WEBVTT - China's Covid Protests and Musk's Apple Feud

0:00:14.160 --> 0:00:17.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm Caroline had a Bloomberg's World headquarters in New York

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:20.400
<v Speaker 1>and the d Ludlow in San Francisco. This is Bloomberg

0:00:20.400 --> 0:00:23.880
<v Speaker 1>Technology coming up in the next hour. Uncertainties around China's

0:00:23.920 --> 0:00:27.319
<v Speaker 1>COVID curbs, the human story and the technology story. What

0:00:27.480 --> 0:00:32.000
<v Speaker 1>unrest means for Apple and iPhone production in the months ahead. Last,

0:00:32.040 --> 0:00:34.920
<v Speaker 1>sticking with Apple, the tech giant is being called out

0:00:35.000 --> 0:00:37.800
<v Speaker 1>by none other then Elon Musk, the tip Twitter chief,

0:00:38.000 --> 0:00:41.720
<v Speaker 1>tweeting it's CEO Tim Cook asking if the company quote

0:00:42.000 --> 0:00:46.440
<v Speaker 1>hates free speech, and another one bites the dust. Crypto

0:00:46.520 --> 0:00:49.279
<v Speaker 1>lender block Fire has filed for bankruptcy in the aftermath

0:00:49.280 --> 0:00:52.160
<v Speaker 1>of f t X, and the US government is among

0:00:52.240 --> 0:00:55.800
<v Speaker 1>one of the key creditors. Will explain, but first head

0:00:55.880 --> 0:00:57.880
<v Speaker 1>let's check in on those markets, because today was a

0:00:57.960 --> 0:01:00.560
<v Speaker 1>day once again of Federal Reserve of Matt grow picture

0:01:00.840 --> 0:01:03.480
<v Speaker 1>impacting the text dogs. We're seeing the SMP from hundreds

0:01:03.440 --> 0:01:04.920
<v Speaker 1>off by one and a half percent, biggest sell off

0:01:04.959 --> 0:01:07.160
<v Speaker 1>since November the ninth. Similar moves in terms of the

0:01:07.240 --> 0:01:09.880
<v Speaker 1>NAZAC off by one point six percent. Big tech rolls

0:01:09.959 --> 0:01:13.240
<v Speaker 1>over as once again fed speaks seems to irk the market.

0:01:13.480 --> 0:01:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Federal reserve. The leaders over at New York FED, for example,

0:01:16.440 --> 0:01:18.440
<v Speaker 1>John Williams, or you're looking over at Jim Bullard over

0:01:18.480 --> 0:01:20.880
<v Speaker 1>at St. Louis FED, both talking about the need for

0:01:20.959 --> 0:01:23.800
<v Speaker 1>further rate hikes. Rates go higher, the dollar goes higher,

0:01:23.800 --> 0:01:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Crypto goes lower. Bitcoin, of course resets at this particular hour,

0:01:26.959 --> 0:01:29.240
<v Speaker 1>but it has been trading lower versus the US dollar,

0:01:29.280 --> 0:01:31.080
<v Speaker 1>and we're seeing that at sixteen thousand, two hundred and

0:01:31.160 --> 0:01:34.039
<v Speaker 1>six down about two on the day of Monday today.

0:01:34.040 --> 0:01:36.039
<v Speaker 1>It just resets and we're calling it flat. Let's move

0:01:36.080 --> 0:01:39.399
<v Speaker 1>on to see what also was irking investors was also

0:01:39.440 --> 0:01:42.360
<v Speaker 1>this dampening on sentiment about what is happening in China,

0:01:42.440 --> 0:01:45.680
<v Speaker 1>the protests. What's interesting here, though, is that the Naza

0:01:45.760 --> 0:01:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Golden Dragon China actually rallid. Why why when you see

0:01:50.080 --> 0:01:53.360
<v Speaker 1>unprecedented levels of protest versus Yjing Ping versus of course

0:01:53.600 --> 0:01:56.480
<v Speaker 1>the concerns of a COVID lockdown. Well maybe just maybe

0:01:56.800 --> 0:01:58.920
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese stocks being traded here in the US were

0:01:59.040 --> 0:02:01.680
<v Speaker 1>upside ed because something that actually that will mean a

0:02:01.720 --> 0:02:04.120
<v Speaker 1>movement towards the reopening of the economy. We're up two

0:02:04.120 --> 0:02:07.720
<v Speaker 1>point eight. Yeah. E commerce are really big driver in

0:02:07.760 --> 0:02:10.040
<v Speaker 1>the markets. On individual names. I'm looking at Amazon, one

0:02:10.080 --> 0:02:11.880
<v Speaker 1>of the through few stocks in the green on the

0:02:11.960 --> 0:02:15.480
<v Speaker 1>NaSTA one on Monday, probably the biggest points gainer as well.

0:02:15.520 --> 0:02:19.359
<v Speaker 1>There's optimism around the sales outlook from Black Friday going

0:02:19.400 --> 0:02:21.960
<v Speaker 1>into Cyber Monday, which is ongoing. Of course, that stock

0:02:22.080 --> 0:02:25.560
<v Speaker 1>higher by around six tenths of one percent. Pindo do

0:02:25.760 --> 0:02:29.760
<v Speaker 1>really interesting, really strong earnings from a Chinese e commerce

0:02:29.800 --> 0:02:32.520
<v Speaker 1>giant on the lower end, the discount end having its

0:02:32.520 --> 0:02:34.880
<v Speaker 1>best days since August, the stock trading at its highest

0:02:34.960 --> 0:02:37.519
<v Speaker 1>level in a year. Again that story as well. Caroline

0:02:37.520 --> 0:02:40.160
<v Speaker 1>probably a factor that what we're seeing play out in

0:02:40.240 --> 0:02:43.480
<v Speaker 1>China might result in a policy change which would be

0:02:43.520 --> 0:02:46.480
<v Speaker 1>supportive for business and tech. Disney down three percent according

0:02:46.520 --> 0:02:49.399
<v Speaker 1>to people listening into Bob Igner's first town hall, they're

0:02:49.400 --> 0:02:51.120
<v Speaker 1>going to keep with it when it comes to the

0:02:51.200 --> 0:02:54.560
<v Speaker 1>hiring freeze, and they're warning about a move from linear TV,

0:02:54.880 --> 0:02:57.600
<v Speaker 1>saying activisions are stop. We' getting into later very quickly. Apple,

0:02:57.840 --> 0:02:59.919
<v Speaker 1>We've got to talk about this stock, Caroline, because it's

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:02.320
<v Speaker 1>under pressure with what we're seeing play out in China

0:03:02.360 --> 0:03:05.000
<v Speaker 1>and the impact to production as well. Yeah, I look

0:03:05.000 --> 0:03:06.919
<v Speaker 1>at that over the last couple of days, Apple down

0:03:06.960 --> 0:03:09.679
<v Speaker 1>four and a half percent. You've been driving that story home,

0:03:09.840 --> 0:03:12.840
<v Speaker 1>ed and let's dive into a little bit more, because well,

0:03:12.880 --> 0:03:16.359
<v Speaker 1>it's been gripping the entire world, China's growing process against

0:03:16.400 --> 0:03:19.840
<v Speaker 1>COVID curbs and a record number of infections complicating the

0:03:19.919 --> 0:03:23.560
<v Speaker 1>nations path to reopening. Here's what some Bloomberg TV guests

0:03:23.600 --> 0:03:26.400
<v Speaker 1>had to say about the sense of uncertainty just sweeping

0:03:26.440 --> 0:03:30.160
<v Speaker 1>through Chinese markets. As long as we're seeing the the

0:03:30.240 --> 0:03:33.959
<v Speaker 1>ongoing COVID zero policy, we're not going to see um,

0:03:34.000 --> 0:03:37.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, much of a stabilization in domestic demand unless

0:03:37.640 --> 0:03:41.720
<v Speaker 1>the government really moves away from its targeted approach. At

0:03:41.720 --> 0:03:46.760
<v Speaker 1>this point, it looks like that a rabbit or um

0:03:46.800 --> 0:03:51.360
<v Speaker 1>a reckless opening of the economy will be worse for

0:03:51.760 --> 0:03:55.280
<v Speaker 1>China's growth because the biggest problem now, of course, is

0:03:55.320 --> 0:03:57.680
<v Speaker 1>in the labor market. For the time being, it seems

0:03:58.080 --> 0:04:00.920
<v Speaker 1>that our performance that we have seen in the Greater

0:04:01.000 --> 0:04:04.320
<v Speaker 1>China region UM could be kept in the very near term.

0:04:04.600 --> 0:04:06.840
<v Speaker 1>The next few months are clearly going to be challenging,

0:04:07.160 --> 0:04:10.240
<v Speaker 1>but we still feel comfortable that in the second half,

0:04:11.000 --> 0:04:13.800
<v Speaker 1>China is going to be a much better story from

0:04:13.800 --> 0:04:17.920
<v Speaker 1>an investment perspective. Interestingly, the all that's doing well primarily

0:04:17.920 --> 0:04:21.440
<v Speaker 1>because people can't travel. So we've seen seeing you know,

0:04:22.080 --> 0:04:24.760
<v Speaker 1>a good spending and a good foot traffic in them

0:04:24.760 --> 0:04:28.840
<v Speaker 1>are a macro perspective there. Let's dig into the technology

0:04:28.920 --> 0:04:31.400
<v Speaker 1>impact as well. Blue Makes Debbie over in Washington, and

0:04:31.440 --> 0:04:34.200
<v Speaker 1>of course there be you cover in particular Fox. Can

0:04:34.320 --> 0:04:37.520
<v Speaker 1>you cover in particular Taiwanese companies as well as Chinese

0:04:37.520 --> 0:04:39.880
<v Speaker 1>and just talk to us about whether or not this

0:04:39.920 --> 0:04:42.360
<v Speaker 1>is an unprecedented in nature and what it really means

0:04:42.400 --> 0:04:46.760
<v Speaker 1>for business for the economy in China right now. So

0:04:46.920 --> 0:04:50.200
<v Speaker 1>what we have seen is u this is becoming a

0:04:50.400 --> 0:04:54.200
<v Speaker 1>challenging situation for supply chin in China over world. White

0:04:54.200 --> 0:04:57.440
<v Speaker 1>House set today that they don't see a major impact

0:04:57.720 --> 0:05:02.359
<v Speaker 1>um supply Chinda. For more recent UH part protest aura

0:05:02.800 --> 0:05:06.919
<v Speaker 1>undress in China over the weekend and in this instance,

0:05:07.200 --> 0:05:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Foxang over the weekend actually is offering its sixteen staff

