WEBVTT - Is Elon’s Political Capital Spent?

0:00:02.480 --> 0:00:08.559
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. Let me tell you

0:00:08.560 --> 0:00:09.520
<v Speaker 1>we have a new star.

0:00:10.520 --> 0:00:14.680
<v Speaker 2>A star is born Elon mars Juthan Kennemy.

0:00:14.880 --> 0:00:18.520
<v Speaker 3>He is the Thomas Edison plus plus plus of our age.

0:00:18.640 --> 0:00:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Probably his whole life is from a position of insecurity.

0:00:21.079 --> 0:00:23.200
<v Speaker 1>I feel for the guy. I would say ninety eight

0:00:23.239 --> 0:00:26.560
<v Speaker 1>percent really appreciate what he does. But those two percent

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:29.840
<v Speaker 1>that are nasty, they are I'll pay in four post.

0:00:30.280 --> 0:00:32.280
<v Speaker 1>We were meant for great things in the United States

0:00:32.320 --> 0:00:36.400
<v Speaker 1>of America, and Elon reminds us of that we don't

0:00:36.440 --> 0:00:46.840
<v Speaker 1>have a fourth branch of governments called Elon Musk. Welcome

0:00:46.840 --> 0:00:50.680
<v Speaker 1>to Elon Ink, Bloomberg's weekly podcast about Elon Musk. It's Tuesday,

0:00:50.760 --> 0:00:55.520
<v Speaker 1>June third. I'm your host, David Papadopolis. So Elon got

0:00:55.560 --> 0:00:58.800
<v Speaker 1>his farewell from the President last week. Today it's about

0:00:59.320 --> 0:01:02.600
<v Speaker 1>a man named Elon and he's one of the greatest

0:01:02.600 --> 0:01:07.000
<v Speaker 1>business leaders and innovators the world has ever produced. And

0:01:07.040 --> 0:01:10.320
<v Speaker 1>he is now sort of kind of back with his

0:01:10.400 --> 0:01:14.440
<v Speaker 1>company's twenty four to seven so right on c Reports

0:01:14.440 --> 0:01:18.360
<v Speaker 1>emerged of him raising billions of dollars from investors, making

0:01:18.480 --> 0:01:22.640
<v Speaker 1>babies and apparently, according to the New York Times doing

0:01:22.800 --> 0:01:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Lots and lots of drugs. To talk about Elon's big

0:01:26.160 --> 0:01:28.039
<v Speaker 1>week back in business. I'm sitting here with two of

0:01:28.040 --> 0:01:31.600
<v Speaker 1>our stalwarts, Sarah Friar, team leader for Big Tech coverge

0:01:31.600 --> 0:01:36.440
<v Speaker 1>here at Bloomberg Sarah, Hello, Hello, And Max Chafkin BusinessWeek

0:01:36.560 --> 0:01:37.479
<v Speaker 1>superstar Max.

0:01:37.520 --> 0:01:39.520
<v Speaker 3>Hello, Hey, David, Hey Sarah.

0:01:39.680 --> 0:01:41.440
<v Speaker 1>Max. I saw the other day that your Mets are

0:01:41.480 --> 0:01:42.400
<v Speaker 1>winning baseball games.

0:01:42.440 --> 0:01:43.920
<v Speaker 3>Oh my god, I'm so happy.

0:01:44.440 --> 0:01:46.080
<v Speaker 1>That explains a smile.

0:01:46.200 --> 0:01:48.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, they're They're looking great.

0:01:48.200 --> 0:01:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Okay, nice, And you know, Elon may be leaving DC

0:01:53.240 --> 0:01:56.720
<v Speaker 1>behind Max, but the story keeps following him. Just one

0:01:56.800 --> 0:01:59.200
<v Speaker 1>day after that big sendoff in the Oval Office, Trump

0:01:59.360 --> 0:02:03.240
<v Speaker 1>abruptly pulled the NASA nomination. A Musk business associate and

0:02:03.280 --> 0:02:07.040
<v Speaker 1>close allied, Jared Isaacman to me, it is exhibit a

0:02:07.280 --> 0:02:10.360
<v Speaker 1>of the defeat of Elon Musk and Washington and illustrates

0:02:10.400 --> 0:02:13.960
<v Speaker 1>the greatly diminished state he's left it in. I suspect

0:02:14.160 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 1>I will get some pushback on this point though, from

0:02:16.560 --> 0:02:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Max and Sarah. We'll start, though, with the drug allegations,

0:02:20.560 --> 0:02:26.040
<v Speaker 1>the money and the babies. Max. The New York Times

0:02:26.120 --> 0:02:31.320
<v Speaker 1>splashed a big report last week on Elon's drug use,

0:02:31.440 --> 0:02:33.679
<v Speaker 1>including ketamine. Give us some of the details.

0:02:33.840 --> 0:02:36.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and we should say Elon Musk has now denied

0:02:36.840 --> 0:02:37.520
<v Speaker 2>this report.

0:02:38.040 --> 0:02:39.760
<v Speaker 1>Denied it repeatedly, repeatedly.

0:02:40.040 --> 0:02:42.280
<v Speaker 2>I think he said the Times is making stuff up.

0:02:42.680 --> 0:02:46.240
<v Speaker 2>The Times that stood by it. The report gives you

0:02:46.880 --> 0:02:52.239
<v Speaker 2>a portrait essentially of Musk's behavior over the last year

0:02:52.840 --> 0:02:57.880
<v Speaker 2>and connects it to what sources are describing to The

0:02:57.960 --> 0:03:01.919
<v Speaker 2>Times as fairly extensive drug use.

0:03:02.000 --> 0:03:03.920
<v Speaker 3>Now, we of course knew.

0:03:03.960 --> 0:03:07.400
<v Speaker 2>That Elon Musk has smoked pot. We know that he's

0:03:07.480 --> 0:03:08.359
<v Speaker 2>used ketamine.

0:03:08.880 --> 0:03:11.280
<v Speaker 1>The I mean, he's admitted to the ketamine use in

0:03:11.320 --> 0:03:11.720
<v Speaker 1>the past.

0:03:12.320 --> 0:03:14.959
<v Speaker 3>Yerescribed I think anyone.

0:03:15.040 --> 0:03:17.880
<v Speaker 2>They are parts of this report suggesting, for instance, he'd

0:03:17.960 --> 0:03:21.079
<v Speaker 2>use some party drugs on various occasions that I don't

0:03:21.080 --> 0:03:25.040
<v Speaker 2>think was super surprising. But the most significant thing in

0:03:25.080 --> 0:03:27.880
<v Speaker 2>this story on drug use is that Elon Musk was

0:03:27.960 --> 0:03:33.120
<v Speaker 2>telling associates that he had what sounds like a was

0:03:33.200 --> 0:03:36.640
<v Speaker 2>using ketamine pretty heavily, and that he was using, in

0:03:36.680 --> 0:03:40.560
<v Speaker 2>fact so heavily that he was experiencing some side effects,

0:03:40.600 --> 0:03:43.960
<v Speaker 2>including bladder proms, which is one of the one of

0:03:43.960 --> 0:03:47.640
<v Speaker 2>the common side effects from ketamine use. So that was

0:03:47.680 --> 0:03:50.600
<v Speaker 2>in the story But then the other thing that is

0:03:50.640 --> 0:03:55.040
<v Speaker 2>maybe more troubling was sort of a suggestion that his

0:03:55.240 --> 0:03:58.800
<v Speaker 2>behavior that he was sort of using ketamine, using these

0:03:58.920 --> 0:04:02.280
<v Speaker 2>drugs all trying to run his companies while trying to

0:04:02.320 --> 0:04:05.320
<v Speaker 2>run the US government, and that he was impaired. And

0:04:05.360 --> 0:04:07.960
<v Speaker 2>I'd say in that way, it was kind of the

0:04:08.000 --> 0:04:11.560
<v Speaker 2>most serious allegations that we've seen about his drug use

0:04:11.600 --> 0:04:11.960
<v Speaker 2>to date.

0:04:12.280 --> 0:04:14.440
<v Speaker 4>That said, there was not like, I don't know if

0:04:14.480 --> 0:04:16.200
<v Speaker 4>I missed it in the story, but there was not

0:04:16.240 --> 0:04:19.960
<v Speaker 4>like a specific instance of you know, we know Musk

0:04:20.120 --> 0:04:22.839
<v Speaker 4>was on drugs when he did this thing.

0:04:23.160 --> 0:04:25.680
<v Speaker 1>That's correct, Sarah, You are right. I mean, there's at

0:04:25.680 --> 0:04:28.039
<v Speaker 1>some point they put, you know, a couple of things

0:04:28.040 --> 0:04:31.520
<v Speaker 1>side by side, the drug use next to his odd

0:04:31.600 --> 0:04:35.000
<v Speaker 1>behavior at that campaign event in Pennsylvania, which he was

0:04:35.120 --> 0:04:37.480
<v Speaker 1>jumping around on stage, But at no point, you are right,

0:04:37.560 --> 0:04:40.720
<v Speaker 1>do they say in the story that he was acting

0:04:40.760 --> 0:04:42.520
<v Speaker 1>this way on this day because of drugs.

