WEBVTT - Making work more efficient, with Juliet Schor

0:00:03.000 --> 0:00:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Before Breakfast, a production of iHeartRadio. Good Morning.

0:00:09.880 --> 0:00:14.640
<v Speaker 2>This is Laura. Welcome to the Before Breakfast podcast. Today's

0:00:14.640 --> 0:00:16.840
<v Speaker 2>episode is going to be a longer one part of

0:00:16.880 --> 0:00:20.560
<v Speaker 2>the series where I interview fascinating people about how they

0:00:20.560 --> 0:00:23.560
<v Speaker 2>take their days from great to awesome, their expertise, and

0:00:23.720 --> 0:00:26.239
<v Speaker 2>any advice they might have for the rest of us.

0:00:26.720 --> 0:00:29.360
<v Speaker 2>So today I am delighted to welcome Juliette Shore to

0:00:29.400 --> 0:00:32.560
<v Speaker 2>the show. She's a professor at Boston College, the author

0:00:32.600 --> 0:00:36.199
<v Speaker 2>of several books, including The Overworked American and a new

0:00:36.240 --> 0:00:37.320
<v Speaker 2>one called Four.

0:00:37.159 --> 0:00:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Days a Week. So, Julie, welcome to the show.

0:00:40.280 --> 0:00:41.400
<v Speaker 3>Thank you, great to be here.

0:00:41.479 --> 0:00:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Yees, So why don't you tell our listeners a little

0:00:43.320 --> 0:00:44.920
<v Speaker 1>bit about yourself and your work.

0:00:46.320 --> 0:00:53.000
<v Speaker 3>So I'm an economist originally, and I worked on issues

0:00:53.000 --> 0:00:58.040
<v Speaker 3>of work time. I was in the Harvard Economics department

0:00:58.400 --> 0:01:01.680
<v Speaker 3>when I sort of got intrigued by a sort of

0:01:01.800 --> 0:01:04.760
<v Speaker 3>theoretical error in a philosopher's book. I mean, it just

0:01:04.800 --> 0:01:06.800
<v Speaker 3>kind of a strange way to get into it, but

0:01:06.920 --> 0:01:11.200
<v Speaker 3>it got me looking at American work time, and I

0:01:11.319 --> 0:01:15.720
<v Speaker 3>was surprised to find that contrary to what everyone believed

0:01:15.760 --> 0:01:19.920
<v Speaker 3>would happen, and was happening. Americans were actually starting to

0:01:20.000 --> 0:01:22.080
<v Speaker 3>work more and more. So that book came out in

0:01:22.120 --> 0:01:25.520
<v Speaker 3>the nineteen nineties and it cataloged a couple of decades

0:01:25.560 --> 0:01:30.360
<v Speaker 3>of rising work time, high levels of stress, burnout, et cetera.

0:01:30.720 --> 0:01:36.280
<v Speaker 3>And since then I've done much more research on work

0:01:36.360 --> 0:01:39.880
<v Speaker 3>and work patterns, and in twenty twenty one, I was

0:01:39.920 --> 0:01:43.440
<v Speaker 3>invited to be the lead researcher for a path breaking

0:01:43.520 --> 0:01:47.000
<v Speaker 3>series of trials that ended up taking place all around

0:01:47.040 --> 0:01:53.000
<v Speaker 3>the world with companies who were giving their employees a

0:01:53.040 --> 0:01:56.200
<v Speaker 3>four day, thirty two hour work week, so not a

0:01:56.280 --> 0:02:01.840
<v Speaker 3>compressed with full pay, but with an attempt to try

0:02:01.840 --> 0:02:05.400
<v Speaker 3>and maintain their productivity. So a lot of the kinds

0:02:05.440 --> 0:02:09.480
<v Speaker 3>of things that go under the rubric of personal productivity

0:02:09.520 --> 0:02:12.640
<v Speaker 3>of course, that you work on and so forth. These

0:02:12.800 --> 0:02:15.920
<v Speaker 3>companies were trying to implement some of those ideas in

0:02:16.000 --> 0:02:21.040
<v Speaker 3>the workplace and the results have been phenomenal, like very

0:02:21.160 --> 0:02:25.800
<v Speaker 3>very successful, huge increases in people's well being and great

0:02:25.840 --> 0:02:27.079
<v Speaker 3>successes for the company.

0:02:27.240 --> 0:02:27.919
<v Speaker 1>Well, let's talk.

0:02:27.760 --> 0:02:30.359
<v Speaker 2>About that successes for the company, because you know, I

0:02:30.400 --> 0:02:33.040
<v Speaker 2>have many people here who are probably individual contributors listening

0:02:33.040 --> 0:02:36.320
<v Speaker 2>to this. Also people who are managing companies, running companies,

0:02:36.400 --> 0:02:39.400
<v Speaker 2>who are wondering like, Okay, I can see why, you know,

0:02:39.440 --> 0:02:42.400
<v Speaker 2>your average worker might enjoy having a four day week.

0:02:42.720 --> 0:02:44.400
<v Speaker 2>What's in it for the organizations?

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Like? Why were the organizations willing to try this out?

0:02:48.560 --> 0:02:52.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? I think there's sort of two categories, and I

0:02:52.480 --> 0:02:57.320
<v Speaker 3>talk about these in the book. The founder of the

0:02:57.440 --> 0:03:00.440
<v Speaker 3>organization that ran the trials was an entrepreneur or in

0:03:00.520 --> 0:03:03.360
<v Speaker 3>New Zealand, a man named Andrew Barnes, and he tried

0:03:03.360 --> 0:03:06.600
<v Speaker 3>it at his own finance company. He called it the

0:03:06.600 --> 0:03:09.360
<v Speaker 3>one hundred eighty hundred, so one hundred percent of the

0:03:09.400 --> 0:03:12.800
<v Speaker 3>pay for eighty percent of the time. But he asked

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:15.280
<v Speaker 3>his employees to all sign a contract saying they would

0:03:15.280 --> 0:03:17.320
<v Speaker 3>get one hundred percent of their work done in those

0:03:17.360 --> 0:03:20.000
<v Speaker 3>four days. He believed there was a lot of slack

0:03:20.120 --> 0:03:25.040
<v Speaker 3>in his organization, and many of the companies are in

0:03:25.080 --> 0:03:28.519
<v Speaker 3>that model. So what's in it for them is they're

0:03:28.560 --> 0:03:32.560
<v Speaker 3>able to maintain their productivity or maybe even increase it.

