WEBVTT - FREE NFL Week 7 Early Picks | Line Movement Predictions (Ep. 550)

0:00:01.040 --> 0:00:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in everybody to betting pros. It's time to play

0:00:03.200 --> 0:00:05.720
<v Speaker 1>short bets. It's me Joey p Joe pez Apia and

0:00:05.880 --> 0:00:09.520
<v Speaker 1>this is VP NFL to look ahead for the early

0:00:09.600 --> 0:00:11.920
<v Speaker 1>value in Week seven in the NFL is my boy

0:00:11.960 --> 0:00:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Andrew eericckson the Undertaker, Andrew. We got our debut from

0:00:16.200 --> 0:00:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Drake May. He took his shots, but he delivered some touchdowns.

0:00:19.920 --> 0:00:22.120
<v Speaker 1>It was nice to see the Patriots have an offense again.

0:00:22.920 --> 0:00:26.320
<v Speaker 1>And if you're a Detroit Lions fan, you're very happy.

0:00:26.360 --> 0:00:29.440
<v Speaker 1>But my goodness, the Dallas Cowboys fans are hurting this

0:00:29.520 --> 0:00:30.400
<v Speaker 1>morning on a Monday.

0:00:31.000 --> 0:00:31.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's funny.

0:00:31.640 --> 0:00:34.320
<v Speaker 3>Somebody messaged me on Instagram in reference to a comment

0:00:34.360 --> 0:00:36.000
<v Speaker 3>I made. I'm not sure if it was the last show,

0:00:36.200 --> 0:00:38.839
<v Speaker 3>but one of the previous shows where the Dallas Cowboys

0:00:38.880 --> 0:00:41.400
<v Speaker 3>only playing blowouts. I don't know why they feel the

0:00:41.440 --> 0:00:43.800
<v Speaker 3>need to always play in blowouts, but it's either they're

0:00:43.840 --> 0:00:46.159
<v Speaker 3>blowing out the team or they're getting blown out, and

0:00:46.360 --> 0:00:49.000
<v Speaker 3>more recently it's been the latter, especially at home, where

0:00:49.040 --> 0:00:53.000
<v Speaker 3>Dallas has been a superstar team playing at home. I

0:00:53.080 --> 0:00:55.880
<v Speaker 3>believe they're zero to three now in Dallas. In Jerry

0:00:55.920 --> 0:00:58.400
<v Speaker 3>World and I mean, I'm not sure if that meme

0:00:58.480 --> 0:01:00.680
<v Speaker 3>was real, but I was seeing something where the graphics

0:01:00.680 --> 0:01:03.160
<v Speaker 3>of the scores actually blurred out of the giant screen

0:01:03.280 --> 0:01:05.400
<v Speaker 3>to not show the fans what the actual score of

0:01:05.440 --> 0:01:07.400
<v Speaker 3>the game was. In the Detroit Lion, social media is

0:01:07.400 --> 0:01:10.920
<v Speaker 3>obviously trolling the Dallas Cowboys, and I mean, when you're

0:01:11.000 --> 0:01:13.120
<v Speaker 3>up that big and you're throwing, you're trying to get

0:01:13.160 --> 0:01:16.399
<v Speaker 3>offensive lineman touchdowns with hooking ladders. I mean, you're just

0:01:16.400 --> 0:01:20.120
<v Speaker 3>having your will with the Dallas Cowboys. So just an

0:01:20.120 --> 0:01:21.520
<v Speaker 3>old fashioned spanking.

0:01:22.280 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Sure was, Sure was, but hopefully will spank week seven

0:01:26.720 --> 0:01:29.039
<v Speaker 1>right back here. And of course if you want some

0:01:29.040 --> 0:01:31.280
<v Speaker 1>free stuff, well we're giving away a sign Michael Strahan

0:01:31.360 --> 0:01:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Giants jersey this month. So if you want a chance

0:01:33.840 --> 0:01:37.119
<v Speaker 1>to win this bad boy free from our good friends

0:01:37.120 --> 0:01:38.880
<v Speaker 1>at Pristine Auction dot com, all you need to do

0:01:38.920 --> 0:01:42.039
<v Speaker 1>is head to Bettingpros dot com slash contest complete the format,

0:01:42.080 --> 0:01:44.440
<v Speaker 1>either download the Betting Pros app, leave a review of

0:01:44.480 --> 0:01:47.000
<v Speaker 1>the Betting Pros podcast, or subscribe to our social media

0:01:47.040 --> 0:01:49.840
<v Speaker 1>channels at Betting Pros on x and on TikTok and

0:01:49.880 --> 0:01:53.200
<v Speaker 1>of course Betting Pros NFL on Instagram. The more actions

0:01:53.240 --> 0:01:55.720
<v Speaker 1>you complete, the more entries you get to win the

0:01:55.720 --> 0:01:57.920
<v Speaker 1>straighthand jerseys. So we'll be announcing the winner right here

0:01:57.960 --> 0:02:00.640
<v Speaker 1>in the channel. Subscribe to the channel ring the belt

0:02:00.640 --> 0:02:02.120
<v Speaker 1>tolet Goes Dings, so you know if you're the big

0:02:02.120 --> 0:02:05.120
<v Speaker 1>winner and you never miss an episode of BP. Let's

0:02:05.200 --> 0:02:08.440
<v Speaker 1>get to week seven. Let's start here on Thursday Night football,

0:02:08.440 --> 0:02:11.000
<v Speaker 1>the Denver Broncos coming off a home loss. Here Sartan

0:02:11.080 --> 0:02:13.480
<v Speaker 1>as a concussion. I doubt he plays this week. New

0:02:13.560 --> 0:02:17.240
<v Speaker 1>Orleans Saints with Spencer Ratler or rookie QB who at

0:02:17.280 --> 0:02:20.359
<v Speaker 1>times had some decent moments, at times had some rookie moments.

0:02:20.400 --> 0:02:22.600
<v Speaker 1>The New Orleans Saints are one point favorites. That feels

0:02:22.600 --> 0:02:24.200
<v Speaker 1>about right to me. Thirty seven and a half is

0:02:24.200 --> 0:02:26.520
<v Speaker 1>the number and the money line right now. The best

0:02:26.600 --> 0:02:28.760
<v Speaker 1>numbers are getting are Denver minus one oh five and

0:02:28.840 --> 0:02:31.800
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans minus one fifteen. I think I'd go straight

0:02:31.840 --> 0:02:34.359
<v Speaker 1>money line here to New Orleans and the minus one fifteen.

0:02:34.560 --> 0:02:35.480
<v Speaker 1>What are your thoughts here?

0:02:35.560 --> 0:02:38.480
<v Speaker 3>Ericson, Yeah, this one is tough. You have two rookie

0:02:38.520 --> 0:02:41.360
<v Speaker 3>quarterbacks going ahead to head. For me, I'm leaning on

0:02:41.440 --> 0:02:43.359
<v Speaker 3>the coaching match up here. Sean Payton going back to

0:02:43.360 --> 0:02:45.959
<v Speaker 3>play his old team, coming off of bye, or coming

0:02:45.960 --> 0:02:48.120
<v Speaker 3>off a bad loss at home. I mean he's been

0:02:48.120 --> 0:02:51.799
<v Speaker 3>good on the road this season. Look Bonnicks versus Spencer Rattler.

0:02:51.960 --> 0:02:54.200
<v Speaker 3>Could Raller be better than Bonick, Sure, but in one

0:02:54.280 --> 0:02:56.440
<v Speaker 3>matchup doesn't really matter where he's without his number one

0:02:56.440 --> 0:02:58.800
<v Speaker 3>wide receiver, Chris Alave. You talked about certain being out

0:02:58.800 --> 0:03:00.840
<v Speaker 3>with the concussion, Well going to be out too with

0:03:00.919 --> 0:03:04.000
<v Speaker 3>his concussion. So I think both teams are undermanned here.

0:03:04.320 --> 0:03:06.200
<v Speaker 3>There's a reason why the total is what you said,

0:03:06.200 --> 0:03:07.960
<v Speaker 3>thirty six and a half. It's very very low and

0:03:08.000 --> 0:03:10.920
<v Speaker 3>at primetime unders on Thursday night, short week for two

0:03:11.000 --> 0:03:15.280
<v Speaker 3>rookie quarterbacks. This is shaping up to be Jaguars Titans

0:03:15.360 --> 0:03:18.080
<v Speaker 3>esque for those that remember those AFC South battles on

0:03:18.160 --> 0:03:21.160
<v Speaker 3>Thursday Night football with the color Rush jerseys. This game

0:03:21.160 --> 0:03:23.600
<v Speaker 3>could get ugly. So I will take take the underdog.

0:03:23.639 --> 0:03:26.920
<v Speaker 3>I'll take Sean Payton winning in a homecoming against the Saints.

0:03:27.240 --> 0:03:29.040
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's move on to the next one here,

0:03:29.080 --> 0:03:32.800
<v Speaker 1>which is again another London game for the Jacksonville Jaguars.

0:03:32.800 --> 0:03:35.400
<v Speaker 1>They're four and a half point favorites. I'm not sure

0:03:35.400 --> 0:03:38.200
<v Speaker 1>how or why against the New Engle Patriots. I know

0:03:38.280 --> 0:03:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Drake May's a rookie, but Drake May had some signs

0:03:40.680 --> 0:03:43.000
<v Speaker 1>of life there, and I don't know, I'm just checking

0:03:43.000 --> 0:03:45.240
<v Speaker 1>for a heartbeat when it comes to the Jaguars. Forty

0:03:45.280 --> 0:03:47.280
<v Speaker 1>two and a half is the number plus one eighty

0:03:47.280 --> 0:03:49.680
<v Speaker 1>for New England. I like the four and a half

0:03:49.720 --> 0:03:51.760
<v Speaker 1>here with the Pats. Ericson your thoughts.

