WEBVTT - Conservatives vs. ESG

0:00:01.120 --> 0:00:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Hey, this is Tim. Happy New Year. We're on vacation

0:00:04.960 --> 0:00:07.200
<v Speaker 1>this week, but the Crash Course team wanted to re

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>air an episode we had fun making with a colleague

0:00:10.119 --> 0:00:13.720
<v Speaker 1>of ours here at Bloomberg. Sagel Kishan is a stellar

0:00:13.760 --> 0:00:16.840
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg reporter, and she wrote a really great article about

0:00:16.880 --> 0:00:20.520
<v Speaker 1>the backlash to ESG, which is an investing practice that

0:00:20.560 --> 0:00:25.320
<v Speaker 1>takes environmental, social, and governance concerns into account. We worked

0:00:25.320 --> 0:00:27.320
<v Speaker 1>with her to turn the interview for that story into

0:00:27.320 --> 0:00:30.360
<v Speaker 1>the episode that you're about to hear. Thanks for listening.

0:00:30.920 --> 0:00:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Now here's the show. Have you ever looked at the

0:00:33.800 --> 0:00:37.400
<v Speaker 1>stock market and thought, Dear Lord, my portfolio needs some help,

0:00:38.040 --> 0:00:42.479
<v Speaker 1>or thank God, it's not that bad today. Well, for

0:00:42.560 --> 0:00:46.319
<v Speaker 1>one investor in Idaho, that prayer happens every day, though

0:00:46.320 --> 0:00:47.920
<v Speaker 1>with a little less exasperation.

0:00:48.560 --> 0:00:52.320
<v Speaker 2>Heavenly Father, as we head into our week full of work,

0:00:52.320 --> 0:00:54.320
<v Speaker 2>we pray that you would go with us, that you'd

0:00:54.320 --> 0:00:56.040
<v Speaker 2>be with us, Lord, go before us.

0:00:56.520 --> 0:00:56.840
<v Speaker 3>Thank you.

0:00:56.920 --> 0:01:01.000
<v Speaker 1>That's Robert Netsley, the president and CEO of in Investing.

0:01:01.600 --> 0:01:02.959
<v Speaker 1>His company does something he.

0:01:03.000 --> 0:01:05.360
<v Speaker 2>Calls bysically responsible investing.

0:01:05.160 --> 0:01:08.800
<v Speaker 1>Biblically responsible investing for the uninitiated.

0:01:09.120 --> 0:01:12.080
<v Speaker 2>What doesn't mean to invest the Word of God means

0:01:12.440 --> 0:01:14.119
<v Speaker 2>certainly to do what you can to earn a good

0:01:14.120 --> 0:01:17.800
<v Speaker 2>return and use the returns for redemptive purposes, but also means,

0:01:17.880 --> 0:01:22.720
<v Speaker 2>like Proverbs chapter sixteen says, better is a little with righteousness,

0:01:22.720 --> 0:01:25.720
<v Speaker 2>and great gains with injustice. If there has to be

0:01:25.760 --> 0:01:29.280
<v Speaker 2>a trade off between making a ton of money or

0:01:29.720 --> 0:01:36.200
<v Speaker 2>being moral, like we should choose righteousness, morality, ethics. And

0:01:36.280 --> 0:01:38.280
<v Speaker 2>there's very few people that I think wouldn't disagree with that.

0:01:39.240 --> 0:01:42.280
<v Speaker 1>So Robert invests depending on what he thinks the Bible

0:01:42.360 --> 0:01:46.039
<v Speaker 1>might support or not support. He used to label his

0:01:46.120 --> 0:01:49.680
<v Speaker 1>offerings as faith based ESG in twenty.

0:01:49.560 --> 0:01:52.640
<v Speaker 2>Nineteen, like when the latched WWJD. It's the first fund

0:01:52.680 --> 0:01:55.880
<v Speaker 2>that had ESG in the name. What would you Do WWD?

0:01:56.560 --> 0:01:57.960
<v Speaker 1>But now it's just like.

0:01:58.040 --> 0:02:00.320
<v Speaker 2>All of a sudden, I'm talking to people who don't

0:02:00.320 --> 0:02:02.559
<v Speaker 2>even know a sock or an equity or mutual funds

0:02:02.600 --> 0:02:03.080
<v Speaker 2>and they're.

0:02:02.920 --> 0:02:04.240
<v Speaker 3>Like, oh, he is G said that.

0:02:04.360 --> 0:02:05.720
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, exactly what.

0:02:05.640 --> 0:02:06.080
<v Speaker 5>Does it means?

0:02:06.080 --> 0:02:08.760
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, but it's evil wait bad.

0:02:10.760 --> 0:02:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Crash Course, a podcast about business, political, and

0:02:14.440 --> 0:02:17.880
<v Speaker 1>social disruption and what we can learn from it. I'm

0:02:17.880 --> 0:02:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Tim O'Brien, Robert Netsley personifies a bigger war going on

0:02:22.600 --> 0:02:26.040
<v Speaker 1>in the investment world and American politics over a little

0:02:26.040 --> 0:02:30.200
<v Speaker 1>acronym called ESG. In the last year, there's been a

0:02:30.200 --> 0:02:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Republican backlash to the trillions of dollars committed to investing

0:02:34.440 --> 0:02:39.359
<v Speaker 1>practices that take environmental, social, and governance concerns into account.

0:02:40.440 --> 0:02:44.320
<v Speaker 1>And then there's Robert. He's an evangelical Christian trying to

0:02:44.360 --> 0:02:47.240
<v Speaker 1>realize his values and stay true to his own beliefs

0:02:47.240 --> 0:02:50.919
<v Speaker 1>in the investing world. That's sometimes intersex with Wall Street's

0:02:51.200 --> 0:02:56.720
<v Speaker 1>ESG strategy, but it also lays bare some contradictions. My

0:02:56.840 --> 0:03:01.240
<v Speaker 1>colleague Sagel Kishan reports on ESG and staying for Bloomberg News,

0:03:01.560 --> 0:03:04.600
<v Speaker 1>and she flew to Idaho to meet with Robert. She

0:03:04.680 --> 0:03:08.480
<v Speaker 1>wrote a fascinating piece last fall called what would Jesus buy?

0:03:09.280 --> 0:03:13.519
<v Speaker 1>Investor charts course for two billion dollar fund and she's

0:03:13.560 --> 0:03:15.600
<v Speaker 1>going to share more of that story with us for

0:03:15.720 --> 0:03:21.920
<v Speaker 1>today's crash course Conservatives versus ESG. It's a tale of

0:03:21.919 --> 0:03:24.959
<v Speaker 1>two conflicts in a way, should there be biases in

0:03:25.000 --> 0:03:28.680
<v Speaker 1>the investing world, be it faith based or social activism?

0:03:29.040 --> 0:03:35.200
<v Speaker 1>And should ESG exist at all? Welcome to the show, Stagel,

0:03:35.480 --> 0:03:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for having me. So before we dive back into

0:03:38.640 --> 0:03:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Robert's story, I want listeners to get to know you

0:03:41.760 --> 0:03:44.280
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more. You've been at Bloomberg about twenty

0:03:44.360 --> 0:03:46.480
<v Speaker 1>years now. And how long have you been on the

0:03:46.680 --> 0:03:47.240
<v Speaker 1>ESG beat.

0:03:47.640 --> 0:03:50.080
<v Speaker 4>It's just over three years, just before the pandemic. We

0:03:50.080 --> 0:03:51.920
<v Speaker 4>start to the beat, and why ESG?

0:03:52.120 --> 0:03:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Why do you love this little corner of the market.

0:03:54.600 --> 0:03:59.560
<v Speaker 4>It's complex, it's undefined, it's everywhere but nowhere. Just trying

0:03:59.560 --> 0:04:02.200
<v Speaker 4>to figure out the complexities is what draw me to

0:04:02.240 --> 0:04:02.600
<v Speaker 4>the beat.

0:04:02.840 --> 0:04:05.800
<v Speaker 1>And you're good at solving complexities. I wish Oh, I

0:04:05.840 --> 0:04:08.480
<v Speaker 1>bet you are. I think you are. That's why you're here. Now.

0:04:08.640 --> 0:04:11.720
<v Speaker 1>How did you find out about Robert Netsley? What attracted

0:04:11.760 --> 0:04:12.800
<v Speaker 1>you to him as a story?

0:04:13.280 --> 0:04:13.440
<v Speaker 6>Well?

0:04:13.480 --> 0:04:16.159
<v Speaker 4>I first heard about him after the shooting in Yavaldi,

0:04:16.320 --> 0:04:19.680
<v Speaker 4>Texas last year, and I was looking at whether esh

0:04:19.880 --> 0:04:24.120
<v Speaker 4>funds held gunstocks and I thought, obviously no. But then

0:04:24.160 --> 0:04:26.920
<v Speaker 4>I found his funds and we found that he held

0:04:26.960 --> 0:04:30.919
<v Speaker 4>shares in the firearms company called stm Rugger, one of

0:04:30.960 --> 0:04:34.480
<v Speaker 4>the big ones, and a shooting sports company called Vista Outdoor.

0:04:35.000 --> 0:04:38.800
<v Speaker 4>So I called him. He said that gun violence is deplorable,

0:04:39.120 --> 0:04:43.800
<v Speaker 4>but guns themselves aren't unethical or immoral by themselves. I

0:04:43.839 --> 0:04:46.000
<v Speaker 4>remember thinking it was a little weird, but to me

0:04:46.120 --> 0:04:48.960
<v Speaker 4>it was new to hear about a conservative version of ESHI.

0:04:49.640 --> 0:04:51.920
<v Speaker 4>I knew I had to learn more, so I helped

0:04:51.920 --> 0:04:53.880
<v Speaker 4>on a plane and feutre boise last year.

0:04:55.400 --> 0:04:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Okay, well, so why don't you take over the story

0:04:57.360 --> 0:04:59.480
<v Speaker 1>from there, and then we'll meet back here later in

0:04:59.520 --> 0:05:02.360
<v Speaker 1>the eppisode to talk more about ESG and.

0:05:02.360 --> 0:05:15.320
<v Speaker 4>What you've learned sounds great, Robert Nesle is a small

0:05:15.400 --> 0:05:18.640
<v Speaker 4>part of a bigger clash that's going on in America.