0:05:11.360 --> 0:05:15.560
<v Speaker 1>a monthly bonus of as much as eighteen hundred UH

0:05:15.680 --> 0:05:20.280
<v Speaker 1>yen to UH continue working for the company in Central

0:05:20.360 --> 0:05:24.400
<v Speaker 1>China throughout December and January. And that means South Foksang

0:05:24.560 --> 0:05:28.080
<v Speaker 1>is working very hard to return workers to make sure

0:05:28.120 --> 0:05:32.479
<v Speaker 1>that the Apple will have far enough iPhones to offer

0:05:32.520 --> 0:05:36.400
<v Speaker 1>its customers to the holiday quarter, and our coholique in

0:05:36.720 --> 0:05:41.240
<v Speaker 1>Asia have reported UH earlier this week that Apple is

0:05:41.360 --> 0:05:44.120
<v Speaker 1>UH and Baksang are actually a facing illustration that they

0:05:44.160 --> 0:05:47.640
<v Speaker 1>could face a short full of as many as six

0:05:47.720 --> 0:05:52.599
<v Speaker 1>millionaire units of iPhone pros, the most sought after models

0:05:52.600 --> 0:05:55.960
<v Speaker 1>of new iPhones this year due to a reason memorial

0:05:56.120 --> 0:06:00.080
<v Speaker 1>in it at the plant in central China. Debbie, do

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:01.720
<v Speaker 1>we have any sense of when things are going to

0:06:01.839 --> 0:06:04.240
<v Speaker 1>normalize the Apple in terms of the production line you

0:06:04.279 --> 0:06:06.919
<v Speaker 1>mentioned the six million unit short for I think the

0:06:06.960 --> 0:06:09.960
<v Speaker 1>source also told Bloomberg that there was confidence they can

0:06:10.040 --> 0:06:14.640
<v Speaker 1>make up ground in three uh. Yes, But at the

0:06:14.680 --> 0:06:17.680
<v Speaker 1>same time, the situation remains fluids because we are not

0:06:17.720 --> 0:06:20.479
<v Speaker 1>sure whether there's going to be a full of lockdowns

0:06:20.520 --> 0:06:23.680
<v Speaker 1>in the region that could have an impact on this situation.

0:06:24.040 --> 0:06:27.080
<v Speaker 1>So another person familiar with the situation has told Boomberg

0:06:27.160 --> 0:06:32.200
<v Speaker 1>that the existing workers affected by ongoing luckdowns are being

0:06:32.400 --> 0:06:35.440
<v Speaker 1>able to return to work at the Faxangsa plant in

0:06:35.480 --> 0:06:40.320
<v Speaker 1>central China is a major factor affecting a production as well.

0:06:40.440 --> 0:06:42.440
<v Speaker 1>So I guess we just have to wait and see

0:06:42.480 --> 0:06:47.320
<v Speaker 1>what happens over the next couple of weeks. Okay, Bloomberg, steady, Well,

0:06:47.400 --> 0:06:50.800
<v Speaker 1>thank you very much. Let's continue the conversation now with

0:06:50.920 --> 0:06:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Scott Muscovitz, Asia Pacific GEO political risk analyst for the

0:06:54.600 --> 0:06:58.279
<v Speaker 1>Decision Intelligence Company. Morning Console, And I guess the question

0:06:58.320 --> 0:07:02.400
<v Speaker 1>we go to now is is this a flashpoint, Scott,

0:07:02.600 --> 0:07:05.800
<v Speaker 1>or is this going to be an extended period of

0:07:06.320 --> 0:07:10.120
<v Speaker 1>political social disruption in China in response to what is

0:07:10.240 --> 0:07:15.080
<v Speaker 1>essentially policy right from the Chinese government. Yeah, thanks for

0:07:15.160 --> 0:07:19.000
<v Speaker 1>having me, Um. I think that's an excellent question. Uh, certainly,

0:07:19.240 --> 0:07:23.920
<v Speaker 1>these protests are unprecedented there, unlike anything we've seen, the

0:07:24.000 --> 0:07:26.640
<v Speaker 1>quickness with which they spiraled, in the fact that they

0:07:26.640 --> 0:07:31.400
<v Speaker 1>are taking place across multiple cities, across multiple geographies, and

0:07:31.680 --> 0:07:34.760
<v Speaker 1>that somehow people in one city seem to be aware

0:07:34.800 --> 0:07:38.360
<v Speaker 1>of people in other cities were protesting, and we're you know,

0:07:38.480 --> 0:07:42.720
<v Speaker 1>drawing inspiration from each other. That is something that rarely

0:07:42.720 --> 0:07:45.120
<v Speaker 1>see in China, where the state is normally so good

0:07:45.160 --> 0:07:47.800
<v Speaker 1>at atomizing these things and sort of swooping them under

0:07:47.840 --> 0:07:49.920
<v Speaker 1>the rug. This is going to be much harder to

0:07:49.960 --> 0:07:52.800
<v Speaker 1>put it back in the bottle, so to speak, Scott. Already,

0:07:52.880 --> 0:07:56.559
<v Speaker 1>of course, many an international company has been worried about

0:07:56.560 --> 0:07:59.360
<v Speaker 1>doing business in China, largely because of the COVID lockdowns,

0:07:59.400 --> 0:08:02.680
<v Speaker 1>and also add that healthy dose of geo political tensions

0:08:02.720 --> 0:08:05.360
<v Speaker 1>between for example, the U S and China antagonized in

0:08:05.400 --> 0:08:07.680
<v Speaker 1>some way, perhaps over the course of the weekend the

0:08:07.680 --> 0:08:10.880
<v Speaker 1>news that zt and and the likes of Huawei won't

0:08:10.880 --> 0:08:13.560
<v Speaker 1>be able to sell their products into the US. How

0:08:13.600 --> 0:08:18.120
<v Speaker 1>does this affect, for example, U S China relations going forward. Well,

0:08:18.160 --> 0:08:20.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how much bearing this has specifically on

0:08:20.560 --> 0:08:23.800
<v Speaker 1>US channel relations, but US officials have to tread really

0:08:24.000 --> 0:08:26.400
<v Speaker 1>carefully here because they want to show their support and

0:08:26.400 --> 0:08:28.200
<v Speaker 1>they want to express their support for any sort of

0:08:28.560 --> 0:08:31.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, free and open protest, especially one that might

0:08:32.360 --> 0:08:35.440
<v Speaker 1>signal a greater desire even for democracy some people have

0:08:35.520 --> 0:08:38.720
<v Speaker 1>been talking about, which is very rare. But the second

0:08:38.880 --> 0:08:41.600
<v Speaker 1>U S officials step in and start, you know, saying

0:08:41.640 --> 0:08:44.160
<v Speaker 1>how much they support it, China can latch onto those

0:08:44.200 --> 0:08:47.280
<v Speaker 1>sorts of narratives and start to spin it as this

0:08:47.760 --> 0:08:50.160
<v Speaker 1>is something that you know was cooked up by the

0:08:50.240 --> 0:08:53.880
<v Speaker 1>U S. Start going to this sort of conspiracy theory propaganda,

0:08:54.080 --> 0:08:57.400
<v Speaker 1>and so that's something they have to tread very lately. Um,

0:08:57.440 --> 0:08:59.959
<v Speaker 1>not just because they don't want to, you know, make

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:04.480
<v Speaker 1>the progesters look bad, but also because that could also

0:09:04.840 --> 0:09:07.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, really harm us channelations which are just starting

0:09:07.920 --> 0:09:11.360
<v Speaker 1>to recover after the recent t did in meeting Scott

0:09:11.360 --> 0:09:14.720
<v Speaker 1>earlier today, I spoke to the CFO of in Finian,

0:09:14.760 --> 0:09:18.360
<v Speaker 1>a chip maker that has a significant operational and sales

0:09:18.400 --> 0:09:20.760
<v Speaker 1>footprint in China. This is what he had to say

0:09:20.760 --> 0:09:25.679
<v Speaker 1>about the situation. We have really improved our resilience a

0:09:25.720 --> 0:09:29.720
<v Speaker 1>lot over the over the past quarters, months and years,

0:09:29.760 --> 0:09:33.600
<v Speaker 1>and therefore we are looking at with with concern. But

0:09:33.880 --> 0:09:37.240
<v Speaker 1>up to now there is no direct implication visible on

0:09:37.280 --> 0:09:40.960
<v Speaker 1>our operations in China or the region, and we have

0:09:41.160 --> 0:09:45.359
<v Speaker 1>backup plans in case it becomes necessary to make adjustments.

0:09:46.400 --> 0:09:48.840
<v Speaker 1>When I listened to Spend, he makes it seem like

0:09:48.880 --> 0:09:52.040
<v Speaker 1>this is just the latest in a string of ongoing disruption.

0:09:52.480 --> 0:09:55.160
<v Speaker 1>What is your assessment about the reality of life on

0:09:55.200 --> 0:09:59.480
<v Speaker 1>the ground and operating in China right now? Well, I

0:09:59.480 --> 0:10:01.720
<v Speaker 1>don't get this. It's that everything has ground to the

0:10:01.720 --> 0:10:04.000
<v Speaker 1>halt to a halt, But I do get the sense

0:10:04.040 --> 0:10:06.080
<v Speaker 1>that we're in sort of a weight and see moment.

0:10:06.160 --> 0:10:09.120
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't seem like they've been able to dispurse these crowds.

0:10:09.559 --> 0:10:12.000
<v Speaker 1>They sort of missed the window on you know, censoring

0:10:12.080 --> 0:10:14.040
<v Speaker 1>and isolating it right away. And even as they start

0:10:14.080 --> 0:10:16.839
<v Speaker 1>to do that, people know that these protests are going on,

0:10:17.000 --> 0:10:19.520
<v Speaker 1>and they you know, are aware people are showing up

0:10:19.520 --> 0:10:21.600
<v Speaker 1>with their blank pieces of paper. That's been the real

0:10:21.720 --> 0:10:25.200
<v Speaker 1>prop of the protest um. Whether it's sort of grinding

0:10:25.240 --> 0:10:27.400
<v Speaker 1>to a halt. We saw you talked about earlier those

0:10:27.800 --> 0:10:29.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, protests in Jung Joe, but those were those

0:10:29.840 --> 0:10:31.600
<v Speaker 1>were more isolated. I get the sense that these are

0:10:31.679 --> 0:10:34.440
<v Speaker 1>more you know, urban middle class protests. We haven't seen

0:10:34.520 --> 0:10:38.160
<v Speaker 1>so much labor protests outside of that. So it's a question, um.

