WEBVTT - Bridgewater, Coinbase, China, and Commodities (Podcast)

0:00:00.760 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEO's, market pros and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:15.560
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets podcast

0:00:15.560 --> 0:00:18.400
<v Speaker 1>called Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:21.680
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. Yes you're just dark.

0:00:21.840 --> 0:00:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Eric Schatzker is in the studio. I guess Paul Singer

0:00:25.280 --> 0:00:27.400
<v Speaker 1>is an active guy, right, But I always thought of

0:00:27.400 --> 0:00:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Elliott as a distressed investor because Hans Humes like cut

0:00:30.280 --> 0:00:34.920
<v Speaker 1>his teeth there with Argentina. Elliott certainly started out that way.

0:00:34.960 --> 0:00:38.720
<v Speaker 1>I'd say Elliott is highly opportunistic more than anything else.

0:00:38.760 --> 0:00:41.240
<v Speaker 1>They make long only bets as well. Yes, they function,

0:00:41.400 --> 0:00:45.720
<v Speaker 1>they have an activist profile. They certainly throw their weight around.

0:00:46.840 --> 0:00:50.720
<v Speaker 1>But yes, I would say that bare knuckled distressed investing

0:00:50.840 --> 0:00:53.200
<v Speaker 1>is one of their specialties. It's not why you're in here, though,

0:00:53.240 --> 0:00:56.680
<v Speaker 1>It's not. It's not you got something else to talk about. So,

0:00:57.160 --> 0:01:02.279
<v Speaker 1>Ray Dalio, you broke the story when he officially announced

0:01:02.280 --> 0:01:05.440
<v Speaker 1>he was back in October. Yes, Ray Dalio, after twelve

0:01:05.560 --> 0:01:08.479
<v Speaker 1>years of trying finally let go of the rains at Bridgewater.

0:01:09.080 --> 0:01:11.680
<v Speaker 1>And we've been waiting for five months to find out

0:01:11.720 --> 0:01:15.600
<v Speaker 1>what the new generation of leadership under the CEO near Bardaa,

0:01:15.720 --> 0:01:19.280
<v Speaker 1>former Israeli military guy, really was going to do. And

0:01:19.360 --> 0:01:21.880
<v Speaker 1>now we know. So what are the details? Let us in.

0:01:22.040 --> 0:01:24.000
<v Speaker 1>There is a lot happening, and it is happening on

0:01:24.040 --> 0:01:27.560
<v Speaker 1>a very accelerated timetable. The first thing people are going

0:01:27.600 --> 0:01:30.039
<v Speaker 1>to notice and find surprising is that Bridgewater is cutting

0:01:30.040 --> 0:01:33.200
<v Speaker 1>some jobs. The firm employees about thirteen hundred people and

0:01:33.240 --> 0:01:35.400
<v Speaker 1>it's getting rid of about one hundred and not all

0:01:35.440 --> 0:01:37.240
<v Speaker 1>of those people are junior folks. That will be some

0:01:37.319 --> 0:01:40.920
<v Speaker 1>senior people as well. Why because it wants to deploy

0:01:41.080 --> 0:01:44.240
<v Speaker 1>those resources. There isn't an infinite amount of money, even

0:01:44.240 --> 0:01:47.360
<v Speaker 1>though Bridgewater is a big and very profitable firm, into

0:01:47.400 --> 0:01:50.680
<v Speaker 1>new initiatives and we'll talk about those. The other thing

0:01:50.680 --> 0:01:53.600
<v Speaker 1>that's really worth mentioning is that Bridgewater is capping the

0:01:53.680 --> 0:01:57.080
<v Speaker 1>size of its so called flagship hedge fund strategy. This

0:01:57.160 --> 0:02:00.720
<v Speaker 1>is it has a name Pure Alpha, and it is

0:02:01.200 --> 0:02:05.040
<v Speaker 1>the product, the hedge fund product that Bridgewater offers its clients.

0:02:05.160 --> 0:02:08.600
<v Speaker 1>The idea is that it will over time generate excess

0:02:08.639 --> 0:02:13.680
<v Speaker 1>return in other words alpha hence pure alpha. Bridgewater for

0:02:13.760 --> 0:02:17.720
<v Speaker 1>so many years defied the laws of hedge fund gravity.

0:02:18.000 --> 0:02:22.440
<v Speaker 1>The conventional wisdom was always that strategies outside of equities

0:02:22.800 --> 0:02:27.799
<v Speaker 1>were capacity constrained. Some strategies and things like distressed credit

0:02:27.800 --> 0:02:30.560
<v Speaker 1>are very capacity constrained. There just isn't that much to do.

0:02:30.720 --> 0:02:34.120
<v Speaker 1>So that macroso pretty big, but too much money. They

0:02:34.120 --> 0:02:38.480
<v Speaker 1>can't put it to work. They can't generate high enough returns. Yet,

0:02:38.680 --> 0:02:42.200
<v Speaker 1>as I say, Bridgewater defied gravity because it's two principled strategies,

0:02:42.280 --> 0:02:45.160
<v Speaker 1>pure alpha and the risk parity strategy called all Weather.

0:02:45.720 --> 0:02:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Hoovered up assets at an unbelievable pace. In two eleven

0:02:49.680 --> 0:02:52.680
<v Speaker 1>it crossed one hundred billion dollars in total assets, and

0:02:52.720 --> 0:02:55.600
<v Speaker 1>then more recently it has been north of one hundred

0:02:55.600 --> 0:02:58.960
<v Speaker 1>and fifty. Wow, and now you know, the natural laws

0:02:58.960 --> 0:03:01.800
<v Speaker 1>of the universe appear to be taking hold. Bridgewater's performance

0:03:02.200 --> 0:03:07.240
<v Speaker 1>during the twenty tens was you know, this is an understatement, uninspiring,

0:03:08.000 --> 0:03:12.440
<v Speaker 1>and they've gone back to the well look, gave themselves

0:03:12.480 --> 0:03:14.680
<v Speaker 1>a hard look in the mirror and recognize that things

0:03:14.720 --> 0:03:18.880
<v Speaker 1>had to change. The inference I can draw from my

0:03:19.000 --> 0:03:22.720
<v Speaker 1>reporting is that it was harder to change. While Ray

0:03:22.880 --> 0:03:27.119
<v Speaker 1>was still there. He'd built the firm, He'd created its unusual,

0:03:27.280 --> 0:03:31.639
<v Speaker 1>some would say odd culture, transparency, and he was, as

0:03:31.720 --> 0:03:34.120
<v Speaker 1>any founder would be, very attached to a certain way

0:03:34.160 --> 0:03:37.160
<v Speaker 1>of doing things. Now he's gone, a much younger generation

0:03:37.200 --> 0:03:43.480
<v Speaker 1>of leadership is in charge, and you can also infer

0:03:43.560 --> 0:03:45.880
<v Speaker 1>that they've been chomping at the bit because here are

0:03:45.880 --> 0:03:48.200
<v Speaker 1>some things that they're doing that it would have been

0:03:48.280 --> 0:03:51.600
<v Speaker 1>very difficult to see Bridgewater do if Ray were still

0:03:51.720 --> 0:03:53.840
<v Speaker 1>in command. All right, Eric, so we have, as you mentioned,

0:03:53.920 --> 0:03:57.320
<v Speaker 1>the new chief executive officer near Bardea. That's correct, former

0:03:57.400 --> 0:04:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Israeli military guys I mentioned he was a contoon leader. Interesting,

0:04:01.400 --> 0:04:04.440
<v Speaker 1>what does a new team? What are they looking to

0:04:04.440 --> 0:04:07.280
<v Speaker 1>do in terms of new initiatives changes? Yes, we need

0:04:07.320 --> 0:04:09.680
<v Speaker 1>to get into this. There's four areas they're pushing ahead.

0:04:09.720 --> 0:04:12.960
<v Speaker 1>In one is Asia. They want a bigger footprint in Asia.

0:04:13.000 --> 0:04:15.320
<v Speaker 1>They're adding people. In Singapore, they want to get closer

0:04:15.360 --> 0:04:18.960
<v Speaker 1>to some of the institutional clients there. You can draw

0:04:19.520 --> 0:04:22.360
<v Speaker 1>some conclusions about who those might be. Gic, for example,

0:04:22.440 --> 0:04:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Tamask both like in love with China as well. Ray

0:04:27.720 --> 0:04:31.279
<v Speaker 1>said some controversial things about China and I talked to

0:04:31.360 --> 0:04:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Near about China. Their position on China is not ideological.

0:04:35.040 --> 0:04:36.839
<v Speaker 1>They want to be able to invest in China and

0:04:36.880 --> 0:04:39.919
<v Speaker 1>to be able to offer clients exposure to Asia. Why

0:04:40.160 --> 0:04:43.520
<v Speaker 1>because half of the world's economy is driven by Chinese

0:04:43.560 --> 0:04:48.480
<v Speaker 1>monetary policy in Chinese credit creation and China and Asia

0:04:48.560 --> 0:04:52.480
<v Speaker 1>more broadly are generating are adding to global GDP at

0:04:52.520 --> 0:04:55.240
<v Speaker 1>double the rate the US and Europe are. So it's

0:04:55.240 --> 0:04:58.760
<v Speaker 1>a place to simply have to be. Forget about anything

0:04:58.800 --> 0:05:01.680
<v Speaker 1>that Ray may have said or things that people might

0:05:01.720 --> 0:05:04.279
<v Speaker 1>believe have believed about his views on China. So Asia

0:05:04.360 --> 0:05:07.200
<v Speaker 1>is number one. They want to be much bigger in equities,

0:05:07.200 --> 0:05:10.640
<v Speaker 1>specifically long only equities. This is something their clients want

0:05:10.680 --> 0:05:13.480
<v Speaker 1>and it's not a long short equity fund. What they're

0:05:13.480 --> 0:05:16.200
<v Speaker 1>doing is taking their macro views. This is the specialty

0:05:16.200 --> 0:05:19.279
<v Speaker 1>at Bridgewater, the so called compounded understanding that they've built

0:05:19.600 --> 0:05:23.240
<v Speaker 1>over forty seven years and expressing it through equities. So

0:05:23.279 --> 0:05:28.440
<v Speaker 1>if pure alpha again the flagship strategy would have shorted bonds,

0:05:28.560 --> 0:05:33.240
<v Speaker 1>shorted treasuries in if it anticipated a rising rate environment,

0:05:33.920 --> 0:05:37.160
<v Speaker 1>a long only equity strategy would have minimized its exposure

0:05:37.200 --> 0:05:40.719
<v Speaker 1>to interest rate sensitive stocks or similarly, if pure alpha

0:05:40.800 --> 0:05:44.039
<v Speaker 1>was going to go long copper because it believed copper

0:05:44.040 --> 0:05:46.240
<v Speaker 1>prices were going to rise and industrial production was going

0:05:46.279 --> 0:05:49.560
<v Speaker 1>to boom, the long only equity strategy, again expressing a

0:05:49.600 --> 0:05:54.440
<v Speaker 1>macro view, would buy copper miners. The third area machine

0:05:54.480 --> 0:05:58.360
<v Speaker 1>learning and artificial intelligence. This is not a chat GBT thing.

0:05:58.480 --> 0:06:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Bridgewater has been experimented for a decade with these tools,

0:06:02.320 --> 0:06:05.400
<v Speaker 1>but it now wants to build them out, engineer something

0:06:05.440 --> 0:06:09.320
<v Speaker 1>that it can put to work making investment decisions. Again,

0:06:09.520 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 1>humans still part of the picture. And finally, sustainability. You'll

0:06:13.200 --> 0:06:17.600
<v Speaker 1>recall that Karen Carnial Tambour, only thirty seven years old,

0:06:17.720 --> 0:06:21.359
<v Speaker 1>was recently elevated from co chief of Sustainability to co

0:06:21.640 --> 0:06:28.080
<v Speaker 1>CIO at Bridgewater, and clearly you know her hand. Her

0:06:28.080 --> 0:06:34.040
<v Speaker 1>fingerprints are on some of this. Bridgewater is has to

0:06:34.080 --> 0:06:37.400
<v Speaker 1>respond to client demand for more products and sustainability, and

0:06:37.480 --> 0:06:40.120
<v Speaker 1>they want to do sustainability and equities and they want

0:06:40.120 --> 0:06:43.160
<v Speaker 1>to generate. Up until now, their sustainability product has been

0:06:43.240 --> 0:06:47.440
<v Speaker 1>BEATA driven. They they want alpha strategies in sustainability and

0:06:47.520 --> 0:06:51.440
<v Speaker 1>they want to express their views on sustainability. Similarly, inequities

0:06:51.839 --> 0:06:56.160
<v Speaker 1>four areas in which Bridgewater believes it can amass billions

0:06:56.240 --> 0:06:59.880
<v Speaker 1>upon billions of dollars, and if it's successful, they'll ultimately

0:07:00.160 --> 0:07:02.400
<v Speaker 1>be less reliant on what we were talking about before

0:07:02.440 --> 0:07:05.000
<v Speaker 1>pure Alpha and always that's interesting. Vanguard just did a

0:07:05.000 --> 0:07:08.560
<v Speaker 1>study on its ESG products and showed they had no

0:07:08.720 --> 0:07:13.000
<v Speaker 1>outperformance versus I guess, well, Vanguard is let's not forget

0:07:13.040 --> 0:07:15.680
<v Speaker 1>apart from the subadvised funds at Vanguard, Vanguard is a

0:07:15.680 --> 0:07:19.640
<v Speaker 1>beta shop, right. Vanguard is the pioneer of indexing, and

0:07:20.440 --> 0:07:26.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm not disputing Vanguard's conclusions right. What I am saying,

0:07:26.160 --> 0:07:28.280
<v Speaker 1>and what's clear to me is that clients, for better

0:07:28.320 --> 0:07:32.560
<v Speaker 1>or for worse, want Bridgewater to offer them more in sustainability.

0:07:32.800 --> 0:07:35.760
<v Speaker 1>The clients might be wrong, that's for us. It doesn't matter.