0:05:18.839 --> 0:05:23.000
<v Speaker 4>Red versus blue, and the worlds of financing investing haven't

0:05:23.000 --> 0:05:28.680
<v Speaker 4>been immune. EESG, which stands for Environmental, Social and Governance Investing,

0:05:29.120 --> 0:05:32.800
<v Speaker 4>has become a pinata and dragged into the cultural wars.

0:05:33.480 --> 0:05:37.200
<v Speaker 4>On the one hand, proponents of ESG say it's important

0:05:37.240 --> 0:05:40.799
<v Speaker 4>to take into account things like climate change and workers'

0:05:40.880 --> 0:05:46.560
<v Speaker 4>rights when making financing and investing decisions, especially amid societal changes,

0:05:47.040 --> 0:05:52.039
<v Speaker 4>regulation and pressing problems like global warming, when opponents on

0:05:52.080 --> 0:05:55.719
<v Speaker 4>the political right say ESG has become a way for

0:05:55.839 --> 0:06:00.279
<v Speaker 4>progressives to impose their views and their goals on financial markets,

0:06:01.200 --> 0:06:04.760
<v Speaker 4>essentially a threat to the American way of doing business.

0:06:05.480 --> 0:06:08.080
<v Speaker 4>Robert Nesley is somewhere in the middle of those two.

0:06:08.520 --> 0:06:11.960
<v Speaker 4>He's a bit of an anomaly. He straddles both sides.

0:06:12.680 --> 0:06:15.240
<v Speaker 4>In one sense, he is a faith based investor who

0:06:15.279 --> 0:06:19.200
<v Speaker 4>excludes things like tobacco and alcohol from his portfolio. On

0:06:19.279 --> 0:06:22.960
<v Speaker 4>the other he invests in gun makers and pushes back

0:06:23.040 --> 0:06:27.240
<v Speaker 4>on things like LGBTQ issues. We'll get into more of

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:30.880
<v Speaker 4>that later, but first I want you to hear where

0:06:30.960 --> 0:06:36.280
<v Speaker 4>Robert came from. He grew up in California, in the

0:06:36.279 --> 0:06:40.160
<v Speaker 4>Monterey Bay area. His parents married right out of high

0:06:40.160 --> 0:06:43.080
<v Speaker 4>school and had Roberts and his younger brother not long

0:06:43.120 --> 0:06:48.000
<v Speaker 4>after that. His mom stopped using drugs, but his dad didn't.

0:06:48.120 --> 0:06:48.960
<v Speaker 3>So they got the worst one.

0:06:48.960 --> 0:06:51.479
<v Speaker 2>I was about three, reading by my mom, my younger

0:06:51.480 --> 0:06:55.160
<v Speaker 2>brother's artistic in on food stamps for a little bit,

0:06:55.160 --> 0:06:56.960
<v Speaker 2>and all that kind of thing, going through life, and

0:06:57.720 --> 0:06:59.120
<v Speaker 2>just really seeing the faithlesser going.

0:06:59.040 --> 0:06:59.880
<v Speaker 3>Through all of that.

0:07:00.680 --> 0:07:04.320
<v Speaker 4>As evangelical Christians, they went to church. The community there

0:07:04.360 --> 0:07:07.360
<v Speaker 4>gave Robert sability and he had a sense that God

0:07:07.440 --> 0:07:10.680
<v Speaker 4>was providing for his family. But he really found God

0:07:10.720 --> 0:07:13.240
<v Speaker 4>one day when he was seven years old and on

0:07:13.360 --> 0:07:13.920
<v Speaker 4>time out.

0:07:14.520 --> 0:07:20.480
<v Speaker 2>I remember this really feeling like sorry for myself whatever, whatever,

0:07:20.480 --> 0:07:23.760
<v Speaker 2>nobody loves me, YadA, yah YadA, And you know, writing

0:07:23.760 --> 0:07:27.200
<v Speaker 2>in my ciddy and it's remembering what the pastor said

0:07:27.200 --> 0:07:31.080
<v Speaker 2>that you know, Jesus loves you actually and he will

0:07:32.040 --> 0:07:34.920
<v Speaker 2>forgive you of your sin. And as a seven year

0:07:34.920 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 2>old does, I remember praying and asking Jesus to come

0:07:38.040 --> 0:07:40.400
<v Speaker 2>into my heart, you know, and I give him mind

0:07:40.400 --> 0:07:42.920
<v Speaker 2>to him there and then that's when personally I made

0:07:42.920 --> 0:07:45.720
<v Speaker 2>a decision to really follow Christ in a very childlike way.

0:07:46.360 --> 0:07:49.440
<v Speaker 4>Robert went to community college then later got his college

0:07:49.440 --> 0:07:52.440
<v Speaker 4>degree online. In between that, he met his wife at

0:07:52.440 --> 0:07:55.800
<v Speaker 4>a tiny church in his hometown. They lived a life

0:07:55.800 --> 0:07:59.480
<v Speaker 4>of what he called intentional ministry, doing work in the

0:07:59.480 --> 0:08:03.080
<v Speaker 4>community in the name of God. He worked with high

0:08:03.120 --> 0:08:06.680
<v Speaker 4>schoolers with disabilities and at a pro life pregnancy center.

0:08:07.560 --> 0:08:09.600
<v Speaker 4>When he and his wife started having kids and needed

0:08:09.600 --> 0:08:12.760
<v Speaker 4>more money, he got a job at a Volkswagen dealership

0:08:13.040 --> 0:08:16.080
<v Speaker 4>until it closed during the two thousand and eight financial crisis.

0:08:16.360 --> 0:08:18.560
<v Speaker 2>On my way home from getting let go, when they

0:08:18.600 --> 0:08:21.600
<v Speaker 2>told everybody, you know what was going on, like ahead

0:08:21.720 --> 0:08:24.160
<v Speaker 2>was kind of spending respecting our second baby, and like,

0:08:24.200 --> 0:08:25.480
<v Speaker 2>I don't know what I'm going to do, So we

0:08:25.840 --> 0:08:29.360
<v Speaker 2>just kind of pulled over and spraying and really felt

0:08:29.400 --> 0:08:30.920
<v Speaker 2>the piece of God to say, like, you know what,

0:08:31.080 --> 0:08:33.680
<v Speaker 2>you've never liked that job anyway, this is your opportunity

0:08:33.720 --> 0:08:36.200
<v Speaker 2>to do whatever you want to do and.

0:08:36.120 --> 0:08:36.880
<v Speaker 3>I'll take care of it.

0:08:38.440 --> 0:08:41.200
<v Speaker 4>So he thought about what jobs could have family friendly hours,

0:08:41.360 --> 0:08:43.319
<v Speaker 4>and he decided to look for a job at a bank.

0:08:44.120 --> 0:08:46.280
<v Speaker 4>He applied to everything he could, and then he got

0:08:46.280 --> 0:08:49.920
<v Speaker 4>a gig with Wells Fargo in their investment department. Even

0:08:49.960 --> 0:08:52.800
<v Speaker 4>though math was his worst subject in school, he picked

0:08:52.840 --> 0:08:55.760
<v Speaker 4>it up really quickly, got license and moved into a

0:08:55.840 --> 0:08:59.480
<v Speaker 4>role advising clients on their investments. He says he was

0:08:59.520 --> 0:09:02.880
<v Speaker 4>happy as clam until decided to lead a Bible study

0:09:03.080 --> 0:09:06.480
<v Speaker 4>on finances at his church. He wanted to talk about

0:09:06.480 --> 0:09:09.240
<v Speaker 4>what the Bible teaches people about money. So he starts

0:09:09.240 --> 0:09:10.640
<v Speaker 4>for searching and then.

0:09:10.559 --> 0:09:14.120
<v Speaker 2>Some article came up about the response investing like investing

0:09:14.160 --> 0:09:18.520
<v Speaker 2>interesting click and introduced this concept of Hayrid thought about

0:09:18.600 --> 0:09:22.360
<v Speaker 2>what the companies you own, like you're an owner, what

0:09:22.400 --> 0:09:25.040
<v Speaker 2>they're actually doing to make money? Right? And so if

0:09:25.040 --> 0:09:27.480
<v Speaker 2>you own Netflix or whatever videos like would you have

0:09:27.520 --> 0:09:29.480
<v Speaker 2>a video store that sold pornography videos in the back?

0:09:29.800 --> 0:09:32.440
<v Speaker 2>Like no, I wouldn't, and yet that's exactly what we

0:09:32.520 --> 0:09:33.719
<v Speaker 2>do as shareholders.

0:09:34.120 --> 0:09:36.320
<v Speaker 4>Robert says, there are lots of scriptures in the Bible

0:09:36.440 --> 0:09:38.680
<v Speaker 4>that say it's bad to make money off of things

0:09:38.679 --> 0:09:39.120
<v Speaker 4>that are.

0:09:39.000 --> 0:09:41.400
<v Speaker 3>Immoral, that is attestable to the Lord.

0:09:41.880 --> 0:09:44.560
<v Speaker 4>So he turned to his own investments, and he quickly

0:09:44.559 --> 0:09:47.160
<v Speaker 4>found what he considers to be a major red flag.

0:09:48.120 --> 0:09:51.840
<v Speaker 4>He had been investing in companies that manufacture aborta fashions

0:09:51.960 --> 0:09:55.480
<v Speaker 4>or drugs that help end a pregnancy. His heart sank.

0:09:56.360 --> 0:09:59.640
<v Speaker 4>Remember he was the president of a pro life pregnancy center,

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:03.280
<v Speaker 4>and his reading of the Bible concluded that abortion is bad,

0:10:03.960 --> 0:10:06.960
<v Speaker 4>So that investment was a complete no no for him.

0:10:06.800 --> 0:10:09.839
<v Speaker 2>I remember sitting in my desk sort of slack job

0:10:09.920 --> 0:10:13.800
<v Speaker 2>like this son, that this was something that I had missed,

0:10:13.800 --> 0:10:17.920
<v Speaker 2>that the church is obviously missing, and that I couldn't

0:10:17.920 --> 0:10:20.320
<v Speaker 2>do my job like somebody came to mist right now

0:10:20.360 --> 0:10:21.520
<v Speaker 2>and asked me to play the trade.

