WEBVTT - MLB: Leading Off Aug 18th, 2023 (Ep. 728)

0:00:05.760 --> 0:00:08.879
<v Speaker 1>What's up, Brindos, and welcome into Leading Off right here

0:00:08.920 --> 0:00:11.880
<v Speaker 1>on Fantasy Pros brought to you Bud Prize Picks. He's

0:00:11.920 --> 0:00:13.880
<v Speaker 1>prom a code of Leading Off get a one hundred

0:00:13.880 --> 0:00:16.439
<v Speaker 1>percent matchup to one hundred bucks when you download the

0:00:16.520 --> 0:00:19.680
<v Speaker 1>app and deposit today check out Prize Picks because we

0:00:19.840 --> 0:00:22.640
<v Speaker 1>are going to be laying out some prize picks here

0:00:22.680 --> 0:00:25.360
<v Speaker 1>in just a little bit. It is a fun Friday.

0:00:25.680 --> 0:00:28.040
<v Speaker 1>We are going to be taking your questions. If you

0:00:28.080 --> 0:00:30.720
<v Speaker 1>guys have got fantasy questions, drop them in the chat.

0:00:31.120 --> 0:00:34.600
<v Speaker 1>I've dedicated two spots into the episode where we're just

0:00:34.640 --> 0:00:37.360
<v Speaker 1>going to bring them up and rapid fire. So if

0:00:37.560 --> 0:00:39.400
<v Speaker 1>you are one of the awesome people that hangs out

0:00:39.400 --> 0:00:42.440
<v Speaker 1>with us live on YouTube, which we do in season

0:00:42.440 --> 0:00:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Monday through Friday, or in this back half of the

0:00:44.440 --> 0:00:47.720
<v Speaker 1>season Monday, Wednesday Friday, drop it in. We're answering your questions.

0:00:47.760 --> 0:00:49.600
<v Speaker 1>We got a whole bunch more a little bit of

0:00:49.600 --> 0:00:53.640
<v Speaker 1>where and where are Cormyn, Carol and I and the

0:00:53.840 --> 0:00:56.200
<v Speaker 1>rookie Lookie is going to have a whole lot there.

0:00:56.520 --> 0:00:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Casey Bubba in the house, what's up Bubba?

0:00:58.720 --> 0:01:00.480
<v Speaker 2>That much? My friend is a Friday?

0:01:00.520 --> 0:01:02.760
<v Speaker 3>Ready for the weekend, get some more baseball for us,

0:01:02.760 --> 0:01:04.600
<v Speaker 3>because yesterday was boring, six games boring.

0:01:05.240 --> 0:01:07.479
<v Speaker 1>It was boring, actually, and we were a little bit

0:01:07.600 --> 0:01:11.920
<v Speaker 1>light on news. But lookie, lookie, hello rookie. We have

0:01:12.040 --> 0:01:16.039
<v Speaker 1>hit the forty day marker everybody, and that forty day

0:01:16.040 --> 0:01:20.000
<v Speaker 1>marker or forty five day marker means that rookies can

0:01:20.080 --> 0:01:23.039
<v Speaker 1>now start coming up. We might get an influx of them. Well,

0:01:23.080 --> 0:01:26.200
<v Speaker 1>we got one of them earlier yesterday. But the breaking news,

0:01:26.640 --> 0:01:28.720
<v Speaker 1>like I don't even know when it was. I woke

0:01:28.800 --> 0:01:32.000
<v Speaker 1>up to it. It was a couple hours ago. Is twenty

0:01:32.120 --> 0:01:37.120
<v Speaker 1>twenty three first rounder Nolan Chanol is being called up

0:01:37.160 --> 0:01:40.640
<v Speaker 1>to the majors by the Los Angeles Angels, which is

0:01:41.000 --> 0:01:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Bonkerstown Bubba. I three weeks ago, three saturdays ago. I

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:48.680
<v Speaker 1>want to say, could have been a month. My time

0:01:48.840 --> 0:01:50.680
<v Speaker 1>is all kind of screwed up, but I want to

0:01:50.720 --> 0:01:54.960
<v Speaker 1>say it was three or four saturdays ago. Across the

0:01:55.000 --> 0:01:59.480
<v Speaker 1>street from me in Rookie Complex Flex League, I saw

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:01.520
<v Speaker 1>and talked to Nolin chan I was actually just watching

0:02:01.520 --> 0:02:03.280
<v Speaker 1>the video on my phone here a couple of minutes

0:02:03.280 --> 0:02:08.280
<v Speaker 1>ago about him playing the Kansas City Royals Complex team

0:02:08.720 --> 0:02:11.440
<v Speaker 1>he moved up to a ball. He went to double A.

0:02:11.600 --> 0:02:14.640
<v Speaker 1>He's passing triple A. In triple A. He ended up

0:02:14.639 --> 0:02:17.560
<v Speaker 1>having the most games played, had a homer, a stolen base,

0:02:17.840 --> 0:02:21.000
<v Speaker 1>three point thirty nine batting average, a better walk percentage

0:02:21.000 --> 0:02:25.280
<v Speaker 1>and strikeout percentage. Nolan Shanle is fascinating on so many ends.

0:02:25.360 --> 0:02:29.000
<v Speaker 1>One of the better contact hitters in college baseball this

0:02:29.040 --> 0:02:31.040
<v Speaker 1>past year. He was kind of presumed to be that.

0:02:31.200 --> 0:02:33.160
<v Speaker 1>I was a little slow on him early, moved him

0:02:33.160 --> 0:02:36.639
<v Speaker 1>back up power. It'll be questionable where that goes. He's

0:02:36.639 --> 0:02:39.920
<v Speaker 1>got a very high like his arms come way up.

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:42.640
<v Speaker 1>It makes you question how he's going to be able

0:02:42.639 --> 0:02:45.400
<v Speaker 1>to catch up to like high velocity pitches. But he

0:02:45.480 --> 0:02:48.800
<v Speaker 1>does set well and he makes tons of contact that

0:02:48.840 --> 0:02:51.080
<v Speaker 1>I think is going to kind of slap across the body.

0:02:51.720 --> 0:02:54.720
<v Speaker 1>It's a unique profile, it's a unique player, and it's

0:02:54.760 --> 0:02:58.160
<v Speaker 1>a unique situation, Bubba, where a twenty twenty three rookie

0:02:58.160 --> 0:03:00.720
<v Speaker 1>is making it to the majors for a off run

0:03:00.720 --> 0:03:03.280
<v Speaker 1>with the Angels. So is he a must pick up

0:03:03.360 --> 0:03:03.880
<v Speaker 1>in your mind?

0:03:04.400 --> 0:03:04.959
<v Speaker 2>It's wild.

0:03:05.160 --> 0:03:07.920
<v Speaker 3>Dude was drafted eleven weeks ago, he was lived in

0:03:07.960 --> 0:03:10.919
<v Speaker 3>college eleven weeks ago, and he's up in the bigs.

0:03:11.240 --> 0:03:13.160
<v Speaker 3>It's tough for me because I'm looking at the Angels roster.

0:03:13.720 --> 0:03:16.360
<v Speaker 3>It makes you wonder if CJ. Cron's back that messed

0:03:16.440 --> 0:03:18.359
<v Speaker 3>up because he's been dealing with this issue all year,

0:03:18.680 --> 0:03:20.639
<v Speaker 3>Like does Chanal come in and play first base? Is

0:03:20.680 --> 0:03:23.160
<v Speaker 3>that kind of the way things go there. He's not

0:03:23.160 --> 0:03:26.000
<v Speaker 3>gonna DH show. He's going to DH that's obvious. So

0:03:26.080 --> 0:03:27.720
<v Speaker 3>I think he's more of a deeply play for now

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:30.079
<v Speaker 3>just because and I'll say this, I'm gonna be I'm

0:03:30.080 --> 0:03:32.600
<v Speaker 3>always cautious with these ones coming up. There's a lot

0:03:32.600 --> 0:03:35.200
<v Speaker 3>of playing time questions and right now you're on the stretch, Frunt,

0:03:35.200 --> 0:03:36.960
<v Speaker 3>you need playing time, you need counting stats, you need

0:03:37.000 --> 0:03:40.040
<v Speaker 3>guys to actually be there doing it. So Chanal, the

0:03:40.040 --> 0:03:42.520
<v Speaker 3>tools are great, you're the prospect guy, I'm not. I

0:03:42.560 --> 0:03:45.280
<v Speaker 3>think he's a very intriguing play. Probably deeper formats for.

0:03:45.320 --> 0:03:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Me though, yeah, I think like in a standard redraft

0:03:48.600 --> 0:03:51.440
<v Speaker 1>twelve team, I don't know, because it I think.

0:03:51.320 --> 0:03:53.680
<v Speaker 2>The early word ringing corner infield at that it's.

0:03:53.520 --> 0:03:55.880
<v Speaker 1>A super fringy because listen, I don't think he's going

0:03:55.960 --> 0:03:57.680
<v Speaker 1>to be a big power option. It's not to say

0:03:57.680 --> 0:04:00.600
<v Speaker 1>that he might connect into one but I just don't

0:04:00.640 --> 0:04:02.640
<v Speaker 1>think that part of his game is there. And you

0:04:02.640 --> 0:04:05.080
<v Speaker 1>know I was telling you off air, like my god,

0:04:05.360 --> 0:04:08.440
<v Speaker 1>just make a joke about something. I had little snarkiness

0:04:08.480 --> 0:04:11.400
<v Speaker 1>come in my way about joking about the Angels developmental system.

0:04:11.440 --> 0:04:14.320
<v Speaker 1>But guess what, it stinks and it hasn't been good,

0:04:14.800 --> 0:04:17.400
<v Speaker 1>and it I mean from years and years ago, the

0:04:17.520 --> 0:04:21.440
<v Speaker 1>complex level stuff. I'm Eric Longahey for Fangrafts was just like, hey, listen,

0:04:21.520 --> 0:04:23.560
<v Speaker 1>you can't even pay attention to what the Angels do.

0:04:23.880 --> 0:04:25.839
<v Speaker 1>So I don't think it's ridiculous to say that the

0:04:25.880 --> 0:04:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Angel's developmental stuff in the minor leagues isn't great. So

0:04:31.200 --> 0:04:33.479
<v Speaker 1>it's unasurprise that they would draft players that are doing this.

0:04:33.600 --> 0:04:37.200
<v Speaker 1>But like, I don't think there has been time clearly

0:04:37.720 --> 0:04:40.479
<v Speaker 1>for him to like work through stuff that you would

0:04:40.560 --> 0:04:44.039
<v Speaker 1>work through. That's okay, by the way, But if you

0:04:44.080 --> 0:04:46.200
<v Speaker 1>want to take apples to apples of who he is,

0:04:46.520 --> 0:04:49.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he's a big I don't think he's

0:04:49.440 --> 0:04:50.760
<v Speaker 1>a big power hitter. I think he's gonna be a

0:04:50.760 --> 0:04:53.600
<v Speaker 1>contact guy, doesn't really run, going to hit lower in

0:04:53.640 --> 0:04:56.160
<v Speaker 1>the lineup. Like I said, when you see him, if

0:04:56.200 --> 0:04:58.920
<v Speaker 1>no one has seen him he's got a very it's

0:04:58.960 --> 0:05:01.200
<v Speaker 1>it's not council, his council like bring it back, but

0:05:01.240 --> 0:05:05.279
<v Speaker 1>it is hands up, a very open stance and it

0:05:05.400 --> 0:05:08.279
<v Speaker 1>all has to come together pretty good batspeed and he

0:05:08.320 --> 0:05:10.920
<v Speaker 1>makes great contact, but it's not a very lofty type

0:05:10.920 --> 0:05:13.400
<v Speaker 1>of swing. So if he's on something, sure he can

0:05:13.440 --> 0:05:15.120
<v Speaker 1>absolutely pull it. I just think this is going to

0:05:15.160 --> 0:05:17.360
<v Speaker 1>be a singles doubles guy. And where does that help

0:05:17.360 --> 0:05:22.240
<v Speaker 1>in fantasy? Especially for platooning with CJ. Krohn Dynasty love him.

