WEBVTT - Bloomberg Wall Street Week: Keating, Feeney, Drexler

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:05.000
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Wall Street Week. Market shruggle, higher consumer prizes.

0:00:05.040 --> 0:00:07.400
<v Speaker 1>The economy is in the process of rebounding. Will the

0:00:07.400 --> 0:00:10.479
<v Speaker 1>Federal Reserve have its own digital currency? The financial stories

0:00:10.520 --> 0:00:12.879
<v Speaker 1>that cheap hard work. Many people think the eels are

0:00:12.880 --> 0:00:15.080
<v Speaker 1>just going to keep marching up. We have more spending

0:00:15.120 --> 0:00:17.160
<v Speaker 1>coming out of Congress. One of the big questions I

0:00:17.200 --> 0:00:19.880
<v Speaker 1>think on investor's minds inflation through the eyes of the

0:00:19.880 --> 0:00:23.560
<v Speaker 1>most influential voices. Larry Summer is the former Treasury Secretary

0:00:23.640 --> 0:00:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Bryan Wynahan a backup America Will Saro CEO Charlie Sharp.

0:00:27.360 --> 0:00:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg wool Street Week with David Weston from Bloomberg Radio,

0:00:32.520 --> 0:00:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Geopolitics to the forefront, even as the economy stays hot.

0:00:36.600 --> 0:00:39.760
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Wall Street Week. I'm David Weston. It

0:00:39.840 --> 0:00:42.040
<v Speaker 1>was a week when we woke up every morning and

0:00:42.080 --> 0:00:45.440
<v Speaker 1>looked to see whether Europe was still intact with concerns

0:00:45.440 --> 0:00:49.120
<v Speaker 1>about a possible Russian invasion of Ukraine, despite President Putin's

0:00:49.159 --> 0:00:51.720
<v Speaker 1>protests to the contrary, even as he said he was

0:00:51.800 --> 0:00:54.760
<v Speaker 1>running out of patients and appearing with the German Chancellor

0:00:54.840 --> 0:00:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Schultz suggesting bombing might be necessary to stop what he

0:00:58.360 --> 0:01:01.880
<v Speaker 1>called a genocide. We should allow me to add that

0:01:01.960 --> 0:01:04.440
<v Speaker 1>in our assessments, what is happening now in the don

0:01:04.520 --> 0:01:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Bass constitutes genocide. But while we were all focused on Ukraine,

0:01:09.640 --> 0:01:12.399
<v Speaker 1>we had more indications of just how hot the U

0:01:12.440 --> 0:01:15.720
<v Speaker 1>s economy really is, with retail sales nombers for January

0:01:15.760 --> 0:01:21.679
<v Speaker 1>surprisingly high retail sales, a strong advance in January, a

0:01:21.760 --> 0:01:25.040
<v Speaker 1>big rebound from what we saw in the month of December,

0:01:25.440 --> 0:01:28.880
<v Speaker 1>and corporate earnings continue to pour in with mixed results

0:01:29.080 --> 0:01:32.679
<v Speaker 1>from paramount CEO Bob Bakish falling short of expectations because

0:01:32.720 --> 0:01:37.000
<v Speaker 1>of his streaming investments. We would have peak streaming losses

0:01:37.520 --> 0:01:42.400
<v Speaker 1>UH in terms of investment in UH, and then they

0:01:42.440 --> 0:01:45.160
<v Speaker 1>would improve from there, which would return the company to

0:01:45.240 --> 0:01:48.720
<v Speaker 1>total earnings growth in twenty four and beyond. But in

0:01:48.800 --> 0:01:51.880
<v Speaker 1>the end, the geopolitics and continued concern about the Fed

0:01:51.960 --> 0:01:54.600
<v Speaker 1>one out over any positive news of the week, as

0:01:54.640 --> 0:01:57.080
<v Speaker 1>the Spire was down for a second week in a row,

0:01:57.120 --> 0:01:59.440
<v Speaker 1>this time by one point six putting it off by

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:02.360
<v Speaker 1>nine said for the year. Today, the NAZAC fell by

0:02:02.400 --> 0:02:05.120
<v Speaker 1>one point seven six percent on the week, while bonds

0:02:05.200 --> 0:02:08.160
<v Speaker 1>fluctuated but ended up not far from where they started

0:02:08.280 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 1>with the yield in the tenure continue to hover just

0:02:10.800 --> 0:02:14.840
<v Speaker 1>over one and oil actually was down despite all the

0:02:14.880 --> 0:02:17.840
<v Speaker 1>anxiety over Ukraine, ending up at about ninety three dollars

0:02:17.840 --> 0:02:20.600
<v Speaker 1>of barrel for Brent. To put this all in perspective.

0:02:20.639 --> 0:02:23.239
<v Speaker 1>We welcome now Katherine Keating, she's CEO of b N

0:02:23.360 --> 0:02:27.360
<v Speaker 1>y Melon Wealth Management and Joanne Feeny Advisers Capital Management

0:02:27.400 --> 0:02:30.120
<v Speaker 1>portfolio Manager. Thank you both for being your welcome back

0:02:30.120 --> 0:02:31.760
<v Speaker 1>to walstere Week. Joe, and let me start with you

0:02:31.800 --> 0:02:34.120
<v Speaker 1>on this geopolitics. As you talked to your clients, how

0:02:34.160 --> 0:02:38.040
<v Speaker 1>concerned are they about this? What do you tell them? Well,

0:02:38.040 --> 0:02:41.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, in the last week, I've actually feeled a

0:02:41.160 --> 0:02:43.480
<v Speaker 1>number of calls with clients and some of them ask,

0:02:43.560 --> 0:02:45.959
<v Speaker 1>you know, why aren't more people talking a bit about

0:02:45.960 --> 0:02:49.240
<v Speaker 1>this on the investment front. So they're clearly concerned about

0:02:49.320 --> 0:02:52.120
<v Speaker 1>the you know, tensions in Ukraine, what we seem to

0:02:52.120 --> 0:02:55.360
<v Speaker 1>be escalating um in addition to the concerns we've been

0:02:55.360 --> 0:02:57.640
<v Speaker 1>talking about for months like inflation and interest rates and

0:02:57.720 --> 0:03:00.680
<v Speaker 1>slowing economic growth. So you know, they want to know

0:03:00.919 --> 0:03:03.079
<v Speaker 1>if they need to do anything different in their portfolios.

0:03:03.120 --> 0:03:05.359
<v Speaker 1>Do we need to change things for them um or

0:03:05.400 --> 0:03:08.480
<v Speaker 1>are they well positioned, and the answer that comes down to, really,

0:03:08.600 --> 0:03:11.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, what's their time frame. We've seen the world

0:03:11.720 --> 0:03:16.680
<v Speaker 1>confront pandemics, wars, recessions, the stock markets suffers for a

0:03:16.680 --> 0:03:20.000
<v Speaker 1>while but eventually recovers. So the time horizon for the

0:03:20.040 --> 0:03:23.680
<v Speaker 1>investor really matters here as well. There risk tolerance for

0:03:23.760 --> 0:03:26.639
<v Speaker 1>suffering through the volatility. So there are solutions out there,

0:03:26.880 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 1>and the solution really depends on the the individual investor. Yeah,

0:03:31.200 --> 0:03:32.960
<v Speaker 1>I agree with that, Joanne. And in fact, when we

0:03:33.000 --> 0:03:36.120
<v Speaker 1>think about geopolitical events, believe it or not, they tend

0:03:36.160 --> 0:03:39.160
<v Speaker 1>to have very short lived impact on the markets. What

0:03:39.360 --> 0:03:42.680
<v Speaker 1>really matters is the larger ecosystem in which they're happening.

