WEBVTT - Who Wants to Live Forever?

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Brought to you by Toyota. Let's go places. Welcome to

0:00:07.560 --> 0:00:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Forward Thinking. Hi there, everyone, and welcome to Forward Thinking,

0:00:14.720 --> 0:00:16.759
<v Speaker 1>of the audio podcast that looks at the future and says,

0:00:16.880 --> 0:00:19.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to achieve immortality through my work. I

0:00:19.079 --> 0:00:22.040
<v Speaker 1>want to achieve it by not dying. I'm Jonathan Strickland,

0:00:22.200 --> 0:00:25.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm Lauren back Obama, and I'm Joe McCormick. And that

0:00:25.480 --> 0:00:28.280
<v Speaker 1>quote from Woody Allen that I paraphrased is sort of

0:00:28.320 --> 0:00:32.000
<v Speaker 1>what we're talking about today. We're talking about immortality. M hmm.

0:00:33.520 --> 0:00:35.720
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for the backup there, Joe. Yeah, all right. So

0:00:35.800 --> 0:00:39.839
<v Speaker 1>we recently had an episode about longevity and uh, and

0:00:39.960 --> 0:00:43.080
<v Speaker 1>if you were to extend that logically, then you would

0:00:43.080 --> 0:00:46.600
<v Speaker 1>see that beyond longevity, we'd be talking about the possibility

0:00:46.640 --> 0:00:51.840
<v Speaker 1>of actually attaining immortality or at least prolonging our lifespan

0:00:52.000 --> 0:00:56.040
<v Speaker 1>to the point where, um, we we tend to live indefinitely.

0:00:56.120 --> 0:00:59.360
<v Speaker 1>This is a dream that a lot of futurists have, uh,

0:00:59.400 --> 0:01:01.720
<v Speaker 1>and there are various ways that they have proposed that

0:01:01.760 --> 0:01:05.920
<v Speaker 1>we might actually achieve this dream. Um. But we want

0:01:05.959 --> 0:01:08.040
<v Speaker 1>to talk about sort of a couple of those different

0:01:08.520 --> 0:01:13.040
<v Speaker 1>ideas and then what would that ultimately mean to humans.

0:01:13.440 --> 0:01:17.640
<v Speaker 1>If we were to actually get this ability to live

0:01:17.880 --> 0:01:21.080
<v Speaker 1>effectively for as long as we want to, it raises

0:01:21.120 --> 0:01:24.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of questions. I'd say more than raises questions.

0:01:24.640 --> 0:01:28.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean getting rid of death, well, not getting rid

0:01:28.360 --> 0:01:30.720
<v Speaker 1>of death, because we should make sure to make a

0:01:30.760 --> 0:01:35.360
<v Speaker 1>distinction between uh, the sort of natural immortality, meaning making

0:01:35.400 --> 0:01:38.400
<v Speaker 1>you immune to dying by old age and stuff like that,

0:01:38.520 --> 0:01:42.800
<v Speaker 1>essentially eliminating aging. Yeah, it would be not quite the

0:01:42.840 --> 0:01:45.880
<v Speaker 1>same thing as eliminating death completely, because you if you

0:01:45.920 --> 0:01:47.760
<v Speaker 1>were never we can never make it so that if

0:01:48.080 --> 0:01:50.760
<v Speaker 1>injury or disease were eliminated, that would be an entirely

0:01:50.760 --> 0:01:52.600
<v Speaker 1>different thing, right if you were, if you were able

0:01:52.680 --> 0:01:56.040
<v Speaker 1>to somehow find a medical cure for say, getting hit

0:01:56.080 --> 0:01:59.360
<v Speaker 1>by a bus, then maybe that would lead to effective

0:01:59.360 --> 0:02:03.320
<v Speaker 1>immortality in all aspects. But really, you know, there are

0:02:03.320 --> 0:02:05.640
<v Speaker 1>going to be cases where, unless we find a way

0:02:05.640 --> 0:02:09.720
<v Speaker 1>to make ourselves invulnerable Superman style, uh, death will still

0:02:09.760 --> 0:02:12.240
<v Speaker 1>be something that could happen to you. It's just it

0:02:12.280 --> 0:02:14.480
<v Speaker 1>won't be something that would happen to you just from

0:02:14.520 --> 0:02:17.240
<v Speaker 1>being around the earth too long, unless we're talking about

0:02:17.240 --> 0:02:20.560
<v Speaker 1>digital immortality. Yeah, in that case, you might be talking

0:02:20.560 --> 0:02:23.520
<v Speaker 1>about the death of a physical body, but not of

0:02:23.560 --> 0:02:25.880
<v Speaker 1>the consciousness. But we'll we'll kind of we need to

0:02:25.919 --> 0:02:28.000
<v Speaker 1>break all that down and define it first and then

0:02:28.000 --> 0:02:31.920
<v Speaker 1>talk about what the the concerns are. Right, what I

0:02:31.960 --> 0:02:35.720
<v Speaker 1>started to say about the concerns is that this seems

0:02:35.760 --> 0:02:38.280
<v Speaker 1>to me like it would just completely change what it

0:02:38.560 --> 0:02:41.120
<v Speaker 1>means to be alive, what it means to be humans.

0:02:42.960 --> 0:02:46.679
<v Speaker 1>So much of human civilization, as you know, some kind

0:02:46.720 --> 0:02:50.600
<v Speaker 1>of morbid psychologists might say, is based around avoiding thinking

0:02:50.600 --> 0:02:55.120
<v Speaker 1>about your impending death, or it's about dealing with the

0:02:55.200 --> 0:02:59.560
<v Speaker 1>death of others, or it's about accepting your impending death,

0:02:59.600 --> 0:03:03.240
<v Speaker 1>depending upon which culture you're talking about and how they

0:03:03.360 --> 0:03:06.600
<v Speaker 1>view mortality. And it could be argued that, um that

0:03:06.680 --> 0:03:09.960
<v Speaker 1>we find all of our meaningfulness in life due to

0:03:09.960 --> 0:03:12.840
<v Speaker 1>the fact that it won't last forever exactly right. So

0:03:12.919 --> 0:03:16.600
<v Speaker 1>if you if you remove that, if life lasts indefinitely,

0:03:16.800 --> 0:03:19.840
<v Speaker 1>do you in fact remove meaning or does that just

0:03:19.919 --> 0:03:22.880
<v Speaker 1>mean that we have to redefine it? Uh. These are

0:03:22.880 --> 0:03:24.840
<v Speaker 1>all good conversations that I want to get into. But

0:03:24.919 --> 0:03:27.480
<v Speaker 1>before we get into the philosophical stuff, let's talk about

0:03:27.800 --> 0:03:30.760
<v Speaker 1>some of the actual ways that people have said we

0:03:31.000 --> 0:03:37.720
<v Speaker 1>might somehow achieve immortality. Now, you mentioned digital immortality, Lauren. Now,

0:03:37.800 --> 0:03:40.880
<v Speaker 1>this is an idea that I I personally think is

0:03:41.120 --> 0:03:44.880
<v Speaker 1>very science fiction. E um. It's the idea that we're

0:03:44.920 --> 0:03:48.320
<v Speaker 1>somehow able to port our consciousness what it is that

0:03:48.400 --> 0:03:55.400
<v Speaker 1>makes us us into some sort of electronic mechanical, you know, system.

0:03:55.520 --> 0:03:59.120
<v Speaker 1>So essentially the way most people use shorthand as they say,

0:03:59.120 --> 0:04:03.080
<v Speaker 1>you upload your brain to a computer. Now, there are

0:04:03.080 --> 0:04:05.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of problems with this, chief among them is

0:04:05.680 --> 0:04:09.280
<v Speaker 1>how do you actually get the whatever it is in

0:04:09.320 --> 0:04:12.760
<v Speaker 1>our consciousness that makes us who we are out of

0:04:12.760 --> 0:04:16.040
<v Speaker 1>our minds and into a machine. Yeah. Right, now, there's

0:04:16.080 --> 0:04:18.960
<v Speaker 1>so much that we don't understand about human consciousness in

0:04:18.960 --> 0:04:21.960
<v Speaker 1>the brain that it seems like an impossibility. And there

0:04:21.960 --> 0:04:26.560
<v Speaker 1>may not be any sort of way to to interconnect

0:04:27.040 --> 0:04:30.279
<v Speaker 1>our consciousness with a machine beyond a very surface level.

