WEBVTT - John Collison

0:00:03.160 --> 0:00:10.959
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. So my idea for

0:00:11.000 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 1>you guys is you guys just have like regular normal,

0:00:13.720 --> 0:00:16.079
<v Speaker 1>boring ads on the podcast. I think you need to

0:00:16.120 --> 0:00:19.480
<v Speaker 1>do the post red ads for yeah, say a lot

0:00:19.520 --> 0:00:21.880
<v Speaker 1>that everything in securities, frauds is having a bad night

0:00:21.960 --> 0:00:25.279
<v Speaker 1>sleep securities for us.

0:00:25.400 --> 0:00:27.640
<v Speaker 2>Well, like I could do like the men's shaving club

0:00:27.840 --> 0:00:29.800
<v Speaker 2>ads or something that could be fun too.

0:00:29.840 --> 0:00:33.840
<v Speaker 1>When buying short data out of the money called out right, Yeah,

0:00:33.920 --> 0:00:34.640
<v Speaker 1>I think we good.

0:00:35.600 --> 0:00:38.479
<v Speaker 3>Hello and welcome to The Money Stuff Podcast. I'm Matt Levine,

0:00:38.680 --> 0:00:40.720
<v Speaker 3>I read The Money Stuff Colm at Bloomberg.

0:00:40.400 --> 0:00:43.720
<v Speaker 2>Opinion, and I'm Katie Greifeld, a reporter for Bloomberg News

0:00:43.720 --> 0:00:45.360
<v Speaker 2>and an anchor for Bloomberg Television.

0:00:45.800 --> 0:00:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Katy.

0:00:46.120 --> 0:00:48.839
<v Speaker 3>Today we're doing something new. We're doing our first interview

0:00:48.840 --> 0:00:49.920
<v Speaker 3>on The Money Stuff Podcast.

0:00:50.000 --> 0:00:52.479
<v Speaker 2>Are you nervous, I'm pretty nervous. I'm a little bit

0:00:52.520 --> 0:00:53.080
<v Speaker 2>nervous too.

0:00:53.240 --> 0:00:55.760
<v Speaker 3>We're recording this after it happens, and we're not really nervous.

0:00:56.960 --> 0:00:57.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm still stressed out.

0:00:57.920 --> 0:00:59.440
<v Speaker 1>To speak for yourself, I'm pretty nervous.

0:00:59.440 --> 0:01:02.040
<v Speaker 3>I haven't listened to it yet. Today our guest is

0:01:02.120 --> 0:01:06.080
<v Speaker 3>John Collinson. Stripe is a payments and financial technology company,

0:01:06.520 --> 0:01:09.240
<v Speaker 3>and John and his brother and co founder Patrick are

0:01:09.360 --> 0:01:11.280
<v Speaker 3>kind of tech industry celebrities.

0:01:11.800 --> 0:01:16.199
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he's an Irish billionaire. He's from Limerick. That's cool.

0:01:16.600 --> 0:01:18.959
<v Speaker 3>Katy's wearing her Limerick jacket, but we'll probably get into

0:01:18.959 --> 0:01:19.840
<v Speaker 3>that during the podcast.

0:01:19.880 --> 0:01:22.200
<v Speaker 2>That's true. It's a little embarrassing.

0:01:21.720 --> 0:01:24.280
<v Speaker 3>That I wore this medium amount of embarrassing.

0:01:24.480 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 2>I truly didn't mean to, but as I said to

0:01:27.160 --> 0:01:29.680
<v Speaker 2>you in our office, it was forty seven degrees when

0:01:29.720 --> 0:01:32.520
<v Speaker 2>I left my apartment this morning, pre dawn, and I

0:01:32.560 --> 0:01:36.759
<v Speaker 2>needed a top. And this is my favorite medium weight jacket.

0:01:37.360 --> 0:01:39.800
<v Speaker 3>This is the behind the scenes content that my stuff

0:01:39.800 --> 0:01:43.800
<v Speaker 3>podcast listener is really grave. Yeah, let's jump right back

0:01:43.800 --> 0:01:46.800
<v Speaker 3>into that Internet failed it should I do like a

0:01:46.840 --> 0:01:49.640
<v Speaker 3>crashing transition to talking about striper?

0:01:50.840 --> 0:01:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so how do you guys usually start these? How

0:01:52.440 --> 0:01:53.520
<v Speaker 1>do you one? I guess you haven't done that, You

0:01:53.560 --> 0:01:56.120
<v Speaker 1>haven't done that, you could invent the forduct. Yes, start

0:01:56.160 --> 0:01:59.000
<v Speaker 1>by review of the advertisements I've heard the podcast.

0:01:59.160 --> 0:02:02.600
<v Speaker 3>We start the podcas us with much like this. We

0:02:02.640 --> 0:02:06.160
<v Speaker 3>walk into the room and bullshit a bit and then

0:02:06.320 --> 0:02:09.680
<v Speaker 3>record that. Yeah, and then we eventually say hello and

0:02:09.720 --> 0:02:11.800
<v Speaker 3>welcome to the Money Stuff Podcast. Then we talk about

0:02:11.800 --> 0:02:13.760
<v Speaker 3>whatever the thing we're talking about today. So now we're

0:02:13.760 --> 0:02:18.160
<v Speaker 3>talking about stribe, capital markets, Yeah, destiny tech. Okay, So

0:02:18.320 --> 0:02:20.760
<v Speaker 3>listens in podcasts with you, you talk a lot about

0:02:21.040 --> 0:02:23.760
<v Speaker 3>your interest in business history and like you've learned from

0:02:24.040 --> 0:02:26.079
<v Speaker 3>the tech companies of the past and the conglomerates of

0:02:26.120 --> 0:02:29.600
<v Speaker 3>the conglomerate wave. I have not heard you talk about

0:02:29.720 --> 0:02:32.800
<v Speaker 3>the lessons you've learned from financial services companies. And I

0:02:32.840 --> 0:02:36.000
<v Speaker 3>write about finance and think of Stripe in many ways

0:02:36.120 --> 0:02:39.440
<v Speaker 3>as like a financial services esque company here, like some

0:02:39.480 --> 0:02:42.400
<v Speaker 3>evolution to a financial services company. So I'm curious, like,

0:02:42.800 --> 0:02:44.840
<v Speaker 3>I don't know we you think about financial services.

0:02:45.639 --> 0:02:48.799
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, in general, we try to learn a lot from

0:02:48.919 --> 0:02:52.120
<v Speaker 1>other businesses. And Okay, one things I really like is

0:02:52.120 --> 0:02:54.760
<v Speaker 1>we live in a golden age of learning about other

0:02:54.800 --> 0:02:57.280
<v Speaker 1>businesses right now. And one of the reasons I like

0:02:57.360 --> 0:03:00.520
<v Speaker 1>this is because I think learning about other businesses at

0:03:00.560 --> 0:03:04.320
<v Speaker 1>some level learning about the world or certainly the economy,

0:03:04.520 --> 0:03:07.000
<v Speaker 1>because you know, you're getting sense for how all the

0:03:07.080 --> 0:03:11.720
<v Speaker 1>various entities work together. With financial services in particular, you

0:03:11.760 --> 0:03:14.280
<v Speaker 1>came up with the framing that you know, Stripe is

0:03:14.280 --> 0:03:16.359
<v Speaker 1>in a way kind of a new kind of scaled

0:03:16.400 --> 0:03:18.680
<v Speaker 1>investment bank. Was it you're framing I think?

0:03:18.720 --> 0:03:21.280
<v Speaker 3>I said, yeah, yeah, but I would love for you

0:03:21.360 --> 0:03:23.120
<v Speaker 3>to tell me that's right, but I'm assuming you'll tell

0:03:23.120 --> 0:03:23.600
<v Speaker 3>me it's wrong.

0:03:23.800 --> 0:03:25.960
<v Speaker 1>No. I actually kind of like it because if you

0:03:25.960 --> 0:03:28.200
<v Speaker 1>think about what are the potential source of funding for

0:03:28.200 --> 0:03:29.720
<v Speaker 1>a business, Like, if you want to scale off a business,

0:03:29.720 --> 0:03:31.120
<v Speaker 1>how can you fund it? There's three ways you can

0:03:31.160 --> 0:03:33.480
<v Speaker 1>fund a business. You can do it through debt, equity,

0:03:33.840 --> 0:03:36.800
<v Speaker 1>or retain earnings. And so if you just tick through

0:03:36.840 --> 0:03:39.840
<v Speaker 1>each one of those on the earning side, maybe that's

0:03:39.840 --> 0:03:42.000
<v Speaker 1>the place where a Stripe is kind of the most

0:03:42.000 --> 0:03:45.440
<v Speaker 1>directly doing this, where we're making it easier for businesses

0:03:45.480 --> 0:03:48.600
<v Speaker 1>to self fund their growth. And we see tons of

0:03:48.640 --> 0:03:52.200
<v Speaker 1>bootstrapped or kind of certainly airly monetizing businesses on the Stripe,

0:03:52.320 --> 0:03:54.600
<v Speaker 1>like with this customer and Stripe Photo Room, and they

0:03:54.600 --> 0:03:57.760
<v Speaker 1>do online kind of GENI powered photo editing. They're based

0:03:57.800 --> 0:04:00.280
<v Speaker 1>in France, and you know, maybe ten years ago they

0:04:00.320 --> 0:04:02.080
<v Speaker 1>would have you know, raised a whole bunch of VC

0:04:02.200 --> 0:04:04.280
<v Speaker 1>and scaled up that way. They're actually profitable within a

0:04:04.360 --> 0:04:07.200
<v Speaker 1>year and they've just kind of scaled up profitably since then.

0:04:07.480 --> 0:04:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Ninety eight percent of their business comes from outside France

0:04:09.760 --> 0:04:11.200
<v Speaker 1>and so they're kind of selling this product to a

0:04:11.240 --> 0:04:13.400
<v Speaker 1>global audience and stripes making it easy to do that.

0:04:13.640 --> 0:04:15.400
<v Speaker 1>And we've seen that in general, I guess the AI

0:04:15.520 --> 0:04:19.159
<v Speaker 1>companies in particular, where you know, during the social media boom,

0:04:19.520 --> 0:04:23.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe companies scaled up first with raising lots of VC

0:04:23.120 --> 0:04:25.719
<v Speaker 1>dollars and then later on figured out monetization. With a

0:04:25.720 --> 0:04:27.599
<v Speaker 1>lot of the AI companies, you know, open the eye

0:04:27.600 --> 0:04:30.200
<v Speaker 1>perplexity clause, you know, the photo room who I was mentioning,

0:04:30.360 --> 0:04:33.280
<v Speaker 1>they actually monetized from pretty early on using stripe, and

0:04:33.320 --> 0:04:34.440
<v Speaker 1>so that's one source of funding.

0:04:35.160 --> 0:04:39.840
<v Speaker 3>Stripe allows early stage companies to monetize so efficiently that

0:04:39.880 --> 0:04:41.800
<v Speaker 3>like there is less need for data and equity in

0:04:41.839 --> 0:04:44.960
<v Speaker 3>the world because companies can sell fund like you're putting

0:04:45.040 --> 0:04:46.000
<v Speaker 3>vcs out of business.

0:04:46.200 --> 0:04:49.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and obviously we think it's a more slightly more

0:04:50.360 --> 0:04:53.800
<v Speaker 1>healthy dynamic for the businesses. A classic trap that early

0:04:53.839 --> 0:04:57.640
<v Speaker 1>stage companies fall into is you know, and why combinators

0:04:57.680 --> 0:05:00.440
<v Speaker 1>say tries to get their companies to avoid falling into

0:05:00.440 --> 0:05:02.680
<v Speaker 1>this failure mode is kind of they raise money and

0:05:02.720 --> 0:05:05.720
<v Speaker 1>then they think kind of valuation milestones or any kind

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:08.719
<v Speaker 1>of financial or investor milestones are the milestones that matter

0:05:08.760 --> 0:05:10.320
<v Speaker 1>for the business, whereas obviously that's not the case. It's

0:05:10.320 --> 0:05:11.960
<v Speaker 1>are you building something of value in the world which

0:05:12.000 --> 0:05:14.560
<v Speaker 1>will generally be measured by does anyone want to buy it?

0:05:14.600 --> 0:05:16.280
<v Speaker 1>And so I think maybe it gets people on the

0:05:16.320 --> 0:05:19.240
<v Speaker 1>right leaderboard earlier on, where a revenue leader board is

0:05:19.279 --> 0:05:21.440
<v Speaker 1>just a much healthier leaderboard to be thinking about than

0:05:21.480 --> 0:05:24.200
<v Speaker 1>a fundraising valuation leaderboard. But we also play in the

0:05:24.240 --> 0:05:27.080
<v Speaker 1>other parts of the capital stack, where on the debt side.

0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:29.839
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you guys have probably watched this, but banks

0:05:30.160 --> 0:05:32.120
<v Speaker 1>have kind of gotten out of the SMB lending space

0:05:32.279 --> 0:05:35.000
<v Speaker 1>since the financial crisis, as just the compliance costs have

0:05:35.040 --> 0:05:36.720
<v Speaker 1>gone up, Like people do not go to a bank

0:05:36.800 --> 0:05:39.320
<v Speaker 1>for a five thousand dollars loan anymore, and so we

0:05:39.400 --> 0:05:44.599
<v Speaker 1>now lend through our lending partners billions of dollars to startups.

0:05:44.640 --> 0:05:48.080
<v Speaker 1>We do that entirely programmatically through amount models, you know,

0:05:48.160 --> 0:05:49.840
<v Speaker 1>cash flow based lending. So we're not looking at the

0:05:49.839 --> 0:05:52.200
<v Speaker 1>balance sheet, We're not trying to do credit checks on

0:05:52.240 --> 0:05:54.359
<v Speaker 1>the individual or something like that. We're looking at the

0:05:54.360 --> 0:05:57.160
<v Speaker 1>stream of cash flows. Is it a healthy, reliable stream

0:05:57.200 --> 0:05:59.039
<v Speaker 1>of cash flows that can support some debt?

0:05:59.640 --> 0:06:02.440
<v Speaker 3>You're doing the cash flows you can see exactly.

0:06:02.440 --> 0:06:04.400
<v Speaker 1>We see the cash flows and people repay out of

0:06:04.400 --> 0:06:06.599
<v Speaker 1>the stripe cash flows, and so that is a new

0:06:06.800 --> 0:06:09.479
<v Speaker 1>kind of lending product that exists in the market. That

0:06:09.720 --> 0:06:11.360
<v Speaker 1>now again is you know, in the billions of dollars

0:06:11.400 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the debt we're providing. It's kind of

0:06:13.240 --> 0:06:14.719
<v Speaker 1>ironic in a way. If you want to raise one

0:06:14.760 --> 0:06:17.119
<v Speaker 1>hundred million dollars of debt, that is a very competitive market.

0:06:17.160 --> 0:06:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Lots of people are playing in that. If you want

0:06:18.960 --> 0:06:22.640
<v Speaker 1>to raise five thousand dollars of debt for your company,

0:06:22.800 --> 0:06:24.960
<v Speaker 1>it's actually much harder to get that than it was,

0:06:25.240 --> 0:06:27.839
<v Speaker 1>say twenty or thirty years ago. We've gone backwards there.

0:06:28.040 --> 0:06:32.240
<v Speaker 1>And then on the equity side, I think stripeatless has

0:06:32.279 --> 0:06:37.240
<v Speaker 1>actually helped make more companies investable because what a lot

0:06:37.240 --> 0:06:40.080
<v Speaker 1>of people don't realize is stripeatlists are in corporation product.

0:06:40.279 --> 0:06:44.440
<v Speaker 1>But it lets companies where the founders might be in

0:06:44.480 --> 0:06:47.039
<v Speaker 1>Israel or might be you know, in Singapore or something

0:06:47.080 --> 0:06:50.720
<v Speaker 1>like that, create a US Delaware company and that makes

0:06:50.760 --> 0:06:52.560
<v Speaker 1>it much more investable. And so we've seen a lot

0:06:52.600 --> 0:06:56.359
<v Speaker 1>of foreign founders kind of virtually creating a US company,

0:06:56.480 --> 0:07:00.119
<v Speaker 1>which it just turns out foreign companies investors fanan too scary.

0:07:00.160 --> 0:07:02.000
<v Speaker 3>So I guess I'm responsible for the framing that you're

0:07:02.040 --> 0:07:04.160
<v Speaker 3>sort of in somebody's a substitute for an investment back.

0:07:04.200 --> 0:07:06.080
<v Speaker 3>So like your framing is like increase the GDP of

0:07:06.080 --> 0:07:08.240
<v Speaker 3>the Internet. But like you know, you have these businesses

0:07:08.279 --> 0:07:12.880
<v Speaker 3>like incorporating companies, like what is the principle? And like

0:07:13.360 --> 0:07:15.040
<v Speaker 3>that was like a real investment banker I was doing,

0:07:15.080 --> 0:07:18.720
<v Speaker 3>like corporate derivatives. I'm like, I assume you would never

0:07:18.880 --> 0:07:20.560
<v Speaker 3>get into that business, But am I wrong?

0:07:21.160 --> 0:07:23.600
<v Speaker 1>We're certainly not planning on us. We build products that

0:07:23.680 --> 0:07:26.600
<v Speaker 1>are scalable in some way through tech and so you know,

0:07:26.800 --> 0:07:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Stripe itself. This past year we did trillion dollars in

0:07:30.120 --> 0:07:32.160
<v Speaker 1>payment through the strip platform. That's still growing in a

0:07:32.160 --> 0:07:34.559
<v Speaker 1>pretty healthy clip. The number of businesses served is millions

0:07:34.600 --> 0:07:37.160
<v Speaker 1>of dollars. And so if there's something that is solved

0:07:37.160 --> 0:07:39.280
<v Speaker 1>by just throwing an army of people at it, I mean,

0:07:39.520 --> 0:07:41.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, all the investment banking firms are exceptional ash

0:07:41.560 --> 0:07:44.760
<v Speaker 1>recruiting armies of people, and that is a very competitive space,

0:07:44.800 --> 0:07:46.480
<v Speaker 1>whereas the space of you know, like I was saying,

0:07:46.480 --> 0:07:48.160
<v Speaker 1>with the lending side of things, that was just an

0:07:48.240 --> 0:07:50.600
<v Speaker 1>underserved marketers where we came at it by talking to

0:07:50.640 --> 0:07:52.680
<v Speaker 1>our customers and they said, we really need growth capital

0:07:52.760 --> 0:07:55.200
<v Speaker 1>as actually very annoying for us to get us and

0:07:55.280 --> 0:07:58.880
<v Speaker 1>so I guess we try to find the underserved spaces,

0:07:58.960 --> 0:08:02.880
<v Speaker 1>and investment banking, for you know, certainly on the larger side,

0:08:02.880 --> 0:08:04.400
<v Speaker 1>does not seem underserved right now.

0:08:04.600 --> 0:08:06.880
<v Speaker 2>I've listened to a lot of podcasts you've been on

0:08:06.920 --> 0:08:09.840
<v Speaker 2>in the past several weeks, so sorry, no, no, it's

0:08:09.840 --> 0:08:13.160
<v Speaker 2>been really interesting. You interviewed Charlie Munger, which was I.

0:08:13.200 --> 0:08:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Much prefer interviewing to being interviewed. So we'll come back

0:08:16.240 --> 0:08:17.640
<v Speaker 1>for the second round of this where you guys are

0:08:17.640 --> 0:08:18.160
<v Speaker 1>put on the spot.

0:08:18.240 --> 0:08:19.560
<v Speaker 2>That'll be a lot of fun. We'll put that on

0:08:19.560 --> 0:08:22.920
<v Speaker 2>the calendar. But at one point Charlie Munger started talking

0:08:22.960 --> 0:08:26.280
<v Speaker 2>about like banks and they're selling these sleazy products, and

0:08:26.320 --> 0:08:28.119
<v Speaker 2>of course I couldn't see if you were nodding along

0:08:28.240 --> 0:08:30.120
<v Speaker 2>and I were talking about, you know, whether you would chafe.

0:08:30.160 --> 0:08:33.320
<v Speaker 2>It's sort of the comparison to you know, an investment bank,

0:08:33.400 --> 0:08:35.680
<v Speaker 2>for example, but it sounds like you don't, No, I don't.

0:08:35.880 --> 0:08:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Investment banking provides a useful set of services in the

0:08:38.280 --> 0:08:40.679
<v Speaker 1>world and Okay, one things I really like about the

0:08:40.720 --> 0:08:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Money Stuff newsletter is a studied detachment from what's going

0:08:46.440 --> 0:08:48.920
<v Speaker 1>on where there are people and people respond to incentives

0:08:48.960 --> 0:08:51.000
<v Speaker 1>and that creates behaviors in the world. I like Matt

0:08:51.040 --> 0:08:53.640
<v Speaker 1>does have views and you know, just like crypto and

0:08:53.840 --> 0:08:55.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, all sorts of things, and you can kind

0:08:55.880 --> 0:08:58.040
<v Speaker 1>of the views that occasionally come out, but it's mostly

0:08:58.080 --> 0:09:00.600
<v Speaker 1>this very detached view of what's going on in the world.

0:09:00.920 --> 0:09:03.520
<v Speaker 1>But the way we think about it, like, for example,

0:09:03.559 --> 0:09:06.320
<v Speaker 1>we think, you know, stripes, scale and revenue are actually

0:09:06.360 --> 0:09:09.600
<v Speaker 1>pretty decent proxies for the value stripe is providing in

0:09:09.600 --> 0:09:11.400
<v Speaker 1>the world. That's not always the case with the business.

0:09:11.440 --> 0:09:13.720
<v Speaker 1>You could have an extract of business somewhere, or monopolies

0:09:13.800 --> 0:09:16.439
<v Speaker 1>or rent extraction or something like that. But in our

0:09:16.480 --> 0:09:21.200
<v Speaker 1>case we have very INFORGMNED buyers and a very competitive market.

0:09:21.240 --> 0:09:23.040
<v Speaker 1>There are lots of other places people could go for

0:09:23.120 --> 0:09:26.160
<v Speaker 1>payment acceptance or billing software or something like that, and

0:09:26.240 --> 0:09:28.559
<v Speaker 1>so generally, if customers are choosing you and paying you

0:09:28.600 --> 0:09:30.839
<v Speaker 1>money for a service, it's because you're providing something of

0:09:30.920 --> 0:09:33.560
<v Speaker 1>value that you can't get elsewhere. And similar with investment banks,

0:09:33.600 --> 0:09:35.400
<v Speaker 1>I think if people are going to investment banks for

0:09:35.440 --> 0:09:37.960
<v Speaker 1>a thing, that's probably because they're providing some value to them.

0:09:38.000 --> 0:09:39.319
<v Speaker 1>And so that's the frame of guy I tend to take.

0:09:39.520 --> 0:09:43.360
<v Speaker 1>I think Charlie rest in Peace generally took a lot

0:09:43.360 --> 0:09:48.319
<v Speaker 1>of offense as where he saw people hyping things, principal

0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:51.160
<v Speaker 1>agent problems. You know, there's a set of things that

0:09:51.200 --> 0:09:55.440
<v Speaker 1>bothered him, Crypto Robinhood, mutual fund advisors, and you know,

0:09:55.600 --> 0:09:58.160
<v Speaker 1>you could understand I could construct the Steelman for those cases.

0:09:58.320 --> 0:10:02.040
<v Speaker 3>I think there's a lot of opacity and pricing and

0:10:02.160 --> 0:10:06.000
<v Speaker 3>value in financial services that there's probably a lot less

0:10:06.000 --> 0:10:08.080
<v Speaker 3>of in your business, right, Like you're kind of charging

0:10:08.080 --> 0:10:09.240
<v Speaker 3>a transparent feed to people.

0:10:09.320 --> 0:10:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and certain the more scaled something is, the more

0:10:11.160 --> 0:10:14.040
<v Speaker 1>price comparison they'll be, the more efficient the pricing will be. Whereas, yeah,

0:10:14.080 --> 0:10:17.320
<v Speaker 1>there's more room for extracting price in the when you

0:10:17.360 --> 0:10:18.520
<v Speaker 1>get into bespoke deals.

0:10:19.160 --> 0:10:21.720
<v Speaker 3>So one thing I think of when I give investment

0:10:21.760 --> 0:10:24.480
<v Speaker 3>banking is just serving as an advisor to CEOs and

0:10:24.520 --> 0:10:26.679
<v Speaker 3>sort of giving them general advice on their business. And

0:10:26.720 --> 0:10:28.880
<v Speaker 3>we were talking before about you know, you are now

0:10:28.960 --> 0:10:32.120
<v Speaker 3>interacting with a lot of big companies, and you had

0:10:32.120 --> 0:10:35.760
<v Speaker 3>some views on like the ability of a big company

0:10:35.840 --> 0:10:38.800
<v Speaker 3>to CEO to sort of understand her company, and I'm

0:10:39.400 --> 0:10:41.120
<v Speaker 3>I'd love for you to talk about them.

0:10:41.320 --> 0:10:46.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think people think that CEOs are able to

0:10:47.280 --> 0:10:50.199
<v Speaker 1>drive change in their organizations. I'm talking about organizations in general.

0:10:50.200 --> 0:10:52.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm not talking about the Stripe. People think that a CEO

0:10:52.360 --> 0:10:54.360
<v Speaker 1>lands in a new job, they take over a company,

0:10:54.720 --> 0:10:57.480
<v Speaker 1>and they're able to just whip everything into shape and

0:10:57.640 --> 0:11:02.000
<v Speaker 1>change everything. And I think the general experience of CEOs

0:11:02.040 --> 0:11:04.120
<v Speaker 1>and in new jobs is that is not the case.

0:11:04.160 --> 0:11:06.839
<v Speaker 1>And organizations are pretty hard to change. And in fact,

0:11:06.960 --> 0:11:10.000
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that we believe strongly at STRIPE

0:11:10.360 --> 0:11:14.120
<v Speaker 1>is it's very important for people to get close to

0:11:14.160 --> 0:11:17.640
<v Speaker 1>the work or you will not be able to drive

0:11:18.480 --> 0:11:21.200
<v Speaker 1>any meaningful, useful change. And so like a bunch of

0:11:21.200 --> 0:11:23.480
<v Speaker 1>different ways in which we do that. It actually reminds

0:11:23.520 --> 0:11:26.440
<v Speaker 1>me of the lean manufacturing principle, you know. And they

0:11:26.600 --> 0:11:29.000
<v Speaker 1>have all these very nice esthetic Japanese terms for things,

0:11:29.040 --> 0:11:30.640
<v Speaker 1>and so you know, there's the English equivalent per much

0:11:30.640 --> 0:11:32.920
<v Speaker 1>for the Japanese terms, but in them is gemba, which

0:11:32.960 --> 0:11:35.160
<v Speaker 1>is this idea that managers should you know, walk the

0:11:35.160 --> 0:11:37.520
<v Speaker 1>factory floor and solicit ideas from the people who are

0:11:37.559 --> 0:11:40.600
<v Speaker 1>on the production line and things like that, and all companies,

0:11:40.640 --> 0:11:43.280
<v Speaker 1>like a tech company like Stripe has its equivalents. And

0:11:43.360 --> 0:11:50.000
<v Speaker 1>so we very much encourage engineering managers to actually write

0:11:50.040 --> 0:11:51.920
<v Speaker 1>code at Stripe to get the experience of what is

0:11:51.920 --> 0:11:53.960
<v Speaker 1>it like working in their corner of the code baselat

0:11:54.080 --> 0:11:57.040
<v Speaker 1>problems our engineers running into. I really enjoyed being a

0:11:57.120 --> 0:12:00.040
<v Speaker 1>CFO last year when we were between CFOs, and the

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:02.400
<v Speaker 1>reasons I really enjoyed that again was getting closer to

0:12:03.400 --> 0:12:06.840
<v Speaker 1>the actual numbers, the processes by which we drive the business,

0:12:06.880 --> 0:12:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Like we're going to hold Stripe to a budget regardless,

0:12:09.640 --> 0:12:11.720
<v Speaker 1>and aren't you interested in how that process is actually

0:12:11.720 --> 0:12:13.480
<v Speaker 1>set and how those numbers are set and everything like that.

0:12:13.520 --> 0:12:15.840
<v Speaker 1>So you know, I say that I think every founder

0:12:15.840 --> 0:12:18.560
<v Speaker 1>should be CFO of their business for at some point

0:12:18.720 --> 0:12:21.439
<v Speaker 1>during its lifespan. It's it's a very educational experience.

0:12:21.880 --> 0:12:24.400
<v Speaker 3>Did like product ideas? Did you do that and come

0:12:24.440 --> 0:12:28.319
<v Speaker 3>away with like we need to do accounting software? No? No?

0:12:28.840 --> 0:12:29.160
<v Speaker 4>Or or?

0:12:29.200 --> 0:12:31.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean I mean maybe in an abstract way, but again,

0:12:31.800 --> 0:12:34.199
<v Speaker 1>Stripes finance needs are are maybe a little different from

0:12:34.200 --> 0:12:37.160
<v Speaker 1>the broader ones. But again, I just think for getting

0:12:37.200 --> 0:12:40.840
<v Speaker 1>close to how the business actually runs that's maybe the

0:12:40.840 --> 0:12:44.960
<v Speaker 1>thing that's hard for CEOs to do, and you know,

0:12:45.120 --> 0:12:47.040
<v Speaker 1>we tried to do it from a customer perspective a

0:12:47.120 --> 0:12:49.120
<v Speaker 1>huge amount of Even some of the products we're talking about,

0:12:49.160 --> 0:12:52.200
<v Speaker 1>like Stripe Capital, they basically come from us trying to

0:12:52.240 --> 0:12:55.600
<v Speaker 1>spend more time with our customers than our competitors do.

0:12:55.840 --> 0:12:58.240
<v Speaker 1>And so you know, we'll start every leadership team meeting

0:12:58.720 --> 0:13:01.679
<v Speaker 1>at am Monday morning with hearing from a customer. We

0:13:01.679 --> 0:13:02.839
<v Speaker 1>just asked them to come and give us kind of

0:13:02.880 --> 0:13:05.120
<v Speaker 1>feedback on the product. If you were to sit in

0:13:05.160 --> 0:13:08.160
<v Speaker 1>on those meetings, it's not an A plus report card

0:13:08.200 --> 0:13:10.199
<v Speaker 1>that we're getting. You know, there are things they want

0:13:10.240 --> 0:13:13.360
<v Speaker 1>us to fix. But I find that it's easy for

0:13:13.480 --> 0:13:15.760
<v Speaker 1>like product managers to overcomplicate things, and you know, you

0:13:15.760 --> 0:13:18.079
<v Speaker 1>can get in your own heads and construct some really

0:13:18.160 --> 0:13:20.760
<v Speaker 1>convolutioned castle in the sky, and there's nothing quite as

0:13:20.760 --> 0:13:23.719
<v Speaker 1>grounding as hearing directly from a customer talk about what

0:13:24.000 --> 0:13:25.440
<v Speaker 1>is not working for them in the product. And you know,

0:13:25.440 --> 0:13:27.199
<v Speaker 1>we do the same on Fridays with like an all

0:13:27.240 --> 0:13:30.040
<v Speaker 1>company thing, bring customers to talk to that. But anyway,

0:13:30.320 --> 0:13:32.400
<v Speaker 1>I think the essence of this for CEOs is getting

0:13:32.400 --> 0:13:35.480
<v Speaker 1>close to the actual production function. And that is sometimes

0:13:35.480 --> 0:13:35.920
<v Speaker 1>hard for them.

0:13:36.160 --> 0:13:38.840
<v Speaker 2>So I have two points. It's interesting to hear you

0:13:38.880 --> 0:13:40.800
<v Speaker 2>say that. First of all, my brain immediately goes to

0:13:40.840 --> 0:13:44.560
<v Speaker 2>Elon Musk, like on the factory floor at SpaceX and Tesla.

0:13:44.640 --> 0:13:46.840
<v Speaker 2>But it was interesting. We had Home Depot this week

0:13:46.960 --> 0:13:50.160
<v Speaker 2>announced that they were going to require corporate employees to

0:13:50.200 --> 0:13:54.199
<v Speaker 2>work eight hour factory shifts, which is interesting, like retail shifts.

0:13:54.360 --> 0:13:55.920
<v Speaker 1>So Starbucks did something similar.

0:13:55.679 --> 0:13:57.680
<v Speaker 2>Right, Yeah, which makes a lot of sense, I mean,

0:13:58.120 --> 0:14:01.360
<v Speaker 2>especially in brutal jobs. Is that one and then the

0:14:01.440 --> 0:14:04.000
<v Speaker 2>other thing? I mean, given that you do know so

0:14:04.120 --> 0:14:06.800
<v Speaker 2>much about his business history and you know, just love

0:14:06.920 --> 0:14:09.280
<v Speaker 2>looking at companies, but those eight am meetings where you're

0:14:09.320 --> 0:14:12.040
<v Speaker 2>just talking to your different companies, like, you see so

0:14:12.200 --> 0:14:15.240
<v Speaker 2>many different types of companies, which is interesting.

0:14:15.760 --> 0:14:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And it's definitely a pretty interesting time. I think

0:14:17.880 --> 0:14:21.280
<v Speaker 1>the behavior we observe is that tech has been very

0:14:21.280 --> 0:14:23.720
<v Speaker 1>well covered, and so I think everyone knows broadly kind

0:14:23.720 --> 0:14:25.640
<v Speaker 1>of what's going on in the tech world. What we

0:14:25.680 --> 0:14:29.760
<v Speaker 1>find interesting is the businesses that are the Sherwin Williams

0:14:29.760 --> 0:14:31.480
<v Speaker 1>of the world, you know, the businesses that are ten,

0:14:31.520 --> 0:14:33.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty fifty, one hundred and two hundred years old, and

0:14:33.920 --> 0:14:36.080
<v Speaker 1>how they are adapting to the modern world. And generally,

0:14:36.160 --> 0:14:41.840
<v Speaker 1>what we find is that COVID provided a useful long

0:14:41.920 --> 0:14:44.760
<v Speaker 1>term change to those businesses because those kinds of businesses

0:14:44.840 --> 0:14:49.400
<v Speaker 1>all employed a chief Digital Innovation officer prior to Covid,

0:14:49.440 --> 0:14:51.080
<v Speaker 1>and that person had a team to ten people, and

0:14:51.120 --> 0:14:52.800
<v Speaker 1>they produced all these slides and ideas, and the ideas

0:14:52.800 --> 0:14:54.720
<v Speaker 1>were pretty good, and the company just ignored all them

0:14:54.760 --> 0:14:56.520
<v Speaker 1>and just didn't do any of them. And so they

0:14:56.520 --> 0:14:58.520
<v Speaker 1>had the kind of idea generation part and nothing happened.

0:14:58.880 --> 0:15:02.880
<v Speaker 1>And then it happened, and it was this oh moment

0:15:03.360 --> 0:15:06.520
<v Speaker 1>where people they were forced to adapt because you know,

0:15:06.520 --> 0:15:08.560
<v Speaker 1>obviously the stories were locked down or we're not open,

0:15:08.760 --> 0:15:11.640
<v Speaker 1>and so you maybe had gym companies moving to virtual

0:15:11.640 --> 0:15:15.040
<v Speaker 1>training or something like that. But that created a mandate

0:15:15.040 --> 0:15:17.600
<v Speaker 1>for actually getting serious about the digital stuff. And we

0:15:17.680 --> 0:15:22.000
<v Speaker 1>see much higher quality digital execution coming out of that.

0:15:22.280 --> 0:15:24.680
<v Speaker 1>And there's kind of a few common patterns in what

0:15:24.720 --> 0:15:30.160
<v Speaker 1>everyone's trying to do. I think everyone is questioning their middlemen.

0:15:30.200 --> 0:15:32.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't think middlemen are going away, but they're questioning

0:15:32.320 --> 0:15:35.600
<v Speaker 1>the middlemen and do middlemen add value? And they are

0:15:35.640 --> 0:15:39.640
<v Speaker 1>starting to do much more direct customer relationship stuff. Part

0:15:39.680 --> 0:15:42.400
<v Speaker 1>of that is the product experience where you know, Hershey's

0:15:42.440 --> 0:15:46.320
<v Speaker 1>using Stripe to sell candy directly online, and the customization

0:15:46.400 --> 0:15:50.040
<v Speaker 1>and things like that, and then everyone's just trying to

0:15:50.240 --> 0:15:52.680
<v Speaker 1>build some kind of recurring revenue. And so, you know,

0:15:52.720 --> 0:15:54.320
<v Speaker 1>we think there's two kinds of business in the world.

0:15:54.400 --> 0:15:56.240
<v Speaker 1>There's those who have recurring revenue and those who want

0:15:56.280 --> 0:15:59.160
<v Speaker 1>recurring revenue. And people talk about the engine, you know,

0:15:59.200 --> 0:16:01.320
<v Speaker 1>the airplane engineers with power by the hour. You know,

0:16:01.320 --> 0:16:03.680
<v Speaker 1>you actually don't buy an engine, you buy you know,

0:16:04.080 --> 0:16:07.720
<v Speaker 1>specially exactly. You might trust, you know, the by the minute.

0:16:07.840 --> 0:16:10.320
<v Speaker 1>But that is actually was all companies are moving towards

0:16:10.360 --> 0:16:12.160
<v Speaker 1>because it's kind of better on both sides of the equation.

0:16:12.400 --> 0:16:14.760
<v Speaker 1>And obviously that's pretty complex from an implementation point of view.

0:16:14.760 --> 0:16:27.640
<v Speaker 4>And so the intercomanent Stripe.

0:16:30.320 --> 0:16:32.840
<v Speaker 3>I did like the Stripe fire side a while back,

0:16:32.880 --> 0:16:35.120
<v Speaker 3>and You're like, what should we do? And I was like,

0:16:35.240 --> 0:16:36.880
<v Speaker 3>you should fix paywalls. Have you done it?

0:16:37.880 --> 0:16:41.320
<v Speaker 1>We're getting there because one of us hard. Why is

0:16:41.360 --> 0:16:43.880
<v Speaker 1>it hard? Okay, it's hard for a few reasons. One,

0:16:44.880 --> 0:16:49.000
<v Speaker 1>I think people confuse paywalls with micropayments, and I think

0:16:49.120 --> 0:16:54.560
<v Speaker 1>more consumers want micropayments than publishers. For the publishers want macropayments.

0:16:54.640 --> 0:16:56.640
<v Speaker 3>I think nobody wants micropayments and ever wants to talk

0:16:56.680 --> 0:16:57.760
<v Speaker 3>about it wrong.

0:16:57.800 --> 0:16:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Okay, yeah, yeah. So anyway, once we move past the

0:16:59.520 --> 0:17:06.440
<v Speaker 1>micropayments thing, then it's hard because you ultimately need to

0:17:06.480 --> 0:17:10.160
<v Speaker 1>smooth the onboarding friction and you probably need some cross

0:17:10.240 --> 0:17:13.240
<v Speaker 1>publisher network and you know, publishers are not competing, they're

0:17:13.240 --> 0:17:16.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe not inclined to work together, and then it's just

0:17:16.640 --> 0:17:18.359
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of tech upgrades which are actually kind of

0:17:19.040 --> 0:17:21.479
<v Speaker 1>somewhat prosaic long running projects, but you know, you need

0:17:21.480 --> 0:17:22.720
<v Speaker 1>to be able to have the patients to work with

0:17:22.760 --> 0:17:24.760
<v Speaker 1>the media company to spend a year or year and

0:17:24.800 --> 0:17:26.920
<v Speaker 1>a half upgrade in their stack. The way we've ended

0:17:27.000 --> 0:17:29.159
<v Speaker 1>up doing this is with our product link, which is

0:17:29.240 --> 0:17:31.119
<v Speaker 1>very simple but is really starting to work. It just

0:17:31.160 --> 0:17:33.240
<v Speaker 1>remember you guys, maybe run into it on the internet.

0:17:33.320 --> 0:17:36.360
<v Speaker 1>It just remembers your credentials across websites, and so if

0:17:36.359 --> 0:17:38.879
<v Speaker 1>you've bought on websites A with stripe and you have

0:17:38.960 --> 0:17:41.600
<v Speaker 1>the box checked to remember your payment details, then you'll

0:17:41.640 --> 0:17:44.160
<v Speaker 1>be able to buy on site B without entering your

0:17:44.200 --> 0:17:47.240
<v Speaker 1>payment details again and you might think it will lead

0:17:47.240 --> 0:17:49.280
<v Speaker 1>to a big increase in conversion if a lot of

0:17:49.520 --> 0:17:51.800
<v Speaker 1>consumers have their payment credentials remembered so they don't have

0:17:51.840 --> 0:17:53.800
<v Speaker 1>to type any extra data in they can just click buy.

0:17:54.000 --> 0:17:56.440
<v Speaker 1>And turns out it does. And there's obviously a virtuous

0:17:56.440 --> 0:17:59.080
<v Speaker 1>cycle here where you know, the more people sign up

0:17:59.080 --> 0:18:01.160
<v Speaker 1>for it, but denser the network gets. So that's where

0:18:01.160 --> 0:18:02.720
<v Speaker 1>it's starting to work. And so we have some media

0:18:02.720 --> 0:18:04.760
<v Speaker 1>properties starting to use that. And so what it means

0:18:04.840 --> 0:18:07.159
<v Speaker 1>is they get lots of people coming with credentials all

0:18:07.200 --> 0:18:09.040
<v Speaker 1>pre filled and they just need to hit by and

0:18:09.160 --> 0:18:10.880
<v Speaker 1>then the commercial proposition just needs to work.

0:18:11.000 --> 0:18:13.080
<v Speaker 3>I just feel like the media payoll problem for me

0:18:13.200 --> 0:18:15.640
<v Speaker 3>is not even the payment credentials. It's once you've paid

0:18:15.720 --> 0:18:19.119
<v Speaker 3>for a payoll, keeping you logged in, you're on your

0:18:19.119 --> 0:18:24.280
<v Speaker 3>phone to computers, you're like, you get something emailed to you.

0:18:24.320 --> 0:18:26.399
<v Speaker 2>And just remember me. It's really frustrating.

0:18:26.600 --> 0:18:28.639
<v Speaker 1>We should and may get to that as well. I agree,

0:18:28.680 --> 0:18:30.000
<v Speaker 1>that's that's part two of it. To me.

0:18:30.040 --> 0:18:31.960
<v Speaker 3>That's related to like online identity and the stuff that

0:18:31.960 --> 0:18:35.320
<v Speaker 3>people are crypto people away talking about. So I also

0:18:35.320 --> 0:18:37.520
<v Speaker 3>have listened to you on podcasts. One thing that you've said,

0:18:37.640 --> 0:18:41.600
<v Speaker 3>is that when you started raising money for a shripe,

0:18:41.760 --> 0:18:44.679
<v Speaker 3>people are like, why isn't this assault problem pay exists?

0:18:44.960 --> 0:18:47.720
<v Speaker 3>Can you tell us why it's not right it wasn't

0:18:47.800 --> 0:18:49.840
<v Speaker 3>or why is it isn't? Like why is payments hard?

0:18:50.080 --> 0:18:53.120
<v Speaker 3>And like there were payments companies before you, like, what's

0:18:53.280 --> 0:18:54.159
<v Speaker 3>the thing that you're solving?

0:18:54.200 --> 0:18:54.600
<v Speaker 4>They didn't.

0:18:55.320 --> 0:18:59.159
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't solved for a few reasons. Payments requires you

0:18:59.200 --> 0:19:02.199
<v Speaker 1>to be good at two very different things that are

0:19:02.280 --> 0:19:07.480
<v Speaker 1>quite distinct skill sets. There's technology and there's financial services.

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:11.640
<v Speaker 1>And so prior to Stripe, you had some payment companies

0:19:11.680 --> 0:19:13.600
<v Speaker 1>that just did the technology layer. You know, they said,

0:19:13.600 --> 0:19:15.399
<v Speaker 1>we're a nice API and we plug into you know,

0:19:15.440 --> 0:19:17.400
<v Speaker 1>whatever bank you use. But that wasn't a good payment

0:19:17.400 --> 0:19:19.359
<v Speaker 1>experience because you then try to sign up with the

0:19:19.400 --> 0:19:22.440
<v Speaker 1>bank and you know, it's spent week shuffling paperwork around

0:19:22.480 --> 0:19:25.720
<v Speaker 1>or something like that. And so a huge amount of

0:19:25.720 --> 0:19:28.919
<v Speaker 1>what we do is at the intersection of those things,

0:19:28.960 --> 0:19:33.080
<v Speaker 1>where you have AMLKYC considerations, where you know, a stripe

0:19:33.119 --> 0:19:37.400
<v Speaker 1>is essentially aiming to look at the activity going on

0:19:37.400 --> 0:19:39.880
<v Speaker 1>on its platform and ensure that it is lisit and

0:19:40.080 --> 0:19:42.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, acceptable activity that's happening on the platform, and

0:19:42.880 --> 0:19:45.280
<v Speaker 1>so we do lots of cool mL work. You know,

0:19:45.320 --> 0:19:48.520
<v Speaker 1>we don't talk about it really that much publicly because

0:19:48.640 --> 0:19:51.080
<v Speaker 1>it is just what goes into operating a skilled platform

0:19:51.200 --> 0:19:53.600
<v Speaker 1>like this, but it's a huge amount of the special

0:19:53.640 --> 0:19:57.080
<v Speaker 1>sauce that makes Stripe tick. At the same time, the

0:19:57.119 --> 0:19:58.959
<v Speaker 1>tech has to be really good and nice and usable,

0:19:59.040 --> 0:20:01.920
<v Speaker 1>and customers really care about latency, they really care about

0:20:01.960 --> 0:20:04.880
<v Speaker 1>how easy the API integration experiences, and so I would

0:20:04.880 --> 0:20:08.880
<v Speaker 1>say companies prior to Stripe tended to pick a lane

0:20:08.880 --> 0:20:11.080
<v Speaker 1>a bit where you had a few purely tech companies

0:20:11.119 --> 0:20:13.199
<v Speaker 1>where you know, they'd say, we're a payment s gateway

0:20:13.200 --> 0:20:14.920
<v Speaker 1>and we just don't think about anything. We just handle

0:20:14.920 --> 0:20:18.120
<v Speaker 1>off the transaction of something someone else or those banks,

0:20:18.560 --> 0:20:21.280
<v Speaker 1>and they actually just generally outsourced the tech. They didn't

0:20:21.280 --> 0:20:23.639
<v Speaker 1>even really do it themselves, or if they did themselves,

0:20:23.680 --> 0:20:26.080
<v Speaker 1>they did not do it particularly well, and so it

0:20:26.200 --> 0:20:29.720
<v Speaker 1>was a very crummy experience for the developers actually using it.

0:20:29.760 --> 0:20:32.240
<v Speaker 1>And of course, the tech changes Mobile was just coming

0:20:32.240 --> 0:20:34.439
<v Speaker 1>along as we were getting started. You know, the iPhone

0:20:34.440 --> 0:20:35.919
<v Speaker 1>App Store came out in two thousand and eight. We

0:20:35.920 --> 0:20:37.760
<v Speaker 1>started Stripe in two thousand and nine, so like we

0:20:37.760 --> 0:20:39.760
<v Speaker 1>were just in time for that, and so mobile was

0:20:39.760 --> 0:20:42.840
<v Speaker 1>a very relevant consideration. You know, even just the web

0:20:42.880 --> 0:20:45.879
<v Speaker 1>apps and SaaS and everything grew a huge amount, and

0:20:45.920 --> 0:20:48.320
<v Speaker 1>so I think the banks had not built for that

0:20:48.520 --> 0:20:50.679
<v Speaker 1>and did not build for that, and so there was

0:20:50.680 --> 0:20:53.399
<v Speaker 1>maybe a gap between the existing providers and there was

0:20:53.440 --> 0:20:54.800
<v Speaker 1>that sort of things that you had to be really

0:20:54.800 --> 0:20:56.800
<v Speaker 1>good at. There were huge number of things with Stripe

0:20:56.840 --> 0:20:59.320
<v Speaker 1>that we did buy intuitive feel they were not part

0:20:59.359 --> 0:21:02.760
<v Speaker 1>of a particularly deliberate tops down strategy that was written

0:21:02.760 --> 0:21:05.160
<v Speaker 1>down in the business plan, but ended up working out well.

0:21:05.480 --> 0:21:08.400
<v Speaker 1>And so one was our really early focus on developers,

0:21:08.440 --> 0:21:10.840
<v Speaker 1>where our go to market was through developers. We started

0:21:10.840 --> 0:21:12.960
<v Speaker 1>by selling to startups and there was this really i

0:21:13.000 --> 0:21:15.680
<v Speaker 1>would say, kind of bottoms up sort of adoption motion.

0:21:16.119 --> 0:21:19.160
<v Speaker 1>But again, ultimately the product we're selling is a technical

0:21:19.240 --> 0:21:21.360
<v Speaker 1>API product, and so of course you should be thinking

0:21:21.359 --> 0:21:23.840
<v Speaker 1>about what the developers want. We just had the developer

0:21:23.880 --> 0:21:26.320
<v Speaker 1>focus because we were software engineers ourselves. We just wanted

0:21:26.320 --> 0:21:28.840
<v Speaker 1>to build a product that we thought was a good product.

0:21:29.080 --> 0:21:30.760
<v Speaker 1>But I think it ended up being more strategic than

0:21:30.800 --> 0:21:32.040
<v Speaker 1>we maybe realized in the beginning.

0:21:32.560 --> 0:21:36.600
<v Speaker 3>There's a lot of like mess in the legal and

0:21:36.720 --> 0:21:40.440
<v Speaker 3>like infrastructure of the payment system, and like your job

0:21:40.520 --> 0:21:43.160
<v Speaker 3>is to provide people a very clean abstraction to that mess,

0:21:43.160 --> 0:21:45.280
<v Speaker 3>and like that means handling all of the mess and

0:21:45.320 --> 0:21:47.200
<v Speaker 3>you know, actually going on figuring stuff out and then

0:21:47.240 --> 0:21:48.840
<v Speaker 3>being able to put that in the back end of

0:21:48.880 --> 0:21:51.960
<v Speaker 3>your API. So the API is like a very clean abstraction.

0:21:52.160 --> 0:21:55.679
<v Speaker 1>Like is that burn Hobart had a line that I

0:21:55.840 --> 0:21:58.359
<v Speaker 1>liked in one of his newsletters that stripe makes the

0:21:58.400 --> 0:22:00.840
<v Speaker 1>financial system work the way people think it already does.

0:22:01.119 --> 0:22:03.520
<v Speaker 1>And that's I think is actually a pretty nice design

0:22:03.600 --> 0:22:05.919
<v Speaker 1>principle for us. And you know, maybe a good example

0:22:05.960 --> 0:22:06.640
<v Speaker 1>of this is.

0:22:06.720 --> 0:22:08.840
<v Speaker 3>See when I hear that I want you to do

0:22:08.920 --> 0:22:11.800
<v Speaker 3>like equity derivatives, I want you to do more of

0:22:11.840 --> 0:22:12.600
<v Speaker 3>this stuff in my world.

0:22:12.760 --> 0:22:15.560
<v Speaker 1>But I don't think we have a view on how improved.

0:22:15.560 --> 0:22:17.160
<v Speaker 1>No one has, sad maybe we just think about it more.

0:22:17.320 --> 0:22:19.920
<v Speaker 2>I do want to talk about crypto. Yeah, we debated

0:22:19.960 --> 0:22:23.080
<v Speaker 2>this internally, but when it comes to the payments world,

0:22:23.520 --> 0:22:27.280
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the conversation tends to devolve into a crypto

0:22:27.359 --> 0:22:30.919
<v Speaker 2>conversation because I feel like crypto is trying to solve

0:22:31.520 --> 0:22:33.879
<v Speaker 2>a lot of payments problems, especially when it comes to

0:22:34.000 --> 0:22:37.440
<v Speaker 2>cross border payments and I'm not asking you about like

0:22:37.480 --> 0:22:39.720
<v Speaker 2>the price of bitcoin or whether you're bullish on you know,

0:22:39.800 --> 0:22:42.679
<v Speaker 2>number go up. But when it comes to crypto and

0:22:42.720 --> 0:22:44.760
<v Speaker 2>the problems that it's trying to solve, I mean, how

0:22:44.800 --> 0:22:45.560
<v Speaker 2>do you think about it?

0:22:45.920 --> 0:22:48.639
<v Speaker 1>We're quite excited about crypto at the moment. I interpret

0:22:48.680 --> 0:22:53.280
<v Speaker 1>money stuff as the house position as moderately cryptoskeptical, and

0:22:54.160 --> 0:22:56.320
<v Speaker 1>so I guess what I would say to a moderately

0:22:56.359 --> 0:23:00.600
<v Speaker 1>cryptoskeptical audience, They'd be two things. One, there are just

0:23:00.600 --> 0:23:03.960
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of scams and dodgy characters and everything like that.

0:23:04.119 --> 0:23:05.720
<v Speaker 1>But it kind of reminds me of I at the

0:23:05.720 --> 0:23:07.119
<v Speaker 1>first I grew up in Ireland. The first time I

0:23:07.160 --> 0:23:10.119
<v Speaker 1>went to Vegas was for work conference there. It was

0:23:10.359 --> 0:23:12.600
<v Speaker 1>for a work conference, and you know, at the Venetian

0:23:12.680 --> 0:23:16.120
<v Speaker 1>or something like that, probably Money twenty twenty, and you're

0:23:16.160 --> 0:23:19.560
<v Speaker 1>going into the hotel past like all the people smoking

0:23:19.560 --> 0:23:22.240
<v Speaker 1>indoors and like the people just addicted to the slot machines,

0:23:22.280 --> 0:23:23.760
<v Speaker 1>just pressing them again and again again, and it's all

0:23:23.800 --> 0:23:25.520
<v Speaker 1>the blinking lights and you know the I guess, the

0:23:25.520 --> 0:23:27.320
<v Speaker 1>clatter of the coins paying out, and you have to

0:23:27.359 --> 0:23:31.840
<v Speaker 1>walk past this degenerate gambling area crazy scene. Yeah, it's

0:23:31.840 --> 0:23:35.240
<v Speaker 1>a grim scene to get to your serious industry conference,

0:23:35.280 --> 0:23:37.920
<v Speaker 1>and those very surprising to me. And I don't know,

0:23:37.960 --> 0:23:40.640
<v Speaker 1>there's something similar in crypto where you have the casino

0:23:41.000 --> 0:23:44.000
<v Speaker 1>dogecoin value speculating part of it, and then there's people

0:23:44.040 --> 0:23:46.160
<v Speaker 1>doing all the serious work over in say stable coins

0:23:46.280 --> 0:23:48.520
<v Speaker 1>or something like that, and those two things just exist.

0:23:48.760 --> 0:23:51.720
<v Speaker 1>But I think one cannot use the existence of the

0:23:51.720 --> 0:23:54.240
<v Speaker 1>slots in the Vegas casino to write off the work

0:23:54.520 --> 0:23:55.840
<v Speaker 1>atnomment stretching the analogy.

0:23:56.480 --> 0:24:01.480
<v Speaker 3>No, this is good, so because like, yeah, yeah, you're

0:24:01.480 --> 0:24:03.720
<v Speaker 3>excited with there's like, well, your friend Patio eleven would

0:24:03.760 --> 0:24:08.880
<v Speaker 3>say it's a kyic avoidance mechanism. Basically, it's like a yeah.

0:24:08.880 --> 0:24:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Well. The thing about crypto is there's been a lot

0:24:11.720 --> 0:24:14.800
<v Speaker 1>of hype on what crypto is useful for. And so

0:24:14.880 --> 0:24:16.200
<v Speaker 1>for example, if you go back and read the original

0:24:16.240 --> 0:24:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Bitcoin paper, which is a great read. It's a very readable

0:24:18.560 --> 0:24:21.120
<v Speaker 1>original paper, it actually used the word interchange in there

0:24:21.119 --> 0:24:23.040
<v Speaker 1>and talks about kind of the use of bitcoin as

0:24:23.119 --> 0:24:26.840
<v Speaker 1>a payment method. But bitcoin turned out to be certainly

0:24:26.920 --> 0:24:29.080
<v Speaker 1>stock bitcoin, you know, before lightning and everything like that

0:24:29.240 --> 0:24:31.520
<v Speaker 1>should have to be a horrible payment method, like slow expensive,

0:24:31.840 --> 0:24:34.560
<v Speaker 1>let's not do that. And now the technology has matured

0:24:34.960 --> 0:24:37.520
<v Speaker 1>through what has been kind of fourteen years of development.

0:24:37.560 --> 0:24:39.920
<v Speaker 1>I think the crypto haters used this argument that like, well,

0:24:39.960 --> 0:24:41.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, it is the Web in ninety three for

0:24:41.280 --> 0:24:43.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, many many years, whereas the actual web coming along.

0:24:43.640 --> 0:24:46.240
<v Speaker 1>But there's been fourteen years of lots of technical development

0:24:46.320 --> 0:24:50.040
<v Speaker 1>happening such that we've ended up with much more advanced technologies.

0:24:50.040 --> 0:24:52.280
<v Speaker 1>And so what you specifically have now with stable coins

0:24:52.480 --> 0:24:56.240
<v Speaker 1>is you have, firstly, something that's value doesn't change and

0:24:56.280 --> 0:24:58.439
<v Speaker 1>so there's none of the kind of speculation stuff that

0:24:58.480 --> 0:25:01.080
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about. You have something that's actually very technically scalable,

0:25:01.119 --> 0:25:04.680
<v Speaker 1>so with the current L two's there's no real scalability

0:25:04.680 --> 0:25:08.000
<v Speaker 1>issues with them, and you have a pretty sensible construct

0:25:08.080 --> 0:25:10.240
<v Speaker 1>where in a way, it's narrow banking. Right. We've been

0:25:10.240 --> 0:25:12.800
<v Speaker 1>talking about narrow banking in this country for decades, and

0:25:12.840 --> 0:25:15.520
<v Speaker 1>we have ended up with narrow banking through stable coins,

0:25:15.920 --> 0:25:18.119
<v Speaker 1>where let's say a good stable coin, you know that

0:25:18.480 --> 0:25:22.000
<v Speaker 1>like a PAXOS or a USDC. In the case of USDC,

0:25:22.280 --> 0:25:25.120
<v Speaker 1>it is fully backed by short term treasuries. And that

0:25:25.160 --> 0:25:27.720
<v Speaker 1>actually just seems like a pretty good construct to me.

0:25:27.800 --> 0:25:30.120
<v Speaker 1>And so you know, we now make it where you can,

0:25:30.200 --> 0:25:32.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, accept money and strive via crypto. You can

0:25:32.320 --> 0:25:35.080
<v Speaker 1>do some payouts things like that. And the obvious thing

0:25:35.119 --> 0:25:38.840
<v Speaker 1>that people say is true where in the US you

0:25:38.880 --> 0:25:41.719
<v Speaker 1>will be slightly too biased against crypto because the US

0:25:41.800 --> 0:25:43.840
<v Speaker 1>is the world's best currency. You know, the US has

0:25:43.920 --> 0:25:46.600
<v Speaker 1>the world's reserve currency where you get to spend and

0:25:46.920 --> 0:25:50.320
<v Speaker 1>might back exactly. And so of course people in the

0:25:50.440 --> 0:25:52.000
<v Speaker 1>US think the USD is awesome because it is an

0:25:52.040 --> 0:25:54.800
<v Speaker 1>awesome currency, whereas many people in many other countries have

0:25:54.920 --> 0:25:58.000
<v Speaker 1>a much more adversarial relationship with their own currency. And

0:25:58.040 --> 0:25:59.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm not even talking about Zimbabwe, though it is true.

0:26:00.119 --> 0:26:03.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about Turkey, which is a very large country

0:26:03.400 --> 0:26:07.800
<v Speaker 1>and economy and population, but people there do not have

0:26:08.280 --> 0:26:10.720
<v Speaker 1>full faith in the lira, and they think about what's

0:26:10.720 --> 0:26:12.560
<v Speaker 1>a better place to keep money than lira.

0:26:13.000 --> 0:26:15.680
<v Speaker 3>I thin guess the other like US bias is that

0:26:16.400 --> 0:26:19.880
<v Speaker 3>the US government really wants dollar payments to flow through

0:26:19.920 --> 0:26:24.360
<v Speaker 3>the KYCED banking system. And like there's some suspicion that.

0:26:24.359 --> 0:26:27.240
<v Speaker 1>I think all the serious grown up crypto players today,

0:26:27.600 --> 0:26:30.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean they're subject to the fincent travel rule. They

0:26:30.119 --> 0:26:33.159
<v Speaker 1>are ky seeing the actors, and so if you go

0:26:33.240 --> 0:26:36.320
<v Speaker 1>through a crypto flow today, you will see the normal

0:26:36.400 --> 0:26:39.520
<v Speaker 1>frictions of dealing with a regulator financial product where you

0:26:39.560 --> 0:26:41.480
<v Speaker 1>are asked to provide your you know, last for your

0:26:41.520 --> 0:26:43.720
<v Speaker 1>social or upload a driver's license or things like that.

0:26:43.920 --> 0:26:46.480
<v Speaker 1>And so I think just in most of the crypto

0:26:46.560 --> 0:26:48.679
<v Speaker 1>use cases that are being tough. Obviously there's the sketchy

0:26:48.760 --> 0:26:50.680
<v Speaker 1>dark web stuff exists as well, but in most of

0:26:50.680 --> 0:26:53.480
<v Speaker 1>the use cases we are talking about where serious businesses

0:26:53.520 --> 0:26:56.119
<v Speaker 1>like stripe or serious merchants are using crypto, it is

0:26:56.160 --> 0:26:59.600
<v Speaker 1>the custodial lissis part of the crystals.

0:27:00.280 --> 0:27:02.960
<v Speaker 3>On chain, like non costardical transfer.

0:27:02.680 --> 0:27:05.280
<v Speaker 2>Like correct, I'm true. I mean, if you look into

0:27:05.320 --> 0:27:08.240
<v Speaker 2>your crystal ball and you know, it's been fourteen years

0:27:08.240 --> 0:27:11.000
<v Speaker 2>since bitcoin was created, as you said, we've seen a

0:27:11.040 --> 0:27:14.640
<v Speaker 2>ton of technology advancement since then. I mean, you said

0:27:14.640 --> 0:27:17.800
<v Speaker 2>you're quite excited about crypto, but I mean, how far

0:27:17.880 --> 0:27:20.280
<v Speaker 2>can we run that out? Do you think it's the future?

0:27:20.359 --> 0:27:22.560
<v Speaker 2>For example, would you go that far if you look

0:27:22.760 --> 0:27:25.200
<v Speaker 2>fifty one hundred years into the future.

0:27:25.320 --> 0:27:27.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's a singular future. And again there's

0:27:27.800 --> 0:27:30.080
<v Speaker 1>a bit of overpromising that's happened in the crypto world. Again,

0:27:30.119 --> 0:27:32.359
<v Speaker 1>I think that's what gets people's backed up. Actually, speaking

0:27:32.359 --> 0:27:35.480
<v Speaker 1>of bern Hobart, we just Stripe Press published this new book.

0:27:35.600 --> 0:27:37.880
<v Speaker 1>The title is Boom, and the pieces of the book

0:27:38.040 --> 0:27:42.760
<v Speaker 1>is that we generally view financial bubbles as societally net

0:27:42.760 --> 0:27:46.040
<v Speaker 1>negative because you know, they cause misallocation of resources and

0:27:46.080 --> 0:27:48.320
<v Speaker 1>they cause you know, ultimately people lose out. And he

0:27:48.400 --> 0:27:53.760
<v Speaker 1>makes the argument that bubbles provide a societally useful function

0:27:54.119 --> 0:27:58.080
<v Speaker 1>by essentially coordinating efforts. And you know, maybe the dot

0:27:58.119 --> 0:28:01.439
<v Speaker 1>com boom is incorrectly understood as a pets dot common webvan.

0:28:01.520 --> 0:28:03.480
<v Speaker 1>It was really like bit dollars put into it, as

0:28:03.640 --> 0:28:05.679
<v Speaker 1>you guys probably know, it was a telecoms boom, and

0:28:05.720 --> 0:28:07.800
<v Speaker 1>it was a fiber rollout boom. But it led to

0:28:07.840 --> 0:28:11.280
<v Speaker 1>the US having just amazing fiber overcapacity that then led

0:28:11.280 --> 0:28:12.959
<v Speaker 1>to the steady growth of the Internet for the decades

0:28:13.000 --> 0:28:15.560
<v Speaker 1>that followed. And so that's maybe an example of it

0:28:15.600 --> 0:28:18.000
<v Speaker 1>was a bubble, but it was a societally useful bubble

0:28:18.000 --> 0:28:20.280
<v Speaker 1>because then it led to this overcapacity that had lots

0:28:20.320 --> 0:28:22.600
<v Speaker 1>of positive externalities. And I think you make that argument

0:28:22.600 --> 0:28:23.600
<v Speaker 1>about crypto, that.

0:28:24.720 --> 0:28:27.080
<v Speaker 3>Argument made as crypto led to a build out of

0:28:27.640 --> 0:28:29.800
<v Speaker 3>GPUs that led to the AI boomah.

0:28:29.840 --> 0:28:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Oh interesting. I wasn't even making that case. You could

0:28:31.760 --> 0:28:34.159
<v Speaker 1>make that argument too, though obviously there was a lot

0:28:34.200 --> 0:28:37.480
<v Speaker 1>of GPU spent happening even even before crypto. No. I

0:28:37.560 --> 0:28:39.640
<v Speaker 1>was just making the argument that I think the speculative

0:28:39.680 --> 0:28:42.560
<v Speaker 1>side of crypto, you could make the argument pulled in

0:28:42.960 --> 0:28:45.920
<v Speaker 1>attention and resources that was then used to build the

0:28:46.040 --> 0:28:49.400
<v Speaker 1>very boring useful parts of crypto, like you know, ethereum

0:28:49.400 --> 0:28:51.880
<v Speaker 1>to or against stable coins or things like that.

0:28:52.360 --> 0:28:54.000
<v Speaker 3>We could talk more about this. Do you want to

0:28:54.040 --> 0:28:56.240
<v Speaker 3>make sure are we talking about the things you don't

0:28:56.240 --> 0:28:56.840
<v Speaker 3>want to talk you about?

0:28:56.960 --> 0:28:59.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? Great, which we do want to talk about.

0:29:00.640 --> 0:29:04.720
<v Speaker 3>So another money stuff theme that we'll probably do on

0:29:04.760 --> 0:29:08.040
<v Speaker 3>our ad reads is that private markets are the new

0:29:08.040 --> 0:29:12.320
<v Speaker 3>public markets. You guys are among the poster children for that.

0:29:12.400 --> 0:29:15.240
<v Speaker 3>You're at the CFO. Tell me about what it's like

0:29:15.320 --> 0:29:17.960
<v Speaker 3>being private. I don't know, Like, I mean, how should

0:29:17.960 --> 0:29:20.040
<v Speaker 3>I think about like the idea that, like, you're an

0:29:20.120 --> 0:29:24.240
<v Speaker 3>enormous company and you've stayed private and have no enthusiasm

0:29:24.520 --> 0:29:26.560
<v Speaker 3>as far as we know, for going public or even

0:29:26.600 --> 0:29:28.760
<v Speaker 3>talking about this twenty years ago? Would you have been

0:29:28.800 --> 0:29:29.440
<v Speaker 3>able to do that?

0:29:31.200 --> 0:29:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? We spend a lot of time internally at Stripe

0:29:33.960 --> 0:29:37.840
<v Speaker 1>thinking about the value of the Stripe business. I think

0:29:37.840 --> 0:29:39.680
<v Speaker 1>the external world spends a lot of time thinking about

0:29:39.720 --> 0:29:42.640
<v Speaker 1>the value of the Stripe stock price, which are related

0:29:42.760 --> 0:29:47.280
<v Speaker 1>plus different things. We have definitely stayed private longer than

0:29:48.440 --> 0:29:50.840
<v Speaker 1>some people expected. I think we'll continue to stay private

0:29:50.880 --> 0:29:55.720
<v Speaker 1>longer than maybe some people expect. But there's no complex answer.

0:29:55.760 --> 0:29:58.240
<v Speaker 1>It's just a simple answer, which is we don't think

0:29:58.440 --> 0:30:01.520
<v Speaker 1>companies should sleep walk into going public. We think they

0:30:01.520 --> 0:30:06.200
<v Speaker 1>should be deliberate about it. And why would Stripe run

0:30:06.200 --> 0:30:09.400
<v Speaker 1>out and go public. It could be if we wanted

0:30:09.440 --> 0:30:12.920
<v Speaker 1>to sell stock broadly to a retail audience. That's not

0:30:13.000 --> 0:30:14.280
<v Speaker 1>something that we've had that, you know, we just the

0:30:14.360 --> 0:30:17.000
<v Speaker 1>business is profitable, you know, we haven't needed to raise

0:30:17.200 --> 0:30:20.120
<v Speaker 1>very large amounts of capital. A traditional reason might be

0:30:20.360 --> 0:30:22.320
<v Speaker 1>return of capital, not just kind of a capital raise

0:30:22.360 --> 0:30:25.000
<v Speaker 1>for running the business, but return of capital to existing shareholders.

0:30:25.080 --> 0:30:27.200
<v Speaker 1>But again that's where you're maybe referencing the private markets

0:30:27.240 --> 0:30:30.000
<v Speaker 1>have gotten deeper, and you know, in our case, we've

0:30:30.080 --> 0:30:33.520
<v Speaker 1>run two unlimited employee tenders, you know, last year and

0:30:33.680 --> 0:30:36.480
<v Speaker 1>this year. You know, Sequoia just did an LP tender

0:30:36.600 --> 0:30:39.000
<v Speaker 1>where they gave liquidity to some of their LPs, but

0:30:39.600 --> 0:30:42.560
<v Speaker 1>liquidity is available to people in the private markets, and

0:30:42.600 --> 0:30:47.040
<v Speaker 1>so it's more I think the default spring where companies,

0:30:47.080 --> 0:30:49.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, a SaaS company would be started and you know,

0:30:49.920 --> 0:30:51.720
<v Speaker 1>go from zero to one hundred million ar R and

0:30:51.720 --> 0:30:54.200
<v Speaker 1>then just run out and go public. Default is being

0:30:54.280 --> 0:30:56.480
<v Speaker 1>questioned a little bit in Silicon Valley. Obviously lots of

0:30:56.480 --> 0:30:59.400
<v Speaker 1>companies are still going public, but the default is being questioned,

0:30:59.400 --> 0:31:04.960
<v Speaker 1>and the default is more of a Silicon Valley tech

0:31:05.040 --> 0:31:08.800
<v Speaker 1>default than maybe a broader global default. So like in

0:31:08.840 --> 0:31:12.480
<v Speaker 1>financial suit, we know exactly so as Bloomberg employees, you

0:31:12.520 --> 0:31:14.360
<v Speaker 1>may be familiar with it, but Bloomberg is the example

0:31:14.400 --> 0:31:17.000
<v Speaker 1>that everyone cites. But if you just quickly run through

0:31:17.040 --> 0:31:19.840
<v Speaker 1>financial services, you know, take the world's leading market maker,

0:31:19.920 --> 0:31:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Citadel Securities private company, take the world's leading prop trade.

0:31:23.560 --> 0:31:25.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm probably offending one of the world's leading in all

0:31:25.840 --> 0:31:27.680
<v Speaker 1>these cases. So don't defend anyone. But if you look

0:31:27.720 --> 0:31:30.080
<v Speaker 1>at Jane Street, you know, which it's been reported on

0:31:30.120 --> 0:31:32.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot these days, just how good a business it is.

0:31:32.280 --> 0:31:34.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, whether they're at a ten billion profits run

0:31:34.440 --> 0:31:36.960
<v Speaker 1>rate or something like that. Private company Fidelity, when the

0:31:36.960 --> 0:31:40.680
<v Speaker 1>world's leading brokerages, private company Goldban Sachs, your former employer.

0:31:41.000 --> 0:31:43.240
<v Speaker 3>I assume that that a big difference is that a

0:31:43.240 --> 0:31:46.560
<v Speaker 3>lot like Chance Street writes very large checks. And the

0:31:46.680 --> 0:31:49.160
<v Speaker 3>Silicon Valley difference is not just that like you have vcs,

0:31:49.240 --> 0:31:50.640
<v Speaker 3>you might be hunger to get at whereas like said,

0:31:50.640 --> 0:31:52.560
<v Speaker 3>at all dozen, but like it's also you have employees

0:31:52.560 --> 0:31:54.880
<v Speaker 3>who are getting paid in equity and they're getting tender

0:31:54.880 --> 0:31:57.000
<v Speaker 3>as every Oh yeah, like is it tender every year

0:31:57.080 --> 0:31:58.760
<v Speaker 3>just as good as publicly traded stock?

0:31:59.680 --> 0:32:01.560
<v Speaker 1>We think the tender every year is in nice solution.

0:32:01.800 --> 0:32:03.640
<v Speaker 1>And there are some things that will be different if

0:32:03.640 --> 0:32:05.120
<v Speaker 1>we're a public company for the better. There's some things

0:32:05.160 --> 0:32:07.080
<v Speaker 1>that'd be different as a public company for the worse.

0:32:07.200 --> 0:32:09.160
<v Speaker 1>And you get it, you know, trading windows and who's

0:32:09.160 --> 0:32:11.760
<v Speaker 1>an insider and things like that. But it's thus far

0:32:11.800 --> 0:32:13.520
<v Speaker 1>work quite nicely for a solution.

0:32:13.720 --> 0:32:15.640
<v Speaker 2>So is that the model then? Like tender every year,

0:32:15.640 --> 0:32:16.400
<v Speaker 2>you've only done.

0:32:16.240 --> 0:32:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Two, but we don't have forward looking plans to announce,

0:32:20.560 --> 0:32:21.920
<v Speaker 1>and so I'd come back to it at some stage with

0:32:22.320 --> 0:32:24.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, we could go do something that you don't expect,

0:32:24.640 --> 0:32:27.280
<v Speaker 1>and we're not announcing the plans because genuinely it's not

0:32:27.320 --> 0:32:29.320
<v Speaker 1>like there's a written down plan at stride that we're

0:32:29.320 --> 0:32:32.080
<v Speaker 1>going to do this, this and then this. We are

0:32:32.200 --> 0:32:36.880
<v Speaker 1>always reevaluating it. But again, up to this point, it

0:32:36.920 --> 0:32:39.160
<v Speaker 1>has made more sense for us to grow as a

0:32:39.240 --> 0:32:42.640
<v Speaker 1>capital efficient private company, then it's made sense for us

0:32:42.640 --> 0:32:43.400
<v Speaker 1>to be a public company.

0:32:43.440 --> 0:32:46.239
<v Speaker 3>Sure, Like Chancer just makes money every year and they

0:32:46.240 --> 0:32:47.840
<v Speaker 3>don't need to raise capital, and so that.

0:32:47.920 --> 0:32:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Just seems like great business has money to people. Right.

0:32:50.280 --> 0:32:52.600
<v Speaker 3>I don't know what the economics that is, literally, but

0:32:52.640 --> 0:32:55.840
<v Speaker 3>they seem extremely good. But like, it does seem possible

0:32:55.880 --> 0:32:58.520
<v Speaker 3>that you could just make cash every year and fund

0:32:58.560 --> 0:33:00.760
<v Speaker 3>the business out of that, and out of that I.

0:33:00.640 --> 0:33:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Never need to for twenty four, we're trying to make

0:33:02.320 --> 0:33:03.920
<v Speaker 1>a decision for twenty four, and for twenty five, we'll

0:33:03.920 --> 0:33:05.480
<v Speaker 1>try to make a decision for twenty five. So luckily,

0:33:05.520 --> 0:33:07.600
<v Speaker 1>it's not the case that you're faced with a you know,

0:33:07.640 --> 0:33:09.040
<v Speaker 1>a fork in the roads and you have to make

0:33:09.080 --> 0:33:12.440
<v Speaker 1>some kind of permanent decision. We do constantly re evaluated when.

0:33:12.320 --> 0:33:14.840
<v Speaker 3>I write about this topic. One concern that people have

0:33:15.160 --> 0:33:18.240
<v Speaker 3>is that there are a lot of cool companies, like

0:33:18.280 --> 0:33:22.000
<v Speaker 3>an increasing number of them, like fast growing, profitable companies

0:33:22.400 --> 0:33:25.000
<v Speaker 3>that or sorry, I should say fast growing, not profitable

0:33:25.320 --> 0:33:28.520
<v Speaker 3>early stage companies, stage company companies, high growth companies that

0:33:29.000 --> 0:33:32.240
<v Speaker 3>don't go public, and that deprives like ordinary investors of

0:33:32.280 --> 0:33:35.720
<v Speaker 3>access to those companies, and therefore it should be like

0:33:35.720 --> 0:33:38.840
<v Speaker 3>made easier to go public or whatever. Right, So for you,

0:33:40.000 --> 0:33:41.520
<v Speaker 3>do you worry at all about that from like a

0:33:41.600 --> 0:33:44.800
<v Speaker 3>systemic perspective that you're depriving like American retirement savers of

0:33:44.880 --> 0:33:47.520
<v Speaker 3>access to the stripe And then two, you're not entirely

0:33:47.600 --> 0:33:50.920
<v Speaker 3>because there are people who are going around selling stripe

0:33:51.000 --> 0:33:53.200
<v Speaker 3>shares in a way that I believe you do not like.

0:33:53.800 --> 0:33:56.400
<v Speaker 3>And I don't know, like there's like a way around

0:33:56.480 --> 0:33:57.960
<v Speaker 3>of the barrier that you've set up. I guess.

0:33:58.840 --> 0:34:02.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Look, do you think the debate over who should

0:34:02.360 --> 0:34:06.920
<v Speaker 1>be allowed by private assets is a good debate? And

0:34:08.680 --> 0:34:11.160
<v Speaker 1>the accredited investor rule is it's kind of an odd rule,

0:34:11.239 --> 0:34:13.120
<v Speaker 1>like we're able to take it for granted that it's

0:34:13.120 --> 0:34:15.920
<v Speaker 1>been around for a long time, but basically we define

0:34:16.280 --> 0:34:19.359
<v Speaker 1>sophisticated investors as rich people, which is, you know, maybe

0:34:19.440 --> 0:34:21.440
<v Speaker 1>some a historic and in.

0:34:21.520 --> 0:34:23.360
<v Speaker 3>Like a declining standard of rich where it's now like

0:34:23.440 --> 0:34:24.799
<v Speaker 3>sort of upper middle class people.

0:34:24.960 --> 0:34:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Correct. Yeah, So I think debate on that is a

0:34:27.360 --> 0:34:29.759
<v Speaker 1>good thing in Stripes case. You know, most of the

0:34:30.000 --> 0:34:34.320
<v Speaker 1>non employee ownership is through essentially kind of VC funds,

0:34:34.719 --> 0:34:39.120
<v Speaker 1>and the underlying VC fund ownership the LPs there tend

0:34:39.200 --> 0:34:42.719
<v Speaker 1>to be pension funds, college endowments, people. I think we

0:34:42.760 --> 0:34:44.880
<v Speaker 1>feel quite good about making money for it, and so

0:34:45.239 --> 0:34:47.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's the case that's kind of broader society,

0:34:47.560 --> 0:34:50.120
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't get to benefit from the appreciation. I think

0:34:50.120 --> 0:34:52.520
<v Speaker 1>we feel quite good about the LP base of the

0:34:52.840 --> 0:34:55.080
<v Speaker 1>investors that are behind Striping. Again, I think that's another

0:34:55.120 --> 0:34:57.080
<v Speaker 1>thing that has allowed us to stay private for as

0:34:57.120 --> 0:34:59.160
<v Speaker 1>long as we have, which is actually the very long

0:34:59.239 --> 0:35:00.879
<v Speaker 1>term vcs. I think if we had a different set

0:35:00.880 --> 0:35:03.440
<v Speaker 1>of vcs, we would have been less fortunate in being

0:35:03.440 --> 0:35:05.680
<v Speaker 1>able to grow Stripe as a private company because maybe

0:35:05.680 --> 0:35:07.000
<v Speaker 1>they would have felt the need for a win or

0:35:07.000 --> 0:35:08.680
<v Speaker 1>something like that. But I think luckily, you know, Sequahic

0:35:08.760 --> 0:35:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Capital is one of the best VC firms that there

0:35:11.200 --> 0:35:12.680
<v Speaker 1>is that don't quite need to prove themselves.

0:35:12.880 --> 0:35:15.000
<v Speaker 3>They probably count you as a win anyway. Again, they

0:35:15.040 --> 0:35:17.000
<v Speaker 3>probably count you as a win exactly.

0:35:17.080 --> 0:35:17.279
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:35:17.960 --> 0:35:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. And then on the I don't know what you

0:35:19.760 --> 0:35:22.560
<v Speaker 1>call them, but the firms out there at this market.

0:35:22.640 --> 0:35:25.360
<v Speaker 3>We've taught on the podcast about Destiny Tech one hundred,

0:35:25.360 --> 0:35:30.240
<v Speaker 3>which has a private market. I was the fund situation

0:35:30.480 --> 0:35:32.920
<v Speaker 3>with like some Stripe forward contracts, and like there's like

0:35:32.960 --> 0:35:35.520
<v Speaker 3>a general there's like a market for forward contracts, which

0:35:35.560 --> 0:35:38.080
<v Speaker 3>all seemed to be not really approveiate this.

0:35:38.160 --> 0:35:45.520
<v Speaker 1>It's not going to end well because generally hyping financial

0:35:45.640 --> 0:35:50.920
<v Speaker 1>assets has a bad history. It worked out badly with SPACs,

0:35:50.960 --> 0:35:55.120
<v Speaker 1>it worked out badly with icos, and it just tends

0:35:55.120 --> 0:35:57.160
<v Speaker 1>to work out badly, which is why it tends to

0:35:57.200 --> 0:36:00.160
<v Speaker 1>be regulated this. You know, financial regulators tried to in

0:36:00.400 --> 0:36:04.320
<v Speaker 1>the hyping of private assets. And so again Stripe is

0:36:04.360 --> 0:36:07.920
<v Speaker 1>not a public company. We do not enable broad retail

0:36:07.920 --> 0:36:11.759
<v Speaker 1>ownership of Stripe stock, and so if people try to

0:36:13.200 --> 0:36:18.759
<v Speaker 1>back into that by having private company stock in a

0:36:19.280 --> 0:36:21.680
<v Speaker 1>vehicle that that is then available to public mark investors,

0:36:22.280 --> 0:36:25.239
<v Speaker 1>we just think it's not a good construct. Like it's underdisclosed,

0:36:25.480 --> 0:36:28.360
<v Speaker 1>where people are buying an interest in things based on

0:36:28.719 --> 0:36:31.600
<v Speaker 1>name brand recognition but not based on going over the

0:36:31.640 --> 0:36:34.400
<v Speaker 1>financials or understanding what it actually is. They tend to

0:36:34.440 --> 0:36:36.120
<v Speaker 1>all be very high fees. I mean, it depends on

0:36:36.160 --> 0:36:38.160
<v Speaker 1>the vehicle, but they tend to be fairly distractive in

0:36:38.200 --> 0:36:40.600
<v Speaker 1>that way, and so we don't like it. We don't

0:36:41.239 --> 0:36:44.399
<v Speaker 1>we don't permit it, and I'm personally not a fan.

0:36:44.920 --> 0:36:47.160
<v Speaker 2>Is there much that you can do about it? Like

0:36:47.239 --> 0:36:49.600
<v Speaker 2>in the case of a Destiny Tech, for example, that

0:36:49.719 --> 0:36:53.799
<v Speaker 2>says that you know they have stripe forwards zuchorrect. Yeah,

0:36:53.960 --> 0:36:55.440
<v Speaker 2>I mean, what can you do?

0:36:55.600 --> 0:36:57.360
<v Speaker 1>We prohibit forward, So we had a bit of a

0:36:58.239 --> 0:36:59.920
<v Speaker 1>about that people do them anyway?

0:37:01.080 --> 0:37:02.160
<v Speaker 3>Can you then avoid them?

0:37:02.239 --> 0:37:06.920
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know where this goes, Yeah, because right, I.

0:37:06.920 --> 0:37:09.560
<v Speaker 3>Mean, it seems like they're prohibited and people do them.

0:37:09.480 --> 0:37:11.560
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, we put it up on the website just

0:37:11.600 --> 0:37:13.880
<v Speaker 1>to make it abundantly clear, so everyone has the same information.

0:37:14.000 --> 0:37:16.640
<v Speaker 1>It's allowed, they're not allowed. So I don't know. There's

0:37:16.640 --> 0:37:19.000
<v Speaker 1>some areas where people have to read the tea leaves

0:37:19.080 --> 0:37:21.600
<v Speaker 1>or the body language. We tried to make it abundantly clear,

0:37:21.680 --> 0:37:24.160
<v Speaker 1>get out there with the semaphore flags. So this people

0:37:24.440 --> 0:37:25.440
<v Speaker 1>are not in any doubt.

0:37:25.560 --> 0:37:28.000
<v Speaker 2>On the topic of going public. It doesn't sound like

0:37:28.040 --> 0:37:30.440
<v Speaker 2>you're in any rush, obviously, you said in June, and

0:37:30.480 --> 0:37:32.960
<v Speaker 2>I thought this was interesting that many companies make the

0:37:33.000 --> 0:37:36.759
<v Speaker 2>decision to go public too early. That you personally see

0:37:36.840 --> 0:37:39.879
<v Speaker 2>tons of opportunities to change and grow the business quite

0:37:39.920 --> 0:37:42.919
<v Speaker 2>a lot, and I think it's interesting that you want

0:37:42.960 --> 0:37:45.560
<v Speaker 2>to stay private to do that, and I think a

0:37:45.600 --> 0:37:48.279
<v Speaker 2>lot of founders would agree with you. But just the

0:37:48.400 --> 0:37:51.200
<v Speaker 2>fact that, you know, sort of like going public. You

0:37:51.280 --> 0:37:54.680
<v Speaker 2>see this as this sign of maturity and maybe that

0:37:54.800 --> 0:37:57.000
<v Speaker 2>you're not innovating as much as you would in the privates.

0:37:57.360 --> 0:37:57.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:37:57.719 --> 0:38:00.200
<v Speaker 2>It kind of made me think of tech company is

0:38:00.239 --> 0:38:03.640
<v Speaker 2>like offering dividends. Like I remember when Metas started giving

0:38:03.680 --> 0:38:05.960
<v Speaker 2>out dividends earlier this year. Everyone was like, oh, well,

0:38:06.680 --> 0:38:08.480
<v Speaker 2>they're old news now and they're too mature.

0:38:09.000 --> 0:38:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think Meta is the wrong example to use

0:38:11.200 --> 0:38:14.160
<v Speaker 1>for that argument, because they currently seem to be doing

0:38:14.239 --> 0:38:17.319
<v Speaker 1>extraordinarily well in the AI race. And I'm not making

0:38:17.360 --> 0:38:19.640
<v Speaker 1>the claim that you know, one cannot innovate as a

0:38:19.680 --> 0:38:22.120
<v Speaker 1>public company, because that is clearly an absurd claim and

0:38:22.239 --> 0:38:24.160
<v Speaker 1>you would just be kind of constantly slapped in the

0:38:24.160 --> 0:38:26.719
<v Speaker 1>face by counterexamples. And Meta would be the perfect one

0:38:26.840 --> 0:38:28.560
<v Speaker 1>where they just dem at the ring glasses and those

0:38:28.600 --> 0:38:30.719
<v Speaker 1>look amazing, and again they're just nailing it in the

0:38:30.760 --> 0:38:33.520
<v Speaker 1>AI race, and so they'll basically argument I do think

0:38:33.560 --> 0:38:39.759
<v Speaker 1>that on the margin, if you are developing large number

0:38:39.760 --> 0:38:41.840
<v Speaker 1>of new products, if you have a fast growing business,

0:38:42.040 --> 0:38:44.399
<v Speaker 1>if you're constantly reinventing how the business works. And again

0:38:44.440 --> 0:38:47.239
<v Speaker 1>in our case, we are transforming Stripe from not just

0:38:47.280 --> 0:38:49.000
<v Speaker 1>being a payments business to there are all these new

0:38:49.040 --> 0:38:51.120
<v Speaker 1>software lines of business that are much earlier, that are

0:38:51.160 --> 0:38:53.400
<v Speaker 1>harder to predict how they grow. Everything like this. You know,

0:38:53.480 --> 0:38:55.320
<v Speaker 1>we're changing out the underlying payment methods. You know, we

0:38:55.360 --> 0:38:58.720
<v Speaker 1>talked about crypto, we didn't talk about around the world,

0:38:59.040 --> 0:39:01.239
<v Speaker 1>there are all these interesting trends happening in new payment

0:39:01.280 --> 0:39:04.000
<v Speaker 1>methods where are basically bank transfers, and things like UPI

0:39:04.200 --> 0:39:06.040
<v Speaker 1>and picks in Brazil and things like that are becoming

0:39:06.120 --> 0:39:08.200
<v Speaker 1>much more relevant to anyway, the huge amount of change,

0:39:08.560 --> 0:39:13.320
<v Speaker 1>I think on the margin, the public company valuation apparatus

0:39:13.920 --> 0:39:16.640
<v Speaker 1>is set. You see it how people you know, the

0:39:16.719 --> 0:39:17.960
<v Speaker 1>quarter of the earnings and the miss and the beat

0:39:18.000 --> 0:39:23.440
<v Speaker 1>and everything like that. It is optimized for mature, predictable businesses.

0:39:23.480 --> 0:39:27.000
<v Speaker 1>And indeed people talk about kind of business predictability, whereas

0:39:27.400 --> 0:39:29.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, for a business that is still in the

0:39:29.520 --> 0:39:31.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, in the early stages like Stripe, and we

0:39:31.200 --> 0:39:32.920
<v Speaker 1>think about a lot of new products on a five

0:39:33.040 --> 0:39:35.640
<v Speaker 1>or ten year time horizon. Again, I think on the margin,

0:39:35.680 --> 0:39:38.040
<v Speaker 1>there are some benefits to doing that as a private

0:39:38.080 --> 0:39:40.440
<v Speaker 1>company because you get to kind of completely retool the

0:39:40.480 --> 0:39:43.400
<v Speaker 1>business as you go without necessarily wondering about, you know,

0:39:43.640 --> 0:39:45.520
<v Speaker 1>what will the reception be for this in you know,

0:39:45.840 --> 0:39:47.160
<v Speaker 1>the next quarter's earnings release.

0:39:47.520 --> 0:39:51.720
<v Speaker 3>I know you're not in any phase of learning an IPO,

0:39:51.840 --> 0:39:53.400
<v Speaker 3>but I was a capital markets banker, and I know

0:39:53.440 --> 0:39:57.040
<v Speaker 3>you've had thoughts about like the IPO process, and like,

0:39:57.239 --> 0:40:00.279
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if you're doing an IPO, like would

0:40:00.280 --> 0:40:01.520
<v Speaker 3>you change about the process.

0:40:02.000 --> 0:40:05.319
<v Speaker 1>I find all the debates about IPO mechanics really uninteresting

0:40:05.480 --> 0:40:07.520
<v Speaker 1>because it just doesn't matter. Like, if you have a

0:40:07.600 --> 0:40:10.200
<v Speaker 1>great business that's valuable for customers that millions of people

0:40:10.320 --> 0:40:12.640
<v Speaker 1>use and makes money as a result, you can do

0:40:12.800 --> 0:40:14.600
<v Speaker 1>whatever you want. Like, you know, I think Facebook would

0:40:14.600 --> 0:40:16.400
<v Speaker 1>say they botch the IPO, but they have like an

0:40:16.400 --> 0:40:19.200
<v Speaker 1>incredible business, so it doesn't matter and no one remembers it.

0:40:19.440 --> 0:40:21.760
<v Speaker 1>And then you can have like the world's best IPO

0:40:21.840 --> 0:40:23.319
<v Speaker 1>plan and if the business isn't good, it doesn't matter.

0:40:23.360 --> 0:40:25.200
<v Speaker 1>And so people get into all these debates about direct

0:40:25.200 --> 0:40:28.520
<v Speaker 1>listing versus regular IPO and then Bill Gurly complains that

0:40:28.560 --> 0:40:31.080
<v Speaker 1>the bankers are taking too many fees, and then it

0:40:31.239 --> 0:40:34.000
<v Speaker 1>just doesn't matter. Like, build a great business and you

0:40:34.160 --> 0:40:37.319
<v Speaker 1>could write your prospectus on a cocktail mapp and it'll

0:40:37.360 --> 0:40:37.640
<v Speaker 1>be fine.

0:40:37.960 --> 0:40:40.960
<v Speaker 3>Really, this is like why Charliemker doesn't like financial services

0:40:41.000 --> 0:40:44.640
<v Speaker 3>business because you're like like, oh, this is around business.

0:40:45.000 --> 0:40:45.839
<v Speaker 3>It's true, but it's.

0:40:45.760 --> 0:40:48.720
<v Speaker 1>True, right, Yeah. And the thing is investors are smart.

0:40:48.800 --> 0:40:52.279
<v Speaker 1>I think people try to do too much of a

0:40:52.360 --> 0:40:55.120
<v Speaker 1>song and a dance with investor relations and try to

0:40:55.480 --> 0:40:57.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, gin things up. And ultimately, when you meet

0:40:57.800 --> 0:41:00.239
<v Speaker 1>professional investors, you know they're really smart and they look

0:41:00.239 --> 0:41:02.719
<v Speaker 1>through and understand the fundamental dynamics of a business. And

0:41:02.960 --> 0:41:06.320
<v Speaker 1>so the secret to good investor relations is have a

0:41:06.360 --> 0:41:08.000
<v Speaker 1>good business that's growing and it is profitable.

0:41:08.200 --> 0:41:28.440
<v Speaker 2>Where people should do that exactly. Ye, Well, oh you

0:41:28.560 --> 0:41:30.320
<v Speaker 2>have an airport. Do you want to talk about that?

0:41:30.480 --> 0:41:31.000
<v Speaker 2>Is that something?

0:41:31.760 --> 0:41:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Okay?

0:41:32.440 --> 0:41:35.319
<v Speaker 2>Why where did that come from?

0:41:35.880 --> 0:41:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Well? I should not be listened to for any rational

0:41:39.920 --> 0:41:41.120
<v Speaker 1>financial investment advisor.

0:41:41.680 --> 0:41:43.280
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. I don't have the pockets.

0:41:44.480 --> 0:41:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Well, I'm a pilot and an aviation and I grew

0:41:48.160 --> 0:41:50.000
<v Speaker 1>up interested in US and I've been flying since I

0:41:50.120 --> 0:41:52.160
<v Speaker 1>was a teenager and you know, still really love to

0:41:52.160 --> 0:41:54.040
<v Speaker 1>do it, and I'm flying my spare time, and so

0:41:54.360 --> 0:41:57.480
<v Speaker 1>I would say it's not necessarily the most rational business

0:41:57.520 --> 0:42:00.440
<v Speaker 1>interest of mine. But the case the airport, so Dublin

0:42:00.560 --> 0:42:03.600
<v Speaker 1>basically is three airports. Doublin International, which you've been to Dublin,

0:42:03.640 --> 0:42:05.480
<v Speaker 1>that's the one you've been to. I guess three if

0:42:05.480 --> 0:42:07.480
<v Speaker 1>you count the military airport, Belt Donal, and then Western,

0:42:07.480 --> 0:42:09.960
<v Speaker 1>which is the general aviation airport. And so general aviation

0:42:10.120 --> 0:42:11.520
<v Speaker 1>is all the stuff that is not airlines. So it

0:42:11.560 --> 0:42:14.360
<v Speaker 1>could be public service flights like search and rescuer, air ambulance.

0:42:14.520 --> 0:42:16.560
<v Speaker 1>It could be flight training, you know, people getting their

0:42:16.600 --> 0:42:18.560
<v Speaker 1>pilot's licenses. It could be corporate jets, it could be

0:42:18.560 --> 0:42:22.200
<v Speaker 1>all this kind of stuff. And generally speaking, the appropriate

0:42:22.320 --> 0:42:25.239
<v Speaker 1>home for the general aviation stuff is not where all

0:42:25.280 --> 0:42:28.359
<v Speaker 1>the airlines are because they just don't mix that well.

0:42:28.600 --> 0:42:31.680
<v Speaker 1>And so most places will have you know, if someone's

0:42:31.719 --> 0:42:33.880
<v Speaker 1>doing flight training in New York, they'll not do it

0:42:33.960 --> 0:42:36.200
<v Speaker 1>at GfK. They'll do it you know, Westchester or something

0:42:36.239 --> 0:42:38.840
<v Speaker 1>like that. Yeah, Yeah, they really don't mix well. And

0:42:39.560 --> 0:42:42.160
<v Speaker 1>in the case of Dublin's Western Airport, I end up

0:42:42.160 --> 0:42:43.960
<v Speaker 1>buying it back in twenty twenty one, and it needed

0:42:43.960 --> 0:42:46.040
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of investment, and so A bought it and

0:42:46.360 --> 0:42:49.279
<v Speaker 1>we've been investing in giving it the facility that needs around,

0:42:49.600 --> 0:42:52.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, instrument landing capabilities and you know, redoing the

0:42:53.120 --> 0:42:55.279
<v Speaker 1>terminal and the capital stock and things like that, and

0:42:55.400 --> 0:42:57.200
<v Speaker 1>so it's partly I think it's a good I mean,

0:42:57.239 --> 0:42:59.920
<v Speaker 1>they are in the US, they're not for profit businesses.

0:43:00.040 --> 0:43:02.759
<v Speaker 1>They tend to be government owned and federally funded. Internationally

0:43:03.120 --> 0:43:04.840
<v Speaker 1>they are like he throws, a for profit business and

0:43:04.840 --> 0:43:07.000
<v Speaker 1>they just make money off landing fees. And so I

0:43:07.040 --> 0:43:09.640
<v Speaker 1>actually think it will, in the fullness of time, be

0:43:09.760 --> 0:43:12.040
<v Speaker 1>a good business once it's kind of come out on

0:43:12.080 --> 0:43:14.040
<v Speaker 1>the right side of the growth curve. But it's also

0:43:14.200 --> 0:43:14.960
<v Speaker 1>a passion.

0:43:14.680 --> 0:43:17.880
<v Speaker 2>Product in that's awesome. I mean this not as an insult,

0:43:17.960 --> 0:43:21.360
<v Speaker 2>but I feel like to enjoy being a pilot, like

0:43:21.480 --> 0:43:23.320
<v Speaker 2>casually you have to be like a little bit crazy,

0:43:23.840 --> 0:43:26.520
<v Speaker 2>like that seems like an insane proposition, but maybe I'm

0:43:26.600 --> 0:43:27.400
<v Speaker 2>just really risking.

0:43:27.600 --> 0:43:30.960
<v Speaker 1>So no, it just it requires a lot of discipline,

0:43:31.120 --> 0:43:34.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, checklist discipline, and you know, recurrent training. I

0:43:34.719 --> 0:43:38.239
<v Speaker 1>just went through some recurrent training and it just I

0:43:38.280 --> 0:43:41.520
<v Speaker 1>actually find it more interesting because obviously aviation safety is

0:43:41.680 --> 0:43:45.759
<v Speaker 1>generally talked about correctly as one of the best examples

0:43:45.920 --> 0:43:51.200
<v Speaker 1>of process optimization over the last you know, five decades,

0:43:51.440 --> 0:43:53.759
<v Speaker 1>where we have taken a system and just improved the

0:43:53.880 --> 0:43:56.799
<v Speaker 1>crap out of it until it's like so good. If

0:43:56.840 --> 0:43:58.600
<v Speaker 1>they talk guys, how can go buy on Twitter recently

0:43:58.680 --> 0:44:01.840
<v Speaker 1>where the FA doesn't and date car seats on airplanes

0:44:02.080 --> 0:44:05.200
<v Speaker 1>because flying is so safe compared to driving that they're

0:44:05.239 --> 0:44:07.600
<v Speaker 1>worries that if they mandated car seats on airplanes, even

0:44:07.640 --> 0:44:10.520
<v Speaker 1>though like you have a tiny benefit, it would lead

0:44:10.560 --> 0:44:12.799
<v Speaker 1>to people choosing not to fly and choose to drive

0:44:12.840 --> 0:44:15.719
<v Speaker 1>instead and get into car accidents and therefore be net

0:44:15.840 --> 0:44:17.799
<v Speaker 1>less safe. But I find it funny that, you know, again,

0:44:18.160 --> 0:44:21.040
<v Speaker 1>flying an airplane feels like in principle it should be

0:44:21.120 --> 0:44:22.759
<v Speaker 1>like kind of hard to do, and driving car on

0:44:22.800 --> 0:44:25.480
<v Speaker 1>the ground should be easy to but permile. Obviously flying

0:44:25.560 --> 0:44:28.279
<v Speaker 1>wins out, And so again you have this decades and

0:44:28.360 --> 0:44:31.040
<v Speaker 1>decades and decades of history where we've taken the lessons

0:44:31.160 --> 0:44:33.040
<v Speaker 1>of you know, they say the rules and regulations they

0:44:33.040 --> 0:44:34.760
<v Speaker 1>are written in blood. You know, we take the lessons

0:44:34.840 --> 0:44:36.960
<v Speaker 1>of the previous accidents that have happened and then we

0:44:37.040 --> 0:44:39.640
<v Speaker 1>wrap them into future training. And you know, generally, when

0:44:39.640 --> 0:44:42.000
<v Speaker 1>you do pilot training, you're studying a lot of specific

0:44:42.120 --> 0:44:45.040
<v Speaker 1>accidents that happened and you know what the learnings were

0:44:45.120 --> 0:44:47.000
<v Speaker 1>for them. And so I think if you're interested in

0:44:47.560 --> 0:44:51.920
<v Speaker 1>systems design, engineering, process optimization, things like that, lessons.

0:44:51.680 --> 0:44:53.800
<v Speaker 3>From piloting like inform your software engineering.

0:44:54.719 --> 0:44:57.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean they're pretty separate, but I think the software

0:44:57.640 --> 0:45:00.759
<v Speaker 1>engineering brain tends to be a t to flying. And

0:45:00.800 --> 0:45:02.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, you got Palo Alto Airport was a little

0:45:02.440 --> 0:45:05.080
<v Speaker 1>general Afacian airport in the Barians when the busy general

0:45:05.120 --> 0:45:09.800
<v Speaker 1>aviation airports in the entire country. Because I think engineering minds,

0:45:09.880 --> 0:45:12.000
<v Speaker 1>of which there are lots in Palo Alta, tend to

0:45:12.120 --> 0:45:14.480
<v Speaker 1>enjoy it. And again you're mixing you know, a kinesthetic

0:45:14.520 --> 0:45:18.840
<v Speaker 1>skill and meteorology and you know, mechanical understanding of you know,

0:45:18.920 --> 0:45:22.239
<v Speaker 1>a combustion engine and all the attendance systems and you

0:45:22.320 --> 0:45:23.800
<v Speaker 1>know airspace and everything like that.

0:45:23.960 --> 0:45:26.400
<v Speaker 2>So it wasn't like fueled by you being in an

0:45:26.719 --> 0:45:28.960
<v Speaker 2>adrenaline junkie like I want to go fast and I

0:45:29.040 --> 0:45:30.200
<v Speaker 2>want to fly in the sky.

0:45:30.760 --> 0:45:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Adrenaline Like if you're feeling adrenaline while flying you're doing

0:45:33.239 --> 0:45:33.640
<v Speaker 1>something wrong.

0:45:33.800 --> 0:45:35.879
<v Speaker 2>I feel it all the time when flying, like God,

0:45:35.960 --> 0:45:36.920
<v Speaker 2>I hope we stay in the air.

0:45:37.160 --> 0:45:39.600
<v Speaker 1>There was that, you know, you read entron descentic Zuperie

0:45:39.680 --> 0:45:42.360
<v Speaker 1>and you know, flying in Africa during the b nineteen

0:45:42.400 --> 0:45:45.000
<v Speaker 1>twenties in his case, and you know, getting shot down

0:45:45.120 --> 0:45:47.360
<v Speaker 1>and all these kind of things. There clearly was a

0:45:47.680 --> 0:45:49.920
<v Speaker 1>that would make you feel something. Yeah, that exactly. I

0:45:49.960 --> 0:45:51.680
<v Speaker 1>think that kind of stuff would make you feel something.

0:45:51.800 --> 0:45:54.279
<v Speaker 1>But again in these days it has become much more

0:45:54.440 --> 0:45:57.600
<v Speaker 1>safety oriented and the cowboys stuff has been pulled out.

0:45:57.600 --> 0:46:01.520
<v Speaker 1>And again they actually describe one of the cultural challenges

0:46:01.680 --> 0:46:04.400
<v Speaker 1>that happened in the aviation industry underwent was that we

0:46:04.560 --> 0:46:07.279
<v Speaker 1>produced all these military pilots in you know, the World

0:46:07.280 --> 0:46:09.680
<v Speaker 1>War Two, in the Vietnam War, and those people then

0:46:09.719 --> 0:46:13.359
<v Speaker 1>went into you know, PanAm cockpits and they actually kind

0:46:13.360 --> 0:46:15.400
<v Speaker 1>of made bad captains in a certain way because it

0:46:15.560 --> 0:46:17.240
<v Speaker 1>was like very much shut up, this is my cockpit.

0:46:17.520 --> 0:46:21.879
<v Speaker 1>And so the CRM Crew Resource Management, I guess thing

0:46:22.360 --> 0:46:25.680
<v Speaker 1>basically was a multi decade efforts to get rid of

0:46:25.800 --> 0:46:30.239
<v Speaker 1>the the captain mindset and get towards a collaborative problem solving.

0:46:30.160 --> 0:46:33.319
<v Speaker 3>A lot of like I'm going on a like seven

0:46:33.800 --> 0:46:38.279
<v Speaker 3>seven the pilot landed fourteen line carriers, Like that's got

0:46:38.400 --> 0:46:39.920
<v Speaker 3>to be the safest possible way to fly.

0:46:40.000 --> 0:46:42.000
<v Speaker 2>But apparently not, No, he's gone rogue.

0:46:42.320 --> 0:46:44.160
<v Speaker 3>Not listening to his second officer or whatever.

0:46:44.640 --> 0:46:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Do European airlines have a different model than the US

0:46:47.760 --> 0:46:51.279
<v Speaker 1>airlines where they take pilots who have two hundred and

0:46:51.320 --> 0:46:53.560
<v Speaker 1>fifty hours only, which the US would consider very low,

0:46:53.760 --> 0:46:55.520
<v Speaker 1>and they put them in the right seat of airliners

0:46:55.680 --> 0:46:58.000
<v Speaker 1>and they have like a really strong safety record, and

0:46:58.160 --> 0:47:00.080
<v Speaker 1>so as you fly around an airliner in Europe, you

0:47:00.120 --> 0:47:02.359
<v Speaker 1>could have someone who only learned to fly a few

0:47:02.440 --> 0:47:04.320
<v Speaker 1>years ago. And the way they do that is a

0:47:04.400 --> 0:47:07.799
<v Speaker 1>huge amount of standardization, a huge amount of process orientation.

0:47:08.200 --> 0:47:10.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, people make fun of Ryanair for the hard landings,

0:47:10.880 --> 0:47:13.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Ryanair landing in europehere they really plunk

0:47:13.400 --> 0:47:15.440
<v Speaker 1>it on the runway. That is one of their safety

0:47:15.600 --> 0:47:18.399
<v Speaker 1>SOPs where they say a positive landing, as it's known

0:47:18.480 --> 0:47:20.799
<v Speaker 1>in the industry, is safer because it reduces the risk

0:47:20.840 --> 0:47:23.360
<v Speaker 1>of hydroplaning if it's wet, and so it reduces the

0:47:23.560 --> 0:47:25.000
<v Speaker 1>like very small risk that you run off the end

0:47:25.000 --> 0:47:26.480
<v Speaker 1>of the runway if the runway is wet, but we're

0:47:26.520 --> 0:47:28.040
<v Speaker 1>just going to every landing. We're going to plunk it

0:47:28.080 --> 0:47:32.120
<v Speaker 1>on and that's safer. But again, it's generally process orientation,

0:47:32.840 --> 0:47:35.200
<v Speaker 1>standards and a lot of that kind of stuff that's

0:47:35.280 --> 0:47:38.399
<v Speaker 1>driven to safety and not excessive piloting skill. And again,

0:47:38.400 --> 0:47:41.439
<v Speaker 1>if you're relying on incredible piloting skill, something has gone

0:47:41.480 --> 0:47:43.160
<v Speaker 1>wrong in your system. Because we should be able to

0:47:43.440 --> 0:47:46.880
<v Speaker 1>have a seven seven seven full of passengers be safe

0:47:47.040 --> 0:47:49.400
<v Speaker 1>even if the pilots are fatigued or something like that.

0:47:49.960 --> 0:47:52.520
<v Speaker 2>That's wild. I did not know that about Ryanair. I

0:47:52.560 --> 0:47:54.360
<v Speaker 2>feel like they should put that fact out there. You

0:47:54.440 --> 0:47:57.200
<v Speaker 2>know that it's intentional that we're plunking down.

0:47:57.239 --> 0:47:59.120
<v Speaker 1>That's true. Yeah, yeah, because you know it's quite Yeah,

0:47:59.120 --> 0:48:00.759
<v Speaker 1>that's question exactly. Yeah.

0:48:01.840 --> 0:48:02.520
<v Speaker 3>Draw attention to.

0:48:02.600 --> 0:48:05.160
<v Speaker 2>It being uncomfortable, Well, everyone knows.

0:48:06.480 --> 0:48:07.399
<v Speaker 4>That's sure. That's true.

0:48:07.520 --> 0:48:07.959
<v Speaker 1>That's true.

0:48:08.280 --> 0:48:10.440
<v Speaker 3>John Colls and thanks for coming on the Money Stuff Podcast.

0:48:10.600 --> 0:48:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Thank you guys, it's fun our first guests.

0:48:13.200 --> 0:48:22.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm honored, and that was the Money Stuff Podcast.

0:48:22.800 --> 0:48:24.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm Matt Levian and I'm Katie Greifeld.

0:48:25.160 --> 0:48:27.239
<v Speaker 3>You can find my work by subscribing to the Money

0:48:27.239 --> 0:48:29.120
<v Speaker 3>Stuff newsletter at Bloomberg.

0:48:28.680 --> 0:48:31.160
<v Speaker 2>Dot com and you can find me on Bloomberg TV

0:48:31.360 --> 0:48:35.000
<v Speaker 2>every day on Open Interest between nine to eleven am Eastern.

0:48:35.280 --> 0:48:36.960
<v Speaker 3>We'd love to hear from you. You can send an

0:48:37.000 --> 0:48:40.200
<v Speaker 3>email to Moneypod at Bloomberg dot net, ask us a

0:48:40.280 --> 0:48:41.640
<v Speaker 3>question and we might answer it on air.

0:48:42.120 --> 0:48:44.280
<v Speaker 2>You can also subscribe to our show wherever you're listening

0:48:44.400 --> 0:48:46.399
<v Speaker 2>right now and leave us a review. It helps more

0:48:46.400 --> 0:48:47.279
<v Speaker 2>people find the show.

0:48:48.040 --> 0:48:51.240
<v Speaker 3>The Money Stuff Podcast is produced by Annamsarakus and Moses

0:48:51.280 --> 0:48:53.920
<v Speaker 3>I'm Special thanks this week to Stacey wom.

0:48:54.280 --> 0:48:56.320
<v Speaker 2>Our theme music was composed by Blake Maples.

0:48:56.680 --> 0:48:59.200
<v Speaker 3>Brandon Francis Newnhim is our executive producer, and.

0:48:59.239 --> 0:49:01.200
<v Speaker 2>Stage Ballman is Flimberg's head of podcasts.

0:49:01.560 --> 0:49:03.880
<v Speaker 3>Thanks for listening to The Money Stuff Podcast. We'll be

0:49:04.000 --> 0:49:05.400
<v Speaker 3>back next week with more stuff