WEBVTT - 2018 CareerBuilder Preview 0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:02.560 I miss the green, for example, I'm already upset. 0:00:02.680 --> 0:00:04.960 When I find my ball in the bunker, I'm really upset. 0:00:05.040 --> 0:00:05.920 And when I find my. 0:00:05.920 --> 0:00:09.000 Ball in a brid egg Friday Egg, the dreaded Frida Egg, 0:00:09.080 --> 0:00:11.760 Friday Frida Egg Bride. 0:00:11.480 --> 0:00:14.120 Egg Lie, I'm about ready to run off of the course. 0:00:39.600 --> 0:00:42.680 Ladies and gentlemen, Welcome back to another edition of the 0:00:42.680 --> 0:00:47.879 Friday Egg Podcast. Today, I'm joined by Polly and Kyle Nathan, 0:00:48.080 --> 0:00:49.960 and we're going to do a little bit of a 0:00:50.000 --> 0:00:53.720 recap on the Sony and a preview of the Career 0:00:53.760 --> 0:00:57.240 Builder Challenge. Kyle, Paul, how are you doing. 0:00:58.920 --> 0:00:59.160 Good? 0:00:59.200 --> 0:01:03.080 And how are you guys doing Guys. 0:01:04.319 --> 0:01:09.479 Not much, just getting over the blimp gate of twenty 0:01:09.520 --> 0:01:14.000 eighteen Sony Open coverage done mostly by Blimp. 0:01:15.080 --> 0:01:15.400 Yeah, it was. 0:01:15.480 --> 0:01:16.800 It was kind of like straight out of the seventies, 0:01:16.840 --> 0:01:19.119 almost apart like maybe the Show's Wonderful World of Golf. 0:01:20.400 --> 0:01:24.640 I honestly thought I was watching like the CDGA periscoping 0:01:24.720 --> 0:01:27.600 the end of like the State Midam or something. At 0:01:27.640 --> 0:01:29.920 times it was it was high quality TV. 0:01:30.000 --> 0:01:30.399 It was hard. 0:01:30.400 --> 0:01:33.319 It was hard to go from that dramatic football game 0:01:33.480 --> 0:01:36.160 to periscope and blimp golf. 0:01:37.480 --> 0:01:41.959 Just an uneventful six hole playoff too. M H just 0:01:42.319 --> 0:01:46.319 magnified how bad it was. But I do have to 0:01:46.360 --> 0:01:50.680 give Golf Channel some props, like George Savarcaz doing the 0:01:50.680 --> 0:01:54.480 play by play for like five hours from from Orlando. 0:01:54.200 --> 0:01:55.280 Was pretty impressive. 0:01:56.800 --> 0:02:01.520 They pulled it together for having no audio or real video. 0:02:01.600 --> 0:02:06.520 Guys, I'm in complete agreement. I actually, when I was 0:02:06.560 --> 0:02:11.040 reading the story on Sunday morning, I kind of thought 0:02:11.040 --> 0:02:14.160 they might even just bag it all together on the telecast. 0:02:14.240 --> 0:02:17.000 But I give them a lot of credit too, because 0:02:17.000 --> 0:02:19.600 they made a lot out of really nothing. 0:02:20.280 --> 0:02:22.800 So I'm with you, Paully. 0:02:22.880 --> 0:02:26.320 What do you think of Paton Kazaire second win of 0:02:26.639 --> 0:02:27.160 the season. 0:02:28.080 --> 0:02:30.280 He started to feel comfortable on tour and once he 0:02:30.400 --> 0:02:32.320 kind of got the one woman back at the Ohl, 0:02:32.400 --> 0:02:35.120 it seems like when he beat Foller there, he's just 0:02:35.160 --> 0:02:36.560 kind of ready to kind of get on a roll 0:02:36.639 --> 0:02:37.760 similar to what he did when he was on the 0:02:37.760 --> 0:02:40.640 web dot com. Once he got comfortable, he started, you know, 0:02:40.680 --> 0:02:42.200 winning a lot of events. 0:02:42.520 --> 0:02:45.000 Yeah, I think he's kind of in that bucket we 0:02:45.000 --> 0:02:48.160 were talking about Harmon and Kissner, guys that take a 0:02:48.160 --> 0:02:50.680 little bit longer to develop but could end up being 0:02:50.720 --> 0:02:52.919 a really really good pro for a while. 