WEBVTT - How Reverse Psychology Works

0:00:00.760 --> 0:00:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff you Should Know from House Stuff Works

0:00:04.240 --> 0:00:12.880
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Hey, and welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh Clark,

0:00:12.960 --> 0:00:17.160
<v Speaker 1>There's Charles W Chuck Bryant. This is Stuff you should Know.

0:00:19.360 --> 0:00:21.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm a little grumpy about this topic. I'm just gonna

0:00:21.360 --> 0:00:24.320
<v Speaker 1>go ahead and throw that out there because it's pretty thin.

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Well not only is it thin, but just the older

0:00:30.280 --> 0:00:35.200
<v Speaker 1>I've gotten, man, it's just all we're talking about reverse psychology,

0:00:35.600 --> 0:00:39.080
<v Speaker 1>and I see it's used with like kids sometimes and stuff,

0:00:39.600 --> 0:00:42.320
<v Speaker 1>but then when it gets to like relationships and dude,

0:00:42.440 --> 0:00:46.919
<v Speaker 1>professional relationships in business, I just it's a little discussed.

0:00:46.960 --> 0:00:51.720
<v Speaker 1>It all feels like manipulative games. And the older I've gotten,

0:00:51.800 --> 0:00:54.440
<v Speaker 1>the more I just have no time for that garbage.

0:00:54.920 --> 0:00:58.760
<v Speaker 1>And I'm just you know, like, be honest. Even if

0:00:58.800 --> 0:01:01.080
<v Speaker 1>things don't turn out, well, yeah, at least you were

0:01:01.120 --> 0:01:05.480
<v Speaker 1>honest and you weren't being some manipulative puppet master. It's

0:01:05.520 --> 0:01:09.319
<v Speaker 1>just gross, dude. I ran across advice on how to

0:01:09.400 --> 0:01:12.560
<v Speaker 1>use reverse psychology to get your boyfriend back. There's a

0:01:12.600 --> 0:01:15.400
<v Speaker 1>site called ex Boyfriend Recovery dot com and it gives

0:01:15.440 --> 0:01:21.120
<v Speaker 1>tips on it. It really insists on asking the question,

0:01:21.440 --> 0:01:25.039
<v Speaker 1>do you want the person who you can use reverse

0:01:25.080 --> 0:01:28.160
<v Speaker 1>psychology to get back. And if you're using that kind

0:01:28.200 --> 0:01:30.120
<v Speaker 1>of stuff, it's like, this is the tactic you're taking

0:01:30.160 --> 0:01:33.960
<v Speaker 1>to get your your boyfriend back. Um, then is this

0:01:34.160 --> 0:01:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Is this the kind of relationship you really want in life? Agreed?

0:01:38.560 --> 0:01:40.640
<v Speaker 1>So I'm right there with you. I think I think

0:01:40.680 --> 0:01:43.480
<v Speaker 1>people are so afraid to walk away from a relationship

0:01:43.560 --> 0:01:48.200
<v Speaker 1>even if it's toxic. Um, we don't touch on that

0:01:48.240 --> 0:01:49.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of stuff much. We should do more stuff on

0:01:49.840 --> 0:01:52.800
<v Speaker 1>relationships like that because it is tough, and I get it.

0:01:53.040 --> 0:01:55.960
<v Speaker 1>But um, I don't know. Man, you get a little

0:01:55.960 --> 0:01:58.400
<v Speaker 1>age under your belt and it's very easy to just

0:01:58.480 --> 0:02:03.680
<v Speaker 1>say get out of that. Treat yourself with kindness and respect,

0:02:03.960 --> 0:02:06.760
<v Speaker 1>even even if you take that out of the equation.

0:02:07.200 --> 0:02:10.160
<v Speaker 1>You shouldn't manipulate other people and being in a relationship

0:02:10.240 --> 0:02:12.640
<v Speaker 1>with you, not at all. That's a pretty good rule

0:02:12.639 --> 0:02:15.360
<v Speaker 1>of thumb that applies to just about everybody. It will

0:02:15.440 --> 0:02:18.360
<v Speaker 1>lead to badness. You also should not be such a

0:02:18.400 --> 0:02:21.960
<v Speaker 1>desperate human being that you buy something you can't afford

0:02:22.040 --> 0:02:26.920
<v Speaker 1>to impress the salesman who's selling it to you. Another

0:02:26.960 --> 0:02:29.360
<v Speaker 1>good rule of thumb that might work on me. Actually,

0:02:29.480 --> 0:02:31.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe that's why it bug me too. Oh yeah, I

0:02:31.480 --> 0:02:37.080
<v Speaker 1>can't afford that. I'll take two, all right, I'll show you.

0:02:37.919 --> 0:02:41.120
<v Speaker 1>All right, that was all preamble. Yeah, but we sadly

0:02:41.160 --> 0:02:44.200
<v Speaker 1>covered a lot of this topic and just that preamble.

0:02:44.480 --> 0:02:48.800
<v Speaker 1>So we're talking reverse psychology. And it turns out psychology

0:02:48.840 --> 0:02:53.600
<v Speaker 1>itself doesn't even really recognize reverse psychology, although it is

0:02:53.639 --> 0:02:57.000
<v Speaker 1>definitely a thing. Like you can point to certain instances

0:02:57.000 --> 0:03:00.880
<v Speaker 1>of reverse psychology, and the basis of it is that

0:03:01.320 --> 0:03:05.920
<v Speaker 1>you are telling somebody to do the opposite of what

0:03:06.000 --> 0:03:09.600
<v Speaker 1>you want them to do. And what you're doing when

0:03:09.760 --> 0:03:13.320
<v Speaker 1>you get them to react and do the opposite of

0:03:13.360 --> 0:03:15.440
<v Speaker 1>what you're saying, which is what you really want them

0:03:15.480 --> 0:03:19.280
<v Speaker 1>to do, what they're displaying is is a is recognized

0:03:19.280 --> 0:03:24.160
<v Speaker 1>by psychology. It's a it's something called reactants. And with reactants,

0:03:25.000 --> 0:03:29.160
<v Speaker 1>people oppose what they're being told out of a sense

0:03:29.200 --> 0:03:33.639
<v Speaker 1>of independence or protecting their sense of autonomy. But for

0:03:33.680 --> 0:03:36.880
<v Speaker 1>whatever reason, even if it's not in their own best interests,

0:03:36.920 --> 0:03:39.680
<v Speaker 1>they'll do something that's the opposite of what they're being told.

0:03:39.720 --> 0:03:44.360
<v Speaker 1>That's reactants. Reverse psychology is priming that pump in order

0:03:44.400 --> 0:03:47.720
<v Speaker 1>to manipulate somebody into doing what you want. Yeah, and

0:03:47.920 --> 0:03:49.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the examples given in this article are

0:03:49.880 --> 0:03:53.760
<v Speaker 1>very ham fisted, but I'm going to use them anyway.

