1 00:00:02,720 --> 00:00:14,000 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News. 2 00:00:18,360 --> 00:00:21,440 Speaker 2: Hello and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots Podcast. 3 00:00:21,480 --> 00:00:23,720 Speaker 3: I'm Joe Wisenthal, and I'm Tracy Alloway. 4 00:00:23,960 --> 00:00:25,319 Speaker 2: Tracy, did you watch the Super Bowl? 5 00:00:26,200 --> 00:00:26,239 Speaker 3: No? 6 00:00:26,320 --> 00:00:28,000 Speaker 2: I was going to ask that, didn't I knew it. 7 00:00:28,080 --> 00:00:31,400 Speaker 3: Actually, I was going to start exactly the same way. 8 00:00:31,680 --> 00:00:34,240 Speaker 3: I did watch the Super Bowl, And so I feel 9 00:00:34,240 --> 00:00:38,040 Speaker 3: empowered to ask you a very controversial question. Oh yeah, 10 00:00:38,120 --> 00:00:42,360 Speaker 3: not which halftime show you watched, but did Cardi be 11 00:00:42,720 --> 00:00:44,720 Speaker 3: perform at the Super Bowl? 12 00:00:45,200 --> 00:00:46,920 Speaker 1: Oh? 13 00:00:47,040 --> 00:00:49,239 Speaker 2: Right, because this was a big thing. I forgot that 14 00:00:49,240 --> 00:00:51,840 Speaker 2: there was, you know what, I'm aware of various sort 15 00:00:51,880 --> 00:00:54,840 Speaker 2: of questions about prediction markets and things that people place 16 00:00:54,960 --> 00:00:57,080 Speaker 2: bets on. Well, how did that resolve? What was what 17 00:00:57,200 --> 00:00:58,160 Speaker 2: was the basic issue here? 18 00:00:58,160 --> 00:01:02,040 Speaker 3: Again? So I think it's still being resolved in various ways. 19 00:01:02,080 --> 00:01:05,120 Speaker 3: But Cardi b she was on set during Bad Bunnies 20 00:01:06,240 --> 00:01:10,759 Speaker 3: Extravaganza and she was kind of like dancing and singing along, 21 00:01:10,880 --> 00:01:13,600 Speaker 3: like mouthing words at least along with other people like 22 00:01:13,640 --> 00:01:15,800 Speaker 3: Pedro Pascal and Jessica Alba. 23 00:01:15,640 --> 00:01:20,120 Speaker 2: Yea Lady Gaga, well like singing right. 24 00:01:20,240 --> 00:01:23,200 Speaker 3: So the only reason this matters at all is because 25 00:01:23,240 --> 00:01:26,560 Speaker 3: of prediction Markets. So there was a bet will Cardi 26 00:01:26,640 --> 00:01:29,960 Speaker 3: be perform? And now the question is does standing on 27 00:01:30,080 --> 00:01:32,640 Speaker 3: stage and kind of bobbing your head and mouthing words 28 00:01:32,760 --> 00:01:37,600 Speaker 3: count as a performance? Polymarket says it does, cal She 29 00:01:38,160 --> 00:01:38,839 Speaker 3: says it doesn't. 30 00:01:38,920 --> 00:01:41,039 Speaker 2: Oh interesting, Yeah, there you go call She and poly 31 00:01:41,120 --> 00:01:44,440 Speaker 2: Markets split over whether Cardi b performed. That's a great tension. 32 00:01:44,600 --> 00:01:45,080 Speaker 3: I like that. 33 00:01:45,440 --> 00:01:47,520 Speaker 2: It was striking to me, setting aside that I actually 34 00:01:47,520 --> 00:01:50,200 Speaker 2: somehow seem to have missed the specific thing like how 35 00:01:50,280 --> 00:01:54,840 Speaker 2: much prediction markets are now just part of the consumption experience, 36 00:01:54,960 --> 00:01:57,320 Speaker 2: you know, even you look at all these different things 37 00:01:57,320 --> 00:02:01,040 Speaker 2: that people are talking about eighty Gaga going to show 38 00:02:01,080 --> 00:02:03,160 Speaker 2: up somehow, like someone made a bet on it before 39 00:02:03,360 --> 00:02:06,800 Speaker 2: it went public. But also just like with each score, 40 00:02:07,400 --> 00:02:09,399 Speaker 2: you know, you check the line, it's like how much 41 00:02:09,440 --> 00:02:13,200 Speaker 2: did this move the expectations of whether the Seahawks are leading? 42 00:02:13,280 --> 00:02:17,040 Speaker 2: Like prediction markets are truly becoming part of like pop 43 00:02:17,080 --> 00:02:18,960 Speaker 2: culture and how we interact with pop culture. 44 00:02:19,040 --> 00:02:22,360 Speaker 3: There were some weird bets around, like color of gatorade 45 00:02:22,360 --> 00:02:24,440 Speaker 3: that was going to get dumped on the coach. Yeah, 46 00:02:25,000 --> 00:02:29,440 Speaker 3: lengths of like the national anthem being sung? Yeah, did 47 00:02:29,440 --> 00:02:31,440 Speaker 3: you see that? Like I was tempted by some of those, 48 00:02:31,480 --> 00:02:32,760 Speaker 3: but I stayed away. 49 00:02:33,680 --> 00:02:37,800 Speaker 2: I've still I haven't used poly market or Kelsey probably was. 50 00:02:38,120 --> 00:02:38,320 Speaker 1: You know. 51 00:02:38,400 --> 00:02:40,840 Speaker 2: The interesting thing too, is like how much the mood 52 00:02:40,880 --> 00:02:43,960 Speaker 2: has swung, right cause a few years ago, like I 53 00:02:43,960 --> 00:02:46,280 Speaker 2: don't know, twenty twenty two, twenty twenty three, I think 54 00:02:46,320 --> 00:02:49,640 Speaker 2: we did an episode like at that time, like there 55 00:02:49,680 --> 00:02:52,560 Speaker 2: was almost nothing and the sort of like regulatory one 56 00:02:52,600 --> 00:02:56,280 Speaker 2: to eighty. The degree to the liberalization of these markets 57 00:02:56,480 --> 00:02:59,160 Speaker 2: has been pretty remarkable, even you know, going back to 58 00:02:59,240 --> 00:03:01,600 Speaker 2: a year and a half go, there was just a 59 00:03:01,600 --> 00:03:04,680 Speaker 2: polymarket and it was just the offshore version that you 60 00:03:04,720 --> 00:03:08,160 Speaker 2: had to fund with stable coins, and now it's like exploded. 61 00:03:08,480 --> 00:03:12,079 Speaker 2: At the time, you know, Kelshi was very limited. They 62 00:03:12,080 --> 00:03:16,120 Speaker 2: didn't have US access, et cetera, or very curtailed US access. Anyway, 63 00:03:16,440 --> 00:03:18,639 Speaker 2: they're here and everyone's trying to wrap their heads on 64 00:03:18,919 --> 00:03:20,200 Speaker 2: where this is all going and stuff. 65 00:03:20,280 --> 00:03:22,880 Speaker 3: Yeah, it feels like they're much more sanctioned, I guess 66 00:03:22,880 --> 00:03:23,520 Speaker 3: than they used to. 67 00:03:23,600 --> 00:03:23,760 Speaker 4: Yeah. 68 00:03:23,840 --> 00:03:26,760 Speaker 3: Yeah, but that said, there are still some issues that 69 00:03:26,800 --> 00:03:30,119 Speaker 3: people are trying to work out. You have ambiguous outcomes 70 00:03:30,280 --> 00:03:33,960 Speaker 3: like did Cardi B actually perform? You have concerns around 71 00:03:33,960 --> 00:03:37,480 Speaker 3: insider trading, No, not insider trading per se, because we're 72 00:03:37,520 --> 00:03:41,040 Speaker 3: not talking about securities contracts, but maybe people with insider 73 00:03:41,240 --> 00:03:45,280 Speaker 3: info who inadvertently disclosed something material. I was thinking about 74 00:03:45,320 --> 00:03:47,960 Speaker 3: this actually, So you can also bet on which companies 75 00:03:48,000 --> 00:03:50,800 Speaker 3: are going to run Super Bowl ads. Oh yeah, and 76 00:03:51,200 --> 00:03:54,480 Speaker 3: a lot of people must know if a company is 77 00:03:54,520 --> 00:03:56,200 Speaker 3: going to run an ad like that, you have like 78 00:03:56,240 --> 00:03:59,920 Speaker 3: the agency and actors like everyone, And you could argue 79 00:04:00,080 --> 00:04:03,480 Speaker 3: maybe that that's material non public information. Right, you run 80 00:04:03,480 --> 00:04:05,320 Speaker 3: a Super Bowl ad, you get a bunch of attention. 81 00:04:05,720 --> 00:04:08,640 Speaker 3: Maybe your share price goes up if you're publicly listed. Yeah, 82 00:04:08,680 --> 00:04:09,080 Speaker 3: I don't know. 83 00:04:09,240 --> 00:04:11,640 Speaker 2: There are so many things anyway, rather than us just 84 00:04:11,720 --> 00:04:13,640 Speaker 2: keep talking about them because we can talk for an hour. 85 00:04:13,880 --> 00:04:16,800 Speaker 2: We really do have the perfect guest. We're going to 86 00:04:16,839 --> 00:04:19,239 Speaker 2: be speaking with Mike Selig. He is the new chairman 87 00:04:19,320 --> 00:04:23,000 Speaker 2: of the CFTC, the main regulator for prediction markets, who's 88 00:04:23,040 --> 00:04:26,400 Speaker 2: just sworn in in December. We're going to talk all 89 00:04:26,440 --> 00:04:29,120 Speaker 2: about this, maybe some crypto as well. So, Mike, thank 90 00:04:29,120 --> 00:04:31,200 Speaker 2: you so much for coming on out Locks, coming into 91 00:04:31,200 --> 00:04:32,000 Speaker 2: the studio. 92 00:04:31,839 --> 00:04:32,600 Speaker 4: Glad to be here. 93 00:04:33,000 --> 00:04:35,320 Speaker 2: Why do you tell us a little bit about just 94 00:04:35,640 --> 00:04:38,680 Speaker 2: broadly coming into this new role, like what are your 95 00:04:38,680 --> 00:04:40,760 Speaker 2: goals here with the CFTC. 96 00:04:40,800 --> 00:04:43,640 Speaker 5: Or really at a pivotal moment you mentioned prediction markets, 97 00:04:43,680 --> 00:04:48,039 Speaker 5: crypto AI, all manner of new technologies and products that 98 00:04:48,080 --> 00:04:51,840 Speaker 5: are impacting our markets. And the CFTC was really this 99 00:04:52,080 --> 00:04:55,160 Speaker 5: kind of little known regulator before the Financial crisis, regulating 100 00:04:55,200 --> 00:04:58,880 Speaker 5: the futures markets. It has expanded jurisdiction now or the 101 00:04:58,920 --> 00:05:02,599 Speaker 5: swaps markets, counter derivatives markets, and now we see so 102 00:05:02,680 --> 00:05:05,320 Speaker 5: much innovation in that space with things like prediction markets 103 00:05:05,360 --> 00:05:09,719 Speaker 5: and crypto, with legislation on the perverge of hopefully being 104 00:05:09,720 --> 00:05:12,599 Speaker 5: on the President's desk, and so the agency is really 105 00:05:12,640 --> 00:05:15,880 Speaker 5: at this unique moment where it has the opportunity to 106 00:05:16,000 --> 00:05:18,400 Speaker 5: shape the future of these new and emerging markets, and 107 00:05:18,600 --> 00:05:20,320 Speaker 5: it's really exciting time to be in the seat. 108 00:05:20,800 --> 00:05:23,279 Speaker 3: Do you have an opinion on whether Cardi B performed 109 00:05:23,320 --> 00:05:25,400 Speaker 3: at the Super Bowl? I mean, it's funny, but it's 110 00:05:25,440 --> 00:05:28,360 Speaker 3: also kind of irrelevant because I saw someone has actually 111 00:05:28,400 --> 00:05:32,840 Speaker 3: filed a complaint to the Commission about Calshi's decisions specifically. 112 00:05:33,040 --> 00:05:35,520 Speaker 5: Well, of course we're spending a lot of resources investigating 113 00:05:35,560 --> 00:05:40,000 Speaker 5: whether Cardi B performed advocating. Really our focus here is 114 00:05:40,320 --> 00:05:43,240 Speaker 5: on the market, so the unique thing that the great 115 00:05:43,279 --> 00:05:45,599 Speaker 5: thing about the way that we regulate the markets is 116 00:05:45,600 --> 00:05:49,000 Speaker 5: that the exchanges themselves, similar to on the security side, 117 00:05:49,160 --> 00:05:52,760 Speaker 5: are self regulatory organizations. So each exchange has its own 118 00:05:52,800 --> 00:05:55,560 Speaker 5: rule book that's been approved by the agency. It has 119 00:05:55,600 --> 00:05:59,039 Speaker 5: its own requirements for contracts that are certified on the exchange. 120 00:05:59,240 --> 00:06:01,760 Speaker 5: So of course the card contracts went through a self 121 00:06:01,760 --> 00:06:05,839 Speaker 5: certification process and then they're settled in accordance with exchange rules. 122 00:06:05,839 --> 00:06:07,280 Speaker 4: They go through a clearinghouse as well. 123 00:06:07,680 --> 00:06:10,760 Speaker 5: So the exchanges each have these rule books and certain 124 00:06:10,800 --> 00:06:13,920 Speaker 5: requirements around how the contracts are resolved and settled. And 125 00:06:13,960 --> 00:06:17,080 Speaker 5: of course now we're seeing some differences amongst call She's 126 00:06:17,160 --> 00:06:19,120 Speaker 5: rulebook and poly Market's rule book. 127 00:06:19,160 --> 00:06:20,920 Speaker 4: But that's the great thing about our markets. 