0:03:42.680 --> 0:03:45.720
<v Speaker 1>So if we think about nine eleven terrible, terrible tragedy,

0:03:46.320 --> 0:03:49.000
<v Speaker 1>markets closed for four days. When they reopened the following week,

0:03:49.040 --> 0:03:51.680
<v Speaker 1>you had a very significant sell off, but within two

0:03:51.720 --> 0:03:55.400
<v Speaker 1>months that had actually been recovered. What was more important

0:03:55.560 --> 0:03:58.040
<v Speaker 1>was the was the ecosystem that that happened, and we

0:03:58.040 --> 0:04:02.080
<v Speaker 1>were already in a bear market on the tech bubble bursting,

0:04:02.440 --> 0:04:04.840
<v Speaker 1>and that market continued for a couple of years. I

0:04:04.880 --> 0:04:07.400
<v Speaker 1>think the other thing that is important when you're thinking

0:04:07.440 --> 0:04:11.360
<v Speaker 1>about war is um you know, worst take time right,

0:04:11.480 --> 0:04:13.320
<v Speaker 1>We've we've learned that as a country, they take time,

0:04:13.520 --> 0:04:17.640
<v Speaker 1>they can really impact your fiscal budget for a very

0:04:17.640 --> 0:04:20.160
<v Speaker 1>long time. Well. Part of the ecosystem, though, Catherine, order

0:04:20.279 --> 0:04:23.600
<v Speaker 1>is just volatility. We already had volative because the uncertainty

0:04:23.600 --> 0:04:25.960
<v Speaker 1>about the FED triggered by the inflation of the factors.

0:04:26.160 --> 0:04:29.840
<v Speaker 1>So putting more volatility into that more uncertainty, what does

0:04:29.839 --> 0:04:31.640
<v Speaker 1>that do to you as an investor? How do you

0:04:31.720 --> 0:04:34.320
<v Speaker 1>how do you deal with that kind of volatility going forward? Catherine,

0:04:34.440 --> 0:04:36.880
<v Speaker 1>so Joanne said it right, time horizon matters, and for

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:39.640
<v Speaker 1>most investors, their time horizon is actually quite long. They're

0:04:39.640 --> 0:04:42.640
<v Speaker 1>saving for their retirement or maybe even their children and grandchildren,

0:04:42.920 --> 0:04:45.679
<v Speaker 1>and so you can withstand volatility if your time horizon

0:04:45.760 --> 0:04:48.359
<v Speaker 1>is long. The other thing I would say about volatility is,

0:04:48.640 --> 0:04:51.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, when we come out of a recession at

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:53.839
<v Speaker 1>a bear market, as we did over the last two years,

0:04:54.240 --> 0:04:58.320
<v Speaker 1>those early months and years, everything goes in the same direction,

0:04:58.360 --> 0:05:00.760
<v Speaker 1>it goes up. You don't have the nor more volatility,

0:05:00.800 --> 0:05:03.080
<v Speaker 1>and we haven't. But in fact, when you look at

0:05:03.080 --> 0:05:07.280
<v Speaker 1>the s MP five hundred, the average intra year correction

0:05:07.400 --> 0:05:10.800
<v Speaker 1>over time is and yet seventy percent of the time

0:05:10.800 --> 0:05:12.479
<v Speaker 1>the market ends up by the end of the year.

0:05:13.120 --> 0:05:15.599
<v Speaker 1>This is normal volatility. It just may not feel that

0:05:15.640 --> 0:05:18.960
<v Speaker 1>way right now. Joanne entering Chasm just talked about a

0:05:18.960 --> 0:05:21.160
<v Speaker 1>bear market. Is it possible we are entering into a

0:05:21.200 --> 0:05:23.039
<v Speaker 1>bear market right now? Well, in some areas of the

0:05:23.040 --> 0:05:25.719
<v Speaker 1>stock market, we're already in a bear market, alright. Look

0:05:25.760 --> 0:05:28.320
<v Speaker 1>at info tech, look at other areas of growth, some

0:05:28.400 --> 0:05:31.680
<v Speaker 1>areas of consumer discretionary communication services. A lot of these

0:05:31.720 --> 0:05:34.080
<v Speaker 1>stocks have come down, you know, well more than ten

0:05:34.120 --> 0:05:37.359
<v Speaker 1>percent um and there multiples have come down accordingly. And

0:05:37.400 --> 0:05:40.560
<v Speaker 1>that started before really the UK intentions really heated up,

0:05:40.560 --> 0:05:43.000
<v Speaker 1>and it was primarily triggered by the FED signaling that

0:05:43.040 --> 0:05:45.320
<v Speaker 1>they were going to be raising rates and when rates

0:05:45.400 --> 0:05:48.600
<v Speaker 1>actually rose. But you know, back to Catherine's point on

0:05:48.600 --> 0:05:52.080
<v Speaker 1>on the environment in which this higher risk has now arrived.

0:05:52.520 --> 0:05:54.480
<v Speaker 1>We we are the U S economy and the global

0:05:54.480 --> 0:05:56.640
<v Speaker 1>economy still in the midst of a recovery from the

0:05:56.680 --> 0:05:59.880
<v Speaker 1>worst of the pandemic. So we have a backdrop of

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:05.520
<v Speaker 1>production increasing, whether it's in industrials, consumer products, housing market, right,

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:08.120
<v Speaker 1>and these are all trends that are likely to continue

0:06:08.520 --> 0:06:11.839
<v Speaker 1>despite what is happening in the Ukraine, because you know,

0:06:12.000 --> 0:06:14.840
<v Speaker 1>there's more and more production coming online cars for example,

0:06:14.839 --> 0:06:17.760
<v Speaker 1>it's really been held back and that should ease in

0:06:17.800 --> 0:06:20.919
<v Speaker 1>the back half of the year, for example, as semiconductor production.

0:06:21.320 --> 0:06:23.839
<v Speaker 1>A new factories come online starting in the middle of

0:06:23.880 --> 0:06:27.680
<v Speaker 1>this year. So the economic environment is actually fairly positive.

0:06:28.000 --> 0:06:31.560
<v Speaker 1>We worry, though, right about the Ukraine situation and how

0:06:31.600 --> 0:06:33.839
<v Speaker 1>the sanctions that may end up being triggered if this

0:06:33.920 --> 0:06:38.080
<v Speaker 1>really goes forward, will affect particularly the European economy. Thank

0:06:38.120 --> 0:06:40.039
<v Speaker 1>you so much, Katherine Keating and Joe A. Fini. They're

0:06:40.040 --> 0:06:41.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna be staying with us as we turned to the

0:06:41.680 --> 0:06:43.919
<v Speaker 1>question of what we should expect from the rest of

0:06:43.960 --> 0:06:46.160
<v Speaker 1>the year. That's gonna be up next on Wall Street

0:06:46.160 --> 0:06:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Week on Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg Wall Street Week with

0:06:58.800 --> 0:07:03.240
<v Speaker 1>David weston draw Bloomberg Radio. We are back with Joe

0:07:03.240 --> 0:07:06.400
<v Speaker 1>and Feeni of Advisor's Capital Management and Katherine Keating of

0:07:06.440 --> 0:07:09.200
<v Speaker 1>bny Melon Wealth Management. So Canton, when we come to you,

0:07:09.560 --> 0:07:11.640
<v Speaker 1>we add this discussion, good discussion. I was going to

0:07:11.680 --> 0:07:12.800
<v Speaker 1>ask you about the rest of the year where the

0:07:12.840 --> 0:07:16.320
<v Speaker 1>sp forget that, what about inflation, because that's what everyone's

0:07:16.360 --> 0:07:18.760
<v Speaker 1>talking about. Where do you see inflation now and where's

0:07:18.760 --> 0:07:20.200
<v Speaker 1>it going the rest of the year. Do you think

0:07:20.600 --> 0:07:22.640
<v Speaker 1>it is the most important question? Actually, and it's the

0:07:22.640 --> 0:07:24.600
<v Speaker 1>first one on everybody's minds. And I think to really

0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:27.560
<v Speaker 1>understand that, we have to step back and reflect for

0:07:27.600 --> 0:07:29.720
<v Speaker 1>a moment on what we've been through. As I said,

0:07:29.760 --> 0:07:32.240
<v Speaker 1>we were in a healthy business cycle that got interrupted

0:07:32.240 --> 0:07:35.560
<v Speaker 1>by a health recession, not a normal recession, a health recession.