0:03:32.760 --> 0:03:34.839
<v Speaker 3>And we can get into a bit more about how

0:03:34.880 --> 0:03:38.640
<v Speaker 3>that happens. I think a key point of this is

0:03:39.360 --> 0:03:44.360
<v Speaker 3>although individuals do make changes in how they do things,

0:03:44.400 --> 0:03:48.560
<v Speaker 3>there's also a full organizational effort. I mean, often by

0:03:48.640 --> 0:03:52.240
<v Speaker 3>teams sometimes by the whole group together, and you know,

0:03:52.280 --> 0:03:55.760
<v Speaker 3>depending on size of organizations, to figure out what they're

0:03:55.800 --> 0:03:59.440
<v Speaker 3>doing that isn't efficient, you know, where they're wasting time,

0:03:59.560 --> 0:04:02.640
<v Speaker 3>where they putting a lot of time into low value activities,

0:04:02.720 --> 0:04:11.280
<v Speaker 3>et cetera. And so the organization maintains its productivity, but

0:04:11.360 --> 0:04:17.720
<v Speaker 3>it gets big well being impacts for its employees. And

0:04:17.839 --> 0:04:21.680
<v Speaker 3>that has multiple impacts. One is that often they report

0:04:21.720 --> 0:04:25.000
<v Speaker 3>better quality of work because people are rested, they're not

0:04:25.839 --> 0:04:28.719
<v Speaker 3>burning out, they are looking forward to coming to work

0:04:28.839 --> 0:04:32.480
<v Speaker 3>on Monday morning. Many of them take Fridays off, they

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:34.960
<v Speaker 3>don't get the Sunday scaries, et cetera. So there's that

0:04:35.279 --> 0:04:39.560
<v Speaker 3>piece of it, but that also leads to the other

0:04:40.880 --> 0:04:44.560
<v Speaker 3>interesting phenomenon that I call the one hundred eighty eighties.

0:04:46.000 --> 0:04:48.880
<v Speaker 3>One hundred percent of the pay eighty percent of the work.

0:04:49.040 --> 0:04:51.520
<v Speaker 3>We're not asking you to do anything more. We're not

0:04:51.680 --> 0:04:55.760
<v Speaker 3>asking you to get more efficient. Why you're already crazy efficient.

0:04:55.960 --> 0:04:58.880
<v Speaker 3>You are a nurse in a hospital with no wasted time.

0:04:59.360 --> 0:05:02.520
<v Speaker 3>You're the chef ft a restaurant who's just working a

0:05:02.560 --> 0:05:08.960
<v Speaker 3>really long day and you've already optimized out anything time wasting.

0:05:09.680 --> 0:05:12.480
<v Speaker 3>But you're burned out and so you just need a

0:05:12.600 --> 0:05:19.640
<v Speaker 3>day off to recharge. And so for those companies or organizations,

0:05:20.000 --> 0:05:25.400
<v Speaker 3>they're stopping the bleeding of the burnout, the resignations, et cetera. So,

0:05:26.000 --> 0:05:29.200
<v Speaker 3>for example, with some of the nurses in our studies,

0:05:29.560 --> 0:05:32.720
<v Speaker 3>they rescinded resignation letters when they heard they were going

0:05:32.760 --> 0:05:35.360
<v Speaker 3>to get a four day week. And for these people

0:05:35.480 --> 0:05:38.480
<v Speaker 3>it's just life changing because they're kind of on the edge.

0:05:38.520 --> 0:05:42.680
<v Speaker 3>So it's a paradox I argue because it's the low

0:05:42.720 --> 0:05:46.520
<v Speaker 3>intensity organizations that could actually you know, they got a

0:05:46.560 --> 0:05:49.719
<v Speaker 3>lot of slack there and they're really high intensity that

0:05:50.040 --> 0:05:52.679
<v Speaker 3>at the beginning are sort of the early adopters here

0:05:53.880 --> 0:05:57.200
<v Speaker 3>where it's very easy to see how they might benefit.

0:05:57.400 --> 0:06:00.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, especially on that latter one, because what I

0:06:00.960 --> 0:06:03.479
<v Speaker 2>think a lot of people don't understand is the toll

0:06:03.520 --> 0:06:08.039
<v Speaker 2>that turnover takes on productivity. That you know, if you

0:06:08.120 --> 0:06:11.279
<v Speaker 2>have your five member team running at full tilt, that's great,

0:06:11.880 --> 0:06:14.840
<v Speaker 2>but when one of them leaves, you are suddenly not

0:06:14.920 --> 0:06:18.719
<v Speaker 2>running at full tilt until you can you know, hire replacement,

0:06:18.839 --> 0:06:21.520
<v Speaker 2>train that person. You know, for the first however much

0:06:21.600 --> 0:06:24.640
<v Speaker 2>time they are not you know, operating at where that

0:06:24.680 --> 0:06:28.760
<v Speaker 2>person was who left and you're also encouraging management costs

0:06:28.839 --> 0:06:30.159
<v Speaker 2>in training the person.

0:06:30.760 --> 0:06:32.919
<v Speaker 1>And so from an organizational perspective, if you.

0:06:32.960 --> 0:06:36.560
<v Speaker 2>Can cut that at all, you boost productivity even if

0:06:36.560 --> 0:06:39.400
<v Speaker 2>the average person is working fewer hours.

0:06:39.440 --> 0:06:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Is that's what I'm hearing you say?

0:06:41.720 --> 0:06:44.440
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, Laura, I mean that is such an important point.

0:06:44.560 --> 0:06:48.719
<v Speaker 3>So I have a sort of deep dive into a

0:06:48.839 --> 0:06:54.680
<v Speaker 3>company where that was so interesting what happened. And the

0:06:55.680 --> 0:06:57.680
<v Speaker 3>book is both a lot of you know, kind of

0:06:58.040 --> 0:07:04.040
<v Speaker 3>statistical findings, but also those deep dives into individual companies

0:07:04.040 --> 0:07:10.160
<v Speaker 3>that represent different ways, strategies, experiences. So this one is

0:07:10.200 --> 0:07:15.960
<v Speaker 3>a global marketing company and advertising and marketing. They were

0:07:17.120 --> 0:07:22.200
<v Speaker 3>the person who ran the trial, the manager saying like

0:07:22.440 --> 0:07:27.720
<v Speaker 3>thirty to forty percent turnover in that industry. And so

0:07:28.400 --> 0:07:31.640
<v Speaker 3>what she figured out she did a lot of calculations

0:07:31.640 --> 0:07:34.320
<v Speaker 3>with their accounting people to figure out how much it costs.