0:03:52.200 --> 0:03:54.800
<v Speaker 3>When I was doing my projection to this game, I

0:03:54.920 --> 0:03:58.240
<v Speaker 3>had to make myself give the Jaguars, make them favorites,

0:03:58.400 --> 0:04:01.080
<v Speaker 3>because well, they're playing at home, quote in jackson or

0:04:01.080 --> 0:04:02.160
<v Speaker 3>in London here.

0:04:02.200 --> 0:04:03.560
<v Speaker 2>But I didn't feel good about it.

0:04:03.640 --> 0:04:05.360
<v Speaker 3>So the fact that this line is four and a

0:04:05.400 --> 0:04:07.600
<v Speaker 3>half opened at five and a half, so you're seeing

0:04:07.720 --> 0:04:10.640
<v Speaker 3>money already pour onto the Patriots here because why back

0:04:10.640 --> 0:04:12.520
<v Speaker 3>to the Jacksonville Daguars I did last week and to

0:04:12.520 --> 0:04:14.360
<v Speaker 3>the first half, I was like, okay, like I feel

0:04:14.360 --> 0:04:16.680
<v Speaker 3>pretty good about this, and then they just got absolutely

0:04:16.720 --> 0:04:19.320
<v Speaker 3>annihilated in the second half of that game against another

0:04:19.360 --> 0:04:22.919
<v Speaker 3>rookie quarterback. So look, Drake May threw more touchdowns in

0:04:22.960 --> 0:04:26.160
<v Speaker 3>Week six than Jacoby Brissett had thrown the five weeks combined.

0:04:26.720 --> 0:04:28.560
<v Speaker 3>This is one of the worst defenses in the NFL.

0:04:28.600 --> 0:04:30.839
<v Speaker 3>He drew against the Houston Texans, one of the toughest

0:04:30.839 --> 0:04:33.040
<v Speaker 3>matchup he could have on paper. And I don't know

0:04:33.080 --> 0:04:35.320
<v Speaker 3>how or why. It seemed like the Patriots offensive line

0:04:35.360 --> 0:04:37.679
<v Speaker 3>just gave Drake May more time than they had ever done.

0:04:37.560 --> 0:04:40.880
<v Speaker 1>With well he take. He got hit hard a couple

0:04:40.920 --> 0:04:41.359
<v Speaker 1>of times, but.

0:04:41.760 --> 0:04:43.479
<v Speaker 3>There were times where he was just standing there in

0:04:43.520 --> 0:04:45.279
<v Speaker 3>the pocket, in a clean pocket, and he was able

0:04:45.279 --> 0:04:48.119
<v Speaker 3>to operate that. I from the five weeks watching Jacoby Brissett,

0:04:48.360 --> 0:04:50.719
<v Speaker 3>I don't remember ever him having that situation, So I

0:04:50.720 --> 0:04:52.680
<v Speaker 3>wasn't sure if it was. Hey, offensive lineman, now that

0:04:52.720 --> 0:04:54.479
<v Speaker 3>we have the rookie back there, you actually need to

0:04:54.480 --> 0:04:59.159
<v Speaker 3>block people. So they stepped up. Jacksonville's defenses is so bad.

0:04:59.520 --> 0:05:01.520
<v Speaker 3>I think that Drake, I'm taking the Patriots here.

0:05:01.520 --> 0:05:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Easy, I'm with you here. At least we got that

0:05:04.839 --> 0:05:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Drake May over on the rushing yards. Nailed that one.

0:05:07.520 --> 0:05:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Even though it went up, we still got it at

0:05:09.080 --> 0:05:11.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty four and a half and it was a clear

0:05:11.160 --> 0:05:14.160
<v Speaker 1>easy sale. All right, So Miami comes back off the buy.

0:05:14.279 --> 0:05:16.920
<v Speaker 1>The Indianapolis Colts defense is not good. We don't know

0:05:16.920 --> 0:05:19.960
<v Speaker 1>if we're gonna get Flacco or Richardson for this game.

0:05:19.960 --> 0:05:21.800
<v Speaker 1>We thought we might get Richardson last week and ended

0:05:21.880 --> 0:05:24.440
<v Speaker 1>up being Flacco again in Week six. So the Colts

0:05:24.440 --> 0:05:26.720
<v Speaker 1>at home are four point favorites. Forty two and a

0:05:26.720 --> 0:05:29.880
<v Speaker 1>half is the number. Plus one sixty five for Miami. Look,

0:05:31.120 --> 0:05:32.560
<v Speaker 1>this is a tough one here because there's a lot

0:05:32.560 --> 0:05:35.039
<v Speaker 1>of unknowns. It feels like a stay away from me.

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:37.320
<v Speaker 1>If I had a lean right now, it would just

0:05:37.480 --> 0:05:40.320
<v Speaker 1>be taking the value, which is the team coming off

0:05:40.360 --> 0:05:43.200
<v Speaker 1>of bye, maybe having a better game plan, figuring out

0:05:43.240 --> 0:05:45.479
<v Speaker 1>a way to get things right in Miami. I know

0:05:45.520 --> 0:05:47.599
<v Speaker 1>the Miami defense hasn't played well, but neither was the

0:05:47.640 --> 0:05:51.120
<v Speaker 1>Colts defense. So maybe, just maybe, just it was it

0:05:51.160 --> 0:05:53.400
<v Speaker 1>closure eye special as terrell I to say plus one

0:05:53.480 --> 0:05:55.599
<v Speaker 1>sixty five for the Miami Dolphins on the money line,

0:05:55.640 --> 0:05:58.359
<v Speaker 1>like that's my instinct, but right now again more of

0:05:58.360 --> 0:06:00.360
<v Speaker 1>it incomplete. When it comes to news for this game,

0:06:00.360 --> 0:06:01.800
<v Speaker 1>do you feel the same way I do?

0:06:02.200 --> 0:06:02.800
<v Speaker 2>I think that.

0:06:03.520 --> 0:06:05.360
<v Speaker 3>I mean, how can you confantly back the Colts as

0:06:05.360 --> 0:06:06.920
<v Speaker 3>four and a half point favorites when you don't know

0:06:06.960 --> 0:06:08.920
<v Speaker 3>who their quarterback is going to be, and if it's

0:06:09.320 --> 0:06:12.000
<v Speaker 3>their second year quarterback, you probably feel worse about their

0:06:12.120 --> 0:06:14.720
<v Speaker 3>chances to win the game. Not Oh, they're gonna get

0:06:14.720 --> 0:06:17.119
<v Speaker 3>their starter back. I feel good about them. You're probably

0:06:17.120 --> 0:06:19.760
<v Speaker 3>gonna feel worse about the Colts if they get Anthony Richardson.

0:06:19.880 --> 0:06:22.120
<v Speaker 3>So I agree again he was trending in the right

0:06:22.120 --> 0:06:24.080
<v Speaker 3>direction to play. I'm not sure why it didn't work out,

0:06:24.520 --> 0:06:27.120
<v Speaker 3>but yeah, I think Miami off the bye week, you

0:06:27.120 --> 0:06:29.400
<v Speaker 3>look at one of the Colts' biggest weaknesses against the run.

0:06:29.560 --> 0:06:31.880
<v Speaker 3>So even if Tyler helped me back on her center,

0:06:31.880 --> 0:06:32.760
<v Speaker 3>he's a mobile quarterback.

0:06:32.800 --> 0:06:33.320
<v Speaker 2>He can run.

0:06:33.600 --> 0:06:36.720
<v Speaker 3>You have eight chan Moster Jalen Wright. Running backs that

0:06:36.720 --> 0:06:39.200
<v Speaker 3>are coming off a bye week should be healthy potentially,

0:06:39.440 --> 0:06:40.320
<v Speaker 3>so you can see them rip.

0:06:40.240 --> 0:06:42.680
<v Speaker 2>Off some big plays. So I like the Dolphins here as.

0:06:42.560 --> 0:06:46.760
<v Speaker 1>Well Tennessee Titans and Will Levis who did not quite

0:06:46.839 --> 0:06:49.680
<v Speaker 1>cross the one hundred yard mark here for passing. Yeah,

0:06:49.680 --> 0:06:53.400
<v Speaker 1>it's just the shy under there at ninety five. Well,

0:06:53.400 --> 0:06:55.200
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna go to Buffalo. We'll see what the Bills

0:06:55.240 --> 0:06:57.440
<v Speaker 1>do tonight on Monday Night football. I'll make sure you

0:06:57.480 --> 0:06:59.560
<v Speaker 1>follow us on social media. My Monday Night Football bets

0:06:59.560 --> 0:07:01.919
<v Speaker 1>are out and really hot last month or so, so

0:07:02.279 --> 0:07:04.640
<v Speaker 1>check those out. All player props staying away from this game.