0:10:38.240 --> 0:10:40.360
<v Speaker 1>But there's a lot of uncertainty, and we know that

0:10:40.440 --> 0:10:44.840
<v Speaker 1>sometimes COVID lockdowns have been used almost politically, and so

0:10:44.960 --> 0:10:46.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, anything is sort of on the table, really

0:10:46.920 --> 0:10:49.400
<v Speaker 1>waiting to see how this will unfold. Now. I know,

0:10:49.520 --> 0:10:54.000
<v Speaker 1>in some ways what has occurred at Fox con iPhone cities,

0:10:54.040 --> 0:10:57.319
<v Speaker 1>it's known it's somewhat different to what's happening now on

0:10:57.360 --> 0:10:59.960
<v Speaker 1>the streets of Beijing or Shanghai. But they all really

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:02.320
<v Speaker 1>it did. And a lot of this is frustration about

0:11:02.360 --> 0:11:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the way in which people survive amid these COVID lockdown Scott.

0:11:06.520 --> 0:11:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Many have been looking at Apple in this situation. Of course,

0:11:09.080 --> 0:11:11.439
<v Speaker 1>key supply of being that a fox gone, their exposure

0:11:11.480 --> 0:11:15.600
<v Speaker 1>being significant, that they just didn't build enough alternatives, They

0:11:15.600 --> 0:11:17.880
<v Speaker 1>didn't focus enough. They were too heavily dependent as a

0:11:17.920 --> 0:11:20.200
<v Speaker 1>supply chain on China and didn't do much to to

0:11:20.320 --> 0:11:24.760
<v Speaker 1>really disperse that. Do you think companies are now significantly

0:11:24.760 --> 0:11:27.600
<v Speaker 1>moving away from a Chinese supply chain or they look

0:11:27.720 --> 0:11:31.559
<v Speaker 1>to just think that this is an episode. Oh, I

0:11:31.600 --> 0:11:33.680
<v Speaker 1>think you're absolutely right, and I think it predates this.

0:11:33.800 --> 0:11:35.840
<v Speaker 1>I think it was over the summer. Uh, you know,

0:11:35.880 --> 0:11:38.800
<v Speaker 1>after how speaker Pelosity visited Taiwan and there was that

0:11:39.520 --> 0:11:44.280
<v Speaker 1>deeply jinguistic military reaction. People got really stooped and they

0:11:44.280 --> 0:11:46.720
<v Speaker 1>started for the first time to envision a future where

0:11:46.800 --> 0:11:49.880
<v Speaker 1>China might become for a lot of multinational companies geo

0:11:50.040 --> 0:11:53.200
<v Speaker 1>politically off limits. And they all started to scramble and started,

0:11:53.240 --> 0:11:56.720
<v Speaker 1>I think, wow, we need to look at serious contingency planning.

0:11:57.160 --> 0:11:59.839
<v Speaker 1>And things only seem to get worse from there. That's

0:11:59.840 --> 0:12:03.120
<v Speaker 1>what we saw on our data. Um, you know, relations

0:12:03.120 --> 0:12:07.839
<v Speaker 1>seem to get worse and worse. Bilateral negativity only got worse,

0:12:08.160 --> 0:12:10.400
<v Speaker 1>and then it just really did seem to be affecting

0:12:10.480 --> 0:12:12.800
<v Speaker 1>both China and the US. People were concerned. She and

0:12:12.880 --> 0:12:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Biden met. It seemed to calm temperatures, not change anything.

0:12:16.440 --> 0:12:19.559
<v Speaker 1>But really I could a four under relations and this happens,

0:12:19.640 --> 0:12:23.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, right, Scott. We asked our audience what's top

0:12:23.040 --> 0:12:25.199
<v Speaker 1>of mind for them and concerned about what's happening on

0:12:25.240 --> 0:12:29.360
<v Speaker 1>the ground, specifically with Apple. Their answer very clear, working conditions.

0:12:29.720 --> 0:12:32.800
<v Speaker 1>My question to you those working conditions, what we've seen

0:12:32.800 --> 0:12:35.880
<v Speaker 1>on the streets. Do we see a policy pivot from

0:12:35.920 --> 0:12:39.800
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese government. Yeah. I think one thing is that

0:12:39.880 --> 0:12:43.959
<v Speaker 1>the government is sometimes more responsive than people realizing China

0:12:44.080 --> 0:12:47.000
<v Speaker 1>because they don't have the release valve of elections like

0:12:47.040 --> 0:12:49.080
<v Speaker 1>we have, So they're going to have to move in

0:12:49.160 --> 0:12:52.440
<v Speaker 1>order to well dissent. But they have to be very

0:12:52.480 --> 0:12:56.400
<v Speaker 1>careful because you know, if they open up too quickly,

0:12:56.640 --> 0:13:00.079
<v Speaker 1>then it could really emboldened and enable these protests. So

0:13:00.120 --> 0:13:02.240
<v Speaker 1>I think they're going to tread lately. But I don't

0:13:02.400 --> 0:13:05.760
<v Speaker 1>see anything really terrible happening just yet. But we're waiting.

0:13:06.080 --> 0:13:09.000
<v Speaker 1>It could be a victory for the broadesters. You don't know,

0:13:09.240 --> 0:13:13.040
<v Speaker 1>there might be smart movements, you know, Okay, Scott Scott

0:13:13.120 --> 0:13:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Musk of b It's Asia specific GEO political risk analyst

0:13:16.200 --> 0:13:18.760
<v Speaker 1>for Morning Consult, Thank you. Let's stick with Apple, the

0:13:18.800 --> 0:13:22.000
<v Speaker 1>company and it's CEO being called out by Elon Musk,

0:13:22.240 --> 0:13:25.120
<v Speaker 1>who claims Apple has cut back its advertising on Twitter

0:13:25.440 --> 0:13:28.240
<v Speaker 1>and even threatened to withhold the social network from its

0:13:28.240 --> 0:13:31.600
<v Speaker 1>app store. Musk tweeting quote, do they hate free speech

0:13:31.640 --> 0:13:35.160
<v Speaker 1>in America? Question, then posting again, this time including the

0:13:35.160 --> 0:13:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Twitter account of Apple Chief executive Officer Tim Cook. No

0:13:38.600 --> 0:13:41.000
<v Speaker 1>response from Tim Cook on Twitter. Will have more on

0:13:41.080 --> 0:13:44.320
<v Speaker 1>that story later in the hour and coming up. Activision

0:13:44.400 --> 0:13:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Blizzard is gaining some fans while some analysts are raising

0:13:47.840 --> 0:13:52.120
<v Speaker 1>their recommendation despite concerns over Microsoft steel for a takeover

0:13:52.200 --> 0:14:10.160
<v Speaker 1>the Cisplinberg. So Activision Blizzard has gained fans on Wall

0:14:10.160 --> 0:14:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Street as a florry of analysts raised their recommendations on

0:14:13.120 --> 0:14:16.040
<v Speaker 1>the stock, even as microsoft planned acquisition looks more and more.

0:14:16.080 --> 0:14:18.559
<v Speaker 1>Dicey joining us now as being a Bloomberg's m and

0:14:18.600 --> 0:14:21.880
<v Speaker 1>a reporter eachen Sen and Echun just talk to us

0:14:21.880 --> 0:14:24.560
<v Speaker 1>about what you're reporting, showing first and foremost one of

0:14:24.600 --> 0:14:27.440
<v Speaker 1>the odds that this deal actually goes through. Sure, Yeah,

0:14:27.560 --> 0:14:31.040
<v Speaker 1>so I will say, I'm hearing from murder arch traders

0:14:31.120 --> 0:14:34.320
<v Speaker 1>as they see the deal probably is having only roughly

0:14:34.400 --> 0:14:37.880
<v Speaker 1>forty to fifty percent of going through, so it's pretty dicey.

0:14:38.080 --> 0:14:40.920
<v Speaker 1>But it's interesting that we are seeing among the Wall

0:14:40.960 --> 0:14:45.360
<v Speaker 1>Street analysts there brustings here reading on the active Exhibition

0:14:45.440 --> 0:14:48.720
<v Speaker 1>the start itself mainly for two reasons I would say,

0:14:48.920 --> 0:14:52.200
<v Speaker 1>first it's a strong fundamental value and second is it's

0:14:52.240 --> 0:14:56.840
<v Speaker 1>a very attractive root forward profile given the Microsoft situation.

0:14:57.200 --> 0:15:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Because remember Exhibition is in the process as of being

0:15:00.920 --> 0:15:04.960
<v Speaker 1>acquired by Microsoft for sixty nine billions. That's a huge deal. Right.

0:15:05.120 --> 0:15:08.280
<v Speaker 1>But there was a report last week saying that the FTC,

0:15:08.720 --> 0:15:11.400
<v Speaker 1>which as the u S regulator, is going to block

0:15:11.520 --> 0:15:14.960
<v Speaker 1>and challenge the transaction. The sort the starts tumbled, right,

0:15:15.240 --> 0:15:18.120
<v Speaker 1>but the endless points as they see, and they like

0:15:18.320 --> 0:15:22.520
<v Speaker 1>the stock whist or without Microsoft transaction because their case

0:15:22.600 --> 0:15:26.080
<v Speaker 1>has been as a stalear loan company active mission, it

0:15:26.200 --> 0:15:30.120
<v Speaker 1>has strong fundamental, very solid growth outlook and its franchise

0:15:30.200 --> 0:15:33.240
<v Speaker 1>including call of duty. Right, and they will get three

0:15:33.360 --> 0:15:35.960
<v Speaker 1>billion break on fee to add on the balance sheet,

0:15:36.160 --> 0:15:39.200
<v Speaker 1>right if the deal force apart. But on the flip side,

0:15:39.280 --> 0:15:42.240
<v Speaker 1>if you know it goes through, then look at where

0:15:42.840 --> 0:15:46.080
<v Speaker 1>the start is treating. It's like twenty percent below the

0:15:46.200 --> 0:15:49.960
<v Speaker 1>takeover offer. So that's a huge upside to capture in

0:15:50.160 --> 0:15:54.320
<v Speaker 1>that scenario. Ch And you've taught me so much about

0:15:54.360 --> 0:15:56.760
<v Speaker 1>the twists and turns of deal making, you know. You

0:15:56.880 --> 0:15:59.520
<v Speaker 1>and I followed the Twitter deal so closely for months

0:15:59.600 --> 0:16:01.720
<v Speaker 1>for examp and Pool and the thing you taught me

0:16:02.000 --> 0:16:04.680
<v Speaker 1>throughout that process not just to crunch the numbers from

0:16:04.720 --> 0:16:07.040
<v Speaker 1>the murder ofs, but it's to look out for key

0:16:07.120 --> 0:16:11.200
<v Speaker 1>inflection points, key decisions. So what's the big key decision

0:16:11.320 --> 0:16:15.480
<v Speaker 1>or key moment we're looking for between Activision and Microsoft? Right?

