1 00:00:00,120 --> 00:00:04,560 Speaker 1: Elon Musk has to hand over information about potential investors 2 00:00:04,600 --> 00:00:06,960 Speaker 1: in the forty four billion dollar buyout of Twitter that 3 00:00:07,040 --> 00:00:10,039 Speaker 1: he's now trying to cancel. Joining us to talk about 4 00:00:10,119 --> 00:00:14,520 Speaker 1: this more. Jeff Feeley, Bloomberg Legal reporter, So, Jeff, this 5 00:00:14,560 --> 00:00:18,360 Speaker 1: is the latest twist in this long running saga. Now, 6 00:00:18,440 --> 00:00:21,120 Speaker 1: what is the significance of this and who are these 7 00:00:21,120 --> 00:00:26,040 Speaker 1: potential investors we're talking about, Paul. These guys are folks 8 00:00:26,079 --> 00:00:30,400 Speaker 1: that are friends or colleagues of Mr Musk who have 9 00:00:30,560 --> 00:00:35,479 Speaker 1: discussed potentially throwing in with him in there set more 10 00:00:35,520 --> 00:00:38,559 Speaker 1: than seven billion dollar equity race he did for the 11 00:00:38,600 --> 00:00:43,800 Speaker 1: Twitter deal. Uh, these folks names. He's resisted turning over 12 00:00:43,840 --> 00:00:47,720 Speaker 1: these names, saying that they don't have any real substitutive 13 00:00:47,800 --> 00:00:50,319 Speaker 1: knowledge of the deal. But the judge says he's got 14 00:00:50,320 --> 00:00:54,600 Speaker 1: to hand him over anyway. That's one interesting angle. And 15 00:00:54,640 --> 00:00:59,680 Speaker 1: then this whistleblower complaint from a former executive, Peter z 16 00:01:00,040 --> 00:01:03,600 Speaker 1: Co is interesting too about deficient deficiencies. And we saw 17 00:01:03,600 --> 00:01:05,840 Speaker 1: a big drop in the in the share price down 18 00:01:05,920 --> 00:01:09,640 Speaker 1: seven point three percent in Twitter today. That's a long 19 00:01:09,680 --> 00:01:13,760 Speaker 1: way from the fifty four dollars that Elon Musk originally 20 00:01:13,920 --> 00:01:16,720 Speaker 1: was was offering to pay. Does this make it more 21 00:01:16,840 --> 00:01:20,880 Speaker 1: likely that Musk gets a gets more favorable treatment from 22 00:01:20,880 --> 00:01:25,000 Speaker 1: the judge. Well, it's too early to tell. We really 23 00:01:25,040 --> 00:01:28,280 Speaker 1: don't know at this point whether this gentleman has the 24 00:01:28,280 --> 00:01:31,119 Speaker 1: goods or it's just a case of sour grapes. He 25 00:01:31,200 --> 00:01:36,080 Speaker 1: was fired by Twitter over performance issues. Uh, we really 26 00:01:36,160 --> 00:01:38,640 Speaker 1: just it's going to take time to flesh this out. 27 00:01:38,840 --> 00:01:42,800 Speaker 1: So I think everybody needs to stay tuned. One of 28 00:01:42,840 --> 00:01:45,959 Speaker 1: the people that is getting sucked into this voltics as well, 29 00:01:46,080 --> 00:01:49,280 Speaker 1: Jack Dorsey, has been subpoenaed. Of course, he's a friend 30 00:01:49,280 --> 00:01:51,720 Speaker 1: of Elon Musk. He's a form of Twitter CEO as well. 31 00:01:51,800 --> 00:01:54,800 Speaker 1: That might there be some split loyalties here for Jack Dorsey. 