WEBVTT - How Oaktree's Head of Sourcing Finds the Next Great Deal

0:00:03.080 --> 0:00:21.439
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, Radio News. Hello and welcome to

0:00:21.480 --> 0:00:25.120
<v Speaker 1>another episode of the All Thoughts Podcast. I'm Tracy Alloway.

0:00:24.840 --> 0:00:25.360
<v Speaker 2>And I'm Joe.

0:00:25.560 --> 0:00:26.600
<v Speaker 3>Wasn't that Joe?

0:00:26.680 --> 0:00:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Do you remember deal toys? Did you ever see those?

0:00:29.880 --> 0:00:32.680
<v Speaker 2>I never got a deal I never I do know

0:00:32.680 --> 0:00:33.040
<v Speaker 2>what they were.

0:00:33.040 --> 0:00:35.360
<v Speaker 1>You wouldn't get a deal toy unless you were working.

0:00:35.120 --> 0:00:38.720
<v Speaker 2>Out, so I'm aware that they existed, but I don't

0:00:39.280 --> 0:00:40.599
<v Speaker 2>never had one. I never saw one.

0:00:40.760 --> 0:00:42.519
<v Speaker 1>I used to be slightly obsessed with them.

0:00:42.640 --> 0:00:45.200
<v Speaker 2>Were they toys like or were they like like were

0:00:45.200 --> 0:00:47.240
<v Speaker 2>they those sort of looseight Uh?

0:00:47.720 --> 0:00:51.919
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's pretty much it. So if you are working

0:00:52.200 --> 0:00:55.520
<v Speaker 1>in capital markets or in mergers and acquisitions and you

0:00:55.600 --> 0:00:57.800
<v Speaker 1>completed a deal, you would mark the end of that

0:00:57.840 --> 0:01:01.880
<v Speaker 1>transaction by, you know, adding some sort of swag I guess.

0:01:01.920 --> 0:01:03.640
<v Speaker 1>And it could be really boring. It could just be

0:01:03.680 --> 0:01:06.200
<v Speaker 1>a looseight block or something like that. But some of

0:01:06.240 --> 0:01:09.440
<v Speaker 1>them were really interesting and fun. And one of the

0:01:09.440 --> 0:01:12.440
<v Speaker 1>ones I remember seeing was someone it must have been

0:01:12.480 --> 0:01:16.400
<v Speaker 1>working in like capital markets. It was a little toggle,

0:01:16.880 --> 0:01:18.960
<v Speaker 1>like an actual like think of like a railroad I

0:01:19.200 --> 0:01:22.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of toggle, and it was to celebrate the first

0:01:22.800 --> 0:01:25.160
<v Speaker 1>ever pick toggle transaction.

0:01:25.480 --> 0:01:27.440
<v Speaker 2>So can I say something you know we talked to

0:01:27.640 --> 0:01:30.360
<v Speaker 2>First of all, it's amazing. Second of all, you know,

0:01:30.680 --> 0:01:34.280
<v Speaker 2>we talked to a lot of investors on the podcast.

0:01:34.560 --> 0:01:37.200
<v Speaker 2>We talked to a lot of people whose job in

0:01:37.280 --> 0:01:40.160
<v Speaker 2>some way resembles our job, which is looking at screens

0:01:40.560 --> 0:01:44.080
<v Speaker 2>all day or maybe looking at data. I think if

0:01:44.120 --> 0:01:46.920
<v Speaker 2>I ever had gone into finance, I would have some

0:01:47.160 --> 0:01:49.760
<v Speaker 2>job that looked involved a lot of looking at screens

0:01:49.760 --> 0:01:51.880
<v Speaker 2>and a lot of maybe looking at data, but mostly

0:01:51.920 --> 0:01:55.480
<v Speaker 2>just looking at screens. We don't often talk talk to

0:01:55.600 --> 0:01:57.680
<v Speaker 2>a lot of people who are in the world of

0:01:57.720 --> 0:02:01.160
<v Speaker 2>actually talking to other people about making things happen. I

0:02:01.280 --> 0:02:02.840
<v Speaker 2>never think i'd be good at that. No one wants

0:02:02.840 --> 0:02:04.400
<v Speaker 2>to hang out with me, you know, stuff like that.

0:02:04.520 --> 0:02:06.640
<v Speaker 2>And so I want to learn and talk to more

0:02:06.680 --> 0:02:10.320
<v Speaker 2>people about how actually things in finance, whether we're talking

0:02:10.320 --> 0:02:12.320
<v Speaker 2>about a deal, whether we're talking about a new issuance,

0:02:12.400 --> 0:02:16.280
<v Speaker 2>et cetera, how that actually happens, how an instrument or

0:02:16.320 --> 0:02:18.520
<v Speaker 2>security actually comes into the world.

0:02:18.720 --> 0:02:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Well, I'm very pleased to say, Joe that we do,

0:02:21.040 --> 0:02:23.320
<v Speaker 1>in fact have the perfect guest for this topic. We're

0:02:23.360 --> 0:02:25.560
<v Speaker 1>going to be speaking to someone who's day to day

0:02:25.560 --> 0:02:30.080
<v Speaker 1>business is talking to people sourcing and finding deal and

0:02:30.120 --> 0:02:34.760
<v Speaker 1>someone who also knows exactly about that Pictoggle deal toy

0:02:34.960 --> 0:02:37.400
<v Speaker 1>that I mentioned earlier. So I'm very excited we're going

0:02:37.480 --> 0:02:39.360
<v Speaker 1>to be talking. We're going to try to thread the

0:02:39.400 --> 0:02:43.200
<v Speaker 1>needle between sourcing deals and also something else we've been

0:02:43.240 --> 0:02:45.839
<v Speaker 1>interested in lately, which is private. That's right, all right,

0:02:45.880 --> 0:02:49.240
<v Speaker 1>So without further ado, we're speaking with Millwood Hobbes. He

0:02:49.440 --> 0:02:54.000
<v Speaker 1>leads Oak Trees Sourcing, an originations group. So really again

0:02:54.160 --> 0:02:57.280
<v Speaker 1>the perfect person, Millwood, thank you so much for coming

0:02:57.320 --> 0:02:59.480
<v Speaker 1>on all thoughts, Thank you for having me. So I'm

0:02:59.560 --> 0:03:03.280
<v Speaker 1>right right about the pictogle toy. You've seen this toy.

0:03:03.440 --> 0:03:06.720
<v Speaker 3>Yes, I've seen it. My favorite deal toys. There's two

0:03:06.760 --> 0:03:10.200
<v Speaker 3>that stick out when Ford spun out Hurts in two

0:03:10.240 --> 0:03:13.400
<v Speaker 3>thousand and five, I was part of that transaction, and

0:03:13.480 --> 0:03:16.959
<v Speaker 3>so I have a set of car keys and there's

0:03:18.360 --> 0:03:21.600
<v Speaker 3>from Hurts and it's it's a it's they're called loose Heights. Yeah.

0:03:21.680 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 3>And then the other one, which was pretty cool. I

0:03:23.360 --> 0:03:25.600
<v Speaker 3>did the Mars regularly deal with Byron Trott, and so

0:03:25.639 --> 0:03:29.480
<v Speaker 3>I have two eminem amazing guys that sort of they

0:03:29.600 --> 0:03:30.079
<v Speaker 3>lay out.

0:03:29.919 --> 0:03:31.920
<v Speaker 2>The train a room in your house that's sort of

0:03:31.919 --> 0:03:34.560
<v Speaker 2>like I'm imagining high school athletes trophies.

0:03:35.880 --> 0:03:39.200
<v Speaker 3>So so you know, I have we moved there in

0:03:39.280 --> 0:03:41.920
<v Speaker 3>Covid in twenty twenty and we bought a house and

0:03:42.040 --> 0:03:45.040
<v Speaker 3>I have like a real library. And then that library

0:03:45.120 --> 0:03:47.840
<v Speaker 3>are two things from investment banking that I have. I

0:03:47.920 --> 0:03:50.840
<v Speaker 3>have bank books from deals we used to we used

0:03:50.840 --> 0:03:53.080
<v Speaker 3>to go to a printer and we used to draft.

0:03:53.240 --> 0:03:56.160
<v Speaker 3>Oh like the pitch that well, it's like a it's

0:03:56.200 --> 0:04:00.520
<v Speaker 3>like an actual it's a glossy picture book of of

0:04:00.560 --> 0:04:03.240
<v Speaker 3>the deal. The transaction goes through transaction over youw, it

0:04:03.240 --> 0:04:06.680
<v Speaker 3>goes through company, it goes through business, and that was

0:04:06.760 --> 0:04:10.760
<v Speaker 3>what folks used to actually underwrite deals back in early

0:04:10.840 --> 0:04:13.600
<v Speaker 3>two thousands. Yeah, and then I have loose sites, so

0:04:13.640 --> 0:04:14.800
<v Speaker 3>I have a lot of loose sights.

0:04:15.040 --> 0:04:18.320
<v Speaker 1>So the unit that you're leading at oak Tree that

0:04:18.440 --> 0:04:22.280
<v Speaker 1>was created I think relatively recently, it was like twenty

0:04:22.680 --> 0:04:23.880
<v Speaker 1>What was the thinking behind that?

0:04:24.200 --> 0:04:29.080
<v Speaker 3>So the market private credit in origination and financing of

0:04:29.120 --> 0:04:31.080
<v Speaker 3>deals has evolved quite a bit. If you just go

0:04:31.200 --> 0:04:34.240
<v Speaker 3>back to kind of pre Dot Frank, most private equity

0:04:34.279 --> 0:04:38.040
<v Speaker 3>firms didn't have what we call capital markets professionals, and

0:04:38.440 --> 0:04:42.080
<v Speaker 3>post Dot Frank and the migration and creation of a

0:04:42.160 --> 0:04:45.280
<v Speaker 3>robust private credit mark. Most of the private equity firms

0:04:45.400 --> 0:04:50.680
<v Speaker 3>have capital markets professionals who really spend time drafting, creating,

0:04:50.839 --> 0:04:54.919
<v Speaker 3>structuring financings for the private equity buyouts. And what we

0:04:55.000 --> 0:04:57.680
<v Speaker 3>figured out oak Tree we were founded in nineteen ninety five,

0:04:57.720 --> 0:05:00.520
<v Speaker 3>we managed a couple hundred billion dollars. What we were

0:05:00.520 --> 0:05:03.920
<v Speaker 3>figuring out when I first started in twenty thirteen. Every

0:05:03.960 --> 0:05:06.480
<v Speaker 3>strategy within oak Tree kind of did its own thing.

0:05:06.960 --> 0:05:09.200
<v Speaker 3>So if a deal came into one strategy and it

0:05:09.240 --> 0:05:12.000
<v Speaker 3>didn't work, it just kind of died in that strategy.

0:05:12.040 --> 0:05:15.120
<v Speaker 3>So what we decided as the market evolved and moved

0:05:15.160 --> 0:05:19.599
<v Speaker 3>towards capital solution provider versus this fund does this and

0:05:19.640 --> 0:05:22.880
<v Speaker 3>this fund does that. We created my group with the

0:05:22.920 --> 0:05:24.719
<v Speaker 3>real purpose of a couple of things. Number one is

0:05:24.800 --> 0:05:29.760
<v Speaker 3>making sure we were focused on providing capital solutions versus

0:05:30.080 --> 0:05:33.279
<v Speaker 3>trying to figure out what fit a particular strategy. Yeah,

0:05:33.400 --> 0:05:35.479
<v Speaker 3>and then the second reason we really did it is that,

0:05:36.000 --> 0:05:38.480
<v Speaker 3>you know, capital is the commodity in our business. Everyone

0:05:38.520 --> 0:05:40.760
<v Speaker 3>has a lot of money, but how do you get

0:05:40.760 --> 0:05:43.600
<v Speaker 3>the first call in the last call? And that's the relationship.

0:05:43.960 --> 0:05:46.680
<v Speaker 3>So my team is meant to really spend time and

0:05:46.720 --> 0:05:50.480
<v Speaker 3>develop relationships with the counting parties because look, the reality

0:05:50.480 --> 0:05:53.919
<v Speaker 3>of it is, we shouldn't. We're not agreeing on We

0:05:54.000 --> 0:05:56.800
<v Speaker 3>have different investors, So a private equity firm has a

0:05:56.839 --> 0:06:00.599
<v Speaker 3>different investor base than we have. The goal in my

0:06:00.720 --> 0:06:03.680
<v Speaker 3>group is to one make sure the entire firm sees

0:06:03.720 --> 0:06:06.880
<v Speaker 3>a transaction, and two we're involved in the art of

0:06:06.880 --> 0:06:09.920
<v Speaker 3>the deal, right, And so the goal is no one

0:06:09.960 --> 0:06:12.960
<v Speaker 3>really should win. Both parties should be just mildly annoyed.

