WEBVTT - Kickoff - Year 26

0:00:01.160 --> 0:00:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly, a production of I Heart Radio.

0:00:06.800 --> 0:00:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Time now for Fantasy Football Weekly from I Heart Radio,

0:00:10.880 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>your weekly source for the nation's best fantasy speculation and advice.

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Now along with the guys from fanball dot com. Here's

0:00:18.680 --> 0:00:24.440
<v Speaker 1>the host for Fantasy Football Weekly, Paul. It is your

0:00:24.520 --> 0:00:29.400
<v Speaker 1>number twenty six of Fantasy Football Weekly. We are America's

0:00:29.440 --> 0:00:32.320
<v Speaker 1>longest running fantasy show, and for good reason, because we've

0:00:32.400 --> 0:00:36.440
<v Speaker 1>been helping you dominate your fantasy league for over two

0:00:36.479 --> 0:00:41.320
<v Speaker 1>decades and we're old half to and half. That is

0:00:41.400 --> 0:00:44.360
<v Speaker 1>the voice of Brian Johnson from Guillotine Leagues dot com

0:00:44.360 --> 0:00:46.720
<v Speaker 1>on Paul Charchy from Guillotine League dot com, and Scott

0:00:46.760 --> 0:00:51.400
<v Speaker 1>fish widely known for Scott Fishball. I Scott, my my

0:00:51.440 --> 0:00:53.600
<v Speaker 1>team in your league just got blown up by Damian Williams.

0:00:53.800 --> 0:00:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah as well, but it was like an eleventh th rounder,

0:00:56.560 --> 0:00:58.800
<v Speaker 1>so I didn't feel so bad. But I wasn't online

0:00:58.880 --> 0:01:01.840
<v Speaker 1>yesterday what happened. Uh, yeah, that's gonna be a problem.

0:01:01.920 --> 0:01:05.520
<v Speaker 1>We will get right into the significance of Damian Williams

0:01:05.640 --> 0:01:07.800
<v Speaker 1>in just a minute, but lots of other stuff to

0:01:07.840 --> 0:01:10.319
<v Speaker 1>go through over the course of the show, including all

0:01:10.400 --> 0:01:14.800
<v Speaker 1>the off season moves that the notable, meaningful, fantasy relevant

0:01:14.840 --> 0:01:18.120
<v Speaker 1>offseason moves for In case you know you're reasonably were

0:01:18.160 --> 0:01:20.840
<v Speaker 1>sleeping for the last seven months, and I wouldn't blame you.

0:01:21.080 --> 0:01:24.560
<v Speaker 1>You've plenty of time to block block out everything that's

0:01:24.560 --> 0:01:27.800
<v Speaker 1>happened lately. We'll go through the training camp battles that

0:01:27.880 --> 0:01:32.000
<v Speaker 1>we will be watching this spring. We will hit you

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:35.800
<v Speaker 1>up with a Dynasty Empire Rookie draft. A DP will

0:01:35.840 --> 0:01:38.080
<v Speaker 1>look at all the rookies where they're going in Dynasty

0:01:38.080 --> 0:01:41.200
<v Speaker 1>and Empire drafts, talk about the rookies individually, and also

0:01:41.840 --> 0:01:45.800
<v Speaker 1>figure out whether or not America's got it right. Is

0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:47.720
<v Speaker 1>this the right guys in the right place. Guys are

0:01:47.760 --> 0:01:49.720
<v Speaker 1>going too high? Too low? We'll tell you that as well.

0:01:49.800 --> 0:01:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Not America, the world, the world it has intergalactic even

0:01:55.240 --> 0:01:59.880
<v Speaker 1>probably three tough questions as always, and the COVID plans

0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:04.559
<v Speaker 1>that you need to get in place pronto before friendships

0:02:04.600 --> 0:02:09.120
<v Speaker 1>are ended and it will happen. YEA. All right, guys,

0:02:09.360 --> 0:02:12.760
<v Speaker 1>let's jump right in. Let's begin here with the news

0:02:12.760 --> 0:02:16.280
<v Speaker 1>that Damian Williams has opted out. This means that Clyde

0:02:16.400 --> 0:02:19.240
<v Speaker 1>Edwards Hilaire, who I think we were all intrigued by

0:02:19.320 --> 0:02:23.400
<v Speaker 1>before becomes absolutely fascinating with the upside that he can

0:02:23.400 --> 0:02:25.880
<v Speaker 1>bring to a fantasy team. The way I've asked you

0:02:25.880 --> 0:02:30.560
<v Speaker 1>guys to work on this is this way, Scott, give

0:02:30.680 --> 0:02:35.240
<v Speaker 1>me the best case scenario for Clyde Edwards Laire in

0:02:35.360 --> 0:02:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City, and then Brian after he's done, I want

0:02:38.440 --> 0:02:41.480
<v Speaker 1>you to give me the worst case scenario. Reasonable ones.

0:02:41.800 --> 0:02:44.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to hear about a shattered femur or

0:02:44.360 --> 0:02:47.000
<v Speaker 1>anything like that. You don't want here are one for me.

0:02:47.520 --> 0:02:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't play right exactly with the time of research of

0:02:52.760 --> 0:02:58.919
<v Speaker 1>cly I've gone back to multiple doctors, school, nurse, everything.

0:02:58.919 --> 0:03:00.320
<v Speaker 1>But all right, fine, I won't do that. All right,

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:02.840
<v Speaker 1>thank you, Scott. We begin with you, Clyde Edwards Hilaire.

0:03:02.880 --> 0:03:05.639
<v Speaker 1>What's the reasonable upside that he could bring a things

0:03:05.680 --> 0:03:07.839
<v Speaker 1>break right for him in Kansas City. It's really we've

0:03:07.840 --> 0:03:10.600
<v Speaker 1>seen it right like we saw we saw Spencer where

0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:14.360
<v Speaker 1>uh Ters a c l and Kareem Hunt came in

0:03:14.400 --> 0:03:16.760
<v Speaker 1>and he was a top you know, five six running

0:03:16.760 --> 0:03:19.560
<v Speaker 1>back with Andy Reid and and Alex Smith, had a

0:03:19.600 --> 0:03:22.919
<v Speaker 1>pro bowld base. He was an m v P quarterback

0:03:22.960 --> 0:03:25.240
<v Speaker 1>for a while that year. It's not like uh it's

0:03:25.240 --> 0:03:27.560
<v Speaker 1>not like he was terrible that year. We we've seen that.

0:03:27.600 --> 0:03:30.120
<v Speaker 1>We've seen Damian Williams with a five game stretch of

0:03:30.960 --> 0:03:33.280
<v Speaker 1>ninety plus yards in almost all of them and five

0:03:33.320 --> 0:03:35.400
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns at the end of a couple of years ago

0:03:35.480 --> 0:03:38.960
<v Speaker 1>there in. That's his upside. His upside is that twelve

0:03:39.000 --> 0:03:43.800
<v Speaker 1>to total yard back with double digit touchdowns. That's he's

0:03:43.960 --> 0:03:47.920
<v Speaker 1>now basically a first round running back. He's I I

0:03:48.000 --> 0:03:50.400
<v Speaker 1>can't see any argument putting him outside the top ten.

0:03:50.600 --> 0:03:53.360
<v Speaker 1>Let's get more granular than just first round, because I

0:03:53.360 --> 0:03:55.120
<v Speaker 1>think he's going to go in the first round. I

0:03:55.120 --> 0:03:58.360
<v Speaker 1>have missed my rby six right now, rby six should

0:03:58.400 --> 0:04:04.040
<v Speaker 1>that would put him roughly pay you know eight, maybe

0:04:04.040 --> 0:04:06.840
<v Speaker 1>even six if you're that's your strategy this year. You know,

0:04:06.920 --> 0:04:09.760
<v Speaker 1>auction value, where would you peg him a Clyde Edwards

0:04:09.800 --> 0:04:14.360
<v Speaker 1>a layer for for uh? For the maximum auction value

0:04:14.760 --> 0:04:16.359
<v Speaker 1>that you I'm a tough guy to ask on this

0:04:16.400 --> 0:04:19.400
<v Speaker 1>because I am such a thrifty auction right, I like

0:04:19.520 --> 0:04:22.640
<v Speaker 1>just hammering the middle of the road, guys. So uh,

0:04:23.040 --> 0:04:25.800
<v Speaker 1>probably in that you know, high twenties range. That's probably

0:04:25.800 --> 0:04:28.000
<v Speaker 1>about right if you want for a typical player that's

0:04:28.040 --> 0:04:30.960
<v Speaker 1>going in the middle end of the first round, Bryan,

0:04:31.240 --> 0:04:34.839
<v Speaker 1>give me the worst case, reasonable, worst case scenario, non

0:04:34.880 --> 0:04:37.800
<v Speaker 1>injury related for Clyde Edwards a layer. Okay, well, I

0:04:37.800 --> 0:04:40.240
<v Speaker 1>think it would be safe to say before Williams opted out,

0:04:40.320 --> 0:04:42.880
<v Speaker 1>we were looking at a fifty fifty time share between

0:04:43.440 --> 0:04:46.640
<v Speaker 1>c H and Williams whoever, whoever. The starter doesn't matter.

0:04:47.440 --> 0:04:50.440
<v Speaker 1>Now we're probably looking so DeAndre Washington and now the backup,

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:53.080
<v Speaker 1>of course, we're looking I think still at a sixty

0:04:53.200 --> 0:04:56.520
<v Speaker 1>forty time share where c H is the lead runner,

0:04:56.720 --> 0:04:59.000
<v Speaker 1>but it's not gonna be He's not getting all the

0:04:59.000 --> 0:05:01.600
<v Speaker 1>work now that Williams is it out. DeAndre Washington is

0:05:01.600 --> 0:05:04.440
<v Speaker 1>a very capable runner in the worst case scenario is

0:05:04.560 --> 0:05:07.520
<v Speaker 1>it becomes a fifty fifty platoon. I didn't realize this,

0:05:07.600 --> 0:05:10.920
<v Speaker 1>but DeAndre Washington was a college teammate of Patrick two

0:05:11.720 --> 0:05:15.800
<v Speaker 1>two years of Texas Tech and then yeah, he wanted

0:05:16.040 --> 0:05:19.680
<v Speaker 1>to Signington caught forty one passes from the homes at

0:05:19.680 --> 0:05:22.320
<v Speaker 1>Texas Tech. DeAndre Washington picked up a lot of blitzes.

0:05:22.560 --> 0:05:24.719
<v Speaker 1>They probably took a lot of showers together. There's a

0:05:24.720 --> 0:05:27.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of bonding. What are you saying that's going on there?

0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:29.839
<v Speaker 1>And Washington's no slouch when he's got a chance to play,

0:05:30.080 --> 0:05:31.840
<v Speaker 1>he's been good. He's been with the Raiders. For those

0:05:31.880 --> 0:05:35.880
<v Speaker 1>who don't know, last week last year, I'm sorry, three

0:05:35.920 --> 0:05:38.800
<v Speaker 1>times he saw twenty touches in weeks thirteen, fifteen, and sixteen.

0:05:38.839 --> 0:05:41.920
<v Speaker 1>He finished as RB nine, RB twelve, and RB nineteen

0:05:41.960 --> 0:05:44.760
<v Speaker 1>in those weeks. I mean, right now, I've got him

0:05:44.760 --> 0:05:47.840
<v Speaker 1>around running back fifty with the Naheim Hines and the

0:05:47.920 --> 0:05:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Tavius Murray's of the world. And the worst case scenario

0:05:51.200 --> 0:05:53.000
<v Speaker 1>is he plays well, and I think he will, and

0:05:53.400 --> 0:05:56.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm downgrading all rookies. Still see Ages the prime rookie

0:05:56.839 --> 0:05:59.520
<v Speaker 1>out there now. But he's just not gonna get eighty

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:01.920
<v Speaker 1>to send. You're sent of the touches, which most most

0:06:01.960 --> 0:06:04.360
<v Speaker 1>people expect. That would be the worst case. So let's

0:06:04.400 --> 0:06:06.240
<v Speaker 1>more a split. Let's play. Let's play that out. Let's

0:06:06.240 --> 0:06:07.960
<v Speaker 1>assume that you're right and that split's going to be

0:06:07.960 --> 0:06:12.640
<v Speaker 1>closer to than in your scenario. What's the right draft

0:06:12.680 --> 0:06:16.400
<v Speaker 1>spot for Clyde Edwards Hilaire Almost where he was going,

0:06:16.720 --> 0:06:21.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe around sooner he's going around round three before Williams. Yeah,

0:06:21.520 --> 0:06:24.120
<v Speaker 1>still right around there, a little sooner, say mid to

0:06:24.200 --> 0:06:28.200
<v Speaker 1>late second. But first seems a little first, seems like

0:06:28.400 --> 0:06:29.960
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of reach for me and re draft

0:06:30.120 --> 0:06:32.680
<v Speaker 1>that's that's me. But I know people are doing and

0:06:32.839 --> 0:06:35.440
<v Speaker 1>I can see why. But Washington is not going to

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:38.560
<v Speaker 1>be a non factor. All right. So we've talked on

0:06:38.600 --> 0:06:41.479
<v Speaker 1>this show and especially the podcast version, and welcome to

0:06:41.520 --> 0:06:43.480
<v Speaker 1>everybody who's listening to us over the air on their

0:06:43.520 --> 0:06:46.640
<v Speaker 1>their favorite radio station. But we podcast all year round.

0:06:46.720 --> 0:06:49.920
<v Speaker 1>This is our first show of year, number twenty six

0:06:50.000 --> 0:06:54.000
<v Speaker 1>over the air. On the podcast, we talked about stacking

0:06:54.240 --> 0:06:58.000
<v Speaker 1>the two chiefs running backs in part because Damian Williams

0:06:58.000 --> 0:07:00.120
<v Speaker 1>was so cheap. You were going Clyde Edwards all are

0:07:00.120 --> 0:07:01.840
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the second or early third, and

0:07:01.920 --> 0:07:05.159
<v Speaker 1>then you're getting Damien Williams in round eight, around nine,

0:07:05.279 --> 0:07:07.720
<v Speaker 1>around ten, or in the case of the Scott fish ball,

0:07:07.720 --> 0:07:11.480
<v Speaker 1>around eleven. So, now, what's the real viability if you

0:07:11.520 --> 0:07:14.040
<v Speaker 1>want and is that? Is there any viability left in

0:07:14.200 --> 0:07:18.680
<v Speaker 1>using as you're starting running backs Dwayne Washington, who's gonna

0:07:18.720 --> 0:07:24.760
<v Speaker 1>go super late? Sorry, DeAndre Washington and Clyde Edwards A layer. Sure,

0:07:24.840 --> 0:07:27.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean you're like I just kind of said, you

0:07:27.160 --> 0:07:28.840
<v Speaker 1>might be paying a little more of a pre Well,

0:07:28.840 --> 0:07:30.320
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna pay more of a premium now for a

0:07:30.400 --> 0:07:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Layer in most cases. But that's the problem. On the

0:07:33.160 --> 0:07:37.240
<v Speaker 1>tail end, it becomes more of a it's almost you're

0:07:37.240 --> 0:07:40.080
<v Speaker 1>going all in or almost you're almost handcuffing. And when

0:07:40.120 --> 0:07:42.800
<v Speaker 1>it was Williams, it wasn't really a handcuff scenario, right,

0:07:43.160 --> 0:07:45.040
<v Speaker 1>So now it's almost more of a handcuff. So, long

0:07:45.040 --> 0:07:47.400
<v Speaker 1>story short, I'm an advocate for it. If I do

0:07:47.600 --> 0:07:50.240
<v Speaker 1>draft to Layer, I'm getting Washington though, no matter what,

0:07:50.360 --> 0:07:52.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm in this weird spot where I started out this

0:07:52.440 --> 0:07:56.600
<v Speaker 1>offseason going, let's handcuffed, because if someone gets COVID or something,

0:07:57.640 --> 0:07:59.600
<v Speaker 1>we want his backup. And now I'm like, they're in

0:07:59.640 --> 0:08:03.280
<v Speaker 1>the same room together all week, right if one of

0:08:03.280 --> 0:08:05.640
<v Speaker 1>those gets I don't know that. I think I want

0:08:05.640 --> 0:08:09.480
<v Speaker 1>to spread out my my who I have in my

0:08:09.560 --> 0:08:13.680
<v Speaker 1>running back corps. I liked the tandem of Clyde Edwards

0:08:13.760 --> 0:08:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Layer and Damien Williams because of the price you had

0:08:16.080 --> 0:08:18.920
<v Speaker 1>to pay for them each, which was early third round

0:08:19.000 --> 0:08:21.840
<v Speaker 1>and say the ninth round. But now that Clyde Edwards

0:08:21.960 --> 0:08:23.880
<v Speaker 1>Laire is going to cost me a late first rounder

0:08:23.880 --> 0:08:26.680
<v Speaker 1>in all probability to get I'm out, who do you

0:08:26.720 --> 0:08:29.360
<v Speaker 1>want who would you rather take more based on their ADP.

0:08:29.480 --> 0:08:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Of course Washington, Washington, because you know he's just you know,

0:08:34.080 --> 0:08:36.319
<v Speaker 1>it's because somebody is going to take Clyde Edwards a

0:08:36.360 --> 0:08:38.600
<v Speaker 1>layer in the first round. I can't. I don't think

0:08:38.600 --> 0:08:40.600
<v Speaker 1>he's going to get out of first round. And if

0:08:40.600 --> 0:08:43.080
<v Speaker 1>you pay that price, you're paying it with the mindset

0:08:43.440 --> 0:08:45.120
<v Speaker 1>he's going to be the Bell Couse Studs. So why

0:08:45.120 --> 0:08:47.719
<v Speaker 1>do you even want Washington if you're paying that mindset? Well,

0:08:47.960 --> 0:08:50.120
<v Speaker 1>at that point, yeah, I think I'd rather just take

0:08:50.160 --> 0:08:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Washington away from the guy who drafted Clyde Edwards, Hilaire.

0:08:53.600 --> 0:08:56.120
<v Speaker 1>I think Brian's right that this might be closer to

0:08:56.120 --> 0:08:57.719
<v Speaker 1>like a sixty forty split. And even though I'm on

0:08:57.720 --> 0:09:02.120
<v Speaker 1>the wrong side of forty, that's pretty good when it's

0:09:02.160 --> 0:09:04.320
<v Speaker 1>the Kansas City Chiefs averaging thirty three points a game,

0:09:04.400 --> 0:09:06.880
<v Speaker 1>and you know, rookies hit the wall towards the end

0:09:06.880 --> 0:09:09.240
<v Speaker 1>of the season when you really make your Hey, it

0:09:09.320 --> 0:09:12.640
<v Speaker 1>happens a lot and I don't know what. Yeah, alright,

0:09:14.760 --> 0:09:16.480
<v Speaker 1>very briefly, before we get into some of the key

0:09:16.480 --> 0:09:20.160
<v Speaker 1>off season moves, Antonio Brown is we now know the

0:09:20.280 --> 0:09:23.719
<v Speaker 1>terms of his suspension. It's it's it sounds like it's

0:09:23.720 --> 0:09:26.120
<v Speaker 1>going to be eight games. There could be more at

0:09:26.120 --> 0:09:29.720
<v Speaker 1>it on later, but it's eight games right now. Should

0:09:29.720 --> 0:09:32.440
<v Speaker 1>people that are drafting at this time of year based

0:09:32.440 --> 0:09:34.560
<v Speaker 1>on what we know right now? Is he draft able?

0:09:34.640 --> 0:09:36.360
<v Speaker 1>And if so, where would you take him? I have

0:09:36.400 --> 0:09:39.200
<v Speaker 1>a slightly hot take. I thought he was a good

0:09:39.280 --> 0:09:42.520
<v Speaker 1>late round flyer. I think this worse thans his draft

0:09:42.600 --> 0:09:45.000
<v Speaker 1>value for me because I know he's out for over

0:09:45.040 --> 0:09:47.480
<v Speaker 1>half the season in a season that could get shortened,

0:09:47.880 --> 0:09:50.160
<v Speaker 1>like I do, we have a ten game season. This

0:09:50.200 --> 0:09:52.199
<v Speaker 1>almost puts it to the point I don't think I'm

0:09:52.240 --> 0:09:55.480
<v Speaker 1>even throwing that late flyer on him anymore. All right,

0:09:55.640 --> 0:09:58.440
<v Speaker 1>do you feel any differently, Brian? I think I agree

0:09:58.480 --> 0:10:00.880
<v Speaker 1>with Fish, And you know, if I'm throw a dart

0:10:01.000 --> 0:10:02.600
<v Speaker 1>very late, I think I'd still rather throw a dart

0:10:02.640 --> 0:10:05.480
<v Speaker 1>at Josh Gordon or maybe than Jordan Reed, the former

0:10:05.520 --> 0:10:09.679
<v Speaker 1>big names. But I think the standard take at this point,

0:10:09.760 --> 0:10:12.320
<v Speaker 1>I thought, is value worse than I hate using up

0:10:12.360 --> 0:10:14.160
<v Speaker 1>a roster spot on a guy that I know is

0:10:14.200 --> 0:10:15.600
<v Speaker 1>not going to play for half of the year unless

0:10:15.640 --> 0:10:17.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm in a really really deep draft, and you know,

0:10:17.760 --> 0:10:19.720
<v Speaker 1>I know you love your deep draft. Scott and in

0:10:19.760 --> 0:10:23.400
<v Speaker 1>that case, sure, but assuming you care anything about you

0:10:23.440 --> 0:10:25.200
<v Speaker 1>know the weight of that roster spot and who else

0:10:25.240 --> 0:10:27.120
<v Speaker 1>you could be putting there. I hate carrying guys for

0:10:27.160 --> 0:10:29.599
<v Speaker 1>that long. All right, let's move on to the offseason

0:10:29.679 --> 0:10:33.000
<v Speaker 1>moves by position. Um, I've asked you guys to look

0:10:33.040 --> 0:10:35.040
<v Speaker 1>at each of the key moves in both the f

0:10:35.120 --> 0:10:39.400
<v Speaker 1>C and NFC. Let's begin in the NFC with the

0:10:39.440 --> 0:10:41.439
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay Buccaneers. So I have reason to believe you

0:10:41.480 --> 0:10:44.280
<v Speaker 1>have a new quarterback. Yeah, Tampa Bay now, right, Tom

0:10:44.320 --> 0:10:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Brady as we all know, a Buccaneer now and what

0:10:46.559 --> 0:10:50.000
<v Speaker 1>can you say loaded in the passing game with Chris Godwin,

0:10:50.040 --> 0:10:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Mike Evans, he should thrive and not to mention Rob

0:10:52.800 --> 0:10:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Gronkowski of course. O J. Howard hopefully still coming into

0:10:55.679 --> 0:10:57.679
<v Speaker 1>his own is this the best set of receivers he's

0:10:57.720 --> 0:11:03.640
<v Speaker 1>ever had? If go to I mean, Moss might take

0:11:03.720 --> 0:11:06.880
<v Speaker 1>him over the top. But let's speaking of great receivers.

0:11:07.000 --> 0:11:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Having two great receivers always works out well, even for

0:11:10.200 --> 0:11:14.160
<v Speaker 1>J Cutler and Josh McCown. In with Brandon Marshall and

0:11:14.160 --> 0:11:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Alison Jeffrey, who were very early teammates being drafted in

0:11:17.360 --> 0:11:21.040
<v Speaker 1>fantasy football, you combined McCown and Cutler, and they finished

0:11:21.120 --> 0:11:24.199
<v Speaker 1>uh quarterback six overall basically, and that was McCown and

0:11:24.200 --> 0:11:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Cutler with two great receivers. Give Brady these two guys,

0:11:26.920 --> 0:11:29.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, top six finish should be in the books. Um,

0:11:30.000 --> 0:11:32.240
<v Speaker 1>and I think he'll be close in terms of touchdowns

0:11:32.280 --> 0:11:35.280
<v Speaker 1>thrown top six, but other people will rush for fantasy

0:11:35.520 --> 0:11:38.240
<v Speaker 1>more fantasy points because of the Russia. All right, let's

0:11:38.280 --> 0:11:40.200
<v Speaker 1>go to the a f C. Let's go to the Colts.

