WEBVTT - U.S. Oil Demand Is Peaking, Expect Lower Prices At Pump: Schork

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg P and L Podcast. I'm pim Fox.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Abramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether you're at the grocery store

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg P and L

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot com. Crude

0:00:32.920 --> 0:00:36.680
<v Speaker 1>oil contracts are higher by nearly two on the NIMEX

0:00:36.800 --> 0:00:39.080
<v Speaker 1>right now Here to tell us more about the oil

0:00:39.159 --> 0:00:42.920
<v Speaker 1>complex is Stephen Shorky is the president of the Short Group.

0:00:43.120 --> 0:00:47.519
<v Speaker 1>Joining us from Villanova, Pennsylvania. Stephen shork always a pleasure.

0:00:47.760 --> 0:00:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Let's begin with news today about Saudi Arabia curbing output

0:00:52.720 --> 0:00:57.040
<v Speaker 1>last month. This is according to OPEC delegates, and also

0:00:57.520 --> 0:01:01.680
<v Speaker 1>the trade dispute that now has become political between Saudi

0:01:01.720 --> 0:01:06.679
<v Speaker 1>Arabia and Canada. What does this mean for oil prices? Well,

0:01:06.720 --> 0:01:08.920
<v Speaker 1>if we're left just to the seasonality of it all

0:01:09.120 --> 0:01:12.440
<v Speaker 1>him right now, oil demand in the United States, if

0:01:12.480 --> 0:01:15.640
<v Speaker 1>it has not peaked for the year, it shall peak

0:01:15.720 --> 0:01:18.120
<v Speaker 1>over the next couple of months, excuse me, a couple

0:01:18.120 --> 0:01:20.640
<v Speaker 1>of weeks. That is to say so, we typically see

0:01:20.640 --> 0:01:23.360
<v Speaker 1>the highest demand for crudal. At the peak of the summer,

0:01:23.400 --> 0:01:26.680
<v Speaker 1>we demand for gasolene is at its strongest. So as

0:01:26.680 --> 0:01:29.279
<v Speaker 1>we transition into August, Now, of course we look ahead

0:01:29.319 --> 0:01:31.840
<v Speaker 1>into September, we're not going to the shore, we're not

0:01:31.880 --> 0:01:35.200
<v Speaker 1>going to the Poconos anymore. The kids are back at school,

0:01:35.360 --> 0:01:38.360
<v Speaker 1>so demand for gasolene falls, and then demand for crudal

0:01:38.440 --> 0:01:43.160
<v Speaker 1>falls precipitously as we go into the fall maintenance season. Now, remember,

0:01:43.240 --> 0:01:45.280
<v Speaker 1>the refinery is the only guy in the world that

0:01:45.400 --> 0:01:49.280
<v Speaker 1>actually buys crudal to use it, and their consumption of

0:01:49.320 --> 0:01:52.640
<v Speaker 1>crudal drops tremendously in the months of September and October.

0:01:53.120 --> 0:01:58.160
<v Speaker 1>And based on the published UH schedules for maintenance coming

0:01:58.200 --> 0:02:02.280
<v Speaker 1>this fall, this maintenance season will be extraordinarily high. So

0:02:02.360 --> 0:02:04.520
<v Speaker 1>we can expect to see a sharp drop off in

0:02:04.640 --> 0:02:07.960
<v Speaker 1>demand for crude all in the months ahead. So what

0:02:08.080 --> 0:02:11.359
<v Speaker 1>does this mean for price? Well, intuitively, if you're at

0:02:11.360 --> 0:02:15.239
<v Speaker 1>the peak of the season and we're already well off prices,

0:02:15.320 --> 0:02:17.720
<v Speaker 1>that is, are already well off their highs and we're

0:02:17.720 --> 0:02:20.880
<v Speaker 1>only looking at weakening demand in the months ahead, that

0:02:20.919 --> 0:02:25.560
<v Speaker 1>would imply lower prices in the nearby future. Okay, So

0:02:25.639 --> 0:02:28.960
<v Speaker 1>does this mean that the best trade is to play

0:02:29.000 --> 0:02:33.600
<v Speaker 1>on investors fears of increased prices. That's going the other way,

0:02:33.639 --> 0:02:36.800
<v Speaker 1>that's the contrary bet. Make sure that you could stick

0:02:36.840 --> 0:02:39.920
<v Speaker 1>it to an investor to pay sixty nine to seventy

0:02:39.919 --> 0:02:42.480
<v Speaker 1>dollars a barrel when the price, based on what you

0:02:42.600 --> 0:02:46.640
<v Speaker 1>just described, looks like it's going to fall right exactly,

0:02:46.720 --> 0:02:49.040
<v Speaker 1>So we did. We came out of the worst worst

0:02:49.080 --> 0:02:53.200
<v Speaker 1>of it, and and I think on investor's mind, what

0:02:53.320 --> 0:02:56.000
<v Speaker 1>was really not focused on was the loss of Canadian

0:02:56.080 --> 0:02:58.840
<v Speaker 1>crude oil. Uh, the market seem to be really focused,

0:02:58.840 --> 0:03:02.000
<v Speaker 1>of course on the situation in Iran, the situation in Venezuela,

0:03:02.080 --> 0:03:05.920
<v Speaker 1>the situation in Libya. But we had a major upgrader,

0:03:06.360 --> 0:03:09.320
<v Speaker 1>a production plant in Calgary that went down for an

0:03:09.400 --> 0:03:12.280
<v Speaker 1>unplanned outage back in the late spring, right as we

0:03:12.280 --> 0:03:15.080
<v Speaker 1>were going into the peak demand season for oil. And

0:03:15.160 --> 0:03:17.800
<v Speaker 1>keep in mind, demand for oil, demand for guests lane

0:03:17.880 --> 0:03:20.639
<v Speaker 1>in the United States has never been stronger. And yet

0:03:20.680 --> 0:03:23.679
<v Speaker 1>we lost a key supplier of that oil at the

0:03:23.760 --> 0:03:26.080
<v Speaker 1>start of the season, and hence we did have a

0:03:26.160 --> 0:03:29.600
<v Speaker 1>sharp run upping price. But the market has endured that

0:03:29.800 --> 0:03:33.240
<v Speaker 1>right now, so prices at this level from a fundamental

0:03:33.280 --> 0:03:38.040
<v Speaker 1>from the seasonality standpoint, you would expect to see lower prices,

0:03:37.080 --> 0:03:41.720
<v Speaker 1>a softening in prices as it wore. But clearly with

0:03:41.840 --> 0:03:47.120
<v Speaker 1>the headlines the reported assassination attempt down in Venezuela. Of course,

0:03:47.120 --> 0:03:50.760
<v Speaker 1>the situation between this White House and Tehran, the situation

0:03:51.080 --> 0:03:55.440
<v Speaker 1>in um in Libya, all plays into fear. And when

0:03:55.440 --> 0:03:57.920
<v Speaker 1>you have in fear in the market, that fear gets

0:03:57.960 --> 0:04:00.680
<v Speaker 1>priced in as a premium into the market. So there

0:04:00.720 --> 0:04:04.240
<v Speaker 1>there is that still continue to overhang in this market. Okay,

0:04:04.280 --> 0:04:08.000
<v Speaker 1>So if you're a driver and you're looking to put