0:06:13.480 --> 0:06:15.800
<v Speaker 3>And how do you do that? How do you do that?

0:06:15.880 --> 0:06:17.479
<v Speaker 3>In a way you do it the relationship.

0:06:17.600 --> 0:06:20.400
<v Speaker 1>That's funny because we say that in journalism sometimes, like

0:06:20.640 --> 0:06:24.000
<v Speaker 1>the goal is for everyone to be like slightly dissatisfied

0:06:24.000 --> 0:06:27.440
<v Speaker 1>in the story, because if everyone's happy, then you basically

0:06:27.480 --> 0:06:28.440
<v Speaker 1>put out a press.

0:06:28.160 --> 0:06:31.760
<v Speaker 3>Release somebody's wrong. If one side is really happy, the

0:06:31.800 --> 0:06:32.840
<v Speaker 3>other side is probably wrong.

0:06:33.200 --> 0:06:35.720
<v Speaker 2>I know Tracy already more or less ask this question,

0:06:35.800 --> 0:06:37.800
<v Speaker 2>but I'll just put it in a different way. What

0:06:37.880 --> 0:06:39.760
<v Speaker 2>do you just give us a sort of brief overview.

0:06:39.760 --> 0:06:41.320
<v Speaker 2>If someone says, what do you do and how'd you

0:06:41.360 --> 0:06:43.200
<v Speaker 2>get here? What did you do and how you get here?

0:06:43.520 --> 0:06:45.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so you don't want you don't want my full

0:06:46.040 --> 0:06:47.440
<v Speaker 3>full background.

0:06:47.000 --> 0:06:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I actually do, because you've been in the market

0:06:49.360 --> 0:06:50.000
<v Speaker 1>for a really.

0:06:49.760 --> 0:06:50.360
<v Speaker 4>Long time.

0:06:52.200 --> 0:06:52.719
<v Speaker 2>Childhood.

0:06:52.720 --> 0:06:55.240
<v Speaker 3>But okay, okay, I'll start from what I'll start from.

0:06:55.360 --> 0:06:58.200
<v Speaker 3>So so look, my my dad was in public accounting,

0:06:58.320 --> 0:07:00.200
<v Speaker 3>and originally so I got a fool. I could a

0:07:00.200 --> 0:07:02.920
<v Speaker 3>scholarship to Rutgers to go to law school. I sat

0:07:02.960 --> 0:07:06.160
<v Speaker 3>in political science and I would fall asleep and wake

0:07:06.240 --> 0:07:08.159
<v Speaker 3>up and they were talking about the same thing. So

0:07:08.200 --> 0:07:09.680
<v Speaker 3>I said, I don't think I can do four years

0:07:09.680 --> 0:07:13.000
<v Speaker 3>of political science. So I switched to accounting. Because my generation,

0:07:13.720 --> 0:07:16.720
<v Speaker 3>you did what the adult said to do. And so

0:07:16.840 --> 0:07:19.920
<v Speaker 3>I switched to public into accounting, and my dad said,

0:07:20.200 --> 0:07:24.000
<v Speaker 3>don't do public accounting, do banking. So I started out

0:07:24.040 --> 0:07:27.040
<v Speaker 3>at a firm called Nation's Bank, which is now is

0:07:27.040 --> 0:07:30.720
<v Speaker 3>a predecessor to Bank of America. And the most interesting

0:07:30.840 --> 0:07:33.680
<v Speaker 3>job I had at Nations Banking, I was a controller

0:07:33.720 --> 0:07:36.360
<v Speaker 3>for leverage finance. I was de controlling, the youngest controller

0:07:36.840 --> 0:07:39.360
<v Speaker 3>in the firm, and I said, I want to be

0:07:39.360 --> 0:07:41.440
<v Speaker 3>a leverage finance banker, you know. And the reason why

0:07:41.520 --> 0:07:44.520
<v Speaker 3>it sounds silly when you're at my age, but they

0:07:45.080 --> 0:07:48.080
<v Speaker 3>wore a nice time, They were nice shoes, They were

0:07:48.080 --> 0:07:50.080
<v Speaker 3>in big in finance, and at that time Nation's Bank

0:07:50.200 --> 0:07:54.160
<v Speaker 3>was a pretty big terminobe lender, and so the head

0:07:54.160 --> 0:07:56.840
<v Speaker 3>of the group basically said, look, right now, you're just

0:07:56.880 --> 0:07:59.480
<v Speaker 3>an accountant. He said, go get a sales job and

0:07:59.520 --> 0:08:01.640
<v Speaker 3>then go to the school. So again I went to

0:08:01.720 --> 0:08:08.040
<v Speaker 3>g Capitol and I financed commercial equipment, so rolling stock assets, cars, trucks, forklifts.

0:08:08.520 --> 0:08:10.240
<v Speaker 3>Did that for one year to today, and then went

0:08:10.240 --> 0:08:13.320
<v Speaker 3>to Columbia Business School. I summered at first Boston and

0:08:13.360 --> 0:08:16.400
<v Speaker 3>I summered in asset backs and leverage finance, and then

0:08:16.480 --> 0:08:20.239
<v Speaker 3>doing deoutsche Bank in two thousand full time. And during

0:08:20.240 --> 0:08:25.679
<v Speaker 3>that time period I structured a lot of lbo's sun Guard, Nema,

0:08:25.760 --> 0:08:26.960
<v Speaker 3>Marcus Us foods.

0:08:26.680 --> 0:08:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Irridium, first Demon, Marcus being the first ever pick Togles. Yes,

0:08:30.840 --> 0:08:32.480
<v Speaker 1>and so you had that deal toy.

0:08:32.720 --> 0:08:34.760
<v Speaker 3>I have it, you know, I'll be honest with you.

0:08:34.840 --> 0:08:37.160
<v Speaker 3>I think I gave it to someone more senior. Oh.

0:08:36.960 --> 0:08:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Oh, should have given it to me.

0:08:38.720 --> 0:08:41.680
<v Speaker 3>I know somebody who has one. And then in two

0:08:41.679 --> 0:08:45.040
<v Speaker 3>thousand and seven I left Deutsche Bank. And really you

0:08:45.080 --> 0:08:46.920
<v Speaker 3>sort of say, why would you leave Deutsche Bank? And

0:08:46.960 --> 0:08:49.160
<v Speaker 3>if you go back to two thousand and seven, the

0:08:49.200 --> 0:08:54.640
<v Speaker 3>market was very concentrated so versus today. There were eight

0:08:54.720 --> 0:08:58.080
<v Speaker 3>underwriters who owned all the leverage finance, right, so you

0:08:58.080 --> 0:09:02.000
<v Speaker 3>could see the market. You know, when I got a

0:09:02.000 --> 0:09:04.840
<v Speaker 3>call to say, hey, what leverage would you provide on

0:09:04.840 --> 0:09:08.000
<v Speaker 3>a deal? I'd ask the private equity firm, well, what

0:09:08.000 --> 0:09:09.800
<v Speaker 3>do you think the business work, and they'd say, well,

0:09:09.800 --> 0:09:12.400
<v Speaker 3>it's based on you know, leverage, and so you could

0:09:12.440 --> 0:09:14.800
<v Speaker 3>see that coming to a head. So in two thousand

0:09:14.800 --> 0:09:16.920
<v Speaker 3>and seven I went to Goldman Sachs. I did LBOs

0:09:16.920 --> 0:09:19.280
<v Speaker 3>at Goldman Sachs and also did high you sales and

0:09:19.360 --> 0:09:20.920
<v Speaker 3>joined oak Tree in twenty thirteen.

0:09:21.000 --> 0:09:23.280
<v Speaker 2>It's always interesting to hear someone's background, but I like

0:09:23.320 --> 0:09:26.960
<v Speaker 2>how there's dovetails with the actual development of the industry

0:09:27.000 --> 0:09:28.880
<v Speaker 2>itself and this idea that at one point there were

0:09:28.960 --> 0:09:31.440
<v Speaker 2>just a handful of very small or a handful of

0:09:31.480 --> 0:09:34.080
<v Speaker 2>banks that ran leverage finance, and then of course we

0:09:34.160 --> 0:09:36.920
<v Speaker 2>know about the proliferation of all that. So it's pretty useful.

0:09:37.000 --> 0:09:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, with that background, well, why don't we dive into

0:09:39.200 --> 0:09:41.160
<v Speaker 1>that a little bit more so, talk to us about

0:09:41.160 --> 0:09:45.040
<v Speaker 1>how the credit market, the capital market has evolved over

0:09:45.080 --> 0:09:46.040
<v Speaker 1>the course of your career.

0:09:46.400 --> 0:09:51.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so, look, when I first started, covenants were pretty

0:09:51.200 --> 0:09:56.240
<v Speaker 3>standard amendments to deals were actually fairly standard, and as

0:09:56.280 --> 0:09:59.240
<v Speaker 3>you moved forward, by two thousand and seven, the majority

0:09:59.320 --> 0:10:02.959
<v Speaker 3>market was cove light. The one interesting thing about pre

0:10:03.160 --> 0:10:06.760
<v Speaker 3>Dodd Frank was in the credit agreement, which is a

0:10:06.840 --> 0:10:09.360
<v Speaker 3>document that sort of governs the loan if you will,

0:10:09.880 --> 0:10:12.640
<v Speaker 3>you had to hedge fifty percent of your floating rate risk.

0:10:13.200 --> 0:10:16.959
<v Speaker 3>And so going into the cycle, two things that made

0:10:17.040 --> 0:10:20.560
<v Speaker 3>since then is one folks were hedged fifty percent, and

0:10:20.600 --> 0:10:23.959
<v Speaker 3>then the other thing is lightboar if you remember back

0:10:24.000 --> 0:10:26.400
<v Speaker 3>in two thousand and seven was at five percent, so

0:10:26.440 --> 0:10:29.320
<v Speaker 3>the spread to deals was two hundred and fifty to

0:10:29.360 --> 0:10:33.199
<v Speaker 3>get to that seven and a half percent average LBO. Well,

0:10:33.360 --> 0:10:36.319
<v Speaker 3>what happened at when Dodd Frank, when the markets cried

0:10:36.320 --> 0:10:40.680
<v Speaker 3>the world the global financial crisis, rates went to zero, right,

0:10:40.720 --> 0:10:45.400
<v Speaker 3>So companies actually generated cash flow in that cycle. The

0:10:45.520 --> 0:10:48.120
<v Speaker 3>challenge or difference we have today is we've been in

0:10:48.200 --> 0:10:52.560
<v Speaker 3>no rate environment, so no one really hedged one and

0:10:52.600 --> 0:10:57.240
<v Speaker 3>then two there because there was zero percent base rates,

0:10:57.280 --> 0:10:59.840
<v Speaker 3>the spread on deals was much higher. Instead of two

0:11:00.120 --> 0:11:03.280
<v Speaker 3>or fifty, you had for fifty five hundred, six hundred.

0:11:03.640 --> 0:11:07.080
<v Speaker 3>So when twenty two when rates started to move up,

0:11:08.040 --> 0:11:10.880
<v Speaker 3>you actually had a situation where a lot of companies

0:11:10.920 --> 0:11:15.040
<v Speaker 3>couldn't support the cash flows because no one predicted that

0:11:15.160 --> 0:11:18.600
<v Speaker 3>race will movement, and most folks were not hedged like

0:11:18.640 --> 0:11:20.200
<v Speaker 3>they were in two thousand and seven.

0:11:35.880 --> 0:11:37.840
<v Speaker 2>Can you talk a little bit, you know, it's a

0:11:37.880 --> 0:11:40.600
<v Speaker 2>theme that obviously comes up with every private credit but

0:11:40.679 --> 0:11:44.400
<v Speaker 2>also other episodes as well. Talk to us a little

0:11:44.400 --> 0:11:48.920
<v Speaker 2>bit more about like the post the immediate the passage

0:11:48.920 --> 0:11:52.280
<v Speaker 2>of Dodd Frank and how it's set into people's brands,

0:11:52.520 --> 0:11:55.360
<v Speaker 2>that this is going to restructure the financial industry, that

0:11:55.360 --> 0:11:57.760
<v Speaker 2>there are to be various activities, whether we're talking about trading,

0:11:57.800 --> 0:11:59.800
<v Speaker 2>whether we're talking about lending, et cetera. Right, these are

0:11:59.840 --> 0:12:03.120
<v Speaker 2>not to be part of the banks anymore. Right, talk

0:12:03.160 --> 0:12:05.120
<v Speaker 2>to us a little bit about those sort of early

0:12:05.480 --> 0:12:07.079
<v Speaker 2>posting you know, and they were talking to two thousand

0:12:07.080 --> 0:12:10.800
<v Speaker 2>and nine, twenty ten, those initial conversations that people were

0:12:10.840 --> 0:12:13.920
<v Speaker 2>having about something new, New opportunities are going to emerge

0:12:13.960 --> 0:12:14.280
<v Speaker 2>from them.