0:07:35.840 --> 0:07:37.800
<v Speaker 1>That's fascinating that people want to put their money there. Still,

0:07:37.840 --> 0:07:40.520
<v Speaker 1>after the backlash that we've seen, you know against uh,

0:07:40.720 --> 0:07:43.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, Larry Fink and black Rock, what about the

0:07:43.600 --> 0:07:49.640
<v Speaker 1>radical transparency that to me defined Bridgewater's culture. I only

0:07:49.680 --> 0:07:52.200
<v Speaker 1>know it obviously through reading your reporting for the most part.

0:07:52.240 --> 0:07:55.040
<v Speaker 1>But that's changed. Is that going to change? Because it

0:07:55.040 --> 0:07:59.520
<v Speaker 1>seems like they weren't terribly transparent about Dahlia's fight for

0:07:59.560 --> 0:08:02.760
<v Speaker 1>more money on his way out. Well, there are people

0:08:02.800 --> 0:08:05.880
<v Speaker 1>in Bridgewater who would dispute the account that you've you're

0:08:05.880 --> 0:08:10.080
<v Speaker 1>referring to in another publication. Yes, but the culture is changing,

0:08:10.080 --> 0:08:12.360
<v Speaker 1>of Horse, it's changing. They're younger people in charge now.

0:08:12.360 --> 0:08:16.800
<v Speaker 1>They're no longer so attached to the pain buttons that

0:08:16.960 --> 0:08:19.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, these these these apps, if you will, that

0:08:20.520 --> 0:08:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Bridgewater developed under Ray the baseball cards that you know,

0:08:24.120 --> 0:08:28.920
<v Speaker 1>tried to capture, you know, somebody's entire personality in every

0:08:28.920 --> 0:08:32.160
<v Speaker 1>decision he might make in the years ahead. Those things

0:08:32.160 --> 0:08:40.360
<v Speaker 1>still exist. Are they as popular as as frequently utilized today?

0:08:40.640 --> 0:08:42.360
<v Speaker 1>Hard for me to know. I'm not inside the firm,

0:08:42.400 --> 0:08:44.640
<v Speaker 1>But the distinct impression I get is that Bridgewater has

0:08:44.679 --> 0:08:46.439
<v Speaker 1>moved on from some of that stuff, and they were

0:08:46.520 --> 0:08:51.680
<v Speaker 1>definitely softening the approach that they took to designing things

0:08:51.679 --> 0:08:54.840
<v Speaker 1>like the baseball cards even before Ray left the firm.

0:08:55.120 --> 0:08:57.600
<v Speaker 1>All right, Eric, great, great stuff. One of the top

0:08:57.600 --> 0:08:59.880
<v Speaker 1>red stories on the Bloomberg terminal will be for the

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:05.600
<v Speaker 1>entire day, I predict Eric Schatzker, Bloomberg News. Excellent reporting Greenby.

0:09:05.679 --> 0:09:08.880
<v Speaker 1>For those who know about Bridge Ray Dalio, the changes,

0:09:08.920 --> 0:09:11.160
<v Speaker 1>they're good stuff. We appreciate Eric being in on our studio.

0:09:14.040 --> 0:09:16.480
<v Speaker 1>All right, we want to get into the private equity space,

0:09:16.920 --> 0:09:19.000
<v Speaker 1>one of my favorite spaces. And quite frankly, I've been

0:09:19.040 --> 0:09:20.560
<v Speaker 1>on Wall Street for thirty years. I kind of feel

0:09:20.559 --> 0:09:24.360
<v Speaker 1>like it's the last place where you can make outsized returns.

0:09:24.360 --> 0:09:27.120
<v Speaker 1>That's just my personal opinion. Hedge fund business game over

0:09:27.800 --> 0:09:32.720
<v Speaker 1>traditional Wall Street game over in terms of making outsized returns.

0:09:32.720 --> 0:09:34.360
<v Speaker 1>And that's why I like it. If I were a

0:09:34.360 --> 0:09:36.480
<v Speaker 1>young person, I'd be going into private equity right away.

0:09:36.520 --> 0:09:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Andrea Auerback joins us. She's head of private Investments at

0:09:39.160 --> 0:09:42.079
<v Speaker 1>Cambridge Associates. She gets a gold star because she is

0:09:42.160 --> 0:09:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Live and our Bloomberg Interactive Brooker's studio. Andrea talked to

0:09:45.920 --> 0:09:48.600
<v Speaker 1>us about the last I don't know, three or four years.

0:09:48.640 --> 0:09:52.520
<v Speaker 1>The whole world's been upside down, markets all over the place.

0:09:52.559 --> 0:09:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Now we've got a Federal Reserve raising rates and all

0:09:55.000 --> 0:09:58.160
<v Speaker 1>this kind of stuff from the private equity space. Just

0:09:58.160 --> 0:10:00.160
<v Speaker 1>give us when you go talk to clients, how do

0:10:00.200 --> 0:10:04.920
<v Speaker 1>you frame up the last few years? Wonderful question typically,

0:10:04.920 --> 0:10:07.640
<v Speaker 1>and good morning, by the way, big question, good morning

0:10:07.640 --> 0:10:11.320
<v Speaker 1>to you as well. Typically, when folks are asking us

0:10:11.360 --> 0:10:13.760
<v Speaker 1>about what's happening in the private equity space. I kind

0:10:13.760 --> 0:10:16.520
<v Speaker 1>of roll it back a few decades, okay, right, So,

0:10:17.080 --> 0:10:20.120
<v Speaker 1>as you started out with your morning comments, private equity

0:10:21.200 --> 0:10:24.640
<v Speaker 1>has only been institutionalizing since the eighties. It's basically forty

0:10:24.720 --> 0:10:27.160
<v Speaker 1>years old. I wish I were forty years old again,

0:10:27.960 --> 0:10:32.080
<v Speaker 1>and so it's constantly evolving, and so what you've been

0:10:32.120 --> 0:10:34.320
<v Speaker 1>seeing in the last couple of years is really building

0:10:34.320 --> 0:10:36.440
<v Speaker 1>off of a lot of phases that the industry has

0:10:36.440 --> 0:10:39.840
<v Speaker 1>already moved through. Leveraged buyouts are now referred to fondly

0:10:39.840 --> 0:10:42.680
<v Speaker 1>as private equity, and right, little euphemism twists there, but

0:10:42.840 --> 0:10:45.440
<v Speaker 1>part of the reasons for that is that private equity

0:10:45.559 --> 0:10:47.640
<v Speaker 1>isn't just about applying a lot of leverage to a

0:10:47.679 --> 0:10:52.280
<v Speaker 1>company anymore. It's immensely diversified space and ecosystem. So it's

0:10:52.320 --> 0:10:54.880
<v Speaker 1>not just the one thing people tend to think about. Well,

0:10:55.000 --> 0:10:58.360
<v Speaker 1>one thing I think about, and I've spent the last

0:10:58.400 --> 0:11:02.000
<v Speaker 1>six years going to the super Return conference in Berlin,

0:11:02.320 --> 0:11:05.959
<v Speaker 1>is just how much money private equity has a mass.

0:11:06.080 --> 0:11:07.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, every year that I went it was a

0:11:08.000 --> 0:11:13.160
<v Speaker 1>new impossible to understand figure like one point seven trillion,

0:11:13.200 --> 0:11:15.400
<v Speaker 1>and then it was two point three trillion, and just

0:11:15.480 --> 0:11:19.160
<v Speaker 1>so much dry powder that I always wondered, you know,

0:11:19.240 --> 0:11:22.200
<v Speaker 1>with that much money chasing the same assets, is it

0:11:22.280 --> 0:11:25.200
<v Speaker 1>possible to get a decent price? Is that still the

0:11:25.240 --> 0:11:28.839
<v Speaker 1>case that private equity has so much cash and is

0:11:29.440 --> 0:11:32.360
<v Speaker 1>just impossible for them to put it to work. So

0:11:32.400 --> 0:11:34.560
<v Speaker 1>the answer to that, so the big, the big headline

0:11:34.640 --> 0:11:36.839
<v Speaker 1>number that you just mentioned is immense, but it breaks

0:11:36.880 --> 0:11:40.040
<v Speaker 1>down pretty quickly into different categories. Right. So, as we mentioned,

0:11:40.440 --> 0:11:42.880
<v Speaker 1>private equity has been evolving over decades, and so there

0:11:42.880 --> 0:11:46.720
<v Speaker 1>are five thousand gps walking around who have raised some

0:11:46.880 --> 0:11:49.640
<v Speaker 1>part of that one point trillion number that you gave us,

0:11:49.920 --> 0:11:51.760
<v Speaker 1>and they're trying to deploy it within the space that

0:11:51.800 --> 0:11:54.720
<v Speaker 1>they're occupying. Right. So when you break down that overhang

0:11:54.800 --> 0:11:57.240
<v Speaker 1>that you talk about and we define that, i'd like

0:11:57.280 --> 0:11:59.640
<v Speaker 1>to think we're the first to define it actually being honest.

0:12:00.000 --> 0:12:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Amage Associates, Yes, many moons ago. Half of that belongs

0:12:04.200 --> 0:12:06.480
<v Speaker 1>to funds that have five million or more in capital

0:12:06.600 --> 0:12:09.480
<v Speaker 1>under management, right, And so a lot of the larger

0:12:09.480 --> 0:12:13.120
<v Speaker 1>funds have the big money, the more money more problem problem,

0:12:13.440 --> 0:12:16.959
<v Speaker 1>which is they're all maybe looking for a smaller group

0:12:16.960 --> 0:12:19.719
<v Speaker 1>of assets, whereas there's another cohort which might have less

0:12:19.720 --> 0:12:22.520
<v Speaker 1>than a billion in capital, under management and they have

0:12:23.160 --> 0:12:26.160
<v Speaker 1>a broader ecosystem to play in and go find a company,

0:12:26.280 --> 0:12:30.160
<v Speaker 1>and don't forget there's something like six million private businesses

0:12:30.200 --> 0:12:33.800
<v Speaker 1>in the US. They're not all private, private equity owned yet, right,

0:12:34.320 --> 0:12:38.400
<v Speaker 1>all right, So twenty twenty two, the sixty forty portfolio

0:12:38.480 --> 0:12:42.880
<v Speaker 1>for most investors crushed. He couldn't make money anywhere this year. Well,

0:12:42.880 --> 0:12:46.560
<v Speaker 1>you could make money if you owned oil in alternative assets. Well,

0:12:46.559 --> 0:12:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Welisha Brahmas has apartment. Yeah, I mean there's there were

0:12:50.080 --> 0:12:52.480
<v Speaker 1>places where people knocked it out of the park, right, yeah,

0:12:52.480 --> 0:12:54.960
<v Speaker 1>but most sixty forty folks, most it did not. So

0:12:55.040 --> 0:12:56.800
<v Speaker 1>tough times. You come here to twenty twenty three. Now

0:12:56.840 --> 0:13:00.400
<v Speaker 1>we've got a FED reserve kind of reversing raising ray.

0:13:00.559 --> 0:13:03.840
<v Speaker 1>People are concerned, what's the private equity market like today?

0:13:04.000 --> 0:13:06.120
<v Speaker 1>What are you telling clients? What are you hearing from

0:13:06.120 --> 0:13:09.160
<v Speaker 1>your clients? As you'd asked, right now, the private equity

0:13:09.160 --> 0:13:12.959
<v Speaker 1>market is sort of on pause, right, just like most markets.

0:13:13.000 --> 0:13:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Most folks who want to do a transaction, like I

0:13:15.280 --> 0:13:17.520
<v Speaker 1>don't know how to forecast what's about to happen and

0:13:17.559 --> 0:13:19.960
<v Speaker 1>it's impact on the companies I want to buy, and

0:13:20.000 --> 0:13:22.439
<v Speaker 1>if I can't, if I can't forecast. I can't come

0:13:22.520 --> 0:13:25.000
<v Speaker 1>up with an accurate valuation that I'm willing to pay.

0:13:25.040 --> 0:13:26.719
<v Speaker 1>And I also don't know how these companies are going

0:13:26.760 --> 0:13:29.760
<v Speaker 1>to perform because a lot of unknowns just became known

0:13:29.880 --> 0:13:32.280
<v Speaker 1>over the last year or so, right, And so the

0:13:32.320 --> 0:13:35.320
<v Speaker 1>market itself, transaction volumes have been on pause, waiting to

0:13:35.360 --> 0:13:37.439
<v Speaker 1>sort of sort itself out. I think there's a lot

0:13:37.440 --> 0:13:40.600
<v Speaker 1>of pent up transaction volume that will start to come

0:13:40.600 --> 0:13:43.480
<v Speaker 1>to market once folks decide and settle out like this

0:13:43.520 --> 0:13:46.400
<v Speaker 1>is our go forward operating environment. So it's been on

0:13:46.440 --> 0:13:48.280
<v Speaker 1>pause right now, and it's sort of like, you know,

0:13:48.520 --> 0:13:51.040
<v Speaker 1>you check your belongings. Do I have my wallet, my keys?

0:13:51.400 --> 0:13:54.679
<v Speaker 1>Are the companies that I own currently? Are they performing okay?

0:13:54.760 --> 0:13:56.880
<v Speaker 1>Given a lot of the changes that have been coming

0:13:56.880 --> 0:14:01.360
<v Speaker 1>at us all right, higher inflation, higher interest rates, you know,

0:14:01.480 --> 0:14:05.640
<v Speaker 1>difficulty finding good labor, difficulty getting your supply chain moving,

0:14:05.720 --> 0:14:08.720
<v Speaker 1>all those things. So I think the industry itself has

0:14:08.880 --> 0:14:11.480
<v Speaker 1>been a little bit on pause. Check your belongings before

0:14:11.559 --> 0:14:14.720
<v Speaker 1>maybe moving forward into this environment with a plan. But

0:14:14.880 --> 0:14:17.920
<v Speaker 1>sixty forty people for the most part are like you know,

0:14:17.960 --> 0:14:21.840
<v Speaker 1>me and Eric, retail guys who until recently haven't had

0:14:22.000 --> 0:14:26.160
<v Speaker 1>access to alternative assets. Paul is probably an incredited investor,

0:14:26.280 --> 0:14:29.360
<v Speaker 1>so he could. We've had more and more guests on

0:14:29.440 --> 0:14:34.960
<v Speaker 1>their giving access to private investments to retail investors in

0:14:35.080 --> 0:14:38.320
<v Speaker 1>various ways, with various platforms. Is that growing in private

0:14:38.840 --> 0:14:42.800
<v Speaker 1>equity as well? Yes. And one of the reasons for

0:14:42.840 --> 0:14:45.320
<v Speaker 1>this is there's a long term there's a long term trend. Right.