0:11:41.400 --> 0:11:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Philip Rivers goes to the Colts behind the best offensive

0:11:44.080 --> 0:11:46.720
<v Speaker 1>line he's ever had. I don't know that the weapons

0:11:46.720 --> 0:11:48.400
<v Speaker 1>are the best he's ever had, but he's got his

0:11:48.480 --> 0:11:51.280
<v Speaker 1>checkdown running back like he had. He's he's got a good,

0:11:52.000 --> 0:11:55.840
<v Speaker 1>good young rookie running back to to take the pressure off. Um.

0:11:56.200 --> 0:11:58.439
<v Speaker 1>I think it might be, you know, pretty lateral to

0:11:58.520 --> 0:12:01.360
<v Speaker 1>what he was last year. But the problem is is

0:12:01.400 --> 0:12:03.200
<v Speaker 1>he washed. He did not look good at that in

0:12:03.200 --> 0:12:05.280
<v Speaker 1>the last two years, like he couldn't make it a

0:12:05.280 --> 0:12:07.800
<v Speaker 1>fall season before his arm died out. The upside is

0:12:08.080 --> 0:12:11.079
<v Speaker 1>this offensive line that you alluded to, best offensive He's

0:12:11.080 --> 0:12:13.520
<v Speaker 1>a statue back there. Best offensive line he's ever had

0:12:13.559 --> 0:12:16.719
<v Speaker 1>in his seventeen year career. He had eleven yard run

0:12:16.800 --> 0:12:21.600
<v Speaker 1>last year. Yes, and and now if you can get

0:12:21.640 --> 0:12:24.040
<v Speaker 1>t Y Hilton back to what he was healthy, I

0:12:24.040 --> 0:12:27.320
<v Speaker 1>think Paris Campbell's potentially sitting on on a nice rebound

0:12:27.360 --> 0:12:29.040
<v Speaker 1>off of injury last year. It could be the guy

0:12:29.040 --> 0:12:31.079
<v Speaker 1>that we thought he was. So maybe there's I think

0:12:31.080 --> 0:12:33.160
<v Speaker 1>there's some sneaky upside to Philip Rivers as sort of

0:12:33.200 --> 0:12:37.199
<v Speaker 1>last where he's let's go to Teddy Bridgewater in Carolina. Bran.

0:12:38.280 --> 0:12:40.120
<v Speaker 1>That almost sounded like a place. Let's go to Teddy

0:12:40.160 --> 0:12:45.959
<v Speaker 1>Bridgewater in Carolina. The Teddy Bridgewater is the answer to

0:12:46.040 --> 0:12:48.520
<v Speaker 1>your question. Well, if you're a fan of the long ball,

0:12:48.679 --> 0:12:53.199
<v Speaker 1>the deep ball, Teddy Bridgewater in Carolina is not. Uh yeah.

0:12:53.320 --> 0:12:55.880
<v Speaker 1>So last year, among quarterbacks with at least a hundred

0:12:55.880 --> 0:12:59.000
<v Speaker 1>past attempts, the average depth of target was eight point

0:12:59.040 --> 0:13:03.520
<v Speaker 1>seven yards. Teddy finished at six point one dead last,

0:13:03.640 --> 0:13:06.920
<v Speaker 1>more than half a yard behind the next guy. So

0:13:07.679 --> 0:13:09.040
<v Speaker 1>but you know what, this is a good spot for

0:13:09.040 --> 0:13:10.480
<v Speaker 1>a guy with a I don't wanna call it, say

0:13:10.480 --> 0:13:12.360
<v Speaker 1>a noodle arm. He just doesn't go downfield, but he

0:13:12.480 --> 0:13:14.880
<v Speaker 1>dump off to Christian McCaffrey. He dump it off to

0:13:15.000 --> 0:13:17.440
<v Speaker 1>DJ More. These guys can take at the house do

0:13:17.520 --> 0:13:20.200
<v Speaker 1>all the dirty work. But yet Teddy b is the

0:13:20.200 --> 0:13:22.199
<v Speaker 1>guy in Caroline and they did not want Cam Newton.

0:13:22.320 --> 0:13:24.880
<v Speaker 1>So there you go. All right, let's go to the Chargers.

0:13:26.080 --> 0:13:29.079
<v Speaker 1>Chargers get Tyrod Taylor, who might who might actually end

0:13:29.120 --> 0:13:30.920
<v Speaker 1>up in a little bit of a quarterback fight. But

0:13:30.960 --> 0:13:33.600
<v Speaker 1>he's he's got guys on his side, Anthony Lynn from Buffalo.

0:13:33.679 --> 0:13:37.000
<v Speaker 1>He's got better weapons potentially than he than he's had

0:13:37.080 --> 0:13:40.719
<v Speaker 1>in his career. He's got some rushing upside. Uh, It's

0:13:40.840 --> 0:13:42.880
<v Speaker 1>it's an okay spot for him. He's fine for where

0:13:42.920 --> 0:13:45.480
<v Speaker 1>he goes. Is a late flyer even in super flexing leagues.

0:13:45.520 --> 0:13:47.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he's draftable in one KB leagues mostly

0:13:47.720 --> 0:13:49.959
<v Speaker 1>now he's not. You do get that running potential to

0:13:50.040 --> 0:13:54.839
<v Speaker 1>Tyrod Brings. Let's go to Chicago. Don't play it yet

0:13:54.840 --> 0:13:56.920
<v Speaker 1>because it's just talking about Nick Foles. We're gonna get

0:13:56.960 --> 0:14:01.600
<v Speaker 1>into the heated battle between Nick Boles and and Sad

0:14:01.640 --> 0:14:06.280
<v Speaker 1>from Bonds. Sorry, first episode, I can't say the name right.

0:14:06.360 --> 0:14:08.240
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk about that a little more, but yes, Nick

0:14:08.280 --> 0:14:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Foles is in Chicago, all right. Then let's go to

0:14:11.840 --> 0:14:16.040
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders now Las Vegas. Just to backup Mariotta is

0:14:16.040 --> 0:14:18.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna backup car. They might have a have a training

0:14:18.760 --> 0:14:21.560
<v Speaker 1>camp battle, but that's about all there is there. We'll see,

0:14:21.560 --> 0:14:22.800
<v Speaker 1>we'll see if he can do it with a new

0:14:22.840 --> 0:14:25.480
<v Speaker 1>team if he gets the job. Sounds good. A couple

0:14:25.520 --> 0:14:27.320
<v Speaker 1>of quick backups that we might want to touch on

0:14:27.440 --> 0:14:29.360
<v Speaker 1>that are pretty notable in the NFC. Brian, I want

0:14:29.400 --> 0:14:31.440
<v Speaker 1>to just mention Jamis Winston, not because he's gonna be

0:14:31.520 --> 0:14:33.880
<v Speaker 1>very relevant when something happens to Breeze, but it completed

0:14:33.920 --> 0:14:37.400
<v Speaker 1>this perfect quarterback carousel between the Patriots, the Panthers, the

0:14:37.440 --> 0:14:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Saints and the Bucks. They all interchanged quarterbacks. If you

0:14:40.280 --> 0:14:44.120
<v Speaker 1>think about it, Newton to New England, New England, Brady,

0:14:44.120 --> 0:14:46.040
<v Speaker 1>you went to Tampa Bay. But I won't go on.

0:14:46.160 --> 0:14:49.200
<v Speaker 1>But uh yet really, uh doesn't matter in a one

0:14:49.280 --> 0:14:51.840
<v Speaker 1>quarterback leaks a handcuff for Breeze and super Flex, but

0:14:51.880 --> 0:14:55.640
<v Speaker 1>that's it. Speaking of the Patriots and Newton, Yeah, could

0:14:55.680 --> 0:14:58.880
<v Speaker 1>you argue these are his best wide receivers he's had,

0:14:59.080 --> 0:15:02.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Kelvin Benjamin Like it hasn't been good, Like

0:15:02.920 --> 0:15:06.200
<v Speaker 1>it hasn't been great. Yeah, So Cam Newton goes to

0:15:06.240 --> 0:15:09.240
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots. I have a feeling if if he's able

0:15:09.280 --> 0:15:12.320
<v Speaker 1>to run again. If he's overall his injuries, he could

0:15:12.360 --> 0:15:15.880
<v Speaker 1>be a top twelve quarterback once again. But uh, we're

0:15:15.880 --> 0:15:18.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to see it first before we get to

0:15:19.200 --> 0:15:21.360
<v Speaker 1>the running backs, the receivers, and the tight ends and

0:15:21.400 --> 0:15:23.800
<v Speaker 1>the players that have moved around. Let's take a quick break.

0:15:24.280 --> 0:15:26.760
<v Speaker 1>If you would like to get my cheat sheet for free,

0:15:27.120 --> 0:15:29.360
<v Speaker 1>you get to do that it just go to gaillotein

0:15:29.400 --> 0:15:31.600
<v Speaker 1>leagues dot com Guillotine leagues dot com. That is the

0:15:31.600 --> 0:15:35.960
<v Speaker 1>new destination for my free cheat sheet for re draft

0:15:36.000 --> 0:15:39.400
<v Speaker 1>leaks PPR leagues. Whether you're looking for auction values, hundred

0:15:39.440 --> 0:15:41.560
<v Speaker 1>dollar auction value, student dollar auction values, for just play

0:15:41.640 --> 0:15:44.880
<v Speaker 1>rankings for your draft, the cheat sheets are free at

0:15:44.880 --> 0:15:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Guillotine leagues dot com. When we come back, we'll go

0:15:47.560 --> 0:15:50.480
<v Speaker 1>through some of the rest of the moves across the

0:15:50.680 --> 0:15:53.200
<v Speaker 1>n f L and the training camp battles. We can't

0:15:53.200 --> 0:16:17.040
<v Speaker 1>wait to watch. It's Fantasy Football Weekly. Welcome back and

0:16:17.080 --> 0:16:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football Weekly Scott Fish, Brian Johnson from Guillotine Leagues

0:16:22.320 --> 0:16:24.640
<v Speaker 1>dot com on Paul Charge and from Guillotine leagues dot com.

0:16:24.640 --> 0:16:29.440
<v Speaker 1>You're number twenty six, Segment number two a Fantasy Football Weekly, Guys.

0:16:29.560 --> 0:16:33.360
<v Speaker 1>Last segment we started breaking down the player movements from

0:16:33.400 --> 0:16:36.160
<v Speaker 1>the off season, touching a little bit on the fantasy

0:16:36.240 --> 0:16:39.080
<v Speaker 1>relevancy of these moves. We got through the quarterbacks, Let's

0:16:39.080 --> 0:16:43.120
<v Speaker 1>turn our attention to the running backs, beginning with the Broncos.

0:16:44.280 --> 0:16:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Broncos brought in Melvin Gordon. They signed him to a contract,

0:16:47.840 --> 0:16:49.960
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a surprise move. Thought Philip Lindsay

0:16:50.000 --> 0:16:52.120
<v Speaker 1>was gonna be the guy there, but they lost a

0:16:52.160 --> 0:16:54.760
<v Speaker 1>bunt of book or so. Maybe they don't know, but

0:16:55.080 --> 0:16:57.200
<v Speaker 1>I think Gordon is going to be the main guy there.

0:16:57.200 --> 0:16:59.720
<v Speaker 1>But they'll both get work. It's it's kind of a

0:17:00.240 --> 0:17:02.440
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of painful for both of them because it

0:17:02.520 --> 0:17:05.119
<v Speaker 1>turned two bell cows into the half bell cous It

0:17:05.200 --> 0:17:07.600
<v Speaker 1>really did. And Philip Lindsay is going very late in

0:17:07.680 --> 0:17:10.520
<v Speaker 1>drafts right now, and I think being a little bit underappreciated.

0:17:11.080 --> 0:17:14.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't I'm not positive Melvin Gordon's that good. We'll

0:17:14.320 --> 0:17:16.320
<v Speaker 1>find out. We'll learn more about whether whether or not

0:17:16.359 --> 0:17:20.879
<v Speaker 1>even in this new environment. Let's go to Let's go

0:17:20.920 --> 0:17:25.000
<v Speaker 1>to Atlanta next. Bryan Todd Gurley returns home to Atlanta. Gurly,

0:17:25.080 --> 0:17:28.040
<v Speaker 1>by the way, ranked number fifty one in the NFL's

0:17:28.080 --> 0:17:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Top one list that's the biggest PS list of all time.

0:17:31.960 --> 0:17:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Wow one maybe possibly Anyway, Atlanta was one of five

0:17:37.119 --> 0:17:40.280
<v Speaker 1>teams that ran the ball less than twenty three times

0:17:40.320 --> 0:17:43.600
<v Speaker 1>per game last season, and according to Pro Football Focus,

0:17:43.680 --> 0:17:47.560
<v Speaker 1>the Atlanta offensive line posted their worst run and past

0:17:47.640 --> 0:17:51.080
<v Speaker 1>blocking grades of the Matt Ryan era last season. That

0:17:51.200 --> 0:17:53.240
<v Speaker 1>era is now lasted forever by the way that Matt

0:17:53.280 --> 0:17:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Ryan era. And uh, the Falcons sunk two first round

0:17:56.640 --> 0:17:59.320
<v Speaker 1>picks into their old line last year, Chris Lindstrom and

0:17:59.400 --> 0:18:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Caleb mc gary. They both looked like busts last year.

0:18:02.359 --> 0:18:04.560
<v Speaker 1>So they don't turn it around. It's not an ideal

0:18:04.640 --> 0:18:07.920
<v Speaker 1>landing spot for girly. I'm not super excited about this. Uh,

0:18:08.000 --> 0:18:10.879
<v Speaker 1>let's go to Miami where they've got two new running backs.

0:18:10.960 --> 0:18:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Have to remember remember all the all the disaster level

0:18:14.760 --> 0:18:17.160
<v Speaker 1>running backs they had last year. Yeah, apparently they didn't

0:18:17.160 --> 0:18:20.600
<v Speaker 1>want Ryan Fitzpatrick to leave the team Russian again, so

0:18:20.600 --> 0:18:22.720
<v Speaker 1>so they brought in Jordan Howard and they trade it

0:18:22.840 --> 0:18:26.239
<v Speaker 1>during the draft fifth router from Matt breidauh Uh. I

0:18:26.280 --> 0:18:29.000
<v Speaker 1>don't love either of them. I just don't for fantasy,

0:18:29.040 --> 0:18:31.960
<v Speaker 1>but uh, I think Howard is most likely going to

0:18:32.040 --> 0:18:34.320
<v Speaker 1>be the Bell Cow and uh, or the at least

0:18:34.359 --> 0:18:38.000
<v Speaker 1>the main runner. He'll be the sixty of the sixty split. Uh.

0:18:38.080 --> 0:18:40.320
<v Speaker 1>There's a little value there, but only if you get

0:18:40.320 --> 0:18:43.560
<v Speaker 1>it cheap. Dolphins offensive line just dreadful, which makes it

0:18:43.600 --> 0:18:46.480
<v Speaker 1>a little bit tricky to trust either of those guys.

0:18:46.840 --> 0:18:48.639
<v Speaker 1>Seattle gets a guy. I think it's gonna be back up.

0:18:48.640 --> 0:18:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Other people think that he's getting pressed for starting time.

0:18:51.000 --> 0:18:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about Carlos side. It really thumbs down the

0:18:55.359 --> 0:18:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Rashad Penny backup value. It's still Chris Carson is the guy.

0:18:58.760 --> 0:19:02.200
<v Speaker 1>He's healthy. There was worried, worried about the worries about

0:19:02.200 --> 0:19:03.880
<v Speaker 1>his leg going into the season. But he's good to go.

0:19:04.200 --> 0:19:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Only if he starts foaming a lot, then Carlos I

0:19:06.240 --> 0:19:07.760
<v Speaker 1>had becomes something. But we don't have to talk about

0:19:07.800 --> 0:19:11.960
<v Speaker 1>him anymore. Okay, let's go to the Jaguars Scott where

0:19:12.240 --> 0:19:15.560
<v Speaker 1>the Jaguars make kind of a you know, a modest move. Yeah,

0:19:15.640 --> 0:19:19.200
<v Speaker 1>if they picked up Chris Thompson, if he can stay healthy,

0:19:19.240 --> 0:19:20.680
<v Speaker 1>he might get a lot of he might get more

0:19:20.680 --> 0:19:24.320
<v Speaker 1>receptions than people think. I mean. Leonard four Nette was

0:19:24.440 --> 0:19:27.879
<v Speaker 1>third on the team in targets and first in receptions

0:19:28.040 --> 0:19:30.160
<v Speaker 1>for the Jaguars last year for a running back, which

0:19:30.160 --> 0:19:32.760
<v Speaker 1>is and for Leonard Fournette, which is crazy. So I

0:19:32.800 --> 0:19:35.879
<v Speaker 1>expect Chris Thompson to eat into that, you know, losing

0:19:35.960 --> 0:19:38.080
<v Speaker 1>value for Nett and maybe a little you know, flex

0:19:38.200 --> 0:19:40.640
<v Speaker 1>value for Tomas and he's an old j Gruden guy,

0:19:40.720 --> 0:19:43.240
<v Speaker 1>the new O C for the Jaguars. A mytory there.

0:19:43.640 --> 0:19:46.399
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to the wide receiver position and Arizona with

0:19:46.400 --> 0:19:48.800
<v Speaker 1>the biggest move at that position and maybe the biggest

0:19:48.840 --> 0:19:51.840
<v Speaker 1>move overall this offseason. Yeah, definitely. Uh. Of course you're

0:19:51.840 --> 0:19:54.640
<v Speaker 1>talking about DeAndre Hopkins now a Cardinal, and the main

0:19:54.680 --> 0:19:56.879
<v Speaker 1>concern really is will he see the you know, the

0:19:56.920 --> 0:19:59.680
<v Speaker 1>massive target sherre he saw in Houston And at first

0:19:59.720 --> 0:20:02.720
<v Speaker 1>you think probably not. But I was shocked at Arizona

0:20:02.760 --> 0:20:05.680
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers as a whole total the most receptions last

0:20:05.760 --> 0:20:07.960
<v Speaker 1>year at two d and thirty eight nearly fifteen per

0:20:08.000 --> 0:20:10.800
<v Speaker 1>game for reference, the Texans finished with two hundred eight.

0:20:11.200 --> 0:20:14.040
<v Speaker 1>And it's not like it was basically Larry Fitzgerald Christian

0:20:14.080 --> 0:20:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Kirk in the mere Bird. Yeah, and now Hopkins takes

0:20:17.160 --> 0:20:19.320
<v Speaker 1>the mere Bird spot. So yeah, I'm not worried about

0:20:19.359 --> 0:20:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Hopkins at all. In Arizona. I'm actually quite excited to

0:20:21.560 --> 0:20:26.840
<v Speaker 1>see what happens here. Bird now just totally shot. I'm

0:20:26.840 --> 0:20:29.560
<v Speaker 1>really really disappointed. Let's go to Buffalo where they gained

0:20:29.560 --> 0:20:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Stefan Diggs. They did gain Stefan Diggs. He's he's probably

0:20:32.840 --> 0:20:35.920
<v Speaker 1>the the de facto one now they're in Buffalo. Uh

0:20:35.960 --> 0:20:39.800
<v Speaker 1>He's he's a nice target for Josh Allen. Uh I.

0:20:39.800 --> 0:20:42.240
<v Speaker 1>I can see a very frustrating season for Diggs with

0:20:42.359 --> 0:20:46.479
<v Speaker 1>the inaccuracy deep. Nobody's giving Emmanuel Sanders much loving in

0:20:46.760 --> 0:20:49.480
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans, and I think this is a blown opportunity

0:20:49.520 --> 0:20:51.720
<v Speaker 1>for fantasy owners. They should be as long as the

0:20:52.160 --> 0:20:55.040
<v Speaker 1>target distribution doesn't go like this among wide receivers. Here

0:20:55.080 --> 0:20:57.440
<v Speaker 1>was the distribution last year for the Saints. White out

0:20:57.680 --> 0:21:01.439
<v Speaker 1>Michael Thomas one hundred and eighty five, Ted Gain fifty

0:21:01.520 --> 0:21:05.240
<v Speaker 1>six Trey Kwan Smith. The next listed wide receiver on

0:21:05.280 --> 0:21:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Pro Football Rippons was Taysom Hill with twenty two targets.

0:21:08.359 --> 0:21:11.840
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, you would think Sanders will be pushing more

0:21:11.880 --> 0:21:15.080
<v Speaker 1>of the one hundred target threshold than if he gets that.

0:21:15.160 --> 0:21:17.680
<v Speaker 1>In that offense where Michael Thomas commands a lot of attention,

0:21:17.920 --> 0:21:20.840
<v Speaker 1>he'll be a viable fantasy starter this season. Still got

0:21:20.880 --> 0:21:23.000
<v Speaker 1>some gas in the tank for sure, Scott who fills

0:21:23.119 --> 0:21:27.480
<v Speaker 1>the void left by DeAndre Hopkins. A couple of players.

0:21:27.520 --> 0:21:30.800
<v Speaker 1>You've got Randall Cobb coming in and Brandon Cooks. Cooks

0:21:30.800 --> 0:21:33.919
<v Speaker 1>will probably be on the outside with Fuller on the

0:21:33.960 --> 0:21:36.360
<v Speaker 1>other side. Cobb playing the slot mostly is a nice

0:21:36.400 --> 0:21:39.359
<v Speaker 1>big slock eye for them. Um, it's it's gonna be

0:21:39.400 --> 0:21:43.800
<v Speaker 1>interesting to see that offense without DeAndre Hopkins. I'm a

0:21:43.840 --> 0:21:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Fuller guy. I actually like Fuller both better than both

0:21:46.600 --> 0:21:48.480
<v Speaker 1>of these guys. When Fuller is healthy, He's got that

0:21:48.520 --> 0:21:52.720
<v Speaker 1>connection with with with DeShawn Watson. Yeah, of course, it's

0:21:52.800 --> 0:21:55.080
<v Speaker 1>just all about the health, the Lennie's healthy part, right,

0:21:55.400 --> 0:21:58.159
<v Speaker 1>real quick, I saw Randall Cobb just realized he needed

0:21:58.200 --> 0:22:00.800
<v Speaker 1>glasses and he finds so you can find he just

0:22:00.920 --> 0:22:06.880
<v Speaker 1>got so season coming Ford Cop. So you're the Panthers,

0:22:06.920 --> 0:22:09.560
<v Speaker 1>you go and signed Teddy Bridgewater, the most feeble armed

0:22:09.600 --> 0:22:12.760
<v Speaker 1>quarterback starting quarterback in the NFL. And so who do

0:22:12.760 --> 0:22:15.159
<v Speaker 1>you decide to pair him with? Brian Yeah, this is

0:22:15.200 --> 0:22:18.760
<v Speaker 1>fitting the square peg in the round hole with Robbie Anderson.

0:22:19.040 --> 0:22:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Uh Over thirty of Anderson's targets, where twenty plus yards

0:22:23.200 --> 0:22:25.399
<v Speaker 1>last season. That was one of the highest percentages in

0:22:25.440 --> 0:22:27.920
<v Speaker 1>the league for deep past targets. And this is just

0:22:28.000 --> 0:22:29.920
<v Speaker 1>like you said, not a good fit. So I don't

0:22:30.359 --> 0:22:32.600
<v Speaker 1>see how this goes for Robbie. I will not touch

0:22:32.680 --> 0:22:35.399
<v Speaker 1>him in redraft. He is a best ball uh spike

0:22:35.480 --> 0:22:39.480
<v Speaker 1>week dart throw and left behind from the Jets. Who

0:22:39.520 --> 0:22:42.239
<v Speaker 1>did they fill in Robbie Anderson with? Oh, they got

0:22:42.240 --> 0:22:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Brashop Perriman and they Yeah, it's like Pairman is basically

0:22:46.800 --> 0:22:48.119
<v Speaker 1>the same guy I love, by the way, and the

0:22:48.160 --> 0:22:50.680
<v Speaker 1>last one I said big slock eye for red Cop.