0:04:42.920 --> 0:04:45.120
<v Speaker 2>It's a portrait of a guy who seems to the

0:04:45.160 --> 0:04:47.560
<v Speaker 2>outside world to be out of control in a whole

0:04:47.600 --> 0:04:51.360
<v Speaker 2>bunch of ways, with reporting that suggests that the same

0:04:51.400 --> 0:04:55.960
<v Speaker 2>time he was behaving erratically, he was talking to people.

0:04:55.720 --> 0:04:58.480
<v Speaker 3>About using drugs. Fairly heavily.

0:04:58.680 --> 0:05:00.640
<v Speaker 2>Now we should say a lot of the these drugs

0:05:00.680 --> 0:05:03.920
<v Speaker 2>in the Time story are not illegal drugs, right Ketamine

0:05:03.960 --> 0:05:06.240
<v Speaker 2>Musk has said he's using under a prescription. Now, of

0:05:06.320 --> 0:05:08.520
<v Speaker 2>course you could have a prescription from ketamine and still

0:05:08.760 --> 0:05:12.720
<v Speaker 2>be abusing it. The Times mentions this daily pill box

0:05:14.200 --> 0:05:16.360
<v Speaker 2>containing some adderall. Now, of course a lot of people

0:05:16.400 --> 0:05:20.120
<v Speaker 2>take adderall to manage you know, adult ADHD or whatever.

0:05:20.480 --> 0:05:23.799
<v Speaker 2>So so none of this on its own, I think

0:05:24.279 --> 0:05:27.480
<v Speaker 2>would be that concerning if you're like an investor or

0:05:27.520 --> 0:05:29.800
<v Speaker 2>even a close friend of Elon Musk. But it's the

0:05:29.880 --> 0:05:34.440
<v Speaker 2>kind of just juxtaposition that that Sarah's bringing up that raises.

0:05:34.240 --> 0:05:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Question, And I think the piece says that there was

0:05:37.120 --> 0:05:40.880
<v Speaker 1>at some point this blurry line between what was medically

0:05:40.880 --> 0:05:43.400
<v Speaker 1>prescribed and what was just recreational use.

0:05:43.839 --> 0:05:45.919
<v Speaker 4>There was one one other note in the story that

0:05:45.960 --> 0:05:48.800
<v Speaker 4>I found really interesting, which is that SpaceX, as a

0:05:48.839 --> 0:05:54.520
<v Speaker 4>government contractor, has to run a drug free workplace, and

0:05:54.680 --> 0:05:58.960
<v Speaker 4>there was sourcing in the story that Musk is getting

0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:04.080
<v Speaker 4>heads up on those drug tests before they happen so

0:06:04.120 --> 0:06:06.120
<v Speaker 4>that he can more easily pass them. So that was

0:06:06.160 --> 0:06:09.760
<v Speaker 4>another detail besides the bladder detail. The twenty pills in

0:06:09.800 --> 0:06:16.359
<v Speaker 4>the pillbox detail that built a picture of ways in

0:06:16.440 --> 0:06:20.640
<v Speaker 4>which this is becoming more routine for him, more integrated

0:06:20.720 --> 0:06:24.560
<v Speaker 4>with his every day and like well known to his associates.

0:06:24.760 --> 0:06:26.160
<v Speaker 1>I just want to say on that point, the Times

0:06:26.200 --> 0:06:29.120
<v Speaker 1>did reach out to SpaceX and SpaceX did not respond.

0:06:29.320 --> 0:06:31.360
<v Speaker 1>When are the Times seeking comment?

0:06:31.440 --> 0:06:31.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:06:31.600 --> 0:06:33.880
<v Speaker 2>And I guess the other thing there is that fact

0:06:33.920 --> 0:06:37.160
<v Speaker 2>is important because Musk has repeatedly said that he's, you know,

0:06:37.360 --> 0:06:40.280
<v Speaker 2>drug tested continuously. He's tested clean continuously.

0:06:40.720 --> 0:06:43.719
<v Speaker 4>And Kristin grind who who authored this one of the

0:06:43.720 --> 0:06:46.279
<v Speaker 4>authors on this story. She also wrote the book on

0:06:46.360 --> 0:06:51.000
<v Speaker 4>Tony Shea, who, as as is well known now died

0:06:51.040 --> 0:06:55.400
<v Speaker 4>of an overdose and her book goes deeply into the

0:06:55.480 --> 0:07:01.880
<v Speaker 4>history of ketamine abuse by that CEO of zaz And

0:07:01.880 --> 0:07:05.720
<v Speaker 4>and his escalation into other drugs and how it how

0:07:05.720 --> 0:07:08.480
<v Speaker 4>it changed thinking and and so one thing I've learned

0:07:08.520 --> 0:07:14.320
<v Speaker 4>from from that is the side effects include a lot

0:07:14.400 --> 0:07:18.400
<v Speaker 4>of amnesia, a lot of of distortion of reality, a

0:07:18.400 --> 0:07:21.920
<v Speaker 4>lot of confusion over what has happened, a lot of

0:07:21.920 --> 0:07:27.640
<v Speaker 4>paranoia is common in ketamine abuse. So I think that

0:07:27.640 --> 0:07:32.960
<v Speaker 4>that maybe why there was a lot of juxtaposition with

0:07:32.960 --> 0:07:35.800
<v Speaker 4>with scenes in this story of Musk, you know, either

0:07:35.800 --> 0:07:40.600
<v Speaker 4>attacking people or concerned about his companies, or having different

0:07:40.680 --> 0:07:45.000
<v Speaker 4>versions of the same reality. And I think the most

0:07:45.000 --> 0:07:46.600
<v Speaker 4>striking thing to me that was news to me I

0:07:46.880 --> 0:07:49.520
<v Speaker 4>didn't I didn't hear about with Tony say, but the

0:07:49.560 --> 0:07:53.680
<v Speaker 4>bladder issues just seem so painful. And what I was

0:07:53.680 --> 0:07:57.000
<v Speaker 4>reading the medical literature on that looks like irreversible if

0:07:57.000 --> 0:07:59.080
<v Speaker 4>it gets to that point.

0:07:58.600 --> 0:08:00.320
<v Speaker 1>No, irreversible doesn't sound good.

0:08:00.680 --> 0:08:03.640
<v Speaker 2>There was a whole other dimension in this story that

0:08:03.640 --> 0:08:06.320
<v Speaker 2>that kind of pertains to this because it's again sort

0:08:06.360 --> 0:08:09.040
<v Speaker 2>of more behavior that seems kind of erratic. And it

0:08:09.080 --> 0:08:12.480
<v Speaker 2>was about Elon Musk's love life, right, about Musk saying

0:08:12.520 --> 0:08:13.960
<v Speaker 2>different things to different women.

0:08:14.080 --> 0:08:14.280
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:08:14.480 --> 0:08:17.400
<v Speaker 2>So Grimes believe for a time that she was in

0:08:17.440 --> 0:08:19.760
<v Speaker 2>a monogamous relationship with Elon Musk.

0:08:20.040 --> 0:08:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Mistake.

0:08:21.120 --> 0:08:25.720
<v Speaker 2>Ashley Sinclair also believed that she was in a monogamous

0:08:25.760 --> 0:08:28.280
<v Speaker 2>relationship with Elon Musk. According to her, we also got

0:08:28.320 --> 0:08:31.680
<v Speaker 2>some detail on the terms of the settlement.

0:08:31.360 --> 0:08:33.640
<v Speaker 1>At It was a lot of money her in order

0:08:33.679 --> 0:08:35.960
<v Speaker 1>to keep it sifteen million dollars up front and one

0:08:36.040 --> 0:08:39.240
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand dollars per month. According to documents that the

0:08:39.320 --> 0:08:43.520
<v Speaker 1>time says it saw and Ashley Saint Clair said, nograsias,

0:08:43.559 --> 0:08:45.920
<v Speaker 1>and she said, I will no, I will see you.

0:08:46.040 --> 0:08:47.719
<v Speaker 1>I believe in court. They are in court now.

0:08:47.960 --> 0:08:48.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:08:48.240 --> 0:08:50.880
<v Speaker 2>And one thing, I mean, look, this is kind of

0:08:50.920 --> 0:08:53.680
<v Speaker 2>a side alley or whatever. Maybe this is not the

0:08:53.720 --> 0:08:56.400
<v Speaker 2>most important thing in this story, but it really did

0:08:56.480 --> 0:08:59.920
<v Speaker 2>raise a question of how sincere he is in his

0:09:00.400 --> 0:09:04.760
<v Speaker 2>pro natalism versus is he just sort of out of control?

0:09:05.200 --> 0:09:07.680
<v Speaker 1>And so maybe some combo of the two, right.

