1 00:00:01,120 --> 00:00:04,840 Speaker 1: Hey, this is Tim. Happy New Year. We're on vacation 2 00:00:04,960 --> 00:00:07,200 Speaker 1: this week, but the Crash Course team wanted to re 3 00:00:07,320 --> 00:00:10,080 Speaker 1: air an episode we had fun making with a colleague 4 00:00:10,119 --> 00:00:13,720 Speaker 1: of ours here at Bloomberg. Sagel Kishan is a stellar 5 00:00:13,760 --> 00:00:16,840 Speaker 1: Bloomberg reporter, and she wrote a really great article about 6 00:00:16,880 --> 00:00:20,520 Speaker 1: the backlash to ESG, which is an investing practice that 7 00:00:20,560 --> 00:00:25,320 Speaker 1: takes environmental, social, and governance concerns into account. We worked 8 00:00:25,320 --> 00:00:27,320 Speaker 1: with her to turn the interview for that story into 9 00:00:27,320 --> 00:00:30,360 Speaker 1: the episode that you're about to hear. Thanks for listening. 10 00:00:30,920 --> 00:00:33,800 Speaker 1: Now here's the show. Have you ever looked at the 11 00:00:33,800 --> 00:00:37,400 Speaker 1: stock market and thought, Dear Lord, my portfolio needs some help, 12 00:00:38,040 --> 00:00:42,479 Speaker 1: or thank God, it's not that bad today. Well, for 13 00:00:42,560 --> 00:00:46,319 Speaker 1: one investor in Idaho, that prayer happens every day, though 14 00:00:46,320 --> 00:00:47,920 Speaker 1: with a little less exasperation. 15 00:00:48,560 --> 00:00:52,320 Speaker 2: Heavenly Father, as we head into our week full of work, 16 00:00:52,320 --> 00:00:54,320 Speaker 2: we pray that you would go with us, that you'd 17 00:00:54,320 --> 00:00:56,040 Speaker 2: be with us, Lord, go before us. 18 00:00:56,520 --> 00:00:56,840 Speaker 3: Thank you. 19 00:00:56,920 --> 00:01:01,000 Speaker 1: That's Robert Netsley, the president and CEO of in Investing. 20 00:01:01,600 --> 00:01:02,959 Speaker 1: His company does something he. 21 00:01:03,000 --> 00:01:05,360 Speaker 2: Calls bysically responsible investing. 22 00:01:05,160 --> 00:01:08,800 Speaker 1: Biblically responsible investing for the uninitiated. 23 00:01:09,120 --> 00:01:12,080 Speaker 2: What doesn't mean to invest the Word of God means 24 00:01:12,440 --> 00:01:14,119 Speaker 2: certainly to do what you can to earn a good 25 00:01:14,120 --> 00:01:17,800 Speaker 2: return and use the returns for redemptive purposes, but also means, 26 00:01:17,880 --> 00:01:22,720 Speaker 2: like Proverbs chapter sixteen says, better is a little with righteousness, 27 00:01:22,720 --> 00:01:25,720 Speaker 2: and great gains with injustice. If there has to be 28 00:01:25,760 --> 00:01:29,280 Speaker 2: a trade off between making a ton of money or 29 00:01:29,720 --> 00:01:36,200 Speaker 2: being moral, like we should choose righteousness, morality, ethics. And 30 00:01:36,280 --> 00:01:38,280 Speaker 2: there's very few people that I think wouldn't disagree with that. 31 00:01:39,240 --> 00:01:42,280 Speaker 1: So Robert invests depending on what he thinks the Bible 32 00:01:42,360 --> 00:01:46,039 Speaker 1: might support or not support. He used to label his 33 00:01:46,120 --> 00:01:49,680 Speaker 1: offerings as faith based ESG in twenty. 34 00:01:49,560 --> 00:01:52,640 Speaker 2: Nineteen, like when the latched WWJD. It's the first fund 35 00:01:52,680 --> 00:01:55,880 Speaker 2: that had ESG in the name. What would you Do WWD? 36 00:01:56,560 --> 00:01:57,960 Speaker 1: But now it's just like. 37 00:01:58,040 --> 00:02:00,320 Speaker 2: All of a sudden, I'm talking to people who don't 38 00:02:00,320 --> 00:02:02,559 Speaker 2: even know a sock or an equity or mutual funds 39 00:02:02,600 --> 00:02:03,080 Speaker 2: and they're. 40 00:02:02,920 --> 00:02:04,240 Speaker 3: Like, oh, he is G said that. 41 00:02:04,360 --> 00:02:05,720 Speaker 4: Yeah, exactly what. 42 00:02:05,640 --> 00:02:06,080 Speaker 5: Does it means? 43 00:02:06,080 --> 00:02:08,760 Speaker 3: I don't know, but it's evil wait bad. 44 00:02:10,760 --> 00:02:14,400 Speaker 1: Welcome to Crash Course, a podcast about business, political, and 45 00:02:14,440 --> 00:02:17,880 Speaker 1: social disruption and what we can learn from it. I'm 46 00:02:17,880 --> 00:02:22,560 Speaker 1: Tim O'Brien, Robert Netsley personifies a bigger war going on 47 00:02:22,600 --> 00:02:26,040 Speaker 1: in the investment world and American politics over a little 48 00:02:26,040 --> 00:02:30,200 Speaker 1: acronym called ESG. In the last year, there's been a 49 00:02:30,200 --> 00:02:34,400 Speaker 1: Republican backlash to the trillions of dollars committed to investing 50 00:02:34,440 --> 00:02:39,359 Speaker 1: practices that take environmental, social, and governance concerns into account. 51 00:02:40,440 --> 00:02:44,320 Speaker 1: And then there's Robert. He's an evangelical Christian trying to 52 00:02:44,360 --> 00:02:47,240 Speaker 1: realize his values and stay true to his own beliefs 53 00:02:47,240 --> 00:02:50,919 Speaker 1: in the investing world. That's sometimes intersex with Wall Street's 54 00:02:51,200 --> 00:02:56,720 Speaker 1: ESG strategy, but it also lays bare some contradictions. My 55 00:02:56,840 --> 00:03:01,240 Speaker 1: colleague Sagel Kishan reports on ESG and staying for Bloomberg News, 56 00:03:01,560 --> 00:03:04,600 Speaker 1: and she flew to Idaho to meet with Robert. She 57 00:03:04,680 --> 00:03:08,480 Speaker 1: wrote a fascinating piece last fall called what would Jesus buy? 58 00:03:09,280 --> 00:03:13,519 Speaker 1: Investor charts course for two billion dollar fund and she's 59 00:03:13,560 --> 00:03:15,600 Speaker 1: going to share more of that story with us for 60 00:03:15,720 --> 00:03:21,920 Speaker 1: today's crash course Conservatives versus ESG. It's a tale of 61 00:03:21,919 --> 00:03:24,959 Speaker 1: two conflicts in a way, should there be biases in 62 00:03:25,000 --> 00:03:28,680 Speaker 1: the investing world, be it faith based or social activism? 63 00:03:29,040 --> 00:03:35,200 Speaker 1: And should ESG exist at all? Welcome to the show, Stagel, 64 00:03:35,480 --> 00:03:38,600 Speaker 1: Thanks for having me. So before we dive back into 65 00:03:38,640 --> 00:03:41,720 Speaker 1: Robert's story, I want listeners to get to know you 66 00:03:41,760 --> 00:03:44,280 Speaker 1: a little bit more. You've been at Bloomberg about twenty 67 00:03:44,360 --> 00:03:46,480 Speaker 1: years now. And how long have you been on the 68 00:03:46,680 --> 00:03:47,240 Speaker 1: ESG beat. 69 00:03:47,640 --> 00:03:50,080 Speaker 4: It's just over three years, just before the pandemic. We 70 00:03:50,080 --> 00:03:51,920 Speaker 4: start to the beat, and why ESG? 71 00:03:52,120 --> 00:03:54,320 Speaker 1: Why do you love this little corner of the market. 72 00:03:54,600 --> 00:03:59,560 Speaker 4: It's complex, it's undefined, it's everywhere but nowhere. Just trying 73 00:03:59,560 --> 00:04:02,200 Speaker 4: to figure out the complexities is what draw me to 74 00:04:02,240 --> 00:04:02,600 Speaker 4: the beat. 75 00:04:02,840 --> 00:04:05,800 Speaker 1: And you're good at solving complexities. I wish Oh, I 76 00:04:05,840 --> 00:04:08,480 Speaker 1: bet you are. I think you are. That's why you're here. Now. 77 00:04:08,640 --> 00:04:11,720 Speaker 1: How did you find out about Robert Netsley? What attracted 78 00:04:11,760 --> 00:04:12,800 Speaker 1: you to him as a story? 79 00:04:13,280 --> 00:04:13,440 Speaker 6: Well? 80 00:04:13,480 --> 00:04:16,159 Speaker 4: I first heard about him after the shooting in Yavaldi, 81 00:04:16,320 --> 00:04:19,680 Speaker 4: Texas last year, and I was looking at whether esh 82 00:04:19,880 --> 00:04:24,120 Speaker 4: funds held gunstocks and I thought, obviously no. But then 83 00:04:24,160 --> 00:04:26,920 Speaker 4: I found his funds and we found that he held 84 00:04:26,960 --> 00:04:30,919 Speaker 4: shares in the firearms company called stm Rugger, one of 85 00:04:30,960 --> 00:04:34,480 Speaker 4: the big ones, and a shooting sports company called Vista Outdoor. 86 00:04:35,000 --> 00:04:38,800 Speaker 4: So I called him. He said that gun violence is deplorable, 87 00:04:39,120 --> 00:04:43,800 Speaker 4: but guns themselves aren't unethical or immoral by themselves. I 88 00:04:43,839 --> 00:04:46,000 Speaker 4: remember thinking it was a little weird, but to me 89 00:04:46,120 --> 00:04:48,960 Speaker 4: it was new to hear about a conservative version of ESHI. 90 00:04:49,640 --> 00:04:51,920 Speaker 4: I knew I had to learn more, so I helped 91 00:04:51,920 --> 00:04:53,880 Speaker 4: on a plane and feutre boise last year. 92 00:04:55,400 --> 00:04:57,320 Speaker 1: Okay, well, so why don't you take over the story 93 00:04:57,360 --> 00:04:59,480 Speaker 1: from there, and then we'll meet back here later in 94 00:04:59,520 --> 00:05:02,360 Speaker 1: the eppisode to talk more about ESG and. 95 00:05:02,360 --> 00:05:15,320 Speaker 4: What you've learned sounds great, Robert Nesle is a small 96 00:05:15,400 --> 00:05:18,640 Speaker 4: part of a bigger clash that's going on in America. 