0:07:34.320 --> 0:07:36.680
<v Speaker 3>But when she went the company, which is a lot,

0:07:36.720 --> 0:07:38.520
<v Speaker 3>and she said on her team, she had a fifty

0:07:38.560 --> 0:07:44.120
<v Speaker 3>seven person team, they're constantly onboarding, hiring, training, et cetera.

0:07:45.120 --> 0:07:48.040
<v Speaker 3>And when she put in the four day week, she

0:07:48.120 --> 0:07:52.080
<v Speaker 3>went to zero resignations, zero turnover. Okay, And that we

0:07:52.160 --> 0:07:56.360
<v Speaker 3>hear that from quite a few of our companies. And

0:07:56.520 --> 0:07:59.800
<v Speaker 3>then what was so fascinating about it was she began

0:07:59.840 --> 0:08:04.440
<v Speaker 3>to figure out, I can monetize this in my contracts.

0:08:05.280 --> 0:08:10.480
<v Speaker 3>So she put in, we get a bonus if no

0:08:10.520 --> 0:08:13.920
<v Speaker 3>one leaves the team, and the clients just couldn't believe

0:08:13.960 --> 0:08:21.400
<v Speaker 3>it because like table, yeah, and sure enough, and so

0:08:22.360 --> 0:08:26.080
<v Speaker 3>it's yeah, it's really I mean there's very cold, hard

0:08:26.160 --> 0:08:29.440
<v Speaker 3>cash here sitting on the table, lying on the lying

0:08:29.480 --> 0:08:32.120
<v Speaker 3>on the table, if you will, if you can stop

0:08:32.240 --> 0:08:35.839
<v Speaker 3>that those resignations in those high turnover places, and that's

0:08:35.880 --> 0:08:40.120
<v Speaker 3>why we're hearing from like social service agencies, restaurants, healthcare.

0:08:40.320 --> 0:08:42.960
<v Speaker 3>I mean, these are many of the places which have

0:08:43.200 --> 0:08:48.600
<v Speaker 3>had these big turnover problems in recent years. And you know,

0:08:48.679 --> 0:08:51.840
<v Speaker 3>of course advertising and marketing, there's a lot of a

0:08:51.840 --> 0:08:53.800
<v Speaker 3>lot of those kinds of companies in our sample.

0:08:53.920 --> 0:08:56.240
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, Well, we're going to take a quick ad break

0:08:56.240 --> 0:09:05.640
<v Speaker 2>and then I will be back with more from Juliette Shore. Well,

0:09:05.679 --> 0:09:08.320
<v Speaker 2>I am back talking with Juliette Shore, who's the author

0:09:08.400 --> 0:09:11.240
<v Speaker 2>of the new book Four Days a Week, looking at

0:09:11.280 --> 0:09:14.360
<v Speaker 2>the results of a broad experiment with a number of

0:09:14.440 --> 0:09:18.079
<v Speaker 2>organizations that experimented with a four day work week. So

0:09:18.200 --> 0:09:21.359
<v Speaker 2>Julie we were talking about very you know, intensely structured organizations.

0:09:21.360 --> 0:09:25.120
<v Speaker 2>We're reducing turnover had a positive benefit. Now we mentioned

0:09:25.120 --> 0:09:27.480
<v Speaker 2>that there's also some you know, organizations that have a

0:09:27.520 --> 0:09:28.360
<v Speaker 2>fair amount.

0:09:28.120 --> 0:09:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Of slack in how people are working.

0:09:32.480 --> 0:09:34.440
<v Speaker 2>And I'm sure you and I have both seen the

0:09:34.440 --> 0:09:37.480
<v Speaker 2>time diaries of people at some organizations. Who are you know,

0:09:37.600 --> 0:09:42.520
<v Speaker 2>in meetings all day or who are you know, switching

0:09:42.559 --> 0:09:47.080
<v Speaker 2>applications frequently? You know as they're constantly interrupted? You know,

0:09:47.080 --> 0:09:50.000
<v Speaker 2>what's going on in those organizations and how are they

0:09:50.120 --> 0:09:54.280
<v Speaker 2>sort of thinking about becoming more productive instead of just

0:09:54.360 --> 0:09:56.440
<v Speaker 2>assuming that there's kind of an infinite number.

0:09:56.200 --> 0:09:58.199
<v Speaker 1>Of hours that you can you can put out a task.

0:09:59.320 --> 0:10:04.959
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so that's probably the more common kind of organization

0:10:05.200 --> 0:10:11.559
<v Speaker 3>among the hundreds that we have been studying. So for them,

0:10:12.160 --> 0:10:16.280
<v Speaker 3>I would say ground zero has been meetings, and that's

0:10:16.320 --> 0:10:20.359
<v Speaker 3>a kind of well known problem in these kinds of organizations.

0:10:20.400 --> 0:10:26.760
<v Speaker 3>So when a company joins one of these trials, there's

0:10:26.800 --> 0:10:31.720
<v Speaker 3>a they're sort of groups of companies doing it together

0:10:31.840 --> 0:10:36.080
<v Speaker 3>and they do two months of onboarding and what we

0:10:36.160 --> 0:10:40.120
<v Speaker 3>call work reorganization where we figure out with them, they

0:10:40.160 --> 0:10:43.200
<v Speaker 3>go through these trainings and so on for they get

0:10:43.200 --> 0:10:46.480
<v Speaker 3>peer mentors people who have done it before figure out

0:10:46.520 --> 0:10:50.480
<v Speaker 3>where they're wasting time. So meetings is a key place,

0:10:50.760 --> 0:10:53.640
<v Speaker 3>and a lot of them make their meetings more productive.

0:10:53.679 --> 0:10:57.400
<v Speaker 3>They reduce their numbers of meetings, and there's a you know,

0:10:57.440 --> 0:11:00.760
<v Speaker 3>there's like a huge amount of literature now on meetings

0:11:00.800 --> 0:11:04.960
<v Speaker 3>and sort of how they're affecting productivity in many organizations.

