WEBVTT - Cowboys Break: Predicting #DALvsSEA

0:00:01.760 --> 0:00:04.280
<v Speaker 1>The following. He's a production of Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:00:04.280 --> 0:00:07.440
<v Speaker 1>and the Dallas Cowboys Football Club. Are you ready for

0:00:07.480 --> 0:00:12.040
<v Speaker 1>a break? Are you ready for a break? Absolutely ready

0:00:12.280 --> 0:00:15.920
<v Speaker 1>for a break. Yeah, and so much for that. It's

0:00:16.000 --> 0:00:21.880
<v Speaker 1>time for the Break on Dallas Cowboys dot Com with

0:00:22.000 --> 0:00:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Nick Eatman, David Hellman, and bar Garcia and Derek Eagleton. Hello, guys,

0:00:28.840 --> 0:00:32.440
<v Speaker 1>we are back today. We're gonna talk about game day

0:00:32.520 --> 0:00:35.840
<v Speaker 1>predictions and all that fun stuff. But before we get

0:00:35.880 --> 0:00:41.440
<v Speaker 1>into it, how about them Cleveland Brown Shout out Brown Wow,

0:00:42.000 --> 0:00:45.040
<v Speaker 1>shout out. I've never been so hyped for a game

0:00:45.080 --> 0:00:47.440
<v Speaker 1>and it didn't involve a team I care about. So

0:00:47.520 --> 0:00:56.480
<v Speaker 1>they've turned their first game Sincember. They beat the Jets,

0:00:56.560 --> 0:00:59.160
<v Speaker 1>and that was pretty exciting. I mean, I'm surprised they

0:00:59.160 --> 0:01:02.240
<v Speaker 1>are still Browns fans out there, but there were a

0:01:02.240 --> 0:01:06.000
<v Speaker 1>ton of themselves. Honestly, you're saying some hardcore fans in

0:01:06.040 --> 0:01:08.319
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland you would really hardcore. You would jump ship on

0:01:08.319 --> 0:01:10.400
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys if it wins South like that, You're just like,

0:01:10.600 --> 0:01:12.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to root for this. Well, it's different.

0:01:12.360 --> 0:01:15.160
<v Speaker 1>The Cowboys do win games, but but what if they didn't.

0:01:15.280 --> 0:01:17.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's what that's what fans are for, Like,

0:01:17.560 --> 0:01:20.400
<v Speaker 1>you can't leave your team like three years no wins.

0:01:20.440 --> 0:01:25.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, miserable fans, bro because of LSU. You know

0:01:25.160 --> 0:01:30.039
<v Speaker 1>about that life. I don't even come at me, Garcia,

0:01:30.200 --> 0:01:33.120
<v Speaker 1>that's the most ignorant thing you've ever said. Wow, we

0:01:33.160 --> 0:01:35.679
<v Speaker 1>haven't missed a bowl game since like nineteen ninety nine.

0:01:35.920 --> 0:01:38.600
<v Speaker 1>I'll admit it. I don't know anything about college football,

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:43.640
<v Speaker 1>but I do know that what is it? SMU loses

0:01:43.720 --> 0:01:47.280
<v Speaker 1>games all the time they do, and LSU loses game

0:01:48.000 --> 0:01:49.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the time. I'm about to freak out.

0:01:49.800 --> 0:01:52.560
<v Speaker 1>That's not even close to being the same thing. I'm

0:01:52.600 --> 0:01:55.800
<v Speaker 1>just enjoying. I'm back and forth. But anyway, it's the

0:01:55.840 --> 0:01:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Browns are celebrating today after did you watch the game

0:01:59.480 --> 0:02:01.640
<v Speaker 1>day whole thing? Yeah, the whole thing, And you said

0:02:01.680 --> 0:02:04.120
<v Speaker 1>you were watched most of it. I had a little time,

0:02:04.160 --> 0:02:05.480
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't watch it, but I watched most of it.

0:02:05.640 --> 0:02:08.160
<v Speaker 1>So based on what you've seen in the past and

0:02:08.240 --> 0:02:12.120
<v Speaker 1>now this game changer with this new quarterback, what are

0:02:12.160 --> 0:02:15.919
<v Speaker 1>the expectations now that we need to talk a lot

0:02:15.960 --> 0:02:18.560
<v Speaker 1>about the Browns right now, but it changes. I was

0:02:18.600 --> 0:02:21.760
<v Speaker 1>actually kind of shocked that Baker played as well as

0:02:21.760 --> 0:02:23.720
<v Speaker 1>he did when he got in there. I mean, Dave,

0:02:23.800 --> 0:02:25.680
<v Speaker 1>you've been saying, and I give you all credit, you've

0:02:25.720 --> 0:02:27.880
<v Speaker 1>been saying forever. No. You said when they made the

0:02:27.919 --> 0:02:29.640
<v Speaker 1>draft pick, you were like, he's gonna be good for them,

0:02:29.639 --> 0:02:31.160
<v Speaker 1>And I remember us having that conversation. I was like,

0:02:31.160 --> 0:02:33.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm not buying it. I have to see it. I

0:02:33.160 --> 0:02:35.480
<v Speaker 1>wasn't expecting to be that good. I love Baker, but

0:02:35.720 --> 0:02:38.560
<v Speaker 1>anybody that says they expected him to go in in

0:02:38.600 --> 0:02:40.080
<v Speaker 1>the middle of a game, I don't care if it

0:02:40.080 --> 0:02:42.079
<v Speaker 1>is the New York Jets, like seventeen to twenty three

0:02:42.080 --> 0:02:43.920
<v Speaker 1>for two hundred and there were a couple throws there

0:02:43.960 --> 0:02:46.240
<v Speaker 1>that were like wow, leading them down, letting them back

0:02:46.280 --> 0:02:49.400
<v Speaker 1>from fourteen nothing to win. I mean even I wouldn't

0:02:49.400 --> 0:02:51.320
<v Speaker 1>have predicted he would be that good. And yeah, like

0:02:51.400 --> 0:02:54.560
<v Speaker 1>he I mean he was slinging the rock like it was. Yeah,

0:02:54.639 --> 0:02:56.760
<v Speaker 1>it was impressive. It definitely was impressive. And I think

0:02:56.800 --> 0:02:59.440
<v Speaker 1>we're impressive. Those those over there on Brown's break today,

0:03:00.240 --> 0:03:02.320
<v Speaker 1>they got a lot to talk about. They're pretty excited

0:03:02.400 --> 0:03:05.840
<v Speaker 1>right now, would expect which it's only one game. Hey,

0:03:05.880 --> 0:03:08.000
<v Speaker 1>for all the haters out there, like Dak has played

0:03:08.040 --> 0:03:11.040
<v Speaker 1>games like that, before. So don't you know he's not

0:03:11.720 --> 0:03:14.040
<v Speaker 1>He's not the second Coming because of that game. He's

0:03:14.440 --> 0:03:17.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna have his struggles. They're gonna quote unquote figure him

0:03:17.680 --> 0:03:20.320
<v Speaker 1>out too. That's what the NFL does. But no, like

0:03:20.360 --> 0:03:22.040
<v Speaker 1>I would be so pumped if I was a Browns

0:03:22.040 --> 0:03:26.920
<v Speaker 1>fantas see DeShawn Lesson. Yeah, well, congratulations to them, Jimmy Garoppolo,

0:03:27.040 --> 0:03:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Go Brownies, Go Browns. Okay, so let's jump into the inactives.

0:03:31.800 --> 0:03:35.360
<v Speaker 1>Who we think we'll be inactive this week. Cole Beasley

0:03:35.440 --> 0:03:39.120
<v Speaker 1>did pop up yesterday with a limited um. He was

0:03:39.200 --> 0:03:43.480
<v Speaker 1>limited in practice with an ankle injury, and I mean

0:03:44.320 --> 0:03:46.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know the severity of it. He was taking

0:03:47.120 --> 0:03:51.040
<v Speaker 1>part in practice today actually, like I got, I have

0:03:51.120 --> 0:03:53.200
<v Speaker 1>so many things going on on a Friday morning. Not

0:03:53.240 --> 0:03:54.920
<v Speaker 1>to pat myself on the back, but I didn't even

0:03:54.920 --> 0:03:58.760
<v Speaker 1>make it to practice today. But he did take part

0:03:58.800 --> 0:04:00.840
<v Speaker 1>in the open portion of practice today. I know that

0:04:00.840 --> 0:04:04.960
<v Speaker 1>thinks to Twitter. So he's out there. I'm not super

0:04:04.960 --> 0:04:07.320
<v Speaker 1>worried about him, I don't think So, who are you

0:04:07.360 --> 0:04:09.760
<v Speaker 1>worried about it? You're worried about Millie Collins. Yeah, I

0:04:09.800 --> 0:04:12.320
<v Speaker 1>don't think Millie Collins is well, he hasn't practiced. Yeah, right,

0:04:12.360 --> 0:04:15.680
<v Speaker 1>he hasn't practiced. Um, so got him out. Then what

0:04:15.800 --> 0:04:20.040
<v Speaker 1>about Sean Lee? Sean he was limited yesterday. Sean says

0:04:20.080 --> 0:04:22.720
<v Speaker 1>he's playing. Jerry says he's playing. He moved from did

0:04:22.760 --> 0:04:25.080
<v Speaker 1>not practice to limited yesterday. Okay, can I ask you

0:04:25.080 --> 0:04:28.120
<v Speaker 1>a question? And you you've been You're obviously a beat writer,

0:04:28.240 --> 0:04:31.000
<v Speaker 1>so you kind of are in the mix. So what's

0:04:31.040 --> 0:04:33.320
<v Speaker 1>the deal? Was it a what was the deal with

0:04:33.320 --> 0:04:35.520
<v Speaker 1>his hamstring? Is it? Is it a hamstring? Is it

0:04:35.560 --> 0:04:38.599
<v Speaker 1>a cramp? And it keeps kind of going back? Did

0:04:38.600 --> 0:04:41.200
<v Speaker 1>you hear did you hear what Sean said yesterday? Yeah?

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:43.080
<v Speaker 1>I kind of read a little bit of it, so

0:04:44.240 --> 0:04:47.719
<v Speaker 1>described as hamstring tightness on Sunday, Right, Sean came back

0:04:47.760 --> 0:04:50.080
<v Speaker 1>and he was like, I really thought it was more

0:04:50.160 --> 0:04:51.960
<v Speaker 1>of a cramp and bait. I mean, I don't want

0:04:51.960 --> 0:04:53.960
<v Speaker 1>to put words in Sean Lee's mouth, but like, and

0:04:54.000 --> 0:04:56.120
<v Speaker 1>you could even see during the game he was like

0:04:56.279 --> 0:04:58.280
<v Speaker 1>arguing with the medical stat like he didn't want to

0:04:58.320 --> 0:05:00.440
<v Speaker 1>go in the tent and get looked at. So I

0:05:00.279 --> 0:05:03.159
<v Speaker 1>imagine a scenario where he's like it's fine, I'm fine,

0:05:03.240 --> 0:05:06.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm cramping and they're like whatever, you got hamstring issues,

0:05:06.320 --> 0:05:07.960
<v Speaker 1>but you know you need Yeah, we need to look

0:05:08.000 --> 0:05:11.440
<v Speaker 1>at you. And so I think that's just an agreement.

0:05:11.640 --> 0:05:14.240
<v Speaker 1>You agree to disagree about what's wrong. So he's still

0:05:14.279 --> 0:05:17.839
<v Speaker 1>he still believes and wholeheartedly believes there was a cramp.

0:05:17.920 --> 0:05:22.400
<v Speaker 1>The quote of the week probably was, um, somebody asked

0:05:22.480 --> 0:05:24.360
<v Speaker 1>him that yesterday, were like, is it a cramp in

0:05:24.600 --> 0:05:26.560
<v Speaker 1>your hand? Like what's going on? And Sean was like,

0:05:27.120 --> 0:05:29.680
<v Speaker 1>it's a cramp in my hamstring, and like everybody's like,

0:05:29.920 --> 0:05:32.039
<v Speaker 1>that's not how that works, Like, you don't cramp in

0:05:32.040 --> 0:05:34.600
<v Speaker 1>your hamstring. As far as I'm aware, I just think

0:05:34.680 --> 0:05:37.719
<v Speaker 1>that's different. I think Sean is just trying to you know,

0:05:37.760 --> 0:05:40.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean and rightfully so, like alarm bells go off

0:05:40.400 --> 0:05:42.400
<v Speaker 1>when you hear Sean Lee hamstring. So I think he's

0:05:42.400 --> 0:05:45.840
<v Speaker 1>just trying to do his part to allay that concern.

0:05:45.920 --> 0:05:47.839
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't want people freaking out. All the way that

0:05:47.839 --> 0:05:50.360
<v Speaker 1>he allays that concern is he comes out and he plays.