0:07:04.960 --> 0:07:06.640
<v Speaker 1>I like the Bills to win, but I'm not betting

0:07:06.680 --> 0:07:08.640
<v Speaker 1>on it. I'm betting on Breisee Hall. I'm betting on

0:07:08.720 --> 0:07:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Josh Allen under for passing yards. But Allen at home

0:07:11.600 --> 0:07:13.600
<v Speaker 1>eight and a half way favorites. This makes sense. Forty

0:07:13.600 --> 0:07:16.400
<v Speaker 1>two and a half is the number, and then plus

0:07:16.400 --> 0:07:18.960
<v Speaker 1>three fifty for the Tennessee upsite, which you can stick

0:07:19.000 --> 0:07:21.200
<v Speaker 1>that one. I don't want it. I kind of want

0:07:21.200 --> 0:07:23.040
<v Speaker 1>to see what the Buffalo Bills do today and I

0:07:23.120 --> 0:07:24.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of want to see how they come out of

0:07:24.320 --> 0:07:26.560
<v Speaker 1>this game in terms of health with the Jets defense

0:07:26.640 --> 0:07:29.440
<v Speaker 1>before I get to Tennessee. But eight and a half,

0:07:29.560 --> 0:07:32.080
<v Speaker 1>it's hard not to justify that number, Andrew.

0:07:32.400 --> 0:07:35.040
<v Speaker 3>No, but we saw this last week with the Eagles

0:07:35.080 --> 0:07:37.600
<v Speaker 3>being almost ten point favorites against the Brown Sometimes the

0:07:37.680 --> 0:07:38.960
<v Speaker 3>number is just so big.

0:07:38.720 --> 0:07:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Which we said, it's too big of a number exactly.

0:07:41.960 --> 0:07:43.960
<v Speaker 3>So that's kind of like here, it's no, you don't

0:07:43.960 --> 0:07:45.920
<v Speaker 3>feel comfortable back in the Titans, But that's why the

0:07:46.000 --> 0:07:47.880
<v Speaker 3>number is so large as it is, especially because we

0:07:47.920 --> 0:07:49.680
<v Speaker 3>don't know they haven't played yet, right, so what if

0:07:49.760 --> 0:07:51.440
<v Speaker 3>Josh Allen gets banged up and then this number is

0:07:51.440 --> 0:07:53.480
<v Speaker 3>gonna plumb it, so I think right now it's easy

0:07:53.520 --> 0:07:55.920
<v Speaker 3>for me. The Titans, especially Bills, don't usually cover these

0:07:55.960 --> 0:07:58.480
<v Speaker 3>massive spreads playing at home. We've seen them. They're a

0:07:58.520 --> 0:08:00.320
<v Speaker 3>team that plays down in their competition. Coming off a

0:08:00.320 --> 0:08:04.040
<v Speaker 3>big Monday night game against the Jets AFC East rival,

0:08:04.480 --> 0:08:06.640
<v Speaker 3>I think that as gross as it sounds, I mean,

0:08:06.800 --> 0:08:08.200
<v Speaker 3>eight and a half is just too many points. So

0:08:08.240 --> 0:08:10.120
<v Speaker 3>I'll take the Titans speak gredging Lan and.

0:08:10.120 --> 0:08:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Poward's played very well too. I think that's the lone

0:08:12.120 --> 0:08:15.680
<v Speaker 1>bright spot there for the Tennessee Titans offense. I see

0:08:15.680 --> 0:08:17.520
<v Speaker 1>what you're saying. I don't feel as strongly about this

0:08:17.560 --> 0:08:20.000
<v Speaker 1>one as I did last week about the Cleveland Browns Eagles.

0:08:20.360 --> 0:08:22.880
<v Speaker 1>That one I felt very confident in, and that did

0:08:22.880 --> 0:08:26.120
<v Speaker 1>come to Fruition and Cincinnati and Cleveland. We'll see, well

0:08:26.160 --> 0:08:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Deshaun Watson make it out of Week seven. Tune in

0:08:29.240 --> 0:08:32.719
<v Speaker 1>to find out. The Cincinnati Bengals a four and a

0:08:32.720 --> 0:08:34.640
<v Speaker 1>half point favorites on the road. Forty four and a

0:08:34.679 --> 0:08:36.880
<v Speaker 1>half is the number plus one eighty. I'm just gonna

0:08:36.880 --> 0:08:38.720
<v Speaker 1>copy and paste last week, which is I'm waiting for

0:08:38.760 --> 0:08:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Winston to take over and kind of ruin the good time. Spread.

0:08:43.520 --> 0:08:45.880
<v Speaker 1>That being said, I mean the Bengals should win this

0:08:46.000 --> 0:08:48.160
<v Speaker 1>game in theory. I mean that's what they should do

0:08:48.800 --> 0:08:51.520
<v Speaker 1>against the Cleveland Browns, but in division games are always tricky.

0:08:51.880 --> 0:08:54.560
<v Speaker 1>It is on the road. Sininai's defense has played better

0:08:54.600 --> 0:08:57.560
<v Speaker 1>but still not well. Andrew any early value on this

0:08:57.600 --> 0:08:58.640
<v Speaker 1>one because I don't see much.

0:08:58.679 --> 0:09:01.960
<v Speaker 3>What did you say, the spread one four and a half? Okay,

0:09:02.040 --> 0:09:05.319
<v Speaker 3>right now, Courryah, that's pretty inligned with what I was projecting.

0:09:05.400 --> 0:09:09.080
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, I think that on paper, we don't consider

0:09:09.120 --> 0:09:10.520
<v Speaker 3>that it's a divisional match. Iup, you think, oh, this

0:09:10.600 --> 0:09:12.480
<v Speaker 3>is easy spot for the Bengals, but we've seen the Bengals,

0:09:12.559 --> 0:09:15.880
<v Speaker 3>especially Joe Burrows, struggle traditionally against AFC North opponents, Like

0:09:15.880 --> 0:09:18.440
<v Speaker 3>we've seen this a lot, especially with the Browns defense,

0:09:18.480 --> 0:09:21.720
<v Speaker 3>which has been very hotter cold, but much better defense

0:09:21.840 --> 0:09:23.480
<v Speaker 3>at home. And you saw them at least show up

0:09:23.559 --> 0:09:25.920
<v Speaker 3>last week against Philadelphi Eagles, who had all their weapons back.

0:09:26.120 --> 0:09:28.319
<v Speaker 3>Eagles offense didn't look great, and that's his credit to

0:09:28.360 --> 0:09:31.040
<v Speaker 3>the Cleveland Browns defense. So I think maybe for me

0:09:31.120 --> 0:09:33.959
<v Speaker 3>it's be leaned towards the under here and when you're

0:09:33.960 --> 0:09:36.600
<v Speaker 3>going back to yeah, maybe jamis Winson gets in. Maybe

0:09:36.600 --> 0:09:38.880
<v Speaker 3>they're just at this point they're just hoping that Deshaun Watson,

0:09:38.880 --> 0:09:40.640
<v Speaker 3>they're trying to get him to break the sack record

0:09:40.679 --> 0:09:42.920
<v Speaker 3>at this point, and maybe the coach Exavas give it.

0:09:43.080 --> 0:09:44.960
<v Speaker 3>There's no way he can last this entire season if

0:09:45.000 --> 0:09:48.080
<v Speaker 3>he gets sacked six seven times every single game.

0:09:48.120 --> 0:09:48.480
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:09:48.559 --> 0:09:50.160
<v Speaker 3>I mean, they say that he's gonna be the starter again,

0:09:50.240 --> 0:09:52.880
<v Speaker 3>but for what it's worth, so I think right now,

0:09:52.920 --> 0:09:54.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm probably just gonna be hands away from this game,

0:09:54.600 --> 0:09:55.640
<v Speaker 3>except for maybe the under.

0:09:56.400 --> 0:09:58.040
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's get to the next one on the board.

0:09:58.080 --> 0:09:58.240
<v Speaker 4>Here.

0:09:58.320 --> 0:10:02.400
<v Speaker 1>The Packers now four and two, hosting the Houston Texans. Now,

0:10:02.440 --> 0:10:04.760
<v Speaker 1>the Houston Texans are three point underdogs here going to

0:10:04.800 --> 0:10:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay. The numbers forty seven, the Houston money line

0:10:08.160 --> 0:10:10.640
<v Speaker 1>plus one thirty is tempting because I think Houston has

0:10:10.640 --> 0:10:13.040
<v Speaker 1>a real shot to win this game. Jordan Love throwing

0:10:13.080 --> 0:10:15.440
<v Speaker 1>the ball all over the places, Christian Watson, Alvi, Romeo

0:10:15.480 --> 0:10:18.079
<v Speaker 1>Dobbs back in the good graces. Jane Reid did pick

0:10:18.120 --> 0:10:20.040
<v Speaker 1>up an injury there, so that's one to watch. But

0:10:20.640 --> 0:10:23.680
<v Speaker 1>to me, the clear winner here is the over forty seven.

0:10:23.760 --> 0:10:25.320
<v Speaker 1>That's where I want to go for this one? Where

0:10:25.320 --> 0:10:26.280
<v Speaker 1>do you want to go? Andrew?

0:10:26.720 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think that the over is probably the play here.

