WEBVTT - Cavs Pacers Preview with Tony East

0:00:00.320 --> 0:00:03.200
<v Speaker 1>This crowd rises to speaking.

0:00:02.920 --> 0:00:06.800
<v Speaker 2>What Carl slammed it out? Carlo left wing reball.

0:00:06.640 --> 0:00:07.440
<v Speaker 3>Perfect dar.

0:00:09.080 --> 0:00:11.799
<v Speaker 4>Pop, then he left block the shot at the rim

0:00:12.080 --> 0:00:15.960
<v Speaker 4>pow with the left hand head of fowl. Welcome to

0:00:15.960 --> 0:00:18.000
<v Speaker 4>the Chase Down Podcast, part of the Caves media family.

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:20.280
<v Speaker 4>I'm your host, Justin Rowan. The Chase Doown is presented

0:00:20.320 --> 0:00:23.000
<v Speaker 4>by Fubo, the official streaming partner of the Calves. Watch

0:00:23.040 --> 0:00:25.639
<v Speaker 4>over three hundred and fifty channels of live sports and TV,

0:00:25.720 --> 0:00:28.800
<v Speaker 4>including fan Duel Sports Network without cable. There's no cost

0:00:28.880 --> 0:00:31.680
<v Speaker 4>and no commitment. Try for free at FuboTV dot com

0:00:31.720 --> 0:00:34.640
<v Speaker 4>Slash Calves. We thought we might have to wait a

0:00:34.640 --> 0:00:37.080
<v Speaker 4>little bit longer to find out who was going to

0:00:37.120 --> 0:00:40.400
<v Speaker 4>be the Calves opponent in the next round. Unfortunately, or

0:00:40.440 --> 0:00:42.960
<v Speaker 4>fortunately depending on how you look at things. Uh, the

0:00:43.120 --> 0:00:46.839
<v Speaker 4>Milwaukee Bucks blew quite the lead in the final seconds

0:00:46.840 --> 0:00:48.919
<v Speaker 4>of the game, and we know that the Caves are

0:00:48.920 --> 0:00:51.880
<v Speaker 4>going to be playing the Indiana Pacers on Sunday. Joining

0:00:51.880 --> 0:00:54.320
<v Speaker 4>me today as always is my co host, Carl Rodriguez.

0:00:54.360 --> 0:00:57.880
<v Speaker 2>Carter, how you doing, buddy, I'm doing well. Uh, really

0:00:57.920 --> 0:01:00.400
<v Speaker 2>really excited for this series. I think it's the best

0:01:00.440 --> 0:01:04.240
<v Speaker 2>basketball series, you know, that they could have had in

0:01:04.280 --> 0:01:08.640
<v Speaker 2>the second round, you know, of anyone in the three

0:01:08.680 --> 0:01:11.920
<v Speaker 2>to you know, the three to six range. I thought

0:01:11.959 --> 0:01:15.800
<v Speaker 2>Andy was the toughest test in that group, and they're

0:01:15.840 --> 0:01:20.559
<v Speaker 2>gonna get to go prove themselves against much stiffer competition

0:01:20.920 --> 0:01:24.119
<v Speaker 2>than they had in the form of the Miami Heat.

0:01:24.440 --> 0:01:25.640
<v Speaker 2>Totally agree, Totally agree.

0:01:25.640 --> 0:01:27.959
<v Speaker 4>In my eyes, Indiana is the third best team in

0:01:27.959 --> 0:01:30.640
<v Speaker 4>the Eastern Conference and joining us today to help break

0:01:30.640 --> 0:01:33.679
<v Speaker 4>it down. Tony East from Locked On Pacers. Tony, how

0:01:33.760 --> 0:01:34.640
<v Speaker 4>you doing, buddy.

0:01:34.840 --> 0:01:37.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm great. I'm really happy to be here, and I'm

0:01:37.280 --> 0:01:40.360
<v Speaker 1>really looking forward to the series, which is perhaps the

0:01:40.480 --> 0:01:44.160
<v Speaker 1>least informative regular season matchups ever for a series that

0:01:44.200 --> 0:01:46.200
<v Speaker 1>I've ever had in my life for a playoffs.

0:01:46.880 --> 0:01:48.880
<v Speaker 4>It's not the first time because when we did the

0:01:49.000 --> 0:01:51.480
<v Speaker 4>next series a couple of years ago, we're like, you know,

0:01:51.560 --> 0:01:53.880
<v Speaker 4>every single one of these games, the Cats were missing

0:01:53.920 --> 0:01:56.360
<v Speaker 4>Jared Allen for almost all of them, Darius was missing,

0:01:56.680 --> 0:02:00.440
<v Speaker 4>like it seemed like there was never a regular matchup.

0:02:00.480 --> 0:02:03.560
<v Speaker 4>But you're right, I think, you know, you could probably

0:02:03.600 --> 0:02:06.800
<v Speaker 4>say one in one, but even there, Tyres Haliburn played

0:02:06.880 --> 0:02:10.760
<v Speaker 4>like a half of you know, the Pacers win in

0:02:10.800 --> 0:02:14.880
<v Speaker 4>that game. From a calf standpoint, that those two games

0:02:14.919 --> 0:02:18.520
<v Speaker 4>happened in January, Max Struz was getting integrated into the lineup.

0:02:18.520 --> 0:02:20.359
<v Speaker 2>He was coming off the bench in favor of Dean

0:02:20.400 --> 0:02:20.920
<v Speaker 2>Waite at the.

0:02:20.919 --> 0:02:24.520
<v Speaker 4>Time, and then we saw those two late season games

0:02:24.600 --> 0:02:28.040
<v Speaker 4>were about as uninformative as possible when it comes to

0:02:28.120 --> 0:02:29.440
<v Speaker 4>what the playoffs are going to look like.

0:02:29.840 --> 0:02:32.600
<v Speaker 1>You aren't expecting the Pacers to illegally play three two

0:02:32.680 --> 0:02:35.560
<v Speaker 1>way players plus two of their and the bench guys. Yeah,

0:02:35.600 --> 0:02:38.520
<v Speaker 1>those games are rather uninformative for this. And yeah, Alburn

0:02:38.560 --> 0:02:40.799
<v Speaker 1>missed half of one game and the entire other one

0:02:40.880 --> 0:02:43.440
<v Speaker 1>right like that, Even if that alone makes it very

0:02:43.520 --> 0:02:46.280
<v Speaker 1>challenging and makes this all the more fun because we

0:02:46.360 --> 0:02:48.320
<v Speaker 1>have no idea what the chess match or battles are

0:02:48.320 --> 0:02:50.000
<v Speaker 1>really going to look like. From two coaches who have

0:02:50.040 --> 0:02:53.239
<v Speaker 1>had great seasons being tactical.

0:02:53.560 --> 0:02:56.799
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's a pretty dope matchup, to be honest, And

0:02:56.880 --> 0:02:58.880
<v Speaker 2>like I've said a few times that I do think

0:02:58.919 --> 0:03:01.120
<v Speaker 2>both teams are going to have like, oh wait, we're

0:03:01.120 --> 0:03:04.560
<v Speaker 2>playing someone pretty competent all of a sudden kind of

0:03:04.639 --> 0:03:07.880
<v Speaker 2>shelf shock after like Indy just had had their way

0:03:08.120 --> 0:03:13.280
<v Speaker 2>offensively with Milwaukee pretty much the entire series. Through four games,

0:03:13.320 --> 0:03:16.079
<v Speaker 2>I think they'd assisted on seventy six percent of their

0:03:16.120 --> 0:03:19.600
<v Speaker 2>field goals, which is like a banana's number. I mean,

0:03:19.639 --> 0:03:22.239
<v Speaker 2>they're a high assist team, but not normally like twelve

0:03:22.480 --> 0:03:25.720
<v Speaker 2>fourteen percent higher than second best Tony. What did you

0:03:25.760 --> 0:03:29.000
<v Speaker 2>see from them in that Bucks series? Did anything surprise you?

0:03:29.160 --> 0:03:32.040
<v Speaker 2>Or was it a spot where it's a little hard

0:03:32.040 --> 0:03:35.320
<v Speaker 2>to evaluate because that Bucks team was not in their

0:03:35.360 --> 0:03:36.119
<v Speaker 2>best shape.

0:03:36.720 --> 0:03:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it was really interesting because, like I picked the

0:03:39.960 --> 0:03:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Pacers to win in seven games, I thought they'd be better,

0:03:42.600 --> 0:03:45.160
<v Speaker 1>but they were even better than I thought they would be.

0:03:45.320 --> 0:03:47.720
<v Speaker 1>And my big takeaway for why I was a little

0:03:47.760 --> 0:03:49.600
<v Speaker 1>wrong about that is and something that I think they'll

0:03:49.640 --> 0:03:51.880
<v Speaker 1>be hopeful to do again for every series they played

0:03:51.840 --> 0:03:54.160
<v Speaker 1>for the rest of their lives. They generated a good shot,

0:03:54.200 --> 0:03:56.760
<v Speaker 1>like whenever they wanted right, they'd come down the floor.

0:03:56.920 --> 0:03:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Outside of the second half of Game three, which was

0:03:58.840 --> 0:04:01.680
<v Speaker 1>the Bucks only win, they'd get across the timeline. They

0:04:01.680 --> 0:04:04.320
<v Speaker 1>would get into their what they call random offense. One

0:04:04.360 --> 0:04:06.880
<v Speaker 1>action here, one action there. The Bucks are rotating. All

0:04:06.920 --> 0:04:08.920
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden, someone's out of position, or someone's not

0:04:08.960 --> 0:04:11.000
<v Speaker 1>ready for what's coming next, or it's not a good

0:04:11.040 --> 0:04:13.280
<v Speaker 1>chance for the Bucks to switch what they did quite

0:04:13.320 --> 0:04:16.080
<v Speaker 1>a bit, and the Pacers would have a Pascal Siaka

0:04:16.160 --> 0:04:18.320
<v Speaker 1>being defended by a small guy or Tyre Salburn with

0:04:18.360 --> 0:04:20.640
<v Speaker 1>somebody he could get into the pain against, whether that

0:04:20.680 --> 0:04:23.240
<v Speaker 1>was for a passover his own shot or a favorable

0:04:23.240 --> 0:04:25.440
<v Speaker 1>matchup with some other other players who have improved as

0:04:25.760 --> 0:04:28.800
<v Speaker 1>rim attackers, either this season or throughout their careers, and

0:04:28.839 --> 0:04:31.559
<v Speaker 1>they took advantage of that, like it was extremely easy

0:04:31.600 --> 0:04:33.680
<v Speaker 1>for them to score. It's funny because every time I

0:04:33.760 --> 0:04:35.480
<v Speaker 1>go to check, I'm like, Okay, the Pacers surely are

0:04:35.520 --> 0:04:37.680
<v Speaker 1>leading the playoffs on offensive rating. Oh, they're second behind

0:04:37.720 --> 0:04:40.920
<v Speaker 1>the Caves by like twenty points. But they still scored

0:04:41.080 --> 0:04:43.640
<v Speaker 1>very easily in the first round. And not that the

0:04:43.680 --> 0:04:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Bucks were like an awesome defense, but they were top twelve,

0:04:45.920 --> 0:04:47.719
<v Speaker 1>and during the regular season I thought there would be

0:04:48.200 --> 0:04:50.920
<v Speaker 1>some more resistance. They do have size, they do have gianness,

0:04:51.240 --> 0:04:54.040
<v Speaker 1>but outside of that second half of Game three and

0:04:54.440 --> 0:04:56.240
<v Speaker 1>like a little bit of tripping over themselves in Game

0:04:56.279 --> 0:04:58.480
<v Speaker 1>five a couple of days ago, they could just score

0:04:58.560 --> 0:05:00.279
<v Speaker 1>whenever they wanted, and that made it easy for them

0:05:00.320 --> 0:05:02.159
<v Speaker 1>to kind of set the terms of engagement every game.

0:05:02.480 --> 0:05:06.359
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, yeah, just I was just going to say, you know, Indiana,

0:05:06.800 --> 0:05:09.120
<v Speaker 4>the random offense, as he said, what they do with

0:05:09.120 --> 0:05:10.640
<v Speaker 4>the pick and roll and stuff like that. I just

0:05:10.960 --> 0:05:13.720
<v Speaker 4>felt like such a bad matchup for the Bucks. I

0:05:14.160 --> 0:05:16.760
<v Speaker 4>think I picked the Indian in five or six, I

0:05:17.000 --> 0:05:19.279
<v Speaker 4>can't remember. And obviously, you know, I was assuming Dame

0:05:19.360 --> 0:05:22.120
<v Speaker 4>was going to remain healthy throughout the series. But you know,

0:05:22.560 --> 0:05:24.479
<v Speaker 4>even prior to Dame getting hurt, I think it was

0:05:24.560 --> 0:05:26.560
<v Speaker 4>clear that it was just such a different matchup. And

0:05:26.600 --> 0:05:29.280
<v Speaker 4>when you have you know, Brook Lopez playing drop defense,

0:05:29.520 --> 0:05:32.880
<v Speaker 4>you have Bobby Portis out there like that, They're just

0:05:33.000 --> 0:05:36.240
<v Speaker 4>not equipped to handle kind of what Indies Bread and

0:05:36.279 --> 0:05:39.919
<v Speaker 4>Butter is offensively. And to Carter's point, I think this

0:05:40.200 --> 0:05:42.040
<v Speaker 4>series is going to be a shock to the system

0:05:42.080 --> 0:05:45.400
<v Speaker 4>for both teams because I was looking at it and

0:05:45.560 --> 0:05:50.400
<v Speaker 4>Indies and Miami's defenses were identical basically post All Star Break.

0:05:50.600 --> 0:05:52.880
<v Speaker 4>You look at some of the regular season numbers, Miami

0:05:52.960 --> 0:05:56.159
<v Speaker 4>was a bit better shooting from three in comparison to Indiana.

0:05:56.240 --> 0:05:59.840
<v Speaker 4>But despite those numbers, I don't feel that's true. I

0:06:00.839 --> 0:06:03.440
<v Speaker 4>understand that over an eighty two game sample, that's kind

0:06:03.440 --> 0:06:07.000
<v Speaker 4>of how things shook out or whatnot, But how you

0:06:07.040 --> 0:06:10.320
<v Speaker 4>were going to attack Indiana defensively is dramatically different. Miami

0:06:10.360 --> 0:06:13.360
<v Speaker 4>had two week spots that you could pick at consistently

0:06:13.440 --> 0:06:17.840
<v Speaker 4>and Tyler Herro and kelll where I you know, Indiana

0:06:18.040 --> 0:06:20.560
<v Speaker 4>actually has a point guard, and not only a point guard,

0:06:20.640 --> 0:06:22.960
<v Speaker 4>one of the best playmakers that we've really seen in

0:06:23.000 --> 0:06:26.599
<v Speaker 4>Tyrese Halburn. Well, Miami didn't have a point guard, and

0:06:26.800 --> 0:06:29.640
<v Speaker 4>I think that changes how those three pointers get generated

0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:32.600
<v Speaker 4>in such a dramatic way. I just think it's going

0:06:32.680 --> 0:06:35.839
<v Speaker 4>to be so different for both teams from what they

0:06:35.920 --> 0:06:37.119
<v Speaker 4>were playing in the first round.

0:06:37.560 --> 0:06:40.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Tony, what like, oh, go ahead, Carter go I

0:06:40.560 --> 0:06:44.440
<v Speaker 2>was gonna ask you to the point about Indiana's defense

0:06:44.680 --> 0:06:47.400
<v Speaker 2>not having a tremendous amount of weak points. How many

0:06:47.400 --> 0:06:50.000
<v Speaker 2>times do you think that Cleveland Cavaliers scored less than

0:06:50.000 --> 0:06:52.520
<v Speaker 2>one hundred points this regular season? Well?

0:06:52.760 --> 0:06:54.359
<v Speaker 1>I was actually going to bring that up earlier, but

0:06:54.440 --> 0:06:56.240
<v Speaker 1>wasn't sure if it made sense. We were talking about

0:06:56.240 --> 0:06:58.039
<v Speaker 1>if the regular season mattered at all, Like, wasn't that

0:06:58.080 --> 0:07:00.920
<v Speaker 1>their worst game by far offensive? Was that that.

0:07:00.880 --> 0:07:04.279
<v Speaker 2>First had one game under one hundred points and it

0:07:04.360 --> 0:07:06.440
<v Speaker 2>was against your Indiana facers, And I'm not.

0:07:07.560 --> 0:07:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Like I remember the Pacers defending pretty well in that game,

0:07:10.080 --> 0:07:11.640
<v Speaker 1>but not so well that it's like, oh, yeah, they

0:07:11.680 --> 0:07:14.520
<v Speaker 1>should have completely shut down one of the best offenses

0:07:14.520 --> 0:07:15.040
<v Speaker 1>in the had.

0:07:14.960 --> 0:07:15.840
<v Speaker 2>A bad shooting game.

0:07:16.000 --> 0:07:18.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, sure, but it was such a wonky game because

0:07:19.120 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 4>you know, the Caves were up at half, Halliburn's out,

0:07:22.760 --> 0:07:25.040
<v Speaker 4>the Calves go up by sixteen, and I think they

0:07:25.080 --> 0:07:27.320
<v Speaker 4>just took their foot off the gas, like I think

0:07:27.320 --> 0:07:29.480
<v Speaker 4>they were riding like a fifteen game winning streak at

0:07:29.480 --> 0:07:33.000
<v Speaker 4>that point, and you know, they're up sixteen, Haliburn's not playing,

0:07:33.120 --> 0:07:36.040
<v Speaker 4>and then Indy just goes full court press. The Calves

0:07:36.360 --> 0:07:38.680
<v Speaker 4>blow not only you know, blow the lead, they end

0:07:38.800 --> 0:07:41.520
<v Speaker 4>up getting blown out. It was a massive, massive swing

0:07:41.600 --> 0:07:45.800
<v Speaker 4>in the last you know, eighteen minutes of that game. Obviously,

0:07:46.040 --> 0:07:49.240
<v Speaker 4>as I said, Max Struz was working his way back

0:07:49.280 --> 0:07:52.520
<v Speaker 4>No Ty Jerome in that game, and then they played

0:07:52.520 --> 0:07:55.080
<v Speaker 4>the following game, no Haliburn for that one. So we

0:07:55.240 --> 0:07:58.760
<v Speaker 4>really don't have a lot of useful data in this series. Obviously,

0:07:59.080 --> 0:08:03.280
<v Speaker 4>DeAndre Hunter hasn't played against Indiana at all either, so

0:08:03.720 --> 0:08:06.960
<v Speaker 4>we're kind of flying blind. But I do find it

0:08:07.000 --> 0:08:08.920
<v Speaker 4>interesting because I do think that these are teams that

0:08:09.000 --> 0:08:12.200
<v Speaker 4>do play similar styles at least to some extent.

0:08:12.840 --> 0:08:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the shock to the system thing is going to

0:08:14.640 --> 0:08:18.160
<v Speaker 1>be fascinating. Like you if you look at full season stats,

0:08:18.440 --> 0:08:20.400
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna like miss a little bit of the boat

0:08:20.440 --> 0:08:22.760
<v Speaker 1>with the Pacers just because they started so bad, like

0:08:22.800 --> 0:08:26.160
<v Speaker 1>they were nine and fourteen and not like doomsday bad,

0:08:26.240 --> 0:08:28.800
<v Speaker 1>but they like couldn't score against the nets and they

0:08:28.840 --> 0:08:31.600
<v Speaker 1>couldn't stop the Hornets and like lost, like all these

0:08:31.680 --> 0:08:33.400
<v Speaker 1>terrible teams are. It's like, man, these guys are just

0:08:33.400 --> 0:08:36.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna be the ten seed the whole season. And they've

0:08:36.040 --> 0:08:37.800
<v Speaker 1>had like the fourth best record in the NBA since

0:08:37.840 --> 0:08:39.959
<v Speaker 1>the NBA Cup and a lot of their numbers since then,

0:08:40.040 --> 0:08:43.040
<v Speaker 1>particularly on defense, are much better. And that's how they

0:08:43.080 --> 0:08:45.640
<v Speaker 1>got to be an actually above average defense this year

0:08:45.679 --> 0:08:47.840
<v Speaker 1>is because of the rise they had. Then they had

0:08:47.880 --> 0:08:50.040
<v Speaker 1>practice time, they got better and jn Nemhard returned that

0:08:50.120 --> 0:08:53.440
<v Speaker 1>obviously alone would have boosted things. Ben Shepherd returned right after.

0:08:53.880 --> 0:08:56.960
<v Speaker 1>So that's a big part of it. But you know,

0:08:57.040 --> 0:08:58.839
<v Speaker 1>the weak points part, and I think that's become a

0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:00.960
<v Speaker 1>theme that people have written about for this playoffs is

0:09:00.960 --> 0:09:03.000
<v Speaker 1>like teams love to attack weak points. That's almost as

0:09:03.000 --> 0:09:05.280
<v Speaker 1>important as like the star parts of the battle, like

0:09:05.480 --> 0:09:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Alberton's been getting picked on at times in the postseason,

0:09:08.160 --> 0:09:10.400
<v Speaker 1>Like he even talked about himself not being the greatest

0:09:10.400 --> 0:09:12.840
<v Speaker 1>defender after their Game five win, right, Like it is

0:09:12.920 --> 0:09:15.079
<v Speaker 1>part of what he knows himself to be, which is

0:09:15.120 --> 0:09:16.920
<v Speaker 1>part of it. He's a good team defender, Like he's

0:09:17.200 --> 0:09:19.200
<v Speaker 1>very aware of what's going on. But you know, they

0:09:19.440 --> 0:09:21.800
<v Speaker 1>they have been very good in spite of that. They

0:09:21.800 --> 0:09:23.760
<v Speaker 1>have all had a lot of guys get better defensively.

0:09:24.440 --> 0:09:27.040
<v Speaker 1>But I think that that will be where the Pacers

0:09:27.080 --> 0:09:28.559
<v Speaker 1>have to figure out, Like, Okay, if we're not gonna

0:09:28.600 --> 0:09:30.880
<v Speaker 1>get run off the floor by Calves team that had

0:09:30.920 --> 0:09:33.600
<v Speaker 1>a one thirty plus offensive rating at the first rowd,

0:09:33.880 --> 0:09:36.200
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna have to figure out where to put tyres

0:09:36.240 --> 0:09:38.240
<v Speaker 1>Alburton had to defend on a string for forty eight minutes,

0:09:38.240 --> 0:09:40.319
<v Speaker 1>because I mean, it's happened to every team, right, I'm

0:09:40.320 --> 0:09:42.280
<v Speaker 1>not breaking a news by talking about Cavalanche, just but like,

0:09:42.360 --> 0:09:44.880
<v Speaker 1>you mess up for three minutes of defense, you're down fifteen,

0:09:44.960 --> 0:09:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Like you just can't do it.

0:09:47.000 --> 0:09:50.520
<v Speaker 2>Is that where if as a as a on the

0:09:50.559 --> 0:09:53.200
<v Speaker 2>Pacers side of the ledger, is that where you're the

0:09:53.280 --> 0:09:58.200
<v Speaker 2>most concerned just their ability to hang offensively with the

0:09:58.240 --> 0:10:02.720
<v Speaker 2>Calves or you know, is it or do you have

0:10:03.000 --> 0:10:07.000
<v Speaker 2>similar concerns in the defensive end in terms of, you know,

0:10:07.440 --> 0:10:10.800
<v Speaker 2>the offense being able to get going against obviously this

0:10:11.240 --> 0:10:13.880
<v Speaker 2>super potent front line in Mobley and Allen.

0:10:14.440 --> 0:10:16.400
<v Speaker 1>I think the Caves defense is very good and the

0:10:16.480 --> 0:10:19.160
<v Speaker 1>size is gonna matter against the Pacers. This is not

0:10:19.200 --> 0:10:21.920
<v Speaker 1>to discredit the Calves, but if they stop the Pacers

0:10:21.960 --> 0:10:23.480
<v Speaker 1>for an entire series, they'll be the first team to

0:10:23.520 --> 0:10:25.720
<v Speaker 1>do it, you know, in the Halberd and Carlisle kind

0:10:25.760 --> 0:10:27.520
<v Speaker 1>of era. I am worried about the other end of

0:10:27.520 --> 0:10:31.480
<v Speaker 1>the four way more than that, Like the Calves had

0:10:31.559 --> 0:10:33.120
<v Speaker 1>could have had as many as four all stars, Like

0:10:33.120 --> 0:10:35.880
<v Speaker 1>they had that many guys who were worthy, and like

0:10:36.000 --> 0:10:38.959
<v Speaker 1>their weakest of those guys just shot what seventy five

0:10:38.960 --> 0:10:40.880
<v Speaker 1>percent for a whole series and like just dunked all

0:10:40.920 --> 0:10:41.679
<v Speaker 1>over people.

0:10:41.440 --> 0:10:44.880
<v Speaker 2>For more steals than missus. Yeah against the Miami Yeah right.

0:10:44.920 --> 0:10:46.839
<v Speaker 1>And you know, for all the things mouse Turner is

0:10:46.840 --> 0:10:48.920
<v Speaker 1>good at, like if you take one step away from

0:10:49.000 --> 0:10:51.319
<v Speaker 1>Jared Allen because someone else on your team got beat, okay,

0:10:51.360 --> 0:10:52.959
<v Speaker 1>the boss is over your head and in the basket,

0:10:53.400 --> 0:10:57.280
<v Speaker 1>so and the rebounding battle has very much skewed towards

0:10:57.280 --> 0:10:59.920
<v Speaker 1>the fro in those Texas on Texas battles down low.

0:11:00.120 --> 0:11:03.760
<v Speaker 1>So I think if the Pacers can guard a little bit,

0:11:03.840 --> 0:11:05.480
<v Speaker 1>that will help a lot, because I think they'll be

0:11:05.480 --> 0:11:08.880
<v Speaker 1>able to score enough, but getting stops will be quite

0:11:08.960 --> 0:11:10.720
<v Speaker 1>the chore I think for them, and that that's true

0:11:10.720 --> 0:11:12.440
<v Speaker 1>of everybody against the Cavs. Just ask the he we

0:11:12.520 --> 0:11:14.600
<v Speaker 1>just saw it. But you know, there's a lot of

0:11:14.600 --> 0:11:16.640
<v Speaker 1>particulars that make me think the defense will be the

0:11:16.679 --> 0:11:17.400
<v Speaker 1>story of the series.

0:11:17.640 --> 0:11:20.120
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and both teams are very similar in terms of

0:11:20.240 --> 0:11:24.040
<v Speaker 4>how they perform offensively in transition. Both teams are in

0:11:24.040 --> 0:11:26.959
<v Speaker 4>the top five in terms of transition offense. Both are

0:11:27.120 --> 0:11:32.360
<v Speaker 4>you know, cas are eleventh in transition defense, Indy's fourteenth.

0:11:32.400 --> 0:11:34.680
<v Speaker 4>Half court offense, both of these teams are great. Indy

0:11:34.800 --> 0:11:36.959
<v Speaker 4>sixth and half court offense, Caves are number one, and

0:11:37.040 --> 0:11:39.560
<v Speaker 4>half court offense. Half court defense is where there's a

0:11:39.559 --> 0:11:44.680
<v Speaker 4>bit of a difference. Caves are fifth, while Indiana is sixteenth.

0:11:44.840 --> 0:11:47.679
<v Speaker 4>I want to get your perspective on the you know,

0:11:48.120 --> 0:11:52.280
<v Speaker 4>defensive strength of Indiana's front court because you know, Miles

0:11:52.280 --> 0:11:55.880
<v Speaker 4>Turner and Pascal Siakam definitely had reputations of being very

0:11:55.880 --> 0:11:59.200
<v Speaker 4>strong defenders. It hasn't felt like they've been as good

0:11:59.200 --> 0:12:02.240
<v Speaker 4>this year, but maybe you know, some of that is

0:12:02.320 --> 0:12:05.440
<v Speaker 4>skewed by me watching more early season matchups. How do

0:12:05.520 --> 0:12:08.760
<v Speaker 4>you feel about them defensively and how they matchup in

0:12:08.800 --> 0:12:11.840
<v Speaker 4>particular with the Kavs Biggs, because I really do feel

0:12:12.080 --> 0:12:16.560
<v Speaker 4>that Mobley and Allen versus Siaka and Turner matchup is

0:12:16.600 --> 0:12:18.199
<v Speaker 4>going to be one of the most important parts of

0:12:18.240 --> 0:12:18.760
<v Speaker 4>this series.

0:12:19.200 --> 0:12:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, a lot of stuff that Turner got better at

0:12:21.280 --> 0:12:23.040
<v Speaker 1>is the season on a long defensively because ever like

0:12:23.040 --> 0:12:24.720
<v Speaker 1>he was top five defensive player of the Year twice,

0:12:24.760 --> 0:12:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Like he's yeah, at one point was a game wrecker

0:12:27.160 --> 0:12:29.080
<v Speaker 1>on that end of the floor. I think he's still

0:12:29.160 --> 0:12:30.840
<v Speaker 1>leading the playoffs and Blacks, which if he does again

0:12:31.040 --> 0:12:33.480
<v Speaker 1>be the second time of his career. You know, he

0:12:33.760 --> 0:12:37.040
<v Speaker 1>he's still talented on that end. Like when they were struggling,

0:12:37.480 --> 0:12:39.880
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't really like he looked worse, but it wasn't

0:12:39.920 --> 0:12:42.920
<v Speaker 1>necessarily his fault. That the whole game he's being asked

0:12:42.920 --> 0:12:45.959
<v Speaker 1>to cover for someone else who got beat on the perimeter.

0:12:46.000 --> 0:12:47.760
<v Speaker 1>It's like Miles Turner step over and side at the rim.

0:12:47.760 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Are they're gonna score and and you know you don't.