0:05:50.440 --> 0:05:52.760
<v Speaker 1>He's playing, rights saying so if he can play, then

0:05:52.800 --> 0:05:54.479
<v Speaker 1>you're like, okay, it was a cramp. Yeah. If he

0:05:54.520 --> 0:05:58.600
<v Speaker 1>can't play, then you're like, and he might be off

0:05:58.640 --> 0:06:02.719
<v Speaker 1>for six weeks. We'll see it's yeah, but he's I

0:06:02.760 --> 0:06:05.000
<v Speaker 1>expect him to play, all right, good, good, Well he

0:06:05.040 --> 0:06:07.719
<v Speaker 1>said he would play, but then Jerry, I don't know,

0:06:08.160 --> 0:06:12.240
<v Speaker 1>he still said that it was hit about him and

0:06:12.640 --> 0:06:18.040
<v Speaker 1>who else was it that he Gregory and and you know,

0:06:18.520 --> 0:06:21.279
<v Speaker 1>teams don't want to give that away for game planning purposes,

0:06:21.279 --> 0:06:24.200
<v Speaker 1>and also which I feel like Jerry has kind of

0:06:24.279 --> 0:06:26.840
<v Speaker 1>changed his tune about that in recent years. Like I think,

0:06:26.960 --> 0:06:29.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, Jerry at one point in time would just

0:06:29.600 --> 0:06:31.640
<v Speaker 1>be like, yeah, he's gonna play, but now I think

0:06:31.640 --> 0:06:34.440
<v Speaker 1>he kind of defers to his coaching staff like, well,

0:06:34.520 --> 0:06:36.479
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to give up the goose on Friday

0:06:36.520 --> 0:06:38.520
<v Speaker 1>morning when you know, we're trying to take this thing

0:06:38.520 --> 0:06:41.760
<v Speaker 1>to Sunday. So he said Randy Gregory and Xavier Woods

0:06:41.800 --> 0:06:44.080
<v Speaker 1>are game time decisions, but he said he feels very

0:06:44.120 --> 0:06:48.240
<v Speaker 1>optimistic that they'll be available. Me reading between lines, I

0:06:48.279 --> 0:06:50.440
<v Speaker 1>think they'll both play and both of practice this week.

0:06:50.560 --> 0:06:52.800
<v Speaker 1>So you would hope, you would hope that you're progressing.

0:06:52.880 --> 0:06:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Would be disappointing if they didn't. Yeah, so this will

0:06:55.600 --> 0:06:57.320
<v Speaker 1>be a little bit of a different week because when

0:06:57.360 --> 0:06:59.479
<v Speaker 1>you start looking at inactives, yeah, you don't have the

0:06:59.480 --> 0:07:02.400
<v Speaker 1>same number umber of guys that are injured that make

0:07:02.800 --> 0:07:05.400
<v Speaker 1>your your inactive list a little. It kind of creates

0:07:05.400 --> 0:07:07.800
<v Speaker 1>it for you. Right So basically, I mean right now,

0:07:07.839 --> 0:07:11.360
<v Speaker 1>he's Millie Collins, Trevis Travis Frederick. I think those are

0:07:11.400 --> 0:07:15.040
<v Speaker 1>both very good bets. Mike White and every week is

0:07:15.080 --> 0:07:17.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna be y. So then you got four you got

0:07:17.760 --> 0:07:20.320
<v Speaker 1>to come up with that are healthy scratches. I think

0:07:20.360 --> 0:07:22.680
<v Speaker 1>if Sean Lee is gonna play, that means you probably

0:07:22.680 --> 0:07:25.440
<v Speaker 1>don't need Chris Covington. I don't think he got into

0:07:25.480 --> 0:07:27.440
<v Speaker 1>the game against the Giants the other night. I don't

0:07:27.480 --> 0:07:29.239
<v Speaker 1>think so he was active, but I don't think he played,

0:07:29.320 --> 0:07:32.400
<v Speaker 1>so okay, so i'd be Chris Covington. You got four,

0:07:32.520 --> 0:07:37.120
<v Speaker 1>need three more. You pick an interior offensive lineman. Maybe

0:07:37.200 --> 0:07:39.320
<v Speaker 1>you know Xavier sue A Philo, he's been here for

0:07:39.360 --> 0:07:42.280
<v Speaker 1>a little while. Maybe he gets in or Adam Redmond,

0:07:42.440 --> 0:07:45.560
<v Speaker 1>whichever of those, one of the two, one of the two, um,

0:07:45.680 --> 0:07:49.040
<v Speaker 1>one of the two tight ends. Probably again, take your pick.

0:07:49.120 --> 0:07:52.520
<v Speaker 1>I hope Rico's up again to think he showed he

0:07:52.560 --> 0:07:55.920
<v Speaker 1>didn't really show anything, but just he had the opportunities

0:07:55.920 --> 0:07:59.480
<v Speaker 1>were there that I hope he gets another shot. I no,

0:07:59.560 --> 0:08:01.440
<v Speaker 1>go ahead, I was just gonna say, surely, and I

0:08:01.480 --> 0:08:04.000
<v Speaker 1>was moving on to the next position, and then you

0:08:04.080 --> 0:08:06.400
<v Speaker 1>have to sit a receiver. I don't know how you don't,

0:08:06.640 --> 0:08:09.240
<v Speaker 1>but no, that's that's an interesting question though, if right

0:08:09.280 --> 0:08:11.920
<v Speaker 1>now you were you were faced with that question, which

0:08:11.920 --> 0:08:17.160
<v Speaker 1>of those guys you think you put down? If everything

0:08:17.360 --> 0:08:21.680
<v Speaker 1>is okay with Terrence, which so I mean, it's it's

0:08:21.880 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 1>it's always so convoluted with the Cowboys. But you know

0:08:24.200 --> 0:08:28.000
<v Speaker 1>reports the surface last night that he was facing a suspension,

0:08:28.120 --> 0:08:30.280
<v Speaker 1>and I think you know, when you add a seventh

0:08:30.280 --> 0:08:32.440
<v Speaker 1>receiver that's familiar with the scheme in the middle of

0:08:32.440 --> 0:08:35.079
<v Speaker 1>the week, that is something in your mind immediately goes

0:08:35.120 --> 0:08:37.320
<v Speaker 1>to I don't think anybody would be smitching that yesterday. Yeah,

0:08:37.360 --> 0:08:41.640
<v Speaker 1>super surprised. But the Cowboys don't appear to agree with that.

0:08:41.720 --> 0:08:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Jerry Jones said he didn't know. You know, He's like,

0:08:44.240 --> 0:08:46.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know about the accuracy of that. It would

0:08:46.600 --> 0:08:49.120
<v Speaker 1>be bad if we didn't have Terrence, but we're counting

0:08:49.160 --> 0:08:51.199
<v Speaker 1>on having him, So I don't know what to make

0:08:51.200 --> 0:08:52.800
<v Speaker 1>of that. Yeah, And to be honest with you, it

0:08:52.840 --> 0:08:54.960
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have to be anything. No, I think it's just

0:08:55.080 --> 0:08:57.280
<v Speaker 1>again because of the nature of it, and this is

0:08:57.280 --> 0:08:59.439
<v Speaker 1>what we were talking about yesterday because of the nature

0:08:59.480 --> 0:09:01.720
<v Speaker 1>of how it all came about with Bryce. Then all

0:09:01.760 --> 0:09:04.400
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden they add a seventh receiver when they

0:09:04.440 --> 0:09:07.360
<v Speaker 1>didn't think they need it one at first, and otherwise

0:09:07.480 --> 0:09:10.960
<v Speaker 1>nothing has changed other than two games of play, where okay,

0:09:11.120 --> 0:09:13.240
<v Speaker 1>is it because you think you need more help at

0:09:13.240 --> 0:09:15.600
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver, or is because something's going to happen with

0:09:15.679 --> 0:09:17.760
<v Speaker 1>Terrence because you know at some point the league's gonna

0:09:17.760 --> 0:09:19.280
<v Speaker 1>have a ruling one way or the other one Terrence.

0:09:19.360 --> 0:09:21.840
<v Speaker 1>In a way, it's a lot like the Zeke situation

0:09:21.920 --> 0:09:25.040
<v Speaker 1>last year. It's just nowhere near as high profile, one

0:09:25.720 --> 0:09:28.760
<v Speaker 1>because it's nowhere near as serious of a situation, and

0:09:28.840 --> 0:09:31.800
<v Speaker 1>two because Terrence is nowhere near is important to your team.

0:09:32.200 --> 0:09:36.160
<v Speaker 1>So but I'm you know, let's say that happens, and

0:09:36.200 --> 0:09:38.360
<v Speaker 1>I have no idea, but it might not happen this week.

0:09:38.360 --> 0:09:40.080
<v Speaker 1>It could happen next week, and that could just be

0:09:40.160 --> 0:09:41.719
<v Speaker 1>them trying to get ahead of it. I don't know.

0:09:44.600 --> 0:09:47.240
<v Speaker 1>That's what makes the most sense. Terrence has done so

0:09:47.360 --> 0:09:51.200
<v Speaker 1>little this season that you could sit him, or you know,

0:09:51.240 --> 0:09:54.160
<v Speaker 1>depending on how Bryce practiced this week, you could sit him,

0:09:54.200 --> 0:09:56.360
<v Speaker 1>like if he looked terrible. If he looked like a

0:09:56.360 --> 0:09:58.360
<v Speaker 1>guy who hasn't been practicing for a month, maybe you

0:09:58.400 --> 0:10:01.200
<v Speaker 1>sit him, or maybe he looked great and he gives

0:10:01.200 --> 0:10:02.920
<v Speaker 1>you something that you don't have, so you sit. I

0:10:03.000 --> 0:10:04.360
<v Speaker 1>think it would have to be one of those two.

0:10:04.400 --> 0:10:07.320
<v Speaker 1>You don't think it would be a have a hard

0:10:07.320 --> 0:10:09.200
<v Speaker 1>time thinking it would be, have a hard time believing

0:10:09.200 --> 0:10:11.160
<v Speaker 1>it would be anybody else, Like it's it's not gonna

0:10:11.200 --> 0:10:13.640
<v Speaker 1>be Tavon, It's not gonna be Gallop, It's not gonna

0:10:13.640 --> 0:10:17.200
<v Speaker 1>be Coal unless Cole's hurt. Wait, right, he's practicing, so

0:10:17.280 --> 0:10:19.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna give him the benefit of the doubt. Um

0:10:20.480 --> 0:10:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Deonte Thompson's played more snaps than anybody, and those four

0:10:24.120 --> 0:10:26.840
<v Speaker 1>seemed pretty steady. Can't imagine it would be Alan Hearns.

0:10:27.280 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 1>I know Alan Hearns hasn't had like this crazy stat line,

0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:31.200
<v Speaker 1>but none of them really. But they're not gonna sit

0:10:31.240 --> 0:10:33.480
<v Speaker 1>all I make him inactive. I wouldn't. I don't for

0:10:33.480 --> 0:10:35.440
<v Speaker 1>a guy that just got here this week. I would

0:10:35.480 --> 0:10:38.959
<v Speaker 1>think it's either Terrence or Bryce unless Cole can't go right,

0:10:39.160 --> 0:10:42.600
<v Speaker 1>So that's yeah, So I'm gonna guess. I'm gonna guess.

0:10:43.080 --> 0:10:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Mike White, Bryce, Adam Redmond, MALIEK. Collins, Travis Frederick, Chris Covington,

0:10:51.800 --> 0:10:55.560
<v Speaker 1>who'd I forget? Oh? And Dalton Schultz. Sorry, there you go.

0:10:55.600 --> 0:10:57.520
<v Speaker 1>I can ask you this. Um, Let's assume for a

0:10:57.559 --> 0:10:59.360
<v Speaker 1>second that the Cowboys had to play a week and

0:10:59.400 --> 0:11:00.839
<v Speaker 1>may mean maybe not this week, but had to play

0:11:00.840 --> 0:11:03.240
<v Speaker 1>a week without Cole Beasley. Do you think that they

0:11:03.240 --> 0:11:08.439
<v Speaker 1>would use um ideally? Would they use um Tavon in

0:11:08.480 --> 0:11:11.480
<v Speaker 1>that role as your slot guy or because Hearns can

0:11:11.480 --> 0:11:13.280
<v Speaker 1>play the slot, will he be the guy that primarily

0:11:13.280 --> 0:11:14.640
<v Speaker 1>would be in there? Who do you think would kind

0:11:14.640 --> 0:11:16.840
<v Speaker 1>of jump into that role if Cole weren't available. I

0:11:16.880 --> 0:11:19.440
<v Speaker 1>would hope it would be Tavon, just because he's got

0:11:19.480 --> 0:11:22.840
<v Speaker 1>that quickness. That's what makes Cole so valuable as a guy.

0:11:22.960 --> 0:11:24.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's not that he's fast to say he's quick.

0:11:24.920 --> 0:11:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Tavon's both, but like is Alan, Hearn's really going to

0:11:28.240 --> 0:11:31.640
<v Speaker 1>create that instant separation with his quick feet, you know,

0:11:31.679 --> 0:11:34.640
<v Speaker 1>within five yards of the line of scrimmage. I don't know.

