Chandler gonna come up, but would you drop Chandler

46
00:02:13,360 --> 00:02:17,880
Speaker 1: for dot dot dot? Last week that ended up being

47
00:02:17,919 --> 00:02:20,200
Speaker 1: like would you or maybe the week before, would you

48
00:02:20,240 --> 00:02:23,320
Speaker 1: drop Bubba Chandler for Jacob Mizerowski. And that's where like

49
00:02:24,200 --> 00:02:25,720
Speaker 1: maybe even you you might have been a little bit

50
00:02:25,720 --> 00:02:28,040
Speaker 1: more staunch about it like that you would. I've been

51
00:02:28,120 --> 00:02:30,040
Speaker 1: really on the fence because it's like, man, you've you

52
00:02:30,160 --> 00:02:33,120
Speaker 1: held on so long and I don't know, and you know,

53
00:02:33,160 --> 00:02:35,480
Speaker 1: you're talking about guys that have some questionable like long

54
00:02:35,560 --> 00:02:39,720
Speaker 1: term sustainability. But then like Miserowski comes out, throws over

55
00:02:39,760 --> 00:02:42,360
Speaker 1: two starts, eleven no hit innings and just has a

56
00:02:42,480 --> 00:02:46,480
Speaker 1: great in his second start. He's awesome. And then you've

57
00:02:46,480 --> 00:02:48,720
Speaker 1: got Chase Burns coming up. But they gave very little time.

58
00:02:48,880 --> 00:02:51,040
Speaker 1: They want to win, they're committed to that. Chase Burns

59
00:02:51,080 --> 00:02:53,079
Speaker 1: has maybe been the best pitching prospect in all the

60
00:02:53,120 --> 00:02:56,240
Speaker 1: baseball from a performance standpoint this year. And the third

61
00:02:56,240 --> 00:02:59,639
Speaker 1: piece of it, Joe, is that Bubba Chandler has stunk.

62
00:03:00,120 --> 00:03:03,160
Speaker 1: He has not gone three innings in three of his

63
00:03:03,240 --> 00:03:05,799
Speaker 1: last four starts in June, he has a ten era

64
00:03:06,040 --> 00:03:10,600
Speaker 1: in June. He's failing to go deep. He's still walking guys.

65
00:03:11,000 --> 00:03:13,960
Speaker 1: The command and inconsistency is all over the board, and

66
00:03:14,600 --> 00:03:19,480
Speaker 1: the pirates also stink. They stink, so why would they

67
00:03:19,520 --> 00:03:22,600
Speaker 1: press this up. He's got to prove a little bit more.

68
00:03:22,800 --> 00:03:24,919
Speaker 1: This isn't just like, oh, you know, Triple A kind

69
00:03:24,919 --> 00:03:28,520
Speaker 1: of got to him. So the question would you drop Bubba?

70
00:03:28,600 --> 00:03:32,320
Speaker 1: Would you drop Bubba Chandler for Chase Burns has been yes.

71
00:03:32,400 --> 00:03:33,959
Speaker 1: So I don't want to make this so much about

72
00:03:33,960 --> 00:03:37,200
Speaker 1: Bubba Chandler, But if I remember correctly the last couple

73
00:03:37,240 --> 00:03:38,960
Speaker 1: of weeks, you've been on the fence about that, I

74
00:03:38,960 --> 00:03:41,880
Speaker 1: think it's kind of a resounding. We would drop Bubba

75
00:03:41,960 --> 00:03:45,480
Speaker 1: Chandler for Misarowski Burns. We would drop Bubba Chandler for

76
00:03:45,520 --> 00:03:48,520
Speaker 1: guys like Jose Soriano, and that's, you know, with our luck,

77
00:03:48,560 --> 00:03:51,080
Speaker 1: Bubba Chandler get called up tomorrow, but he's stunk and

78
00:03:51,120 --> 00:03:51,920
Speaker 1: we can kind of move on.

79
00:03:54,200 --> 00:03:56,240
Speaker 3: I am kind of torn on this a little bit

80
00:03:56,320 --> 00:03:59,400
Speaker 3: because you know, the theory that I've seen some people

81
00:03:59,560 --> 00:04:02,440
Speaker 3: throw around recently is that Bubba's just kind of hit

82
00:04:02,520 --> 00:04:04,760
Speaker 3: the Wall just because he is a little bit frustrated

83
00:04:04,880 --> 00:04:05,960
Speaker 3: about not being called up.

84
00:04:05,960 --> 00:04:07,000
Speaker 2: He has nothing else to.

85
00:04:06,960 --> 00:04:09,640
Speaker 3: Really pitch for in the minor leagues, and I think

86
00:04:10,120 --> 00:04:13,520
Speaker 3: I've seen some people suggest that maybe he's just, you know,

87
00:04:14,080 --> 00:04:16,520
Speaker 3: not really excited to be pitching in Triple A anymore.

88
00:04:16,560 --> 00:04:18,520
Speaker 3: So it's maybe not that he's not giving his best effort,

89
00:04:18,520 --> 00:04:19,880
Speaker 3: but there might be something mental.

90
00:04:19,680 --> 00:04:22,279
Speaker 2: Going on there as well. I don't know that.

91
00:04:22,640 --> 00:04:24,360
Speaker 3: Like, if Bubba got called up, I think he'd still

92
00:04:24,400 --> 00:04:26,160
Speaker 3: be a huge priority. Like let's say we heard that

93
00:04:26,200 --> 00:04:29,400
Speaker 3: Bubba got called up tomorrow. Would it change your opinion

94
00:04:29,480 --> 00:04:30,760
Speaker 3: on him versus Burns at all?

95
00:04:30,880 --> 00:04:34,120
Speaker 1: No, No, it wouldn't. That's the other thing, Like I

96
00:04:34,200 --> 00:04:38,880
Speaker 1: get what you're saying, but I don't buy it as valid, Like, oh,

97
00:04:39,080 --> 00:04:41,520
Speaker 1: you're kind of bored and you don't like it will

98
00:04:41,560 --> 00:04:44,960
Speaker 1: still be good. Like to me, bored is you go

99
00:04:45,040 --> 00:04:47,880
Speaker 1: five innings, maybe you walk a couple guys, you give

100
00:04:47,960 --> 00:04:49,719
Speaker 1: up a couple earn runs. It's not that you go

101
00:04:49,800 --> 00:04:52,200
Speaker 1: two and two thirds of an inning. You don't you

102
00:04:52,240 --> 00:04:53,760
Speaker 1: fail to get to the third and three of the

103
00:04:53,800 --> 00:04:57,200
Speaker 1: four starts. That's not bored or not being challenged. And

104
00:04:57,240 --> 00:05:01,680
Speaker 1: it's very reminiscent of every bud He's questioned today and

105
00:05:01,760 --> 00:05:04,960
Speaker 1: over the weekend has been other Rutchman's on the io

106
00:05:05,240 --> 00:05:09,000
Speaker 1: Samuel Bosio time. No, it's not, and this is coming

107
00:05:09,000 --> 00:05:12,840
Speaker 1: from their coaching staff where they literally were asked, I'm

108
00:05:12,839 --> 00:05:16,479
Speaker 1: forgetting the guy's name now completely forgetting the name. That

109
00:05:16,520 --> 00:05:19,080
Speaker 1: they're like, is Besaio an option? And they said, we've

110
00:05:19,120 --> 00:05:21,920
Speaker 1: heard this, but no, what we want out of him

111
00:05:22,400 --> 00:05:26,200
Speaker 1: is to be dominant on all facets of the field,

112
00:05:26,520 --> 00:05:30,120
Speaker 1: and he hasn't even been a thought to them. And

113
00:05:30,160 --> 00:05:32,360
Speaker 1: I'm translating that to Bubba that I think it's kind

114
00:05:32,360 --> 00:05:34,760
Speaker 1: of the same thing. I think they want Bubba to.

115
00:05:35,360 --> 00:05:37,839
Speaker 1: Maybe in the very beginning of the year he did

116
00:05:37,920 --> 00:05:40,320
Speaker 1: kind of reach that and they missed an opportunity. But

117
00:05:40,400 --> 00:05:43,440
Speaker 1: then he's faded. What is he accomplishing right now? He's

118
00:05:43,560 --> 00:05:46,720
Speaker 1: not getting outs, he's not going deep into games, he's

119
00:05:46,760 --> 00:05:51,599
Speaker 1: not not walking players. You're not doing anything that's not bored.

120
00:05:52,000 --> 00:05:55,120
Speaker 1: That is a systemic problem. And maybe the pirates knew

121
00:05:55,120 --> 00:05:57,760
Speaker 1: that the whole time. Maybe it got activated in this

122
00:05:57,839 --> 00:06:00,520
Speaker 1: game of manipulation. I don't know what it is, but no,

123
00:06:00,560 --> 00:06:02,920
Speaker 1: Bubba Chandler doesn't look good right now I wouldn't feel

124
00:06:02,960 --> 00:06:06,920
Speaker 1: good after him. Like again, he's a ten era in June.

125
00:06:07,000 --> 00:06:10,359
Speaker 1: He's not gone. He's gone to the third inning once

126
00:06:10,480 --> 00:06:12,360
Speaker 1: in four starts. That's not going to make me feel

127
00:06:12,360 --> 00:06:14,640
Speaker 1: good about throwing him to the majors Right now, he

128
00:06:14,680 --> 00:06:18,960
Speaker 1: can get a little fastball slidery. So no, he's behind Misowski,

129
00:06:19,040 --> 00:06:21,359
Speaker 1: he's behind Chase Burns. It does not change if you

130
00:06:21,400 --> 00:06:24,080
Speaker 1: have the ability to hold him like sure, but it

131
00:06:24,120 --> 00:06:26,599
Speaker 1: has been at the expense of a lot of good stuff,

132
00:06:26,600 --> 00:06:31,120
Speaker 1: and unfortunately it was wrong. And I legitimately do not

133
00:06:31,279 --> 00:06:34,000
Speaker 1: think we now see Bubba Chandler until August, based on

134
00:06:34,080 --> 00:06:37,880
Speaker 1: what we're doing, based on futures game and the break

135
00:06:37,880 --> 00:06:41,040
Speaker 1: in between and him being behind and the walks and

136
00:06:41,040 --> 00:06:45,120
Speaker 1: this team sucking, and frankly, I think the best thing

137
00:06:45,160 --> 00:06:48,000
Speaker 1: they could do at this point is wait until September

138
00:06:48,040 --> 00:06:51,240
Speaker 1: so he doesn't lose prospect eligibility or graduation, and then

139
00:06:51,320 --> 00:06:52,880
Speaker 1: have him be in the rotation at the start of

140
00:06:52,920 --> 00:06:55,880
Speaker 1: next year so they can compete for a PPI first

141
00:06:55,960 --> 00:06:58,080
Speaker 1: round pick the following season, because what else are they

142
00:06:58,120 --> 00:06:59,760
Speaker 1: accomplishing when he has stunk so bad?

143
00:07:02,040 --> 00:07:05,360
Speaker 3: Yeah, I think you're probably correct there. I wonder if

144
00:07:05,360 --> 00:07:07,200
Speaker 3: something would change if you got called up. But I

145
00:07:07,240 --> 00:07:09,280
Speaker 3: think to your point as well, they're not going to

146
00:07:09,360 --> 00:07:11,640
Speaker 3: be in a huge hurry at this point. There're seventeen

147
00:07:11,720 --> 00:07:15,040
Speaker 3: games under five hundred. You know, I can't remember exactly

148
00:07:15,080 --> 00:07:17,480
Speaker 3: where they were in the standings when Skeins got called up,

149
00:07:17,480 --> 00:07:19,880
Speaker 3: But Skeens didn't have any of those real struggles at

150
00:07:19,880 --> 00:07:21,800
Speaker 3: Triple A, so it's a little bit of a different situation.

151
00:07:21,880 --> 00:07:23,360
Speaker 2: So I think I'm probably with you.

152
00:07:23,440 --> 00:07:27,520
Speaker 3: There is there anybody else you think that warrant, like

153
00:07:27,520 --> 00:07:29,960
Speaker 3: if you have one of those minor league stash spots,

154
00:07:30,000 --> 00:07:31,880
Speaker 3: like who would be the top stash at this point

155
00:07:31,920 --> 00:07:32,520
Speaker 3: if not Bubba?

156
00:07:32,560 --> 00:07:35,320
Speaker 1: Still so uh And and I know we got a

157
00:07:35,360 --> 00:07:37,560
Speaker 1: hand raised in the queue and a couple questions we're

158
00:07:37,560 --> 00:07:39,520
Speaker 1: gonna hit in a second. It's a great question. We

159
00:07:39,560 --> 00:07:42,840
Speaker 1: did the prospect segment today. I almost wanted to kill

160
00:07:42,840 --> 00:07:45,760
Speaker 1: the prospect segment today and maybe for a couple of

161
00:07:45,800 --> 00:07:47,960
Speaker 1: weeks because A I think we're in a really bad

162
00:07:48,000 --> 00:07:49,760
Speaker 1: time leading up to the All Star break, but B

163
00:07:50,760 --> 00:07:53,240
Speaker 1: I think the majority of the guys are up. I

164
00:07:53,240 --> 00:07:57,080
Speaker 1: think the guy when you talk about stash, the words stashing,

165
00:07:57,960 --> 00:08:01,840
Speaker 1: it's specific. Sometimes we in those videos about here guys

166
00:08:01,840 --> 00:08:04,240
Speaker 1: to pay attention to, and Da da da. But the

167
00:08:04,280 --> 00:08:09,520
Speaker 1: degrees of what's worth stashing is not equated equally. And

168
00:08:10,120 --> 00:08:12,000
Speaker 1: we've gotten so many of the guys that have been

169
00:08:12,000 --> 00:08:15,600
Speaker 1: interesting and so many of the big players. There's only

170
00:08:15,760 --> 00:08:19,040
Speaker 1: one player to me outside of it, okay two, if

171
00:08:19,040 --> 00:08:21,880
Speaker 1: you want to count Bubba into that. The only other

172
00:08:21,920 --> 00:08:25,000
Speaker 1: one that's really worth stashing is Andrew Painter, and I

173
00:08:25,000 --> 00:08:28,080
Speaker 1: think I would take Painter over Bubba right now. Painter

174
00:08:28,160 --> 00:08:31,920
Speaker 1: has had thirty almost forty innings in Triple A. It's

175
00:08:31,920 --> 00:08:34,760
Speaker 1: been a little bit of a waffy start, but he's

176
00:08:34,760 --> 00:08:37,200
Speaker 1: got a great four pitch arsenal. I've seen him in play.

177
00:08:37,200 --> 00:08:40,440
Speaker 1: He's a major league pitcher. But there's nobody out. The

178
00:08:40,480 --> 00:08:43,240
Speaker 1: closest next is Bryce Eldridge as a hitter. And then

179
00:08:43,240 --> 00:08:47,320
Speaker 1: you're talking about a crew of players that aren't stash worthy.

180
00:08:47,600 --> 00:08:50,640
Speaker 1: Then you're talking about Chase the latter, who is not

181
00:08:50,720 --> 00:08:53,080
Speaker 1: worth stashing, but if he gets called up, he probably

182
00:08:53,080 --> 00:08:57,080
Speaker 1: would be worth picking up. So the idea of stashing

183
00:08:57,240 --> 00:09:00,800
Speaker 1: is pretty far gone. I'm not advocating to just dump

184
00:09:00,920 --> 00:09:02,880
Speaker 1: Bubba Chanler for no reason, but if he's taking up

185
00:09:02,920 --> 00:09:05,320
Speaker 1: a bench spot, right now, I would rather that bench

186
00:09:05,320 --> 00:09:07,719
Speaker 1: spot go to Andrew Painter, or I'd rather go to

187
00:09:07,760 --> 00:09:10,640
Speaker 1: another guy, because I'm really concerned about what this is

188
00:09:11,280 --> 00:09:12,760
Speaker 1: and maybe this will be the fire at the end

189
00:09:12,760 --> 00:09:15,120
Speaker 1: of the day to light it up. But I'm I'm

190
00:09:15,200 --> 00:09:17,520
Speaker 1: kind of out, I'm kind of out on one waiting

191
00:09:17,559 --> 00:09:19,160
Speaker 1: for this right now. And there's always a rookiear two

192
00:09:19,160 --> 00:09:21,600
Speaker 1: that does this to us. You know, Hell, Jenna Camenarow

193
00:09:21,640 --> 00:09:22,920
Speaker 1: did this in the first half last year. It took

194
00:09:22,960 --> 00:09:24,600
Speaker 1: him forever to come up, and we're like, he's coming,

195
00:09:24,600 --> 00:09:27,160
Speaker 1: He's coming. It just always happens, and it happened to

196
00:09:27,200 --> 00:09:29,959
Speaker 1: be Bubba. This got turned into more of a Bubba

197
00:09:30,040 --> 00:09:33,960
Speaker 1: thing real quick. Before we turn the subject here, let's

198
00:09:33,960 --> 00:09:36,960
Speaker 1: do a prediction on Chase Burns's line. This is actually

199
00:09:37,000 --> 00:09:39,320
Speaker 1: a tough matchup against the Yankees. It is at home

200
00:09:39,400 --> 00:09:42,960
Speaker 1: in Cincinnati, but you got the Yankees here. Prediction on

201
00:09:43,000 --> 00:09:46,360
Speaker 1: the line, and do you think Chase Burns is a

202
00:09:46,480 --> 00:09:48,840
Speaker 1: season stashable guy, Like, do you think this is going

203
00:09:48,920 --> 00:09:51,240
Speaker 1: to be short lived if like Hunter Green comes back,

204
00:09:51,559 --> 00:09:53,439
Speaker 1: or do you think this move keeps him in the

205
00:09:53,520 --> 00:09:55,880
Speaker 1: rotation for the majority of the season. Obviously, unless he

206
00:09:56,000 --> 00:09:56,800
Speaker 1: like implodes.

207
00:09:58,040 --> 00:09:58,560
Speaker 2: Yeah, a lot of.

208
00:09:58,559 --> 00:10:00,880
Speaker 3: It will be performance based, but I think that he

209
00:10:01,040 --> 00:10:04,840
Speaker 3: is probably fairly safe. I wonder what the leash is

210
00:10:04,840 --> 00:10:07,720
Speaker 3: going to be on Brady Singer because he hasn't really

211
00:10:07,760 --> 00:10:09,560
Speaker 3: been good outside of the early part of the season,

212
00:10:09,600 --> 00:10:12,679
Speaker 3: and also Nick Martinez. They started using him in relief

213
00:10:12,760 --> 00:10:14,800
Speaker 3: the last couple of outings because he's been pretty poor

214
00:10:14,840 --> 00:10:16,520
Speaker 3: as well. So I think there is an avenue for

215
00:10:16,600 --> 00:10:19,720
Speaker 3: him to stay in the rotation going forward. In terms

216
00:10:19,720 --> 00:10:21,760
Speaker 3: of a line prediction, I don't know if they've said

217
00:10:21,800 --> 00:10:24,520
Speaker 3: anything about a particular pitch count, but I'd imagine this

218
00:10:24,600 --> 00:10:31,160
Speaker 3: is probably something like four innings, six strikeouts, a couple

219
00:10:31,200 --> 00:10:34,200
Speaker 3: of walks, two or three earned runs, something like that.

220
00:10:34,720 --> 00:10:36,920
Speaker 1: We're pretty close. Yeah, I haven't heard anything of like

221
00:10:36,960 --> 00:10:38,840
Speaker 1: what the pitch count is going to be. I feel

222
00:10:38,840 --> 00:10:41,240
Speaker 1: like it's going to be in the eighty five pitch range,

223
00:10:41,600 --> 00:10:44,800
Speaker 1: maybe ninety. I'm gonna go five innings, I'm gonna go

224
00:10:44,840 --> 00:10:48,920
Speaker 1: six strikeouts. I'm gonna say three earned runs, one homer.

225
00:10:49,200 --> 00:10:51,640
Speaker 1: He's going to give up. But you know, we're closing

226
00:10:51,679 --> 00:10:54,160
Speaker 1: in on that quality start territory. I think he belongs

227
00:10:54,200 --> 00:10:57,040
Speaker 1: in the same discussion as Jacob Misarowski, as does Painter.

228
00:10:57,440 --> 00:10:59,960
Speaker 1: Nobody else really outside of Bobba. Nobody else really did

229
00:11:00,080 --> 00:11:02,360
Speaker 1: do in that discussion, and that's why it's kind of

230
00:11:02,360 --> 00:11:05,560
Speaker 1: the dog days of prospects. You know, they're like, there's

231
00:11:05,640 --> 00:11:08,160
Speaker 1: no double A guy that looks like they're gonna happen.

232
00:11:08,200 --> 00:11:10,480
Speaker 1: All the triple A guys are kind of up, so

233
00:11:11,240 --> 00:11:14,400
Speaker 1: the stashing market is pretty low. But that also all

234
00:11:14,400 --> 00:11:16,160
Speaker 1: of this to be said. To wrap that up, that

235
00:11:16,280 --> 00:11:19,160
Speaker 1: might be why if you have the ability to hold

236
00:11:19,160 --> 00:11:20,760
Speaker 1: onto bubb but it might be worth it because there

237
00:11:20,800 --> 00:11:22,480
Speaker 1: will when he is called up, there will be a

238
00:11:22,520 --> 00:11:24,640
Speaker 1: fight for it. It's just I think it's going to

239
00:11:24,679 --> 00:11:27,360
Speaker 1: be quieter and I'm probably gonna be a little bit

240
00:11:27,360 --> 00:11:29,360
Speaker 1: more picky about what that first start looks like. But

241
00:11:29,640 --> 00:11:31,199
Speaker 1: I truly do think it's going to be a while,

242
00:11:31,600 --> 00:11:34,840
Speaker 1: and I think Jase Burns is going to have not

243
00:11:34,920 --> 00:11:37,800
Speaker 1: a Miserowski like five innings, no hit type of line.

244
00:11:38,320 --> 00:11:40,240
Speaker 1: I think it's a tough Yankees team, but I think

245
00:11:40,280 --> 00:11:42,600
Speaker 1: you're going to see some pretty decent success with his

246
00:11:42,679 --> 00:11:46,400
Speaker 1: pitch arsenal very early on. So be careful, though, be

247
00:11:46,400 --> 00:11:49,160
Speaker 1: careful about starting him against the Yankees in general. That's

248
00:11:49,200 --> 00:11:51,280
Speaker 1: kind of scary again. Friends, You guys can come and

249
00:11:51,360 --> 00:11:55,600
Speaker 1: check us out at Fantasypros dot Com slash chat completely

250
00:11:55,800 --> 00:11:59,360
Speaker 1: brain farted there to come and hang out Mondays five

251
00:11:59,440 --> 00:12:02,280
Speaker 1: pm for this live show that we do every single

252
00:12:02,320 --> 00:12:05,120
Speaker 1: week that you guys can come and hang with us,

253
00:12:05,320 --> 00:12:07,080
Speaker 1: hang with the rest of the crew, hang with the

254
00:12:07,120 --> 00:12:09,800
Speaker 1: rest of the people, join up all the rooms Fantasypros

255
00:12:09,840 --> 00:12:12,280
Speaker 1: dot Com, slash Chat. We would love to have you all. Right,

256
00:12:12,360 --> 00:12:14,360
Speaker 1: let's get to some of the questions. I think we

257
00:12:14,480 --> 00:12:18,400
Speaker 1: lost our hands here, but let's start with solely NRFI

258
00:12:19,080 --> 00:12:23,440
Speaker 1: the NURFE. Do we like Cam Smith or Addison Barger?

259
00:12:23,960 --> 00:12:26,319
Speaker 1: Rest of season? Cam Smith moving up in the order.

260
00:12:26,679 --> 00:12:28,760
Speaker 1: He's been on an ice little hot streak. Barger has

261
00:12:28,800 --> 00:12:30,760
Speaker 1: been pretty ridiculous. This is gonna be a tough one

262
00:12:30,800 --> 00:12:33,680
Speaker 1: for you, Joey. But what do you think Barger or

263
00:12:33,720 --> 00:12:34,280
Speaker 1: Cam Smith?

264
00:12:36,320 --> 00:12:39,320
Speaker 3: I think they're both super super viable just because of

265
00:12:39,360 --> 00:12:41,320
Speaker 3: how bad third base is. If I had to just

266
00:12:41,400 --> 00:12:44,960
Speaker 3: pick one, I'd probably go with Barger. And the main

267
00:12:45,040 --> 00:12:48,240
Speaker 3: reason is that he has already gone through his initial

268
00:12:48,400 --> 00:12:50,320
Speaker 3: struggle phase at the major league level.

269
00:12:50,360 --> 00:12:53,280
Speaker 2: He was up last year. He was terrible.

270
00:12:53,320 --> 00:12:55,880
Speaker 3: He was awful last season, had to go back down

271
00:12:55,960 --> 00:12:58,200
Speaker 3: work on a few things, and now he is seems

272
00:12:58,240 --> 00:13:00,439
Speaker 3: to have hit his stride, where with Cam Smith there

273
00:13:00,440 --> 00:13:01,839
Speaker 3: have been a few ups and downs, but I don't

274
00:13:01,840 --> 00:13:03,880
Speaker 3: know if he's really necessarily hit that wall that I

275
00:13:03,920 --> 00:13:05,720
Speaker 3: expect a lot of rookies to hit at some point

276
00:13:05,840 --> 00:13:08,760
Speaker 3: go through some struggles, not necessarily like Christian Campbell level

277
00:13:08,760 --> 00:13:11,559
Speaker 3: where they have to get sent down, but I expect that.

278
00:13:11,559 --> 00:13:13,720
Speaker 2: Smith will eventually stumble a little bit.

279
00:13:13,760 --> 00:13:15,960
Speaker 3: He's striking out still a little bit too much for

280
00:13:16,040 --> 00:13:19,600
Speaker 3: my liking twenty seven percent. It's not terrible for a rookie,

281
00:13:19,640 --> 00:13:21,160
Speaker 3: but I just think that Barger is a little bit

282
00:13:21,160 --> 00:13:22,319
Speaker 3: more polished at this point.

283
00:13:22,440 --> 00:13:24,440
Speaker 1: Well, Cam Smith did go through it, dude. I mean

284
00:13:24,480 --> 00:13:27,160
Speaker 1: he hit won twenty five in March to twenty four

285
00:13:27,160 --> 00:13:30,760
Speaker 1: in April, so he was walking into May as a

286
00:13:31,000 --> 00:13:34,240
Speaker 1: sub to twenty hitter and questions about him being sent down,

287
00:13:34,320 --> 00:13:36,600
Speaker 1: and then he picked it up and he hit three

288
00:13:36,640 --> 00:13:38,600
Speaker 1: oh seven in May and two seventy five in June.

289
00:13:38,640 --> 00:13:40,200
Speaker 1: But I mean he literally even if he account March,

290
00:13:40,240 --> 00:13:41,440
Speaker 1: he had two twenty four in April.

291
00:13:42,400 --> 00:13:44,640
Speaker 3: Yeah, he was a ninety five WRC plus at March.

292
00:13:44,640 --> 00:13:46,640
Speaker 3: In April, so he was like a little bit below average,

293
00:13:46,640 --> 00:13:48,920
Speaker 3: but it wasn't like startlingly bad.

294
00:13:48,960 --> 00:13:49,640
Speaker 2: He was okay.

295
00:13:49,720 --> 00:13:53,040
Speaker 3: The batting average is not great, but I think overall

296
00:13:53,080 --> 00:13:55,760
Speaker 3: it was still not a bad offensive out, but he

297
00:13:55,800 --> 00:13:58,000
Speaker 3: was still walking. He definitely picked it up in May,

298
00:13:58,040 --> 00:14:01,160
Speaker 3: won thirty WRC plus one eleven in June. But I

299
00:14:01,280 --> 00:14:04,319
Speaker 3: just feel like there is a point for just about

300
00:14:04,360 --> 00:14:07,280
Speaker 3: every single rookie where they will go through their one

301
00:14:07,320 --> 00:14:09,280
Speaker 3: for twenty five phase or something like that, and I

302
00:14:09,320 --> 00:14:11,439
Speaker 3: just feel like Barger's kind of put that behind him.

303
00:14:11,480 --> 00:14:13,920
Speaker 2: I think it's very close. I think it's very close.

304
00:14:13,920 --> 00:14:16,480
Speaker 3: Both of the lineups are about equal in terms of

305
00:14:16,559 --> 00:14:18,440
Speaker 3: the overall output, I think, but I would.

306
00:14:18,200 --> 00:14:21,080
Speaker 2: Just slightly lean towards Barger. It's yeah, very close.

307
00:14:21,080 --> 00:14:23,200
Speaker 1: Though by the way, I'm agreeing with you. My choice

308
00:14:23,240 --> 00:14:25,520
Speaker 1: is Barger here, but I just disagree with like the

309
00:14:25,680 --> 00:14:28,080
Speaker 1: cam Smith hasn't gone through it like Cam Smith did

310
00:14:28,080 --> 00:14:30,320
Speaker 1: go through it one hundred percent, went through it and

311
00:14:30,360 --> 00:14:32,920
Speaker 1: he got out of it. But does that mean there's

312
00:14:32,920 --> 00:14:36,000
Speaker 1: not another one coming there? Definitely could be. I think

313
00:14:36,200 --> 00:14:39,360
Speaker 1: this is very close. It's the hitting profile of Barger,

314
00:14:39,440 --> 00:14:41,720
Speaker 1: and then maybe like to your point, like Barger hasn't

315
00:14:41,760 --> 00:14:45,240
Speaker 1: really gone through it. But if you're banking on the profile,

316
00:14:45,480 --> 00:14:48,720
Speaker 1: fourteen percent barrel over fifty percent hard hit rate. He's

317
00:14:48,880 --> 00:14:51,960
Speaker 1: lowered to strikeouts over last year, which is really great.

318
00:14:52,280 --> 00:14:54,080
Speaker 1: You know, he's getting the ball in the air, he's

319
00:14:54,120 --> 00:14:57,320
Speaker 1: pulling the ball a ton more. I very much like

320
00:14:57,440 --> 00:14:59,640
Speaker 1: what Barger's doing. There's a little bit more stolen base

321
00:14:59,640 --> 00:15:02,840
Speaker 1: equity in Cam Smith. I think it's very, very close,

322
00:15:02,880 --> 00:15:05,160
Speaker 1: and Cam Smith belongs in the discussion, but I would

323
00:15:05,200 --> 00:15:07,120
Speaker 1: go Barger with you. And then Sully had asked, would

324
00:15:07,120 --> 00:15:10,000
Speaker 1: you drop Josh Smith for Barger? Yes, I think we

325
00:15:10,080 --> 00:15:10,840
Speaker 1: both agree.

326
00:15:10,640 --> 00:15:14,840
Speaker 3: Right, Yeah, Josh Smith has been so good and he's

327
00:15:14,840 --> 00:15:17,960
Speaker 3: eligible everywhere, and he's just he's really a solid, well

328
00:15:18,040 --> 00:15:18,640
Speaker 3: rounded guy.

329
00:15:18,720 --> 00:15:20,600
Speaker 2: But I think you'd have to go with Barger there.

330
00:15:20,760 --> 00:15:24,720
Speaker 1: I completely agree. All right, always over, invite, always over on.

331
00:15:24,760 --> 00:15:28,840
Speaker 1: That's where the hand was on the podcast. Maybe what's up?

332
00:15:28,840 --> 00:15:29,360
Speaker 1: Always over?

333
00:15:30,840 --> 00:15:31,440
Speaker 2: What's that? Man?

334
00:15:31,480 --> 00:15:31,960
Speaker 4: Can you hear me?

335
00:15:32,800 --> 00:15:33,000
Speaker 2: Yeah?

336
00:15:33,080 --> 00:15:34,120
Speaker 1: Keep going a little bit louder.

337
00:15:34,160 --> 00:15:36,080
Speaker 4: We got you all right?

338
00:15:36,880 --> 00:15:38,200
Speaker 2: What're about now? Yeah?

339
00:15:38,240 --> 00:15:39,520
Speaker 1: Yeah, we're good. We're good.

340
00:15:39,800 --> 00:15:42,600
Speaker 4: Okay. So I just have a question because like I'm

341
00:15:42,600 --> 00:15:46,360
Speaker 4: in a Yahoo Fantacy league and I'm stuck with Goldschmidt,

342
00:15:47,320 --> 00:15:51,200
Speaker 4: Nick Kuragey, Christian Walker, and I really need some more pictures.

343
00:15:51,280 --> 00:15:54,760
Speaker 4: It's kind of a you know, could I should I

344
00:15:54,840 --> 00:15:55,520
Speaker 4: drop Walker?

345
00:15:55,680 --> 00:15:56,520
Speaker 2: So I've tried.

346
00:15:56,320 --> 00:16:00,280
Speaker 4: Trading them from almost anybody within reasonable and no by.

347
00:16:00,240 --> 00:16:03,240
Speaker 1: You trying to get your mouth close to the phone,

348
00:16:03,400 --> 00:16:06,920
Speaker 1: it's breaking up a little bit. Or wherever you're talking,

349
00:16:08,320 --> 00:16:09,080
Speaker 1: can you hear me better?

350
00:16:09,120 --> 00:16:09,280
Speaker 2: Now?

351
00:16:09,320 --> 00:16:13,520
Speaker 1: Oh buddy, now you're now you're on the podcast? Yes, absolutely,

352
00:16:13,560 --> 00:16:15,960
Speaker 1: so you you you got the three first basement we

353
00:16:16,040 --> 00:16:19,520
Speaker 1: heard you're looking at pitching and you're looking at dropping Walker.

354
00:16:19,640 --> 00:16:21,560
Speaker 1: What are the decisions or choices.

355
00:16:23,120 --> 00:16:23,920
Speaker 4: Like who to add?

356
00:16:24,240 --> 00:16:24,480
Speaker 2: Yeah?

357
00:16:24,520 --> 00:16:26,440
Speaker 1: Is that way? Do you have any names against? Or

358
00:16:26,480 --> 00:16:28,280
Speaker 1: is that the question should you drop Walker for?

359
00:16:28,440 --> 00:16:30,800
Speaker 2: Yeah? Yeah?

360
00:16:30,880 --> 00:16:33,120
Speaker 4: So, I mean like it's it's really just gold Schmid,

361
00:16:33,240 --> 00:16:37,080
Speaker 4: Nick Kurtz or Walker? You know Jacob? Was it Jacob

362
00:16:37,080 --> 00:16:40,920
Speaker 4: Blowpez the athletics picture? I really like him, he's looking good?

363
00:16:42,040 --> 00:16:43,520
Speaker 4: Or should it just like hold on his hand?

364
00:16:44,480 --> 00:16:45,600
Speaker 1: What is man?

365
00:16:46,800 --> 00:16:47,080
Speaker 2: Yeah?

366
00:16:47,480 --> 00:16:51,640
Speaker 1: Yeah, twelve man? Okay, even better? I would It's a

367
00:16:51,640 --> 00:16:53,720
Speaker 1: good it's a great question. The first part of the

368
00:16:53,760 --> 00:16:56,840
Speaker 1: question most important thing. Can you cut bait on Christian Walker?

369
00:16:56,840 --> 00:17:00,800
Speaker 1: If you have Goldie and Nick Kurtz. Yeah. I think

370
00:17:00,840 --> 00:17:04,040
Speaker 1: a general question at this point is I don't trust

371
00:17:04,040 --> 00:17:07,680
Speaker 1: Why do I trust Walker anymore? If you have needs

372
00:17:07,680 --> 00:17:10,960
Speaker 1: in other spots. I don't think the pitching sounds like

373
00:17:10,960 --> 00:17:14,399
Speaker 1: it's super awesome, But like I would go emmage in

374
00:17:14,600 --> 00:17:18,320
Speaker 1: over Jacob Lopez, and I would cut Christian Walker for

375
00:17:18,440 --> 00:17:20,800
Speaker 1: some stream of able type of pitchers I had saw

376
00:17:21,240 --> 00:17:24,080
Speaker 1: that he had also put in the chat, like lower

377
00:17:24,280 --> 00:17:28,040
Speaker 1: Jacob Lopez. I'm not sure who. I'm guessing that's Edward Cabrera.

378
00:17:28,040 --> 00:17:32,160
Speaker 1: Would you cut Christian Walker for any of those guys, Joe, I.

379
00:17:32,080 --> 00:17:34,400
Speaker 2: Don't think you really need him necessarily now.

380
00:17:34,440 --> 00:17:36,199
Speaker 3: One thing I will say about Christian Walker is that

381
00:17:36,240 --> 00:17:37,959
Speaker 3: there are still a lot of things I'd like in

382
00:17:38,000 --> 00:17:38,560
Speaker 3: his profile.

383
00:17:38,600 --> 00:17:39,600
Speaker 2: He's still got a good launching.

384
00:17:39,800 --> 00:17:42,840
Speaker 3: It still hits the ball hard twelve percent barrel forty

385
00:17:42,840 --> 00:17:45,520
Speaker 3: six percent hard hit rate. You know, he's underperforming a

386
00:17:45,560 --> 00:17:47,600
Speaker 3: lot of his expected numbers. I think he will turn

387
00:17:47,640 --> 00:17:50,480
Speaker 3: it around. But considering your first base situation, he is

388
00:17:50,600 --> 00:17:53,639
Speaker 3: probably the most viable drop there. I just none of

389
00:17:53,680 --> 00:17:55,960
Speaker 3: those names that you mentioned are terribly exciting in a

390
00:17:56,080 --> 00:17:59,040
Speaker 3: Yahoo unless it's a deeper roster, like unless your commissioner

391
00:17:59,080 --> 00:18:02,320
Speaker 3: added pitcher spots. G N can be dropped. Lopez is

392
00:18:02,359 --> 00:18:05,720
Speaker 3: probably ring in that sense, and I think the same

393
00:18:05,760 --> 00:18:08,840
Speaker 3: thing for Cabrera. They're more so streaming types than must

394
00:18:08,960 --> 00:18:11,800
Speaker 3: roster players. I agree that at Walker is probably the

395
00:18:11,880 --> 00:18:14,000
Speaker 3: drop there, but I you know, are there any other

396
00:18:14,080 --> 00:18:15,720
Speaker 3: names on that waiver wire? Because none of those guys

397
00:18:15,720 --> 00:18:16,560
Speaker 3: are really exciting to me.

398
00:18:16,720 --> 00:18:17,320
Speaker 2: I agree with that.

399
00:18:17,440 --> 00:18:19,560
Speaker 1: I think if I were to do any maybe it's

400
00:18:19,560 --> 00:18:22,000
Speaker 1: Walker for Cabrera, but I think he's a little bit

401
00:18:22,000 --> 00:18:25,200
Speaker 1: more streamy. Let me present this to you, then he's

402
00:18:25,280 --> 00:18:28,280
Speaker 1: I think he's had said in the beginning, like Paul Goldschmidt,

403
00:18:28,320 --> 00:18:32,440
Speaker 1: he's not getting any any bites. Would you put Nick

404
00:18:32,480 --> 00:18:35,600
Speaker 1: Kurts out there? Is he? You know everyone's talking about

405
00:18:35,680 --> 00:18:39,000
Speaker 1: Kurds the nine homers in fifteen days. He's hot if

406
00:18:39,040 --> 00:18:41,680
Speaker 1: you think Christian Walker can bounce back, And I do agree,

407
00:18:41,720 --> 00:18:45,000
Speaker 1: the profile looks That's been my struggle with him all

408
00:18:45,000 --> 00:18:48,560
Speaker 1: season long, is the profile just looks the same as

409
00:18:48,600 --> 00:18:50,359
Speaker 1: it always does. I mean, he is striking out a

410
00:18:50,400 --> 00:18:53,800
Speaker 1: tiny bit more, but everything from expected batting average to

411
00:18:53,840 --> 00:18:57,480
Speaker 1: barrel and I'm getting frustrated because it's like two plus

412
00:18:57,520 --> 00:18:59,399
Speaker 1: months of this. What are we supposed to do, but

413
00:18:59,480 --> 00:19:01,960
Speaker 1: it does look like it's starting to kind of click back.

414
00:19:02,359 --> 00:19:05,600
Speaker 1: If you believed in Christian Walker, do you think it's

415
00:19:05,600 --> 00:19:07,840
Speaker 1: a better move to trade Nick Kurts He's probably the

416
00:19:07,840 --> 00:19:09,560
Speaker 1: hottest of name value in there for an.

417
00:19:09,680 --> 00:19:12,800
Speaker 2: SP Yeah, I don't mind it.

418
00:19:12,840 --> 00:19:14,760
Speaker 3: Like I think that you could probably do pretty well

419
00:19:14,800 --> 00:19:17,200
Speaker 3: for Nick Kurtz, depending on you know, if you kick

420
00:19:17,240 --> 00:19:19,439
Speaker 3: the tires around enough in your league, you could probably

421
00:19:19,440 --> 00:19:20,640
Speaker 3: do pretty well on him.

422
00:19:21,119 --> 00:19:22,119
Speaker 2: Just worry a little.

423
00:19:21,840 --> 00:19:24,399
Speaker 3: Bit, like if you trade Kurtz and then if Walker

424
00:19:24,560 --> 00:19:26,600
Speaker 3: just happens to not turn it around. Let's say he's

425
00:19:26,640 --> 00:19:28,399
Speaker 3: kind of hit the wall and he just he is

426
00:19:28,440 --> 00:19:29,879
Speaker 3: what he is at this point, which I still think

427
00:19:29,880 --> 00:19:31,840
Speaker 3: there's a chance he turns it around, but for argument's sake,

428
00:19:31,920 --> 00:19:35,040
Speaker 3: let's say he doesn't and you're stuck with Walker and

429
00:19:35,080 --> 00:19:38,440
Speaker 3: gold Schmidt. And gold Schmid has entered into what looks

430
00:19:38,480 --> 00:19:41,080
Speaker 3: to be a pretty legitimate short side platoon there with

431
00:19:41,160 --> 00:19:43,560
Speaker 3: Ben Rice at first base. He's been sitting against right

432
00:19:43,600 --> 00:19:47,000
Speaker 3: handed pitching over the last week, so he's been really good.

433
00:19:47,000 --> 00:19:48,359
Speaker 3: But if he's not going to play and you're stuck

434
00:19:48,400 --> 00:19:50,119
Speaker 3: with Goldschmid and Walker, that might put you in a

435
00:19:50,119 --> 00:19:52,159
Speaker 3: bit of a pickle at first base if Walker or

436
00:19:52,200 --> 00:19:54,119
Speaker 3: Goldschmidt doesn't, you know, pick things back up again, and

437
00:19:54,119 --> 00:19:55,919
Speaker 3: they're both kind of old to expect a lot out

438
00:19:55,960 --> 00:19:56,640
Speaker 3: of at this point.

439
00:19:56,440 --> 00:19:59,560
Speaker 1: Point always raise the hand again. Was there a follow

440
00:19:59,640 --> 00:19:59,959
Speaker 1: up to that?

441
00:20:00,040 --> 00:20:01,119
Speaker 2: Yeah?

442
00:20:01,160 --> 00:20:03,199
Speaker 4: I don't. Did y'all hear the pictures?

443
00:20:03,200 --> 00:20:03,680
Speaker 2: I was listening.

444
00:20:04,280 --> 00:20:08,440
Speaker 1: Uh no, well you you wrote like lower Edward Cabrera

445
00:20:08,520 --> 00:20:11,600
Speaker 1: and then what are the options any others?

446
00:20:11,080 --> 00:20:13,680
Speaker 4: So, like I said, I don't know if you heard

447
00:20:13,680 --> 00:20:15,240
Speaker 4: it was on the phone. I can't really want to speaker.

448
00:20:15,280 --> 00:20:24,199
Speaker 4: But Gildo Morton, Jeffrey Springs, Sevarino, you know.

449
00:20:24,320 --> 00:20:28,840
Speaker 1: Co Walker for Gilito right now. Geildo has been dicey,

450
00:20:28,920 --> 00:20:32,560
Speaker 1: but three straight really good starts. He figured out this

451
00:20:32,840 --> 00:20:35,760
Speaker 1: and thank you for the question. By the way, they'd

452
00:20:35,760 --> 00:20:40,240
Speaker 1: figured out rotationally, like where his release point was was

453
00:20:40,280 --> 00:20:43,440
Speaker 1: a problem they with the four seam, and then once

454
00:20:43,480 --> 00:20:45,520
Speaker 1: they fixed that, you saw the velo come up a

455
00:20:45,560 --> 00:20:49,080
Speaker 1: mile prour and he's had good success. I would dump

456
00:20:49,520 --> 00:20:54,720
Speaker 1: Walker for Gilito outside of exploring a potential. Nick Kurtz

457
00:20:55,040 --> 00:20:57,480
Speaker 1: higher named Pitcher, but you're probably not going to get

458
00:20:57,480 --> 00:20:59,920
Speaker 1: the value of it. Would you drop Walker for you?

459
00:21:01,520 --> 00:21:03,240
Speaker 2: I think of the names listed.

460
00:21:04,200 --> 00:21:05,560
Speaker 3: Just looking at it, I think I might go with

461
00:21:05,680 --> 00:21:07,600
Speaker 3: Eric Lauer just as a streamer for this week. He's

462
00:21:07,640 --> 00:21:09,720
Speaker 3: got two starts, the first one against Cleveland, who have

463
00:21:09,800 --> 00:21:13,360
Speaker 3: been awful, second worst offense in June behind the Pirates,

464
00:21:13,359 --> 00:21:15,240
Speaker 3: and then on the weekend he gets to face the

465
00:21:15,280 --> 00:21:18,440
Speaker 3: Red Sox, who just lost the rather significant piece of

466
00:21:18,480 --> 00:21:20,600
Speaker 3: their lineup as well. So and Lower has been pitching

467
00:21:20,720 --> 00:21:22,760
Speaker 3: really well this year, so I think I may for

468
00:21:22,840 --> 00:21:24,440
Speaker 3: the time being, if you can't pull off a trade,

469
00:21:24,480 --> 00:21:26,120
Speaker 3: I might use that as a streaming spot and pick

470
00:21:26,160 --> 00:21:27,200
Speaker 3: up the two step for lour.

471
00:21:27,880 --> 00:21:31,680
Speaker 1: There you go, good good stuff there, love it, Ay,

472
00:21:31,800 --> 00:21:36,480
Speaker 1: it's our it's our boy. Mctunda mcdundah, what's up brother

473
00:21:36,520 --> 00:21:39,119
Speaker 1: and mctunda also another thing that you can do, just

474
00:21:39,119 --> 00:21:42,119
Speaker 1: to mention, just like mctunda did. A way you can

475
00:21:42,160 --> 00:21:45,520
Speaker 1: get some access. I believe it might even be to

476
00:21:45,880 --> 00:21:49,640
Speaker 1: full premium discord is through Twitch. If you guys get

477
00:21:49,680 --> 00:21:53,439
Speaker 1: a sub on our twitch, Twitch dot Tv, Slash Fantasy Pros,

478
00:21:54,000 --> 00:21:56,920
Speaker 1: Joe Piece of PM, myself are live every single day

479
00:21:57,160 --> 00:22:00,719
Speaker 1: Monday through Friday, twelve pm Eastern. We've got other content

480
00:22:00,760 --> 00:22:03,960
Speaker 1: on there. We're gonna have content all season long we

481
00:22:04,040 --> 00:22:06,119
Speaker 1: do you know, some of the extra other great shows

482
00:22:06,119 --> 00:22:08,240
Speaker 1: and other sports and whatnot. But if you grab a

483
00:22:08,280 --> 00:22:10,280
Speaker 1: sub which you can do for free with an Amazon

484
00:22:10,320 --> 00:22:12,840
Speaker 1: Prime account, it gets sort of ads and you can

485
00:22:12,880 --> 00:22:15,280
Speaker 1: also get access, I believe to the Twitch because it

486
00:22:15,280 --> 00:22:18,639
Speaker 1: even says under mctuonda Twitch subscription. So check that out today.

487
00:22:18,680 --> 00:22:21,320
Speaker 1: Support Fantasy pros there, get that subscription mctonda.

488
00:22:21,880 --> 00:22:25,880
Speaker 2: What up? Hey, how's it going? I'm in a ten

489
00:22:25,960 --> 00:22:27,119
Speaker 2: team head to head league?

490
00:22:27,119 --> 00:22:31,959
Speaker 1: There? Do I continue to just keep rolling Austin Riley?

491
00:22:32,160 --> 00:22:35,040
Speaker 3: Or I have Nolan Ronado as well as well too,

492
00:22:35,160 --> 00:22:37,240
Speaker 3: so do I just stick with kind of?

493
00:22:37,320 --> 00:22:40,200
Speaker 2: Ronado has been kind of more consistent, as.

494
00:22:40,040 --> 00:22:45,600
Speaker 1: In like you're benching Riley for Aeronaudo or what? Yeah, okay, Well,

495
00:22:45,800 --> 00:22:49,320
Speaker 1: I mean Riley's hitting two seventy two on the season,

496
00:22:49,359 --> 00:22:53,359
Speaker 1: He's got twelve homers. He's hitting two sixty three this month.

497
00:22:54,040 --> 00:22:56,880
Speaker 1: He's not like he doesn't look like the second ish

498
00:22:57,040 --> 00:22:59,840
Speaker 1: round pick, but he's got a higher average and he

499
00:22:59,840 --> 00:23:02,560
Speaker 1: had last year. He looks like he's pacing out full

500
00:23:02,600 --> 00:23:05,680
Speaker 1: season stat wise to at least still be a twenty

501
00:23:05,720 --> 00:23:08,600
Speaker 1: five homer guy if he doesn't jump into it profile

502
00:23:08,640 --> 00:23:10,520
Speaker 1: like we talked about with Walker kind of looks the

503
00:23:10,560 --> 00:23:14,119
Speaker 1: same outstead of a few more strikeouts. I'm pretty big

504
00:23:14,359 --> 00:23:17,159
Speaker 1: team Austin Riley still, if you, I guess, if you

505
00:23:17,160 --> 00:23:20,119
Speaker 1: wanted to play matchups, I'm not super excited about Nolan

506
00:23:20,320 --> 00:23:23,600
Speaker 1: Aernatto regardless, But Arico, what do you think? Are you

507
00:23:23,640 --> 00:23:25,720
Speaker 1: still comfortable with are you do you have any worries

508
00:23:25,720 --> 00:23:26,960
Speaker 1: about Riley? I guess.

509
00:23:28,520 --> 00:23:30,680
Speaker 3: Really, I mean, looking at the last month, over the

510
00:23:30,720 --> 00:23:33,680
Speaker 3: last thirty days, Riley's hitting two seventy one he scored

511
00:23:33,720 --> 00:23:36,360
Speaker 3: twenty one runs, four homers, and in the same time

512
00:23:36,400 --> 00:23:40,199
Speaker 3: period Aeronato hitting two fifty five five homers. It's not

513
00:23:40,400 --> 00:23:42,080
Speaker 3: too far off in terms of the stat line. But

514
00:23:42,080 --> 00:23:44,000
Speaker 3: I think I do trust Riley more. If you wanted

515
00:23:44,000 --> 00:23:46,760
Speaker 3: to play, you know, day to day, week to week matchups,

516
00:23:46,760 --> 00:23:48,359
Speaker 3: I guess that would be okay. But I definitely have

517
00:23:48,440 --> 00:23:51,320
Speaker 3: a lot more confidence in Riley going forward. This week,

518
00:23:51,720 --> 00:23:55,320
Speaker 3: the Cardinals are facing the Cubs and then Cleveland, so

519
00:23:55,440 --> 00:23:57,800
Speaker 3: there's some decent pitching matchups mixed in there, and then

520
00:23:57,840 --> 00:24:02,879
Speaker 3: Atlanta's got the Mets with Burn Mantas Holmes canning, and

521
00:24:02,920 --> 00:24:05,320
Speaker 3: then they're facing the Phillies later in the week. A

522
00:24:05,320 --> 00:24:07,639
Speaker 3: couple of lefties in there as well, so i'd probably

523
00:24:07,680 --> 00:24:08,560
Speaker 3: start Riley this week.

524
00:24:08,640 --> 00:24:08,840
Speaker 2: Still.

525
00:24:08,880 --> 00:24:11,840
Speaker 1: Honestly, yeah, I think I kind of agree. I'm just

526
00:24:12,119 --> 00:24:15,200
Speaker 1: I'm there. That's that's what I'm doing with Austin Riley.

527
00:24:15,240 --> 00:24:17,720
Speaker 1: I'm holding tight. You want to play any pitching matchups,

528
00:24:17,760 --> 00:24:20,040
Speaker 1: you can. But I think this is like the third

529
00:24:20,240 --> 00:24:23,240
Speaker 1: Austin rally thing I've seen as a recent I kind

530
00:24:23,240 --> 00:24:25,639
Speaker 1: of think Austin Riley might be a bye. You know,

531
00:24:25,800 --> 00:24:28,440
Speaker 1: if you're having the question and a couple other people

532
00:24:28,440 --> 00:24:30,880
Speaker 1: are having the question, I think from a market standpoint

533
00:24:30,880 --> 00:24:32,600
Speaker 1: out there, maybe you can go and look around at

534
00:24:32,600 --> 00:24:37,800
Speaker 1: Austin Riley owners. I mean, Ronald Acunya, the tide lifts

535
00:24:37,800 --> 00:24:38,720
Speaker 1: all ships?

536
00:24:38,800 --> 00:24:39,720
Speaker 2: Is that right? Is that?

537
00:24:40,840 --> 00:24:41,000
Speaker 3: Is that?

538
00:24:41,080 --> 00:24:45,240
Speaker 1: Roughly? Cising boats say.

539
00:24:45,080 --> 00:24:48,400
Speaker 3: It something like that, A rising tide lifts all boats.

540
00:24:48,440 --> 00:24:51,399
Speaker 2: I think, yeah, you're wrong. That's going to get me

541
00:24:51,400 --> 00:24:52,120
Speaker 2: to do a Welsh.

542
00:24:52,359 --> 00:24:54,880
Speaker 1: Yeah that thing right there. I think Ronald Acunya makes

543
00:24:54,880 --> 00:24:58,560
Speaker 1: everybody else just a little bit better. Uh it's yeah,

544
00:24:58,600 --> 00:25:02,760
Speaker 1: close enough, but not quite Elshism. Mctnda's I almost had it,

545
00:25:02,800 --> 00:25:05,000
Speaker 1: so it doesn't quite fly. I'll tell you guys of

546
00:25:05,000 --> 00:25:08,320
Speaker 1: this right now. This is an Easter egg for this show.

547
00:25:09,400 --> 00:25:15,560
Speaker 1: If you want to watch Joe Pisipia laugh, ask him

548
00:25:15,920 --> 00:25:19,720
Speaker 1: about I did a welshism in a meeting last week

549
00:25:20,440 --> 00:25:25,640
Speaker 1: that almost put him on the floor, and hindsight, when

550
00:25:25,640 --> 00:25:28,320
Speaker 1: I think back on it, it's it was really bad.

551
00:25:28,640 --> 00:25:31,080
Speaker 1: It was a really bad one. I'm not gonna say

552
00:25:31,080 --> 00:25:33,719
Speaker 1: it here. I'm shocked that Joe never brought it up

553
00:25:33,800 --> 00:25:36,520
Speaker 1: up the next day. Maybe thinks I would have been

554
00:25:36,520 --> 00:25:40,040
Speaker 1: annoy I really don't care, but I did one. It

555
00:25:40,080 --> 00:25:45,320
Speaker 1: was It's a popular saying and Mayor and him both

556
00:25:45,400 --> 00:25:48,080
Speaker 1: started dying. Mayor had to say something about it. Joe

557
00:25:48,119 --> 00:25:50,440
Speaker 1: lost it and never said anything about it. We haven't

558
00:25:50,440 --> 00:25:55,960
Speaker 1: talked about it since. It's probably from a from a

559
00:25:56,040 --> 00:26:00,960
Speaker 1: me getting saying's wrong standpoint top five. It's fantastic. So yeah,

560
00:26:01,000 --> 00:26:03,040
Speaker 1: if you guys can get it out of Joe Piezapia

561
00:26:03,280 --> 00:26:05,520
Speaker 1: on leading off, there's your Easter egg to do that,

562
00:26:05,560 --> 00:26:07,520
Speaker 1: because I'm shocked he never brought it up, but that

563
00:26:07,560 --> 00:26:08,400
Speaker 1: was pretty close to him.

564
00:26:08,800 --> 00:26:10,200
Speaker 2: I'll do that on Thursday. We'll try.

565
00:26:10,280 --> 00:26:14,120
Speaker 1: Oh I forgot yeah when I'm not here, great, thank you. Yeah,

566
00:26:14,119 --> 00:26:16,080
Speaker 1: if it doesn't happen sooner, all right, let's get to

567
00:26:16,119 --> 00:26:18,840
Speaker 1: some other questions that were in the chat. Here. Now

568
00:26:18,920 --> 00:26:21,320
Speaker 1: the big dance is O'Neil Cruz a fair trade offer? Oh,

569
00:26:21,400 --> 00:26:24,199
Speaker 1: for Austin Riley? Look at that, it's a ten team

570
00:26:24,840 --> 00:26:29,400
Speaker 1: Rodo keeper. So I guess I can't. I guess he's

571
00:26:29,520 --> 00:26:35,040
Speaker 1: offering O'Neill Cruz to get Austin Riley. I'm still weirdly

572
00:26:36,160 --> 00:26:38,679
Speaker 1: very much about O'Neal Cruise, even though the batting average

573
00:26:38,680 --> 00:26:42,520
Speaker 1: has just struggled this year to eleven. God, his counting

574
00:26:42,520 --> 00:26:46,560
Speaker 1: stats are so loud. His XBA is like twenty five

575
00:26:46,680 --> 00:26:51,440
Speaker 1: points higher. The strikeouts are really killing me because guys,

576
00:26:51,640 --> 00:26:57,320
Speaker 1: every other category, for the most part, is so much higher.

577
00:26:57,840 --> 00:27:02,560
Speaker 1: Barrel ridiculous, twenty three percent at average, xivelocity best in

578
00:27:02,600 --> 00:27:06,800
Speaker 1: the league, max ex velocity best in the league, Wolbacon

579
00:27:07,359 --> 00:27:09,639
Speaker 1: one of the best in the league, hard hit best

580
00:27:09,640 --> 00:27:14,120
Speaker 1: in the league, fourteen percent walker. He is so ridiculous

581
00:27:14,440 --> 00:27:17,280
Speaker 1: on that, but he's striking out like crazy and really

582
00:27:17,280 --> 00:27:19,960
Speaker 1: struggling with batting average. I gotta be honest with you,

583
00:27:20,119 --> 00:27:23,880
Speaker 1: I probably still prefer O'Neal Cruz, which leads to me saying, yeah,

584
00:27:23,880 --> 00:27:26,400
Speaker 1: it's a fair trade. Cruises really struggle from a batting

585
00:27:26,400 --> 00:27:32,000
Speaker 1: average standpoint Riley. What you consider a Riley season is

586
00:27:32,040 --> 00:27:36,240
Speaker 1: like a two eighty thirty homers, ninety five ninety five.

587
00:27:36,560 --> 00:27:39,320
Speaker 1: So if that's what you want, I think that's fair.

588
00:27:39,720 --> 00:27:43,080
Speaker 1: Oneal Cruz has a little bit of like it could

589
00:27:43,080 --> 00:27:46,320
Speaker 1: be anything. It could be two twenty with twenty homers

590
00:27:46,320 --> 00:27:49,080
Speaker 1: and forty stolen bases, or it could be two seventy

591
00:27:49,160 --> 00:27:51,640
Speaker 1: with thirty homers and sixty stolen bases, or it could

592
00:27:51,680 --> 00:27:56,200
Speaker 1: fall apart. I just I prefer the upside and volatility

593
00:27:56,240 --> 00:27:58,120
Speaker 1: of Cruise over Riley. But I think it's pretty fair.

594
00:27:58,160 --> 00:27:58,720
Speaker 1: What do you think?

595
00:28:00,359 --> 00:28:03,440
Speaker 3: Yeah, I'm just looking at a couple of different dynasty lists,

596
00:28:03,720 --> 00:28:07,639
Speaker 3: like our consensus dynasty rankings. It's Cruz twenty six, Riley

597
00:28:07,680 --> 00:28:11,879
Speaker 3: twenty eight. Another really prominent member of the industry has

598
00:28:12,280 --> 00:28:15,040
Speaker 3: Cruise at twenty six and Riley at thirty one. This

599
00:28:15,480 --> 00:28:18,400
Speaker 3: feels fairly even to me. I don't have a huge

600
00:28:18,400 --> 00:28:19,600
Speaker 3: problem going either way on it.

601
00:28:20,200 --> 00:28:22,560
Speaker 1: I do to This is a great question that uh

602
00:28:22,840 --> 00:28:25,920
Speaker 1: pig Bird pig Bird jet fan who says it came

603
00:28:25,960 --> 00:28:31,240
Speaker 1: from football, But you asked what pitcher had the best

604
00:28:31,480 --> 00:28:37,280
Speaker 1: fantasy season ever. It's a great question. I'm trying to

605
00:28:37,320 --> 00:28:39,840
Speaker 1: look this up to see if I can find.

606
00:28:39,600 --> 00:28:42,600
Speaker 2: It well, to give me a second.

607
00:28:42,800 --> 00:28:45,800
Speaker 1: Yeah, well, I'm looking this. Well, here's one thing. Is

608
00:28:45,880 --> 00:28:50,160
Speaker 1: this like I seeing guys from like best Fantasy. This

609
00:28:50,200 --> 00:28:53,400
Speaker 1: is from like the nineteen oh eight that doesn't count here,

610
00:28:53,640 --> 00:28:55,160
Speaker 1: I'm trying to see if they can give me any

611
00:28:55,200 --> 00:28:57,560
Speaker 1: other players who comes to mind just real quick while

612
00:28:57,560 --> 00:28:58,360
Speaker 1: I'm looking this up.

613
00:29:00,560 --> 00:29:01,560
Speaker 2: And let's still like.

614
00:29:01,440 --> 00:29:04,520
Speaker 1: Those thirty years by the way, because like just for reference,

615
00:29:04,560 --> 00:29:10,080
Speaker 1: someone's this article is like Christy Matthewson in nineteen oh eight,

616
00:29:10,160 --> 00:29:13,600
Speaker 1: Like nobody cares about that. The old the most recent

617
00:29:13,680 --> 00:29:17,640
Speaker 1: pitchers were Eric Ganie and Sandy Kofax. Like, let's think

618
00:29:17,680 --> 00:29:20,640
Speaker 1: of the next the last like thirty years.

619
00:29:20,560 --> 00:29:23,720
Speaker 3: Eric ganye, wow, as a reliever, I'm surprised. So I'm

620
00:29:23,760 --> 00:29:26,800
Speaker 3: looking at the ras ball has a historical player Raider,

621
00:29:27,320 --> 00:29:30,200
Speaker 3: and according to them, the greatest season ever by a

622
00:29:30,240 --> 00:29:34,480
Speaker 3: starting pitcher was nineteen ninety nine Pedro Martinez thirteen and

623
00:29:34,520 --> 00:29:37,680
Speaker 3: a third two hundred and thirteen and a third innings,

624
00:29:37,760 --> 00:29:41,800
Speaker 3: twenty three wins, two oh seven ERA point nine to

625
00:29:41,800 --> 00:29:45,600
Speaker 3: two whip, three hundred and thirteen strikeouts in the height

626
00:29:45,640 --> 00:29:47,440
Speaker 3: of the steroid in the height of the steroid era,

627
00:29:47,520 --> 00:29:50,160
Speaker 3: And actually number two is also from the same season,

628
00:29:50,240 --> 00:29:51,479
Speaker 3: Randy Johnson ninety nine.

629
00:29:51,560 --> 00:29:53,640
Speaker 2: Randy Johnson with your boys out there in the desert?

630
00:29:53,880 --> 00:29:55,280
Speaker 1: How uh.

631
00:29:56,600 --> 00:29:56,800
Speaker 4: Is it?

632
00:29:56,840 --> 00:29:58,160
Speaker 1: How far back is this tracked?

633
00:30:00,000 --> 00:30:03,080
Speaker 2: Goes back to nineteen oh three?

634
00:30:03,320 --> 00:30:05,160
Speaker 1: Okay, so here's where I get a little bit lost.

635
00:30:05,480 --> 00:30:08,520
Speaker 1: I'm not surprised people don't realize how great Pedro was.

636
00:30:08,560 --> 00:30:11,560
Speaker 1: That three hundred strikeout season is ridiculous. If I'm thinking

637
00:30:11,680 --> 00:30:15,160
Speaker 1: top five, I feel like Nolan Ryan would be three

638
00:30:15,200 --> 00:30:17,240
Speaker 1: of the top five. Am I wrong? Is he in

639
00:30:17,280 --> 00:30:21,400
Speaker 1: one of the top five seasons in strikeouts alone?

640
00:30:23,480 --> 00:30:26,160
Speaker 3: Maybe it was a ratio thing. I'm scrolling the highest

641
00:30:26,280 --> 00:30:28,480
Speaker 3: rated season. They have him as the forty third best

642
00:30:28,480 --> 00:30:30,640
Speaker 3: pitching season of all time nineteen seventy three.

643
00:30:30,680 --> 00:30:31,239
Speaker 1: What did he do?

644
00:30:32,440 --> 00:30:35,800
Speaker 3: Three hundred and twenty six innings? He had twenty one

645
00:30:35,840 --> 00:30:40,920
Speaker 3: wins to eighty seven ERA, three hundred and eighty three strikeout.

646
00:30:40,480 --> 00:30:43,200
Speaker 2: No, here's hold him back? How is hold him? Yeah?

647
00:30:43,200 --> 00:30:45,320
Speaker 1: How is that the forty third best season?

648
00:30:46,560 --> 00:30:48,680
Speaker 2: One twenty three whip? I think that's what did him in.

649
00:30:49,360 --> 00:30:50,000
Speaker 2: No way.

650
00:30:50,480 --> 00:30:52,760
Speaker 1: I almost cursed. You almost made me curse there for

651
00:30:52,840 --> 00:30:56,440
Speaker 1: I woul show we were on almost four hundred strikeouts,

652
00:30:56,480 --> 00:31:00,280
Speaker 1: thirteen innings and twenty plus wins. Is the forty third

653
00:31:00,480 --> 00:31:02,840
Speaker 1: best pitching fantasy season ever.

654
00:31:04,960 --> 00:31:07,360
Speaker 3: I mean, when you're going they're just drawing from such

655
00:31:07,360 --> 00:31:10,320
Speaker 3: a big sample size, right, Like there's guys going back

656
00:31:10,360 --> 00:31:12,760
Speaker 3: to what's the earliest.

657
00:31:12,400 --> 00:31:16,000
Speaker 1: Like the math year is that Roto points this.

658
00:31:16,120 --> 00:31:18,960
Speaker 2: Is four five by five standard Roto.

659
00:31:19,400 --> 00:31:22,680
Speaker 1: I don't understand anything. Then that's that was roughly. I mean,

660
00:31:22,680 --> 00:31:24,240
Speaker 1: you have to resay it because I could be wrong.

661
00:31:24,280 --> 00:31:28,000
Speaker 1: That was more strikeouts. There were almost as many wins

662
00:31:28,600 --> 00:31:31,040
Speaker 1: right as the Pedros was in.

663
00:31:31,960 --> 00:31:34,000
Speaker 3: It was a two eighty seven era, so the era

664
00:31:34,160 --> 00:31:35,080
Speaker 3: difference is almost a.

665
00:31:35,080 --> 00:31:36,680
Speaker 2: Run, okay a little bit the whip.

666
00:31:37,160 --> 00:31:39,480
Speaker 3: The whip is a difference of one twenty three to

667
00:31:39,960 --> 00:31:42,720
Speaker 3: zero point ninety two, So that that's kind of sure.

668
00:31:42,440 --> 00:31:46,320
Speaker 1: That's dramatic. But what were the strikeouts and win differential?

669
00:31:47,720 --> 00:31:50,680
Speaker 3: So three eighty three for Nolan in terms of strikeouts

670
00:31:50,760 --> 00:31:54,960
Speaker 3: and it was three thirteen for Pedro, and Pedro edged him.

671
00:31:54,840 --> 00:31:56,920
Speaker 2: Out by two wins twenty three to twenty one.

672
00:31:57,080 --> 00:32:01,120
Speaker 1: I just like what I want to see that in

673
00:32:01,160 --> 00:32:04,000
Speaker 1: a points perspective, that's like seventy more strikeouts and two

674
00:32:04,080 --> 00:32:07,560
Speaker 1: less wins. The math doesn't quite math to me. I

675
00:32:07,560 --> 00:32:10,280
Speaker 1: guess if you are valuation in Rodo, it's like, yeah,

676
00:32:10,320 --> 00:32:15,240
Speaker 1: that's a pretty underperforming whip. But I don't know. Great

677
00:32:15,280 --> 00:32:18,600
Speaker 1: question though maybe I'm totally off there. But three hundred innings,

678
00:32:18,640 --> 00:32:21,560
Speaker 1: almost four hundred strikeouts, twenty something wins, Like, I don't

679
00:32:21,560 --> 00:32:24,200
Speaker 1: know what to do there. But Pedro was absolutely incredible

680
00:32:24,800 --> 00:32:26,840
Speaker 1: and I like it. Joe just shared the link in

681
00:32:26,880 --> 00:32:29,080
Speaker 1: our chat. So actually, one thing you can do. You

682
00:32:29,120 --> 00:32:30,720
Speaker 1: come over to the discord. You can click on the

683
00:32:30,760 --> 00:32:33,680
Speaker 1: cleaning up room. You can see the questions, and you

684
00:32:33,680 --> 00:32:36,040
Speaker 1: can see the link for the Player Raider Best Seasons

685
00:32:36,040 --> 00:32:38,560
Speaker 1: of all time, which is one hundred percent going to

686
00:32:38,640 --> 00:32:40,720
Speaker 1: ruin the rest of my day. I will be sitting

687
00:32:40,760 --> 00:32:44,160
Speaker 1: here staring at them. It will ruin everything. So thank

688
00:32:44,200 --> 00:32:44,720
Speaker 1: you so much.

689
00:32:45,360 --> 00:32:46,720
Speaker 3: One last thing I was going to ask you is

690
00:32:46,720 --> 00:32:48,920
Speaker 3: who do you think has, according to the site, the

691
00:32:48,960 --> 00:32:50,560
Speaker 3: greatest hitter season in history?

692
00:32:53,360 --> 00:32:54,040
Speaker 1: Barry Bonds.

693
00:32:55,720 --> 00:33:01,360
Speaker 3: According to them, it was Ronald Acuna's forty seventy burning

694
00:33:01,400 --> 00:33:03,000
Speaker 3: the dollar value.

695
00:33:03,160 --> 00:33:06,600
Speaker 1: Work see hitters was Bonds two.

696
00:33:08,120 --> 00:33:11,400
Speaker 2: To his showhand I'm looking fifty talking about how are

697
00:33:11,400 --> 00:33:11,960
Speaker 2: they rating this?

698
00:33:12,040 --> 00:33:15,920
Speaker 1: Barry Bonds is even on this list.

699
00:33:14,960 --> 00:33:17,760
Speaker 2: He comes in at Yeah, I don't know how they

700
00:33:17,800 --> 00:33:19,160
Speaker 2: do this. I'm gonna have to Barry Bonds.

701
00:33:19,200 --> 00:33:24,400
Speaker 1: His nineteen ninety three season had a fifty two what

702
00:33:24,520 --> 00:33:27,840
Speaker 1: is the dollar ratio that is? They're not dollaring. This

703
00:33:27,880 --> 00:33:28,880
Speaker 1: is not dollaring to me.

704
00:33:30,760 --> 00:33:33,360
Speaker 3: Yeah, it says he was a fifty three dollars player,

705
00:33:33,400 --> 00:33:35,880
Speaker 3: which is absolutely brilliant. But I don't know how his

706
00:33:35,880 --> 00:33:39,959
Speaker 3: best season is forty ninth, like Jeff Bagwell's best season

707
00:33:40,440 --> 00:33:41,640
Speaker 3: can't be better than.

708
00:33:41,880 --> 00:33:45,280
Speaker 1: Larry Walker had a better Seaton had a better fantasy

709
00:33:45,360 --> 00:33:49,400
Speaker 1: season in nineteen ninety seven than any Barry Bonds season

710
00:33:49,440 --> 00:33:50,080
Speaker 1: in history.

711
00:33:52,280 --> 00:33:55,800
Speaker 3: I know that Larry Walker season was like insanity, like

712
00:33:55,920 --> 00:33:59,239
Speaker 3: he hit forty nine homers, stole thirty three, thirty three

713
00:33:59,360 --> 00:34:02,320
Speaker 3: sixty six average. I don't know that it beats Bonds

714
00:34:02,320 --> 00:34:04,200
Speaker 3: as like seventy three homers in one hundred.

715
00:34:04,360 --> 00:34:08,239
Speaker 1: Where's the seventy three homer season on this one. I

716
00:34:08,280 --> 00:34:09,960
Speaker 1: gotta look now, okay, this is the last thing and

717
00:34:09,960 --> 00:34:12,200
Speaker 1: then we're moving on. This has completely derailed us, but

718
00:34:12,239 --> 00:34:15,960
Speaker 1: it's fun. I'm okay. Barry Bonds this season was a

719
00:34:16,000 --> 00:34:20,239
Speaker 1: forty five dollars season. He had seventy three homers, one

720
00:34:20,360 --> 00:34:23,680
Speaker 1: hundred and thirty seven RBI, one hundred and twenty seven runs,

721
00:34:23,719 --> 00:34:27,560
Speaker 1: thirteen stolen bases, and at three twenty seven average through

722
00:34:27,560 --> 00:34:31,520
Speaker 1: twenty eight average. But guys, that is a forty five

723
00:34:31,640 --> 00:34:33,600
Speaker 1: dollars season. What.

724
00:34:35,640 --> 00:34:36,520
Speaker 2: I don't get it either.

725
00:34:36,520 --> 00:34:40,000
Speaker 1: Honestly, Sammy Sosa's sixty six homer season was worth more

726
00:34:40,040 --> 00:34:43,240
Speaker 1: because he had a few more RBIs they're saying that

727
00:34:43,239 --> 00:34:47,400
Speaker 1: that Barry Bond season with seventy something homers wasn't even

728
00:34:47,440 --> 00:34:53,760
Speaker 1: a top one hundred fantasy performance. This is broken.

729
00:34:54,760 --> 00:34:57,919
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's a little odd. That's a little odd for sure.

730
00:34:58,000 --> 00:35:00,600
Speaker 1: And someone's going to complain and be like, Okay, I

731
00:35:00,600 --> 00:35:05,040
Speaker 1: don't care. Like Barry Bond's twenty something points higher than

732
00:35:06,080 --> 00:35:09,120
Speaker 1: than Sammy Sosa, had more runs, had more homers. He

733
00:35:09,200 --> 00:35:12,640
Speaker 1: literally only got beat in RBI by Sammy Sosa, and

734
00:35:12,680 --> 00:35:15,440
Speaker 1: Sammy Sosa ranked two or three more dollars worth. That

735
00:35:15,480 --> 00:35:19,600
Speaker 1: doesn't math, doesn't math to me. I think we'll ever

736
00:35:19,600 --> 00:35:22,080
Speaker 1: see a seventy homer ga again quickly.

737
00:35:22,840 --> 00:35:24,840
Speaker 2: Cal Rawley this year? Maybe, No, I don't think so.

738
00:35:25,000 --> 00:35:27,520
Speaker 3: I think seven seventy might be too much if we

739
00:35:27,560 --> 00:35:30,319
Speaker 3: ever get like a full, healthy Judge season where he

740
00:35:30,360 --> 00:35:33,280
Speaker 3: doesn't ever slump then maybe, but we're kind of running

741
00:35:33,320 --> 00:35:34,200
Speaker 3: out of time for that.

742
00:35:34,320 --> 00:35:35,200
Speaker 2: Judge is sixty two.

743
00:35:35,200 --> 00:35:38,560
Speaker 3: Homer season is also among the most valuable seasons ever

744
00:35:38,560 --> 00:35:41,560
Speaker 3: according to Raswaldt, number ten all time. If he's got

745
00:35:41,600 --> 00:35:43,239
Speaker 3: fanabody's gonna do, it's probably gonna be him.

746
00:35:43,560 --> 00:35:46,520
Speaker 1: Yeah, maybe you guys want to come and ask live

747
00:35:46,640 --> 00:35:49,080
Speaker 1: questions to me and Joe Piezapia. You can. I'm out

748
00:35:49,120 --> 00:35:51,440
Speaker 1: later this week, but my last show of the week

749
00:35:51,680 --> 00:35:55,920
Speaker 1: will be four pm Eastern on our YouTube Fantasypro our

750
00:35:55,960 --> 00:35:59,879
Speaker 1: YouTube dot com slash Fantasy pros MLB. Make sure you're

751
00:36:00,000 --> 00:36:03,160
Speaker 1: described there. We got awesome giveaways all of our videos

752
00:36:03,160 --> 00:36:05,200
Speaker 1: for leading off show if you can't go live, and

753
00:36:05,239 --> 00:36:07,359
Speaker 1: we will be live four pm Eastern for a full

754
00:36:07,360 --> 00:36:10,600
Speaker 1: hour answering your guys's questions. We do it every single Wednesday,

755
00:36:10,840 --> 00:36:12,600
Speaker 1: and you can even go front of the line by

756
00:36:12,840 --> 00:36:15,520
Speaker 1: putting in a super chat. You are absolutely guaranteed to

757
00:36:15,560 --> 00:36:20,120
Speaker 1: have your question answered. Otherwise you're just you're up into

758
00:36:20,160 --> 00:36:22,480
Speaker 1: the question. Gods, you just got to hope for the

759
00:36:22,480 --> 00:36:24,560
Speaker 1: best that it is going to pop up for you there.

760
00:36:24,600 --> 00:36:27,600
Speaker 1: But that is that's got me all worked up. Here

761
00:36:28,000 --> 00:36:30,720
Speaker 1: after all that, All right, Burn, let's do some lightning

762
00:36:30,719 --> 00:36:34,440
Speaker 1: around here? Are you ready? Matt Shaw? Drop a ble

763
00:36:34,440 --> 00:36:34,960
Speaker 1: in ten team?

764
00:36:35,000 --> 00:36:37,319
Speaker 2: Rodo? Absolutely?

765
00:36:37,719 --> 00:36:40,840
Speaker 1: Absolutely unfortunate. But oh it's a keeper. It's what I

766
00:36:40,840 --> 00:36:41,319
Speaker 1: didn't say.

767
00:36:42,880 --> 00:36:44,400
Speaker 2: It depends on the number of keepers.

768
00:36:44,440 --> 00:36:48,000
Speaker 3: I think if it's like ten keepers, maybe, but in

769
00:36:48,040 --> 00:36:49,560
Speaker 3: a ten team league, I think it's.

770
00:36:49,400 --> 00:36:51,280
Speaker 2: Pretty fringe even in a keeper standpoint.

771
00:36:51,640 --> 00:36:54,600
Speaker 1: That's you said it perfectly, like if it were a

772
00:36:54,760 --> 00:36:59,319
Speaker 1: five keeper or eight keeper, like, probably not. If it's ten,

773
00:36:59,560 --> 00:37:02,719
Speaker 1: maybe to keep him. So I guess the answer is

774
00:37:02,719 --> 00:37:05,719
Speaker 1: still kind of like, yes, you can drop him. I

775
00:37:05,760 --> 00:37:08,959
Speaker 1: got fought Ober and Taj Bradley. They're killing me? Are

776
00:37:09,000 --> 00:37:14,120
Speaker 1: they droppable? Fought is one hundred percent dropable? Ober might

777
00:37:14,200 --> 00:37:16,480
Speaker 1: be after today, I think I want to hold on

778
00:37:16,520 --> 00:37:19,920
Speaker 1: to Bradley, But if it's a smaller ten team league,

779
00:37:20,280 --> 00:37:23,920
Speaker 1: probably Fought is without question the most droppable of all this.

780
00:37:24,000 --> 00:37:25,879
Speaker 1: What a disaster and disappointment.

781
00:37:27,239 --> 00:37:27,439
Speaker 2: Yeah.

782
00:37:27,480 --> 00:37:29,600
Speaker 3: Here he was sitting with like eight wins through six

783
00:37:29,640 --> 00:37:31,560
Speaker 3: weeks and I was thinking that he was actually going

784
00:37:31,640 --> 00:37:33,200
Speaker 3: to be a breakout like I thought he was, But

785
00:37:33,280 --> 00:37:36,680
Speaker 3: holy crap, it's been awful. So with Bradley and Ober,

786
00:37:36,680 --> 00:37:38,960
Speaker 3: for me, this is essentially their last week where they

787
00:37:38,960 --> 00:37:40,799
Speaker 3: have a chance. They both have two starts, they both

788
00:37:40,840 --> 00:37:44,560
Speaker 3: have decent enough matchups. If we get burned this week

789
00:37:44,600 --> 00:37:46,439
Speaker 3: with Bradley, he might not make it to the second start.

790
00:37:46,440 --> 00:37:47,480
Speaker 2: It might be boil season.

791
00:37:48,120 --> 00:37:50,439
Speaker 3: So he's, you know, probably number two on that list

792
00:37:50,440 --> 00:37:52,240
Speaker 3: in terms of droppable after fought Ober.

793
00:37:52,280 --> 00:37:53,520
Speaker 2: I don't know what the hell to do with Ober.

794
00:37:53,560 --> 00:37:55,680
Speaker 2: He's been awful. I think he might be pitching hurt.

795
00:37:55,800 --> 00:37:58,160
Speaker 1: Honestly, he's just not good. He's pitching not good. So

796
00:37:59,400 --> 00:38:02,279
Speaker 1: I think you can theoretically move on from any of

797
00:38:02,360 --> 00:38:05,560
Speaker 1: any of those guys. But the order of how quick fought,

798
00:38:05,640 --> 00:38:08,360
Speaker 1: now Ober's in the middle. I might hold on to

799
00:38:08,440 --> 00:38:11,040
Speaker 1: Bradley the most, but or maybe I mean Ober's upside

800
00:38:11,080 --> 00:38:13,680
Speaker 1: is exciting, but he's been disastrous. But fought. You can

801
00:38:14,080 --> 00:38:18,040
Speaker 1: peace out. Let's see big dance. He was responding to

802
00:38:18,080 --> 00:38:21,600
Speaker 1: something earlier. I'm in a four outfield weekly league. I

803
00:38:21,600 --> 00:38:25,480
Speaker 1: got Roman Anthony, Nimo, Langford, Butler, and Judge. Who do

804
00:38:25,560 --> 00:38:29,520
Speaker 1: I bench? I think you can pretty successfully bench Roman

805
00:38:29,520 --> 00:38:30,960
Speaker 1: Anthony right now he's hitting one hundred.

806
00:38:32,920 --> 00:38:35,120
Speaker 3: Yeah, I'm just looking at the matchups this week at

807
00:38:35,120 --> 00:38:39,040
Speaker 3: the Angels and then Toronto. He's probably the bench for now.

808
00:38:39,080 --> 00:38:41,360
Speaker 3: I benched him for Chandler Simpson myself in one league

809
00:38:41,360 --> 00:38:41,960
Speaker 3: this week.

810
00:38:41,840 --> 00:38:42,279
Speaker 1: I would do it.

811
00:38:42,280 --> 00:38:42,520
Speaker 2: I don't.

812
00:38:42,520 --> 00:38:44,040
Speaker 3: I don't think he's a I don't think he's a

813
00:38:44,120 --> 00:38:46,040
Speaker 3: must start at the moment, especially with all the guys

814
00:38:46,080 --> 00:38:46,759
Speaker 3: you got going there.

815
00:38:46,800 --> 00:38:49,400
Speaker 1: Oh no, let him get right and then start Netto

816
00:38:49,560 --> 00:38:53,960
Speaker 1: or Zuna in DH for the week, I'd start Neoto

817
00:38:54,360 --> 00:38:55,200
Speaker 1: or Ozuna.

818
00:38:55,360 --> 00:38:58,279
Speaker 3: Let me just quickly check. So Boston and Washington for

819
00:38:58,360 --> 00:39:02,080
Speaker 3: the Angels. In Atlanta is Mets, and I probably go

820
00:39:02,160 --> 00:39:02,560
Speaker 3: with Netto.

821
00:39:04,160 --> 00:39:06,799
Speaker 1: All right, Okay, so we're both going Neto. Ben Brown

822
00:39:06,880 --> 00:39:09,040
Speaker 1: is always loved by fantasy pros. Almost every time he's

823
00:39:09,040 --> 00:39:11,399
Speaker 1: a two start pitcher or pitching streamer, he's always first

824
00:39:11,440 --> 00:39:14,600
Speaker 1: or second best available recording to pros. Do y'all like him,

825
00:39:14,800 --> 00:39:19,040
Speaker 1: or do y'all like him a bunch as well? High upside,

826
00:39:19,120 --> 00:39:21,279
Speaker 1: low downside? Or do you think he's an average pitcher

827
00:39:21,280 --> 00:39:23,920
Speaker 1: resids seas. That's so funny you say that because we

828
00:39:24,000 --> 00:39:26,239
Speaker 1: had something. A couple of us kind of helped power

829
00:39:26,239 --> 00:39:28,640
Speaker 1: a lot of the tools behind the scenes. Mike Mayer, myself,

830
00:39:28,760 --> 00:39:31,640
Speaker 1: Kelly Kirby and there was this Ben Brown thing that

831
00:39:31,680 --> 00:39:34,560
Speaker 1: came up where it was like someone's like, oh my gosh,

832
00:39:34,560 --> 00:39:36,239
Speaker 1: you know this is it might have been you that

833
00:39:36,280 --> 00:39:38,520
Speaker 1: asked this question. To be honest with you, someone was like,

834
00:39:38,880 --> 00:39:41,520
Speaker 1: you know, he's high in the two start, but he

835
00:39:41,680 --> 00:39:44,319
Speaker 1: ranks low in the rest of season, And it was

836
00:39:44,480 --> 00:39:46,520
Speaker 1: kind of one of our devs brought it to us

837
00:39:46,520 --> 00:39:48,799
Speaker 1: and we all kind of agreed, like listen, when you're

838
00:39:48,800 --> 00:39:52,000
Speaker 1: talking about rest of season, Ben Brown is volatile and

839
00:39:52,040 --> 00:39:54,440
Speaker 1: I don't really trust him. I think he is a

840
00:39:54,600 --> 00:39:58,600
Speaker 1: stream I think he's the quintessential streamer. If the matchups

841
00:39:58,600 --> 00:40:00,840
Speaker 1: are good with striker and their striker potential with a

842
00:40:00,880 --> 00:40:03,120
Speaker 1: great offense, I'm with it. But I'm going to pay

843
00:40:03,120 --> 00:40:05,840
Speaker 1: attention to the matchups, but I don't trust him, like long,

844
00:40:05,880 --> 00:40:09,319
Speaker 1: long term. It was a question about like, you know,

845
00:40:09,360 --> 00:40:11,400
Speaker 1: where we had him ranked rest of the season, and

846
00:40:11,480 --> 00:40:13,919
Speaker 1: it was in like the eighties of SPS, because yeah,

847
00:40:13,920 --> 00:40:15,839
Speaker 1: I think anything can change at any time. But it's

848
00:40:15,880 --> 00:40:18,239
Speaker 1: just funny that brought up. I'm okay with him. I

849
00:40:18,280 --> 00:40:20,319
Speaker 1: think like I said, I think he's a higher end

850
00:40:20,320 --> 00:40:23,279
Speaker 1: streamer with strikeout potential, but really tough matchups like you're

851
00:40:23,320 --> 00:40:25,719
Speaker 1: going up against the Braves, I'm probably going to pass.

852
00:40:25,760 --> 00:40:28,600
Speaker 1: Do you have any more hardcore feelings or anything like that?

853
00:40:28,640 --> 00:40:29,280
Speaker 1: On Ben Brown?

854
00:40:30,400 --> 00:40:32,759
Speaker 3: I really like him. I think that he is not

855
00:40:32,920 --> 00:40:35,440
Speaker 3: quite ready for somebody to like. Not not quite a

856
00:40:35,520 --> 00:40:37,239
Speaker 3: must start every week type of thing, but a lot

857
00:40:37,239 --> 00:40:39,920
Speaker 3: of the numbers below the surface are really good. Twenty

858
00:40:39,960 --> 00:40:42,799
Speaker 3: six percent strikeout rate with only a seven percent walk rate.

859
00:40:43,360 --> 00:40:46,399
Speaker 3: ERA is ugly, no question, but he if you look

860
00:40:46,400 --> 00:40:49,480
Speaker 3: at all the supporting metrics three forty five FIP. I

861
00:40:49,520 --> 00:40:51,239
Speaker 3: look at Sierra more than any of the others, and

862
00:40:51,280 --> 00:40:54,319
Speaker 3: he's at three forty two. His Sierra right now, at

863
00:40:54,320 --> 00:40:55,680
Speaker 3: three forty two.

864
00:40:55,840 --> 00:40:56,920
Speaker 2: Is better than Nick Pavetta.

865
00:40:56,960 --> 00:41:00,200
Speaker 3: It's better than Bassett, Flaherty, Chris Bubitch, Drew Rasmussen, and

866
00:41:00,680 --> 00:41:03,040
Speaker 3: he's I think he's close. Like I don't think that

867
00:41:03,080 --> 00:41:05,319
Speaker 3: he is somebody that I'm just starting indiscriminately for now.

868
00:41:05,360 --> 00:41:08,240
Speaker 3: I'm picking my spots, but he's definitely somebody I'm still holding.

869
00:41:08,719 --> 00:41:11,720
Speaker 1: Keep him into the top of the streaming pay attention

870
00:41:11,800 --> 00:41:13,719
Speaker 1: to the matchups coming up, but you know, from a

871
00:41:13,800 --> 00:41:16,040
Speaker 1: rest of season rank perspective, is still going to be

872
00:41:16,120 --> 00:41:19,200
Speaker 1: kind of low. A Rosarina moving forward, are you in

873
00:41:19,440 --> 00:41:20,000
Speaker 1: or are you out.

874
00:41:22,560 --> 00:41:24,239
Speaker 3: I mean, it kind of depends on the situation. If

875
00:41:24,280 --> 00:41:27,239
Speaker 3: it's a ten team three outfielder league, I think he's

876
00:41:27,600 --> 00:41:31,279
Speaker 3: pretty okay, like he's kind of borderline, but you know,

877
00:41:31,320 --> 00:41:32,719
Speaker 3: if it's a deeper league, you kind of just have

878
00:41:32,800 --> 00:41:34,600
Speaker 3: to hold on. He hasn't been bad this year. He's

879
00:41:34,640 --> 00:41:37,239
Speaker 3: hitting two forty eight homers, fourteen steals.

880
00:41:37,640 --> 00:41:38,480
Speaker 2: He's been fine.

881
00:41:38,520 --> 00:41:40,720
Speaker 3: But I think in those shallower formats you can probably

882
00:41:40,719 --> 00:41:44,640
Speaker 3: stream if anything, where you're starting or outfielders, at least,

883
00:41:44,680 --> 00:41:45,799
Speaker 3: I'd want to hold him though.

884
00:41:45,840 --> 00:41:46,200
Speaker 2: For sure.

885
00:41:46,480 --> 00:41:49,840
Speaker 1: I think outside of three ten team three outfield I'm good.

886
00:41:50,040 --> 00:41:51,719
Speaker 1: I'm good with keeping him and rolling him. He is

887
00:41:51,800 --> 00:41:54,080
Speaker 1: hitting well this month to eighty six, so this month

888
00:41:54,120 --> 00:41:57,080
Speaker 1: that things are starting to click with some interesting profile stuff,

889
00:41:57,120 --> 00:42:01,120
Speaker 1: So I'm still good. Tomorrow Miserowski or Schemes. Is that

890
00:42:01,160 --> 00:42:04,800
Speaker 1: the matchup we have too? I think that is. I

891
00:42:04,840 --> 00:42:07,440
Speaker 1: think it's Missy in Schemes Tomorrow Wednesday.

892
00:42:07,480 --> 00:42:10,160
Speaker 3: I think that's Wednesday, unless Rota Wires got it off

893
00:42:10,200 --> 00:42:10,640
Speaker 3: maybe better.

894
00:42:10,719 --> 00:42:12,319
Speaker 1: Well, either way, I think we have those two going

895
00:42:12,400 --> 00:42:13,319
Speaker 1: up against each other.

896
00:42:14,719 --> 00:42:16,440
Speaker 2: Ski without a doubt, Well.

897
00:42:16,320 --> 00:42:18,759
Speaker 1: Schemes scheme is a better pitcher, but who's gonna get

898
00:42:18,760 --> 00:42:19,840
Speaker 1: the run support.

899
00:42:21,239 --> 00:42:23,399
Speaker 2: I mean, Milwaukee's offense is pretty bad too.

900
00:42:23,840 --> 00:42:26,120
Speaker 1: How about how about we go under three and a

901
00:42:26,160 --> 00:42:27,799
Speaker 1: half runs in the first five.

902
00:42:30,600 --> 00:42:31,080
Speaker 2: With mine?

903
00:42:31,400 --> 00:42:33,439
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, you combine them, like the first first five

904
00:42:33,520 --> 00:42:36,120
Speaker 1: is typically four and a half. I will bet you

905
00:42:36,960 --> 00:42:39,560
Speaker 1: that game is so typical game would be like eight

906
00:42:39,600 --> 00:42:43,320
Speaker 1: and a half runs. So your your first five innings,

907
00:42:43,400 --> 00:42:45,879
Speaker 1: here's a little betting thing. Your first five innings would

908
00:42:45,880 --> 00:42:48,759
Speaker 1: typically have like a four and a half runs, and

909
00:42:48,840 --> 00:42:51,719
Speaker 1: it might be like minus one twenty or one twenty

910
00:42:51,719 --> 00:42:54,080
Speaker 1: five or something like that. And then it juices up

911
00:42:54,080 --> 00:42:55,759
Speaker 1: a little bit more if you go to eight. And

912
00:42:55,760 --> 00:42:57,680
Speaker 1: then if it's in the sevens, that's where it doesn't

913
00:42:57,680 --> 00:43:00,080
Speaker 1: make sense to play under five or under four and

914
00:43:00,120 --> 00:43:02,719
Speaker 1: a half runs. So I'll bet you that game is

915
00:43:02,760 --> 00:43:05,440
Speaker 1: going to be a line of seven and a half runs,

916
00:43:05,960 --> 00:43:09,000
Speaker 1: and I'll bet you the under four and a half

917
00:43:09,080 --> 00:43:10,919
Speaker 1: is going to be way too juice. But you might

918
00:43:10,920 --> 00:43:12,920
Speaker 1: be able to get close to plus money if you

919
00:43:12,960 --> 00:43:16,600
Speaker 1: bet under three runs between both teams through the first five.

920
00:43:16,920 --> 00:43:20,200
Speaker 1: I think I might play that. I like, Missy feels

921
00:43:20,200 --> 00:43:20,920
Speaker 1: pretty safe.

922
00:43:21,400 --> 00:43:24,000
Speaker 3: It feels pretty safe. Yeah, I mean, Pittsburgh is so

923
00:43:24,800 --> 00:43:27,960
Speaker 3: embarrassingly bad offensively they don't scare you at all. Milwaukee's

924
00:43:27,960 --> 00:43:30,799
Speaker 3: actually had a decent June, but they also been pretty

925
00:43:30,840 --> 00:43:31,520
Speaker 3: feeble this year.

926
00:43:31,560 --> 00:43:33,640
Speaker 2: So I think that that's a fair bet. Under three

927
00:43:33,680 --> 00:43:35,000
Speaker 2: and a half, Yeah, I think i'd take that.

928
00:43:35,080 --> 00:43:36,960
Speaker 1: And if it opens up higher, if it's eight and

929
00:43:36,960 --> 00:43:39,320
Speaker 1: a half and you can get under four and a

930
00:43:39,360 --> 00:43:43,959
Speaker 1: half runs, you know for like minus one fifteen or something, gimme, gimme, gimme, gimme.

931
00:43:45,280 --> 00:43:51,760
Speaker 1: Last one. Dynasty al Contra Taj Bradley, Gavin Williams pick.

932
00:43:51,600 --> 00:43:57,160
Speaker 3: One oh Man, probably Sandy, Probably Sandy, but I don't

933
00:43:57,160 --> 00:43:59,239
Speaker 3: really love any of them. Yeah.

934
00:43:59,320 --> 00:44:01,879
Speaker 1: I like Sandy. He's really turned it around two point

935
00:44:01,960 --> 00:44:04,920
Speaker 1: seventy ra in this month, seems to be more confident.

936
00:44:05,440 --> 00:44:07,399
Speaker 1: This should lead to a trade, which is gonna help

937
00:44:07,480 --> 00:44:10,880
Speaker 1: him even more. I'm gonna pick I'm team Sandy on

938
00:44:10,920 --> 00:44:13,000
Speaker 1: this one. Taj and Gavin have both been just a

939
00:44:13,080 --> 00:44:17,440
Speaker 1: little eh, so, uh, this is team Sandy for me,

940
00:44:17,560 --> 00:44:18,640
Speaker 1: even though he's been Lacey.

941
00:44:19,080 --> 00:44:20,960
Speaker 2: So yeah, there we go.

942
00:44:21,200 --> 00:44:23,680
Speaker 1: There we go, Team Sandy, and there you go. Friends,

943
00:44:23,680 --> 00:44:25,440
Speaker 1: Thank you so much for hanging out with us. Hopefully

944
00:44:25,480 --> 00:44:28,160
Speaker 1: you guys enjoyed this episode. Come and be a part

945
00:44:28,160 --> 00:44:30,200
Speaker 1: of it. You're listening on the podcast on the discord,

946
00:44:30,239 --> 00:44:32,560
Speaker 1: you know where to go Fantasypros dot com slash chat.

947
00:44:32,840 --> 00:44:36,400
Speaker 1: Make sure you're subscribed to the podcast for all of

948
00:44:36,440 --> 00:44:39,719
Speaker 1: the offerings. I assume you listening here are We've got

949
00:44:39,760 --> 00:44:41,520
Speaker 1: a bunch of great offerings there. And make sure to

950
00:44:41,600 --> 00:44:44,400
Speaker 1: join us on the YouTube YouTube dot com slash Fantasy

951
00:44:44,400 --> 00:44:48,640
Speaker 1: Pros MLB on Wednesday four pm Eastern for the live

952
00:44:48,680 --> 00:44:52,600
Speaker 1: show and you can check uSwitch dot tv at noon

953
00:44:52,640 --> 00:44:55,560
Speaker 1: Eastern and watch Joe and I live throughout the week

954
00:44:55,600 --> 00:44:57,360
Speaker 1: except Thursday and Friday, where it'll be the Joe and

955
00:44:57,440 --> 00:44:59,040
Speaker 1: Joe Show. Rico is gonna be filling in for me

956
00:44:59,080 --> 00:45:01,720
Speaker 1: on Thursday and Friday, so piece of Pia and Norico

957
00:45:02,120 --> 00:45:04,040
Speaker 1: will be taking you home at the back half of

958
00:45:04,080 --> 00:45:06,600
Speaker 1: the week. Got so go and support them live. And

959
00:45:06,640 --> 00:45:11,320
Speaker 1: that is it, Joe Rico Ani final thoughts starts baseball

960
00:45:11,360 --> 00:45:12,520
Speaker 1: things exciting whatever.

961
00:45:14,000 --> 00:45:16,319
Speaker 3: I am just boiling here in Toronto, man, Like I

962
00:45:16,360 --> 00:45:18,879
Speaker 3: sold you before, it is ill and me I'm used

963
00:45:18,920 --> 00:45:21,840
Speaker 3: to being cold all year long, so I'm going to

964
00:45:21,920 --> 00:45:24,759
Speaker 3: bring the computer outside tonight, watching baseball outside in the

965
00:45:24,760 --> 00:45:26,120
Speaker 3: heat and have a couple of beers.

966
00:45:26,120 --> 00:45:28,839
Speaker 1: Probably, yeah, you were trying to break down. I can't comprehend,

967
00:45:28,960 --> 00:45:31,799
Speaker 1: Like when I hear he's like, man, it's thirty six celsius,

968
00:45:31,800 --> 00:45:34,640
Speaker 1: and I'm just like, that just doesn't sound hot, like

969
00:45:34,880 --> 00:45:38,080
Speaker 1: one hundred and twelve fahrenheit. Even if we didn't use

970
00:45:38,120 --> 00:45:41,400
Speaker 1: fahrenheit and celsius, I'm not even get that whole discussion.

971
00:45:41,920 --> 00:45:45,839
Speaker 1: One hundred and twelve sounds hot. Thirty six anything does

972
00:45:45,880 --> 00:45:49,440
Speaker 1: not sound hot unless that's you know, earned runs given up.

973
00:45:49,480 --> 00:45:52,160
Speaker 1: Thirty six seems like a low number, so you're like,

974
00:45:52,200 --> 00:45:55,120
Speaker 1: whoa thirty six celsius? And I'm like, okay, buddy, it

975
00:45:55,160 --> 00:45:58,560
Speaker 1: sounds great, but it's not. Apparently it's like high nineties.

976
00:45:58,600 --> 00:46:02,319
Speaker 3: And for the Americans listening right now, who have no

977
00:46:02,360 --> 00:46:05,120
Speaker 3: idea what I'm talking about with celsius, it feels like

978
00:46:05,120 --> 00:46:07,799
Speaker 3: one hundred and eleven fahrenheit in Toronto, and I am

979
00:46:07,920 --> 00:46:08,600
Speaker 3: not used to that.

980
00:46:08,719 --> 00:46:11,080
Speaker 2: So it is beer time. It is beer season tonight

981
00:46:11,080 --> 00:46:11,399
Speaker 2: for sure.

982
00:46:11,400 --> 00:46:14,320
Speaker 1: All right. Well, the air conditioning season here on always

983
00:46:14,560 --> 00:46:17,680
Speaker 1: and Arizona. I feel for nobody when heat has complained about,

984
00:46:17,760 --> 00:46:19,719
Speaker 1: as we are one hundred and ten every day in

985
00:46:19,760 --> 00:46:21,840
Speaker 1: heat warnings. But you guys don't care about that. You

986
00:46:21,880 --> 00:46:23,799
Speaker 1: care about the baseball and we got it covered for you.

987
00:46:24,120 --> 00:46:25,839
Speaker 1: So thank you so much for hanging out with us.

988
00:46:25,840 --> 00:46:28,120
Speaker 1: For Joe Rico, I'm Chris Welsh Friends. Will talk to

989
00:46:28,160 --> 00:46:30,120
Speaker 1: you next time right here on Fantasy Pros.

990
00:46:30,239 --> 00:46:30,399
Speaker 2: BUYE.

991
00:46:30,480 --> 00:46:33,400
Speaker 1: Until then, thanks for listening to the Fantasy Pros Fantasy

992
00:46:33,400 --> 00:46:34,480
Speaker 1: Baseball Podcast.

993
00:46:34,760 --> 00:46:37,120
Speaker 3: If you love the show, the best freeway to support

994
00:46:37,200 --> 00:46:37,839
Speaker 3: us is by leaving

995
00:46:37,880 --> 00:46:41,560
Speaker 1: A positive review on Apple Podcasts or Spotify, Follow us

996
00:46:41,600 --> 00:46:45,360
Speaker 1: on x, Instagram and TikTok at Fantasy Pros, and subscribe

997
00:46:45,360 --> 00:46:48,240
Speaker 1: to our YouTube channel at YouTube dot com slash Fantasy

998
00:46:48,239 --> 00:46:49,040
Speaker 1: Pros MLB