0:04:08.040 --> 0:04:11.280
<v Speaker 1>the gasoline or fuel in your automobile, should you expect

0:04:11.280 --> 0:04:14.680
<v Speaker 1>prices to remain stable or at least lower going into

0:04:14.680 --> 0:04:17.880
<v Speaker 1>the fall? Well going fall, we have to keep in mind,

0:04:17.960 --> 0:04:20.040
<v Speaker 1>the investor listeners here has to keep in mind that

0:04:20.120 --> 0:04:23.720
<v Speaker 1>come September fifteen, the rules begin to change with the

0:04:23.720 --> 0:04:26.359
<v Speaker 1>type of gasolene that we put into our cars. And

0:04:26.360 --> 0:04:29.040
<v Speaker 1>then that that transitions again in the month of October

0:04:29.080 --> 0:04:32.599
<v Speaker 1>and once again in November, as you transition from a

0:04:33.040 --> 0:04:36.599
<v Speaker 1>summer grade gasolene to quote unquote a winter grade gasolene

0:04:36.880 --> 0:04:40.040
<v Speaker 1>now winter grade gasolene. Given the amount of chemical feedstocks

0:04:40.080 --> 0:04:43.880
<v Speaker 1>to go into manufacturer, they're plentiful, so the manufacturer where

0:04:43.920 --> 0:04:48.200
<v Speaker 1>the grade gasolene is a cheaper proposition. So inherently we

0:04:48.279 --> 0:04:50.400
<v Speaker 1>are going to see lower oil prices. We're going to

0:04:50.640 --> 0:04:53.760
<v Speaker 1>gasolene prices because of the transition for the types of

0:04:53.800 --> 0:04:58.080
<v Speaker 1>gasolene that are going into the refinery, uh coming out

0:04:58.120 --> 0:05:00.559
<v Speaker 1>of the refiner, I should say. So that's at him.

0:05:00.600 --> 0:05:03.200
<v Speaker 1>I would expect to see lower prices because let's keep

0:05:03.240 --> 0:05:05.839
<v Speaker 1>in mind, as you said, at the beginning of the summer,

0:05:05.880 --> 0:05:09.520
<v Speaker 1>when demand was at all time high, we lost access

0:05:09.600 --> 0:05:12.320
<v Speaker 1>to a lot of crude oil. We we've withstood that,

0:05:12.480 --> 0:05:14.680
<v Speaker 1>and now we're going to a weak demand part of

0:05:14.720 --> 0:05:18.440
<v Speaker 1>the year when we're manufacturing a cheaper gasoline going into

0:05:18.480 --> 0:05:23.440
<v Speaker 1>that uh uh time frame. So I think at worst

0:05:24.040 --> 0:05:29.159
<v Speaker 1>expect prices, you know, a slow, steady decline. But but

0:05:29.240 --> 0:05:31.400
<v Speaker 1>certainly I would expect to see you're going to see

0:05:31.440 --> 0:05:35.240
<v Speaker 1>a decline. That's just economically a truth that we'll see

0:05:35.240 --> 0:05:37.240
<v Speaker 1>it over the next couple of months. All Right, I

0:05:37.279 --> 0:05:40.960
<v Speaker 1>want you to put oil to the side. For gasoline

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:43.159
<v Speaker 1>to the side, I want you to talk about liquefied

0:05:43.240 --> 0:05:47.400
<v Speaker 1>natural gas and the potential Chinese tariffs on l en

0:05:47.520 --> 0:05:52.239
<v Speaker 1>g imports. Yeah, that that was a big surprise. Of course,

0:05:52.560 --> 0:05:58.120
<v Speaker 1>China has identified US energy imports as tariffs, but they

0:05:58.160 --> 0:06:01.320
<v Speaker 1>they had left out ellen G and I say that

0:06:01.360 --> 0:06:03.320
<v Speaker 1>as a surprise, and I think it is catching the

0:06:03.320 --> 0:06:06.560
<v Speaker 1>market a little bit off guard, given that China is

0:06:06.600 --> 0:06:09.760
<v Speaker 1>in a massive transition to wean itself off of coal

0:06:10.480 --> 0:06:13.720
<v Speaker 1>onto gas, and it's been a major buyer of l

0:06:13.800 --> 0:06:17.800
<v Speaker 1>en G cargoes over the past year. Some estimates now

0:06:17.839 --> 0:06:22.400
<v Speaker 1>have China as the world's largest buyer of l n G. Uh.

0:06:22.600 --> 0:06:26.919
<v Speaker 1>So this was a surprise. I am skeptical China's making

0:06:26.920 --> 0:06:30.440
<v Speaker 1>this threat. I am skeptical because we are we are

0:06:30.480 --> 0:06:32.320
<v Speaker 1>coming out of the summer, which means we're going into

0:06:32.360 --> 0:06:34.880
<v Speaker 1>the fall, and we're going into the peak demand season

0:06:34.920 --> 0:06:38.919
<v Speaker 1>for Chinese gas consumption the winter. And the flexibility that

0:06:39.080 --> 0:06:44.440
<v Speaker 1>us LG has it uh the cargoes can easily go

0:06:44.520 --> 0:06:47.240
<v Speaker 1>into China. And this is what we saw last year.

0:06:47.560 --> 0:06:50.160
<v Speaker 1>And when you have excess demand in the Chinese market,

0:06:50.160 --> 0:06:52.520
<v Speaker 1>it was the us LG that fit that gap because

0:06:52.520 --> 0:06:55.560
<v Speaker 1>of its flexibility. We gotta leave it there. Stephen Short

0:06:55.720 --> 0:06:59.240
<v Speaker 1>is the president of the Short Group. He's based in Villanova,

0:06:59.400 --> 0:07:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Pennsylvan and he's talking crude and liquefied natural gas. Right now,

0:07:18.720 --> 0:07:22.720
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about CBS and the decline in the value

0:07:22.840 --> 0:07:28.080
<v Speaker 1>of CBS shares since the accusations of sexual harassment against

0:07:28.120 --> 0:07:32.120
<v Speaker 1>the CBS chief executive less Moonvest. Here to help us

0:07:32.200 --> 0:07:34.520
<v Speaker 1>understand what's going on, is Tuna a MOBI. He is

0:07:34.560 --> 0:07:38.560
<v Speaker 1>the senior media and entertainment analysts for cf R Research.

0:07:38.680 --> 0:07:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Tuna always a pleasure. I was looking at the price

0:07:42.920 --> 0:07:47.239
<v Speaker 1>of CBS stock and all right, fifty two bucks to share.

0:07:48.000 --> 0:07:55.160
<v Speaker 1>But the decline since the revelation of these accusations against

0:07:55.240 --> 0:07:58.440
<v Speaker 1>less Moonvest. Do you believe that that is really what

0:07:58.640 --> 0:08:02.720
<v Speaker 1>is hurting the style? PIM? First off, good morning, Thanks

0:08:02.760 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 1>for having me. Um. Absolutely, I think um. I think

0:08:06.360 --> 0:08:09.680
<v Speaker 1>it does create an overhang on the stock, which is

0:08:09.760 --> 0:08:12.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of why we downgraded it shares um from it

0:08:12.680 --> 0:08:16.000
<v Speaker 1>by to a hold. Um. It's a little bit disappointing

0:08:16.080 --> 0:08:19.720
<v Speaker 1>PIM that the company chose to conduct business as usual

0:08:19.800 --> 0:08:23.440
<v Speaker 1>and the last earnings call as if wishing that the

0:08:23.560 --> 0:08:27.040
<v Speaker 1>matter of the ongoing investigation will will just go away.

0:08:27.760 --> 0:08:30.320
<v Speaker 1>But there is no questionably a cloud of overhang as

0:08:30.320 --> 0:08:34.840
<v Speaker 1>a results of this on for investigation, and we think

0:08:34.880 --> 0:08:38.040
<v Speaker 1>that as long as that cloud does not get resolved

0:08:38.080 --> 0:08:43.000
<v Speaker 1>in a substantive manner that investors should tread cautiously even

0:08:43.040 --> 0:08:46.920
<v Speaker 1>as the company has demonstrated continued strong fundamentals here. So

0:08:47.000 --> 0:08:52.120
<v Speaker 1>we are cautiously, um, you know, waiting for the uh

0:08:52.280 --> 0:08:54.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of the substance, and and based on that, we

0:08:55.080 --> 0:08:57.960
<v Speaker 1>just think it's uh, it's prudent to to not add

0:08:58.040 --> 0:09:00.360
<v Speaker 1>to current positions. Okay, but let me ask you a

0:09:00.400 --> 0:09:04.400
<v Speaker 1>little bit. If indeed the company is doing well. We

0:09:04.559 --> 0:09:08.600
<v Speaker 1>got the results last week. They're over the top business,

0:09:08.600 --> 0:09:15.640
<v Speaker 1>exceeding estimates. They're adding subscribers at an accelerated rate. Their

0:09:15.840 --> 0:09:20.560
<v Speaker 1>retransmission fees are also higher. Why wouldn't this be a

0:09:20.640 --> 0:09:24.079
<v Speaker 1>good opportunity to buy a stock that's trading at fifty

0:09:24.160 --> 0:09:27.319
<v Speaker 1>two that maybe just about let's say the middle of July,

0:09:27.960 --> 0:09:31.760
<v Speaker 1>was trading nearly sixty dollars To share the simple answer,

0:09:31.880 --> 0:09:35.480
<v Speaker 1>pay me that Less move is an integral part of

0:09:35.520 --> 0:09:38.600
<v Speaker 1>the investments here. And there's a lot of investors that

0:09:38.640 --> 0:09:43.360
<v Speaker 1>we speak to that actually brought into CBS precisely because

0:09:43.440 --> 0:09:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Less and his team have demonstrated division to execute on

0:09:47.559 --> 0:09:51.840
<v Speaker 1>that course strategy that you just alluded to. Growth in um,

0:09:51.880 --> 0:09:56.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, non traditional revenue streams, whether it's UH streaming

0:09:56.280 --> 0:10:00.680
<v Speaker 1>or content licensing UM over the time up you know,

0:10:00.880 --> 0:10:05.280
<v Speaker 1>things of that nature retransmission. So I think the fundamentals

0:10:05.320 --> 0:10:09.160
<v Speaker 1>definitely UM are very healthy, as you have alluded to.

0:10:09.320 --> 0:10:12.679
<v Speaker 1>But right now I think, uh, there's a real uh

0:10:12.800 --> 0:10:16.280
<v Speaker 1>some likelihood that some of the sharehold the value uh

0:10:16.360 --> 0:10:19.640
<v Speaker 1>that Less Movements has created over the last decades, some

0:10:19.720 --> 0:10:22.760
<v Speaker 1>of that could be uh eroded in the event that

0:10:22.840 --> 0:10:26.880
<v Speaker 1>he could, you know, potentially be found uh uh you

0:10:26.920 --> 0:10:30.280
<v Speaker 1>know somewhat complexity or even if should he leave. And

0:10:30.320 --> 0:10:34.520
<v Speaker 1>remember there's still the issue of the potential merger with Votcom,

0:10:34.559 --> 0:10:38.959
<v Speaker 1>which National Amusements is pushing uh and the litigation that

0:10:39.200 --> 0:10:41.960
<v Speaker 1>is pending in that regard also creates an overhanging. There's

0:10:42.000 --> 0:10:44.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of CBS investors who would not like to

0:10:44.480 --> 0:10:47.520
<v Speaker 1>see that merger happened. And to the extent that you

0:10:47.559 --> 0:10:51.320
<v Speaker 1>know less who is the chief opponent of that marger

0:10:51.480 --> 0:10:54.640
<v Speaker 1>to the extent that he's displaced, I think bringing together

0:10:54.720 --> 0:10:57.680
<v Speaker 1>the two companies could also read some questions in the

0:10:57.720 --> 0:11:00.520
<v Speaker 1>minds of CBS investors as to whether at is in

0:11:00.559 --> 0:11:03.880
<v Speaker 1>fact something that will uh grow share all the value

0:11:03.920 --> 0:11:06.440
<v Speaker 1>over the long term. Well to know I'm glad you

0:11:06.520 --> 0:11:09.719
<v Speaker 1>mentioned Viacom. They're going to be reporting their results on

0:11:09.800 --> 0:11:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Thursday before the market opens. What do you expect so

0:11:14.960 --> 0:11:18.000
<v Speaker 1>CEO Robert Bakish. I think he's on on the on

0:11:18.040 --> 0:11:21.080
<v Speaker 1>the good path, right. So he's articulated his vision to

0:11:21.240 --> 0:11:25.240
<v Speaker 1>focus on the flagship brands, and we are actually encouraged

0:11:25.280 --> 0:11:27.679
<v Speaker 1>by by some of the strides that have been made

0:11:27.800 --> 0:11:31.760
<v Speaker 1>under his tenure. Um, you know, we're seeing some stabilization

0:11:31.800 --> 0:11:34.520
<v Speaker 1>in the ratings that a Nickelodeon and and and MTV

0:11:34.640 --> 0:11:37.520
<v Speaker 1>and v h one. Uh, there's still some challenges there,

0:11:37.559 --> 0:11:40.559
<v Speaker 1>to be sure. At the Paramount Studio, I think we

0:11:40.720 --> 0:11:44.760
<v Speaker 1>actually have been encouraged by a stemming of of the

0:11:44.760 --> 0:11:47.240
<v Speaker 1>the the challenges that they've faced over the last several

0:11:47.360 --> 0:11:51.280
<v Speaker 1>years where they've on the performed uh the other Hollywood studios.

0:11:51.320 --> 0:11:54.080
<v Speaker 1>So I think there's also progress there in terms of

0:11:54.120 --> 0:11:58.600
<v Speaker 1>the turnaround strategy. But we do expect to your question

0:11:58.679 --> 0:12:03.760
<v Speaker 1>that there's still some underlying issues with maintaining some operating

0:12:03.800 --> 0:12:08.040
<v Speaker 1>consistency on the advertising side. Uh. The company is still

0:12:08.200 --> 0:12:12.480
<v Speaker 1>somewhat I think disadvantaged in this highly consolidated landscape where

0:12:12.520 --> 0:12:15.880
<v Speaker 1>I think you see more uh, the bigger scale becomes

0:12:15.880 --> 0:12:19.120
<v Speaker 1>even more important, which is why I think the merger

0:12:19.200 --> 0:12:23.320
<v Speaker 1>with CBS is arguably much more crucial for Vatcom compared

0:12:23.360 --> 0:12:26.959
<v Speaker 1>to CBS. Let's talk about another merger. Tell us about

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Disney and Century Fox. We get Disney results tomorrow after

0:12:31.840 --> 0:12:35.360
<v Speaker 1>the close. The shares right now hitting a new fifty

0:12:35.400 --> 0:12:37.280
<v Speaker 1>two week hi. The stock is up seven and a

0:12:37.360 --> 0:12:41.880
<v Speaker 1>half percent this year. Correct. We are still very bullish

0:12:41.920 --> 0:12:45.560
<v Speaker 1>on the shares of Disney. Withink the the the deal

0:12:45.679 --> 0:12:49.760
<v Speaker 1>with Fox which just got approved by shareholders recently. I

0:12:49.800 --> 0:12:53.679
<v Speaker 1>think that sets the company up very nicely to execute

0:12:53.679 --> 0:12:57.000
<v Speaker 1>on its direct to consumer strategy as well as the

0:12:57.000 --> 0:13:00.040
<v Speaker 1>advantages of scale. But I think, um, you know, the

0:13:00.360 --> 0:13:03.160
<v Speaker 1>elephant in the room here is going to be how

0:13:03.920 --> 0:13:07.760
<v Speaker 1>potentially h you know, Fox reacts to the bid for

0:13:08.040 --> 0:13:11.040
<v Speaker 1>for Sky, which, as you know, Comcast have loved a

0:13:11.120 --> 0:13:13.920
<v Speaker 1>much higher bid, and I think Fox has on until

0:13:14.040 --> 0:13:17.439
<v Speaker 1>Thursday too to beat that offer. I I do believe

0:13:17.440 --> 0:13:19.600
<v Speaker 1>that there's a very good chance that Fox can come

0:13:19.600 --> 0:13:23.440
<v Speaker 1>back with a higher offer for uh First Sky, which

0:13:23.480 --> 0:13:26.080
<v Speaker 1>could escalate the bid in war. And remember now that

0:13:26.200 --> 0:13:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Disney has an agreement in place, there's also the likelihood

0:13:30.120 --> 0:13:33.040
<v Speaker 1>we think that Disney could actually leap frog and make

0:13:33.120 --> 0:13:35.200
<v Speaker 1>a food beat for Sky. So there's all kinds of

0:13:35.240 --> 0:13:39.719
<v Speaker 1>moving parts here that will determine how, you know, the

0:13:40.000 --> 0:13:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Sky UH issue gets resolved, and I think that's probably

0:13:43.840 --> 0:13:48.760
<v Speaker 1>going to UH overshadow the results of these companies that

0:13:48.760 --> 0:13:51.200
<v Speaker 1>have coming up in the next couple of days or so. Well,

0:13:52.160 --> 0:13:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Century Fox reports on Wednesday just after the market closes.

0:13:58.280 --> 0:14:02.440
<v Speaker 1>What do you think comcasts UH strategic response will be

0:14:02.520 --> 0:14:05.040
<v Speaker 1>if they are not successful, as it looks as though

0:14:05.080 --> 0:14:09.040
<v Speaker 1>they will not be Fox, I wouldn't rule them out

0:14:09.200 --> 0:14:10.920
<v Speaker 1>as a matter of fact, Team. I would not even

0:14:10.960 --> 0:14:13.120
<v Speaker 1>say that they would not be successful, because I think

0:14:13.160 --> 0:14:15.679
<v Speaker 1>they made it pretty clear when they backed out of

0:14:15.720 --> 0:14:19.160
<v Speaker 1>the you know, of the chase for Fox that UM

0:14:19.400 --> 0:14:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Sky is now They're still focused, and I do believe

0:14:21.760 --> 0:14:24.720
<v Speaker 1>that's a real chance that they could come back yet

0:14:25.120 --> 0:14:27.960
<v Speaker 1>with a high offers. Should Disney and or Fox decide

0:14:28.040 --> 0:14:31.040
<v Speaker 1>to UH to top camp Comcast offer on the table,

0:14:31.080 --> 0:14:34.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Sky is an extremely strategic asset. We still

0:14:34.960 --> 0:14:37.720
<v Speaker 1>think that Sky is probably on balanced the better match

0:14:37.840 --> 0:14:42.520
<v Speaker 1>for Comcast rather than Disney, but I think expect both

0:14:42.560 --> 0:14:45.760
<v Speaker 1>companies to go all out because I think the Sky

0:14:45.920 --> 0:14:50.160
<v Speaker 1>assets are very unique skies as much as as as

0:14:50.200 --> 0:14:52.680
<v Speaker 1>a bona fide content provider as it is is a

0:14:52.760 --> 0:14:58.800
<v Speaker 1>satellite TV distributor, and the the most recent pact that

0:14:58.880 --> 0:15:02.760
<v Speaker 1>they just signed with the Premierly was very very compelling,

0:15:03.280 --> 0:15:07.920
<v Speaker 1>which makes it all the more valuable asset. Thanks very much.

0:15:07.960 --> 0:15:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Tuna Amobi, Senior Media Entertainment Analysts at c f r

0:15:12.640 --> 0:15:34.080
<v Speaker 1>A Research. What do the company's compona Arbor, how Arbor,

0:15:34.200 --> 0:15:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Holmes and Westwood Meets and Bound having common? They're all

0:15:38.440 --> 0:15:42.560
<v Speaker 1>companies that Warren Buffetts Berkshire Hathaway has acquired this year,

0:15:42.840 --> 0:15:46.040
<v Speaker 1>and while the names may not be familiar, that's probably

0:15:46.080 --> 0:15:50.080
<v Speaker 1>because they were not multibillion dollar deals. So here to

0:15:50.120 --> 0:15:52.880
<v Speaker 1>tell us what Warren Buffett and Berkshire Hathaway are going

0:15:52.920 --> 0:15:55.080
<v Speaker 1>to do with a hundred and eleven billion dollars worth

0:15:55.080 --> 0:15:59.480
<v Speaker 1>of cash Our own Tara La Chappelle, Boomberg opinion columnist,

0:15:59.520 --> 0:16:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Tara always a pleasure. Thanks for coming in, uh and

0:16:02.560 --> 0:16:05.120
<v Speaker 1>I just want to note to follow Tara on Twitter

0:16:05.280 --> 0:16:08.800
<v Speaker 1>just to go to at Tara lash L a c

0:16:09.280 --> 0:16:13.400
<v Speaker 1>h Alright, Tara lash what what kind of acquisition does

0:16:13.440 --> 0:16:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Warm Buffett need to make in order to really move

0:16:15.480 --> 0:16:18.200
<v Speaker 1>the needle at Berkshire Hathaway. Well, their cash is over

0:16:18.240 --> 0:16:20.360
<v Speaker 1>a hundred billion dollars, which has been the case for

0:16:20.400 --> 0:16:23.000
<v Speaker 1>a while now. I mean, obviously they need a big deal.

