WEBVTT - This Is What 7% Mortgages Will Do To the Housing Market

0:00:10.000 --> 0:00:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to another episode of the All Thoughts Podcast.

0:00:13.320 --> 0:00:16.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tracy Alloway and I'm Joe Wise. Joe, there's nothing

0:00:16.800 --> 0:00:20.159
<v Speaker 1>better than a good chart. Let's see what chart do

0:00:20.160 --> 0:00:22.000
<v Speaker 1>you have for us today? What chart are you going

0:00:22.040 --> 0:00:25.360
<v Speaker 1>to ask listeners to visualize in their minds since they

0:00:25.360 --> 0:00:27.800
<v Speaker 1>can't actually probably like look at it right now, what

0:00:28.080 --> 0:00:30.080
<v Speaker 1>chart should they be thinking about. I actually have a

0:00:30.120 --> 0:00:33.479
<v Speaker 1>bunch in mind, like there are some extreme charts at

0:00:33.479 --> 0:00:36.279
<v Speaker 1>the moment, given everything that's been happening with markets. I'm

0:00:36.320 --> 0:00:39.280
<v Speaker 1>thinking in particular, you know, bond market volatility, what we

0:00:39.280 --> 0:00:43.200
<v Speaker 1>saw with sterling and guilts very recently. But if you're

0:00:43.280 --> 0:00:46.000
<v Speaker 1>looking for the most interesting charts at the moment, I

0:00:46.040 --> 0:00:49.159
<v Speaker 1>gotta say, I really think the housing market and the

0:00:49.200 --> 0:00:53.000
<v Speaker 1>mortgage market are where it's at. I completely agree with you.

0:00:53.120 --> 0:00:56.120
<v Speaker 1>And you know, like, look, the FED is raising rates

0:00:56.200 --> 0:01:00.320
<v Speaker 1>to slow down the economy to beat inflation, but the

0:01:00.400 --> 0:01:04.240
<v Speaker 1>number one sector of the economy that's most sensitive to

0:01:04.360 --> 0:01:06.759
<v Speaker 1>rate very directly is housing. And so you just see

0:01:06.800 --> 0:01:09.920
<v Speaker 1>some insane charts. We've been posting a bunch, but if

0:01:09.959 --> 0:01:11.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, you know, look at the price of a

0:01:11.760 --> 0:01:14.360
<v Speaker 1>new thirty year mortgage, just like through the roof compared

0:01:14.400 --> 0:01:17.399
<v Speaker 1>to six months ago. So many things like that, And

0:01:17.480 --> 0:01:20.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, housing is so crucial right to the overall economy.

0:01:20.720 --> 0:01:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Everyone wants to buy one or wants to live in one.

0:01:23.240 --> 0:01:26.280
<v Speaker 1>And what does it mean when these numbers are moving

0:01:26.400 --> 0:01:29.560
<v Speaker 1>so fast so hard? Right, Well, everyone also has an

0:01:29.560 --> 0:01:33.160
<v Speaker 1>opinion on warehousing is going. But you know, you mentioned

0:01:33.200 --> 0:01:35.040
<v Speaker 1>a couple of those charts you can look at pretty

0:01:35.120 --> 0:01:39.240
<v Speaker 1>much anything, Like the pure acceleration in mortgage rates has

0:01:39.280 --> 0:01:43.679
<v Speaker 1>been unprecedented, The spread between mortgages and the tenure U S.

0:01:43.720 --> 0:01:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Treasury is now at a record, Housing affordabilities at a

0:01:47.440 --> 0:01:50.320
<v Speaker 1>record though, Like there are so many you can choose from,

0:01:50.360 --> 0:01:54.760
<v Speaker 1>but it really feels like, given the unusual nous of

0:01:54.760 --> 0:01:58.000
<v Speaker 1>the situation and what we're seeing in some of these charts,

0:01:58.240 --> 0:02:00.480
<v Speaker 1>it feels like there's a lot of uncertainties. So, yes,

0:02:00.560 --> 0:02:03.800
<v Speaker 1>everyone would expect higher interest rates to have a negative

0:02:03.840 --> 0:02:06.760
<v Speaker 1>impact on the housing market, but we've also been talking

0:02:06.760 --> 0:02:09.880
<v Speaker 1>about how there's low inventory and you know, there's a

0:02:09.960 --> 0:02:13.200
<v Speaker 1>structural need for more housing in the US, so maybe

0:02:13.200 --> 0:02:15.520
<v Speaker 1>things are different this time. It's a really weird market

0:02:15.639 --> 0:02:18.560
<v Speaker 1>because you know, I think everybody is still kind of

0:02:18.600 --> 0:02:21.560
<v Speaker 1>scarred from the Great Financial crisis, and you see these

0:02:21.680 --> 0:02:24.680
<v Speaker 1>huge moves. You know, well, our house prices don't they

0:02:24.680 --> 0:02:26.960
<v Speaker 1>have to fall off a cliff. And yet if no

0:02:27.040 --> 0:02:29.720
<v Speaker 1>one is forced to sell, what's going to happen? Is

0:02:29.800 --> 0:02:32.440
<v Speaker 1>the housing market just gonna go away, like no transactions

0:02:32.520 --> 0:02:35.240
<v Speaker 1>except for people who like you know, get divorced or

0:02:35.240 --> 0:02:37.280
<v Speaker 1>like have to prove or something like that. Like seriously,

0:02:37.320 --> 0:02:41.120
<v Speaker 1>it seems like a possibility. So much weirdness. You know,

0:02:41.160 --> 0:02:42.760
<v Speaker 1>pull up a chart of like how many people are

0:02:42.760 --> 0:02:45.400
<v Speaker 1>refined their mortgage. I mean it's basically the closest thing

0:02:45.440 --> 0:02:47.480
<v Speaker 1>you find to like zero and a chart like no

0:02:47.480 --> 0:02:51.360
<v Speaker 1>one is refined with mortgages that yeah at seven percent

0:02:51.480 --> 0:02:53.240
<v Speaker 1>or whatever. I thought you were going to mention the reats,

0:02:53.360 --> 0:02:56.000
<v Speaker 1>which is another good chart as well. So there are

0:02:56.040 --> 0:02:59.079
<v Speaker 1>big questions about this market and it does. Yeah. And

0:02:59.200 --> 0:03:00.799
<v Speaker 1>the other thing going on is you have a lot

0:03:00.800 --> 0:03:04.680
<v Speaker 1>of people talking about market structure issues, so how mortgage

0:03:04.760 --> 0:03:07.200
<v Speaker 1>rates are actually set, what's going on in the market

0:03:07.240 --> 0:03:10.760
<v Speaker 1>for mortgage backed securities. A lot of people have been saying, oh,

0:03:10.800 --> 0:03:13.880
<v Speaker 1>there's you know, it's broken, there's something going on. So

0:03:14.080 --> 0:03:15.960
<v Speaker 1>I am very pleased to say we are going to

0:03:16.000 --> 0:03:19.200
<v Speaker 1>get into all of these issues, or at least try to,

0:03:19.280 --> 0:03:21.280
<v Speaker 1>because there is a lot of uncertainty, and we really

0:03:21.320 --> 0:03:24.160
<v Speaker 1>do have the perfect guest. Let's do it. I'm really excited.

0:03:24.160 --> 0:03:26.600
<v Speaker 1>I have so many questions. Let's get god. Okay, we

0:03:26.639 --> 0:03:29.920
<v Speaker 1>are going to be speaking with Jim Egan. He is

0:03:30.080 --> 0:03:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Morgan Stanley's US housing strategist and does some great research

0:03:34.639 --> 0:03:36.760
<v Speaker 1>on all of these topics. So, Jim, thank you so

0:03:36.840 --> 0:03:39.200
<v Speaker 1>much for coming on. Thank you so much for having me.

0:03:39.240 --> 0:03:41.760
<v Speaker 1>It's an honor to be here. So maybe just to

0:03:41.800 --> 0:03:46.600
<v Speaker 1>begin with, we should talk about is this environment that unusual?

0:03:46.800 --> 0:03:49.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, you've been analyzing US housing for a very

0:03:50.040 --> 0:03:52.880
<v Speaker 1>very long time. When you look at what's going on today,

0:03:53.200 --> 0:03:56.480
<v Speaker 1>how remarkable is it too? I would say that a

0:03:56.600 --> 0:04:00.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of these statistics that we use to cast things

0:04:00.680 --> 0:04:03.680
<v Speaker 1>like housing activity, and by that we mean home sales

0:04:03.800 --> 0:04:06.880
<v Speaker 1>or housing starts, as well as home prices, are at

0:04:06.960 --> 0:04:09.920
<v Speaker 1>levels that we either haven't seen before, or if we've

0:04:09.920 --> 0:04:12.480
<v Speaker 1>seen them, we haven't seen them for decades. I think

0:04:12.840 --> 0:04:15.760
<v Speaker 1>you've already mentioned a few of the pretty important aspects

0:04:15.800 --> 0:04:18.640
<v Speaker 1>of this, like when we think about the housing market

0:04:18.720 --> 0:04:20.720
<v Speaker 1>and taking a step back, we have a four pillared

0:04:20.760 --> 0:04:26.400
<v Speaker 1>view supply and demand, affordability and credit availability. Those first

0:04:26.440 --> 0:04:30.040
<v Speaker 1>two we kind of think they're the larger structural, kind

0:04:30.040 --> 0:04:33.560
<v Speaker 1>of underlying tides of the housing market. It's difficult to

0:04:33.680 --> 0:04:35.560
<v Speaker 1>change them so much on a month to month or

0:04:35.560 --> 0:04:39.480
<v Speaker 1>a year to year basis. Affordability and availability are those

0:04:39.520 --> 0:04:43.239
<v Speaker 1>dials that determine kind of the shorter term changes to prices,

0:04:43.240 --> 0:04:46.560
<v Speaker 1>to activity. And I think just to highlight one of them,

0:04:46.880 --> 0:04:51.800
<v Speaker 1>housing affordability. It's deteriorating. Not only is affordability itself at

0:04:51.800 --> 0:04:54.120
<v Speaker 1>a level we haven't seen in at least the past

0:04:54.200 --> 0:04:56.760
<v Speaker 1>thirty to forty years when we're comfortable with the data,

0:04:57.120 --> 0:05:00.120
<v Speaker 1>but the pace with which it's deteriorating. If we look

0:05:00.160 --> 0:05:02.440
<v Speaker 1>at it over the past three months, over the past

0:05:02.520 --> 0:05:05.960
<v Speaker 1>six months, over the past twelve months, we've never seen

0:05:06.600 --> 0:05:12.040
<v Speaker 1>affordability deteriorate this quickly in the housing market. So how

0:05:12.160 --> 0:05:14.520
<v Speaker 1>is it that housing prices are going to crash? Because

0:05:14.800 --> 0:05:17.240
<v Speaker 1>if the price of a new thirty year mortgage in

0:05:17.279 --> 0:05:20.040
<v Speaker 1>many cases, I mean, like I want to look it

0:05:20.120 --> 0:05:21.760
<v Speaker 1>up because I wrote about it last week, but I think,

0:05:21.800 --> 0:05:25.560
<v Speaker 1>like fifty a huge jump. Like what is would you?

0:05:25.560 --> 0:05:28.520
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's start with that question, a what how

0:05:28.560 --> 0:05:31.240
<v Speaker 1>do you? What is the jump or the decline and

0:05:31.279 --> 0:05:34.280
<v Speaker 1>affordability like, how would you convey it what we've seen

0:05:34.760 --> 0:05:37.599
<v Speaker 1>and how does how is like the market not going

0:05:37.680 --> 0:05:41.440
<v Speaker 1>to crash with such an affordability shock. I think that's

0:05:41.560 --> 0:05:44.680
<v Speaker 1>an incredibly important question because it is something we get

0:05:44.720 --> 0:05:48.200
<v Speaker 1>asked so frequently as people they're short, like their memories

0:05:48.360 --> 0:05:51.400
<v Speaker 1>go back to the Great Financial Crisis and they're seeing

0:05:52.240 --> 0:05:55.320
<v Speaker 1>not similar trends and affordability deterioration. But that's the last

0:05:55.360 --> 0:05:57.839
<v Speaker 1>time things were this significant, right, And so I think

0:05:58.279 --> 0:06:01.440
<v Speaker 1>first of all, you asked the tent to the affordability deterioration.