0:04:30.520 --> 0:04:32.560
<v Speaker 1>So in other words, uh, you might be able to

0:04:32.600 --> 0:04:35.200
<v Speaker 1>interact with a computer with a brain computer interface. We've

0:04:35.240 --> 0:04:38.839
<v Speaker 1>seen those already and they're getting better every year. But

0:04:39.720 --> 0:04:42.400
<v Speaker 1>being able to make a computer do what you want

0:04:42.400 --> 0:04:46.400
<v Speaker 1>by thinking about it and making a transition from your

0:04:46.440 --> 0:04:50.320
<v Speaker 1>body into a computer are huge orders of magnitude apart

0:04:50.360 --> 0:04:52.560
<v Speaker 1>from one another. Yeah, and if the language on this

0:04:52.600 --> 0:04:55.800
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been clear yet. It's worth making a really fine

0:04:55.839 --> 0:05:00.200
<v Speaker 1>distinction on the difference between having a copy of your

0:05:00.200 --> 0:05:03.440
<v Speaker 1>brain in a computer and having that be the thing

0:05:03.560 --> 0:05:06.680
<v Speaker 1>that is currently your experience. Right, So, even if we

0:05:06.720 --> 0:05:09.480
<v Speaker 1>get to a point where we can simulate a human

0:05:09.520 --> 0:05:13.040
<v Speaker 1>brain down to the last luron, imagine they could actually

0:05:13.080 --> 0:05:15.880
<v Speaker 1>copy it. So somebody could go interact with that computer,

0:05:16.000 --> 0:05:19.040
<v Speaker 1>and to them it would be like interacting with you.

0:05:19.360 --> 0:05:23.200
<v Speaker 1>The personality would be identical. However, that computer have the

0:05:23.240 --> 0:05:26.560
<v Speaker 1>experience of interacting with that person. Well, and even even

0:05:26.600 --> 0:05:29.440
<v Speaker 1>if we can't answer that question, we still are bothered

0:05:29.480 --> 0:05:32.080
<v Speaker 1>by the question of well, yeah, okay, so we've got

0:05:32.120 --> 0:05:35.800
<v Speaker 1>a computer copy, but I'm still in my body, right,

0:05:37.480 --> 0:05:41.000
<v Speaker 1>that's it. It's not like it's not like me that

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:44.719
<v Speaker 1>that somehow my own experience of the universe as I

0:05:44.760 --> 0:05:48.120
<v Speaker 1>know it continues on. There's just a copy of me.

0:05:48.160 --> 0:05:50.200
<v Speaker 1>It's almost as if you were to make a physical

0:05:50.240 --> 0:05:53.479
<v Speaker 1>clone of me. If you were to clone me and

0:05:53.520 --> 0:05:56.080
<v Speaker 1>there was a second me there, that second me which

0:05:56.240 --> 0:06:00.160
<v Speaker 1>might have very similar personality traits and actually might not.

0:06:00.240 --> 0:06:03.920
<v Speaker 1>But that's kind of interesting too. But anyway, let's assume

0:06:03.960 --> 0:06:06.400
<v Speaker 1>that somehow it's a perfect copy of me. That doesn't

0:06:06.440 --> 0:06:08.200
<v Speaker 1>mean that if my clone goes out the door and

0:06:08.240 --> 0:06:11.040
<v Speaker 1>talks to someone, I suddenly have that experience of talking

0:06:11.040 --> 0:06:14.359
<v Speaker 1>to that person. That's two totally separate experiences of reality.

0:06:14.800 --> 0:06:19.040
<v Speaker 1>So I still lose it when I die. I'm gone. Well, however,

0:06:19.120 --> 0:06:22.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if that clone has all of your experiences

0:06:22.360 --> 0:06:24.080
<v Speaker 1>up until the point that you die, if it's made

0:06:24.520 --> 0:06:27.080
<v Speaker 1>at your death and then can still go out and

0:06:27.160 --> 0:06:29.880
<v Speaker 1>update Twitter and have all of your memories, then to

0:06:30.800 --> 0:06:34.080
<v Speaker 1>everyone else, I seem alive. To me, I'm still dead. Well,

0:06:34.120 --> 0:06:35.279
<v Speaker 1>but that but how do you How do you know

0:06:35.320 --> 0:06:37.600
<v Speaker 1>that if you're, if you're because your consciousness, if you're

0:06:38.240 --> 0:06:41.120
<v Speaker 1>continues on. But no, no, no, no, it's not my consciousness,

0:06:41.120 --> 0:06:44.359
<v Speaker 1>it's his consciousness. See. That's the problem is that it

0:06:44.440 --> 0:06:47.000
<v Speaker 1>becomes his as soon as that becomes a thing. Same

0:06:47.000 --> 0:06:49.640
<v Speaker 1>thing with the digital model is that there are two

0:06:49.680 --> 0:06:54.280
<v Speaker 1>consciousness is now conscious nigh whatever the plural of consciousness

0:06:54.320 --> 0:06:56.839
<v Speaker 1>would be. But there are two of them and so

0:06:57.040 --> 0:06:59.920
<v Speaker 1>and that's the problem is that they're distinct from one another.

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:01.920
<v Speaker 1>They both are based on the same thing. But this

0:07:01.960 --> 0:07:05.000
<v Speaker 1>is the same problem I have with transporter technology. By

0:07:05.000 --> 0:07:08.160
<v Speaker 1>the way, Yeah, it's essentially cloning. It's breaking down a

0:07:08.240 --> 0:07:11.080
<v Speaker 1>body and then reconstructing it. So every single time anyone

0:07:11.120 --> 0:07:13.840
<v Speaker 1>on Star Trek is using the transporter, and this is

0:07:13.880 --> 0:07:16.800
<v Speaker 1>something that Bones himself points out a couple of times.

0:07:16.840 --> 0:07:20.400
<v Speaker 1>They die and resurrected, but it's it's a copy of

0:07:20.440 --> 0:07:22.920
<v Speaker 1>the person. It's the next generation. Dealt with that in

0:07:22.960 --> 0:07:27.360
<v Speaker 1>a very important episode about Riker, but it wasn't every episode,

0:07:27.360 --> 0:07:29.640
<v Speaker 1>and an important episode about Riker and how he sits

0:07:29.680 --> 0:07:32.120
<v Speaker 1>down in the manliest of ways and every chair he

0:07:32.160 --> 0:07:35.560
<v Speaker 1>comes into contact with. Is he his action man, it's not.

0:07:35.600 --> 0:07:38.800
<v Speaker 1>It's not his faulty. He also walks through doors sideways

0:07:38.800 --> 0:07:41.120
<v Speaker 1>because his shoulders are just far too wide to fit through.

0:07:42.000 --> 0:07:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Uh kid, Jonathan breaks He's a nice guy. I met

0:07:45.240 --> 0:07:48.480
<v Speaker 1>him a couple of times. I love you Jonathan anyway.

0:07:48.560 --> 0:07:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Uh So that but that's a real that's a real

0:07:51.000 --> 0:07:52.720
<v Speaker 1>thing though. That's a real thing in science fiction, and

0:07:52.760 --> 0:07:54.920
<v Speaker 1>it's a real thing. That people have argued is that

0:07:55.560 --> 0:07:59.280
<v Speaker 1>the you could maintain the illusion of immortality that way

0:07:59.320 --> 0:08:02.000
<v Speaker 1>to everyone, to any outside observer, it would be as

0:08:02.040 --> 0:08:05.560
<v Speaker 1>if you were living forever, but you, the actual entity,

0:08:05.760 --> 0:08:09.120
<v Speaker 1>would cease to be upon your death right. That the

0:08:09.480 --> 0:08:12.840
<v Speaker 1>so the new you might have the sense of continuity, right,

0:08:12.920 --> 0:08:15.840
<v Speaker 1>the new you might continue on and it would be

0:08:15.880 --> 0:08:18.640
<v Speaker 1>as if you had actually been transported. It's just that

0:08:18.720 --> 0:08:25.080
<v Speaker 1>your consciousness ends, which not acceptable. We're talking, We're getting

0:08:25.080 --> 0:08:28.120
<v Speaker 1>into a very metaphysical conversation about what it means to

0:08:28.160 --> 0:08:31.119
<v Speaker 1>be conscious and what I mean because I I would

0:08:31.480 --> 0:08:33.280
<v Speaker 1>I would argue the counter. I would argue that if

0:08:33.320 --> 0:08:37.040
<v Speaker 1>if you can wake up in a new body, but

0:08:37.200 --> 0:08:39.120
<v Speaker 1>you're not as all of your memories, you're not waking

0:08:39.200 --> 0:08:41.600
<v Speaker 1>up someone else is waking up with all your memories. No,

0:08:41.760 --> 0:08:43.600
<v Speaker 1>but if it's all of your memories, it's still you,

0:08:43.840 --> 0:08:46.480
<v Speaker 1>but it's not you the person individually, because you both

0:08:46.520 --> 0:08:48.640
<v Speaker 1>exist at the same time, Lauren, If you clone yourself

0:08:48.720 --> 0:08:51.840
<v Speaker 1>right now and your clone walks outside and does stuff,

0:08:51.920 --> 0:08:54.360
<v Speaker 1>you are not going to know what's happening. So your

0:08:54.440 --> 0:08:58.719
<v Speaker 1>consciousness is existing independent. It doesn't matter. But that's that's

0:08:58.760 --> 0:09:05.960
<v Speaker 1>the whole pay We're trying to avoid death, right. Okay, So,

0:09:05.960 --> 0:09:09.640
<v Speaker 1>so digital immortality, we've got a problem with consciousness porting

0:09:09.679 --> 0:09:13.320
<v Speaker 1>and all that aside. But how would digital immortality be

0:09:13.480 --> 0:09:18.360
<v Speaker 1>different from physical immortality? So digital immortality, let's let's say

0:09:18.360 --> 0:09:21.240
<v Speaker 1>that somehow we have reached a point where we actually

0:09:21.360 --> 0:09:25.840
<v Speaker 1>can move a person's consciousness from a physical body into

0:09:25.880 --> 0:09:28.040
<v Speaker 1>a digital construct. I don't know how we did it,

0:09:28.080 --> 0:09:30.960
<v Speaker 1>but somehow we magically found the way. You know, we've

0:09:30.960 --> 0:09:34.000
<v Speaker 1>got the USB port. You just transferred your brain over

0:09:34.200 --> 0:09:38.040
<v Speaker 1>USB sevn D three and uh it went really quickly.