0:10:21.320 --> 0:10:24.720
<v Speaker 3>Like I couldn't do it with a queen conscience. And

0:10:24.760 --> 0:10:27.560
<v Speaker 3>then I go craps because what else was I going

0:10:27.640 --> 0:10:29.880
<v Speaker 3>to do? And so it's incredibly frightening.

0:10:30.400 --> 0:10:32.800
<v Speaker 4>So he quit the bank, and he said he felt

0:10:32.800 --> 0:10:36.120
<v Speaker 4>God was calling him to do something else, he dabbled

0:10:36.200 --> 0:10:39.679
<v Speaker 4>with what he called biblically responsible investing, and then in

0:10:39.679 --> 0:10:44.240
<v Speaker 4>twenty fifteen he started his own firm called Inspire Investing. Essentially,

0:10:44.480 --> 0:10:48.760
<v Speaker 4>Inspire invests in companies it seems worthy, engages with those

0:10:48.800 --> 0:10:52.160
<v Speaker 4>that it hopes to convert, and excludes or divest from

0:10:52.240 --> 0:10:53.720
<v Speaker 4>ones that it finds immoral.

0:10:53.960 --> 0:11:00.520
<v Speaker 2>In the Apostle Paul, in one of his letters to churches,

0:11:01.080 --> 0:11:03.320
<v Speaker 2>it talks about how he's like he's compelled to preach

0:11:03.360 --> 0:11:05.400
<v Speaker 2>the gospel and there's there's nothing else that he can do.

0:11:05.440 --> 0:11:07.160
<v Speaker 3>He's just he's compelled to preach the gospel.

0:11:07.800 --> 0:11:09.640
<v Speaker 2>And I really felt like that, like I'm compelled, like

0:11:09.640 --> 0:11:12.720
<v Speaker 2>there's nothing else I can do other than then this,

0:11:13.360 --> 0:11:16.959
<v Speaker 2>you know, goes share this story with people, and I

0:11:16.960 --> 0:11:19.040
<v Speaker 2>don't know how it's going to end up, you.

0:11:18.960 --> 0:11:20.959
<v Speaker 3>Know, maybe terribly financially, but this is what I have

0:11:21.080 --> 0:11:21.240
<v Speaker 3>to do.

0:11:21.600 --> 0:11:23.040
<v Speaker 2>So of course of my eye step out of the mote,

0:11:23.200 --> 0:11:26.640
<v Speaker 2>and you know, trusted God, and he's been he's been faithful.

0:11:28.400 --> 0:11:31.280
<v Speaker 4>The market was exceptionally bad last year because of inflation,

0:11:31.640 --> 0:11:34.439
<v Speaker 4>the war in the Ukraine, and fears of a global overcession.

0:11:35.080 --> 0:11:37.280
<v Speaker 4>So maybe it doesn't mean a lot that his biggest

0:11:37.280 --> 0:11:40.960
<v Speaker 4>fund slumped about twenty four percent last year. If we

0:11:40.960 --> 0:11:44.440
<v Speaker 4>look back to a good year twenty nineteen, his fund

0:11:44.480 --> 0:11:46.720
<v Speaker 4>was up twenty eight percent, but it was still slightly

0:11:46.760 --> 0:11:50.520
<v Speaker 4>below the overall startle markets. But remember what Robert said

0:11:50.520 --> 0:11:53.440
<v Speaker 4>at the beginning of this episode. For him, it's not

0:11:53.679 --> 0:11:56.320
<v Speaker 4>all about making money.

0:11:56.400 --> 0:11:58.559
<v Speaker 2>I'm not an investor who's a Christian, like I'm a

0:11:58.640 --> 0:12:00.480
<v Speaker 2>Christian who has to work and investment industry.

0:12:01.160 --> 0:12:05.160
<v Speaker 4>Many of the biggest and most profitable companies are excluded

0:12:05.160 --> 0:12:08.440
<v Speaker 4>from his portfolio, which is almost a guarantee that his

0:12:08.559 --> 0:12:10.240
<v Speaker 4>investments will underperform.

0:12:10.440 --> 0:12:14.760
<v Speaker 2>We exclude companies that you know, support legislation that is

0:12:15.440 --> 0:12:18.959
<v Speaker 2>anpathetical to a biblical viewpoint, like pushes a certagy or

0:12:19.120 --> 0:12:22.600
<v Speaker 2>doing money to an activist organization that's explicitly pushing an

0:12:22.640 --> 0:12:24.240
<v Speaker 2>unbiblable viewpoint on those areas.

0:12:27.000 --> 0:12:30.240
<v Speaker 4>So Robert's reading of the Bible says abortion is bad.

0:12:31.000 --> 0:12:33.280
<v Speaker 4>We'll think of all the companies that announce that they

0:12:33.320 --> 0:12:36.400
<v Speaker 4>would pay for employees to travel for an abortion after

0:12:36.440 --> 0:12:41.040
<v Speaker 4>the Supreme Court overturn rov Wade last summer, They're out

0:12:41.080 --> 0:12:45.320
<v Speaker 4>of his portfolio. Also excluded all of the companies that

0:12:45.400 --> 0:12:49.440
<v Speaker 4>support or finance floats during the Pride Parade. His reading

0:12:49.480 --> 0:12:53.920
<v Speaker 4>of the Bible isn't supportive of LGBTQ rights either. I'll

0:12:53.960 --> 0:12:56.760
<v Speaker 4>just note here that while Netley says that he loves

0:12:56.800 --> 0:13:01.320
<v Speaker 4>his LGBTQ neighbors, he doesn't want what he describes as

0:13:01.360 --> 0:13:06.400
<v Speaker 4>their lifestyles promoted in society and by companies. Nor does

0:13:06.440 --> 0:13:09.120
<v Speaker 4>he want companies to discriminate against people like Kim in

0:13:09.160 --> 0:13:13.520
<v Speaker 4>the workplace who hold more traditional views on marriage. So

0:13:13.920 --> 0:13:17.920
<v Speaker 4>abortion access and LGBTQ rights are only two issues, but

0:13:18.000 --> 0:13:20.320
<v Speaker 4>they put a lot of companies on the exclude list.

0:13:21.480 --> 0:13:25.240
<v Speaker 4>Other companies are shunned for reasons such as distributing pornography,

0:13:25.720 --> 0:13:30.200
<v Speaker 4>selling tobacco and alcohol products, funding stem cell research, and

0:13:30.240 --> 0:13:35.600
<v Speaker 4>promoting in vitro fertilization. All in all, Robert says Inspire

0:13:35.760 --> 0:13:39.760
<v Speaker 4>excludes about half of this in P. Five hundred, companies

0:13:39.840 --> 0:13:47.720
<v Speaker 4>like Amazon, Walmart's Apple, and Google's parent company alphabets. In

0:13:47.760 --> 0:13:50.360
<v Speaker 4>an effort to limit the number of companies on the

0:13:50.440 --> 0:13:55.160
<v Speaker 4>exclude list, Robert will often press executives, encouraging them to

0:13:55.200 --> 0:14:00.000
<v Speaker 4>avoid what he says is politicization. Here's one examples.

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:03.160
<v Speaker 7>So, who likes costco wholesale fans of free samples in

0:14:03.160 --> 0:14:03.480
<v Speaker 7>the room.

0:14:03.760 --> 0:14:07.000
<v Speaker 4>He's on the stage at a conservative conference in twenty eighteen.

0:14:07.480 --> 0:14:09.839
<v Speaker 7>Last summer, we were alerted to the fact that they

0:14:09.880 --> 0:14:13.400
<v Speaker 7>had begun sponsoring certain gay pride parades throughout the country,

0:14:13.800 --> 0:14:17.559
<v Speaker 7>a handful of different cities. Obviously, this is concerning to us.

0:14:18.000 --> 0:14:19.800
<v Speaker 7>So I picked up the phone and I just called

0:14:19.840 --> 0:14:21.640
<v Speaker 7>Investor Relations, he said.

0:14:21.680 --> 0:14:25.080
<v Speaker 4>The CFO called him back and they had several conversations.

0:14:25.480 --> 0:14:28.120
<v Speaker 7>About six weeks after that initial phone call, got another

0:14:28.160 --> 0:14:31.200
<v Speaker 7>call from this gentleman telling us that Costco had made

0:14:31.200 --> 0:14:34.200
<v Speaker 7>the executive decision not to support divisive issues his word,

0:14:34.240 --> 0:14:37.120
<v Speaker 7>divisive issues such as gay pride parades.

0:14:38.160 --> 0:14:41.760
<v Speaker 4>Costco wouldn't respond to requests for comment, but these sorts

0:14:41.760 --> 0:14:45.040
<v Speaker 4>of campaigns show that his work is about more than

0:14:45.160 --> 0:14:49.440
<v Speaker 4>just investing in this faith. He's having an influence. It

0:14:49.440 --> 0:14:52.360
<v Speaker 4>doesn't always go his way, though, He says he's tried

0:14:52.360 --> 0:14:56.800
<v Speaker 4>to persuade Smuckers against supporting lgbth wrights and other quality issues.

0:14:57.480 --> 0:15:00.440
<v Speaker 4>He's also tried to press six Sporting Goods against paying

0:15:00.480 --> 0:15:06.480
<v Speaker 4>for employee travel for abortions, but so far he's been unsuccessful. Yet,

0:15:06.600 --> 0:15:08.680
<v Speaker 4>Robert says he avoids the shame game.

0:15:08.840 --> 0:15:13.400
<v Speaker 2>One of the big criticisms of physically responsible investing generally

0:15:13.480 --> 0:15:16.800
<v Speaker 2>is that it can be easily perceived or assumed that

0:15:16.880 --> 0:15:19.800
<v Speaker 2>it's a guilt trip game, right, like, hey, did you

0:15:19.840 --> 0:15:20.880
<v Speaker 2>know that you're invested in this thing?

0:15:20.960 --> 0:15:21.200
<v Speaker 6>Shame?