0:05:22.360 --> 0:05:25.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm all in, Hey, there's a great guy to bet on.

0:05:25.120 --> 0:05:29.200
<v Speaker 1>First year player. Maybe this will be a fantastic move,

0:05:29.600 --> 0:05:33.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, going to the majors and getting major league

0:05:33.200 --> 0:05:36.839
<v Speaker 1>conditioning and development there because of whatever might be lacking

0:05:36.960 --> 0:05:38.880
<v Speaker 1>at other levels. Maybe this will be the thing that

0:05:39.000 --> 0:05:41.279
<v Speaker 1>unlocks the next step. But it hasn't been a great

0:05:41.279 --> 0:05:43.800
<v Speaker 1>track record. But I know that it is kind of

0:05:43.839 --> 0:05:46.440
<v Speaker 1>indifferent about now. But for fantasy purposes, unless you have

0:05:46.480 --> 0:05:50.839
<v Speaker 1>some keeper element to it, I'm probably not trying to

0:05:50.839 --> 0:05:52.480
<v Speaker 1>tell you guys to go jump to the wire.

0:05:52.720 --> 0:05:54.920
<v Speaker 2>I'd rather have his teammate Mustakas. Let's put it that way.

0:05:56.680 --> 0:05:59.760
<v Speaker 3>Really, go look at his numbers, don't you're looking at

0:05:59.760 --> 0:06:00.760
<v Speaker 3>the name, not the numbers.

0:06:00.800 --> 0:06:01.800
<v Speaker 2>He's been pretty darn good.

0:06:02.160 --> 0:06:04.839
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I guess. So now the prospect that I am

0:06:04.880 --> 0:06:08.159
<v Speaker 1>interested in as we rookie rookie hello or lookie, lookie

0:06:08.160 --> 0:06:12.120
<v Speaker 1>hello rookies is Mason Win. Mason Win is reportedly going

0:06:12.120 --> 0:06:15.440
<v Speaker 1>to be getting the call today finally, because again we've

0:06:15.480 --> 0:06:18.920
<v Speaker 1>reached that marker where these guys cannot have forty five

0:06:18.960 --> 0:06:22.360
<v Speaker 1>games in which presumably they can't hit one hundred and

0:06:22.360 --> 0:06:26.120
<v Speaker 1>thirty marker not going to have like the eligibility issues

0:06:26.160 --> 0:06:28.520
<v Speaker 1>of being on the roster too long. And this is

0:06:28.560 --> 0:06:30.760
<v Speaker 1>like the positive, so they could keep these guys as

0:06:30.839 --> 0:06:33.240
<v Speaker 1>rookies next year. That's another advantage to the Angels. By

0:06:33.279 --> 0:06:36.839
<v Speaker 1>the way, hat tip to them. Nolan Chanl goes plays,

0:06:37.520 --> 0:06:40.280
<v Speaker 1>gets tutelage, does whatever he does this year, plays all

0:06:40.320 --> 0:06:45.120
<v Speaker 1>next year, first baseman. That's right, he's the guy, and

0:06:45.160 --> 0:06:47.440
<v Speaker 1>they're going to put themselves in position to get an

0:06:47.480 --> 0:06:49.800
<v Speaker 1>extra pick the following year. This is what that team

0:06:49.800 --> 0:06:52.640
<v Speaker 1>should actually, I guess is a true Galaxy move.

0:06:52.720 --> 0:06:54.000
<v Speaker 3>You let the kid play with show Hey for a

0:06:54.040 --> 0:06:55.640
<v Speaker 3>couple months because he won't be able to do next year.

0:06:55.680 --> 0:06:58.320
<v Speaker 3>So it's a smart move. Get a little Carrot.

0:06:58.279 --> 0:07:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Well, because I was being starky on about that and

0:07:01.160 --> 0:07:03.279
<v Speaker 1>I was like, hey, Galaxy brain, when you have a

0:07:03.279 --> 0:07:06.080
<v Speaker 1>bad developmental system, just don't develop them and bring them up.

0:07:06.240 --> 0:07:09.440
<v Speaker 1>But like, this is good because you can get the

0:07:09.520 --> 0:07:11.080
<v Speaker 1>big stuff out of the way, because this is a

0:07:11.120 --> 0:07:14.640
<v Speaker 1>more mature hitter. And you know, I think everything and

0:07:14.760 --> 0:07:17.240
<v Speaker 1>how they approach him, this is a guy that produces.

0:07:17.320 --> 0:07:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Now underlying UH metrics and everything speak to him being

0:07:21.960 --> 0:07:24.880
<v Speaker 1>a player that is major league ish ready. But then

0:07:24.920 --> 0:07:27.640
<v Speaker 1>you're acquiring another pick if he does put himself into

0:07:27.680 --> 0:07:31.000
<v Speaker 1>that into that, you know, first getting Rookie of the

0:07:31.080 --> 0:07:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Year stuff like that's huge. I think that is huge

0:07:33.160 --> 0:07:35.520
<v Speaker 1>for him. But Mason Wynn is the one I'm more

0:07:35.560 --> 0:07:38.960
<v Speaker 1>excited about from a fantasy perspective this year. Don't know

0:07:38.960 --> 0:07:41.520
<v Speaker 1>if I would call it like must pick up, but

0:07:41.640 --> 0:07:45.960
<v Speaker 1>eighteen homer, seventeen stolen bases, sub seventeen percent k rate

0:07:46.000 --> 0:07:49.520
<v Speaker 1>this year in TRIPAA hitting two eighty eight. He's defensively

0:07:49.680 --> 0:07:52.520
<v Speaker 1>a monster. Can throw a hundred, He's not going to

0:07:52.560 --> 0:07:54.320
<v Speaker 1>come off. That's a great thing. Like this is a

0:07:54.360 --> 0:07:56.800
<v Speaker 1>player that defensively is going to push for playing time.

0:07:57.080 --> 0:07:59.720
<v Speaker 1>He's got a good power speed, Combo made some solid

0:07:59.800 --> 0:08:02.160
<v Speaker 1>change this year to make sure we're tapping back into

0:08:02.200 --> 0:08:04.480
<v Speaker 1>consistent contact. He hit two fifty eight at double A

0:08:04.600 --> 0:08:07.680
<v Speaker 1>last year. He ended up going to the AFL, which

0:08:07.720 --> 0:08:10.600
<v Speaker 1>was okay. He has been great this year. And this

0:08:10.640 --> 0:08:12.760
<v Speaker 1>is a guy that I think could have some sneaky stats.

0:08:12.760 --> 0:08:14.920
<v Speaker 1>So he is somebody that I am more interested in.

0:08:15.520 --> 0:08:16.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm with you on this one.

0:08:16.640 --> 0:08:19.520
<v Speaker 3>Definitely more intriguing power speed combo of the average you mentioned.

0:08:19.880 --> 0:08:21.520
<v Speaker 3>I think the defense is a great point that people

0:08:21.520 --> 0:08:23.800
<v Speaker 3>don't talk about because you look at these guys and

0:08:23.880 --> 0:08:26.200
<v Speaker 3>getting called up and you wonder, Okay, he's obviously gonna

0:08:26.200 --> 0:08:29.480
<v Speaker 3>play with modern that's simple. But like, how long is

0:08:29.520 --> 0:08:31.560
<v Speaker 3>Gorman out for with the back injury? It seems pretty bad.

0:08:31.680 --> 0:08:33.360
<v Speaker 3>Had to have a shot. That's going to be interesting.

0:08:34.160 --> 0:08:36.319
<v Speaker 3>Do they move ed into the outfield because there's moving

0:08:36.360 --> 0:08:38.520
<v Speaker 3>parts in Saint Louis, So if they can find every

0:08:38.600 --> 0:08:40.240
<v Speaker 3>day playing time for win, which I think they want

0:08:40.280 --> 0:08:42.880
<v Speaker 3>to And this was this was one hundred percent, oh

0:08:42.920 --> 0:08:45.760
<v Speaker 3>forty five days. Yeah, make the phone call, like because

0:08:45.760 --> 0:08:47.600
<v Speaker 3>he should have been up so long ago. There was

0:08:47.640 --> 0:08:51.560
<v Speaker 3>no reason. It was the Cardinals going nowhere. It's perfect timing. Obviously,

0:08:51.800 --> 0:08:53.440
<v Speaker 3>So I'm with you on this one. This one they

0:08:53.520 --> 0:08:55.880
<v Speaker 3>wanted him up, so he's expected to play every day,

0:08:56.040 --> 0:08:58.840
<v Speaker 3>whereas you know, Shannal and some others might be more like, hey,

0:08:58.880 --> 0:09:00.760
<v Speaker 3>let's get your feet wet, kidlet's see what you got.

0:09:00.880 --> 0:09:02.240
<v Speaker 2>When is going to play every day? They have no

0:09:02.280 --> 0:09:02.800
<v Speaker 2>reason not to.

0:09:03.200 --> 0:09:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and they got a lot of crap for the

0:09:05.200 --> 0:09:07.679
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Walker stuff. You know, they sent him down and

0:09:07.720 --> 0:09:11.280
<v Speaker 1>that was like clearly a piece of controllability. I think

0:09:11.280 --> 0:09:13.280
<v Speaker 1>it was in like Super two. I'm forgetting what it was.

0:09:13.360 --> 0:09:17.800
<v Speaker 1>But like, as I've said all year long, September is

0:09:17.920 --> 0:09:22.480
<v Speaker 1>the new roster manipulation for opening day roster stuff with prospects.

0:09:22.559 --> 0:09:24.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, it used to be, oh, this guy needs

0:09:24.559 --> 0:09:26.560
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more seasoning before he comes up to

0:09:26.600 --> 0:09:29.160
<v Speaker 1>the majors, blah blah blah. The new manipulation is waiting

0:09:29.400 --> 0:09:33.000
<v Speaker 1>just until it really is between like mid July and

0:09:33.040 --> 0:09:35.880
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of September the end of August here where

0:09:35.920 --> 0:09:37.760
<v Speaker 1>you can just have a guy come up enough where

0:09:37.760 --> 0:09:40.880
<v Speaker 1>you can control his ability to be a rookie next year.

0:09:41.120 --> 0:09:43.520
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, Mason Winn has deserved it. Nolan Gorman on

0:09:43.559 --> 0:09:46.120
<v Speaker 1>the IL has kind of stung for them. They do

0:09:46.200 --> 0:09:48.440
<v Speaker 1>have flexibility in general, but like, this is the guy.

