WEBVTT - Spotify's Revenue Miss and Musk Weighs In on X

0:00:01.480 --> 0:00:03.840
<v Speaker 1>From the heart where Innovation of Money and.

0:00:03.920 --> 0:00:08.959
<v Speaker 2>Power Collie in Silicon Valley, NBN. This is Bloomberg Technology

0:00:09.039 --> 0:00:11.119
<v Speaker 2>with Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlow.

0:00:25.040 --> 0:00:27.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm Caroline Heinde, a Bloomberg's World headquarters in New York.

0:00:27.640 --> 0:00:30.920
<v Speaker 3>Ed Ludlow is off today. This is Bloomberg Technology coming up.

0:00:31.000 --> 0:00:34.640
<v Speaker 3>Full earnings coverage ahead. We wrap Spotify's results and push

0:00:34.680 --> 0:00:37.479
<v Speaker 3>your head to the all important alphabet Microsoft and Snap

0:00:38.240 --> 0:00:41.199
<v Speaker 3>Plus what does Twitter's change to x I mean for

0:00:41.240 --> 0:00:44.880
<v Speaker 3>the company's brand value? Will break down the potential implications

0:00:45.479 --> 0:00:48.519
<v Speaker 3>and how is AI rewriting the rules for the two

0:00:48.640 --> 0:00:51.360
<v Speaker 3>hundred billion dollar gaming industry. We'll sit down with Super

0:00:51.440 --> 0:00:54.480
<v Speaker 3>League Gaming CEO and a hand for her thoughts. The

0:00:54.600 --> 0:00:56.840
<v Speaker 3>first big week for earnings. What is one hundred and

0:00:56.880 --> 0:00:59.319
<v Speaker 3>seventy companies reporting this week? But the two who want

0:00:59.320 --> 0:01:01.760
<v Speaker 3>to keep an eye on to Microsoft alphabet is also

0:01:01.800 --> 0:01:04.319
<v Speaker 3>going to be Snap as cool as well. Let's let's

0:01:04.319 --> 0:01:06.360
<v Speaker 3>dig into some of the key AI plays with Anna

0:01:06.400 --> 0:01:08.760
<v Speaker 3>Agrana from Roomberg Intelligence, who I'm pleased to say is

0:01:09.400 --> 0:01:11.480
<v Speaker 3>on the all important week right here in the New

0:01:11.560 --> 0:01:15.280
<v Speaker 3>York studio and the rallies have been hard. What forty

0:01:15.280 --> 0:01:17.600
<v Speaker 3>five percent at least for Microsoft so far this year.

0:01:17.959 --> 0:01:20.280
<v Speaker 3>The valuations must make a few people question whether they

0:01:20.319 --> 0:01:21.000
<v Speaker 3>can live up to it.

0:01:21.400 --> 0:01:21.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:01:21.640 --> 0:01:23.840
<v Speaker 4>I think that's why, you know, we'll see tonight when

0:01:23.880 --> 0:01:26.399
<v Speaker 4>the cloud results come out, is whether there is any

0:01:26.480 --> 0:01:29.240
<v Speaker 4>kind of a push from the increased use do chat

0:01:29.280 --> 0:01:33.480
<v Speaker 4>GPD or is that offset by week corporate spending. And

0:01:33.520 --> 0:01:36.200
<v Speaker 4>I think that remains the biggest question for Microsoft. They

0:01:36.200 --> 0:01:38.320
<v Speaker 4>have to come out and defend their cloud numbers and

0:01:38.360 --> 0:01:41.080
<v Speaker 4>showcase that there should be an improvement in that over

0:01:41.120 --> 0:01:44.080
<v Speaker 4>the next twelve months for you know, this valuation to.

0:01:44.040 --> 0:01:47.880
<v Speaker 3>Hold and so maybe looking forward to when AI can

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:50.480
<v Speaker 3>start to be revenue generating. But when we look at Alphabet,

0:01:50.760 --> 0:01:53.440
<v Speaker 3>everyone's been worried about whether it's been a competitive threat

0:01:53.480 --> 0:01:54.480
<v Speaker 3>to their search business.

0:01:55.080 --> 0:01:56.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, but I think that's too soon to call that.

0:01:56.960 --> 0:01:58.800
<v Speaker 4>It's going to take a while before all of these

0:01:58.840 --> 0:02:02.120
<v Speaker 4>things really, you know, play out. Microsoft is behind on

0:02:02.160 --> 0:02:04.000
<v Speaker 4>search and I don't think that they can catch up

0:02:04.000 --> 0:02:06.600
<v Speaker 4>in a quarter or so. You know, it's it's very

0:02:06.600 --> 0:02:09.160
<v Speaker 4>impressive to see what the chat GPT has been able

0:02:09.200 --> 0:02:11.239
<v Speaker 4>to do, but you know, habits are not going to

0:02:11.320 --> 0:02:13.200
<v Speaker 4>change overnight. It's going to take some time for that

0:02:13.240 --> 0:02:15.880
<v Speaker 4>to happen. But as I said, cloud business is where

0:02:15.960 --> 0:02:19.639
<v Speaker 4>it really gets defined for Microsoft because if you look

0:02:19.680 --> 0:02:22.360
<v Speaker 4>at it, Azure's growth was forty seven percent a year ago,

0:02:22.720 --> 0:02:25.160
<v Speaker 4>It's going to be around twenty six twenty seven percent today,

0:02:25.320 --> 0:02:28.040
<v Speaker 4>So it's a massive drop from that high bar. But

0:02:28.120 --> 0:02:30.639
<v Speaker 4>the question is is this the quarter where this we

0:02:30.800 --> 0:02:32.840
<v Speaker 4>know we see the bottom and we start to see

0:02:32.840 --> 0:02:34.800
<v Speaker 4>a U turn next quarter or is it going to

0:02:34.840 --> 0:02:36.760
<v Speaker 4>take another quarter or two for that to play out.

0:02:36.880 --> 0:02:39.000
<v Speaker 4>And I think that will be driven by comments from

0:02:39.040 --> 0:02:42.600
<v Speaker 4>the CEO and the CFO, is that the new AI

0:02:42.639 --> 0:02:45.680
<v Speaker 4>workloads are they really coming, you know, with a lot

0:02:45.720 --> 0:02:47.600
<v Speaker 4>of momentum, or we are still going to be a

0:02:47.600 --> 0:02:48.560
<v Speaker 4>while before we see that.

0:02:49.320 --> 0:02:52.000
<v Speaker 3>Looks at Microsoft, of course we're anticipating hopefully that the

0:02:52.000 --> 0:02:54.200
<v Speaker 3>bottom is in for advertising when we look at what

0:02:54.280 --> 0:02:56.640
<v Speaker 3>Alphabet's going to be pulling in great setup for US

0:02:56.680 --> 0:02:59.120
<v Speaker 3>and Agarana on all things Microsoft and of course some

0:02:59.120 --> 0:03:01.760
<v Speaker 3>of the other big beasts all love you out there,

0:03:01.840 --> 0:03:04.040
<v Speaker 3>is that actually maybe these big beasts to run too far,

0:03:04.240 --> 0:03:05.840
<v Speaker 3>Maybe you need to be cautious on some of the

0:03:05.880 --> 0:03:08.680
<v Speaker 3>magnificent seven Cafmoon Navaria is one of those voices. Chief

0:03:08.680 --> 0:03:12.640
<v Speaker 3>Market stretchgist over at Stonext Group and Catherine, how are

0:03:12.720 --> 0:03:16.040
<v Speaker 3>you trading? How are you thinking ahead of these big,

0:03:16.200 --> 0:03:17.280
<v Speaker 3>all important results.

0:03:18.560 --> 0:03:21.560
<v Speaker 5>Well, we have earnings this week coming up with some

0:03:21.639 --> 0:03:26.119
<v Speaker 5>of the major powerhouses and Microsoft and Visa and Verizon

0:03:26.480 --> 0:03:30.200
<v Speaker 5>across the board. You have some big names reporting earnings,

0:03:30.240 --> 0:03:33.280
<v Speaker 5>some which are ech between twenty and twenty three percent

0:03:33.320 --> 0:03:37.960
<v Speaker 5>of their respective ETF and indexes within the communications sector,

0:03:38.040 --> 0:03:40.600
<v Speaker 5>within technology. So it's going to be very important that

0:03:40.640 --> 0:03:44.080
<v Speaker 5>these beat for the market to continue to move higher.

0:03:44.360 --> 0:03:45.440
<v Speaker 3>They are likely to do so.

0:03:45.480 --> 0:03:48.720
<v Speaker 5>But what I would say is that we're at the precipice,

0:03:48.840 --> 0:03:50.040
<v Speaker 5>or we're at the very.

0:03:49.880 --> 0:03:51.800
<v Speaker 3>Peak of where we are.

0:03:52.000 --> 0:03:56.240
<v Speaker 5>Anticipating the Fed to stay on hold. Everyone's expecting twenty

0:03:56.280 --> 0:03:58.960
<v Speaker 5>five basis points tomorrow and then on hold for a

0:03:58.960 --> 0:04:02.119
<v Speaker 5>good amount of time. My expectation, however, is that if

0:04:02.160 --> 0:04:04.520
<v Speaker 5>the consumer remains as strong as it has Caroline, we

0:04:04.560 --> 0:04:07.440
<v Speaker 5>had consumer confidence commit at the highest in two years today,

0:04:07.560 --> 0:04:09.520
<v Speaker 5>then it's going to be very difficult for the FED

0:04:09.560 --> 0:04:11.920
<v Speaker 5>to get to that two percent target with service sector

0:04:11.920 --> 0:04:14.600
<v Speaker 5>inflation as robus as that is and will continue to be.

0:04:15.000 --> 0:04:17.080
<v Speaker 5>If that's the case and the FED has to hike again,

0:04:17.279 --> 0:04:20.080
<v Speaker 5>then this is negative for those highly interest rate sensitive

0:04:20.720 --> 0:04:25.400
<v Speaker 5>sectors and stocks which are the biggest heavyweights in the indices.

0:04:26.360 --> 0:04:29.200
<v Speaker 3>So good that you put it in the macro context.

0:04:29.400 --> 0:04:32.440
<v Speaker 3>I'm therefore interested in if you have ridden this wave,

0:04:32.839 --> 0:04:35.880
<v Speaker 3>the Magnificent seven, the big AI trade, do you have

0:04:35.960 --> 0:04:38.960
<v Speaker 3>to now protect the downside? Do you stop profit taking?

0:04:40.520 --> 0:04:42.800
<v Speaker 5>Well, it's a good moment to at least play the laggards,

0:04:42.800 --> 0:04:45.400
<v Speaker 5>and what we've seen is some of those laggards catch up.

0:04:45.440 --> 0:04:47.560
<v Speaker 5>This is the catch up trade is the definition of

0:04:47.600 --> 0:04:50.240
<v Speaker 5>so so it's really been tech and specifically AI that

0:04:50.279 --> 0:04:52.440
<v Speaker 5>has led the market rally year to date. We have

0:04:52.560 --> 0:04:57.479
<v Speaker 5>not seen material appreciation in materials or banks or industrials

0:04:57.680 --> 0:05:00.920
<v Speaker 5>until today, so we are seeing industrials jump quite a bit.

0:05:01.160 --> 0:05:03.640
<v Speaker 5>We at stoneacks have a really big commodity section, and

0:05:03.680 --> 0:05:07.360
<v Speaker 5>the guys are more enthusiastic with regard to possible demand

0:05:07.400 --> 0:05:10.560
<v Speaker 5>for these materials. If China does in fact come with

0:05:10.720 --> 0:05:15.520
<v Speaker 5>a material or a significant infrastructure or stimulus package of

0:05:15.560 --> 0:05:18.960
<v Speaker 5>some sort, so I would say, play the catch up trade,

0:05:18.960 --> 0:05:22.839
<v Speaker 5>Play the laggards, the cyclical laggards that will benefit from

0:05:22.960 --> 0:05:26.280
<v Speaker 5>what could be a very good print on Friday. If

0:05:26.279 --> 0:05:29.000
<v Speaker 5>we get core PC coming at less than four point six,

0:05:29.000 --> 0:05:31.799
<v Speaker 5>where it's kind of been for a significant period of time,

0:05:32.000 --> 0:05:34.520
<v Speaker 5>maybe four point one four point two. Then that's going

0:05:34.600 --> 0:05:38.520
<v Speaker 5>to be additional boost for the the for the long

0:05:38.600 --> 0:05:41.360
<v Speaker 5>risk trade, which is in my view, the most overcrowded

0:05:41.400 --> 0:05:44.760
<v Speaker 5>trade today. So yes, there are potential to still play

0:05:44.760 --> 0:05:49.680
<v Speaker 5>this rally, but I would advise clients that everything is cyclical.

0:05:49.960 --> 0:05:52.360
<v Speaker 5>We are in an economic cycle, and in my view,

0:05:52.400 --> 0:05:55.039
<v Speaker 5>the next phase of the economic cycle is going to

0:05:55.080 --> 0:05:57.680
<v Speaker 5>be recession. Timing is the tricky point.

0:05:58.240 --> 0:05:59.800
<v Speaker 3>And it's that global recession.

0:06:02.480 --> 0:06:05.080
<v Speaker 5>Well, you know, I think it's meaningful to talk about

0:06:05.120 --> 0:06:10.080
<v Speaker 5>different stages. So perhaps the US enters recession after Europe does,

0:06:10.200 --> 0:06:13.279
<v Speaker 5>or China enters slow down, So there's different phases, so

0:06:13.320 --> 0:06:14.920
<v Speaker 5>it doesn't have to all happen at once, and we

0:06:14.960 --> 0:06:17.719
<v Speaker 5>shouldn't expect it to. But I do believe that these

0:06:17.839 --> 0:06:21.320
<v Speaker 5>delayed impacts, and everyone talks about the infast, infamous, long

0:06:21.400 --> 0:06:26.760
<v Speaker 5>and long and prolonged impact of monetary policy in a

0:06:26.839 --> 0:06:30.520
<v Speaker 5>data dependent FED doesn't really mesh. So what I would

0:06:30.560 --> 0:06:33.040
<v Speaker 5>say is, look on Friday's number. Friday's number is probably

0:06:33.040 --> 0:06:34.720
<v Speaker 5>going to be very good, and I would say Thursday

0:06:34.760 --> 0:06:37.760
<v Speaker 5>and Friday with second quarter, GDP, Caroline and core PC

0:06:37.839 --> 0:06:40.200
<v Speaker 5>coming in respectively Thursday and Friday are going to need

0:06:40.279 --> 0:06:44.719
<v Speaker 5>more important data points than Wednesday's very well expected twenty

0:06:44.720 --> 0:06:47.840
<v Speaker 5>five basis point hike. If the United States is or

0:06:47.880 --> 0:06:50.560
<v Speaker 5>if the Federal Reserve is really serious about its two

0:06:50.600 --> 0:06:53.960
<v Speaker 5>percent target doesn't change, it isn't complacent with a three

0:06:54.080 --> 0:06:57.200
<v Speaker 5>handle or a high two handle, then we could get

0:06:57.240 --> 0:06:59.800
<v Speaker 5>an additional additional hike. And if that's the case, then

0:06:59.800 --> 0:07:03.320
<v Speaker 5>we're talking five hundred and fifty basis points maybe more

0:07:03.360 --> 0:07:07.240
<v Speaker 5>in total rate hikes that will start to affect the

0:07:07.279 --> 0:07:10.240
<v Speaker 5>credit cycle. We're already seeing some difficulty with regard to

0:07:10.280 --> 0:07:11.960
<v Speaker 5>payments in the real economy.

0:07:12.080 --> 0:07:15.440
<v Speaker 3>Causin just how many of your clients are wanting to

0:07:15.440 --> 0:07:18.640
<v Speaker 3>play the AI tech trade, how many of them feel

0:07:18.760 --> 0:07:21.200
<v Speaker 3>they've missed it, how many of them feel that there's

0:07:21.240 --> 0:07:23.160
<v Speaker 3>other names they could look at, other than some of

0:07:23.160 --> 0:07:24.600
<v Speaker 3>the really big tech heavyweights.

0:07:26.040 --> 0:07:28.280
<v Speaker 5>Well at so next, we do cover a wide breath.

0:07:28.280 --> 0:07:32.240
<v Speaker 5>So it's everything from commodities to tech, to securities to

0:07:33.280 --> 0:07:35.640
<v Speaker 5>globle payments and clearing. So it's a massive company. We

0:07:35.680 --> 0:07:38.040
<v Speaker 5>have four thousand people and it's a fortune one hundred

0:07:38.040 --> 0:07:40.200
<v Speaker 5>and that is deck listed actually, but a lot of

0:07:40.240 --> 0:07:43.320
<v Speaker 5>clients are keen on following this trend, and you know,

0:07:43.560 --> 0:07:45.680
<v Speaker 5>they follow the buck. So what I would say is

0:07:45.840 --> 0:07:48.160
<v Speaker 5>there's a lot of interest with regard to the laggards,

0:07:48.200 --> 0:07:51.120
<v Speaker 5>looking at the small caps which have lagged, for example,

0:07:51.200 --> 0:07:54.400
<v Speaker 5>the triple ques in a very meaningful way. So there's

0:07:54.480 --> 0:07:58.480
<v Speaker 5>interest in finding ways to play this momentum driven multiple

0:07:58.480 --> 0:08:02.280
<v Speaker 5>expansion driven rally without getting into the high flyers at

0:08:02.320 --> 0:08:06.080
<v Speaker 5>exorbitant multiples. And my contention on Caroline is that the

0:08:06.120 --> 0:08:10.800
<v Speaker 5>growth sector, specifically AI in tech, is trading at exorbitant multiples.

0:08:11.320 --> 0:08:13.400
<v Speaker 3>And I sort of asked a little bit about hedging.

0:08:13.480 --> 0:08:16.320
<v Speaker 3>You sort of gave this very thoughtful response about well,

0:08:16.400 --> 0:08:19.040
<v Speaker 3>them playing some of the laggards in different industries, But

0:08:19.080 --> 0:08:22.440
<v Speaker 3>what about volatility gauges? What about looking at ways to

0:08:22.440 --> 0:08:24.600
<v Speaker 3>protect your downside? Is there a way of doing that

0:08:24.720 --> 0:08:27.640
<v Speaker 3>for some of these well, very lofty valuations.

0:08:28.320 --> 0:08:30.320
<v Speaker 5>And that's another way that our clients are playing this

0:08:30.480 --> 0:08:33.000
<v Speaker 5>with our options desk against stone cks. What they're doing

0:08:33.200 --> 0:08:37.400
<v Speaker 5>is they are buying vxx options, or they're buying puts

0:08:37.480 --> 0:08:40.720
<v Speaker 5>on the S and P five hundred index. These are

0:08:40.760 --> 0:08:42.920
<v Speaker 5>ways to protect in a cheap way. Of course, because

0:08:42.960 --> 0:08:45.520
<v Speaker 5>the market is so exuberant and complacent at the current levels,

0:08:46.040 --> 0:08:49.360
<v Speaker 5>making this kind of a countercyclical portfolio policy. And this

0:08:49.400 --> 0:08:51.520
<v Speaker 5>is something that I published in my piece last week.

0:08:51.720 --> 0:08:54.439
<v Speaker 5>It's important to think counter cyclically when the market is

0:08:54.480 --> 0:08:58.120
<v Speaker 5>so exuberant and so powerfully positive, to protect yourself, and

0:08:58.160 --> 0:09:00.679
<v Speaker 5>you can do so in a cheap way. You can

0:09:00.760 --> 0:09:03.480
<v Speaker 5>hold a nice portion in cash, buy some gold by

0:09:03.520 --> 0:09:07.160
<v Speaker 5>defensive sectors which are very cheap at current levels because

0:09:07.200 --> 0:09:09.600
<v Speaker 5>no one's really anticipating and I think that the recession

0:09:09.679 --> 0:09:13.960
<v Speaker 5>risk is massively underappreciated currently. So that's staples, that's utilities,

0:09:13.960 --> 0:09:18.199
<v Speaker 5>that's healthcare. These are sectors that are defensive and value

0:09:18.240 --> 0:09:21.080
<v Speaker 5>driven in nature, and that's also where clients are focused.

0:09:21.559 --> 0:09:25.160
<v Speaker 3>Great to get the perspective diversifications where it's at. Katin Manivera,

0:09:25.240 --> 0:09:28.920
<v Speaker 3>thank you so much, Chief market strategist at stoneA X Group. Meanwhile,

0:09:28.920 --> 0:09:31.360
<v Speaker 3>coming up, we've got more on the earning theme. Spotify

0:09:31.440 --> 0:09:33.600
<v Speaker 3>look at misses on estimates on revenue, but it does

0:09:33.640 --> 0:09:36.520
<v Speaker 3>give a strong monthly active US account. We're going to

0:09:36.559 --> 0:09:39.839
<v Speaker 3>dig into the details speaking of earnings as well. Actually,

0:09:39.920 --> 0:09:43.680
<v Speaker 3>Katra mentioned the name Verizon. We're watching shares up Percenter's

0:09:43.720 --> 0:09:46.720
<v Speaker 3>point largest US wildless carrier actually reported earnings that beat

0:09:46.880 --> 0:09:49.600
<v Speaker 3>estimates of profits for subscribers after a rid of a

0:09:49.600 --> 0:09:52.920
<v Speaker 3>surprising turnaround in that customer growth from New York. This

0:09:52.960 --> 0:10:05.320
<v Speaker 3>is Bloombg technology. Let's take a look at Spotify because

0:10:05.320 --> 0:10:08.079
<v Speaker 3>the reported earnings before the market open this morning. And look,

0:10:08.559 --> 0:10:10.160
<v Speaker 3>the shares are getting beaten up off the back of

0:10:10.200 --> 0:10:14.080
<v Speaker 3>it because second quarter revenue and third quarter revenue well forecast.

0:10:14.160 --> 0:10:17.600
<v Speaker 3>They missed expectations. So look the forecast for monthly active

0:10:17.679 --> 0:10:20.400
<v Speaker 3>users was better than expected. We're trying to gauge the

0:10:20.440 --> 0:10:24.079
<v Speaker 3>analyst reaction to this one city in particular, dean spotifyer

0:10:24.120 --> 0:10:26.760
<v Speaker 3>by saying that given their revenue miss quote, we would

0:10:26.800 --> 0:10:29.880
<v Speaker 3>not be surprised to see the shares trading lower. Shares

0:10:30.000 --> 0:10:33.120
<v Speaker 3>currently down as you see what fourteen percent almost on

0:10:33.160 --> 0:10:35.320
<v Speaker 3>this day of trade, Sunday sharmar and pleased to say

0:10:35.320 --> 0:10:37.120
<v Speaker 3>it's another analyst we can turn to with this moment.

0:10:37.200 --> 0:10:40.200
<v Speaker 3>Third Bridge joining for more and look, it's the worst

0:10:40.240 --> 0:10:42.920
<v Speaker 3>days is February twenty twenty two for this particular stock.

0:10:43.320 --> 0:10:45.800
<v Speaker 3>Were you as concerned by the forecast as the market

0:10:45.800 --> 0:10:46.160
<v Speaker 3>seems to.

0:10:46.160 --> 0:10:49.720
<v Speaker 6>Be again calin' going to have going to be on again.

0:10:49.920 --> 0:10:51.360
<v Speaker 6>A couple of things over you, I think when you're

0:10:51.360 --> 0:10:54.199
<v Speaker 6>thinking about this longer term, right, yes, the market is

0:10:54.240 --> 0:10:56.920
<v Speaker 6>clearly being a life spot of five because of certain misses,

0:10:56.960 --> 0:10:59.400
<v Speaker 6>and I think this is mostly around their issue with

0:10:59.600 --> 0:11:02.800
<v Speaker 6>slightly missing their gross profit margin targets. But if you

0:11:02.800 --> 0:11:05.360
<v Speaker 6>look at the bigger picture over here, right THEMAU as

0:11:05.400 --> 0:11:07.560
<v Speaker 6>well as a premium subscriber editions that they were able

0:11:07.600 --> 0:11:10.240
<v Speaker 6>to achieve in this last quarter really shows that their

0:11:10.280 --> 0:11:14.200
<v Speaker 6>overarching strategy of gaining more subscribers in developed markets and

0:11:14.280 --> 0:11:17.640
<v Speaker 6>developing markets is beginning to play our play out. I

0:11:17.640 --> 0:11:19.440
<v Speaker 6>think the big thing over here to bear in mind

0:11:19.480 --> 0:11:23.680
<v Speaker 6>for retail and institutional investors is Spotify is executing on

0:11:24.000 --> 0:11:26.600
<v Speaker 6>rationalizing its cast space. It's really trying to be a

0:11:26.679 --> 0:11:29.760
<v Speaker 6>leaner machine across the entire board. But such things do

0:11:29.840 --> 0:11:32.160
<v Speaker 6>take some time to materialize in terms of earning. So

0:11:32.760 --> 0:11:37.480
<v Speaker 6>while we are seeing a yd really substantial shareprise rally

0:11:37.600 --> 0:11:39.560
<v Speaker 6>versus the slash that we saw in twenty twenty one

0:11:39.559 --> 0:11:43.479
<v Speaker 6>to twenty twenty two, I think, based on our observations

0:11:43.480 --> 0:11:47.120
<v Speaker 6>and the expressive interviewed at Third Bridge, the penalization right

0:11:47.160 --> 0:11:49.800
<v Speaker 6>now might be more of a short term reaction as

0:11:49.840 --> 0:11:52.720
<v Speaker 6>everybody's getting used as this information and sort of getting

0:11:52.720 --> 0:11:55.040
<v Speaker 6>prepared for what QT and Q four holds for them.

0:11:55.120 --> 0:11:58.520
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so push ahead the premium price height that we

0:11:58.640 --> 0:12:01.839
<v Speaker 3>found finally catching up with other offerings out there from

0:12:01.880 --> 0:12:04.400
<v Speaker 3>Amazon and the like. Do you think that will in

0:12:04.440 --> 0:12:07.600
<v Speaker 3>any way crimp back on that user uptick?

0:12:07.679 --> 0:12:10.640
<v Speaker 6>We've seen such a great question, right, So that's something

0:12:10.640 --> 0:12:12.720
<v Speaker 6>that everybody is waiting to see how it's going to

0:12:12.720 --> 0:12:15.520
<v Speaker 6>play out based on the observations and the analysis we

0:12:15.640 --> 0:12:16.160
<v Speaker 6>have done.

0:12:16.640 --> 0:12:17.840
<v Speaker 2>Music as well as music.

0:12:17.760 --> 0:12:20.839
<v Speaker 6>Streaming is quite a commodity and people tend to not

0:12:21.000 --> 0:12:23.160
<v Speaker 6>hurn as much as they would expect. If you think

0:12:23.160 --> 0:12:26.120
<v Speaker 6>about Spotify's timing with this as well, they're doing it

0:12:26.160 --> 0:12:28.920
<v Speaker 6>after majority of other players have already taken this move,

0:12:28.960 --> 0:12:30.760
<v Speaker 6>so it's kind of defensive on their path to do

0:12:30.880 --> 0:12:33.839
<v Speaker 6>this and also imperative of them to do it as well. Again,

0:12:34.000 --> 0:12:36.160
<v Speaker 6>difficult to say currently at the stage whether it's going

0:12:36.160 --> 0:12:38.280
<v Speaker 6>to lead it to a huge amount of churn, of

0:12:38.320 --> 0:12:39.520
<v Speaker 6>substantial slow down.

0:12:39.400 --> 0:12:40.680
<v Speaker 2>An uptic of new consumers.

0:12:41.040 --> 0:12:43.840
<v Speaker 6>But if the price that they're playing right now versus

0:12:43.840 --> 0:12:46.560
<v Speaker 6>other players, it's more or less in line or slightly competitive,

0:12:47.120 --> 0:12:51.680
<v Speaker 6>it shouldn't be as negative and impact as everybody's anticipating. Also,

0:12:51.840 --> 0:12:54.040
<v Speaker 6>fair enough, Spotify has indicated it's going to be doing

0:12:54.120 --> 0:12:57.520
<v Speaker 6>this for a while, so it shouldn't necessarily be such

0:12:57.520 --> 0:12:59.880
<v Speaker 6>a shock to the markets across the board because they

0:13:00.120 --> 0:13:01.800
<v Speaker 6>pushing for this for a long time as well.

0:13:02.120 --> 0:13:04.480
<v Speaker 3>This is a stock, as you say, that's rallied hard

0:13:04.520 --> 0:13:07.880
<v Speaker 3>on the year up now seventy seven percent. I'm interested

0:13:07.920 --> 0:13:11.600
<v Speaker 3>to standing on whether it's been the AI exuberance that

0:13:11.640 --> 0:13:13.520
<v Speaker 3>has been caught up. And we know that they have

0:13:13.559 --> 0:13:17.200
<v Speaker 3>an AIDJ for example, but how much can artificial intelligence

0:13:17.240 --> 0:13:18.600
<v Speaker 3>add to the bottom line in any way?

0:13:19.480 --> 0:13:21.360
<v Speaker 6>So you know, great thing over here. A couple of

0:13:21.360 --> 0:13:23.280
<v Speaker 6>things when it comes to AI right. First off, the

0:13:23.280 --> 0:13:25.160
<v Speaker 6>share price value, if you really think about it, it

0:13:25.240 --> 0:13:28.200
<v Speaker 6>has been driven because of the huge layoffs that they

0:13:28.200 --> 0:13:29.959
<v Speaker 6>had they got out of down our staff as well.

0:13:29.960 --> 0:13:32.400
<v Speaker 6>They've really been trying to clean out their operations and

0:13:32.400 --> 0:13:35.160
<v Speaker 6>build out that oppec space, which is what investors have

0:13:35.200 --> 0:13:37.280
<v Speaker 6>been asking for over that time. I don't think that

0:13:37.360 --> 0:13:39.800
<v Speaker 6>this is that much of an AI play in terms

0:13:39.840 --> 0:13:42.480
<v Speaker 6>of what's driving the share price valuy. I think around

0:13:42.559 --> 0:13:45.400
<v Speaker 6>artificial intelligence a big thing that everybody wants to understand

0:13:45.440 --> 0:13:47.960
<v Speaker 6>right now, Yes, it's a buzzword, but Spotify has been

0:13:48.000 --> 0:13:50.720
<v Speaker 6>implementing AI and mL for a substantial period of time,

0:13:51.000 --> 0:13:52.960
<v Speaker 6>even when they recommend their music to us, right so,

0:13:53.000 --> 0:13:56.320
<v Speaker 6>they have already dipped us into this water. There is

0:13:56.360 --> 0:13:59.800
<v Speaker 6>some contentious issues coming out right now between the music

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:03.319
<v Speaker 6>the record labels as well as the digital streaming platforms,

0:14:03.320 --> 0:14:05.559
<v Speaker 6>but they've always had a contextuous relationship.

0:14:05.800 --> 0:14:08.679
<v Speaker 2>When we're thinking about AI and mL.

0:14:08.120 --> 0:14:09.760
<v Speaker 6>A big thing over here is just going to be

0:14:10.440 --> 0:14:12.800
<v Speaker 6>how much more technology do they need to acquire, how

0:14:12.880 --> 0:14:14.880
<v Speaker 6>much more money do they need to spend on this?

0:14:15.240 --> 0:14:18.560
<v Speaker 6>And then how does that story play into their cash constraints,

0:14:18.600 --> 0:14:21.360
<v Speaker 6>on into their profitability constraints. That, of course, is something

0:14:21.400 --> 0:14:24.200
<v Speaker 6>that hasn't been directly addressed so quickly, And perhaps the

0:14:24.240 --> 0:14:27.240
<v Speaker 6>next quarter or two will tell us about how Spotify.

0:14:26.960 --> 0:14:28.680
<v Speaker 2>Is going to think about investments in this.

0:14:29.200 --> 0:14:31.480
<v Speaker 6>So only then will we get to know exactly how

0:14:31.520 --> 0:14:33.320
<v Speaker 6>the market's going to react to those costs or the

0:14:33.360 --> 0:14:34.280
<v Speaker 6>investment costs for that.

0:14:34.480 --> 0:14:36.920
<v Speaker 3>I mean, meanwhile, go back to the cost cutting. We

0:14:36.960 --> 0:14:39.440
<v Speaker 3>are anticipating further job cuts, I think they said in

0:14:39.480 --> 0:14:42.600
<v Speaker 3>the next quarter of the CFO and don Astrov you mentioned,

0:14:42.720 --> 0:14:45.960
<v Speaker 3>I mean a big talent loss from a podcasting perspective,

0:14:46.520 --> 0:14:49.520
<v Speaker 3>But is this the right direction to be trimming costs

0:14:49.560 --> 0:14:51.120
<v Speaker 3>when it comes to talent and people?

0:14:52.480 --> 0:14:54.960
<v Speaker 6>So I think the big thing with don Astrov as well, right,

0:14:55.000 --> 0:14:57.640
<v Speaker 6>so quite creative in terms of the content that was

0:14:57.680 --> 0:15:01.880
<v Speaker 6>being created podcasting, especially back into twenty twenty two, was

0:15:01.920 --> 0:15:04.320
<v Speaker 6>the buzz where that Spotify was going for at that time.

0:15:04.600 --> 0:15:07.160
<v Speaker 6>But it's been pretty evident so far that monetization and

0:15:07.200 --> 0:15:10.720
<v Speaker 6>podcasting is pretty hard. Despite an increase in consumption across

0:15:10.720 --> 0:15:13.680
<v Speaker 6>the board, the technology that they had, or the entire

0:15:13.720 --> 0:15:17.920
<v Speaker 6>situation of how music streaming or podcast advertising works, it

0:15:18.000 --> 0:15:20.480
<v Speaker 6>doesn't really lend itself at the current moment to create

0:15:20.520 --> 0:15:23.360
<v Speaker 6>monetization opportunities. What they're going to be doing over here

0:15:23.440 --> 0:15:25.280
<v Speaker 6>is going to be getting smarter in terms of the

0:15:25.320 --> 0:15:27.200
<v Speaker 6>content that they have. They're going to be trying to

0:15:27.200 --> 0:15:30.040
<v Speaker 6>monetize that a lot better. And if that requires them

0:15:30.040 --> 0:15:33.640
<v Speaker 6>to take a certain amount of hits or have a

0:15:33.680 --> 0:15:36.200
<v Speaker 6>certain degree of losses to curtail and get a bit leaner,

0:15:36.680 --> 0:15:39.480
<v Speaker 6>they're still providing that story of profitability which the market

0:15:39.480 --> 0:15:42.080
<v Speaker 6>cares about. Again, right, they've shifted or the market is

0:15:42.080 --> 0:15:45.320
<v Speaker 6>shifted from that story of podcasting growth towards a story

0:15:45.360 --> 0:15:48.040
<v Speaker 6>of a bit more of a conservative company with better margins.

0:15:48.600 --> 0:15:51.080
<v Speaker 3>Sundy. Great to catch up with you. Thank you, Sandy

0:15:51.200 --> 0:15:54.200
<v Speaker 3>Shehama working at five pm over there in Europe. Third

0:15:54.200 --> 0:16:04.240
<v Speaker 3>Bridge Analyst time now for Talking Tech. First up show

0:16:04.360 --> 0:16:07.320
<v Speaker 3>Me plans to focus on five G smartphones and Alena

0:16:07.360 --> 0:16:10.880
<v Speaker 3>product portfolio in India. Now that what's dominating, Chinese manufacturer

0:16:10.960 --> 0:16:13.240
<v Speaker 3>is trying to call back market share lost the rivals,

0:16:13.240 --> 0:16:16.200
<v Speaker 3>including South KOREIZ Samsung. In India, it's, of course, its

0:16:16.200 --> 0:16:20.440
<v Speaker 3>second biggest market. Meanwhile, Adobe's twenty billion dollar takeover of

0:16:20.480 --> 0:16:23.560
<v Speaker 3>design startup Figma is on calls for an investigation from

0:16:23.560 --> 0:16:27.880
<v Speaker 3>EU merger regulators. Purchase is also facing global scrutiny as

0:16:27.880 --> 0:16:31.480
<v Speaker 3>the US Justice Department prepares an antitrust lawsuit seeking to

0:16:31.480 --> 0:16:35.320
<v Speaker 3>block the merger, and Sequoia while it's kind a third

0:16:35.400 --> 0:16:38.160
<v Speaker 3>of its talent division, a sign of continued restructuring in

0:16:38.200 --> 0:16:40.640
<v Speaker 3>the world of Silicon Valley startups and VC now. The

0:16:40.640 --> 0:16:42.760
<v Speaker 3>move comes as the firm parts ways with at least

0:16:42.800 --> 0:16:46.400
<v Speaker 3>five investing partners, two of which the champion Sequi's doomed

0:16:46.480 --> 0:16:50.560
<v Speaker 3>backing of Crypto exchange FTX. Let's go back to the

0:16:50.680 --> 0:16:52.920
<v Speaker 3>M and A theme though, if we're just talking Adobe

0:16:52.920 --> 0:16:57.120
<v Speaker 3>and Figma, what then of Amazon's deal for its acquisition

0:16:57.240 --> 0:17:00.280
<v Speaker 3>of I Robot. Now I robot is actually now going

0:17:00.320 --> 0:17:02.280
<v Speaker 3>to come at a lower price point for Amazon, it

0:17:02.320 --> 0:17:04.520
<v Speaker 3>would seem for the rumor maker. It's now going to

0:17:04.560 --> 0:17:07.040
<v Speaker 3>be fifty one dollars seventy five per share, down from

0:17:07.200 --> 0:17:09.959
<v Speaker 3>sixty one per share when it was originally agreed. Change.

0:17:10.080 --> 0:17:13.560
<v Speaker 3>We understand off sets some rather expensing debt that I

0:17:13.720 --> 0:17:17.720
<v Speaker 3>robot is taking on. Let's go to Spencer Solaper, who

0:17:17.760 --> 0:17:19.840
<v Speaker 3>is oman on the ground when it comes to Amazon

0:17:20.359 --> 0:17:25.200
<v Speaker 3>and Spencer, I'm interested in this pretty hefty price car.

0:17:25.840 --> 0:17:28.200
<v Speaker 3>I mean, were you anticipating it because it is a

0:17:28.320 --> 0:17:30.320
<v Speaker 3>pretty expensive debt deal that they've struck.

0:17:31.520 --> 0:17:35.200
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, and it actually it seems like the regulatory scrutiny

0:17:35.240 --> 0:17:38.960
<v Speaker 7>is slowing the steal down is actually benefiting Amazon because

0:17:39.280 --> 0:17:41.960
<v Speaker 7>you know, this is I Robot's an example of another

0:17:41.960 --> 0:17:45.120
<v Speaker 7>one of these kind of pandemic darlings that people were

0:17:45.160 --> 0:17:47.399
<v Speaker 7>just snatching them up right and left when everyone was

0:17:47.440 --> 0:17:49.120
<v Speaker 7>locked at home and trying to keep their holms nice.

0:17:49.160 --> 0:17:54.919
<v Speaker 7>And now they're struggling from people returning to normal habits,

0:17:54.920 --> 0:17:57.800
<v Speaker 7>which I guess includes keeping a messy house or cleaning

0:17:57.800 --> 0:18:01.920
<v Speaker 7>the house yourself. And so yeah, so they're able to

0:18:02.720 --> 0:18:04.440
<v Speaker 7>cut their price in response to this debt that I

0:18:04.560 --> 0:18:07.200
<v Speaker 7>Robot had to take on because the market is softer.

0:18:07.960 --> 0:18:10.879
<v Speaker 3>We've been naming ours various things back at home. But

0:18:11.359 --> 0:18:15.399
<v Speaker 3>I'm interested, Like for Amazon, there's another key price point

0:18:15.600 --> 0:18:17.840
<v Speaker 3>for them and cost base, which is of course as people,

0:18:17.880 --> 0:18:19.920
<v Speaker 3>and we know that Amazon have been trimming on that people.

0:18:19.960 --> 0:18:22.840
<v Speaker 3>There's an interesting news point today that well, the deal

0:18:23.200 --> 0:18:28.200
<v Speaker 3>between UPS and teamsters, so their own delivery force seems

0:18:28.200 --> 0:18:30.240
<v Speaker 3>to have been struck. Now what does that mean for Amazon,

0:18:30.280 --> 0:18:31.920
<v Speaker 3>because of course we know that they have tension with

0:18:32.000 --> 0:18:33.040
<v Speaker 3>labor unions.

0:18:33.880 --> 0:18:36.800
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, that it is interesting. So in your term, Amazon

0:18:36.840 --> 0:18:39.880
<v Speaker 7>wasn't sweating a UPS strike too much, even though Amazon

0:18:39.960 --> 0:18:43.280
<v Speaker 7>is UPS's largest customer. I think one in ten UPS

0:18:43.280 --> 0:18:47.160
<v Speaker 7>packages actually come from from Amazon in the US. But

0:18:47.200 --> 0:18:49.040
<v Speaker 7>still Amazon wasn't sweating it too much because they have

0:18:49.080 --> 0:18:51.639
<v Speaker 7>their own delivery network. They have, you know, their branded

0:18:51.720 --> 0:18:53.840
<v Speaker 7>vans out there run by small businesses, and they also

0:18:53.880 --> 0:18:57.560
<v Speaker 7>have like this flex army of drivers like kind of

0:18:57.560 --> 0:19:00.280
<v Speaker 7>like Uber that you can deliver Amazon packages in your

0:19:00.280 --> 0:19:02.840
<v Speaker 7>own van, so they've definitely diversified that, and also at

0:19:02.840 --> 0:19:04.639
<v Speaker 7>summertime so things aren't slow if there was like a

0:19:04.640 --> 0:19:07.639
<v Speaker 7>summertime strike, that's actually a good time for Amazon to

0:19:07.680 --> 0:19:09.800
<v Speaker 7>see a to see a labor strike for its delivery

0:19:09.800 --> 0:19:11.520
<v Speaker 7>people because there's just not as much demand to say

0:19:11.520 --> 0:19:16.119
<v Speaker 7>the holidays. But longer term, this is an interesting development

0:19:16.160 --> 0:19:18.359
<v Speaker 7>because the teamsters have said, we're going to focus on

0:19:19.040 --> 0:19:21.359
<v Speaker 7>UPS and get our contract and then we're coming for

0:19:21.400 --> 0:19:24.960
<v Speaker 7>you Amazon, because Amazon does have thousands of these delivery

0:19:25.000 --> 0:19:28.920
<v Speaker 7>service partners that employ hundreds of thousands of drivers, and

0:19:28.960 --> 0:19:32.119
<v Speaker 7>the teamsters don't like how little those drivers are getting

0:19:32.160 --> 0:19:34.719
<v Speaker 7>paid and the conditions that they're working in. And so

0:19:34.760 --> 0:19:36.399
<v Speaker 7>now they're going to take this contract that they have

0:19:36.480 --> 0:19:38.760
<v Speaker 7>with UPS and try to dangle it in front of

0:19:38.760 --> 0:19:42.520
<v Speaker 7>those drivers who are delivering packages for Amazon and say, hey,

0:19:42.280 --> 0:19:44.640
<v Speaker 7>you guys deserve a lot better, why don't you come

0:19:44.640 --> 0:19:46.680
<v Speaker 7>on board with us? So I think we're going to

0:19:46.720 --> 0:19:50.120
<v Speaker 7>see more of a fight between the teamsters and Amazon

0:19:50.480 --> 0:19:52.440
<v Speaker 7>now that the UPS situation has resolved.

0:19:52.560 --> 0:19:54.880
<v Speaker 3>Interesting UPS getting a bit of a boost on well

0:19:54.920 --> 0:19:57.080
<v Speaker 3>some clarity at least from that deal, But it's a

0:19:57.160 --> 0:19:59.760
<v Speaker 3>so for a great way across to Amazon. Thanks so much.

0:20:07.480 --> 0:20:09.879
<v Speaker 3>Welcome back to Bloomberg Technology. I'm Karen Hide in New York.

0:20:09.960 --> 0:20:12.399
<v Speaker 3>Let's get you up to speed where these markets are trading,

0:20:12.440 --> 0:20:15.200
<v Speaker 3>because we know that about forty percent of the entire

0:20:15.280 --> 0:20:17.440
<v Speaker 3>market cap of the likes of the S ANDP are

0:20:17.440 --> 0:20:20.480
<v Speaker 3>coming for earnings this week. Tech managing to push on

0:20:20.560 --> 0:20:23.760
<v Speaker 3>higher the key market capitalizations and Microsoft of Alphabet, they're

0:20:23.760 --> 0:20:26.280
<v Speaker 3>both giving us numbers after the bell. People optimistic that

0:20:26.320 --> 0:20:28.719
<v Speaker 3>perhaps they can vindicate in some way the massive run

0:20:28.800 --> 0:20:31.840
<v Speaker 3>up we've seen in market capitalization and valuations at the

0:20:32.040 --> 0:20:33.760
<v Speaker 3>first half of the year. We're looking at the Golden

0:20:33.840 --> 0:20:36.400
<v Speaker 3>Dragon index. That's of course the NAZAG Golden Dragon over

0:20:36.400 --> 0:20:38.159
<v Speaker 3>there in China, those names that are traded here in

0:20:38.160 --> 0:20:40.399
<v Speaker 3>the US. On the upside, that comes more on a

0:20:40.440 --> 0:20:42.320
<v Speaker 3>macro picture and the fact that China is looking to

0:20:42.320 --> 0:20:45.320
<v Speaker 3>once again support its own economy, giving wind actually to

0:20:45.400 --> 0:20:46.840
<v Speaker 3>a lot of some of the mining names out there.

0:20:46.880 --> 0:20:49.480
<v Speaker 3>That's why Europe managed to trade higher in today's trade

0:20:49.480 --> 0:20:51.320
<v Speaker 3>as well. I'm looking at a two year yield on

0:20:51.359 --> 0:20:54.040
<v Speaker 3>the downside, interesting some steepening of that yield curve today,

0:20:54.040 --> 0:20:56.439
<v Speaker 3>the tenure selling off bonds rising in terms of a

0:20:56.600 --> 0:20:59.560
<v Speaker 3>boring cost there and atu overall price falling. That's on

0:20:59.600 --> 0:21:02.200
<v Speaker 3>the back of consumer confidence when good news is bad

0:21:02.240 --> 0:21:05.000
<v Speaker 3>news consuming a confidence really strong at the moment. What

0:21:05.040 --> 0:21:06.800
<v Speaker 3>does the FED therefore do in terms of trying to

0:21:06.800 --> 0:21:09.800
<v Speaker 3>suppress inflation when the economy still looks pretty good. Let's

0:21:09.840 --> 0:21:11.520
<v Speaker 3>have a look at what's happening in terms of individual

0:21:11.560 --> 0:21:14.280
<v Speaker 3>names for you, though, because an XP semi conductor actually

0:21:14.400 --> 0:21:17.240
<v Speaker 3>numbers doing better than expected, we're particularly seeing growth in

0:21:17.240 --> 0:21:19.520
<v Speaker 3>the automotive sector. For this chip maker, we're up four percent.

0:21:19.560 --> 0:21:21.320
<v Speaker 3>What does that read across mean for the rest of

0:21:21.320 --> 0:21:23.200
<v Speaker 3>the chip makers today and the rest of the week.

0:21:23.240 --> 0:21:26.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm looking at Raitheon Technologies because yes, it makes engines.

0:21:26.359 --> 0:21:28.440
<v Speaker 3>That is deeply a tech story, and we're seeing it

0:21:28.440 --> 0:21:30.520
<v Speaker 3>on the downside because some of the paint, the powder

0:21:30.560 --> 0:21:33.160
<v Speaker 3>paint used in some key engines is actually causing issues.

0:21:33.160 --> 0:21:35.200
<v Speaker 3>They're going to have to investigate and do more assessments

0:21:35.200 --> 0:21:36.520
<v Speaker 3>that it's going to cost them, so they're done by

0:21:36.520 --> 0:21:39.359
<v Speaker 3>some thirteen percent. We're looking at Microsoft, though, up a

0:21:39.400 --> 0:21:41.760
<v Speaker 3>percentage point ahead of their all important numbers, and we

0:21:41.920 --> 0:21:43.479
<v Speaker 3>know so much of that's going to be about it's

0:21:43.520 --> 0:21:46.600
<v Speaker 3>cloud or as it's generative AI, and also what's happening

0:21:46.640 --> 0:21:48.880
<v Speaker 3>with the gaming, the focus on activision. We can weave

0:21:48.920 --> 0:21:50.960
<v Speaker 3>all of that together now because generative AI, we know,

0:21:51.080 --> 0:21:54.200
<v Speaker 3>is opening up a potential to lower gain production costs,

0:21:54.240 --> 0:21:56.840
<v Speaker 3>with one analyst telling Bloomberg that the money, the time

0:21:56.920 --> 0:21:59.359
<v Speaker 3>that people needed to complete one big gain can we

0:21:59.400 --> 0:22:02.359
<v Speaker 3>come hard. Part of that cost saving could come down

0:22:02.400 --> 0:22:06.560
<v Speaker 3>to tools like well cub Co, an anime character generator

0:22:06.640 --> 0:22:08.560
<v Speaker 3>by preferred networks. Just take a listen.

0:22:10.520 --> 0:22:13.919
<v Speaker 7>First, we will generate some rundown characters to begin with.

0:22:14.560 --> 0:22:19.320
<v Speaker 8>Click on the generated generate. Ah, yeah, not safe for work.

0:22:23.960 --> 0:22:27.200
<v Speaker 9>As with many industries across the board, AI is disrupting

0:22:27.240 --> 0:22:30.440
<v Speaker 9>the business of making video games. We're headed to preferred

0:22:30.480 --> 0:22:34.280
<v Speaker 9>networks in Tokyo to create our very own anime character

0:22:34.640 --> 0:22:39.040
<v Speaker 9>in less than five minutes. Generative AI is opening up

0:22:39.040 --> 0:22:42.400
<v Speaker 9>the potential to lower game production costs, with one analyst

0:22:42.480 --> 0:22:45.600
<v Speaker 9>telling Bloomberg that the money, time, and people needed to

0:22:45.640 --> 0:22:47.520
<v Speaker 9>complete one big game can be.

0:22:47.520 --> 0:22:48.399
<v Speaker 8>Cut in half.

0:22:48.800 --> 0:22:51.160
<v Speaker 9>Part of that cost saving could come down to tools

0:22:51.320 --> 0:23:08.440
<v Speaker 9>like Crypto, an anime character generator by preferred networks.

0:23:09.080 --> 0:23:13.439
<v Speaker 8>Okay, so this girl, I like her. She seems real happy.

0:23:13.840 --> 0:23:15.640
<v Speaker 4>And then you can click the fuse.

0:23:15.880 --> 0:23:20.080
<v Speaker 9>And emerge something together and it will give you a

0:23:20.160 --> 0:23:24.520
<v Speaker 9>variety of new characters based on the cater you had

0:23:24.600 --> 0:23:29.040
<v Speaker 9>to You can also fine tune the character's features, like

0:23:29.080 --> 0:23:31.400
<v Speaker 9>giving it twenty years and different expressions.

0:23:32.040 --> 0:23:35.760
<v Speaker 8>I want minds have glasses and I'm naming her Kinko.

0:23:38.600 --> 0:23:41.080
<v Speaker 8>After you create the character, you can chat with the character.

0:23:41.640 --> 0:23:45.120
<v Speaker 8>Love your hair today.

0:23:46.520 --> 0:23:50.320
<v Speaker 9>Still, critics argue Generative AI is trained on art without

0:23:50.359 --> 0:23:54.120
<v Speaker 9>consent from the original creators, who says they began debating

0:23:54.160 --> 0:23:59.200
<v Speaker 9>copyright concerns three years ago.

0:24:00.040 --> 0:24:11.199
<v Speaker 3>Opinion, how you go. Sorry, we didn't have the the

0:24:11.359 --> 0:24:13.720
<v Speaker 3>translation for that at the very end, but we thank

0:24:14.000 --> 0:24:18.199
<v Speaker 3>Kareemimuri in Tokyo for that piece. Meanwhile, sticking with gaming,

0:24:18.520 --> 0:24:21.640
<v Speaker 3>super League Gaming is a leading launch pad for brands

0:24:21.680 --> 0:24:25.239
<v Speaker 3>and creators and pretty dynamic gaming metaverse. In fact, here

0:24:25.280 --> 0:24:28.560
<v Speaker 3>to talk more about the metaverse advertising bum or bust,

0:24:29.000 --> 0:24:31.879
<v Speaker 3>Super League Gaming CEO and hand. It is great to

0:24:31.880 --> 0:24:34.160
<v Speaker 3>have some time with you, Anne, And look, we look

0:24:34.200 --> 0:24:37.800
<v Speaker 3>ahead to meta the actual company that's rebranded itself a

0:24:37.880 --> 0:24:41.200
<v Speaker 3>couple of years ago, its earnings. We're looking towards whether

0:24:41.240 --> 0:24:44.119
<v Speaker 3>advertising is still there, whether people are particularly in the

0:24:44.160 --> 0:24:46.840
<v Speaker 3>gaming sector are seeing a new avenue you are, you're

0:24:46.840 --> 0:24:48.960
<v Speaker 3>still seeing a commitment from brands to want to reach

0:24:49.000 --> 0:24:51.320
<v Speaker 3>a new audience through gaming and the metaverse.

0:24:52.520 --> 0:24:52.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:24:52.880 --> 0:24:53.520
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely.

0:24:53.600 --> 0:24:57.240
<v Speaker 1>I think the reality is is the definition of gaming

0:24:57.320 --> 0:25:00.720
<v Speaker 1>has changed a great deal. You know, when in the

0:25:00.760 --> 0:25:02.800
<v Speaker 1>early days, when you were trying to advertise in a game,

0:25:02.840 --> 0:25:05.760
<v Speaker 1>you were interrupting the game experience. And then really with

0:25:05.800 --> 0:25:08.640
<v Speaker 1>the explosion of these open world gaming platforms that are

0:25:08.720 --> 0:25:13.280
<v Speaker 1>like open canvases, games like platforms like Rodbox and Minecraft

0:25:13.320 --> 0:25:18.000
<v Speaker 1>and increasingly Fortnite, it really allows brands to be brought

0:25:18.080 --> 0:25:21.439
<v Speaker 1>natively into the landscape of the game, and so it

0:25:21.640 --> 0:25:24.080
<v Speaker 1>changes that experience in the way brands kind of like

0:25:24.119 --> 0:25:28.679
<v Speaker 1>product placement on steroids, can deeply interact with harder to

0:25:28.760 --> 0:25:32.320
<v Speaker 1>reach audiences. So I think the definition of in game

0:25:32.400 --> 0:25:35.119
<v Speaker 1>advertising and what that means and looks like and why

0:25:35.680 --> 0:25:38.719
<v Speaker 1>users want it and appreciate it and engage with it

0:25:38.760 --> 0:25:40.600
<v Speaker 1>more has changed a great deal.

0:25:41.560 --> 0:25:46.040
<v Speaker 3>Can you give us any facts, numbers, data that can

0:25:46.160 --> 0:25:50.000
<v Speaker 3>just put the confidence back into people that brands also

0:25:50.040 --> 0:25:51.760
<v Speaker 3>wanting to commit real money to this.

0:25:52.760 --> 0:25:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I mean, look, there's no doubt that while you've

0:25:55.040 --> 0:25:58.800
<v Speaker 1>got you know, meta's great news with three billion aggregated users.

0:25:58.840 --> 0:26:04.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, still your that digital ad dollars are down, right,

0:26:04.320 --> 0:26:08.560
<v Speaker 1>ad spends down, But that's really about traditional digital advertising

0:26:08.600 --> 0:26:11.560
<v Speaker 1>because that's been underperforming now for the last couple of years,

0:26:12.080 --> 0:26:15.360
<v Speaker 1>and so when brands are trying to seek much deeper

0:26:15.359 --> 0:26:18.880
<v Speaker 1>engagement that top of the funnel, including that conversion over

0:26:18.960 --> 0:26:23.920
<v Speaker 1>into physical sales. Interacting in these open world gaming platforms

0:26:24.560 --> 0:26:26.480
<v Speaker 1>again is a way to reach a hard to reach

0:26:26.560 --> 0:26:30.159
<v Speaker 1>audience and actually achieve those marketing outcomes that right now

0:26:30.320 --> 0:26:32.280
<v Speaker 1>traditional social media is and delivering on.

0:26:32.720 --> 0:26:34.640
<v Speaker 3>I think what is it, fifty six billion by twenty

0:26:34.720 --> 0:26:37.800
<v Speaker 3>twenty four is where you see in game advertising and

0:26:37.800 --> 0:26:42.040
<v Speaker 3>projected growth to go. How much does that convert into

0:26:42.080 --> 0:26:43.960
<v Speaker 3>real sales? What sort of data did you see as

0:26:43.960 --> 0:26:46.200
<v Speaker 3>to when I'm interacting with it on Twitch and I'm

0:26:46.240 --> 0:26:48.200
<v Speaker 3>seeing a particular brand that I actually go out and

0:26:48.240 --> 0:26:48.920
<v Speaker 3>purchase something.

0:26:49.720 --> 0:26:50.000
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

0:26:50.040 --> 0:26:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Again, you know when you think about seeing an ad

0:26:52.320 --> 0:26:55.560
<v Speaker 1>on YouTube or in Twitch and clicking over on that conversion,

0:26:55.600 --> 0:26:57.919
<v Speaker 1>there's lots of studies there showing that our eyeballs are

0:26:57.920 --> 0:27:01.280
<v Speaker 1>glazing over those ass We can't head X fast enough, right,

0:27:01.320 --> 0:27:04.480
<v Speaker 1>we're tuning them out. The difference for what we do.

0:27:04.560 --> 0:27:06.800
<v Speaker 1>A good example is what we did for Mattel with

0:27:06.880 --> 0:27:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Barbie late last year is we actually baked a Barbie

0:27:11.080 --> 0:27:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Dreamhouse virtual world inside an existing game world that already

0:27:14.760 --> 0:27:18.520
<v Speaker 1>had tons of players, and during that course of that month,

0:27:18.520 --> 0:27:21.560
<v Speaker 1>we were able to have sixty million visits to Barbie's Dreamhouse.

0:27:21.640 --> 0:27:24.399
<v Speaker 1>You could swim in the pool, you could dejayn the

0:27:24.480 --> 0:27:27.680
<v Speaker 1>roof deck. Again, this is about kind of deep engagement

0:27:27.720 --> 0:27:31.600
<v Speaker 1>that enhances the gameplay. Another great example is two promotions

0:27:31.680 --> 0:27:34.080
<v Speaker 1>we ran for Chipotle where you could in one case,

0:27:34.119 --> 0:27:37.879
<v Speaker 1>go through a Halloween maze and find a secret phrase

0:27:37.920 --> 0:27:39.879
<v Speaker 1>for a burrito. The second one was a build a

0:27:39.880 --> 0:27:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Burrito campaign. During the course of those two campaigns, we

0:27:44.240 --> 0:27:47.040
<v Speaker 1>gave away one hundred and thirty thousand real life burritos,

0:27:47.080 --> 0:27:50.680
<v Speaker 1>but also set records for highest digital app download day

0:27:50.920 --> 0:27:53.600
<v Speaker 1>and one of the highest digital food sales days for Chipotle.

0:27:53.760 --> 0:27:57.320
<v Speaker 1>So that digital of physical crossover is a really powerful

0:27:57.359 --> 0:28:02.080
<v Speaker 1>thing that's much more sticky in a virtual world experience

0:28:02.119 --> 0:28:04.280
<v Speaker 1>that again is interactive for the user.

0:28:04.640 --> 0:28:06.320
<v Speaker 3>Does it have to be massive brands?

0:28:08.200 --> 0:28:10.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's a great question. Actually, we do a

0:28:10.800 --> 0:28:13.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of work with like Universal, and you'd expect with

0:28:13.080 --> 0:28:16.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the studios you know, Netflix, Disney, Paramountain

0:28:16.640 --> 0:28:19.920
<v Speaker 1>is one of our investors. And what Universal did last

0:28:19.960 --> 0:28:23.320
<v Speaker 1>year is they tested new IP. So yes, we do

0:28:23.400 --> 0:28:26.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot with minions and some of their more known IP,

0:28:26.200 --> 0:28:30.160
<v Speaker 1>but equally they dropped some animated characters that kids had

0:28:30.160 --> 0:28:33.440
<v Speaker 1>never seen before and we were able to test for them.

0:28:33.560 --> 0:28:36.560
<v Speaker 1>You know how much kids responded to the different characters

0:28:36.600 --> 0:28:39.600
<v Speaker 1>ahead of the debut in the movie theaters. And I've

0:28:39.600 --> 0:28:42.120
<v Speaker 1>often said to some of the larger toy makers in

0:28:42.160 --> 0:28:45.800
<v Speaker 1>the world and others, like, let's find your next billion

0:28:45.880 --> 0:28:50.560
<v Speaker 1>dollar toy line in the metaverse. First, let's sample different IP. Frankly,

0:28:50.640 --> 0:28:54.520
<v Speaker 1>let's engage those young audiences in helping us actually craft

0:28:55.000 --> 0:28:58.000
<v Speaker 1>that great new toy line and really start to reverse

0:28:58.040 --> 0:29:01.040
<v Speaker 1>that flow from digital to physical. But also just think

0:29:01.080 --> 0:29:05.120
<v Speaker 1>about the smarter cogs supply chain savings by just doing

0:29:05.160 --> 0:29:07.080
<v Speaker 1>your R and D turning it on its head.

0:29:07.720 --> 0:29:10.640
<v Speaker 3>It is interesting that, of course, in this economic environment,

0:29:10.840 --> 0:29:13.640
<v Speaker 3>all companies are focused on the bottom line. They can't

0:29:13.640 --> 0:29:16.800
<v Speaker 3>be growth at any cost anymore. And also at the

0:29:16.840 --> 0:29:20.160
<v Speaker 3>same time, we have this server building around artificient intelligence,

0:29:20.160 --> 0:29:22.400
<v Speaker 3>and it sort of immediately saw these crypto companies or

0:29:22.400 --> 0:29:25.520
<v Speaker 3>even dare I say Mark Zuckerberg himself talking way more

0:29:25.560 --> 0:29:27.720
<v Speaker 3>about AI than he was about the metaverse at his

0:29:27.800 --> 0:29:31.040
<v Speaker 3>last earnings, how much you've see companies being torn about

0:29:31.040 --> 0:29:33.360
<v Speaker 3>where they put their R and D or their marketing

0:29:33.400 --> 0:29:34.040
<v Speaker 3>spend to work.

0:29:34.840 --> 0:29:37.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's a great question because in some ways, you know,

0:29:37.920 --> 0:29:41.800
<v Speaker 1>super League was talking about the metaverse prior to Matter rebranding, right,

0:29:42.320 --> 0:29:45.080
<v Speaker 1>And in a way we've all had to kind of

0:29:45.120 --> 0:29:48.760
<v Speaker 1>suffer through the highs and lows of that hype cycle

0:29:48.800 --> 0:29:52.120
<v Speaker 1>a bit. I think what's exciting for the positioning of

0:29:52.160 --> 0:29:54.800
<v Speaker 1>metaverse AI, as you just saw in your previous segment,

0:29:54.840 --> 0:29:58.000
<v Speaker 1>can play a really important role in the generation of

0:29:58.280 --> 0:30:02.440
<v Speaker 1>gamified experiences and worlds, and so all those things will

0:30:02.440 --> 0:30:06.840
<v Speaker 1>only make that marketing spend or investment by brands more efficient.

0:30:07.320 --> 0:30:10.400
<v Speaker 1>But what I would say about just the term metaverse,

0:30:10.440 --> 0:30:12.160
<v Speaker 1>and I think even when I read some of the

0:30:12.200 --> 0:30:15.160
<v Speaker 1>comments that the head of metaverse a metaverse recently said

0:30:15.400 --> 0:30:18.960
<v Speaker 1>at some conferences, I think that they are showing that

0:30:19.040 --> 0:30:21.040
<v Speaker 1>there is more of a hybrid view. Now you know,

0:30:21.480 --> 0:30:25.280
<v Speaker 1>there's social media, and then there was the strong point

0:30:25.320 --> 0:30:29.440
<v Speaker 1>of view of a fully immersive metaverse world with headsets

0:30:29.480 --> 0:30:32.320
<v Speaker 1>and hardware, right, and our point of view has always

0:30:32.400 --> 0:30:34.560
<v Speaker 1>been that there is a world we're living in right

0:30:34.600 --> 0:30:39.080
<v Speaker 1>now in the middle that doesn't revolve around hardware. There's

0:30:39.120 --> 0:30:41.560
<v Speaker 1>already hundreds of millions of people who love these two

0:30:41.680 --> 0:30:43.960
<v Speaker 1>D virtual worlds that have all.

0:30:43.840 --> 0:30:45.480
<v Speaker 2>Of that same feeling of immersion.

0:30:45.520 --> 0:30:48.200
<v Speaker 1>It may not be as immersive, but it's a way

0:30:48.240 --> 0:30:51.960
<v Speaker 1>that they enjoy socializing and living. And so super League

0:30:52.000 --> 0:30:54.440
<v Speaker 1>is a publishing engine for the immersive web, and what

0:30:54.480 --> 0:30:57.080
<v Speaker 1>we're doing right now is helping brands understand that to

0:30:57.200 --> 0:30:58.680
<v Speaker 1>change their dot com experience.

0:30:59.160 --> 0:31:02.200
<v Speaker 3>Super League Game CEO and hand, thank you so much

0:31:02.200 --> 0:31:06.080
<v Speaker 3>for your time today digging into just how willing markets

0:31:06.360 --> 0:31:10.080
<v Speaker 3>I'll spend right now. Meanwhile, coming up Twitter, it's now

0:31:10.360 --> 0:31:13.280
<v Speaker 3>x you know it, Musk took that social platform well

0:31:13.400 --> 0:31:15.520
<v Speaker 3>to his favorite letter. We're going to go into the

0:31:15.600 --> 0:31:19.480
<v Speaker 3>history and just discuss what perhaps is at stake here

0:31:19.960 --> 0:31:32.200
<v Speaker 3>from New York as the blue meg technology. So Elon

0:31:32.320 --> 0:31:35.160
<v Speaker 3>Musk has explained his decision to strip Twitter of its

0:31:35.160 --> 0:31:38.200
<v Speaker 3>famous bluebird logo, saying it made sense when the platform

0:31:38.280 --> 0:31:40.440
<v Speaker 3>was just about short messages going back and forth like

0:31:40.520 --> 0:31:44.440
<v Speaker 3>birds tweeting, but now as a platform expands its character

0:31:44.480 --> 0:31:46.480
<v Speaker 3>limit and look at moves towards his vision of in

0:31:46.560 --> 0:31:49.480
<v Speaker 3>everything app says the Twitter name does not make sense

0:31:49.520 --> 0:31:52.920
<v Speaker 3>in that context, so must be adieu to the bird.

0:31:53.680 --> 0:31:56.360
<v Speaker 3>Let's talk about the brand destruction. Let's talk about X

0:31:56.360 --> 0:31:59.440
<v Speaker 3>as a historical fat point. Philip Schumacher's with a CEO

0:31:59.440 --> 0:32:02.720
<v Speaker 3>of open source identity verification platform identity dot com, also,

0:32:02.800 --> 0:32:05.200
<v Speaker 3>of course the former Apple App Store director, along with

0:32:05.200 --> 0:32:07.560
<v Speaker 3>Bluemerg's own Max Chafkin for more. Max, I want to

0:32:07.560 --> 0:32:09.720
<v Speaker 3>start with you on the history of this, because it

0:32:09.800 --> 0:32:12.160
<v Speaker 3>all felt very well wind and overnight. But actually, if

0:32:12.160 --> 0:32:14.200
<v Speaker 3>you look back at history or indeed what he was

0:32:14.240 --> 0:32:16.120
<v Speaker 3>just saying as he was looking to buy Twitter, this

0:32:16.200 --> 0:32:16.960
<v Speaker 3>kind of makes sense.

0:32:17.760 --> 0:32:21.400
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, this is very much Elon Musk essentially putting himself

0:32:21.480 --> 0:32:24.880
<v Speaker 10>in Twitter's brand, the ex brand, and this idea of

0:32:25.080 --> 0:32:27.440
<v Speaker 10>having kind of a super app goes back to the

0:32:27.520 --> 0:32:30.920
<v Speaker 10>late nineties when Elon Musk started the company that would

0:32:30.920 --> 0:32:34.280
<v Speaker 10>become PayPal. You know, the history is very interesting. Elon

0:32:34.360 --> 0:32:38.120
<v Speaker 10>Musk actually merged this company X dot com with PayPal,

0:32:38.240 --> 0:32:42.080
<v Speaker 10>became CEO, and then was ousted after a very controversial

0:32:42.120 --> 0:32:45.920
<v Speaker 10>effort to change the name from PayPal to X dot com.

0:32:46.120 --> 0:32:47.920
<v Speaker 10>At the time, a lot of employees felt like that

0:32:48.080 --> 0:32:51.280
<v Speaker 10>was a really insane decision just because PayPal had a

0:32:51.280 --> 0:32:53.400
<v Speaker 10>really great brand. It was a verb, you know, very much,

0:32:53.480 --> 0:32:54.640
<v Speaker 10>the way that Twitter.

0:32:54.280 --> 0:32:54.720
<v Speaker 3>Was a verb.

0:32:55.320 --> 0:32:57.600
<v Speaker 10>And also when you're talking about finance, right, trust and

0:32:57.640 --> 0:33:00.520
<v Speaker 10>so on is very important, and I think this issues

0:33:00.560 --> 0:33:01.440
<v Speaker 10>could be at play here.

0:33:01.680 --> 0:33:01.840
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:33:01.920 --> 0:33:05.160
<v Speaker 10>On the other hand, Elon Musk has managed to defy

0:33:05.240 --> 0:33:08.640
<v Speaker 10>the laws of business gravity many times, so it's possible

0:33:08.640 --> 0:33:10.440
<v Speaker 10>that this will look brilliant in retrospect.

0:33:11.040 --> 0:33:14.000
<v Speaker 3>Let's talk about whether it could look brilliant. Philip, from

0:33:14.040 --> 0:33:18.120
<v Speaker 3>your perspective, do you think Twitter now X could win

0:33:18.280 --> 0:33:20.720
<v Speaker 3>back not only advertisers but the consumer to have the

0:33:20.760 --> 0:33:22.640
<v Speaker 3>trust that this could be a payments player and a

0:33:22.640 --> 0:33:23.040
<v Speaker 3>big one.

0:33:24.520 --> 0:33:25.760
<v Speaker 2>Yes. Absolutely.

0:33:26.000 --> 0:33:29.280
<v Speaker 11>I see so many people writing Twitter or X's obituaries

0:33:29.360 --> 0:33:31.360
<v Speaker 11>right now saying that it's over, and I.

0:33:31.320 --> 0:33:32.480
<v Speaker 2>See the opposite right.

0:33:32.600 --> 0:33:36.640
<v Speaker 11>I see Elon fulfilling his long term dream of having

0:33:37.120 --> 0:33:39.800
<v Speaker 11>a universal app, a super app, whatever you want to

0:33:39.880 --> 0:33:42.160
<v Speaker 11>call it, that's going to do a variety of things.

0:33:42.400 --> 0:33:45.000
<v Speaker 11>He wants to change the way we pay people, the

0:33:45.040 --> 0:33:49.360
<v Speaker 11>way that people get monetized for their content. I see

0:33:49.360 --> 0:33:53.080
<v Speaker 11>this as really the beginning of something huge, and there's

0:33:53.120 --> 0:33:55.920
<v Speaker 11>no stopping Elon when he really wants something.

0:33:56.080 --> 0:33:58.680
<v Speaker 3>Philip, to your point of course, with someone who's very

0:33:58.720 --> 0:34:00.880
<v Speaker 3>much steeped in the world of Web three right now,

0:34:00.920 --> 0:34:04.360
<v Speaker 3>how much is this having to adopt Web three or

0:34:04.360 --> 0:34:06.680
<v Speaker 3>crypto or will it be more of what we were

0:34:06.720 --> 0:34:08.200
<v Speaker 3>associate PayPal and Memo with.

0:34:09.440 --> 0:34:11.680
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, I think Elon really wants to adopt crypto and

0:34:11.719 --> 0:34:14.200
<v Speaker 11>he wants to embrace the Web three ideals, but I

0:34:14.200 --> 0:34:15.760
<v Speaker 11>think that will be selling it short.

0:34:15.840 --> 0:34:17.280
<v Speaker 2>I think he needs to embrace both.

0:34:18.280 --> 0:34:20.000
<v Speaker 11>You can live in a world that's Web three and

0:34:20.040 --> 0:34:24.200
<v Speaker 11>Web two to be able to handle payments, et cetera.

0:34:24.400 --> 0:34:27.720
<v Speaker 11>I mean, he's making Twitter. It's essentially a universal name space.

0:34:28.280 --> 0:34:31.120
<v Speaker 11>People want to know who I am. I'm PBS identity.

0:34:31.840 --> 0:34:34.920
<v Speaker 11>I don't necessarily get my whole name. I get the

0:34:36.000 --> 0:34:39.160
<v Speaker 11>handle that I've chosen, and from that point on people

0:34:39.200 --> 0:34:41.440
<v Speaker 11>can send me money directly to that, and for me,

0:34:41.880 --> 0:34:45.520
<v Speaker 11>it's something that bridges this gap between Web two and

0:34:45.520 --> 0:34:46.000
<v Speaker 11>Web three.

0:34:46.640 --> 0:34:50.279
<v Speaker 3>Max. The history is so fascinating, and the fact that

0:34:50.480 --> 0:34:53.640
<v Speaker 3>he ultimately was ousted because people felt that this was

0:34:54.080 --> 0:34:57.480
<v Speaker 3>a mad move and brand destruction. How much you're reading

0:34:57.520 --> 0:35:01.680
<v Speaker 3>and feeling that ultimately we are destroying something with Twitter,

0:35:01.719 --> 0:35:04.560
<v Speaker 3>with tweets with the bird or not the actually people

0:35:04.600 --> 0:35:06.280
<v Speaker 3>want to be involved in the brand of Elon.

0:35:07.160 --> 0:35:09.000
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I mean I think if you look at Elon

0:35:09.239 --> 0:35:12.120
<v Speaker 10>Musk's history and you look for weaknesses, you know, obviously

0:35:12.160 --> 0:35:15.120
<v Speaker 10>has a lot of strengths, as philibers are saying. But

0:35:15.120 --> 0:35:18.440
<v Speaker 10>but the weakness I think is ego, right, and you've

0:35:18.480 --> 0:35:21.120
<v Speaker 10>seen it get him, get him into trouble before when

0:35:21.160 --> 0:35:23.480
<v Speaker 10>he sort of stepped in it on Twitter. And you know,

0:35:23.560 --> 0:35:27.000
<v Speaker 10>this is a case where you're taking a very well known,

0:35:27.440 --> 0:35:31.360
<v Speaker 10>very successful media brand and and and taking it apart.

0:35:31.480 --> 0:35:33.879
<v Speaker 10>And I mean the verb thing does strike me as

0:35:33.880 --> 0:35:35.520
<v Speaker 10>a as a challenge. I mean, it's hard to know.

0:35:35.640 --> 0:35:39.000
<v Speaker 10>Elon yesterday on Twitter said that they're called X's now,

0:35:39.480 --> 0:35:42.160
<v Speaker 10>which is kind of hard to say. And so I

0:35:42.480 --> 0:35:45.040
<v Speaker 10>think it's going to be a challenge. And of course

0:35:45.080 --> 0:35:48.200
<v Speaker 10>there is you know, this kind of very far out

0:35:48.280 --> 0:35:51.880
<v Speaker 10>vision of payments and so on. But number one question

0:35:52.040 --> 0:35:55.160
<v Speaker 10>is do you trust Twitter, which is run by a

0:35:55.200 --> 0:35:57.279
<v Speaker 10>guy who you know spends a lot of his day.

0:35:57.400 --> 0:35:59.560
<v Speaker 3>It is not run by a guy, or is it?

0:35:59.680 --> 0:36:02.840
<v Speaker 3>I mean that point, can Linda stare us Max.

0:36:03.200 --> 0:36:05.200
<v Speaker 10>That's a very good question, right, I mean and and

0:36:05.200 --> 0:36:07.960
<v Speaker 10>and she has come out sort of embracing this and

0:36:08.120 --> 0:36:11.479
<v Speaker 10>and very much has you on's back. I just think

0:36:11.719 --> 0:36:15.319
<v Speaker 10>the question is, you know, why buy this company for

0:36:15.320 --> 0:36:18.920
<v Speaker 10>forty four billion dollars if you were going to take

0:36:18.960 --> 0:36:21.359
<v Speaker 10>away the brand. The brand seems like it was part

0:36:21.360 --> 0:36:23.400
<v Speaker 10>of the value here. Of course, Elon Musk has a

0:36:23.440 --> 0:36:25.760
<v Speaker 10>very valuable brand as well, so I suppose we'll see.

0:36:26.000 --> 0:36:29.680
<v Speaker 3>Of course. Lastly, Philip, Apple app Store, you help build

0:36:29.719 --> 0:36:32.440
<v Speaker 3>the review operations team, you help build in and of itself.

0:36:32.840 --> 0:36:35.520
<v Speaker 3>I'm looking at the app store and this bluebird still

0:36:35.520 --> 0:36:38.520
<v Speaker 3>there and it's still called Twitter. How quickly can you

0:36:38.560 --> 0:36:40.320
<v Speaker 3>sinkly sing up? From an app perspective?

0:36:41.480 --> 0:36:43.719
<v Speaker 11>He could have He could have done a sink immediately, right.

0:36:43.760 --> 0:36:46.360
<v Speaker 11>It's it's not it's it's pretty trivial for them to

0:36:46.400 --> 0:36:48.600
<v Speaker 11>be able to submit the changes, get the get the

0:36:48.640 --> 0:36:49.960
<v Speaker 11>logo updated.

0:36:49.719 --> 0:36:52.080
<v Speaker 2>And then have the up the app updated in a

0:36:52.120 --> 0:36:52.840
<v Speaker 2>matter of hours.

0:36:53.080 --> 0:36:56.920
<v Speaker 11>So why that's taking a longer time makes me wonder

0:36:56.960 --> 0:36:59.880
<v Speaker 11>if there's some additional features that that he hasn't announced

0:36:59.880 --> 0:37:01.719
<v Speaker 11>that are going to go with it as well. Otherwise

0:37:01.880 --> 0:37:03.320
<v Speaker 11>it should have been through already.

0:37:04.000 --> 0:37:07.080
<v Speaker 3>There's a run fast mentality here. We'll see how much

0:37:07.120 --> 0:37:09.719
<v Speaker 3>they're breaking things. Philip Shoemaker, we thank you so much,

0:37:09.760 --> 0:37:13.359
<v Speaker 3>CEO of Identity dot Com. Bloomberg's Max Chafkin, brilliant, really

0:37:13.640 --> 0:37:15.600
<v Speaker 3>shining a light on the history of all of this,

0:37:15.680 --> 0:37:18.640
<v Speaker 3>and go follow his tweets because it's certainly caught my attention.

0:37:26.160 --> 0:37:28.239
<v Speaker 3>Got to talk about snap parent company, of course, the

0:37:28.280 --> 0:37:31.120
<v Speaker 3>Snapchat set to report earnings after the bell today, and

0:37:31.160 --> 0:37:32.840
<v Speaker 3>for more on what we can expect, let's bring in

0:37:32.840 --> 0:37:35.640
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg's Alex Brinka and Well a couple of years ago,

0:37:35.960 --> 0:37:38.040
<v Speaker 3>it really set the tone for the rest where the

0:37:38.080 --> 0:37:41.160
<v Speaker 3>advertising market was going for the Metas for the alphabets,

0:37:41.600 --> 0:37:43.160
<v Speaker 3>is it a bell weather anymore at the.

0:37:43.080 --> 0:37:46.479
<v Speaker 12>Moment, Alex Well, Timing wise, I would say no, because

0:37:46.520 --> 0:37:49.600
<v Speaker 12>Snap actually is reporting with alphabet on the day. But

0:37:49.680 --> 0:37:52.840
<v Speaker 12>in terms of what we can potentially expect for meta tomorrow,

0:37:53.120 --> 0:37:55.440
<v Speaker 12>we'll still be looking at snap That's because they are

0:37:55.560 --> 0:37:59.440
<v Speaker 12>kind of the pure play digital ad company who relies

0:37:59.600 --> 0:38:03.040
<v Speaker 12>on online ads on Snapchat for the vast majority of

0:38:03.080 --> 0:38:06.040
<v Speaker 12>their revenue, which has also Caroline been kind of the

0:38:06.120 --> 0:38:09.200
<v Speaker 12>problem with this stock. As economic conditions have continued to

0:38:09.239 --> 0:38:12.120
<v Speaker 12>be a little bit sluggish, their revenue is so tied

0:38:12.200 --> 0:38:15.040
<v Speaker 12>to how marketers are feeling because they are kind of

0:38:15.160 --> 0:38:20.160
<v Speaker 12>brand revenue upper funnel revenue generator, so they have been

0:38:20.400 --> 0:38:23.000
<v Speaker 12>kind of really hit hard when it comes to this

0:38:23.080 --> 0:38:26.360
<v Speaker 12>pullback and spending that we've seen from marketers across the board.

0:38:26.520 --> 0:38:29.600
<v Speaker 3>They've really tried to put themselves out there as experimental though,

0:38:29.640 --> 0:38:32.280
<v Speaker 3>and particularly around artificial intelligence. Is that going to reaped

0:38:32.280 --> 0:38:34.160
<v Speaker 3>any reward in this economic environment?

0:38:34.920 --> 0:38:36.920
<v Speaker 12>That is exactly what investors will be looking for. I

0:38:36.920 --> 0:38:40.040
<v Speaker 12>think the big question here with Snap is, Okay, you've

0:38:40.080 --> 0:38:40.800
<v Speaker 12>cut costs.

0:38:40.840 --> 0:38:41.759
<v Speaker 3>Over the last year.

0:38:41.800 --> 0:38:43.920
<v Speaker 12>We've seen them lay off twenty percent of the workforce,

0:38:44.280 --> 0:38:46.680
<v Speaker 12>rain and a lot of their spending. Things are getting

0:38:46.680 --> 0:38:49.400
<v Speaker 12>a little bit more stable, as the analyst from UBS

0:38:49.440 --> 0:38:52.160
<v Speaker 12>and JP Morgan predict they will be when they report today.

0:38:52.400 --> 0:38:55.080
<v Speaker 12>But where is the growth going to come from? Is

0:38:55.120 --> 0:38:59.200
<v Speaker 12>it artificial intelligence like they have in their chatbot, their

0:38:59.239 --> 0:39:01.799
<v Speaker 12>AI chatbot on the app. Is it going to be

0:39:01.880 --> 0:39:05.680
<v Speaker 12>augmented reality where they've built an entirely new business unit

0:39:05.719 --> 0:39:08.920
<v Speaker 12>around it earlier this year to sell that to enterprises

0:39:08.920 --> 0:39:11.680
<v Speaker 12>and retailers. We don't have a lot of that clarity yet,

0:39:11.719 --> 0:39:13.880
<v Speaker 12>and that's exactly what we'll be looking for from the

0:39:13.920 --> 0:39:16.920
<v Speaker 12>executive today. Hey, Snap, you used to be kind of

0:39:16.960 --> 0:39:19.960
<v Speaker 12>the growthy social media stock on the block. Now you've

0:39:19.960 --> 0:39:24.280
<v Speaker 12>reported one quarter, your first ever quarter of declining revenue

0:39:24.280 --> 0:39:27.600
<v Speaker 12>three months ago. We expect revenue will decline this month

0:39:27.640 --> 0:39:30.320
<v Speaker 12>as well. At what point do you come back to growth?

0:39:30.800 --> 0:39:33.160
<v Speaker 3>And to that point, just remind us of growth of

0:39:33.200 --> 0:39:36.880
<v Speaker 3>actual uses, because I mean, well, is it Threads just

0:39:36.920 --> 0:39:40.680
<v Speaker 3>eclipsed their entire US user base in about five days.

0:39:40.719 --> 0:39:44.600
<v Speaker 3>But it's a very niche, bespoke age group.

0:39:44.120 --> 0:39:47.680
<v Speaker 12>Right absolutely, And let's expect only a three percent increase

0:39:47.719 --> 0:39:49.960
<v Speaker 12>from three months ago in terms of users to around

0:39:50.040 --> 0:39:54.080
<v Speaker 12>three hundred and ninety million and change. So Threads is

0:39:54.320 --> 0:39:57.239
<v Speaker 12>right there. And obviously you can't forget about the big

0:39:57.280 --> 0:40:01.000
<v Speaker 12>private company that's been taking Snap users or their time, TikTok,

0:40:01.480 --> 0:40:04.399
<v Speaker 12>who kind of has has bullied in on this young

0:40:04.480 --> 0:40:07.120
<v Speaker 12>user group that Snap used to be very much known for.

0:40:07.239 --> 0:40:10.840
<v Speaker 12>So that kind of three percent expected user growth this

0:40:10.920 --> 0:40:14.879
<v Speaker 12>quarter is really endemic of the problem with this company. Hey,

0:40:14.920 --> 0:40:17.080
<v Speaker 12>if your revenue isn't growing, we need to see you

0:40:17.160 --> 0:40:20.880
<v Speaker 12>growing on userbase or engagement. You have this new subscription

0:40:21.000 --> 0:40:23.960
<v Speaker 12>Snapchat Plus, that folks are paying money for and Snap

0:40:24.000 --> 0:40:26.960
<v Speaker 12>has been able to convert users to pay for new features,

0:40:27.160 --> 0:40:30.160
<v Speaker 12>which has been kind of ahead of its competitors, but

0:40:30.320 --> 0:40:32.200
<v Speaker 12>as of three months ago, there were still only three

0:40:32.239 --> 0:40:34.320
<v Speaker 12>million people paying for that. We'll be looking for that

0:40:34.400 --> 0:40:37.080
<v Speaker 12>updated number as well, so that user number could be

0:40:37.160 --> 0:40:39.960
<v Speaker 12>an inflection point, but again we'll be looking for something

0:40:40.000 --> 0:40:42.040
<v Speaker 12>a little bit more strong for them as to what

0:40:42.080 --> 0:40:43.520
<v Speaker 12>to expect in the next six months.

0:40:43.680 --> 0:40:46.200
<v Speaker 3>Ax gerenca across that one hundred Mini news is in

0:40:46.360 --> 0:40:49.120
<v Speaker 3>the US and the Inner Mini worldwide. Let's see how

0:40:49.160 --> 0:40:51.399
<v Speaker 3>they grow. Thank you so much as we look ahead

0:40:51.440 --> 0:40:53.719
<v Speaker 3>to Snap. That's it for this edition of Bloom Meg Technology.

0:40:53.840 --> 0:40:56.640
<v Speaker 3>Don't forget to check out our podcast from New York.

0:40:56.920 --> 0:40:58.759
<v Speaker 3>This is Blue Meg Technology.