0:22:51.760 --> 0:22:55.640
<v Speaker 1>He's not big, but yeah, Perriman fills that role. Honestly,

0:22:55.800 --> 0:22:58.080
<v Speaker 1>it could be very good for Pairman because they don't

0:22:58.119 --> 0:23:00.280
<v Speaker 1>have much there. They got Perraman and Mims. What else

0:23:00.280 --> 0:23:04.320
<v Speaker 1>are they gonna thy Jamison crowder Man. We'll go to

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:06.359
<v Speaker 1>war over that later. Let's go let's go to the

0:23:06.359 --> 0:23:08.959
<v Speaker 1>tight end position. Atlantic gets one of my favorite sleeper

0:23:09.000 --> 0:23:12.439
<v Speaker 1>tight ends. Yeah, Hayden Hurst coming over from Baltimore or

0:23:12.440 --> 0:23:15.080
<v Speaker 1>coming down from Baltimore, I should say. Austin Hooper saw

0:23:15.240 --> 0:23:17.520
<v Speaker 1>nineties seven targets last year with the Falcons. That was

0:23:17.600 --> 0:23:21.120
<v Speaker 1>the sixth the most and he only played he didn't

0:23:21.119 --> 0:23:23.760
<v Speaker 1>play a full season, and um, those are all going

0:23:23.800 --> 0:23:26.160
<v Speaker 1>to Hayde and Hurst, and the Atlanta offense is a well,

0:23:26.320 --> 0:23:29.600
<v Speaker 1>well oiled machine. Tight end has always been heavily involved.

0:23:29.920 --> 0:23:32.160
<v Speaker 1>He won't. Atlanta tight end has seen at least eighty

0:23:32.160 --> 0:23:34.680
<v Speaker 1>targets in eight of Matt Ryan's twelve seasons. I think

0:23:34.760 --> 0:23:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Levine Toilolo was the one guy didn't do it and stuff.

0:23:39.920 --> 0:23:45.560
<v Speaker 1>But remember Hayden Hurst drafted before Lamar Jackson. Right, yeah,

0:23:45.840 --> 0:23:48.600
<v Speaker 1>there you go. He's gonna be a monster. Let's go

0:23:48.720 --> 0:23:52.840
<v Speaker 1>to the Steelers with a sizeable void and yeah, yeah,

0:23:52.880 --> 0:23:55.119
<v Speaker 1>they brought into Eric Ebron, who has been tweeting that

0:23:55.160 --> 0:23:57.639
<v Speaker 1>you should be taking him very rely. He thinks, he

0:23:57.800 --> 0:23:59.920
<v Speaker 1>thinks he's basically he thinks he's got and d a

0:24:00.000 --> 0:24:03.280
<v Speaker 1>a player, thinks he's good. He says, I play fantasy,

0:24:03.320 --> 0:24:07.800
<v Speaker 1>I should I'm better than these guys. He's got the

0:24:07.840 --> 0:24:12.760
<v Speaker 1>opportunity there. Let's go to the Seattle Seahawks. It's always

0:24:12.760 --> 0:24:15.639
<v Speaker 1>been a it's been a revolving door since really the

0:24:15.720 --> 0:24:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Graham trade went down. Let's talk about who they've acquired. Yeah,

0:24:19.720 --> 0:24:22.360
<v Speaker 1>Greg Olsen not going up in the booth just yet.

0:24:22.359 --> 0:24:25.840
<v Speaker 1>He is now Seahawks. The Seahawks tight ends between Will

0:24:25.920 --> 0:24:28.880
<v Speaker 1>dis Lay and like Jacob Hollister. Guys like that actually

0:24:28.920 --> 0:24:32.240
<v Speaker 1>totaled the twelve most catches in the fifth most touchdowns

0:24:32.240 --> 0:24:34.919
<v Speaker 1>among tight ends last season. So Greg Golson gets the

0:24:34.920 --> 0:24:37.120
<v Speaker 1>majority of run at the tight end position, he could

0:24:37.280 --> 0:24:40.240
<v Speaker 1>be a viable fantasy asset. All right, thank you guys.

0:24:40.240 --> 0:24:42.720
<v Speaker 1>Those are the offseason moves that matter the most to

0:24:42.920 --> 0:24:46.240
<v Speaker 1>fantasy owners. I now want to turn my attention to

0:24:46.560 --> 0:24:51.320
<v Speaker 1>the training camp battles that you're going to be watching.

0:24:51.320 --> 0:24:53.480
<v Speaker 1>That we're all going to be watching. The guys. These

0:24:53.560 --> 0:24:56.840
<v Speaker 1>the battles that you can get the winner you've got

0:24:56.880 --> 0:24:58.880
<v Speaker 1>a real leg up on, and something that will want

0:24:58.880 --> 0:25:01.439
<v Speaker 1>to track throughout the core of the preseason. A training

0:25:01.440 --> 0:25:07.440
<v Speaker 1>camps will wetseason. So just have to keep our nose

0:25:07.520 --> 0:25:09.800
<v Speaker 1>to the ground for news. I know it's gonna be crazy.

0:25:09.880 --> 0:25:12.440
<v Speaker 1>It's you know, normally you can get so much good

0:25:12.480 --> 0:25:16.080
<v Speaker 1>and sometimes bad data out of the preseason games. But

0:25:16.440 --> 0:25:18.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, without that was gonna be a lot more

0:25:18.359 --> 0:25:20.760
<v Speaker 1>guesswork on the ease. And that's okay. Well, we'll look

0:25:20.760 --> 0:25:23.640
<v Speaker 1>and try to figure out the battles that we want

0:25:23.680 --> 0:25:27.199
<v Speaker 1>to be tracking throughout the course of the preseason, but

0:25:27.280 --> 0:25:31.120
<v Speaker 1>not any preseason games training camp. Maybe that's a better

0:25:31.119 --> 0:25:33.080
<v Speaker 1>way to put it. All right, let's begin with the

0:25:33.320 --> 0:25:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Let's begin in the A F C. Scott, what's the

0:25:34.960 --> 0:25:38.000
<v Speaker 1>first training camp battle that you were monitored? Buffalo Bills

0:25:38.119 --> 0:25:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Devin Singletary and Zack Moss. Zack Moss drafted by the

0:25:42.040 --> 0:25:45.159
<v Speaker 1>Bills to I guess replace Frank Gore and all the

0:25:45.160 --> 0:25:48.800
<v Speaker 1>other running backs. Uh. There, Singletary should get more of

0:25:48.840 --> 0:25:51.120
<v Speaker 1>a workload. He was one of the most elusive backs

0:25:51.160 --> 0:25:54.240
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL last year when he did get the ball.

0:25:54.880 --> 0:25:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Both these guys can pass catch, so it's gonna be

0:25:57.040 --> 0:26:01.159
<v Speaker 1>an interesting split. Singletary small, so I think maybe they

0:26:01.240 --> 0:26:03.640
<v Speaker 1>just want to keep keep both of them healthy. They might.

0:26:03.720 --> 0:26:06.840
<v Speaker 1>It might be one of those deals. All right, And

0:26:06.880 --> 0:26:12.360
<v Speaker 1>we alluded to the Bears not that long ago last segment.

0:26:12.480 --> 0:26:15.520
<v Speaker 1>What's going on? Uh do we really care? Is what's gone?

0:26:15.640 --> 0:26:18.479
<v Speaker 1>But Okay, Nick Foles versus Mitch Dubisky, here's how it's

0:26:18.520 --> 0:26:21.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna go. Foles will get the job to start the season.

0:26:21.040 --> 0:26:24.480
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna hope you can manage some games and win

0:26:24.800 --> 0:26:26.840
<v Speaker 1>behind a pretty good defense. But there are way too

0:26:26.880 --> 0:26:30.000
<v Speaker 1>many holes on that team as a whole. So Bortles

0:26:30.040 --> 0:26:31.560
<v Speaker 1>will come in at some point when they decide to

0:26:31.560 --> 0:26:33.920
<v Speaker 1>tank for Trevor Lawrence Chicago. That is, they're going to

0:26:34.000 --> 0:26:36.720
<v Speaker 1>finish with the worst record in the NFL. There's my prediction.

0:26:36.800 --> 0:26:38.720
<v Speaker 1>And we shouldn't care about this when it comes to

0:26:38.760 --> 0:26:40.800
<v Speaker 1>a fantasy football perspective, but there is a battle for

0:26:41.119 --> 0:26:43.880
<v Speaker 1>quarterback in Chicago. You know, I gave I gave Nick

0:26:43.920 --> 0:26:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Foles the happy trombone you never actually said the name

0:26:47.600 --> 0:26:51.720
<v Speaker 1>of because I was figuring that that speaks for itself.

0:26:51.920 --> 0:26:54.919
<v Speaker 1>I get, I get. I like that. I like the

0:26:54.960 --> 0:26:57.320
<v Speaker 1>one where the guy plays the trombone with his his butt,

0:26:57.320 --> 0:27:00.760
<v Speaker 1>though that one's way funnier. That's not No, he's playing

0:27:00.760 --> 0:27:03.720
<v Speaker 1>with his mouth. And I'm thinking of a different scene. Yes,

0:27:03.920 --> 0:27:07.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't know what movie you're thinking. I think,

0:27:08.320 --> 0:27:12.360
<v Speaker 1>uh huh, okay, yeah, I'll do my research. Right, let's

0:27:12.520 --> 0:27:14.280
<v Speaker 1>more bars talk, please, Let's go back to the A

0:27:14.400 --> 0:27:18.800
<v Speaker 1>f C. Scott Uh. Since Narny Bengals, we're looking for

0:27:18.840 --> 0:27:21.680
<v Speaker 1>another receiver in that group from Tait and from aud

0:27:22.040 --> 0:27:25.400
<v Speaker 1>T Higgins, John Ross. Uh. The way on tape played

0:27:25.440 --> 0:27:27.200
<v Speaker 1>last year, I know they put some draft capital and

0:27:27.240 --> 0:27:29.679
<v Speaker 1>Tee Higgins and the way John Ross played at the

0:27:29.720 --> 0:27:31.919
<v Speaker 1>beginning of the season. I think it's gonna be a

0:27:31.920 --> 0:27:34.399
<v Speaker 1>pretty decent battle. There's there's a lot of upside with

0:27:34.440 --> 0:27:36.600
<v Speaker 1>all of them. We're gonna be watching to see which

0:27:36.640 --> 0:27:39.800
<v Speaker 1>one of them emerges as that three and uh, it

0:27:39.840 --> 0:27:43.280
<v Speaker 1>could be some fantasy relevant games there all. Right. Back

0:27:43.320 --> 0:27:47.680
<v Speaker 1>to the NFC and the Tampa Bay running back situation, Brian, Yeah,

0:27:47.680 --> 0:27:50.520
<v Speaker 1>a new member to the party in Lashawn McCoy now,

0:27:50.600 --> 0:27:54.199
<v Speaker 1>but it's still really Ronald Jones versus Keyshawn Von. Keyshawn

0:27:54.280 --> 0:27:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Von of course is on the COVID list right now.

0:27:56.359 --> 0:27:58.520
<v Speaker 1>But I guess that's a good thing because you know,

0:27:58.560 --> 0:28:00.359
<v Speaker 1>you got it out of the way. Most likely you're

0:28:00.359 --> 0:28:02.119
<v Speaker 1>not gonna get during the season. We don't even know

0:28:02.160 --> 0:28:08.160
<v Speaker 1>that about COVID yet contact and didn't actually get it. Yeah,

0:28:09.600 --> 0:28:13.520
<v Speaker 1>ding there for roster space alright, in a perfect world

0:28:13.520 --> 0:28:15.560
<v Speaker 1>with no COVID, let's look at the football players at

0:28:15.600 --> 0:28:18.280
<v Speaker 1>hand here. Uh. According to Warren Sharpe, who was one

0:28:18.320 --> 0:28:21.320
<v Speaker 1>of the sharpest football minds out there, Ronald Jones ranked

0:28:21.320 --> 0:28:23.800
<v Speaker 1>as a top three red zone running back last year

0:28:23.840 --> 0:28:26.919
<v Speaker 1>among running backs with at least twenty plus carries inside

0:28:26.960 --> 0:28:30.240
<v Speaker 1>the twenty. Rojoe had a very strong second half, finished

0:28:30.240 --> 0:28:33.240
<v Speaker 1>as a top twenty four running back in PPR. Of course,

0:28:33.320 --> 0:28:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Keyshawn von Keyshawn Vaughn rookie coming in gonna push him

0:28:36.320 --> 0:28:38.040
<v Speaker 1>in camp. We just gotta have this plays out. But

0:28:38.080 --> 0:28:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Bruce arians does like a workhorse back, So one of

0:28:40.840 --> 0:28:43.800
<v Speaker 1>these guys should win the job and have a significant

0:28:43.840 --> 0:28:46.440
<v Speaker 1>touches on a weekly basis. This is one of the

0:28:46.480 --> 0:28:50.320
<v Speaker 1>few that I really don't have a strong feeling for

0:28:50.320 --> 0:28:53.440
<v Speaker 1>who's gonna end up winning. It's just, you know, I

0:28:53.520 --> 0:28:55.200
<v Speaker 1>just I need I need more data points on this,

0:28:55.240 --> 0:28:56.440
<v Speaker 1>and I don't know if we're gonna get them. And

0:28:56.640 --> 0:28:59.400
<v Speaker 1>just because without the preseason games, I tend to lean

0:28:59.400 --> 0:29:01.560
<v Speaker 1>towards vet or and I would break my ties towards

0:29:01.640 --> 0:29:05.520
<v Speaker 1>veterans right now if I had depict right now, Let's

0:29:05.560 --> 0:29:08.200
<v Speaker 1>go to Denver and a running back situation. We've already

0:29:08.200 --> 0:29:10.560
<v Speaker 1>alluded to, We already talked about it. I could go

0:29:10.560 --> 0:29:12.920
<v Speaker 1>on to a new team or not. Go ahead, let's

0:29:12.920 --> 0:29:14.840
<v Speaker 1>go to Houston. We've talked about Gordon and Lindsay. Let's

0:29:14.920 --> 0:29:19.000
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about Houston. Duke Johnson, uh David Johnson got traded,

0:29:19.400 --> 0:29:24.040
<v Speaker 1>got got traded there for DeAndre Hopkins somehow. Uh, that's

0:29:24.040 --> 0:29:26.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a battle to watch because I think there

0:29:26.360 --> 0:29:27.880
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of people out there they think David

0:29:27.920 --> 0:29:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Johnson might just be washed. He didn't. He looked terrible

0:29:31.720 --> 0:29:35.400
<v Speaker 1>last year. Uh, or is Bob going to try to

0:29:35.400 --> 0:29:39.840
<v Speaker 1>shove him down our throats? Because it's gonna be interesting

0:29:39.960 --> 0:29:42.280
<v Speaker 1>to see what both of those running backs have. All Right,

0:29:42.320 --> 0:29:46.280
<v Speaker 1>we go to Washington where it's a four man battle

0:29:46.400 --> 0:29:48.800
<v Speaker 1>for Carri's in the backfield. Yeah, or maybe three and

0:29:48.880 --> 0:29:51.160
<v Speaker 1>a half because we're not sure what Antonio Gibson really

0:29:51.200 --> 0:29:53.040
<v Speaker 1>plays yet, a rookie who was a running back in

0:29:53.080 --> 0:29:55.480
<v Speaker 1>a wide receiver. But then the other three Adrian Peterson,

0:29:55.600 --> 0:29:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Darius Guice and now Peyton Barber. Oh I mentioned earlier

0:29:58.720 --> 0:30:01.840
<v Speaker 1>up from Tampa Bay. I want no part of this whatsoever.

0:30:01.920 --> 0:30:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Washington's line currently ranked twenty nine by Pro Football Focus. Uh.

0:30:05.480 --> 0:30:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Trent Williams is long gone, of course at left tackle,

0:30:08.400 --> 0:30:10.800
<v Speaker 1>and um, it's all about his Darius guys. For real,

0:30:10.880 --> 0:30:13.840
<v Speaker 1>he looks great with no shirt on on Twitter, but

0:30:13.920 --> 0:30:15.600
<v Speaker 1>you know what, he's still not half of the physical

0:30:15.640 --> 0:30:19.160
<v Speaker 1>specimen that Adrian Peterson is at aged thirties six, But uh,

0:30:19.360 --> 0:30:23.000
<v Speaker 1>I still like ap Overall among this group, the Colts

0:30:23.040 --> 0:30:26.120
<v Speaker 1>have got t Y Hilton. But after that, how do

0:30:26.120 --> 0:30:29.560
<v Speaker 1>you think this thing is? It shapes up battling. Yeah.

0:30:29.560 --> 0:30:32.440
<v Speaker 1>They invested a ton of draft capital in Paris Campbell

0:30:32.520 --> 0:30:35.520
<v Speaker 1>last year, Michael Pittman this year. Zach Pascal had some

0:30:35.560 --> 0:30:38.840
<v Speaker 1>decent games, mostly from the slot. Last year, I think

0:30:38.880 --> 0:30:41.000
<v Speaker 1>we're looking more to the outside with Pittman and Campbell.

0:30:41.000 --> 0:30:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Though it's Campbell's got a year in that system and

0:30:43.680 --> 0:30:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Pittman's a rookie, So a lot of people are thinking

0:30:46.120 --> 0:30:49.680
<v Speaker 1>this year fade rookies. Maybe that's the case with this alright,

0:30:49.720 --> 0:30:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Detroit's running back situation is unique. At this time last year,

0:30:52.960 --> 0:30:55.840
<v Speaker 1>I was optimistic that carry On Johnson was gonna shake

0:30:55.880 --> 0:30:57.640
<v Speaker 1>off the injuries and all the problems he had in

0:30:57.680 --> 0:31:00.000
<v Speaker 1>his rookie year and come back is a much better sophomore.

0:31:00.000 --> 0:31:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Are that never happened? Continue to be heard and underwhelmed.

0:31:03.840 --> 0:31:06.360
<v Speaker 1>They end up drafting DeAndre Swift. Yeah, and it was

0:31:06.400 --> 0:31:08.360
<v Speaker 1>still kind of a surprise pick in the second round,

0:31:08.720 --> 0:31:10.680
<v Speaker 1>but I think Detroit could not resist Swift, who was

0:31:10.680 --> 0:31:12.400
<v Speaker 1>a first round talent, So they just had to go

0:31:12.440 --> 0:31:15.400
<v Speaker 1>with him, and he's electric as they come a little

0:31:15.480 --> 0:31:19.440
<v Speaker 1>undersized at five nine pounds, so I don't expect full

0:31:19.880 --> 0:31:21.959
<v Speaker 1>bell cow usage out of the gate, or maybe not

0:31:22.000 --> 0:31:23.680
<v Speaker 1>at all the season, But he's one of the one

0:31:23.760 --> 0:31:26.320
<v Speaker 1>rookie runners who I think, uh usurps you know, the

0:31:26.360 --> 0:31:30.200
<v Speaker 1>incumbent quite quite easily in Jacksonville. They got DJ Chart

0:31:30.360 --> 0:31:33.200
<v Speaker 1>and then after that, what does this training camp battle

0:31:33.200 --> 0:31:35.400
<v Speaker 1>look like? Yeah, they have Chris Connley, your guy that

0:31:35.600 --> 0:31:38.400
<v Speaker 1>uh that seemed to go off all three times you

0:31:38.440 --> 0:31:41.360
<v Speaker 1>called it. I know I was so dialed into Chris

0:31:41.400 --> 0:31:44.720
<v Speaker 1>connin last year. You were texted him, is this your

0:31:44.760 --> 0:31:47.280
<v Speaker 1>game this week? Yes? Uh? Then they got d D.

0:31:47.440 --> 0:31:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Westbrook and they got Keeling Cole. Then they brought in

0:31:50.080 --> 0:31:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Levisca Chennault Jr. Who I think might be the one

0:31:52.880 --> 0:31:54.680
<v Speaker 1>that wins this out because they need to get him

0:31:54.680 --> 0:31:57.000
<v Speaker 1>on the field, him with the ball in his hands especial.

0:31:57.080 --> 0:32:01.040
<v Speaker 1>It's I mean, Cordell Patterson like it. Let's go to

0:32:01.120 --> 0:32:04.400
<v Speaker 1>the rams and they're running back situation which looks very

0:32:04.600 --> 0:32:06.720
<v Speaker 1>very convoluted. Hey, I want no part of this either.

0:32:06.800 --> 0:32:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Cam Akers versus Darryl Henderson versus Malcolm Butler versus John Kelly,

0:32:10.520 --> 0:32:13.720
<v Speaker 1>and this is the main takeaway. The Rams never threw

0:32:13.760 --> 0:32:16.320
<v Speaker 1>to the running back last year thirty seven catches as

0:32:16.360 --> 0:32:19.520
<v Speaker 1>a whole. That's bad dead last. I'm out. I'm out

0:32:19.520 --> 0:32:20.920
<v Speaker 1>on this. We'll see what happens, but I'm not on

0:32:20.920 --> 0:32:23.360
<v Speaker 1>this battle. Yeah, and um, they've also said they're going

0:32:23.400 --> 0:32:24.960
<v Speaker 1>to use a hot hand approach, and just you know,

0:32:25.000 --> 0:32:27.000
<v Speaker 1>so fantasyaters may not know on a week to week

0:32:27.000 --> 0:32:29.720
<v Speaker 1>basis what to expect. All Right, let's motor through some

0:32:29.760 --> 0:32:32.400
<v Speaker 1>of the other training camp battles that were monitoring in

0:32:32.400 --> 0:32:36.240
<v Speaker 1>including the Kansas City Chief. Yeah, we we got DeAndre Washington,

0:32:36.320 --> 0:32:38.280
<v Speaker 1>who we've mentioned, but Darryll Williams at the end of

0:32:38.360 --> 0:32:41.280
<v Speaker 1>last season was really good, even even in the playoffs.

0:32:41.280 --> 0:32:43.640
<v Speaker 1>So I think I think that is something to monitor.

0:32:43.760 --> 0:32:46.480
<v Speaker 1>You think it's DeAndre, but we'll see how it plays out.

0:32:46.880 --> 0:32:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Is there much of a battle in San Francisco between

0:32:48.840 --> 0:32:52.480
<v Speaker 1>our he Morris and Tevin Tevin Coleman, Probably not considering

0:32:52.640 --> 0:32:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Mostard had two yards rushing on the same amount of

0:32:55.400 --> 0:32:58.920
<v Speaker 1>carries as Tevin Coleman. But Tevin Coleman is Shanahan's guy.

0:32:59.000 --> 0:33:01.120
<v Speaker 1>He did get hurt early on the year. I think

0:33:01.120 --> 0:33:02.640
<v Speaker 1>most of it is the guy they just resigned him.

0:33:02.680 --> 0:33:05.440
<v Speaker 1>But there there's some competition there. Alright, let's see what happens.

0:33:05.520 --> 0:33:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to the Chargers. We've got a potential quarterback controversy. Yeah,

0:33:09.880 --> 0:33:12.320
<v Speaker 1>they invested a good amount of money and really high

0:33:12.400 --> 0:33:16.400
<v Speaker 1>draft capital and Herbert. Uh. They brought in Tyrod Taylor.

0:33:16.640 --> 0:33:18.600
<v Speaker 1>I think Tyrod Taylor was supposed to be the stop

0:33:18.640 --> 0:33:21.840
<v Speaker 1>gap just in case. But Herbert's ready. I mean he

0:33:21.840 --> 0:33:24.960
<v Speaker 1>he could, he could take it over early. Okay, Green Bay.

0:33:25.040 --> 0:33:27.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that there's really competition at that number

0:33:27.680 --> 0:33:29.960
<v Speaker 1>two receiver spot. I thought you're gonna say Rogers and

0:33:30.000 --> 0:33:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Love right, it'd be delicious. No, not really. Devin Funcius

0:33:37.600 --> 0:33:39.720
<v Speaker 1>was supposed to have some kind of competition for the

0:33:39.800 --> 0:33:42.200
<v Speaker 1>number two wide receiver roles is. Of course, Davante Adams

0:33:42.240 --> 0:33:43.600
<v Speaker 1>is locked in the number one, but it should be

0:33:43.600 --> 0:33:47.840
<v Speaker 1>alms Ard over marquees of Baldiscandling again. But we'll see. Okay, well,

0:33:47.920 --> 0:33:50.360
<v Speaker 1>let's go to Miami. This is Do you believe the

0:33:50.400 --> 0:33:52.840
<v Speaker 1>two is gonna end up getting the week one? He's

0:33:52.840 --> 0:33:55.680
<v Speaker 1>completely cleared. I don't know, though, It's it's one of

0:33:55.720 --> 0:33:57.440
<v Speaker 1>those things I was hoping for too and not to

0:33:57.640 --> 0:34:00.440
<v Speaker 1>because with Fitzpatrick we kind of know what we're But

0:34:00.600 --> 0:34:03.640
<v Speaker 1>if two is in there, I might I might have

0:34:03.680 --> 0:34:05.840
<v Speaker 1>some questions about the wide receivers, but I think it's

0:34:05.880 --> 0:34:08.400
<v Speaker 1>a legitimate battle now that he's completely ready to go,

0:34:08.560 --> 0:34:11.399
<v Speaker 1>and our finding final training camp battle be San Francisco

0:34:11.520 --> 0:34:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Deebo Samuel is gonna miss at least the start of

0:34:14.400 --> 0:34:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the season, and foot injuries on wide receivers bad deal

0:34:17.760 --> 0:34:21.200
<v Speaker 1>missing could could go for quite a while. What's shaping

0:34:21.280 --> 0:34:23.919
<v Speaker 1>up in terms of training camp battles for the Niners. Yeah,

0:34:23.920 --> 0:34:25.840
<v Speaker 1>this is really a battle for temporary number one, but

0:34:25.880 --> 0:34:29.160
<v Speaker 1>permanent number two. And despite being a rookie, Brandon and

0:34:29.200 --> 0:34:32.360
<v Speaker 1>you probably the top wide receiver option in the in

0:34:32.400 --> 0:34:34.840
<v Speaker 1>the eyes of the fantasy football community right now, but

0:34:34.880 --> 0:34:38.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm targeting Kendrick Borne instead. Only saw six targets twice

0:34:38.800 --> 0:34:40.720
<v Speaker 1>last year, but in those two games, he had forty

0:34:40.719 --> 0:34:43.279
<v Speaker 1>plus yards in a touchdown in each. But don't don't

0:34:43.280 --> 0:34:45.520
<v Speaker 1>fall in love with any San Francisco wide out as

0:34:45.560 --> 0:34:48.120
<v Speaker 1>a whole. They averaged nine and a half receptions per

0:34:48.160 --> 0:34:51.040
<v Speaker 1>game last year. They just run, run, run, Well, you know,

0:34:51.320 --> 0:34:55.160
<v Speaker 1>the difference might be they can pass this year. They

0:34:55.160 --> 0:34:57.600
<v Speaker 1>have so much more talent at wide receiver, so much

0:34:57.600 --> 0:35:00.480
<v Speaker 1>more talent outside of George Kittle now that maybe they

0:35:00.480 --> 0:35:05.160
<v Speaker 1>will pass more. Yeah. Absolutely, that's a training camp battle

0:35:05.160 --> 0:35:07.200
<v Speaker 1>that we are going to watch as well, and our

0:35:07.280 --> 0:35:10.000
<v Speaker 1>final one that we'll talk about here when we come back.

0:35:10.960 --> 0:35:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Dynasty and Empire League players, Let's go through the rookie

0:35:14.480 --> 0:35:17.720
<v Speaker 1>drafts and figure out who is being taken too high,

0:35:17.880 --> 0:35:20.560
<v Speaker 1>too low, and just right. And if you've ever wanted

0:35:20.560 --> 0:35:23.719
<v Speaker 1>to play the Guillotine League, the exciting new format where

0:35:23.719 --> 0:35:26.200
<v Speaker 1>every week the low team gets chopped off from the

0:35:26.280 --> 0:35:28.719
<v Speaker 1>league and older players go to the waiver wire, you

0:35:28.760 --> 0:35:32.080
<v Speaker 1>can go to Guillotine leagues dot com join a contest

0:35:32.120 --> 0:35:35.200
<v Speaker 1>to play for whatever amount of prizing you're comfortable with.

0:35:35.480 --> 0:35:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Joining Guillotine League now at Guillotine leagues dot com. Fantasy

0:35:38.880 --> 0:35:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Football Weekly, Returns and Moments. Welcome back to Fantasy Football Weekly.

0:35:51.920 --> 0:35:54.960
<v Speaker 1>I'll charting with you Scott Fish, Brian Johnson getting you

0:35:55.120 --> 0:35:59.000
<v Speaker 1>ready for fantasy drafts. Still a little early for most

0:35:59.040 --> 0:36:01.720
<v Speaker 1>of us back. And then there's all the COVID stuff.

0:36:01.719 --> 0:36:03.319
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna get to that later in the show. All

0:36:03.360 --> 0:36:05.200
<v Speaker 1>the things that you need to be thinking about to

0:36:05.239 --> 0:36:09.680
<v Speaker 1>get your league ready. For the inevitable. It's gonna happen.

0:36:09.920 --> 0:36:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Guys are gonna get COVID season might end earlier, be interrupted.

0:36:13.960 --> 0:36:15.799
<v Speaker 1>We'll tell you all the things you need to know

0:36:16.360 --> 0:36:21.160
<v Speaker 1>a little later in the show. Next. Now, let's look

0:36:21.280 --> 0:36:25.480
<v Speaker 1>at the average draft position for the rookies across the

0:36:25.760 --> 0:36:29.200
<v Speaker 1>across America, where they're being drafted, and whether or not

0:36:29.280 --> 0:36:33.120
<v Speaker 1>you think America's got it right. So to set the table,

0:36:33.160 --> 0:36:37.720
<v Speaker 1>these are PPR leagues one quarterback leagues, and the first

0:36:37.719 --> 0:36:41.920
<v Speaker 1>pick overall is Clyde Edwards Hilaire Scott. Do you believe

0:36:42.000 --> 0:36:44.840
<v Speaker 1>this is the right spot for him? I think it is.

0:36:44.920 --> 0:36:47.200
<v Speaker 1>And and if you know me, I I'm usually in

0:36:47.200 --> 0:36:50.960
<v Speaker 1>a wit now mode usually, so the recent news that

0:36:51.040 --> 0:36:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Damian Williams sure helps helps that within by the number

0:36:54.800 --> 0:36:58.160
<v Speaker 1>one ranking, um, and I don't think Marilyn Mack is

0:36:58.200 --> 0:37:00.440
<v Speaker 1>a slouch either, even though I think Jonathan Taylor is

0:37:00.880 --> 0:37:03.520
<v Speaker 1>just so much better. I think Marlon Max is gonna

0:37:03.560 --> 0:37:05.520
<v Speaker 1>stick around there, So I'm I'm on board with Hilayer

0:37:05.560 --> 0:37:09.040
<v Speaker 1>at one. Okay, let's go to pick number two. By

0:37:09.160 --> 0:37:13.920
<v Speaker 1>your ADP world, You're selecting Jonathan Taylor number two. Brian,

0:37:13.960 --> 0:37:16.359
<v Speaker 1>do you feel like that is the right spot for him.

0:37:16.400 --> 0:37:19.279
<v Speaker 1>Too high? Yeah, it is the right spot. I do.

0:37:19.560 --> 0:37:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Marlon mack Is is an able runner, but Taylor is

0:37:22.200 --> 0:37:24.640
<v Speaker 1>probably the most talented running back in this class. And

0:37:25.280 --> 0:37:28.320
<v Speaker 1>if there's a spot that's not as good as the Chiefs,

0:37:28.320 --> 0:37:31.520
<v Speaker 1>it's probably the Colts with that offensive line. And uh so, yeah,

0:37:31.560 --> 0:37:33.759
<v Speaker 1>he's just in the right spot one day one one

0:37:33.800 --> 0:37:36.759
<v Speaker 1>be really Marlon mack is in the last year of

0:37:36.840 --> 0:37:39.680
<v Speaker 1>his rookie deal. So as we're thinking in Dynasty and

0:37:39.680 --> 0:37:43.799
<v Speaker 1>Empire League terms, remember he might be gone next next year,

0:37:43.840 --> 0:37:46.440
<v Speaker 1>and Naim Hines maybe as well, now that I think

0:37:46.480 --> 0:37:49.239
<v Speaker 1>about a year, Yeah, does he Okay, let's go with that.

0:37:49.640 --> 0:37:53.560
<v Speaker 1>The third pick overall that you are selecting is DeAndre

0:37:53.800 --> 0:37:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Swift to Detroit Is Scott? Is this too high? Too low?

0:37:58.080 --> 0:38:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Or about right? Uh? It's a out right, It's it's

0:38:01.040 --> 0:38:03.240
<v Speaker 1>not the three I would take it. He's he's probably

0:38:03.280 --> 0:38:07.720
<v Speaker 1>my four. But uh so I guess too high one.

0:38:08.320 --> 0:38:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Uh it's it's uh it's the Lions love to run,

0:38:12.360 --> 0:38:14.720
<v Speaker 1>but all their runners get hurt. So I've I've gotten

0:38:14.719 --> 0:38:17.439
<v Speaker 1>gun shy over the years. Their last like seven high

0:38:17.520 --> 0:38:20.960
<v Speaker 1>drafted running backs got hurt. It feels like. But No,

0:38:21.400 --> 0:38:23.400
<v Speaker 1>he's in a good spot if he can hold carry

0:38:23.440 --> 0:38:25.160
<v Speaker 1>on off, which he should. I think he should be

0:38:25.200 --> 0:38:28.359
<v Speaker 1>able to. It feels it feels right to me as

0:38:28.400 --> 0:38:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Swift is just he's an extraordinary talent and the shifting nous,

0:38:32.160 --> 0:38:35.439
<v Speaker 1>the ankle breaking moves. Wow, And at some point he's

0:38:35.480 --> 0:38:38.080
<v Speaker 1>just got to separate from Kerry On Johnson. Right, you'd

0:38:38.080 --> 0:38:41.000
<v Speaker 1>think so, he would think. So. Your fourth pick overall

0:38:41.200 --> 0:38:43.480
<v Speaker 1>is j K. Dobbins, and I think that's where it

0:38:43.480 --> 0:38:45.920
<v Speaker 1>starts to get a little bit more complicated pick. That's

0:38:45.920 --> 0:38:48.200
<v Speaker 1>your third back. All right. I'm gonna say too high

0:38:48.200 --> 0:38:51.520
<v Speaker 1>because I would have taken Dobbins over Swift for Empire

0:38:51.640 --> 0:38:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Dynasty purposes. I like Swift more this season, but uh,

0:38:54.960 --> 0:38:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Dobbins just built for that bell cow usage moving forward

0:38:58.040 --> 0:39:00.399
<v Speaker 1>in the makeup of that Baltimore Ravens team, they run

0:39:00.440 --> 0:39:05.480
<v Speaker 1>how you want the lead running back and not this year.

0:39:05.520 --> 0:39:08.000
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, sooner than later he will be as good

0:39:08.040 --> 0:39:10.160
<v Speaker 1>as mark Ingraman as j K. Dobtmins will take that

0:39:10.239 --> 0:39:13.320
<v Speaker 1>job by next year. All right. Your ADP on rookies

0:39:13.840 --> 0:39:19.040
<v Speaker 1>comes in at number five with cam Acres. Sure is

0:39:19.080 --> 0:39:22.440
<v Speaker 1>just too high? Too low? About right? That's about right?

0:39:22.520 --> 0:39:25.560
<v Speaker 1>That's how it usually goes in these one QB drafts.

0:39:25.640 --> 0:39:29.040
<v Speaker 1>He's he's uh, he's got the cheap rookie deal for that.

0:39:29.160 --> 0:39:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Los Angeles rams to excuse me, Yeah, Los Angeles ramsy,

0:39:32.360 --> 0:39:35.359
<v Speaker 1>And I thought I was thinking charge. Yeah. I don't

0:39:35.360 --> 0:39:37.680
<v Speaker 1>think Henderson is completely out of the way yet. I

0:39:37.680 --> 0:39:41.479
<v Speaker 1>I thought he was a really explosive guy, explicit plays.

0:39:41.520 --> 0:39:44.279
<v Speaker 1>I think he's gonna factor in. We're gonna get a

0:39:44.280 --> 0:39:47.600
<v Speaker 1>little more dirty as we go on here, But I

0:39:47.640 --> 0:39:49.919
<v Speaker 1>think it's fair. I think it's where he usually goes.

0:39:50.040 --> 0:39:52.759
<v Speaker 1>It's too high for cam Akers. This is a complicated

0:39:52.760 --> 0:39:55.160
<v Speaker 1>backfield with four different runners, and you're not gonna know

0:39:55.280 --> 0:39:57.360
<v Speaker 1>week in and week out who you can trust to

0:39:57.440 --> 0:40:00.120
<v Speaker 1>get playing time. And if the coaching staff doesn't, I

0:40:00.200 --> 0:40:02.240
<v Speaker 1>believe that they're going to use a hot hand approach,

0:40:03.080 --> 0:40:05.680
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be total guesswork. You know, the team doesn't

0:40:05.680 --> 0:40:07.800
<v Speaker 1>even know who's gonna get the most, the most carries

0:40:07.840 --> 0:40:12.160
<v Speaker 1>going into a game. Dog, you know, talking how much

0:40:12.200 --> 0:40:14.560
<v Speaker 1>he loves seeing what they did in San Francisco, which

0:40:14.560 --> 0:40:18.040
<v Speaker 1>but they're hot handed pro so I'm I'm not interested

0:40:18.040 --> 0:40:20.759
<v Speaker 1>in cam Akers. Pick number five is too high. Let's

0:40:20.760 --> 0:40:25.239
<v Speaker 1>go to selection number six. C D. Lamb is going

0:40:25.320 --> 0:40:27.800
<v Speaker 1>six and a DP. He is the Dallas wide receiver.

0:40:27.880 --> 0:40:30.279
<v Speaker 1>Is this too low? Too higher? Just right? I'll say

0:40:30.320 --> 0:40:32.440
<v Speaker 1>just right. When it comes to wide receivers, he should

0:40:32.440 --> 0:40:34.120
<v Speaker 1>be the first wide receiver off the board. I might

0:40:34.120 --> 0:40:36.239
<v Speaker 1>take him over Cam Akers at five, but I'll say

0:40:36.280 --> 0:40:38.040
<v Speaker 1>just right here, he should have been the first wide

0:40:38.040 --> 0:40:40.400
<v Speaker 1>receiver taken in reality football, I can't believe the Raiders

0:40:40.400 --> 0:40:42.640
<v Speaker 1>and the Broncos did not take Ceedee Lamb, who had

0:40:42.680 --> 0:40:46.200
<v Speaker 1>thirty three touchdowns over his three seasons as an Oklahoma Sooner,

0:40:46.560 --> 0:40:49.000
<v Speaker 1>never dropped a pass of twenty plus yards in those

0:40:49.000 --> 0:40:52.720
<v Speaker 1>three seasons, forced a mistackle on overt of his receptions

0:40:52.800 --> 0:40:55.120
<v Speaker 1>last year. It's just a crowded wide receiver room though

0:40:55.120 --> 0:40:57.480
<v Speaker 1>in Dallas right now. But I love the long term

0:40:57.520 --> 0:41:00.640
<v Speaker 1>prospects from I do too, and I'm just I believe

0:41:00.680 --> 0:41:02.560
<v Speaker 1>this was too low for all the reasons you just mentioned.

0:41:02.560 --> 0:41:06.120
<v Speaker 1>I would yeah, he was my wide receiver one as well.

0:41:06.200 --> 0:41:08.160
<v Speaker 1>He's the best. I think he's the best receiver out

0:41:08.200 --> 0:41:10.759
<v Speaker 1>of a deep deep, deep deep receiver class. I think

0:41:10.800 --> 0:41:13.319
<v Speaker 1>he should be going earlier than this, even though he

0:41:13.400 --> 0:41:16.280
<v Speaker 1>is in a crowded spot with receivers who probably aren't

0:41:16.280 --> 0:41:20.720
<v Speaker 1>going anywhere in Dallas. Next your a DP for rookies,

0:41:21.600 --> 0:41:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Jerry Judy going seventh to Denver. Do you feel like

0:41:25.560 --> 0:41:28.400
<v Speaker 1>that's about right? J are too low, Scott, he was

0:41:28.480 --> 0:41:31.239
<v Speaker 1>my wide receiver too, And and I just don't know

0:41:31.280 --> 0:41:33.080
<v Speaker 1>that the immediate production is going to be there. You

0:41:33.160 --> 0:41:37.440
<v Speaker 1>gotta really trust and Drew Lock but also Cortland's sons.

0:41:37.440 --> 0:41:40.360
<v Speaker 1>There no fans there. They grabbed. They got Albert, Oh

0:41:40.440 --> 0:41:44.399
<v Speaker 1>they have. They also got kJ Hammler, Tim Patrick's coming back.

0:41:44.400 --> 0:41:47.319
<v Speaker 1>How they have so many, so many mouths to feed there.

0:41:47.440 --> 0:41:50.719
<v Speaker 1>I know that's super cliche, but I think there are

0:41:50.719 --> 0:41:53.239
<v Speaker 1>guys going after Judy on this list that are going

0:41:53.280 --> 0:41:57.120
<v Speaker 1>to have, you know, similar to more production and a

0:41:57.160 --> 0:41:59.080
<v Speaker 1>little bit higher upside in the next couple of years.

0:41:59.120 --> 0:42:01.920
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk about those guys potentially right now. And I'm

0:42:02.000 --> 0:42:03.879
<v Speaker 1>kind of with you on this, including the next guy,

0:42:04.360 --> 0:42:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Jalen reagor At from Philadelphia is going eighth by your

0:42:08.680 --> 0:42:12.279
<v Speaker 1>a DP ravage draft position, Brian, Is that about right? Yeah?

0:42:12.320 --> 0:42:15.120
<v Speaker 1>I think it's about right. And speaking of crowded wide

0:42:15.120 --> 0:42:17.520
<v Speaker 1>receiver rooms in Dallas, I'm pretty sure they converted the

0:42:17.560 --> 0:42:20.839
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver room in Philly to like a dog park

0:42:20.920 --> 0:42:24.840
<v Speaker 1>or something. Rigor walks in is like the wide receiver

0:42:24.960 --> 0:42:26.719
<v Speaker 1>one essentially is if you take out the tight ends.

0:42:26.760 --> 0:42:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Of course. So not not a huge guy five ten,

0:42:29.520 --> 0:42:33.720
<v Speaker 1>two oh five, but lightning fast had awful quarterbacking throughout college.

0:42:33.719 --> 0:42:35.720
<v Speaker 1>So you can't glean from too much from his numbers,

0:42:35.760 --> 0:42:38.160
<v Speaker 1>but uh, he probably he could be the highest producing

0:42:38.239 --> 0:42:43.319
<v Speaker 1>rookie wide receiver this year Jeffreys play. So yeah, absolutely,

0:42:43.320 --> 0:42:45.480
<v Speaker 1>I think Regor is going too low at number eight.

0:42:45.480 --> 0:42:48.760
<v Speaker 1>He walks in he could be the noble one receiver

0:42:48.800 --> 0:42:51.600
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver and on day one, opening Day, that's a

0:42:51.640 --> 0:42:54.640
<v Speaker 1>possibility for Jalen Reagor. And were it not for the

0:42:54.800 --> 0:42:56.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, the chaos of this preseason, I think that

0:42:56.360 --> 0:42:59.560
<v Speaker 1>would be the case. All Right, your next rookie off

0:42:59.560 --> 0:43:03.120
<v Speaker 1>the board in Dynasty Empire Drafts by ADP selection number nine,

0:43:03.200 --> 0:43:05.719
<v Speaker 1>justin Jefferson. Does this feel right? Scott? I know this

0:43:05.840 --> 0:43:08.120
<v Speaker 1>is Dynasty Empire, but I think this is your rookie

0:43:08.120 --> 0:43:11.680
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver one for his first season. I think he's

0:43:11.719 --> 0:43:15.040
<v Speaker 1>the best rookie receiver this season just because of opportunity.

0:43:15.080 --> 0:43:16.759
<v Speaker 1>I think he's gonna see a ton of targets I

0:43:16.760 --> 0:43:18.960
<v Speaker 1>think he's made for what what the Vikings want to do,

0:43:19.000 --> 0:43:22.840
<v Speaker 1>and man, Spielman and Zimmer got excited. I'm sure you

0:43:22.880 --> 0:43:25.320
<v Speaker 1>saw that video when they got to draft him. Yeah,

0:43:25.360 --> 0:43:30.040
<v Speaker 1>and Justin Jefferson highly productive in college, so I think

0:43:30.280 --> 0:43:32.279
<v Speaker 1>he is. He is as much as anybody in this

0:43:32.360 --> 0:43:35.279
<v Speaker 1>draft ready to walk in and be somebody that can

0:43:35.360 --> 0:43:38.600
<v Speaker 1>assimilate to the NFL faster than others. This is he's

0:43:38.640 --> 0:43:41.280
<v Speaker 1>too low at at pick number nine in my opinion,

0:43:42.719 --> 0:43:45.920
<v Speaker 1>by your ADP number ten. Key Shawn Vaughan from Tampa

0:43:46.000 --> 0:43:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Bay going tenth, Brian, is that too high now? I

0:43:49.640 --> 0:43:51.640
<v Speaker 1>think it's just about right. All the big name running

0:43:51.680 --> 0:43:53.759
<v Speaker 1>backs and big name wide receivers are gone, so you

0:43:54.000 --> 0:43:55.799
<v Speaker 1>take a shot here on Vaughan, who you hope gets

0:43:55.840 --> 0:43:57.880
<v Speaker 1>the lead job in Tampa Bay. I don't know how long,

0:43:57.960 --> 0:43:59.520
<v Speaker 1>if he can keep it for a year in and

0:43:59.600 --> 0:44:01.680
<v Speaker 1>year out. Let leave this one stat for Vaughan who

0:44:01.719 --> 0:44:04.719
<v Speaker 1>went to Vanderbilt, who finished as a team with the

0:44:04.719 --> 0:44:07.000
<v Speaker 1>lowest run blocking grade as a unit according to Pro

0:44:07.040 --> 0:44:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Football Focus. Even though that happened, Vaughan topped a thousand

0:44:10.560 --> 0:44:13.080
<v Speaker 1>yards unless than two carries. That's pretty impressive. That is

0:44:13.080 --> 0:44:15.399
<v Speaker 1>pretty impressive. Um, I feel like this is a little

0:44:15.400 --> 0:44:17.040
<v Speaker 1>bit too high when I can't even tell you if

0:44:17.080 --> 0:44:18.960
<v Speaker 1>he's the best running back on his team and if

0:44:18.960 --> 0:44:21.279
<v Speaker 1>he can beat out when you can't for sure beat

0:44:21.280 --> 0:44:23.000
<v Speaker 1>out Ronald Jones. I'm not sure how good you are

0:44:24.040 --> 0:44:26.040
<v Speaker 1>if you're running back hungry though this you gotta take

0:44:26.040 --> 0:44:28.839
<v Speaker 1>a shot here on Vaughan. All right, Your ADP pick

0:44:28.920 --> 0:44:32.480
<v Speaker 1>number eleven is Henry Ruggs from your Las Vegas Raiders.

0:44:32.520 --> 0:44:35.960
<v Speaker 1>Too high, too lower? Just right? Ah Man, It's tough

0:44:36.000 --> 0:44:38.360
<v Speaker 1>for me because there's a long history of super fast

0:44:38.400 --> 0:44:41.880
<v Speaker 1>guys that go top ten, the smaller super fast guys

0:44:41.920 --> 0:44:44.480
<v Speaker 1>that just do not make it. They they just do

0:44:44.600 --> 0:44:47.160
<v Speaker 1>not pan out. But I think this guy is actually

0:44:47.239 --> 0:44:50.239
<v Speaker 1>pretty good. And in that offense, he's gonna have room.

