WEBVTT - Beating The Book: Warren Sharp, NFL Strength of Schedule Analysis

0:00:03.440 --> 0:00:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Check it down Man, Now down Man. Tuesday, April toile

0:00:13.240 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Beating the Book Podcast is Gil Alexander. Postmasters have a

0:00:17.840 --> 0:00:21.360
<v Speaker 1>little football podcast for you. Warren Sharp on the show

0:00:21.400 --> 0:00:24.280
<v Speaker 1>today to talk NFL strength of schedule. We don't yet

0:00:24.360 --> 0:00:26.480
<v Speaker 1>know who plays, who win, but now that we have

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:29.560
<v Speaker 1>NFL season win totals out, we can give you an

0:00:29.680 --> 0:00:33.880
<v Speaker 1>educated analysis the Warren Sharp way. Not the mainstream media

0:00:34.479 --> 0:00:37.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of lazy who had what win percentage from last

0:00:37.280 --> 0:00:40.560
<v Speaker 1>year analysis, but a deep dive with Warren Sharp. Who's

0:00:40.560 --> 0:00:43.520
<v Speaker 1>got it easy, Who's got it rough? It's the National

0:00:43.560 --> 0:00:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Football League strength of schedule analysis right here on today's

0:00:46.479 --> 0:00:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Beating the Book podcast. Enjoy live from the Visan Studios

0:00:50.159 --> 0:00:53.520
<v Speaker 1>in the South Point Hotel and Casino. It's Gil Alexander

0:00:53.600 --> 0:00:55.240
<v Speaker 1>now our number two of the numbers game right here

0:00:55.240 --> 0:00:58.400
<v Speaker 1>at Visa and we're sports Betting Analytics, live actionable sports

0:00:58.400 --> 0:01:01.040
<v Speaker 1>betting information. It's Gil alexand Series X and Channel two

0:01:01.040 --> 0:01:03.120
<v Speaker 1>A four, Visa dot Com, the Visa app. First, though,

0:01:03.120 --> 0:01:05.120
<v Speaker 1>it is our pleasure to have back on the show

0:01:05.240 --> 0:01:09.360
<v Speaker 1>for the first time since football season. When last we

0:01:09.400 --> 0:01:12.399
<v Speaker 1>spoke with him, he was being whisked off to the

0:01:12.440 --> 0:01:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl between the Rams and the Patriots wind and dined,

0:01:15.959 --> 0:01:18.880
<v Speaker 1>having a good time, and we're thrilled to have him

0:01:18.920 --> 0:01:22.400
<v Speaker 1>here to talk about sort of the first level. We'll

0:01:22.400 --> 0:01:24.920
<v Speaker 1>get to the second level again when the actual chronology

0:01:25.000 --> 0:01:28.640
<v Speaker 1>of who's playing who in what weeks gets revealed, we'll

0:01:28.640 --> 0:01:30.560
<v Speaker 1>have him on again. But the first level of his

0:01:30.600 --> 0:01:33.160
<v Speaker 1>analysis of strength of schedule, now that we have the

0:01:33.160 --> 0:01:35.520
<v Speaker 1>first season win totals from CG Technology, it's our friend

0:01:35.520 --> 0:01:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Warren Sharp. Good morning to you. Warren Hey, good morning Gil.

0:01:38.959 --> 0:01:40.600
<v Speaker 1>How are you and I'm doing very well. How was

0:01:40.640 --> 0:01:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the Super Bowl? Man? Was that a great experience for you? Yeah,

0:01:44.360 --> 0:01:46.920
<v Speaker 1>it's been a whirlwind. The Super Bowl was great, not

0:01:47.000 --> 0:01:49.760
<v Speaker 1>with a few teams down there, had a lot of fun,

0:01:50.080 --> 0:01:52.400
<v Speaker 1>came back before the game actually kicked off. I didn't

0:01:52.400 --> 0:01:55.120
<v Speaker 1>actually attend the Super Bowl. Uh. Then I went up

0:01:55.160 --> 0:01:57.960
<v Speaker 1>not long after to Indianapolis for the Combine that with

0:01:58.200 --> 0:02:00.200
<v Speaker 1>some more teams up there than I had to and

0:02:00.280 --> 0:02:04.040
<v Speaker 1>my tea conference up at Sloan Sports Analytics Conference up

0:02:04.040 --> 0:02:07.760
<v Speaker 1>there in Massachusetts. So I was up there for a

0:02:07.880 --> 0:02:10.240
<v Speaker 1>day and I met with another team up there, And

0:02:10.680 --> 0:02:12.679
<v Speaker 1>since then I've been back at my home base here

0:02:13.080 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 1>cranking away getting ready for the upcoming season. Wow, that

0:02:16.560 --> 0:02:18.440
<v Speaker 1>is a whirlwind. By the way, how was the Sloan

0:02:18.480 --> 0:02:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Sports Analytics Conference panel experience for you? That was your

0:02:21.160 --> 0:02:24.120
<v Speaker 1>first one ever? Right? It was. It was a lot

0:02:24.120 --> 0:02:26.600
<v Speaker 1>of fun, um, you know. Unfortunately I was up there

0:02:26.639 --> 0:02:29.200
<v Speaker 1>because they do the panel right during the middle of

0:02:29.240 --> 0:02:31.840
<v Speaker 1>the combine, so the teams that wanted to meet with

0:02:31.880 --> 0:02:34.160
<v Speaker 1>me out in Indy and then and they weren't coming

0:02:34.280 --> 0:02:37.200
<v Speaker 1>up to Sloan. They typically would, but because it was

0:02:37.280 --> 0:02:40.200
<v Speaker 1>right during the first couple of days of the combine,

0:02:40.280 --> 0:02:42.280
<v Speaker 1>like right in the heart of it, they couldn't get

0:02:42.280 --> 0:02:44.160
<v Speaker 1>away from there. And then there was other teams who

0:02:44.160 --> 0:02:46.880
<v Speaker 1>were going up to Sloan, so I was able to.

0:02:46.919 --> 0:02:49.400
<v Speaker 1>I had to like split my time between the two

0:02:49.800 --> 0:02:51.760
<v Speaker 1>uh and took a three day trip and spent I

0:02:51.800 --> 0:02:54.160
<v Speaker 1>guess most of it in Indy and then I was

0:02:54.200 --> 0:02:56.600
<v Speaker 1>only up in Boston for twenty four hours. So if

0:02:56.639 --> 0:02:59.960
<v Speaker 1>I would do it again, hopefully they spread it out

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:02.600
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. I'm skeptical of that. I love to

0:03:02.600 --> 0:03:04.440
<v Speaker 1>spend a little bit more time up in Boston because

0:03:04.440 --> 0:03:07.000
<v Speaker 1>it was a lot of fun, but I love the city.

0:03:07.080 --> 0:03:09.919
<v Speaker 1>I loved being able to meet with some people back

0:03:09.960 --> 0:03:12.160
<v Speaker 1>in the Green room, a lot of the other speakers

0:03:12.240 --> 0:03:15.840
<v Speaker 1>got to meet with michae Leach, coach of the Washington

0:03:15.880 --> 0:03:18.799
<v Speaker 1>State football team, and he's a ton of fun and

0:03:18.840 --> 0:03:22.800
<v Speaker 1>we talked a little bit about game planning and strategy. Uh.

0:03:22.840 --> 0:03:25.600
<v Speaker 1>And you know this, this a very good experience. But

0:03:25.720 --> 0:03:28.119
<v Speaker 1>only regret is that it was a little bit short. Man.