0:07:35.880 --> 0:07:38.160
<v Speaker 1>People were getting sick from this terrible virus that made

0:07:38.200 --> 0:07:41.240
<v Speaker 1>the economy sick. And then we got an unusual kind

0:07:41.240 --> 0:07:44.760
<v Speaker 1>of medicine. Right, we got this six trillion dollars in

0:07:44.760 --> 0:07:49.040
<v Speaker 1>fiscal stimulus in this country, which really changed some things

0:07:49.240 --> 0:07:51.640
<v Speaker 1>in the recession. The first thing it changed is incomes

0:07:51.640 --> 0:07:55.200
<v Speaker 1>didn't go down. That's very unusual. Incomes didn't go down,

0:07:55.520 --> 0:07:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Spending didn't go down. That's very unusual. Normally in a pandemic,

0:07:58.880 --> 0:08:02.280
<v Speaker 1>we tighten our belts. It happened was people kept spending,

0:08:02.280 --> 0:08:05.200
<v Speaker 1>but they shifted their spending two goods. Right. We weren't

0:08:05.200 --> 0:08:07.880
<v Speaker 1>buying services, we weren't going on vacation, but we were

0:08:07.920 --> 0:08:10.160
<v Speaker 1>buying goods. All the things we needed to work at home.

0:08:10.240 --> 0:08:13.960
<v Speaker 1>The UM laptops and computers and monitors and all of

0:08:14.000 --> 0:08:17.080
<v Speaker 1>those things. UM and and all the things we needed

0:08:17.080 --> 0:08:19.040
<v Speaker 1>to do life everything in our lives at home, and

0:08:19.040 --> 0:08:21.160
<v Speaker 1>we're we're I think we're starting to get past some

0:08:21.240 --> 0:08:23.600
<v Speaker 1>of that. We see some of the um. You know,

0:08:24.000 --> 0:08:26.320
<v Speaker 1>it's sort of economics one oh one, right, you have

0:08:26.400 --> 0:08:28.640
<v Speaker 1>all of this demand for goods and you don't have

0:08:28.680 --> 0:08:31.080
<v Speaker 1>the supply to get them. We see that starting to

0:08:31.120 --> 0:08:33.280
<v Speaker 1>correct a little bit. The fourth quarter was really a

0:08:33.320 --> 0:08:36.720
<v Speaker 1>story about restocking inventories, and so I think the question

0:08:36.760 --> 0:08:41.400
<v Speaker 1>about inflation is does the torrid pace of consumers buying

0:08:41.559 --> 0:08:44.640
<v Speaker 1>goods start to come off of its peak and do

0:08:44.720 --> 0:08:48.520
<v Speaker 1>we see more normal behavior which is shifting two services?

0:08:50.360 --> 0:08:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Joe and aswer that question. Sure, that's exactly right. I'll

0:08:53.840 --> 0:08:56.079
<v Speaker 1>put on my economists at here for a second. But

0:08:56.280 --> 0:08:59.880
<v Speaker 1>uh yeah, when you have this demand so high, it's

0:09:00.000 --> 0:09:02.240
<v Speaker 1>apply not able to catch up, and interest rates not

0:09:02.440 --> 0:09:06.160
<v Speaker 1>rising for various reasons, the only place the pressure valve

0:09:06.240 --> 0:09:09.600
<v Speaker 1>can you know, can be turned is on the inflation front.

0:09:09.920 --> 0:09:12.200
<v Speaker 1>And we should, towards the middle of this year start

0:09:12.280 --> 0:09:15.840
<v Speaker 1>to lack some of the biggest price increases. So with

0:09:16.000 --> 0:09:20.079
<v Speaker 1>fiscal spending less um than last year, uh, and with

0:09:20.200 --> 0:09:23.040
<v Speaker 1>a shift back over to services spending, we're already seeing

0:09:23.040 --> 0:09:26.400
<v Speaker 1>that in the mobility data. More travel, more hotel bookings,

0:09:26.520 --> 0:09:29.400
<v Speaker 1>more Airbnb bookings coming. That should take a lot of

0:09:29.400 --> 0:09:32.800
<v Speaker 1>the pressure off inflation, uh is, particularly in the beginning

0:09:32.800 --> 0:09:35.080
<v Speaker 1>of the year. Plus more supplies I mentioned before, more

0:09:35.160 --> 0:09:37.720
<v Speaker 1>chips from the semiconductor companies mean more cars can be

0:09:37.760 --> 0:09:41.120
<v Speaker 1>produced and everything else. Um. You know, on the other hand,

0:09:41.120 --> 0:09:42.880
<v Speaker 1>that we have to worry a little bit about the

0:09:42.960 --> 0:09:46.840
<v Speaker 1>labor situation because the pandemic did trigger an awful lot

0:09:46.880 --> 0:09:50.000
<v Speaker 1>of people to just leave the workforce, particularly the baby

0:09:50.000 --> 0:09:52.760
<v Speaker 1>boomer generation, and they're not likely to come back. So

0:09:52.800 --> 0:09:54.920
<v Speaker 1>we have a shortage of labor. We're going to have

0:09:55.000 --> 0:09:57.640
<v Speaker 1>higher wages. That's going to continue to keep the upward

0:09:57.640 --> 0:10:00.800
<v Speaker 1>pressure on prices. But with the FEDS actions, with more

0:10:00.840 --> 0:10:03.400
<v Speaker 1>supply coming on, with the shift over to services spending,

0:10:04.040 --> 0:10:06.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's likely that the torrid pace of inflation

0:10:06.679 --> 0:10:09.200
<v Speaker 1>does ease a little bit through the course of this year,

0:10:09.720 --> 0:10:12.480
<v Speaker 1>but it's going to take some time. Probably inflation gets

0:10:12.480 --> 0:10:16.680
<v Speaker 1>worse as the housing price increases start to filter into

0:10:16.720 --> 0:10:20.120
<v Speaker 1>the measured inflation numbers UM, as they've begun to do.

0:10:20.160 --> 0:10:22.000
<v Speaker 1>It's probably gonna get a little bit worse before it

0:10:22.040 --> 0:10:25.360
<v Speaker 1>actually gets better. Yeah, we would agree with that. And

0:10:25.360 --> 0:10:27.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, the thing about goods inflation is that it

0:10:28.200 --> 0:10:31.160
<v Speaker 1>tends not to be very high. Right, there's so much competition,

0:10:31.280 --> 0:10:34.520
<v Speaker 1>so many brands out there competing for consumer dollars. Uh.

0:10:34.640 --> 0:10:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Sticky inflation is what we really worry about. So we

0:10:37.000 --> 0:10:40.880
<v Speaker 1>worry about um, you know, rents and wages in particular.

0:10:40.880 --> 0:10:42.960
<v Speaker 1>And if you asked us about the one thing we're

0:10:42.960 --> 0:10:46.120
<v Speaker 1>most focused on, it is that increase in labor costs

0:10:46.120 --> 0:10:48.480
<v Speaker 1>because it's running at about four percent a year right now.

0:10:48.920 --> 0:10:51.839
<v Speaker 1>And what we need is for the FED to do

0:10:51.920 --> 0:10:54.319
<v Speaker 1>what it will do, which is raizor rates a bit.

0:10:54.720 --> 0:10:56.920
<v Speaker 1>We need employers to do what they want to do,

0:10:57.120 --> 0:11:01.000
<v Speaker 1>which is manage their costs and grow their prof fits um.

