WEBVTT - Who Investigates Deaths in Antarctica?

0:00:01.920 --> 0:00:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Brainstuff, a production of I Heart Radio, Hey

0:00:06.559 --> 0:00:11.119
<v Speaker 1>brain Stuff. Lauren Vogelbaum. Here. In May of the year

0:00:11.160 --> 0:00:14.920
<v Speaker 1>two thousand, Rodney Marks, an astro physicists spending the winter

0:00:14.960 --> 0:00:18.400
<v Speaker 1>at the South Pole, died suddenly after an acute illness.

0:00:19.440 --> 0:00:22.919
<v Speaker 1>Because no flights could land during the frigid winter, Mark's

0:00:22.920 --> 0:00:25.680
<v Speaker 1>body had to be stored for months until late October

0:00:25.960 --> 0:00:29.240
<v Speaker 1>and then autopsied in New Zealand, and Arctica's nearest neighbor.

0:00:30.720 --> 0:00:34.519
<v Speaker 1>The mysterious death touched off an international incident. Marks was

0:00:34.560 --> 0:00:37.840
<v Speaker 1>an Australian working on a US base, and the investigation

0:00:37.880 --> 0:00:41.040
<v Speaker 1>into his death was being handled in New Zealand. If

0:00:41.080 --> 0:00:44.160
<v Speaker 1>it turned out to be ruled a homicide, where would

0:00:44.159 --> 0:00:48.680
<v Speaker 1>the case be tried. It's not a simple question. Despite

0:00:48.720 --> 0:00:53.080
<v Speaker 1>being the temporary home for thousands of scientific researchers, civilian staffers,

0:00:53.120 --> 0:00:56.760
<v Speaker 1>and a few hardy tourists, Antarctica is literally in no

0:00:56.880 --> 0:01:00.520
<v Speaker 1>man's land. According to the nineteen sixty one and Art Treaty,

0:01:00.840 --> 0:01:04.480
<v Speaker 1>the snowpacked continent belongs to no nation, which makes criminal

0:01:04.560 --> 0:01:09.120
<v Speaker 1>jurisdictions a messy affair. In the United States, if you

0:01:09.160 --> 0:01:11.840
<v Speaker 1>commit a crime, you're tried by either a state or

0:01:11.920 --> 0:01:14.560
<v Speaker 1>federal court, depending on the type of crime and where

0:01:14.600 --> 0:01:18.479
<v Speaker 1>it took place. American courts even have jurisdiction for certain

0:01:18.560 --> 0:01:22.000
<v Speaker 1>crimes committed outside the nation's borders, like a murder on

0:01:22.040 --> 0:01:24.800
<v Speaker 1>a ship flying the American flag or a crime at

0:01:24.800 --> 0:01:29.039
<v Speaker 1>a U S military base or installation overseas. Pretty straightforward.

0:01:29.880 --> 0:01:35.080
<v Speaker 1>An Arctica, though, is anything but straightforward. For the article

0:01:35.080 --> 0:01:37.199
<v Speaker 1>of this episode is based on How Stuff Work. Spoke

0:01:37.240 --> 0:01:40.360
<v Speaker 1>by email with Dr Alan Hemmings, an expert on Antarctic

0:01:40.400 --> 0:01:42.880
<v Speaker 1>governance who spent two winters at the South Pole with

0:01:42.920 --> 0:01:46.200
<v Speaker 1>the British Antarctic Survey. He explained that there are no

0:01:46.360 --> 0:01:50.960
<v Speaker 1>clear legal jurisdictions in Antarctica because there are no recognized territories.

0:01:52.760 --> 0:01:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Seven countries Argentina, Australia, Britain, Chile, France, New Zealand and

0:01:57.920 --> 0:02:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Norway make pie shaped territorial claims on the ic waste land,

0:02:03.040 --> 0:02:06.000
<v Speaker 1>and the United States and Russia exercise sovereignty at their

0:02:06.000 --> 0:02:09.880
<v Speaker 1>own research stations, but none of these claims are officially

0:02:09.919 --> 0:02:12.960
<v Speaker 1>recognized by the Antarctic Treaty, and a few of them

0:02:13.000 --> 0:02:17.400
<v Speaker 1>even overlap. Instead, the general rule is that a crime

0:02:17.440 --> 0:02:20.200
<v Speaker 1>committed by a US citizen at a US owned research

0:02:20.240 --> 0:02:24.040
<v Speaker 1>facility would be prosecuted in a US court. The same

0:02:24.120 --> 0:02:26.960
<v Speaker 1>goes for Russia, New Zealand, Japan, or any of the

0:02:26.960 --> 0:02:32.920
<v Speaker 1>other twenty nine countries operating research stations in Antarctica. Hemmings said,

0:02:33.600 --> 0:02:36.840
<v Speaker 1>But if the dead person and the alleged murderer are

0:02:36.880 --> 0:02:40.359
<v Speaker 1>from different states, that is, countries and don't recognize each