0:12:14.520 --> 0:12:17.160
<v Speaker 3>Right. Well, well, if you go back to two thousand

0:12:17.160 --> 0:12:21.680
<v Speaker 3>and seven, when a portfolio manager and a public side

0:12:22.120 --> 0:12:26.080
<v Speaker 3>was selling risk in the market, the banks were the

0:12:26.120 --> 0:12:29.320
<v Speaker 3>shock absorber to that risk. Yeah, right, So you know

0:12:29.320 --> 0:12:32.079
<v Speaker 3>when I was sitting at Goldman Sachs, it wasn't unusual

0:12:32.160 --> 0:12:35.160
<v Speaker 3>for us to buy two hundred million dollars of an

0:12:35.160 --> 0:12:36.840
<v Speaker 3>issue and it would be on your balanchie and it'd

0:12:36.840 --> 0:12:39.880
<v Speaker 3>be on our balance sheet. Right post what Dodd Frank

0:12:40.080 --> 0:12:42.960
<v Speaker 3>did effectively has said, okay, if you go back to

0:12:43.000 --> 0:12:45.559
<v Speaker 3>the leverage. And I hope I'm not being too technical, but.

0:12:45.600 --> 0:12:46.200
<v Speaker 2>No, there's great.

0:12:46.200 --> 0:12:50.200
<v Speaker 3>Banks were levered roughly thirty times pre global financial crisis.

0:12:50.840 --> 0:12:54.760
<v Speaker 3>Post they're fifteen times levered. Right, So once you shrunk

0:12:54.880 --> 0:12:57.640
<v Speaker 3>that liquidity or capital out of the banks, they can

0:12:57.720 --> 0:13:02.160
<v Speaker 3>no longer absorb the deals. And so what happens is

0:13:02.240 --> 0:13:05.800
<v Speaker 3>and this is why liquidity is really an important phenomenon.

0:13:06.440 --> 0:13:09.920
<v Speaker 3>So when a PM calls the desk and says, hey,

0:13:09.960 --> 0:13:13.480
<v Speaker 3>I have to move five, ten, fifteen million, you're not

0:13:13.520 --> 0:13:15.680
<v Speaker 3>really sure what their real size is because they know

0:13:15.760 --> 0:13:18.280
<v Speaker 3>the market's not liquid. When I was in sales and trading,

0:13:18.760 --> 0:13:21.640
<v Speaker 3>Pimco or somebody would call and say, hey, I've got

0:13:22.000 --> 0:13:24.000
<v Speaker 3>several million to move, and I'd say, well, this is

0:13:24.000 --> 0:13:26.040
<v Speaker 3>your first call or a last call, and they laugh

0:13:26.080 --> 0:13:27.520
<v Speaker 3>and they say why, I said, because I give you

0:13:27.520 --> 0:13:30.400
<v Speaker 3>two different prices. And so what happens in a market

0:13:30.480 --> 0:13:34.960
<v Speaker 3>that's less liquid is as they're trying to sell, they

0:13:35.000 --> 0:13:38.800
<v Speaker 3>call relative different banks, and every time they make a call,

0:13:38.920 --> 0:13:42.040
<v Speaker 3>a bank then assumes that there's more behind that to go,

0:13:42.640 --> 0:13:45.360
<v Speaker 3>and so they rerack the pricing. And so in a

0:13:45.400 --> 0:13:49.319
<v Speaker 3>public security, which is different than private, a public security

0:13:49.360 --> 0:13:54.560
<v Speaker 3>can actually move pricing wise without anything really trading, but

0:13:54.679 --> 0:13:58.880
<v Speaker 3>on the anticipation that there's their supply out there, and

0:13:58.960 --> 0:14:02.200
<v Speaker 3>so that created you know, and if you go back

0:14:02.240 --> 0:14:04.679
<v Speaker 3>to two thousand and nine, private credit market was like

0:14:04.720 --> 0:14:07.880
<v Speaker 3>three hundred billion dollars, right, most of that was more

0:14:07.960 --> 0:14:11.320
<v Speaker 3>mes or off the run, not what we call our

0:14:11.360 --> 0:14:14.520
<v Speaker 3>regular way direct lending private credit, which we were active in,

0:14:15.000 --> 0:14:17.400
<v Speaker 3>but we're doing it more on the distress or opportunistic

0:14:17.440 --> 0:14:22.000
<v Speaker 3>credit side, and over time, because of the liquidity and

0:14:22.080 --> 0:14:26.320
<v Speaker 3>capital requirements of banks, more of that has just migrated

0:14:26.680 --> 0:14:30.280
<v Speaker 3>to the private credit market, supplemented by the fact that

0:14:30.320 --> 0:14:34.200
<v Speaker 3>there are these private equity professionals who are very efficient

0:14:34.440 --> 0:14:38.080
<v Speaker 3>at looking at both markets and figuring out where they

0:14:38.080 --> 0:14:40.320
<v Speaker 3>should play or where they should place their credit or

0:14:40.320 --> 0:14:40.840
<v Speaker 3>their deals.

0:14:41.160 --> 0:14:43.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm getting a lot of flashbacks to writing about corporate

0:14:43.600 --> 0:14:48.120
<v Speaker 1>bond inventories that the dealers like around twenty twelve, so

0:14:48.360 --> 0:14:51.320
<v Speaker 1>just on this note, is the pitch from private credit?

0:14:51.400 --> 0:14:54.680
<v Speaker 1>Is it basically execution? Like you don't need to worry

0:14:54.960 --> 0:14:58.920
<v Speaker 1>about us actually being able to do or complete this deal.

0:14:58.960 --> 0:15:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Where is it a bank? You know they're taking into

0:15:01.880 --> 0:15:06.280
<v Speaker 1>into account leverage considerations, regulatory requirements and all that, right.

0:15:06.560 --> 0:15:10.040
<v Speaker 3>Right, So what a proper deal should be? Right? If

0:15:10.120 --> 0:15:14.160
<v Speaker 3>you're sitting in private equity, your job is to find

0:15:14.200 --> 0:15:18.400
<v Speaker 3>the most efficient, best price capital for your deal. Right.

0:15:19.040 --> 0:15:21.880
<v Speaker 3>The public market, what they're very good at doing is saying,

0:15:22.040 --> 0:15:24.800
<v Speaker 3>here is the indicative rate for a deal. And let's

0:15:24.840 --> 0:15:28.280
<v Speaker 3>just say the indicative on a term loan is sofur

0:15:28.360 --> 0:15:32.280
<v Speaker 3>plus four hundred. Right, then the private equity firm comes

0:15:32.280 --> 0:15:35.680
<v Speaker 3>to us and says, where will you actually own that risk? Right?

0:15:36.000 --> 0:15:38.240
<v Speaker 3>So they get a level where we're owning, which won't

0:15:38.280 --> 0:15:41.680
<v Speaker 3>be the indicative because remember the banks are marketing, Hey,

0:15:41.720 --> 0:15:44.000
<v Speaker 3>we can get you the best rate and best execution.

0:15:44.720 --> 0:15:47.200
<v Speaker 3>We're in the storage business. The banks are in the

0:15:47.240 --> 0:15:49.640
<v Speaker 3>moving business, so they're trying to move the risk, and

0:15:49.680 --> 0:15:51.680
<v Speaker 3>we own the risk, and so we price the risk

0:15:51.720 --> 0:15:55.400
<v Speaker 3>where we'll hold it. And if those two are not aligned,

0:15:57.240 --> 0:15:58.840
<v Speaker 3>what then? And then once you add to that four

0:15:58.920 --> 0:16:01.640
<v Speaker 3>hundred is you ad what we call flex. So if

0:16:01.640 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 3>you take the indicative plus flex, that gives you an

0:16:05.000 --> 0:16:07.280
<v Speaker 3>idea of what the banks are willing to say that

0:16:07.360 --> 0:16:09.920
<v Speaker 3>this debt will price. So let's say the flex is

0:16:09.920 --> 0:16:12.840
<v Speaker 3>one hundred and fifty basis points, so they know on

0:16:12.880 --> 0:16:15.560
<v Speaker 3>the private equity side, they know worst case the banks

0:16:15.560 --> 0:16:18.520
<v Speaker 3>will own it at SOFA five point fifty, which the

0:16:18.560 --> 0:16:21.200
<v Speaker 3>banks have gotten that sort of flex number based on

0:16:21.320 --> 0:16:24.480
<v Speaker 3>their discussions with us to know where we would actually

0:16:24.480 --> 0:16:25.120
<v Speaker 3>own that risk.

0:16:25.480 --> 0:16:25.880
<v Speaker 1>I see.

0:16:26.080 --> 0:16:28.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So the process is how do you create an

0:16:28.400 --> 0:16:32.160
<v Speaker 3>efficient auction to have the debt in the right market

0:16:32.240 --> 0:16:34.120
<v Speaker 3>at the right pricing with the right structure.

0:16:35.280 --> 0:16:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so here's my other question. When you are about

0:16:38.760 --> 0:16:40.760
<v Speaker 1>to do a deal, or when you find a deal,

0:16:41.280 --> 0:16:44.000
<v Speaker 1>who are you actually talking to? Is it the banks

0:16:44.240 --> 0:16:46.440
<v Speaker 1>or is it like the companies that are borrowing in

0:16:46.480 --> 0:16:47.160
<v Speaker 1>the market.

0:16:47.400 --> 0:16:49.640
<v Speaker 3>So so generally in a.

0:16:51.160 --> 0:16:55.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, oh wow, so sorry answer questions, but I'm just

0:16:55.160 --> 0:16:57.520
<v Speaker 2>sort of like I'm talking question.

0:16:57.840 --> 0:17:01.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm talking to both, right, everyone was my friend. And

0:17:01.600 --> 0:17:05.000
<v Speaker 3>the goal is the more conversations I have, the more

0:17:05.000 --> 0:17:08.359
<v Speaker 3>informed I am of where the market is right. You know,

0:17:08.400 --> 0:17:12.320
<v Speaker 3>the interesting thing about public markets is that market reprices

0:17:12.440 --> 0:17:16.160
<v Speaker 3>risk faster than private credit because there's a secondary market.

0:17:16.440 --> 0:17:19.399
<v Speaker 3>Private credit doesn't really have a secondary market. So what

0:17:19.520 --> 0:17:22.560
<v Speaker 3>we're always trying to make sure we're understanding is relative

0:17:22.600 --> 0:17:26.040
<v Speaker 3>value between public and private. And so my conversation, let's

0:17:26.040 --> 0:17:30.320
<v Speaker 3>say XYZ sponsor wants to buy a business, right and

0:17:30.400 --> 0:17:32.800
<v Speaker 3>let's say it's a public company. The first call, I'll

0:17:32.840 --> 0:17:35.399
<v Speaker 3>get his front that sponsor and say, hey, Millwood, we

0:17:35.640 --> 0:17:38.320
<v Speaker 3>like you guys to look at a financing opportunity for

0:17:38.440 --> 0:17:42.440
<v Speaker 3>public company we're looking to buy. I'm like great, I say, look,

0:17:42.480 --> 0:17:44.520
<v Speaker 3>I'll put my compliance on the email and we'll do

0:17:44.560 --> 0:17:47.159
<v Speaker 3>a conflicts checks on that business because we don't know

0:17:47.160 --> 0:17:49.960
<v Speaker 3>if we own the stock or there's existing debt outstanding.

0:17:50.040 --> 0:17:53.119
<v Speaker 3>So it goes through a process where that company is

0:17:53.160 --> 0:17:56.639
<v Speaker 3>actually vetted from a conflicts perspective. Once it's vetted and

0:17:56.680 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 3>that clears the process, then we get initial information on it.

0:18:00.000 --> 0:18:05.560
<v Speaker 3>And that information could be a selling memoranda, it could

0:18:05.640 --> 0:18:09.480
<v Speaker 3>be an initial model, and so then we start the process.

0:18:09.520 --> 0:18:11.600
<v Speaker 3>And what the sponsor wants to be able to do

0:18:11.840 --> 0:18:15.000
<v Speaker 3>is from the preliminary information is get a sense for

0:18:15.160 --> 0:18:16.840
<v Speaker 3>do you want do you like the asset or not?