0:11:06.000 --> 0:11:09.760
<v Speaker 3>The flip side of that is the focus time. Because

0:11:09.760 --> 0:11:15.199
<v Speaker 3>of that distraction problem, so many of these organizations also

0:11:16.880 --> 0:11:20.600
<v Speaker 3>set times in the day when people will have focused

0:11:20.600 --> 0:11:22.800
<v Speaker 3>time and they shouldn't be bothered and so forth, and

0:11:22.840 --> 0:11:25.400
<v Speaker 3>there will be no meetings, et cetera. Other people can

0:11:25.440 --> 0:11:29.480
<v Speaker 3>do that sort of individually, but then there are other

0:11:29.800 --> 0:11:33.679
<v Speaker 3>sorts of things that they do to figure out how

0:11:33.679 --> 0:11:37.240
<v Speaker 3>to make it work. So in some of the manufacturing companies,

0:11:37.280 --> 0:11:40.200
<v Speaker 3>they do like a process engineering exercise where they go

0:11:40.240 --> 0:11:44.640
<v Speaker 3>through every stage of their process and figure out where

0:11:44.679 --> 0:11:48.719
<v Speaker 3>they wasting time. Where could they slot one thing one

0:11:48.800 --> 0:11:51.600
<v Speaker 3>task into a dead time with another task. If they

0:11:51.679 --> 0:11:54.760
<v Speaker 3>you know the brewery that I talk about in the book,

0:11:54.800 --> 0:11:58.480
<v Speaker 3>they have many different tasks going on it once. But

0:11:58.640 --> 0:12:01.040
<v Speaker 3>the same thing can be done in way call organizations

0:12:01.040 --> 0:12:05.079
<v Speaker 3>where you sort of follow the chain of decision making

0:12:05.440 --> 0:12:09.200
<v Speaker 3>or you follow you know, a form going through all

0:12:09.240 --> 0:12:11.720
<v Speaker 3>the steps, and so they do those sorts of things.

0:12:12.080 --> 0:12:16.440
<v Speaker 3>One interesting one at Kickstarter, which was the lead company

0:12:16.480 --> 0:12:20.760
<v Speaker 3>in our first US trial, was that they realized the

0:12:20.840 --> 0:12:25.960
<v Speaker 3>leadership team was not giving clear enough instructions to the programmers,

0:12:26.240 --> 0:12:28.560
<v Speaker 3>you know, when they wanted them to do something, and

0:12:28.600 --> 0:12:32.240
<v Speaker 3>they would get stuck or go down the wrong fork

0:12:32.880 --> 0:12:36.480
<v Speaker 3>for a while. So leadership team figured out how it

0:12:36.559 --> 0:12:41.360
<v Speaker 3>could make its intentions clearer to itself to begin with,

0:12:41.640 --> 0:12:46.679
<v Speaker 3>and then give better instructions to the programming teams and

0:12:46.760 --> 0:12:50.440
<v Speaker 3>then kind of just let them run with things. One

0:12:50.480 --> 0:12:55.600
<v Speaker 3>other thing really important in certain kinds of businesses. We

0:12:55.720 --> 0:13:00.960
<v Speaker 3>had a broadband provider that got a massive new contract

0:13:01.000 --> 0:13:03.520
<v Speaker 3>at the same time that they went to the four

0:13:03.559 --> 0:13:06.200
<v Speaker 3>day week, and we did in addition to all the

0:13:06.280 --> 0:13:09.080
<v Speaker 3>surveying we did before and after interviews with this group,

0:13:09.480 --> 0:13:12.320
<v Speaker 3>and when we came back to them, we were like, well,

0:13:12.920 --> 0:13:15.160
<v Speaker 3>how did you make it work? You had this huge

0:13:15.200 --> 0:13:19.720
<v Speaker 3>influx of business and mostly it was like dealing with

0:13:19.760 --> 0:13:24.400
<v Speaker 3>customer service problems, connecting and so forth. And what they

0:13:24.480 --> 0:13:29.240
<v Speaker 3>explained was, well, they finally got serious about documentation. They said,

0:13:29.280 --> 0:13:31.160
<v Speaker 3>first of all, no, the four day week is what

0:13:31.240 --> 0:13:34.840
<v Speaker 3>made it viable. Otherwise everybody would have burned out. But

0:13:34.920 --> 0:13:38.440
<v Speaker 3>they got serious about documentation something. And this is a

0:13:38.440 --> 0:13:41.079
<v Speaker 3>more general point, like if you don't put the time

0:13:41.120 --> 0:13:45.199
<v Speaker 3>in upfront to save you time later, you're going to

0:13:45.240 --> 0:13:48.480
<v Speaker 3>get overloaded. And so you know, their people had previously

0:13:48.520 --> 0:13:52.880
<v Speaker 3>been reinventing the wheel with customer service, but now they documented.

0:13:52.920 --> 0:13:57.400
<v Speaker 3>And that's a more general point to which I think

0:13:57.440 --> 0:14:01.080
<v Speaker 3>many of us, you know, don't do it, which is

0:14:01.080 --> 0:14:03.640
<v Speaker 3>you get some new piece of software, equipment, whatever, you

0:14:03.640 --> 0:14:05.960
<v Speaker 3>don't spend the time at the beginning learning how to

0:14:06.000 --> 0:14:09.000
<v Speaker 3>make it more efficient for you because you just want

0:14:09.040 --> 0:14:12.679
<v Speaker 3>to get going. And I call it the forcing mechanism

0:14:12.800 --> 0:14:15.200
<v Speaker 3>of the four day week because it forces you to

0:14:15.280 --> 0:14:16.920
<v Speaker 3>get more efficient earlier on.

0:14:17.360 --> 0:14:17.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:14:17.840 --> 0:14:20.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, just in general, I think a lot of people

0:14:20.680 --> 0:14:24.840
<v Speaker 2>and probably organizations too, just don't treat time as valuable.

0:14:24.880 --> 0:14:26.000
<v Speaker 1>And it's one thing.