0:16:15.600 --> 0:16:18.920
<v Speaker 1>So I would say anti trust, anti trust progress has

0:16:19.040 --> 0:16:21.760
<v Speaker 1>always been the focus. So Right now is waiting on

0:16:21.880 --> 0:16:25.800
<v Speaker 1>the approval from FTC, but also it's facing the probe

0:16:26.200 --> 0:16:29.640
<v Speaker 1>under u k C, m A and European Commission. So

0:16:29.880 --> 0:16:33.000
<v Speaker 1>regulators have raised a concern you or if they're still

0:16:33.160 --> 0:16:36.120
<v Speaker 1>combining the numbers three and number five largest player in

0:16:36.160 --> 0:16:39.640
<v Speaker 1>the industry, will give Microsoft, you know, too much of

0:16:39.760 --> 0:16:43.080
<v Speaker 1>advantage in a space, or if they well with whole

0:16:43.320 --> 0:16:48.440
<v Speaker 1>popular titles against their competitors, and I will say another

0:16:48.520 --> 0:16:52.240
<v Speaker 1>thing to watch, it's just more broadly um FTC or

0:16:52.280 --> 0:16:57.000
<v Speaker 1>the buider administration has been helped this very aggressive narratives

0:16:57.120 --> 0:17:01.280
<v Speaker 1>around big players all years of you know when it

0:17:01.360 --> 0:17:04.399
<v Speaker 1>comes to antitrust issue. So that's particular of putting this

0:17:04.720 --> 0:17:08.960
<v Speaker 1>mega tag deal under the spotline. What's interesting though today

0:17:09.240 --> 0:17:11.920
<v Speaker 1>are great colleagues of Breenberg Intelligence put out a piece

0:17:12.000 --> 0:17:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Jennifer for example, talking about how actually Microsoft snow uh

0:17:17.560 --> 0:17:19.320
<v Speaker 1>new one trippony when it comes to M and A.

0:17:19.400 --> 0:17:21.840
<v Speaker 1>They've been on this rodeo before and quite often they

0:17:21.960 --> 0:17:24.800
<v Speaker 1>make concessions. Are we likely to see that when the

0:17:24.920 --> 0:17:27.800
<v Speaker 1>obs are talking about this right right? I think that's

0:17:27.840 --> 0:17:30.639
<v Speaker 1>definitely something people are watching, and people are watching. The

0:17:30.760 --> 0:17:35.399
<v Speaker 1>next catalyst is UM. When FTC going to job um

0:17:35.560 --> 0:17:39.200
<v Speaker 1>their final decision on a case on this deal. So

0:17:39.520 --> 0:17:42.000
<v Speaker 1>I think media reports say that could come, you know,

0:17:42.200 --> 0:17:47.280
<v Speaker 1>either later next month or earlier next year. So it

0:17:47.400 --> 0:17:50.040
<v Speaker 1>will depend on if they offer so on the mergial

0:17:50.080 --> 0:17:53.080
<v Speaker 1>party side, if they offer some behavior remedy. But if

0:17:53.160 --> 0:17:56.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, the regulator accepts that, and if there's actually

0:17:56.600 --> 0:18:00.320
<v Speaker 1>FTC decided to block the deal, then Microstofts do have

0:18:00.520 --> 0:18:03.040
<v Speaker 1>the option too. It could appeal the case in the

0:18:03.200 --> 0:18:07.280
<v Speaker 1>court and remembers there's a similar case between United House

0:18:07.320 --> 0:18:11.520
<v Speaker 1>and chance Housecare Right. They got challenged from the o J,

0:18:11.840 --> 0:18:15.560
<v Speaker 1>but eventually win the costs approval on it so that

0:18:15.680 --> 0:18:18.760
<v Speaker 1>they are eventually close out. Okay, thanks to Bloom Bang

0:18:18.840 --> 0:18:29.879
<v Speaker 1>Bloom Bags sen two and a half years ago, we

0:18:30.040 --> 0:18:34.120
<v Speaker 1>lost eighty percent of our business. We laid off employees,

0:18:34.600 --> 0:18:36.600
<v Speaker 1>and I said at that time that we are going

0:18:36.640 --> 0:18:39.600
<v Speaker 1>to be now prepared for anything to come. We don't

0:18:40.520 --> 0:18:42.920
<v Speaker 1>need to lay off half the workforce to achieve the

0:18:42.960 --> 0:18:45.880
<v Speaker 1>efficiency levels that we want to achieve. We did announce

0:18:45.880 --> 0:18:49.680
<v Speaker 1>a small restructuring. Ours is really about rebalancing the number

0:18:49.720 --> 0:18:51.200
<v Speaker 1>of head count we had at the beginning of the

0:18:51.280 --> 0:18:53.280
<v Speaker 1>year we had tonight. We're gonna have the same number

0:18:53.280 --> 0:18:54.960
<v Speaker 1>of heads at the end of the year. We are

0:18:55.040 --> 0:18:57.280
<v Speaker 1>not stepping on the brakes. In fact, we're stepping on

0:18:57.359 --> 0:18:59.880
<v Speaker 1>the gas. We are still hiring. We're not freezing, we're

0:18:59.880 --> 0:19:04.639
<v Speaker 1>not cutting, We're growing. That's what some of the biggest

0:19:04.680 --> 0:19:07.200
<v Speaker 1>tech ceo has had to say about their own strategies

0:19:07.480 --> 0:19:10.560
<v Speaker 1>surrounding layoffs, and in today's Talking Tech, we're taking a

0:19:10.600 --> 0:19:13.399
<v Speaker 1>look at those companies that are not well so optimistic.

0:19:13.760 --> 0:19:16.760
<v Speaker 1>In Mexico used cars startup Cavac is the latest global

0:19:16.800 --> 0:19:20.320
<v Speaker 1>tech name to cut jobs. Latin America's biggest startup is

0:19:20.440 --> 0:19:23.920
<v Speaker 1>reducing headcount and firing managers due to higher interest rates

0:19:24.119 --> 0:19:26.920
<v Speaker 1>and a slowing economy. That's according to a memo from

0:19:26.920 --> 0:19:30.920
<v Speaker 1>the Unicorns CEO seen by Bloomberg News Now last week,

0:19:31.119 --> 0:19:33.240
<v Speaker 1>HP said it would cut as many as six thousand

0:19:33.359 --> 0:19:36.520
<v Speaker 1>jobs over the next three years, joining names like Amazon

0:19:36.800 --> 0:19:41.520
<v Speaker 1>and Cisco who also planned layoffs right now. Employment historically

0:19:41.600 --> 0:19:44.560
<v Speaker 1>strong globally. The jobless rate was at four point four

0:19:44.600 --> 0:19:48.520
<v Speaker 1>percent in September across major developed economies, according to the

0:19:48.600 --> 0:19:50.920
<v Speaker 1>o e c D. That's the lowest level since the

0:19:51.000 --> 0:19:54.880
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighties. But this time around, tech already has staffing

0:19:54.960 --> 0:19:58.639
<v Speaker 1>numbers way above pre pandemic levels. Layoffs have already begune,

0:19:58.960 --> 0:20:01.480
<v Speaker 1>so the sectors bray sing for more cuts to come.

0:20:01.680 --> 0:20:04.920
<v Speaker 1>That's talking to really great global perspective. Let's get a

0:20:04.960 --> 0:20:07.080
<v Speaker 1>little bit more global right now. Another story that's keeping

0:20:07.480 --> 0:20:10.080
<v Speaker 1>our attention. The main privacy watchdog for Meta in the

0:20:10.160 --> 0:20:13.400
<v Speaker 1>European Union has fined Facebook's parent company to want seventy

0:20:13.400 --> 0:20:16.200
<v Speaker 1>seven million dollars from a massive data breach. Now Matter

0:20:16.440 --> 0:20:18.760
<v Speaker 1>was penalized for failing to prevent the leak of the

0:20:18.840 --> 0:20:21.240
<v Speaker 1>personal data of more than half a billion users. The

0:20:21.320 --> 0:20:25.760
<v Speaker 1>fine was imposed by the Irish Data Protection Commission. Meanwhile,

0:20:25.800 --> 0:20:28.840
<v Speaker 1>coming up, what retail data can reveal about the state

0:20:28.880 --> 0:20:31.479
<v Speaker 1>of the supply chain in this holiday shopping season. All

0:20:31.560 --> 0:20:34.560
<v Speaker 1>these insights and more. Next some Ari Trasda. He's the

0:20:34.640 --> 0:20:36.760
<v Speaker 1>CEO and founder of the open data supply chain company.

0:20:36.880 --> 0:20:54.119
<v Speaker 1>Chris this is Bloomberg. I think this intentionality actually is

0:20:54.240 --> 0:20:56.919
<v Speaker 1>incredibly indicative of the state of the consumer. Consumers are

0:20:57.000 --> 0:20:59.280
<v Speaker 1>really looking for a value right now. They're looking for quality.

0:20:59.440 --> 0:21:01.240
<v Speaker 1>They want to buy from their favorite brands, but they

0:21:01.320 --> 0:21:03.200
<v Speaker 1>want a good deal from their favorite brands, and they're

0:21:03.200 --> 0:21:06.560
<v Speaker 1>willing to wait, whether it's Cyber Black Friday or ceremony

0:21:06.640 --> 0:21:08.560
<v Speaker 1>to buy that. But that's part of it. The second

0:21:08.600 --> 0:21:10.399
<v Speaker 1>piece of it. You mentioned this Alex in your in

0:21:10.480 --> 0:21:13.080
<v Speaker 1>your opening, you talked about omni channel. This idea that

0:21:13.160 --> 0:21:16.000
<v Speaker 1>consumers want to buy whatever in whatever means that is

0:21:16.000 --> 0:21:18.560
<v Speaker 1>most communitied for them, whether that's online or offline on

0:21:18.680 --> 0:21:21.440
<v Speaker 1>social media. That is now steady state. When you add

0:21:21.520 --> 0:21:23.800
<v Speaker 1>that to direct to consumer as a business model, which

0:21:23.840 --> 0:21:26.560
<v Speaker 1>really connects the merchant and the consumer directly. I think

0:21:26.640 --> 0:21:30.520
<v Speaker 1>that's the current state of retail and it's exciting. Welcome

0:21:30.520 --> 0:21:32.719
<v Speaker 1>back to Blue Big Technology. I'm Caroline Hide in New York.