0:18:17.520 --> 0:18:19.520
<v Speaker 3>Do you want to finance it, where do you want

0:18:19.520 --> 0:18:22.119
<v Speaker 3>to finance it at, and what's your leverage and what

0:18:22.160 --> 0:18:25.520
<v Speaker 3>you're pricing. So there's some high level indication that they

0:18:25.560 --> 0:18:28.159
<v Speaker 3>get from us to determine if they if we should

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:31.240
<v Speaker 3>move forward with a more robust diligence process. So that's

0:18:31.720 --> 0:18:34.800
<v Speaker 3>that's how it starts. And then at that point we

0:18:34.840 --> 0:18:37.880
<v Speaker 3>do a due diligence process on the asset. Right, so

0:18:37.920 --> 0:18:41.159
<v Speaker 3>we may have we may call third party consultants, we

0:18:41.240 --> 0:18:44.040
<v Speaker 3>may do some background on it. We have a call

0:18:44.119 --> 0:18:47.880
<v Speaker 3>with a sponsor, we understand their investment thesis, like why

0:18:47.920 --> 0:18:51.159
<v Speaker 3>are they making the investment, and then we talk internally

0:18:51.359 --> 0:18:53.359
<v Speaker 3>and we have an investment committee and we discuss it,

0:18:53.960 --> 0:18:56.960
<v Speaker 3>and then we'll iterate with the sponsor on diligence questions.

0:18:57.680 --> 0:18:59.840
<v Speaker 3>And then at that point it becomes are you in

0:18:59.880 --> 0:19:03.360
<v Speaker 3>a you out? And so then once the sponsor kind

0:19:03.359 --> 0:19:05.240
<v Speaker 3>of has a sense for who's in and who's out,

0:19:06.040 --> 0:19:09.159
<v Speaker 3>now their goal is to get the right terms, and

0:19:09.240 --> 0:19:12.840
<v Speaker 3>so there's a process around sending us their thoughts on

0:19:12.880 --> 0:19:15.840
<v Speaker 3>the terms right and our job is to figure out

0:19:15.920 --> 0:19:18.840
<v Speaker 3>which of those we want to negotiate and which are

0:19:18.840 --> 0:19:19.399
<v Speaker 3>we fine with.

0:19:19.560 --> 0:19:22.760
<v Speaker 2>First of all, this fantastic stuff. I want to talk

0:19:22.880 --> 0:19:26.840
<v Speaker 2>more about, you know what, or get to what it takes,

0:19:26.920 --> 0:19:28.800
<v Speaker 2>what it takes to be the first call, because you

0:19:28.840 --> 0:19:31.600
<v Speaker 2>said that's that's important, and I'm like curious, Like, you know,

0:19:31.720 --> 0:19:33.840
<v Speaker 2>Tracy and I are competitors, how does one of us

0:19:33.840 --> 0:19:36.000
<v Speaker 2>get the first call out? But but even before we get

0:19:36.000 --> 0:19:41.040
<v Speaker 2>into that question, and it occurs to me that you know,

0:19:41.119 --> 0:19:43.560
<v Speaker 2>because you work for oak Tree and there are multiple

0:19:43.640 --> 0:19:46.600
<v Speaker 2>strategies within it, and you work ass with like different

0:19:46.800 --> 0:19:50.719
<v Speaker 2>people on different committees and different funds, et cetera, is

0:19:50.760 --> 0:19:55.959
<v Speaker 2>there ever tension that arises between your recognition of the

0:19:56.040 --> 0:20:00.159
<v Speaker 2>need to make the get that first call versus what

0:20:00.240 --> 0:20:03.520
<v Speaker 2>people on investment committees see as the fair price right.

0:20:03.560 --> 0:20:07.080
<v Speaker 2>Because if the investor is always trying to get every

0:20:07.119 --> 0:20:09.040
<v Speaker 2>penny fun right, then at some point I'm going to

0:20:09.080 --> 0:20:13.080
<v Speaker 2>stop calling talk to us about reconciling that. And I

0:20:13.119 --> 0:20:15.000
<v Speaker 2>also have to imagine, just to sort of add on

0:20:15.040 --> 0:20:17.480
<v Speaker 2>a part read to this question. You know, it would

0:20:17.520 --> 0:20:19.960
<v Speaker 2>be one thing if like it was a small shop

0:20:19.960 --> 0:20:23.240
<v Speaker 2>and one strategy, but you're looking at this holistically correct,

0:20:23.240 --> 0:20:26.240
<v Speaker 2>Where's the investor who's running a specific line there, cares

0:20:26.240 --> 0:20:28.159
<v Speaker 2>about their returns and doesn't care so much about the

0:20:28.200 --> 0:20:31.239
<v Speaker 2>returns of the other fund or just the general So

0:20:31.280 --> 0:20:33.400
<v Speaker 2>talk to us about reconciling some of these tensions.

0:20:33.480 --> 0:20:37.000
<v Speaker 3>Right. So the biggest tension is, like I said earlier,

0:20:37.640 --> 0:20:42.840
<v Speaker 3>we don't necessarily agree on price, structure, leverage. Right. But

0:20:43.040 --> 0:20:46.800
<v Speaker 3>what we're doing is I'm talking to that sponsor or

0:20:46.880 --> 0:20:51.160
<v Speaker 3>that client or that company all the time. Hey, how's

0:20:51.200 --> 0:20:53.399
<v Speaker 3>your family? I know where they get is go to school.

0:20:53.520 --> 0:20:55.080
<v Speaker 3>I may do zooms with their kids.

0:20:56.240 --> 0:20:58.200
<v Speaker 2>Hey, Milwolle really is a part of my big.

0:20:59.680 --> 0:21:01.480
<v Speaker 3>He say, no, I want to I want to go

0:21:01.520 --> 0:21:03.479
<v Speaker 3>to Ocean Prime. I know you know the manager. I'm

0:21:03.480 --> 0:21:08.480
<v Speaker 3>bringing a family. So yeah, so we are full service here.

0:21:08.520 --> 0:21:11.760
<v Speaker 3>And again, like I said, the relationship is getting the

0:21:11.760 --> 0:21:13.160
<v Speaker 3>first call and the last call. And by the way,

0:21:13.200 --> 0:21:15.640
<v Speaker 3>out of twenty deals, I only care about the last two.

0:21:15.720 --> 0:21:18.399
<v Speaker 3>So how do I pass eighteen times so I can

0:21:18.440 --> 0:21:22.000
<v Speaker 3>see the last two? So it really is a form

0:21:22.040 --> 0:21:24.480
<v Speaker 3>of art, if you will. And what we're trying to

0:21:24.520 --> 0:21:29.719
<v Speaker 3>do is demystify the negotiation and we're institutionalizing relationships. So

0:21:30.320 --> 0:21:34.080
<v Speaker 3>if XYZ sponsors in LA, they'll call me and say, hey, mil,

0:21:34.080 --> 0:21:35.480
<v Speaker 3>what who should I talk to the Okay, let me

0:21:35.480 --> 0:21:38.200
<v Speaker 3>give you a list of folks. Because the more that

0:21:38.200 --> 0:21:42.000
<v Speaker 3>that private equity firm or that sponsor or whatever client

0:21:42.160 --> 0:21:46.800
<v Speaker 3>is feels like they understand our firm, the better the relationship.

0:21:47.480 --> 0:21:50.760
<v Speaker 3>So we spend time making sure that they know who

0:21:50.880 --> 0:21:53.919
<v Speaker 3>our CEO Army is or Bob o'lary, that they know

0:21:54.000 --> 0:21:56.679
<v Speaker 3>the pms at the different strategies, so it's not a

0:21:56.720 --> 0:21:59.080
<v Speaker 3>scary monster. You know, when I when I joined in

0:21:59.080 --> 0:22:02.720
<v Speaker 3>originally oak Tree, remember we were more opportunistic and as

0:22:02.760 --> 0:22:05.120
<v Speaker 3>the market has evolved, and as we have evolved as

0:22:05.160 --> 0:22:09.159
<v Speaker 3>a firm, we're sort of private credit and opportunists. And

0:22:09.160 --> 0:22:11.680
<v Speaker 3>by the way, the client will say, no, I don't

0:22:11.720 --> 0:22:14.800
<v Speaker 3>really care about one side of the house versus the other.

0:22:14.840 --> 0:22:17.280
<v Speaker 3>Your oak Tree, right, So we have to sort of

0:22:17.320 --> 0:22:20.040
<v Speaker 3>in your oak Tree. I'm oak Tree, right, And so

0:22:20.280 --> 0:22:22.920
<v Speaker 3>I have to go to the market as one as

0:22:22.960 --> 0:22:24.119
<v Speaker 3>one firm.

0:22:24.640 --> 0:22:26.479
<v Speaker 1>Wait, talk to us a little bit more about what

0:22:26.640 --> 0:22:30.879
<v Speaker 1>negotiations are actually like, because I will say, we just

0:22:30.880 --> 0:22:34.879
<v Speaker 1>had Suji endap On wrote a great book about the

0:22:34.920 --> 0:22:41.439
<v Speaker 1>Caesar's Palace LBO. Yeah, you're in that, not you specifically,

0:22:41.440 --> 0:22:44.399
<v Speaker 1>but oak Tree certainly is. And there's certainly like there

0:22:44.400 --> 0:22:47.280
<v Speaker 1>are some very dramatic negotiations that take place in sure.

0:22:47.320 --> 0:22:49.840
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, I mean look, sometimes you just you get up,

0:22:49.920 --> 0:22:51.320
<v Speaker 3>you throw your pencil in air, and you walk out

0:22:51.320 --> 0:22:53.600
<v Speaker 3>of room. And sometimes you know, so you know, at

0:22:53.640 --> 0:22:56.359
<v Speaker 3>the art of negotiation is what I say to what

0:22:56.440 --> 0:22:59.960
<v Speaker 3>I say to my team is it's not the negotiating

0:23:00.040 --> 0:23:03.520
<v Speaker 3>point you're discussing at the moment, it's the points that

0:23:03.560 --> 0:23:07.440
<v Speaker 3>are coming two points later. Right, You're always thinking ahead

0:23:07.960 --> 0:23:11.280
<v Speaker 3>on the negotiation. You know, we did a deal for

0:23:11.400 --> 0:23:15.119
<v Speaker 3>a business that wasn't really loved in the leverage finance market.

0:23:15.800 --> 0:23:18.000
<v Speaker 3>And I knew that the type of business because I

0:23:18.000 --> 0:23:21.359
<v Speaker 3>had done an LBO and the market really didn't understand it.

0:23:21.359 --> 0:23:24.480
<v Speaker 3>But it was a great management team. Sometimes sometimes deals

0:23:24.520 --> 0:23:26.359
<v Speaker 3>do well because the management team is very good and

0:23:26.440 --> 0:23:29.040
<v Speaker 3>very articulate. And I knew this deal would struggle at

0:23:29.040 --> 0:23:32.439
<v Speaker 3>a bank, and so when it was hung, which means

0:23:32.480 --> 0:23:33.919
<v Speaker 3>the bank had the funded.

0:23:33.680 --> 0:23:34.520
<v Speaker 1>They got stuck with it.

0:23:34.560 --> 0:23:38.440
<v Speaker 3>They got stuck with it. I called in and I said, hey, sorry,

0:23:39.680 --> 0:23:43.520
<v Speaker 3>but I'll buy fifty million at ninety okay, right, Oh gosh,

0:23:43.720 --> 0:23:46.159
<v Speaker 3>what ninety Wow, that's that's a deep discount. Da da

0:23:46.200 --> 0:23:48.560
<v Speaker 3>da da dah. I said, well, you know, I think

0:23:48.560 --> 0:23:51.280
<v Speaker 3>as you now realize that business is not it's a

0:23:51.359 --> 0:23:54.000
<v Speaker 3>little tricky business. And it was a public tool private.

0:23:54.359 --> 0:23:56.920
<v Speaker 3>So a private equity firm was taking a public company

0:23:57.520 --> 0:23:59.840
<v Speaker 3>and making it private. And even though it was a

0:24:00.160 --> 0:24:03.400
<v Speaker 3>climing margin business, there was a view that the public

0:24:03.440 --> 0:24:08.040
<v Speaker 3>company expenses were high. So you could sort of map

0:24:08.480 --> 0:24:11.320
<v Speaker 3>you can map a scenario where over twelve months they

0:24:11.320 --> 0:24:13.679
<v Speaker 3>were going to cut some of the public company calls

0:24:13.720 --> 0:24:18.000
<v Speaker 3>and create a more efficient which would create more ebadah yep. Right,

0:24:18.480 --> 0:24:20.800
<v Speaker 3>So they sold it to us. So now I'm a

0:24:20.840 --> 0:24:23.919
<v Speaker 3>top five lender right with the right responsor. You had

0:24:23.960 --> 0:24:28.040
<v Speaker 3>the right relationship right, well, sponsor, which you know they're

0:24:28.080 --> 0:24:32.160
<v Speaker 3>they're meant to be opportunistic too. Cap structure ibadadh gru

0:24:32.440 --> 0:24:37.160
<v Speaker 3>cap structure looked good. So they wanted to do a dividend. Now, again,

0:24:37.280 --> 0:24:40.680
<v Speaker 3>in a negotiation, if you're doing a dividend, that means

0:24:40.680 --> 0:24:42.400
<v Speaker 3>you're putting more debt on my capital structure.

0:24:42.680 --> 0:24:44.080
<v Speaker 2>Right, that's money that could go to you.