0:09:38.440 --> 0:09:41.559
<v Speaker 1>And then you're seeing from this computer. That's where your

0:09:41.760 --> 0:09:44.839
<v Speaker 1>your consciousness has now been transported into a computer, whether

0:09:44.880 --> 0:09:48.080
<v Speaker 1>that computer is a giant mainframe, or it's inside a

0:09:48.160 --> 0:09:51.800
<v Speaker 1>robotic body, or it's some sort of weird free form

0:09:52.000 --> 0:09:55.120
<v Speaker 1>literal cloud computing. Because we've gone so far that nanotechnology

0:09:55.120 --> 0:09:57.320
<v Speaker 1>has taken. Okay, I I put in right now for

0:09:57.440 --> 0:10:01.000
<v Speaker 1>electronic jellyfish, electronic jellyfish from I'm just gonna say goo

0:10:01.440 --> 0:10:05.959
<v Speaker 1>like magic, Google magic, goof for Joe personally, I want

0:10:06.000 --> 0:10:11.480
<v Speaker 1>a flame breathing unicorna but that's close enough. A lama

0:10:11.480 --> 0:10:15.000
<v Speaker 1>in a unicorn. Our world's apart. But anyway, so, so

0:10:15.120 --> 0:10:18.120
<v Speaker 1>all right, we we've reached that point. In this case,

0:10:18.120 --> 0:10:21.280
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about a continuing consciousness. But there's you. You

0:10:21.320 --> 0:10:25.040
<v Speaker 1>are separated from what was your body, right you are

0:10:25.040 --> 0:10:27.520
<v Speaker 1>not now you might be able in this weird science

0:10:27.559 --> 0:10:30.600
<v Speaker 1>fiction world, to reconstruct your body in some way so

0:10:30.640 --> 0:10:34.240
<v Speaker 1>that you can at least continue the experience of going

0:10:34.280 --> 0:10:37.880
<v Speaker 1>through the world as if you were in a human body.

0:10:38.160 --> 0:10:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Can change mind to mechanical shark, mechanical shark body, you're

0:10:41.960 --> 0:10:45.720
<v Speaker 1>in goo. You can take whatever form you want, all right,

0:10:46.080 --> 0:10:48.440
<v Speaker 1>But the point being that, you know, if you could

0:10:48.880 --> 0:10:51.240
<v Speaker 1>support your brain so that you could be in a

0:10:51.320 --> 0:10:54.160
<v Speaker 1>digital format, you would not be limited to the human

0:10:54.240 --> 0:10:56.920
<v Speaker 1>experience anymore. Uh. There are a lot of other questions

0:10:56.960 --> 0:10:59.199
<v Speaker 1>that happened, Like what happens if you were to upload

0:10:59.480 --> 0:11:02.920
<v Speaker 1>to justness? Is this this is to the same computer?

0:11:03.480 --> 0:11:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Then would they merge in some way? What happens if

0:11:06.320 --> 0:11:09.400
<v Speaker 1>we were to port the entire human race into some

0:11:09.440 --> 0:11:12.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of digital format. What happens with reproduction? Would we

0:11:12.840 --> 0:11:16.680
<v Speaker 1>actually be able to create brand new digital life forms

0:11:16.720 --> 0:11:21.520
<v Speaker 1>that never once we're inside a human body? Uh? Again,

0:11:21.640 --> 0:11:24.560
<v Speaker 1>I think all this is pure science fiction. I don't

0:11:24.600 --> 0:11:26.960
<v Speaker 1>see us ever getting there. But these are kind of

0:11:27.000 --> 0:11:29.679
<v Speaker 1>those cool science fiction e like ideas that you get

0:11:29.679 --> 0:11:32.480
<v Speaker 1>when you're yeah, yeah, yeah, it's are we going to

0:11:32.520 --> 0:11:34.679
<v Speaker 1>be the borg? Like would we have a shared consciousness

0:11:34.720 --> 0:11:36.920
<v Speaker 1>at that point? Or uh, you know, would it be

0:11:37.120 --> 0:11:39.640
<v Speaker 1>would the human race essentially become a giant ant colony,

0:11:40.200 --> 0:11:43.840
<v Speaker 1>like every single consciousness actually becomes more like an individual

0:11:43.880 --> 0:11:48.640
<v Speaker 1>neuron in a giant hive brain. Um. I honest, again,

0:11:48.679 --> 0:11:50.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we're ever going to get there, So

0:11:50.200 --> 0:11:53.040
<v Speaker 1>it's almost a moot discussion in my mind. But you know,

0:11:53.120 --> 0:11:56.880
<v Speaker 1>I could be totally wrong. Well, so it does seem

0:11:56.960 --> 0:12:01.160
<v Speaker 1>to me that it's slightly more probable that we will

0:12:01.200 --> 0:12:05.679
<v Speaker 1>achieve something like a physical immortality. And again to clarify,

0:12:05.800 --> 0:12:10.120
<v Speaker 1>not in vulnerability, but conquering aging because we can actually

0:12:10.360 --> 0:12:14.040
<v Speaker 1>zero in on what aging is. Yeah, and uh, and

0:12:14.080 --> 0:12:17.120
<v Speaker 1>if we zero in on the genes that govern aging

0:12:17.160 --> 0:12:21.360
<v Speaker 1>to a point where we can uh make meaningful decisions

0:12:21.520 --> 0:12:26.280
<v Speaker 1>so that we counteract the aging process, we could indefinitely

0:12:26.440 --> 0:12:29.200
<v Speaker 1>halt aging. Now, these are all a lot of ifs,

0:12:29.200 --> 0:12:31.720
<v Speaker 1>and on the scientific level, I think all of that

0:12:31.800 --> 0:12:35.880
<v Speaker 1>is achievable. Um, I don't. I don't think there's anything

0:12:36.000 --> 0:12:40.439
<v Speaker 1>fundamentally uh that would be a fundamental barrier to that.

0:12:41.040 --> 0:12:43.640
<v Speaker 1>But I do think that in order for that to happen,

0:12:44.040 --> 0:12:47.160
<v Speaker 1>there'll be a lot of hurdles to overcome. However, I

0:12:47.200 --> 0:12:51.199
<v Speaker 1>do think that between the two major roads, digital immortality

0:12:51.320 --> 0:12:54.079
<v Speaker 1>or conquering aging. I think the aging one is the

0:12:54.080 --> 0:12:57.200
<v Speaker 1>one that's actually more plausible. It looks it looks more

0:12:57.240 --> 0:12:58.920
<v Speaker 1>likely right now. I mean, we already know that the

0:12:59.280 --> 0:13:01.719
<v Speaker 1>hey flick limb it um, which is which is the

0:13:02.000 --> 0:13:06.280
<v Speaker 1>limited which cells stop dividing and go through a programmed

0:13:06.280 --> 0:13:08.959
<v Speaker 1>cell death. Uh, we know what that is. We know

0:13:09.200 --> 0:13:12.440
<v Speaker 1>that there's a protein um telomerase that has to do

0:13:12.559 --> 0:13:15.600
<v Speaker 1>with with with triggering that and that if you can

0:13:15.640 --> 0:13:23.120
<v Speaker 1>remove that limit, then stuff like cancer cells don't have that.