0:14:45.400 --> 0:14:49.360
<v Speaker 1>So when my dad, if you will, was actively working,

0:14:49.600 --> 0:14:54.000
<v Speaker 1>he was receiving a pension right now, lucky I know exactly,

0:14:54.480 --> 0:14:57.200
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of pensions because they were more institutionally

0:14:57.280 --> 0:15:02.560
<v Speaker 1>managed by a centralized, centralized tea. They were pursuing private investments,

0:15:02.840 --> 0:15:05.120
<v Speaker 1>and so a lot of our dads, I guess and

0:15:05.480 --> 0:15:08.720
<v Speaker 1>moms could benefit from having some exposure to alts in

0:15:08.760 --> 0:15:11.960
<v Speaker 1>their retirement program. Now I'm of a different generation. I'm

0:15:11.960 --> 0:15:14.480
<v Speaker 1>in the four o one K class, right, and so

0:15:14.600 --> 0:15:17.600
<v Speaker 1>four oh one k's typically don't have access to privates.

0:15:17.840 --> 0:15:20.440
<v Speaker 1>One of the classic k I want some of that

0:15:20.600 --> 0:15:23.400
<v Speaker 1>is the returns of privates have stood the test of

0:15:23.480 --> 0:15:27.119
<v Speaker 1>time over a forty year period, still a very productive

0:15:27.200 --> 0:15:29.760
<v Speaker 1>returning asset class. And I think a lot of folks

0:15:29.800 --> 0:15:32.680
<v Speaker 1>who don't have access to pensions anymore would like some

0:15:32.800 --> 0:15:36.320
<v Speaker 1>access to the sasset class and then enter stage left

0:15:36.600 --> 0:15:39.280
<v Speaker 1>private equity firms and others trying to figure out how

0:15:39.280 --> 0:15:43.440
<v Speaker 1>to provide exposure to private investments in an appropriate way

0:15:43.760 --> 0:15:45.360
<v Speaker 1>to a four oh one K investor or to a

0:15:45.400 --> 0:15:49.880
<v Speaker 1>retail investor. And that's regulators must and regulators must want

0:15:49.920 --> 0:15:52.760
<v Speaker 1>to help out as well, because it's just really not

0:15:52.880 --> 0:15:56.480
<v Speaker 1>fair if you're a Now we're a whole generation of

0:15:56.520 --> 0:15:58.560
<v Speaker 1>four oh one k people, right, so all of a

0:15:58.600 --> 0:16:03.240
<v Speaker 1>sudden that exposure is gone for retirement accounts, meaning the

0:16:03.360 --> 0:16:05.920
<v Speaker 1>returns are going to be smaller for us than they

0:16:05.960 --> 0:16:09.480
<v Speaker 1>were maybe for pension people. I wonder if you'll see

0:16:09.560 --> 0:16:14.920
<v Speaker 1>changes in regulation or new products that allow retail investors

0:16:14.920 --> 0:16:17.800
<v Speaker 1>to get in in a safe way. It's been interesting

0:16:17.840 --> 0:16:21.480
<v Speaker 1>to watch this. So at Cambridge Associates, we're globally focused, right,

0:16:21.520 --> 0:16:24.280
<v Speaker 1>so we're glad explain to us, really what Cambridge Associates does.

0:16:24.360 --> 0:16:27.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you've been there for quite a while, yes,

0:16:27.080 --> 0:16:29.240
<v Speaker 1>quite a while. Thank you, Thank you for being gracious

0:16:29.280 --> 0:16:32.800
<v Speaker 1>there Cambridge Associates. So we advise and manage capital on

0:16:32.840 --> 0:16:37.920
<v Speaker 1>behalf of endowments and foundations, pensions, sovereign wealth funds, and families.

0:16:37.960 --> 0:16:41.400
<v Speaker 1>So we really advise and invest on behalf of a

0:16:41.440 --> 0:16:45.080
<v Speaker 1>broad swath of family office people. Yeah, family offices, and

0:16:45.120 --> 0:16:48.360
<v Speaker 1>we operate globally. One of the fun things about being

0:16:48.400 --> 0:16:51.080
<v Speaker 1>able to operate globally is you can watch to your

0:16:51.160 --> 0:16:54.840
<v Speaker 1>retail exposure to private equity in different parts of the world.

0:16:54.880 --> 0:16:57.880
<v Speaker 1>They're trying to crack this not themselves, in different ways,

0:16:58.040 --> 0:17:00.880
<v Speaker 1>and so depending on where you are, there is opportunity

0:17:00.920 --> 0:17:04.960
<v Speaker 1>to participate in publicly traded private equity funds or be

0:17:05.040 --> 0:17:08.439
<v Speaker 1>able to participate in a slice of private equity as

0:17:08.480 --> 0:17:12.040
<v Speaker 1>provided to you by a government entity. So they're interesting

0:17:12.119 --> 0:17:15.040
<v Speaker 1>things that I think US investors are looking at for

0:17:15.119 --> 0:17:17.800
<v Speaker 1>ways to innovate and bring that here or to sort

0:17:17.800 --> 0:17:20.080
<v Speaker 1>it out in a way that's American. Can you talk

0:17:20.119 --> 0:17:22.600
<v Speaker 1>to just briefly about private credit, Matt, and I hear

0:17:22.640 --> 0:17:25.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot more about that than we did. It's just

0:17:25.600 --> 0:17:29.439
<v Speaker 1>so hot, yeah, yeah, yeah. Private So private credit. As

0:17:29.440 --> 0:17:33.160
<v Speaker 1>you're probably aware, the area exploded after the GFC right

0:17:33.520 --> 0:17:36.680
<v Speaker 1>and really became quite significant, and the amount of direct

0:17:36.880 --> 0:17:39.800
<v Speaker 1>private direct lending exploded tenfold. I think it was one

0:17:39.880 --> 0:17:43.040
<v Speaker 1>hundred and thirty billion in volume back into eight it's

0:17:43.040 --> 0:17:45.840
<v Speaker 1>now upwards of one point three trillion in volume today,

0:17:46.280 --> 0:17:49.919
<v Speaker 1>so it's definitely a blooming space, right And one of

0:17:49.920 --> 0:17:52.679
<v Speaker 1>the reasons for that is because of the GFC, you

0:17:52.680 --> 0:17:54.800
<v Speaker 1>had some of the changes in the regulations that really

0:17:54.800 --> 0:17:58.840
<v Speaker 1>had to move lending out of banks into where into

0:17:58.840 --> 0:18:01.600
<v Speaker 1>private credit and here comes the growth of that particular

0:18:01.640 --> 0:18:04.320
<v Speaker 1>swath of industry. So private credit has been around for

0:18:04.320 --> 0:18:06.760
<v Speaker 1>a while, it's gotten much more interesting right now, obviously

0:18:06.800 --> 0:18:09.840
<v Speaker 1>because interest rates. Yep. Right, all right, Andrea, thank you

0:18:09.920 --> 0:18:12.920
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us. Really appreciate that very fascinating story.

0:18:12.960 --> 0:18:16.480
<v Speaker 1>Andrea our backhead of private Investments at Cambridge Associates, joining

0:18:16.520 --> 0:18:21.160
<v Speaker 1>us live here in our Bloomberg Interactive, a broker studio.

0:18:22.000 --> 0:18:25.040
<v Speaker 1>We welcome now our Bloomberg TV viewers and radio listeners

0:18:25.040 --> 0:18:28.400
<v Speaker 1>on Shinnali Bathik. And joining me now is Brian Armstrong

0:18:28.480 --> 0:18:30.879
<v Speaker 1>coin Base, the CEO. Brian, thank you so much for

0:18:30.960 --> 0:18:34.360
<v Speaker 1>joining us. You recently made this big interesting bet as

0:18:34.359 --> 0:18:39.399
<v Speaker 1>a centralized exchange on decentralization a year or so ago.

0:18:39.560 --> 0:18:44.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, decentralization was a big worry for traditional financial players,

0:18:44.440 --> 0:18:46.640
<v Speaker 1>but more so now there are a lot of concerns

0:18:46.680 --> 0:18:50.320
<v Speaker 1>about the space. So what is the case for traditional

0:18:50.359 --> 0:18:54.639
<v Speaker 1>financial players to care about Defy. Yeah, well, we're definitely

0:18:54.680 --> 0:18:56.800
<v Speaker 1>excited about a coin base, and we want to make

0:18:56.800 --> 0:18:59.159
<v Speaker 1>sure we help build the future of this technology here

0:18:59.200 --> 0:19:02.159
<v Speaker 1>in America. Actually, a lot of traditional financial services firms

0:19:02.160 --> 0:19:06.439
<v Speaker 1>are integrating this technology. I mean everybody from you know, JP, Morgan,

0:19:06.920 --> 0:19:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Visa and MasterCard, Franklin, Templeton, They're all they have projects

0:19:10.760 --> 0:19:13.680
<v Speaker 1>and teams internally working on how to integrate crypto into

0:19:13.680 --> 0:19:16.000
<v Speaker 1>their services. And I think the reason for that is that,

0:19:16.040 --> 0:19:18.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, eighty percent of Americans are not happy with

0:19:18.160 --> 0:19:20.880
<v Speaker 1>the current financial system as it is today. They think

0:19:20.920 --> 0:19:23.280
<v Speaker 1>it's it's too slow, the fees are too high, it

0:19:23.320 --> 0:19:26.080
<v Speaker 1>doesn't serve everybody equally, and a lot of the technology

0:19:26.160 --> 0:19:28.160
<v Speaker 1>was built forty years ago. The laws we're one hundred

0:19:28.200 --> 0:19:31.080
<v Speaker 1>years ago, and so people are really excited about how

0:19:31.200 --> 0:19:34.600
<v Speaker 1>crypto as a technology can help improve and update the

0:19:34.640 --> 0:19:37.080
<v Speaker 1>financial system, and that's why that's why we're here at

0:19:37.119 --> 0:19:38.760
<v Speaker 1>coin base. We want to make sure that we enable

0:19:38.800 --> 0:19:42.120
<v Speaker 1>that as well. But there are still near term challenges

0:19:42.160 --> 0:19:44.280
<v Speaker 1>and which are the biggest among them. Are they the

0:19:44.560 --> 0:19:47.320
<v Speaker 1>idea of hacks and any vulnerabilities in the system, or

0:19:47.400 --> 0:19:49.960
<v Speaker 1>is it the regulatory environment in the United States. Yeah,

0:19:49.960 --> 0:19:52.119
<v Speaker 1>I mean, my number one priority this year is the

0:19:52.160 --> 0:19:55.040
<v Speaker 1>policy environment, so we need to make sure that gets

0:19:55.040 --> 0:19:56.800
<v Speaker 1>to a good place in the US. You know, the

0:19:57.240 --> 0:19:59.600
<v Speaker 1>rest of the world has actually embraced crypto. We've seen

0:19:59.600 --> 0:20:02.760
<v Speaker 1>all the your financial hubs Singapore and Hong Kong and London,

0:20:02.800 --> 0:20:05.879
<v Speaker 1>and you know, the EU just passed comprehensive crypto legislation.

0:20:05.960 --> 0:20:08.280
<v Speaker 1>So really, what I believe should happen in the United

0:20:08.280 --> 0:20:11.359
<v Speaker 1>States is that we need a clear rule book so

0:20:11.400 --> 0:20:12.920
<v Speaker 1>that this industry can be built here. You know, we

0:20:12.920 --> 0:20:15.200
<v Speaker 1>don't want it to be like five G or semiconductors

0:20:15.240 --> 0:20:18.000
<v Speaker 1>that went offshore. It's actually a matter of national security.

0:20:18.040 --> 0:20:20.720
<v Speaker 1>We get the future of the financial system built here

0:20:20.760 --> 0:20:23.280
<v Speaker 1>inside the United States. And so I've been spending more

0:20:23.280 --> 0:20:25.760
<v Speaker 1>time in DC here in New York, but in DC

0:20:25.960 --> 0:20:28.560
<v Speaker 1>in particular, we're trying to meet with the relevant folks

0:20:28.560 --> 0:20:31.479
<v Speaker 1>that could help draft legislation so Congress can come in

0:20:31.640 --> 0:20:34.600
<v Speaker 1>and pass comprehensive legislation before we get to the Washington

0:20:34.680 --> 0:20:36.680
<v Speaker 1>of it all. I want to still look out five

0:20:36.760 --> 0:20:39.800
<v Speaker 1>years from now, because there are a lot of financial players,

0:20:39.800 --> 0:20:41.879
<v Speaker 1>as you say, that are looking at tokenization. A lot

0:20:41.920 --> 0:20:44.520
<v Speaker 1>of it's happening in the private markets to the extent

0:20:44.640 --> 0:20:48.480
<v Speaker 1>that you think traditional securities can be tokenized five years

0:20:48.560 --> 0:20:51.720
<v Speaker 1>from now. Are you working with collaborating with any banks

0:20:51.800 --> 0:20:55.760
<v Speaker 1>to get to that point. Yeah, So crypto is many

0:20:55.760 --> 0:20:58.760
<v Speaker 1>different things. Right There are crypto securities, which we believe

0:20:58.800 --> 0:21:01.120
<v Speaker 1>there should be a robust market for that in the US.