0:14:26.000 --> 0:14:28.880
<v Speaker 2>If you're paying somebody by the hour, because then obviously

0:14:28.920 --> 0:14:31.680
<v Speaker 2>you know how many hours they are working and there's

0:14:31.720 --> 0:14:38.160
<v Speaker 2>a you know, natural accountability on that. But for people

0:14:38.200 --> 0:14:42.640
<v Speaker 2>who aren't, there just isn't that accountability. It is why

0:14:42.680 --> 0:14:45.440
<v Speaker 2>you see one of these things. But with that I

0:14:45.440 --> 0:14:47.080
<v Speaker 2>think you mentioned in the book that it was harder

0:14:47.120 --> 0:14:50.360
<v Speaker 2>for managers though to adopt this sort of.

0:14:51.040 --> 0:14:57.400
<v Speaker 3>Schedule, especially the scene, especially seniors. Yes, so what we

0:14:57.640 --> 0:15:02.720
<v Speaker 3>heard a bit more from them is more some of

0:15:02.760 --> 0:15:05.320
<v Speaker 3>them took that day off and that was it. So

0:15:05.760 --> 0:15:07.600
<v Speaker 3>I don't want to make it seem like none of

0:15:07.640 --> 0:15:11.240
<v Speaker 3>them were successful with this, but what some of them

0:15:11.280 --> 0:15:14.160
<v Speaker 3>would do is use it a little bit as a

0:15:14.160 --> 0:15:18.360
<v Speaker 3>catch up day because nobody else was working. So this

0:15:18.400 --> 0:15:19.320
<v Speaker 3>is another key thing.

0:15:19.560 --> 0:15:21.120
<v Speaker 1>So you don't have any meetings.

0:15:21.160 --> 0:15:23.200
<v Speaker 3>You don't have any meetings, and you don't have people

0:15:23.240 --> 0:15:29.040
<v Speaker 3>giving you work. And that's also an important principle when

0:15:29.080 --> 0:15:31.040
<v Speaker 3>companies think about how are you going to do this?

0:15:31.120 --> 0:15:32.560
<v Speaker 3>Is everybody going to be off on the same day,

0:15:32.560 --> 0:15:35.440
<v Speaker 3>because that's one way of making sure that people don't

0:15:35.520 --> 0:15:38.840
<v Speaker 3>just get overloaded when they come back because their coworkers

0:15:38.880 --> 0:15:42.800
<v Speaker 3>were putting more on their plate. They use it as

0:15:42.800 --> 0:15:46.000
<v Speaker 3>a catch up day, or they you know, they work

0:15:46.040 --> 0:15:48.600
<v Speaker 3>a little bit on that day. They can't take it

0:15:48.640 --> 0:15:51.960
<v Speaker 3>totally off. But part of what that means is they

0:15:51.960 --> 0:15:54.240
<v Speaker 3>don't have to do as much work on weekends and nights,

0:15:54.720 --> 0:15:57.440
<v Speaker 3>so they are getting a break. It's just a little

0:15:57.480 --> 0:16:01.520
<v Speaker 3>bit different number one, I did. She talked to me

0:16:01.600 --> 0:16:04.960
<v Speaker 3>about how she would work from home that day and

0:16:05.040 --> 0:16:07.600
<v Speaker 3>she'd feel free to put in laundry, pick up her daughter,

0:16:07.720 --> 0:16:10.560
<v Speaker 3>this than that, which on a regular work from home

0:16:10.640 --> 0:16:13.120
<v Speaker 3>day she wouldn't feel she could do that. And so

0:16:13.160 --> 0:16:16.000
<v Speaker 3>it was just it was a huge blessing to them

0:16:16.040 --> 0:16:18.720
<v Speaker 3>as well, even if they didn't manage to reduce by

0:16:18.760 --> 0:16:20.880
<v Speaker 3>the full eight hours that many of their.

0:16:20.720 --> 0:16:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Co workers do.

0:16:21.760 --> 0:16:23.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, I wonder and I think you talk a

0:16:23.960 --> 0:16:28.080
<v Speaker 2>little bit about this, that there's some drifting toward this,

0:16:28.720 --> 0:16:32.160
<v Speaker 2>especially as you know, if you think about summer Fridays

0:16:32.280 --> 0:16:35.160
<v Speaker 2>or more, people are sort of working from home on Fridays,

0:16:35.160 --> 0:16:35.920
<v Speaker 2>not that they're not working.

0:16:36.000 --> 0:16:37.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I want to put that out there. I'm

0:16:37.120 --> 0:16:38.320
<v Speaker 1>a big fan of working from home.

0:16:38.320 --> 0:16:41.160
<v Speaker 2>People working from home generally are working, but they're probably

0:16:41.240 --> 0:16:43.040
<v Speaker 2>is a tendency to leave a little bit earlier on

0:16:43.360 --> 0:16:45.640
<v Speaker 2>a Friday, if it's a work from home day for instance.

0:16:46.400 --> 0:16:48.840
<v Speaker 3>And we are seeing, yeah, this is great. I call

0:16:48.880 --> 0:16:52.560
<v Speaker 3>it the evolution of Fridays. We are seeing this showing

0:16:52.640 --> 0:16:56.320
<v Speaker 3>up in hard numbers, interesting numbers, like in finance numbers,

0:16:56.960 --> 0:17:02.840
<v Speaker 3>where like stock traders and other kinds of people, there's

0:17:03.120 --> 0:17:08.400
<v Speaker 3>less activity going on, or studies of business people responding

0:17:08.440 --> 0:17:14.040
<v Speaker 3>to surveys. And this is actually one of the interviews

0:17:14.080 --> 0:17:17.840
<v Speaker 3>of a guy a marketing the head of a marketing

0:17:17.880 --> 0:17:22.719
<v Speaker 3>company talk to me about how by taking Fridays off,

0:17:22.960 --> 0:17:27.120
<v Speaker 3>there really wasn't as much going off on Fridays anyway,

0:17:27.240 --> 0:17:29.919
<v Speaker 3>So Friday is no longer a sort of twenty percent

0:17:30.000 --> 0:17:34.800
<v Speaker 3>productivity day in lots of places. And then I you know,

0:17:35.080 --> 0:17:37.640
<v Speaker 3>I've got a lot of anecdotal stuff in there about

0:17:38.240 --> 0:17:42.440
<v Speaker 3>how things really have evolved to be different on Fridays,

0:17:44.160 --> 0:17:49.920
<v Speaker 3>and it's just it is evolving into less of a workday,

0:17:50.119 --> 0:17:51.600
<v Speaker 3>especially Friday afternoons.