0:06:03.040 --> 0:06:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Home prices each of the past sixteen months would have

0:06:06.400 --> 0:06:08.480
<v Speaker 1>been a record in year over year growth if we

0:06:08.480 --> 0:06:10.520
<v Speaker 1>were comparing it to two thousand and four and two

0:06:10.520 --> 0:06:15.279
<v Speaker 1>thousand five. We have significantly surpassed that. When you add

0:06:15.360 --> 0:06:18.080
<v Speaker 1>mortgage rates up over three basis point since the beginning

0:06:18.080 --> 0:06:19.919
<v Speaker 1>of the year, those things are going to combine to

0:06:20.160 --> 0:06:22.559
<v Speaker 1>lead to the monthly mortgage payment on the median priced

0:06:22.560 --> 0:06:26.440
<v Speaker 1>home up over fifty year over year. If we include

0:06:26.440 --> 0:06:29.560
<v Speaker 1>incomes the kind of third variable on that affordability calculation,

0:06:30.400 --> 0:06:33.120
<v Speaker 1>we're only a forty six percent year over year. So

0:06:33.360 --> 0:06:37.360
<v Speaker 1>we've deteriorated incredibly substantially. The GFC that year over year

0:06:37.360 --> 0:06:41.400
<v Speaker 1>deterioration never exceeded thirty We capped out in the twenties.

0:06:41.920 --> 0:06:45.480
<v Speaker 1>But why we think home prices aren't going to crash here,

0:06:45.560 --> 0:06:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Why we do think this time is different is because

0:06:48.520 --> 0:06:51.479
<v Speaker 1>the question we have to ask after affordability deterioration is

0:06:52.040 --> 0:06:57.040
<v Speaker 1>whose affordability just deteriorated. The structure of the mortgage market

0:06:57.080 --> 0:06:59.760
<v Speaker 1>itself is very different today than when we compare it

0:06:59.760 --> 0:07:01.480
<v Speaker 1>to two thousand four to two thousand and seven. If

0:07:01.480 --> 0:07:04.719
<v Speaker 1>I were to just take one specific aspect of it,

0:07:04.720 --> 0:07:07.960
<v Speaker 1>it's the overwhelming percentage of mortgages that are fixed rate.

0:07:08.600 --> 0:07:11.120
<v Speaker 1>We think that over of the outstanding mortgage market is

0:07:11.120 --> 0:07:14.800
<v Speaker 1>fixed rate. We were much more heavily skewed towards adjustable

0:07:14.840 --> 0:07:17.440
<v Speaker 1>rate mortgages in the early two thousand's, and so as

0:07:17.480 --> 0:07:21.040
<v Speaker 1>mortgage rates went higher, the monthly payment for current homeowners

0:07:21.080 --> 0:07:24.400
<v Speaker 1>was resetting higher as well this time around, especially when

0:07:24.400 --> 0:07:28.560
<v Speaker 1>you consider the record amount of mortgage regination volumes, the

0:07:28.600 --> 0:07:31.280
<v Speaker 1>fact that we broke that for a new record amount

0:07:31.280 --> 0:07:34.160
<v Speaker 1>of mortgage reginations, most of these homeowners were able to

0:07:34.200 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 1>either buy their home or we finance their mortgage at

0:07:37.000 --> 0:07:41.440
<v Speaker 1>historically low rates. Their affordability is locked in for thirty years.

0:07:42.400 --> 0:07:46.080
<v Speaker 1>They're not seeing affordability deteriorate. This deterioration is coming for

0:07:46.720 --> 0:07:49.800
<v Speaker 1>first time homebuyers perspective home buyers. That's where this sits.

0:07:50.000 --> 0:07:52.640
<v Speaker 1>It's always the first time home buyers that seemed to

0:07:52.640 --> 0:07:54.760
<v Speaker 1>be in the worst place, it feels like. But this

0:07:54.840 --> 0:07:57.440
<v Speaker 1>is actually something I wanted to ask you. So, given

0:07:57.480 --> 0:08:02.360
<v Speaker 1>the preponderance of fixed rate do higher rates basically just

0:08:02.440 --> 0:08:05.520
<v Speaker 1>mean that people who got a good deal are going

0:08:05.560 --> 0:08:08.640
<v Speaker 1>to be reluctant to sell, especially at a time when

0:08:08.680 --> 0:08:11.640
<v Speaker 1>you know prices might be softening, but definitely at a

0:08:11.680 --> 0:08:13.960
<v Speaker 1>time when they know that if they're going to take out,

0:08:14.040 --> 0:08:15.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, another mortgage, it's going to be at a

0:08:15.720 --> 0:08:18.800
<v Speaker 1>higher rate. Absolutely, and it's something we refer to as

0:08:18.840 --> 0:08:20.800
<v Speaker 1>the lock in effect. They're kind of locked in at

0:08:20.800 --> 0:08:24.400
<v Speaker 1>their current homes at these lower rates. And we mentioned

0:08:24.440 --> 0:08:27.480
<v Speaker 1>housing activity versus home prices earlier. We do think this

0:08:27.560 --> 0:08:30.000
<v Speaker 1>is going to lead to a different evolution of those

0:08:30.040 --> 0:08:33.520
<v Speaker 1>two kind of paths of the housing market. Current homeowners

0:08:33.880 --> 0:08:35.800
<v Speaker 1>in order to sell their home, and a lot of instances,

0:08:35.840 --> 0:08:37.640
<v Speaker 1>would have to take out a mortgage that might be

0:08:37.679 --> 0:08:41.599
<v Speaker 1>two dred fifty bases points higher than their current mortgage.

0:08:42.000 --> 0:08:44.760
<v Speaker 1>That becomes prohibitively expensive when you combine it with how

0:08:44.840 --> 0:08:48.320
<v Speaker 1>much equity they have in their homes. They're just not

0:08:48.400 --> 0:08:51.120
<v Speaker 1>going to be willing to sell their home at the

0:08:51.160 --> 0:08:53.760
<v Speaker 1>lower price point that might be more affordable for the

0:08:53.800 --> 0:08:56.880
<v Speaker 1>first time home buyer. So what we think we're already seeing,

0:08:56.960 --> 0:09:00.240
<v Speaker 1>what we anticipate continuing to see going forward, is that

0:09:00.320 --> 0:09:03.760
<v Speaker 1>the inventory, the listings of existing homes available for sale.

0:09:03.880 --> 0:09:06.280
<v Speaker 1>We have that data going back for single unit homes

0:09:06.480 --> 0:09:10.240
<v Speaker 1>to the early nineties. It was never lower than it

0:09:10.320 --> 0:09:13.800
<v Speaker 1>was in earlier this year. We've been increasing just a

0:09:13.920 --> 0:09:16.200
<v Speaker 1>very little bit off the bottom for the past three months.

0:09:16.559 --> 0:09:18.680
<v Speaker 1>But we think that they're going to keep listings tight,

0:09:19.120 --> 0:09:22.440
<v Speaker 1>which will keep home prices more supported. Like if we

0:09:22.440 --> 0:09:25.719
<v Speaker 1>think about Kase Shiller probably the most frequently quoted home

0:09:25.720 --> 0:09:29.040
<v Speaker 1>price index, it uses something called to repeat sales methodology,

0:09:29.160 --> 0:09:30.680
<v Speaker 1>So when a home is transacted, it looks at the

0:09:30.720 --> 0:09:32.960
<v Speaker 1>last time that home was transacted, and so if we're

0:09:33.000 --> 0:09:36.080
<v Speaker 1>not going to be selling those homes at lower prices

0:09:36.080 --> 0:09:39.360
<v Speaker 1>than they were purchased, that's going to help support home

0:09:39.360 --> 0:09:42.800
<v Speaker 1>price activity. But on the other side of this, it

0:09:42.840 --> 0:09:45.720
<v Speaker 1>means that that existing homeowner is also not buying another

0:09:45.760 --> 0:09:47.880
<v Speaker 1>home after they sell theirs, which we think is going

0:09:47.920 --> 0:09:51.280
<v Speaker 1>to kind of exacerbate the decrease in sales volumes. So

0:09:51.320 --> 0:09:54.600
<v Speaker 1>you can see a sharp drop in sales without necessarily

0:09:54.679 --> 0:09:59.119
<v Speaker 1>that corresponding drop at home prices. So it's really I mean, obviously,

0:09:59.120 --> 0:10:01.360
<v Speaker 1>if you're looking at the the first time home buyer,

0:10:01.440 --> 0:10:03.440
<v Speaker 1>this is not a pleasant time. So it's a bad

0:10:03.480 --> 0:10:05.160
<v Speaker 1>time to buy a home. It's a bad time to

0:10:05.240 --> 0:10:11.000
<v Speaker 1>sell a home. So just for renters too, for homeowners,

0:10:11.040 --> 0:10:13.000
<v Speaker 1>for renters, for everyone really, and it seems like it's

0:10:13.000 --> 0:10:15.640
<v Speaker 1>a really bad time to be a broker or realtor.

0:10:15.720 --> 0:10:18.200
<v Speaker 1>It seems like that is the space that's going to

0:10:18.320 --> 0:10:20.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of like bear the burden of adjustment. You know.

0:10:20.720 --> 0:10:23.800
<v Speaker 1>It's just interesting, getting back to like the price question.

0:10:24.240 --> 0:10:27.040
<v Speaker 1>The two things that it seems like, going back to

0:10:27.080 --> 0:10:30.280
<v Speaker 1>the housing crash that really for sales were a these

0:10:30.320 --> 0:10:34.760
<v Speaker 1>mortgage resets, So suddenly affordable affordable mortgage becomes a less

0:10:34.760 --> 0:10:39.840
<v Speaker 1>affordable mortgage and a deteriorating labor market. So if you

0:10:40.040 --> 0:10:42.040
<v Speaker 1>get laid off and you don't have much equity in

0:10:42.040 --> 0:10:44.719
<v Speaker 1>your home, you kind of have to sell it. It's

0:10:44.920 --> 0:10:47.600
<v Speaker 1>neither of those are currently in place. We agree with

0:10:47.640 --> 0:10:51.120
<v Speaker 1>that statement completely, right, I think that, And we've talked

0:10:51.120 --> 0:10:53.760
<v Speaker 1>about affordability. The other pillar that was kind of the

0:10:53.800 --> 0:10:56.880
<v Speaker 1>short term dial that we focus on is credit availability. Yeah.

0:10:56.920 --> 0:11:01.200
<v Speaker 1>I think when people hear credit availability, especially with the GFC,

0:11:01.640 --> 0:11:04.800
<v Speaker 1>in your mind, you go towards the borrow or characteristic

0:11:04.840 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 1>piece of that. You go towards FICO scores, loan to

0:11:06.960 --> 0:11:09.600
<v Speaker 1>value ratios, debt to income ratios. Right, the kind of

0:11:09.679 --> 0:11:12.920
<v Speaker 1>characteristics that we like to think of when we're thinking

0:11:12.960 --> 0:11:15.400
<v Speaker 1>about the probability of a mortgage defaulting or something along

0:11:15.400 --> 0:11:17.320
<v Speaker 1>those lines, right eether the likelihood that it will prepay.

0:11:17.360 --> 0:11:19.720
<v Speaker 1>On the other side of that, we don't capture the

0:11:19.760 --> 0:11:24.000
<v Speaker 1>product aspect, the product risk aspect of credit availability as much.