0:11:01.040 --> 0:11:03.600
<v Speaker 1>And we need employees to come back to the workforce.

0:11:03.679 --> 0:11:05.959
<v Speaker 1>And there are things that we're missing, right. We didn't

0:11:05.960 --> 0:11:08.960
<v Speaker 1>have the normal mobility and immigration over the last couple

0:11:09.000 --> 0:11:11.280
<v Speaker 1>of years, which is which is very important. We didn't

0:11:11.280 --> 0:11:13.440
<v Speaker 1>have mobility of people be able to move from one

0:11:13.440 --> 0:11:16.000
<v Speaker 1>place to another to take a job. UM. I think

0:11:16.040 --> 0:11:19.200
<v Speaker 1>the flexibility that a lot of businesses are adopting are

0:11:19.200 --> 0:11:22.839
<v Speaker 1>going to invite will invite people back to the workforce. UM.

0:11:22.880 --> 0:11:26.200
<v Speaker 1>And we need productivity, which actually we've been living a

0:11:26.240 --> 0:11:29.520
<v Speaker 1>productivity boom. That's how you recover corporate earnings and recover

0:11:29.840 --> 0:11:32.720
<v Speaker 1>all the GDP that was lost without with fewer workers.

0:11:32.720 --> 0:11:34.920
<v Speaker 1>We still have three million fewer workers. Joy. And you

0:11:34.960 --> 0:11:38.240
<v Speaker 1>talk about pressure on prices, what about pressure on portfolio managers?

0:11:38.480 --> 0:11:40.360
<v Speaker 1>Because in a world where you've got to or three

0:11:40.360 --> 0:11:42.960
<v Speaker 1>present inflation, a five percent return every year on your

0:11:42.960 --> 0:11:45.480
<v Speaker 1>portfolio looks pretty good. In a world of seven present inflation,

0:11:45.600 --> 0:11:48.040
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't look so good. Do you have investors basically saying,

0:11:48.120 --> 0:11:51.360
<v Speaker 1>wait a second, how can I keep up with this inflation? Yeah?

0:11:51.360 --> 0:11:53.840
<v Speaker 1>That's obviously more of a problem for those heavily exposed

0:11:53.880 --> 0:11:56.480
<v Speaker 1>to fixed income, right, and that's where there's gonna be

0:11:56.480 --> 0:11:59.040
<v Speaker 1>a real challenge in keeping up. But you know, when

0:11:59.040 --> 0:12:02.560
<v Speaker 1>you think about inflation and stock prices, you recognize that

0:12:02.640 --> 0:12:06.800
<v Speaker 1>the source of inflation is coming from companies raising prices.

0:12:07.240 --> 0:12:09.480
<v Speaker 1>They raise prices, that means their revenue goes up, that

0:12:09.480 --> 0:12:13.360
<v Speaker 1>means their earnings go up, and you know, commensurately, stock

0:12:13.400 --> 0:12:15.400
<v Speaker 1>prices tend to follow that. So there's a lot of

0:12:15.400 --> 0:12:19.520
<v Speaker 1>protection in stock prices for inflation. Plus you can always

0:12:19.559 --> 0:12:22.920
<v Speaker 1>direct your portfolio more towards the sort of companies that

0:12:22.960 --> 0:12:25.960
<v Speaker 1>do better when inflation and instrates are higher. That could

0:12:26.000 --> 0:12:27.959
<v Speaker 1>be banks, that could be real estate companies, that could

0:12:27.960 --> 0:12:30.880
<v Speaker 1>be energy companies. So there are ways to build protection

0:12:30.960 --> 0:12:33.080
<v Speaker 1>and we've been doing that for clients for for actually

0:12:33.160 --> 0:12:35.120
<v Speaker 1>quite a while now. So which stocks do you like

0:12:35.280 --> 0:12:39.040
<v Speaker 1>right now? Well, it depends on the sort of clients.

0:12:39.080 --> 0:12:41.480
<v Speaker 1>So for the sort of more conservative client, we're looking

0:12:41.520 --> 0:12:44.360
<v Speaker 1>for stocks that will deliver some dividend yield, for example,

0:12:44.720 --> 0:12:47.880
<v Speaker 1>but it also can appreciate. So in the tech world,

0:12:47.920 --> 0:12:51.679
<v Speaker 1>a company like Qualcom or Cisco for a safer play

0:12:51.679 --> 0:12:53.840
<v Speaker 1>of Philip Morris that has a very high dividend yield.

0:12:53.840 --> 0:12:56.360
<v Speaker 1>Than in the energy world, we like Chevron, we like

0:12:56.480 --> 0:12:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Kinder Morgan. You know, the energy demand is going to

0:12:59.120 --> 0:13:03.800
<v Speaker 1>continue to be strong because we do think the recovery continues. Plus,

0:13:03.840 --> 0:13:05.559
<v Speaker 1>by the way, that adds a little bit of insurance

0:13:05.920 --> 0:13:09.960
<v Speaker 1>against this uh, this Ukraine Russia situation. So Catherine, take

0:13:10.000 --> 0:13:11.200
<v Speaker 1>a look at the rest of the year. As you

0:13:11.240 --> 0:13:13.240
<v Speaker 1>look out, we can't know for sure what do you

0:13:13.240 --> 0:13:16.040
<v Speaker 1>anticipate And for the rest of it's been a rough

0:13:16.080 --> 0:13:17.720
<v Speaker 1>start to the year. I think it's fair to say

0:13:17.880 --> 0:13:21.640
<v Speaker 1>I think I would say that we anticipated coming back

0:13:21.679 --> 0:13:23.880
<v Speaker 1>to a new normal. And what do I mean by that.

0:13:24.360 --> 0:13:27.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean that we will still have economic growth, but

0:13:27.160 --> 0:13:29.520
<v Speaker 1>it will be lower than it was right maybe four

0:13:29.600 --> 0:13:32.920
<v Speaker 1>percent this year in the US, we continue to think

0:13:32.960 --> 0:13:35.800
<v Speaker 1>that stocks can do well, but it will be lower

0:13:35.840 --> 0:13:38.040
<v Speaker 1>than they were doing the last three years, actually when

0:13:38.040 --> 0:13:41.840
<v Speaker 1>the SMP five almost doubled. Um. We think that we

0:13:41.880 --> 0:13:44.640
<v Speaker 1>will have inflation, but we think we will transition to

0:13:44.720 --> 0:13:48.559
<v Speaker 1>a lower inflation rate. And in fact, the end point

0:13:48.559 --> 0:13:51.000
<v Speaker 1>of inflation really matters because if you if you have

0:13:51.040 --> 0:13:54.400
<v Speaker 1>inflation between three and four percent, you know over time

0:13:54.720 --> 0:13:56.959
<v Speaker 1>markets can do very well. That's what That's what it's

0:13:57.000 --> 0:13:59.720
<v Speaker 1>been for most of our careers. So the endpoint for

0:13:59.800 --> 0:14:02.679
<v Speaker 1>an lation really matters. Thank you so very much to

0:14:02.840 --> 0:14:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Katherine Keating of CEO of b n y Moan Wealth

0:14:05.679 --> 0:14:09.120
<v Speaker 1>Management and Joanne Pheenie and she's portfolio manager at Adviser's

0:14:09.320 --> 0:14:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Capital Management. Thank you so much for being with Wall

0:14:11.559 --> 0:14:18.439
<v Speaker 1>Street Week today. Coming up, retail sales are back up,

0:14:18.840 --> 0:14:21.360
<v Speaker 1>but how long will it last? And what's the next

0:14:21.440 --> 0:14:25.720
<v Speaker 1>new thing in retail? We ask retail guru Mickey Drexler.