0:15:21.880 --> 0:15:24.920
<v Speaker 2>And unfortunately, I think historically there have been those that

0:15:24.920 --> 0:15:27.920
<v Speaker 2>have taken that approach. Good intentions maybe, but you know,

0:15:28.200 --> 0:15:30.360
<v Speaker 2>run approach. And you know, we've heard a lot of people,

0:15:30.440 --> 0:15:32.480
<v Speaker 2>especially from the early days and like before we got

0:15:32.480 --> 0:15:35.000
<v Speaker 2>involved in like the decades, you know, nineties and eighties

0:15:35.000 --> 0:15:37.640
<v Speaker 2>and whatnot, that that really was the perception that it

0:15:37.680 --> 0:15:41.000
<v Speaker 2>was like a guilt and shame sort of legalistic approach,

0:15:41.440 --> 0:15:45.960
<v Speaker 2>which is, you know, distasteful and not really difficult. We're

0:15:45.960 --> 0:15:48.840
<v Speaker 2>supposed to be compelled by love and grace, not guilt

0:15:48.880 --> 0:15:49.240
<v Speaker 2>and shame.

0:15:49.840 --> 0:15:52.080
<v Speaker 4>So take that as you will. But one thing that

0:15:52.200 --> 0:15:54.920
<v Speaker 4>really struck me was that he decided to label his

0:15:55.000 --> 0:15:59.000
<v Speaker 4>funders e SG. When I thought about it, it made

0:15:59.040 --> 0:16:03.600
<v Speaker 4>sense in some ways. I mean, Inspire certainly screens companies

0:16:03.640 --> 0:16:07.360
<v Speaker 4>by a variety of categories that fall under E S

0:16:07.440 --> 0:16:11.640
<v Speaker 4>and G topics, which is environmental, social and governance issues.

0:16:12.240 --> 0:16:17.440
<v Speaker 4>Inspire will screen for human rights violations, forced labor and

0:16:17.480 --> 0:16:21.720
<v Speaker 4>other worker issues like minimum wage policies. It'll look at

0:16:21.720 --> 0:16:25.040
<v Speaker 4>whether companies are cognizant of their environmental impacts such as

0:16:25.160 --> 0:16:29.520
<v Speaker 4>water consumption and air pollution, and INSPIRE will screen for

0:16:29.640 --> 0:16:34.720
<v Speaker 4>discriminatory or prejectory lending, whether companies are aggressively marketing products

0:16:34.720 --> 0:16:38.960
<v Speaker 4>in low income communities. All of those are considered issue factors.

0:16:39.600 --> 0:16:42.320
<v Speaker 4>But the day I visited him last August, that was

0:16:42.360 --> 0:16:46.280
<v Speaker 4>all about to change. Right before our interview, he was

0:16:46.320 --> 0:16:48.880
<v Speaker 4>in a meeting with his board and they decided to

0:16:48.960 --> 0:16:51.320
<v Speaker 4>remove the E issue label from their funds.

0:16:51.640 --> 0:16:53.440
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if there was some meeting that they

0:16:53.440 --> 0:16:56.600
<v Speaker 2>had in conservative radio land or something, right, but like, hey,

0:16:56.680 --> 0:16:58.160
<v Speaker 2>this year, let's talk about USU every.

0:16:58.000 --> 0:17:01.160
<v Speaker 3>Single time we go on here. So the you know,

0:17:01.280 --> 0:17:04.000
<v Speaker 3>just we noticed the rhetoric is like increasing. Hmm. Watching this,

0:17:04.160 --> 0:17:05.159
<v Speaker 3>I don't know how that's going to go.

0:17:05.440 --> 0:17:07.080
<v Speaker 2>We're committed to like trying to be alive, trying to

0:17:07.080 --> 0:17:10.840
<v Speaker 2>be redemptant influence on ESG, and meanwhile we're getting like

0:17:10.960 --> 0:17:13.000
<v Speaker 2>lambassad from the left for like staying reesg.

0:17:13.720 --> 0:17:16.880
<v Speaker 4>Roberts says he got blowback from liberal corners for claiming

0:17:16.920 --> 0:17:20.320
<v Speaker 4>the ESG label while investing in socks that might contradict

0:17:20.359 --> 0:17:25.199
<v Speaker 4>a more traditional understanding of what ESG means. Meanwhile, his

0:17:25.320 --> 0:17:28.479
<v Speaker 4>more conservative clients were also getting confused by the label.

0:17:29.320 --> 0:17:33.000
<v Speaker 4>Conservative talking heads like Glenn Beck and Tucker Carson had

0:17:33.040 --> 0:17:36.760
<v Speaker 4>been attacking ESG on air, describing it as what they

0:17:36.840 --> 0:17:42.000
<v Speaker 4>call a leftist agenda. So have high profile politicians such

0:17:42.000 --> 0:17:46.040
<v Speaker 4>as Florida Governor Ron de Santis and former Vice President

0:17:46.160 --> 0:17:50.520
<v Speaker 4>Mike Pence. Beck has said ESG poses a danger to

0:17:50.680 --> 0:17:54.480
<v Speaker 4>soul of America. DeSantis has gone as far as directing

0:17:54.520 --> 0:17:56.840
<v Speaker 4>his state to pull billions of dollars from black Rock,

0:17:57.280 --> 0:17:59.800
<v Speaker 4>the Wall Street money manager that's been the most vocal

0:18:00.240 --> 0:18:04.000
<v Speaker 4>about pressing companies on issues like climate change, and more

0:18:04.040 --> 0:18:09.080
<v Speaker 4>than a dozen states have pushed anti ESG laws. So,

0:18:09.160 --> 0:18:13.080
<v Speaker 4>if all these guys are calling ESG woke capitalism, what

0:18:13.119 --> 0:18:16.960
<v Speaker 4>was inspired doing? Robert says he wishes es SHE could

0:18:16.960 --> 0:18:19.640
<v Speaker 4>be seen as more neutral, But it is what it is.

0:18:20.280 --> 0:18:24.639
<v Speaker 2>It's a narrative that we are powerless to counteract. If

0:18:24.640 --> 0:18:28.320
<v Speaker 2>we had a bigger microphone than maybe we would try.

0:18:27.760 --> 0:18:33.640
<v Speaker 2>But the amount, Yeah, like when every conservative pundit is

0:18:34.000 --> 0:18:36.040
<v Speaker 2>calling an evil, like, we just cannot.

0:18:36.440 --> 0:18:37.359
<v Speaker 3>Counteract that narrative.

0:18:37.960 --> 0:18:42.000
<v Speaker 4>Not that Robert necessary wants to counteract conservative talking points.

0:18:42.480 --> 0:18:45.000
<v Speaker 4>He is on the conservative end of the spectrum, after all,

0:18:45.880 --> 0:18:48.880
<v Speaker 4>and he shared the stage at conservative conferences with big

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:53.240
<v Speaker 4>names from the Republican Party. He says he won't endorse candidates,

0:18:53.840 --> 0:18:56.600
<v Speaker 4>but his work naturally leads him to back or speak

0:18:56.640 --> 0:18:59.960
<v Speaker 4>as against companies based on whether they're handling of socially

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:02.320
<v Speaker 4>shoes conforms to his reading of the Bible.

0:19:02.840 --> 0:19:07.439
<v Speaker 2>We believe that a healthy business respects all viewpoints, right,

0:19:07.480 --> 0:19:09.800
<v Speaker 2>and they certainly they claim to be tolerant and inclusive,

0:19:10.119 --> 0:19:12.680
<v Speaker 2>then they should actually be so in practice.

0:19:13.760 --> 0:19:16.280
<v Speaker 3>So do you want them neutral or do you want

0:19:16.320 --> 0:19:18.199
<v Speaker 3>them to keep kends what you mean by neutral? Right,

0:19:18.240 --> 0:19:21.520
<v Speaker 3>So it means neutral by allowing all points.

0:19:21.359 --> 0:19:26.119
<v Speaker 4>Just making shoes, just sit to making cheese.

0:19:28.119 --> 0:19:32.159
<v Speaker 6>If it's Nike, yes I would like him Betral, not

0:19:32.760 --> 0:19:35.720
<v Speaker 6>if it's Bobby Lobby or just like what I'd like

0:19:35.800 --> 0:19:38.280
<v Speaker 6>them to keep not being neutral, you know.

0:19:38.320 --> 0:19:40.760
<v Speaker 2>But even those companies they respect new point, diversity and

0:19:40.840 --> 0:19:43.719
<v Speaker 2>all sorts of people working there, so they're not It's

0:19:43.800 --> 0:19:49.320
<v Speaker 2>neutrality in you know, not imposing your beliefs, you know

0:19:49.480 --> 0:19:53.040
<v Speaker 2>upon people working there in a way that is you know,

0:19:53.200 --> 0:19:55.680
<v Speaker 2>heavy handed or whatever else like it's respecting all viewpoints.

0:19:57.240 --> 0:19:59.919
<v Speaker 1>Wow. Wow, I'm sorry to interrupt Segel, but this is

0:20:00.200 --> 0:20:03.320
<v Speaker 1>just so interesting to me. Robert sounds like such a

0:20:03.320 --> 0:20:06.520
<v Speaker 1>likable man, and he has goals of realizing his values

0:20:06.560 --> 0:20:10.919
<v Speaker 1>as an investor and through his portfolio. But I also

0:20:10.960 --> 0:20:13.760
<v Speaker 1>think there's some hypocrisy and contradictions going on here that

0:20:13.800 --> 0:20:19.480
<v Speaker 1>are worth exploring. He's asking companies like Nike, for example,

0:20:19.560 --> 0:20:22.480
<v Speaker 1>to be neutral and to not put values ahead of

0:20:22.520 --> 0:20:25.080
<v Speaker 1>their product line for example, or do not put values

0:20:25.080 --> 0:20:28.240
<v Speaker 1>ahead of their sponsorships. And yet then he's turning around

0:20:28.240 --> 0:20:31.800
<v Speaker 1>and saying Chick fil A or a hobby lobby is

0:20:31.880 --> 0:20:34.920
<v Speaker 1>doing the right thing by restricting certain people from its

0:20:34.960 --> 0:20:39.240
<v Speaker 1>premises or from its product line. And that just feels

0:20:39.280 --> 0:20:43.200
<v Speaker 1>to me like a deep contradiction, especially from someone who

0:20:43.520 --> 0:20:46.760
<v Speaker 1>says they're a Christian if you accept that sort of

0:20:46.840 --> 0:20:50.680
<v Speaker 1>a basic tenet of Christianity is love and forgiveness. Who

0:20:50.760 --> 0:20:53.800
<v Speaker 1>is he really forgiving? Who does he really love when

0:20:53.840 --> 0:20:57.400
<v Speaker 1>he's working through where he's going to invest? And then

0:20:57.440 --> 0:21:01.480
<v Speaker 1>the criticisms he has of other people for making exactly

0:21:01.520 --> 0:21:02.880
<v Speaker 1>the same choice as he does.

