WEBVTT - Harvey Endangered World's Most Important Chemical

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg P and L Podcast. I'm Pim Fox.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Bramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether you're at the grocery store

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg P M L

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:32.519
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot Com. In

0:00:32.600 --> 0:00:35.720
<v Speaker 1>the wake of Hurricane Harvey, we've talked a lot about

0:00:35.840 --> 0:00:40.599
<v Speaker 1>gasoline prices spiking, crude values falling. But there's another chemical

0:00:40.960 --> 0:00:45.640
<v Speaker 1>that is big produced, big production in Texas, and uh

0:00:45.720 --> 0:00:48.760
<v Speaker 1>it possibly could be more important. I'm talking about ethylene,

0:00:48.800 --> 0:00:51.480
<v Speaker 1>and I want to bring in Jack Caskey, who highlighted

0:00:51.520 --> 0:00:53.800
<v Speaker 1>this in a recent Bloomberg News story. He's our chemical

0:00:54.040 --> 0:00:57.200
<v Speaker 1>company's reporter and he is based in Houston. Also, I

0:00:57.240 --> 0:01:00.480
<v Speaker 1>want to bring in Jason Minor, senior global chemical analyst

0:01:00.520 --> 0:01:04.520
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg Intelligence based in Princeton, New Jersey. Jack, let's

0:01:04.520 --> 0:01:07.080
<v Speaker 1>start with you. Can you give us a sense of

0:01:07.120 --> 0:01:11.120
<v Speaker 1>the importance of this chemical that you highlighted, ethylene, and

0:01:11.240 --> 0:01:15.080
<v Speaker 1>why the production of this chemical in Texas could be

0:01:15.360 --> 0:01:18.759
<v Speaker 1>a bigger impact on what we consume every day than

0:01:18.800 --> 0:01:25.080
<v Speaker 1>even gas prices. Yeah, lista UM ethylene is the world

0:01:25.240 --> 0:01:30.399
<v Speaker 1>most produced petrochemical. Uh. It's in everything. It's in plastics

0:01:30.480 --> 0:01:34.399
<v Speaker 1>or food packaging, your toys, it's entires and diapers and

0:01:34.840 --> 0:01:38.199
<v Speaker 1>pretty much anything I thinks they don't even think about.

0:01:38.200 --> 0:01:42.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, rubber, Uh contains athletes anthetic rubber. UM. The

0:01:42.360 --> 0:01:47.000
<v Speaker 1>list is hundreds, if not thousands of products long. Uh,

0:01:47.640 --> 0:01:52.440
<v Speaker 1>it's converted into you know, vinyls um. It's it's likely

0:01:52.520 --> 0:01:54.280
<v Speaker 1>said plastics. I'm not going to go to the whole list,

0:01:54.320 --> 0:01:59.120
<v Speaker 1>but it is the core of the petrochemical industry. Right.

0:01:59.160 --> 0:02:02.440
<v Speaker 1>If it's the core of the petro chemical industry, Jason,

0:02:02.560 --> 0:02:04.880
<v Speaker 1>I would like you to come in and comment on this.

0:02:05.240 --> 0:02:07.520
<v Speaker 1>How long, what kind of time frame, and what are

0:02:07.560 --> 0:02:10.840
<v Speaker 1>some of the specific challenges that are going to be

0:02:10.880 --> 0:02:14.160
<v Speaker 1>faced by the industry to get it up and running. Yeah,

0:02:14.160 --> 0:02:17.320
<v Speaker 1>they're there. Thanks. There's a couple of effects here actually

0:02:17.440 --> 0:02:21.079
<v Speaker 1>UM two waves perhaps so in the near term. The

0:02:21.200 --> 0:02:24.520
<v Speaker 1>estimates range between sort of forty and six of golf

0:02:24.520 --> 0:02:28.040
<v Speaker 1>ethylene being down. That's maybe a fifth the u S

0:02:28.080 --> 0:02:30.400
<v Speaker 1>maybe a fifth of the world's athlete supply. So the

0:02:30.480 --> 0:02:34.040
<v Speaker 1>numbers sound big, of course, depends how long the adages

0:02:34.080 --> 0:02:37.320
<v Speaker 1>are and remember, um, we haven't starved this industry for Capex,

0:02:37.400 --> 0:02:40.120
<v Speaker 1>There's been a lot of spending which is operating in

0:02:40.160 --> 0:02:43.160
<v Speaker 1>our favor. The second wave that might be more impactful

0:02:43.320 --> 0:02:47.120
<v Speaker 1>is logistics. Um, we did have a massive wave, so

0:02:47.200 --> 0:02:51.000
<v Speaker 1>ethylene first and biggest step it turns into plastic polyethylene.

0:02:51.400 --> 0:02:52.959
<v Speaker 1>That's that's where it becomes kind of the face of

0:02:52.960 --> 0:02:55.480
<v Speaker 1>petro chemicals. We use it every day. We had a

0:02:55.520 --> 0:02:58.400
<v Speaker 1>massive wave of expansion in the US coming in plastic

0:02:58.480 --> 0:03:01.160
<v Speaker 1>this year, and with that sort of coming over the

0:03:01.200 --> 0:03:03.440
<v Speaker 1>next twenty four months, you know, it's it's as much

0:03:03.440 --> 0:03:06.720
<v Speaker 1>as a quarter of additional capacity if those plants get

0:03:06.720 --> 0:03:09.679
<v Speaker 1>back online fast. The next wave would be that that

0:03:09.840 --> 0:03:12.480
<v Speaker 1>those pellets create sort of a local glut. They need

0:03:12.480 --> 0:03:15.720
<v Speaker 1>to be exported. And clearly if you look at on

0:03:15.760 --> 0:03:17.880
<v Speaker 1>the terminal, we have a nice map, real time map

0:03:17.880 --> 0:03:20.440
<v Speaker 1>of the ships in the gulf. There it's a big

0:03:20.440 --> 0:03:23.240
<v Speaker 1>parking lot, a lot of ships waiting, and the rail

0:03:23.240 --> 0:03:27.000
<v Speaker 1>washouts could be pretty significant as well. Jason, I'd love

0:03:27.000 --> 0:03:29.520
<v Speaker 1>to get your sense of why so much of the

0:03:29.520 --> 0:03:34.560
<v Speaker 1>production of ethylene is based in Texas. Energy energy, energy,

0:03:35.160 --> 0:03:39.160
<v Speaker 1>back to oil and then more recently shale gas and

0:03:39.160 --> 0:03:42.800
<v Speaker 1>and uh the wave of expansion. Really, the US because

0:03:42.800 --> 0:03:46.360
<v Speaker 1>of gale gas, has become the world's plastic and ethylene hub.

0:03:46.360 --> 0:03:49.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we're at a moment where since two thousand,

0:03:49.400 --> 0:03:52.320
<v Speaker 1>about a hundred and seventy nine billion of capex new

0:03:52.360 --> 0:03:55.320
<v Speaker 1>projects have been announced and it's all driven by our

0:03:55.480 --> 0:03:59.840
<v Speaker 1>very low cost position. And that's because of shale gas. So, uh,

0:04:00.160 --> 0:04:02.880
<v Speaker 1>the supplies right there, and then you can ship, of

0:04:02.920 --> 0:04:06.280
<v Speaker 1>course in good times from there quite effectively the rest

0:04:06.280 --> 0:04:10.320
<v Speaker 1>of the world jack the companies that are specifically involved.