0:11:24.200 --> 0:11:26.079
<v Speaker 1>And that's what you just hit on. Right. You have

0:11:26.200 --> 0:11:30.439
<v Speaker 1>this proliferation like the subprime mortgage back securities market, for instance,

0:11:30.800 --> 0:11:32.800
<v Speaker 1>that got so large in two thousand four to two

0:11:32.800 --> 0:11:35.920
<v Speaker 1>thousand seven. First of all, that market doesn't exist anymore,

0:11:36.200 --> 0:11:38.720
<v Speaker 1>but a big characteristic of that market where things we

0:11:38.760 --> 0:11:43.680
<v Speaker 1>called or short reset arms that were fixed at lower

0:11:43.760 --> 0:11:46.280
<v Speaker 1>rates for two or three years before adjusting for the

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:48.560
<v Speaker 1>final twenty seven or twenty eight years of that mortgage

0:11:48.600 --> 0:11:51.199
<v Speaker 1>is life. Those products made up a significant chunk of

0:11:51.200 --> 0:11:54.400
<v Speaker 1>the mortgage market back then. They almost effectively do not

0:11:54.480 --> 0:11:58.359
<v Speaker 1>exist today. And when you think about what that inherently

0:11:58.480 --> 0:12:01.800
<v Speaker 1>asks owner to do, a mortgage to borrower to do

0:12:02.360 --> 0:12:05.120
<v Speaker 1>is in month twenty five or thirty seven, when that

0:12:05.160 --> 0:12:07.360
<v Speaker 1>payments about to change to a place that could be unaffordable,

0:12:07.440 --> 0:12:09.240
<v Speaker 1>especially as the unemployment rate is creeping up and they

0:12:09.280 --> 0:12:11.760
<v Speaker 1>may not have that income anymore. They need to be

0:12:11.800 --> 0:12:15.240
<v Speaker 1>able to refinance that mortgage. If credit standards are tightening

0:12:15.280 --> 0:12:17.640
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, if home prices have flattened out,

0:12:17.640 --> 0:12:19.040
<v Speaker 1>if they've started to come down a little bit, and

0:12:19.080 --> 0:12:21.880
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden there isn't excess equity in the house,

0:12:22.360 --> 0:12:24.360
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, that refinance is not going to

0:12:24.400 --> 0:12:26.880
<v Speaker 1>be feasible for that borrow where and they're effectively in

0:12:26.960 --> 0:12:29.120
<v Speaker 1>a place where it's going to be very difficult for

0:12:29.160 --> 0:12:31.840
<v Speaker 1>them to make that monthly payment. Because those products don't

0:12:31.840 --> 0:12:34.360
<v Speaker 1>exist anymore. You just do not have those resets. You

0:12:34.400 --> 0:12:38.199
<v Speaker 1>don't have a homeowner that's reliance upon the credit availability

0:12:38.240 --> 0:12:42.680
<v Speaker 1>environment going forward, and credit availability it tightened, we gave

0:12:42.760 --> 0:12:45.480
<v Speaker 1>up six years worth of easing in the six months

0:12:45.679 --> 0:12:48.560
<v Speaker 1>after the onset of COVID in March, where at the

0:12:48.559 --> 0:12:52.760
<v Speaker 1>tightest levels we've been in effectively twenty years. And if anything,

0:12:53.360 --> 0:12:57.120
<v Speaker 1>because of risk weighted asset stresses at large banks, we

0:12:57.160 --> 0:12:59.520
<v Speaker 1>think the pathroom here might even be towards tighter lending standards.

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:04.480
<v Speaker 1>So the equality of mortgage credit is incredibly healthy. UM,

0:13:04.520 --> 0:13:07.760
<v Speaker 1>we don't think that because of the lack of reliance

0:13:07.760 --> 0:13:09.880
<v Speaker 1>of homeowners on the ability to refinance, we don't know

0:13:09.920 --> 0:13:12.120
<v Speaker 1>that's going to force them into defaults and foreclosures. But

0:13:12.160 --> 0:13:14.160
<v Speaker 1>that also means that we think that the risk of

0:13:14.160 --> 0:13:17.400
<v Speaker 1>a dramatic increase to defaults and foreclosures that could we

0:13:17.400 --> 0:13:19.679
<v Speaker 1>think about what could bring home prices down. It's those

0:13:19.720 --> 0:13:28.000
<v Speaker 1>distressed transactions, those forced sellers. UM. Divorce is very distressing.

0:13:28.400 --> 0:13:31.360
<v Speaker 1>I want to get into distress sellers. But just before

0:13:31.360 --> 0:13:33.520
<v Speaker 1>we do. The other thing I think about when I

0:13:33.559 --> 0:13:37.400
<v Speaker 1>think about pre two thousand eight housing and the subprime

0:13:37.440 --> 0:13:40.800
<v Speaker 1>crisis is I think about inventory, and the housing market

0:13:40.920 --> 0:13:44.320
<v Speaker 1>was so hot, credit, as you just described, was so ample.

0:13:44.480 --> 0:13:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Everyone could get alone. You know, there are all those

0:13:46.520 --> 0:13:49.480
<v Speaker 1>scenes from that big short movie about going down to

0:13:49.520 --> 0:13:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Florida and everyone has like five properties. But the other

0:13:52.800 --> 0:13:55.120
<v Speaker 1>thing I think about is just lots of homes getting

0:13:55.120 --> 0:13:59.960
<v Speaker 1>built in that environment. How are you viewing the inventor

0:14:00.080 --> 0:14:02.559
<v Speaker 1>or question at the moment and how does that feed

0:14:02.600 --> 0:14:06.600
<v Speaker 1>into your housing forecasts. We think it's one of, if

0:14:06.640 --> 0:14:09.240
<v Speaker 1>not the most important statistic right now. When we think

0:14:09.280 --> 0:14:13.720
<v Speaker 1>about inventories, we view it from from three angles. There's

0:14:13.800 --> 0:14:17.080
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned homebuilding, there's the new inventory, there's the listing

0:14:17.080 --> 0:14:19.800
<v Speaker 1>we talked about, the lack in effect existing inventories, and

0:14:19.840 --> 0:14:22.840
<v Speaker 1>then there's what we call shadow inventory or distressed Those

0:14:22.840 --> 0:14:25.400
<v Speaker 1>are those defaults and foreclosures. That's what you would need

0:14:25.680 --> 0:14:28.560
<v Speaker 1>to really provide kind of downward momentum for big year

0:14:28.600 --> 0:14:31.160
<v Speaker 1>over year decreases and home prices. As I mentioned, because

0:14:31.160 --> 0:14:33.480
<v Speaker 1>of credit availability, who we don't think that last piece

0:14:33.520 --> 0:14:35.440
<v Speaker 1>is going to play a material role in this cycle.

0:14:35.520 --> 0:14:39.400
<v Speaker 1>So you think about the other two existing inventories. We

0:14:39.440 --> 0:14:43.400
<v Speaker 1>already mentioned the lack in effect. One statistic that we've

0:14:43.440 --> 0:14:46.600
<v Speaker 1>been thrown or we've been discussing a lot recently is

0:14:46.600 --> 0:14:50.400
<v Speaker 1>months of supply. Now, months of supply has been despite

0:14:50.400 --> 0:14:55.280
<v Speaker 1>how low inventories are, the fastest increasing piece of the

0:14:55.320 --> 0:14:57.600
<v Speaker 1>inventory metric universe, if you will, And the reason for

0:14:57.640 --> 0:15:01.120
<v Speaker 1>that is because it's it's an equation. The numerators inventories

0:15:01.480 --> 0:15:04.800
<v Speaker 1>started to increase a little bit from their all time lows,

0:15:04.960 --> 0:15:09.240
<v Speaker 1>the denominator of sales sales volumes have already pulled back materially. Right.

0:15:09.320 --> 0:15:12.960
<v Speaker 1>So months of supply is the number of months that

0:15:13.040 --> 0:15:16.080
<v Speaker 1>it would take for the existing inventory to get sold

0:15:16.200 --> 0:15:20.160
<v Speaker 1>at the current sales pace, exactly. And if we think

0:15:20.160 --> 0:15:22.360
<v Speaker 1>about the absolute level of months of supply right now,

0:15:22.560 --> 0:15:25.160
<v Speaker 1>we're sitting right around four. And that's total months of

0:15:25.160 --> 0:15:27.840
<v Speaker 1>supply for units for sale for both existing and new

0:15:28.040 --> 0:15:31.480
<v Speaker 1>versus total new and existing home sales, right, and that

0:15:31.600 --> 0:15:34.360
<v Speaker 1>number the general rule of them is if you're below

0:15:34.920 --> 0:15:38.480
<v Speaker 1>six months of supply, then that's a tight inventory market. Right.

0:15:38.520 --> 0:15:42.040
<v Speaker 1>That is theoretically going to be a seller's market because

0:15:42.040 --> 0:15:44.920
<v Speaker 1>there's more demand than there is supply of those homes.

0:15:45.360 --> 0:15:49.000
<v Speaker 1>And that historically has seemed to hold true. If we

0:15:49.040 --> 0:15:52.400
<v Speaker 1>look at total months of supply going back to today,

0:15:52.800 --> 0:15:55.200
<v Speaker 1>whenever months of supply has been below six, and again

0:15:55.200 --> 0:15:58.480
<v Speaker 1>we're at four right now. Home prices have continued to

0:15:58.520 --> 0:16:00.840
<v Speaker 1>be climbing six months forward, and that is one hundred

0:16:00.840 --> 0:16:05.000
<v Speaker 1>that has been the case of the time. How low

0:16:05.400 --> 0:16:07.560
<v Speaker 1>could it go? So I'm just looking at the last

0:16:07.840 --> 0:16:09.360
<v Speaker 1>and you know, this is what's so fun about how

0:16:09.440 --> 0:16:11.200
<v Speaker 1>is it is there's just a million ways to slice

0:16:11.200 --> 0:16:13.000
<v Speaker 1>and dice this, But I'm just looking at the last.

0:16:13.040 --> 0:16:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Like existing home sales for August seasonally adjusted annualized rate

0:16:17.400 --> 0:16:20.000
<v Speaker 1>four point eight million, but like that's a still bit

0:16:20.080 --> 0:16:22.640
<v Speaker 1>higher than uh, you know, that's higher than it was

0:16:22.680 --> 0:16:26.640
<v Speaker 1>in couldn't continue to go substantially lower from here? And

0:16:26.840 --> 0:16:30.000
<v Speaker 1>if this divergence that you're talking about where activity and

0:16:30.120 --> 0:16:33.440
<v Speaker 1>prices diverged, how extreme could that get? Yes, so we

0:16:33.560 --> 0:16:35.360
<v Speaker 1>do think that it will continue to go lower from

0:16:35.360 --> 0:16:39.280
<v Speaker 1>here with current homeowners locked in with affordability pressures for

0:16:39.720 --> 0:16:42.160
<v Speaker 1>from new home buyers. In fact, if we look at

0:16:42.200 --> 0:16:46.360
<v Speaker 1>the affordability deterioration, we comp that to the Great Financial Crisis.

0:16:46.440 --> 0:16:49.160
<v Speaker 1>It's been worse, it's been faster. But if we kind

0:16:49.160 --> 0:16:53.080
<v Speaker 1>of index both periods to win the affordability deterioration really started,

0:16:53.480 --> 0:16:56.200
<v Speaker 1>we're out pacing the Great Financial Crisis to the downside

0:16:56.520 --> 0:16:59.040
<v Speaker 1>in terms of how fast sales have have fallen. We

0:16:59.120 --> 0:17:02.760
<v Speaker 1>think that the conditions that we've talked about could allow

0:17:02.800 --> 0:17:05.040
<v Speaker 1>that to remain the case for at least the next

0:17:05.440 --> 0:17:07.919
<v Speaker 1>six to twelve months. Our existing home sales forecast in

0:17:07.920 --> 0:17:12.359
<v Speaker 1>our base case have us falling basically to below levels,

0:17:12.400 --> 0:17:13.960
<v Speaker 1>so not getting We don't think that the peak to

0:17:14.040 --> 0:17:16.040
<v Speaker 1>trough will be as substantial as it was during the

0:17:16.040 --> 0:17:19.119
<v Speaker 1>Great Financial Crisis, so we're not entertaining those levels. But

0:17:19.160 --> 0:17:22.600
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned right now we can see it coming down

0:17:22.640 --> 0:17:42.000
<v Speaker 1>about levels in the base case. What kind of supply

0:17:42.200 --> 0:17:45.400
<v Speaker 1>response would you expect from the home builders in this

0:17:45.520 --> 0:17:48.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of environment. So you know, people have been talking

0:17:48.880 --> 0:17:51.880
<v Speaker 1>about the US being structurally short on housing for many

0:17:51.960 --> 0:17:54.320
<v Speaker 1>years now, but at the same time interest rates are

0:17:54.359 --> 0:17:57.280
<v Speaker 1>going up. There's this big question mark over the future

0:17:57.320 --> 0:18:00.920
<v Speaker 1>of the market. As we've been discussing, would you expect

0:18:00.920 --> 0:18:04.320
<v Speaker 1>them to ramp up production in that environment? It seems unlikely.