0:24:44.119 --> 0:24:46.240
<v Speaker 3>That's money that could go to anybody with them, right.

0:24:46.520 --> 0:24:49.400
<v Speaker 3>And so you know the job of a sponsor at

0:24:49.400 --> 0:24:52.600
<v Speaker 3>that moment is to call the top five lenders and say, hey,

0:24:52.640 --> 0:24:54.360
<v Speaker 3>I'm doing a dividend deal, and they take me from

0:24:54.440 --> 0:24:58.760
<v Speaker 3>violently upset to miley annoyed. That's the job. So this

0:24:58.840 --> 0:25:02.520
<v Speaker 3>sponsor did not call it on that dividend deal, and

0:25:02.600 --> 0:25:05.000
<v Speaker 3>so now I have a I'm in a unique situation.

0:25:05.560 --> 0:25:08.040
<v Speaker 3>They went to other lenders and got the fifty one

0:25:08.119 --> 0:25:10.520
<v Speaker 3>percent to do the deal, and I felt some kind

0:25:10.520 --> 0:25:14.720
<v Speaker 3>of way about that, some kind of way, and so

0:25:15.040 --> 0:25:18.320
<v Speaker 3>I proceeded to try to figure out why folks would

0:25:18.320 --> 0:25:20.800
<v Speaker 3>agree to this dividend deal. And so I called the

0:25:20.840 --> 0:25:25.080
<v Speaker 3>market and a sponsor sort of said, you know, he

0:25:25.160 --> 0:25:27.680
<v Speaker 3>calls me and he says, no, what I hear? You're

0:25:27.680 --> 0:25:30.240
<v Speaker 3>working against me on my dividend deal. I said, well,

0:25:30.680 --> 0:25:32.800
<v Speaker 3>that's not actually true, because you didn't call me when

0:25:32.800 --> 0:25:34.920
<v Speaker 3>you launched it. So he said, but I thought we

0:25:34.960 --> 0:25:36.800
<v Speaker 3>had a good relationship. I said, we do. I thought

0:25:36.840 --> 0:25:39.840
<v Speaker 3>so too, but you didn't call me, all right, And so,

0:25:40.240 --> 0:25:44.679
<v Speaker 3>long story short, the dividend didn't go through, right, and

0:25:44.760 --> 0:25:47.439
<v Speaker 3>so then we changed the structure of the dividend to

0:25:47.560 --> 0:25:49.879
<v Speaker 3>allow we shrunk the size of the dividend, We changed

0:25:49.880 --> 0:25:54.560
<v Speaker 3>the original issue discount, and I told the sponsor, I said, look, unfortunately,

0:25:54.600 --> 0:25:58.159
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to sell the position when this closes. And

0:25:58.600 --> 0:26:02.160
<v Speaker 3>the point of that story is sometimes it's life's too

0:26:02.200 --> 0:26:05.439
<v Speaker 3>short and not all, not all relationships are meant to

0:26:05.480 --> 0:26:09.480
<v Speaker 3>go on forever. We still talk, I'm still a good friend,

0:26:09.520 --> 0:26:11.639
<v Speaker 3>he's still a good friend, but we haven't done a

0:26:11.640 --> 0:26:15.480
<v Speaker 3>lot together since then, because sometimes you know, in our

0:26:15.520 --> 0:26:18.280
<v Speaker 3>in our in a negotiation, if you don't see IDI

0:26:19.200 --> 0:26:21.399
<v Speaker 3>and that deal worked out, what happens if it doesn't

0:26:21.440 --> 0:26:25.959
<v Speaker 3>work out? Yeah, right, So sometimes sometimes you're managing relationships

0:26:26.320 --> 0:26:29.959
<v Speaker 3>to keep, and sometimes you're managing relationships to not do

0:26:30.080 --> 0:26:32.040
<v Speaker 3>on a business side, but you always want to be

0:26:32.119 --> 0:26:34.920
<v Speaker 3>friendly in this market because you're usually one person away

0:26:34.920 --> 0:26:37.040
<v Speaker 3>from somebody that matters in business.

0:26:37.640 --> 0:26:40.120
<v Speaker 2>Actually, since we're on this point, that strikes me as

0:26:40.200 --> 0:26:43.480
<v Speaker 2>very savvy and very wise and like probably a lesson

0:26:43.520 --> 0:26:46.720
<v Speaker 2>many of us should learn in many realms that sometimes

0:26:46.720 --> 0:26:49.560
<v Speaker 2>it's okay to uh take the l or let a

0:26:49.920 --> 0:26:53.240
<v Speaker 2>proposal fall apart because life is long and other things

0:26:53.240 --> 0:26:56.960
<v Speaker 2>happen at some point. We have listeners who are in

0:26:57.040 --> 0:27:00.360
<v Speaker 2>college or young and they think about, you know, career trajectories,

0:27:00.400 --> 0:27:03.919
<v Speaker 2>et cetera. I'm curious, just from your perspective, this is

0:27:03.960 --> 0:27:06.280
<v Speaker 2>probably a sort of attitude that you would hope the

0:27:06.320 --> 0:27:10.200
<v Speaker 2>people who work for you cultivate, internalize, so to speak.

0:27:10.320 --> 0:27:13.440
<v Speaker 2>How do you recognize who has that? And like, when

0:27:13.440 --> 0:27:16.800
<v Speaker 2>you think about like people that you want on your team,

0:27:17.160 --> 0:27:20.280
<v Speaker 2>are you able to sort of like build intuitions about Yeah,

0:27:20.359 --> 0:27:22.760
<v Speaker 2>the people who can think that way.

0:27:23.080 --> 0:27:26.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So good, good question. So I would say, on

0:27:26.680 --> 0:27:30.920
<v Speaker 3>my team, everyone is uniquely different, and everyone's exceptional at

0:27:30.960 --> 0:27:33.680
<v Speaker 3>something and very good at everything else. And I think

0:27:33.720 --> 0:27:36.280
<v Speaker 3>where you make a mistake in building teams, especially in

0:27:36.560 --> 0:27:38.880
<v Speaker 3>our business, is you try to find someone who can

0:27:38.880 --> 0:27:41.200
<v Speaker 3>be exceptional at more than one thing. So I'll tell

0:27:41.200 --> 0:27:44.040
<v Speaker 3>you a good story. So when I was first starting out,

0:27:44.160 --> 0:27:46.840
<v Speaker 3>I would fly to Dallas, Texas, and I would meet

0:27:46.880 --> 0:27:49.439
<v Speaker 3>with folks in Texas, and I thought I was a

0:27:49.480 --> 0:27:53.600
<v Speaker 3>pretty charming, knowledgeable person on the markets, and everyone in

0:27:53.600 --> 0:27:57.280
<v Speaker 3>Texas was friendly. But what I figured out was by

0:27:57.320 --> 0:27:59.240
<v Speaker 3>the time the deals made it to me in New York,

0:28:00.040 --> 0:28:03.120
<v Speaker 3>in Texas, that already passed. So it's almost like wrong

0:28:03.160 --> 0:28:10.680
<v Speaker 3>way risk and so well, because you're in Texas, right,

0:28:10.680 --> 0:28:14.359
<v Speaker 3>it's a different culture, different in New York and and

0:28:14.359 --> 0:28:17.080
<v Speaker 3>and in some markets folks want to do business with

0:28:17.400 --> 0:28:19.520
<v Speaker 3>folks they may see on the weekend or see in

0:28:19.520 --> 0:28:22.560
<v Speaker 3>the gym or you know, and so it's it's more

0:28:22.600 --> 0:28:25.320
<v Speaker 3>of a that person sits in New York. They don't

0:28:25.359 --> 0:28:29.439
<v Speaker 3>really know me, right ye. So but if people in

0:28:29.480 --> 0:28:33.080
<v Speaker 3>Texas didn't really like the deal, then you call the

0:28:33.160 --> 0:28:37.720
<v Speaker 3>people in New York. So so I decided that I

0:28:37.760 --> 0:28:40.200
<v Speaker 3>needed to put someone in Texas. So how do you

0:28:40.280 --> 0:28:43.120
<v Speaker 3>hire people? Right? So this is for the year young audience.

0:28:43.400 --> 0:28:45.080
<v Speaker 3>So I went to a conference and he was kind

0:28:45.120 --> 0:28:47.239
<v Speaker 3>of managing a room really nicely. So I gave him

0:28:47.240 --> 0:28:48.760
<v Speaker 3>my business card. I said, hey, we'd love to spend

0:28:48.760 --> 0:28:51.760
<v Speaker 3>some time with you. So I called him and we

0:28:51.840 --> 0:28:54.760
<v Speaker 3>set up two days and meetings. Well, he didn't realize

0:28:54.800 --> 0:28:57.520
<v Speaker 3>I was actually interviewing him for two days. Because everyone

0:28:57.560 --> 0:29:00.880
<v Speaker 3>says they have great relationships, right, says, oh, yeah, I've

0:29:00.880 --> 0:29:03.240
<v Speaker 3>got the best relationship, Da da da da, But how

0:29:03.240 --> 0:29:05.760
<v Speaker 3>do you actually test that? So I spent two days

0:29:05.760 --> 0:29:08.760
<v Speaker 3>with this person, and look, you know, high school football

0:29:08.760 --> 0:29:11.040
<v Speaker 3>matters in Texas. I didn't play high school for I

0:29:11.080 --> 0:29:13.960
<v Speaker 3>played high school baseball. This person plays high school football.

0:29:14.320 --> 0:29:18.160
<v Speaker 3>And so you put someone in that territory that understands

0:29:18.200 --> 0:29:20.760
<v Speaker 3>the local culture. And what we're trying to do is

0:29:20.880 --> 0:29:24.360
<v Speaker 3>have a hub and spoke origination model where we where

0:29:24.360 --> 0:29:28.240
<v Speaker 3>we where. We have a global firm, but we try

0:29:28.280 --> 0:29:31.800
<v Speaker 3>to talk on a more regional, local level, and that's

0:29:31.800 --> 0:29:35.200
<v Speaker 3>what I think makes our sourcing origination a little bit different.

0:29:35.720 --> 0:29:39.560
<v Speaker 3>And again, people matter in this business, and again the

0:29:39.560 --> 0:29:41.200
<v Speaker 3>goal is to get the first call. On the last call,

0:29:41.560 --> 0:29:44.440
<v Speaker 3>that person may spend a lot of time, you know,

0:29:44.560 --> 0:29:49.520
<v Speaker 3>going to events, spending time with the families, and ultimately,

0:29:49.520 --> 0:29:51.920
<v Speaker 3>what you want folks to do is to show you

0:29:51.960 --> 0:29:52.720
<v Speaker 3>deals because they.

0:29:52.560 --> 0:30:07.360
<v Speaker 4>Trust you, and it's still a trust your business.

0:30:10.400 --> 0:30:12.600
<v Speaker 1>One thing I wanted to ask you, just going back

0:30:12.640 --> 0:30:15.360
<v Speaker 1>to something you said about the management of a particular

0:30:15.400 --> 0:30:19.920
<v Speaker 1>company being good in credit. We've spoken about this on

0:30:19.960 --> 0:30:22.160
<v Speaker 1>the podcast before, but we tend to think about it

0:30:22.240 --> 0:30:27.080
<v Speaker 1>as avoiding losers, right, whereas equities are more about finding

0:30:27.120 --> 0:30:32.000
<v Speaker 1>the winners. So I guess my question is, like, when

0:30:32.080 --> 0:30:34.960
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at a particular deal, do you feel that

0:30:34.960 --> 0:30:37.920
<v Speaker 1>you're making a bet on that business or is it

0:30:38.000 --> 0:30:40.640
<v Speaker 1>just about looking at the numbers and making sure that

0:30:40.720 --> 0:30:43.000
<v Speaker 1>you know you're not going to yes?

0:30:43.080 --> 0:30:47.280
<v Speaker 3>So so interesting enough, what we're trying to do in

0:30:47.320 --> 0:30:50.480
<v Speaker 3>a diligence process is figure out where there may be

0:30:50.560 --> 0:30:54.160
<v Speaker 3>holes in that investment. We did one deal with accounter

0:30:54.200 --> 0:30:58.600
<v Speaker 3>party that we required them to switch to CFO just

0:30:58.640 --> 0:31:01.680
<v Speaker 3>because the questions it took too long. The answer like

0:31:01.680 --> 0:31:03.840
<v Speaker 3>if I ask you how many days does it take

0:31:03.880 --> 0:31:06.200
<v Speaker 3>you to close your books? What percentage of that is

0:31:06.240 --> 0:31:09.480
<v Speaker 3>manual versus automated? What do your management letters say in

0:31:09.520 --> 0:31:12.560
<v Speaker 3>the auditor? You know, those types of questions if you

0:31:12.640 --> 0:31:14.720
<v Speaker 3>have to think about them, where you say, I'll come

0:31:14.760 --> 0:31:17.240
<v Speaker 3>back to you as a CFO, that would be concerning.