0:04:10.320 --> 0:04:13.720
<v Speaker 1>We've seen pictures of the Archema plant and so on

0:04:14.120 --> 0:04:20.359
<v Speaker 1>owned by out non US uh enterprises. What what kind

0:04:20.360 --> 0:04:24.280
<v Speaker 1>of sort of new manufacturing or news you know, equipment

0:04:24.320 --> 0:04:26.360
<v Speaker 1>is going to be necessary because I mean, if the

0:04:26.440 --> 0:04:29.159
<v Speaker 1>motors of the electric motors are out, aren't they going

0:04:29.200 --> 0:04:33.920
<v Speaker 1>to require rewiring? Yeah, that can happen. I mean it's

0:04:33.960 --> 0:04:35.919
<v Speaker 1>really not going to be clear until they get in

0:04:35.920 --> 0:04:38.640
<v Speaker 1>there and trying start these plants up what the problems

0:04:38.680 --> 0:04:42.080
<v Speaker 1>are at any Yeah, electoral problems historically have been at

0:04:42.120 --> 0:04:47.400
<v Speaker 1>the laid plants startups for months in past storms. You know,

0:04:47.680 --> 0:04:50.960
<v Speaker 1>not commonly, but it does happen. Um. But yeah, water

0:04:51.360 --> 0:04:55.680
<v Speaker 1>who knows where the water gets when it's a flood situation. So, um,

0:04:55.720 --> 0:05:01.640
<v Speaker 1>there's I mean, and it's contaminated water. Correct, Well, brackish

0:05:01.680 --> 0:05:04.839
<v Speaker 1>water is corrosive if it's uh you know if on

0:05:04.960 --> 0:05:07.560
<v Speaker 1>these plants around the coast, so the water would be brackish.

0:05:07.760 --> 0:05:09.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that it's contaminated. It just has salt

0:05:09.880 --> 0:05:13.400
<v Speaker 1>in it, which is not good for metal. Jason, I'd

0:05:13.440 --> 0:05:15.320
<v Speaker 1>love to get your sense and whether there's a precedent

0:05:15.400 --> 0:05:20.080
<v Speaker 1>for this type of disruption in the ethylene production industry,

0:05:20.240 --> 0:05:24.280
<v Speaker 1>going back to Trina Rita were really the the big

0:05:24.279 --> 0:05:27.359
<v Speaker 1>precedent and um, you go back to two thousand and five.

0:05:27.440 --> 0:05:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Now what's interesting is these companies and let's remember doubt

0:05:30.560 --> 0:05:32.840
<v Speaker 1>you pot merged today, so what I'm about to say

0:05:32.920 --> 0:05:35.360
<v Speaker 1>is even more true. But these are behemoth companies with

0:05:35.400 --> 0:05:38.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of diversification. Um, when you go back to

0:05:38.440 --> 0:05:42.200
<v Speaker 1>the third quarterb oh five, um, Dow Chemical had only

0:05:42.360 --> 0:05:46.240
<v Speaker 1>a two negative impact on their volumes from the Katrina

0:05:46.279 --> 0:05:49.800
<v Speaker 1>and Arina Rita hurricanes. That just speaks to how hugely

0:05:49.800 --> 0:05:53.280
<v Speaker 1>diversity these companies are. But that's really the precedent. Um,

0:05:53.400 --> 0:05:56.560
<v Speaker 1>and again it kind of mutes what from an investor's perspective,

0:05:56.560 --> 0:05:59.520
<v Speaker 1>you might see uh, some of the company impacts, although

0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:02.880
<v Speaker 1>perhaps in chlor al kali maybe at old and UH

0:06:02.920 --> 0:06:05.680
<v Speaker 1>and maybe some of the industrial gases for the rebuilding

0:06:05.720 --> 0:06:08.440
<v Speaker 1>into thousand eighteen, the welding gases will see a little

0:06:08.440 --> 0:06:10.640
<v Speaker 1>bit of improvement in earnings from this. I want to

0:06:10.640 --> 0:06:13.159
<v Speaker 1>thank you both very much. Sorry, go ahead, Jack, you

0:06:13.200 --> 0:06:16.160
<v Speaker 1>got a final comment. Yeah, I was just going to

0:06:16.240 --> 0:06:18.960
<v Speaker 1>add that. Um. Some analyst Jeffreys in particular, is out

0:06:19.160 --> 0:06:22.320
<v Speaker 1>with a note this overnight saying, you know, it could

0:06:22.320 --> 0:06:26.560
<v Speaker 1>be until November until the petro chemical industry is you know,

0:06:26.600 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 1>reaches the pre hurricane level. So that's two months from now,

0:06:30.240 --> 0:06:33.719
<v Speaker 1>so that we could of course, nobody really knows, but

0:06:34.080 --> 0:06:37.640
<v Speaker 1>it could be a month long process. Here. Thanks very

0:06:37.720 --> 0:06:42.120
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us, gentlemen. Jason Miner, senior chemical global

0:06:42.160 --> 0:06:46.320
<v Speaker 1>chemicals analysts for Bloomberg Intelligence, and A Jackkaski here is

0:06:46.320 --> 0:06:50.440
<v Speaker 1>our chemical companies reporter for Bloomberg News. They're both reporting

0:06:50.520 --> 0:07:06.440
<v Speaker 1>from Houston. So it turns out pim fox that algorithms

0:07:06.480 --> 0:07:09.560
<v Speaker 1>get bored sometimes, uh, And it seems like perhaps in

0:07:09.640 --> 0:07:14.080
<v Speaker 1>this market where trading volumes are just sagging away, even

0:07:14.120 --> 0:07:17.600
<v Speaker 1>those computerized systems just can't seem to get their mojo back.

0:07:17.680 --> 0:07:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Matt Mainlee joins US now. He's managing director and equity

0:07:20.120 --> 0:07:23.440
<v Speaker 1>strategist at Miller, tay Back and Company. He is uh

0:07:23.720 --> 0:07:27.400
<v Speaker 1>speaking with us uh after writing a note earlier today

0:07:27.720 --> 0:07:29.400
<v Speaker 1>in which you say it's going to be a very

0:07:29.440 --> 0:07:33.400
<v Speaker 1>boring day in front of the long weekend. Um, you're right,

0:07:33.720 --> 0:07:36.440
<v Speaker 1>But I think that this is important because it's been

0:07:36.480 --> 0:07:38.520
<v Speaker 1>boring for a while and there have been these lulls

0:07:38.600 --> 0:07:40.800
<v Speaker 1>and the market has sort of either drifted along or

0:07:40.880 --> 0:07:44.200
<v Speaker 1>gone up. What do you see in your models that

0:07:44.560 --> 0:07:47.400
<v Speaker 1>is going to break this this sort of uh, this

0:07:47.480 --> 0:07:51.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of trend and push it in one direction or another. Well,

0:07:51.800 --> 0:07:54.200
<v Speaker 1>it's well, one thing is we we do have to

0:07:54.240 --> 0:07:57.080
<v Speaker 1>get past the kind of the late August adul drums

0:07:57.080 --> 0:07:59.600
<v Speaker 1>that we get every year, whether the Algals long before

0:07:59.600 --> 0:08:02.120
<v Speaker 1>the Apple were involved the markets that it's going to

0:08:02.160 --> 0:08:05.400
<v Speaker 1>be listless, uh, you know, late late in August. Uh.

0:08:05.440 --> 0:08:07.760
<v Speaker 1>So that's gonna be one thing. But more importantly, we're

0:08:07.760 --> 0:08:09.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to see what's gonna I think people you know,

0:08:09.840 --> 0:08:11.320
<v Speaker 1>there's gonna be a lot of focus. Of course, what's

0:08:11.320 --> 0:08:14.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna happen in Washington with the UH dead ceiling and

0:08:14.440 --> 0:08:17.240
<v Speaker 1>things like that. But we also have, of course, what

0:08:17.440 --> 0:08:20.640
<v Speaker 1>is the FED going to do on the UH, on

0:08:20.640 --> 0:08:23.200
<v Speaker 1>on drinking their balance sheet? And will that have an impact?