0:12:50.800 --> 0:12:52.200
<v Speaker 1>You don't want to have to use the mouse trap

0:12:52.240 --> 0:12:54.560
<v Speaker 1>that much. You should just eradicate the mice right, Like

0:12:55.080 --> 0:12:57.440
<v Speaker 1>he's very good, but they didn't. But this season he

0:12:57.520 --> 0:13:00.240
<v Speaker 1>got a lot better like two man game synergy, I

0:13:00.240 --> 0:13:02.640
<v Speaker 1>would say, especially with the Pacers good defenders, like defending

0:13:02.679 --> 0:13:04.160
<v Speaker 1>pick and rolls with them, Hard and Nee Smith have

0:13:04.240 --> 0:13:06.280
<v Speaker 1>looked a lot better. They've been able to mix in

0:13:06.679 --> 0:13:08.800
<v Speaker 1>coverages a little differently in a way that place the

0:13:08.880 --> 0:13:11.800
<v Speaker 1>turner strengths and naturally help their defense. And yeah, Siakam

0:13:11.880 --> 0:13:13.920
<v Speaker 1>last year and even at times really this year was

0:13:14.360 --> 0:13:16.400
<v Speaker 1>a little flimsier than his rep on defense, but like

0:13:17.200 --> 0:13:20.680
<v Speaker 1>there is not a bigger switch in scheme than going

0:13:20.679 --> 0:13:23.800
<v Speaker 1>from Nick Nurse Toronto Raptors style and he planned for

0:13:23.880 --> 0:13:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Darko the last year, but still to the Pacers, right,

0:13:26.840 --> 0:13:30.160
<v Speaker 1>so there's new terminology. You're doing way different things naturally,

0:13:30.440 --> 0:13:33.120
<v Speaker 1>and he's gotten much better as the season has progressed.

0:13:33.640 --> 0:13:37.559
<v Speaker 1>So they they're two most sizeable players they play, are

0:13:37.640 --> 0:13:42.160
<v Speaker 1>good defenders, they're reserve frontcour guys certainly have some weaknesses

0:13:42.200 --> 0:13:45.280
<v Speaker 1>in Thomas Bryant, Obi Topping, like they played those guys

0:13:45.280 --> 0:13:47.120
<v Speaker 1>mostly out of like, hey, we have six fouls for you,

0:13:47.120 --> 0:13:49.880
<v Speaker 1>honest and necessity in the first round. Top it's been

0:13:49.880 --> 0:13:52.079
<v Speaker 1>a good playoff performer before Jaris Walker will hit the

0:13:52.120 --> 0:13:54.960
<v Speaker 1>floor certainly, and he has a nice defensive reputation. But

0:13:55.400 --> 0:13:58.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Siakam and Turner's growth on that end

0:13:58.080 --> 0:13:59.240
<v Speaker 1>of the four is actually a big part of the

0:13:59.240 --> 0:14:02.079
<v Speaker 1>Pacers turnaround, because you are right that they have at

0:14:02.080 --> 0:14:03.960
<v Speaker 1>times looked like they'd taken a step back on that end,

0:14:03.960 --> 0:14:06.120
<v Speaker 1>but they needed them to be better to save their

0:14:06.160 --> 0:14:07.000
<v Speaker 1>season and they have been.

0:14:07.640 --> 0:14:11.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, something I'm really really interested in is what kind

0:14:12.040 --> 0:14:15.240
<v Speaker 2>of scheme Carlisle comes out of the gate with in

0:14:15.320 --> 0:14:18.760
<v Speaker 2>how they guard the pick and roll. Like the Calves

0:14:18.880 --> 0:14:22.520
<v Speaker 2>were pretty like they kind of deviated from their regular

0:14:22.560 --> 0:14:26.080
<v Speaker 2>season in the sense that they really did go hunt

0:14:26.160 --> 0:14:29.600
<v Speaker 2>Tyler Hero. You know, they kind of in my opinion,

0:14:29.760 --> 0:14:31.760
<v Speaker 2>justin feel free to disagree, they were kind of a

0:14:31.760 --> 0:14:33.560
<v Speaker 2>team like we're just going to keep running our stuff

0:14:33.640 --> 0:14:36.480
<v Speaker 2>until you break. They weren't like mismatch hunters. They're not

0:14:36.560 --> 0:14:39.400
<v Speaker 2>like the Celtics, but in that heat series, they really

0:14:39.440 --> 0:14:42.640
<v Speaker 2>did pick at the scab of Tyler Hero before they

0:14:42.680 --> 0:14:46.560
<v Speaker 2>decided to pick at another scab of kilol Ware in

0:14:46.600 --> 0:14:47.400
<v Speaker 2>the games in Miami.

0:14:47.480 --> 0:14:49.320
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of slander for an Indiana hoosier.

0:14:49.360 --> 0:14:53.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm very upset, I know, I know, but but you know,

0:14:53.600 --> 0:14:55.360
<v Speaker 2>so they kind of did they kind of did that.

0:14:55.400 --> 0:14:58.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to imagine they're going to do the same

0:14:58.280 --> 0:15:02.000
<v Speaker 2>thing with Halliburton. And if they're able to get that switch,

0:15:02.720 --> 0:15:06.360
<v Speaker 2>how do you think that Indy's gonna play that? Because

0:15:07.040 --> 0:15:11.000
<v Speaker 2>switching feels really dangerous for Halliburton, Like, I don't think

0:15:11.000 --> 0:15:13.720
<v Speaker 2>you want him trying to like wrestle Jarrett or Evan

0:15:13.800 --> 0:15:17.120
<v Speaker 2>in the post over and over and over again. You know,

0:15:17.320 --> 0:15:20.880
<v Speaker 2>at a drop is what I think, you know, I got,

0:15:20.920 --> 0:15:24.000
<v Speaker 2>like Turner is most comfortable with. But like good luck

0:15:24.120 --> 0:15:27.120
<v Speaker 2>Mobley and Darius, I'm sorry, Donovan and Darius are like

0:15:27.120 --> 0:15:30.440
<v Speaker 2>two of the best drop that can drop defense attackers

0:15:30.440 --> 0:15:33.040
<v Speaker 2>in the NBA. Like what do you think they will

0:15:33.080 --> 0:15:35.040
<v Speaker 2>do versus what they should do?

0:15:35.640 --> 0:15:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's fascinating, Like the first round gave us no

0:15:38.240 --> 0:15:41.080
<v Speaker 1>indication because the whole defensive plan is like okay, Yannis,

0:15:41.120 --> 0:15:43.640
<v Speaker 1>step is step one, two and three and maybe even

0:15:43.640 --> 0:15:45.600
<v Speaker 1>four and then everybody else figure that out later, right,

0:15:46.000 --> 0:15:48.960
<v Speaker 1>And last year they had Brunson and the rest of

0:15:48.960 --> 0:15:50.400
<v Speaker 1>the Knicks who like were you know, this is the

0:15:50.400 --> 0:15:54.120
<v Speaker 1>most like potent team offense they'll have played in this

0:15:54.200 --> 0:15:55.800
<v Speaker 1>era of their team that they'll have to kind of

0:15:55.840 --> 0:15:57.720
<v Speaker 1>sort of stuff out because it's very easy for me to say,

0:15:58.040 --> 0:16:01.000
<v Speaker 1>I bet Halburn starts the game on Max Streus, Right, Okay,

0:16:01.000 --> 0:16:02.920
<v Speaker 1>that's great. Max Struce goes and sets a screen to

0:16:02.920 --> 0:16:05.320
<v Speaker 1>start a possession, and now, what, like, are you just

0:16:05.480 --> 0:16:07.560
<v Speaker 1>giving something up? Is Streut's just gonna be wide open

0:16:07.600 --> 0:16:09.840
<v Speaker 1>for a three immediately? Gary Trentce just made a trillion

0:16:09.880 --> 0:16:11.560
<v Speaker 1>three's against the Pacers in the first round, right, Like,

0:16:11.600 --> 0:16:14.840
<v Speaker 1>it's not that obviously helps like sometimes, but it's not

0:16:14.920 --> 0:16:17.640
<v Speaker 1>that simple, and he's going to get caught in tradition

0:16:17.640 --> 0:16:20.480
<v Speaker 1>opportunities because of a strue screen whatever in those matchups.

0:16:20.520 --> 0:16:23.600
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I'd imagine they send Turner up higher because

0:16:23.680 --> 0:16:25.400
<v Speaker 1>of that. Try to get those guards to have to

0:16:25.440 --> 0:16:27.680
<v Speaker 1>turn the corner or see another body or just give

0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:30.200
<v Speaker 1>them off time to scram and have the big man

0:16:30.280 --> 0:16:32.520
<v Speaker 1>get back. But hey, good luck, Like that's hard. Everybody

0:16:32.560 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 1>has tried this, Like if I can think of it

0:16:33.920 --> 0:16:35.720
<v Speaker 1>obviously and it be a coach can think of it right,

0:16:36.000 --> 0:16:38.360
<v Speaker 1>so maybe someone's coming from the weak side to tagd

0:16:38.360 --> 0:16:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Allan come in to the basket. Oh look, Donovan Mitchell

0:16:40.560 --> 0:16:42.440
<v Speaker 1>has become a better passer this year. Darris Carlan's an

0:16:42.440 --> 0:16:44.320
<v Speaker 1>awesome passer. They'll just throw this skit pass over the top,

0:16:44.400 --> 0:16:48.680
<v Speaker 1>like they're gonna have to be really connected, which is

0:16:48.720 --> 0:16:51.880
<v Speaker 1>like everybody's favorite buzzword for just not messing up basically

0:16:51.920 --> 0:16:54.320
<v Speaker 1>when you're rotating, And that's where the Bucks fell apart

0:16:54.320 --> 0:16:57.240
<v Speaker 1>against the Pacers, right, they would stop the first action

0:16:57.280 --> 0:16:58.640
<v Speaker 1>and the second one and the third one. They were like,

0:16:58.680 --> 0:17:00.320
<v Speaker 1>oh crap, we don't know what to do. I'm not

0:17:00.440 --> 0:17:03.560
<v Speaker 1>ready for whatever this is. And if the Pacers can't

0:17:03.560 --> 0:17:06.520
<v Speaker 1>have that, But the Calves force you to mess up

0:17:06.520 --> 0:17:08.840
<v Speaker 1>because they have a lot of good players. So you know,

0:17:08.840 --> 0:17:11.840
<v Speaker 1>if you involve Albert in the action, which I imagine they'll try,

0:17:11.960 --> 0:17:15.400
<v Speaker 1>or if you just keep running whatever the Calves want

0:17:15.400 --> 0:17:17.840
<v Speaker 1>to run with their two all star level ball handlers, Yeah,

0:17:17.840 --> 0:17:19.720
<v Speaker 1>they're going to generate good shots like a lot, and

0:17:19.760 --> 0:17:22.280
<v Speaker 1>so the Pacers can't have these breakdowns, so they're just

0:17:22.359 --> 0:17:23.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna get run out of the gym.

0:17:23.359 --> 0:17:26.040
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes it does feel sorry justin I'll toss to you

0:17:26.040 --> 0:17:29.199
<v Speaker 2>in just one second. It does feel like they you know,

0:17:29.640 --> 0:17:34.040
<v Speaker 2>there are when you're coaching up a playoff defense, like

0:17:34.080 --> 0:17:36.480
<v Speaker 2>you kind of are on one end. There are two

0:17:36.720 --> 0:17:40.080
<v Speaker 2>ends of the spectrum. One end is simplify, so no

0:17:40.119 --> 0:17:43.560
<v Speaker 2>one messes up, but like you know, talent will kill

0:17:43.600 --> 0:17:49.600
<v Speaker 2>you or go way complicated, really rely on a lot

0:17:49.640 --> 0:17:54.719
<v Speaker 2>of crazy rotation, high effort, high focus things, and like

0:17:54.960 --> 0:17:58.560
<v Speaker 2>your ceiling might go up, but your floor goes way down.

0:17:59.119 --> 0:18:01.720
<v Speaker 2>It does feel like Andy has to lean towards the

0:18:01.840 --> 0:18:04.640
<v Speaker 2>ladder end of the spectrum and just depend on their

0:18:04.680 --> 0:18:06.639
<v Speaker 2>guys to not screw up.

0:18:06.800 --> 0:18:09.560
<v Speaker 1>And also like they just played honest like more complex

0:18:10.200 --> 0:18:12.400
<v Speaker 1>mess if you if you mess up something complex, it's

0:18:12.440 --> 0:18:14.480
<v Speaker 1>like it looks so bad, like there's like a wide

0:18:14.520 --> 0:18:16.800
<v Speaker 1>open path to the basket. And I think they did

0:18:16.840 --> 0:18:19.280
<v Speaker 1>a really good job with their on a scheme, but

0:18:19.320 --> 0:18:21.600
<v Speaker 1>there were just some moments where like, oh, so obviously

0:18:21.640 --> 0:18:24.120
<v Speaker 1>somebody just messed up like that that's the best player

0:18:24.119 --> 0:18:26.240
<v Speaker 1>in the series walking into the rim. So that's where

0:18:26.280 --> 0:18:28.919
<v Speaker 1>the complicated parts come in, is like one guy messing

0:18:29.000 --> 0:18:30.840
<v Speaker 1>up causes that basically everybody too.

0:18:31.560 --> 0:18:34.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's gonna be really interesting to see kind of

0:18:34.560 --> 0:18:37.679
<v Speaker 4>how both teams attack one another to start off the series.

0:18:38.040 --> 0:18:41.119
<v Speaker 4>Carter mentioned that the Cavs did, you know, go hunting

0:18:41.280 --> 0:18:43.240
<v Speaker 4>a little bit more than we saw in the regular season.

0:18:43.280 --> 0:18:46.679
<v Speaker 4>And the interesting thing about that is they don't go to,

0:18:47.040 --> 0:18:50.000
<v Speaker 4>you know, hunt out a weak defender in isolation. It's hey,

0:18:50.000 --> 0:18:52.400
<v Speaker 4>we're gonna run you know, a double drag here with

0:18:52.680 --> 0:18:55.440
<v Speaker 4>you know, Max Strus, which I assume Haliburn's going to

0:18:55.480 --> 0:18:58.680
<v Speaker 4>start on him one of the bigs, and we're going

0:18:58.720 --> 0:19:01.400
<v Speaker 4>to count on this flowing into a pick and roll.

0:19:01.560 --> 0:19:03.560
<v Speaker 4>We're going to be able to generate good looks here.

0:19:03.800 --> 0:19:06.480
<v Speaker 4>It's not just about attacking you individually as a defender.

0:19:06.560 --> 0:19:10.040
<v Speaker 4>It's about causing the defense to break down. And one

0:19:10.080 --> 0:19:12.439
<v Speaker 4>of the things I'm curious about is how you anticipate

0:19:12.520 --> 0:19:16.439
<v Speaker 4>Indiana attacking the Cavs defense to start because obviously, you know,

0:19:16.560 --> 0:19:19.040
<v Speaker 4>the pick and roll, pick and pop game has been

0:19:19.080 --> 0:19:21.639
<v Speaker 4>a big part of the Pacers offense. Where do you

0:19:21.720 --> 0:19:24.760
<v Speaker 4>see them targeting the Cavs on the offensive end.

0:19:25.160 --> 0:19:27.239
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's funny you talk about the Calves going kind

0:19:27.240 --> 0:19:29.640
<v Speaker 1>of against their style by mismatch hunting, because the Pacers

0:19:29.680 --> 0:19:31.920
<v Speaker 1>never do it either, right, Like that was what struck

0:19:31.960 --> 0:19:33.280
<v Speaker 1>struck me at the end of game five of the

0:19:33.359 --> 0:19:35.320
<v Speaker 1>game they just played against the Bucks a couple days ago.

0:19:35.400 --> 0:19:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Like late in the game, they very often were just oh,

0:19:38.560 --> 0:19:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Siakam has a small on them, and they would dump

0:19:40.119 --> 0:19:41.720
<v Speaker 1>it into him like they never play like that. And

0:19:41.760 --> 0:19:43.760
<v Speaker 1>I kept thinking, Man, if they lose, it's gonna be

0:19:43.800 --> 0:19:47.840
<v Speaker 1>to me because they were so focused on like mismatch hunting.

0:19:47.880 --> 0:19:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Guess what it works, SACOM's really good. They won the game,

0:19:50.840 --> 0:19:53.920
<v Speaker 1>but you know, it doesn't feel like that's how they're

0:19:53.960 --> 0:19:56.399
<v Speaker 1>at their best. And they're just hard to prep for,

0:19:56.600 --> 0:19:59.360
<v Speaker 1>right because they what they say it's random, Like it's

0:19:59.359 --> 0:20:02.080
<v Speaker 1>easy to call it random, it's not to them, right.

0:20:02.119 --> 0:20:03.720
<v Speaker 1>They know what to do, They know how to flow

0:20:03.760 --> 0:20:06.920
<v Speaker 1>from action to action. The ball never sticks side to side,

0:20:06.920 --> 0:20:09.720
<v Speaker 1>big Man's the full crumb. It's flipping around. Sometimes that's

0:20:09.760 --> 0:20:13.080
<v Speaker 1>picking roll. Sometimes that's dribble, handoff. Sometimes that's just there's

0:20:13.080 --> 0:20:14.639
<v Speaker 1>not a lot off ball screening, whatever you want to

0:20:14.720 --> 0:20:17.040
<v Speaker 1>call it. It's like it's random to us, it's not

0:20:17.160 --> 0:20:19.040
<v Speaker 1>random to them. The only reason I say that is

0:20:19.040 --> 0:20:20.840
<v Speaker 1>because there's not like a bread and butter like one

0:20:20.960 --> 0:20:23.800
<v Speaker 1>action outside of crunch time when it's like, yes, Yahkam's

0:20:23.800 --> 0:20:26.919
<v Speaker 1>sending a flatball screen for Tyres Alburn that they're gonna do.

0:20:27.040 --> 0:20:29.280
<v Speaker 1>That's gonna crush a team over and over and over again.

0:20:29.320 --> 0:20:33.119
<v Speaker 1>It's just because it's so hard to scout or like

0:20:33.240 --> 0:20:36.639
<v Speaker 1>know what's coming. That's what their secret sauce is. Like

0:20:36.720 --> 0:20:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Joe Miszula said last year the Pacers got swept by

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:42.080
<v Speaker 1>the Celtics, right handled handled in a four l series,

0:20:42.160 --> 0:20:44.240
<v Speaker 1>and Joe Mozula said, that was our hardest series, Like

0:20:44.320 --> 0:20:46.160
<v Speaker 1>that was the hardest series we played to prep for

0:20:46.480 --> 0:20:49.400
<v Speaker 1>and be ready for because they just stress you out

0:20:49.440 --> 0:20:51.280
<v Speaker 1>in so many ways that you have to be locked

0:20:51.280 --> 0:20:53.160
<v Speaker 1>in for forty eight minutes defensive here they're gonna score

0:20:53.200 --> 0:20:55.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot. And the PACER's issuing in that series wasn't

0:20:55.080 --> 0:20:56.560
<v Speaker 1>that they didn't score. They scored a lot. They just

0:20:56.560 --> 0:20:59.320
<v Speaker 1>couldn't stop the Boston Celtics wit, the best offensive all time.

0:20:59.640 --> 0:21:03.400
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know, necessarily there's a oh, they're gonna

0:21:03.640 --> 0:21:07.320
<v Speaker 1>pull Darius Garland into every action and try to, you know,

0:21:07.359 --> 0:21:09.199
<v Speaker 1>make him defend a screener or make him defend a

0:21:09.200 --> 0:21:12.600
<v Speaker 1>ball handler like the Pacers ball handlers, the Smith, them Hart,

0:21:12.640 --> 0:21:16.360
<v Speaker 1>everybody has gotten so much better at attacking when they

0:21:16.400 --> 0:21:18.760
<v Speaker 1>get by man or you know, taking space in front

0:21:18.800 --> 0:21:20.399
<v Speaker 1>of them to make a defense rotate and they can

0:21:20.400 --> 0:21:22.680
<v Speaker 1>all make enough shots. Now that the Pacers will just

0:21:22.680 --> 0:21:24.560
<v Speaker 1>trust anybody to do anything. They didn't have a single

0:21:24.600 --> 0:21:26.639
<v Speaker 1>thirty point score in a single game in the first round, right,

0:21:26.640 --> 0:21:28.840
<v Speaker 1>They just go from thing to thing and whoever it

0:21:28.920 --> 0:21:30.840
<v Speaker 1>is can score. All those guys have grown in ways

0:21:30.880 --> 0:21:33.800
<v Speaker 1>to make the system work. So it's not they have

0:21:33.880 --> 0:21:35.480
<v Speaker 1>not been as much of a pick on the weak

0:21:35.520 --> 0:21:37.760
<v Speaker 1>point thing. It's not that they're not doing that, but

0:21:38.000 --> 0:21:40.159
<v Speaker 1>they just trust everybody to score and they have the

0:21:40.200 --> 0:21:42.400
<v Speaker 1>depth to do it. So that that was a very

0:21:42.400 --> 0:21:45.320
<v Speaker 1>long winded, non specific answer to say they're not gonna

0:21:45.359 --> 0:21:48.280
<v Speaker 1>attack anything specific. They're not just gonna have this like,

0:21:48.359 --> 0:21:50.480
<v Speaker 1>oh my gosh, the Calves can't stop this one thing.

0:21:50.560 --> 0:21:53.359
<v Speaker 1>They're just the way they play, that's it. That is

0:21:53.400 --> 0:21:54.639
<v Speaker 1>their stress around defenses.

0:21:54.800 --> 0:21:56.640
<v Speaker 4>And that's one of the benefits of having so many

0:21:56.720 --> 0:21:59.000
<v Speaker 4>high IQ players out there, right, Like they were able

0:21:59.040 --> 0:22:02.359
<v Speaker 4>to read and react and see, you know, what's available

0:22:02.400 --> 0:22:04.160
<v Speaker 4>to them where they are able to put in their

0:22:04.160 --> 0:22:07.280
<v Speaker 4>best work, just like zoom Ai Companion helps us out, Carter,

0:22:07.359 --> 0:22:08.400
<v Speaker 4>don't you dare shake your head.

0:22:08.440 --> 0:22:09.880
<v Speaker 2>Only you can do your best work there.

0:22:09.960 --> 0:22:12.680
<v Speaker 4>Zuomei Companion can help you do the rest, like automatically

0:22:12.680 --> 0:22:15.199
<v Speaker 4>taking notes, answering meeting questions, and helping you respond to

0:22:15.200 --> 0:22:18.600
<v Speaker 4>your coworker. Available no additional cost with eligible paid plans.

0:22:18.680 --> 0:22:21.639
<v Speaker 2>Were cappy. With Zuomei Companion, you can go as one

0:22:21.680 --> 0:22:25.480
<v Speaker 2>of your better disguise. And that's why I was tickled

0:22:25.520 --> 0:22:27.040
<v Speaker 2>by it because I saw it, but I was like,

0:22:27.240 --> 0:22:29.040
<v Speaker 2>but I don't know if anyone else is going to

0:22:29.080 --> 0:22:32.679
<v Speaker 2>see it coming. So very well done, Sarah Tony. I

0:22:32.720 --> 0:22:36.240
<v Speaker 2>actually do have, you know, one very specific thing I'm

0:22:36.280 --> 0:22:40.040
<v Speaker 2>actually really curious about in this series, and it is

0:22:40.280 --> 0:22:43.040
<v Speaker 2>having to do with Pascal Siakam. He is one of

0:22:43.080 --> 0:22:47.800
<v Speaker 2>the very few players that I saw this season that

0:22:47.840 --> 0:22:50.680
<v Speaker 2>the Cavs had a really hard time figuring out how

0:22:50.720 --> 0:22:55.400
<v Speaker 2>to stop. Uh. He is a special blend of chaotic

0:22:56.000 --> 0:23:01.600
<v Speaker 2>that allows him to to to score on our bigs

0:23:01.840 --> 0:23:05.280
<v Speaker 2>in post situations. I wouldn't say that's what you want

0:23:05.280 --> 0:23:07.679
<v Speaker 2>to build the whole plane out of, but like it's not.

0:23:07.880 --> 0:23:09.880
<v Speaker 2>You know, there are a lot of guys who if

0:23:09.880 --> 0:23:12.119
<v Speaker 2>they try to post up Evan or Jarrett, they're just

0:23:12.240 --> 0:23:15.520
<v Speaker 2>dead on arrival, especially if the post starts like twelve

0:23:15.560 --> 0:23:19.600
<v Speaker 2>feet out. Siakam is an exception to that. And also

0:23:20.080 --> 0:23:23.600
<v Speaker 2>I think Siakam is one of the best positioned players

0:23:23.880 --> 0:23:28.719
<v Speaker 2>to punish the Cavaliers switching scheme that they leaned on

0:23:28.800 --> 0:23:32.440
<v Speaker 2>for much of the regular season because of his post acumen,

0:23:32.520 --> 0:23:35.639
<v Speaker 2>because of his handle where you have to put you

0:23:35.800 --> 0:23:38.800
<v Speaker 2>on the ball, and his movements are chaotic enough that

0:23:38.840 --> 0:23:41.119
<v Speaker 2>I think it's hard to double in a way that

0:23:41.200 --> 0:23:45.399
<v Speaker 2>doesn't leave you really exposed. Like timing the double is

0:23:45.480 --> 0:23:50.320
<v Speaker 2>really hard with that kind of chaotic stop start. He's

0:23:50.359 --> 0:23:53.879
<v Speaker 2>like the way Darius Garland is a stop start player

0:23:54.040 --> 0:23:57.560
<v Speaker 2>when he attacks the rim. That's Pascal Siakam post ups.

0:23:57.760 --> 0:24:00.280
<v Speaker 2>I never exactly know when it's going to start, when

0:24:00.320 --> 0:24:02.120
<v Speaker 2>he's going to actually make his move to the rim.

0:24:02.400 --> 0:24:06.159
<v Speaker 2>He's really physical, you know, it's hard for you know,

0:24:06.240 --> 0:24:09.280
<v Speaker 2>guys like you know, Sam Merril Max Strus who can

0:24:09.640 --> 0:24:13.960
<v Speaker 2>hold their own in others switch situations, like if they're

0:24:14.000 --> 0:24:17.240
<v Speaker 2>running pick and pop. I'm totally cool with Max Struce

0:24:17.560 --> 0:24:21.159
<v Speaker 2>taking seven seconds on Miles Turner, you know, like that's fine,

0:24:21.240 --> 0:24:25.119
<v Speaker 2>That's a perfectly acceptable outcome to me. Less so with

0:24:25.160 --> 0:24:28.960
<v Speaker 2>Siakam so I'm interested in two things. One or the

0:24:29.000 --> 0:24:34.000
<v Speaker 2>Cabs going to switch those actions and let Siakam get

0:24:34.240 --> 0:24:37.760
<v Speaker 2>favorable post mismatches. And then the second thing I'm curious

0:24:37.800 --> 0:24:43.040
<v Speaker 2>about in that Calves win early in the season, the

0:24:43.080 --> 0:24:47.280
<v Speaker 2>one without Haliburton, Siakam was murdering them in the first

0:24:47.320 --> 0:24:50.879
<v Speaker 2>half and they went to a two three zone in

0:24:50.920 --> 0:24:54.800
<v Speaker 2>the second half, and I think Siakam got like three

0:24:54.880 --> 0:24:58.520
<v Speaker 2>shot attempts the rest of the game. Do you think

0:24:58.800 --> 0:25:03.440
<v Speaker 2>that that zone is something that the Cavs can maybe

0:25:03.560 --> 0:25:07.400
<v Speaker 2>lean on in this series, knowing how dangerous Indy can

0:25:07.400 --> 0:25:08.560
<v Speaker 2>be shooting the basketball.

0:25:08.720 --> 0:25:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Ah, the zone comvote. Yeah. So first, for just Siakam,

0:25:12.359 --> 0:25:15.199
<v Speaker 1>he's just he's got a good enough three ball this

0:25:15.320 --> 0:25:18.440
<v Speaker 1>year that's actually like a oh crap, we gotta think

0:25:18.440 --> 0:25:21.200
<v Speaker 1>about that kind of shot as a defense. And he's

0:25:21.240 --> 0:25:24.920
<v Speaker 1>always been money from elbows and in right, like effective

0:25:25.000 --> 0:25:27.840
<v Speaker 1>enough that you're on him there. And so because of

0:25:27.880 --> 0:25:30.280
<v Speaker 1>those two things, you're always sticking to him. And he's

0:25:30.280 --> 0:25:32.359
<v Speaker 1>got a lot of craft right, he can go, he's

0:25:32.359 --> 0:25:33.960
<v Speaker 1>gotten up and under. He hit one on the honest

0:25:34.000 --> 0:25:35.000
<v Speaker 1>in the first round and I was like, how did

0:25:35.000 --> 0:25:37.720
<v Speaker 1>you even get that over the rim? He can fade.

0:25:37.800 --> 0:25:40.960
<v Speaker 1>He's got the post fade that everybody knows, and he's

0:25:41.000 --> 0:25:44.479
<v Speaker 1>like quick when he spins. You can't lean on his shoulder.

0:25:44.600 --> 0:25:46.800
<v Speaker 1>He'll just feel it and get around you. And you

0:25:46.840 --> 0:25:48.840
<v Speaker 1>can't sag off because he'll turn around and shoot over you.

0:25:48.840 --> 0:25:50.840
<v Speaker 1>And it's like, you know, it's a two point ten

0:25:50.880 --> 0:25:53.480
<v Speaker 1>foot or most defenses are like, oh hey, whatever, but

0:25:53.560 --> 0:25:55.040
<v Speaker 1>he makes enough of him that you have to panic

0:25:55.040 --> 0:25:57.879
<v Speaker 1>about it, and so even really good defenders have to

0:25:57.920 --> 0:26:00.480
<v Speaker 1>battle with technique. There's a lot of young biggs in

0:26:00.480 --> 0:26:02.600
<v Speaker 1>the NBA that you know, this is just a dear

0:26:02.640 --> 0:26:04.160
<v Speaker 1>I've had for a while that like they don't guard

0:26:04.160 --> 0:26:06.000
<v Speaker 1>post ups that much coming up anymore, with just the

0:26:06.000 --> 0:26:09.120
<v Speaker 1>way basketball is like changed. I don't think Jared Allen

0:26:09.119 --> 0:26:11.080
<v Speaker 1>and Evan Mobley apply to this, but like, that's a

0:26:11.080 --> 0:26:13.359
<v Speaker 1>lot of the games where I think Pascal Siakam's at

0:26:13.359 --> 0:26:15.760
<v Speaker 1>his best, where it's just some like young forward who's like,

0:26:15.800 --> 0:26:17.159
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, I don't even know how to do this.

0:26:17.200 --> 0:26:19.320
<v Speaker 1>I've never had to do this before. Why do I

0:26:19.359 --> 0:26:22.119
<v Speaker 1>how are you supposed to stop this mobile? Obviously, Defensive

0:26:22.119 --> 0:26:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Player of the Year knows the tricks of the trade,

0:26:24.320 --> 0:26:27.520
<v Speaker 1>and Jared Allen's amazing, so he can cut up any

0:26:27.680 --> 0:26:31.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of defender because he has so much technique and ability.

0:26:31.760 --> 0:26:33.879
<v Speaker 1>But zones have been a thing I mean so no,

0:26:34.000 --> 0:26:35.720
<v Speaker 1>Haliburn was a big part of it working in that

0:26:35.760 --> 0:26:38.639
<v Speaker 1>game specifically. I wrote a story about this during the season,

0:26:38.720 --> 0:26:41.840
<v Speaker 1>like so much of the zones against the Pacers where

0:26:41.880 --> 0:26:45.000
<v Speaker 1>when bench groups are on the floor, right TJ McConnell

0:26:45.000 --> 0:26:47.240
<v Speaker 1>obviously not thought of as.

0:26:47.040 --> 0:26:48.440
<v Speaker 2>A as a zone.

0:26:48.960 --> 0:26:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well he was in the first round. He would

0:26:50.760 --> 0:26:52.720
<v Speaker 1>just like wheel to the elbow and fling it over

0:26:52.720 --> 0:26:54.280
<v Speaker 1>the Bucks, like over and over again. I thought, what

0:26:54.359 --> 0:26:56.280
<v Speaker 1>is happening? How is this working? But it was but

0:26:56.560 --> 0:26:58.480
<v Speaker 1>like top and really struggled to start the season for

0:26:58.640 --> 0:27:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Deep and Ben Madther and it isn't decisive enough with

0:27:02.119 --> 0:27:03.840
<v Speaker 1>his catch and shooting at times, Like team's been really

0:27:03.840 --> 0:27:04.639
<v Speaker 1>willing to go there, and.

0:27:04.720 --> 0:27:06.720
<v Speaker 2>One guy the ball sticks with yes.

0:27:06.880 --> 0:27:08.879
<v Speaker 1>Yes, teams have been willing to go zone against the

0:27:08.920 --> 0:27:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Pacers bench because of who the units are. But in

0:27:11.720 --> 0:27:13.800
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs one they mix and match more. In two,

0:27:14.720 --> 0:27:17.919
<v Speaker 1>the Calves, the Bucks and the Thunder were three of

0:27:17.920 --> 0:27:19.520
<v Speaker 1>the only teams that were like, yeah, we'll go zone

0:27:19.560 --> 0:27:22.000
<v Speaker 1>against the starters who Cares and it helped that Halburton

0:27:22.200 --> 0:27:24.520
<v Speaker 1>was out, that they lost a very key shooter and

0:27:24.560 --> 0:27:27.560
<v Speaker 1>set up man. But the Pacers, for some reason, every

0:27:27.600 --> 0:27:29.800
<v Speaker 1>so often they see his zone, they're like, wait, what

0:27:29.800 --> 0:27:31.400
<v Speaker 1>what is this sport? What do we do? How does

0:27:31.520 --> 0:27:33.440
<v Speaker 1>you know? And they in the first round they never

0:27:33.440 --> 0:27:35.440
<v Speaker 1>had that problem. They to zone, the'd immediately recognize it,

0:27:35.480 --> 0:27:37.280
<v Speaker 1>they get into their thing, and they'd score against the Bucks.

0:27:38.280 --> 0:27:40.040
<v Speaker 1>So I wonder if they'll be ready for the Calves

0:27:40.040 --> 0:27:43.400
<v Speaker 1>defense because zone defense because of that game that you referenced,

0:27:43.560 --> 0:27:45.960
<v Speaker 1>but it has been a thorn in their side very

0:27:45.960 --> 0:27:48.280
<v Speaker 1>often throughout this season, and the Calves one is just

0:27:48.320 --> 0:27:50.480
<v Speaker 1>different because of their front court size and like even

0:27:50.560 --> 0:27:52.600
<v Speaker 1>does Dean Wade ever mess up ever on defense? Like

0:27:52.600 --> 0:27:55.000
<v Speaker 1>that dude's always in the right spot. His angles are amazing,

0:27:55.040 --> 0:27:58.160
<v Speaker 1>So it's all they're big guys are awesome. So that

0:27:58.160 --> 0:28:00.000
<v Speaker 1>that zone will be better than the Buck zone, right,

0:28:00.080 --> 0:28:02.760
<v Speaker 1>So if it bogs the Pacers down at all, that

0:28:02.800 --> 0:28:04.879
<v Speaker 1>will be a problem. I find the Pacers I have

0:28:04.920 --> 0:28:06.560
<v Speaker 1>confidence because of the way they handle zone in the

0:28:06.600 --> 0:28:09.920
<v Speaker 1>first round, but the regular season record against zone was like, Okay,

0:28:09.960 --> 0:28:12.320
<v Speaker 1>we probably need to be better against this. So that

0:28:12.359 --> 0:28:15.360
<v Speaker 1>is certainly something, especially when it comes to Siakam because

0:28:15.520 --> 0:28:17.520
<v Speaker 1>there's five people standing right around you in your favorite

0:28:17.520 --> 0:28:19.840
<v Speaker 1>spots in his zone. To think about.

0:28:20.280 --> 0:28:22.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I'm going to be fascinated to see kind of

0:28:22.560 --> 0:28:26.200
<v Speaker 4>what defensive strategy the Calves use, because only Miami uses

0:28:26.240 --> 0:28:28.960
<v Speaker 4>more zone than the Calves. The Calves used a ton

0:28:29.040 --> 0:28:31.879
<v Speaker 4>of it in the regular season. They also were incredibly

0:28:31.920 --> 0:28:34.800
<v Speaker 4>switch heavy, and I just don't know if you can

0:28:35.040 --> 0:28:37.680
<v Speaker 4>be as switch heavy when you're talking about a Halliburn

0:28:37.800 --> 0:28:39.840
<v Speaker 4>Sakham pick and roll, like, I think you want to

0:28:39.840 --> 0:28:40.480
<v Speaker 4>fight through that.

0:28:40.440 --> 0:28:41.400
<v Speaker 2>As much as possible.

0:28:42.000 --> 0:28:44.720
<v Speaker 4>Caves for the most part, they trust their guys defensively,

0:28:44.840 --> 0:28:47.920
<v Speaker 4>Like they don't try to hide Darius or Donovan. They

0:28:48.000 --> 0:28:50.360
<v Speaker 4>trust them to stay in front. Sometimes they you know,

0:28:50.480 --> 0:28:54.000
<v Speaker 4>on the switches, they get mismatches, right, Like I've brought

0:28:54.000 --> 0:28:56.760
<v Speaker 4>this up before, but nobody has defended more Jason Tatum

0:28:56.760 --> 0:28:59.600
<v Speaker 4>shots this season than Darius Garland. And that's because Boston's

0:28:59.640 --> 0:29:03.920
<v Speaker 4>going to hunt those situations and Darius, like you know,

0:29:04.000 --> 0:29:06.880
<v Speaker 4>he's giving up a lot of size, but he is

0:29:06.920 --> 0:29:09.800
<v Speaker 4>a very good screen navigator. He does a terrific job

0:29:09.800 --> 0:29:12.000
<v Speaker 4>of that. Donovan's a if you look at the numbers

0:29:12.120 --> 0:29:14.840
<v Speaker 4>is a little less strong when it comes to screen navigation.

0:29:14.960 --> 0:29:16.840
<v Speaker 4>But both of those guys are going to stay in

0:29:16.840 --> 0:29:19.200
<v Speaker 4>front of their guys. I just don't know if you

0:29:19.240 --> 0:29:21.720
<v Speaker 4>want to be in a situation where you're allowing Siakam

0:29:21.720 --> 0:29:24.600
<v Speaker 4>to get onto Darius Garland or Donovan Mitchell in those spots.

0:29:24.600 --> 0:29:28.280
<v Speaker 4>I think you're going to try to get guys to

0:29:28.520 --> 0:29:30.800
<v Speaker 4>fight through in those situations. They'll be interested to see

0:29:30.840 --> 0:29:33.960
<v Speaker 4>if they go zone. Also be interested to see the

0:29:34.080 --> 0:29:36.680
<v Speaker 4>difference in how they defend the pick and roll with

0:29:36.720 --> 0:29:40.080
<v Speaker 4>Passal Siakam versus the pick and pop with Miles Turner,

0:29:40.520 --> 0:29:43.840
<v Speaker 4>because I expect that to be two completely different strategies.

0:29:43.880 --> 0:29:46.320
<v Speaker 2>But I think they got to switch that, dude, I

0:29:46.360 --> 0:29:48.800
<v Speaker 2>really do. I agree with that. I agree with the

0:29:48.840 --> 0:29:51.880
<v Speaker 2>Turner one because at the end of the day, you

0:29:51.920 --> 0:29:54.520
<v Speaker 2>look at that heat series, and the story of it

0:29:54.600 --> 0:30:01.160
<v Speaker 2>for Miami offensively other than ah was was that they

0:30:01.200 --> 0:30:04.640
<v Speaker 2>could not crack the Calves shell. You know, they like

0:30:05.080 --> 0:30:07.840
<v Speaker 2>they would switch, or they'd fight over the screen and

0:30:07.840 --> 0:30:10.600
<v Speaker 2>stay connected in front. They just didn't have to go

0:30:10.680 --> 0:30:14.920
<v Speaker 2>to on the ball against anyone on Miami at any point. Really,

0:30:15.440 --> 0:30:19.640
<v Speaker 2>And I think the cave I've said this all year.

0:30:20.760 --> 0:30:22.760
<v Speaker 2>The Calves have not been the best defense in the

0:30:22.840 --> 0:30:26.120
<v Speaker 2>NBA this season, I still believe in their shell defense

0:30:26.640 --> 0:30:29.720
<v Speaker 2>more than any other team, you know, because when because

0:30:29.760 --> 0:30:33.520
<v Speaker 2>that means everything's functioning. And when everything's functioning, you've got

0:30:34.000 --> 0:30:36.280
<v Speaker 2>a mobile or an Allen who is able to switch

0:30:36.320 --> 0:30:40.320
<v Speaker 2>on the perimeter and another rim protector that never had

0:30:40.320 --> 0:30:42.560
<v Speaker 2>to leave the back line in the first place. And

0:30:42.800 --> 0:30:45.680
<v Speaker 2>I think the more you can do that, like, you

0:30:45.800 --> 0:30:48.920
<v Speaker 2>have a talent advantage against this indie team. Sorry, Tony,

0:30:49.680 --> 0:30:52.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, I think this Calves team, you know, has

0:30:52.160 --> 0:30:56.680
<v Speaker 2>more top end scoring talent. So like, as long as

0:30:56.720 --> 0:31:01.200
<v Speaker 2>you don't let that indie machine get worrying, like, you've

0:31:01.200 --> 0:31:04.240
<v Speaker 2>got a much better chance. So like, and I think,

0:31:04.280 --> 0:31:07.040
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I cannot think of a more different outcome

0:31:07.160 --> 0:31:11.640
<v Speaker 2>than like an aj Green Brook Lopez pick and pop

0:31:11.960 --> 0:31:15.520
<v Speaker 2>defended pick and pop. Then you know Max Struz or

0:31:15.560 --> 0:31:19.360
<v Speaker 2>DeAndre Hunter and h and Jared or Evan you know,

0:31:19.600 --> 0:31:23.760
<v Speaker 2>guarding that action. I do think to that end, this

0:31:23.840 --> 0:31:27.520
<v Speaker 2>should be a big Dean Wade series because it should

0:31:27.560 --> 0:31:30.800
<v Speaker 2>be a big DeAndre Hunter at the three series because

0:31:30.800 --> 0:31:35.360
<v Speaker 2>if you're able to put DeAndre on Tyresee and again,

0:31:35.440 --> 0:31:39.880
<v Speaker 2>I don't think DeAndre is like an elite perimeter stopper,

0:31:40.320 --> 0:31:44.840
<v Speaker 2>but that action is so switchable. And if I'm gonna

0:31:44.840 --> 0:31:50.080
<v Speaker 2>die to Miles Turner post ups on DeAndre Hunter, I

0:31:50.120 --> 0:31:51.400
<v Speaker 2>guess I'm just gonna die.

0:31:51.520 --> 0:31:54.160
<v Speaker 1>I just feel like, hey, ask the Bucks about that.

0:31:54.200 --> 0:31:57.440
<v Speaker 1>In Game four they died well, you.

0:31:57.400 --> 0:31:59.880
<v Speaker 2>Know, and sometimes like and that is the thing about

0:32:00.200 --> 0:32:03.560
<v Speaker 2>series is both these offenses are so good. Yeah, sometimes

0:32:03.640 --> 0:32:06.600
<v Speaker 2>they're like they're just gonna win, you know, and like,

0:32:06.800 --> 0:32:09.080
<v Speaker 2>I think you're gonna have I think both teams there's

0:32:09.120 --> 0:32:12.320
<v Speaker 2>gonna be a real test of like, you know, of

0:32:12.400 --> 0:32:15.760
<v Speaker 2>confidence and will agreed to win because I think there

0:32:15.760 --> 0:32:19.160
<v Speaker 2>are going to be stretches in this series where either

0:32:19.240 --> 0:32:23.520
<v Speaker 2>team scores five six possessions in a row and it's

0:32:23.560 --> 0:32:25.560
<v Speaker 2>not because they made because the other team made some

0:32:25.680 --> 0:32:26.360
<v Speaker 2>huge mistake.

0:32:27.080 --> 0:32:29.680
<v Speaker 1>There's been some shocking moments in this NBA Playoffs, some

0:32:29.720 --> 0:32:32.840
<v Speaker 1>crazy game winners. One of my most like, wait, what moments?

0:32:33.000 --> 0:32:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Was you talk about the Cavs shell defense. I look

0:32:35.560 --> 0:32:38.280
<v Speaker 1>at the box score halftime, it's heat calves. Game three.

0:32:38.880 --> 0:32:41.880
<v Speaker 1>The Heat are nine for twenty from deep and they're

0:32:41.880 --> 0:32:44.840
<v Speaker 1>down by over twenty points. I'm like, what happened?

0:32:45.320 --> 0:32:45.920
<v Speaker 2>In the game.

0:32:46.080 --> 0:32:48.800
<v Speaker 1>What what are how could they? How are they? How

0:32:48.800 --> 0:32:50.280
<v Speaker 1>can they not keep going on fire?