0:03:53.960 --> 0:03:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Like this first one is just a pure definition of

0:03:56.800 --> 0:03:59.520
<v Speaker 1>what it could be. Is Uh, a wife wants her

0:03:59.520 --> 0:04:02.760
<v Speaker 1>bedroom ainted, so she asked the husband, you know, can

0:04:02.760 --> 0:04:04.360
<v Speaker 1>you please paint the bedroom? And he's like, no, I

0:04:04.360 --> 0:04:06.920
<v Speaker 1>want to paint the bedroom, until she finally goes, you

0:04:06.920 --> 0:04:10.080
<v Speaker 1>know what, Uh, you're not such a great painter. Anyway,

0:04:10.240 --> 0:04:11.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna paint in the bedroom because I'll do a

0:04:11.760 --> 0:04:15.680
<v Speaker 1>better job. And then in this article, off the couch,

0:04:15.720 --> 0:04:21.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to the Sherwyn Williams right now, go everywhere

0:04:21.880 --> 0:04:25.040
<v Speaker 1>he pauses the football game. Uh. So that's the just

0:04:25.080 --> 0:04:28.920
<v Speaker 1>a very bare bones example of how, um, someone might

0:04:29.000 --> 0:04:32.760
<v Speaker 1>try and manipulate their husband or wife, yeah, into doing

0:04:32.760 --> 0:04:36.480
<v Speaker 1>a chore instead of having just a grown up relationship

0:04:36.520 --> 0:04:39.200
<v Speaker 1>where you tell your husband maybe we should talk about

0:04:39.200 --> 0:04:42.000
<v Speaker 1>painting the bedroom and he goes, I'll entertain that because

0:04:42.040 --> 0:04:44.880
<v Speaker 1>you're a valid human and you have opinions and needs

0:04:44.880 --> 0:04:47.359
<v Speaker 1>and what's and if you don't do this, you're in

0:04:47.360 --> 0:04:52.400
<v Speaker 1>a big, big trouble. Yeah, it's not just adults, though,

0:04:52.760 --> 0:04:57.080
<v Speaker 1>is it, Josh? What that reverse psychology is used on No,

0:04:57.680 --> 0:05:01.640
<v Speaker 1>typically it's used on children. UM, something as simple as

0:05:01.640 --> 0:05:04.680
<v Speaker 1>saying like, UM, I'll bet you can't finish washing the

0:05:04.720 --> 0:05:08.120
<v Speaker 1>dishes before you know your TV show comes on. That's

0:05:08.160 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 1>a good positive use, yes, UM. And psychologists who do

0:05:13.520 --> 0:05:15.800
<v Speaker 1>recognize and talk about this kind of stuff because it

0:05:15.920 --> 0:05:17.960
<v Speaker 1>is worth talking about, and there is a certain amount

0:05:17.960 --> 0:05:22.400
<v Speaker 1>of service among psychologists too. UM. I guess talk to

0:05:22.520 --> 0:05:25.760
<v Speaker 1>parents about the use of reverse psychology UM, because it

0:05:25.880 --> 0:05:28.800
<v Speaker 1>isn't necessarily something you want to use a lot. You

0:05:28.839 --> 0:05:31.479
<v Speaker 1>want to use it sparingly, and there are certain UM

0:05:31.600 --> 0:05:34.720
<v Speaker 1>qualifiers that you need to use, like, for example, you

0:05:34.760 --> 0:05:41.039
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't use negative reinforcement or negative reverse psychology, right, And

0:05:41.080 --> 0:05:43.640
<v Speaker 1>this was actually a pretty good example. I think, UM,

0:05:43.880 --> 0:05:46.479
<v Speaker 1>like you'r you want your kid to hang their bike

0:05:46.560 --> 0:05:49.360
<v Speaker 1>up in the bike rack above the cars in the garage,

0:05:49.720 --> 0:05:53.080
<v Speaker 1>So negative reverse psychology would be if you really want

0:05:53.120 --> 0:05:55.080
<v Speaker 1>them to do that, for you to say, you know what,

0:05:55.240 --> 0:05:57.559
<v Speaker 1>let me do it, because you're so dumb you'll drop

0:05:57.600 --> 0:06:02.159
<v Speaker 1>the bike on the car. What kind of monster would

0:06:02.200 --> 0:06:05.839
<v Speaker 1>do that? Apparently they're out there, But that is a

0:06:05.920 --> 0:06:08.440
<v Speaker 1>great example of negative reverse psychology. You really want your

0:06:08.440 --> 0:06:11.000
<v Speaker 1>son to hang that bike up but you end up

0:06:11.160 --> 0:06:14.320
<v Speaker 1>insulting him in the process of trying him to get

0:06:14.480 --> 0:06:16.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, get him to do something right. And then

0:06:16.000 --> 0:06:18.599
<v Speaker 1>the kid's self esteem is in the toilet and it

0:06:18.680 --> 0:06:23.359
<v Speaker 1>spoils around counterclockwise if it's a kid from the Northern

0:06:23.360 --> 0:06:27.240
<v Speaker 1>hemisphere and clockwise in the Southern hemisphere, which is not true,

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:30.159
<v Speaker 1>by the way. And I also don't think I didn't

0:06:30.200 --> 0:06:32.000
<v Speaker 1>even find this in there. This is just me. I

0:06:32.040 --> 0:06:34.560
<v Speaker 1>don't think you should put your children against one another either,

0:06:34.680 --> 0:06:37.960
<v Speaker 1>Like you know, I bet you can't finish your green

0:06:38.000 --> 0:06:42.440
<v Speaker 1>beans like your big brother can. Um. I grew up

0:06:42.440 --> 0:06:44.440
<v Speaker 1>in a family with a big brother that was way

0:06:44.480 --> 0:06:49.039
<v Speaker 1>better than me. The way smarter and better looking beans

0:06:49.040 --> 0:06:50.960
<v Speaker 1>really took effect on that one. No, but I have

0:06:51.040 --> 0:06:54.000
<v Speaker 1>to say my parents never compared us or never expected

0:06:54.000 --> 0:06:57.040
<v Speaker 1>me to be him, which was great. Uh. They probably

0:06:57.040 --> 0:06:59.320
<v Speaker 1>did it accidentally, but they did it behind your back

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:02.360
<v Speaker 1>maybe so, but at any rate, always they go to

0:07:02.440 --> 0:07:05.880
<v Speaker 1>bed and be like, I really like that Scott. He'll

0:07:05.920 --> 0:07:07.480
<v Speaker 1>tell you what he did today. Oh, I'm a big

0:07:07.520 --> 0:07:11.320
<v Speaker 1>Scott fan myself. That was all the buzz behind the scene,

0:07:12.000 --> 0:07:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Scott Scott. So some more recommendations if you're a parent

0:07:15.800 --> 0:07:20.440
<v Speaker 1>using reverse psychology is that, Um, you again, you don't

0:07:20.480 --> 0:07:22.480
<v Speaker 1>want to use it too often because even a dumb

0:07:22.520 --> 0:07:25.080
<v Speaker 1>kid can see through what you're doing eventually. Yeah, and

0:07:25.080 --> 0:07:28.080
<v Speaker 1>they're going to think you're a manipulator. Yes, you don't

0:07:28.120 --> 0:07:30.920
<v Speaker 1>want your child to think of you as manipulative. Even

0:07:30.920 --> 0:07:32.960
<v Speaker 1>if you are. You want to very at least manipulate

0:07:33.000 --> 0:07:35.960
<v Speaker 1>them into not thinking that. So you want to be

0:07:36.440 --> 0:07:39.880
<v Speaker 1>smart about using reverse psychology. And then there's a whole

0:07:39.920 --> 0:07:44.880
<v Speaker 1>school of thought among some parental advice columnists that say

0:07:45.120 --> 0:07:48.480
<v Speaker 1>you shouldn't use reverse psychology at all. It's a really

0:07:48.560 --> 0:07:51.720
<v Speaker 1>bad idea across the board. It's a form of dishonesty.

0:07:51.920 --> 0:07:54.440
<v Speaker 1>I think. Yeah, and what your kids do pick up

0:07:54.480 --> 0:07:57.679
<v Speaker 1>on this, they will they will be like, well, my

0:07:57.680 --> 0:08:00.640
<v Speaker 1>my parent doesn't really mean anything they say. It will

0:08:00.720 --> 0:08:03.560
<v Speaker 1>also teach your teaching your kid not to listen to you.

0:08:03.760 --> 0:08:05.880
<v Speaker 1>And there's a good example of that in this article

0:08:05.920 --> 0:08:09.160
<v Speaker 1>where if you really wish that your son would cut

0:08:09.160 --> 0:08:13.760
<v Speaker 1>his long hippie hair, um, a type of verse psychology

0:08:13.800 --> 0:08:16.280
<v Speaker 1>would be to come up to him and stroke it

0:08:16.320 --> 0:08:18.160
<v Speaker 1>and be like, I hope you never cut this hair.