0:08:23.200 --> 0:08:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Because a lot of people are saying it's definitely gonna

0:08:25.160 --> 0:08:26.960
<v Speaker 1>do this, or it's definitely gonna do that, But we

0:08:27.120 --> 0:08:28.920
<v Speaker 1>but the most people and the smartest people. I think

0:08:28.920 --> 0:08:30.720
<v Speaker 1>you're saying, we don't really know what's gonna what had

0:08:30.720 --> 0:08:32.240
<v Speaker 1>happened with that. I think a lot of people are

0:08:32.240 --> 0:08:34.679
<v Speaker 1>sitting on our hands because of that. UM. That's an

0:08:34.679 --> 0:08:37.760
<v Speaker 1>interesting take, Matt, because when do you think that we're

0:08:37.800 --> 0:08:40.520
<v Speaker 1>actually going to get a sense of what the effect

0:08:40.559 --> 0:08:43.360
<v Speaker 1>will be? Because even if the FED announces some plan

0:08:43.440 --> 0:08:46.600
<v Speaker 1>and say September, which is the absolute earliest, and it's

0:08:46.600 --> 0:08:49.560
<v Speaker 1>more likely October, uh, we are going to see the

0:08:49.640 --> 0:08:53.680
<v Speaker 1>real impact for a while. Right, Well, yes, I mean

0:08:54.240 --> 0:08:57.160
<v Speaker 1>they can they We expect that they will tell us

0:08:57.200 --> 0:08:59.160
<v Speaker 1>when they're going to start doing. Some people say they

0:08:59.240 --> 0:09:01.720
<v Speaker 1>could start doing as early September, but I agree it's

0:09:01.760 --> 0:09:04.760
<v Speaker 1>something that that is probably gonna be October at the earliest. UM.

0:09:04.800 --> 0:09:07.559
<v Speaker 1>But there will be less liquidity in the system and

0:09:07.720 --> 0:09:11.080
<v Speaker 1>UH by definition, and people a little worried about that.

0:09:11.120 --> 0:09:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Now they're gonna go gradually, so that should be positive.

0:09:14.840 --> 0:09:16.360
<v Speaker 1>And I do think that the you know that the

0:09:16.400 --> 0:09:19.440
<v Speaker 1>market has uh, they've kind of signaled, and some of

0:09:19.440 --> 0:09:22.680
<v Speaker 1>these other global central bankers have been saying that if

0:09:22.720 --> 0:09:25.560
<v Speaker 1>things get majorlygue disrupted, though, they can step back on

0:09:25.600 --> 0:09:28.920
<v Speaker 1>the accelerator. But it's still it's been a key driver

0:09:29.040 --> 0:09:31.000
<v Speaker 1>to the markets in the last eight years. Not the

0:09:31.040 --> 0:09:33.560
<v Speaker 1>only driver, Bunny and stretch of the imagination. But with

0:09:33.559 --> 0:09:36.360
<v Speaker 1>with with liquidity going to be less plentiful, people are

0:09:36.400 --> 0:09:39.480
<v Speaker 1>worried about Matt. You're joining us from Boston, home to

0:09:39.520 --> 0:09:43.120
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg one six one Boston, Newburyport, as well as thirteen

0:09:43.200 --> 0:09:46.160
<v Speaker 1>thirty metro Western and the South Shore. And I want

0:09:46.160 --> 0:09:50.120
<v Speaker 1>trick thoughts on the biotech industry, which has a great

0:09:50.160 --> 0:09:53.199
<v Speaker 1>presence in the area. Bluebird Bio for example, these stocks,

0:09:53.240 --> 0:09:55.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, you look at them every day. We're Bio

0:09:55.559 --> 0:09:58.480
<v Speaker 1>up another four and a half percent, Biogen moves higher,

0:09:58.559 --> 0:10:02.440
<v Speaker 1>Vertex Pharmaceuticals. What is the biotech industry tell you about

0:10:02.480 --> 0:10:06.000
<v Speaker 1>the market, Well, it's it's it's certainly a bullish, uh

0:10:06.559 --> 0:10:08.920
<v Speaker 1>bullish move in this group. I mean, we turned a

0:10:08.960 --> 0:10:10.640
<v Speaker 1>positive on the group back in the in the spring,

0:10:10.640 --> 0:10:13.319
<v Speaker 1>back in March, uh, and it kind of moved sideways

0:10:13.320 --> 0:10:15.160
<v Speaker 1>for a while, but it broke out very nicely. And

0:10:15.440 --> 0:10:18.480
<v Speaker 1>on a technical basis, it's had this great move. Uh.

0:10:18.800 --> 0:10:21.040
<v Speaker 1>It made a double bottom in two thousand and sixteen,

0:10:21.360 --> 0:10:23.320
<v Speaker 1>and then this year, after a little bit of rally,

0:10:23.360 --> 0:10:25.319
<v Speaker 1>it's sold back off but held its two under day

0:10:25.360 --> 0:10:27.880
<v Speaker 1>moving average, and since then it's been making It's made

0:10:27.880 --> 0:10:30.400
<v Speaker 1>three higher high sense then, so it's very very bullish

0:10:30.400 --> 0:10:32.600
<v Speaker 1>on a technical basis. And one of the things though,

0:10:32.600 --> 0:10:35.120
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's gonna be very important because some

0:10:35.160 --> 0:10:37.400
<v Speaker 1>of the innovations there on the fundamental side, things look

0:10:37.520 --> 0:10:39.800
<v Speaker 1>very very good. But people a little bit worried. Geez,

0:10:39.840 --> 0:10:41.520
<v Speaker 1>will we get a repeat of what happened in two

0:10:41.559 --> 0:10:44.080
<v Speaker 1>thousand and fifteen when the group has been rolling very

0:10:44.160 --> 0:10:46.920
<v Speaker 1>very strongly, Hillary Clinton came out and made comments about

0:10:47.320 --> 0:10:50.160
<v Speaker 1>drug prices and the group basically crashed if it felt

0:10:50.280 --> 0:10:54.560
<v Speaker 1>three the differences. There's a much different set up this time.

0:10:54.800 --> 0:10:57.400
<v Speaker 1>In two thousand and fifteen, the group had rallied eighty

0:10:57.840 --> 0:11:02.079
<v Speaker 1>percent over the previous fifteen months and wildly outperformed the SMP,

0:11:02.360 --> 0:11:04.920
<v Speaker 1>which is only up about seventeen percent. Over that time frame.

0:11:05.200 --> 0:11:07.200
<v Speaker 1>So what it is that gave so many people a

0:11:07.360 --> 0:11:10.000
<v Speaker 1>huge amount of conference confidence to add leverage to their

0:11:10.360 --> 0:11:13.520
<v Speaker 1>to their positions. So when the group rolled over, Uh,

0:11:13.800 --> 0:11:16.680
<v Speaker 1>it became much worse than otherwise there should have have

0:11:16.880 --> 0:11:19.640
<v Speaker 1>because the fundamentals hadn't really changed, but people had to

0:11:19.720 --> 0:11:22.640
<v Speaker 1>unwind their leverage. There was forced selling, you know, margin

0:11:22.679 --> 0:11:25.280
<v Speaker 1>calls and things like that. Right now, this rally has

0:11:25.360 --> 0:11:27.640
<v Speaker 1>been very good, but it hasn't been anything more than

0:11:27.640 --> 0:11:30.760
<v Speaker 1>the the SMP has been. It's had percent rally along

0:11:30.800 --> 0:11:34.920
<v Speaker 1>with a percent rally and the SMP, so we don't