0:31:17.320 --> 0:31:20.560
<v Speaker 3>So you know, our job is to protect our investors. Yeah,

0:31:20.600 --> 0:31:24.120
<v Speaker 3>that's our job, and what we're trying to do is

0:31:24.280 --> 0:31:27.520
<v Speaker 3>make sure we understand the investment. And no one bats

0:31:27.520 --> 0:31:29.160
<v Speaker 3>a thousand, right. If you look at the top ten

0:31:29.200 --> 0:31:31.640
<v Speaker 3>hitters in Major League Baseball, they strike out as much

0:31:31.640 --> 0:31:34.440
<v Speaker 3>as they hit. So you know, our job is to

0:31:34.560 --> 0:31:37.760
<v Speaker 3>avoid losers, like you said, and we have to manage

0:31:37.800 --> 0:31:38.840
<v Speaker 3>that through a process.

0:31:39.600 --> 0:31:40.920
<v Speaker 2>Can you say actually a little more. I thought that

0:31:41.000 --> 0:31:43.400
<v Speaker 2>was really interesting about some of the questions that you

0:31:43.560 --> 0:31:46.120
<v Speaker 2>asked and the idea like why can't the CFO just

0:31:46.160 --> 0:31:47.720
<v Speaker 2>quickly answer how long it takes to you.

0:31:47.840 --> 0:31:49.680
<v Speaker 3>Would think that would be an easy Yeah.

0:31:49.480 --> 0:31:51.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm always surprised. Also, just generally there's a bit of

0:31:51.920 --> 0:31:54.080
<v Speaker 2>a tangent that even you know, in twenty twenty four

0:31:54.200 --> 0:31:57.640
<v Speaker 2>with like all the computer and accounting systems, that like

0:31:58.160 --> 0:32:00.360
<v Speaker 2>fraud still happens, that there are still way or you know,

0:32:00.400 --> 0:32:02.800
<v Speaker 2>companies like we have a material weakness and we're gonna

0:32:02.800 --> 0:32:06.280
<v Speaker 2>have to it. I'm always a little surprised that that curious,

0:32:06.400 --> 0:32:08.720
<v Speaker 2>like how you like this world of things just being

0:32:08.720 --> 0:32:11.160
<v Speaker 2>wrong or ambiguous at companies. And I'd love to hear

0:32:11.160 --> 0:32:12.160
<v Speaker 2>you talk more about that.

0:32:12.240 --> 0:32:15.320
<v Speaker 3>When you're when you buy a business as a platform

0:32:15.600 --> 0:32:19.440
<v Speaker 3>and then you then buy successive businesses, more than likely

0:32:19.520 --> 0:32:22.680
<v Speaker 3>they didn't have all the same financial stea and the

0:32:22.760 --> 0:32:25.640
<v Speaker 3>integration process depending on how quickly you want to grow,

0:32:25.680 --> 0:32:28.840
<v Speaker 3>it drives how long you actually integrate and so time

0:32:28.920 --> 0:32:31.840
<v Speaker 3>what time. What happens sometimes is you don't fully integrate

0:32:31.880 --> 0:32:35.880
<v Speaker 3>these businesses and systems. If you go back to failures

0:32:35.880 --> 0:32:40.000
<v Speaker 3>of businesses in our market SAP, integration is a big

0:32:40.160 --> 0:32:43.479
<v Speaker 3>sort of point of contention. And so businesses you focus

0:32:43.560 --> 0:32:47.040
<v Speaker 3>on risk that you see time and time. So fraud fraud,

0:32:47.120 --> 0:32:49.720
<v Speaker 3>you know, there was a water business that was you

0:32:49.760 --> 0:32:53.080
<v Speaker 3>know that was fraud fraudulent that you know, some banks

0:32:53.120 --> 0:32:54.960
<v Speaker 3>lost a lot of money. You know, if you go

0:32:55.040 --> 0:32:58.200
<v Speaker 3>back to like Collins and Aikman, which was an LBO

0:32:58.840 --> 0:33:01.600
<v Speaker 3>long time ago, there was some fraud and you could

0:33:01.640 --> 0:33:04.520
<v Speaker 3>see what you're doing in a diligence process. You are

0:33:04.560 --> 0:33:07.960
<v Speaker 3>looking for sort of what I call inherent weaknesses. And

0:33:08.000 --> 0:33:11.280
<v Speaker 3>the information you get back and management letters which the

0:33:11.320 --> 0:33:14.680
<v Speaker 3>auditors produced is a good document that sort of highlights

0:33:14.680 --> 0:33:18.960
<v Speaker 3>the risk of accounting systems, financial systems, and that's a

0:33:19.080 --> 0:33:22.240
<v Speaker 3>pretty systems tends to be a big driver of sort

0:33:22.280 --> 0:33:23.640
<v Speaker 3>of integration issues.

0:33:24.200 --> 0:33:27.640
<v Speaker 1>So this isn't necessarily fraud. But you just reminded me

0:33:27.960 --> 0:33:31.920
<v Speaker 1>of ad backs and deals and you know, adjusted earnings

0:33:31.960 --> 0:33:35.080
<v Speaker 1>and things that can be inflated to make a transaction

0:33:35.160 --> 0:33:38.200
<v Speaker 1>look a lot better than it actually is. The last

0:33:38.200 --> 0:33:41.160
<v Speaker 1>time I remember writing about this was I guess, gosh,

0:33:41.200 --> 0:33:44.160
<v Speaker 1>five or six years ago, and the feeling back then

0:33:44.360 --> 0:33:47.920
<v Speaker 1>was that there was more sketchy stuff happening on the

0:33:48.000 --> 0:33:51.720
<v Speaker 1>valuation side of credit deals. Is that still the case

0:33:51.840 --> 0:33:53.960
<v Speaker 1>or has that been your observation over the years.

0:33:54.240 --> 0:33:59.080
<v Speaker 3>Well, so, the ad backs, it's an assumption and it's

0:33:59.160 --> 0:34:01.400
<v Speaker 3>an ask to get credit for something that may happen

0:34:01.440 --> 0:34:05.720
<v Speaker 3>in the future, right, or it's saying something's happened previously

0:34:05.800 --> 0:34:09.279
<v Speaker 3>that hasn't fully been flown through the financial statements, and

0:34:09.320 --> 0:34:11.400
<v Speaker 3>we want to get credit or we don't want it

0:34:11.440 --> 0:34:15.279
<v Speaker 3>to affect our earnings. Every deal has adjustments, okay, so

0:34:15.840 --> 0:34:19.520
<v Speaker 3>just start with the premise that adjustedy badah will exist.

0:34:19.840 --> 0:34:22.120
<v Speaker 3>And part of our job is to trust our partners

0:34:22.120 --> 0:34:26.000
<v Speaker 3>that they're adjusting the right things. What happens is if

0:34:26.040 --> 0:34:30.000
<v Speaker 3>you watch the financial statements over time, sometimes the adjustments

0:34:30.000 --> 0:34:33.240
<v Speaker 3>never go away, right, and then you start to say, okay,

0:34:33.280 --> 0:34:36.239
<v Speaker 3>this is recurring, not RecA. Right. We did a deal

0:34:36.280 --> 0:34:39.000
<v Speaker 3>for a sponsor and we were and it was near

0:34:39.120 --> 0:34:43.160
<v Speaker 3>your end, and the sponsors going through each line item

0:34:43.280 --> 0:34:45.839
<v Speaker 3>of what they wanted to add back, and you know what,

0:34:45.960 --> 0:34:47.839
<v Speaker 3>I said, Wow, we could we could go through this

0:34:47.880 --> 0:34:50.279
<v Speaker 3>for three days, right, explaining one to add I say,

0:34:50.360 --> 0:34:53.319
<v Speaker 3>you know what, you can add back five million, call

0:34:53.320 --> 0:34:56.080
<v Speaker 3>it whatever you want. Right. So, at the end of

0:34:56.080 --> 0:35:00.200
<v Speaker 3>the day, what we're trying to do is understand the

0:35:00.320 --> 0:35:03.560
<v Speaker 3>rationale for the ad back in a market like today,

0:35:03.600 --> 0:35:07.680
<v Speaker 3>the problem is the rationale isn't fully explained all the time,

0:35:08.080 --> 0:35:09.520
<v Speaker 3>and the amount of time you want to add it

0:35:09.560 --> 0:35:13.960
<v Speaker 3>back it's kind of almost infinite. So you start to

0:35:13.960 --> 0:35:17.680
<v Speaker 3>say okay, and the sponsor's perspective would be I'm paying

0:35:17.760 --> 0:35:21.600
<v Speaker 3>for that right, because I'm paying off that Adjustinbadasa, you

0:35:21.640 --> 0:35:26.120
<v Speaker 3>should leverage against that. The counter would be I'm capped

0:35:26.160 --> 0:35:29.120
<v Speaker 3>upside right, I'm capped at par And if you go

0:35:29.200 --> 0:35:32.680
<v Speaker 3>back to seven, A lot of the ad backs in

0:35:32.680 --> 0:35:36.680
<v Speaker 3>some of the largelbos never truly came to fruition. So

0:35:37.000 --> 0:35:39.720
<v Speaker 3>if you take cap structures that will leverage seven times.

0:35:40.040 --> 0:35:42.840
<v Speaker 3>If you're adding back one hundred million a seven hundred

0:35:42.840 --> 0:35:45.520
<v Speaker 3>million more debt, that if one hundred million ever comes

0:35:45.520 --> 0:35:48.120
<v Speaker 3>through at some level, you could be over levered. So

0:35:48.160 --> 0:35:50.520
<v Speaker 3>that's why you have to look at ad backs. And

0:35:50.560 --> 0:35:55.640
<v Speaker 3>in the one notion, folks say documents are loose, well,

0:35:55.680 --> 0:35:59.920
<v Speaker 3>I would argue it's about asset selection, right. A document

0:36:00.440 --> 0:36:03.040
<v Speaker 3>is not going to help you if you just underwrote

0:36:03.040 --> 0:36:07.160
<v Speaker 3>the wrong asset. At the same time, a document, if

0:36:07.200 --> 0:36:10.319
<v Speaker 3>you're doing well and I'm not letting you lend more,

0:36:11.200 --> 0:36:12.319
<v Speaker 3>what do you think I'm going to do. If you're

0:36:12.320 --> 0:36:13.879
<v Speaker 3>doing well, I'm probably going to figure out a way

0:36:13.880 --> 0:36:15.680
<v Speaker 3>to fix the document to allow you to lend more.

0:36:15.760 --> 0:36:18.520
<v Speaker 3>So I think part of our you know, business, You're

0:36:18.560 --> 0:36:21.360
<v Speaker 3>right on app bats, but you know cove like the

0:36:21.400 --> 0:36:24.440
<v Speaker 3>market is mostly cove light. And even when you think

0:36:24.480 --> 0:36:27.680
<v Speaker 3>about structures with a covenant, a lot of times if

0:36:27.680 --> 0:36:30.560
<v Speaker 3>you actually hit that covenant, it's unclear that business right

0:36:31.400 --> 0:36:33.399
<v Speaker 3>is a is a going concern at that point.

0:36:33.400 --> 0:36:36.040
<v Speaker 2>If you need the document to save you, right, then

0:36:36.080 --> 0:36:38.000
<v Speaker 2>you've got a problem. You've already got a problem.

0:36:38.120 --> 0:36:39.680
<v Speaker 3>You're you're you're in.

0:36:39.680 --> 0:36:42.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, since we're actually talking about documents, and we have

0:36:42.160 --> 0:36:45.040
<v Speaker 2>done a recent episode about so called creditor on credit

0:36:45.120 --> 0:36:47.759
<v Speaker 2>or violence and how that works, et cetera. One thing

0:36:47.800 --> 0:36:50.560
<v Speaker 2>that came up with that, and I'm also curious about it.

0:36:50.560 --> 0:36:50.920
<v Speaker 3>It's like.

0:36:52.360 --> 0:36:55.680
<v Speaker 2>Legal expenses and you will detail, like you know, every

0:36:55.719 --> 0:36:59.400
<v Speaker 2>comma and all that stuff in these documents. I'm just curious, like,

0:36:59.480 --> 0:37:03.920
<v Speaker 2>over the course of your career, yes, how much have

0:37:04.040 --> 0:37:07.640
<v Speaker 2>you seen and to the perhaps to the point that

0:37:07.840 --> 0:37:14.240
<v Speaker 2>it extends exchanges, your expected return on investment, legal costs,

0:37:14.680 --> 0:37:17.239
<v Speaker 2>and the sort of rising lawyer fees, et cetera. To

0:37:17.320 --> 0:37:20.080
<v Speaker 2>check those documents regardless of how many covenants they have

0:37:20.360 --> 0:37:23.120
<v Speaker 2>in them, and if you've seen an evolution over time

0:37:23.239 --> 0:37:26.120
<v Speaker 2>since you've just been in the business of how much

0:37:26.160 --> 0:37:28.839
<v Speaker 2>of a deal resources end up going to the legal sete.