0:44:50.840 --> 0:44:53.000
<v Speaker 1>He's got all the opportunity in the world. It's it's

0:44:53.040 --> 0:44:56.640
<v Speaker 1>Tyrell and it's him, and it's Hunter Renfrell. I mean,

0:44:56.760 --> 0:44:58.319
<v Speaker 1>he's got room. He's got room to get a lot

0:44:58.320 --> 0:45:00.799
<v Speaker 1>of targets. They he'll get playing to time, that's for sure.

0:45:01.400 --> 0:45:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Henry Ruggs about right at number eleven. Lastly, and briefly,

0:45:05.200 --> 0:45:07.719
<v Speaker 1>Joe Burrow, first player taking in the draft, going at

0:45:07.719 --> 0:45:10.480
<v Speaker 1>the end of the first round in Dynasty and Empire draphs,

0:45:10.840 --> 0:45:12.879
<v Speaker 1>you had one quarterback league. That's about right. The real

0:45:12.960 --> 0:45:14.799
<v Speaker 1>question is if you're you're in a super flex league

0:45:14.800 --> 0:45:16.040
<v Speaker 1>and I know we're all playing a bunch, are you

0:45:16.080 --> 0:45:19.920
<v Speaker 1>taking Burrow first overall? Are you're going with h? And Uh?

0:45:20.480 --> 0:45:22.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what I would do at this exact moment.

0:45:22.680 --> 0:45:24.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure. But in the one quarterback league, you

0:45:24.719 --> 0:45:26.920
<v Speaker 1>still got to take him over to of course, and uh,

0:45:27.200 --> 0:45:29.080
<v Speaker 1>since he's gonna have a pretty fun team when it

0:45:29.080 --> 0:45:31.399
<v Speaker 1>comes to scorning. Fantasy points is here. If you've got

0:45:31.440 --> 0:45:34.360
<v Speaker 1>seventeen players who want to try a guillotine league, go

0:45:34.400 --> 0:45:37.200
<v Speaker 1>to Guillotine leagues dot com and join one of our

0:45:37.360 --> 0:45:40.480
<v Speaker 1>public league sorry private leagues where you can play with

0:45:40.560 --> 0:45:54.240
<v Speaker 1>your friends. Guillotine leagues dot com. Welcome back Fantasy Football

0:45:54.320 --> 0:45:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Weekly here number twenty six. Paul Charge and Scott Fish

0:45:58.120 --> 0:46:02.319
<v Speaker 1>and Brian Johnson with you. Last segment, we started the

0:46:02.360 --> 0:46:08.920
<v Speaker 1>first round of your Dynasty Empire Rookie drafts. Your ADP America.

0:46:09.440 --> 0:46:11.680
<v Speaker 1>The order you're taking every one of the players in

0:46:11.880 --> 0:46:14.120
<v Speaker 1>We've evaluated if you're getting it right or you're getting

0:46:14.120 --> 0:46:16.680
<v Speaker 1>it wrong. Now we go to round two, where it

0:46:16.680 --> 0:46:20.080
<v Speaker 1>gets a lot sketchier and the names aren't quite as familiar.

0:46:20.600 --> 0:46:23.359
<v Speaker 1>But this is where you're gonna unearth some of your

0:46:23.400 --> 0:46:28.799
<v Speaker 1>great sleepers. I'll bragg for just a minute. This is

0:46:28.800 --> 0:46:32.719
<v Speaker 1>where I got Michael Thomas, you die all the clock

0:46:32.800 --> 0:46:35.920
<v Speaker 1>back five years ago. He was a second round pick

0:46:35.920 --> 0:46:38.480
<v Speaker 1>in my dynasty league. I got Robbed Gronkowski the third

0:46:38.520 --> 0:46:41.759
<v Speaker 1>round of a dynasty Yeah, there, there there, And I

0:46:41.840 --> 0:46:46.120
<v Speaker 1>love this second round too. It's deepest. I really think

0:46:46.160 --> 0:46:50.480
<v Speaker 1>this is the deepest fantasy draft we've ever had. I've

0:46:50.520 --> 0:46:54.960
<v Speaker 1>been doing this professionally since this is the best and

0:46:55.080 --> 0:46:57.319
<v Speaker 1>deepest draft we've had, so the second round still got

0:46:57.320 --> 0:47:00.320
<v Speaker 1>a ton of value. We begin with t Hey Agins

0:47:00.400 --> 0:47:03.319
<v Speaker 1>in Cincinnati. Is it is the first big of the

0:47:03.320 --> 0:47:05.600
<v Speaker 1>second round. Scott. Is he too high, too low? Or

0:47:05.640 --> 0:47:08.920
<v Speaker 1>just right? He's probably he's a little too high for me.

0:47:08.960 --> 0:47:11.319
<v Speaker 1>I know people love him, uh they are just a

0:47:11.320 --> 0:47:13.520
<v Speaker 1>bunch of guys in this round I like more than him.

0:47:13.520 --> 0:47:15.960
<v Speaker 1>He's he's a big six ft four guy to replace

0:47:16.000 --> 0:47:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the six ft four, two hundred fifteen pound guy to

0:47:18.040 --> 0:47:21.040
<v Speaker 1>replace the six ft four, two fifteen pound thirty two

0:47:21.080 --> 0:47:23.440
<v Speaker 1>year old aj Green. That's right, and isn't that the

0:47:23.520 --> 0:47:26.120
<v Speaker 1>value that he brings. That's I mean to me, the

0:47:26.160 --> 0:47:29.200
<v Speaker 1>whole point on Tie Higgins isn't this year. It's all

0:47:29.239 --> 0:47:31.960
<v Speaker 1>about the probability that a j Green is somewhere else

0:47:32.040 --> 0:47:35.200
<v Speaker 1>in the future and he becomes the de facto number one.

0:47:35.239 --> 0:47:37.520
<v Speaker 1>I like Tyler Boyd and I respect him, but I

0:47:37.560 --> 0:47:41.239
<v Speaker 1>don't think he's I think it's one receiver guy. Tie

0:47:41.320 --> 0:47:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Higgins could be him in two years, ultra productive at

0:47:45.600 --> 0:47:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Clemson by your average draft position. The next rookie to

0:47:49.080 --> 0:47:52.040
<v Speaker 1>go second pick of the second round, Denzel Mims. Brian,

0:47:52.160 --> 0:47:54.200
<v Speaker 1>do you think this is just right? No, I think

0:47:54.239 --> 0:47:57.800
<v Speaker 1>he should have been a little higher over Higgins. Personally.

0:47:58.160 --> 0:48:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Mims coming out of Bailor Love the side, six three pounds, uh,

0:48:03.160 --> 0:48:05.600
<v Speaker 1>could very well be the best boundary receiver on the

0:48:05.680 --> 0:48:08.719
<v Speaker 1>Jets right now. I'm not convinced Broshot Perryman is the

0:48:08.760 --> 0:48:11.759
<v Speaker 1>answer one year deal to He's on a one year deal.

0:48:12.040 --> 0:48:14.359
<v Speaker 1>I think Jamison Crowders He's a ton of targets this year,

0:48:14.400 --> 0:48:17.360
<v Speaker 1>but I like Mims to have a role, a significant

0:48:17.440 --> 0:48:19.600
<v Speaker 1>role this year and moving forward. He could be a

0:48:19.640 --> 0:48:22.520
<v Speaker 1>stud alright. The third pick of the second round by

0:48:22.560 --> 0:48:26.440
<v Speaker 1>your average draft position is Brandon Ayouk yep, who goes

0:48:26.480 --> 0:48:28.440
<v Speaker 1>to the Niners. What do you think? Too high? Too low?

0:48:28.520 --> 0:48:30.839
<v Speaker 1>Just right? I think it's fair, especially considering this year.

0:48:30.920 --> 0:48:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Deebo is gonna start out on the on the probably

0:48:33.960 --> 0:48:36.640
<v Speaker 1>on the pup. We'll see. I think it's I think

0:48:36.680 --> 0:48:38.920
<v Speaker 1>it's all right. He could turn into the wide receiver

0:48:39.040 --> 0:48:42.120
<v Speaker 1>one there. But I still feel like that team runs

0:48:42.120 --> 0:48:44.680
<v Speaker 1>a ton It's Kittles team in the receiving game, and

0:48:45.440 --> 0:48:47.480
<v Speaker 1>I can see them drafting more wide receivers in the

0:48:47.480 --> 0:48:49.879
<v Speaker 1>coming years. It's okay, I think it's a little high

0:48:49.920 --> 0:48:52.359
<v Speaker 1>for me, all right, I'm kinda with you on that.

0:48:52.440 --> 0:48:55.120
<v Speaker 1>But again, I think San Francisto just got room to

0:48:55.120 --> 0:48:57.719
<v Speaker 1>pass opportunity, and he's got up. He walks right into

0:48:57.719 --> 0:48:59.680
<v Speaker 1>a starting role this year as a rookie, which is great.

0:49:00.080 --> 0:49:02.319
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to Indianapolis where pick number four of the

0:49:02.360 --> 0:49:05.200
<v Speaker 1>second round is Michael Pittman. Is this too high? Tool

0:49:05.200 --> 0:49:08.919
<v Speaker 1>oranges way too low? And he went way too low

0:49:08.960 --> 0:49:11.920
<v Speaker 1>in real football to over twelve hundred yards and eleven

0:49:11.960 --> 0:49:14.640
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns at USC last year. Caught a hundred and one

0:49:14.719 --> 0:49:18.319
<v Speaker 1>passes in college. That is unreal. Only three drops on

0:49:18.320 --> 0:49:20.920
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and thirty three targets last year, for reference,

0:49:21.040 --> 0:49:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Jerry Judy had seven drops on a hundred and eight

0:49:23.520 --> 0:49:27.239
<v Speaker 1>targets uh and ridiculous wingspan uh. In addition to the

0:49:27.280 --> 0:49:29.839
<v Speaker 1>size for Pittman of nearly eight inches, he's gonna he's

0:49:29.840 --> 0:49:31.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a beast for years to come. In Pittman

0:49:32.000 --> 0:49:35.080
<v Speaker 1>with the great body control and these lead big catches,

0:49:35.120 --> 0:49:38.239
<v Speaker 1>with the big body ah and the crowded room. He's

0:49:38.239 --> 0:49:41.440
<v Speaker 1>got the bloodline pedigree that Brian loves. He's got the

0:49:41.440 --> 0:49:44.600
<v Speaker 1>football player father. Absolutely. I hope he's got the quite

0:49:44.640 --> 0:49:47.160
<v Speaker 1>the biceps that that dad had. I don't think you

0:49:47.200 --> 0:49:49.520
<v Speaker 1>want those a wide receiver. Didn't work out well for

0:49:49.600 --> 0:49:55.120
<v Speaker 1>David Boston. But yeah, David. But I think we all remember,

0:49:55.400 --> 0:49:59.000
<v Speaker 1>or at least you get the poster. I've seen it in.

0:49:59.280 --> 0:50:02.520
<v Speaker 1>That's right. Um. One last thing in Michael Pittman, I

0:50:02.520 --> 0:50:05.799
<v Speaker 1>think the big question is who's his quarterback next year?

0:50:06.560 --> 0:50:09.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, so to me, that's the that's that's

0:50:09.600 --> 0:50:11.640
<v Speaker 1>the big X factor on Michael on Michael pitt The

0:50:11.640 --> 0:50:13.240
<v Speaker 1>next guy in the last time of the same question,

0:50:13.440 --> 0:50:16.080
<v Speaker 1>all right, and that's Brian Edwards, the new Las Vegas

0:50:16.239 --> 0:50:18.720
<v Speaker 1>d Yeah, I really like Brian Edwards. I like Rugs.

0:50:18.760 --> 0:50:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Tyrrell might be gone after this season. Uh, Tyro is

0:50:22.080 --> 0:50:23.920
<v Speaker 1>not very good. Yea and Renfro is going to be

0:50:23.960 --> 0:50:25.600
<v Speaker 1>in the slot if they get if they get a

0:50:25.640 --> 0:50:30.120
<v Speaker 1>franchise quarterback. I think Brian Edwards checks just about every box.

0:50:30.160 --> 0:50:32.719
<v Speaker 1>I think he could be a good big receiver for them.

0:50:32.840 --> 0:50:36.120
<v Speaker 1>We're going through Dynasty and Empire rookie drafts. This is

0:50:36.239 --> 0:50:39.520
<v Speaker 1>your average draft position, America. And whether or not you're

0:50:39.520 --> 0:50:42.520
<v Speaker 1>getting it right, and you're not getting it more wrong,

0:50:42.800 --> 0:50:46.360
<v Speaker 1>then you're getting it On this pick, the sixth selection

0:50:46.400 --> 0:50:49.680
<v Speaker 1>of the second round of Zack Moss. I'm gonna I'm

0:50:49.680 --> 0:50:51.919
<v Speaker 1>gonna end up talking about Moss a little bit later

0:50:51.960 --> 0:50:54.239
<v Speaker 1>in the show, so I'm not gonna steal. I'm not

0:50:54.239 --> 0:50:56.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna even spend any more time on him here, but

0:50:56.840 --> 0:51:00.399
<v Speaker 1>rest assured he's going too low. Definitely going too low.

0:51:00.400 --> 0:51:01.960
<v Speaker 1>And if you listen to our podcast over the last

0:51:01.960 --> 0:51:05.600
<v Speaker 1>few months, we've been praising Zack Moss practically every week. Uh,

0:51:05.680 --> 0:51:08.840
<v Speaker 1>he will get the eighteen carries at Frank goregat inside

0:51:08.840 --> 0:51:11.319
<v Speaker 1>the ten yard line. Last year, Devin Singletary had three

0:51:11.400 --> 0:51:13.840
<v Speaker 1>carries inside the ten. Those are all going to Zack Moss,

0:51:14.000 --> 0:51:16.120
<v Speaker 1>who is a five tool running back, by the way,

0:51:16.160 --> 0:51:18.399
<v Speaker 1>so we'll talk about him more like charge said, love

0:51:18.480 --> 0:51:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Zack Moss going way too low here, way too low.

0:51:20.600 --> 0:51:22.239
<v Speaker 1>It picks six. Let's go to pick seven of the

0:51:22.239 --> 0:51:27.360
<v Speaker 1>second round. Laviska chanlt a really really gifted athlete is

0:51:27.480 --> 0:51:29.600
<v Speaker 1>and you talk to you don't break my heart. So

0:51:30.440 --> 0:51:33.759
<v Speaker 1>you talk glowingly of him, a segment like I just

0:51:33.840 --> 0:51:37.520
<v Speaker 1>love watching them on the field. There's so they're highlight

0:51:37.560 --> 0:51:41.919
<v Speaker 1>reel material. I think he can grow into the wide

0:51:41.960 --> 0:51:46.920
<v Speaker 1>receiver to there with Chark and with Minshew growing us

0:51:46.920 --> 0:51:49.840
<v Speaker 1>pick seven of the second round to couple wide receivers

0:51:49.880 --> 0:51:52.399
<v Speaker 1>I like less than him, so I do feel it's

0:51:52.400 --> 0:51:58.719
<v Speaker 1>too low, alright, I agreed next to a Tagliabola is

0:51:58.920 --> 0:52:01.600
<v Speaker 1>and for the Dolphins, I think I butchered his name.

0:52:01.920 --> 0:52:07.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to correct you, that's right. I'm just

0:52:07.840 --> 0:52:11.600
<v Speaker 1>going at the draft, I had a doubt that, and

0:52:11.640 --> 0:52:13.279
<v Speaker 1>I haven't said his name were than a couple of

0:52:13.320 --> 0:52:16.600
<v Speaker 1>times since then. Alright, So at pick number eight of

0:52:16.640 --> 0:52:18.640
<v Speaker 1>the second round, too low, too high, or just right,

0:52:19.040 --> 0:52:21.719
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a little too low. He probably he

0:52:21.719 --> 0:52:23.520
<v Speaker 1>would have been the first overall pick if not for

0:52:23.560 --> 0:52:25.799
<v Speaker 1>the injury last year, and that doesn't seem to be

0:52:25.800 --> 0:52:27.200
<v Speaker 1>too much of a concern. So he's probably going a

0:52:27.200 --> 0:52:29.479
<v Speaker 1>little too low. And uh, you could make a case

0:52:29.520 --> 0:52:32.200
<v Speaker 1>for taking him over borrow if you're thinking long term

0:52:32.400 --> 0:52:34.399
<v Speaker 1>and not just for this year. But uh two has

0:52:34.400 --> 0:52:36.160
<v Speaker 1>got a bright future ahead of him, hopefully, and this

0:52:36.160 --> 0:52:38.120
<v Speaker 1>will probably you will look back and listen being like,

0:52:38.160 --> 0:52:40.360
<v Speaker 1>why didn't I draft to that? Yeah, because don't you

0:52:40.400 --> 0:52:42.960
<v Speaker 1>get that feeling? His weapons are so nice too, at

0:52:43.040 --> 0:52:48.920
<v Speaker 1>least for me and Dynasty President Williams. Second. Yeah, he

0:52:48.960 --> 0:52:50.719
<v Speaker 1>does have weapons around him. He's really in a good

0:52:50.719 --> 0:52:53.880
<v Speaker 1>spot to succeed offensive line aside, which they need to improve.

0:52:54.600 --> 0:52:57.480
<v Speaker 1>This the ninth selection in the second round by your

0:52:57.520 --> 0:53:02.040
<v Speaker 1>average draft position in Dynasty and Empire leagues. Antonio Gibson

0:53:02.880 --> 0:53:05.680
<v Speaker 1>from Washington, a guy that's flying under the radar in

0:53:05.719 --> 0:53:12.239
<v Speaker 1>a lot of leagues. Too high to right. Uh, I

0:53:12.280 --> 0:53:14.680
<v Speaker 1>think it's probably just right. I usually take him a

0:53:14.680 --> 0:53:17.160
<v Speaker 1>little higher just because I really like him. He's he

0:53:17.280 --> 0:53:19.839
<v Speaker 1>had so little production in college, but when he did

0:53:19.840 --> 0:53:23.319
<v Speaker 1>get the ball, he was really hyper effective with it. Uh.

0:53:23.360 --> 0:53:24.759
<v Speaker 1>And they didn't know if he was gonna be a

0:53:24.800 --> 0:53:26.560
<v Speaker 1>running back or a wide receiver. The only problem is

0:53:26.600 --> 0:53:28.879
<v Speaker 1>in Washington a lot of running backs, so maybe they'll

0:53:28.880 --> 0:53:30.920
<v Speaker 1>put them out of wide receiver a little bit because

0:53:30.960 --> 0:53:33.560
<v Speaker 1>they don't have a lot of those these jackknife guys,

0:53:33.680 --> 0:53:36.760
<v Speaker 1>jack of all trade guys when they almost ever seemed

0:53:36.800 --> 0:53:39.319
<v Speaker 1>to pan out from a fantasy. When they don't, they don't.

0:53:39.320 --> 0:53:42.560
<v Speaker 1>When they pop like they pop, when they don't, they don't.

0:53:42.600 --> 0:53:45.120
<v Speaker 1>He's not Alvin Camar. That's I don't think. I think

0:53:45.160 --> 0:53:47.000
<v Speaker 1>this is too high for Antonio Gibson, who to me

0:53:47.040 --> 0:53:49.960
<v Speaker 1>as a role player in that offense, and Chris Thompson

0:53:50.040 --> 0:53:53.400
<v Speaker 1>replacement and yeah, at best to Chris Thompson replacement, and

0:53:53.440 --> 0:53:55.680
<v Speaker 1>to me, that's not worthy of this selection in the

0:53:55.760 --> 0:53:58.239
<v Speaker 1>ninth pick of the second round. But the tenth pick

0:53:58.840 --> 0:54:02.880
<v Speaker 1>absolutely should be higher. And that's a J Dillon for

0:54:02.960 --> 0:54:06.919
<v Speaker 1>the Packers, especially when you start thinking about twenty one. Brian, Yeah,

0:54:06.920 --> 0:54:09.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm getting all the softballs here. A J Dillon going

0:54:09.560 --> 0:54:11.200
<v Speaker 1>way too low here. If there's anyone that you could

0:54:11.200 --> 0:54:13.200
<v Speaker 1>compare to Derrick Henry, he would be a J. Dillon.

0:54:13.480 --> 0:54:15.480
<v Speaker 1>He's the house, but uh we can call him a

0:54:15.480 --> 0:54:18.560
<v Speaker 1>mobile home because he can move to uh. Waiting at

0:54:18.680 --> 0:54:20.840
<v Speaker 1>seven at the combine, but he only recorded the highest

0:54:20.920 --> 0:54:23.560
<v Speaker 1>vertical leap among all running backs. That makes total sense,

0:54:24.520 --> 0:54:26.479
<v Speaker 1>and he ran a four or five three forty Clyde

0:54:26.560 --> 0:54:28.759
<v Speaker 1>Edwards Hilaire ran a four six. So there you go.

0:54:29.000 --> 0:54:31.879
<v Speaker 1>Dylan is gonna he's gonna vulture some touchdowns from Aaron

0:54:31.960 --> 0:54:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Jones this year. There's no denying that's this year. Now,

0:54:34.320 --> 0:54:37.040
<v Speaker 1>next year, Aaron Jones a free agent, and so is

0:54:37.080 --> 0:54:41.839
<v Speaker 1>Jamal Williams a bitter free agent. Yes, I mean there's

0:54:41.840 --> 0:54:44.239
<v Speaker 1>no guarantee. I don't think Williams makes a team this year.

0:54:44.280 --> 0:54:46.200
<v Speaker 1>That's not guaranteed. But yet next year's not probably not.

0:54:46.719 --> 0:54:49.720
<v Speaker 1>So there's there's a real path for a J. Dillon

0:54:49.760 --> 0:54:52.719
<v Speaker 1>to get a lot of a lot of work in

0:54:52.840 --> 0:54:56.560
<v Speaker 1>future seasons. And so everybody that's that's maybe down on him,

0:54:56.560 --> 0:54:58.959
<v Speaker 1>I think they're not just not thinking about years beyond

0:54:59.000 --> 0:55:01.240
<v Speaker 1>this line. This is what happened into the second late second,

0:55:01.320 --> 0:55:05.719
<v Speaker 1>especially a rookie drafts. You're playing one the eleventh pick

0:55:05.760 --> 0:55:08.279
<v Speaker 1>of the second round by your average draft position in

0:55:08.360 --> 0:55:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Dynasty and Empire leagues. Is Derrington Evans from Tennessee. Is

0:55:12.680 --> 0:55:14.839
<v Speaker 1>this the right spot for him? I think he's too

0:55:14.920 --> 0:55:17.600
<v Speaker 1>high now I think I think now that Derrick Henry

0:55:17.600 --> 0:55:20.560
<v Speaker 1>has resigned, I think he's too high Now. I think

0:55:20.560 --> 0:55:23.920
<v Speaker 1>he would have been fair at that price. Now you're

0:55:23.920 --> 0:55:26.200
<v Speaker 1>buying a backup for a guy who probably won't come

0:55:26.239 --> 0:55:28.919
<v Speaker 1>off the field, not now. And then the last guy

0:55:28.960 --> 0:55:31.640
<v Speaker 1>that will end up talking about in this segment Chase

0:55:31.719 --> 0:55:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Claypool from Tennessee. He's the wide receiver they drafted and

0:55:36.200 --> 0:55:38.840
<v Speaker 1>he is the last selection of the second round. Is

0:55:38.880 --> 0:55:41.640
<v Speaker 1>this feel about right for him? Brian, It's a little

0:55:41.719 --> 0:55:43.120
<v Speaker 1>high for me. I think I would look at some

0:55:43.160 --> 0:55:45.320
<v Speaker 1>of the some of the other running backs still around,

0:55:45.360 --> 0:55:48.360
<v Speaker 1>like you know, Benjamin Lamacoll Porene, or even like Jalen Hurts,

0:55:48.360 --> 0:55:50.919
<v Speaker 1>a long term quarterback that intrigues me. But Claypool looks

0:55:50.960 --> 0:55:53.640
<v Speaker 1>like an intriguing PROSPECTS six four. He's got sized, but

0:55:53.719 --> 0:55:57.520
<v Speaker 1>I think out out in order Dame. He did have

0:55:57.560 --> 0:56:00.319
<v Speaker 1>thirteen touchdowns last year, but I just need to see

0:56:00.360 --> 0:56:02.319
<v Speaker 1>more from him before I'm taking him with the last

0:56:02.600 --> 0:56:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh was better at drafting and grooming wide receivers. They

0:56:06.640 --> 0:56:10.040
<v Speaker 1>can never identify a good receiver, I believe, and I

0:56:12.640 --> 0:56:15.600
<v Speaker 1>judice Smith Shuster's coming up to free agency, I think

0:56:15.640 --> 0:56:18.239
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna walk. I don't think they're going to resign him,

0:56:18.239 --> 0:56:20.120
<v Speaker 1>and I think they're gonna go with the other young

0:56:20.160 --> 0:56:25.640
<v Speaker 1>receivers they have, including James Washington and Johnson. Johnson is

0:56:25.640 --> 0:56:27.919
<v Speaker 1>really good. I think they're gonna go ahead with those

0:56:27.920 --> 0:56:30.560
<v Speaker 1>guys next year. So I like Chase Claypool and I

0:56:30.600 --> 0:56:32.319
<v Speaker 1>think there's going to be a spot for him on

0:56:32.360 --> 0:56:35.319
<v Speaker 1>this roster in one. So I do think this is

0:56:35.320 --> 0:56:37.239
<v Speaker 1>a good spot for him. Off the top of my head,

0:56:37.320 --> 0:56:40.680
<v Speaker 1>names omitted that that could be second round picks, Lynn

0:56:40.680 --> 0:56:47.359
<v Speaker 1>Bowden Raids maybe right, another player without a position. Those

0:56:47.360 --> 0:56:51.600
<v Speaker 1>guys so rarely end up being meaningful Fantasy contributors. And

0:56:51.840 --> 0:56:55.120
<v Speaker 1>I hear good things about Joshua Kelly who's on the Chargers.

0:56:55.200 --> 0:57:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Now I'm interested in him. Uh and from the Ricky

0:57:00.080 --> 0:57:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Scouting portfolio really knows his stuff, really likes Joshua Kelly,

0:57:03.600 --> 0:57:06.879
<v Speaker 1>and I'll listen to Matt Waldman has to say. And

0:57:07.120 --> 0:57:09.880
<v Speaker 1>I think he might flat out Justin Jackson. He might

0:57:09.920 --> 0:57:12.040
<v Speaker 1>beat out Justin Jackson, and there's I think there's a

0:57:12.080 --> 0:57:14.799
<v Speaker 1>real chance he'll do that. But Austin Ekeler, you guys

0:57:14.800 --> 0:57:17.800
<v Speaker 1>saw the photo of him this week. The shirtless photo. Yeah.

0:57:17.880 --> 0:57:21.280
<v Speaker 1>He was doing those video last year too. He's but yeah,

0:57:21.360 --> 0:57:24.040
<v Speaker 1>now he looks even more. He's so ripped and it

0:57:24.160 --> 0:57:28.160
<v Speaker 1>kills me. When people describe Austin Ekelers a scatback, you know,

0:57:28.320 --> 0:57:31.040
<v Speaker 1>like he's this little guy who can't run between tackles,

0:57:31.560 --> 0:57:34.880
<v Speaker 1>You're nuts, And dude is just power. He is a

0:57:34.920 --> 0:57:37.680
<v Speaker 1>scat back. He leaves defenders scattered all over the field.

0:57:37.920 --> 0:57:41.600
<v Speaker 1>It leaves him scatting their pants. That's that's what happens.

0:57:41.640 --> 0:57:44.320
<v Speaker 1>I believe when we come back a game, we like

0:57:44.440 --> 0:57:47.600
<v Speaker 1>to call three tough questions. This is where you get

0:57:47.640 --> 0:57:50.640
<v Speaker 1>to play long see if you can go three and

0:57:50.840 --> 0:57:53.520
<v Speaker 1>oh with our panel of experts. Also, if you would

0:57:53.520 --> 0:57:54.920
<v Speaker 1>like my teaching, you can get it for free at

0:57:54.920 --> 0:57:58.439
<v Speaker 1>Guillotine leagues dot com. Guillotine leagues dot com. I've got

0:57:58.440 --> 0:58:02.240
<v Speaker 1>a wide variety of T shirts, shirts teacher, We don't

0:58:02.240 --> 0:58:05.760
<v Speaker 1>tell the cheet cheats for you. To help you out

0:58:05.880 --> 0:58:09.800
<v Speaker 1>in your forthcoming drafts and auctions, go to Guillotine leagues

0:58:09.960 --> 0:58:12.600
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Paul Church and Scott Fish, Brian Johnson back

0:58:12.680 --> 0:58:37.240
<v Speaker 1>in moments. It's officially Fantasy football season. Fantasy Football Weekly

0:58:37.560 --> 0:58:42.360
<v Speaker 1>is back. Paul Church, Scott fish, Brian Johnson with you.

0:58:42.680 --> 0:58:46.240
<v Speaker 1>We've invented the new Chee cheet T shirt. I set

0:58:46.320 --> 0:58:50.560
<v Speaker 1>up a T shirt shop. While we're exactly, get my

0:58:50.640 --> 0:58:54.400
<v Speaker 1>ch sheet on your T shirt, the shirt, the T shirt,

0:58:54.520 --> 0:58:57.000
<v Speaker 1>the shirt might have the chee people come after us

0:58:57.000 --> 0:58:58.880
<v Speaker 1>though if we do that. Now, when when when a

0:58:58.880 --> 0:59:01.120
<v Speaker 1>player gets drafted, you gotta get up to sharpie and

0:59:01.120 --> 0:59:05.000
<v Speaker 1>you gotta cross his name on your T shirt. So

0:59:05.080 --> 0:59:06.720
<v Speaker 1>do you do? You print it upside down so you

0:59:06.720 --> 0:59:08.919
<v Speaker 1>can read it, so you can read it bottom to top.

0:59:09.120 --> 0:59:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Remember hypercolor? Remember the hypercolor technology? Cross it off? Yeah?

0:59:14.680 --> 0:59:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Who who thought that was a great idea. The hotter

0:59:17.080 --> 0:59:20.120
<v Speaker 1>and sweatier I get, the more my my T shirt

0:59:20.160 --> 0:59:29.240
<v Speaker 1>will involuntary sweating. He was either the hypercolor, the big

0:59:29.320 --> 0:59:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Johnson T shirts? What were the other ones? My missing fisheration,

0:59:33.200 --> 0:59:34.920
<v Speaker 1>stuff like that. This is the ninth You guys, You

0:59:34.920 --> 0:59:37.520
<v Speaker 1>guys were children of the nineties, right in the late nineties,

0:59:37.560 --> 0:59:41.720
<v Speaker 1>and high school in the late nineties. Think just a

0:59:41.720 --> 0:59:46.600
<v Speaker 1>little yeah, exactly, well, yeah, children, high schoolers are children. Yeah,

0:59:46.640 --> 0:59:49.920
<v Speaker 1>that's were I meant. I guess um, all right, It's

0:59:49.960 --> 0:59:51.680
<v Speaker 1>just a segment that we like to call three tough

0:59:51.760 --> 0:59:53.400
<v Speaker 1>Questions Now for those of you that are maybe new

0:59:53.440 --> 0:59:56.000
<v Speaker 1>to the show, you haven't caught our previous twenty five

0:59:56.080 --> 0:59:59.840
<v Speaker 1>years of doing this. I will ask a question, they

1:00:00.000 --> 1:00:03.080
<v Speaker 1>will both answer the question, and then I will give

1:00:03.120 --> 1:00:06.320
<v Speaker 1>the correct answer and you can play along. You can

1:00:06.400 --> 1:00:08.800
<v Speaker 1>answer as well. See if you can go three and

1:00:08.880 --> 1:00:11.880
<v Speaker 1>oh through the gauntlet of the three tough questions. Are

1:00:11.880 --> 1:00:16.840
<v Speaker 1>you ready? Tough question number one? Now that the Kansas

1:00:16.880 --> 1:00:20.480
<v Speaker 1>City tandem backfield strategy is dead, how about a Brown's

1:00:20.600 --> 1:00:27.040
<v Speaker 1>tandems backfield strategy? Are you advocating for it? Scott? I'm

1:00:27.040 --> 1:00:31.240
<v Speaker 1>not really advocating advocating for the stacking or pairing of

1:00:31.280 --> 1:00:33.800
<v Speaker 1>players this year, as I mentioned kind of before with

1:00:33.800 --> 1:00:35.800
<v Speaker 1>with I don't want to I don't want players in

1:00:35.800 --> 1:00:38.640
<v Speaker 1>the same room in case something happens. I will say

1:00:38.720 --> 1:00:42.280
<v Speaker 1>for those, uh, those that are looking at that strategy,

1:00:42.520 --> 1:00:46.280
<v Speaker 1>they're both decent prices and cream Hunt did produce really

1:00:46.320 --> 1:00:49.320
<v Speaker 1>well as an RB two RB three when he played

1:00:49.400 --> 1:00:52.320
<v Speaker 1>last year, so I think both are are very viable

1:00:52.400 --> 1:00:55.160
<v Speaker 1>and if one goes down, you have a a stud

1:00:55.320 --> 1:00:57.160
<v Speaker 1>RB one. So this is a this is a pretty

1:00:57.160 --> 1:00:59.800
<v Speaker 1>good strategy if if that's your risk this year. So

1:01:00.000 --> 1:01:03.040
<v Speaker 1>oh yes, is that answer? Or is that a No,

1:01:04.000 --> 1:01:06.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm not making this move but so no, yeah, no,

1:01:06.880 --> 1:01:11.400
<v Speaker 1>I guess I get it. But all right, Bryant, are

1:01:11.520 --> 1:01:15.280
<v Speaker 1>you are well? I'll just reset the question. Are you

1:01:15.320 --> 1:01:18.640
<v Speaker 1>interested in a Brown's tandem backfield strategy with your two

1:01:18.680 --> 1:01:23.640
<v Speaker 1>starters as Nick Chubb and Kareem Hunt. No, I'm out

1:01:23.680 --> 1:01:26.400
<v Speaker 1>on Chub this year based on his first round a DP.

1:01:26.640 --> 1:01:30.080
<v Speaker 1>His red zone production last year was abhorrent. He had

1:01:30.400 --> 1:01:33.320
<v Speaker 1>fifteen attempts inside the five yard line. Nick Chubb did

1:01:33.400 --> 1:01:37.560
<v Speaker 1>for negative fourteen yards, fifteen attempts for negative fourteen yards

1:01:37.600 --> 1:01:40.200
<v Speaker 1>just two touchdowns. Cream Hunt had one carrying inside the

1:01:40.240 --> 1:01:42.919
<v Speaker 1>five for three yards and he scored. And I still

1:01:42.920 --> 1:01:44.919
<v Speaker 1>think Hunt is the better running back than Nick Chubb,

1:01:44.960 --> 1:01:47.400
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not Yeah, they're both weapons, but I'm not

1:01:47.440 --> 1:01:50.000
<v Speaker 1>paying first round price for Nick Chubb. I would rather

1:01:50.040 --> 1:01:52.680
<v Speaker 1>take Echolo or even Josh Jacob's reach for them over Chubb.

1:01:52.760 --> 1:01:55.480
<v Speaker 1>That's me. Nick Chubb's really, really good. He was Profob'll

1:01:55.480 --> 1:01:58.800
<v Speaker 1>focus his highest graded running back last year UM from

1:01:58.800 --> 1:02:02.520
<v Speaker 1>weeks ten through sevent when Hunt was playing, depending on

1:02:02.520 --> 1:02:05.960
<v Speaker 1>your scoring system, so roughly both of these guys ranked

1:02:05.960 --> 1:02:08.840
<v Speaker 1>into the top fifteen of running backs. Both of them did.

1:02:09.120 --> 1:02:11.680
<v Speaker 1>Now key to the understanding this Brown's tandem strategies to

1:02:11.720 --> 1:02:15.919
<v Speaker 1>know the Chubb is going mid second round typically a DP,

1:02:16.280 --> 1:02:18.680
<v Speaker 1>and Kareem Hunt is going to the mid sixth round.

1:02:19.040 --> 1:02:21.360
<v Speaker 1>So that frees up my first round pick to not

1:02:21.440 --> 1:02:23.440
<v Speaker 1>be a running back, my third round pick to not

1:02:23.480 --> 1:02:25.680
<v Speaker 1>be a running back, my fourth rounder, my fifth rounder,

1:02:25.760 --> 1:02:28.439
<v Speaker 1>all non running backs. I'm gonna be stacked at every

1:02:28.440 --> 1:02:30.720
<v Speaker 1>other spot on the field. And now I've got the

1:02:30.760 --> 1:02:35.800
<v Speaker 1>two Browns. Now they Cleveland Gains offensive coordinator former offensive

1:02:35.800 --> 1:02:38.720
<v Speaker 1>coordinator Kevin Stefanski from Minnesota, who ran the ball the

1:02:38.800 --> 1:02:41.480
<v Speaker 1>sixth most times and the fourth most times in his

1:02:41.560 --> 1:02:44.560
<v Speaker 1>two seasons offensive coordinator. Are you saying that's an upgrade

1:02:44.560 --> 1:02:49.600
<v Speaker 1>over Freddie Kitchen? I am over Freddy Kitchens. We've seen

1:02:49.720 --> 1:02:54.160
<v Speaker 1>him harness the abilities of several good running backs. Despite

1:02:54.200 --> 1:02:56.920
<v Speaker 1>the fact that Chubb and Hunt are not built very

1:02:57.000 --> 1:03:02.200
<v Speaker 1>much alike, they are actually used shockingly similarly. Chubb is

1:03:02.240 --> 1:03:04.440
<v Speaker 1>the much bigger back, but he's very elusive and he's

1:03:04.520 --> 1:03:07.840
<v Speaker 1>very fast. He's he was ranked number two in Pro

1:03:07.880 --> 1:03:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Football Focuses elusiveness ranking despite his size, and Chubb posted

1:03:14.760 --> 1:03:20.080
<v Speaker 1>the second fastest ball carrier speed last year two for

1:03:20.160 --> 1:03:23.160
<v Speaker 1>a guy his size, it's remarkable right there. You can

1:03:23.200 --> 1:03:26.200
<v Speaker 1>also catch, and before Hunt showed up, he topped three

1:03:26.240 --> 1:03:29.080
<v Speaker 1>catches in six out of eight games Nick Chubb did,

1:03:29.200 --> 1:03:31.160
<v Speaker 1>So we know Chubb can do a little of everything.

1:03:31.280 --> 1:03:34.280
<v Speaker 1>He's got speed, he's got size, he's got ability. Then

1:03:34.280 --> 1:03:36.160
<v Speaker 1>he had in Hunt, who I think most people know better,

1:03:36.160 --> 1:03:40.160
<v Speaker 1>who did everything in Andy Reid's offenses, inside runs, outside runs.

1:03:40.160 --> 1:03:42.000
<v Speaker 1>One of the best patch catchers in the league. And

1:03:42.040 --> 1:03:46.320
<v Speaker 1>if you extrapolate hunts receiving numbers from his eight games

1:03:46.400 --> 1:03:50.920
<v Speaker 1>last year to a full season, only Christian McCaffrey and

1:03:50.960 --> 1:03:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Austin Ekeler would have topped Hunting receptions, receiving yards, and

1:03:54.440 --> 1:03:58.080
<v Speaker 1>receiving touchdowns. He had he was all. They were already

1:03:58.160 --> 1:04:01.959
<v Speaker 1>using Hunt very very well as a receiver last year.

1:04:02.520 --> 1:04:05.720
<v Speaker 1>So if I get all of that production combined together

1:04:06.000 --> 1:04:08.760
<v Speaker 1>in an offensive has every reason to get better, especially

1:04:08.920 --> 1:04:11.800
<v Speaker 1>with the improvements at offensive line. They got the best

1:04:11.960 --> 1:04:14.240
<v Speaker 1>tackle in free agency and Jack Conklin. They put a

1:04:14.240 --> 1:04:16.840
<v Speaker 1>first round pick into the other tackle spot. That offensive

1:04:16.880 --> 1:04:18.880
<v Speaker 1>line gets a lot better. That productivity that Brian was

1:04:18.880 --> 1:04:21.360
<v Speaker 1>concerned about at the goal line should go away with

1:04:21.400 --> 1:04:25.720
<v Speaker 1>these new tackles. I think you can absolutely execute and

1:04:25.840 --> 1:04:28.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it, I know it. You can should

1:04:28.240 --> 1:04:31.360
<v Speaker 1>execute a Brown's tandem back field. Okay, it needs a

1:04:31.360 --> 1:04:33.320
<v Speaker 1>better name though. He needed in a name for this,

1:04:33.520 --> 1:04:36.840
<v Speaker 1>uh strategy will come listen. I'm listening Brown Town or

1:04:38.560 --> 1:04:47.400
<v Speaker 1>next week? Tough question number two? Which second year quarterback

1:04:47.480 --> 1:04:50.360
<v Speaker 1>is most likely to make a the biggest leap in

1:04:50.520 --> 1:04:54.800
<v Speaker 1>fantasy point production? Which second year quarterback will make the

1:04:54.800 --> 1:04:58.040
<v Speaker 1>biggest leap in fantasy point production? Brian, I'll give you

1:04:58.080 --> 1:05:00.720
<v Speaker 1>a hint. He's got a mustache and it's Dner Minshew.

1:05:01.160 --> 1:05:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Really only thirteen thirteen and a half games last year,

1:05:04.560 --> 1:05:07.400
<v Speaker 1>finished with the tenth most passing touchdowns by a rookie

1:05:07.480 --> 1:05:11.040
<v Speaker 1>quarterback since the merger in nineteen seventy. Uh. Here are

1:05:11.040 --> 1:05:14.680
<v Speaker 1>the top three quarterbacks graded on throws of twenty plus

1:05:14.840 --> 1:05:17.800
<v Speaker 1>yards downfield last season. Number one Russell Wilson, Number two

1:05:17.800 --> 1:05:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Deshaun Watson, Number three Gardner Minshew. And don't forget he

1:05:22.480 --> 1:05:25.040
<v Speaker 1>can run as well. UH. Fifth in rushing yards among

1:05:25.120 --> 1:05:28.600
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks last year twenty four twenty five yards per game. Essentially,

1:05:28.600 --> 1:05:30.600
<v Speaker 1>that's about a half of passing touchdown. You can add

1:05:30.880 --> 1:05:33.680
<v Speaker 1>to his game log and Jacksonville is gonna be chasing

1:05:33.720 --> 1:05:36.880
<v Speaker 1>points on the regular uh, playing from behind throwing the

1:05:36.880 --> 1:05:41.600
<v Speaker 1>ball a Ton Gardner Minshew man top twelve potential all Right, Scott,

1:05:41.600 --> 1:05:43.840
<v Speaker 1>which second year quarterback is going to make the biggest

1:05:43.880 --> 1:05:47.080
<v Speaker 1>leap in fantasy point production? See when I read this question,

1:05:47.120 --> 1:05:50.120
<v Speaker 1>I focused on biggest leap. Gardner Minshew is already a

1:05:50.160 --> 1:05:59.480
<v Speaker 1>thirty two yard passer with two with twenty plus touchdowns.

1:05:59.680 --> 1:06:02.840
<v Speaker 1>He does, he doesn't get respected that same with Daniel

1:06:02.920 --> 1:06:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Jones three thousand yard pass the twenty plus touchdowns, uh,

1:06:06.360 --> 1:06:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Kyler Murray thirty yards, five hundred on the ground, uh

1:06:10.080 --> 1:06:13.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty four touchdowns. These guys would have to make large

1:06:13.120 --> 1:06:15.480
<v Speaker 1>leaps to do what I think Drew Lock is going

1:06:15.560 --> 1:06:18.320
<v Speaker 1>to do. Who averaged just over two hundred yards per

1:06:18.320 --> 1:06:21.240
<v Speaker 1>game and one point two touchdowns per game. Now he

1:06:21.320 --> 1:06:25.400
<v Speaker 1>has Courtland's son and Albert oh Noah fant a better line,

1:06:25.480 --> 1:06:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Melvin Gordon, He's got, he got, Jerry Judy's got kJ

1:06:29.640 --> 1:06:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Hamler to to open up open up the top there.

1:06:33.360 --> 1:06:37.640
<v Speaker 1>I think luck. I think Drew Lock has the most

1:06:37.640 --> 1:06:41.320
<v Speaker 1>potential for the biggest leap of those people, you know,

1:06:41.480 --> 1:06:44.240
<v Speaker 1>I look through. I looked through Drew Locks box scores

1:06:44.280 --> 1:06:46.320
<v Speaker 1>and just to refresh my memory, and actually even went

1:06:46.360 --> 1:06:48.520
<v Speaker 1>back and watched a little bit of video from last

1:06:48.600 --> 1:06:52.000
<v Speaker 1>year of Drew Lock just so I remember liking what

1:06:52.080 --> 1:06:54.200
<v Speaker 1>I saw, but I couldn't put it all together. And

1:06:54.200 --> 1:06:55.520
<v Speaker 1>then I went back and watched him and look the

1:06:55.520 --> 1:06:58.280
<v Speaker 1>box sers and I went, he's all right, yeah, that's

1:06:58.280 --> 1:07:00.120
<v Speaker 1>all right, And I don't know, it's just good is

1:07:00.320 --> 1:07:01.680
<v Speaker 1>you know? But I didn't. There was nothing that sort

1:07:01.720 --> 1:07:03.880
<v Speaker 1>of jumped off the page for me. And then I

1:07:03.920 --> 1:07:07.560
<v Speaker 1>went back to Daniel Jones. It's like, dang, that dude's

1:07:07.560 --> 1:07:10.680
<v Speaker 1>got it on. He may feel like he just may

1:07:10.720 --> 1:07:14.720
<v Speaker 1>have again, Um, like Gardner Minshew, the terrible defense for

1:07:14.800 --> 1:07:17.439
<v Speaker 1>the Giants is going to provide a pass happy game

1:07:17.520 --> 1:07:20.720
<v Speaker 1>script often times for him. Look at the receiving talent

1:07:20.760 --> 1:07:23.160
<v Speaker 1>around Daniel Jones. You and you correct your app You're

1:07:23.160 --> 1:07:25.160
<v Speaker 1>both right by that. You both have good answers, just

1:07:25.200 --> 1:07:28.480
<v Speaker 1>not the best answer. It's lotstery talent around Golden Tate,

1:07:28.560 --> 1:07:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Sterling Shepherd, Darius Slayton, Evan Ingram, Sa Kwon Barkley, all

1:07:32.200 --> 1:07:37.520
<v Speaker 1>those people around Daniels and again none of they never

1:07:37.560 --> 1:07:39.720
<v Speaker 1>played together in a single game. All those not one

1:07:39.720 --> 1:07:42.200
<v Speaker 1>game last year were they on the field together. Jones

1:07:42.200 --> 1:07:44.560
<v Speaker 1>still finished despite the fact that all of those guys

1:07:44.600 --> 1:07:47.440
<v Speaker 1>missed copious amounts of time played hard, et cetera. He

1:07:47.520 --> 1:07:50.960
<v Speaker 1>still finished his quarterback seventeen despite not starting four games.

1:07:51.000 --> 1:07:53.120
<v Speaker 1>By the way, he's got a lot of room to

1:07:53.160 --> 1:07:55.360
<v Speaker 1>move up from seventeen. He could cut that in half.

1:07:55.520 --> 1:08:00.200
<v Speaker 1>He could be quarterback eight as a possibility this coming season. Um.

1:08:00.240 --> 1:08:03.640
<v Speaker 1>I like the fact that he's got sneaky rushing production.