0:11:34.960 --> 0:11:37.360
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't have the same kind of leverage. So there's no

0:11:37.400 --> 0:11:39.520
<v Speaker 1>guarantee the stock of the group can't go down, especially

0:11:39.559 --> 0:11:42.600
<v Speaker 1>if the broader market corrects. But we don't have that

0:11:42.679 --> 0:11:44.839
<v Speaker 1>leverage in there, So I don't I strongly believe that

0:11:44.840 --> 0:11:46.960
<v Speaker 1>people don't have to worry about the same kind of

0:11:47.160 --> 0:11:49.680
<v Speaker 1>disaster taking place at this time around. Uh, if the

0:11:49.679 --> 0:11:51.600
<v Speaker 1>market sells off a little bit that took place at

0:11:51.679 --> 0:11:54.479
<v Speaker 1>night and in two thousand fifteen, Matt, what a specific

0:11:54.559 --> 0:11:56.679
<v Speaker 1>sector do you think is most at risk of a

0:11:56.760 --> 0:12:01.240
<v Speaker 1>sell off? Well, I mean, you know, it's funny because

0:12:01.280 --> 0:12:03.439
<v Speaker 1>the one thing that the people keep pointing to is

0:12:03.440 --> 0:12:06.400
<v Speaker 1>in the energy stocks and and and how oil could

0:12:06.600 --> 0:12:08.240
<v Speaker 1>dip back down and it took forty two and tests

0:12:08.240 --> 0:12:10.640
<v Speaker 1>forty two again or even drop into the thirties. But

0:12:10.720 --> 0:12:12.920
<v Speaker 1>that group is, you know, it is pretty washed out

0:12:12.960 --> 0:12:15.400
<v Speaker 1>and and and so I would not look for that group.

0:12:15.600 --> 0:12:17.680
<v Speaker 1>The one group that that I do get a little

0:12:17.679 --> 0:12:20.120
<v Speaker 1>bit worried about. Of course, as a technology sector, the

0:12:20.160 --> 0:12:25.080
<v Speaker 1>facts have just had this great amount of uh I'm sorry,

0:12:25.080 --> 0:12:29.160
<v Speaker 1>obviously the great run this year, but the stock semiconductor

0:12:29.240 --> 0:12:31.480
<v Speaker 1>endixes things stalling out a little bit lately, and that's

0:12:31.480 --> 0:12:34.880
<v Speaker 1>been a great leadership group within the technology sector. So

0:12:35.080 --> 0:12:37.680
<v Speaker 1>if we see a you know, a rolling over of

0:12:37.840 --> 0:12:40.600
<v Speaker 1>the tech stocks or the semiconductor stocks, uh, and then

0:12:40.640 --> 0:12:42.760
<v Speaker 1>of course the thank stocks lose any kind of momentum

0:12:42.800 --> 0:12:45.320
<v Speaker 1>again uh, that could lead to the kind of at

0:12:45.360 --> 0:12:47.800
<v Speaker 1>least minor unwinding of leverage that some people have added

0:12:47.800 --> 0:12:50.280
<v Speaker 1>to their portfolios recently. And again I'm not saying we'll

0:12:50.280 --> 0:12:52.280
<v Speaker 1>see a complete crash in the group like we saw

0:12:52.440 --> 0:12:54.880
<v Speaker 1>this in the biotechs a couple of years ago, but

0:12:54.960 --> 0:12:57.520
<v Speaker 1>it could, you know, could leave the group vulnerable. If so,

0:12:57.600 --> 0:12:59.560
<v Speaker 1>keep an eye on those semiconductor stocks more so than

0:12:59.600 --> 0:13:02.440
<v Speaker 1>the fang. As we move forward, Matt, we keep hearing

0:13:02.480 --> 0:13:07.680
<v Speaker 1>all about the valuation, in other words, how expensive stocks are,

0:13:07.760 --> 0:13:11.440
<v Speaker 1>at least on a relative basis. Does that make any

0:13:11.440 --> 0:13:15.160
<v Speaker 1>sense in a market like this, Well, on a long

0:13:15.280 --> 0:13:18.679
<v Speaker 1>term basis, you know, evaluations do matter. I mean, it's funny,

0:13:18.720 --> 0:13:22.360
<v Speaker 1>how uh you know? I guess my My key point

0:13:22.400 --> 0:13:24.240
<v Speaker 1>is that if you've you've got a lot in the

0:13:24.240 --> 0:13:26.440
<v Speaker 1>stock market, you've had a great run here, that's great.

0:13:26.480 --> 0:13:28.880
<v Speaker 1>But the one thing is that people say they're afraid

0:13:28.880 --> 0:13:31.840
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna move miss the next move. I mean, there's

0:13:31.840 --> 0:13:33.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of fear. And I can understand that with

0:13:33.200 --> 0:13:36.319
<v Speaker 1>institutional investors because they get measured on you know, every

0:13:36.440 --> 0:13:39.640
<v Speaker 1>quarter every year. But the individuals, it's like, hey, I've

0:13:39.640 --> 0:13:41.880
<v Speaker 1>had this great run since two thousand and nine, uh,

0:13:41.960 --> 0:13:44.800
<v Speaker 1>and do I really do I really have to worry

0:13:44.840 --> 0:13:47.200
<v Speaker 1>about missing the next five percent move? I guess. My

0:13:47.280 --> 0:13:49.839
<v Speaker 1>point is that on a long term basis, the market

0:13:49.880 --> 0:13:53.240
<v Speaker 1>should be fine, but most people do much better when

0:13:53.280 --> 0:13:56.800
<v Speaker 1>they're buying more when the market is inexpensive and cheap

0:13:57.280 --> 0:13:59.920
<v Speaker 1>and and oversold than they do when the market is

0:14:00.080 --> 0:14:02.720
<v Speaker 1>overbought and expensive, Like it is now. I mean there's

0:14:02.720 --> 0:14:05.240
<v Speaker 1>a reason that that the Warren Buffett has got his

0:14:05.240 --> 0:14:09.200
<v Speaker 1>biggest cast position ever he became a billionaire. But buying cheap,

0:14:09.320 --> 0:14:10.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying it out of the stock market many

0:14:10.960 --> 0:14:13.960
<v Speaker 1>stretch of imagination, but you have a little bit. There's

0:14:13.960 --> 0:14:15.640
<v Speaker 1>nothing wrong with taking a few chips off the table,

0:14:15.679 --> 0:14:18.560
<v Speaker 1>so you have something if and when the market does correct, Matt,

0:14:18.760 --> 0:14:20.760
<v Speaker 1>real quick, the dollar. Do you think this is the

0:14:20.800 --> 0:14:22.600
<v Speaker 1>year's biggest pain trade, that we're going to see a

0:14:22.640 --> 0:14:27.680
<v Speaker 1>strengthening against all of the current short positions. The potential

0:14:27.800 --> 0:14:30.760
<v Speaker 1>is definitely there. We have with the d s I,

0:14:30.840 --> 0:14:33.920
<v Speaker 1>which is a daily sentiment index, with UH which is

0:14:33.960 --> 0:14:37.280
<v Speaker 1>a sentiment indicator that's very low only temper cent bulls.

0:14:37.400 --> 0:14:40.000
<v Speaker 1>And then plus, as you mentioned, the positioning everybody short.

0:14:40.080 --> 0:14:42.720
<v Speaker 1>The thing was just the zact opposite of what we

0:14:42.720 --> 0:14:44.520
<v Speaker 1>saw at the beginning of the year when everybody was long.