0:13:23.240 --> 0:13:24.920
<v Speaker 1>So I mean, you know, we we've already looked at

0:13:24.960 --> 0:13:27.600
<v Speaker 1>it and said, hey, that thing, it's just yeah, yeah,

0:13:27.640 --> 0:13:30.600
<v Speaker 1>this is an idea where uh well, like like the

0:13:30.640 --> 0:13:33.320
<v Speaker 1>idea that you know, you have the the caps on

0:13:33.360 --> 0:13:37.079
<v Speaker 1>the end of uh, genetic material, the telomeres, right that

0:13:37.160 --> 0:13:39.480
<v Speaker 1>get a little shorter every time the cell divides, and

0:13:39.520 --> 0:13:41.840
<v Speaker 1>once they get down to the end, that's pretty much

0:13:42.320 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 1>game over for that cell um. If we were able

0:13:44.920 --> 0:13:48.920
<v Speaker 1>to reverse that process or halt that process, then in theory,

0:13:49.000 --> 0:13:53.640
<v Speaker 1>we would be able to to hold off death indefinitely.

0:13:54.040 --> 0:13:57.640
<v Speaker 1>And we've seen experiments like this in h on the

0:13:57.679 --> 0:14:02.200
<v Speaker 1>cellular level, but not anything that's human as far as

0:14:02.240 --> 0:14:04.839
<v Speaker 1>we know. I mean, there are some conspiracy theorists out

0:14:04.840 --> 0:14:07.439
<v Speaker 1>there who believe that there are folks who are already

0:14:07.480 --> 0:14:11.319
<v Speaker 1>in possession of this immortality, but for fear of the

0:14:11.400 --> 0:14:16.760
<v Speaker 1>mass of of of the unwashed, charging with pitchforks and

0:14:16.880 --> 0:14:20.760
<v Speaker 1>pistols in hand, they have not revealed their immortal status.

0:14:21.440 --> 0:14:24.360
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps they even glitter in sunlight. I do not know,

0:14:25.000 --> 0:14:29.880
<v Speaker 1>but I don't hold those conspiracy theories in in. I'm

0:14:29.920 --> 0:14:33.520
<v Speaker 1>skeptical all of them. Let's say that I'm quite skeptical too,

0:14:33.560 --> 0:14:37.720
<v Speaker 1>but I don't think part of that idea is unreasonable,

0:14:37.800 --> 0:14:42.200
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily that somebody has actually figured this out. But uh,

0:14:42.320 --> 0:14:45.880
<v Speaker 1>let me introduce a little thought experiment. So imagine you

0:14:46.160 --> 0:14:49.840
<v Speaker 1>discover the cure to a disease, you know, like polio.

0:14:50.040 --> 0:14:52.520
<v Speaker 1>You know you were the discoverer of the polio vaccine.

0:14:53.720 --> 0:14:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Do you have a moral duty to share that knowledge

0:14:59.160 --> 0:15:01.080
<v Speaker 1>of how to create that vaccine with the rest of

0:15:01.080 --> 0:15:04.920
<v Speaker 1>the world. I would say yes, Like you have an obligion,

0:15:04.960 --> 0:15:07.760
<v Speaker 1>I would say. I would say ethically, not morally, but yes.

0:15:08.600 --> 0:15:11.240
<v Speaker 1>But I just make that distinction between ethics and morality

0:15:11.320 --> 0:15:16.440
<v Speaker 1>because I think morality suggests there's a specific belief system

0:15:16.480 --> 0:15:22.760
<v Speaker 1>that is usually tied to religious affiliation, But I think

0:15:22.800 --> 0:15:27.920
<v Speaker 1>ethically you would certainly be expected to share that. Yeah,

0:15:27.920 --> 0:15:33.400
<v Speaker 1>semantic distinctions, you would have an ethical responsibility. Would you

0:15:33.520 --> 0:15:36.640
<v Speaker 1>have the same responsibility if what you discovered was the

0:15:36.720 --> 0:15:41.400
<v Speaker 1>cure to aging? I and just intuitively don't feel that

0:15:41.440 --> 0:15:45.760
<v Speaker 1>you necessarily would. I think that that's a tougher question. Well,

0:15:45.840 --> 0:15:51.840
<v Speaker 1>it's certainly if we were to somehow discover with irrefutable

0:15:51.840 --> 0:15:56.320
<v Speaker 1>proof that we had found a way too safely stop

0:15:56.400 --> 0:16:00.360
<v Speaker 1>the aging process, and we were to just spontane eviously

0:16:00.440 --> 0:16:04.400
<v Speaker 1>roll that out throughout the entire human population, there would

0:16:04.400 --> 0:16:09.000
<v Speaker 1>clearly be some massive consequences we would have to deal with,

0:16:09.120 --> 0:16:14.120
<v Speaker 1>and I honestly think that, uh, we would really have

0:16:14.280 --> 0:16:18.920
<v Speaker 1>to think about, discuss consider the consequences of those actions

0:16:19.000 --> 0:16:24.120
<v Speaker 1>before rolling that out. So I think that while this

0:16:24.120 --> 0:16:28.480
<v Speaker 1>this conversation is largely philosophical, uh, it's it's an important one.

0:16:28.720 --> 0:16:31.000
<v Speaker 1>And I think in order for us to ever get

0:16:31.040 --> 0:16:34.600
<v Speaker 1>to a future where we do actually roll out some

0:16:34.720 --> 0:16:37.880
<v Speaker 1>form of of defeating the whole aging process, we have

0:16:37.960 --> 0:16:40.400
<v Speaker 1>to have these conversations now, because if we don't, we're

0:16:40.400 --> 0:16:44.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna be dealing with some ugly consequences further down the road. Yeah. Yeah,

0:16:45.160 --> 0:16:47.880
<v Speaker 1>it more depends on on a bunch of other ethical

0:16:47.920 --> 0:16:52.200
<v Speaker 1>considerations that are brought up if the possibility of of

0:16:52.280 --> 0:16:56.960
<v Speaker 1>this longevity becomes real. So for example, like, uh, you know,

0:16:57.040 --> 0:17:00.600
<v Speaker 1>there's there's the idea that we talked about this in

0:17:00.640 --> 0:17:03.640
<v Speaker 1>another episode of forward Thinking, the idea that there's a

0:17:03.680 --> 0:17:08.159
<v Speaker 1>capacity that any particular region has to support life on it,

0:17:08.359 --> 0:17:11.719
<v Speaker 1>a particular type of life, right like, and once you

0:17:11.920 --> 0:17:17.480
<v Speaker 1>once you exceed that, you've actually gone beyond the capacity

0:17:17.520 --> 0:17:19.800
<v Speaker 1>of that area to support that life, then you have

0:17:20.080 --> 0:17:23.600
<v Speaker 1>massive die offs. So you're saying, like, imagine we we

0:17:23.760 --> 0:17:27.919
<v Speaker 1>keep breeding, but we mostly stop dying, right So in

0:17:27.960 --> 0:17:31.760
<v Speaker 1>other words, uh, there's a question is it does it

0:17:31.840 --> 0:17:38.280
<v Speaker 1>become unethical to h to reproduce if you are creating

0:17:38.320 --> 0:17:41.720
<v Speaker 1>a greater burden on the entire planet to provide the

0:17:41.720 --> 0:17:45.879
<v Speaker 1>resources necessary for everyone to continue to survive. Then there's

0:17:45.960 --> 0:17:47.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean that that's and is it for the more

0:17:47.760 --> 0:17:50.320
<v Speaker 1>ethical to tell people that they can't reproduce? Is is

0:17:50.440 --> 0:17:55.520
<v Speaker 1>removing that capacity, you know, violating basic human rights? Right?

0:17:55.800 --> 0:18:00.160
<v Speaker 1>Do you therefore make a distinction and say any who

0:18:00.160 --> 0:18:03.439
<v Speaker 1>wants to reproduce, that's fine. You don't get the magic

0:18:03.480 --> 0:18:06.000
<v Speaker 1>serum that keeps you alive forever, and then what would

0:18:06.160 --> 0:18:08.639
<v Speaker 1>what would most people choose? And then on the on

0:18:08.720 --> 0:18:10.600
<v Speaker 1>top of that, you've got the question of if it's

0:18:10.640 --> 0:18:13.560
<v Speaker 1>a if it's a private company that comes up with

0:18:13.680 --> 0:18:17.879
<v Speaker 1>this this approach like they've got gene therapy that will

0:18:18.400 --> 0:18:22.159
<v Speaker 1>um conquer aging uh, And it's a private company, and

0:18:22.200 --> 0:18:25.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, private companies exist in order to make a profit.

