WEBVTT - Can The Center Hold After Charlie Kirk? Plus: Shutdown Strategy

0:00:15.564 --> 0:00:29.324
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin. Welcome back to Risky Business, a show about making

0:00:29.364 --> 0:00:32.044
<v Speaker 1>better decisions. I'm Maria Kanakova.

0:00:31.604 --> 0:00:34.284
<v Speaker 2>And I'm Nate Silver. Today on the show, it's a

0:00:34.364 --> 0:00:38.644
<v Speaker 2>politics focused episode. We're going to talk about the story

0:00:38.684 --> 0:00:39.964
<v Speaker 2>we think we have to talk about, at least a

0:00:40.004 --> 0:00:45.004
<v Speaker 2>little bit, the assassination of Charlie Kirk, the conservative influencer,

0:00:45.444 --> 0:00:50.164
<v Speaker 2>a tragic and scary event, and we're going to carefully

0:00:50.204 --> 0:00:51.844
<v Speaker 2>have a little bit of a heart to heart about it,

0:00:51.964 --> 0:00:54.804
<v Speaker 2>and then we're going to talk about more pedestrian politics,

0:00:54.804 --> 0:00:58.684
<v Speaker 2>talk about the potential looming government shut down in Washington

0:00:58.884 --> 0:01:01.924
<v Speaker 2>and what both parties might be strategizing about for that.

0:01:02.244 --> 0:01:05.084
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think this is going to be an interesting episode,

0:01:05.124 --> 0:01:09.884
<v Speaker 1>a really interesting conversation. And also for our listener, this

0:01:10.004 --> 0:01:12.844
<v Speaker 1>is going to be the first week where we are

0:01:12.884 --> 0:01:16.164
<v Speaker 1>going to a twice weekly schedule of Risky Business, so

0:01:16.644 --> 0:01:18.804
<v Speaker 1>we will now be in your feed twice a week.

0:01:19.124 --> 0:01:22.084
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, we hope you enjoy that, and we'd love

0:01:22.124 --> 0:01:28.764
<v Speaker 1>to hear your feedback about how you think it's going.

0:01:31.644 --> 0:01:34.004
<v Speaker 1>On that note, Nate, let's turn too. You know what

0:01:34.124 --> 0:01:37.044
<v Speaker 1>is I think on the I mean on the more

0:01:37.084 --> 0:01:40.084
<v Speaker 1>serious side of topics period, but in terms of the

0:01:40.124 --> 0:01:43.164
<v Speaker 1>types of things we talk about at Risky Business. It's

0:01:43.164 --> 0:01:45.724
<v Speaker 1>definitely on the very serious end of that, which is

0:01:45.764 --> 0:01:49.644
<v Speaker 1>the assassination of Charlie Kirk. And you had actually met Charlie, right, Nate.

0:01:49.924 --> 0:01:50.764
<v Speaker 2>I never met Charlie.

0:01:50.844 --> 0:01:50.884
<v Speaker 1>No.

0:01:50.964 --> 0:01:54.524
<v Speaker 2>I think he sent me a DM once and invited

0:01:54.564 --> 0:01:56.844
<v Speaker 2>me on his show when it said something that riled

0:01:56.924 --> 0:02:02.244
<v Speaker 2>up Democrats, and I ignore most invites if we're being honest,

0:02:02.244 --> 0:02:05.004
<v Speaker 2>it was nothing personal. But yeah, I'm sure. Look, I

0:02:05.644 --> 0:02:08.084
<v Speaker 2>wrote a piece at my sub stack about this, which

0:02:08.084 --> 0:02:10.284
<v Speaker 2>is kind of how, you know, you don't have to

0:02:10.284 --> 0:02:13.164
<v Speaker 2>say anything. Why don't people just kind of be more restrained?

0:02:13.164 --> 0:02:15.564
<v Speaker 2>And maybe we're violating that here. I'm not sure. Look,

0:02:15.724 --> 0:02:18.484
<v Speaker 2>I do think that there is I called it like

0:02:18.484 --> 0:02:20.764
<v Speaker 2>an implicit fraternity, I guess a slightly gendered term, but

0:02:20.804 --> 0:02:25.444
<v Speaker 2>an ocur about like people who comment about politics for

0:02:25.524 --> 0:02:28.324
<v Speaker 2>a living right and people who are in the public

0:02:28.364 --> 0:02:31.084
<v Speaker 2>eye and obviously you go on Twitter or Blue Sky

0:02:31.164 --> 0:02:34.684
<v Speaker 2>whatever else. Right, there's a lot of debate about what

0:02:34.764 --> 0:02:39.204
<v Speaker 2>type of political citizen Charlie Kirk was. But but still,

0:02:39.684 --> 0:02:41.524
<v Speaker 2>when somebody is assassinate and I mean, you know, I

0:02:41.684 --> 0:02:45.444
<v Speaker 2>spoke at a in an open public forum in ames Ioweat.

0:02:45.444 --> 0:02:50.204
<v Speaker 2>I was at university two days after Kirk was killed,

0:02:50.524 --> 0:02:54.244
<v Speaker 2>So I mean, it's not not in my head to

0:02:54.284 --> 0:02:57.244
<v Speaker 2>be looking out at the crowd. And you know, when

0:02:57.244 --> 0:03:00.164
<v Speaker 2>you get the weird questions later after the show, it's like, Okay,

0:03:00.164 --> 0:03:02.044
<v Speaker 2>what's going on here? And you know, I mean, I

0:03:02.084 --> 0:03:05.484
<v Speaker 2>don't know. I've certainly gotten death threats before. But but

0:03:07.084 --> 0:03:09.084
<v Speaker 2>I mean, Charlie Kirk is also a little bit hard

0:03:09.204 --> 0:03:12.284
<v Speaker 2>to characterize, right. I was struggling with whether to call

0:03:12.364 --> 0:03:18.524
<v Speaker 2>him an activist or an organizer or a provocateur, or

0:03:18.564 --> 0:03:25.204
<v Speaker 2>an intellectual or a media personality, right or what exactly.

0:03:25.284 --> 0:03:28.764
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure it is actually a perfectly comparable figure

0:03:29.644 --> 0:03:32.044
<v Speaker 2>on the left, because the left and right are asymmetric,

0:03:32.124 --> 0:03:36.244
<v Speaker 2>but like someone who was very influential right, who kind

0:03:36.284 --> 0:03:41.004
<v Speaker 2>of like bridged the gap between when he was friends

0:03:41.404 --> 0:03:43.484
<v Speaker 2>I think, just not friendly, but I think Trump would

0:03:43.484 --> 0:03:46.644
<v Speaker 2>call him a friend with Trump himself right, and had

0:03:46.724 --> 0:03:49.164
<v Speaker 2>like a quite large audience.

0:03:49.444 --> 0:03:52.564
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think whatever we call him, Nate. What I

0:03:52.564 --> 0:03:55.524
<v Speaker 1>would like to stress is he was someone who exercised

0:03:55.564 --> 0:04:00.924
<v Speaker 1>his First Amendment right incredibly well, eloquently and freely, as

0:04:00.964 --> 0:04:03.204
<v Speaker 1>he should have been able to do. And I do

0:04:03.364 --> 0:04:07.404
<v Speaker 1>want to stress a truly important point, which is that

0:04:07.924 --> 0:04:11.324
<v Speaker 1>we can't conflate speech violence right like people love to

0:04:11.324 --> 0:04:14.724
<v Speaker 1>say that, oh, speech can be violence. No violence is violence.

0:04:15.004 --> 0:04:17.164
<v Speaker 1>Whether or not you agree with Charlie Kirk or you

0:04:17.244 --> 0:04:20.284
<v Speaker 1>disagree with him, he was practicing free speech. He was

0:04:20.364 --> 0:04:23.404
<v Speaker 1>engaging in debate. And that's something that you know, we

0:04:23.444 --> 0:04:25.604
<v Speaker 1>should be doing in a democracy, right. We should be

0:04:25.684 --> 0:04:28.604
<v Speaker 1>talking to people we agree with, we should be talking

0:04:28.604 --> 0:04:32.044
<v Speaker 1>to people we disagree with, we should be having conversations.

0:04:32.164 --> 0:04:36.644
<v Speaker 1>That's the backbone of critical thinking, that's the backbone of progress,

0:04:36.684 --> 0:04:41.324
<v Speaker 1>that's a backbone of society. And the fact that someone

0:04:41.404 --> 0:04:46.044
<v Speaker 1>can be assassinated for exercising free speech is something that

0:04:46.084 --> 0:04:49.244
<v Speaker 1>should absolutely never happen. And as you say, nay, you

0:04:49.324 --> 0:04:52.964
<v Speaker 1>were doing an event right afterwards, and it definitely I

0:04:52.964 --> 0:04:55.644
<v Speaker 1>think as someone you know we both do public events,

0:04:55.684 --> 0:04:59.724
<v Speaker 1>we both do public speaking, I think it changes your

0:04:59.924 --> 0:05:04.364
<v Speaker 1>kind of risk calculus, risk framing when you see, oh

0:05:04.404 --> 0:05:06.324
<v Speaker 1>my god, have we gotten to the point in a

0:05:06.324 --> 0:05:09.804
<v Speaker 1>society where people think that this is okay, that this

0:05:09.884 --> 0:05:13.204
<v Speaker 1>is a legitimate response, that if I disagree with someone,

0:05:13.684 --> 0:05:15.204
<v Speaker 1>you know, violence is okay.

