WEBVTT - New CFTC Chairman Michael Selig on How to Regulate Prediction Markets

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

0:00:18.360 --> 0:00:21.440
<v Speaker 2>Hello and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots Podcast.

0:00:21.480 --> 0:00:23.720
<v Speaker 3>I'm Joe Wisenthal, and I'm Tracy Alloway.

0:00:23.960 --> 0:00:25.319
<v Speaker 2>Tracy, did you watch the Super Bowl?

0:00:26.200 --> 0:00:26.239
<v Speaker 3>No?

0:00:26.320 --> 0:00:28.000
<v Speaker 2>I was going to ask that, didn't I knew it.

0:00:28.080 --> 0:00:31.400
<v Speaker 3>Actually, I was going to start exactly the same way.

0:00:31.680 --> 0:00:34.240
<v Speaker 3>I did watch the Super Bowl, And so I feel

0:00:34.240 --> 0:00:38.040
<v Speaker 3>empowered to ask you a very controversial question. Oh yeah,

0:00:38.120 --> 0:00:42.360
<v Speaker 3>not which halftime show you watched, but did Cardi be

0:00:42.720 --> 0:00:44.720
<v Speaker 3>perform at the Super Bowl?

0:00:45.200 --> 0:00:46.920
<v Speaker 1>Oh?

0:00:47.040 --> 0:00:49.239
<v Speaker 2>Right, because this was a big thing. I forgot that

0:00:49.240 --> 0:00:51.840
<v Speaker 2>there was, you know what, I'm aware of various sort

0:00:51.880 --> 0:00:54.840
<v Speaker 2>of questions about prediction markets and things that people place

0:00:54.960 --> 0:00:57.080
<v Speaker 2>bets on. Well, how did that resolve? What was what

0:00:57.200 --> 0:00:58.160
<v Speaker 2>was the basic issue here?

0:00:58.160 --> 0:01:02.040
<v Speaker 3>Again? So I think it's still being resolved in various ways.

0:01:02.080 --> 0:01:05.120
<v Speaker 3>But Cardi b she was on set during Bad Bunnies

0:01:06.240 --> 0:01:10.759
<v Speaker 3>Extravaganza and she was kind of like dancing and singing along,

0:01:10.880 --> 0:01:13.600
<v Speaker 3>like mouthing words at least along with other people like

0:01:13.640 --> 0:01:15.800
<v Speaker 3>Pedro Pascal and Jessica Alba.

0:01:15.640 --> 0:01:20.120
<v Speaker 2>Yea Lady Gaga, well like singing right.

0:01:20.240 --> 0:01:23.200
<v Speaker 3>So the only reason this matters at all is because

0:01:23.240 --> 0:01:26.560
<v Speaker 3>of prediction Markets. So there was a bet will Cardi

0:01:26.640 --> 0:01:29.960
<v Speaker 3>be perform? And now the question is does standing on

0:01:30.080 --> 0:01:32.640
<v Speaker 3>stage and kind of bobbing your head and mouthing words

0:01:32.760 --> 0:01:37.600
<v Speaker 3>count as a performance? Polymarket says it does, cal She

0:01:38.160 --> 0:01:38.839
<v Speaker 3>says it doesn't.

0:01:38.920 --> 0:01:41.039
<v Speaker 2>Oh interesting, Yeah, there you go call She and poly

0:01:41.120 --> 0:01:44.440
<v Speaker 2>Markets split over whether Cardi b performed. That's a great tension.

0:01:44.600 --> 0:01:45.080
<v Speaker 3>I like that.

0:01:45.440 --> 0:01:47.520
<v Speaker 2>It was striking to me, setting aside that I actually

0:01:47.520 --> 0:01:50.200
<v Speaker 2>somehow seem to have missed the specific thing like how

0:01:50.280 --> 0:01:54.840
<v Speaker 2>much prediction markets are now just part of the consumption experience,

0:01:54.960 --> 0:01:57.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, even you look at all these different things

0:01:57.320 --> 0:02:01.040
<v Speaker 2>that people are talking about eighty Gaga going to show

0:02:01.080 --> 0:02:03.160
<v Speaker 2>up somehow, like someone made a bet on it before

0:02:03.360 --> 0:02:06.800
<v Speaker 2>it went public. But also just like with each score,

0:02:07.400 --> 0:02:09.399
<v Speaker 2>you know, you check the line, it's like how much

0:02:09.440 --> 0:02:13.200
<v Speaker 2>did this move the expectations of whether the Seahawks are leading?

0:02:13.280 --> 0:02:17.040
<v Speaker 2>Like prediction markets are truly becoming part of like pop

0:02:17.080 --> 0:02:18.960
<v Speaker 2>culture and how we interact with pop culture.

0:02:19.040 --> 0:02:22.360
<v Speaker 3>There were some weird bets around, like color of gatorade

0:02:22.360 --> 0:02:24.440
<v Speaker 3>that was going to get dumped on the coach. Yeah,

0:02:25.000 --> 0:02:29.440
<v Speaker 3>lengths of like the national anthem being sung? Yeah, did

0:02:29.440 --> 0:02:31.440
<v Speaker 3>you see that? Like I was tempted by some of those,

0:02:31.480 --> 0:02:32.760
<v Speaker 3>but I stayed away.

0:02:33.680 --> 0:02:37.800
<v Speaker 2>I've still I haven't used poly market or Kelsey probably was.

0:02:38.120 --> 0:02:38.320
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:02:38.400 --> 0:02:40.840
<v Speaker 2>The interesting thing too, is like how much the mood

0:02:40.880 --> 0:02:43.960
<v Speaker 2>has swung, right cause a few years ago, like I

0:02:43.960 --> 0:02:46.280
<v Speaker 2>don't know, twenty twenty two, twenty twenty three, I think

0:02:46.320 --> 0:02:49.640
<v Speaker 2>we did an episode like at that time, like there

0:02:49.680 --> 0:02:52.560
<v Speaker 2>was almost nothing and the sort of like regulatory one

0:02:52.600 --> 0:02:56.280
<v Speaker 2>to eighty. The degree to the liberalization of these markets

0:02:56.480 --> 0:02:59.160
<v Speaker 2>has been pretty remarkable, even you know, going back to

0:02:59.240 --> 0:03:01.600
<v Speaker 2>a year and a half go, there was just a

0:03:01.600 --> 0:03:04.680
<v Speaker 2>polymarket and it was just the offshore version that you

0:03:04.720 --> 0:03:08.160
<v Speaker 2>had to fund with stable coins, and now it's like exploded.

0:03:08.480 --> 0:03:12.079
<v Speaker 2>At the time, you know, Kelshi was very limited. They

0:03:12.080 --> 0:03:16.120
<v Speaker 2>didn't have US access, et cetera, or very curtailed US access. Anyway,

0:03:16.440 --> 0:03:18.639
<v Speaker 2>they're here and everyone's trying to wrap their heads on

0:03:18.919 --> 0:03:20.200
<v Speaker 2>where this is all going and stuff.

0:03:20.280 --> 0:03:22.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it feels like they're much more sanctioned, I guess

0:03:22.880 --> 0:03:23.520
<v Speaker 3>than they used to.

0:03:23.600 --> 0:03:23.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:03:23.840 --> 0:03:26.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but that said, there are still some issues that

0:03:26.800 --> 0:03:30.119
<v Speaker 3>people are trying to work out. You have ambiguous outcomes

0:03:30.280 --> 0:03:33.960
<v Speaker 3>like did Cardi B actually perform? You have concerns around

0:03:33.960 --> 0:03:37.480
<v Speaker 3>insider trading, No, not insider trading per se, because we're

0:03:37.520 --> 0:03:41.040
<v Speaker 3>not talking about securities contracts, but maybe people with insider

0:03:41.240 --> 0:03:45.280
<v Speaker 3>info who inadvertently disclosed something material. I was thinking about

0:03:45.320 --> 0:03:47.960
<v Speaker 3>this actually, So you can also bet on which companies

0:03:48.000 --> 0:03:50.800
<v Speaker 3>are going to run Super Bowl ads. Oh yeah, and

0:03:51.200 --> 0:03:54.480
<v Speaker 3>a lot of people must know if a company is

0:03:54.520 --> 0:03:56.200
<v Speaker 3>going to run an ad like that, you have like

0:03:56.240 --> 0:03:59.920
<v Speaker 3>the agency and actors like everyone, And you could argue

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:03.480
<v Speaker 3>maybe that that's material non public information. Right, you run

0:04:03.480 --> 0:04:05.320
<v Speaker 3>a Super Bowl ad, you get a bunch of attention.

0:04:05.720 --> 0:04:08.640
<v Speaker 3>Maybe your share price goes up if you're publicly listed. Yeah,

0:04:08.680 --> 0:04:09.080
<v Speaker 3>I don't know.

0:04:09.240 --> 0:04:11.640
<v Speaker 2>There are so many things anyway, rather than us just

0:04:11.720 --> 0:04:13.640
<v Speaker 2>keep talking about them because we can talk for an hour.

0:04:13.880 --> 0:04:16.800
<v Speaker 2>We really do have the perfect guest. We're going to

0:04:16.839 --> 0:04:19.239
<v Speaker 2>be speaking with Mike Selig. He is the new chairman

0:04:19.320 --> 0:04:23.000
<v Speaker 2>of the CFTC, the main regulator for prediction markets, who's

0:04:23.040 --> 0:04:26.400
<v Speaker 2>just sworn in in December. We're going to talk all

0:04:26.440 --> 0:04:29.120
<v Speaker 2>about this, maybe some crypto as well. So, Mike, thank

0:04:29.120 --> 0:04:31.200
<v Speaker 2>you so much for coming on out Locks, coming into

0:04:31.200 --> 0:04:32.000
<v Speaker 2>the studio.

0:04:31.839 --> 0:04:32.600
<v Speaker 4>Glad to be here.

0:04:33.000 --> 0:04:35.320
<v Speaker 2>Why do you tell us a little bit about just

0:04:35.640 --> 0:04:38.680
<v Speaker 2>broadly coming into this new role, like what are your

0:04:38.680 --> 0:04:40.760
<v Speaker 2>goals here with the CFTC.

0:04:40.800 --> 0:04:43.640
<v Speaker 5>Or really at a pivotal moment you mentioned prediction markets,

0:04:43.680 --> 0:04:48.039
<v Speaker 5>crypto AI, all manner of new technologies and products that

0:04:48.080 --> 0:04:51.840
<v Speaker 5>are impacting our markets. And the CFTC was really this

0:04:52.080 --> 0:04:55.160
<v Speaker 5>kind of little known regulator before the Financial crisis, regulating

0:04:55.200 --> 0:04:58.880
<v Speaker 5>the futures markets. It has expanded jurisdiction now or the

0:04:58.920 --> 0:05:02.599
<v Speaker 5>swaps markets, counter derivatives markets, and now we see so

0:05:02.680 --> 0:05:05.320
<v Speaker 5>much innovation in that space with things like prediction markets

0:05:05.360 --> 0:05:09.719
<v Speaker 5>and crypto, with legislation on the perverge of hopefully being

0:05:09.720 --> 0:05:12.599
<v Speaker 5>on the President's desk, and so the agency is really

0:05:12.640 --> 0:05:15.880
<v Speaker 5>at this unique moment where it has the opportunity to

0:05:16.000 --> 0:05:18.400
<v Speaker 5>shape the future of these new and emerging markets, and

0:05:18.600 --> 0:05:20.320
<v Speaker 5>it's really exciting time to be in the seat.

0:05:20.800 --> 0:05:23.279
<v Speaker 3>Do you have an opinion on whether Cardi B performed

0:05:23.320 --> 0:05:25.400
<v Speaker 3>at the Super Bowl? I mean, it's funny, but it's

0:05:25.440 --> 0:05:28.360
<v Speaker 3>also kind of irrelevant because I saw someone has actually

0:05:28.400 --> 0:05:32.840
<v Speaker 3>filed a complaint to the Commission about Calshi's decisions specifically.

0:05:33.040 --> 0:05:35.520
<v Speaker 5>Well, of course we're spending a lot of resources investigating

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:40.000
<v Speaker 5>whether Cardi B performed advocating. Really our focus here is

0:05:40.320 --> 0:05:43.240
<v Speaker 5>on the market, so the unique thing that the great

0:05:43.279 --> 0:05:45.599
<v Speaker 5>thing about the way that we regulate the markets is

0:05:45.600 --> 0:05:49.000
<v Speaker 5>that the exchanges themselves, similar to on the security side,

0:05:49.160 --> 0:05:52.760
<v Speaker 5>are self regulatory organizations. So each exchange has its own

0:05:52.800 --> 0:05:55.560
<v Speaker 5>rule book that's been approved by the agency. It has

0:05:55.600 --> 0:05:59.039
<v Speaker 5>its own requirements for contracts that are certified on the exchange.

0:05:59.240 --> 0:06:01.760
<v Speaker 5>So of course the card contracts went through a self

0:06:01.760 --> 0:06:05.839
<v Speaker 5>certification process and then they're settled in accordance with exchange rules.

0:06:05.839 --> 0:06:07.280
<v Speaker 4>They go through a clearinghouse as well.