0:18:26.000 --> 0:18:29.760
<v Speaker 1>That's the business. That's ultimately what the goal is. Now,

0:18:29.760 --> 0:18:31.320
<v Speaker 1>there are different ways of going about it, and you

0:18:31.359 --> 0:18:33.439
<v Speaker 1>can do it in ethical ways, you can do it

0:18:33.480 --> 0:18:36.280
<v Speaker 1>in unethical ways, but that's really beside the point. The

0:18:36.280 --> 0:18:38.840
<v Speaker 1>whole purpose of a business is to make money. That's

0:18:38.960 --> 0:18:42.359
<v Speaker 1>why they exist. So if you have a business that

0:18:42.520 --> 0:18:45.920
<v Speaker 1>comes up with this plan, um, what happens when how

0:18:45.920 --> 0:18:48.800
<v Speaker 1>do you set your price? Like you've got something that

0:18:48.880 --> 0:18:52.000
<v Speaker 1>you know lots of people are going to want, Maybe

0:18:52.040 --> 0:18:54.560
<v Speaker 1>not everyone. There might be people out there who have

0:18:54.640 --> 0:18:57.960
<v Speaker 1>no interest in living forever. They don't they think for

0:18:58.080 --> 0:19:00.840
<v Speaker 1>whatever reason that that is not for them. Well, I'd

0:19:00.840 --> 0:19:04.520
<v Speaker 1>imagine there's a huge middle category. I'd probably include myself

0:19:04.520 --> 0:19:06.880
<v Speaker 1>in this that would probably like to live a good

0:19:06.880 --> 0:19:10.639
<v Speaker 1>bit longer than people usually naturally live, but would really

0:19:10.680 --> 0:19:14.600
<v Speaker 1>probably not like to live forever, right, right, So well,

0:19:14.640 --> 0:19:17.760
<v Speaker 1>and and there's you know, well, first of all, we're

0:19:17.760 --> 0:19:23.000
<v Speaker 1>talking about prolonging life indefinitely, but that does not necessarily

0:19:23.040 --> 0:19:26.720
<v Speaker 1>mean well, I mean we're talking about a practical forever.

0:19:26.760 --> 0:19:29.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, obviously we're not going to billions of years

0:19:29.640 --> 0:19:32.840
<v Speaker 1>until keep death of the Unix. Just a bunch of

0:19:32.880 --> 0:19:36.359
<v Speaker 1>us sitting there going, well that was something, wasn't you know?

0:19:36.440 --> 0:19:41.760
<v Speaker 1>But but right, so so let's just let's say, uh,

0:19:41.880 --> 0:19:45.240
<v Speaker 1>five hundred thousand years. I mean, yeah, that's I'd like

0:19:45.280 --> 0:19:48.640
<v Speaker 1>to I'd like to live longer than I probably naturally will,

0:19:48.680 --> 0:19:50.640
<v Speaker 1>but I don't want to live five hundred thousand years.

0:19:50.640 --> 0:19:52.880
<v Speaker 1>That's fair, And that's a good question. Maybe maybe maybe

0:19:52.920 --> 0:19:55.000
<v Speaker 1>you get you get seven eight hundred years into it,

0:19:55.000 --> 0:19:56.440
<v Speaker 1>and you go and you know, this is pretty cool.

0:19:57.560 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 1>That's true. You can't really predict. But then maybe seven

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:03.520
<v Speaker 1>hundred hundred years after that, you're like, I'm done at

0:20:03.600 --> 0:20:08.080
<v Speaker 1>last five years was a bear? You know, you don't know,

0:20:08.359 --> 0:20:10.440
<v Speaker 1>you don't know. But but here's here's the things that

0:20:10.440 --> 0:20:13.239
<v Speaker 1>that's a good question. I mean, would you would that

0:20:13.280 --> 0:20:15.080
<v Speaker 1>mean if we if we get to a point where

0:20:15.200 --> 0:20:20.640
<v Speaker 1>people were able to achieve immortality. Would um, would suicide

0:20:21.200 --> 0:20:26.080
<v Speaker 1>be a permissible thing in this society where someone has

0:20:26.080 --> 0:20:29.959
<v Speaker 1>felt that they have lived long enough and they do

0:20:30.040 --> 0:20:32.760
<v Speaker 1>not wish to continue living if it's if it's something

0:20:32.800 --> 0:20:36.840
<v Speaker 1>that requires uh, you know, periodic treatments. I can imagine

0:20:36.880 --> 0:20:41.000
<v Speaker 1>a world where if you are able to demonstrate this

0:20:41.000 --> 0:20:42.639
<v Speaker 1>This is a weird concept, but if you're able to

0:20:42.640 --> 0:20:45.840
<v Speaker 1>demonstrate that you are mentally sound, that you would halt

0:20:46.160 --> 0:20:49.000
<v Speaker 1>those treatments and allow the aging process to continue. Can

0:20:49.000 --> 0:20:51.800
<v Speaker 1>you imagine that where I'm sorry, you're not You're not

0:20:51.880 --> 0:20:55.280
<v Speaker 1>mentally capable, so we have to keep you alive indefinitely.

0:20:55.920 --> 0:20:59.600
<v Speaker 1>That's kind of an interesting, but but possible future. This

0:20:59.640 --> 0:21:03.840
<v Speaker 1>converse station introduces such a weird instability in the way

0:21:03.840 --> 0:21:06.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm viewing humans. I had the question popped into my mind, like,

0:21:07.320 --> 0:21:10.400
<v Speaker 1>would be would mental soundness still be the same thing

0:21:10.440 --> 0:21:13.040
<v Speaker 1>in this world? I mean, that's how fundamentally I feel

0:21:13.119 --> 0:21:15.960
<v Speaker 1>this would alter the human experience. So like, if someone

0:21:16.080 --> 0:21:18.040
<v Speaker 1>said that they no longer wish to live, would that

0:21:18.080 --> 0:21:21.560
<v Speaker 1>person be viewed as truly crazy? Yeah? Well, I mean

0:21:21.600 --> 0:21:24.159
<v Speaker 1>can and can you imagine? I mean, because losses is

0:21:24.200 --> 0:21:27.200
<v Speaker 1>a big scary part of our lives right now. Can

0:21:27.200 --> 0:21:32.200
<v Speaker 1>you imagine losing someone that you've known for eight hundred years? Yeah, yeah,

0:21:32.280 --> 0:21:38.439
<v Speaker 1>I can imagine wanting to know just just just just

0:21:38.520 --> 0:21:42.280
<v Speaker 1>how to relationships work at that point, you know how? Right?

0:21:42.320 --> 0:21:44.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean that there are a lot of I mean

0:21:44.320 --> 0:21:47.760
<v Speaker 1>fundamental questions about what it is to have the human experience.

0:21:47.920 --> 0:21:50.480
<v Speaker 1>That's another question is if you were able to do this,

0:21:50.560 --> 0:21:53.240
<v Speaker 1>would it mean that you were no longer actually human

0:21:54.000 --> 0:21:57.239
<v Speaker 1>at least as the way, not not from a you know,

0:21:58.320 --> 0:22:03.399
<v Speaker 1>necessarily from the genetically, but from an experience from what

0:22:03.600 --> 0:22:06.760
<v Speaker 1>from what? If a human condition depends upon death, then

0:22:07.240 --> 0:22:10.120
<v Speaker 1>by defeating death are we human? And and which which

0:22:10.160 --> 0:22:13.160
<v Speaker 1>also gets into the questions of spirituality. I mean, because

0:22:13.320 --> 0:22:17.800
<v Speaker 1>most lots of religions um base a lot of their

0:22:17.800 --> 0:22:21.880
<v Speaker 1>philosophy on what happens after you die. If you don't die,

0:22:22.080 --> 0:22:24.000
<v Speaker 1>then then you know, then what does that mean? What

0:22:24.040 --> 0:22:26.800
<v Speaker 1>are you? You know? If God has a plan for us,

0:22:27.080 --> 0:22:29.840
<v Speaker 1>what does that mean? If if reincarnation is the road

0:22:29.960 --> 0:22:33.159
<v Speaker 1>to um enlightenment, then what does that mean? Right? I

0:22:33.200 --> 0:22:36.040
<v Speaker 1>can imagine one way that that might be dealt with

0:22:36.200 --> 0:22:39.800
<v Speaker 1>is just purely practically, like if if you want to

0:22:39.800 --> 0:22:44.560
<v Speaker 1>talk about heaven and hell, or other versions of afterlife. Um,

0:22:44.600 --> 0:22:47.040
<v Speaker 1>you could merely fall back on the fact that, well,

0:22:47.080 --> 0:22:50.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this isn't going to mean actual immortality, so

0:22:50.840 --> 0:22:54.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe it takes you a hundred thousand years to uh

0:22:54.440 --> 0:22:57.560
<v Speaker 1>face your judgment or whatever. But I think that will happen.