0:11:34.720 --> 0:11:37.719
<v Speaker 1>I doubt it. Um. I would hope it's Tavon, And

0:11:37.760 --> 0:11:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Tavon has shown that he can do that again. You know,

0:11:41.000 --> 0:11:43.120
<v Speaker 1>he hasn't He hasn't needed to. I guess he's only

0:11:43.120 --> 0:11:46.280
<v Speaker 1>played eighteen snaps that's his season high. So but that's

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:49.480
<v Speaker 1>what I would do. Well, he's the next man up

0:11:49.640 --> 0:11:52.480
<v Speaker 1>closest to doing that kind right, He's the closest skill

0:11:52.480 --> 0:11:57.479
<v Speaker 1>set to what Cole is. Yeah, so that's a fair assumption. Okay,

0:11:58.000 --> 0:12:00.360
<v Speaker 1>before we're going to break and this might be a

0:12:00.360 --> 0:12:04.120
<v Speaker 1>longer discussion, I wanted to touch on Chris Rashard and

0:12:04.160 --> 0:12:07.040
<v Speaker 1>we talked about it a little bit yesterday. He did

0:12:07.200 --> 0:12:11.720
<v Speaker 1>talk to Scott Linahan, you know, helping out game plan

0:12:11.880 --> 0:12:15.120
<v Speaker 1>this whole thing. So he's an important guy this week,

0:12:15.320 --> 0:12:18.920
<v Speaker 1>not only for the defense but also for the offense.

0:12:19.440 --> 0:12:23.360
<v Speaker 1>How big of an impact can we expect from him

0:12:23.440 --> 0:12:27.400
<v Speaker 1>and the offense being able to give those insight information

0:12:27.880 --> 0:12:30.520
<v Speaker 1>from the time that he was at Seattle. I asked

0:12:30.559 --> 0:12:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Jason Garrett about that yesterday and he shockingly downplayed it.

0:12:34.720 --> 0:12:37.920
<v Speaker 1>He was like, oh, always, well, there's interpersonal relationships all

0:12:37.920 --> 0:12:39.760
<v Speaker 1>over the league and that's just a thing, blah blah blah.

0:12:39.760 --> 0:12:41.560
<v Speaker 1>And then I asked Scott Linahan about it and he

0:12:41.640 --> 0:12:46.079
<v Speaker 1>was like, Chris has been great. He gave up every No, dude,

0:12:46.200 --> 0:12:49.240
<v Speaker 1>I would sometimes I hear things that I would I

0:12:49.280 --> 0:12:51.000
<v Speaker 1>would just pay so much money to be a fly

0:12:51.080 --> 0:12:53.840
<v Speaker 1>on the wall. So Lenahan, Lenahan's like, yeah, he came

0:12:53.880 --> 0:12:57.280
<v Speaker 1>in and we watched because Chris Richard was with Seattle

0:12:57.400 --> 0:12:59.680
<v Speaker 1>for every game that Lenahan has coached against the Seahawks.

0:12:59.679 --> 0:13:02.880
<v Speaker 1>So that's three games, the Classic in fourteen, the ugly

0:13:02.960 --> 0:13:05.440
<v Speaker 1>loss in fifteen, and then last year's Christmas Eve game.

0:13:05.640 --> 0:13:07.720
<v Speaker 1>He's like, he came in, we watched all three games,

0:13:07.720 --> 0:13:09.520
<v Speaker 1>and he went through the whole game with me and

0:13:09.559 --> 0:13:11.640
<v Speaker 1>told me, like, you know how the Seahawks like to

0:13:11.679 --> 0:13:13.480
<v Speaker 1>prep for us, and what they think they can do

0:13:13.520 --> 0:13:15.959
<v Speaker 1>against us, and tendencies and all this other stuff. And

0:13:15.960 --> 0:13:18.800
<v Speaker 1>I was like, man, the football dorc and me, I

0:13:18.800 --> 0:13:21.480
<v Speaker 1>would pay an extravagant amount of money to just get

0:13:21.520 --> 0:13:23.320
<v Speaker 1>to watch that. I think it would be so cool.

0:13:23.360 --> 0:13:26.360
<v Speaker 1>And here's the deal. I'm not under the illusion that

0:13:26.440 --> 0:13:28.400
<v Speaker 1>this doesn't happen all across the league. Like, here's it.

0:13:28.679 --> 0:13:31.720
<v Speaker 1>There are all those relationships, here's the difference. The difference is,

0:13:31.800 --> 0:13:34.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't trust it. Every coach is smart enough or

0:13:34.200 --> 0:13:36.440
<v Speaker 1>has a handle enough on what's happening with his old

0:13:36.440 --> 0:13:38.480
<v Speaker 1>team to really be able to break it. Down as

0:13:38.520 --> 0:13:41.840
<v Speaker 1>well as as at least I perceived Chris Rashard. Not

0:13:41.920 --> 0:13:45.000
<v Speaker 1>only that, but like, okay, cool, you coached linebackers in

0:13:45.040 --> 0:13:47.360
<v Speaker 1>Philly for a year and a half, Like big whoop.

0:13:47.400 --> 0:13:50.600
<v Speaker 1>That's not the same Chris Roshard was. He wasn't the

0:13:50.679 --> 0:13:53.080
<v Speaker 1>architect of that defense. Dan Quinn was. But like Chris

0:13:53.160 --> 0:13:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Rashard was in charge of that defense for like four years,

0:13:56.080 --> 0:13:58.040
<v Speaker 1>and he was the coach of the Legion of Boom

0:13:58.120 --> 0:14:01.240
<v Speaker 1>for three years before that, Like, he knows everything about

0:14:01.280 --> 0:14:03.800
<v Speaker 1>how they want to play defense, and also he knows

0:14:03.840 --> 0:14:08.160
<v Speaker 1>everything about how they schemed for this offense for years.

0:14:08.480 --> 0:14:10.800
<v Speaker 1>And I know the quarterback has changed blah blah blah,

0:14:10.800 --> 0:14:14.880
<v Speaker 1>but Lenahan's been calling it since since then, so he

0:14:15.160 --> 0:14:18.040
<v Speaker 1>probably has a lot of information about how the Seahawks

0:14:18.120 --> 0:14:21.280
<v Speaker 1>might prefer to play them exactly. And and I trust

0:14:21.720 --> 0:14:25.640
<v Speaker 1>based upon just the results of what I've seen from

0:14:25.640 --> 0:14:28.200
<v Speaker 1>this defense, which I attribute so much of what we're

0:14:28.200 --> 0:14:30.320
<v Speaker 1>seeing this year from this defense. I think this defense

0:14:30.400 --> 0:14:32.400
<v Speaker 1>was good last year. I think this defense has a

0:14:32.400 --> 0:14:35.280
<v Speaker 1>potential to be great this year. And according to the

0:14:35.280 --> 0:14:38.000
<v Speaker 1>things that I that I heard yesterday, it sounds like

0:14:38.160 --> 0:14:40.560
<v Speaker 1>much of that is attributed at least from a coaching

0:14:40.600 --> 0:14:43.360
<v Speaker 1>side of it, to Chris Richard, and not only is coaching,

0:14:43.360 --> 0:14:46.240
<v Speaker 1>but his ability to call make call play calls during

0:14:46.240 --> 0:14:49.080
<v Speaker 1>the game because they mean Lena, I mean, I'm sorry.

0:14:49.080 --> 0:14:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Marinelli basically said as much yesterday though he's the one

0:14:52.040 --> 0:14:53.960
<v Speaker 1>that's making these calls. The reason why they're blitzing so

0:14:54.040 --> 0:14:56.600
<v Speaker 1>much it is because he's making these calls. So he

0:14:57.560 --> 0:15:00.360
<v Speaker 1>has quickly made an impact on this d defense and

0:15:00.400 --> 0:15:02.000
<v Speaker 1>taking this defense to the point now to where I

0:15:02.040 --> 0:15:06.400
<v Speaker 1>heard a commented earlier today say that that fearsome front,

0:15:06.440 --> 0:15:09.880
<v Speaker 1>that fearsome Dallas front. When's the last time you heard that, right?

0:15:09.880 --> 0:15:12.240
<v Speaker 1>It sounds pretty nice. Yeah, but I'm saying that's but

0:15:12.320 --> 0:15:14.480
<v Speaker 1>that's that's what people are thinking right now around This

0:15:14.480 --> 0:15:16.400
<v Speaker 1>is a national guy. That's what people are thinking right

0:15:16.400 --> 0:15:20.480
<v Speaker 1>now about this defense. Scared. The last time anybody said

0:15:20.520 --> 0:15:23.680
<v Speaker 1>that about this defense was when Where and Spencer were

0:15:23.720 --> 0:15:26.360
<v Speaker 1>your ends and Ratliffe was going to Pro Bowls at

0:15:26.440 --> 0:15:31.080
<v Speaker 1>nose tackle. Yeah that was that was a Super Bowl

0:15:31.120 --> 0:15:33.760
<v Speaker 1>for DeMarcus Ago. Yeah that was a long time ago. Yep.

0:15:34.360 --> 0:15:36.440
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's take our first break when we come back.

0:15:36.480 --> 0:15:41.680
<v Speaker 1>We're getting to yeah, yeah, wow, yeah, yeah, yeah, I

0:15:41.720 --> 0:15:44.080
<v Speaker 1>go all right. It can be hard to find the

0:15:44.160 --> 0:15:47.720
<v Speaker 1>right resource for learning about important financial matters. You search

0:15:47.800 --> 0:15:49.880
<v Speaker 1>how to build savings, you end up reading about the

0:15:49.920 --> 0:15:53.240
<v Speaker 1>one weird ingredient from supermarkets that can make you taller.

0:15:54.000 --> 0:15:56.880
<v Speaker 1>That's why Bank of America build Better Money Habits dot com,

0:15:56.920 --> 0:15:59.120
<v Speaker 1>a safe little corner of the Internet for answering your

0:15:59.120 --> 0:16:02.400
<v Speaker 1>financial question. Full of simple videos and tips, Better Money

0:16:02.400 --> 0:16:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Habits can show you how to make the most of

0:16:04.080 --> 0:16:07.240
<v Speaker 1>your money without resorting to random searches that always seem

0:16:07.280 --> 0:16:10.560
<v Speaker 1>to lead to unbelievable photos of childhood stars grown up.

0:16:10.640 --> 0:16:12.920
<v Speaker 1>To learn more, visit Better Money habits dot com. I

0:16:13.040 --> 0:16:15.520
<v Speaker 1>definitely have an Instagram foody thing, but the low light

0:16:15.600 --> 0:16:18.400
<v Speaker 1>camera on my new Samsung Galaxy S nine from ATNT

0:16:18.640 --> 0:16:20.720
<v Speaker 1>is getting me a whole new world of likes and shares.

0:16:20.960 --> 0:16:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Baskets of bread by candlelight, colorful fruit plates in full sun.

0:16:24.480 --> 0:16:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Even a dimly lit cobb salad was recently hailed as

0:16:27.000 --> 0:16:29.640
<v Speaker 1>a masterpiece. Come in now and ask how to get

0:16:29.640 --> 0:16:32.440
<v Speaker 1>half off the new Samsung Galaxy S nine from AT

0:16:32.600 --> 0:16:35.120
<v Speaker 1>and T. AT and T were't for your thing, that's

0:16:35.120 --> 0:16:37.320
<v Speaker 1>our thing, limited time only. See store for details or

0:16:37.320 --> 0:16:39.720
<v Speaker 1>att dot com sleft Samsung Quick but du laperture supports

0:16:39.720 --> 0:16:41.080
<v Speaker 1>F one five mode and FT two four moo duo

0:16:41.120 --> 0:16:43.720
<v Speaker 1>laberators installed on the view camera. Oh, I am craving

0:16:43.760 --> 0:16:46.120
<v Speaker 1>a Doctor Pepper. I got some soda. I asked not

0:16:46.280 --> 0:16:50.560
<v Speaker 1>for soda, I asked for ice cold, cravable Doctor Pepper.

0:16:50.960 --> 0:16:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Its flavor is more one of a kind than a

0:16:53.560 --> 0:16:58.160
<v Speaker 1>foretold sloth with a thirst for speed. Stop settling for

0:16:58.280 --> 0:17:04.720
<v Speaker 1>soda and start dement Doctor Pepper. I love sloths. When

0:17:04.800 --> 0:17:07.520
<v Speaker 1>you crave a Doctor Pepper, nothing else will do. Grab

0:17:07.560 --> 0:17:10.520
<v Speaker 1>an ice cold twenty ounce of Doctor Pepper today, Doctor Pepper,

0:17:10.640 --> 0:17:13.439
<v Speaker 1>the one you crave. To work this big land. You

0:17:13.520 --> 0:17:16.639
<v Speaker 1>need equipment with values rooted as deep in Texas soil

0:17:16.680 --> 0:17:19.879
<v Speaker 1>as you are. Like John Deer Compact tractors with a

0:17:19.920 --> 0:17:23.000
<v Speaker 1>six year power train warranty, h big features that help

0:17:23.040 --> 0:17:25.119
<v Speaker 1>you work less so you have more time to do

0:17:25.160 --> 0:17:28.159
<v Speaker 1>what you love. John Deer was first in the Texas fields,

0:17:28.160 --> 0:17:30.040
<v Speaker 1>and we're proud to be on the field as the

0:17:30.080 --> 0:17:33.280
<v Speaker 1>official agg and turf equipment of the Dallas Cowboys. Find

0:17:33.280 --> 0:17:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Texas sized deals in my John Deer Dealer dot com.