0:03:28.200 --> 0:03:30.720
<v Speaker 1>What what That's awesome. We're just living through you right

0:03:30.760 --> 0:03:33.400
<v Speaker 1>there for a second, just daydreaming that we were you

0:03:33.400 --> 0:03:35.000
<v Speaker 1>for a second before we get to your strength of

0:03:35.000 --> 0:03:37.000
<v Speaker 1>schedule analysis. Then I'd be remiss if I didn't ask

0:03:37.040 --> 0:03:39.360
<v Speaker 1>you since you brought it up so many times there, Warren. Uh,

0:03:39.440 --> 0:03:41.480
<v Speaker 1>do you have any wonderful announcements you'd like to make

0:03:41.480 --> 0:03:43.040
<v Speaker 1>about any of your meetings with teams or you want

0:03:43.080 --> 0:03:46.200
<v Speaker 1>to hold off of that? Uh? No, I actually haven't

0:03:46.240 --> 0:03:52.040
<v Speaker 1>inked anything still uh receiving uh kind of offers discussing

0:03:52.080 --> 0:03:54.640
<v Speaker 1>things with teams, and UH haven't made any types of

0:03:54.680 --> 0:03:59.960
<v Speaker 1>decision yet. So I'm taking the process slow. But it's

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:03.520
<v Speaker 1>it's good to see you wanted, so everybody wants. Well,

0:04:03.560 --> 0:04:06.280
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to have whatever you do, whatever contract you

0:04:06.280 --> 0:04:07.800
<v Speaker 1>you write, if you could have just the carve out

0:04:07.800 --> 0:04:09.360
<v Speaker 1>like I still get to do an hour with Gil

0:04:09.400 --> 0:04:12.040
<v Speaker 1>and crack on on Thursdays on a numberscap if you

0:04:12.080 --> 0:04:13.880
<v Speaker 1>could write, if you could write that in there. So

0:04:14.160 --> 0:04:17.080
<v Speaker 1>just so, the CG technology first, So the first season

0:04:17.080 --> 0:04:20.480
<v Speaker 1>win totals came out. CG technology first to post them

0:04:20.480 --> 0:04:22.599
<v Speaker 1>again this year, as they were last year, but this

0:04:22.680 --> 0:04:25.120
<v Speaker 1>year a little earlier, and we're seeing that throughout the

0:04:25.120 --> 0:04:29.280
<v Speaker 1>sports betting landscape. We had baseball season win totals earlier

0:04:29.320 --> 0:04:31.760
<v Speaker 1>than ever in January from Caesar's and now we have

0:04:31.839 --> 0:04:34.320
<v Speaker 1>CG doing it at the end of March. So let's

0:04:34.360 --> 0:04:36.440
<v Speaker 1>start with one of your tweets. This is actually your

0:04:37.400 --> 0:04:42.080
<v Speaker 1>relabeled graphic if you would, Warren on this one again.

0:04:42.240 --> 0:04:45.480
<v Speaker 1>All of this at sharp football stats dot com or

0:04:45.480 --> 0:04:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Sharp football analysis dot com. This is stats, right, yeah, okay,

0:04:49.480 --> 0:04:51.839
<v Speaker 1>this is Sharp football stats dot Com. Again. Warren has

0:04:52.520 --> 0:04:55.320
<v Speaker 1>great visuals where you can sort of in a snapshot

0:04:55.400 --> 0:04:58.320
<v Speaker 1>glean a lot of information. So walk us through briefly.

0:04:58.320 --> 0:04:59.720
<v Speaker 1>We'll start with this one and then I'll sort of

0:04:59.760 --> 0:05:04.080
<v Speaker 1>ask you to steer us how you want to go. Yeah, so, obviously,

0:05:04.120 --> 0:05:05.920
<v Speaker 1>as you mentioned, you know, they came out with these

0:05:06.160 --> 0:05:09.440
<v Speaker 1>uh substantially earlier um than last year. I believe last

0:05:09.520 --> 0:05:12.840
<v Speaker 1>year's win totals, if I'm not mistaken, came up right

0:05:12.960 --> 0:05:14.960
<v Speaker 1>as the draft was starting. Maybe it was at the

0:05:15.000 --> 0:05:17.920
<v Speaker 1>first round of the draft. And this year obviously they

0:05:17.920 --> 0:05:21.320
<v Speaker 1>did them at the last day of March. So, um,

0:05:21.360 --> 0:05:24.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, I love seeing them earlier, the better we

0:05:24.920 --> 0:05:27.080
<v Speaker 1>can analyze until a little bit longer. The only downside

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:29.920
<v Speaker 1>of that, of course, is you probably understand I don't

0:05:29.920 --> 0:05:31.200
<v Speaker 1>know what the limits are on these. I mean, it

0:05:31.240 --> 0:05:34.160
<v Speaker 1>could just be five dollars, which is worthless to toward.

0:05:34.200 --> 0:05:36.679
<v Speaker 1>A sort of tip your hand is to and bet

0:05:36.680 --> 0:05:39.240
<v Speaker 1>these things now if if um, you know, if you

0:05:39.240 --> 0:05:42.599
<v Speaker 1>can only get down five on them. So but I

0:05:42.640 --> 0:05:46.160
<v Speaker 1>believe the graphic that you're probably looking at their UM

0:05:46.279 --> 0:05:49.359
<v Speaker 1>showcases all the teams from the team that's projected to

0:05:49.360 --> 0:05:51.240
<v Speaker 1>win the most games to the team that's projected to

0:05:51.279 --> 0:05:53.800
<v Speaker 1>win the lease games, which is the Arizona Cardinals, and

0:05:53.800 --> 0:05:56.599
<v Speaker 1>then it compares that with what they did last season

0:05:56.640 --> 0:05:59.839
<v Speaker 1>with the record last season to show what the forecast

0:05:59.839 --> 0:06:04.159
<v Speaker 1>in provement UH is or regression. Maybe in the cases

0:06:04.200 --> 0:06:07.279
<v Speaker 1>of some teams, like for example, of the Chicago Bears

0:06:07.480 --> 0:06:09.960
<v Speaker 1>and the l A Rams, who are forecast to lose

0:06:10.000 --> 0:06:12.640
<v Speaker 1>two and a half more games this year than they

0:06:12.640 --> 0:06:15.280
<v Speaker 1>did last year. It doesn't necessarily mean that they're going

0:06:15.320 --> 0:06:17.720
<v Speaker 1>to be a bad team this year. What essentially means

0:06:17.760 --> 0:06:20.480
<v Speaker 1>is that those teams obviously had twelve and thirteen wins

0:06:20.520 --> 0:06:23.839
<v Speaker 1>respectively last season. And as you know, but for the listeners,

0:06:24.000 --> 0:06:26.719
<v Speaker 1>they don't lie win totals that high. In you know,

0:06:26.800 --> 0:06:30.120
<v Speaker 1>the start the season, everybody's win totals generally sprinkled right

0:06:30.160 --> 0:06:33.320
<v Speaker 1>around between eleven ish and uh and down to like

0:06:33.400 --> 0:06:36.240
<v Speaker 1>five ish. Sometimes there's a little bit above or below that,

0:06:36.360 --> 0:06:39.400
<v Speaker 1>but it doesn't really go further much further than that.

0:06:39.560 --> 0:06:41.320
<v Speaker 1>For the vast majority of the teams are kind of

0:06:41.320 --> 0:06:44.479
<v Speaker 1>bunched together, um, and so they tend to do that

0:06:44.520 --> 0:06:46.760
<v Speaker 1>because it's they're difficult to project. You know, a certain

0:06:46.760 --> 0:06:49.359
<v Speaker 1>teams are only going to win three games or two games,

0:06:49.400 --> 0:06:51.719
<v Speaker 1>even though every single year there are teams that obviously

0:06:52.040 --> 0:06:55.280
<v Speaker 1>only win three or two games. So, um, yeah, they're

0:06:55.320 --> 0:06:57.799
<v Speaker 1>the team that's obviously forecast to win the most games

0:06:57.839 --> 0:06:59.160
<v Speaker 1>that you can see on the graphic. I don't know,

0:06:59.240 --> 0:07:02.400
<v Speaker 1>but it's a Francisco in terms of their improvement over

0:07:02.520 --> 0:07:05.400
<v Speaker 1>last season. They only won four games last year. Obviously,

0:07:05.440 --> 0:07:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Jim and Garoppolo got injured, and now they're projected to

0:07:07.760 --> 0:07:11.960
<v Speaker 1>win eight games in twenty nineteen. Um, I factor juice

0:07:12.000 --> 0:07:14.520
<v Speaker 1>into this, So I have a little formula that takes

0:07:14.520 --> 0:07:17.840
<v Speaker 1>into consideration whether it's you know, minus one ten either

0:07:17.920 --> 0:07:20.280
<v Speaker 1>side that's going to be, you know, just a flat number.

0:07:20.280 --> 0:07:23.120
<v Speaker 1>But if it's minus one, minus one thirty, obviously they're

0:07:23.120 --> 0:07:25.320
<v Speaker 1>shading it a little bit higher. And so that shouldn't

0:07:25.320 --> 0:07:28.000
<v Speaker 1>be factored into what you're saying that their win total

0:07:28.040 --> 0:07:30.840
<v Speaker 1>actually is. Another team that's projected to win more games

0:07:31.280 --> 0:07:33.800
<v Speaker 1>compared to last year would be the Green Day Packers,

0:07:34.160 --> 0:07:36.280
<v Speaker 1>projected to win three point two more games than they

0:07:36.280 --> 0:07:38.280
<v Speaker 1>did last year. They won six games last year, right

0:07:38.280 --> 0:07:41.280
<v Speaker 1>now they're projected to win nine point two. Obviously can't

0:07:41.320 --> 0:07:43.920
<v Speaker 1>win nine point two, but just factoring in the juice,

0:07:44.280 --> 0:07:46.200
<v Speaker 1>that's what it shows. And part of the reason why

0:07:46.240 --> 0:07:48.720
<v Speaker 1>there is that although they did ei Aaron Rodgers the

0:07:48.800 --> 0:07:52.160
<v Speaker 1>full sixteen games, they got rid of Mike McCarthy and

0:07:52.240 --> 0:07:54.640
<v Speaker 1>they only won three out of nine games that ended

0:07:54.640 --> 0:07:57.120
<v Speaker 1>in one score, you know, one score game, meaning that

0:07:57.240 --> 0:08:00.080
<v Speaker 1>they either won or lost the game by with in

0:08:00.240 --> 0:08:03.840
<v Speaker 1>eight points. So once some single score, but the conversion

0:08:03.920 --> 0:08:06.800
<v Speaker 1>would get you to at least the tie. Um, they

0:08:06.840 --> 0:08:09.000
<v Speaker 1>only want three of their nine games, so you would

0:08:09.000 --> 0:08:11.560
<v Speaker 1>expect typically that they should regret to the meaning in

0:08:11.600 --> 0:08:13.960
<v Speaker 1>a positive manner in this case and win a little

0:08:14.000 --> 0:08:16.400
<v Speaker 1>bit more games. So that's why they are showing the

0:08:16.480 --> 0:08:19.640
<v Speaker 1>second highest improvement compared to what the team did last year.

0:08:19.720 --> 0:08:22.480
<v Speaker 1>And there is the tweet from Warren at Sharp Football

0:08:22.520 --> 0:08:24.480
<v Speaker 1>for those watching at Visa dot com, the Visa app,

0:08:24.480 --> 0:08:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Foobo TV, or Sling TV. Uh. And then listen, before

0:08:28.240 --> 0:08:30.880
<v Speaker 1>we get to the point where we know who's playing

0:08:30.920 --> 0:08:33.200
<v Speaker 1>who what weeks of the season, we can make some

0:08:33.320 --> 0:08:36.480
<v Speaker 1>general comments about strength of schedule, and you have as well,

0:08:37.000 --> 0:08:39.680
<v Speaker 1>uh in your tweet about the three teams with the

0:08:39.679 --> 0:08:42.000
<v Speaker 1>three easiest schedule based on current wind totals and the

0:08:42.000 --> 0:08:46.000
<v Speaker 1>three teams that have the three hardest. Who are those? Yes,

0:08:46.080 --> 0:08:48.319
<v Speaker 1>So you know the way that I like to break

0:08:48.360 --> 0:08:53.360
<v Speaker 1>down UM wind totals obviously is I look at I

0:08:53.600 --> 0:08:56.360
<v Speaker 1>use that to forecast strength of schedule. And as you know,

0:08:56.720 --> 0:08:58.959
<v Speaker 1>still and this is a great point that you're kind

0:08:59.000 --> 0:09:02.400
<v Speaker 1>of at the forefront of beating the drum along with

0:09:02.440 --> 0:09:05.840
<v Speaker 1>me about sharing this with people that using prior year

0:09:06.040 --> 0:09:10.000
<v Speaker 1>win loss record to forecast the team's record for this year,

0:09:10.000 --> 0:09:12.120
<v Speaker 1>like assuming that they're going to win the exact same

0:09:12.200 --> 0:09:14.719
<v Speaker 1>number of games last year compared to this year, and

0:09:14.800 --> 0:09:18.720
<v Speaker 1>so forecasting strength of schedule for this season based on

0:09:18.760 --> 0:09:23.000
<v Speaker 1>what the teams did last year is astronomically dumb, and

0:09:23.080 --> 0:09:27.200
<v Speaker 1>so a lot of media outlets use that methodology. We

0:09:27.520 --> 0:09:29.959
<v Speaker 1>we don't want to fall into that group led by

0:09:30.280 --> 0:09:34.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, Shepherd down the wrong path. So we're going

0:09:34.240 --> 0:09:36.320
<v Speaker 1>in the correct way to look at things, which is,

0:09:36.559 --> 0:09:40.960
<v Speaker 1>let's look at the forecasted wins for this season. What

0:09:41.080 --> 0:09:43.480
<v Speaker 1>are the books who are taking bets, willing to stake

0:09:43.679 --> 0:09:47.200
<v Speaker 1>their own reputation of money on these things going to

0:09:47.920 --> 0:09:50.320
<v Speaker 1>forecast these teams to do. And then let's an examine

0:09:50.320 --> 0:09:52.760
<v Speaker 1>strength of schedule based upon that. And when you do that,

0:09:53.120 --> 0:09:55.080
<v Speaker 1>what you find is that the three teams with the

0:09:55.120 --> 0:10:00.640
<v Speaker 1>easiest schedules for nineteen are the Patriots, the jet and

0:10:00.800 --> 0:10:04.880
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles. And the three teams with the hardest schedules

0:10:04.920 --> 0:10:09.720
<v Speaker 1>are the Texans, the Broncos, and the Raiders. Now let's

0:10:09.760 --> 0:10:12.120
<v Speaker 1>talk about that. I'm sure you've got some comments, but

0:10:12.200 --> 0:10:14.200
<v Speaker 1>the one thing that jumps out to me the most is,

0:10:14.240 --> 0:10:16.880
<v Speaker 1>of course, a couple of really good teams with really

0:10:16.880 --> 0:10:19.160
<v Speaker 1>easy schedules, in part helped by the fact they don't

0:10:19.200 --> 0:10:21.319
<v Speaker 1>play themselves. You know, the Patriots don't have to play

0:10:21.360 --> 0:10:23.520
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots twice, so naturally they're not going to be

0:10:23.600 --> 0:10:26.360
<v Speaker 1>playing the most difficult team. But even so, they still

0:10:26.360 --> 0:10:30.199
<v Speaker 1>have a extremely easy schedule. They typically are easy, uh

0:10:30.440 --> 0:10:33.520
<v Speaker 1>have easier schedules most of the season because they played

0:10:33.520 --> 0:10:35.480
<v Speaker 1>the a FC East. That means they don't play themselves

0:10:35.480 --> 0:10:38.560
<v Speaker 1>and they play these other terrible teams six games. But

0:10:38.640 --> 0:10:41.280
<v Speaker 1>then the other side of it is the Texans. The

0:10:41.360 --> 0:10:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Texans at this time this last year, Gale, we talked

0:10:44.440 --> 0:10:48.120
<v Speaker 1>about this, Texans had the easiest schedule in the NFL

0:10:48.200 --> 0:10:51.040
<v Speaker 1>based on wind totals, the number one easy schedule that

0:10:51.080 --> 0:10:53.240
<v Speaker 1>I was forecasting, and that's one of the reasons why

0:10:53.600 --> 0:10:56.720
<v Speaker 1>some people started to look at setting their win total

0:10:56.840 --> 0:11:00.679
<v Speaker 1>over last season placing that's on the Texan during the

0:11:00.679 --> 0:11:01.959
<v Speaker 1>course of the year. They were one of the most

0:11:01.960 --> 0:11:05.760
<v Speaker 1>popular teams last season in part because they're super easy

0:11:05.800 --> 0:11:09.320
<v Speaker 1>schedule and that was calculated based upon the forecasted win

0:11:09.440 --> 0:11:12.160
<v Speaker 1>totals is the easiest in the league, and it was

0:11:12.200 --> 0:11:14.800
<v Speaker 1>another good reason why they were a great spade in

0:11:14.840 --> 0:11:17.360
<v Speaker 1>the postseason because we knew how easy of the schedule

0:11:17.440 --> 0:11:19.640
<v Speaker 1>that they played during the season. They got the home

0:11:19.679 --> 0:11:22.520
<v Speaker 1>field game, and it was largely because they played the

0:11:22.600 --> 0:11:25.160
<v Speaker 1>easy schedule. But look what happens twenty nine team. They

0:11:25.160 --> 0:11:28.040
<v Speaker 1>played the most difficult schedule of any team in the

0:11:28.120 --> 0:11:32.880
<v Speaker 1>NFL for the upcoming year, complete opposite ends of the spectrum.

0:11:33.200 --> 0:11:35.760
<v Speaker 1>So naturally it would be wise to expect a little

0:11:35.800 --> 0:11:37.920
<v Speaker 1>bit more regression from this team is compared to what

0:11:37.960 --> 0:11:40.240
<v Speaker 1>they did last year. Yeah, and there's the tweet from Warren.

0:11:40.800 --> 0:11:44.240
<v Speaker 1>The Texans forecast in terms of the bottom five opponents

0:11:44.280 --> 0:11:46.680
<v Speaker 1>last year, they forecast before the season they were gonna

0:11:46.679 --> 0:11:49.960
<v Speaker 1>play five this year it's zero. And then, as it

0:11:50.000 --> 0:11:52.679
<v Speaker 1>resulted in in Aaron shots is Football Outsiders d v

0:11:52.800 --> 0:11:55.840
<v Speaker 1>o A, they ended up playing just two top ten

0:11:56.000 --> 0:11:59.640
<v Speaker 1>teams last year. We shall see what the case is

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:03.360
<v Speaker 1>this coming year with the Texans. Warrent, hang out for

0:12:03.400 --> 0:12:05.200
<v Speaker 1>a second, if you would. Well, before we get to that,

0:12:05.240 --> 0:12:08.680
<v Speaker 1>one more thing about this, Uh, the Patriots interesting to

0:12:08.679 --> 0:12:10.599
<v Speaker 1>me again, easiest schedule the rest of the league, and

0:12:10.600 --> 0:12:13.000
<v Speaker 1>everybody listening is like, great, you know the Patriots. It

0:12:13.120 --> 0:12:15.199
<v Speaker 1>is by virtue of their division, right that this happens

0:12:15.520 --> 0:12:18.160
<v Speaker 1>every year, and there's a Dolphins at the very bottom

0:12:18.160 --> 0:12:20.440
<v Speaker 1>of the list this year in terms of their season

0:12:20.520 --> 0:12:22.760
<v Speaker 1>win total. So it's you know, the Patriots get that

0:12:23.120 --> 0:12:26.160
<v Speaker 1>in their favor. This dip down from what I heard

0:12:26.200 --> 0:12:29.120
<v Speaker 1>from eleven to ten and a half almost immediately like

0:12:29.440 --> 0:12:32.800
<v Speaker 1>for me, and I don't care how bearish one can

0:12:32.880 --> 0:12:35.679
<v Speaker 1>be on the Patriots. Okay, Tom Brady, the age curve,

0:12:35.720 --> 0:12:38.800
<v Speaker 1>I get it, uh, you know, but it's Tom Brady.

0:12:39.040 --> 0:12:42.520
<v Speaker 1>He defies every bit of logic possible. If you're going

0:12:42.600 --> 0:12:46.079
<v Speaker 1>to bed under on a ten and a half, you're

0:12:46.120 --> 0:12:49.760
<v Speaker 1>you're hoping the Patriots lose six football games in a

0:12:49.800 --> 0:12:54.160
<v Speaker 1>sixteen game schedule. Like to me, that's a Listen. I'm

0:12:54.200 --> 0:12:56.480
<v Speaker 1>not saying I'm rushing to bet the over, but I'm

0:12:56.559 --> 0:13:00.680
<v Speaker 1>certainly not bending the under on that right. Well, the

0:13:00.720 --> 0:13:04.240
<v Speaker 1>difficult part, as you mentioned, you know, the Patriots play

0:13:04.240 --> 0:13:06.040
<v Speaker 1>in the a f C East and the a f

0:13:06.120 --> 0:13:08.800
<v Speaker 1>C East. Especially when you look at what the Miami

0:13:08.880 --> 0:13:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Dolphins are doing this year, you know they're going to

0:13:11.440 --> 0:13:14.400
<v Speaker 1>be worse than they were last year, and that's intentional.

0:13:14.480 --> 0:13:17.880
<v Speaker 1>They are not trying to play to win games necessarily

0:13:17.920 --> 0:13:21.400
<v Speaker 1>this season, and so um, that's a team that in

0:13:21.440 --> 0:13:24.959
<v Speaker 1>the past had been trying hard and now they're still

0:13:24.960 --> 0:13:27.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna be trying, but they just don't have the pieces.

0:13:27.200 --> 0:13:31.000
<v Speaker 1>They're clearly looking to rebuild for the future. So you

0:13:31.000 --> 0:13:33.360
<v Speaker 1>you look at that division, right, you look at that division,

0:13:33.520 --> 0:13:36.920
<v Speaker 1>and of course the Dolphins are projected right now to

0:13:36.960 --> 0:13:40.280
<v Speaker 1>win the fewest games, and so the Bills and the Jets.

0:13:40.320 --> 0:13:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Should they be better than last year? Yes, they should.

0:13:43.000 --> 0:13:45.880
<v Speaker 1>They have got last year they had rookie quarterbacks in there.

0:13:46.120 --> 0:13:48.280
<v Speaker 1>This year, those guys are in their second season, so

0:13:48.400 --> 0:13:51.880
<v Speaker 1>theoretically both of those teams should be a little bit better.

0:13:51.920 --> 0:13:54.520
<v Speaker 1>But you know, the Patriots are so good at home,

0:13:54.880 --> 0:13:57.320
<v Speaker 1>right and if you look at their non divisional schedule,

0:13:58.000 --> 0:14:00.800
<v Speaker 1>we know that they play the Pittsburgh Steelers home, so

0:14:00.840 --> 0:14:02.600
<v Speaker 1>we already know that. You can go to Shark Football

0:14:02.600 --> 0:14:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Stats and you can look at the strength of schedule.

0:14:04.320 --> 0:14:06.960
<v Speaker 1>You can view all the home road opponents and what

0:14:07.160 --> 0:14:09.600
<v Speaker 1>how strong they are. They play the Steelers at home,

0:14:09.640 --> 0:14:11.439
<v Speaker 1>which is one of the best teams that they're going

0:14:11.440 --> 0:14:13.840
<v Speaker 1>to face this season. They also get the Cleveland Browns

0:14:13.880 --> 0:14:16.120
<v Speaker 1>at home, so those two teams to get to play

0:14:16.120 --> 0:14:18.640
<v Speaker 1>them at home, as well as the Dallas Cowboys. They

0:14:18.679 --> 0:14:21.520
<v Speaker 1>also play the hardest team on their entire schedule at home,

0:14:21.680 --> 0:14:25.200
<v Speaker 1>the Kansas City Chiefs. So those four teams, they get

0:14:25.240 --> 0:14:26.800
<v Speaker 1>all of those at home. Who do they have to

0:14:26.840 --> 0:14:28.560
<v Speaker 1>go on the road and face, Well, they go on

0:14:28.560 --> 0:14:30.520
<v Speaker 1>the road. Obviously, those are the more difficult games that

0:14:30.640 --> 0:14:33.320
<v Speaker 1>you're looking for. Where's Tom Brady gonna stumble, where's the

0:14:33.360 --> 0:14:36.160
<v Speaker 1>team's gonna have proms? Well, obviously they have to play

0:14:36.200 --> 0:14:38.480
<v Speaker 1>down at Miami. They tend to struggle sometimes when they

0:14:38.520 --> 0:14:40.840
<v Speaker 1>go down to Miami. That's gonna happen every single year

0:14:40.840 --> 0:14:42.600
<v Speaker 1>they play in Miami. They get to go on the

0:14:42.640 --> 0:14:46.040
<v Speaker 1>road and they play the the Cincinnati Bengals. They also

0:14:46.080 --> 0:14:48.440
<v Speaker 1>play the Washington Redskins, two of the bottom five teams

0:14:48.440 --> 0:14:50.920
<v Speaker 1>sorry for your Skins in the NFL. Terms of the

0:14:50.920 --> 0:14:54.080
<v Speaker 1>forecast for this upcoming season, they have three difficult games

0:14:54.120 --> 0:14:57.120
<v Speaker 1>on the road, but they're manageable because you look at

0:14:57.160 --> 0:15:00.880
<v Speaker 1>the I guess the overall quarterback h uarterback talent that

0:15:00.920 --> 0:15:02.800
<v Speaker 1>they're going to face. The hardest of the three is

0:15:02.840 --> 0:15:05.520
<v Speaker 1>going to be the Philadelphiagles, who are really looking strong

0:15:05.600 --> 0:15:08.360
<v Speaker 1>this upcoming season. Then they go to Baltimore and play

0:15:08.400 --> 0:15:11.440
<v Speaker 1>the Baltimore Ravens, obviously Lamar Jackson. If you can get

0:15:11.480 --> 0:15:13.800
<v Speaker 1>ahead a lead on Lamar Jackson is gonna be difficult

0:15:13.800 --> 0:15:15.560
<v Speaker 1>for him to get throw the ball and get back

0:15:15.560 --> 0:15:17.800
<v Speaker 1>in the game, right, So that could That's an interesting

0:15:17.880 --> 0:15:19.840
<v Speaker 1>type of game, the way that's going to flow. And

0:15:19.840 --> 0:15:21.920
<v Speaker 1>then you've got to Houston Texans, who we just talked about.

0:15:21.960 --> 0:15:24.800
<v Speaker 1>They didn't play anybody last season. Going up against Tom

0:15:24.840 --> 0:15:27.640
<v Speaker 1>Brady in this offense, we go, theyre going to Rob Groomkowski.

0:15:27.680 --> 0:15:29.680
<v Speaker 1>But it's got a great coach and great quarterbacks, So

0:15:30.000 --> 0:15:33.320
<v Speaker 1>I understand. You know, it's different any year that you're

0:15:33.360 --> 0:15:35.480
<v Speaker 1>betting the over on a New England Patriots, like you

0:15:35.520 --> 0:15:38.480
<v Speaker 1>tend to end up winning. But it's not like you're

0:15:38.480 --> 0:15:41.120
<v Speaker 1>going to slam dunk be in the driver's seat like

0:15:41.160 --> 0:15:44.120
<v Speaker 1>the whole way through. There's times when it's close towards

0:15:44.120 --> 0:15:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the end of the season. Um, but the schedule definitely

0:15:47.840 --> 0:15:50.720
<v Speaker 1>is very valuable for them to have so many difficult

0:15:50.760 --> 0:15:54.320
<v Speaker 1>games at home and games that there should have pretty

0:15:54.320 --> 0:15:57.040
<v Speaker 1>good success with on the road. Lauren, hang out for

0:15:57.080 --> 0:15:58.760
<v Speaker 1>one second. I want to get to a few more

0:15:58.760 --> 0:16:01.240
<v Speaker 1>of these, just three more of these, one of which

0:16:01.440 --> 0:16:05.240
<v Speaker 1>has to do with teams who schedule eases up the

0:16:05.280 --> 0:16:08.040
<v Speaker 1>most from last year based on efficiency to this year

0:16:08.360 --> 0:16:12.280
<v Speaker 1>forecast strength of schedule based on wind totals. Also want

0:16:12.320 --> 0:16:14.600
<v Speaker 1>to talk about the New York Giants for Giants fans

0:16:14.600 --> 0:16:18.560
<v Speaker 1>out there. Warren Sharp at Sharp Football on Twitter right

0:16:18.560 --> 0:16:20.920
<v Speaker 1>here on a numbers game at Visa. Support for today's

0:16:20.920 --> 0:16:24.360
<v Speaker 1>show has always comes from book maker dot EU and

0:16:24.520 --> 0:16:27.400
<v Speaker 1>industry leader for close to thirty years now. Pro players

0:16:27.440 --> 0:16:30.400
<v Speaker 1>consider them a must because of the holy trinity my

0:16:30.480 --> 0:16:33.240
<v Speaker 1>words out there's their first to post dods. They take

0:16:33.280 --> 0:16:36.760
<v Speaker 1>the highest limits and they pride themselves on never having

0:16:36.880 --> 0:16:40.200
<v Speaker 1>kicked out a winning player. That is the trifecta you

0:16:40.280 --> 0:16:42.560
<v Speaker 1>are looking for, and it is rare believe me. They're

0:16:42.600 --> 0:16:45.200
<v Speaker 1>high volume sports book best suited for the sophisticated player

0:16:45.240 --> 0:16:47.880
<v Speaker 1>who understands sports betted, but they also cater to large

0:16:47.880 --> 0:16:50.800
<v Speaker 1>recreational players as well, and their motto remains as it