0:22:57.640 --> 0:23:00.440
<v Speaker 1>I think it would widely. It would wide be very

0:23:00.480 --> 0:23:05.120
<v Speaker 1>depending upon the various religious faiths out there. Obviously, Yeah,

0:23:05.240 --> 0:23:10.320
<v Speaker 1>so there'd be some that would probably uh embrace this,

0:23:10.400 --> 0:23:12.480
<v Speaker 1>and there'd be some that might say, you know, this

0:23:12.600 --> 0:23:16.959
<v Speaker 1>is not right, uh, And I think I can't imagine

0:23:17.000 --> 0:23:19.800
<v Speaker 1>a world where this would really become compulsory. In fact,

0:23:19.920 --> 0:23:22.320
<v Speaker 1>I can I can much more imagine a word. Well,

0:23:22.520 --> 0:23:25.240
<v Speaker 1>you say, of course, but we're talking about a world

0:23:25.240 --> 0:23:27.359
<v Speaker 1>where people don't die. We might as well go ahead

0:23:27.359 --> 0:23:29.920
<v Speaker 1>and go so far as to say that might not necessary.

0:23:29.960 --> 0:23:35.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I can't imagine that compulsory immortality would be sustainable.

0:23:35.200 --> 0:23:38.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean that would be that would sort of for

0:23:38.520 --> 0:23:42.240
<v Speaker 1>that that would foreclose on humanity too quickly to be

0:23:42.400 --> 0:23:43.919
<v Speaker 1>now I can I I can see it, though. I

0:23:43.920 --> 0:23:45.880
<v Speaker 1>can see someone like we were saying a minute ago,

0:23:45.920 --> 0:23:47.720
<v Speaker 1>like if if you don't want to live forever, what's

0:23:47.760 --> 0:23:49.520
<v Speaker 1>wrong with you? You're probably you need to be a

0:23:49.600 --> 0:23:51.280
<v Speaker 1>ward of the state. You need to be protected from

0:23:51.280 --> 0:23:53.439
<v Speaker 1>yourself because you want to die. And how weird is that?

0:23:53.560 --> 0:23:55.919
<v Speaker 1>So let's and let's say that there is some sort

0:23:56.080 --> 0:24:03.080
<v Speaker 1>of system in place to to guide reproduction. What happens

0:24:03.119 --> 0:24:07.320
<v Speaker 1>when two people reproduces the baby immediately treated so or

0:24:07.359 --> 0:24:12.440
<v Speaker 1>even treated before born to not age after a certain amount? Uh,

0:24:12.720 --> 0:24:15.520
<v Speaker 1>does the baby get any say in that? It's I mean,

0:24:15.600 --> 0:24:18.160
<v Speaker 1>they're they're weird questions, but these are things that actually

0:24:18.160 --> 0:24:20.280
<v Speaker 1>pop up. And when you start having this discussion, I

0:24:20.320 --> 0:24:23.360
<v Speaker 1>had one pop into my mind. Sure, this is kind

0:24:23.400 --> 0:24:26.520
<v Speaker 1>of a weird concern, but it actually it seems very grave.

0:24:27.200 --> 0:24:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Imagine you get to the points where where pretty much

0:24:30.920 --> 0:24:35.840
<v Speaker 1>everybody has access to this um you can stop aging.

0:24:36.160 --> 0:24:40.720
<v Speaker 1>How would that change ideas of punishment? Sure, let's say

0:24:40.760 --> 0:24:43.600
<v Speaker 1>that you live in a state which does not have

0:24:43.720 --> 0:24:46.639
<v Speaker 1>the death penalty but will give you life in prison

0:24:46.720 --> 0:24:49.840
<v Speaker 1>for a horrible crime, and you get convicted of that crime.

0:24:50.160 --> 0:24:52.840
<v Speaker 1>What does your life in prison mean? Does that mean

0:24:53.000 --> 0:24:55.720
<v Speaker 1>you go to prison for five dred thousand years or

0:24:55.760 --> 0:24:59.320
<v Speaker 1>however long you live, or I mean, how how would

0:24:59.320 --> 0:25:03.760
<v Speaker 1>that change idea of what punishment is? Also, before you

0:25:03.800 --> 0:25:07.520
<v Speaker 1>even get to to what punishment means? How would what

0:25:07.680 --> 0:25:10.040
<v Speaker 1>would people still enact in criminal behavior if they were

0:25:10.040 --> 0:25:12.560
<v Speaker 1>going to live forever? If your permanent record lasts five

0:25:12.960 --> 0:25:15.080
<v Speaker 1>thousand years, are you going to blemish it? Are you

0:25:15.119 --> 0:25:16.600
<v Speaker 1>going to be more likely or less? Like, I think

0:25:16.600 --> 0:25:18.280
<v Speaker 1>there's always going to be people who are going to

0:25:19.000 --> 0:25:22.360
<v Speaker 1>act in in whatever way gives them the greatest advantage,

0:25:22.400 --> 0:25:26.720
<v Speaker 1>and regardless of whether it's legal or not. Also, I mean,

0:25:26.720 --> 0:25:29.360
<v Speaker 1>if you get to first assuming that we still have

0:25:29.960 --> 0:25:31.840
<v Speaker 1>the same sort of emotions that we do now, and

0:25:31.880 --> 0:25:35.360
<v Speaker 1>I see no reason to assume otherwise, you're still going

0:25:35.400 --> 0:25:39.159
<v Speaker 1>to have interpersonal conflict passion, Oh yeah, lead to like

0:25:39.240 --> 0:25:42.440
<v Speaker 1>think about murder in a world where people would otherwise

0:25:42.480 --> 0:25:46.399
<v Speaker 1>live forever, How how do you punish that? You know,

0:25:46.440 --> 0:25:48.399
<v Speaker 1>when you think not only what not only did this

0:25:48.440 --> 0:25:51.600
<v Speaker 1>person have so much, so much more to do, they

0:25:51.600 --> 0:25:55.600
<v Speaker 1>had so much more to do indefinitely. Yeah, I mean

0:25:55.640 --> 0:25:58.760
<v Speaker 1>that's you know, we had a discussion before we actually

0:25:58.760 --> 0:26:02.560
<v Speaker 1>started recording where I propose the idea that if if

0:26:02.600 --> 0:26:06.560
<v Speaker 1>this is something that requires periodic treatments so that you

0:26:06.600 --> 0:26:11.720
<v Speaker 1>continue to live forever, then what happens would uh would

0:26:11.720 --> 0:26:16.320
<v Speaker 1>a prison sentence? That's for life also include the you know,

0:26:16.440 --> 0:26:20.480
<v Speaker 1>interruption of those treatments, and in a weird way sort

0:26:20.520 --> 0:26:23.280
<v Speaker 1>of amount to a kind of indirect death penel. Right,

0:26:23.560 --> 0:26:26.320
<v Speaker 1>instead of instead of directly killing someone, you're allowing them

0:26:26.359 --> 0:26:30.159
<v Speaker 1>to die. And that's a very tiny distinction. Personally, I

0:26:30.160 --> 0:26:33.840
<v Speaker 1>don't see any real difference between throwing a switch and

0:26:33.920 --> 0:26:36.320
<v Speaker 1>allowing someone to die. But from a very from a

0:26:36.400 --> 0:26:39.240
<v Speaker 1>legal perspective, there could be a world of difference because

0:26:39.800 --> 0:26:43.520
<v Speaker 1>legality and rationality don't necessarily go hand in hand. Plus,

0:26:43.560 --> 0:26:46.480
<v Speaker 1>my definition of rationality could be very different from someone else's.

0:26:47.600 --> 0:26:49.399
<v Speaker 1>On top of that, you know I mentioned before, you're

0:26:49.400 --> 0:26:52.840
<v Speaker 1>talking about the possibility of the private company. Um, this

0:26:52.880 --> 0:26:56.879
<v Speaker 1>could lead to a world of haves and have nots.

0:26:56.960 --> 0:27:01.119
<v Speaker 1>That is hard to imagine. I mean, you know, I

0:27:01.160 --> 0:27:03.840
<v Speaker 1>mean it could act upon the world that is already

0:27:03.880 --> 0:27:05.960
<v Speaker 1>of haves and have nots in a way that makes

0:27:06.040 --> 0:27:11.679
<v Speaker 1>the distinction or makes that completely even worse than it

0:27:11.720 --> 0:27:14.960
<v Speaker 1>is now. Yeah, to the to the absolute extreme where

0:27:15.000 --> 0:27:21.520
<v Speaker 1>you have a very very wealthy, tiny percentage of humanity,

0:27:21.640 --> 0:27:24.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe less than a fraction of a percent of all

0:27:24.680 --> 0:27:28.760
<v Speaker 1>of humanity that can afford this, uh, and then everyone

0:27:28.800 --> 0:27:32.679
<v Speaker 1>else can't, so can you imagine the social disruption that

0:27:32.720 --> 0:27:35.480
<v Speaker 1>would result in that. I mean, now you will in

0:27:35.640 --> 0:27:40.240
<v Speaker 1>just the inherent unfairness well, and that which would lead

0:27:40.240 --> 0:27:43.159
<v Speaker 1>to the social But yeah, I mean now, granted, like

0:27:43.200 --> 0:27:45.800
<v Speaker 1>I said, they're going to be people I think who

0:27:46.200 --> 0:27:49.040
<v Speaker 1>will look at this and say, you know, this really

0:27:49.080 --> 0:27:52.000
<v Speaker 1>isn't what I want. I don't want to live forever.

0:27:52.040 --> 0:27:56.200
<v Speaker 1>That's not I don't place value in that. And uh,

0:27:56.400 --> 0:27:58.479
<v Speaker 1>and for those people it may be that you know

0:27:58.520 --> 0:28:02.080
<v Speaker 1>that they will experience it's whatever social disruption there is,

0:28:02.160 --> 0:28:05.520
<v Speaker 1>but they won't be taking an active role in it. Uh.

0:28:05.600 --> 0:28:09.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what percentage of people would long for immortality.

0:28:09.119 --> 0:28:12.800
<v Speaker 1>I suspect it's a fairly large one. But that also,

0:28:12.880 --> 0:28:15.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at this from a very privileged perspective as well.

0:28:16.520 --> 0:28:20.280
<v Speaker 1>My life is pretty amazing and awesome, and so when

0:28:20.320 --> 0:28:23.280
<v Speaker 1>I take that into account and I think what I

0:28:23.320 --> 0:28:25.680
<v Speaker 1>want to live forever, I'm thinking, well, you know, look

0:28:25.680 --> 0:28:27.720
<v Speaker 1>how amazing my life is. I don't want this to

0:28:27.760 --> 0:28:30.960
<v Speaker 1>go away. But then I don't live in a condition

0:28:31.000 --> 0:28:34.919
<v Speaker 1>where I would be thinking this is what I have

0:28:35.119 --> 0:28:39.920
<v Speaker 1>to live through and I have to live through it forever. Yeah,

0:28:40.000 --> 0:28:43.120
<v Speaker 1>but then again, you you probably wouldn't assume that people

0:28:43.120 --> 0:28:46.440
<v Speaker 1>would like want to die. I mean, I'd say the

0:28:46.480 --> 0:28:51.640
<v Speaker 1>desire to stay alive is is a nearly universal and

0:28:52.120 --> 0:28:54.120
<v Speaker 1>if you had, if you had an infinite period of time,

0:28:54.160 --> 0:28:56.520
<v Speaker 1>then you could grow your wealth and you could better yourself,

0:28:56.520 --> 0:28:58.640
<v Speaker 1>and you could but you could get to a position

0:28:58.680 --> 0:29:02.440
<v Speaker 1>that you weren't. The question becomes what would would we

0:29:02.520 --> 0:29:06.920
<v Speaker 1>do enough to improve the lives of everyone instead of

0:29:06.960 --> 0:29:09.080
<v Speaker 1>just the few who would have access to this. I mean,

0:29:09.400 --> 0:29:11.640
<v Speaker 1>even if we go into let's let's look at it

0:29:11.720 --> 0:29:14.040
<v Speaker 1>as saying we're going to be in an altruistic future

0:29:14.120 --> 0:29:18.880
<v Speaker 1>where whatever company or organization comes up with this shares

0:29:18.920 --> 0:29:23.360
<v Speaker 1>it fairly uh generously, that's rollout is still going to

0:29:23.400 --> 0:29:26.960
<v Speaker 1>be fairly gradual, at least at first, and that alone

0:29:27.040 --> 0:29:29.080
<v Speaker 1>is going to cause problems, which is why some people

0:29:29.120 --> 0:29:31.920
<v Speaker 1>are suggesting that this could already be happening and therefore

0:29:32.000 --> 0:29:33.720
<v Speaker 1>you know it's a secret, because if it weren't a secret,

0:29:33.720 --> 0:29:37.520
<v Speaker 1>people with good nuts. Um. But then when you look

0:29:37.560 --> 0:29:41.320
<v Speaker 1>at parts of the world that are really uh impoverished,

0:29:42.000 --> 0:29:46.600
<v Speaker 1>that have already are lacking for very basic resources, that

0:29:46.840 --> 0:29:51.960
<v Speaker 1>are in in areas of high conflict, how do you

0:29:52.040 --> 0:29:56.040
<v Speaker 1>extend this to those areas, right, how do you how

0:29:56.080 --> 0:29:58.560
<v Speaker 1>do you if or do you not? And if you don't,

0:29:58.600 --> 0:30:01.680
<v Speaker 1>are you essentially telling these people you have to die?

0:30:01.880 --> 0:30:06.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, these are weird, tough questions that arise from

0:30:06.200 --> 0:30:09.320
<v Speaker 1>this concept. I had another question, sure, do we have

0:30:09.360 --> 0:30:14.200
<v Speaker 1>an inherent ethical responsibility to reproduce? I mean that I

0:30:14.240 --> 0:30:16.760
<v Speaker 1>think these days you you'd probably say no, right, I

0:30:16.800 --> 0:30:18.440
<v Speaker 1>mean no if you don't want to have children, of

0:30:18.440 --> 0:30:23.440
<v Speaker 1>course not. But then again, the it starts getting weird

0:30:24.000 --> 0:30:26.600
<v Speaker 1>when you think about the idea that, Okay, there's one

0:30:26.680 --> 0:30:31.480
<v Speaker 1>generation where imagine everybody has access to this, everybody has

0:30:31.520 --> 0:30:34.560
<v Speaker 1>the option to live forever, and they just stopped making babies.

0:30:34.560 --> 0:30:36.760
<v Speaker 1>So essentially what you're saying is there's a generation that

0:30:36.880 --> 0:30:40.120
<v Speaker 1>is the last. Yeah, suddenly you're part of the last people,

0:30:40.320 --> 0:30:43.680
<v Speaker 1>and these people just keep going. It certainly seems very

0:30:43.720 --> 0:30:48.400
<v Speaker 1>egocentric to suggest that that the that generation would be

0:30:48.800 --> 0:30:51.520
<v Speaker 1>the ultimate one, that would be the last one, and

0:30:51.600 --> 0:30:55.560
<v Speaker 1>that that nothing following that would be worth the trade

0:30:55.560 --> 0:30:59.280
<v Speaker 1>off of immortality. Right, that's I mean, you know, to

0:30:59.320 --> 0:31:03.360
<v Speaker 1>say that is pretty Look, I'm an egocentric guy. I

0:31:03.440 --> 0:31:05.760
<v Speaker 1>got an ego a mile ye, I would not be

0:31:05.800 --> 0:31:10.400
<v Speaker 1>comfortable saying that I'll still take your immortal juice, thank you. Well,

0:31:10.440 --> 0:31:14.160
<v Speaker 1>it's weird, and it certainly wouldn't translate to saying now

0:31:14.240 --> 0:31:17.280
<v Speaker 1>that that anybody should have the responsibility to have children.

0:31:17.280 --> 0:31:19.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that seems absurd to me. But well, there's

0:31:19.960 --> 0:31:23.120
<v Speaker 1>certainly a lot of religions that say that. Sure, sure,

0:31:23.160 --> 0:31:25.320
<v Speaker 1>that's fine. I mean, I'm just saying I wouldn't personally,

0:31:25.760 --> 0:31:29.680
<v Speaker 1>but but that's somehow that seems completely upset by this

0:31:29.720 --> 0:31:32.000
<v Speaker 1>living for everything. If your if your plan is to

0:31:32.080 --> 0:31:36.360
<v Speaker 1>live forever and never replace yourself, that that does strike

0:31:36.360 --> 0:31:38.840
<v Speaker 1>me as odd. I don't expect anyone to replace me,

0:31:38.920 --> 0:31:44.120
<v Speaker 1>and I actively work to prevent that because I like

0:31:44.240 --> 0:31:47.360
<v Speaker 1>my gig. That's right. You fear being usurped I do.

0:31:48.000 --> 0:31:52.960
<v Speaker 1>I do. I undercut my my colleagues at every opportunity. Yeah,

0:31:53.280 --> 0:31:57.440
<v Speaker 1>this is not true. I'm not sure, absolutely not right.

0:31:57.480 --> 0:31:59.680
<v Speaker 1>So if you saw the emails I wrote in support

0:31:59.680 --> 0:32:07.280
<v Speaker 1>of you, you change your tune suet um. But we're

0:32:07.320 --> 0:32:09.520
<v Speaker 1>we're having fun with this because if we didn't, we'd

0:32:09.520 --> 0:32:12.959
<v Speaker 1>probably go crazy trying to discuss it. Pretty dark topic

0:32:13.840 --> 0:32:16.280
<v Speaker 1>it is in many ways, because again, you know, you're

0:32:16.280 --> 0:32:20.600
<v Speaker 1>talking about changing one of the fundamental experiences of what

0:32:20.720 --> 0:32:23.640
<v Speaker 1>it is to be human. I mean, this is every

0:32:23.720 --> 0:32:28.760
<v Speaker 1>human from the very first Homo sapien up until today,

0:32:29.000 --> 0:32:32.960
<v Speaker 1>has the knowledge that one day they are not going

0:32:33.000 --> 0:32:36.280
<v Speaker 1>to be around anymore. In fact, that's often involved in

0:32:36.280 --> 0:32:39.160
<v Speaker 1>in what consciousness is. Right when people try to define it,

0:32:39.240 --> 0:32:40.920
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that comes up, as they say,

0:32:41.240 --> 0:32:44.240
<v Speaker 1>it's the awareness of your own death. That's that's one

0:32:45.040 --> 0:32:49.880
<v Speaker 1>one facet of what people will use to describe consciousness.