0:16:23.320 --> 0:16:25.360
<v Speaker 1>I think the challenge has been, you know, the same

0:16:25.400 --> 0:16:27.240
<v Speaker 1>over the past year, which is that everything is very

0:16:27.240 --> 0:16:30.200
<v Speaker 1>expensive compared to what a warm Buffett would like to

0:16:30.240 --> 0:16:32.440
<v Speaker 1>pay for deals. And I don't know if he just

0:16:32.440 --> 0:16:35.400
<v Speaker 1>bites the bullet and does something outside of evaluation he's

0:16:35.440 --> 0:16:38.040
<v Speaker 1>comfortable with, I don't know if that makes sense, or

0:16:38.240 --> 0:16:41.400
<v Speaker 1>does he finally give in and think about doing buy backs,

0:16:41.400 --> 0:16:44.440
<v Speaker 1>which I think is something investors are becoming more open

0:16:44.480 --> 0:16:47.240
<v Speaker 1>to as well, probably more so than the idea that's

0:16:47.280 --> 0:16:49.960
<v Speaker 1>been floated around of them paying a one time dividend. Now,

0:16:50.040 --> 0:16:52.280
<v Speaker 1>as I noted in the introduction, I mean, and I

0:16:52.320 --> 0:16:54.320
<v Speaker 1>was kind of kidding because, I mean I had never

0:16:54.360 --> 0:16:57.240
<v Speaker 1>heard of half of these companies. But uh, it's not

0:16:57.320 --> 0:17:01.520
<v Speaker 1>as if they've been completely out of the acquisition business, right,

0:17:01.520 --> 0:17:06.639
<v Speaker 1>I mean, because they bought Broun Group. They've also made

0:17:06.720 --> 0:17:12.159
<v Speaker 1>an offer for about fifty of Riverside Capital Global, Aerospace,

0:17:12.280 --> 0:17:16.840
<v Speaker 1>premium medical protection, medical liability, mutual insurance. I mean, these

0:17:16.840 --> 0:17:20.000
<v Speaker 1>are they making a lot of acquisitions. They're just tiny, right,

0:17:20.000 --> 0:17:23.200
<v Speaker 1>And I mean there was a large deal um last

0:17:23.280 --> 0:17:25.879
<v Speaker 1>year when they bought a steak in Flying J Pilot,

0:17:25.920 --> 0:17:28.159
<v Speaker 1>Flying J the stop company, which I think is a

0:17:28.640 --> 0:17:31.600
<v Speaker 1>really great deal for brickshere, but down the road they'll

0:17:31.600 --> 0:17:34.280
<v Speaker 1>be able to buy more of it. Um. It wasn't

0:17:34.320 --> 0:17:36.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, a fifty billion dollar transaction that's really going

0:17:37.000 --> 0:17:38.399
<v Speaker 1>to move the needle in the cash, But I think

0:17:38.440 --> 0:17:40.359
<v Speaker 1>it was something that really matched with their strategy. So

0:17:40.400 --> 0:17:42.720
<v Speaker 1>they're definitely active. You know, he has a lot of

0:17:42.720 --> 0:17:45.520
<v Speaker 1>people working for him that are tasked with looking for deals,

0:17:45.600 --> 0:17:48.200
<v Speaker 1>and I think there's just a lot of pressure right now,

0:17:48.640 --> 0:17:50.800
<v Speaker 1>not just because the cash is so high, but because

0:17:50.840 --> 0:17:53.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, Buffett is turning eighty eight later this month,

0:17:53.400 --> 0:17:55.679
<v Speaker 1>and you don't want to leave his successor with the

0:17:55.760 --> 0:17:58.399
<v Speaker 1>challenge of having all this cash and also trying to

0:17:58.440 --> 0:18:01.600
<v Speaker 1>make investors comfortable with someone other than Buffet running the company.

0:18:01.640 --> 0:18:03.000
<v Speaker 1>So I think he can make it a little bit

0:18:03.040 --> 0:18:05.320
<v Speaker 1>easier for the next in line if he can do

0:18:05.359 --> 0:18:07.360
<v Speaker 1>something to chip away at that cash with the deal

0:18:07.400 --> 0:18:10.680
<v Speaker 1>that investors really like. Well, just to note that Flying

0:18:11.240 --> 0:18:14.879
<v Speaker 1>J acquisition Pilot Flying JA acquisition that was only for

0:18:14.920 --> 0:18:17.919
<v Speaker 1>about the company right exactly, so they have the option

0:18:17.960 --> 0:18:20.000
<v Speaker 1>to buy more later on. But yeah, they don't. You know,

0:18:20.040 --> 0:18:23.280
<v Speaker 1>it's not completely in the Berkshire house. It wasn't you know,

0:18:23.400 --> 0:18:25.120
<v Speaker 1>the kind of deal that people were looking for, though

0:18:25.160 --> 0:18:27.000
<v Speaker 1>I think it was a good one. Do you get

0:18:27.040 --> 0:18:31.280
<v Speaker 1>the sense that investors in Berkshire Hathaway are eager for

0:18:31.440 --> 0:18:34.280
<v Speaker 1>warm Buffet to spend the money or are they content

0:18:34.400 --> 0:18:37.359
<v Speaker 1>to just sit and wait for a big market downturn

0:18:37.840 --> 0:18:41.160
<v Speaker 1>and see an opportunity evolve. It depends who you ask.

0:18:41.280 --> 0:18:43.879
<v Speaker 1>I've talked to a few different shareholders in recent weeks

0:18:43.880 --> 0:18:46.080
<v Speaker 1>and months about this, and I think a lot of

0:18:46.119 --> 0:18:48.720
<v Speaker 1>them are really patient, and then some other one, some

0:18:48.760 --> 0:18:51.280
<v Speaker 1>of the younger ones that are looking ahead at you know,

0:18:51.320 --> 0:18:53.160
<v Speaker 1>who's going to be running the company. I think they're

0:18:53.200 --> 0:18:55.280
<v Speaker 1>looking at it from the standpoint that I was saying

0:18:55.320 --> 0:18:58.520
<v Speaker 1>earlier that you know, it would be really hard for

0:18:58.640 --> 0:19:01.040
<v Speaker 1>someone other than Buffett to do, would deal of that size.

0:19:01.040 --> 0:19:03.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, he gets these deal sweeteners because of who

0:19:03.600 --> 0:19:06.000
<v Speaker 1>he is and because the honor it's it's sort of

0:19:06.000 --> 0:19:08.960
<v Speaker 1>perceived to be to be acquired by Berkshire. And I

0:19:09.040 --> 0:19:10.640
<v Speaker 1>don't know if it's going to be that easy for

0:19:10.720 --> 0:19:13.760
<v Speaker 1>his successor to to maintain that. So I think from

0:19:13.760 --> 0:19:16.000
<v Speaker 1>that standpoint and makes sense to do as much as

0:19:16.040 --> 0:19:18.080
<v Speaker 1>they can now with that money. But it's not as

0:19:18.160 --> 0:19:21.760
<v Speaker 1>if Berkshire Hathaway is not being opportunistic in actually selling

0:19:22.040 --> 0:19:25.720
<v Speaker 1>steaks as well. For example, that Philips sixties six divestiture

0:19:26.000 --> 0:19:28.680
<v Speaker 1>right which some people were also puzzled by that. UM

0:19:28.720 --> 0:19:30.440
<v Speaker 1>I was interested to see what they were going to

0:19:30.520 --> 0:19:32.280
<v Speaker 1>do with Kraft Hinds. I think it's getting to the

0:19:32.320 --> 0:19:35.320
<v Speaker 1>point where I really don't understand why Warren Buffett likes

0:19:35.320 --> 0:19:37.840
<v Speaker 1>the stock so much. UM I don't know why Berkshire

0:19:37.880 --> 0:19:40.400
<v Speaker 1>is still in it. I think that him stepping away

0:19:40.400 --> 0:19:42.479
<v Speaker 1>from the board, while that was mostly due to him

0:19:42.480 --> 0:19:44.880
<v Speaker 1>wanting to reduce his travel commitments, I think it could

0:19:44.960 --> 0:19:47.920
<v Speaker 1>be a precursor to them backing off of Kraft Hinds.

0:19:47.960 --> 0:19:51.000
<v Speaker 1>I just don't think if it never really did fit

0:19:51.320 --> 0:19:54.159
<v Speaker 1>the kind of Berkshire investment that we're used to seeing,

0:19:54.200 --> 0:19:56.320
<v Speaker 1>but he always was able to justify in what way

0:19:56.400 --> 0:19:59.200
<v Speaker 1>is it because it didn't give them total control? Well?

0:19:59.240 --> 0:20:01.600
<v Speaker 1>I think also the strategy you know, Kraft Times is

0:20:01.680 --> 0:20:04.480
<v Speaker 1>run by three G private equity firm. They're really good

0:20:04.480 --> 0:20:08.000
<v Speaker 1>at cutting costs and boosting profits. Craft Times became very

0:20:08.040 --> 0:20:10.800
<v Speaker 1>easily one of the most profitable companies in the food space.

0:20:10.840 --> 0:20:13.280
<v Speaker 1>But I think, you know, that's kind of maxing out now.

0:20:13.320 --> 0:20:16.239
<v Speaker 1>They're not really investing for long term growth, even though

0:20:16.280 --> 0:20:19.040
<v Speaker 1>they keep talking about it. And I think, you know,

0:20:19.080 --> 0:20:22.159
<v Speaker 1>Warren Buffett looks long term, and when you look at

0:20:22.200 --> 0:20:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Kraft Times, I don't know what that long term picture

0:20:25.240 --> 0:20:28.160
<v Speaker 1>could be. Campbell, right, I mean they could buy Campbell Soup.

0:20:28.160 --> 0:20:29.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that that does much for them. Sure,

0:20:30.000 --> 0:20:32.119
<v Speaker 1>they could fire a lot of Campbell's people, cut a

0:20:32.119 --> 0:20:34.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of costs U I'm sure they can make the

0:20:34.240 --> 0:20:38.159
<v Speaker 1>business leaner, but that's a temporary boost. I think, you know,

0:20:38.200 --> 0:20:41.320
<v Speaker 1>long term, Campbell Soup does not give them international exposure.

0:20:41.320 --> 0:20:45.280
<v Speaker 1>It's almost entirely North America. And then you know, on

0:20:45.359 --> 0:20:47.760
<v Speaker 1>top of it, it's not a growing business by any means.

0:20:47.840 --> 0:20:49.800
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know how this really helps them in

0:20:49.840 --> 0:20:53.119
<v Speaker 1>the long run. Is there a particular industry that you

0:20:53.160 --> 0:20:55.639
<v Speaker 1>think that Warren Buffett and Berkshire hath to Weigh are

0:20:55.680 --> 0:20:59.200
<v Speaker 1>focused on. I think they do. Like the consumer staples space.

0:20:59.240 --> 0:21:02.240
<v Speaker 1>I think companies with really strong brand names, um, you know,

0:21:02.359 --> 0:21:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Costco comes up a lot because Costco has this membership

0:21:06.560 --> 0:21:08.600
<v Speaker 1>that's almost functions like a float, and it's that kind

0:21:08.640 --> 0:21:11.080
<v Speaker 1>of brand, really strong brand equity that you could see

0:21:11.600 --> 0:21:14.359
<v Speaker 1>being something almost like the premium that is paid in

0:21:14.400 --> 0:21:17.119
<v Speaker 1>an insurance in exactly very similar. So I think he

0:21:17.160 --> 0:21:20.080
<v Speaker 1>could be drawn to that business. Um, companies like Nike

0:21:20.240 --> 0:21:23.479
<v Speaker 1>have come up. You know, uh, deer always comes up.

0:21:23.960 --> 0:21:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Steak in Apple Apple. Yes, Um, a lot of industrial

0:21:27.880 --> 0:21:30.679
<v Speaker 1>companies fit with the Berkshire strategy. But of course, you know,

0:21:30.720 --> 0:21:34.160
<v Speaker 1>as we see with Apple, his investing lieutenants could take

0:21:34.200 --> 0:21:35.959
<v Speaker 1>them a different direction. I mean it seems like they

0:21:35.960 --> 0:21:38.880
<v Speaker 1>are open to tech or consumer electronics. So I think

0:21:38.920 --> 0:21:41.960
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot out there. It's just prices the sticking point. Well,

0:21:42.080 --> 0:21:45.280
<v Speaker 1>right now, the shares of Berkshire Hathaway, the A shares,

0:21:45.640 --> 0:21:48.920
<v Speaker 1>they are up about five and a half percent so

0:21:49.000 --> 0:21:51.120
<v Speaker 1>far this year, So I have to wait and see

0:21:51.160 --> 0:21:55.159
<v Speaker 1>what happens. Much appreciated Tara la Chapelle are Bloomberg opinion

0:21:55.200 --> 0:21:59.640
<v Speaker 1>columnists covering deals and that means Berkshire Hathaway as many

0:21:59.720 --> 0:22:02.960
<v Speaker 1>other companies. And also once again, you can follow Tara

0:22:03.040 --> 0:22:05.880
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter. Go ahead, I'm gonna let you say at

0:22:05.880 --> 0:22:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Tara Lash. The last name is too long. Diffit into

0:22:08.040 --> 0:22:12.280
<v Speaker 1>Twitter handle. It is t A r A l A

0:22:12.440 --> 0:22:27.560
<v Speaker 1>c H. I'm pim Fox. If you believe technology skills

0:22:27.600 --> 0:22:31.600
<v Speaker 1>will land you a job with regular pay increases, well

0:22:31.600 --> 0:22:34.240
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna have to listen to Harley Lippman, the chief

0:22:34.280 --> 0:22:37.760
<v Speaker 1>executive and the founder of Genesis ten. This is one

0:22:37.760 --> 0:22:41.440
<v Speaker 1>of the nation's largest I T services and staffing firms,

0:22:41.760 --> 0:22:44.000
<v Speaker 1>and he joins US now. Harley Lippman, thanks very much

0:22:44.000 --> 0:22:46.480
<v Speaker 1>for being with us. So, if you believe that having

0:22:46.480 --> 0:22:49.080
<v Speaker 1>those tech skills means you're gonna have a great job

0:22:49.160 --> 0:22:52.879
<v Speaker 1>with regular pay increases, should you rethink that? No, not

0:22:52.960 --> 0:22:56.919
<v Speaker 1>at all. Actually, um, even though wages have been flat

0:22:57.040 --> 0:23:01.240
<v Speaker 1>for quite a while, especially because US big co operations

0:23:01.320 --> 0:23:05.479
<v Speaker 1>have been able to leverage volume discounts, discounts when they

0:23:05.520 --> 0:23:08.960
<v Speaker 1>work with vendors, and vendors provide a large number of

0:23:09.000 --> 0:23:13.280
<v Speaker 1>I professionals, things are going to change. They're actually wages

0:23:13.320 --> 0:23:15.880
<v Speaker 1>have been bottomed out and they're only going to go up. Well,

0:23:15.880 --> 0:23:19.000
<v Speaker 1>when you say wages have bottomed out, why have wages

0:23:19.040 --> 0:23:23.920
<v Speaker 1>in the tech sector been under pressure? Well, UH companies

0:23:23.920 --> 0:23:28.159
<v Speaker 1>have been able to keep pressure on UH. As I

0:23:28.200 --> 0:23:31.760
<v Speaker 1>mentioned a moment ago on vendors who provide I T professionals,

0:23:31.800 --> 0:23:34.359
<v Speaker 1>they've been able to keep pressure on wages because they

0:23:34.359 --> 0:23:37.560
<v Speaker 1>could leverage volume business. If you're doing business with a

0:23:37.600 --> 0:23:42.119
<v Speaker 1>fortune company and you're providing them with I T professionals,

0:23:42.720 --> 0:23:44.600
<v Speaker 1>they will leverage that will say well, if you have

0:23:44.680 --> 0:23:47.640
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of people here, we want a really big discount.

0:23:47.720 --> 0:23:50.800
<v Speaker 1>So they keep the wages low and they keep the

0:23:50.880 --> 0:23:54.359
<v Speaker 1>rates low, and vendors have been seeing margin compression. So

0:23:54.480 --> 0:23:57.080
<v Speaker 1>business for vendors has hasn't been as good as it

0:23:57.200 --> 0:23:59.560
<v Speaker 1>used to be, but now wages are going to go

0:23:59.680 --> 0:24:02.719
<v Speaker 1>up the course they're seeing turnover. They need the skills,

0:24:02.720 --> 0:24:07.280
<v Speaker 1>and especially in emerging technologies if you talk about artificial intelligence,

0:24:07.720 --> 0:24:10.040
<v Speaker 1>we're really going to see the results of that probably

0:24:10.080 --> 0:24:13.800
<v Speaker 1>in about five years from now, but until then you're

0:24:13.840 --> 0:24:16.919
<v Speaker 1>going to need I T professionals to build out the

0:24:17.040 --> 0:24:22.359
<v Speaker 1>software to support artificial intelligence. And artificial intelligence simply stated,

0:24:22.480 --> 0:24:26.199
<v Speaker 1>is the ability to do things on computers that humans

0:24:26.200 --> 0:24:32.120
<v Speaker 1>were previously doing. So what kinds of specific technology skills

0:24:32.280 --> 0:24:36.680
<v Speaker 1>are going to be in demand? Well, clearly UM cybersecurity

0:24:36.720 --> 0:24:41.560
<v Speaker 1>is high up on the list. Analytics, UM, things like DevOps.

0:24:41.640 --> 0:24:43.679
<v Speaker 1>These are technical terms but there are a lot of

0:24:43.720 --> 0:24:49.720
<v Speaker 1>skills learning Java, learning Python, uh, that is going to

0:24:49.760 --> 0:24:52.960
<v Speaker 1>be in high demand. So things will just change. Even

0:24:53.000 --> 0:24:56.480
<v Speaker 1>if you learn something in technology and a new emerging

0:24:56.640 --> 0:25:00.480
<v Speaker 1>one comes about, you could still learn it. So there's

0:25:00.480 --> 0:25:04.160
<v Speaker 1>always going to be a need for trained I T professionals.

0:25:04.520 --> 0:25:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Just keep your eye on where the emerging trends are going. Well,

0:25:07.920 --> 0:25:13.040
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned artificial intelligence. Are there specific types of programming

0:25:13.080 --> 0:25:17.160
<v Speaker 1>skills that are going to be necessary? Yes, Java and Python.

0:25:17.840 --> 0:25:21.639
<v Speaker 1>So for people who are taking computer classes or studying

0:25:21.680 --> 0:25:24.919
<v Speaker 1>computer science, I'm sure they know that, but those are

0:25:24.920 --> 0:25:27.719
<v Speaker 1>the two areas to focus on learning Python and Java.

0:25:27.960 --> 0:25:30.959
<v Speaker 1>There's a big future there. What about the use of

0:25:31.560 --> 0:25:35.800
<v Speaker 1>H one B visus the ability to attract foreign talent

0:25:35.880 --> 0:25:39.679
<v Speaker 1>in the United States and technology, Well, the companies have

0:25:39.760 --> 0:25:43.560
<v Speaker 1>been using H one B visas because that has allowed

0:25:43.600 --> 0:25:47.600
<v Speaker 1>them to keep wages at a low level. But now

0:25:48.440 --> 0:25:52.119
<v Speaker 1>companies are not taking people with H one visas because

0:25:52.160 --> 0:25:54.880
<v Speaker 1>of the uncertainty. They don't know if the visas will

0:25:54.920 --> 0:25:56.960
<v Speaker 1>be renewed, they don't know if they could get someone

0:25:57.000 --> 0:26:01.000
<v Speaker 1>of visa. It's a serious issue now. So we see

0:26:01.040 --> 0:26:05.960
<v Speaker 1>this among our clients where they want companies to replace

0:26:06.000 --> 0:26:08.840
<v Speaker 1>the h n D visa people because they don't want

0:26:08.840 --> 0:26:11.880
<v Speaker 1>them to stay on their premises, get involved in really

0:26:11.920 --> 0:26:15.080
<v Speaker 1>critical projects, and then their visas are coming out for

0:26:15.200 --> 0:26:17.480
<v Speaker 1>renewal and they have to go back to their home

0:26:17.520 --> 0:26:20.920
<v Speaker 1>country and they can't get back because Lego's government will

0:26:20.920 --> 0:26:24.879
<v Speaker 1>not renew the visas. Huge uncertainty. And if you and

0:26:24.880 --> 0:26:28.520
<v Speaker 1>and in technology, you need consistency and stability above all

0:26:28.880 --> 0:26:32.080
<v Speaker 1>predictability because you have deadlines, you have to get work done.

0:26:32.560 --> 0:26:34.920
<v Speaker 1>You can't depend on someone who may or may not

0:26:35.280 --> 0:26:37.800
<v Speaker 1>have to go back to their home country. Now, the

0:26:37.920 --> 0:26:42.840
<v Speaker 1>kinds of skills that you describe, software engineering, application development,

0:26:42.880 --> 0:26:46.240
<v Speaker 1>as well as app support and quality assurance, where are

0:26:46.240 --> 0:26:49.000
<v Speaker 1>people getting the skills in order to do that? Are

0:26:49.040 --> 0:26:52.960
<v Speaker 1>they getting that from university programs or is that something

0:26:53.000 --> 0:26:55.400
<v Speaker 1>that they have to then go out and get more

0:26:55.440 --> 0:26:59.720
<v Speaker 1>specialized consideration a little bit of both. You know, after

0:26:59.800 --> 0:27:04.680
<v Speaker 1>the the big recession of two thousand eight, American companies

0:27:04.720 --> 0:27:08.959
<v Speaker 1>by and large cut training, so people now have to

0:27:09.080 --> 0:27:11.639
<v Speaker 1>get that on their own. There's a big gap now,

0:27:12.280 --> 0:27:15.680
<v Speaker 1>and that presents real opportunity for people who really want

0:27:15.720 --> 0:27:18.400
<v Speaker 1>to get into the tech sector because that they could

0:27:18.400 --> 0:27:21.040
<v Speaker 1>get some training and there are vendors that provide it,

0:27:21.160 --> 0:27:25.080
<v Speaker 1>like we do a Genesis Tent. We provide training and

0:27:25.320 --> 0:27:28.719
<v Speaker 1>we provide domestic outsourcing. So that's what people could get trained.

0:27:29.000 --> 0:27:31.240
<v Speaker 1>So if they could get that training on their own

0:27:31.280 --> 0:27:33.520
<v Speaker 1>a little bit or through a vendor like Genesis Tent,

0:27:34.240 --> 0:27:36.560
<v Speaker 1>then they could take that and leverage that they could

0:27:36.600 --> 0:27:41.480
<v Speaker 1>get very good jobs at companies. Now you mentioned artificial intelligence,

0:27:41.720 --> 0:27:45.080
<v Speaker 1>what about robotics. Is that also an area that should

0:27:45.119 --> 0:27:47.679
<v Speaker 1>be trained for now? Oh? Yeah, that's the future of

0:27:47.760 --> 0:27:51.760
<v Speaker 1>costs robotics AI. That's the super hot area. But it's

0:27:51.800 --> 0:27:54.960
<v Speaker 1>not there yet. So a lot of people are are

0:27:55.080 --> 0:27:58.280
<v Speaker 1>getting caught up in this. And while it's important to

0:27:58.720 --> 0:28:01.240
<v Speaker 1>learn the skills as I ment and earlier learning Java,

0:28:01.359 --> 0:28:04.560
<v Speaker 1>learning Python will put you in a strong position for

0:28:04.680 --> 0:28:08.720
<v Speaker 1>artificial intelligence to your good points, it's also for robotics

0:28:08.840 --> 0:28:12.600
<v Speaker 1>very it's basically the same thing. Now there's a geographic

0:28:12.680 --> 0:28:15.600
<v Speaker 1>element to this as well, Is there not you're headquartered

0:28:15.680 --> 0:28:20.159
<v Speaker 1>in New York, you have operations in Miami Beach. Is

0:28:20.240 --> 0:28:24.160
<v Speaker 1>there a geographical tilt towards the coasts in terms of

0:28:24.640 --> 0:28:27.399
<v Speaker 1>where the talent is not at all? All over the

0:28:27.480 --> 0:28:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Hinded States and all over the world, Technology moves at

0:28:30.600 --> 0:28:35.760
<v Speaker 1>such speed that it's needed everywhere. It's needed in Des Moines, Minneapolis, Milwaukee,

0:28:35.840 --> 0:28:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City, Dallas, Atlanta. There's no one hub that is

0:28:40.160 --> 0:28:42.959
<v Speaker 1>using it, no one else is. The world is indeed

0:28:42.960 --> 0:28:45.840
<v Speaker 1>flattened that way, So it doesn't matter really where you are,

0:28:46.200 --> 0:28:49.120
<v Speaker 1>and that's the beauty of technology. Like like you know,

0:28:49.520 --> 0:28:52.880
<v Speaker 1>cell phones, emails, text, WhatsApp could be anywhere in the

0:28:52.920 --> 0:28:56.760
<v Speaker 1>world and communicate. It's the same thing with these technology skills.

0:28:56.800 --> 0:29:01.200
<v Speaker 1>But aren't costs related to geographic is is? Yes, you're

0:29:01.240 --> 0:29:04.640
<v Speaker 1>quite right on that. So a lot of companies are

0:29:04.760 --> 0:29:08.680
<v Speaker 1>looking to have more work done in lower cost areas

0:29:08.760 --> 0:29:12.400
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, the Midwest in particular, where that's

0:29:12.440 --> 0:29:15.560
<v Speaker 1>also rich in talent. But at the same time, there

0:29:15.600 --> 0:29:18.880
<v Speaker 1>are companies that have headquarters in major cities like New

0:29:18.920 --> 0:29:22.560
<v Speaker 1>York City, Atlanta, Dallas, and they need people there. So

0:29:22.640 --> 0:29:25.520
<v Speaker 1>it's a bit of a blend. You'll have some work

0:29:25.560 --> 0:29:29.000
<v Speaker 1>being done on shore but off site, as we say,

0:29:29.120 --> 0:29:31.680
<v Speaker 1>and you'll have work being done at the corporate headquarters,

0:29:31.720 --> 0:29:35.080
<v Speaker 1>which will be in the big cities. Now, Harley, just

0:29:35.120 --> 0:29:38.400
<v Speaker 1>give you about twenty seconds here. Employers around the United

0:29:38.440 --> 0:29:41.240
<v Speaker 1>States they posted more than three hundred thousand tech jobs.

0:29:41.240 --> 0:29:43.560
<v Speaker 1>This is in the month of May, for example, but

0:29:43.680 --> 0:29:46.960
<v Speaker 1>yet they only filled under nine thousand of those jobs.

0:29:47.000 --> 0:29:52.760
<v Speaker 1>What's the biggest lack of tech savvy jobs that are available?

0:29:52.840 --> 0:29:57.560
<v Speaker 1>What's the biggest vacuum here? It's it's interesting. I know

0:29:57.640 --> 0:30:00.160
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's a bit odd, isn't it. But I'll

0:30:00.160 --> 0:30:03.000
<v Speaker 1>given that there's a shortage, and you know, the unemployment

0:30:03.080 --> 0:30:05.560
<v Speaker 1>rate continues to go down to record levels and they're

0:30:05.560 --> 0:30:09.360
<v Speaker 1>not hiring basically because employers are looking for everything. If

0:30:09.360 --> 0:30:12.800
<v Speaker 1>they want fifteen things that someone has and you present

0:30:12.880 --> 0:30:16.440
<v Speaker 1>them with with twelve or thirteen, they may not take them.

0:30:16.440 --> 0:30:18.360
<v Speaker 1>They'll send the work off shore. It's just kind of

0:30:18.400 --> 0:30:22.840
<v Speaker 1>an easy but a false reaction and decision on their part.

0:30:22.920 --> 0:30:25.560
<v Speaker 1>It's got It'll catch up to them. Thanks very much.

0:30:25.560 --> 0:30:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Harley Lippman is the chief executive and the founder of

0:30:29.040 --> 0:30:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Genesis ten. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg P and

0:30:35.320 --> 0:30:38.360
<v Speaker 1>L podcast. You can subscribe and listen to interviews at

0:30:38.400 --> 0:30:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm

0:30:42.880 --> 0:30:46.320
<v Speaker 1>pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at pim Fox. I'm on

0:30:46.360 --> 0:30:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at Lisa Abramo. It's one before the podcast You

0:30:49.680 --> 0:30:52.200
<v Speaker 1>can always catch us worldwide on Bloomberg Radio.