0:21:01.160 --> 0:21:03.680
<v Speaker 1>In fact, we acquired a broker dealer license that it's

0:21:03.680 --> 0:21:05.480
<v Speaker 1>still dormant right now, but we'd like to work with

0:21:05.480 --> 0:21:08.000
<v Speaker 1>the sec to activate that and create a healthy market

0:21:08.040 --> 0:21:10.800
<v Speaker 1>structure to trade crypto securities. Now, you know, of the

0:21:10.880 --> 0:21:13.040
<v Speaker 1>thousand assets we've looked at coin base, you know, eight

0:21:13.080 --> 0:21:14.800
<v Speaker 1>hundred of them we've rejected. We don't think we have

0:21:15.200 --> 0:21:17.639
<v Speaker 1>maybe their securities. Two hundred or so of them we

0:21:17.680 --> 0:21:19.960
<v Speaker 1>have listed on our platform. We believe those are commodities,

0:21:20.280 --> 0:21:22.120
<v Speaker 1>and so we're going to continue to build that piece

0:21:22.160 --> 0:21:24.800
<v Speaker 1>of our business. We're regulated by the CFTC for instance,

0:21:25.080 --> 0:21:26.720
<v Speaker 1>and make sure we grow that piece as well. But

0:21:26.800 --> 0:21:30.399
<v Speaker 1>cryptos many things. It's commodities, it's securities, it's stable coins,

0:21:30.400 --> 0:21:34.640
<v Speaker 1>it's artwork, it's decentralized identity systems, and so it's tough

0:21:34.680 --> 0:21:36.320
<v Speaker 1>for people to wrap their head around, but it's ultimately

0:21:36.359 --> 0:21:38.560
<v Speaker 1>going to have many different regulators, you know, before we

0:21:38.560 --> 0:21:40.199
<v Speaker 1>get to the regulatory part of this too, we were

0:21:40.200 --> 0:21:43.120
<v Speaker 1>talking kind of about traditional financial players and what role

0:21:43.200 --> 0:21:45.720
<v Speaker 1>they have in this place, in this system. What kind

0:21:45.760 --> 0:21:48.199
<v Speaker 1>of relationship do you have to high frequency trading firms

0:21:48.520 --> 0:21:50.880
<v Speaker 1>prior to the implosion of FTX, who saw them working,

0:21:50.880 --> 0:21:53.760
<v Speaker 1>for example, with IEX. Have you had any conversations with

0:21:53.800 --> 0:21:56.760
<v Speaker 1>them or any others. Well, we're always talking with different

0:21:56.760 --> 0:21:59.000
<v Speaker 1>firms out there and other exchanges that may want to

0:21:59.000 --> 0:22:01.280
<v Speaker 1>trade crypto in various ways. You know, we can act

0:22:01.280 --> 0:22:03.800
<v Speaker 1>as a brokerage or exchange, a custodian. We can play

0:22:03.840 --> 0:22:07.080
<v Speaker 1>different roles in different market structures and in financial services.

0:22:07.080 --> 0:22:09.760
<v Speaker 1>You often see, you know, a company that may compete

0:22:09.800 --> 0:22:12.359
<v Speaker 1>on one product, they're actually collaborators on another product. And

0:22:12.400 --> 0:22:14.680
<v Speaker 1>so we want to make sure that we're helping integrate

0:22:14.680 --> 0:22:17.199
<v Speaker 1>crypto and all aspects of the financial system so we

0:22:17.240 --> 0:22:20.440
<v Speaker 1>can update the financial system. So you were talking about

0:22:20.480 --> 0:22:23.840
<v Speaker 1>the SEC, the CFTC, the SEC's crackdowns as of late.

0:22:23.960 --> 0:22:27.000
<v Speaker 1>In particular, you work with a lot of institutions. Hedge

0:22:27.000 --> 0:22:30.000
<v Speaker 1>funds had been very much getting into crypto prior to

0:22:30.080 --> 0:22:32.800
<v Speaker 1>last year. I'm wondering if the SEC's crackdown is starting

0:22:32.800 --> 0:22:35.639
<v Speaker 1>to scare any of them away. Well in a way, actually,

0:22:35.640 --> 0:22:37.760
<v Speaker 1>I think Coinbase has been a net beneficiary of this

0:22:37.880 --> 0:22:41.000
<v Speaker 1>because there's essentially a flight to quality, you know, a

0:22:41.040 --> 0:22:44.920
<v Speaker 1>coin Base. We're a public company, we have audited financial statements,

0:22:44.960 --> 0:22:48.240
<v Speaker 1>we're a qualified custodian. I mean, we're basically d choice

0:22:48.600 --> 0:22:50.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, based here in the US that hedge funds

0:22:50.240 --> 0:22:51.800
<v Speaker 1>are going to want to work with. And so in

0:22:51.880 --> 0:22:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Q four I mentioned this on our earnings call, actually

0:22:54.320 --> 0:22:57.800
<v Speaker 1>that we saw an increase in the number of institutions

0:22:57.840 --> 0:22:59.919
<v Speaker 1>onboarding to coin Base. Now a lot of them have

0:23:00.080 --> 0:23:03.159
<v Speaker 1>haven't deployed substantial capital to crypto yet in this market environment,

0:23:03.200 --> 0:23:05.119
<v Speaker 1>they're kind of waiting and seeing. But it's great to

0:23:05.160 --> 0:23:07.280
<v Speaker 1>see them onboarding, and that's kind of a coiled spring

0:23:07.320 --> 0:23:10.199
<v Speaker 1>that I think could unleash a lot of potential in

0:23:09.480 --> 0:23:13.720
<v Speaker 1>the next market change. Hedge funds still flocking too, crypto. Listen,

0:23:13.880 --> 0:23:17.160
<v Speaker 1>we are resetting here just really quickly here with Brian Armstrong,

0:23:17.200 --> 0:23:19.480
<v Speaker 1>the CEO of coin based for our Bloomberg television and

0:23:19.600 --> 0:23:24.879
<v Speaker 1>radio listeners. Getting into the complicated regulatory environment now stable coins.

0:23:25.400 --> 0:23:27.800
<v Speaker 1>You were talking about how there are multiple regulators for

0:23:27.840 --> 0:23:31.040
<v Speaker 1>the crypto industry. But who should be the primary regulator

0:23:31.080 --> 0:23:33.600
<v Speaker 1>for stable coins and is there a case for them

0:23:33.640 --> 0:23:36.760
<v Speaker 1>to be overseen more like money market funds. Well, I

0:23:36.840 --> 0:23:39.520
<v Speaker 1>think Congress ultimately is the one that's going to create

0:23:39.520 --> 0:23:41.240
<v Speaker 1>the laws in the United States, right, and so we

0:23:41.280 --> 0:23:45.240
<v Speaker 1>could probably use new legislation, new laws around how stable

0:23:45.280 --> 0:23:48.400
<v Speaker 1>coins should be regulated. I don't presume to tell them

0:23:48.440 --> 0:23:50.199
<v Speaker 1>how to do that, but I think some of the

0:23:50.280 --> 0:23:52.880
<v Speaker 1>key things are uncontroversial. I mean, we need to have

0:23:53.359 --> 0:23:56.000
<v Speaker 1>one to one backing of assets behind these stable coins.

0:23:56.000 --> 0:23:58.760
<v Speaker 1>We need to have audited financial statements to make sure

0:23:58.760 --> 0:24:01.240
<v Speaker 1>the firms issuing these are are doing a good job.

0:24:01.320 --> 0:24:03.199
<v Speaker 1>So these are just kind of basic good practices, and

0:24:03.240 --> 0:24:05.159
<v Speaker 1>I think a stable coin bill is one of the

0:24:05.160 --> 0:24:08.639
<v Speaker 1>first things that could really help you get consensus and

0:24:08.640 --> 0:24:11.439
<v Speaker 1>move things forward in DC to VISA. You still have

0:24:11.480 --> 0:24:13.919
<v Speaker 1>concerns around the stable coin industry, what would they be?

0:24:15.440 --> 0:24:17.639
<v Speaker 1>I mean, as broadly as a concept, I don't have

0:24:17.720 --> 0:24:20.280
<v Speaker 1>concerns about it. There may be individual stable coins which

0:24:20.280 --> 0:24:22.919
<v Speaker 1>are better or worse. I mean, we actually recently delisted

0:24:23.840 --> 0:24:26.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, busd as an example, and the reason we

0:24:26.119 --> 0:24:28.760
<v Speaker 1>did that was, you know, Paxos had gotten who's the

0:24:28.760 --> 0:24:30.960
<v Speaker 1>issue of of BUSD had been kind of ordered to

0:24:30.960 --> 0:24:33.520
<v Speaker 1>stop minting it, so we were concerned about liquidity issues

0:24:33.560 --> 0:24:36.200
<v Speaker 1>for our customers. But you know, we're always evaluating through

0:24:36.200 --> 0:24:40.280
<v Speaker 1>our internal processes different stable coins, different assets, and updating

0:24:40.280 --> 0:24:42.159
<v Speaker 1>when we see new information that comes to light. I'm

0:24:42.160 --> 0:24:45.520
<v Speaker 1>curious about your own way of using stable coins. Recently,

0:24:45.560 --> 0:24:47.960
<v Speaker 1>in the fourth quarter, it's showed that in your filings,

0:24:47.960 --> 0:24:51.280
<v Speaker 1>it's showed that USDC has doubled in your holdings prior

0:24:51.320 --> 0:24:56.520
<v Speaker 1>to the quarter before. Why is that the case? Well, okay,

0:24:56.520 --> 0:24:58.679
<v Speaker 1>so usdc is is growing quite a lot, and I

0:24:58.680 --> 0:25:02.280
<v Speaker 1>think actually USDC is it's the best answer to a

0:25:02.280 --> 0:25:05.120
<v Speaker 1>stable coin in the United States right. Um, it's it's

0:25:05.119 --> 0:25:08.240
<v Speaker 1>issued by Circle, which is a US based company. We're

0:25:08.240 --> 0:25:10.439
<v Speaker 1>in partnership with them, and we want to see that grow.

0:25:11.240 --> 0:25:13.639
<v Speaker 1>It's also been a really nice source of subscription and

0:25:13.680 --> 0:25:16.800
<v Speaker 1>services revenue for US, which is, you know, in contrast

0:25:16.840 --> 0:25:19.800
<v Speaker 1>to trading fees, which are quite volatile. We've seen in

0:25:19.800 --> 0:25:22.480
<v Speaker 1>our Q for earnings that our subscription and services revenue

0:25:22.520 --> 0:25:24.600
<v Speaker 1>is now forty seven percent of coin is the revenue

0:25:24.600 --> 0:25:26.879
<v Speaker 1>almost half, and so that's allowing us to build a

0:25:26.920 --> 0:25:29.800
<v Speaker 1>more predictable business with a diversified set of revenue streams.

0:25:29.800 --> 0:25:32.760
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I'm quite bullish on USD coin, and I

0:25:32.800 --> 0:25:35.080
<v Speaker 1>feel like that's a good solution for the US. Does

0:25:35.119 --> 0:25:39.000
<v Speaker 1>that look a lot more like traditional banking? Not necessarily no,

0:25:39.040 --> 0:25:41.919
<v Speaker 1>I mean in traditional there's many differences, you know, in

0:25:41.960 --> 0:25:44.800
<v Speaker 1>traditional banking, they you know, there's fractional reserve, they have

0:25:44.840 --> 0:25:48.879
<v Speaker 1>banking licenses, there's capital requirements. Everything in USD coin is

0:25:48.880 --> 0:25:52.040
<v Speaker 1>backed one percent. There's no fractional reserve. So I think

0:25:52.040 --> 0:25:54.480
<v Speaker 1>of USD coin as a really important tool to help

0:25:54.480 --> 0:25:58.080
<v Speaker 1>payments be more efficient globally. It's helping provide you know,

0:25:58.119 --> 0:26:00.720
<v Speaker 1>access to you know, something like a bank account, but

0:26:00.800 --> 0:26:02.920
<v Speaker 1>it could be self custodial for many people around the

0:26:02.920 --> 0:26:05.639
<v Speaker 1>world who don't have access to a stable currency. It

0:26:05.680 --> 0:26:08.280
<v Speaker 1>can improve even you know, a lot of defy, which

0:26:08.280 --> 0:26:12.040
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned at the beginning. The trading pairs are denominated

0:26:12.080 --> 0:26:14.520
<v Speaker 1>in usdcoins. So these are all good things which are

0:26:14.640 --> 0:26:17.520
<v Speaker 1>an important part of the ecosystem. So let's move to

0:26:17.600 --> 0:26:20.480
<v Speaker 1>the staking part of the business here. Because you have

0:26:20.680 --> 0:26:23.040
<v Speaker 1>been concerned, you have voice concerns you and your colleagues

0:26:23.080 --> 0:26:26.360
<v Speaker 1>about the SEC's definition of staking and how they've approached staking.

0:26:27.119 --> 0:26:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Are you prepared to fight the SEC on any front

0:26:29.560 --> 0:26:32.560
<v Speaker 1>if you need to when it comes to the staking world. Yeah, so,

0:26:32.680 --> 0:26:35.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean we recently saw there was a settlement with Kraken.

0:26:35.800 --> 0:26:38.439
<v Speaker 1>That's another exchange out there, and they have what they

0:26:38.440 --> 0:26:39.960
<v Speaker 1>called a staking product. It was kind of more of

0:26:40.000 --> 0:26:42.800
<v Speaker 1>a yield product. But you know, in coin basis case,

0:26:42.840 --> 0:26:46.320
<v Speaker 1>our staking product is not a security. There's many differences.