0:08:18.200 --> 0:08:21.520
<v Speaker 1>It looks so good, and then the kid sure, And

0:08:21.560 --> 0:08:23.680
<v Speaker 1>then maybe because he's creeped out. The kid goes to

0:08:23.720 --> 0:08:26.040
<v Speaker 1>the barber the next day, has his hair cut and

0:08:26.120 --> 0:08:29.680
<v Speaker 1>joins the army. You know, so you got what you

0:08:29.720 --> 0:08:33.440
<v Speaker 1>wanted your kids out of the house. He joined the army. Um.

0:08:33.520 --> 0:08:37.200
<v Speaker 1>But you also have taught him to not listen to you,

0:08:37.480 --> 0:08:40.720
<v Speaker 1>especially if you praise how good his hair looks um

0:08:40.760 --> 0:08:43.560
<v Speaker 1>after he cut it. So not only do you not

0:08:43.640 --> 0:08:46.520
<v Speaker 1>mean what you say, you're also kind of wishy washy

0:08:46.559 --> 0:08:48.200
<v Speaker 1>because you like the long hair, but now you like

0:08:48.280 --> 0:08:51.640
<v Speaker 1>the short hair, and you're praising the kid for having

0:08:51.679 --> 0:08:54.560
<v Speaker 1>done the opposite of what you told him to. That's

0:08:55.080 --> 0:08:58.560
<v Speaker 1>so this is all all this combined. It's it's basically

0:08:58.600 --> 0:09:02.679
<v Speaker 1>it sounds like lazy parenting, yeah, you know, or or

0:09:03.280 --> 0:09:09.120
<v Speaker 1>cold calculated terrible parenting. Yeah. Psychopathy Yeah that. Uh. Let's

0:09:09.120 --> 0:09:12.360
<v Speaker 1>take a break here and we'll come back and finish up. Now,

0:09:12.360 --> 0:09:14.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm just kidding. We'll come back and talk a little

0:09:14.120 --> 0:09:36.040
<v Speaker 1>bit more about who might be affected by reverse psychology.

0:09:37.520 --> 0:09:42.160
<v Speaker 1>All right, Experts say, if you're a narcissist, man, I

0:09:42.240 --> 0:09:46.119
<v Speaker 1>really hate that. I saw that in this article. Experts. Yeah, experts,

0:09:46.840 --> 0:09:48.920
<v Speaker 1>but they do say, Josh, if you're a narcissist, or

0:09:48.920 --> 0:09:52.200
<v Speaker 1>if you're a control freak check or if you're Type

0:09:52.200 --> 0:09:55.000
<v Speaker 1>A that you might be more susceptible to being manipulated

0:09:55.640 --> 0:10:01.240
<v Speaker 1>by a um reverse psychologist. Why is that? Well, because um,

0:10:01.600 --> 0:10:04.600
<v Speaker 1>you want that control. Yeah, and that's ultimately what it

0:10:04.600 --> 0:10:07.360
<v Speaker 1>comes down to. So like, none of this will possibly

0:10:07.440 --> 0:10:10.600
<v Speaker 1>work if the person doesn't feel that their autonomy and

0:10:10.800 --> 0:10:15.120
<v Speaker 1>sense of freedom and sense of self destiny is not

0:10:15.240 --> 0:10:18.320
<v Speaker 1>at stake here. That's what you're doing, is you're you're

0:10:19.360 --> 0:10:23.720
<v Speaker 1>you are, You're assaulting that person's ability to choose, and

0:10:23.760 --> 0:10:26.439
<v Speaker 1>so they're going to choose the opposite to reassert themselves.

0:10:26.800 --> 0:10:30.960
<v Speaker 1>And apparently people who are type a's are more likely

0:10:31.120 --> 0:10:34.640
<v Speaker 1>to sense that their autonomy is being tread upon a

0:10:34.679 --> 0:10:38.160
<v Speaker 1>more passive person that type B, which we should do

0:10:38.200 --> 0:10:40.920
<v Speaker 1>an episode on that where that came from type A

0:10:41.000 --> 0:10:46.760
<v Speaker 1>type and definitely we should do one on personality inventories. UM,

0:10:46.880 --> 0:10:49.880
<v Speaker 1>but the type BE people, you really shouldn't use reverse

0:10:49.880 --> 0:10:52.200
<v Speaker 1>psychology on them because they'll end up doing what you ask.

0:10:53.200 --> 0:10:55.320
<v Speaker 1>So you're you're asking them to do the opposite of

0:10:55.320 --> 0:10:57.000
<v Speaker 1>what you want and then they'll just go do that,

0:10:57.040 --> 0:10:58.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, yeah, just asking what you wanted to do,

0:10:58.880 --> 0:11:00.720
<v Speaker 1>and they might go, yeah, great, I'll do that right.

0:11:00.920 --> 0:11:04.160
<v Speaker 1>The problem is people who use for psychology are the

0:11:04.200 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 1>same people who who worry that the person they're talking

0:11:06.920 --> 0:11:09.680
<v Speaker 1>to is not going to do what they want. You

0:11:09.720 --> 0:11:13.080
<v Speaker 1>know what I mean, I guess it's not true. Uh.

0:11:13.160 --> 0:11:18.200
<v Speaker 1>There's a doctor, a psychologist named Janette Raymond and Los Angeles,

0:11:18.400 --> 0:11:22.319
<v Speaker 1>of course, who says that it's not so much I

0:11:22.360 --> 0:11:26.679
<v Speaker 1>don't know. It's not so much the personality type though,

0:11:26.679 --> 0:11:29.199
<v Speaker 1>but the dynamics of the relationship, which makes a lot

0:11:29.200 --> 0:11:32.280
<v Speaker 1>of sense. It does. Um. I also read an article

0:11:32.320 --> 0:11:36.800
<v Speaker 1>in Psychology today on this about that context has a

0:11:36.840 --> 0:11:38.839
<v Speaker 1>lot to do with it to whether it works or not.

0:11:39.040 --> 0:11:41.080
<v Speaker 1>And this was a two thousand eleven posts. So it's

0:11:41.360 --> 0:11:43.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of charming that the guy uses Charlie Sheen and

0:11:43.720 --> 0:11:49.160
<v Speaker 1>rehab as an example. He's saying, he's saying that, UM

0:11:49.559 --> 0:11:52.480
<v Speaker 1>saying something that like if one of Charlie Sheen's friends

0:11:52.600 --> 0:11:54.840
<v Speaker 1>had said to him, like, don't go to rehab. You

0:11:54.880 --> 0:11:58.080
<v Speaker 1>totally don't need rehab, don't go, Charlie Sheen very likely

0:11:58.120 --> 0:12:00.360
<v Speaker 1>would have been like, awesome, Yeah, you're right, I agree

0:12:00.400 --> 0:12:04.880
<v Speaker 1>with you. Because number one, his desire to not be

0:12:04.960 --> 0:12:08.800
<v Speaker 1>in rehabbing to do tons of cocaine, and his desire

0:12:08.880 --> 0:12:11.640
<v Speaker 1>to be proven to prove that he doesn't need help

0:12:11.960 --> 0:12:15.679
<v Speaker 1>would definitely trump any petty fleeting desire to prove that

0:12:15.720 --> 0:12:20.120
<v Speaker 1>person wrong and and regain a sense of autonomy. What

0:12:20.200 --> 0:12:23.160
<v Speaker 1>a weird time that was. It really was. He was

0:12:23.280 --> 0:12:26.120
<v Speaker 1>the most famous person in the world for about a month. Yeah,

0:12:27.000 --> 0:12:30.240
<v Speaker 1>didn't you go see his tour? No, okay, I read

0:12:30.280 --> 0:12:35.160
<v Speaker 1>about it. I didn't see Mike Tyson. Yes, Tyson two

0:12:35.200 --> 0:12:37.880
<v Speaker 1>do very different things. I'm not equating those two. Someone

0:12:37.960 --> 0:12:41.320
<v Speaker 1>I knew went to that stupid Charlie sheensur and apparently

0:12:41.360 --> 0:12:44.520
<v Speaker 1>the people who went were really unhappy because he tried

0:12:44.559 --> 0:12:47.320
<v Speaker 1>to make it like just some normal thing. You're like, no,

0:12:47.520 --> 0:12:50.120
<v Speaker 1>tell us all your drugs, like a legitimate stage show,

0:12:50.679 --> 0:12:53.560
<v Speaker 1>which it was not right, And like he wouldn't talk

0:12:53.600 --> 0:12:56.839
<v Speaker 1>about any of his drug stories or sex stories or

0:12:56.880 --> 0:13:01.000
<v Speaker 1>anything like that. He was just basically it's just doing, uh,

0:13:01.559 --> 0:13:04.200
<v Speaker 1>just talking. And yeah, he got booed a lot. Yeah,

0:13:04.200 --> 0:13:07.439
<v Speaker 1>And I think even now Charlie Sheen is like, that

0:13:07.600 --> 0:13:10.440
<v Speaker 1>was that was weird? Well, why did do all that stuff?

0:13:11.200 --> 0:13:14.200
<v Speaker 1>He just came to Yeah, just I think he even

0:13:14.280 --> 0:13:19.160
<v Speaker 1>admits what a what a dumb period in my life. Um,

0:13:19.240 --> 0:13:21.960
<v Speaker 1>I could talk about that guy all day. I don't

0:13:21.960 --> 0:13:24.800
<v Speaker 1>think we should do with Charlie Sheen episode. Okay, I

0:13:24.840 --> 0:13:26.880
<v Speaker 1>like him. Platoon I think is one of the best

0:13:26.920 --> 0:13:29.440
<v Speaker 1>movies ever made, and he did really well in it. Yeah.

0:13:29.480 --> 0:13:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Good movie. Men at Work. I never saw it. You

0:13:33.400 --> 0:13:37.440
<v Speaker 1>have to see Men at Work, do I? Yeah? Casablanca

0:13:37.559 --> 0:13:40.720
<v Speaker 1>first though, sure, okay, just to appease the people in

0:13:40.800 --> 0:13:43.520
<v Speaker 1>podcast land. If he asked me personally, you could watch

0:13:43.559 --> 0:13:46.079
<v Speaker 1>him at the same time. Um. They give a really

0:13:46.080 --> 0:13:49.600
<v Speaker 1>bad example to me in here about Julian Ossange, which

0:13:49.760 --> 0:13:53.880
<v Speaker 1>of wiki leaks. This is like, this almost made me, Um,

0:13:54.080 --> 0:13:56.960
<v Speaker 1>just throw my laptop away while I was reading this. Yeah,

0:13:57.080 --> 0:14:01.800
<v Speaker 1>it said basically, um an examlause. If Julian Assange had

0:14:01.840 --> 0:14:05.440
<v Speaker 1>been not been told to stop, if basically the US

0:14:05.520 --> 0:14:09.280
<v Speaker 1>government had said fine, just go do it, he would

0:14:09.280 --> 0:14:12.120
<v Speaker 1>have lost interest and and never would have published all

0:14:12.160 --> 0:14:17.080
<v Speaker 1>those diplomatic cables in this article. Terrible, terrible example. Yeah.

0:14:17.080 --> 0:14:20.320
<v Speaker 1>I actually just scratched it out. Are not you with

0:14:20.360 --> 0:14:23.200
<v Speaker 1>a pin? Looked like a knife. You just went back

0:14:23.200 --> 0:14:27.600
<v Speaker 1>and forth like carving it up. Man. I really can't

0:14:27.600 --> 0:14:30.800
<v Speaker 1>believe it made it in there. So children though, Um.

0:14:30.880 --> 0:14:33.360
<v Speaker 1>One of the big reasons kids, Uh, it works on

0:14:33.440 --> 0:14:37.800
<v Speaker 1>kids is because if you're a parent, um, and I'll

0:14:37.840 --> 0:14:41.360
<v Speaker 1>find this out at some point, not yet obviously, but um,

0:14:41.560 --> 0:14:47.480
<v Speaker 1>kids it seems like they're innately um, interested in doing

0:14:47.600 --> 0:14:50.760
<v Speaker 1>the opposite of whatever you say. Yeah. And plus they're

0:14:50.800 --> 0:14:53.880
<v Speaker 1>also their little brains are developing their what you call

0:14:54.080 --> 0:14:56.840
<v Speaker 1>naive in a lot of ways. So it does tend

0:14:56.880 --> 0:14:59.280
<v Speaker 1>to work on children. Again, like we said, you want

0:14:59.320 --> 0:15:02.720
<v Speaker 1>to use this worryingly if at all, UM, But there

0:15:02.760 --> 0:15:04.880
<v Speaker 1>have been studies, There have been real studies on this

0:15:04.960 --> 0:15:07.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of stuff. We finally get to the studies. So

0:15:07.560 --> 0:15:12.560
<v Speaker 1>the study of reverse psychology is phenomenon um of reactance

0:15:12.640 --> 0:15:16.080
<v Speaker 1>being primed, right. Um. Really kind of starts in the seventies.

0:15:16.080 --> 0:15:19.640
<v Speaker 1>But there's this very famous UM study from two that

0:15:19.680 --> 0:15:23.040
<v Speaker 1>was in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. I

0:15:23.040 --> 0:15:30.880
<v Speaker 1>think bulletin maybe in there. Anyway, this is UM. The

0:15:30.880 --> 0:15:35.120
<v Speaker 1>the in this study found that children who were who

0:15:35.120 --> 0:15:37.400
<v Speaker 1>were given free reign to play with a bunch of

0:15:37.440 --> 0:15:43.000
<v Speaker 1>toys except one that toy became super popular. Um. But

0:15:43.040 --> 0:15:45.000
<v Speaker 1>there you know, they're studying things. They had to put

0:15:45.040 --> 0:15:48.600
<v Speaker 1>it down on paper eventually. UM. They had another study

0:15:48.840 --> 0:15:52.440
<v Speaker 1>UM or a very similar one, had kids rate a

0:15:52.480 --> 0:15:55.400
<v Speaker 1>handful of toys that were in this room, and then

0:15:55.440 --> 0:15:57.200
<v Speaker 1>the researchers went back and picked the one that fell

0:15:57.280 --> 0:15:58.440
<v Speaker 1>right in the middle. I think it was a toy

0:15:58.520 --> 0:16:04.360
<v Speaker 1>motorcycle or something UM and with a new group said

0:16:05.440 --> 0:16:07.680
<v Speaker 1>this is like, you can play with all these toys

0:16:07.680 --> 0:16:10.720
<v Speaker 1>except for the motorcycle. And then later on they formed

0:16:11.040 --> 0:16:14.800
<v Speaker 1>yet another new group with new UM people running the show,

0:16:15.280 --> 0:16:17.400
<v Speaker 1>and some of those same kids that had been told

0:16:17.400 --> 0:16:20.320
<v Speaker 1>no to the motorcycle were suddenly very interested in the motorcycle.

0:16:20.600 --> 0:16:23.520
<v Speaker 1>So this has been documented, this has been UM looked

0:16:23.520 --> 0:16:26.680
<v Speaker 1>at over and over again UM. But they don't exactly

0:16:26.720 --> 0:16:29.440
<v Speaker 1>know what the mechanisms are behind it, and we will

0:16:29.840 --> 0:16:54.400
<v Speaker 1>dive into that right after this. So before we move on,

0:16:54.600 --> 0:16:57.800
<v Speaker 1>I want to point out to adults out there, it's

0:16:57.880 --> 0:17:00.840
<v Speaker 1>very normal and even kind of cute when there's two

0:17:00.920 --> 0:17:05.480
<v Speaker 1>kids playing with two different things and one kid says

0:17:05.720 --> 0:17:08.639
<v Speaker 1>at some point, well, no, I want that one because

0:17:08.640 --> 0:17:11.080
<v Speaker 1>they're playing with that toy, so I want that toy.

0:17:11.119 --> 0:17:14.359
<v Speaker 1>It looks like way more fun. Uh, it's not cute

0:17:14.359 --> 0:17:17.399
<v Speaker 1>when you're an adult. No, and I see it happen

0:17:17.480 --> 0:17:20.040
<v Speaker 1>where you know, I want what that person has, why

0:17:20.040 --> 0:17:24.120
<v Speaker 1>don't why don't I have that? And people there are

0:17:24.240 --> 0:17:27.840
<v Speaker 1>plenty of advertisers out there that use that, that manipulate that.

0:17:28.320 --> 0:17:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Some of them go to um hysterical lengths, Like there's

0:17:31.880 --> 0:17:35.480
<v Speaker 1>a Patagonia ad that had a picture of a Patagonia

0:17:35.600 --> 0:17:38.080
<v Speaker 1>jacket and it just said, do not buy this jacket.

0:17:39.480 --> 0:17:41.480
<v Speaker 1>I think it was a little tongue in cheek. Well

0:17:41.520 --> 0:17:44.040
<v Speaker 1>you know what actually did if it was tongue in cheek.

0:17:44.280 --> 0:17:48.200
<v Speaker 1>I posted this article, um what was yesterday? It will

0:17:48.200 --> 0:17:50.399
<v Speaker 1>have been a couple of weeks ago on Facebook on

0:17:50.400 --> 0:17:54.240
<v Speaker 1>our Facebook page. One before you sent it as a

0:17:54.680 --> 0:17:57.720
<v Speaker 1>what a coincidence? All right, and I said I would

0:17:57.720 --> 0:18:02.080
<v Speaker 1>advise you to not read this article like ha, And uh,

0:18:02.600 --> 0:18:04.800
<v Speaker 1>it did pretty well. I didn't really got a lot

0:18:04.800 --> 0:18:06.600
<v Speaker 1>of shares, and a lot of people seem to read it,

0:18:06.920 --> 0:18:10.159
<v Speaker 1>and most people were like, oh, very funny. But I

0:18:10.200 --> 0:18:13.800
<v Speaker 1>don't know, did it work probably. I'm almost sorry they

0:18:13.800 --> 0:18:16.520
<v Speaker 1>read the article now, But but I think it's it

0:18:16.680 --> 0:18:19.440
<v Speaker 1>probably got a lot of reads because it is something

0:18:19.480 --> 0:18:22.719
<v Speaker 1>that's so ingrained in popular culture, you know, reverse psychology.

0:18:22.760 --> 0:18:26.000
<v Speaker 1>It's used all over the place, either expressly, like there's

0:18:26.040 --> 0:18:29.920
<v Speaker 1>a very famous Simpsons episode where Homer's reading a parenting

0:18:29.920 --> 0:18:33.399
<v Speaker 1>book and his brain says, um, don't you get it,

0:18:33.400 --> 0:18:37.200
<v Speaker 1>you gotta use reverse psychology. Homer's like, that sounds really hard.

0:18:37.240 --> 0:18:39.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm not doing that, and his brain goes, well, fine,

0:18:39.440 --> 0:18:43.680
<v Speaker 1>don't use reverse callogy goes okay, I will and uh.

0:18:43.840 --> 0:18:47.199
<v Speaker 1>I saw another example Tom and Jerry UM when Jerry

0:18:47.240 --> 0:18:50.080
<v Speaker 1>has a bomb and they're passing it back and forth,

0:18:50.119 --> 0:18:52.479
<v Speaker 1>and then all of a sudden, Jerry changes and suddenly

0:18:52.520 --> 0:18:54.520
<v Speaker 1>grabs the bomb back like he wants it, and that

0:18:54.560 --> 0:18:57.080
<v Speaker 1>makes Tom want the bomb, and Tom of course ends

0:18:57.119 --> 0:19:00.600
<v Speaker 1>up holding the bomb while it explodes. Reverse cycle. And

0:19:00.720 --> 0:19:04.600
<v Speaker 1>actually the same lady that made the terrible, terrible example

0:19:04.680 --> 0:19:08.639
<v Speaker 1>of UM, Julian Julians does point out that this is

0:19:09.040 --> 0:19:13.080
<v Speaker 1>it almost enters the realm of folklore reverse psychology does,

0:19:13.840 --> 0:19:17.159
<v Speaker 1>but there is something going on there. And again it

0:19:17.280 --> 0:19:20.600
<v Speaker 1>is based on reactants, which is somebody doing the opposite

0:19:20.600 --> 0:19:23.440
<v Speaker 1>of what's presented to them, breaking a rule something like that,

0:19:23.720 --> 0:19:26.240
<v Speaker 1>but we don't really know what's behind it right. Well,

0:19:26.480 --> 0:19:29.040
<v Speaker 1>one another quick example is UM. And this wasn't even

0:19:29.119 --> 0:19:31.480
<v Speaker 1>us trying to use reverse psychology, but during some of

0:19:31.480 --> 0:19:36.560
<v Speaker 1>our UM like necrotizing fasciitists or maggot therapy. When we're like,

0:19:36.680 --> 0:19:40.120
<v Speaker 1>don't go to Google images and look this up. Invariably

0:19:40.160 --> 0:19:42.000
<v Speaker 1>we have people to emails like why do you have

0:19:42.040 --> 0:19:44.040
<v Speaker 1>to say that? Because that's the first thing I did

0:19:44.320 --> 0:19:46.800
<v Speaker 1>and it was disgusting. That's why I spell it correctly

0:19:46.840 --> 0:19:48.800
<v Speaker 1>because I know people are not going to listen to it.

0:19:49.000 --> 0:19:51.760
<v Speaker 1>But it's not us saying like I really want them

0:19:51.760 --> 0:19:53.159
<v Speaker 1>to go look at this. We're gonna tell them not to,

0:19:53.560 --> 0:19:55.520
<v Speaker 1>like we really mean it. Don't go look it up.

0:19:55.600 --> 0:20:00.639
<v Speaker 1>It's disgusting. Yeah, ah, you sort of do a little okay. Um,

0:20:00.680 --> 0:20:05.160
<v Speaker 1>so uh, there there have been there's been research into

0:20:05.200 --> 0:20:08.240
<v Speaker 1>trying to figure out what what's going on here? Why

0:20:08.240 --> 0:20:13.040
<v Speaker 1>do people do this? Um? And uh Esther inglish Askell,

0:20:13.119 --> 0:20:17.679
<v Speaker 1>who writes over I O nine great site. Um, she

0:20:18.320 --> 0:20:20.960
<v Speaker 1>wrote a little post on this and is talking about how,

0:20:21.400 --> 0:20:24.840
<v Speaker 1>um is it is it that people are rebelling against

0:20:24.840 --> 0:20:28.760
<v Speaker 1>authority to to establish their own autonomy again or their

0:20:28.800 --> 0:20:31.840
<v Speaker 1>sense of autonomy, or is it that they're trying to

0:20:32.160 --> 0:20:34.600
<v Speaker 1>they're curious, their curiosity is peaked. And she makes a

0:20:34.640 --> 0:20:38.720
<v Speaker 1>really good case for curiosity being piqued by saying, if

0:20:38.760 --> 0:20:42.240
<v Speaker 1>you put forbidden on the door. A lot of people

0:20:42.240 --> 0:20:44.000
<v Speaker 1>are going to go right through that door to see

0:20:44.080 --> 0:20:46.240
<v Speaker 1>what is on the other side of this forbidden door.