0:14:44.760 --> 0:14:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Now everybody's short. I think the pain trade in the

0:14:46.880 --> 0:14:48.200
<v Speaker 1>last four months of the year could be to the

0:14:48.280 --> 0:14:50.520
<v Speaker 1>upside in the dollar. Thank you very much for being

0:14:50.520 --> 0:14:53.520
<v Speaker 1>with us, Matt Maine. He is managing director and equity

0:14:53.600 --> 0:14:57.520
<v Speaker 1>strategist for Miller tay Back, joining us from Boston. He's

0:14:57.560 --> 0:15:12.280
<v Speaker 1>on site at the Boston Convention and Exhibition Center. Can

0:15:12.400 --> 0:15:16.440
<v Speaker 1>President Trump get very rapid action from Congress on emergency

0:15:16.560 --> 0:15:19.520
<v Speaker 1>funding for Texas? Here to tell us more is our

0:15:19.560 --> 0:15:23.760
<v Speaker 1>senior White House correspondent, Margaret Talive. She joins us from Washington,

0:15:23.800 --> 0:15:27.080
<v Speaker 1>and you can follow Margaret on Twitter at Margaret Tala.

0:15:27.240 --> 0:15:30.520
<v Speaker 1>That's t a l e V. Alright, Margaret, So what

0:15:30.560 --> 0:15:33.720
<v Speaker 1>are the chances that the build or when Congress comes back,

0:15:33.720 --> 0:15:35.320
<v Speaker 1>that we get a bill that includes all of this

0:15:35.400 --> 0:15:39.080
<v Speaker 1>emergency funding. I think the chances are very good. I mean,

0:15:39.360 --> 0:15:42.160
<v Speaker 1>with the caveats that anything can happen, and as we've

0:15:42.200 --> 0:15:45.400
<v Speaker 1>seen time and time again, unexpected drama has become injected

0:15:45.400 --> 0:15:47.880
<v Speaker 1>in some of these events. But look um, from the

0:15:47.880 --> 0:15:51.280
<v Speaker 1>White House's perspective, there is a real desire to not

0:15:51.440 --> 0:15:54.400
<v Speaker 1>have a debt limit crisis at the end of September,

0:15:54.440 --> 0:15:56.720
<v Speaker 1>to not have a debt limit crisis or a default

0:15:56.720 --> 0:15:59.640
<v Speaker 1>situation that can affect markets and blow up plans for

0:15:59.720 --> 0:16:03.480
<v Speaker 1>a x CUB plan. There is also this parallel request

0:16:03.800 --> 0:16:07.240
<v Speaker 1>to have a real debate over the government spending bill,

0:16:08.000 --> 0:16:10.880
<v Speaker 1>including yes, the wall, even if that fight gets deferred,

0:16:10.880 --> 0:16:13.240
<v Speaker 1>and yes, the possibility of a shutdown, even if it's

0:16:13.320 --> 0:16:17.000
<v Speaker 1>temporary shutdown that some fiscal conservatives want to be able

0:16:17.120 --> 0:16:20.640
<v Speaker 1>to decouple those events is something they'd like to do,

0:16:20.840 --> 0:16:25.640
<v Speaker 1>and everybody across the spectrum within the Republican Party as

0:16:25.640 --> 0:16:28.720
<v Speaker 1>well as Democrats, understands the need and wants to support

0:16:28.760 --> 0:16:31.760
<v Speaker 1>the need UH to cover you know, FEMA's bills in

0:16:31.880 --> 0:16:33.840
<v Speaker 1>the next few weeks. So the money doesn't right now

0:16:33.880 --> 0:16:35.920
<v Speaker 1>before the end of the fiscal year. So linking the

0:16:35.960 --> 0:16:39.360
<v Speaker 1>two UH in theory could be risky if it denied

0:16:39.640 --> 0:16:43.200
<v Speaker 1>UM the emergency money. But I think the calculation at

0:16:43.200 --> 0:16:45.320
<v Speaker 1>this point is going to be that this will be

0:16:45.320 --> 0:16:47.960
<v Speaker 1>an offer that the lawmakers can't refuse, and it gives

0:16:47.960 --> 0:16:51.440
<v Speaker 1>the ones who have constituencies that would be troubled by

0:16:51.440 --> 0:16:54.000
<v Speaker 1>the debt failing increased clean um some cover to do it.

0:16:54.320 --> 0:16:58.880
<v Speaker 1>So basically, this is shaming the more conservative side of

0:16:59.000 --> 0:17:03.120
<v Speaker 1>the GOP into passing a bill that they might otherwise

0:17:03.160 --> 0:17:05.399
<v Speaker 1>feel uncomfortable with because they can't go back to their

0:17:05.400 --> 0:17:08.160
<v Speaker 1>constituents and say, yeah, I voted against helping all those

0:17:08.160 --> 0:17:10.480
<v Speaker 1>people who are now homeless, those thousands and thousands of

0:17:10.480 --> 0:17:13.040
<v Speaker 1>people in shelters. Yeah, you could look at it a shamming.

0:17:13.119 --> 0:17:15.320
<v Speaker 1>You could look at this as political cover. You also

0:17:15.320 --> 0:17:17.680
<v Speaker 1>could look at it as sort of a tacit. Uh

0:17:17.920 --> 0:17:21.560
<v Speaker 1>promised to let them have the fight over government spending,

0:17:21.840 --> 0:17:24.679
<v Speaker 1>just not to attach it to paying debts that are

0:17:24.720 --> 0:17:28.679
<v Speaker 1>already incurred. Margaret, You know, I was looking recently at

0:17:28.720 --> 0:17:35.440
<v Speaker 1>renderings of the border wall that the president has been

0:17:35.480 --> 0:17:39.600
<v Speaker 1>speaking about, and uh, this set aside the issue of

0:17:39.600 --> 0:17:41.320
<v Speaker 1>whether it's a good thing or bad thing for just

0:17:41.359 --> 0:17:44.520
<v Speaker 1>a moment. But it struck me that building a wall

0:17:44.840 --> 0:17:47.439
<v Speaker 1>might is it possible that we could build those kinds

0:17:47.480 --> 0:17:50.960
<v Speaker 1>of projects to prevent against future catastrophes or at least

0:17:51.119 --> 0:17:55.720
<v Speaker 1>mitigate against uh, this kind of catastrophic flooding. Oh, you

0:17:55.800 --> 0:17:58.840
<v Speaker 1>were talking about a two for that would be a

0:17:58.880 --> 0:18:03.280
<v Speaker 1>border wall construction and as an emergency management preventative tactics

0:18:03.280 --> 0:18:06.520
<v Speaker 1>gone into politics. Right, this is amazing Well, or at

0:18:06.560 --> 0:18:08.760
<v Speaker 1>least in other words, I mean to kind of shift

0:18:08.800 --> 0:18:11.359
<v Speaker 1>the well seriously, to shift the focus. I maybe because

0:18:11.400 --> 0:18:13.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we're facing the potential of another hurricane that

0:18:14.080 --> 0:18:18.520
<v Speaker 1>is forming in the Eastern Atlantic, and many experts say that,

0:18:18.560 --> 0:18:22.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, we should expect more types of this extreme weather.

0:18:22.680 --> 0:18:25.159
<v Speaker 1>Why not, uh, you know, why not shift the attention.

0:18:25.160 --> 0:18:26.960
<v Speaker 1>They all right, we're gonna build this, but first we're

0:18:26.960 --> 0:18:30.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna build you know, these systems and infrastructure to prevent

0:18:30.240 --> 0:18:32.879
<v Speaker 1>against future catastrophes. Okay, I'm going to tell you that

0:18:32.920 --> 0:18:36.200
<v Speaker 1>I have not heard any sort of extensive substance scientific

0:18:36.200 --> 0:18:38.320
<v Speaker 1>debate about this, but that if we hear that there's

0:18:38.359 --> 0:18:40.720
<v Speaker 1>funding for an Army Corps of Engineer study to figure

0:18:40.760 --> 0:18:43.760
<v Speaker 1>out overlays for a border wall and for flood management,

0:18:44.240 --> 0:18:46.400
<v Speaker 1>calling you, you're gonna get the credit for this one.

