WEBVTT - Sweet-Talking Percy [4]

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the MLK Tapes, a production of I Heart

0:00:03.560 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Radio and Tenderfoot TV. The views and opinions expressed in

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:10.479
<v Speaker 1>this podcast are solely those of the podcast author or

0:00:10.520 --> 0:00:14.200
<v Speaker 1>individuals participating in the podcast, and do not represent those

0:00:14.240 --> 0:00:18.640
<v Speaker 1>of I Heart Media, Tenderfoot TV, or their employees. Listener

0:00:18.680 --> 0:00:28.320
<v Speaker 1>discretion is advised. We had witness statements, outlines of arguments.

0:00:28.360 --> 0:00:32.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we had a complete ready file. He came

0:00:32.240 --> 0:00:35.680
<v Speaker 1>through Birmingham and we offered him that file. We offered

0:00:35.680 --> 0:00:38.520
<v Speaker 1>to sit down with him, We offered to outline our

0:00:38.640 --> 0:00:42.360
<v Speaker 1>defense with him, to give him the witness state, every

0:00:42.479 --> 0:00:46.120
<v Speaker 1>everything that we had. All he wanted to do, and

0:00:46.240 --> 0:00:51.400
<v Speaker 1>all we did was feeding steak and scotch whiskey at

0:00:51.440 --> 0:00:55.400
<v Speaker 1>the club in Birmingham and hear him ramble on about

0:00:55.440 --> 0:00:59.280
<v Speaker 1>what a fabulous lawyer he was. Truth of the matter is,

0:00:59.280 --> 0:01:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Percy Form was the biggest fraud and blow hard I

0:01:02.200 --> 0:01:06.760
<v Speaker 1>ever encountered in over fifty years of practicing law. I

0:01:06.800 --> 0:01:12.919
<v Speaker 1>saw absolutely no evidence, ever, either directly or second hand,

0:01:13.160 --> 0:01:17.840
<v Speaker 1>of any inclination or willingness on his part to defend

0:01:17.880 --> 0:01:24.360
<v Speaker 1>that case as it should have been defended. I called

0:01:24.600 --> 0:01:26.960
<v Speaker 1>the Union Hall. I said, it's a matter of life

0:01:26.959 --> 0:01:30.080
<v Speaker 1>and death. I said, I think these people of planning

0:01:30.120 --> 0:01:34.280
<v Speaker 1>to kill Dr King. The authorities were parade. Oh, we

0:01:34.360 --> 0:01:37.880
<v Speaker 1>found a gun that James L. Ray bought in Birmingham

0:01:37.880 --> 0:01:41.480
<v Speaker 1>that killed Dr King. Except it wasn't the gun that

0:01:41.560 --> 0:01:47.560
<v Speaker 1>killed Dr King. James Lvy was upon or the official

0:01:47.720 --> 0:01:52.600
<v Speaker 1>story from my Heart radio intended for TV. The plan

0:01:53.040 --> 0:01:57.320
<v Speaker 1>was to get King to the city because they wanted

0:01:57.320 --> 0:01:59.720
<v Speaker 1>it handled in Memphis for dead in them could hamon

0:02:00.400 --> 0:02:04.200
<v Speaker 1>and I've lived with us alone, monsieur, and they skied

0:02:04.360 --> 0:02:07.440
<v Speaker 1>for me. The Lord told me to not the word.

0:02:07.840 --> 0:02:10.440
<v Speaker 1>I've been wanting to tell it all my life. I'm

0:02:10.480 --> 0:02:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Bill Claybury and this is the MLK tapes, speaking from experience.

0:02:22.400 --> 0:02:25.200
<v Speaker 1>When one tries to open a conversation about who shot

0:02:25.280 --> 0:02:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Martin Luther King, if the person you're talking to knows

0:02:28.600 --> 0:02:31.679
<v Speaker 1>anything at all about the case, they immediately come back

0:02:31.760 --> 0:02:34.560
<v Speaker 1>with but the guy said he did it, And the

0:02:34.639 --> 0:02:38.079
<v Speaker 1>answer to that is a patient no he didn't. He

0:02:38.280 --> 0:02:41.839
<v Speaker 1>always denied it, but of course James Earl Ray did

0:02:42.000 --> 0:02:45.040
<v Speaker 1>in the end plead guilty. So how did that plea

0:02:45.160 --> 0:02:47.840
<v Speaker 1>come about? And what does it tell us about the murder?

0:02:49.120 --> 0:02:52.320
<v Speaker 1>As we heard in the last episode. Arthur Haynes Junior

0:02:52.400 --> 0:02:56.040
<v Speaker 1>and Senior were criminal defense attorneys who came to represent

0:02:56.240 --> 0:03:00.239
<v Speaker 1>James Earl Ray, the man accused of killing Martin Luther Kane.

0:03:00.960 --> 0:03:03.840
<v Speaker 1>Ray was an escaped con He had been in Memphis

0:03:03.960 --> 0:03:06.520
<v Speaker 1>that day and there did seem to be some connection

0:03:06.600 --> 0:03:10.240
<v Speaker 1>between him and the murderer, Dr. King. But despite all

0:03:10.320 --> 0:03:14.679
<v Speaker 1>the public posturing by the prosecution, Ray's attorneys were surprised

0:03:14.720 --> 0:03:17.240
<v Speaker 1>to find that the actual case against Ray was weak.

0:03:17.919 --> 0:03:20.360
<v Speaker 1>It seemed to them that the connection to the murder

0:03:20.760 --> 0:03:23.919
<v Speaker 1>was that their client had been set up. They investigated,

0:03:24.200 --> 0:03:27.280
<v Speaker 1>interviewed witnesses, and worked on the case for four months.

0:03:27.880 --> 0:03:30.760
<v Speaker 1>As the trial approached, they thought they had good chances

0:03:30.840 --> 0:03:34.560
<v Speaker 1>for an acquittal. Then the night before the trial was

0:03:34.639 --> 0:03:37.840
<v Speaker 1>to begin, they were handed a note that said they

0:03:37.920 --> 0:03:41.760
<v Speaker 1>had been removed from the case. Why did Foreman push

0:03:42.080 --> 0:03:44.720
<v Speaker 1>his way into the case? Did you ever wonder about that?

0:03:45.560 --> 0:03:48.720
<v Speaker 1>Did we ever wonder why and how Foreman got in

0:03:48.800 --> 0:03:52.360
<v Speaker 1>the case? Only every day from that day until the

0:03:52.480 --> 0:03:57.360
<v Speaker 1>day my father died. When I sat down with Ark

0:03:57.400 --> 0:04:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Haynes Jr. In Birmingham, he tried to explain how famous

0:04:01.040 --> 0:04:05.040
<v Speaker 1>criminal defense attorney Percy Foreman had pushed them aside, there

0:04:05.080 --> 0:04:07.800
<v Speaker 1>were pressure points. How to pay for the defense was

0:04:07.880 --> 0:04:11.160
<v Speaker 1>one of them. Ray had no money, and Haines father

0:04:11.280 --> 0:04:13.680
<v Speaker 1>and son could not afford to work for nothing and

0:04:13.960 --> 0:04:17.400
<v Speaker 1>pay all the costs of the defense. As well. Haines

0:04:17.480 --> 0:04:21.680
<v Speaker 1>knew a successful investigative writer named William Bradford Huey, who

0:04:21.760 --> 0:04:24.520
<v Speaker 1>was also from Alabama and who was interested in writing

0:04:24.520 --> 0:04:28.480
<v Speaker 1>about the King murder. Huey's books included The Americanization of Emily,

0:04:29.000 --> 0:04:32.479
<v Speaker 1>The Execution of Priva Slavik, and The Revolt of Mami Stover,

0:04:33.320 --> 0:04:36.440
<v Speaker 1>all of which were made into movies. He also wrote

0:04:36.480 --> 0:04:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Wolf Whistle, the story of the murder of the young

0:04:39.279 --> 0:04:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Emmett Till, and Three Live from Mississippi, which told of

0:04:43.279 --> 0:04:46.200
<v Speaker 1>the murders of the three civil rights workers in Nashoba County.

0:04:46.960 --> 0:04:50.200
<v Speaker 1>The forward to this book was written by Martin Luther King.

0:04:51.560 --> 0:04:53.719
<v Speaker 1>No one at the time knew what the real story

0:04:53.920 --> 0:04:56.960
<v Speaker 1>was with Ray and King, but Hughey sense there was

0:04:57.000 --> 0:04:59.880
<v Speaker 1>a book there and possibly a movie, and he was

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:03.400
<v Speaker 1>willing to put money up front to get access money

0:05:03.480 --> 0:05:05.919
<v Speaker 1>that was needed to fund the defense of James Earl

0:05:06.040 --> 0:05:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Ray two Art Haynes. It seemed like a promising offer

0:05:10.120 --> 0:05:14.200
<v Speaker 1>and he brought it to James William Bradford hue the

0:05:14.360 --> 0:05:18.560
<v Speaker 1>author who was writing for Look magazine, whom we had

0:05:18.680 --> 0:05:23.799
<v Speaker 1>encouraged Ray to hire. Because Hughie was was a noted

0:05:24.080 --> 0:05:27.960
<v Speaker 1>uh anti George Wallace, he was in the middle of

0:05:28.080 --> 0:05:33.120
<v Speaker 1>a series of articles for Esquire, he had every credential

0:05:33.640 --> 0:05:37.599
<v Speaker 1>being in DUCTR. King's camp, and he was from Alabama

0:05:37.600 --> 0:05:40.600
<v Speaker 1>and close to us, so we we encouraged him to

0:05:40.720 --> 0:05:45.080
<v Speaker 1>hire Hughie Haines Sr. Brought a deal to Ray where

0:05:45.320 --> 0:05:49.800
<v Speaker 1>in simple numbers, Ray would receive of whatever Huey's books

0:05:49.839 --> 0:05:55.600
<v Speaker 1>and articles brought in, Hughie would get and Haynes Judge

0:05:55.640 --> 0:05:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Preston Battle would not permit anyone besides his attorneys and

0:05:58.680 --> 0:06:00.920
<v Speaker 1>his immediate family to visit it or talked to Ray.