0:20:46.320 --> 0:20:48.720
<v Speaker 1>I'd be one of them. But if you put on

0:20:48.800 --> 0:20:52.639
<v Speaker 1>that same door a science is forbidden colon toilet overflow,

0:20:53.080 --> 0:20:55.119
<v Speaker 1>people are gonna be like, I'm not going in there. No,

0:20:56.800 --> 0:21:00.360
<v Speaker 1>there probably donuts in there, and okay, so so you're

0:21:00.359 --> 0:21:03.080
<v Speaker 1>the suspicious type. But if you take it on its face,

0:21:03.119 --> 0:21:05.280
<v Speaker 1>she makes a good point. Yes, some people would be

0:21:05.320 --> 0:21:08.200
<v Speaker 1>repelled by the idea of a disgusting, overflowing toilet in there,

0:21:08.480 --> 0:21:11.879
<v Speaker 1>but other people might have their curiosity is squashed and

0:21:11.920 --> 0:21:14.360
<v Speaker 1>so they wouldn't need to transgress. So it's a lack

0:21:14.400 --> 0:21:18.800
<v Speaker 1>of information in a curiosity. And apparently other studies kind

0:21:18.840 --> 0:21:23.040
<v Speaker 1>of bolster this idea because they show that the the

0:21:23.040 --> 0:21:29.080
<v Speaker 1>the reactants is more intense, the more arbitrary a rule seems,

0:21:29.119 --> 0:21:31.360
<v Speaker 1>so that people are saying, like, wait, why, I don't

0:21:31.440 --> 0:21:34.399
<v Speaker 1>understand this. It doesn't make any sense. It seems to

0:21:34.440 --> 0:21:38.879
<v Speaker 1>be one component of it um and another component of it, however,

0:21:38.920 --> 0:21:42.679
<v Speaker 1>seems to be just disobeying. There's another study that was

0:21:43.119 --> 0:21:47.479
<v Speaker 1>I think in conjunction. In that study of teenagers and

0:21:47.520 --> 0:21:51.360
<v Speaker 1>it found that, um, these a group of teens were

0:21:51.359 --> 0:21:54.440
<v Speaker 1>told do not cheat on this test. It's really important

0:21:54.440 --> 0:21:57.399
<v Speaker 1>you don't cheat on this test, and not like all

0:21:57.440 --> 0:22:00.119
<v Speaker 1>the other tests. Yeah, I guess which you can cheat on.

0:22:00.320 --> 0:22:03.280
<v Speaker 1>And this group was induced to cheat more often more

0:22:03.320 --> 0:22:06.240
<v Speaker 1>frequently than the control group who weren't told not to

0:22:06.320 --> 0:22:09.040
<v Speaker 1>cheat on this. Yeah. What's the point of that. I

0:22:09.080 --> 0:22:11.920
<v Speaker 1>guess it's just I don't know, that's just finding boundaries

0:22:12.000 --> 0:22:14.359
<v Speaker 1>or or you could also make the case that they're

0:22:14.600 --> 0:22:16.560
<v Speaker 1>they're trying to see what happens if they do cheat

0:22:17.000 --> 0:22:19.840
<v Speaker 1>because they're curious. So the jury is definitely still out

0:22:19.880 --> 0:22:24.080
<v Speaker 1>on what's behind reactants. Yeah. Um. We talked a little

0:22:24.080 --> 0:22:26.520
<v Speaker 1>bit about how business. Um. I think they said in

0:22:26.520 --> 0:22:29.400
<v Speaker 1>the article that sales is a common way in business

0:22:29.400 --> 0:22:32.879
<v Speaker 1>that you can use reverse psychology. Like the car salesman

0:22:32.960 --> 0:22:36.560
<v Speaker 1>who shows all the cars except for the most expensive one,

0:22:36.560 --> 0:22:37.800
<v Speaker 1>and they're like, well, why don't you show us that?

0:22:37.920 --> 0:22:39.960
<v Speaker 1>And he's like, well, you know, I think that's probably

0:22:39.960 --> 0:22:42.919
<v Speaker 1>out of your price range. And then if you're you know,

0:22:43.200 --> 0:22:46.639
<v Speaker 1>an adult living in a child's body or a child

0:22:46.640 --> 0:22:48.959
<v Speaker 1>living in an adults body, like big, yeah, you go,

0:22:49.320 --> 0:22:53.040
<v Speaker 1>well no, let me see that car I can afford that, Yeah,

0:22:53.119 --> 0:22:55.840
<v Speaker 1>what do you mean? And the goofers family who's always

0:22:55.840 --> 0:22:59.360
<v Speaker 1>broke drives off in their brand new car. Or the

0:23:00.040 --> 0:23:03.240
<v Speaker 1>lationship example they gave, like if a boyfriends like, you're

0:23:03.320 --> 0:23:07.480
<v Speaker 1>becoming kind of clany to the girlfriend, and the girl

0:23:07.520 --> 0:23:11.200
<v Speaker 1>immediate is like, yeah, you know, I think we should

0:23:11.240 --> 0:23:16.359
<v Speaker 1>spend some time apart. Actually we should even date other people. Boom,

0:23:16.480 --> 0:23:18.639
<v Speaker 1>the guy all of a sudden says, wait, wait a minute,

0:23:19.000 --> 0:23:22.439
<v Speaker 1>what do you mean date other people? So some of

0:23:22.440 --> 0:23:25.080
<v Speaker 1>that harmless stuff in a relationship happens, I'm sure, but

0:23:26.280 --> 0:23:28.159
<v Speaker 1>that's not what we were talking about earlier, with like

0:23:28.200 --> 0:23:32.680
<v Speaker 1>truly toxic relationship malation and manipulation. That's that's a different thing.

0:23:32.800 --> 0:23:34.960
<v Speaker 1>They're different levels of this. Okay, that's on the same

0:23:35.000 --> 0:23:39.359
<v Speaker 1>spectrum for sure, Uh, but it all it also uh

0:23:39.880 --> 0:23:43.960
<v Speaker 1>levels all the way up to real UM therapy called

0:23:44.119 --> 0:23:50.239
<v Speaker 1>paradoxical intervention, and UM psychologists actually say reverse psychology is

0:23:50.800 --> 0:23:53.240
<v Speaker 1>the media inventedat That's not what we call it. It's

0:23:53.240 --> 0:23:56.160
<v Speaker 1>an actual therapy that some people say is not ethical

0:23:56.200 --> 0:24:00.359
<v Speaker 1>to use. Other doctors say, no, it's just fine to use. Yeah.

0:24:00.400 --> 0:24:03.959
<v Speaker 1>I actually came across a I think a paper from

0:24:04.000 --> 0:24:09.880
<v Speaker 1>the nineties or something about the ethics of using paradoxical intervention. Right,

0:24:10.240 --> 0:24:12.320
<v Speaker 1>this does help or it can help, And the whole

0:24:12.359 --> 0:24:14.760
<v Speaker 1>idea of it, it's not really reverse psychology. It's just

0:24:14.800 --> 0:24:18.320
<v Speaker 1>about the closest thing psychology has to reverse psychology, where

0:24:19.119 --> 0:24:23.439
<v Speaker 1>you are telling a patient to go and purposefully do

0:24:23.680 --> 0:24:27.200
<v Speaker 1>a symptom something they're complaining about. So if somebody is

0:24:27.240 --> 0:24:29.600
<v Speaker 1>saying that they're a big procrastinator and they don't have

0:24:29.600 --> 0:24:32.879
<v Speaker 1>any control over this is who they are. The doctor

0:24:33.040 --> 0:24:36.800
<v Speaker 1>prescribes them one hour of procrastination every day. So I

0:24:36.880 --> 0:24:39.240
<v Speaker 1>decide an hour to just procrastinate. And it does a

0:24:39.280 --> 0:24:41.680
<v Speaker 1>bunch of different things. One, it's silly. The whole point

0:24:41.720 --> 0:24:44.520
<v Speaker 1>of it is meant to be silly. It also takes

0:24:44.560 --> 0:24:48.320
<v Speaker 1>something that was formerly thought of as involuntary voluntary, and

0:24:48.320 --> 0:24:51.480
<v Speaker 1>since it's voluntary, you can also voluntarily not do it.