0:09:07.600 --> 0:09:09.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, some combo of the two, right, because it is

0:09:09.640 --> 0:09:12.320
<v Speaker 2>not a portrait of somebody who is fully in control.

0:09:12.400 --> 0:09:15.840
<v Speaker 2>I will say there is a potential number fifteen in

0:09:15.920 --> 0:09:20.600
<v Speaker 2>this story, Sinclair saying that he told her that he

0:09:20.640 --> 0:09:23.880
<v Speaker 2>had fathered children all over the world, including one with

0:09:23.960 --> 0:09:27.959
<v Speaker 2>a Japanese FLT star, which would be a new baby,

0:09:28.280 --> 0:09:28.440
<v Speaker 2>and that.

0:09:28.480 --> 0:09:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Apparently he was or is just offering his sperm to

0:09:32.000 --> 0:09:35.360
<v Speaker 1>any woman out there that we knew. I thought we did.

0:09:36.240 --> 0:09:39.560
<v Speaker 4>I missed that in the journal story. I was in

0:09:39.600 --> 0:09:42.000
<v Speaker 4>there sperm to somebody via direct message.

0:09:42.280 --> 0:09:44.400
<v Speaker 1>I guess I suppose I had blocked that out of

0:09:44.400 --> 0:09:44.839
<v Speaker 1>my mind.

0:09:45.240 --> 0:09:48.199
<v Speaker 2>Now I went on a little bit of a rabbit

0:09:48.240 --> 0:09:51.000
<v Speaker 2>hole trying to find the Japanese pop star to see

0:09:51.000 --> 0:09:52.520
<v Speaker 2>if this had indeed happened.

0:09:52.559 --> 0:09:55.679
<v Speaker 1>Are there any did you fly to Tokyo for this?

0:09:55.840 --> 0:09:59.600
<v Speaker 3>No, this happened on the internet, but I.

0:09:59.080 --> 0:10:03.640
<v Speaker 2>Was not able to Finally, we should treat this as

0:10:03.760 --> 0:10:07.439
<v Speaker 2>an unconfirmed report until we received further confirmation.

0:10:07.480 --> 0:10:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Got it?

0:10:07.800 --> 0:10:08.280
<v Speaker 3>I wrote.

0:10:08.960 --> 0:10:10.920
<v Speaker 1>The last thing on this subject I will note is

0:10:10.960 --> 0:10:13.960
<v Speaker 1>The Times. Both in the story and then in their

0:10:14.640 --> 0:10:16.680
<v Speaker 1>podcast in which they talked about it, they kept using

0:10:16.720 --> 0:10:20.120
<v Speaker 1>the term brood, which a brood of kids, which to me,

0:10:20.240 --> 0:10:25.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean usually broods like an animals. And I don't

0:10:25.280 --> 0:10:27.800
<v Speaker 1>know that it was just struck me as odd. Max.

0:10:27.840 --> 0:10:30.480
<v Speaker 1>I guess they suppose they figured once you get to

0:10:30.480 --> 0:10:33.520
<v Speaker 1>a certain number, it's no longer just a conventional family

0:10:33.559 --> 0:10:34.240
<v Speaker 1>of this now.

0:10:34.720 --> 0:10:37.320
<v Speaker 2>When you there just isn't a lot of precedent for

0:10:37.440 --> 0:10:41.320
<v Speaker 2>having this many children, Like I think it's hard to

0:10:41.320 --> 0:10:42.760
<v Speaker 2>come up with. I don't know that we have a

0:10:42.880 --> 0:10:47.200
<v Speaker 2>term for a large amount of human children this low.

0:10:47.280 --> 0:10:49.280
<v Speaker 3>You know, this big was so apparently not. I think

0:10:49.320 --> 0:10:51.439
<v Speaker 3>The Times is you know, working, but.

0:10:51.400 --> 0:10:59.760
<v Speaker 1>They have Sarah Fryar other things that happened in the

0:10:59.840 --> 0:11:03.040
<v Speaker 1>last past few days. Elon Musk is raising a lot

0:11:03.080 --> 0:11:04.839
<v Speaker 1>of money. It would seem tell us about it.

0:11:05.440 --> 0:11:09.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so a few things are happening at once. Let

0:11:09.760 --> 0:11:13.360
<v Speaker 4>me pull up my list here. So there is the

0:11:14.120 --> 0:11:18.480
<v Speaker 4>five billion that he wants for Xai.

0:11:19.320 --> 0:11:22.040
<v Speaker 1>There is, by the way, five billion, to be clear,

0:11:22.160 --> 0:11:24.520
<v Speaker 1>five billion via the debt market, not in.

0:11:24.559 --> 0:11:26.559
<v Speaker 3>Ex the debt market exactly.

0:11:27.160 --> 0:11:30.680
<v Speaker 4>So that's debt for Xai, which is a which is

0:11:30.760 --> 0:11:35.920
<v Speaker 4>part of Xai Holdings, which is simultaneously in discussions to

0:11:36.000 --> 0:11:41.400
<v Speaker 4>raise twenty billion in equity. And then he separately had

0:11:41.720 --> 0:11:47.960
<v Speaker 4>a raise for Neuralink, his brain technology company. That that

0:11:48.080 --> 0:11:51.680
<v Speaker 4>was the six hundred and fifty million round. And he's also,

0:11:52.480 --> 0:11:55.440
<v Speaker 4>according to the Financial Time, selling three hundred million in

0:11:55.640 --> 0:12:01.040
<v Speaker 4>Xai stock through a secondary offering. So lots of lots

0:12:01.080 --> 0:12:04.760
<v Speaker 4>of capital raises happening at once for his companies. Maybe

0:12:04.800 --> 0:12:10.440
<v Speaker 4>trying to make the most of this return to his

0:12:10.640 --> 0:12:14.160
<v Speaker 4>corporate life in what he says will be a full

0:12:14.200 --> 0:12:18.760
<v Speaker 4>time manner and realizing that these companies that he needs

0:12:18.800 --> 0:12:20.320
<v Speaker 4>more money to do the things he wants to do.

0:12:20.800 --> 0:12:25.280
<v Speaker 2>Important to differentiate between what has been announced, which is

0:12:25.360 --> 0:12:30.800
<v Speaker 2>the right and these Xai numbers, which according to.

0:12:30.800 --> 0:12:32.640
<v Speaker 1>The reports are still in marketing stage.

0:12:32.760 --> 0:12:34.360
<v Speaker 3>They're they're just asking for it.

0:12:34.400 --> 0:12:37.000
<v Speaker 1>So like yeah, like you're asking for.

0:12:36.920 --> 0:12:41.000
<v Speaker 2>It also like five billion dollars, but it doesn't necessarily mean.

0:12:40.800 --> 0:12:42.440
<v Speaker 1>That I'm going to can I tell you something? Though

0:12:42.800 --> 0:12:46.679
<v Speaker 1>much more likely to do usive billion than Max Schafflin. Yeah,

0:12:46.679 --> 0:12:47.800
<v Speaker 1>I'll give you now when you.

0:12:47.760 --> 0:12:51.079
<v Speaker 3>Dang GPUs do you need that so many?

0:12:51.679 --> 0:12:53.839
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, when you dangle an interest rate of over ten

0:12:53.880 --> 0:12:56.240
<v Speaker 1>percent on the debt, that certainly helps. And apparently the

0:12:56.320 --> 0:12:59.720
<v Speaker 1>interest rate they're offering you somewhere around twelve Morgan Stanley

0:13:00.200 --> 0:13:03.240
<v Speaker 1>time bank to mister Musk is handling the deal. I

0:13:03.280 --> 0:13:05.920
<v Speaker 1>will say, Max, you know, it's funny because Morgan Stanley

0:13:06.000 --> 0:13:09.080
<v Speaker 1>the other banks just finally finally got that godfor's sake,

0:13:09.120 --> 0:13:11.680
<v Speaker 1>and Twitter dead off its books. Twitter now of course

0:13:12.000 --> 0:13:14.080
<v Speaker 1>x which is now of course part of Xai. And

0:13:14.120 --> 0:13:15.840
<v Speaker 1>as soon as they finally managed to get it off

0:13:15.880 --> 0:13:19.520
<v Speaker 1>their books after they were nursing it forever and couldn't

0:13:19.600 --> 0:13:22.640
<v Speaker 1>pawn it off on anybody, bang, we hit the market

0:13:22.679 --> 0:13:23.600
<v Speaker 1>with another five billion.

0:13:23.720 --> 0:13:26.920
<v Speaker 2>I mean, like, if you're a banker, working with Elon

0:13:27.000 --> 0:13:29.800
<v Speaker 2>Musk is a good bet, even if you're not necessarily

0:13:29.840 --> 0:13:32.040
<v Speaker 2>crazy about any particular deal.

0:13:32.320 --> 0:13:34.520
<v Speaker 3>Like he's got a lot of private equity to sell.

0:13:34.520 --> 0:13:37.160
<v Speaker 1>All right, Max. Last thing in this space another deal

0:13:37.200 --> 0:13:40.319
<v Speaker 1>that happened or almost happened, kind of happened then didn't happen,

0:13:40.400 --> 0:13:43.000
<v Speaker 1>is Groc and Telegram. This is the.

0:13:42.960 --> 0:13:43.760
<v Speaker 3>Second one of these.

0:13:43.800 --> 0:13:48.400
<v Speaker 2>So the Telegram CEO tweeted or East or whatever about

0:13:48.679 --> 0:13:51.559
<v Speaker 2>a big deal with Groc that they were going to

0:13:51.640 --> 0:13:57.440
<v Speaker 2>integrate Grock into into Telegram or something, and a bunch

0:13:57.440 --> 0:13:58.880
<v Speaker 2>of news outlets wrote about it.

0:13:59.559 --> 0:14:01.280
<v Speaker 3>This is pretty similar to the story we.

0:14:01.200 --> 0:14:04.120
<v Speaker 2>Talked about two weeks ago about Calshi announcing a deal

0:14:04.520 --> 0:14:07.400
<v Speaker 2>and then Elon Musk showed up on Twitter and said

0:14:07.440 --> 0:14:10.480
<v Speaker 2>no deal has been signed. This kind of like weird

0:14:11.320 --> 0:14:14.800
<v Speaker 2>public feuding with a potential partner. This is a potentially

0:14:15.120 --> 0:14:19.200
<v Speaker 2>a large deal now. Look, Telegram, unlike Calshi, is a

0:14:19.360 --> 0:14:23.640
<v Speaker 2>very controversial business. The founder, Pavel d'urrov I believe, is

0:14:23.680 --> 0:14:27.280
<v Speaker 2>not an uncomplicated guy. There are regulators around the world

0:14:27.320 --> 0:14:31.560
<v Speaker 2>who have problems with the way Telegram handles like illegal

0:14:31.640 --> 0:14:34.440
<v Speaker 2>content in going through its service. Look, we don't know

0:14:34.440 --> 0:14:37.200
<v Speaker 2>the backstory, so who knows, But like, looking at this

0:14:37.280 --> 0:14:39.800
<v Speaker 2>report in light of what we read in the Times.

0:14:40.000 --> 0:14:43.160
<v Speaker 3>Like it just it does seem it seems odd right.

0:14:43.120 --> 0:14:46.400
<v Speaker 4>Well, also just for us to reply publicly on X

0:14:46.400 --> 0:14:49.920
<v Speaker 4>saying nothing is signed, and then for Pavel d'ov to

0:14:50.000 --> 0:14:53.600
<v Speaker 4>reply to that saying, correct, we're just in late stage

0:14:53.600 --> 0:14:57.320
<v Speaker 4>discussions Like those weren't his exact words, but he was

0:14:57.400 --> 0:15:02.040
<v Speaker 4>like trying to keep the relationship it proceeding ahead with

0:15:02.120 --> 0:15:06.520
<v Speaker 4>a steal, as opposed to taking Musk's very pointed statement

0:15:06.560 --> 0:15:08.040
<v Speaker 4>that nothing was happening.

0:15:08.480 --> 0:15:10.480
<v Speaker 3>I'll tell you what I think is going on here.

0:15:10.520 --> 0:15:13.600
<v Speaker 2>Please do But and this is just speculation, but you know,

0:15:13.880 --> 0:15:16.040
<v Speaker 2>Elon Musk, that's what this show is.

0:15:16.120 --> 0:15:17.680
<v Speaker 3>Max, He's a famous I got it, you know.

0:15:17.840 --> 0:15:21.720
<v Speaker 2>Just remember he's a famously hands on ceo his empire,

0:15:22.240 --> 0:15:26.160
<v Speaker 2>especially now, especially with his kind of political engagement, which

0:15:26.200 --> 0:15:29.320
<v Speaker 2>continues even with this White House event, and he's running

0:15:29.360 --> 0:15:31.840
<v Speaker 2>more companies than he's ever run. Like, I think it's

0:15:31.920 --> 0:15:35.960
<v Speaker 2>just gotten harder for all of these companies, especially these startups.

0:15:35.960 --> 0:15:38.920
<v Speaker 2>You know, Grok is sort of like a startup to operate,

0:15:38.960 --> 0:15:41.880
<v Speaker 2>they need Elon musk sign off for everything. And and

0:15:42.000 --> 0:15:44.240
<v Speaker 2>my supposition is some of these deals that are being

0:15:44.280 --> 0:15:46.160
<v Speaker 2>announced have been announced without.

0:15:46.720 --> 0:15:50.320
<v Speaker 1>The underlings are getting out over their skis anything you

0:15:50.320 --> 0:15:52.440
<v Speaker 1>didn't consult with the doge father first?

0:15:52.520 --> 0:15:55.480
<v Speaker 4>Exactly right, okay, or he made the deals and he's

0:15:55.480 --> 0:15:58.080
<v Speaker 4>forgetting possible as well.

0:15:58.720 --> 0:16:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Possible does father the dose father, like all fathers, tend

0:16:03.400 --> 0:16:05.560
<v Speaker 1>to forget a lot of that they do. And say,

0:16:11.320 --> 0:16:14.600
<v Speaker 1>moving back to Washington for a second, Max, because over

0:16:14.600 --> 0:16:18.720
<v Speaker 1>the weekend, just when you think Elon is leaving Washington

0:16:18.760 --> 0:16:22.640
<v Speaker 1>and he's closing that chapter of his life, bang, big

0:16:22.720 --> 0:16:27.360
<v Speaker 1>explosion reports start coming out. I believe it was initially

0:16:27.520 --> 0:16:31.800
<v Speaker 1>reported anonymously with sources, then confirmed by the White House

0:16:31.840 --> 0:16:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Trump truth that did it start with the truth.

0:16:35.160 --> 0:16:38.880
<v Speaker 3>There was a reporter Trump on Saturday.

0:16:38.760 --> 0:16:43.640
<v Speaker 1>That Musk Skuy Jared Isaac Man, close business associate has

0:16:43.680 --> 0:16:48.400
<v Speaker 1>been up in SpaceX, you know, traveling across across space.

0:16:48.600 --> 0:16:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Someone who's in put a lot of money into SpaceX.

0:16:50.720 --> 0:16:55.240
<v Speaker 1>I believe, was suddenly out as Trump's pick to lead NASA.

0:16:55.720 --> 0:16:58.320
<v Speaker 1>That's quite a parting gift, Max, on your way out

0:16:58.360 --> 0:16:58.760
<v Speaker 1>the door.

0:16:58.720 --> 0:17:01.120
<v Speaker 3>Well, it's not a parting gift.

0:17:01.280 --> 0:17:05.639
<v Speaker 2>Like to stop this, Like, first of all, Trump said,

0:17:05.880 --> 0:17:09.879
<v Speaker 2>Elon's sticking around. Elon said, Elon sticking around. We know

0:17:10.280 --> 0:17:13.640
<v Speaker 2>there's tons of lobbying going on. Elon is lobbying for

0:17:13.920 --> 0:17:17.639
<v Speaker 2>transportation rules around driverless cars. He's lobbying right now for

0:17:17.720 --> 0:17:20.639
<v Speaker 2>the Senate to change the big beautiful bill to to

0:17:21.080 --> 0:17:24.640
<v Speaker 2>keep these EV credits in place. This is an ongoing

0:17:24.720 --> 0:17:29.600
<v Speaker 2>negotiation with two with allies, but allies in Elon Musk

0:17:29.640 --> 0:17:32.800
<v Speaker 2>and Donald Trump, who have somewhat different interests. I would

0:17:32.840 --> 0:17:36.480
<v Speaker 2>say that beyond any kind of like anonymous report that

0:17:36.520 --> 0:17:38.840
<v Speaker 2>we've seen out of Trump world, beyond anything that like

0:17:39.160 --> 0:17:42.680
<v Speaker 2>Steve Bannon or any of the other kind of adversaries

0:17:42.680 --> 0:17:46.439
<v Speaker 2>that Elon has connected to Trump have said, this is

0:17:46.480 --> 0:17:47.280
<v Speaker 2>the single.

0:17:47.000 --> 0:17:48.040
<v Speaker 3>Most significant thing.

0:17:48.240 --> 0:17:51.359
<v Speaker 2>This is the like the one the biggest thing that

0:17:51.400 --> 0:17:54.399
<v Speaker 2>has happened to get you to say, huh, I wonder

0:17:54.440 --> 0:17:58.159
<v Speaker 2>if Elon Musk and Trump are good because this was

0:17:58.240 --> 0:18:02.320
<v Speaker 2>like Elon's guy, as you said, he had also cleared

0:18:02.520 --> 0:18:05.639
<v Speaker 2>his committee hearing, right, he was going to get confirmed.

0:18:06.000 --> 0:18:08.120
<v Speaker 3>And the explanation, yeah.

0:18:08.000 --> 0:18:12.200
<v Speaker 4>The replacement CEO for himself at his company exactly.

0:18:12.240 --> 0:18:15.200
<v Speaker 3>And the explanation is kind of thin.

0:18:15.520 --> 0:18:18.040
<v Speaker 2>The explanation is that Trump found out that he had

0:18:18.040 --> 0:18:22.320
<v Speaker 2>made donations to Democratic politicians, which, of course, like that's

0:18:22.320 --> 0:18:27.000
<v Speaker 2>a public record. There's also reporting to suggest that that

0:18:27.040 --> 0:18:29.800
<v Speaker 2>Trump had already known about this, that said, like, I

0:18:29.840 --> 0:18:32.880
<v Speaker 2>don't know that we know the whole story here.

0:18:33.080 --> 0:18:35.639
<v Speaker 4>Max, I think I'm curious what you think of just

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:39.040
<v Speaker 4>like sometimes I think when with Trump, the simplest answer

0:18:39.160 --> 0:18:42.560
<v Speaker 4>is sometimes the right one. And I have seen no

0:18:42.720 --> 0:18:45.080
<v Speaker 4>reporting to back me up on this.

0:18:45.280 --> 0:18:47.920
<v Speaker 3>You think he just forgot no, no, no, no no.

0:18:47.960 --> 0:18:51.840
<v Speaker 4>I think that that Trump was on the campaign trail

0:18:51.960 --> 0:18:55.560
<v Speaker 4>talking about Elon Musk's big, beautiful rockets that are going

0:18:55.640 --> 0:18:59.080
<v Speaker 4>to take us to Mars. I think that he really

0:18:59.119 --> 0:19:03.960
<v Speaker 4>believed in that idea, and the rockets have been exploding

0:19:04.160 --> 0:19:06.760
<v Speaker 4>on the launch pad. And so if I'm Trump, I'm

0:19:06.800 --> 0:19:09.560
<v Speaker 4>looking at that and thinking, you know, do we really

0:19:09.600 --> 0:19:13.199
<v Speaker 4>want to be all in on this direction? It's just

0:19:13.280 --> 0:19:15.920
<v Speaker 4>it's just, you know, symbolism to Trump matters.

0:19:15.720 --> 0:19:20.760
<v Speaker 1>A lot our listeners. Another one did blow up last week. Actually,

0:19:20.760 --> 0:19:21.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't rely reminder.

0:19:22.440 --> 0:19:24.880
<v Speaker 4>We forget anything to do with this.

0:19:24.880 --> 0:19:27.760
<v Speaker 1>This is the This is how many now in what

0:19:27.920 --> 0:19:28.880
<v Speaker 1>period of time, like.

0:19:29.000 --> 0:19:32.640
<v Speaker 3>Three in a row, where they've had mishaps.

0:19:32.880 --> 0:19:34.880
<v Speaker 1>And they're not going to just argue that, Hey, we're

0:19:34.920 --> 0:19:37.440
<v Speaker 1>just iterating these kind of explosions are all part of

0:19:37.480 --> 0:19:40.760
<v Speaker 1>the learning process. Don't sweat at Chafkin. We're going there.

0:19:41.000 --> 0:19:42.359
<v Speaker 3>They are arguing that, and they.

0:19:42.280 --> 0:19:45.359
<v Speaker 4>Are that they're also exploding billions of dollars into Sinaire.

0:19:45.840 --> 0:19:47.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and it's like Sarah saying, Trump would be on

0:19:47.800 --> 0:19:50.119
<v Speaker 2>the campaign trail and he had this bit that people

0:19:50.160 --> 0:19:54.080
<v Speaker 2>probably remember where we talked about the arms grabbing the rockets.

0:19:54.080 --> 0:19:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Like a baby.

0:19:55.080 --> 0:19:57.040
<v Speaker 2>He did a little version of it actually in the

0:19:57.040 --> 0:19:59.880
<v Speaker 2>Oval office the other day during Elon's you know, farewell

0:19:59.880 --> 0:20:03.560
<v Speaker 2>at and so, you know, whatever the argument is about,

0:20:03.640 --> 0:20:05.440
<v Speaker 2>like oh, this was just a test launch or whatever,

0:20:05.480 --> 0:20:08.880
<v Speaker 2>we did not get the beautiful arms, you know, cuddling

0:20:08.920 --> 0:20:11.600
<v Speaker 2>the rocket like a baby or whatever Trump might have

0:20:11.720 --> 0:20:15.040
<v Speaker 2>liked to see. And on top of that, you have pushback,

0:20:15.160 --> 0:20:18.199
<v Speaker 2>right of like you have you have senators, you have

0:20:18.320 --> 0:20:20.879
<v Speaker 2>NASA folks, you have people who don't necessarily want to

0:20:20.960 --> 0:20:24.639
<v Speaker 2>just like take a hard pivot with NASA, which is

0:20:24.680 --> 0:20:27.000
<v Speaker 2>the what Jared Isaacman and Elon Muska want to do.

0:20:27.440 --> 0:20:31.520
<v Speaker 2>I also do think it's possible that like Trump just

0:20:31.600 --> 0:20:35.440
<v Speaker 2>kind of forgot about Jared Isaacman's donations to Democrats, or

0:20:35.520 --> 0:20:38.160
<v Speaker 2>he kind of spaced when someone was telling him or

0:20:38.280 --> 0:20:41.800
<v Speaker 2>or someone convinced him that actually, like this is a

0:20:41.920 --> 0:20:43.680
<v Speaker 2>this is a big issue. I mean, these were very

0:20:43.720 --> 0:20:46.520
<v Speaker 2>recent donations. I mean as recent as the twenty twenty

0:20:46.520 --> 0:20:50.080
<v Speaker 2>four election. It's not like he was a Democrat twenty

0:20:50.160 --> 0:20:53.720
<v Speaker 2>years ago. And no fair, fair, but I think it's

0:20:53.720 --> 0:20:57.000
<v Speaker 2>possible that the like face value explanation offered from Donald

0:20:57.000 --> 0:20:57.840
<v Speaker 2>Trump is true.

0:20:57.960 --> 0:21:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I will just say in counterpoint here, hearing all

0:21:01.640 --> 0:21:05.159
<v Speaker 1>that and appreciating all that and seeing your points of view,

0:21:05.240 --> 0:21:07.760
<v Speaker 1>I will say that Musk himself was quoted in this

0:21:08.080 --> 0:21:10.160
<v Speaker 1>very good Atlantic piece. And by the way, this Atlantic

0:21:10.200 --> 0:21:12.080
<v Speaker 1>piece are just simply pulling in this case here from

0:21:12.080 --> 0:21:14.679
<v Speaker 1>an old pressure he gave. He said, this whole doze

0:21:14.680 --> 0:21:16.720
<v Speaker 1>thing I'm doing, this is a way to make a

0:21:16.760 --> 0:21:20.159
<v Speaker 1>lot of enemies and not that many friends. And I

0:21:20.280 --> 0:21:23.159
<v Speaker 1>think it's also possible that some of those enemies, and

0:21:23.200 --> 0:21:26.760
<v Speaker 1>it is a big, big, big list of enemies he

0:21:26.760 --> 0:21:29.840
<v Speaker 1>has made in Washington, d C. It's distinctly possible that

0:21:29.880 --> 0:21:32.080
<v Speaker 1>more and more and more of them are around the

0:21:32.119 --> 0:21:35.240
<v Speaker 1>president and in his year saying hey, let's sandbag these

0:21:35.320 --> 0:21:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Musk initiatives. Not in so many words, that's not how

0:21:37.600 --> 0:21:39.520
<v Speaker 1>they present it to Trump. I mean, I would say,

0:21:39.520 --> 0:21:42.879
<v Speaker 1>when I think about how Washington, d C in some

0:21:43.040 --> 0:21:48.040
<v Speaker 1>ways really roughed up elon Musk and the amount of

0:21:48.720 --> 0:21:51.399
<v Speaker 1>enemies he made there. There is a very good piece

0:21:51.440 --> 0:21:54.719
<v Speaker 1>that The Atlantic ran recently in which the opening scene

0:21:55.320 --> 0:21:58.919
<v Speaker 1>is Scott Besson, the Secretary of the Treasury, in a

0:21:59.000 --> 0:22:02.920
<v Speaker 1>fight with Musk. Also, by the way, about a pick

0:22:02.960 --> 0:22:05.359
<v Speaker 1>in this case, who's going to run the IRS? And

0:22:05.400 --> 0:22:09.440
<v Speaker 1>to be clear, Musk also was defeated there. Bessen ultimately

0:22:09.480 --> 0:22:12.160
<v Speaker 1>got his guy to head the IRS, and Musk guy

0:22:12.480 --> 0:22:16.320
<v Speaker 1>out was ousted. The story opens with Bessn't shouting at

0:22:16.320 --> 0:22:20.679
<v Speaker 1>the top of his lungs at Musk, g you, this

0:22:20.720 --> 0:22:24.400
<v Speaker 1>is all happening right outside the Oval office, and it's

0:22:24.440 --> 0:22:27.320
<v Speaker 1>going up and down the quarters of the White House.

