WEBVTT - From the Vault: The Remarkable Beaver, Part 1

0:00:06.320 --> 0:00:08.800
<v Speaker 1>Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind. My name

0:00:08.880 --> 0:00:09.440
<v Speaker 1>is Robert.

0:00:09.280 --> 0:00:12.400
<v Speaker 2>Lamb and I am Joe McCormick. And it's Saturday, so

0:00:12.480 --> 0:00:14.720
<v Speaker 2>we're going into the vault for an older episode of

0:00:14.720 --> 0:00:18.040
<v Speaker 2>Stuff to Blow Your Mind. This one originally published May eighteenth,

0:00:18.120 --> 0:00:21.480
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty three, and it is part one of our

0:00:21.520 --> 0:00:26.119
<v Speaker 2>series on the beaver, a truly remarkable animal, far more

0:00:26.160 --> 0:00:28.400
<v Speaker 2>strange and amazing than you might imagine.

0:00:28.560 --> 0:00:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so have you skipped it the first time around,

0:00:30.840 --> 0:00:33.199
<v Speaker 1>thinking I don't want to hear about beavers. Beavers are boring. Well,

0:00:33.200 --> 0:00:37.080
<v Speaker 1>you were wrong. Beavers are exciting and allow us to

0:00:37.360 --> 0:00:40.640
<v Speaker 1>prove this to you in this episode and the following.

0:00:43.520 --> 0:00:47.519
<v Speaker 3>Welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind, a production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:53.600 --> 0:00:56.360
<v Speaker 1>Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind. My name

0:00:56.480 --> 0:01:00.639
<v Speaker 1>is Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick. We've covered numerous

0:01:00.720 --> 0:01:05.080
<v Speaker 1>examples of this before, but obviously, in days before photography

0:01:05.280 --> 0:01:10.040
<v Speaker 1>and videography, one had to depend on illustrations and written

0:01:10.080 --> 0:01:14.080
<v Speaker 1>descriptions to convey the reality of an organism, you know,

0:01:14.200 --> 0:01:17.959
<v Speaker 1>be it a bird or a fish, what have you.

0:01:18.720 --> 0:01:21.840
<v Speaker 1>But this is especially true for creatures that lived in

0:01:21.959 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 1>lands beyond your direct experience. You know, what are the

0:01:26.319 --> 0:01:29.319
<v Speaker 1>what are the mammals, what are the birds? Like on

0:01:29.440 --> 0:01:31.440
<v Speaker 1>another continent. Well, you have to send people out in

0:01:31.440 --> 0:01:32.760
<v Speaker 1>the world. They can, you know, to a certain extent.

0:01:32.800 --> 0:01:35.280
<v Speaker 1>They can bring specimens back. Certainly, they can bring parts

0:01:35.280 --> 0:01:39.080
<v Speaker 1>of specimens back, but it's those ill in some cases,

0:01:39.880 --> 0:01:44.560
<v Speaker 1>but it's those illustrations that really bring things alive. Now,

0:01:44.920 --> 0:01:48.000
<v Speaker 1>certainly there are some fine examples of naturalist illustration out there,

0:01:48.080 --> 0:01:51.640
<v Speaker 1>especially from recent centuries. I mean there's some gorgeous, like

0:01:51.680 --> 0:01:55.000
<v Speaker 1>you say, like Audubond illustrations and paintings that sort of thing.

0:01:55.520 --> 0:01:58.320
<v Speaker 1>But there are also countless examples, and we've touched on

0:01:58.360 --> 0:02:02.760
<v Speaker 1>these before in the show of rough or drawings, drawings

0:02:02.760 --> 0:02:04.280
<v Speaker 1>that feel like, you know, there's been a game of

0:02:04.280 --> 0:02:08.720
<v Speaker 1>telephone at play. And this is especially the case for

0:02:08.800 --> 0:02:13.960
<v Speaker 1>examples found in various bestiaries and medieval manuscripts, among other places.

0:02:14.440 --> 0:02:18.320
<v Speaker 1>And when we think of such misconstrued animals, you know,

0:02:18.320 --> 0:02:19.800
<v Speaker 1>what do we tend to think about? You know, we

0:02:19.840 --> 0:02:24.000
<v Speaker 1>think about the rhino, We think about the lion, the whale,

0:02:24.120 --> 0:02:28.600
<v Speaker 1>the elephant, you know, great animals, apex, predators, and megafauna.

0:02:29.040 --> 0:02:31.400
<v Speaker 1>But in this episode, in the next episode, at the

0:02:31.480 --> 0:02:34.320
<v Speaker 1>very least, we're going to get into another creature that

0:02:34.360 --> 0:02:39.800
<v Speaker 1>has also experienced extreme inaccuracy in historic illustration, and that

0:02:40.000 --> 0:02:43.640
<v Speaker 1>is the common beaver. Based on just some of the

0:02:43.680 --> 0:02:47.120
<v Speaker 1>images we've been looking at, a beaver might well be

0:02:47.560 --> 0:02:50.079
<v Speaker 1>a kind of strange dog or a pig with a

0:02:50.440 --> 0:02:53.040
<v Speaker 1>with perhaps a fish tail on its body, you know,

0:02:53.080 --> 0:02:56.200
<v Speaker 1>a real hybrid feeling like it is, almost like it's

0:02:56.240 --> 0:03:02.200
<v Speaker 1>a strange like dog mermaid. It might be in almost

0:03:02.240 --> 0:03:06.360
<v Speaker 1>all respects a deer, like a creature with long legs

0:03:06.400 --> 0:03:11.359
<v Speaker 1>and hooves. And it may also look like a strange

0:03:11.360 --> 0:03:15.519
<v Speaker 1>and confused rodent with a great button seam running down

0:03:15.560 --> 0:03:19.880
<v Speaker 1>its chest. It may even look like a weirdly serpentine lion.

0:03:20.520 --> 0:03:25.560
<v Speaker 2>So Rob has been sharing medieval and Renaissance illustrations of

0:03:25.560 --> 0:03:29.320
<v Speaker 2>beavers with me for a couple of days now, and

0:03:29.639 --> 0:03:31.640
<v Speaker 2>I really do love all of them. But I do

0:03:31.680 --> 0:03:33.480
<v Speaker 2>think the one I like the most is the one

0:03:33.480 --> 0:03:37.080
<v Speaker 2>that's just straight up a deer with hooves, except it

0:03:37.160 --> 0:03:41.160
<v Speaker 2>has razor blades for teeth, just like the rectangular razor blades.

0:03:41.720 --> 0:03:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, this one. I had to go deep around

0:03:43.560 --> 0:03:46.080
<v Speaker 1>this one because I was It initially came up in

0:03:46.120 --> 0:03:48.280
<v Speaker 1>an image search and you know, I think it was

0:03:48.280 --> 0:03:50.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe on a pinterest or something. I was like, I

0:03:50.080 --> 0:03:52.520
<v Speaker 1>can't trust this. But I eventually looked it up in

0:03:52.600 --> 0:03:58.000
<v Speaker 1>the catalog of illuminated manuscripts and it is a Northern

0:03:58.080 --> 0:04:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Italian illustration from somewhere around the year fourteen forty. And yeah,

0:04:04.480 --> 0:04:07.320
<v Speaker 1>it just looks like a It is labeled as a beaver,

0:04:07.720 --> 0:04:10.320
<v Speaker 1>but it is in all respects a deer. So I

0:04:10.400 --> 0:04:13.720
<v Speaker 1>was just really astounded, like here, especially as an image,

0:04:14.120 --> 0:04:18.960
<v Speaker 1>that it not only gets the form wrong regarding the

0:04:19.040 --> 0:04:22.080
<v Speaker 1>target organism, it gets everything about like the energy of

0:04:22.120 --> 0:04:24.280
<v Speaker 1>the creature wrong, you know, because it's it's one thing

0:04:24.279 --> 0:04:26.120
<v Speaker 1>if you have a depiction of a rhino that okay,

0:04:26.160 --> 0:04:28.599
<v Speaker 1>it's like a big armor plated thing with four legs.

0:04:28.640 --> 0:04:31.080
<v Speaker 1>It's like, all right, I mean that's it's an extravagant

0:04:31.160 --> 0:04:35.119
<v Speaker 1>version of the truth. But this, it's like, how wrong

0:04:35.240 --> 0:04:36.560
<v Speaker 1>did this game of telephone go?

0:04:37.160 --> 0:04:40.640
<v Speaker 2>Right? With the right? You like, with deerors rhinoceros, you

0:04:40.680 --> 0:04:45.279
<v Speaker 2>can see that beginning as a rhinoceros, but with embellishments, yes,

0:04:45.760 --> 0:04:48.000
<v Speaker 2>But with the beaver, it's like, oh, I'm sorry, did

0:04:48.000 --> 0:04:50.640
<v Speaker 2>you say beaver? I thought you asked for a depiction

0:04:50.839 --> 0:04:53.400
<v Speaker 2>of a of a lion with a snake neck biting

0:04:53.440 --> 0:04:54.360
<v Speaker 2>its own genitals.

0:04:54.920 --> 0:04:57.040
<v Speaker 1>That's right, because and this is this is something we'll

0:04:57.040 --> 0:05:00.200
<v Speaker 1>probably get into mostly in the next episode, But there

0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:04.760
<v Speaker 1>is this pervasive myth that existed for a very long

0:05:04.800 --> 0:05:07.920
<v Speaker 1>time that when pursued by hunters, a male beaver would

0:05:07.960 --> 0:05:10.360
<v Speaker 1>chew off its own testicles. And so many of these images.

0:05:10.800 --> 0:05:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Be your creature more dog or catlike, or or actually

0:05:14.880 --> 0:05:17.240
<v Speaker 1>just a deer with razor sharp teeth, it is often

0:05:17.279 --> 0:05:21.599
<v Speaker 1>depicted nine at its testicles. That at least we have

0:05:21.720 --> 0:05:24.400
<v Speaker 1>some answers for in the next episode where that idea

0:05:24.480 --> 0:05:26.800
<v Speaker 1>comes from and why it's so pervasive.

0:05:26.760 --> 0:05:28.479
<v Speaker 2>Right, So you've got to stick around for next time

0:05:28.520 --> 0:05:28.960
<v Speaker 2>to hear that.

0:05:29.680 --> 0:05:33.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so let's start with what we know. Let's start

0:05:33.440 --> 0:05:36.000
<v Speaker 1>with the reality. We're gonna start by talking about just

0:05:36.080 --> 0:05:40.000
<v Speaker 1>basic beaver anatomy and behavior. And I probably don't have

0:05:40.080 --> 0:05:43.000
<v Speaker 1>to tell most listeners out there what a beaver looks like.

0:05:43.120 --> 0:05:46.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, for starters, like, we have images all over

0:05:46.520 --> 0:05:49.520
<v Speaker 1>the place of them, we have documentary footage. Many of

0:05:49.560 --> 0:05:53.440
<v Speaker 1>you can go and see a live beaver at least

0:05:53.440 --> 0:05:56.120
<v Speaker 1>in some sort of like a zoo environment, or you

0:05:56.200 --> 0:05:58.520
<v Speaker 1>have seen them in the past. But on the other

0:05:58.600 --> 0:06:00.599
<v Speaker 1>side of the coin, it's, like I said, still kind

0:06:00.600 --> 0:06:02.320
<v Speaker 1>of have to tell you what a beaver looks like

0:06:02.839 --> 0:06:05.080
<v Speaker 1>because the beaver is kind of in the same category

0:06:05.120 --> 0:06:07.680
<v Speaker 1>as the spouting whale, as we discussed in some of

0:06:07.720 --> 0:06:10.599
<v Speaker 1>our recent whale episodes, those particularly the ones on spouting

0:06:10.640 --> 0:06:16.960
<v Speaker 1>and spouts. Because despite all this access to actual, solid

0:06:17.000 --> 0:06:20.080
<v Speaker 1>documentary footage of the beaver, we still have this rich

0:06:20.160 --> 0:06:23.479
<v Speaker 1>history of cartoon depictions of beavers that inevitably cloud our

0:06:23.560 --> 0:06:24.840
<v Speaker 1>understanding of the creatures.

0:06:25.120 --> 0:06:27.200
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I think you get a fairly accurate mental

0:06:27.240 --> 0:06:30.560
<v Speaker 2>picture if you just cross a squirrel with a grizzly bear.

0:06:31.040 --> 0:06:34.080
<v Speaker 2>You know, you mash those two up your most of

0:06:34.120 --> 0:06:36.320
<v Speaker 2>the way there. But while that does get you sort

0:06:36.360 --> 0:06:39.880
<v Speaker 2>of the shape the outline, right, that does not tell

0:06:39.880 --> 0:06:42.080
<v Speaker 2>you everything you need to know about beavers. Beavers are

0:06:42.240 --> 0:06:46.680
<v Speaker 2>much stranger and more beautiful than I realized.

0:06:47.240 --> 0:06:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah, there's a lot of weird and wonderful aspects

0:06:51.080 --> 0:06:55.200
<v Speaker 1>to their morphology, to their behavior, and a lot of

0:06:55.240 --> 0:06:57.880
<v Speaker 1>this is stuff that our popular conceptions of the beaver

0:06:58.600 --> 0:07:00.680
<v Speaker 1>don't get into. I mean, you know, they do get

0:07:00.680 --> 0:07:02.520
<v Speaker 1>some of the things right, you know, the basic shape

0:07:02.560 --> 0:07:04.760
<v Speaker 1>of the beaver is far better in cartoon than it

0:07:04.839 --> 0:07:07.840
<v Speaker 1>is in many of these eliminated manuscripts. You know, some

0:07:07.920 --> 0:07:10.240
<v Speaker 1>things hold up. Obviously, beavers are not going to sell

0:07:10.280 --> 0:07:12.960
<v Speaker 1>you out to the White Witch. That's absolutely true.

0:07:13.680 --> 0:07:14.200
<v Speaker 2>So C. S.

0:07:14.280 --> 0:07:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Lewis was right on that count, even if he got

0:07:16.120 --> 0:07:19.840
<v Speaker 1>the whole diet of the beaver wrong, because in Narnia,

0:07:19.920 --> 0:07:22.920
<v Speaker 1>apparently beavers like to eat fish and chips. That's not

0:07:23.040 --> 0:07:26.400
<v Speaker 1>happening in the actual natural world.

0:07:27.000 --> 0:07:29.040
<v Speaker 2>On the other hand, I will say, there is the

0:07:29.160 --> 0:07:31.800
<v Speaker 2>kind of food and organism usually seeks out to eat

0:07:31.840 --> 0:07:35.320
<v Speaker 2>in its environment, versus what an animal will eat if

0:07:35.360 --> 0:07:37.720
<v Speaker 2>given the opportunity. I kind of wonder. I feel like

0:07:37.720 --> 0:07:41.280
<v Speaker 2>if you gave a beaver a basket of chips and

0:07:41.280 --> 0:07:43.360
<v Speaker 2>some malt vinegar, I don't know they might get into that.

0:07:44.280 --> 0:07:46.240
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, let's start with the basics here. So

0:07:46.320 --> 0:07:50.280
<v Speaker 1>beavers are rodents, and are in fact the second largest

0:07:50.320 --> 0:07:55.240
<v Speaker 1>extent rodent, surpassed only by the mighty capybara. Beavers can

0:07:55.280 --> 0:07:58.720
<v Speaker 1>weigh up to fifty kilograms or one hundred and ten pounds.

0:07:59.280 --> 0:08:01.920
<v Speaker 1>There are two extant species of beaver. There's the North

0:08:01.960 --> 0:08:07.480
<v Speaker 1>American beaver or castor canadensis and the Eurasian beaver caste

0:08:07.600 --> 0:08:13.760
<v Speaker 1>or fiber. But the Castoridae family includes some impressive extinct

0:08:13.880 --> 0:08:17.240
<v Speaker 1>species as well. In fact, there were giant beavers that

0:08:17.320 --> 0:08:21.400
<v Speaker 1>lived during the Pleistocene, reaching weights of up to one

0:08:21.440 --> 0:08:24.000
<v Speaker 1>hundred and twenty five kilograms or two hundred and seventy

0:08:24.040 --> 0:08:27.120
<v Speaker 1>six pounds, So that is more than twice as big

0:08:27.480 --> 0:08:31.000
<v Speaker 1>as extant beavers. Though I was reading they seem to

0:08:31.040 --> 0:08:35.640
<v Speaker 1>have had smaller brains, among other morphological differences. But yeah,

0:08:35.679 --> 0:08:38.760
<v Speaker 1>so they were bigger, and you know, maybe to some

0:08:38.800 --> 0:08:41.439
<v Speaker 1>extent they didn't have to or had not yet developed

0:08:41.960 --> 0:08:45.720
<v Speaker 1>these very impressive behaviors and abilities that we'll get into

0:08:45.720 --> 0:08:49.080
<v Speaker 1>concerning modern beavers. Now, one note on these guys. They

0:08:49.080 --> 0:08:53.000
<v Speaker 1>were still smaller than the fifteen hundred kilogram or thirty

0:08:53.040 --> 0:08:58.679
<v Speaker 1>three hundred pound giant pacaranas of South America. Extant pacaranas

0:08:58.880 --> 0:09:01.680
<v Speaker 1>only get up to light thirty three pounds or fifteen kilograms,

0:09:01.800 --> 0:09:03.920
<v Speaker 1>and they can still be found in the western Amazonian

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:08.280
<v Speaker 1>River basin. But the giant ones, they were pretty massive.

0:09:08.640 --> 0:09:12.680
<v Speaker 1>A lot of rodents of unusual size in freehistory, all.

0:09:12.640 --> 0:09:15.600
<v Speaker 2>Right, So no beavers today in that territory, but beavers

0:09:15.600 --> 0:09:16.800
<v Speaker 2>can still get pretty chunky.

0:09:17.360 --> 0:09:19.960
<v Speaker 1>That's right. Yeah, they're pretty big, And this is like

0:09:19.960 --> 0:09:24.080
<v Speaker 1>a fact. I frequently forget that they're the second biggest rodent.

0:09:24.360 --> 0:09:26.360
<v Speaker 1>The kappy bear is easy to remember, but it's sometimes

0:09:26.400 --> 0:09:28.679
<v Speaker 1>it's easy to forget who's coming in second. Now, it's

0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:33.240
<v Speaker 1>extremely important to note that beavers are semi aquatic, having

0:09:33.240 --> 0:09:37.480
<v Speaker 1>evolved to thrive in various freshwater habitats, so a number

0:09:37.520 --> 0:09:39.560
<v Speaker 1>of the things we're going to be discussing about them

0:09:40.240 --> 0:09:43.280
<v Speaker 1>line up with their habitat. For instance, they can hold

0:09:43.280 --> 0:09:47.840
<v Speaker 1>their breath for fifteen minutes. They have transparent third eyelids

0:09:47.920 --> 0:09:51.520
<v Speaker 1>called nicitating membranes to aid them in their swims, much

0:09:51.600 --> 0:09:56.520
<v Speaker 1>like manatees. They also famously have long, flat black tails.

0:09:56.559 --> 0:09:59.560
<v Speaker 1>We know this from the cartoons obviously, and these aid

0:09:59.559 --> 0:10:02.480
<v Speaker 1>them in their swimming, but they can also use them

0:10:02.520 --> 0:10:05.360
<v Speaker 1>to sound an alarm by slapping the water slapping the

0:10:05.360 --> 0:10:07.960
<v Speaker 1>surface of the water, and they also use them to

0:10:08.080 --> 0:10:12.120
<v Speaker 1>balance when they're carrying wood or other loads across the ground.

0:10:13.160 --> 0:10:15.120
<v Speaker 1>For any of you out there who watch a lot

0:10:15.120 --> 0:10:18.079
<v Speaker 1>of animal videos on Instagram and so forth, you may

0:10:18.080 --> 0:10:23.520
<v Speaker 1>have seen videos of adorable beavers carrying carrots around and

0:10:23.840 --> 0:10:26.240
<v Speaker 1>if you're not looking closely enough, you might think they're

0:10:26.320 --> 0:10:29.240
<v Speaker 1>dragging their tails, But if you will look closely, you

0:10:29.280 --> 0:10:32.360
<v Speaker 1>can see that the tail is off the ground and

0:10:32.400 --> 0:10:33.520
<v Speaker 1>it's helping them balance.

0:10:34.080 --> 0:10:36.320
<v Speaker 2>One of the things I've noticed about watching beavers try

0:10:36.360 --> 0:10:39.480
<v Speaker 2>to move objects around is how much more gracefully they

0:10:39.480 --> 0:10:41.440
<v Speaker 2>do it in the water than on the land. So

0:10:41.480 --> 0:10:44.800
<v Speaker 2>these are semi aquatic mammals, but I don't know, it

0:10:44.800 --> 0:10:47.480
<v Speaker 2>seems to me that the water is where they're really

0:10:47.520 --> 0:10:50.760
<v Speaker 2>in their element. They can swim fast and gracefully, even

0:10:50.840 --> 0:10:55.320
<v Speaker 2>carrying like an unwieldy branch that's kind of unbalanced or something.

0:10:56.000 --> 0:10:57.800
<v Speaker 2>They do that all quite well in the water, and

0:10:57.840 --> 0:11:01.040
<v Speaker 2>then once you see them sort of toddling along across

0:11:01.080 --> 0:11:04.400
<v Speaker 2>the dry land that it looks much more comical and awkward.

0:11:05.160 --> 0:11:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and this is going to be important to keep

0:11:06.800 --> 0:11:09.440
<v Speaker 1>in mind when we talk about the amazing ways that

0:11:09.480 --> 0:11:14.400
<v Speaker 1>they transform an environment to better fit their needs and desires.

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:16.720
<v Speaker 1>Oh but before we get into that, we of course

0:11:16.800 --> 0:11:18.920
<v Speaker 1>have to talk about the teeth of the beaver. This

0:11:19.040 --> 0:11:23.760
<v Speaker 1>is something that is generally an important part of cartoon

0:11:23.800 --> 0:11:27.240
<v Speaker 1>imagery concerning the beaver. A lot of times cartoon beavers

0:11:27.280 --> 0:11:30.120
<v Speaker 1>will speak with a kind of whistle in their voice.

0:11:30.679 --> 0:11:32.360
<v Speaker 1>But we also tend to get it quite wrong.

0:11:32.679 --> 0:11:34.800
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so I'm trying to picture the cartoon beaver. I

0:11:34.880 --> 0:11:38.120
<v Speaker 2>think what we always see is an overbite with two

0:11:38.320 --> 0:11:41.520
<v Speaker 2>kind of square shaped teeth grouped right together in the middle,

0:11:41.600 --> 0:11:46.080
<v Speaker 2>like a person's front two teeth, but large and overlapping

0:11:46.120 --> 0:11:47.880
<v Speaker 2>the bottom lip. Is that about it?

0:11:48.360 --> 0:11:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? Yeah, pretty much.

0:11:49.960 --> 0:11:51.560
<v Speaker 2>The truth is much more shocking.

0:11:52.920 --> 0:11:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, they have these. You know, if you look

0:11:58.000 --> 0:12:01.080
<v Speaker 1>at a skull of a beaver, it's pretty markable because

0:12:01.360 --> 0:12:05.160
<v Speaker 1>it's like this, the really kind of exaggerated rodent skull

0:12:05.960 --> 0:12:09.520
<v Speaker 1>with just incredible incisors, you know, with these these two

0:12:09.520 --> 0:12:12.440
<v Speaker 1>big shovel like teeth coming down from the top, two

0:12:12.480 --> 0:12:15.800
<v Speaker 1>big shovel like teeth coming up from the bottom, and

0:12:15.800 --> 0:12:18.640
<v Speaker 1>then the rest of the the back teeth or much

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:21.640
<v Speaker 1>further back, you know, giving them some ample room to

0:12:21.720 --> 0:12:24.200
<v Speaker 1>do the kind of woodwork that they need to do

0:12:24.600 --> 0:12:25.559
<v Speaker 1>with those chompers.

0:12:26.200 --> 0:12:29.840
<v Speaker 2>The skull is a powerful bone hinge, and it's like

0:12:30.000 --> 0:12:35.240
<v Speaker 2>it's like a kind of alien biotechnological set of bolt cutters,

0:12:35.280 --> 0:12:37.720
<v Speaker 2>except the bolt cutters are orange teeth.

0:12:38.440 --> 0:12:40.319
<v Speaker 1>That's right, The orange is key. This is something I

0:12:40.400 --> 0:12:43.439
<v Speaker 1>almost never see in like a cute c illustration or

0:12:43.480 --> 0:12:47.800
<v Speaker 1>a cartoon depiction of a beaver. So, yeah, these teeth

0:12:47.840 --> 0:12:51.520
<v Speaker 1>have thick layers of enamel, which has this orange colorization

0:12:51.760 --> 0:12:56.200
<v Speaker 1>because while other rodents boast magnesium enriched tooth enamel, beavers

0:12:56.240 --> 0:12:59.760
<v Speaker 1>have iron enriched enamel. They're like, I mean, it's it's

0:12:59.800 --> 0:13:03.600
<v Speaker 1>like something out of a comic book, right. The iron

0:13:03.600 --> 0:13:07.240
<v Speaker 1>makes their teeth stronger against this the pure mechanical stress

0:13:07.320 --> 0:13:09.560
<v Speaker 1>that they put them through. We should also note that

0:13:09.600 --> 0:13:12.880
<v Speaker 1>these teeth continue to grow throughout their lives, to the

0:13:12.880 --> 0:13:15.000
<v Speaker 1>point where they have to gnaw them down on trees

0:13:15.040 --> 0:13:18.080
<v Speaker 1>to keep them down. But yeah, they're just super resilient,

0:13:18.240 --> 0:13:21.520
<v Speaker 1>always growing, and they're also more resilient to acid as

0:13:21.559 --> 0:13:23.200
<v Speaker 1>well based on their composition.

0:13:23.760 --> 0:13:25.880
<v Speaker 2>Just some tough, rusty looking teeth.

0:13:26.440 --> 0:13:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, the orange is really quite shyy okay. Another

0:13:39.600 --> 0:13:43.400
<v Speaker 1>essential biological aspect of the beaver before getting into their behavior,

0:13:43.880 --> 0:13:47.600
<v Speaker 1>is that they have a cloaca. So most mammals do

0:13:47.679 --> 0:13:50.920
<v Speaker 1>not have a cloeca. There are some exceptions, you know,

0:13:50.920 --> 0:13:55.440
<v Speaker 1>you look at the monotremes, golden moles, marsupial moles, ten

0:13:55.480 --> 0:14:00.640
<v Speaker 1>rex just a few examples, but mammals have most lost

0:14:00.760 --> 0:14:04.240
<v Speaker 1>these general purpose openings over the course of their evolution,

0:14:04.640 --> 0:14:07.599
<v Speaker 1>but in beaver's they seem to be present as a

0:14:07.800 --> 0:14:12.360
<v Speaker 1>case of secondary evolution, perhaps as an adaptation I've read against.

0:14:12.640 --> 0:14:14.920
<v Speaker 1>It may have to do with the watery environments they

0:14:14.920 --> 0:14:19.480
<v Speaker 1>find themselves in, protecting themselves against infections that might occur

0:14:19.840 --> 0:14:22.680
<v Speaker 1>due to the state of that water. But it's also

0:14:22.720 --> 0:14:25.280
<v Speaker 1>something and this will become important, I believe in the

0:14:25.280 --> 0:14:27.480
<v Speaker 1>next episode as well. It can make it difficult to

0:14:27.520 --> 0:14:31.040
<v Speaker 1>sex a beaver, as males and females look pretty much

0:14:31.080 --> 0:14:34.080
<v Speaker 1>the same, unless the female happens to be pregnant or

0:14:34.160 --> 0:14:37.360
<v Speaker 1>nursing at the time that you're trying to sex them.

0:14:37.400 --> 0:14:39.440
<v Speaker 1>And when I say you, I of course mean people

0:14:39.480 --> 0:14:42.640
<v Speaker 1>who have authority and expertise to be out in the

0:14:42.680 --> 0:14:45.520
<v Speaker 1>wild trying to sex a beaver. You know, leave it

0:14:45.560 --> 0:14:47.880
<v Speaker 1>to the professional biologists.

0:14:47.440 --> 0:14:50.640
<v Speaker 2>Leave it to beaver scientists. Yes, so these.

0:14:50.560 --> 0:14:55.320
<v Speaker 1>Various features aid the beaver in its primary enterprise of

0:14:55.440 --> 0:15:00.400
<v Speaker 1>ecosystem engineering. We all know that beavers build dams, you know,

0:15:00.440 --> 0:15:03.240
<v Speaker 1>this is, of course is true of the cartoons. But

0:15:03.720 --> 0:15:07.120
<v Speaker 1>what does that really mean? Why? Why are beavers building dams?

0:15:07.120 --> 0:15:11.040
<v Speaker 1>What are they accomplishing, So they actively alter their ecosystem

0:15:11.120 --> 0:15:14.960
<v Speaker 1>via the blockage of rivers and streams with structures of

0:15:15.040 --> 0:15:19.480
<v Speaker 1>like you know, sticks, mud, chunks of trees, that sort

0:15:19.520 --> 0:15:23.440
<v Speaker 1>of thing, all cobbled together to dam up the water,

0:15:23.520 --> 0:15:26.520
<v Speaker 1>and this allows them to create new lakes, new ponds,

0:15:26.560 --> 0:15:31.880
<v Speaker 1>whole floodplains. Meanwhile, the lodges they construct for themselves are

0:15:31.920 --> 0:15:33.880
<v Speaker 1>also made out of this kind of stuff, branches and

0:15:33.960 --> 0:15:36.880
<v Speaker 1>mud and so forth, and they can only be accessed

0:15:36.880 --> 0:15:40.480
<v Speaker 1>from underwater entrances in their constructed ponds.

0:15:41.080 --> 0:15:43.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so this is something I don't know if I

0:15:43.120 --> 0:15:45.640
<v Speaker 2>realized before. I think a lot of people assume that

0:15:46.520 --> 0:15:50.200
<v Speaker 2>beavers live in their dams, but I think the better

0:15:50.240 --> 0:15:54.040
<v Speaker 2>way to think about it is beavers construct dams in

0:15:54.160 --> 0:15:59.440
<v Speaker 2>order to block waterways, which causes the area upstream of

0:15:59.480 --> 0:16:02.880
<v Speaker 2>the dams to deepen and have a more lake like

0:16:03.040 --> 0:16:06.640
<v Speaker 2>environment rather than a flowing river or stream. And then

0:16:06.800 --> 0:16:09.680
<v Speaker 2>in that flooded area that is where they build the

0:16:09.760 --> 0:16:12.520
<v Speaker 2>lodge they live in. So they sort of create a

0:16:12.600 --> 0:16:16.200
<v Speaker 2>flooded area which can it can serve multiple purposes, one

0:16:16.240 --> 0:16:19.440
<v Speaker 2>to house the lodge, but then also they can sort

0:16:19.440 --> 0:16:21.920
<v Speaker 2>of dig out from there. I think you're about to

0:16:21.920 --> 0:16:22.840
<v Speaker 2>mention something about this.

0:16:23.400 --> 0:16:26.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, they're a lot like humans. Human beings do this

0:16:26.560 --> 0:16:29.640
<v Speaker 1>with their modern technology. They come to say a dry

0:16:29.760 --> 0:16:33.760
<v Speaker 1>desert environment or a swamp environment, and they're like, you know,

0:16:33.800 --> 0:16:36.400
<v Speaker 1>what would go great here? What I would like for

0:16:36.600 --> 0:16:38.440
<v Speaker 1>my purposes of living here. I'd love it to be

0:16:38.520 --> 0:16:40.800
<v Speaker 1>just like a nice little park with some nice grass,

0:16:40.960 --> 0:16:43.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, and maybe a few trees. I'm going to

0:16:43.680 --> 0:16:47.080
<v Speaker 1>change everything so that it fits my needs. So the

0:16:47.120 --> 0:16:50.680
<v Speaker 1>primary purpose for the beaver dam is to create a

0:16:50.720 --> 0:16:54.760
<v Speaker 1>protective body of water for that lodge, making it even

0:16:54.800 --> 0:16:57.920
<v Speaker 1>more difficult for predators to get at them. And even

0:16:58.000 --> 0:17:00.840
<v Speaker 1>if predators were to get to them, they have that

0:17:00.960 --> 0:17:04.000
<v Speaker 1>underwater escape route in the event of an attack. That's

0:17:04.040 --> 0:17:06.320
<v Speaker 1>the that's the only way in and out now. It's

0:17:06.680 --> 0:17:10.000
<v Speaker 1>worth noting, however, that especially in parts of Eurasia, beavers

0:17:10.040 --> 0:17:12.720
<v Speaker 1>don't always have the same predator threat they once did.

0:17:13.119 --> 0:17:15.359
<v Speaker 1>But they build anyway because no one told them not to.

0:17:15.880 --> 0:17:18.960
<v Speaker 1>And also, more seriously, like, even though they are not

0:17:19.040 --> 0:17:21.440
<v Speaker 1>predators now, I mean that's you know, any kind of

0:17:21.480 --> 0:17:25.919
<v Speaker 1>evolutionary change would occur over a much vaster period of

0:17:25.920 --> 0:17:29.840
<v Speaker 1>time than the removal of their predators.

0:17:29.359 --> 0:17:32.359
<v Speaker 2>Amounts to right, So an environment full of say like

0:17:32.440 --> 0:17:35.000
<v Speaker 2>gray wolves and bears may have shaped them. And even

0:17:35.000 --> 0:17:37.480
<v Speaker 2>if there are many fewer of these predators than there

0:17:37.520 --> 0:17:40.080
<v Speaker 2>once was, that they are still the animal made by

0:17:40.080 --> 0:17:40.680
<v Speaker 2>that world.

0:17:41.200 --> 0:17:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Right. For instance, they're still certainly nocturnal creatures. I mean

0:17:44.320 --> 0:17:47.320
<v Speaker 1>they're also active, you know, dusk and dawn a little bit,

0:17:47.359 --> 0:17:51.600
<v Speaker 1>but during the day proper, they're inside, they're resting, and

0:17:51.720 --> 0:17:54.680
<v Speaker 1>part of that is to avoid predators. Now you mentioned earlier,

0:17:54.760 --> 0:17:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Joe that you even just looking at videos, you can

0:17:57.040 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 1>tell that they're more awkward on land than they are

0:18:00.080 --> 0:18:04.040
<v Speaker 1>in the water. And that's of course another big important

0:18:04.200 --> 0:18:08.040
<v Speaker 1>aspect of their damming of waterways, creating this sort of

0:18:08.119 --> 0:18:12.359
<v Speaker 1>vast flood plain, like turning a stream going through a

0:18:12.440 --> 0:18:16.280
<v Speaker 1>forest or something to this effect into kind of a

0:18:16.320 --> 0:18:21.240
<v Speaker 1>flooded forest environment. This opens up speedy water routes back

0:18:21.280 --> 0:18:23.920
<v Speaker 1>to their lodge. From perspective, feeding grounds.

0:18:24.119 --> 0:18:26.199
<v Speaker 2>Yes, sort of the same way. You can imagine it

0:18:26.280 --> 0:18:30.879
<v Speaker 2>like humans creating roads, like paved roads between say the

0:18:30.960 --> 0:18:33.520
<v Speaker 2>farms that they work during the day and the houses

0:18:33.560 --> 0:18:36.399
<v Speaker 2>they live in. But beavers would do this by instead

0:18:36.440 --> 0:18:39.240
<v Speaker 2>creating flooded areas. Especially they can sort of like dig

0:18:39.280 --> 0:18:42.240
<v Speaker 2>out channels along the bottom that the water from these

0:18:42.240 --> 0:18:45.879
<v Speaker 2>flooded areas can run into, allowing them to have a

0:18:45.960 --> 0:18:48.840
<v Speaker 2>sort of canals like roads made of water where they

0:18:48.840 --> 0:18:51.480
<v Speaker 2>can move quickly, where they can move submerged, which is

0:18:52.119 --> 0:18:54.760
<v Speaker 2>safer and better for them than trying to move awkwardly

0:18:54.800 --> 0:18:55.439
<v Speaker 2>over land.

0:18:56.119 --> 0:18:58.879
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Now, in doing this, of course, they alter the

0:18:58.920 --> 0:19:02.920
<v Speaker 1>ecosystem local ecosystem in a major way, opens up opportunities

0:19:02.920 --> 0:19:06.480
<v Speaker 1>for various other organisms as well, and also discuss some

0:19:06.560 --> 0:19:10.359
<v Speaker 1>of the potential downsides at least for some organisms in

0:19:10.359 --> 0:19:12.600
<v Speaker 1>a bit. But at any rate, this cements the beaver's

0:19:12.640 --> 0:19:18.240
<v Speaker 1>place as a keystone species. Beaver's just just completely change

0:19:18.320 --> 0:19:22.359
<v Speaker 1>the immediate environment, produces more open water, higher water tables.

0:19:23.000 --> 0:19:25.800
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, it's this entire system they have going for

0:19:25.840 --> 0:19:28.440
<v Speaker 1>them here. It's just so fascinating. You can if you

0:19:28.480 --> 0:19:32.280
<v Speaker 1>look online, you can find some some side profiles, some

0:19:32.400 --> 0:19:36.200
<v Speaker 1>cutaways of what the lodge looks like, and it's pretty ingenious.

0:19:36.520 --> 0:19:38.200
<v Speaker 1>It also serves as a place for them to store

0:19:38.280 --> 0:19:42.200
<v Speaker 1>food and even provides refuge during frozen months. They don't

0:19:42.320 --> 0:19:45.800
<v Speaker 1>hibernate properly, but they can hold up in there.

0:19:46.320 --> 0:19:48.200
<v Speaker 2>One of the things I've read about is that they

0:19:49.280 --> 0:19:53.000
<v Speaker 2>often can store lots of food, so they're vegetarians that

0:19:53.119 --> 0:19:56.960
<v Speaker 2>eat actually like you know, parts of trees, vegetation from

0:19:56.960 --> 0:19:59.800
<v Speaker 2>all around them, which they can keep stored in the

0:19:59.840 --> 0:20:05.080
<v Speaker 2>world water underneath the pond created by their dams, and

0:20:05.119 --> 0:20:08.000
<v Speaker 2>that's an interesting thing. They can raise the water level

0:20:08.119 --> 0:20:13.000
<v Speaker 2>in order to help protect areas of food storage in

0:20:13.119 --> 0:20:16.240
<v Speaker 2>the water for the winter, because by raising the water level,

0:20:16.320 --> 0:20:19.360
<v Speaker 2>they create more area underneath that won't freeze over when

0:20:19.400 --> 0:20:20.320
<v Speaker 2>the weather gets cold.

0:20:20.720 --> 0:20:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and these lodges and dams that they can even

0:20:25.160 --> 0:20:28.960
<v Speaker 1>though the beavers themselves tend to only live about I

0:20:28.960 --> 0:20:32.560
<v Speaker 1>think eight years max, a single lodge and dam can

0:20:32.600 --> 0:20:35.919
<v Speaker 1>be maintained over generations, so the lodges may end up

0:20:35.960 --> 0:20:39.120
<v Speaker 1>with like several stories to them, and the dams can

0:20:39.119 --> 0:20:42.560
<v Speaker 1>get quite massive. There's an Alberta area dam that was

0:20:42.560 --> 0:20:47.280
<v Speaker 1>built apparently in the nineteen seventies. Initially wasn't discovered till

0:20:47.280 --> 0:20:49.199
<v Speaker 1>around two thousand and seven because it's just out in

0:20:49.200 --> 0:20:51.320
<v Speaker 1>the middle of nowhere. It's not like in downtown Alberta.

0:20:51.400 --> 0:20:54.600
<v Speaker 1>It's like out in the boonies and it's thought to

0:20:54.600 --> 0:20:57.879
<v Speaker 1>be the world's largest beaver dam known beaver Dam anyway,

0:20:57.960 --> 0:21:01.440
<v Speaker 1>covering a good half mile. There's actually an Alice Obscure

0:21:01.520 --> 0:21:03.919
<v Speaker 1>article about it. If anyone's interested. Just look up world's

0:21:03.960 --> 0:21:06.920
<v Speaker 1>largest beaver dam and you can see some like aerial photographs.

0:21:07.600 --> 0:21:09.439
<v Speaker 2>You know, something interesting I was reading about was the

0:21:09.520 --> 0:21:14.919
<v Speaker 2>role of beavers in maintaining ecosystem health by allowing for

0:21:15.000 --> 0:21:18.760
<v Speaker 2>a greater diversity of different types of plant life to thrive.

0:21:18.840 --> 0:21:21.200
<v Speaker 2>I think sort of in the same way that forest

0:21:21.280 --> 0:21:23.879
<v Speaker 2>fires you might think of them as purely destructive. Of

0:21:23.920 --> 0:21:27.200
<v Speaker 2>course they are destructive, but you know, forest fires occur

0:21:27.800 --> 0:21:31.560
<v Speaker 2>naturally all the time, and when a forest burns, that

0:21:31.600 --> 0:21:35.520
<v Speaker 2>creates sort of new opportunities for new types of plants

0:21:35.520 --> 0:21:38.040
<v Speaker 2>and other life forms to thrive in a place that

0:21:38.160 --> 0:21:40.080
<v Speaker 2>was once covered up by you know, a lot of

0:21:40.119 --> 0:21:43.679
<v Speaker 2>tree canopy. So in the areas around beaver dams and lodges,

0:21:43.760 --> 0:21:46.120
<v Speaker 2>they will clear out lots of the trees. They literally

0:21:46.240 --> 0:21:48.280
<v Speaker 2>chew them down and they'll fall, and you know, the

0:21:48.320 --> 0:21:51.120
<v Speaker 2>beavers will do what they will with them. But this

0:21:51.160 --> 0:21:54.520
<v Speaker 2>creates all kinds of opportunities for other plants and other

0:21:54.800 --> 0:21:57.840
<v Speaker 2>life forms that wouldn't normally thrive in the forest to

0:21:58.800 --> 0:21:59.680
<v Speaker 2>have a shot.

0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah, the paper that I came across was talking

0:22:04.840 --> 0:22:07.000
<v Speaker 1>about sort of like the pros and cons. I have

0:22:07.040 --> 0:22:09.400
<v Speaker 1>another one I'll get into about some of the potential benefits,

0:22:09.400 --> 0:22:13.280
<v Speaker 1>but just to give you a full idea of sort

0:22:13.280 --> 0:22:17.040
<v Speaker 1>of the rodent altered landscape we're talking about here, I

0:22:17.080 --> 0:22:20.200
<v Speaker 1>was looking at a twenty fifteen paper published in IOP

0:22:20.400 --> 0:22:24.240
<v Speaker 1>conference series, or presented in the IOP conference series Earth

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:28.800
<v Speaker 1>and Environmental Science. This one is This was by Raskova

0:22:28.960 --> 0:22:31.840
<v Speaker 1>to Mina at All, and they talk about some of

0:22:31.880 --> 0:22:35.480
<v Speaker 1>the positive and negative consequences, at least initially stressing some

0:22:35.520 --> 0:22:39.120
<v Speaker 1>of the negatives maybe that are not at least instantly

0:22:39.160 --> 0:22:42.760
<v Speaker 1>discussed as much. But you get soil overwetting obviously, because

0:22:42.880 --> 0:22:46.479
<v Speaker 1>you're getting flooding occurrently it occurs. You also can have

0:22:46.600 --> 0:22:51.440
<v Speaker 1>water stagnation that results in lack of oxygen, high carbon concentration,

0:22:51.800 --> 0:22:55.199
<v Speaker 1>and the death of many aquatic organisms. And then the

0:22:55.240 --> 0:22:58.800
<v Speaker 1>flooding can also cause vegetation death. But at the same time,

0:22:59.040 --> 0:23:01.159
<v Speaker 1>the authors who are stressed that it can result in

0:23:01.200 --> 0:23:06.159
<v Speaker 1>a rise in the biodiversity of water organisms. So you know,

0:23:07.440 --> 0:23:10.360
<v Speaker 1>they're changing everything. They're changing the balance of the local ecosystem,

0:23:11.160 --> 0:23:13.879
<v Speaker 1>and it's creating a lot of opportunities for new things,

0:23:13.960 --> 0:23:17.359
<v Speaker 1>but it is also cutting things short for things that

0:23:17.400 --> 0:23:21.800
<v Speaker 1>we're living there already. Now, a really interesting study that

0:23:21.840 --> 0:23:25.359
<v Speaker 1>I came across this was a twenty twenty two Stanford

0:23:25.359 --> 0:23:29.240
<v Speaker 1>study by Dewey at All published in Nature Communications, And

0:23:29.359 --> 0:23:32.600
<v Speaker 1>in this paper they point out that beaver habitat ranges

0:23:32.680 --> 0:23:35.159
<v Speaker 1>in the US are going to continue to widen with

0:23:35.280 --> 0:23:38.920
<v Speaker 1>warming temperatures driven by climate change, but the benefits of

0:23:38.960 --> 0:23:44.679
<v Speaker 1>their dam building will actually quote overshadow climate extremesquote. So

0:23:45.000 --> 0:23:47.440
<v Speaker 1>this is not to say beaver dams will cancel out

0:23:47.440 --> 0:23:51.000
<v Speaker 1>climate change or anything like that, but in some respects

0:23:51.080 --> 0:23:54.680
<v Speaker 1>it kind of lessens the blow. Specifically as far as

0:23:54.800 --> 0:24:01.520
<v Speaker 1>water quality in mountain watersheds are concerned. Dams can raise

0:24:01.840 --> 0:24:07.480
<v Speaker 1>water levels upstream and divert water into soil and surrounding waterways,

0:24:08.000 --> 0:24:09.919
<v Speaker 1>and this ends up sort of, this ends up like

0:24:10.000 --> 0:24:14.640
<v Speaker 1>creating a robust filter system, a filtration system for excess

0:24:14.720 --> 0:24:20.000
<v Speaker 1>nutrients and contaminants for the water before it passes on downstream.

0:24:20.280 --> 0:24:23.040
<v Speaker 1>So today beaver's in North American eur Asia are both

0:24:23.119 --> 0:24:27.400
<v Speaker 1>doing great. They have bounced back from near extinction due

0:24:27.400 --> 0:24:29.719
<v Speaker 1>to hunting, and we may touch on some of that

0:24:30.080 --> 0:24:34.320
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more in the next episode, but because

0:24:34.320 --> 0:24:36.400
<v Speaker 1>there are a few different reasons that have driven beaver

0:24:36.520 --> 0:24:41.320
<v Speaker 1>hunting over the years. But to go back to speaking

0:24:41.320 --> 0:24:45.359
<v Speaker 1>of their construction of dams and their changing of the environment,

0:24:46.160 --> 0:24:49.560
<v Speaker 1>there's another great illustration I came across by Nicholas de

0:24:49.680 --> 0:24:53.360
<v Speaker 1>Fer who lives sixteen forty six through seventeen twenty, and

0:24:53.680 --> 0:24:56.160
<v Speaker 1>this is just a small scene from a larger map.

0:24:56.160 --> 0:25:01.199
<v Speaker 1>He was a French cartographer, so this is just you know,

0:25:01.240 --> 0:25:03.480
<v Speaker 1>filling in some of the blank spaces, like we've discussed

0:25:03.480 --> 0:25:06.639
<v Speaker 1>before on some of these older maps. But this illustration

0:25:06.800 --> 0:25:11.680
<v Speaker 1>shows beavers at work. They are downing trees and they

0:25:11.720 --> 0:25:15.359
<v Speaker 1>are dragging off the wood to build things. There are

0:25:15.600 --> 0:25:19.680
<v Speaker 1>the beavers themselves look largely accurate. There may be a

0:25:19.720 --> 0:25:24.240
<v Speaker 1>little more bear like, but the basic morphology is there.

0:25:24.640 --> 0:25:28.240
<v Speaker 1>The main problems here are that, first of all, there's like,

0:25:28.680 --> 0:25:31.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, one hundred beavers in this in this one image,

0:25:31.560 --> 0:25:34.639
<v Speaker 1>like they're working as an army. And then also like

0:25:34.800 --> 0:25:37.680
<v Speaker 1>clearly there wasn't a lot of detail on how they

0:25:37.720 --> 0:25:41.280
<v Speaker 1>carry the wood, because the central beaver that you see

0:25:41.600 --> 0:25:45.520
<v Speaker 1>is standing up in a bipedal posture with an armload

0:25:45.520 --> 0:25:48.520
<v Speaker 1>of wood. Thrown over his shoulder like a human being.

0:25:48.800 --> 0:25:52.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, like a Paul Bunyan carrying an axe.

0:25:52.840 --> 0:25:56.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. But I like the spirit of industry that they

0:25:56.160 --> 0:26:00.000
<v Speaker 1>captured here, despite some of the ridiculous details, and again

0:26:00.440 --> 0:26:04.960
<v Speaker 1>a huge improvement over some illustrations from previous centuries.

0:26:05.240 --> 0:26:07.359
<v Speaker 2>I wonder, is this one of the maps we looked

0:26:07.400 --> 0:26:09.960
<v Speaker 2>at in our horror Vakay episodes where we were talking

0:26:10.000 --> 0:26:12.560
<v Speaker 2>about maps with excessive illustrations.

0:26:12.880 --> 0:26:15.879
<v Speaker 1>I don't believe it is. I looked at a bigger

0:26:16.000 --> 0:26:17.720
<v Speaker 1>version of the map and I almost included it in

0:26:17.760 --> 0:26:20.159
<v Speaker 1>our notes, and I don't think I had seen it before.

0:26:21.000 --> 0:26:23.920
<v Speaker 1>It was a map that it's known as the beaver

0:26:24.040 --> 0:26:27.479
<v Speaker 1>map and has to do with the locations of beavers

0:26:27.480 --> 0:26:29.600
<v Speaker 1>because it has to do with the hunting of beavers,

0:26:30.119 --> 0:26:33.240
<v Speaker 1>which again was quite a big industry for a while there,

0:26:33.520 --> 0:26:36.520
<v Speaker 1>so big that it just about wiped them out. So

0:26:36.640 --> 0:26:40.040
<v Speaker 1>the large semi aquatic rodents have come to flood the

0:26:40.119 --> 0:26:44.679
<v Speaker 1>world and to remake it according to their designs. But

0:26:45.000 --> 0:26:49.560
<v Speaker 1>the weirdness and the complexity doesn't stop there. Joe tell

0:26:49.640 --> 0:26:54.119
<v Speaker 1>us a little bit about beaver society and about beaver

0:26:54.320 --> 0:26:55.000
<v Speaker 1>tool use.

0:26:55.760 --> 0:26:58.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Rob, I think you found one of these papers first,

0:26:58.760 --> 0:27:01.280
<v Speaker 2>and that's what started this whole. But I got lost

0:27:01.400 --> 0:27:04.480
<v Speaker 2>on a going down a rabbit hole or maybe a

0:27:04.520 --> 0:27:10.360
<v Speaker 2>beaver canal, trying to search out examples of possible tool

0:27:10.560 --> 0:27:14.680
<v Speaker 2>use documented in beavers, and in fact, there are a

0:27:14.720 --> 0:27:18.720
<v Speaker 2>few very interesting different observations corresponding to each of the

0:27:18.840 --> 0:27:23.399
<v Speaker 2>extant species. Beavers clearly are an interesting type of animal

0:27:23.440 --> 0:27:26.399
<v Speaker 2>to look at for signs of tool using intelligence, since

0:27:26.440 --> 0:27:30.479
<v Speaker 2>they are masters of manipulating their environment through the dams

0:27:30.520 --> 0:27:34.280
<v Speaker 2>and the lodges they build. Though I think it's interesting

0:27:34.359 --> 0:27:37.639
<v Speaker 2>that nest building is often not typically thought of or

0:27:37.680 --> 0:27:40.159
<v Speaker 2>not sort of front of mind as an example of

0:27:40.240 --> 0:27:43.800
<v Speaker 2>tool use. And there are different examples that different zoologists

0:27:43.920 --> 0:27:47.960
<v Speaker 2>or animal behavior experts will use to try to define

0:27:48.080 --> 0:27:50.919
<v Speaker 2>tool use. So in the papers I was looking at,

0:27:50.960 --> 0:27:55.240
<v Speaker 2>a few different standards were cited. One is a definition

0:27:55.280 --> 0:27:58.840
<v Speaker 2>of tool use by a researcher named Alcock, who says

0:27:58.960 --> 0:28:02.600
<v Speaker 2>it is quote the manipulation of an inanimate object that

0:28:02.720 --> 0:28:06.919
<v Speaker 2>improves the organism's efficiency in altering the position or form

0:28:07.119 --> 0:28:11.080
<v Speaker 2>of some other object. So, you know, using an inanimate

0:28:11.119 --> 0:28:15.440
<v Speaker 2>object from the environment to better alter the former position

0:28:15.760 --> 0:28:19.560
<v Speaker 2>of something else. Another definition I've found cited. This is

0:28:19.600 --> 0:28:24.199
<v Speaker 2>from Beck in nineteen eighty quote the external employment of

0:28:24.240 --> 0:28:29.440
<v Speaker 2>an unattached environmental object to alter more efficiently the form, position,

0:28:29.760 --> 0:28:34.480
<v Speaker 2>or condition of another object, another organism, or the user itself,

0:28:34.560 --> 0:28:37.960
<v Speaker 2>when the user holds or carries the tool during or

0:28:38.040 --> 0:28:41.040
<v Speaker 2>just prior to use, and is responsible for the proper

0:28:41.080 --> 0:28:45.320
<v Speaker 2>and effective orientation of the tool. Now, I appreciate all

0:28:45.360 --> 0:28:47.560
<v Speaker 2>of the conditions on that, because I think it is

0:28:47.600 --> 0:28:50.720
<v Speaker 2>important for people to be specific about what they're talking

0:28:50.760 --> 0:28:52.960
<v Speaker 2>about when they look for examples of tool use. But

0:28:53.040 --> 0:28:57.760
<v Speaker 2>I also wonder, once you're specifying that many conditions, is

0:28:57.920 --> 0:29:01.000
<v Speaker 2>the category of tool use becoming more or like a

0:29:01.040 --> 0:29:05.240
<v Speaker 2>function of the definition you lay out than than a

0:29:05.320 --> 0:29:09.160
<v Speaker 2>fundamentally different type of activity itself than some other activity

0:29:09.280 --> 0:29:11.480
<v Speaker 2>that that wouldn't quite fit this definition.

0:29:11.880 --> 0:29:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, and sometimes we can almost get too

0:29:13.840 --> 0:29:16.040
<v Speaker 1>hung up, I think, on the on the the idea

0:29:16.040 --> 0:29:17.880
<v Speaker 1>of tool use and the definition of tool use, because

0:29:17.880 --> 0:29:20.840
<v Speaker 1>we'll look at the most complicated burden, nest or bower

0:29:21.240 --> 0:29:23.640
<v Speaker 1>that you can imagine and will be like, well, it's intricate,

0:29:23.680 --> 0:29:27.480
<v Speaker 1>it's amazing, it's beautiful. But have you seen this monkey

0:29:27.720 --> 0:29:31.680
<v Speaker 1>stabbing a smaller monkey with a stick. You know, it's

0:29:32.120 --> 0:29:35.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, you know, it can almost you can almost

0:29:35.520 --> 0:29:37.880
<v Speaker 1>set it up as this this thing that is the

0:29:37.920 --> 0:29:40.040
<v Speaker 1>thing that we do. You know, that is a very

0:29:40.080 --> 0:29:42.240
<v Speaker 1>there's something very human about tool use, and you know,

0:29:42.280 --> 0:29:46.560
<v Speaker 1>obviously a huge, huge aspect of human life and human development.

0:29:46.960 --> 0:29:50.880
<v Speaker 1>But but yeah, it's it seems like at times a

0:29:50.920 --> 0:29:54.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of extra mental gymnastics is it has to be,

0:29:54.600 --> 0:29:56.960
<v Speaker 1>it has to be utilized in order to even discuss it.

0:29:57.120 --> 0:29:59.000
<v Speaker 2>So I'm not going to get super hung up on

0:29:59.560 --> 0:30:02.280
<v Speaker 2>definition of tool use or what really counts as tool

0:30:02.360 --> 0:30:04.840
<v Speaker 2>use today. We've talked about some of those debates in

0:30:05.240 --> 0:30:08.440
<v Speaker 2>plenty of episodes in the past. Instead, I'm just going

0:30:08.520 --> 0:30:12.120
<v Speaker 2>to talk about some studies describing specific behaviors, and you

0:30:12.160 --> 0:30:14.120
<v Speaker 2>can make up your own mind about whether it seems

0:30:14.120 --> 0:30:16.200
<v Speaker 2>like tool use to you. So the first thing I

0:30:16.200 --> 0:30:19.960
<v Speaker 2>want to talk about is an older observation. It's older

0:30:20.000 --> 0:30:22.120
<v Speaker 2>than either of the two papers that I'm going to

0:30:22.160 --> 0:30:24.320
<v Speaker 2>discuss here, but it's cited in the first of them,

0:30:24.320 --> 0:30:27.360
<v Speaker 2>and I'll get to that paper itself in a second.

0:30:27.480 --> 0:30:32.080
<v Speaker 2>But the observation is that a researcher named Georgio Pilleri

0:30:32.640 --> 0:30:37.000
<v Speaker 2>observed something interesting while studying two captive beavers at the

0:30:37.080 --> 0:30:42.160
<v Speaker 2>Burn Brain Anatomy Institute in nineteen eighty three. So the

0:30:42.200 --> 0:30:45.400
<v Speaker 2>beavers were living in a concrete pool that was supplied

0:30:45.440 --> 0:30:49.600
<v Speaker 2>with a constant flow of fresh water, and overflow of

0:30:49.600 --> 0:30:52.400
<v Speaker 2>this pool was routed away through a series of three

0:30:52.920 --> 0:30:56.840
<v Speaker 2>drain holes, each zero point eight centimeters in diameters, so

0:30:56.960 --> 0:31:00.600
<v Speaker 2>little holes in. The beavers had been given a supply

0:31:00.760 --> 0:31:03.600
<v Speaker 2>of sticks and twigs to do what they wanted with,

0:31:04.160 --> 0:31:07.920
<v Speaker 2>and for some reason, what they did is they selected

0:31:08.040 --> 0:31:12.360
<v Speaker 2>and cut three sticks from their supply to the exact

0:31:12.520 --> 0:31:16.520
<v Speaker 2>dimensions needed to plug the tiny drain holes that where

0:31:16.560 --> 0:31:20.200
<v Speaker 2>water drained away from their pool. And this completely stopped

0:31:20.280 --> 0:31:23.920
<v Speaker 2>the flow of water away from the pool. Now what's

0:31:24.000 --> 0:31:26.000
<v Speaker 2>going on here? At first, it was kind of hard

0:31:26.000 --> 0:31:29.760
<v Speaker 2>for me to believe this would be fully intentional behavior,

0:31:29.800 --> 0:31:32.400
<v Speaker 2>as in, like the beavers understood that they were plugging

0:31:32.440 --> 0:31:35.840
<v Speaker 2>the drains to stop the flow of water from their enclosure.

0:31:36.960 --> 0:31:38.960
<v Speaker 2>But then I thought, you know, I guess I wouldn't

0:31:38.960 --> 0:31:42.920
<v Speaker 2>be surprised if beavers have like a sense for detecting

0:31:43.040 --> 0:31:46.240
<v Speaker 2>gaps in dams and plugging them, Like maybe they're good

0:31:46.240 --> 0:31:49.640
<v Speaker 2>at sensing. My first instinct was maybe they sense like

0:31:49.800 --> 0:31:52.160
<v Speaker 2>the delta pee. You know, the difference in pressure, like

0:31:52.200 --> 0:31:54.680
<v Speaker 2>when water from a large pool is flowing out of

0:31:54.680 --> 0:31:57.040
<v Speaker 2>a small piper hole and you could feel that pressure

0:31:57.320 --> 0:31:59.080
<v Speaker 2>that would like get your hands stuck to the hole

0:31:59.120 --> 0:32:02.000
<v Speaker 2>if you held it there, or which in larger scenarios

0:32:02.040 --> 0:32:04.600
<v Speaker 2>can be of a great danger to divers. You know,

0:32:04.640 --> 0:32:07.000
<v Speaker 2>you don't want to go near like the intake hole

0:32:07.120 --> 0:32:10.240
<v Speaker 2>at a dam, if you're diving near it. I thought

0:32:10.920 --> 0:32:14.520
<v Speaker 2>maybe they sense the delta pee, and so they sense

0:32:14.640 --> 0:32:17.120
<v Speaker 2>that and they naturally want to plug it up, But

0:32:17.280 --> 0:32:20.760
<v Speaker 2>I didn't know. However, I then sort of came across

0:32:20.800 --> 0:32:24.360
<v Speaker 2>an answer. So I was watching a segment on North

0:32:24.400 --> 0:32:28.800
<v Speaker 2>American beavers from BBC Earth narrated by David Attenborough, and

0:32:29.160 --> 0:32:34.120
<v Speaker 2>this documentary segment captured a scene of beavers finding a

0:32:34.280 --> 0:32:37.920
<v Speaker 2>leak in their dam and then getting right to work

0:32:38.040 --> 0:32:41.320
<v Speaker 2>retrieving wood, vegetation and clumps of sediment down from the

0:32:41.320 --> 0:32:43.920
<v Speaker 2>bottom of the pond to plug up the leak in

0:32:43.960 --> 0:32:47.160
<v Speaker 2>the dam where water was running over the top. And Attenborough,

0:32:47.360 --> 0:32:51.360
<v Speaker 2>in this documentary segment narrates that beavers are thought to

0:32:51.400 --> 0:32:55.640
<v Speaker 2>detect these leaks by hearing the sound of trickling water

0:32:56.280 --> 0:32:59.640
<v Speaker 2>and when they do, they begin repair work almost immediately.

0:33:00.000 --> 0:33:04.560
<v Speaker 2>It seems to be fastidious, almost compulsive. This compulsive desire

0:33:04.600 --> 0:33:07.960
<v Speaker 2>to fix the holes when they hear the water trickling,

0:33:08.120 --> 0:33:11.400
<v Speaker 2>and this would make the drain plugging behavior in the

0:33:11.440 --> 0:33:14.840
<v Speaker 2>concrete enclosure in the eighties make a lot more sense.

0:33:15.080 --> 0:33:17.840
<v Speaker 2>So I decided to look into this further to see

0:33:18.600 --> 0:33:21.280
<v Speaker 2>if this was indeed true to some degree. It seems

0:33:21.320 --> 0:33:25.040
<v Speaker 2>it is, and so I didn't have time. This was

0:33:25.160 --> 0:33:27.040
<v Speaker 2>soon before we started recording. I didn't have time to

0:33:27.080 --> 0:33:30.080
<v Speaker 2>find the primary reference on this, but I did find

0:33:30.160 --> 0:33:34.040
<v Speaker 2>a good twenty fifteen Gizmoto blog post by Esther inglis

0:33:34.160 --> 0:33:39.200
<v Speaker 2>Arkell writing up summarizing the research of a Swedish zoologist

0:33:39.240 --> 0:33:43.280
<v Speaker 2>named Lars Wilson who studied beavers back in the nineteen sixties,

0:33:43.720 --> 0:33:46.880
<v Speaker 2>and according to the summary, Lars Wilson found that dam

0:33:47.000 --> 0:33:51.200
<v Speaker 2>building was instinctual rather than learned, and the way Wilson

0:33:51.240 --> 0:33:54.320
<v Speaker 2>identified with this was that if you took young beavers

0:33:54.400 --> 0:33:57.640
<v Speaker 2>and you separated them from their parents at birth, they

0:33:57.680 --> 0:34:00.960
<v Speaker 2>would still build dams basically the same way, using the

0:34:01.000 --> 0:34:03.800
<v Speaker 2>same techniques as their parents, even though they were clearly

0:34:03.840 --> 0:34:06.120
<v Speaker 2>not having the opportunity to be taught to do that.

0:34:06.560 --> 0:34:08.400
<v Speaker 2>So it seems based on that at least this is

0:34:08.400 --> 0:34:11.920
<v Speaker 2>probably a routine behavior. It's based on beaver DNA. They

0:34:11.920 --> 0:34:15.359
<v Speaker 2>don't have to be taught. But Wilson also found that

0:34:15.480 --> 0:34:20.560
<v Speaker 2>beavers didn't always build dams. In environments with still water

0:34:20.840 --> 0:34:24.360
<v Speaker 2>or only very gently moving water, dam building was not

0:34:24.400 --> 0:34:26.480
<v Speaker 2>a priority. The beavers would just maybe they like dig

0:34:26.520 --> 0:34:28.600
<v Speaker 2>a hole in the mud and just chill there, you know,

0:34:28.840 --> 0:34:32.360
<v Speaker 2>they just wouldn't build. And so by manipulating different variables,

0:34:32.360 --> 0:34:37.200
<v Speaker 2>Wilson identified the sound of trickling water as the primary

0:34:37.200 --> 0:34:39.799
<v Speaker 2>trigger for dam building, even to the point of a

0:34:39.840 --> 0:34:42.480
<v Speaker 2>discovery that this was the part I found most fascinating.

0:34:42.640 --> 0:34:46.399
<v Speaker 2>If you put a speaker in the beaver's enclosure and

0:34:46.480 --> 0:34:50.400
<v Speaker 2>you played the sound of trickling water through it, the

0:34:50.440 --> 0:34:53.560
<v Speaker 2>beavers would go to the speaker and start building on

0:34:53.640 --> 0:34:56.120
<v Speaker 2>top of it. They would start piling up sticks and

0:34:56.239 --> 0:35:00.960
<v Speaker 2>mud and branches over the speaker playing the sounds. They

0:35:01.000 --> 0:35:04.520
<v Speaker 2>were trying to plug the speaker to make it stop leaking.

0:35:05.200 --> 0:35:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Oh my goodness.

0:35:06.480 --> 0:35:09.839
<v Speaker 2>Wilson also found that if outflow pipes, so you had

0:35:09.880 --> 0:35:13.680
<v Speaker 2>a place where there was actually water leading away from

0:35:13.840 --> 0:35:17.440
<v Speaker 2>the pool, but you carefully designed the pipe so that

0:35:17.480 --> 0:35:20.000
<v Speaker 2>they made no noise, the beavers would not be able

0:35:20.000 --> 0:35:22.440
<v Speaker 2>to find and cover them. So this might lead you

0:35:22.480 --> 0:35:25.480
<v Speaker 2>to think, okay, so like the louder the rushing of

0:35:25.520 --> 0:35:28.239
<v Speaker 2>the water, the more beavers want to make a damn there.

0:35:28.320 --> 0:35:30.880
<v Speaker 2>But it also seems like it's not quite that simple,

0:35:31.040 --> 0:35:34.440
<v Speaker 2>because I was reading a news article from the Harvard

0:35:34.480 --> 0:35:37.759
<v Speaker 2>Graduate School of the Arts and Sciences called Damned If

0:35:37.800 --> 0:35:42.280
<v Speaker 2>They Do by Paul Massari. This article profiles the research

0:35:42.400 --> 0:35:46.359
<v Speaker 2>of an environmental engineer named Jordan Kennedy who has done

0:35:46.440 --> 0:35:50.160
<v Speaker 2>research on beavers and their dam building practices and the

0:35:50.239 --> 0:35:55.520
<v Speaker 2>environmental effects thereof. And Kennedy says that it can't just

0:35:55.760 --> 0:35:58.919
<v Speaker 2>be about the like the magnitude of sound of moving water,

0:35:59.120 --> 0:36:02.280
<v Speaker 2>or beavers would be trying to build dams across Niagara Falls,

0:36:02.320 --> 0:36:05.720
<v Speaker 2>you know, just like loud, violent, rushing waters where building

0:36:05.760 --> 0:36:08.560
<v Speaker 2>would be totally impractical. So instead, there's got to be

0:36:08.560 --> 0:36:12.480
<v Speaker 2>a kind of Goldilocks zone for dam construction, something that

0:36:12.520 --> 0:36:15.880
<v Speaker 2>the beavers naturally detect that allows them to know, Okay,

0:36:15.920 --> 0:36:18.879
<v Speaker 2>this is about the right amount of flow to try

0:36:18.920 --> 0:36:19.640
<v Speaker 2>to dam up.

0:36:20.160 --> 0:36:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, damming up Niagara Falls, like obviously, that would

0:36:23.120 --> 0:36:26.400
<v Speaker 1>be great like, that's kind of like the beaver fan fiction.

0:36:26.560 --> 0:36:30.120
<v Speaker 1>That's the pipe drain, But is it practical. No, you

0:36:30.160 --> 0:36:32.960
<v Speaker 1>need to have that just the right environment that can

0:36:33.000 --> 0:36:37.240
<v Speaker 1>then be manipulated to make the ideal environment for the beaver.

0:36:37.880 --> 0:36:41.160
<v Speaker 2>Right, So, the author of this article writes, quote, the

0:36:41.200 --> 0:36:43.960
<v Speaker 2>water in a beaver's habitat needs to be a certain depth,

0:36:44.080 --> 0:36:47.239
<v Speaker 2>for instance, to keep a food cache from freezing to

0:36:47.280 --> 0:36:51.000
<v Speaker 2>the bottom in winter and to enable them to evade predators.

0:36:51.320 --> 0:36:54.200
<v Speaker 2>The plants that beavers prefer to eat flourish best when

0:36:54.280 --> 0:36:58.279
<v Speaker 2>water flows at a certain velocity. So you're looking for

0:36:58.360 --> 0:37:02.080
<v Speaker 2>this goldilocks zone, an area of a certain amount of

0:37:02.160 --> 0:37:04.800
<v Speaker 2>water flow, maybe a certain narrowness of the channel or

0:37:04.880 --> 0:37:08.120
<v Speaker 2>certain depth of the channel, and that's the place where

0:37:08.160 --> 0:37:11.239
<v Speaker 2>you want to dam it up. And beavers apparently they

0:37:11.320 --> 0:37:15.640
<v Speaker 2>locate that. A big part of the sense data informing

0:37:15.680 --> 0:37:18.680
<v Speaker 2>them of that area appears to be sound. Maybe maybe

0:37:18.719 --> 0:37:20.839
<v Speaker 2>the overwhelming part of it is sound, but there may

0:37:20.840 --> 0:37:24.279
<v Speaker 2>be other cues as well, and so I don't know.

0:37:24.320 --> 0:37:26.200
<v Speaker 2>I thought this was so interesting, and I'm just trying

0:37:26.239 --> 0:37:29.160
<v Speaker 2>to imagine what it's like to be a beaver, to

0:37:29.320 --> 0:37:35.200
<v Speaker 2>have this powerful instinctual drive to plug leaks. So imagine

0:37:35.239 --> 0:37:38.680
<v Speaker 2>the same kind of base level instinctual drive that humans

0:37:38.719 --> 0:37:42.799
<v Speaker 2>might have for sex, or for food, or to care

0:37:42.840 --> 0:37:46.400
<v Speaker 2>for children, all the like the most powerful drives in

0:37:46.440 --> 0:37:49.839
<v Speaker 2>our brains. But there's a drive like that to hunt

0:37:49.880 --> 0:37:52.840
<v Speaker 2>down the source of anything that sounds like trickling water

0:37:53.000 --> 0:37:57.239
<v Speaker 2>and to just plug it with junk. You know, I

0:37:57.280 --> 0:37:59.520
<v Speaker 2>don't know. That's like, that's another that's another type of

0:37:59.800 --> 0:38:02.560
<v Speaker 2>mind experience, a relationship to the environment.

0:38:03.280 --> 0:38:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Wow wow, yeah, Like what would yeah, how would like

0:38:07.400 --> 0:38:10.200
<v Speaker 1>we can't help but extrapolate that into like a human

0:38:10.400 --> 0:38:13.320
<v Speaker 1>like intellect and human like culture, Like what would advance

0:38:13.400 --> 0:38:17.440
<v Speaker 1>beaver civilization be? Like would they actually go after like

0:38:17.560 --> 0:38:23.240
<v Speaker 1>complete inundation, like a complete flooding situation, the destruction of

0:38:23.440 --> 0:38:26.640
<v Speaker 1>all naturally occurring waterfalls, or would they just kind of

0:38:26.680 --> 0:38:29.239
<v Speaker 1>dream about it? Or what would their TV shows be?

0:38:29.480 --> 0:38:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Would it just be like countless channels of leak plugging

0:38:33.880 --> 0:38:34.520
<v Speaker 1>and so forth.

0:38:35.160 --> 0:38:37.480
<v Speaker 2>The speaver thought she had it all, but then she

0:38:37.600 --> 0:38:41.440
<v Speaker 2>heard the trickle and couldn't find it searching, Like all

0:38:42.160 --> 0:38:44.680
<v Speaker 2>dramas begin with the conflict of hearing a trickle.

0:38:45.520 --> 0:38:46.919
<v Speaker 1>That's the call to adventure.

0:38:47.000 --> 0:38:59.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but anyway, all that stuff I just read about

0:38:59.080 --> 0:39:02.359
<v Speaker 2>got kicked off because I was reading that anecdote about

0:39:02.400 --> 0:39:06.399
<v Speaker 2>the findings of Giorgio Pillari in nineteen eighty three, which

0:39:06.520 --> 0:39:09.840
<v Speaker 2>was cited in a paper by D. M. Barnes called

0:39:10.000 --> 0:39:13.600
<v Speaker 2>possible tool use by beavers cast Or canadensis in a

0:39:13.680 --> 0:39:17.719
<v Speaker 2>Northern Ontario watershed published in the Canadian Field Naturalist in

0:39:17.719 --> 0:39:20.040
<v Speaker 2>two thousand and five. So this is one of the

0:39:20.080 --> 0:39:23.560
<v Speaker 2>main two papers I was looking at about possible cases

0:39:23.560 --> 0:39:26.800
<v Speaker 2>of tool use in beaver's Barnes says that this report

0:39:26.840 --> 0:39:29.600
<v Speaker 2>is based on evidence relating to the North American beaver

0:39:30.360 --> 0:39:33.440
<v Speaker 2>that's Castor canadensis at a remote damn site in the

0:39:33.520 --> 0:39:37.600
<v Speaker 2>Chapleaux Crown Game Preserve in northern Ontario. The author says,

0:39:37.600 --> 0:39:41.480
<v Speaker 2>at this location they found a clump of willow stems,

0:39:41.800 --> 0:39:45.239
<v Speaker 2>so like little small tree trunks that had been cut

0:39:45.280 --> 0:39:49.160
<v Speaker 2>by beavers. But the fascinating thing was they were cut

0:39:49.280 --> 0:39:54.120
<v Speaker 2>at the extraordinary height of approximately one meter off the ground.

0:39:55.520 --> 0:39:58.759
<v Speaker 2>Beavers are not that tall normally, these beavers cut at

0:39:58.800 --> 0:40:03.280
<v Speaker 2>an average height of about thirty centimeters, so the beavers

0:40:03.320 --> 0:40:06.960
<v Speaker 2>were chomping off these willow trees at three times the

0:40:07.000 --> 0:40:11.440
<v Speaker 2>normal height they could reach with their teeth. Barnes writes, quote,

0:40:11.480 --> 0:40:14.799
<v Speaker 2>I made a careful examination of the area and found

0:40:14.840 --> 0:40:17.480
<v Speaker 2>that there was no apparent way the beavers could have

0:40:17.640 --> 0:40:20.480
<v Speaker 2>cut the stems at such a height. When I studied

0:40:20.480 --> 0:40:22.800
<v Speaker 2>the willow clump more closely, I noted that there was

0:40:22.840 --> 0:40:27.000
<v Speaker 2>a freshly cut willow stem approximately twelve centimeters in diameter,

0:40:27.600 --> 0:40:31.520
<v Speaker 2>leaning against the main stem of the willow clump. Its

0:40:31.560 --> 0:40:35.800
<v Speaker 2>approximate angle was forty five degrees. In addition, I observed

0:40:35.800 --> 0:40:39.840
<v Speaker 2>cutting at both ends of the leaning willow segment, and

0:40:39.880 --> 0:40:41.960
<v Speaker 2>then there was a There was a photo accompanying this

0:40:42.000 --> 0:40:45.320
<v Speaker 2>in the article. Now, at first the author thought that, okay,

0:40:45.360 --> 0:40:47.920
<v Speaker 2>so this is a log propped up forty five degrees

0:40:48.000 --> 0:40:51.719
<v Speaker 2>against the tree that is cut off very tall. The

0:40:51.760 --> 0:40:57.040
<v Speaker 2>author thought maybe this log there had simply fallen that way.

0:40:57.080 --> 0:40:58.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, it's something that the beaver cut and

0:40:58.960 --> 0:41:02.800
<v Speaker 2>then it fell. But that's impossible on further examination, because

0:41:02.840 --> 0:41:05.719
<v Speaker 2>the log was clearly from a different tree than the

0:41:05.760 --> 0:41:08.359
<v Speaker 2>stem it was leaning against, like there was different bark

0:41:08.480 --> 0:41:13.200
<v Speaker 2>texture and color and so forth, and its position just

0:41:13.239 --> 0:41:15.840
<v Speaker 2>did not seem plausible if it had fallen from above.

0:41:16.600 --> 0:41:20.320
<v Speaker 2>Another possibility the author considered was that these willow trunks

0:41:20.360 --> 0:41:23.520
<v Speaker 2>had been foraged while there was heavy snow on the

0:41:23.560 --> 0:41:25.959
<v Speaker 2>ground in the winter. So maybe the beavers were able

0:41:25.960 --> 0:41:29.160
<v Speaker 2>to reach a meter up the trunks of these trees

0:41:30.080 --> 0:41:34.400
<v Speaker 2>by crawling around on top of the snow. Okay, but

0:41:34.719 --> 0:41:37.880
<v Speaker 2>the author things that's really unlikely. Given the position of

0:41:37.880 --> 0:41:41.480
<v Speaker 2>the willow clump relative to the beaver dam and lodge

0:41:41.640 --> 0:41:44.640
<v Speaker 2>and its entrance and exit. It seems it would have

0:41:44.680 --> 0:41:49.279
<v Speaker 2>required a major overland journey by the beavers on the

0:41:49.320 --> 0:41:52.239
<v Speaker 2>top of the snow in the winter at a time

0:41:52.400 --> 0:41:56.480
<v Speaker 2>where this just would not fit with their normal behavior. Instead,

0:41:56.520 --> 0:41:59.520
<v Speaker 2>the author suggests that maybe what happened here is the

0:41:59.520 --> 0:42:03.480
<v Speaker 2>beaver used a prop. The beaver used a piece of

0:42:03.480 --> 0:42:05.960
<v Speaker 2>a log that it had cut off at both ends

0:42:06.440 --> 0:42:08.920
<v Speaker 2>and propped it up against the base of the trees,

0:42:09.080 --> 0:42:11.799
<v Speaker 2>and then climbed up that and was able to chew

0:42:11.880 --> 0:42:15.560
<v Speaker 2>off the willow stems at an upper level rather than

0:42:15.560 --> 0:42:18.400
<v Speaker 2>a lower level. Now, why would this even be beneficial?

0:42:18.920 --> 0:42:23.200
<v Speaker 2>The author says this would be probably to reduce foraging time.

0:42:23.840 --> 0:42:26.800
<v Speaker 2>So the longer you forage number one, the more thermal

0:42:26.840 --> 0:42:30.920
<v Speaker 2>stress you're exposed to not being the right temperature. But

0:42:30.960 --> 0:42:34.840
<v Speaker 2>more importantly, the longer you are exposed to predation. Apparently

0:42:34.840 --> 0:42:37.240
<v Speaker 2>beavers do not like to spend a lot of time

0:42:37.520 --> 0:42:40.680
<v Speaker 2>out on the ground out of the water, so they

0:42:40.719 --> 0:42:43.520
<v Speaker 2>are trying to hustle as fast as they can whenever

0:42:43.520 --> 0:42:47.040
<v Speaker 2>they're out there cutting, and in this case, apparently using

0:42:47.120 --> 0:42:50.880
<v Speaker 2>a cut stem to climb up the willow trunks to

0:42:51.040 --> 0:42:54.120
<v Speaker 2>access a higher up part of the tree to chew

0:42:54.160 --> 0:42:56.920
<v Speaker 2>through would have meant that they had to spend less

0:42:56.960 --> 0:42:59.799
<v Speaker 2>time chewing and less time cutting all right.

0:43:00.400 --> 0:43:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Like a little bit higher they just it's gonna be less,

0:43:03.440 --> 0:43:05.840
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be a narrow or bit of wood to

0:43:05.880 --> 0:43:06.359
<v Speaker 1>shoot through.

0:43:06.760 --> 0:43:10.160
<v Speaker 2>That's what I assumed. It didn't specify exactly why cutting

0:43:10.239 --> 0:43:13.200
<v Speaker 2>higher up was reduced foraging time, but that was my interpretation.

0:43:13.360 --> 0:43:17.040
<v Speaker 1>I could be wrong, and that's why they potentially could

0:43:17.080 --> 0:43:21.919
<v Speaker 1>be using essentially a beaver ladder, a beaver bit of scaffolding.

0:43:21.640 --> 0:43:24.200
<v Speaker 2>Right, But we don't know. This is just one observation.

0:43:24.520 --> 0:43:27.200
<v Speaker 2>And also they didn't see them doing it. They just

0:43:27.280 --> 0:43:30.200
<v Speaker 2>found this strange piece of scaffolding there later.

0:43:30.760 --> 0:43:33.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, more mysteries related to I mean, I guess this

0:43:33.440 --> 0:43:35.440
<v Speaker 1>is kind of cutting into some of the mysteries involved

0:43:35.440 --> 0:43:39.560
<v Speaker 1>in these wildly inaccurate depictions of beavers is that these

0:43:39.560 --> 0:43:44.640
<v Speaker 1>are creatures that live often in very rural situations, far

0:43:44.680 --> 0:43:48.920
<v Speaker 1>from human activity. They're probably doing it at night, and

0:43:48.960 --> 0:43:52.279
<v Speaker 1>they're spending as a little time necessary doing it out

0:43:52.320 --> 0:43:54.239
<v Speaker 1>where other eyes could see them.

0:43:54.760 --> 0:43:58.919
<v Speaker 2>Right, okay. Second paper I came across alleging possible tool

0:43:59.000 --> 0:44:02.600
<v Speaker 2>use behaviors by This is called tool use in a

0:44:02.680 --> 0:44:06.880
<v Speaker 2>display behavior by Eurasian beavers or castor fiber in the

0:44:06.920 --> 0:44:10.120
<v Speaker 2>journal Animal Cognition by Thompson at All in two thousand

0:44:10.120 --> 0:44:13.080
<v Speaker 2>and seven. So here the authors write that documentation of

0:44:13.120 --> 0:44:17.400
<v Speaker 2>tool use is relatively rare in rodents, and prior to

0:44:17.440 --> 0:44:20.880
<v Speaker 2>this paper there were no documented cases they knew of

0:44:20.880 --> 0:44:23.960
<v Speaker 2>of tools being used by rodents in what are called

0:44:24.160 --> 0:44:28.040
<v Speaker 2>agonistic displays. Now, agonistic is a word used in the

0:44:28.040 --> 0:44:32.319
<v Speaker 2>study of animal behavior to describe conflict or fighting. So

0:44:32.440 --> 0:44:37.080
<v Speaker 2>an agonistic behavior is not necessarily fighting itself, but also

0:44:37.160 --> 0:44:41.359
<v Speaker 2>could include social behaviors related to fighting. So these would

0:44:41.360 --> 0:44:45.040
<v Speaker 2>include threat displays trying to, you know, look big or

0:44:45.080 --> 0:44:49.640
<v Speaker 2>otherwise intimidate another animal, displays of aggression, as well as

0:44:49.680 --> 0:44:53.200
<v Speaker 2>things like submission or retreat behavior. The authors of this

0:44:53.280 --> 0:44:56.640
<v Speaker 2>paper say that in their field observations of the Eurasian beaver.

0:44:57.080 --> 0:45:00.800
<v Speaker 2>They witnessed the behavior that they call stick display, which

0:45:00.840 --> 0:45:05.480
<v Speaker 2>they interpreted as an agonistic display behavior. And what this

0:45:05.600 --> 0:45:08.560
<v Speaker 2>consisted of is beaver would go pick up an object,

0:45:09.160 --> 0:45:12.200
<v Speaker 2>usually a stick, whenever a stick was available, and then

0:45:12.200 --> 0:45:15.239
<v Speaker 2>it would rise up on its hind legs and then

0:45:15.640 --> 0:45:19.320
<v Speaker 2>move the upper body rapidly up and down while holding

0:45:19.360 --> 0:45:22.640
<v Speaker 2>the stick or other object in its mouth and front paws.

0:45:23.280 --> 0:45:25.560
<v Speaker 2>And Rabbi attached a picture for you to look at.

0:45:25.600 --> 0:45:27.680
<v Speaker 2>They had a photo of this. In this photo of

0:45:27.719 --> 0:45:30.680
<v Speaker 2>the beaver is in the shallow part of a waterway.

0:45:31.080 --> 0:45:34.200
<v Speaker 2>It's standing up on its back legs. It's kind of

0:45:34.680 --> 0:45:36.160
<v Speaker 2>I don't know how to just it's kind of like

0:45:36.360 --> 0:45:38.880
<v Speaker 2>roaring posture. But it's got a big old stick in

0:45:38.920 --> 0:45:41.279
<v Speaker 2>its mouth, and it's gripping the stick with its two

0:45:41.320 --> 0:45:44.799
<v Speaker 2>four paws, and the water is splashing all around as

0:45:44.880 --> 0:45:46.959
<v Speaker 2>the stick I guess, rapidly dips in and out.

0:45:47.280 --> 0:45:52.520
<v Speaker 1>It's impressive and it's frankly a little intimidating, this beaver saying, behold,

0:45:52.719 --> 0:45:55.799
<v Speaker 1>look at the feats of strength. I am capable of.

0:45:56.239 --> 0:45:59.279
<v Speaker 2>So several observations about this behavior. First of all, they say,

0:45:59.280 --> 0:46:02.880
<v Speaker 2>beaver's only picked up these display sticks or other objects

0:46:03.239 --> 0:46:06.200
<v Speaker 2>at the same location where they were used, and they

0:46:06.200 --> 0:46:09.279
<v Speaker 2>were never seen modifying the objects, so it wouldn't It

0:46:09.320 --> 0:46:12.040
<v Speaker 2>wasn't like they would carry a stick around and then

0:46:12.200 --> 0:46:15.680
<v Speaker 2>use it in a different location or modify the stick

0:46:15.680 --> 0:46:16.280
<v Speaker 2>in any way.

0:46:16.600 --> 0:46:19.080
<v Speaker 1>So, for instance, compare it to like human tool use

0:46:19.120 --> 0:46:23.120
<v Speaker 1>that we've discussed in the past rocks. This would not

0:46:23.200 --> 0:46:26.160
<v Speaker 1>be on the level of picking out favored rocks for

0:46:26.280 --> 0:46:30.799
<v Speaker 1>throwing at other humans, polishing them, changing them, etc. This

0:46:30.840 --> 0:46:33.360
<v Speaker 1>would be more on the level of when threatened, you

0:46:33.440 --> 0:46:35.839
<v Speaker 1>might look down, grab a rock and use it. Though

0:46:35.880 --> 0:46:37.520
<v Speaker 1>of course, in this case, the beavers are not hitting

0:46:37.520 --> 0:46:40.840
<v Speaker 1>each other with the sticks allegedly, the hypothesis here is

0:46:40.840 --> 0:46:43.600
<v Speaker 1>that they're using them as a pure defensive display.

0:46:44.080 --> 0:46:48.120
<v Speaker 2>Right. Second thing, This often happened in shallow water, so

0:46:48.239 --> 0:46:50.799
<v Speaker 2>the shaking of the stick would cause splashing in the

0:46:50.840 --> 0:46:54.480
<v Speaker 2>surrounding water, but occasionally it also took place on dry land,

0:46:54.600 --> 0:46:57.680
<v Speaker 2>such as in weeds, where there was no significant sound produced.

0:46:58.040 --> 0:47:00.800
<v Speaker 2>So the authors think because it took place in both

0:47:00.840 --> 0:47:03.640
<v Speaker 2>scenarios and when it was on dry land it didn't

0:47:03.640 --> 0:47:06.080
<v Speaker 2>really make a noise, they think it is primarily a

0:47:06.160 --> 0:47:09.640
<v Speaker 2>visual signal. An important bit of context is that Eurasian

0:47:09.680 --> 0:47:14.320
<v Speaker 2>beavers are territorial. They live in family groups with usually

0:47:14.360 --> 0:47:17.880
<v Speaker 2>a dominant breeding pair and then assorted offspring of that

0:47:17.960 --> 0:47:21.560
<v Speaker 2>breeding pair. And they defend the borders of their territory

0:47:21.600 --> 0:47:25.799
<v Speaker 2>from encroachment by other beavers. So they mark their territory

0:47:25.800 --> 0:47:29.440
<v Speaker 2>by scent. This is done with secretions from the anal

0:47:29.560 --> 0:47:33.879
<v Speaker 2>glands or castorium. Which castorium, I believe, we'll talk about

0:47:33.920 --> 0:47:37.160
<v Speaker 2>more later in the series in part two allegedly smells

0:47:37.160 --> 0:47:41.279
<v Speaker 2>like vanilla, but we'll come back. When rival beavers come

0:47:41.400 --> 0:47:44.479
<v Speaker 2>into a family group's territory, the home turf beavers will

0:47:44.520 --> 0:47:47.680
<v Speaker 2>react first of all with tail slapping. Rob you mentioned this.

0:47:47.680 --> 0:47:50.880
<v Speaker 2>This is a loud signal that beavers make by repeatedly

0:47:50.960 --> 0:47:53.920
<v Speaker 2>smacking the water surface with their tails. This is also

0:47:54.000 --> 0:47:56.480
<v Speaker 2>used to alert members of the family group when a

0:47:56.560 --> 0:48:01.319
<v Speaker 2>predator is cited. They also respond to unwelcome presence by

0:48:01.480 --> 0:48:05.320
<v Speaker 2>visual displays or sometimes with actual fighting, though physical fights

0:48:05.320 --> 0:48:08.600
<v Speaker 2>are relatively rare. The observations carried out in this study

0:48:08.640 --> 0:48:14.120
<v Speaker 2>were conducted on wild Eurasian beavers in southeast Telemark, Norway. Overall,

0:48:14.520 --> 0:48:18.440
<v Speaker 2>the researchers observed one hundred and thirty one cases of

0:48:18.560 --> 0:48:21.640
<v Speaker 2>stick display behavior that met the criteria for inclusion in

0:48:21.680 --> 0:48:25.359
<v Speaker 2>their study by four adult males, two adult females, and

0:48:25.440 --> 0:48:31.640
<v Speaker 2>five unidentified animals. However, it seems that some individual beavers

0:48:31.760 --> 0:48:35.520
<v Speaker 2>engaged in stick displays far more than the others.

0:48:35.840 --> 0:48:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Quote.

0:48:36.719 --> 0:48:40.359
<v Speaker 2>It was clear from our observations that one female beer

0:48:40.480 --> 0:48:44.719
<v Speaker 2>Git and one male Froda were the main performers, with

0:48:44.800 --> 0:48:47.720
<v Speaker 2>a contribution of fifty one point nine percent and thirty

0:48:47.719 --> 0:48:51.239
<v Speaker 2>five point nine percent, respectively, of the total number of

0:48:51.280 --> 0:48:54.160
<v Speaker 2>stick displays observed. So what does that add up to.

0:48:54.239 --> 0:48:56.960
<v Speaker 2>It's like eighty seven percent of stick displays were from

0:48:56.960 --> 0:48:57.880
<v Speaker 2>two beavers.

0:48:58.360 --> 0:48:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Wow, go Froda.

0:49:00.120 --> 0:49:02.439
<v Speaker 2>The real champion is beer Get here. She's got more

0:49:02.480 --> 0:49:04.520
<v Speaker 2>than half of them just under her belt.

0:49:04.880 --> 0:49:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah yeah, I mean really, beer Get needs to get

0:49:07.440 --> 0:49:10.600
<v Speaker 1>get most of the credit here from Froda doing pretty

0:49:10.600 --> 0:49:11.120
<v Speaker 1>well as well.

0:49:11.440 --> 0:49:14.480
<v Speaker 2>So they say, stick displays happened almost exclusively at the

0:49:14.480 --> 0:49:19.160
<v Speaker 2>borders of beaver family group territory, and most displays appeared

0:49:19.200 --> 0:49:23.040
<v Speaker 2>to be directed at rivals. The displays were often preceded

0:49:23.120 --> 0:49:26.760
<v Speaker 2>by scent marking, so this kind of suggests it probably

0:49:26.840 --> 0:49:30.840
<v Speaker 2>is being used as an agonistic display. However, this behavior,

0:49:30.960 --> 0:49:34.520
<v Speaker 2>while common in the groups observed in this study, is

0:49:34.560 --> 0:49:38.840
<v Speaker 2>not necessarily generalizable to the total world population of these beavers.

0:49:38.840 --> 0:49:42.320
<v Speaker 2>It has not really been observed in beaver's generally across

0:49:42.360 --> 0:49:46.680
<v Speaker 2>the full range, suggesting it may be specific to certain populations.

0:49:47.520 --> 0:49:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Wow, like even like some sort of like localized beaver culture.

0:49:51.960 --> 0:49:55.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, maybe apparently something. At the time of the study,

0:49:55.400 --> 0:49:59.080
<v Speaker 2>the author said there were some isolated reports of similar

0:49:59.080 --> 0:50:03.040
<v Speaker 2>behavior in a few North American beavers, but not most,

0:50:03.080 --> 0:50:06.319
<v Speaker 2>and it was not found in all Eurasian beavers either.

0:50:07.120 --> 0:50:10.160
<v Speaker 2>So the authors argue that stick displays might be especially

0:50:10.200 --> 0:50:14.320
<v Speaker 2>favored in high pressure situations. From reading their description of

0:50:14.440 --> 0:50:17.440
<v Speaker 2>the area, it seems like the groups observed in this

0:50:17.520 --> 0:50:22.680
<v Speaker 2>study might be in especially crowded beaver territory, where like,

0:50:23.239 --> 0:50:27.360
<v Speaker 2>you know, the areas around different family dams and lodge

0:50:27.400 --> 0:50:30.000
<v Speaker 2>sites are sort of all butting up against one another.

0:50:31.080 --> 0:50:34.160
<v Speaker 2>They also observed higher rates of stick displays in springtime,

0:50:34.239 --> 0:50:37.560
<v Speaker 2>meaning it's possible it could have some association with breeding.

0:50:38.280 --> 0:50:42.960
<v Speaker 2>But if the stick shaking is a genuine agonistic display behavior,

0:50:43.320 --> 0:50:47.920
<v Speaker 2>the evolutionary purpose would probably be to convey honest information

0:50:48.000 --> 0:50:50.919
<v Speaker 2>about the beaver's size and strength, so it's like, I'm

0:50:50.920 --> 0:50:53.520
<v Speaker 2>big and strong. Look at how I can shake this stick.

0:50:54.000 --> 0:50:56.160
<v Speaker 2>You don't want to bother actually getting into a fight

0:50:56.239 --> 0:50:57.640
<v Speaker 2>with me, right, we don't have to do this.

0:50:58.400 --> 0:51:01.439
<v Speaker 1>I like these sort of levels of communication that seem

0:51:01.480 --> 0:51:04.799
<v Speaker 1>to exist between beaver groups here. You know, it's like,

0:51:05.280 --> 0:51:07.879
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day, all beavers really want

0:51:07.920 --> 0:51:11.319
<v Speaker 1>to do is build things and plug holes. Uh. You

0:51:11.360 --> 0:51:13.800
<v Speaker 1>know they have they have a lot of hole plugging

0:51:13.840 --> 0:51:16.439
<v Speaker 1>to do. They have they have a lot of work

0:51:16.480 --> 0:51:18.520
<v Speaker 1>to accomplish. They don't really have time to get into

0:51:18.520 --> 0:51:21.359
<v Speaker 1>these fights. These fights are just would be destructive. Uh

0:51:21.719 --> 0:51:24.600
<v Speaker 1>So instead, let's just make sure that we're very clear

0:51:24.600 --> 0:51:29.120
<v Speaker 1>about how everyone feels about these these border scenarios, and uh,

0:51:29.239 --> 0:51:31.840
<v Speaker 1>if need be, let me just show you, give you

0:51:31.880 --> 0:51:34.279
<v Speaker 1>a taste of what could happen. Just look at this

0:51:34.400 --> 0:51:35.759
<v Speaker 1>stick lifting ability here.

0:51:36.200 --> 0:51:39.720
<v Speaker 2>The neighbors are getting nosy and beerget shakes a branch

0:51:39.800 --> 0:51:42.879
<v Speaker 2>and it's like, no, don't make me do it. Don't

0:51:42.920 --> 0:51:44.640
<v Speaker 2>make me do it. And it seems most of the

0:51:44.640 --> 0:51:48.600
<v Speaker 2>time they're like, Okay, I won't make you do it. Bergeit, man.

0:51:48.640 --> 0:51:50.279
<v Speaker 2>I think we've got to be out of time for

0:51:50.280 --> 0:51:52.879
<v Speaker 2>for part one of Beaver's here right, But there will

0:51:52.920 --> 0:51:53.320
<v Speaker 2>be more.

0:51:53.960 --> 0:51:56.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, in the next episode, we're gonna we're gonna get

0:51:56.280 --> 0:51:59.840
<v Speaker 1>back to that idea, that that false idea of beaver

0:52:00.560 --> 0:52:03.520
<v Speaker 1>whilst being hunted deciding to chew their own testicles off

0:52:04.520 --> 0:52:08.400
<v Speaker 1>again that you see various examples of, particularly from like

0:52:08.440 --> 0:52:11.920
<v Speaker 1>illuminated manuscripts and so forth and bestiaries. We'll come back

0:52:11.960 --> 0:52:14.479
<v Speaker 1>and to discuss that, plus who knows what else we'll

0:52:14.520 --> 0:52:18.560
<v Speaker 1>uncover about beavers in our research. In the meantime, we'd

0:52:18.560 --> 0:52:20.120
<v Speaker 1>love to hear from everyone out there if you have

0:52:20.200 --> 0:52:23.000
<v Speaker 1>any especially since a lot of times we do these

0:52:23.000 --> 0:52:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Tuesdays to Thursday. This one's going to be a Thursday

0:52:25.120 --> 0:52:26.719
<v Speaker 1>to Tuesday, so who knows, you might be able to

0:52:26.760 --> 0:52:31.520
<v Speaker 1>get some really core beaver facts and beaver experiences into

0:52:31.640 --> 0:52:35.279
<v Speaker 1>us before we record the next episode. You know something

0:52:35.280 --> 0:52:37.520
<v Speaker 1>you've picked up somewhere or just you know, accounts of

0:52:37.560 --> 0:52:41.120
<v Speaker 1>observing beavers in the wild. I'd love to hear about that. So,

0:52:41.400 --> 0:52:44.839
<v Speaker 1>whatever your feedback, whatever your thoughts, share them with us.

0:52:44.920 --> 0:52:47.440
<v Speaker 1>We would love to hear from you. Just a reminder

0:52:47.520 --> 0:52:49.880
<v Speaker 1>that Stuffed to Blow Your Mind is a science podcast

0:52:49.960 --> 0:52:53.520
<v Speaker 1>with core episodes on Tuesdays and Thursdays, So look for

0:52:53.520 --> 0:52:55.399
<v Speaker 1>those in the Stuff to Blow Your Mind podcast feed

0:52:55.400 --> 0:52:57.880
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your podcasts. On Mondays we do a

0:52:57.920 --> 0:53:01.240
<v Speaker 1>listener mail episode. On Wednesday's do a short form artifact

0:53:01.320 --> 0:53:04.360
<v Speaker 1>or monster fact episode. I know sometimes people say I

0:53:04.400 --> 0:53:07.520
<v Speaker 1>wish they were longer. Well, they're short. That's part of

0:53:07.800 --> 0:53:11.200
<v Speaker 1>how it works. But occasionally we're gonna put out We're

0:53:11.239 --> 0:53:14.200
<v Speaker 1>going to continue to experiment, experiment with putting out omnibus

0:53:14.239 --> 0:53:18.160
<v Speaker 1>episodes that may take up like multiple related monster facts

0:53:18.239 --> 0:53:21.239
<v Speaker 1>or artifacts, and put them out so periodically you'll get

0:53:21.280 --> 0:53:24.480
<v Speaker 1>a longer one in there as well. So yeah, let

0:53:24.600 --> 0:53:26.560
<v Speaker 1>us know if you're liking that, and we can keep

0:53:26.600 --> 0:53:28.600
<v Speaker 1>doing it. Oh and then on Fridays we set aside

0:53:28.640 --> 0:53:31.240
<v Speaker 1>most serious concerns to just talk about a weird movie

0:53:31.440 --> 0:53:32.520
<v Speaker 1>on Weird House Cinema.

0:53:32.640 --> 0:53:36.120
<v Speaker 2>Huge thanks to our audio producer JJ Posway. If you

0:53:36.160 --> 0:53:38.279
<v Speaker 2>would like to get in touch with us with feedback

0:53:38.320 --> 0:53:40.840
<v Speaker 2>on this episode or any other, to suggest a topic

0:53:40.840 --> 0:53:42.839
<v Speaker 2>for the future, or just to say hello, you can

0:53:42.920 --> 0:53:45.800
<v Speaker 2>email us at contact at stuff to Blow your Mind

0:53:45.920 --> 0:53:53.879
<v Speaker 2>dot com.

0:53:53.960 --> 0:53:56.880
<v Speaker 3>Stuff to Blow Your Mind is production of iHeartRadio. For

0:53:56.960 --> 0:53:59.760
<v Speaker 3>more podcasts from my Heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app

0:54:00.000 --> 0:54:15.160
<v Speaker 3>Apple Podcasts or wherever you're listening to your favorite shows,