0:17:51.680 --> 0:17:54.879
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, there's I mean, there's obviously some caveats here.

0:17:54.880 --> 0:17:56.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean people are like, well, okay, four day's great,

0:17:56.440 --> 0:17:58.040
<v Speaker 1>how about three? How about two? You know, I mean

0:17:58.560 --> 0:17:59.360
<v Speaker 1>there's there's.

0:17:59.119 --> 0:18:02.440
<v Speaker 2>Some limits on this obviously, of how much productivity we

0:18:02.840 --> 0:18:06.000
<v Speaker 2>can wreak out of the ring out of the system.

0:18:06.440 --> 0:18:09.680
<v Speaker 2>And then also with that, one of the caveats being

0:18:09.720 --> 0:18:12.879
<v Speaker 2>that I imagine one of the things that makes this

0:18:12.960 --> 0:18:17.399
<v Speaker 2>extra weekday off useful is that places are open that

0:18:17.440 --> 0:18:19.400
<v Speaker 2>you could then go. I mean, one of the things

0:18:19.400 --> 0:18:21.560
<v Speaker 2>people are doing is they're doing their grocery shopping, or

0:18:21.600 --> 0:18:23.400
<v Speaker 2>they're going to the doctor, or they're you know, doing

0:18:23.480 --> 0:18:27.280
<v Speaker 2>those life maintenance things, which we couldn't then have every

0:18:27.359 --> 0:18:30.280
<v Speaker 2>place only open a certain limited number of days or

0:18:30.280 --> 0:18:31.680
<v Speaker 2>we'd lose that benefit.

0:18:32.680 --> 0:18:36.680
<v Speaker 3>Oh absolutely. I mean there are many organizations in our

0:18:38.119 --> 0:18:40.840
<v Speaker 3>trials that are twenty four to seven organizations and they're

0:18:40.880 --> 0:18:46.200
<v Speaker 3>still twenty four sevens or that are five days. That

0:18:46.320 --> 0:18:51.000
<v Speaker 3>marketing person I was just talking about his company went

0:18:51.080 --> 0:18:54.719
<v Speaker 3>to half teams on Monday and Friday because they wanted

0:18:56.200 --> 0:19:00.640
<v Speaker 3>a full forty hour availability for their clients for example.

0:19:02.200 --> 0:19:05.320
<v Speaker 3>You know, another message of the book is that there

0:19:05.359 --> 0:19:09.560
<v Speaker 3>isn't a one formula for this, that each of these

0:19:09.600 --> 0:19:12.240
<v Speaker 3>companies sort of figures out what's going to work for

0:19:12.359 --> 0:19:17.600
<v Speaker 3>them based on their their business, their what their employees want,

0:19:17.920 --> 0:19:21.280
<v Speaker 3>you know a lot of different factors. But yeah, absolutely

0:19:22.400 --> 0:19:28.080
<v Speaker 3>you need to Uh, if you're an access business, good

0:19:28.119 --> 0:19:29.879
<v Speaker 3>chance you're going to keep that access.

0:19:29.960 --> 0:19:31.479
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, that people are counting on that.

0:19:31.720 --> 0:19:33.320
<v Speaker 2>We're going to take one more quick ad break and

0:19:33.320 --> 0:19:35.160
<v Speaker 2>then I will be back with more from Juliette Shore.

0:19:42.440 --> 0:19:42.600
<v Speaker 3>Well.

0:19:42.640 --> 0:19:45.080
<v Speaker 2>I am back talking with Juliette Shore who is the

0:19:45.119 --> 0:19:47.240
<v Speaker 2>author of the new book Four Days a week.

0:19:47.920 --> 0:19:49.680
<v Speaker 1>So, Julia, we always like to.

0:19:49.920 --> 0:19:54.040
<v Speaker 2>Hear about how people manage their own personal productivity. I mean,

0:19:54.040 --> 0:19:57.080
<v Speaker 2>you're obviously, you know, leading research and writing books and

0:19:57.840 --> 0:20:00.040
<v Speaker 2>being a public intellectual about things like that, and I

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:02.359
<v Speaker 2>I assume have duties at your university as well.

0:20:02.920 --> 0:20:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Do you have any routines that make you more productive?

0:20:08.520 --> 0:20:11.440
<v Speaker 3>It's funny you ask this, because I do. Just we

0:20:11.440 --> 0:20:14.760
<v Speaker 3>were just talking about the Friday evolving thing. I mean,

0:20:14.800 --> 0:20:18.360
<v Speaker 3>I often get asked when I wrote The Overworked American,

0:20:18.440 --> 0:20:21.439
<v Speaker 3>I was always asked how many hours a week do

0:20:21.480 --> 0:20:25.040
<v Speaker 3>you work? And at that point I was like the

0:20:25.080 --> 0:20:29.639
<v Speaker 3>poster child for needing a makeover by you, which was

0:20:29.960 --> 0:20:32.680
<v Speaker 3>I was in the office long, long hours, and many

0:20:32.720 --> 0:20:33.840
<v Speaker 3>of them were not productive.

0:20:34.040 --> 0:20:34.679
<v Speaker 1>It was okay.

0:20:34.840 --> 0:20:37.960
<v Speaker 3>The office was also my socializing place. I didn't have kids,

0:20:37.960 --> 0:20:42.520
<v Speaker 3>I wasn't married in those early days. So with this one,

0:20:42.560 --> 0:20:44.520
<v Speaker 3>of course, I get asked how many days a week

0:20:44.600 --> 0:20:46.760
<v Speaker 3>I work? And I always used to say, well, I

0:20:46.840 --> 0:20:48.439
<v Speaker 3>just work when I want and I don't work when

0:20:48.480 --> 0:20:50.040
<v Speaker 3>I don't feel like it, et cetera, et cetera. But

0:20:50.119 --> 0:20:54.600
<v Speaker 3>I noticed about two weeks ago someone asked me that

0:20:54.800 --> 0:20:57.760
<v Speaker 3>and I was like, you know, what Friday is evolving

0:20:57.800 --> 0:21:04.080
<v Speaker 3>away from a workday for me, so productivity. Yeah, So

0:21:04.160 --> 0:21:07.520
<v Speaker 3>I do think taking that Friday has really helped me.

0:21:08.040 --> 0:21:11.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm feeling pretty relaxed, despite you know, juggling a lot

0:21:11.200 --> 0:21:17.560
<v Speaker 3>of balls. When I am writing a book or articles,

0:21:17.720 --> 0:21:21.119
<v Speaker 3>I start first thing in the morning, after exercise, so

0:21:21.160 --> 0:21:24.240
<v Speaker 3>I have started a morning exercise routine. I do my

0:21:24.359 --> 0:21:29.440
<v Speaker 3>exercising first thing in the morning. I actually run exercise classes.

0:21:29.480 --> 0:21:32.080
<v Speaker 3>I'm not the teacher. I just put on the tape

0:21:32.200 --> 0:21:35.840
<v Speaker 3>and do the zoom room. But it means I have

0:21:35.920 --> 0:21:40.800
<v Speaker 3>that accountability to the other people who come. And then

0:21:40.960 --> 0:21:44.439
<v Speaker 3>I then I, you know, go trudge up to my

0:21:44.480 --> 0:21:48.119
<v Speaker 3>third floor and start writing. I do find that first

0:21:48.880 --> 0:21:52.280
<v Speaker 3>period of the day, the morning, is most productive. I

0:21:52.400 --> 0:21:56.719
<v Speaker 3>write until I just peter out. You know. If I'm

0:21:56.720 --> 0:21:59.880
<v Speaker 3>writing a book, for example, and that works really well

0:21:59.920 --> 0:22:03.720
<v Speaker 3>for me, I just do that. What are some of

0:22:03.720 --> 0:22:06.720
<v Speaker 3>my other tips? So I think those are the two

0:22:06.760 --> 0:22:10.119
<v Speaker 3>most important things, Like I have a dedicated place and

0:22:10.240 --> 0:22:13.840
<v Speaker 3>time for my most And you say that you made

0:22:13.840 --> 0:22:16.400
<v Speaker 3>that point about trying to do the hardest thing first.

0:22:17.040 --> 0:22:17.760
<v Speaker 1>I always do that.

0:22:17.880 --> 0:22:20.159
<v Speaker 3>Now with writing a book, I always start with my

0:22:20.200 --> 0:22:31.960
<v Speaker 3>hardest chapter and dedicated time, place, exercise routine. And then

0:22:32.119 --> 0:22:34.840
<v Speaker 3>I think also that point I started with just making

0:22:34.840 --> 0:22:38.359
<v Speaker 3>sure I have enough rest time and relaxation, and that

0:22:38.440 --> 0:22:41.480
<v Speaker 3>I'm not feeling like I work all the time and

0:22:41.520 --> 0:22:43.800
<v Speaker 3>I don't have time to do other things that I want.

0:22:43.880 --> 0:22:47.119
<v Speaker 3>I just I just you know, I'm lucky because I

0:22:47.280 --> 0:22:51.760
<v Speaker 3>control my own time basically, so I take as much

0:22:53.480 --> 0:22:57.560
<v Speaker 3>time non work time as I feel I want. And

0:22:57.600 --> 0:23:00.479
<v Speaker 3>that also makes the working so much easier because I'm

0:23:00.520 --> 0:23:02.560
<v Speaker 3>not feeling like, oh, I have to work all the time.

0:23:02.760 --> 0:23:06.440
<v Speaker 3>Occasionally during the semester when I'm teaching, I sometimes feel like, oh,

0:23:06.480 --> 0:23:09.560
<v Speaker 3>why am I working so much? But that's you know,

0:23:09.680 --> 0:23:11.920
<v Speaker 3>that's the part of my job I can't really control.

0:23:12.080 --> 0:23:16.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, that comes with the territory, So dealing with people's

0:23:17.080 --> 0:23:19.719
<v Speaker 2>messages and questions all the time, I am sure in

0:23:19.760 --> 0:23:23.600
<v Speaker 2>that role. Well, I always ask guests something and man,

0:23:23.720 --> 0:23:25.359
<v Speaker 2>we can talk about the things maybe that you do

0:23:25.440 --> 0:23:28.159
<v Speaker 2>in your non working hours. What is something you have

0:23:28.240 --> 0:23:31.280
<v Speaker 2>done recently to take a day from great to awesome?

0:23:35.560 --> 0:23:41.439
<v Speaker 3>The delayed Mother's Day celebration, so my favorite thing to

0:23:41.480 --> 0:23:43.720
<v Speaker 3>do is to take a bike ride. On a Sunday,

0:23:44.520 --> 0:23:47.720
<v Speaker 3>took a bike ride with my son, which was really wonderful,

0:23:47.880 --> 0:23:52.040
<v Speaker 3>and then went out with son and husband sadly daughters

0:23:52.080 --> 0:23:57.840
<v Speaker 3>on the other coast to our favorite vegetarian restaurant and

0:23:58.080 --> 0:24:04.639
<v Speaker 3>had an awesome meal and then watched a playoff basketball

0:24:04.680 --> 0:24:09.760
<v Speaker 3>game for my wonderful team that sadly lost, the Boston Celtic.

0:24:11.320 --> 0:24:14.840
<v Speaker 2>We can guess where you are, and yes, sadly, well,

0:24:14.880 --> 0:24:16.959
<v Speaker 2>I'm not a I'm not a Boston fan myself, but

0:24:17.280 --> 0:24:20.040
<v Speaker 2>I understand, I understand the feeling and the Sixers here

0:24:20.080 --> 0:24:23.720
<v Speaker 2>have been a long string of disappointments lately, so yeah,

0:24:23.760 --> 0:24:25.720
<v Speaker 2>it's sure, you know, oh well.

0:24:26.200 --> 0:24:28.880
<v Speaker 1>Some yere some here and what are you looking forward

0:24:28.920 --> 0:24:29.400
<v Speaker 1>to now?