0:09:48.520 --> 0:09:51.120
<v Speaker 1>This is the guy that's a shortstop. He's defensively probably

0:09:51.160 --> 0:09:53.120
<v Speaker 1>the best one of all of them right now anyways,

0:09:53.480 --> 0:09:55.920
<v Speaker 1>So he's going to be a great look. I would

0:09:55.920 --> 0:09:57.800
<v Speaker 1>definitely look at picking him up. Like I said, there's

0:09:57.840 --> 0:09:59.960
<v Speaker 1>a stolen base factor. He's still twenty eight last year,

0:10:00.640 --> 0:10:03.720
<v Speaker 1>ticked down this year only seventeen, but he scored a

0:10:03.800 --> 0:10:06.600
<v Speaker 1>ton of runs. He's hitting for more power. This is

0:10:06.640 --> 0:10:09.680
<v Speaker 1>a guy that I dig. A couple other news and notes,

0:10:09.679 --> 0:10:13.400
<v Speaker 1>but reminder I have I'm pinging some of the questions.

0:10:13.440 --> 0:10:14.959
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna answer a few of the questions here in

0:10:15.000 --> 0:10:17.480
<v Speaker 1>a little bit, and I will also give you the

0:10:17.679 --> 0:10:20.600
<v Speaker 1>hint today for where in the world Welsh and Corb

0:10:20.679 --> 0:10:24.280
<v Speaker 1>and Carol are, which really should be the batting cages.

0:10:24.360 --> 0:10:25.840
<v Speaker 1>And so I think we had a nice, good we

0:10:25.880 --> 0:10:29.120
<v Speaker 1>had a good, funny snark comment here which was where

0:10:29.160 --> 0:10:31.960
<v Speaker 1>are Welsh and Carol? I believe it was Le We'll

0:10:31.960 --> 0:10:33.960
<v Speaker 1>see if oh yeah, right here it was Lee. Where

0:10:34.000 --> 0:10:35.640
<v Speaker 1>are they there? Third place in the West?

0:10:36.080 --> 0:10:38.840
<v Speaker 2>And that is true. That's good, that's good.

0:10:39.160 --> 0:10:42.240
<v Speaker 1>It hurts so good, it hurts so good. My friend.

0:10:42.280 --> 0:10:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Other notes, as far as our headlines go, Holi Rodriguez

0:10:45.360 --> 0:10:48.920
<v Speaker 1>career high five hits including go ahead, three run homer,

0:10:49.559 --> 0:10:54.200
<v Speaker 1>five RBI. I believe this is his second consecutive four

0:10:54.320 --> 0:10:58.400
<v Speaker 1>hit performance. Plus you actually made the statement the other

0:10:58.480 --> 0:11:00.920
<v Speaker 1>day when I was pushing the Bobby Witt stuff. You said,

0:11:01.040 --> 0:11:03.920
<v Speaker 1>what about Julio? Could Julio jump back into it? I

0:11:04.040 --> 0:11:07.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of dismissed it in a like, Listen, I think

0:11:07.360 --> 0:11:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Bobby is in this spot. But if Julio's gonna Julio

0:11:11.559 --> 0:11:14.360
<v Speaker 1>out like this the rest of the season, at least,

0:11:14.360 --> 0:11:17.480
<v Speaker 1>what he's gonna do is he makes that whoever's not

0:11:17.679 --> 0:11:20.959
<v Speaker 1>top two conversation a lot more interesting, like Corbyn Carroll

0:11:21.120 --> 0:11:23.439
<v Speaker 1>is pushing himself out of it. If you're gonna hit

0:11:23.880 --> 0:11:26.600
<v Speaker 1>two thirty the rest of the season and you're gonna

0:11:26.600 --> 0:11:29.000
<v Speaker 1>dip down under two sixty or something, that's not gonna

0:11:29.000 --> 0:11:31.560
<v Speaker 1>work well. If he hits well and Julio hits well,

0:11:31.960 --> 0:11:35.360
<v Speaker 1>now I think you're looking at that three four five pick.

0:11:35.720 --> 0:11:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Maybe even having the fifth pick next year is gonna

0:11:37.480 --> 0:11:39.480
<v Speaker 1>be awesome because you will have the choice of Julio,

0:11:39.920 --> 0:11:44.199
<v Speaker 1>Corbin Carroll, Bobby Witt, Junior, Fernando Tatis junior, however you

0:11:44.280 --> 0:11:47.480
<v Speaker 1>want to go. But we are now twenty thirty for

0:11:47.679 --> 0:11:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Julio Rodriguez, first time having thirty stolen bases. He is

0:11:51.400 --> 0:11:53.640
<v Speaker 1>a monster. So any thought you want to throw to

0:11:53.720 --> 0:11:55.400
<v Speaker 1>the bounce back of Julio.

0:11:55.520 --> 0:11:56.080
<v Speaker 2>Just real quick.

0:11:56.160 --> 0:11:58.440
<v Speaker 3>I tweeted it out yesterday, I said, Julio's making everyone

0:11:58.480 --> 0:12:01.160
<v Speaker 3>forget about the slump some time for twenty twenty four

0:12:01.240 --> 0:12:01.959
<v Speaker 3>draft prepped like.

0:12:01.920 --> 0:12:02.960
<v Speaker 2>He's completely forgotten.

0:12:03.080 --> 0:12:05.760
<v Speaker 3>And since August first, dude's got twenty one RBIs and

0:12:05.800 --> 0:12:09.000
<v Speaker 3>six stolen bases. Twenty one RBIs. That's insane what he's

0:12:09.040 --> 0:12:09.600
<v Speaker 3>doing right now.

0:12:09.800 --> 0:12:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's absurd. So it's good to see. This is

0:12:11.960 --> 0:12:16.720
<v Speaker 1>a huge, huge thing for value planting for next season,

0:12:16.840 --> 0:12:20.280
<v Speaker 1>and you know, just for like us trying to understand, like, well,

0:12:20.320 --> 0:12:22.000
<v Speaker 1>what is going to be the you know, the true

0:12:22.040 --> 0:12:25.000
<v Speaker 1>maturation of this guy. Was it a complete fall apart?

0:12:25.080 --> 0:12:28.480
<v Speaker 1>It's not. It was a really I don't call it

0:12:28.559 --> 0:12:31.079
<v Speaker 1>really rough, but it was like, oh rough first half

0:12:31.120 --> 0:12:34.320
<v Speaker 1>of the year, two thirty nine in April, two fifty two,

0:12:34.480 --> 0:12:37.320
<v Speaker 1>in May, two twenty, in June, but then July hits

0:12:37.360 --> 0:12:40.960
<v Speaker 1>two ninety two, August he's hitting three seventy seven, he's

0:12:41.000 --> 0:12:44.120
<v Speaker 1>back at it. He's stealing bases and he's actually, this

0:12:44.160 --> 0:12:46.240
<v Speaker 1>is a fun fact. He has stolen six or more

0:12:46.280 --> 0:12:49.319
<v Speaker 1>bases every month but one so far. So I mean

0:12:49.679 --> 0:12:53.320
<v Speaker 1>that is just enabling extra good value and that's why

0:12:53.360 --> 0:12:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Julio is Huli when he does that thing. My friends. Also,

0:12:57.520 --> 0:13:00.800
<v Speaker 1>Tristan Cassis hit his twentieth home rund of this He

0:13:02.200 --> 0:13:05.160
<v Speaker 1>since the All Star Break is hitting three point thirty

0:13:05.320 --> 0:13:09.600
<v Speaker 1>seven with a three four seven slash, eleven homers, twenty

0:13:09.640 --> 0:13:14.240
<v Speaker 1>one RBI in thirty games, and Tristan Coassas is pushing himself.

0:13:14.240 --> 0:13:15.760
<v Speaker 1>I just want to say Bubba as a top one

0:13:15.840 --> 0:13:17.560
<v Speaker 1>hundred player for next year. He is going to be

0:13:17.640 --> 0:13:20.400
<v Speaker 1>I think maybe it's going to even be further. But

0:13:20.559 --> 0:13:25.280
<v Speaker 1>he's pushing himself into probably everybody's favorite buzzy sleeper first

0:13:25.280 --> 0:13:27.200
<v Speaker 1>baseman for next year to take that next step. So

0:13:27.240 --> 0:13:28.720
<v Speaker 1>how high do you think he's going to look for

0:13:28.760 --> 0:13:29.160
<v Speaker 1>next year?

0:13:29.880 --> 0:13:32.559
<v Speaker 3>Definitely top one hundred is going to be in the discussion.

0:13:34.080 --> 0:13:37.840
<v Speaker 3>Probably seventh first basement, six or seventh first basement because

0:13:37.840 --> 0:13:39.640
<v Speaker 3>it's it's a weird position where it kind of drops

0:13:39.679 --> 0:13:41.760
<v Speaker 3>off after the big boys early, like even this last year,

0:13:41.760 --> 0:13:44.199
<v Speaker 3>we saw a big gap in the ADP. I'd say

0:13:44.200 --> 0:13:46.920
<v Speaker 3>he's in that probably seventy five as range overall, and

0:13:47.040 --> 0:13:48.600
<v Speaker 3>I think there's a good there's a good argument for that.

0:13:48.720 --> 0:13:51.080
<v Speaker 3>Dude's got three homers this month in the last week,

0:13:51.320 --> 0:13:52.800
<v Speaker 3>the last two against but against lefties.

0:13:52.840 --> 0:13:54.160
<v Speaker 2>Say, can't use that argument anymore.

0:13:54.200 --> 0:13:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Like, I gotta go on for you next year. Cassis

0:13:57.720 --> 0:13:59.760
<v Speaker 1>or Pasquentino, that's.

0:13:59.679 --> 0:14:00.720
<v Speaker 2>A great comp I go Cass.

0:14:00.960 --> 0:14:03.520
<v Speaker 3>I've always I've always been skeptical of Pascalino and it's

0:14:03.559 --> 0:14:04.680
<v Speaker 3>nothing personal orything.

0:14:04.679 --> 0:14:06.360
<v Speaker 2>It's just I have yet to see it.

0:14:06.400 --> 0:14:09.120
<v Speaker 1>Basically, Kassas or Christian Walker.

0:14:09.480 --> 0:14:12.079
<v Speaker 3>That's a great one. That's a great one because Walker's

0:14:12.080 --> 0:14:14.880
<v Speaker 3>doing it again now. I'd probably still go Walker just

0:14:14.880 --> 0:14:17.840
<v Speaker 3>because he's shown the almost forty home run potential.

0:14:18.200 --> 0:14:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean Costas is moving into like.

0:14:20.720 --> 0:14:23.400
<v Speaker 3>A complete that's a great comp Like even like you

0:14:23.400 --> 0:14:24.960
<v Speaker 3>can ask that question this time next year and it

0:14:25.040 --> 0:14:25.800
<v Speaker 3>might even be closer.

0:14:26.080 --> 0:14:27.680
<v Speaker 1>There's gonna be something we talk a lot about in

0:14:27.720 --> 0:14:31.080
<v Speaker 1>the off season. But you know, he is league winny

0:14:31.320 --> 0:14:33.800
<v Speaker 1>ish through the rest of this year, very very trustable.

0:14:33.840 --> 0:14:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Start them all over the guys. The other big one,

0:14:35.680 --> 0:14:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Lance Lynn held the Brewers scoreless for seven innings and

0:14:39.200 --> 0:14:43.000
<v Speaker 1>a no decision on Thursday Bubba one four to four ERA.

0:14:43.520 --> 0:14:47.480
<v Speaker 1>Since joining the Dodgers, Lance Lynn went from cuttable asset

0:14:47.840 --> 0:14:50.880
<v Speaker 1>to someone you've got to start every single time. He's

0:14:50.880 --> 0:14:52.000
<v Speaker 1>out with the Dodgers right now.

0:14:52.520 --> 0:14:53.680
<v Speaker 2>Yep, love him or hate m my guy.

0:14:53.680 --> 0:14:56.000
<v Speaker 3>I neither Dodgers know how to utilize pitching outside of

0:14:56.040 --> 0:14:59.880
<v Speaker 3>a couple exceptions, and Land's getting the job done pitch exchange,

0:15:00.400 --> 0:15:02.960
<v Speaker 3>He's gonna be. The matchups have been friendly, I'll say

0:15:03.000 --> 0:15:04.720
<v Speaker 3>that much, but he's still been very good.

0:15:04.960 --> 0:15:07.800
<v Speaker 1>That's right, all right. So here is your hint I'm

0:15:07.800 --> 0:15:09.840
<v Speaker 1>going to give you for a little bit later. This

0:15:09.920 --> 0:15:12.240
<v Speaker 1>is the hint for where in the world are Welsh

0:15:12.280 --> 0:15:14.560
<v Speaker 1>and Corby and Carroll? And remember we're going to be

0:15:14.600 --> 0:15:17.360
<v Speaker 1>tracking and pick one person an autograph Corby and Carroll

0:15:18.200 --> 0:15:21.080
<v Speaker 1>card two if you can guess where we are from

0:15:21.120 --> 0:15:24.800
<v Speaker 1>the fun photoshopped of me and my bestie, which really

0:15:24.840 --> 0:15:27.840
<v Speaker 1>is making me feel like I am cursed that I

0:15:27.840 --> 0:15:30.960
<v Speaker 1>am cursing him with this. So maybe maybe it'll only

0:15:31.000 --> 0:15:33.280
<v Speaker 1>be at Chase Field every single game. It'll be at

0:15:33.320 --> 0:15:35.960
<v Speaker 1>the plate or a drive line or something. But the

0:15:36.080 --> 0:15:42.280
<v Speaker 1>hint today is Gustaf. It is Gustav that is the

0:15:42.360 --> 0:15:46.880
<v Speaker 1>hint and making it a much more difficult hint. Gustav

0:15:47.360 --> 0:15:50.920
<v Speaker 1>is the hint today for where Corbin and I are

0:15:51.400 --> 0:15:55.640
<v Speaker 1>listener questions, Uh, listener questions in the chat thrown out.

0:15:55.680 --> 0:15:57.360
<v Speaker 1>You guys can keep doing them. We're going to do

0:15:57.400 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 1>one more round of them right now. Are you holding

0:16:00.160 --> 0:16:02.680
<v Speaker 1>this is from whips? Are you holding Hazu's Lozardo bubba

0:16:03.280 --> 0:16:04.000
<v Speaker 1>rest of season?

0:16:04.360 --> 0:16:07.280
<v Speaker 3>It's only the deepest to formats like it's hard to

0:16:07.320 --> 0:16:08.040
<v Speaker 3>drop him, but you're not.

0:16:08.120 --> 0:16:09.640
<v Speaker 2>He's not an auto start. Let's say that much.

0:16:09.960 --> 0:16:12.320
<v Speaker 1>He's not an auto start. Last five have been rough.

0:16:13.120 --> 0:16:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Ronak also as should I drop Yuri for Lozardo in

0:16:16.000 --> 0:16:19.840
<v Speaker 1>a points league right now? My only problem with Yuri

0:16:20.040 --> 0:16:24.080
<v Speaker 1>is the capted innings. I don't like that. But Lozardo

0:16:24.120 --> 0:16:25.360
<v Speaker 1>has been really poop.

0:16:26.360 --> 0:16:28.960
<v Speaker 3>Like there's got to be a trade off between innings

0:16:28.960 --> 0:16:29.880
<v Speaker 3>and getting lit up.

0:16:30.320 --> 0:16:31.760
<v Speaker 1>It's just like if you're in a points and he

0:16:31.800 --> 0:16:34.440
<v Speaker 1>only goes four, like that win can be the differentiation

0:16:34.520 --> 0:16:36.440
<v Speaker 1>between anything, but Lozard is not getting any of that.

0:16:36.720 --> 0:16:38.240
<v Speaker 1>I guess it would go Yuri right now. It's just

0:16:38.280 --> 0:16:40.440
<v Speaker 1>a it's a rough patch. You should have a short

0:16:40.480 --> 0:16:43.280
<v Speaker 1>mindset with these guys. You know, someone made the joke

0:16:43.640 --> 0:16:45.240
<v Speaker 1>just the other day you weren't here for a Bubba,

0:16:45.280 --> 0:16:48.640
<v Speaker 1>but like every like fourth show, Joe would come on

0:16:48.680 --> 0:16:51.160
<v Speaker 1>and he'd be like, he's just Lozardo elite now, and

0:16:51.160 --> 0:16:53.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, no, he's not. He's just like really good.

0:16:53.560 --> 0:16:58.040
<v Speaker 1>And someone was like, where's Joe for Lozardo? Is he's getting? Yeah,

0:16:58.080 --> 0:17:02.000
<v Speaker 1>so it hasn't been good, all right, Royce or torkosen

0:17:02.080 --> 0:17:02.840
<v Speaker 1>rest of season?

0:17:03.120 --> 0:17:06.560
<v Speaker 3>I still go Royce. I think is the very talented guy.

0:17:06.600 --> 0:17:09.000
<v Speaker 3>I'm a huge torqu fan. I'm loving the development we're seeing.

0:17:09.040 --> 0:17:11.040
<v Speaker 3>He could be a fun conversation for next season, like

0:17:11.119 --> 0:17:13.720
<v Speaker 3>later on first Baseman. But give me Royce going forward.

0:17:13.880 --> 0:17:17.760
<v Speaker 1>All right, I'm gonna guess. I'm gonna go with and

0:17:17.920 --> 0:17:19.920
<v Speaker 1>guess I was thinking of the I was looking at

0:17:19.920 --> 0:17:22.720
<v Speaker 1>the thing for the the Corbin and Welsh thing. I'm

0:17:22.760 --> 0:17:25.439
<v Speaker 1>gonna go with Tork. We're gonna talk about Torq here

0:17:25.440 --> 0:17:27.040
<v Speaker 1>in just a little bit. I'm very much in on him.

0:17:27.080 --> 0:17:29.639
<v Speaker 1>Ce s or Galloff. We're both gonna say gal.

0:17:29.520 --> 0:17:32.800
<v Speaker 2>Off, Yeah, yeah.

0:17:31.760 --> 0:17:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, how about this? Sabo says Bubba Peterson Canfordo

0:17:36.080 --> 0:17:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Hanneger for late season power surge, you.

0:17:38.200 --> 0:17:41.840
<v Speaker 3>Take a new team by chance. I would say Peterson

0:17:41.880 --> 0:17:43.240
<v Speaker 3>is because he's got the most power in the group.

0:17:43.280 --> 0:17:44.960
<v Speaker 3>I don't trust any of them.

0:17:45.480 --> 0:17:46.200
<v Speaker 1>One, said Peter.

0:17:46.280 --> 0:17:46.879
<v Speaker 2>I said Peterson.

0:17:46.880 --> 0:17:48.600
<v Speaker 1>If I have to, yeah, I guess I would probably

0:17:48.600 --> 0:17:51.359
<v Speaker 1>go with the same thing. Let's see how high does

0:17:51.440 --> 0:17:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Riley Green go in drafts next year. I think it's

0:17:53.920 --> 0:17:55.880
<v Speaker 1>he's making the case seventy five.

0:17:56.240 --> 0:17:56.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's fair.

0:17:57.040 --> 0:17:58.879
<v Speaker 3>He's showing, he's showing it he's healthy and what he

0:17:58.920 --> 0:17:59.960
<v Speaker 3>can do and healthy. Yeah.

0:18:00.160 --> 0:18:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Top. Yeah, I haven't even worked on my life.

0:18:08.040 --> 0:18:09.840
<v Speaker 3>That's why it's tough, like gauge where it's at.

0:18:09.920 --> 0:18:12.200
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, it'll happen. It'll happen in the off season

0:18:12.240 --> 0:18:14.119
<v Speaker 1>between October and November. I'll be working on my next

0:18:14.160 --> 0:18:15.359
<v Speaker 1>season ranks, maybe even earlier.

0:18:15.440 --> 0:18:16.720
<v Speaker 2>But we do black book work.

0:18:17.200 --> 0:18:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, two other questions. I'm gonna say that's right black

0:18:19.680 --> 0:18:25.520
<v Speaker 1>book work because they are more Torqualsen related. And I

0:18:25.560 --> 0:18:27.600
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about him here in just a little bit,

0:18:28.000 --> 0:18:29.919
<v Speaker 1>So let's get back to the sheet here. If you

0:18:29.920 --> 0:18:32.680
<v Speaker 1>have any more questions, I'm going to try to pick

0:18:32.760 --> 0:18:35.679
<v Speaker 1>them and keep starring them. So you guys throw them

0:18:35.720 --> 0:18:38.120
<v Speaker 1>in the chat and we will we will answer them.

0:18:38.119 --> 0:18:40.680
<v Speaker 1>So and again the hint for Welsh and Corman Carroll

0:18:40.840 --> 0:18:43.720
<v Speaker 1>is Gustav So where are we? And I see some

0:18:43.760 --> 0:18:46.200
<v Speaker 1>good guesses in here, so we'll see what's uh, what's

0:18:46.240 --> 0:18:49.600
<v Speaker 1>going down. The other rookie lookies, by the way, is

0:18:49.720 --> 0:18:52.479
<v Speaker 1>lennyon Sosa is going to be called up today and

0:18:52.520 --> 0:18:56.080
<v Speaker 1>play with the White Sox against the Rockies. Because Tim Anderson,

0:18:56.160 --> 0:18:57.680
<v Speaker 1>and I don't know if you saw Tim Anderson had

0:18:57.680 --> 0:19:00.399
<v Speaker 1>like a little acapology. Very unlike Tim Anderson to be

0:19:01.240 --> 0:19:03.800
<v Speaker 1>contrite and apologetic, so I was kind of shocked at that.

0:19:03.880 --> 0:19:05.920
<v Speaker 3>I think I think he's realizing his shtick is out.

0:19:05.960 --> 0:19:08.320
<v Speaker 3>Because even the Austin Hedges on a Chris Rose show

0:19:08.880 --> 0:19:11.879
<v Speaker 3>said this was coming from somebody because he said basically

0:19:11.960 --> 0:19:13.160
<v Speaker 3>Tim talks too much.

0:19:13.880 --> 0:19:16.159
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well and not backing it up, you know, or

0:19:16.240 --> 0:19:17.840
<v Speaker 1>getting knocked out or anything like that. I mean he

0:19:17.880 --> 0:19:20.239
<v Speaker 1>also saw Lance Lynn did an interview with I think

0:19:20.240 --> 0:19:22.480
<v Speaker 1>it was Foul Territory and they were just He's like,

0:19:22.680 --> 0:19:25.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, here's my Yeah, he was like, here's my

0:19:25.359 --> 0:19:28.240
<v Speaker 1>statement on what was said from Kitny Middleton about the culture,

0:19:28.359 --> 0:19:30.520
<v Speaker 1>and then he just went silent. He or here's what

0:19:30.560 --> 0:19:32.080
<v Speaker 1>I disagree with I think is what he said, and

0:19:32.080 --> 0:19:34.159
<v Speaker 1>then he went completely silent about it. So you know,

0:19:34.400 --> 0:19:37.280
<v Speaker 1>the silence telling all the words. Lenyon, so's do you care?

0:19:37.359 --> 0:19:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Probably not an insane option, but he had did hit

0:19:40.200 --> 0:19:42.360
<v Speaker 1>you seventy one in the minors so far this year,

0:19:42.680 --> 0:19:47.560
<v Speaker 1>seventeen homers Strikeouts'll Mason win all day over him? If

0:19:47.600 --> 0:19:51.920
<v Speaker 1>that's something you're considering. Also, Mason Miller speaking, Mason's had

0:19:51.920 --> 0:19:54.119
<v Speaker 1>a couple of scoreless innings on Wednesday in a rehab

0:19:54.119 --> 0:19:58.000
<v Speaker 1>starting single A. A couple of strikeouts might be back.

0:19:58.119 --> 0:20:00.840
<v Speaker 1>I still say the innings could be wonking. Maybe they

0:20:00.880 --> 0:20:02.720
<v Speaker 1>put him in relieve, maybe it gets a start. Who knows,

0:20:02.840 --> 0:20:05.880
<v Speaker 1>but monitor him. He's starting to make his way back.

0:20:06.080 --> 0:20:08.959
<v Speaker 1>On the injury front, Marcus Stroman no timetable to return

0:20:09.320 --> 0:20:13.640
<v Speaker 1>return with a torn rib cartilage. No, that's no good.

0:20:13.800 --> 0:20:16.040
<v Speaker 2>I was from hip injury to torn rib cartilage no idea.

0:20:16.119 --> 0:20:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, very not good here. Brian wu is going to

0:20:20.000 --> 0:20:21.879
<v Speaker 1>be returning from the al on Tuesday, and it's going

0:20:21.960 --> 0:20:24.760
<v Speaker 1>to be a part of a new six man Mariner's rotation.

0:20:25.359 --> 0:20:28.640
<v Speaker 1>That's new, but probably not surprising if you think about

0:20:28.680 --> 0:20:31.560
<v Speaker 1>the rookies that they have put in there. It untaxes

0:20:32.359 --> 0:20:34.679
<v Speaker 1>some of the starters. We're gonna talk about Cerbie here

0:20:34.680 --> 0:20:36.720
<v Speaker 1>in a little bit, Kurby, you know these guys, like

0:20:36.880 --> 0:20:38.800
<v Speaker 1>it's a rough part of the season. I think I

0:20:39.119 --> 0:20:42.080
<v Speaker 1>talked about this on how a show was it? I

0:20:42.119 --> 0:20:44.520
<v Speaker 1>think it was CBS, if you guys. I was kind

0:20:44.520 --> 0:20:47.040
<v Speaker 1>of presenting the idea of like what is the wall?

0:20:47.240 --> 0:20:50.359
<v Speaker 1>And not Pink Floyd, but like what is the actual wall?

0:20:50.520 --> 0:20:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Is the wall innings or is the wall a time

0:20:53.680 --> 0:20:56.760
<v Speaker 1>of year? Is the wall the amount of time you're

0:20:56.800 --> 0:20:59.600
<v Speaker 1>in the major? Like I think the easy answer for

0:20:59.600 --> 0:21:01.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people is probably it's an innings number.

0:21:02.000 --> 0:21:04.560
<v Speaker 1>It's like, well, when you are twenty percent more than

0:21:04.600 --> 0:21:06.600
<v Speaker 1>what you've done in a previous time. But I wonder

0:21:06.600 --> 0:21:09.800
<v Speaker 1>if there's something bigger to hitting that wall, and I

0:21:09.840 --> 0:21:12.159
<v Speaker 1>think maybe the Mariners are getting in front of it

0:21:12.200 --> 0:21:12.640
<v Speaker 1>a little bit.

0:21:12.880 --> 0:21:14.560
<v Speaker 3>I think I guess that's why I wanted to put

0:21:14.600 --> 0:21:17.000
<v Speaker 3>on there the six man part, because all those young arms,

0:21:17.040 --> 0:21:18.919
<v Speaker 3>basically if you're in weekly leagues, two start weeks were

0:21:18.920 --> 0:21:20.080
<v Speaker 3>pretty much got out the window.

0:21:20.960 --> 0:21:22.800
<v Speaker 2>And and you're going to see more of this.

0:21:22.840 --> 0:21:24.399
<v Speaker 3>The Rangers have already hitting at it with the When

0:21:24.440 --> 0:21:26.680
<v Speaker 3>Heuvoldi comes back, I think about with these other teams

0:21:26.720 --> 0:21:28.840
<v Speaker 3>that have been calling up players, it will be happening.

0:21:29.240 --> 0:21:32.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, exactly. The other two just quick notes here,

0:21:32.400 --> 0:21:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Lars Noobar IL lower abdomen contusion, no point. I think

0:21:35.440 --> 0:21:38.159
<v Speaker 1>I'd already mentioned Nolan Gorman also on the IL. So

0:21:38.800 --> 0:21:40.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, Mason Wyn coming in a little bit of spark,

0:21:40.600 --> 0:21:43.840
<v Speaker 1>and Jady Martinez scratched from the Thursday lineup with growing

0:21:43.840 --> 0:21:46.359
<v Speaker 1>tightness and it's just kind of been like a rough

0:21:46.400 --> 0:21:49.040
<v Speaker 1>go as of recent with Jade Martinez. I put this

0:21:49.119 --> 0:21:52.800
<v Speaker 1>together for as I'm calling it pickup City. We'll say

0:21:53.200 --> 0:21:56.399
<v Speaker 1>using Fantasy Pros roster percentages. That does not mean that

0:21:56.520 --> 0:22:01.119
<v Speaker 1>is your roster percentages as we know CBS, I would

0:22:01.119 --> 0:22:03.280
<v Speaker 1>probably say is one of the more active. I think

0:22:03.320 --> 0:22:05.239
<v Speaker 1>that is a better number to go by. That's what

0:22:05.280 --> 0:22:07.800
<v Speaker 1>I tend to go by. Yahoos, I think is pretty good.

0:22:08.119 --> 0:22:12.359
<v Speaker 1>ESPN's is almost trash. So you'll see like guys that

0:22:12.520 --> 0:22:14.920
<v Speaker 1>are in none of your leagues are available and it'll

0:22:14.960 --> 0:22:17.239
<v Speaker 1>be like thirty percent on ESPN. Not trying to trash them,

0:22:17.240 --> 0:22:18.720
<v Speaker 1>but I think, you know, you get a lot more

0:22:18.760 --> 0:22:22.000
<v Speaker 1>like a casualness that goes into there and people give up.

0:22:22.240 --> 0:22:24.480
<v Speaker 1>So I'm only pointing this out because you might hear

0:22:24.520 --> 0:22:27.520
<v Speaker 1>me give percentages from this is an overall arching roster

0:22:27.560 --> 0:22:30.679
<v Speaker 1>percentage via Fantasy Pros that might not be representative of

0:22:30.720 --> 0:22:33.639
<v Speaker 1>your league. I picked five players that I think are

0:22:33.680 --> 0:22:37.320
<v Speaker 1>pickups that represent under fifty percent according to Fantasy Pros,

0:22:37.520 --> 0:22:39.359
<v Speaker 1>that you guys could take a look at. Bubba. I'm

0:22:39.400 --> 0:22:41.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna read off the five I picked, and you pick

0:22:41.720 --> 0:22:45.200
<v Speaker 1>your favorite one or two that's not get offf because

0:22:45.200 --> 0:22:47.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna say gellof so number one. I talked about

0:22:47.400 --> 0:22:51.040
<v Speaker 1>them on CBS. Spencer Torkosen twenty three percent ownership over

0:22:51.080 --> 0:22:53.680
<v Speaker 1>the last thirty days, hit nine homers, a two forty

0:22:53.680 --> 0:22:56.520
<v Speaker 1>batting average. I'm telling you, I'm very much into this

0:22:56.600 --> 0:23:00.399
<v Speaker 1>hype of Torkosen right now. Hard hit percentage over fifty percent,

0:23:00.680 --> 0:23:04.160
<v Speaker 1>barrel percentage highest of his career. A lot of things

0:23:04.200 --> 0:23:07.359
<v Speaker 1>are speaking to a breakout next season for him. Torkelsen.

0:23:07.680 --> 0:23:10.560
<v Speaker 1>For your homer play, Gellof thirty one percent eight homers,

0:23:10.600 --> 0:23:13.480
<v Speaker 1>five stolen bases probably been picked up in your league.

0:23:13.560 --> 0:23:17.200
<v Speaker 1>You also have Walner eight homers over the last thirty days,

0:23:17.280 --> 0:23:19.920
<v Speaker 1>only five percent on but a two to fourteen batting average,

0:23:20.240 --> 0:23:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Max Kepler thirteen percent ownership, seven homers with a three

0:23:24.880 --> 0:23:27.119
<v Speaker 1>hundred batting average over the last thirty days and hitting

0:23:27.160 --> 0:23:30.640
<v Speaker 1>three for that team, and TJ Friedel four homer, seven

0:23:30.640 --> 0:23:33.119
<v Speaker 1>stolen bases, a four to forty eight thirty day batting

0:23:33.119 --> 0:23:36.479
<v Speaker 1>average the most owned of this at forty percent. So

0:23:37.000 --> 0:23:38.439
<v Speaker 1>you know what I'll even say if you want to

0:23:38.600 --> 0:23:41.879
<v Speaker 1>rank them. As far as pickups, there definitely is a

0:23:42.000 --> 0:23:43.720
<v Speaker 1>like here's what I need for power and here's what

0:23:43.760 --> 0:23:45.280
<v Speaker 1>I need for speed. So if you want to pick

0:23:45.280 --> 0:23:47.440
<v Speaker 1>a power speed guy or you want to rank them,

0:23:47.440 --> 0:23:50.280
<v Speaker 1>whatever your choice, but who are you prioritizing on these pickups?

0:23:50.480 --> 0:23:50.760
<v Speaker 2>First?

0:23:50.800 --> 0:23:52.439
<v Speaker 3>I have to laugh because I write a fab article

0:23:52.480 --> 0:23:54.800
<v Speaker 3>for Fantasy Pros and then a waiver wire for GTE

0:23:55.200 --> 0:23:57.040
<v Speaker 3>and I use Yahoo, and I've written all these guys

0:23:57.080 --> 0:23:59.160
<v Speaker 3>up multiple times because i just laugh at their roster rates.

0:23:59.200 --> 0:24:01.119
<v Speaker 3>I'm just like, yeah, we do to hear people. But

0:24:01.760 --> 0:24:05.719
<v Speaker 3>for me, excluding Geloff, as we said, t J. Fidl's

0:24:05.760 --> 0:24:07.520
<v Speaker 3>number one. For me, I've rostered him all season long,

0:24:07.760 --> 0:24:13.240
<v Speaker 3>like he's very valuable in most formats. I go Friedel, Kepler,

0:24:13.720 --> 0:24:15.840
<v Speaker 3>then Torkle, sim that's like a two way two B

0:24:16.320 --> 0:24:18.399
<v Speaker 3>and then Waller fourth. I love Waller, but he's basically

0:24:18.480 --> 0:24:20.680
<v Speaker 3>Joey Galla light. He's gonna go on power surges. Yeah,

0:24:20.760 --> 0:24:22.840
<v Speaker 3>he's like Jackson wins Key think about it that way.

0:24:23.119 --> 0:24:26.760
<v Speaker 3>Similar similar aspects there. But yeah, I go Torque third,

0:24:26.800 --> 0:24:28.720
<v Speaker 3>but I won't stop anybody.

0:24:28.480 --> 0:24:30.879
<v Speaker 1>Where does ge out? Is gelof one in this for me?

0:24:30.960 --> 0:24:31.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:24:31.359 --> 0:24:34.040
<v Speaker 3>I think he's just legit as itids. I know he's

0:24:34.040 --> 0:24:36.240
<v Speaker 3>out producing metrics and all this. I don't care y

0:24:36.600 --> 0:24:37.280
<v Speaker 3>kids locked in.

0:24:37.680 --> 0:24:39.439
<v Speaker 1>I think like and also, if I were in like

0:24:39.480 --> 0:24:43.119
<v Speaker 1>a keeper format and I was looking for guys to stay,

0:24:43.200 --> 0:24:45.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, sometimes you guys have those like eight ten keepers.

0:24:45.800 --> 0:24:48.159
<v Speaker 1>Is there a guy in here that's keeper worthy? I

0:24:48.200 --> 0:24:50.800
<v Speaker 1>think Torkleson and Galoff are the only ones that are

0:24:50.920 --> 0:24:52.800
<v Speaker 1>close to that, by the way, I think the only

0:24:52.840 --> 0:24:53.640
<v Speaker 1>ones that are in that range.

0:24:53.960 --> 0:24:54.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:24:54.200 --> 0:24:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And I'm to selling you right now. I'm gonna

0:24:56.480 --> 0:24:58.840
<v Speaker 1>talk about torqu in the off season. I think everything

0:24:58.880 --> 0:25:01.520
<v Speaker 1>that you see under from him are the stuff you

0:25:01.640 --> 0:25:03.879
<v Speaker 1>look for for players to break out. May not happen.

0:25:03.960 --> 0:25:06.359
<v Speaker 1>Batting average still hasn't really been good to forty over

0:25:06.400 --> 0:25:08.439
<v Speaker 1>the last thirty but I think there's a lot working

0:25:08.440 --> 0:25:11.240
<v Speaker 1>in his favor. I think that is a sneaky building offense,

0:25:11.359 --> 0:25:13.080
<v Speaker 1>and I'm gonna probably talk about him. He'll probably be

0:25:13.119 --> 0:25:15.280
<v Speaker 1>a sleeper for next year. So that's just getting ahead

0:25:15.320 --> 0:25:17.440
<v Speaker 1>of the curve here, but Galloff in Toorkosen at the

0:25:17.480 --> 0:25:21.240
<v Speaker 1>top five. I also put together some weekend streamers for everybody.

0:25:21.520 --> 0:25:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Here are a couple of your options, Bubba, you give

0:25:23.720 --> 0:25:25.840
<v Speaker 1>me who you're down with on Saturday. I only found

0:25:25.880 --> 0:25:30.080
<v Speaker 1>two with low percentages, Chase Silset going up against Tampa

0:25:30.119 --> 0:25:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Bay and Chris Sanchez going up against Washington. Are you down?

0:25:35.359 --> 0:25:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Is this a thumbs up or thumb down for both

0:25:37.240 --> 0:25:38.919
<v Speaker 1>of those? If you're spots starting.

0:25:38.920 --> 0:25:41.640
<v Speaker 3>Still set one hundred percent, depending on what you need

0:25:41.640 --> 0:25:43.639
<v Speaker 3>in your format. I'm okay with Sanchez, He's more of

0:25:43.640 --> 0:25:47.200
<v Speaker 3>a wavy hand. Where still set them all for okay.

0:25:47.480 --> 0:25:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Sunday, we've got Dakota Hudson, who's fourn oh in the

0:25:50.880 --> 0:25:53.080
<v Speaker 1>here by the way, going up against the Mets. And

0:25:53.200 --> 0:25:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Kikeel going up against Pittsburgh.

0:25:55.880 --> 0:25:57.560
<v Speaker 3>No, I don't care who he pitches against. He could

0:25:57.560 --> 0:26:00.520
<v Speaker 3>be the California Pena League. We're not going all right,

0:26:00.600 --> 0:26:03.240
<v Speaker 3>So there's no chance, o k you stack against Kychle

0:26:03.240 --> 0:26:05.679
<v Speaker 3>every chance you can, people, all right, le chance. The

0:26:05.680 --> 0:26:07.560
<v Speaker 3>one guy that's not on the list, I'll mention Jesse

0:26:07.600 --> 0:26:10.560
<v Speaker 3>Schulten's pitches and Cooors on Saturday Rockies aren't the same

0:26:10.640 --> 0:26:11.560
<v Speaker 3>Rockies and Coorers anymore.

0:26:11.560 --> 0:26:12.720
<v Speaker 2>Shulton's been very good.

0:26:12.880 --> 0:26:14.399
<v Speaker 1>Okay, very good. By the way, we're going over a

0:26:14.440 --> 0:26:15.719
<v Speaker 1>little bit on the show, so I hope you all

0:26:15.760 --> 0:26:18.000
<v Speaker 1>love us, so give us a thumbs up on the

0:26:18.440 --> 0:26:21.080
<v Speaker 1>on the YouTube. Make sure you're subscribed show that love

0:26:21.640 --> 0:26:23.440
<v Speaker 1>and subscribe for all the videos into the off season,

0:26:23.440 --> 0:26:24.879
<v Speaker 1>because we're going to go a little bit over. Three Up,

0:26:24.880 --> 0:26:28.760
<v Speaker 1>three down South Freelick yesterday had three stolen bases, was

0:26:28.800 --> 0:26:31.520
<v Speaker 1>only one for three with three stolen bases. Corbyn Burns

0:26:31.640 --> 0:26:36.080
<v Speaker 1>nine strikeouts and seven innings and Enjoymnessa's five RBI. So

0:26:36.160 --> 0:26:37.480
<v Speaker 1>we already talked about Julio.

0:26:37.480 --> 0:26:37.919
<v Speaker 2>He would be the.

0:26:37.960 --> 0:26:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Number one on the down. There wasn't a lot because

0:26:40.080 --> 0:26:42.200
<v Speaker 1>there wasn't a lot of games, but Willia Domas was

0:26:42.200 --> 0:26:45.200
<v Speaker 1>still able to have four strikeouts and four bat's good

0:26:45.200 --> 0:26:48.879
<v Speaker 1>for him. Washington, Robert Garcia gave up six earned runs

0:26:48.880 --> 0:26:51.959
<v Speaker 1>and two thirds of an inning and I'm grasping its

0:26:51.960 --> 0:26:54.439
<v Speaker 1>straws here because there wasn't a whole lot of like

0:26:54.480 --> 0:26:58.400
<v Speaker 1>insane downs. But George Kirby he went six struck out

0:26:58.480 --> 0:27:02.000
<v Speaker 1>only two, gave up eight hits and four earned runs.

0:27:02.480 --> 0:27:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Maybe why we're taking a look at at that six

0:27:05.720 --> 0:27:07.879
<v Speaker 1>man rotation being kind of a positive bubba.

0:27:07.760 --> 0:27:09.840
<v Speaker 2>One hundred percent and it makes total sense with them.

0:27:09.920 --> 0:27:13.399
<v Speaker 1>That's right, Prize picks. Check out the promo code leading

0:27:13.480 --> 0:27:16.440
<v Speaker 1>off when you go download the app, use leading off

0:27:16.560 --> 0:27:19.080
<v Speaker 1>one hundred percent matchup to one hundred bucks. You guys

0:27:19.080 --> 0:27:22.240
<v Speaker 1>can play these, you can play multiple sports, you can intertwine.

0:27:22.280 --> 0:27:25.640
<v Speaker 1>The sports Price Picks has made fantasy Baseball and fantasy

0:27:25.680 --> 0:27:28.840
<v Speaker 1>and really sports in general fun and has made baseball

0:27:28.840 --> 0:27:31.280
<v Speaker 1>fund all year long. So get to playing with us

0:27:31.280 --> 0:27:34.400
<v Speaker 1>and use that promo code leading off. What you got

0:27:34.440 --> 0:27:35.159
<v Speaker 1>on the prize.

0:27:34.880 --> 0:27:37.520
<v Speaker 3>Picks, all the prize picks, We're just going to fantasy

0:27:37.520 --> 0:27:40.320
<v Speaker 3>scores over here. Give me Bryce Harper over seven and

0:27:40.320 --> 0:27:42.160
<v Speaker 3>a half. He is heating up in a big way.

0:27:42.720 --> 0:27:44.720
<v Speaker 3>That's a low number in the great matchup he has

0:27:44.960 --> 0:27:46.520
<v Speaker 3>Jay Rod. I'm gonna keep playing it because the dude

0:27:46.520 --> 0:27:48.760
<v Speaker 3>is just ridiculous. Over eight, it seems like easy money, and

0:27:48.760 --> 0:27:51.159
<v Speaker 3>then lou Bob incours over nine vers Lambert.

0:27:51.160 --> 0:27:52.160
<v Speaker 2>I love all three of those.

0:27:52.200 --> 0:27:54.879
<v Speaker 1>All right, I've got I actually gave four because of

0:27:54.920 --> 0:27:56.679
<v Speaker 1>the Luis Robert one. I actually really like that one

0:27:56.720 --> 0:27:59.520
<v Speaker 1>as well. That the score. I'm all scores here, Goldie

0:27:59.560 --> 0:28:02.639
<v Speaker 1>love the map seven and a half over Corey Seeger

0:28:02.880 --> 0:28:06.080
<v Speaker 1>at seven, Kyle Tucker at eight. Those are all fantasy scores.

0:28:06.119 --> 0:28:08.199
<v Speaker 1>I dig there was a couple. I will tell you

0:28:08.280 --> 0:28:12.199
<v Speaker 1>the strikeout combo of fought in Lugo was intriguing to me.

0:28:12.400 --> 0:28:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Nine and a half. Those are some pieces I might

0:28:14.560 --> 0:28:16.760
<v Speaker 1>put together if you guys are trying to price pick

0:28:16.800 --> 0:28:19.040
<v Speaker 1>it up. What about your best bets? If we're getting

0:28:19.080 --> 0:28:20.800
<v Speaker 1>into the betting market today, I actually made a bunch

0:28:20.800 --> 0:28:22.560
<v Speaker 1>of bets, locked them in last night, and I'm going

0:28:22.600 --> 0:28:23.639
<v Speaker 1>to tell you about him in a second.

0:28:23.680 --> 0:28:24.239
<v Speaker 2>But what do you got?

0:28:24.800 --> 0:28:26.280
<v Speaker 3>Stick with the Jay rod Wagon. I was looking for

0:28:26.320 --> 0:28:28.760
<v Speaker 3>some positive money. Hits runs and RBIs over two and

0:28:28.760 --> 0:28:31.720
<v Speaker 3>a half at plus one twenty five, Lou Bob Hits runs,

0:28:31.800 --> 0:28:33.879
<v Speaker 3>RBS over two and a half minus one ten, then

0:28:33.960 --> 0:28:35.720
<v Speaker 3>Royce Lewis over one and a half total basis, I

0:28:35.720 --> 0:28:38.680
<v Speaker 3>love the twins matchup today plus one twenty.

0:28:38.920 --> 0:28:40.520
<v Speaker 2>I like the plus the plus odds on those.

0:28:40.880 --> 0:28:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So I've got a couple parlay ones. They're kind

0:28:43.240 --> 0:28:46.920
<v Speaker 1>of odd ones. I found Bryce Miller's strikeouts. I don't

0:28:46.960 --> 0:28:49.600
<v Speaker 1>like that one today five and a half. I wanted

0:28:49.640 --> 0:28:51.960
<v Speaker 1>to play the under, but it was juiced. I tried

0:28:51.960 --> 0:28:53.920
<v Speaker 1>to find another strikeout one. Honestly, I just didn't like

0:28:53.960 --> 0:28:55.360
<v Speaker 1>any of the other strikeout ones. But I didn't feel

0:28:55.360 --> 0:28:57.200
<v Speaker 1>like there was an edge rough board. But I did

0:28:57.200 --> 0:28:59.920
<v Speaker 1>feel like there was an edge with Michael Lorenzen out

0:29:00.280 --> 0:29:05.840
<v Speaker 1>recorded outs. It is essentially big, juiced up stuff, but

0:29:05.960 --> 0:29:08.160
<v Speaker 1>it is canny get to the six, which he's done

0:29:08.240 --> 0:29:10.640
<v Speaker 1>in I believe four of his last five. Obviously he

0:29:10.680 --> 0:29:12.520
<v Speaker 1>went very long in the last one, but he had

0:29:12.520 --> 0:29:15.280
<v Speaker 1>a couple more days of rest getting into one hundred pitches.

0:29:15.520 --> 0:29:19.320
<v Speaker 1>So I took Michael Lorenzen outs over seven and a half,

0:29:19.480 --> 0:29:21.760
<v Speaker 1>which I am betting on him going six, and Bryce

0:29:21.800 --> 0:29:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Miller under five and a half strikeouts against the Astros.

0:29:24.480 --> 0:29:27.880
<v Speaker 1>That gave me plus one sixty four. That was one bet.

0:29:28.520 --> 0:29:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Did it? Hits parlay today? Corey Seeger, Shoheo Tani and

0:29:32.840 --> 0:29:35.960
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Tucker all just to get a singular hit that

0:29:36.120 --> 0:29:38.720
<v Speaker 1>was plus one fifty just one hit from all of them.

0:29:38.920 --> 0:29:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Pretty decent matchups across the board. And then I did

0:29:41.840 --> 0:29:44.880
<v Speaker 1>play Houston first five team total runs for them to

0:29:44.920 --> 0:29:47.040
<v Speaker 1>score two and a half on Bryce Miller. That was

0:29:47.160 --> 0:29:49.480
<v Speaker 1>almost even money. So I'm again, I'm just betting for

0:29:49.480 --> 0:29:51.760
<v Speaker 1>them to score three runs in the first five innings

0:29:51.960 --> 0:29:55.040
<v Speaker 1>on that offense. Bryce Miller's had a couple ones out there,

0:29:55.240 --> 0:29:57.080
<v Speaker 1>so that was my big bet. What about the dfs?

0:29:57.080 --> 0:30:00.120
<v Speaker 1>Somebody early on had asked, like right away, what some

0:30:00.200 --> 0:30:01.880
<v Speaker 1>of the big stacks are, So let's burn through some

0:30:01.960 --> 0:30:04.960
<v Speaker 1>dfs before we get to the final listener questions the

0:30:05.040 --> 0:30:08.000
<v Speaker 1>home run call and where were me and Corbin?

0:30:09.080 --> 0:30:11.280
<v Speaker 3>You know the top pitcher. Most will go to Spencer Strider,

0:30:11.360 --> 0:30:13.040
<v Speaker 3>but I'll save somebody. Give me Pablo Lopez at ten

0:30:13.080 --> 0:30:15.720
<v Speaker 3>point six K against the Hirates, tracking out twenty seven

0:30:15.720 --> 0:30:19.520
<v Speaker 3>percent of the time vers rietyes al Contra GPPs against

0:30:19.520 --> 0:30:20.520
<v Speaker 3>the Daughters of nine point six.

0:30:20.560 --> 0:30:21.480
<v Speaker 2>I guess a sneaky play.

0:30:21.720 --> 0:30:24.120
<v Speaker 3>Then, Brendan Fought has looked much better since getting recalled

0:30:24.240 --> 0:30:27.520
<v Speaker 3>padres Are and shambles six k for him stacks. I

0:30:27.560 --> 0:30:30.200
<v Speaker 3>love Philadelphia versus Don talked about that with Harper Love

0:30:30.240 --> 0:30:33.400
<v Speaker 3>Minnesota versus Jackson and the Pittsburgh Bullpen White Sox versus Lambert.

0:30:33.400 --> 0:30:35.480
<v Speaker 3>There's a million ways to go, but I'd start with

0:30:35.480 --> 0:30:37.880
<v Speaker 3>Philadelphia Minnesota. Talked about that on my show last night.

0:30:38.280 --> 0:30:40.120
<v Speaker 3>And if you're looking for some value, there's Matt Waller

0:30:40.160 --> 0:30:42.920
<v Speaker 3>two point four K versus Jackson. You got Gavin Sheets

0:30:42.960 --> 0:30:45.640
<v Speaker 3>and Coors at three K versus Lambert. It's a fun

0:30:45.680 --> 0:30:47.160
<v Speaker 3>slate if you want to be a little different and

0:30:47.240 --> 0:30:47.800
<v Speaker 3>avoid Coors.

0:30:47.800 --> 0:30:48.720
<v Speaker 2>There's plenty of ways to go.

0:30:49.240 --> 0:30:51.680
<v Speaker 1>I like it all right. Some listener questions we did

0:30:51.680 --> 0:30:53.520
<v Speaker 1>put out. I want to give you one last hint

0:30:53.560 --> 0:30:56.520
<v Speaker 1>here some good guesses, but you guys aren't finding it.

0:30:56.560 --> 0:30:58.640
<v Speaker 1>By the way, where in the world are Welsh and

0:30:58.680 --> 0:31:01.720
<v Speaker 1>Corby and Carrol. My hint you was Gustav and some

0:31:02.240 --> 0:31:04.600
<v Speaker 1>great ones. I'd have to scroll all the way back up,

0:31:04.640 --> 0:31:06.760
<v Speaker 1>but there was a you know, wind mill in there.

0:31:06.800 --> 0:31:08.520
<v Speaker 1>So that's the last hint. I'm gonna give you a

0:31:08.600 --> 0:31:11.400
<v Speaker 1>couple other questions as far as what you guys dropped,

0:31:11.800 --> 0:31:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Francis said Tyler O'Neill or Mason win rest of your

0:31:15.080 --> 0:31:16.080
<v Speaker 1>actually go with Mason.

0:31:17.000 --> 0:31:19.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I guess For me, it's O'Neill's because I know

0:31:19.320 --> 0:31:21.440
<v Speaker 3>I'm what I'm locked into or when's more of a.

0:31:21.440 --> 0:31:24.080
<v Speaker 2>Question work, and I'm just cautious. I've mentioned that many times.

0:31:24.120 --> 0:31:25.959
<v Speaker 1>You know what, though, as soon as I said that,

0:31:26.000 --> 0:31:28.200
<v Speaker 1>realizing like new bars on the il you got the

0:31:28.240 --> 0:31:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Carlson stuff, there really is playing time available. I think

0:31:30.960 --> 0:31:33.680
<v Speaker 1>I could go one of two ways win, maybe a

0:31:33.720 --> 0:31:35.840
<v Speaker 1>little bit more if I'm chasing more stolen bases than

0:31:35.880 --> 0:31:39.760
<v Speaker 1>Tyler O'Neill. But that's a really close one. And let's see,

0:31:39.960 --> 0:31:42.400
<v Speaker 1>this was one Richard said. A trade got vetoed in

0:31:42.440 --> 0:31:46.000
<v Speaker 1>my Dynasty League, Franco for Jimenez. The Amenez trader was

0:31:46.040 --> 0:31:50.320
<v Speaker 1>big time gambling. Do you think it should have gotten vetoed? No, No,

0:31:50.600 --> 0:31:51.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm I don't.

0:31:51.920 --> 0:31:54.040
<v Speaker 3>I'm not a fan of veto unless it's like so erroneous,

0:31:54.240 --> 0:31:57.520
<v Speaker 3>and honestly, with everything's going on, that's not that erroneous.

0:31:57.600 --> 0:32:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Unfortunately, Well and Bagman and I have always been the

0:32:01.320 --> 0:32:05.160
<v Speaker 1>likes of saying that vitos are a no go unless

0:32:05.200 --> 0:32:08.239
<v Speaker 1>there's collusion, unless you can prove that's not a collusion thing,

0:32:08.320 --> 0:32:11.720
<v Speaker 1>that's you know, trading a player that looks real. Dicey

0:32:11.840 --> 0:32:14.840
<v Speaker 1>not even talking about that news today, and someone's making

0:32:14.880 --> 0:32:17.200
<v Speaker 1>a bet. If they want to make that bet, that's

0:32:17.240 --> 0:32:20.040
<v Speaker 1>the most non veto e move you could possibly make.

0:32:20.520 --> 0:32:24.120
<v Speaker 1>It just might be stupid, you know. That's it's it's

0:32:24.160 --> 0:32:27.400
<v Speaker 1>stupidity and vetos and stuff sometimes do go together. Finnway

0:32:27.480 --> 0:32:31.520
<v Speaker 1>said dynasty Uri or schemes Yuri on that one.

0:32:31.720 --> 0:32:33.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'll leave that one to you if you know

0:32:33.080 --> 0:32:34.040
<v Speaker 2>those guys much better than my.

0:32:34.680 --> 0:32:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Am I playing Reagan's tonight in the standard five

0:32:37.800 --> 0:32:38.240
<v Speaker 1>by five?

0:32:39.080 --> 0:32:39.400
<v Speaker 2>I am?

0:32:39.480 --> 0:32:41.560
<v Speaker 3>And you better play him today because he plays in

0:32:41.600 --> 0:32:42.479
<v Speaker 3>the afternoon Wrigley.

0:32:42.720 --> 0:32:42.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:32:42.920 --> 0:32:43.720
<v Speaker 1>I was about to say I.

0:32:43.640 --> 0:32:45.440
<v Speaker 2>Think this was It starts at about an hour and

0:32:45.480 --> 0:32:46.080
<v Speaker 2>twenty minutes.

0:32:46.160 --> 0:32:48.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to say, no, I'm not.

0:32:48.040 --> 0:32:50.320
<v Speaker 3>You know, I'm a big Reagans fan, but I get it.

0:32:50.640 --> 0:32:51.520
<v Speaker 3>If you're nervous, I get it.

0:32:51.560 --> 0:32:55.480
<v Speaker 1>You can buy an nob no banks uh, Torque causes.

0:32:55.560 --> 0:32:57.480
<v Speaker 1>I will go Cassus, but I think Torque is going

0:32:57.560 --> 0:32:59.240
<v Speaker 1>to be in there least, so I think we're tor

0:32:59.280 --> 0:33:01.760
<v Speaker 1>in there. Yeah, and we'll try to do keep doing

0:33:01.760 --> 0:33:03.920
<v Speaker 1>more of these questions in I want to do these

0:33:04.000 --> 0:33:07.160
<v Speaker 1>more Wednesdays. But I didn't get it for the last

0:33:07.160 --> 0:33:09.280
<v Speaker 1>show because of the chaos, the chaos that was going on.

0:33:09.280 --> 0:33:10.800
<v Speaker 1>So I want to make sure getting your question. So

0:33:10.960 --> 0:33:12.320
<v Speaker 1>make sure you guys are hanging out with us in

0:33:12.360 --> 0:33:16.720
<v Speaker 1>the chat and we will throw to exactly all right,

0:33:17.600 --> 0:33:22.560
<v Speaker 1>let's get to it. The guess was Gustav last chance

0:33:22.600 --> 0:33:26.040
<v Speaker 1>to think. Here, Corby, Carroll and I best friends the

0:33:26.080 --> 0:33:29.520
<v Speaker 1>great photo shopped video. So let's hit the open and

0:33:29.600 --> 0:33:33.080
<v Speaker 1>let's get those last guesses. Where in the world are

0:33:33.320 --> 0:33:35.560
<v Speaker 1>well Corby and Carrol. But but you got a guess,

0:33:35.600 --> 0:33:35.960
<v Speaker 1>you gotta go.

0:33:36.040 --> 0:33:39.120
<v Speaker 2>I made a tough I'm thinking you're in Russia. I

0:33:39.120 --> 0:33:41.560
<v Speaker 2>don't know. I got nothing.

0:33:42.480 --> 0:33:43.320
<v Speaker 1>A little bit more German.

0:33:43.480 --> 0:33:45.719
<v Speaker 2>I've had, I've had. I've had some guesses lately, but

0:33:45.800 --> 0:33:47.160
<v Speaker 2>you got this one. I have no clue.

0:33:47.320 --> 0:33:49.200
<v Speaker 1>So I tried to make this really tough because I

0:33:49.320 --> 0:33:52.080
<v Speaker 1>the last one, I dropped Beryl and everyone was like

0:33:52.800 --> 0:33:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Niagra falls, Niger falls. Everybody got it. So a lot

0:33:54.840 --> 0:33:56.680
<v Speaker 1>of people were on the board. So I went a

0:33:56.680 --> 0:34:00.160
<v Speaker 1>deep cut with this one. I had to really go

0:34:00.240 --> 0:34:03.160
<v Speaker 1>deep because almost anything I could have said would have

0:34:03.280 --> 0:34:07.360
<v Speaker 1>probably full on gave it away. Nobody had it. Early on,

0:34:07.400 --> 0:34:10.960
<v Speaker 1>there were great guesses. Stockholm was in there. I should

0:34:10.960 --> 0:34:15.040
<v Speaker 1>have probably marked them up here. But there was like,

0:34:15.120 --> 0:34:20.520
<v Speaker 1>you know Germany, I think German Windmal cutlery shop, the

0:34:20.560 --> 0:34:22.799
<v Speaker 1>Brattenburg Gate. I don't even know what that is, but

0:34:23.640 --> 0:34:27.279
<v Speaker 1>somebody I'm gonna give the points to this because somebody

0:34:28.080 --> 0:34:30.440
<v Speaker 1>did kind of get this. They must they probably doing

0:34:30.520 --> 0:34:34.640
<v Speaker 1>some work here. And it was Sabo, because Sabo said Paris,

0:34:35.520 --> 0:34:37.640
<v Speaker 1>and we were in front of the Eiffel Tower.

0:34:37.440 --> 0:34:39.600
<v Speaker 2>Now an Eiffel tower. I saw, what does.

0:34:39.480 --> 0:34:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Gustav have to do well? The creator of the tower,

0:34:42.960 --> 0:34:48.719
<v Speaker 1>Gustaf Ifel Eiffel Eifel. Gustaf Eifel was the person that

0:34:48.920 --> 0:34:53.279
<v Speaker 1>built the tower in eighteen eighty nine. And by the way,

0:34:53.600 --> 0:34:56.399
<v Speaker 1>the tower actually opened up to the public for the

0:34:56.480 --> 0:34:58.799
<v Speaker 1>World's Fair. I guess it was the World's Fair in

0:34:58.880 --> 0:35:02.920
<v Speaker 1>eighteen eighty nine and it was Gustaf Eiffel that did it.

0:35:03.000 --> 0:35:05.040
<v Speaker 1>So me and Corbyn we were getting a little bit

0:35:05.040 --> 0:35:08.800
<v Speaker 1>of a not hitting We weren't getting hits, not getting wins,

0:35:09.080 --> 0:35:10.919
<v Speaker 1>but we did go and check out the Eiffel Tower.

0:35:10.920 --> 0:35:11.839
<v Speaker 1>Look how happy we look.

0:35:11.920 --> 0:35:12.080
<v Speaker 2>Yep.

0:35:12.160 --> 0:35:15.680
<v Speaker 3>Jacob Williams nailed that one. He had Eiffel Tower, Oh

0:35:15.680 --> 0:35:15.920
<v Speaker 3>did he?

0:35:16.280 --> 0:35:16.480
<v Speaker 2>Yep?

0:35:16.520 --> 0:35:18.799
<v Speaker 1>Where was that? Mark?

0:35:19.080 --> 0:35:19.200
<v Speaker 2>Oh?

0:35:19.920 --> 0:35:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so let's give credit Jacob Williams Sabo. I'm gonna

0:35:23.000 --> 0:35:25.600
<v Speaker 1>give credit to very Good. That was a weird one.

0:35:25.640 --> 0:35:28.160
<v Speaker 1>That was a hard one, but that is where we

0:35:28.160 --> 0:35:30.200
<v Speaker 1>were and we'll be tracking. I'm tracking all these I

0:35:30.239 --> 0:35:31.839
<v Speaker 1>hope you guys are having fun with it. I'm gonna

0:35:31.840 --> 0:35:33.400
<v Speaker 1>mess with the video a little bit this week and

0:35:33.920 --> 0:35:36.200
<v Speaker 1>let's finish this bad Boy out. We are going extra

0:35:36.360 --> 0:35:39.439
<v Speaker 1>overtime for you guys today on the home runs. Let's

0:35:39.440 --> 0:35:41.359
<v Speaker 1>take a look at the board if I can find it,

0:35:41.600 --> 0:35:44.040
<v Speaker 1>the home run board. Here, there you go. Blue Harvester

0:35:44.120 --> 0:35:46.840
<v Speaker 1>is still just killing their lead, but JJ tator e

0:35:47.000 --> 0:35:50.600
<v Speaker 1>is Kom and JJ Tatter coming Boy Raiser Ramon, m

0:35:50.680 --> 0:35:54.359
<v Speaker 1>Ia Hoffman jumped up and Wonky has jumped up with

0:35:54.440 --> 0:35:58.200
<v Speaker 1>me as well as MT Fisherrow. We represent five, six

0:35:58.280 --> 0:36:01.920
<v Speaker 1>and seven. At thirty six Walker, you're still eleven behind first.

0:36:02.200 --> 0:36:05.799
<v Speaker 1>Blue Harvester is absolutely holding on to that lead. For

0:36:05.800 --> 0:36:07.400
<v Speaker 1>the home run stuff, I'm having fun with it. I

0:36:07.440 --> 0:36:09.680
<v Speaker 1>hope you guys are as well this season. And if

0:36:09.719 --> 0:36:12.600
<v Speaker 1>you guys are a part of the premium accounts on

0:36:12.600 --> 0:36:14.399
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Pros, you can do this kind of cool fun

0:36:14.440 --> 0:36:17.200
<v Speaker 1>stuff that we do. And we're giving away this helmet

0:36:17.200 --> 0:36:19.960
<v Speaker 1>that you can see except its inscribed Fantasy Pro's Home

0:36:20.040 --> 0:36:23.239
<v Speaker 1>Run champ by Corbyn Carroll and I got it right here,

0:36:23.360 --> 0:36:25.279
<v Speaker 1>right here, to the left of me, all boxed up, baby.

0:36:25.360 --> 0:36:26.640
<v Speaker 1>So all right, what do you got for your home

0:36:26.680 --> 0:36:28.120
<v Speaker 1>run call today? Bobby, you've been on fire.

0:36:28.440 --> 0:36:30.080
<v Speaker 3>I liked yours. I'm gonna let you have it. So

0:36:30.120 --> 0:36:31.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm going with Bryce Harper. So I have a believer

0:36:31.840 --> 0:36:33.680
<v Speaker 3>in what we're seeing. He's getting healthy, he's swinging it well,

0:36:33.719 --> 0:36:36.160
<v Speaker 3>and is a phenomenal matchup versus on So Jimmy.

0:36:35.960 --> 0:36:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Harper, Well, this is our weekend call, so we're going

0:36:38.520 --> 0:36:41.279
<v Speaker 1>to get them through the weekend. And I've got Louise

0:36:41.320 --> 0:36:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Robert so Colorado, in Colorado. I think it's a pretty

0:36:44.200 --> 0:36:46.319
<v Speaker 1>good bet here, try to get a couple. Hopefully none

0:36:46.320 --> 0:36:47.839
<v Speaker 1>of these other guys in front of me took that.

0:36:47.880 --> 0:36:50.719
<v Speaker 1>So I'm going with Luis Robert for the rest of it.

0:36:51.360 --> 0:36:53.680
<v Speaker 1>There you guys go. So hopefully you guys are in

0:36:53.719 --> 0:36:55.719
<v Speaker 1>for a great weekend. Hopefully you guys are in good

0:36:55.719 --> 0:36:59.200
<v Speaker 1>position for your fantasy playoffs or your roto set up.

0:36:59.239 --> 0:37:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Hopefully we put you guys in a good position. Bubba

0:37:01.600 --> 0:37:04.760
<v Speaker 1>and I are back again next week Monday, Wednesday, Friday.

0:37:05.360 --> 0:37:09.040
<v Speaker 1>More Welsh and Corbin Carol. Hopefully he starts hitting more pickups,

0:37:09.200 --> 0:37:11.560
<v Speaker 1>more of you with your questions, So make sure we

0:37:11.640 --> 0:37:14.320
<v Speaker 1>do that and let's find ways to ras Joe Piezapia.

0:37:14.400 --> 0:37:15.319
<v Speaker 1>That's the most important thing.

0:37:15.360 --> 0:37:16.640
<v Speaker 2>Always, That's always.

0:37:16.719 --> 0:37:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Somebody goes on his butt by the way about

0:37:19.200 --> 0:37:21.440
<v Speaker 1>to ask him a baseball question and he's like, I'm

0:37:21.480 --> 0:37:24.840
<v Speaker 1>into football, and they're like, come on, buddy, what's your problem?

0:37:24.880 --> 0:37:26.799
<v Speaker 1>What's your problem? So let's make sure Joonah.

0:37:26.560 --> 0:37:27.880
<v Speaker 2>Give it to him.

0:37:28.239 --> 0:37:30.360
<v Speaker 1>That's right. You guys can find us on Twitter. Is

0:37:30.360 --> 0:37:33.080
<v Speaker 1>that the Welsh Bogman sports? I was gonna do at

0:37:34.000 --> 0:37:37.800
<v Speaker 1>other guy be the en trick and is it the Welsh?

0:37:38.040 --> 0:37:39.919
<v Speaker 1>It's Bubba and Welsh right here and leading off. Thanks

0:37:39.920 --> 0:37:41.279
<v Speaker 1>for hanging out with us, guys. We'll talk to you

0:37:41.320 --> 0:37:44.040
<v Speaker 1>next week. Right on Fantasy Bros. My friend does be