0:02:53.720 --> 0:02:55.680 Definitely, especially if you get him on a course where 0:02:55.720 --> 0:02:58.680 he doesn't have to hit a lot of fairways. It 0:02:58.760 --> 0:03:00.040 was kind of weird that he kind of want it 0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:03.359 only because you wouldn't expect his game to fit there. 0:03:03.400 --> 0:03:05.760 He just happened his irons and putty well there. 0:03:05.840 --> 0:03:07.880 But if you get him on a course such as 0:03:07.919 --> 0:03:11.040 this week, were the fairways are a little bit wider, 0:03:11.040 --> 0:03:12.320 you got a little bit of room to miss off 0:03:12.320 --> 0:03:15.680 the tee because Lawyer could win a lot of tournaments 0:03:16.200 --> 0:03:18.160 just based upon the fact of how solid is iron 0:03:18.160 --> 0:03:18.960 and putting him is. 0:03:20.360 --> 0:03:25.720 Yeah, outside of Sea Wu disappointing me, My biggest regret 0:03:25.960 --> 0:03:32.119 was that we greatly underestimated one Desuke to Kotoka. 0:03:33.000 --> 0:03:34.119 Well we did mention. 0:03:37.680 --> 0:03:40.200 I think there wasn't much intel out on him, and 0:03:40.480 --> 0:03:42.560 turns out he can he can play a little golf. 0:03:44.200 --> 0:03:45.760 Yes, definitely, that. 0:03:45.760 --> 0:03:47.440 Name seems like a name you can just kind of 0:03:47.480 --> 0:03:51.160 forget about until the PGA Championship when he had as 0:03:51.240 --> 0:03:54.800 the second round league, because that feels like it's coming 0:03:54.880 --> 0:03:55.240 for sure. 0:03:55.520 --> 0:03:57.240 Pulling the old shingle, I'm on us. 0:03:57.920 --> 0:03:59.720 Yeah, who was the other guy that last year was 0:03:59.720 --> 0:04:00.760 a two a go whistling. 0:04:01.480 --> 0:04:03.040 Was that a Tanahara? Yeah? 0:04:03.080 --> 0:04:04.240 I think she had a shot, like, what did she 0:04:04.440 --> 0:04:07.119 sixty three or something? The second day it's unconscious. 0:04:07.320 --> 0:04:09.400 Well, the same thing at the match play last year, 0:04:09.400 --> 0:04:11.160 done in Austin and then you were there, right Andy, Right. 0:04:11.360 --> 0:04:13.840 Yeah, yeah, tany Harrow was a giant killer. 0:04:18.000 --> 0:04:20.880 So, uh, Paul, have you got any other takeaways from 0:04:21.000 --> 0:04:24.120 yesterday or the whole weekend? No? 0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:26.200 I think one of the surprising things was that the 0:04:26.240 --> 0:04:29.680 final winning score was only seventeen under. I'm guessing when 0:04:29.680 --> 0:04:31.920 you know, guys like Justin Thomas and Jordan's be teed 0:04:32.000 --> 0:04:34.560 up on Sunday morning, they were expecting the winning score 0:04:34.600 --> 0:04:37.479 to be twenty. So when Justin Thomas reflects on it, 0:04:37.560 --> 0:04:39.520 we kind of saw it in his you know, post 0:04:39.600 --> 0:04:41.640 on interview that when he realized that he could have 0:04:41.680 --> 0:04:43.600 shot I think sixty three and been in a playoff, 0:04:44.960 --> 0:04:47.000 it might have stung a little bit because that that's 0:04:47.040 --> 0:04:49.000 definitely not on the realm of possibilities for him on 0:04:49.000 --> 0:04:49.640 that golf course. 0:04:52.120 --> 0:04:55.200 Kyle, you got anything, you know? 0:04:55.320 --> 0:04:58.640 My one takeaway is that Brian Harmon is continuing to 0:04:58.720 --> 0:05:02.000 just be in fuego and you know, put himself in 0:05:02.040 --> 0:05:03.160 position to win. 0:05:04.560 --> 0:05:05.680 Seemingly every week now. 0:05:05.760 --> 0:05:07.800 And we actually got a question from k Tex He 0:05:08.279 --> 0:05:09.200 it's a repeat question. 0:05:09.240 --> 0:05:10.200 He's asked us a few. 0:05:10.000 --> 0:05:14.120 Times about Brian Harmon being a household name over under 0:05:14.160 --> 0:05:15.920 one and a half wins and it's hard. 0:05:16.040 --> 0:05:18.880 You know, winning's a fickle thing in golf, but it's 0:05:18.920 --> 0:05:20.920 hard to take the under on that. I mean, he's 0:05:21.080 --> 0:05:22.440 he's there every week. 0:05:22.279 --> 0:05:27.000 Basically, Yeah, I think he is going to rack up 0:05:27.040 --> 0:05:29.560 wins in his thirties. I think he's thirty one, So 0:05:30.240 --> 0:05:33.520 lots of golf had it. Something it's interesting to think 0:05:33.520 --> 0:05:36.400 about is last year was the year of the twenties 0:05:36.440 --> 0:05:40.160 and could we see the thirty year old fight back 0:05:40.240 --> 0:05:43.280 this year punch back? And so far in twenty eighteen, 0:05:43.320 --> 0:05:45.800 we've got two thirty year guys in the thirties winning 0:05:46.520 --> 0:05:49.920 the first two events. With Harmon he had the career 0:05:49.920 --> 0:05:53.640 builder after two straight weeks in contention and the last 0:05:53.640 --> 0:05:56.240 two years he finished T third and T eleventh. That 0:05:56.800 --> 0:06:00.240 mean Palm Springs so obviously a good pick for this week. 0:06:01.080 --> 0:06:05.279 Unique format, fifty four holes before the cut, and it's 0:06:05.279 --> 0:06:08.279 a pro am and they play three different courses. Polly, 0:06:08.360 --> 0:06:11.599 what are you looking for at Palm Springs in terms 0:06:11.640 --> 0:06:13.720 of stats and what are you focusing on? 0:06:14.400 --> 0:06:16.720 So in terms of stats, they have three different courses. 0:06:16.720 --> 0:06:20.360 They have Lakinta, Nicholas, and the Stadium course, which is 0:06:20.360 --> 0:06:22.080 where they played. They'll play two of the four rounds, 0:06:22.080 --> 0:06:24.480 so everybody after the cut will play on the Stadium 0:06:24.480 --> 0:06:26.479 course on Sunday. 0:06:26.640 --> 0:06:28.640 In terms of stats, I'm gonna be. 0:06:28.560 --> 0:06:32.039 Focusing most on approach game and ability to make a 0:06:32.080 --> 0:06:35.520 lot of putts between probably that five to fifteen foot range. 0:06:35.720 --> 0:06:37.919 These are traditionally some of the best greens on tour 0:06:38.160 --> 0:06:41.200 in terms of conditioning and speed. So we've seen a 0:06:41.200 --> 0:06:43.719 lot of guys that have been able to hit approach 0:06:43.720 --> 0:06:46.320 shots in that zone, just rack up a lot of 0:06:46.320 --> 0:06:48.680 berdize and take it super deep in this tournament. 0:06:48.320 --> 0:06:48.760 In the past. 0:06:49.640 --> 0:06:53.120 Last year was a anomaly in terms of the conditioning. 0:06:53.800 --> 0:06:56.839 I mean it was cold and windy, which it's usually 0:06:57.000 --> 0:06:58.240 very dome like out there. 0:06:58.880 --> 0:07:01.120 Yeah, definitely, So I think last year the cut was 0:07:01.320 --> 0:07:04.280 five under after fifty four holes, and then in twenty 0:07:04.360 --> 0:07:06.800 sixteen it was nine under. You had to shoot for 0:07:06.839 --> 0:07:09.520 three rounds to make the cut. And one other thing 0:07:09.520 --> 0:07:12.160 about the cut, since it's only me one round on 0:07:12.240 --> 0:07:15.280 Sunday is if there is actually more than seventy eight players, 0:07:15.560 --> 0:07:18.000 they actually cut to sixty and ties instead of seventy. 0:07:18.320 --> 0:07:21.440 So with a condensed leaderboard, I wouldn't be surprised if 0:07:21.480 --> 0:07:23.480 you have seventy nine or eighty and you think your 0:07:23.480 --> 0:07:25.600 guy me the cut being tied for sixty eighth, then 0:07:25.600 --> 0:07:26.640 he actually misses it. 0:07:26.720 --> 0:07:29.240 So it's one thing to be aware of for fantasy wise. 0:07:29.800 --> 0:07:32.160 From what I looked at, it doesn't seem like it's 0:07:32.480 --> 0:07:36.800 two bomber heavy in terms of the courses don't favor 0:07:36.880 --> 0:07:38.040 bombers that much. 0:07:38.360 --> 0:07:39.480 I think it's. 0:07:39.440 --> 0:07:42.800 More favors like the really steady ball strikers. 0:07:42.840 --> 0:07:43.600 Am I right there? 0:07:44.720 --> 0:07:44.960 Yeah? 0:07:45.040 --> 0:07:46.640 The only thing is I think the par five's are 0:07:46.680 --> 0:07:48.600 able to attack. And then there are a couple of 0:07:48.760 --> 0:07:50.880 courses or a couple of holes in the courses to 0:07:50.880 --> 0:07:52.880 where you can take driver if you're confident. And that's 0:07:52.920 --> 0:07:54.400 kind of what like Jamie Lovemark has done in the 0:07:54.400 --> 0:07:57.280 Pass and these courses. He's felt confident with these driver 0:07:57.400 --> 0:07:59.800 and he's kind of just swung away with it. And 0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:01.480 so if there's guys that are gonna do that, they 0:08:01.480 --> 0:08:03.560 have the potential to make. You know, a lot of birdies, 0:08:03.600 --> 0:08:06.040 but there's going a lot of approach shots between you know, 0:08:06.360 --> 0:08:08.960 one twenty five and one fifty zone where the guys 0:08:09.000 --> 0:08:10.840 are hit you know, anywhere from gap wedge to maybe 0:08:10.920 --> 0:08:11.440 nine irons. 0:08:11.440 --> 0:08:13.720 They're gonna have a lot of those each round. 0:08:14.920 --> 0:08:17.000 So the field is okay. 0:08:17.040 --> 0:08:19.960 There's only five guys in the top thirty in the world, 0:08:20.400 --> 0:08:25.280 headliner or like Rom and Michelson. And then the course 0:08:25.320 --> 0:08:27.920 setup has been the same the last Now this will 0:08:27.960 --> 0:08:31.559 be the third year where they play PGA West Stadium course, 0:08:31.600 --> 0:08:34.920 which is the famous Pete Die design that got booted 0:08:34.960 --> 0:08:37.480 off of the tour in the eighties for being, you know, 0:08:37.520 --> 0:08:40.960 because the players hated it so much. The PGA West 0:08:41.120 --> 0:08:44.679 Nicholas Tournament Course, and then Lacina, which has been a 0:08:44.760 --> 0:08:48.520 staple of the rotation forever and the easiest course. I 0:08:48.559 --> 0:08:51.240 was talking to Zach Blair earlier. He said, the one 0:08:51.280 --> 0:08:53.840 thing is that, you know, like a lot of courses, 0:08:54.280 --> 0:08:56.319 if you can hit it to ninety, you can get 0:08:56.320 --> 0:08:58.199 past a lot of the bunkers if you can carry 0:08:58.200 --> 0:09:03.040 it to ninety. So with Bubba actually playing back this 0:09:03.160 --> 0:09:05.720 year for the first time since twenty ten, is he 0:09:05.760 --> 0:09:06.840 a play Polly? 0:09:08.559 --> 0:09:08.920 Probably? 0:09:09.120 --> 0:09:13.000 I think there's a lot other options on the board 0:09:13.000 --> 0:09:15.000 this week besides Bubba, so. 0:09:15.400 --> 0:09:18.160 Let's kick off with one and done, leagues, kind of 0:09:18.200 --> 0:09:19.200 who pop for you? 0:09:20.679 --> 0:09:23.160 So, guys, in terms of popping, I mean, if you 0:09:23.200 --> 0:09:25.600 want to go the stut route, obviously like Harmon and 0:09:25.679 --> 0:09:27.760 Ramer there. As you mentioned Harmon, you know has played 0:09:27.760 --> 0:09:30.720 good the last two times here, and he also made 0:09:30.720 --> 0:09:33.240 it out a Q School on these on the Nicholas 0:09:33.280 --> 0:09:36.360 Tournament course in the Stadium course for a couple of years, 0:09:36.400 --> 0:09:37.760 and so he got out of here a Q School 0:09:37.760 --> 0:09:41.600 in twenty eleven, finished eighth there. So you know there's 0:09:41.600 --> 0:09:44.520 a pedigree of playing good at this track and playing 0:09:44.559 --> 0:09:47.600 good recently. So if you didn't take Harmon last week, 0:09:47.920 --> 0:09:50.080 this is another good opportunity to get a guy while 0:09:50.120 --> 0:09:52.480 he's hot, probably got a pretty good chance of getting 0:09:52.480 --> 0:09:54.840 a top five or top ten this week. Some people 0:09:54.880 --> 0:09:56.600 may want to choose John Ram this week, but I'm 0:09:56.600 --> 0:09:59.000 probably gonna end up saving him for later in the year. 0:09:59.200 --> 0:10:01.240 But he has you know, he's only. 0:10:01.160 --> 0:10:04.360 Played here once before, but he's clearly the best player 0:10:04.360 --> 0:10:06.280 in the field by a long shot in terms of 0:10:06.280 --> 0:10:09.120 like world ranking, So you could go with him, and 0:10:09.160 --> 0:10:10.640 then you can always go for some of the other 0:10:10.679 --> 0:10:12.040 guy who's down the line. We can kind of talk 0:10:12.080 --> 0:10:14.000 some of those maybe when we kind of go through 0:10:14.000 --> 0:10:16.320 like the DraftKings portion can kind of talk about who 0:10:16.360 --> 0:10:18.240 may be a potential one and done option as well. 0:10:18.920 --> 0:10:21.600 It seems like the key with Ram is, like you 0:10:21.760 --> 0:10:24.720 just he's going to be a good pick for almost 0:10:24.760 --> 0:10:27.560 any golf course or any field. He's finished in the 0:10:27.559 --> 0:10:30.760 top ten forty five percent of his start since he's 0:10:31.280 --> 0:10:34.520 in any pro event. So it's just an editor of 0:10:34.559 --> 0:10:37.840 avoiding like not getting unlucky and having it be a 0:10:37.880 --> 0:10:40.200 one bad week of the year. 0:10:40.840 --> 0:10:42.520 He kind of seems like a guy to hold for 0:10:42.520 --> 0:10:45.160 a Major because you know, his pick percentage would be 0:10:45.160 --> 0:10:47.080 pretty low in the Major, you'd think. 0:10:48.000 --> 0:10:50.000 Yeah, the only thing I'm afraid with Rom is that 0:10:50.080 --> 0:10:52.439 if he wins a couple of times early in the 0:10:52.480 --> 0:10:54.520 year before Major, he all of a sudden may become 0:10:54.559 --> 0:10:57.600 a popular pick for the majors. Right, And we've seen 0:10:57.640 --> 0:11:00.360 that what guys happened before. So you know, maybe a 0:11:00.360 --> 0:11:02.439 week where if you take Rom, maybe he's only five 0:11:02.520 --> 0:11:04.440 or ten percent on in your league, and if he wins, 0:11:04.440 --> 0:11:05.400 you get a massive edge. 0:11:05.480 --> 0:11:08.200 Right, Yeah, that's it. 0:11:08.200 --> 0:11:09.800 I mean, I don't think a lot of people will 0:11:09.880 --> 0:11:13.040 be picking them this week. Another high profile guy would 0:11:13.040 --> 0:11:16.960 be like Patrick Reid, who's won here before and has 0:11:17.240 --> 0:11:19.440 has finished a lot of had a lot of high 0:11:19.440 --> 0:11:21.520 finishes here. It's actually his first start of the year. 0:11:21.960 --> 0:11:23.880 You like Patrick Reid, Are you fading him? 0:11:25.000 --> 0:11:26.720 I wouldn't take him for one and done this week. 0:11:26.760 --> 0:11:30.040 So his victory was one of the different course rotations. 0:11:30.040 --> 0:11:32.280 So he's gone twelve and fifty sixth and the two 0:11:32.320 --> 0:11:35.240 times they've done this course rotation. So I'm not as 0:11:35.320 --> 0:11:37.320 much of a fan on these courses, on these courses 0:11:37.360 --> 0:11:39.000 than than what was previous. 0:11:39.720 --> 0:11:43.240 So we've talked about Rom, Harmon and Reed. Who are 0:11:43.280 --> 0:11:46.480 those are the top three price guys on DraftKings. Then 0:11:46.960 --> 0:11:50.920 also above ten thousand we've got Kevin Kissner and Phil Micholson. 0:11:51.360 --> 0:11:53.240 What do you think about those guys? Are you looking 0:11:53.280 --> 0:11:55.280 to get you know, one or two of the high 0:11:55.320 --> 0:11:56.160 priced guys? 0:11:56.679 --> 0:11:59.120 No, if I was going with somebody on DraftKings, it's 0:11:59.160 --> 0:12:01.280 going to be either Be or Harmon up on top, 0:12:01.400 --> 0:12:03.840 just just because of the birdie potential. So if you 0:12:03.880 --> 0:12:05.720 look at Rom and you see last year he was 0:12:05.800 --> 0:12:08.200 thirty fourth here, may it look like a bad result. 0:12:08.240 --> 0:12:11.320 But if we dig into it, he had twenty birdies 0:12:11.400 --> 0:12:14.320 last year and finished thirty fourth. He just happened to have, 0:12:14.400 --> 0:12:17.280 you know, seven bogies and two doubles, and on the 0:12:17.280 --> 0:12:19.720 sixteen par fives he played, he only played them two under. 0:12:20.600 --> 0:12:20.840 Wow. 0:12:20.880 --> 0:12:23.240 So it seems like there's a lot of room improvement 0:12:23.280 --> 0:12:25.679 based on what we know about John Rahm, where he 0:12:25.720 --> 0:12:28.080 could come out here and you know, necessarily blow the 0:12:28.080 --> 0:12:31.080 field away, but he could carry the rest of your lineup, 0:12:31.120 --> 0:12:34.640 and I don't see guys like Kissner or you know, 0:12:34.720 --> 0:12:35.839 or Michelson carrying a. 0:12:35.760 --> 0:12:36.520 Lineup this week. 0:12:36.679 --> 0:12:38.880 The other thing is is it kind of goes to 0:12:38.920 --> 0:12:42.240 what Zach said, is that he's long enough that he 0:12:42.280 --> 0:12:44.560 can get pasted a lot of the trouble and then 0:12:44.679 --> 0:12:47.560 it becomes just a wedge fest for him. And I 0:12:47.600 --> 0:12:49.680 know that's an area where he's worked a ton in 0:12:49.720 --> 0:12:53.839 the offseason, so we could see those improved results this 0:12:53.920 --> 0:12:55.760 week exactly. 0:12:55.800 --> 0:12:56.920 And he's just a birdie machine. 0:12:56.920 --> 0:12:58.560 So I think that's the difference between a guy like 0:12:58.640 --> 0:13:01.800 Kisner and Rom is that every round you're gonna see 0:13:01.840 --> 0:13:04.000 Kisner make probably one or two birdies less than Rom 0:13:04.000 --> 0:13:05.800 in over four rounds. That's going to add up and 0:13:05.840 --> 0:13:09.560 be you know, a big difference for draftings scoring. So 0:13:09.679 --> 0:13:11.560 that's kind of a reason why I like Harmon as well. 0:13:11.559 --> 0:13:14.400 He had twenty two birdies and an eagle there last year, 0:13:14.440 --> 0:13:17.640 twenty three birdies in twenty sixteen, and had thirty one 0:13:17.640 --> 0:13:20.880 birdies here in HU School in twenty eleven, so you 0:13:20.920 --> 0:13:21.880 can definitely fill it up. 0:13:22.280 --> 0:13:26.440 Do you find the multi course events to be easier 0:13:26.520 --> 0:13:27.520 or harder to handicap? 0:13:28.720 --> 0:13:31.480 I would say harder to handicap because in this case, 0:13:32.320 --> 0:13:34.800 and similar to like Pebble Beach, they don't have shot 0:13:34.840 --> 0:13:37.040 link data for all three courses in terms of like 0:13:37.080 --> 0:13:39.240 looking historically, like to figure out trends in terms of 0:13:39.600 --> 0:13:42.439 where did players perform, how do they perform? Did they 0:13:42.440 --> 0:13:44.319 just play good last year and finish high because they 0:13:44.800 --> 0:13:47.000 put it amazing or what happened? You don't necessarily have 0:13:47.080 --> 0:13:49.120 all that data, and that makes it difficult. 0:13:49.559 --> 0:13:50.280 It makes sense. 0:13:51.240 --> 0:13:53.600 Yeah, it's this early part of the season. 0:13:53.640 --> 0:13:56.920 There isn't a lot of shot link data because just 0:13:57.080 --> 0:14:00.160 there's a couple of multi course deals and you know, 0:14:00.200 --> 0:14:02.199 they had the Asia Swing where they didn't have the 0:14:02.280 --> 0:14:04.760 data makes it a little bit more difficult for you. 0:14:05.960 --> 0:14:09.079 Definitely so then we go into like the nine thousands 0:14:09.120 --> 0:14:11.600 and eight thousands, and there's a lot of guys in 0:14:11.679 --> 0:14:15.720 here that are intriguing, whether it be based off of hot, 0:14:15.760 --> 0:14:18.359 recent play or past results. 0:14:18.800 --> 0:14:19.840 Who do you like in here? 0:14:19.880 --> 0:14:24.120 You got Jason Duffner, Webb Simpson, Kazaire who just won 0:14:24.240 --> 0:14:27.440 last week, Hadley who was on a tear, Shay Revey. 0:14:29.560 --> 0:14:32.360 I would actually go with Chez here. So an interesting 0:14:32.360 --> 0:14:34.640 thing with Chez. Last week he finished eighteenth of the 0:14:34.640 --> 0:14:37.160 Sony Open. And he's kind of a typical guy that 0:14:37.240 --> 0:14:42.040 finishes between tenth and twentieth almost every single time. So 0:14:42.080 --> 0:14:43.640 if you look at his record, I think he went 0:14:44.000 --> 0:14:46.040 in the last like such a seven starts. He's finished 0:14:46.080 --> 0:14:48.000 every time in the top twenty five, but never in 0:14:48.000 --> 0:14:51.280 the top ten. This past week he actually lost five 0:14:51.320 --> 0:14:54.840 shots on the green putting and finish eighteenth. He had 0:14:54.920 --> 0:14:58.520 his normal putting, which is gaining about a shot for 0:14:58.560 --> 0:15:00.960 the whole event shorts gain putting, he would have finished 0:15:00.960 --> 0:15:03.840 at seventeen hundred would have been the playoff. So and 0:15:03.840 --> 0:15:05.080 that's just the normal putting week. 0:15:05.480 --> 0:15:05.680 Yeah. 0:15:05.680 --> 0:15:07.760 The other thing about Reve is he went to college 0:15:07.800 --> 0:15:12.240 at Arizona State, so you know, very accustomed to playing desert. 0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:14.840 Golf definitely, And that's kind of the other Corrollari with 0:15:14.920 --> 0:15:17.360 Rom as well. They're kind of comfortable in this in 0:15:17.360 --> 0:15:18.280 the situation. 0:15:19.280 --> 0:15:22.400 So a name that popped in here that I just like, 0:15:22.480 --> 0:15:24.560 you know, saw who I hadn't heard from and so 0:15:24.760 --> 0:15:27.800 long as crazy as Bill hass like kind of been 0:15:28.000 --> 0:15:30.880 become the forgotten man in recent years of golf. 0:15:31.840 --> 0:15:34.760 Yeah, he's one of my most hated DraftKings plays ever 0:15:34.840 --> 0:15:37.800 because he just makes zero birdie, so play around and 0:15:37.840 --> 0:15:41.840 make two birdies one bogie and not really help your 0:15:41.880 --> 0:15:44.760 team at all. And so he's priced here high at 0:15:44.800 --> 0:15:46.720 eighty six hundred. He missed the cut last week, I 0:15:46.720 --> 0:15:49.760 believe Don and Sony, So even though he has a 0:15:49.800 --> 0:15:52.840 good track record here, I don't see enough upside to 0:15:52.880 --> 0:15:54.680 play him in any Draftings sermons this week. 0:15:55.240 --> 0:15:58.320 What about Brendan Steele. I always feel like he's in 0:15:58.360 --> 0:16:02.520 an under that valued guy like he People just don't 0:16:02.760 --> 0:16:04.440 like him, so they don't pick him. 0:16:05.040 --> 0:16:07.480 And I think he's another local guy as well here too, 0:16:08.520 --> 0:16:10.920 But he's played well here last year, I think in 0:16:10.960 --> 0:16:14.160 a top ten finish, and he's another guy that could 0:16:14.360 --> 0:16:16.000 you know, when he gets hot with his game, he 0:16:16.040 --> 0:16:18.720 can roll a lot of putts in and make a 0:16:18.800 --> 0:16:21.480 lot of birdies in around. So I definitely like the 0:16:21.480 --> 0:16:24.040 guys that have the ability to make six, seven, eight 0:16:24.080 --> 0:16:26.600 birdies in a round, whereas like Steele could do it, 0:16:26.600 --> 0:16:28.560 I don't think Hawk can do that consistently. 0:16:30.640 --> 0:16:32.520 So any other ones that add here. 0:16:34.160 --> 0:16:36.320 In that price rad you're talking between like eighty five 0:16:36.360 --> 0:16:40.200 and ten thousand. Now, I don't see any other main guys. 0:16:40.320 --> 0:16:42.200 I mean, I like Web Simpson a little bit up there, 0:16:42.720 --> 0:16:44.440 but I think he's going to be very heavily owned 0:16:44.480 --> 0:16:46.120 based upon how he finished last week. 0:16:46.800 --> 0:16:50.080 Yeah, he seems to be playing pretty well the last 0:16:50.560 --> 0:16:53.080 I don't know, nine months or so. He's really kind 0:16:53.080 --> 0:16:56.880 of rounding back into not what he once was, which 0:16:56.920 --> 0:16:59.080 was a top ten player in the world, but a 0:16:59.120 --> 0:17:00.760 really steady, solid player. 0:17:00.800 --> 0:17:02.840 And he gets a done tee to Green, So. 0:17:03.840 --> 0:17:05.879 Yeah, he actually started to figure out his putting. So 0:17:05.880 --> 0:17:08.720 in his last ten events he had positive strokes stained 0:17:08.720 --> 0:17:11.040 putting in eight of those, So that's kind of where 0:17:11.040 --> 0:17:12.040 his successes come from. 0:17:12.119 --> 0:17:14.280 What about one and done for Web? 0:17:15.560 --> 0:17:15.960 What was that? 0:17:16.119 --> 0:17:17.600 What about one and done for Web? 0:17:19.640 --> 0:17:22.280 I'm probably gonna end up saving him for a few 0:17:22.320 --> 0:17:23.760 other times in the year where I think he's a 0:17:23.760 --> 0:17:27.440 better choice. I don't know if he has enough upside 0:17:27.440 --> 0:17:29.560 to win here. I think he'll get you a top fifteen, 0:17:29.720 --> 0:17:33.520 But there's a couple other choices. I'd be more likely 0:17:33.600 --> 0:17:37.119 to go with Chez probably, and I think he's probably 0:17:37.359 --> 0:17:39.320 you're not gonna use him anywhere else this year, and 0:17:39.359 --> 0:17:41.040 he's got a good chance of getting a top fifteen 0:17:41.040 --> 0:17:42.280 for you if you're going to go that route. 0:17:43.000 --> 0:17:46.280 Okay, So then we move into you know, kind of 0:17:46.359 --> 0:17:50.840 under eighty five hundred and into the seven thousands, and 0:17:51.000 --> 0:17:52.080 what names pop here? 0:17:53.200 --> 0:17:55.000 So the one that popped the most to me, it 0:17:55.080 --> 0:17:58.200 was don at seventy seven hundred was Brent Snedecker. So 0:17:58.280 --> 0:18:01.359 Sneddecker's you know, this is his first event of the 0:18:02.040 --> 0:18:05.320 full season. He played I think one event in the 0:18:05.320 --> 0:18:09.320 fall the RSM made the cut there. It started hit 0:18:09.320 --> 0:18:11.040 the ball pretty well, and then he went and played 0:18:12.080 --> 0:18:14.600 went down and played in Indonesia. And the reason he 0:18:14.600 --> 0:18:16.120 did that is he was trying to make the top 0:18:16.160 --> 0:18:17.720 fifty by the end of the year so he could 0:18:17.720 --> 0:18:18.920 get exempt in the Masters. 0:18:19.240 --> 0:18:20.880 But he fell ill while playing, so he. 0:18:20.840 --> 0:18:23.480 Withdrew down there, so he didn't hit the top fifty 0:18:23.640 --> 0:18:25.919 so he has a little bit of motivation year to 0:18:26.320 --> 0:18:28.600 make it in the top fifty so he can play 0:18:28.600 --> 0:18:31.080 it Augusta because that tournament is his favorite tournament. 0:18:31.119 --> 0:18:31.960