0:37:28.960 --> 0:37:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, how much do the lawyers bill you everywhere?

0:37:31.320 --> 0:37:31.919
<v Speaker 2>What have you seen?

0:37:32.080 --> 0:37:34.359
<v Speaker 3>So while I while I said I'm going to now

0:37:34.520 --> 0:37:37.879
<v Speaker 3>counter myself, okay, while I said the document won't save

0:37:37.960 --> 0:37:41.440
<v Speaker 3>you any deal, it's very important you have a document

0:37:41.840 --> 0:37:45.960
<v Speaker 3>that sort of expressly documents what what it is, the

0:37:46.000 --> 0:37:50.600
<v Speaker 3>intentions of the transaction. And it's very it's very good

0:37:50.600 --> 0:37:53.560
<v Speaker 3>to have governance in a document. Right. So if you

0:37:53.640 --> 0:37:56.720
<v Speaker 3>just think about public versus private markets, in a public

0:37:56.760 --> 0:38:00.200
<v Speaker 3>market situation, you're given two to three days to review

0:38:00.400 --> 0:38:02.839
<v Speaker 3>a three hundred pay lead to a document. Now, if

0:38:02.840 --> 0:38:06.359
<v Speaker 3>the deal is going very very well, arguably there isn't

0:38:06.360 --> 0:38:08.560
<v Speaker 3>a lot of opportunity for you to push back on

0:38:08.600 --> 0:38:11.480
<v Speaker 3>the document, right, so you kind of take the document

0:38:11.520 --> 0:38:13.799
<v Speaker 3>as is. In the public market and the issue with that,

0:38:13.880 --> 0:38:16.080
<v Speaker 3>there's a lot of and you said credit and current balance,

0:38:16.120 --> 0:38:18.719
<v Speaker 3>but there are a lot of opportunities for you to

0:38:18.800 --> 0:38:22.640
<v Speaker 3>take assets out of a restricted group, create new ass

0:38:22.680 --> 0:38:26.240
<v Speaker 3>new co and lending against that and take value away

0:38:26.280 --> 0:38:29.080
<v Speaker 3>from existing lenders. I think one thing that Private Credit

0:38:29.120 --> 0:38:31.799
<v Speaker 3>is very good at, and it's focused on that part

0:38:31.840 --> 0:38:35.400
<v Speaker 3>of the document. We've been very firm on making sure

0:38:35.880 --> 0:38:39.360
<v Speaker 3>that the ability to take assets out and create new

0:38:39.440 --> 0:38:42.120
<v Speaker 3>assets or new financing or new capital. We've limited that

0:38:42.200 --> 0:38:44.319
<v Speaker 3>quite a bit in private credit. But I will tell

0:38:44.360 --> 0:38:47.200
<v Speaker 3>you lawyers what argue inflation is real for them too

0:38:47.280 --> 0:38:51.000
<v Speaker 3>write so you know, and a lot of that deal

0:38:51.080 --> 0:38:53.840
<v Speaker 3>cost gets kind of you know, born at the beginning.

0:38:53.840 --> 0:38:56.959
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, lawyers. But you need lawyers, right, you need them.

0:38:57.280 --> 0:38:59.880
<v Speaker 3>You know, there's two reasons why deal usually gets hung up.

0:38:59.880 --> 0:39:02.759
<v Speaker 3>Is usually illegal or tax reason on the m and

0:39:02.800 --> 0:39:06.040
<v Speaker 3>a side on the financing side. And so lawyers are

0:39:06.080 --> 0:39:10.040
<v Speaker 3>an important part of our process, and we spend a

0:39:10.040 --> 0:39:12.480
<v Speaker 3>lot of time making sure we have the right cancel

0:39:12.640 --> 0:39:16.239
<v Speaker 3>who can understand and be able to move with us

0:39:16.320 --> 0:39:18.680
<v Speaker 3>if this goes sideways. We want to make sure your

0:39:18.920 --> 0:39:22.440
<v Speaker 3>bankruptcy and attorneys are really good. We want to make

0:39:22.480 --> 0:39:24.560
<v Speaker 3>sure that you are put You know, if you're thinking

0:39:24.600 --> 0:39:27.520
<v Speaker 3>about biotech or something where IP is important, how do

0:39:27.560 --> 0:39:30.640
<v Speaker 3>we make sure that IP you can't overlicense it. There's

0:39:30.680 --> 0:39:33.960
<v Speaker 3>a lot of nuances in the document that we find.

0:39:34.040 --> 0:39:35.920
<v Speaker 3>Lawyers are very valuable in our process.

0:39:36.080 --> 0:39:38.840
<v Speaker 1>So I just have one more question. But you know,

0:39:38.880 --> 0:39:41.040
<v Speaker 1>you've had such a long history in this market and

0:39:41.080 --> 0:39:44.480
<v Speaker 1>you've worked on so many interesting transactions. What deal are

0:39:44.480 --> 0:39:45.160
<v Speaker 1>you most proud of?

0:39:47.040 --> 0:39:50.759
<v Speaker 3>So when I was doing LBOs, it's almost like you're

0:39:50.800 --> 0:39:55.000
<v Speaker 3>watching the company and the sponsor get married and you

0:39:55.040 --> 0:39:57.839
<v Speaker 3>sit in the middle of that marriage and you're kind

0:39:57.880 --> 0:40:02.080
<v Speaker 3>of playing consultant. And all of my deals. I still

0:40:02.120 --> 0:40:06.040
<v Speaker 3>talk to the CEOs of those deals because you get

0:40:06.040 --> 0:40:08.439
<v Speaker 3>to know these people, your own planes with them for

0:40:08.560 --> 0:40:11.200
<v Speaker 3>ten days, you know, I know some of the quirks

0:40:11.280 --> 0:40:13.600
<v Speaker 3>or some CEOs. You know, you just get to know people.

0:40:13.719 --> 0:40:16.240
<v Speaker 3>You know, when I was doing the buyout, when Hughes

0:40:16.280 --> 0:40:19.759
<v Speaker 3>spun out direct TV, ROXE and Austin was a rock star, right,

0:40:19.760 --> 0:40:23.120
<v Speaker 3>a female CEO running direct TV a very profitable business,

0:40:23.280 --> 0:40:26.200
<v Speaker 3>and really really get to know interesting people. So I

0:40:26.480 --> 0:40:28.759
<v Speaker 3>would tell you they're all the deals I'm pretty proud.

0:40:28.760 --> 0:40:31.320
<v Speaker 3>There's probably one that was a bit of a disaster

0:40:31.480 --> 0:40:33.480
<v Speaker 3>that that you know. You know, we used to say,

0:40:33.520 --> 0:40:36.480
<v Speaker 3>if you made one bond payment, tell us.

0:40:36.400 --> 0:40:38.120
<v Speaker 1>About the deal that you're at least proud of.

0:40:38.440 --> 0:40:41.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so that was probably It's actually just a question,

0:40:41.600 --> 0:40:45.960
<v Speaker 2>but nobody really wants to ask that.

0:40:44.360 --> 0:40:46.640
<v Speaker 3>That deal was hard. That deal was hard. It made

0:40:46.640 --> 0:40:51.680
<v Speaker 3>one coupon payment and filed it is no okay, I

0:40:51.719 --> 0:40:54.680
<v Speaker 3>want to protect those involved. Okay, Yeah, but good question.

0:40:55.920 --> 0:40:58.200
<v Speaker 3>And I think you know so, I've done a lot

0:40:58.239 --> 0:41:01.160
<v Speaker 3>of deals, and most of them I'm pretty happy about.

0:41:01.160 --> 0:41:01.520
<v Speaker 3>All right.

0:41:01.560 --> 0:41:04.600
<v Speaker 2>I think you mentioned you take all right, you want

0:41:04.600 --> 0:41:07.200
<v Speaker 2>to be the first call, and to some extent, being

0:41:07.200 --> 0:41:10.799
<v Speaker 2>the first call is some combination of, you know, the

0:41:10.840 --> 0:41:13.759
<v Speaker 2>ability to give decent pricing and also just being a

0:41:13.760 --> 0:41:15.800
<v Speaker 2>likable guy that people want to talk to about their family.

0:41:15.880 --> 0:41:16.040
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:41:16.400 --> 0:41:18.400
<v Speaker 2>But I think you said you take twenty calls and

0:41:18.440 --> 0:41:19.800
<v Speaker 2>you maybe take two. Like what's so?

0:41:20.120 --> 0:41:23.440
<v Speaker 3>So what you're saying what I'm saying is out of

0:41:23.680 --> 0:41:26.719
<v Speaker 3>twenty calls, I get the last two or the most interesting.

0:41:26.800 --> 0:41:30.360
<v Speaker 3>So how do you actually well, like, engage eighteen times

0:41:30.400 --> 0:41:31.400
<v Speaker 3>and it goes nowhere?

0:41:31.480 --> 0:41:34.279
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but like is there a minimum, like you have

0:41:34.360 --> 0:41:36.960
<v Speaker 2>to say yes to You can't say no forever otherwise

0:41:36.960 --> 0:41:38.719
<v Speaker 2>at some point you'll no longer be the first call.

0:41:38.840 --> 0:41:41.160
<v Speaker 2>Right If I like, yeah, I might like talking to

0:41:41.200 --> 0:41:43.839
<v Speaker 2>Tracy a lot. But if she never, like in the end,

0:41:44.040 --> 0:41:46.400
<v Speaker 2>wants to consummate the deal, eventually she's no longer going

0:41:46.480 --> 0:41:47.000
<v Speaker 2>to be my first one.

0:41:47.040 --> 0:41:47.680
<v Speaker 3>That's how you say no.

0:41:48.040 --> 0:41:50.920
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so talk to us about saying no but still

0:41:50.960 --> 0:41:52.080
<v Speaker 2>maintaining first.

0:41:52.000 --> 0:41:54.200
<v Speaker 3>Sometimes we don't say no, We say here's how we

0:41:54.239 --> 0:41:56.520
<v Speaker 3>can get to a yes. Okay, right, So sometimes you

0:41:56.600 --> 0:41:57.759
<v Speaker 3>give a path to a yes.

0:41:57.960 --> 0:41:58.319
<v Speaker 2>All right.

0:41:58.480 --> 0:42:02.239
<v Speaker 3>Sometimes and I'm more like we're in today, you know,

0:42:02.400 --> 0:42:04.520
<v Speaker 3>I'm not clear, it's not clear that someone takes my

0:42:04.640 --> 0:42:07.680
<v Speaker 3>no offensively. There's a lot of capital, so it's easier

0:42:07.719 --> 0:42:09.799
<v Speaker 3>to say no in this market than a market where

0:42:09.800 --> 0:42:12.160
<v Speaker 3>there's not a lot of capital. And generally we may

0:42:12.200 --> 0:42:15.680
<v Speaker 3>say no. It may be a concentration issue. Maybe we

0:42:15.719 --> 0:42:17.239
<v Speaker 3>feel like we have too much of that type of

0:42:17.360 --> 0:42:20.600
<v Speaker 3>risk on our books. It could be an attachment issue

0:42:20.760 --> 0:42:24.479
<v Speaker 3>like leverage or attachment could be a problem. It could

0:42:24.480 --> 0:42:26.600
<v Speaker 3>be that we had an issue with a similar business

0:42:27.040 --> 0:42:29.600
<v Speaker 3>and maybe our LPs are fatigued in that in that

0:42:29.640 --> 0:42:31.399
<v Speaker 3>type of space, and we don't want to, you know,

0:42:31.520 --> 0:42:34.320
<v Speaker 3>sort of bring it up again. There there hosts of

0:42:34.400 --> 0:42:36.560
<v Speaker 3>reasons why we may say no. We may not get

0:42:36.560 --> 0:42:40.400
<v Speaker 3>there fast enough. Right, That happens in this market. But generally,

0:42:40.440 --> 0:42:42.560
<v Speaker 3>I think we're a pretty quick study. And what we

0:42:42.600 --> 0:42:44.799
<v Speaker 3>are very good at is we do exactly what we

0:42:44.840 --> 0:42:47.320
<v Speaker 3>say we're going to do. So if we put something

0:42:47.360 --> 0:42:50.520
<v Speaker 3>on paper, we're going to stand by that. And I

0:42:50.560 --> 0:42:52.600
<v Speaker 3>think that that goes a long ways. And I think

0:42:52.640 --> 0:42:54.279
<v Speaker 3>if people say, well, why do they call what do

0:42:54.400 --> 0:42:57.520
<v Speaker 3>they call? Oak Tree? I think we price risk right.

