WEBVTT - Bitcoin Sinks Deeper Below $100,000 as Bear Market Grips Crypto

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News. This is Bloomberg business

0:00:10.520 --> 0:00:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Weekdaily reporting from the magazine that helps global leaders stay

0:00:14.680 --> 0:00:18.759
<v Speaker 1>ahead with insight on the people, companies, and trends shaping

0:00:18.800 --> 0:00:23.720
<v Speaker 1>today's complex economy. Plus global business finance and tech news

0:00:23.760 --> 0:00:27.720
<v Speaker 1>as it happens. The Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast with

0:00:27.920 --> 0:00:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Carol Masser and Tim Stenebek on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:32.120 --> 0:00:35.200
<v Speaker 2>Lots of news in crypto today, Gray Scale Investments filed

0:00:35.200 --> 0:00:38.080
<v Speaker 2>publicly for an IPO. It's the latest crypto link company

0:00:38.120 --> 0:00:41.360
<v Speaker 2>to test public markets under an administration more open to

0:00:41.479 --> 0:00:45.320
<v Speaker 2>digital assets from one on crypto and bitcoin and bitcoin

0:00:45.400 --> 0:00:48.320
<v Speaker 2>mining specifically joining us now and aam familiar to our audience.

0:00:48.440 --> 0:00:51.120
<v Speaker 2>Eric Trump is the co founder and chief strategy officer

0:00:51.159 --> 0:00:53.800
<v Speaker 2>of American Bitcoin. It's a publicly traded bitcoin mining and

0:00:53.840 --> 0:00:56.520
<v Speaker 2>treasury company. It's got a market cap around four point

0:00:56.560 --> 0:00:59.920
<v Speaker 2>four billion dollars. The company started trading on the Nasdaq

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:03.440
<v Speaker 2>back on September third, when it merged with a microcap shares.

0:01:03.480 --> 0:01:05.479
<v Speaker 2>It a high on September ninth. They're down around forty

0:01:05.480 --> 0:01:08.640
<v Speaker 2>seven percent since then. Eric, of course, also the executive

0:01:08.680 --> 0:01:12.280
<v Speaker 2>vice president of the Trump Organization. He joins US from Florida. Eric,

0:01:12.280 --> 0:01:14.200
<v Speaker 2>Good to have you on the program again. How are

0:01:14.200 --> 0:01:15.440
<v Speaker 2>you guys?

0:01:15.520 --> 0:01:15.960
<v Speaker 3>Great to be on.

0:01:16.560 --> 0:01:20.600
<v Speaker 2>So if somebody wants exposure to bitcoin, why would they

0:01:20.640 --> 0:01:24.160
<v Speaker 2>do that through American Bitcoin rather than just buying bitcoin

0:01:24.200 --> 0:01:27.000
<v Speaker 2>out right on an exchange or even through an ETF.

0:01:27.880 --> 0:01:30.120
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's a great question. And maybe you go out

0:01:30.120 --> 0:01:32.120
<v Speaker 4>and you buy bitcoin on ETF or you buy it

0:01:32.160 --> 0:01:34.679
<v Speaker 4>an exchange. You kind of have one to one bitcoin.

0:01:34.760 --> 0:01:36.560
<v Speaker 4>Right you go out and you buy one bitcoin, you're

0:01:36.600 --> 0:01:39.560
<v Speaker 4>always going to have one bigcoin. Our entire ethos is

0:01:39.600 --> 0:01:43.520
<v Speaker 4>increasing bigcoin per share right now, every day we're mining bitcoin,

0:01:43.600 --> 0:01:46.320
<v Speaker 4>we're miney bitcoin at at roughly fifty percent of Spot

0:01:46.319 --> 0:01:49.160
<v Speaker 4>prices a bitcoin, so roughly about fifty six thousand dollars

0:01:49.560 --> 0:01:51.520
<v Speaker 4>per bitcoin. That's what we're able to mine in. We're

0:01:51.560 --> 0:01:53.480
<v Speaker 4>able to mind because we have the best facilities anywhere

0:01:53.480 --> 0:01:56.720
<v Speaker 4>on Earth. We've got some of the cheapest energy anywhere

0:01:56.720 --> 0:01:58.320
<v Speaker 4>on Earth. We do it in America, we do it

0:01:58.520 --> 0:02:01.120
<v Speaker 4>in West Texas. Right now, our average costs to produce

0:02:01.120 --> 0:02:03.240
<v Speaker 4>a bitcoin is roughly fifty six thousand dollars, and we're

0:02:03.240 --> 0:02:05.360
<v Speaker 4>mining bitcoin twenty four hours a day, seven days a week.

0:02:05.720 --> 0:02:08.320
<v Speaker 4>By doing that, you're able to increase bitcoin per share, right,

0:02:08.360 --> 0:02:11.320
<v Speaker 4>and that's the ultimate metric that we chase every single day.

0:02:11.680 --> 0:02:13.960
<v Speaker 4>How do you increase the amount of bitcoin you have

0:02:14.080 --> 0:02:16.400
<v Speaker 4>per share you have of stock? And I think we

0:02:16.400 --> 0:02:18.000
<v Speaker 4>can do that clearly. If you go buy on a

0:02:18.000 --> 0:02:20.600
<v Speaker 4>one to one basis, you don't have that ability to do.

0:02:20.680 --> 0:02:22.799
<v Speaker 4>And that's the one metric that we track every single day,

0:02:22.840 --> 0:02:24.639
<v Speaker 4>and that's the one metric that we try and improve

0:02:24.720 --> 0:02:27.000
<v Speaker 4>every single day. And we've done all hung job, guys,

0:02:27.040 --> 0:02:29.239
<v Speaker 4>I mean we you know, this public was founded on

0:02:29.480 --> 0:02:33.520
<v Speaker 4>March thirteenth, I'm sorry, March thirty first, roughly five months later,

0:02:33.639 --> 0:02:35.200
<v Speaker 4>five months and three days to be exact, we were

0:02:35.200 --> 0:02:36.880
<v Speaker 4>listed on the NASDAC under ABTC.

0:02:37.560 --> 0:02:38.840
<v Speaker 3>We're less than three.

0:02:38.600 --> 0:02:41.480
<v Speaker 4>Months old having been listed, and we're already well sour

0:02:41.560 --> 0:02:45.160
<v Speaker 4>past four thousand bitcoin that have either mined or that

0:02:45.200 --> 0:02:49.160
<v Speaker 4>we've accumulated, making us the twenty fifth largest BTC public

0:02:49.200 --> 0:02:53.720
<v Speaker 4>treasury company in the world, and we're climbing that ladder

0:02:53.800 --> 0:02:55.960
<v Speaker 4>very quickly every single day. So I couldn't be more

0:02:55.960 --> 0:02:58.080
<v Speaker 4>proud of what we've been able to accomplish. And you know,

0:02:58.360 --> 0:03:00.360
<v Speaker 4>everything they do said, I think you mentioned four billion

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:03.959
<v Speaker 4>dollar market cap and again, we've been listed for less

0:03:04.000 --> 0:03:07.160
<v Speaker 4>than three months and growing, you know, growing by by,

0:03:07.360 --> 0:03:08.919
<v Speaker 4>you know, kind of with lightning speed.

0:03:09.120 --> 0:03:12.080
<v Speaker 2>You mentioned the cheapest source of energy in mining that bitcoin.

0:03:12.160 --> 0:03:14.520
<v Speaker 2>Last time we spoke back in September, we had a

0:03:14.520 --> 0:03:17.520
<v Speaker 2>discussion about wind energy that that powers some of this mining.

0:03:18.080 --> 0:03:21.440
<v Speaker 2>Is it still wind that's powering the mining operations for

0:03:21.440 --> 0:03:22.240
<v Speaker 2>American bitcoin?

0:03:23.840 --> 0:03:26.160
<v Speaker 4>There's different sources, but certainly when there was a defunct

0:03:26.160 --> 0:03:28.640
<v Speaker 4>wind farm, you know, the guys over at HOWT eight,

0:03:28.720 --> 0:03:31.000
<v Speaker 4>which our sister company, were able to lock into incredibly

0:03:31.080 --> 0:03:33.880
<v Speaker 4>cheap energy because frankly, it wasn't being utilized, because it

0:03:33.919 --> 0:03:36.440
<v Speaker 4>wasn't being pumped at the grid and lock into a

0:03:36.520 --> 0:03:38.280
<v Speaker 4>very cheap contract for a very long period of time.

0:03:38.320 --> 0:03:41.720
<v Speaker 4>And so we've got unbelievable renewable energy that we're using

0:03:41.720 --> 0:03:44.080
<v Speaker 4>to mine our our our bitcoin. But you can see

0:03:44.080 --> 0:03:45.200
<v Speaker 4>a lot of other energy sources.

0:03:45.240 --> 0:03:45.440
<v Speaker 3>Come on.

0:03:45.520 --> 0:03:48.120
<v Speaker 4>I mean, we're on the the energy revolution in this country.

0:03:48.160 --> 0:03:49.600
<v Speaker 4>I think you guys know that better than anybody. Look

0:03:49.600 --> 0:03:52.560
<v Speaker 4>at oil, looking gas, you know, the policies are working.

0:03:53.000 --> 0:03:55.560
<v Speaker 4>Look at these SMRs, look at you know kind of

0:03:55.560 --> 0:03:56.800
<v Speaker 4>fusion reactions.

0:03:56.840 --> 0:04:00.280
<v Speaker 5>Well, well wait a minute, Eric, because SMRs, I mean

0:04:00.680 --> 0:04:03.600
<v Speaker 5>we do know. We're on it every day, and these

0:04:03.600 --> 0:04:06.480
<v Speaker 5>small modular reactors, none of them are up and running.

0:04:06.520 --> 0:04:08.640
<v Speaker 5>And anybody we talk to you who understands the nuclear

0:04:08.680 --> 0:04:11.280
<v Speaker 5>industry says it it'll take a few years to get

0:04:11.280 --> 0:04:12.000
<v Speaker 5>them up and running.

0:04:12.120 --> 0:04:15.000
<v Speaker 4>You go, oh, guys, absolutely, don't. Don't think that I'm

0:04:15.040 --> 0:04:16.680
<v Speaker 4>saying that they're up and running by by any means.

0:04:16.680 --> 0:04:19.400
<v Speaker 4>What I'm saying is we're in the heyday, you know,

0:04:19.680 --> 0:04:22.000
<v Speaker 4>of power and power exploration in this country right now.

0:04:22.000 --> 0:04:24.120
<v Speaker 4>You have an administration that's held bent on on making

0:04:24.160 --> 0:04:27.960
<v Speaker 4>sure you know, this country has incredibly cheap power.

0:04:28.160 --> 0:04:29.520
<v Speaker 3>Well, that's really interesting.

0:04:29.600 --> 0:04:31.760
<v Speaker 5>Let me just jump in there, because we've done a

0:04:31.800 --> 0:04:35.800
<v Speaker 5>deep analysis into the cost of electricity in twenty twenty five.