0:18:04.480 --> 0:18:06.359
<v Speaker 1>We agree with the final piece of that statement. We

0:18:06.400 --> 0:18:08.879
<v Speaker 1>do think that it is unlikely right now. We agree

0:18:09.200 --> 0:18:12.600
<v Speaker 1>structurally short supply right now, we have estimates on that.

0:18:12.720 --> 0:18:15.959
<v Speaker 1>We wanted to be conservative two million units underbuilt. If

0:18:15.960 --> 0:18:17.480
<v Speaker 1>we wanted to be a little bit more aggressive in

0:18:17.480 --> 0:18:20.920
<v Speaker 1>our assumptions, we can get that numbered six million units underbuild.

0:18:21.080 --> 0:18:24.919
<v Speaker 1>You would think that that would call for a higher

0:18:25.560 --> 0:18:27.080
<v Speaker 1>rate of home building. And by the way, those estimates

0:18:27.119 --> 0:18:30.120
<v Speaker 1>are for both single unit and multi unit housing holistically.

0:18:30.800 --> 0:18:35.000
<v Speaker 1>But we're seeing some interesting dynamics there. Builders have been

0:18:35.080 --> 0:18:38.680
<v Speaker 1>responding to what had been record growth and home prices,

0:18:39.040 --> 0:18:42.480
<v Speaker 1>this tight inventory environment. Building single unit building in particular

0:18:42.560 --> 0:18:46.720
<v Speaker 1>increased pretty spectacularly in the immediate aftermath of COVID. In fact,

0:18:46.920 --> 0:18:49.120
<v Speaker 1>we hit all time lows. The data there goes back

0:18:49.160 --> 0:18:51.960
<v Speaker 1>to that we use in kind of the winter of

0:18:52.960 --> 0:18:55.200
<v Speaker 1>So this was kind of a final pop after almost

0:18:55.240 --> 0:19:00.119
<v Speaker 1>a decade of growth in building volumes. But now we

0:19:00.119 --> 0:19:03.680
<v Speaker 1>we've plateaued, and you mentioned a little bit earlier, Tracy,

0:19:04.600 --> 0:19:07.560
<v Speaker 1>the difference in building volumes today versus the great financial crisis.

0:19:08.359 --> 0:19:10.720
<v Speaker 1>Let's level set with what that decade of growth and

0:19:10.720 --> 0:19:13.480
<v Speaker 1>building has where that's brought us. If I look at

0:19:13.520 --> 0:19:17.800
<v Speaker 1>twelve months trailing single unit starts, we're only back to levels.

0:19:17.840 --> 0:19:19.800
<v Speaker 1>So we haven't crossed the two thousand We haven't. We

0:19:19.800 --> 0:19:21.919
<v Speaker 1>haven't gotten to two thousand two or the real building

0:19:21.960 --> 0:19:24.960
<v Speaker 1>pop in oh, four oh five or six. But because

0:19:25.000 --> 0:19:27.560
<v Speaker 1>of things like supply chain issues we talked about labor

0:19:27.560 --> 0:19:31.119
<v Speaker 1>market issues very briefly earlier. The units under construction, we

0:19:31.160 --> 0:19:33.240
<v Speaker 1>pay so much attention to starts. We pay so much

0:19:33.240 --> 0:19:37.200
<v Speaker 1>attention to completions, the time in between those when the

0:19:37.200 --> 0:19:39.480
<v Speaker 1>shovel's broken ground, but you haven't finished the home yet.

0:19:39.520 --> 0:19:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Because of these backlogs, single unit starts back to levels,

0:19:43.320 --> 0:19:46.280
<v Speaker 1>units under construction back to two thousand four levels, so

0:19:46.320 --> 0:19:47.879
<v Speaker 1>you do have a little bit of a backlog that

0:19:47.920 --> 0:19:50.439
<v Speaker 1>needs to be cleared. We do think that this is

0:19:50.480 --> 0:19:53.360
<v Speaker 1>going to when you combine it with affordability pressures when

0:19:53.359 --> 0:19:57.280
<v Speaker 1>you can buy, which is exaggerated by the mortgage rate moves.

0:19:57.560 --> 0:19:59.360
<v Speaker 1>We think this is going to lead builders to pull back.

0:19:59.359 --> 0:20:01.280
<v Speaker 1>We think single IT starts are going to come down

0:20:01.520 --> 0:20:03.680
<v Speaker 1>pretty sharply in the fourth quarter. We think they're gonna

0:20:03.680 --> 0:20:07.960
<v Speaker 1>be downe compared to so so we don't think that

0:20:08.040 --> 0:20:11.720
<v Speaker 1>it's as strong environment for that behavior. Yeah, I'm looking

0:20:11.760 --> 0:20:13.840
<v Speaker 1>at the well, I'm actually I pulled up a chart

0:20:13.880 --> 0:20:17.800
<v Speaker 1>of multi family units under currently under construction. It's one

0:20:17.800 --> 0:20:20.199
<v Speaker 1>of the few lines in housing that is still like

0:20:20.240 --> 0:20:22.480
<v Speaker 1>a straight up right because I guess it's just so

0:20:22.520 --> 0:20:25.879
<v Speaker 1>slow with the process of building all these things that

0:20:26.200 --> 0:20:28.280
<v Speaker 1>they're still they're still getting done. I guess if you

0:20:28.280 --> 0:20:32.040
<v Speaker 1>start a new construction, you finish it we'd like to

0:20:32.040 --> 0:20:34.040
<v Speaker 1>believe that it once you break ground, that you're going

0:20:34.080 --> 0:20:36.119
<v Speaker 1>to make your way towards finishing and at least some

0:20:36.160 --> 0:20:38.160
<v Speaker 1>point in the future. And you're right, the multi unit

0:20:38.240 --> 0:20:41.560
<v Speaker 1>under construction that there's one of the charts we see

0:20:41.560 --> 0:20:44.320
<v Speaker 1>pretty frequently is total units under construction is finally passed

0:20:44.640 --> 0:20:47.359
<v Speaker 1>the Great Financial Crisis, And we do think that you

0:20:47.400 --> 0:20:48.840
<v Speaker 1>have to take a step back and look at this

0:20:48.960 --> 0:20:52.399
<v Speaker 1>single unit versus multi unit narrative. Single unit, as I

0:20:52.440 --> 0:20:55.439
<v Speaker 1>mentioned back to oh four multi unit, I believe the

0:20:55.480 --> 0:20:59.320
<v Speaker 1>numbers back to where it was in the ninety's it

0:20:59.400 --> 0:21:03.480
<v Speaker 1>is looking now looking at single family. Um, yeah, it

0:21:03.520 --> 0:21:05.879
<v Speaker 1>looks like I guess back to for you know, I

0:21:05.920 --> 0:21:08.400
<v Speaker 1>was in Dallas recently and the number of multi family

0:21:08.520 --> 0:21:11.720
<v Speaker 1>homes being like that happened built there, and it's just

0:21:12.440 --> 0:21:14.160
<v Speaker 1>crazy compared to what it used to be. It used

0:21:14.160 --> 0:21:17.040
<v Speaker 1>to all be single family. But anyway, since we're talking

0:21:17.080 --> 0:21:20.480
<v Speaker 1>about supply, one thing that has come up on the

0:21:20.480 --> 0:21:23.959
<v Speaker 1>show at various times is the idea of a certain

0:21:24.040 --> 0:21:28.800
<v Speaker 1>cohort of homeowners, the baby boomers, many many of whom

0:21:28.880 --> 0:21:31.600
<v Speaker 1>bought their houses at relatively low prices, and have seen

0:21:31.640 --> 0:21:35.919
<v Speaker 1>them appreciate the idea that you know, eventually, let me

0:21:35.920 --> 0:21:38.080
<v Speaker 1>think how to phrase this. Eventually they're going to pass

0:21:38.119 --> 0:21:41.199
<v Speaker 1>on um maybe you know, they'll retire or have to

0:21:41.200 --> 0:21:44.439
<v Speaker 1>go to nursing homes or something will force that inventory

0:21:44.480 --> 0:21:47.320
<v Speaker 1>to get unlocked. Is that something that you're keeping an

0:21:47.359 --> 0:21:51.600
<v Speaker 1>eye on. Yes. From a demographic perspective on the housing market,

0:21:51.640 --> 0:21:53.840
<v Speaker 1>we spend a lot of time talking about millennials and

0:21:53.920 --> 0:21:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Gen Z and the demand that they're going to represent

0:21:57.280 --> 0:22:00.320
<v Speaker 1>as they roll through. We do think that you need

0:22:00.359 --> 0:22:03.280
<v Speaker 1>to start focusing on the baby boomers. When we look

0:22:03.280 --> 0:22:06.080
<v Speaker 1>at the percentage of homes of owned homes that are

0:22:06.080 --> 0:22:09.280
<v Speaker 1>held by people over the age of sixty from two

0:22:09.320 --> 0:22:12.920
<v Speaker 1>thousand twelve, it is a very consistent number. It's roughly

0:22:13.680 --> 0:22:17.520
<v Speaker 1>the housing stock it oscillates between from two thousand twelve

0:22:17.600 --> 0:22:22.760
<v Speaker 1>to today. It's gone from to roughly thirty one out

0:22:22.760 --> 0:22:24.600
<v Speaker 1>of every three homes in this country is held by

0:22:24.640 --> 0:22:27.560
<v Speaker 1>somebody over the age of sixty five. When we look

0:22:27.600 --> 0:22:30.720
<v Speaker 1>at how long they've owned those homes, over of them,

0:22:30.960 --> 0:22:35.359
<v Speaker 1>roughly fifty four moved in before the year two thousand.

0:22:36.200 --> 0:22:39.199
<v Speaker 1>So when we think about our activity forecasts, we think

0:22:39.240 --> 0:22:41.560
<v Speaker 1>sales are going to fall for the dynamics we've discussed.

0:22:41.560 --> 0:22:43.600
<v Speaker 1>We think prices are going to be more protected. That

0:22:43.600 --> 0:22:45.480
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean that they won't turn a little bit negative

0:22:45.560 --> 0:22:48.719
<v Speaker 1>year over year. But when we think about what are

0:22:48.720 --> 0:22:53.119
<v Speaker 1>the stresses to that scenario, it's where could an uneconomic seller,

0:22:53.200 --> 0:22:56.359
<v Speaker 1>if you will work at an uneconomic seller, evolve from.

0:22:56.440 --> 0:23:00.240
<v Speaker 1>And we do highlight this group as one of those

0:23:00.240 --> 0:23:02.640
<v Speaker 1>potential and economic sellers. They have a lot of equity

0:23:02.640 --> 0:23:05.000
<v Speaker 1>in their home if they owned a home. They own

0:23:05.000 --> 0:23:07.479
<v Speaker 1>a home today, odds are I mean, we know that

0:23:07.600 --> 0:23:09.240
<v Speaker 1>over half of them moved in before two thousands. They

0:23:09.240 --> 0:23:11.200
<v Speaker 1>own that home. In two thousand and eight, they saw

0:23:11.280 --> 0:23:14.480
<v Speaker 1>the property, the value of their property fall, they saw

0:23:14.520 --> 0:23:17.320
<v Speaker 1>it stay below its original value for almost a decade.

0:23:17.920 --> 0:23:20.879
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps as headlines come through, they're going to be more

0:23:20.920 --> 0:23:23.360
<v Speaker 1>willing to sell that property at a lower price point

0:23:23.359 --> 0:23:25.320
<v Speaker 1>than we expect given the lock and effect that we've

0:23:25.320 --> 0:23:29.240
<v Speaker 1>talked about. Now, the counter argument there is aging in place.