0:24:51.480 --> 0:24:53.600
<v Speaker 1>It means you can actually control something you didn't think

0:24:53.640 --> 0:24:56.040
<v Speaker 1>you could control. Right. But and then also by making

0:24:56.080 --> 0:24:59.040
<v Speaker 1>it silly, it disempowers this thing that's like just such

0:24:59.080 --> 0:25:01.680
<v Speaker 1>a big problem. It's now it's a silly thing. I'm

0:25:01.760 --> 0:25:05.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm purposefully procrastinating an hour out of every day. The

0:25:05.720 --> 0:25:08.240
<v Speaker 1>thing is is if the patient is not privy to

0:25:08.400 --> 0:25:13.320
<v Speaker 1>what technique you're using, it's very manipulative. Yeah. It's almost

0:25:13.359 --> 0:25:17.200
<v Speaker 1>like a lighthearted aversion therapy kind of you sort of

0:25:17.480 --> 0:25:20.600
<v Speaker 1>exposure exposure. Yeah, is that the same thing? Yeah, not

0:25:20.680 --> 0:25:23.240
<v Speaker 1>a version, but yeah, it's it's yeah, like, if you're

0:25:23.240 --> 0:25:25.000
<v Speaker 1>afraid of snakes, let me dump a bunch of snakes

0:25:25.000 --> 0:25:31.160
<v Speaker 1>on your head. Yeah that's pretty unethical, I would say, so. Um,

0:25:31.200 --> 0:25:33.399
<v Speaker 1>but like you said, some psychologists say, no, you can

0:25:33.480 --> 0:25:36.720
<v Speaker 1>use it as a tool in your toolbox, just don't

0:25:36.760 --> 0:25:41.200
<v Speaker 1>be a tool when you use it. Terrible. So. Um.

0:25:41.359 --> 0:25:44.239
<v Speaker 1>The whole point of all of this is these are

0:25:44.240 --> 0:25:48.560
<v Speaker 1>all persuasive techniques, or what are called compliance techniques, right, Yeah,

0:25:48.560 --> 0:25:50.239
<v Speaker 1>that's what you're trying to get people to do what

0:25:50.320 --> 0:25:53.040
<v Speaker 1>you want. And there's another thing I ran across called

0:25:53.040 --> 0:25:55.520
<v Speaker 1>the door in the face. It's a compliance technique which

0:25:55.600 --> 0:25:59.520
<v Speaker 1>people use all the time. You'll find it very familiar. Um.

0:25:59.560 --> 0:26:02.119
<v Speaker 1>It's when you ask for something really huge that you

0:26:02.160 --> 0:26:04.600
<v Speaker 1>know the other person is going to turn down, and

0:26:04.720 --> 0:26:07.280
<v Speaker 1>they do. And then you ask for something what you

0:26:07.359 --> 0:26:11.399
<v Speaker 1>originally wanted, which is smaller by comparison. They may have

0:26:11.480 --> 0:26:14.080
<v Speaker 1>turned down if you'd ask for it just on itself. Yeah,

0:26:14.119 --> 0:26:15.960
<v Speaker 1>I think we talked about a version of that in

0:26:16.000 --> 0:26:20.000
<v Speaker 1>the m p A. A. Like filmmakers, they'll say, I

0:26:20.040 --> 0:26:23.200
<v Speaker 1>really want to get this violent scene in there, so

0:26:23.440 --> 0:26:26.359
<v Speaker 1>let me do something really outrageous that the m p

0:26:26.480 --> 0:26:28.159
<v Speaker 1>A is gonna pull that and not pay as much

0:26:28.200 --> 0:26:30.200
<v Speaker 1>attention to the thing I really wanted to keep right.

0:26:30.240 --> 0:26:32.119
<v Speaker 1>So that's door in the face. There's also footing the

0:26:32.200 --> 0:26:36.560
<v Speaker 1>door where um, you ask for incrementally larger stuff to

0:26:36.600 --> 0:26:39.040
<v Speaker 1>where you finally build up to the thing you want smaller,

0:26:39.600 --> 0:26:42.640
<v Speaker 1>smaller to larger, but then lastly check the other thing

0:26:42.640 --> 0:26:46.399
<v Speaker 1>I ran across. It was probably the healthiest way of

0:26:46.480 --> 0:26:50.800
<v Speaker 1>using reverse psychology. So if reverse psychology works because the

0:26:50.880 --> 0:26:54.600
<v Speaker 1>person feels like there's their sense of autonomy is being threatened,

0:26:55.160 --> 0:26:57.719
<v Speaker 1>you take their autonomy and you put it front and center.

0:26:58.160 --> 0:27:01.400
<v Speaker 1>You say, I can't make you do anything. Only you

0:27:01.440 --> 0:27:03.600
<v Speaker 1>can decide whether this is good or bad for you,

0:27:04.640 --> 0:27:09.040
<v Speaker 1>So do what you want. And technically it's a form

0:27:09.080 --> 0:27:11.119
<v Speaker 1>of verse psychology. But what you're doing is you're taking

0:27:11.119 --> 0:27:13.199
<v Speaker 1>this obstacle that really doesn't have anything to do with

0:27:13.240 --> 0:27:16.320
<v Speaker 1>anything this person's sense of autonomy putting it right there

0:27:16.359 --> 0:27:19.159
<v Speaker 1>in the middle and saying this is a non issue, like,

0:27:19.320 --> 0:27:22.040
<v Speaker 1>I respect your autonomy. I can't tell you what to do.

0:27:22.080 --> 0:27:26.320
<v Speaker 1>You decided it's it doesn't even strike me as manipulative necessarily,

0:27:26.320 --> 0:27:28.639
<v Speaker 1>it strikes me as healthy. Yeah, Or you can just

0:27:28.720 --> 0:27:31.679
<v Speaker 1>be honest with people. See where that gets you. But

0:27:31.720 --> 0:27:34.399
<v Speaker 1>I think that's honesty. True. But yeah, you can also

0:27:34.520 --> 0:27:37.040
<v Speaker 1>just say like I want you to do this. You

0:27:37.080 --> 0:27:38.960
<v Speaker 1>know I can't make you, but this is the direction

0:27:39.000 --> 0:27:41.359
<v Speaker 1>I want you to go. There's also the door in

0:27:41.359 --> 0:27:48.359
<v Speaker 1>the floor. No, do you mean flowers in the attic? No?

0:27:48.560 --> 0:27:53.520
<v Speaker 1>During the floor was the the Jeff Bridges movie based

0:27:53.600 --> 0:27:57.560
<v Speaker 1>on the John Irving book, A Widow for One Year.

0:27:58.920 --> 0:28:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Great book, pretty good movie. John Irving knows what he's doing.

0:28:02.400 --> 0:28:04.160
<v Speaker 1>I thought A Widow for One Year is a much

0:28:04.200 --> 0:28:06.359
<v Speaker 1>better title than the Door in the Floor. Though you

0:28:06.520 --> 0:28:08.840
<v Speaker 1>have a door in the floor. Rhymes. Hollywood loves rhymes,

0:28:09.040 --> 0:28:12.920
<v Speaker 1>they sure do. Yeah. Yeah, Uh, you got anything else? U?

0:28:13.080 --> 0:28:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Surprisingly No. If you want to know more about reverse psychology,

0:28:16.920 --> 0:28:20.680
<v Speaker 1>good luck finding it because we covered everything sadly. Uh.