0:04:35.839 --> 0:04:38.279
<v Speaker 5>Electricity cost a pen far more on where you're located,

0:04:38.279 --> 0:04:40.039
<v Speaker 5>and a lot of it has to do with the

0:04:40.120 --> 0:04:43.800
<v Speaker 5>AI build out and the cost of those data centers

0:04:43.839 --> 0:04:46.320
<v Speaker 5>and tapping into the networks. You talk about Texas, I'm

0:04:46.360 --> 0:04:49.480
<v Speaker 5>curious what you're paying per megawat an hour in Houston

0:04:49.600 --> 0:04:53.040
<v Speaker 5>right now. It's twenty five dollars. It has gone up

0:04:53.040 --> 0:04:55.080
<v Speaker 5>a lot since twenty twenty. If you go back to

0:04:55.120 --> 0:04:58.480
<v Speaker 5>twenty twenty, it was seventeen dollars per hour. I mean,

0:04:59.000 --> 0:05:01.240
<v Speaker 5>you know, those elections. I don't want to get political,

0:05:01.279 --> 0:05:04.279
<v Speaker 5>but those elections. I mean part of it was electricity

0:05:04.360 --> 0:05:07.000
<v Speaker 5>prices that people Americans have had enough.

0:05:08.440 --> 0:05:11.280
<v Speaker 4>Caroly, you can't be serious, and honestly, I don't want

0:05:11.320 --> 0:05:13.160
<v Speaker 4>to argue on Bloomberg. It's not what I came here

0:05:13.200 --> 0:05:14.599
<v Speaker 4>to do. I've got plenty of things to do in

0:05:14.880 --> 0:05:17.719
<v Speaker 4>my daily life. You had the last administration that had

0:05:17.760 --> 0:05:19.440
<v Speaker 4>the greatest war on energy that we've ever seen in

0:05:19.480 --> 0:05:22.039
<v Speaker 4>the country. Right You had an administration that was literally

0:05:22.080 --> 0:05:24.840
<v Speaker 4>shutting down oiling gas exploration daily.

0:05:25.760 --> 0:05:27.080
<v Speaker 3>They were shutting it down daily.

0:05:27.480 --> 0:05:31.480
<v Speaker 4>They were cutting every pipeline, they were stopping every pipeline

0:05:31.480 --> 0:05:33.880
<v Speaker 4>from being built. I mean, which ones do you want

0:05:33.880 --> 0:05:35.240
<v Speaker 4>me to name? I could go through a list of

0:05:35.320 --> 0:05:38.720
<v Speaker 4>fifteen of them. In fact, it was Joe Biden's first

0:05:38.760 --> 0:05:42.560
<v Speaker 4>executive order to shut down the Keystone Pipeline. They shut

0:05:42.600 --> 0:05:46.560
<v Speaker 4>down all permitting, they shut down all transmission of oiling gas.

0:05:46.880 --> 0:05:49.320
<v Speaker 4>There was a war on energy in this country the

0:05:49.480 --> 0:05:52.320
<v Speaker 4>likes of which you've never seen before. You know, we

0:05:52.360 --> 0:05:54.920
<v Speaker 4>went from being energy independent under my father, where we're

0:05:54.920 --> 0:05:57.760
<v Speaker 4>exporting energy to countries all around the world to being

0:05:57.880 --> 0:06:03.159
<v Speaker 4>energy dependent under Joe don't even don't even try and say,

0:06:03.880 --> 0:06:06.640
<v Speaker 4>you know that we're not seeking the lowest cost energies.

0:06:07.000 --> 0:06:09.159
<v Speaker 4>They had power plants that they were trying to build

0:06:09.160 --> 0:06:11.880
<v Speaker 4>for a fifteen year period of time, nuclear power plants,

0:06:12.160 --> 0:06:13.919
<v Speaker 4>and guess what at the end of them, Joe Biden's

0:06:13.920 --> 0:06:16.960
<v Speaker 4>administration would turn them down and deny them the permits

0:06:16.960 --> 0:06:20.240
<v Speaker 4>for nuclear energy. Right, my father is hell bent on

0:06:20.279 --> 0:06:22.960
<v Speaker 4>making this country energy And the reason, hold on, please

0:06:23.000 --> 0:06:23.560
<v Speaker 4>let me finish.

0:06:23.800 --> 0:06:25.839
<v Speaker 3>The reason he's hell bent on it is if you track.

0:06:25.720 --> 0:06:31.280
<v Speaker 4>GDP, any GDP growth around the world, and you directly

0:06:31.360 --> 0:06:35.080
<v Speaker 4>correlate that with energy costs, they're one hundred percent correlated.

0:06:35.480 --> 0:06:38.520
<v Speaker 4>The lower your energy costs are for production of energy,

0:06:38.880 --> 0:06:42.200
<v Speaker 4>the higher your GDP costs are. We have to win

0:06:42.279 --> 0:06:44.880
<v Speaker 4>the war on cryptocurrency, we have to win the war

0:06:45.560 --> 0:06:48.680
<v Speaker 4>on AI. We have to win these for our national security.

0:06:48.720 --> 0:06:51.000
<v Speaker 4>We have to win these because we're the United States

0:06:51.000 --> 0:06:53.160
<v Speaker 4>of America and we're the number one superpower.

0:06:53.200 --> 0:06:54.039
<v Speaker 3>We must lead the way.

0:06:54.440 --> 0:06:57.320
<v Speaker 4>We need energy generation and my father is hell bent

0:06:57.360 --> 0:06:59.919
<v Speaker 4>of getting that through every single form, whether it's an

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:04.120
<v Speaker 4>actual gas and we're drilling, remember the slow and we're

0:07:04.200 --> 0:07:07.559
<v Speaker 4>drilling again and we're exploring again, Eric, and nuclear power

0:07:07.560 --> 0:07:10.960
<v Speaker 4>plants are getting permits again, which was not happening other

0:07:11.280 --> 0:07:14.040
<v Speaker 4>So please don't, please, please don't talk to me about affordability.

0:07:14.080 --> 0:07:16.480
<v Speaker 4>When you had an administration, they did everything they could the

0:07:16.560 --> 0:07:19.840
<v Speaker 4>cross energy prices for a four year period of time.

0:07:20.160 --> 0:07:23.000
<v Speaker 5>Eric, I respect your position and opinion on this, but

0:07:23.040 --> 0:07:24.840
<v Speaker 5>I also will say that you know, the US is

0:07:24.880 --> 0:07:27.760
<v Speaker 5>the largest oil producer that's out there. I want to

0:07:27.800 --> 0:07:30.880
<v Speaker 5>go back to your company because on mining, we learned

0:07:30.920 --> 0:07:34.200
<v Speaker 5>today that bitfarms it's one of the largest cryptocurrency miners.

0:07:34.240 --> 0:07:36.400
<v Speaker 5>Set of plans to wind down those operations over the

0:07:36.400 --> 0:07:40.240
<v Speaker 5>next two years, focus on providing infrastructure to generate power

0:07:40.240 --> 0:07:44.480
<v Speaker 5>for artificial intelligence applications. We continue to see that a

0:07:44.520 --> 0:07:48.240
<v Speaker 5>growing list of bitcoin miners are pivoting to AI and

0:07:48.320 --> 0:07:52.240
<v Speaker 5>high performance compute services as profit margin shrink due in

0:07:52.320 --> 0:07:55.920
<v Speaker 5>part to those falling prices of the tokens are the

0:07:56.040 --> 0:07:56.800
<v Speaker 5>digital tokens that.

0:07:56.800 --> 0:07:57.200
<v Speaker 6>Are out there?

0:07:57.200 --> 0:08:00.280
<v Speaker 5>Do you have any plans for American bitcoin to pivot

0:08:00.320 --> 0:08:02.880
<v Speaker 5>away from bitcoin mining into artificial intelligence?

0:08:03.680 --> 0:08:05.600
<v Speaker 4>Now the exact opposite. We're only going to ramp up.

0:08:06.440 --> 0:08:08.560
<v Speaker 4>We're going to ramp up every single day. I mean, Carol,

0:08:08.600 --> 0:08:10.800
<v Speaker 4>you mentioned following prices. Let me just kind of hit

0:08:10.840 --> 0:08:13.320
<v Speaker 4>on this one for you. You know, guess what biitcoin

0:08:13.360 --> 0:08:16.680
<v Speaker 4>prices were exactly two years ago from today. I'll tell

0:08:16.720 --> 0:08:19.000
<v Speaker 4>you because you would know, thirty six thousand, five hundred

0:08:19.000 --> 0:08:21.080
<v Speaker 4>was the cost of a bigcoin two years ago. We

0:08:21.120 --> 0:08:24.080
<v Speaker 4>are up one hundred and eighty percent in a twenty

0:08:24.120 --> 0:08:28.680
<v Speaker 4>four month period the spot price of BTC. It's probably

0:08:28.720 --> 0:08:31.760
<v Speaker 4>the number one performing asset you know, of any asset.

0:08:31.840 --> 0:08:33.080
<v Speaker 3>And this is this coming.

0:08:32.840 --> 0:08:35.000
<v Speaker 4>From a guy who believes in hard assets, right. I mean,

0:08:35.400 --> 0:08:37.080
<v Speaker 4>I run one of the great real estate portfolio is

0:08:37.040 --> 0:08:41.640
<v Speaker 4>anywhere in the world. Cryptocurrency is absolutely on fire. Cryptocurrency

0:08:41.679 --> 0:08:42.920
<v Speaker 4>is taking on the well.

0:08:42.960 --> 0:08:45.440
<v Speaker 5>Bitcoin is up this year by about five percent, the

0:08:45.520 --> 0:08:47.400
<v Speaker 5>S and P is up fifteen percent, the Nazeq one

0:08:47.480 --> 0:08:50.840
<v Speaker 5>hundreds up twenty percent, Gold is up plus this year.

0:08:51.080 --> 0:08:51.960
<v Speaker 6>No, I'm just saying, do.

0:08:51.920 --> 0:08:53.560
<v Speaker 4>You want to reverse hold on, Carol? Do you want

0:08:53.600 --> 0:08:55.040
<v Speaker 4>do you want to reverse that? I mean, do you

0:08:55.040 --> 0:08:56.240
<v Speaker 4>want to go back two years? You want to go

0:08:56.240 --> 0:08:57.640
<v Speaker 4>back three years, you want to go back five years,

0:08:57.640 --> 0:09:01.439
<v Speaker 4>you want to go back ten years. Prices to smartly

0:09:01.480 --> 0:09:03.800
<v Speaker 4>have gone up on average of about seventy percent a

0:09:03.840 --> 0:09:05.720
<v Speaker 4>year year over year for the last ten year period

0:09:05.760 --> 0:09:08.680
<v Speaker 4>of time. All I'm saying is, if you invested in

0:09:08.760 --> 0:09:11.599
<v Speaker 4>BTC two years ago, is probably the best investment you

0:09:11.600 --> 0:09:14.040
<v Speaker 4>could have made. If you made invested BTC five years ago,

0:09:14.720 --> 0:09:16.200
<v Speaker 4>you know, you're sitting on.

