WEBVTT - Not Confident on the U.S. Recovery or Dollar: BBH's Thin

0:00:01.360 --> 0:00:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Swiney, along

0:00:04.120 --> 0:00:06.200
<v Speaker 1>with my co host of Bonnie Quinn. Every business day

0:00:06.240 --> 0:00:10.360
<v Speaker 1>we bring you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts,

0:00:10.400 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 1>along with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets

0:00:13.600 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts,

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:21.239
<v Speaker 1>and on Bloomberg dot com. Prior to the pandemic, I

0:00:21.280 --> 0:00:24.040
<v Speaker 1>think we were kind of used to seeing dollar strength

0:00:24.040 --> 0:00:26.680
<v Speaker 1>here talking about the d X Y index trading at

0:00:26.760 --> 0:00:30.720
<v Speaker 1>or near that level. Since over the last several months,

0:00:30.720 --> 0:00:33.320
<v Speaker 1>pulled back to get a sense of where currencies are

0:00:33.360 --> 0:00:36.239
<v Speaker 1>headed going forward. We love to chat with Dr Win Thin,

0:00:36.640 --> 0:00:40.000
<v Speaker 1>global head currency strategy for Blown Brothers Harriman, based in

0:00:40.040 --> 0:00:42.920
<v Speaker 1>New York City. Uh. Dr Thin, thanks so much for

0:00:43.040 --> 0:00:44.800
<v Speaker 1>joining us here. Give us your sense of kind of

0:00:44.840 --> 0:00:47.680
<v Speaker 1>the green back here versus some of the major trading

0:00:47.720 --> 0:00:50.960
<v Speaker 1>currencies here as we think about lower interest rates for longer,

0:00:51.080 --> 0:00:54.319
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic impact slower economic growth, How are you kind

0:00:54.320 --> 0:00:57.760
<v Speaker 1>of positioning currencies right here? Sure? Well, first of all,

0:00:57.800 --> 0:00:59.320
<v Speaker 1>thank you very much for having me if it's always

0:00:59.320 --> 0:01:02.080
<v Speaker 1>a pleasure. Um, so, you know, if you do a

0:01:02.600 --> 0:01:05.760
<v Speaker 1>uh look at the chart, weekly chart going back to

0:01:05.920 --> 0:01:09.200
<v Speaker 1>about two thousand and fifteen, you'll see the dollars pretty

0:01:09.240 --> 0:01:12.800
<v Speaker 1>much within those ranges. UM, you know, just as recently

0:01:12.840 --> 0:01:16.480
<v Speaker 1>as uh, you know, March April, we're at you know,

0:01:16.520 --> 0:01:18.600
<v Speaker 1>pretty much at the top of that range. So the

0:01:18.680 --> 0:01:21.840
<v Speaker 1>speed of its decline has been has been noteworthy. UM.

0:01:21.880 --> 0:01:25.160
<v Speaker 1>To me, it reflects two things. One is the aggressive

0:01:25.200 --> 0:01:30.000
<v Speaker 1>FED easing zero rates and incredibly um fast expansion of

0:01:30.080 --> 0:01:34.760
<v Speaker 1>balance year date, the balance she has expanded, uh, and

0:01:34.800 --> 0:01:38.360
<v Speaker 1>now we've got some worries about reopening UM here in

0:01:38.440 --> 0:01:40.600
<v Speaker 1>two three with the virus numbers still so bad. So

0:01:40.640 --> 0:01:43.160
<v Speaker 1>those two things have really worked against dollar. To me, though,

0:01:43.200 --> 0:01:46.160
<v Speaker 1>and I think I've mentioned this on on UM several

0:01:46.160 --> 0:01:48.800
<v Speaker 1>times before, I still view this as a cyclical downturn,

0:01:48.920 --> 0:01:52.080
<v Speaker 1>that is, UM, you know, between the monetary policy cycle

0:01:52.120 --> 0:01:57.120
<v Speaker 1>and economic cycle. The cycle, the cyclical factors are against

0:01:57.160 --> 0:01:58.560
<v Speaker 1>the dollar. And of course you have a lot of

0:01:58.600 --> 0:02:01.440
<v Speaker 1>experts out there saying that that little decline, but I

0:02:01.480 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 1>think it's way too only to say that right now.

0:02:03.040 --> 0:02:06.440
<v Speaker 1>I I like, UM, I think the dollar will weaken

0:02:06.680 --> 0:02:08.520
<v Speaker 1>into going into two four, but we quick bottom and

0:02:08.520 --> 0:02:16.240
<v Speaker 1>two fourth the virus numbers start to get better. Well,

0:02:16.280 --> 0:02:17.840
<v Speaker 1>I was just gonna say, what does that mean for

0:02:17.880 --> 0:02:20.840
<v Speaker 1>the other currencies? Is there going to be debasement around

0:02:20.919 --> 0:02:25.640
<v Speaker 1>the globe or you know what happens? Well, a couple

0:02:25.639 --> 0:02:29.000
<v Speaker 1>of things. I think, Um, you know, you can't have

0:02:29.040 --> 0:02:31.480
<v Speaker 1>everyone have a weaker currency, right so on the other

0:02:31.480 --> 0:02:33.440
<v Speaker 1>step side of the coin with your dollar needs strong

0:02:33.520 --> 0:02:36.639
<v Speaker 1>currency elsewhere. Now right now it's being expressed a lot

0:02:36.960 --> 0:02:40.360
<v Speaker 1>in the currencies in Europe, Sterling in the euro as

0:02:40.360 --> 0:02:45.040
<v Speaker 1>well as emerging markets. So at this point, um, the

0:02:45.120 --> 0:02:48.560
<v Speaker 1>officials in Europe aren't really complaining about the strong currency.

0:02:48.560 --> 0:02:51.160
<v Speaker 1>At this point, Um, they're seeing you know, they're remember

0:02:51.200 --> 0:02:52.560
<v Speaker 1>there are there are a couple months ahead of us.

0:02:52.639 --> 0:02:54.800
<v Speaker 1>They've been able to reopen albeit it uh, you know,

0:02:54.840 --> 0:02:57.200
<v Speaker 1>it's body and they know having reverse from time to time.

0:02:57.240 --> 0:02:59.320
<v Speaker 1>But they're a little bit further along in the economic cycles,

0:02:59.400 --> 0:03:00.520
<v Speaker 1>so I think they can have a bit of a

0:03:00.720 --> 0:03:05.200
<v Speaker 1>stronger currency. So you know, long run the dollar, weaker

0:03:05.280 --> 0:03:07.720
<v Speaker 1>dollar could help the the U s econmy But really

0:03:07.800 --> 0:03:10.080
<v Speaker 1>what I've been focusing on is with the loss of

0:03:10.080 --> 0:03:12.200
<v Speaker 1>fiscal stillness. You know, I've seen studies that say that

0:03:12.720 --> 0:03:15.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, the the enhanced the employment benefits was pumping

0:03:15.960 --> 0:03:18.359
<v Speaker 1>somewhere anywhere between two and fifty billion to a trillion

0:03:18.360 --> 0:03:20.720
<v Speaker 1>dollars where the steam was in the economy, and that's

0:03:20.840 --> 0:03:23.080
<v Speaker 1>being a fell off a cliff. Um. The sooner we

0:03:23.120 --> 0:03:25.280
<v Speaker 1>get that started, the better. But that's why I'm a

0:03:25.280 --> 0:03:27.679
<v Speaker 1>bit negative on the dollar in the US economy. Two three,

0:03:27.680 --> 0:03:31.040
<v Speaker 1>we have massive headwinds really between the virus and the

0:03:31.240 --> 0:03:35.880
<v Speaker 1>loss of fiscal stimulus. So are you not particularly optimistic

0:03:35.920 --> 0:03:40.960
<v Speaker 1>that Congress will deliver a fourth round of stimulus? Well, okay,

0:03:41.000 --> 0:03:43.560
<v Speaker 1>I was confident a couple of weeks going on because

0:03:43.560 --> 0:03:45.240
<v Speaker 1>I thought, okay, look, we don election coming out. Who

0:03:45.320 --> 0:03:47.920
<v Speaker 1>wants to play these games? But both sides of dug

0:03:47.960 --> 0:03:51.720
<v Speaker 1>in much longer I expected. So at this point, Um,

0:03:51.760 --> 0:03:53.240
<v Speaker 1>I think we'll know more with the weekend. I'm not

0:03:53.240 --> 0:03:55.440
<v Speaker 1>sure if you've following it, but the House was called

0:03:55.480 --> 0:03:59.680
<v Speaker 1>back for emergency stat sessions to vote on postal UH

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:03.280
<v Speaker 1>service aid and protections. And I know that some of

0:04:03.320 --> 0:04:06.560
<v Speaker 1>the in some of the people in um speaker closest

0:04:06.600 --> 0:04:09.880
<v Speaker 1>caucus been pushing her to use this opportunity to restart

0:04:09.920 --> 0:04:13.080
<v Speaker 1>the talks. So you know, it's it's a fluid situation,

0:04:13.120 --> 0:04:16.359
<v Speaker 1>but you know that's feeling that they'll eventually get something past,

0:04:16.880 --> 0:04:20.720
<v Speaker 1>probably something watered down. Um, so again another reason to

0:04:20.760 --> 0:04:22.480
<v Speaker 1>be a little bit cautious about the U. S. Economy.

0:04:22.560 --> 0:04:24.640
<v Speaker 1>But um, you know this is not the time we're

0:04:24.640 --> 0:04:27.520
<v Speaker 1>playing politics right now. When I've been curious for several

0:04:27.560 --> 0:04:32.040
<v Speaker 1>weeks now about something slightly you know, it's definitely not

0:04:32.160 --> 0:04:34.800
<v Speaker 1>completely dull or related. And you used to cover emergin

0:04:34.839 --> 0:04:36.680
<v Speaker 1>markets and frontier markets and so on, so I know

0:04:36.760 --> 0:04:39.880
<v Speaker 1>you know all about currencies in for example, the Middle East,

0:04:40.240 --> 0:04:43.040
<v Speaker 1>where we already had a bit of a diary situation

0:04:43.120 --> 0:04:47.600
<v Speaker 1>before the very route explosion. I'm curious, how are all

0:04:47.640 --> 0:04:51.680
<v Speaker 1>these countries managing given that there is things to do

0:04:51.720 --> 0:04:55.880
<v Speaker 1>with each one that's making life more difficult, and coronavirus

0:04:55.880 --> 0:04:59.840
<v Speaker 1>acause all of them. Yes, so it's funny you used

0:04:59.800 --> 0:05:03.440
<v Speaker 1>to I just part out a piece yesterday basically pointing

0:05:03.440 --> 0:05:06.359
<v Speaker 1>out that look, with zero rates everywhere, you know, no

0:05:06.360 --> 0:05:07.719
<v Speaker 1>one has any cover. You know, I used to have

0:05:07.800 --> 0:05:09.479
<v Speaker 1>no If you know, Brazili had rates around towel percent

0:05:09.520 --> 0:05:11.440
<v Speaker 1>that would give you a litit of cover, you know, say, okay,

0:05:11.440 --> 0:05:13.080
<v Speaker 1>well I'm not crazy what's going on in Brazil, but

0:05:13.400 --> 0:05:16.040
<v Speaker 1>I get twelve percent yield That I'll go Now, we're

0:05:16.080 --> 0:05:18.360
<v Speaker 1>almost all at zero or near zero rates, so we

0:05:18.440 --> 0:05:19.960
<v Speaker 1>could go back to the square one where we're all

0:05:20.000 --> 0:05:22.479
<v Speaker 1>focusing on the fundamentals. Um. And so I think when

0:05:22.560 --> 0:05:25.599
<v Speaker 1>he continued differentiation across e m uh, you know, Brazil,

0:05:25.720 --> 0:05:27.680
<v Speaker 1>South Africa, Turkey though, those are all the high heels

0:05:27.680 --> 0:05:29.240
<v Speaker 1>that used to sort of benefit and risk on and

0:05:29.240 --> 0:05:32.320
<v Speaker 1>they just have it. Um. So my advice to emergent

0:05:32.320 --> 0:05:35.159
<v Speaker 1>market investors is just due to homework. Um. You know,

0:05:35.240 --> 0:05:37.360
<v Speaker 1>I think we're we're past the worst, but you know

0:05:37.720 --> 0:05:40.520
<v Speaker 1>we're not. We're past the stage where everyone's buying em

0:05:40.520 --> 0:05:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Willy NAILI right, it's very differentiated, and I think that's

0:05:43.320 --> 0:05:46.520
<v Speaker 1>virgency can continue. But if you don't mind, though, just

0:05:46.880 --> 0:05:50.760
<v Speaker 1>commenting on how these countries will survive this. So, yes,

0:05:50.880 --> 0:05:54.960
<v Speaker 1>the opportunities for investors maybe, but what are these countries

0:05:55.000 --> 0:05:57.720
<v Speaker 1>all going to sort of experience founding an extreme poverty

0:05:57.760 --> 0:06:03.359
<v Speaker 1>at this point? Well that yeah, that's the big question. Um.

0:06:03.400 --> 0:06:05.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think that the obviously the more developed

0:06:05.320 --> 0:06:07.600
<v Speaker 1>economies are are will be okay. You know, I'm not

0:06:07.640 --> 0:06:11.680
<v Speaker 1>worried about what's going on in Eastern Europe. Obviously Asia

0:06:11.800 --> 0:06:14.839
<v Speaker 1>much more, much better position. But yes, South, you know,

0:06:15.120 --> 0:06:19.080
<v Speaker 1>I think Africa and parts of um, you know, parts

0:06:19.120 --> 0:06:21.640
<v Speaker 1>of South America are are are really struggling. I think

0:06:21.640 --> 0:06:23.120
<v Speaker 1>that's why the I m F and World Bank of

0:06:23.320 --> 0:06:25.640
<v Speaker 1>have really been much open up the floodgates. So look,

0:06:25.680 --> 0:06:28.839
<v Speaker 1>forget about you know, conditionality, forget about you know, reformers.

0:06:28.880 --> 0:06:30.800
<v Speaker 1>We're just giving you money to to sort of get

0:06:30.800 --> 0:06:33.080
<v Speaker 1>through this. Um. You know, for a lot of these countries,

0:06:33.080 --> 0:06:35.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, especially the Middle least higher oil crisis would

0:06:35.200 --> 0:06:38.440
<v Speaker 1>be a big plus. UM and you know, they stabilized.

0:06:38.480 --> 0:06:40.080
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I think there's still some concerns about

0:06:40.120 --> 0:06:42.560
<v Speaker 1>the global economy. You know, I think China's doing okay,

0:06:42.600 --> 0:06:45.520
<v Speaker 1>but um, you know, there's still it's it's pretty clear

0:06:45.520 --> 0:06:46.880
<v Speaker 1>that this is not gonna be that the Class D

0:06:47.040 --> 0:06:48.800
<v Speaker 1>shape of cover. We you you know, we're gonna take like

0:06:48.839 --> 0:06:51.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of it's more like two steps forward, one step back. UM.

0:06:52.000 --> 0:06:54.680
<v Speaker 1>And that's that's that's gonna be tough. And I think, uh,

0:06:54.720 --> 0:06:56.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, the weaker links in the E M are

0:06:56.680 --> 0:07:01.040
<v Speaker 1>certainly gonna stuffer. Dr Win real quick thirty skins Japan,

0:07:01.040 --> 0:07:04.080
<v Speaker 1>how do you feel about the end right here? Well,

0:07:04.560 --> 0:07:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Japan economy wises it's been one of the LAGOD that's

0:07:07.400 --> 0:07:10.160
<v Speaker 1>it's actually even underploying the US that's been very, very disappointing.

0:07:10.160 --> 0:07:12.640
<v Speaker 1>In two three you have to reimpos some lockdown, but

0:07:12.680 --> 0:07:15.520
<v Speaker 1>even before that the recovery has been very spotty. So

0:07:15.760 --> 0:07:18.800
<v Speaker 1>I look for another umlug of stimulus. You know, obvious

0:07:18.880 --> 0:07:21.880
<v Speaker 1>popular areas has been plummeting, so I think we've got

0:07:21.840 --> 0:07:25.200
<v Speaker 1>another slug of fiscal stimus. Banks Japan hold given this

0:07:25.400 --> 0:07:27.320
<v Speaker 1>um sort of you know, risk on, risk off, and

0:07:27.360 --> 0:07:29.880
<v Speaker 1>I think Doligans having trouble really breaking about one those six,

0:07:30.000 --> 0:07:32.200
<v Speaker 1>So it's gonna be pi stetins one or four, one

0:07:32.280 --> 0:07:34.800
<v Speaker 1>or six rangs for a while. Dr Winton, thank you

0:07:34.880 --> 0:07:37.240
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us. Dr Winton, global head of

0:07:37.240 --> 0:07:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Currency Strategy at Brown Brothers Harriman UH based in New

0:07:40.640 --> 0:07:44.520
<v Speaker 1>York City, which appreciate on getting his thoughts on currency.

0:07:45.840 --> 0:07:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Chris Lou served as Deputy Secretary of Labor during the

0:07:48.680 --> 0:07:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Alhama administration. He was a delegate to this week's Democratic Convention.

0:07:52.840 --> 0:07:55.520
<v Speaker 1>He is now Senior Fellow at the University of Virginia

0:07:55.680 --> 0:07:59.200
<v Speaker 1>Miller Center. Chris, thanks for joining. So it was a

0:07:59.280 --> 0:08:03.320
<v Speaker 1>very emotive speech. It was a very calm and I

0:08:03.360 --> 0:08:07.320
<v Speaker 1>guess an effort being uplifting type of speech. But what

0:08:07.400 --> 0:08:10.400
<v Speaker 1>about policy? When do we hear what Joe Biden's policies

0:08:10.440 --> 0:08:16.640
<v Speaker 1>are on everything from healthcare to schools to coronavirus. Well,

0:08:16.680 --> 0:08:19.320
<v Speaker 1>I think you heard a lot last night about how

0:08:19.360 --> 0:08:22.480
<v Speaker 1>he would deal with a coronavirus pandemic. And I think

0:08:22.680 --> 0:08:25.400
<v Speaker 1>over the last a couple of weeks he's been doing

0:08:25.400 --> 0:08:28.360
<v Speaker 1>a series of policy addresses, not just on healthcare, but

0:08:28.440 --> 0:08:30.880
<v Speaker 1>I saw the economy as well. You know, last night speech,

0:08:30.880 --> 0:08:34.480
<v Speaker 1>in my mind, was last about policy than about values. Uh,

0:08:34.679 --> 0:08:37.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, his goal was the vice president's goal was

0:08:37.080 --> 0:08:40.800
<v Speaker 1>to convey a positive message, a unifying message. You know.

0:08:40.800 --> 0:08:43.640
<v Speaker 1>I thought he did a nice job of weaving in

0:08:43.720 --> 0:08:47.360
<v Speaker 1>his own biography and how his biography shapes the way

0:08:47.400 --> 0:08:49.520
<v Speaker 1>that he looks at the country and he looks at government.

0:08:49.600 --> 0:08:52.439
<v Speaker 1>So I do think you'll see more of those policy rollouts.

0:08:52.480 --> 0:08:54.680
<v Speaker 1>But I candidly, you know, I don't know that this

0:08:54.800 --> 0:08:57.240
<v Speaker 1>election is really going to turn on policy one way

0:08:57.320 --> 0:09:00.400
<v Speaker 1>or another. All right, Chris, So if it's not necessarily

0:09:00.400 --> 0:09:03.400
<v Speaker 1>going to turn on policy, what message do you think

0:09:03.480 --> 0:09:06.679
<v Speaker 1>or what strate did you expect the Democrats not just

0:09:06.800 --> 0:09:09.040
<v Speaker 1>for the presidency but up and down ticket to really

0:09:09.040 --> 0:09:12.200
<v Speaker 1>focus on this election season. Well, look, I mean, and

0:09:12.240 --> 0:09:14.680
<v Speaker 1>this is not surprising when you've got an incumbent on

0:09:14.720 --> 0:09:17.920
<v Speaker 1>the ballot. It really is a referendum on Donald Trump.

0:09:17.960 --> 0:09:23.120
<v Speaker 1>And where Democrats are aiming is using the coronavirus crisis

0:09:23.320 --> 0:09:26.559
<v Speaker 1>as an example of the failed leadership of this administration.

0:09:26.600 --> 0:09:28.800
<v Speaker 1>And you know, obviously there's a lot of other things

0:09:28.800 --> 0:09:31.959
<v Speaker 1>they can point to, both domestically and h and overseas,

0:09:32.000 --> 0:09:34.560
<v Speaker 1>but that that's sort of what they're holding up as

0:09:34.880 --> 0:09:37.760
<v Speaker 1>the prime example. You know. Look, they will obviously have

0:09:37.920 --> 0:09:41.920
<v Speaker 1>opportunities to contrast on things like healthcare, where Democrats have

0:09:42.000 --> 0:09:45.600
<v Speaker 1>a big political advantage, particularly with the Supreme Court considering

0:09:45.640 --> 0:09:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the fate of the Affordable Care Act. But really they're

0:09:48.040 --> 0:09:51.560
<v Speaker 1>pointing the straight up Donald Trump and asking voters do

0:09:51.600 --> 0:09:54.760
<v Speaker 1>you want four more years of him? How do you

0:09:54.760 --> 0:09:57.320
<v Speaker 1>think that he did last night in the sense of

0:09:57.360 --> 0:10:01.920
<v Speaker 1>appearing fully with those young vital you know, on somebody

0:10:01.960 --> 0:10:05.280
<v Speaker 1>that you could debate. You know, I look, I I've

0:10:05.679 --> 0:10:08.680
<v Speaker 1>known the Vice President for over ten years. I worked

0:10:08.720 --> 0:10:10.240
<v Speaker 1>closely with him in the White House, and I've seen

0:10:10.320 --> 0:10:12.560
<v Speaker 1>him give a lot of speeches. You know, this was

0:10:12.760 --> 0:10:15.520
<v Speaker 1>hands down the best speech I've seen him give. Um,

0:10:15.559 --> 0:10:18.040
<v Speaker 1>it was a different Joe Biden than I think people

0:10:18.200 --> 0:10:22.360
<v Speaker 1>remember from ten years ago. Uh, he's more mature, he's

0:10:22.400 --> 0:10:25.840
<v Speaker 1>more calm, he's more of a statesman. Like you know,

0:10:26.000 --> 0:10:29.520
<v Speaker 1>earlier in his tenure, the Vice President did have a

0:10:29.720 --> 0:10:31.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, a tendency to kind of go off track

0:10:31.480 --> 0:10:34.560
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. Obviously, you know, in a prepared speech

0:10:34.640 --> 0:10:37.400
<v Speaker 1>like this, Um, it's easier to sort of stay focused.

0:10:37.440 --> 0:10:39.600
<v Speaker 1>But Yeah, obviously a huge challenge is going to be

0:10:40.120 --> 0:10:43.920
<v Speaker 1>in the debates coming up starting in September. Hey, how

0:10:43.920 --> 0:10:47.040
<v Speaker 1>about christ As we think about down tickets, think about

0:10:47.040 --> 0:10:52.640
<v Speaker 1>the Senate. What's the expectation, um about the Senate? Can

0:10:52.760 --> 0:10:55.400
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats? They did? The Democrats feel that they can

0:10:55.679 --> 0:10:58.600
<v Speaker 1>really take back the Senate. You know, I think they

0:10:58.600 --> 0:11:00.319
<v Speaker 1>really do. And I think that was one of the

0:11:00.440 --> 0:11:04.080
<v Speaker 1>overum writing themes of the convention is to have really

0:11:04.120 --> 0:11:06.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of a big ticket, a big tent, which is

0:11:06.440 --> 0:11:09.400
<v Speaker 1>why you saw everyone from you know, John Kasik to

0:11:09.520 --> 0:11:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Bernie Sanders and everyone in between coming together. And I

0:11:12.840 --> 0:11:14.599
<v Speaker 1>think when you look at the kind of races that

0:11:14.640 --> 0:11:19.080
<v Speaker 1>are being run in places like Colorado, Arizona, North Carolina, UM,

0:11:19.120 --> 0:11:21.120
<v Speaker 1>they're really kind of focused on the bread and butter

0:11:21.200 --> 0:11:24.120
<v Speaker 1>issues and not just healthcare, but you know the economy

0:11:24.160 --> 0:11:27.000
<v Speaker 1>as well. And again so I think, you know, having

0:11:27.200 --> 0:11:29.800
<v Speaker 1>this big ticket approach at the top, I think helps

0:11:29.840 --> 0:11:33.679
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these um down ticket races, especially when

0:11:33.720 --> 0:11:39.720
<v Speaker 1>you start to get into places like Iowa, potentially Georgia, Montana,

0:11:39.760 --> 0:11:42.960
<v Speaker 1>which are reddish states. And I think having that big

0:11:42.960 --> 0:11:45.199
<v Speaker 1>tent approach is going to be helpful to those Democratic

0:11:45.240 --> 0:11:49.840
<v Speaker 1>candidates that said Ms McConnell will do everything in his

0:11:49.960 --> 0:11:53.040
<v Speaker 1>power and I mean everything and his power to have

0:11:53.200 --> 0:11:56.480
<v Speaker 1>that not happen. Will he be able to stop, as

0:11:56.520 --> 0:12:00.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, using any kind of stratagy? Do you do

0:12:00.320 --> 0:12:03.320
<v Speaker 1>you think, Chris Well, look, I mean we all should

0:12:03.320 --> 0:12:05.960
<v Speaker 1>be concerned about what's happening with the Post Office right

0:12:06.000 --> 0:12:08.120
<v Speaker 1>now and their hearings going on today and Monday. To

0:12:08.200 --> 0:12:10.559
<v Speaker 1>look at what all of that means. You know, people

0:12:10.640 --> 0:12:12.320
<v Speaker 1>need to come up with the strategy of how they're

0:12:12.320 --> 0:12:14.640
<v Speaker 1>going to vote. Think broadly in terms of where MITTI

0:12:14.720 --> 0:12:16.880
<v Speaker 1>connell is. Yeah, I obviously he will try to do

0:12:16.920 --> 0:12:20.400
<v Speaker 1>anything as well Democrats, but ultimately these kind of elections

0:12:20.400 --> 0:12:23.240
<v Speaker 1>tend to kind of go in waves and and ultimately

0:12:23.320 --> 0:12:26.800
<v Speaker 1>it's where the president's approval rating is and what people's

0:12:27.040 --> 0:12:29.080
<v Speaker 1>perceptions of him are that I think will not only

0:12:29.080 --> 0:12:32.400
<v Speaker 1>affect his race, but also the battle for that Senate

0:12:32.440 --> 0:12:36.839
<v Speaker 1>and House as well. So, Chris Kamala Harris, what's your

0:12:36.840 --> 0:12:40.880
<v Speaker 1>take on the selection of the senator from California. Well,

0:12:40.920 --> 0:12:43.800
<v Speaker 1>I think, first of all, she's supremely qualified. She has

0:12:43.840 --> 0:12:46.559
<v Speaker 1>held you know, not only sederal, state and local offices.

0:12:46.800 --> 0:12:49.920
<v Speaker 1>But I think it's importantly the bidens. You provide jolt

0:12:50.000 --> 0:12:52.439
<v Speaker 1>of enthusiasm, and you've seen that of the past ten

0:12:52.520 --> 0:12:56.280
<v Speaker 1>days with the Democratic base. Now, probably it doesn't ultimately

0:12:56.360 --> 0:13:00.240
<v Speaker 1>translate into anywhere votes for the Biden Harris ticket, but

0:13:00.360 --> 0:13:02.160
<v Speaker 1>what it does do is get people were like, you

0:13:02.160 --> 0:13:03.880
<v Speaker 1>know what, I'll vote for Buyden, but I may not

0:13:04.120 --> 0:13:06.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, write a check. I may not go out

0:13:06.200 --> 0:13:08.880
<v Speaker 1>and uh um and help, you know, phone bank or

0:13:08.960 --> 0:13:10.920
<v Speaker 1>text bank. And I think it will get a lot

0:13:11.000 --> 0:13:13.200
<v Speaker 1>of people more energized. And I think that's the one

0:13:13.320 --> 0:13:18.160
<v Speaker 1>area demographically where you saw Biden's UH numbers kind of lagging.

0:13:18.240 --> 0:13:21.240
<v Speaker 1>It's among people of colors and younger voters. I think

0:13:21.280 --> 0:13:24.959
<v Speaker 1>that her selection really helps them on both of those fronts. Chris,

0:13:25.040 --> 0:13:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Right now, the president is obviously lagging in the polls,

0:13:27.480 --> 0:13:29.480
<v Speaker 1>but as I mean, as soon as we start to

0:13:29.480 --> 0:13:32.400
<v Speaker 1>hear Biden speaking a lot again, you know, do you

0:13:32.440 --> 0:13:37.480
<v Speaker 1>imagine that that gap will stay as wide? You know,

0:13:38.320 --> 0:13:40.640
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to say. Um, you know, I don't think

0:13:40.679 --> 0:13:43.559
<v Speaker 1>this is going to be a traditional campaign season. I mean,

0:13:43.640 --> 0:13:46.400
<v Speaker 1>I think what we've seen over the last couple of

0:13:46.440 --> 0:13:47.840
<v Speaker 1>months I think is what we're going to see over

0:13:47.880 --> 0:13:50.480
<v Speaker 1>the next couple of months. And I think that, certainly,

0:13:50.679 --> 0:13:52.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, makes it challenging for both of us to

0:13:52.880 --> 0:13:55.480
<v Speaker 1>get their message out. I also think we're operating and

0:13:56.040 --> 0:14:00.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm such a polarized electorate right now. They're really aren't

0:14:00.280 --> 0:14:03.120
<v Speaker 1>that many undecided voters, and you know, look at the margins.

0:14:03.400 --> 0:14:06.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, what happens to the Republican Convention, probably what

0:14:06.240 --> 0:14:09.080
<v Speaker 1>happens in the debates will have some difference. But people forget,

0:14:09.280 --> 0:14:11.559
<v Speaker 1>voting really starts pretty soon. You know. I live in

0:14:11.600 --> 0:14:14.920
<v Speaker 1>the state of Virginia, and our voting starts on September eighteenth,

0:14:15.000 --> 0:14:18.360
<v Speaker 1>and so a lot of these late developing um UM

0:14:18.559 --> 0:14:21.400
<v Speaker 1>issues or or or events may not have an effect

0:14:21.440 --> 0:14:24.520
<v Speaker 1>on a lot of people. Chris Leu, thanks so much

0:14:24.520 --> 0:14:27.840
<v Speaker 1>for joining us. We always appreciate getting your thoughts in perspective.

0:14:27.920 --> 0:14:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Chris lu Senior fellow at the University of Virginia Miller Center,

0:14:33.040 --> 0:14:37.800
<v Speaker 1>also a former member of former Deputy Secretary of Labor

0:14:37.880 --> 0:14:40.480
<v Speaker 1>during the Obama administration as well. It was also a

0:14:40.600 --> 0:14:44.400
<v Speaker 1>delegate to this week's Democratic conventioned so obviously has just

0:14:44.680 --> 0:14:47.160
<v Speaker 1>really deep knowledge there of what's going on within the

0:14:47.680 --> 0:14:50.480
<v Speaker 1>Democratic Party Vanni. But I think most Democrats feel like

0:14:50.720 --> 0:14:53.800
<v Speaker 1>they did a pretty good job this week. Absolutely, and

0:14:54.000 --> 0:14:56.520
<v Speaker 1>it'll be interesting to see the r n Z next

0:14:56.560 --> 0:14:59.360
<v Speaker 1>week after the virtual extravaganza that we saw this week,

0:14:59.400 --> 0:15:01.600
<v Speaker 1>and it was really pretty well done. I mean, I

0:15:01.600 --> 0:15:05.240
<v Speaker 1>think after a couple of small hiccups on Monday night, Tuesday,

0:15:05.240 --> 0:15:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Wednesday and Thursday, when pretty smoothly, and it must have

0:15:07.680 --> 0:15:11.120
<v Speaker 1>been a huge technical exercise. Yeah, and it's I was

0:15:11.200 --> 0:15:13.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of amazing, you know, having you know how it

0:15:13.200 --> 0:15:15.640
<v Speaker 1>went off so well from a technical perspective. So give

0:15:15.720 --> 0:15:20.640
<v Speaker 1>them credit to the text traders. What keeps them up

0:15:20.640 --> 0:15:23.840
<v Speaker 1>at night? What keeps them wondering about this market? Well,

0:15:23.920 --> 0:15:26.720
<v Speaker 1>let's ask somebody who studies them and is able to

0:15:26.760 --> 0:15:30.360
<v Speaker 1>tell us with absolute scientific accuracy what exactly it is

0:15:30.440 --> 0:15:33.360
<v Speaker 1>that motivates traders day by day these days. Randy Frederick

0:15:33.440 --> 0:15:36.080
<v Speaker 1>is VP of Trading and Derivatives at the Schwab Center

0:15:36.120 --> 0:15:39.240
<v Speaker 1>for Financial Research, more than twenty five years experienced in

0:15:39.280 --> 0:15:44.400
<v Speaker 1>equity markets. But also there's there's a Trader Pulse survey

0:15:44.440 --> 0:15:48.160
<v Speaker 1>that the Center puts out, and I'm very curious, Randy,

0:15:48.160 --> 0:15:50.880
<v Speaker 1>what is it saying these days? The markets keep going

0:15:51.000 --> 0:15:55.120
<v Speaker 1>up and yet you know, everything is crumbling all around us. Well,

0:15:55.160 --> 0:15:57.560
<v Speaker 1>the most recent survey data, which we just got back

0:15:57.600 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 1>a couple of days ago, follows the survey we do

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:02.760
<v Speaker 1>it back in in March, and turns out that people

0:16:02.800 --> 0:16:06.520
<v Speaker 1>have become more bullish, which to some extent isn't terribly surprising.

0:16:06.520 --> 0:16:11.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the SPS rebounded since it bottomed on March then,

0:16:11.840 --> 0:16:14.600
<v Speaker 1>ASDEX is obviously doing even better than that. So what

0:16:14.640 --> 0:16:16.960
<v Speaker 1>we find is that momentum in the market oftentimes does

0:16:17.320 --> 0:16:19.560
<v Speaker 1>make people feel a little bit better, even though there

0:16:19.560 --> 0:16:21.760
<v Speaker 1>may be a better buying opportunity when it's at the bottom.

0:16:21.800 --> 0:16:23.920
<v Speaker 1>No one really knows that we're at the bottom until

0:16:24.000 --> 0:16:26.960
<v Speaker 1>we're already past it. So, Randy, one of the things

0:16:26.960 --> 0:16:29.360
<v Speaker 1>that you know, investors are asking themselves these days, and

0:16:29.400 --> 0:16:31.640
<v Speaker 1>we hear a lot from fund managers, is you know,

0:16:31.720 --> 0:16:34.600
<v Speaker 1>for the remainder of this year, perhaps going into if

0:16:34.640 --> 0:16:38.160
<v Speaker 1>you can kind of figure on some kind of the

0:16:38.520 --> 0:16:41.160
<v Speaker 1>other side of this pandemic is how to play it.

0:16:41.200 --> 0:16:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Do I stick with the growth stocks that have worked

0:16:43.440 --> 0:16:46.400
<v Speaker 1>for me, or do I maybe rotate into value? What's

0:16:46.440 --> 0:16:51.440
<v Speaker 1>your survey suggest Well, sometimes people do that. I mean,

0:16:51.480 --> 0:16:53.400
<v Speaker 1>the thing that's important to keep in mind is that

0:16:53.880 --> 0:16:56.320
<v Speaker 1>we don't really know when or if we're going to

0:16:56.400 --> 0:16:58.360
<v Speaker 1>get fully out of this. We we open, we have

0:16:58.480 --> 0:17:01.040
<v Speaker 1>plenty of reason to believe that will probably have a

0:17:01.120 --> 0:17:03.960
<v Speaker 1>vaccine at some point, maybe not until the beginning of

0:17:04.040 --> 0:17:07.080
<v Speaker 1>next year. UM, and if that happens, of course, what

0:17:07.440 --> 0:17:09.960
<v Speaker 1>has been the leader in the last bull market, which

0:17:10.040 --> 0:17:13.080
<v Speaker 1>lasted over eleven years, as you know, UM will likely

0:17:13.119 --> 0:17:16.720
<v Speaker 1>continue to be the leaders going forward. The one sector

0:17:16.760 --> 0:17:19.679
<v Speaker 1>that is difficult are the one area that I think

0:17:19.720 --> 0:17:21.840
<v Speaker 1>people need to be a little cautious about if they're

0:17:21.880 --> 0:17:24.760
<v Speaker 1>trying to position themselves for when we come out of

0:17:24.800 --> 0:17:28.240
<v Speaker 1>the virus is those stocks that have benefited primarily because

0:17:28.280 --> 0:17:31.560
<v Speaker 1>of it. UM. Obviously, most people are staying at home,

0:17:31.920 --> 0:17:35.080
<v Speaker 1>many people are working at home. Our leisure activities have

0:17:35.160 --> 0:17:38.639
<v Speaker 1>been curtailed dramatically, if not completely eliminated, and there are

0:17:38.640 --> 0:17:42.120
<v Speaker 1>a number of stocks that have been benefited from that

0:17:42.160 --> 0:17:45.960
<v Speaker 1>particular trend. While I do think that more people will

0:17:46.000 --> 0:17:48.160
<v Speaker 1>probably work at home after the virus than they ever

0:17:48.200 --> 0:17:50.520
<v Speaker 1>did previous to that, it's going to be nowhere near

0:17:50.520 --> 0:17:52.879
<v Speaker 1>what we see right now. So some of those that

0:17:52.880 --> 0:17:55.800
<v Speaker 1>have benefited greatly are likely to find a little bit

0:17:55.840 --> 0:17:57.800
<v Speaker 1>of softness, But the ones that have been the leaders

0:17:57.840 --> 0:18:01.760
<v Speaker 1>all along throughout the cyclical periods will likely continue to

0:18:01.800 --> 0:18:04.359
<v Speaker 1>be the leaders going forward once we get out of this.

0:18:06.119 --> 0:18:11.320
<v Speaker 1>What sectors will be the most volatile, do traders think? Well?

0:18:11.359 --> 0:18:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Traders have told us that they believe the volatility is

0:18:14.160 --> 0:18:18.600
<v Speaker 1>likely UM to get to be the most, probably in financials,

0:18:18.600 --> 0:18:21.040
<v Speaker 1>which is interesting and part of the reason I think. Obviously,

0:18:21.240 --> 0:18:25.000
<v Speaker 1>financials have been UM the second worse performer year to date,

0:18:25.040 --> 0:18:27.080
<v Speaker 1>and part of the reason for that is the fact

0:18:27.119 --> 0:18:30.080
<v Speaker 1>that UH interest rates are at zero, and as you recall,

0:18:30.200 --> 0:18:33.399
<v Speaker 1>j Palell said, not only UM are we not raising rates,

0:18:33.400 --> 0:18:36.080
<v Speaker 1>we're not even thinking about thinking about raising rates, And

0:18:36.119 --> 0:18:38.520
<v Speaker 1>of course that means not only are rates going to

0:18:38.560 --> 0:18:40.320
<v Speaker 1>be zero by the end of this year, they're likely

0:18:40.359 --> 0:18:42.000
<v Speaker 1>to be zero by the end of next year and

0:18:42.040 --> 0:18:46.000
<v Speaker 1>perhaps even time after that. Financials, for the most part,

0:18:46.160 --> 0:18:48.639
<v Speaker 1>make a large portion of their revenue from the interest

0:18:48.720 --> 0:18:50.639
<v Speaker 1>rate spread, and as the spread as the race go

0:18:50.760 --> 0:18:54.840
<v Speaker 1>down and stay at or near zero, that spread between

0:18:54.920 --> 0:18:58.240
<v Speaker 1>what they pay on balances and what they charge on

0:18:58.320 --> 0:19:00.679
<v Speaker 1>loans gets compressed, and so it is just simply not

0:19:00.720 --> 0:19:04.000
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity there. On the positive side, though, for financials,

0:19:04.160 --> 0:19:06.600
<v Speaker 1>when markets are volatile, trade volumes tend to go up,

0:19:06.600 --> 0:19:09.439
<v Speaker 1>and we have seen that here and recently so. But

0:19:09.440 --> 0:19:11.040
<v Speaker 1>the interest rate spreads a bigger piece of it, and

0:19:11.040 --> 0:19:13.199
<v Speaker 1>it affects a larger number of them. So that's the

0:19:13.200 --> 0:19:15.440
<v Speaker 1>one they're most concerned about. In the second one, um

0:19:15.560 --> 0:19:18.600
<v Speaker 1>is health care. Health Care has been a has been

0:19:18.640 --> 0:19:22.960
<v Speaker 1>the third best performer year to date, but healthcare always

0:19:23.119 --> 0:19:25.520
<v Speaker 1>has uncertainty when we have an election. You saw a

0:19:25.560 --> 0:19:28.800
<v Speaker 1>similar trend in healthcare prior to the two thousand and

0:19:28.840 --> 0:19:32.240
<v Speaker 1>sixteen election. There's a lot of discussion on both sides,

0:19:32.960 --> 0:19:35.800
<v Speaker 1>both from both candidates about how they would like to

0:19:35.920 --> 0:19:40.080
<v Speaker 1>change health care, and so it creates a level of uncertainty.

0:19:40.119 --> 0:19:41.679
<v Speaker 1>It's not so much that they're sure it's going to

0:19:41.680 --> 0:19:44.359
<v Speaker 1>go down. It's that they're not sure what's going to happen,

0:19:44.359 --> 0:19:47.159
<v Speaker 1>and that is actually the exact definition of volatility. We

0:19:47.200 --> 0:19:50.639
<v Speaker 1>know it's going to move, we just don't know which direction. So, Randy,

0:19:50.720 --> 0:19:53.760
<v Speaker 1>from your survey work, what's the economic backdrop that most

0:19:53.760 --> 0:19:57.920
<v Speaker 1>traders are kind of thinking about right now? Well, I mean,

0:19:57.960 --> 0:20:00.600
<v Speaker 1>we ask traders what they think the shape the recovery

0:20:00.640 --> 0:20:03.680
<v Speaker 1>will be. But sometimes that one's a little difficult to decipher.

0:20:03.680 --> 0:20:06.040
<v Speaker 1>And the reason I say that is that people have

0:20:06.080 --> 0:20:09.680
<v Speaker 1>a tendency to to equate the market with the economy,

0:20:09.800 --> 0:20:11.840
<v Speaker 1>and the two aren't the exact same thing. Even people

0:20:11.880 --> 0:20:13.520
<v Speaker 1>at the high levels of government do that on a

0:20:13.520 --> 0:20:18.200
<v Speaker 1>regular basis. I often remind people that the economy tends

0:20:18.240 --> 0:20:21.240
<v Speaker 1>to run about six to eighteen months behind the markets,

0:20:21.560 --> 0:20:23.960
<v Speaker 1>and you can see that regularly when you think about

0:20:24.000 --> 0:20:27.600
<v Speaker 1>back on March, most of the economic data was terrible.

0:20:27.600 --> 0:20:30.200
<v Speaker 1>In fact, much of it hasn't even hadn't even bottomed yet,

0:20:30.320 --> 0:20:32.760
<v Speaker 1>and yet the market had turned around and began to

0:20:32.800 --> 0:20:34.640
<v Speaker 1>move higher, and we're up, like I said, more than

0:20:35.840 --> 0:20:37.439
<v Speaker 1>you can go back to two thousand and nine, and

0:20:37.480 --> 0:20:39.320
<v Speaker 1>it was the same thing in March of two thousand

0:20:39.320 --> 0:20:41.240
<v Speaker 1>and nine. The market began to rebound. By the end

0:20:41.280 --> 0:20:44.200
<v Speaker 1>of the year, it was up, but the economic data

0:20:44.280 --> 0:20:47.600
<v Speaker 1>didn't recover until many months later, some of it even

0:20:47.640 --> 0:20:49.479
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years later. We didn't see a bottom

0:20:49.480 --> 0:20:52.520
<v Speaker 1>in the housing market until two thousand and eleven. So

0:20:52.600 --> 0:20:54.920
<v Speaker 1>it's a similar thing. So oftentimes, when you ask people

0:20:54.960 --> 0:20:57.320
<v Speaker 1>what they think about the economy, they actually give you

0:20:57.359 --> 0:21:00.159
<v Speaker 1>their response of what they think about the markets. And

0:21:00.200 --> 0:21:02.080
<v Speaker 1>that's partly because I can look at a chart of

0:21:02.119 --> 0:21:05.240
<v Speaker 1>the sp see a very distinctive v bottom on March

0:21:05.320 --> 0:21:08.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty three, but I can't see that in economic data.

0:21:09.119 --> 0:21:11.639
<v Speaker 1>I can see it in an individual economic report, but

0:21:11.680 --> 0:21:14.119
<v Speaker 1>there's so many of them. Right, But think about the

0:21:14.160 --> 0:21:17.320
<v Speaker 1>housing market, think about the labor market. We know the

0:21:17.400 --> 0:21:21.040
<v Speaker 1>labor market on on a weekly basis has bottomed, but

0:21:21.280 --> 0:21:23.640
<v Speaker 1>it's nowhere near where it was prior to the virus.

0:21:23.720 --> 0:21:25.640
<v Speaker 1>And the unemployment rates, on the other hand, which are

0:21:25.720 --> 0:21:28.120
<v Speaker 1>very lagging indicators, we won't see a bottom on those

0:21:28.160 --> 0:21:30.800
<v Speaker 1>for at least another month. Right. Hey, Randy, thanks so

0:21:30.880 --> 0:21:34.640
<v Speaker 1>much for joinings. We always appreciate getting this information. Randy Frederick,

0:21:34.720 --> 0:21:37.920
<v Speaker 1>vice president of Trading and Derivatives for the Schwab Center

0:21:37.960 --> 0:21:41.439
<v Speaker 1>for Financial Research, calling in from Austin, Texas. With that

0:21:41.560 --> 0:21:45.439
<v Speaker 1>survey work on what traders are looking for both in

0:21:45.520 --> 0:21:50.720
<v Speaker 1>terms of the economic outlook and markets. It is time

0:21:50.760 --> 0:21:54.320
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg Opinion. We welcome Timothy O'Brien, senior columnists for

0:21:54.400 --> 0:21:58.119
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Opinion. Tim, you're out with a fantastic come this morning,

0:21:58.119 --> 0:22:00.119
<v Speaker 1>which I read it first thing this morning. To any

0:22:00.160 --> 0:22:03.159
<v Speaker 1>three questions for the Postmaster General, I'd love for you

0:22:03.240 --> 0:22:05.160
<v Speaker 1>to kind of share with us kind of the real

0:22:05.240 --> 0:22:07.240
<v Speaker 1>important ones that you think need to be asked at

0:22:07.240 --> 0:22:09.720
<v Speaker 1>some point today. Uh. Well, I mean, I think the

0:22:09.760 --> 0:22:13.240
<v Speaker 1>most crucial thing to voters right now is is did

0:22:13.280 --> 0:22:17.080
<v Speaker 1>anyone in the federal government direct the Postmaster General Louis

0:22:17.119 --> 0:22:19.840
<v Speaker 1>de Joy to take steps that would have slowed down

0:22:20.320 --> 0:22:25.880
<v Speaker 1>mail delivery? Um? By intent? Um? Now. DeJoy has said

0:22:25.920 --> 0:22:29.960
<v Speaker 1>already in his testimony this morning that um, nothing he

0:22:30.000 --> 0:22:33.720
<v Speaker 1>did was designed to slow down mail delivery. It was

0:22:34.400 --> 0:22:36.720
<v Speaker 1>just part of his efforts to streamline the post office,

0:22:36.720 --> 0:22:39.199
<v Speaker 1>which he is said all along. But there's been a

0:22:39.200 --> 0:22:44.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of contradictory statements. Also in his testimony he said that, um,

0:22:44.400 --> 0:22:46.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, he promised midweek that he would roll back

0:22:46.800 --> 0:22:50.239
<v Speaker 1>some of these changes. Um. Uh. One of the most

0:22:50.280 --> 0:22:54.280
<v Speaker 1>significant is the removal or dismantling of big mail sorting machines.

0:22:54.680 --> 0:22:56.399
<v Speaker 1>But then he said in his testimony this morning that

0:22:56.400 --> 0:22:59.560
<v Speaker 1>he had no intention of putting those back, and yet

0:22:59.640 --> 0:23:02.119
<v Speaker 1>later his testimony he said he actually had no idea

0:23:02.720 --> 0:23:06.560
<v Speaker 1>how maintenance operations and those machines work anyways. It's handled regionally.

0:23:06.960 --> 0:23:11.320
<v Speaker 1>So um, you know, there's a House hearing today, are

0:23:11.400 --> 0:23:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Senate hearing today and a House hearing on Monday. I

0:23:13.760 --> 0:23:16.800
<v Speaker 1>would hope members of Congress in the House will take

0:23:16.840 --> 0:23:20.919
<v Speaker 1>some cues from the proceedings today to sharpen their questions

0:23:20.920 --> 0:23:23.800
<v Speaker 1>on Monday. Yes, you write him, the legitimacy of mail

0:23:23.840 --> 0:23:26.359
<v Speaker 1>and voting and the outcome of the presidential election hang

0:23:26.520 --> 0:23:30.240
<v Speaker 1>in the balance. The thing is, you have this man,

0:23:30.320 --> 0:23:33.560
<v Speaker 1>this Postmaster General, a generous political donor, not just a

0:23:33.600 --> 0:23:36.600
<v Speaker 1>president rum but also to other Republicans like Mitch McConnell,

0:23:36.600 --> 0:23:40.359
<v Speaker 1>for example. How motivated will Republicans in the Senate Committee

0:23:40.400 --> 0:23:43.720
<v Speaker 1>and the House Oversight Committee b to actually figuring out

0:23:43.720 --> 0:23:46.440
<v Speaker 1>what the truth is? Well, I mean that's always the

0:23:46.560 --> 0:23:49.159
<v Speaker 1>question in the hearing. Vanny, you know it's a Senate

0:23:49.240 --> 0:23:53.159
<v Speaker 1>led committee today, I mean, rather a Republican led Senate

0:23:53.200 --> 0:23:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Committee today, and they agreed to have the hearings, and

0:23:55.080 --> 0:23:58.240
<v Speaker 1>it's a bipartisan hearing and and there are robots questions

0:23:58.280 --> 0:24:02.440
<v Speaker 1>being asked. Um. But the main problem with these hearings

0:24:02.520 --> 0:24:06.760
<v Speaker 1>is sometimes legislators would rather grandstand than just actually prosecute

0:24:06.760 --> 0:24:09.840
<v Speaker 1>a case and ask a rapid fire round of yes

0:24:09.920 --> 0:24:13.879
<v Speaker 1>or no questions. I think for our business listeners, you know,

0:24:13.920 --> 0:24:16.160
<v Speaker 1>for our listeners who care about the vote. I mentioned

0:24:16.200 --> 0:24:19.080
<v Speaker 1>that asking about mail and bounting is an important question.

0:24:19.320 --> 0:24:22.320
<v Speaker 1>I think for our business listeners. Uh. There's been another

0:24:22.359 --> 0:24:24.960
<v Speaker 1>issue hanging over the Postal Service since the spring, is

0:24:25.000 --> 0:24:28.359
<v Speaker 1>to whether or not Trump is attacking the Post Office

0:24:28.840 --> 0:24:32.280
<v Speaker 1>and what it charges for package deliveries, specifically to target

0:24:32.320 --> 0:24:35.840
<v Speaker 1>companies like Amazon and other e commerce companies that rely

0:24:35.920 --> 0:24:39.080
<v Speaker 1>on the Postal Service to deliver packages. Um. There is

0:24:39.160 --> 0:24:42.840
<v Speaker 1>no proof that that package delill be the money loser

0:24:43.119 --> 0:24:46.359
<v Speaker 1>for the USPS. In fact, it's one of their bright spots.

0:24:46.359 --> 0:24:50.359
<v Speaker 1>It's a revenue builder and uh and and and it's profitable.

0:24:50.960 --> 0:24:53.760
<v Speaker 1>So they should just ask to Joy about that and

0:24:53.800 --> 0:24:56.639
<v Speaker 1>put that issue to rest because the wrong issues are

0:24:56.680 --> 0:24:58.560
<v Speaker 1>being put into play about what needs to be done

0:24:58.600 --> 0:25:01.880
<v Speaker 1>to fix the Post Office and tim there's probably I'm

0:25:01.880 --> 0:25:04.000
<v Speaker 1>not sure if it's a misperception, but a belief that

0:25:04.040 --> 0:25:07.240
<v Speaker 1>the postal service is a kind of similar to a

0:25:07.280 --> 0:25:10.240
<v Speaker 1>company a corporation, that it should in fact generate a profit.

0:25:10.680 --> 0:25:14.679
<v Speaker 1>But like other government services, the military, for example, it

0:25:14.720 --> 0:25:17.919
<v Speaker 1>doesn't necessarily generate a profit, nor is it necessarily supposed to.

0:25:17.960 --> 0:25:20.800
<v Speaker 1>How do we how should we think about that? Well?

0:25:20.840 --> 0:25:26.560
<v Speaker 1>I suggested that, um, the legislators ask the Postmaster General,

0:25:26.600 --> 0:25:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Louis de joy um if it also is problematic that

0:25:31.920 --> 0:25:37.320
<v Speaker 1>the military, public schools, police and fired apartment, fire departments,

0:25:37.400 --> 0:25:40.280
<v Speaker 1>and the White House itself aren't profitable. Because it gets

0:25:40.280 --> 0:25:42.880
<v Speaker 1>to some of the absurdity of this. We have institutions

0:25:42.880 --> 0:25:46.159
<v Speaker 1>in our society that exists to provide a service that

0:25:46.280 --> 0:25:50.200
<v Speaker 1>we support with taxpayer dollars, and in fact, the post

0:25:50.200 --> 0:25:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Office isn't even supported by taxpayer dollars itself, sustaining through

0:25:54.000 --> 0:25:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the post postage charges it it levies. It's running a deficit,

0:25:59.080 --> 0:26:02.680
<v Speaker 1>a massive one in that needs to be fixed. But um,

0:26:02.720 --> 0:26:05.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, we we have these things considered common goods

0:26:05.440 --> 0:26:07.240
<v Speaker 1>that we all share in, and it's a service that

0:26:07.280 --> 0:26:10.800
<v Speaker 1>we all benefit from, including the postal service and holding

0:26:10.840 --> 0:26:14.320
<v Speaker 1>the operations of the military or the Postal Service, you know,

0:26:14.359 --> 0:26:17.679
<v Speaker 1>to the same accounting standards as a private entity is

0:26:17.680 --> 0:26:22.639
<v Speaker 1>is can be very absurd. So Tim, you know, you

0:26:22.680 --> 0:26:25.879
<v Speaker 1>mentioned how package deliveries are actually profitable. It looks like

0:26:25.920 --> 0:26:28.840
<v Speaker 1>although we don't really have, I suppose a full idea

0:26:28.880 --> 0:26:32.639
<v Speaker 1>of the accounts, but people like Treasury secretari Student Milution,

0:26:32.680 --> 0:26:35.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they must have a better idea than anybody.

0:26:35.160 --> 0:26:38.040
<v Speaker 1>What's going on at the Postal Service. Do you think

0:26:38.119 --> 0:26:41.399
<v Speaker 1>they're in contact with the Postmaster General? Well, I mean

0:26:41.600 --> 0:26:44.080
<v Speaker 1>that's a real issue because the body, because the Postal

0:26:44.119 --> 0:26:46.359
<v Speaker 1>Service is supposed to be independent. It exists within the

0:26:46.480 --> 0:26:49.639
<v Speaker 1>executive branch, but it is overseen by a board of

0:26:49.880 --> 0:26:53.280
<v Speaker 1>bipartisan board of governors, and it's meant to be independent

0:26:53.359 --> 0:26:56.840
<v Speaker 1>from political influence, very much in the same way as

0:26:56.880 --> 0:27:00.920
<v Speaker 1>the Federal Reserve operates, and Minutution shouldn't be in touch

0:27:01.000 --> 0:27:03.880
<v Speaker 1>with them. But we're in a moment right now. Manuchan

0:27:03.960 --> 0:27:10.240
<v Speaker 1>controls the purse springs. The Cares Act allocated um uh

0:27:10.440 --> 0:27:14.479
<v Speaker 1>ten billion dollars in the spring for the Postal Service

0:27:14.560 --> 0:27:17.679
<v Speaker 1>that Manuchan and Trump have refused release to the Postal

0:27:17.720 --> 0:27:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Service to shore up its operations in the midst of

0:27:21.160 --> 0:27:23.920
<v Speaker 1>the damage from the pandemic that many institutions are facing,

0:27:24.160 --> 0:27:27.240
<v Speaker 1>and so Manutian and Trump have leverage over this institution

0:27:27.320 --> 0:27:31.199
<v Speaker 1>financially right now in an unusual way. And the argument

0:27:31.280 --> 0:27:33.560
<v Speaker 1>is then, is that they're they're using it to play politics.

0:27:33.560 --> 0:27:36.119
<v Speaker 1>That's an argument I happen to agree with. All right,

0:27:36.119 --> 0:27:39.080
<v Speaker 1>we will follow the hearing today. Nathan Hager is listening

0:27:39.119 --> 0:27:41.600
<v Speaker 1>to it as we speak, and of course we'll be

0:27:41.600 --> 0:27:43.240
<v Speaker 1>back on top of it on Monday as well. But

0:27:43.280 --> 0:27:46.280
<v Speaker 1>this isn't over for sure. Tim O'Brien, thanks for joining us.

0:27:46.320 --> 0:27:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Would love to have got your thoughts on the DNC

0:27:48.640 --> 0:27:50.560
<v Speaker 1>this week, the RNC next week and so on, but

0:27:50.720 --> 0:27:52.120
<v Speaker 1>we have more time to do that. That That is timbo

0:27:52.160 --> 0:27:56.000
<v Speaker 1>the O'Brien, senior columnist for Bloomberg Opinion and once again

0:27:56.280 --> 0:27:59.480
<v Speaker 1>the Postmaster General, appearing before I send it Homeland Security

0:27:59.520 --> 0:28:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Committee hearing today. You'll say, or has said already, that

0:28:03.160 --> 0:28:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Congress is at bold for the agency's dire financial situation

0:28:06.119 --> 0:28:10.919
<v Speaker 1>because lawmakers hadn't enacted changes that would allow the agency

0:28:10.960 --> 0:28:13.280
<v Speaker 1>to get on a sustainable path. But of course that's

0:28:13.320 --> 0:28:15.919
<v Speaker 1>just really the beginning of what's going to be spoken of.

0:28:17.440 --> 0:28:20.879
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe

0:28:20.920 --> 0:28:24.400
<v Speaker 1>and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast

0:28:24.480 --> 0:28:27.720
<v Speaker 1>platform you prefer. I'm Bonnie Quinn, I'm on Twitter at

0:28:27.720 --> 0:28:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Bonnie Quinn, and I'm Paul Sweeney. I'm on Twitter at

0:28:30.080 --> 0:28:32.960
<v Speaker 1>pt Sweeney. Before the podcast, you can always catch us

0:28:33.000 --> 0:28:34.440
<v Speaker 1>worldwide at Bloomberg Radio