0:05:15.684 --> 0:05:20.484
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And there's also a chilling absolutely right, huge chilling

0:05:20.724 --> 0:05:23.524
<v Speaker 2>people with what they say and also whether they get invited.

0:05:23.564 --> 0:05:27.924
<v Speaker 2>I mean, one case with some questionable similarities, but Sam

0:05:27.924 --> 0:05:30.324
<v Speaker 2>and Reshti was attacked at a big festival in rural

0:05:30.364 --> 0:05:33.124
<v Speaker 2>New York a couple of years ago. There was a

0:05:33.124 --> 0:05:36.644
<v Speaker 2>flat blaw against him, and I suppose that was of

0:05:36.644 --> 0:05:39.084
<v Speaker 2>a chilly partly fulfilled, right, and.

0:05:39.084 --> 0:05:41.324
<v Speaker 1>He almost died. By the way, he was incredibly lucky

0:05:41.364 --> 0:05:43.484
<v Speaker 1>to survive. People thought he was going to die. He

0:05:43.564 --> 0:05:45.764
<v Speaker 1>has lost vision and what I it was. You know,

0:05:45.804 --> 0:05:47.964
<v Speaker 1>it was a very very close call, but that could

0:05:48.004 --> 0:05:49.324
<v Speaker 1>have very easily gone the other way.

0:05:49.524 --> 0:05:52.884
<v Speaker 2>But you know, part of the joy, I guess of

0:05:52.964 --> 0:05:56.164
<v Speaker 2>doing an event in a community, particularly a smaller community,

0:05:56.244 --> 0:05:58.244
<v Speaker 2>is that the doors are open, right, you know, I

0:05:58.484 --> 0:06:01.044
<v Speaker 2>have have you been to a political convention like the

0:06:01.084 --> 0:06:02.764
<v Speaker 2>Democratic Republican convention before?

0:06:03.404 --> 0:06:04.204
<v Speaker 1>I never have, No.

0:06:05.004 --> 0:06:10.124
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the security is incredible, Like it takes an

0:06:10.124 --> 0:06:12.044
<v Speaker 2>hour to get in there, it takes twenty minutes to

0:06:12.044 --> 0:06:15.964
<v Speaker 2>get out of there, right there is it's very cumbersome

0:06:16.124 --> 0:06:19.204
<v Speaker 2>and in some ways it's like not very conducive to

0:06:20.804 --> 0:06:23.644
<v Speaker 2>political protests or political speech, right, And of course parties

0:06:23.644 --> 0:06:27.964
<v Speaker 2>that want to suppress political protests often use threats of

0:06:28.084 --> 0:06:30.244
<v Speaker 2>violence as an excuse to say, Okay, we don't want

0:06:30.244 --> 0:06:34.244
<v Speaker 2>you people protesting about Gaza or Bernie Sanders or whatever

0:06:34.324 --> 0:06:36.284
<v Speaker 2>else in the convention halls, so we can't let you

0:06:36.324 --> 0:06:42.884
<v Speaker 2>in for security reasons. But yeah, I mean, look, in

0:06:42.884 --> 0:06:47.844
<v Speaker 2>some ways, there's not that much to say about if

0:06:47.844 --> 0:06:52.084
<v Speaker 2>you don't know him, about Charlie Kirk, the you know

0:06:52.124 --> 0:06:54.164
<v Speaker 2>what I mean, Like I don't there's this whole game

0:06:54.564 --> 0:07:00.884
<v Speaker 2>about like using this as a positioning exercise for where

0:07:00.924 --> 0:07:05.404
<v Speaker 2>people fit into the discourse. And I don't know. It's

0:07:06.244 --> 0:07:08.364
<v Speaker 2>I was fucking shot like on a university. Get this

0:07:08.524 --> 0:07:11.324
<v Speaker 2>in cold blood, right, It's like you know, I mean,

0:07:11.484 --> 0:07:13.604
<v Speaker 2>I you know, no one even has the pretense anymore

0:07:13.724 --> 0:07:18.204
<v Speaker 2>of Oh, let's quote unquote not politicize this. And by definition,

0:07:18.884 --> 0:07:21.164
<v Speaker 2>although there's a little bit of ambiguity still, and like

0:07:21.204 --> 0:07:24.004
<v Speaker 2>the shooter's motivations, I wouldn't say that much necessarily, but

0:07:24.084 --> 0:07:28.244
<v Speaker 2>some right, by definition, and an assassination is a a

0:07:28.324 --> 0:07:34.604
<v Speaker 2>political act, right, And you know, I think this is

0:07:34.604 --> 0:07:37.244
<v Speaker 2>becoming more common. There's something to beat about that fact, right,

0:07:37.284 --> 0:07:39.204
<v Speaker 2>But like, you know, I don't know. I mean, it

0:07:39.244 --> 0:07:46.204
<v Speaker 2>was just last year when when Trump cat shot and

0:07:46.244 --> 0:07:47.684
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to be a little joking about it because

0:07:47.684 --> 0:07:49.604
<v Speaker 2>he survived, and that was kind of the mood about it, right,

0:07:49.604 --> 0:07:51.404
<v Speaker 2>he had that that, you know, I had just busted

0:07:51.444 --> 0:07:54.924
<v Speaker 2>out of a tournament poker tournament Balted's poker. I'm like, Maria,

0:07:54.924 --> 0:07:57.244
<v Speaker 2>I won't see you for dinner because I busted out,

0:07:57.284 --> 0:07:59.604
<v Speaker 2>and I think somebody just shut Trump. But immediately it

0:07:59.644 --> 0:08:03.364
<v Speaker 2>was clear that Trump hadn't survived and had this triumphant moment,

0:08:03.444 --> 0:08:05.044
<v Speaker 2>and so it was almost you know, I was kind

0:08:05.084 --> 0:08:07.004
<v Speaker 2>of out wandering around on the strip getting a sad

0:08:07.004 --> 0:08:09.484
<v Speaker 2>little dinner with the other people who busted out, and

0:08:09.524 --> 0:08:12.164
<v Speaker 2>people there were kind of excited, right, It's like, oh,

0:08:12.164 --> 0:08:15.804
<v Speaker 2>that's cool, he survived, right, And that kind of detracted

0:08:15.804 --> 0:08:19.644
<v Speaker 2>from the magnitude of what that event had been and

0:08:19.684 --> 0:08:22.084
<v Speaker 2>how scary that could have been. And I think you're

0:08:24.044 --> 0:08:28.444
<v Speaker 2>you're seeing now, yeah, what happens when you create somebody

0:08:28.444 --> 0:08:30.164
<v Speaker 2>who can be a martyr potentially.

0:08:30.724 --> 0:08:32.684
<v Speaker 1>And I'll go a step further, and Nate, I think

0:08:32.724 --> 0:08:38.284
<v Speaker 1>that that was a precursor to another moment that people

0:08:38.564 --> 0:08:42.124
<v Speaker 1>made light of, which was the December assassination of Brian Thompson,

0:08:42.164 --> 0:08:45.804
<v Speaker 1>the CEO of United Healthcare. Right where people actually made

0:08:46.124 --> 0:08:51.764
<v Speaker 1>Luigima Joon into kind of this hero, right folk hero, like, yes,

0:08:51.804 --> 0:08:54.884
<v Speaker 1>you went after the bad guys, and we talked about

0:08:54.924 --> 0:08:57.484
<v Speaker 1>it on the pod back then, where like, holy shit, guys,

0:08:57.524 --> 0:09:00.164
<v Speaker 1>this is a horrible reaction, like this is not what

0:09:00.204 --> 0:09:02.004
<v Speaker 1>you should be I don't care what you think about

0:09:02.364 --> 0:09:05.524
<v Speaker 1>you know, healthcare in America or what you think about

0:09:05.604 --> 0:09:08.284
<v Speaker 1>United or all of these things. This is not the answer,

0:09:08.644 --> 0:09:11.124
<v Speaker 1>right violence that like, this is not okay, This is

0:09:11.284 --> 0:09:14.684
<v Speaker 1>never something to be celebrated, and yet people were celebrating it.