0:10:29.840 --> 0:10:32.480
<v Speaker 3>Jordan Love is kind of one of those streaky quarterbacks

0:10:32.480 --> 0:10:34.360
<v Speaker 3>where it seems like he has one half of football

0:10:34.360 --> 0:10:37.079
<v Speaker 3>where he's absolutely amazing. Right the last two weeks, it's

0:10:37.120 --> 0:10:38.959
<v Speaker 3>been the second half where he's been amazing, and in

0:10:39.040 --> 0:10:40.839
<v Speaker 3>this past game it was the first half. And then

0:10:41.800 --> 0:10:44.400
<v Speaker 3>I'm like, twenty four to nothing, Why are the Cardinals

0:10:44.440 --> 0:10:45.720
<v Speaker 3>getting back in this game? Why are they just not

0:10:45.760 --> 0:10:48.839
<v Speaker 3>blowing out the Cardinals altogether? So I think that they

0:10:48.840 --> 0:10:51.360
<v Speaker 3>still just have too much offensive firepower. And I would

0:10:51.360 --> 0:10:53.560
<v Speaker 3>be maybe a little hesitant if Jaden Reid, you know,

0:10:53.600 --> 0:10:55.000
<v Speaker 3>ends up missing this game because he's one of their

0:10:55.040 --> 0:10:57.960
<v Speaker 3>biggest explosive playmakers. And you also don't have Nico Collins,

0:10:58.000 --> 0:10:59.760
<v Speaker 3>but that you know, the Texans didn't nessily miss him

0:10:59.760 --> 0:11:02.319
<v Speaker 3>against the Patriots. So yeah, I think for me, two

0:11:02.400 --> 0:11:06.800
<v Speaker 3>young quarterbacks sending offenses defenses that I think can be exposed,

0:11:06.800 --> 0:11:08.520
<v Speaker 3>I think, yeah, the over is probably the right move,

0:11:09.440 --> 0:11:09.840
<v Speaker 3>all right.

0:11:09.880 --> 0:11:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Next on the docket, we have the Atlanta Falcons who

0:11:12.640 --> 0:11:16.040
<v Speaker 1>are riding high. No traps for them. They're at home

0:11:16.080 --> 0:11:17.840
<v Speaker 1>taking on the Seahawks, who are now three and three

0:11:17.920 --> 0:11:21.719
<v Speaker 1>after Cinderella turned into a pumpkin and real competition showed up.

0:11:21.920 --> 0:11:24.720
<v Speaker 1>So Falcons continue to look really sharp here. The offense

0:11:24.760 --> 0:11:26.920
<v Speaker 1>is humming, everybody's getting work. I love to see what

0:11:26.960 --> 0:11:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Kirk Cousins is doing. Their three point favorites against Seattle.

0:11:30.160 --> 0:11:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Forty nine and a half is the number. It's a

0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:34.600
<v Speaker 1>pretty big number there plus one thirty on Seattle for

0:11:34.600 --> 0:11:37.360
<v Speaker 1>the money line. I will take the Falcons here with

0:11:37.400 --> 0:11:39.920
<v Speaker 1>the points and the three. I think they handle their business.

0:11:39.960 --> 0:11:43.240
<v Speaker 1>I think Seattle's got some holes. I think they're again

0:11:43.760 --> 0:11:46.600
<v Speaker 1>exactly who you look at. They're a mediocre team, and

0:11:46.840 --> 0:11:49.319
<v Speaker 1>I think they can beat the teams that are beneath them,

0:11:49.440 --> 0:11:51.319
<v Speaker 1>and I think any team that's got better personnel and

0:11:51.360 --> 0:11:53.079
<v Speaker 1>coaching ahead of them, they are going to lose to.

0:11:53.640 --> 0:11:55.880
<v Speaker 1>That kind of feels like the identity of the Seahawks

0:11:55.960 --> 0:11:57.920
<v Speaker 1>now that we are in Week seven. Do you agree

0:11:58.000 --> 0:11:58.959
<v Speaker 1>or disagree with that fact?

0:11:59.040 --> 0:12:01.720
<v Speaker 3>I would agree the Seattle Seahawks. We were kind of

0:12:01.920 --> 0:12:05.480
<v Speaker 3>always skeptical based on well, they're the cakewalk scheduled to

0:12:05.480 --> 0:12:08.000
<v Speaker 3>open the year. They're facing rookie quarterback after rookie quarterback

0:12:08.040 --> 0:12:10.240
<v Speaker 3>backups all over the place, and then when they've actually

0:12:10.280 --> 0:12:12.240
<v Speaker 3>played real opponents the last couple of weeks they have

0:12:12.600 --> 0:12:14.840
<v Speaker 3>fallen just short. So I mean, yeah, right now the

0:12:14.840 --> 0:12:17.680
<v Speaker 3>Falcons offenses, he's cooking right, Kirk Cousin looks really good.

0:12:17.679 --> 0:12:19.839
<v Speaker 3>The run game is getting going. They're kind of firing

0:12:19.840 --> 0:12:22.520
<v Speaker 3>on all facets. So I think right now, Atlanta at home.

0:12:22.559 --> 0:12:24.720
<v Speaker 3>I looked at this game and my projections at more

0:12:24.720 --> 0:12:28.240
<v Speaker 3>like Atlanta minus three and a half. So at minus three, yeah,

0:12:28.280 --> 0:12:30.160
<v Speaker 3>I like the Falcons at home. No.

0:12:30.280 --> 0:12:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Right. The next one we have is a great match

0:12:32.559 --> 0:12:35.320
<v Speaker 1>up here, the Minnesota Vikings, undefeated, fresh off the by

0:12:35.960 --> 0:12:38.200
<v Speaker 1>five and zero, taking on the Detroit Lions, who just

0:12:39.040 --> 0:12:42.080
<v Speaker 1>put on a clinic against the Cowboys. Just embarrassing. How

0:12:42.760 --> 0:12:44.880
<v Speaker 1>they keep getting their ass kicked at home and McCarthy's

0:12:44.880 --> 0:12:46.719
<v Speaker 1>allows a job. I don't know. I just I don't

0:12:46.760 --> 0:12:48.640
<v Speaker 1>know how it happened last year in the playoffs against

0:12:48.640 --> 0:12:52.880
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay, and it just keeps happening. This one's close.

0:12:52.960 --> 0:12:55.840
<v Speaker 1>The Vikings at home one and a half point favorites

0:12:55.880 --> 0:12:57.920
<v Speaker 1>at minus one. Ten fifty and a half is the

0:12:58.040 --> 0:13:00.839
<v Speaker 1>number even money on Detroit and the money line minus

0:13:00.880 --> 0:13:03.320
<v Speaker 1>won twenty four of the Minnesota Vikings to win. This

0:13:03.320 --> 0:13:05.440
<v Speaker 1>looks like a fun one. It's a very high total

0:13:05.559 --> 0:13:07.200
<v Speaker 1>fifty and a half. Do you think it lives up

0:13:07.200 --> 0:13:08.760
<v Speaker 1>to expectations, Andrew.

0:13:08.679 --> 0:13:09.240
<v Speaker 2>I don't think so.

0:13:09.559 --> 0:13:12.320
<v Speaker 3>I think that this is probably an underspot for me.

0:13:12.720 --> 0:13:15.719
<v Speaker 3>Looking at the Vikings. What's their strength, right, you look

0:13:15.720 --> 0:13:18.120
<v Speaker 3>at their defense. I know Sam Donald has played really well,

0:13:18.160 --> 0:13:19.800
<v Speaker 3>but he was a little bit more shaky in the

0:13:19.840 --> 0:13:22.880
<v Speaker 3>Jets matchup. They didn't necessarily fire on all cylinders in

0:13:22.920 --> 0:13:25.079
<v Speaker 3>that particular game, So maybe the Lions have Again, They're

0:13:25.080 --> 0:13:27.400
<v Speaker 3>gonna be aout eight Huchinson, so that's a big hurdle

0:13:27.440 --> 0:13:30.440
<v Speaker 3>for them to overcome defensively. But I think the Vikings

0:13:30.440 --> 0:13:33.320
<v Speaker 3>defense can definitely thrown off at Jared Goff where they

0:13:33.320 --> 0:13:36.000
<v Speaker 3>can actually stop the run, which the Dallas Cowboys cannot.

0:13:36.120 --> 0:13:39.640
<v Speaker 3>So if Detroit is running into stack boxes and not

0:13:39.679 --> 0:13:42.120
<v Speaker 3>necessarily picking up first down, you could see this game

0:13:42.200 --> 0:13:44.840
<v Speaker 3>stalling out a little bit. So again, at this number,

0:13:45.000 --> 0:13:47.920
<v Speaker 3>it's Jarreed Goff or Sam Darnold, right, that's what we're

0:13:47.920 --> 0:13:49.880
<v Speaker 3>expecting to be a fifty one point, fifty one and

0:13:49.880 --> 0:13:52.040
<v Speaker 3>a half point game. That seems a little aggressive to me,

0:13:52.160 --> 0:13:54.439
<v Speaker 3>So I like the under here just because the number

0:13:54.480 --> 0:13:56.640
<v Speaker 3>is is just so massive, And I want to ask

0:13:56.640 --> 0:13:59.720
<v Speaker 3>you something. Do you think that the Vikings are favored

0:13:59.720 --> 0:14:01.679
<v Speaker 3>because they're just undefeated and it's hey, you know, you

0:14:01.679 --> 0:14:03.480
<v Speaker 3>guys are undefeated, you haven't lost, you're playing at home.

0:14:03.520 --> 0:14:05.040
<v Speaker 3>That's why you are the favorites. Or do you think

0:14:05.040 --> 0:14:07.559
<v Speaker 3>they're actually the better team between the Vikings and Lines.

0:14:08.120 --> 0:14:09.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, this is an interesting one. That's a really

0:14:09.800 --> 0:14:12.360
<v Speaker 1>interesting question because I think the Vikings have started to

0:14:12.400 --> 0:14:14.079
<v Speaker 1>get tested a little bit. You know, that Jets game

0:14:14.120 --> 0:14:16.000
<v Speaker 1>was a little bit of a test for them. You know,

0:14:16.360 --> 0:14:18.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't think where they've caught certain teams. They've caught

0:14:18.840 --> 0:14:21.440
<v Speaker 1>them when they were down, I think, which has been beneficial.