1:08:04.040 --> 1:08:06.760
<v Speaker 1>He topped over twenty five rushing yards in half his

1:08:06.840 --> 1:08:09.800
<v Speaker 1>games last year. Remember that first big breakout game that

1:08:09.800 --> 1:08:11.440
<v Speaker 1>he had against Tampa Bay wery he ran into and

1:08:11.480 --> 1:08:13.680
<v Speaker 1>he threw two and went berserk in that game. Now,

1:08:13.720 --> 1:08:16.120
<v Speaker 1>the offensive line has been terrible in New York for years.

1:08:17.560 --> 1:08:19.599
<v Speaker 1>The team spent the first, a third, and a fifth

1:08:19.720 --> 1:08:23.040
<v Speaker 1>round pick this year into the offensive line. Zeitler comes back.

1:08:23.560 --> 1:08:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Uh they had that's Andrew Thomas, Matt part and Shane

1:08:26.320 --> 1:08:29.439
<v Speaker 1>Lemieux all got drafted. So the line figures to get better.

1:08:29.479 --> 1:08:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Maybe not weak one, but those rookies will come around

1:08:32.000 --> 1:08:34.120
<v Speaker 1>over the course of the season and should be able

1:08:34.160 --> 1:08:37.040
<v Speaker 1>to help. Now many lists of the correct answers Daniel

1:08:37.120 --> 1:08:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Jones many listeners might be thinking, what about Kyler Murray.

1:08:41.040 --> 1:08:44.400
<v Speaker 1>He's going off the border at as quarterback five and

1:08:44.439 --> 1:08:47.080
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of big But that's the thing, it's

1:08:47.120 --> 1:08:49.680
<v Speaker 1>the biggest leap. Kyler Murvey is already putting up some

1:08:49.760 --> 1:08:55.240
<v Speaker 1>pretty pretty solid total yards touchdowns. He'd have to have

1:08:55.240 --> 1:08:59.639
<v Speaker 1>a Mahones Lamar Jackson. Oh yeah, and he got DeAndre

1:08:59.760 --> 1:09:04.719
<v Speaker 1>hop in the off season helps right now. Nobody mentioned

1:09:04.800 --> 1:09:07.759
<v Speaker 1>Dwayne Haskins, who has nowhere to go but up, and there's,

1:09:07.800 --> 1:09:10.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, from just a leap standpoint, because he did

1:09:10.200 --> 1:09:13.800
<v Speaker 1>he provided so little last year. It was tempting to

1:09:13.920 --> 1:09:16.680
<v Speaker 1>use Dwayne Haskins here, but that was my thoughts. I

1:09:16.720 --> 1:09:18.559
<v Speaker 1>can't even tell you that he's got How many games

1:09:18.600 --> 1:09:20.000
<v Speaker 1>are you gonna play? Can you? Can you beat out

1:09:20.040 --> 1:09:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Alex Smith on one leg? I don't know. Can he

1:09:22.840 --> 1:09:26.800
<v Speaker 1>beat on Kyle Allen? I don't know. So Kyle Allen

1:09:26.920 --> 1:09:30.639
<v Speaker 1>over from Carolina. I'm ne I just I can't get

1:09:30.680 --> 1:09:37.200
<v Speaker 1>I can't embrace Dwayne Haskins at this point. Tough question

1:09:37.360 --> 1:09:43.400
<v Speaker 1>number three. All three of these d j's are going

1:09:43.479 --> 1:09:45.719
<v Speaker 1>within one round of each other, so they're all within

1:09:45.760 --> 1:09:49.040
<v Speaker 1>twelve picks, and you're on the clock. You have to

1:09:49.120 --> 1:09:55.360
<v Speaker 1>choose from DJ Shark, d J Moore, or David Johnson.

1:09:55.880 --> 1:09:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Who are you selecting, Scott? Oh, we're not going back

1:09:58.840 --> 1:10:01.880
<v Speaker 1>and forth at freaked me out there? Oh no it is.

1:10:03.120 --> 1:10:05.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm going with d J Moore. And honestly, it's really

1:10:06.000 --> 1:10:07.639
<v Speaker 1>not that close for me. As much as I love

1:10:07.720 --> 1:10:10.880
<v Speaker 1>DJ Shark. What d J Moore has done in his

1:10:11.240 --> 1:10:14.000
<v Speaker 1>first two years being a guy that's under twenty three,

1:10:14.320 --> 1:10:17.240
<v Speaker 1>only ten other wide receivers have had nineteen hundred total

1:10:17.400 --> 1:10:20.679
<v Speaker 1>nine hundred receiving yards before the age of twenty three,

1:10:20.680 --> 1:10:25.200
<v Speaker 1>and at that list is like Evans, Fitzgerald, Moss, Juju

1:10:25.400 --> 1:10:30.440
<v Speaker 1>uh Andre Hopkins, that Josh Gordon and Allen Robinson type guys. Um,

1:10:30.640 --> 1:10:32.800
<v Speaker 1>that's what I love his production. I know he's got

1:10:32.800 --> 1:10:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Teddy Chark, He's gonna he's gonna get some targets taken

1:10:36.280 --> 1:10:39.720
<v Speaker 1>away from him from Chris Thompson, from Chennault is going

1:10:39.760 --> 1:10:43.240
<v Speaker 1>to be there now with Minshew, Um, David Johnson not

1:10:43.360 --> 1:10:45.519
<v Speaker 1>for me at all. David Johnson is the guy that

1:10:45.560 --> 1:10:48.240
<v Speaker 1>you're drafting in that spot because you punted running back

1:10:48.240 --> 1:10:52.160
<v Speaker 1>for five rounds and you need to find someone who

1:10:52.240 --> 1:10:54.920
<v Speaker 1>might be a starter. David Johnson doesn't even come and

1:10:55.000 --> 1:10:58.639
<v Speaker 1>come close in my in my eyes, Brian, well, I'm

1:10:58.680 --> 1:11:03.680
<v Speaker 1>taking David Johns in. Of course, it helps to know

1:11:03.680 --> 1:11:06.280
<v Speaker 1>who's on your team already. I'm gonna build my team

1:11:06.280 --> 1:11:09.920
<v Speaker 1>around the DJ's in the future. Grounds. But if I want,

1:11:10.160 --> 1:11:12.920
<v Speaker 1>I like David Johnson this year, and people have basically

1:11:13.200 --> 1:11:16.160
<v Speaker 1>put him out the pastor that's very unfair, uh, through

1:11:16.439 --> 1:11:18.679
<v Speaker 1>Like anybody who's drafted him in the last three years,

1:11:19.400 --> 1:11:22.000
<v Speaker 1>we all remember the last vision of him was an

1:11:22.000 --> 1:11:25.440
<v Speaker 1>awful run late in the season. Everything running in molasses.

1:11:25.479 --> 1:11:28.320
<v Speaker 1>But let's think about the first eight games. He finished

1:11:28.360 --> 1:11:30.679
<v Speaker 1>as RB ten through the first eight weeks of the season.

1:11:30.760 --> 1:11:33.599
<v Speaker 1>He only played in six of those games. He missed

1:11:33.640 --> 1:11:36.799
<v Speaker 1>the Week seven game against the Giants, when Chase Edmonds

1:11:36.800 --> 1:11:39.760
<v Speaker 1>finished as he RB won with three touchdowns and like

1:11:39.800 --> 1:11:42.640
<v Speaker 1>two hundred combo yards. If David Johnson got he was

1:11:42.960 --> 1:11:48.519
<v Speaker 1>knocked up, you know, banged up, knocked the lumbering around man.

1:11:48.720 --> 1:11:53.240
<v Speaker 1>But you know, tally those numbers onto his first half

1:11:53.240 --> 1:11:55.160
<v Speaker 1>of the season, he's RB one through the first half

1:11:55.200 --> 1:11:57.160
<v Speaker 1>of the season. Yes, he came back late in the season,

1:11:57.240 --> 1:11:59.519
<v Speaker 1>he looked awful, but when he was healthy, the first half,

1:11:59.560 --> 1:12:03.400
<v Speaker 1>he was running behind the fourth worst graded run blocking

1:12:03.439 --> 1:12:06.519
<v Speaker 1>line by Pro Football Focus. He had a volatile rookie quarterback.

1:12:07.160 --> 1:12:09.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm giving I'm going glass half al with David Johnson

1:12:09.439 --> 1:12:12.160
<v Speaker 1>here in Houston. I think Bill O'Brien they never throw

1:12:12.160 --> 1:12:13.840
<v Speaker 1>of the running backs there. He has to flip the

1:12:13.880 --> 1:12:17.240
<v Speaker 1>script on that in that regard. So David Johnson, let's go.

1:12:17.240 --> 1:12:19.200
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna finish as an RB one. Let's be fair.

1:12:19.320 --> 1:12:21.960
<v Speaker 1>He's only five years removed from a thousand yards season.

1:12:22.240 --> 1:12:27.479
<v Speaker 1>So well, just the other day one of the one

1:12:27.479 --> 1:12:29.360
<v Speaker 1>of the last years was a broken arm. You gotta

1:12:29.400 --> 1:12:31.559
<v Speaker 1>give him a little break there. But I know he's

1:12:31.560 --> 1:12:33.200
<v Speaker 1>got he's got some things to prove. We'll see if

1:12:33.240 --> 1:12:35.479
<v Speaker 1>you can do it. Yeah, I just I'm I need

1:12:35.640 --> 1:12:38.120
<v Speaker 1>David Johnson's lost the benefit of the doubt for me

1:12:38.240 --> 1:12:41.519
<v Speaker 1>at this point, and he might hit. As it turned out,

1:12:41.560 --> 1:12:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Carlos Hyde, who's awful, ended up being a meaningful fantasy

1:12:45.080 --> 1:12:48.760
<v Speaker 1>contributor just by being the guy who got the ball

1:12:48.800 --> 1:12:50.880
<v Speaker 1>in Houston. So I mean there's something to be said.

1:12:51.120 --> 1:12:53.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, if he's unless he's so bad that they

1:12:53.240 --> 1:12:55.800
<v Speaker 1>really can't even use him, David Johnson is probably going

1:12:55.840 --> 1:12:58.240
<v Speaker 1>to be fine. And I don't like Johnson there though,

1:12:58.240 --> 1:13:01.679
<v Speaker 1>because he's maybe the second best pass catching back after

1:13:01.760 --> 1:13:05.320
<v Speaker 1>David Johnson. One of Yeah, they got to change that

1:13:05.360 --> 1:13:07.759
<v Speaker 1>because we thought when they passed to the running backs,

1:13:07.920 --> 1:13:10.000
<v Speaker 1>one of the lowest in the NFL DeShawn Watson, and

1:13:10.040 --> 1:13:12.280
<v Speaker 1>they brought into Johnson and they still didn't pass to him.

1:13:12.280 --> 1:13:15.840
<v Speaker 1>So receptions for running backs last year for the Texans

1:13:15.920 --> 1:13:18.040
<v Speaker 1>fourth fewest. They had fifty the year before that was

1:13:18.080 --> 1:13:24.679
<v Speaker 1>the least of the least. The correct answer is d J. Yeah,

1:13:25.479 --> 1:13:28.000
<v Speaker 1>let's talk it through, guys. D J. Moore and Chart,

1:13:28.040 --> 1:13:30.240
<v Speaker 1>by the way, finished last year depending your scoring system

1:13:30.280 --> 1:13:33.200
<v Speaker 1>is roughly wide receiver fifteen and sixteen right next to

1:13:33.200 --> 1:13:35.880
<v Speaker 1>each other, but then missed two games and were missed

1:13:35.880 --> 1:13:38.960
<v Speaker 1>two games in fairness, and they got there very both

1:13:39.000 --> 1:13:42.200
<v Speaker 1>similar and and odd allways. The similar part is they

1:13:42.240 --> 1:13:46.920
<v Speaker 1>both thrived despite inexperienced quarterbacks who were very at times inconsistent,

1:13:47.400 --> 1:13:49.519
<v Speaker 1>and that the fact that they were as good as

1:13:49.560 --> 1:13:52.280
<v Speaker 1>they were with those quarterbacks I thought was a testament

1:13:52.280 --> 1:13:55.040
<v Speaker 1>to how good they both are as receivers. Now. D J.

1:13:55.200 --> 1:13:58.439
<v Speaker 1>Moore was a model of consistency. He put up you

1:13:58.439 --> 1:14:00.720
<v Speaker 1>know you wanted your five years, your I've catches for

1:14:00.760 --> 1:14:02.680
<v Speaker 1>seventy yards. DJ Moore was your guy if you want

1:14:02.720 --> 1:14:04.920
<v Speaker 1>any touchdowns. He only scored in three games last year.

1:14:05.160 --> 1:14:10.000
<v Speaker 1>That's it, just three. And then you bring in I know,

1:14:10.200 --> 1:14:13.439
<v Speaker 1>then you bring in Teddy Bridgewater, who shortens the field,

1:14:13.520 --> 1:14:21.040
<v Speaker 1>which just doesn't help it help Is he I don't know. Probably, yes,

1:14:21.200 --> 1:14:24.000
<v Speaker 1>he probably is better than he's better than them, But

1:14:24.160 --> 1:14:26.479
<v Speaker 1>is that is the kind of quarterback that Teddy is

1:14:26.920 --> 1:14:29.400
<v Speaker 1>going to help any receiver flourish and take the next

1:14:29.439 --> 1:14:31.680
<v Speaker 1>step forward in his progression for a young receiver. And

1:14:31.720 --> 1:14:34.519
<v Speaker 1>I don't think Teddy's got it in him. DJ Chark

1:14:34.640 --> 1:14:39.479
<v Speaker 1>though much more ex explosive. He scored in six different games,

1:14:39.880 --> 1:14:42.840
<v Speaker 1>but those were his big games, and he had the

1:14:42.960 --> 1:14:45.800
<v Speaker 1>bad games when Minshew just didn't hit him right or

1:14:45.800 --> 1:14:47.200
<v Speaker 1>he just had you know, he had the three catch

1:14:47.240 --> 1:14:50.000
<v Speaker 1>for thirty yard games. So Chuck was way more volatile.

1:14:50.080 --> 1:14:53.760
<v Speaker 1>But I think Minshew, for the reasons that Brian elucidated

1:14:53.800 --> 1:14:57.160
<v Speaker 1>moments ago, Minshew will end up righting the ship. He'll

1:14:57.200 --> 1:15:00.280
<v Speaker 1>be better in year two. The team obviously thinks that

1:15:00.280 --> 1:15:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Minho is gonna better because they made no moves at

1:15:02.320 --> 1:15:05.600
<v Speaker 1>quarterback other than shedding Nick Foles. So this is a

1:15:05.640 --> 1:15:08.519
<v Speaker 1>good opportunity for Minshew to get better, and he's got

1:15:08.560 --> 1:15:14.240
<v Speaker 1>the arm to make any play a deep successful. To

1:15:14.360 --> 1:15:16.599
<v Speaker 1>d J. Chark, he does with his legs and then

1:15:16.600 --> 1:15:19.559
<v Speaker 1>she does. He draws a lot of comparisons to a J. Green,

1:15:19.640 --> 1:15:23.080
<v Speaker 1>who thrived under Ja Gruden as a o C in

1:15:23.320 --> 1:15:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Cincinnati unhealthy, So good Pointruden loves them, loves Chark and

1:15:27.120 --> 1:15:31.639
<v Speaker 1>charking former first rounder. I like Joe Brady and Carolina too.

1:15:32.240 --> 1:15:36.720
<v Speaker 1>Coming from I know, but I mean this is like

1:15:36.840 --> 1:15:38.800
<v Speaker 1>I used I thought it was like tie break. I

1:15:38.800 --> 1:15:40.960
<v Speaker 1>just like, I like, I'm hooking my wagon to Gardner

1:15:41.000 --> 1:15:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Minshew before I am Teddy Bridgewater for fantasy purpose. So

1:15:44.439 --> 1:15:47.679
<v Speaker 1>d J Chark the correct answer. When we come back,

1:15:49.000 --> 1:15:51.040
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk about all the things your league

1:15:51.040 --> 1:15:55.080
<v Speaker 1>needs to cover from a COVID perspective. How are you

1:15:55.080 --> 1:15:58.880
<v Speaker 1>going to handle the eventuality for the players who get

1:15:58.880 --> 1:16:01.799
<v Speaker 1>COVID and it's gonna happen in a worst case scenario

1:16:01.840 --> 1:16:05.240
<v Speaker 1>for your league, and you have to get these things

1:16:05.520 --> 1:16:08.840
<v Speaker 1>squared away in the preseason or you're going to in friendships,

1:16:09.400 --> 1:16:13.040
<v Speaker 1>leagues will dissolve over the conflicts that are coming over COVID,

1:16:13.720 --> 1:16:18.920
<v Speaker 1>don't become another COVID victim. Fantasy Football Weekly Returns and

1:16:19.040 --> 1:16:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Moments Welcome Back, final segment of Fantasy Football Weekly. Baul Giarchie,

1:16:37.320 --> 1:16:39.639
<v Speaker 1>It's got Fishing Brian Johnson with you. If you've ever

1:16:39.680 --> 1:16:42.960
<v Speaker 1>wanted to try a guillotine league, go to gaillata leagues

1:16:43.040 --> 1:16:45.960
<v Speaker 1>dot com. The premise is simple. You start with seventeen teams.

1:16:45.960 --> 1:16:48.240
<v Speaker 1>There's no head to head. Every week of the season,

1:16:48.280 --> 1:16:51.320
<v Speaker 1>the low scoring team gets lopped off, they're done, and

1:16:51.360 --> 1:16:54.000
<v Speaker 1>their entire roster goes to the waiver wire, where everybody

1:16:54.040 --> 1:16:57.240
<v Speaker 1>else gets to feast on those players and build a

1:16:57.320 --> 1:17:01.240
<v Speaker 1>bigger and better line up. The last team standing wins.

1:17:01.320 --> 1:17:03.720
<v Speaker 1>It's Guillotine Leagues. At Guillotine leagues dot com. If you've

1:17:03.760 --> 1:17:05.640
<v Speaker 1>got sixteen other people you want to play with, you

1:17:05.680 --> 1:17:08.360
<v Speaker 1>can have us run your league. Or if you just

1:17:08.360 --> 1:17:09.720
<v Speaker 1>want to join the leaguess you don't know six and

1:17:09.760 --> 1:17:11.200
<v Speaker 1>others don't want to play a gay team league. We've

1:17:11.200 --> 1:17:12.800
<v Speaker 1>got leagues you can join at every price point in

1:17:12.840 --> 1:17:16.080
<v Speaker 1>prize level as well leagues dot com. You want to

1:17:16.160 --> 1:17:18.639
<v Speaker 1>run your league on Guillotine Leagues got dot com because

1:17:18.800 --> 1:17:20.880
<v Speaker 1>running it on any other site is a huge paid.

1:17:21.040 --> 1:17:24.160
<v Speaker 1>They're not made They're not made for this. We, however,

1:17:24.280 --> 1:17:27.320
<v Speaker 1>are built from the ground up to support Guillotine League. Specifically,

1:17:27.960 --> 1:17:30.320
<v Speaker 1>final segment, guys, we're gonna talk about two main things,

1:17:31.840 --> 1:17:34.560
<v Speaker 1>the plans you need to cover now for COVID, and

1:17:34.600 --> 1:17:37.400
<v Speaker 1>as we do in the final segment of every show

1:17:37.520 --> 1:17:42.280
<v Speaker 1>every preseason, we each divulge one sleeper player. Some of

1:17:42.280 --> 1:17:45.000
<v Speaker 1>these players have already been mentioned, but we'll get dive

1:17:45.040 --> 1:17:47.880
<v Speaker 1>into them a little bit deeper. Let's begin with the

1:17:47.960 --> 1:17:51.600
<v Speaker 1>COVID plans that you need to cover now. First, I

1:17:51.640 --> 1:17:53.840
<v Speaker 1>think that the easy stuff, by the way, you have

1:17:53.920 --> 1:17:55.760
<v Speaker 1>to do it now. You have to do it in

1:17:55.800 --> 1:17:59.559
<v Speaker 1>the preseason. If you wait until the season is going

1:17:59.720 --> 1:18:03.320
<v Speaker 1>and you try to make rules and adjustments, it's going

1:18:03.400 --> 1:18:08.799
<v Speaker 1>to go haywire because people then have a vested interest

1:18:08.840 --> 1:18:13.120
<v Speaker 1>in a particular outcome. You know, if if if I'm

1:18:13.360 --> 1:18:15.280
<v Speaker 1>nine and one, I think that the you know, in

1:18:15.360 --> 1:18:17.400
<v Speaker 1>the season goes ten weeks and I'm nine and one

1:18:17.640 --> 1:18:19.920
<v Speaker 1>and you cancel the season in week ten, I'm gonna

1:18:19.960 --> 1:18:22.439
<v Speaker 1>be feeling pretty strong. Only the best winning percentage ought

1:18:22.479 --> 1:18:25.200
<v Speaker 1>to be the winner, right, So there's going I had

1:18:25.200 --> 1:18:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the most total points exactly and Brian had the most

1:18:27.800 --> 1:18:29.960
<v Speaker 1>total points, and he's really convinced that the most Totle

1:18:30.000 --> 1:18:32.519
<v Speaker 1>points should be the way. And that's how you end

1:18:32.600 --> 1:18:35.800
<v Speaker 1>up ruining a league, ruining friendships. You have to do

1:18:35.880 --> 1:18:39.240
<v Speaker 1>this in the preseason. Uh. The easy part of this

1:18:39.439 --> 1:18:41.880
<v Speaker 1>is think about your draft or your auction, whether or

1:18:41.880 --> 1:18:43.400
<v Speaker 1>not you're gonna do that in person, you're gonna do

1:18:43.400 --> 1:18:45.920
<v Speaker 1>it online. I think you could, you know, and you

1:18:45.960 --> 1:18:48.439
<v Speaker 1>can socially distance in a backyard, and I think you

1:18:48.479 --> 1:18:52.080
<v Speaker 1>can pull off either one in a backyard and you could.

1:18:52.200 --> 1:18:53.400
<v Speaker 1>You could do it that way, and I think it'd

1:18:53.400 --> 1:18:54.920
<v Speaker 1>be pretty easy to do in person, and the in

1:18:54.960 --> 1:18:57.000
<v Speaker 1>person drafts a big part of fantasy football. You can

1:18:57.040 --> 1:19:01.320
<v Speaker 1>even socially distance inside just mask up everyone mask Yeah, yeah,

1:19:01.360 --> 1:19:03.320
<v Speaker 1>you could. You could do it inside as well. It's

1:19:03.320 --> 1:19:06.120
<v Speaker 1>easier outside in it's summer, so you know, why not

1:19:06.160 --> 1:19:09.519
<v Speaker 1>do it. I'm not gonna do It' not gonna argue that, okay, Um,

1:19:09.640 --> 1:19:11.400
<v Speaker 1>but you might have to change the you might have

1:19:11.479 --> 1:19:13.200
<v Speaker 1>changed the date of your auction or draft. You might

1:19:13.240 --> 1:19:14.840
<v Speaker 1>have to be a little bit nimble on that, but

1:19:14.960 --> 1:19:17.040
<v Speaker 1>you probably will not have to. I'd like to think

1:19:17.080 --> 1:19:22.200
<v Speaker 1>the NFL is not going to change the starting date

1:19:22.200 --> 1:19:24.559
<v Speaker 1>of the season, but it's a possibility that it could

1:19:24.600 --> 1:19:31.080
<v Speaker 1>be moved back. Scott, let's talk about COVID slots. Um.

1:19:31.120 --> 1:19:34.200
<v Speaker 1>You know we're all familiar with I ARE. Do you

1:19:34.240 --> 1:19:36.640
<v Speaker 1>believe that elite should have COVID slots for when a

1:19:36.680 --> 1:19:40.680
<v Speaker 1>player does get designated as having COVID COVID and is

1:19:40.720 --> 1:19:42.720
<v Speaker 1>it just I ARE or is it different than I ARE.