0:22:28.119 --> 0:22:30.440
<v Speaker 1>At what point, according to the piece, the two men

0:22:30.640 --> 0:22:35.800
<v Speaker 1>are their faces are just inches apart. And this, apparently,

0:22:36.800 --> 0:22:39.280
<v Speaker 1>according to this piece and according to reporting we've done

0:22:39.280 --> 0:22:42.120
<v Speaker 1>and others have done, is a window into I would argue, Max,

0:22:42.200 --> 0:22:45.720
<v Speaker 1>the animosity that has been building there against us. Another

0:22:45.760 --> 0:22:48.040
<v Speaker 1>interesting thing that the piece points out is, you remember

0:22:48.080 --> 0:22:50.600
<v Speaker 1>that thing that Musk and the Doose team were demanding

0:22:50.600 --> 0:22:52.760
<v Speaker 1>that bureaucrats do, where they had to like send a

0:22:52.760 --> 0:22:56.399
<v Speaker 1>weekly email saying, hey, here's the three yeah, here the

0:22:56.400 --> 0:22:59.560
<v Speaker 1>three things we've done this week. Apparently everybody who was

0:22:59.600 --> 0:23:03.360
<v Speaker 1>just ignored it, and the Atlantic, as someone quoted anonymously

0:23:03.440 --> 0:23:06.920
<v Speaker 1>saying somebody close to Trump saying how many people were

0:23:06.960 --> 0:23:09.240
<v Speaker 1>fired because they didn't send in their three things a

0:23:09.240 --> 0:23:12.600
<v Speaker 1>week or whatever the it was. I think that everyone

0:23:12.640 --> 0:23:14.840
<v Speaker 1>is ready to move on from this part of the administration.

0:23:15.080 --> 0:23:18.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Look, there has been this has existed from the

0:23:18.520 --> 0:23:22.320
<v Speaker 2>moment elon Musk like not to Washington, right, there has

0:23:22.359 --> 0:23:26.320
<v Speaker 2>been a lot of skepticism from others in Trump world

0:23:26.960 --> 0:23:29.399
<v Speaker 2>about whether he really knew what he was doing. You know,

0:23:29.440 --> 0:23:32.760
<v Speaker 2>there's lots of questions, right, his connections to China. This

0:23:32.840 --> 0:23:36.119
<v Speaker 2>is like he's had adversaries all along. And I think

0:23:36.160 --> 0:23:40.480
<v Speaker 2>you're right that as he's become more politically unpopular, as

0:23:40.520 --> 0:23:41.720
<v Speaker 2>it became clear, yes.

0:23:41.520 --> 0:23:44.479
<v Speaker 1>And his popularity, his approval ratings have been sinking.

0:23:44.560 --> 0:23:46.600
<v Speaker 3>Joge is not good for the Trump administration.

0:23:46.720 --> 0:23:50.680
<v Speaker 2>Like if the goal is just like maximizing for approval

0:23:50.760 --> 0:23:52.840
<v Speaker 2>numbers or whatever, they would be running away from this

0:23:52.960 --> 0:23:54.560
<v Speaker 2>as fast as they can, which I guess to somebody

0:23:54.600 --> 0:23:55.439
<v Speaker 2>sent they.

0:23:55.320 --> 0:23:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Are now Sarah. He has been interestingly, Musk been doing

0:24:00.040 --> 0:24:02.639
<v Speaker 1>suddenly lots and lots of interviews with the legacy media

0:24:02.800 --> 0:24:06.480
<v Speaker 1>and super keen to talk about space and super keen

0:24:06.800 --> 0:24:09.399
<v Speaker 1>not to talk about politics. Let's listen to a recent

0:24:09.440 --> 0:24:12.520
<v Speaker 1>interview he did with CBS wondering what your thought is

0:24:12.600 --> 0:24:16.320
<v Speaker 1>on the ban on foreign students the proposal. I mean

0:24:16.320 --> 0:24:20.560
<v Speaker 1>you were one of those kids, right, Yeah, I.

0:24:20.480 --> 0:24:22.200
<v Speaker 4>Mean I think we want to stick to, you know,

0:24:22.840 --> 0:24:26.080
<v Speaker 4>the subject of the day, which is like spaceships as

0:24:26.080 --> 0:24:28.840
<v Speaker 4>opposed to you know, presidential policy.

0:24:29.440 --> 0:24:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Oh okay, I was sold anything is good.

0:24:33.240 --> 0:24:40.119
<v Speaker 2>But no, well no, it's funny hearing somebody discover in

0:24:40.160 --> 0:24:40.720
<v Speaker 2>real time.

0:24:41.119 --> 0:24:43.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you must sometimes changes his mind.

0:24:44.000 --> 0:24:46.719
<v Speaker 1>No, any event, Sarah, the it feels a little bit

0:24:46.800 --> 0:24:52.199
<v Speaker 1>like the rebrand and after you know, Tesla and in general,

0:24:52.400 --> 0:24:55.040
<v Speaker 1>the Musk brand was damaged quite a bit during his

0:24:55.119 --> 0:24:57.680
<v Speaker 1>time in Washington. Perhaps the rebranding and.

0:24:58.320 --> 0:25:00.639
<v Speaker 3>Is a foot Yeah, I think it is.

0:25:00.680 --> 0:25:04.000
<v Speaker 4>I mean I think you saw Tesla stocks or after

0:25:05.200 --> 0:25:10.080
<v Speaker 4>he declared that he was done with Washington. However true

0:25:10.200 --> 0:25:12.320
<v Speaker 4>or not that will turn out to be. I think

0:25:12.400 --> 0:25:16.840
<v Speaker 4>investors are looking forward to this. They see Musk really

0:25:16.920 --> 0:25:21.200
<v Speaker 4>driven to prove everyone wrong, that he can turn around

0:25:21.240 --> 0:25:24.359
<v Speaker 4>his companies and get driver lists, taxis on the road

0:25:24.560 --> 0:25:28.880
<v Speaker 4>and get to Mars and build out the Colossus Data

0:25:28.920 --> 0:25:33.240
<v Speaker 4>Center in Memphis. I think that there's like so many

0:25:33.320 --> 0:25:38.560
<v Speaker 4>plates he's spinning with really big, high stakes things that

0:25:38.640 --> 0:25:41.240
<v Speaker 4>need to be accomplished. Neuralink is having a big year,

0:25:41.400 --> 0:25:44.680
<v Speaker 4>as we've discussed, and wanting to put their chips and

0:25:44.720 --> 0:25:48.440
<v Speaker 4>dozens of people. So it is kind of a crucial

0:25:48.560 --> 0:25:52.719
<v Speaker 4>time at all of these businesses. But they all still

0:25:52.840 --> 0:25:57.320
<v Speaker 4>need Washington's backing, like every single one of them. Neuralink

0:25:57.400 --> 0:26:00.920
<v Speaker 4>needs the FDA. The driver his cars need a ton

0:26:00.960 --> 0:26:04.560
<v Speaker 4>of government approval spasics. As we've talked about, this is

0:26:04.600 --> 0:26:08.400
<v Speaker 4>not going to be a clean break. And if Trump

0:26:09.480 --> 0:26:13.960
<v Speaker 4>truly is disillusioned with Musk and ready to put him aside,

0:26:13.960 --> 0:26:16.560
<v Speaker 4>which it doesn't look like that's you know, he still

0:26:16.600 --> 0:26:19.480
<v Speaker 4>has really nice things to say about him. They had

0:26:19.520 --> 0:26:20.240
<v Speaker 4>dinner recently.

0:26:20.480 --> 0:26:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Well, Sarah, he certainly likes he certainly likes Musk's money.

0:26:24.160 --> 0:26:26.360
<v Speaker 1>I would say that, so, I mean I would.

0:26:26.359 --> 0:26:29.119
<v Speaker 4>But but it turns out there was that detail in

0:26:29.119 --> 0:26:31.800
<v Speaker 4>that Whilester's journal story that the hundred million that he's

0:26:31.920 --> 0:26:34.800
<v Speaker 4>committed to Trump's pack hasn't.

0:26:34.520 --> 0:26:38.240
<v Speaker 1>Come a little bit like the derived Wait a minute,

0:26:38.240 --> 0:26:41.160
<v Speaker 1>it's just like the Calshi deal and the groc telegram deal.

0:26:41.359 --> 0:26:44.359
<v Speaker 3>I think, I mean, I like, I think I might

0:26:44.400 --> 0:26:45.240
<v Speaker 3>have said this last week.