0:26:46.320 --> 0:26:48.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we customers never turn over their assets to

0:26:48.880 --> 0:26:51.440
<v Speaker 1>coin base, for instance. They're they're always in the customer's

0:26:51.440 --> 0:26:54.040
<v Speaker 1>possession and we're really just providing a service that passes

0:26:54.040 --> 0:26:57.320
<v Speaker 1>through those coins to help them, you know, participate in staking,

0:26:57.320 --> 0:27:01.640
<v Speaker 1>which is a decentralized protocol. So that's an important part

0:27:01.640 --> 0:27:03.600
<v Speaker 1>of you know, the cryptoeconomy that we want to make

0:27:03.600 --> 0:27:06.600
<v Speaker 1>sure that we ensure that that's out there, and you know,

0:27:07.080 --> 0:27:08.960
<v Speaker 1>we're prepared to defend that in court if we need to,

0:27:09.080 --> 0:27:10.880
<v Speaker 1>but you know, we never we're never looking for a fight.

0:27:10.920 --> 0:27:13.480
<v Speaker 1>We want to work collaboratively with regulators all over the world.

0:27:14.119 --> 0:27:15.920
<v Speaker 1>But you know, we have to follow a rule of law,

0:27:15.960 --> 0:27:17.600
<v Speaker 1>and in this case, I think we're well within the law.

0:27:17.880 --> 0:27:21.639
<v Speaker 1>Given the stance the SEC has been taking regarding defining

0:27:21.760 --> 0:27:25.600
<v Speaker 1>certain assets of securities. Is there anything that you think

0:27:25.680 --> 0:27:28.919
<v Speaker 1>we'll need to get to that point? Well, you know,

0:27:28.960 --> 0:27:32.040
<v Speaker 1>the SEC has expressed their view about what is a security,

0:27:32.080 --> 0:27:34.160
<v Speaker 1>and they've taken kind of an expansive view of that.

0:27:34.600 --> 0:27:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Um I think, you know, coin Base, we've evaluated over

0:27:36.920 --> 0:27:39.000
<v Speaker 1>a thousand different assets, and as I mentioned earlier, eight

0:27:39.080 --> 0:27:41.480
<v Speaker 1>hundred of them we've rejected and we do think they

0:27:41.520 --> 0:27:43.440
<v Speaker 1>have some properties of being a security, so we don't

0:27:43.480 --> 0:27:45.919
<v Speaker 1>trade those today. Another two hundred or so of them

0:27:45.960 --> 0:27:48.320
<v Speaker 1>we do trade today, and we feel that those are commodities.

0:27:48.640 --> 0:27:51.040
<v Speaker 1>So you know, look, I think as a as a CEO,

0:27:51.080 --> 0:27:52.960
<v Speaker 1>we want to basically just have a clear rule book,

0:27:53.040 --> 0:27:55.680
<v Speaker 1>right and if a clear rules are published, we're happy

0:27:55.680 --> 0:27:57.359
<v Speaker 1>to follow it. And if and if those rules change,

0:27:57.560 --> 0:28:00.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're happy to follow those. Um But I

0:28:00.040 --> 0:28:02.320
<v Speaker 1>think you know, when we when we became a public company,

0:28:02.440 --> 0:28:05.400
<v Speaker 1>we explained to the SEC and our S one filing

0:28:05.440 --> 0:28:08.160
<v Speaker 1>and in dozens of meetings that we've had with the SEC,

0:28:08.240 --> 0:28:11.000
<v Speaker 1>I think we worked pretty collaboratively with them. We've explained

0:28:11.000 --> 0:28:12.800
<v Speaker 1>our business to them many times, including in our S

0:28:12.840 --> 0:28:14.439
<v Speaker 1>one and you know, they approved us to become a

0:28:14.440 --> 0:28:17.480
<v Speaker 1>public company. So we'll continue working with regulators all over

0:28:17.520 --> 0:28:20.399
<v Speaker 1>the world about where the boundaries are on what's a commodity,

0:28:20.440 --> 0:28:22.760
<v Speaker 1>what's the security, or what is something else we're setting

0:28:22.760 --> 0:28:25.240
<v Speaker 1>once more for our Bloomberg radio and television audiences. In

0:28:25.280 --> 0:28:28.600
<v Speaker 1>conversation with coin base CEO Brian Armstrong, you know we're

0:28:28.600 --> 0:28:32.199
<v Speaker 1>talking about the SEC and state regulators as well. You know,

0:28:32.320 --> 0:28:36.040
<v Speaker 1>in regulatory filings, you've noticed that you've received investigative subpoennuts

0:28:36.080 --> 0:28:38.600
<v Speaker 1>from the SEC and state regulators. How and when do

0:28:38.640 --> 0:28:42.360
<v Speaker 1>you get those resolved? Yeah, Well, subpoenas are really just

0:28:42.480 --> 0:28:45.080
<v Speaker 1>requests for information, right, and so we're in dialogue with

0:28:45.280 --> 0:28:47.160
<v Speaker 1>regulators not only here in the US at the state

0:28:47.160 --> 0:28:49.800
<v Speaker 1>and federal level, but really around the world. I mean

0:28:50.360 --> 0:28:53.840
<v Speaker 1>we're in Europe, European markets, and you know, in Singapore

0:28:53.920 --> 0:28:57.680
<v Speaker 1>and Australia, et cetera, Canada, many different markets around the world.

0:28:57.680 --> 0:29:00.200
<v Speaker 1>So I think subpoenas are an important part of the process.

0:28:59.880 --> 0:29:02.360
<v Speaker 1>That's them asking us a question and saying we'd like

0:29:02.440 --> 0:29:04.320
<v Speaker 1>more information on this, and we're happy to do that.

0:29:04.840 --> 0:29:08.480
<v Speaker 1>It sounds like it sounds like there was a tension

0:29:08.480 --> 0:29:10.880
<v Speaker 1>between the SEC and the industry before. It sounds like

0:29:11.160 --> 0:29:13.560
<v Speaker 1>some of those tensions have boiled up after aft TX.

0:29:13.720 --> 0:29:16.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering if you think that the conversations between coin

0:29:16.680 --> 0:29:19.280
<v Speaker 1>base and the SEC in particular have gotten more or

0:29:19.400 --> 0:29:23.080
<v Speaker 1>less contentious over the years. I think we have a

0:29:23.080 --> 0:29:27.040
<v Speaker 1>good relationship with the SEC commissioners and staff, and you know,

0:29:27.040 --> 0:29:29.200
<v Speaker 1>I've met with the chair as well, and so we're

0:29:29.240 --> 0:29:31.760
<v Speaker 1>going to continue to invest in those relationships. I would

0:29:31.760 --> 0:29:33.760
<v Speaker 1>like us to find a way to bring crypto I

0:29:33.760 --> 0:29:36.000
<v Speaker 1>think this is what they want to Our interests are aligned.

0:29:36.240 --> 0:29:39.040
<v Speaker 1>We want to bring this industry within the regulatory perimeter

0:29:39.120 --> 0:29:42.000
<v Speaker 1>so that we have good consumer protection, but we also

0:29:42.160 --> 0:29:44.800
<v Speaker 1>preserve the innovation potential of this. And as I said earlier,

0:29:44.840 --> 0:29:47.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, eighty percent of Americans want the financial system

0:29:47.040 --> 0:29:49.760
<v Speaker 1>to be updated, and this is the most important technology

0:29:49.800 --> 0:29:51.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm aware of that can help do that. So you

0:29:51.680 --> 0:29:53.680
<v Speaker 1>and your collegues have also voiced a lot of concerns today.

0:29:53.680 --> 0:29:55.840
<v Speaker 1>You've voiced concerns about kind of more of the crypto

0:29:55.840 --> 0:29:59.600
<v Speaker 1>industry moving off shore. Draw us a picture here of

0:29:59.640 --> 0:30:03.800
<v Speaker 1>what happens in five, ten, twenty years if the digital

0:30:03.840 --> 0:30:07.480
<v Speaker 1>asset landscape exists mostly outside of the United States. Yeah,

0:30:07.520 --> 0:30:11.000
<v Speaker 1>and exchanges that are not based here. Yeah, Well, I mean, look,

0:30:11.040 --> 0:30:12.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that would be a terrible mistake for the

0:30:12.840 --> 0:30:16.000
<v Speaker 1>United States. I mean, look at what's happening with AI, right,

0:30:16.040 --> 0:30:20.120
<v Speaker 1>that's an important technology trend where it's becoming a matter

0:30:20.160 --> 0:30:22.080
<v Speaker 1>of national security, right that some of these things are

0:30:22.080 --> 0:30:23.480
<v Speaker 1>built in the US or we saw it in the

0:30:23.480 --> 0:30:27.000
<v Speaker 1>past with five G or with semiconductors. And so if

0:30:27.040 --> 0:30:30.680
<v Speaker 1>we have this really powerful technology, cryptocurrency that has the

0:30:30.720 --> 0:30:33.120
<v Speaker 1>potential to update the financial system and improve it in

0:30:33.160 --> 0:30:35.600
<v Speaker 1>so many ways, how can we sit on the sidelines

0:30:35.640 --> 0:30:38.120
<v Speaker 1>in America and say, oh, okay, well, we're gonna let

0:30:38.200 --> 0:30:40.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, the EU pass comprehensive legislation and so it'll

0:30:40.600 --> 0:30:42.880
<v Speaker 1>be built there, and we're gonna let the UAE and

0:30:43.040 --> 0:30:45.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, London and Singapore and Hong Kong. I mean,

0:30:45.920 --> 0:30:48.440
<v Speaker 1>this is America. We need to be a technology hub,

0:30:48.480 --> 0:30:51.440
<v Speaker 1>we need to be a financial hub, and the future

0:30:51.560 --> 0:30:56.560
<v Speaker 1>of this industry needs to be built right here in America.

0:30:57.000 --> 0:30:58.320
<v Speaker 1>I want to get to the bottom. It's I'm just

0:30:58.400 --> 0:31:01.520
<v Speaker 1>reading the Bloomberg News reporting here and some Chinese economy

0:31:01.520 --> 0:31:05.120
<v Speaker 1>shows strong recovery. Is COVID zero era ends? That's the headline.

0:31:05.320 --> 0:31:08.560
<v Speaker 1>So when we talk China, we talk Leland Miller from

0:31:08.600 --> 0:31:12.600
<v Speaker 1>the China Beije book Absolute expert Our go to source here.

0:31:12.640 --> 0:31:17.040
<v Speaker 1>So Leland we had some manufacturing Purchase Managing Managers index

0:31:17.120 --> 0:31:20.280
<v Speaker 1>rose to fifty two point six last month, the highest

0:31:20.320 --> 0:31:22.960
<v Speaker 1>reading since April of twenty twelve. They had some other

0:31:23.000 --> 0:31:27.160
<v Speaker 1>good data out there. Are you buying it? Well, yeah,

0:31:27.600 --> 0:31:32.520
<v Speaker 1>there the economy is recovering, but very important is understanding

0:31:32.560 --> 0:31:34.800
<v Speaker 1>what your base of comparison is. You know, if you

0:31:34.840 --> 0:31:38.720
<v Speaker 1>look at from year ago levels, everything is still down.

0:31:39.160 --> 0:31:41.680
<v Speaker 1>If you look at from the fourth quarter of twenty

0:31:41.920 --> 0:31:45.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty two, everything is up from month on month January

0:31:45.920 --> 0:31:48.280
<v Speaker 1>to February. Some things are up and some things are down.

0:31:48.360 --> 0:31:51.120
<v Speaker 1>So it's telling a very confusing story right now. And

0:31:51.160 --> 0:31:53.760
<v Speaker 1>that's even more convoluted because of course January February is

0:31:54.240 --> 0:31:56.400
<v Speaker 1>difficult with lunar New Year, and people were down with

0:31:56.480 --> 0:31:59.000
<v Speaker 1>COVID and so this has been a very difficult time

0:31:59.040 --> 0:32:02.320
<v Speaker 1>to understand. But yes, you are seeing the beginnings of

0:32:02.320 --> 0:32:05.920
<v Speaker 1>a recovery right now. So it doesn't seem to be

0:32:06.000 --> 0:32:08.760
<v Speaker 1>supporting all the commodities I was hoping to see jump,

0:32:09.200 --> 0:32:11.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, when China reopens. I was like, okay, so

0:32:11.880 --> 0:32:14.160
<v Speaker 1>one point four billion people are now going to go

0:32:14.160 --> 0:32:16.480
<v Speaker 1>to the gas station. But we haven't seen a huge

0:32:16.480 --> 0:32:19.560
<v Speaker 1>gain in oil. Why do you think that is? I

0:32:19.560 --> 0:32:22.280
<v Speaker 1>think people are just trying to understand what this recovery

0:32:22.320 --> 0:32:24.480
<v Speaker 1>is going to look like. Certainly in the second quarter,

0:32:24.520 --> 0:32:27.280
<v Speaker 1>you're going to see, you know, all systems go. You're

0:32:27.280 --> 0:32:30.040
<v Speaker 1>going to see businesses start to reinvest and borrow and hire.

0:32:30.280 --> 0:32:33.960
<v Speaker 1>You're going to see some measure of revenge consumer spending probably,

0:32:34.520 --> 0:32:37.560
<v Speaker 1>and then you know, you also have funds and policy

0:32:37.600 --> 0:32:39.880
<v Speaker 1>support flowing into property for the first time in a

0:32:39.880 --> 0:32:42.120
<v Speaker 1>long while, so things will look better. But I think

0:32:42.160 --> 0:32:44.280
<v Speaker 1>people aren't convinced that this is going to be a

0:32:44.360 --> 0:32:47.120
<v Speaker 1>longer or sustainable recovery. They want to see what the

0:32:47.160 --> 0:32:49.800
<v Speaker 1>policy support looks like. When we look at our data,

0:32:49.880 --> 0:32:52.040
<v Speaker 1>there is credit flowing into the property set of the

0:32:52.040 --> 0:32:53.600
<v Speaker 1>first time in a while, where you know, we are

0:32:53.640 --> 0:32:57.400
<v Speaker 1>seeing policy support to property in particular. So I think

0:32:57.440 --> 0:32:59.520
<v Speaker 1>some of these things will jump in the coming weeks,

0:32:59.560 --> 0:33:02.320
<v Speaker 1>but it's it's it's a story about twenty twenty three,

0:33:02.360 --> 0:33:04.400
<v Speaker 1>and markets aren't convinced yet that that the government's going

0:33:04.480 --> 0:33:07.720
<v Speaker 1>to be behind the economy. Hey, Leland, I don't know

0:33:07.760 --> 0:33:09.280
<v Speaker 1>if you have any data on this, but I have

0:33:09.360 --> 0:33:13.560
<v Speaker 1>seen nothing really definitive about the reopening here. This seems

0:33:13.600 --> 0:33:18.520
<v Speaker 1>to be the best, quickest, least painful reopening of all time.