0:17:36.200 --> 0:17:39.760
<v Speaker 1>Slash football terms, conditions, exclusions, and warranty limitations apply, so

0:17:39.800 --> 0:17:43.600
<v Speaker 1>you can you love for details back to the brain.

0:17:43.760 --> 0:17:47.919
<v Speaker 1>They have to keep going, and so do we. So

0:17:48.440 --> 0:17:50.440
<v Speaker 1>if you want to give us a call, feel free

0:17:50.440 --> 0:17:55.480
<v Speaker 1>to call in eight eight, eight, five, twenty two, nine seven.

0:17:55.720 --> 0:17:59.520
<v Speaker 1>We'll be taking punk calls. So make it good. Better

0:17:59.560 --> 0:18:03.159
<v Speaker 1>be good, better be good, better be good. Okay, predictions

0:18:03.200 --> 0:18:06.800
<v Speaker 1>for this game. I wanted to ask you that, guys,

0:18:07.160 --> 0:18:10.480
<v Speaker 1>do you expect this to finally be the time for

0:18:10.680 --> 0:18:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Rico Gathers to make that game catching ball that will

0:18:16.720 --> 0:18:20.320
<v Speaker 1>break the internet? Game catching ball however you want awarded?

0:18:20.359 --> 0:18:23.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, man, Just catch a ball, catch a

0:18:23.480 --> 0:18:29.080
<v Speaker 1>ball that means something. I gotta I know. I know

0:18:29.160 --> 0:18:30.800
<v Speaker 1>it was right there for him, and it's not his

0:18:30.840 --> 0:18:33.400
<v Speaker 1>fault that Dak should have hit him. No, I gotta.

0:18:33.440 --> 0:18:35.160
<v Speaker 1>I gotta see it to believe it, to be honest

0:18:35.200 --> 0:18:37.600
<v Speaker 1>with you, like, even though it should have happened last week,

0:18:38.080 --> 0:18:40.080
<v Speaker 1>I gotta see it. You don't think this is it? Well,

0:18:40.080 --> 0:18:42.040
<v Speaker 1>we don't even know for sure if he's going to

0:18:42.119 --> 0:18:45.480
<v Speaker 1>be active. So oh, you're just is this the law

0:18:45.480 --> 0:18:48.560
<v Speaker 1>of attraction? You're just like Rico to the active roster.

0:18:49.560 --> 0:18:52.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm just expecting him to be I think that after

0:18:52.200 --> 0:18:54.800
<v Speaker 1>them seeing how close it was, and given the fact

0:18:54.800 --> 0:18:58.800
<v Speaker 1>that it was more Dak's fault not to make it

0:18:58.840 --> 0:19:01.639
<v Speaker 1>happen and get that touch I think that they saw that,

0:19:02.119 --> 0:19:04.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, okay, we do have the opportunity here, we

0:19:04.840 --> 0:19:07.639
<v Speaker 1>can make this happen. And from what I hear, I

0:19:07.680 --> 0:19:11.760
<v Speaker 1>mean they keep practicing this thing between them too, So

0:19:12.160 --> 0:19:14.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm expecting them to keep him active and give him

0:19:14.840 --> 0:19:18.080
<v Speaker 1>more chances for this to happen. I hope. So I'm

0:19:18.119 --> 0:19:20.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna go out on a limb and I'm gonna say

0:19:20.600 --> 0:19:23.640
<v Speaker 1>by the end of this year, Rico will have five touchdowns. Whoa,

0:19:24.480 --> 0:19:28.080
<v Speaker 1>we have five touch based on bet on what, just

0:19:28.960 --> 0:19:31.359
<v Speaker 1>based on the fact that I believe he just has

0:19:31.440 --> 0:19:34.399
<v Speaker 1>too much skill and ability for them not to figure

0:19:34.400 --> 0:19:38.040
<v Speaker 1>out how to use him in the red touchdown. Put

0:19:38.080 --> 0:19:40.960
<v Speaker 1>money on five touchdowns, one of those happening this weekend.

0:19:41.119 --> 0:19:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Anybody on this team besides Das have five touchdowns last year?

0:19:46.160 --> 0:19:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Did anybody on this team besides Das have five and

0:19:48.640 --> 0:19:55.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty six? Five? Yes, five five touchdowns. I'm telling you

0:19:55.080 --> 0:19:59.080
<v Speaker 1>five touchdowns. This year? We have fivedowns. Okay, I got

0:19:59.160 --> 0:20:06.040
<v Speaker 1>thirteen steak so ober here, Yeah, Okay, no, not serve it.

0:20:06.119 --> 0:20:08.719
<v Speaker 1>Just keep it in the back of your brain. So

0:20:08.800 --> 0:20:10.679
<v Speaker 1>if this doesn't happen, what are you gonna give us?

0:20:12.160 --> 0:20:14.119
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I don't know. But what am I

0:20:14.119 --> 0:20:16.840
<v Speaker 1>supposed to give you? Make something funner? He's gonna take

0:20:16.840 --> 0:20:18.879
<v Speaker 1>it fun He's gonna take us all out to dinner.

0:20:19.000 --> 0:20:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Like I don't do that all way to him? No,

0:20:20.520 --> 0:20:23.520
<v Speaker 1>I know, but yeah, but I'm thinking like, Indy, Yeah,

0:20:23.560 --> 0:20:25.800
<v Speaker 1>that's that's my birthday? Did you say that was? Okay?

0:20:25.840 --> 0:20:27.800
<v Speaker 1>We'll go out to dinner and but we won't know

0:20:27.880 --> 0:20:30.320
<v Speaker 1>then if if if he actually won't, if he has,

0:20:30.800 --> 0:20:34.120
<v Speaker 1>then you'll be paying for my Saint Elmo? Well yeah,

0:20:34.359 --> 0:20:37.000
<v Speaker 1>is that is that? An Indie's the saying Elmo Steakhouse?

0:20:37.040 --> 0:20:40.080
<v Speaker 1>A right? Good? So so wait wait wait so if

0:20:40.119 --> 0:20:43.720
<v Speaker 1>he has three by then do you pay for my steak? No? No?

0:20:43.880 --> 0:20:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Why not? Like this can't be a one sided bet.

0:20:47.280 --> 0:20:49.000
<v Speaker 1>We'll figure it out. We'll figure it all right, all right?

0:20:49.359 --> 0:20:53.919
<v Speaker 1>So crazy predictions for this game? Do you feel that

0:20:53.960 --> 0:20:57.920
<v Speaker 1>will make somewhat of a crazy play and impact this

0:20:57.960 --> 0:21:04.640
<v Speaker 1>game in a positive way for the Cowboys? Uh? Somebody

0:21:04.680 --> 0:21:08.600
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys are gonna get on the interception Ledger this week.

0:21:08.920 --> 0:21:13.080
<v Speaker 1>That's the protection for the Seahawks is too bad. Russell

0:21:13.119 --> 0:21:16.359
<v Speaker 1>Wilson's gonna get hit too many times for him to

0:21:16.520 --> 0:21:19.200
<v Speaker 1>play a completely clean game. I think he's thrown picks

0:21:19.200 --> 0:21:21.720
<v Speaker 1>in both of their games so far. Yeah, he threw

0:21:21.760 --> 0:21:24.240
<v Speaker 1>the pick that ended the Bears game, and he definitely

0:21:24.240 --> 0:21:28.240
<v Speaker 1>got picked in Denver as well. So uh yeah, the

0:21:28.280 --> 0:21:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys are gonna get a pick. If I had to

0:21:30.080 --> 0:21:35.919
<v Speaker 1>put money on it, I would say, obviously, Jeff you

0:21:36.200 --> 0:21:38.960
<v Speaker 1>somebody step up and dethrone him. Then, I mean the

0:21:39.000 --> 0:21:40.760
<v Speaker 1>guys led the team and picks three years in a

0:21:41.160 --> 0:21:45.640
<v Speaker 1>four years in a row, right since fifteen? No, that's

0:21:45.640 --> 0:21:48.440
<v Speaker 1>only three. Sorry, I can't count um either way. I

0:21:48.480 --> 0:21:50.720
<v Speaker 1>would guess Jeff Heath, but maybe Bayern r Cheeto. But

0:21:51.400 --> 0:21:54.800
<v Speaker 1>somebody's somebody's getting a pick and it'll be a big play.

0:21:54.960 --> 0:22:00.119
<v Speaker 1>Can the Cowboys score more points in this game than

0:22:00.160 --> 0:22:04.919
<v Speaker 1>the Seahawks or I mean again, we talked to about

0:22:04.960 --> 0:22:09.520
<v Speaker 1>this um maybe yesterday, I don't know, but that Seattle.

0:22:09.560 --> 0:22:12.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, yes, they've lost games, but they haven't really

0:22:12.840 --> 0:22:17.000
<v Speaker 1>had issues with scoring points. And based on the still

0:22:17.000 --> 0:22:19.520
<v Speaker 1>early but based on these two first games, I feel

0:22:19.560 --> 0:22:22.479
<v Speaker 1>more confident with the with Seattle being able to score

0:22:22.840 --> 0:22:25.600
<v Speaker 1>than the Cowboys so far, I don't. Here's the reason why,

0:22:25.600 --> 0:22:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Because I think the Cowboys defense is better than the

0:22:28.840 --> 0:22:32.720
<v Speaker 1>defenses that Seattle's face so far, and so I don't.

0:22:32.760 --> 0:22:35.800
<v Speaker 1>I expect both offenses to struggle. I don't. And here's

0:22:35.840 --> 0:22:38.040
<v Speaker 1>the deal. When I say struggle, I think the Cowboys

0:22:38.080 --> 0:22:40.200
<v Speaker 1>offense will actually play better this week than they've played

0:22:40.240 --> 0:22:41.919
<v Speaker 1>the first two weeks, because I think Zeke will be

0:22:41.920 --> 0:22:44.119
<v Speaker 1>better um and I think because they'll be able to

0:22:44.119 --> 0:22:46.840
<v Speaker 1>get the running game going to some degree that will

0:22:46.880 --> 0:22:50.000
<v Speaker 1>help them and help their offense throughout the game. So

0:22:50.040 --> 0:22:52.000
<v Speaker 1>I actually expect this to be a week where Zeke

0:22:52.040 --> 0:22:54.120
<v Speaker 1>goes of one hundred yards. You look at his history.

0:22:55.000 --> 0:22:57.040
<v Speaker 1>First two weeks is usually when he's not that great.

0:22:57.359 --> 0:22:59.679
<v Speaker 1>Gets to the third week, that's usually when Zeke comes on.

0:22:59.720 --> 0:23:01.920
<v Speaker 1>And I expect Zeke is gonna come on this week,

0:23:01.960 --> 0:23:04.080
<v Speaker 1>and I think he's gonna have a good week. I

0:23:04.119 --> 0:23:06.000
<v Speaker 1>still don't think the Cowboys are gonna score a ton

0:23:06.000 --> 0:23:07.399
<v Speaker 1>of points. I don't think they're gonna get into the

0:23:07.400 --> 0:23:09.679
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven range, but I wouldn't be surprised her up

0:23:09.680 --> 0:23:12.320
<v Speaker 1>at the twenty one range. Twenty four range maybe at

0:23:12.320 --> 0:23:14.959
<v Speaker 1>the most, but I think that's gonna be enough if

0:23:15.000 --> 0:23:17.000
<v Speaker 1>you look at it, because I just think that I

0:23:17.080 --> 0:23:19.640
<v Speaker 1>think that both these defenses are gonna be pretty good.

0:23:19.680 --> 0:23:21.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Dave broke it down for you to defense

0:23:21.640 --> 0:23:24.280
<v Speaker 1>just say. Seattle's defense isn't bad. They're just not at Colt.

0:23:24.400 --> 0:23:26.760
<v Speaker 1>They're just not where we are accustomed to seeing them,

0:23:26.800 --> 0:23:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Like they don't have the talent that they once had,

0:23:28.920 --> 0:23:31.639
<v Speaker 1>but they still Any defense has got difference makers at

0:23:31.680 --> 0:23:33.320
<v Speaker 1>all three levels, is gonna be a good defense, and

0:23:33.359 --> 0:23:35.240
<v Speaker 1>they do. They have difference makers at all three levels.

0:23:35.280 --> 0:23:37.040
<v Speaker 1>So it's gonna be tough for both teams to score.