0:23:29.520 --> 0:23:31.399
<v Speaker 1>That trend has happened a lot more frequently. People are

0:23:31.440 --> 0:23:34.040
<v Speaker 1>living longer, they're living in their homes longer. We don't

0:23:34.080 --> 0:23:37.720
<v Speaker 1>expect this supply to be a factor in our price

0:23:37.800 --> 0:23:41.040
<v Speaker 1>forecasts for at least another decade, but if that would

0:23:41.040 --> 0:23:43.960
<v Speaker 1>have come up sooner, that's where we kind of get

0:23:44.000 --> 0:23:45.880
<v Speaker 1>into more of a bearer case, and that would provide

0:23:45.960 --> 0:23:49.000
<v Speaker 1>more pressure on home prices than we're currently expecting. Before

0:23:49.000 --> 0:23:52.560
<v Speaker 1>I forget just on the home prices question itself, some

0:23:52.720 --> 0:23:56.760
<v Speaker 1>of these indusicries have shown some declines, right, yes, And

0:23:57.760 --> 0:24:00.199
<v Speaker 1>when we think about home prices, there are a lot

0:24:00.200 --> 0:24:02.680
<v Speaker 1>of different industries, a lot of different ways to interpret

0:24:02.720 --> 0:24:05.320
<v Speaker 1>the indusseries. And so I think that we actually just

0:24:05.400 --> 0:24:09.720
<v Speaker 1>revised our home price forecast down the last week, and

0:24:09.880 --> 0:24:12.640
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that precipitated that we talked about

0:24:12.680 --> 0:24:15.879
<v Speaker 1>your rear home prices. Month over month home prices for

0:24:16.000 --> 0:24:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Case Shiller turns negative in July. First time that's happened

0:24:19.880 --> 0:24:22.959
<v Speaker 1>since on a seasonally adjusted basis, I believe, since two

0:24:22.960 --> 0:24:25.520
<v Speaker 1>thousand twelve. First time that happened in a decade. Now.

0:24:25.840 --> 0:24:27.960
<v Speaker 1>We already thought the pace of growth was gonna slow.

0:24:28.280 --> 0:24:30.280
<v Speaker 1>We just expected that to happen in September. It's happening

0:24:30.320 --> 0:24:32.480
<v Speaker 1>a little early, and it's happening in certain parts of

0:24:32.480 --> 0:24:36.440
<v Speaker 1>the country more so than others. California we're seeing price

0:24:36.480 --> 0:24:39.800
<v Speaker 1>declines on a month over month basis. Denver, Seattle, Portland.

0:24:39.920 --> 0:24:42.639
<v Speaker 1>Those are some of the bigger, especially case Shiller M says,

0:24:42.680 --> 0:24:45.720
<v Speaker 1>that are already showing that month over month price decrease,

0:24:45.760 --> 0:24:47.880
<v Speaker 1>and in some instances you're seeing three or four percentage

0:24:47.920 --> 0:24:51.440
<v Speaker 1>points down, you're over year even in those metros were

0:24:51.440 --> 0:24:54.240
<v Speaker 1>still up nine. These are some places that have seen

0:24:54.240 --> 0:24:58.040
<v Speaker 1>it up much more spectacularly. But that second derivative, if

0:24:58.040 --> 0:24:59.880
<v Speaker 1>you will, is changing and the pace of that decreases

0:24:59.920 --> 0:25:02.520
<v Speaker 1>a ccelerating and that should continue to happen as we

0:25:02.560 --> 0:25:04.440
<v Speaker 1>go into the back half of this year the first

0:25:04.440 --> 0:25:08.639
<v Speaker 1>half of next year. So why shouldn't someone look at

0:25:08.640 --> 0:25:11.000
<v Speaker 1>that say, oh, it's happening. The price declined, Like, why

0:25:11.119 --> 0:25:15.199
<v Speaker 1>is that not a signal of actual like sustained declines.

0:25:15.720 --> 0:25:18.280
<v Speaker 1>So the reason that we don't think it's a signal

0:25:18.320 --> 0:25:22.800
<v Speaker 1>for actual sustained declines is because a for true home

0:25:22.840 --> 0:25:25.720
<v Speaker 1>price declines to to be dramatically in excess of what

0:25:25.720 --> 0:25:28.359
<v Speaker 1>we're forecasting. So so year over year eight ten plus

0:25:28.400 --> 0:25:30.680
<v Speaker 1>per cent um, we think you would need to stress.

0:25:30.720 --> 0:25:32.879
<v Speaker 1>You need forced sellers that really need to hit a

0:25:32.880 --> 0:25:35.919
<v Speaker 1>lower bit on their home. You've mentioned kind of the

0:25:35.960 --> 0:25:38.240
<v Speaker 1>things that we typically look at from a turnover perspective,

0:25:38.960 --> 0:25:41.440
<v Speaker 1>death and divorce other metrics that would make you forced

0:25:41.440 --> 0:25:44.480
<v Speaker 1>to sell a home that can be roughly five percent

0:25:44.560 --> 0:25:47.800
<v Speaker 1>of the housing market. That that's that's not enough of

0:25:47.840 --> 0:25:49.639
<v Speaker 1>a of a metric for us to really weigh on

0:25:49.640 --> 0:25:53.000
<v Speaker 1>home prices. But the other pieces is supply listings of

0:25:53.040 --> 0:25:56.320
<v Speaker 1>homes is so tight if people aren't willing to sell

0:25:56.760 --> 0:25:59.399
<v Speaker 1>into the kind of depressed demand that we're talking about.

0:25:59.680 --> 0:26:01.439
<v Speaker 1>What we think you're going to see is a market

0:26:01.440 --> 0:26:04.560
<v Speaker 1>that kind of stalls out here, right, and that that

0:26:04.600 --> 0:26:06.639
<v Speaker 1>will lead national home prices to show a little bit

0:26:06.640 --> 0:26:09.159
<v Speaker 1>of weakness. Our forecast of down three percent year over

0:26:09.240 --> 0:26:12.359
<v Speaker 1>year December three, Like, the negative headline attached to that

0:26:12.480 --> 0:26:16.680
<v Speaker 1>is that's down seven percent from today. Okay, the positive

0:26:16.720 --> 0:26:18.560
<v Speaker 1>headline attached to that is that only brings home prices

0:26:18.560 --> 0:26:22.480
<v Speaker 1>back to January. Crazy it's been up until very recently,

0:26:22.720 --> 0:26:25.160
<v Speaker 1>and that brings you back to January, which is thirty

0:26:25.440 --> 0:26:30.080
<v Speaker 1>above March. So you changed your forecast relatively recently. I

0:26:30.080 --> 0:26:33.000
<v Speaker 1>think you're looking for I mean basically flat or something

0:26:33.040 --> 0:26:35.080
<v Speaker 1>like that, and you changed it to minus three percent.

0:26:35.200 --> 0:26:37.440
<v Speaker 1>As you just mentioned, what was the sort of tipping

0:26:37.480 --> 0:26:39.760
<v Speaker 1>point that you saw on the market that made you

0:26:39.840 --> 0:26:42.919
<v Speaker 1>hit the button on that. Yes, So I think the

0:26:42.960 --> 0:26:45.480
<v Speaker 1>fact that we saw home prices turned negative a little

0:26:45.480 --> 0:26:47.840
<v Speaker 1>bit earlier than we thought they would, sales volumes were

0:26:47.880 --> 0:26:50.360
<v Speaker 1>coming in a little bit weaker than our forecasts had expected,

0:26:50.680 --> 0:26:55.280
<v Speaker 1>but forward looking expectations changed as well. Like when we

0:26:55.280 --> 0:26:57.960
<v Speaker 1>think about research at Morgan Stanley, we're taking into account

0:26:58.160 --> 0:27:00.600
<v Speaker 1>what all of our various teams are saying. Our US

0:27:00.640 --> 0:27:04.639
<v Speaker 1>economics team, given the persistence of inflation, they recently raised

0:27:04.680 --> 0:27:07.480
<v Speaker 1>their call for monetary tightening, adding basis points worth of

0:27:07.520 --> 0:27:11.359
<v Speaker 1>hikes to the November, December and January meetings. Are US

0:27:11.480 --> 0:27:14.199
<v Speaker 1>interest rate strategists on the back of that, raised their

0:27:14.240 --> 0:27:16.920
<v Speaker 1>forecast for the tenure, so they raised their forecast fifty

0:27:16.920 --> 0:27:20.119
<v Speaker 1>basis points. In December, they raised its seventy basis points

0:27:20.119 --> 0:27:23.080
<v Speaker 1>to three point seven five for the middle of next year.

0:27:23.800 --> 0:27:27.240
<v Speaker 1>That changes where we think mortgage rates could be throughout

0:27:27.280 --> 0:27:29.560
<v Speaker 1>next year, which means that the deterioration we've seen an

0:27:29.560 --> 0:27:33.080
<v Speaker 1>affordability there won't be any real relief next year now.

0:27:33.400 --> 0:27:36.360
<v Speaker 1>And so we were expecting that perhaps kind of during

0:27:36.400 --> 0:27:38.520
<v Speaker 1>the spring selling season next year that was providing a

0:27:38.520 --> 0:27:42.720
<v Speaker 1>little bit more support. That support is now absent. So

0:27:42.840 --> 0:27:45.280
<v Speaker 1>this actually leads really nicely into something that Joe and

0:27:45.320 --> 0:27:48.280
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to ask you about, which is when interest

0:27:48.400 --> 0:27:53.760
<v Speaker 1>rates go up, how does that actually feed into mortgage rates? Because,

0:27:53.800 --> 0:27:55.760
<v Speaker 1>as we mentioned at the beginning, you know, we have

0:27:55.960 --> 0:28:00.040
<v Speaker 1>seen this unprecedented rise in mortgage rates. I think the

0:28:00.080 --> 0:28:03.520
<v Speaker 1>average thirty years at like almost seven percent in the

0:28:03.600 --> 0:28:06.560
<v Speaker 1>US now six point seven five something like that, and

0:28:06.600 --> 0:28:11.320
<v Speaker 1>there's this huge spread between tenure treasury yields and mortgage

0:28:11.400 --> 0:28:14.480
<v Speaker 1>rates again something else that's at a record. What's going

0:28:14.520 --> 0:28:16.520
<v Speaker 1>on here? Why does it seem like mortgage rates are

0:28:16.560 --> 0:28:20.320
<v Speaker 1>increasing at an even faster pace than benchmark interest rates.

0:28:20.600 --> 0:28:22.680
<v Speaker 1>I think there's there's a couple of reasons for why

0:28:22.960 --> 0:28:25.760
<v Speaker 1>that spread that you're talking about between mortgage rates and

0:28:25.800 --> 0:28:29.399
<v Speaker 1>treasury rates has increased, And one of them is, if

0:28:29.400 --> 0:28:34.120
<v Speaker 1>you're a mortgage backed securities investor, your structurally short rate volatility.

0:28:34.240 --> 0:28:37.120
<v Speaker 1>And not only have mortgage rates or interest rates moved higher,

0:28:37.119 --> 0:28:40.440
<v Speaker 1>but volatility has been incredibly high the day to day,

0:28:40.520 --> 0:28:42.880
<v Speaker 1>week to week swings we're seeing in the tenure treasury

0:28:43.160 --> 0:28:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Like that volatility would in and of itself kind of

0:28:47.240 --> 0:28:49.400
<v Speaker 1>weigh a little bit on the spread that we're talking about.