0:21:03.400 --> 0:21:05.560
<v Speaker 4>Well, that's where it gets all murky. A lot of

0:21:05.600 --> 0:21:09.720
<v Speaker 4>conservatives feel that corporate America has been co opted by

0:21:09.760 --> 0:21:13.560
<v Speaker 4>liberals who are pushing goals like climate change, for instance.

0:21:14.280 --> 0:21:18.639
<v Speaker 4>These conservatives want businesses to focus on business and to

0:21:18.760 --> 0:21:22.560
<v Speaker 4>be more neutral and not following liberal goals.

0:21:23.080 --> 0:21:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but neutrality is in the eye of the beholder,

0:21:25.359 --> 0:21:28.399
<v Speaker 1>too right, right, too right, and at least classically with investment,

0:21:28.440 --> 0:21:30.160
<v Speaker 1>if you're saying you're being neutral, you're trying to look

0:21:30.280 --> 0:21:32.920
<v Speaker 1>just at the numbers. And now you have these conflicts

0:21:32.920 --> 0:21:34.639
<v Speaker 1>between people who say, we have the numbers, but we

0:21:34.680 --> 0:21:38.040
<v Speaker 1>also have values. But then you have Robert Ntsley who's saying,

0:21:38.040 --> 0:21:40.520
<v Speaker 1>my values are good for me, but your values aren't

0:21:40.520 --> 0:21:41.040
<v Speaker 1>good for you.

0:21:42.000 --> 0:21:43.919
<v Speaker 4>Maybe this is a good place to pause on the story.

0:21:44.400 --> 0:21:47.560
<v Speaker 1>I agree. Let's take a break, and then where are

0:21:47.560 --> 0:21:48.720
<v Speaker 1>we going When we get back.

0:21:49.280 --> 0:21:50.960
<v Speaker 4>I want to step back and talk to some of

0:21:50.960 --> 0:21:53.480
<v Speaker 4>the experts I've been speaking to about what's going on

0:21:53.560 --> 0:21:56.199
<v Speaker 4>in the issue space, and then we'll go back to

0:21:56.440 --> 0:21:58.040
<v Speaker 4>roberts and here's some of his sorts.

0:21:58.640 --> 0:22:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Great, we'll be right back with all of that. Okay,

0:22:06.560 --> 0:22:09.680
<v Speaker 1>we're back with Bloomberg's ESG reporter Segel Kishan.

0:22:09.960 --> 0:22:10.840
<v Speaker 4>Thanks for having me.

0:22:11.240 --> 0:22:13.600
<v Speaker 1>So we've just heard the story of Robert Netsley, a

0:22:13.680 --> 0:22:16.879
<v Speaker 1>faith based investor in Idaho. But he's not the first

0:22:16.880 --> 0:22:20.520
<v Speaker 1>person obviously who's invested this way. So Sagel, why don't

0:22:20.560 --> 0:22:23.000
<v Speaker 1>you take over the story again and give our listeners

0:22:23.000 --> 0:22:23.760
<v Speaker 1>some of that history.

0:22:24.320 --> 0:22:28.520
<v Speaker 4>Faith based investing is the oldest full of sag Old capitalism.

0:22:28.720 --> 0:22:30.640
<v Speaker 3>Sure, I mean going back to you know, slave trade

0:22:30.680 --> 0:22:31.080
<v Speaker 3>in the UK.

0:22:31.880 --> 0:22:33.359
<v Speaker 4>This is Robert Netsley again.

0:22:33.920 --> 0:22:36.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you had the Quakers and others who just refused

0:22:36.640 --> 0:22:41.359
<v Speaker 2>to invest in the slave trade. And we're outspoken about

0:22:41.400 --> 0:22:44.199
<v Speaker 2>slave trade. So it was people of faith, specifically Christian

0:22:44.200 --> 0:22:48.879
<v Speaker 2>faith in that context, and scripturally, like even thousands of

0:22:48.920 --> 0:22:53.680
<v Speaker 2>years before that, you've got proverbs and rules surrounding commerce

0:22:54.280 --> 0:22:59.439
<v Speaker 2>that prohibit immorality, like including the slave trade. You know,

0:23:00.160 --> 0:23:03.600
<v Speaker 2>kidnop exhilivating in Moses. This is an a moral business.

0:23:03.600 --> 0:23:06.240
<v Speaker 3>You don't steal people and sol THEO.

0:23:07.400 --> 0:23:11.320
<v Speaker 4>I called Nikita Singal to learn more about this. She's

0:23:11.359 --> 0:23:15.040
<v Speaker 4>the co head of Sustainable Investment and ESG at Lizard

0:23:15.160 --> 0:23:16.640
<v Speaker 4>Asset Management in New York.

0:23:17.440 --> 0:23:21.280
<v Speaker 8>Esg's birthplace was kind of from the Sri movement.

0:23:21.680 --> 0:23:26.760
<v Speaker 4>SRI that's socially responsible investing. She pointed to religious groups

0:23:26.800 --> 0:23:29.240
<v Speaker 4>like the Methodists as well. As sharer law in the

0:23:29.280 --> 0:23:30.240
<v Speaker 4>Muslim faith.

0:23:30.400 --> 0:23:34.040
<v Speaker 8>And many other religions have some form of influence over

0:23:34.160 --> 0:23:37.080
<v Speaker 8>how the followers of that faith should invest in line

0:23:37.080 --> 0:23:38.680
<v Speaker 8>with the principles of that religion.

0:23:39.240 --> 0:23:41.720
<v Speaker 4>When hot butts in is shoes later arose around the

0:23:41.800 --> 0:23:45.119
<v Speaker 4>Vietnam War and Apartheis in South Africa, a lot of

0:23:45.160 --> 0:23:49.439
<v Speaker 4>consumers started using their purchasing power to boycott companies turning

0:23:49.440 --> 0:23:50.120
<v Speaker 4>a profit there.

0:23:50.560 --> 0:23:53.680
<v Speaker 8>All of that time period was about investing in companies

0:23:53.720 --> 0:23:56.679
<v Speaker 8>that were we believed they were engaging in activities that

0:23:56.720 --> 0:23:59.399
<v Speaker 8>were not positive for society, and the tool that was

0:23:59.480 --> 0:24:02.520
<v Speaker 8>used was to just simply exclude investing in those companies

0:24:02.560 --> 0:24:06.600
<v Speaker 8>because it was signaling a specific value or a virtue.

0:24:06.960 --> 0:24:09.479
<v Speaker 8>I think ESG is very different from all of that.

0:24:10.200 --> 0:24:12.960
<v Speaker 4>In the Keysa's eyes as a person who does this

0:24:13.080 --> 0:24:14.280
<v Speaker 4>kind of investing every day.

0:24:15.320 --> 0:24:20.600
<v Speaker 8>ESG is not virtue signaling. It's not a product, it's

0:24:20.640 --> 0:24:23.920
<v Speaker 8>a process. It's actually part and parcel and a very

0:24:24.040 --> 0:24:27.240
<v Speaker 8>essential part of good investing. And what it is about

0:24:27.400 --> 0:24:30.480
<v Speaker 8>is thinking on behalf of our clients as their fiduciaries.

0:24:30.960 --> 0:24:34.159
<v Speaker 8>What are these emerging risks and opportunities related to the

0:24:34.280 --> 0:24:38.320
<v Speaker 8>environment and society that are increasingly becoming market issues.

0:24:39.000 --> 0:24:43.000
<v Speaker 4>When I told Nikisa about Robert's fund, she was unequivocal.

0:24:43.280 --> 0:24:45.120
<v Speaker 8>I would not consider that ESG.

0:24:46.000 --> 0:24:48.760
<v Speaker 4>She highlights it for me, the difference between ESG and

0:24:48.840 --> 0:24:53.200
<v Speaker 4>what she calls impacts investing. That's where an investor might

0:24:53.240 --> 0:24:56.600
<v Speaker 4>try to use their investments to affect change or influence

0:24:56.640 --> 0:24:57.840
<v Speaker 4>a company's policies.

0:24:58.359 --> 0:25:00.600
<v Speaker 8>There is a healthy and growing subst set of our

0:25:00.640 --> 0:25:02.639
<v Speaker 8>clients who are interested in that, and we need to

0:25:02.640 --> 0:25:05.000
<v Speaker 8>make sure that we can do it while keeping in

0:25:05.040 --> 0:25:08.280
<v Speaker 8>mind their risk return objectives. But it's not the place

0:25:08.320 --> 0:25:10.680
<v Speaker 8>of a global asset manager like us to be able

0:25:10.720 --> 0:25:11.920
<v Speaker 8>to have an opinion on that.

0:25:12.680 --> 0:25:16.280
<v Speaker 4>To learn more about what makes EESG ESG, I called

0:25:16.280 --> 0:25:18.840
<v Speaker 4>an expert who I've spoken to you while on the beat.

0:25:19.160 --> 0:25:22.240
<v Speaker 5>VET told Hennish and I'm Weistein and faculty director of

0:25:22.280 --> 0:25:24.720
<v Speaker 5>the ESG Initiative at the Wharton School, and I'm also

0:25:24.760 --> 0:25:26.680
<v Speaker 5>the Deloitte and Tusche Professor of Management.

0:25:27.119 --> 0:25:30.320
<v Speaker 4>Viz has a similaritate to Nikisa when it comes to

0:25:30.359 --> 0:25:33.000
<v Speaker 4>what factors go into an ESG investment plan.

0:25:33.520 --> 0:25:36.760
<v Speaker 5>ESG is about doing hard financial analysis and it's not

0:25:36.880 --> 0:25:41.800
<v Speaker 5>at all driven by ideology. It's driven by economics.

0:25:44.119 --> 0:25:47.720
<v Speaker 4>He'll study data to try to understand how companies are

0:25:47.720 --> 0:25:53.120
<v Speaker 4>analyzing environmental, social, and governance factors. Then he'll look into

0:25:53.160 --> 0:25:57.720
<v Speaker 4>how those factors might affect a company's bottom line. Here's

0:25:57.760 --> 0:26:02.440
<v Speaker 4>an example. Palmle is a common ingredient found in cosmetic

0:26:02.480 --> 0:26:05.960
<v Speaker 4>products like lipsticks, but it's also leading to a lot

0:26:05.960 --> 0:26:07.760
<v Speaker 4>of deforestation around the world.

0:26:08.240 --> 0:26:11.200
<v Speaker 5>That's just one of many examples. Or an agricultural company

0:26:11.400 --> 0:26:15.119
<v Speaker 5>by changing its mix of supplies, by changing where and

0:26:15.160 --> 0:26:18.840
<v Speaker 5>how it's sourcing, can have an impact on deforestation and

0:26:18.960 --> 0:26:22.920
<v Speaker 5>an impact on clear cutting and other environmentally damaging practices.

0:26:23.520 --> 0:26:27.520
<v Speaker 5>Companies are going to be increasingly pressured to undertake those actions.

0:26:27.880 --> 0:26:31.200
<v Speaker 5>Some companies are head in that transition. Some companies are behind.

0:26:31.600 --> 0:26:35.800
<v Speaker 5>That should be reflected in their valuation. Otherwise, government policy

0:26:36.119 --> 0:26:40.240
<v Speaker 5>or consumer changes in preferences will lead them to be

0:26:40.359 --> 0:26:42.800
<v Speaker 5>forced to make these changes later on when they're more

0:26:42.840 --> 0:26:43.640
<v Speaker 5>expensive to make.

0:26:44.200 --> 0:26:47.080
<v Speaker 4>It's not a short term gain. He's really trying to

0:26:47.080 --> 0:26:50.760
<v Speaker 4>map out how a company's decisions today will affect its

0:26:50.800 --> 0:26:51.800
<v Speaker 4>profits in the future.

0:26:52.160 --> 0:26:54.679
<v Speaker 5>There may be periods of time like twenty twenty two,

0:26:54.840 --> 0:26:57.960
<v Speaker 5>where you outperform the market, but you will underperform over

0:26:57.960 --> 0:26:59.840
<v Speaker 5>the medium to long term.

0:27:00.200 --> 0:27:03.680
<v Speaker 4>Of industry groups report that trillions of dollars are already

0:27:03.760 --> 0:27:08.240
<v Speaker 4>weighing ESG issues to some degree. That's a massive pool

0:27:08.240 --> 0:27:11.840
<v Speaker 4>of capital, and Fitz says it's only going to get bigger.

0:27:12.359 --> 0:27:16.720
<v Speaker 4>But the southern political polarization of ESG worries him. Sure,

0:27:17.160 --> 0:27:20.480
<v Speaker 4>ESU models need work, but he doesn't think that's a

0:27:20.560 --> 0:27:23.720
<v Speaker 4>reason to give up on the strategy or ignore how

0:27:23.800 --> 0:27:25.800
<v Speaker 4>these factors affect the market.

0:27:26.200 --> 0:27:29.320
<v Speaker 5>What I'd point to is the unfair standard they're holding

0:27:29.320 --> 0:27:33.240
<v Speaker 5>the ESG movement to. They say, we haven't built the

0:27:33.320 --> 0:27:36.520
<v Speaker 5>data set yet that can predict future stock market returns,

0:27:36.680 --> 0:27:39.480
<v Speaker 5>that we haven't built the financial model that can predict

0:27:39.760 --> 0:27:42.800
<v Speaker 5>which stock will outperform the others over the next ten years.

0:27:43.440 --> 0:27:46.879
<v Speaker 5>Show me anyone in the financial service space who has

0:27:46.920 --> 0:27:49.800
<v Speaker 5>a data set that can predict which stocks are going

0:27:49.840 --> 0:27:54.119
<v Speaker 5>to outperform the others over the next ten years. Anyone

0:27:54.119 --> 0:27:56.560
<v Speaker 5>who had such a data set would be a billionaire.

0:27:57.119 --> 0:28:00.760
<v Speaker 5>There's a struggle to always, in each market cycle, in

0:28:00.800 --> 0:28:03.439
<v Speaker 5>each month, try to figure out which stocks are going

0:28:03.480 --> 0:28:06.000
<v Speaker 5>to outperform and which art There's.

0:28:05.800 --> 0:28:09.000
<v Speaker 4>So much confusion about what ESG is. It means different

0:28:09.000 --> 0:28:13.080
<v Speaker 4>things to different people. The data is incomplete, it's difficult

0:28:13.160 --> 0:28:16.000
<v Speaker 4>to compare, and overall the field is still a work

0:28:16.000 --> 0:28:20.199
<v Speaker 4>in progress, and even experts acknowledge that ESG analysis is

0:28:20.200 --> 0:28:23.560
<v Speaker 4>still in its infancy. Nikisa says people just have to

0:28:23.600 --> 0:28:25.239
<v Speaker 4>appreciate where the industry is.

0:28:25.840 --> 0:28:28.080
<v Speaker 8>That's the wild wild West that we're still in.

0:28:28.840 --> 0:28:32.000
<v Speaker 4>Nikita also says she doesn't see bias at work in

0:28:32.240 --> 0:28:36.040
<v Speaker 4>ESG analysis. Regardless of how the models are built.

0:28:36.080 --> 0:28:39.080
<v Speaker 8>There is no such thing as a good ESG company

0:28:39.440 --> 0:28:42.600
<v Speaker 8>or a bad ESG company, because you're throwing in three

0:28:42.760 --> 0:28:45.920
<v Speaker 8>very different variables and you're somehow assuming that that is

0:28:46.000 --> 0:28:48.640
<v Speaker 8>going to make some sense. Our job as an investor

0:28:48.680 --> 0:28:51.560
<v Speaker 8>is not to say whether that's good or bad for society.

0:28:51.680 --> 0:28:54.800
<v Speaker 8>It's about saying how does that impact the financial markets.

0:28:55.440 --> 0:28:59.880
<v Speaker 4>Roberts agrees with Nikisa and fits that ESH shouldn't be prescriptive,

0:29:00.480 --> 0:29:02.920
<v Speaker 4>but he thinks that's actually what's happening.

0:29:03.480 --> 0:29:06.720
<v Speaker 2>The Pollyanna and me probably wishes that there could be

0:29:06.760 --> 0:29:08.920
<v Speaker 2>a two part of UHG system.

0:29:08.440 --> 0:29:11.800
<v Speaker 4>And how would that work. We'll take the E for example.

0:29:12.360 --> 0:29:15.360
<v Speaker 2>There are those who just think mining is bad and

0:29:15.960 --> 0:29:19.720
<v Speaker 2>oil production is literally evil and it's killing mother Earth

0:29:19.920 --> 0:29:23.440
<v Speaker 2>and we should stop all drilling period, no matter what

0:29:23.480 --> 0:29:27.840
<v Speaker 2>the costs. The Bible says that we're here. God has

0:29:27.880 --> 0:29:32.360
<v Speaker 2>put us in his earth to exercise his dominion over

0:29:32.400 --> 0:29:37.080
<v Speaker 2>this world. We have a right to extract things from

0:29:37.120 --> 0:29:38.920
<v Speaker 2>the earth. Right we have a right to use the

0:29:39.000 --> 0:29:41.280
<v Speaker 2>resources to benefit mankind.

0:29:41.720 --> 0:29:44.520
<v Speaker 4>Robert's biblical view of mining lines up with a more

0:29:44.600 --> 0:29:49.360
<v Speaker 4>conservative way of thinking. So the conservative ESG system miight

0:29:49.440 --> 0:29:52.640
<v Speaker 4>grade mining companies highly and invest in more of them,

0:29:53.160 --> 0:29:56.560
<v Speaker 4>whereas a liberal EESG system miight grade them poorly and

0:29:56.600 --> 0:30:02.240
<v Speaker 4>not invest one issue cheaper, and two very different approaches.

0:30:02.720 --> 0:30:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Okay, hang on a second, I'm going to butt in

0:30:04.600 --> 0:30:08.680
<v Speaker 1>here again to clarify. Nikita and Vitt are saying that

0:30:09.040 --> 0:30:13.520
<v Speaker 1>ESG is not political and it's not partisan. They say

0:30:13.520 --> 0:30:15.560
<v Speaker 1>they're just looking at data that shows how a company

0:30:15.560 --> 0:30:19.680
<v Speaker 1>will perform in the future depending on how they handle environmental, social,

0:30:20.000 --> 0:30:23.760
<v Speaker 1>and governance factors. But some conservatives think that issues like

0:30:23.840 --> 0:30:28.160
<v Speaker 1>climate change, for instance, are inherently political, even if the

0:30:28.240 --> 0:30:31.960
<v Speaker 1>vast majority of scientists agree that climate change is real.

0:30:32.640 --> 0:30:35.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's a pretty good summary, tim, And actually there

0:30:35.680 --> 0:30:38.360
<v Speaker 4>may be even more approaches to issue than what I've

0:30:38.440 --> 0:30:41.840
<v Speaker 4>laid out. I spoke to another faith based investor Mark

0:30:41.880 --> 0:30:45.360
<v Speaker 4>Regier who works in Wisconsin, and he has a different

0:30:45.400 --> 0:30:47.000
<v Speaker 4>reading of the Bible than Robert does.

0:30:47.560 --> 0:30:50.000
<v Speaker 5>I make it a rule not to tell anybody what

0:30:50.160 --> 0:30:52.400
<v Speaker 5>Jesus would do, because I don't know.

0:30:52.840 --> 0:30:55.520
<v Speaker 2>That's what makes the difference between somebody who's the son

0:30:55.560 --> 0:30:57.240
<v Speaker 2>of God and somebody who's definitely not.

0:30:59.160 --> 0:31:02.040
<v Speaker 4>Like I said, there's no clear definition of ESG. There's

0:31:02.080 --> 0:31:04.560
<v Speaker 4>lots of different takes on it. It depends on who

0:31:04.560 --> 0:31:05.120
<v Speaker 4>you speak with.

0:31:06.080 --> 0:31:08.840
<v Speaker 1>What a minefield. I want to talk more about this,

0:31:08.960 --> 0:31:11.400
<v Speaker 1>but we have to take an ad break first. We'll

0:31:11.400 --> 0:31:21.120
<v Speaker 1>be right back. Okay, we're back with Sagel Kishan, the

0:31:21.480 --> 0:31:25.120
<v Speaker 1>ESG wizard of Bloomberg News. I've found this whole story

0:31:25.160 --> 0:31:29.600
<v Speaker 1>so fascinating, Sagel, and a lot's gone on since you

0:31:29.760 --> 0:31:32.680
<v Speaker 1>interviewed Robert the last time. Tell me about some of

0:31:32.680 --> 0:31:35.320
<v Speaker 1>the most significant things that have happened within the ESG

0:31:35.480 --> 0:31:36.600
<v Speaker 1>movement during that period.

0:31:37.200 --> 0:31:41.080
<v Speaker 4>Gosh, so much has happens. We've had Ronda Santis Pylon

0:31:41.440 --> 0:31:45.520
<v Speaker 4>An attack EESG. We've had attorney generals across different states

0:31:45.920 --> 0:31:50.680
<v Speaker 4>launch investigations into ESG. We've had billions of dollars pulled

0:31:50.720 --> 0:31:53.880
<v Speaker 4>out of black Rock, Wall Street's biggest champion of ESG

0:31:54.840 --> 0:31:58.000
<v Speaker 4>and plenty of anti ESCH bills being pushed through states.

0:31:58.720 --> 0:32:01.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's very interesting to me when these things

0:32:01.120 --> 0:32:04.880
<v Speaker 1>happen in the US, where a momentum comes behind a movement,

0:32:04.920 --> 0:32:07.280
<v Speaker 1>whatever the movement might be. We saw this happening with

0:32:07.360 --> 0:32:12.680
<v Speaker 1>another acronym CRT or critical race theory that invaded the

0:32:12.800 --> 0:32:16.120
<v Speaker 1>discussion of education and what's appropriate for the classroom and

0:32:16.160 --> 0:32:19.560
<v Speaker 1>what isn't it's rare that you get that same phenomenon

0:32:19.600 --> 0:32:23.200
<v Speaker 1>on Wall Street and that it becomes so clearly politicized

0:32:23.600 --> 0:32:25.600
<v Speaker 1>so quickly, And what do you think gave it this

0:32:25.680 --> 0:32:28.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of energy? Like why now? And why has it

0:32:28.680 --> 0:32:29.560
<v Speaker 1>gotten such traction?

0:32:30.440 --> 0:32:33.080
<v Speaker 4>Why now? I mean, the E issue movement, if you

0:32:33.120 --> 0:32:37.080
<v Speaker 4>can call it a movement, has overtaken in some ways

0:32:37.240 --> 0:32:40.520
<v Speaker 4>asset managers and banks. Everybody's been pushing to look at

0:32:40.520 --> 0:32:46.040
<v Speaker 4>things like climate change, c suite diversity, inequalities.

0:32:45.360 --> 0:32:47.960
<v Speaker 1>The composition of boards exactly exactly.

0:32:48.400 --> 0:32:51.200
<v Speaker 4>And so that's why we've had this big pushback because

0:32:51.280 --> 0:32:53.320
<v Speaker 4>Wall Street has gone big on this in the last

0:32:53.360 --> 0:32:54.240
<v Speaker 4>three years.

0:32:54.080 --> 0:32:57.480
<v Speaker 1>And is that pure lunacy. Has Wall Street gone off

0:32:57.480 --> 0:33:01.160
<v Speaker 1>its rocker that it's now actually trying to embrace things

0:33:01.280 --> 0:33:07.000
<v Speaker 1>like climate change, or corporate diversity or boardroom diversity. I mean,

0:33:07.040 --> 0:33:10.760
<v Speaker 1>clearly its critics think it has and they're painting it

0:33:10.800 --> 0:33:13.920
<v Speaker 1>as dangerous, but just trying to step back for our

0:33:13.960 --> 0:33:16.920
<v Speaker 1>listeners a little bit. As someone who watches Wall Street

0:33:17.000 --> 0:33:21.520
<v Speaker 1>as a sophisticated observer, as a very numerous, sophisticated observer,

0:33:22.320 --> 0:33:25.520
<v Speaker 1>do you think this is a threat to the foundations

0:33:25.720 --> 0:33:28.400
<v Speaker 1>of American finance and the roots of Wall Street.

0:33:28.920 --> 0:33:33.320
<v Speaker 4>It's funny that you say that, because progressives who are

0:33:33.800 --> 0:33:36.400
<v Speaker 4>trying to push and act on things like climate change

0:33:36.440 --> 0:33:40.800
<v Speaker 4>and inequalities in society, they don't feel that capital markets

0:33:41.280 --> 0:33:44.920
<v Speaker 4>corporations are doing enough. In fact, they think it's something

0:33:44.920 --> 0:33:48.840
<v Speaker 4>called greenwashing, where a company saying they're doing good things,

0:33:49.080 --> 0:33:52.719
<v Speaker 4>but really they're not. So it's been pushed and pulled

0:33:52.760 --> 0:33:54.440
<v Speaker 4>from both sides at the moment.

0:33:54.520 --> 0:33:56.200
<v Speaker 1>And that critique from the left is you actually are

0:33:56.200 --> 0:33:58.440
<v Speaker 1>not putting your money where your mouth is, exactly, and

0:33:58.480 --> 0:34:00.840
<v Speaker 1>now you have Wall Street step being up or at

0:34:00.880 --> 0:34:03.080
<v Speaker 1>least attempting to to put its money where its mouth is.

0:34:03.520 --> 0:34:06.000
<v Speaker 1>The left says it's not enough money, and the right

0:34:06.040 --> 0:34:10.680
<v Speaker 1>saying watch your mouth. And caught in the middle are

0:34:10.800 --> 0:34:15.360
<v Speaker 1>essentially money managers trying to figure out both profitable ways

0:34:15.400 --> 0:34:19.839
<v Speaker 1>to invest and socially responsible ways to invest in hence

0:34:19.880 --> 0:34:21.000
<v Speaker 1>a firestorm.

0:34:21.520 --> 0:34:23.640
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely, by the end of the day, Wall Street is

0:34:23.680 --> 0:34:27.120
<v Speaker 4>about making money. They're doing this to generate fees, to

0:34:27.200 --> 0:34:31.600
<v Speaker 4>generate revenue, but the antiesh backlash is actually now sent

0:34:31.719 --> 0:34:34.839
<v Speaker 4>a chill down Wall Street's spine. We've seen a lot

0:34:34.960 --> 0:34:38.479
<v Speaker 4>of banks, a lot of investors who two years ago

0:34:38.880 --> 0:34:42.759
<v Speaker 4>would wax lyrical about climate change and sea suit diversity.

0:34:43.520 --> 0:34:45.120
<v Speaker 4>Now they've gone on the down load.

0:34:45.480 --> 0:34:48.879
<v Speaker 1>And is that because they see reputational risk baked into

0:34:48.920 --> 0:34:50.600
<v Speaker 1>that that at the end of the day they're saying

0:34:50.600 --> 0:34:54.080
<v Speaker 1>to themselves it might be socially responsible, we even might

0:34:54.120 --> 0:34:58.640
<v Speaker 1>make money off of this, but this sort of firestorm

0:34:58.680 --> 0:35:01.399
<v Speaker 1>of criticism we're getting doesn't make it worth it, because

0:35:01.400 --> 0:35:02.960
<v Speaker 1>we might lose business in the long run.

0:35:03.239 --> 0:35:06.439
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely, I mean Larry Think, the chief of Black Rock,

0:35:06.920 --> 0:35:10.840
<v Speaker 4>he's really been attacked in many ways by the Republicans.

0:35:10.600 --> 0:35:12.120
<v Speaker 1>And deeply personally attacked.

0:35:12.200 --> 0:35:13.920
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely, they've really called him.

0:35:13.760 --> 0:35:16.919
<v Speaker 1>On billboards anti semitism.

0:35:16.520 --> 0:35:20.040
<v Speaker 4>And so he's had to then tone down his rhetoric

0:35:20.080 --> 0:35:22.719
<v Speaker 4>on climate change. And last year he went down to

0:35:22.760 --> 0:35:26.239
<v Speaker 4>Texas to even meet all executives who explain to them

0:35:26.400 --> 0:35:29.760
<v Speaker 4>the energy transition and they need to shift to cleaner fuels.

0:35:30.280 --> 0:35:33.000
<v Speaker 4>But the atacks on him and the company have been

0:35:33.200 --> 0:35:36.080
<v Speaker 4>pretty relentless, and that's why a lot of other companies

0:35:36.120 --> 0:35:38.680
<v Speaker 4>have kind of duck for cover and they're really toning

0:35:38.760 --> 0:35:42.880
<v Speaker 4>down what they're saying about climate change in particular. And

0:35:42.960 --> 0:35:46.440
<v Speaker 4>on top of that, we've had Attorney general's launch investigations

0:35:47.200 --> 0:35:49.760
<v Speaker 4>looking at the legal ease in many of the efforts

0:35:49.760 --> 0:35:51.360
<v Speaker 4>that Wall Street are doing when it comes to the

0:35:51.440 --> 0:35:56.080
<v Speaker 4>energy transition. So yeah, everybody's really looking at their marketing documents,

0:35:56.120 --> 0:35:58.520
<v Speaker 4>their pitch books, making sure that they have all their

0:35:58.600 --> 0:35:59.239
<v Speaker 4>ducks lined up.

0:35:59.800 --> 0:36:02.840
<v Speaker 1>I guess so as we both know, no one really

0:36:02.880 --> 0:36:04.960
<v Speaker 1>has all their ducks lined up, no matter what they're doing,

0:36:04.960 --> 0:36:09.800
<v Speaker 1>whether they're investor, a corporate manager, a parent, or a teacher.