0:14:26.560 --> 0:14:31.640
<v Speaker 1>I think so is the enemy of any retail. This

0:14:31.760 --> 0:14:36.920
<v Speaker 1>is Wall Street Week on Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg Wall

0:14:36.960 --> 0:14:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Street Week with David Weston from Bloomberg Radio. Everything seems

0:14:42.520 --> 0:14:46.200
<v Speaker 1>like it's going up. I still worry about prices increasing,

0:14:46.520 --> 0:14:49.280
<v Speaker 1>consumers spending. When it comes to the U. S. Economy,

0:14:49.320 --> 0:14:51.760
<v Speaker 1>it's one of the main indicators of how we're doing.

0:14:52.160 --> 0:14:54.760
<v Speaker 1>So after retail sales trailed off at the end of

0:14:54.840 --> 0:14:58.000
<v Speaker 1>last year, we breathed a collective sigh of relief when

0:14:58.040 --> 0:15:02.320
<v Speaker 1>they bounced back strongly up three point five percent in January,

0:15:02.360 --> 0:15:05.200
<v Speaker 1>although some of that was really from inflation an a

0:15:05.200 --> 0:15:08.120
<v Speaker 1>phenomenal basis. I say that very deliberately, of course, because

0:15:08.120 --> 0:15:11.360
<v Speaker 1>we saw also inflation spike in the month of January,

0:15:11.400 --> 0:15:14.800
<v Speaker 1>so we're not used to seeing these inflation and additional

0:15:14.880 --> 0:15:18.560
<v Speaker 1>juiced sales in retail sales. And the rest of two

0:15:18.640 --> 0:15:21.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe a challenging one for retailers as money from that

0:15:22.040 --> 0:15:27.400
<v Speaker 1>child tax credit expires. We are concerned that the expiration

0:15:27.400 --> 0:15:30.160
<v Speaker 1>of the child tax credit leaves millions of families without

0:15:30.240 --> 0:15:33.360
<v Speaker 1>that added source of income that they really need to

0:15:33.360 --> 0:15:35.720
<v Speaker 1>be able to support their families. Of course, it's not

0:15:35.760 --> 0:15:38.480
<v Speaker 1>only about how much we shop, but also about how

0:15:38.520 --> 0:15:41.800
<v Speaker 1>we shop with brick and mortar stores taking the biggest

0:15:41.840 --> 0:15:44.680
<v Speaker 1>hit in commercial real estate from the pandemic. And I

0:15:44.680 --> 0:15:48.240
<v Speaker 1>think there will be some conversions UM where possible away

0:15:48.280 --> 0:15:51.480
<v Speaker 1>from uses that are not slighted by one in more

0:15:51.560 --> 0:15:56.160
<v Speaker 1>retail being the top one even as online sales grew dramatically.

0:15:59.080 --> 0:16:00.920
<v Speaker 1>And when it comes to roots, OH, there's really only

0:16:01.000 --> 0:16:02.960
<v Speaker 1>one person we want to talk to, and that is

0:16:03.000 --> 0:16:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Mickey Drexler. He founded made Well an old Navy, He

0:16:06.120 --> 0:16:08.520
<v Speaker 1>ran the Gap and J Crew and built them into

0:16:08.600 --> 0:16:11.040
<v Speaker 1>behemus in the retail industry. And we're delighted to have

0:16:11.080 --> 0:16:12.880
<v Speaker 1>him on Wall Street Week now. Mickey, thank you so

0:16:12.960 --> 0:16:15.680
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us. Let's start with this pandemic. How

0:16:15.720 --> 0:16:19.400
<v Speaker 1>did it change the retail business? Well, I think it

0:16:19.560 --> 0:16:23.840
<v Speaker 1>changed it pretty dramatically. I also think the changes were

0:16:23.960 --> 0:16:28.400
<v Speaker 1>passed two way too many stores in America, which is

0:16:28.400 --> 0:16:34.040
<v Speaker 1>no secret overstowed UH. Certainly healthy online business around UH.

0:16:34.080 --> 0:16:37.480
<v Speaker 1>And I think it changed also, And I don't think

0:16:37.520 --> 0:16:41.600
<v Speaker 1>it's the pandemic that there's so many companies now UH

0:16:41.880 --> 0:16:46.680
<v Speaker 1>taking UH paying a lot of attention to statistics, I

0:16:46.760 --> 0:16:52.440
<v Speaker 1>think more than UH, more than merchandise. Lastly, I find

0:16:52.480 --> 0:16:56.440
<v Speaker 1>it difficult UH that many companies in my industry, at

0:16:56.480 --> 0:17:00.560
<v Speaker 1>least for them, are not going into an office every

0:17:00.640 --> 0:17:05.560
<v Speaker 1>day when it's critically important to see and touch merchandise.

0:17:06.280 --> 0:17:08.040
<v Speaker 1>But I think it's changed it that way. I think

0:17:08.240 --> 0:17:12.880
<v Speaker 1>clearly changed the way people addressed for the last year

0:17:12.960 --> 0:17:17.040
<v Speaker 1>or two, and this changes, dramatic change is always going on.

0:17:17.720 --> 0:17:19.720
<v Speaker 1>For a year, we've been up against what I called

0:17:19.760 --> 0:17:25.360
<v Speaker 1>a snowstorm easy year one, up against really bad numbers,

0:17:26.160 --> 0:17:30.320
<v Speaker 1>and I felt that starting this month February, that it

0:17:30.359 --> 0:17:34.840
<v Speaker 1>would get tougher again because the numbers aren't easy. People

0:17:34.880 --> 0:17:38.400
<v Speaker 1>all had pretty good years, actually surprisingly good, but they

0:17:38.400 --> 0:17:41.439
<v Speaker 1>really weren't that surprising if you figure what they were

0:17:41.560 --> 0:17:45.360
<v Speaker 1>up against. Uh the money stopped flowing from the government.

0:17:46.119 --> 0:17:50.440
<v Speaker 1>UH more difficult figures. And at the end of the day,

0:17:50.480 --> 0:17:53.480
<v Speaker 1>for me and always has been, I think the merchandise

0:17:53.600 --> 0:17:57.159
<v Speaker 1>matters the most. Business. What I hear, because you know,

0:17:57.359 --> 0:18:00.159
<v Speaker 1>I'm a small part of it, what I hear is

0:18:00.240 --> 0:18:04.399
<v Speaker 1>quite challenging and difficult. In February, and perhaps part of

0:18:04.840 --> 0:18:11.399
<v Speaker 1>January supply chain issues. Price of cotton has gone up,

0:18:11.640 --> 0:18:16.520
<v Speaker 1>I think about UH freight, so it's caused a lot

0:18:16.560 --> 0:18:20.440
<v Speaker 1>of inflation in our out business, and I think obviously

0:18:20.720 --> 0:18:24.320
<v Speaker 1>in the retail business, so it's not easier. I think

0:18:24.320 --> 0:18:27.840
<v Speaker 1>we're headed for much more difficult times. But by nature

0:18:28.000 --> 0:18:31.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm always pessimistic. Making Let me pick up on one

0:18:31.480 --> 0:18:34.119
<v Speaker 1>thing you've been talking about, and that is seeing and

0:18:34.160 --> 0:18:36.600
<v Speaker 1>feeling the merchandise. I know you, I know the kind

0:18:36.600 --> 0:18:38.760
<v Speaker 1>of retailer you are. You would walk around your stores

0:18:38.800 --> 0:18:41.240
<v Speaker 1>and get a real sense of the merchandise and the

0:18:41.240 --> 0:18:44.320
<v Speaker 1>interaction with people. How does that survive in an online

0:18:44.440 --> 0:18:47.760
<v Speaker 1>AI world where artificial intelligence, they're big data things like that,

0:18:47.960 --> 0:18:50.920
<v Speaker 1>or is that a thing in the past. If it

0:18:51.119 --> 0:18:54.840
<v Speaker 1>is the companies, I think, look, it's it's about product.

0:18:55.200 --> 0:18:58.399
<v Speaker 1>It's the only thing I know. Our business is extremely

0:18:58.560 --> 0:19:01.639
<v Speaker 1>song because you know we're small. But I sit with

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:04.480
<v Speaker 1>the merchants every day. I sit with design, not because

0:19:04.520 --> 0:19:06.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm the one with all the answers, because I've been

0:19:06.680 --> 0:19:08.560
<v Speaker 1>there and done it. I've seen the movie a lot,

0:19:08.880 --> 0:19:11.840
<v Speaker 1>and I've made every mistake in the book. The very

0:19:11.880 --> 0:19:13.920
<v Speaker 1>young people kind of think when I make a mistake,

0:19:14.160 --> 0:19:16.480
<v Speaker 1>they like to repeat that I made a mistake. I like.

0:19:17.320 --> 0:19:21.320
<v Speaker 1>But in retail, predicting what's going to sell is a

0:19:21.359 --> 0:19:23.359
<v Speaker 1>really important part of it. And the other thing is

0:19:23.960 --> 0:19:26.720
<v Speaker 1>knowing what's kind of a day and day have. This

0:19:26.920 --> 0:19:30.280
<v Speaker 1>is year to year, but I think, uh, you can't

0:19:30.359 --> 0:19:34.760
<v Speaker 1>be there in my opinion, without being and watching the

0:19:34.800 --> 0:19:39.680
<v Speaker 1>goods and business spontaneity, a creativity that happens. I met

0:19:39.680 --> 0:19:41.640
<v Speaker 1>a woman the other day who works in a company

0:19:41.680 --> 0:19:45.920
<v Speaker 1>fifteen people, uh, no office at all, and I said,

0:19:45.960 --> 0:19:48.239
<v Speaker 1>how can you run a retail business where you're not

0:19:48.680 --> 0:19:52.880
<v Speaker 1>uh looking and communicating? It's not just merchandise. I think,

0:19:52.880 --> 0:19:55.919
<v Speaker 1>I don't know the finances of your world, but I

0:19:55.960 --> 0:20:00.600
<v Speaker 1>know in my world, Uh, the creativity flows regularly. You

0:20:00.600 --> 0:20:04.000
<v Speaker 1>can get an idea anywhere, any place, at any time

0:20:04.400 --> 0:20:07.959
<v Speaker 1>based on what excites you, simulates you, or gives you

0:20:08.080 --> 0:20:11.359
<v Speaker 1>a bigger imagination. It's really great to have you with this, Mickey,

0:20:11.400 --> 0:20:13.280
<v Speaker 1>But as I say, the one man we always want

0:20:13.280 --> 0:20:18.119
<v Speaker 1>to hear from on retail that is Mickey Drexler. Coming up,

0:20:18.160 --> 0:20:20.600
<v Speaker 1>we wrap up the week with our special contributor Larry

0:20:20.680 --> 0:20:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Summers of Harvard. This is Wall Street Week on Bloomberg.

0:20:31.119 --> 0:20:35.120
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Wall Street Week with David Weston from

0:20:35.240 --> 0:20:38.119
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio. This is Wall Street Week. I'm David Weston,

0:20:38.200 --> 0:20:40.640
<v Speaker 1>and we're joined once again by our very special contributor

0:20:40.720 --> 0:20:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Larry Summers of Harvard. Larry, one of the things we've

0:20:43.680 --> 0:20:47.840
<v Speaker 1>talked about is inflation, but very specifically, are the supply

0:20:47.920 --> 0:20:50.000
<v Speaker 1>chain problems we're all seeing are they a cause of

0:20:50.040 --> 0:20:52.760
<v Speaker 1>the effect. A friend of Yours Mind and the Program,

0:20:52.880 --> 0:20:54.760
<v Speaker 1>Steve Rattner had a column New York Times to Day

0:20:54.880 --> 0:20:58.360
<v Speaker 1>basically saying supply chain is a symptom, it's not the disease.

0:20:58.400 --> 0:21:00.440
<v Speaker 1>What did you make of it? I think Steve broadly

0:21:00.520 --> 0:21:05.560
<v Speaker 1>right in distilling what serious economists believe. First of all,

0:21:06.080 --> 0:21:09.240
<v Speaker 1>the most of the goods where there's a bottleneck are

0:21:09.280 --> 0:21:14.400
<v Speaker 1>having abnormally large quantity, not abnormally small quantity. So obviously

0:21:14.440 --> 0:21:16.679
<v Speaker 1>if you have a big increase in demand, you're going

0:21:16.760 --> 0:21:21.080
<v Speaker 1>to encounter capacity limits. Second, what the supply chain people

0:21:21.240 --> 0:21:25.000
<v Speaker 1>ignore is that if more money is being spent, for example,

0:21:25.040 --> 0:21:28.920
<v Speaker 1>on used cars, yes, that's associated with higher used car prices,

0:21:29.000 --> 0:21:31.560
<v Speaker 1>but it means less money is being spent on other things,

0:21:31.840 --> 0:21:37.280
<v Speaker 1>and so it means less inflation in uh those sectors.

0:21:37.320 --> 0:21:41.200
<v Speaker 1>So while it's a widespread view, I think the interpretation

0:21:41.520 --> 0:21:46.480
<v Speaker 1>of inflation largely around supply chains is mostly a confusion

0:21:47.040 --> 0:21:50.720
<v Speaker 1>and mostly an evasion of what I predicted a year

0:21:50.720 --> 0:21:54.320
<v Speaker 1>ago that if we overflowed the bathtub, we're gonna get

0:21:54.320 --> 0:21:58.960
<v Speaker 1>an overflow as the economy overheated. Larry, one of the

0:21:58.960 --> 0:22:01.000
<v Speaker 1>things that we're hearing out of the Capitol Hill this

0:22:01.040 --> 0:22:03.680
<v Speaker 1>week is maybe it's not just all the FED that

0:22:03.720 --> 0:22:06.520
<v Speaker 1>can address the question of inflation. Maybe we should leave

0:22:07.000 --> 0:22:09.560
<v Speaker 1>alleviate some of the pressure on consumers by having a

0:22:09.680 --> 0:22:12.240
<v Speaker 1>hattus on the gas tax, the federal gas tax. What

0:22:12.280 --> 0:22:13.800
<v Speaker 1>do you think about things like that of limiting the

0:22:13.840 --> 0:22:16.960
<v Speaker 1>cost to consumers. I think we are plumbing the depths

0:22:17.080 --> 0:22:21.080
<v Speaker 1>of new bad ideas UH with that one. First of all,

0:22:21.119 --> 0:22:23.639
<v Speaker 1>guess prices are gonna fluctuate all over the place, so

0:22:23.720 --> 0:22:28.040
<v Speaker 1>nobody may see anything very substantial out of it. Second

0:22:28.119 --> 0:22:30.679
<v Speaker 1>of all, lower prices for gasoline will tend to be

0:22:30.760 --> 0:22:34.040
<v Speaker 1>offset by higher prices for other things as consumers have

0:22:34.480 --> 0:22:37.960
<v Speaker 1>higher incomes that are able to shift spending UH to

0:22:38.400 --> 0:22:42.680
<v Speaker 1>other spheres. Third, it runs exactly in the opposite direction

0:22:43.160 --> 0:22:45.119
<v Speaker 1>of all the things we're trying to do in the

0:22:45.240 --> 0:22:49.280
<v Speaker 1>environmental area. And fourth, you may get some if you

0:22:49.359 --> 0:22:52.800
<v Speaker 1>did get some little bit of deflationary shock when you

0:22:53.000 --> 0:22:55.920
<v Speaker 1>put the gas tax holiday into place, you're gonna get

0:22:55.960 --> 0:23:01.920
<v Speaker 1>some offsetting inflationary shock. When you move the gas tax,

0:23:02.240 --> 0:23:05.119
<v Speaker 1>it goes in exactly the opposite direction of paying for

0:23:05.160 --> 0:23:10.320
<v Speaker 1>more infrastructure, which everybody thinks, uh, we need. Look, I

0:23:10.359 --> 0:23:14.200
<v Speaker 1>think there needs to be a lesson learned about gimmicks

0:23:14.240 --> 0:23:18.000
<v Speaker 1>that pull well, they're like sugar highs. They make you

0:23:18.080 --> 0:23:23.240
<v Speaker 1>feel good, but they really often don't redown to anybody's

0:23:23.359 --> 0:23:28.080
<v Speaker 1>anybody's substantial political benefit. What's remarkable is that all those

0:23:28.320 --> 0:23:33.040
<v Speaker 1>much discussed tax credits, the two thousand dollar checks that

0:23:33.080 --> 0:23:38.120
<v Speaker 1>we're getting mailed to everybody, did substantial economic damage and

0:23:38.240 --> 0:23:42.120
<v Speaker 1>nobody remembers them, so they didn't even deliver the political benefit.

0:23:42.480 --> 0:23:45.600
<v Speaker 1>So I hope we can step back and think about

0:23:45.680 --> 0:23:50.200
<v Speaker 1>doing the right thing and move a bit away from

0:23:50.240 --> 0:23:53.080
<v Speaker 1>trendy gimmicks. As you have pointed out more than once,

0:23:53.520 --> 0:23:55.919
<v Speaker 1>we have a mismatch between supply and demand, not just

0:23:55.960 --> 0:23:58.800
<v Speaker 1>in goods but also in labor. Right now, you've just

0:23:58.920 --> 0:24:01.240
<v Speaker 1>co authored a piece that I saw this week really

0:24:01.280 --> 0:24:03.960
<v Speaker 1>analyzing what the cause of that work is. It's really

0:24:04.000 --> 0:24:07.040
<v Speaker 1>again a supply problem or demand problem. What did you conclude?

0:24:07.200 --> 0:24:12.320
<v Speaker 1>I think it's more of a demand problem. Look, David,

0:24:12.440 --> 0:24:17.760
<v Speaker 1>we have by a wide margin the highest ratio of

0:24:18.119 --> 0:24:22.359
<v Speaker 1>vacancies jobs that need to be filled too unemployed people

0:24:22.520 --> 0:24:26.639
<v Speaker 1>that we've ever had. It can't be surprising in the

0:24:26.680 --> 0:24:31.639
<v Speaker 1>face of that that we're seeing very large nominal wage increases.

0:24:32.400 --> 0:24:36.600
<v Speaker 1>And if you talk to businesses, they almost all feel

0:24:36.680 --> 0:24:40.200
<v Speaker 1>that they can pass those wages on in the form

0:24:40.240 --> 0:24:44.720
<v Speaker 1>of higher prices. And so that is the roots of

0:24:44.760 --> 0:24:50.840
<v Speaker 1>our inflation UH problem. Many people say that it's not entrenched,

0:24:50.840 --> 0:24:54.960
<v Speaker 1>there's no sign of a wage price spiral, not yet.

0:24:55.680 --> 0:24:58.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what would be a sign of an

0:24:58.800 --> 0:25:03.440
<v Speaker 1>incipient wage ace spiral. If an employment cost index approaching

0:25:03.480 --> 0:25:08.360
<v Speaker 1>six and uh CPI inflation rate in excess of seven

0:25:09.480 --> 0:25:14.560
<v Speaker 1>wasn't UH signs of a possible incipient waves price spiral.

0:25:14.880 --> 0:25:18.680
<v Speaker 1>So I think we've made a substantial problem of for ourselves.

0:25:19.119 --> 0:25:21.640
<v Speaker 1>And I think if we don't recognize that it's at

0:25:21.760 --> 0:25:27.199
<v Speaker 1>root a demand problem and we don't adjust UH monetary

0:25:27.280 --> 0:25:30.760
<v Speaker 1>policy in a substantial way, it's only going to become

0:25:30.800 --> 0:25:34.640
<v Speaker 1>a more serious problem. Letry going international here for a moment.

0:25:34.800 --> 0:25:37.560
<v Speaker 1>We now are going to have the Olympics conclude the

0:25:37.560 --> 0:25:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Winter Olympics. Overvisioning this coming weekend. UH. You were on

0:25:42.119 --> 0:25:44.520
<v Speaker 1>a panel I saw Institute of Politics up at Harvard

0:25:44.720 --> 0:25:48.480
<v Speaker 1>talking about China and how China is positioned right now globally,

0:25:48.800 --> 0:25:52.000
<v Speaker 1>suggesting maybe it's not quite as powerful as sometimes some

0:25:52.040 --> 0:25:54.560
<v Speaker 1>of us sometimes think. I think that's right. I think

0:25:54.600 --> 0:25:58.879
<v Speaker 1>we in the United States need to remember how wrong

0:25:59.000 --> 0:26:01.840
<v Speaker 1>we were in our active view of Russia in nineteen

0:26:01.920 --> 0:26:05.160
<v Speaker 1>sixty and how wrong we were in our collective view

0:26:05.960 --> 0:26:11.879
<v Speaker 1>of Japan in the early nineteen nineties, and consider the

0:26:11.960 --> 0:26:19.240
<v Speaker 1>possibility that we may be underestimating uh China's challenges now,

0:26:19.880 --> 0:26:24.880
<v Speaker 1>and we need to be particularly careful about being overly

0:26:25.640 --> 0:26:31.680
<v Speaker 1>uh provocative to them. Our provocations with respect to Russia

0:26:31.800 --> 0:26:38.359
<v Speaker 1>after nineteen sixty contributed UH, many historians believe to the

0:26:38.400 --> 0:26:42.159
<v Speaker 1>Cuban missile crisis, and so yes, we need to stand

0:26:42.240 --> 0:26:46.280
<v Speaker 1>up for our interests visa the China. But I think

0:26:46.280 --> 0:26:51.280
<v Speaker 1>we need to be quite careful, uh to avoid a

0:26:51.440 --> 0:26:57.919
<v Speaker 1>kind of strategic narcissism and truculence in the approach that

0:26:57.960 --> 0:27:00.520
<v Speaker 1>we take. Much of the news is we cause you know,

0:27:00.640 --> 0:27:04.159
<v Speaker 1>Lawry was occupied with the crisis over Ukraine between Russia

0:27:04.160 --> 0:27:05.800
<v Speaker 1>on the one hand, in the United States and NATO

0:27:05.840 --> 0:27:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Allis on the other. I noticed, for example, the President

0:27:08.640 --> 0:27:11.520
<v Speaker 1>she appeared with President Putin at the beginning of the Olympics.

0:27:11.680 --> 0:27:14.440
<v Speaker 1>What did you make of this geopolitical crisis and how

0:27:14.520 --> 0:27:17.320
<v Speaker 1>it fits into the world more broadly, and how long

0:27:17.440 --> 0:27:19.800
<v Speaker 1>lasting do you think the effects might be. Let me say,

0:27:19.920 --> 0:27:24.960
<v Speaker 1>David Uh that I'm not an expert on everything geopolitical,

0:27:25.520 --> 0:27:28.520
<v Speaker 1>but it seems to me that, as one who's been

0:27:28.520 --> 0:27:32.360
<v Speaker 1>critical in a number of areas, this has been handled

0:27:32.400 --> 0:27:37.440
<v Speaker 1>extremely well UH by the US administration. That doesn't mean

0:27:37.480 --> 0:27:40.719
<v Speaker 1>the ultimate outcome is going to be successful and then

0:27:40.760 --> 0:27:43.920
<v Speaker 1>an invasion is going to be forestalled, but I think

0:27:43.960 --> 0:27:47.600
<v Speaker 1>they've played the hand that they had in a very

0:27:47.680 --> 0:27:52.040
<v Speaker 1>skillful in a in a very skillful way. I think

0:27:52.080 --> 0:27:56.359
<v Speaker 1>this is a big deal. Not because Ukraine is economically powerful,

0:27:56.800 --> 0:28:01.040
<v Speaker 1>it isn't not even because Russia is economically powerful, It's

0:28:01.119 --> 0:28:06.200
<v Speaker 1>not that powerful. But I think the question of whether

0:28:06.920 --> 0:28:11.800
<v Speaker 1>there's some element of rule of international law and countries

0:28:11.920 --> 0:28:16.359
<v Speaker 1>can't invade other countries with impunity is an issue that

0:28:16.560 --> 0:28:21.320
<v Speaker 1>is very much here, and I think if this degrades,

0:28:22.119 --> 0:28:28.000
<v Speaker 1>that will have costs for everybody, sends of certainty, which

0:28:28.040 --> 0:28:33.200
<v Speaker 1>among other things, will affect the level of UH market valuations. Yeah,

0:28:33.200 --> 0:28:35.679
<v Speaker 1>which Nixon go to China was specifically supposed to undo,

0:28:35.880 --> 0:28:38.520
<v Speaker 1>is maybe undoing Henry Kissinger's work. Larry, thank you so

0:28:38.640 --> 0:28:41.600
<v Speaker 1>very much. That was very helpful. That's Larry Summers of Harvard,

0:28:41.600 --> 0:28:45.280
<v Speaker 1>our very special contributor here on Wall Street Week. Finally,

0:28:45.400 --> 0:28:49.640
<v Speaker 1>one more thought banking in the metaverse. Having troubles in

0:28:49.680 --> 0:28:52.080
<v Speaker 1>the world as we know it, worried about higher rates

0:28:52.160 --> 0:28:56.240
<v Speaker 1>or a possible recession, or tanks coming across the Ukraine border. Well,

0:28:56.400 --> 0:28:59.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe tech has the answer for you, and for all

0:28:59.080 --> 0:29:01.280
<v Speaker 1>of us for that matter. At this point, we've all

0:29:01.360 --> 0:29:05.040
<v Speaker 1>heard about the metaverse. That term taken from a sci

0:29:05.080 --> 0:29:07.640
<v Speaker 1>fi book from thirty years ago and appropriated by none

0:29:07.680 --> 0:29:12.560
<v Speaker 1>other than Mark Zuckerberg, who used it to rename Facebook Meta.

0:29:12.680 --> 0:29:14.120
<v Speaker 1>And this is what he had to say about it

0:29:14.120 --> 0:29:16.800
<v Speaker 1>when he made that announcement. It is time for us

0:29:17.160 --> 0:29:21.800
<v Speaker 1>to adopt a new company brand to encompass everything that

0:29:21.880 --> 0:29:26.400
<v Speaker 1>we do. Our company is now meta. This week, Mr

0:29:26.480 --> 0:29:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Zuckerberg took it a step further in a memo to

0:29:29.280 --> 0:29:32.280
<v Speaker 1>his staff, updating the company's values and what he called

0:29:32.440 --> 0:29:37.400
<v Speaker 1>its cultural operating system, summing it up as focused on meta,

0:29:37.800 --> 0:29:42.600
<v Speaker 1>meta mates and me. So Facebookers are now meta mats,

0:29:43.000 --> 0:29:45.360
<v Speaker 1>which reminds me, at least if when Disney bought ABC

0:29:45.440 --> 0:29:48.120
<v Speaker 1>and the company started addressing people like Peter Jennings and

0:29:48.160 --> 0:29:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Ted Couple as castmates and employee emails. Well, let's hope

0:29:52.280 --> 0:29:55.040
<v Speaker 1>that people at Meta embrace their new title with more

0:29:55.120 --> 0:29:57.360
<v Speaker 1>enthusiasm than some of the folks at ABC News did

0:29:57.680 --> 0:29:59.800
<v Speaker 1>back in the day. But it's not just met at

0:30:00.040 --> 0:30:04.000
<v Speaker 1>a Facebook that's embracing the metaverse. When Disney CEO Bob

0:30:04.120 --> 0:30:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Chapeck talked about his earnings just last week, he called

0:30:07.240 --> 0:30:11.160
<v Speaker 1>the metaverse a quote third dimension of storytelling. I think

0:30:11.160 --> 0:30:13.480
<v Speaker 1>it's a great opportunity for us. I think it's the

0:30:13.560 --> 0:30:16.440
<v Speaker 1>next great horizon for Disney. I think it's the next

0:30:16.440 --> 0:30:20.240
<v Speaker 1>great horizon and entertainment. And don't forget toys in this metaverse.

0:30:20.400 --> 0:30:24.280
<v Speaker 1>The CEO of Mattel certainly hasn't the metaverse n F

0:30:24.400 --> 0:30:28.880
<v Speaker 1>the s and other digital opportunities. Digital experiences will give

0:30:28.960 --> 0:30:32.680
<v Speaker 1>us an opportunity to engage with consumers and create another

0:30:32.800 --> 0:30:36.640
<v Speaker 1>opportunity for us to commercialize our brands and franchises in

0:30:36.720 --> 0:30:39.640
<v Speaker 1>other ways. To be sure, not everyone is sure what

0:30:39.720 --> 0:30:43.400
<v Speaker 1>exactly the metaverse is or whether it truly will change

0:30:43.440 --> 0:30:47.800
<v Speaker 1>the world. Here's Eileen Lee of Cowboy Ventures. I think

0:30:47.840 --> 0:30:50.880
<v Speaker 1>the metaverse is just like, what does that mean? Really?

0:30:52.760 --> 0:30:55.440
<v Speaker 1>It's if you mean the metaverse, like, are we all

0:30:55.480 --> 0:30:57.400
<v Speaker 1>going to be wearing the Arts headsets and staying in

0:30:57.440 --> 0:31:01.080
<v Speaker 1>our houses all the time? I think that's, you know,

0:31:01.360 --> 0:31:03.760
<v Speaker 1>if we're lucky enough to emerge from our caves after

0:31:03.800 --> 0:31:06.480
<v Speaker 1>this pandemic. I think at least for the next three

0:31:06.520 --> 0:31:08.160
<v Speaker 1>to five years, people are going to be more excited

0:31:08.200 --> 0:31:10.640
<v Speaker 1>to engage in real life than ever before. But if

0:31:10.640 --> 0:31:14.360
<v Speaker 1>we needed final confirmation that this metaverse thing is going mainstream,

0:31:14.400 --> 0:31:17.040
<v Speaker 1>it came this week from the Big Banks with JP

0:31:17.120 --> 0:31:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Morgan leading the way. The way that is into Onyx

0:31:19.840 --> 0:31:23.360
<v Speaker 1>that's its name for its metaverse lounge, complete of course,

0:31:23.400 --> 0:31:27.120
<v Speaker 1>with a JPEG image of CEO Jamie Diamond, and accompanied

0:31:27.120 --> 0:31:30.040
<v Speaker 1>by an eighteen page paper on why the metaverse is

0:31:30.080 --> 0:31:34.720
<v Speaker 1>a one trillion dollar Yes, I said, one trillion dollar opportunity. Now,

0:31:34.760 --> 0:31:37.360
<v Speaker 1>if you want to get into the JP Morgan Meta Lounge,

0:31:37.480 --> 0:31:39.400
<v Speaker 1>all you need to do is go to the Central

0:31:39.480 --> 0:31:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Lands Meta Juku Mall, put that in your GPS and

0:31:42.920 --> 0:31:45.720
<v Speaker 1>see what happens. That does it. For this episode of

0:31:45.720 --> 0:31:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street Week, I'm David Weston and this is Bloomberg.

0:31:48.720 --> 0:31:49.520
<v Speaker 1>See you next week.