0:32:50.000 --> 0:32:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Keeping in mind, the consciousness is one of those things

0:32:52.000 --> 0:32:55.160
<v Speaker 1>that no one has ever been able to truly define.

0:32:55.360 --> 0:32:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Like the best definition I ever see is that we

0:33:00.080 --> 0:33:03.719
<v Speaker 1>start to define things about the mind, and whatever has

0:33:03.800 --> 0:33:06.720
<v Speaker 1>left is consciousness. So every year that goes by, as

0:33:06.760 --> 0:33:09.840
<v Speaker 1>we define more things about the mind, that the concept

0:33:09.840 --> 0:33:14.080
<v Speaker 1>of consciousness gets smaller, but it becomes that undefined variable

0:33:14.160 --> 0:33:17.840
<v Speaker 1>that we see in other like crazy mathematic equations where

0:33:18.120 --> 0:33:20.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, they say, look, this makes the universe makes

0:33:20.440 --> 0:33:23.800
<v Speaker 1>sense as long as something happens over here in this

0:33:23.880 --> 0:33:26.520
<v Speaker 1>part of the equation that we can't really explain yet,

0:33:26.520 --> 0:33:28.880
<v Speaker 1>but hopefully one day we will discover what it is.

0:33:29.040 --> 0:33:30.880
<v Speaker 1>The same sort of thing holds true with the mind

0:33:30.920 --> 0:33:33.440
<v Speaker 1>and consciousness well, and as we discussed in the very

0:33:33.480 --> 0:33:36.239
<v Speaker 1>last podcast we recorded it. It might not be a

0:33:36.280 --> 0:33:38.840
<v Speaker 1>thing at all. It might be an emergent property of

0:33:38.880 --> 0:33:41.920
<v Speaker 1>neurons in your brain. Sure, I definitely think it's you

0:33:41.960 --> 0:33:45.320
<v Speaker 1>know that it's I'm a pragmatist. I think it's based

0:33:45.360 --> 0:33:49.840
<v Speaker 1>on physical matter. It's not a thing but an interaction. Yeah, yeah,

0:33:50.160 --> 0:33:53.160
<v Speaker 1>I personally don't see it as being some other kind

0:33:53.200 --> 0:33:57.920
<v Speaker 1>of energy type experience. But we don't have like an

0:33:58.000 --> 0:34:00.360
<v Speaker 1>unfound gland somewhere in there that goes, oh, that's a

0:34:00.360 --> 0:34:02.760
<v Speaker 1>consciousness place, right, or that, or that there is some

0:34:02.840 --> 0:34:07.800
<v Speaker 1>other element that is not not directly relatable to physical matter.

0:34:08.360 --> 0:34:10.759
<v Speaker 1>But that's just one view. I understand. There are people

0:34:10.760 --> 0:34:13.960
<v Speaker 1>who have very different views on that, and I totally

0:34:14.040 --> 0:34:17.160
<v Speaker 1>respect that because I'm not a neuroscientist or a psychologist

0:34:17.239 --> 0:34:21.520
<v Speaker 1>and it's just my own personal perspective. Um So, but

0:34:21.640 --> 0:34:24.080
<v Speaker 1>you are a shaman of the future. I am that.

0:34:24.440 --> 0:34:29.319
<v Speaker 1>I am that it's a heavy burden. But if you

0:34:29.440 --> 0:34:34.600
<v Speaker 1>reference queen lyrics and you know, just keep on keeping on,

0:34:34.719 --> 0:34:37.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it's fine. All right. Well, okay, quick quick pole,

0:34:37.200 --> 0:34:41.400
<v Speaker 1>quick Pole, You've got the choice. You can take the

0:34:41.440 --> 0:34:46.880
<v Speaker 1>immortal pill. Where you are going to live indefinitely. So really,

0:34:46.880 --> 0:34:50.520
<v Speaker 1>the only way you die is through severe injury or illness,

0:34:51.040 --> 0:34:54.560
<v Speaker 1>or you take your own life, or you can walk

0:34:54.600 --> 0:34:57.440
<v Speaker 1>away knowing that you know, if you take care of yourself,

0:34:57.480 --> 0:34:59.960
<v Speaker 1>you can live a good long life. But you're an

0:35:00.040 --> 0:35:03.239
<v Speaker 1>not going to be living anywhere close to what someone

0:35:03.280 --> 0:35:06.080
<v Speaker 1>who would take that pill would experience. Joe, what do

0:35:06.120 --> 0:35:10.560
<v Speaker 1>you do? I don't know. I mean, honestly, I guess

0:35:10.560 --> 0:35:13.439
<v Speaker 1>my gut reaction is I probably wouldn't. I'd rather take

0:35:13.480 --> 0:35:17.400
<v Speaker 1>the not die soon pill, right, that's not an option

0:35:17.520 --> 0:35:21.799
<v Speaker 1>you got that you not die ever, or you've got

0:35:21.800 --> 0:35:24.440
<v Speaker 1>the if you take care of yourself and you avoid

0:35:24.480 --> 0:35:28.520
<v Speaker 1>illness and injury, you'll live a good long while, assuming

0:35:28.520 --> 0:35:31.160
<v Speaker 1>all the other variables. I guess I'd say, no, No,

0:35:31.360 --> 0:35:33.799
<v Speaker 1>it's just too it's too and it's too scary. I

0:35:33.840 --> 0:35:36.640
<v Speaker 1>don't know. Joe walks away from the pill. Lawrence, Oh yeah, no, no,

0:35:36.760 --> 0:35:39.600
<v Speaker 1>I take it. Yes, I take I take my pill

0:35:39.680 --> 0:35:48.680
<v Speaker 1>and Joe's pill Immortal times too. You become the future vampire,

0:35:48.960 --> 0:35:54.760
<v Speaker 1>draining the life force of other isn't roaming the waste

0:35:54.840 --> 0:35:58.560
<v Speaker 1>land I will. You'll find me at a parking lot

0:35:59.040 --> 0:36:03.520
<v Speaker 1>at Masson Square garden carrying a sword that has no

0:36:06.480 --> 0:36:10.160
<v Speaker 1>there can be only one. It'll come down. It'll come

0:36:10.200 --> 0:36:13.640
<v Speaker 1>down between me and Lauren, and she'll win because she's

0:36:13.640 --> 0:36:17.400
<v Speaker 1>got some lamping experience that I don't have. So but

0:36:17.400 --> 0:36:21.200
<v Speaker 1>but until that day, I will still battle for the prize.

0:36:21.440 --> 0:36:26.160
<v Speaker 1>What's the future of LARPing? That's another podcast, very good question, guys.

0:36:26.160 --> 0:36:28.120
<v Speaker 1>If you want to know what the future of lamping is,

0:36:28.160 --> 0:36:30.560
<v Speaker 1>then I suggest you right in and you ask, and

0:36:30.600 --> 0:36:33.880
<v Speaker 1>then we will actually answer that question. But to do that,

0:36:33.920 --> 0:36:36.319
<v Speaker 1>you've got to send us an email that addresses f

0:36:36.560 --> 0:36:39.320
<v Speaker 1>W Thinking at Discovery dot com or go to f

0:36:39.480 --> 0:36:41.520
<v Speaker 1>W Thinking dot com. That's where you can find all

0:36:41.600 --> 0:36:45.760
<v Speaker 1>the videos, the blogs, podcasts, and links to our social media.

0:36:46.040 --> 0:36:47.799
<v Speaker 1>Get in touch with us. Let's know what you like

0:36:47.920 --> 0:36:49.960
<v Speaker 1>about the show, let us know what you are excited

0:36:49.960 --> 0:36:52.279
<v Speaker 1>about in the future, and ask us some questions that

0:36:52.400 --> 0:36:54.439
<v Speaker 1>you really want to answer. We're really excited to hear

0:36:54.440 --> 0:36:57.080
<v Speaker 1>from this and we will taught you again. Really sick

0:37:00.800 --> 0:37:03.239
<v Speaker 1>for more on this topic and the future of technology,

0:37:03.520 --> 0:37:16.719
<v Speaker 1>visit forward thinking dot com brought to you by Toyota.

0:37:17.160 --> 0:37:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Let's go places