128 00:06:20,720 --> 00:06:22,960 Speaker 5: And having the ability to build a business, to develop 129 00:06:23,000 --> 00:06:26,440 Speaker 5: an exchange with some flexible guardrails on top that the 130 00:06:26,440 --> 00:06:29,680 Speaker 5: agency oversees. But we don't prescribe exactly what has to 131 00:06:29,760 --> 00:06:31,440 Speaker 5: be in the rule book. We have a principles based 132 00:06:31,480 --> 00:06:32,440 Speaker 5: system of regulation. 133 00:06:32,960 --> 00:06:36,440 Speaker 2: What is the basis for something like is CARDI B 134 00:06:36,680 --> 00:06:39,719 Speaker 2: going to perform at the Super Bowl? Have time show? 135 00:06:40,040 --> 00:06:44,120 Speaker 2: What is the basis for this being categorized as a 136 00:06:44,160 --> 00:06:48,160 Speaker 2: true financial instrument regulated by the CFDC, because it certainly 137 00:06:48,240 --> 00:06:49,279 Speaker 2: just feels like prop betting. 138 00:06:49,560 --> 00:06:52,719 Speaker 3: Who has economic exposure they need to hedge to cardi 139 00:06:52,760 --> 00:06:53,599 Speaker 3: b performing. 140 00:06:53,880 --> 00:06:58,160 Speaker 5: There's a really interesting historical story around the definition of 141 00:06:58,200 --> 00:07:02,200 Speaker 5: commodity and the markets that we regulate today, starting back 142 00:07:02,400 --> 00:07:06,480 Speaker 5: in the thirties when the Commodity Exchange Act was first ratified. 143 00:07:06,640 --> 00:07:09,720 Speaker 5: It was originally focused on grain, and over time we've 144 00:07:09,760 --> 00:07:10,320 Speaker 5: had things. 145 00:07:10,160 --> 00:07:13,040 Speaker 4: Like work values exactly. It's come a very long way. 146 00:07:13,040 --> 00:07:16,280 Speaker 5: Of course, with the financial crisis, we got all manner 147 00:07:16,440 --> 00:07:18,960 Speaker 5: of new products within our authority. But the definition of 148 00:07:18,960 --> 00:07:22,080 Speaker 5: commodity is extraordinarily brought. It includes virtually everything except a 149 00:07:22,080 --> 00:07:24,840 Speaker 5: few things have been carved out onions and motion picture 150 00:07:24,880 --> 00:07:27,800 Speaker 5: box office receiscent, and that's a really important point to 151 00:07:27,840 --> 00:07:31,080 Speaker 5: note that they were expressly carved out. So most things 152 00:07:31,200 --> 00:07:35,760 Speaker 5: in our commerce today, even securities, are technically considered commodities 153 00:07:35,800 --> 00:07:38,080 Speaker 5: under our act, and we have authority to regulate them. 154 00:07:38,240 --> 00:07:40,480 Speaker 5: In the case of securities, we coordinate with the sec 155 00:07:40,560 --> 00:07:43,080 Speaker 5: and have some joint authority. But for all other types 156 00:07:43,120 --> 00:07:45,480 Speaker 5: of products services rights. 157 00:07:45,600 --> 00:07:48,280 Speaker 4: In disease, people are going to hedge that risk. 158 00:07:48,320 --> 00:07:50,000 Speaker 5: They're going to be in the market to speculate on 159 00:07:50,040 --> 00:07:53,320 Speaker 5: those products, and so we don't merit regulate. We don't 160 00:07:53,360 --> 00:07:56,120 Speaker 5: tell people what they should be entering into contracts on. 161 00:07:56,480 --> 00:07:59,200 Speaker 5: We create rules and regulations around those markets to make 162 00:07:59,200 --> 00:08:02,200 Speaker 5: sure that they have integ that they're resilient, that they're vibrant, 163 00:08:02,280 --> 00:08:04,760 Speaker 5: and they have guardrails and in vexter protections. And so 164 00:08:04,800 --> 00:08:06,920 Speaker 5: that's why going back to the exchange rule books and 165 00:08:06,960 --> 00:08:10,920 Speaker 5: other control self certification being an important process. We're making 166 00:08:10,920 --> 00:08:13,160 Speaker 5: sure that those markets are safe and secure. But we're 167 00:08:13,160 --> 00:08:16,840 Speaker 5: not telling people whether to trade pork bellies or cardib 168 00:08:17,000 --> 00:08:18,360 Speaker 5: contracts or anything else. 169 00:08:19,360 --> 00:08:22,240 Speaker 3: So let's go to the insider trading question, because this 170 00:08:22,320 --> 00:08:24,280 Speaker 3: is sort of top of mind for a lot of people. 171 00:08:24,440 --> 00:08:27,840 Speaker 3: Technically it's not insider trading, but you know, it does 172 00:08:27,920 --> 00:08:30,600 Speaker 3: look like some people have inside knowledge sometimes when they 173 00:08:30,600 --> 00:08:34,040 Speaker 3: put on big bets on something that just happens to 174 00:08:34,160 --> 00:08:38,480 Speaker 3: happen the next day. The CFTC hasn't, as far as 175 00:08:38,520 --> 00:08:41,760 Speaker 3: I know, given a lot of guidance on this issue. 176 00:08:41,840 --> 00:08:43,360 Speaker 3: How are you actually thinking about it? 177 00:08:43,640 --> 00:08:46,319 Speaker 5: Well, from a legal standpoint, I think there's a bit 178 00:08:46,360 --> 00:08:49,760 Speaker 5: of a misunderstanding about the insider trading doctrine at the CFTC. 179 00:08:50,040 --> 00:08:52,480 Speaker 5: So the authority at the agency is very similar to 180 00:08:52,520 --> 00:08:56,360 Speaker 5: the authority at the SEC Under our Anti Fraudience Manipulation Rule, 181 00:08:56,600 --> 00:08:59,080 Speaker 5: we do have authority to police insider trading in the 182 00:08:59,080 --> 00:09:02,439 Speaker 5: commodities markets. Now, the way that insider trading is carried 183 00:09:02,520 --> 00:09:05,600 Speaker 5: out is oftentimes different from a situation where you have 184 00:09:05,640 --> 00:09:09,280 Speaker 5: informational asymmetries relevant to a company. But there are situations 185 00:09:09,280 --> 00:09:12,560 Speaker 5: where you have informational asymmetries related to the markets, placing 186 00:09:12,559 --> 00:09:15,480 Speaker 5: a trade ahead of a customer, for example, or even 187 00:09:15,520 --> 00:09:18,320 Speaker 5: in this situation now with prediction markets, and that's something 188 00:09:18,360 --> 00:09:22,160 Speaker 5: we are thinking about and certainly on the beat and exploring. 189 00:09:22,440 --> 00:09:25,440 Speaker 5: So we surveil the markets, we collect data, we have 190 00:09:25,480 --> 00:09:29,080 Speaker 5: information about. For example, you know, our players participating in 191 00:09:29,120 --> 00:09:32,800 Speaker 5: these markets are people associated with the sports leagues, etc. 192 00:09:33,360 --> 00:09:34,840 Speaker 5: And so we are a cop on the beat in 193 00:09:34,840 --> 00:09:38,000 Speaker 5: that regard. So the doctrine is not entirely different, but 194 00:09:38,000 --> 00:09:40,440 Speaker 5: there are some nuances that we're aware of and making 195 00:09:40,440 --> 00:09:41,280 Speaker 5: sure that we're policing. 196 00:09:41,280 --> 00:10:00,280 Speaker 2: For would poly Market or Kelsey in your view, be 197 00:10:00,400 --> 00:10:04,200 Speaker 2: allowed to live stream a video of a giant roulette 198 00:10:04,200 --> 00:10:07,680 Speaker 2: wheel and let people trade futures on when it lands 199 00:10:07,679 --> 00:10:08,360 Speaker 2: on red or black? 200 00:10:09,880 --> 00:10:12,640 Speaker 5: Some of these types of gaming where it's really a 201 00:10:12,640 --> 00:10:15,800 Speaker 5: game of chance and not a game of skill, there's 202 00:10:16,120 --> 00:10:18,560 Speaker 5: definitely a difference. And I think when we look at 203 00:10:18,600 --> 00:10:21,800 Speaker 5: what's a commodity, it's possible that you could construct some 204 00:10:21,840 --> 00:10:26,280 Speaker 5: sort of contract an esotera derivative, but really the underlying 205 00:10:26,320 --> 00:10:28,439 Speaker 5: and a game of skills very different. There's a clear 206 00:10:28,520 --> 00:10:31,760 Speaker 5: economic risk associated for example, at the super Bowl. 207 00:10:31,920 --> 00:10:32,880 Speaker 4: It's a good example. 208 00:10:33,240 --> 00:10:35,840 Speaker 5: There's a ton of economic activity associated with that. There's 209 00:10:35,880 --> 00:10:39,800 Speaker 5: hotel revenue that comes from it, there's vendors, there's activity 210 00:10:39,800 --> 00:10:42,800 Speaker 5: within the city, tourism, all of that, and so there's 211 00:10:42,840 --> 00:10:45,160 Speaker 5: a real reason to hedge that risk. With a game 212 00:10:45,200 --> 00:10:48,080 Speaker 5: of chance, it's harder to say it's possible you can 213 00:10:48,160 --> 00:10:51,360 Speaker 5: construct something, but it's less likely that that's a real underlying. 214 00:10:51,440 --> 00:10:53,600 Speaker 2: Well, like what is like the difference because you know, 215 00:10:53,840 --> 00:10:56,760 Speaker 2: let's say it's what is bad Bunny's first song going 216 00:10:56,800 --> 00:10:59,439 Speaker 2: to be at the super Bowl? Like, what is the 217 00:10:59,480 --> 00:11:02,880 Speaker 2: difference between that, which doesn't really seem any more economic 218 00:11:03,120 --> 00:11:05,640 Speaker 2: than reultwel and whatever it is? 219 00:11:05,840 --> 00:11:08,800 Speaker 5: Well, to be clear, there's no requirement in the act 220 00:11:08,840 --> 00:11:13,280 Speaker 5: that there has to necessarily be some merit based result 221 00:11:13,600 --> 00:11:15,720 Speaker 5: from a contract. I do think with a lot of 222 00:11:15,760 --> 00:11:19,520 Speaker 5: these information markets, these prediction markets, where they're forecasting a 223 00:11:19,559 --> 00:11:22,640 Speaker 5: potential outcome in the future, they produce a lot of 224 00:11:22,760 --> 00:11:26,560 Speaker 5: useful information. We are seeing newsrooms incorporate prediction markets, We're 225 00:11:26,559 --> 00:11:30,480 Speaker 5: seeing sports live broadcasts incorporate prediction markets. We're seeing the 226 00:11:30,520 --> 00:11:33,840 Speaker 5: information use in particular. A great example is the election 227 00:11:33,920 --> 00:11:36,520 Speaker 5: in twenty twenty four were the president had a very 228 00:11:36,600 --> 00:11:39,720 Speaker 5: large victory and that was not necessarily forecast in many 229 00:11:39,720 --> 00:11:41,840 Speaker 5: of the polls, but of course the prediction markets got 230 00:11:41,920 --> 00:11:44,360 Speaker 5: that right. So it's something that I think is valuable 231 00:11:44,400 --> 00:11:47,960 Speaker 5: to society. The question of having regulation around that's a 232 00:11:47,960 --> 00:11:48,600 Speaker 5: separate question. 233 00:11:48,640 --> 00:11:49,760 Speaker 4: I think that's an important one. 234 00:11:49,800 --> 00:11:52,319 Speaker 5: We are certainly taking on that task and making sure 235 00:11:52,640 --> 00:11:54,920 Speaker 5: that we don't let these markets languish or that we 236 00:11:54,960 --> 00:11:57,839 Speaker 5: don't push them offshore, but we develop the right rules 237 00:11:57,840 --> 00:12:01,120 Speaker 5: and regulations to develop investments and make sure that the 238 00:12:01,160 --> 00:12:03,440 Speaker 5: markets are flourishing here in the United States. 239 00:12:04,000 --> 00:12:06,880 Speaker 3: Since we're discussing prediction markets through the medium of the 240 00:12:06,920 --> 00:12:10,320 Speaker 3: Super Bowl, and you mentioned players as well, looking at 241 00:12:10,480 --> 00:12:14,640 Speaker 3: player behavior, if a player were to place a bet 242 00:12:14,960 --> 00:12:18,040 Speaker 3: on I don't know, a specific play during the game, 243 00:12:18,200 --> 00:12:20,719 Speaker 3: and then they did it themselves like something that they 244 00:12:20,760 --> 00:12:24,439 Speaker 3: actually have agency over. Would that be something that you 245 00:12:24,520 --> 00:12:26,800 Speaker 3: would investigate or look into. 246 00:12:26,679 --> 00:12:28,560 Speaker 5: You know, I think it's all facts and circumstances, So 247 00:12:28,600 --> 00:12:32,559 Speaker 5: we ne'd evaluate potentially to the extent that there's insiders 248 00:12:32,559 --> 00:12:35,160 Speaker 5: that are involved in the markets, we get that data. 249 00:12:35,160 --> 00:12:37,280 Speaker 5: We're actually talking to a lot of the sports leagues. 250 00:12:37,280 --> 00:12:39,640 Speaker 5: We're talking to participants in the markets to make sure 251 00:12:39,679 --> 00:12:42,040 Speaker 5: that we are on top of things, have information about 252 00:12:42,080 --> 00:12:44,480 Speaker 5: who is able to be participating in these markets who's not. 253 00:12:45,040 --> 00:12:47,240 Speaker 4: We do have at the exchange level. 254 00:12:47,400 --> 00:12:49,760 Speaker 5: The exchanges are really the first line of defense, and 255 00:12:49,840 --> 00:12:53,640 Speaker 5: they're surveilling the markets, they're doing KYC on their customers, 256 00:12:53,880 --> 00:12:55,800 Speaker 5: and so that's certainly something we're on top of and 257 00:12:55,840 --> 00:12:58,559 Speaker 5: we'd consider and evaluate on a case by case basis. 258 00:12:59,200 --> 00:13:03,320 Speaker 2: Why isn't a trading sports derivatives gambling or betting or 259 00:13:03,400 --> 00:13:03,920 Speaker 2: is it betting? 260 00:13:04,000 --> 00:13:06,520 Speaker 4: Well, there really is an interesting history here. 261 00:13:06,520 --> 00:13:11,439 Speaker 5: So if you go back to the thirties, national grain 262 00:13:11,520 --> 00:13:13,599 Speaker 5: betting was a thing, right, and that was considered a 263 00:13:13,679 --> 00:13:17,160 Speaker 5: national pastime. And so for as long as we've had 264 00:13:17,200 --> 00:13:19,880 Speaker 5: derivatives markets, we've had these so called bucket shops which 265 00:13:19,880 --> 00:13:23,280 Speaker 5: were you know, these these off exchange markets where people 266 00:13:23,320 --> 00:13:26,040 Speaker 5: were just placing bets against the house on the future 267 00:13:26,120 --> 00:13:27,120 Speaker 5: price of a commodity. 268 00:13:27,480 --> 00:13:29,679 Speaker 4: On the other hand, you had organized exchanges. 269 00:13:29,679 --> 00:13:32,720 Speaker 5: So the Chicago Board of Trade later CME and others 270 00:13:33,000 --> 00:13:36,360 Speaker 5: had organized markets with market integrity. They had derivative instruments 271 00:13:36,440 --> 00:13:40,520 Speaker 5: contracts where you actually were in a contract with another person. 272 00:13:40,640 --> 00:13:42,959 Speaker 5: And then now in our markets, we have a clearinghouse 273 00:13:43,080 --> 00:13:45,560 Speaker 5: novating and standing in the middle of those contracts. But 274 00:13:45,640 --> 00:13:47,719 Speaker 5: you have a buyer for every seller. With the kind 275 00:13:47,720 --> 00:13:50,320 Speaker 5: of booky model, that's not the case. You're betting against 276 00:13:50,320 --> 00:13:53,040 Speaker 5: the house, and there's a lot of different rules. When 277 00:13:53,040 --> 00:13:54,880 Speaker 5: you're betting against the house. You don't have the liquidity 278 00:13:54,920 --> 00:13:57,320 Speaker 5: of being able to offset your position or sell out 279 00:13:57,360 --> 00:14:00,240 Speaker 5: of your position. You're kind of stuck taking for the 280 00:14:00,280 --> 00:14:02,520 Speaker 5: bookie's giving you, and some of the odds are very different, 281 00:14:02,559 --> 00:14:04,840 Speaker 5: so you're actually facing the odds of the bookie as 282 00:14:04,880 --> 00:14:07,320 Speaker 5: opposed to hear where the contracts go up and down 283 00:14:07,320 --> 00:14:11,240 Speaker 5: a value based on actual market activity. And so over time, 284 00:14:11,440 --> 00:14:14,440 Speaker 5: the Supreme Court actually blocked some of this bucket shop 285 00:14:14,480 --> 00:14:17,200 Speaker 5: activity by saying you can't take the price quotations from 286 00:14:17,360 --> 00:14:19,600 Speaker 5: the organized exchanges and use them in a bucket shop, 287 00:14:20,240 --> 00:14:21,880 Speaker 5: but a lot of these bucket shops over the years 288 00:14:21,840 --> 00:14:24,640 Speaker 5: have now moved into gaming and other things. We're seeing 289 00:14:24,680 --> 00:14:28,200 Speaker 5: really the same phenomenon where we have casinos and other 290 00:14:28,240 --> 00:14:33,040 Speaker 5: operations that are operating lawfully under state requirements and regulations, 291 00:14:33,200 --> 00:14:35,080 Speaker 5: but they don't have the same sorts of controls. You know, 292 00:14:35,080 --> 00:14:38,720 Speaker 5: we regulate a nearly five hundred trillion notional market with 293 00:14:38,760 --> 00:14:41,960 Speaker 5: the swaps market. We have very stringent requirements and controls 294 00:14:42,000 --> 00:14:45,560 Speaker 5: around our exchanges, and these contracts reflect that. They go 295 00:14:45,640 --> 00:14:49,360 Speaker 5: through a very stringent process of self certification. They can't 296 00:14:49,360 --> 00:14:52,640 Speaker 5: be readily susceptible to manipulation. We survey those markets, we've 297 00:14:52,640 --> 00:14:55,120 Speaker 5: policed things like insider trading, and so it's a much 298 00:14:55,120 --> 00:14:57,880 Speaker 5: more robust scheme on top of these markets, much higher 299 00:14:57,880 --> 00:15:00,720 Speaker 5: stringent requirements, and so I I do think we're seeing 300 00:15:00,720 --> 00:15:04,040 Speaker 5: a lot of parallels between the thirties and forties and today. 301 00:15:04,400 --> 00:15:06,400 Speaker 5: But rest assure that we're on top of these markets 302 00:15:06,520 --> 00:15:09,120 Speaker 5: and these have the same sorts of investor protections that 303 00:15:09,120 --> 00:15:11,680 Speaker 5: you would expect in the securities markets and in our 304 00:15:11,680 --> 00:15:12,600 Speaker 5: futures markets. 305 00:15:13,280 --> 00:15:16,280 Speaker 3: Out of curiosity, how much of your time is split 306 00:15:16,400 --> 00:15:20,440 Speaker 3: now between the new stuff, prediction markets crypto versus the 307 00:15:20,840 --> 00:15:23,160 Speaker 3: I guess, the old boring futures exchanges. 308 00:15:23,360 --> 00:15:26,080 Speaker 5: Yeah, oh five, Well, our day to day is really 309 00:15:26,120 --> 00:15:28,840 Speaker 5: the traditional markets. So and when we talk about these 310 00:15:28,880 --> 00:15:31,560 Speaker 5: new markets, many of the incumbents are getting into this 311 00:15:31,600 --> 00:15:33,760 Speaker 5: space as well. We're seeing more and more of these 312 00:15:33,760 --> 00:15:37,080 Speaker 5: products offered on our traditional dcms, But all of these 313 00:15:37,080 --> 00:15:40,440 Speaker 5: are the same registration category, right. There are some nuances 314 00:15:40,440 --> 00:15:42,520 Speaker 5: and how they're set up. There's some new action relief 315 00:15:42,560 --> 00:15:45,680 Speaker 5: that's been given to some of these platforms historically, but 316 00:15:45,840 --> 00:15:48,240 Speaker 5: this is not it's not, you know, our day to 317 00:15:48,320 --> 00:15:52,600 Speaker 5: day bulk of work. That said, given that it's new, 318 00:15:52,640 --> 00:15:55,120 Speaker 5: and given that there's so much that is changing, we 319 00:15:55,240 --> 00:15:58,240 Speaker 5: have a lot more rulemaking and policy work to do 320 00:15:58,280 --> 00:16:00,680 Speaker 5: in this space. So I do think it's a big 321 00:16:00,760 --> 00:16:03,920 Speaker 5: piece because of that. But in terms of the actual 322 00:16:04,360 --> 00:16:07,080 Speaker 5: size of these markets compared to our as I said, 323 00:16:07,160 --> 00:16:11,400 Speaker 5: about five hundred trillion dollar notional swaps market forty trillion 324 00:16:11,480 --> 00:16:15,960 Speaker 5: dollar notional futures markets, it's a smaller piece, but it's growing, 325 00:16:16,080 --> 00:16:18,280 Speaker 5: and I think blockchain is going to really change, in 326 00:16:18,320 --> 00:16:22,400 Speaker 5: particular how some of these existing exchanges operate, how they 327 00:16:22,440 --> 00:16:25,360 Speaker 5: settle transactions and so forth, and so it's a really 328 00:16:25,360 --> 00:16:26,800 Speaker 5: exciting time to be in the seat. 329 00:16:27,080 --> 00:16:30,400 Speaker 2: So I get that there are some market structure differences 330 00:16:30,520 --> 00:16:35,320 Speaker 2: between a futures exchange on sports versus the traditional house 331 00:16:35,360 --> 00:16:38,560 Speaker 2: sets the odds and so forth, But from the perspective 332 00:16:38,840 --> 00:16:42,360 Speaker 2: of the user or the person who's putting money on 333 00:16:42,400 --> 00:16:45,720 Speaker 2: the line, like I think most people would say, like economically, 334 00:16:46,280 --> 00:16:48,560 Speaker 2: they're very similar, and they're getting more similar because we 335 00:16:48,640 --> 00:16:50,880 Speaker 2: know that to say, like the Kelshie and poly market 336 00:16:51,080 --> 00:16:53,800 Speaker 2: they're trying to get into to do parlays and stuff, 337 00:16:53,840 --> 00:16:57,480 Speaker 2: so like it's getting closer and closer. And you know, 338 00:16:57,520 --> 00:17:00,160 Speaker 2: people have a lot of concerns about sports gambling, the 339 00:17:00,160 --> 00:17:03,000 Speaker 2: effect that that has on young people and so forth. 340 00:17:03,280 --> 00:17:06,679 Speaker 2: National legalization of these it defecta lowers the age in 341 00:17:06,720 --> 00:17:08,920 Speaker 2: a lot of states because in a lot of states 342 00:17:08,960 --> 00:17:11,760 Speaker 2: the legal age to gamble is twenty one and the 343 00:17:11,840 --> 00:17:14,040 Speaker 2: legal age to trade a future is like eighteen. I 344 00:17:14,080 --> 00:17:17,399 Speaker 2: believe do you think that's good that we've defacto lowered 345 00:17:17,400 --> 00:17:18,560 Speaker 2: the age to bet on sports. 346 00:17:19,200 --> 00:17:21,240 Speaker 4: Well, again, we're not merit regulators. 347 00:17:21,480 --> 00:17:23,440 Speaker 5: We don't pass judgment on kind of the age requirements 348 00:17:23,440 --> 00:17:25,879 Speaker 5: in our securities markets and our derivatives' markets. We have 349 00:17:25,920 --> 00:17:30,160 Speaker 5: certain standards that have been upheld these markets. People are 350 00:17:30,200 --> 00:17:33,080 Speaker 5: betting on any number of assets, right if. 351 00:17:33,040 --> 00:17:35,040 Speaker 2: You want to call it these overwhelmingly sports. 352 00:17:35,960 --> 00:17:38,359 Speaker 5: I mean I think that said you have the ability 353 00:17:38,400 --> 00:17:41,640 Speaker 5: to make investments and trade options all manner of securities, 354 00:17:41,680 --> 00:17:44,040 Speaker 5: all manner of commodities, and so the rules are not 355 00:17:44,160 --> 00:17:47,440 Speaker 5: different based on being sports or this or that. I 356 00:17:47,480 --> 00:17:49,879 Speaker 5: think this term betting has been used and thrown about 357 00:17:50,200 --> 00:17:52,800 Speaker 5: in our securities markets and our derivatives markets as well, 358 00:17:53,000 --> 00:17:56,040 Speaker 5: and I don't think it necessarily means anything in particular, 359 00:17:56,160 --> 00:17:59,040 Speaker 5: but the notion is that you're able to make decisions 360 00:17:59,080 --> 00:18:02,600 Speaker 5: at eighteen in our markets, and we uphold that. State 361 00:18:02,600 --> 00:18:05,520 Speaker 5: by state, some of the standards have set even higher, 362 00:18:05,640 --> 00:18:08,239 Speaker 5: and that is not something that you know, I have 363 00:18:08,280 --> 00:18:09,359 Speaker 5: a particular opinion on. 364 00:18:09,440 --> 00:18:10,600 Speaker 4: I think that's just the way. 365 00:18:10,440 --> 00:18:12,040 Speaker 2: When you say, sure, what do you mean in state 366 00:18:12,080 --> 00:18:13,560 Speaker 2: by say some of the standards. 367 00:18:13,160 --> 00:18:15,440 Speaker 5: So some of the states have flexibility and what they 368 00:18:15,520 --> 00:18:18,760 Speaker 5: set up for drinking or for you know, gambling, and 369 00:18:18,800 --> 00:18:21,200 Speaker 5: then like this is financial market activity. 370 00:18:21,240 --> 00:18:24,800 Speaker 4: These are not wagers. You're not betting against the house. 371 00:18:24,840 --> 00:18:28,840 Speaker 5: We have significant overlay from a regulatory standpoint over these markets, 372 00:18:28,840 --> 00:18:33,200 Speaker 5: and so we're not gatekeeping particular categories of markets, elections 373 00:18:33,280 --> 00:18:35,840 Speaker 5: or sports and having different standards. That's not how we've 374 00:18:35,840 --> 00:18:38,199 Speaker 5: typically done things, and so we don't intend to do 375 00:18:38,240 --> 00:18:39,679 Speaker 5: that in this particular market. 376 00:18:40,119 --> 00:18:43,080 Speaker 3: So you're not a merit based regulator, but you are 377 00:18:43,119 --> 00:18:46,440 Speaker 3: a technical regulator. And as we've been discussing, there's a 378 00:18:46,480 --> 00:18:49,280 Speaker 3: lot going on, lots of rulemaking to do, lots of 379 00:18:49,280 --> 00:18:54,280 Speaker 3: potential enforcement actions. There's a barren story out today talking 380 00:18:54,280 --> 00:18:59,080 Speaker 3: about how the CFTC apparently has no enforcement officers left 381 00:18:59,119 --> 00:19:02,479 Speaker 3: in its Chicago office, and you used to have twenty, 382 00:19:02,600 --> 00:19:07,640 Speaker 3: but everyone resigned. It seems. How are you balancing all 383 00:19:07,760 --> 00:19:11,040 Speaker 3: these new markets which are growing really really fast and 384 00:19:11,160 --> 00:19:15,359 Speaker 3: pose some very thorny questions that we've been discussing with 385 00:19:15,840 --> 00:19:17,119 Speaker 3: more limited resources. 386 00:19:17,480 --> 00:19:20,000 Speaker 5: Well, look, a lot of the folks that left that 387 00:19:20,119 --> 00:19:23,720 Speaker 5: was before my tenure, and certainly you know it's not 388 00:19:24,359 --> 00:19:26,160 Speaker 5: you know, they didn't leave it right after I joined, right, 389 00:19:26,960 --> 00:19:29,000 Speaker 5: But no, I think that it's a serious question. Right, 390 00:19:29,040 --> 00:19:30,880 Speaker 5: We've got to make sure that we have adequate staff 391 00:19:31,000 --> 00:19:33,520 Speaker 5: to police the markets, and we do have a ton 392 00:19:33,520 --> 00:19:36,280 Speaker 5: of staff throughout the country, and you know, to the 393 00:19:36,280 --> 00:19:38,679 Speaker 5: point of our Chicago office, of course, it's important that 394 00:19:38,720 --> 00:19:41,159 Speaker 5: we have folks within that office, but we don't have 395 00:19:41,160 --> 00:19:43,359 Speaker 5: a Texas office, we don't have a Florida office, we 396 00:19:43,359 --> 00:19:44,640 Speaker 5: don't have offices in every state. 397 00:19:44,640 --> 00:19:46,040 Speaker 4: We have a handful of offices. 398 00:19:46,160 --> 00:19:48,880 Speaker 5: We've got a critical mass in DC and a number 399 00:19:48,880 --> 00:19:51,000 Speaker 5: of folks in New York as well, and those are 400 00:19:51,160 --> 00:19:54,800 Speaker 5: two largest offices. We continue to fill those out, and 401 00:19:55,280 --> 00:19:58,000 Speaker 5: we would love to have more people in Chicago, and 402 00:19:58,440 --> 00:20:00,080 Speaker 5: you know, the door is always open for folks that 403 00:20:00,080 --> 00:20:01,560 Speaker 5: want to come in and work for us, and we 404 00:20:01,600 --> 00:20:03,360 Speaker 5: continue to build out the ranks there. 405 00:20:03,400 --> 00:20:04,919 Speaker 4: But we have adequate resources. 406 00:20:04,960 --> 00:20:07,320 Speaker 5: We have a ton of folks within each of our offices, 407 00:20:07,359 --> 00:20:10,359 Speaker 5: and we're actually leveraging a lot of the new technologies 408 00:20:10,359 --> 00:20:12,600 Speaker 5: like AI to make sure that we're surveilling the markets 409 00:20:12,880 --> 00:20:16,040 Speaker 5: and that we're reviewing things like can started trading and 410 00:20:16,080 --> 00:20:19,439 Speaker 5: bringing cases where it makes sense. We're also processing applications 411 00:20:19,480 --> 00:20:21,720 Speaker 5: very quickly. We just processed, I think in a record 412 00:20:21,760 --> 00:20:24,399 Speaker 5: time of two hundred days one of the more recent 413 00:20:24,520 --> 00:20:25,640 Speaker 5: exchange applications. 414 00:20:25,640 --> 00:20:27,320 Speaker 4: So we're really well staffed. 415 00:20:27,320 --> 00:20:29,080 Speaker 5: But we're continuing to build that out and make sure 416 00:20:29,119 --> 00:20:31,080 Speaker 5: that we have good people in the building who are 417 00:20:31,320 --> 00:20:32,040 Speaker 5: competent and. 418 00:20:32,040 --> 00:20:34,720 Speaker 4: Able to make sure that we protect our markets. 419 00:20:34,960 --> 00:20:38,600 Speaker 2: So you have the funding to add headcount, and are 420 00:20:38,600 --> 00:20:41,480 Speaker 2: you pursuing like building out the headcount. Do you need 421 00:20:41,480 --> 00:20:42,000 Speaker 2: more funding? 422 00:20:42,200 --> 00:20:45,399 Speaker 5: Absolutely, so we are actually staffing up, so one hundred 423 00:20:45,400 --> 00:20:48,919 Speaker 5: percent we're building that out. We have adequate resources to 424 00:20:48,960 --> 00:20:50,719 Speaker 5: do so. But I want to be clear that we 425 00:20:50,800 --> 00:20:54,000 Speaker 5: have a very well staffed building and we're very much 426 00:20:54,040 --> 00:20:56,359 Speaker 5: on top of things with and you know, these questions 427 00:20:56,400 --> 00:20:59,160 Speaker 5: are out not enforcing and surveilling. You know, I think 428 00:20:59,160 --> 00:21:00,800 Speaker 5: there's a little bit of face news there. We probably 429 00:21:00,800 --> 00:21:02,879 Speaker 5: should put it up to a prediction market. But I 430 00:21:02,920 --> 00:21:04,280 Speaker 5: do think that we're on top of things. 431 00:21:05,160 --> 00:21:08,080 Speaker 3: So one thing I know about the Trump administration, they 432 00:21:08,080 --> 00:21:13,200 Speaker 3: are big fans, seemingly of cutting costs, cutting spending, streamlining 433 00:21:13,280 --> 00:21:16,560 Speaker 3: the federal government in some ways, and you know, sometimes 434 00:21:16,600 --> 00:21:20,080 Speaker 3: cutting agencies altogether. This has been a really long running 435 00:21:20,160 --> 00:21:25,000 Speaker 3: question in market structure world. But why don't we just 436 00:21:25,040 --> 00:21:27,040 Speaker 3: combine the CFTC SEC. 437 00:21:27,600 --> 00:21:29,200 Speaker 4: It's everybody's favorite question. Yeah. 438 00:21:29,240 --> 00:21:32,240 Speaker 5: Look, the CFTC and SEC are very different regulators. So 439 00:21:32,280 --> 00:21:35,760 Speaker 5: the SEC is a capital markets regulator. They're focused on 440 00:21:36,040 --> 00:21:39,119 Speaker 5: somebody wants to go race capital for a great idea. 441 00:21:39,240 --> 00:21:41,680 Speaker 5: Other people want to place that capital somewhere there needs 442 00:21:41,720 --> 00:21:44,280 Speaker 5: to be some regulation over that. After the Great Depression, 443 00:21:44,320 --> 00:21:46,520 Speaker 5: there was a lot of chaos in the markets, and 444 00:21:46,720 --> 00:21:50,639 Speaker 5: the agency really was a great answer to that issue 445 00:21:50,800 --> 00:21:53,640 Speaker 5: and has put a great regime in place to regulate 446 00:21:53,680 --> 00:21:56,480 Speaker 5: all of that. The CFTC grew up actually at a 447 00:21:56,560 --> 00:21:59,280 Speaker 5: different time. The original act was in the thirties, but 448 00:21:59,400 --> 00:22:01,880 Speaker 5: later on and the safetc Was established in the seventies. 449 00:22:02,040 --> 00:22:06,000 Speaker 5: But the purpose of the CFDC is to regulate risk mitigation, 450 00:22:06,200 --> 00:22:09,720 Speaker 5: risk management very different areas. So there are firms that 451 00:22:10,040 --> 00:22:14,000 Speaker 5: whether farmers, ranchers, energy producers. Now we have data centers 452 00:22:14,440 --> 00:22:17,320 Speaker 5: in the AI space, but all manner of businesses have 453 00:22:17,400 --> 00:22:19,439 Speaker 5: a bunch of risk related to the inputs for their 454 00:22:19,480 --> 00:22:23,359 Speaker 5: business and ongoing operations and they need to hedge that risk. 455 00:22:23,440 --> 00:22:26,320 Speaker 5: And there are other praditions that want to supply liquidity 456 00:22:26,359 --> 00:22:30,160 Speaker 5: into those markets, make markets, or speculate, and the CFTC 457 00:22:30,440 --> 00:22:33,400 Speaker 5: regulates that. So very different purpose for the regulator. There's 458 00:22:33,400 --> 00:22:35,720 Speaker 5: not the same sort of disclosure regime that we have 459 00:22:35,800 --> 00:22:37,879 Speaker 5: with the SEC, and so it makes sense to have 460 00:22:37,960 --> 00:22:40,840 Speaker 5: two separate regulators. But what doesn't make sense and what 461 00:22:40,920 --> 00:22:43,320 Speaker 5: Chairman Akins and I have been very clear on is 462 00:22:43,359 --> 00:22:46,520 Speaker 5: the lack of coordination between the agency. So it's coordination, 463 00:22:46,920 --> 00:22:51,560 Speaker 5: not consolidation. We need to harmonize the two regimes to 464 00:22:51,680 --> 00:22:55,800 Speaker 5: make sure that there's not inconsistent and incompatible rules and 465 00:22:55,840 --> 00:22:58,520 Speaker 5: that there's not gaps. So Chairman Akins is referred to 466 00:22:58,560 --> 00:23:02,120 Speaker 5: this no man's land between the two agencies where you've 467 00:23:02,119 --> 00:23:05,280 Speaker 5: got the bodies of all these dead products and services 468 00:23:05,320 --> 00:23:07,720 Speaker 5: that otherwise could have been if the agencies could just 469 00:23:07,720 --> 00:23:11,000 Speaker 5: figure out how to coordinate. Security futures is a great example. 470 00:23:11,280 --> 00:23:14,280 Speaker 5: We have shared jurisdiction there, but we've really failed to 471 00:23:14,359 --> 00:23:15,120 Speaker 5: work well. 472 00:23:14,920 --> 00:23:16,480 Speaker 4: Together to get that off the ground. 473 00:23:16,880 --> 00:23:18,439 Speaker 5: And so I think it's really a new day at 474 00:23:18,480 --> 00:23:21,479 Speaker 5: both agencies where we're intending to work closely together on that. 475 00:23:21,880 --> 00:23:23,959 Speaker 3: Yeah, this is exactly what I wanted to ask. So 476 00:23:24,560 --> 00:23:28,280 Speaker 3: I've heard people talk about increased cooperation and coordination between 477 00:23:28,280 --> 00:23:32,600 Speaker 3: the SEC and the CFTC basically ever since the financial crisis, 478 00:23:33,040 --> 00:23:36,359 Speaker 3: and it hasn't really happened, or it hasn't happened to 479 00:23:36,400 --> 00:23:39,399 Speaker 3: the degree that some people would like to see, what's 480 00:23:39,440 --> 00:23:43,560 Speaker 3: your diagnosis of the actual problem there? And I would 481 00:23:43,600 --> 00:23:46,239 Speaker 3: love to get into the weeds here, and you know, like, 482 00:23:46,400 --> 00:23:49,600 Speaker 3: what does coordination look like between the two agencies. 483 00:23:50,200 --> 00:23:52,240 Speaker 5: Yeah, I mean, I'm in a good position that I 484 00:23:52,320 --> 00:23:55,000 Speaker 5: used to work for Tairman Akins, But you know, so 485 00:23:55,040 --> 00:23:56,840 Speaker 5: I think we have a great relationship just getting off 486 00:23:56,840 --> 00:24:00,359 Speaker 5: for the start. But a memorandum of understanding is something 487 00:24:00,400 --> 00:24:03,160 Speaker 5: that we've committed to execute and we're looking to ext 488 00:24:03,240 --> 00:24:05,520 Speaker 5: you very soon, and that really set all the ground 489 00:24:05,640 --> 00:24:08,800 Speaker 5: rules for coordination between the staffs, and so not having 490 00:24:08,840 --> 00:24:12,000 Speaker 5: that in place, I think is really hampered the two agencies. 491 00:24:12,080 --> 00:24:15,200 Speaker 5: Because sharing information is really important. You need a framework 492 00:24:15,200 --> 00:24:17,840 Speaker 5: for sharing that information. There's a lot of non public 493 00:24:18,200 --> 00:24:21,440 Speaker 5: material that has generated in each building and so having 494 00:24:21,520 --> 00:24:24,359 Speaker 5: rules for the sharing of that information is important. Having 495 00:24:24,400 --> 00:24:27,719 Speaker 5: regular meetings between the staffs and coordination and sharing of 496 00:24:28,080 --> 00:24:31,600 Speaker 5: market data related to registrants is really important. So if 497 00:24:31,600 --> 00:24:34,840 Speaker 5: we've got dual registrants and we're collecting our own sets 498 00:24:34,880 --> 00:24:37,879 Speaker 5: of information and we're ensuring that they're each complying with 499 00:24:38,160 --> 00:24:41,399 Speaker 5: these two kind of separate fortresses of rules and regulations, 500 00:24:41,920 --> 00:24:44,200 Speaker 5: how do we know who's doing what and what needs 501 00:24:44,200 --> 00:24:46,800 Speaker 5: to be changed, And so having the information is really important. 502 00:24:46,800 --> 00:24:49,040 Speaker 5: That's the first step, and then the staffs need to 503 00:24:49,080 --> 00:24:52,480 Speaker 5: come together and figure out how to create substitute compliance. 504 00:24:52,800 --> 00:24:56,239 Speaker 5: So certain rules are incompatible on both sides, we need 505 00:24:56,280 --> 00:24:58,200 Speaker 5: to knock those out, or at least have a kind 506 00:24:58,200 --> 00:25:01,640 Speaker 5: of default choice one agency versus the other. If you're 507 00:25:01,640 --> 00:25:04,600 Speaker 5: a broker dealer and you're doing a very minimal amount 508 00:25:04,680 --> 00:25:07,919 Speaker 5: of commodity derivatives activity, perhaps you should have a primary 509 00:25:07,960 --> 00:25:11,399 Speaker 5: regulator at the SEC with some CFTC overlay to make 510 00:25:11,440 --> 00:25:12,880 Speaker 5: sure that there's no gaps. 511 00:25:13,240 --> 00:25:14,520 Speaker 4: So that that's an important piece. 512 00:25:14,800 --> 00:25:19,680 Speaker 5: I think a lot of the general crypto related issues 513 00:25:20,040 --> 00:25:25,320 Speaker 5: are really calling for joint rulemaking, joint work between the agencies, 514 00:25:25,400 --> 00:25:29,800 Speaker 5: because we're seeing Nvidia tokens on chain and not necessarily 515 00:25:29,800 --> 00:25:31,720 Speaker 5: within the US, but I think now with the DTC, 516 00:25:31,840 --> 00:25:33,679 Speaker 5: we're going to start seeing a lot more of the 517 00:25:33,720 --> 00:25:38,119 Speaker 5: tokenization of public equities, and then we're also seeing pitcoin 518 00:25:38,320 --> 00:25:42,440 Speaker 5: ether things that are within our territory trading on chain, 519 00:25:42,760 --> 00:25:44,520 Speaker 5: and those worlds are going to collide, and then they 520 00:25:44,520 --> 00:25:48,000 Speaker 5: are in fact colliding today, and so having common ground 521 00:25:48,080 --> 00:25:50,840 Speaker 5: between the agencies, figuring out what the ground rules are 522 00:25:51,560 --> 00:25:54,399 Speaker 5: and making sure that we have similar standards for decentralized 523 00:25:54,440 --> 00:25:56,800 Speaker 5: finance and for digital wallets and all of that's really 524 00:25:56,800 --> 00:26:00,719 Speaker 5: important because if we set incompatible standards, then it's going 525 00:26:00,800 --> 00:26:02,840 Speaker 5: to be a real disservice to the market, and that's 526 00:26:02,840 --> 00:26:04,440 Speaker 5: going to harm all Americans. 527 00:26:05,240 --> 00:26:05,480 Speaker 4: Kels. 528 00:26:05,480 --> 00:26:08,679 Speaker 2: She had an ad recently. It said pov is a girl, 529 00:26:08,840 --> 00:26:10,879 Speaker 2: and it said Puovy. I was about to be unable 530 00:26:10,920 --> 00:26:12,960 Speaker 2: to pay my rent, but I got two years of 531 00:26:13,040 --> 00:26:17,879 Speaker 2: rent through Kelshie's predictions. It's amazing. This seems more aggressive 532 00:26:18,000 --> 00:26:21,480 Speaker 2: even than you know, the traditional sports betting and there's 533 00:26:21,520 --> 00:26:24,600 Speaker 2: all kinds of sports betting ads, and then they have 534 00:26:24,640 --> 00:26:27,480 Speaker 2: a thing where you're a problem gambler call this number. 535 00:26:27,720 --> 00:26:31,720 Speaker 2: Should there be any limiting factor on how aggressively sports 536 00:26:31,920 --> 00:26:33,840 Speaker 2: these prediction markets should be advertised. 537 00:26:34,320 --> 00:26:37,359 Speaker 5: Well, that's one point that I think is worth double 538 00:26:37,400 --> 00:26:40,199 Speaker 5: clicking on, in the sense that there are standards for 539 00:26:40,320 --> 00:26:44,040 Speaker 5: futures commission mersions for the brokers within our markets, and 540 00:26:44,119 --> 00:26:48,359 Speaker 5: some of those standards are like essentially the way that 541 00:26:48,400 --> 00:26:53,119 Speaker 5: the Act and the regulations developed, where you have intermediation 542 00:26:53,520 --> 00:26:57,840 Speaker 5: between the customer and the clearinghouse and the exchange typically 543 00:26:57,880 --> 00:26:58,560 Speaker 5: in our markets. 544 00:26:58,640 --> 00:27:00,160 Speaker 4: Now these no Act. 545 00:27:00,320 --> 00:27:03,919 Speaker 5: Letters that started around two thousand that were given to 546 00:27:04,040 --> 00:27:07,159 Speaker 5: some of the prediction markets back then. Yeah, as well 547 00:27:07,240 --> 00:27:10,440 Speaker 5: as now other markets cut out the FCM cut out 548 00:27:10,480 --> 00:27:13,240 Speaker 5: the broker, and so you had direct to the clearing house, 549 00:27:13,280 --> 00:27:16,520 Speaker 5: direct to the exchange. And that model doesn't have all 550 00:27:16,560 --> 00:27:19,400 Speaker 5: the same rules and regulations, and so something that we're 551 00:27:19,440 --> 00:27:21,960 Speaker 5: thinking about is how do we make sure that we 552 00:27:21,960 --> 00:27:25,280 Speaker 5: have consistent standards across both. Now I think this question 553 00:27:25,320 --> 00:27:28,240 Speaker 5: of what sort of marketing and advertising either should be 554 00:27:28,280 --> 00:27:30,760 Speaker 5: able to engage in as one that we're certainly geving 555 00:27:30,800 --> 00:27:31,480 Speaker 5: to think about. 556 00:27:31,640 --> 00:27:33,919 Speaker 2: Sorry, just to be clear, there are current rules on 557 00:27:34,160 --> 00:27:37,520 Speaker 2: say a futures broker and how they can market. But 558 00:27:37,640 --> 00:27:41,240 Speaker 2: when these no action letters were established that allowed the 559 00:27:41,280 --> 00:27:44,640 Speaker 2: sort of the Future's entity itself to offer directly, they 560 00:27:44,640 --> 00:27:47,200 Speaker 2: didn't have the rules. What are the rules and wouldn't 561 00:27:47,240 --> 00:27:50,280 Speaker 2: add like these, like if a future is broker, like 562 00:27:50,400 --> 00:27:52,840 Speaker 2: I don't know, I forget MF Global or something, They're like, oh, 563 00:27:52,840 --> 00:27:56,080 Speaker 2: I couldn't pay my rent. But then now I'm you know, 564 00:27:56,200 --> 00:27:58,240 Speaker 2: now might now I'll never have to work again because 565 00:27:58,240 --> 00:28:01,199 Speaker 2: I traded whet futures. That seems a little weird and 566 00:28:01,280 --> 00:28:02,640 Speaker 2: I've never seen an ad like that. 567 00:28:02,720 --> 00:28:04,560 Speaker 5: Right, I mean, it really is this result of the 568 00:28:04,560 --> 00:28:06,919 Speaker 5: way that these no action letters were handed down, as 569 00:28:06,960 --> 00:28:09,320 Speaker 5: I said many many years ago, and this kind of 570 00:28:09,320 --> 00:28:12,560 Speaker 5: regime that we have that really my view on a 571 00:28:12,560 --> 00:28:14,240 Speaker 5: lot of this stuff is that we need clear rules 572 00:28:14,280 --> 00:28:16,160 Speaker 5: of the road. We need to do things through notice 573 00:28:16,160 --> 00:28:19,840 Speaker 5: and comment rulemaking, and actually think holistically about our markets 574 00:28:20,119 --> 00:28:22,800 Speaker 5: and not focus on these little patchwork no action letters, 575 00:28:22,800 --> 00:28:26,560 Speaker 5: which unfortunately has been the rule over many years. And 576 00:28:26,600 --> 00:28:28,639 Speaker 5: so that's definitely something we're thinking about. We want to 577 00:28:28,640 --> 00:28:31,320 Speaker 5: set clear standards. We want stakeholders out the table to 578 00:28:31,320 --> 00:28:33,680 Speaker 5: figure out what these regimes should look like. And I'm 579 00:28:33,680 --> 00:28:36,560 Speaker 5: not one necessarily to say what the marketing should look like. 580 00:28:36,600 --> 00:28:39,360 Speaker 5: We want to hear from participants as to what sort 581 00:28:39,400 --> 00:28:42,760 Speaker 5: of marketing they think's appropriate for these markets. But we're 582 00:28:42,760 --> 00:28:45,000 Speaker 5: certainly thinking about that, and there are different standards. It 583 00:28:45,040 --> 00:28:47,320 Speaker 5: really is just a result of the kind of ad 584 00:28:47,360 --> 00:28:50,640 Speaker 5: hoc way that regulators in the past have gone about 585 00:28:50,760 --> 00:28:54,160 Speaker 5: establishing exceptions for certain things in the markets. 586 00:28:54,360 --> 00:28:57,440 Speaker 3: Well, on this note, do you maybe need new classifications 587 00:28:57,440 --> 00:28:59,800 Speaker 3: because it seems like all these different worlds are kind 588 00:28:59,800 --> 00:29:02,719 Speaker 3: of melding together, where you might have a crypto trading 589 00:29:02,760 --> 00:29:07,040 Speaker 3: platform that's now offering derivatives and other things, and then 590 00:29:07,080 --> 00:29:10,280 Speaker 3: you have like an old school exchange that is offering 591 00:29:10,600 --> 00:29:14,720 Speaker 3: essentially bets like number go up, number go down. At 592 00:29:14,760 --> 00:29:18,320 Speaker 3: the moment, I think your registration categories are pretty like 593 00:29:19,200 --> 00:29:22,240 Speaker 3: standardized and you have three of them, is that right? 594 00:29:22,280 --> 00:29:25,800 Speaker 3: Like futures, exchange, swap execution stuff like that. 595 00:29:26,080 --> 00:29:28,320 Speaker 4: Oh, we've got too many, We've got many? Okay, anymore? 596 00:29:28,560 --> 00:29:29,000 Speaker 1: All right? 597 00:29:29,040 --> 00:29:31,560 Speaker 3: More than that? So could you create even more to 598 00:29:31,640 --> 00:29:35,520 Speaker 3: sort of encompass the industry changes that we're seeing. 599 00:29:35,720 --> 00:29:38,560 Speaker 5: Well, we certainly need to think holistically about what requirements 600 00:29:38,600 --> 00:29:41,840 Speaker 5: we have on different participants. So these non intermediated exchanges, 601 00:29:41,880 --> 00:29:44,000 Speaker 5: and we're also seeing a lot of vertical integration with 602 00:29:44,440 --> 00:29:48,440 Speaker 5: a single business owning a clearinghouse, an FCM, the broker, 603 00:29:48,560 --> 00:29:51,840 Speaker 5: and the exchange. We're seeing different models where there's the 604 00:29:51,920 --> 00:29:54,400 Speaker 5: non intermediated As I said, we don't have an FCM 605 00:29:54,400 --> 00:29:56,800 Speaker 5: at all, and then you have everything in between, and 606 00:29:56,840 --> 00:29:58,400 Speaker 5: so we need to think about that. We need to 607 00:29:58,440 --> 00:30:01,239 Speaker 5: make sure there's consistent standard. So we don't want a 608 00:30:01,280 --> 00:30:05,160 Speaker 5: regulatory arbitrage where because you don't have the broker, you're 609 00:30:05,200 --> 00:30:08,040 Speaker 5: able to do more. Now, the way that these have 610 00:30:08,080 --> 00:30:10,720 Speaker 5: been set up under no action letters today, they do 611 00:30:10,840 --> 00:30:15,240 Speaker 5: not allow for any margin, so they're fully collateralized. And 612 00:30:15,320 --> 00:30:18,920 Speaker 5: so if you go directly to the clearinghouse as a customer, 613 00:30:19,200 --> 00:30:22,000 Speaker 5: you're putting up full collateral, and so that's something as 614 00:30:22,000 --> 00:30:25,280 Speaker 5: well where we're seeing more institutional interests in these markets. 615 00:30:25,440 --> 00:30:27,440 Speaker 5: They would prefer to be able to put up margin 616 00:30:27,480 --> 00:30:30,240 Speaker 5: and go through a broker, or have a model where 617 00:30:30,240 --> 00:30:31,920 Speaker 5: you don't have the broker at all, but you're able 618 00:30:31,960 --> 00:30:34,640 Speaker 5: to use margin. So we're thinking about all these things. 619 00:30:34,680 --> 00:30:36,600 Speaker 5: It's a really interesting time, as I said, to be 620 00:30:36,640 --> 00:30:41,040 Speaker 5: thinking about market structure for things that really just probably 621 00:30:41,080 --> 00:30:44,719 Speaker 5: should have been done many years ago, and for whatever reason, 622 00:30:45,000 --> 00:30:47,240 Speaker 5: people relied on these no action letters and really I 623 00:30:47,280 --> 00:30:49,240 Speaker 5: guess it was more of an ankle biter at the 624 00:30:49,280 --> 00:30:51,280 Speaker 5: time and didn't get a full regime. 625 00:30:51,360 --> 00:30:52,600 Speaker 4: But we're thinking about all of that. 626 00:31:08,520 --> 00:31:11,160 Speaker 2: Donald Trump Junior is an advisor to Kelsey. He's on 627 00:31:11,160 --> 00:31:14,120 Speaker 2: the board of poly Market, and it looks like truth Social, 628 00:31:14,200 --> 00:31:17,080 Speaker 2: which is largely owned by President Trump, is also going 629 00:31:17,160 --> 00:31:20,320 Speaker 2: to launch something called truth predict. How should the public 630 00:31:20,360 --> 00:31:25,120 Speaker 2: feel comfortable that these are well regulated markets given the 631 00:31:25,440 --> 00:31:28,240 Speaker 2: very obvious sort of like stake that the president and 632 00:31:28,320 --> 00:31:29,640 Speaker 2: his family has in this industry. 633 00:31:30,120 --> 00:31:35,160 Speaker 5: These are designated contract markets like any other. We've regulated 634 00:31:35,200 --> 00:31:39,040 Speaker 5: these markets for many, many years for decades, they have 635 00:31:39,120 --> 00:31:42,960 Speaker 5: some of the most stringent regulatory requirements. As I mentioned, 636 00:31:43,200 --> 00:31:46,480 Speaker 5: these are nearly five hundred trillion dollars notional markets that 637 00:31:46,520 --> 00:31:49,239 Speaker 5: we regulate. We take it very seriously. We put these 638 00:31:49,320 --> 00:31:53,560 Speaker 5: fraud and manipulation these markets. So I think everybody can 639 00:31:54,080 --> 00:31:57,000 Speaker 5: rest asshore that we are on top of protecting the markets. 640 00:31:57,240 --> 00:31:59,480 Speaker 5: And we think it's great that there's a broad swath 641 00:31:59,520 --> 00:32:00,960 Speaker 5: of in the markets. 642 00:32:01,200 --> 00:32:03,640 Speaker 2: But like so for example, when you're figuring out, like 643 00:32:03,680 --> 00:32:07,680 Speaker 2: what is the appropriate level of advertising, going back to 644 00:32:08,080 --> 00:32:12,080 Speaker 2: those kelshy ads, and you're thinking, like okay, like talking 645 00:32:12,120 --> 00:32:14,720 Speaker 2: to market participants, like who is that? And like how 646 00:32:14,760 --> 00:32:17,760 Speaker 2: should people feel comfortable that you're going to find that 647 00:32:17,880 --> 00:32:20,440 Speaker 2: right line. Again, when the administration has like a very 648 00:32:20,480 --> 00:32:25,120 Speaker 2: clear economic stake in this industry and having the industry. 649 00:32:24,680 --> 00:32:26,280 Speaker 4: Grow, so we adhere to the law. 650 00:32:26,320 --> 00:32:29,400 Speaker 5: I mean, the Commodity Exchange Act is our authorizing statute. 651 00:32:29,520 --> 00:32:31,600 Speaker 5: We act in accordance with the Commodity Exchange Act, and 652 00:32:31,600 --> 00:32:34,760 Speaker 5: we have very strict ethics and you know, government requirements, 653 00:32:34,800 --> 00:32:37,680 Speaker 5: and as does I think everyone in this administration. 654 00:32:37,880 --> 00:32:39,440 Speaker 4: So we take off that very seriously. 655 00:32:39,960 --> 00:32:42,080 Speaker 3: So speaking of Trump, we should talk a little bit 656 00:32:42,080 --> 00:32:45,920 Speaker 3: more about crypto because it's been having a pretty bad 657 00:32:46,000 --> 00:32:49,480 Speaker 3: month so far, and I think one of the big 658 00:32:49,520 --> 00:32:52,640 Speaker 3: hopes of the industry, the Clarity Act, seems to be 659 00:32:52,880 --> 00:32:57,560 Speaker 3: stalled in Congress. What happens if that doesn't go through 660 00:32:57,720 --> 00:33:00,080 Speaker 3: because you've sort of I feel like you've committed your 661 00:33:00,080 --> 00:33:05,959 Speaker 3: self to being a crypto digital asset friendly regulator in 662 00:33:06,000 --> 00:33:06,880 Speaker 3: many ways. 663 00:33:07,160 --> 00:33:08,600 Speaker 4: Well thanks to the President's leadership. 664 00:33:08,600 --> 00:33:11,640 Speaker 5: I really do think we're at a critical moment where 665 00:33:11,760 --> 00:33:15,880 Speaker 5: we've got genius now as law regulation by enforcements done. 666 00:33:16,080 --> 00:33:19,120 Speaker 5: We've got the Clarity Act that's really on the precipice. 667 00:33:19,480 --> 00:33:22,560 Speaker 5: I think there's a few issues that are being ironed out. 668 00:33:22,560 --> 00:33:24,760 Speaker 5: Actually as we speak, I know there's a meeting today. 669 00:33:25,480 --> 00:33:27,400 Speaker 5: I'm more hopeful that that's going to get done. I 670 00:33:27,480 --> 00:33:30,480 Speaker 5: think that's going to set a really future proof framework 671 00:33:30,560 --> 00:33:34,080 Speaker 5: for crypto here in the US. We can't allow European 672 00:33:34,160 --> 00:33:39,280 Speaker 5: countries and others to lead in this area without US involvement, leadership, 673 00:33:39,320 --> 00:33:41,760 Speaker 5: and so we're committed to getting that done. I think 674 00:33:41,840 --> 00:33:45,560 Speaker 5: we've got a really great bill that's that's almost at 675 00:33:45,560 --> 00:33:46,520 Speaker 5: the finish line. 676 00:33:46,840 --> 00:33:48,160 Speaker 4: If it doesn't get done. 677 00:33:47,880 --> 00:33:49,840 Speaker 5: Look, I think there's a lot of authority that the 678 00:33:49,880 --> 00:33:53,520 Speaker 5: agencies have, but it's important with low or Bright and 679 00:33:53,560 --> 00:33:56,040 Speaker 5: some of the case law that takes a little bit 680 00:33:56,040 --> 00:34:00,600 Speaker 5: of the agency's discretion over nuances in the statue and 681 00:34:00,640 --> 00:34:03,440 Speaker 5: puts that back to Congress and the courts. I think 682 00:34:03,480 --> 00:34:06,160 Speaker 5: it's really important to have more baked into the statute 683 00:34:06,160 --> 00:34:08,080 Speaker 5: than not, and so we're hopeful that we'll get a 684 00:34:08,080 --> 00:34:08,840 Speaker 5: statute in place. 685 00:34:09,160 --> 00:34:11,080 Speaker 2: You know, one of the areas that crypto seems to 686 00:34:11,160 --> 00:34:14,879 Speaker 2: have been at the forefront of is perpetual futures and 687 00:34:14,960 --> 00:34:17,640 Speaker 2: you know, very popular. You see like you can get 688 00:34:17,640 --> 00:34:21,640 Speaker 2: one hundred and one leverage trading the futures on some platforms. 689 00:34:21,960 --> 00:34:25,920 Speaker 2: Do you see the more use of perpetual purpose in 690 00:34:25,960 --> 00:34:29,520 Speaker 2: a sort of traditional finance? Could we have perpetual oil 691 00:34:29,600 --> 00:34:32,200 Speaker 2: futures at some point? Like could you envision them? 692 00:34:32,480 --> 00:34:34,480 Speaker 5: Well, right now we're thinking about it in crypto. I 693 00:34:34,480 --> 00:34:35,799 Speaker 5: think they're real, Like, you. 694 00:34:35,760 --> 00:34:39,040 Speaker 2: Know, trade it on chain like all futures. Like again, 695 00:34:39,080 --> 00:34:42,520 Speaker 2: if we're like okay, crypto provides the infrastructure, but could 696 00:34:42,520 --> 00:34:45,719 Speaker 2: you like why not trade an oil purp on chain? 697 00:34:46,040 --> 00:34:48,840 Speaker 5: Look, if there's demand for these products, it's definitely something 698 00:34:48,840 --> 00:34:51,160 Speaker 5: that we're all consider and look at. Right now, the 699 00:34:51,200 --> 00:34:54,040 Speaker 5: overwhelming demand's been in the crypto space. We've seen some 700 00:34:54,160 --> 00:34:58,160 Speaker 5: demand in precious metals gold and silver. We have to 701 00:34:58,200 --> 00:35:02,520 Speaker 5: consider the susceptible of each contract to manipulation, So there 702 00:35:02,560 --> 00:35:05,920 Speaker 5: might be unique considerations around a contract that doesn't have 703 00:35:05,960 --> 00:35:11,120 Speaker 5: a physical delivery date for example pork bellies or other things, 704 00:35:11,320 --> 00:35:14,880 Speaker 5: and that can create issues within the supply and liquidity 705 00:35:14,880 --> 00:35:18,879 Speaker 5: for the futures contracts. So something we're thinking about. We're 706 00:35:18,920 --> 00:35:22,400 Speaker 5: definitely excited about all this innovation. It's been too long 707 00:35:22,480 --> 00:35:25,680 Speaker 5: that this stuff is only developed offshore, and we really 708 00:35:25,680 --> 00:35:28,120 Speaker 5: want to bring it back with clear rules of the road. 709 00:35:28,200 --> 00:35:30,840 Speaker 5: So it's really important that the US leads and that 710 00:35:30,880 --> 00:35:33,720 Speaker 5: we set the standard that other countries are going to follow, 711 00:35:33,840 --> 00:35:37,279 Speaker 5: rather than just allow this stuff to flourish offshore with 712 00:35:37,400 --> 00:35:40,680 Speaker 5: potentially less regulation. As you all know, when you offer 713 00:35:40,719 --> 00:35:44,399 Speaker 5: into various countries, there's different rules around offering directly in 714 00:35:44,520 --> 00:35:48,560 Speaker 5: or solicitation verse solicitation, all of that. So we're certainly 715 00:35:48,680 --> 00:35:50,640 Speaker 5: aware of that, we're thinking about it. We want to 716 00:35:50,680 --> 00:35:54,560 Speaker 5: set really clear and kind of best in class standards 717 00:35:54,600 --> 00:35:55,520 Speaker 5: for US markets. 718 00:35:56,160 --> 00:35:58,239 Speaker 3: Just going back to prediction markets, I know you keep 719 00:35:58,239 --> 00:36:03,120 Speaker 3: emphasizing that you're not a merit based regulator, right, so 720 00:36:03,160 --> 00:36:06,040 Speaker 3: you're not making decisions on what people should be betting 721 00:36:06,080 --> 00:36:08,359 Speaker 3: on or what they can bet on. But is there like, 722 00:36:09,000 --> 00:36:12,480 Speaker 3: is there a line at some point that you wouldn't 723 00:36:12,520 --> 00:36:16,319 Speaker 3: want to see private companies actually cross, Like if someone 724 00:36:16,320 --> 00:36:19,759 Speaker 3: creates a contract for like someone's going to die, right, 725 00:36:19,920 --> 00:36:23,520 Speaker 3: a violent death or something like that, that would seem problematic. 726 00:36:23,120 --> 00:36:25,400 Speaker 2: Or a contract that this came up when we talked 727 00:36:25,400 --> 00:36:29,480 Speaker 2: to Don Wilson in Chicago, the contract for whether people 728 00:36:29,480 --> 00:36:33,200 Speaker 2: would throw sex toys onto the court during a WNBA game, which, 729 00:36:33,239 --> 00:36:36,720 Speaker 2: of course the existence of the contract right illicit people 730 00:36:36,840 --> 00:36:40,120 Speaker 2: to do it change their behavior, also kind of dangerous, 731 00:36:40,280 --> 00:36:41,359 Speaker 2: Like where's the line? 732 00:36:41,440 --> 00:36:44,440 Speaker 5: The latter seems highly at risk of, you know, being 733 00:36:44,480 --> 00:36:47,600 Speaker 5: susceptible to pipulation, which we do have authority to reject. 734 00:36:48,120 --> 00:36:52,480 Speaker 5: I think with other categories assassination and the like, there 735 00:36:52,560 --> 00:36:55,480 Speaker 5: is authority within our statute to prohibit, so we would 736 00:36:55,560 --> 00:36:58,000 Speaker 5: exercise that authority. You know, there's certain areas where we 737 00:36:58,160 --> 00:37:02,480 Speaker 5: certainly would not want contracts being offered, but with others, 738 00:37:02,480 --> 00:37:04,799 Speaker 5: look where we're not, as I said, a merit regulator, 739 00:37:05,160 --> 00:37:06,880 Speaker 5: We're not going to go and say you can't have 740 00:37:06,960 --> 00:37:09,600 Speaker 5: a contract in sports you can't have a contract in politics, 741 00:37:09,640 --> 00:37:12,719 Speaker 5: but the details matter, and we are evaluating that. 742 00:37:13,480 --> 00:37:15,520 Speaker 2: Just going back to you know, the sort of basic question. 743 00:37:15,560 --> 00:37:19,080 Speaker 2: A lot of states attorneys generals are attorneys general? Did 744 00:37:19,080 --> 00:37:21,440 Speaker 2: I say that I pluralize the attorneys attorney? A lot 745 00:37:21,480 --> 00:37:24,279 Speaker 2: of states attorneys general. You know, there's a lot of 746 00:37:24,320 --> 00:37:27,080 Speaker 2: court fights about this. And they look at this and 747 00:37:27,160 --> 00:37:29,040 Speaker 2: like many people would, and they say, look, this is 748 00:37:29,280 --> 00:37:31,560 Speaker 2: this is betting, this is this is gambling. This certainly 749 00:37:31,560 --> 00:37:34,680 Speaker 2: looks like sports gambling. Kelsey himself ran ads that said 750 00:37:34,840 --> 00:37:37,120 Speaker 2: sports betting is now legal in your stay, and I 751 00:37:37,120 --> 00:37:41,200 Speaker 2: think they've pulled those back, et cetera. But from the 752 00:37:41,239 --> 00:37:44,680 Speaker 2: perspective of the public, it certainly looks like by putting 753 00:37:44,680 --> 00:37:48,880 Speaker 2: sports betting into this framework that it's undermined the ability 754 00:37:48,880 --> 00:37:51,000 Speaker 2: of states to like set the rules about who can 755 00:37:51,040 --> 00:37:51,560 Speaker 2: bet on one. 756 00:37:52,120 --> 00:37:55,680 Speaker 5: Well, there's a great law journal article by professor's and 757 00:37:55,880 --> 00:37:58,840 Speaker 5: he's a securities law professor. This must have been written 758 00:37:58,880 --> 00:38:01,160 Speaker 5: in the early two thousand, but it was before the 759 00:38:01,440 --> 00:38:09,160 Speaker 5: financial crisis. Comparing derivatives, futures, contracts, securities, insurance products, gambling. 760 00:38:09,640 --> 00:38:12,680 Speaker 5: These are all products that you can take similar economic 761 00:38:12,719 --> 00:38:16,000 Speaker 5: positions in, but they have different legal treatment, and it's 762 00:38:16,040 --> 00:38:18,600 Speaker 5: because the products are structured different ways. So an insurance 763 00:38:18,680 --> 00:38:22,040 Speaker 5: contract could be structured very similarly to a credit to 764 00:38:22,120 --> 00:38:24,680 Speaker 5: false swap, but you have an ensurable interest. So the 765 00:38:24,680 --> 00:38:26,839 Speaker 5: details do matter, and we are looking at that. So 766 00:38:26,880 --> 00:38:29,680 Speaker 5: it's not the case that we're going into the casinos 767 00:38:29,680 --> 00:38:33,520 Speaker 5: and saying you're offering legal off exchange swaps. But if 768 00:38:33,520 --> 00:38:36,680 Speaker 5: the products are structured as swaps, then we have authority there. 769 00:38:36,760 --> 00:38:40,640 Speaker 5: And so many of these platforms that are offering products 770 00:38:40,640 --> 00:38:42,920 Speaker 5: that may have some similar economic attributes. 771 00:38:43,200 --> 00:38:44,440 Speaker 4: But the details do matter. 772 00:38:44,520 --> 00:38:46,440 Speaker 5: Right, As I mentioned, you can you have to go 773 00:38:46,520 --> 00:38:49,960 Speaker 5: through a clearinghouse, the products can be offset, you can 774 00:38:49,960 --> 00:38:51,120 Speaker 5: get in and out of your position. 775 00:38:51,120 --> 00:38:52,320 Speaker 4: There are different they matter. 776 00:38:53,280 --> 00:38:55,600 Speaker 2: I totally get that. But do they matter from the 777 00:38:55,640 --> 00:38:58,960 Speaker 2: perspective of like a nineteen year old who's addicted to 778 00:38:59,000 --> 00:38:59,800 Speaker 2: betting on sports. 779 00:39:00,040 --> 00:39:03,200 Speaker 5: Well, I think that's a question for society as a whole, 780 00:39:03,640 --> 00:39:05,839 Speaker 5: for Congress, right, I mean, to the extent we don't 781 00:39:05,880 --> 00:39:08,680 Speaker 5: want a nineteen year old trading Nvidia stock options either. 782 00:39:09,080 --> 00:39:11,840 Speaker 4: That's something that you can talk to Congress about. 783 00:39:12,080 --> 00:39:15,360 Speaker 5: But the reality is that today we allow eighteen plus 784 00:39:15,360 --> 00:39:18,799 Speaker 5: in our financial markets, and there's responsibility associated with that, 785 00:39:18,840 --> 00:39:20,880 Speaker 5: they have to go through a broker. In many cases 786 00:39:21,200 --> 00:39:24,360 Speaker 5: there is this nuance of the non intermediated model, but 787 00:39:24,440 --> 00:39:27,200 Speaker 5: there's screening as well to be able to access those markets. 788 00:39:27,239 --> 00:39:29,280 Speaker 4: And so we do have standards, we do have rules. 789 00:39:29,280 --> 00:39:32,040 Speaker 5: Everything's done in accordance with an exchange rule book and 790 00:39:32,080 --> 00:39:34,799 Speaker 5: we enforce that and we are policing those markets. But 791 00:39:34,840 --> 00:39:39,960 Speaker 5: I think this more eternalistic question of what age should 792 00:39:40,000 --> 00:39:41,160 Speaker 5: be the age to be able to. 793 00:39:41,120 --> 00:39:42,160 Speaker 4: Participate in the markets. 794 00:39:42,400 --> 00:39:45,000 Speaker 5: These people can be drafted, go off to war, and 795 00:39:45,080 --> 00:39:47,920 Speaker 5: so a question of whether they can trade options on 796 00:39:48,600 --> 00:39:51,080 Speaker 5: the outcome of the super Bowl, you know. 797 00:39:51,120 --> 00:39:54,200 Speaker 4: I think that's not really for the regulator to decide. 798 00:39:54,360 --> 00:39:57,440 Speaker 3: You know, you said you were ramping up staffing to 799 00:39:57,800 --> 00:40:00,640 Speaker 3: you know, help regulate all these new markets. It's new 800 00:40:00,680 --> 00:40:04,360 Speaker 3: and fast growing markets. What's the hiring process or the 801 00:40:04,440 --> 00:40:07,640 Speaker 3: hiring experience actually like at the moment, because you know, 802 00:40:07,760 --> 00:40:11,000 Speaker 3: thinking back to last year twenty twenty five, all the 803 00:40:11,040 --> 00:40:15,040 Speaker 3: headlines when it came to government employment were you know, layoffs, 804 00:40:15,440 --> 00:40:19,680 Speaker 3: mass firing, streamlining. What's what's that like for you now? 805 00:40:19,719 --> 00:40:21,160 Speaker 3: Is it easy to get people in the door? 806 00:40:21,600 --> 00:40:23,759 Speaker 5: Well, look, there are there to the extent there are 807 00:40:24,000 --> 00:40:28,160 Speaker 5: areas where we need additional staff. We are evaluating based 808 00:40:28,200 --> 00:40:31,800 Speaker 5: on competence and the highest quality. We do not want 809 00:40:32,160 --> 00:40:34,479 Speaker 5: to just bring on bodies to bring on bodies. We're 810 00:40:34,480 --> 00:40:36,520 Speaker 5: making sure that we're bringing on the right people for 811 00:40:36,560 --> 00:40:40,520 Speaker 5: the rules, and in many cases we are very well staffed. 812 00:40:40,600 --> 00:40:42,440 Speaker 5: I think there are some needs that we're looking to 813 00:40:42,480 --> 00:40:45,760 Speaker 5: fill out, but again it's very much akin to hiring 814 00:40:45,760 --> 00:40:47,719 Speaker 5: it a private company. We're looking to bring on the 815 00:40:47,719 --> 00:40:50,400 Speaker 5: best and the brightest who really want to help revitalize 816 00:40:50,440 --> 00:40:53,440 Speaker 5: the agency, fill out needs for the agency. And we are, 817 00:40:53,600 --> 00:40:56,399 Speaker 5: as I mentioned earlier, relying a lot on technology as well, 818 00:40:56,440 --> 00:40:59,719 Speaker 5: because there's just so much that many years ago really 819 00:40:59,719 --> 00:41:01,879 Speaker 5: had to be done manually that can be done very 820 00:41:01,960 --> 00:41:04,080 Speaker 5: quickly through new technologies. 821 00:41:04,400 --> 00:41:06,560 Speaker 3: Well, this has been a perennial question, which is how 822 00:41:06,600 --> 00:41:10,120 Speaker 3: government agencies actually compete with the private sector to get 823 00:41:10,280 --> 00:41:13,040 Speaker 3: good people. How are you doing that at the moment 824 00:41:13,160 --> 00:41:16,200 Speaker 3: given that, I mean, I imagine you have some form 825 00:41:16,440 --> 00:41:20,840 Speaker 3: of budget constraint, and I would imagine that it's probably 826 00:41:21,520 --> 00:41:24,040 Speaker 3: your budget is not as big as like, I don't know, 827 00:41:24,200 --> 00:41:27,560 Speaker 3: CMEs or something like that. How do you actually compete? 828 00:41:28,440 --> 00:41:30,719 Speaker 5: Well, look, I think part of that's the mission. We 829 00:41:31,200 --> 00:41:35,680 Speaker 5: are really interested in making sure that these markets flourish 830 00:41:35,719 --> 00:41:38,680 Speaker 5: here in the United States. It's an exciting time. Many 831 00:41:38,760 --> 00:41:41,440 Speaker 5: people are interested in being able to contribute to that effort. 832 00:41:41,440 --> 00:41:45,000 Speaker 5: We're really, as I said earlier, setting new market structure 833 00:41:45,239 --> 00:41:49,759 Speaker 5: for this asset class as well as for blockchain based markets, 834 00:41:50,040 --> 00:41:51,600 Speaker 5: and a lot of the things that needed to be 835 00:41:51,640 --> 00:41:53,839 Speaker 5: fixed in the wake of Dot frank that frankly were 836 00:41:53,880 --> 00:41:57,080 Speaker 5: never fixed. So I think it's in part mission impart 837 00:41:57,120 --> 00:41:59,480 Speaker 5: people that are willing to serve and come in and 838 00:41:59,520 --> 00:42:01,640 Speaker 5: maybe they don't don't get the salary that they get 839 00:42:01,680 --> 00:42:04,680 Speaker 5: in the private sector, but that's not necessarily a bad thing. 840 00:42:04,719 --> 00:42:07,200 Speaker 5: They get a lot of value out of being working 841 00:42:07,400 --> 00:42:08,040 Speaker 5: for the government. 842 00:42:08,320 --> 00:42:10,880 Speaker 2: Going back to the question of like marketing and again 843 00:42:11,239 --> 00:42:14,560 Speaker 2: gambling marketing, there's always like some line or whatever about 844 00:42:14,560 --> 00:42:17,799 Speaker 2: people who get addicted. Would you like Congress to come 845 00:42:17,840 --> 00:42:21,279 Speaker 2: in and create rules? Should Congress come up with the 846 00:42:21,360 --> 00:42:24,040 Speaker 2: rule about prediction market advertising. 847 00:42:25,400 --> 00:42:28,279 Speaker 5: We've got a lot of authority to regulate our participants. 848 00:42:28,520 --> 00:42:31,919 Speaker 5: I think there's sometimes a real need for Congress, maybe 849 00:42:31,920 --> 00:42:34,359 Speaker 5: to the extent as you all mentioned, if you really 850 00:42:34,360 --> 00:42:37,120 Speaker 5: want to set some sort of more paternalists stick rule 851 00:42:37,200 --> 00:42:39,400 Speaker 5: around you have to be eighteen era twenty one to 852 00:42:39,400 --> 00:42:40,520 Speaker 5: participate in the markets. 853 00:42:40,920 --> 00:42:41,799 Speaker 4: That sort of thing. 854 00:42:41,920 --> 00:42:45,000 Speaker 5: Sure, you can talk to Congress about with respect to 855 00:42:45,040 --> 00:42:48,520 Speaker 5: the more nuanced pieces of how we regulate the markets. 856 00:42:48,560 --> 00:42:52,960 Speaker 5: That's stuff that we handle. It's not typically baked into statute. 857 00:42:53,040 --> 00:42:55,279 Speaker 5: We go through our notice and comment process and get 858 00:42:55,400 --> 00:42:57,640 Speaker 5: input from the public on those sorts of things. So 859 00:42:57,640 --> 00:42:59,400 Speaker 5: I don't necessarily think you need to kick everything to 860 00:42:59,480 --> 00:43:02,799 Speaker 5: Congress within the details, but it certainly could be something 861 00:43:03,000 --> 00:43:03,600 Speaker 5: that people. 862 00:43:03,760 --> 00:43:05,919 Speaker 2: It's a lot of countries, you know, regard or sorry, 863 00:43:05,960 --> 00:43:08,440 Speaker 2: a lot of states regard like okay under twenty one, 864 00:43:08,520 --> 00:43:10,520 Speaker 2: like we don't want that right, And it sounds like 865 00:43:10,560 --> 00:43:14,239 Speaker 2: you regard that as paternalism in action, which you know, 866 00:43:14,400 --> 00:43:17,440 Speaker 2: I understand a lot of people share that view. But 867 00:43:18,080 --> 00:43:20,200 Speaker 2: you know, it also seems like the CFTC. You know, 868 00:43:20,760 --> 00:43:23,719 Speaker 2: people have different views, and it sounds like the CFTC 869 00:43:23,880 --> 00:43:26,799 Speaker 2: is sort of undermining of value that a state might 870 00:43:26,880 --> 00:43:27,760 Speaker 2: have about gambling. 871 00:43:28,440 --> 00:43:29,319 Speaker 4: I don't view it that way. 872 00:43:29,520 --> 00:43:33,680 Speaker 5: I do think our derivatives' markets are a separate area 873 00:43:33,920 --> 00:43:38,880 Speaker 5: within government and within the law, as opposed to the state. 874 00:43:38,680 --> 00:43:39,440 Speaker 4: Gambling and the. 875 00:43:41,200 --> 00:43:45,280 Speaker 5: Rules and requirements that govern a state casino are very different. 876 00:43:45,680 --> 00:43:48,440 Speaker 5: They can do a lot different things than what a 877 00:43:48,800 --> 00:43:51,719 Speaker 5: regulated futures exchange can do, and so I do think 878 00:43:51,760 --> 00:43:55,279 Speaker 5: there's some give and take, some for sure limitation on 879 00:43:55,440 --> 00:43:58,360 Speaker 5: the age piece. But look, you can serve alcohol and 880 00:43:58,360 --> 00:44:00,080 Speaker 5: a casino and allow people to bet on sport, or 881 00:44:00,200 --> 00:44:03,640 Speaker 5: you can't do that necessarily at a digital exchange. 882 00:44:03,680 --> 00:44:05,240 Speaker 4: Maybe somebody's got to beer on the side. 883 00:44:05,280 --> 00:44:07,799 Speaker 5: But I do think there's a lot of different restrictions 884 00:44:08,040 --> 00:44:10,160 Speaker 5: in a different environment in which people are trading, so 885 00:44:10,200 --> 00:44:11,680 Speaker 5: it's not quite apple stables. 886 00:44:11,920 --> 00:44:14,880 Speaker 2: Mike Seeling, thank you so much for coming on odd laws, 887 00:44:14,920 --> 00:44:16,640 Speaker 2: a perfect guess at the perfect time. 888 00:44:16,840 --> 00:44:17,719 Speaker 4: Thanks for having me. 889 00:44:30,000 --> 00:44:34,400 Speaker 3: I enjoyed that conversation me too. However, there are a 890 00:44:34,480 --> 00:44:39,439 Speaker 3: number of difficulties with regulating prediction markets, and I'm kind 891 00:44:39,440 --> 00:44:42,399 Speaker 3: of trying to like zoom in on what I think 892 00:44:42,480 --> 00:44:46,040 Speaker 3: might be the primary one. So Number one, the CFTC 893 00:44:46,120 --> 00:44:49,920 Speaker 3: exists to regulate risk management, right, which is what Mike said. 894 00:44:51,400 --> 00:44:55,040 Speaker 3: It is very doubtful to me that someone needs to 895 00:44:55,120 --> 00:44:59,799 Speaker 3: manage their exposure to Cardi B performing on stage at 896 00:44:59,800 --> 00:45:03,880 Speaker 3: the Super Bowl, So it's not even entirely clear to 897 00:45:04,000 --> 00:45:07,680 Speaker 3: me that this is an industry that the CFTC should 898 00:45:07,719 --> 00:45:12,040 Speaker 3: be regulating. Now that said, that's a big tension, yeah, right, 899 00:45:12,080 --> 00:45:16,239 Speaker 3: And then just beyond that, you could certainly argue that 900 00:45:16,400 --> 00:45:22,120 Speaker 3: by legitimizing prediction markets and helping them to grow, you 901 00:45:22,160 --> 00:45:26,360 Speaker 3: are in fact introducing a new risk into the system 902 00:45:26,480 --> 00:45:29,120 Speaker 3: because everyone's going to start gambling away I don't know, 903 00:45:29,160 --> 00:45:31,200 Speaker 3: their college funds or whatever, you know. 904 00:45:31,320 --> 00:45:34,799 Speaker 2: I think Mike made an interesting observation sort of near 905 00:45:34,840 --> 00:45:38,040 Speaker 2: the end of the conversation that like, and it's totally true, 906 00:45:38,080 --> 00:45:44,560 Speaker 2: like different market structures warrant different types of regulatory treatment, right, so, 907 00:45:44,680 --> 00:45:47,040 Speaker 2: and I think that makes sense. I think what's interesting 908 00:45:47,080 --> 00:45:50,240 Speaker 2: though about this conversation, particularly as it relates to sports betting, 909 00:45:50,440 --> 00:45:54,040 Speaker 2: is that part of the reason that states have sort 910 00:45:54,080 --> 00:45:57,359 Speaker 2: of in many cases either no sports betting or very 911 00:45:57,400 --> 00:46:00,440 Speaker 2: stringent rules about who can engage in sports betting has 912 00:46:00,480 --> 00:46:03,759 Speaker 2: nothing to do with financial risk and everything to do 913 00:46:03,800 --> 00:46:06,320 Speaker 2: with a sort of like moral choice about who gets 914 00:46:06,360 --> 00:46:09,040 Speaker 2: to sports bet And so, you know, on one head 915 00:46:09,120 --> 00:46:11,680 Speaker 2: is like, okay, there's like traditional sports books, they have 916 00:46:11,719 --> 00:46:14,239 Speaker 2: a house that sets the odds. It's definitely true that 917 00:46:14,280 --> 00:46:17,960 Speaker 2: prediction market companies have like a different market structure, but 918 00:46:18,080 --> 00:46:20,440 Speaker 2: from a sort of like why does society want to 919 00:46:20,480 --> 00:46:23,680 Speaker 2: constrain the role of sports betting. It's not because of 920 00:46:23,760 --> 00:46:26,719 Speaker 2: like any sort of like financial instability risk, because we 921 00:46:26,760 --> 00:46:29,400 Speaker 2: don't want certain people like eighteen year olds, people who 922 00:46:29,480 --> 00:46:32,400 Speaker 2: might still be in high school, having access to sports betting. 923 00:46:32,760 --> 00:46:35,440 Speaker 2: And when the c OFTC says, like, you know, this 924 00:46:35,520 --> 00:46:38,160 Speaker 2: is just this is a new type of financial instrument 925 00:46:38,160 --> 00:46:40,600 Speaker 2: that should be regulated like a financial instrument, it sort 926 00:46:40,600 --> 00:46:43,640 Speaker 2: of undercuts that sort of choice that the state has made. 927 00:46:43,800 --> 00:46:46,960 Speaker 3: Yeah, exactly do you think sports betting is like the 928 00:46:47,000 --> 00:46:47,960 Speaker 3: new monoculture? 929 00:46:48,280 --> 00:46:50,480 Speaker 2: It is really incredible how pervasive it is, and it's 930 00:46:50,520 --> 00:46:53,520 Speaker 2: really incredible. But also it's just incredible, you know, truly 931 00:46:53,560 --> 00:46:56,200 Speaker 2: how pervasive betting on everything is. And you know, I 932 00:46:56,200 --> 00:47:01,799 Speaker 2: should say like I am an enthusiastic consumer of the 933 00:47:01,840 --> 00:47:03,960 Speaker 2: prediction market's data, you know, like I said at the 934 00:47:04,040 --> 00:47:07,440 Speaker 2: very beginning, like I now on all kinds of things, 935 00:47:07,560 --> 00:47:09,879 Speaker 2: including FED decisions. You know, Like I think it's very 936 00:47:09,960 --> 00:47:13,040 Speaker 2: useful to say, like you look at like certain measures 937 00:47:13,040 --> 00:47:15,319 Speaker 2: of like I don't know, you know, the FED fund 938 00:47:15,360 --> 00:47:18,200 Speaker 2: swaps or whatever, like you just look at WORP. I 939 00:47:18,239 --> 00:47:20,200 Speaker 2: love WORP too, but like as simple we have it 940 00:47:20,239 --> 00:47:22,279 Speaker 2: on the Bloomberg now poly market. Will there be three 941 00:47:22,320 --> 00:47:25,759 Speaker 2: rate cuts this year? That is also a useful instrument 942 00:47:25,840 --> 00:47:28,799 Speaker 2: to have. But there are a lot of things that 943 00:47:28,880 --> 00:47:32,560 Speaker 2: prediction markets have and again that a aren't that but 944 00:47:32,680 --> 00:47:34,160 Speaker 2: I you know, I like a lot of them. I 945 00:47:34,239 --> 00:47:36,760 Speaker 2: like looking at election ods. I like looking at whether 946 00:47:37,120 --> 00:47:40,360 Speaker 2: the odds of like some company what they're going to say, Like, 947 00:47:40,360 --> 00:47:42,239 Speaker 2: I think there's a lot of useful signal from them. 948 00:47:42,520 --> 00:47:45,120 Speaker 2: It's also true that the platforms are largely sports betting 949 00:47:45,120 --> 00:47:45,399 Speaker 2: at this. 950 00:47:45,320 --> 00:47:48,200 Speaker 3: Point, right right, how much signal do you actually need 951 00:47:48,239 --> 00:47:51,920 Speaker 3: about I don't know, the Super Bowl. I'm sure some 952 00:47:51,960 --> 00:47:55,480 Speaker 3: people are really into it, but from a trading. 953 00:47:55,800 --> 00:47:59,560 Speaker 2: Sort of from a financial regulation standpoint, it's a different 954 00:47:59,600 --> 00:48:02,880 Speaker 2: question anyway. And it's also true, by the way, that 955 00:48:02,960 --> 00:48:06,960 Speaker 2: the Trump family is very invested, quite literally into this space, 956 00:48:07,000 --> 00:48:10,640 Speaker 2: and I think that quite reasonably. Should you know, raise 957 00:48:10,680 --> 00:48:15,080 Speaker 2: some questions about like how policy is being made about 958 00:48:15,160 --> 00:48:17,120 Speaker 2: the growth of this industry incentives? 959 00:48:17,239 --> 00:48:18,880 Speaker 3: Yeah, for sure? All right, shall we leave it there. 960 00:48:19,000 --> 00:48:19,759 Speaker 2: Let's leave it there. 961 00:48:20,000 --> 00:48:22,240 Speaker 3: This has been another episode of the oud Loots podcast. 962 00:48:22,320 --> 00:48:25,439 Speaker 3: I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me at Tracy Alloway and. 963 00:48:25,360 --> 00:48:28,160 Speaker 2: I'm Jill Wisenthal. You can follow me at the Stalwart, 964 00:48:28,520 --> 00:48:31,720 Speaker 2: follow our guest Michael Selig He's at Michael Selig. Follow 965 00:48:31,719 --> 00:48:35,080 Speaker 2: our producers Carmen Rodriguez at Carmen Rmann, dash Ol Bennett 966 00:48:35,080 --> 00:48:38,840 Speaker 2: at Dashbot, and Kelbrooks at Kilbrooks. And for odd Laws content, 967 00:48:38,880 --> 00:48:41,040 Speaker 2: go to Bloomberg dot com slash odd Lots for a 968 00:48:41,040 --> 00:48:43,560 Speaker 2: the daily newsletter and all of our episodes, and you 969 00:48:43,600 --> 00:48:45,680 Speaker 2: can shat about all of these topics twenty four seven 970 00:48:45,800 --> 00:48:49,120 Speaker 2: in our discord discord dot gg slash outlines. 971 00:48:49,440 --> 00:48:51,640 Speaker 3: And if you enjoy odd Lots, if you like it 972 00:48:51,680 --> 00:48:54,520 Speaker 3: when we talk about regulating prediction markets, then please leave 973 00:48:54,560 --> 00:48:58,040 Speaker 3: us a positive review on your favorite podcast platform. And remember, 974 00:48:58,080 --> 00:49:00,160 Speaker 3: if you are a Bloomberg subscriber, you can listen listen 975 00:49:00,239 --> 00:49:03,120 Speaker 3: to all of our episodes absolutely add free. All you 976 00:49:03,160 --> 00:49:05,240 Speaker 3: need to do is find the Bloomberg channel on Apple 977 00:49:05,280 --> 00:49:08,480 Speaker 3: Podcasts and follow the instructions there. Thanks for listening