0:26:45.280 --> 0:26:48.120
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I think they are negotiating in public, and

0:26:48.200 --> 0:26:51.359
<v Speaker 2>like Trump and Musk, Trump and Musk over you know,

0:26:51.600 --> 0:26:56.159
<v Speaker 2>various asks that Musk has which are going to be,

0:26:57.040 --> 0:27:00.240
<v Speaker 2>you know, not necessarily easy for Trump to deliver, which

0:27:00.240 --> 0:27:02.879
<v Speaker 2>is why he hasn't delivered them yet. And Musk, of course,

0:27:03.080 --> 0:27:05.920
<v Speaker 2>is has this has a really important point of leverage

0:27:06.240 --> 0:27:08.960
<v Speaker 2>over Trump, as you mentioned, David, which is that he

0:27:09.000 --> 0:27:13.680
<v Speaker 2>can conceivably give hundreds of millions of dollars to Trump's pack,

0:27:14.040 --> 0:27:17.560
<v Speaker 2>or to midterm candidates, or to jd Vance, or to anyone.

0:27:17.640 --> 0:27:20.080
<v Speaker 2>And I think that's why you heard him in that

0:27:20.200 --> 0:27:23.520
<v Speaker 2>excellent Bloomberg interview that we talked about a couple weeks ago, saying,

0:27:24.200 --> 0:27:26.359
<v Speaker 2>I don't you know, I would give if I saw

0:27:26.400 --> 0:27:28.439
<v Speaker 2>a need, but I don't see a need yet. Like

0:27:28.480 --> 0:27:30.520
<v Speaker 2>it was very much the kind of thing you would say, me,

0:27:30.760 --> 0:27:33.080
<v Speaker 2>make me see it, agotiating, make me.

0:27:33.040 --> 0:27:40.639
<v Speaker 1>See that need, Help me see that need. Talk to me. Okay, Max, So,

0:27:40.720 --> 0:27:42.960
<v Speaker 1>by the magic of editing, you and I were back

0:27:42.960 --> 0:27:45.800
<v Speaker 1>here in the studio again, Pal, how you're doing. So

0:27:45.960 --> 0:27:52.119
<v Speaker 1>we're here because Musk, shortly after we finished taping, went

0:27:52.160 --> 0:27:55.159
<v Speaker 1>on a bit of a rant, an ex rant, max

0:27:55.720 --> 0:28:00.560
<v Speaker 1>ripping the big beautiful bill that Donald Trump is pushing

0:28:00.560 --> 0:28:01.840
<v Speaker 1>through Congress. Man.

0:28:01.920 --> 0:28:05.639
<v Speaker 2>It was hot, yeah, and he had criticized it to

0:28:05.680 --> 0:28:09.879
<v Speaker 2>some extent earlier. Trump had even addressed that criticism during

0:28:09.920 --> 0:28:12.600
<v Speaker 2>their press conference, but this took things up a notch.

0:28:12.640 --> 0:28:15.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna read from the Ekes that was posted at

0:28:16.119 --> 0:28:20.240
<v Speaker 2>one thirty pm. As you said after we finished recording,

0:28:20.600 --> 0:28:25.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. This massive,

0:28:25.800 --> 0:28:32.040
<v Speaker 2>outrageous Porkfield Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame

0:28:32.160 --> 0:28:35.840
<v Speaker 2>on those who voted for it. You know you did wrong.

0:28:36.240 --> 0:28:38.800
<v Speaker 3>You'd know it, I mean know it harsh.

0:28:39.040 --> 0:28:45.200
<v Speaker 2>I will say, not criticizing the president there, criticizing Republican

0:28:45.800 --> 0:28:46.640
<v Speaker 2>congress people.

0:28:46.760 --> 0:28:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Yes, But if Trump calls it a big beautiful bill

0:28:50.240 --> 0:28:53.400
<v Speaker 1>and Musk calls it a disgusting abomination, man, that puts

0:28:53.480 --> 0:28:55.160
<v Speaker 1>him at pretty opposite end of the spectrum. And I

0:28:55.240 --> 0:28:59.280
<v Speaker 1>also point out the very beginning, as you read so beautifully,

0:28:59.320 --> 0:29:03.480
<v Speaker 1>maxim was beauty for rendering of the heks, but the

0:29:03.600 --> 0:29:07.680
<v Speaker 1>very beginning, I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore,

0:29:07.720 --> 0:29:10.320
<v Speaker 1>implying clearly that he's been keeping a lot of this within.

0:29:10.560 --> 0:29:13.200
<v Speaker 1>He had hinted in the past that he was against

0:29:13.280 --> 0:29:15.880
<v Speaker 1>some of the some of this fiscal bill and some

0:29:15.920 --> 0:29:17.760
<v Speaker 1>of the pork that goes through. And to be clear,

0:29:18.240 --> 0:29:20.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, as somebody who as the Doge Father, was

0:29:20.960 --> 0:29:24.800
<v Speaker 1>trying to cut government spending, shrink the deficit, this big

0:29:24.840 --> 0:29:27.440
<v Speaker 1>beautiful mill will only add to the deficit quite a bit.

0:29:27.640 --> 0:29:29.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, undeniably. It makes him look bad.

0:29:29.480 --> 0:29:32.320
<v Speaker 2>And we talked about this when we were talking about

0:29:32.320 --> 0:29:36.880
<v Speaker 2>Doge way back when that all this talk about cutting deficits. Meanwhile, Trump,

0:29:37.120 --> 0:29:40.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, is also talking about these you know, massive

0:29:40.320 --> 0:29:42.360
<v Speaker 2>spending increases via these tax cuts.

0:29:42.680 --> 0:29:44.800
<v Speaker 3>This has kind of been simmering along.

0:29:45.600 --> 0:29:49.480
<v Speaker 2>To me, this is probably just a continuation of the

0:29:49.560 --> 0:29:51.680
<v Speaker 2>negotiation that I mentioned.

0:29:51.560 --> 0:29:53.680
<v Speaker 1>When we record the show, the Grand Bargain.

0:29:54.160 --> 0:29:55.160
<v Speaker 3>He you know, there are.

0:29:55.080 --> 0:29:57.000
<v Speaker 2>Things that he wants in this bill. He has talked

0:29:57.000 --> 0:29:59.640
<v Speaker 2>about what he wants in this bill publicly. He wants

0:29:59.680 --> 0:30:02.400
<v Speaker 2>these ev tax credits. He also earlier in the day

0:30:02.680 --> 0:30:05.600
<v Speaker 2>he was complaining that the US is falling behind on soular.

0:30:05.760 --> 0:30:08.200
<v Speaker 3>You know that that China. So so there are things

0:30:08.240 --> 0:30:12.320
<v Speaker 3>he wants so he doesn't like he wants his own pork.

0:30:12.600 --> 0:30:16.840
<v Speaker 2>But I think clearly this is ideological for Elon Musk

0:30:16.880 --> 0:30:18.000
<v Speaker 2>in addition to being practical.

0:30:18.080 --> 0:30:22.320
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think he does believe that the government and

0:30:22.400 --> 0:30:23.479
<v Speaker 1>so so I think some of that.

0:30:23.640 --> 0:30:24.960
<v Speaker 3>So I think that's part of it.

0:30:25.280 --> 0:30:27.440
<v Speaker 2>You also, you know, there is a danger in a

0:30:27.520 --> 0:30:30.800
<v Speaker 2>negotiation that it can turn into a fight, right that

0:30:30.800 --> 0:30:33.920
<v Speaker 2>that like that what he's doing here is dice and

0:30:34.000 --> 0:30:37.520
<v Speaker 2>puts Trump in a kind of a difficult position because Trump,

0:30:37.520 --> 0:30:39.640
<v Speaker 2>because Musk is a big donor, because he has a

0:30:39.720 --> 0:30:43.880
<v Speaker 2>huge footprint. We actually already saw Carolyn Levitt, the Press Secretary,

0:30:43.960 --> 0:30:47.160
<v Speaker 2>respond to this, saying Trump is well aware of Elon's

0:30:47.160 --> 0:30:48.320
<v Speaker 2>feelings about the buildings.

0:30:48.880 --> 0:30:51.520
<v Speaker 3>He thinks it's still big and it's still beautiful. So

0:30:51.560 --> 0:30:52.440
<v Speaker 3>we're moving ahead.

0:30:52.720 --> 0:30:55.680
<v Speaker 1>But I suspect at some point, not necessarily today, but

0:30:55.720 --> 0:30:58.520
<v Speaker 1>at some point in the near future, Trump himself will respond.

0:30:58.560 --> 0:31:01.040
<v Speaker 2>Just one last thing, David. You know, Musk has also

0:31:01.200 --> 0:31:06.920
<v Speaker 2>been retweeting various Senators, Mike Lee as well as Thomas Massey.

0:31:07.160 --> 0:31:11.320
<v Speaker 2>He is essentially allying himself with the kind of hawkish,

0:31:11.440 --> 0:31:14.680
<v Speaker 2>the budget hawkish, the sort of Freedom Caucus, the hawks

0:31:14.800 --> 0:31:17.840
<v Speaker 2>wing of the Republican Party. Not you shouldn't read this

0:31:17.840 --> 0:31:20.200
<v Speaker 2>and thing. Oh Musk is about to like leave the

0:31:20.240 --> 0:31:21.360
<v Speaker 2>Republican Party or something.