1:19:43.080 --> 1:19:45.879
<v Speaker 1>It depends on what your host sets up. The hosts

1:19:45.960 --> 1:19:48.200
<v Speaker 1>I have seen out there there at least a couple

1:19:48.240 --> 1:19:51.360
<v Speaker 1>of them already that have them allow them on I ARE.

1:19:51.680 --> 1:19:55.360
<v Speaker 1>And so in that case it's easy either unlimited i

1:19:55.560 --> 1:19:57.559
<v Speaker 1>R or just increase the i R. It all depends

1:19:57.560 --> 1:20:01.080
<v Speaker 1>on how much you want to be tracked. You know,

1:20:01.240 --> 1:20:03.880
<v Speaker 1>if if you're trying to track an exact amount of

1:20:03.880 --> 1:20:06.160
<v Speaker 1>COVID players are allowed on i R or an exact

1:20:06.200 --> 1:20:09.920
<v Speaker 1>amount of our players, what your previous I R rules are.

1:20:10.240 --> 1:20:12.080
<v Speaker 1>I think this is one of those years that we

1:20:12.160 --> 1:20:15.240
<v Speaker 1>have to know concessions will be will have to be made,

1:20:15.240 --> 1:20:17.479
<v Speaker 1>and you're gonna have to work within the confines of

1:20:17.520 --> 1:20:21.080
<v Speaker 1>what your host allows. Your hosting site. Yes, yeah, and

1:20:21.280 --> 1:20:23.360
<v Speaker 1>uh for many of the sites, they don't have something

1:20:23.400 --> 1:20:25.600
<v Speaker 1>special for COVID. They just have I R and I

1:20:25.640 --> 1:20:27.519
<v Speaker 1>guess you could use that. I like separating it is

1:20:27.560 --> 1:20:29.880
<v Speaker 1>two different designations. If you can, if you're your hosting

1:20:29.880 --> 1:20:33.519
<v Speaker 1>site allows that, but perhaps it does not. Um so

1:20:33.880 --> 1:20:35.559
<v Speaker 1>is there you should should there be a limit on

1:20:35.560 --> 1:20:39.000
<v Speaker 1>the number of COVID slots that you give a team.

1:20:39.040 --> 1:20:42.360
<v Speaker 1>If I get stricken with eight players with COVID, should

1:20:42.360 --> 1:20:43.800
<v Speaker 1>I only be able to put three on because you

1:20:43.840 --> 1:20:47.040
<v Speaker 1>only have three COVID slots? Probably not? Probably shouldn't be unlimited, right,

1:20:47.160 --> 1:20:50.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm already suffering enough. It should be unlimited. But if

1:20:50.520 --> 1:20:53.920
<v Speaker 1>we're needing to use unlimited COVID spots, I'm pretty sure

1:20:53.960 --> 1:20:56.120
<v Speaker 1>the season is over at that point. But yeah, but

1:20:56.439 --> 1:20:59.720
<v Speaker 1>you want to more than usual. Of course, it also

1:21:00.000 --> 1:21:02.880
<v Speaker 1>bull double the amount easily. You also have to keep

1:21:02.880 --> 1:21:04.839
<v Speaker 1>an eye on your lely, like you might have anti

1:21:04.880 --> 1:21:07.879
<v Speaker 1>hoarding rules, meaning you can't pick someone up off waivers,

1:21:08.240 --> 1:21:09.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, just to put them on I R. Some

1:21:10.040 --> 1:21:12.920
<v Speaker 1>leagues have that that might be tough to watch with unlimited,

1:21:13.160 --> 1:21:15.320
<v Speaker 1>but you know, that's that's something to be aware of,

1:21:15.360 --> 1:21:17.920
<v Speaker 1>all right. Related to that, and again we're talking about

1:21:17.920 --> 1:21:20.080
<v Speaker 1>COVID eventualities that you need to be thinking about now.

1:21:20.160 --> 1:21:22.360
<v Speaker 1>We're going to get into our our sleepers in just

1:21:22.400 --> 1:21:29.800
<v Speaker 1>a moment. Some leagues are expanding the number of roster spots,

1:21:30.360 --> 1:21:32.920
<v Speaker 1>assuming that some players are gonna be COVID, so this

1:21:33.000 --> 1:21:35.760
<v Speaker 1>way you've got more players. I think this is the

1:21:35.760 --> 1:21:38.519
<v Speaker 1>wrong approach. It's terrible unless your host doesn't allow them

1:21:38.520 --> 1:21:41.719
<v Speaker 1>on IR. That's the only justification I can see, correct,

1:21:42.000 --> 1:21:44.280
<v Speaker 1>because now you're what you're doing is you're thinning out

1:21:44.280 --> 1:21:46.400
<v Speaker 1>the waiver wire, so there's no talent left on the

1:21:46.439 --> 1:21:48.720
<v Speaker 1>waiver wire. And my guy gets stricken with COVID and

1:21:48.720 --> 1:21:51.080
<v Speaker 1>you got nobody to turn to. And it's still benefiting

1:21:51.120 --> 1:21:55.040
<v Speaker 1>in the teams that don't have COVID people, Yeah, right right,

1:21:55.080 --> 1:21:57.280
<v Speaker 1>they're they're just getting all they get is more spots.

1:21:57.520 --> 1:22:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Great point. Great point, don't don't expand and your roster size.

1:22:01.280 --> 1:22:06.599
<v Speaker 1>Just allow an unlimited number of COVID of COVID players

1:22:06.640 --> 1:22:09.519
<v Speaker 1>to go on I R or a COVID designation. That's

1:22:09.560 --> 1:22:12.040
<v Speaker 1>the way, that is the appropriate way to do this. Um,

1:22:12.080 --> 1:22:14.040
<v Speaker 1>we think when a player gets tested positive, he's going

1:22:14.080 --> 1:22:16.840
<v Speaker 1>to be out what two weeks, two games, something in

1:22:16.880 --> 1:22:20.200
<v Speaker 1>that something in that ballpark. Um, you know, these guys

1:22:20.280 --> 1:22:23.280
<v Speaker 1>are not are very, very unlikely to be in any

1:22:23.400 --> 1:22:28.080
<v Speaker 1>real mortal danger because they are young and in excellent,

1:22:28.240 --> 1:22:30.680
<v Speaker 1>excellent conditions. So you know, I don't I don't think

1:22:30.680 --> 1:22:33.440
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna have a scenario where we have a fatality.

1:22:33.560 --> 1:22:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Let's let's certainly hope that's not the case. That is

1:22:38.040 --> 1:22:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the sort of thing that good cancel the season, and

1:22:40.000 --> 1:22:42.880
<v Speaker 1>and so let's let's move to that. Now, this is

1:22:42.920 --> 1:22:46.240
<v Speaker 1>maybe the single most important decision that your league has

1:22:46.280 --> 1:22:51.200
<v Speaker 1>to make. How many games need to be played for

1:22:51.320 --> 1:22:56.439
<v Speaker 1>it to be a valid season? And then how do

1:22:56.479 --> 1:22:58.479
<v Speaker 1>you determine the winner if it gets cut short? Correct?

1:22:58.560 --> 1:23:00.840
<v Speaker 1>And how do you determine the winner? So I'm gonna

1:23:01.160 --> 1:23:03.240
<v Speaker 1>run a couple of scenarios by you at guilloteam leagues

1:23:03.280 --> 1:23:05.080
<v Speaker 1>dot com. We're using eight weeks if you you know,

1:23:05.080 --> 1:23:07.120
<v Speaker 1>if we if you, if you grind through two months

1:23:07.120 --> 1:23:09.639
<v Speaker 1>of play, we want to award prizing at that point

1:23:09.720 --> 1:23:13.639
<v Speaker 1>and clarify eight week eight is in the books, complete

1:23:13.880 --> 1:23:16.880
<v Speaker 1>completed weeks. Yep, eight completed weeks is what we are using.

1:23:17.160 --> 1:23:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Now your only do it your way. But at the

1:23:19.720 --> 1:23:21.240
<v Speaker 1>end of eight weeks, you haven't had even you haven't

1:23:21.240 --> 1:23:23.960
<v Speaker 1>started any playoffs, right, So let's play out this this

1:23:24.000 --> 1:23:27.680
<v Speaker 1>scenario where the playoffs haven't happened yet, and you the

1:23:27.800 --> 1:23:30.080
<v Speaker 1>NFL canceled the season. By the way, the eight weeks

1:23:30.080 --> 1:23:32.160
<v Speaker 1>don't have to be contiguous. It could be a month on.

1:23:32.360 --> 1:23:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Then the league shuts down for two weeks. Every he

1:23:34.280 --> 1:23:35.640
<v Speaker 1>gets healthy and they come back and play for me,

1:23:35.760 --> 1:23:41.679
<v Speaker 1>interrupted interrupted season whatever. So, um, in that case, we're

1:23:41.720 --> 1:23:44.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're we are deciding we're using winning percentage

1:23:45.160 --> 1:23:49.400
<v Speaker 1>as the as the winning criteria and for and then

1:23:49.439 --> 1:23:52.919
<v Speaker 1>after that total points scored as a tiebreaker. Sound reasonable.

1:23:53.479 --> 1:23:56.920
<v Speaker 1>I've seen on the lower end like there there. I've

1:23:56.960 --> 1:23:59.000
<v Speaker 1>seen it all all the way from four weeks to

1:23:59.040 --> 1:24:01.120
<v Speaker 1>ten weeks. I seen ones on the lore end that

1:24:01.160 --> 1:24:03.559
<v Speaker 1>are going by all play to a certain point and

1:24:03.560 --> 1:24:06.559
<v Speaker 1>then switching to win loss just because at that point

1:24:06.560 --> 1:24:08.600
<v Speaker 1>you have played enough, You've played enough games. Yeah, that

1:24:08.640 --> 1:24:11.360
<v Speaker 1>can make sense. I kind of like the all play idea. UM.

1:24:11.479 --> 1:24:12.960
<v Speaker 1>I actually I think I like it a lot the

1:24:13.000 --> 1:24:16.320
<v Speaker 1>more that I think about that. Um. Then, so let's

1:24:16.320 --> 1:24:18.040
<v Speaker 1>play it out a little further. Let's say it gets

1:24:18.080 --> 1:24:23.519
<v Speaker 1>into the fantasy playoffs and the season is the season

1:24:23.640 --> 1:24:26.040
<v Speaker 1>is canceled. So let's say it's the NFL week fifteen,

1:24:26.680 --> 1:24:29.240
<v Speaker 1>and for whatever reason, the season is over right there. Yep.

1:24:29.880 --> 1:24:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Now there's the old to me, the only winning only

1:24:33.120 --> 1:24:34.920
<v Speaker 1>the teams that are still live are eligible to be

1:24:34.960 --> 1:24:37.840
<v Speaker 1>winners at that point. So the teams that have still

1:24:37.880 --> 1:24:40.519
<v Speaker 1>that are still live or in and it's just best

1:24:40.520 --> 1:24:42.920
<v Speaker 1>winning percentage. It's still best winning percentage ever win the

1:24:42.920 --> 1:24:45.599
<v Speaker 1>most games, and then again the tiebreaker would be total

1:24:45.640 --> 1:24:47.640
<v Speaker 1>points scored or if you can get together with the

1:24:47.680 --> 1:24:50.880
<v Speaker 1>guys or gals and the playoffs with you cage matched.

1:24:51.120 --> 1:24:56.759
<v Speaker 1>What I have seen out there is the after week fifteen,

1:24:56.760 --> 1:24:59.680
<v Speaker 1>there's four left, the four split after week sixteen, the

1:24:59.760 --> 1:25:02.040
<v Speaker 1>chair up in second split, and the third place game split.

1:25:02.080 --> 1:25:04.000
<v Speaker 1>I've seen that I could see. I'm just throwing it

1:25:04.000 --> 1:25:06.320
<v Speaker 1>out there for listeners. I'm just not a big split

1:25:06.360 --> 1:25:08.479
<v Speaker 1>the pod guy, and just you know, let's just be

1:25:08.520 --> 1:25:11.640
<v Speaker 1>brave and have winners. Um, all right, let's talk to

1:25:11.680 --> 1:25:13.479
<v Speaker 1>a couple other things. What if it doesn't get the

1:25:13.520 --> 1:25:16.840
<v Speaker 1>season does not get to the the let's let's say

1:25:16.840 --> 1:25:19.880
<v Speaker 1>eight weeks that you're using is a valid season, then

1:25:20.040 --> 1:25:23.600
<v Speaker 1>what in my mind, everybody you've paid, you're paid for

1:25:23.640 --> 1:25:25.439
<v Speaker 1>next year. You were just rolling over your funds to

1:25:25.520 --> 1:25:29.519
<v Speaker 1>next season. Yep, we all agree on multiple levels. Dealing

1:25:29.560 --> 1:25:34.720
<v Speaker 1>with money sucks, right, Yeah, so we just roll over,

1:25:34.960 --> 1:25:37.760
<v Speaker 1>or some people might want their money back. I would

1:25:37.800 --> 1:25:39.280
<v Speaker 1>give it to them in that regard to and then

1:25:39.320 --> 1:25:40.960
<v Speaker 1>they can pay again next year. Of course, yes, you

1:25:40.960 --> 1:25:42.439
<v Speaker 1>get your money back. Do you want that person in

1:25:42.479 --> 1:25:44.519
<v Speaker 1>your league? Though? Like they want their money back for

1:25:44.560 --> 1:25:46.800
<v Speaker 1>the like two months and then I suppose maybe if

1:25:46.800 --> 1:25:50.240
<v Speaker 1>they're in a situation they needed. No, you don't, but yeah,

1:25:50.280 --> 1:25:53.879
<v Speaker 1>but that's probably edge case anyway. But yeah, next Dynasty

1:25:53.920 --> 1:25:59.080
<v Speaker 1>and Empire leagues, if you have a canceled season, how

1:25:59.120 --> 1:26:02.400
<v Speaker 1>do you handle the draft order the next year? This

1:26:02.439 --> 1:26:05.839
<v Speaker 1>is a this is a thorny issue. I don't believe

1:26:05.880 --> 1:26:09.880
<v Speaker 1>you should just roll over last year's draft positions because

1:26:10.000 --> 1:26:13.000
<v Speaker 1>the teams that drafted first, he's gonna go first again.

1:26:13.320 --> 1:26:15.840
<v Speaker 1>You're that doesn't seem very fair. And the team that

1:26:16.000 --> 1:26:18.160
<v Speaker 1>one champion that won the championships is gonna get penalized

1:26:18.160 --> 1:26:22.720
<v Speaker 1>again and go last. I like a weighted lottery, a

1:26:22.840 --> 1:26:26.080
<v Speaker 1>weighted lottery for the teams, for all of the teams.

1:26:26.640 --> 1:26:28.920
<v Speaker 1>And if so, if you pin it, if you finished, uh,

1:26:29.000 --> 1:26:31.080
<v Speaker 1>if you finished first, you have one ping pong ball.

1:26:31.120 --> 1:26:33.120
<v Speaker 1>If you finished last, you have twelve ping pong balls,

1:26:33.400 --> 1:26:35.760
<v Speaker 1>and I'd pull I'd pull balls for the lot the

1:26:35.840 --> 1:26:38.360
<v Speaker 1>draft order next. If you're doing one through twelve like that,

1:26:39.000 --> 1:26:41.920
<v Speaker 1>I would highly recommend not allowing someone to jump more

1:26:41.960 --> 1:26:45.560
<v Speaker 1>than three spots up because that amount of balls, the

1:26:46.080 --> 1:26:48.880
<v Speaker 1>best team in the league could very well go on. Yeah.

1:26:48.880 --> 1:26:51.360
<v Speaker 1>I can live with that, that really could. But that's

1:26:51.400 --> 1:26:55.479
<v Speaker 1>just me if you're very very unlikely. Though, if you're

1:26:55.479 --> 1:26:58.720
<v Speaker 1>willing and able to go to auction, which you should be,

1:26:58.960 --> 1:27:01.720
<v Speaker 1>you could also do based on your finishing, you get

1:27:01.760 --> 1:27:04.040
<v Speaker 1>more of a budget. The worst your team was going

1:27:04.080 --> 1:27:06.120
<v Speaker 1>into an auction for your you could you could do

1:27:06.160 --> 1:27:09.120
<v Speaker 1>that too. I've also seen win loss or total points

1:27:09.160 --> 1:27:13.519
<v Speaker 1>from the year before plus the weeks that you played. Alright, guys,

1:27:13.520 --> 1:27:17.120
<v Speaker 1>we've got about two and a half minutes left in

1:27:17.160 --> 1:27:19.760
<v Speaker 1>this show. Let's zip through some of our sleepers, our

1:27:19.800 --> 1:27:22.200
<v Speaker 1>favorite sleepers, and I will begin with Brian Johnson, your

1:27:22.240 --> 1:27:24.240
<v Speaker 1>sleeper this week. Al Right, Well, that's not enough time

1:27:24.280 --> 1:27:26.000
<v Speaker 1>for me to dive into Dan Arnold. I'll do that

1:27:26.040 --> 1:27:29.120
<v Speaker 1>next week. I'm gonna go with Steven Simms h Washington,

1:27:29.160 --> 1:27:32.120
<v Speaker 1>who should be the number two wide receiver for Washington

1:27:32.200 --> 1:27:36.000
<v Speaker 1>football team. This year. Uh, Sims ran only routes from

1:27:36.040 --> 1:27:38.760
<v Speaker 1>the slot or from the boundary. Last year most came

1:27:38.760 --> 1:27:40.360
<v Speaker 1>from the slot, but over the last four games he

1:27:40.400 --> 1:27:46.519
<v Speaker 1>had a massive target share of He should see more

1:27:46.560 --> 1:27:49.519
<v Speaker 1>work on the outside, and he'll see some creative usage

1:27:49.520 --> 1:27:53.200
<v Speaker 1>from new o c Scott Turner who came over from Jacksonville. H.

1:27:53.320 --> 1:27:55.200
<v Speaker 1>He'll be used the same way to used Curtis Samuel.

1:27:55.200 --> 1:27:57.559
<v Speaker 1>We'll see a lot of handoffs to Steven Sims and Uh,

1:27:57.720 --> 1:28:00.679
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna be starter worthy this year. And Nancy Football

1:28:01.160 --> 1:28:04.599
<v Speaker 1>big guys too. Yeah. Absolutely, all right, Scott your sleeper

1:28:04.840 --> 1:28:09.880
<v Speaker 1>this week. Jonta Johnson currently going wide receiver round U

1:28:10.120 --> 1:28:12.680
<v Speaker 1>lead all rookies and receptions last year, and that was

1:28:12.760 --> 1:28:15.200
<v Speaker 1>with dent Head and the duck throwing and passes last

1:28:15.280 --> 1:28:21.759
<v Speaker 1>ye so big bend back. They've been known as support

1:28:21.760 --> 1:28:26.000
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver to wide receivers forever. Uh. And I think

1:28:26.000 --> 1:28:28.760
<v Speaker 1>he's I think he's the beneficiary. All right. I am

1:28:28.800 --> 1:28:31.519
<v Speaker 1>going to go with Zack Moss, who is my either

1:28:31.600 --> 1:28:35.200
<v Speaker 1>my favorite or my second favorite sleeper for this offseason,

1:28:35.280 --> 1:28:38.200
<v Speaker 1>and I'll save the other guy for next week. Let's

1:28:38.200 --> 1:28:40.200
<v Speaker 1>talk Zack Moss. He's the running back for Buffalo taken

1:28:40.200 --> 1:28:42.720
<v Speaker 1>in the third round. Great in college at Utah. He

1:28:42.800 --> 1:28:46.679
<v Speaker 1>left Utah's the all time leading rusher all time. He's

1:28:46.720 --> 1:28:49.559
<v Speaker 1>a bigger, powerful back, He's difficult to tackle, he's got

1:28:49.600 --> 1:28:53.640
<v Speaker 1>good hands. He's not fast, but he plays fast. And

1:28:53.760 --> 1:28:56.679
<v Speaker 1>most importantly, it's about opportunity and where he fits into

1:28:56.720 --> 1:29:00.200
<v Speaker 1>this Buffalo offense. He inherits the job left behind by

1:29:00.200 --> 1:29:04.200
<v Speaker 1>the undead corpse of Frank Gore. Gore last year had

1:29:04.360 --> 1:29:08.240
<v Speaker 1>nothing left in the tank at all, and he's still

1:29:08.280 --> 1:29:12.080
<v Speaker 1>garnered almost two touches last year. And those two otter

1:29:12.160 --> 1:29:14.280
<v Speaker 1>touches are gonna go to Zack Moss, who's gonna do

1:29:14.320 --> 1:29:17.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot more with them than Frank Gore could. Now.

1:29:17.479 --> 1:29:20.679
<v Speaker 1>Most importantly, and Brian alluded to this earlier in the show,

1:29:20.760 --> 1:29:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Devin Singletary only was given two carries from inside the five.

1:29:24.400 --> 1:29:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Last year, Frank Gore had eighteen carries inside the the

1:29:27.840 --> 1:29:32.040
<v Speaker 1>ten and eleven carries inside the five scored twice. That's it.

1:29:32.479 --> 1:29:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Zack Moss, built for goal line use, is going to

1:29:35.360 --> 1:29:38.400
<v Speaker 1>be much more successful and is going to do much

1:29:38.439 --> 1:29:41.800
<v Speaker 1>more with those juicy carries near the stripe. I love

1:29:41.960 --> 1:29:46.720
<v Speaker 1>him to be potentially a double digit guy as a

1:29:46.840 --> 1:29:50.559
<v Speaker 1>possibility for touchdowns this year because if you look at

1:29:50.600 --> 1:29:53.760
<v Speaker 1>the eleven touchdowns are the eleven carries of Frank Corrians

1:29:53.760 --> 1:29:56.200
<v Speaker 1>inside the five, you you want to convert those like rate,

1:29:56.479 --> 1:29:58.880
<v Speaker 1>you get five six touchdowns just out of carries inside

1:29:58.880 --> 1:30:01.439
<v Speaker 1>the five. Devin single Tarry is just not going to

1:30:01.560 --> 1:30:05.880
<v Speaker 1>get those kind of of numbers. And Zack Moss might

1:30:06.080 --> 1:30:08.840
<v Speaker 1>be better at the what Devon single theory does best.

1:30:09.120 --> 1:30:11.240
<v Speaker 1>That Boss might do all those things better than single

1:30:11.280 --> 1:30:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Dary too, and just totally leave him on the sidelines

1:30:15.000 --> 1:30:17.040
<v Speaker 1>point of the season. Yeah, it's you know, and Devon's

1:30:17.040 --> 1:30:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Singletary is a good back. I'm not knocking devil Devon Singletary,

1:30:19.920 --> 1:30:22.000
<v Speaker 1>but he is what he is. He is a smaller,

1:30:22.560 --> 1:30:26.080
<v Speaker 1>speedier scat back. He kind of guy, and there's a

1:30:26.120 --> 1:30:28.000
<v Speaker 1>reason they drafted Zack Moss and they're going to use

1:30:28.080 --> 1:30:31.080
<v Speaker 1>him right away. Thank you for listening, everybody. I encourage

1:30:31.080 --> 1:30:33.639
<v Speaker 1>you to check out the contests and leagues at Guillotine

1:30:33.760 --> 1:30:36.439
<v Speaker 1>leagues dot com. It's the hottest, freshest new format in

1:30:36.479 --> 1:30:39.880
<v Speaker 1>fantasy football, and be sure to check out this podcast

1:30:40.240 --> 1:30:42.839
<v Speaker 1>and take the time to rate and review the podcast

1:30:42.880 --> 1:30:44.680
<v Speaker 1>as well. Always grateful for the people that get to

1:30:44.720 --> 1:30:46.120
<v Speaker 1>the end of the show and take the time to

1:30:46.120 --> 1:30:52.960
<v Speaker 1>do that. We'll talk to you next week, everybody, Bye bye.

1:30:54.040 --> 1:30:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football Weekly is a production of I heart Radio.

1:30:57.360 --> 1:30:59.479
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts from my heart Radio, visit the i

1:30:59.640 --> 1:31:02.760
<v Speaker 1>heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to

1:31:02.800 --> 1:31:03.679
<v Speaker 1>your favorite shows.