0:28:49.720 --> 0:28:52.920
<v Speaker 1>But I think the other aspect to this is who

0:28:52.960 --> 0:28:57.240
<v Speaker 1>are your buyers of mortgage backed securities who kind of

0:28:57.280 --> 0:28:59.720
<v Speaker 1>supports that that mortgage rate. For the past couple of

0:28:59.760 --> 0:29:03.320
<v Speaker 1>years of FED has been an incredibly large buyer quantitative easing,

0:29:03.400 --> 0:29:07.320
<v Speaker 1>they were directly buying mortgages. They're no longer buying mortgages

0:29:08.080 --> 0:29:12.600
<v Speaker 1>thanks because of risk weighted asset pressures. They're no longer

0:29:12.640 --> 0:29:15.160
<v Speaker 1>going to be buying conventional kind of Fannie and Freddie

0:29:15.440 --> 0:29:19.480
<v Speaker 1>mortgages going forward, what we're seeing from a dollar perspective,

0:29:19.520 --> 0:29:21.440
<v Speaker 1>across currency perspective might make it a little bit more

0:29:21.440 --> 0:29:25.000
<v Speaker 1>difficult for overseas investors to be buying mortgages. And so

0:29:25.120 --> 0:29:27.560
<v Speaker 1>when when you have so many of what have been

0:29:27.640 --> 0:29:30.920
<v Speaker 1>your larger buyers over the past couple of years, for

0:29:31.000 --> 0:29:34.720
<v Speaker 1>various reasons, not as willing and able to step into

0:29:34.720 --> 0:29:37.560
<v Speaker 1>the market right now, combined with the rate volatility we've seen,

0:29:37.640 --> 0:29:40.280
<v Speaker 1>or perhaps even exaggerated by the rate volatility we've seen,

0:29:40.720 --> 0:29:42.280
<v Speaker 1>that can kind of lead to that gap in spreads.

0:29:42.640 --> 0:29:47.400
<v Speaker 1>There's a certain irony that post GFC capital requirements are

0:29:47.480 --> 0:29:51.560
<v Speaker 1>now like leading to higher mortgage rates and potentially causing

0:29:51.640 --> 0:29:54.440
<v Speaker 1>an affordability issue. Isn't there too? There is you know,

0:29:54.600 --> 0:29:56.680
<v Speaker 1>this is the part of the interview where I say,

0:29:56.800 --> 0:29:59.480
<v Speaker 1>could you clarify for our audience, But what I actually

0:29:59.520 --> 0:30:02.800
<v Speaker 1>mean is to clarify for me. Can you walk through though,

0:30:03.200 --> 0:30:09.400
<v Speaker 1>why MBS investor is structurally short rate volatility specifically? How

0:30:09.440 --> 0:30:14.040
<v Speaker 1>does that work? Yeah, it's basically because of, for better

0:30:14.160 --> 0:30:18.200
<v Speaker 1>or worse than, the freely prepayable nature of mortgage marketing

0:30:18.200 --> 0:30:21.880
<v Speaker 1>in the United States. Right as rates rally, as as

0:30:21.920 --> 0:30:24.800
<v Speaker 1>interest rates come down, as mortgage rates follow them down,

0:30:25.200 --> 0:30:27.200
<v Speaker 1>your homeowner is going to be much more likely to

0:30:27.280 --> 0:30:30.400
<v Speaker 1>prepay that mortgage returning principle to the investor in a

0:30:30.440 --> 0:30:35.040
<v Speaker 1>lower rate environment where their ability to invest it is challenged. Um,

0:30:35.080 --> 0:30:37.560
<v Speaker 1>as mortgage rates go higher, all of a sudden, that

0:30:37.560 --> 0:30:39.880
<v Speaker 1>mortgage backed security that you bought but you had an

0:30:39.880 --> 0:30:42.760
<v Speaker 1>expected duration on it's going to be longer as people

0:30:42.800 --> 0:30:45.520
<v Speaker 1>are more incentivized or locked in to stay in their

0:30:45.560 --> 0:30:47.160
<v Speaker 1>home right now. And that that's kind of the tip

0:30:47.200 --> 0:30:50.120
<v Speaker 1>of the iceberg for that. Okay, I have another mortgage

0:30:50.240 --> 0:30:54.600
<v Speaker 1>rate financing question, and the Mortgage Brokers Association, you know,

0:30:54.600 --> 0:30:58.120
<v Speaker 1>their mortgage applications data came out and I saw that

0:30:58.360 --> 0:31:02.560
<v Speaker 1>REFI activity is down, and my question is why is

0:31:02.600 --> 0:31:05.400
<v Speaker 1>it not down a percent? How is there anyone still

0:31:05.480 --> 0:31:10.160
<v Speaker 1>refining a mortgage today? Who is who? Like I've refined

0:31:10.160 --> 0:31:12.120
<v Speaker 1>a mortgage, but that was a few years ago, un

0:31:12.160 --> 0:31:15.880
<v Speaker 1>rage fund Like, who's refining today? That is a fantastic question.

0:31:16.280 --> 0:31:19.680
<v Speaker 1>And we think that harkening back to kind of the

0:31:19.680 --> 0:31:24.360
<v Speaker 1>beginning of our conversation, it feeds into how much of

0:31:24.400 --> 0:31:26.640
<v Speaker 1>the housing market, in the mortgage market are at levels

0:31:26.640 --> 0:31:30.760
<v Speaker 1>that we haven't seen before. So borrowers are out of

0:31:30.760 --> 0:31:33.600
<v Speaker 1>the money to refinance, so you're thinking that should be zero, Right,

0:31:33.720 --> 0:31:35.840
<v Speaker 1>They're more out of the money than than they've probably

0:31:35.840 --> 0:31:37.720
<v Speaker 1>ever been on a weight at average basis. But on

0:31:37.760 --> 0:31:42.040
<v Speaker 1>the other side, homeowners have more equity in their homes

0:31:42.040 --> 0:31:44.760
<v Speaker 1>than they've ever had before. And so if we're talking

0:31:44.800 --> 0:31:47.920
<v Speaker 1>about a borrower, who if you bought a home with

0:31:47.480 --> 0:31:50.920
<v Speaker 1>a down and home prices are up almost over the

0:31:50.960 --> 0:31:53.000
<v Speaker 1>past two and a half years, you can take a

0:31:53.040 --> 0:31:55.200
<v Speaker 1>little bit of that equity out of your home. So

0:31:55.280 --> 0:31:58.640
<v Speaker 1>that goes into the refight index that takeing. Yes, so

0:31:58.720 --> 0:32:01.000
<v Speaker 1>REFI as a combination of both rate and term, So

0:32:01.040 --> 0:32:03.160
<v Speaker 1>people who just refinanced to get a lower mortgage, right,

0:32:03.200 --> 0:32:05.840
<v Speaker 1>but also the cash out what you've got is he.

0:32:22.920 --> 0:32:28.280
<v Speaker 1>So you mentioned MBS investors being structurally short volatility, which

0:32:28.360 --> 0:32:30.680
<v Speaker 1>makes me want to ask about where are the g

0:32:30.880 --> 0:32:34.640
<v Speaker 1>s c s nowadays? Like they used to be a

0:32:34.720 --> 0:32:38.560
<v Speaker 1>big market stabilizer. No, it's stabilizing force right in the market,

0:32:38.680 --> 0:32:43.360
<v Speaker 1>and it seems like they're sort of not there anymore.

0:32:43.400 --> 0:32:47.760
<v Speaker 1>To put it mildly, I think that they're like when

0:32:47.760 --> 0:32:50.440
<v Speaker 1>we walk through the buyer bases earlier, they weren't one

0:32:50.480 --> 0:32:53.480
<v Speaker 1>of the buyers that I mentioned, right, and so that

0:32:53.640 --> 0:32:56.840
<v Speaker 1>puts more of an onus on those other buyer bases,

0:32:56.880 --> 0:32:59.040
<v Speaker 1>and some of them are stepping back for those reasons

0:32:59.040 --> 0:33:01.600
<v Speaker 1>we alluded to. Can we talk a little bit more

0:33:01.680 --> 0:33:05.640
<v Speaker 1>about speaking of a buyer stepping back? How do you

0:33:05.720 --> 0:33:09.880
<v Speaker 1>quantify the significant you know, so rate volatility is one

0:33:09.920 --> 0:33:14.160
<v Speaker 1>contributor to the widening spread between mortgages and treasuries, and

0:33:14.160 --> 0:33:16.040
<v Speaker 1>then the other one is, you know, the FED was

0:33:16.200 --> 0:33:18.440
<v Speaker 1>hoovering up a lot of nbs for a long time

0:33:18.520 --> 0:33:22.120
<v Speaker 1>and now it's not and it's going into quantitative tightening mode.

0:33:22.640 --> 0:33:25.760
<v Speaker 1>How do you quantify that or think about the effect

0:33:25.920 --> 0:33:30.120
<v Speaker 1>of the Fed's role in mortgage as so J back O,

0:33:30.600 --> 0:33:33.360
<v Speaker 1>who is our cohead of Securit Test Products research. He

0:33:33.480 --> 0:33:36.440
<v Speaker 1>runs our agency NBS research team. One of the things

0:33:36.520 --> 0:33:38.360
<v Speaker 1>that that he's done a great job of with respect

0:33:38.440 --> 0:33:41.400
<v Speaker 1>to when the FED has been involved, when the FED

0:33:41.440 --> 0:33:44.200
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been involved, is kind of looking at we talked

0:33:44.240 --> 0:33:47.560
<v Speaker 1>about this mortgage spread, kind of looking at how the

0:33:47.560 --> 0:33:51.480
<v Speaker 1>mortgage basis has moved or what level it's existed at

0:33:51.720 --> 0:33:54.440
<v Speaker 1>depending on the behavior of the FED over time. Right,

0:33:54.440 --> 0:33:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Because when the FED is buying, when you have this

0:33:56.360 --> 0:33:59.960
<v Speaker 1>large buyer stepping into the market, like that spread show

0:34:00.320 --> 0:34:02.200
<v Speaker 1>be tighter. You have a lot of this demand there.

0:34:02.200 --> 0:34:05.000
<v Speaker 1>When they're not buying, that spread should be wider, right,

0:34:05.000 --> 0:34:07.560
<v Speaker 1>And so that's that's definitely something that we keep in

0:34:07.600 --> 0:34:10.080
<v Speaker 1>mind in terms of thinking about what that mortgage spread

0:34:10.120 --> 0:34:14.520
<v Speaker 1>has looked like over time and accounting for what the

0:34:14.520 --> 0:34:17.120
<v Speaker 1>FET is doing at different points in time. So I

0:34:17.160 --> 0:34:20.800
<v Speaker 1>have a slightly weird question just going back to supply,

0:34:21.040 --> 0:34:24.239
<v Speaker 1>but I bought a very old house this year which

0:34:24.360 --> 0:34:27.600
<v Speaker 1>just had one of those like energy efficiency things done

0:34:27.600 --> 0:34:29.920
<v Speaker 1>on it, and we got like the lowest score possible

0:34:30.280 --> 0:34:35.960
<v Speaker 1>because there's absolutely no insulation. How much do technological advances

0:34:36.320 --> 0:34:41.360
<v Speaker 1>in housing like potentially drive supply? Like I'm thinking you know,

0:34:41.440 --> 0:34:44.440
<v Speaker 1>if everyone decides, O, energy prices are so high, I

0:34:44.520 --> 0:34:47.799
<v Speaker 1>want a really energy efficient house with solar panels on

0:34:47.840 --> 0:34:50.279
<v Speaker 1>it and that sort of thing. Could that drive like

0:34:50.320 --> 0:34:53.440
<v Speaker 1>a new round of activity. Congratulations on the home parks,

0:34:53.760 --> 0:34:57.440
<v Speaker 1>thank you as I watch heating oil prices go up

0:34:57.480 --> 0:35:00.399
<v Speaker 1>from starting to doubt myself but fix. But I would

0:35:00.440 --> 0:35:04.239
<v Speaker 1>view it less as a desire to trade up for

0:35:04.320 --> 0:35:08.040
<v Speaker 1>a more energy efficient home, if you will, especially given

0:35:08.040 --> 0:35:10.359
<v Speaker 1>what's happened at home prices and mortgage rates right now,

0:35:10.800 --> 0:35:14.319
<v Speaker 1>and perhaps more of a willingness of that homeowner too.