0:28:20.760 --> 0:28:23.520
<v Speaker 1>You can start though, looking at how stuff works in

0:28:23.560 --> 0:28:27.320
<v Speaker 1>the search bar by typing reverse psychology. Since I said

0:28:27.320 --> 0:28:31.919
<v Speaker 1>search bar, it's time for listening to mail. This is

0:28:31.920 --> 0:28:34.320
<v Speaker 1>from Robbie. Hey, guys, thanks for your enlightening coverage of

0:28:35.119 --> 0:28:37.320
<v Speaker 1>vast assortment of topics. Help me find common ground with

0:28:37.359 --> 0:28:41.080
<v Speaker 1>children and adults and all types of social situations that

0:28:41.120 --> 0:28:44.960
<v Speaker 1>could have otherwise have been excruciating the awkward. Um. I'm

0:28:44.960 --> 0:28:46.560
<v Speaker 1>an artist, so I listened to you while I paint.

0:28:46.720 --> 0:28:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Music is great, but sometimes spoken word allows me to

0:28:49.400 --> 0:28:52.320
<v Speaker 1>work longer. It's a steady feed of stimulation instead of

0:28:52.320 --> 0:28:55.120
<v Speaker 1>emotional ups and downs. It can come for music and

0:28:55.200 --> 0:28:58.840
<v Speaker 1>other music related news. I recently conducted a social science

0:28:58.840 --> 0:29:02.880
<v Speaker 1>experiment where around New York City and ask strangers what

0:29:03.840 --> 0:29:07.440
<v Speaker 1>there are three favorite things are? The most common answers

0:29:07.480 --> 0:29:13.400
<v Speaker 1>were family, music, and food? What would yours be? What? So?

0:29:13.440 --> 0:29:23.320
<v Speaker 1>What three? What are your three favorite things? Okay? Um? Yeah? Um?

0:29:23.440 --> 0:29:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Can I can I lump food into just one category? Food? Okay?

0:29:29.160 --> 0:29:37.440
<v Speaker 1>UM's gonna do you do? What's your guest travel? Yeah?

0:29:37.480 --> 0:29:41.080
<v Speaker 1>I guess okay or booze? No. No, I'm not so

0:29:41.120 --> 0:29:43.200
<v Speaker 1>sad that I'm going to say that, although it's definitely

0:29:43.280 --> 0:29:46.720
<v Speaker 1>up there, I will say. I will say my lemon

0:29:46.720 --> 0:29:50.000
<v Speaker 1>tree is probably number three. I love that lemon tree.

0:29:50.560 --> 0:29:55.240
<v Speaker 1>It's a producer. Uh, not like that lousy lime tree.

0:29:55.600 --> 0:29:58.560
<v Speaker 1>And my friends. I gotta put them there. We'll we'll

0:29:58.560 --> 0:30:03.920
<v Speaker 1>say food and friend okay, after doing me my favorite

0:30:03.920 --> 0:30:11.520
<v Speaker 1>maturee things. My favorite three things are food. I'm gonna

0:30:11.520 --> 0:30:15.440
<v Speaker 1>say friends and family, which includes Emily. It's a bit

0:30:15.440 --> 0:30:22.920
<v Speaker 1>of a cheap um food. Friends and family, folks food,

0:30:22.960 --> 0:30:26.440
<v Speaker 1>folks and fun fun. Friends and families are chiefs that

0:30:26.480 --> 0:30:32.959
<v Speaker 1>includes everybody. Yeah, you can just say folks, food as family,

0:30:33.240 --> 0:30:38.880
<v Speaker 1>people and People's number two for you. I'm gonna go

0:30:38.880 --> 0:30:41.840
<v Speaker 1>with music. Oh, that's a good one. Boom. What about

0:30:41.920 --> 0:30:46.920
<v Speaker 1>movies though? Do you like music more than movies? I like? Oh, man,

0:30:46.960 --> 0:30:49.520
<v Speaker 1>that is a tough, tough, tough question. You know who

0:30:49.560 --> 0:30:53.880
<v Speaker 1>asks people questions like this, jerks no, because it's so

0:30:53.920 --> 0:30:56.800
<v Speaker 1>impossible to just come up with three things. What's this

0:30:56.880 --> 0:31:02.360
<v Speaker 1>guy's name, Robbie, Robbie, You're not really a jerk, but man, Actually,

0:31:02.400 --> 0:31:03.960
<v Speaker 1>what the email should have said is if I are

0:31:04.000 --> 0:31:06.120
<v Speaker 1>you guys, I don't know. I don't think you could

0:31:06.160 --> 0:31:09.280
<v Speaker 1>answer it. He should have said, like psychology, I want

0:31:09.280 --> 0:31:11.280
<v Speaker 1>to hear you, guys waffle on your top five or

0:31:11.320 --> 0:31:13.280
<v Speaker 1>six things that you like the most in the world.

0:31:13.720 --> 0:31:16.520
<v Speaker 1>So He finishes by saying, what would yours be? There

0:31:16.520 --> 0:31:18.480
<v Speaker 1>are three of you. I'm sorry, but there's only two

0:31:18.480 --> 0:31:21.520
<v Speaker 1>of us are here now, umrank the chairs over there,

0:31:21.520 --> 0:31:23.840
<v Speaker 1>but he can't. Could you possibly answer the question we

0:31:24.000 --> 0:31:27.800
<v Speaker 1>just did? I would record the podcast app on my

0:31:27.840 --> 0:31:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Apple TV as you spoke and then include this footage

0:31:31.880 --> 0:31:36.880
<v Speaker 1>in his experiment. So, uh, we're being experimented on right now. Yeah,

0:31:36.920 --> 0:31:38.920
<v Speaker 1>let's let's ahead give hi permission to use that clip

0:31:38.960 --> 0:31:41.560
<v Speaker 1>if he wants. I do not give you promise you

0:31:41.560 --> 0:31:46.160
<v Speaker 1>can use my my side, you can use it. That's

0:31:46.160 --> 0:31:49.160
<v Speaker 1>a thank you for your incredible work with your three

0:31:49.200 --> 0:31:51.479
<v Speaker 1>exclamation points. Is there a site that people can go

0:31:51.520 --> 0:31:54.560
<v Speaker 1>to to check out Robbie's progress or keep starter or anything? Well,

0:31:54.600 --> 0:31:57.080
<v Speaker 1>he he directed us to a YouTube link. So if

0:31:57.080 --> 0:31:59.320
<v Speaker 1>I just go to YouTube and type in three favorite

0:31:59.320 --> 0:32:02.320
<v Speaker 1>things and um, you'll probably come across it. Cool. Well,

0:32:02.360 --> 0:32:06.680
<v Speaker 1>thanks a lot, Robbie. Uh I mean that ambivalently. Um,

0:32:06.720 --> 0:32:08.280
<v Speaker 1>it's like six months ago the yeah, so so you

0:32:08.320 --> 0:32:11.400
<v Speaker 1>probably gave up on us anyway. Is there even a

0:32:11.480 --> 0:32:14.880
<v Speaker 1>YouTube anymore? Um? If you want to get in touch

0:32:14.880 --> 0:32:16.880
<v Speaker 1>with us that you can tweet to us at s

0:32:17.000 --> 0:32:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Y s K podcast. You can join us on Facebook,

0:32:19.320 --> 0:32:22.000
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash stuff you Should Know. You can send

0:32:22.040 --> 0:32:24.240
<v Speaker 1>us an email to Stuff podcast that how Stuff Works

0:32:24.240 --> 0:32:25.960
<v Speaker 1>dot com and has always joined us at at home

0:32:25.960 --> 0:32:33.320
<v Speaker 1>on the web. Stuff you Should Know dot com For

0:32:33.480 --> 0:32:35.760
<v Speaker 1>more on this and thousands of other topics. Is it

0:32:35.840 --> 0:32:44.200
<v Speaker 1>how stuff Works dot com