0:33:19.160 --> 0:33:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Do you have any sense of how bad it got

0:33:21.600 --> 0:33:25.400
<v Speaker 1>in China, if at all as it relates to infections, deaths,

0:33:25.560 --> 0:33:27.640
<v Speaker 1>that type of thing, because it seems to be like

0:33:27.840 --> 0:33:30.560
<v Speaker 1>I think, there's nothing stuffed up hospitals and crematoriums that

0:33:31.120 --> 0:33:33.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that's right here. I don't know. Oh yeah,

0:33:33.640 --> 0:33:36.840
<v Speaker 1>of course, I look if they completely glossed over all

0:33:36.880 --> 0:33:40.080
<v Speaker 1>the difficulties from getting from November to hear you know

0:33:40.160 --> 0:33:42.200
<v Speaker 1>that we don't know what the death counts are. Nobody

0:33:42.200 --> 0:33:44.680
<v Speaker 1>knows except the Chinese government. But we do track, you know,

0:33:44.720 --> 0:33:48.360
<v Speaker 1>the COVID COVID spread our and our corporate networks, and

0:33:48.360 --> 0:33:50.880
<v Speaker 1>what we were picking up is a lot more reports

0:33:50.880 --> 0:33:53.760
<v Speaker 1>of COVID spread in February than what the government was

0:33:53.760 --> 0:33:56.840
<v Speaker 1>was letting on. Everyone's obsessed with these subway indicators that they,

0:33:56.960 --> 0:34:00.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, insist made. You know, they showed the economy,

0:34:00.400 --> 0:34:03.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, recovering and peaking and getting back on step

0:34:03.760 --> 0:34:08.120
<v Speaker 1>in January. We saw COVID flow through the economy in December.

0:34:08.160 --> 0:34:11.480
<v Speaker 1>In January, still in February, and so, yes, the recovery

0:34:11.520 --> 0:34:14.239
<v Speaker 1>is coming. Yes, you're already seeing improvement from from the

0:34:14.320 --> 0:34:16.480
<v Speaker 1>end of last year, but the economy is not back

0:34:16.600 --> 0:34:19.839
<v Speaker 1>up the story of the government about peaking last month.

0:34:19.960 --> 0:34:22.319
<v Speaker 1>That's just not what we're seeing. So you know, this

0:34:22.400 --> 0:34:24.560
<v Speaker 1>is a much lower process and it's a lot uglier

0:34:24.600 --> 0:34:27.000
<v Speaker 1>underneath the underneath the hood than they're admitting. But you know,

0:34:27.120 --> 0:34:29.520
<v Speaker 1>it's it's hard to tell when when they're you know,

0:34:29.560 --> 0:34:32.439
<v Speaker 1>not admitting to anything behind the scenes. But I guess

0:34:32.480 --> 0:34:34.400
<v Speaker 1>if I was an emerging market investor, if I was

0:34:34.440 --> 0:34:39.000
<v Speaker 1>a China investor, no matter how it's getting done, don't

0:34:39.000 --> 0:34:41.799
<v Speaker 1>I have to be bullish on China over the next

0:34:41.800 --> 0:34:44.080
<v Speaker 1>sever you want to buy in before everyone else buy exactly,

0:34:44.760 --> 0:34:46.640
<v Speaker 1>I think you need to be bullish on the next

0:34:46.640 --> 0:34:49.040
<v Speaker 1>several months. I wouldn't be bullish on the next several years,

0:34:49.080 --> 0:34:52.000
<v Speaker 1>because what you're seeing right now is a recovery that

0:34:52.080 --> 0:34:54.399
<v Speaker 1>will happen in the second quarter. It could go from

0:34:54.400 --> 0:34:58.279
<v Speaker 1>two to four quarters. You can continue on, but then

0:34:58.440 --> 0:35:00.880
<v Speaker 1>you know this is a cyclical bound spec and the

0:35:00.920 --> 0:35:05.279
<v Speaker 1>cyclical bounce back takes place with the backdrop of a

0:35:05.360 --> 0:35:08.640
<v Speaker 1>long term structural slowdown. None of these problems that we

0:35:08.680 --> 0:35:11.480
<v Speaker 1>saw before are taken care of. None of them are

0:35:11.520 --> 0:35:14.480
<v Speaker 1>being dealt with. You're just seeing a cyclical bounce back

0:35:14.520 --> 0:35:17.759
<v Speaker 1>from a very bad COVID zero recession. So you're going

0:35:17.840 --> 0:35:20.160
<v Speaker 1>to see better data for the most of twenty twenty three.

0:35:20.200 --> 0:35:21.799
<v Speaker 1>But twenty twenty three is going to be a head

0:35:21.800 --> 0:35:24.160
<v Speaker 1>fake in terms of China's growth. We're not going back

0:35:24.160 --> 0:35:27.280
<v Speaker 1>to the status quo anti things are slowing down going forward.

0:35:27.440 --> 0:35:30.080
<v Speaker 1>We had a story yesterday that apple suppliers are moving

0:35:30.080 --> 0:35:33.360
<v Speaker 1>out investing in Vietnam, looking at India. Is that going

0:35:33.440 --> 0:35:37.200
<v Speaker 1>to be a big story across manufacturing for China from

0:35:37.840 --> 0:35:40.120
<v Speaker 1>now forward. Yeah, it's a huge story. I mean, these

0:35:40.320 --> 0:35:43.520
<v Speaker 1>are difficulties there, the supply chains. Some supply chains are

0:35:43.560 --> 0:35:45.200
<v Speaker 1>being pulled out of China. They you know, they have

0:35:45.280 --> 0:35:49.960
<v Speaker 1>had extraordinary manufacturing export growth for years, mostly because of COVID,

0:35:50.000 --> 0:35:53.040
<v Speaker 1>but also because you know, you know a lot of

0:35:53.040 --> 0:35:55.399
<v Speaker 1>people were buying around the world. Now you've got more

0:35:55.440 --> 0:35:59.080
<v Speaker 1>of a global economic recession potentially looming. You know, you've

0:35:59.080 --> 0:36:01.880
<v Speaker 1>got difficulties with supply chains and being pulled out of China.

0:36:01.960 --> 0:36:04.480
<v Speaker 1>So it's gonna be a lot harder sledding in. You know,

0:36:04.520 --> 0:36:07.560
<v Speaker 1>the manufacturing world. The hope from Beijing is that they

0:36:07.560 --> 0:36:10.120
<v Speaker 1>have other sectors of the economy pick up, you know,

0:36:10.200 --> 0:36:13.799
<v Speaker 1>pick up and drive growth. But it's very unclear how

0:36:14.040 --> 0:36:16.239
<v Speaker 1>how domestic consumption is going to do that, because they're

0:36:16.280 --> 0:36:19.319
<v Speaker 1>not doing anything to support domestic consumption being a long

0:36:19.400 --> 0:36:22.759
<v Speaker 1>term structural driver of the economy. All right, Leland, great stuff.

0:36:22.800 --> 0:36:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Really appreciate getting a few minutes of your time. You

0:36:25.239 --> 0:36:27.560
<v Speaker 1>are absolutely one of our go to people as it

0:36:27.600 --> 0:36:30.960
<v Speaker 1>relates to China, both from a geopolitical perspective but also

0:36:30.960 --> 0:36:34.680
<v Speaker 1>obviously from the economic perspective. China Beige Book International, Leland Miller,

0:36:34.719 --> 0:36:36.880
<v Speaker 1>he's a CEO there and the China Base Book folks,

0:36:36.920 --> 0:36:40.520
<v Speaker 1>they have real primary data that they get from their

0:36:40.600 --> 0:36:43.680
<v Speaker 1>network of people on the ground. They don't rely on

0:36:43.840 --> 0:36:46.239
<v Speaker 1>government statistics. And so that's what I think really makes

0:36:46.840 --> 0:36:50.160
<v Speaker 1>China Beage Book and Leland Miller really compelling to chat with.

0:36:53.239 --> 0:36:56.400
<v Speaker 1>So Paul as an equities guy, right, an investment banker

0:36:56.520 --> 0:36:59.720
<v Speaker 1>from the days of your thinks everyone else is a geek. Yeah,

0:37:00.040 --> 0:37:02.480
<v Speaker 1>but he looks at fixed income. George Patterson, he's a

0:37:02.600 --> 0:37:05.800
<v Speaker 1>CIO of PGIM Quantitative Solutions. George's kind of have to

0:37:05.840 --> 0:37:09.280
<v Speaker 1>join us here in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio. George,

0:37:09.520 --> 0:37:12.239
<v Speaker 1>just start us off and tell us how you guys

0:37:12.280 --> 0:37:15.960
<v Speaker 1>at PGIM Quantitative Solutions. How do you guys invest capital

0:37:17.120 --> 0:37:19.680
<v Speaker 1>h So, thank you very much, great to be here. UM.

0:37:19.960 --> 0:37:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Our view is always trying to understand what the client's

0:37:23.560 --> 0:37:27.759
<v Speaker 1>needs are and and really for us, we always think

0:37:27.880 --> 0:37:31.720
<v Speaker 1>longer term and we always think we always think fundamentals driven.

0:37:32.040 --> 0:37:34.880
<v Speaker 1>So you know, what, what are the what are the factors,

0:37:34.920 --> 0:37:36.920
<v Speaker 1>what are the trends that are going to be rewarded

0:37:36.920 --> 0:37:39.440
<v Speaker 1>over the next full cycle, and you know, how are

0:37:39.440 --> 0:37:42.400
<v Speaker 1>we best position for that? UM and really for the

0:37:42.440 --> 0:37:44.719
<v Speaker 1>clients that really you know, there's a lot of from

0:37:44.760 --> 0:37:47.759
<v Speaker 1>our perspective, there's a lot of customization to really build

0:37:47.760 --> 0:37:50.360
<v Speaker 1>a portfolio that meets a clients have a black box

0:37:50.480 --> 0:37:55.680
<v Speaker 1>that spits out equities and fixed income options for you, Well,

0:37:55.719 --> 0:37:58.239
<v Speaker 1>it's actually not a box. It's a triangle. Okay, it's

0:37:58.280 --> 0:38:02.600
<v Speaker 1>a triangle, and it's not black, it's yellow. Okay no,

0:38:03.040 --> 0:38:05.719
<v Speaker 1>So so you know, I'm very uh I love to

0:38:05.760 --> 0:38:08.799
<v Speaker 1>say that. You know, again, from a quantitative perspective, we

0:38:08.880 --> 0:38:11.759
<v Speaker 1>do have a model that's expressed in mathematics, but it is.

0:38:12.640 --> 0:38:15.759
<v Speaker 1>Our model is very fundamentally driven. So the types of

0:38:15.840 --> 0:38:18.120
<v Speaker 1>factors that we look at are going to be very

0:38:18.120 --> 0:38:21.760
<v Speaker 1>fundamentally based, things like earnings, you know, earnings to price,

0:38:21.840 --> 0:38:26.160
<v Speaker 1>or earnings based metrics, ebidom metrics, cash flow, you know,

0:38:26.280 --> 0:38:29.840
<v Speaker 1>quality of the of a board. So we're really looking

0:38:29.880 --> 0:38:33.520
<v Speaker 1>at things that fundamentals, fundamental investors look at, but we're

0:38:33.520 --> 0:38:36.279
<v Speaker 1>doing it in a systematic way and that allows us

0:38:36.280 --> 0:38:38.640
<v Speaker 1>to just be very disciplined. That it allows us to

0:38:38.640 --> 0:38:40.720
<v Speaker 1>be disciplined, it also allows us to take the emotion

0:38:40.760 --> 0:38:42.440
<v Speaker 1>out of the process. I want to get to what

0:38:42.480 --> 0:38:47.239
<v Speaker 1>you're investing in, But before that, how did you get

0:38:47.280 --> 0:38:50.120
<v Speaker 1>to this point in your career? I mean, you went

0:38:50.160 --> 0:38:52.160
<v Speaker 1>to M I T. So I get the math part

0:38:52.200 --> 0:38:56.440
<v Speaker 1>of it, but then you did a PhD in physics.

0:38:58.400 --> 0:39:02.040
<v Speaker 1>How do you get from there to Wall Street? Essentially? Yep.

0:39:02.640 --> 0:39:06.279
<v Speaker 1>So it was it was the mid nineties, and when

0:39:06.320 --> 0:39:08.560
<v Speaker 1>I was graduating from school, it was a it was

0:39:08.600 --> 0:39:12.319
<v Speaker 1>a recession or we were emerging from a recession, and

0:39:12.480 --> 0:39:14.400
<v Speaker 1>I had an opportunity lined up. So I actually, in

0:39:14.440 --> 0:39:16.320
<v Speaker 1>addition to doing those things, I actually worked at the

0:39:16.360 --> 0:39:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California, so I can say

0:39:20.560 --> 0:39:24.680
<v Speaker 1>that I'm an honest to goodness rocket scientist. However, at

0:39:24.680 --> 0:39:27.839
<v Speaker 1>the time, I did a lot of soul searching about where,

0:39:28.000 --> 0:39:29.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, what did I want to do? And I

0:39:30.200 --> 0:39:32.440
<v Speaker 1>knew I was not going to do a traditional career,

0:39:33.719 --> 0:39:36.440
<v Speaker 1>and I looked at a couple of different things. But

0:39:36.480 --> 0:39:41.560
<v Speaker 1>I went to a presentation on quantitative investments and there

0:39:41.640 --> 0:39:45.280
<v Speaker 1>was a fellow there who was presenting some of his research,

0:39:45.880 --> 0:39:48.399
<v Speaker 1>and I kept pointing out errors in what he did,

0:39:48.960 --> 0:39:52.120
<v Speaker 1>and we had a chat afterwards and he said, well,

0:39:52.120 --> 0:39:54.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're hiring, but this is this is in

0:39:54.600 --> 0:39:56.839
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco. I was in Los Angeles at the time,

0:39:57.280 --> 0:40:00.680
<v Speaker 1>and next thing I know, I was working at bz W.