0:09:14.924 --> 0:09:17.004
<v Speaker 1>So I think that we've seen kind of this progression

0:09:17.444 --> 0:09:19.804
<v Speaker 1>that in some ways has led us to this moment

0:09:19.844 --> 0:09:22.284
<v Speaker 1>where you think, oh, you know, first of all, this

0:09:22.364 --> 0:09:24.884
<v Speaker 1>is the right way to solve it, and secondly, like

0:09:24.924 --> 0:09:27.764
<v Speaker 1>I could even be a hero right for killing someone

0:09:27.804 --> 0:09:30.284
<v Speaker 1>who you know, people disagreed with or thought they did

0:09:30.284 --> 0:09:33.684
<v Speaker 1>something bad. And it's just so profoundly fucked up to

0:09:34.124 --> 0:09:37.444
<v Speaker 1>think in those terms and to think that this is

0:09:37.644 --> 0:09:40.484
<v Speaker 1>just something you do. Right. This is why we have society,

0:09:40.524 --> 0:09:42.084
<v Speaker 1>This is why we have laws, This is why we

0:09:42.164 --> 0:09:45.484
<v Speaker 1>have norms of behavior, This is why we live, you know,

0:09:45.524 --> 0:09:48.924
<v Speaker 1>in a civilization and not in the wild West, where

0:09:48.964 --> 0:09:51.044
<v Speaker 1>the way that you solve things was to duke it

0:09:51.044 --> 0:09:51.724
<v Speaker 1>out with guns.

0:09:52.964 --> 0:09:55.844
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, look the way I kind of look at civilization.

0:09:56.044 --> 0:09:58.284
<v Speaker 2>Like again, it's amazing that you're in New York and

0:09:58.284 --> 0:10:00.124
<v Speaker 2>it's a city of eight billion people and everyone has

0:10:00.124 --> 0:10:01.724
<v Speaker 2>different objectives on their mind, and there is lots of

0:10:01.724 --> 0:10:04.404
<v Speaker 2>petty crime from day to day and other things, and

0:10:04.484 --> 0:10:08.724
<v Speaker 2>yet the kind of center holds, right, But the center

0:10:08.724 --> 0:10:11.084
<v Speaker 2>holds I think some narrowly right where you have a

0:10:11.124 --> 0:10:14.004
<v Speaker 2>lot of I'm going to confuse centrifugal and centripetal. Right,

0:10:14.084 --> 0:10:18.084
<v Speaker 2>you have a lot of forces pulling out into chaos.

0:10:18.204 --> 0:10:23.924
<v Speaker 2>Then you have forces holding people together, including policing, including

0:10:24.884 --> 0:10:28.964
<v Speaker 2>common decency, including common sense, right, and kind of everything

0:10:29.044 --> 0:10:31.324
<v Speaker 2>in between, and like it might not take that much

0:10:31.364 --> 0:10:33.804
<v Speaker 2>for things to fall out of equilibrium. And maybe and

0:10:33.844 --> 0:10:36.524
<v Speaker 2>maybe social media is that. And you know, I don't

0:10:36.564 --> 0:10:41.764
<v Speaker 2>think things have calmed down very much on Twitter, right,

0:10:44.804 --> 0:10:48.604
<v Speaker 2>I've covered a lot of news stories and like five

0:10:48.684 --> 0:10:50.764
<v Speaker 2>days no matter what the story is of things not

0:10:50.804 --> 0:10:55.444
<v Speaker 2>calming down, it's a little unusual, right. You know, you

0:10:55.484 --> 0:11:02.244
<v Speaker 2>also have people who are getting fired for saying thoughtless

0:11:02.324 --> 0:11:04.524
<v Speaker 2>or I was gonna say un pc which is I mean,

0:11:04.564 --> 0:11:06.444
<v Speaker 2>I think it is kind of like a political correctness issue,

0:11:06.524 --> 0:11:09.684
<v Speaker 2>right if people fired for saying things that in some

0:11:09.764 --> 0:11:13.804
<v Speaker 2>cases are I think stupid and tone.

0:11:13.564 --> 0:11:18.324
<v Speaker 1>Deaf, but like still a fireable effects, like yeah, look in.

0:11:18.324 --> 0:11:22.244
<v Speaker 2>Some of them. You know, Matthew Dowd is my former

0:11:23.164 --> 0:11:26.404
<v Speaker 2>ABC News colleague, and I think Matthew Dowd's a lowheart

0:11:26.404 --> 0:11:28.324
<v Speaker 2>and an idiot, But I think you should be fired

0:11:28.364 --> 0:11:30.404
<v Speaker 2>for being a low heart and an idiot in general

0:11:30.444 --> 0:11:33.204
<v Speaker 2>about almost every issue that he weighs in on, and

0:11:33.524 --> 0:11:36.244
<v Speaker 2>not on a short preparation TV hit when it wasn't

0:11:36.244 --> 0:11:39.884
<v Speaker 2>clear what had happened about saying Okay, well, this guy

0:11:40.004 --> 0:11:42.524
<v Speaker 2>was kind of encouraging what I mean. You know, I

0:11:42.564 --> 0:11:44.644
<v Speaker 2>don't think his comment is correct, but it's also like

0:11:46.084 --> 0:11:50.324
<v Speaker 2>it's within the realm of free speech that I think

0:11:50.404 --> 0:11:53.484
<v Speaker 2>Charlie Kirk is relatively not hit theocritical about free speech

0:11:53.524 --> 0:11:58.164
<v Speaker 2>and would have wanted right to support absolutely absolutely.

0:11:58.204 --> 0:11:59.924
<v Speaker 1>And this goes back to what you said at the

0:11:59.924 --> 0:12:02.884
<v Speaker 1>beginning night, which I think we should just stress a

0:12:02.884 --> 0:12:05.804
<v Speaker 1>little bit more, which is the chilling effect of this right,

0:12:06.124 --> 0:12:08.604
<v Speaker 1>the effect that this has on free speech more broadly,

0:12:08.884 --> 0:12:11.324
<v Speaker 1>on what both feel like they can and can't say,

0:12:12.124 --> 0:12:15.004
<v Speaker 1>and the fact that there are now these like very

0:12:15.044 --> 0:12:18.884
<v Speaker 1>strong repercussions for rights that you should have right and

0:12:18.964 --> 0:12:21.764
<v Speaker 1>even going a step further. So there was a piece

0:12:21.804 --> 0:12:24.964
<v Speaker 1>in New York Times that pointed out that defend Secretary

0:12:25.004 --> 0:12:28.924
<v Speaker 1>Pete Hegseth had said that the agency was monitoring and

0:12:28.964 --> 0:12:33.244
<v Speaker 1>tracking any military personnel who celebrated or mocked Kirk's death,

0:12:33.684 --> 0:12:37.364
<v Speaker 1>and Christopher Landau, the Deputy Secretary of State, said that

0:12:37.444 --> 0:12:40.844
<v Speaker 1>the administration would be stripping visas from any individuals who

0:12:40.884 --> 0:12:45.244
<v Speaker 1>celebrated Kirk's death. So you know, this is like it's

0:12:45.324 --> 0:12:48.564
<v Speaker 1>going further and further right from oh, you might be

0:12:48.644 --> 0:12:52.004
<v Speaker 1>fired to you might have your visa taken away, and

0:12:52.044 --> 0:12:55.124
<v Speaker 1>I've I mean, that's frightening. Everything about this moment is frightening.

0:12:55.364 --> 0:12:57.444
<v Speaker 1>I want to also point out something that you mentioned

0:12:57.484 --> 0:12:59.964
<v Speaker 1>about New York and like the fact that New York

0:13:00.044 --> 0:13:03.244
<v Speaker 1>functions and sometimes you think, oh, how precarious is that?

0:13:03.564 --> 0:13:06.204
<v Speaker 1>There's actually a lot of work in psychology that shows

0:13:06.204 --> 0:13:09.804
<v Speaker 1>that it is quite precarious. Right, Social norms are per careus,

0:13:10.164 --> 0:13:14.324
<v Speaker 1>that norms of behavior are precarious, that we are often

0:13:14.764 --> 0:13:17.884
<v Speaker 1>kind of walking on a razor's edge where it can

0:13:17.924 --> 0:13:21.124
<v Speaker 1>go in one direction or another, depending on what prominent

0:13:21.164 --> 0:13:24.204
<v Speaker 1>people say, you know, depending on what people think that

0:13:24.284 --> 0:13:27.964
<v Speaker 1>these things do shift and can shift very rapidly. So

0:13:27.964 --> 0:13:30.484
<v Speaker 1>I think we should just remember that, you know, social

0:13:30.484 --> 0:13:33.164
<v Speaker 1>norms that we take for granted, we shouldn't take for

0:13:33.204 --> 0:13:36.884
<v Speaker 1>granted they they do need to be protected, or we

0:13:36.964 --> 0:13:39.684
<v Speaker 1>might end up devolving, which is what I think we're

0:13:39.804 --> 0:13:58.764
<v Speaker 1>witnessing right now speaking about, you know, the increased political

0:13:58.884 --> 0:14:02.004
<v Speaker 1>violence security, I think this is a good moment to

0:14:02.564 --> 0:14:06.404
<v Speaker 1>shift gears a little bit and talk about the potential

0:14:06.484 --> 0:14:09.644
<v Speaker 1>government shut down and funding because one of the things

0:14:09.644 --> 0:14:12.324
<v Speaker 1>that is happening is that the White House has requested

0:14:12.604 --> 0:14:15.764
<v Speaker 1>fifty eight million dollars in security funding for both the

0:14:15.804 --> 0:14:21.764
<v Speaker 1>executive and the judicial branches after Charlie Kirk's assassination. And

0:14:22.244 --> 0:14:29.164
<v Speaker 1>this is basically they're trying to insert this as part

0:14:29.164 --> 0:14:32.844
<v Speaker 1>of the stop gap bill to prevent a government shutdown,

0:14:33.204 --> 0:14:36.684
<v Speaker 1>which is looming on October first. So this is clearly

0:14:36.724 --> 0:14:39.724
<v Speaker 1>something that is being used. I don't know if it's

0:14:39.764 --> 0:14:42.644
<v Speaker 1>being used as a pretext or if this is actually

0:14:43.244 --> 0:14:46.964
<v Speaker 1>something that they should be doing, but it's interesting that

0:14:47.284 --> 0:14:51.964
<v Speaker 1>this is making its way from something that happened last

0:14:52.004 --> 0:14:56.244
<v Speaker 1>week to something that is a key provision in a

0:14:56.284 --> 0:14:59.484
<v Speaker 1>bill that can prevent the shutting down of the government, which,

0:14:59.524 --> 0:15:02.164
<v Speaker 1>by the way, night, I feel like we have an

0:15:02.204 --> 0:15:06.204
<v Speaker 1>impending government shutdown. So frequently these days.

0:15:05.964 --> 0:15:08.164
<v Speaker 2>Should I get a quick background or for I have

0:15:08.204 --> 0:15:10.924
<v Speaker 2>a story place down? So like in the spring, was

0:15:10.964 --> 0:15:15.444
<v Speaker 2>it March or whatever? In the spring, Republicans had to

0:15:15.444 --> 0:15:19.964
<v Speaker 2>pass a continuing resolution to keep the government open. People

0:15:19.964 --> 0:15:21.684
<v Speaker 2>thought that bill might get stimied in the House with

0:15:21.764 --> 0:15:24.484
<v Speaker 2>the gup he has a very narrow majority, and they

0:15:24.524 --> 0:15:26.684
<v Speaker 2>passed it party line vote, I think, with one exception

0:15:26.844 --> 0:15:29.364
<v Speaker 2>on each side. It went to the Senate, where for

0:15:29.524 --> 0:15:32.804
<v Speaker 2>that type of legislation the filibuster is still under the

0:15:32.884 --> 0:15:37.004
<v Speaker 2>rules of the Senate. So ultimately Democrats debated to shut down.

0:15:37.084 --> 0:15:40.364
<v Speaker 2>Public commentators debate a shutdown. I actually wrote a post

0:15:40.404 --> 0:15:42.364
<v Speaker 2>I guess it was after they didn't, after Schumer had

0:15:42.404 --> 0:15:44.844
<v Speaker 2>conceded it was about to concede, saying Democrats should have

0:15:44.924 --> 0:15:46.724
<v Speaker 2>had a shutdown. I thought it was good opportunity. I

0:15:46.724 --> 0:15:49.124
<v Speaker 2>thought they could highlight dough spending cuts and take advantage

0:15:49.124 --> 0:15:53.564
<v Speaker 2>of Elam Musk's on popularity. But Schumer and what was it,

0:15:53.684 --> 0:15:56.684
<v Speaker 2>you know, seven or so other Democrats voted for cloture

0:15:56.724 --> 0:16:00.484
<v Speaker 2>to and a filibuster, and so therefore the bill passed. However,

0:16:00.604 --> 0:16:03.604
<v Speaker 2>that resolution was for six months, and it expires at

0:16:03.604 --> 0:16:06.004
<v Speaker 2>the end of this month, September. Say, thirty first, I

0:16:06.044 --> 0:16:07.484
<v Speaker 2>think this how many days this is? Had?

0:16:07.644 --> 0:16:07.684
<v Speaker 1>Have?

0:16:08.284 --> 0:16:11.484
<v Speaker 2>Thirty September thirtieth.

0:16:11.804 --> 0:16:13.924
<v Speaker 1>I remember night. I think I told you about my

0:16:14.044 --> 0:16:17.444
<v Speaker 1>little uh the little thing that you can use.

0:16:17.524 --> 0:16:19.964
<v Speaker 2>I know, yeah, you know. September feels like a thirty

0:16:20.044 --> 0:16:22.844
<v Speaker 2>one though, right, it's a pretty fucking important month. September

0:16:23.404 --> 0:16:24.244
<v Speaker 2>might be the best month.

0:16:24.364 --> 0:16:26.564
<v Speaker 1>It is an important month. It's such a great weather month,

0:16:26.644 --> 0:16:29.004
<v Speaker 1>back to school month. I love September. But it's a

0:16:29.084 --> 0:16:33.004
<v Speaker 1>thirty day month. Unfortunately, good things never last night, good things.

0:16:33.004 --> 0:16:38.964
<v Speaker 2>Never last Okay, uh, sorry I lost Okay, So anyway,

0:16:39.044 --> 0:16:41.764
<v Speaker 2>this time though, it's Democrats October one.

0:16:41.964 --> 0:16:44.084
<v Speaker 1>October one is when the government would shut down.

0:16:44.604 --> 0:16:47.204
<v Speaker 2>This time though, it's Democrats who seem to want to

0:16:47.244 --> 0:16:50.724
<v Speaker 2>shut down. So Chuck Schumer indicated late last week that

0:16:52.044 --> 0:16:55.884
<v Speaker 2>he had canvassed his caucus and they are inclined.

0:16:55.964 --> 0:17:01.884
<v Speaker 1>That sounds really inappropriate. Well, you canvass my caucus. Sorry, sorry, guys,

0:17:01.924 --> 0:17:06.364
<v Speaker 1>this is important. Oh all right, So he'd canvassed his caucus.

0:17:06.124 --> 0:17:10.204
<v Speaker 2>Yes, and there was appetite in the credit caucus to

0:17:10.364 --> 0:17:16.404
<v Speaker 2>make demands. I suppose about healthcare, they want to extend

0:17:16.444 --> 0:17:20.044
<v Speaker 2>Obamacare subsidies in Medicaid and restore Medicaid cuts that were

0:17:20.044 --> 0:17:22.724
<v Speaker 2>made in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act not my

0:17:22.884 --> 0:17:25.164
<v Speaker 2>term for it, the official piece they have the legislation.

0:17:25.684 --> 0:17:29.404
<v Speaker 2>And meanwhile, lots of center and left of center commentators,

0:17:29.484 --> 0:17:33.284
<v Speaker 2>from as Reclined to Robert Wright to everybody else's been saying, yeah,

0:17:33.324 --> 0:17:37.684
<v Speaker 2>we need a fight. Democrats can't concede to this, although

0:17:37.684 --> 0:17:40.204
<v Speaker 2>they don't really agree on the whys or the what's

0:17:40.844 --> 0:17:44.244
<v Speaker 2>exactly right, but there's agreement that something must be done.

0:17:44.924 --> 0:17:47.324
<v Speaker 2>That Schumer was so much of a pushover last time

0:17:47.844 --> 0:17:49.804
<v Speaker 2>that this is one of the few points Democrats have leverage.

0:17:49.804 --> 0:17:51.124
<v Speaker 2>I when you want to cash that in for like

0:17:51.244 --> 0:17:55.444
<v Speaker 2>a big media moment or for actual concessions, that you

0:17:55.564 --> 0:17:57.004
<v Speaker 2>have to it's time to do something.

0:17:58.204 --> 0:18:00.604
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, I think that Schumer learned his lesson

0:18:00.684 --> 0:18:02.484
<v Speaker 1>a little too well from the last time, when he

0:18:02.604 --> 0:18:06.724
<v Speaker 1>got such horrible coverage, such horrible press for making the

0:18:06.844 --> 0:18:09.324
<v Speaker 1>deal right where he said, look, I'm just I'm doing

0:18:09.564 --> 0:18:12.964
<v Speaker 1>what needs to be done, and he came off looking terrible.

0:18:13.084 --> 0:18:15.124
<v Speaker 1>But I think that the other strategic moment, and I'm

0:18:15.164 --> 0:18:17.444
<v Speaker 1>not writing a piece about this night, so please, you know,

0:18:17.524 --> 0:18:21.204
<v Speaker 1>feel free to chime in, is I think that Democrats

0:18:21.244 --> 0:18:24.324
<v Speaker 1>are seeing this as a moment where they can really

0:18:25.324 --> 0:18:30.084
<v Speaker 1>start creating kind of new messaging for mid term elections

0:18:30.404 --> 0:18:34.404
<v Speaker 1>and for you know, for presidential elections moving forward, to

0:18:34.484 --> 0:18:36.804
<v Speaker 1>say that, you know, we are the true party that's

0:18:36.844 --> 0:18:39.604
<v Speaker 1>protecting the people. Right. The reason that we're doing this

0:18:39.844 --> 0:18:43.324
<v Speaker 1>is we want you to have your healthcare, your medicare.

0:18:43.404 --> 0:18:45.044
<v Speaker 1>We want it not to be cut. You know, we

0:18:45.244 --> 0:18:48.524
<v Speaker 1>want all of these benefits that are being lost with

0:18:48.644 --> 0:18:51.604
<v Speaker 1>rural communities for the working man of America. We want

0:18:51.644 --> 0:18:53.644
<v Speaker 1>to protect this and that's what we're trying to fight for.

0:18:54.244 --> 0:18:56.204
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's also part of the messaging and

0:18:56.284 --> 0:18:58.364
<v Speaker 1>part of the things that they are trying to make

0:18:58.404 --> 0:19:02.724
<v Speaker 1>sure get changed in the reconciliation before the bill moves forward.

0:19:03.644 --> 0:19:05.724
<v Speaker 2>I mean, there are different theories, right, I mean, look,

0:19:05.804 --> 0:19:07.684
<v Speaker 2>partly it's like are yousing there with like the chest

0:19:07.764 --> 0:19:11.204
<v Speaker 2>tern slugs zugs wing. I don't know how to say it,

0:19:11.284 --> 0:19:12.484
<v Speaker 2>and yeah, I.

0:19:12.604 --> 0:19:18.844
<v Speaker 1>Have read it, but let's explain it. Because my familiarity

0:19:18.964 --> 0:19:21.684
<v Speaker 1>is very passing, to the point where I too, Nate,

0:19:21.804 --> 0:19:22.964
<v Speaker 1>do not know how to pronounce it.

0:19:22.964 --> 0:19:26.924
<v Speaker 2>It's a situation where every move you make is worse

0:19:27.044 --> 0:19:30.564
<v Speaker 2>than no move, right, that you would prefer that it

0:19:30.684 --> 0:19:34.724
<v Speaker 2>was your opponent's turn. And like so, like let's say

0:19:34.924 --> 0:19:39.564
<v Speaker 2>Democrats supplied the votes for the Continuing Resolution, I mean,

0:19:40.684 --> 0:19:44.164
<v Speaker 2>you know, and try to de escalate this. I mean

0:19:44.684 --> 0:19:47.044
<v Speaker 2>you know, I mean they would look like pushovers. Schumer

0:19:47.044 --> 0:19:49.284
<v Speaker 2>in particular. I mean, first of all, he is up

0:19:49.324 --> 0:19:52.164
<v Speaker 2>for reelection, not next year, but in twenty twenty eight.

0:19:52.844 --> 0:19:54.404
<v Speaker 2>You have a lot of people coming after Schumer. Right,

0:19:54.444 --> 0:19:58.404
<v Speaker 2>there are lots of you know, to state obvious names,

0:19:58.444 --> 0:20:01.924
<v Speaker 2>AOC she doesn't run for president, for example, or Zaren

0:20:02.404 --> 0:20:05.084
<v Speaker 2>who knows, right, can't be president because he was born

0:20:05.164 --> 0:20:06.484
<v Speaker 2>U gone it, but he could run for Senate, right,

0:20:06.524 --> 0:20:12.164
<v Speaker 2>But a lot of talented and all the MSNBC loving Democrats. Right,

0:20:12.204 --> 0:20:14.124
<v Speaker 2>But there's gonna be a lot of demand for Chuck

0:20:14.164 --> 0:20:19.364
<v Speaker 2>Schumer's seat, right, and as well as if he survives electorally,

0:20:19.844 --> 0:20:22.404
<v Speaker 2>then maybe his role as majority leader and so he

0:20:22.524 --> 0:20:26.204
<v Speaker 2>kind of I think has to do something right. And

0:20:26.284 --> 0:20:30.164
<v Speaker 2>the kind of Ezra Cline argument is that if you

0:20:30.364 --> 0:20:34.484
<v Speaker 2>supply votes for this continuing resolution. Are you not tacitly

0:20:34.804 --> 0:20:40.644
<v Speaker 2>endorsing this government that you say is authoritarian and acting

0:20:40.724 --> 0:20:44.284
<v Speaker 2>in bad faith and corrupt even before you get to

0:20:44.364 --> 0:20:48.364
<v Speaker 2>the fact that they are evscerating a lot of priorities

0:20:48.404 --> 0:20:53.004
<v Speaker 2>that Democrats hold deer and I kind of buy that.

0:20:53.364 --> 0:20:55.844
<v Speaker 2>I kind of buy that as a default in politics,

0:20:55.924 --> 0:20:58.884
<v Speaker 2>that doing the thing that you believe in and or

0:20:59.164 --> 0:21:02.844
<v Speaker 2>is consistent with your overall messaging. Right. I think that's worthwhile,

0:21:03.004 --> 0:21:06.724
<v Speaker 2>and we've seen I think repeatedly that like Democrats, sometimes

0:21:06.884 --> 0:21:09.324
<v Speaker 2>the rhetoric exceeds that they're actually willing to do. Right.

0:21:09.444 --> 0:21:11.004
<v Speaker 2>I think we've talked about so many times, don't have

0:21:11.004 --> 0:21:12.324
<v Speaker 2>to draw on it anymore. I think if they have

0:21:12.404 --> 0:21:17.484
<v Speaker 2>really regarded Trump two point zero was an essential threat,

0:21:17.524 --> 0:21:21.364
<v Speaker 2>they might have thought more carefully about about how fit

0:21:21.444 --> 0:21:23.004
<v Speaker 2>Biden was to run for a second term. They might

0:21:23.004 --> 0:21:24.684
<v Speaker 2>have thought more carefully about whe Kamala Harris was the

0:21:24.764 --> 0:21:27.884
<v Speaker 2>optimal person to replace him, and so to sound whatever,

0:21:28.044 --> 0:21:29.804
<v Speaker 2>might have thought more carefully about We've been through all

0:21:29.884 --> 0:21:33.044
<v Speaker 2>that on this program before, Right, But like you know, so,

0:21:33.124 --> 0:21:37.604
<v Speaker 2>I support the notion that like put your money where

0:21:37.604 --> 0:21:39.084
<v Speaker 2>your mouth is. On the other hand, there's like not

0:21:39.204 --> 0:21:42.764
<v Speaker 2>really a good endgame for democrats here. I don't think

0:21:42.804 --> 0:21:45.124
<v Speaker 2>it's not clear what endgame they want, right, because on

0:21:45.204 --> 0:21:48.364
<v Speaker 2>the one hand, I think that Ezra Calase is more

0:21:48.564 --> 0:21:52.564
<v Speaker 2>like we just want to have change the narrative, change

0:21:52.564 --> 0:21:54.524
<v Speaker 2>the discords. And by the way, Trumps approval rating is

0:21:54.604 --> 0:21:56.764
<v Speaker 2>not really moving very much, right, So like it's like

0:21:56.884 --> 0:21:59.844
<v Speaker 2>not like he's in some stings. It's about a net

0:21:59.924 --> 0:22:04.124
<v Speaker 2>negative seven negative eight, right, So it's like, you know whatever,

0:22:04.364 --> 0:22:07.964
<v Speaker 2>forty three percent approved, fifty one percent disapprove, somewhere in

0:22:08.044 --> 0:22:10.404
<v Speaker 2>that range, right, And it's not really moved. It has

0:22:10.444 --> 0:22:12.444
<v Speaker 2>not moved because of Jeffrey Epstein. That has not moved

0:22:12.444 --> 0:22:16.364
<v Speaker 2>because of of of whatever scandals there are. Right, we

0:22:16.404 --> 0:22:18.084
<v Speaker 2>don't have any data yet. We'll be affected by the

0:22:18.204 --> 0:22:21.804
<v Speaker 2>Charlie Kirk the first segment, right, But like it did

0:22:21.884 --> 0:22:25.084
<v Speaker 2>seem to move for tariffs about three months ago or

0:22:25.124 --> 0:22:27.364
<v Speaker 2>excuse me, six months ago during Liberation Day was a

0:22:27.404 --> 0:22:30.124
<v Speaker 2>big drop in April, and it's been steady since then.

0:22:30.204 --> 0:22:32.804
<v Speaker 2>And so like, you know, there is a notion of

0:22:32.884 --> 0:22:37.844
<v Speaker 2>increasing variants for democrats, I think, and kind of changing

0:22:37.884 --> 0:22:41.924
<v Speaker 2>the discourse, changing the dialogue. But you know, here's the issue.

0:22:41.924 --> 0:22:44.844
<v Speaker 2>I mean, if you offer a deal on healthcare, the

0:22:44.924 --> 0:22:46.484
<v Speaker 2>problem is it's kind of a deal that like might

0:22:46.564 --> 0:22:48.444
<v Speaker 2>be good for the GOP, you know what I mean,

0:22:48.804 --> 0:22:55.004
<v Speaker 2>where like all these swing state representatives might say, yeah, actually,

0:22:55.004 --> 0:22:59.204
<v Speaker 2>I'm pretty uncomfortable with these Medicaid cuts, right, and Okay,

0:22:59.284 --> 0:23:00.884
<v Speaker 2>I'll take the I'll take the deal, right.

0:23:03.044 --> 0:23:03.204
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:23:03.244 --> 0:23:04.604
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if Trump would sign it, but.

0:23:04.764 --> 0:23:08.204
<v Speaker 1>Like now, I think I think some of the biggest

0:23:08.964 --> 0:23:13.044
<v Speaker 1>losses in medical coverage are happening in states like Arizona.

0:23:13.404 --> 0:23:16.564
<v Speaker 1>We're somewhere around like three hundred thousand people are set

0:23:16.604 --> 0:23:20.684
<v Speaker 1>to lose coverage under the big beautiful bill come October first,

0:23:20.724 --> 0:23:23.604
<v Speaker 1>of changes aren't made, and Arizona is obviously a state

0:23:23.644 --> 0:23:29.644
<v Speaker 1>that's you know, very important for Republicans, so there are

0:23:30.084 --> 0:23:33.004
<v Speaker 1>I think this is a this is an issue that

0:23:34.324 --> 0:23:37.804
<v Speaker 1>could be bipartisan in the sense that it's something that

0:23:37.924 --> 0:23:41.564
<v Speaker 1>Democrats care about, but it's actually something that can help Republicans.

0:23:41.604 --> 0:23:43.924
<v Speaker 1>And I think that if they're thinking about if the

0:23:44.044 --> 0:23:47.804
<v Speaker 1>GOP is thinking of midterm elections, right, if they're thinking about, okay,

0:23:47.924 --> 0:23:53.044
<v Speaker 1>which seats are up, then they might start realizing, hey,

0:23:53.284 --> 0:23:56.964
<v Speaker 1>like if this bill passes as is right. If these

0:23:57.044 --> 0:24:02.244
<v Speaker 1>cuts actually pass, if all of my constituents suddenly realize that, oops,

0:24:02.324 --> 0:24:05.764
<v Speaker 1>like where's my medical coverage? Like what just happened? Maybe

0:24:05.844 --> 0:24:08.684
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to get reelected, Like maybe I'm not

0:24:08.804 --> 0:24:11.564
<v Speaker 1>going to look at as good. And you wonder why

0:24:11.604 --> 0:24:14.164
<v Speaker 1>they didn't think about this before when they were passing

0:24:14.244 --> 0:24:17.364
<v Speaker 1>the big, beautiful bill, but you'd be I've been shocked

0:24:17.404 --> 0:24:19.524
<v Speaker 1>at how many people have been like, oh, well, I

0:24:19.564 --> 0:24:21.204
<v Speaker 1>didn't really read that part of it, you know, I

0:24:21.244 --> 0:24:23.684
<v Speaker 1>didn't really I didn't really realize that that was in here.

0:24:24.124 --> 0:24:26.084
<v Speaker 1>And I'm like, wait, I'm sorry, what, Like, isn't that

0:24:26.164 --> 0:24:28.804
<v Speaker 1>your entire job? Or you have aids to do it

0:24:28.884 --> 0:24:30.444
<v Speaker 1>and to summarize it for you so that you don't

0:24:30.484 --> 0:24:32.644
<v Speaker 1>have to read it, but like, come on, like what

0:24:33.084 --> 0:24:33.484
<v Speaker 1>kind of a.

0:24:35.324 --> 0:24:37.204
<v Speaker 2>If we talked about the change to the text treatment

0:24:37.244 --> 0:24:38.644
<v Speaker 2>of gambling laws, right, that also.

0:24:38.444 --> 0:24:40.884
<v Speaker 1>Was kind of in so we actually we actually haven't

0:24:41.244 --> 0:24:42.364
<v Speaker 1>talked about that on the show.

0:24:43.244 --> 0:24:46.164
<v Speaker 2>So I think that's that's something that we call Until

0:24:47.204 --> 0:24:53.164
<v Speaker 2>gambling conductions are fully restored, I will not be there's authoritarian.

0:24:52.484 --> 0:25:00.084
<v Speaker 1>Menace and we'll be back right after this.

0:25:14.924 --> 0:25:16.444
<v Speaker 2>You know what I would do if I were shimmer,

0:25:16.524 --> 0:25:21.364
<v Speaker 2>what would you do? I would demand concessions on tariffs,

0:25:22.564 --> 0:25:25.404
<v Speaker 2>little little funky interesting more So, there are a couple

0:25:25.444 --> 0:25:31.204
<v Speaker 2>of reasons, right. One is that, I mean, look, Republicans people,

0:25:31.444 --> 0:25:34.044
<v Speaker 2>congressmen are stupid, right, so like the fact that like

0:25:34.124 --> 0:25:35.844
<v Speaker 2>this would be they're fucking stupid, Like why aren't you

0:25:35.884 --> 0:25:37.644
<v Speaker 2>going to Congress if you had, like honestly, like why

0:25:37.644 --> 0:25:39.444
<v Speaker 2>are you in Congress if you had like real talent

0:25:39.484 --> 0:25:42.924
<v Speaker 2>to contribute? I know, I guess I know some Congress

0:25:42.964 --> 0:25:45.124
<v Speaker 2>when I take I take that back.

0:25:45.204 --> 0:25:52.204
<v Speaker 1>But like Nate, Nate, Nate, okay, and my co host

0:25:52.324 --> 0:25:55.364
<v Speaker 1>has gone on the record that has say that congressmen are.

0:25:55.644 --> 0:26:00.684
<v Speaker 2>If I ever testify, no, but like I mean, okay, yeah,

0:26:00.804 --> 0:26:03.044
<v Speaker 2>just take the deal. It's a good deal. It's the

0:26:03.124 --> 0:26:05.244
<v Speaker 2>Luca Docich trade. Like, let me just take the deal.

0:26:05.364 --> 0:26:08.164
<v Speaker 2>You're gonna get something that like it will actually soft

0:26:08.284 --> 0:26:11.284
<v Speaker 2>in Trump's image and help you be re elected. Right,

0:26:11.324 --> 0:26:13.684
<v Speaker 2>And Democrats can say, oh, we held up, we were

0:26:13.764 --> 0:26:17.684
<v Speaker 2>so tough. Right, It's like, okay, deal, it's done.

0:26:17.724 --> 0:26:19.644
<v Speaker 1>But now talk about tariffs. Why do we think that

0:26:19.924 --> 0:26:21.604
<v Speaker 1>they should also be pushing for tariffs?

0:26:21.724 --> 0:26:23.604
<v Speaker 2>So for one thing, like again, I do am a

0:26:23.644 --> 0:26:27.084
<v Speaker 2>buyer of the EZRA argument that like, you might want

0:26:27.084 --> 0:26:29.244
<v Speaker 2>to pick something that is more abnormal, and the terrorists

0:26:29.244 --> 0:26:30.764
<v Speaker 2>are abnormal, both in the sense that we haven't had

0:26:30.804 --> 0:26:32.964
<v Speaker 2>these tariffs almost one hundred years and the fact that, like,

0:26:33.964 --> 0:26:37.644
<v Speaker 2>you know, you're abrogating Congress's role to regulate taxes and

0:26:37.724 --> 0:26:39.604
<v Speaker 2>collection of spending in BacT. The case will be litigated

0:26:39.644 --> 0:26:41.764
<v Speaker 2>by the Supreme Court, so it might become a point eventually.

0:26:41.884 --> 0:26:45.044
<v Speaker 2>But like, but like you know, I think that is

0:26:45.084 --> 0:26:47.164
<v Speaker 2>more of a pain point between Trump and the GOP.

0:26:47.844 --> 0:26:52.924
<v Speaker 2>I think highlighting, you know, the economic news is worthwhile

0:26:52.924 --> 0:26:57.284
<v Speaker 2>for Democrats. We've had bad jobs reports lately. We also

0:26:57.364 --> 0:27:01.524
<v Speaker 2>had a revision that covered Biden's last year and Trump's

0:27:02.244 --> 0:27:05.044
<v Speaker 2>first half year, right where like, actually we've been overestimating

0:27:05.044 --> 0:27:07.484
<v Speaker 2>the number of jobs that were created. Maybe a little

0:27:07.524 --> 0:27:09.884
<v Speaker 2>bit easier to understand now. People were fed up economy

0:27:09.964 --> 0:27:14.244
<v Speaker 2>last year. But but like, I think terrorists are a

0:27:14.284 --> 0:27:16.724
<v Speaker 2>better pain point. I think I think they're a hard

0:27:16.804 --> 0:27:19.644
<v Speaker 2>deal for the GOP to take. They're the one issue

0:27:19.644 --> 0:27:22.604
<v Speaker 2>that's improven to hurt Trump's popularity, and they get a

0:27:22.684 --> 0:27:26.564
<v Speaker 2>little bit at the lack of at the extra legs,

0:27:26.604 --> 0:27:30.724
<v Speaker 2>shall we say, constitutionality, right, not respecting traditional norms where

0:27:30.764 --> 0:27:32.444
<v Speaker 2>it's like you could have the healthcare fight with Mitt

0:27:32.524 --> 0:27:36.644
<v Speaker 2>Romney or Nikki Haley as you're as your president, right.