0:35:15.480 --> 0:35:17.479
<v Speaker 1>Maybe remove some of the equity, like we talked about

0:35:17.560 --> 0:35:19.080
<v Speaker 1>from that from that home, there's a lot of that

0:35:19.120 --> 0:35:22.960
<v Speaker 1>equity there, and perhaps spend that on their current house

0:35:23.000 --> 0:35:25.879
<v Speaker 1>to kind of improve the efficiency that you just sort

0:35:25.880 --> 0:35:30.040
<v Speaker 1>of anticipated. My question, could the lock in environment where

0:35:30.040 --> 0:35:32.160
<v Speaker 1>it just like I and you see people talk about

0:35:32.200 --> 0:35:34.120
<v Speaker 1>this all the time. It's like I can't move anywhere

0:35:34.120 --> 0:35:35.680
<v Speaker 1>because I don't want to give up my mortgage and

0:35:35.840 --> 0:35:42.000
<v Speaker 1>markets terrible. Could that sustain renovation activity? And because I

0:35:42.040 --> 0:35:45.120
<v Speaker 1>think renovation activity also really kicked into a high gear

0:35:45.480 --> 0:35:47.600
<v Speaker 1>during the pandemic and everyone was stuck at home, is

0:35:47.640 --> 0:35:50.080
<v Speaker 1>like I gotta like you know, fix my whatever so

0:35:50.239 --> 0:35:52.319
<v Speaker 1>that I living my home lot more. But could that

0:35:52.440 --> 0:35:54.960
<v Speaker 1>lock in have that same effect? That is certainly an

0:35:54.960 --> 0:35:57.600
<v Speaker 1>option that could happen. Right now, do you think about

0:35:58.160 --> 0:36:01.000
<v Speaker 1>how we typically talk about, oh, this is a entry

0:36:01.080 --> 0:36:03.160
<v Speaker 1>level home and then you have your move up home buyer,

0:36:03.320 --> 0:36:06.719
<v Speaker 1>and if we've made it much more difficult to kind

0:36:06.760 --> 0:36:10.600
<v Speaker 1>of progress along that path, then you're kind of looking

0:36:10.600 --> 0:36:13.120
<v Speaker 1>at your current house and saying, well, what do I

0:36:13.120 --> 0:36:14.600
<v Speaker 1>need to do to this house to make it more

0:36:15.480 --> 0:36:18.560
<v Speaker 1>accommodative of how my lifestyle is going to evolve, how

0:36:18.600 --> 0:36:22.120
<v Speaker 1>my family might be evolving, how my trends and work

0:36:22.160 --> 0:36:26.160
<v Speaker 1>from home might be evolving, you know. So speaking staying

0:36:26.160 --> 0:36:29.480
<v Speaker 1>on this supply and demand question, can you talk a

0:36:29.520 --> 0:36:32.320
<v Speaker 1>little bit about and we were talking about the boomers earlier,

0:36:32.320 --> 0:36:34.080
<v Speaker 1>but you say, you know, there's a lot of interest

0:36:34.160 --> 0:36:37.160
<v Speaker 1>in millennial home buyers or maybe Gen Z homebuyers. What

0:36:37.280 --> 0:36:41.920
<v Speaker 1>is household formation? What is the process that drives household formation?

0:36:42.000 --> 0:36:44.560
<v Speaker 1>And my understanding is I think it's spiked quite a bit,

0:36:45.040 --> 0:36:46.640
<v Speaker 1>but I don't, you know, it's not I don't have

0:36:46.680 --> 0:36:48.640
<v Speaker 1>a sense of what it actually is or why it

0:36:48.680 --> 0:36:51.880
<v Speaker 1>would spike due to COVID, But what is household formation,

0:36:52.320 --> 0:36:55.680
<v Speaker 1>what drives it, and how is the change and that

0:36:56.239 --> 0:36:59.279
<v Speaker 1>going to affect the market going forward? Absolutely. So when

0:36:59.280 --> 0:37:01.319
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned the or pillars at the top, one of

0:37:01.320 --> 0:37:03.719
<v Speaker 1>them was demand. And when I say demand in this context,

0:37:03.800 --> 0:37:06.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean household formations. Okay, that is the metric we're

0:37:06.080 --> 0:37:08.359
<v Speaker 1>looking at. So to talk about household formations, let's talk

0:37:08.400 --> 0:37:10.839
<v Speaker 1>about how we define a household would be great if

0:37:10.840 --> 0:37:15.240
<v Speaker 1>you will, right, and so basically, a household is a

0:37:15.239 --> 0:37:17.040
<v Speaker 1>a unit living together in a in a shelter. It

0:37:17.040 --> 0:37:19.759
<v Speaker 1>can be ownership or rentship. I like to use an

0:37:19.760 --> 0:37:23.319
<v Speaker 1>example where you basically have four people that just kind

0:37:23.360 --> 0:37:26.480
<v Speaker 1>of maybe they graduated from college, they moved to let's

0:37:26.480 --> 0:37:28.440
<v Speaker 1>say New York City where we're sitting right now, right

0:37:28.640 --> 0:37:31.800
<v Speaker 1>and they live in one apartment. They are one household

0:37:32.400 --> 0:37:34.840
<v Speaker 1>when they moved, when they graduated, when they moved to

0:37:34.840 --> 0:37:36.720
<v Speaker 1>the city, that that was a formation of a household

0:37:36.719 --> 0:37:38.920
<v Speaker 1>because as part of their parents household before that, they

0:37:38.920 --> 0:37:40.960
<v Speaker 1>didn't count as one. So you have one household formation.

0:37:42.000 --> 0:37:44.160
<v Speaker 1>What we're really going to be talking about his headship rights.

0:37:44.560 --> 0:37:49.160
<v Speaker 1>That's the percentage of any group, cohort of the population.

0:37:49.239 --> 0:37:50.880
<v Speaker 1>How you choose to define it, we're defining it by

0:37:50.920 --> 0:37:53.080
<v Speaker 1>age here that heads their own household. So this this

0:37:53.160 --> 0:37:56.120
<v Speaker 1>group of people, their headship rates four of them in

0:37:56.160 --> 0:37:58.880
<v Speaker 1>one household. Two years later they all moved into their

0:37:58.880 --> 0:38:03.759
<v Speaker 1>own apartment. We now have four households. Formation would be three.

0:38:03.840 --> 0:38:05.640
<v Speaker 1>We went from one to four. It's a net figure,

0:38:06.440 --> 0:38:08.920
<v Speaker 1>and the headship rate for this very small cohort is

0:38:08.920 --> 0:38:12.920
<v Speaker 1>ad So when we think about how household formations are

0:38:12.920 --> 0:38:15.560
<v Speaker 1>going to evolve, we're looking at how those headship rates evolved,

0:38:15.800 --> 0:38:18.720
<v Speaker 1>in particular by age. The steepest part of that slope

0:38:18.719 --> 0:38:21.000
<v Speaker 1>is as people move through their twenties and early thirties,

0:38:21.320 --> 0:38:24.719
<v Speaker 1>kind of branching out on their own, starting with a

0:38:24.719 --> 0:38:28.600
<v Speaker 1>heavier roommate environment towards a lesser roommate environment in general.

0:38:29.120 --> 0:38:32.440
<v Speaker 1>And that's why there's so much focus on millennials and

0:38:32.520 --> 0:38:37.200
<v Speaker 1>gen Zsa. You mentioned how much we've seen recently the

0:38:37.239 --> 0:38:42.439
<v Speaker 1>headship rate, the percentage of people in there four, their

0:38:42.440 --> 0:38:46.120
<v Speaker 1>head ship rate was close to fifty year lows, and

0:38:46.120 --> 0:38:48.080
<v Speaker 1>that's for a number of reasons. Did we hear a

0:38:48.080 --> 0:38:50.319
<v Speaker 1>lot of discussion about things like student loan debt, the

0:38:50.360 --> 0:38:52.640
<v Speaker 1>fact that a lot of these this generation graduated into

0:38:52.640 --> 0:38:54.840
<v Speaker 1>a recession, making it a little bit more difficult to

0:38:54.960 --> 0:38:58.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of form your own household, like those kinds of

0:38:58.200 --> 0:39:01.719
<v Speaker 1>taking on excess roommates moving into your parents basements. That

0:39:01.719 --> 0:39:03.600
<v Speaker 1>that brought them down to fifty year loss. But household

0:39:03.600 --> 0:39:06.319
<v Speaker 1>formations were still coming in above long run average because

0:39:06.360 --> 0:39:09.680
<v Speaker 1>you had such a large group of people moving through

0:39:09.680 --> 0:39:13.800
<v Speaker 1>the age cohorts that were so important for household formations.

0:39:13.800 --> 0:39:15.640
<v Speaker 1>So the rate at which they were the forming were lower,

0:39:15.680 --> 0:39:18.360
<v Speaker 1>but the number of people so helpful. This is like

0:39:18.400 --> 0:39:20.839
<v Speaker 1>answering questions have been too embarrassed to ask for years.

0:39:20.960 --> 0:39:23.160
<v Speaker 1>This is is exactly why. So then what happened in

0:39:23.960 --> 0:39:26.680
<v Speaker 1>that caused So I think that you had a couple

0:39:26.680 --> 0:39:29.879
<v Speaker 1>of dynamics that we're playing out in one that helped

0:39:29.920 --> 0:39:34.440
<v Speaker 1>cause the spike. I think A you had the pandemic,

0:39:34.960 --> 0:39:38.000
<v Speaker 1>which two reasons you had a kind of risk aversion

0:39:38.360 --> 0:39:40.920
<v Speaker 1>people not wanting to live in such densely populated areas

0:39:40.960 --> 0:39:43.279
<v Speaker 1>where in a lot of instances you kind of might

0:39:43.400 --> 0:39:44.880
<v Speaker 1>more likely to have roomates. They want to live in

0:39:44.960 --> 0:39:47.960
<v Speaker 1>less densely populated areas, more likely to have single family housing.

0:39:48.239 --> 0:39:52.040
<v Speaker 1>We tracked home prices by zip code, population density, the

0:39:52.080 --> 0:39:55.520
<v Speaker 1>gap between suburbs and less densely populated urban areas versus

0:39:55.560 --> 0:39:58.200
<v Speaker 1>densely populated urban areas gapped out over the course of

0:39:59.719 --> 0:40:02.640
<v Speaker 1>to the largest we'd ever seen. And again that data

0:40:02.680 --> 0:40:06.480
<v Speaker 1>goes back late eighties or ninies, but so risk aversion

0:40:06.640 --> 0:40:09.680
<v Speaker 1>work from home allowed them to make that move. And

0:40:09.719 --> 0:40:12.880
<v Speaker 1>then we've talked a lot about mortgage rates. As mortgage

0:40:12.920 --> 0:40:14.920
<v Speaker 1>rates were falling to all time lows, the buying power

0:40:15.239 --> 0:40:18.400
<v Speaker 1>of this cohort is now much more substantial, and so

0:40:18.800 --> 0:40:21.319
<v Speaker 1>that kind of just exaggerates their ability to kind of

0:40:21.360 --> 0:40:24.000
<v Speaker 1>to drive home prices up there and to afford buying

0:40:24.040 --> 0:40:26.840
<v Speaker 1>homes before we had this record growth in home prices

0:40:27.600 --> 0:40:32.320
<v Speaker 1>at the same time leaving these densely populated areas, rents

0:40:32.400 --> 0:40:36.040
<v Speaker 1>coming down. That also enabled people who weren't necessarily making

0:40:36.040 --> 0:40:39.720
<v Speaker 1>that move out to kind of decrease their roommate counts.

0:40:40.000 --> 0:40:42.200
<v Speaker 1>And so you had household formations from that perspective in

0:40:42.239 --> 0:40:43.879
<v Speaker 1>terms of going from two or three roommates to living

0:40:43.880 --> 0:40:46.880
<v Speaker 1>by yourself, and informations from going from a renter in

0:40:47.120 --> 0:40:50.680
<v Speaker 1>a roommated situation in a densely populated area to kind

0:40:50.680 --> 0:40:52.520
<v Speaker 1>of the less densely populated areas. So that took us

0:40:52.520 --> 0:40:55.080
<v Speaker 1>from above long run average to well above long run average, Tracy,

0:40:55.080 --> 0:40:57.040
<v Speaker 1>I had totally forgotten that was such a big story.