0:40:00.920 --> 0:40:04.279
<v Speaker 1>Barclay's Global Investors. That is awesome. So and from there too,

0:40:04.760 --> 0:40:08.880
<v Speaker 1>chief investment officer at PGIM Quantitative Solutions. How would you

0:40:08.960 --> 0:40:14.600
<v Speaker 1>differentiate quantitative investing from I think there must not be

0:40:14.640 --> 0:40:17.040
<v Speaker 1>a short leap to AI, which is still popular to

0:40:17.080 --> 0:40:20.759
<v Speaker 1>talk about right now. But you'd basically plug things into

0:40:20.760 --> 0:40:23.320
<v Speaker 1>a model. I guess the model just doesn't learn by itself.

0:40:23.840 --> 0:40:26.879
<v Speaker 1>So it really so the way I like to think

0:40:26.880 --> 0:40:28.799
<v Speaker 1>about it. So, if you think about the world of

0:40:28.840 --> 0:40:33.000
<v Speaker 1>fixed income right, there's people have there's like this segmentation idea.

0:40:33.080 --> 0:40:34.960
<v Speaker 1>There's people who focus on the long end of the curve.

0:40:35.000 --> 0:40:36.719
<v Speaker 1>There's people who focus on the short end of the curve.

0:40:36.760 --> 0:40:39.359
<v Speaker 1>There's people who focus in the middle. Quants are very

0:40:39.440 --> 0:40:41.680
<v Speaker 1>much the same way. There are people who look at

0:40:41.800 --> 0:40:45.440
<v Speaker 1>longer term trends, there's kind of mid horizon trends, and

0:40:45.480 --> 0:40:50.000
<v Speaker 1>then there's ultra high frequency things. So the challenge with

0:40:50.120 --> 0:40:54.320
<v Speaker 1>AI is that you need data to train the models.

0:40:54.880 --> 0:40:58.480
<v Speaker 1>And you know, the great thing about science in general

0:40:58.560 --> 0:41:00.279
<v Speaker 1>is that if you have you can do an experiment,

0:41:00.320 --> 0:41:01.920
<v Speaker 1>and if you don't have enough data, you just do

0:41:01.960 --> 0:41:05.600
<v Speaker 1>the experiment again. Um, and you can generate lots of

0:41:05.680 --> 0:41:08.960
<v Speaker 1>data to train a model. And you can do that

0:41:09.040 --> 0:41:11.960
<v Speaker 1>for short horizon models. It's very hard to do it.

0:41:11.960 --> 0:41:13.640
<v Speaker 1>We just don't have enough data to do it. For

0:41:13.800 --> 0:41:16.680
<v Speaker 1>long horizon models. There's some areas where it makes sense,

0:41:16.719 --> 0:41:19.920
<v Speaker 1>but it really depends where where you're targeting within quant

0:41:20.120 --> 0:41:23.399
<v Speaker 1>quant is kind of like saying, um, you know, you know,

0:41:24.080 --> 0:41:26.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, my boyfriend plays sports, but I don't know

0:41:26.120 --> 0:41:28.080
<v Speaker 1>what sport it is. There's a lot of difference between

0:41:28.080 --> 0:41:30.560
<v Speaker 1>a hockey player and a soccer player and a football player.

0:41:30.680 --> 0:41:32.480
<v Speaker 1>It's the same thing with quant There's a lot of

0:41:32.520 --> 0:41:36.000
<v Speaker 1>different subspecialties within there. So where are you, where's your

0:41:36.000 --> 0:41:38.879
<v Speaker 1>model focused well? And what and what are you coming

0:41:38.960 --> 0:41:41.120
<v Speaker 1>up with? Tell us about some of the ideas that

0:41:41.160 --> 0:41:45.439
<v Speaker 1>you've generated. So so all of our ideas are really

0:41:45.480 --> 0:41:48.680
<v Speaker 1>implemented by buying baskets of securities. We're not buying you know,

0:41:48.719 --> 0:41:52.480
<v Speaker 1>we're not building a concentrated portfolio. We're building a diversified portfolio.

0:41:52.960 --> 0:41:55.880
<v Speaker 1>And for us, everything has to have some sort of

0:41:56.000 --> 0:42:04.080
<v Speaker 1>route in um economic you know, economic or behavioral fundamentals,

0:42:04.080 --> 0:42:06.680
<v Speaker 1>like we need to understand why something works. And the

0:42:06.760 --> 0:42:08.560
<v Speaker 1>reason we do that, and we have a very high

0:42:08.640 --> 0:42:12.160
<v Speaker 1>bar for putting things into our models is because we

0:42:12.200 --> 0:42:13.640
<v Speaker 1>want to be We want to be able to be

0:42:13.680 --> 0:42:17.400
<v Speaker 1>patient when the market is either going against us or

0:42:17.440 --> 0:42:20.320
<v Speaker 1>in times of a crisis, because that's the one time

0:42:20.760 --> 0:42:22.600
<v Speaker 1>you don't want to panic. So we spend a lot

0:42:22.640 --> 0:42:25.880
<v Speaker 1>of time trying to understand why, why do the models

0:42:25.920 --> 0:42:29.400
<v Speaker 1>we have work, what is behind them? And that allows

0:42:29.480 --> 0:42:32.319
<v Speaker 1>us to be patient. It means that you know, like

0:42:32.640 --> 0:42:35.640
<v Speaker 1>we're we are you know, we do use valuation based

0:42:35.680 --> 0:42:38.120
<v Speaker 1>metrics and you've probably heard there was there's a period

0:42:38.120 --> 0:42:40.200
<v Speaker 1>of time that everyone was talking about is value dead?

0:42:40.280 --> 0:42:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Is value dead? And then value comes back? I think

0:42:43.040 --> 0:42:44.640
<v Speaker 1>this is the kind of thing. I can't tell you

0:42:44.719 --> 0:42:47.080
<v Speaker 1>how many times in my career I've seen somebody put

0:42:47.120 --> 0:42:49.360
<v Speaker 1>on a trade and it goes against them, and it

0:42:49.360 --> 0:42:51.720
<v Speaker 1>goes against them, and it goes against them, they decide

0:42:51.719 --> 0:42:53.799
<v Speaker 1>to take the trade off, and the next day it

0:42:53.840 --> 0:42:57.280
<v Speaker 1>starts working. So you have to be patient in this business.

0:42:58.440 --> 0:43:00.719
<v Speaker 1>It is. It is one that test you on a

0:43:00.800 --> 0:43:03.960
<v Speaker 1>daily basis. Are you buying equities here? Are they too rich?

0:43:04.000 --> 0:43:07.560
<v Speaker 1>If you're buying equities, you're buying US equities, international equities,

0:43:07.960 --> 0:43:12.080
<v Speaker 1>So from a multi asset allocation perspective, we're generally much

0:43:12.080 --> 0:43:15.520
<v Speaker 1>more positive outside the US. The US has great fundamentals,

0:43:15.520 --> 0:43:18.040
<v Speaker 1>as we all know, the economy is firing on all cylinders.

0:43:18.239 --> 0:43:20.880
<v Speaker 1>But US equities do look expensive on a number of

0:43:20.880 --> 0:43:24.080
<v Speaker 1>different metrics, so we do tend to favor non US,

0:43:24.239 --> 0:43:27.000
<v Speaker 1>whether it be EFA or EM. A lot of interesting

0:43:27.000 --> 0:43:33.239
<v Speaker 1>opportunities out there In terms of the US. What do

0:43:33.280 --> 0:43:38.200
<v Speaker 1>you see this market telling us about, you know, the economy,

0:43:38.239 --> 0:43:42.320
<v Speaker 1>the possibility of becoming recession. You know, earnings seem to

0:43:42.520 --> 0:43:45.960
<v Speaker 1>paint a far worse picture than the data that we're

0:43:46.000 --> 0:43:51.719
<v Speaker 1>getting from unemployment and prices paid impmiyes. Like everything looks

0:43:51.760 --> 0:43:54.080
<v Speaker 1>so great, and then you look at earnings and they

0:43:54.160 --> 0:43:57.080
<v Speaker 1>not only were disappointing, but expectations are for them to

0:43:57.120 --> 0:44:00.759
<v Speaker 1>disappoint more throughout the year. Yeah, but look look where

0:44:00.760 --> 0:44:03.279
<v Speaker 1>we've come. Look where we come from, right, you know,

0:44:03.320 --> 0:44:07.719
<v Speaker 1>we came from COVID where like literally, you know, unemployment

0:44:07.840 --> 0:44:10.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, was going through the roof. I mean the

0:44:10.000 --> 0:44:13.480
<v Speaker 1>economy came to a stop. Right, Planes basically stopped flying,

0:44:13.760 --> 0:44:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Cruise ships like basically couldn't take paslengers on. So the

0:44:17.040 --> 0:44:20.560
<v Speaker 1>economy literally came to a stop. And we you know,

0:44:20.600 --> 0:44:24.960
<v Speaker 1>the economy was rescued with with stimulus and it it

0:44:25.160 --> 0:44:27.320
<v Speaker 1>there was kind of a very strong rebound, particularly in

0:44:27.400 --> 0:44:30.080
<v Speaker 1>certain sector of the economy, the stay at home, the

0:44:30.200 --> 0:44:33.319
<v Speaker 1>technology stocks, and what you're seeing now is kind of

0:44:33.360 --> 0:44:35.920
<v Speaker 1>like the this is I don't want to say it's

0:44:35.960 --> 0:44:38.800
<v Speaker 1>the hangover, but you know, we're seeing a lot of repercussions.

0:44:38.800 --> 0:44:42.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, so like the US economy is actually very healthy,

0:44:42.400 --> 0:44:44.759
<v Speaker 1>but like we're seeing a bit of a reversal in

0:44:44.800 --> 0:44:47.560
<v Speaker 1>some of the corporate earnings. I don't think it's a surprise.

0:44:47.640 --> 0:44:49.840
<v Speaker 1>I think this is all given. This is what I

0:44:49.880 --> 0:44:53.880
<v Speaker 1>just mean. We're pricing uh eighteen times earnings is great.

0:44:54.560 --> 0:44:56.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, that's not a hangover. This is if No,

0:44:56.719 --> 0:44:59.359
<v Speaker 1>it's not love that kind of hangover. No. No, well

0:44:59.400 --> 0:45:02.040
<v Speaker 1>it was even or during in twenty you know, after

0:45:02.160 --> 0:45:04.799
<v Speaker 1>post COVID, right, I mean when everything was up. I mean,

0:45:04.840 --> 0:45:07.280
<v Speaker 1>just look at the total return of the market post COVID.

0:45:07.320 --> 0:45:10.040
<v Speaker 1>It was phenomenal from the bottom to the top. Was like,

0:45:10.080 --> 0:45:12.799
<v Speaker 1>it was an amazing It was an amazing thing. Now

0:45:13.239 --> 0:45:15.320
<v Speaker 1>there are parts of the economy that move a little slower,

0:45:15.400 --> 0:45:18.239
<v Speaker 1>like housing. Right. Like housing, we saw prices, you know,

0:45:18.360 --> 0:45:22.360
<v Speaker 1>dramatically change over the course of over the course of COVID.

0:45:22.560 --> 0:45:24.759
<v Speaker 1>That's going to take longer. Housing market just does not

0:45:24.960 --> 0:45:28.360
<v Speaker 1>adapt that quickly. But the US economy is very healthy.

0:45:28.400 --> 0:45:31.879
<v Speaker 1>It's just that equities are expensive. I am a little

0:45:31.920 --> 0:45:33.880
<v Speaker 1>concerned that the FED is going to have to continue

0:45:33.960 --> 0:45:37.319
<v Speaker 1>raising rates. As I said, I'm a rocket scientist and

0:45:37.800 --> 0:45:41.359
<v Speaker 1>not an economist by trees training. But every indication we've seen,

0:45:41.480 --> 0:45:44.200
<v Speaker 1>apart from a handful of senior apart from a handful

0:45:44.239 --> 0:45:46.879
<v Speaker 1>of large tech companies that have announced some layoffs, it's

0:45:46.920 --> 0:45:49.399
<v Speaker 1>still hard to find good people. I think companies want

0:45:49.400 --> 0:45:52.240
<v Speaker 1>to hold on to their employees. All right, good stuff,

0:45:52.239 --> 0:45:55.719
<v Speaker 1>George Patterson. We really appreciate getting your thoughts there. George Patterson.

0:45:55.760 --> 0:46:01.240
<v Speaker 1>He's a chief investment officer for PJIM Quantitative Solutions. Joining

0:46:01.280 --> 0:46:04.040
<v Speaker 1>us live here in our Bloomberg Interactive broker's studio. Church

0:46:04.120 --> 0:46:08.680
<v Speaker 1>are based in Boston, Boston and Newark, New Jersey. Here

0:46:08.680 --> 0:46:11.359
<v Speaker 1>we go, boom, all right, Boston, only the nicest, only

0:46:11.400 --> 0:46:14.040
<v Speaker 1>the nicest towns on the East Coast exactly. I love Newark,

0:46:14.160 --> 0:46:17.520
<v Speaker 1>the Iron Bound, all that good stuff, great restaurants. George,

0:46:17.520 --> 0:46:21.960
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining CHERL. I want to get

0:46:22.000 --> 0:46:27.000
<v Speaker 1>over to someone who knows what's going down in commodities

0:46:27.480 --> 0:46:32.880
<v Speaker 1>and from a city that has been historically an amazing

0:46:33.000 --> 0:46:37.040
<v Speaker 1>commodities hub. I'm Goola. Zeidler joins US vice president Investor

0:46:37.040 --> 0:46:41.279
<v Speaker 1>Relations over at Arubis. They are the largest copper producer

0:46:41.280 --> 0:46:45.360
<v Speaker 1>in Europe, the largest copper recycler worldwide, and they're based

0:46:45.400 --> 0:46:49.640
<v Speaker 1>in Hamburg. I'mngola, thanks so much for joining us. First

0:46:49.680 --> 0:46:56.240
<v Speaker 1>of all, is your family historically from Hamburg? Because Seidler

0:46:56.480 --> 0:46:58.480
<v Speaker 1>sounds to me like someone who makes things out of

0:46:58.520 --> 0:47:02.840
<v Speaker 1>silk and I think of Hamburg as this commodities hub.