0:42:57.840 --> 0:43:00.120
<v Speaker 3>So in some markets that's a real big compe at

0:43:00.120 --> 0:43:02.480
<v Speaker 3>an advantage. And I think we don't. We don't be

0:43:02.560 --> 0:43:05.000
<v Speaker 3>as people. We say what we can do, We do

0:43:05.080 --> 0:43:08.399
<v Speaker 3>what we say, and that's it. And so sometimes our

0:43:08.440 --> 0:43:11.799
<v Speaker 3>answer is yeah, we like it, but we don't love it.

0:43:12.239 --> 0:43:14.719
<v Speaker 3>But if the sponsor or somebody's able to say, well,

0:43:14.760 --> 0:43:18.560
<v Speaker 3>OA Tree's involved, right, that gives credibility to the deal

0:43:19.120 --> 0:43:21.160
<v Speaker 3>and we can help them get it get it done

0:43:21.280 --> 0:43:23.840
<v Speaker 3>by saying we're involved, but we may not be the anchor,

0:43:23.920 --> 0:43:26.319
<v Speaker 3>we may not lead it, you know. And and when

0:43:26.360 --> 0:43:29.160
<v Speaker 3>you're when you're managing the size capital, we need to

0:43:29.239 --> 0:43:33.000
<v Speaker 3>write three to five hundred million dollar checks on most situations.

0:43:33.440 --> 0:43:35.480
<v Speaker 3>So we're always looking at the biggest deals with the

0:43:35.560 --> 0:43:39.520
<v Speaker 3>largest sponsors. Generally those are safer plays than the lower

0:43:39.640 --> 0:43:43.160
<v Speaker 3>lower middle markets. So we think there's less competition when

0:43:43.160 --> 0:43:45.879
<v Speaker 3>there's only seven seven of us that can write large

0:43:45.960 --> 0:43:49.080
<v Speaker 3>checks versus in smaller deals, hundreds of folks can write

0:43:49.160 --> 0:43:49.760
<v Speaker 3>small sex.

0:43:50.560 --> 0:43:53.200
<v Speaker 1>I have one more question. Actually I just remembered, but

0:43:53.760 --> 0:43:56.480
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned earlier that you want to be friendly with everyone,

0:43:56.960 --> 0:44:00.520
<v Speaker 1>including the banks that you know you're ostensibly incompetition with.

0:44:00.920 --> 0:44:03.799
<v Speaker 1>One thing that's been happening recently, it seems, is that

0:44:03.880 --> 0:44:06.359
<v Speaker 1>a lot of deals that were originally done in the

0:44:06.360 --> 0:44:10.640
<v Speaker 1>private credit market are getting refine out in the public market.

0:44:10.880 --> 0:44:11.160
<v Speaker 3>Great.

0:44:12.000 --> 0:44:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so first of all, why is that happening? And

0:44:14.440 --> 0:44:17.480
<v Speaker 1>then secondly, like is that a concern for someone like

0:44:17.480 --> 0:44:17.879
<v Speaker 1>oak Tree?

0:44:18.000 --> 0:44:21.520
<v Speaker 3>That is great? Like if we can be on two

0:44:21.640 --> 0:44:25.840
<v Speaker 3>or three year interim capital in most situations, that's good.

0:44:26.200 --> 0:44:29.000
<v Speaker 3>The reason why they're going back to the public market

0:44:29.120 --> 0:44:32.040
<v Speaker 3>is there's a spread between public and private, so there's

0:44:32.080 --> 0:44:35.160
<v Speaker 3>a cost reduction element, and then for the sponsor there's

0:44:35.160 --> 0:44:38.200
<v Speaker 3>more flexibility. Private credit is not meant to be the

0:44:38.200 --> 0:44:41.640
<v Speaker 3>most flexible. It's the most efficient, but it's not necessarily

0:44:41.680 --> 0:44:45.799
<v Speaker 3>the most flexible. And if I can create an institutionalize

0:44:46.080 --> 0:44:49.759
<v Speaker 3>and have a broader investor base, right, sometimes I can

0:44:49.800 --> 0:44:52.839
<v Speaker 3>get more things done if a lot more people own

0:44:52.920 --> 0:44:55.960
<v Speaker 3>it at very small sizes versus five or six owning

0:44:56.040 --> 0:44:59.400
<v Speaker 3>and at chunky sizes. So it's actually you want a

0:44:59.440 --> 0:45:03.719
<v Speaker 3>healthy market public and private, right. And when most folks say, oh,

0:45:03.760 --> 0:45:06.160
<v Speaker 3>you're losing deals to publicer I'm like, we probably should

0:45:06.160 --> 0:45:08.560
<v Speaker 3>have gone to a public market anyway. Right, it's rated,

0:45:09.040 --> 0:45:13.080
<v Speaker 3>it's it's an exten existing issuer. It's been into public markets.

0:45:13.520 --> 0:45:15.480
<v Speaker 3>It's just stay in public markets. You know. If you

0:45:15.520 --> 0:45:18.359
<v Speaker 3>think about the private credit market, we're one point seven

0:45:18.400 --> 0:45:21.439
<v Speaker 3>one point eight trillion going to probably three trillion. There's

0:45:21.520 --> 0:45:24.799
<v Speaker 3>ABF asset based finance, which is a new phenomenon, which

0:45:24.800 --> 0:45:27.840
<v Speaker 3>isn't really new, right. G Capital was a large ABF under.

0:45:27.920 --> 0:45:30.319
<v Speaker 3>But there's three trillion dollars of dry powder at private

0:45:30.360 --> 0:45:33.759
<v Speaker 3>equity firms. There's enough for us all to do and

0:45:33.840 --> 0:45:34.640
<v Speaker 3>be happy.

0:45:34.960 --> 0:45:37.120
<v Speaker 1>All right, Millwood Hobbes, thank you so much for coming

0:45:37.120 --> 0:45:40.160
<v Speaker 1>on all thoughts. Fantastic good Thank you so much.

0:45:40.200 --> 0:45:41.120
<v Speaker 3>I'm so glad we made this.

0:45:41.160 --> 0:45:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Happen, Joe. That was so much fun.

0:45:57.840 --> 0:46:01.400
<v Speaker 2>That was an unusually fun good episodes, even though all

0:46:01.440 --> 0:46:04.839
<v Speaker 2>of our guests are the perfect guest. You know, I'm

0:46:05.080 --> 0:46:07.359
<v Speaker 2>I really like and I think we should do more

0:46:07.760 --> 0:46:10.680
<v Speaker 2>about talking with the people whose job it is to

0:46:10.719 --> 0:46:12.080
<v Speaker 2>be nice to people and hanging.

0:46:11.920 --> 0:46:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Out with other people.

0:46:12.640 --> 0:46:15.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, because that's like an element there's a lot. Yeah,

0:46:15.200 --> 0:46:17.400
<v Speaker 2>we could, we could, but that's like an element in

0:46:17.480 --> 0:46:19.680
<v Speaker 2>finance that's still you know, Like I said, we talked

0:46:19.680 --> 0:46:22.040
<v Speaker 2>to a lot of screen people, and I'm as screen people,

0:46:22.360 --> 0:46:24.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm glad that there are still parts of the industry

0:46:25.280 --> 0:46:29.359
<v Speaker 2>where there's a big role for likable people who can

0:46:29.520 --> 0:46:31.480
<v Speaker 2>maintain relationships.

0:46:30.719 --> 0:46:31.920
<v Speaker 1>And stuff like that, play golf.

0:46:31.960 --> 0:46:33.160
<v Speaker 2>But that's part of being human, right.

0:46:33.719 --> 0:46:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Uh don't you have a whole song with the title

0:46:36.360 --> 0:46:39.239
<v Speaker 1>like all my friends are online or something, all my friends.

0:46:38.960 --> 0:46:41.120
<v Speaker 2>Are on my phone? Yeah, like I want to I

0:46:41.200 --> 0:46:44.080
<v Speaker 2>want to know more people who have friends, who.

0:46:43.800 --> 0:46:47.480
<v Speaker 1>Have friends, I RL. Yeah, all right, there's a lot

0:46:47.520 --> 0:46:50.520
<v Speaker 1>to pull out that. I did think like Millwood's early

0:46:50.640 --> 0:46:55.080
<v Speaker 1>point about banks being in the business of like pricing

0:46:55.360 --> 0:46:59.800
<v Speaker 1>end moving risk very quickly was a good one because

0:46:59.840 --> 0:47:03.440
<v Speaker 1>I think like that's kind of a fundamental difference with

0:47:03.560 --> 0:47:04.280
<v Speaker 1>private credit.

0:47:04.600 --> 0:47:07.640
<v Speaker 2>That was really interesting. I also and it was really

0:47:07.719 --> 0:47:12.000
<v Speaker 2>interesting hearing him talk about the tensions that emerge because

0:47:12.040 --> 0:47:13.400
<v Speaker 2>you want to be the first call and you want

0:47:13.440 --> 0:47:15.640
<v Speaker 2>to have a reputation for at least saying yes ten

0:47:15.680 --> 0:47:18.160
<v Speaker 2>percent of the time or something like that. Yeah, with

0:47:18.200 --> 0:47:21.919
<v Speaker 2>the demands of the actual PM who doesn't care about

0:47:21.920 --> 0:47:24.200
<v Speaker 2>all the times you have to say no. You know,

0:47:24.239 --> 0:47:27.560
<v Speaker 2>I think this is probably a sort of asymmetry that

0:47:27.680 --> 0:47:30.359
<v Speaker 2>comes up in a lot of sales based businesses, right

0:47:30.719 --> 0:47:34.080
<v Speaker 2>where you have some salesperson and their job is to

0:47:34.160 --> 0:47:36.319
<v Speaker 2>hit a commission or something like that, and then you

0:47:36.360 --> 0:47:38.879
<v Speaker 2>have like a product manager who's like, no, you can't

0:47:38.920 --> 0:47:41.440
<v Speaker 2>price it at this or we can't move the product

0:47:41.600 --> 0:47:43.560
<v Speaker 2>this fast. Yeah, this is just sort of like an

0:47:43.600 --> 0:47:46.640
<v Speaker 2>interesting dynamic that emerges in all businesses. And I really

0:47:46.719 --> 0:47:51.359
<v Speaker 2>enjoyed hearing him describe how he negotiates that implicitly.

0:47:51.040 --> 0:47:54.080
<v Speaker 1>The negotiations, because a lot of these deals involve like

0:47:54.160 --> 0:47:56.400
<v Speaker 1>so many different entities who are all coming at it

0:47:56.440 --> 0:47:58.560
<v Speaker 1>from a different angle with a different incentive.

0:47:59.200 --> 0:48:01.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so much, so much there, We'll have to talk

0:48:01.440 --> 0:48:01.920
<v Speaker 2>to Melody.

0:48:02.000 --> 0:48:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah we should, all right, shall we leave it there?

0:48:03.680 --> 0:48:04.359
<v Speaker 2>Let's leave it there.

0:48:04.480 --> 0:48:07.239
<v Speaker 1>This has been another episode of the Odd Loots podcast.

0:48:07.320 --> 0:48:10.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me at Tracy Alloway.

0:48:10.239 --> 0:48:12.920
<v Speaker 2>And I'm Joe Wisenthal. You can follow me at the Stalwart.

0:48:12.960 --> 0:48:16.040
<v Speaker 2>Follow our producers Carman Rodriguez at Carman Ermann, dash Ol

0:48:16.040 --> 0:48:19.120
<v Speaker 2>Bennett at Dashbot and Kilbrooks at Kilbrooks. Thank you to

0:48:19.120 --> 0:48:22.040
<v Speaker 2>our producer Moses On On more Oddlots content, go to

0:48:22.040 --> 0:48:25.280
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg dot com slash odd Lots. We have transcripts, a blog,

0:48:25.320 --> 0:48:27.719
<v Speaker 2>and a daily newsletter. You can chat about all of

0:48:27.760 --> 0:48:31.240
<v Speaker 2>these topics twenty four to seven in our discord Discord

0:48:31.280 --> 0:48:32.759
<v Speaker 2>dot gg slash.

0:48:32.400 --> 0:48:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Odlats and if you enjoy odd Lots, if you like

0:48:35.760 --> 0:48:38.239
<v Speaker 1>it when we talk about how to source deals in

0:48:38.280 --> 0:48:40.960
<v Speaker 1>the private credit market, then please leave us a positive

0:48:41.000 --> 0:48:44.480
<v Speaker 1>review on your favorite podcast platform. And remember, if you

0:48:44.520 --> 0:48:48.799
<v Speaker 1>are a Bloomberg subscriber, in addition to getting our daily newsletter,

0:48:49.080 --> 0:48:52.040
<v Speaker 1>you can also listen to all of our episodes absolutely

0:48:52.080 --> 0:48:54.040
<v Speaker 1>ad free. All you need to do is find me

0:48:54.080 --> 0:48:57.799
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg channel on Apple Podcasts and follow the instructions there.

0:48:58.160 --> 0:49:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening in