WEBVTT - Nvidia Sales Forecast Delivers on AI Hopes

0:00:02.920 --> 0:00:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news.

0:00:08.520 --> 0:00:12.880
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Business Wait inside from the reporters and

0:00:13.080 --> 0:00:16.640
<v Speaker 2>editors who bring you America's most trusted business magazine, plus

0:00:16.720 --> 0:00:20.599
<v Speaker 2>gloom War, Business finance, and tech news. The Bloomberg Business

0:00:20.600 --> 0:00:29.600
<v Speaker 2>Week Podcast with Carol Messer and Tim Stenebeck. From Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:27.640 --> 0:00:29.680
<v Speaker 1>And Video's impact on the epity trade today to the

0:00:29.680 --> 0:00:32.199
<v Speaker 1>details behind and Video's earnings and outlook. That's where we

0:00:32.240 --> 0:00:35.000
<v Speaker 1>want to go. As we noted, the superlatives continue the

0:00:35.280 --> 0:00:38.000
<v Speaker 1>maker at the center of the artificial intelligence boom and

0:00:38.080 --> 0:00:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Video shares topping one thousand dollars for the first time.

0:00:41.159 --> 0:00:44.559
<v Speaker 1>We talked about the market cap a blowout quarter, So

0:00:44.680 --> 0:00:46.680
<v Speaker 1>let's get to it. Back with us is Bloomberg News

0:00:46.760 --> 0:00:49.640
<v Speaker 1>US Semiconductor and Networking reporter Ian King. He's in our

0:00:49.680 --> 0:00:53.680
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco bureau. Ian, you know the superlatives. We're watching

0:00:53.680 --> 0:00:56.120
<v Speaker 1>the stock up above one thousand dollars for the first time,

0:00:56.320 --> 0:01:00.000
<v Speaker 1>soaring in today's session. Walk us through all the number

0:01:00.440 --> 0:01:03.240
<v Speaker 1>that showed Nvidia continues to deliver in your view.

0:01:04.280 --> 0:01:07.319
<v Speaker 3>I mean, obviously, the first place to start is with

0:01:07.480 --> 0:01:11.679
<v Speaker 3>the revenue guidance analysts were looking for doubling year of

0:01:11.680 --> 0:01:14.679
<v Speaker 3>a year in this current quarter. In Video said, yeah,

0:01:14.680 --> 0:01:16.240
<v Speaker 3>we can do that, and we can do a bit more.

0:01:16.760 --> 0:01:20.240
<v Speaker 3>So even though there were lofty expectations, they managed to

0:01:20.400 --> 0:01:26.280
<v Speaker 3>set expectations even higher. The data center business is already

0:01:26.319 --> 0:01:31.720
<v Speaker 3>bigger than Intel an AMD, and it's getting bigger quicker

0:01:31.760 --> 0:01:35.039
<v Speaker 3>than people had projected more than four hundred percent a

0:01:35.160 --> 0:01:37.880
<v Speaker 3>year on year increase in that particular business. So all

0:01:37.920 --> 0:01:42.280
<v Speaker 3>of the fundamental numbers that in Vidia need to show

0:01:42.480 --> 0:01:44.720
<v Speaker 3>we're heading in the right direction, it was able to

0:01:44.760 --> 0:01:45.240
<v Speaker 3>deliver on.

0:01:45.720 --> 0:01:48.520
<v Speaker 4>It's pretty again, incredible to see the stock reaction today.

0:01:48.600 --> 0:01:51.120
<v Speaker 4>Shares hired by more than ten percent as we speak

0:01:51.200 --> 0:01:54.200
<v Speaker 4>right now. Ian was I was a little struck, and

0:01:54.240 --> 0:01:56.120
<v Speaker 4>Carol mentioned this by a couple of the things that

0:01:56.160 --> 0:01:59.080
<v Speaker 4>they also announced the ten to one stock split coming

0:01:59.160 --> 0:02:01.720
<v Speaker 4>next month, and then increasing the dividend. Curious if you

0:02:01.720 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 4>have any thoughts on either of those things.

0:02:03.560 --> 0:02:06.160
<v Speaker 3>Well, I mean, you know, as you were just discussing

0:02:06.200 --> 0:02:08.760
<v Speaker 3>with Bailey, I believe that the stock split is something

0:02:08.800 --> 0:02:11.960
<v Speaker 3>that's aimed at retail investors, but it's also aimed at

0:02:12.280 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 3>their internal audience as well. A certain percentage of the

0:02:16.480 --> 0:02:19.600
<v Speaker 3>shares get bought by individuals. You know, they get like

0:02:19.639 --> 0:02:23.760
<v Speaker 3>a discount slash, you know, allowance that they can buy

0:02:23.800 --> 0:02:25.840
<v Speaker 3>at a certain point. So you know they want to

0:02:26.000 --> 0:02:28.600
<v Speaker 3>want to keep their employees happily. Right, you need those engineers,

0:02:28.639 --> 0:02:31.960
<v Speaker 3>you need those that staff. That's that's you know, so

0:02:32.080 --> 0:02:34.359
<v Speaker 3>invested in what you're doing. So that might be part

0:02:34.400 --> 0:02:34.919
<v Speaker 3>of it as well.

0:02:35.040 --> 0:02:36.639
<v Speaker 1>Can I ask you though, because I did scratch my

0:02:36.680 --> 0:02:37.680
<v Speaker 1>head a little bit about it.

0:02:37.680 --> 0:02:37.959
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:02:38.000 --> 0:02:39.920
<v Speaker 1>I was going back and forth with a brother of

0:02:39.960 --> 0:02:42.120
<v Speaker 1>mine who has been in an Nvidia for years, and

0:02:42.160 --> 0:02:42.960
<v Speaker 1>we're going back and.

0:02:43.080 --> 0:02:44.359
<v Speaker 4>Got to get it your brother on.

0:02:44.320 --> 0:02:45.280
<v Speaker 2>The show, I don't know that.

0:02:45.360 --> 0:02:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he's pretty smart, just really well read. But about

0:02:49.000 --> 0:02:51.480
<v Speaker 1>the dividend, because I always feel like companies do that

0:02:52.080 --> 0:02:54.000
<v Speaker 1>when maybe growth is slowing or something to kind of

0:02:54.040 --> 0:02:56.920
<v Speaker 1>keep investors happy. Is there something, though, connected with that

0:02:57.000 --> 0:02:59.560
<v Speaker 1>stock split that they raise the dividends so much?

0:03:00.520 --> 0:03:03.480
<v Speaker 3>I mean, for some in conductor companies which are massively

0:03:03.520 --> 0:03:07.680
<v Speaker 3>capital intensive, even when they don't own their own manufacturing,

0:03:07.720 --> 0:03:10.720
<v Speaker 3>that the question is how much are they spending as

0:03:10.720 --> 0:03:15.359
<v Speaker 3>a percentage of their revenue on R and D, on design,

0:03:15.600 --> 0:03:17.840
<v Speaker 3>on making sure that the next product's coming along? And

0:03:18.160 --> 0:03:21.080
<v Speaker 3>you look, you know, Nvidia is one of the highest,

0:03:21.080 --> 0:03:24.160
<v Speaker 3>one of the biggest spenders by any measure in the

0:03:24.240 --> 0:03:26.200
<v Speaker 3>chip industry. So as long as they're doing that, I

0:03:26.200 --> 0:03:29.280
<v Speaker 3>would say that most in Vidia watchers don't care. It's

0:03:29.400 --> 0:03:31.680
<v Speaker 3>just something nice to have. On the other side of.

0:03:31.639 --> 0:03:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Things, well, you talk about the R and D spend

0:03:34.840 --> 0:03:37.080
<v Speaker 1>and it really, you know, certainly seems to be paying

0:03:37.080 --> 0:03:39.280
<v Speaker 1>off for Nvidia. Having said that, talk to us about

0:03:39.320 --> 0:03:41.120
<v Speaker 1>the development cycle, and I bring it up because I

0:03:41.160 --> 0:03:44.840
<v Speaker 1>was listening to Bloomberg Intelligence man Deep Seeing earlier. I

0:03:44.880 --> 0:03:47.840
<v Speaker 1>think it was on surveillance this morning about how for

0:03:48.000 --> 0:03:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Nvidia it's kind of a shorter time like almost every year,

0:03:51.480 --> 0:03:54.280
<v Speaker 1>and that that is going to require companies who want

0:03:54.320 --> 0:03:56.920
<v Speaker 1>to have the latest and greatest from Nvidia and in

0:03:56.960 --> 0:03:59.400
<v Speaker 1>the AI chip world, that they're going to be adjusting

0:03:59.440 --> 0:04:03.200
<v Speaker 1>their CAPEX been to include that every year. So maybe

0:04:03.320 --> 0:04:07.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, different from Moore's law, right that you know,

0:04:07.400 --> 0:04:10.280
<v Speaker 1>the increase in terms of components on a circuit and

0:04:10.360 --> 0:04:14.840
<v Speaker 1>processing ability doubling every year for ten years. So maybe

0:04:15.040 --> 0:04:17.279
<v Speaker 1>something's different. I don't know. Is it is it shorter,

0:04:17.440 --> 0:04:21.960
<v Speaker 1>is it a much more kind of you know, new

0:04:22.720 --> 0:04:26.920
<v Speaker 1>development cycle for Nvidia that's going to keep these numbers growing. Sorry,

0:04:26.960 --> 0:04:29.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm not being very eloquent because you're smarter less than

0:04:29.000 --> 0:04:29.280
<v Speaker 1>I am.

0:04:29.720 --> 0:04:32.559
<v Speaker 3>Not at all. No, you're going to a good point

0:04:32.600 --> 0:04:35.640
<v Speaker 3>here and within It has numerous aspects to it. Basically,

0:04:35.680 --> 0:04:38.160
<v Speaker 3>what Jensen Lang, the CEO said, he said, Look, we

0:04:38.160 --> 0:04:41.880
<v Speaker 3>were bringing new product market for this market roughly sort

0:04:41.880 --> 0:04:45.080
<v Speaker 3>of every eighteen months or so. Now we're going to

0:04:45.080 --> 0:04:46.840
<v Speaker 3>do it every year. We're going to do it every

0:04:46.880 --> 0:04:50.000
<v Speaker 3>year for a number of reasons. He you know, put

0:04:50.080 --> 0:04:53.200
<v Speaker 3>that the salesman routine. Look, we're helping our customers. This

0:04:53.360 --> 0:04:56.799
<v Speaker 3>market is changing rapidly, so we need to bring soft

0:04:56.839 --> 0:04:59.159
<v Speaker 3>and market much much quicker than we were doing. To

0:04:59.200 --> 0:05:02.480
<v Speaker 3>help support is to help bring these new capabilities. Everybody

0:05:02.600 --> 0:05:06.640
<v Speaker 3>wins everything, you know, the pace of innovation increases. Flip

0:05:06.680 --> 0:05:08.800
<v Speaker 3>side of that is, you remember earlier this year we

0:05:08.800 --> 0:05:13.120
<v Speaker 3>were talking about what AMD's doing, what Intel's doing. You know,

0:05:13.160 --> 0:05:14.799
<v Speaker 3>how are they going to get into the market. And

0:05:14.960 --> 0:05:17.400
<v Speaker 3>what Jensen Wang has basically said to them is like

0:05:17.680 --> 0:05:19.919
<v Speaker 3>that moving train that you are trying to catch is

0:05:19.960 --> 0:05:20.960
<v Speaker 3>going even faster.

0:05:21.080 --> 0:05:21.279
<v Speaker 2>Good.

0:05:21.279 --> 0:05:25.000
<v Speaker 3>Look, So that's what's really going on on a competitive

0:05:25.040 --> 0:05:25.960
<v Speaker 3>basis there as well.

0:05:26.000 --> 0:05:27.839
<v Speaker 1>And more's law I meant doubling every two years, So

0:05:27.880 --> 0:05:30.000
<v Speaker 1>forgive me, yeah, so much faster here.

0:05:29.839 --> 0:05:31.400
<v Speaker 4>You know, Ian, I want to to that end of

0:05:31.440 --> 0:05:33.320
<v Speaker 4>this of jumping on that train, I want to talk

0:05:33.320 --> 0:05:35.680
<v Speaker 4>a little bit about margins, because the company said that

0:05:35.839 --> 0:05:39.560
<v Speaker 4>margins for the gross margins will be seventy five point

0:05:39.640 --> 0:05:45.080
<v Speaker 4>seven five percent in the current quarter. As you noted,

0:05:45.120 --> 0:05:47.279
<v Speaker 4>this is more like a software company rather than a

0:05:47.360 --> 0:05:49.719
<v Speaker 4>chip company. And you yesterday talked about Intel being in

0:05:49.720 --> 0:05:52.920
<v Speaker 4>the low sixties at its height, when it really owned

0:05:52.960 --> 0:05:55.840
<v Speaker 4>the server market. What can history tell us about the

0:05:55.960 --> 0:05:59.599
<v Speaker 4>duration and durability of margins like this for a chip company.

0:06:00.320 --> 0:06:03.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean right now, their margins are what they

0:06:03.240 --> 0:06:06.599
<v Speaker 3>want them to be because it's just really a case of, well,

0:06:07.480 --> 0:06:10.279
<v Speaker 3>our prices a sky high, were sold out. We can

0:06:10.560 --> 0:06:13.400
<v Speaker 3>essentially charge what we want, so obviously the pricing is

0:06:13.480 --> 0:06:15.680
<v Speaker 3>very good for margins. On the flip side of that,

0:06:15.760 --> 0:06:18.280
<v Speaker 3>as we just discussed, they can spend what they want.

0:06:18.360 --> 0:06:20.000
<v Speaker 3>It's you know, how much do we want to spend

0:06:20.000 --> 0:06:22.520
<v Speaker 3>on R and D, how well do we want to

0:06:22.600 --> 0:06:26.760
<v Speaker 3>reward our employees. So the margins are sky high, but

0:06:27.000 --> 0:06:30.600
<v Speaker 3>they could make them artificially higher. The fact that they're

0:06:30.640 --> 0:06:33.840
<v Speaker 3>spending heavily. The fact that they're able to charge a lot,

0:06:33.960 --> 0:06:37.880
<v Speaker 3>that's something that's going to probably persist. So they're setting

0:06:37.960 --> 0:06:40.440
<v Speaker 3>very high targets, but they could be even higher, So

0:06:40.800 --> 0:06:44.040
<v Speaker 3>you know, as a measure of their health, it's pretty good.

0:06:44.440 --> 0:06:47.560
<v Speaker 4>Do you agree with Jensen's comment that the freight train

0:06:47.640 --> 0:06:50.039
<v Speaker 4>is now moving faster and these companies will have a

0:06:50.080 --> 0:06:52.680
<v Speaker 4>more difficult time, the AMDs and the like will have

0:06:52.680 --> 0:06:54.520
<v Speaker 4>a more difficult time catching up with Nvidia.

0:06:55.320 --> 0:06:58.880
<v Speaker 3>I mean Jensen's racing. I mean that one of the

0:06:58.920 --> 0:07:02.120
<v Speaker 3>things that comes across in pretty much any time he

0:07:02.279 --> 0:07:06.960
<v Speaker 3>says something, he's constantly aware of the tension that exists

0:07:06.960 --> 0:07:10.160
<v Speaker 3>in his business and his market, and he's consciously trying

0:07:10.240 --> 0:07:14.000
<v Speaker 3>to shape post what his company does and his understanding

0:07:14.080 --> 0:07:17.040
<v Speaker 3>of the relationships, where we are in the cycle, where

0:07:17.040 --> 0:07:19.760
<v Speaker 3>we are relative to the competition, what the customers want.

0:07:19.800 --> 0:07:22.480
<v Speaker 3>He's trying to shape his narrative to fit that. He's

0:07:23.160 --> 0:07:26.040
<v Speaker 3>very clever, and he's showing people that he understands what's

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:29.000
<v Speaker 3>going on and what he has to do to stay ahead,

0:07:29.000 --> 0:07:32.600
<v Speaker 3>and that kind of institutional paranoia, that history of being

0:07:32.600 --> 0:07:35.480
<v Speaker 3>the little guy still very much present in what he's doing.

0:07:35.560 --> 0:07:38.280
<v Speaker 1>All right, thirty seconds left here, So who is most

0:07:38.360 --> 0:07:40.520
<v Speaker 1>likely to catch up to Nvidia? And when.

0:07:41.880 --> 0:07:45.520
<v Speaker 3>I mean for the talk to me this time next year,

0:07:45.560 --> 0:07:48.480
<v Speaker 3>And there might be somebody, but right now it looks

0:07:48.520 --> 0:07:50.400
<v Speaker 3>like everybody's just picking up the scraps.

0:07:51.200 --> 0:07:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Unbelievable and just a fascinating story. Ian, Thank you. I

0:07:55.560 --> 0:07:57.120
<v Speaker 1>know it's been a busy twenty four hours for you,

0:07:57.200 --> 0:07:59.880
<v Speaker 1>so we really appreciate it. Ian King. Are Us Semikin,

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:02.200
<v Speaker 1>actor and networking reporter at Bloomberg News joining us from

0:08:02.200 --> 0:08:05.560
<v Speaker 1>our San Francisco bureau as we mentioned, and VideA shares

0:08:05.600 --> 0:08:08.600
<v Speaker 1>continuing to trade higher, still up about ten percent in

0:08:08.640 --> 0:08:12.680
<v Speaker 1>today's session, and again you're now looking at a two

0:08:12.760 --> 0:08:15.720
<v Speaker 1>point five almost two point six trillion dollar market cap company,

0:08:15.760 --> 0:08:18.320
<v Speaker 1>so it is in the league of some of the

0:08:18.440 --> 0:08:20.560
<v Speaker 1>largest market cap companies in the world.

0:08:20.480 --> 0:08:23.280
<v Speaker 4>So far this year, Carol, this was after yesterday's block

0:08:23.600 --> 0:08:26.600
<v Speaker 4>yet last year's blockbuster year for the company in video

0:08:26.640 --> 0:08:29.360
<v Speaker 4>shares are hired by one hundred and eleven percent.

0:08:29.480 --> 0:08:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think it's the third best performing group in

0:08:31.680 --> 0:08:34.520
<v Speaker 1>the name in the S and P this year, after

0:08:34.559 --> 0:08:35.760
<v Speaker 1>being number one last year.

0:08:36.520 --> 0:08:40.040
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast catch US

0:08:40.080 --> 0:08:43.319
<v Speaker 2>Live weekday afternoons from two to five pm Eastern Listen

0:08:43.360 --> 0:08:45.520
<v Speaker 2>on Apple card Play and then brought auto with a

0:08:45.520 --> 0:08:48.559
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Business app, or watch US Live on YouTube.

0:08:49.679 --> 0:08:52.800
<v Speaker 5>Well for November presidential election in US, now less than

0:08:52.840 --> 0:08:55.680
<v Speaker 5>six months away, there's a new variable to consider, and

0:08:55.760 --> 0:08:58.360
<v Speaker 5>as far fetched as it may sound, the prospect of

0:08:58.440 --> 0:09:01.360
<v Speaker 5>Donald Trump, should he find himself back in the Oval

0:09:01.400 --> 0:09:04.319
<v Speaker 5>Office and then never leaving, is weighing big time on

0:09:04.360 --> 0:09:05.559
<v Speaker 5>the minds of some voters.

0:09:05.720 --> 0:09:08.560
<v Speaker 4>The story featured in the forthcoming issue of BusinessWeek magazine,

0:09:08.600 --> 0:09:11.360
<v Speaker 4>soon on newstands and now at on Bloomberg dot com

0:09:11.400 --> 0:09:13.839
<v Speaker 4>and at Bloomberg dot com Slash BusinessWeek, also of course

0:09:14.080 --> 0:09:16.480
<v Speaker 4>on the terminal with more on his story, Bloomberg businesswek

0:09:16.559 --> 0:09:19.520
<v Speaker 4>national correspondent Josh Green. Josh the author of The Rebels

0:09:19.559 --> 0:09:22.360
<v Speaker 4>Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders, AOC and The Rise of the

0:09:22.400 --> 0:09:25.840
<v Speaker 4>New Left. Also the author of the bestseller Devil's Bargain

0:09:25.920 --> 0:09:28.800
<v Speaker 4>Steve Bennon, Donald Trump and the Storming of the Presidency.

0:09:28.880 --> 0:09:32.080
<v Speaker 4>Josh joins us from our Washington, DC bureau. Josh, what's

0:09:32.080 --> 0:09:35.320
<v Speaker 4>going on here with the former president's rhetoric? What his

0:09:35.400 --> 0:09:39.600
<v Speaker 4>advisors close to him? Are telling you, and the idea

0:09:39.640 --> 0:09:43.440
<v Speaker 4>of taking him seriously but not literally kind of comes

0:09:43.480 --> 0:09:44.320
<v Speaker 4>to mind when I read this.

0:09:45.760 --> 0:09:48.720
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, well, I've been talking to a Republican and Democratic

0:09:48.760 --> 0:09:52.240
<v Speaker 6>strategist recently who'd mentioned that they were seeing something strange

0:09:52.320 --> 0:09:54.600
<v Speaker 6>in the focus groups and polls they were conducting, and

0:09:54.600 --> 0:09:57.840
<v Speaker 6>that is that a lot of swing voters were worried

0:09:57.880 --> 0:10:00.520
<v Speaker 6>that Trump was going to declare himself president for life

0:10:00.600 --> 0:10:03.360
<v Speaker 6>if he's reelected in November. And as I did some

0:10:03.440 --> 0:10:05.880
<v Speaker 6>reporting on the source of these worries, basically this is

0:10:05.880 --> 0:10:08.679
<v Speaker 6>something that Trump likes to joke about. Of course, there

0:10:08.760 --> 0:10:10.760
<v Speaker 6>was the January sixth riots that gave a lot of

0:10:10.760 --> 0:10:14.320
<v Speaker 6>people pause. But it's a factor that I think isn't

0:10:14.360 --> 0:10:17.679
<v Speaker 6>being paid a lot of attention to. But both Republican

0:10:17.720 --> 0:10:20.920
<v Speaker 6>and Democratic strategists are seeing it and wondering if this

0:10:20.960 --> 0:10:23.280
<v Speaker 6>is going to have an effect on the outcome in November.

0:10:23.679 --> 0:10:26.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's interesting and Josh, we don't certainly have

0:10:26.040 --> 0:10:29.679
<v Speaker 1>to tell you, but this idea that former president Donald

0:10:29.679 --> 0:10:31.839
<v Speaker 1>Trump will say something and people be like, well, that's

0:10:31.880 --> 0:10:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump, Like you know what I mean, They're kind

0:10:33.600 --> 0:10:37.880
<v Speaker 1>of dismissive. Is there something though different? As he runs

0:10:37.920 --> 0:10:39.880
<v Speaker 1>for a second go at the White House.

0:10:41.520 --> 0:10:42.959
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I think there are a couple of things. I mean,

0:10:42.960 --> 0:10:45.120
<v Speaker 6>as you mentioned, you know, the Trump people sort of

0:10:45.200 --> 0:10:47.520
<v Speaker 6>laugh this office. This is just Trump being Trump. You know.

0:10:47.559 --> 0:10:51.240
<v Speaker 6>He likes to say outrageous things to get a rise

0:10:51.280 --> 0:10:53.319
<v Speaker 6>out of liberals. He's talked a little bit about will

0:10:53.360 --> 0:10:56.840
<v Speaker 6>should I maybe serve three terms just this past weekend

0:10:57.120 --> 0:10:59.400
<v Speaker 6>an our rally, for instance. But while a lot of

0:10:59.400 --> 0:11:02.600
<v Speaker 6>people write off as just Trump being Trump, this particular

0:11:02.640 --> 0:11:04.760
<v Speaker 6>group of voters seems to be listening to it and

0:11:04.840 --> 0:11:08.840
<v Speaker 6>worrying about it. And as strategists have kind of plumbed

0:11:08.960 --> 0:11:12.000
<v Speaker 6>the reason for this, they've come up with some interesting theories,

0:11:12.440 --> 0:11:14.000
<v Speaker 6>And the best one I heard was that it was

0:11:14.080 --> 0:11:17.679
<v Speaker 6>really what was driving this fear was the Supreme Court's

0:11:17.720 --> 0:11:22.520
<v Speaker 6>decision to overturn Roe versus Wade. A Democratic strategist told

0:11:22.559 --> 0:11:25.440
<v Speaker 6>me that what that did was convince a lot of

0:11:25.559 --> 0:11:30.840
<v Speaker 6>ordinary voters that things they wouldn't have imagined possible, like

0:11:30.960 --> 0:11:35.720
<v Speaker 6>Rovers's way being overturned or Trump abolishing term limit suddenly

0:11:35.760 --> 0:11:38.440
<v Speaker 6>seemed real enough that these voters were worrying about it,

0:11:38.679 --> 0:11:40.480
<v Speaker 6>and it seemed to be pushing at least some of

0:11:40.520 --> 0:11:42.760
<v Speaker 6>them back into Joe Biden's camp.

0:11:43.040 --> 0:11:44.800
<v Speaker 4>Well, you get into the piece that the idea of

0:11:45.559 --> 0:11:49.280
<v Speaker 4>president serving only two terms, whether consecutive or not, hasn't

0:11:49.400 --> 0:11:52.280
<v Speaker 4>been in the Constitution since the days of the Founding

0:11:52.320 --> 0:11:54.680
<v Speaker 4>Fathers by any means. It was ratified in the nineteen

0:11:54.760 --> 0:11:58.840
<v Speaker 4>fifties after FDR served more than two terms. Can you

0:11:58.840 --> 0:12:01.440
<v Speaker 4>talk a little bit about the history of presidents since

0:12:01.559 --> 0:12:04.880
<v Speaker 4>nineteen fifty talking about the potential repealed the twenty second

0:12:04.880 --> 0:12:06.839
<v Speaker 4>Amendment or at least alluding to the idea of serving

0:12:06.880 --> 0:12:07.959
<v Speaker 4>more than two terms.

0:12:08.480 --> 0:12:08.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:12:08.720 --> 0:12:10.320
<v Speaker 6>Absolutely, I mean, as I did a kind of a

0:12:10.360 --> 0:12:13.520
<v Speaker 6>deep dive in this piece. What was interesting was almost

0:12:13.520 --> 0:12:16.080
<v Speaker 6>immediately when the twenty second Amend, after the twenty second

0:12:16.120 --> 0:12:20.480
<v Speaker 6>Amendment was passed, popular presidents and their advisors in both

0:12:20.520 --> 0:12:23.360
<v Speaker 6>parties have kind of objected to it. Ronald Reagan said

0:12:23.360 --> 0:12:25.560
<v Speaker 6>in nineteen eighty seven he would like to overturn it.

0:12:26.280 --> 0:12:30.040
<v Speaker 6>Democrats in the House of Representatives twice, once during Bill

0:12:30.080 --> 0:12:34.239
<v Speaker 6>Clinton's presidency once during Barack Obama's tried to push legislation

0:12:34.400 --> 0:12:38.319
<v Speaker 6>overturning it. So it's something that popular presidents sort of

0:12:38.440 --> 0:12:41.840
<v Speaker 6>chafe at. But that being said, that the hurdle to

0:12:41.960 --> 0:12:45.360
<v Speaker 6>actually get it overturned in abolished term limits is almost

0:12:45.440 --> 0:12:50.680
<v Speaker 6>unthinkably difficult. It would require large majorities in both houses

0:12:50.720 --> 0:12:55.719
<v Speaker 6>of Congress, that would require large majorities of state legislatures

0:12:55.720 --> 0:12:58.120
<v Speaker 6>to approve it. So it's not something that's plausibly going

0:12:58.200 --> 0:13:02.000
<v Speaker 6>to happen. And yet still people have learned that Trump

0:13:02.080 --> 0:13:04.920
<v Speaker 6>is a norm breaker. It's something that gives them pause

0:13:05.280 --> 0:13:07.240
<v Speaker 6>and it's weighing on them as they make their decision

0:13:07.240 --> 0:13:08.520
<v Speaker 6>on who to vote for in November.

0:13:08.559 --> 0:13:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Hey, Josh, there are focus groups, and then there are

0:13:10.520 --> 0:13:12.200
<v Speaker 1>focus groups by those who have been doing them for

0:13:12.240 --> 0:13:14.160
<v Speaker 1>some time that maybe you sit up a little bit

0:13:14.160 --> 0:13:16.360
<v Speaker 1>straighter and take note, and is that kind of what's

0:13:16.400 --> 0:13:18.440
<v Speaker 1>going on? Because I am curious. I think it was

0:13:18.480 --> 0:13:22.840
<v Speaker 1>the Democratic individual in your story from David Binder Research,

0:13:22.880 --> 0:13:26.600
<v Speaker 1>who's been doing these focus groups for a long time,

0:13:26.720 --> 0:13:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Like I just do wonder is there something that just

0:13:29.200 --> 0:13:31.640
<v Speaker 1>makes everybody kind of be like, wait a minute, there's

0:13:31.640 --> 0:13:34.080
<v Speaker 1>something different this time around, because you're like, as you said,

0:13:34.120 --> 0:13:36.280
<v Speaker 1>it not the first president to maybe say yeah, I'd

0:13:36.320 --> 0:13:37.240
<v Speaker 1>like another term.

0:13:37.760 --> 0:13:39.959
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I think that's I think that's exactly what's going on.

0:13:40.000 --> 0:13:42.400
<v Speaker 6>I mean, if you go back to twenty twenty and

0:13:42.880 --> 0:13:45.839
<v Speaker 6>the January sixth, Uprising. It's sort of shaken a lot

0:13:45.840 --> 0:13:49.000
<v Speaker 6>of people and made them realize that, well, maybe things

0:13:49.040 --> 0:13:52.360
<v Speaker 6>aren't as smooth as we expect. The focus group guy

0:13:52.400 --> 0:13:54.840
<v Speaker 6>that you were referring to has sort of said, you know, historically,

0:13:54.880 --> 0:13:57.600
<v Speaker 6>when we conduct these focus groups and we throw out

0:13:57.640 --> 0:14:01.160
<v Speaker 6>these kind of wild scenarios, val push back and say oh,

0:14:01.160 --> 0:14:04.120
<v Speaker 6>that could never happen. But that kind of pushback now,

0:14:04.880 --> 0:14:07.440
<v Speaker 6>he says, has stopped in his focus groups. I was

0:14:07.480 --> 0:14:09.520
<v Speaker 6>able to sit in on a couple of these and

0:14:09.520 --> 0:14:12.040
<v Speaker 6>sort of see this myself, and people are just much

0:14:12.080 --> 0:14:15.080
<v Speaker 6>more willing to believe that crazy things can happen, and

0:14:15.120 --> 0:14:17.360
<v Speaker 6>that maybe one of those crazy things will be Trump

0:14:18.040 --> 0:14:21.520
<v Speaker 6>declaring himself president for life. As implausible as that sounds,

0:14:21.560 --> 0:14:22.520
<v Speaker 6>I think to most voters.

0:14:22.600 --> 0:14:24.880
<v Speaker 4>Well, it was struck by a woman who you spoke

0:14:24.920 --> 0:14:28.080
<v Speaker 4>to who actually said that she would vote for Biden

0:14:28.240 --> 0:14:30.760
<v Speaker 4>even if he is in a coma, despite the fact

0:14:30.800 --> 0:14:34.040
<v Speaker 4>that back in twenty sixteen she voted for former President

0:14:34.080 --> 0:14:36.720
<v Speaker 4>Trump during that election. Talk to me a little bit

0:14:36.720 --> 0:14:39.440
<v Speaker 4>about her thinking, Josh, and how this could move the

0:14:39.440 --> 0:14:41.040
<v Speaker 4>needle with the undecided voters.

0:14:41.720 --> 0:14:44.320
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, Well, the people I was focusing on in this

0:14:44.400 --> 0:14:47.240
<v Speaker 6>piece really were that narrow group of undecided voters who

0:14:47.240 --> 0:14:50.040
<v Speaker 6>are going to decide the election. A lot of committed

0:14:50.080 --> 0:14:53.240
<v Speaker 6>Republicans like it when Trump talks about abolishing term moments.

0:14:53.680 --> 0:14:56.600
<v Speaker 6>A lot of Democrats like to get upset about it,

0:14:56.640 --> 0:14:59.080
<v Speaker 6>but their votes aren't really up for grabs on either side.

0:14:59.080 --> 0:15:01.520
<v Speaker 6>So the focus of these focus groups and the voters

0:15:01.520 --> 0:15:04.800
<v Speaker 6>that I talked to were people who had either been

0:15:05.280 --> 0:15:09.080
<v Speaker 6>former Trump voters former Biden voters, were now undecided. The

0:15:09.080 --> 0:15:12.080
<v Speaker 6>woman you mentioned, Laura McCammon, is a grandmother in Wisconsin

0:15:12.160 --> 0:15:14.960
<v Speaker 6>I talked to. Voted for Trump in twenty sixteen, but

0:15:15.040 --> 0:15:18.960
<v Speaker 6>as she's witnessed January sixth, she's listened to, you know,

0:15:19.160 --> 0:15:24.160
<v Speaker 6>maga media figures like Steve Bannon talk about multiple terms.

0:15:24.400 --> 0:15:27.040
<v Speaker 6>It scared her into deciding that she wouldn't risk another

0:15:27.120 --> 0:15:29.600
<v Speaker 6>vote for Donald Trump. And she told me, as you said,

0:15:29.600 --> 0:15:32.200
<v Speaker 6>she's planning to vote for Biden in November no matter what.

0:15:32.960 --> 0:15:35.720
<v Speaker 1>Hey, you know, while we have you and one thing

0:15:35.720 --> 0:15:37.320
<v Speaker 1>we wanted to ask you, and this was certainly a

0:15:37.360 --> 0:15:40.240
<v Speaker 1>story that we've been talking about this week a lot,

0:15:40.320 --> 0:15:43.840
<v Speaker 1>and this has to do with Donald Trump. A video

0:15:43.880 --> 0:15:47.800
<v Speaker 1>posted to his social media account the report, Yeah, to

0:15:47.880 --> 0:15:50.880
<v Speaker 1>his that referenced a unified Reich as a potential news

0:15:50.880 --> 0:15:53.960
<v Speaker 1>headline if you won a second term. You know, Devil's

0:15:53.960 --> 0:15:57.960
<v Speaker 1>Bargain bestseller, You know, you really got inside Steve Bannon

0:15:58.280 --> 0:16:01.000
<v Speaker 1>and the road to the White House for Donald Trump

0:16:01.080 --> 0:16:04.480
<v Speaker 1>the first go round. How are you thinking about some

0:16:04.680 --> 0:16:08.240
<v Speaker 1>of the terminology that's being used, the rhetoric that's being

0:16:08.400 --> 0:16:10.160
<v Speaker 1>used by Donald Trump.

0:16:11.280 --> 0:16:13.400
<v Speaker 6>Well, this is something that we've seen going all the

0:16:13.400 --> 0:16:15.760
<v Speaker 6>way back to Trump's first run in twenty fifteen and

0:16:15.800 --> 0:16:18.720
<v Speaker 6>twenty sixteen, that kind of winking at the far right,

0:16:18.880 --> 0:16:23.920
<v Speaker 6>either through phrases or memes or videos or what have you.

0:16:24.600 --> 0:16:26.600
<v Speaker 6>I don't know whether this was intentional or not, but

0:16:26.680 --> 0:16:31.000
<v Speaker 6>you know, given Trump's background, given the praise he heaped

0:16:31.040 --> 0:16:34.520
<v Speaker 6>on some of the Charlottesville protesters in twenty seventeen, another

0:16:34.560 --> 0:16:39.720
<v Speaker 6>earlier controversy over anti Semitism, it's something that people in

0:16:39.760 --> 0:16:41.320
<v Speaker 6>the press and people in the electro I think are

0:16:41.400 --> 0:16:43.560
<v Speaker 6>very alert. So something like this pops up in a

0:16:43.560 --> 0:16:46.320
<v Speaker 6>Trump video, you see the media pouncing, you see the

0:16:46.360 --> 0:16:50.400
<v Speaker 6>attention to it, and it's something that the Trump campaign,

0:16:50.520 --> 0:16:54.320
<v Speaker 6>either intentionally or unintentionally, hasn't really managed to fix and

0:16:54.360 --> 0:16:57.880
<v Speaker 6>bottle up. And kind of clean up their campaign. But

0:16:57.920 --> 0:16:59.760
<v Speaker 6>I think we can see based on this it's something

0:16:59.800 --> 0:17:01.040
<v Speaker 6>that we're going to have to keep an eye on

0:17:01.080 --> 0:17:01.920
<v Speaker 6>going forward.

0:17:01.680 --> 0:17:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Right and certainly those undecided voters are keeping an eye

0:17:04.240 --> 0:17:07.440
<v Speaker 1>on too. That maybe explains what you just talked about

0:17:07.480 --> 0:17:10.560
<v Speaker 1>in your story. Hey Bloomberg, Bloomberg Business Week National correspondent

0:17:10.640 --> 0:17:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Josh Green, Josh, thank you so much.

0:17:14.320 --> 0:17:18.160
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Listen live

0:17:18.280 --> 0:17:21.480
<v Speaker 2>each weekday starting at two pm Eastern on applecar Play

0:17:21.480 --> 0:17:24.159
<v Speaker 2>and and Royd Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. You

0:17:24.200 --> 0:17:27.480
<v Speaker 2>can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship

0:17:27.520 --> 0:17:41.080
<v Speaker 2>New York station, Just say Alexa Play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:17:41.160 --> 0:17:43.640
<v Speaker 4>Well, this graduation seasons over the next few weeks are

0:17:44.000 --> 0:17:46.760
<v Speaker 4>months hopefully young people will be going off to their

0:17:46.800 --> 0:17:51.040
<v Speaker 4>first post college jobs. Bloomberg opinion columnist Alison Schreeger covers economics,

0:17:51.040 --> 0:17:52.800
<v Speaker 4>and she writes in one of the most read stories

0:17:52.840 --> 0:17:55.440
<v Speaker 4>on the Bloomberg terminal about an interesting trend that she's noticed,

0:17:55.480 --> 0:17:58.359
<v Speaker 4>at least according to one recent survey, and that's that

0:17:58.480 --> 0:18:01.439
<v Speaker 4>more graduates are looking to job in the public sector.

0:18:01.520 --> 0:18:03.840
<v Speaker 1>They are Alison Schrager a Senior Fellow at the Manhattan

0:18:03.880 --> 0:18:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Institute in addition to being a Bloomberg Opinion columnist. She

0:18:06.560 --> 0:18:10.520
<v Speaker 1>jes us here in our Bloomberg Interactive broker's studio. So

0:18:10.840 --> 0:18:13.159
<v Speaker 1>an important caveat. Some of your best friends work in

0:18:13.160 --> 0:18:13.640
<v Speaker 1>the government.

0:18:14.160 --> 0:18:15.679
<v Speaker 7>Actually I don't have a lot of friends in government,

0:18:15.720 --> 0:18:18.480
<v Speaker 7>but you wrote in the piece. Yeah, but you know,

0:18:18.520 --> 0:18:21.960
<v Speaker 7>there's no shame. I mean, it's a reasonable, it's a

0:18:22.000 --> 0:18:23.200
<v Speaker 7>respectable career path.

0:18:23.960 --> 0:18:24.199
<v Speaker 8>It is.

0:18:24.280 --> 0:18:26.160
<v Speaker 1>We all know people who work in the government. All right,

0:18:26.200 --> 0:18:27.679
<v Speaker 1>tell us what's going on. I have a twenty one

0:18:27.720 --> 0:18:29.439
<v Speaker 1>year old just get one more year in college, but

0:18:29.640 --> 0:18:34.800
<v Speaker 1>I will say that working in the government is certainly

0:18:35.000 --> 0:18:35.760
<v Speaker 1>on her radar.

0:18:36.240 --> 0:18:38.800
<v Speaker 7>Really, yes, well, because I was surprised because the survey,

0:18:39.080 --> 0:18:41.320
<v Speaker 7>you know, did a lot of sort of hype about, ooh,

0:18:41.440 --> 0:18:43.240
<v Speaker 7>government is up and tech is down. And then you

0:18:43.240 --> 0:18:45.480
<v Speaker 7>saw the numbers and it was like up from five

0:18:45.520 --> 0:18:47.360
<v Speaker 7>and a half to seven and a half percent and

0:18:47.760 --> 0:18:49.679
<v Speaker 7>tech is down from twenty three to twenty one. So

0:18:49.680 --> 0:18:51.840
<v Speaker 7>you're like, all right, well, mean, people still prefer tech.

0:18:52.240 --> 0:18:54.919
<v Speaker 7>But what really concerned me was that there was another

0:18:55.600 --> 0:18:57.440
<v Speaker 7>like the listing of what you're looking for in a job,

0:18:57.560 --> 0:19:01.480
<v Speaker 7>and the number one thing by far overwhelming was stability,

0:19:02.080 --> 0:19:05.520
<v Speaker 7>and last was a fast growing company, which is just

0:19:05.560 --> 0:19:07.360
<v Speaker 7>like when you're young. I mean, like if you get

0:19:07.359 --> 0:19:09.040
<v Speaker 7>on a fast grown company path, like this is how

0:19:09.080 --> 0:19:10.359
<v Speaker 7>you get like rich and successful.

0:19:10.400 --> 0:19:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Well, we love how you start the story, like in

0:19:11.960 --> 0:19:14.359
<v Speaker 1>a week where we have been obsessed with Nvidia and

0:19:14.440 --> 0:19:16.919
<v Speaker 1>still are that. Everybody's looking for their Nvidia, right, you

0:19:16.960 --> 0:19:18.520
<v Speaker 1>want to be with that company that's going to be

0:19:18.560 --> 0:19:20.840
<v Speaker 1>the hot new thing. Hopefully get in early, get options,

0:19:20.840 --> 0:19:22.280
<v Speaker 1>and make a lot of money, like that's it.

0:19:22.400 --> 0:19:25.320
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, but no, they want stability.

0:19:26.080 --> 0:19:27.760
<v Speaker 1>I will I will say for my daughter, I don't

0:19:27.800 --> 0:19:29.240
<v Speaker 1>know that that's it. She's gonna hate me that I'm

0:19:29.280 --> 0:19:29.919
<v Speaker 1>talking about her.

0:19:30.280 --> 0:19:31.440
<v Speaker 4>She's not even a senior.

0:19:32.280 --> 0:19:35.800
<v Speaker 1>No, but they start early and there's a lot of pressure,

0:19:36.119 --> 0:19:39.600
<v Speaker 1>but on way to doing something, probably in the private

0:19:39.640 --> 0:19:43.080
<v Speaker 1>sector and possibly in the investment world. But that experience

0:19:43.200 --> 0:19:44.800
<v Speaker 1>is certainly looked at highly.

0:19:45.840 --> 0:19:48.000
<v Speaker 8>I can be. I guess it depends on what you do.

0:19:48.080 --> 0:19:50.240
<v Speaker 7>I mean, I think what struck me about it is

0:19:50.280 --> 0:19:50.600
<v Speaker 7>it's like.

0:19:50.560 --> 0:19:52.680
<v Speaker 8>There's been a downward trend of working in the government.

0:19:52.960 --> 0:19:55.520
<v Speaker 7>So of course, but we've had a lot of new

0:19:55.560 --> 0:19:57.840
<v Speaker 7>policies in the last couple of years that aim to

0:19:57.840 --> 0:20:00.760
<v Speaker 7>grow the government and grown many Facturing was also a

0:20:00.800 --> 0:20:04.480
<v Speaker 7>big growth area in terms of job interest, So I

0:20:04.520 --> 0:20:07.520
<v Speaker 7>mean these are policy priorities, So maybe it reflects that.

0:20:07.840 --> 0:20:10.280
<v Speaker 4>What does it tell you about the idea of stability

0:20:10.280 --> 0:20:12.560
<v Speaker 4>in the way that some graduates might be looking for

0:20:12.640 --> 0:20:15.480
<v Speaker 4>more stability rather than that path to being the next

0:20:15.600 --> 0:20:17.280
<v Speaker 4>next Jets and Wong, Well.

0:20:17.080 --> 0:20:19.520
<v Speaker 7>I mean there is all this evidence, like Genie Twang's

0:20:19.600 --> 0:20:22.160
<v Speaker 7>Generations that has all this evidence that young people are

0:20:22.160 --> 0:20:25.600
<v Speaker 7>more risk averse, So I guess, I mean, I think

0:20:25.680 --> 0:20:27.480
<v Speaker 7>that that would be the concern is that they're going

0:20:27.520 --> 0:20:30.919
<v Speaker 7>to be less dynamic and less risk takers, which you

0:20:30.960 --> 0:20:33.320
<v Speaker 7>know means less growth for the future, which you know,

0:20:33.359 --> 0:20:35.199
<v Speaker 7>we need them to pay for all of our retirements.

0:20:35.200 --> 0:20:35.960
<v Speaker 8>So that's not good.

0:20:37.040 --> 0:20:38.240
<v Speaker 1>I've already worn my daughter.

0:20:39.119 --> 0:20:43.040
<v Speaker 7>But so I said, it could reflect that that like, hey,

0:20:43.119 --> 0:20:44.480
<v Speaker 7>you know, I don't want to be at that fast

0:20:44.480 --> 0:20:46.920
<v Speaker 7>grown company. I just want the stability, and that might

0:20:46.960 --> 0:20:48.720
<v Speaker 7>reflect more risk a version. Also, I mean, this is

0:20:48.760 --> 0:20:51.560
<v Speaker 7>a generation, this is a very tumultuous last couple of years,

0:20:51.840 --> 0:20:54.480
<v Speaker 7>so I mean maybe the stability is just very appealing

0:20:54.680 --> 0:20:56.760
<v Speaker 7>after you know, having their end of high school and

0:20:56.800 --> 0:20:59.080
<v Speaker 7>honestly almost their entire college career.

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:00.840
<v Speaker 8>Being credibly charel, I.

0:21:00.800 --> 0:21:03.560
<v Speaker 4>Will say, there's also this revolving door between the government

0:21:03.560 --> 0:21:07.120
<v Speaker 4>and the private sector, and yes, it's pretty incredible to see,

0:21:07.119 --> 0:21:10.159
<v Speaker 4>and especially with politicians in the House and Senate. Like

0:21:10.520 --> 0:21:13.960
<v Speaker 4>ex politicians go from making what I think close to

0:21:13.960 --> 0:21:16.240
<v Speaker 4>two hundred thousand dollars a year maybe as a member

0:21:16.280 --> 0:21:18.760
<v Speaker 4>of the House, to like eight hundred thousand dollars a

0:21:18.800 --> 0:21:21.720
<v Speaker 4>year being a consultant for some of the companies or

0:21:22.520 --> 0:21:25.879
<v Speaker 4>industries that they used to actually legislate. And I wonder

0:21:25.880 --> 0:21:27.920
<v Speaker 4>if there's any sort of visibility there.

0:21:28.119 --> 0:21:30.600
<v Speaker 7>Well, you know, it's kind of weird to say, but

0:21:30.680 --> 0:21:34.280
<v Speaker 7>I hope that's it. At least there's some ambition, because

0:21:34.440 --> 0:21:35.840
<v Speaker 7>I think when I think of most people aspiring to

0:21:35.840 --> 0:21:37.920
<v Speaker 7>work at government, especially where most of the government jobs are,

0:21:37.960 --> 0:21:40.040
<v Speaker 7>it's like at the state and local level, Yeah, which

0:21:40.080 --> 0:21:42.959
<v Speaker 7>is you know, more like parks and recreation. Yeah, so

0:21:44.080 --> 0:21:45.399
<v Speaker 7>you know they're working for the SEC.

0:21:45.560 --> 0:21:46.360
<v Speaker 1>Which could be fun.

0:21:46.560 --> 0:21:48.360
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, just kidding, Yeah, it totally could.

0:21:48.359 --> 0:21:50.640
<v Speaker 7>Again, someone needs to make the world work. And when

0:21:50.640 --> 0:21:53.560
<v Speaker 7>I posted the column on Twitter, so many people wrote

0:21:53.560 --> 0:21:54.120
<v Speaker 7>and they're.

0:21:53.920 --> 0:21:55.080
<v Speaker 8>Like, excellent, it's great.

0:21:55.080 --> 0:21:58.399
<v Speaker 7>People of such a great sense of service, which I've

0:21:58.480 --> 0:21:59.040
<v Speaker 7>then felt bad.

0:21:59.080 --> 0:22:00.159
<v Speaker 8>That's not what occurred to me.

0:22:00.520 --> 0:22:03.200
<v Speaker 4>That's that's interesting. Why do you think that didn't occur

0:22:03.240 --> 0:22:03.439
<v Speaker 4>to you?

0:22:04.000 --> 0:22:07.199
<v Speaker 7>Because I've never worked in the government, actually not the

0:22:07.280 --> 0:22:08.960
<v Speaker 7>US government, But I mean I always thought of it

0:22:09.000 --> 0:22:11.240
<v Speaker 7>as being sort of like boring and stay safe, and

0:22:11.240 --> 0:22:13.159
<v Speaker 7>I always want to like do something, you know, a

0:22:13.200 --> 0:22:15.520
<v Speaker 7>little bit. But I mean that might be my bias.

0:22:15.840 --> 0:22:17.679
<v Speaker 7>Maybe I also don't have a good sense of service.

0:22:18.359 --> 0:22:21.439
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that that is super interesting. And I

0:22:21.480 --> 0:22:24.040
<v Speaker 1>do think that maybe there are like we've gone through

0:22:24.080 --> 0:22:26.680
<v Speaker 1>some generations where it's like big government, what do they do?

0:22:26.800 --> 0:22:27.960
<v Speaker 8>It's those people there.

0:22:27.760 --> 0:22:29.359
<v Speaker 1>Forever and you know, you have to dust them off

0:22:29.440 --> 0:22:32.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing. Forgive me not my view what people say,

0:22:32.560 --> 0:22:35.560
<v Speaker 1>but I do like I am encouraged when I hear

0:22:35.600 --> 0:22:38.400
<v Speaker 1>a younger individuals say I want to be part of government,

0:22:38.440 --> 0:22:39.959
<v Speaker 1>like I want to help. I want to help, you know,

0:22:40.080 --> 0:22:42.960
<v Speaker 1>create policy. I want to do that. And so I

0:22:43.320 --> 0:22:44.399
<v Speaker 1>think that's kind of interesting.

0:22:44.520 --> 0:22:45.920
<v Speaker 7>You see, like a lot of these jobs are like

0:22:45.960 --> 0:22:48.000
<v Speaker 7>the stay and local level. They're not glamorous, but they

0:22:48.080 --> 0:22:50.239
<v Speaker 7>really are important and you know, we all need them

0:22:50.240 --> 0:22:50.960
<v Speaker 7>to make the world go.

0:22:51.000 --> 0:22:53.919
<v Speaker 1>Round exactly one line I love in your column. What

0:22:53.960 --> 0:22:56.080
<v Speaker 1>explains this shift? Perhaps they just feel grateful to be

0:22:56.119 --> 0:22:59.240
<v Speaker 1>working because like this idea, and I've heard this from

0:22:59.440 --> 0:23:01.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, very graduates, like it's tough the job market

0:23:01.840 --> 0:23:04.639
<v Speaker 1>out there, which is amazing because we talk about it

0:23:04.640 --> 0:23:06.760
<v Speaker 1>being tight and that there are jobs out there, but

0:23:06.840 --> 0:23:08.280
<v Speaker 1>that many are finding it tricky.

0:23:08.359 --> 0:23:09.960
<v Speaker 7>I think I want to come about this a couple

0:23:10.000 --> 0:23:13.199
<v Speaker 7>of weeks, or maybe it was last week that you know.

0:23:13.280 --> 0:23:15.200
<v Speaker 8>I think we often confuse.

0:23:15.000 --> 0:23:18.160
<v Speaker 7>Forget about the fact that we talk about generational strife.

0:23:18.320 --> 0:23:21.440
<v Speaker 7>Yea that like your first job, getting that first job

0:23:21.480 --> 0:23:23.560
<v Speaker 7>and getting that good first job and getting a foothold

0:23:23.560 --> 0:23:25.439
<v Speaker 7>in your career is always hard, and it's hard for

0:23:25.480 --> 0:23:26.080
<v Speaker 7>every generation.

0:23:26.160 --> 0:23:26.800
<v Speaker 8>It was hard for us.

0:23:26.800 --> 0:23:28.280
<v Speaker 1>Took me a year and a half to finally get

0:23:28.359 --> 0:23:30.400
<v Speaker 1>something and not settle, to be quite honest.

0:23:30.440 --> 0:23:32.199
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, and we get into these generational ships. But I

0:23:32.200 --> 0:23:34.439
<v Speaker 7>think it just doesn't change. It's just it's hard to

0:23:34.480 --> 0:23:37.080
<v Speaker 7>become an adult and it's hard to make that transition

0:23:37.160 --> 0:23:39.600
<v Speaker 7>into the like having a career and feeling stable in

0:23:39.640 --> 0:23:40.119
<v Speaker 7>your career.

0:23:40.200 --> 0:23:42.120
<v Speaker 8>And it's never going to be easy for anyone because

0:23:42.119 --> 0:23:44.160
<v Speaker 8>we don't want to be adults, Tip and I we're

0:23:44.160 --> 0:23:44.760
<v Speaker 8>talking about.

0:23:44.640 --> 0:23:48.280
<v Speaker 7>This generation does though apparently like they're not looking to

0:23:48.280 --> 0:23:50.160
<v Speaker 7>be like poets somewhere, they want the government job.

0:23:50.240 --> 0:23:53.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, at the end of the day, it's just one survey.

0:23:55.240 --> 0:23:56.520
<v Speaker 4>Do we have to think about that a lot?

0:23:57.000 --> 0:23:59.080
<v Speaker 7>Well, you know, I would, that's you know, and it's

0:23:59.080 --> 0:24:01.760
<v Speaker 7>a small survey. It's only like twenty three hundred people.

0:24:01.760 --> 0:24:03.240
<v Speaker 7>I think the reason why I felt like it was

0:24:03.280 --> 0:24:05.600
<v Speaker 7>worth writing about though, is it does seem in line

0:24:05.640 --> 0:24:08.280
<v Speaker 7>with other surveys I've seen that put such a high

0:24:08.280 --> 0:24:09.359
<v Speaker 7>premium on stability.

0:24:09.560 --> 0:24:11.359
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, such an aversion to risk.

0:24:11.440 --> 0:24:13.879
<v Speaker 7>So it's consistent with that, because yeah, normally you wouldn't

0:24:13.880 --> 0:24:17.359
<v Speaker 7>be like, okay, five survey of twenty five hundred people

0:24:17.520 --> 0:24:19.760
<v Speaker 7>like two percent more when working government, big deal. But

0:24:19.800 --> 0:24:21.800
<v Speaker 7>I do it does seem consistent with other things. And

0:24:22.040 --> 0:24:24.560
<v Speaker 7>I was struck by they had an interesting chart where

0:24:24.560 --> 0:24:27.720
<v Speaker 7>they did the correlation of where job opportunities are and

0:24:28.080 --> 0:24:30.879
<v Speaker 7>it was a very sort of perfect correlation with you know,

0:24:30.920 --> 0:24:33.720
<v Speaker 7>people feeling like disenchanted with finance and tech and more

0:24:33.920 --> 0:24:35.840
<v Speaker 7>with government and manufacturing.

0:24:36.320 --> 0:24:38.320
<v Speaker 1>I will say that, you know, having covered a lot

0:24:38.320 --> 0:24:41.359
<v Speaker 1>of different business cycles, that I do feel like companies

0:24:41.359 --> 0:24:44.040
<v Speaker 1>are very very quick that if there's some pressure something,

0:24:44.040 --> 0:24:47.520
<v Speaker 1>they'll cut jobs, they'll cut costs because that's what certainly

0:24:47.520 --> 0:24:50.400
<v Speaker 1>they're publicly held, that's what Wall Street and investors want.

0:24:50.520 --> 0:24:53.960
<v Speaker 1>So you know that can be pretty uncomfortable to be around.

0:24:54.119 --> 0:24:56.240
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, although we do think of government is more stable.

0:24:56.280 --> 0:24:58.040
<v Speaker 7>But I mean, especially if you're working at the state

0:24:58.080 --> 0:25:00.520
<v Speaker 7>and local level, I mean a stall finances, you're not

0:25:00.560 --> 0:25:01.720
<v Speaker 7>good that actually you might be better.

0:25:01.600 --> 0:25:04.000
<v Speaker 4>Off in the video or maybe if you're in a

0:25:04.400 --> 0:25:05.880
<v Speaker 4>part of a cabinet thousand.

0:25:06.080 --> 0:25:08.119
<v Speaker 8>Sorry sorry to throw water on your safety.

0:25:08.680 --> 0:25:09.879
<v Speaker 4>The presidential administration.

0:25:10.359 --> 0:25:13.200
<v Speaker 7>You never know what's going to happen, remember, really really

0:25:13.200 --> 0:25:13.720
<v Speaker 7>fun column.

0:25:13.760 --> 0:25:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Something to think about though, And like I said, just

0:25:15.640 --> 0:25:18.000
<v Speaker 1>talking with my daughter and some of her friends, like

0:25:18.119 --> 0:25:20.760
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting that they are looking at this and kind

0:25:20.760 --> 0:25:29.960
<v Speaker 1>of in it. They'll be grad school fortunately, Oh discuss

0:25:30.080 --> 0:25:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Allison Schrager, Senior Fellow at the Manhattan Institute and Bloomberg

0:25:32.800 --> 0:25:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Opinion Columns. Check out more.

0:25:34.520 --> 0:25:41.120
<v Speaker 2>I'd be go mac journal.

0:25:42.119 --> 0:25:43.120
<v Speaker 5>How about you let me drive?

0:25:43.600 --> 0:25:46.760
<v Speaker 8>No, no, no, no, who's going alright?

0:25:46.960 --> 0:25:47.280
<v Speaker 6>Please?

0:25:47.400 --> 0:25:49.360
<v Speaker 2>I'll gravelt.

0:25:49.920 --> 0:25:52.400
<v Speaker 1>I want to try.

0:25:50.640 --> 0:25:53.800
<v Speaker 7>It's a good question.

0:25:57.600 --> 0:26:01.080
<v Speaker 2>This is the drive to the clothes ung for me think. Well,

0:26:02.800 --> 0:26:10.520
<v Speaker 2>on Bloomberg Radio.

0:26:08.040 --> 0:26:10.400
<v Speaker 1>All right, everybody, we're driving to the clothes. We're talking

0:26:10.400 --> 0:26:11.680
<v Speaker 1>with Bill Maloney.

0:26:11.240 --> 0:26:12.880
<v Speaker 4>Because because he's a legend.

0:26:13.119 --> 0:26:15.160
<v Speaker 1>It's yeah, he's a legend, and it's also just kind

0:26:15.160 --> 0:26:18.240
<v Speaker 1>of an interesting market and it's just you know, here,

0:26:18.280 --> 0:26:20.160
<v Speaker 1>you think, and Vidi's going to come out of the gate,

0:26:20.760 --> 0:26:22.960
<v Speaker 1>and it is doing. It is rallying in a big way,

0:26:23.000 --> 0:26:25.879
<v Speaker 1>no doubt about it. But you're not seeing it translate

0:26:25.960 --> 0:26:29.200
<v Speaker 1>across And even though we did see some enthusiasm out

0:26:29.240 --> 0:26:32.520
<v Speaker 1>of the gate earlier, we were just talking about the

0:26:32.600 --> 0:26:35.880
<v Speaker 1>hot manufacturing data. We talked about that with Stuart Paul earlier,

0:26:36.200 --> 0:26:38.680
<v Speaker 1>and it just is enough to push up yields hired

0:26:38.680 --> 0:26:41.800
<v Speaker 1>and it makes everybody kind of rethink, all right, you know,

0:26:41.960 --> 0:26:45.400
<v Speaker 1>where's our environment right now? Hen tick, he says, he's

0:26:45.440 --> 0:26:46.440
<v Speaker 1>like just focusing.

0:26:46.359 --> 0:26:49.679
<v Speaker 4>SQUA on the Bloomberg terminal s qua. Yeah, that's how

0:26:49.720 --> 0:26:52.160
<v Speaker 4>you get to audio squak and you can hear Bill

0:26:52.200 --> 0:26:53.120
<v Speaker 4>Maloney all day.

0:26:53.240 --> 0:26:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Worth listening to, all right. Also worth listening to is

0:26:55.640 --> 0:26:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Lauren san Felipo. She's senior investment strategist from Maryland Bank

0:26:58.800 --> 0:27:02.040
<v Speaker 1>of America's private bank. Joins US Bank of America Private Bank,

0:27:02.080 --> 0:27:04.840
<v Speaker 1>I should say she is joining us from New York City, Lauren,

0:27:04.920 --> 0:27:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Good to have you here with us. I'm always interested

0:27:08.200 --> 0:27:12.399
<v Speaker 1>because you guys have wealthy clients, those who deal with

0:27:12.440 --> 0:27:14.560
<v Speaker 1>you in the private bank. What do they want to

0:27:14.600 --> 0:27:15.640
<v Speaker 1>know about this environment?

0:27:18.000 --> 0:27:20.679
<v Speaker 9>Well, for sure, they want to be opportunistic here up

0:27:20.720 --> 0:27:23.199
<v Speaker 9>ahead of the election. They're watching a market that just

0:27:23.240 --> 0:27:25.919
<v Speaker 9>seems to be straight up into the right. And you know,

0:27:26.000 --> 0:27:28.200
<v Speaker 9>I'd say what we're telling them on a sector level

0:27:28.200 --> 0:27:30.400
<v Speaker 9>at least, is to buy energy here. We think it's

0:27:30.440 --> 0:27:32.800
<v Speaker 9>a great place to put money to work. We're looking

0:27:32.840 --> 0:27:36.399
<v Speaker 9>at some good balance sheets for energy valuation still attractive.

0:27:36.880 --> 0:27:39.400
<v Speaker 9>You know, there's still that energy transition that's in front

0:27:39.440 --> 0:27:41.560
<v Speaker 9>of us. So you know, we try to be opportunistic

0:27:41.560 --> 0:27:42.320
<v Speaker 9>with our clients.

0:27:42.400 --> 0:27:43.920
<v Speaker 4>Why is energy attractive?

0:27:43.960 --> 0:27:44.200
<v Speaker 2>Few?

0:27:46.640 --> 0:27:49.200
<v Speaker 9>So, as I said, they have those Fortress balance sheets.

0:27:49.240 --> 0:27:51.320
<v Speaker 9>You know, I think another way to think about it though,

0:27:51.359 --> 0:27:53.920
<v Speaker 9>some of these long arc stories, and I think this

0:27:54.119 --> 0:27:58.159
<v Speaker 9>market likes narratives. We think about hard assets, hard power,

0:27:58.200 --> 0:28:01.880
<v Speaker 9>and hard hats. We like hard assets that commodities tilts

0:28:01.920 --> 0:28:05.880
<v Speaker 9>just as an inflation head, geopolitical risk kedge, hard power.

0:28:05.920 --> 0:28:08.200
<v Speaker 9>We think about the fact that security the world we're

0:28:08.240 --> 0:28:12.280
<v Speaker 9>living in, right, cybersecurity that's also included under hard power

0:28:12.280 --> 0:28:15.600
<v Speaker 9>and then hard hats. We have these massive legislative packages

0:28:16.320 --> 0:28:18.679
<v Speaker 9>out there are they're being awarded now to companies, and

0:28:18.760 --> 0:28:20.760
<v Speaker 9>you know, the spending stickets are clearly open.

0:28:21.359 --> 0:28:24.080
<v Speaker 1>So narratives I like it, And you said kind of

0:28:24.119 --> 0:28:28.080
<v Speaker 1>like hard assets. It sounds like, what's interesting is AI

0:28:28.280 --> 0:28:30.280
<v Speaker 1>in a day when we're focused on Nvidia, which is

0:28:30.320 --> 0:28:33.119
<v Speaker 1>doing very well compared to the rest of the market,

0:28:33.560 --> 0:28:37.960
<v Speaker 1>soaring in today's session, what's the AI narrative and AI

0:28:38.240 --> 0:28:41.320
<v Speaker 1>investment play that you think makes the most sense? Is

0:28:41.360 --> 0:28:44.120
<v Speaker 1>it the hard asset play if you will, like the

0:28:44.160 --> 0:28:48.480
<v Speaker 1>power centers needed to power the data centers. Pull that

0:28:48.560 --> 0:28:49.800
<v Speaker 1>line through for us, if you.

0:28:49.720 --> 0:28:54.440
<v Speaker 9>Would, Carol, Yeah, I agree. This is sort of a

0:28:54.520 --> 0:28:58.120
<v Speaker 9>both story in the sense it's software and hardware. So AI.

0:28:58.200 --> 0:29:00.520
<v Speaker 9>We still believe AI has a place in moor folios

0:29:00.600 --> 0:29:02.960
<v Speaker 9>core holdings, right. I don't know if you buy it

0:29:03.000 --> 0:29:06.239
<v Speaker 9>at this level today. Valuations have obviously run up, but

0:29:06.800 --> 0:29:10.520
<v Speaker 9>you know, I think AI's impacts will be measured in years.

0:29:10.560 --> 0:29:13.640
<v Speaker 9>It's not like a quarter to quarter type play. We're

0:29:13.680 --> 0:29:16.760
<v Speaker 9>seeing though. Some real profitability comes through though on this

0:29:16.880 --> 0:29:20.640
<v Speaker 9>whole early innings of this AI revolution. So it's a

0:29:20.680 --> 0:29:25.280
<v Speaker 9>hardware and software play for sure, and data center is

0:29:25.360 --> 0:29:29.200
<v Speaker 9>certainly part of that story. Power electricity, GPUs, the whole,

0:29:29.320 --> 0:29:31.080
<v Speaker 9>the whole sort of ecosystem.

0:29:31.480 --> 0:29:33.520
<v Speaker 4>Which part of the ecosystem are you most bullish on.

0:29:35.840 --> 0:29:38.920
<v Speaker 9>Right now? I mean utilities. It's it's kind of like

0:29:38.960 --> 0:29:41.640
<v Speaker 9>the underdog story, right I mean, I think it's the

0:29:41.760 --> 0:29:44.440
<v Speaker 9>tertiary sort of the fact that utilities are defensive. So

0:29:44.760 --> 0:29:47.720
<v Speaker 9>he sort of saw utilities work really well last month

0:29:47.800 --> 0:29:51.080
<v Speaker 9>April when we had that pullback in the market overall,

0:29:51.760 --> 0:29:54.560
<v Speaker 9>But it's that power producer. It's the setup is right there.

0:29:54.640 --> 0:29:58.040
<v Speaker 9>I mean, we need more electricity devoted to those GPUs,

0:29:58.120 --> 0:30:01.280
<v Speaker 9>the data centers. Then you start thinking about cooling equipment,

0:30:01.400 --> 0:30:03.400
<v Speaker 9>and you know, there's just a lot of tentacles to

0:30:03.440 --> 0:30:03.959
<v Speaker 9>the story.

0:30:05.400 --> 0:30:08.800
<v Speaker 1>Interesting, and I'm looking at utility is it's your third

0:30:08.880 --> 0:30:12.320
<v Speaker 1>best major industry group out of eleven in the S

0:30:12.360 --> 0:30:15.720
<v Speaker 1>and P five hundred for the year, up about eleven percent.

0:30:15.800 --> 0:30:19.160
<v Speaker 1>Above it though infotech, which is up seventeen percent, communication

0:30:19.280 --> 0:30:22.320
<v Speaker 1>services up almost twenty percent here, So investors, we know

0:30:22.720 --> 0:30:25.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of what's been some of the trends here. I

0:30:25.600 --> 0:30:27.840
<v Speaker 1>don't know, how do you look at this market more

0:30:27.880 --> 0:30:31.440
<v Speaker 1>broadly in terms of I don't know, does it need

0:30:31.440 --> 0:30:33.920
<v Speaker 1>a breather? Are you thinking about rates on a regular

0:30:33.960 --> 0:30:36.960
<v Speaker 1>basis and the implications of that. It just kind of

0:30:36.960 --> 0:30:41.200
<v Speaker 1>feels like day to day a bit manic in terms

0:30:41.280 --> 0:30:45.520
<v Speaker 1>of what we think might happen next manic.

0:30:45.560 --> 0:30:47.560
<v Speaker 9>It's probably a good way to put it, I'd say, though.

0:30:47.560 --> 0:30:49.920
<v Speaker 9>There are plenty of reasons though, to still be positive

0:30:49.960 --> 0:30:52.680
<v Speaker 9>on the market without getting tumnic about it. I mean,

0:30:52.720 --> 0:30:56.440
<v Speaker 9>consumers are still spending, right, Businesses are still investing. There's

0:30:56.480 --> 0:30:58.560
<v Speaker 9>a lot of capex. I mean, I think that's one

0:30:58.680 --> 0:31:03.760
<v Speaker 9>great underlying thing we learned from earning season this quarter. Right,

0:31:03.920 --> 0:31:06.840
<v Speaker 9>Businesses are certainly so investing, capics putting up big numbers

0:31:06.880 --> 0:31:09.960
<v Speaker 9>buy backs. I mean we even Atlanta fed GDP at

0:31:09.960 --> 0:31:12.720
<v Speaker 9>an estimate of three point six percent, so and we're

0:31:12.760 --> 0:31:14.760
<v Speaker 9>more than halfway through, right, I mean, we're closing in

0:31:14.800 --> 0:31:18.320
<v Speaker 9>here on then to met here. So a lot to

0:31:18.400 --> 0:31:20.360
<v Speaker 9>still be positive. I mean, try not to be too

0:31:20.400 --> 0:31:22.960
<v Speaker 9>manic about it, but there's a lot out there we

0:31:23.240 --> 0:31:23.760
<v Speaker 9>pullish on.

0:31:23.960 --> 0:31:28.760
<v Speaker 4>What out there concerns you though, Yeah.

0:31:28.600 --> 0:31:31.520
<v Speaker 9>So inflation sticky, I mean isn't that the obvious answer.

0:31:32.360 --> 0:31:35.440
<v Speaker 9>It's going to be the predominant focus now for once

0:31:35.480 --> 0:31:37.920
<v Speaker 9>we close in on the end of earning season, and

0:31:37.960 --> 0:31:40.360
<v Speaker 9>then the focus for markets really will shift back to

0:31:40.360 --> 0:31:43.720
<v Speaker 9>that macro data, So inflation for sure. You know, I

0:31:43.720 --> 0:31:48.360
<v Speaker 9>think another risk, volatility is basically absent. I think volatility

0:31:48.360 --> 0:31:51.240
<v Speaker 9>is already already on vacation right now. The VIX is

0:31:51.280 --> 0:31:54.760
<v Speaker 9>super subdued. But you know, geopolitical flare ups, let's not

0:31:54.840 --> 0:31:57.080
<v Speaker 9>completely rule it out right. I mean, I know we

0:31:57.160 --> 0:32:00.440
<v Speaker 9>temporarily see some price wings following some of those layer ups.

0:32:00.440 --> 0:32:03.200
<v Speaker 9>We've seen that a lot this year. But you know,

0:32:03.240 --> 0:32:06.840
<v Speaker 9>I think there's always that sneaky potential for geopolitics to matter.

0:32:07.120 --> 0:32:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Hey, Lauren, earlier we were talking about a story that's

0:32:09.720 --> 0:32:12.200
<v Speaker 1>among the most read and about kind of private credits

0:32:12.200 --> 0:32:13.920
<v Speaker 1>problem that they've got a lot of money to work,

0:32:14.680 --> 0:32:17.480
<v Speaker 1>to put to work, and so they're have to do

0:32:17.720 --> 0:32:20.160
<v Speaker 1>some interesting deals maybe you know, take down the rates

0:32:20.200 --> 0:32:23.040
<v Speaker 1>in terms of when banks need to when companies need

0:32:23.080 --> 0:32:27.040
<v Speaker 1>to do a deal with them, they're getting lower rates,

0:32:27.080 --> 0:32:29.120
<v Speaker 1>which you know, obviously you think about in terms of

0:32:29.120 --> 0:32:31.960
<v Speaker 1>returns for investors. Having said that, you are part of

0:32:31.960 --> 0:32:34.720
<v Speaker 1>the b of a private bank. How many of your

0:32:34.880 --> 0:32:40.040
<v Speaker 1>clients are accessing private credit, are interested in doing private credit?

0:32:40.080 --> 0:32:43.120
<v Speaker 1>That the private medit markets are what they're really interested

0:32:43.120 --> 0:32:43.680
<v Speaker 1>in today.

0:32:47.080 --> 0:32:49.560
<v Speaker 9>A lot of focus actually has been devoted to this

0:32:49.640 --> 0:32:52.400
<v Speaker 9>private credit sleeve, I'll say, And you know, it speaks

0:32:52.400 --> 0:32:55.400
<v Speaker 9>a lot to clients here about this liquidity environment, right,

0:32:55.440 --> 0:32:58.480
<v Speaker 9>and so immediately that's sort of like the intriguing factor.

0:32:58.680 --> 0:33:01.280
<v Speaker 9>So private credit. Yeah, we are gonna have to do

0:33:01.360 --> 0:33:03.239
<v Speaker 9>more in this space sort of through your end. And

0:33:03.280 --> 0:33:05.880
<v Speaker 9>we're up against an election, so that's another consideration.

0:33:06.120 --> 0:33:09.720
<v Speaker 1>But I mean your private bank clients increasingly, you guys

0:33:09.840 --> 0:33:13.160
<v Speaker 1>putting investments for them into private credit.

0:33:15.040 --> 0:33:17.440
<v Speaker 9>Yes, And I think that's an industry change sort of

0:33:17.440 --> 0:33:19.400
<v Speaker 9>this year, right. I do think that we're sort of

0:33:19.440 --> 0:33:22.840
<v Speaker 9>adding towards that. Yeah, this is the year.

0:33:23.160 --> 0:33:24.920
<v Speaker 1>All right, Gonna leave it there, Hey, Lauren, thank you

0:33:25.000 --> 0:33:28.200
<v Speaker 1>so much. Lauren san Felipe. She's senior investment strategist for

0:33:28.360 --> 0:33:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Merrill and Bank, a private a Bank of America private

0:33:30.960 --> 0:33:34.040
<v Speaker 1>bank joining us here in New York City.

0:33:34.080 --> 0:33:38.719
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Business Week podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:33:38.840 --> 0:33:42.560
<v Speaker 2>and anywhere else you get your podcast. Listen live weekday

0:33:42.600 --> 0:33:46.160
<v Speaker 2>afternoons from two to five pm Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:33:46.240 --> 0:33:49.560
<v Speaker 2>the iHeartRadio app tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:33:49.600 --> 0:33:52.680
<v Speaker 2>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:33:52.800 --> 0:33:54.800
<v Speaker 2>and always on the Bloomberg terminal