0:14:21.480 --> 0:14:24.200
<v Speaker 1>But I think it's a matter of the Vikings defense

0:14:24.320 --> 0:14:26.640
<v Speaker 1>has been good. They're at home again, it's only one

0:14:26.640 --> 0:14:27.840
<v Speaker 1>and a half, so it's not like you're getting two

0:14:27.840 --> 0:14:30.880
<v Speaker 1>and a half or three here. So no matter what

0:14:30.920 --> 0:14:33.800
<v Speaker 1>we saw in the Detroit Lions this past week beating

0:14:33.840 --> 0:14:36.600
<v Speaker 1>up on Dallas, that doesn't necessarily carry over. This is

0:14:36.640 --> 0:14:39.000
<v Speaker 1>these are teams that know each other well in the division,

0:14:39.760 --> 0:14:41.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, tense situation. I think there's a lot of

0:14:41.880 --> 0:14:44.120
<v Speaker 1>reasons to favor I would be favoring Minnesota in this game.

0:14:44.160 --> 0:14:46.880
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly the line I would say, especially with Hutchinson out,

0:14:46.880 --> 0:14:49.360
<v Speaker 1>because when you lose that pass rush, you allow Sam

0:14:49.440 --> 0:14:52.120
<v Speaker 1>Darnold to complete more passes. And he's been able to

0:14:52.640 --> 0:14:54.320
<v Speaker 1>show you that he can sit there in the pocket

0:14:54.360 --> 0:14:57.600
<v Speaker 1>and deliver over and over again. So I think this

0:14:57.680 --> 0:14:59.480
<v Speaker 1>line is exactly right. The fifteen and a half does

0:14:59.520 --> 0:15:01.520
<v Speaker 1>seem a little large, and for an Indivision game, I

0:15:01.520 --> 0:15:03.480
<v Speaker 1>think I would shade the under two. But this is

0:15:03.520 --> 0:15:06.840
<v Speaker 1>another more of like a stay away from me or

0:15:07.040 --> 0:15:09.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, just kind of look at some props instead.

0:15:09.240 --> 0:15:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of props, there's no line you can set that

0:15:11.800 --> 0:15:13.840
<v Speaker 1>I won't go over on this week with Saekon Barkley.

0:15:14.160 --> 0:15:16.920
<v Speaker 1>None zero. You know why because he's going back to

0:15:16.960 --> 0:15:19.720
<v Speaker 1>New York to face the Giants. So the Giants are

0:15:19.720 --> 0:15:22.160
<v Speaker 1>four point underdog. Saquon Barkley comes into town. It gets

0:15:22.200 --> 0:15:26.200
<v Speaker 1>to remind everybody, Hey, remember me, I'm Saquon, I'm the franchise,

0:15:26.280 --> 0:15:28.240
<v Speaker 1>and you didn't want to pay me. This is a

0:15:28.440 --> 0:15:30.400
<v Speaker 1>now you talking about revenge game. To hear that nerves

0:15:30.480 --> 0:15:33.000
<v Speaker 1>so much in this what we do. This is a

0:15:33.040 --> 0:15:34.880
<v Speaker 1>revenge game. This is a I'm gonna stick it up

0:15:34.920 --> 0:15:37.360
<v Speaker 1>your rear end. This is why you sign with the Eagles,

0:15:37.520 --> 0:15:40.040
<v Speaker 1>because if you're Saquon Barkley for this moment in New York,

0:15:40.520 --> 0:15:42.000
<v Speaker 1>forty five and a half is a number. I don't

0:15:42.000 --> 0:15:45.120
<v Speaker 1>want that plus one seventy for the Giants. I certainly

0:15:45.160 --> 0:15:47.360
<v Speaker 1>don't want that. I don't even want the minus four

0:15:47.520 --> 0:15:49.840
<v Speaker 1>for the Eagles. All I want is Saquon Barkley in

0:15:49.880 --> 0:15:52.640
<v Speaker 1>this game, all the overs. I think that leans towards

0:15:52.640 --> 0:15:55.400
<v Speaker 1>a victory here for the Eagles, I would assume. But

0:15:55.560 --> 0:15:59.480
<v Speaker 1>my faith in Nick Sirianni is very very little at

0:15:59.480 --> 0:15:59.960
<v Speaker 1>this stage.

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:02.800
<v Speaker 2>Ericson, I mean, is it? He's going up talking smack

0:16:02.920 --> 0:16:05.400
<v Speaker 2>to his own face. What are we doing, dude?

0:16:05.400 --> 0:16:08.560
<v Speaker 1>In Philadelphia? No good can come of that. I lived

0:16:08.560 --> 0:16:12.000
<v Speaker 1>in Philly for six and a half years. Nothing, no

0:16:12.040 --> 0:16:14.760
<v Speaker 1>good can come of this. Nick, trust me, he's falling

0:16:14.800 --> 0:16:16.320
<v Speaker 1>apart with the Seams. I think he really is.

0:16:16.520 --> 0:16:19.600
<v Speaker 3>I really do so for me, Yeah, yeah, the Eagle

0:16:19.600 --> 0:16:23.000
<v Speaker 3>should win this game, but how many points is it by? Again,

0:16:23.040 --> 0:16:26.120
<v Speaker 3>the coaching matchup, I think Dabele's the better coach here,

0:16:26.160 --> 0:16:28.280
<v Speaker 3>So that doesn't make me feel great about backing Philly.

0:16:28.320 --> 0:16:30.440
<v Speaker 3>But I will say from the total perspective, I do

0:16:30.600 --> 0:16:33.160
<v Speaker 3>like the under. We saw the Giants defense play. I

0:16:33.200 --> 0:16:35.560
<v Speaker 3>mean they slowed down the Bengals offense. No one has

0:16:35.560 --> 0:16:36.880
<v Speaker 3>done that up to this point. As bad as the

0:16:36.880 --> 0:16:39.160
<v Speaker 3>Bengals defense has been, you know, the Giants defense was

0:16:39.200 --> 0:16:41.440
<v Speaker 3>able to slow them down and have answers for Jamar

0:16:41.480 --> 0:16:43.400
<v Speaker 3>ch Ase t Higgins in that run game to an extent.

0:16:43.560 --> 0:16:46.480
<v Speaker 3>So I think that with this Eagles offense still not

0:16:46.520 --> 0:16:48.600
<v Speaker 3>really finding its groove. Yes, sequel Mark is gonna have

0:16:48.640 --> 0:16:51.240
<v Speaker 3>his moments, but if they're running the football a lot,

0:16:51.440 --> 0:16:54.120
<v Speaker 3>does that mean they're going to score thirty points? Probably not.

0:16:54.320 --> 0:16:56.400
<v Speaker 3>So I like the under especially. I think I saw

0:16:56.440 --> 0:16:58.840
<v Speaker 3>it forty five and a half. That's my lean early on.

0:16:58.880 --> 0:17:01.240
<v Speaker 3>But I'm with you take on Barkley props, this is

0:17:01.240 --> 0:17:03.040
<v Speaker 3>what this is the week to hammer them, especially of

0:17:03.040 --> 0:17:04.000
<v Speaker 3>off a down week for him.

0:17:04.680 --> 0:17:08.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna set it it like I think it comes

0:17:08.840 --> 0:17:10.760
<v Speaker 1>in somewhere in like the eighty five eighty six and

0:17:10.760 --> 0:17:14.040
<v Speaker 1>a half, Like I think I think it's gonna be over,

0:17:14.119 --> 0:17:15.320
<v Speaker 1>like I just thought, I don't care what it is,

0:17:15.520 --> 0:17:18.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm still going over. I just I can't imagine I'm

0:17:18.840 --> 0:17:20.600
<v Speaker 1>not going for the Century market this game. I just can't.

0:17:20.640 --> 0:17:21.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to live in that world. I just

0:17:21.920 --> 0:17:24.359
<v Speaker 1>don't want to live it. Also, I don't want to

0:17:24.359 --> 0:17:26.199
<v Speaker 1>live in a world without the Betting Pros app to

0:17:26.240 --> 0:17:28.080
<v Speaker 1>help me make all the bets that I possibly can

0:17:28.160 --> 0:17:30.320
<v Speaker 1>the right way. So if you want to track any

0:17:30.320 --> 0:17:32.880
<v Speaker 1>line movements for any game, here download the Betting Pros

0:17:32.880 --> 0:17:35.920
<v Speaker 1>app for iOS or Android and you can automatically track

0:17:36.000 --> 0:17:38.320
<v Speaker 1>your bets across all the sports books. You can track

0:17:38.359 --> 0:17:40.439
<v Speaker 1>certain games to see how the lines are moving, like

0:17:40.440 --> 0:17:42.960
<v Speaker 1>that Colts game we talked about before. Now, what's that

0:17:43.040 --> 0:17:45.159
<v Speaker 1>gonna do? If it's Richardson not Flaco. This is the

0:17:45.200 --> 0:17:47.600
<v Speaker 1>way to stay on top of the lines at all times. Again,

0:17:47.640 --> 0:17:49.360
<v Speaker 1>you can follow us to a Betting pros dot com

0:17:49.359 --> 0:17:52.480
<v Speaker 1>slash ericson slash Joe as well. Let's get to the

0:17:52.520 --> 0:17:55.440
<v Speaker 1>next game on the docket for Week seven in the NFL,

0:17:55.880 --> 0:17:58.800
<v Speaker 1>and we have the Las Vegas rightas and the Los

0:17:58.800 --> 0:18:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Angeles Rams. Here we go, all right, The Rams are

0:18:03.119 --> 0:18:05.240
<v Speaker 1>four and a half point favors in this one, because well,

0:18:05.280 --> 0:18:10.280
<v Speaker 1>the biggest Raiders are having issues internally and externally existential crisis.

0:18:10.320 --> 0:18:12.000
<v Speaker 1>You might even say forty four and a half is

0:18:12.040 --> 0:18:15.600
<v Speaker 1>the total plus one eighty five. I like the Rams

0:18:15.600 --> 0:18:18.080
<v Speaker 1>to win this game, but I don't know if I

0:18:18.119 --> 0:18:19.919
<v Speaker 1>feel comfortable with the Rams of four and a half.

0:18:20.119 --> 0:18:21.960
<v Speaker 1>The Cooper Cup news is the one I'm waiting on.

0:18:22.160 --> 0:18:23.919
<v Speaker 1>That's the one that makes me feel warm and fuzzy.

0:18:23.920 --> 0:18:25.840
<v Speaker 1>But until I get to go ahead on that, if

0:18:25.880 --> 0:18:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Cup plays, I'll take the Rams with the four and

0:18:28.119 --> 0:18:30.920
<v Speaker 1>a half. If he doesn't, it might be a stay

0:18:30.960 --> 0:18:32.160
<v Speaker 1>away from me on this one too.

0:18:32.440 --> 0:18:35.360
<v Speaker 3>Ericson, I'm just going to the under. It's his two

0:18:35.400 --> 0:18:37.879
<v Speaker 3>teams when I'm not confident about either team. That's just

0:18:37.960 --> 0:18:40.320
<v Speaker 3>kind of my default when I look at these types

0:18:40.359 --> 0:18:43.080
<v Speaker 3>of matchups. Yes, they're playing in Los Angeles, but you're

0:18:43.080 --> 0:18:46.720
<v Speaker 3>gonna see eighty percent Raiders fans probably right in that stadium.

0:18:46.720 --> 0:18:47.440
<v Speaker 2>It's just gonna be.

0:18:47.520 --> 0:18:50.320
<v Speaker 3>Raider Nation, despite the fact that the team is spiraling

0:18:50.400 --> 0:18:53.760
<v Speaker 3>down and all their guys are hurt. Still, for me, yeah,

0:18:53.800 --> 0:18:55.080
<v Speaker 3>it's gonna be under at forty four.

0:18:55.960 --> 0:18:58.360
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So go with the under in this one from Andrew.

0:18:58.680 --> 0:19:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Next one here Carolina Washington now Washington four and two

0:19:02.680 --> 0:19:04.720
<v Speaker 1>got tested a little bit, saw some good things out

0:19:04.760 --> 0:19:07.120
<v Speaker 1>of the Washington Commanders, but they are eight point favorites.

0:19:07.920 --> 0:19:09.560
<v Speaker 1>We're living in a world where the Commanders are an

0:19:09.600 --> 0:19:11.800
<v Speaker 1>eight point favorite against the Carolina Panthers. Fifty one and

0:19:11.800 --> 0:19:14.280
<v Speaker 1>a half is the number Caroline on the upset line

0:19:14.359 --> 0:19:18.520
<v Speaker 1>would be three twenty eight plus money there, Andrew, I

0:19:18.600 --> 0:19:20.960
<v Speaker 1>like the Commanders, I might even say I really like

0:19:21.000 --> 0:19:24.560
<v Speaker 1>the Commanders, but eight is a big number. I know

0:19:24.640 --> 0:19:27.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm supposed to be your friend here, and I know

0:19:27.480 --> 0:19:30.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm supposed to keep you away from wanting to bet

0:19:30.160 --> 0:19:32.240
<v Speaker 1>the Carolina Panthers because you tell me every week stop

0:19:32.320 --> 0:19:34.600
<v Speaker 1>letting me do this, and friends shouldn't let friends do

0:19:34.680 --> 0:19:37.440
<v Speaker 1>this week in week out. But I feel like you're

0:19:37.440 --> 0:19:39.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna want the Panthers here? Am I right?

0:19:39.680 --> 0:19:39.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:19:39.920 --> 0:19:42.120
<v Speaker 3>No, you're here one hundred percent right here. I watch

0:19:42.200 --> 0:19:45.359
<v Speaker 3>the Panthers, but I just can't bring myself to do it.

0:19:45.400 --> 0:19:47.480
<v Speaker 3>So you're gonna have to be my guiding light here.

0:19:47.480 --> 0:19:49.080
<v Speaker 3>You gonna have to be like, hey, it's eight and

0:19:49.119 --> 0:19:50.720
<v Speaker 3>a half. If it goes to nine and a half,

0:19:50.760 --> 0:19:52.560
<v Speaker 3>because no one wants to bet on the Panthers except me,

0:19:53.200 --> 0:19:55.000
<v Speaker 3>and then you gotta give me the green light. So Joey,

0:19:55.040 --> 0:19:56.800
<v Speaker 3>we're gonna have to just wait and see how this

0:19:56.880 --> 0:19:58.679
<v Speaker 3>line moves throughout the week, so I got to how

0:19:58.680 --> 0:20:01.840
<v Speaker 3>the betting CROs apt fall that line movement. So and

0:20:01.920 --> 0:20:04.760
<v Speaker 3>the total, what'd you say was forty not fifty one

0:20:04.760 --> 0:20:05.160
<v Speaker 3>and a half?

0:20:05.200 --> 0:20:08.119
<v Speaker 1>Forty fifty one and a half is the consensus aros

0:20:08.200 --> 0:20:08.520
<v Speaker 1>right now.

0:20:08.560 --> 0:20:10.919
<v Speaker 3>That is so such a big number for it's a

0:20:11.000 --> 0:20:13.640
<v Speaker 3>huge number. I get the defenses aren't good, but.

0:20:13.840 --> 0:20:16.359
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's what it is. The defense aren't good, and

0:20:16.400 --> 0:20:19.040
<v Speaker 1>you do have some playmakers there, but like Cuba's played

0:20:19.040 --> 0:20:21.879
<v Speaker 1>relatively well this year, you know, like it's been a

0:20:21.880 --> 0:20:25.040
<v Speaker 1>fun new piece here. The Terry mcclaurin looks like, you know,

0:20:25.080 --> 0:20:27.200
<v Speaker 1>he's back on track after a slow start to the season.

0:20:27.920 --> 0:20:29.760
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot to like here in this game. Fifty

0:20:29.800 --> 0:20:32.359
<v Speaker 1>one and a half is huge, but I think I

0:20:32.359 --> 0:20:36.400
<v Speaker 1>would still go with the over here because Washington's defense

0:20:36.440 --> 0:20:40.000
<v Speaker 1>still has holes in it, and I think the explosiveness

0:20:40.040 --> 0:20:42.160
<v Speaker 1>of what Jadan Daniels can do against Carolina at home,

0:20:42.200 --> 0:20:44.359
<v Speaker 1>I think is a really good situation. Eight is a

0:20:44.359 --> 0:20:47.399
<v Speaker 1>lot to cover. But there's also a scenario where you know,

0:20:47.480 --> 0:20:49.160
<v Speaker 1>they beat the hell out of them, right, and they

0:20:49.160 --> 0:20:50.919
<v Speaker 1>go to thirty five points, and if they go to

0:20:50.960 --> 0:20:54.040
<v Speaker 1>thirty five then the implied team total of the Carolina

0:20:54.080 --> 0:20:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Panthers should take you over. But we'll see.

0:20:56.840 --> 0:20:58.679
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, this one is uh, I'm gonna have to do

0:20:58.720 --> 0:21:00.159
<v Speaker 3>some more research on this one.

0:21:00.800 --> 0:21:03.360
<v Speaker 1>All right? How about a rematch of the Super Bowl?

0:21:03.400 --> 0:21:05.160
<v Speaker 1>You like this one? The forty nine Ers at home

0:21:05.200 --> 0:21:07.240
<v Speaker 1>one and a half waid favorites against the undefeated Kansas

0:21:07.280 --> 0:21:10.640
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs. But are they a paper tiger? Forty six

0:21:10.680 --> 0:21:12.760
<v Speaker 1>and a half is the number minus one oh five

0:21:12.760 --> 0:21:15.000
<v Speaker 1>on the money line for the Chiefs minus won ten

0:21:15.520 --> 0:21:17.960
<v Speaker 1>for San Francisco. My brain goes to the money line

0:21:17.960 --> 0:21:20.800
<v Speaker 1>here and just what team you like more? Now you

0:21:20.800 --> 0:21:23.359
<v Speaker 1>know Jordan Mason's injury seems like he's going to play

0:21:23.359 --> 0:21:26.520
<v Speaker 1>through that. This is the revenge game again for the

0:21:26.520 --> 0:21:29.040
<v Speaker 1>forty nine ers, but you know Andy Reid coming off

0:21:29.040 --> 0:21:32.120
<v Speaker 1>a bye with more time to prepare. Sorry, kids, give

0:21:32.160 --> 0:21:34.399
<v Speaker 1>me Kansas City to find another way to win at

0:21:34.400 --> 0:21:35.119
<v Speaker 1>minus one oh five.