0:23:37.040 --> 0:23:39.080
<v Speaker 1>I think I would guess it's gonna look a lot

0:23:39.119 --> 0:23:42.440
<v Speaker 1>like the last two games, which twenty fifteen Seattle one

0:23:42.560 --> 0:23:45.479
<v Speaker 1>thirteen to twelve and twenty seventeen Seattle one twenty one

0:23:45.520 --> 0:23:48.200
<v Speaker 1>to twelve, and one of Seattle's touchdowns was a pick six,

0:23:48.320 --> 0:23:51.320
<v Speaker 1>so their offense wasn't on fire by any stretch. I

0:23:51.320 --> 0:23:53.600
<v Speaker 1>think it's gonna be a lot like that. Like I

0:23:53.600 --> 0:23:55.600
<v Speaker 1>would be shocked if the winner of this game has

0:23:56.800 --> 0:23:58.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty is about as hard at high as I'm willing

0:23:58.800 --> 0:24:00.320
<v Speaker 1>to go. But I really think the score will be

0:24:00.320 --> 0:24:04.400
<v Speaker 1>more like seventeen to fifty fourteen, you know, sixteen to thirteen,

0:24:04.520 --> 0:24:06.600
<v Speaker 1>something like that. I certainly could see that. I think

0:24:06.600 --> 0:24:08.600
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be. I just think the defenses are better.

0:24:08.680 --> 0:24:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Both the two defenses are better than the offense. Hopefully

0:24:11.320 --> 0:24:13.199
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys can get in the end zone because they

0:24:13.240 --> 0:24:16.240
<v Speaker 1>have not in those last two games. Yea, all field goals,

0:24:16.680 --> 0:24:20.240
<v Speaker 1>but that problem. But that defense, those defenses they face,

0:24:20.320 --> 0:24:22.280
<v Speaker 1>those two usual much better than the defense they're going

0:24:22.280 --> 0:24:25.359
<v Speaker 1>to face the Sunday. Absolutely, well, let's hope you're right, Derek.

0:24:26.920 --> 0:24:29.959
<v Speaker 1>Let's take a call from Tony in Denver. All right,

0:24:29.960 --> 0:24:32.880
<v Speaker 1>how's it going, guys? Hey, what's up? Hey? I enjoy

0:24:32.960 --> 0:24:36.240
<v Speaker 1>the show. And as fans do, we dare start to

0:24:36.359 --> 0:24:40.920
<v Speaker 1>use the term doomsday defense again. And I think we've

0:24:40.920 --> 0:24:45.040
<v Speaker 1>finished number eight and defense overall last year. And should

0:24:45.080 --> 0:24:48.359
<v Speaker 1>we have vander esh play more in this game against

0:24:48.400 --> 0:24:54.159
<v Speaker 1>Russell Wilson then Damien Wilson, that's a that's an interesting thought.

0:24:54.400 --> 0:24:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Uh yeah, Damian Wilson. I know you missed that tackle

0:24:58.040 --> 0:25:01.439
<v Speaker 1>in Carolina, but I think that game, again Eli was

0:25:01.680 --> 0:25:04.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe the best he's ever played. But um, I get

0:25:04.840 --> 0:25:08.359
<v Speaker 1>your point. I mean Layton vander Esch, Him and Jalen

0:25:08.400 --> 0:25:11.359
<v Speaker 1>Smith are your most athletic linebackers purely just from a

0:25:11.400 --> 0:25:14.399
<v Speaker 1>talent standpoint. Um, I guarantee you they're going to get

0:25:14.440 --> 0:25:17.840
<v Speaker 1>him on the field. I don't I don't know what

0:25:18.040 --> 0:25:21.320
<v Speaker 1>if you spy him. I'm curious about that. You mentioned

0:25:21.359 --> 0:25:24.439
<v Speaker 1>Chris Rohard, like, are they gonna just blitz Russell Wilson

0:25:24.440 --> 0:25:26.760
<v Speaker 1>a ton knowing that if it doesn't work, they're screwed,

0:25:26.840 --> 0:25:30.879
<v Speaker 1>Because that sounds scary to me, whether he just beats

0:25:30.880 --> 0:25:33.679
<v Speaker 1>the blitz with a throw or escapes from the blitz

0:25:33.680 --> 0:25:35.399
<v Speaker 1>and then you got nobody to account. Well, there are

0:25:35.480 --> 0:25:38.040
<v Speaker 1>ways to to blitz in a way where you keep

0:25:38.080 --> 0:25:40.960
<v Speaker 1>maintaining you're the gap in your you're laying integrity, and

0:25:41.000 --> 0:25:44.320
<v Speaker 1>they're still not giving him escape routes. Right, that's the

0:25:44.320 --> 0:25:46.200
<v Speaker 1>whole point. If you can do that without giving him

0:25:46.280 --> 0:25:49.199
<v Speaker 1>escape routes, that's what you want to do. It's risky,

0:25:49.640 --> 0:25:51.360
<v Speaker 1>but I think there are ways to do it where

0:25:51.400 --> 0:25:53.919
<v Speaker 1>you can you can have both. You can blitz and

0:25:54.000 --> 0:25:55.760
<v Speaker 1>keep him from getting outside of the pocket. To answer

0:25:55.800 --> 0:25:59.160
<v Speaker 1>the question more directly, I think Damien has played well

0:25:59.280 --> 0:26:01.480
<v Speaker 1>enough that I would have expect he's your starting Sam

0:26:01.600 --> 0:26:04.040
<v Speaker 1>still but I know that they want to get vander

0:26:04.160 --> 0:26:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Esch snaps, and I bet you he will get fifteen

0:26:06.960 --> 0:26:11.640
<v Speaker 1>to twenty. It's my guess. Definitely not a bad problem

0:26:11.680 --> 0:26:14.600
<v Speaker 1>to how No, it's so it's really good. Still can't

0:26:14.600 --> 0:26:17.399
<v Speaker 1>believe that we're talking about this, like how do you

0:26:17.440 --> 0:26:20.280
<v Speaker 1>get all these linebackers onto the field? Like I remember

0:26:20.400 --> 0:26:23.359
<v Speaker 1>years where it was like, who's this guy they signed?

0:26:23.400 --> 0:26:26.159
<v Speaker 1>Like last year I think it was, or maybe it

0:26:26.200 --> 0:26:28.560
<v Speaker 1>was twenty sixteen, like they had to move Keith Smith

0:26:28.720 --> 0:26:31.400
<v Speaker 1>back to the linebacker because they didn't have enough. They

0:26:31.400 --> 0:26:33.919
<v Speaker 1>were like, hey, you still remember how to do that? Right, Well,

0:26:34.119 --> 0:26:36.600
<v Speaker 1>we have nobody left, so can you get over there. Yeah,

0:26:36.840 --> 0:26:40.160
<v Speaker 1>So that's pretty cool that they're just absolutely stacked at linebacker,

0:26:40.240 --> 0:26:42.240
<v Speaker 1>right and everybody and all of them are playing well.

0:26:42.280 --> 0:26:43.719
<v Speaker 1>That's the thing about it too. It's not just they

0:26:43.760 --> 0:26:45.880
<v Speaker 1>got bodies, like, they got guys that are playing really

0:26:45.920 --> 0:26:48.199
<v Speaker 1>well and you're having to really like the fact that

0:26:48.200 --> 0:26:50.040
<v Speaker 1>they're not having to put the first round pick on

0:26:50.080 --> 0:26:52.639
<v Speaker 1>the field. That's all. I mean, that's just I know,

0:26:52.880 --> 0:26:57.040
<v Speaker 1>such great like people. I get it, you get drafted nineteenth. Overall,

0:26:57.600 --> 0:26:59.440
<v Speaker 1>people want to see you play. People expect you to

0:26:59.440 --> 0:27:02.199
<v Speaker 1>make a different But that's not the worst thing in

0:27:02.240 --> 0:27:04.880
<v Speaker 1>the world. No, And most times, especially at that position too,

0:27:05.119 --> 0:27:07.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, where it takes a little more time to

0:27:08.040 --> 0:27:10.960
<v Speaker 1>get going and figure out the game. But most teams

0:27:10.960 --> 0:27:13.439
<v Speaker 1>aren't patient enough for that. Most teams they get their

0:27:13.440 --> 0:27:15.320
<v Speaker 1>first round pick and they want the first round to

0:27:15.320 --> 0:27:17.480
<v Speaker 1>pick on the field well and the fact that they've

0:27:17.520 --> 0:27:20.560
<v Speaker 1>got guys who were here that are playing well enough

0:27:20.600 --> 0:27:22.080
<v Speaker 1>for them to feel like they don't have to force

0:27:22.160 --> 0:27:26.320
<v Speaker 1>him on the field. Your first under pick usually unless

0:27:26.320 --> 0:27:28.920
<v Speaker 1>you do something you know, bold like draft of Pat

0:27:28.920 --> 0:27:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Mahomes when you have Alex Smith, like, usually your first

0:27:31.840 --> 0:27:33.520
<v Speaker 1>round pick is at a position where you don't have

0:27:33.560 --> 0:27:35.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of EI one. Yeah, but you know, Joe

0:27:36.000 --> 0:27:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Thomas even you know, I think people thought that was

0:27:38.080 --> 0:27:40.520
<v Speaker 1>a good signing in the spring, but who's even exceeded

0:27:40.520 --> 0:27:45.280
<v Speaker 1>those expectations. Jalen Smith is clearly just shooting right up

0:27:45.280 --> 0:27:47.120
<v Speaker 1>like a rocket. I mean, yeah, but let's be real.

0:27:47.280 --> 0:27:49.159
<v Speaker 1>That first round pick for the Cowboys last year was

0:27:49.200 --> 0:27:52.280
<v Speaker 1>an insurance pick, yes, because they didn't know if Jane

0:27:52.320 --> 0:27:54.040
<v Speaker 1>would be back to being himself. They didn't know what

0:27:54.040 --> 0:27:56.520
<v Speaker 1>was gonna happen with Sean and his injuries, and so

0:27:56.760 --> 0:27:58.879
<v Speaker 1>that was an insurance pick and it paid off on

0:27:58.920 --> 0:28:01.040
<v Speaker 1>him because now he really is insurance. I said it

0:28:01.119 --> 0:28:03.720
<v Speaker 1>in August when people were killing the guy for not practicing,

0:28:03.760 --> 0:28:06.240
<v Speaker 1>like you're gonna need him before the season's over, because

0:28:06.240 --> 0:28:08.879
<v Speaker 1>somebody's gonna get hurt. Knock on wood, and you're gonna

0:28:08.920 --> 0:28:12.840
<v Speaker 1>need him in the coming years because Shawn Lee's thirty two,

0:28:13.040 --> 0:28:16.000
<v Speaker 1>right and has an injury history of a fifty five

0:28:16.080 --> 0:28:19.120
<v Speaker 1>year old. Flights al really popping off. Yeah, and exactly

0:28:19.160 --> 0:28:22.520
<v Speaker 1>like going into third week cramp, it's a cramp. Layton

0:28:22.560 --> 0:28:27.280
<v Speaker 1>vanderessh is fine, Like he's gonna be fine. Um, I

0:28:27.359 --> 0:28:30.480
<v Speaker 1>was gonna say something, Oh, Damien Wilson, you know, Surprisingly

0:28:30.560 --> 0:28:33.480
<v Speaker 1>to me, I honestly did not expect him to be

0:28:33.640 --> 0:28:36.960
<v Speaker 1>playing as good he has been so far coming into

0:28:37.000 --> 0:28:38.920
<v Speaker 1>this year. I don't know why. It's just he's been

0:28:39.080 --> 0:28:42.400
<v Speaker 1>because he hadn't been very good his career. I don't

0:28:42.440 --> 0:28:44.560
<v Speaker 1>want to say his career has been disappointing, because if

0:28:44.560 --> 0:28:46.680
<v Speaker 1>you're still on the roster as a fourth round pick

0:28:46.720 --> 0:28:50.080
<v Speaker 1>in your contract year, you've been pretty good. But I

0:28:50.120 --> 0:28:52.760
<v Speaker 1>always think he gets compared to Anthony Hitchins so much

0:28:52.840 --> 0:28:56.680
<v Speaker 1>because from the same conference, same you know round, same

0:28:56.720 --> 0:28:59.640
<v Speaker 1>position obviously, and he hasn't been anywhere near as good

0:28:59.640 --> 0:29:04.600
<v Speaker 1>as hitch right, And yeah, no, I I going into

0:29:04.680 --> 0:29:06.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, when they drafted Vanderash and signed Thomas, I

0:29:07.000 --> 0:29:09.320
<v Speaker 1>was like, oh, it's not a lot. Damien Wilson makes

0:29:09.360 --> 0:29:12.400
<v Speaker 1>this team. So kudos to him that he's Yeah, I

0:29:12.440 --> 0:29:14.560
<v Speaker 1>really thought he'd be gone by now, and he's you know,

0:29:14.760 --> 0:29:17.840
<v Speaker 1>people dogged Kyle wilburto, but Damian Wilson is one of

0:29:17.840 --> 0:29:20.960
<v Speaker 1>your key special teamers too. It's a contract you're for him, yes,

0:29:21.120 --> 0:29:24.080
<v Speaker 1>because fifteen sixteen say yeah, yes, So this is his

0:29:24.120 --> 0:29:26.760
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to do like Hitchens and make some money. I

0:29:26.800 --> 0:29:28.960
<v Speaker 1>don't think he's gonna do like Hitchens, right, but what

0:29:28.960 --> 0:29:31.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying that that's his opportunity, right, that's his opportunity

0:29:31.520 --> 0:29:34.320
<v Speaker 1>for a second contract, which will be far bigger than

0:29:34.320 --> 0:29:36.360
<v Speaker 1>the one he's on right now, even if it's not huge.