0:36:10.239 --> 0:36:12.160
<v Speaker 1>I think one of the things I wonder about in

0:36:12.200 --> 0:36:15.279
<v Speaker 1>all this is if there is a consensus, a scientific

0:36:15.320 --> 0:36:18.759
<v Speaker 1>consensus that climate change might be a problem. I think

0:36:18.760 --> 0:36:22.520
<v Speaker 1>there's definitely a social consensus that people should not be

0:36:22.600 --> 0:36:27.080
<v Speaker 1>discriminated against for leadership positions in politics or in corporate

0:36:27.120 --> 0:36:30.279
<v Speaker 1>America simply because they're a woman, or because they're a

0:36:30.280 --> 0:36:34.000
<v Speaker 1>person of color or have a different ethnic background. If

0:36:34.040 --> 0:36:38.760
<v Speaker 1>we're forestalling putting money behind these kinds of efforts based

0:36:38.800 --> 0:36:43.120
<v Speaker 1>on bad information and it runs against both scientific information

0:36:43.520 --> 0:36:46.760
<v Speaker 1>and broadly held social values, we're getting into a pretty

0:36:46.760 --> 0:36:49.440
<v Speaker 1>problematic place, aren't we, in terms of being able to

0:36:49.880 --> 0:36:52.520
<v Speaker 1>take the necessary action we need to solve problems.

0:36:52.600 --> 0:36:52.680
<v Speaker 2>No.

0:36:52.800 --> 0:36:55.560
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely, But to people on the right, a lot of

0:36:55.600 --> 0:37:01.880
<v Speaker 4>diversity initiatives smacks of affirmative action of quote, and historically

0:37:01.920 --> 0:37:03.000
<v Speaker 4>they've hated all of that.

0:37:03.680 --> 0:37:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I wonder how many of those people on the

0:37:05.080 --> 0:37:08.520
<v Speaker 1>right come from lots of different countries historically and have

0:37:08.640 --> 0:37:11.399
<v Speaker 1>lots of different backgrounds, and now they kind of want

0:37:11.480 --> 0:37:14.000
<v Speaker 1>just one thing. But that's probably for a different podcast.

0:37:14.280 --> 0:37:17.120
<v Speaker 1>I want to come back to money in ESG here.

0:37:17.320 --> 0:37:20.800
<v Speaker 1>I also think it's useful to frame exactly how vast

0:37:21.000 --> 0:37:25.319
<v Speaker 1>the ESG realm is, because most money invested in Wall

0:37:25.320 --> 0:37:28.919
<v Speaker 1>Street is still invested the old fashioned way. People try

0:37:28.960 --> 0:37:34.120
<v Speaker 1>to find either growth opportunities or undervalued companies and create

0:37:34.160 --> 0:37:37.760
<v Speaker 1>a calculus that will result in a profitable payoff somewhere

0:37:37.800 --> 0:37:42.360
<v Speaker 1>down the road. How big actually is the ESG universe

0:37:42.440 --> 0:37:45.360
<v Speaker 1>right now in terms of what percentage of assets on

0:37:45.400 --> 0:37:46.719
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street flow towards it.

0:37:47.120 --> 0:37:49.759
<v Speaker 4>Well, it's certainly not a majority of the assets. It's

0:37:49.760 --> 0:37:52.719
<v Speaker 4>probably less than ten, if not five percent of the assets.

0:37:53.360 --> 0:37:57.480
<v Speaker 4>But ESG investors they have said, like trillions is involved

0:37:57.520 --> 0:38:00.839
<v Speaker 4>in ESG. But what's happening now because of concerns of

0:38:00.920 --> 0:38:05.440
<v Speaker 4>greenwashing when people exaggerate their environmental claims, we're seeing a

0:38:05.480 --> 0:38:09.080
<v Speaker 4>sort of shrinkage going on both in Europe and the US.

0:38:09.480 --> 0:38:11.400
<v Speaker 4>So the numbers are in flux at the moment.

0:38:12.239 --> 0:38:15.400
<v Speaker 1>So from where you sit, do you think this means

0:38:15.400 --> 0:38:17.880
<v Speaker 1>that the SG movement is going to run out of steam?

0:38:18.480 --> 0:38:21.799
<v Speaker 1>Does it die? Does it get repackaged with different initials

0:38:21.840 --> 0:38:23.960
<v Speaker 1>and sort of sneak past its critics? How does this

0:38:24.040 --> 0:38:25.000
<v Speaker 1>play out?

0:38:25.280 --> 0:38:27.400
<v Speaker 4>There are even people within the ESG who want to

0:38:27.440 --> 0:38:29.759
<v Speaker 4>get rid of the acronym altogether because of all the

0:38:29.760 --> 0:38:32.920
<v Speaker 4>bad press in the past year. They're thinking of more

0:38:33.000 --> 0:38:38.480
<v Speaker 4>mundane labels like sustainable investing or de risking or material

0:38:38.600 --> 0:38:41.879
<v Speaker 4>risk factors, which they don't really excite people, but that's

0:38:41.920 --> 0:38:43.080
<v Speaker 4>really what the issue is.

0:38:43.200 --> 0:38:45.279
<v Speaker 1>Maybe they could call it save the planet so your

0:38:45.280 --> 0:38:47.799
<v Speaker 1>grandchildren can still live on it, but that's too long

0:38:47.840 --> 0:38:49.520
<v Speaker 1>for an investment them, isn't it.

0:38:50.320 --> 0:38:54.920
<v Speaker 4>But despite the malaise, we're not really seeing companies or banks,

0:38:55.440 --> 0:38:57.480
<v Speaker 4>even though they're being less vocal about it, they're still

0:38:57.520 --> 0:39:01.600
<v Speaker 4>pushing on behind the scenes on man these initiatives, something

0:39:01.640 --> 0:39:04.920
<v Speaker 4>called green hushing, where you don't talk about your green

0:39:04.960 --> 0:39:08.759
<v Speaker 4>activities but you do it anyway, but you do it anyway. Yeah,

0:39:09.560 --> 0:39:12.160
<v Speaker 4>this backlash isn't going to go away. There's gonna be

0:39:12.160 --> 0:39:14.759
<v Speaker 4>ebbs and flows. But we've got the elections next year.

0:39:15.440 --> 0:39:18.600
<v Speaker 4>We've got some of the candidates riding on anti woke tickets,

0:39:18.840 --> 0:39:22.480
<v Speaker 4>Rando Sentis and another one, Vivek Ramaswami.

0:39:22.600 --> 0:39:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Uh huh yeah.

0:39:23.960 --> 0:39:26.520
<v Speaker 4>So yeah, it's going to continue to be bashed.

0:39:27.080 --> 0:39:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So Joe, I don't let anybody escape this show

0:39:30.200 --> 0:39:34.680
<v Speaker 1>without sharing with our listeners what they've learned, that little

0:39:34.719 --> 0:39:39.040
<v Speaker 1>aha that they've discovered by examining the subject we're talking about. So,

0:39:39.120 --> 0:39:43.520
<v Speaker 1>what have you learned about ESG and the anti ESG

0:39:43.760 --> 0:39:47.680
<v Speaker 1>movement that you didn't know before you began talking to

0:39:47.760 --> 0:39:49.680
<v Speaker 1>Robert Netsley and others.

0:39:50.920 --> 0:39:54.719
<v Speaker 4>I guess maybe this is naive of me. But in Europe,

0:39:55.000 --> 0:39:57.920
<v Speaker 4>in other parts of the world, there isn't this backlash.

0:39:58.040 --> 0:40:01.640
<v Speaker 4>It's only in America where this backlash. So I've been

0:40:01.680 --> 0:40:06.920
<v Speaker 4>surprised by the pushback by the rights on an investment

0:40:06.920 --> 0:40:09.200
<v Speaker 4>strategy that people on the left are saying is not

0:40:09.280 --> 0:40:13.719
<v Speaker 4>really doing much. What I've learned things aren't so black

0:40:13.719 --> 0:40:14.960
<v Speaker 4>and white.

0:40:15.000 --> 0:40:18.240
<v Speaker 1>They never are. Thank you for joining us today.

0:40:18.560 --> 0:40:19.800
<v Speaker 4>Thank you.

0:40:19.800 --> 0:40:23.800
<v Speaker 1>You can find Segel Kishan's reporting on Bloomberg dot com

0:40:23.840 --> 0:40:26.560
<v Speaker 1>and if you want to become a subscriber the Bloomberg

0:40:26.640 --> 0:40:30.319
<v Speaker 1>terminal here at crash Course. We believe the collisions can

0:40:30.360 --> 0:40:35.280
<v Speaker 1>be messy, impressive, challenging, surprising, and always instructive. In today's

0:40:35.280 --> 0:40:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Crash Course, I learned that there are many ways to

0:40:38.600 --> 0:40:41.480
<v Speaker 1>skin the cat when you're talking about what is and

0:40:41.760 --> 0:40:46.040
<v Speaker 1>isn't a value based investment strategy. What did you learn?

0:40:46.640 --> 0:40:48.640
<v Speaker 1>We'd love to hear from you. You can tweet at

0:40:48.640 --> 0:40:52.160
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Opinion handle at Opinion or me at Tim

0:40:52.160 --> 0:40:56.279
<v Speaker 1>O'Brien using the hashtag Bloomberg Crash Course. You can also

0:40:56.320 --> 0:40:59.400
<v Speaker 1>subscribe to our show wherever you're listening right now and

0:40:59.480 --> 0:41:02.080
<v Speaker 1>leave us a room. It helps more people find the show.

0:41:03.040 --> 0:41:07.759
<v Speaker 1>This episode was produced by the indispensable Annamazarakis, Moses on

0:41:07.920 --> 0:41:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Dam and Me. Our supervising producer is Magnus Hendrickson, and

0:41:11.920 --> 0:41:15.799
<v Speaker 1>we had editing help from Sage Bauman, Katie Boyce, Jeff Grocott,

0:41:16.200 --> 0:41:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Mike Nitza and Christine Vanden Bilart. Blake Maples does our

0:41:20.440 --> 0:41:23.640
<v Speaker 1>sound engineering and our original theme song was composed by

0:41:23.719 --> 0:41:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Luis Gara. I'm Tim O'Brien. We'll be back next week

0:41:27.960 --> 0:41:29.080
<v Speaker 1>with another crash course