97 00:05:18,839 --> 00:05:23,000 Speaker 4: Red versus blue, and the worlds of financing investing haven't 98 00:05:23,000 --> 00:05:28,680 Speaker 4: been immune. EESG, which stands for Environmental, Social and Governance Investing, 99 00:05:29,120 --> 00:05:32,800 Speaker 4: has become a pinata and dragged into the cultural wars. 100 00:05:33,480 --> 00:05:37,200 Speaker 4: On the one hand, proponents of ESG say it's important 101 00:05:37,240 --> 00:05:40,799 Speaker 4: to take into account things like climate change and workers' 102 00:05:40,880 --> 00:05:46,560 Speaker 4: rights when making financing and investing decisions, especially amid societal changes, 103 00:05:47,040 --> 00:05:52,039 Speaker 4: regulation and pressing problems like global warming, when opponents on 104 00:05:52,080 --> 00:05:55,719 Speaker 4: the political right say ESG has become a way for 105 00:05:55,839 --> 00:06:00,279 Speaker 4: progressives to impose their views and their goals on financial markets, 106 00:06:01,200 --> 00:06:04,760 Speaker 4: essentially a threat to the American way of doing business. 107 00:06:05,480 --> 00:06:08,080 Speaker 4: Robert Nesley is somewhere in the middle of those two. 108 00:06:08,520 --> 00:06:11,960 Speaker 4: He's a bit of an anomaly. He straddles both sides. 109 00:06:12,680 --> 00:06:15,240 Speaker 4: In one sense, he is a faith based investor who 110 00:06:15,279 --> 00:06:19,200 Speaker 4: excludes things like tobacco and alcohol from his portfolio. On 111 00:06:19,279 --> 00:06:22,960 Speaker 4: the other he invests in gun makers and pushes back 112 00:06:23,040 --> 00:06:27,240 Speaker 4: on things like LGBTQ issues. We'll get into more of 113 00:06:27,279 --> 00:06:30,880 Speaker 4: that later, but first I want you to hear where 114 00:06:30,960 --> 00:06:36,280 Speaker 4: Robert came from. He grew up in California, in the 115 00:06:36,279 --> 00:06:40,160 Speaker 4: Monterey Bay area. His parents married right out of high 116 00:06:40,160 --> 00:06:43,080 Speaker 4: school and had Roberts and his younger brother not long 117 00:06:43,120 --> 00:06:48,000 Speaker 4: after that. His mom stopped using drugs, but his dad didn't. 118 00:06:48,120 --> 00:06:48,960 Speaker 3: So they got the worst one. 119 00:06:48,960 --> 00:06:51,479 Speaker 2: I was about three, reading by my mom, my younger 120 00:06:51,480 --> 00:06:55,160 Speaker 2: brother's artistic in on food stamps for a little bit, 121 00:06:55,160 --> 00:06:56,960 Speaker 2: and all that kind of thing, going through life, and 122 00:06:57,720 --> 00:06:59,120 Speaker 2: just really seeing the faithlesser going. 123 00:06:59,040 --> 00:06:59,880 Speaker 3: Through all of that. 124 00:07:00,680 --> 00:07:04,320 Speaker 4: As evangelical Christians, they went to church. The community there 125 00:07:04,360 --> 00:07:07,360 Speaker 4: gave Robert sability and he had a sense that God 126 00:07:07,440 --> 00:07:10,680 Speaker 4: was providing for his family. But he really found God 127 00:07:10,720 --> 00:07:13,240 Speaker 4: one day when he was seven years old and on 128 00:07:13,360 --> 00:07:13,920 Speaker 4: time out. 129 00:07:14,520 --> 00:07:20,480 Speaker 2: I remember this really feeling like sorry for myself whatever, whatever, 130 00:07:20,480 --> 00:07:23,760 Speaker 2: nobody loves me, YadA, yah YadA, And you know, writing 131 00:07:23,760 --> 00:07:27,200 Speaker 2: in my ciddy and it's remembering what the pastor said 132 00:07:27,200 --> 00:07:31,080 Speaker 2: that you know, Jesus loves you actually and he will 133 00:07:32,040 --> 00:07:34,920 Speaker 2: forgive you of your sin. And as a seven year 134 00:07:34,920 --> 00:07:38,000 Speaker 2: old does, I remember praying and asking Jesus to come 135 00:07:38,040 --> 00:07:40,400 Speaker 2: into my heart, you know, and I give him mind 136 00:07:40,400 --> 00:07:42,920 Speaker 2: to him there and then that's when personally I made 137 00:07:42,920 --> 00:07:45,720 Speaker 2: a decision to really follow Christ in a very childlike way. 138 00:07:46,360 --> 00:07:49,440 Speaker 4: Robert went to community college then later got his college 139 00:07:49,440 --> 00:07:52,440 Speaker 4: degree online. In between that, he met his wife at 140 00:07:52,440 --> 00:07:55,800 Speaker 4: a tiny church in his hometown. They lived a life 141 00:07:55,800 --> 00:07:59,480 Speaker 4: of what he called intentional ministry, doing work in the 142 00:07:59,480 --> 00:08:03,080 Speaker 4: community in the name of God. He worked with high 143 00:08:03,120 --> 00:08:06,680 Speaker 4: schoolers with disabilities and at a pro life pregnancy center. 144 00:08:07,560 --> 00:08:09,600 Speaker 4: When he and his wife started having kids and needed 145 00:08:09,600 --> 00:08:12,760 Speaker 4: more money, he got a job at a Volkswagen dealership 146 00:08:13,040 --> 00:08:16,080 Speaker 4: until it closed during the two thousand and eight financial crisis. 147 00:08:16,360 --> 00:08:18,560 Speaker 2: On my way home from getting let go, when they 148 00:08:18,600 --> 00:08:21,600 Speaker 2: told everybody, you know what was going on, like ahead 149 00:08:21,720 --> 00:08:24,160 Speaker 2: was kind of spending respecting our second baby, and like, 150 00:08:24,200 --> 00:08:25,480 Speaker 2: I don't know what I'm going to do, So we 151 00:08:25,840 --> 00:08:29,360 Speaker 2: just kind of pulled over and spraying and really felt 152 00:08:29,400 --> 00:08:30,920 Speaker 2: the piece of God to say, like, you know what, 153 00:08:31,080 --> 00:08:33,680 Speaker 2: you've never liked that job anyway, this is your opportunity 154 00:08:33,720 --> 00:08:36,200 Speaker 2: to do whatever you want to do and. 155 00:08:36,120 --> 00:08:36,880 Speaker 3: I'll take care of it. 156 00:08:38,440 --> 00:08:41,200 Speaker 4: So he thought about what jobs could have family friendly hours, 157 00:08:41,360 --> 00:08:43,319 Speaker 4: and he decided to look for a job at a bank. 158 00:08:44,120 --> 00:08:46,280 Speaker 4: He applied to everything he could, and then he got 159 00:08:46,280 --> 00:08:49,920 Speaker 4: a gig with Wells Fargo in their investment department. Even 160 00:08:49,960 --> 00:08:52,800 Speaker 4: though math was his worst subject in school, he picked 161 00:08:52,840 --> 00:08:55,760 Speaker 4: it up really quickly, got license and moved into a 162 00:08:55,840 --> 00:08:59,480 Speaker 4: role advising clients on their investments. He says he was 163 00:08:59,520 --> 00:09:02,880 Speaker 4: happy as clam until decided to lead a Bible study 164 00:09:03,080 --> 00:09:06,480 Speaker 4: on finances at his church. He wanted to talk about 165 00:09:06,480 --> 00:09:09,240 Speaker 4: what the Bible teaches people about money. So he starts 166 00:09:09,240 --> 00:09:10,640 Speaker 4: for searching and then. 167 00:09:10,559 --> 00:09:14,120 Speaker 2: Some article came up about the response investing like investing 168 00:09:14,160 --> 00:09:18,520 Speaker 2: interesting click and introduced this concept of Hayrid thought about 169 00:09:18,600 --> 00:09:22,360 Speaker 2: what the companies you own, like you're an owner, what 170 00:09:22,400 --> 00:09:25,040 Speaker 2: they're actually doing to make money? Right? And so if 171 00:09:25,040 --> 00:09:27,480 Speaker 2: you own Netflix or whatever videos like would you have 172 00:09:27,520 --> 00:09:29,480 Speaker 2: a video store that sold pornography videos in the back? 173 00:09:29,800 --> 00:09:32,440 Speaker 2: Like no, I wouldn't, and yet that's exactly what we 174 00:09:32,520 --> 00:09:33,719 Speaker 2: do as shareholders. 175 00:09:34,120 --> 00:09:36,320 Speaker 4: Robert says, there are lots of scriptures in the Bible 176 00:09:36,440 --> 00:09:38,680 Speaker 4: that say it's bad to make money off of things 177 00:09:38,679 --> 00:09:39,120 Speaker 4: that are. 178 00:09:39,000 --> 00:09:41,400 Speaker 3: Immoral, that is attestable to the Lord. 179 00:09:41,880 --> 00:09:44,560 Speaker 4: So he turned to his own investments, and he quickly 180 00:09:44,559 --> 00:09:47,160 Speaker 4: found what he considers to be a major red flag. 181 00:09:48,120 --> 00:09:51,840 Speaker 4: He had been investing in companies that manufacture aborta fashions 182 00:09:51,960 --> 00:09:55,480 Speaker 4: or drugs that help end a pregnancy. His heart sank. 183 00:09:56,360 --> 00:09:59,640 Speaker 4: Remember he was the president of a pro life pregnancy center, 184 00:10:00,040 --> 00:10:03,280 Speaker 4: and his reading of the Bible concluded that abortion is bad, 185 00:10:03,960 --> 00:10:06,960 Speaker 4: So that investment was a complete no no for him. 186 00:10:06,800 --> 00:10:09,839 Speaker 2: I remember sitting in my desk sort of slack job 187 00:10:09,920 --> 00:10:13,800 Speaker 2: like this son, that this was something that I had missed, 188 00:10:13,800 --> 00:10:17,920 Speaker 2: that the church is obviously missing, and that I couldn't 189 00:10:17,920 --> 00:10:20,320 Speaker 2: do my job like somebody came to mist right now 190 00:10:20,360 --> 00:10:21,520 Speaker 2: and asked me to play the trade. 