0:02:40.360 --> 0:02:44.080
<v Speaker 1>other's claim, and most don't. Particularly if the critical events

0:02:44.080 --> 0:02:47.359
<v Speaker 1>occur away from anybody's station, say at a campsite, then

0:02:47.400 --> 0:02:53.200
<v Speaker 1>it won't necessarily be clear who has jurisdiction. As far

0:02:53.240 --> 0:02:56.240
<v Speaker 1>as Hemmings knows, there's never been a criminal prosecution for

0:02:56.280 --> 0:02:59.679
<v Speaker 1>a murder committed on the continent. That's not to say

0:02:59.720 --> 0:03:03.600
<v Speaker 1>it's free from violence and vice. The dark and frigid

0:03:03.600 --> 0:03:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Antarctic winner, coupled with long stretches of isolation and cramped cohabitation,

0:03:08.760 --> 0:03:12.120
<v Speaker 1>plus heavy drinking, have driven some visitors to the brink.

0:03:13.080 --> 0:03:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Stories circulate of a Russian man who killed a companion

0:03:16.200 --> 0:03:19.000
<v Speaker 1>over a chess game, and of a researcher sick with

0:03:19.080 --> 0:03:24.480
<v Speaker 1>cabin fever who burned down his own station. Ultimately, New

0:03:24.560 --> 0:03:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Zealand claimed legal jurisdiction in the Marks case, which we

0:03:27.880 --> 0:03:31.360
<v Speaker 1>mentioned at the top since it had possession of his body.

0:03:31.919 --> 0:03:35.200
<v Speaker 1>An investigation uncovered no clear evidence of foul play, so

0:03:35.280 --> 0:03:39.000
<v Speaker 1>there were no arrests or prosecutions. The leading theory is

0:03:39.040 --> 0:03:41.320
<v Speaker 1>that Marks drank a batch of bad liquor, as his

0:03:41.360 --> 0:03:46.960
<v Speaker 1>autopsy showed his body contained lethal traces of methanol. Hemmings

0:03:47.000 --> 0:03:49.920
<v Speaker 1>believes that in the event of a particularly heinous crime

0:03:50.000 --> 0:03:53.960
<v Speaker 1>involving citizens from different countries, the parties quote will likely

0:03:54.000 --> 0:03:56.840
<v Speaker 1>cooperate with each other and may very well agree that

0:03:56.880 --> 0:03:59.280
<v Speaker 1>one of them takes jurisdiction or come up with some

0:03:59.360 --> 0:04:04.560
<v Speaker 1>imaginative of solution. But some legal observers are concerned that

0:04:04.680 --> 0:04:08.080
<v Speaker 1>goodwill and cooperation aren't enough, and that the decades old

0:04:08.080 --> 0:04:11.040
<v Speaker 1>in Arctic Treaty needs to be updated before a truly

0:04:11.120 --> 0:04:15.280
<v Speaker 1>messy crime happens on the ice. In a two three paper,

0:04:15.560 --> 0:04:19.359
<v Speaker 1>Townsend University law professor W. Michael second Ish proposed that

0:04:19.440 --> 0:04:21.760
<v Speaker 1>the twenty two nations that made up a governing Committee

0:04:21.800 --> 0:04:27.440
<v Speaker 1>for an Arctic Affairs establish a unified criminal code. Second

0:04:27.520 --> 0:04:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Is wrote one cannot easily determine whether an action is

0:04:31.000 --> 0:04:34.080
<v Speaker 1>a criminal act because of the various countries involved and

0:04:34.240 --> 0:04:38.560
<v Speaker 1>multiple basis for jurisdiction. This is an intolerable situation for

0:04:38.600 --> 0:04:42.919
<v Speaker 1>a criminal defendant and violates any reasonable concept of due process.

0:04:44.760 --> 0:04:47.800
<v Speaker 1>In the absence of such an international agreement, there's no

0:04:48.000 --> 0:04:50.920
<v Speaker 1>saying how or where in an Arctic murderer would be

0:04:50.960 --> 0:04:55.160
<v Speaker 1>called to justice. This issue may become increasingly important as

0:04:55.200 --> 0:04:58.720
<v Speaker 1>more and more nations in corporations i in Arctica's rich

0:04:58.760 --> 0:05:07.880
<v Speaker 1>oil reserves or future exploitation. Today's episode is based on

0:05:07.920 --> 0:05:10.520
<v Speaker 1>the article Who's in charge of investigating depths? In an

0:05:10.600 --> 0:05:13.560
<v Speaker 1>article on how stuff works dot Com written by Dave Rubes.

0:05:14.080 --> 0:05:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Brain Stuff is production by Heart Radio in partnership with

0:05:16.440 --> 0:05:18.960
<v Speaker 1>how stuff Works dot Com, and it's produced by Tyler Klang.

0:05:19.520 --> 0:05:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Four more podcasts from my heart Radio visit the i

0:05:21.880 --> 0:05:24.599
<v Speaker 1>heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to

0:05:24.640 --> 0:05:25.520
<v Speaker 1>your favorite shows.