0:40:57.120 --> 0:40:59.399
<v Speaker 1>The suburbs verse the city is that was like such

0:40:59.400 --> 0:41:02.239
<v Speaker 1>a big thing. Yeah, I think a number of people

0:41:02.280 --> 0:41:04.359
<v Speaker 1>have moved back into the city now, not me though

0:41:04.840 --> 0:41:07.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm in the country, um sort of. Anyway, you mentioned

0:41:07.719 --> 0:41:12.280
<v Speaker 1>millennials there, and we've been talking a lot about housing affordability,

0:41:12.360 --> 0:41:14.920
<v Speaker 1>and there has been this discussion about whether or not,

0:41:15.200 --> 0:41:18.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, people that have massive student debt might have

0:41:18.640 --> 0:41:21.239
<v Speaker 1>difficulty saving in the current environment, whether or not they'll

0:41:21.239 --> 0:41:23.879
<v Speaker 1>be able to afford houses in the future. There's also

0:41:24.360 --> 0:41:26.600
<v Speaker 1>a thing that crops up every once in a while

0:41:26.640 --> 0:41:28.560
<v Speaker 1>where people talk about, well, maybe a lot of younger

0:41:28.600 --> 0:41:31.520
<v Speaker 1>people don't want to own home simply because they might

0:41:31.560 --> 0:41:34.000
<v Speaker 1>be into you know, apartments that come with lots of

0:41:34.040 --> 0:41:37.719
<v Speaker 1>amenities like pools and movie rooms and things like that.

0:41:38.320 --> 0:41:42.960
<v Speaker 1>What's your impression of, I guess, the American dream or

0:41:43.000 --> 0:41:46.600
<v Speaker 1>the viability of the American dream at the moment. Do

0:41:46.719 --> 0:41:51.200
<v Speaker 1>people still want to own houses? As you know, affordability

0:41:51.280 --> 0:41:54.480
<v Speaker 1>really comes into question anytime we've seen kind of like

0:41:54.520 --> 0:41:58.680
<v Speaker 1>the the softer almost survey based data, it still points

0:41:58.719 --> 0:42:03.560
<v Speaker 1>towards people wanting to own homes. I do think that

0:42:03.760 --> 0:42:07.799
<v Speaker 1>affordability pressures that credit availability like, Yes, we think it's

0:42:08.280 --> 0:42:11.480
<v Speaker 1>probably moving tighter in the in the short term, But

0:42:12.200 --> 0:42:14.000
<v Speaker 1>even if it starts to move wider, some of the

0:42:14.000 --> 0:42:16.680
<v Speaker 1>regulations have been put into place post the GFC make

0:42:16.719 --> 0:42:20.399
<v Speaker 1>it unlikely that we're going to see lending standards ease

0:42:20.440 --> 0:42:22.960
<v Speaker 1>to anywhere close to what we saw in two thousand seven.

0:42:24.040 --> 0:42:26.080
<v Speaker 1>I say that to imply that right now the home

0:42:26.120 --> 0:42:28.480
<v Speaker 1>ownership break is between sixty five and sixties six percent.

0:42:28.920 --> 0:42:32.359
<v Speaker 1>We don't see it going back to like we saw

0:42:32.480 --> 0:42:34.960
<v Speaker 1>back in the early two thousand's. We do think that

0:42:35.000 --> 0:42:39.200
<v Speaker 1>there's still a desire to own homes, the step towards

0:42:39.239 --> 0:42:42.880
<v Speaker 1>owning homes occurring a little bit later in people's lives.

0:42:43.320 --> 0:42:47.520
<v Speaker 1>But we also think that single family rentorship, which I

0:42:47.520 --> 0:42:50.399
<v Speaker 1>think has become a much more talked about topic over

0:42:50.400 --> 0:42:52.040
<v Speaker 1>the course of the past ten of fifteen years, and

0:42:52.120 --> 0:42:55.520
<v Speaker 1>largely due to the institutional ownership of those homes. Um

0:42:55.719 --> 0:42:57.719
<v Speaker 1>we think that that's going to become, or we think

0:42:57.760 --> 0:43:00.759
<v Speaker 1>it always has been and will continue to be, kind

0:43:00.760 --> 0:43:04.720
<v Speaker 1>of another pillar of of housing of shelter in this country.

0:43:04.920 --> 0:43:07.279
<v Speaker 1>So we talked a little bit about your forecast for

0:43:07.360 --> 0:43:12.240
<v Speaker 1>next year, which is the minus three decline in home prices.

0:43:12.239 --> 0:43:16.880
<v Speaker 1>What's the variable that you are most closely watching that

0:43:17.080 --> 0:43:22.920
<v Speaker 1>could change that outlook? Supply? We are watching inventories, if supply,

0:43:23.120 --> 0:43:27.120
<v Speaker 1>if uneconomic sellers come from areas that we're not expecting.

0:43:27.280 --> 0:43:31.359
<v Speaker 1>If supply increases faster than we think it will, then

0:43:31.400 --> 0:43:33.560
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, the likelihood that you have people

0:43:33.560 --> 0:43:35.960
<v Speaker 1>willing to sell into what we already think will be

0:43:35.960 --> 0:43:40.399
<v Speaker 1>a meager demand environment increases, and that likelihood would then

0:43:40.640 --> 0:43:43.840
<v Speaker 1>bring home prices lower. So that's the number one variable

0:43:43.840 --> 0:43:46.319
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at all right. Well, Jim Egan, it was

0:43:46.400 --> 0:43:48.439
<v Speaker 1>lovely having you on all thoughts. Thank you so much

0:43:48.440 --> 0:43:51.600
<v Speaker 1>for taking the time to walk us through household formations

0:43:51.719 --> 0:43:56.239
<v Speaker 1>and mortgage as I asked about like five questions that

0:43:56.360 --> 0:43:58.440
<v Speaker 1>I was like to embarrassed to ask for, like you know,

0:43:58.480 --> 0:44:00.919
<v Speaker 1>over the last ten years. So I've ship you coming

0:44:00.960 --> 0:44:04.480
<v Speaker 1>out and answering them clarifying. I actually I feel like

0:44:04.520 --> 0:44:07.160
<v Speaker 1>I understand the few things. Thank you for having me on.

0:44:07.239 --> 0:44:24.520
<v Speaker 1>It was a lot of them. Yeah, that was great, well, Joe,

0:44:24.600 --> 0:44:27.279
<v Speaker 1>I thought that was fascinating just to sort of like

0:44:27.480 --> 0:44:31.160
<v Speaker 1>really lay out how unusual this current moment is and

0:44:31.200 --> 0:44:33.520
<v Speaker 1>how we're sort of like breaking records on a lot

0:44:33.560 --> 0:44:37.760
<v Speaker 1>of housing market indicators or you know, like structural rates

0:44:37.760 --> 0:44:39.960
<v Speaker 1>and things like that. The other thing that stood out

0:44:39.960 --> 0:44:43.040
<v Speaker 1>to me was just that lock in Yes. Well, you know,

0:44:43.200 --> 0:44:45.960
<v Speaker 1>it's funny like University of Michigan, I think in their

0:44:46.040 --> 0:44:49.080
<v Speaker 1>economic Sentiment, they asked these questions like is it a

0:44:49.120 --> 0:44:51.359
<v Speaker 1>good time to buy? Or is it a good time?

0:44:51.719 --> 0:44:54.440
<v Speaker 1>And these people say these days they say no. And

0:44:54.480 --> 0:44:56.200
<v Speaker 1>then the other question they say, is this a good

0:44:56.239 --> 0:44:59.120
<v Speaker 1>time to sell? And that was really high up until

0:44:59.160 --> 0:45:01.960
<v Speaker 1>recently because it's like a seller's market, but that's plunged.

0:45:02.160 --> 0:45:04.680
<v Speaker 1>So we have a very weird situation in which it's

0:45:04.680 --> 0:45:07.360
<v Speaker 1>a it's a it's neither a seller's market nor a

0:45:07.360 --> 0:45:09.880
<v Speaker 1>buyer's market, which means we're just going to get this

0:45:10.080 --> 0:45:14.120
<v Speaker 1>like freeze where there's just not much transactions. And look,

0:45:14.120 --> 0:45:15.759
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what's gonna happen with prices, but I

0:45:15.800 --> 0:45:20.279
<v Speaker 1>find this idea compelling that if if supply doesn't shoot up,

0:45:20.800 --> 0:45:22.759
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to get a big drop in prices. Yeah.

0:45:22.800 --> 0:45:25.680
<v Speaker 1>I think that kind of goes to Jim's final point

0:45:25.719 --> 0:45:27.719
<v Speaker 1>as well about it's sort of all about supply and

0:45:27.760 --> 0:45:30.800
<v Speaker 1>inventory at the moment. The other thing that I found interesting,

0:45:30.880 --> 0:45:33.000
<v Speaker 1>and this has come up in a number of conversations

0:45:33.000 --> 0:45:35.840
<v Speaker 1>at this point, is the idea of the marginal buyer

0:45:36.120 --> 0:45:38.320
<v Speaker 1>of a lot of bonds. So in this case, mortgage

0:45:38.360 --> 0:45:41.160
<v Speaker 1>bonds just not being there anymore. And it's sort of

0:45:41.200 --> 0:45:45.000
<v Speaker 1>a similar story for for treasuries too. But when it

0:45:45.040 --> 0:45:48.759
<v Speaker 1>comes to mbs, that's feeding into the rates, right, and

0:45:48.840 --> 0:45:51.400
<v Speaker 1>so you can sort of almost draw a direct line

0:45:51.440 --> 0:45:57.200
<v Speaker 1>between higher capital requirements and standards to the massive shooting

0:45:57.280 --> 0:45:59.239
<v Speaker 1>up of mortgage rates that we've seen well, you know,

0:45:59.320 --> 0:46:02.160
<v Speaker 1>and to the extend that mbs are a sort of

0:46:02.360 --> 0:46:05.680
<v Speaker 1>bet on low volatility. You know, the FED doesn't care

0:46:05.719 --> 0:46:08.640
<v Speaker 1>about you know, the feed is not a profit seeking entity,

0:46:09.040 --> 0:46:11.200
<v Speaker 1>I guess it technically, I don't know. Maybe for political

0:46:11.280 --> 0:46:13.960
<v Speaker 1>reasons wants to have some money to remit to the treasury,

0:46:13.960 --> 0:46:16.799
<v Speaker 1>but that's not why the fit exists. And so it

0:46:16.840 --> 0:46:22.719
<v Speaker 1>could absorb that volatility, whereas when it's in quantity, that

0:46:22.880 --> 0:46:26.240
<v Speaker 1>is that is a that volatility has to be priced.

0:46:26.280 --> 0:46:28.400
<v Speaker 1>And so you see that spread and it's really wild

0:46:28.440 --> 0:46:31.200
<v Speaker 1>because so you just look at the spread of thirty

0:46:31.239 --> 0:46:35.200
<v Speaker 1>your mortgages versus treasuries, and it's quickly spiked up to

0:46:35.200 --> 0:46:38.040
<v Speaker 1>where we saw like March, when the entire financial system

0:46:38.120 --> 0:46:40.680
<v Speaker 1>like briefly when nuts. We're gonna have to put together

0:46:40.760 --> 0:46:42.960
<v Speaker 1>some of these charts. I think, yeah, let's make a

0:46:43.040 --> 0:46:46.480
<v Speaker 1>chart list. A a charticle should go along with this episode.

0:46:46.680 --> 0:46:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Shall we leave it there? Let's leave it there? Okay,

0:46:48.760 --> 0:46:51.440
<v Speaker 1>This has been another episode of the All Thoughts podcast

0:46:51.520 --> 0:46:53.960
<v Speaker 1>on Tracy Halloway. You can follow me on Twitter at

0:46:54.000 --> 0:46:56.720
<v Speaker 1>Tracy Halloway and I'm Joe Isn't though. You can follow

0:46:56.719 --> 0:47:00.520
<v Speaker 1>me on Twitter at the Stalwart, follow our producer on Twitter,

0:47:00.640 --> 0:47:04.799
<v Speaker 1>Dash Bennett He's at dashbot. And Carmen Rodriguez She's at

0:47:04.880 --> 0:47:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Carmen Armann. And check out all of our podcasts at

0:47:07.400 --> 0:47:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg under the handle at podcasts. Thanks for listening,