0:21:35.119 --> 0:21:37.440
<v Speaker 3>Of your thoughts, I mean, if you just keep betting

0:21:37.440 --> 0:21:39.960
<v Speaker 3>Patrick Mahomes as an underdog, you just make money. That's

0:21:40.119 --> 0:21:42.320
<v Speaker 3>that's basically that was the trend last year when they

0:21:42.359 --> 0:21:44.760
<v Speaker 3>were just underdog after underdog and you just kep betting

0:21:44.760 --> 0:21:45.760
<v Speaker 3>on Patrick Mahomes just kept me.

0:21:46.040 --> 0:21:47.840
<v Speaker 1>And I did it here in this channel. Anybody was

0:21:47.840 --> 0:21:50.880
<v Speaker 1>here for that ride. Last year. I went on monologue

0:21:50.880 --> 0:21:53.919
<v Speaker 1>after monologue about why you should be betting Patrick Mahomes,

0:21:53.960 --> 0:21:55.879
<v Speaker 1>and if you did it, you won a lot of

0:21:55.880 --> 0:21:58.160
<v Speaker 1>money last year for the playoffs and into the super Bowl.

0:21:58.160 --> 0:22:01.600
<v Speaker 3>The easiest way to not enjoy Sunday Football is to

0:22:01.640 --> 0:22:04.040
<v Speaker 3>bet against Patrick Mahomes, as I learned last Monday Night

0:22:04.040 --> 0:22:07.120
<v Speaker 3>when they destroyed the Saints. So just don't fall into

0:22:07.119 --> 0:22:08.960
<v Speaker 3>the trap. I get that the Chiefs are eventually gonna

0:22:09.000 --> 0:22:10.359
<v Speaker 3>lose a game at some point. I know that they

0:22:10.359 --> 0:22:13.480
<v Speaker 3>haven't been firing on all cylinders, as I've said many

0:22:13.480 --> 0:22:16.639
<v Speaker 3>times out the show, but they just find ways to

0:22:16.640 --> 0:22:19.040
<v Speaker 3>win games. And the forty nine ers they just have problems.

0:22:19.080 --> 0:22:21.000
<v Speaker 3>I know that they look better it gets the Seahawks

0:22:21.000 --> 0:22:22.359
<v Speaker 3>on Thursday Night. They're coming off a little bit of

0:22:22.440 --> 0:22:25.280
<v Speaker 3>extended rest as well. But Haindy reread off the buy

0:22:25.800 --> 0:22:27.560
<v Speaker 3>Chiefs underdog. These are the things you just want to

0:22:27.600 --> 0:22:29.720
<v Speaker 3>trust in and you want to bet on. So I

0:22:29.760 --> 0:22:32.680
<v Speaker 3>think for me, I agree with you with k Kent City.

0:22:32.760 --> 0:22:36.239
<v Speaker 1>All Right, Sunday Night football, Pittsburgh, New York, Right, New

0:22:36.320 --> 0:22:38.160
<v Speaker 1>York Jets will see what they do with their new

0:22:38.160 --> 0:22:42.440
<v Speaker 1>play caller. See how exciting that becomes. Steelers got back

0:22:42.480 --> 0:22:45.040
<v Speaker 1>on track, big road win for them. Fields is not

0:22:45.040 --> 0:22:47.720
<v Speaker 1>giving up that job, folks. Sorry, anybody who's looking for

0:22:47.760 --> 0:22:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Russell Wilson that it happened minus one and a half

0:22:49.880 --> 0:22:52.359
<v Speaker 1>for Pittsburgh. That feels right to me. Thirty seven and

0:22:52.359 --> 0:22:54.200
<v Speaker 1>a half excuse me, just thirty seven right now is

0:22:54.200 --> 0:22:56.480
<v Speaker 1>actually the number even money on the Jets money line.

0:22:57.600 --> 0:23:00.480
<v Speaker 1>I see Pittsburgh, I see the Jets, I see you know,

0:23:00.760 --> 0:23:03.720
<v Speaker 1>evening game. I see Under. I just can't help but

0:23:03.840 --> 0:23:05.879
<v Speaker 1>go that route. What do you think here? I know

0:23:05.880 --> 0:23:07.840
<v Speaker 1>it's a low one. Can it scoot still? Under?

0:23:09.240 --> 0:23:12.080
<v Speaker 3>I think it should. But we see wacky things happen again.

0:23:12.160 --> 0:23:14.240
<v Speaker 3>The Patriots Texans game, right that game was at their

0:23:14.240 --> 0:23:16.120
<v Speaker 3>eight and a half two, and that game soared over

0:23:16.160 --> 0:23:18.600
<v Speaker 3>the total because you had explosive plays from both sides

0:23:18.640 --> 0:23:19.800
<v Speaker 3>of the field. You have a lot of turnovers, right,

0:23:19.800 --> 0:23:21.879
<v Speaker 3>turnovers is always kind of throws a wrench in the

0:23:21.880 --> 0:23:23.600
<v Speaker 3>plan with you get short fields, and that's how you

0:23:23.600 --> 0:23:24.320
<v Speaker 3>get a lot.

0:23:24.160 --> 0:23:26.199
<v Speaker 2>Of points even with two strong defenses.

0:23:26.240 --> 0:23:28.320
<v Speaker 3>So I guess for me, I'm trying to figure out

0:23:28.480 --> 0:23:31.680
<v Speaker 3>where is the value proposition. So the Steelers are favorites

0:23:31.720 --> 0:23:35.400
<v Speaker 3>at home. If the Jets play well, play better on

0:23:35.560 --> 0:23:38.639
<v Speaker 3>Monday Night football against the Bills, then you'll get some

0:23:38.720 --> 0:23:39.280
<v Speaker 3>Jets love.

0:23:39.359 --> 0:23:39.600
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:23:39.920 --> 0:23:41.399
<v Speaker 3>So I think that if you want to bet on

0:23:41.440 --> 0:23:44.320
<v Speaker 3>the Steelers, you probably just want to wait and bet

0:23:44.320 --> 0:23:46.200
<v Speaker 3>on the Steelers after the Jets. I just because I

0:23:46.200 --> 0:23:47.679
<v Speaker 3>think their office is going to be better no matter what,

0:23:47.920 --> 0:23:50.080
<v Speaker 3>it just has to be better, especially against the Bills defense.

0:23:50.200 --> 0:23:52.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm just waiting for the Jets tonight to see a

0:23:52.080 --> 0:23:55.840
<v Speaker 1>little bit of what's new, if anything. I mean, I imagine

0:23:55.680 --> 0:23:58.440
<v Speaker 1>more breeze Hall and less throw the football. But it's

0:23:58.480 --> 0:24:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Rodgers. Can't count on that. Baltimore, Tampa Bay Tampa.

0:24:04.240 --> 0:24:06.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, Baker Mayfield out there throwing blocks Like I

0:24:07.080 --> 0:24:09.480
<v Speaker 1>just you know, if you like football, you don't like

0:24:09.520 --> 0:24:11.919
<v Speaker 1>Baker Mayfield. I don't know, like something's wrong with you.

0:24:12.119 --> 0:24:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Like that guy's fun. They are four and a half

0:24:14.880 --> 0:24:17.360
<v Speaker 1>point underdogs though against the Baltimore Ravens who come into town.

0:24:17.359 --> 0:24:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Now this is interesting to me because I think Tampa

0:24:20.880 --> 0:24:23.040
<v Speaker 1>is like, hey, let's go, We're ready for this test.

0:24:23.640 --> 0:24:25.680
<v Speaker 1>I think this is a close game. I think it's

0:24:25.680 --> 0:24:28.600
<v Speaker 1>a little too much to give Baltimore. I actually like

0:24:28.680 --> 0:24:30.359
<v Speaker 1>Tampa here with the four and a half, fifty and

0:24:30.400 --> 0:24:33.280
<v Speaker 1>a half high number again variables in this game plus

0:24:33.320 --> 0:24:35.280
<v Speaker 1>one seventy on the money line for Tampa, and that's

0:24:35.280 --> 0:24:36.560
<v Speaker 1>not the round I'm going. But it is a Monday

0:24:36.640 --> 0:24:40.959
<v Speaker 1>night game. Baker Mayfield and the Tampa Buccaneers continue to respond.

0:24:41.000 --> 0:24:43.000
<v Speaker 1>I think the challenge you have to challenge. They are

0:24:43.040 --> 0:24:45.960
<v Speaker 1>four and two, same record as the Baltimore Ravens. They've

0:24:45.960 --> 0:24:48.760
<v Speaker 1>had some hiccups, same as the Baltimore Ravens. The Ravens

0:24:48.760 --> 0:24:51.200
<v Speaker 1>are running the football very well. Maybe that's where you

0:24:51.240 --> 0:24:53.399
<v Speaker 1>want to point to the under here, just sucking clock

0:24:53.480 --> 0:24:55.119
<v Speaker 1>a little bit here, But what are your thoughts on

0:24:55.160 --> 0:24:57.960
<v Speaker 1>this one. I'm leaning towards taking the points right now

0:24:58.000 --> 0:24:59.960
<v Speaker 1>early on with Tampa at the four and a half.

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:02.520
<v Speaker 3>I think that the Buccaneers match up really well with

0:25:02.560 --> 0:25:04.360
<v Speaker 3>what the Ravens want to do offensively. Right you look

0:25:04.359 --> 0:25:06.679
<v Speaker 3>at the Ravens on the football, what's the Buccaneers strength

0:25:07.359 --> 0:25:09.760
<v Speaker 3>against every Like Todd Bowles, what is he known for

0:25:10.040 --> 0:25:12.960
<v Speaker 3>stopping the run? I got Vidavea, I got Colajakantci, what

0:25:13.119 --> 0:25:15.600
<v Speaker 3>Kamara did nothing against this Buccaneers defense. I get it's

0:25:15.640 --> 0:25:18.399
<v Speaker 3>a different running attack with Derek Henry and Lamar Jackson.