0:16:50.880 --> 0:16:54.200
<v Speaker 1>always has been, where the lines originate, because chances are,

0:16:54.200 --> 0:16:56.320
<v Speaker 1>wherever you're playing right now, whatever that sports book is,

0:16:56.800 --> 0:17:01.680
<v Speaker 1>they got their lines from bookmaker. There following Bookmaker's lines

0:17:01.920 --> 0:17:04.040
<v Speaker 1>and right now, if you visit bookmaker dot you slash

0:17:04.080 --> 0:17:06.600
<v Speaker 1>gill Let's Bookmaker dot E slash g I l L

0:17:07.080 --> 0:17:09.600
<v Speaker 1>you can claim an exclusive welcome bonus of up to

0:17:09.680 --> 0:17:13.359
<v Speaker 1>three hundred dollars. That's Bookmaker dot E slash Gill to

0:17:13.520 --> 0:17:15.480
<v Speaker 1>join and claim your welcome bonus of up to three

0:17:15.520 --> 0:17:18.159
<v Speaker 1>hundred dollars right now. They're a key cog in my

0:17:18.280 --> 0:17:20.960
<v Speaker 1>betting arsenal. They are a key cog in anyone that

0:17:21.080 --> 0:17:24.640
<v Speaker 1>I know who bets seriously in their arsenal as well.

0:17:25.080 --> 0:17:28.879
<v Speaker 1>Book Maker dot EU slash Gil. Check it out. You

0:17:28.920 --> 0:17:31.600
<v Speaker 1>will thank me later. Down back to a numbers game

0:17:31.640 --> 0:17:34.960
<v Speaker 1>with your host, Gil Alexander, broadcasting live from our Visa

0:17:34.960 --> 0:17:37.520
<v Speaker 1>in studios in Las Vegas. It is a numbers game

0:17:37.600 --> 0:17:39.960
<v Speaker 1>right here where sports betting analytics live right here on

0:17:40.200 --> 0:17:43.639
<v Speaker 1>Visa actionable sports betting information. And again honored to have

0:17:43.680 --> 0:17:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Warren Sharp on the show once again our special offseason

0:17:47.320 --> 0:17:49.720
<v Speaker 1>Warren Sharp Appearances. We'll do it again when the uh,

0:17:50.160 --> 0:17:53.000
<v Speaker 1>the actual calendar, the schedule comes out where we know

0:17:53.000 --> 0:17:55.520
<v Speaker 1>who's playing which team in which particular week, and then

0:17:55.560 --> 0:17:58.200
<v Speaker 1>we can break it down through Warren's lens in terms

0:17:58.200 --> 0:18:01.400
<v Speaker 1>of what teams start with har schedules, what teams start

0:18:01.400 --> 0:18:05.080
<v Speaker 1>with these schedules, what teams play tough defenses or are

0:18:05.119 --> 0:18:08.320
<v Speaker 1>easy past defenses will parse it out unit by unit

0:18:08.920 --> 0:18:11.560
<v Speaker 1>at that point. Uh So, Warren, I'm throwing that out

0:18:11.600 --> 0:18:15.119
<v Speaker 1>there for a later summertime appearance, if you would, because

0:18:15.160 --> 0:18:19.639
<v Speaker 1>that would be fun to break down. Always good. I

0:18:19.720 --> 0:18:22.200
<v Speaker 1>like that. Let's let's conclude what we have here though

0:18:22.280 --> 0:18:26.560
<v Speaker 1>from you. Uh this one also from yesterday again CG

0:18:26.680 --> 0:18:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Technology putting out our first season win totals of the

0:18:29.480 --> 0:18:31.879
<v Speaker 1>football season here in Las Vegas. They did so on

0:18:32.000 --> 0:18:38.120
<v Speaker 1>March thirty one. Let's let's start with this one here, um,

0:18:38.200 --> 0:18:41.840
<v Speaker 1>which has to do with comparing actual strength schedule based

0:18:41.880 --> 0:18:45.919
<v Speaker 1>on efficiency versus forecast strength of schedule based on wind totals.

0:18:45.960 --> 0:18:51.040
<v Speaker 1>The teams who schedule eases up the most, right. So

0:18:51.119 --> 0:18:53.199
<v Speaker 1>this is another kind of you know, I'm I'm a

0:18:53.640 --> 0:18:56.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm a geek about trying to analyze things that other

0:18:56.480 --> 0:18:58.560
<v Speaker 1>people aren't looking at. Number one, you can find a

0:18:58.600 --> 0:19:01.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of edges that way, and number two, it's fun

0:19:01.920 --> 0:19:04.359
<v Speaker 1>to talk about, fun to share the types of revelations.

0:19:04.440 --> 0:19:06.320
<v Speaker 1>So one of the things that I definitely like to

0:19:06.320 --> 0:19:11.440
<v Speaker 1>look at is how does the schedule look at this

0:19:11.560 --> 0:19:15.880
<v Speaker 1>point heading into ten compared to what the teams faced

0:19:16.040 --> 0:19:19.119
<v Speaker 1>last year? And we know what their actual strength of

0:19:19.160 --> 0:19:21.880
<v Speaker 1>schedule was last year, so we're not using forecasted win

0:19:21.960 --> 0:19:24.760
<v Speaker 1>totals here. We're looking at what are they actually play

0:19:24.880 --> 0:19:27.359
<v Speaker 1>last year and then what are we forecasting for this

0:19:27.480 --> 0:19:30.840
<v Speaker 1>upcoming year. And so the teams that who schedule, the

0:19:30.840 --> 0:19:34.280
<v Speaker 1>top five teams to schedule eases up the most. Number

0:19:34.280 --> 0:19:38.200
<v Speaker 1>one is the Cleveland Browns. Number two is the Cincinnati Bengals.

0:19:38.440 --> 0:19:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Number three the Pittsburgh Steelers. Then you have the Buffalo

0:19:41.640 --> 0:19:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Bills and the Philadelphia Eagles. So the Cleveland Browns, the Bengals,

0:19:45.640 --> 0:19:48.240
<v Speaker 1>and the Steelers, those teams obviously are all in the

0:19:48.280 --> 0:19:51.199
<v Speaker 1>a f C North. So their schedule in terms of

0:19:51.240 --> 0:19:54.920
<v Speaker 1>a non divisional schedule, the two divisions that you play,

0:19:54.920 --> 0:19:57.760
<v Speaker 1>because you always play your own division, you play a

0:19:57.800 --> 0:20:01.119
<v Speaker 1>division within your conference. That's the total separate division, right,

0:20:01.160 --> 0:20:03.720
<v Speaker 1>So in this case, instead of the a f C North,

0:20:03.800 --> 0:20:06.119
<v Speaker 1>you're playing one of the other three divisions in your conference,

0:20:06.119 --> 0:20:09.120
<v Speaker 1>and then you're playing a division in the other conference

0:20:09.200 --> 0:20:12.000
<v Speaker 1>over the NFC to all of these teams will play

0:20:12.040 --> 0:20:16.000
<v Speaker 1>those same opponents, and so that schedule, that non division

0:20:16.040 --> 0:20:19.080
<v Speaker 1>schedule eases up tremendously for the a f C North

0:20:19.200 --> 0:20:22.200
<v Speaker 1>compared to last year. If you look at the five

0:20:22.200 --> 0:20:25.560
<v Speaker 1>teams with the most difficult scheduling increases, the team that

0:20:25.800 --> 0:20:29.119
<v Speaker 1>to schedule is going to be much more difficult compared

0:20:29.160 --> 0:20:32.640
<v Speaker 1>to what it was last season. The Houston Texans are

0:20:32.640 --> 0:20:34.800
<v Speaker 1>the first. They obviously have the number one overall schedule.

0:20:34.840 --> 0:20:37.719
<v Speaker 1>Their schedule gets much more difficult compared to what it

0:20:37.800 --> 0:20:42.200
<v Speaker 1>was last year based upon final end the season Drinker schedule.

0:20:42.640 --> 0:20:47.800
<v Speaker 1>The Chicago Bears, the Indianapolis called, the Minnesota Vikings, and

0:20:47.840 --> 0:20:50.160
<v Speaker 1>the Green Bay Packers. So once again you've got three

0:20:50.240 --> 0:20:54.880
<v Speaker 1>teams from the NFC North who's opposing divisional schedule from

0:20:54.960 --> 0:20:58.280
<v Speaker 1>other divisions is going to get substantially more difficult, which

0:20:58.280 --> 0:21:00.879
<v Speaker 1>is why all three of those teams schedule gets much

0:21:00.920 --> 0:21:04.440
<v Speaker 1>more difficult for the upcoming season compared to last year. Yeah,

0:21:04.600 --> 0:21:08.240
<v Speaker 1>so easiest Cleveland, Cincinnati, Pittsburgh, Buffalo, Philly in terms of

0:21:08.240 --> 0:21:10.800
<v Speaker 1>whose schedules is up the most. And his Warren just said, uh,

0:21:10.920 --> 0:21:13.640
<v Speaker 1>the team's whose schedule gets the hardest compared to last

0:21:13.720 --> 0:21:19.240
<v Speaker 1>year Houston. There they are Chicago, Indianapolis, Minnesota, and Green Bay.

0:21:19.440 --> 0:21:22.560
<v Speaker 1>So this has been an off season for the Ages, Warren,

0:21:22.680 --> 0:21:25.240
<v Speaker 1>for the New York Football Giants, And by that I mean,

0:21:26.040 --> 0:21:29.920
<v Speaker 1>a horrific off season for the Ages. But you might

0:21:29.960 --> 0:21:33.639
<v Speaker 1>have some good news for them here. Well, yeah, the

0:21:33.680 --> 0:21:37.840
<v Speaker 1>good I mean the good news, uh, respectively, is that

0:21:38.200 --> 0:21:41.880
<v Speaker 1>they have the fourth easiest schedule and they do face

0:21:41.960 --> 0:21:44.560
<v Speaker 1>seven bottom ten opponents, which is the second most of

0:21:44.600 --> 0:21:48.240
<v Speaker 1>any team in the league this upcoming year. The problem,

0:21:48.320 --> 0:21:50.960
<v Speaker 1>the trouble for the New York Giants, of course, is

0:21:51.000 --> 0:21:53.200
<v Speaker 1>the fact that while they have the fourth easiest schedule

0:21:53.280 --> 0:21:55.879
<v Speaker 1>this year, last year they had the seventh schedule and

0:21:55.920 --> 0:21:58.720
<v Speaker 1>they won only five games, so they still had a

0:21:58.840 --> 0:22:02.360
<v Speaker 1>very bad record last season. They're still projected to win

0:22:02.400 --> 0:22:05.800
<v Speaker 1>based on the pure wind totals the fourth fewest games

0:22:05.840 --> 0:22:08.040
<v Speaker 1>this year is their win total set at six minus

0:22:08.040 --> 0:22:11.080
<v Speaker 1>one ten um. And you know they also were with

0:22:11.160 --> 0:22:14.840
<v Speaker 1>are without Odell Beckham um. In addition, if you look

0:22:14.880 --> 0:22:19.160
<v Speaker 1>at the team who's playing opponents that are typically better

0:22:19.200 --> 0:22:22.359
<v Speaker 1>than them, um, you're gonna see, well, maybe we're trailing

0:22:22.400 --> 0:22:24.639
<v Speaker 1>in the second half. And when Eli last year was

0:22:24.680 --> 0:22:27.919
<v Speaker 1>trailing in the second half, his success rate on passes

0:22:28.640 --> 0:22:31.720
<v Speaker 1>was thirty one out of thirty four qualifying quarterbacks. The

0:22:31.760 --> 0:22:34.520
<v Speaker 1>only three quarterbacks that were worse than him. We're all rookies.

0:22:35.119 --> 0:22:37.840
<v Speaker 1>Josh Rose and Josh Allen and Sam Donald. The other

0:22:37.920 --> 0:22:39.719
<v Speaker 1>thing that I will say that I haven't put up

0:22:39.720 --> 0:22:41.760
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter yet but I've been working on this morning

0:22:42.240 --> 0:22:45.880
<v Speaker 1>is a depiction looking at games that a team will

0:22:45.920 --> 0:22:49.200
<v Speaker 1>face this upcoming season, where they are better than their

0:22:49.240 --> 0:22:53.600
<v Speaker 1>opponent based upon just the pure forecasted wind total. They're

0:22:53.800 --> 0:22:57.359
<v Speaker 1>forecasted to be a stronger team, not looking at power rankings,

0:22:57.400 --> 0:23:00.200
<v Speaker 1>look at what the oddsmakers put out here is stronger team,

0:23:00.320 --> 0:23:03.080
<v Speaker 1>and then comparing that to last year based upon what

0:23:03.119 --> 0:23:05.960
<v Speaker 1>the spreads were in the actual games. What was the

0:23:06.040 --> 0:23:08.119
<v Speaker 1>spread on these games, and how many games were they

0:23:08.440 --> 0:23:11.240
<v Speaker 1>lined as a better team than their opponent. Obviously, that

0:23:11.280 --> 0:23:13.160
<v Speaker 1>means you could still be an underdog, but if you're

0:23:13.200 --> 0:23:15.760
<v Speaker 1>one point underdog on the road, you're technically better than

0:23:15.760 --> 0:23:18.040
<v Speaker 1>that other team because you're on the road, and so

0:23:18.240 --> 0:23:21.080
<v Speaker 1>you're obviously the superior team at one point underdog. So

0:23:21.320 --> 0:23:23.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm backing all that in and what we find there

0:23:23.720 --> 0:23:26.720
<v Speaker 1>is that the New York Giants last year was forecast

0:23:26.800 --> 0:23:29.400
<v Speaker 1>to be better than their opponent in just two games.

0:23:29.800 --> 0:23:32.760
<v Speaker 1>This year better than their opponent in just two games.

0:23:32.760 --> 0:23:36.120
<v Speaker 1>So the only good part is they play an easier schedule,

0:23:36.320 --> 0:23:38.199
<v Speaker 1>But the bad part is they play the easy schedule

0:23:38.320 --> 0:23:40.440
<v Speaker 1>last year and the only fake two teams that's their

0:23:40.480 --> 0:23:44.239
<v Speaker 1>forecasts to be better than. So there's that basically New

0:23:44.320 --> 0:23:48.919
<v Speaker 1>York Giants fans, that's not fun. As again one of

0:23:48.920 --> 0:23:52.680
<v Speaker 1>the more strange offseasons, and strange is being kind one

0:23:52.720 --> 0:23:56.320
<v Speaker 1>of the most perplexing off seasons you will ever find.

0:23:56.880 --> 0:24:00.560
<v Speaker 1>With the NFL Draft now later this month, can finally

0:24:00.600 --> 0:24:03.320
<v Speaker 1>say that later this month the NFL Draft coming. Last

0:24:03.359 --> 0:24:05.320
<v Speaker 1>one here, Warren. I guess we've kind of covered this

0:24:05.359 --> 0:24:07.719
<v Speaker 1>one in different ways, but the last one here is

0:24:08.000 --> 0:24:10.520
<v Speaker 1>two teams that face just one top five opponent, two

0:24:10.520 --> 0:24:14.360
<v Speaker 1>teams that face four top five opponents last one here.

0:24:16.119 --> 0:24:19.560
<v Speaker 1>So the Philadelphia Eagles in the New England Patriots are

0:24:19.600 --> 0:24:22.679
<v Speaker 1>both fortunate in that. Like you can, the way I

0:24:22.680 --> 0:24:25.200
<v Speaker 1>look at these things is you look at each game individually,

0:24:25.200 --> 0:24:27.440
<v Speaker 1>and you can find the teams that play the top

0:24:27.480 --> 0:24:29.520
<v Speaker 1>five or top ten teams, the teams that are supposed

0:24:29.520 --> 0:24:31.800
<v Speaker 1>to be the best in the NFL this season, and

0:24:31.880 --> 0:24:33.520
<v Speaker 1>teams that are supposed to be the worst. And that's

0:24:33.520 --> 0:24:35.440
<v Speaker 1>one of the things the strength of schedule that's useful.

0:24:35.680 --> 0:24:38.280
<v Speaker 1>As you probably know, Gil, it's not about evaluating all

0:24:38.320 --> 0:24:41.280
<v Speaker 1>this team is eleventh versus seventeenth, and so, oh my god,

0:24:41.320 --> 0:24:43.520
<v Speaker 1>you know this team's got much easier schedule. No, it's

0:24:43.560 --> 0:24:46.480
<v Speaker 1>looking at the extremes. Look at the extremes of the schedule.

0:24:46.480 --> 0:24:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Which are the teams that have the five easiest schedules,

0:24:49.119 --> 0:24:51.360
<v Speaker 1>What are the teams that have the five most difficult schedules,

0:24:51.480 --> 0:24:54.199
<v Speaker 1>And which are the best, five, best or worst teams

0:24:54.200 --> 0:24:56.160
<v Speaker 1>based upon these wind totals, and those are the ones

0:24:56.160 --> 0:24:59.119
<v Speaker 1>that we should feel pretty confident about. The Patriots and

0:24:59.160 --> 0:25:02.120
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles both face just one top five team this year,

0:25:02.400 --> 0:25:05.480
<v Speaker 1>but they get to play five games against bottom five opponents,

0:25:05.480 --> 0:25:07.479
<v Speaker 1>the worst of the worst of the NFL. But there

0:25:07.480 --> 0:25:10.119
<v Speaker 1>are five games that they should win. Um, then you

0:25:10.119 --> 0:25:14.159
<v Speaker 1>go to the team teams that face strong opponents, strong

0:25:14.280 --> 0:25:17.359
<v Speaker 1>top five opponents. There's two teams to play four of

0:25:17.440 --> 0:25:20.280
<v Speaker 1>those top five opponents, and they play none of the

0:25:20.320 --> 0:25:22.840
<v Speaker 1>worst teams, none of the bottom five opponents. Those two

0:25:22.880 --> 0:25:26.000
<v Speaker 1>teams are the Texans and the Broncos. So Patriots and

0:25:26.080 --> 0:25:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Eagles justifiably and easy scheduled, large part made much easier

0:25:30.520 --> 0:25:33.200
<v Speaker 1>by the fact play very few top teams, a lot

0:25:33.200 --> 0:25:35.840
<v Speaker 1>of bottom teams, and the Texans the Broncos, the two

0:25:35.840 --> 0:25:38.480
<v Speaker 1>most difficult schedules in the NFL play some of the

0:25:38.560 --> 0:25:43.560
<v Speaker 1>most difficult opponents, very two easy opponents, very many very

0:25:43.560 --> 0:25:46.960
<v Speaker 1>difficult opponents. And the interesting court here is that looking

0:25:46.960 --> 0:25:49.600
<v Speaker 1>back at I went back and looked at those schedules,

0:25:49.640 --> 0:25:51.840
<v Speaker 1>there was not a single team at this point in

0:25:51.880 --> 0:25:54.400
<v Speaker 1>the season that had the same type of benefit where

0:25:54.640 --> 0:25:56.640
<v Speaker 1>they play a lot of easy teams at the top

0:25:56.680 --> 0:25:59.280
<v Speaker 1>and no hard teams, or a lot of hard teams

0:25:59.280 --> 0:26:01.520
<v Speaker 1>and no easy team. There wasn't a team that fell

0:26:01.560 --> 0:26:04.040
<v Speaker 1>into those categories last year, and here this season we

0:26:04.119 --> 0:26:06.200
<v Speaker 1>got two teams on the easy end and two teams

0:26:06.240 --> 0:26:08.560
<v Speaker 1>on the hard end. All of this can be seen

0:26:08.720 --> 0:26:12.480
<v Speaker 1>on Warren's Twitter at sharp Football. Just an absolutely great follow.

0:26:12.560 --> 0:26:14.000
<v Speaker 1>By the way, again, if you want to watch the

0:26:14.119 --> 0:26:16.840
<v Speaker 1>if you want to look at the Seawan Taylor montage

0:26:17.000 --> 0:26:19.919
<v Speaker 1>that I talked about yesterday on the what would have

0:26:19.920 --> 0:26:22.119
<v Speaker 1>been Sean Taylor's thirty six birthday, you can check that

0:26:22.119 --> 0:26:23.879
<v Speaker 1>out of chart Football as well. But all those stats

0:26:23.880 --> 0:26:25.800
<v Speaker 1>that we talked about not only at chart Football, they're

0:26:25.800 --> 0:26:28.760
<v Speaker 1>also at Shart football stats dot com. Warren, we'll talk

0:26:28.800 --> 0:26:30.840
<v Speaker 1>to you again this summer again when the schedule comes

0:26:30.880 --> 0:26:33.520
<v Speaker 1>out week one, week two, week three, and that in

0:26:33.520 --> 0:26:36.560
<v Speaker 1>that fashion. Uh. In the meantime, crack and I miss

0:26:36.560 --> 0:26:38.600
<v Speaker 1>you a lot on Thursdays. Are you gonna have a

0:26:38.640 --> 0:26:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Pro Football guide this year? Like? Do you have time

0:26:40.840 --> 0:26:44.800
<v Speaker 1>to do a preview guide anymore? I? I am. That's

0:26:44.840 --> 0:26:48.520
<v Speaker 1>the current plan. I'm looking forward to doing that, really excited.

0:26:48.600 --> 0:26:52.720
<v Speaker 1>Actually left my engineering job officially, so I'm gonna be

0:26:52.760 --> 0:26:55.360
<v Speaker 1>able to pursue some of these other things. Uh three

0:26:55.440 --> 0:26:58.240
<v Speaker 1>up a little bit more time. So the guide is on.

0:26:58.840 --> 0:27:02.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm working on it as we speaking. That tends tends

0:27:02.320 --> 0:27:04.200
<v Speaker 1>to come out right at the very end of June,

0:27:04.480 --> 0:27:06.160
<v Speaker 1>right at the very end of June. We look forward

0:27:06.200 --> 0:27:09.680
<v Speaker 1>to it. Warren Sharp's Pro Football Preview Guide Warren, thank

0:27:09.680 --> 0:27:14.720
<v Speaker 1>you man, appreciate it and congratulations on all. Thanks Warren Sharp,

0:27:15.240 --> 0:27:19.720
<v Speaker 1>best in the biz, football analytics. His future Jeff to say,

0:27:19.720 --> 0:27:21.439
<v Speaker 1>the least, as bright as could be.