0:32:50.440 --> 0:32:52.360
<v Speaker 4>That was the whole series pretty much, with the exception

0:32:52.440 --> 0:32:54.800
<v Speaker 4>of Game four because they just totally quit. But like

0:32:55.160 --> 0:32:57.520
<v Speaker 4>we were sitting there at Carter and I were at

0:32:57.520 --> 0:32:59.800
<v Speaker 4>games one and two, and at halftime of each game

0:32:59.840 --> 0:33:02.960
<v Speaker 4>were like Miami shooting like fifty from three in their

0:33:03.000 --> 0:33:06.160
<v Speaker 4>down ten and you looked at it and it basically

0:33:06.320 --> 0:33:10.000
<v Speaker 4>was they were shooting lights out on contested twos and

0:33:10.320 --> 0:33:12.760
<v Speaker 4>we were sitting there being like, this is going to

0:33:12.840 --> 0:33:14.560
<v Speaker 4>fall apart. You are not going to be able to

0:33:14.600 --> 0:33:17.360
<v Speaker 4>sustain this. You are not getting the shot quality that

0:33:18.080 --> 0:33:20.320
<v Speaker 4>is going to allow you to keep up with the Cavs.

0:33:20.320 --> 0:33:23.680
<v Speaker 2>And I think they just kind of broke after a

0:33:23.720 --> 0:33:24.240
<v Speaker 2>little while.

0:33:24.440 --> 0:33:26.360
<v Speaker 4>They gave it the best shot in games to everyone

0:33:26.400 --> 0:33:29.239
<v Speaker 4>thinks that, Yeah, I think that's fair to say. I

0:33:29.240 --> 0:33:32.120
<v Speaker 4>think even some of their exit interviews reflected that. One

0:33:32.120 --> 0:33:35.160
<v Speaker 4>thing I'm curious about, Tony, is there guys that were

0:33:35.240 --> 0:33:38.040
<v Speaker 4>playing in the first round that you think are going

0:33:38.040 --> 0:33:41.040
<v Speaker 4>to have a lesser or larger role for Indiana going

0:33:41.120 --> 0:33:41.880
<v Speaker 4>up against the Cavs.

0:33:42.080 --> 0:33:43.840
<v Speaker 2>What do you kind of That's a good question. Co

0:33:43.920 --> 0:33:45.520
<v Speaker 2>host thank you very much.

0:33:46.560 --> 0:33:49.320
<v Speaker 1>I've actually been thinking about that, and I'm not really

0:33:49.600 --> 0:33:51.760
<v Speaker 1>sure there should be a ton of shift, not because

0:33:51.800 --> 0:33:55.120
<v Speaker 1>the teams have personnel that's similar, but because they just

0:33:55.160 --> 0:33:57.080
<v Speaker 1>burned a lot of their front core bodies to like

0:33:57.160 --> 0:34:01.520
<v Speaker 1>guardian Us with foulsand be fine with that and so yeah,

0:34:01.600 --> 0:34:03.760
<v Speaker 1>the Calves don't have you, honest, but they have more

0:34:03.840 --> 0:34:06.760
<v Speaker 1>front court size besides, you know, one player, like they

0:34:06.800 --> 0:34:09.360
<v Speaker 1>are going to be big for a lot of the games,

0:34:09.480 --> 0:34:12.279
<v Speaker 1>Like they're not gonna send away Thomas Bryant, Like they'll

0:34:12.280 --> 0:34:15.400
<v Speaker 1>need a backup five to play for sure. Obie Toppin's

0:34:15.480 --> 0:34:17.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna play. Jars Walker maybe would be the guy who

0:34:17.640 --> 0:34:20.759
<v Speaker 1>would play a little bit less, I suppose, but not.

0:34:21.040 --> 0:34:23.319
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he's a valuable guy with size that can

0:34:23.360 --> 0:34:25.880
<v Speaker 1>make shots. Ben Sheppard they dusted off because he's one

0:34:25.920 --> 0:34:28.520
<v Speaker 1>of their best perimeter defenders at not allowing blowbys. Hey, look,

0:34:28.520 --> 0:34:30.359
<v Speaker 1>the Calves have too elite ball handling guards. Like they're

0:34:30.360 --> 0:34:32.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna need him to play. McConnell's gonna play, Mathen's gonna play.

0:34:32.960 --> 0:34:37.719
<v Speaker 1>Topin's gonna play. So I don't think so, but I'll

0:34:37.760 --> 0:34:39.960
<v Speaker 1>be curious how the series kind of shifts that, like

0:34:40.000 --> 0:34:43.040
<v Speaker 1>if the Calves, how much do the Calves go to

0:34:43.440 --> 0:34:45.920
<v Speaker 1>whatever their reserve front court ends up being in the

0:34:45.960 --> 0:34:49.040
<v Speaker 1>series or is it just like forty minutes each for Allan?

0:34:50.000 --> 0:34:53.720
<v Speaker 2>It won't be That's yeah, I don't think Kenny. Kenny

0:34:54.480 --> 0:34:58.319
<v Speaker 2>is just you know, he's been really committed to a

0:34:58.400 --> 0:35:02.680
<v Speaker 2>deep rotation. With that said, it's been you know, if

0:35:02.680 --> 0:35:04.200
<v Speaker 2>you look at just the box score and you do

0:35:04.200 --> 0:35:07.160
<v Speaker 2>a quick glance, you'll see, I mean, until Darius got hurt.

0:35:07.400 --> 0:35:09.520
<v Speaker 2>You know, Darius got hurt, he went down to nine.

0:35:10.000 --> 0:35:12.120
<v Speaker 2>But like when you look at games one and two,

0:35:12.160 --> 0:35:16.239
<v Speaker 2>you see, all right, he played ten men kind of

0:35:16.600 --> 0:35:22.239
<v Speaker 2>he played eight, and then like a short shift for

0:35:22.360 --> 0:35:24.840
<v Speaker 2>Dean in the first half and a short shift for

0:35:24.880 --> 0:35:27.520
<v Speaker 2>Okoro in the first half, and that was kind of

0:35:27.560 --> 0:35:30.040
<v Speaker 2>what he you know, so he played ten nominally, but

0:35:30.080 --> 0:35:33.319
<v Speaker 2>he really played eight. But like, I don't think you're

0:35:33.360 --> 0:35:37.160
<v Speaker 2>going to see a lot of these forty minute windows

0:35:37.160 --> 0:35:39.400
<v Speaker 2>because even when he does that, the Cavs binch is

0:35:39.480 --> 0:35:43.399
<v Speaker 2>so good, so vital that you know, it's just really

0:35:43.440 --> 0:35:46.440
<v Speaker 2>hard to get your starters to forty plus minutes. If

0:35:46.480 --> 0:35:49.960
<v Speaker 2>Ty Jerome is playing twenty six, twenty seven, DeAndre Hunter's

0:35:49.960 --> 0:35:53.479
<v Speaker 2>playing twenty six twenty seven, like sam Merrill's playing twenty

0:35:53.560 --> 0:35:55.480
<v Speaker 2>two to twenty three, Like all of a sudden, you're

0:35:55.520 --> 0:35:58.160
<v Speaker 2>just kind of like running out of minutes to yeah,

0:35:58.160 --> 0:35:58.560
<v Speaker 2>a portion.

0:35:59.160 --> 0:36:01.760
<v Speaker 4>The thing is doesn't feel like it's a bench lineup

0:36:01.760 --> 0:36:04.439
<v Speaker 4>when you always have one of Darius and Donovan out there,

0:36:04.480 --> 0:36:06.280
<v Speaker 4>one of Jared and Evan and.

0:36:06.719 --> 0:36:08.120
<v Speaker 1>The best player in the league, Ty Jerome.

0:36:08.440 --> 0:36:10.400
<v Speaker 4>I was about to say, and to help, you know,

0:36:10.560 --> 0:36:13.960
<v Speaker 4>bridge those minutes, you have DeAndre Hunter and ty Jerome,

0:36:14.040 --> 0:36:16.240
<v Speaker 4>who were two of the you know, top three starting

0:36:16.560 --> 0:36:20.000
<v Speaker 4>quality players right right, and then oh who who were

0:36:20.080 --> 0:36:21.840
<v Speaker 4>going to throw you know, at small forward. Well, we

0:36:21.880 --> 0:36:23.799
<v Speaker 4>can still have Max Drews out there, we can have

0:36:23.880 --> 0:36:25.880
<v Speaker 4>Dean Wade out there. We can go to Isaaca O Corral,

0:36:25.880 --> 0:36:28.680
<v Speaker 4>we can go sam Merril. I am interested to see

0:36:29.840 --> 0:36:32.200
<v Speaker 4>who Kenny goes to because as.

0:36:32.200 --> 0:36:34.399
<v Speaker 1>I was wondering, that is this the series Kenny act?

0:36:34.440 --> 0:36:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Because tell me if I'm wrong, it feels like every

0:36:36.200 --> 0:36:37.640
<v Speaker 1>time he has to make a decision, he's like, I

0:36:37.680 --> 0:36:40.120
<v Speaker 1>want the shooter. I picked the guy who can shoot better,

0:36:40.360 --> 0:36:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Like is this the series? He like kind of indexes

0:36:42.880 --> 0:36:45.680
<v Speaker 1>towards defense a little more with those decisions I'm not sure.

0:36:45.560 --> 0:36:49.319
<v Speaker 2>I think if I'm Kenny, because like I think I

0:36:49.520 --> 0:36:53.320
<v Speaker 2>was really really pleasantly surprised by Sam Merrill in the

0:36:53.400 --> 0:36:57.040
<v Speaker 2>last series. It's good say I was disappointed by Isaaca Coral,

0:36:57.080 --> 0:37:00.719
<v Speaker 2>but like it wasn't. It was very clearly not going

0:37:00.800 --> 0:37:05.080
<v Speaker 2>to be his series very quickly, And I do think

0:37:05.760 --> 0:37:10.640
<v Speaker 2>that they are going to need to index on positional

0:37:10.760 --> 0:37:13.799
<v Speaker 2>size a little bit more in this. And he's just

0:37:13.840 --> 0:37:18.359
<v Speaker 2>so big in that the Pascal post ups loom. You know,

0:37:18.520 --> 0:37:23.520
<v Speaker 2>Jarris Walker is just rugged, super physical. Obi Toppin can

0:37:23.560 --> 0:37:25.960
<v Speaker 2>be a terror in transition, He's not like a post

0:37:26.080 --> 0:37:27.920
<v Speaker 2>Up threat. But like they just have a lot of

0:37:28.000 --> 0:37:31.280
<v Speaker 2>big dudes who even Matherins like a very big wing.

0:37:31.800 --> 0:37:35.640
<v Speaker 2>And I do wonder if this is a Dean series

0:37:36.440 --> 0:37:40.200
<v Speaker 2>more than a Sam series, so maybe Sam still plays.

0:37:40.760 --> 0:37:46.640
<v Speaker 2>But like I think positional size for defensive purposes makes

0:37:46.680 --> 0:37:49.960
<v Speaker 2>a lot of sense, especially if you're getting your playmaking

0:37:50.040 --> 0:37:53.200
<v Speaker 2>somewhere else. But like I also just think like you're

0:37:53.200 --> 0:37:55.360
<v Speaker 2>gonna need to be able to attack them in multiple spots.

0:37:55.400 --> 0:37:57.760
<v Speaker 2>That's why I kind of like more minutes of DeAndre

0:37:57.840 --> 0:38:02.160
<v Speaker 2>at the three playing a lot alongside Darius Donovan. Tie

0:38:02.280 --> 0:38:04.600
<v Speaker 2>two of those guys at all times, just you can

0:38:04.640 --> 0:38:07.480
<v Speaker 2>constantly be attacking because I have the ball. Pressure from

0:38:07.520 --> 0:38:11.239
<v Speaker 2>Indy is my That's like my number one like subplot

0:38:11.320 --> 0:38:14.160
<v Speaker 2>for Indy defensively in the series is how much pressure

0:38:14.200 --> 0:38:17.239
<v Speaker 2>they put on you on the ball. So, like, I

0:38:17.239 --> 0:38:19.799
<v Speaker 2>don't know, it just doesn't. It doesn't feel like a

0:38:19.880 --> 0:38:22.960
<v Speaker 2>SAM series to me. But I was pleasantly surprised at

0:38:23.040 --> 0:38:25.640
<v Speaker 2>how much that Miami series was a SAM series. So

0:38:25.640 --> 0:38:25.960
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:38:26.040 --> 0:38:27.719
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I didn't think the first round to be a

0:38:27.760 --> 0:38:30.279
<v Speaker 1>JAFF series. He played very well, And I mentioned six

0:38:30.400 --> 0:38:32.160
<v Speaker 1>bench guys when you asked me about that. They'd never

0:38:32.200 --> 0:38:34.880
<v Speaker 1>played all six in one game, right, the first two games,

0:38:34.880 --> 0:38:37.640
<v Speaker 1>no Ben Shepherd, then it was no Jeris Walker, but

0:38:37.640 --> 0:38:40.719
<v Speaker 1>then Mattheren got hurt, so they got both those guys in,

0:38:40.760 --> 0:38:43.040
<v Speaker 1>and then in game five Thomas Bryant at the floor

0:38:43.080 --> 0:38:45.560
<v Speaker 1>for one possession for rebounding purposes. He was the guy

0:38:45.560 --> 0:38:48.200
<v Speaker 1>effectively out. So they never actually played eleven. It's always

0:38:48.480 --> 0:38:51.160
<v Speaker 1>been five specific bench guys. If you made me guess

0:38:51.200 --> 0:38:54.160
<v Speaker 1>fully healthy, who the Pacers reserve would be that doesn't play,

0:38:54.440 --> 0:38:56.720
<v Speaker 1>I would guess to start the series, he'd be jarifs

0:38:56.760 --> 0:38:59.839
<v Speaker 1>Walker but it wouldn't surprise me if after like one

0:39:00.080 --> 0:39:02.240
<v Speaker 1>or two games, are like, Okay, we can't stop him anyway,

0:39:02.440 --> 0:39:03.960
<v Speaker 1>let's just go small in the front court and try

0:39:03.960 --> 0:39:06.480
<v Speaker 1>to score like crazy, and then Walker and Top and

0:39:06.480 --> 0:39:08.560
<v Speaker 1>the Siaka make up the front court.

0:39:08.600 --> 0:39:11.480
<v Speaker 2>So are you suggesting Bryant would take Walker's minutes?

0:39:11.520 --> 0:39:14.879
<v Speaker 1>Basically, yeah, they I think you just need a center, right.

0:39:14.920 --> 0:39:17.200
<v Speaker 1>The Cavs just are gonna have a big five on

0:39:17.200 --> 0:39:20.560
<v Speaker 1>the floor the whole time. And I called the Goldilocks number.

0:39:20.560 --> 0:39:22.640
<v Speaker 1>When you get the right number of minutes, like seven

0:39:22.680 --> 0:39:26.240
<v Speaker 1>minutes of Thomas Bryant is probably fine, just hustle, get boards,

0:39:26.560 --> 0:39:29.359
<v Speaker 1>but his defense is not very good, and he you know,

0:39:29.520 --> 0:39:32.120
<v Speaker 1>either shoots one three er doesn't shoot at all in

0:39:32.160 --> 0:39:34.759
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs usually, So it would not surprise me if

0:39:34.800 --> 0:39:36.840
<v Speaker 1>they very quickly like okay, that was a mistake, but

0:39:36.920 --> 0:39:39.719
<v Speaker 1>I would I would start with the size route and

0:39:39.760 --> 0:39:42.800
<v Speaker 1>see how it goes. Walker is obviously big, but you know,

0:39:43.080 --> 0:39:45.600
<v Speaker 1>and they've survived with Walker, Top and Siakim as the

0:39:45.640 --> 0:39:47.840
<v Speaker 1>reserve front court a lot, and Siakam plays with the

0:39:47.840 --> 0:39:50.360
<v Speaker 1>bench groups more than any other pacers starter, So that

0:39:50.360 --> 0:39:52.080
<v Speaker 1>would not surprise me if they went to that first,

0:39:52.120 --> 0:39:54.400
<v Speaker 1>but I think it will be between Bryan's and Walker

0:39:54.440 --> 0:39:56.920
<v Speaker 1>for their last spot and Shepherd, you know, no one

0:39:56.960 --> 0:39:59.560
<v Speaker 1>really thinks of him, but like that, he's just one

0:39:59.600 --> 0:40:02.200
<v Speaker 1>of their better defenders and you're going to absolutely need

0:40:02.239 --> 0:40:04.000
<v Speaker 1>that all the time in this series.

0:40:04.440 --> 0:40:06.319
<v Speaker 2>One thing that I just looked up because I was like,

0:40:06.400 --> 0:40:08.680
<v Speaker 2>I feel like Bryant played a healthy amount against the

0:40:08.680 --> 0:40:12.000
<v Speaker 2>Calves this year. Played more minutes against the Calves than

0:40:12.040 --> 0:40:15.160
<v Speaker 2>any other team this season, played seventy minutes.

0:40:15.800 --> 0:40:18.200
<v Speaker 1>That's right, because he they didn't play the Calves till

0:40:18.200 --> 0:40:21.040
<v Speaker 1>after they traded for him, and then he played a

0:40:21.040 --> 0:40:22.879
<v Speaker 1>ton in those last two games when it.

0:40:22.800 --> 0:40:24.880
<v Speaker 2>Was like the five games, the.

0:40:25.360 --> 0:40:29.279
<v Speaker 1>Seating the well, the Pacers seating, the Calves seating was

0:40:29.280 --> 0:40:31.480
<v Speaker 1>over the seating wars. I don't even know what to

0:40:31.520 --> 0:40:35.960
<v Speaker 1>call those. For the Calves. It's the seating seeding for

0:40:36.040 --> 0:40:39.160
<v Speaker 1>the Pacers. There's the seat seating games for the Calves.

0:40:39.280 --> 0:40:44.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, the Calves, that was basically March for them. Unfortunately,

0:40:44.719 --> 0:40:46.880
<v Speaker 4>Boston was unable to keep up so that the Calves

0:40:46.920 --> 0:40:49.439
<v Speaker 4>were a little lackluster for the last month.

0:40:49.719 --> 0:40:52.120
<v Speaker 1>I was being a psycho for like weeks, being like, oh,

0:40:52.200 --> 0:40:54.160
<v Speaker 1>the Calve's going to be trying to get home court

0:40:54.160 --> 0:40:56.000
<v Speaker 1>advantage in the finals in these games and they're gonna

0:40:56.000 --> 0:40:57.600
<v Speaker 1>care at all, how's this gonna go. They did not

0:40:57.719 --> 0:40:59.319
<v Speaker 1>end up caring about that, so it.

0:40:59.440 --> 0:41:03.000
<v Speaker 4>Was benefited one of those weird scheduling things where they

0:41:03.040 --> 0:41:05.480
<v Speaker 4>played seventeen games in a row where they didn't play

0:41:05.480 --> 0:41:07.600
<v Speaker 4>in the same city twice in a row. This is

0:41:07.719 --> 0:41:10.680
<v Speaker 4>basically a seventeen game road trip, and I think going back,

0:41:10.719 --> 0:41:14.080
<v Speaker 4>it was actually like twenty two out of twenty four

0:41:14.120 --> 0:41:17.279
<v Speaker 4>games basically from like February through March. So it was

0:41:17.680 --> 0:41:19.880
<v Speaker 4>a tough, tough time with not a lot to play for,

0:41:19.960 --> 0:41:22.560
<v Speaker 4>and I think that showed up in the results. I'm

0:41:22.600 --> 0:41:26.560
<v Speaker 4>fascinated for the Cavs to see basically who this eighth

0:41:26.600 --> 0:41:31.319
<v Speaker 4>through nineth guy is on the team, and maybe even tenth,

0:41:31.400 --> 0:41:34.600
<v Speaker 4>you know, as a result of that, because Dean Wade

0:41:34.760 --> 0:41:37.800
<v Speaker 4>moved ahead of isaacle Core in the rotation mid series,

0:41:38.160 --> 0:41:41.480
<v Speaker 4>and I really like what that length can do. But

0:41:42.080 --> 0:41:45.520
<v Speaker 4>if we are still rolling out Sam Merril as that

0:41:45.600 --> 0:41:48.640
<v Speaker 4>eighth guy, it becomes tougher to play Dean Wade in

0:41:48.680 --> 0:41:51.080
<v Speaker 4>those spots. It becomes tougher to play that length because

0:41:51.080 --> 0:41:53.480
<v Speaker 4>if you're always going to have one of Darius and

0:41:53.480 --> 0:41:56.560
<v Speaker 4>Donovan out there, and ty Jerome comes in. That means

0:41:56.560 --> 0:41:59.080
<v Speaker 4>Sam Marril has to play at small Ford, which means

0:41:59.120 --> 0:42:01.920
<v Speaker 4>you are going to be smaller. Sam has done a

0:42:02.040 --> 0:42:05.560
<v Speaker 4>terrific job. Those lineups have absolutely crushed it. I think

0:42:05.560 --> 0:42:08.400
<v Speaker 4>that there's a possibility that they continue to crush it

0:42:08.440 --> 0:42:11.279
<v Speaker 4>in the series. But you are giving up size in

0:42:11.320 --> 0:42:15.160
<v Speaker 4>those matchups, so I'm curious to see how Kenny uses

0:42:15.200 --> 0:42:18.200
<v Speaker 4>those guys where they slide into the rotation. But I

0:42:18.880 --> 0:42:21.080
<v Speaker 4>think I agree with you. I think for the most part,

0:42:21.280 --> 0:42:23.600
<v Speaker 4>I don't see Inde changing up their rotation. I don't

0:42:23.600 --> 0:42:25.600
<v Speaker 4>see the Cavs changing up their rotation a whole bit.

0:42:26.000 --> 0:42:28.600
<v Speaker 4>I think it's going to be a pretty typical series

0:42:28.719 --> 0:42:31.160
<v Speaker 4>of to feel it out games and then we see

0:42:31.200 --> 0:42:32.439
<v Speaker 4>where the adjustments go from there.

0:42:33.080 --> 0:42:36.920
<v Speaker 2>I have a question for you, fellas, Okay, a little

0:42:36.960 --> 0:42:40.359
<v Speaker 2>segment I'm inventing on the fly, which is who is

0:42:40.400 --> 0:42:43.600
<v Speaker 2>the player that the opposing fan base is most likely

0:42:43.680 --> 0:42:45.480
<v Speaker 2>to hate by the end of the series.

0:42:46.360 --> 0:42:48.719
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's funny you guys are talking about Sam Merrill.

0:42:48.960 --> 0:42:50.879
<v Speaker 1>He hit like five threes in a row two feet

0:42:50.920 --> 0:42:52.600
<v Speaker 1>from me when the Cavs are in any of that

0:42:52.640 --> 0:42:55.759
<v Speaker 1>third last game of the season. The Pacers fan base

0:42:55.840 --> 0:42:57.279
<v Speaker 1>is in my mentions like are they ever going to

0:42:57.320 --> 0:42:59.560
<v Speaker 1>guard Gary Trent? Are they ever gonna guard a j. Green?

0:42:59.680 --> 0:43:03.080
<v Speaker 1>So the profile of that kind of player suggests that

0:43:03.120 --> 0:43:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Sam Merril has a good shot of that crown, and

0:43:05.000 --> 0:43:06.839
<v Speaker 1>also Max Streus is a good shot at that crown

0:43:06.880 --> 0:43:09.799
<v Speaker 1>for similar reasons. Max Strews is a forty plus three

0:43:09.800 --> 0:43:11.640
<v Speaker 1>point shooter who I feel like goes seven for eight

0:43:11.680 --> 0:43:14.560
<v Speaker 1>or two freight to like him, So there's a very

0:43:14.560 --> 0:43:16.600
<v Speaker 1>good chance that he has like three seven freight games,

0:43:16.600 --> 0:43:18.520
<v Speaker 1>like I hate that Struce guy you never misses.

0:43:18.760 --> 0:43:21.360
<v Speaker 2>He's also a talker and he's very physical.

0:43:21.480 --> 0:43:23.520
<v Speaker 1>That will be good again in a Pacer series. The

0:43:23.560 --> 0:43:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Pacers are not afraid to respond to talkers, and that I'm.

0:43:27.560 --> 0:43:29.400
<v Speaker 2>It's going to make him even more annoying because and

0:43:29.440 --> 0:43:30.520
<v Speaker 2>that is fine, to.

0:43:30.440 --> 0:43:33.440
<v Speaker 1>Be clear, I think that is fun for all everybody talks.

0:43:33.560 --> 0:43:34.360
<v Speaker 1>Get your yappin on.

0:43:35.440 --> 0:43:37.960
<v Speaker 2>I tell you who I'm prepared to hate, and it's

0:43:38.000 --> 0:43:40.640
<v Speaker 2>Andrew nim Hard. I think he is going to be

0:43:40.760 --> 0:43:44.760
<v Speaker 2>a thorn in their side, Like I feel like every

0:43:44.840 --> 0:43:48.880
<v Speaker 2>good minute Indy has in this series, Andrew nim Hard

0:43:49.880 --> 0:43:54.160
<v Speaker 2>is going to be involved. Yeah, I think his physicality

0:43:54.480 --> 0:43:58.120
<v Speaker 2>is a serious His ball pressure is really really important.

0:43:58.440 --> 0:44:01.120
<v Speaker 2>I think, especially give in that the Cavs are going

0:44:01.160 --> 0:44:04.640
<v Speaker 2>to start so many possessions with bigger wings on Halliburton

0:44:05.680 --> 0:44:07.560
<v Speaker 2>means I think they're going to do a lot of

0:44:07.640 --> 0:44:11.560
<v Speaker 2>stashing of Darius and Donovan on nim Hard, and he's

0:44:11.600 --> 0:44:15.280
<v Speaker 2>going to have to create shots for them and consistently

0:44:15.800 --> 0:44:19.360
<v Speaker 2>get buckets just to create, you know, because like you

0:44:19.400 --> 0:44:22.239
<v Speaker 2>can't just do the Haliburton pick and roll in perpetuity.

0:44:22.360 --> 0:44:24.720
<v Speaker 2>Like to your point, a big part of this team's

0:44:24.800 --> 0:44:27.240
<v Speaker 2>DNA is how many places they can kill you from.

0:44:27.760 --> 0:44:31.280
<v Speaker 2>I think nim Hard has just the right amount of irritation.

0:44:31.719 --> 0:44:36.160
<v Speaker 2>He's an irritant on defense and hits really ballsy shots

0:44:36.160 --> 0:44:39.920
<v Speaker 2>on offense, Like he's a shoots better than his percentages

0:44:40.000 --> 0:44:43.719
<v Speaker 2>guy in the right series, and like, yeah, that's the

0:44:43.760 --> 0:44:46.960
<v Speaker 2>guy I'm prepared to like, you know, ball my fist

0:44:47.040 --> 0:44:50.439
<v Speaker 2>up and shake well. I can never say I could

0:44:50.440 --> 0:44:53.960
<v Speaker 2>never say, yeah, yeah, I'm not about to go what

0:44:54.360 --> 0:44:56.920
<v Speaker 2>Matther and I can see myself, I can see myself

0:44:57.440 --> 0:45:00.760
<v Speaker 2>not being thrilled with him. I think who I'm prepared

0:45:00.760 --> 0:45:02.720
<v Speaker 2>to hate by the end of the series is TJ McConnell.

0:45:02.719 --> 0:45:04.239
<v Speaker 2>I just feel like there's gonna be a stretch where

0:45:04.280 --> 0:45:07.160
<v Speaker 2>that guy gets five steals in a quarter and I

0:45:07.320 --> 0:45:10.080
<v Speaker 2>just get annoyed by his face. I think that's the

0:45:10.120 --> 0:45:10.680
<v Speaker 2>way this goes.

0:45:10.680 --> 0:45:13.480
<v Speaker 4>But harder to your point about Nemhard, I think it's

0:45:13.520 --> 0:45:15.879
<v Speaker 4>important for people to realize. I tweeted this out before

0:45:15.880 --> 0:45:20.440
<v Speaker 4>the podcast, but Basketball index as Nemhard as one hundred

0:45:20.480 --> 0:45:23.160
<v Speaker 4>percentile perimeter isolation defender.

0:45:23.400 --> 0:45:25.280
<v Speaker 2>He's awesome, dude, He's nailed.

0:45:25.400 --> 0:45:25.839
<v Speaker 1>So good.

0:45:25.880 --> 0:45:27.839
<v Speaker 2>He is nails. He is so damn good.

0:45:28.080 --> 0:45:29.920
<v Speaker 1>He is better than his percentages.

0:45:29.960 --> 0:45:30.120
<v Speaker 2>Guy.

0:45:30.200 --> 0:45:32.359
<v Speaker 1>Like most of those guys, it's because the shots they

0:45:32.400 --> 0:45:35.000
<v Speaker 1>make are important, right, so you remember them or they

0:45:35.080 --> 0:45:37.799
<v Speaker 1>like sit with you. Like he had a huge three

0:45:37.840 --> 0:45:39.960
<v Speaker 1>and overtime in Game five for the Pacers. No one

0:45:39.960 --> 0:45:41.920
<v Speaker 1>remembers it because Halbert scored a lot after that, Like

0:45:41.920 --> 0:45:44.040
<v Speaker 1>it was a massive shot, Like all of his iconic

0:45:44.080 --> 0:45:46.440
<v Speaker 1>moments are, like he hit a buzzer beater over Lebron

0:45:46.440 --> 0:45:48.160
<v Speaker 1>from how many feet away? He had a Game three

0:45:48.200 --> 0:45:50.560
<v Speaker 1>game winner in the playoffs, like this thirty two percent shooter,

0:45:50.600 --> 0:45:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Like he just he's lights out when it matters. And

0:45:52.560 --> 0:45:55.920
<v Speaker 1>his defense is just absurd ever since sprunts and not

0:45:55.960 --> 0:45:58.719
<v Speaker 1>embarrassed him, but like was the first guy that made

0:45:58.719 --> 0:46:00.319
<v Speaker 1>them hard look like a not good defense their last

0:46:00.360 --> 0:46:02.239
<v Speaker 1>year in the playoffs. He's even leveled up since then.

0:46:02.320 --> 0:46:05.200
<v Speaker 1>And you mentioned like putting a guard on him. A

0:46:05.200 --> 0:46:07.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of teams will put their horses under on Aaron

0:46:07.120 --> 0:46:09.799
<v Speaker 1>Nee Smith, and that's become harder to do now too,

0:46:09.880 --> 0:46:11.600
<v Speaker 1>because he's got a little bit of waggle going towards

0:46:11.600 --> 0:46:13.960
<v Speaker 1>their m now. So I wonder if the cat.

0:46:14.040 --> 0:46:16.719
<v Speaker 2>Dude share me if you if you ask me Carter, like,

0:46:16.719 --> 0:46:19.680
<v Speaker 2>what are you really nervous about? It's Nie Smith and

0:46:19.760 --> 0:46:24.600
<v Speaker 2>nim Hard swinging a game by being chaotic, getting in transition,

0:46:25.200 --> 0:46:28.319
<v Speaker 2>beating up the Cavaliers. They're so physical at the point

0:46:28.320 --> 0:46:30.799
<v Speaker 2>of attack, dude, it's nuts bad. I feel like the

0:46:30.840 --> 0:46:33.720
<v Speaker 2>Calves like got a taste of that with Davion Mitchell

0:46:33.760 --> 0:46:36.200
<v Speaker 2>in terms of that physicality at the point of attack,

0:46:36.239 --> 0:46:39.560
<v Speaker 2>but it's like you're going up a notch on the

0:46:39.640 --> 0:46:42.080
<v Speaker 2>on the physicality level. Like, I feel like those two

0:46:42.080 --> 0:46:44.200
<v Speaker 2>are closer to what the Cavs had to deal with

0:46:44.360 --> 0:46:48.480
<v Speaker 2>in Orlando last year with Suggs and Harris and Franz

0:46:48.760 --> 0:46:50.600
<v Speaker 2>and all these dudes just beating you up. Like those

0:46:50.640 --> 0:46:51.960
<v Speaker 2>guys are so tough.

0:46:53.680 --> 0:46:56.080
<v Speaker 4>It's gonna be interesting, man. I think this series is

0:46:56.120 --> 0:46:58.560
<v Speaker 4>going to be awesome. Before we get you out of here, Tony,

0:46:58.640 --> 0:47:01.239
<v Speaker 4>let's get some serious predictions and well, well you are

0:47:01.280 --> 0:47:03.400
<v Speaker 4>in hostile territory, you go first.

0:47:04.200 --> 0:47:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I've been leaning towards the Calves since this was

0:47:07.080 --> 0:47:10.920
<v Speaker 1>revealed as going to be the series. The length is challenging.

0:47:10.960 --> 0:47:12.640
<v Speaker 1>I tried to be the guy who's like, I don't

0:47:12.680 --> 0:47:14.600
<v Speaker 1>pick it in six because of the close out on

0:47:14.640 --> 0:47:18.800
<v Speaker 1>the road, So Calves six feels right to me. I

0:47:18.840 --> 0:47:21.160
<v Speaker 1>would be shocked if it was a short series. I

0:47:21.239 --> 0:47:23.040
<v Speaker 1>also said that in the first round, and then it

0:47:23.120 --> 0:47:26.560
<v Speaker 1>was a short series. So you never really know in

0:47:26.640 --> 0:47:28.920
<v Speaker 1>the NBA these days. Maybe I'm underselling the Calves in

0:47:28.960 --> 0:47:32.000
<v Speaker 1>They're one hundred and thirty eight offensive rating. Calves five

0:47:32.080 --> 0:47:35.080
<v Speaker 1>is I assume going to be a popular Calves four.

0:47:35.200 --> 0:47:35.800
<v Speaker 2>I think.

0:47:37.560 --> 0:47:40.960
<v Speaker 1>I am going to go Calves six or seven. But

0:47:41.040 --> 0:47:43.359
<v Speaker 1>I picked Nixon seven last year and the Pacers beat them,

0:47:43.400 --> 0:47:45.319
<v Speaker 1>So that does not mean I am right or good

0:47:45.320 --> 0:47:46.800
<v Speaker 1>at predictions.

0:47:46.840 --> 0:47:52.080
<v Speaker 2>Carter, Uh, I'm going Calves in five here? Oh wow? Okay,

0:47:52.080 --> 0:47:56.480
<v Speaker 2>I like I but with an important caveat that I

0:47:56.520 --> 0:48:00.480
<v Speaker 2>think four of those wins could be tough as as hell.

0:48:00.840 --> 0:48:03.720
<v Speaker 2>I do not think this is a dominant Cavalier series

0:48:04.000 --> 0:48:07.080
<v Speaker 2>where they're just winning. If they win two games by

0:48:07.120 --> 0:48:10.040
<v Speaker 2>twenty or two games by twenty is two bigs. If

0:48:10.080 --> 0:48:13.560
<v Speaker 2>they win two games by fifteen, ten to fifteen, like,

0:48:13.800 --> 0:48:16.719
<v Speaker 2>I'll feel really really good about this series. I respect

0:48:16.719 --> 0:48:19.160
<v Speaker 2>the heck out of this Indy team. You know, they just,

0:48:19.480 --> 0:48:22.160
<v Speaker 2>to your point earlier in the pod, justin they just

0:48:22.200 --> 0:48:24.400
<v Speaker 2>don't have a lot of weak links. They play a

0:48:24.400 --> 0:48:27.200
<v Speaker 2>lot of guys who are pretty darn good. I think

0:48:27.239 --> 0:48:30.920
<v Speaker 2>they are a little short on guys who are uber elite,

0:48:31.360 --> 0:48:33.759
<v Speaker 2>which is why I think the Calves should have the

0:48:33.800 --> 0:48:37.600
<v Speaker 2>advantage in crunch time in some tight games down the stretchers.

0:48:37.680 --> 0:48:40.319
<v Speaker 2>Is why I'm picking Calves in five. But like I

0:48:40.360 --> 0:48:42.920
<v Speaker 2>said this to Jason Tempf on his pod earlier today

0:48:43.440 --> 0:48:45.880
<v Speaker 2>that if you were to like make me pick like

0:48:46.080 --> 0:48:49.640
<v Speaker 2>a likelihood, I would chunk Calves in five, Calves and

0:48:49.680 --> 0:48:53.440
<v Speaker 2>six and Calves and seven in a very tight odds window.

0:48:53.640 --> 0:48:55.239
<v Speaker 2>Like I don't think that.

0:48:55.920 --> 0:48:57.799
<v Speaker 1>Me people like that, I'm gonna steal that I'm sorry,

0:48:57.840 --> 0:48:58.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm stealing that.

0:48:58.760 --> 0:49:02.279
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, enjoy. You know, I think you'd have to take,

0:49:02.400 --> 0:49:06.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, a little tier lower for Pacers in seven,

0:49:06.600 --> 0:49:09.279
<v Speaker 2>you know, because I do think the Calves should be

0:49:09.320 --> 0:49:12.400
<v Speaker 2>overwhelmingly likely to win the series based on all the

0:49:12.440 --> 0:49:14.640
<v Speaker 2>metrics that we have in front of us and all

0:49:14.640 --> 0:49:18.000
<v Speaker 2>the tape from round one. But I think it's going

0:49:18.040 --> 0:49:20.320
<v Speaker 2>to be really, really hard work and it's going to

0:49:20.400 --> 0:49:24.600
<v Speaker 2>be honestly, just way closer to the test we thought

0:49:24.719 --> 0:49:26.759
<v Speaker 2>Miami might be able to give this Calves team in

0:49:26.800 --> 0:49:28.800
<v Speaker 2>terms of making them win the series.

0:49:29.040 --> 0:49:33.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, And I've been going back and forth between five

0:49:33.239 --> 0:49:34.719
<v Speaker 4>and six. I think there's going to be a game

0:49:34.760 --> 0:49:37.120
<v Speaker 4>in this series where India is just flat out playing

0:49:37.160 --> 0:49:37.879
<v Speaker 4>like the better team.

0:49:38.120 --> 0:49:41.000
<v Speaker 2>If we sweep them, that would be It's not I don't.

0:49:41.000 --> 0:49:42.000
<v Speaker 2>I don't think that's going to happen.

0:49:42.160 --> 0:49:44.520
<v Speaker 4>I think I think Indy's going to outplay the Caves

0:49:44.520 --> 0:49:46.600
<v Speaker 4>in one of these games, and whether it's five or

0:49:46.640 --> 0:49:48.719
<v Speaker 4>six is going to come down to is there a

0:49:48.760 --> 0:49:50.840
<v Speaker 4>wild shooting variance game in either direction?

0:49:51.000 --> 0:49:51.880
<v Speaker 2>Like it's no.

0:49:52.560 --> 0:49:54.560
<v Speaker 4>I think back to the first loss that the Caves

0:49:54.600 --> 0:49:57.279
<v Speaker 4>had against Atlanta, where you got thirty two wide open

0:49:57.320 --> 0:50:01.040
<v Speaker 4>threes and shot twenty on them. If that happens, or

0:50:01.080 --> 0:50:04.920
<v Speaker 4>if Indie shoots like, you know, sixty seventy percent on

0:50:05.160 --> 0:50:08.759
<v Speaker 4>like on their threes, which we've seen them do in

0:50:09.320 --> 0:50:11.920
<v Speaker 4>versus the Cavs in the past, I can see that

0:50:11.960 --> 0:50:15.279
<v Speaker 4>extent of the series. I'm there's no way I'm going

0:50:15.360 --> 0:50:17.360
<v Speaker 4>to let you pick fewer games than me, though, So

0:50:17.560 --> 0:50:18.479
<v Speaker 4>I'm going to go five.

0:50:18.680 --> 0:50:21.160
<v Speaker 2>That's that's where I have to go. You're you're not

0:50:21.200 --> 0:50:23.160
<v Speaker 2>going to do that to me. Here's the thing about

0:50:24.000 --> 0:50:27.400
<v Speaker 2>Justin Tony is I pick. I try to pick these

0:50:27.480 --> 0:50:31.120
<v Speaker 2>series intellectually. He picks them in a way that won't

0:50:31.120 --> 0:50:36.200
<v Speaker 2>get him yelled at by our listeners because he's a coward. No,

0:50:36.760 --> 0:50:39.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm a man of instinct. I am a man of guts.

0:50:39.400 --> 0:50:40.760
<v Speaker 2>I am a man of feeling.

0:50:40.960 --> 0:50:43.880
<v Speaker 4>I ignore my brain when I'm making picks.

0:50:43.920 --> 0:50:46.239
<v Speaker 2>I go with my heart that much as clear.

0:50:46.480 --> 0:50:49.800
<v Speaker 4>And it makes me right more frequently than you didn't

0:50:49.800 --> 0:50:50.680
<v Speaker 4>you pick Milwaukee.

0:50:51.480 --> 0:50:55.879
<v Speaker 2>Let's let's put you. I think you did. I think

0:50:55.920 --> 0:50:58.880
<v Speaker 2>I said it would be closer than people thought.

0:50:59.000 --> 0:51:01.600
<v Speaker 4>And I said it would I said it was five games,

0:51:01.600 --> 0:51:03.040
<v Speaker 4>and he's going to clean them.

0:51:03.800 --> 0:51:06.359
<v Speaker 2>I picked Calves and seven and Stormlando when everyone else

0:51:06.400 --> 0:51:08.279
<v Speaker 2>was saying it was going to be five or six.

0:51:08.480 --> 0:51:11.560
<v Speaker 4>And I picked Calves over the heat in four. I

0:51:11.600 --> 0:51:14.720
<v Speaker 4>also told you that Detroit was going to win the series.

0:51:15.120 --> 0:51:18.200
<v Speaker 4>And you know, if if the last two minutes was

0:51:18.239 --> 0:51:21.200
<v Speaker 4>called correctly, if the if the last few minutes was

0:51:21.239 --> 0:51:23.440
<v Speaker 4>called correctly, they would have already won the series.

0:51:24.200 --> 0:51:28.239
<v Speaker 3>So sorry that you have to hear us take tim

0:51:28.239 --> 0:51:31.759
<v Speaker 3>Hardleay was not failed anyway. Continue Oh wow, yes, I

0:51:31.840 --> 0:51:35.560
<v Speaker 3>disagree with everyone, including NBA officials who.

0:51:35.400 --> 0:51:38.759
<v Speaker 1>Said, yeah, was a foul our bags and Josh Hart. Yeah,

0:51:38.760 --> 0:51:41.800
<v Speaker 1>I have literally no ground on the planet to stand on.

0:51:42.239 --> 0:51:44.640
<v Speaker 4>Well, I'm sorry you had to witness mom and dad fighting.

0:51:45.200 --> 0:51:47.520
<v Speaker 4>He's unfortunate, but every now and then we got to

0:51:47.560 --> 0:51:49.239
<v Speaker 4>do it, Tony. Before we let you out of here,

0:51:49.320 --> 0:51:50.840
<v Speaker 4>let the people know where they can find you.

0:51:50.920 --> 0:51:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yep. If you're watching at Tony, ours is on

0:51:53.880 --> 0:51:56.320
<v Speaker 1>the screen. But that is my Twitter handle. I finally

0:51:56.719 --> 0:51:58.640
<v Speaker 1>have like a professional, boring one with just my middle

0:51:58.680 --> 0:52:00.360
<v Speaker 1>initial in there, so that's where you can find me.

0:52:01.560 --> 0:52:04.560
<v Speaker 4>Mine is still nonsense. It is slapping the caves in Canada,

0:52:04.680 --> 0:52:07.799
<v Speaker 4>and that's what it is. Thank you so much for

0:52:07.840 --> 0:52:10.680
<v Speaker 4>having us, or for coming on. Make sure you guys

0:52:10.719 --> 0:52:13.080
<v Speaker 4>are checking out Lockdown Pacers throughout the series.

0:52:13.320 --> 0:52:13.960
<v Speaker 2>Always good to.

0:52:13.960 --> 0:52:16.239
<v Speaker 4>Be getting that perspective from another team. Big thanks to

0:52:16.239 --> 0:52:18.600
<v Speaker 4>everyone tuning in live on YouTube. Make sure you guys

0:52:18.680 --> 0:52:20.960
<v Speaker 4>like and subscribe. Click that notification bell so you know

0:52:21.000 --> 0:52:22.520
<v Speaker 4>when we're going live. If you're listening to you a

0:52:22.600 --> 0:52:24.239
<v Speaker 4>podcast and you want to support, leave us a rating

0:52:24.320 --> 0:52:27.360
<v Speaker 4>the review, subscribe unsubscribed, resubscribe and help cook those books.

0:52:27.400 --> 0:52:29.040
<v Speaker 4>If you want to be part of Chase Doown's exclusive

0:52:29.080 --> 0:52:31.319
<v Speaker 4>discord chat Sunday screenshow there view to Chase down pot

0:52:31.320 --> 0:52:33.600
<v Speaker 4>at gmail dot com. However you choose the supports, we

0:52:33.680 --> 0:52:35.279
<v Speaker 4>really do you appreciate it. Make sure you guys are

0:52:35.280 --> 0:52:36.040
<v Speaker 4>staying safe out there.

0:52:36.080 --> 0:52:37.800
<v Speaker 2>Until next time, Go Cavs