191 00:10:21,320 --> 00:10:24,720 Speaker 3: Like I couldn't do it with a queen conscience. And 192 00:10:24,760 --> 00:10:27,560 Speaker 3: then I go craps because what else was I going 193 00:10:27,640 --> 00:10:29,880 Speaker 3: to do? And so it's incredibly frightening. 194 00:10:30,400 --> 00:10:32,800 Speaker 4: So he quit the bank, and he said he felt 195 00:10:32,800 --> 00:10:36,120 Speaker 4: God was calling him to do something else, he dabbled 196 00:10:36,200 --> 00:10:39,679 Speaker 4: with what he called biblically responsible investing, and then in 197 00:10:39,679 --> 00:10:44,240 Speaker 4: twenty fifteen he started his own firm called Inspire Investing. Essentially, 198 00:10:44,480 --> 00:10:48,760 Speaker 4: Inspire invests in companies it seems worthy, engages with those 199 00:10:48,800 --> 00:10:52,160 Speaker 4: that it hopes to convert, and excludes or divest from 200 00:10:52,240 --> 00:10:53,720 Speaker 4: ones that it finds immoral. 201 00:10:53,960 --> 00:11:00,520 Speaker 2: In the Apostle Paul, in one of his letters to churches, 202 00:11:01,080 --> 00:11:03,320 Speaker 2: it talks about how he's like he's compelled to preach 203 00:11:03,360 --> 00:11:05,400 Speaker 2: the gospel and there's there's nothing else that he can do. 204 00:11:05,440 --> 00:11:07,160 Speaker 3: He's just he's compelled to preach the gospel. 205 00:11:07,800 --> 00:11:09,640 Speaker 2: And I really felt like that, like I'm compelled, like 206 00:11:09,640 --> 00:11:12,720 Speaker 2: there's nothing else I can do other than then this, 207 00:11:13,360 --> 00:11:16,959 Speaker 2: you know, goes share this story with people, and I 208 00:11:16,960 --> 00:11:19,040 Speaker 2: don't know how it's going to end up, you. 209 00:11:18,960 --> 00:11:20,959 Speaker 3: Know, maybe terribly financially, but this is what I have 210 00:11:21,080 --> 00:11:21,240 Speaker 3: to do. 211 00:11:21,600 --> 00:11:23,040 Speaker 2: So of course of my eye step out of the mote, 212 00:11:23,200 --> 00:11:26,640 Speaker 2: and you know, trusted God, and he's been he's been faithful. 213 00:11:28,400 --> 00:11:31,280 Speaker 4: The market was exceptionally bad last year because of inflation, 214 00:11:31,640 --> 00:11:34,439 Speaker 4: the war in the Ukraine, and fears of a global overcession. 215 00:11:35,080 --> 00:11:37,280 Speaker 4: So maybe it doesn't mean a lot that his biggest 216 00:11:37,280 --> 00:11:40,960 Speaker 4: fund slumped about twenty four percent last year. If we 217 00:11:40,960 --> 00:11:44,440 Speaker 4: look back to a good year twenty nineteen, his fund 218 00:11:44,480 --> 00:11:46,720 Speaker 4: was up twenty eight percent, but it was still slightly 219 00:11:46,760 --> 00:11:50,520 Speaker 4: below the overall startle markets. But remember what Robert said 220 00:11:50,520 --> 00:11:53,440 Speaker 4: at the beginning of this episode. For him, it's not 221 00:11:53,679 --> 00:11:56,320 Speaker 4: all about making money. 222 00:11:56,400 --> 00:11:58,559 Speaker 2: I'm not an investor who's a Christian, like I'm a 223 00:11:58,640 --> 00:12:00,480 Speaker 2: Christian who has to work and investment industry. 224 00:12:01,160 --> 00:12:05,160 Speaker 4: Many of the biggest and most profitable companies are excluded 225 00:12:05,160 --> 00:12:08,440 Speaker 4: from his portfolio, which is almost a guarantee that his 226 00:12:08,559 --> 00:12:10,240 Speaker 4: investments will underperform. 227 00:12:10,440 --> 00:12:14,760 Speaker 2: We exclude companies that you know, support legislation that is 228 00:12:15,440 --> 00:12:18,959 Speaker 2: anpathetical to a biblical viewpoint, like pushes a certagy or 229 00:12:19,120 --> 00:12:22,600 Speaker 2: doing money to an activist organization that's explicitly pushing an 230 00:12:22,640 --> 00:12:24,240 Speaker 2: unbiblable viewpoint on those areas. 231 00:12:27,000 --> 00:12:30,240 Speaker 4: So Robert's reading of the Bible says abortion is bad. 232 00:12:31,000 --> 00:12:33,280 Speaker 4: We'll think of all the companies that announce that they 233 00:12:33,320 --> 00:12:36,400 Speaker 4: would pay for employees to travel for an abortion after 234 00:12:36,440 --> 00:12:41,040 Speaker 4: the Supreme Court overturn rov Wade last summer, They're out 235 00:12:41,080 --> 00:12:45,320 Speaker 4: of his portfolio. Also excluded all of the companies that 236 00:12:45,400 --> 00:12:49,440 Speaker 4: support or finance floats during the Pride Parade. His reading 237 00:12:49,480 --> 00:12:53,920 Speaker 4: of the Bible isn't supportive of LGBTQ rights either. I'll 238 00:12:53,960 --> 00:12:56,760 Speaker 4: just note here that while Netley says that he loves 239 00:12:56,800 --> 00:13:01,320 Speaker 4: his LGBTQ neighbors, he doesn't want what he describes as 240 00:13:01,360 --> 00:13:06,400 Speaker 4: their lifestyles promoted in society and by companies. Nor does 241 00:13:06,440 --> 00:13:09,120 Speaker 4: he want companies to discriminate against people like Kim in 242 00:13:09,160 --> 00:13:13,520 Speaker 4: the workplace who hold more traditional views on marriage. So 243 00:13:13,920 --> 00:13:17,920 Speaker 4: abortion access and LGBTQ rights are only two issues, but 244 00:13:18,000 --> 00:13:20,320 Speaker 4: they put a lot of companies on the exclude list. 245 00:13:21,480 --> 00:13:25,240 Speaker 4: Other companies are shunned for reasons such as distributing pornography, 246 00:13:25,720 --> 00:13:30,200 Speaker 4: selling tobacco and alcohol products, funding stem cell research, and 247 00:13:30,240 --> 00:13:35,600 Speaker 4: promoting in vitro fertilization. All in all, Robert says Inspire 248 00:13:35,760 --> 00:13:39,760 Speaker 4: excludes about half of this in P. Five hundred, companies 249 00:13:39,840 --> 00:13:47,720 Speaker 4: like Amazon, Walmart's Apple, and Google's parent company alphabets. In 250 00:13:47,760 --> 00:13:50,360 Speaker 4: an effort to limit the number of companies on the 251 00:13:50,440 --> 00:13:55,160 Speaker 4: exclude list, Robert will often press executives, encouraging them to 252 00:13:55,200 --> 00:14:00,000 Speaker 4: avoid what he says is politicization. Here's one examples. 253 00:14:00,000 --> 00:14:03,160 Speaker 7: So, who likes costco wholesale fans of free samples in 254 00:14:03,160 --> 00:14:03,480 Speaker 7: the room. 255 00:14:03,760 --> 00:14:07,000 Speaker 4: He's on the stage at a conservative conference in twenty eighteen. 256 00:14:07,480 --> 00:14:09,839 Speaker 7: Last summer, we were alerted to the fact that they 257 00:14:09,880 --> 00:14:13,400 Speaker 7: had begun sponsoring certain gay pride parades throughout the country, 258 00:14:13,800 --> 00:14:17,559 Speaker 7: a handful of different cities. Obviously, this is concerning to us. 259 00:14:18,000 --> 00:14:19,800 Speaker 7: So I picked up the phone and I just called 260 00:14:19,840 --> 00:14:21,640 Speaker 7: Investor Relations, he said. 261 00:14:21,680 --> 00:14:25,080 Speaker 4: The CFO called him back and they had several conversations. 262 00:14:25,480 --> 00:14:28,120 Speaker 7: About six weeks after that initial phone call, got another 263 00:14:28,160 --> 00:14:31,200 Speaker 7: call from this gentleman telling us that Costco had made 264 00:14:31,200 --> 00:14:34,200 Speaker 7: the executive decision not to support divisive issues his word, 265 00:14:34,240 --> 00:14:37,120 Speaker 7: divisive issues such as gay pride parades. 266 00:14:38,160 --> 00:14:41,760 Speaker 4: Costco wouldn't respond to requests for comment, but these sorts 267 00:14:41,760 --> 00:14:45,040 Speaker 4: of campaigns show that his work is about more than 268 00:14:45,160 --> 00:14:49,440 Speaker 4: just investing in this faith. He's having an influence. It 269 00:14:49,440 --> 00:14:52,360 Speaker 4: doesn't always go his way, though, He says he's tried 270 00:14:52,360 --> 00:14:56,800 Speaker 4: to persuade Smuckers against supporting lgbth wrights and other quality issues. 271 00:14:57,480 --> 00:15:00,440 Speaker 4: He's also tried to press six Sporting Goods against paying 272 00:15:00,480 --> 00:15:06,480 Speaker 4: for employee travel for abortions, but so far he's been unsuccessful. Yet, 273 00:15:06,600 --> 00:15:08,680 Speaker 4: Robert says he avoids the shame game. 274 00:15:08,840 --> 00:15:13,400 Speaker 2: One of the big criticisms of physically responsible investing generally 275 00:15:13,480 --> 00:15:16,800 Speaker 2: is that it can be easily perceived or assumed that 276 00:15:16,880 --> 00:15:19,800 Speaker 2: it's a guilt trip game, right, like, hey, did you 277 00:15:19,840 --> 00:15:20,880 Speaker 2: know that you're invested in this thing? 278 00:15:20,960 --> 00:15:21,200 Speaker 6: Shame? 279 00:15:21,880 --> 00:15:24,920 Speaker 2: And unfortunately, I think historically there have been those that 280 00:15:24,920 --> 00:15:27,920 Speaker 2: have taken that approach. Good intentions maybe, but you know, 281 00:15:28,200 --> 00:15:30,360 Speaker 2: run approach. And you know, we've heard a lot of people, 282 00:15:30,440 --> 00:15:32,480 Speaker 2: especially from the early days and like before we got 283 00:15:32,480 --> 00:15:35,000 Speaker 2: involved in like the decades, you know, nineties and eighties 284 00:15:35,000 --> 00:15:37,640 Speaker 2: and whatnot, that that really was the perception that it 285 00:15:37,680 --> 00:15:41,000 Speaker 2: was like a guilt and shame sort of legalistic approach, 286 00:15:41,440 --> 00:15:45,960 Speaker 2: which is, you know, distasteful and not really difficult. We're 287 00:15:45,960 --> 00:15:48,840 Speaker 2: supposed to be compelled by love and grace, not guilt 288 00:15:48,880 --> 00:15:49,240 Speaker 2: and shame. 289 00:15:49,840 --> 00:15:52,080 Speaker 4: So take that as you will. But one thing that 290 00:15:52,200 --> 00:15:54,920 Speaker 4: really struck me was that he decided to label his 291 00:15:55,000 --> 00:15:59,000 Speaker 4: funders e SG. When I thought about it, it made 292 00:15:59,040 --> 00:16:03,600 Speaker 4: sense in some ways. I mean, Inspire certainly screens companies 293 00:16:03,640 --> 00:16:07,360 Speaker 4: by a variety of categories that fall under E S 294 00:16:07,440 --> 00:16:11,640 Speaker 4: and G topics, which is environmental, social and governance issues. 295 00:16:12,240 --> 00:16:17,440 Speaker 4: Inspire will screen for human rights violations, forced labor and 296 00:16:17,480 --> 00:16:21,720 Speaker 4: other worker issues like minimum wage policies. It'll look at 297 00:16:21,720 --> 00:16:25,040 Speaker 4: whether companies are cognizant of their environmental impacts such as 298 00:16:25,160 --> 00:16:29,520 Speaker 4: water consumption and air pollution, and INSPIRE will screen for 299 00:16:29,640 --> 00:16:34,720 Speaker 4: discriminatory or prejectory lending, whether companies are aggressively marketing products 300 00:16:34,720 --> 00:16:38,960 Speaker 4: in low income communities. All of those are considered issue factors. 301 00:16:39,600 --> 00:16:42,320 Speaker 4: But the day I visited him last August, that was 302 00:16:42,360 --> 00:16:46,280 Speaker 4: all about to change. Right before our interview, he was 303 00:16:46,320 --> 00:16:48,880 Speaker 4: in a meeting with his board and they decided to 304 00:16:48,960 --> 00:16:51,320 Speaker 4: remove the E issue label from their funds. 305 00:16:51,640 --> 00:16:53,440 Speaker 2: I don't know if there was some meeting that they 306 00:16:53,440 --> 00:16:56,600 Speaker 2: had in conservative radio land or something, right, but like, hey, 307 00:16:56,680 --> 00:16:58,160 Speaker 2: this year, let's talk about USU every. 308 00:16:58,000 --> 00:17:01,160 Speaker 3: Single time we go on here. So the you know, 309 00:17:01,280 --> 00:17:04,000 Speaker 3: just we noticed the rhetoric is like increasing. Hmm. Watching this, 310 00:17:04,160 --> 00:17:05,159 Speaker 3: I don't know how that's going to go. 311 00:17:05,440 --> 00:17:07,080 Speaker 2: We're committed to like trying to be alive, trying to 312 00:17:07,080 --> 00:17:10,840 Speaker 2: be redemptant influence on ESG, and meanwhile we're getting like 313 00:17:10,960 --> 00:17:13,000 Speaker 2: lambassad from the left for like staying reesg. 314 00:17:13,720 --> 00:17:16,880 Speaker 4: Roberts says he got blowback from liberal corners for claiming 315 00:17:16,920 --> 00:17:20,320 Speaker 4: the ESG label while investing in socks that might contradict 316 00:17:20,359 --> 00:17:25,199 Speaker 4: a more traditional understanding of what ESG means. Meanwhile, his 317 00:17:25,320 --> 00:17:28,479 Speaker 4: more conservative clients were also getting confused by the label. 318 00:17:29,320 --> 00:17:33,000 Speaker 4: Conservative talking heads like Glenn Beck and Tucker Carson had 319 00:17:33,040 --> 00:17:36,760 Speaker 4: been attacking ESG on air, describing it as what they 320 00:17:36,840 --> 00:17:42,000 Speaker 4: call a leftist agenda. So have high profile politicians such 321 00:17:42,000 --> 00:17:46,040 Speaker 4: as Florida Governor Ron de Santis and former Vice President 322 00:17:46,160 --> 00:17:50,520 Speaker 4: Mike Pence. Beck has said ESG poses a danger to 323 00:17:50,680 --> 00:17:54,480 Speaker 4: soul of America. DeSantis has gone as far as directing 324 00:17:54,520 --> 00:17:56,840 Speaker 4: his state to pull billions of dollars from black Rock, 325 00:17:57,280 --> 00:17:59,800 Speaker 4: the Wall Street money manager that's been the most vocal 326 00:18:00,240 --> 00:18:04,000 Speaker 4: about pressing companies on issues like climate change, and more 327 00:18:04,040 --> 00:18:09,080 Speaker 4: than a dozen states have pushed anti ESG laws. So, 328 00:18:09,160 --> 00:18:13,080 Speaker 4: if all these guys are calling ESG woke capitalism, what 329 00:18:13,119 --> 00:18:16,960 Speaker 4: was inspired doing? Robert says he wishes es SHE could 330 00:18:16,960 --> 00:18:19,640 Speaker 4: be seen as more neutral, But it is what it is. 331 00:18:20,280 --> 00:18:24,639 Speaker 2: It's a narrative that we are powerless to counteract. If 332 00:18:24,640 --> 00:18:28,320 Speaker 2: we had a bigger microphone than maybe we would try. 333 00:18:27,760 --> 00:18:33,640 Speaker 2: But the amount, Yeah, like when every conservative pundit is 334 00:18:34,000 --> 00:18:36,040 Speaker 2: calling an evil, like, we just cannot. 335 00:18:36,440 --> 00:18:37,359 Speaker 3: Counteract that narrative. 336 00:18:37,960 --> 00:18:42,000 Speaker 4: Not that Robert necessary wants to counteract conservative talking points. 337 00:18:42,480 --> 00:18:45,000 Speaker 4: He is on the conservative end of the spectrum, after all, 338 00:18:45,880 --> 00:18:48,880 Speaker 4: and he shared the stage at conservative conferences with big 339 00:18:48,960 --> 00:18:53,240 Speaker 4: names from the Republican Party. He says he won't endorse candidates, 340 00:18:53,840 --> 00:18:56,600 Speaker 4: but his work naturally leads him to back or speak 341 00:18:56,640 --> 00:18:59,960 Speaker 4: as against companies based on whether they're handling of socially 342 00:19:00,080 --> 00:19:02,320 Speaker 4: shoes conforms to his reading of the Bible. 343 00:19:02,840 --> 00:19:07,439 Speaker 2: We believe that a healthy business respects all viewpoints, right, 344 00:19:07,480 --> 00:19:09,800 Speaker 2: and they certainly they claim to be tolerant and inclusive, 345 00:19:10,119 --> 00:19:12,680 Speaker 2: then they should actually be so in practice. 346 00:19:13,760 --> 00:19:16,280 Speaker 3: So do you want them neutral or do you want 347 00:19:16,320 --> 00:19:18,199 Speaker 3: them to keep kends what you mean by neutral? Right, 348 00:19:18,240 --> 00:19:21,520 Speaker 3: So it means neutral by allowing all points. 349 00:19:21,359 --> 00:19:26,119 Speaker 4: Just making shoes, just sit to making cheese. 350 00:19:28,119 --> 00:19:32,159 Speaker 6: If it's Nike, yes I would like him Betral, not 351 00:19:32,760 --> 00:19:35,720 Speaker 6: if it's Bobby Lobby or just like what I'd like 352 00:19:35,800 --> 00:19:38,280 Speaker 6: them to keep not being neutral, you know. 353 00:19:38,320 --> 00:19:40,760 Speaker 2: But even those companies they respect new point, diversity and 354 00:19:40,840 --> 00:19:43,719 Speaker 2: all sorts of people working there, so they're not It's 355 00:19:43,800 --> 00:19:49,320 Speaker 2: neutrality in you know, not imposing your beliefs, you know 356 00:19:49,480 --> 00:19:53,040 Speaker 2: upon people working there in a way that is you know, 357 00:19:53,200 --> 00:19:55,680 Speaker 2: heavy handed or whatever else like it's respecting all viewpoints. 358 00:19:57,240 --> 00:19:59,919 Speaker 1: Wow. Wow, I'm sorry to interrupt Segel, but this is 359 00:20:00,200 --> 00:20:03,320 Speaker 1: just so interesting to me. Robert sounds like such a 360 00:20:03,320 --> 00:20:06,520 Speaker 1: likable man, and he has goals of realizing his values 361 00:20:06,560 --> 00:20:10,919 Speaker 1: as an investor and through his portfolio. But I also 362 00:20:10,960 --> 00:20:13,760 Speaker 1: think there's some hypocrisy and contradictions going on here that 363 00:20:13,800 --> 00:20:19,480 Speaker 1: are worth exploring. He's asking companies like Nike, for example, 364 00:20:19,560 --> 00:20:22,480 Speaker 1: to be neutral and to not put values ahead of 365 00:20:22,520 --> 00:20:25,080 Speaker 1: their product line for example, or do not put values 366 00:20:25,080 --> 00:20:28,240 Speaker 1: ahead of their sponsorships. And yet then he's turning around 367 00:20:28,240 --> 00:20:31,800 Speaker 1: and saying Chick fil A or a hobby lobby is 368 00:20:31,880 --> 00:20:34,920 Speaker 1: doing the right thing by restricting certain people from its 369 00:20:34,960 --> 00:20:39,240 Speaker 1: premises or from its product line. And that just feels 370 00:20:39,280 --> 00:20:43,200 Speaker 1: to me like a deep contradiction, especially from someone who 371 00:20:43,520 --> 00:20:46,760 Speaker 1: says they're a Christian if you accept that sort of 372 00:20:46,840 --> 00:20:50,680 Speaker 1: a basic tenet of Christianity is love and forgiveness. Who 373 00:20:50,760 --> 00:20:53,800 Speaker 1: is he really forgiving? Who does he really love when 374 00:20:53,840 --> 00:20:57,400 Speaker 1: he's working through where he's going to invest? And then 375 00:20:57,440 --> 00:21:01,480 Speaker 1: the criticisms he has of other people for making exactly 376 00:21:01,520 --> 00:21:02,880 Speaker 1: the same choice as he does. 377 00:21:03,400 --> 00:21:05,560 Speaker 4: Well, that's where it gets all murky. A lot of 378 00:21:05,600 --> 00:21:09,720 Speaker 4: conservatives feel that corporate America has been co opted by 379 00:21:09,760 --> 00:21:13,560 Speaker 4: liberals who are pushing goals like climate change, for instance. 380 00:21:14,280 --> 00:21:18,639 Speaker 4: These conservatives want businesses to focus on business and to 381 00:21:18,760 --> 00:21:22,560 Speaker 4: be more neutral and not following liberal goals. 382 00:21:23,080 --> 00:21:25,120 Speaker 1: Yeah, but neutrality is in the eye of the beholder, 383 00:21:25,359 --> 00:21:28,399 Speaker 1: too right, right, too right, and at least classically with investment, 384 00:21:28,440 --> 00:21:30,160 Speaker 1: if you're saying you're being neutral, you're trying to look 385 00:21:30,280 --> 00:21:32,920 Speaker 1: just at the numbers. And now you have these conflicts 386 00:21:32,920 --> 00:21:34,639 Speaker 1: between people who say, we have the numbers, but we 387 00:21:34,680 --> 00:21:38,040 Speaker 1: also have values. But then you have Robert Ntsley who's saying, 388 00:21:38,040 --> 00:21:40,520 Speaker 1: my values are good for me, but your values aren't 389 00:21:40,520 --> 00:21:41,040 Speaker 1: good for you. 390 00:21:42,000 --> 00:21:43,919 Speaker 4: Maybe this is a good place to pause on the story. 391 00:21:44,400 --> 00:21:47,560 Speaker 1: I agree. Let's take a break, and then where are 392 00:21:47,560 --> 00:21:48,720 Speaker 1: we going When we get back. 393 00:21:49,280 --> 00:21:50,960 Speaker 4: I want to step back and talk to some of 394 00:21:50,960 --> 00:21:53,480 Speaker 4: the experts I've been speaking to about what's going on 395 00:21:53,560 --> 00:21:56,199 Speaker 4: in the issue space, and then we'll go back to 396 00:21:56,440 --> 00:21:58,040 Speaker 4: roberts and here's some of his sorts. 397 00:21:58,640 --> 00:22:06,280 Speaker 1: Great, we'll be right back with all of that. Okay, 398 00:22:06,560 --> 00:22:09,680 Speaker 1: we're back with Bloomberg's ESG reporter Segel Kishan. 399 00:22:09,960 --> 00:22:10,840 Speaker 4: Thanks for having me. 400 00:22:11,240 --> 00:22:13,600 Speaker 1: So we've just heard the story of Robert Netsley, a 401 00:22:13,680 --> 00:22:16,879 Speaker 1: faith based investor in Idaho. But he's not the first 402 00:22:16,880 --> 00:22:20,520 Speaker 1: person obviously who's invested this way. So Sagel, why don't 403 00:22:20,560 --> 00:22:23,000 Speaker 1: you take over the story again and give our listeners 404 00:22:23,000 --> 00:22:23,760 Speaker 1: some of that history. 405 00:22:24,320 --> 00:22:28,520 Speaker 4: Faith based investing is the oldest full of sag Old capitalism. 406 00:22:28,720 --> 00:22:30,640 Speaker 3: Sure, I mean going back to you know, slave trade 407 00:22:30,680 --> 00:22:31,080 Speaker 3: in the UK. 408 00:22:31,880 --> 00:22:33,359 Speaker 4: This is Robert Netsley again. 409 00:22:33,920 --> 00:22:36,600 Speaker 2: Yeah, you had the Quakers and others who just refused 410 00:22:36,640 --> 00:22:41,359 Speaker 2: to invest in the slave trade. And we're outspoken about 411 00:22:41,400 --> 00:22:44,199 Speaker 2: slave trade. So it was people of faith, specifically Christian 412 00:22:44,200 --> 00:22:48,879 Speaker 2: faith in that context, and scripturally, like even thousands of 413 00:22:48,920 --> 00:22:53,680 Speaker 2: years before that, you've got proverbs and rules surrounding commerce 414 00:22:54,280 --> 00:22:59,439 Speaker 2: that prohibit immorality, like including the slave trade. You know, 415 00:23:00,160 --> 00:23:03,600 Speaker 2: kidnop exhilivating in Moses. This is an a moral business. 416 00:23:03,600 --> 00:23:06,240 Speaker 3: You don't steal people and sol THEO. 417 00:23:07,400 --> 00:23:11,320 Speaker 4: I called Nikita Singal to learn more about this. She's 418 00:23:11,359 --> 00:23:15,040 Speaker 4: the co head of Sustainable Investment and ESG at Lizard 419 00:23:15,160 --> 00:23:16,640 Speaker 4: Asset Management in New York. 420 00:23:17,440 --> 00:23:21,280 Speaker 8: Esg's birthplace was kind of from the Sri movement. 421 00:23:21,680 --> 00:23:26,760 Speaker 4: SRI that's socially responsible investing. She pointed to religious groups 422 00:23:26,800 --> 00:23:29,240 Speaker 4: like the Methodists as well. As sharer law in the 423 00:23:29,280 --> 00:23:30,240 Speaker 4: Muslim faith. 424 00:23:30,400 --> 00:23:34,040 Speaker 8: And many other religions have some form of influence over 425 00:23:34,160 --> 00:23:37,080 Speaker 8: how the followers of that faith should invest in line 426 00:23:37,080 --> 00:23:38,680 Speaker 8: with the principles of that religion. 427 00:23:39,240 --> 00:23:41,720 Speaker 4: When hot butts in is shoes later arose around the 428 00:23:41,800 --> 00:23:45,119 Speaker 4: Vietnam War and Apartheis in South Africa, a lot of 429 00:23:45,160 --> 00:23:49,439 Speaker 4: consumers started using their purchasing power to boycott companies turning 430 00:23:49,440 --> 00:23:50,120 Speaker 4: a profit there. 431 00:23:50,560 --> 00:23:53,680 Speaker 8: All of that time period was about investing in companies 432 00:23:53,720 --> 00:23:56,679 Speaker 8: that were we believed they were engaging in activities that 433 00:23:56,720 --> 00:23:59,399 Speaker 8: were not positive for society, and the tool that was 434 00:23:59,480 --> 00:24:02,520 Speaker 8: used was to just simply exclude investing in those companies 435 00:24:02,560 --> 00:24:06,600 Speaker 8: because it was signaling a specific value or a virtue. 436 00:24:06,960 --> 00:24:09,479 Speaker 8: I think ESG is very different from all of that. 437 00:24:10,200 --> 00:24:12,960 Speaker 4: In the Keysa's eyes as a person who does this 438 00:24:13,080 --> 00:24:14,280 Speaker 4: kind of investing every day. 439 00:24:15,320 --> 00:24:20,600 Speaker 8: ESG is not virtue signaling. It's not a product, it's 440 00:24:20,640 --> 00:24:23,920 Speaker 8: a process. It's actually part and parcel and a very 441 00:24:24,040 --> 00:24:27,240 Speaker 8: essential part of good investing. And what it is about 442 00:24:27,400 --> 00:24:30,480 Speaker 8: is thinking on behalf of our clients as their fiduciaries. 443 00:24:30,960 --> 00:24:34,159 Speaker 8: What are these emerging risks and opportunities related to the 444 00:24:34,280 --> 00:24:38,320 Speaker 8: environment and society that are increasingly becoming market issues. 445 00:24:39,000 --> 00:24:43,000 Speaker 4: When I told Nikisa about Robert's fund, she was unequivocal. 446 00:24:43,280 --> 00:24:45,120 Speaker 8: I would not consider that ESG. 447 00:24:46,000 --> 00:24:48,760 Speaker 4: She highlights it for me, the difference between ESG and 448 00:24:48,840 --> 00:24:53,200 Speaker 4: what she calls impacts investing. That's where an investor might 449 00:24:53,240 --> 00:24:56,600 Speaker 4: try to use their investments to affect change or influence 450 00:24:56,640 --> 00:24:57,840 Speaker 4: a company's policies. 451 00:24:58,359 --> 00:25:00,600 Speaker 8: There is a healthy and growing subst set of our 452 00:25:00,640 --> 00:25:02,639 Speaker 8: clients who are interested in that, and we need to 453 00:25:02,640 --> 00:25:05,000 Speaker 8: make sure that we can do it while keeping in 454 00:25:05,040 --> 00:25:08,280 Speaker 8: mind their risk return objectives. But it's not the place 455 00:25:08,320 --> 00:25:10,680 Speaker 8: of a global asset manager like us to be able 456 00:25:10,720 --> 00:25:11,920 Speaker 8: to have an opinion on that. 457 00:25:12,680 --> 00:25:16,280 Speaker 4: To learn more about what makes EESG ESG, I called 458 00:25:16,280 --> 00:25:18,840 Speaker 4: an expert who I've spoken to you while on the beat. 459 00:25:19,160 --> 00:25:22,240 Speaker 5: VET told Hennish and I'm Weistein and faculty director of 460 00:25:22,280 --> 00:25:24,720 Speaker 5: the ESG Initiative at the Wharton School, and I'm also 461 00:25:24,760 --> 00:25:26,680 Speaker 5: the Deloitte and Tusche Professor of Management. 462 00:25:27,119 --> 00:25:30,320 Speaker 4: Viz has a similaritate to Nikisa when it comes to 463 00:25:30,359 --> 00:25:33,000 Speaker 4: what factors go into an ESG investment plan. 464 00:25:33,520 --> 00:25:36,760 Speaker 5: ESG is about doing hard financial analysis and it's not 465 00:25:36,880 --> 00:25:41,800 Speaker 5: at all driven by ideology. It's driven by economics. 466 00:25:44,119 --> 00:25:47,720 Speaker 4: He'll study data to try to understand how companies are 467 00:25:47,720 --> 00:25:53,120 Speaker 4: analyzing environmental, social, and governance factors. Then he'll look into 468 00:25:53,160 --> 00:25:57,720 Speaker 4: how those factors might affect a company's bottom line. Here's 469 00:25:57,760 --> 00:26:02,440 Speaker 4: an example. Palmle is a common ingredient found in cosmetic 470 00:26:02,480 --> 00:26:05,960 Speaker 4: products like lipsticks, but it's also leading to a lot 471 00:26:05,960 --> 00:26:07,760 Speaker 4: of deforestation around the world. 472 00:26:08,240 --> 00:26:11,200 Speaker 5: That's just one of many examples. Or an agricultural company 473 00:26:11,400 --> 00:26:15,119 Speaker 5: by changing its mix of supplies, by changing where and 474 00:26:15,160 --> 00:26:18,840 Speaker 5: how it's sourcing, can have an impact on deforestation and 475 00:26:18,960 --> 00:26:22,920 Speaker 5: an impact on clear cutting and other environmentally damaging practices. 476 00:26:23,520 --> 00:26:27,520 Speaker 5: Companies are going to be increasingly pressured to undertake those actions. 477 00:26:27,880 --> 00:26:31,200 Speaker 5: Some companies are head in that transition. Some companies are behind. 478 00:26:31,600 --> 00:26:35,800 Speaker 5: That should be reflected in their valuation. Otherwise, government policy 479 00:26:36,119 --> 00:26:40,240 Speaker 5: or consumer changes in preferences will lead them to be 480 00:26:40,359 --> 00:26:42,800 Speaker 5: forced to make these changes later on when they're more 481 00:26:42,840 --> 00:26:43,640 Speaker 5: expensive to make. 482 00:26:44,200 --> 00:26:47,080 Speaker 4: It's not a short term gain. He's really trying to 483 00:26:47,080 --> 00:26:50,760 Speaker 4: map out how a company's decisions today will affect its 484 00:26:50,800 --> 00:26:51,800 Speaker 4: profits in the future. 485 00:26:52,160 --> 00:26:54,679 Speaker 5: There may be periods of time like twenty twenty two, 486 00:26:54,840 --> 00:26:57,960 Speaker 5: where you outperform the market, but you will underperform over 487 00:26:57,960 --> 00:26:59,840 Speaker 5: the medium to long term. 488 00:27:00,200 --> 00:27:03,680 Speaker 4: Of industry groups report that trillions of dollars are already 489 00:27:03,760 --> 00:27:08,240 Speaker 4: weighing ESG issues to some degree. That's a massive pool 490 00:27:08,240 --> 00:27:11,840 Speaker 4: of capital, and Fitz says it's only going to get bigger. 491 00:27:12,359 --> 00:27:16,720 Speaker 4: But the southern political polarization of ESG worries him. Sure, 492 00:27:17,160 --> 00:27:20,480 Speaker 4: ESU models need work, but he doesn't think that's a 493 00:27:20,560 --> 00:27:23,720 Speaker 4: reason to give up on the strategy or ignore how 494 00:27:23,800 --> 00:27:25,800 Speaker 4: these factors affect the market. 495 00:27:26,200 --> 00:27:29,320 Speaker 5: What I'd point to is the unfair standard they're holding 496 00:27:29,320 --> 00:27:33,240 Speaker 5: the ESG movement to. They say, we haven't built the 497 00:27:33,320 --> 00:27:36,520 Speaker 5: data set yet that can predict future stock market returns, 498 00:27:36,680 --> 00:27:39,480 Speaker 5: that we haven't built the financial model that can predict 499 00:27:39,760 --> 00:27:42,800 Speaker 5: which stock will outperform the others over the next ten years. 500 00:27:43,440 --> 00:27:46,879 Speaker 5: Show me anyone in the financial service space who has 501 00:27:46,920 --> 00:27:49,800 Speaker 5: a data set that can predict which stocks are going 502 00:27:49,840 --> 00:27:54,119 Speaker 5: to outperform the others over the next ten years. Anyone 503 00:27:54,119 --> 00:27:56,560 Speaker 5: who had such a data set would be a billionaire. 504 00:27:57,119 --> 00:28:00,760 Speaker 5: There's a struggle to always, in each market cycle, in 505 00:28:00,800 --> 00:28:03,439 Speaker 5: each month, try to figure out which stocks are going 506 00:28:03,480 --> 00:28:06,000 Speaker 5: to outperform and which art There's. 507 00:28:05,800 --> 00:28:09,000 Speaker 4: So much confusion about what ESG is. It means different 508 00:28:09,000 --> 00:28:13,080 Speaker 4: things to different people. The data is incomplete, it's difficult 509 00:28:13,160 --> 00:28:16,000 Speaker 4: to compare, and overall the field is still a work 510 00:28:16,000 --> 00:28:20,199 Speaker 4: in progress, and even experts acknowledge that ESG analysis is 511 00:28:20,200 --> 00:28:23,560 Speaker 4: still in its infancy. Nikisa says people just have to 512 00:28:23,600 --> 00:28:25,239 Speaker 4: appreciate where the industry is. 513 00:28:25,840 --> 00:28:28,080 Speaker 8: That's the wild wild West that we're still in. 514 00:28:28,840 --> 00:28:32,000 Speaker 4: Nikita also says she doesn't see bias at work in 515 00:28:32,240 --> 00:28:36,040 Speaker 4: ESG analysis. Regardless of how the models are built. 516 00:28:36,080 --> 00:28:39,080 Speaker 8: There is no such thing as a good ESG company 517 00:28:39,440 --> 00:28:42,600 Speaker 8: or a bad ESG company, because you're throwing in three 518 00:28:42,760 --> 00:28:45,920 Speaker 8: very different variables and you're somehow assuming that that is 519 00:28:46,000 --> 00:28:48,640 Speaker 8: going to make some sense. Our job as an investor 520 00:28:48,680 --> 00:28:51,560 Speaker 8: is not to say whether that's good or bad for society. 521 00:28:51,680 --> 00:28:54,800 Speaker 8: It's about saying how does that impact the financial markets. 522 00:28:55,440 --> 00:28:59,880 Speaker 4: Roberts agrees with Nikisa and fits that ESH shouldn't be prescriptive, 523 00:29:00,480 --> 00:29:02,920 Speaker 4: but he thinks that's actually what's happening. 524 00:29:03,480 --> 00:29:06,720 Speaker 2: The Pollyanna and me probably wishes that there could be 525 00:29:06,760 --> 00:29:08,920 Speaker 2: a two part of UHG system. 526 00:29:08,440 --> 00:29:11,800 Speaker 4: And how would that work. We'll take the E for example. 527 00:29:12,360 --> 00:29:15,360 Speaker 2: There are those who just think mining is bad and 528 00:29:15,960 --> 00:29:19,720 Speaker 2: oil production is literally evil and it's killing mother Earth 529 00:29:19,920 --> 00:29:23,440 Speaker 2: and we should stop all drilling period, no matter what 530 00:29:23,480 --> 00:29:27,840 Speaker 2: the costs. The Bible says that we're here. God has 531 00:29:27,880 --> 00:29:32,360 Speaker 2: put us in his earth to exercise his dominion over 532 00:29:32,400 --> 00:29:37,080 Speaker 2: this world. We have a right to extract things from 533 00:29:37,120 --> 00:29:38,920 Speaker 2: the earth. Right we have a right to use the 534 00:29:39,000 --> 00:29:41,280 Speaker 2: resources to benefit mankind. 535 00:29:41,720 --> 00:29:44,520 Speaker 4: Robert's biblical view of mining lines up with a more 536 00:29:44,600 --> 00:29:49,360 Speaker 4: conservative way of thinking. So the conservative ESG system miight 537 00:29:49,440 --> 00:29:52,640 Speaker 4: grade mining companies highly and invest in more of them, 538 00:29:53,160 --> 00:29:56,560 Speaker 4: whereas a liberal EESG system miight grade them poorly and 539 00:29:56,600 --> 00:30:02,240 Speaker 4: not invest one issue cheaper, and two very different approaches. 540 00:30:02,720 --> 00:30:04,560 Speaker 1: Okay, hang on a second, I'm going to butt in 541 00:30:04,600 --> 00:30:08,680 Speaker 1: here again to clarify. Nikita and Vitt are saying that 542 00:30:09,040 --> 00:30:13,520 Speaker 1: ESG is not political and it's not partisan. They say 543 00:30:13,520 --> 00:30:15,560 Speaker 1: they're just looking at data that shows how a company 544 00:30:15,560 --> 00:30:19,680 Speaker 1: will perform in the future depending on how they handle environmental, social, 545 00:30:20,000 --> 00:30:23,760 Speaker 1: and governance factors. But some conservatives think that issues like 546 00:30:23,840 --> 00:30:28,160 Speaker 1: climate change, for instance, are inherently political, even if the 547 00:30:28,240 --> 00:30:31,960 Speaker 1: vast majority of scientists agree that climate change is real. 548 00:30:32,640 --> 00:30:35,680 Speaker 4: Yeah, that's a pretty good summary, tim, And actually there 549 00:30:35,680 --> 00:30:38,360 Speaker 4: may be even more approaches to issue than what I've 550 00:30:38,440 --> 00:30:41,840 Speaker 4: laid out. I spoke to another faith based investor Mark 551 00:30:41,880 --> 00:30:45,360 Speaker 4: Regier who works in Wisconsin, and he has a different 552 00:30:45,400 --> 00:30:47,000 Speaker 4: reading of the Bible than Robert does. 553 00:30:47,560 --> 00:30:50,000 Speaker 5: I make it a rule not to tell anybody what 554 00:30:50,160 --> 00:30:52,400 Speaker 5: Jesus would do, because I don't know. 555 00:30:52,840 --> 00:30:55,520 Speaker 2: That's what makes the difference between somebody who's the son 556 00:30:55,560 --> 00:30:57,240 Speaker 2: of God and somebody who's definitely not. 557 00:30:59,160 --> 00:31:02,040 Speaker 4: Like I said, there's no clear definition of ESG. There's 558 00:31:02,080 --> 00:31:04,560 Speaker 4: lots of different takes on it. It depends on who 559 00:31:04,560 --> 00:31:05,120 Speaker 4: you speak with. 560 00:31:06,080 --> 00:31:08,840 Speaker 1: What a minefield. I want to talk more about this, 561 00:31:08,960 --> 00:31:11,400 Speaker 1: but we have to take an ad break first. We'll 562 00:31:11,400 --> 00:31:21,120 Speaker 1: be right back. Okay, we're back with Sagel Kishan, the 563 00:31:21,480 --> 00:31:25,120 Speaker 1: ESG wizard of Bloomberg News. I've found this whole story 564 00:31:25,160 --> 00:31:29,600 Speaker 1: so fascinating, Sagel, and a lot's gone on since you 565 00:31:29,760 --> 00:31:32,680 Speaker 1: interviewed Robert the last time. Tell me about some of 566 00:31:32,680 --> 00:31:35,320 Speaker 1: the most significant things that have happened within the ESG 567 00:31:35,480 --> 00:31:36,600 Speaker 1: movement during that period. 568 00:31:37,200 --> 00:31:41,080 Speaker 4: Gosh, so much has happens. We've had Ronda Santis Pylon 569 00:31:41,440 --> 00:31:45,520 Speaker 4: An attack EESG. We've had attorney generals across different states 570 00:31:45,920 --> 00:31:50,680 Speaker 4: launch investigations into ESG. We've had billions of dollars pulled 571 00:31:50,720 --> 00:31:53,880 Speaker 4: out of black Rock, Wall Street's biggest champion of ESG 572 00:31:54,840 --> 00:31:58,000 Speaker 4: and plenty of anti ESCH bills being pushed through states. 573 00:31:58,720 --> 00:32:01,040 Speaker 1: You know, it's very interesting to me when these things 574 00:32:01,120 --> 00:32:04,880 Speaker 1: happen in the US, where a momentum comes behind a movement, 575 00:32:04,920 --> 00:32:07,280 Speaker 1: whatever the movement might be. We saw this happening with 576 00:32:07,360 --> 00:32:12,680 Speaker 1: another acronym CRT or critical race theory that invaded the 577 00:32:12,800 --> 00:32:16,120 Speaker 1: discussion of education and what's appropriate for the classroom and 578 00:32:16,160 --> 00:32:19,560 Speaker 1: what isn't it's rare that you get that same phenomenon 579 00:32:19,600 --> 00:32:23,200 Speaker 1: on Wall Street and that it becomes so clearly politicized 580 00:32:23,600 --> 00:32:25,600 Speaker 1: so quickly, And what do you think gave it this 581 00:32:25,680 --> 00:32:28,640 Speaker 1: kind of energy? Like why now? And why has it 582 00:32:28,680 --> 00:32:29,560 Speaker 1: gotten such traction? 583 00:32:30,440 --> 00:32:33,080 Speaker 4: Why now? I mean, the E issue movement, if you 584 00:32:33,120 --> 00:32:37,080 Speaker 4: can call it a movement, has overtaken in some ways 585 00:32:37,240 --> 00:32:40,520 Speaker 4: asset managers and banks. Everybody's been pushing to look at 586 00:32:40,520 --> 00:32:46,040 Speaker 4: things like climate change, c suite diversity, inequalities. 587 00:32:45,360 --> 00:32:47,960 Speaker 1: The composition of boards exactly exactly. 588 00:32:48,400 --> 00:32:51,200 Speaker 4: And so that's why we've had this big pushback because 589 00:32:51,280 --> 00:32:53,320 Speaker 4: Wall Street has gone big on this in the last 590 00:32:53,360 --> 00:32:54,240 Speaker 4: three years. 591 00:32:54,080 --> 00:32:57,480 Speaker 1: And is that pure lunacy. Has Wall Street gone off 592 00:32:57,480 --> 00:33:01,160 Speaker 1: its rocker that it's now actually trying to embrace things 593 00:33:01,280 --> 00:33:07,000 Speaker 1: like climate change, or corporate diversity or boardroom diversity. I mean, 594 00:33:07,040 --> 00:33:10,760 Speaker 1: clearly its critics think it has and they're painting it 595 00:33:10,800 --> 00:33:13,920 Speaker 1: as dangerous, but just trying to step back for our 596 00:33:13,960 --> 00:33:16,920 Speaker 1: listeners a little bit. As someone who watches Wall Street 597 00:33:17,000 --> 00:33:21,520 Speaker 1: as a sophisticated observer, as a very numerous, sophisticated observer, 598 00:33:22,320 --> 00:33:25,520 Speaker 1: do you think this is a threat to the foundations 599 00:33:25,720 --> 00:33:28,400 Speaker 1: of American finance and the roots of Wall Street. 600 00:33:28,920 --> 00:33:33,320 Speaker 4: It's funny that you say that, because progressives who are 601 00:33:33,800 --> 00:33:36,400 Speaker 4: trying to push and act on things like climate change 602 00:33:36,440 --> 00:33:40,800 Speaker 4: and inequalities in society, they don't feel that capital markets 603 00:33:41,280 --> 00:33:44,920 Speaker 4: corporations are doing enough. In fact, they think it's something 604 00:33:44,920 --> 00:33:48,840 Speaker 4: called greenwashing, where a company saying they're doing good things, 605 00:33:49,080 --> 00:33:52,719 Speaker 4: but really they're not. So it's been pushed and pulled 606 00:33:52,760 --> 00:33:54,440 Speaker 4: from both sides at the moment. 607 00:33:54,520 --> 00:33:56,200 Speaker 1: And that critique from the left is you actually are 608 00:33:56,200 --> 00:33:58,440 Speaker 1: not putting your money where your mouth is, exactly, and 609 00:33:58,480 --> 00:34:00,840 Speaker 1: now you have Wall Street step being up or at 610 00:34:00,880 --> 00:34:03,080 Speaker 1: least attempting to to put its money where its mouth is. 611 00:34:03,520 --> 00:34:06,000 Speaker 1: The left says it's not enough money, and the right 612 00:34:06,040 --> 00:34:10,680 Speaker 1: saying watch your mouth. And caught in the middle are 613 00:34:10,800 --> 00:34:15,360 Speaker 1: essentially money managers trying to figure out both profitable ways 614 00:34:15,400 --> 00:34:19,839 Speaker 1: to invest and socially responsible ways to invest in hence 615 00:34:19,880 --> 00:34:21,000 Speaker 1: a firestorm. 616 00:34:21,520 --> 00:34:23,640 Speaker 4: Absolutely, by the end of the day, Wall Street is 617 00:34:23,680 --> 00:34:27,120 Speaker 4: about making money. They're doing this to generate fees, to 618 00:34:27,200 --> 00:34:31,600 Speaker 4: generate revenue, but the antiesh backlash is actually now sent 619 00:34:31,719 --> 00:34:34,839 Speaker 4: a chill down Wall Street's spine. We've seen a lot 620 00:34:34,960 --> 00:34:38,479 Speaker 4: of banks, a lot of investors who two years ago 621 00:34:38,880 --> 00:34:42,759 Speaker 4: would wax lyrical about climate change and sea suit diversity. 622 00:34:43,520 --> 00:34:45,120 Speaker 4: Now they've gone on the down load. 623 00:34:45,480 --> 00:34:48,879 Speaker 1: And is that because they see reputational risk baked into 624 00:34:48,920 --> 00:34:50,600 Speaker 1: that that at the end of the day they're saying 625 00:34:50,600 --> 00:34:54,080 Speaker 1: to themselves it might be socially responsible, we even might 626 00:34:54,120 --> 00:34:58,640 Speaker 1: make money off of this, but this sort of firestorm 627 00:34:58,680 --> 00:35:01,399 Speaker 1: of criticism we're getting doesn't make it worth it, because 628 00:35:01,400 --> 00:35:02,960 Speaker 1: we might lose business in the long run. 629 00:35:03,239 --> 00:35:06,439 Speaker 4: Absolutely, I mean Larry Think, the chief of Black Rock, 630 00:35:06,920 --> 00:35:10,840 Speaker 4: he's really been attacked in many ways by the Republicans. 631 00:35:10,600 --> 00:35:12,120 Speaker 1: And deeply personally attacked. 632 00:35:12,200 --> 00:35:13,920 Speaker 4: Absolutely, they've really called him. 633 00:35:13,760 --> 00:35:16,919 Speaker 1: On billboards anti semitism. 634 00:35:16,520 --> 00:35:20,040 Speaker 4: And so he's had to then tone down his rhetoric 635 00:35:20,080 --> 00:35:22,719 Speaker 4: on climate change. And last year he went down to 636 00:35:22,760 --> 00:35:26,239 Speaker 4: Texas to even meet all executives who explain to them 637 00:35:26,400 --> 00:35:29,760 Speaker 4: the energy transition and they need to shift to cleaner fuels. 638 00:35:30,280 --> 00:35:33,000 Speaker 4: But the atacks on him and the company have been 639 00:35:33,200 --> 00:35:36,080 Speaker 4: pretty relentless, and that's why a lot of other companies 640 00:35:36,120 --> 00:35:38,680 Speaker 4: have kind of duck for cover and they're really toning 641 00:35:38,760 --> 00:35:42,880 Speaker 4: down what they're saying about climate change in particular. And 642 00:35:42,960 --> 00:35:46,440 Speaker 4: on top of that, we've had Attorney general's launch investigations 643 00:35:47,200 --> 00:35:49,760 Speaker 4: looking at the legal ease in many of the efforts 644 00:35:49,760 --> 00:35:51,360 Speaker 4: that Wall Street are doing when it comes to the 645 00:35:51,440 --> 00:35:56,080 Speaker 4: energy transition. So yeah, everybody's really looking at their marketing documents, 646 00:35:56,120 --> 00:35:58,520 Speaker 4: their pitch books, making sure that they have all their 647 00:35:58,600 --> 00:35:59,239 Speaker 4: ducks lined up. 648 00:35:59,800 --> 00:36:02,840 Speaker 1: I guess so as we both know, no one really 649 00:36:02,880 --> 00:36:04,960 Speaker 1: has all their ducks lined up, no matter what they're doing, 650 00:36:04,960 --> 00:36:09,800 Speaker 1: whether they're investor, a corporate manager, a parent, or a teacher. 651 00:36:10,239 --> 00:36:12,160 Speaker 1: I think one of the things I wonder about in 652 00:36:12,200 --> 00:36:15,279 Speaker 1: all this is if there is a consensus, a scientific 653 00:36:15,320 --> 00:36:18,759 Speaker 1: consensus that climate change might be a problem. I think 654 00:36:18,760 --> 00:36:22,520 Speaker 1: there's definitely a social consensus that people should not be 655 00:36:22,600 --> 00:36:27,080 Speaker 1: discriminated against for leadership positions in politics or in corporate 656 00:36:27,120 --> 00:36:30,279 Speaker 1: America simply because they're a woman, or because they're a 657 00:36:30,280 --> 00:36:34,000 Speaker 1: person of color or have a different ethnic background. If 658 00:36:34,040 --> 00:36:38,760 Speaker 1: we're forestalling putting money behind these kinds of efforts based 659 00:36:38,800 --> 00:36:43,120 Speaker 1: on bad information and it runs against both scientific information 660 00:36:43,520 --> 00:36:46,760 Speaker 1: and broadly held social values, we're getting into a pretty 661 00:36:46,760 --> 00:36:49,440 Speaker 1: problematic place, aren't we, in terms of being able to 662 00:36:49,880 --> 00:36:52,520 Speaker 1: take the necessary action we need to solve problems. 663 00:36:52,600 --> 00:36:52,680 Speaker 2: No. 664 00:36:52,800 --> 00:36:55,560 Speaker 4: Absolutely, But to people on the right, a lot of 665 00:36:55,600 --> 00:37:01,880 Speaker 4: diversity initiatives smacks of affirmative action of quote, and historically 666 00:37:01,920 --> 00:37:03,000 Speaker 4: they've hated all of that. 667 00:37:03,680 --> 00:37:05,040 Speaker 1: Yeah, I wonder how many of those people on the 668 00:37:05,080 --> 00:37:08,520 Speaker 1: right come from lots of different countries historically and have 669 00:37:08,640 --> 00:37:11,399 Speaker 1: lots of different backgrounds, and now they kind of want 670 00:37:11,480 --> 00:37:14,000 Speaker 1: just one thing. But that's probably for a different podcast. 671 00:37:14,280 --> 00:37:17,120 Speaker 1: I want to come back to money in ESG here. 672 00:37:17,320 --> 00:37:20,800 Speaker 1: I also think it's useful to frame exactly how vast 673 00:37:21,000 --> 00:37:25,319 Speaker 1: the ESG realm is, because most money invested in Wall 674 00:37:25,320 --> 00:37:28,919 Speaker 1: Street is still invested the old fashioned way. People try 675 00:37:28,960 --> 00:37:34,120 Speaker 1: to find either growth opportunities or undervalued companies and create 676 00:37:34,160 --> 00:37:37,760 Speaker 1: a calculus that will result in a profitable payoff somewhere 677 00:37:37,800 --> 00:37:42,360 Speaker 1: down the road. How big actually is the ESG universe 678 00:37:42,440 --> 00:37:45,360 Speaker 1: right now in terms of what percentage of assets on 679 00:37:45,400 --> 00:37:46,719 Speaker 1: Wall Street flow towards it. 680 00:37:47,120 --> 00:37:49,759 Speaker 4: Well, it's certainly not a majority of the assets. It's 681 00:37:49,760 --> 00:37:52,719 Speaker 4: probably less than ten, if not five percent of the assets. 682 00:37:53,360 --> 00:37:57,480 Speaker 4: But ESG investors they have said, like trillions is involved 683 00:37:57,520 --> 00:38:00,839 Speaker 4: in ESG. But what's happening now because of concerns of 684 00:38:00,920 --> 00:38:05,440 Speaker 4: greenwashing when people exaggerate their environmental claims, we're seeing a 685 00:38:05,480 --> 00:38:09,080 Speaker 4: sort of shrinkage going on both in Europe and the US. 686 00:38:09,480 --> 00:38:11,400 Speaker 4: So the numbers are in flux at the moment. 687 00:38:12,239 --> 00:38:15,400 Speaker 1: So from where you sit, do you think this means 688 00:38:15,400 --> 00:38:17,880 Speaker 1: that the SG movement is going to run out of steam? 689 00:38:18,480 --> 00:38:21,799 Speaker 1: Does it die? Does it get repackaged with different initials 690 00:38:21,840 --> 00:38:23,960 Speaker 1: and sort of sneak past its critics? How does this 691 00:38:24,040 --> 00:38:25,000 Speaker 1: play out? 692 00:38:25,280 --> 00:38:27,400 Speaker 4: There are even people within the ESG who want to 693 00:38:27,440 --> 00:38:29,759 Speaker 4: get rid of the acronym altogether because of all the 694 00:38:29,760 --> 00:38:32,920 Speaker 4: bad press in the past year. They're thinking of more 695 00:38:33,000 --> 00:38:38,480 Speaker 4: mundane labels like sustainable investing or de risking or material 696 00:38:38,600 --> 00:38:41,879 Speaker 4: risk factors, which they don't really excite people, but that's 697 00:38:41,920 --> 00:38:43,080 Speaker 4: really what the issue is. 698 00:38:43,200 --> 00:38:45,279 Speaker 1: Maybe they could call it save the planet so your 699 00:38:45,280 --> 00:38:47,799 Speaker 1: grandchildren can still live on it, but that's too long 700 00:38:47,840 --> 00:38:49,520 Speaker 1: for an investment them, isn't it. 701 00:38:50,320 --> 00:38:54,920 Speaker 4: But despite the malaise, we're not really seeing companies or banks, 702 00:38:55,440 --> 00:38:57,480 Speaker 4: even though they're being less vocal about it, they're still 703 00:38:57,520 --> 00:39:01,600 Speaker 4: pushing on behind the scenes on man these initiatives, something 704 00:39:01,640 --> 00:39:04,920 Speaker 4: called green hushing, where you don't talk about your green 705 00:39:04,960 --> 00:39:08,759 Speaker 4: activities but you do it anyway, but you do it anyway. Yeah, 706 00:39:09,560 --> 00:39:12,160 Speaker 4: this backlash isn't going to go away. There's gonna be 707 00:39:12,160 --> 00:39:14,759 Speaker 4: ebbs and flows. But we've got the elections next year. 708 00:39:15,440 --> 00:39:18,600 Speaker 4: We've got some of the candidates riding on anti woke tickets, 709 00:39:18,840 --> 00:39:22,480 Speaker 4: Rando Sentis and another one, Vivek Ramaswami. 710 00:39:22,600 --> 00:39:23,360 Speaker 1: Uh huh yeah. 711 00:39:23,960 --> 00:39:26,520 Speaker 4: So yeah, it's going to continue to be bashed. 712 00:39:27,080 --> 00:39:29,840 Speaker 1: Okay, So Joe, I don't let anybody escape this show 713 00:39:30,200 --> 00:39:34,680 Speaker 1: without sharing with our listeners what they've learned, that little 714 00:39:34,719 --> 00:39:39,040 Speaker 1: aha that they've discovered by examining the subject we're talking about. So, 715 00:39:39,120 --> 00:39:43,520 Speaker 1: what have you learned about ESG and the anti ESG 716 00:39:43,760 --> 00:39:47,680 Speaker 1: movement that you didn't know before you began talking to 717 00:39:47,760 --> 00:39:49,680 Speaker 1: Robert Netsley and others. 718 00:39:50,920 --> 00:39:54,719 Speaker 4: I guess maybe this is naive of me. But in Europe, 719 00:39:55,000 --> 00:39:57,920 Speaker 4: in other parts of the world, there isn't this backlash. 720 00:39:58,040 --> 00:40:01,640 Speaker 4: It's only in America where this backlash. So I've been 721 00:40:01,680 --> 00:40:06,920 Speaker 4: surprised by the pushback by the rights on an investment 722 00:40:06,920 --> 00:40:09,200 Speaker 4: strategy that people on the left are saying is not 723 00:40:09,280 --> 00:40:13,719 Speaker 4: really doing much. What I've learned things aren't so black 724 00:40:13,719 --> 00:40:14,960 Speaker 4: and white. 725 00:40:15,000 --> 00:40:18,240 Speaker 1: They never are. Thank you for joining us today. 726 00:40:18,560 --> 00:40:19,800 Speaker 4: Thank you. 727 00:40:19,800 --> 00:40:23,800 Speaker 1: You can find Segel Kishan's reporting on Bloomberg dot com 728 00:40:23,840 --> 00:40:26,560 Speaker 1: and if you want to become a subscriber the Bloomberg 729 00:40:26,640 --> 00:40:30,319 Speaker 1: terminal here at crash Course. We believe the collisions can 730 00:40:30,360 --> 00:40:35,280 Speaker 1: be messy, impressive, challenging, surprising, and always instructive. In today's 731 00:40:35,280 --> 00:40:38,560 Speaker 1: Crash Course, I learned that there are many ways to 732 00:40:38,600 --> 00:40:41,480 Speaker 1: skin the cat when you're talking about what is and 733 00:40:41,760 --> 00:40:46,040 Speaker 1: isn't a value based investment strategy. What did you learn? 734 00:40:46,640 --> 00:40:48,640 Speaker 1: We'd love to hear from you. You can tweet at 735 00:40:48,640 --> 00:40:52,160 Speaker 1: the Bloomberg Opinion handle at Opinion or me at Tim 736 00:40:52,160 --> 00:40:56,279 Speaker 1: O'Brien using the hashtag Bloomberg Crash Course. You can also 737 00:40:56,320 --> 00:40:59,400 Speaker 1: subscribe to our show wherever you're listening right now and 738 00:40:59,480 --> 00:41:02,080 Speaker 1: leave us a room. It helps more people find the show. 739 00:41:03,040 --> 00:41:07,759 Speaker 1: This episode was produced by the indispensable Annamazarakis, Moses on 740 00:41:07,920 --> 00:41:11,880 Speaker 1: Dam and Me. Our supervising producer is Magnus Hendrickson, and 741 00:41:11,920 --> 00:41:15,799 Speaker 1: we had editing help from Sage Bauman, Katie Boyce, Jeff Grocott, 742 00:41:16,200 --> 00:41:20,400 Speaker 1: Mike Nitza and Christine Vanden Bilart. Blake Maples does our 743 00:41:20,440 --> 00:41:23,640 Speaker 1: sound engineering and our original theme song was composed by 744 00:41:23,719 --> 00:41:27,840 Speaker 1: Luis Gara. I'm Tim O'Brien. We'll be back next week 745 00:41:27,960 --> 00:41:29,080 Speaker 1: with another crash course