0:31:21.440 --> 0:31:21.760
<v Speaker 1>He is.

0:31:22.000 --> 0:31:25.120
<v Speaker 3>He is attacking Trump from the right. So that's just

0:31:25.160 --> 0:31:27.800
<v Speaker 3>something to keep in mind as this negotiation goes on.

0:31:28.160 --> 0:31:31.400
<v Speaker 1>All right, thank you Max for coming back, racing back

0:31:31.440 --> 0:31:34.160
<v Speaker 1>into the studio for this little segment. Now, can we

0:31:34.200 --> 0:31:42.120
<v Speaker 1>please talk about the black eye? I can't wait. All right,

0:31:42.160 --> 0:31:44.160
<v Speaker 1>I want to do one last thing here before we wrap,

0:31:44.240 --> 0:31:47.240
<v Speaker 1>which is you know, Max, at that send off that

0:31:47.360 --> 0:31:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Muscot in the White House, it was Trump and Musk,

0:31:50.880 --> 0:31:54.400
<v Speaker 1>and Musk appeared to have something of a black eye,

0:31:54.480 --> 0:31:55.560
<v Speaker 1>a shiner.

0:31:55.440 --> 0:31:58.280
<v Speaker 2>A literal black eye, not like political black guy, not

0:31:58.320 --> 0:31:59.800
<v Speaker 2>a metaphorical.

0:31:59.200 --> 0:31:59.800
<v Speaker 3>Bat black guy.

0:32:00.080 --> 0:32:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Those two.

0:32:00.840 --> 0:32:02.880
<v Speaker 3>It was pretty unmissible. You could see it.

0:32:02.960 --> 0:32:07.280
<v Speaker 2>I was watching this on TV, and even kind of

0:32:07.320 --> 0:32:09.120
<v Speaker 2>across the room you could kind of see there's something

0:32:09.240 --> 0:32:10.080
<v Speaker 2>something on his face.

0:32:10.240 --> 0:32:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Max, we have the tape, the clip in which

0:32:14.560 --> 0:32:22.360
<v Speaker 1>Musk responds to a question about that black eye. Us, Well,

0:32:22.400 --> 0:32:34.200
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't. I wasn't anywhere near friends, so but I

0:32:34.240 --> 0:32:34.600
<v Speaker 1>didn't know.

0:32:35.360 --> 0:32:38.200
<v Speaker 2>So uh yeah, I was just watching around with Alex

0:32:38.320 --> 0:32:40.640
<v Speaker 2>and I said, go ahead, punch me in the face

0:32:40.680 --> 0:32:42.480
<v Speaker 2>and he did. It turns out even a five year

0:32:42.480 --> 0:32:44.600
<v Speaker 2>old punching you in the in the face actually does.

0:32:48.400 --> 0:32:50.520
<v Speaker 1>So Little X knocked.

0:32:50.520 --> 0:32:52.880
<v Speaker 3>Oh my god. That is a rich text if there

0:32:52.880 --> 0:32:53.560
<v Speaker 3>ever was one.

0:32:53.640 --> 0:32:56.240
<v Speaker 2>Right, I mean, you have the the sort of really

0:32:56.360 --> 0:33:01.520
<v Speaker 2>awkward joke about the on and and uh and his

0:33:01.560 --> 0:33:06.120
<v Speaker 2>wife uh. And then Trump's reaction to the news of

0:33:06.200 --> 0:33:11.000
<v Speaker 2>Little X, say, Little X, he's got a right or whatever.

0:33:11.320 --> 0:33:13.920
<v Speaker 2>You know, there were those lip reading videos. Have those

0:33:13.960 --> 0:33:16.360
<v Speaker 2>come up on this of Trump and Little X talking

0:33:16.400 --> 0:33:19.640
<v Speaker 2>in the Oval office where it seemed like maybe Little

0:33:19.880 --> 0:33:22.560
<v Speaker 2>X had had been somewhat rude to the president. There

0:33:22.560 --> 0:33:24.200
<v Speaker 2>have been a lot of funny things written about this,

0:33:24.320 --> 0:33:26.680
<v Speaker 2>and and you know, I've got little kids too, and

0:33:26.680 --> 0:33:27.160
<v Speaker 2>and I have.

0:33:27.240 --> 0:33:29.440
<v Speaker 1>You ever gotten black eyes from your kids?

0:33:29.480 --> 0:33:31.680
<v Speaker 2>No? But I totally can see it. It's it's it's

0:33:31.720 --> 0:33:33.640
<v Speaker 2>totally plausible that like that story.

0:33:33.760 --> 0:33:35.560
<v Speaker 3>I think, I'm sure Sarah.

0:33:35.440 --> 0:33:36.680
<v Speaker 1>You don't even have a brood of them.

0:33:36.880 --> 0:33:39.400
<v Speaker 2>Well, there have been some pretty amusing stories written sort

0:33:39.440 --> 0:33:42.880
<v Speaker 2>of speculating on who it can who are so the

0:33:43.000 --> 0:33:46.080
<v Speaker 2>Times pointed out right like like there are lots of

0:33:46.120 --> 0:33:50.880
<v Speaker 2>Trump world folks. There are Tesla shareholders, there are and

0:33:50.880 --> 0:33:51.640
<v Speaker 2>and and like.

0:33:52.000 --> 0:33:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Gotta be Scott Bessen in that list, right they.

0:33:55.360 --> 0:33:58.120
<v Speaker 2>I feel like it was kind of almost insulting because

0:33:58.640 --> 0:34:01.440
<v Speaker 2>we on this podcast for over a year have maintained

0:34:01.480 --> 0:34:04.719
<v Speaker 2>a feud watch. We have a ready list of suspects,

0:34:04.960 --> 0:34:07.800
<v Speaker 2>and no one mentioned that. No one mentioned Bill Gates,

0:34:07.960 --> 0:34:10.479
<v Speaker 2>no one mentioned Sam Altman, no one mentioned the guy

0:34:10.480 --> 0:34:13.040
<v Speaker 2>that Elon Musk has specifically, you know, said he.

0:34:13.040 --> 0:34:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Was gonna fight Mark Zuckerberg.

0:34:14.680 --> 0:34:18.040
<v Speaker 3>We have talked about this stuff for hours. It feels

0:34:18.080 --> 0:34:18.959
<v Speaker 3>anyway you think.

0:34:18.880 --> 0:34:20.759
<v Speaker 1>The investigations to start with those guys, I.

0:34:20.719 --> 0:34:24.799
<v Speaker 4>Mean, someone Buckerberg would be no that would happen. There

0:34:24.840 --> 0:34:27.400
<v Speaker 4>was no they would They would have no octagon set up.

0:34:27.440 --> 0:34:28.399
<v Speaker 4>It would be a whole thing.

0:34:28.800 --> 0:34:29.000
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:34:29.080 --> 0:34:32.160
<v Speaker 2>It's also possible, of course that in that time story

0:34:32.160 --> 0:34:34.120
<v Speaker 2>there are a lot of romantic entanglements.

0:34:34.160 --> 0:34:35.359
<v Speaker 3>Like I don't know, but.

0:34:35.360 --> 0:34:38.160
<v Speaker 1>That said, I think we should. I think we should.

0:34:37.880 --> 0:34:41.160
<v Speaker 2>Probably take Elon at his word until we until we

0:34:41.200 --> 0:34:41.720
<v Speaker 2>hear otherwise.

0:34:41.800 --> 0:34:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Has anybody asked X Yeah, not that I know, Okay, Max, Sarah,

0:34:47.400 --> 0:34:49.040
<v Speaker 1>thank you as always, thanks.

0:34:48.840 --> 0:34:49.399
<v Speaker 4>For having us.

0:34:49.560 --> 0:34:50.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, thank you, David.

0:34:58.040 --> 0:35:01.000
<v Speaker 1>This episode was produced by Stacy Wan Blake Maples Handles

0:35:01.000 --> 0:35:04.200
<v Speaker 1>engineering and Dave per self fact checks. Anna Masa Raucis

0:35:04.280 --> 0:35:07.320
<v Speaker 1>is our editor and our supervising producer is Magnus Henricson.

0:35:07.760 --> 0:35:09.960
<v Speaker 1>The etl on ing theme is written and performed by

0:35:10.040 --> 0:35:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Taka Yasuzawa and Alex Sugierra. Brendan Francis Newnham is our

0:35:14.000 --> 0:35:17.120
<v Speaker 1>executive producer, and Sage Bauman is the head of Bloomberg Podcasts.

0:35:17.760 --> 0:35:20.440
<v Speaker 1>A big thanks as always to our supporters Joe Weber

0:35:20.440 --> 0:35:23.920
<v Speaker 1>and Brad Stone. I'm David Papadopoulos. If you have a minute,

0:35:24.000 --> 0:35:27.000
<v Speaker 1>rate and review our show, it'll help other listeners find us.

0:35:27.280 --> 0:35:28.080
<v Speaker 1>See you next week.