0:29:36.480 --> 0:29:39.240
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, let's take our final break and when we

0:29:39.320 --> 0:29:41.760
<v Speaker 1>come back, we'll give our final score for this game,

0:29:41.800 --> 0:29:45.200
<v Speaker 1>and we'll keep taking more calls. Cowboys fans know that

0:29:45.280 --> 0:29:47.800
<v Speaker 1>the second best of anything simply won't cut it, and

0:29:47.840 --> 0:29:50.360
<v Speaker 1>your skincare should be no Different, a long time locker

0:29:50.400 --> 0:29:53.120
<v Speaker 1>room favorite of the players and the official men's skincare

0:29:53.160 --> 0:29:56.280
<v Speaker 1>brand of the Dallas Cowboys. Dallas based Jack Black is

0:29:56.280 --> 0:29:58.720
<v Speaker 1>the number one best selling men's skincare brand in the

0:29:58.760 --> 0:30:01.640
<v Speaker 1>country because we make products that help guys look, smell,

0:30:01.720 --> 0:30:04.720
<v Speaker 1>and feel better. Visit get Jack Black dot com slash

0:30:04.720 --> 0:30:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys to get ten dollars off your first order of

0:30:07.000 --> 0:30:10.360
<v Speaker 1>fifty dollars or more. Jack Black Look Good, Smell good,

0:30:10.600 --> 0:30:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Feel good, official men skincare brand of the Dallas Cowboys.

0:30:13.960 --> 0:30:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Star Sports Tours is the only official fan travel partner

0:30:17.280 --> 0:30:21.200
<v Speaker 1>of the Dallas Cowboys, offering exclusive game weekend travel packages

0:30:21.320 --> 0:30:24.880
<v Speaker 1>with sideline access and photo ops with current players, alumni

0:30:24.880 --> 0:30:27.440
<v Speaker 1>and cheerleaders. That's not all, though, You'll get to talk

0:30:27.600 --> 0:30:30.240
<v Speaker 1>x's and os with Senior Director of Player Personnel Will

0:30:30.320 --> 0:30:33.520
<v Speaker 1>McClay and of course with yours truly, me, Brian broad Us.

0:30:33.720 --> 0:30:35.880
<v Speaker 1>You can trust the official fan travel partner of the

0:30:35.960 --> 0:30:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys, and with us you'll travel like a pro.

0:30:38.880 --> 0:30:42.400
<v Speaker 1>Visit Cowboys Travel dot com to book your travel package today.

0:30:42.920 --> 0:30:44.920
<v Speaker 1>Before there was a draft. You get sized up at

0:30:44.920 --> 0:30:48.280
<v Speaker 1>cowboy by three simple factors. Decrease at his hat, the

0:30:48.320 --> 0:30:51.320
<v Speaker 1>bend of his brim and his unbending attitude a man,

0:30:51.360 --> 0:30:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Stetson didn't just protect him from what life through at him.

0:30:54.400 --> 0:30:59.120
<v Speaker 1>It projected a rugged, unstoppable spirit. Stetson hats are still American,

0:30:59.200 --> 0:31:02.080
<v Speaker 1>made with pride. Right here in Texas, there's still the

0:31:02.200 --> 0:31:06.040
<v Speaker 1>unofficial crowd of all self respecting Cowboys, and Stetson is

0:31:06.040 --> 0:31:08.840
<v Speaker 1>proud to be on the field with America's team. Find

0:31:08.880 --> 0:31:12.240
<v Speaker 1>a retailer nearest to you at Stetson dot com slash Cowboys.

0:31:12.680 --> 0:31:15.000
<v Speaker 1>What does it mean to be a Dallas Cowboys fan?

0:31:15.400 --> 0:31:17.600
<v Speaker 1>It means you've got the passion and the heart to

0:31:17.680 --> 0:31:20.760
<v Speaker 1>do your part supporting the Boys no matter what. That's

0:31:20.840 --> 0:31:23.560
<v Speaker 1>why when the game's on the line, you're on your feet,

0:31:23.640 --> 0:31:26.400
<v Speaker 1>whether you're at home or in the stands. Actually, you're

0:31:26.440 --> 0:31:29.440
<v Speaker 1>more than a fan. You are a member of Cowboys Nation,

0:31:29.640 --> 0:31:32.480
<v Speaker 1>and so is AT and T doing their part to

0:31:32.560 --> 0:31:36.719
<v Speaker 1>keep you connected to America's team all season law AT

0:31:36.960 --> 0:31:41.280
<v Speaker 1>and T is a proud member of Cowboys Nation. Back

0:31:41.680 --> 0:31:45.320
<v Speaker 1>to the brink, all right, Derek, tell me about some underwear.

0:31:46.880 --> 0:31:49.280
<v Speaker 1>It's been nice to get a heads up. Did you

0:31:49.360 --> 0:31:51.680
<v Speaker 1>know this? You need to get some Tommy John underwear.

0:31:51.720 --> 0:31:54.640
<v Speaker 1>They're the best underwear ever. They make you feel like

0:31:54.640 --> 0:31:59.400
<v Speaker 1>you're wearing nothing at all, agreathable and comfortable, good stuff,

0:31:59.440 --> 0:32:01.920
<v Speaker 1>and it's good stuff. It really is good stuff. So

0:32:02.040 --> 0:32:04.000
<v Speaker 1>take my word on this one. Go get some Tommy

0:32:04.040 --> 0:32:06.240
<v Speaker 1>John what's the what's the eat with the Where can

0:32:06.280 --> 0:32:08.880
<v Speaker 1>they find that online? Tommy John dot com Forward slash

0:32:08.960 --> 0:32:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys for twenty percent off your first order. Tommy John

0:32:12.320 --> 0:32:16.280
<v Speaker 1>dot com Ford doing a sleven one. I'm I'm saving mine.

0:32:16.760 --> 0:32:18.880
<v Speaker 1>I have this week because we got a four hour flight,

0:32:18.960 --> 0:32:20.760
<v Speaker 1>so I'm trying to become Now I have two so

0:32:20.800 --> 0:32:22.640
<v Speaker 1>I can I can wear them both. I will one

0:32:22.680 --> 0:32:26.160
<v Speaker 1>of them smart, No, yes, but I'll wear one up

0:32:26.240 --> 0:32:28.080
<v Speaker 1>and one back. I'm not gonna do like Dave and

0:32:28.120 --> 0:32:30.160
<v Speaker 1>like flip them over and wear one up and then

0:32:30.240 --> 0:32:32.440
<v Speaker 1>flipped and were I haven't done that. That's not gonna

0:32:32.440 --> 0:32:36.120
<v Speaker 1>be a god like make sure to wash it before

0:32:36.160 --> 0:32:37.800
<v Speaker 1>you wear it. Why do you have to watch? Why? No,

0:32:37.920 --> 0:32:39.440
<v Speaker 1>I didn't do that. I don't know. I always do.

0:32:39.680 --> 0:32:42.120
<v Speaker 1>That's a girlfriend. My wife always says. That's like whenever

0:32:42.200 --> 0:32:46.000
<v Speaker 1>brought I don't rip the tags off those bad boys on.

0:32:46.400 --> 0:32:49.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm gone for that. I'm good. I'm good, Okay, that's

0:32:49.760 --> 0:32:54.160
<v Speaker 1>why you're always crashing. Just get it. I'm getting those

0:32:54.200 --> 0:32:59.640
<v Speaker 1>a joke. I'm not seen that I'm gonna need that

0:32:59.680 --> 0:33:09.280
<v Speaker 1>in writing. All right, let's take a call from in

0:33:09.360 --> 0:33:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Las Vegas. Hey, everybody, Hey, you know, I guess to

0:33:16.000 --> 0:33:18.720
<v Speaker 1>score a lot of points, you got to take chances.

0:33:18.880 --> 0:33:23.080
<v Speaker 1>And I see Thako Mayfield last night, and the one

0:33:23.080 --> 0:33:25.320
<v Speaker 1>thing I like about that kid is he just lets

0:33:25.320 --> 0:33:28.800
<v Speaker 1>it go. He sees it and his brain tells his

0:33:29.000 --> 0:33:31.520
<v Speaker 1>arm and the balls out and it's moving. And I

0:33:31.520 --> 0:33:34.560
<v Speaker 1>don't see that with Dak. I see Dak he's like

0:33:34.600 --> 0:33:36.560
<v Speaker 1>a little gunshot. And I don't know if that's started

0:33:36.680 --> 0:33:40.360
<v Speaker 1>from Atlanta last year, but when he rose the quick slant,

0:33:40.440 --> 0:33:42.720
<v Speaker 1>that's his best throw because there's no thinking. He gets

0:33:42.760 --> 0:33:45.920
<v Speaker 1>it and he fires it. But anything that's down the field,

0:33:45.960 --> 0:33:49.440
<v Speaker 1>he's so afraid to make a mistake that when he

0:33:49.560 --> 0:33:52.719
<v Speaker 1>finally decides, you see him throat in a dirty rushes it.

0:33:53.040 --> 0:33:56.800
<v Speaker 1>So my question to you guys is would you rather

0:33:56.880 --> 0:34:01.000
<v Speaker 1>have Dak be like this, protect the ball but you're

0:34:01.040 --> 0:34:06.120
<v Speaker 1>one holding penalty away from maybe punting because this team

0:34:06.160 --> 0:34:10.399
<v Speaker 1>has a hard time overcoming first and twenty, or would

0:34:10.440 --> 0:34:13.600
<v Speaker 1>you like to see him take more chances let the

0:34:13.640 --> 0:34:16.719
<v Speaker 1>ball go. But he may throw some more interceptions, But

0:34:16.760 --> 0:34:19.360
<v Speaker 1>you got a shot at making bigger plays. What do

0:34:19.400 --> 0:34:21.279
<v Speaker 1>you guys think? Let me ask you this question. I

0:34:21.280 --> 0:34:24.560
<v Speaker 1>want you to kind of walk through this yourself. What

0:34:24.680 --> 0:34:27.919
<v Speaker 1>is what do the Cowboys do best? Run the ball,

0:34:28.080 --> 0:34:32.160
<v Speaker 1>run the ball? Which of those passing strategies works best?

0:34:32.200 --> 0:34:38.840
<v Speaker 1>If you're a good running team. Ah, that's tough because

0:34:41.160 --> 0:34:42.960
<v Speaker 1>if this if you're if you were going to tell

0:34:42.960 --> 0:34:45.680
<v Speaker 1>me that this team could methodically march down the field

0:34:45.719 --> 0:34:50.239
<v Speaker 1>and not get a penalty, I say, just checking it down.

0:34:50.800 --> 0:34:53.880
<v Speaker 1>But the problem is, I don't think the offensive line

0:34:54.200 --> 0:34:57.560
<v Speaker 1>is as good as it was and we've seen so far,

0:34:57.680 --> 0:34:59.560
<v Speaker 1>especially in the first game. Is you get this team

0:34:59.719 --> 0:35:03.239
<v Speaker 1>just one holding penalty, one offside penalty and they backed

0:35:03.320 --> 0:35:06.520
<v Speaker 1>up first of fifteen, They're going to have a hard

0:35:06.520 --> 0:35:11.480
<v Speaker 1>time overcoming that. So if he I may personally, I

0:35:11.520 --> 0:35:14.160
<v Speaker 1>think you have to stretch the field like they did

0:35:14.160 --> 0:35:16.560
<v Speaker 1>against the Giant. I think he needs to take some shot.

0:35:16.960 --> 0:35:20.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't mind him thrown an interception once in a while.

0:35:20.200 --> 0:35:22.799
<v Speaker 1>You know, if he's going to throw me a forty

0:35:22.840 --> 0:35:25.600
<v Speaker 1>yard pass down the middle of the field or something

0:35:25.640 --> 0:35:27.480
<v Speaker 1>like that, I'll take it. I took it at Romo,

0:35:28.120 --> 0:35:30.520
<v Speaker 1>and you know you knew Romo. How great is he

0:35:30.600 --> 0:35:32.160
<v Speaker 1>was throwing a ball? He was going to throw them

0:35:32.160 --> 0:35:34.400
<v Speaker 1>in a suctions all the great quarterbacks do because they

0:35:34.440 --> 0:35:37.520
<v Speaker 1>take chances. I think in this league they're begging you

0:35:37.920 --> 0:35:41.120
<v Speaker 1>to take chances with the rules and everything, and I

0:35:41.160 --> 0:35:43.960
<v Speaker 1>just think you're asking the office and you're asking a

0:35:44.040 --> 0:35:47.759
<v Speaker 1>defense to be so precise. Just trying to work these

0:35:47.760 --> 0:35:51.960
<v Speaker 1>twelve play drives. I don't think he could win consistently.