0:21:32.800 --> 0:21:36.120
<v Speaker 1>That was Shopify president Harley Finkst on Blue Bag Television

0:21:36.119 --> 0:21:38.760
<v Speaker 1>a little earlier today. And you're taking a closer look

0:21:38.840 --> 0:21:42.080
<v Speaker 1>at Shopify and other retailers post Black Friday. Just give

0:21:42.160 --> 0:21:44.760
<v Speaker 1>us the big picture. Was it good? Yeah? Yeah, well,

0:21:44.880 --> 0:21:47.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean the market seems to think it's been okay

0:21:47.440 --> 0:21:50.959
<v Speaker 1>so far. Shopify gave some prelim numbers for Black Black Friday.

0:21:51.040 --> 0:21:53.520
<v Speaker 1>The street seems bullish on those prelim numbers. There is

0:21:53.600 --> 0:21:57.120
<v Speaker 1>evidence that the consumer is taking advantage of those deals.

0:21:57.200 --> 0:21:58.639
<v Speaker 1>Some of the stocks that we've been watching are the

0:21:58.760 --> 0:22:01.920
<v Speaker 1>names that in that econor space. Amazon had a good

0:22:01.960 --> 0:22:05.200
<v Speaker 1>start Monday's session kind of fell away, but Shopify and outperformer.

0:22:05.240 --> 0:22:07.440
<v Speaker 1>A lot of names on the cell side jumping on

0:22:07.920 --> 0:22:10.800
<v Speaker 1>the early data coming out of them. Wayfair, another one

0:22:10.920 --> 0:22:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Peloton interesting. According to Adobe Analytics, it really was a

0:22:14.080 --> 0:22:16.959
<v Speaker 1>fit at home fitness equipment that did well at one

0:22:17.000 --> 0:22:19.480
<v Speaker 1>point up eight point eight percent, but really paired those

0:22:19.560 --> 0:22:22.080
<v Speaker 1>games to close up eight tenths and one percent. Adobe

0:22:22.119 --> 0:22:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Analytics data is where I want to go. Actually, this

0:22:24.040 --> 0:22:26.520
<v Speaker 1>is a third party measure of how things are going

0:22:26.600 --> 0:22:29.800
<v Speaker 1>in this holiday shopping season. For me, the psychology about

0:22:29.920 --> 0:22:32.800
<v Speaker 1>when which they carryed you get out your laptop or

0:22:32.840 --> 0:22:35.440
<v Speaker 1>go on your smartphone and buy something. And according to

0:22:35.520 --> 0:22:38.600
<v Speaker 1>the data from Adobe Analytics, it's very much cyber Monday.

0:22:38.680 --> 0:22:41.199
<v Speaker 1>That is when across that holiday shopping period as an

0:22:41.240 --> 0:22:44.680
<v Speaker 1>individual day, they expect eleven point two billion dollars to

0:22:44.800 --> 0:22:49.119
<v Speaker 1>be spent. You look for example of Thanksgiving days comparison

0:22:49.240 --> 0:22:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Black Friday as a comparison, it seems like consumers eat

0:22:51.840 --> 0:22:54.080
<v Speaker 1>a few days to get over their Turkey trip and

0:22:54.200 --> 0:22:56.440
<v Speaker 1>get out there online to buy some deals. Now this

0:22:56.640 --> 0:22:59.000
<v Speaker 1>year related to other is let's look at two and

0:22:59.040 --> 0:23:03.400
<v Speaker 1>where we're headed. We do expect growth across that holiday

0:23:03.640 --> 0:23:06.480
<v Speaker 1>season e commerce spending in the United States. We're on

0:23:06.560 --> 0:23:10.399
<v Speaker 1>track for billion dollars. That represents two point five percent

0:23:10.520 --> 0:23:14.000
<v Speaker 1>game on the holiday season here in the United States.

0:23:14.200 --> 0:23:16.959
<v Speaker 1>But I find that fascinating carry because it's still growth

0:23:17.400 --> 0:23:19.920
<v Speaker 1>at a time where we're really worried about a slowdown

0:23:19.960 --> 0:23:22.440
<v Speaker 1>in the economy. We're worried about the strength of the consumer.

0:23:22.480 --> 0:23:25.360
<v Speaker 1>And what I'm reading in the data is actually discounting

0:23:25.600 --> 0:23:27.960
<v Speaker 1>and deals seems to be doing the trick, albeit not

0:23:28.080 --> 0:23:30.320
<v Speaker 1>in the same way it's done in previous years. Is

0:23:30.359 --> 0:23:33.879
<v Speaker 1>it inflation adjusted? That's my key question. Let's put it

0:23:34.000 --> 0:23:36.840
<v Speaker 1>to our transdell at a great setup, and we've now

0:23:36.880 --> 0:23:38.440
<v Speaker 1>got the CEO and founder of christ with Us who

0:23:38.440 --> 0:23:40.800
<v Speaker 1>can enlighten us as to the supply chain data the

0:23:40.880 --> 0:23:44.160
<v Speaker 1>platform that he brings for brands, for distributors, for retailers,

0:23:44.200 --> 0:23:46.840
<v Speaker 1>you really give them an inside track on what's happening

0:23:46.880 --> 0:23:48.560
<v Speaker 1>in terms of their own supply chain how to make

0:23:48.600 --> 0:23:50.960
<v Speaker 1>a more efficientary. But just go back to that data.

0:23:51.040 --> 0:23:54.399
<v Speaker 1>The growth are we seeing on an inflation adjusted basis

0:23:54.840 --> 0:23:57.680
<v Speaker 1>growth in terms of spending? Does it look healthy? It

0:23:57.800 --> 0:23:59.680
<v Speaker 1>looks healthier, but I think it was. At the same time,

0:24:00.240 --> 0:24:03.560
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of supply chain challenges still looming, so

0:24:03.960 --> 0:24:06.560
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing it's kind of a paradox because you're seeing

0:24:06.960 --> 0:24:11.000
<v Speaker 1>on one hand, you're seeing that retailers are reporting that

0:24:11.119 --> 0:24:13.880
<v Speaker 1>they have too much inventory and at the same time

0:24:13.960 --> 0:24:17.600
<v Speaker 1>they're reporting that they're out of stock. Um So retail

0:24:17.760 --> 0:24:21.800
<v Speaker 1>is highly seasonal, as you know, and retailers are still

0:24:21.880 --> 0:24:25.440
<v Speaker 1>struggling with getting the last season and the season before

0:24:25.520 --> 0:24:28.480
<v Speaker 1>that sold, and at the same time they have a

0:24:28.560 --> 0:24:32.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of supply chain challenges getting the seasonal products in

0:24:32.920 --> 0:24:37.000
<v Speaker 1>for for this upcoming upcoming period. Aria hear you a

0:24:37.119 --> 0:24:40.480
<v Speaker 1>lot on the supply chain challenge side, and when we

0:24:40.560 --> 0:24:43.119
<v Speaker 1>talk about supply chains for Caroline and I over the

0:24:43.240 --> 0:24:47.199
<v Speaker 1>last eighteen months, that's meant difficulty in moving goods from

0:24:47.240 --> 0:24:49.000
<v Speaker 1>A to B. But the other issue we hear about

0:24:49.080 --> 0:24:52.760
<v Speaker 1>is inventories. What roller inventories playing for some of these

0:24:53.040 --> 0:24:57.000
<v Speaker 1>online retailers this holiday season. Yeah, they it's the same,

0:24:57.240 --> 0:24:59.480
<v Speaker 1>it's the same challenge. Really, you kind of have a

0:24:59.680 --> 0:25:02.480
<v Speaker 1>very long supply chain to get get get get the

0:25:02.520 --> 0:25:06.919
<v Speaker 1>inventory to the consumer. So you have retailers, you have distributors, wholesalers,

0:25:06.960 --> 0:25:10.560
<v Speaker 1>your manufacturers, imports, exporters, etcetera. And it takes a very

0:25:10.680 --> 0:25:13.480
<v Speaker 1>long time for this inventory to actually get through this

0:25:13.720 --> 0:25:17.680
<v Speaker 1>entire supply chain. So the numbers that we've got a

0:25:17.760 --> 0:25:21.400
<v Speaker 1>few days ago here is that of the retailers say

0:25:21.440 --> 0:25:24.960
<v Speaker 1>that they have too much inventory, and at the same time,

0:25:25.119 --> 0:25:28.000
<v Speaker 1>the eight percent say that they're already starting to run

0:25:28.080 --> 0:25:32.719
<v Speaker 1>out of inventory for key items. So historically it's been

0:25:32.840 --> 0:25:35.480
<v Speaker 1>very easy to plan, a much easier to plan, but

0:25:35.920 --> 0:25:38.600
<v Speaker 1>everything that's going on now with with with the inflation,

0:25:38.680 --> 0:25:42.440
<v Speaker 1>consumer change, a huge shift to to to online for instance,

0:25:42.440 --> 0:25:45.199
<v Speaker 1>it's made it really hard to plan because of very

0:25:45.240 --> 0:25:48.240
<v Speaker 1>long lead times in the supply chains. So so that

0:25:48.400 --> 0:25:51.000
<v Speaker 1>makes it hard when everything is not real time. Sorry,

0:25:51.040 --> 0:25:52.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to ask you to talk your book here

0:25:52.600 --> 0:25:54.920
<v Speaker 1>so it don't go too much when you're talking about it.