32 00:01:54,880 --> 00:01:58,360 Speaker 1: What's he likely to say? I don't think there is. 33 00:01:58,400 --> 00:02:00,600 Speaker 1: I think Jack Dorsey is one of the folks in 34 00:02:00,640 --> 00:02:03,960 Speaker 1: this case who would likely be subpoenaed by both sides 35 00:02:04,000 --> 00:02:08,440 Speaker 1: to testify. He is basically one of the folks who 36 00:02:09,200 --> 00:02:12,040 Speaker 1: uh served as an advisor for Mr Musk when he 37 00:02:12,120 --> 00:02:15,360 Speaker 1: was considering whether to make the bid for Twitter. It's 38 00:02:15,400 --> 00:02:18,880 Speaker 1: pretty clear that Mr Musk would have preferred Mr Dorsey 39 00:02:18,919 --> 00:02:22,320 Speaker 1: stay on the board and served sort of as his 40 00:02:22,320 --> 00:02:25,720 Speaker 1: his proxy, his voice but that wasn't to be Mr. 41 00:02:26,160 --> 00:02:30,680 Speaker 1: Mr Dorsey has sort of moved on, so we're likely 42 00:02:30,760 --> 00:02:34,520 Speaker 1: to hear from Mr Dorsey at trial in October. I 43 00:02:34,560 --> 00:02:37,040 Speaker 1: wanted to go back to the whistle blower because apparently 44 00:02:37,080 --> 00:02:41,280 Speaker 1: it's serious enough that lawmakers have have vowed to investigate, 45 00:02:41,360 --> 00:02:47,000 Speaker 1: and even in our talking about national security implications in 46 00:02:47,120 --> 00:02:50,240 Speaker 1: terms of what this gentleman, the former executive, has said, 47 00:02:50,440 --> 00:02:55,720 Speaker 1: how subjective are some of the charges. Well, I mean, again, 48 00:02:56,240 --> 00:02:58,920 Speaker 1: it depends on which side of the hour you're standing on. 49 00:02:59,760 --> 00:03:03,920 Speaker 1: For were the Twitter side they've said that basically, you know, 50 00:03:04,000 --> 00:03:07,480 Speaker 1: there's plenty of inconsistencies and inaccuracies in what he has 51 00:03:07,560 --> 00:03:11,160 Speaker 1: said that he has motivated, you know, by a desire 52 00:03:11,200 --> 00:03:13,840 Speaker 1: to hurt the company. On the Musk side, you know, 53 00:03:13,919 --> 00:03:16,440 Speaker 1: this guy is the former head of security for Twitter 54 00:03:16,600 --> 00:03:21,000 Speaker 1: computer security, so not a small job, especially for a 55 00:03:21,080 --> 00:03:26,560 Speaker 1: social media platform. And you know, I mean, it's really 56 00:03:26,560 --> 00:03:29,760 Speaker 1: going to come down to how this plays with the judge. 57 00:03:30,360 --> 00:03:32,840 Speaker 1: This is all a judge in Delaware is going to 58 00:03:32,960 --> 00:03:35,960 Speaker 1: make the final call on whether Mr Musk was justified 59 00:03:36,000 --> 00:03:39,080 Speaker 1: in walking away or not. Well, that trial now a 60 00:03:39,120 --> 00:03:41,760 Speaker 1: little under two months away. What are the chances that 61 00:03:41,800 --> 00:03:43,840 Speaker 1: it gets sailed in advance and we never make it 62 00:03:43,920 --> 00:03:48,280 Speaker 1: to court. There's some talk about that. You know, there's 63 00:03:48,280 --> 00:03:52,280 Speaker 1: the question as to whether Twitter really wants to have 64 00:03:52,400 --> 00:03:56,200 Speaker 1: Elon Musk, you know, as its owner in the endgame. Uh. 65 00:03:57,080 --> 00:03:59,520 Speaker 1: Mr Musk has made it clear that he really is 66 00:03:59,760 --> 00:04:03,960 Speaker 1: not not all that interested. He's got buyer's remorse. I 67 00:04:04,000 --> 00:04:07,520 Speaker 1: could see a settlement. It's it's Uh, it's certainly in 68 00:04:07,600 --> 00:04:13,120 Speaker 1: both sides interests and j Jeff, is it Do we 69 00:04:13,200 --> 00:04:16,479 Speaker 1: know for sure that he wants out? It seems like it, 70 00:04:16,640 --> 00:04:20,320 Speaker 1: But it could be that a much lower price, um, 71 00:04:20,360 --> 00:04:25,160 Speaker 1: you know, has been the motivating motivating factor all along. Uh, 72 00:04:25,320 --> 00:04:26,800 Speaker 1: you know, what can you tell us on that front? 73 00:04:27,839 --> 00:04:30,560 Speaker 1: Does anyone really have any insight into the mind of 74 00:04:30,600 --> 00:04:35,440 Speaker 1: Elon Musk? Uh, It's it's you know, it's just hard 75 00:04:35,480 --> 00:04:39,479 Speaker 1: to tell whether this has all been negotiation by lawsuit 76 00:04:39,960 --> 00:04:42,280 Speaker 1: or he really wants to put on his shoes and 77 00:04:42,320 --> 00:04:46,359 Speaker 1: make the move again. Only the future will tell us that. 78 00:04:46,960 --> 00:04:50,159 Speaker 1: You know, Jeff, from your from your commentary and from 79 00:04:50,160 --> 00:04:52,960 Speaker 1: your approach, it seems like you're a bit fed up 80 00:04:53,000 --> 00:04:55,560 Speaker 1: with this. I mean, is this a confusing and and 81 00:04:55,640 --> 00:04:59,960 Speaker 1: sort of frustrating story to cover? It's a very interesting 82 00:05:00,080 --> 00:05:03,080 Speaker 1: story to cover. It's one of the things that we 83 00:05:03,160 --> 00:05:05,080 Speaker 1: do a lot in Delaware, a lot of m and 84 00:05:05,120 --> 00:05:08,800 Speaker 1: a litigation in Delaware. But he's killing my summer, you 85 00:05:08,839 --> 00:05:13,720 Speaker 1: know what I mean? You know anyway, now now I 86 00:05:13,839 --> 00:05:16,040 Speaker 1: I you know, I love it. But again he's skill 87 00:05:16,120 --> 00:05:19,359 Speaker 1: in my summer. One of the things he's complaining about 88 00:05:19,360 --> 00:05:22,960 Speaker 1: Elon Muska is being hounded about casual conversations that he 89 00:05:23,000 --> 00:05:25,360 Speaker 1: had about this Twitter deal. But he does say all 90 00:05:25,480 --> 00:05:28,080 Speaker 1: kinds of things as you mentioned there, you know, for example, 91 00:05:28,200 --> 00:05:32,520 Speaker 1: taking tessela private buying Manchester United. These these two seem 92 00:05:32,600 --> 00:05:34,760 Speaker 1: to be like trial balloons and thought bubbles a lot 93 00:05:34,760 --> 00:05:37,599 Speaker 1: of the time. So populating the world with all his 94 00:05:37,720 --> 00:05:40,840 Speaker 1: children guy, now there you go. So what kind of 95 00:05:41,040 --> 00:05:46,040 Speaker 1: right to these sorts of casual remarks carry in a corporom? Well, again, 96 00:05:46,480 --> 00:05:49,799 Speaker 1: you just don't know what is going to be the 97 00:05:49,880 --> 00:05:53,200 Speaker 1: key thing that rings with the judge. The key question 98 00:05:53,320 --> 00:05:58,680 Speaker 1: here is whether or not the Twitter folks were accurate 99 00:05:58,960 --> 00:06:04,320 Speaker 1: and robust and what they told Mr Musk and the 100 00:06:04,320 --> 00:06:07,719 Speaker 1: rest of the world about these bots, the spam and 101 00:06:07,839 --> 00:06:11,680 Speaker 1: robot accounts that are part of their their customer base. 102 00:06:12,440 --> 00:06:15,279 Speaker 1: If they were you know if they were accurate and 103 00:06:15,320 --> 00:06:19,320 Speaker 1: they were complete and telling people about that, they have 104 00:06:19,440 --> 00:06:22,159 Speaker 1: no trouble. Mr Musk is a big boys, the richest 105 00:06:22,160 --> 00:06:25,560 Speaker 1: man in the world, and he knows what a contract means. 106 00:06:25,560 --> 00:06:29,799 Speaker 1: But if in fact the Twitter folks haven't any way 107 00:06:29,960 --> 00:06:34,159 Speaker 1: been concealing the number of these accounts to pump up 108 00:06:34,200 --> 00:06:38,039 Speaker 1: the revenue numbers to be a problem, all right, Jeff, 109 00:06:38,040 --> 00:06:40,640 Speaker 1: thank you. Jeff Peely, Bloomberg Legal reporter,