0:06:07.680 --> 0:06:10.760
<v Speaker 5>So the exchanges each have these rule books and certain

0:06:10.800 --> 0:06:13.920
<v Speaker 5>requirements around how the contracts are resolved and settled. And

0:06:13.960 --> 0:06:17.080
<v Speaker 5>of course now we're seeing some differences amongst call She's

0:06:17.160 --> 0:06:19.120
<v Speaker 5>rulebook and poly Market's rule book.

0:06:19.160 --> 0:06:20.920
<v Speaker 4>But that's the great thing about our markets.

0:06:20.720 --> 0:06:22.960
<v Speaker 5>And having the ability to build a business, to develop

0:06:23.000 --> 0:06:26.440
<v Speaker 5>an exchange with some flexible guardrails on top that the

0:06:26.440 --> 0:06:29.680
<v Speaker 5>agency oversees. But we don't prescribe exactly what has to

0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:31.440
<v Speaker 5>be in the rule book. We have a principles based

0:06:31.480 --> 0:06:32.440
<v Speaker 5>system of regulation.

0:06:32.960 --> 0:06:36.440
<v Speaker 2>What is the basis for something like is CARDI B

0:06:36.680 --> 0:06:39.719
<v Speaker 2>going to perform at the Super Bowl? Have time show?

0:06:40.040 --> 0:06:44.120
<v Speaker 2>What is the basis for this being categorized as a

0:06:44.160 --> 0:06:48.160
<v Speaker 2>true financial instrument regulated by the CFDC, because it certainly

0:06:48.240 --> 0:06:49.279
<v Speaker 2>just feels like prop betting.

0:06:49.560 --> 0:06:52.719
<v Speaker 3>Who has economic exposure they need to hedge to cardi

0:06:52.760 --> 0:06:53.599
<v Speaker 3>b performing.

0:06:53.880 --> 0:06:58.160
<v Speaker 5>There's a really interesting historical story around the definition of

0:06:58.200 --> 0:07:02.200
<v Speaker 5>commodity and the markets that we regulate today, starting back

0:07:02.400 --> 0:07:06.480
<v Speaker 5>in the thirties when the Commodity Exchange Act was first ratified.

0:07:06.640 --> 0:07:09.720
<v Speaker 5>It was originally focused on grain, and over time we've

0:07:09.760 --> 0:07:10.320
<v Speaker 5>had things.

0:07:10.160 --> 0:07:13.040
<v Speaker 4>Like work values exactly. It's come a very long way.

0:07:13.040 --> 0:07:16.280
<v Speaker 5>Of course, with the financial crisis, we got all manner

0:07:16.440 --> 0:07:18.960
<v Speaker 5>of new products within our authority. But the definition of

0:07:18.960 --> 0:07:22.080
<v Speaker 5>commodity is extraordinarily brought. It includes virtually everything except a

0:07:22.080 --> 0:07:24.840
<v Speaker 5>few things have been carved out onions and motion picture

0:07:24.880 --> 0:07:27.800
<v Speaker 5>box office receiscent, and that's a really important point to

0:07:27.840 --> 0:07:31.080
<v Speaker 5>note that they were expressly carved out. So most things

0:07:31.200 --> 0:07:35.760
<v Speaker 5>in our commerce today, even securities, are technically considered commodities

0:07:35.800 --> 0:07:38.080
<v Speaker 5>under our act, and we have authority to regulate them.

0:07:38.240 --> 0:07:40.480
<v Speaker 5>In the case of securities, we coordinate with the sec

0:07:40.560 --> 0:07:43.080
<v Speaker 5>and have some joint authority. But for all other types

0:07:43.120 --> 0:07:45.480
<v Speaker 5>of products services rights.

0:07:45.600 --> 0:07:48.280
<v Speaker 4>In disease, people are going to hedge that risk.

0:07:48.320 --> 0:07:50.000
<v Speaker 5>They're going to be in the market to speculate on

0:07:50.040 --> 0:07:53.320
<v Speaker 5>those products, and so we don't merit regulate. We don't

0:07:53.360 --> 0:07:56.120
<v Speaker 5>tell people what they should be entering into contracts on.

0:07:56.480 --> 0:07:59.200
<v Speaker 5>We create rules and regulations around those markets to make

0:07:59.200 --> 0:08:02.200
<v Speaker 5>sure that they have integ that they're resilient, that they're vibrant,

0:08:02.280 --> 0:08:04.760
<v Speaker 5>and they have guardrails and in vexter protections. And so

0:08:04.800 --> 0:08:06.920
<v Speaker 5>that's why going back to the exchange rule books and

0:08:06.960 --> 0:08:10.920
<v Speaker 5>other control self certification being an important process. We're making

0:08:10.920 --> 0:08:13.160
<v Speaker 5>sure that those markets are safe and secure. But we're

0:08:13.160 --> 0:08:16.840
<v Speaker 5>not telling people whether to trade pork bellies or cardib

0:08:17.000 --> 0:08:18.360
<v Speaker 5>contracts or anything else.

0:08:19.360 --> 0:08:22.240
<v Speaker 3>So let's go to the insider trading question, because this

0:08:22.320 --> 0:08:24.280
<v Speaker 3>is sort of top of mind for a lot of people.

0:08:24.440 --> 0:08:27.840
<v Speaker 3>Technically it's not insider trading, but you know, it does

0:08:27.920 --> 0:08:30.600
<v Speaker 3>look like some people have inside knowledge sometimes when they

0:08:30.600 --> 0:08:34.040
<v Speaker 3>put on big bets on something that just happens to

0:08:34.160 --> 0:08:38.480
<v Speaker 3>happen the next day. The CFTC hasn't, as far as

0:08:38.520 --> 0:08:41.760
<v Speaker 3>I know, given a lot of guidance on this issue.

0:08:41.840 --> 0:08:43.360
<v Speaker 3>How are you actually thinking about it?

0:08:43.640 --> 0:08:46.319
<v Speaker 5>Well, from a legal standpoint, I think there's a bit

0:08:46.360 --> 0:08:49.760
<v Speaker 5>of a misunderstanding about the insider trading doctrine at the CFTC.

0:08:50.040 --> 0:08:52.480
<v Speaker 5>So the authority at the agency is very similar to

0:08:52.520 --> 0:08:56.360
<v Speaker 5>the authority at the SEC Under our Anti Fraudience Manipulation Rule,

0:08:56.600 --> 0:08:59.080
<v Speaker 5>we do have authority to police insider trading in the

0:08:59.080 --> 0:09:02.439
<v Speaker 5>commodities markets. Now, the way that insider trading is carried

0:09:02.520 --> 0:09:05.600
<v Speaker 5>out is oftentimes different from a situation where you have

0:09:05.640 --> 0:09:09.280
<v Speaker 5>informational asymmetries relevant to a company. But there are situations

0:09:09.280 --> 0:09:12.560
<v Speaker 5>where you have informational asymmetries related to the markets, placing

0:09:12.559 --> 0:09:15.480
<v Speaker 5>a trade ahead of a customer, for example, or even

0:09:15.520 --> 0:09:18.320
<v Speaker 5>in this situation now with prediction markets, and that's something

0:09:18.360 --> 0:09:22.160
<v Speaker 5>we are thinking about and certainly on the beat and exploring.

0:09:22.440 --> 0:09:25.440
<v Speaker 5>So we surveil the markets, we collect data, we have

0:09:25.480 --> 0:09:29.080
<v Speaker 5>information about. For example, you know, our players participating in

0:09:29.120 --> 0:09:32.800
<v Speaker 5>these markets are people associated with the sports leagues, etc.

0:09:33.360 --> 0:09:34.840
<v Speaker 5>And so we are a cop on the beat in

0:09:34.840 --> 0:09:38.000
<v Speaker 5>that regard. So the doctrine is not entirely different, but

0:09:38.000 --> 0:09:40.440
<v Speaker 5>there are some nuances that we're aware of and making

0:09:40.440 --> 0:09:41.280
<v Speaker 5>sure that we're policing.

0:09:41.280 --> 0:10:00.280
<v Speaker 2>For would poly Market or Kelsey in your view, be

0:10:00.400 --> 0:10:04.200
<v Speaker 2>allowed to live stream a video of a giant roulette

0:10:04.200 --> 0:10:07.680
<v Speaker 2>wheel and let people trade futures on when it lands

0:10:07.679 --> 0:10:08.360
<v Speaker 2>on red or black?

0:10:09.880 --> 0:10:12.640
<v Speaker 5>Some of these types of gaming where it's really a

0:10:12.640 --> 0:10:15.800
<v Speaker 5>game of chance and not a game of skill, there's

0:10:16.120 --> 0:10:18.560
<v Speaker 5>definitely a difference. And I think when we look at

0:10:18.600 --> 0:10:21.800
<v Speaker 5>what's a commodity, it's possible that you could construct some

0:10:21.840 --> 0:10:26.280
<v Speaker 5>sort of contract an esotera derivative, but really the underlying

0:10:26.320 --> 0:10:28.439
<v Speaker 5>and a game of skills very different. There's a clear

0:10:28.520 --> 0:10:31.760
<v Speaker 5>economic risk associated for example, at the super Bowl.

0:10:31.920 --> 0:10:32.880
<v Speaker 4>It's a good example.

0:10:33.240 --> 0:10:35.840
<v Speaker 5>There's a ton of economic activity associated with that. There's

0:10:35.880 --> 0:10:39.800
<v Speaker 5>hotel revenue that comes from it, there's vendors, there's activity

0:10:39.800 --> 0:10:42.800
<v Speaker 5>within the city, tourism, all of that, and so there's

0:10:42.840 --> 0:10:45.160
<v Speaker 5>a real reason to hedge that risk. With a game

0:10:45.200 --> 0:10:48.080
<v Speaker 5>of chance, it's harder to say it's possible you can

0:10:48.160 --> 0:10:51.360
<v Speaker 5>construct something, but it's less likely that that's a real underlying.

0:10:51.440 --> 0:10:53.600
<v Speaker 2>Well, like what is like the difference because you know,

0:10:53.840 --> 0:10:56.760
<v Speaker 2>let's say it's what is bad Bunny's first song going

0:10:56.800 --> 0:10:59.439
<v Speaker 2>to be at the super Bowl? Like, what is the

0:10:59.480 --> 0:11:02.880
<v Speaker 2>difference between that, which doesn't really seem any more economic

0:11:03.120 --> 0:11:05.640
<v Speaker 2>than reultwel and whatever it is?

0:11:05.840 --> 0:11:08.800
<v Speaker 5>Well, to be clear, there's no requirement in the act

0:11:08.840 --> 0:11:13.280
<v Speaker 5>that there has to necessarily be some merit based result

0:11:13.600 --> 0:11:15.720
<v Speaker 5>from a contract. I do think with a lot of

0:11:15.760 --> 0:11:19.520
<v Speaker 5>these information markets, these prediction markets, where they're forecasting a

0:11:19.559 --> 0:11:22.640
<v Speaker 5>potential outcome in the future, they produce a lot of

0:11:22.760 --> 0:11:26.560
<v Speaker 5>useful information. We are seeing newsrooms incorporate prediction markets, We're

0:11:26.559 --> 0:11:30.480
<v Speaker 5>seeing sports live broadcasts incorporate prediction markets. We're seeing the

0:11:30.520 --> 0:11:33.840
<v Speaker 5>information use in particular. A great example is the election

0:11:33.920 --> 0:11:36.520
<v Speaker 5>in twenty twenty four were the president had a very

0:11:36.600 --> 0:11:39.720
<v Speaker 5>large victory and that was not necessarily forecast in many

0:11:39.720 --> 0:11:41.840
<v Speaker 5>of the polls, but of course the prediction markets got

0:11:41.920 --> 0:11:44.360
<v Speaker 5>that right. So it's something that I think is valuable

0:11:44.400 --> 0:11:47.960
<v Speaker 5>to society. The question of having regulation around that's a

0:11:47.960 --> 0:11:48.600
<v Speaker 5>separate question.

0:11:48.640 --> 0:11:49.760
<v Speaker 4>I think that's an important one.

0:11:49.800 --> 0:11:52.319
<v Speaker 5>We are certainly taking on that task and making sure

0:11:52.640 --> 0:11:54.920
<v Speaker 5>that we don't let these markets languish or that we

0:11:54.960 --> 0:11:57.839
<v Speaker 5>don't push them offshore, but we develop the right rules

0:11:57.840 --> 0:12:01.120
<v Speaker 5>and regulations to develop investments and make sure that the

0:12:01.160 --> 0:12:03.440
<v Speaker 5>markets are flourishing here in the United States.

0:12:04.000 --> 0:12:06.880
<v Speaker 3>Since we're discussing prediction markets through the medium of the

0:12:06.920 --> 0:12:10.320
<v Speaker 3>Super Bowl, and you mentioned players as well, looking at

0:12:10.480 --> 0:12:14.640
<v Speaker 3>player behavior, if a player were to place a bet

0:12:14.960 --> 0:12:18.040
<v Speaker 3>on I don't know, a specific play during the game,

0:12:18.200 --> 0:12:20.719
<v Speaker 3>and then they did it themselves like something that they

0:12:20.760 --> 0:12:24.439
<v Speaker 3>actually have agency over. Would that be something that you

0:12:24.520 --> 0:12:26.800
<v Speaker 3>would investigate or look into.

0:12:26.679 --> 0:12:28.560
<v Speaker 5>You know, I think it's all facts and circumstances, So

0:12:28.600 --> 0:12:32.559
<v Speaker 5>we ne'd evaluate potentially to the extent that there's insiders

0:12:32.559 --> 0:12:35.160
<v Speaker 5>that are involved in the markets, we get that data.

0:12:35.160 --> 0:12:37.280
<v Speaker 5>We're actually talking to a lot of the sports leagues.

0:12:37.280 --> 0:12:39.640
<v Speaker 5>We're talking to participants in the markets to make sure

0:12:39.679 --> 0:12:42.040
<v Speaker 5>that we are on top of things, have information about

0:12:42.080 --> 0:12:44.480
<v Speaker 5>who is able to be participating in these markets who's not.

0:12:45.040 --> 0:12:47.240
<v Speaker 4>We do have at the exchange level.

0:12:47.400 --> 0:12:49.760
<v Speaker 5>The exchanges are really the first line of defense, and

0:12:49.840 --> 0:12:53.640
<v Speaker 5>they're surveilling the markets, they're doing KYC on their customers,

0:12:53.880 --> 0:12:55.800
<v Speaker 5>and so that's certainly something we're on top of and

0:12:55.840 --> 0:12:58.559
<v Speaker 5>we'd consider and evaluate on a case by case basis.

0:12:59.200 --> 0:13:03.320
<v Speaker 2>Why isn't a trading sports derivatives gambling or betting or

0:13:03.400 --> 0:13:03.920
<v Speaker 2>is it betting?

0:13:04.000 --> 0:13:06.520
<v Speaker 4>Well, there really is an interesting history here.

0:13:06.520 --> 0:13:11.439
<v Speaker 5>So if you go back to the thirties, national grain

0:13:11.520 --> 0:13:13.599
<v Speaker 5>betting was a thing, right, and that was considered a

0:13:13.679 --> 0:13:17.160
<v Speaker 5>national pastime. And so for as long as we've had

0:13:17.200 --> 0:13:19.880
<v Speaker 5>derivatives markets, we've had these so called bucket shops which

0:13:19.880 --> 0:13:23.280
<v Speaker 5>were you know, these these off exchange markets where people

0:13:23.320 --> 0:13:26.040
<v Speaker 5>were just placing bets against the house on the future

0:13:26.120 --> 0:13:27.120
<v Speaker 5>price of a commodity.

0:13:27.480 --> 0:13:29.679
<v Speaker 4>On the other hand, you had organized exchanges.

0:13:29.679 --> 0:13:32.720
<v Speaker 5>So the Chicago Board of Trade later CME and others

0:13:33.000 --> 0:13:36.360
<v Speaker 5>had organized markets with market integrity. They had derivative instruments

0:13:36.440 --> 0:13:40.520
<v Speaker 5>contracts where you actually were in a contract with another person.

0:13:40.640 --> 0:13:42.959
<v Speaker 5>And then now in our markets, we have a clearinghouse

0:13:43.080 --> 0:13:45.560
<v Speaker 5>novating and standing in the middle of those contracts. But

0:13:45.640 --> 0:13:47.719
<v Speaker 5>you have a buyer for every seller. With the kind

0:13:47.720 --> 0:13:50.320
<v Speaker 5>of booky model, that's not the case. You're betting against

0:13:50.320 --> 0:13:53.040
<v Speaker 5>the house, and there's a lot of different rules. When

0:13:53.040 --> 0:13:54.880
<v Speaker 5>you're betting against the house. You don't have the liquidity

0:13:54.920 --> 0:13:57.320
<v Speaker 5>of being able to offset your position or sell out

0:13:57.360 --> 0:14:00.240
<v Speaker 5>of your position. You're kind of stuck taking for the

0:14:00.280 --> 0:14:02.520
<v Speaker 5>bookie's giving you, and some of the odds are very different,

0:14:02.559 --> 0:14:04.840
<v Speaker 5>so you're actually facing the odds of the bookie as

0:14:04.880 --> 0:14:07.320
<v Speaker 5>opposed to hear where the contracts go up and down

0:14:07.320 --> 0:14:11.240
<v Speaker 5>a value based on actual market activity. And so over time,

0:14:11.440 --> 0:14:14.440
<v Speaker 5>the Supreme Court actually blocked some of this bucket shop

0:14:14.480 --> 0:14:17.200
<v Speaker 5>activity by saying you can't take the price quotations from

0:14:17.360 --> 0:14:19.600
<v Speaker 5>the organized exchanges and use them in a bucket shop,

0:14:20.240 --> 0:14:21.880
<v Speaker 5>but a lot of these bucket shops over the years

0:14:21.840 --> 0:14:24.640
<v Speaker 5>have now moved into gaming and other things. We're seeing

0:14:24.680 --> 0:14:28.200
<v Speaker 5>really the same phenomenon where we have casinos and other

0:14:28.240 --> 0:14:33.040
<v Speaker 5>operations that are operating lawfully under state requirements and regulations,

0:14:33.200 --> 0:14:35.080
<v Speaker 5>but they don't have the same sorts of controls. You know,

0:14:35.080 --> 0:14:38.720
<v Speaker 5>we regulate a nearly five hundred trillion notional market with

0:14:38.760 --> 0:14:41.960
<v Speaker 5>the swaps market. We have very stringent requirements and controls

0:14:42.000 --> 0:14:45.560
<v Speaker 5>around our exchanges, and these contracts reflect that. They go

0:14:45.640 --> 0:14:49.360
<v Speaker 5>through a very stringent process of self certification. They can't

0:14:49.360 --> 0:14:52.640
<v Speaker 5>be readily susceptible to manipulation. We survey those markets, we've

0:14:52.640 --> 0:14:55.120
<v Speaker 5>policed things like insider trading, and so it's a much

0:14:55.120 --> 0:14:57.880
<v Speaker 5>more robust scheme on top of these markets, much higher

0:14:57.880 --> 0:15:00.720
<v Speaker 5>stringent requirements, and so I I do think we're seeing

0:15:00.720 --> 0:15:04.040
<v Speaker 5>a lot of parallels between the thirties and forties and today.

0:15:04.400 --> 0:15:06.400
<v Speaker 5>But rest assure that we're on top of these markets

0:15:06.520 --> 0:15:09.120
<v Speaker 5>and these have the same sorts of investor protections that

0:15:09.120 --> 0:15:11.680
<v Speaker 5>you would expect in the securities markets and in our

0:15:11.680 --> 0:15:12.600
<v Speaker 5>futures markets.

0:15:13.280 --> 0:15:16.280
<v Speaker 3>Out of curiosity, how much of your time is split

0:15:16.400 --> 0:15:20.440
<v Speaker 3>now between the new stuff, prediction markets crypto versus the

0:15:20.840 --> 0:15:23.160
<v Speaker 3>I guess, the old boring futures exchanges.

0:15:23.360 --> 0:15:26.080
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, oh five, Well, our day to day is really

0:15:26.120 --> 0:15:28.840
<v Speaker 5>the traditional markets. So and when we talk about these

0:15:28.880 --> 0:15:31.560
<v Speaker 5>new markets, many of the incumbents are getting into this

0:15:31.600 --> 0:15:33.760
<v Speaker 5>space as well. We're seeing more and more of these

0:15:33.760 --> 0:15:37.080
<v Speaker 5>products offered on our traditional dcms, But all of these

0:15:37.080 --> 0:15:40.440
<v Speaker 5>are the same registration category, right. There are some nuances

0:15:40.440 --> 0:15:42.520
<v Speaker 5>and how they're set up. There's some new action relief

0:15:42.560 --> 0:15:45.680
<v Speaker 5>that's been given to some of these platforms historically, but

0:15:45.840 --> 0:15:48.240
<v Speaker 5>this is not it's not, you know, our day to

0:15:48.320 --> 0:15:52.600
<v Speaker 5>day bulk of work. That said, given that it's new,

0:15:52.640 --> 0:15:55.120
<v Speaker 5>and given that there's so much that is changing, we

0:15:55.240 --> 0:15:58.240
<v Speaker 5>have a lot more rulemaking and policy work to do

0:15:58.280 --> 0:16:00.680
<v Speaker 5>in this space. So I do think it's a big

0:16:00.760 --> 0:16:03.920
<v Speaker 5>piece because of that. But in terms of the actual

0:16:04.360 --> 0:16:07.080
<v Speaker 5>size of these markets compared to our as I said,

0:16:07.160 --> 0:16:11.400
<v Speaker 5>about five hundred trillion dollar notional swaps market forty trillion

0:16:11.480 --> 0:16:15.960
<v Speaker 5>dollar notional futures markets, it's a smaller piece, but it's growing,

0:16:16.080 --> 0:16:18.280
<v Speaker 5>and I think blockchain is going to really change, in

0:16:18.320 --> 0:16:22.400
<v Speaker 5>particular how some of these existing exchanges operate, how they

0:16:22.440 --> 0:16:25.360
<v Speaker 5>settle transactions and so forth, and so it's a really

0:16:25.360 --> 0:16:26.800
<v Speaker 5>exciting time to be in the seat.

0:16:27.080 --> 0:16:30.400
<v Speaker 2>So I get that there are some market structure differences

0:16:30.520 --> 0:16:35.320
<v Speaker 2>between a futures exchange on sports versus the traditional house

0:16:35.360 --> 0:16:38.560
<v Speaker 2>sets the odds and so forth, But from the perspective

0:16:38.840 --> 0:16:42.360
<v Speaker 2>of the user or the person who's putting money on

0:16:42.400 --> 0:16:45.720
<v Speaker 2>the line, like I think most people would say, like economically,

0:16:46.280 --> 0:16:48.560
<v Speaker 2>they're very similar, and they're getting more similar because we

0:16:48.640 --> 0:16:50.880
<v Speaker 2>know that to say, like the Kelshie and poly market

0:16:51.080 --> 0:16:53.800
<v Speaker 2>they're trying to get into to do parlays and stuff,

0:16:53.840 --> 0:16:57.480
<v Speaker 2>so like it's getting closer and closer. And you know,

0:16:57.520 --> 0:17:00.160
<v Speaker 2>people have a lot of concerns about sports gambling, the

0:17:00.160 --> 0:17:03.000
<v Speaker 2>effect that that has on young people and so forth.

0:17:03.280 --> 0:17:06.679
<v Speaker 2>National legalization of these it defecta lowers the age in

0:17:06.720 --> 0:17:08.920
<v Speaker 2>a lot of states because in a lot of states

0:17:08.960 --> 0:17:11.760
<v Speaker 2>the legal age to gamble is twenty one and the

0:17:11.840 --> 0:17:14.040
<v Speaker 2>legal age to trade a future is like eighteen. I

0:17:14.080 --> 0:17:17.399
<v Speaker 2>believe do you think that's good that we've defacto lowered

0:17:17.400 --> 0:17:18.560
<v Speaker 2>the age to bet on sports.

0:17:19.200 --> 0:17:21.240
<v Speaker 4>Well, again, we're not merit regulators.

0:17:21.480 --> 0:17:23.440
<v Speaker 5>We don't pass judgment on kind of the age requirements

0:17:23.440 --> 0:17:25.879
<v Speaker 5>in our securities markets and our derivatives' markets. We have

0:17:25.920 --> 0:17:30.160
<v Speaker 5>certain standards that have been upheld these markets. People are

0:17:30.200 --> 0:17:33.080
<v Speaker 5>betting on any number of assets, right if.

0:17:33.040 --> 0:17:35.040
<v Speaker 2>You want to call it these overwhelmingly sports.

0:17:35.960 --> 0:17:38.359
<v Speaker 5>I mean I think that said you have the ability

0:17:38.400 --> 0:17:41.640
<v Speaker 5>to make investments and trade options all manner of securities,

0:17:41.680 --> 0:17:44.040
<v Speaker 5>all manner of commodities, and so the rules are not

0:17:44.160 --> 0:17:47.440
<v Speaker 5>different based on being sports or this or that. I

0:17:47.480 --> 0:17:49.879
<v Speaker 5>think this term betting has been used and thrown about

0:17:50.200 --> 0:17:52.800
<v Speaker 5>in our securities markets and our derivatives markets as well,

0:17:53.000 --> 0:17:56.040
<v Speaker 5>and I don't think it necessarily means anything in particular,

0:17:56.160 --> 0:17:59.040
<v Speaker 5>but the notion is that you're able to make decisions

0:17:59.080 --> 0:18:02.600
<v Speaker 5>at eighteen in our markets, and we uphold that. State

0:18:02.600 --> 0:18:05.520
<v Speaker 5>by state, some of the standards have set even higher,

0:18:05.640 --> 0:18:08.239
<v Speaker 5>and that is not something that you know, I have

0:18:08.280 --> 0:18:09.359
<v Speaker 5>a particular opinion on.

0:18:09.440 --> 0:18:10.600
<v Speaker 4>I think that's just the way.

0:18:10.440 --> 0:18:12.040
<v Speaker 2>When you say, sure, what do you mean in state

0:18:12.080 --> 0:18:13.560
<v Speaker 2>by say some of the standards.

0:18:13.160 --> 0:18:15.440
<v Speaker 5>So some of the states have flexibility and what they

0:18:15.520 --> 0:18:18.760
<v Speaker 5>set up for drinking or for you know, gambling, and

0:18:18.800 --> 0:18:21.200
<v Speaker 5>then like this is financial market activity.

0:18:21.240 --> 0:18:24.800
<v Speaker 4>These are not wagers. You're not betting against the house.

0:18:24.840 --> 0:18:28.840
<v Speaker 5>We have significant overlay from a regulatory standpoint over these markets,

0:18:28.840 --> 0:18:33.200
<v Speaker 5>and so we're not gatekeeping particular categories of markets, elections

0:18:33.280 --> 0:18:35.840
<v Speaker 5>or sports and having different standards. That's not how we've

0:18:35.840 --> 0:18:38.199
<v Speaker 5>typically done things, and so we don't intend to do

0:18:38.240 --> 0:18:39.679
<v Speaker 5>that in this particular market.

0:18:40.119 --> 0:18:43.080
<v Speaker 3>So you're not a merit based regulator, but you are

0:18:43.119 --> 0:18:46.440
<v Speaker 3>a technical regulator. And as we've been discussing, there's a

0:18:46.480 --> 0:18:49.280
<v Speaker 3>lot going on, lots of rulemaking to do, lots of

0:18:49.280 --> 0:18:54.280
<v Speaker 3>potential enforcement actions. There's a barren story out today talking

0:18:54.280 --> 0:18:59.080
<v Speaker 3>about how the CFTC apparently has no enforcement officers left

0:18:59.119 --> 0:19:02.479
<v Speaker 3>in its Chicago office, and you used to have twenty,

0:19:02.600 --> 0:19:07.640
<v Speaker 3>but everyone resigned. It seems. How are you balancing all

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:11.040
<v Speaker 3>these new markets which are growing really really fast and

0:19:11.160 --> 0:19:15.359
<v Speaker 3>pose some very thorny questions that we've been discussing with

0:19:15.840 --> 0:19:17.119
<v Speaker 3>more limited resources.

0:19:17.480 --> 0:19:20.000
<v Speaker 5>Well, look, a lot of the folks that left that

0:19:20.119 --> 0:19:23.720
<v Speaker 5>was before my tenure, and certainly you know it's not

0:19:24.359 --> 0:19:26.160
<v Speaker 5>you know, they didn't leave it right after I joined, right,

0:19:26.960 --> 0:19:29.000
<v Speaker 5>But no, I think that it's a serious question. Right,

0:19:29.040 --> 0:19:30.880
<v Speaker 5>We've got to make sure that we have adequate staff

0:19:31.000 --> 0:19:33.520
<v Speaker 5>to police the markets, and we do have a ton

0:19:33.520 --> 0:19:36.280
<v Speaker 5>of staff throughout the country, and you know, to the

0:19:36.280 --> 0:19:38.679
<v Speaker 5>point of our Chicago office, of course, it's important that

0:19:38.720 --> 0:19:41.159
<v Speaker 5>we have folks within that office, but we don't have

0:19:41.160 --> 0:19:43.359
<v Speaker 5>a Texas office, we don't have a Florida office, we

0:19:43.359 --> 0:19:44.640
<v Speaker 5>don't have offices in every state.

0:19:44.640 --> 0:19:46.040
<v Speaker 4>We have a handful of offices.

0:19:46.160 --> 0:19:48.880
<v Speaker 5>We've got a critical mass in DC and a number

0:19:48.880 --> 0:19:51.000
<v Speaker 5>of folks in New York as well, and those are

0:19:51.160 --> 0:19:54.800
<v Speaker 5>two largest offices. We continue to fill those out, and

0:19:55.280 --> 0:19:58.000
<v Speaker 5>we would love to have more people in Chicago, and

0:19:58.440 --> 0:20:00.080
<v Speaker 5>you know, the door is always open for folks that

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:01.560
<v Speaker 5>want to come in and work for us, and we

0:20:01.600 --> 0:20:03.360
<v Speaker 5>continue to build out the ranks there.

0:20:03.400 --> 0:20:04.919
<v Speaker 4>But we have adequate resources.

0:20:04.960 --> 0:20:07.320
<v Speaker 5>We have a ton of folks within each of our offices,

0:20:07.359 --> 0:20:10.359
<v Speaker 5>and we're actually leveraging a lot of the new technologies

0:20:10.359 --> 0:20:12.600
<v Speaker 5>like AI to make sure that we're surveilling the markets

0:20:12.880 --> 0:20:16.040
<v Speaker 5>and that we're reviewing things like can started trading and

0:20:16.080 --> 0:20:19.439
<v Speaker 5>bringing cases where it makes sense. We're also processing applications

0:20:19.480 --> 0:20:21.720
<v Speaker 5>very quickly. We just processed, I think in a record

0:20:21.760 --> 0:20:24.399
<v Speaker 5>time of two hundred days one of the more recent

0:20:24.520 --> 0:20:25.640
<v Speaker 5>exchange applications.

0:20:25.640 --> 0:20:27.320
<v Speaker 4>So we're really well staffed.

0:20:27.320 --> 0:20:29.080
<v Speaker 5>But we're continuing to build that out and make sure

0:20:29.119 --> 0:20:31.080
<v Speaker 5>that we have good people in the building who are

0:20:31.320 --> 0:20:32.040
<v Speaker 5>competent and.

0:20:32.040 --> 0:20:34.720
<v Speaker 4>Able to make sure that we protect our markets.

0:20:34.960 --> 0:20:38.600
<v Speaker 2>So you have the funding to add headcount, and are

0:20:38.600 --> 0:20:41.480
<v Speaker 2>you pursuing like building out the headcount. Do you need

0:20:41.480 --> 0:20:42.000
<v Speaker 2>more funding?

0:20:42.200 --> 0:20:45.399
<v Speaker 5>Absolutely, so we are actually staffing up, so one hundred

0:20:45.400 --> 0:20:48.919
<v Speaker 5>percent we're building that out. We have adequate resources to

0:20:48.960 --> 0:20:50.719
<v Speaker 5>do so. But I want to be clear that we

0:20:50.800 --> 0:20:54.000
<v Speaker 5>have a very well staffed building and we're very much

0:20:54.040 --> 0:20:56.359
<v Speaker 5>on top of things with and you know, these questions

0:20:56.400 --> 0:20:59.160
<v Speaker 5>are out not enforcing and surveilling. You know, I think

0:20:59.160 --> 0:21:00.800
<v Speaker 5>there's a little bit of face news there. We probably

0:21:00.800 --> 0:21:02.879
<v Speaker 5>should put it up to a prediction market. But I

0:21:02.920 --> 0:21:04.280
<v Speaker 5>do think that we're on top of things.

0:21:05.160 --> 0:21:08.080
<v Speaker 3>So one thing I know about the Trump administration, they

0:21:08.080 --> 0:21:13.200
<v Speaker 3>are big fans, seemingly of cutting costs, cutting spending, streamlining

0:21:13.280 --> 0:21:16.560
<v Speaker 3>the federal government in some ways, and you know, sometimes

0:21:16.600 --> 0:21:20.080
<v Speaker 3>cutting agencies altogether. This has been a really long running

0:21:20.160 --> 0:21:25.000
<v Speaker 3>question in market structure world. But why don't we just

0:21:25.040 --> 0:21:27.040
<v Speaker 3>combine the CFTC SEC.

0:21:27.600 --> 0:21:29.200
<v Speaker 4>It's everybody's favorite question. Yeah.

0:21:29.240 --> 0:21:32.240
<v Speaker 5>Look, the CFTC and SEC are very different regulators. So

0:21:32.280 --> 0:21:35.760
<v Speaker 5>the SEC is a capital markets regulator. They're focused on

0:21:36.040 --> 0:21:39.119
<v Speaker 5>somebody wants to go race capital for a great idea.

0:21:39.240 --> 0:21:41.680
<v Speaker 5>Other people want to place that capital somewhere there needs

0:21:41.720 --> 0:21:44.280
<v Speaker 5>to be some regulation over that. After the Great Depression,

0:21:44.320 --> 0:21:46.520
<v Speaker 5>there was a lot of chaos in the markets, and

0:21:46.720 --> 0:21:50.639
<v Speaker 5>the agency really was a great answer to that issue

0:21:50.800 --> 0:21:53.640
<v Speaker 5>and has put a great regime in place to regulate

0:21:53.680 --> 0:21:56.480
<v Speaker 5>all of that. The CFTC grew up actually at a

0:21:56.560 --> 0:21:59.280
<v Speaker 5>different time. The original act was in the thirties, but

0:21:59.400 --> 0:22:01.880
<v Speaker 5>later on and the safetc Was established in the seventies.

0:22:02.040 --> 0:22:06.000
<v Speaker 5>But the purpose of the CFDC is to regulate risk mitigation,

0:22:06.200 --> 0:22:09.720
<v Speaker 5>risk management very different areas. So there are firms that

0:22:10.040 --> 0:22:14.000
<v Speaker 5>whether farmers, ranchers, energy producers. Now we have data centers

0:22:14.440 --> 0:22:17.320
<v Speaker 5>in the AI space, but all manner of businesses have

0:22:17.400 --> 0:22:19.439
<v Speaker 5>a bunch of risk related to the inputs for their

0:22:19.480 --> 0:22:23.359
<v Speaker 5>business and ongoing operations and they need to hedge that risk.

0:22:23.440 --> 0:22:26.320
<v Speaker 5>And there are other praditions that want to supply liquidity

0:22:26.359 --> 0:22:30.160
<v Speaker 5>into those markets, make markets, or speculate, and the CFTC

0:22:30.440 --> 0:22:33.400
<v Speaker 5>regulates that. So very different purpose for the regulator. There's

0:22:33.400 --> 0:22:35.720
<v Speaker 5>not the same sort of disclosure regime that we have

0:22:35.800 --> 0:22:37.879
<v Speaker 5>with the SEC, and so it makes sense to have

0:22:37.960 --> 0:22:40.840
<v Speaker 5>two separate regulators. But what doesn't make sense and what

0:22:40.920 --> 0:22:43.320
<v Speaker 5>Chairman Akins and I have been very clear on is

0:22:43.359 --> 0:22:46.520
<v Speaker 5>the lack of coordination between the agency. So it's coordination,

0:22:46.920 --> 0:22:51.560
<v Speaker 5>not consolidation. We need to harmonize the two regimes to

0:22:51.680 --> 0:22:55.800
<v Speaker 5>make sure that there's not inconsistent and incompatible rules and

0:22:55.840 --> 0:22:58.520
<v Speaker 5>that there's not gaps. So Chairman Akins is referred to

0:22:58.560 --> 0:23:02.120
<v Speaker 5>this no man's land between the two agencies where you've

0:23:02.119 --> 0:23:05.280
<v Speaker 5>got the bodies of all these dead products and services

0:23:05.320 --> 0:23:07.720
<v Speaker 5>that otherwise could have been if the agencies could just

0:23:07.720 --> 0:23:11.000
<v Speaker 5>figure out how to coordinate. Security futures is a great example.

0:23:11.280 --> 0:23:14.280
<v Speaker 5>We have shared jurisdiction there, but we've really failed to

0:23:14.359 --> 0:23:15.120
<v Speaker 5>work well.

0:23:14.920 --> 0:23:16.480
<v Speaker 4>Together to get that off the ground.

0:23:16.880 --> 0:23:18.439
<v Speaker 5>And so I think it's really a new day at

0:23:18.480 --> 0:23:21.479
<v Speaker 5>both agencies where we're intending to work closely together on that.

0:23:21.880 --> 0:23:23.959
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, this is exactly what I wanted to ask. So

0:23:24.560 --> 0:23:28.280
<v Speaker 3>I've heard people talk about increased cooperation and coordination between

0:23:28.280 --> 0:23:32.600
<v Speaker 3>the SEC and the CFTC basically ever since the financial crisis,

0:23:33.040 --> 0:23:36.359
<v Speaker 3>and it hasn't really happened, or it hasn't happened to

0:23:36.400 --> 0:23:39.399
<v Speaker 3>the degree that some people would like to see, what's

0:23:39.440 --> 0:23:43.560
<v Speaker 3>your diagnosis of the actual problem there? And I would

0:23:43.600 --> 0:23:46.239
<v Speaker 3>love to get into the weeds here, and you know, like,

0:23:46.400 --> 0:23:49.600
<v Speaker 3>what does coordination look like between the two agencies.

0:23:50.200 --> 0:23:52.240
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean, I'm in a good position that I

0:23:52.320 --> 0:23:55.000
<v Speaker 5>used to work for Tairman Akins, But you know, so

0:23:55.040 --> 0:23:56.840
<v Speaker 5>I think we have a great relationship just getting off

0:23:56.840 --> 0:24:00.359
<v Speaker 5>for the start. But a memorandum of understanding is something

0:24:00.400 --> 0:24:03.160
<v Speaker 5>that we've committed to execute and we're looking to ext

0:24:03.240 --> 0:24:05.520
<v Speaker 5>you very soon, and that really set all the ground

0:24:05.640 --> 0:24:08.800
<v Speaker 5>rules for coordination between the staffs, and so not having

0:24:08.840 --> 0:24:12.000
<v Speaker 5>that in place, I think is really hampered the two agencies.

0:24:12.080 --> 0:24:15.200
<v Speaker 5>Because sharing information is really important. You need a framework

0:24:15.200 --> 0:24:17.840
<v Speaker 5>for sharing that information. There's a lot of non public

0:24:18.200 --> 0:24:21.440
<v Speaker 5>material that has generated in each building and so having

0:24:21.520 --> 0:24:24.359
<v Speaker 5>rules for the sharing of that information is important. Having

0:24:24.400 --> 0:24:27.719
<v Speaker 5>regular meetings between the staffs and coordination and sharing of

0:24:28.080 --> 0:24:31.600
<v Speaker 5>market data related to registrants is really important. So if

0:24:31.600 --> 0:24:34.840
<v Speaker 5>we've got dual registrants and we're collecting our own sets

0:24:34.880 --> 0:24:37.879
<v Speaker 5>of information and we're ensuring that they're each complying with

0:24:38.160 --> 0:24:41.399
<v Speaker 5>these two kind of separate fortresses of rules and regulations,

0:24:41.920 --> 0:24:44.200
<v Speaker 5>how do we know who's doing what and what needs

0:24:44.200 --> 0:24:46.800
<v Speaker 5>to be changed, And so having the information is really important.

0:24:46.800 --> 0:24:49.040
<v Speaker 5>That's the first step, and then the staffs need to

0:24:49.080 --> 0:24:52.480
<v Speaker 5>come together and figure out how to create substitute compliance.

0:24:52.800 --> 0:24:56.239
<v Speaker 5>So certain rules are incompatible on both sides, we need

0:24:56.280 --> 0:24:58.200
<v Speaker 5>to knock those out, or at least have a kind

0:24:58.200 --> 0:25:01.640
<v Speaker 5>of default choice one agency versus the other. If you're

0:25:01.640 --> 0:25:04.600
<v Speaker 5>a broker dealer and you're doing a very minimal amount

0:25:04.680 --> 0:25:07.919
<v Speaker 5>of commodity derivatives activity, perhaps you should have a primary

0:25:07.960 --> 0:25:11.399
<v Speaker 5>regulator at the SEC with some CFTC overlay to make

0:25:11.440 --> 0:25:12.880
<v Speaker 5>sure that there's no gaps.

0:25:13.240 --> 0:25:14.520
<v Speaker 4>So that that's an important piece.

0:25:14.800 --> 0:25:19.680
<v Speaker 5>I think a lot of the general crypto related issues

0:25:20.040 --> 0:25:25.320
<v Speaker 5>are really calling for joint rulemaking, joint work between the agencies,

0:25:25.400 --> 0:25:29.800
<v Speaker 5>because we're seeing Nvidia tokens on chain and not necessarily

0:25:29.800 --> 0:25:31.720
<v Speaker 5>within the US, but I think now with the DTC,

0:25:31.840 --> 0:25:33.679
<v Speaker 5>we're going to start seeing a lot more of the

0:25:33.720 --> 0:25:38.119
<v Speaker 5>tokenization of public equities, and then we're also seeing pitcoin

0:25:38.320 --> 0:25:42.440
<v Speaker 5>ether things that are within our territory trading on chain,

0:25:42.760 --> 0:25:44.520
<v Speaker 5>and those worlds are going to collide, and then they

0:25:44.520 --> 0:25:48.000
<v Speaker 5>are in fact colliding today, and so having common ground

0:25:48.080 --> 0:25:50.840
<v Speaker 5>between the agencies, figuring out what the ground rules are

0:25:51.560 --> 0:25:54.399
<v Speaker 5>and making sure that we have similar standards for decentralized

0:25:54.440 --> 0:25:56.800
<v Speaker 5>finance and for digital wallets and all of that's really

0:25:56.800 --> 0:26:00.719
<v Speaker 5>important because if we set incompatible standards, then it's going

0:26:00.800 --> 0:26:02.840
<v Speaker 5>to be a real disservice to the market, and that's

0:26:02.840 --> 0:26:04.440
<v Speaker 5>going to harm all Americans.

0:26:05.240 --> 0:26:05.480
<v Speaker 4>Kels.

0:26:05.480 --> 0:26:08.679
<v Speaker 2>She had an ad recently. It said pov is a girl,

0:26:08.840 --> 0:26:10.879
<v Speaker 2>and it said Puovy. I was about to be unable

0:26:10.920 --> 0:26:12.960
<v Speaker 2>to pay my rent, but I got two years of

0:26:13.040 --> 0:26:17.879
<v Speaker 2>rent through Kelshie's predictions. It's amazing. This seems more aggressive

0:26:18.000 --> 0:26:21.480
<v Speaker 2>even than you know, the traditional sports betting and there's

0:26:21.520 --> 0:26:24.600
<v Speaker 2>all kinds of sports betting ads, and then they have

0:26:24.640 --> 0:26:27.480
<v Speaker 2>a thing where you're a problem gambler call this number.

0:26:27.720 --> 0:26:31.720
<v Speaker 2>Should there be any limiting factor on how aggressively sports

0:26:31.920 --> 0:26:33.840
<v Speaker 2>these prediction markets should be advertised.

0:26:34.320 --> 0:26:37.359
<v Speaker 5>Well, that's one point that I think is worth double

0:26:37.400 --> 0:26:40.199
<v Speaker 5>clicking on, in the sense that there are standards for

0:26:40.320 --> 0:26:44.040
<v Speaker 5>futures commission mersions for the brokers within our markets, and

0:26:44.119 --> 0:26:48.359
<v Speaker 5>some of those standards are like essentially the way that

0:26:48.400 --> 0:26:53.119
<v Speaker 5>the Act and the regulations developed, where you have intermediation

0:26:53.520 --> 0:26:57.840
<v Speaker 5>between the customer and the clearinghouse and the exchange typically

0:26:57.880 --> 0:26:58.560
<v Speaker 5>in our markets.

0:26:58.640 --> 0:27:00.160
<v Speaker 4>Now these no Act.

0:27:00.320 --> 0:27:03.919
<v Speaker 5>Letters that started around two thousand that were given to

0:27:04.040 --> 0:27:07.159
<v Speaker 5>some of the prediction markets back then. Yeah, as well

0:27:07.240 --> 0:27:10.440
<v Speaker 5>as now other markets cut out the FCM cut out

0:27:10.480 --> 0:27:13.240
<v Speaker 5>the broker, and so you had direct to the clearing house,

0:27:13.280 --> 0:27:16.520
<v Speaker 5>direct to the exchange. And that model doesn't have all

0:27:16.560 --> 0:27:19.400
<v Speaker 5>the same rules and regulations, and so something that we're

0:27:19.440 --> 0:27:21.960
<v Speaker 5>thinking about is how do we make sure that we

0:27:21.960 --> 0:27:25.280
<v Speaker 5>have consistent standards across both. Now I think this question

0:27:25.320 --> 0:27:28.240
<v Speaker 5>of what sort of marketing and advertising either should be

0:27:28.280 --> 0:27:30.760
<v Speaker 5>able to engage in as one that we're certainly geving

0:27:30.800 --> 0:27:31.480
<v Speaker 5>to think about.

0:27:31.640 --> 0:27:33.919
<v Speaker 2>Sorry, just to be clear, there are current rules on

0:27:34.160 --> 0:27:37.520
<v Speaker 2>say a futures broker and how they can market. But

0:27:37.640 --> 0:27:41.240
<v Speaker 2>when these no action letters were established that allowed the

0:27:41.280 --> 0:27:44.640
<v Speaker 2>sort of the Future's entity itself to offer directly, they

0:27:44.640 --> 0:27:47.200
<v Speaker 2>didn't have the rules. What are the rules and wouldn't

0:27:47.240 --> 0:27:50.280
<v Speaker 2>add like these, like if a future is broker, like

0:27:50.400 --> 0:27:52.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, I forget MF Global or something, They're like, oh,

0:27:52.840 --> 0:27:56.080
<v Speaker 2>I couldn't pay my rent. But then now I'm you know,

0:27:56.200 --> 0:27:58.240
<v Speaker 2>now might now I'll never have to work again because

0:27:58.240 --> 0:28:01.199
<v Speaker 2>I traded whet futures. That seems a little weird and

0:28:01.280 --> 0:28:02.640
<v Speaker 2>I've never seen an ad like that.

0:28:02.720 --> 0:28:04.560
<v Speaker 5>Right, I mean, it really is this result of the

0:28:04.560 --> 0:28:06.919
<v Speaker 5>way that these no action letters were handed down, as

0:28:06.960 --> 0:28:09.320
<v Speaker 5>I said many many years ago, and this kind of

0:28:09.320 --> 0:28:12.560
<v Speaker 5>regime that we have that really my view on a

0:28:12.560 --> 0:28:14.240
<v Speaker 5>lot of this stuff is that we need clear rules

0:28:14.280 --> 0:28:16.160
<v Speaker 5>of the road. We need to do things through notice

0:28:16.160 --> 0:28:19.840
<v Speaker 5>and comment rulemaking, and actually think holistically about our markets

0:28:20.119 --> 0:28:22.800
<v Speaker 5>and not focus on these little patchwork no action letters,

0:28:22.800 --> 0:28:26.560
<v Speaker 5>which unfortunately has been the rule over many years. And

0:28:26.600 --> 0:28:28.639
<v Speaker 5>so that's definitely something we're thinking about. We want to

0:28:28.640 --> 0:28:31.320
<v Speaker 5>set clear standards. We want stakeholders out the table to

0:28:31.320 --> 0:28:33.680
<v Speaker 5>figure out what these regimes should look like. And I'm

0:28:33.680 --> 0:28:36.560
<v Speaker 5>not one necessarily to say what the marketing should look like.

0:28:36.600 --> 0:28:39.360
<v Speaker 5>We want to hear from participants as to what sort

0:28:39.400 --> 0:28:42.760
<v Speaker 5>of marketing they think's appropriate for these markets. But we're

0:28:42.760 --> 0:28:45.000
<v Speaker 5>certainly thinking about that, and there are different standards. It

0:28:45.040 --> 0:28:47.320
<v Speaker 5>really is just a result of the kind of ad

0:28:47.360 --> 0:28:50.640
<v Speaker 5>hoc way that regulators in the past have gone about

0:28:50.760 --> 0:28:54.160
<v Speaker 5>establishing exceptions for certain things in the markets.

0:28:54.360 --> 0:28:57.440
<v Speaker 3>Well, on this note, do you maybe need new classifications

0:28:57.440 --> 0:28:59.800
<v Speaker 3>because it seems like all these different worlds are kind

0:28:59.800 --> 0:29:02.719
<v Speaker 3>of melding together, where you might have a crypto trading

0:29:02.760 --> 0:29:07.040
<v Speaker 3>platform that's now offering derivatives and other things, and then

0:29:07.080 --> 0:29:10.280
<v Speaker 3>you have like an old school exchange that is offering

0:29:10.600 --> 0:29:14.720
<v Speaker 3>essentially bets like number go up, number go down. At

0:29:14.760 --> 0:29:18.320
<v Speaker 3>the moment, I think your registration categories are pretty like

0:29:19.200 --> 0:29:22.240
<v Speaker 3>standardized and you have three of them, is that right?

0:29:22.280 --> 0:29:25.800
<v Speaker 3>Like futures, exchange, swap execution stuff like that.

0:29:26.080 --> 0:29:28.320
<v Speaker 4>Oh, we've got too many, We've got many? Okay, anymore?

0:29:28.560 --> 0:29:29.000
<v Speaker 1>All right?

0:29:29.040 --> 0:29:31.560
<v Speaker 3>More than that? So could you create even more to

0:29:31.640 --> 0:29:35.520
<v Speaker 3>sort of encompass the industry changes that we're seeing.

0:29:35.720 --> 0:29:38.560
<v Speaker 5>Well, we certainly need to think holistically about what requirements

0:29:38.600 --> 0:29:41.840
<v Speaker 5>we have on different participants. So these non intermediated exchanges,

0:29:41.880 --> 0:29:44.000
<v Speaker 5>and we're also seeing a lot of vertical integration with

0:29:44.440 --> 0:29:48.440
<v Speaker 5>a single business owning a clearinghouse, an FCM, the broker,

0:29:48.560 --> 0:29:51.840
<v Speaker 5>and the exchange. We're seeing different models where there's the

0:29:51.920 --> 0:29:54.400
<v Speaker 5>non intermediated As I said, we don't have an FCM

0:29:54.400 --> 0:29:56.800
<v Speaker 5>at all, and then you have everything in between, and

0:29:56.840 --> 0:29:58.400
<v Speaker 5>so we need to think about that. We need to

0:29:58.440 --> 0:30:01.239
<v Speaker 5>make sure there's consistent standard. So we don't want a

0:30:01.280 --> 0:30:05.160
<v Speaker 5>regulatory arbitrage where because you don't have the broker, you're

0:30:05.200 --> 0:30:08.040
<v Speaker 5>able to do more. Now, the way that these have

0:30:08.080 --> 0:30:10.720
<v Speaker 5>been set up under no action letters today, they do

0:30:10.840 --> 0:30:15.240
<v Speaker 5>not allow for any margin, so they're fully collateralized. And

0:30:15.320 --> 0:30:18.920
<v Speaker 5>so if you go directly to the clearinghouse as a customer,

0:30:19.200 --> 0:30:22.000
<v Speaker 5>you're putting up full collateral, and so that's something as

0:30:22.000 --> 0:30:25.280
<v Speaker 5>well where we're seeing more institutional interests in these markets.

0:30:25.440 --> 0:30:27.440
<v Speaker 5>They would prefer to be able to put up margin

0:30:27.480 --> 0:30:30.240
<v Speaker 5>and go through a broker, or have a model where

0:30:30.240 --> 0:30:31.920
<v Speaker 5>you don't have the broker at all, but you're able

0:30:31.960 --> 0:30:34.640
<v Speaker 5>to use margin. So we're thinking about all these things.

0:30:34.680 --> 0:30:36.600
<v Speaker 5>It's a really interesting time, as I said, to be

0:30:36.640 --> 0:30:41.040
<v Speaker 5>thinking about market structure for things that really just probably

0:30:41.080 --> 0:30:44.719
<v Speaker 5>should have been done many years ago, and for whatever reason,

0:30:45.000 --> 0:30:47.240
<v Speaker 5>people relied on these no action letters and really I

0:30:47.280 --> 0:30:49.240
<v Speaker 5>guess it was more of an ankle biter at the

0:30:49.280 --> 0:30:51.280
<v Speaker 5>time and didn't get a full regime.

0:30:51.360 --> 0:30:52.600
<v Speaker 4>But we're thinking about all of that.

0:31:08.520 --> 0:31:11.160
<v Speaker 2>Donald Trump Junior is an advisor to Kelsey. He's on

0:31:11.160 --> 0:31:14.120
<v Speaker 2>the board of poly Market, and it looks like truth Social,

0:31:14.200 --> 0:31:17.080
<v Speaker 2>which is largely owned by President Trump, is also going

0:31:17.160 --> 0:31:20.320
<v Speaker 2>to launch something called truth predict. How should the public

0:31:20.360 --> 0:31:25.120
<v Speaker 2>feel comfortable that these are well regulated markets given the

0:31:25.440 --> 0:31:28.240
<v Speaker 2>very obvious sort of like stake that the president and

0:31:28.320 --> 0:31:29.640
<v Speaker 2>his family has in this industry.

0:31:30.120 --> 0:31:35.160
<v Speaker 5>These are designated contract markets like any other. We've regulated

0:31:35.200 --> 0:31:39.040
<v Speaker 5>these markets for many, many years for decades, they have

0:31:39.120 --> 0:31:42.960
<v Speaker 5>some of the most stringent regulatory requirements. As I mentioned,

0:31:43.200 --> 0:31:46.480
<v Speaker 5>these are nearly five hundred trillion dollars notional markets that

0:31:46.520 --> 0:31:49.239
<v Speaker 5>we regulate. We take it very seriously. We put these

0:31:49.320 --> 0:31:53.560
<v Speaker 5>fraud and manipulation these markets. So I think everybody can

0:31:54.080 --> 0:31:57.000
<v Speaker 5>rest asshore that we are on top of protecting the markets.

0:31:57.240 --> 0:31:59.480
<v Speaker 5>And we think it's great that there's a broad swath

0:31:59.520 --> 0:32:00.960
<v Speaker 5>of in the markets.

0:32:01.200 --> 0:32:03.640
<v Speaker 2>But like so for example, when you're figuring out, like

0:32:03.680 --> 0:32:07.680
<v Speaker 2>what is the appropriate level of advertising, going back to

0:32:08.080 --> 0:32:12.080
<v Speaker 2>those kelshy ads, and you're thinking, like okay, like talking

0:32:12.120 --> 0:32:14.720
<v Speaker 2>to market participants, like who is that? And like how

0:32:14.760 --> 0:32:17.760
<v Speaker 2>should people feel comfortable that you're going to find that

0:32:17.880 --> 0:32:20.440
<v Speaker 2>right line. Again, when the administration has like a very

0:32:20.480 --> 0:32:25.120
<v Speaker 2>clear economic stake in this industry and having the industry.

0:32:24.680 --> 0:32:26.280
<v Speaker 4>Grow, so we adhere to the law.

0:32:26.320 --> 0:32:29.400
<v Speaker 5>I mean, the Commodity Exchange Act is our authorizing statute.

0:32:29.520 --> 0:32:31.600
<v Speaker 5>We act in accordance with the Commodity Exchange Act, and

0:32:31.600 --> 0:32:34.760
<v Speaker 5>we have very strict ethics and you know, government requirements,

0:32:34.800 --> 0:32:37.680
<v Speaker 5>and as does I think everyone in this administration.

0:32:37.880 --> 0:32:39.440
<v Speaker 4>So we take off that very seriously.

0:32:39.960 --> 0:32:42.080
<v Speaker 3>So speaking of Trump, we should talk a little bit

0:32:42.080 --> 0:32:45.920
<v Speaker 3>more about crypto because it's been having a pretty bad

0:32:46.000 --> 0:32:49.480
<v Speaker 3>month so far, and I think one of the big

0:32:49.520 --> 0:32:52.640
<v Speaker 3>hopes of the industry, the Clarity Act, seems to be

0:32:52.880 --> 0:32:57.560
<v Speaker 3>stalled in Congress. What happens if that doesn't go through

0:32:57.720 --> 0:33:00.080
<v Speaker 3>because you've sort of I feel like you've committed your

0:33:00.080 --> 0:33:05.959
<v Speaker 3>self to being a crypto digital asset friendly regulator in

0:33:06.000 --> 0:33:06.880
<v Speaker 3>many ways.

0:33:07.160 --> 0:33:08.600
<v Speaker 4>Well thanks to the President's leadership.

0:33:08.600 --> 0:33:11.640
<v Speaker 5>I really do think we're at a critical moment where

0:33:11.760 --> 0:33:15.880
<v Speaker 5>we've got genius now as law regulation by enforcements done.

0:33:16.080 --> 0:33:19.120
<v Speaker 5>We've got the Clarity Act that's really on the precipice.

0:33:19.480 --> 0:33:22.560
<v Speaker 5>I think there's a few issues that are being ironed out.

0:33:22.560 --> 0:33:24.760
<v Speaker 5>Actually as we speak, I know there's a meeting today.

0:33:25.480 --> 0:33:27.400
<v Speaker 5>I'm more hopeful that that's going to get done. I

0:33:27.480 --> 0:33:30.480
<v Speaker 5>think that's going to set a really future proof framework

0:33:30.560 --> 0:33:34.080
<v Speaker 5>for crypto here in the US. We can't allow European

0:33:34.160 --> 0:33:39.280
<v Speaker 5>countries and others to lead in this area without US involvement, leadership,

0:33:39.320 --> 0:33:41.760
<v Speaker 5>and so we're committed to getting that done. I think

0:33:41.840 --> 0:33:45.560
<v Speaker 5>we've got a really great bill that's that's almost at

0:33:45.560 --> 0:33:46.520
<v Speaker 5>the finish line.

0:33:46.840 --> 0:33:48.160
<v Speaker 4>If it doesn't get done.

0:33:47.880 --> 0:33:49.840
<v Speaker 5>Look, I think there's a lot of authority that the

0:33:49.880 --> 0:33:53.520
<v Speaker 5>agencies have, but it's important with low or Bright and

0:33:53.560 --> 0:33:56.040
<v Speaker 5>some of the case law that takes a little bit

0:33:56.040 --> 0:34:00.600
<v Speaker 5>of the agency's discretion over nuances in the statue and

0:34:00.640 --> 0:34:03.440
<v Speaker 5>puts that back to Congress and the courts. I think

0:34:03.480 --> 0:34:06.160
<v Speaker 5>it's really important to have more baked into the statute

0:34:06.160 --> 0:34:08.080
<v Speaker 5>than not, and so we're hopeful that we'll get a

0:34:08.080 --> 0:34:08.840
<v Speaker 5>statute in place.

0:34:09.160 --> 0:34:11.080
<v Speaker 2>You know, one of the areas that crypto seems to

0:34:11.160 --> 0:34:14.879
<v Speaker 2>have been at the forefront of is perpetual futures and

0:34:14.960 --> 0:34:17.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, very popular. You see like you can get

0:34:17.640 --> 0:34:21.640
<v Speaker 2>one hundred and one leverage trading the futures on some platforms.

0:34:21.960 --> 0:34:25.920
<v Speaker 2>Do you see the more use of perpetual purpose in

0:34:25.960 --> 0:34:29.520
<v Speaker 2>a sort of traditional finance? Could we have perpetual oil

0:34:29.600 --> 0:34:32.200
<v Speaker 2>futures at some point? Like could you envision them?

0:34:32.480 --> 0:34:34.480
<v Speaker 5>Well, right now we're thinking about it in crypto. I

0:34:34.480 --> 0:34:35.799
<v Speaker 5>think they're real, Like, you.

0:34:35.760 --> 0:34:39.040
<v Speaker 2>Know, trade it on chain like all futures. Like again,

0:34:39.080 --> 0:34:42.520
<v Speaker 2>if we're like okay, crypto provides the infrastructure, but could

0:34:42.520 --> 0:34:45.719
<v Speaker 2>you like why not trade an oil purp on chain?

0:34:46.040 --> 0:34:48.840
<v Speaker 5>Look, if there's demand for these products, it's definitely something

0:34:48.840 --> 0:34:51.160
<v Speaker 5>that we're all consider and look at. Right now, the

0:34:51.200 --> 0:34:54.040
<v Speaker 5>overwhelming demand's been in the crypto space. We've seen some

0:34:54.160 --> 0:34:58.160
<v Speaker 5>demand in precious metals gold and silver. We have to

0:34:58.200 --> 0:35:02.520
<v Speaker 5>consider the susceptible of each contract to manipulation, So there

0:35:02.560 --> 0:35:05.920
<v Speaker 5>might be unique considerations around a contract that doesn't have

0:35:05.960 --> 0:35:11.120
<v Speaker 5>a physical delivery date for example pork bellies or other things,

0:35:11.320 --> 0:35:14.880
<v Speaker 5>and that can create issues within the supply and liquidity

0:35:14.880 --> 0:35:18.879
<v Speaker 5>for the futures contracts. So something we're thinking about. We're

0:35:18.920 --> 0:35:22.400
<v Speaker 5>definitely excited about all this innovation. It's been too long

0:35:22.480 --> 0:35:25.680
<v Speaker 5>that this stuff is only developed offshore, and we really

0:35:25.680 --> 0:35:28.120
<v Speaker 5>want to bring it back with clear rules of the road.

0:35:28.200 --> 0:35:30.840
<v Speaker 5>So it's really important that the US leads and that

0:35:30.880 --> 0:35:33.720
<v Speaker 5>we set the standard that other countries are going to follow,

0:35:33.840 --> 0:35:37.279
<v Speaker 5>rather than just allow this stuff to flourish offshore with

0:35:37.400 --> 0:35:40.680
<v Speaker 5>potentially less regulation. As you all know, when you offer

0:35:40.719 --> 0:35:44.399
<v Speaker 5>into various countries, there's different rules around offering directly in

0:35:44.520 --> 0:35:48.560
<v Speaker 5>or solicitation verse solicitation, all of that. So we're certainly

0:35:48.680 --> 0:35:50.640
<v Speaker 5>aware of that, we're thinking about it. We want to

0:35:50.680 --> 0:35:54.560
<v Speaker 5>set really clear and kind of best in class standards

0:35:54.600 --> 0:35:55.520
<v Speaker 5>for US markets.

0:35:56.160 --> 0:35:58.239
<v Speaker 3>Just going back to prediction markets, I know you keep

0:35:58.239 --> 0:36:03.120
<v Speaker 3>emphasizing that you're not a merit based regulator, right, so

0:36:03.160 --> 0:36:06.040
<v Speaker 3>you're not making decisions on what people should be betting

0:36:06.080 --> 0:36:08.359
<v Speaker 3>on or what they can bet on. But is there like,

0:36:09.000 --> 0:36:12.480
<v Speaker 3>is there a line at some point that you wouldn't

0:36:12.520 --> 0:36:16.319
<v Speaker 3>want to see private companies actually cross, Like if someone

0:36:16.320 --> 0:36:19.759
<v Speaker 3>creates a contract for like someone's going to die, right,

0:36:19.920 --> 0:36:23.520
<v Speaker 3>a violent death or something like that, that would seem problematic.

0:36:23.120 --> 0:36:25.400
<v Speaker 2>Or a contract that this came up when we talked

0:36:25.400 --> 0:36:29.480
<v Speaker 2>to Don Wilson in Chicago, the contract for whether people

0:36:29.480 --> 0:36:33.200
<v Speaker 2>would throw sex toys onto the court during a WNBA game, which,

0:36:33.239 --> 0:36:36.720
<v Speaker 2>of course the existence of the contract right illicit people

0:36:36.840 --> 0:36:40.120
<v Speaker 2>to do it change their behavior, also kind of dangerous,

0:36:40.280 --> 0:36:41.359
<v Speaker 2>Like where's the line?

0:36:41.440 --> 0:36:44.440
<v Speaker 5>The latter seems highly at risk of, you know, being

0:36:44.480 --> 0:36:47.600
<v Speaker 5>susceptible to pipulation, which we do have authority to reject.

0:36:48.120 --> 0:36:52.480
<v Speaker 5>I think with other categories assassination and the like, there

0:36:52.560 --> 0:36:55.480
<v Speaker 5>is authority within our statute to prohibit, so we would

0:36:55.560 --> 0:36:58.000
<v Speaker 5>exercise that authority. You know, there's certain areas where we

0:36:58.160 --> 0:37:02.480
<v Speaker 5>certainly would not want contracts being offered, but with others,

0:37:02.480 --> 0:37:04.799
<v Speaker 5>look where we're not, as I said, a merit regulator,

0:37:05.160 --> 0:37:06.880
<v Speaker 5>We're not going to go and say you can't have

0:37:06.960 --> 0:37:09.600
<v Speaker 5>a contract in sports you can't have a contract in politics,

0:37:09.640 --> 0:37:12.719
<v Speaker 5>but the details matter, and we are evaluating that.

0:37:13.480 --> 0:37:15.520
<v Speaker 2>Just going back to you know, the sort of basic question.

0:37:15.560 --> 0:37:19.080
<v Speaker 2>A lot of states attorneys generals are attorneys general? Did

0:37:19.080 --> 0:37:21.440
<v Speaker 2>I say that I pluralize the attorneys attorney? A lot

0:37:21.480 --> 0:37:24.279
<v Speaker 2>of states attorneys general. You know, there's a lot of

0:37:24.320 --> 0:37:27.080
<v Speaker 2>court fights about this. And they look at this and

0:37:27.160 --> 0:37:29.040
<v Speaker 2>like many people would, and they say, look, this is

0:37:29.280 --> 0:37:31.560
<v Speaker 2>this is betting, this is this is gambling. This certainly

0:37:31.560 --> 0:37:34.680
<v Speaker 2>looks like sports gambling. Kelsey himself ran ads that said

0:37:34.840 --> 0:37:37.120
<v Speaker 2>sports betting is now legal in your stay, and I

0:37:37.120 --> 0:37:41.200
<v Speaker 2>think they've pulled those back, et cetera. But from the

0:37:41.239 --> 0:37:44.680
<v Speaker 2>perspective of the public, it certainly looks like by putting

0:37:44.680 --> 0:37:48.880
<v Speaker 2>sports betting into this framework that it's undermined the ability

0:37:48.880 --> 0:37:51.000
<v Speaker 2>of states to like set the rules about who can

0:37:51.040 --> 0:37:51.560
<v Speaker 2>bet on one.

0:37:52.120 --> 0:37:55.680
<v Speaker 5>Well, there's a great law journal article by professor's and

0:37:55.880 --> 0:37:58.840
<v Speaker 5>he's a securities law professor. This must have been written

0:37:58.880 --> 0:38:01.160
<v Speaker 5>in the early two thousand, but it was before the

0:38:01.440 --> 0:38:09.160
<v Speaker 5>financial crisis. Comparing derivatives, futures, contracts, securities, insurance products, gambling.

0:38:09.640 --> 0:38:12.680
<v Speaker 5>These are all products that you can take similar economic

0:38:12.719 --> 0:38:16.000
<v Speaker 5>positions in, but they have different legal treatment, and it's

0:38:16.040 --> 0:38:18.600
<v Speaker 5>because the products are structured different ways. So an insurance

0:38:18.680 --> 0:38:22.040
<v Speaker 5>contract could be structured very similarly to a credit to

0:38:22.120 --> 0:38:24.680
<v Speaker 5>false swap, but you have an ensurable interest. So the

0:38:24.680 --> 0:38:26.839
<v Speaker 5>details do matter, and we are looking at that. So

0:38:26.880 --> 0:38:29.680
<v Speaker 5>it's not the case that we're going into the casinos

0:38:29.680 --> 0:38:33.520
<v Speaker 5>and saying you're offering legal off exchange swaps. But if

0:38:33.520 --> 0:38:36.680
<v Speaker 5>the products are structured as swaps, then we have authority there.

0:38:36.760 --> 0:38:40.640
<v Speaker 5>And so many of these platforms that are offering products

0:38:40.640 --> 0:38:42.920
<v Speaker 5>that may have some similar economic attributes.

0:38:43.200 --> 0:38:44.440
<v Speaker 4>But the details do matter.

0:38:44.520 --> 0:38:46.440
<v Speaker 5>Right, As I mentioned, you can you have to go

0:38:46.520 --> 0:38:49.960
<v Speaker 5>through a clearinghouse, the products can be offset, you can

0:38:49.960 --> 0:38:51.120
<v Speaker 5>get in and out of your position.

0:38:51.120 --> 0:38:52.320
<v Speaker 4>There are different they matter.

0:38:53.280 --> 0:38:55.600
<v Speaker 2>I totally get that. But do they matter from the

0:38:55.640 --> 0:38:58.960
<v Speaker 2>perspective of like a nineteen year old who's addicted to

0:38:59.000 --> 0:38:59.800
<v Speaker 2>betting on sports.

0:39:00.040 --> 0:39:03.200
<v Speaker 5>Well, I think that's a question for society as a whole,

0:39:03.640 --> 0:39:05.839
<v Speaker 5>for Congress, right, I mean, to the extent we don't

0:39:05.880 --> 0:39:08.680
<v Speaker 5>want a nineteen year old trading Nvidia stock options either.

0:39:09.080 --> 0:39:11.840
<v Speaker 4>That's something that you can talk to Congress about.

0:39:12.080 --> 0:39:15.360
<v Speaker 5>But the reality is that today we allow eighteen plus

0:39:15.360 --> 0:39:18.799
<v Speaker 5>in our financial markets, and there's responsibility associated with that,

0:39:18.840 --> 0:39:20.880
<v Speaker 5>they have to go through a broker. In many cases

0:39:21.200 --> 0:39:24.360
<v Speaker 5>there is this nuance of the non intermediated model, but

0:39:24.440 --> 0:39:27.200
<v Speaker 5>there's screening as well to be able to access those markets.

0:39:27.239 --> 0:39:29.280
<v Speaker 4>And so we do have standards, we do have rules.

0:39:29.280 --> 0:39:32.040
<v Speaker 5>Everything's done in accordance with an exchange rule book and

0:39:32.080 --> 0:39:34.799
<v Speaker 5>we enforce that and we are policing those markets. But

0:39:34.840 --> 0:39:39.960
<v Speaker 5>I think this more eternalistic question of what age should

0:39:40.000 --> 0:39:41.160
<v Speaker 5>be the age to be able to.

0:39:41.120 --> 0:39:42.160
<v Speaker 4>Participate in the markets.

0:39:42.400 --> 0:39:45.000
<v Speaker 5>These people can be drafted, go off to war, and

0:39:45.080 --> 0:39:47.920
<v Speaker 5>so a question of whether they can trade options on

0:39:48.600 --> 0:39:51.080
<v Speaker 5>the outcome of the super Bowl, you know.

0:39:51.120 --> 0:39:54.200
<v Speaker 4>I think that's not really for the regulator to decide.

0:39:54.360 --> 0:39:57.440
<v Speaker 3>You know, you said you were ramping up staffing to

0:39:57.800 --> 0:40:00.640
<v Speaker 3>you know, help regulate all these new markets. It's new

0:40:00.680 --> 0:40:04.360
<v Speaker 3>and fast growing markets. What's the hiring process or the

0:40:04.440 --> 0:40:07.640
<v Speaker 3>hiring experience actually like at the moment, because you know,

0:40:07.760 --> 0:40:11.000
<v Speaker 3>thinking back to last year twenty twenty five, all the

0:40:11.040 --> 0:40:15.040
<v Speaker 3>headlines when it came to government employment were you know, layoffs,

0:40:15.440 --> 0:40:19.680
<v Speaker 3>mass firing, streamlining. What's what's that like for you now?

0:40:19.719 --> 0:40:21.160
<v Speaker 3>Is it easy to get people in the door?

0:40:21.600 --> 0:40:23.759
<v Speaker 5>Well, look, there are there to the extent there are

0:40:24.000 --> 0:40:28.160
<v Speaker 5>areas where we need additional staff. We are evaluating based

0:40:28.200 --> 0:40:31.800
<v Speaker 5>on competence and the highest quality. We do not want

0:40:32.160 --> 0:40:34.479
<v Speaker 5>to just bring on bodies to bring on bodies. We're

0:40:34.480 --> 0:40:36.520
<v Speaker 5>making sure that we're bringing on the right people for

0:40:36.560 --> 0:40:40.520
<v Speaker 5>the rules, and in many cases we are very well staffed.

0:40:40.600 --> 0:40:42.440
<v Speaker 5>I think there are some needs that we're looking to

0:40:42.480 --> 0:40:45.760
<v Speaker 5>fill out, but again it's very much akin to hiring

0:40:45.760 --> 0:40:47.719
<v Speaker 5>it a private company. We're looking to bring on the

0:40:47.719 --> 0:40:50.400
<v Speaker 5>best and the brightest who really want to help revitalize

0:40:50.440 --> 0:40:53.440
<v Speaker 5>the agency, fill out needs for the agency. And we are,

0:40:53.600 --> 0:40:56.399
<v Speaker 5>as I mentioned earlier, relying a lot on technology as well,

0:40:56.440 --> 0:40:59.719
<v Speaker 5>because there's just so much that many years ago really

0:40:59.719 --> 0:41:01.879
<v Speaker 5>had to be done manually that can be done very

0:41:01.960 --> 0:41:04.080
<v Speaker 5>quickly through new technologies.

0:41:04.400 --> 0:41:06.560
<v Speaker 3>Well, this has been a perennial question, which is how

0:41:06.600 --> 0:41:10.120
<v Speaker 3>government agencies actually compete with the private sector to get

0:41:10.280 --> 0:41:13.040
<v Speaker 3>good people. How are you doing that at the moment

0:41:13.160 --> 0:41:16.200
<v Speaker 3>given that, I mean, I imagine you have some form

0:41:16.440 --> 0:41:20.840
<v Speaker 3>of budget constraint, and I would imagine that it's probably

0:41:21.520 --> 0:41:24.040
<v Speaker 3>your budget is not as big as like, I don't know,

0:41:24.200 --> 0:41:27.560
<v Speaker 3>CMEs or something like that. How do you actually compete?

0:41:28.440 --> 0:41:30.719
<v Speaker 5>Well, look, I think part of that's the mission. We

0:41:31.200 --> 0:41:35.680
<v Speaker 5>are really interested in making sure that these markets flourish

0:41:35.719 --> 0:41:38.680
<v Speaker 5>here in the United States. It's an exciting time. Many

0:41:38.760 --> 0:41:41.440
<v Speaker 5>people are interested in being able to contribute to that effort.

0:41:41.440 --> 0:41:45.000
<v Speaker 5>We're really, as I said earlier, setting new market structure

0:41:45.239 --> 0:41:49.759
<v Speaker 5>for this asset class as well as for blockchain based markets,

0:41:50.040 --> 0:41:51.600
<v Speaker 5>and a lot of the things that needed to be

0:41:51.640 --> 0:41:53.839
<v Speaker 5>fixed in the wake of Dot frank that frankly were

0:41:53.880 --> 0:41:57.080
<v Speaker 5>never fixed. So I think it's in part mission impart

0:41:57.120 --> 0:41:59.480
<v Speaker 5>people that are willing to serve and come in and

0:41:59.520 --> 0:42:01.640
<v Speaker 5>maybe they don't don't get the salary that they get

0:42:01.680 --> 0:42:04.680
<v Speaker 5>in the private sector, but that's not necessarily a bad thing.

0:42:04.719 --> 0:42:07.200
<v Speaker 5>They get a lot of value out of being working

0:42:07.400 --> 0:42:08.040
<v Speaker 5>for the government.

0:42:08.320 --> 0:42:10.880
<v Speaker 2>Going back to the question of like marketing and again

0:42:11.239 --> 0:42:14.560
<v Speaker 2>gambling marketing, there's always like some line or whatever about

0:42:14.560 --> 0:42:17.799
<v Speaker 2>people who get addicted. Would you like Congress to come

0:42:17.840 --> 0:42:21.279
<v Speaker 2>in and create rules? Should Congress come up with the

0:42:21.360 --> 0:42:24.040
<v Speaker 2>rule about prediction market advertising.

0:42:25.400 --> 0:42:28.279
<v Speaker 5>We've got a lot of authority to regulate our participants.

0:42:28.520 --> 0:42:31.919
<v Speaker 5>I think there's sometimes a real need for Congress, maybe

0:42:31.920 --> 0:42:34.359
<v Speaker 5>to the extent as you all mentioned, if you really

0:42:34.360 --> 0:42:37.120
<v Speaker 5>want to set some sort of more paternalists stick rule

0:42:37.200 --> 0:42:39.400
<v Speaker 5>around you have to be eighteen era twenty one to

0:42:39.400 --> 0:42:40.520
<v Speaker 5>participate in the markets.

0:42:40.920 --> 0:42:41.799
<v Speaker 4>That sort of thing.

0:42:41.920 --> 0:42:45.000
<v Speaker 5>Sure, you can talk to Congress about with respect to

0:42:45.040 --> 0:42:48.520
<v Speaker 5>the more nuanced pieces of how we regulate the markets.

0:42:48.560 --> 0:42:52.960
<v Speaker 5>That's stuff that we handle. It's not typically baked into statute.

0:42:53.040 --> 0:42:55.279
<v Speaker 5>We go through our notice and comment process and get

0:42:55.400 --> 0:42:57.640
<v Speaker 5>input from the public on those sorts of things. So

0:42:57.640 --> 0:42:59.400
<v Speaker 5>I don't necessarily think you need to kick everything to

0:42:59.480 --> 0:43:02.799
<v Speaker 5>Congress within the details, but it certainly could be something

0:43:03.000 --> 0:43:03.600
<v Speaker 5>that people.

0:43:03.760 --> 0:43:05.919
<v Speaker 2>It's a lot of countries, you know, regard or sorry,

0:43:05.960 --> 0:43:08.440
<v Speaker 2>a lot of states regard like okay under twenty one,

0:43:08.520 --> 0:43:10.520
<v Speaker 2>like we don't want that right, And it sounds like

0:43:10.560 --> 0:43:14.239
<v Speaker 2>you regard that as paternalism in action, which you know,

0:43:14.400 --> 0:43:17.440
<v Speaker 2>I understand a lot of people share that view. But

0:43:18.080 --> 0:43:20.200
<v Speaker 2>you know, it also seems like the CFTC. You know,

0:43:20.760 --> 0:43:23.719
<v Speaker 2>people have different views, and it sounds like the CFTC

0:43:23.880 --> 0:43:26.799
<v Speaker 2>is sort of undermining of value that a state might

0:43:26.880 --> 0:43:27.760
<v Speaker 2>have about gambling.

0:43:28.440 --> 0:43:29.319
<v Speaker 4>I don't view it that way.

0:43:29.520 --> 0:43:33.680
<v Speaker 5>I do think our derivatives' markets are a separate area

0:43:33.920 --> 0:43:38.880
<v Speaker 5>within government and within the law, as opposed to the state.

0:43:38.680 --> 0:43:39.440
<v Speaker 4>Gambling and the.

0:43:41.200 --> 0:43:45.280
<v Speaker 5>Rules and requirements that govern a state casino are very different.

0:43:45.680 --> 0:43:48.440
<v Speaker 5>They can do a lot different things than what a

0:43:48.800 --> 0:43:51.719
<v Speaker 5>regulated futures exchange can do, and so I do think

0:43:51.760 --> 0:43:55.279
<v Speaker 5>there's some give and take, some for sure limitation on

0:43:55.440 --> 0:43:58.360
<v Speaker 5>the age piece. But look, you can serve alcohol and

0:43:58.360 --> 0:44:00.080
<v Speaker 5>a casino and allow people to bet on sport, or

0:44:00.200 --> 0:44:03.640
<v Speaker 5>you can't do that necessarily at a digital exchange.

0:44:03.680 --> 0:44:05.240
<v Speaker 4>Maybe somebody's got to beer on the side.

0:44:05.280 --> 0:44:07.799
<v Speaker 5>But I do think there's a lot of different restrictions

0:44:08.040 --> 0:44:10.160
<v Speaker 5>in a different environment in which people are trading, so

0:44:10.200 --> 0:44:11.680
<v Speaker 5>it's not quite apple stables.

0:44:11.920 --> 0:44:14.880
<v Speaker 2>Mike Seeling, thank you so much for coming on odd laws,

0:44:14.920 --> 0:44:16.640
<v Speaker 2>a perfect guess at the perfect time.

0:44:16.840 --> 0:44:17.719
<v Speaker 4>Thanks for having me.

0:44:30.000 --> 0:44:34.400
<v Speaker 3>I enjoyed that conversation me too. However, there are a

0:44:34.480 --> 0:44:39.439
<v Speaker 3>number of difficulties with regulating prediction markets, and I'm kind

0:44:39.440 --> 0:44:42.399
<v Speaker 3>of trying to like zoom in on what I think

0:44:42.480 --> 0:44:46.040
<v Speaker 3>might be the primary one. So Number one, the CFTC

0:44:46.120 --> 0:44:49.920
<v Speaker 3>exists to regulate risk management, right, which is what Mike said.

0:44:51.400 --> 0:44:55.040
<v Speaker 3>It is very doubtful to me that someone needs to

0:44:55.120 --> 0:44:59.799
<v Speaker 3>manage their exposure to Cardi B performing on stage at

0:44:59.800 --> 0:45:03.880
<v Speaker 3>the Super Bowl, So it's not even entirely clear to

0:45:04.000 --> 0:45:07.680
<v Speaker 3>me that this is an industry that the CFTC should

0:45:07.719 --> 0:45:12.040
<v Speaker 3>be regulating. Now that said, that's a big tension, yeah, right,

0:45:12.080 --> 0:45:16.239
<v Speaker 3>And then just beyond that, you could certainly argue that

0:45:16.400 --> 0:45:22.120
<v Speaker 3>by legitimizing prediction markets and helping them to grow, you

0:45:22.160 --> 0:45:26.360
<v Speaker 3>are in fact introducing a new risk into the system

0:45:26.480 --> 0:45:29.120
<v Speaker 3>because everyone's going to start gambling away I don't know,

0:45:29.160 --> 0:45:31.200
<v Speaker 3>their college funds or whatever, you know.

0:45:31.320 --> 0:45:34.799
<v Speaker 2>I think Mike made an interesting observation sort of near

0:45:34.840 --> 0:45:38.040
<v Speaker 2>the end of the conversation that like, and it's totally true,

0:45:38.080 --> 0:45:44.560
<v Speaker 2>like different market structures warrant different types of regulatory treatment, right, so,

0:45:44.680 --> 0:45:47.040
<v Speaker 2>and I think that makes sense. I think what's interesting

0:45:47.080 --> 0:45:50.240
<v Speaker 2>though about this conversation, particularly as it relates to sports betting,

0:45:50.440 --> 0:45:54.040
<v Speaker 2>is that part of the reason that states have sort

0:45:54.080 --> 0:45:57.359
<v Speaker 2>of in many cases either no sports betting or very

0:45:57.400 --> 0:46:00.440
<v Speaker 2>stringent rules about who can engage in sports betting has

0:46:00.480 --> 0:46:03.759
<v Speaker 2>nothing to do with financial risk and everything to do

0:46:03.800 --> 0:46:06.320
<v Speaker 2>with a sort of like moral choice about who gets

0:46:06.360 --> 0:46:09.040
<v Speaker 2>to sports bet And so, you know, on one head

0:46:09.120 --> 0:46:11.680
<v Speaker 2>is like, okay, there's like traditional sports books, they have

0:46:11.719 --> 0:46:14.239
<v Speaker 2>a house that sets the odds. It's definitely true that

0:46:14.280 --> 0:46:17.960
<v Speaker 2>prediction market companies have like a different market structure, but

0:46:18.080 --> 0:46:20.440
<v Speaker 2>from a sort of like why does society want to

0:46:20.480 --> 0:46:23.680
<v Speaker 2>constrain the role of sports betting. It's not because of

0:46:23.760 --> 0:46:26.719
<v Speaker 2>like any sort of like financial instability risk, because we

0:46:26.760 --> 0:46:29.400
<v Speaker 2>don't want certain people like eighteen year olds, people who

0:46:29.480 --> 0:46:32.400
<v Speaker 2>might still be in high school, having access to sports betting.

0:46:32.760 --> 0:46:35.440
<v Speaker 2>And when the c OFTC says, like, you know, this

0:46:35.520 --> 0:46:38.160
<v Speaker 2>is just this is a new type of financial instrument

0:46:38.160 --> 0:46:40.600
<v Speaker 2>that should be regulated like a financial instrument, it sort

0:46:40.600 --> 0:46:43.640
<v Speaker 2>of undercuts that sort of choice that the state has made.

0:46:43.800 --> 0:46:46.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, exactly do you think sports betting is like the

0:46:47.000 --> 0:46:47.960
<v Speaker 3>new monoculture?

0:46:48.280 --> 0:46:50.480
<v Speaker 2>It is really incredible how pervasive it is, and it's

0:46:50.520 --> 0:46:53.520
<v Speaker 2>really incredible. But also it's just incredible, you know, truly

0:46:53.560 --> 0:46:56.200
<v Speaker 2>how pervasive betting on everything is. And you know, I

0:46:56.200 --> 0:47:01.799
<v Speaker 2>should say like I am an enthusiastic consumer of the

0:47:01.840 --> 0:47:03.960
<v Speaker 2>prediction market's data, you know, like I said at the

0:47:04.040 --> 0:47:07.440
<v Speaker 2>very beginning, like I now on all kinds of things,

0:47:07.560 --> 0:47:09.879
<v Speaker 2>including FED decisions. You know, Like I think it's very

0:47:09.960 --> 0:47:13.040
<v Speaker 2>useful to say, like you look at like certain measures

0:47:13.040 --> 0:47:15.319
<v Speaker 2>of like I don't know, you know, the FED fund

0:47:15.360 --> 0:47:18.200
<v Speaker 2>swaps or whatever, like you just look at WORP. I

0:47:18.239 --> 0:47:20.200
<v Speaker 2>love WORP too, but like as simple we have it

0:47:20.239 --> 0:47:22.279
<v Speaker 2>on the Bloomberg now poly market. Will there be three

0:47:22.320 --> 0:47:25.759
<v Speaker 2>rate cuts this year? That is also a useful instrument

0:47:25.840 --> 0:47:28.799
<v Speaker 2>to have. But there are a lot of things that

0:47:28.880 --> 0:47:32.560
<v Speaker 2>prediction markets have and again that a aren't that but

0:47:32.680 --> 0:47:34.160
<v Speaker 2>I you know, I like a lot of them. I

0:47:34.239 --> 0:47:36.760
<v Speaker 2>like looking at election ods. I like looking at whether

0:47:37.120 --> 0:47:40.360
<v Speaker 2>the odds of like some company what they're going to say, Like,

0:47:40.360 --> 0:47:42.239
<v Speaker 2>I think there's a lot of useful signal from them.

0:47:42.520 --> 0:47:45.120
<v Speaker 2>It's also true that the platforms are largely sports betting

0:47:45.120 --> 0:47:45.399
<v Speaker 2>at this.

0:47:45.320 --> 0:47:48.200
<v Speaker 3>Point, right right, how much signal do you actually need

0:47:48.239 --> 0:47:51.920
<v Speaker 3>about I don't know, the Super Bowl. I'm sure some

0:47:51.960 --> 0:47:55.480
<v Speaker 3>people are really into it, but from a trading.

0:47:55.800 --> 0:47:59.560
<v Speaker 2>Sort of from a financial regulation standpoint, it's a different

0:47:59.600 --> 0:48:02.880
<v Speaker 2>question anyway. And it's also true, by the way, that

0:48:02.960 --> 0:48:06.960
<v Speaker 2>the Trump family is very invested, quite literally into this space,

0:48:07.000 --> 0:48:10.640
<v Speaker 2>and I think that quite reasonably. Should you know, raise

0:48:10.680 --> 0:48:15.080
<v Speaker 2>some questions about like how policy is being made about

0:48:15.160 --> 0:48:17.120
<v Speaker 2>the growth of this industry incentives?

0:48:17.239 --> 0:48:18.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, for sure? All right, shall we leave it there.

0:48:19.000 --> 0:48:19.759
<v Speaker 2>Let's leave it there.

0:48:20.000 --> 0:48:22.240
<v Speaker 3>This has been another episode of the oud Loots podcast.

0:48:22.320 --> 0:48:25.439
<v Speaker 3>I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me at Tracy Alloway and.

0:48:25.360 --> 0:48:28.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm Jill Wisenthal. You can follow me at the Stalwart,

0:48:28.520 --> 0:48:31.720
<v Speaker 2>follow our guest Michael Selig He's at Michael Selig. Follow

0:48:31.719 --> 0:48:35.080
<v Speaker 2>our producers Carmen Rodriguez at Carmen Rmann, dash Ol Bennett

0:48:35.080 --> 0:48:38.840
<v Speaker 2>at Dashbot, and Kelbrooks at Kilbrooks. And for odd Laws content,

0:48:38.880 --> 0:48:41.040
<v Speaker 2>go to Bloomberg dot com slash odd Lots for a

0:48:41.040 --> 0:48:43.560
<v Speaker 2>the daily newsletter and all of our episodes, and you

0:48:43.600 --> 0:48:45.680
<v Speaker 2>can shat about all of these topics twenty four seven

0:48:45.800 --> 0:48:49.120
<v Speaker 2>in our discord discord dot gg slash outlines.

0:48:49.440 --> 0:48:51.640
<v Speaker 3>And if you enjoy odd Lots, if you like it

0:48:51.680 --> 0:48:54.520
<v Speaker 3>when we talk about regulating prediction markets, then please leave

0:48:54.560 --> 0:48:58.040
<v Speaker 3>us a positive review on your favorite podcast platform. And remember,

0:48:58.080 --> 0:49:00.160
<v Speaker 3>if you are a Bloomberg subscriber, you can listen listen

0:49:00.239 --> 0:49:03.120
<v Speaker 3>to all of our episodes absolutely add free. All you

0:49:03.160 --> 0:49:05.240
<v Speaker 3>need to do is find the Bloomberg channel on Apple

0:49:05.280 --> 0:49:08.480
<v Speaker 3>Podcasts and follow the instructions there. Thanks for listening