0:25:55.040 --> 0:25:57.840
<v Speaker 1>But let's think about the companies that have managed them

0:25:57.920 --> 0:26:00.760
<v Speaker 1>interventories pretty well. Macy's is one of them. And actually, again,

0:26:00.800 --> 0:26:04.720
<v Speaker 1>this is a company that's invested a lot in technology,

0:26:05.080 --> 0:26:06.879
<v Speaker 1>in the ability to ensure that they've got the right

0:26:06.920 --> 0:26:08.119
<v Speaker 1>thing in the right time and be able to be

0:26:08.160 --> 0:26:10.439
<v Speaker 1>a bit swifter about getting the things that are going

0:26:10.520 --> 0:26:13.160
<v Speaker 1>to sell in the door. Talk to us about how

0:26:13.320 --> 0:26:16.800
<v Speaker 1>your technology is perhaps helping alleviate some of the supply

0:26:16.960 --> 0:26:20.080
<v Speaker 1>chain headaches that have been such an hallmark. And basically

0:26:20.160 --> 0:26:23.439
<v Speaker 1>every e commerce and what bricks and mortar store at

0:26:23.480 --> 0:26:26.119
<v Speaker 1>the moment, right yeah, before the pandemic, everybody thought we

0:26:26.160 --> 0:26:29.400
<v Speaker 1>could push button today and tomorrow the the product would

0:26:29.400 --> 0:26:33.280
<v Speaker 1>show up, and in reality you really need them to

0:26:33.320 --> 0:26:36.600
<v Speaker 1>premendous amount of data between the different trading partners. So

0:26:37.040 --> 0:26:39.920
<v Speaker 1>where we started in food, food that there are over

0:26:40.040 --> 0:26:43.600
<v Speaker 1>ten million companies involved in getting food from where it's

0:26:43.600 --> 0:26:47.359
<v Speaker 1>produced to where it's consumed. But the technology that actually

0:26:47.440 --> 0:26:50.480
<v Speaker 1>is connecting all of this is based upon something was

0:26:50.520 --> 0:26:53.080
<v Speaker 1>invented in three year I was portnant, which is called

0:26:53.240 --> 0:26:56.600
<v Speaker 1>d I and it's very reactive in terms of curtures

0:26:56.680 --> 0:26:59.960
<v Speaker 1>orders that go through the whole supply chain. So everybody's

0:27:00.000 --> 0:27:01.880
<v Speaker 1>with the supply chain need to have reused time data

0:27:02.000 --> 0:27:04.600
<v Speaker 1>to understand what consumers are doing, what the prices, how

0:27:04.680 --> 0:27:07.440
<v Speaker 1>much inventory exists. So everybody through the whole supply chain

0:27:07.720 --> 0:27:10.800
<v Speaker 1>can have used time data and then we avoid these

0:27:11.200 --> 0:27:16.920
<v Speaker 1>huge overstocks that we've seen and also the shortages. That's

0:27:17.000 --> 0:27:20.760
<v Speaker 1>interesting to me because you're talking about the company controlling

0:27:20.800 --> 0:27:23.920
<v Speaker 1>what it can control, but how do you control the consumer.

0:27:24.000 --> 0:27:28.240
<v Speaker 1>We went into this period knowing that promotions would be key.

0:27:28.720 --> 0:27:30.800
<v Speaker 1>We knew that they would be greater than last year.

0:27:30.840 --> 0:27:33.439
<v Speaker 1>I think the data shows US promotions were greater than

0:27:33.520 --> 0:27:37.280
<v Speaker 1>last year. What's your analysis of the role that discounts

0:27:37.320 --> 0:27:39.760
<v Speaker 1>played for the online retailers. I think this kind of

0:27:39.800 --> 0:27:44.080
<v Speaker 1>something incredively important, but I think very often blunt instruments

0:27:44.160 --> 0:27:49.399
<v Speaker 1>are used when you can have surgical precision instead and uh,

0:27:50.040 --> 0:27:52.040
<v Speaker 1>in order to do surgical precision, you really need to

0:27:52.160 --> 0:27:55.480
<v Speaker 1>understand what store is the product selling in, what's price point,

0:27:55.800 --> 0:28:00.480
<v Speaker 1>how inflation sensitive is that particular area, So the discounting

0:28:01.160 --> 0:28:04.400
<v Speaker 1>can be much more precise in a way. Some care

0:28:04.520 --> 0:28:07.960
<v Speaker 1>more about about price and others, but you have to

0:28:08.000 --> 0:28:10.600
<v Speaker 1>have really granular data now to the skew and to

0:28:10.720 --> 0:28:13.920
<v Speaker 1>the store level, and also understand inventory levels and pricing

0:28:13.960 --> 0:28:17.920
<v Speaker 1>and what competitors are doing. So I thinks, see, historically

0:28:18.000 --> 0:28:20.920
<v Speaker 1>we've seen a lot of kind of plant instruments being

0:28:21.040 --> 0:28:24.120
<v Speaker 1>used and you can have for a very little affordable price.

0:28:24.200 --> 0:28:27.240
<v Speaker 1>You can use surgical data instead to to optimize it.

0:28:27.480 --> 0:28:30.119
<v Speaker 1>To us about how that really works, and say you

0:28:30.280 --> 0:28:32.760
<v Speaker 1>realize that a lot more shop is wanting a particular

0:28:32.840 --> 0:28:36.520
<v Speaker 1>item in Brooklyn, Visa VI, what's happening in Minnesota? And

0:28:36.600 --> 0:28:38.800
<v Speaker 1>you can therefore have a cheaper price point. But with

0:28:38.920 --> 0:28:40.600
<v Speaker 1>the e commerce being so prevalent, the fact that I

0:28:40.680 --> 0:28:42.400
<v Speaker 1>can while I'm in the store pick up my phone

0:28:42.400 --> 0:28:45.360
<v Speaker 1>and decide whether this is the price point I want

0:28:45.360 --> 0:28:46.760
<v Speaker 1>to pay out, whether I can wait a couple of

0:28:46.840 --> 0:28:49.800
<v Speaker 1>days and get it cheaper, how do you manage that

0:28:49.960 --> 0:28:53.040
<v Speaker 1>amount of data the consumer has? Yeah, no, you have

0:28:53.120 --> 0:28:55.840
<v Speaker 1>to put together all of the consumer data. There, data

0:28:55.920 --> 0:28:59.040
<v Speaker 1>that the retailer have, the distributor have, and the whole

0:28:59.080 --> 0:29:02.600
<v Speaker 1>supply chain in one kind of north star. In terms

0:29:02.640 --> 0:29:07.120
<v Speaker 1>of data understanding, very many just look at their own data,

0:29:07.240 --> 0:29:10.440
<v Speaker 1>but they are part of a big ecosystem of of

0:29:10.880 --> 0:29:14.040
<v Speaker 1>of companies that all need need the data. So that

0:29:14.280 --> 0:29:17.440
<v Speaker 1>the sharing of data cross companies was something that didn't

0:29:17.480 --> 0:29:21.560
<v Speaker 1>happen as much before the pandemic, but kind of operated

0:29:21.600 --> 0:29:25.480
<v Speaker 1>in their own silo. But now people see that sharing

0:29:25.640 --> 0:29:28.760
<v Speaker 1>data matters a lot because then the manufacturer can be

0:29:28.880 --> 0:29:32.360
<v Speaker 1>ahead of it. They can when build their products and

0:29:32.440 --> 0:29:35.280
<v Speaker 1>they can get the products out in in time. Now

0:29:35.360 --> 0:29:38.840
<v Speaker 1>the returns about tremendous amount of products sitting that was

0:29:38.920 --> 0:29:43.120
<v Speaker 1>for the last last season, So getting there in time,

0:29:43.800 --> 0:29:50.080
<v Speaker 1>that's when that's that's incredibly important. It's novembery give us

0:29:50.120 --> 0:29:54.560
<v Speaker 1>the rich steal outlook for the rest of the holiday season,

0:29:54.600 --> 0:29:58.480
<v Speaker 1>which seems to go on indefinitely. That's always Aliday season,

0:29:58.480 --> 0:30:00.880
<v Speaker 1>the season in retail, which is which is incredible. So

0:30:01.400 --> 0:30:05.240
<v Speaker 1>I I think we're gonna Scostico see continued spend in

0:30:05.840 --> 0:30:10.920
<v Speaker 1>in two four six seven eight percent increase in spending

0:30:10.960 --> 0:30:13.240
<v Speaker 1>two four. I still think we're gonna see a lot

0:30:13.320 --> 0:30:16.680
<v Speaker 1>of price reductions UM, and we're going to see a

0:30:16.720 --> 0:30:19.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of shortage, shortage of products. I think a lot

0:30:19.320 --> 0:30:22.880
<v Speaker 1>of people are gonna realize that the supply chain crisis

0:30:23.000 --> 0:30:25.800
<v Speaker 1>are are not over UM and that is going to

0:30:25.840 --> 0:30:29.520
<v Speaker 1>continue kind of to ripple through the supply chain. All Right,

0:30:29.640 --> 0:30:32.840
<v Speaker 1>our h Hostile CEO and founder of Chris thank you.

0:30:44.960 --> 0:30:48.400
<v Speaker 1>We see the same confidence and the full confidence in

0:30:48.480 --> 0:30:50.400
<v Speaker 1>point based that we've seen previously, and we do not

0:30:50.520 --> 0:30:54.400
<v Speaker 1>see anybody leaving the space. And that said, given that

0:30:55.160 --> 0:30:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Inmia and when I mean in Meda, I not only

0:30:57.720 --> 0:31:01.120
<v Speaker 1>mean the European Union with the MIKA regular but also

0:31:01.240 --> 0:31:05.000
<v Speaker 1>the Financial Services and Markets build a passing through the

0:31:05.160 --> 0:31:08.240
<v Speaker 1>UK Parliament at the moment, as well as the creation

0:31:08.400 --> 0:31:12.000
<v Speaker 1>of the VARA, the Virtual Asset Regulatory Authority in Dubai

0:31:12.560 --> 0:31:16.720
<v Speaker 1>is really leading the charge in creating regulatory clarity and

0:31:16.840 --> 0:31:21.840
<v Speaker 1>a regulatory framework that we can work within. Daniel see

0:31:21.880 --> 0:31:24.080
<v Speaker 1>for their m e a, Vice President managing director of

0:31:24.120 --> 0:31:27.040
<v Speaker 1>coin Base. Now let's talk about confidence more broadly in

0:31:27.120 --> 0:31:30.560
<v Speaker 1>the space, particularly after today's perhaps inevitable news the block

0:31:30.640 --> 0:31:33.719
<v Speaker 1>fires finally had to file for bankruptcy joining us now

0:31:33.760 --> 0:31:36.160
<v Speaker 1>has been in motion basa, can I say finally because

0:31:36.600 --> 0:31:39.440
<v Speaker 1>it was anticipated because the White Knight had been the

0:31:39.520 --> 0:31:42.680
<v Speaker 1>now bankrupt FTX for them previously. We have been expecting

0:31:42.680 --> 0:31:44.880
<v Speaker 1>a filing and reporting now for at least a week

0:31:44.960 --> 0:31:46.960
<v Speaker 1>here that this would be expected at some point, and

0:31:47.040 --> 0:31:49.040
<v Speaker 1>now we have some details and what do we have

0:31:49.280 --> 0:31:52.320
<v Speaker 1>from them? We have not just the plan to file

0:31:52.360 --> 0:31:55.000
<v Speaker 1>for bankruptcy in New Jersey, we have some details about

0:31:55.040 --> 0:31:58.200
<v Speaker 1>the scope of how big this bankruptcy proceeding is going

0:31:58.280 --> 0:32:00.560
<v Speaker 1>to be. So one billion to ten million dollars in

0:32:00.640 --> 0:32:05.840
<v Speaker 1>assets is the general size of black quite a large size,

0:32:05.880 --> 0:32:08.080
<v Speaker 1>but more than a hundred thousand creditors. We would have

0:32:08.120 --> 0:32:09.760
<v Speaker 1>to keep an eye on future filings to see how

0:32:09.840 --> 0:32:13.160
<v Speaker 1>many that will ultimately be. Remember f t X also

0:32:13.240 --> 0:32:15.680
<v Speaker 1>had checked that last box on their filing and found

0:32:15.720 --> 0:32:17.800
<v Speaker 1>out later that was about a million people at play

0:32:17.880 --> 0:32:19.840
<v Speaker 1>here that we're talking about. We also know that the

0:32:19.920 --> 0:32:23.480
<v Speaker 1>concentration is different among the unsecured creditor group. So what

0:32:23.720 --> 0:32:26.160
<v Speaker 1>is that exactly? It's more than seven hundred million that

0:32:26.440 --> 0:32:30.080
<v Speaker 1>is really highlighted here earmark to the trustee of different

0:32:30.160 --> 0:32:32.800
<v Speaker 1>depositors f t X itself, which we'll talk a little

0:32:32.800 --> 0:32:35.080
<v Speaker 1>more about it now. And then also you have the

0:32:35.240 --> 0:32:40.120
<v Speaker 1>sec from the remainder of them before exactly. So there

0:32:40.120 --> 0:32:41.800
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of names that you don't have here

0:32:41.880 --> 0:32:44.360
<v Speaker 1>similar to f t X. But you know that those

0:32:44.560 --> 0:32:47.400
<v Speaker 1>amounts are kind of isolated here between one million and

0:32:47.480 --> 0:32:50.480
<v Speaker 1>thirty million dollars. So you might see more contagion there

0:32:50.560 --> 0:32:53.640
<v Speaker 1>among the people that they're owed money too, because you

0:32:53.680 --> 0:32:55.480
<v Speaker 1>don't know what they'll get back yet, but we know

0:32:55.760 --> 0:32:59.160
<v Speaker 1>that that is the general size of per per customer

0:32:59.240 --> 0:33:02.640
<v Speaker 1>per creditor that has owed money and how much generally

0:33:02.680 --> 0:33:07.280
<v Speaker 1>their own. There's a question of chronology and timeline because

0:33:07.440 --> 0:33:11.560
<v Speaker 1>it's clear Block five had issues before f t x

0:33:11.720 --> 0:33:14.480
<v Speaker 1>is collapse, but at the same time f t x

0:33:14.600 --> 0:33:17.560
<v Speaker 1>is collapse seems to have made things worse for Block

0:33:17.640 --> 0:33:20.680
<v Speaker 1>fi um if you follow that sonale, what is the

0:33:20.760 --> 0:33:24.600
<v Speaker 1>relationship now between the two? The claim here on the

0:33:24.760 --> 0:33:28.080
<v Speaker 1>bankruptcy filing is about two seventy five million dollars for

0:33:28.320 --> 0:33:31.920
<v Speaker 1>f t X earmarked. There's some really interesting unanswered questions here.

0:33:32.080 --> 0:33:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Ed if you look at the testimony by an advisor here,

0:33:35.720 --> 0:33:38.720
<v Speaker 1>you had seen that they didn't get money. They didn't

0:33:38.720 --> 0:33:40.360
<v Speaker 1>get all the money that they had asked for from

0:33:40.440 --> 0:33:42.520
<v Speaker 1>f t X to begin with, according to the Block

0:33:42.600 --> 0:33:45.640
<v Speaker 1>five filings. Now remember to your points, some of these

0:33:45.680 --> 0:33:47.720
<v Speaker 1>issues started before f t X. That's why f t

0:33:47.960 --> 0:33:49.840
<v Speaker 1>X got involved in the first place. They were related

0:33:49.880 --> 0:33:53.240
<v Speaker 1>to three Arrows in ft x is filing. I would

0:33:53.440 --> 0:33:56.480
<v Speaker 1>also point out that apparently the US business of f

0:33:56.640 --> 0:34:00.360
<v Speaker 1>t X lent money to block FI in part through

0:34:00.480 --> 0:34:04.200
<v Speaker 1>that ft t token. And so my question here is

0:34:04.480 --> 0:34:08.440
<v Speaker 1>this entire agreement, who owes who what and who is

0:34:08.480 --> 0:34:12.680
<v Speaker 1>responsible for actually paying each other back after this kind

0:34:12.719 --> 0:34:17.680
<v Speaker 1>of tight web that needed knitted after the three Arrows debacle,

0:34:17.920 --> 0:34:21.160
<v Speaker 1>I think is interesting. Now, remember blockedby is also said

0:34:21.280 --> 0:34:24.399
<v Speaker 1>that getting money back from f t X might take

0:34:24.440 --> 0:34:26.800
<v Speaker 1>time give an f t x is own bankruptcy. So

0:34:27.120 --> 0:34:31.920
<v Speaker 1>things are certainly complicated between the two Shinali. Over the weekend,

0:34:32.560 --> 0:34:35.160
<v Speaker 1>it looked as though much of crypto twittersho decided to

0:34:35.280 --> 0:34:37.680
<v Speaker 1>up sticks and leave to the Bahamas at some point

0:34:37.719 --> 0:34:39.799
<v Speaker 1>into their own digging in some way, shape or form.

0:34:40.080 --> 0:34:42.680
<v Speaker 1>That is, because of the different jurisdictions with which ft

0:34:42.880 --> 0:34:45.160
<v Speaker 1>X has been enveloped the same thing he will block

0:34:45.200 --> 0:34:47.759
<v Speaker 1>five bit. Obviously, Chapter eleven isn't as a protection here

0:34:47.800 --> 0:34:50.000
<v Speaker 1>in the US, but it wasn't just based in the US.

0:34:50.160 --> 0:34:52.839
<v Speaker 1>I spent an inordinate amount of time with Bankruptcy US

0:34:52.960 --> 0:34:55.560
<v Speaker 1>today for that reason because it to that end they

0:34:55.719 --> 0:34:58.120
<v Speaker 1>had many people that win shine truly in this case,

0:34:58.239 --> 0:34:59.839
<v Speaker 1>I will tell you just how much. In a moment,

0:35:00.120 --> 0:35:02.760
<v Speaker 1>for Block five, they file the petition with the Bermuda

0:35:02.760 --> 0:35:05.880
<v Speaker 1>and Supreme Court here so that they would have provisional

0:35:06.120 --> 0:35:10.080
<v Speaker 1>liquidators in both regions. Now, remember from Bahamas point of

0:35:10.120 --> 0:35:12.279
<v Speaker 1>view for f t X, there is a lot of

0:35:12.719 --> 0:35:16.320
<v Speaker 1>dispute that has occurred since the bankruptcy proceedings have begune

0:35:16.840 --> 0:35:18.880
<v Speaker 1>and to the point that you even have the Attorney

0:35:18.920 --> 0:35:21.759
<v Speaker 1>General saying that some of the words that have come

0:35:21.840 --> 0:35:24.360
<v Speaker 1>from the new f t X EO are regrettable. So

0:35:24.680 --> 0:35:27.520
<v Speaker 1>to the extent that the Bermuda government in the US

0:35:27.960 --> 0:35:31.160
<v Speaker 1>stay in line in this bankruptcy filing. Again, they want

0:35:31.200 --> 0:35:34.040
<v Speaker 1>to recoup money for their customers, for their own people.

0:35:34.200 --> 0:35:36.040
<v Speaker 1>And at the end of the day, what it seems

0:35:36.080 --> 0:35:38.120
<v Speaker 1>like from the statements we're seeing from the Bahamas is

0:35:38.239 --> 0:35:42.720
<v Speaker 1>also redefined the credibility of every single jurisdictions financial system

0:35:42.840 --> 0:35:47.800
<v Speaker 1>and ability to embrace crypto still but have tight rules

0:35:47.960 --> 0:35:50.320
<v Speaker 1>around the industry such that people don't lose their funds.

0:35:50.520 --> 0:35:52.400
<v Speaker 1>We go to go shnati, but you teased us how

0:35:52.480 --> 0:35:56.040
<v Speaker 1>much of the bankrupcy loise million dollars? So right for some,

0:35:57.160 --> 0:35:59.200
<v Speaker 1>we thank you so much. She's going to go back

0:35:59.200 --> 0:36:01.359
<v Speaker 1>to those bankrupcy to is now. Meanwhile, coming up, Elon

0:36:01.440 --> 0:36:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Musk picks a fight with Apple. I'll tell you why next.

0:36:04.920 --> 0:36:30.200
<v Speaker 1>This is black So today Elon Musk has once again

0:36:30.440 --> 0:36:32.880
<v Speaker 1>been going viral on his own platform and others. This

0:36:33.080 --> 0:36:35.960
<v Speaker 1>time he's stirring a fight with none other than Apple. Now.

0:36:36.080 --> 0:36:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Mask says Apple has halted most of its advertising on

0:36:39.080 --> 0:36:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Twitter and asked the company quote if they hate free

0:36:42.520 --> 0:36:45.680
<v Speaker 1>speech in America. He even appealed directly to Apple CEO,

0:36:45.960 --> 0:36:49.040
<v Speaker 1>asking what's going on here? Tim Cook. He also went

0:36:49.120 --> 0:36:52.600
<v Speaker 1>on to accuse the company threatening to remove the platform

0:36:52.680 --> 0:36:55.439
<v Speaker 1>from its app store. He did said not say why though,

0:36:55.600 --> 0:36:59.160
<v Speaker 1>And now this will comes as many companies have halted spending.

0:36:59.200 --> 0:37:01.480
<v Speaker 1>We know on it and make concerns about your mass

0:37:01.520 --> 0:37:04.440
<v Speaker 1>content moderation plans for the site watch dogs site and

0:37:04.480 --> 0:37:07.760
<v Speaker 1>fact medium Matters reported last week that half of Twitter's

0:37:07.840 --> 0:37:11.000
<v Speaker 1>top advertisers had pulled their advertising on Twitter after concerns

0:37:11.000 --> 0:37:13.200
<v Speaker 1>about the direction of Twitter Look Forward Jeep among them.

0:37:13.400 --> 0:37:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk, meanwhile, has been blaming activists for pressuring advertisers

0:37:17.200 --> 0:37:19.680
<v Speaker 1>and has talked about Twitter seeing a massive drop in

0:37:19.760 --> 0:37:22.640
<v Speaker 1>revenue already. He said in the past that he wants

0:37:22.719 --> 0:37:24.640
<v Speaker 1>to make money for Twitter by turning it into a

0:37:24.719 --> 0:37:28.080
<v Speaker 1>paid subscription service, with a relaunch of its paid verified

0:37:28.120 --> 0:37:31.000
<v Speaker 1>services due Friday, of course, but for now, the vast

0:37:31.040 --> 0:37:35.880
<v Speaker 1>majority of Twitter's revenue still comes from advertising. Ed Now,

0:37:36.040 --> 0:37:38.440
<v Speaker 1>let's stick with this story, bringing Bloomberg's Kurt Wagner, a

0:37:38.600 --> 0:37:41.640
<v Speaker 1>social media reporter, for more. I mean, Kurt, there's a

0:37:41.680 --> 0:37:46.840
<v Speaker 1>lot to unpick here. What happens if Apple took Twitter

0:37:46.920 --> 0:37:50.719
<v Speaker 1>off the app store. I guess that's the place to start, sure,

0:37:50.800 --> 0:37:53.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's a pretty dramatic outcome, right, Like this

0:37:53.480 --> 0:37:57.480
<v Speaker 1>would be that Twitter is routinely, uh, you know, allowing

0:37:58.239 --> 0:38:01.080
<v Speaker 1>terrible content on the plan from usually Apple reserves this

0:38:01.239 --> 0:38:05.600
<v Speaker 1>for you know, Gregis violations, and so if this worted

0:38:05.640 --> 0:38:07.879
<v Speaker 1>to be the case, of course, that's a huge blow

0:38:08.000 --> 0:38:11.160
<v Speaker 1>to Twitter. Right. The app store is is probably the

0:38:11.360 --> 0:38:13.600
<v Speaker 1>main way, or one of the main ways that most

0:38:13.640 --> 0:38:16.680
<v Speaker 1>of its users get the app get app updates, so

0:38:16.920 --> 0:38:18.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, for example, I believe the app would still

0:38:18.719 --> 0:38:20.360
<v Speaker 1>work on my phone, but in order to you know,

0:38:20.440 --> 0:38:23.279
<v Speaker 1>get an updated version I have an iPhone, I might

0:38:23.360 --> 0:38:25.040
<v Speaker 1>have to you know, figure out a way to download

0:38:25.080 --> 0:38:26.440
<v Speaker 1>that from the web. It's the kind of thing that's

0:38:26.440 --> 0:38:28.400
<v Speaker 1>going to erode over time and cause a lot of

0:38:28.440 --> 0:38:31.279
<v Speaker 1>people to either stop using Twitter or or you know,

0:38:31.800 --> 0:38:33.920
<v Speaker 1>possibly have to move to a different device. And so

0:38:34.480 --> 0:38:36.200
<v Speaker 1>that's a huge issue. And one of the reasons I

0:38:36.280 --> 0:38:39.200
<v Speaker 1>tweeted that I think Twitter needs Apple a lot more

0:38:39.280 --> 0:38:41.960
<v Speaker 1>than Apple needs Twitter here, and that's because Apple has

0:38:42.040 --> 0:38:44.880
<v Speaker 1>the distribution that it's at its fingertips. And actually I

0:38:45.000 --> 0:38:47.360
<v Speaker 1>was pretty surprised that Apple was one of the biggest

0:38:47.360 --> 0:38:54.040
<v Speaker 1>advertisers with Twitter cut. Meanwhile, cryptic sort of war almost

0:38:54.120 --> 0:38:57.359
<v Speaker 1>he's declared on Apple continues and talk to us about

0:38:57.400 --> 0:39:01.439
<v Speaker 1>what he means by a free sprint speech suppression. He says,

0:39:01.520 --> 0:39:04.160
<v Speaker 1>he said in a tweet, well, the Twitter falls on

0:39:04.520 --> 0:39:07.560
<v Speaker 1>free speech. This suppression will soon be published on the

0:39:07.640 --> 0:39:09.680
<v Speaker 1>social media platform. What does he mean was he going

0:39:09.760 --> 0:39:13.319
<v Speaker 1>to declare on that? Well, we don't know, but he's

0:39:13.360 --> 0:39:16.440
<v Speaker 1>certainly kind of piquing our interest, right He's saying, hey,

0:39:16.520 --> 0:39:18.759
<v Speaker 1>look now that I'm inside the building now that I've

0:39:18.800 --> 0:39:21.200
<v Speaker 1>had time to figure out, you know, what's been going

0:39:21.239 --> 0:39:24.080
<v Speaker 1>on in the code or behind the scenes. Uh, you know,

0:39:24.440 --> 0:39:27.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to kind of unveil what Twitter has been

0:39:27.160 --> 0:39:30.880
<v Speaker 1>hiding from you this whole time, right and and presumably, um,

0:39:30.960 --> 0:39:32.560
<v Speaker 1>the way I'm reading that is that means he's going

0:39:32.640 --> 0:39:34.440
<v Speaker 1>to come out and say, you know, here are the

0:39:34.680 --> 0:39:37.760
<v Speaker 1>types of tweets that maybe we're down ranked in the algorithm,

0:39:37.880 --> 0:39:40.080
<v Speaker 1>or here's the types of accounts that had been removed

0:39:40.200 --> 0:39:43.080
<v Speaker 1>that maybe you didn't know about. Again, this is speculation, right,

0:39:43.120 --> 0:39:47.320
<v Speaker 1>because he's intentionally sort of building this drama there. But again,

0:39:47.640 --> 0:39:49.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, what he has tried to say all along

0:39:49.840 --> 0:39:53.440
<v Speaker 1>is that he is this free speech uh kind of evangelist,

0:39:53.480 --> 0:39:55.440
<v Speaker 1>and he's gonna come in and he's going to make

0:39:55.520 --> 0:39:58.239
<v Speaker 1>Twitter the free speech version of the service that people

0:39:58.280 --> 0:40:00.160
<v Speaker 1>wanted to be. That it has not been be as

0:40:00.200 --> 0:40:02.200
<v Speaker 1>it has you know, rules around what you can and

0:40:02.280 --> 0:40:07.240
<v Speaker 1>cannot say. We know the new look verification systems coming Friday,

0:40:07.600 --> 0:40:11.719
<v Speaker 1>what has must said? What are the details? Yeah, well

0:40:11.800 --> 0:40:13.560
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned and I think we talked about this and

0:40:13.760 --> 0:40:16.000
<v Speaker 1>actually on spaces on Friday when we were there, that

0:40:16.080 --> 0:40:19.080
<v Speaker 1>there's going to be a series of different colored badges, right,

0:40:19.160 --> 0:40:21.359
<v Speaker 1>at least that's the plan for now, and I'm I'm

0:40:21.400 --> 0:40:23.080
<v Speaker 1>going to forget the colors off the top of my head.

0:40:23.120 --> 0:40:25.879
<v Speaker 1>But presumably you know, uh, you might have one color

0:40:25.920 --> 0:40:27.800
<v Speaker 1>if you are an elected official. You might have another

0:40:27.840 --> 0:40:31.000
<v Speaker 1>color if you are a brand, or if you're running

0:40:31.080 --> 0:40:33.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of an account that's representing you know, a company

0:40:34.000 --> 0:40:37.480
<v Speaker 1>versus an individual person. Right, And so this is actually

0:40:37.520 --> 0:40:40.160
<v Speaker 1>not a new idea. This is something that folks have

0:40:40.760 --> 0:40:43.160
<v Speaker 1>inside Twitter have kicked around for a long time before

0:40:43.239 --> 0:40:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Elon showed up, this idea that maybe there should be

0:40:46.040 --> 0:40:49.040
<v Speaker 1>different kind of labels for different accounts, including one for bots.

0:40:49.080 --> 0:40:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Believe it or not, there was an idea that, you know,

0:40:51.600 --> 0:40:53.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe bots should exist on Twitter, but they should be

0:40:53.719 --> 0:40:56.360
<v Speaker 1>labeled as bots that you know, you're interacting with a

0:40:56.480 --> 0:40:59.239
<v Speaker 1>kind of an automated account. So, as you know, Ed

0:40:59.280 --> 0:41:03.040
<v Speaker 1>and Caroline, this plan for verification has changed almost daily

0:41:03.160 --> 0:41:05.279
<v Speaker 1>from the last couple of weeks. So we'll see what

0:41:05.440 --> 0:41:07.480
<v Speaker 1>it looks like when we actually see it live. But

0:41:07.560 --> 0:41:09.200
<v Speaker 1>as of now, you know, it seems to be that

0:41:09.280 --> 0:41:11.560
<v Speaker 1>you're starting to get a little bit more strategic around

0:41:11.920 --> 0:41:13.839
<v Speaker 1>um instead of everyone gets the blue check. There's going

0:41:13.880 --> 0:41:17.040
<v Speaker 1>to be different variations of that green, gold, blue. We

0:41:17.160 --> 0:41:18.560
<v Speaker 1>wait to see what the rainbow is going to be. Like,

0:41:19.200 --> 0:41:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Kurt Wagner, so great that you join us on spaces.

0:41:21.760 --> 0:41:23.160
<v Speaker 1>That was a nice little tea. You've gotta come and

0:41:23.239 --> 0:41:26.959
<v Speaker 1>join us on Friday, Twitter Spaces and indeed then digging

0:41:26.960 --> 0:41:28.640
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more on what's happening. I'm sure there's

0:41:28.640 --> 0:41:31.200
<v Speaker 1>going to be plenty to discuss come Friday. It's only Monday, Kurt.

0:41:31.239 --> 0:41:32.640
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna let you get back to your day job,

0:41:32.680 --> 0:41:35.480
<v Speaker 1>which is tracking what the cryptic tweet doesn't even mean,

0:41:35.640 --> 0:41:38.720
<v Speaker 1>but and it really is a story that continues to unfold.

0:41:38.800 --> 0:41:41.360
<v Speaker 1>And the fact that you know, Musque, Yes, the wealthiest

0:41:41.360 --> 0:41:44.920
<v Speaker 1>individual is taking on Apple and almost retweeting out there

0:41:45.040 --> 0:41:48.320
<v Speaker 1>what some of the videos the Epic Games made about

0:41:48.440 --> 0:41:52.319
<v Speaker 1>Apple's business practices. It really does feel like he's going

0:41:52.400 --> 0:41:55.800
<v Speaker 1>for them. It's gold check for companies, great check for government,

0:41:55.840 --> 0:41:58.359
<v Speaker 1>and blue for individuals. By the way, Carrot, that does

0:41:58.400 --> 0:42:00.800
<v Speaker 1>it for this edition of Bloomberg Technology. Make sure to

0:42:00.920 --> 0:42:04.360
<v Speaker 1>join us again tomorrow. AWS c O Adams Litski joins

0:42:04.440 --> 0:42:07.000
<v Speaker 1>us as Amazon kicks off it's annual cloud conference. You

0:42:07.080 --> 0:42:09.759
<v Speaker 1>don't want to miss it. This Carrow is Bloomberg