0:06:01.680 --> 0:06:04.520
<v Speaker 1>So the arrangement was made for Hughie to submit questions

0:06:04.560 --> 0:06:07.120
<v Speaker 1>to Ray and for Ray to write out his answers

0:06:07.160 --> 0:06:11.200
<v Speaker 1>in Longhand. All that summer I had carried questions from

0:06:11.320 --> 0:06:14.479
<v Speaker 1>Hughie to Ray and raise handwritten answers back to Hughie.

0:06:14.839 --> 0:06:19.080
<v Speaker 1>We had facilitated that all two hundred pages of Ray's

0:06:19.120 --> 0:06:22.360
<v Speaker 1>answers to Hughie's questions have been preserved and make for

0:06:22.440 --> 0:06:26.440
<v Speaker 1>an interesting read if you can decipher Ray's handwriting. It's

0:06:26.480 --> 0:06:29.799
<v Speaker 1>the same story Ray has told before of his prison

0:06:29.880 --> 0:06:32.200
<v Speaker 1>break and is moving about the country at the direction

0:06:32.279 --> 0:06:35.600
<v Speaker 1>of a man named Raoul. Hughie took these notes and

0:06:35.760 --> 0:06:39.120
<v Speaker 1>actually traced race travels and found the people Race that

0:06:39.200 --> 0:06:42.000
<v Speaker 1>he had worked for or met along the way. The

0:06:42.080 --> 0:06:46.400
<v Speaker 1>one exception was Raoul. This was not surprising because Ray

0:06:46.520 --> 0:06:50.400
<v Speaker 1>didn't know Raoul's last name, his address, or even if

0:06:50.520 --> 0:06:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Raoul was his real first name. Race spent a great

0:06:55.240 --> 0:06:57.480
<v Speaker 1>deal of time writing these pages, and at first he

0:06:57.600 --> 0:07:00.320
<v Speaker 1>was satisfied with how his attorneys were going about things,

0:07:01.160 --> 0:07:05.920
<v Speaker 1>but not everyone was. I suppose we were naive and

0:07:06.160 --> 0:07:09.280
<v Speaker 1>that we thought we were lawyers hired to defend a

0:07:09.360 --> 0:07:12.120
<v Speaker 1>murder case and that's what we were doing. There were

0:07:12.960 --> 0:07:17.920
<v Speaker 1>all kinds of reported witness hangers on and people involved

0:07:18.000 --> 0:07:20.760
<v Speaker 1>who wanted to be a part of it. Well. Jerry

0:07:20.840 --> 0:07:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Ray was one of those. He wanted to come to

0:07:23.440 --> 0:07:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Birmingham and have us support him and let him be

0:07:27.720 --> 0:07:31.520
<v Speaker 1>part of the defense. Truthfully, we didn't have time for that.

0:07:31.800 --> 0:07:34.600
<v Speaker 1>We were trying to manage our practice at the same

0:07:34.680 --> 0:07:38.080
<v Speaker 1>time get that case ready for trial, and we just

0:07:38.280 --> 0:07:42.000
<v Speaker 1>didn't have time or inclination to food Jerry Ray. We

0:07:42.120 --> 0:07:46.840
<v Speaker 1>were polite but not responsive to that. But Jerry Raid

0:07:46.920 --> 0:07:50.360
<v Speaker 1>did get himself involved. He visited James in prison, his

0:07:50.480 --> 0:07:54.560
<v Speaker 1>attorneys in Birmingham and author William Bradford, Huwey and Huntsville,

0:07:55.080 --> 0:07:57.320
<v Speaker 1>and he was also in touch with a certain attorney

0:07:57.360 --> 0:08:00.840
<v Speaker 1>in Texas who had soon arrived in Memphis. According to

0:08:00.920 --> 0:08:04.280
<v Speaker 1>everyone close to the case, James Earl Ray very much

0:08:04.360 --> 0:08:07.360
<v Speaker 1>wanted to go to trial. As Jerry Ray would say,

0:08:07.760 --> 0:08:10.600
<v Speaker 1>he didn't kill King, and he wanted his chance to

0:08:10.680 --> 0:08:17.480
<v Speaker 1>prove it in court. He need but this is where

0:08:17.520 --> 0:08:21.040
<v Speaker 1>the trouble started. James imagined a trial where he would

0:08:21.040 --> 0:08:24.640
<v Speaker 1>be able to tell his story, where he, James Earl Ray,

0:08:24.760 --> 0:08:26.800
<v Speaker 1>would be able to look the jurors in the eye

0:08:27.120 --> 0:08:29.720
<v Speaker 1>and have them believe that he did not shoot Martin

0:08:29.840 --> 0:08:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Luther King. But Arthur Haynes Senior was an experienced attorney

0:08:34.760 --> 0:08:37.520
<v Speaker 1>and he knew that great danger awaited a defendant when

0:08:37.559 --> 0:08:41.000
<v Speaker 1>he took the witness stand, especially if the defendant had,

0:08:41.440 --> 0:08:44.880
<v Speaker 1>like Ray, a long record of criminal conduct that the

0:08:45.000 --> 0:08:49.199
<v Speaker 1>prosecution could explore in great detail until less pretty much

0:08:49.200 --> 0:08:52.079
<v Speaker 1>all the jury would remember as they concluded that such

0:08:52.120 --> 0:08:55.440
<v Speaker 1>an outlaw should get what he deserved. So, as Arthur

0:08:55.520 --> 0:08:59.079
<v Speaker 1>Haynes explains, they were not ready to promise Ray that

0:08:59.160 --> 0:09:01.959
<v Speaker 1>he would take the stand. Our view of it was

0:09:02.240 --> 0:09:05.959
<v Speaker 1>that we wouldn't know whether Ray was gonna testify or

0:09:06.040 --> 0:09:11.680
<v Speaker 1>need to testify until the end of the state's case. Obviously,

0:09:11.800 --> 0:09:15.440
<v Speaker 1>if he had testified, that would have killed the value

0:09:15.640 --> 0:09:25.200
<v Speaker 1>of Hughey's connection to him. This is how Jerry Ray

0:09:25.280 --> 0:09:30.360
<v Speaker 1>saw it. On Whomber firston making is sistime, I blew

0:09:30.440 --> 0:09:32.839
<v Speaker 1>out in the heart build Alabama and talked to you,

0:09:33.000 --> 0:09:36.120
<v Speaker 1>you take my way down because he want another contact

0:09:36.240 --> 0:09:41.959
<v Speaker 1>beside the journey. So he was showing these contracts and

0:09:42.120 --> 0:09:45.480
<v Speaker 1>so I told he hope. He said only again, and

0:09:45.520 --> 0:09:47.440
<v Speaker 1>now you go back and tell James. He's not about

0:09:47.679 --> 0:09:52.240
<v Speaker 1>to understand. He doesn't go. So I went back and

0:09:52.320 --> 0:09:54.400
<v Speaker 1>told James you on the phone hand because when he's

0:09:54.480 --> 0:09:58.240
<v Speaker 1>running stas So with a little help from brother Jerry,

0:09:58.800 --> 0:10:01.120
<v Speaker 1>James began to fear that the case was not being

0:10:01.160 --> 0:10:04.720
<v Speaker 1>pursued with his best interests in mind. He wanted to testify,

0:10:05.080 --> 0:10:07.280
<v Speaker 1>and it seemed that Huey and his book was now

0:10:07.360 --> 0:10:10.920
<v Speaker 1>standing in the way. And then the weekend before his

0:10:11.080 --> 0:10:13.800
<v Speaker 1>trial was to begin, he received a visit from a

0:10:13.880 --> 0:10:18.400
<v Speaker 1>famous Texas lawyer named Percy Foreman. Foreman was six foot

0:10:18.480 --> 0:10:21.360
<v Speaker 1>four and weighed two hundred and fifty pounds, and had

0:10:21.400 --> 0:10:24.200
<v Speaker 1>a huge reputation to go with it. He had grown

0:10:24.280 --> 0:10:27.360
<v Speaker 1>up poor in the wiles of East Texas, quit school

0:10:27.440 --> 0:10:30.360
<v Speaker 1>when he was fifteen, and made something of himself because

0:10:30.400 --> 0:10:32.959
<v Speaker 1>he had an agile mind and a quick tongue. He

0:10:33.040 --> 0:10:35.680
<v Speaker 1>put himself through law school and came out ready for bear.

0:10:36.720 --> 0:10:38.360
<v Speaker 1>He had a knack for talking in a way that

0:10:38.520 --> 0:10:42.040
<v Speaker 1>juries liked, and he was especially good at representing people

0:10:42.160 --> 0:10:45.560
<v Speaker 1>accused of murder. In his forty years a criminal law

0:10:45.760 --> 0:10:49.199
<v Speaker 1>he claimed to have represented over one thousand of those.

0:10:49.320 --> 0:10:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Only one, as the story goes, was ever executed, and

0:10:52.840 --> 0:10:56.480
<v Speaker 1>according to Foreman, only sixty six of the thousand spent

0:10:56.559 --> 0:11:00.280
<v Speaker 1>even a day in jail. The more obviously guilty, the

0:11:00.440 --> 0:11:02.800
<v Speaker 1>easier it seemed for him to get them off for

0:11:02.920 --> 0:11:06.440
<v Speaker 1>a price. He was hated by the prosecutors he faced,

0:11:06.760 --> 0:11:09.640
<v Speaker 1>and also hated by his clients when they felt the

0:11:09.720 --> 0:11:12.120
<v Speaker 1>most vulnerable, as when he could have them sign over

0:11:12.240 --> 0:11:15.679
<v Speaker 1>every asset they had. I don't represent wealthy clients, he

0:11:15.760 --> 0:11:18.040
<v Speaker 1>once said, if they aren't poor when they come to me,

0:11:18.600 --> 0:11:21.880
<v Speaker 1>they are when they leave. Foreman had been talking to

0:11:22.000 --> 0:11:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Jerry Ray, so he knew all the right buttons to push.

0:11:25.280 --> 0:11:27.280
<v Speaker 1>He told James that Haynes should not have made a

0:11:27.360 --> 0:11:30.080
<v Speaker 1>deal like that with Hughie. Who is Hughie to give

0:11:30.080 --> 0:11:32.480
<v Speaker 1>advice to his attorney based on what might or might

0:11:32.520 --> 0:11:35.600
<v Speaker 1>not be good for a book. Foreman talked about all

0:11:35.640 --> 0:11:38.240
<v Speaker 1>the famous people he knew in all the cases he

0:11:38.320 --> 0:11:41.000
<v Speaker 1>had won, and how James's case would be the easiest

0:11:41.040 --> 0:11:44.400
<v Speaker 1>one he ever argued, and added to that, Foreman said

0:11:44.480 --> 0:11:48.520
<v Speaker 1>that unlike the Haines defense team, he was wealthy, wealthy

0:11:48.640 --> 0:11:51.680
<v Speaker 1>enough to move forward without any literary contracts, and they'd

0:11:51.679 --> 0:11:53.720
<v Speaker 1>figure out how to pay his fee after the trial.

0:11:54.480 --> 0:11:57.160
<v Speaker 1>But for a retainer, he had James sign over the

0:11:57.240 --> 0:12:00.679
<v Speaker 1>title to his Mustang and the Remington thirty six that

0:12:00.800 --> 0:12:03.760
<v Speaker 1>he purchased in Birmingham, the one that was said to

0:12:03.840 --> 0:12:09.120
<v Speaker 1>have killed King. Here's Ray for King jail the same made.

0:12:09.679 --> 0:12:12.520
<v Speaker 1>He told me that if I would just miss things

0:12:12.559 --> 0:12:15.920
<v Speaker 1>and are him, he wouldn't get involved in literary contrast,

0:12:16.240 --> 0:12:21.280
<v Speaker 1>he financed trow trows over and he would get used

0:12:21.280 --> 0:12:26.040
<v Speaker 1>to be then, so I agreed, and I signed some

0:12:26.240 --> 0:12:29.760
<v Speaker 1>time and paper decade just missing Haynes and all right

0:12:29.880 --> 0:12:32.920
<v Speaker 1>him well. On one of the national herring for the

0:12:33.000 --> 0:12:38.119
<v Speaker 1>trial work, Foreman promised Batting would get involved any litter contracts.

0:12:38.679 --> 0:12:40.760
<v Speaker 1>At that time, I didn't know he was negotiating with

0:12:40.840 --> 0:12:44.920
<v Speaker 1>Hie to think for Hayes interesting to contract and said

0:12:44.960 --> 0:12:48.840
<v Speaker 1>that at that time so Foreman's big promise to Ray

0:12:49.240 --> 0:12:51.920
<v Speaker 1>was the case would not be driven by literary contracts,

0:12:52.200 --> 0:12:55.319
<v Speaker 1>that he Foreman was rich enough to defend Ray without them.

0:12:56.160 --> 0:12:58.320
<v Speaker 1>But a week after he had taken over the case,

0:12:59.000 --> 0:13:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Foreman and Huie for Luncheon dallas Key described that meeting

0:13:03.040 --> 0:13:07.200
<v Speaker 1>in his book he slew the dreamer quote Mr Foreman,

0:13:07.320 --> 0:13:10.160
<v Speaker 1>like my three way contract. All he wanted was for

0:13:10.320 --> 0:13:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Mr Haynes to get out of the way so he

0:13:12.440 --> 0:13:15.360
<v Speaker 1>could have what Mr Haynes had. So you get Haynes

0:13:15.400 --> 0:13:17.439
<v Speaker 1>out of the way, he said, and then god damn it,

0:13:17.520 --> 0:13:19.360
<v Speaker 1>get to work and write us a good book, make

0:13:19.440 --> 0:13:22.199
<v Speaker 1>us a good movie, and make us some money. I

0:13:22.240 --> 0:13:25.360
<v Speaker 1>didn't think him myself. And then subsequently, in January of

0:13:25.480 --> 0:13:30.600
<v Speaker 1>nineteen six nine, he came up there with a literary contract.

0:13:31.600 --> 0:13:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Yes idea, and I signed in fair Way third. Yes,

0:13:37.760 --> 0:13:41.880
<v Speaker 1>signed a literary contracts A thing I got to go

0:13:42.040 --> 0:13:47.959
<v Speaker 1>to him. The contracts that Foreman had Ray signed on

0:13:48.120 --> 0:13:53.000
<v Speaker 1>January nine and February three essentially stripped Ray of every

0:13:53.120 --> 0:13:57.160
<v Speaker 1>remaining asset he had or might have. So why did

0:13:57.280 --> 0:14:01.400
<v Speaker 1>he sign them? As Ray would explain later, Foreman had

0:14:01.440 --> 0:14:04.120
<v Speaker 1>come to see him in late January saying the case

0:14:04.240 --> 0:14:06.679
<v Speaker 1>was going very well, but he needed to bring in

0:14:06.760 --> 0:14:09.920
<v Speaker 1>another attorney, John J. Hooker, and that was going to

0:14:10.040 --> 0:14:14.720
<v Speaker 1>cost money. So Ray, not really having a choice, signed

0:14:14.760 --> 0:14:18.360
<v Speaker 1>everything over to Foreman. Now, a Foreman had been telling

0:14:18.400 --> 0:14:20.880
<v Speaker 1>the truth about representing from the start that a plea

0:14:20.960 --> 0:14:23.800
<v Speaker 1>bargain was their only option, there would have been no

0:14:23.960 --> 0:14:27.440
<v Speaker 1>reason for Ray to enter into these contracts. So as

0:14:27.520 --> 0:14:31.000
<v Speaker 1>late as February three, Foreman was saying that they were

0:14:31.080 --> 0:14:34.640
<v Speaker 1>going to trial and things were looking good. But just

0:14:34.840 --> 0:14:38.440
<v Speaker 1>ten days later, after Foreman had plucked his client clean,

0:14:38.960 --> 0:14:42.400
<v Speaker 1>as Bradford Huey would describe it, Foreman came back with

0:14:42.560 --> 0:15:05.040
<v Speaker 1>bad news where he had to plead guilty. Now, I

0:15:05.120 --> 0:15:10.120
<v Speaker 1>want to think we're thirteen. He came into prisiness Jerman

0:15:10.240 --> 0:15:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Heart Danton, and he uh suggested a human playing, he says,

0:15:15.840 --> 0:15:19.680
<v Speaker 1>and there's me and don't in thankfully and well anyway,

0:15:20.520 --> 0:15:22.040
<v Speaker 1>when he came back to see me next time, he

0:15:22.200 --> 0:15:26.680
<v Speaker 1>was talking about he said they might prosecute my brother

0:15:26.840 --> 0:15:30.680
<v Speaker 1>Jerry rag and expiracing words and also he said they

0:15:30.720 --> 0:15:35.040
<v Speaker 1>might be pressed my father James brother Jerry tells the

0:15:35.120 --> 0:15:39.400
<v Speaker 1>same story a forman's about face and the first before

0:15:39.480 --> 0:15:42.320
<v Speaker 1>we gave it said it's little busy because he's I

0:15:42.480 --> 0:15:44.440
<v Speaker 1>read a lot, I erst whoever they are followed it

0:15:45.320 --> 0:15:49.280
<v Speaker 1>and he did that up until uh a month before

0:15:49.360 --> 0:15:52.200
<v Speaker 1>the Guildy plays that he started cries that they're gonna

0:15:52.200 --> 0:15:54.800
<v Speaker 1>acute and they're going to do this, but so Jade

0:15:54.880 --> 0:16:00.040
<v Speaker 1>fans to read me paiously little problem nyway and it

0:16:00.120 --> 0:16:05.280
<v Speaker 1>would resigned. At this point, James Earl Ray was boxed in.

0:16:06.160 --> 0:16:09.240
<v Speaker 1>He was stuck with Foreman, and Foreman refused to perform.

0:16:09.920 --> 0:16:12.360
<v Speaker 1>He kept telling Ray that the prosecution wanted to turn

0:16:12.440 --> 0:16:16.440
<v Speaker 1>him into barbecue form his word. Then he told Ray

0:16:16.640 --> 0:16:18.960
<v Speaker 1>that if he insisted on going to trial, they would

0:16:19.000 --> 0:16:22.360
<v Speaker 1>put his father and brother in jail. When Ray said

0:16:22.400 --> 0:16:25.240
<v Speaker 1>he still wanted to trial, Foreman said flat out that

0:16:25.280 --> 0:16:27.840
<v Speaker 1>he wouldn't defend him. He didn't feel up to it.

0:16:28.920 --> 0:16:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Here is an interchange between Bill Pepper and Jerry Ray

0:16:32.520 --> 0:16:36.880
<v Speaker 1>at the nine civil trial, not invisibly. He told me

0:16:37.040 --> 0:16:39.280
<v Speaker 1>to the last my sier he still had made up

0:16:39.280 --> 0:16:43.080
<v Speaker 1>the money he's still to fight doing for and he

0:16:43.520 --> 0:16:47.000
<v Speaker 1>he told he told me that foreman told him if

0:16:47.040 --> 0:16:51.840
<v Speaker 1>he did both of my hand and my John Earl

0:16:51.920 --> 0:16:54.560
<v Speaker 1>back in the twenties, and is both charged me being

0:16:54.680 --> 0:17:00.600
<v Speaker 1>the assessed of the word, I'm pretty sure you left, Jerry.

0:17:00.680 --> 0:17:05.720
<v Speaker 1>That's certainly the James little Ray Black versus Forman got

0:17:05.800 --> 0:17:09.040
<v Speaker 1>all about. This is the day of a letter Archer

0:17:09.119 --> 0:17:14.760
<v Speaker 1>that m March Watson Arch nine, nineteen fifty and when

0:17:14.960 --> 0:17:19.200
<v Speaker 1>is it going to be played here? Uh? Right, right right?

0:17:19.200 --> 0:17:23.920
<v Speaker 1>I was right, was March following that this is a

0:17:24.040 --> 0:17:28.440
<v Speaker 1>letter from his council on the eve of trop and

0:17:28.560 --> 0:17:31.520
<v Speaker 1>this letter offers you offers hand five hundred dollars. What

0:17:31.760 --> 0:17:35.399
<v Speaker 1>conditions was the over five hundred dollars we have abdybe

0:17:35.480 --> 0:17:38.560
<v Speaker 1>played to the lea built embarrassment in coort and it

0:17:38.760 --> 0:17:41.359
<v Speaker 1>was agreed with We understand that five hundred dollars was

0:17:41.359 --> 0:17:43.800
<v Speaker 1>to be taking the higher a new lawyer and her

0:17:43.880 --> 0:17:48.600
<v Speaker 1>decided a sad Yet this agreement signed the day before

0:17:48.720 --> 0:17:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Ray entered his guilty plea as a strange document. Foreman

0:17:52.560 --> 0:17:54.879
<v Speaker 1>signs on for a fee of a hundred and sixty

0:17:54.960 --> 0:17:58.760
<v Speaker 1>five thousand dollars if such is produced by books for movies,

0:17:59.440 --> 0:18:03.119
<v Speaker 1>and Ray is handed five dollars. The purpose of the

0:18:03.200 --> 0:18:05.920
<v Speaker 1>five hundred is not stated in the contract, but according

0:18:05.960 --> 0:18:08.600
<v Speaker 1>to both James and Jerry, it was so Ray could

0:18:08.600 --> 0:18:11.840
<v Speaker 1>go find a lawyer to overturn the plea, as if

0:18:11.880 --> 0:18:15.920
<v Speaker 1>five dollars could accomplish such a thing. But Ray is

0:18:16.000 --> 0:18:19.119
<v Speaker 1>to get the five hundred only if he meets to conditions.

0:18:19.920 --> 0:18:21.800
<v Speaker 1>He enters a plea of guilty of murder in the

0:18:21.880 --> 0:18:24.600
<v Speaker 1>first degree, and he doesn't make a scene of any

0:18:24.680 --> 0:18:28.800
<v Speaker 1>kind at the proceeding. And that's what unfolds. Are you

0:18:29.000 --> 0:18:32.119
<v Speaker 1>leading murder in the place degree in this case because

0:18:32.200 --> 0:18:35.919
<v Speaker 1>you killed Dr Martin lives the king under sex secumstances,

0:18:36.080 --> 0:18:39.400
<v Speaker 1>it would make you legally guilty. But in the place

0:18:39.480 --> 0:18:42.520
<v Speaker 1>degree under the law is explained to you by your lawyer.

0:18:43.280 --> 0:18:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Ray's answer was barely audible on the recording system used

0:18:46.200 --> 0:18:50.119
<v Speaker 1>by the court. What he said was quote yes, legally guilty.

0:18:51.720 --> 0:18:55.360
<v Speaker 1>According to attorney Mark Lane, who would later represent Ray,

0:18:56.160 --> 0:18:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Ray told him that when Foreman was using every kind

0:18:59.200 --> 0:19:02.080
<v Speaker 1>of argument to put him into a plea. Ray blurted

0:19:02.119 --> 0:19:04.040
<v Speaker 1>out that he didn't want to plead guilty because he

0:19:04.119 --> 0:19:08.520
<v Speaker 1>hadn't shot king. Doesn't matter, replied Foreman. If you were

0:19:08.600 --> 0:19:11.920
<v Speaker 1>involved in any kind of illegal activity with those who did,

0:19:12.440 --> 0:19:15.159
<v Speaker 1>you are legally guilty. You are as guilty as the

0:19:15.240 --> 0:19:18.879
<v Speaker 1>man who pulled the trigger. Foreman was referring to the

0:19:18.960 --> 0:19:23.080
<v Speaker 1>concept of felony murder, where if three people say agree

0:19:23.119 --> 0:19:25.520
<v Speaker 1>to rob a store, and they all agree that no

0:19:25.600 --> 0:19:28.440
<v Speaker 1>one is to be heard, but something goes wrong and

0:19:28.600 --> 0:19:30.760
<v Speaker 1>one man pulls a gun and kills the store clerk,

0:19:31.440 --> 0:19:35.240
<v Speaker 1>all three men are legally guilty of the murder. Most

0:19:35.320 --> 0:19:38.240
<v Speaker 1>states have such laws, though it is far from clear

0:19:38.520 --> 0:19:41.040
<v Speaker 1>that such a concept would apply in a case where

0:19:41.080 --> 0:19:44.160
<v Speaker 1>one man is purposely deceived about the crime and brought

0:19:44.240 --> 0:19:47.320
<v Speaker 1>along only for the purpose of taking the blame. But

0:19:47.480 --> 0:19:50.919
<v Speaker 1>Foreman's little lesson was most likely how the phrase legally

0:19:50.960 --> 0:19:56.080
<v Speaker 1>guilty became part of raise plea. After the plea was entered,

0:19:56.400 --> 0:20:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Ray's attorney, Percy Foreman, was invited to speak. He stood

0:20:00.359 --> 0:20:03.040
<v Speaker 1>up and addressed the court. This is what he had

0:20:03.119 --> 0:20:06.920
<v Speaker 1>to say. It's an honor to appear in this court.

0:20:07.520 --> 0:20:10.120
<v Speaker 1>I never expected or had any idea when I entered

0:20:10.160 --> 0:20:12.639
<v Speaker 1>this case that I would be able to accomplish anything

0:20:13.119 --> 0:20:16.960
<v Speaker 1>except perhaps save the defendant's life. All of us, all

0:20:17.000 --> 0:20:19.520
<v Speaker 1>of you, were as well informed as I was about

0:20:19.560 --> 0:20:21.840
<v Speaker 1>the facts of this case, due to the fact that

0:20:21.920 --> 0:20:24.960
<v Speaker 1>we have such an effective news media. Took me a

0:20:25.080 --> 0:20:27.600
<v Speaker 1>month that convinced myself of that which the Attorney General

0:20:27.800 --> 0:20:30.920
<v Speaker 1>of the United States and Jed Grohover of the FBI

0:20:31.200 --> 0:20:36.680
<v Speaker 1>announced last July that there was no conspiracy. After that

0:20:36.760 --> 0:20:40.560
<v Speaker 1>bit of self congratulations from Percy Foreman, Ray asked Judge

0:20:40.600 --> 0:20:43.760
<v Speaker 1>Battle if he might say something. The judge agreed, and

0:20:43.840 --> 0:20:48.400
<v Speaker 1>I'll read a slightly edited version of what followed Ray.

0:20:49.400 --> 0:20:51.359
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to change anything that I have said.

0:20:51.880 --> 0:20:54.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to add anything onto it either. The

0:20:54.400 --> 0:20:56.960
<v Speaker 1>only thing I have to say is I don't exactly

0:20:57.000 --> 0:21:00.119
<v Speaker 1>accept the theories of Mr Clark. In other words, I'm

0:21:00.160 --> 0:21:03.639
<v Speaker 1>not bound to accept the theories of Mr Clark. This

0:21:03.840 --> 0:21:07.080
<v Speaker 1>is an aside. But Percy Foreman, who had just referred

0:21:07.080 --> 0:21:10.159
<v Speaker 1>to Attorney General of the United States, doesn't know who

0:21:10.359 --> 0:21:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Ray is speaking about, so he asked, who is Mr Clark?

0:21:15.400 --> 0:21:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Ray Ramsey Clark Foreman Oh Ray and Mr Hoover Foreman

0:21:23.920 --> 0:21:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Mr who Ray, Mr j Edgar Hoover. I'm not trying

0:21:28.680 --> 0:21:31.119
<v Speaker 1>to change anything. I just want to add something onto it.

0:21:31.960 --> 0:21:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Judge Battle, you don't agree with those theories, Ray, I

0:21:36.400 --> 0:21:39.600
<v Speaker 1>mean on the conspiracy thing. There is a bit of

0:21:39.640 --> 0:21:42.600
<v Speaker 1>cross talk, and no one seems inclined to ask Ray

0:21:42.960 --> 0:21:45.920
<v Speaker 1>what it is he's trying to say. Judge Battle then

0:21:46.040 --> 0:21:49.440
<v Speaker 1>asks if he is still pleading guilty to first degree murder,

0:21:49.920 --> 0:21:52.600
<v Speaker 1>and Ray says that he is. It was a short,

0:21:52.720 --> 0:21:55.920
<v Speaker 1>tense moment. Ray had gone off script, but he hadn't

0:21:55.960 --> 0:21:58.320
<v Speaker 1>cost a huge scene, so he would still get his

0:21:58.400 --> 0:22:03.639
<v Speaker 1>five dollars. Three days after recording his guilty plea, James

0:22:03.720 --> 0:22:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Earl Ray wrote to Judge Preston Battle and asked to

0:22:06.640 --> 0:22:09.520
<v Speaker 1>have the plea overturned and allow him to go to trial.

0:22:10.240 --> 0:22:12.680
<v Speaker 1>A few days later, he wrote again asking for the

0:22:12.720 --> 0:22:16.080
<v Speaker 1>same thing. It was not clear how Judge Battle was

0:22:16.119 --> 0:22:19.560
<v Speaker 1>going to rule on raised petitions. Often, in the interests

0:22:19.600 --> 0:22:23.680
<v Speaker 1>of justice, such petitions are granted. But before Battle could

0:22:23.680 --> 0:22:26.600
<v Speaker 1>make a decision, he was found slumped over his desk,

0:22:27.040 --> 0:22:30.840
<v Speaker 1>dead from an apparent heart attack, and according to various accounts,

0:22:31.119 --> 0:22:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Battle was slumped over raised petitions on which he was

0:22:34.280 --> 0:22:37.760
<v Speaker 1>to rule. A new judge replaced Battle, and he didn't

0:22:37.800 --> 0:22:40.800
<v Speaker 1>allow Ray to reopen the case. So Ray was led

0:22:40.840 --> 0:22:45.639
<v Speaker 1>off to prison no trial. But Percy Foreman's statement at

0:22:45.720 --> 0:22:49.040
<v Speaker 1>the end of the trial is curious. If Foreman was

0:22:49.160 --> 0:22:52.880
<v Speaker 1>so certain that Ray had to plead guilty, why did

0:22:52.920 --> 0:22:56.080
<v Speaker 1>he connive to get himself into the case, And what

0:22:56.320 --> 0:22:59.000
<v Speaker 1>was all this talk about the easiest case I've ever argued?

0:23:00.920 --> 0:23:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Did you ever feel that you could ever do more

0:23:03.280 --> 0:23:05.680
<v Speaker 1>than save his life? Never had any time, and so

0:23:05.920 --> 0:23:08.720
<v Speaker 1>told him from the day I came here, and he

0:23:08.880 --> 0:23:11.840
<v Speaker 1>never expected anything else from the first and I never

0:23:11.960 --> 0:23:17.080
<v Speaker 1>expected to accomplish this. This statement by Percy Foreman, made

0:23:17.119 --> 0:23:20.080
<v Speaker 1>out on the street after race so called trial, is

0:23:20.160 --> 0:23:24.160
<v Speaker 1>most certainly a lie, and a big one. Foreman says

0:23:24.240 --> 0:23:26.600
<v Speaker 1>here that he told Ray on the first day that

0:23:26.680 --> 0:23:29.560
<v Speaker 1>they met, that his only hope was to plead guilty

0:23:29.640 --> 0:23:32.760
<v Speaker 1>and take a life sentence. But if that were true,

0:23:33.520 --> 0:23:37.240
<v Speaker 1>why would Ray need to change lawyers. Haines father and

0:23:37.359 --> 0:23:40.960
<v Speaker 1>son already possessed a plea offer from the prosecution, as

0:23:41.080 --> 0:23:44.639
<v Speaker 1>art Hands revealed to me when we spoke, we ever

0:23:44.800 --> 0:23:47.680
<v Speaker 1>offered a plea bargain. Oh, absolutely, we were offered a

0:23:47.760 --> 0:23:50.200
<v Speaker 1>better deal that he took. I think there was a

0:23:50.320 --> 0:23:53.680
<v Speaker 1>little anxiety on the part of the prosecution is to

0:23:53.800 --> 0:23:58.080
<v Speaker 1>the strength of the case. Haines said that the deal

0:23:58.160 --> 0:24:00.520
<v Speaker 1>they had been offered was better than the one Ray

0:24:00.640 --> 0:24:03.240
<v Speaker 1>finally had to settle for. But it was better only

0:24:03.400 --> 0:24:05.880
<v Speaker 1>in that it allowed him an earlier date from which

0:24:05.920 --> 0:24:09.240
<v Speaker 1>he would be eligible for parole. Not much of a difference,

0:24:09.280 --> 0:24:11.920
<v Speaker 1>because no one was going to let the convicted murderer

0:24:12.000 --> 0:24:15.359
<v Speaker 1>of Martin Luther King out on parole. But if Ray

0:24:15.440 --> 0:24:17.920
<v Speaker 1>wished to take a guilty plea in exchange for life

0:24:18.000 --> 0:24:21.440
<v Speaker 1>in prison, he already had that. He didn't need the

0:24:21.480 --> 0:24:25.600
<v Speaker 1>services of some fancy outside lawyer. But Ray wasn't thinking

0:24:25.680 --> 0:24:28.879
<v Speaker 1>plea bargain. He was thinking trial, and he went with

0:24:29.040 --> 0:24:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Foreman because Foreman says his would be an easy case

0:24:32.359 --> 0:24:36.399
<v Speaker 1>to win. So why was Foreman now saying that he

0:24:36.440 --> 0:24:39.040
<v Speaker 1>had always told Ray that his only chance was to

0:24:39.119 --> 0:24:42.960
<v Speaker 1>plead guilty. Some insights into this are provided by the

0:24:43.040 --> 0:24:47.080
<v Speaker 1>House Select Committee on Assassinations, which published a deposition of

0:24:47.200 --> 0:24:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Foreman pursuant to a lawsuit brought by Ray concerning the

0:24:51.560 --> 0:24:57.159
<v Speaker 1>representation he received attorney James Lassar asked Foreman exactly what

0:24:57.320 --> 0:25:00.119
<v Speaker 1>he had done on behalf of his client. Did he

0:25:00.240 --> 0:25:04.040
<v Speaker 1>hire an investigator? Foreman said he hadn't. Then how did

0:25:04.119 --> 0:25:07.560
<v Speaker 1>he investigate the case? Foreman fumbled about and then said

0:25:07.600 --> 0:25:10.400
<v Speaker 1>he hired six or eight Memphis Law School students who

0:25:10.440 --> 0:25:12.680
<v Speaker 1>worked for him. What did he ask them to do?

0:25:13.480 --> 0:25:17.159
<v Speaker 1>Foreman couldn't quite remember now? What were their names? He

0:25:17.240 --> 0:25:20.280
<v Speaker 1>couldn't remember that either. Well, surely their names could be

0:25:20.320 --> 0:25:22.879
<v Speaker 1>found on their pace ups. Foreman said they had been

0:25:22.920 --> 0:25:26.159
<v Speaker 1>paid in cash. Well, where would their work product be

0:25:27.000 --> 0:25:30.479
<v Speaker 1>Foreman didn't know, but he probably had it somewhere. Foreman

0:25:30.560 --> 0:25:33.640
<v Speaker 1>then said he owned eighty vacant houses which were all

0:25:33.800 --> 0:25:36.720
<v Speaker 1>filled with his case records, but he kept no list

0:25:36.800 --> 0:25:40.760
<v Speaker 1>of what was where. Foreman did say he interviewed some witnesses,

0:25:40.960 --> 0:25:42.760
<v Speaker 1>but he couldn't say where the records of this might

0:25:42.840 --> 0:25:46.800
<v Speaker 1>be found. And so it went. But from these questions

0:25:46.840 --> 0:25:50.879
<v Speaker 1>and answers, it became apparent that Percy Foreman had nothing

0:25:50.960 --> 0:25:53.840
<v Speaker 1>to show that he had done any work on behalf

0:25:53.880 --> 0:25:59.679
<v Speaker 1>of his client, James Earl Ray. When Percy Foreman appeared

0:25:59.720 --> 0:26:02.560
<v Speaker 1>before the House Select Committee, he was asked if he

0:26:02.640 --> 0:26:06.960
<v Speaker 1>had ever compared notes with Ray's previous attorneys. Did you

0:26:07.440 --> 0:26:10.640
<v Speaker 1>ever consult with Mr Haynes, who had also reviewed the evidence,

0:26:10.720 --> 0:26:13.199
<v Speaker 1>to see whether he agreed with you? Did you ever

0:26:13.320 --> 0:26:19.480
<v Speaker 1>consult with with Arthur Haynes? Well? I went to Birmingham

0:26:20.800 --> 0:26:27.280
<v Speaker 1>from Atlanta in November within a week, at ten days

0:26:27.440 --> 0:26:34.520
<v Speaker 1>of accepting the case, and Mr Haynes, his wife and

0:26:35.200 --> 0:26:38.080
<v Speaker 1>brother in law and his wife took me to a club.

0:26:38.200 --> 0:26:42.119
<v Speaker 1>We spent the evening together and we talked as to

0:26:42.240 --> 0:26:49.280
<v Speaker 1>what we said. I don't temporary recall, but I had

0:26:49.359 --> 0:26:55.600
<v Speaker 1>difficulty getting the any information from Mr Haynes. I had

0:26:55.680 --> 0:27:01.040
<v Speaker 1>to have him sighted for contempted battle to get whatever

0:27:01.160 --> 0:27:05.000
<v Speaker 1>I did get. Foreman was so full of the larky.

0:27:05.960 --> 0:27:09.399
<v Speaker 1>This is Art Hanes Jr. Reacting to Foreman's charge that

0:27:09.600 --> 0:27:12.920
<v Speaker 1>he and his father withheld their files from Foreman. It

0:27:12.960 --> 0:27:15.480
<v Speaker 1>should be remembered that Foreman pushed his way into this

0:27:15.640 --> 0:27:19.200
<v Speaker 1>case and was the reason Haynes was dismissed. But the

0:27:19.320 --> 0:27:22.600
<v Speaker 1>four month work product of Haines father and son did

0:27:22.680 --> 0:27:25.960
<v Speaker 1>not suddenly belong to Foreman because Ray was now his client.

0:27:26.960 --> 0:27:30.399
<v Speaker 1>Even so, according to Art Haynes Jr. They were willing

0:27:30.520 --> 0:27:33.720
<v Speaker 1>to share the work they had done. He came through

0:27:33.840 --> 0:27:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Birmingham and we offered him that file. We offered to

0:27:37.119 --> 0:27:40.800
<v Speaker 1>sit down with him, We offered to outline our defense

0:27:41.160 --> 0:27:44.760
<v Speaker 1>with him. All he wanted to do, and all we

0:27:45.040 --> 0:27:50.440
<v Speaker 1>did was feeding steak and Scotch whiskey at the club

0:27:50.520 --> 0:27:54.840
<v Speaker 1>in Birmingham and hearing him rambalong about what a fabulous

0:27:55.280 --> 0:28:01.680
<v Speaker 1>lawyer he was. I saw absolutely no evidence, ever, either

0:28:01.880 --> 0:28:07.000
<v Speaker 1>directly or second hand, of any inclination or willingness on

0:28:07.200 --> 0:28:09.920
<v Speaker 1>his part to defend that case as it should have

0:28:09.960 --> 0:28:14.800
<v Speaker 1>been defended. Attorney Mark Lane, who represented James Earl Ray

0:28:14.920 --> 0:28:18.200
<v Speaker 1>in the late nineteen seventies, sought out Arthur Haynes Sr.

0:28:18.560 --> 0:28:21.879
<v Speaker 1>And was generously given access to his files, as Foreman

0:28:21.920 --> 0:28:25.199
<v Speaker 1>would have been had he had the interest. While they

0:28:25.280 --> 0:28:28.479
<v Speaker 1>were meeting, Lane asked Haynes what he thought of Foreman,

0:28:29.040 --> 0:28:32.640
<v Speaker 1>especially after their meeting at the club in Birmingham. Mr

0:28:32.760 --> 0:28:37.280
<v Speaker 1>Haynes replied, my judgment is that the man never considered

0:28:37.480 --> 0:28:41.120
<v Speaker 1>trying the case. As far as I can ascertain, he

0:28:41.320 --> 0:28:45.920
<v Speaker 1>never prepared and he never investigated. He never considered giving

0:28:46.040 --> 0:29:00.200
<v Speaker 1>James Earl Ray a trial. For what reason, I don't know. Ye,

0:29:09.360 --> 0:29:11.640
<v Speaker 1>so Foreman said that the Haynes boys would not give

0:29:11.720 --> 0:29:14.959
<v Speaker 1>him anything, while Haynes Junior and Senior claimed they were

0:29:15.040 --> 0:29:18.120
<v Speaker 1>shocked by Foreman's lack of interest in the case. So

0:29:18.240 --> 0:29:21.200
<v Speaker 1>who was telling the truth? Smart money would be on

0:29:21.320 --> 0:29:24.760
<v Speaker 1>art Haynes Sr. Because, first of all, Judge Preston Battle

0:29:24.880 --> 0:29:27.920
<v Speaker 1>never cited him for contempt in this matter. And second,

0:29:28.440 --> 0:29:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Haynes was upset enough about the whole thing that a

0:29:31.280 --> 0:29:34.320
<v Speaker 1>few days later he felt compelled to take the unusual

0:29:34.440 --> 0:29:37.240
<v Speaker 1>step to write a letter to Judge Battle, a letter

0:29:37.360 --> 0:29:40.640
<v Speaker 1>that is still in the official files. It is my

0:29:40.800 --> 0:29:45.200
<v Speaker 1>distinct impression, he wrote that Foreman is disinterested in making

0:29:45.320 --> 0:29:48.600
<v Speaker 1>a genuine effort to obtain the benefit from the fruits

0:29:48.640 --> 0:29:52.240
<v Speaker 1>of our labor. His brief visit from a layover between

0:29:52.360 --> 0:29:55.400
<v Speaker 1>planes has been the only contact we've had with him.

0:29:56.760 --> 0:30:00.680
<v Speaker 1>At the House Select Committee hearing Congressman McKinney of Connecticut

0:30:01.080 --> 0:30:04.280
<v Speaker 1>question Foreman on his hard cell of the plea bargain

0:30:04.440 --> 0:30:08.480
<v Speaker 1>to Ray, You had a government case where ballistics were weak,

0:30:08.680 --> 0:30:12.280
<v Speaker 1>You had a key eye witness who was an alcoholic.

0:30:13.640 --> 0:30:19.200
<v Speaker 1>You had testimonial conflicts on when the bundle was dropped

0:30:19.240 --> 0:30:21.840
<v Speaker 1>in front of the store. There were no prints found

0:30:21.880 --> 0:30:26.320
<v Speaker 1>in the rooming house or in the bathroom, Solomon Jones,

0:30:26.640 --> 0:30:30.400
<v Speaker 1>for for one, place the shooter outside of the area

0:30:30.520 --> 0:30:34.800
<v Speaker 1>at the time. And finally, Ray had never in his

0:30:34.920 --> 0:30:38.320
<v Speaker 1>background had any history of quote unquote violence. Doesn't that

0:30:38.400 --> 0:30:40.120
<v Speaker 1>bring the odds down to a little better than a

0:30:40.360 --> 0:30:44.520
<v Speaker 1>d I mean, you're a pretty tough lawyer. I've reviewed

0:30:44.560 --> 0:30:46.960
<v Speaker 1>some of the work you've done, and wouldn't that give

0:30:46.960 --> 0:30:50.840
<v Speaker 1>you a fighting chance for a reasonable doubt? The Foreman disagreed.

0:30:51.880 --> 0:30:56.520
<v Speaker 1>My experience in a half a century of defending criminal

0:30:56.640 --> 0:31:02.840
<v Speaker 1>case makes me evaluate case of a lot of standpoints

0:31:02.960 --> 0:31:09.600
<v Speaker 1>that is not available to the average this passionate observer.

0:31:11.520 --> 0:31:14.880
<v Speaker 1>So Foreman pulled Frank and said his years in court

0:31:15.000 --> 0:31:18.720
<v Speaker 1>gave him special insight into what was winnable and what wasn't,

0:31:19.480 --> 0:31:22.560
<v Speaker 1>even though on many occasions he had gotten people way

0:31:22.640 --> 0:31:25.680
<v Speaker 1>more guilty than Ray appeared to be off scott free.

0:31:26.720 --> 0:31:29.200
<v Speaker 1>But what was missing here was the follow up question.

0:31:30.240 --> 0:31:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Foreman was a busy guy. Why would he push his

0:31:33.240 --> 0:31:35.600
<v Speaker 1>way into a case if he knew from the start

0:31:35.840 --> 0:31:38.080
<v Speaker 1>that all he would do is oversee a plea bargain

0:31:38.280 --> 0:31:42.080
<v Speaker 1>that the prosecution had already offered, and after that deed

0:31:42.120 --> 0:31:45.440
<v Speaker 1>had been done publicly pat himself on the back for

0:31:45.600 --> 0:31:49.560
<v Speaker 1>pulling off this miracle and saving this man's life. None

0:31:49.600 --> 0:31:54.520
<v Speaker 1>of this rings true. Let's return to the House Committee Chairman.

0:31:54.560 --> 0:31:56.760
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if you could ask the committee clerk to

0:31:57.520 --> 0:31:59.600
<v Speaker 1>hand him this reform on a copy of Martin Luther

0:31:59.720 --> 0:32:03.680
<v Speaker 1>King Shibit f Dash two fifty three. I'll describe this

0:32:03.800 --> 0:32:07.240
<v Speaker 1>exhibit for the record. This is a copy of a

0:32:07.400 --> 0:32:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Look magazine article. It's dated April. The title of the article,

0:32:13.880 --> 0:32:18.360
<v Speaker 1>excuse me is against conspiracy. The author is Mr Foreman,

0:32:18.400 --> 0:32:22.080
<v Speaker 1>the witness today captioned his attorney for James Earl Ray.

0:32:23.000 --> 0:32:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Do you recognize the article? Mr Foreman, I do. Did

0:32:26.560 --> 0:32:30.800
<v Speaker 1>you write the article? I wonder if I could direct

0:32:30.840 --> 0:32:33.560
<v Speaker 1>your attention please to the second paragraph in the article,

0:32:35.120 --> 0:32:37.640
<v Speaker 1>and if you'd follow along with me. I'll read that

0:32:37.760 --> 0:32:42.240
<v Speaker 1>for the record. When last November the brothers of James L.

0:32:42.360 --> 0:32:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Ray sought me out and handed me a letter from him,

0:32:45.880 --> 0:32:50.040
<v Speaker 1>the seeching me to represent him. Now this article, that

0:32:50.200 --> 0:32:54.360
<v Speaker 1>language is not mine, Mr. That language is Bradford. You

0:32:54.640 --> 0:32:57.640
<v Speaker 1>he rewrote this. I wrote it all your good writing.

0:33:00.520 --> 0:33:03.720
<v Speaker 1>The issue here is this James Earl Ray said he

0:33:03.800 --> 0:33:06.880
<v Speaker 1>never invited Percy Foreman to visit him in jail, that

0:33:07.000 --> 0:33:09.920
<v Speaker 1>he just appeared and was given entry, and then pitched

0:33:10.040 --> 0:33:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Ray as to why he would be the better choice

0:33:12.400 --> 0:33:15.280
<v Speaker 1>for an attorney. Ray liked the part where he said

0:33:15.320 --> 0:33:17.280
<v Speaker 1>he was rich enough that he wouldn't need to depend

0:33:17.320 --> 0:33:20.400
<v Speaker 1>on literary contracts and that he'd be able to testify

0:33:20.480 --> 0:33:23.320
<v Speaker 1>at his own trial, which is what he wanted. But

0:33:23.480 --> 0:33:26.360
<v Speaker 1>for the House Committee, the issue was whether Foreman had

0:33:26.400 --> 0:33:29.440
<v Speaker 1>been asked to appear by Ray himself, not his brother,

0:33:30.160 --> 0:33:33.240
<v Speaker 1>and if he had not, Foreman was on shaky legal ground.

0:33:34.040 --> 0:33:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Foreman had responded that Ray had written him a letter

0:33:36.600 --> 0:33:39.760
<v Speaker 1>at his office in Houston asking for him to enter

0:33:39.840 --> 0:33:43.840
<v Speaker 1>the case. I did receive such a letter. It came

0:33:43.920 --> 0:33:46.880
<v Speaker 1>to my office on the eighth of about the eighth

0:33:47.200 --> 0:33:51.480
<v Speaker 1>seventh or eighth of November, and I was in Wakeo,

0:33:51.680 --> 0:33:55.280
<v Speaker 1>or near Wakeo, trying a law shoot when the letter came.

0:33:55.360 --> 0:33:58.120
<v Speaker 1>It was read to be over the fall who read

0:33:58.120 --> 0:34:00.760
<v Speaker 1>the letters to you by secretary? Did you have an

0:34:00.800 --> 0:34:03.880
<v Speaker 1>opportunity when you return to your office to see Mr.

0:34:07.200 --> 0:34:10.359
<v Speaker 1>But James Earl Ray insisted that he hadn't written any

0:34:10.440 --> 0:34:13.440
<v Speaker 1>such letter, and that would be a rather bold story

0:34:13.480 --> 0:34:17.040
<v Speaker 1>to tell because if he had, all Foreman would have

0:34:17.120 --> 0:34:19.680
<v Speaker 1>to do to prove him a liar was produce it.

0:34:20.440 --> 0:34:23.960
<v Speaker 1>But Foreman couldn't, He said, the letter was apparently lost

0:34:24.040 --> 0:34:27.120
<v Speaker 1>with all his other files on the case. Foreman was

0:34:27.239 --> 0:34:31.719
<v Speaker 1>becoming visibly uncomfortable. He had begun this discussion by telling

0:34:31.800 --> 0:34:35.160
<v Speaker 1>the House Committee that he wrote the article in Look magazine.

0:34:35.920 --> 0:34:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Then the story was that Hughie had polished a sentence

0:34:38.440 --> 0:34:42.399
<v Speaker 1>or two. Suddenly it seemed safer to say that none

0:34:42.440 --> 0:34:46.320
<v Speaker 1>of the words were his. The entire article was rewritten,

0:34:47.120 --> 0:34:51.120
<v Speaker 1>every line of it. I was right like a lawyer

0:34:51.680 --> 0:34:56.680
<v Speaker 1>with long six cylinder Latin words. Hugh he writes for

0:34:56.760 --> 0:35:00.960
<v Speaker 1>the public. He translated to make it readable. I do

0:35:01.120 --> 0:35:03.880
<v Speaker 1>not speak literally when I when I say all of

0:35:03.960 --> 0:35:06.080
<v Speaker 1>its mind, I meant the sense and the spirit of

0:35:06.120 --> 0:35:10.280
<v Speaker 1>the article. I do not mean the literal word by word.

0:35:11.600 --> 0:35:15.239
<v Speaker 1>So let's take this explanation. What is Foreman's sense and

0:35:15.440 --> 0:35:18.640
<v Speaker 1>spirit of the article and Look magazine? What does it

0:35:18.760 --> 0:35:23.359
<v Speaker 1>tell us? Remember raise guilty plea fixed in the public mind.

0:35:23.440 --> 0:35:26.200
<v Speaker 1>If there had been any doubt that James Earl Ray

0:35:26.360 --> 0:35:29.440
<v Speaker 1>and no one else had murdered Martin Luther King, But

0:35:29.600 --> 0:35:33.399
<v Speaker 1>why that was still up for grabs, and who would

0:35:33.440 --> 0:35:37.720
<v Speaker 1>know better than Percy Foreman raised attorney just so everyone

0:35:37.760 --> 0:35:41.239
<v Speaker 1>would understand what a regular guy he was. Foreman said

0:35:41.320 --> 0:35:44.000
<v Speaker 1>early in the article that he always assumed that Ray

0:35:44.120 --> 0:35:46.759
<v Speaker 1>was guilty, but that he took the case to save

0:35:46.920 --> 0:35:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Rai's life. This is most certainly a lie, because, as

0:35:50.680 --> 0:35:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Attorney Art Haines has told us, Ray already had a

0:35:53.680 --> 0:35:57.800
<v Speaker 1>plea offer before Foreman showed up. In the article, Foreman

0:35:57.880 --> 0:36:00.359
<v Speaker 1>goes on to group Ray with Oswald and her Hand,

0:36:00.640 --> 0:36:04.239
<v Speaker 1>the alleged killers of John and Robert Kennedy, respectively, all

0:36:04.360 --> 0:36:07.839
<v Speaker 1>of whom wanted, according to Foreman, a shortcut to fame.

0:36:08.440 --> 0:36:13.080
<v Speaker 1>They wanted credit he wrote, top billing headlines, front page pictures.

0:36:13.760 --> 0:36:15.840
<v Speaker 1>But Oswald, just before he was murdered, said he was

0:36:15.880 --> 0:36:18.680
<v Speaker 1>a patsy. Sir Hands said he couldn't remember the crime,

0:36:19.080 --> 0:36:21.920
<v Speaker 1>and Ray said he didn't shoot Martin Luther King. So

0:36:22.040 --> 0:36:24.799
<v Speaker 1>whatever they did or didn't do, it doesn't seem as

0:36:24.880 --> 0:36:28.240
<v Speaker 1>though any of them was looking for fame. But according

0:36:28.280 --> 0:36:31.400
<v Speaker 1>to Foreman, Ray made special efforts to make sure that

0:36:31.560 --> 0:36:35.120
<v Speaker 1>he got credit for this crime before he fled the

0:36:35.239 --> 0:36:39.279
<v Speaker 1>murder scene. Foreman wrote, James Earl Ray carefully deposited on

0:36:39.400 --> 0:36:42.360
<v Speaker 1>the sidewalk the murder weapon that he had wrapped in

0:36:42.440 --> 0:36:45.080
<v Speaker 1>his own bed cover to protect his fingerprints on the

0:36:45.239 --> 0:36:48.960
<v Speaker 1>rifle from being obliterated. Ray thought a war between the

0:36:49.080 --> 0:36:52.240
<v Speaker 1>racest was imminent and he wanted to fire the first shot.

0:36:52.880 --> 0:36:55.880
<v Speaker 1>The shooting of doctor King was to him the pearl

0:36:55.960 --> 0:37:05.720
<v Speaker 1>harbor of that war. The presumption here is that because

0:37:05.840 --> 0:37:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Foreman was Ray's attorney, he knew these damning things about

0:37:09.200 --> 0:37:12.719
<v Speaker 1>Ray because Ray had told him. But Ray always said

0:37:12.760 --> 0:37:14.600
<v Speaker 1>he had nothing to do with the package wrapped in

0:37:14.640 --> 0:37:18.160
<v Speaker 1>the bedspread found on the street. He never told Foreman

0:37:18.320 --> 0:37:20.800
<v Speaker 1>that he placed the package there, or that he wrapped

0:37:20.840 --> 0:37:24.000
<v Speaker 1>it carefully so as not to erase his fingerprints. This

0:37:24.400 --> 0:37:27.520
<v Speaker 1>is Foreman's invention. And of course, if Ray had wanted

0:37:27.600 --> 0:37:30.040
<v Speaker 1>the rifle to point back to him so we would

0:37:30.080 --> 0:37:32.720
<v Speaker 1>get credit for the crime, as Foreman was now saying,

0:37:33.320 --> 0:37:34.840
<v Speaker 1>he could have just left it in his room and

0:37:34.920 --> 0:37:37.719
<v Speaker 1>gotten a better start out of town. And Ray never

0:37:37.800 --> 0:37:40.680
<v Speaker 1>said to anyone, much less Foreman, that he wanted to

0:37:40.760 --> 0:37:43.040
<v Speaker 1>fire the first shot in a race war that he

0:37:43.160 --> 0:37:46.879
<v Speaker 1>was trying to start. These are lies, rather vicious lies,

0:37:47.480 --> 0:37:49.719
<v Speaker 1>vicious because they would shape the way people all over

0:37:49.800 --> 0:37:54.400
<v Speaker 1>America would see Ray as a ruthless killer driven by hatred,

0:37:55.880 --> 0:37:58.960
<v Speaker 1>So Percy Foreman pushed his way into the case, talking

0:37:59.000 --> 0:38:01.880
<v Speaker 1>about what an easy when it would be, made himself

0:38:02.000 --> 0:38:04.480
<v Speaker 1>scarce as he attended to other business, and then showed

0:38:04.560 --> 0:38:06.840
<v Speaker 1>up one day saying that Ray had to plead guilty.

0:38:07.640 --> 0:38:11.040
<v Speaker 1>And after Ray made the plea, Foreman published an article

0:38:11.120 --> 0:38:15.120
<v Speaker 1>where he congratulated himself for saving Ray's life and then

0:38:15.160 --> 0:38:18.839
<v Speaker 1>went on to assassinate his character. What was he doing here?

0:38:19.520 --> 0:38:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Who was he working for? Is there anything in Foreman's

0:38:22.880 --> 0:38:27.480
<v Speaker 1>subsequent history that might give us a clue? Turns out

0:38:27.560 --> 0:38:31.480
<v Speaker 1>there is. In nineteen seventy five, Percy Foreman received a

0:38:31.560 --> 0:38:35.680
<v Speaker 1>felony indictment for obstruction of justice from a federal grand

0:38:35.760 --> 0:38:40.480
<v Speaker 1>jury in Texas. What did he do? In nineteen seventy

0:38:40.760 --> 0:38:44.000
<v Speaker 1>just one year after Foreman leaned on Ray to plead guilty,

0:38:44.560 --> 0:38:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Herbert and Nelson bunker Hunt, the sons of Texas billionaire H. L. Hunt,

0:38:49.480 --> 0:38:53.760
<v Speaker 1>hired private detective John Kelly to do some illegal wire tapping,

0:38:54.520 --> 0:38:57.520
<v Speaker 1>but he got caught. The Hunt brothers didn't want to

0:38:57.520 --> 0:39:00.400
<v Speaker 1>go to jail, so they offered Kelly money if he

0:39:00.440 --> 0:39:03.640
<v Speaker 1>would not testify against them, but Kelly didn't want to

0:39:03.640 --> 0:39:08.200
<v Speaker 1>go to jail either. Then Percy Foreman shows up, offers

0:39:08.480 --> 0:39:11.480
<v Speaker 1>his services to Kelly and promises to keep him out

0:39:11.480 --> 0:39:16.040
<v Speaker 1>of jail. Kelly pays Foreman a retainer of one thousand dollars,

0:39:16.640 --> 0:39:19.440
<v Speaker 1>but as soon as the ink is dry on their contract,

0:39:20.000 --> 0:39:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Foreman approaches the Hunt brothers and says that he has

0:39:22.960 --> 0:39:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Kelly Quote under control, and if the Hunts will give

0:39:26.680 --> 0:39:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Foreman fifty thousand dollars, he will guarantee that Kelly will

0:39:30.000 --> 0:39:34.319
<v Speaker 1>not incriminate them, As the indictment tells us. Foreman has

0:39:34.360 --> 0:39:37.080
<v Speaker 1>paid his money and then goes back to Kelly, acting

0:39:37.160 --> 0:39:40.200
<v Speaker 1>all concerned, and reminds him that the Hunts are very

0:39:40.360 --> 0:39:43.239
<v Speaker 1>rich with mob connections and they would think nothing of

0:39:43.360 --> 0:39:48.120
<v Speaker 1>killing him. So it's Foreman's recommendation as his lawyer, that

0:39:48.320 --> 0:39:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Kelly go to jail and say nothing about the Hunts.

0:39:51.920 --> 0:39:55.840
<v Speaker 1>After all, says Foreman, according to the indictment, the government

0:39:55.920 --> 0:39:59.000
<v Speaker 1>can't help you a whole lot if you're dead. But

0:39:59.200 --> 0:40:01.759
<v Speaker 1>by sheer acts sit in, Kelly finds out about the

0:40:01.800 --> 0:40:05.040
<v Speaker 1>double cross, and Foreman and the Hunt Brothers are indicted

0:40:05.120 --> 0:40:08.360
<v Speaker 1>for obstruction of justice, a crime that might well have

0:40:08.440 --> 0:40:11.840
<v Speaker 1>cost Foreman a license to practice law, But the people

0:40:11.960 --> 0:40:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Foreman is in trouble with are very wealthy and connected.

0:40:16.320 --> 0:40:19.960
<v Speaker 1>There are negotiations, time goes by, and the charges are

0:40:20.080 --> 0:40:24.200
<v Speaker 1>quietly dropped, but the facts are really not in dispute.

0:40:24.800 --> 0:40:27.239
<v Speaker 1>Foreman found a weak client with powerful people on the

0:40:27.320 --> 0:40:30.920
<v Speaker 1>other side. He signed up the client, chopped him around,

0:40:31.160 --> 0:40:34.560
<v Speaker 1>and received fifty dollars for making sure the client pled

0:40:34.640 --> 0:40:39.600
<v Speaker 1>guilty and didn't involve anyone else. Does that storyline sound familiar?

0:40:40.400 --> 0:40:44.239
<v Speaker 1>Did Foreman do something of the same with James Earl Ray? Well,

0:40:44.320 --> 0:40:46.400
<v Speaker 1>we think he did, and we think we have the

0:40:46.480 --> 0:40:49.279
<v Speaker 1>evidence to prove it. So we will come back to

0:40:49.360 --> 0:40:52.120
<v Speaker 1>this story later in the podcast and take a trip

0:40:52.200 --> 0:41:04.680
<v Speaker 1>to Mr Foreman's office in Houston next time. On the

0:41:04.719 --> 0:41:08.640
<v Speaker 1>Emilk tapes, Showers was in the frame right from the beginning,

0:41:08.719 --> 0:41:11.600
<v Speaker 1>because he was the one who run Jim Squirrel. He

0:41:11.800 --> 0:41:13.960
<v Speaker 1>looked back, he has stuck his frame in his socket.

0:41:14.400 --> 0:41:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Lord hair was standing up and he like somebody had

0:41:17.239 --> 0:41:20.399
<v Speaker 1>drained all the good d He was so white. Oh

0:41:20.560 --> 0:41:23.360
<v Speaker 1>you're so r I said, Lord. I said, you know,

0:41:23.760 --> 0:41:26.360
<v Speaker 1>they've been a lot of discussion about the fact you

0:41:26.440 --> 0:41:29.279
<v Speaker 1>may have been involved in the Martin Luth King assassination.

0:41:29.360 --> 0:41:31.799
<v Speaker 1>And he said, well, a lot of people talking about

0:41:31.840 --> 0:41:33.480
<v Speaker 1>he said it. One thing, saure that blanket back is

0:41:33.520 --> 0:41:36.400
<v Speaker 1>not coming back. But he said when he went to

0:41:36.560 --> 0:41:39.560
<v Speaker 1>the back door, just as he got to the door,

0:41:39.800 --> 0:41:43.280
<v Speaker 1>shot right now, and somebody came out of the bushes

0:41:44.120 --> 0:41:47.920
<v Speaker 1>and handed him smoking rifle. He wanted me to tell

0:41:48.000 --> 0:41:50.880
<v Speaker 1>the truth about seeing him with the rifle. He just

0:41:51.000 --> 0:41:54.440
<v Speaker 1>wanted me change just a little bit by saying I

0:41:54.719 --> 0:41:58.759
<v Speaker 1>saw him standing in the back door and a black man.

0:41:59.400 --> 0:42:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Hey in my righte. Did James Earl Ray killed Dr

0:42:03.239 --> 0:42:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Mark Luther King? No, they did not. Do you know

0:42:06.680 --> 0:42:09.680
<v Speaker 1>who killed Dr King? I know who paid to do

0:42:17.120 --> 0:42:18.840
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the m l K Tapes a

0:42:18.920 --> 0:42:22.360
<v Speaker 1>production of I Heart Radio and Tenderfoot TV. This podcast

0:42:22.480 --> 0:42:24.920
<v Speaker 1>is not specifically endorsed by the King Family or the

0:42:25.000 --> 0:42:27.600
<v Speaker 1>King of State. D email KA Tapes is written and

0:42:27.680 --> 0:42:30.960
<v Speaker 1>hosted by Bill Claper. Matt Frederick and Alex Williams are

0:42:31.000 --> 0:42:34.320
<v Speaker 1>executive producers on behalf of I Heart Radio with producers

0:42:34.400 --> 0:42:37.960
<v Speaker 1>Trevor Young and ben Keebrick. Donald Albright and Payne Lindsay

0:42:38.040 --> 0:42:41.480
<v Speaker 1>are executive producers on behalf of Tenderfoot TV with producers

0:42:41.600 --> 0:42:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Jamie Albright and Meredith Steadman. Original music by Makeup and

0:42:45.520 --> 0:42:49.480
<v Speaker 1>Vanity Said. Cover art by Mr Soul two six with

0:42:49.600 --> 0:42:53.800
<v Speaker 1>photography by Artemis Jenkins. Special thanks to Owen Rosenbaum and

0:42:53.880 --> 0:42:56.919
<v Speaker 1>Grace Royer at U t A, The Nord Group, back

0:42:57.040 --> 0:43:01.759
<v Speaker 1>Median Marketing, Envisioned Business Management, and Station sixteen. If you

0:43:01.840 --> 0:43:04.360
<v Speaker 1>have questions, you can visit our website, the email k

0:43:04.520 --> 0:43:08.040
<v Speaker 1>tapes dot com. We posted photos and videos related to

0:43:08.120 --> 0:43:10.759
<v Speaker 1>the podcast on our social media accounts. You can check

0:43:10.800 --> 0:43:14.000
<v Speaker 1>them out at the email k Tapes. For more podcasts

0:43:14.000 --> 0:43:16.800
<v Speaker 1>from I Heart Radio and Tenderfoot TV, please visit the

0:43:16.840 --> 0:43:19.919
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen

0:43:20.000 --> 0:43:20.800
<v Speaker 1>to your favorite shows,