0:18:46.480 --> 0:18:49.040
<v Speaker 1>But but I will say that President Trump has looked,

0:18:49.040 --> 0:18:51.520
<v Speaker 1>of course and putting solar panels on his conception for

0:18:51.560 --> 0:18:53.720
<v Speaker 1>a wall, has looked at a number of different ways

0:18:53.760 --> 0:18:57.359
<v Speaker 1>to uh both sell it rhetorically and politically, and to

0:18:58.080 --> 0:19:00.640
<v Speaker 1>try to come up with funding macan isms that could

0:19:00.640 --> 0:19:02.720
<v Speaker 1>in theory work or at least keep the debate alive.

0:19:02.760 --> 0:19:05.479
<v Speaker 1>I would say nothing is off the table in this debate.

0:19:05.560 --> 0:19:08.360
<v Speaker 1>But for now, this administration has decided that the one

0:19:08.359 --> 0:19:10.159
<v Speaker 1>thing they'd like to take off the table is this

0:19:10.200 --> 0:19:12.320
<v Speaker 1>debate over the debt limit, over the debt ceiling. And

0:19:12.359 --> 0:19:14.840
<v Speaker 1>they think I think that they think, and we'll know,

0:19:15.400 --> 0:19:18.959
<v Speaker 1>uh perhaps later today that this that the coupling of

0:19:19.000 --> 0:19:22.080
<v Speaker 1>that with the emergency FEMA and s b A assistance,

0:19:22.119 --> 0:19:24.679
<v Speaker 1>at least just to patch through the fiscal year is uh,

0:19:25.200 --> 0:19:27.479
<v Speaker 1>maybe the smartest way to do it. Margaret, I'd love

0:19:27.480 --> 0:19:29.879
<v Speaker 1>to you to take a little bit bigger picture of

0:19:29.920 --> 0:19:33.600
<v Speaker 1>view on the GOP and the mood right now in

0:19:33.960 --> 0:19:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Washington and just get a sense of as we move

0:19:36.880 --> 0:19:39.760
<v Speaker 1>beyond the healthcare debate and towards something that is much

0:19:39.760 --> 0:19:42.280
<v Speaker 1>more comfortable for everybody within the g OP, which is

0:19:42.320 --> 0:19:47.120
<v Speaker 1>tax reform. Have have things gotten less acrimonious well over

0:19:47.160 --> 0:19:50.680
<v Speaker 1>the summer, No, they've gotten more acrimonious, and something that

0:19:51.280 --> 0:19:55.520
<v Speaker 1>that should be easier than healthcare, tax reform has complexities

0:19:55.600 --> 0:19:57.680
<v Speaker 1>of its own, which we're going to see emerge. That's

0:19:57.680 --> 0:20:00.399
<v Speaker 1>part of the reason why the Trump administration is looking

0:20:00.440 --> 0:20:03.240
<v Speaker 1>for ways again to at least take the death healing

0:20:03.240 --> 0:20:05.520
<v Speaker 1>fight out of the way and let this be a

0:20:05.560 --> 0:20:08.879
<v Speaker 1>fight over government spending. But look, the earlier plans for

0:20:09.000 --> 0:20:14.320
<v Speaker 1>broad stroke tax reform, you know, have shrunk in terms

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:17.880
<v Speaker 1>of ambition, so that the must pass situation now really

0:20:17.960 --> 0:20:20.680
<v Speaker 1>is a tax cut as far as the Republican Party

0:20:20.720 --> 0:20:24.280
<v Speaker 1>is concerned. And there are divisions within the Republican Party

0:20:24.400 --> 0:20:27.080
<v Speaker 1>about those who think that uh, any cuts have to

0:20:27.119 --> 0:20:29.280
<v Speaker 1>be offset, how are they going to be offset? Uh?

0:20:29.520 --> 0:20:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Is the Trump administration and the Congression leadership going to

0:20:32.520 --> 0:20:36.440
<v Speaker 1>propose tax increases on the very wealthy or no tax cut?

0:20:36.800 --> 0:20:39.639
<v Speaker 1>Uh for the wealthy? What are the thresholds going to be?

0:20:39.680 --> 0:20:42.000
<v Speaker 1>What's the size of the middle class tax cut? What's

0:20:42.040 --> 0:20:45.240
<v Speaker 1>more important? Middle class tax cuts or the corporate tax cut?

0:20:45.600 --> 0:20:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Can President Trump live with something that's uh, not a

0:20:48.800 --> 0:20:51.320
<v Speaker 1>fift cut, but something in the mid twenties. These are

0:20:51.359 --> 0:20:54.359
<v Speaker 1>all questions that the White House has not answered because

0:20:54.359 --> 0:20:58.119
<v Speaker 1>they haven't put details to paper, and that um converse

0:20:58.119 --> 0:21:00.320
<v Speaker 1>hasn't answered because they've been gone for several weeks. All

0:21:00.359 --> 0:21:01.920
<v Speaker 1>of this will come to the four in the next

0:21:01.960 --> 0:21:05.080
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks as lawmakers come back. Margaret Tellivan, thank

0:21:05.080 --> 0:21:06.680
<v Speaker 1>you so much for joining us, and I really hope

0:21:06.720 --> 0:21:09.720
<v Speaker 1>that you can have some quality time off over this

0:21:09.840 --> 0:21:25.120
<v Speaker 1>long weekend. Shares of General Motors are up more than

0:21:25.160 --> 0:21:28.159
<v Speaker 1>two and a quarter percent, as other shares of Ford Motor.

0:21:28.240 --> 0:21:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Chrysler shares are up nearly five percent. What does this

0:21:31.119 --> 0:21:34.520
<v Speaker 1>tell us about the automobile industry and August auto sales?

0:21:34.840 --> 0:21:37.800
<v Speaker 1>We'll here to answer that question. Is Jessica Caldwell, executive

0:21:37.800 --> 0:21:41.159
<v Speaker 1>director of industry analysis for Edmunds dot Com, joining us

0:21:41.160 --> 0:21:45.280
<v Speaker 1>from Santa Monica, California. Jessica, thank you for being with us.

0:21:45.600 --> 0:21:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Give us your view of today's report for August automobile sales. Yeah,

0:21:51.200 --> 0:21:53.200
<v Speaker 1>I was looking a little disappointing, to be quite honest.

0:21:53.240 --> 0:21:56.200
<v Speaker 1>We thought August would be the first month in seen

0:21:56.240 --> 0:21:59.760
<v Speaker 1>that can possibly be a month in in but it

0:21:59.800 --> 0:22:02.280
<v Speaker 1>does look like that's going to be the case. I

0:22:02.320 --> 0:22:04.680
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of sales were hampered by the last

0:22:04.720 --> 0:22:08.080
<v Speaker 1>week with Hurricane Harvey, especially for brands like Ford, who

0:22:08.160 --> 0:22:11.400
<v Speaker 1>reported a decrease of two point one per cent um.

0:22:11.440 --> 0:22:13.600
<v Speaker 1>But I think overall it's it's a little all over

0:22:13.640 --> 0:22:15.159
<v Speaker 1>the place. But I would say I would sum it

0:22:15.240 --> 0:22:18.960
<v Speaker 1>up with the word disappointing, Jessica. You know, as PIM

0:22:19.040 --> 0:22:21.600
<v Speaker 1>was saying, shares her up and I'm wondering how much

0:22:21.960 --> 0:22:26.240
<v Speaker 1>investors are looking beyond the disappointing numbers, saying, you know what,

0:22:26.480 --> 0:22:29.600
<v Speaker 1>give them some slack because Texas is a huge market

0:22:29.640 --> 0:22:31.359
<v Speaker 1>and it was basically all but shut down in the

0:22:31.400 --> 0:22:33.680
<v Speaker 1>past in the last week of the month, and then

0:22:33.720 --> 0:22:36.440
<v Speaker 1>looking ahead, you're going to see all of these sales

0:22:36.440 --> 0:22:39.120
<v Speaker 1>to people who lost their cars. It's going to actually

0:22:39.240 --> 0:22:41.240
<v Speaker 1>end up being kind of a lifeline for some of

0:22:41.240 --> 0:22:43.680
<v Speaker 1>these companies. What do you say to that. Yeah, I

0:22:43.680 --> 0:22:45.879
<v Speaker 1>mean that's pretty much exactly right. And I would imagine

0:22:45.880 --> 0:22:47.280
<v Speaker 1>why there is a bit of a rally because we

0:22:47.280 --> 0:22:51.520
<v Speaker 1>would expect to see replacement demand really fulfill in the

0:22:52.200 --> 0:22:54.879
<v Speaker 1>rest of sen So I think that that is is

0:22:54.920 --> 0:22:57.240
<v Speaker 1>certainly going to happen. And it seems as if from

0:22:57.280 --> 0:22:59.760
<v Speaker 1>what I'm hearing in UM from Houston dealers is that

0:23:00.119 --> 0:23:02.119
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the inventory is not as effective as

0:23:02.160 --> 0:23:04.760
<v Speaker 1>people think it is. So those trucks and those cars

0:23:04.760 --> 0:23:08.000
<v Speaker 1>will be available for people who may have lost UM

0:23:08.240 --> 0:23:10.439
<v Speaker 1>during the hurricane. And we saw this with other storms

0:23:10.480 --> 0:23:12.679
<v Speaker 1>like Hurricanes Andy for instance, we saw a big boost

0:23:12.720 --> 0:23:15.320
<v Speaker 1>auto cells for the rest of the year. I'm wondering,

0:23:15.359 --> 0:23:20.920
<v Speaker 1>do you think this will also boost used car sale values? UM?

0:23:20.920 --> 0:23:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Probably so. UM. I would imagine Texas is a is

0:23:23.800 --> 0:23:25.360
<v Speaker 1>a pretty big used car state. They do a high

0:23:25.400 --> 0:23:28.080
<v Speaker 1>percentage of used vehicles and used it as a bit

0:23:28.119 --> 0:23:30.439
<v Speaker 1>tricky because there is a lot of demand for you know,

0:23:30.440 --> 0:23:32.480
<v Speaker 1>pickup trucks, and you know Texas has a lot of

0:23:32.520 --> 0:23:35.400
<v Speaker 1>pickup trucks. That they're selling UM, So I think that

0:23:35.400 --> 0:23:38.639
<v Speaker 1>that would probably put more pressure on US prices, particularly

0:23:38.680 --> 0:23:41.199
<v Speaker 1>for trucks and SUVs, because there is a bit of

0:23:41.280 --> 0:23:45.560
<v Speaker 1>a scarcity in those segments. What makes the Texas automobile

0:23:45.640 --> 0:23:51.040
<v Speaker 1>market different from perhaps the national market, Well, I think

0:23:51.080 --> 0:23:53.719
<v Speaker 1>that Texas, um, you know, it's it's a it's a

0:23:53.760 --> 0:23:55.919
<v Speaker 1>big open space. So these people are going to need

0:23:55.960 --> 0:23:58.920
<v Speaker 1>cars because not as if it's a disaster is hit

0:23:58.920 --> 0:24:01.840
<v Speaker 1>in a place where public trainsportation is something that people

0:24:01.840 --> 0:24:03.560
<v Speaker 1>could rely on in the interim. A lot of these

0:24:03.560 --> 0:24:06.560
<v Speaker 1>folks they're gonna need cars pretty much, you know, right away,

0:24:06.600 --> 0:24:09.280
<v Speaker 1>to to continue their lives. So I think that that's

0:24:09.320 --> 0:24:11.639
<v Speaker 1>probably makes it a little bit different. And they just

0:24:11.680 --> 0:24:15.080
<v Speaker 1>tend to they tend to buy more trucks, more SUVs,

0:24:15.240 --> 0:24:19.080
<v Speaker 1>so those profit rich vehicles for for automakers are gonna

0:24:19.080 --> 0:24:20.760
<v Speaker 1>make a lot more money selling the F one fifty

0:24:20.800 --> 0:24:23.200
<v Speaker 1>than they would a for Fiesta. So I think that

0:24:23.240 --> 0:24:25.480
<v Speaker 1>makes it a you know, right market for these these

0:24:25.480 --> 0:24:28.000
<v Speaker 1>auto companies. Jessica, do you have any sense of how

0:24:28.000 --> 0:24:31.199
<v Speaker 1>many cars, how many vehicles in general, were destroyed in

0:24:31.480 --> 0:24:35.280
<v Speaker 1>the flooding and what type of volumes that would mean

0:24:35.359 --> 0:24:39.919
<v Speaker 1>for companies like Forward. Yeah. I mean it's hard to say, um,

0:24:39.920 --> 0:24:41.960
<v Speaker 1>because it does seem as if, you know, we did

0:24:41.960 --> 0:24:44.280
<v Speaker 1>some estimates, Um, but some of the reports that we're

0:24:44.280 --> 0:24:46.320
<v Speaker 1>hearing is that, you know, the damage to cars was

0:24:46.320 --> 0:24:48.760
<v Speaker 1>perhaps not as great as as you know, it feared

0:24:48.760 --> 0:24:50.320
<v Speaker 1>in the beginning of the week or you know, the

0:24:50.359 --> 0:24:52.040
<v Speaker 1>beginning of the storm and we start to realize, wow,

0:24:52.080 --> 0:24:54.920
<v Speaker 1>this is getting really bad. But for someone like Floor,

0:24:55.040 --> 0:24:58.399
<v Speaker 1>Texas is their their number one market, so getting these uh,

0:24:58.520 --> 0:25:02.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, these vehicles to dealers is probably going to be,

0:25:02.520 --> 0:25:04.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, a top priority for the company moving forward.

0:25:04.840 --> 0:25:06.480
<v Speaker 1>It's you know, it's a it's a big money state

0:25:06.520 --> 0:25:09.800
<v Speaker 1>for them, Jessica. In today's non farm payroll report, we

0:25:09.920 --> 0:25:12.840
<v Speaker 1>learned that about thirty six thousand jobs were added to

0:25:12.840 --> 0:25:16.640
<v Speaker 1>the manufacturing sector, and more than ten thousand of those

0:25:16.720 --> 0:25:20.400
<v Speaker 1>jobs were in the automobile industry. Does that indicate that

0:25:20.480 --> 0:25:26.120
<v Speaker 1>the auto manufacturers will start ramping up production? M Um.

0:25:26.160 --> 0:25:28.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that's probably still tentative. I mean, inventory numbers

0:25:28.800 --> 0:25:31.040
<v Speaker 1>look really high, So not only our inventory numbers high,

0:25:31.280 --> 0:25:34.240
<v Speaker 1>but also the amount of time cars sit on dealership

0:25:34.320 --> 0:25:37.720
<v Speaker 1>lots that's been mounting all through seen. Um. I think

0:25:37.720 --> 0:25:41.520
<v Speaker 1>that there probably is pockets of inventor or of manufacturing

0:25:41.520 --> 0:25:44.640
<v Speaker 1>that needs to be addressed, especially as it relates to UM,

0:25:44.680 --> 0:25:47.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, new features like autonomous features, all, you know,

0:25:47.000 --> 0:25:49.560
<v Speaker 1>all of that sector. UM. But it seems as if

0:25:49.880 --> 0:25:53.560
<v Speaker 1>inventory for now is is doing okay. But there may

0:25:53.560 --> 0:25:56.520
<v Speaker 1>be pockets, you know, as we look to replace damaged

0:25:56.640 --> 0:25:59.679
<v Speaker 1>cars in Texas, Louisiana those areas, there maybe a bit

0:25:59.720 --> 0:26:01.600
<v Speaker 1>of a ramp up in production, but I'd say that

0:26:01.600 --> 0:26:04.399
<v Speaker 1>that's probably pretty tentative at this point. Jessica, I know

0:26:04.480 --> 0:26:07.159
<v Speaker 1>this may be a sideline, but I'm wondering if electric

0:26:07.240 --> 0:26:12.040
<v Speaker 1>and hybrid vehicles will be hurt by the publicity related

0:26:12.080 --> 0:26:15.639
<v Speaker 1>to Hurricane Harvey. Because clearly you might be able to start,

0:26:15.800 --> 0:26:18.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, a fossil fuel vehicle, but trying to get

0:26:18.520 --> 0:26:22.720
<v Speaker 1>an electric vehicle started when everything is wet, that's not

0:26:22.760 --> 0:26:26.879
<v Speaker 1>necessarily going to be an easy challenge. Yeah. Yeah, I

0:26:26.880 --> 0:26:29.880
<v Speaker 1>know what you're saying. Definitely, um, probably not. I mean,

0:26:29.920 --> 0:26:31.879
<v Speaker 1>I think when you look at the you know, the

0:26:31.920 --> 0:26:34.719
<v Speaker 1>electric vehicle like PEP, you look at pure electric vehicles

0:26:34.760 --> 0:26:36.680
<v Speaker 1>about her electric they make up blessed in one person

0:26:36.720 --> 0:26:38.680
<v Speaker 1>in the market about point six percent this year. So

0:26:38.720 --> 0:26:40.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't think you're necessarily going to see a big

0:26:40.480 --> 0:26:43.720
<v Speaker 1>hit a fallout from folks that are you know, saying

0:26:43.960 --> 0:26:46.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe not. Um. I think people that like electric they're

0:26:46.720 --> 0:26:49.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, they're fairly either you know, motivated by some

0:26:49.520 --> 0:26:51.200
<v Speaker 1>of the price or they're you know, they're they're die

0:26:51.240 --> 0:26:53.120
<v Speaker 1>hard in terms of, you know, that's what they want.

0:26:53.200 --> 0:26:55.560
<v Speaker 1>So I would imagine that any any effects would be

0:26:55.600 --> 0:26:59.879
<v Speaker 1>pretty pretty small. The effects of higher gasoline prices, we

0:27:00.080 --> 0:27:03.560
<v Speaker 1>know that they may be temporary because of the output

0:27:03.880 --> 0:27:07.720
<v Speaker 1>constraints from refineries in the Gulf region. What will that

0:27:07.840 --> 0:27:10.920
<v Speaker 1>do to drivers, uh, sort of driving on the and

0:27:11.000 --> 0:27:13.840
<v Speaker 1>the sales outlook, Yeah, it's gonna be a bit of

0:27:13.880 --> 0:27:15.679
<v Speaker 1>a shock for folks because I think that we've been

0:27:15.760 --> 0:27:18.160
<v Speaker 1>you so used to low gas prices for so long.

0:27:18.440 --> 0:27:20.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's necessarily going to change the Uh,

0:27:21.200 --> 0:27:22.960
<v Speaker 1>people that need to buy a car that you know,

0:27:22.960 --> 0:27:24.480
<v Speaker 1>had planned to buy a car for the rest of

0:27:24.520 --> 0:27:27.679
<v Speaker 1>the year. Um, you could possibly see shifts and what

0:27:27.760 --> 0:27:30.240
<v Speaker 1>people buy, I would imagine, not just because of the

0:27:30.280 --> 0:27:33.719
<v Speaker 1>shift towards crossovers, but crossovers a lot more fuel efficient

0:27:33.720 --> 0:27:35.840
<v Speaker 1>than they were than the the SUVs of the past.

0:27:36.200 --> 0:27:38.440
<v Speaker 1>So I think people are willing to accept that difference

0:27:38.480 --> 0:27:41.560
<v Speaker 1>in in fuel economy changes. So I think that it

0:27:41.600 --> 0:27:43.920
<v Speaker 1>could put it, you know, in terms hamper or made

0:27:43.920 --> 0:27:46.640
<v Speaker 1>delay some purchases, um you know, depending on how long

0:27:46.720 --> 0:27:49.720
<v Speaker 1>really the gas price spikes um uh you know is

0:27:49.720 --> 0:27:51.760
<v Speaker 1>for I think when you see temporary, when people see

0:27:51.800 --> 0:27:55.199
<v Speaker 1>temporary expected spikes, it doesn't really change the purchasing behavior.

0:27:55.240 --> 0:27:58.920
<v Speaker 1>I think gas shock will start to change people's purposes

0:27:58.920 --> 0:28:01.879
<v Speaker 1>behavior after an extended period like six months. That's kind

0:28:01.880 --> 0:28:03.320
<v Speaker 1>of what we saw in two thousand and eight when

0:28:03.359 --> 0:28:05.800
<v Speaker 1>gas prices got you know, really out of control during

0:28:05.840 --> 0:28:09.680
<v Speaker 1>the spring and summertime. Well, other equipment makers see better

0:28:09.720 --> 0:28:12.840
<v Speaker 1>times ahead because of all the repairs that will need

0:28:12.880 --> 0:28:18.080
<v Speaker 1>to be made for these automobiles, likely especially um you know,

0:28:18.160 --> 0:28:20.720
<v Speaker 1>part suppliers. I think that there could be um you know,

0:28:20.800 --> 0:28:22.760
<v Speaker 1>for those vehicles that are able to be salvage. Of course,

0:28:22.800 --> 0:28:24.480
<v Speaker 1>that's a big question in terms of what can be

0:28:24.520 --> 0:28:27.000
<v Speaker 1>saved and what cannot be saved. Um. But I think

0:28:27.160 --> 0:28:30.280
<v Speaker 1>replacement parts um you know, trying to to fix some

0:28:30.359 --> 0:28:33.560
<v Speaker 1>of these cars, um is you know, could see a boost.

0:28:33.720 --> 0:28:35.159
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a lot of questions because of all

0:28:35.160 --> 0:28:38.240
<v Speaker 1>the electric componentry now in cars of how much can really,

0:28:38.320 --> 0:28:40.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, be saved and if they should be so.

0:28:40.920 --> 0:28:43.040
<v Speaker 1>I think there probably are a lot of questions around

0:28:43.120 --> 0:28:46.600
<v Speaker 1>that right now. Thank you very much. Jessica Caldwell's executive

0:28:46.640 --> 0:28:50.280
<v Speaker 1>director of industry analysis for Edmunds dot com, joining us

0:28:50.320 --> 0:28:55.520
<v Speaker 1>from Santa Monica. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg P

0:28:55.640 --> 0:28:58.640
<v Speaker 1>and L podcast. You can subscribe and listen to interviews

0:28:58.640 --> 0:29:02.720
<v Speaker 1>at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whatever podcast platform you prefer.

0:29:03.120 --> 0:29:06.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at pim Fox. I'm

0:29:06.720 --> 0:29:10.000
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Lisa Abramo wits one. Before the podcast,

0:29:10.040 --> 0:29:12.640
<v Speaker 1>you can always catch us worldwide on Bloomberg Radio