0:27:36.924 --> 0:27:39.844
<v Speaker 1>So you're saying that they should pick something that is

0:27:41.404 --> 0:27:44.644
<v Speaker 1>that really seems to be out of the ordinary, that

0:27:44.804 --> 0:27:48.484
<v Speaker 1>is like something that we're it's I don't know if

0:27:48.524 --> 0:27:50.924
<v Speaker 1>out of them, but like that has surpassed all of

0:27:51.004 --> 0:27:52.724
<v Speaker 1>the norms and is really.

0:27:52.684 --> 0:27:55.764
<v Speaker 2>It's it's hard because like if you laundry live, I

0:27:55.764 --> 0:27:57.324
<v Speaker 2>mean the thing, you know, a lot of things that

0:27:57.324 --> 0:28:03.724
<v Speaker 2>are out of the ordinary, are totally non germane to budgeting,

0:28:04.404 --> 0:28:09.564
<v Speaker 2>are obscure, or are unpopular, right, I mean, like you.

0:28:09.604 --> 0:28:12.804
<v Speaker 1>Know, but Tariff's is something that can be a point

0:28:13.084 --> 0:28:16.484
<v Speaker 1>around which you can actually coalesce, and it is something

0:28:16.564 --> 0:28:20.124
<v Speaker 1>that is more i wouldn't say popular, but more in

0:28:20.204 --> 0:28:23.884
<v Speaker 1>the popular mind because there are these downstream effects that

0:28:23.964 --> 0:28:27.804
<v Speaker 1>are starting to be felt by the way. We haven't

0:28:27.844 --> 0:28:30.684
<v Speaker 1>really talked about, you know, the FED that much on

0:28:30.804 --> 0:28:33.084
<v Speaker 1>the show, but this is all tied up right with

0:28:33.684 --> 0:28:36.964
<v Speaker 1>the FED rate cuts, you know what's going to be

0:28:37.044 --> 0:28:40.044
<v Speaker 1>happening there, Like this is a much broader conversation.

0:28:40.284 --> 0:28:42.484
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And I mean, look if you had things like, Okay, well,

0:28:42.564 --> 0:28:47.244
<v Speaker 2>Trump shouldn't fire try to fire Lisa Cook, one of

0:28:47.284 --> 0:28:49.804
<v Speaker 2>the chairmen on the board of the Federal Reserve. Sure, women, right,

0:28:50.124 --> 0:28:52.724
<v Speaker 2>it seems like this mortgage stuff has been trumped up

0:28:53.004 --> 0:28:54.364
<v Speaker 2>in her case, or he shouldn't have fire to the

0:28:54.364 --> 0:28:57.084
<v Speaker 2>BLS commissiony like, those things might appeal to someone like me,

0:28:57.364 --> 0:29:00.524
<v Speaker 2>but they're pretty freaking esoteric to like the average person.

0:29:00.604 --> 0:29:03.564
<v Speaker 2>Whereas terraffs, you have a little bit of everything right.

0:29:03.644 --> 0:29:05.604
<v Speaker 2>You have a message about how the economy is not

0:29:05.684 --> 0:29:08.084
<v Speaker 2>doing very well, you have a message about like Trump

0:29:08.164 --> 0:29:13.364
<v Speaker 2>overstepping his bounds, and that still gives you a legible

0:29:13.484 --> 0:29:16.124
<v Speaker 2>cause to find this is one of the most unpopular

0:29:16.204 --> 0:29:16.884
<v Speaker 2>things that he's done.

0:29:17.884 --> 0:29:19.884
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that they would have a shot if

0:29:19.924 --> 0:29:22.884
<v Speaker 1>they actually pushed the tariff stuff? Because I think you're

0:29:22.924 --> 0:29:26.124
<v Speaker 1>absolutely right, like, this is genuinely unpopular, and before it

0:29:26.284 --> 0:29:29.604
<v Speaker 1>was passed, a lot of Republicans were like, whoa, whoa,

0:29:29.604 --> 0:29:31.524
<v Speaker 1>wo he's not actually going to do this, right, we

0:29:31.684 --> 0:29:34.324
<v Speaker 1>know that this is terrible. It's terrible economics, terrible policy,

0:29:34.444 --> 0:29:36.444
<v Speaker 1>terrible for the country, terrible for all of this. But

0:29:36.484 --> 0:29:40.444
<v Speaker 1>then everyone just completely fell in line. As with everything

0:29:40.564 --> 0:29:43.764
<v Speaker 1>basically that Trump has done and stood behind him. So

0:29:43.884 --> 0:29:45.844
<v Speaker 1>what do we do You actually think that this is

0:29:46.004 --> 0:29:48.164
<v Speaker 1>plausible that they could win on this.

0:29:48.644 --> 0:29:50.684
<v Speaker 2>Well, I'm not sure you want to win, you know

0:29:50.724 --> 0:29:52.564
<v Speaker 2>what I mean. I mean, look, at some point they

0:29:52.564 --> 0:29:55.444
<v Speaker 2>shutdown will end, right And by the way, the way

0:29:55.484 --> 0:29:57.484
<v Speaker 2>it might end Democrats be prepared for this, right is,

0:29:57.524 --> 0:30:02.044
<v Speaker 2>Republicans might say, Okay, we are going to get rid

0:30:02.884 --> 0:30:06.124
<v Speaker 2>of the filibuster for passing bugetary leixlation as they've already

0:30:06.124 --> 0:30:07.924
<v Speaker 2>gotten rid of it, or Democrats in some cases too,

0:30:08.124 --> 0:30:10.924
<v Speaker 2>for almost everything, right, I mean, just this past week,

0:30:11.004 --> 0:30:13.724
<v Speaker 2>Republicans plan to change the Senate rules to make it

0:30:13.804 --> 0:30:17.444
<v Speaker 2>easier to like nominate Trump appointees in batches, right, And

0:30:17.524 --> 0:30:19.964
<v Speaker 2>so if you're not gonna like have it for that stuff,

0:30:20.004 --> 0:30:21.724
<v Speaker 2>and I who fucking cares about the nothing the budget

0:30:21.724 --> 0:30:23.924
<v Speaker 2>stuff isn't important, but like it's such a thin ree

0:30:24.084 --> 0:30:27.364
<v Speaker 2>that like, okay, look, you have a trifecta, you run

0:30:27.404 --> 0:30:29.564
<v Speaker 2>the government, pass your fucking bill, right, you got to

0:30:29.644 --> 0:30:31.764
<v Speaker 2>change the rules. Don't respect rules in the first place, right,

0:30:31.924 --> 0:30:33.684
<v Speaker 2>who cares about the fucking filibuster? And by the way,

0:30:33.724 --> 0:30:35.484
<v Speaker 2>we're not gonna use a filibuster, We're happing to win

0:30:35.564 --> 0:30:37.524
<v Speaker 2>back a triffecta in Congress in twenty twenty eight. We're

0:30:37.524 --> 0:30:39.444
<v Speaker 2>not gonna use aucking filibuster, right, There's gonna be so

0:30:39.524 --> 0:30:41.084
<v Speaker 2>much damage that you did that we're gonna have to

0:30:41.324 --> 0:30:43.644
<v Speaker 2>have a day one agenda of getting all this stuff undone.

0:30:43.644 --> 0:30:46.364
<v Speaker 2>Now it sound like Evin Newsommer something like that, right,

0:30:46.444 --> 0:30:49.644
<v Speaker 2>But like, yeah, the endgame is that probably Republicans nuke

0:30:49.644 --> 0:30:55.324
<v Speaker 2>the filibuster and then pass their bill and Democrats have

0:30:55.444 --> 0:30:58.684
<v Speaker 2>this comprotational moment. Maybe it goes well, maybe it goes

0:30:58.764 --> 0:31:01.404
<v Speaker 2>not so well, right, but like it, you know, changes

0:31:01.444 --> 0:31:03.244
<v Speaker 2>the vibe at a time when the vibe is I

0:31:03.284 --> 0:31:05.204
<v Speaker 2>would argue, not going that great for Democrats.

0:31:06.244 --> 0:31:09.884
<v Speaker 1>So let me ask a very naive question, because I

0:31:09.924 --> 0:31:13.644
<v Speaker 1>think it's one that people kind of reflexively don't even

0:31:13.724 --> 0:31:16.884
<v Speaker 1>think to ask. Why, you know, why are we always

0:31:16.964 --> 0:31:20.084
<v Speaker 1>talking about, like trying to avoid a government shutdown? What

0:31:20.284 --> 0:31:24.004
<v Speaker 1>actually happens if this doesn't happen and the government shuts down?

0:31:24.084 --> 0:31:25.724
<v Speaker 1>How does that affect us?

0:31:26.004 --> 0:31:26.164
<v Speaker 2>Right?

0:31:26.604 --> 0:31:30.324
<v Speaker 1>Do we? How bad is it? How bad is it so?

0:31:30.564 --> 0:31:32.884
<v Speaker 2>Services that are deemed in essential can get shut down?

0:31:32.884 --> 0:31:35.404
<v Speaker 2>I mean examples people point to is national parks can

0:31:35.444 --> 0:31:39.764
<v Speaker 2>get shut down that you have less tsa staffing, for example,

0:31:39.844 --> 0:31:41.964
<v Speaker 2>government facilities of different types of clothes, certain types of

0:31:42.044 --> 0:31:45.004
<v Speaker 2>checks don't go out. I mean, now you also.

0:31:44.884 --> 0:31:47.324
<v Speaker 1>Basically the same shits that's already happening.

0:31:48.804 --> 0:31:52.124
<v Speaker 2>Why like the doge pinging it to doge, right, because

0:31:52.164 --> 0:31:54.764
<v Speaker 2>then they want to turn a bunch of stuff off

0:31:54.844 --> 0:31:56.484
<v Speaker 2>and see what happened. I guess kind of opt of

0:31:56.564 --> 0:31:58.044
<v Speaker 2>like throw a bunch of shit the well, it's like,

0:31:58.044 --> 0:31:59.964
<v Speaker 2>turn a bunch of switches off and see what breaks.

0:32:01.164 --> 0:32:02.924
<v Speaker 1>And so a lot of stuff started breaking.

0:32:03.124 --> 0:32:06.484
<v Speaker 2>Any shutdowns would have been disguised in that, you know here.

0:32:06.604 --> 0:32:08.524
<v Speaker 2>I mean, look, Trump will have a lot of power

0:32:08.684 --> 0:32:14.364
<v Speaker 2>to to determine to both interpret the rules liberally Yen

0:32:14.564 --> 0:32:17.244
<v Speaker 2>color outside the lines quite a bit, right, and I

0:32:17.324 --> 0:32:20.484
<v Speaker 2>think he will in ways that could be advantageous to him.

0:32:20.484 --> 0:32:21.724
<v Speaker 2>I mean, this is kind of one of the you know,

0:32:21.764 --> 0:32:24.364
<v Speaker 2>friend of the pod Matt Glassman wrote a post about

0:32:24.364 --> 0:32:25.764
<v Speaker 2>how actually this is probably a bad idea of the

0:32:25.764 --> 0:32:28.564
<v Speaker 2>shutdown because like, when you're not the party in power,

0:32:28.644 --> 0:32:30.124
<v Speaker 2>you don't have a lot of power, right, and like

0:32:30.204 --> 0:32:32.564
<v Speaker 2>the advantage of like you need to use the poker tern,

0:32:32.804 --> 0:32:35.884
<v Speaker 2>you're kind of always in position if you're right, you

0:32:36.004 --> 0:32:38.244
<v Speaker 2>get to see. And also this has been telegraphed, right,

0:32:38.724 --> 0:32:41.244
<v Speaker 2>you know, Republicans are aware. They can read the New

0:32:41.324 --> 0:32:43.204
<v Speaker 2>York Times too, they can read Ezra's piece, and they

0:32:43.244 --> 0:32:45.644
<v Speaker 2>can read what Chuck Schumer says to the Washington Post.

0:32:45.764 --> 0:32:49.964
<v Speaker 2>And I'm sure they've prepped messaging and a strategy and

0:32:50.364 --> 0:32:52.004
<v Speaker 2>and that makes it harder.

0:32:52.164 --> 0:32:55.244
<v Speaker 1>But like, but yeah, yeah, no, I think I think

0:32:55.284 --> 0:32:58.004
<v Speaker 1>these are all all important things to consider. I think

0:32:58.084 --> 0:33:00.484
<v Speaker 1>this is an interesting take. Let's see, let's see what

0:33:00.564 --> 0:33:03.364
<v Speaker 1>ends up happening, and if we end up using tariffs

0:33:03.444 --> 0:33:06.724
<v Speaker 1>as well. I do think that even though it's good

0:33:06.764 --> 0:33:10.324
<v Speaker 1>for Republicans, I'm glad that the Democrats are pushing for

0:33:10.444 --> 0:33:14.164
<v Speaker 1>healthcare as well, because that's also pretty damn important. But

0:33:14.284 --> 0:33:16.404
<v Speaker 1>let's get tariffs in there. I think that's a great

0:33:16.444 --> 0:33:22.924
<v Speaker 1>idea and hopefully we can avoid the more serious consequences

0:33:23.124 --> 0:33:26.764
<v Speaker 1>of a shutdown. On that note, Nate, are you are

0:33:26.804 --> 0:33:30.044
<v Speaker 1>you going to be playing any poker doing anything interesting

0:33:30.164 --> 0:33:32.364
<v Speaker 1>in those lines this week? Or are we are we

0:33:32.524 --> 0:33:34.124
<v Speaker 1>just all politics now? For now?

0:33:35.244 --> 0:33:39.204
<v Speaker 2>I think I'm coming to the napt in Vegas and November. No,

0:33:39.404 --> 0:33:41.764
<v Speaker 2>this is going to be like a I do finely.

0:33:41.764 --> 0:33:43.804
<v Speaker 2>The AMPT like a four month break in between poker

0:33:43.844 --> 0:33:46.164
<v Speaker 2>tournaments I play. I play Cash Influence twice a month.

0:33:46.204 --> 0:33:48.444
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, I'll be I'll be fresh for that, Maria,

0:33:48.484 --> 0:33:49.084
<v Speaker 2>I'll put it like that.

0:33:49.724 --> 0:33:52.924
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I will also be fresh for the napt in November,

0:33:53.644 --> 0:33:55.844
<v Speaker 1>the Poker Stares event that I'll be playing, and we

0:33:56.204 --> 0:33:58.524
<v Speaker 1>stay tuned, guys, we might end up doing a risky

0:33:58.604 --> 0:34:03.684
<v Speaker 1>business meetup at that point, so we'll we'll let you

0:34:03.724 --> 0:34:04.884
<v Speaker 1>know if we have plans of that.

0:34:05.204 --> 0:34:07.924
<v Speaker 2>And a reminder, there will be a new episode in

0:34:08.004 --> 0:34:10.684
<v Speaker 2>the feed on Saturday. Having two episodes a week now,

0:34:10.764 --> 0:34:13.484
<v Speaker 2>and like Saturdays, I feel like Saturday is a good

0:34:13.564 --> 0:34:15.564
<v Speaker 2>day to listen to podcasts. No one has fucking episodes

0:34:15.564 --> 0:34:18.044
<v Speaker 2>on Saturdays. Right, you're jogging, you're doing a little drive

0:34:18.444 --> 0:34:20.644
<v Speaker 2>out in Hudson Valley or what else. You're gardening, Right,

0:34:20.684 --> 0:34:22.084
<v Speaker 2>you got a lot of time on your hands. No

0:34:22.204 --> 0:34:24.404
<v Speaker 2>fucking new episodes on Saturday. But we're gonna have this

0:34:24.564 --> 0:34:27.244
<v Speaker 2>episode on Saturday. It's an interview with Ellie Honig about

0:34:27.244 --> 0:34:29.084
<v Speaker 2>his new book, When You Come at the King, which

0:34:29.164 --> 0:34:30.884
<v Speaker 2>is all about special counsels and what it takes to

0:34:30.964 --> 0:34:32.284
<v Speaker 2>prosecute the president.

0:34:32.684 --> 0:34:34.804
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and from here on out, you can expect that

0:34:34.884 --> 0:34:38.404
<v Speaker 1>double drop schedule from us every single week. So now

0:34:38.524 --> 0:34:41.164
<v Speaker 1>you know what you're going to be doing Saturday morning.

0:34:41.844 --> 0:34:44.484
<v Speaker 1>Congratulations everyone, I'm so glad. Congratulations be a part of

0:34:44.564 --> 0:34:54.564
<v Speaker 1>your routine. Let us know what you think of the show.

0:34:54.804 --> 0:34:58.284
<v Speaker 1>Reach out to us at Risky Business at pushkin dot Fm.

0:34:59.564 --> 0:35:02.444
<v Speaker 1>Risky Business is hosted by me Maria Kanakova and.

0:35:02.604 --> 0:35:05.484
<v Speaker 2>By me Nate Silver. The show was a cool production

0:35:05.604 --> 0:35:09.164
<v Speaker 2>of Pushing Industries and iHeartMedia. This episode was produced by

0:35:09.204 --> 0:35:13.444
<v Speaker 2>I at Carter. Our associate producer is Sonia Gerwit Lydia,

0:35:13.564 --> 0:35:16.444
<v Speaker 2>Jean Kott and Daphne Chen are our editors, and our

0:35:16.484 --> 0:35:20.284
<v Speaker 2>executive producer is Jacob Goldstein. Mixing by Sarah Bruguer.

0:35:21.804 --> 0:35:24.004
<v Speaker 1>If you like the show, please rate and review us

0:35:24.044 --> 0:35:26.684
<v Speaker 1>so other people can find us too, But once again,

0:35:26.844 --> 0:35:28.644
<v Speaker 1>only if you like us. We don't want those bad

0:35:28.684 --> 0:35:30.804
<v Speaker 1>reviews out there. Thanks for tuning in.