0:25:18.400 --> 0:25:20.800
<v Speaker 3>You can never fully stop it, but it's not going

0:25:20.840 --> 0:25:23.080
<v Speaker 3>to be necessarily two hundred total rushing arts because tamp

0:25:23.080 --> 0:25:24.480
<v Speaker 3>Bay is going to do everything that they can to

0:25:24.560 --> 0:25:26.800
<v Speaker 3>try to stop this running attack. And mean, you look

0:25:26.800 --> 0:25:30.399
<v Speaker 3>at offensively, Baker Mayfield and these receivers. I mean, the

0:25:30.440 --> 0:25:32.639
<v Speaker 3>Ravens secondary is not that great. That's all they've been

0:25:32.640 --> 0:25:34.800
<v Speaker 3>doing up is giving up chunky yardage two wide receivers

0:25:34.840 --> 0:25:35.560
<v Speaker 3>week in and week out.

0:25:35.560 --> 0:25:36.680
<v Speaker 2>They're good against the run. Two.

0:25:36.800 --> 0:25:40.080
<v Speaker 3>So again, if you have both teams now operating with

0:25:40.200 --> 0:25:42.680
<v Speaker 3>we need to pass the ball, maybe you get a shootout.

0:25:42.720 --> 0:25:44.800
<v Speaker 3>And whenever it's a shootout, it usually comes down to

0:25:44.840 --> 0:25:46.040
<v Speaker 3>who has the ball at the end of the game.

0:25:46.080 --> 0:25:48.000
<v Speaker 3>And Baker Mayfield, Hey, this is the same draft class, right,

0:25:48.040 --> 0:25:50.920
<v Speaker 3>Baker Mayfield won overall in this draft and Lamar Jackson

0:25:50.920 --> 0:25:52.879
<v Speaker 3>got picked up the end of the first round. So again,

0:25:52.960 --> 0:25:55.160
<v Speaker 3>not a rivalry that we really think about, but hey,

0:25:55.200 --> 0:25:57.120
<v Speaker 3>both these quarterbacks want to show up in this match.

0:25:57.119 --> 0:25:59.520
<v Speaker 3>I mean, like you said, Mayfield, the swagger is back.

0:25:59.680 --> 0:26:02.080
<v Speaker 3>It's how much fun watching him play now? He's scrambling,

0:26:02.160 --> 0:26:04.440
<v Speaker 3>he's throwing block, he's throwing haymakers.

0:26:04.520 --> 0:26:07.880
<v Speaker 1>He's downfield throwing blocks there like on the opposite side

0:26:07.880 --> 0:26:09.800
<v Speaker 1>of the field of where the play started. Like I

0:26:09.880 --> 0:26:13.600
<v Speaker 1>just I don't know. Man, Like Baker early on was

0:26:13.640 --> 0:26:15.880
<v Speaker 1>a little obnoxious, you know, in college, Like I get

0:26:15.920 --> 0:26:18.040
<v Speaker 1>all that, but at this point, what he's evolved into,

0:26:18.720 --> 0:26:20.800
<v Speaker 1>I feel a football man. It's tough not to enjoy

0:26:20.840 --> 0:26:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Baker Mayfield's performance Arizona at home, last game of two

0:26:25.640 --> 0:26:29.199
<v Speaker 1>Monday night games. The Los Angeles Chargers are gonna go

0:26:29.280 --> 0:26:33.720
<v Speaker 1>to Arizona, Arizona two and a half point home underdogs.

0:26:33.720 --> 0:26:35.640
<v Speaker 1>That feels right to me. Forty two and a half

0:26:35.680 --> 0:26:38.440
<v Speaker 1>is the number, and then plus one and fourteen for Arizona.

0:26:38.480 --> 0:26:41.040
<v Speaker 1>That's always the same question every week, which Arizona Cardinals

0:26:41.080 --> 0:26:44.240
<v Speaker 1>team shows up, Which Kyler Murray shows up. I know

0:26:44.280 --> 0:26:48.119
<v Speaker 1>which Charger team shows up. And I keep pitting against

0:26:48.119 --> 0:26:50.119
<v Speaker 1>the Chargers and I keep losing. So I'm just gonna stop.

0:26:50.800 --> 0:26:54.240
<v Speaker 1>That is my kryptonite this year. It's taken me six weeks.

0:26:54.680 --> 0:26:57.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm over it now. My upset special got blown apart

0:26:57.840 --> 0:27:01.000
<v Speaker 1>by the Chargers. So Chargers, congratulations, you have my respect.

0:27:01.240 --> 0:27:02.960
<v Speaker 1>I will take the Chargers in the two and a half.

0:27:03.240 --> 0:27:04.520
<v Speaker 1>See you later your thoughts.

0:27:04.920 --> 0:27:07.520
<v Speaker 3>I like the over in this game. Arizona is the

0:27:07.600 --> 0:27:09.960
<v Speaker 3>home the desert. This is where shootouts happen. How do

0:27:09.960 --> 0:27:12.159
<v Speaker 3>you beat the Arizona Cardinals. You run the ball down

0:27:12.200 --> 0:27:13.879
<v Speaker 3>their throats. What do the Chargers want to do more

0:27:13.880 --> 0:27:16.359
<v Speaker 3>than anything else is run the ball down their opponent's throats.

0:27:16.400 --> 0:27:19.560
<v Speaker 3>So you have Justin Herbert connecting on key throws. Herbert

0:27:19.600 --> 0:27:22.639
<v Speaker 3>looked healthy in last week's game, so I'm encouraged by that.

0:27:22.760 --> 0:27:25.120
<v Speaker 3>And yeah, he doesn't have a lot of playmakers anymore.

0:27:25.160 --> 0:27:28.080
<v Speaker 3>But when he's after that wheel route that he hit

0:27:28.160 --> 0:27:30.840
<v Speaker 3>with Kamani Videl, an absolute beauty of a throw, and

0:27:30.880 --> 0:27:32.960
<v Speaker 3>you're like, oh, yeah, that's Justin Herbert that we all

0:27:32.960 --> 0:27:34.800
<v Speaker 3>know and love. That's really good when he has the

0:27:34.800 --> 0:27:36.520
<v Speaker 3>ball in his hands. Just he doesn't get that many

0:27:36.560 --> 0:27:39.680
<v Speaker 3>opportunities to throw anymore. But in a game where Arizona,

0:27:39.800 --> 0:27:41.800
<v Speaker 3>again playing at home, I like their offense to function

0:27:41.800 --> 0:27:44.160
<v Speaker 3>a little bit better. Here Colin Murray running around scrambling,

0:27:44.359 --> 0:27:45.639
<v Speaker 3>So I think they may be getting over here at

0:27:45.680 --> 0:27:46.400
<v Speaker 3>forty two and a half.

0:27:47.040 --> 0:27:50.040
<v Speaker 1>All right, now, reminder, everybody betting pro systems are out

0:27:50.040 --> 0:27:52.280
<v Speaker 1>there too to help you. That new tool, it's our

0:27:52.280 --> 0:27:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Betting Pro Systems tool. It's designed up you find winning

0:27:54.680 --> 0:27:57.119
<v Speaker 1>strategies so you can make smarter bets. You customize your

0:27:57.119 --> 0:28:00.280
<v Speaker 1>betting systems by sport, my bet type, and timeframe to

0:28:00.320 --> 0:28:03.840
<v Speaker 1>find the best opportunities using real time data and expert analysis.

0:28:03.880 --> 0:28:07.000
<v Speaker 1>So track your performance of different betting systems over time

0:28:07.040 --> 0:28:09.600
<v Speaker 1>and optimize your bets to increase your chances of success.

0:28:09.760 --> 0:28:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Download the Betting Pros app today and elevate your betting

0:28:12.760 --> 0:28:16.119
<v Speaker 1>strategy and start betting smarter, not harder again. Sink your

0:28:16.119 --> 0:28:19.080
<v Speaker 1>sportsbooks for free and check out the contest too. That

0:28:19.200 --> 0:28:21.399
<v Speaker 1>jersey is not going to give away itself, so go

0:28:21.480 --> 0:28:24.159
<v Speaker 1>to Bettingpros dot com slash contest today. That'll do it

0:28:24.200 --> 0:28:26.240
<v Speaker 1>for us, But the story of the game goes on

0:28:26.280 --> 0:28:29.679
<v Speaker 1>for Andrew ericson. I'm Joey p. We'll see you next time. Kids.

0:28:30.240 --> 0:28:32.879
<v Speaker 4>Thanks for listening to the Betting Pros podcast. If you

0:28:32.920 --> 0:28:35.280
<v Speaker 4>love the show, the best freeway to support us is

0:28:35.320 --> 0:28:38.720
<v Speaker 4>by leaving a positive review on Apple Podcasts or Spotify.

0:28:39.000 --> 0:28:41.640
<v Speaker 4>Follow us on x and TikTok at Betting Pros and

0:28:41.720 --> 0:28:45.400
<v Speaker 4>Instagram at Betting Pros NFL also subscribe to our YouTube

0:28:45.440 --> 0:28:53.920
<v Speaker 4>channel at YouTube dot com Slash Betting Pros