0:24:31.600 --> 0:24:36.960
<v Speaker 3>So two big things. One is we are extending our

0:24:37.680 --> 0:24:41.400
<v Speaker 3>research into looking at the relationship between the four day

0:24:41.400 --> 0:24:45.640
<v Speaker 3>week and AI. So our hypothesis is that four day

0:24:45.680 --> 0:24:50.960
<v Speaker 3>week companies are better at adopting and using AI. There's

0:24:51.000 --> 0:24:53.719
<v Speaker 3>some survey evidence that suggests that might be true, and

0:24:53.760 --> 0:24:56.160
<v Speaker 3>we're we're going to be able to get some sort

0:24:56.160 --> 0:25:00.320
<v Speaker 3>of harder evidence about that. We now have companies all

0:25:00.359 --> 0:25:04.080
<v Speaker 3>around the world, hundreds of companies, tens of in the

0:25:04.359 --> 0:25:07.360
<v Speaker 3>you know, more than ten thousand employees that we can

0:25:07.440 --> 0:25:09.840
<v Speaker 3>go back to and find out what they're doing now,

0:25:09.840 --> 0:25:14.200
<v Speaker 3>so that's pretty exciting. And I also do a lot

0:25:14.200 --> 0:25:18.679
<v Speaker 3>of research on climate change and the impacts of working

0:25:18.720 --> 0:25:22.840
<v Speaker 3>hours on climate change and how countries or places I've

0:25:22.880 --> 0:25:26.520
<v Speaker 3>done research across the US too, that have reduced their

0:25:26.560 --> 0:25:29.480
<v Speaker 3>working hours actually also reduced their carbon emissions. So I've

0:25:29.520 --> 0:25:31.720
<v Speaker 3>got some new papers coming up on that too.

0:25:31.840 --> 0:25:32.840
<v Speaker 1>I guess that would make sense.

0:25:32.880 --> 0:25:34.919
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you know, if you're not driving to and

0:25:34.960 --> 0:25:37.400
<v Speaker 2>from work on Friday, that's at least one less time.

0:25:37.440 --> 0:25:41.000
<v Speaker 2>And then probably the you know, electronic activity that's that's

0:25:41.040 --> 0:25:43.840
<v Speaker 2>going on with that, that too fascinating. Yeah, well, the

0:25:43.880 --> 0:25:47.639
<v Speaker 2>AI thing, I mean, you know, people, there was always

0:25:47.680 --> 0:25:50.560
<v Speaker 2>the probably the idea that technology would be able to

0:25:50.760 --> 0:25:54.760
<v Speaker 2>reduce hours without reducing you know, lifestyle and product because

0:25:54.760 --> 0:25:58.040
<v Speaker 2>of the productivity statistics would still be high. I mean,

0:25:58.119 --> 0:26:01.000
<v Speaker 2>just real quick. I mean, this is it told separate topic.

0:26:01.320 --> 0:26:03.480
<v Speaker 2>But you think that that might finally be the case

0:26:03.560 --> 0:26:04.600
<v Speaker 2>with AI.

0:26:05.240 --> 0:26:07.479
<v Speaker 3>Well, we don't know what's going to happen. I mean,

0:26:07.520 --> 0:26:09.520
<v Speaker 3>I have a chapter in the book on AI. The

0:26:09.560 --> 0:26:17.600
<v Speaker 3>first Industrial Revolution had tremendous productivity enhancing machinery and technology,

0:26:17.800 --> 0:26:20.240
<v Speaker 3>and it led to big increases in hours of work

0:26:21.359 --> 0:26:25.080
<v Speaker 3>and with AI. I just think we could go down

0:26:25.080 --> 0:26:27.640
<v Speaker 3>two paths. I mean, one is we could go down

0:26:27.680 --> 0:26:30.720
<v Speaker 3>a similar path in which what companies do is they

0:26:30.760 --> 0:26:34.199
<v Speaker 3>just lay off lots of workers and they buy that

0:26:34.320 --> 0:26:39.119
<v Speaker 3>AI and they use it more intensively, and the people

0:26:39.160 --> 0:26:42.840
<v Speaker 3>they have work more intensively, and that's it took a

0:26:42.880 --> 0:26:47.600
<v Speaker 3>long time to reverse that upward trend of hours from

0:26:47.600 --> 0:26:52.560
<v Speaker 3>the first Industrial revolution. That could happen with AI. The alternative,

0:26:52.600 --> 0:26:55.000
<v Speaker 3>and the one I argue obviously for in the book,

0:26:55.240 --> 0:26:59.720
<v Speaker 3>is we could actually use technology to reduce hours of

0:26:59.760 --> 0:27:03.480
<v Speaker 3>work and not not just lay people off, but actually

0:27:03.600 --> 0:27:08.720
<v Speaker 3>share out the work more equitably and reduce hours per job,

0:27:09.920 --> 0:27:12.960
<v Speaker 3>keep more and more, you know, people in work with

0:27:13.119 --> 0:27:19.480
<v Speaker 3>incomes and meaningful lives from that work. But we're gonna

0:27:19.520 --> 0:27:21.800
<v Speaker 3>have to that's gonna have to be a social choice

0:27:21.840 --> 0:27:25.520
<v Speaker 3>and not just something that where the companies just see

0:27:25.520 --> 0:27:27.920
<v Speaker 3>the incentive. We know, Microsoft just laid off a lot

0:27:27.960 --> 0:27:28.520
<v Speaker 3>of workers.

0:27:29.040 --> 0:27:30.919
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, so we'll see that's.

0:27:30.800 --> 0:27:32.679
<v Speaker 3>Going to be a really bad social outcome.

0:27:32.840 --> 0:27:35.199
<v Speaker 1>We will see how it plays out. Yeah, so we

0:27:35.280 --> 0:27:35.720
<v Speaker 1>do not know.

0:27:36.119 --> 0:27:38.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, Julia, thank you so much for joining us. Thank

0:27:38.600 --> 0:27:42.080
<v Speaker 2>you to everyone for listening. If you have feedback about

0:27:42.119 --> 0:27:44.879
<v Speaker 2>this or any other episode, you can always reach me

0:27:45.000 --> 0:27:48.040
<v Speaker 2>at Laura at Laura vandercam dot com. In the meantime,

0:27:48.160 --> 0:27:51.040
<v Speaker 2>this is Laura. Thanks for listening, and here's to making

0:27:51.080 --> 0:27:52.280
<v Speaker 2>the most of our time.

0:27:58.840 --> 0:28:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to Before or Breakfast. If you've got questions, ideas,

0:28:03.359 --> 0:28:06.800
<v Speaker 1>or feedback, you can reach me at Laura at Laura

0:28:06.920 --> 0:28:16.200
<v Speaker 1>vandercam dot com. Before Breakfast is a production of iHeartMedia.

0:28:16.880 --> 0:28:20.840
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts from iHeartMedia, please visit the iHeartRadio app,

0:28:21.119 --> 0:28:24.359
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.