WEBVTT - Chuck’s Commentary - Massive “No Kings” Protests + Trump’s Illegal War In The Caribbean 

0:00:03.320 --> 0:00:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Hello, They're happy Monday, and welcome to another episode of

0:00:05.960 --> 0:00:09.119
<v Speaker 1>the Chuck Podcast. I got a few emails from some

0:00:09.280 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>of you who wondered how bad my mood was on

0:00:13.760 --> 0:00:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Saturday morning, because I have let you guys know that

0:00:16.760 --> 0:00:20.639
<v Speaker 1>my mood. The one thing University of Miami wins and

0:00:20.680 --> 0:00:23.640
<v Speaker 1>losses do more than any other of my sports teams,

0:00:23.640 --> 0:00:27.640
<v Speaker 1>more than the Packers, more than the Nats, is it

0:00:28.280 --> 0:00:31.360
<v Speaker 1>affects my mood. Here's what I can't admit. I'll have

0:00:31.400 --> 0:00:32.680
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more to say at the end of

0:00:32.720 --> 0:00:35.520
<v Speaker 1>the podcast. I have promised I will keep my sports

0:00:35.560 --> 0:00:38.800
<v Speaker 1>obsessions towards the end so that way the true diehards

0:00:39.960 --> 0:00:43.040
<v Speaker 1>to the Toodcast. We'll get there. We'll get that fix.

0:00:43.800 --> 0:00:47.800
<v Speaker 1>I have a lot to say about the game. I

0:00:48.600 --> 0:00:52.360
<v Speaker 1>hate the idea that I may have predicted this exact

0:00:52.400 --> 0:00:55.320
<v Speaker 1>outcome and how it went. I will get into it.

0:00:55.360 --> 0:00:57.360
<v Speaker 1>I will get into a little bit more. In college football,

0:00:57.480 --> 0:01:01.920
<v Speaker 1>we got another coach firing already, all fascinating to watch.

0:01:02.000 --> 0:01:04.880
<v Speaker 1>At some point, who's going to be left to hire

0:01:05.440 --> 0:01:08.559
<v Speaker 1>all these the amount of money when you have Penn

0:01:08.720 --> 0:01:14.360
<v Speaker 1>State in Florida and Arkansas, huge programs that are going

0:01:14.400 --> 0:01:16.720
<v Speaker 1>to throw all sorts of dollars at their coaching search.

0:01:17.720 --> 0:01:20.559
<v Speaker 1>Don't forget UCLA that has a lot of money. Who

0:01:20.600 --> 0:01:23.520
<v Speaker 1>else follows right down that road? Virginia Tech thinks it's

0:01:23.520 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 1>a major program. What about Clemson? It's clear that Dabo

0:01:27.400 --> 0:01:30.080
<v Speaker 1>was actually worried about his job. Anyway, I said, I

0:01:30.160 --> 0:01:34.440
<v Speaker 1>was going to wait until the end and I will look.

0:01:34.480 --> 0:01:37.840
<v Speaker 1>I think there was the big event of the weekend

0:01:37.880 --> 0:01:43.600
<v Speaker 1>obviously was an O Kings protest. A frankly, a pretty

0:01:45.040 --> 0:01:48.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it was a pretty impressive showing. I think

0:01:48.240 --> 0:01:51.760
<v Speaker 1>what the question with these protests is is what we

0:01:52.280 --> 0:01:55.600
<v Speaker 1>what do we learn from them? Do they translate into something? Look,

0:01:55.640 --> 0:02:01.800
<v Speaker 1>the timing of this protest is not random, Okay, The

0:02:01.840 --> 0:02:04.280
<v Speaker 1>timing of this protest comes basically in the middle of

0:02:04.280 --> 0:02:07.440
<v Speaker 1>early voting here in Virginia. You've got the New Jersey elections.

0:02:07.480 --> 0:02:09.600
<v Speaker 1>You have a bunch of off your elections, right, this

0:02:09.760 --> 0:02:12.320
<v Speaker 1>is these are these are as. My friend John Ellis

0:02:12.320 --> 0:02:14.840
<v Speaker 1>said it's a bunch of local elections that will have

0:02:14.960 --> 0:02:17.960
<v Speaker 1>national significance. And he's not wrong, and they will have

0:02:18.080 --> 0:02:21.720
<v Speaker 1>national significance. What happens in Virginia. How strong is the

0:02:21.760 --> 0:02:24.840
<v Speaker 1>anti Trump vote? Well, we now have an easy measurement

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:28.000
<v Speaker 1>to find out how strong, how powerful are anti Trump

0:02:28.000 --> 0:02:33.600
<v Speaker 1>feelings in Virginia. Are they powerful enough for somebody who's

0:02:33.840 --> 0:02:36.360
<v Speaker 1>not qualified. I think I think has pretty much made it,

0:02:36.960 --> 0:02:40.519
<v Speaker 1>you know, from what has rhetorically said. It's certainly I

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:42.640
<v Speaker 1>think there are questions whether he's qualified to be attorney

0:02:42.680 --> 0:02:45.760
<v Speaker 1>general and Jay Jones, but if he wins, it's really

0:02:45.760 --> 0:02:49.160
<v Speaker 1>a bigger statement on Trump, arguably really than anybody else.

0:02:49.240 --> 0:02:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Not Mer's, not Jones, not anything, you know, because if

0:02:52.560 --> 0:02:56.079
<v Speaker 1>this election is held sort of in isolations, Joan doesn't win,

0:02:56.480 --> 0:02:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Mirs wins this thing, and he still probably wins the

0:03:00.560 --> 0:03:05.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'd still probably rather be him. But we

0:03:05.480 --> 0:03:09.560
<v Speaker 1>know in these statewide elections, gubernatorial the gubernatorial vote has

0:03:09.560 --> 0:03:12.520
<v Speaker 1>a huge impact, and anything north of five points or

0:03:12.639 --> 0:03:16.040
<v Speaker 1>more will bring at least one of the down ballots

0:03:16.040 --> 0:03:19.640
<v Speaker 1>with her, Abigail Spamberger. The question is does it bring two.

0:03:20.080 --> 0:03:22.760
<v Speaker 1>I told you that Jason Miaris has already basically thrown

0:03:23.040 --> 0:03:26.000
<v Speaker 1>the Republican nominee for governor under the bus. Since they

0:03:26.040 --> 0:03:30.680
<v Speaker 1>have divergent strategies on Abigail Spamberger's rhetoric on j Jones,

0:03:30.720 --> 0:03:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Miaris has decided to embrace her rhetoric, even as Winston

0:03:34.240 --> 0:03:36.960
<v Speaker 1>mertle Series has been trying to knock it down. But

0:03:37.080 --> 0:03:40.920
<v Speaker 1>the point is is that when you're doing a political

0:03:40.960 --> 0:03:45.560
<v Speaker 1>protest like this, the true way to measure its impact

0:03:45.560 --> 0:03:48.640
<v Speaker 1>and whether it's having an impact beyond just being an

0:03:48.680 --> 0:03:52.760
<v Speaker 1>event for the day, is whether it translates into political activity. Well,

0:03:52.800 --> 0:03:55.200
<v Speaker 1>the next measurement of political activity is going to be

0:03:56.960 --> 0:03:59.760
<v Speaker 1>the off off year elections that take place in three weeks.

0:04:01.200 --> 0:04:04.640
<v Speaker 1>The timing of this in some ways the smarter campaigns

0:04:04.680 --> 0:04:08.680
<v Speaker 1>in New Jersey, in Virginia, in mayor's races in California

0:04:08.720 --> 0:04:11.960
<v Speaker 1>with the proposition you have Pennsylvania with the Supreme Court races.

0:04:12.360 --> 0:04:16.400
<v Speaker 1>So all of those cases there was likely organizing. We

0:04:16.520 --> 0:04:19.719
<v Speaker 1>know that there was organizing going on in those places

0:04:19.760 --> 0:04:21.720
<v Speaker 1>where there was a direct tide of the election. So

0:04:22.040 --> 0:04:24.800
<v Speaker 1>the point is there's a couple of ways to measure this,

0:04:25.000 --> 0:04:29.200
<v Speaker 1>and that to me is an important way to measure

0:04:29.600 --> 0:04:33.120
<v Speaker 1>I do. I've done, with the help of a bunch

0:04:33.160 --> 0:04:36.680
<v Speaker 1>of news articles searching, I've tried to compile here some

0:04:36.800 --> 0:04:42.039
<v Speaker 1>turnout estimates in various cities. So you can hear here

0:04:42.080 --> 0:04:45.400
<v Speaker 1>in d C sort of the central organizing effort for

0:04:45.480 --> 0:04:48.640
<v Speaker 1>the no Kings protest. The estimate is about over two

0:04:48.680 --> 0:04:53.320
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand of DC area residents. Look, this is a

0:04:53.360 --> 0:04:57.120
<v Speaker 1>bigger turnout than they had in the first one. And again,

0:04:57.600 --> 0:05:00.680
<v Speaker 1>the real you know will know how success full this

0:05:01.040 --> 0:05:05.839
<v Speaker 1>was based on how strong the democratic performance is in Virginia.

0:05:06.440 --> 0:05:09.240
<v Speaker 1>It has been you know, this Jay Jones thing has

0:05:09.279 --> 0:05:11.840
<v Speaker 1>taken a you know, has had a huge impact on

0:05:12.240 --> 0:05:15.440
<v Speaker 1>turnout efforts on a lot of things in Virginia. Does

0:05:15.560 --> 0:05:18.320
<v Speaker 1>this turn the page on that and help Democrats? That's

0:05:18.360 --> 0:05:23.120
<v Speaker 1>a way to measure there. In San Francisco, one organizer

0:05:23.240 --> 0:05:27.600
<v Speaker 1>estimate claimed half a million. Look, it's a city of

0:05:28.080 --> 0:05:30.599
<v Speaker 1>what I would call a protest culture, very comfortable out

0:05:30.600 --> 0:05:33.599
<v Speaker 1>there protesting, So not surprising that this would be the

0:05:33.640 --> 0:05:38.920
<v Speaker 1>city with the largest turnout. This tell to me. And

0:05:38.960 --> 0:05:40.560
<v Speaker 1>I've seen the polling, you know, if you want to

0:05:40.560 --> 0:05:45.320
<v Speaker 1>see anecdotal versus polling, and you saw this protest had

0:05:45.320 --> 0:05:50.320
<v Speaker 1>a real focus on the proposition campaign, on the redistricting

0:05:50.360 --> 0:05:54.159
<v Speaker 1>response to Texas there, So I think this tells you something.

0:05:54.200 --> 0:05:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Half a million. Chicago had one hundred thousand grant parks

0:05:58.960 --> 0:06:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Butler Field. It was a march that not surprisingly went

0:06:02.960 --> 0:06:05.840
<v Speaker 1>past Trump Tower as they wanted to do. New York

0:06:05.880 --> 0:06:09.520
<v Speaker 1>City had an estimate of one hundred thousand. The largest

0:06:09.520 --> 0:06:13.040
<v Speaker 1>protests were somewhere in Times Square. That's where you saw

0:06:13.040 --> 0:06:17.680
<v Speaker 1>the most. Portland, Oregon, claimed about forty thousand protesters there.

0:06:17.760 --> 0:06:21.120
<v Speaker 1>They were in a downtown area, carnival like atmosphere. The

0:06:21.120 --> 0:06:26.040
<v Speaker 1>inflatable costumes that we've seen at the detention centers as

0:06:27.160 --> 0:06:30.400
<v Speaker 1>the protesters that the administration keeps accusing of being part

0:06:30.440 --> 0:06:35.560
<v Speaker 1>of this organized effort that they claim as Antifa, the

0:06:36.279 --> 0:06:41.000
<v Speaker 1>inflatable costumes have become a hallmark of Portland. San Diego

0:06:41.320 --> 0:06:46.240
<v Speaker 1>sixty thousand. Not insignificant in a military town. Okay, that's

0:06:46.320 --> 0:06:51.040
<v Speaker 1>a pretty big number for San Diego. Not a protest

0:06:51.080 --> 0:06:54.040
<v Speaker 1>culture there. Speaking of places where you don't normally see

0:06:54.120 --> 0:06:57.239
<v Speaker 1>protest cultures in the deep South, Atlanta only had about

0:06:57.240 --> 0:07:01.920
<v Speaker 1>ten thousand filled the Atlantic CI Civic Center parking lot,

0:07:02.520 --> 0:07:06.599
<v Speaker 1>if you will. But again, the South in general a

0:07:06.640 --> 0:07:10.360
<v Speaker 1>little less of a protest culture. The protest culture California,

0:07:10.720 --> 0:07:14.640
<v Speaker 1>the Northeast, a little bit. In the midwest. Madison, Wisconsin,

0:07:14.720 --> 0:07:19.240
<v Speaker 1>fifteen thousand a march near the state capital. Hartford, Connecticut

0:07:19.680 --> 0:07:23.040
<v Speaker 1>estimate of twelve thousand. San Jose Silicon Valley an estimate

0:07:23.040 --> 0:07:28.760
<v Speaker 1>of twelve thousand, about four thousand in Eugene, Oregon. In

0:07:28.840 --> 0:07:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh downtown Pittsburgh about two to three thousand. It seems

0:07:33.360 --> 0:07:35.600
<v Speaker 1>to be the best estimate I could come up with.

0:07:35.680 --> 0:07:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Their in Sacramento, you had about five thousand. State Capitol

0:07:38.840 --> 0:07:43.960
<v Speaker 1>of California, Roseberg, Oregon. It's a conservative part of Oregon,

0:07:44.040 --> 0:07:47.800
<v Speaker 1>so they were affected. You had a couple thousand show

0:07:47.840 --> 0:07:50.920
<v Speaker 1>up there in a more rural community that's of significance.

0:07:51.000 --> 0:07:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Rice Lake, Wisconsin. Another This is a town of nine

0:07:54.280 --> 0:07:57.960
<v Speaker 1>thousand people, so they claimed essentially that almost ten percent

0:07:58.000 --> 0:08:01.040
<v Speaker 1>of the town turned out to protest at nearly a

0:08:01.120 --> 0:08:04.880
<v Speaker 1>thousand folks there. Juddville, Wisconsin, also a thousand. This is

0:08:04.920 --> 0:08:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Door County community event. This is a little bit closer

0:08:08.040 --> 0:08:10.440
<v Speaker 1>to the green Berry area, if you will, in another

0:08:10.440 --> 0:08:12.840
<v Speaker 1>eleven hundred. So they had a lot of small protests

0:08:13.760 --> 0:08:16.920
<v Speaker 1>turn out in Wisconsin, which isn't surprising, right We've we've

0:08:17.000 --> 0:08:20.320
<v Speaker 1>what we've seen Wisconsin. There's there's quite a bit. Both

0:08:20.360 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 1>parties I think have super activists in they will so

0:08:24.360 --> 0:08:29.679
<v Speaker 1>look the big what I was curious about and nervous about.

0:08:30.680 --> 0:08:33.680
<v Speaker 1>I was curious about the Republican response and nervous about

0:08:33.720 --> 0:08:36.320
<v Speaker 1>the administration's response. Was there anything that was going to

0:08:36.360 --> 0:08:40.280
<v Speaker 1>happen in these demonstrations that was essentially going to be

0:08:40.400 --> 0:08:42.880
<v Speaker 1>bait if you will, or an attempt or would the

0:08:43.520 --> 0:08:46.880
<v Speaker 1>you know was the was Stephen Miller uh and that

0:08:46.960 --> 0:08:50.920
<v Speaker 1>wing of the of the Trump administration where they're essentially

0:08:51.000 --> 0:08:54.360
<v Speaker 1>looking for a confrontation. Would they find a confrontation Here's

0:08:54.400 --> 0:08:57.880
<v Speaker 1>there was no major confrontations like that. So in the

0:08:58.000 --> 0:09:02.520
<v Speaker 1>official level, it feels as if Lawnforce essentially treated this

0:09:02.600 --> 0:09:08.440
<v Speaker 1>protest the way we've treated protests for decades in this country, responsibly,

0:09:08.520 --> 0:09:11.280
<v Speaker 1>with respect. It seems like protesters I saw there was

0:09:11.320 --> 0:09:15.360
<v Speaker 1>a among the tweets. I saw the Austin Police Department,

0:09:15.800 --> 0:09:20.480
<v Speaker 1>it's official Twitter account put out a thank you to

0:09:20.640 --> 0:09:24.040
<v Speaker 1>protesters in't too law enforcement, saying everybody was well behaved

0:09:24.040 --> 0:09:30.439
<v Speaker 1>and respectful, etc. But then we have the social media memes, right,

0:09:30.520 --> 0:09:33.280
<v Speaker 1>the absurdity, and the one that has gotten the most

0:09:33.520 --> 0:09:37.079
<v Speaker 1>is this head scratcher, And it goes to this larger

0:09:37.160 --> 0:09:39.040
<v Speaker 1>issue that I've brought up a few times, which is

0:09:39.040 --> 0:09:41.560
<v Speaker 1>why they were Republican administration, why Donald Trump does not

0:09:41.600 --> 0:09:44.839
<v Speaker 1>believe he's president for all the people. He really only

0:09:44.880 --> 0:09:48.679
<v Speaker 1>believes he's president for his base. It explains his rhetoric

0:09:48.720 --> 0:09:52.520
<v Speaker 1>and explains his decision making. It explains why he seems

0:09:52.240 --> 0:09:55.960
<v Speaker 1>to not care what swing voters think at all. And

0:09:58.040 --> 0:10:06.040
<v Speaker 1>he retweeted this that essentially had a AI personification of

0:10:06.080 --> 0:10:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Trump flying a plane and dropping poop on America, basically

0:10:10.400 --> 0:10:19.040
<v Speaker 1>flying over major cities and dropping poop. Seriously, really, I

0:10:19.080 --> 0:10:23.560
<v Speaker 1>mean it is you know, we're so used to sort

0:10:23.559 --> 0:10:28.199
<v Speaker 1>of the childlike behavior of him at times of this movement,

0:10:28.760 --> 0:10:30.640
<v Speaker 1>there is always I mean, one of the things that

0:10:30.679 --> 0:10:33.200
<v Speaker 1>I've said in the past about him is that there's

0:10:33.679 --> 0:10:37.760
<v Speaker 1>an arrested development quality, right that phrase, mean phrase isn't

0:10:37.840 --> 0:10:40.199
<v Speaker 1>just a great title of a great television show, or

0:10:40.200 --> 0:10:41.840
<v Speaker 1>at least three and a half seasons of a great

0:10:41.840 --> 0:10:47.760
<v Speaker 1>television show, sorry Ron Howard, but it is an actual

0:10:47.840 --> 0:10:50.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of you know, at times, it's as if Donald

0:10:50.480 --> 0:10:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Trump has been thirteen his whole life, right, the mentality

0:10:53.600 --> 0:10:56.679
<v Speaker 1>of a thirteen year old. What he thinks is humorous.

0:10:57.000 --> 0:10:58.760
<v Speaker 1>And I always say what he thinks is humorous because

0:10:58.800 --> 0:11:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump doesn't laugh. Donald Trump doesn't naturally laugh. Go

0:11:02.880 --> 0:11:05.320
<v Speaker 1>tell me where you've found him naturally laugh. He does

0:11:05.360 --> 0:11:10.680
<v Speaker 1>not sort of have the normal social interactions. You know,

0:11:10.679 --> 0:11:13.640
<v Speaker 1>there's always a lot of people attempt to normalize him.

0:11:13.920 --> 0:11:17.240
<v Speaker 1>He is much more normal in person, but in the

0:11:17.360 --> 0:11:23.760
<v Speaker 1>public setting he doesn't quite He doesn't ever use humor.

0:11:24.400 --> 0:11:26.640
<v Speaker 1>I remember the one time he was asked to use

0:11:26.720 --> 0:11:31.080
<v Speaker 1>humor was at the Al Smith dinner in twenty sixteen,

0:11:31.720 --> 0:11:33.880
<v Speaker 1>and he was just so bad at it. He didn't

0:11:33.960 --> 0:11:35.520
<v Speaker 1>know how to do it. He doesn't know how to

0:11:35.559 --> 0:11:37.920
<v Speaker 1>tell a joke, and he doesn't know how to laugh

0:11:38.040 --> 0:11:41.400
<v Speaker 1>very well. It's just if you want to chalk it up.

0:11:41.440 --> 0:11:43.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to sit here and try to diagnose

0:11:43.920 --> 0:11:48.040
<v Speaker 1>him because I'm not trained in psychology to try to

0:11:48.040 --> 0:11:51.400
<v Speaker 1>do that diagnosis. But I find it odd that he

0:11:51.679 --> 0:11:56.120
<v Speaker 1>never ever laughs. Okay, he will laugh along when an

0:11:56.120 --> 0:11:59.560
<v Speaker 1>audience laughs with him, but tell me when you have

0:11:59.559 --> 0:12:02.040
<v Speaker 1>found him do a belly laugh when he's just hanging

0:12:02.120 --> 0:12:05.480
<v Speaker 1>with friends, you know. And I'd actually thrown an aside.

0:12:05.640 --> 0:12:08.480
<v Speaker 1>You know what phrase you never hear connected to Donald

0:12:08.520 --> 0:12:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Trump lifelong friend. There's nobody that is connected to him

0:12:12.800 --> 0:12:16.400
<v Speaker 1>that is ever described as Donald Trump's lifelong friend, Donald

0:12:16.440 --> 0:12:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Trump's former college roommate, Donald Trump's uh friend from grade school.

0:12:25.600 --> 0:12:30.680
<v Speaker 1>Think about that. Every other president we've ever had has

0:12:30.800 --> 0:12:33.679
<v Speaker 1>had a friend circle, particularly once they got to the

0:12:33.720 --> 0:12:36.720
<v Speaker 1>president that really did go back to their college and

0:12:36.800 --> 0:12:39.680
<v Speaker 1>high school years, Right, Because ultimately, who do you trust

0:12:40.040 --> 0:12:43.400
<v Speaker 1>people that knew you before you were somebody? Right, I'm

0:12:43.400 --> 0:12:46.280
<v Speaker 1>one of those one hundred percent true. Right, You're more

0:12:46.520 --> 0:12:49.880
<v Speaker 1>likely to sort of weirdly feel comfortable with people even

0:12:49.960 --> 0:12:52.400
<v Speaker 1>interacted with about if they knew you before you were,

0:12:52.480 --> 0:12:57.600
<v Speaker 1>before you were somehow a boldface name to somebody, not

0:12:57.720 --> 0:13:01.440
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump. It's the it's one of the most Sometimes

0:13:01.440 --> 0:13:03.800
<v Speaker 1>with Donald Trump, I think we forget that there are

0:13:03.880 --> 0:13:10.240
<v Speaker 1>non stories, stuff that doesn't happen, which is worth reporting. Right,

0:13:10.480 --> 0:13:14.280
<v Speaker 1>One thing that doesn't happen anymore. He doesn't travel the country.

0:13:14.360 --> 0:13:17.880
<v Speaker 1>He just doesn't. He doesn't sell his agenda. He doesn't explain,

0:13:18.080 --> 0:13:21.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, he certainly takes plenty of questions. He seems active,

0:13:22.360 --> 0:13:24.559
<v Speaker 1>but he actually doesn't move very often. Yes, he goes

0:13:24.600 --> 0:13:28.520
<v Speaker 1>overseas and he wants his big summits. When's the last

0:13:28.520 --> 0:13:30.760
<v Speaker 1>time he just held a basic rally around the country

0:13:31.240 --> 0:13:34.480
<v Speaker 1>to sell the program. Doesn't do as much, certainly, not

0:13:34.559 --> 0:13:36.520
<v Speaker 1>like he did in the first run. It is a

0:13:36.520 --> 0:13:40.400
<v Speaker 1>reminder that why, I'm pretty confident even if he thought

0:13:40.400 --> 0:13:43.280
<v Speaker 1>he had the legal grounds to run for president, he wouldn't.

0:13:43.800 --> 0:13:46.400
<v Speaker 1>But I want to sum up with one other thing

0:13:46.440 --> 0:13:49.200
<v Speaker 1>about these protests. I said, there's two ways to measure them, right.

0:13:49.440 --> 0:13:51.400
<v Speaker 1>One measurement is going to be coming up on this

0:13:51.520 --> 0:13:55.600
<v Speaker 1>November election day. And you know, did you see you know,

0:13:55.640 --> 0:13:58.400
<v Speaker 1>did it truly? Did they find some new voters that

0:13:58.440 --> 0:14:01.679
<v Speaker 1>hadn't been paying attention? Did they do any voter registration?

0:14:01.760 --> 0:14:03.840
<v Speaker 1>So those are the things to measure. But here's something else.

0:14:05.040 --> 0:14:08.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, the rights very dismissive of this. Even some

0:14:08.320 --> 0:14:11.040
<v Speaker 1>in the center are dismissive. I've had some friends on

0:14:11.080 --> 0:14:13.160
<v Speaker 1>the left that are somewhat well, what are these protests game?

0:14:16.200 --> 0:14:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Here's what I would say. I think it's remarkable that

0:14:18.840 --> 0:14:21.680
<v Speaker 1>somebody wants to do this on a Saturday. There's we're

0:14:21.920 --> 0:14:25.480
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of other things to do, particularly in

0:14:25.560 --> 0:14:28.800
<v Speaker 1>a fall Saturday. Right, I'm obsessed with college football. I'm

0:14:28.800 --> 0:14:32.720
<v Speaker 1>not alone in this. We're in the heart of some

0:14:32.840 --> 0:14:37.200
<v Speaker 1>incredible sports stories right now. Oh my god, show hey o'tani. Right,

0:14:38.920 --> 0:14:43.720
<v Speaker 1>there's so plenty to quote unquote to do. So the

0:14:43.840 --> 0:14:46.920
<v Speaker 1>fact that this got you know, millions across the country

0:14:46.960 --> 0:14:50.400
<v Speaker 1>to turn out these aren't you know you can they can.

0:14:51.000 --> 0:14:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Critics of this can say, well, it was paid for.

0:14:53.560 --> 0:14:56.560
<v Speaker 1>That to me is even more impressive. There's an entire

0:14:56.600 --> 0:14:59.160
<v Speaker 1>group of people willing to fund, willing to put organization

0:14:59.280 --> 0:15:01.520
<v Speaker 1>around it, and they were able to get people to

0:15:01.520 --> 0:15:04.440
<v Speaker 1>show up, you know, to me saying oh they're paid,

0:15:04.760 --> 0:15:09.000
<v Speaker 1>this was paid or all of these things are always

0:15:09.280 --> 0:15:13.520
<v Speaker 1>organized by some entity that has money, right, nobody does it. Yes,

0:15:13.560 --> 0:15:18.840
<v Speaker 1>there are volunteers, but somebody's paying for some. And look,

0:15:19.160 --> 0:15:21.240
<v Speaker 1>I remember, I'm old enough to remember when the left

0:15:21.280 --> 0:15:25.240
<v Speaker 1>was very dismissive of the tea Party protests. Oh, it's grasstops.

0:15:25.400 --> 0:15:28.520
<v Speaker 1>I was told, you know, you know, don't overrate it.

0:15:28.880 --> 0:15:30.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, that would be the pushback, just like I'm

0:15:30.640 --> 0:15:34.280
<v Speaker 1>hearing from the right. Last time I checked, those twenty

0:15:34.920 --> 0:15:38.000
<v Speaker 1>ten mid terms were pretty rough on the Democrats. Those

0:15:38.040 --> 0:15:42.080
<v Speaker 1>tea Party protests seemed to tap into something, and certainly

0:15:42.080 --> 0:15:46.840
<v Speaker 1>the tea parties I think is was a you certainly

0:15:47.520 --> 0:15:50.000
<v Speaker 1>you don't have Donald Trump without those tea Party protests

0:15:50.080 --> 0:15:54.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty ten, twenty nine, ten, twenty eleven, So just it

0:15:54.600 --> 0:15:58.040
<v Speaker 1>certainly had I think so I would not at all

0:15:58.920 --> 0:16:03.560
<v Speaker 1>be dismissive of this, and I think you know again,

0:16:04.520 --> 0:16:11.000
<v Speaker 1>will I think these protests effectiveness will be judged down

0:16:11.040 --> 0:16:14.960
<v Speaker 1>the road right initially election Day twenty twenty five and

0:16:15.000 --> 0:16:18.480
<v Speaker 1>then election Day twenty twenty six. But I want to

0:16:18.480 --> 0:16:21.120
<v Speaker 1>pivot here to what really is the main story I

0:16:21.200 --> 0:16:30.400
<v Speaker 1>want to focus on this weekend, and that is the growing,

0:16:30.440 --> 0:16:34.360
<v Speaker 1>I think controversial controversy that's taking place in the Caribbean

0:16:34.440 --> 0:16:38.840
<v Speaker 1>right now. And what is where even the administration isn't

0:16:38.960 --> 0:16:42.560
<v Speaker 1>quite sure of how legal their bombings are. And I'll

0:16:42.560 --> 0:16:45.640
<v Speaker 1>explain why even though they claim they're legal, their actions

0:16:45.680 --> 0:16:49.320
<v Speaker 1>are actually admitting that they know there are legal questions

0:16:49.360 --> 0:16:51.600
<v Speaker 1>about what they are up to. But before I get there,

0:16:52.480 --> 0:16:54.280
<v Speaker 1>it is weird for me not to talk about the

0:16:54.320 --> 0:16:58.640
<v Speaker 1>government shutdown. Right, here's what's amazing again. The most of

0:16:58.680 --> 0:17:02.360
<v Speaker 1>the Sunday shows were about the protests, or really about

0:17:02.840 --> 0:17:06.560
<v Speaker 1>this debate over is it legal? The what the administration

0:17:06.720 --> 0:17:10.760
<v Speaker 1>is doing targeting narco traffickers and just calling it a

0:17:10.840 --> 0:17:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Marco terrorist. Does that make them enemy combatants? Does that

0:17:13.640 --> 0:17:17.240
<v Speaker 1>mean they're really that? This does fall under a previously

0:17:17.359 --> 0:17:22.640
<v Speaker 1>passed congressional authority of a use of force mission whether

0:17:22.680 --> 0:17:26.520
<v Speaker 1>it's the one that I mean, it's it's astonishing that

0:17:26.600 --> 0:17:28.920
<v Speaker 1>this is sort of loosely. I understand the administration is

0:17:28.960 --> 0:17:32.880
<v Speaker 1>trying to claim the use of a few different authorizations

0:17:32.920 --> 0:17:36.320
<v Speaker 1>to justify this military action. But here's what hasn't happened.

0:17:36.760 --> 0:17:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Nobody really in Congress, I think, is very comfortable with this,

0:17:40.960 --> 0:17:45.119
<v Speaker 1>but there seems to be an odd amount of what

0:17:45.160 --> 0:17:50.800
<v Speaker 1>I would call not silence but muted concern about what

0:17:50.840 --> 0:17:53.399
<v Speaker 1>the administration is doing. And I think a tremendous is

0:17:53.440 --> 0:17:57.919
<v Speaker 1>just another reminder Congress is not working. Okay, Congress is

0:17:58.160 --> 0:18:01.200
<v Speaker 1>failing at its job of what that's what it's supposed

0:18:01.240 --> 0:18:04.639
<v Speaker 1>to do. Zero oversight takes place. You're supposed to do

0:18:04.720 --> 0:18:07.679
<v Speaker 1>oversight even when your party's in charge. This is the

0:18:07.800 --> 0:18:10.760
<v Speaker 1>exact thing that oversight was designed for. In fact, my

0:18:10.840 --> 0:18:13.280
<v Speaker 1>history lesson later in this episode is going to be

0:18:13.359 --> 0:18:17.600
<v Speaker 1>about the birth of congressional oversight. There was a scandal

0:18:17.640 --> 0:18:20.720
<v Speaker 1>in the twentieth century that where we didn't have oversight,

0:18:20.880 --> 0:18:24.120
<v Speaker 1>We didn't even have inspectors general until this scandal happened,

0:18:24.359 --> 0:18:29.639
<v Speaker 1>and then we got those things. So we are we

0:18:29.680 --> 0:18:32.200
<v Speaker 1>are seeing in a massive failure of the US Congress

0:18:32.200 --> 0:18:34.239
<v Speaker 1>here when it comes to this. But let me just

0:18:34.400 --> 0:18:36.160
<v Speaker 1>get to the shutdown here a second. Then I'll get

0:18:36.200 --> 0:18:41.800
<v Speaker 1>to this, get to the specifics of this fight, of

0:18:41.800 --> 0:18:44.440
<v Speaker 1>this battle over whether this is legal, what we're doing

0:18:44.440 --> 0:18:50.720
<v Speaker 1>in Venezuela. We're now at this full on stalemate. Donald

0:18:50.760 --> 0:18:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Trump is still not engaged in the shutdown negotiations. It

0:18:54.840 --> 0:18:58.960
<v Speaker 1>doesn't appear that Schumer and Jeffries, I mean again, they

0:18:59.000 --> 0:19:01.120
<v Speaker 1>do have the they do have the issue of health

0:19:01.119 --> 0:19:05.000
<v Speaker 1>care on their side. And we are about twelve days

0:19:05.040 --> 0:19:08.920
<v Speaker 1>away from premium notices, massive spikes in Obamacare premiums going

0:19:08.960 --> 0:19:12.280
<v Speaker 1>up on November first, massive spikes going up there. So

0:19:12.320 --> 0:19:17.920
<v Speaker 1>there will certainly be a cranky or public about the

0:19:17.960 --> 0:19:22.399
<v Speaker 1>issue of health care. But in the meantime, this not

0:19:22.840 --> 0:19:25.960
<v Speaker 1>keeping the government open. I just don't. I go back

0:19:25.960 --> 0:19:29.679
<v Speaker 1>to what I said, every single day this government is

0:19:29.720 --> 0:19:33.920
<v Speaker 1>shut is I think a day that Democrats lose whatever

0:19:34.040 --> 0:19:37.119
<v Speaker 1>they think they've gained out of this, and at some point,

0:19:37.440 --> 0:19:43.720
<v Speaker 1>a shuddered government simply harms people's everyday lives, whether it

0:19:43.840 --> 0:19:49.000
<v Speaker 1>is travel, which is the big one, food inspectors, whether

0:19:49.000 --> 0:19:52.560
<v Speaker 1>it's a national weather service. We're just this is ludicrous.

0:19:53.119 --> 0:19:55.800
<v Speaker 1>And then we're getting you know, we have an administration

0:19:55.840 --> 0:19:58.199
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't believe that their job is to govern for

0:19:58.240 --> 0:20:01.120
<v Speaker 1>all the people. It is the weirdest thing. I do

0:20:01.160 --> 0:20:04.480
<v Speaker 1>not understand why more people aren't upset about the fact

0:20:04.520 --> 0:20:09.760
<v Speaker 1>that this administration intentionally governs essentially makes decision based on

0:20:09.800 --> 0:20:11.760
<v Speaker 1>who supports them and who does it. And if they

0:20:11.800 --> 0:20:17.000
<v Speaker 1>think a piece of policy is a democratic policy, they

0:20:17.040 --> 0:20:20.000
<v Speaker 1>cut it. You know, they're just cutting it off. They

0:20:20.000 --> 0:20:23.080
<v Speaker 1>think a cabinet agency is a democratic cabinet agency. They've

0:20:23.119 --> 0:20:26.600
<v Speaker 1>decided the Education Department said democratic cabinet agency, so they

0:20:26.600 --> 0:20:28.359
<v Speaker 1>want to get rid of it. And as I've told you,

0:20:28.359 --> 0:20:31.000
<v Speaker 1>the Department of Homeland Securities they quote Republican agency. And

0:20:31.040 --> 0:20:33.960
<v Speaker 1>there's been hardly any furloughs at all, other than the

0:20:34.359 --> 0:20:36.880
<v Speaker 1>fact that they're getting they're going to get paid late.

0:20:37.000 --> 0:20:38.439
<v Speaker 1>They're not going to get paid on time, and we

0:20:38.440 --> 0:20:40.560
<v Speaker 1>don't know when these folks are going to get paid.

0:20:40.880 --> 0:20:47.240
<v Speaker 1>So this is I think this has turned into a

0:20:47.240 --> 0:20:51.600
<v Speaker 1>cluster of deep if you want, you know, it just is.

0:20:52.520 --> 0:20:58.240
<v Speaker 1>And at some point Democrats are going to have to

0:20:58.240 --> 0:21:00.840
<v Speaker 1>suck it up and open the government. They're going to

0:21:00.920 --> 0:21:06.240
<v Speaker 1>win this healthcare fight political, but they risk sort of losing.

0:21:06.640 --> 0:21:08.600
<v Speaker 1>I go back to this adult in the room issue,

0:21:09.520 --> 0:21:15.080
<v Speaker 1>the fact that they are, the fact that they have

0:21:15.320 --> 0:21:18.160
<v Speaker 1>this power in their hands. And yes, technically Republicans could

0:21:18.200 --> 0:21:19.879
<v Speaker 1>open the government if they got rid of the filibuster.

0:21:20.520 --> 0:21:23.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure anybody. I'm sure all Democrats want to

0:21:23.119 --> 0:21:25.440
<v Speaker 1>see that happen at this point. The fact the only

0:21:25.440 --> 0:21:28.000
<v Speaker 1>reason they have leverage is because the filibuster is still there.

0:21:31.000 --> 0:21:32.840
<v Speaker 1>And I do think there might be some progressives that

0:21:32.840 --> 0:21:34.639
<v Speaker 1>would love to see the filibuster go away, but I

0:21:34.680 --> 0:21:36.919
<v Speaker 1>don't think everybody in the Democratic Party wants to see that,

0:21:40.040 --> 0:21:44.480
<v Speaker 1>So I think they're you know, and again I go

0:21:44.600 --> 0:21:47.240
<v Speaker 1>back to the Democratic Party's inability to know how to

0:21:47.240 --> 0:21:51.000
<v Speaker 1>declare victory, to know when to essentially to know. Look,

0:21:51.800 --> 0:21:54.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's like you're trying to maximize profits all

0:21:54.720 --> 0:21:56.800
<v Speaker 1>the way to the end. Sometimes you sell even if

0:21:56.800 --> 0:21:59.040
<v Speaker 1>you think the stock's going to keep going on, but

0:21:59.160 --> 0:22:01.280
<v Speaker 1>you sell because you have actually think this doctor would

0:22:01.320 --> 0:22:02.880
<v Speaker 1>nose dive, and you may not be there in time

0:22:02.920 --> 0:22:11.960
<v Speaker 1>to sell. There's a reason results matter more than promises,

0:22:12.440 --> 0:22:14.760
<v Speaker 1>just like there's a reason Morgan and Morgan is America's

0:22:14.920 --> 0:22:18.080
<v Speaker 1>largest injury law firm for the last thirty five years,

0:22:18.080 --> 0:22:21.120
<v Speaker 1>they've recovered twenty five billion dollars for more than half

0:22:21.160 --> 0:22:25.280
<v Speaker 1>a million clients. It includes cases where insurance companies offered

0:22:25.359 --> 0:22:28.160
<v Speaker 1>next to nothing, just hoping to get away with paying

0:22:28.200 --> 0:22:31.080
<v Speaker 1>as little as possible. Morgan and Morgan fought back ended

0:22:31.160 --> 0:22:33.879
<v Speaker 1>up winning millions. In fact, in Pennsylvania, one client was

0:22:33.920 --> 0:22:37.760
<v Speaker 1>awarded twenty six million dollars, which was a staggering forty

0:22:37.760 --> 0:22:40.960
<v Speaker 1>times the amount that the insurance company originally offered. That

0:22:41.000 --> 0:22:44.440
<v Speaker 1>original offer six hundred and fifty thousand dollars twenty six million,

0:22:44.720 --> 0:22:46.560
<v Speaker 1>six hundred and fifty thousand dollars. So with more than

0:22:46.600 --> 0:22:48.919
<v Speaker 1>one thousand lawyers across the country, they know how to

0:22:48.920 --> 0:22:51.840
<v Speaker 1>deliver for everyday people. If you're injured, you need a lawyer.

0:22:52.240 --> 0:22:54.520
<v Speaker 1>You need somebody to get your back. Check out for

0:22:54.680 --> 0:22:58.400
<v Speaker 1>the People dot com Slash podcast, or dial pound Law

0:22:58.960 --> 0:23:03.119
<v Speaker 1>Pound five two nine law on your cell phone. And

0:23:03.200 --> 0:23:05.440
<v Speaker 1>remember all law firms are not the same. So check

0:23:05.440 --> 0:23:08.240
<v Speaker 1>out Morgan and Morgan. Their fee is free unless they win.

0:23:13.800 --> 0:23:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Let me move to I feel like I should do

0:23:17.280 --> 0:23:24.200
<v Speaker 1>a pretty large dive now on the issue of Venezuela

0:23:24.760 --> 0:23:30.080
<v Speaker 1>in Colombia because the biggest thing we have learned and

0:23:30.119 --> 0:23:34.080
<v Speaker 1>the biggest sort of tell now that this administration isn't

0:23:34.119 --> 0:23:37.119
<v Speaker 1>sure what it's doing is legal is the decision to

0:23:37.200 --> 0:23:40.360
<v Speaker 1>repatriate two survivors from one of these bombings to their

0:23:40.359 --> 0:23:44.720
<v Speaker 1>home countries. That is the single biggest development of the weekend.

0:23:45.600 --> 0:23:49.240
<v Speaker 1>For that. The resignation, the decision by the head of

0:23:49.280 --> 0:23:54.879
<v Speaker 1>Southern Command to resign is another big development. And look,

0:23:54.960 --> 0:23:58.040
<v Speaker 1>he has not said why he resigned, but I will

0:23:58.080 --> 0:24:00.800
<v Speaker 1>tell you what Jim Stavridi's who also former head of

0:24:00.800 --> 0:24:03.840
<v Speaker 1>Southern Command, also former NATO Suprema like commander, what he

0:24:03.880 --> 0:24:06.760
<v Speaker 1>told me on my news Sphere show last week if

0:24:06.760 --> 0:24:09.119
<v Speaker 1>you were in a similar situation and he weren't sure

0:24:09.240 --> 0:24:12.680
<v Speaker 1>whether an order was legal, and he truly had questions

0:24:12.680 --> 0:24:15.159
<v Speaker 1>about it and worried because remember, if you end up

0:24:15.200 --> 0:24:18.119
<v Speaker 1>executing an illegal order, you will be held accountable in

0:24:18.160 --> 0:24:20.800
<v Speaker 1>our law. So this is not you know, this is

0:24:20.840 --> 0:24:23.240
<v Speaker 1>it didn't work at Nuremberg, right, this is not Ay,

0:24:23.359 --> 0:24:26.240
<v Speaker 1>I just followed an illegal order. Well, if you're concerned

0:24:26.280 --> 0:24:29.080
<v Speaker 1>it's an illegal order, your job is to bring that

0:24:29.240 --> 0:24:32.879
<v Speaker 1>up and then if you're still being ordered to do it,

0:24:33.000 --> 0:24:35.639
<v Speaker 1>basically the honorable thing to do is to resign, and

0:24:35.760 --> 0:24:39.360
<v Speaker 1>that and So this is a case where we're putting two,

0:24:39.600 --> 0:24:42.680
<v Speaker 1>two and two together and we think we're giving four here.

0:24:44.520 --> 0:24:47.119
<v Speaker 1>But to me, you had that resignation and then you

0:24:47.200 --> 0:24:51.560
<v Speaker 1>had this repatriation announcement. This is the tell this administration

0:24:51.800 --> 0:24:59.120
<v Speaker 1>knows it's on unsteady legal ground. So here's what we

0:24:59.160 --> 0:25:02.320
<v Speaker 1>do know. And I'm sure you haven't been paying. Unfortunately,

0:25:02.320 --> 0:25:05.480
<v Speaker 1>this story is not getting the type of attention that

0:25:05.520 --> 0:25:06.879
<v Speaker 1>I think it would get if this were happening in

0:25:06.920 --> 0:25:09.320
<v Speaker 1>the Middle East, this were happening in Asia, this were

0:25:09.320 --> 0:25:11.639
<v Speaker 1>happening in a Mediterranean Sea. But it's happening in the

0:25:11.640 --> 0:25:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Western Hemisphere. And for some reason, when shit happens in

0:25:14.960 --> 0:25:20.080
<v Speaker 1>the Western Hemisphere, we don't prioritize it either in news coverage.

0:25:20.119 --> 0:25:23.679
<v Speaker 1>We don't prioritize it politically, neither party does. We've not

0:25:23.760 --> 0:25:26.240
<v Speaker 1>had a president do it, and in fact, we now

0:25:26.280 --> 0:25:28.120
<v Speaker 1>have a president who I think is about to make

0:25:28.160 --> 0:25:31.560
<v Speaker 1>some of the same mistakes, grave historical mistakes that have

0:25:31.600 --> 0:25:33.680
<v Speaker 1>happened in the past on Latin America. So let me

0:25:33.720 --> 0:25:36.520
<v Speaker 1>get started. So here's the pattern. We keep sinking the

0:25:36.600 --> 0:25:39.719
<v Speaker 1>United States keep sinking boats in the Caribbean, and they

0:25:39.800 --> 0:25:43.960
<v Speaker 1>keep trying to call it something other than war. Right,

0:25:44.040 --> 0:25:46.960
<v Speaker 1>it's not a war, but it's not a law enforcement action.

0:25:47.760 --> 0:25:50.480
<v Speaker 1>They've now carried out seven military strikes and suspected drug

0:25:50.600 --> 0:25:53.680
<v Speaker 1>smuggling vessels off the coast of Venezuela. The latest strike

0:25:53.720 --> 0:25:56.159
<v Speaker 1>has left three people and there were two survivors captured

0:25:57.119 --> 0:25:59.680
<v Speaker 1>and they have been quietly This is the two survivors

0:25:59.680 --> 0:26:02.360
<v Speaker 1>that were patriated to their home countries. One is Columbia

0:26:02.800 --> 0:26:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Colombian and one was Econdorian. So why did they do this? Well,

0:26:07.600 --> 0:26:10.160
<v Speaker 1>that last decision to send them home rather than bring

0:26:10.200 --> 0:26:12.960
<v Speaker 1>them into US custody. Right, Why aren't we boarding these

0:26:13.000 --> 0:26:16.960
<v Speaker 1>boats and seizing this stuff? Right? Why are we just

0:26:17.160 --> 0:26:21.080
<v Speaker 1>deciding to destroy it? Well, it's the most revealing clue

0:26:21.240 --> 0:26:25.199
<v Speaker 1>yet about what's really going on here. So here's what

0:26:25.240 --> 0:26:28.639
<v Speaker 1>officials said on the repatriation decision. Officials said that this

0:26:28.760 --> 0:26:33.720
<v Speaker 1>was a humanitarian gesture, but to legal experts, repatriation looks

0:26:34.080 --> 0:26:37.320
<v Speaker 1>like something else. Entirely. It is a way to avoid

0:26:37.400 --> 0:26:40.840
<v Speaker 1>tough questions about the legal status of these survivors. Are

0:26:40.840 --> 0:26:45.680
<v Speaker 1>they criminals? Are they enemy combatants? Remember we went through

0:26:45.680 --> 0:26:48.040
<v Speaker 1>this during nine to eleven and getmo some of this

0:26:48.160 --> 0:26:50.399
<v Speaker 1>language is going to sound familiar to those of you

0:26:51.200 --> 0:26:55.560
<v Speaker 1>that remember all of those decisions about people. How are

0:26:55.560 --> 0:26:59.960
<v Speaker 1>they picked up these terrorists, these Alcaedo folks. Anyway, So criminals,

0:27:00.080 --> 0:27:04.800
<v Speaker 1>enemy combatants? Are they victims? Because the answer matters a ton.

0:27:05.800 --> 0:27:09.600
<v Speaker 1>It determines what laws end up applying. Do our laws apply,

0:27:09.760 --> 0:27:14.840
<v Speaker 1>do maritime laws apply? Do military courts have the upper

0:27:14.840 --> 0:27:17.840
<v Speaker 1>hand here? If they're treated as combatants, then the US

0:27:17.920 --> 0:27:23.320
<v Speaker 1>is admitting it's an armed conflict. If they're treated as criminals,

0:27:23.400 --> 0:27:28.200
<v Speaker 1>then they have rights to do process, to counsel, to trial.

0:27:29.040 --> 0:27:33.200
<v Speaker 1>That pesky constitution suddenly is in the way. Right by

0:27:33.240 --> 0:27:35.960
<v Speaker 1>sending them back to their home countries, the administration doesn't

0:27:36.000 --> 0:27:39.720
<v Speaker 1>have to choose. It avoids putting anyone in US custody

0:27:40.600 --> 0:27:42.920
<v Speaker 1>and therefore avoids the legal test case that could force

0:27:42.960 --> 0:27:45.400
<v Speaker 1>a court to decide whether America is now at war

0:27:45.680 --> 0:27:53.560
<v Speaker 1>with Venezuela in the Caribbean. I'll tell you this, this

0:27:54.040 --> 0:27:59.480
<v Speaker 1>is at some point, this is going to end up

0:27:59.480 --> 0:28:04.240
<v Speaker 1>in our court. Anyway. You will have perhaps the families

0:28:04.240 --> 0:28:08.560
<v Speaker 1>of victims claim, hey, they were fishing, they weren't part

0:28:08.600 --> 0:28:11.560
<v Speaker 1>of this. Maybe they were simply a worker on one

0:28:11.600 --> 0:28:15.760
<v Speaker 1>of these boats. Maybe they were hired hands. They weren't

0:28:15.800 --> 0:28:19.800
<v Speaker 1>necessarily part of the of the of of whatever the

0:28:19.880 --> 0:28:25.040
<v Speaker 1>narco business that we claim we know what's happening was

0:28:25.080 --> 0:28:29.760
<v Speaker 1>a part of. And it's likely they will try to

0:28:29.880 --> 0:28:33.480
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna look for some sort of uh, they'll probably

0:28:33.520 --> 0:28:36.920
<v Speaker 1>be looking for some sort of monetary justice, and it

0:28:36.960 --> 0:28:40.680
<v Speaker 1>could very well happen in our courts. So we're trying

0:28:40.720 --> 0:28:44.440
<v Speaker 1>to do this repatriation to avoid that. That's what survivors,

0:28:44.760 --> 0:28:47.520
<v Speaker 1>what about with those that didn't survive, just saying this

0:28:47.640 --> 0:28:50.640
<v Speaker 1>is a legal quagmire that is coming, I promise you.

0:28:51.560 --> 0:28:56.560
<v Speaker 1>So the administration, Pete Egseth has been pretty blunt. Here's

0:28:56.560 --> 0:28:59.040
<v Speaker 1>what he said on the Sunday shows this week. The

0:28:59.160 --> 0:29:02.440
<v Speaker 1>United States military will treat these organizations like the terrorists

0:29:02.440 --> 0:29:05.000
<v Speaker 1>they are. They will be hunted and killed just like

0:29:05.080 --> 0:29:09.720
<v Speaker 1>al Qaeda. So he is claiming these are terrorist organizations. Now.

0:29:10.520 --> 0:29:13.520
<v Speaker 1>To truly be a terrorist organization, the basic definition means

0:29:13.560 --> 0:29:15.520
<v Speaker 1>you're using let's say you're narco terrorists. I means you're

0:29:15.560 --> 0:29:18.320
<v Speaker 1>using your drug money to essentially fund this sort of

0:29:18.360 --> 0:29:22.720
<v Speaker 1>political uprising. What political uprisings being funded here? This may

0:29:22.760 --> 0:29:27.479
<v Speaker 1>be simply a criminal enterprise. But I digress. Here's another thing.

0:29:27.520 --> 0:29:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Hag Seth admitted though on Sunday, We've sunk seven boats,

0:29:32.440 --> 0:29:36.600
<v Speaker 1>We've seized nineteen tons of coke. No fentanyl yet, but

0:29:36.680 --> 0:29:42.680
<v Speaker 1>that's next. Whoabody what this whole thing is supposed to

0:29:42.720 --> 0:29:47.520
<v Speaker 1>be about fentanyl. You haven't gotten any fentanyl yet. There's

0:29:47.520 --> 0:29:50.640
<v Speaker 1>a reason for that. Ventanyl ain't a part of Venezuela's

0:29:50.720 --> 0:29:54.280
<v Speaker 1>drug trade. Then I'm going to get to that. But

0:29:54.360 --> 0:29:58.400
<v Speaker 1>no fentanyl yet. It totally undercuts the entire public rationale

0:29:59.040 --> 0:30:01.840
<v Speaker 1>of what Trump and Ruby have been saying about why

0:30:01.880 --> 0:30:04.480
<v Speaker 1>this is legal and about why it should be done

0:30:04.480 --> 0:30:09.000
<v Speaker 1>the way they're doing it. The fentanyl crisis, which we

0:30:09.120 --> 0:30:13.840
<v Speaker 1>do have one, has nothing to do with Venezuela or Columbia.

0:30:14.880 --> 0:30:19.040
<v Speaker 1>It has everything to do with Mexico and China. But

0:30:19.080 --> 0:30:24.440
<v Speaker 1>that's not where we're focused here. So none of these strikes,

0:30:24.920 --> 0:30:27.280
<v Speaker 1>they at least are admitting it. You got to give

0:30:27.280 --> 0:30:30.640
<v Speaker 1>haig Seth credit have actually stopped the flow of fedel

0:30:30.640 --> 0:30:34.440
<v Speaker 1>because they haven't found any fentyl. That's not where it is.

0:30:34.600 --> 0:30:39.600
<v Speaker 1>It's Chinese ingredients being manufactured in Mexico. We've known this

0:30:39.840 --> 0:30:45.360
<v Speaker 1>forever and ain't Venezuela. This is an obsession to get

0:30:45.440 --> 0:30:52.000
<v Speaker 1>rid of Maduro. Frankly, it's a worthy obsession. I empathize

0:30:52.040 --> 0:30:55.680
<v Speaker 1>with it. He's illegally in office. He lost an election,

0:30:55.800 --> 0:30:59.880
<v Speaker 1>a small d democratic election. The lack, frankly that of

0:31:00.080 --> 0:31:05.760
<v Speaker 1>international community of coming down harder on Venezuela over Maduro

0:31:05.880 --> 0:31:10.720
<v Speaker 1>essentially not abiding by the elections, has been extraordinarily disappointed.

0:31:13.760 --> 0:31:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Why this, If this is the you could argue, you

0:31:16.960 --> 0:31:19.040
<v Speaker 1>could make this the rationale. I don't know if a

0:31:19.080 --> 0:31:22.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of people would love it, because I do think

0:31:23.120 --> 0:31:26.560
<v Speaker 1>one of the reasons Trump has a has been able

0:31:26.600 --> 0:31:30.680
<v Speaker 1>to build MAGA and his base is by at least

0:31:30.760 --> 0:31:34.920
<v Speaker 1>rhetorically claiming that America First means we're not going to

0:31:34.920 --> 0:31:37.680
<v Speaker 1>get involved in other people's business, and in this case,

0:31:37.760 --> 0:31:43.719
<v Speaker 1>Venezuela would be other people's business. But the Defense secretary

0:31:43.720 --> 0:31:46.640
<v Speaker 1>admitted they've yet to seize any Fennol here, so you're

0:31:46.760 --> 0:31:53.400
<v Speaker 1>you're essentially bullshit. Rationale for this is going to come

0:31:53.400 --> 0:31:56.000
<v Speaker 1>home to rust. Marco Rubio defended the strikes. He called them,

0:31:56.080 --> 0:31:59.760
<v Speaker 1>quote lethal strikes on drug vessels operated by designated narco

0:32:00.040 --> 0:32:04.719
<v Speaker 1>terrorist organizations. Well, it's a designation that's not quite made up,

0:32:04.760 --> 0:32:09.520
<v Speaker 1>but kind of because we've never really had a narco

0:32:09.600 --> 0:32:13.280
<v Speaker 1>terrorist organization that we've that we've gone after. You could

0:32:13.400 --> 0:32:16.560
<v Speaker 1>loosely claim al Qaeda was narco terrorists because they certainly

0:32:16.840 --> 0:32:20.840
<v Speaker 1>they certainly had the poppy trade in Afghanistan, and certainly

0:32:20.880 --> 0:32:30.400
<v Speaker 1>they were using that money to fund their war within Afghanistan. Now,

0:32:30.520 --> 0:32:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Rubio has been he's trying to be extraordinary careful in

0:32:33.960 --> 0:32:36.880
<v Speaker 1>what he says in public. He insists that hits are targeted,

0:32:36.920 --> 0:32:39.640
<v Speaker 1>that they're not invasions, and that the president is not

0:32:39.840 --> 0:32:42.560
<v Speaker 1>is simply waging war on narco terrorists, not on the

0:32:42.600 --> 0:32:48.360
<v Speaker 1>people of Venezuela. And now here's what's fascinating. This latest

0:32:48.400 --> 0:32:51.120
<v Speaker 1>boat that they that they bombed wasn't even head of

0:32:51.160 --> 0:32:53.840
<v Speaker 1>the United States. Rubio noted the latest sub was likely

0:32:53.880 --> 0:32:56.160
<v Speaker 1>bound for Trinidad and Tobago or some other country in

0:32:56.200 --> 0:32:59.840
<v Speaker 1>the Caribbean, not the US mainland. He had another inconvenient fact,

0:33:01.280 --> 0:33:05.600
<v Speaker 1>if the goal is to stop drugs from reaching American streets,

0:33:06.920 --> 0:33:10.480
<v Speaker 1>so here's where the story gets even a bit murcurer.

0:33:10.840 --> 0:33:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Congress has not authorized any of this. What the administration

0:33:14.960 --> 0:33:19.640
<v Speaker 1>is trying to do is use older authorization use of

0:33:19.680 --> 0:33:23.320
<v Speaker 1>military force. Other aumfs out there, the big one from

0:33:23.360 --> 0:33:25.800
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and one, which never named a single organization

0:33:25.880 --> 0:33:28.440
<v Speaker 1>in it. This is what's been used for all sorts

0:33:28.440 --> 0:33:32.960
<v Speaker 1>of operations by multiple presidents, even as multiple even as

0:33:32.960 --> 0:33:35.720
<v Speaker 1>a both Obama and Trump and Biden, all three of

0:33:35.720 --> 0:33:39.480
<v Speaker 1>them at some point admitted that this AAMF needs to change,

0:33:39.960 --> 0:33:45.000
<v Speaker 1>but they didn't exactly urge Congress to do it. They said, yeah,

0:33:45.040 --> 0:33:47.840
<v Speaker 1>if Congress sends me something I would I would sign it.

0:33:48.520 --> 0:33:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Congress has not been able because it is a It

0:33:51.680 --> 0:33:54.560
<v Speaker 1>is a fake. This is one of those fake issues

0:33:54.560 --> 0:33:57.920
<v Speaker 1>in Washington where everybody says that what the correct answer,

0:33:58.400 --> 0:34:00.480
<v Speaker 1>but behind the scenes they do everything they can to

0:34:00.520 --> 0:34:03.239
<v Speaker 1>make sure that answer doesn't come to fruition, right, and

0:34:03.320 --> 0:34:06.800
<v Speaker 1>getting rid of this authorization use of Military Force Post

0:34:06.920 --> 0:34:09.560
<v Speaker 1>nine to eleven that has been used for all sorts

0:34:09.600 --> 0:34:15.280
<v Speaker 1>of questionable military activity every time there's been bipartisan efforts

0:34:15.360 --> 0:34:18.640
<v Speaker 1>to get rid of it, and just when those bipartisan

0:34:18.680 --> 0:34:22.200
<v Speaker 1>efforts happened, there's bipartisan efforts to kill it, and there's

0:34:22.239 --> 0:34:25.000
<v Speaker 1>always enough force to kill it behind the scenes. But

0:34:25.080 --> 0:34:27.920
<v Speaker 1>it makes it look like, oh, they're trying, but I digress.

0:34:28.719 --> 0:34:31.879
<v Speaker 1>So here's what various members of Congress have said. None

0:34:31.920 --> 0:34:34.960
<v Speaker 1>of them believe this has been authorized. Mark Kelley, Democrat,

0:34:35.080 --> 0:34:37.640
<v Speaker 1>said after a classified briefing on these issues. He said

0:34:37.960 --> 0:34:40.560
<v Speaker 1>they had a very hard time explaining the legal rationale

0:34:40.840 --> 0:34:43.960
<v Speaker 1>and the constitutionality of doing it. He said the brief

0:34:44.000 --> 0:34:46.759
<v Speaker 1>we got referring to the US Senate had a tremendous number

0:34:46.760 --> 0:34:49.680
<v Speaker 1>of holes in it. Tim Kaine went further, Tim Kaine

0:34:49.680 --> 0:34:52.960
<v Speaker 1>has been on this trying to repeal the original AMF

0:34:53.080 --> 0:34:54.960
<v Speaker 1>or redo it. He's been trying to do it for

0:34:55.400 --> 0:35:01.200
<v Speaker 1>essentially most of his time in the A Senate. If

0:35:01.200 --> 0:35:03.320
<v Speaker 1>my colleagues think of war with Venezuela is a good idea,

0:35:03.320 --> 0:35:07.120
<v Speaker 1>they need to pass an AUMF about just that stop

0:35:07.160 --> 0:35:10.279
<v Speaker 1>the administration from dragging our country into an unauthorized and

0:35:10.400 --> 0:35:14.040
<v Speaker 1>escalating military conflict. And then there's course the loudest Republican

0:35:14.080 --> 0:35:16.880
<v Speaker 1>who's questioned these things. It's Ran Paul, much more of

0:35:16.920 --> 0:35:20.680
<v Speaker 1>a libertarian and frankly, very consistent on these issues in general.

0:35:22.719 --> 0:35:24.440
<v Speaker 1>He said, all of these people have been blown up

0:35:24.480 --> 0:35:27.840
<v Speaker 1>without us knowing their name, without any evidence of a crime.

0:35:28.160 --> 0:35:30.560
<v Speaker 1>We are simply supposed to take the word of Pete

0:35:30.560 --> 0:35:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Hagsat Marco Rubie. All of these folks who are not

0:35:34.719 --> 0:35:37.520
<v Speaker 1>under oath. When they're saying these things, they're simply on camera.

0:35:38.640 --> 0:35:40.839
<v Speaker 1>Keep that in mind. So so far, there's been no

0:35:40.840 --> 0:35:45.239
<v Speaker 1>formal vote, no war powers authorization, no clear oversight, just

0:35:45.280 --> 0:35:48.239
<v Speaker 1>a White House declaring an armed conflict with cartels and

0:35:48.280 --> 0:35:54.000
<v Speaker 1>expanding operations under that banner. By redefining traffickers as unlawful combatants,

0:35:54.719 --> 0:35:58.600
<v Speaker 1>the administration claims the right to use lethal force without

0:35:58.600 --> 0:36:01.960
<v Speaker 1>the normal checks that apply to law enforcement operations or

0:36:02.000 --> 0:36:07.279
<v Speaker 1>to wars formally declared by Congress. Essentially, by having this

0:36:07.560 --> 0:36:15.520
<v Speaker 1>murky nature trumpet, we're just green lighting just the killing

0:36:15.560 --> 0:36:20.239
<v Speaker 1>of folks without having to make a legal case that

0:36:20.280 --> 0:36:24.799
<v Speaker 1>we can do this. It's pretty unconstitutional, it's pretty undemocratic,

0:36:25.960 --> 0:36:28.400
<v Speaker 1>and it is a terrible precedent for us to say,

0:36:29.600 --> 0:36:32.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, who are we to ever lecture any other

0:36:32.600 --> 0:36:35.400
<v Speaker 1>lecture China on the Wigers. Who are we to lecture

0:36:35.440 --> 0:36:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Putin on Ukraine and his sphere of influence for the

0:36:37.960 --> 0:36:42.520
<v Speaker 1>way we're behaving in the Western hemisphere here? There are

0:36:42.640 --> 0:36:46.720
<v Speaker 1>legal ways to do this. The case against Maduro is strong,

0:36:47.360 --> 0:36:51.879
<v Speaker 1>make the goddamn case against Maduro and is illegal co

0:36:51.960 --> 0:36:55.360
<v Speaker 1>opting of the government itself. He lost a free and

0:36:55.400 --> 0:37:01.880
<v Speaker 1>fair election there are actually reasons to do this, instead

0:37:01.880 --> 0:37:05.319
<v Speaker 1>of pretending it's something having to do with fentanyl when

0:37:05.360 --> 0:37:11.640
<v Speaker 1>it has nothing to do with fentyl. The administration's argument

0:37:11.719 --> 0:37:15.239
<v Speaker 1>is that these maritime operations right there claiming it's a

0:37:15.280 --> 0:37:18.239
<v Speaker 1>direct response to the overdose crisis in America and that

0:37:18.280 --> 0:37:21.080
<v Speaker 1>these cartels are killing Americans, so this is self defense.

0:37:21.920 --> 0:37:25.200
<v Speaker 1>But here's the disconnect. Fentanyl, the drug responsible for the

0:37:25.239 --> 0:37:27.920
<v Speaker 1>nearly two hundred thousand US deaths last year, is not

0:37:27.960 --> 0:37:32.120
<v Speaker 1>coming for the Caribbean or Venezuela, according to the DEA.

0:37:32.920 --> 0:37:36.839
<v Speaker 1>You know, again, this administration struggles facts sometimes, but there's

0:37:36.880 --> 0:37:40.400
<v Speaker 1>actual facts that sit out there, and there's data that

0:37:40.480 --> 0:37:43.719
<v Speaker 1>tells you where this fricking fentanyl's coming from. More than

0:37:43.800 --> 0:37:48.239
<v Speaker 1>ninety percent of fentanyl enters through US Mexico lands ports

0:37:48.280 --> 0:37:52.200
<v Speaker 1>of entry. It gets through the regular port of entry

0:37:52.640 --> 0:37:55.719
<v Speaker 1>because it's been impossible to seize. We seize it, but

0:37:55.800 --> 0:37:59.760
<v Speaker 1>other stuff gets through. This fentanyl is produced by Mexican

0:37:59.800 --> 0:38:04.799
<v Speaker 1>car tells, not these Venezuelan cartels, and they're using precursor

0:38:04.880 --> 0:38:08.880
<v Speaker 1>chemicals that they import from China, all of which we

0:38:09.000 --> 0:38:13.360
<v Speaker 1>do know already, all of which the Administration does cherry

0:38:13.400 --> 0:38:16.200
<v Speaker 1>pick whenever they want to get tough on Mexico or

0:38:16.200 --> 0:38:18.960
<v Speaker 1>whenever they want to get tough on China. But what

0:38:19.000 --> 0:38:22.600
<v Speaker 1>they're doing here with Venezuela is manufacturing an argument. That

0:38:22.840 --> 0:38:25.880
<v Speaker 1>is an argument if you wanted to make it with Mexico.

0:38:25.920 --> 0:38:28.000
<v Speaker 1>But we're not. We're not going down that road. That's

0:38:28.040 --> 0:38:34.320
<v Speaker 1>a different story. They're just essentially trying, and they realize

0:38:34.400 --> 0:38:38.200
<v Speaker 1>they're hoping that you, the American taxpayer, and you the

0:38:38.239 --> 0:38:42.520
<v Speaker 1>American public, is just going to conflate Ah, the Venezuelans, Mexico.

0:38:42.560 --> 0:38:47.839
<v Speaker 1>It's all the same. That's how stupid this administration thinks

0:38:47.880 --> 0:38:52.960
<v Speaker 1>you are. They think you're this stupid. They think you're

0:38:53.080 --> 0:38:55.520
<v Speaker 1>that you're going to be able to say all drug

0:38:55.600 --> 0:38:58.600
<v Speaker 1>smugglers are the same. They all look alike. That's how

0:38:58.640 --> 0:39:03.239
<v Speaker 1>stupid they think you are. Nobody says we don't have

0:39:03.280 --> 0:39:06.520
<v Speaker 1>a cocaine problem still in Columbia, a cocaine trafficking issue

0:39:06.560 --> 0:39:10.560
<v Speaker 1>in Venezuela, but it is not the one driving American

0:39:10.640 --> 0:39:14.799
<v Speaker 1>overdose deaths. If this is the rationale, and you better

0:39:14.800 --> 0:39:21.920
<v Speaker 1>be declaring war against these Mexican cartels. Basically, the current

0:39:22.000 --> 0:39:25.400
<v Speaker 1>US campaign has focused on geography. Marco Rubio has been

0:39:25.400 --> 0:39:29.719
<v Speaker 1>obsessed with Venezuela. Understandably, he's a South Floridian. Okay. I

0:39:29.719 --> 0:39:33.200
<v Speaker 1>always said that there's all sorts of biases that people have.

0:39:33.560 --> 0:39:35.359
<v Speaker 1>Some of it is just bias from where you're from.

0:39:35.600 --> 0:39:37.600
<v Speaker 1>I grew up down there. I get it. I have

0:39:37.680 --> 0:39:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Venezuelan friends. I see this. This guy's bad. We've destroyed

0:39:41.760 --> 0:39:45.920
<v Speaker 1>a great country, an incredible culture, and he is it is.

0:39:45.960 --> 0:39:49.520
<v Speaker 1>We got to do more to get the world community,

0:39:49.920 --> 0:39:52.440
<v Speaker 1>get this guy out of here. There's a variety of

0:39:52.480 --> 0:39:55.520
<v Speaker 1>ways to do it. This seems to be a way

0:39:56.239 --> 0:40:02.640
<v Speaker 1>that risks American lives one two risks creating a martyr.

0:40:02.640 --> 0:40:06.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we're gonna we haven't ruled out striking targets

0:40:06.920 --> 0:40:10.640
<v Speaker 1>in Venezuela. My guess is will say, it's places where

0:40:10.640 --> 0:40:17.160
<v Speaker 1>they're manufacturing the drug. This ain't gonna be the jungles

0:40:17.160 --> 0:40:19.000
<v Speaker 1>of Venezuela. Ain't gonna be an easy place to fight

0:40:19.040 --> 0:40:25.560
<v Speaker 1>a war. And you know, let's you know it was

0:40:26.239 --> 0:40:28.920
<v Speaker 1>this is how we get Mission creep. Go look at

0:40:28.920 --> 0:40:35.279
<v Speaker 1>the history in the very beginning of Vietnam. Okay, this

0:40:35.320 --> 0:40:40.960
<v Speaker 1>is how Mission Creep happens. But let's go back to

0:40:40.960 --> 0:40:45.600
<v Speaker 1>what this repatriation really reveals here, because it really is

0:40:45.640 --> 0:40:48.120
<v Speaker 1>the Big Toe. The United States is now flying B

0:40:48.200 --> 0:40:52.720
<v Speaker 1>fifty twos over the Caribbean, deploying Special operation helicopters, sinking boats,

0:40:52.960 --> 0:40:55.440
<v Speaker 1>killing people. It calls narco terras. But when two of

0:40:55.480 --> 0:40:57.560
<v Speaker 1>those survivors are captured alive, they quietly are sent back

0:40:57.600 --> 0:40:59.799
<v Speaker 1>to their home countries, out of sight, out of US,

0:41:00.360 --> 0:41:02.920
<v Speaker 1>and out of court. What the decision tells us is

0:41:02.960 --> 0:41:06.240
<v Speaker 1>that the administration understands they're in a legal gray area

0:41:06.840 --> 0:41:09.600
<v Speaker 1>that they're operating in. And if these men were brought

0:41:09.600 --> 0:41:12.200
<v Speaker 1>back here, judges and journalists would start asking questions, and

0:41:12.239 --> 0:41:14.640
<v Speaker 1>they don't want to have to answer those questions. They'd

0:41:14.680 --> 0:41:17.080
<v Speaker 1>have to answer questions about evidence, about jurisdiction, and what

0:41:17.160 --> 0:41:20.799
<v Speaker 1>rules would actually apply. Congress hasn't authorized this war. None

0:41:20.840 --> 0:41:23.640
<v Speaker 1>of these strikes are legal. The targets aren't attacking the

0:41:23.760 --> 0:41:26.400
<v Speaker 1>United States, the drugs that carry aren't the ones killing Americans,

0:41:26.400 --> 0:41:28.520
<v Speaker 1>and yet the White House keeps calling the self defense,

0:41:29.360 --> 0:41:31.480
<v Speaker 1>which brings us to the term. You've heard the President

0:41:31.560 --> 0:41:34.799
<v Speaker 1>and his cabinet repeat over and over again, narco terrorists.

0:41:35.120 --> 0:41:37.120
<v Speaker 1>What the hell does the term mean? Where did it

0:41:37.160 --> 0:41:45.120
<v Speaker 1>come from? Okay, well, let me tell you it's certainly

0:41:45.239 --> 0:41:50.319
<v Speaker 1>here's the actual definition for Merriam Webster terrorism financed by

0:41:50.320 --> 0:41:55.760
<v Speaker 1>profits from illegal drug trafficking, right, Meaning it's the drugs

0:41:55.760 --> 0:41:59.279
<v Speaker 1>are the drugs are sold to finance the terrorism. Is

0:41:59.280 --> 0:42:03.880
<v Speaker 1>that what's happening? All right? It's a generic term narco terrorism,

0:42:03.880 --> 0:42:06.640
<v Speaker 1>and it refers to the nexus between terrorism, insurgency, and

0:42:06.680 --> 0:42:12.080
<v Speaker 1>drug trafficking. So, as a working definition, a narco terrorist

0:42:12.120 --> 0:42:14.040
<v Speaker 1>is a person or group that uses drug trafficking or

0:42:14.040 --> 0:42:17.040
<v Speaker 1>profits funded to funder carried out acts of violence, intimidation,

0:42:17.200 --> 0:42:20.720
<v Speaker 1>or political corrosion, blurring the lines between criminal and politically

0:42:20.719 --> 0:42:25.000
<v Speaker 1>motivated violence. Can you make an argument Maduro's doing that?

0:42:26.719 --> 0:42:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you could, Right, Maduro is certainly repressing his people.

0:42:31.840 --> 0:42:35.440
<v Speaker 1>He's illegally in office, and he certainly has some sort

0:42:35.480 --> 0:42:41.480
<v Speaker 1>of influence and control over some of these gangs. Now,

0:42:41.520 --> 0:42:45.799
<v Speaker 1>it's not a brand new term. It was first used

0:42:45.800 --> 0:42:49.520
<v Speaker 1>actually in Peru Tero Rissimo. It was used by the

0:42:49.560 --> 0:42:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Peruvian president in nineteen eighty three to describe attacks by

0:42:52.600 --> 0:42:59.120
<v Speaker 1>traffickers on anti narcotics police. But it isn't clear the

0:42:59.280 --> 0:43:01.839
<v Speaker 1>first time the US this government ever really formally used

0:43:01.840 --> 0:43:04.919
<v Speaker 1>it was this year the executive order that Donald Trump,

0:43:04.920 --> 0:43:07.400
<v Speaker 1>signed on his first day back in office, uses the

0:43:07.480 --> 0:43:11.200
<v Speaker 1>vehicle of designating cartels and other organizations as force foreign

0:43:11.280 --> 0:43:18.680
<v Speaker 1>terrorist organization and specifically designated global terrorists. So essentially, it

0:43:18.719 --> 0:43:21.839
<v Speaker 1>was trying to create They created a definition to fit

0:43:23.200 --> 0:43:28.879
<v Speaker 1>the already previous authorized use of military force. That's what

0:43:29.000 --> 0:43:33.640
<v Speaker 1>this is all about. This does not mean Maduro is

0:43:33.680 --> 0:43:37.360
<v Speaker 1>a victim here. Okay, I don't want that. I'm not

0:43:37.920 --> 0:43:42.399
<v Speaker 1>interested in that coming across. But the United States has

0:43:42.440 --> 0:43:47.000
<v Speaker 1>succeeded being the leader of the free world because we rationalized, justify,

0:43:47.080 --> 0:43:50.880
<v Speaker 1>and we make legal arguments for what we do. This

0:43:51.000 --> 0:43:55.239
<v Speaker 1>administration doesn't believe in anything having to do with this Constitution.

0:43:55.560 --> 0:43:58.960
<v Speaker 1>They view the Constitution as an impediment to be worked around,

0:43:59.280 --> 0:44:01.279
<v Speaker 1>and they're always in search of a loophole in the

0:44:01.280 --> 0:44:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Constitution rather than upholding the spirit and the values of it.

0:44:05.560 --> 0:44:10.200
<v Speaker 1>And this is a clear and present danger. You see

0:44:10.200 --> 0:44:13.480
<v Speaker 1>what I did there, This is a clear and present

0:44:13.560 --> 0:44:17.319
<v Speaker 1>danger for the US's influence over Look, he's now mad

0:44:17.360 --> 0:44:21.880
<v Speaker 1>at the Colombian president. Look this guy, they're sort of

0:44:21.920 --> 0:44:26.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, it wasn't the friendliest Colombian leader to get elected.

0:44:27.120 --> 0:44:30.720
<v Speaker 1>That's true. He seems to be a bit more lenient

0:44:30.880 --> 0:44:35.799
<v Speaker 1>with the more socialist leaning Latin American leaders. But you

0:44:35.840 --> 0:44:38.480
<v Speaker 1>know what, he's unpopular in his own country because what

0:44:38.600 --> 0:44:41.760
<v Speaker 1>he promised has not come to fruition. He is likely

0:44:41.880 --> 0:44:45.800
<v Speaker 1>to not survive politically. This is a strong Columbia is

0:44:45.840 --> 0:44:48.719
<v Speaker 1>a strong democracy. The last thing we want to do

0:44:49.640 --> 0:44:53.000
<v Speaker 1>is create a martyr out of this current president. And

0:44:53.080 --> 0:44:58.640
<v Speaker 1>I would just warn this administration if backing out of

0:44:58.840 --> 0:45:02.359
<v Speaker 1>legal deals that we've made with the small This man

0:45:02.480 --> 0:45:06.240
<v Speaker 1>is a democratic small the democratic elected president of Colombia.

0:45:06.320 --> 0:45:12.400
<v Speaker 1>This is not like Maduro the risk of suddenly giving

0:45:12.520 --> 0:45:17.160
<v Speaker 1>him because Colombians don't want to look like that any

0:45:17.239 --> 0:45:21.240
<v Speaker 1>of their leaders are simply puppets of this administration, puppets

0:45:21.280 --> 0:45:25.960
<v Speaker 1>of the United States. The Trump's actions while he's trying

0:45:25.960 --> 0:45:27.920
<v Speaker 1>to send a message to Petro to work with the

0:45:28.000 --> 0:45:30.920
<v Speaker 1>United States instead of working quiet. Look, he's got his

0:45:31.000 --> 0:45:34.719
<v Speaker 1>own migration issues coming from Venezuela. You know, you think

0:45:34.760 --> 0:45:37.080
<v Speaker 1>we've got issues of Venezuela's coming over the border because

0:45:37.080 --> 0:45:41.360
<v Speaker 1>they're trying to flee the oppression of Madurea. So does Colombia.

0:45:41.640 --> 0:45:45.040
<v Speaker 1>But this, you know, our history in Latin America is

0:45:45.080 --> 0:45:49.000
<v Speaker 1>atrocious because we just go down there, always worried only

0:45:49.040 --> 0:45:51.560
<v Speaker 1>about our interests, never seeming to be concerned about the

0:45:51.560 --> 0:45:56.000
<v Speaker 1>people themselves. And we find a way to make more

0:45:56.120 --> 0:45:59.759
<v Speaker 1>enemies out of this place than we do allies. It

0:45:59.840 --> 0:46:03.840
<v Speaker 1>is been you know, fricking China has more allies in

0:46:04.000 --> 0:46:07.600
<v Speaker 1>South America than the United States does. That is a

0:46:07.600 --> 0:46:14.080
<v Speaker 1>big problem. And doing legally questionable military action like this

0:46:15.280 --> 0:46:18.399
<v Speaker 1>only makes it harder for the United States to sort

0:46:18.440 --> 0:46:22.680
<v Speaker 1>of win back Latin America into the US ecosystem rather

0:46:23.040 --> 0:46:27.239
<v Speaker 1>as they're drifting away into the China orbit. So I'm

0:46:27.239 --> 0:46:30.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna stop there. And on the other side, it's the

0:46:30.600 --> 0:46:34.759
<v Speaker 1>toodcast time machine. It's a doozy today. It is not

0:46:35.280 --> 0:46:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Nixon related. That's my only clue. And with that, I'll

0:46:38.520 --> 0:46:53.759
<v Speaker 1>see any other side. It is time for the todcast

0:46:53.800 --> 0:47:05.000
<v Speaker 1>time machine. Where are we going? Where could we be going? Well?

0:47:05.719 --> 0:47:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Where are we going? We are going? And give you

0:47:08.600 --> 0:47:12.160
<v Speaker 1>the date, the specific date here. We are going to

0:47:12.320 --> 0:47:15.640
<v Speaker 1>October twenty fifth. As you know, right, I'm always looking

0:47:15.680 --> 0:47:19.400
<v Speaker 1>at the week, the week we're in, So October twenty fifth,

0:47:19.400 --> 0:47:23.680
<v Speaker 1>this week, where that is the date I am latching

0:47:23.719 --> 0:47:28.200
<v Speaker 1>onto because in October twenty fifth, nineteen twenty nine, the

0:47:28.320 --> 0:47:32.680
<v Speaker 1>United States government and a jury, and a jury made

0:47:32.719 --> 0:47:37.000
<v Speaker 1>up of US citizens convicted the first ever cabinet secretary

0:47:37.160 --> 0:47:41.719
<v Speaker 1>to prison. And it all had to do and in fact,

0:47:41.760 --> 0:47:44.239
<v Speaker 1>it all happened. He gets convicted and a couple of

0:47:44.320 --> 0:47:47.720
<v Speaker 1>days later, the stock market crash and the Roaring Twenties

0:47:47.760 --> 0:47:54.000
<v Speaker 1>come to a total and complete end. But that's where

0:47:54.000 --> 0:47:56.160
<v Speaker 1>I want to bring you. So October twenty fifth, nineteen

0:47:56.200 --> 0:47:58.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty nine. How did we get to that point where

0:47:58.080 --> 0:48:01.840
<v Speaker 1>we prosecuted a cabinet secretary? He was prosecuted for his

0:48:02.000 --> 0:48:06.600
<v Speaker 1>role in so called teapot Dome. So this is I've

0:48:06.600 --> 0:48:10.080
<v Speaker 1>been teasing about this. Let's talk about it. It was the

0:48:10.160 --> 0:48:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Roaring twenties. It was a decade that treated oil like

0:48:14.480 --> 0:48:18.560
<v Speaker 1>we treat data today, the fuel of the future, limitless

0:48:18.640 --> 0:48:22.240
<v Speaker 1>and irresistible. Right, the car was just coming up. Everybody

0:48:22.280 --> 0:48:25.800
<v Speaker 1>realized how important oil was. Well, data is that thing today.

0:48:25.960 --> 0:48:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Just setting that aside there, just be thinking about that.

0:48:29.440 --> 0:48:31.680
<v Speaker 1>But let's go back to the twenties. At the center

0:48:31.719 --> 0:48:33.840
<v Speaker 1>of all of it sat a rock formation in the

0:48:33.880 --> 0:48:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Wyoming Desert that was shaped like a teapot. This is

0:48:36.840 --> 0:48:39.560
<v Speaker 1>how the scandal got its name. Beneath it the US

0:48:39.680 --> 0:48:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Navy had stored millions of barrels of crude oil for

0:48:43.760 --> 0:48:49.000
<v Speaker 1>wartime emergencies. This site was called Teapot Dome. When Warren G.

0:48:49.120 --> 0:48:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Hardy became president in nineteen twenty one, he promised to

0:48:52.239 --> 0:48:56.040
<v Speaker 1>make Washington run like a business. We've heard that before, right.

0:48:56.760 --> 0:48:59.640
<v Speaker 1>He was genial, handsome, little bit more of a salesman

0:48:59.640 --> 0:49:02.600
<v Speaker 1>than man. And his poker knights in the White House

0:49:02.640 --> 0:49:06.839
<v Speaker 1>reflected that the press called his inner circle the Ohio Gang.

0:49:06.960 --> 0:49:11.120
<v Speaker 1>These were members of his regular poker gang. They were

0:49:11.120 --> 0:49:15.000
<v Speaker 1>his friends from Marion, Ohio, Harding's newspaper pals. They were

0:49:15.040 --> 0:49:17.799
<v Speaker 1>campaign backers and other hanger ons who followed into DC.

0:49:18.600 --> 0:49:21.760
<v Speaker 1>The Attorney General Harry Daughtry. He used the Justice Department

0:49:21.760 --> 0:49:25.120
<v Speaker 1>as a political machine, part of the Ohio Gang. Charles

0:49:25.160 --> 0:49:29.080
<v Speaker 1>Forbes at the Veterans Bureau skimmed hospital construction contracts and

0:49:29.160 --> 0:49:33.000
<v Speaker 1>fled to Europe when he got caught. Jess Smith was

0:49:33.160 --> 0:49:37.120
<v Speaker 1>the fixer for Harry Daughtry at Justice. He killed himself

0:49:37.120 --> 0:49:40.640
<v Speaker 1>as investigations began to close in. It was a government

0:49:40.680 --> 0:49:44.200
<v Speaker 1>that looked like a poker table full of cigars and whiskeys,

0:49:44.640 --> 0:49:51.320
<v Speaker 1>and IOUs into that circle stepped another man, Albert Bacon Fall.

0:49:52.160 --> 0:49:55.200
<v Speaker 1>He was a hard drinking former senator from New Mexico.

0:49:56.320 --> 0:50:00.120
<v Speaker 1>Harding admired his frontier swagger. This is New Mexico in

0:50:00.160 --> 0:50:03.760
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen teens and twenties. Right Fall ran the Interior

0:50:03.800 --> 0:50:07.799
<v Speaker 1>Department and he saw those idle Navy oil reserves as

0:50:07.840 --> 0:50:12.879
<v Speaker 1>wasted assets. Harding, trusting his friend mister Fall, signed an

0:50:12.880 --> 0:50:16.920
<v Speaker 1>executive order that quietly transferred control of those fields from

0:50:16.920 --> 0:50:21.279
<v Speaker 1>the Navy to the Interior Department. Fall then leased them

0:50:21.440 --> 0:50:26.680
<v Speaker 1>without competitive bidding to two oil barons, Harry F. Sinclair,

0:50:26.800 --> 0:50:31.320
<v Speaker 1>founder of Sinclair Oil. He took Teapot Dome in Wyoming,

0:50:31.719 --> 0:50:34.600
<v Speaker 1>and yes, that's the same Sinclair era with the green

0:50:34.640 --> 0:50:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Dinosaur logo still operating out of Tulsa today. Edward L.

0:50:39.280 --> 0:50:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Dohiney was the head of the Pan American Petroleum and

0:50:42.960 --> 0:50:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Transport Company. He received the California naval reserves at oil

0:50:48.400 --> 0:50:52.520
<v Speaker 1>reserves at Elk's Elk Hills and Buena Vista. Dony's firm

0:50:52.560 --> 0:50:56.319
<v Speaker 1>would eventually be absorbed into Standard Oil of Indiana, later

0:50:56.400 --> 0:51:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Amaco and then BP Corporate Fossil that still traces roots

0:51:02.600 --> 0:51:06.680
<v Speaker 1>to this deal. So what did Fall get in return? Well,

0:51:06.680 --> 0:51:10.080
<v Speaker 1>he got four hundred thousand dollars, which is seven million

0:51:10.120 --> 0:51:15.560
<v Speaker 1>dollars in today's dollars in loans and gifts. One infamous

0:51:15.600 --> 0:51:19.719
<v Speaker 1>delivery saw Downie's Sun carry a black bag full of

0:51:19.800 --> 0:51:25.560
<v Speaker 1>cash straight into falls Washington apartment. We haven't had fifty

0:51:25.600 --> 0:51:27.920
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars paper bags of cash in any story lately,

0:51:27.920 --> 0:51:31.040
<v Speaker 1>have we? But I digress. When the story leaked in

0:51:31.120 --> 0:51:34.360
<v Speaker 1>nineteen twenty two, the US Senate decided to launch hearings

0:51:34.440 --> 0:51:37.760
<v Speaker 1>led by Senator Thomas Walsh of Montana, a Democrat. Harding,

0:51:37.840 --> 0:51:40.520
<v Speaker 1>weary and embarrassed, set off on a cross country voyage

0:51:40.520 --> 0:51:44.200
<v Speaker 1>of understanding in order to reconnect with the public, Essentially,

0:51:44.480 --> 0:51:47.160
<v Speaker 1>pay no attention to these scandal headlines that you're seeing.

0:51:48.400 --> 0:51:51.200
<v Speaker 1>By the summer of nineteen twenty three, twenty three, rumors

0:51:51.200 --> 0:51:54.360
<v Speaker 1>were swirling not just about Teapot Dome, but about Harding's

0:51:54.400 --> 0:51:57.040
<v Speaker 1>personal life as well. He had carried on a long

0:51:57.080 --> 0:52:00.400
<v Speaker 1>affair with a woman named Nan Britton, who claimed her

0:52:00.480 --> 0:52:03.080
<v Speaker 1>daughter was Harding's child. It's a claim that would be

0:52:03.160 --> 0:52:06.280
<v Speaker 1>confirmed by DNA tests in twenty fifteen. By the way,

0:52:06.520 --> 0:52:10.080
<v Speaker 1>another mistress, Carrie Phillips, had written him hundreds of steamy

0:52:10.160 --> 0:52:15.480
<v Speaker 1>letters the Republican Party would pay to suppress. So when

0:52:15.520 --> 0:52:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Harding collapsed in San Francisco that August nineteen twenty three

0:52:21.520 --> 0:52:24.520
<v Speaker 1>and died suddenly at the age of fifty seven. Remember

0:52:24.520 --> 0:52:27.840
<v Speaker 1>he was a little bit overweight, the whispers spread faster

0:52:27.920 --> 0:52:30.400
<v Speaker 1>than the telegrams. Had he been poisoned this this is

0:52:30.440 --> 0:52:32.759
<v Speaker 1>something to do with teapot, don't had he died in

0:52:32.800 --> 0:52:36.160
<v Speaker 1>bed with another woman. The truth, of course, was more mundane.

0:52:36.200 --> 0:52:38.240
<v Speaker 1>He likely had a heart attack brought on by exhaustion

0:52:38.320 --> 0:52:41.760
<v Speaker 1>and bad health. But the gossip boy did that stick

0:52:41.840 --> 0:52:47.040
<v Speaker 1>because the corruption already felt contagious after his death, President

0:52:47.440 --> 0:52:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Calvin Coolidge silent cow allowed investigators to keep digging because

0:52:51.520 --> 0:52:54.560
<v Speaker 1>he really wasn't that involved in this. In nineteen twenty seven,

0:52:54.600 --> 0:52:58.279
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court voided both leases, calling them products of

0:52:58.320 --> 0:53:02.879
<v Speaker 1>corruption and fraud. And on October twenty fifth, which will

0:53:02.880 --> 0:53:05.320
<v Speaker 1>be coming up pretty soon, so we're almost at the

0:53:05.320 --> 0:53:08.919
<v Speaker 1>one hundredth anniversary, that's the ninety sixth anniversary, Albert Fall

0:53:08.960 --> 0:53:11.360
<v Speaker 1>was convicted of bribery. He'd be the first U. S

0:53:11.440 --> 0:53:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Cabinet member ever sent to prison. He served nine months,

0:53:14.640 --> 0:53:18.360
<v Speaker 1>and he died penniless a decade later. He didn't. I

0:53:18.400 --> 0:53:20.080
<v Speaker 1>guess he didn't have a president that was willing to

0:53:20.120 --> 0:53:24.120
<v Speaker 1>pardon him or commute his sentence. But I digress. That

0:53:24.160 --> 0:53:27.240
<v Speaker 1>convention came the very same week the stock market crash,

0:53:27.520 --> 0:53:31.040
<v Speaker 1>ending the Roaring twenties with some poetic symmetry, a nation

0:53:31.600 --> 0:53:37.000
<v Speaker 1>drunk on speculation finally waking up with a hangover. Look.

0:53:37.920 --> 0:53:40.520
<v Speaker 1>I bring this up not because it's an interesting nugget

0:53:40.520 --> 0:53:43.759
<v Speaker 1>in history, but because, as we know, history as a

0:53:43.760 --> 0:53:47.239
<v Speaker 1>way of not quite repeating itself. But boyd does it run.

0:53:49.200 --> 0:53:51.720
<v Speaker 1>So here we are a century later. The names have changed,

0:53:51.719 --> 0:53:55.040
<v Speaker 1>but the temptation hasn't. One Hundred years ago, it was oilies.

0:53:55.440 --> 0:54:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Now it's the public private partnerships, infrastructure megaprojects, defense start up.

0:54:00.000 --> 0:54:03.880
<v Speaker 1>It's crypto mining zones, social media ventures, all dressed up

0:54:03.920 --> 0:54:07.759
<v Speaker 1>as innovation, all blurring who's serving whom. President Trump has

0:54:07.800 --> 0:54:11.160
<v Speaker 1>made these deals a centerpiece of his second term. Some

0:54:11.200 --> 0:54:15.360
<v Speaker 1>may be legitimate, but, as with Harding, personal loyalty often

0:54:15.800 --> 0:54:21.600
<v Speaker 1>outruns public accountability. The language is even eerily familiar. Right efficiency,

0:54:21.960 --> 0:54:25.960
<v Speaker 1>cutting red tape, bringing business savvy to government. Harding used

0:54:25.960 --> 0:54:30.040
<v Speaker 1>that language, so does Trump. Albert Fall use those phrases

0:54:30.080 --> 0:54:36.320
<v Speaker 1>to justify bypassing the competitive bidding rules. Teapot Dome taught

0:54:36.320 --> 0:54:40.640
<v Speaker 1>Congress why oversight is not bureaucracy, it's protection. It birthed,

0:54:40.800 --> 0:54:44.280
<v Speaker 1>in fact, the modern system of inspectors general at different

0:54:44.280 --> 0:54:47.960
<v Speaker 1>cabinet agencies. We didn't have them before this financial disclosures

0:54:47.960 --> 0:54:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Senate investigations that still bear Washle's fingerprints, the Montana Senator.

0:54:53.080 --> 0:54:55.040
<v Speaker 1>But the guardrails only work if we use them, and

0:54:55.080 --> 0:55:01.160
<v Speaker 1>this Congress does no oversight. We've gone through this the politically,

0:55:01.480 --> 0:55:04.600
<v Speaker 1>we only will do Congress will only do oversight if

0:55:04.640 --> 0:55:07.320
<v Speaker 1>the president, and if Congress is controlled by a different

0:55:07.320 --> 0:55:10.240
<v Speaker 1>party than the president in the White House, it actually

0:55:10.280 --> 0:55:12.279
<v Speaker 1>probably we ought to change our oversight rules. I believe

0:55:12.360 --> 0:55:14.879
<v Speaker 1>Japan does it this way, where the out party should

0:55:14.880 --> 0:55:17.080
<v Speaker 1>always be in charge of oversight, just pure and simple.

0:55:18.080 --> 0:55:21.719
<v Speaker 1>You know, whatever party the president is the chairman of

0:55:21.719 --> 0:55:25.080
<v Speaker 1>the oversight committee with subpoena power ought to be ought

0:55:25.080 --> 0:55:29.560
<v Speaker 1>to be from the other party. But I digress. So

0:55:29.680 --> 0:55:32.520
<v Speaker 1>making government run like a business sounds good until the

0:55:32.560 --> 0:55:35.240
<v Speaker 1>business becomes self dealing. And that's what happened with Harding,

0:55:35.320 --> 0:55:37.800
<v Speaker 1>and that is a concern of what's happening today. Harding's

0:55:37.800 --> 0:55:39.719
<v Speaker 1>friends called him the most likable man alive, and that

0:55:39.840 --> 0:55:42.360
<v Speaker 1>was the problem. He couldn't say no to anyone he liked.

0:55:42.960 --> 0:55:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Sounds familiar, doesn't it? Today is the federal government signs

0:55:45.920 --> 0:55:48.600
<v Speaker 1>profit sharing deals with companies tied to the president's allies

0:55:48.800 --> 0:55:52.399
<v Speaker 1>and family network. The same question lingers that haunted Teapot don't.

0:55:52.920 --> 0:55:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Where does public service end and private profit begin? If

0:55:57.080 --> 0:55:59.320
<v Speaker 1>history has a lesson, it's this when secrecy and self

0:55:59.320 --> 0:56:05.120
<v Speaker 1>interest merge, the scandal isn't an accident, it's inevitable. So

0:56:05.200 --> 0:56:07.800
<v Speaker 1>before we all call every new venture a partnership, remember

0:56:07.800 --> 0:56:10.600
<v Speaker 1>what happened in October twenty fifth, nineteen twenty nine, when

0:56:10.680 --> 0:56:14.239
<v Speaker 1>Albert Fall traded the nation's trust for personal gain. And

0:56:14.280 --> 0:56:17.360
<v Speaker 1>he fell hard enough to give his name to history

0:56:17.440 --> 0:56:20.879
<v Speaker 1>on this one. So there's your history lesson for the day,

0:56:20.920 --> 0:56:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Teapot Dome. I'm telling you, folks, forget Watergate. Are you

0:56:25.160 --> 0:56:28.000
<v Speaker 1>looking for a parallel of an uncomfortable situation we're in

0:56:28.080 --> 0:56:32.880
<v Speaker 1>right now with the government's relationship with the tech industry.

0:56:33.160 --> 0:56:35.799
<v Speaker 1>Go back to the twenties, my friend, Go back to

0:56:35.880 --> 0:56:37.920
<v Speaker 1>the twenties. All right, with that, let's take a new

0:56:38.120 --> 0:56:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Let's do a couple of questions and I'll get in

0:56:40.040 --> 0:56:47.719
<v Speaker 1>quickly to my college football takes. Ask Chuck, I'm going

0:56:47.800 --> 0:56:49.200
<v Speaker 1>to do just a couple of questions because I went

0:56:49.239 --> 0:56:52.279
<v Speaker 1>a little bit long. Here's the first one, Rich from

0:56:52.320 --> 0:56:54.759
<v Speaker 1>New York. Hi, Chuck, love the show. Appreciate all you

0:56:54.880 --> 0:56:57.280
<v Speaker 1>do for all of us keeping a level head in politics.

0:56:57.320 --> 0:57:00.200
<v Speaker 1>On Saturday, I participated in the No Kings march. Had

0:57:00.200 --> 0:57:01.960
<v Speaker 1>great energy, but at a minimum made me feel like

0:57:02.000 --> 0:57:04.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm not crazy for my outrage other than my own

0:57:04.600 --> 0:57:06.880
<v Speaker 1>personal feelings. Does it have any impact on politics? It

0:57:06.920 --> 0:57:09.640
<v Speaker 1>seems to me these protests were large and blue northern

0:57:09.640 --> 0:57:13.120
<v Speaker 1>cities where the Trump administration has been hostile. Additionally, this

0:57:13.160 --> 0:57:15.040
<v Speaker 1>will have zero to no effect on Mike Johnson or

0:57:15.120 --> 0:57:17.800
<v Speaker 1>John Thune and it also won't have any real effects

0:57:17.840 --> 0:57:19.280
<v Speaker 1>on the midterms. Lay it to me straight, Did I

0:57:19.320 --> 0:57:24.200
<v Speaker 1>waste my Saturday or is there something accomplished from the protest? Thanks? Well, look,

0:57:24.400 --> 0:57:26.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious what you think of the what I said

0:57:26.920 --> 0:57:31.000
<v Speaker 1>the two measurables were measurables were of this? I do think, like,

0:57:31.080 --> 0:57:36.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, if Democrats overperform in Virginia in November, and

0:57:37.280 --> 0:57:40.200
<v Speaker 1>to me, overperform is you know, getting north of fifty

0:57:40.240 --> 0:57:43.560
<v Speaker 1>five state house seats, winning all three of the state

0:57:43.560 --> 0:57:47.080
<v Speaker 1>wide elections, even with an extraordinarily flawed, if not unqualified

0:57:47.120 --> 0:57:49.840
<v Speaker 1>candidate for attorney general. Well, I will tell you these

0:57:49.840 --> 0:57:55.640
<v Speaker 1>protests were certainly helped with political organizing. I think the

0:57:56.640 --> 0:58:01.480
<v Speaker 1>fact that the president expressed his feelings escally and there's

0:58:01.520 --> 0:58:06.240
<v Speaker 1>been this sort of demonization of Americans here. I think

0:58:06.360 --> 0:58:10.880
<v Speaker 1>that actually is going to have some legs that that

0:58:11.080 --> 0:58:18.600
<v Speaker 1>likely won't go well politically for the Republicans. But again,

0:58:19.680 --> 0:58:22.040
<v Speaker 1>you're not wrong for asking this question. It was the

0:58:22.120 --> 0:58:25.959
<v Speaker 1>question I essentially led the podcast with today to which

0:58:26.000 --> 0:58:28.040
<v Speaker 1>if you're listening all the way through, you you already

0:58:28.040 --> 0:58:32.960
<v Speaker 1>know this, But I will say this, be careful underestimating

0:58:32.960 --> 0:58:36.680
<v Speaker 1>the impact of these protests. I think it's quite remarkable

0:58:36.960 --> 0:58:39.520
<v Speaker 1>that where there was an incredibly nice day all over

0:58:39.520 --> 0:58:42.640
<v Speaker 1>the country in many places, well actually, unless you were

0:58:43.040 --> 0:58:44.920
<v Speaker 1>in Fayetteviell, Arkansas, where they had a two hour rain

0:58:44.960 --> 0:58:48.800
<v Speaker 1>delay for that football game, it was pretty nice day.

0:58:48.840 --> 0:58:51.560
<v Speaker 1>In a lot of these cities, there was plenty of

0:58:51.600 --> 0:58:59.320
<v Speaker 1>reasons to do other things. I think this, You know,

0:58:59.680 --> 0:59:04.320
<v Speaker 1>if if it's a trigger in political organization and voter registration,

0:59:05.400 --> 0:59:08.280
<v Speaker 1>then that's how you can call these effective. All right,

0:59:08.360 --> 0:59:10.960
<v Speaker 1>let me dig the next questionnaire. David from Baltimore. Since

0:59:11.000 --> 0:59:13.960
<v Speaker 1>most people assume that liberals control the mainstream media. While

0:59:13.960 --> 0:59:15.680
<v Speaker 1>there may be a moderate liberal slant in much of

0:59:15.680 --> 0:59:17.440
<v Speaker 1>the news, or at least in what's left of it,

0:59:17.680 --> 0:59:20.440
<v Speaker 1>I feel that MAGA actually dominates the talking points. Trump

0:59:20.480 --> 0:59:22.520
<v Speaker 1>in particular, has mastered the art of deflection when it

0:59:22.520 --> 0:59:25.960
<v Speaker 1>comes to media coverage. Simple remarks, some like suggesting he

0:59:26.040 --> 0:59:28.360
<v Speaker 1>might run again, end up distracting the public from issues

0:59:28.400 --> 0:59:31.520
<v Speaker 1>such as the legality of ice raids, military actions in Venezuela,

0:59:31.720 --> 0:59:34.360
<v Speaker 1>or the blatant corruption involving Trump and his family, all

0:59:34.360 --> 0:59:36.800
<v Speaker 1>three topics that I think we've already discussed in this

0:59:36.880 --> 0:59:41.120
<v Speaker 1>episode and didn't do too much on Ice. How can

0:59:41.160 --> 0:59:43.560
<v Speaker 1>democrats regain control of the narrative and keep public attention

0:59:43.640 --> 0:59:46.360
<v Speaker 1>focused on the issues that matter most, especially those that

0:59:46.400 --> 0:59:51.160
<v Speaker 1>could make a real difference in future elections. David from Baltimore. Look,

0:59:51.240 --> 0:59:54.360
<v Speaker 1>I do think you know it's funny. I do think

0:59:54.400 --> 0:59:58.480
<v Speaker 1>that all media consumption has a right lean right if

0:59:58.520 --> 1:00:01.640
<v Speaker 1>you look at the totality of social media, the totality

1:00:01.680 --> 1:00:06.680
<v Speaker 1>of if you put it all together, the ideological lean

1:00:07.160 --> 1:00:10.280
<v Speaker 1>and the sort of impact is on the right. Right,

1:00:10.680 --> 1:00:13.960
<v Speaker 1>there's definitely more on the right than on the left.

1:00:14.520 --> 1:00:18.760
<v Speaker 1>The right's a bit more comfortable, sort of sort of

1:00:18.840 --> 1:00:23.120
<v Speaker 1>rallying around one large talking point. The left is more diffuse. Right.

1:00:23.600 --> 1:00:26.680
<v Speaker 1>I think the fact is that Trump, the anti Trump

1:00:26.720 --> 1:00:29.800
<v Speaker 1>coalition does not have a lot in common other than

1:00:29.840 --> 1:00:34.200
<v Speaker 1>anti Trump, the pro Trump coalition has a ton in common.

1:00:34.240 --> 1:00:37.400
<v Speaker 1>They feel grievance and victimhood and all of this in

1:00:37.440 --> 1:00:40.120
<v Speaker 1>that sense, and that has fueled so right. Social media

1:00:40.920 --> 1:00:44.920
<v Speaker 1>really has proved to be an accelerant for victimhood and grievances,

1:00:45.480 --> 1:00:47.560
<v Speaker 1>and I think because of that it has allowed the

1:00:48.800 --> 1:00:53.560
<v Speaker 1>right to essentially control the narrative right. And that's essentially

1:00:53.600 --> 1:00:58.920
<v Speaker 1>what you're saying. Chris Hayes, an MSNBC host. He's written

1:00:59.080 --> 1:01:02.120
<v Speaker 1>he's written a pretty good interesting I've had today in

1:01:02.160 --> 1:01:04.160
<v Speaker 1>the Times that I would tell you to check it out.

1:01:04.400 --> 1:01:06.160
<v Speaker 1>And he's wrote a book about this issue of the

1:01:06.200 --> 1:01:12.920
<v Speaker 1>attention economy, and his essentially his answer to this question

1:01:13.000 --> 1:01:16.960
<v Speaker 1>is Democrats have to essentially do what they can to

1:01:17.080 --> 1:01:20.440
<v Speaker 1>dominate the attention economy, even if it's on issues that

1:01:20.520 --> 1:01:25.320
<v Speaker 1>have nothing to do with politics. That Donald Trump essentially

1:01:25.400 --> 1:01:27.760
<v Speaker 1>and it goes back to sort of a philosophy. He

1:01:27.800 --> 1:01:32.360
<v Speaker 1>would sort of adopt somebody else's grievance on anything. Almost

1:01:32.440 --> 1:01:35.360
<v Speaker 1>like that's sort of where this Maha movement. How did

1:01:35.400 --> 1:01:37.640
<v Speaker 1>it end up in the Maga movement? These are folks

1:01:37.680 --> 1:01:40.920
<v Speaker 1>who are pretty liberal on a lot of issues, but

1:01:41.080 --> 1:01:46.440
<v Speaker 1>they have sort of they have some antiquated views of science,

1:01:47.120 --> 1:01:51.320
<v Speaker 1>and they found their grievance partner in Donald Trump, right,

1:01:51.480 --> 1:01:57.439
<v Speaker 1>And so you know, I wonder if it's attitudinal right

1:01:57.520 --> 1:02:02.280
<v Speaker 1>that if the left wants to But I just you know,

1:02:02.920 --> 1:02:05.800
<v Speaker 1>I go back to something my mother said, why she's

1:02:05.800 --> 1:02:09.000
<v Speaker 1>a Democrat because she doesn't want to agree with everything

1:02:09.040 --> 1:02:13.880
<v Speaker 1>someone says. She views the Democratic Party is more diverse

1:02:14.040 --> 1:02:18.840
<v Speaker 1>on disagreeing with each other, more open to being although

1:02:18.880 --> 1:02:21.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that's less and less. I think there was

1:02:21.080 --> 1:02:24.280
<v Speaker 1>a time the Democratic Party was the bigger tent, and

1:02:24.400 --> 1:02:27.320
<v Speaker 1>now the Republican Party has become the bigger tent, or

1:02:27.360 --> 1:02:30.560
<v Speaker 1>the perceived bigger tent. And when you look at where

1:02:30.600 --> 1:02:33.080
<v Speaker 1>young men are, where this Maha movement is, there certainly

1:02:33.120 --> 1:02:36.720
<v Speaker 1>are in Latino voters. There's certainly some pieces there. There

1:02:36.760 --> 1:02:39.360
<v Speaker 1>seems to be more rules, you know, and that's where

1:02:40.720 --> 1:02:44.080
<v Speaker 1>if you're looking for add initudinal. The left seems to

1:02:44.120 --> 1:02:47.160
<v Speaker 1>have a bunch of rules that keep people from supporting them.

1:02:47.480 --> 1:02:49.680
<v Speaker 1>The right has no rules, but in a weird way,

1:02:50.120 --> 1:02:52.560
<v Speaker 1>it makes it a bit more inviting, or it feels

1:02:52.600 --> 1:02:54.720
<v Speaker 1>as if you can you're not going to get judged

1:02:54.760 --> 1:02:56.680
<v Speaker 1>if you decide you're going to support them on one

1:02:56.680 --> 1:03:03.600
<v Speaker 1>issue and none of the others. So that's basically where

1:03:03.600 --> 1:03:05.480
<v Speaker 1>I come out. I do think the point you make

1:03:05.520 --> 1:03:09.880
<v Speaker 1>those an important one, which is, let's not forget. Yes,

1:03:09.920 --> 1:03:13.920
<v Speaker 1>the New York Times may lean left, but overall most

1:03:14.960 --> 1:03:18.200
<v Speaker 1>the totality of media people consume it all leans right.

1:03:18.840 --> 1:03:22.360
<v Speaker 1>People are getting a right leaning media narrative on a

1:03:22.400 --> 1:03:27.360
<v Speaker 1>more consistent basis than anything being driven being driven by

1:03:27.360 --> 1:03:30.640
<v Speaker 1>the left, and that's born out by actual data. Right,

1:03:30.680 --> 1:03:33.440
<v Speaker 1>there's this perception you say something enough people believe it.

1:03:33.720 --> 1:03:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Media is liberal. Media is liberal. Media is liberal. Media

1:03:35.640 --> 1:03:39.280
<v Speaker 1>is liberal. The media is much bigger than what you know.

1:03:39.400 --> 1:03:41.920
<v Speaker 1>If you want to say Dan Rather was liberal, or

1:03:42.000 --> 1:03:43.400
<v Speaker 1>you want to say The New York Times was liberal,

1:03:43.480 --> 1:03:46.160
<v Speaker 1>or you want to say CNN or MEMBSBC, but it

1:03:46.280 --> 1:03:52.960
<v Speaker 1>is not the dominant to sort of. It may have

1:03:53.040 --> 1:03:57.120
<v Speaker 1>the more famous names that run those news organizations, but

1:03:57.200 --> 1:04:00.840
<v Speaker 1>it's not actually the dominant content that's out there. The

1:04:01.000 --> 1:04:06.480
<v Speaker 1>content of the Internet leans right. All right, let me

1:04:06.560 --> 1:04:12.520
<v Speaker 1>dig into my weekend from hell, the loss, the University

1:04:12.520 --> 1:04:17.640
<v Speaker 1>of Miami's loss. Now, look as I sort of as

1:04:17.680 --> 1:04:20.680
<v Speaker 1>I previewed, I said, this was Louisville's most important game

1:04:20.680 --> 1:04:23.080
<v Speaker 1>of the year. It always is. This is one of

1:04:23.080 --> 1:04:27.920
<v Speaker 1>those every every major football program has rivalries that they

1:04:27.960 --> 1:04:30.280
<v Speaker 1>don't care about as much as the other team cares about.

1:04:30.560 --> 1:04:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Right in the Big Ten, there's a ton of them. Right,

1:04:33.280 --> 1:04:36.479
<v Speaker 1>Michigan Minnesota. I think they do the Brown jug game.

1:04:36.640 --> 1:04:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Boyd does Minnesota care about that? Eh? Michigan Right, Michigan

1:04:40.040 --> 1:04:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Michigan State. Boy does Michigan State care about that game?

1:04:43.160 --> 1:04:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Michigan doesn't want to lose it. They hate when Little

1:04:46.160 --> 1:04:53.400
<v Speaker 1>Brother wins, but they care more about Ohio State for

1:04:53.560 --> 1:04:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Miami we care about. I care about the Florida State game,

1:04:57.840 --> 1:04:59.800
<v Speaker 1>and I think Florida State equally cares about the Miami

1:04:59.800 --> 1:05:01.480
<v Speaker 1>That's one of those where the rivalries. It's kind of

1:05:01.480 --> 1:05:04.120
<v Speaker 1>like Michigan iast day, but Florida doesn't care about the

1:05:04.120 --> 1:05:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Miami game as much as Miami cares about beating Florida.

1:05:08.080 --> 1:05:09.880
<v Speaker 1>I think there was a time Miami Notre Dame was

1:05:09.920 --> 1:05:13.000
<v Speaker 1>pretty equal, and maybe that comes back if they start

1:05:13.000 --> 1:05:15.400
<v Speaker 1>playing each other a tad more frequently because of this

1:05:15.480 --> 1:05:19.400
<v Speaker 1>acc rotation and because they're going to drop USC Miami

1:05:19.440 --> 1:05:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Notre Dame. I just you know, and you know, it's

1:05:22.520 --> 1:05:25.560
<v Speaker 1>a there is. It has just a little bit of everything,

1:05:25.880 --> 1:05:27.880
<v Speaker 1>but it is one of those Notre Dame fans care

1:05:27.920 --> 1:05:31.800
<v Speaker 1>about it. They don't like listen to Miami because of

1:05:32.400 --> 1:05:35.080
<v Speaker 1>those memories, at least at least there. But it's still

1:05:35.520 --> 1:05:37.640
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a point in time rivalry. So I don't

1:05:37.680 --> 1:05:40.560
<v Speaker 1>know they need to play more for it to come back.

1:05:40.840 --> 1:05:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Now Louisville and Miami are going to play more. It's

1:05:42.680 --> 1:05:44.560
<v Speaker 1>really important to Louisville to win this game, so they

1:05:44.600 --> 1:05:48.520
<v Speaker 1>put everything into it. You know, this isn't a game

1:05:48.560 --> 1:05:52.520
<v Speaker 1>where we can you know, there's been this assumption, and frankly,

1:05:52.520 --> 1:05:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Miami's done this for years. Even in their national title years,

1:05:55.400 --> 1:05:57.960
<v Speaker 1>there was always a game they almost blew out of nowhere.

1:05:58.440 --> 1:06:01.480
<v Speaker 1>I remember ed Reid saving a game against Boston College

1:06:01.720 --> 1:06:05.400
<v Speaker 1>in Boston College. We were playing terribly and Boston College

1:06:05.440 --> 1:06:06.960
<v Speaker 1>is about to go in for the winning touchdown and

1:06:07.000 --> 1:06:11.240
<v Speaker 1>he just grabs a ball. We get a turnover, and

1:06:11.280 --> 1:06:12.640
<v Speaker 1>then he grabs the ball and runs it in for

1:06:12.640 --> 1:06:15.480
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown and just puts the game away. But it

1:06:15.520 --> 1:06:17.680
<v Speaker 1>was like Edward wasn't going to let us lose. But

1:06:17.680 --> 1:06:19.520
<v Speaker 1>we almost blew a game that we had no I

1:06:19.520 --> 1:06:22.120
<v Speaker 1>think we were three or four touchdown favorites in that one.

1:06:22.800 --> 1:06:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Every year there's a game like this, there's been this reputation,

1:06:26.320 --> 1:06:28.600
<v Speaker 1>is Mario Christoval going to like, you know, screw up

1:06:29.120 --> 1:06:31.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, the clock management game or something like this,

1:06:31.800 --> 1:06:35.080
<v Speaker 1>like that infamous Georgia Tech game two years ago. There

1:06:35.120 --> 1:06:37.240
<v Speaker 1>was none of that there. This was Carson Beck trying

1:06:37.240 --> 1:06:40.640
<v Speaker 1>to be a hero. I saw a lot of Georgia

1:06:40.680 --> 1:06:43.840
<v Speaker 1>fans pop up in my feed to say, hey, we

1:06:43.880 --> 1:06:46.800
<v Speaker 1>know this version of Carson Beck. Look he did, he

1:06:46.840 --> 1:06:48.760
<v Speaker 1>tried to be a hero, and yet we still almost

1:06:48.800 --> 1:06:53.240
<v Speaker 1>won the game. So I'm weirdly I expected this or

1:06:53.320 --> 1:06:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Pitt to be the game that bit us Pitt is

1:06:56.040 --> 1:06:58.520
<v Speaker 1>our last game of the year, and that's that pit. Hopefully.

1:06:58.560 --> 1:07:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Now this means we are super focused in every game

1:07:02.800 --> 1:07:05.240
<v Speaker 1>and we look they scored. When you look at what

1:07:05.240 --> 1:07:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Louisville had to do, they used every They literally created

1:07:07.920 --> 1:07:11.920
<v Speaker 1>an entirely new first drive game plan. They got their touchdown.

1:07:12.200 --> 1:07:14.080
<v Speaker 1>They never ran any of those plays again because you

1:07:14.160 --> 1:07:17.040
<v Speaker 1>only can really run them once, and they essentially they

1:07:17.080 --> 1:07:21.640
<v Speaker 1>scored quickly fourteen points and then and then Miami won

1:07:21.680 --> 1:07:25.240
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the game twenty one to ten. But

1:07:25.280 --> 1:07:28.680
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't enough. Fourtune nerves are going to do that,

1:07:29.640 --> 1:07:35.120
<v Speaker 1>pure and simple. So I'm disappointed, sadly a little not surprised.

1:07:35.160 --> 1:07:39.280
<v Speaker 1>I hate these Friday Island games. They suck, all right,

1:07:39.600 --> 1:07:42.919
<v Speaker 1>they simply suck. So what does that tell us about

1:07:42.920 --> 1:07:47.160
<v Speaker 1>college foot? Look, I I think it's still possible that everybody,

1:07:47.520 --> 1:07:53.680
<v Speaker 1>everybody in the playoff will have one loss. That's that's

1:07:53.720 --> 1:07:58.720
<v Speaker 1>my bold, hot take prediction. Everybody in the playoff will

1:07:58.760 --> 1:08:01.400
<v Speaker 1>have at least one law us. Now, of course, the

1:08:01.480 --> 1:08:06.120
<v Speaker 1>question is who beats Ohio State. Well won't be Penn

1:08:06.200 --> 1:08:10.400
<v Speaker 1>State in two weeks, that, I promise you. But UCLA

1:08:10.520 --> 1:08:13.680
<v Speaker 1>goes to Ohio State, are you betting against I bet.

1:08:13.720 --> 1:08:16.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm certainly not gonna bet on UCLA winning that game,

1:08:16.120 --> 1:08:17.960
<v Speaker 1>but I bet you that's close. They play Michigan and

1:08:17.960 --> 1:08:19.960
<v Speaker 1>then I'll have the Big ten title game. I think

1:08:20.000 --> 1:08:22.360
<v Speaker 1>they have three games on their schedule that there are

1:08:22.840 --> 1:08:24.960
<v Speaker 1>that they need to be a little bit concerned about

1:08:25.360 --> 1:08:29.120
<v Speaker 1>the UCLA game, the Michigan game, which will be at Michigan,

1:08:30.000 --> 1:08:32.559
<v Speaker 1>and then of course the likely title game against Indiana.

1:08:34.040 --> 1:08:38.000
<v Speaker 1>The potential for them to have one loss is certainly there.

1:08:39.120 --> 1:08:43.040
<v Speaker 1>How about Indiana, where would they get their one loss? Well,

1:08:43.160 --> 1:08:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Indiana has remaining. I think we're all curious ab how

1:08:49.280 --> 1:08:52.200
<v Speaker 1>UCLA does against You know, the UCLA is a totally

1:08:52.200 --> 1:08:57.280
<v Speaker 1>different team now, right, they should be fine at Maryland

1:08:57.280 --> 1:08:59.360
<v Speaker 1>and at Penn State, But aren't you kind of curious

1:08:59.400 --> 1:09:01.960
<v Speaker 1>to see how those road games go. Indiana is different

1:09:01.960 --> 1:09:04.400
<v Speaker 1>on the road. They almost they should have lost Iowa.

1:09:04.560 --> 1:09:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Maybe that's the game that will be the one that

1:09:06.920 --> 1:09:08.679
<v Speaker 1>they should have lost, and there'll be none on others.

1:09:09.560 --> 1:09:11.360
<v Speaker 1>And don't sleep on their last game of the season

1:09:11.360 --> 1:09:15.280
<v Speaker 1>against Purdue. It's at Purdue, right and these in state

1:09:15.360 --> 1:09:18.200
<v Speaker 1>rivalries throw the records out. Then of course there's a

1:09:18.200 --> 1:09:21.080
<v Speaker 1>big Ten title game Texas, A and m that's the

1:09:21.120 --> 1:09:23.120
<v Speaker 1>other big undefeated that's left. I think, what do we

1:09:23.160 --> 1:09:25.400
<v Speaker 1>have left in the undefeated? That's it? Really. I think

1:09:25.439 --> 1:09:28.559
<v Speaker 1>that's the major undefeateds that could be in the playoff

1:09:29.160 --> 1:09:31.439
<v Speaker 1>A and M I think I said told you they

1:09:31.479 --> 1:09:33.439
<v Speaker 1>would get a scare in this one. They have LSU

1:09:33.520 --> 1:09:36.479
<v Speaker 1>next week. Although this feels like we're gonna find out

1:09:36.520 --> 1:09:38.719
<v Speaker 1>everything we need to know about Brian Kelly. Billy Napier

1:09:38.800 --> 1:09:41.760
<v Speaker 1>was the firing so far. I boa is LSU gonna

1:09:41.760 --> 1:09:44.519
<v Speaker 1>also have an open I mean, my god, the level

1:09:44.520 --> 1:09:46.479
<v Speaker 1>of jobs out there, I mean, what the hell is

1:09:46.560 --> 1:09:49.839
<v Speaker 1>Virginia Tech gonna do? Right? They're behind Penn State, They're

1:09:49.880 --> 1:09:55.479
<v Speaker 1>behind Florida, now behind UCLA. Does LSU change? Arkansas already

1:09:55.479 --> 1:09:58.960
<v Speaker 1>has big money that they're throwing at their potential coaching opening.

1:09:59.439 --> 1:10:04.519
<v Speaker 1>So next week LSU loses, Kelly gets fired. That's because

1:10:04.560 --> 1:10:07.400
<v Speaker 1>the game's at LSU. We're going to find out how

1:10:07.439 --> 1:10:10.400
<v Speaker 1>much this team likes Brian Kelly. Will they rally for him?

1:10:10.720 --> 1:10:14.200
<v Speaker 1>It's a huge game, and then plays at Missouri, And

1:10:14.280 --> 1:10:16.559
<v Speaker 1>of course they have the big game against Texas at

1:10:16.600 --> 1:10:19.160
<v Speaker 1>the end of the season. So there's certainly plenty of

1:10:19.200 --> 1:10:22.280
<v Speaker 1>ways that they that they are likely to go down.

1:10:22.360 --> 1:10:26.120
<v Speaker 1>So the likelihood that everybody has one loss, right, b

1:10:26.280 --> 1:10:30.400
<v Speaker 1>YU still undefeated. I doubt they finish their season undefeated.

1:10:30.640 --> 1:10:33.840
<v Speaker 1>It's just unlikely that's going to happen Georgia Tech's undefeated.

1:10:33.960 --> 1:10:36.160
<v Speaker 1>That's another one. They got. Georgia left on their schedule,

1:10:36.479 --> 1:10:38.400
<v Speaker 1>and they're going to face a Miami or a Louisville

1:10:38.439 --> 1:10:41.200
<v Speaker 1>or somebody like that in the in the ACC title game.

1:10:42.120 --> 1:10:45.439
<v Speaker 1>So just consider that. Maybe I'm just saying that it

1:10:45.479 --> 1:10:48.360
<v Speaker 1>make myself feel better about Miami. There's a tiny bit

1:10:48.400 --> 1:10:51.680
<v Speaker 1>of that in me. I'm not gonna lie, but it's

1:10:51.720 --> 1:10:54.960
<v Speaker 1>also the way this college football season's going. I think

1:10:55.040 --> 1:10:57.519
<v Speaker 1>if you could find a bet out there that say

1:10:57.560 --> 1:11:01.200
<v Speaker 1>there'll be no undefeated team in the playoff wick. I

1:11:01.240 --> 1:11:04.880
<v Speaker 1>have no idea whether Fandel, DraftKings, bet MGM, whoever wants

1:11:04.920 --> 1:11:08.040
<v Speaker 1>to sponsor my little segment here. They're welcome to sponsor it.

1:11:08.120 --> 1:11:11.200
<v Speaker 1>So we'll only pick one of you. But that would

1:11:11.240 --> 1:11:14.720
<v Speaker 1>be a fun bet to lay that no undefeated team

1:11:14.760 --> 1:11:20.080
<v Speaker 1>will be invited to the claff mark it down. That's

1:11:20.080 --> 1:11:22.960
<v Speaker 1>my prediction. All right? With that, I will see in

1:11:23.000 --> 1:11:26.400
<v Speaker 1>forty eight hours. Thanks for investing some time in the show.

1:11:26.479 --> 1:11:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Appreciate your support, Appreciate your listenership. Thank you for all

1:11:30.120 --> 1:11:34.680
<v Speaker 1>those likes. Tell your friends more subscriptions. We appreciate it.

1:11:34.960 --> 1:11:36.400
<v Speaker 1>See in forty eight hours.