0:35:52.360 --> 0:35:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Were you okay with the idea that? Were you okay

0:35:55.120 --> 0:35:57.480
<v Speaker 1>with this last game? From the standpoint the frequency of

0:35:57.520 --> 0:36:01.480
<v Speaker 1>the downfill throws? They had three that were, to my opinion,

0:36:01.600 --> 0:36:04.399
<v Speaker 1>kind of what I call downfield throws last week. They

0:36:04.440 --> 0:36:05.920
<v Speaker 1>hit on one of them, So they connect on one

0:36:05.960 --> 0:36:08.799
<v Speaker 1>on one of three, and when you're going down feel

0:36:08.840 --> 0:36:11.160
<v Speaker 1>like that that's probably going to be the frequency. Maybe

0:36:11.160 --> 0:36:13.320
<v Speaker 1>a little higher percentage, but that's probably gonna be the

0:36:13.360 --> 0:36:15.719
<v Speaker 1>frequency with which you catch those. Were you okay with

0:36:15.760 --> 0:36:18.560
<v Speaker 1>that frequency of doing it three, three or four times

0:36:18.560 --> 0:36:23.480
<v Speaker 1>a game? Yes? I think you got to back them off.

0:36:24.120 --> 0:36:27.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's there's no mystery. Every defense is saying,

0:36:27.560 --> 0:36:30.359
<v Speaker 1>we got to stop Zeke I mean the safety Land

0:36:30.360 --> 0:36:32.920
<v Speaker 1>of College came right out and said it's there's no mystery,

0:36:32.920 --> 0:36:35.120
<v Speaker 1>and that back them off. And I think in the

0:36:35.160 --> 0:36:36.880
<v Speaker 1>long run, you may not hit it. We didn't hit

0:36:36.920 --> 0:36:39.319
<v Speaker 1>it like you said, we hit one. But if they

0:36:39.360 --> 0:36:41.279
<v Speaker 1>back up a few steps, maybe that opens up a

0:36:41.320 --> 0:36:44.040
<v Speaker 1>little more room to zeke. You know. I just think

0:36:44.040 --> 0:36:47.880
<v Speaker 1>in this league, if you're gonna think and dunk, I

0:36:47.880 --> 0:36:50.160
<v Speaker 1>don't think it can work. Okay, I said, it's just

0:36:50.200 --> 0:36:52.920
<v Speaker 1>too much, too much overcoming, there's a penalty. I appreciate

0:36:52.960 --> 0:36:55.640
<v Speaker 1>the call, and I actually I think kind of in

0:36:55.719 --> 0:36:57.640
<v Speaker 1>listening to him talk about that and talk through it,

0:36:57.680 --> 0:36:59.600
<v Speaker 1>I think the answer is really in what he was saying,

0:36:59.640 --> 0:37:01.200
<v Speaker 1>which is as you got to do a little bit

0:37:01.200 --> 0:37:03.720
<v Speaker 1>of both. You're not gonna go out and bombs away

0:37:03.719 --> 0:37:05.760
<v Speaker 1>every play. You get three or four of those a game,

0:37:06.120 --> 0:37:07.640
<v Speaker 1>and then the rest of the game you run the ball,

0:37:08.200 --> 0:37:10.480
<v Speaker 1>drop it off down low. I mean, there's there are

0:37:10.480 --> 0:37:13.279
<v Speaker 1>different ways you want to attack a defense, and just

0:37:13.440 --> 0:37:15.399
<v Speaker 1>going deep the whole game isn't the right answer because

0:37:15.400 --> 0:37:17.320
<v Speaker 1>you're not gonna get enough percentage. You will be punting

0:37:17.320 --> 0:37:19.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot, right because that's only a fifty fifty prospect

0:37:20.000 --> 0:37:22.680
<v Speaker 1>in most instances, right, So you really want to have

0:37:22.719 --> 0:37:25.920
<v Speaker 1>a balance of it. And I think, honestly, three or

0:37:25.920 --> 0:37:27.759
<v Speaker 1>four times a game, to me, it's plenty to go

0:37:27.840 --> 0:37:30.080
<v Speaker 1>downfield it especially if you connect on one of them

0:37:30.080 --> 0:37:32.400
<v Speaker 1>and it's a touchdown. That's going to force a defense

0:37:32.400 --> 0:37:34.359
<v Speaker 1>to really think twice about whether they're willing to give

0:37:34.520 --> 0:37:36.759
<v Speaker 1>that one play out of out of the three, and

0:37:36.800 --> 0:37:38.440
<v Speaker 1>that may keep them back a little bit or at

0:37:38.520 --> 0:37:40.600
<v Speaker 1>least make them hesitate a little bit on a run

0:37:40.640 --> 0:37:42.240
<v Speaker 1>and give Zeke a little bit more of a headstart

0:37:42.280 --> 0:37:44.960
<v Speaker 1>before he gets to that second level. Yeah, I think

0:37:45.480 --> 0:37:48.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm officially ready to say, like we make too much

0:37:48.200 --> 0:37:51.560
<v Speaker 1>of a deal out of the down field passing. And

0:37:51.640 --> 0:37:54.080
<v Speaker 1>when I said, I mean like thirty fourty yards down field,

0:37:54.120 --> 0:37:55.719
<v Speaker 1>like you're gonna take a few of those a game.

0:37:56.560 --> 0:38:00.040
<v Speaker 1>Maybe like Ben Roethlisberger hits them with more frequency and

0:38:00.280 --> 0:38:02.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people, but like he's going to the

0:38:02.120 --> 0:38:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Hall of Fame and he's got a receivers probably the

0:38:04.680 --> 0:38:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Hall to back a defense off when you have a

0:38:07.200 --> 0:38:09.479
<v Speaker 1>run game like this, I really think it's as easy

0:38:09.520 --> 0:38:15.040
<v Speaker 1>as like consistently hitting receivers for first downs like eight, ten, twelve,

0:38:15.160 --> 0:38:18.759
<v Speaker 1>fifteen yards down field, like I you know, I'm not.

0:38:18.760 --> 0:38:20.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't have issue with the call because I honestly

0:38:20.760 --> 0:38:23.960
<v Speaker 1>think Rob made a few really good points. But we

0:38:24.120 --> 0:38:27.520
<v Speaker 1>did see this work in twenty sixteen, like it worked

0:38:27.840 --> 0:38:30.960
<v Speaker 1>really well, like they put those drives together, and he's

0:38:31.000 --> 0:38:33.839
<v Speaker 1>absolutely right. The offensive line was better, the running game

0:38:33.880 --> 0:38:37.640
<v Speaker 1>was better, Dak was better to this point, and I

0:38:37.680 --> 0:38:39.960
<v Speaker 1>think the Cowboys are in the process of trying to

0:38:40.000 --> 0:38:42.239
<v Speaker 1>figure out how they get back to that. I don't

0:38:42.239 --> 0:38:43.640
<v Speaker 1>know if they can do it with this personnel. I

0:38:43.680 --> 0:38:46.080
<v Speaker 1>don't know if the receivers are good enough to scare anybody.

0:38:46.400 --> 0:38:49.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if Dak can make those plays. I

0:38:49.239 --> 0:38:51.759
<v Speaker 1>don't know if the offensive line without Frederick and from

0:38:51.760 --> 0:38:53.680
<v Speaker 1>what we've seen from them so far, can get to

0:38:53.760 --> 0:38:57.319
<v Speaker 1>that level. But that's what they're going to try to

0:38:57.320 --> 0:38:59.680
<v Speaker 1>do because that's the way they've built this team, And honestly,

0:39:00.040 --> 0:39:02.480
<v Speaker 1>with the way this team is built right now, I

0:39:02.520 --> 0:39:04.920
<v Speaker 1>would rather just not turn the ball over and it

0:39:04.960 --> 0:39:07.880
<v Speaker 1>probably won't be exciting, sorry about it, but that is

0:39:07.920 --> 0:39:10.440
<v Speaker 1>the way they've built this team. You've got a good

0:39:10.480 --> 0:39:12.360
<v Speaker 1>enough defense that it can keep you in and maybe

0:39:12.360 --> 0:39:14.640
<v Speaker 1>even win some games if your quarterback doesn't turn the

0:39:14.640 --> 0:39:17.759
<v Speaker 1>ball over. That's a pretty good formula for success. It

0:39:17.800 --> 0:39:21.200
<v Speaker 1>won't be sexy. I'm sorry, but that's probably the best

0:39:21.200 --> 0:39:23.480
<v Speaker 1>strategy for this team to win games. I'll take a

0:39:23.520 --> 0:39:25.840
<v Speaker 1>game like last week for the rest of the season

0:39:25.880 --> 0:39:29.960
<v Speaker 1>every single week if they're winning. Honestly, yea, And the

0:39:30.040 --> 0:39:32.120
<v Speaker 1>last week wasn't a beautiful thing to watch. They had

0:39:32.120 --> 0:39:34.080
<v Speaker 1>a couple of moments that were really beautiful to watch,

0:39:34.280 --> 0:39:36.080
<v Speaker 1>but by and large, that was one of those games

0:39:36.120 --> 0:39:38.439
<v Speaker 1>and it was kind of ugly and kind of like

0:39:38.800 --> 0:39:40.239
<v Speaker 1>you felt like they were I mean, you knew they

0:39:40.280 --> 0:39:42.520
<v Speaker 1>were winning, but you felt like it was kind of tenuous,

0:39:42.560 --> 0:39:44.040
<v Speaker 1>and you really didn't know whether they were gonna be

0:39:44.080 --> 0:39:46.160
<v Speaker 1>able to maintain it, especially once you got into the

0:39:46.200 --> 0:39:48.400
<v Speaker 1>second and third quarter and then an offense really wasn't

0:39:48.600 --> 0:39:50.919
<v Speaker 1>scoring at that point. But the fact of the matter

0:39:51.040 --> 0:39:53.560
<v Speaker 1>is the way they played that game. They came out aggressive,

0:39:53.680 --> 0:39:56.440
<v Speaker 1>they got to lead, the defense held, and then they

0:39:56.440 --> 0:39:58.000
<v Speaker 1>got to the fourth quarter and they said, let's put

0:39:58.000 --> 0:39:59.640
<v Speaker 1>this game away, and they put the game away. If

0:39:59.680 --> 0:40:01.239
<v Speaker 1>you had that formula every week and you have the

0:40:01.239 --> 0:40:04.000
<v Speaker 1>personnel to do it, that's a winning formula. We're seeing

0:40:04.000 --> 0:40:05.799
<v Speaker 1>that formula go to the Super Bowl. If that's a

0:40:05.840 --> 0:40:09.399
<v Speaker 1>winning formula, and if you're a college football fan Alabama,

0:40:09.440 --> 0:40:11.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean exactly, It's hard to play that way in

0:40:11.560 --> 0:40:14.840
<v Speaker 1>the NFL because Alabama has such a ridiculous talent advantage.

0:40:14.920 --> 0:40:18.640
<v Speaker 1>But that's the formula and it can work. Yep, It's

0:40:18.760 --> 0:40:21.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna be tough because but it can work. And like

0:40:21.400 --> 0:40:23.200
<v Speaker 1>I said, that's that's the way this team is built

0:40:23.239 --> 0:40:24.799
<v Speaker 1>right now and when you will run it. The good

0:40:24.800 --> 0:40:28.440
<v Speaker 1>thing about that is there will only be one formula

0:40:28.480 --> 0:40:30.920
<v Speaker 1>in my opinion, that would that would harm you if

0:40:30.920 --> 0:40:32.880
<v Speaker 1>you're doing that, and you do if you do that well,

0:40:33.120 --> 0:40:37.280
<v Speaker 1>and that is the super quarterback. If you're playing Aaron Rodgers,

0:40:37.320 --> 0:40:40.880
<v Speaker 1>if you're playing Drew Brees, if you're playing Tom Brady.

0:40:41.120 --> 0:40:43.640
<v Speaker 1>But they're only a handful of those, right those are

0:40:43.680 --> 0:40:45.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna be the only teams that are really gonna if

0:40:45.120 --> 0:40:46.600
<v Speaker 1>you can do that well, if you can play really

0:40:46.600 --> 0:40:49.040
<v Speaker 1>really great defense, you can run the ball really well

0:40:49.120 --> 0:40:51.560
<v Speaker 1>and you don't turn over the ball, only those great

0:40:51.600 --> 0:40:54.200
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks will really have a great shot at beating you.

0:40:54.520 --> 0:40:56.920
<v Speaker 1>And I'll take my chances with that. That's a pretty

0:40:56.960 --> 0:40:59.239
<v Speaker 1>good that's a pretty good setup to say, Hey, if

0:40:59.280 --> 0:41:00.959
<v Speaker 1>that's the only people I can beat us. If those

0:41:01.000 --> 0:41:03.000
<v Speaker 1>four or five can beat us and everybody else, we

0:41:03.040 --> 0:41:05.839
<v Speaker 1>fact we can beat That's what's a that's what're taking.

0:41:05.880 --> 0:41:07.759
<v Speaker 1>That's a shot we're taking, no doubt about it. And

0:41:07.800 --> 0:41:10.600
<v Speaker 1>I really don't know how long it would take for

0:41:10.840 --> 0:41:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Dad to get to that level as far as being

0:41:13.000 --> 0:41:17.239
<v Speaker 1>able to make those long distance throws, especially giving the

0:41:17.800 --> 0:41:21.080
<v Speaker 1>amount of opportunities that he gets in the game. I mean,

0:41:21.239 --> 0:41:25.239
<v Speaker 1>you can't really see great progress when you don't get

0:41:25.280 --> 0:41:27.239
<v Speaker 1>many chances. But didn't need progress from what he did.

0:41:27.280 --> 0:41:29.680
<v Speaker 1>I think what he did last week was no, it

0:41:29.760 --> 0:41:32.759
<v Speaker 1>is fine, It is fine, and moving it slowly like that,

0:41:33.080 --> 0:41:34.719
<v Speaker 1>as long as you get it moving and get to

0:41:34.800 --> 0:41:37.239
<v Speaker 1>the no. I'm saying what he did last week as

0:41:37.280 --> 0:41:39.239
<v Speaker 1>far as the deep now, yes, it was fine because

0:41:39.360 --> 0:41:42.240
<v Speaker 1>one of me connected four touchdown. The other two didn't connect,

0:41:42.239 --> 0:41:43.719
<v Speaker 1>and that's going to be the percentage you do when

0:41:43.719 --> 0:41:47.000
<v Speaker 1>you're going that far downfield. But the thing is, Okay,

0:41:47.080 --> 0:41:49.839
<v Speaker 1>he's not consistent enough. And like you said, okay, yes,

0:41:49.880 --> 0:41:52.879
<v Speaker 1>that's fine when you're making those few ones here and there.

0:41:53.000 --> 0:41:55.480
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time, I think it can affect

0:41:55.520 --> 0:41:59.000
<v Speaker 1>his confidence and start giving him that more of that

0:41:59.040 --> 0:42:02.640
<v Speaker 1>hesitation that we've been seeing of like thinking, Okay, should

0:42:02.640 --> 0:42:04.759
<v Speaker 1>I make this this throw or not. I think it

0:42:04.800 --> 0:42:09.000
<v Speaker 1>affects him in his confidence and the way and how

0:42:09.080 --> 0:42:12.879
<v Speaker 1>quickly he executes. I don't know. I think quarterbacks know that.

0:42:13.400 --> 0:42:15.640
<v Speaker 1>They call it a fifty fifty ball for a reason.

0:42:15.760 --> 0:42:17.759
<v Speaker 1>I think quarterbacks, no, you're not going to connect that

0:42:18.120 --> 0:42:20.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot, Like that's not if that's your bread and butter,

0:42:20.760 --> 0:42:23.399
<v Speaker 1>unless you're the Greatest Show on Turf where they were

0:42:23.400 --> 0:42:25.960
<v Speaker 1>doing that every week multiple times in the game. Then

0:42:26.000 --> 0:42:28.640
<v Speaker 1>that's just not the way the offense runs, I mean,

0:42:28.840 --> 0:42:30.919
<v Speaker 1>and that certainly is not the way the offense runs here.

0:42:31.000 --> 0:42:33.040
<v Speaker 1>That's not what they're even asking him to do. So

0:42:33.080 --> 0:42:35.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that affects his confidence as much as

0:42:35.120 --> 0:42:37.480
<v Speaker 1>it is just we're gonna take a shot here, and

0:42:37.960 --> 0:42:40.400
<v Speaker 1>there is still value in the shot, Like even if

0:42:40.440 --> 0:42:43.040
<v Speaker 1>you don't connect, the fact that you got somebody down

0:42:43.160 --> 0:42:45.960
<v Speaker 1>feel and the fact that Dak threw the ball forces

0:42:45.960 --> 0:42:49.440
<v Speaker 1>a defense to think they're gonna hesitate for justice. Staff second,

0:42:49.520 --> 0:42:51.680
<v Speaker 1>thinking are they going deep here. We gotta make sure

0:42:51.680 --> 0:42:53.800
<v Speaker 1>we'recovering that. We gotta make sure we got people in position.

0:42:54.120 --> 0:42:55.600
<v Speaker 1>So that's all you have to worry about it, and

0:42:55.680 --> 0:42:57.480
<v Speaker 1>for me, that's that's the value of it. I don't

0:42:57.480 --> 0:43:00.960
<v Speaker 1>think that everything else is working. That's those the defense

0:43:01.080 --> 0:43:03.080
<v Speaker 1>is working. As long as able to run the ball

0:43:03.200 --> 0:43:04.640
<v Speaker 1>and as long as you turn it over. I think

0:43:04.640 --> 0:43:06.359
<v Speaker 1>those are the three critical factors. And if you can

0:43:06.360 --> 0:43:08.520
<v Speaker 1>do those things, I think the deep ball becomes just

0:43:08.600 --> 0:43:10.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of that added thing just to force them to

0:43:10.360 --> 0:43:14.319
<v Speaker 1>respect it. You know, I absolutely agree. Just when those

0:43:14.360 --> 0:43:17.439
<v Speaker 1>other elements are working, then you got a great game going.

0:43:17.640 --> 0:43:20.880
<v Speaker 1>But if one of those goes down, then everything else

0:43:21.040 --> 0:43:24.000
<v Speaker 1>goes down. And we've seen that happen multiple times. So

0:43:24.800 --> 0:43:27.399
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I think Dad can be fine, but

0:43:28.840 --> 0:43:32.719
<v Speaker 1>we'll see, we'll see how it's just a we'll see.

0:43:32.880 --> 0:43:35.920
<v Speaker 1>He's yeah, absolutely, we haven't. I mean, I can't sit

0:43:35.960 --> 0:43:37.480
<v Speaker 1>here and tell you that Dak is going to develop

0:43:37.520 --> 0:43:41.160
<v Speaker 1>into an all pro quarterback. But this is this is

0:43:41.160 --> 0:43:42.600
<v Speaker 1>the way this team is going to have to win

0:43:42.960 --> 0:43:46.840
<v Speaker 1>right now, and that's that's what's important today on Friday,

0:43:47.520 --> 0:43:51.640
<v Speaker 1>and not mess those Rico passes in the end zone

0:43:51.719 --> 0:43:54.840
<v Speaker 1>he's getting down. We're picking this game or what are

0:43:54.880 --> 0:43:57.400
<v Speaker 1>we okay, final score for this game? Who wins? And

0:43:57.400 --> 0:44:00.759
<v Speaker 1>what is the final score? All right, Um we go first, Yeah,

0:44:00.960 --> 0:44:04.319
<v Speaker 1>all right. I think Cowboys win. I think they win

0:44:04.360 --> 0:44:08.399
<v Speaker 1>twenty to sixteen in a close one. In another game,

0:44:08.440 --> 0:44:10.440
<v Speaker 1>it's just like the Giants game. That's I think that's

0:44:10.440 --> 0:44:11.920
<v Speaker 1>what we're gonna have to get used to seeing. I

0:44:11.920 --> 0:44:13.960
<v Speaker 1>do think they put up a couple more points, and

0:44:14.000 --> 0:44:16.120
<v Speaker 1>I think the offense looks a little more efficient throughout

0:44:16.120 --> 0:44:17.480
<v Speaker 1>the game, because I think the running game is going

0:44:17.520 --> 0:44:19.719
<v Speaker 1>to be much better this week than it has been

0:44:19.960 --> 0:44:22.840
<v Speaker 1>the first two weeks, so it'll look a little better,

0:44:23.160 --> 0:44:24.960
<v Speaker 1>but the result will still be pretty much the same.

0:44:24.960 --> 0:44:26.880
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna be right there around twenty points. In my opinion,

0:44:26.880 --> 0:44:30.359
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys will win. I said before a week one that

0:44:30.560 --> 0:44:32.400
<v Speaker 1>I was going to choose to believe a lot of

0:44:32.400 --> 0:44:36.200
<v Speaker 1>things about this team. The defense has it looks good.

0:44:36.239 --> 0:44:40.000
<v Speaker 1>The offense not so much. Not enough time has passed

0:44:40.160 --> 0:44:42.760
<v Speaker 1>from week one. There's not a large enough sample size

0:44:42.760 --> 0:44:45.359
<v Speaker 1>of success for me to have a ton of faith

0:44:45.400 --> 0:44:48.879
<v Speaker 1>in this offense. Seattle's offense has problems of their own.

0:44:49.400 --> 0:44:51.359
<v Speaker 1>At the end of the day, they have an all

0:44:51.400 --> 0:44:54.719
<v Speaker 1>Pro quarterback. It hasn't been pretty for him, but he's

0:44:54.719 --> 0:44:57.120
<v Speaker 1>still there. A lot of those guys are gone, but

0:44:57.160 --> 0:44:59.520
<v Speaker 1>this is still a franchise with a great home field

0:44:59.520 --> 0:45:02.160
<v Speaker 1>advantage that knows how to win games and is used

0:45:02.160 --> 0:45:05.839
<v Speaker 1>to winning games. There's a lot of pride up there. Um.

0:45:05.920 --> 0:45:08.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's gonna be pretty at all for anybody, really,

0:45:08.640 --> 0:45:11.280
<v Speaker 1>but I just think an Owen two Seattle team finds

0:45:11.280 --> 0:45:13.560
<v Speaker 1>a way to keep it season alive. I'm thinking, like,

0:45:14.080 --> 0:45:15.600
<v Speaker 1>I thought that was a must win when you were

0:45:15.600 --> 0:45:18.799
<v Speaker 1>onto one to get it wasn't. It was a must

0:45:18.840 --> 0:45:20.680
<v Speaker 1>win for Dallas, and this is a must win for

0:45:20.719 --> 0:45:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Seattle and three and oh and two? Right, but oh,

0:45:24.120 --> 0:45:29.120
<v Speaker 1>I meant not that are we doing this right now?

0:45:29.960 --> 0:45:32.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm just getting clarity. I'm just getting clarity. They like

0:45:32.280 --> 0:45:34.279
<v Speaker 1>they needed to win that game and they didn't, But

0:45:34.800 --> 0:45:37.480
<v Speaker 1>now it's must If it's only twenty twenty percent of

0:45:37.480 --> 0:45:39.640
<v Speaker 1>teams making it Owen two, it's even fewer at three

0:45:39.719 --> 0:45:45.000
<v Speaker 1>out about it. Um, I think Seattle wins fourteen to thirteen,

0:45:45.160 --> 0:45:49.240
<v Speaker 1>fourteen thirteen. All right, an game. It won't be fun.

0:45:49.400 --> 0:45:52.279
<v Speaker 1>It will not be fun, but it'll be defensive, be

0:45:52.320 --> 0:45:56.279
<v Speaker 1>a fun trip home, it'll be. It'll be. Yeah, it's

0:45:56.320 --> 0:45:59.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna be it's gonna be a slugfest. I think it'll

0:45:59.200 --> 0:46:00.839
<v Speaker 1>it'll find a way to be entertaining. But I think

0:46:00.840 --> 0:46:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Seattle gets it done. All right, Um, I will I'm

0:46:04.600 --> 0:46:09.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna pick Seattle as well. I will say under twenty

0:46:09.239 --> 0:46:11.520
<v Speaker 1>that's the final score. I don't know what it would be,

0:46:11.600 --> 0:46:13.439
<v Speaker 1>but I would just say it's gonna be a one

0:46:13.480 --> 0:46:17.399
<v Speaker 1>point difference for this game. So wa difference? Yeah, one

0:46:17.440 --> 0:46:22.600
<v Speaker 1>point doesn't matter, doesn't Now it's gonna be thirty eight

0:46:22.640 --> 0:46:25.560
<v Speaker 1>thirty five. That would be fun. Yeah, for real, Dax

0:46:25.680 --> 0:46:29.359
<v Speaker 1>is gonna be splinging it around. Hey, I don't mind

0:46:29.400 --> 0:46:32.040
<v Speaker 1>that I bring it. Bring I'd be happy to eat

0:46:32.080 --> 0:46:34.640
<v Speaker 1>some crow. That's what I want to do, all right.

0:46:34.640 --> 0:46:37.640
<v Speaker 1>For Derek Eagleton, David Hillman, remember your seat. This has

0:46:37.640 --> 0:46:41.239
<v Speaker 1>been the Break on Dallas Cowboys dot Com Radio. This

0:46:41.280 --> 0:46:44.080
<v Speaker 1>has been a production of Dallas Cowboys dot Com and

0:46:44.200 --> 0:46:46.040
<v Speaker 1>the Dallas Cowboys Football Club.