0:09:16.720 --> 0:09:18.040
<v Speaker 3>Infinite amounts of money. Right.

0:09:18.320 --> 0:09:22.280
<v Speaker 4>BTC has been probably the highest performing asset of the

0:09:22.360 --> 0:09:23.079
<v Speaker 4>last decade.

0:09:23.400 --> 0:09:23.559
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:09:23.600 --> 0:09:27.280
<v Speaker 4>And now also with BTC comes volatility. With crypto comes volatility.

0:09:27.360 --> 0:09:30.520
<v Speaker 4>Volatility is our friend. Volatility is something that should be harnessed, right,

0:09:30.640 --> 0:09:33.080
<v Speaker 4>and and so I think Bitcoin is going to continue

0:09:33.080 --> 0:09:36.400
<v Speaker 4>to massively overperform the you know the markets. Of course,

0:09:36.400 --> 0:09:38.760
<v Speaker 4>you're going to have drawdowns, right, I mean every cycle

0:09:38.760 --> 0:09:41.319
<v Speaker 4>has drawdowns. You're seeing you were talking about in Navidia,

0:09:41.920 --> 0:09:44.880
<v Speaker 4>you know in the intro click to to introducing me

0:09:44.960 --> 0:09:46.760
<v Speaker 4>today and how they're down four percent to this one

0:09:46.880 --> 0:09:49.800
<v Speaker 4>large companies on Earth, if not the largest company on Earth, Right,

0:09:49.840 --> 0:09:50.800
<v Speaker 4>I mean, that's down four percent.

0:09:50.840 --> 0:09:53.199
<v Speaker 3>You're going to have draw downs and things. That's that's life.

0:09:53.440 --> 0:09:53.640
<v Speaker 7>Now.

0:09:53.800 --> 0:09:57.400
<v Speaker 4>Look at the historical performance of an asset, and nothing

0:09:57.400 --> 0:09:59.079
<v Speaker 4>has compared to what Bitcoin is.

0:09:59.240 --> 0:10:02.440
<v Speaker 5>Totally understand markets, the ups and downs, and sometimes the

0:10:02.520 --> 0:10:06.680
<v Speaker 5>downs are an indication of either even moving down further. Hey,

0:10:06.679 --> 0:10:07.880
<v Speaker 5>one thing I want to ask you is, I think

0:10:07.880 --> 0:10:10.440
<v Speaker 5>you're on with Bloomberg. Back in September, you owned about

0:10:10.440 --> 0:10:12.440
<v Speaker 5>seven and a half percent of the company. Has that

0:10:12.559 --> 0:10:15.240
<v Speaker 5>number change because it sounds I can hear your conviction.

0:10:15.920 --> 0:10:18.440
<v Speaker 5>It sounds like it's a long term conviction when it

0:10:18.440 --> 0:10:21.880
<v Speaker 5>comes to the digital world and bitcoin in particular.

0:10:21.960 --> 0:10:23.400
<v Speaker 6>So are you buying more shares?

0:10:24.880 --> 0:10:27.079
<v Speaker 3>That number has not changed at all.

0:10:27.120 --> 0:10:30.160
<v Speaker 4>I have every share that I started this company with,

0:10:30.200 --> 0:10:33.560
<v Speaker 4>and I plan to for you know, a long time

0:10:33.559 --> 0:10:35.640
<v Speaker 4>to come. I love it, I believe in it. I

0:10:35.679 --> 0:10:37.319
<v Speaker 4>think the people that we're doing it with are the

0:10:37.320 --> 0:10:38.640
<v Speaker 4>smartest people in the world. We've got some of the

0:10:38.640 --> 0:10:43.480
<v Speaker 4>greatest energy contracts, We've got the most sophisticated facilities, and guys,

0:10:43.559 --> 0:10:44.920
<v Speaker 4>what I'll tell you. You know, I spent a lot

0:10:44.920 --> 0:10:46.200
<v Speaker 4>of time all over the world. I think you know

0:10:46.200 --> 0:10:47.880
<v Speaker 4>that from our real estate projects.

0:10:47.880 --> 0:10:48.360
<v Speaker 3>Everywhere.

0:10:48.880 --> 0:10:53.160
<v Speaker 4>Everybody wants cryptocurrency, everybody believes in cryptocurrency. Everybody's tremendously worried

0:10:53.200 --> 0:10:56.240
<v Speaker 4>about their respective governments, everybody's tremendously worried about their respective

0:10:56.240 --> 0:10:59.400
<v Speaker 4>financial systems. Especially when you leave the United States, you know,

0:10:59.640 --> 0:11:01.880
<v Speaker 4>people in so many countries around the world, they get paid,

0:11:02.360 --> 0:11:04.240
<v Speaker 4>you know, they may as well burn that paycheck because

0:11:04.240 --> 0:11:06.840
<v Speaker 4>of inflation. It absolutely kills them all of a sudden,

0:11:06.880 --> 0:11:09.040
<v Speaker 4>you know kind of You know, bitcoin is digital gold.

0:11:09.240 --> 0:11:11.800
<v Speaker 4>People believe in it. It's a great asset. It's an

0:11:11.840 --> 0:11:13.959
<v Speaker 4>asset that can't be inflated. It's an asset.

0:11:14.000 --> 0:11:16.080
<v Speaker 3>They'll only have twenty one million coins.

0:11:16.200 --> 0:11:18.080
<v Speaker 4>Ever, you know, if the price of gold ever went

0:11:18.080 --> 0:11:19.839
<v Speaker 4>to forty thousand bucks an ounce, guys, I would tear

0:11:19.880 --> 0:11:21.920
<v Speaker 4>down this building and I would find gold in the columns.

0:11:22.000 --> 0:11:24.520
<v Speaker 4>I'd find gold in the concrete. Right, you're going to

0:11:24.600 --> 0:11:26.480
<v Speaker 4>you're gonna you know, you're going to dig deeper, and

0:11:26.520 --> 0:11:27.960
<v Speaker 4>you're going to go farther, and you're going to spend

0:11:27.960 --> 0:11:29.920
<v Speaker 4>more money. You know, so you're never going to actually

0:11:29.960 --> 0:11:33.440
<v Speaker 4>have caps supply. With bitcoin, you have cap supply. And

0:11:33.480 --> 0:11:35.600
<v Speaker 4>I can tell you whether it's Asia, whether it's Middle East,

0:11:35.600 --> 0:11:38.520
<v Speaker 4>whether it's South America. You know, there is a longingness,

0:11:38.720 --> 0:11:41.240
<v Speaker 4>you know, to treasury bitcoin, and you're seeing that from

0:11:41.280 --> 0:11:43.800
<v Speaker 4>even some of the very biggest companies in the United States.

0:11:44.000 --> 0:11:46.000
<v Speaker 4>They're putting it on their balance sheets in ways that

0:11:46.040 --> 0:11:48.720
<v Speaker 4>they've never done before. Because they believe in digital assets

0:11:48.760 --> 0:11:51.599
<v Speaker 4>and and they you know, they believe in the attributes

0:11:51.600 --> 0:11:53.520
<v Speaker 4>of them, right, you know, and again, I'm a real

0:11:53.600 --> 0:11:54.040
<v Speaker 4>estate guy.

0:11:54.320 --> 0:11:55.360
<v Speaker 3>I love assets.

0:11:55.800 --> 0:11:58.080
<v Speaker 4>But think about something that's you know, transferable twenty four

0:11:58.120 --> 0:11:59.160
<v Speaker 4>hours a day, seven days a week.

0:11:59.160 --> 0:12:01.439
<v Speaker 3>Think about something that lobal. Think about something that's easier

0:12:01.440 --> 0:12:02.199
<v Speaker 3>to transport.

0:12:02.920 --> 0:12:05.200
<v Speaker 5>You do love assets, and you guys, your family is

0:12:05.200 --> 0:12:06.640
<v Speaker 5>so entrenched obviously in real estate.

0:12:06.679 --> 0:12:08.040
<v Speaker 6>You think Trump, you think real estate.

0:12:08.280 --> 0:12:10.120
<v Speaker 5>But I'm just curious, if you had to choose between

0:12:10.120 --> 0:12:12.680
<v Speaker 5>owning real estate or bitcoin, what.

0:12:12.600 --> 0:12:14.439
<v Speaker 3>Would it be both both?

0:12:14.559 --> 0:12:14.679
<v Speaker 8>No?

0:12:14.679 --> 0:12:18.360
<v Speaker 6>No, no, no, you have to choose. Come on, Eric, You're smart.

0:12:19.400 --> 0:12:20.640
<v Speaker 3>I grew up. I grew up when I was eleven

0:12:20.720 --> 0:12:22.040
<v Speaker 3>years old on construction sites. Right.

0:12:22.080 --> 0:12:25.120
<v Speaker 4>I clearly love tangible assets and I believe in them,

0:12:25.120 --> 0:12:27.880
<v Speaker 4>and I think bitcoin is is the greatest heage toward

0:12:27.920 --> 0:12:30.600
<v Speaker 4>those tangible assets. You know that there is what I

0:12:30.640 --> 0:12:32.600
<v Speaker 4>will tell you is, in any place other than the

0:12:32.640 --> 0:12:35.840
<v Speaker 4>United States, I would probably take cryptocurrency. I mean, imagine

0:12:35.840 --> 0:12:38.040
<v Speaker 4>if you lived in one of various South American countries

0:12:38.120 --> 0:12:40.319
<v Speaker 4>or one of you know, various you know, African kind

0:12:40.360 --> 0:12:43.560
<v Speaker 4>of countries that have instability where government can come in

0:12:43.600 --> 0:12:45.640
<v Speaker 4>at any time and steal your house, steal your piece

0:12:45.640 --> 0:12:47.000
<v Speaker 4>of property, steal your hotel.

0:12:47.640 --> 0:12:49.800
<v Speaker 3>Right, you don't have a chance. You know, you don't.

0:12:49.880 --> 0:12:51.880
<v Speaker 4>You don't have that problem with bitcoin. You don't have

0:12:51.920 --> 0:12:55.320
<v Speaker 4>that asset problem with either assets. That's you know, that's

0:12:55.360 --> 0:12:58.559
<v Speaker 4>that's literally qualified on Ledger twenty four hours a day.

0:12:58.640 --> 0:13:00.920
<v Speaker 4>So there's there's a real need for this asset class

0:13:00.960 --> 0:13:02.559
<v Speaker 4>around the world. And by the way, even in the

0:13:02.640 --> 0:13:04.079
<v Speaker 4>United States, I mean, guys, I became one of the

0:13:04.080 --> 0:13:06.559
<v Speaker 4>most debanked persons, you know people, you know American history,

0:13:06.600 --> 0:13:09.320
<v Speaker 4>for having never done anything wrong, you know, operating great

0:13:09.320 --> 0:13:14.040
<v Speaker 4>golf courses, operating great residential buildings, condominium associations, hotels, right,

0:13:14.080 --> 0:13:15.960
<v Speaker 4>and all of that got pulled out from under me

0:13:15.960 --> 0:13:17.240
<v Speaker 4>because my father happened to wear a hat.

0:13:17.280 --> 0:13:19.200
<v Speaker 3>I wasn't a politician, and I've never been politician. I've

0:13:19.240 --> 0:13:20.080
<v Speaker 3>never worked for the government.

0:13:20.320 --> 0:13:22.200
<v Speaker 4>We're wearing a hat that said make America great again.

0:13:22.200 --> 0:13:24.280
<v Speaker 4>All of a sudden, I start getting canceled left and right.

0:13:24.679 --> 0:13:27.559
<v Speaker 4>You know the interesting thing about crypto, you know, technology, blockchain,

0:13:28.200 --> 0:13:32.200
<v Speaker 4>pain technology, digital assets, digital wallets, can't cancel them, you

0:13:32.200 --> 0:13:34.839
<v Speaker 4>can't take them away, right, And that's a few lifful

0:13:34.880 --> 0:13:37.680
<v Speaker 4>thing and there's a flight to safety. There's a flight

0:13:37.720 --> 0:13:40.600
<v Speaker 4>to safety that a lot of people in America have

0:13:40.679 --> 0:13:43.360
<v Speaker 4>a harder time appreciating. Albeit when people see what happened

0:13:43.400 --> 0:13:45.280
<v Speaker 4>to us, they can appreciate more. But a lot of

0:13:45.280 --> 0:13:47.280
<v Speaker 4>people around the world can really appreciate. I think if

0:13:47.280 --> 0:13:48.880
<v Speaker 4>you lived in a lot of the Asian countries, you'd

0:13:48.880 --> 0:13:50.640
<v Speaker 4>appreciate it. I think if you lived lived in a

0:13:50.640 --> 0:13:52.559
<v Speaker 4>lot of places, and let me ask, just say here

0:13:52.559 --> 0:13:54.320
<v Speaker 4>in Africa, you probably appreciate that.

0:13:54.440 --> 0:13:58.280
<v Speaker 5>Now I understand what you're saying. And I think, you know,

0:13:58.320 --> 0:14:00.400
<v Speaker 5>we've been talking about cryptocurrencies for a long long time

0:14:00.400 --> 0:14:02.600
<v Speaker 5>here at Bloomberg, and I think time will tell whether

0:14:02.679 --> 0:14:05.680
<v Speaker 5>or not, Uh, this is something that becomes well entrenched

0:14:05.720 --> 0:14:08.080
<v Speaker 5>within our financial system because at this point people are

0:14:08.080 --> 0:14:09.760
<v Speaker 5>still buying things like stocks and bonds.

0:14:11.960 --> 0:14:13.480
<v Speaker 6>No, I do.

0:14:13.600 --> 0:14:15.559
<v Speaker 5>But what I wanted to ask you is, and I

0:14:15.600 --> 0:14:17.360
<v Speaker 5>think it's something that we talked about in our planning call.

0:14:17.440 --> 0:14:19.760
<v Speaker 5>Do you do you feel like, you know, Tim asked about,

0:14:19.800 --> 0:14:23.240
<v Speaker 5>you know, maybe the advantage of you know, buying into

0:14:23.360 --> 0:14:26.280
<v Speaker 5>your company versus maybe a micro strategy or something else.

0:14:27.080 --> 0:14:27.920
<v Speaker 6>Do you feel like you.

0:14:27.880 --> 0:14:31.320
<v Speaker 5>Guys do have an advantage because of your proximity to

0:14:31.400 --> 0:14:34.000
<v Speaker 5>the White House. And I asked this full disclosure. When

0:14:34.040 --> 0:14:36.560
<v Speaker 5>we talk about paramount's guidance, we say the same thing

0:14:36.640 --> 0:14:40.440
<v Speaker 5>because we know that David Ellison certainly is looked upon

0:14:40.560 --> 0:14:43.440
<v Speaker 5>favorably by the White House when it comes to maybe

0:14:43.480 --> 0:14:45.400
<v Speaker 5>doing another acquisition. So do you think you have a

0:14:45.440 --> 0:14:48.280
<v Speaker 5>little bit of an advantage?

0:14:49.240 --> 0:14:51.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Carol, it's such a frustrating question.

0:14:52.000 --> 0:14:54.080
<v Speaker 4>Now, you know my advantage is are our advantage with

0:14:54.120 --> 0:14:56.320
<v Speaker 4>American Bigcoin is we can mind bigcoin at fifty cents

0:14:56.320 --> 0:14:59.240
<v Speaker 4>on the dollar roughly, you know, and we're mining bigcoin

0:14:59.280 --> 0:15:01.840
<v Speaker 4>every single day any other And by the way, Michael

0:15:01.880 --> 0:15:03.280
<v Speaker 4>is a very close friend of mine, and there's no

0:15:03.360 --> 0:15:06.080
<v Speaker 4>person in the world you know, virtually that I respect more.

0:15:06.080 --> 0:15:09.560
<v Speaker 4>He's an amazing human being, an incredible visionary and everything

0:15:09.600 --> 0:15:13.240
<v Speaker 4>he's accomplished. Our advantage to mining bitcoin is every single

0:15:13.320 --> 0:15:15.200
<v Speaker 4>day we mind a lot of bitcoin, and we do

0:15:15.240 --> 0:15:16.760
<v Speaker 4>so for fifty cents on the dollar. But wedn't even

0:15:16.760 --> 0:15:19.800
<v Speaker 4>another commodity you can do that with right every other

0:15:19.800 --> 0:15:22.160
<v Speaker 4>treasury company virtually out there, they have to go buy

0:15:22.160 --> 0:15:25.200
<v Speaker 4>bitcoin at the spot price at bitcoin that day. I

0:15:25.200 --> 0:15:28.000
<v Speaker 4>can effectively go out right now and mine bitcoin at

0:15:28.040 --> 0:15:30.600
<v Speaker 4>fifty percent of that number. I can also go out

0:15:30.640 --> 0:15:33.240
<v Speaker 4>and I can acquire bitcoin and American bitcoin, can go

0:15:33.240 --> 0:15:36.720
<v Speaker 4>out and acquire bitcoin at spot prices and guess what,

0:15:36.840 --> 0:15:39.200
<v Speaker 4>as I do that, I can also yield manage down pricing,

0:15:39.400 --> 0:15:41.600
<v Speaker 4>you know, based on the bigcoin that we mine each

0:15:41.640 --> 0:15:43.280
<v Speaker 4>and every day. Obviously, the amount that you can mine

0:15:43.320 --> 0:15:47.240
<v Speaker 4>is somewhat finite, even though our mining operations are growing

0:15:47.280 --> 0:15:50.160
<v Speaker 4>on a daily basis. But that's a great advantage that

0:15:50.200 --> 0:15:52.600
<v Speaker 4>I believe we have. We can increase the amount of

0:15:52.600 --> 0:15:56.360
<v Speaker 4>bitcoin for share of our shareholders, and we do, and

0:15:56.400 --> 0:15:58.440
<v Speaker 4>that's why we're growing as quickly as we are.

0:15:58.560 --> 0:16:01.480
<v Speaker 3>So I clearly believe in our strategy. I'm really really

0:16:01.520 --> 0:16:01.960
<v Speaker 3>proud that you.

0:16:02.200 --> 0:16:03.280
<v Speaker 6>Understand why you do.

0:16:03.440 --> 0:16:05.880
<v Speaker 5>Understand why we ask it, right, I mean full disclosure,

0:16:05.960 --> 0:16:08.440
<v Speaker 5>like we try to be as so many.

0:16:08.520 --> 0:16:10.280
<v Speaker 4>So many of the questions here I've just been. I

0:16:11.680 --> 0:16:14.760
<v Speaker 4>understand clearly where you stand, right but you know it's

0:16:14.800 --> 0:16:17.480
<v Speaker 4>not snow shock to me. I understand why you're asking

0:16:17.520 --> 0:16:20.280
<v Speaker 4>the question. I also understand that I have absolutely nothing

0:16:20.280 --> 0:16:21.920
<v Speaker 4>to do with the federal government. I want nothing to

0:16:21.960 --> 0:16:24.840
<v Speaker 4>do with the federal government. I have no internactional with

0:16:24.880 --> 0:16:28.360
<v Speaker 4>the federal government when it comes to crypto policy, I

0:16:28.440 --> 0:16:30.840
<v Speaker 4>stay in my own damn lane, and my lane is

0:16:31.040 --> 0:16:34.800
<v Speaker 4>operating the greatest hospitality company on Earth, an operating company

0:16:34.800 --> 0:16:36.800
<v Speaker 4>that I truly believe in with every ounce of my

0:16:36.840 --> 0:16:39.520
<v Speaker 4>heart and soul, which is what we're doing with bitcoin,

0:16:39.560 --> 0:16:42.280
<v Speaker 4>which again historically has been an incredible asset. He eric

0:16:42.480 --> 0:16:44.680
<v Speaker 4>when I hear so when I hear questions about how

0:16:45.240 --> 0:16:48.400
<v Speaker 4>you know somebody could possibly argue that that Biden had

0:16:48.440 --> 0:16:51.520
<v Speaker 4>better energy policies for the United States than the Donald Trump,

0:16:52.040 --> 0:16:52.880
<v Speaker 4>like like, give.

0:16:52.760 --> 0:16:54.960
<v Speaker 6>Me, give me a p I didn't argue that.

0:16:55.080 --> 0:16:56.800
<v Speaker 5>I just you know, we are we are a data

0:16:56.880 --> 0:17:00.400
<v Speaker 5>driven company, and so I look at Databata apartment.

0:17:00.400 --> 0:17:01.200
<v Speaker 3>Give me, give me the data.

0:17:01.240 --> 0:17:04.199
<v Speaker 4>Give me one quantifiable metric where Joe Biden was a

0:17:04.200 --> 0:17:05.119
<v Speaker 4>better energy president.

0:17:05.240 --> 0:17:08.240
<v Speaker 3>Donald Trump, you can't Well, they just can't.

0:17:08.359 --> 0:17:09.120
<v Speaker 6>Well, I will see.

0:17:09.000 --> 0:17:13.719
<v Speaker 4>Who president on the first day of his term cancel

0:17:13.840 --> 0:17:17.440
<v Speaker 4>every pipeline, including the Keystone Xcel pipeline, which is why

0:17:17.480 --> 0:17:19.639
<v Speaker 4>every gas pump in the United States of America had

0:17:19.640 --> 0:17:21.840
<v Speaker 4>a little sticker on us saying I did that. And

0:17:21.880 --> 0:17:24.879
<v Speaker 4>there's a picture of Joe Biden pointing to the price

0:17:24.960 --> 0:17:28.679
<v Speaker 4>of gas. Please spare me this conversation. You've got some

0:17:28.680 --> 0:17:31.119
<v Speaker 4>of the lowest gas prices in the history of our country.

0:17:31.280 --> 0:17:33.959
<v Speaker 4>They're coming down every single day. You've got an administration

0:17:34.080 --> 0:17:38.000
<v Speaker 4>that are putting through permits for nuclear reactors like their pays,

0:17:38.119 --> 0:17:40.560
<v Speaker 4>because we need it if we're going to be successful.

0:17:40.640 --> 0:17:43.719
<v Speaker 4>Based on all the metrics site I gave you, no

0:17:43.760 --> 0:17:45.920
<v Speaker 4>one can credibly tell me. You know, as these guys

0:17:45.920 --> 0:17:48.040
<v Speaker 4>build the build wind farms in the middle of nowhere

0:17:48.040 --> 0:17:49.520
<v Speaker 4>that aren't even plugged into the grid.

0:17:49.960 --> 0:17:52.480
<v Speaker 3>I mean, and I say that with all due respect Carrol.

0:17:52.560 --> 0:17:54.080
<v Speaker 6>Now I know, I know, and I don't want to argue.

0:17:54.119 --> 0:17:56.200
<v Speaker 5>I mean, but there's a reason that you know, WTI

0:17:56.320 --> 0:17:58.720
<v Speaker 5>crewed is below sixty dollars a barrel. And you know,

0:17:59.119 --> 0:18:02.280
<v Speaker 5>you know, the oil giants will talk and they'll say, listen.

0:18:02.040 --> 0:18:02.760
<v Speaker 6>We're only going to d.

0:18:04.720 --> 0:18:06.920
<v Speaker 5>We're only going to do it if it makes sense,

0:18:07.000 --> 0:18:10.080
<v Speaker 5>if the if the price of oil goes up, because

0:18:10.080 --> 0:18:12.040
<v Speaker 5>there is you know, balance sheets, there's going to be

0:18:12.040 --> 0:18:15.560
<v Speaker 5>a cost of drilling and doing exploration, and they're not

0:18:15.600 --> 0:18:17.320
<v Speaker 5>going to do it unless the price of oil, whether

0:18:17.359 --> 0:18:18.680
<v Speaker 5>the demand is there, and as.

0:18:18.560 --> 0:18:20.919
<v Speaker 4>There is oiler do you think any of it has

0:18:20.960 --> 0:18:24.080
<v Speaker 4>anything to do with the transportation of oil. Right when

0:18:24.160 --> 0:18:26.199
<v Speaker 4>when you're shutting down pipelines every single day, you know

0:18:26.240 --> 0:18:28.920
<v Speaker 4>what else is affecting price the fact that you can't

0:18:28.960 --> 0:18:32.240
<v Speaker 4>move something that's naturally heavy, right, And that's what Joe

0:18:32.280 --> 0:18:33.080
<v Speaker 4>Biden was doing.

0:18:33.119 --> 0:18:35.680
<v Speaker 3>It was the biggest It was the biggest.

0:18:36.000 --> 0:18:38.919
<v Speaker 4>War on oil and gas, all for the purpose of

0:18:38.960 --> 0:18:43.880
<v Speaker 4>creating ev cars that the consumers around this country did

0:18:43.960 --> 0:18:46.280
<v Speaker 4>not want to buy. I mean, how many billions of

0:18:46.320 --> 0:18:48.720
<v Speaker 4>dollars did they spend building four charging stations in the

0:18:48.760 --> 0:18:52.159
<v Speaker 4>middle of absolutely nowhere, you know, under Pete boudha Jed

0:18:52.200 --> 0:18:54.600
<v Speaker 4>your transportation sectary, who is completely competent.

0:18:54.680 --> 0:18:56.720
<v Speaker 5>All right, I don't want I don't want to get

0:18:56.720 --> 0:18:59.879
<v Speaker 5>too political, but anyway, listen, in five years, what do

0:18:59.880 --> 0:19:01.600
<v Speaker 5>you hope your company is just to wrap up?

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:02.880
<v Speaker 6>Where do where do you see?

0:19:02.880 --> 0:19:03.720
<v Speaker 7>It's its role?

0:19:04.960 --> 0:19:06.199
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm glad we came back to this.

0:19:06.280 --> 0:19:08.879
<v Speaker 4>Thank you. I think we're gonna create one of the

0:19:08.920 --> 0:19:11.800
<v Speaker 4>great bigcoin companies anywhere in America.

0:19:12.320 --> 0:19:14.439
<v Speaker 3>We're sending the ladder very quickly. I think I mentioned that.

0:19:14.520 --> 0:19:16.960
<v Speaker 4>You know we're under three months old, and you know

0:19:17.000 --> 0:19:21.600
<v Speaker 4>we're a twenty fifth largest public bitcoin Treasury Company on

0:19:21.640 --> 0:19:23.560
<v Speaker 4>all the lists, and we're sending that list very quickly.

0:19:23.560 --> 0:19:25.720
<v Speaker 4>We just passed GEM and I very good friends of ours,

0:19:25.760 --> 0:19:27.920
<v Speaker 4>the Winkle Losses, who you know, they actually invested in

0:19:27.960 --> 0:19:30.000
<v Speaker 4>America Bitcoin and they're good friends of ours.

0:19:30.000 --> 0:19:32.600
<v Speaker 3>And it seems like every day we're kind of climbing

0:19:32.600 --> 0:19:33.760
<v Speaker 3>another step up that ladder.

0:19:34.400 --> 0:19:36.080
<v Speaker 4>I think we're doing it well. I think we're doing

0:19:36.080 --> 0:19:37.840
<v Speaker 4>which my disheart and soul. I think we're doing it

0:19:37.840 --> 0:19:40.560
<v Speaker 4>here in the United States of America. I think that's

0:19:40.560 --> 0:19:43.960
<v Speaker 4>film rapic to this country. And uh, you know, we

0:19:44.320 --> 0:19:48.040
<v Speaker 4>need to lead the world in the financial you know,

0:19:48.160 --> 0:19:52.560
<v Speaker 4>digital financial revolution. Bigcoin is clearly leading that charge right

0:19:52.600 --> 0:19:55.600
<v Speaker 4>now based on based on market cap and uh and

0:19:55.640 --> 0:19:57.440
<v Speaker 4>I'm very very proud of the company.

0:19:57.119 --> 0:19:59.119
<v Speaker 3>We're building and the speed of our growth right and

0:19:59.119 --> 0:20:00.760
<v Speaker 3>I think we're going to I'm.

0:20:00.640 --> 0:20:02.920
<v Speaker 5>Sure all that financial execs too like this probably played

0:20:02.960 --> 0:20:05.719
<v Speaker 5>into it, possibly as well as regulatory stuff when they

0:20:05.720 --> 0:20:08.760
<v Speaker 5>were there at the White House. It's all coming at us. Hey, Eric,

0:20:08.800 --> 0:20:11.359
<v Speaker 5>thank you so much, really appreciate it. We went around

0:20:11.400 --> 0:20:13.280
<v Speaker 5>and around, and I'm glad we were able to cover

0:20:13.359 --> 0:20:15.800
<v Speaker 5>a lot of ground. Eric Trump, co founder, chief strategy

0:20:15.800 --> 0:20:18.560
<v Speaker 5>Officer of American Bitcoin in Executi, vice president of the

0:20:18.560 --> 0:20:21.160
<v Speaker 5>Trump Organization, joining us there in Florida.

0:20:22.080 --> 0:20:24.840
<v Speaker 2>Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Business Week Daily coming

0:20:24.960 --> 0:20:25.840
<v Speaker 2>up after this.

0:20:29.800 --> 0:20:33.680
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast. Catch

0:20:33.760 --> 0:20:36.400
<v Speaker 1>us live weekday afternoons from two to five e's during

0:20:36.440 --> 0:20:39.879
<v Speaker 1>this listen on Applecarplay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg

0:20:39.920 --> 0:20:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Business app, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:20:44.080 --> 0:20:45.680
<v Speaker 5>As you know, we've got to sell off on Wall

0:20:45.720 --> 0:20:49.240
<v Speaker 5>Street traders bracing for a wave of economic releases after

0:20:49.240 --> 0:20:51.080
<v Speaker 5>the US government shutdown ended.

0:20:51.760 --> 0:20:54.120
<v Speaker 6>It has driven those stocks and bonds lower.

0:20:54.160 --> 0:20:57.320
<v Speaker 5>A concern on whether the data that we ultimately get

0:20:57.600 --> 0:20:59.639
<v Speaker 5>from the US government is they play catch up and

0:20:59.640 --> 0:21:02.320
<v Speaker 5>then start to get back on schedule. Whether or not

0:21:02.440 --> 0:21:06.280
<v Speaker 5>it clears the way for another cut by the US

0:21:06.320 --> 0:21:09.080
<v Speaker 5>Central Bank, it's kind of in question right now.

0:21:09.240 --> 0:21:12.000
<v Speaker 2>Another thing in question is just what this economy looks like.

0:21:12.200 --> 0:21:14.840
<v Speaker 2>So we're hearing from different companies, and we're hearing different things.

0:21:15.080 --> 0:21:18.080
<v Speaker 2>The latest Verizon discussing plans to announce job cuts across

0:21:18.119 --> 0:21:20.880
<v Speaker 2>the company next week. This according to people familiar with

0:21:20.960 --> 0:21:23.320
<v Speaker 2>the plans, the move a major step in a transformation

0:21:23.400 --> 0:21:26.800
<v Speaker 2>led by new CEO Dan Shulman. Nonetheless, Carol, it's another

0:21:26.840 --> 0:21:29.480
<v Speaker 2>example of another big company cutting some jobs.

0:21:29.600 --> 0:21:32.520
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, exactly. And then you do have FED speakers out there.

0:21:32.520 --> 0:21:35.280
<v Speaker 5>A Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco president Mary to

0:21:35.359 --> 0:21:37.960
<v Speaker 5>Hilly said it's too soon to decide whether policymakers should

0:21:38.040 --> 0:21:39.440
<v Speaker 5>lower interest rates in December.

0:21:39.480 --> 0:21:40.440
<v Speaker 3>Here's where we are.

0:21:40.800 --> 0:21:43.280
<v Speaker 5>Let's see what Elizabeth Renter has to say. She's senior

0:21:43.280 --> 0:21:46.280
<v Speaker 5>economist over at nerd Wallet. She's with us from Durham,

0:21:46.720 --> 0:21:49.879
<v Speaker 5>North Carolina. Hey Elizabeth, good to be talking with you

0:21:49.960 --> 0:21:52.679
<v Speaker 5>once again. So what conviction, first of all, do you

0:21:52.840 --> 0:21:56.199
<v Speaker 5>have in making calls on the US economy, on the

0:21:56.280 --> 0:21:58.400
<v Speaker 5>US labor market, on inflation.

0:22:00.000 --> 0:22:01.359
<v Speaker 7>Hey, well, thanks for having me again.

0:22:01.480 --> 0:22:03.960
<v Speaker 9>You know, it's tough to make sense of what's going

0:22:04.000 --> 0:22:06.320
<v Speaker 9>on in the economy right now because the access to

0:22:06.400 --> 0:22:09.360
<v Speaker 9>data is so limited. We're looking at private data sources

0:22:09.400 --> 0:22:12.400
<v Speaker 9>and trying to infer what the BLS would have said

0:22:12.640 --> 0:22:14.600
<v Speaker 9>over the past several weeks.

0:22:14.400 --> 0:22:17.520
<v Speaker 7>And that's difficult. That's not to say it's brand new, right.

0:22:17.760 --> 0:22:21.240
<v Speaker 9>Myself and the FED and economists across the country have

0:22:21.320 --> 0:22:23.800
<v Speaker 9>been looking at private data sources in addition to federal

0:22:23.880 --> 0:22:26.440
<v Speaker 9>data sources for some time. We're just having to put

0:22:26.480 --> 0:22:28.520
<v Speaker 9>more weight on them now than we would have.

0:22:29.200 --> 0:22:31.919
<v Speaker 3>I do think that just want to jump in.

0:22:32.040 --> 0:22:35.000
<v Speaker 2>What private data sources are the ones to you that

0:22:35.040 --> 0:22:38.520
<v Speaker 2>are most important? What do you think tells the fullest story?

0:22:39.320 --> 0:22:41.200
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, well, I think when it comes to the labor market,

0:22:41.240 --> 0:22:44.639
<v Speaker 9>there's several great private data sources. So the ADP is

0:22:44.680 --> 0:22:47.320
<v Speaker 9>a reliable data source. But all of these private data

0:22:47.320 --> 0:22:50.480
<v Speaker 9>sources have unique caveats. They're measuring slightly different things, and

0:22:50.520 --> 0:22:54.040
<v Speaker 9>you need to take that into consideration. So ADP misses

0:22:54.040 --> 0:22:57.399
<v Speaker 9>government jobs entirely. They are more likely to overstate the

0:22:57.480 --> 0:22:59.639
<v Speaker 9>number of jobs being added to the economy right now

0:22:59.720 --> 0:23:02.639
<v Speaker 9>because they're not catching federal jobs for example, which we

0:23:02.720 --> 0:23:05.200
<v Speaker 9>know is a big item this year, entirely in twenty

0:23:05.280 --> 0:23:05.840
<v Speaker 9>twenty five.

0:23:06.400 --> 0:23:08.719
<v Speaker 7>Then you have a source like Revellio Labs.

0:23:08.880 --> 0:23:11.720
<v Speaker 9>They're another solid source of labor market data, but they're

0:23:12.280 --> 0:23:15.679
<v Speaker 9>searching job profiles, professional profiles, so there may be a

0:23:15.720 --> 0:23:18.480
<v Speaker 9>delay in their data because they're catching if you're open

0:23:18.520 --> 0:23:21.400
<v Speaker 9>to work on LinkedIn for example. Putting all of these

0:23:21.440 --> 0:23:23.679
<v Speaker 9>together takes a little more work than just looking at

0:23:23.680 --> 0:23:26.959
<v Speaker 9>the jobs report every month, but I think that's what

0:23:26.960 --> 0:23:27.640
<v Speaker 9>we have to do in.

0:23:27.600 --> 0:23:28.320
<v Speaker 7>The current environment.

0:23:28.400 --> 0:23:30.800
<v Speaker 6>All right, So labor market just quickly, how do you

0:23:30.840 --> 0:23:31.199
<v Speaker 6>see it?

0:23:32.680 --> 0:23:35.360
<v Speaker 9>Solid but gradually cooling, which is I think in alignment

0:23:35.400 --> 0:23:39.159
<v Speaker 9>with what FED share Pole said just a couple of

0:23:39.200 --> 0:23:42.840
<v Speaker 9>weeks ago. You know, there is some weakness. Hiring is slow,

0:23:42.920 --> 0:23:45.879
<v Speaker 9>but the unemployment rate, according to the Cleveland or the

0:23:46.000 --> 0:23:49.320
<v Speaker 9>Chicago Fed now cast, remains in that four four and

0:23:49.359 --> 0:23:52.320
<v Speaker 9>a half percent range, So not alarming. We are hearing

0:23:52.320 --> 0:23:55.440
<v Speaker 9>a lot about layoffs in the headlines, but the headlines

0:23:55.480 --> 0:23:57.920
<v Speaker 9>and what happens in practice or what would have been

0:23:57.960 --> 0:24:01.000
<v Speaker 9>reflected in the BLS data are two different things.

0:24:00.840 --> 0:24:01.200
<v Speaker 6>All right.

0:24:01.280 --> 0:24:03.920
<v Speaker 5>Inflation, so I want to just point out. In an

0:24:03.920 --> 0:24:07.760
<v Speaker 5>interview with MarketWatch published today, Cleveland FED President Beth Hammick

0:24:08.040 --> 0:24:11.560
<v Speaker 5>said she's worried market participants might doubt the Fed's commitment

0:24:11.560 --> 0:24:13.760
<v Speaker 5>to its two percent inflation target as the central bank

0:24:14.040 --> 0:24:20.560
<v Speaker 5>continues to lower rates two percent that target and then

0:24:20.720 --> 0:24:23.080
<v Speaker 5>where we are in terms of US inflation, how sticky

0:24:23.080 --> 0:24:25.160
<v Speaker 5>it is as we get kind of closer to two

0:24:25.200 --> 0:24:26.280
<v Speaker 5>percent but not quite there.

0:24:27.280 --> 0:24:29.440
<v Speaker 9>Well, I think we can so confidently say that inflation

0:24:29.520 --> 0:24:32.240
<v Speaker 9>is high, it's above target, but it's not accelerating rapidly.

0:24:32.800 --> 0:24:34.800
<v Speaker 9>So another source I look to for this one is the.

0:24:34.760 --> 0:24:36.160
<v Speaker 7>Cleveland FED now cast.

0:24:36.920 --> 0:24:40.400
<v Speaker 9>They compile data from commodity prices and other high frequency

0:24:40.400 --> 0:24:43.399
<v Speaker 9>sources to estimate where the CPI would be, and it

0:24:43.440 --> 0:24:45.640
<v Speaker 9>says that, you know, just that inflation is steadily high

0:24:45.680 --> 0:24:49.960
<v Speaker 9>but not accelerating right now. I think expectations are in alignment,

0:24:49.960 --> 0:24:52.359
<v Speaker 9>whether you're asking the FED or asking consumers.

0:24:52.480 --> 0:24:54.600
<v Speaker 7>Up in the short term is what people anticipate.

0:24:54.720 --> 0:24:57.159
<v Speaker 9>Right Inflation is going to remain above that target but

0:24:57.200 --> 0:24:58.800
<v Speaker 9>then come down in the long term.

0:24:58.840 --> 0:25:00.919
<v Speaker 5>Can I just ask you, you know, I know, I

0:25:01.000 --> 0:25:03.880
<v Speaker 5>understand that prices are not going up like they were

0:25:04.040 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 5>a year, year and a half, two years ago. I

0:25:06.280 --> 0:25:09.000
<v Speaker 5>get that, but they're also not going down. And I

0:25:09.080 --> 0:25:11.959
<v Speaker 5>mean the reality of kind of what we're all paying

0:25:12.040 --> 0:25:12.680
<v Speaker 5>for things?

0:25:13.880 --> 0:25:15.720
<v Speaker 6>Is this just it and that's just the way it is?

0:25:15.760 --> 0:25:18.160
<v Speaker 5>And why does it feel like we are still paying

0:25:18.200 --> 0:25:21.680
<v Speaker 5>a lot for stuff? And is that a new reality

0:25:21.720 --> 0:25:24.639
<v Speaker 5>that things are just costing more in today's society?

0:25:25.720 --> 0:25:28.200
<v Speaker 9>Well, I think there's several reasons for that right now

0:25:28.240 --> 0:25:31.320
<v Speaker 9>this year, there are several sources of inflationary pressure, and

0:25:31.359 --> 0:25:33.439
<v Speaker 9>we're seeing that we have seen that up until this

0:25:33.520 --> 0:25:34.840
<v Speaker 9>point in the inflation data.

0:25:35.160 --> 0:25:35.560
<v Speaker 8>You know, the.

0:25:35.520 --> 0:25:37.879
<v Speaker 9>Impact of tariffs has kind of been trickling in, but

0:25:38.000 --> 0:25:42.479
<v Speaker 9>also demand for services has kept services inflation high. I

0:25:42.520 --> 0:25:44.960
<v Speaker 9>think also it's because we're all hyper attuned to it.

0:25:45.000 --> 0:25:47.000
<v Speaker 9>You know, there's research out there that says after a

0:25:47.040 --> 0:25:50.040
<v Speaker 9>period of high inflation, we're all going to be extra

0:25:50.160 --> 0:25:52.840
<v Speaker 9>sensitive to inflation, and I think that also plays a role.

0:25:53.560 --> 0:25:55.959
<v Speaker 9>We're all we all have our eyes out for it, right, So,

0:25:56.200 --> 0:25:59.159
<v Speaker 9>because inflation is higher than we'd like, it's going to

0:25:59.160 --> 0:26:02.600
<v Speaker 9>be particularly paid in light of the recent high inflation period.

0:26:03.000 --> 0:26:06.159
<v Speaker 2>Elizabeth, I had an interesting conversation with somebody today about

0:26:06.200 --> 0:26:09.160
<v Speaker 2>the Federal Reserve and just the idea of FED independence,

0:26:09.640 --> 0:26:12.240
<v Speaker 2>and I'm curious about your view on this. Her argument

0:26:12.280 --> 0:26:17.240
<v Speaker 2>to me was, we're starting to look at monetary policy

0:26:17.320 --> 0:26:20.800
<v Speaker 2>in the United States that represents not necessarily monetary policy

0:26:20.920 --> 0:26:24.160
<v Speaker 2>historically in the US, but one that's under more political

0:26:24.200 --> 0:26:27.199
<v Speaker 2>pressure than we've seen, at least in recent years. And

0:26:27.240 --> 0:26:29.840
<v Speaker 2>to her, it's starting to look like something more out

0:26:29.880 --> 0:26:33.560
<v Speaker 2>of the developing world, where Monterey policy is more politically influenced.

0:26:33.680 --> 0:26:34.719
<v Speaker 2>I'm wondering your view on that.

0:26:35.960 --> 0:26:37.520
<v Speaker 9>I don't know if I would take that quite of

0:26:37.560 --> 0:26:39.760
<v Speaker 9>a bleak look. I mean I believe the risk is there,

0:26:39.920 --> 0:26:42.080
<v Speaker 9>you know. I think it was just earlier this week

0:26:42.119 --> 0:26:44.919
<v Speaker 9>where bost It came out and said he plans on

0:26:45.000 --> 0:26:48.040
<v Speaker 9>retiring next year, which opens up another seat on the FED.

0:26:48.720 --> 0:26:52.480
<v Speaker 9>And the risk is always there that as an administration

0:26:52.640 --> 0:26:55.920
<v Speaker 9>has undew influence on who is who takes a seat

0:26:56.000 --> 0:26:59.359
<v Speaker 9>at those decision making tables, there could be more pressure

0:26:59.400 --> 0:26:59.760
<v Speaker 9>than usual.

0:27:00.119 --> 0:27:02.480
<v Speaker 7>Do have pretty deep.

0:27:02.240 --> 0:27:04.960
<v Speaker 9>Faith in the independence of the FED and sort of

0:27:05.000 --> 0:27:08.600
<v Speaker 9>the dedication to independent monetary policy that these people have

0:27:08.800 --> 0:27:11.280
<v Speaker 9>in these positions, But I do think we have higher

0:27:11.400 --> 0:27:13.760
<v Speaker 9>risks now than we did, say a couple of years ago.

0:27:13.920 --> 0:27:16.000
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean, you know, part of I think confusion

0:27:16.040 --> 0:27:19.399
<v Speaker 5>on maybe the part of investors when they're thinking about

0:27:19.880 --> 0:27:21.639
<v Speaker 5>the data that's going to come and whether or not

0:27:21.760 --> 0:27:24.960
<v Speaker 5>it provides conviction for another rate cut come December. The

0:27:25.000 --> 0:27:27.399
<v Speaker 5>part of it is, I mean FED officials themselves are

0:27:27.440 --> 0:27:31.200
<v Speaker 5>divided right on the best path ahead for interest rates

0:27:31.280 --> 0:27:34.320
<v Speaker 5>due to high inflation and continued weakness in the labor market,

0:27:34.600 --> 0:27:38.120
<v Speaker 5>you know. So you know, it's a dual mandate that's

0:27:38.200 --> 0:27:42.040
<v Speaker 5>tough when both parts of the mandate are tricky right now,

0:27:42.160 --> 0:27:46.720
<v Speaker 5>right and maybe create some problems or would determine a

0:27:46.880 --> 0:27:50.520
<v Speaker 5>different FED policy for each And you do wonder that

0:27:50.640 --> 0:27:54.879
<v Speaker 5>debate and which voices are going to sound the loudest

0:27:55.000 --> 0:27:58.560
<v Speaker 5>and perhaps have more swaite assuming feed your Jay Powells

0:27:58.600 --> 0:28:00.920
<v Speaker 5>among them, But how we need to think about that

0:28:00.960 --> 0:28:02.040
<v Speaker 5>in the next FED decision.

0:28:03.000 --> 0:28:04.240
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, you're absolutely right.

0:28:04.280 --> 0:28:07.200
<v Speaker 9>So not only is the data pointing to the dual

0:28:07.240 --> 0:28:09.560
<v Speaker 9>mandate sort of the two sides of the dual mandate

0:28:09.600 --> 0:28:12.159
<v Speaker 9>being at odds, right, we still have high inflation and

0:28:12.200 --> 0:28:14.800
<v Speaker 9>the labor market is cooling, but neither one of those

0:28:14.800 --> 0:28:15.480
<v Speaker 9>things are sort.

0:28:15.359 --> 0:28:16.280
<v Speaker 7>Of at a tipping point.

0:28:16.440 --> 0:28:20.240
<v Speaker 9>Right. We're not seeing a skyrocketing unemployment rate, and inflation

0:28:20.480 --> 0:28:23.399
<v Speaker 9>is not at target, but it's not alarmingly high.

0:28:23.600 --> 0:28:26.520
<v Speaker 7>So it makes sense that there's sort of more gray.

0:28:26.320 --> 0:28:28.520
<v Speaker 9>Area and people are going to fall on either side

0:28:28.520 --> 0:28:31.640
<v Speaker 9>of these decisions a little bit more than they normally win.

0:28:33.520 --> 0:28:36.600
<v Speaker 3>But I think we got to go.

0:28:37.320 --> 0:28:41.479
<v Speaker 5>I think I do listen, there's a lot going on,

0:28:41.520 --> 0:28:43.600
<v Speaker 5>and I guess as the data comes in ultimately, see,

0:28:43.640 --> 0:28:46.240
<v Speaker 5>it is certainly an interesting time to be talking about

0:28:46.280 --> 0:28:48.200
<v Speaker 5>the US economy, that is for sure.

0:28:48.280 --> 0:28:50.720
<v Speaker 6>Hey, Elizabeth, thank you so much. Elizabeth rent Or.

0:28:50.800 --> 0:28:53.800
<v Speaker 5>She's senior economist at Nerdwallet joining us from Durham at

0:28:53.800 --> 0:28:55.400
<v Speaker 5>North Carolina.

0:28:55.600 --> 0:28:58.400
<v Speaker 2>Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Business Week Daily coming

0:28:58.480 --> 0:28:59.400
<v Speaker 2>up after this.

0:29:03.360 --> 0:29:07.200
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast. Catch

0:29:07.280 --> 0:29:09.960
<v Speaker 1>us live weekday afternoons from two to five eas during

0:29:10.160 --> 0:29:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Listen on Applecarplay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app,

0:29:14.280 --> 0:29:15.000
<v Speaker 1>or watch.

0:29:14.800 --> 0:29:18.680
<v Speaker 6>Us live on YouTube. We got another stock on our radar.

0:29:18.800 --> 0:29:20.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, another stock that's moving lower. In fact, there's a

0:29:20.920 --> 0:29:24.000
<v Speaker 2>Disney down about eight percent. Shows that it's not so

0:29:24.120 --> 0:29:26.880
<v Speaker 2>magical at least today in the Magic Kingdom shares the

0:29:26.880 --> 0:29:29.400
<v Speaker 2>Wall Street our stands of the Walt Disney Company or

0:29:29.400 --> 0:29:31.680
<v Speaker 2>either down the most into April. This is the company

0:29:31.680 --> 0:29:33.960
<v Speaker 2>reported sales that fell short of Wall Street estimates and

0:29:34.000 --> 0:29:36.440
<v Speaker 2>set a slate of big budget films, including the new

0:29:36.440 --> 0:29:38.800
<v Speaker 2>Avatar picture Carol. Are going to weig on results for

0:29:38.840 --> 0:29:40.560
<v Speaker 2>the first quarter of its new fiscal year.

0:29:40.680 --> 0:29:44.000
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it's definitely played out in today's session. Hey, Disney

0:29:44.040 --> 0:29:47.920
<v Speaker 5>CFO CHI financial Officer Hugh Johnston joined Bloomberg Television earlier.

0:29:47.920 --> 0:29:51.600
<v Speaker 5>Today covered a variety of topics, including a succession plan

0:29:51.840 --> 0:29:54.000
<v Speaker 5>for the current CEO, Bob Iker.

0:29:54.480 --> 0:29:56.640
<v Speaker 10>What the board is indicated is that will take place

0:29:56.680 --> 0:30:01.400
<v Speaker 10>sometime during the first calendar quarter of twenty six. We

0:30:01.440 --> 0:30:06.480
<v Speaker 10>report in in next February. Whether that'll be before or after,

0:30:06.520 --> 0:30:09.680
<v Speaker 10>it'll be up to the board. But we should have

0:30:09.720 --> 0:30:11.880
<v Speaker 10>it done by the end of March.

0:30:12.040 --> 0:30:12.320
<v Speaker 4>All right.

0:30:12.360 --> 0:30:14.960
<v Speaker 5>That again is Disney CFO Hugh Johnson. As he said,

0:30:14.960 --> 0:30:18.120
<v Speaker 5>Disney expects to name a successor to Bob Iger by

0:30:18.160 --> 0:30:18.680
<v Speaker 5>the end of March.

0:30:18.760 --> 0:30:21.000
<v Speaker 6>Keep in mind, Iger was there for a long time.

0:30:20.800 --> 0:30:22.480
<v Speaker 2>Named Bob or not one named Bob.

0:30:23.120 --> 0:30:25.480
<v Speaker 6>That's a good points, that's my question.

0:30:25.680 --> 0:30:28.240
<v Speaker 2>But it was Bob followed by Bob, followed by Bob.

0:30:28.720 --> 0:30:31.560
<v Speaker 5>But okay, Bob Iger there for a long time, considered

0:30:31.760 --> 0:30:34.480
<v Speaker 5>kind of a mastermind in terms of CEOs and what

0:30:34.560 --> 0:30:36.920
<v Speaker 5>he did with Disney. Then Bob Jpek came in and

0:30:36.960 --> 0:30:40.280
<v Speaker 5>there was a lot of focus right on streaming and

0:30:40.320 --> 0:30:41.480
<v Speaker 5>then things just.

0:30:41.800 --> 0:30:44.160
<v Speaker 2>Everybody about the succession last time Bob.

0:30:43.960 --> 0:30:46.120
<v Speaker 5>Iger came back exactly. Okay, So we'll see whether or

0:30:46.120 --> 0:30:48.440
<v Speaker 5>not they have to be named Bob. Let's see what

0:30:49.040 --> 0:30:50.800
<v Speaker 5>our get to bring. An ath On has to say.

0:30:50.840 --> 0:30:53.640
<v Speaker 5>She's Bloomberg Intelligence senior media analyst. She's at BI headquarters

0:30:53.640 --> 0:30:57.200
<v Speaker 5>in Princeton. We're going to talk succession in a moment,

0:30:57.280 --> 0:30:59.480
<v Speaker 5>whether or not the next CEO Gita has to be

0:30:59.560 --> 0:31:03.600
<v Speaker 5>named Bob. But more importantly, let's talk about the quarter

0:31:03.640 --> 0:31:05.040
<v Speaker 5>that was and the outlook that is.

0:31:05.360 --> 0:31:06.680
<v Speaker 6>What do we need to know about earnings?

0:31:08.080 --> 0:31:08.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:31:08.360 --> 0:31:11.680
<v Speaker 8>Quarter that was was fine. It was pretty much in

0:31:11.720 --> 0:31:15.320
<v Speaker 8>line with expectations, Carol, I think what really has kind

0:31:15.360 --> 0:31:18.000
<v Speaker 8>of spooked the street a little bit is guidance. Again,

0:31:18.160 --> 0:31:21.440
<v Speaker 8>overall guidance for fiscal twenty twenty six seems to be okay.

0:31:21.920 --> 0:31:25.040
<v Speaker 8>I think really what investors are having a hard time

0:31:25.160 --> 0:31:27.240
<v Speaker 8>kind of wrapping their heads around is the fact that,

0:31:27.320 --> 0:31:29.680
<v Speaker 8>you know, Fiscal one Q looks really soft, which means

0:31:30.040 --> 0:31:32.720
<v Speaker 8>everything is going to get pushed to the back half

0:31:32.880 --> 0:31:35.040
<v Speaker 8>of fiscal twenty twenty six. And I think that's what's

0:31:35.120 --> 0:31:37.480
<v Speaker 8>causing a lot of the nervousness that we're seeing today.

0:31:37.640 --> 0:31:40.480
<v Speaker 2>I want to go right to the successor. Disney board

0:31:40.520 --> 0:31:42.560
<v Speaker 2>will name a successor to CEO Bob Iger.

0:31:42.720 --> 0:31:44.040
<v Speaker 6>Does it have to be named Bob?

0:31:45.040 --> 0:31:45.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:31:45.480 --> 0:31:47.800
<v Speaker 2>I mean who's on the shortlist right now?

0:31:48.880 --> 0:31:49.120
<v Speaker 7>Yeah?

0:31:49.160 --> 0:31:51.640
<v Speaker 8>So, I mean the first big question, Tim was is

0:31:51.680 --> 0:31:53.320
<v Speaker 8>this going to be an external candidate? Is there going

0:31:53.360 --> 0:31:55.920
<v Speaker 8>to be an internal candidate? So it looks like initially

0:31:55.920 --> 0:31:58.960
<v Speaker 8>when they started out, it was all for internal unit

0:31:59.040 --> 0:32:01.640
<v Speaker 8>heads that were in the race. So we're talking ESPN's

0:32:01.760 --> 0:32:04.920
<v Speaker 8>Jimmy Pittaro, we're talking Josh Tomorrow of the Parks, Dana Walden,

0:32:05.720 --> 0:32:08.520
<v Speaker 8>and Alan Bergman from the Studio and Content division. It

0:32:08.600 --> 0:32:11.320
<v Speaker 8>looks like that race has kind of now narrowed down

0:32:11.400 --> 0:32:14.479
<v Speaker 8>to two potential candidates. So we're looking at Dana Walden,

0:32:14.480 --> 0:32:17.520
<v Speaker 8>who is a creative genius, and of course you have

0:32:17.760 --> 0:32:20.720
<v Speaker 8>Josh Tomorrow, who is you know, who's headed Parks and

0:32:20.760 --> 0:32:24.000
<v Speaker 8>as a Parks veteran, has an absolutely stellar track record there.

0:32:24.400 --> 0:32:26.160
<v Speaker 8>So it's kind of going to come down to this

0:32:26.280 --> 0:32:29.920
<v Speaker 8>internal question. Right, for Disney, the content is the start

0:32:30.000 --> 0:32:34.200
<v Speaker 8>of everything. It is the source of everything, including you know, Parks.

0:32:34.280 --> 0:32:34.440
<v Speaker 6>Right.

0:32:34.480 --> 0:32:36.760
<v Speaker 8>The ip of Parks is all from the movies and

0:32:36.800 --> 0:32:39.360
<v Speaker 8>all the other creatives that they have going on at

0:32:39.360 --> 0:32:42.720
<v Speaker 8>film and TV. So again, which one is more important?

0:32:42.760 --> 0:32:44.520
<v Speaker 8>The last time they had a Park's Guide that didn't

0:32:44.560 --> 0:32:46.560
<v Speaker 8>go so well, so we'll have to wait and watch.

0:32:47.200 --> 0:32:49.360
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, you know, and right, they used to do things

0:32:49.480 --> 0:32:52.840
<v Speaker 5>I remember like reporting on Disney Kidden like people would

0:32:52.840 --> 0:32:55.640
<v Speaker 5>switch jobs, right the CFO with Parks, I think or

0:32:55.640 --> 0:32:57.719
<v Speaker 5>something you know, as they were kind of like a

0:32:57.760 --> 0:33:00.640
<v Speaker 5>CEO race, if you will, and let people kind of

0:33:00.640 --> 0:33:04.520
<v Speaker 5>get another view of the company looking at Dana Walden,

0:33:04.760 --> 0:33:09.240
<v Speaker 5>you know, coach chairman. Disney Entertainment does have a big portfolio.

0:33:09.400 --> 0:33:12.160
<v Speaker 2>Jimmy Kimmel when he spoke to Lucas Shaw earlier this

0:33:12.240 --> 0:33:15.600
<v Speaker 2>year at Bloomberg's screen time, he was Jimmy Kimmel. That

0:33:15.680 --> 0:33:18.840
<v Speaker 2>is incredibly complimentary of Dana Walden. Her name came up

0:33:18.880 --> 0:33:20.000
<v Speaker 2>so much during that interview.

0:33:20.120 --> 0:33:23.480
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, that's a really good point. I didn't realize she Yeah,

0:33:23.520 --> 0:33:26.720
<v Speaker 5>so she's done a lot of interesting things. Handmaid's Tale, Kardashians,

0:33:26.800 --> 0:33:28.000
<v Speaker 5>only murders in the building.

0:33:29.120 --> 0:33:30.840
<v Speaker 6>So what does Disney need?

0:33:30.920 --> 0:33:31.480
<v Speaker 7>In your view?

0:33:31.520 --> 0:33:34.360
<v Speaker 5>You understand this space and kind of how media has

0:33:34.400 --> 0:33:37.240
<v Speaker 5>continued to evolve in Disney's place within it, and Disney's

0:33:37.240 --> 0:33:40.360
<v Speaker 5>not just media, but they are media content and kind

0:33:40.360 --> 0:33:43.320
<v Speaker 5>of just putting it across their platforms.

0:33:43.600 --> 0:33:45.440
<v Speaker 6>What kind of CEO does Disney need?

0:33:46.000 --> 0:33:48.280
<v Speaker 8>They need somebody who can do everything right exactly is

0:33:48.360 --> 0:33:50.680
<v Speaker 8>what Bob Iger has done. I mean, so these are

0:33:50.720 --> 0:33:53.520
<v Speaker 8>some really big shoes to fill. I just wonder with

0:33:53.680 --> 0:33:56.640
<v Speaker 8>kind of you know, obviously, Dana Walden really good at

0:33:56.640 --> 0:34:00.000
<v Speaker 8>handling talent. You just brought up the Jimmy Kimmel controversy.

0:34:00.080 --> 0:34:02.480
<v Speaker 8>I mean, you need to be able to have a

0:34:02.480 --> 0:34:04.480
<v Speaker 8>lot of charisma, You need to be able to kind

0:34:04.520 --> 0:34:07.280
<v Speaker 8>of work with a lot of these very very hard

0:34:07.320 --> 0:34:10.879
<v Speaker 8>personalities in Hollywood. So I think Dana Walden definitely knows

0:34:10.920 --> 0:34:15.120
<v Speaker 8>her way around there. She obviously has a great reputation,

0:34:15.320 --> 0:34:17.440
<v Speaker 8>a great track record. But at the same time, and

0:34:17.440 --> 0:34:18.719
<v Speaker 8>you kind of look at the bread and butter of

0:34:18.760 --> 0:34:20.839
<v Speaker 8>the business that is the parks business, and you have

0:34:20.920 --> 0:34:23.360
<v Speaker 8>to kind of be an operations geek and an operations

0:34:23.480 --> 0:34:25.680
<v Speaker 8>nerd to really get the day to day running at

0:34:25.719 --> 0:34:27.480
<v Speaker 8>all of the parks, at all of the cruise ships,

0:34:27.800 --> 0:34:31.359
<v Speaker 8>the vacation's properties, and of course Josh Tomorrow is the

0:34:31.520 --> 0:34:35.160
<v Speaker 8>absolute superstar there. I really wonder whether they actually need

0:34:35.200 --> 0:34:37.799
<v Speaker 8>to have kind of a COSEO structure. I mean, we

0:34:37.840 --> 0:34:42.320
<v Speaker 8>know Netflix has done that pretty successfully. Spotify is looking

0:34:42.360 --> 0:34:45.600
<v Speaker 8>to do that starting in January, so you know, I

0:34:45.640 --> 0:34:49.080
<v Speaker 8>think it could work. But then again, you know, it's

0:34:49.080 --> 0:34:50.440
<v Speaker 8>also a recipe for disasters.

0:34:50.600 --> 0:34:53.560
<v Speaker 2>Hey, I love that. Maybe yeah, who knows, Well, maybe

0:34:53.560 --> 0:34:55.400
<v Speaker 2>we'll find out just in a few months before we

0:34:55.480 --> 0:34:57.880
<v Speaker 2>let you go in an environment where so many of

0:34:57.920 --> 0:35:01.120
<v Speaker 2>these large media companies are shedding assets or combining to

0:35:01.200 --> 0:35:04.600
<v Speaker 2>form new ones, are looking to buy more Disney's assets.

0:35:05.520 --> 0:35:07.160
<v Speaker 2>Is it the right size right now? Does it need

0:35:07.200 --> 0:35:07.960
<v Speaker 2>to shed any.

0:35:08.440 --> 0:35:10.480
<v Speaker 8>I don't think they need to shed anything, if at

0:35:10.520 --> 0:35:13.160
<v Speaker 8>all something comes up. It's pretty much just the linear

0:35:13.200 --> 0:35:16.239
<v Speaker 8>TV networks, but that is a smaller and smaller part

0:35:16.280 --> 0:35:19.040
<v Speaker 8>of the business. As we kind of look at the portfolio,

0:35:19.120 --> 0:35:21.720
<v Speaker 8>tim you just look at the theme parks business along

0:35:21.760 --> 0:35:24.720
<v Speaker 8>with all of the cruises, and then you put streaming together.

0:35:25.080 --> 0:35:26.960
<v Speaker 8>Just those two pieces of the business would be close

0:35:27.000 --> 0:35:29.920
<v Speaker 8>about seventy to seventy five percent percent of earnings in

0:35:29.960 --> 0:35:33.359
<v Speaker 8>twenty twenty fiscal twenty twenty six. So really those are

0:35:33.400 --> 0:35:35.960
<v Speaker 8>the big drivers in terms of earnings. I don't really

0:35:35.960 --> 0:35:38.600
<v Speaker 8>think they need to shed anything, but of course the

0:35:38.680 --> 0:35:40.640
<v Speaker 8>question is going to keep coming up whether they do

0:35:40.719 --> 0:35:43.200
<v Speaker 8>need to kind of spin off their cable TV networks.

0:35:43.880 --> 0:35:45.440
<v Speaker 5>I love it that it's like though it comes down

0:35:45.480 --> 0:35:48.480
<v Speaker 5>to like parks like being so important to the company. Hey, Gita,

0:35:48.600 --> 0:35:51.000
<v Speaker 5>thank you, Thank you. Gita ringing Athon. She's senior media

0:35:51.000 --> 0:35:52.480
<v Speaker 5>analysts at Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:35:52.600 --> 0:35:58.040
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Business Week daily podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:35:58.200 --> 0:36:01.760
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your pod casts. Listen live

0:36:01.840 --> 0:36:05.719
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from two to five pm Eastern on Bloomberg

0:36:05.760 --> 0:36:09.680
<v Speaker 1>dot com, the iHeartRadio app tune In, and the Bloomberg

0:36:09.719 --> 0:36:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Business app. You can also watch us live every weekday

0:36:12.800 --> 0:36:15.880
<v Speaker 1>on YouTube and always on the Bloomberg terminal