0:47:03.239 --> 0:47:06.319
<v Speaker 1>So is this is this where it comes from? No?

0:47:06.520 --> 0:47:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Actually not, I'm sorry for bath And actually it's the

0:47:09.680 --> 0:47:11.719
<v Speaker 1>name of my husband, so I don't really know where

0:47:11.760 --> 0:47:16.719
<v Speaker 1>it comes from. As you said, As you said, I'm

0:47:16.760 --> 0:47:19.600
<v Speaker 1>located in Hamburg. It's almost evening here, so good morning

0:47:19.640 --> 0:47:23.560
<v Speaker 1>to you. Ah, yes, yeah, you've you're later in the

0:47:23.640 --> 0:47:27.239
<v Speaker 1>day there. Um, let's talk about the commodities that that

0:47:27.400 --> 0:47:32.239
<v Speaker 1>you move around, make and move around. I would have

0:47:32.320 --> 0:47:35.239
<v Speaker 1>expected the China reopening, and Paul and I have been

0:47:35.239 --> 0:47:40.000
<v Speaker 1>talking about this for months now since the COVID zero

0:47:40.480 --> 0:47:43.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of pivot that they made. I would have expected

0:47:43.280 --> 0:47:46.440
<v Speaker 1>that to drive up commodities prices across the board. What

0:47:46.520 --> 0:47:48.879
<v Speaker 1>does doctor Copper look like right now? What does doctor

0:47:48.920 --> 0:47:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Copper telling us? Well, actually, I think we have to well,

0:47:54.440 --> 0:47:56.440
<v Speaker 1>I first of all want to talk about a Europea

0:47:56.560 --> 0:47:59.160
<v Speaker 1>view another that come to a Chinese view, because of

0:47:59.200 --> 0:48:03.480
<v Speaker 1>course we're looking at the market globally. So the European

0:48:03.600 --> 0:48:07.359
<v Speaker 1>demand for copper is very healthy. You know, we are

0:48:07.360 --> 0:48:11.160
<v Speaker 1>one of the leading copper producers in Europe and globally.

0:48:11.520 --> 0:48:16.080
<v Speaker 1>So here and driven by the energy green energy transition,

0:48:16.200 --> 0:48:20.640
<v Speaker 1>the electronic vehicles and all of this, the copper is

0:48:20.719 --> 0:48:24.480
<v Speaker 1>really copper demand in Europe is really healthy. We see

0:48:24.520 --> 0:48:27.879
<v Speaker 1>today that the copper price again goes went up over

0:48:28.040 --> 0:48:32.480
<v Speaker 1>nine thousand US tolop ton, meaning that the mind supply

0:48:32.840 --> 0:48:37.279
<v Speaker 1>of concentrate materials where we generate our copper from, is

0:48:37.680 --> 0:48:41.919
<v Speaker 1>in a good situation. And also the recycling markets here

0:48:42.000 --> 0:48:45.920
<v Speaker 1>in Europe, where we of course are engaged also all right,

0:48:45.960 --> 0:48:49.919
<v Speaker 1>So when you're when you're when you go to visit

0:48:49.960 --> 0:48:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Oliver Bloomer and Wolfsburg, is he putting in orders for

0:48:54.200 --> 0:48:56.399
<v Speaker 1>copper that he can now afford to pay for because

0:48:56.400 --> 0:48:59.320
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't need to fork out so much cash for gas.

0:48:59.400 --> 0:49:01.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there is an expectation that that would be

0:49:01.440 --> 0:49:04.960
<v Speaker 1>a huge problem. Now it's not. And Folkswagen nimes to

0:49:05.000 --> 0:49:07.359
<v Speaker 1>be the biggest maker of electric vehicles in the world.

0:49:08.640 --> 0:49:11.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that that is counting in for them as well.

0:49:11.040 --> 0:49:13.800
<v Speaker 1>But from our point of view, we see that the

0:49:14.280 --> 0:49:19.479
<v Speaker 1>construction industry is demand is increasing, and automotive from our

0:49:19.800 --> 0:49:24.240
<v Speaker 1>today's perspective, is stable. But you are right, energy prices

0:49:24.239 --> 0:49:26.720
<v Speaker 1>are coming down in Europe. We had a mild winter

0:49:26.840 --> 0:49:30.560
<v Speaker 1>here for God's sake, so energy prices are going down

0:49:30.600 --> 0:49:34.360
<v Speaker 1>and this of course will given tailwind to all the

0:49:36.520 --> 0:49:43.560
<v Speaker 1>let's say commodities consuming companies. But on the other hand side,

0:49:43.960 --> 0:49:46.799
<v Speaker 1>if you look at it globally, and we've got a

0:49:46.800 --> 0:49:52.799
<v Speaker 1>lot of customers which which have maybe facing supply chain disruptions.

0:49:52.840 --> 0:49:57.719
<v Speaker 1>So currently we don't see it. But I'm we are

0:49:57.760 --> 0:50:01.040
<v Speaker 1>happy here in our European market. Demand is still a

0:50:01.080 --> 0:50:04.680
<v Speaker 1>stable and healthy For US, situation might be different than

0:50:04.680 --> 0:50:07.640
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned that at the beginning. In China, we see,

0:50:07.640 --> 0:50:11.799
<v Speaker 1>as you mentioned that the demand didn't pick up as

0:50:11.840 --> 0:50:16.520
<v Speaker 1>we earlier the year expected. That that might be because

0:50:16.600 --> 0:50:20.320
<v Speaker 1>of we had a long Chinese New Year and after

0:50:20.440 --> 0:50:25.080
<v Speaker 1>COVID the markets are slowly picking up, but not in

0:50:25.160 --> 0:50:29.279
<v Speaker 1>that direction which we maybe earlier the year expected. I'm

0:50:29.320 --> 0:50:32.080
<v Speaker 1>going to talk to us about the recycling business, the

0:50:32.160 --> 0:50:34.759
<v Speaker 1>copper recycling marketplace, if you could just kind of lay

0:50:34.760 --> 0:50:37.839
<v Speaker 1>out the primers, what that market looks like, kind of

0:50:38.239 --> 0:50:43.239
<v Speaker 1>in kind of how you see that developing. Actually, we

0:50:43.600 --> 0:50:47.040
<v Speaker 1>last year and announced that we are doing a huge

0:50:47.160 --> 0:50:50.880
<v Speaker 1>recycling investment for US and we huge recycling investment in

0:50:50.920 --> 0:50:54.239
<v Speaker 1>the US and Augusta in Georgia. We will invest six

0:50:54.320 --> 0:51:00.000
<v Speaker 1>hundred forty million euros in a big plant of recycling materials,

0:50:59.800 --> 0:51:04.080
<v Speaker 1>and we are doing this not because of the lower

0:51:04.200 --> 0:51:07.960
<v Speaker 1>energy prices in the US. That's nice as well, but

0:51:08.040 --> 0:51:12.680
<v Speaker 1>the market for recycling material is extremely growing in the

0:51:12.800 --> 0:51:16.480
<v Speaker 1>United States and Arugus will be the first recycling company

0:51:16.960 --> 0:51:21.520
<v Speaker 1>investing there and building the first recycling plant in the US.

0:51:21.600 --> 0:51:25.960
<v Speaker 1>So big opportunity for us in a fast growing market.

0:51:26.440 --> 0:51:29.560
<v Speaker 1>What kind of energy usage does it take to recycle

0:51:29.640 --> 0:51:37.480
<v Speaker 1>copper actually doesn't matter. Well, we have different energy. We

0:51:37.800 --> 0:51:42.960
<v Speaker 1>have a gas, we have what everything you can imagine

0:51:43.000 --> 0:51:46.840
<v Speaker 1>we do have and we were facing at the beginning

0:51:46.960 --> 0:51:51.600
<v Speaker 1>of the year high energy increase, especially price increase, especially

0:51:51.680 --> 0:51:55.640
<v Speaker 1>in Germany situation in other European countries where we produce

0:51:55.719 --> 0:51:59.000
<v Speaker 1>as well, we're different. But in the US, of course,

0:51:59.320 --> 0:52:02.560
<v Speaker 1>this is much more competitive for us, the energy situation

0:52:02.600 --> 0:52:05.200
<v Speaker 1>than we have it here because you are using nuclear

0:52:05.239 --> 0:52:09.480
<v Speaker 1>power plants as well, and this is something which you

0:52:09.560 --> 0:52:12.640
<v Speaker 1>know probably don't want to have here in Germany anymore.

0:52:13.320 --> 0:52:16.440
<v Speaker 1>So I'm gona. I know your first quarter earnings profit

0:52:16.480 --> 0:52:20.920
<v Speaker 1>fellos doing part too inflation and higher energy prices. Talk

0:52:20.960 --> 0:52:23.680
<v Speaker 1>to us about the cost side of your business. What

0:52:23.719 --> 0:52:26.520
<v Speaker 1>are the big costs and kind of what are the

0:52:26.560 --> 0:52:32.440
<v Speaker 1>trends there well. Costs, of course is personnel costs is

0:52:33.000 --> 0:52:36.520
<v Speaker 1>the biggest factor here and as we are facing high

0:52:36.600 --> 0:52:39.799
<v Speaker 1>inflation rate even in Germany they announced just that we

0:52:39.880 --> 0:52:44.680
<v Speaker 1>are at eight point seven percent, so all over Europe

0:52:45.040 --> 0:52:48.840
<v Speaker 1>this is something we have to face. But energy costs

0:52:48.920 --> 0:52:52.480
<v Speaker 1>our highest factor. And if you look at last year,

0:52:52.520 --> 0:52:57.080
<v Speaker 1>our fiscal year of September, the energy cost almost doubled.

0:52:57.719 --> 0:52:59.840
<v Speaker 1>We see now that it is coming up and we

0:53:00.360 --> 0:53:04.160
<v Speaker 1>had in our forecast a little bit room here. So

0:53:04.880 --> 0:53:08.399
<v Speaker 1>currently the situation is better and we are very well

0:53:08.440 --> 0:53:11.920
<v Speaker 1>supplied with energy with long term contracts and it is

0:53:12.120 --> 0:53:15.440
<v Speaker 1>not at that with position as we've seen it before.

0:53:15.680 --> 0:53:18.040
<v Speaker 1>And I talked to a lot of investors last year

0:53:18.440 --> 0:53:21.000
<v Speaker 1>about the situation of energy in Germany and I can

0:53:21.080 --> 0:53:23.960
<v Speaker 1>say we are now much more relaxed on that side.

0:53:24.800 --> 0:53:27.000
<v Speaker 1>In China, the reopening we were going to we put

0:53:27.000 --> 0:53:29.520
<v Speaker 1>a pin in that. So let's go back. Is it

0:53:29.560 --> 0:53:33.920
<v Speaker 1>expected to be drive demand in a big way? Actually,

0:53:34.239 --> 0:53:37.799
<v Speaker 1>I would say of course it will. Our Rubis is

0:53:37.880 --> 0:53:41.800
<v Speaker 1>not engaged in any kind of direct business to China,

0:53:41.880 --> 0:53:44.920
<v Speaker 1>but we are, of course depending because fifty percent of

0:53:44.960 --> 0:53:48.520
<v Speaker 1>the global demand and copper is in China is coming

0:53:48.560 --> 0:53:51.920
<v Speaker 1>from China. So the Chinese are of course driving the

0:53:52.040 --> 0:53:56.759
<v Speaker 1>copper price, and we and the mining industry especially, we

0:53:56.800 --> 0:54:01.400
<v Speaker 1>don't have any minds. It's if they earn good money

0:54:01.600 --> 0:54:03.680
<v Speaker 1>by a high copper price, it is good for us.

0:54:03.800 --> 0:54:06.400
<v Speaker 1>They create a lot of copper concentrate and this is

0:54:06.440 --> 0:54:09.000
<v Speaker 1>perfect for us on the other hand. Site so we

0:54:09.120 --> 0:54:11.839
<v Speaker 1>are we are looking at China very closely, have good

0:54:11.840 --> 0:54:16.120
<v Speaker 1>contact over there, but currently we see that the demand

0:54:16.280 --> 0:54:19.840
<v Speaker 1>is still weak and the premium before we find copa allow.

0:54:20.160 --> 0:54:22.279
<v Speaker 1>All right, I'm gla. Thank you so much for joining us.

0:54:22.280 --> 0:54:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Really appreciate you taking the time. Angola Seidler, vice president

0:54:25.480 --> 0:54:28.360
<v Speaker 1>of invest Relations for a Rubis. It is the largest

0:54:28.400 --> 0:54:31.520
<v Speaker 1>copper producer in Europe and the largest copper recycler worldwide.

0:54:31.800 --> 0:54:35.760
<v Speaker 1>They're based in Hamburg, Germany, so excellent getting the European

0:54:35.960 --> 0:54:41.200
<v Speaker 1>perspective on that commodities. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg

0:54:41.239 --> 0:54:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Markets podcast. You can subscribe and listen to interviews of

0:54:44.719 --> 0:54:49.480
<v Speaker 1>Apple podcasts or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller.

0:54:49.760 --> 0:54:53.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at Matt Miller nineteen seventy three. I'm

0:54:53.480 --> 0:54:56.560
<v Speaker 1>fall Sweeney. I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney before the podcast.

0:54:56.600 --> 0:55:00.320
<v Speaker 1>You can always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio