WEBVTT - 'Top 100' debate & mailbag

0:00:01.320 --> 0:00:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Be Around the NFL Podcast. Can't fight this feeling anymore.

0:00:08.640 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to another edition of the Around the NFL Podcast.

0:00:11.720 --> 0:00:13.400
<v Speaker 1>My name is Dan Hansis and I am joined by

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:19.760
<v Speaker 1>room Field with heroes Mark Sessler, Chris Westling, and Lindsay Rhodes, who,

0:00:20.720 --> 0:00:25.600
<v Speaker 1>by the way, Smith, Ario Speedwagon not a one hit wonder?

0:00:26.360 --> 0:00:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Uh no, absolutely not. Yeah, we're talking our nineties one

0:00:29.640 --> 0:00:33.240
<v Speaker 1>hit wonders on the last show Money just delivering the

0:00:33.240 --> 0:00:37.760
<v Speaker 1>the high octave there, very impressive. Were they a one

0:00:37.840 --> 0:00:41.800
<v Speaker 1>hit wonder? Three or four big hits? Okay? Yeah? I

0:00:41.800 --> 0:00:44.680
<v Speaker 1>feel like Orio Speedwagon when I was like an elementary

0:00:44.720 --> 0:00:48.480
<v Speaker 1>school on a depressing Sunday driving around with my mom

0:00:48.520 --> 0:00:52.360
<v Speaker 1>doing Errand's obviously Ario Speedwagon on the radio. Do you

0:00:52.360 --> 0:00:58.200
<v Speaker 1>remember the movie Last American Virgin came out, but you

0:00:58.280 --> 0:01:01.440
<v Speaker 1>watch it regularly? My friends and I in high school

0:01:01.440 --> 0:01:03.640
<v Speaker 1>would watch it because it had the best soundtrack of

0:01:03.640 --> 0:01:06.280
<v Speaker 1>all time, but you could never find the soundtracks, so

0:01:06.280 --> 0:01:09.960
<v Speaker 1>it was like the mythical great sound inside by the soundtrack,

0:01:10.120 --> 0:01:13.160
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't available inside sixty seconds on West's first nine

0:01:13.800 --> 0:01:20.440
<v Speaker 1>reference early eighties references. Um, alright, great show today. Oh man,

0:01:20.480 --> 0:01:22.199
<v Speaker 1>it's so happy to have Lindsay here. I'm so happy

0:01:22.200 --> 0:01:24.240
<v Speaker 1>to have Lindsay here. Welcome back, Lindsay. How are you.

0:01:24.400 --> 0:01:28.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing really well, especially now that I'm here. I've

0:01:28.120 --> 0:01:30.440
<v Speaker 1>missed you, guys. I mean, aside from the fact that

0:01:30.480 --> 0:01:32.039
<v Speaker 1>you sit right next to me in the news room, right,

0:01:32.200 --> 0:01:34.960
<v Speaker 1>I've missed you in this environment. Very good and you

0:01:35.000 --> 0:01:38.240
<v Speaker 1>are just plowing through. The Top one is down to

0:01:38.319 --> 0:01:42.200
<v Speaker 1>the last ten now Top ten. Yeah, has been a

0:01:42.200 --> 0:01:45.000
<v Speaker 1>good experience for you. It's been fun. You've enjoyed it.

0:01:45.160 --> 0:01:47.920
<v Speaker 1>I have, I have very much. So Top ten's always

0:01:48.400 --> 0:01:50.440
<v Speaker 1>top ten. Top one is always fun for me. I

0:01:50.480 --> 0:01:52.360
<v Speaker 1>like the show. Yeah that is that is your baby.

0:01:52.400 --> 0:01:54.680
<v Speaker 1>You are really the face of the Top one, as

0:01:54.720 --> 0:01:57.120
<v Speaker 1>we talked about, which means with Lindsay here, we're gonna

0:01:57.120 --> 0:02:01.360
<v Speaker 1>get into some Top one uh more specifically, you know,

0:02:01.400 --> 0:02:03.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe some issues we have at the Top one hunder

0:02:03.080 --> 0:02:05.320
<v Speaker 1>because Lindsay, we're not now that we we all kind

0:02:05.320 --> 0:02:06.880
<v Speaker 1>of know each other a little better, now we can

0:02:06.920 --> 0:02:09.720
<v Speaker 1>tell you that there has been some issues with the

0:02:09.720 --> 0:02:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Top one in this room in the past, where people

0:02:12.880 --> 0:02:15.760
<v Speaker 1>rank and whether what kind of activity it is, and

0:02:15.840 --> 0:02:17.680
<v Speaker 1>maybe we'll dig into it a little bit. That's no

0:02:17.800 --> 0:02:21.000
<v Speaker 1>shock to me. You're it's like you're apologizing to I

0:02:21.040 --> 0:02:23.920
<v Speaker 1>didn't make the list, apologies, just you know, laying it

0:02:23.960 --> 0:02:28.160
<v Speaker 1>out there that you know maybe potentially it is a potentially.

0:02:28.200 --> 0:02:30.240
<v Speaker 1>So we're gonna talk about that. Are issues with the

0:02:30.280 --> 0:02:33.280
<v Speaker 1>top one hundred? Also, Uh, you know, as you promised,

0:02:33.560 --> 0:02:35.560
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna hit that mail bag up at the old

0:02:35.600 --> 0:02:37.760
<v Speaker 1>mail bag? Did you do a mail bag with us

0:02:37.800 --> 0:02:40.079
<v Speaker 1>last time? I can't remember. I can't remember. I don't

0:02:40.080 --> 0:02:44.160
<v Speaker 1>think so. Ye, that's exactly what we did. Very different.

0:02:45.639 --> 0:02:48.280
<v Speaker 1>It's good. That's right. Well, maybe we'll bring that back

0:02:48.320 --> 0:02:53.680
<v Speaker 1>next week. Uh uh, what's your fancy? Of course, but

0:02:53.760 --> 0:02:56.280
<v Speaker 1>not today. We're gonna do the mail bag. We're gonna

0:02:56.400 --> 0:02:59.360
<v Speaker 1>counter or back on the phone first. Now I know, Lindsay,

0:02:59.440 --> 0:03:02.040
<v Speaker 1>you have not been around for this yet. Were you

0:03:02.120 --> 0:03:06.320
<v Speaker 1>kidding me? It's a weekly segment where Connor, our New

0:03:06.360 --> 0:03:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Jersey correspondent, gets something off his chest, and that's gonna

0:03:09.960 --> 0:03:12.600
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna be part of the show today. I'm excited.

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:17.440
<v Speaker 1>Are hard hitting social topics of the day. I feel

0:03:17.440 --> 0:03:19.520
<v Speaker 1>like you just went Canadian or something on that you

0:03:19.520 --> 0:03:22.400
<v Speaker 1>have to emphasize the ore. Maybe it was that you

0:03:22.440 --> 0:03:27.079
<v Speaker 1>just sounded happier than normal, and I'm onto you ever

0:03:27.120 --> 0:03:30.880
<v Speaker 1>since West grews goatee seems a little bit happier. There's

0:03:30.880 --> 0:03:34.280
<v Speaker 1>a bounce in my step a little bit. But it's

0:03:34.280 --> 0:03:36.640
<v Speaker 1>working with the ladies. He tells me, well, that's not

0:03:36.720 --> 0:03:40.560
<v Speaker 1>exactly what I said. No, that was that was the

0:03:40.840 --> 0:03:43.600
<v Speaker 1>point of what you said. I've had more conversations with

0:03:43.640 --> 0:03:47.160
<v Speaker 1>strange women. That's I think what I said. And they

0:03:47.160 --> 0:03:49.640
<v Speaker 1>were flawed. Yes, that was my follow up question, and

0:03:49.680 --> 0:03:53.080
<v Speaker 1>he said that's a given, all right, And now we

0:03:53.120 --> 0:03:55.760
<v Speaker 1>go behind the glass. It's t D. Now let's let's

0:03:55.800 --> 0:03:58.360
<v Speaker 1>keep it real here. T D was not a part

0:03:58.360 --> 0:04:01.880
<v Speaker 1>of the show on Tuesday. No coincidence that coming after

0:04:01.920 --> 0:04:03.960
<v Speaker 1>the Thursday show where he gave us the lava mikes

0:04:03.960 --> 0:04:06.200
<v Speaker 1>and it led to a lot of technical difficulties. It

0:04:06.320 --> 0:04:08.760
<v Speaker 1>was a one show suspension, but he's back. Welcome t D.

0:04:09.160 --> 0:04:12.480
<v Speaker 1>What is going on, guys, And um, I'm appealing that suspension.

0:04:13.040 --> 0:04:16.839
<v Speaker 1>You know, I was completely doing it for the team.

0:04:16.920 --> 0:04:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Is kind of how you take a tackle injection, or

0:04:18.880 --> 0:04:20.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, you you hit a guy back from hitting

0:04:20.520 --> 0:04:22.080
<v Speaker 1>your teammate. Because I'm you know, I'm looking ahead to

0:04:22.120 --> 0:04:23.719
<v Speaker 1>the season, looking ahead of what we can be doing

0:04:23.760 --> 0:04:27.560
<v Speaker 1>as a team, the video team. Interesting strategy to appeal

0:04:27.680 --> 0:04:30.560
<v Speaker 1>the suspension after you service. It's funny you bring up

0:04:30.600 --> 0:04:33.400
<v Speaker 1>suspensions will be getting too many today we will spension.

0:04:34.080 --> 0:04:36.360
<v Speaker 1>But I also want to say that it was a

0:04:36.400 --> 0:04:39.200
<v Speaker 1>show that it didn't fight too far for the show

0:04:39.200 --> 0:04:40.600
<v Speaker 1>I would I wouldn't fight too hard to be on

0:04:40.960 --> 0:04:43.000
<v Speaker 1>because I mean that guy in Mark Sessler is back.

0:04:43.760 --> 0:04:45.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, you know, you know it always goes back

0:04:46.000 --> 0:04:51.720
<v Speaker 1>to shot smart black professionalism for roughly the entire summer,

0:04:51.839 --> 0:04:54.360
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not surprised to hear anything that you say.

0:04:54.400 --> 0:04:56.240
<v Speaker 1>I would say this. It's kind of like Jamie Fox.

0:04:56.760 --> 0:04:58.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm not a huge fan of Jamie Fox the actor.

0:04:59.000 --> 0:05:00.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm a big fan of j Me Fox the artist,

0:05:01.080 --> 0:05:03.479
<v Speaker 1>great R and B songs. Same thing with you. I

0:05:03.520 --> 0:05:07.719
<v Speaker 1>love your Instagram. It's a regular Jackson Pollock the podcaster.

0:05:08.720 --> 0:05:11.239
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, just saying, well, listen, I'm not coming

0:05:11.240 --> 0:05:15.039
<v Speaker 1>off of one game suspension for not being well. It

0:05:15.160 --> 0:05:18.440
<v Speaker 1>was not appealed. You served it and rightly, so happy

0:05:18.480 --> 0:05:20.719
<v Speaker 1>to have you back, Lindsay, do you feel the awkwardness

0:05:20.760 --> 0:05:23.200
<v Speaker 1>in the room. This is like a family busting apart

0:05:23.200 --> 0:05:24.880
<v Speaker 1>at the seems I feel like I'm a Thanksgiving All

0:05:24.880 --> 0:05:26.560
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden, I was going to say the same thing.

0:05:26.640 --> 0:05:29.400
<v Speaker 1>This reminds me of a lot of Thanksgiving dinners from

0:05:29.400 --> 0:05:31.480
<v Speaker 1>the early nineties. I'm having a good song. It's good

0:05:31.480 --> 0:05:33.039
<v Speaker 1>to be in a room with a fellow Emmy winner

0:05:33.080 --> 0:05:39.240
<v Speaker 1>like lindsay herself. For Emmy Reel, what I was wondering

0:05:39.240 --> 0:05:41.160
<v Speaker 1>where that one when that was coming in? You actually

0:05:41.320 --> 0:05:44.880
<v Speaker 1>showed some restraint before dropping. Can we just hear it again?

0:05:45.839 --> 0:05:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Click that for Emmy Reel? What? I love that he

0:05:52.560 --> 0:05:55.160
<v Speaker 1>brought up the Emmy's just so he could segue himself.

0:05:57.160 --> 0:06:00.320
<v Speaker 1>I'll wake up every morning. All right, let's do some news.

0:06:01.120 --> 0:06:02.640
<v Speaker 1>I heard about a third fight between you and a

0:06:02.720 --> 0:06:07.520
<v Speaker 1>polym behind closed doors. How do you know all this?

0:06:08.080 --> 0:06:13.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm a son, right, Neil Zeus? Is you know a

0:06:13.920 --> 0:06:17.719
<v Speaker 1>little soft spot he hit? Anything Rocky related? I'm excited

0:06:17.760 --> 0:06:21.039
<v Speaker 1>about Creed that trailer. I love me some Michael B. Jordan's.

0:06:21.279 --> 0:06:23.560
<v Speaker 1>That's if I was if I was acting, which I'm not,

0:06:23.760 --> 0:06:25.640
<v Speaker 1>but if I was there, I feel like me and

0:06:25.680 --> 0:06:28.599
<v Speaker 1>Michael B. Would be up for the same rose. God, yeah,

0:06:28.640 --> 0:06:32.839
<v Speaker 1>I could see that. I can see that abol behind

0:06:32.839 --> 0:06:36.000
<v Speaker 1>the glass. It's so funny you just said that, Denzel.

0:06:36.640 --> 0:06:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Go ahead, I want to know if that did that

0:06:39.000 --> 0:06:41.600
<v Speaker 1>clip have to do with anything that we're about to discuss,

0:06:41.680 --> 0:06:43.800
<v Speaker 1>or was that just an excuse to play a movie

0:06:43.800 --> 0:06:48.120
<v Speaker 1>clip that you enjoyed. Yes, exactly, Mark, Okay, you understands

0:06:48.120 --> 0:06:50.279
<v Speaker 1>me sometimes. But I mean it's a great trailer. Everyone's

0:06:50.279 --> 0:06:52.960
<v Speaker 1>been talking and that was probably the best part of

0:06:52.960 --> 0:06:54.960
<v Speaker 1>the trailer to me. He delivered that line so well.

0:06:54.960 --> 0:06:56.440
<v Speaker 1>It could have been cheesy, could have It's kind of

0:06:56.440 --> 0:06:59.160
<v Speaker 1>like when a movie says it's name title, I'll get

0:06:59.200 --> 0:07:01.600
<v Speaker 1>a little Rocky. Are you familiar with the franchise? I am,

0:07:01.640 --> 0:07:03.040
<v Speaker 1>I do. I do remember much of it goes to

0:07:03.080 --> 0:07:05.919
<v Speaker 1>young when I watched it. Well, the part where he

0:07:05.960 --> 0:07:07.720
<v Speaker 1>says I heard there was a fight behind the scenes.

0:07:07.839 --> 0:07:11.640
<v Speaker 1>That was at the end of Rocky three. They meet

0:07:11.720 --> 0:07:14.000
<v Speaker 1>up in the church, just Rocky and Apollo after Rocky

0:07:14.040 --> 0:07:17.040
<v Speaker 1>beats club or Lange and they The movie freeze frames

0:07:17.040 --> 0:07:19.320
<v Speaker 1>on the two of them connected, then turns into a

0:07:19.400 --> 0:07:25.000
<v Speaker 1>painted yes they lettered, Yes alright. It's like a regular

0:07:25.000 --> 0:07:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Friday night in Kevin Patrick's world. Sell, he says, this

0:07:28.080 --> 0:07:31.600
<v Speaker 1>is a start of Rocky four. What Sell? He says,

0:07:31.640 --> 0:07:34.280
<v Speaker 1>that's not not Rocky three, started Rocky four. Now they'd

0:07:34.320 --> 0:07:36.400
<v Speaker 1>redo it again in four too, but it originally happens

0:07:36.440 --> 0:07:38.280
<v Speaker 1>at three. Right, was Rocky five, the one with the

0:07:38.640 --> 0:07:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Hammer song in it? Yes? Okay, yeah, that's the less

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:47.320
<v Speaker 1>talked about that movie. We'll get into that, and we'll

0:07:47.320 --> 0:07:50.280
<v Speaker 1>get into Lindsay's pick up one hit Wonder of the

0:07:50.360 --> 0:07:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Nineties a little later on the show. But let's do

0:07:52.560 --> 0:07:54.880
<v Speaker 1>some news now, all right, we'll start. Yes, you know,

0:07:55.040 --> 0:07:56.760
<v Speaker 1>it's been very quiet this week in the news, and

0:07:56.760 --> 0:07:59.720
<v Speaker 1>we should have seen this coming because the holiday weekend,

0:08:00.600 --> 0:08:05.400
<v Speaker 1>the official NFL holiday weekend, League office wise closes on Friday's,

0:08:05.480 --> 0:08:07.040
<v Speaker 1>which means they had to dump some stuff, and they

0:08:07.080 --> 0:08:10.200
<v Speaker 1>ended up dumping four suspensions on it. So we'll go

0:08:10.280 --> 0:08:13.200
<v Speaker 1>one by one. We'll start. Let's go on descending order

0:08:13.320 --> 0:08:17.680
<v Speaker 1>of in my estimation importance and you guys could you know,

0:08:18.040 --> 0:08:20.880
<v Speaker 1>disagree with me, but we'll start with San Diego. In

0:08:20.960 --> 0:08:24.560
<v Speaker 1>San Diego or Antonio Gates, one of the best players

0:08:24.560 --> 0:08:27.720
<v Speaker 1>in the history of that franchise, has been suspended four

0:08:27.760 --> 0:08:32.679
<v Speaker 1>games for violating the league's policy on performance enhancing substances.

0:08:33.200 --> 0:08:35.960
<v Speaker 1>Uh Gates, Well, doesn't look like Gates is gonna appeal this.

0:08:36.120 --> 0:08:38.839
<v Speaker 1>He He said that uh he had been taking some

0:08:38.880 --> 0:08:42.680
<v Speaker 1>supplements and quote holistic medicines in an effort to recover

0:08:42.720 --> 0:08:46.000
<v Speaker 1>from this past season. A trigger depositive test which triggers

0:08:46.000 --> 0:08:49.120
<v Speaker 1>a four game band without pay. It keeps keeps them

0:08:49.120 --> 0:08:51.640
<v Speaker 1>out of games against the Lions, Bengals, Vikings and Browns,

0:08:52.440 --> 0:08:56.439
<v Speaker 1>and um Antonio Gates accepted it. The responsibilities that I

0:08:56.520 --> 0:08:59.000
<v Speaker 1>am under. I understand that I am responsible for what

0:08:59.120 --> 0:09:01.920
<v Speaker 1>is in my body, and I always believed that ignorance

0:09:01.960 --> 0:09:04.200
<v Speaker 1>is no excuse when it comes to these issues. I

0:09:04.240 --> 0:09:08.600
<v Speaker 1>take full responsibility for my actions. Uh, Mark will start

0:09:08.600 --> 0:09:11.520
<v Speaker 1>with you your thoughts. Well, last year, we around this

0:09:11.600 --> 0:09:14.560
<v Speaker 1>time tried to paint the narrative that Ladarius Green was

0:09:14.800 --> 0:09:19.080
<v Speaker 1>a superstar in the making, and we were incorrect on

0:09:19.160 --> 0:09:21.400
<v Speaker 1>many levels. And he's gonna have to step up and

0:09:21.440 --> 0:09:23.240
<v Speaker 1>play the first four games. I mean tight ends a

0:09:23.280 --> 0:09:26.200
<v Speaker 1>big part of that offense. And you know, Philip Rivers

0:09:26.240 --> 0:09:29.640
<v Speaker 1>and Gates have been in lockstep for ages. So this

0:09:29.720 --> 0:09:33.200
<v Speaker 1>is a loss for their offense. I think absolutely it's

0:09:33.200 --> 0:09:35.400
<v Speaker 1>a loss. But I think that Ladarius Green could start

0:09:35.400 --> 0:09:37.120
<v Speaker 1>for half the teams in the NFL. He's one of

0:09:37.120 --> 0:09:39.320
<v Speaker 1>the fastest tight ends in the league, which is why

0:09:39.320 --> 0:09:41.880
<v Speaker 1>he was on our making the Leap series. And I

0:09:41.920 --> 0:09:43.800
<v Speaker 1>think they'll miss Gates in the red zone. He uses

0:09:43.840 --> 0:09:46.160
<v Speaker 1>his body as well as any tight end outside of Gronk,

0:09:46.200 --> 0:09:50.040
<v Speaker 1>I guess, or Jimmy Graham. But um, but Darius Green will.

0:09:50.240 --> 0:09:52.040
<v Speaker 1>I think the Charger's offense will be fine with him,

0:09:52.040 --> 0:09:54.640
<v Speaker 1>and there gives him time to know what's gonna happen

0:09:54.679 --> 0:09:56.920
<v Speaker 1>to We had Green as are making the leap guy

0:09:57.000 --> 0:10:00.400
<v Speaker 1>last year. It didn't check out, but he definitely has

0:10:00.520 --> 0:10:02.880
<v Speaker 1>the skills to do it, you know. Yeah, it only

0:10:02.920 --> 0:10:04.920
<v Speaker 1>didn't check out because he didn't get enough playing time.

0:10:05.559 --> 0:10:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Antonio Gates was the fantasy community had written him off,

0:10:09.240 --> 0:10:11.280
<v Speaker 1>but he was obviously still a good player. That's why

0:10:11.440 --> 0:10:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Green didn't play as much. Your So, uh, this is

0:10:16.200 --> 0:10:17.520
<v Speaker 1>what I think of when I hear this, And I

0:10:17.559 --> 0:10:21.000
<v Speaker 1>don't want to necessarily attach this thought to Antonio Gates,

0:10:21.000 --> 0:10:23.720
<v Speaker 1>but I think of when players are aging at the

0:10:23.840 --> 0:10:26.920
<v Speaker 1>end of their career. I might be more likely, and

0:10:26.960 --> 0:10:29.920
<v Speaker 1>again I don't know anything about this current situation. I

0:10:30.000 --> 0:10:32.040
<v Speaker 1>might be more likely to think that maybe something was

0:10:32.080 --> 0:10:34.200
<v Speaker 1>done on purpose because you get to a certain point

0:10:34.240 --> 0:10:37.120
<v Speaker 1>in your career and you if you are coming off

0:10:37.160 --> 0:10:41.000
<v Speaker 1>an injury or something, it's harder to recover, and it

0:10:41.080 --> 0:10:44.720
<v Speaker 1>becomes a choice sometimes of I can take something that

0:10:44.760 --> 0:10:47.720
<v Speaker 1>I know is illegal that's going to actually fix my

0:10:47.760 --> 0:10:50.120
<v Speaker 1>injury and allow me to recover, and then I'm going

0:10:50.160 --> 0:10:52.560
<v Speaker 1>to continue to play for a couple more years or

0:10:52.760 --> 0:10:55.000
<v Speaker 1>not take that and not be able to play for

0:10:55.080 --> 0:10:57.080
<v Speaker 1>a couple more years and collect that paycheck. And if

0:10:57.120 --> 0:11:01.400
<v Speaker 1>I get caught, I could be suspended. But do I

0:11:01.480 --> 0:11:04.679
<v Speaker 1>care versus not getting a paycheck and not playing at all?

0:11:04.840 --> 0:11:07.559
<v Speaker 1>And I I want And I'm not saying that that's

0:11:07.600 --> 0:11:09.400
<v Speaker 1>the case here, but I always wonder that kind of

0:11:09.400 --> 0:11:11.680
<v Speaker 1>when players get up there towards the end of their

0:11:11.720 --> 0:11:15.400
<v Speaker 1>career and just turned thirty five, and it's it's telling

0:11:15.440 --> 0:11:18.360
<v Speaker 1>to me that and again speaks to the beating these

0:11:18.360 --> 0:11:21.920
<v Speaker 1>guys takes during the course of a season, that he

0:11:21.960 --> 0:11:24.600
<v Speaker 1>felt he needed to take these things to recover from

0:11:24.640 --> 0:11:26.720
<v Speaker 1>the season, even though he had a period of months

0:11:27.000 --> 0:11:28.559
<v Speaker 1>for his body to get right. So it tells you

0:11:28.760 --> 0:11:30.640
<v Speaker 1>that he needed to take p d s because again

0:11:30.679 --> 0:11:32.520
<v Speaker 1>he has said in his statement that he didn't take

0:11:32.559 --> 0:11:35.320
<v Speaker 1>anything knowingly, but he did admit to taking some sort

0:11:35.320 --> 0:11:37.520
<v Speaker 1>of supplement or something like that that he didn't know

0:11:37.559 --> 0:11:40.840
<v Speaker 1>it was illegal to recover, so he's taking something. Lindsay,

0:11:40.840 --> 0:11:43.200
<v Speaker 1>a quick rundown of the holistic medicines you are taking

0:11:43.280 --> 0:11:45.680
<v Speaker 1>right now? You could share this with us, Go ahead.

0:11:47.320 --> 0:11:49.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know what fits into that category. I

0:11:49.280 --> 0:11:52.200
<v Speaker 1>don't even take vitamins, so you don't neither, do I know?

0:11:52.280 --> 0:11:55.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm very unhealthy. Hard to categorize what's going into her

0:11:55.400 --> 0:11:59.400
<v Speaker 1>body and yours and mine? And well, why do we

0:11:59.400 --> 0:12:01.040
<v Speaker 1>want to go down that road that I don't full?

0:12:01.080 --> 0:12:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Different type of podcast it is. That's our health Watch podcast,

0:12:05.320 --> 0:12:08.120
<v Speaker 1>which will air after our Theology podcast. We got a

0:12:08.200 --> 0:12:10.000
<v Speaker 1>nice like we could we should have like a serious

0:12:10.080 --> 0:12:12.680
<v Speaker 1>XM channel. At this point, who is less qualified to

0:12:12.679 --> 0:12:15.200
<v Speaker 1>talk about health Watch than three of us? Well, that's fair,

0:12:16.320 --> 0:12:18.400
<v Speaker 1>three of us. The three of us, man, I'm sure

0:12:18.400 --> 0:12:20.160
<v Speaker 1>you're much healthier than the three of us. Oh no,

0:12:20.200 --> 0:12:22.720
<v Speaker 1>I just told you I'm very unhealthy. Well, well, Lindsay

0:12:22.760 --> 0:12:25.720
<v Speaker 1>sometimes walks by while we're eating lunch and she gets angry.

0:12:25.800 --> 0:12:29.600
<v Speaker 1>That maybe not angry, but she's she gets jealous that

0:12:29.679 --> 0:12:32.800
<v Speaker 1>we're eating like nice lunches, and you feel that maybe

0:12:32.840 --> 0:12:35.240
<v Speaker 1>you can't do that. You have like fried chicken and

0:12:35.320 --> 0:12:38.160
<v Speaker 1>fries or something like that, and it like smells and

0:12:38.200 --> 0:12:40.760
<v Speaker 1>it smells delicious, but it's not something that I should

0:12:40.760 --> 0:12:45.040
<v Speaker 1>go purchase from our huddle cafeteria that's typically on West

0:12:45.120 --> 0:12:50.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't you know, I often thinks, get well, it's

0:12:50.640 --> 0:12:53.280
<v Speaker 1>always some like gigantic pasta thing wrapped inside like a

0:12:53.320 --> 0:12:57.080
<v Speaker 1>bread roll. Mark doesn't like food. Moving on the next

0:12:57.120 --> 0:13:00.959
<v Speaker 1>suspension UH the New York Jets. My Jets man Sheldon

0:13:01.080 --> 0:13:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Richardson has been one of their best players for the

0:13:02.960 --> 0:13:06.480
<v Speaker 1>last couple of years, two thousand thirteen defensive Rookie of

0:13:06.480 --> 0:13:09.160
<v Speaker 1>the Year. He will miss the first four games of

0:13:09.160 --> 0:13:12.160
<v Speaker 1>the year for violating the NFL Policy and Program for

0:13:12.240 --> 0:13:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Substances of Abuse UH. Richardson will miss UH four games

0:13:17.360 --> 0:13:21.280
<v Speaker 1>come back after the team's Week four matchup against the Dolphins.

0:13:22.000 --> 0:13:24.360
<v Speaker 1>Richardson also this is not going to be an appeal situation.

0:13:24.360 --> 0:13:27.600
<v Speaker 1>He apologized to for letting everyone down and all that.

0:13:27.720 --> 0:13:31.439
<v Speaker 1>Todd Bowles, Jets coach, called the band disappointing for Sheldon

0:13:31.559 --> 0:13:35.120
<v Speaker 1>and the team. So we don't know exactly what. There's

0:13:35.120 --> 0:13:37.040
<v Speaker 1>some reports out there that what it might be, but

0:13:37.120 --> 0:13:39.320
<v Speaker 1>we don't know what the what the substance of abuse

0:13:39.440 --> 0:13:41.800
<v Speaker 1>is but this is different than Gates who was a

0:13:41.840 --> 0:13:47.200
<v Speaker 1>p D and this is uh something else, lindsay your thoughts, well,

0:13:47.240 --> 0:13:50.800
<v Speaker 1>thank goodness they drafted Leonard. Yes, that's my initial thought.

0:13:51.000 --> 0:13:53.640
<v Speaker 1>And my second thought is when did they know that

0:13:53.720 --> 0:13:57.440
<v Speaker 1>this happened? It is weird to find out the team's

0:13:58.600 --> 0:14:00.520
<v Speaker 1>obviously learn at a different time, and then we do

0:14:00.600 --> 0:14:03.040
<v Speaker 1>often about about how they things fall. But I can't

0:14:03.080 --> 0:14:05.360
<v Speaker 1>imagine it's been that long. Well, even if it was,

0:14:05.880 --> 0:14:08.320
<v Speaker 1>would you know? Not that not that you don't draft

0:14:08.400 --> 0:14:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Leonard Williams just four games? Yeah, I guess, or unless

0:14:13.400 --> 0:14:17.040
<v Speaker 1>it is valuable, right, and unless it's something we don't

0:14:17.080 --> 0:14:19.920
<v Speaker 1>know behind the scenes. Maybe Sheldon Richardson is someone they're

0:14:19.920 --> 0:14:22.560
<v Speaker 1>concerned about. Again we don't know. But then you also

0:14:22.640 --> 0:14:25.360
<v Speaker 1>got the Moe Wilkerson contract situation, so maybe we see

0:14:25.360 --> 0:14:27.840
<v Speaker 1>the Jets of having this embarrassment of riches and the

0:14:27.920 --> 0:14:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Jets are you know, think thinking two steps ahead? Uh

0:14:31.360 --> 0:14:34.080
<v Speaker 1>in this case. But I guess the silver lining, Uh,

0:14:34.120 --> 0:14:36.400
<v Speaker 1>if you're a Jets fan like myself, or even if

0:14:36.440 --> 0:14:39.240
<v Speaker 1>you're in that building, is that you have this great

0:14:39.280 --> 0:14:42.040
<v Speaker 1>new piece and Leonard Williams now instead of like having

0:14:42.040 --> 0:14:43.760
<v Speaker 1>a scheme up away to get him on the field.

0:14:43.920 --> 0:14:45.720
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna plug him right in. You're gonna give him

0:14:45.720 --> 0:14:48.320
<v Speaker 1>a full training camp in four preseason games, and then

0:14:48.360 --> 0:14:51.280
<v Speaker 1>you're probably gonna give him four starts. Uh So it

0:14:51.360 --> 0:14:53.400
<v Speaker 1>looks like the Jets are gonna get a good look

0:14:53.400 --> 0:14:57.400
<v Speaker 1>at what they drafted. Yeah, I think it's with with

0:14:57.520 --> 0:15:00.640
<v Speaker 1>these suspensions. The report was marijuana, let's just throw that

0:15:00.680 --> 0:15:03.680
<v Speaker 1>out there. And the cb A was signed in two

0:15:03.720 --> 0:15:06.080
<v Speaker 1>thousand eleven. The mood of the country has shifted since then,

0:15:06.160 --> 0:15:09.160
<v Speaker 1>and I think people are gonna start the question why

0:15:09.200 --> 0:15:13.280
<v Speaker 1>are these players getting suspended when the last three presidents

0:15:13.280 --> 0:15:15.800
<v Speaker 1>we've had, as Rhoda World's Pat Darty pointed out today,

0:15:15.920 --> 0:15:19.400
<v Speaker 1>have admitted to drug use in marijuana. The country doesn't

0:15:19.400 --> 0:15:21.520
<v Speaker 1>feel the same way about this as it did four

0:15:21.600 --> 0:15:23.800
<v Speaker 1>years ago when the cb A was signed. I think

0:15:23.880 --> 0:15:26.280
<v Speaker 1>we have to start asking why are they getting suspended

0:15:26.280 --> 0:15:28.120
<v Speaker 1>four games for this kind of when you already here

0:15:28.240 --> 0:15:31.720
<v Speaker 1>that tested or not tested. Huge chunks of the current

0:15:31.840 --> 0:15:36.040
<v Speaker 1>NFL rosters are filled with players that are using medicinal

0:15:36.080 --> 0:15:38.480
<v Speaker 1>marijuan on some level, and it's I think you're exactly

0:15:38.560 --> 0:15:41.080
<v Speaker 1>right that they're gonna have to confront this as for

0:15:41.240 --> 0:15:43.160
<v Speaker 1>where what it means for the Jets real quick. I mean,

0:15:43.200 --> 0:15:44.920
<v Speaker 1>I think it's funny that in April were like, oh,

0:15:44.960 --> 0:15:48.000
<v Speaker 1>why would you draft this kind of defensive player? You

0:15:48.040 --> 0:15:50.640
<v Speaker 1>already have three or four these guys. Every NFL season

0:15:50.760 --> 0:15:55.320
<v Speaker 1>rips players off rosters, injuries, suspensions, you need, you just

0:15:55.360 --> 0:15:58.160
<v Speaker 1>go after the best player you can. And from another angle,

0:15:58.280 --> 0:16:01.080
<v Speaker 1>we freak out about anything that's four games long. Going

0:16:01.160 --> 0:16:03.840
<v Speaker 1>into the season, the first month feels so big, but

0:16:03.960 --> 0:16:07.280
<v Speaker 1>this season is so long that four games is absolutely

0:16:07.320 --> 0:16:09.360
<v Speaker 1>by the time you get to week thirteen, fourteen, that

0:16:09.480 --> 0:16:11.720
<v Speaker 1>is a million years ago. They're gonna have all these

0:16:11.720 --> 0:16:17.160
<v Speaker 1>guys alright. Moving on suspension number three, the Dallas Cowboys

0:16:17.160 --> 0:16:21.200
<v Speaker 1>have lost Orlando McClain uh for four games, also a

0:16:21.280 --> 0:16:25.880
<v Speaker 1>violation on the Policy against Substance of Abuse. McClain also

0:16:26.520 --> 0:16:29.920
<v Speaker 1>uh is not taking the appeal road. He apologized, Uh,

0:16:29.960 --> 0:16:32.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, I would not break the rules of the

0:16:32.520 --> 0:16:35.280
<v Speaker 1>profession in the future. I regret my er blah blah

0:16:35.320 --> 0:16:38.760
<v Speaker 1>blah blah blah. This is the same Rolando McClain who uh,

0:16:38.800 --> 0:16:41.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, put his career back on the right track

0:16:41.280 --> 0:16:44.280
<v Speaker 1>after two separate retirements. He ended up having a breakout

0:16:44.400 --> 0:16:49.480
<v Speaker 1>year last season. Uh, after the Cowboys lost Shawn Lee,

0:16:49.560 --> 0:16:51.560
<v Speaker 1>they resigned him to a one year deal and he

0:16:51.640 --> 0:16:55.760
<v Speaker 1>was facing a four game Uh fine already, and now

0:16:55.800 --> 0:17:00.040
<v Speaker 1>he has for a prior a prior issue with a

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:03.200
<v Speaker 1>substance of abuse and now a four game suspension. So

0:17:04.000 --> 0:17:06.200
<v Speaker 1>to me, a huge red flag that McLean is back

0:17:06.200 --> 0:17:08.280
<v Speaker 1>in trouble and a good reason why he got a

0:17:08.320 --> 0:17:11.159
<v Speaker 1>one year deal even off a great season. He was

0:17:11.200 --> 0:17:14.399
<v Speaker 1>retired twice by the age. I mean, this is nothing

0:17:14.440 --> 0:17:18.840
<v Speaker 1>for him. That's just like a nap. Maybe he thought, wait,

0:17:18.880 --> 0:17:21.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm not getting paid for the first four games. I

0:17:21.480 --> 0:17:24.600
<v Speaker 1>ain't gonna go to work either. You think you're a

0:17:24.680 --> 0:17:27.560
<v Speaker 1>man of that little integrity you believe Lana mcclaimed to be.

0:17:27.800 --> 0:17:30.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying that it's one of the many theories

0:17:30.280 --> 0:17:35.760
<v Speaker 1>that are possible. It's a big day of theories. Lindsay

0:17:35.880 --> 0:17:39.159
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts. I mean, it's hard to be totally surprised

0:17:39.200 --> 0:17:42.520
<v Speaker 1>because of his history, and you have to figure that

0:17:43.080 --> 0:17:47.440
<v Speaker 1>that Dallas is prepared for something like this in this

0:17:47.600 --> 0:17:51.240
<v Speaker 1>case because because of the lack of reliability. I suppose

0:17:51.280 --> 0:17:53.800
<v Speaker 1>in the past he's such a good player. But you've

0:17:53.920 --> 0:17:56.280
<v Speaker 1>got to be able to back him up. He missed

0:17:56.320 --> 0:17:58.399
<v Speaker 1>a few games last year, and Anthony Hitchins, who was

0:17:58.440 --> 0:18:01.000
<v Speaker 1>a rookie at the time, played pretty well, especially in

0:18:01.080 --> 0:18:04.240
<v Speaker 1>run defense. They picked up Jasper Brinkley, who's a similar

0:18:04.280 --> 0:18:06.240
<v Speaker 1>type of guy who does well and run defense. The

0:18:06.359 --> 0:18:09.120
<v Speaker 1>question is how will they play on passing down Shawn

0:18:09.200 --> 0:18:10.879
<v Speaker 1>Lee is really good on passing downs. They might have

0:18:10.880 --> 0:18:13.200
<v Speaker 1>to play more safeties. And let me just again point

0:18:13.200 --> 0:18:15.560
<v Speaker 1>out because and I took a lot of heat because

0:18:15.600 --> 0:18:17.320
<v Speaker 1>I wrote about how I thought the Cowboys could come

0:18:17.320 --> 0:18:20.439
<v Speaker 1>back to Earth this season. Um, and you know not

0:18:20.560 --> 0:18:22.159
<v Speaker 1>that this is gonna be the reason they might not.

0:18:22.240 --> 0:18:25.600
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time, it's like everything worked right

0:18:25.680 --> 0:18:28.159
<v Speaker 1>for Dallas last year, right down to Rolando McLean is

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:30.600
<v Speaker 1>showing up out of nowhere and being a main cog

0:18:30.640 --> 0:18:33.080
<v Speaker 1>in their defense. So all of a sudden, he's gone

0:18:33.080 --> 0:18:34.560
<v Speaker 1>four games. You don't know what kind of guy's gonna

0:18:34.600 --> 0:18:36.960
<v Speaker 1>come back. Is he gonna was he one hit wonder

0:18:37.560 --> 0:18:41.919
<v Speaker 1>callback last podcast professional? Or is he gonna be you know?

0:18:42.040 --> 0:18:44.000
<v Speaker 1>You know what I mean. It's like the Cowboys, you

0:18:44.040 --> 0:18:46.520
<v Speaker 1>cannot assume they're gonna replicate what they did, Like just

0:18:46.600 --> 0:18:49.520
<v Speaker 1>block all of those Cowboys fans who complained it's June

0:18:49.560 --> 0:18:52.240
<v Speaker 1>or early July. Who cares what your analysis is? ESPNS.

0:18:52.280 --> 0:18:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Tim McMahon tweeted also uh McClean. Of McClean, he said, Uh,

0:18:57.240 --> 0:18:59.760
<v Speaker 1>good thing he rehab back home in Alabama. Huh. I

0:18:59.760 --> 0:19:01.760
<v Speaker 1>guess he made the choice to stay home and get

0:19:01.880 --> 0:19:05.160
<v Speaker 1>right rather than work with the team. One of those

0:19:05.160 --> 0:19:08.320
<v Speaker 1>guys do not in Alabama? Yeah, don't do it. Finally,

0:19:09.040 --> 0:19:11.359
<v Speaker 1>this is number four on my suspension list, Lindsay. And

0:19:11.400 --> 0:19:13.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't know if that is disrespectful to

0:19:14.040 --> 0:19:17.560
<v Speaker 1>a former making the leap candidate around the NFL. Uh.

0:19:17.640 --> 0:19:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Dayton Jones of the Packers. Uh is suspended without pay

0:19:22.240 --> 0:19:25.719
<v Speaker 1>for one game for violating the league's policy against Substances

0:19:25.720 --> 0:19:29.040
<v Speaker 1>of abuse. Uh. This is the same Jones who battled

0:19:29.040 --> 0:19:31.080
<v Speaker 1>an ankle injury last season had just one and a

0:19:31.080 --> 0:19:34.159
<v Speaker 1>half sacks. Uh. This is entering his third year and

0:19:34.160 --> 0:19:36.840
<v Speaker 1>he thought maybe as a first round pick, this would

0:19:36.840 --> 0:19:38.800
<v Speaker 1>be the year he gets going. And be sure, sure

0:19:38.840 --> 0:19:40.919
<v Speaker 1>you could. Still it's only one game, but not a

0:19:40.920 --> 0:19:44.879
<v Speaker 1>great start. Well it. First of all, in your defense,

0:19:44.880 --> 0:19:46.440
<v Speaker 1>it makes sense that he would be last because he's

0:19:46.440 --> 0:19:49.960
<v Speaker 1>only one game. Okay, cool, there you go. So uh.

0:19:50.040 --> 0:19:53.119
<v Speaker 1>And as far as how it impacts the team, obviously,

0:19:53.200 --> 0:19:55.879
<v Speaker 1>this is just one game and you figure they have

0:19:55.960 --> 0:19:59.080
<v Speaker 1>the depth to handle this. So probably not topic of

0:19:59.080 --> 0:20:01.760
<v Speaker 1>a deal for the Packer. Certainly not a good start

0:20:01.800 --> 0:20:04.920
<v Speaker 1>for Dayton Jones in a big kind of not make

0:20:04.960 --> 0:20:07.000
<v Speaker 1>it or break it, but in a show me what

0:20:07.040 --> 0:20:08.720
<v Speaker 1>you got kind of season for him. I mean it

0:20:08.840 --> 0:20:11.479
<v Speaker 1>is because they're gonna have to decide whether they want

0:20:11.520 --> 0:20:13.760
<v Speaker 1>to pick up his fifth year option after this season,

0:20:13.840 --> 0:20:16.080
<v Speaker 1>and I think he's got all the talent in the world.

0:20:16.119 --> 0:20:18.760
<v Speaker 1>That's not unlike some of the other guys that we

0:20:18.880 --> 0:20:21.119
<v Speaker 1>feel like maybe we picked a little early for making

0:20:21.119 --> 0:20:23.359
<v Speaker 1>the lead. He hasn't become the guy that we thought

0:20:23.359 --> 0:20:25.440
<v Speaker 1>he would last summer. But it's not for lack of

0:20:25.520 --> 0:20:27.320
<v Speaker 1>you know this, He was trying this soft season. He

0:20:27.400 --> 0:20:29.280
<v Speaker 1>was doing yoga and all this other stuff, trying to

0:20:29.320 --> 0:20:32.440
<v Speaker 1>get his body more flexible. Packers said that defensive line

0:20:32.480 --> 0:20:34.320
<v Speaker 1>is as deep as it's been in a long time.

0:20:34.800 --> 0:20:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Against the Bears Week one, not an issue. He'll be back.

0:20:38.000 --> 0:20:40.040
<v Speaker 1>B J. Rodger's healthy this year. They didn't have him

0:20:40.119 --> 0:20:41.840
<v Speaker 1>last year, so that I mean, he might be even

0:20:41.920 --> 0:20:44.760
<v Speaker 1>better than Dayton Jones, who cares what does healthy mean

0:20:44.840 --> 0:20:46.960
<v Speaker 1>four hundred and twelve pounds? What is where does he

0:20:47.000 --> 0:20:51.919
<v Speaker 1>weigh in? This is another shot against food work. No,

0:20:52.000 --> 0:20:57.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm asking a question. I thought that was a gigant Um.

0:20:57.600 --> 0:21:01.080
<v Speaker 1>That's what's happening in the news, and uh, hopefully there's

0:21:01.119 --> 0:21:03.880
<v Speaker 1>nothing else happens today. Nobody else gets suspended. I'm trying

0:21:03.920 --> 0:21:10.040
<v Speaker 1>to do a podcast here, dad, Um, all right, let's

0:21:10.040 --> 0:21:12.800
<v Speaker 1>move on. I have that go Oh let's thinking, lindsay, Um,

0:21:12.880 --> 0:21:14.479
<v Speaker 1>we're about to talk about the Top one hundred. You've

0:21:14.520 --> 0:21:17.600
<v Speaker 1>been on our podcast a few times now, how about

0:21:17.840 --> 0:21:20.680
<v Speaker 1>with the finale of Top one coming up, you give

0:21:20.800 --> 0:21:24.120
<v Speaker 1>us a prominent on camera roll over an old studio

0:21:24.200 --> 0:21:29.800
<v Speaker 1>one thoughts. I'm you're gonna have to repeat yourself. Okay, okay,

0:21:29.920 --> 0:21:32.639
<v Speaker 1>it makes that little sense. I think you've been on

0:21:32.640 --> 0:21:36.320
<v Speaker 1>our podcast several times. Oh well, now it's time to

0:21:36.400 --> 0:21:39.639
<v Speaker 1>reciprocate the finale show. A lot of eyeball is going

0:21:39.680 --> 0:21:42.360
<v Speaker 1>to be on it. Maybe it's time we're on stage two.

0:21:42.400 --> 0:21:45.120
<v Speaker 1>That's what threw me off. So I was like, what

0:21:45.119 --> 0:21:46.480
<v Speaker 1>what do you want to be on Total Acts? I

0:21:46.480 --> 0:21:47.879
<v Speaker 1>thought it was because you were looking at your phone,

0:21:47.920 --> 0:21:52.879
<v Speaker 1>but you're saying, okay, both. But okay, it's time to

0:21:52.920 --> 0:21:55.560
<v Speaker 1>have the old zeuser on TV. Wait no, I said

0:21:55.560 --> 0:21:58.520
<v Speaker 1>the whole group, even TV put him in the background.

0:21:58.560 --> 0:22:02.520
<v Speaker 1>I haven't sweeping up sweeping. How did you get to

0:22:02.560 --> 0:22:05.440
<v Speaker 1>be the sweeper? I have? You know on the Emmy

0:22:05.480 --> 0:22:10.199
<v Speaker 1>winners are allowed on TV. Oh wow, I've seen some

0:22:10.240 --> 0:22:11.840
<v Speaker 1>of the other people on TV gonna have a live

0:22:11.880 --> 0:22:14.439
<v Speaker 1>studio audience. We could play. We could sit there. That

0:22:14.440 --> 0:22:18.560
<v Speaker 1>would work. That's all we need for you. We will

0:22:18.600 --> 0:22:22.679
<v Speaker 1>sit there. And how about this, we sit there. But

0:22:22.720 --> 0:22:24.639
<v Speaker 1>if if there isn't a way to work us into it,

0:22:25.000 --> 0:22:29.119
<v Speaker 1>we will boo lustily throughout the throughout the show. However

0:22:29.200 --> 0:22:33.880
<v Speaker 1>long it is. How long is an hour? Two hours? However,

0:22:33.920 --> 0:22:35.520
<v Speaker 1>it's afraid you guys are gonna milk it. It's a

0:22:35.560 --> 0:22:38.320
<v Speaker 1>two hour finale and then an hour long reaction show.

0:22:38.359 --> 0:22:40.680
<v Speaker 1>So the studio audience is actually sitting there for three hours.

0:22:40.720 --> 0:22:43.320
<v Speaker 1>That's a bit of a milk, I gotta say. But

0:22:43.400 --> 0:22:46.600
<v Speaker 1>it's so worth it, though, isn't it absolutely three hours?

0:22:46.720 --> 0:22:51.919
<v Speaker 1>In fact? Wednesday, next Wednesday, at what time, lindsay, eight eastern,

0:22:52.000 --> 0:22:54.880
<v Speaker 1>eight pm Eastern, that's when you could see that finale

0:22:55.440 --> 0:22:59.240
<v Speaker 1>the top one ten to one the big reveal who

0:22:59.280 --> 0:23:01.600
<v Speaker 1>is the greatest player in the NFL. Now that leads

0:23:01.680 --> 0:23:04.800
<v Speaker 1>us to our next topic. Um and uh again, I

0:23:04.880 --> 0:23:08.639
<v Speaker 1>don't want to, you know, make things weird because Lindsay

0:23:08.840 --> 0:23:12.640
<v Speaker 1>is the face of the Top one hundred countdown. Uh

0:23:12.720 --> 0:23:16.840
<v Speaker 1>and you know, just saying you're making it weird, So

0:23:17.440 --> 0:23:20.520
<v Speaker 1>don't want to make it weird. There might some criticism

0:23:20.640 --> 0:23:24.080
<v Speaker 1>might be coming down the pike. That's all I should

0:23:24.080 --> 0:23:28.160
<v Speaker 1>get personal. So this is a segment I like to call, oh,

0:23:28.480 --> 0:23:31.000
<v Speaker 1>what's wrong with the Top one hundred? Lindsay Rhodes is

0:23:31.040 --> 0:23:32.560
<v Speaker 1>the host of the Top one hundred Players of two

0:23:32.560 --> 0:23:34.439
<v Speaker 1>thousand fifteen, but it is in no way affiliated but

0:23:34.480 --> 0:23:40.240
<v Speaker 1>the voting process of the program. So I think, now

0:23:40.280 --> 0:23:42.560
<v Speaker 1>that everything's out there and there's an official disclaimer, now

0:23:42.600 --> 0:23:46.439
<v Speaker 1>we're safe, will not be hurt. Let me start right,

0:23:46.440 --> 0:23:49.960
<v Speaker 1>and let me start by just unveiling twenty through eleven,

0:23:49.960 --> 0:23:54.040
<v Speaker 1>which aired yesterday. Great content by Lindsay. I thought, yeah,

0:23:55.040 --> 0:23:58.240
<v Speaker 1>it's twenty da Marius Thomas of the Broncos nineteen, Patrick

0:23:58.280 --> 0:24:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Peterson eighteen, Jordy Nelson seventeen, Rivas Island Love It sixteen,

0:24:02.880 --> 0:24:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Levy on Bell fifteen, Dez Bryant, we got the big

0:24:05.720 --> 0:24:09.720
<v Speaker 1>boys now on this list? Uh fourteen, Luke Keikley, thirteen,

0:24:09.880 --> 0:24:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Julio Jones, twelve, Jamal Charles and eleven. Oh outside the

0:24:13.560 --> 0:24:17.840
<v Speaker 1>top ten Richard Sherman, which I'm sure did he tweet

0:24:17.840 --> 0:24:21.520
<v Speaker 1>about it? Probably in his mind, if not a tweet

0:24:21.560 --> 0:24:24.720
<v Speaker 1>does Bryant tweeted? I saw that he l O L

0:24:24.840 --> 0:24:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Y at NFL network. Right, yeah, this all seems eminently reasonable.

0:24:28.280 --> 0:24:31.800
<v Speaker 1>There's nothing offensive here at all. Why did you made

0:24:31.840 --> 0:24:35.040
<v Speaker 1>a comment when you read Darrell Rivas? I was happy. No,

0:24:35.160 --> 0:24:36.720
<v Speaker 1>I was okay with it. He's in the top twenty.

0:24:36.760 --> 0:24:38.119
<v Speaker 1>If he would have been outside the top twenty, I

0:24:38.160 --> 0:24:40.600
<v Speaker 1>would have been upset. Because Eric Davis was very upset

0:24:40.600 --> 0:24:42.440
<v Speaker 1>that he was seventeen. He thought he should be higher.

0:24:42.600 --> 0:24:45.720
<v Speaker 1>He said that he could make an argument for Darrell

0:24:45.760 --> 0:24:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Reevius why he should be number one. Overall. Let's let's

0:24:48.560 --> 0:24:51.440
<v Speaker 1>hear it. Bring him in, d we old man, he's

0:24:51.600 --> 0:24:53.560
<v Speaker 1>we have him in handcuffs. I don't know why he

0:24:53.560 --> 0:24:55.600
<v Speaker 1>would be in handcuffs. It's weird. Elexie would have to

0:24:55.640 --> 0:24:58.399
<v Speaker 1>forcibly be on our show. Makes sense, all right. I

0:24:58.520 --> 0:25:01.080
<v Speaker 1>like how you worked that out. I out of itself.

0:25:01.480 --> 0:25:05.680
<v Speaker 1>I got in and got bes and I just standing back, Uh, yeah,

0:25:05.720 --> 0:25:07.760
<v Speaker 1>I have no problem with this. The ten, of course

0:25:08.600 --> 0:25:10.480
<v Speaker 1>does Brian at fifteen doesn't bother you. The fact that

0:25:11.359 --> 0:25:13.600
<v Speaker 1>the only thing that surprised me last night, and I

0:25:13.640 --> 0:25:15.959
<v Speaker 1>was maybe a little bit surprised that Darrell Reavis was

0:25:16.240 --> 0:25:19.159
<v Speaker 1>not in the top ten, but not very and the

0:25:19.200 --> 0:25:23.560
<v Speaker 1>fact that des Bryant ranked below Julio Jones surprised. I'm

0:25:23.560 --> 0:25:26.719
<v Speaker 1>not saying I didn't. I didn't see that coming at all,

0:25:26.760 --> 0:25:29.000
<v Speaker 1>because I think when you have conversations with people about

0:25:29.240 --> 0:25:32.440
<v Speaker 1>who's the top receiver in the league for the last

0:25:32.480 --> 0:25:35.080
<v Speaker 1>few years, it's spent obviously that's Calvin. This is the

0:25:35.119 --> 0:25:37.040
<v Speaker 1>first year in a couple of years where you kind

0:25:37.040 --> 0:25:39.280
<v Speaker 1>of have more of a conversation and the names that

0:25:39.359 --> 0:25:43.600
<v Speaker 1>get thrown out there in that conversation are Calvin Antonio

0:25:44.320 --> 0:25:49.480
<v Speaker 1>and plays for the Cowboys. I mean he really though, yeah, really,

0:25:50.320 --> 0:25:54.800
<v Speaker 1>look at what sixteen touchdowns last year for? Does everyone

0:25:54.840 --> 0:25:56.679
<v Speaker 1>knows that you're the guy getting the ball? Look at

0:25:56.720 --> 0:25:59.159
<v Speaker 1>Julio Jones yards that everybody knows he's getting the ball? Well,

0:25:59.160 --> 0:26:04.040
<v Speaker 1>and it's there. They're separated by two sobs. Not good anymore?

0:26:04.480 --> 0:26:06.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't think um. I don't think des is reached

0:26:06.920 --> 0:26:10.720
<v Speaker 1>the ceiling yet either. He fades from their game plan occasionally,

0:26:10.760 --> 0:26:12.400
<v Speaker 1>which is very strange, and you don't see that from

0:26:12.400 --> 0:26:15.320
<v Speaker 1>the only run like six or seven routes. If you

0:26:15.520 --> 0:26:18.160
<v Speaker 1>if you are starting a team from scratch for next year,

0:26:18.240 --> 0:26:20.639
<v Speaker 1>only which wide receiver do you want to start with?

0:26:21.000 --> 0:26:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Between the two of him, I would go Julio Jones.

0:26:23.760 --> 0:26:25.920
<v Speaker 1>That's why I don't problem with him. About Odell Beckham.

0:26:26.000 --> 0:26:28.320
<v Speaker 1>You would start your team with Julio. Are we talking

0:26:28.359 --> 0:26:30.639
<v Speaker 1>these two? Are we talking to anyone? I would start

0:26:31.240 --> 0:26:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Odell Beckham. I think that's an easy decision. But Odell

0:26:34.960 --> 0:26:37.639
<v Speaker 1>Beckham over just for one year. I'm not saying like

0:26:37.640 --> 0:26:41.240
<v Speaker 1>you're signing him for the life of his for right now,

0:26:41.320 --> 0:26:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Calvin Johnson or O'Dell Beckham one or the other. I'd

0:26:43.480 --> 0:26:46.720
<v Speaker 1>stick with Julio Jones. I'd stick with Dez. But back

0:26:46.760 --> 0:26:48.880
<v Speaker 1>to the question of Julio Dees just one of those

0:26:49.720 --> 0:26:53.720
<v Speaker 1>ju Obviously, if he'd take Julio over anyone better in

0:26:53.720 --> 0:26:55.680
<v Speaker 1>the red zone, Julio is better all over the rest

0:26:55.680 --> 0:26:58.080
<v Speaker 1>of the field. I'll always be nervous about Julio Jones's

0:26:58.119 --> 0:27:02.040
<v Speaker 1>foot too, because you don't know about Dez Bryan backs

0:27:02.080 --> 0:27:06.800
<v Speaker 1>extracurricular activities. Fair all, fair points, and listen, that is

0:27:06.800 --> 0:27:08.919
<v Speaker 1>the type of stuff that the top one hunder brings debate,

0:27:09.200 --> 0:27:12.200
<v Speaker 1>healthy debate. So let's now go Now this is what

0:27:12.320 --> 0:27:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Now we're gonna get to it. Now we're gonna go

0:27:14.359 --> 0:27:17.560
<v Speaker 1>around the Horn twice, which although it is the name

0:27:17.600 --> 0:27:21.800
<v Speaker 1>of an ESPN program, not affiliated and the intellectual property

0:27:21.920 --> 0:27:24.840
<v Speaker 1>is not exclusive, so we can't use in the title.

0:27:25.240 --> 0:27:27.600
<v Speaker 1>So anyone who's ever played Little League baseball through the

0:27:27.600 --> 0:27:31.120
<v Speaker 1>ball around the horn, exactly the old around the horn

0:27:31.200 --> 0:27:34.520
<v Speaker 1>double play five for three. Anyone who ever sailed around

0:27:34.520 --> 0:27:37.639
<v Speaker 1>Africa went around the horn, did that too? An effective

0:27:37.640 --> 0:27:40.320
<v Speaker 1>call back to a dining sport. I was waiting for

0:27:40.359 --> 0:27:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Mark to take an unfair shot. All right, Mark, we'll

0:27:43.119 --> 0:27:47.200
<v Speaker 1>start with you. We're gonna now each of us pick

0:27:47.280 --> 0:27:49.800
<v Speaker 1>two names on the list. Now, lindsay, I'm gonna bring

0:27:49.880 --> 0:27:52.240
<v Speaker 1>up the spreadsheet that has the entire list. So do

0:27:52.280 --> 0:27:57.399
<v Speaker 1>not look. Listen, don't look. We have total access to

0:27:57.480 --> 0:28:00.360
<v Speaker 1>the spreadsheet. You're not giving her the two How much

0:28:00.359 --> 0:28:02.200
<v Speaker 1>wrong with this? By the way, And I'm gonna tell

0:28:02.240 --> 0:28:05.120
<v Speaker 1>on you. I don't say anything alright, now we're gonna

0:28:05.119 --> 0:28:09.480
<v Speaker 1>look only from one to eleven. Okay, and uh we'll

0:28:09.480 --> 0:28:11.639
<v Speaker 1>start with you. Mark, name one of the players that

0:28:11.680 --> 0:28:13.760
<v Speaker 1>have been revealed so far where you looked at He

0:28:13.800 --> 0:28:16.040
<v Speaker 1>said that guy is either way too high, way too low,

0:28:16.280 --> 0:28:18.720
<v Speaker 1>or shouldn't be on the list at all. Well, it's

0:28:18.720 --> 0:28:21.280
<v Speaker 1>easy for me because this is what gets me upset

0:28:21.280 --> 0:28:23.439
<v Speaker 1>about the top one to start with this Where the

0:28:23.480 --> 0:28:27.720
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks place Matt Ryan. It's seventies seven and Mark's not kidding,

0:28:27.720 --> 0:28:32.760
<v Speaker 1>he really does get up. My problem is I just

0:28:33.040 --> 0:28:36.439
<v Speaker 1>view this is valuable player. How much value does he

0:28:36.480 --> 0:28:39.440
<v Speaker 1>bring to his team? Matt Ryan is more valuable, valuable

0:28:39.480 --> 0:28:42.800
<v Speaker 1>than send Derrick Marks. I can't believe he's below Charles

0:28:42.800 --> 0:28:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Woodson and Julius Thomas. You start a team with the

0:28:46.440 --> 0:28:48.120
<v Speaker 1>guy like Matt Ryan, and I think that some of

0:28:48.160 --> 0:28:50.120
<v Speaker 1>the quarterbacks they just had to find a place to

0:28:50.160 --> 0:28:52.760
<v Speaker 1>put them. And there's what kind of season did the

0:28:53.000 --> 0:28:55.760
<v Speaker 1>entire team have last year at quarterback? Takes a hit

0:28:55.840 --> 0:28:58.080
<v Speaker 1>on that big time with wins. And I look at

0:28:58.120 --> 0:28:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Matt Ryan and I say he should be a lot

0:28:59.800 --> 0:29:03.600
<v Speaker 1>hire on this list because of franchise. Quarterback is eminently

0:29:03.720 --> 0:29:08.440
<v Speaker 1>more valuable than some of the shmows that are above them.

0:29:08.560 --> 0:29:11.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what it is kind of a harsh

0:29:11.320 --> 0:29:13.480
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, you just threw Charles Woodson into

0:29:13.560 --> 0:29:16.479
<v Speaker 1>the category of schmow. Well, no, I think that he.

0:29:16.680 --> 0:29:20.280
<v Speaker 1>I respect Charles Watson and I know he's been attached

0:29:20.320 --> 0:29:22.239
<v Speaker 1>to the show before, so I respect the guy, but

0:29:22.600 --> 0:29:25.560
<v Speaker 1>he is I would not say, by the way, well, no,

0:29:25.640 --> 0:29:27.720
<v Speaker 1>it's just I think I look at it a little

0:29:27.760 --> 0:29:32.240
<v Speaker 1>differently than what it may actually be, but that that's

0:29:32.280 --> 0:29:35.240
<v Speaker 1>what it is, right, Here's here's here's what I would

0:29:35.280 --> 0:29:37.520
<v Speaker 1>say to that. If so the way that they vote,

0:29:37.520 --> 0:29:39.640
<v Speaker 1>and I think i've I've said this before on the show,

0:29:39.680 --> 0:29:42.720
<v Speaker 1>so I'm sorry if I'm repeating myself. Guys get handed

0:29:42.760 --> 0:29:45.840
<v Speaker 1>a blank list and it's one through twenty, and you say,

0:29:46.160 --> 0:29:48.560
<v Speaker 1>who are the top twenty players in the league, and

0:29:48.640 --> 0:29:52.360
<v Speaker 1>one is weighted higher than twenty um on down. So

0:29:52.960 --> 0:29:55.920
<v Speaker 1>my question is who's putting Matt Ryan in their top twenty?

0:29:56.040 --> 0:29:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Who's putting Charles wood Yeah, I mean my problem is

0:29:58.560 --> 0:30:01.640
<v Speaker 1>not so much that maybe people don't see Matt Ryan

0:30:01.800 --> 0:30:04.480
<v Speaker 1>in the top twenty, but that some of these other

0:30:04.520 --> 0:30:07.400
<v Speaker 1>guys that are shooting up ahead of him are getting votes.

0:30:07.560 --> 0:30:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Maybe your issue is the way the list is made

0:30:10.200 --> 0:30:12.560
<v Speaker 1>that would allow sin Derek Marks to be ahead of

0:30:12.600 --> 0:30:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Matt Ryan. Well, I don't have a problem with maybe

0:30:15.000 --> 0:30:19.120
<v Speaker 1>where Matt Ryan places among other quarterbacks, but yes, when

0:30:19.160 --> 0:30:21.200
<v Speaker 1>you have sin Derrick Marks ahead of him, I just

0:30:21.240 --> 0:30:23.200
<v Speaker 1>have a hard time saying that he isn't better or

0:30:23.200 --> 0:30:27.080
<v Speaker 1>more valuable players. Wes your turn. I don't want to

0:30:27.080 --> 0:30:31.200
<v Speaker 1>defy you in any way. Can I put both of

0:30:31.240 --> 0:30:34.160
<v Speaker 1>my guys here because they're kind of related. So I've

0:30:34.200 --> 0:30:36.800
<v Speaker 1>got Odell Beckham and Adrian Peterson. I think Beckham was

0:30:36.800 --> 0:30:40.200
<v Speaker 1>thirty two and Peterson was sixty two. From the time

0:30:40.280 --> 0:30:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Odell Beckham hit the starting lineup, he was the best

0:30:42.280 --> 0:30:45.200
<v Speaker 1>receiver in the NFL last year. And I don't think

0:30:45.200 --> 0:30:47.880
<v Speaker 1>that's even debatable. It's on film and the numbers show it.

0:30:48.600 --> 0:30:51.280
<v Speaker 1>However you want to sell it. Now. His detractors, his

0:30:51.360 --> 0:30:54.320
<v Speaker 1>detractors are really here, are crazy because they point to

0:30:54.360 --> 0:30:56.280
<v Speaker 1>the catch and they think he's only famous because of

0:30:56.360 --> 0:31:00.120
<v Speaker 1>the catch. But really the film shows everything that he's

0:31:00.160 --> 0:31:02.720
<v Speaker 1>just really that good and the catch really has nothing

0:31:02.760 --> 0:31:05.520
<v Speaker 1>to do with it. I mean, he's just really he's unstoppable.

0:31:05.560 --> 0:31:07.880
<v Speaker 1>So how can you get better than unstoppable. Okay, let

0:31:07.880 --> 0:31:10.400
<v Speaker 1>me jump in. So who that is ahead of him

0:31:10.400 --> 0:31:15.400
<v Speaker 1>at his position? Him ahead of every single one of them.

0:31:15.440 --> 0:31:18.480
<v Speaker 1>This is the better already than to marry as Thomas

0:31:18.600 --> 0:31:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Jordie Nelson says Bryant. Yes, purpose of this list is

0:31:22.400 --> 0:31:26.720
<v Speaker 1>how good are you going into two? Right? Right? From

0:31:26.800 --> 0:31:29.120
<v Speaker 1>everything we've seen out Odell Beckham from the time he

0:31:29.200 --> 0:31:31.480
<v Speaker 1>hit the starting lineup, he was better than all of

0:31:31.520 --> 0:31:34.280
<v Speaker 1>those wid are. Okay, I think I can help a

0:31:34.320 --> 0:31:36.800
<v Speaker 1>little bit if there's any disconnect. Lindsay West has something

0:31:36.880 --> 0:31:40.040
<v Speaker 1>that's called the Stable of Boys. And within this stable

0:31:40.080 --> 0:31:42.960
<v Speaker 1>there are certain players that are West's boys that he

0:31:43.040 --> 0:31:45.480
<v Speaker 1>keeps in a stable and they're all to himself, that

0:31:45.520 --> 0:31:48.440
<v Speaker 1>no one else knows about it, and West visited visits it,

0:31:48.600 --> 0:31:51.360
<v Speaker 1>and that they hang out. Now wait wait, wait, let

0:31:51.360 --> 0:31:53.800
<v Speaker 1>me finish now. But it's a very real thing. It's

0:31:53.840 --> 0:31:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Wes's guys that he loves. Odell Beckham stands above all

0:31:57.480 --> 0:32:00.440
<v Speaker 1>those other Stable of Boys guys. And he even has

0:32:00.520 --> 0:32:03.680
<v Speaker 1>a penthouse in the stable that's just Odell Beckham. So

0:32:03.720 --> 0:32:06.040
<v Speaker 1>that's why West is so passionate, because it's his favorite

0:32:06.040 --> 0:32:08.920
<v Speaker 1>player in football. I'm that passionate because if you watch

0:32:09.320 --> 0:32:11.560
<v Speaker 1>these players playing, a lot of analysts to do this

0:32:11.600 --> 0:32:14.560
<v Speaker 1>for a living. If you watch Odell Beckham play and

0:32:14.600 --> 0:32:16.760
<v Speaker 1>you are and you don't walk away thinking he's one

0:32:16.800 --> 0:32:19.120
<v Speaker 1>of the best players in the NFL, your I for

0:32:19.240 --> 0:32:22.320
<v Speaker 1>football doesn't work. It just doesn't. But you just think.

0:32:22.360 --> 0:32:24.320
<v Speaker 1>I think the question is, so we've seen him do

0:32:24.360 --> 0:32:29.280
<v Speaker 1>it for however many games he played last year? Uh, okay,

0:32:29.320 --> 0:32:30.840
<v Speaker 1>there you go, thank you. I was hoping somebody was

0:32:30.840 --> 0:32:35.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna get the exact number, so twelve games. And I

0:32:35.560 --> 0:32:37.320
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of people just want to see him

0:32:37.360 --> 0:32:39.400
<v Speaker 1>do it again. They want to see defenses adjust, they

0:32:39.400 --> 0:32:41.360
<v Speaker 1>want to see him with a legitimate wide receiver on

0:32:41.400 --> 0:32:45.360
<v Speaker 1>the other side. Umah, that's fair. And you have to

0:32:45.720 --> 0:32:48.280
<v Speaker 1>And what about the idea of this list coming in

0:32:48.280 --> 0:32:50.600
<v Speaker 1>at thirty two after one year? As anyone ever been

0:32:50.640 --> 0:32:52.480
<v Speaker 1>that high on this list in the six years or

0:32:52.480 --> 0:32:55.880
<v Speaker 1>whatever that we've done this after one season. That's Andrew

0:32:55.920 --> 0:33:00.320
<v Speaker 1>luck is one of the few. Okay, I think part

0:33:00.320 --> 0:33:04.040
<v Speaker 1>of what you said before, Charles is the respect factor. Right, Well,

0:33:04.280 --> 0:33:07.800
<v Speaker 1>there's well, the problem with this list is that it's

0:33:07.800 --> 0:33:10.520
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be how good is this player going into

0:33:10.520 --> 0:33:13.080
<v Speaker 1>the fifteen season and This is where I bring in

0:33:13.120 --> 0:33:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Adrian Peterson as well, because last year we dealt with

0:33:15.720 --> 0:33:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the same thing with Julio Jones, who didn't make the

0:33:17.600 --> 0:33:20.400
<v Speaker 1>top one hundred because he missed eleven games. So if

0:33:20.440 --> 0:33:23.520
<v Speaker 1>you're injured the previous year, the players forget about you.

0:33:24.240 --> 0:33:27.280
<v Speaker 1>So Adrian Peterson missed fifteen games, the players put him

0:33:27.280 --> 0:33:29.840
<v Speaker 1>at sixty two, And I guess my point is you

0:33:29.840 --> 0:33:32.160
<v Speaker 1>could make the argument Adrian Peterson's the best running back

0:33:32.160 --> 0:33:34.160
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL. Odell Beckan is the best wide receiver.

0:33:34.400 --> 0:33:36.800
<v Speaker 1>These guys are top five NFL players, not thirty two

0:33:36.800 --> 0:33:40.160
<v Speaker 1>and sixty two. Yeah, I would say I think Peterson

0:33:40.280 --> 0:33:45.640
<v Speaker 1>was nearer the top five last year, right humbled. Number

0:33:45.640 --> 0:33:48.960
<v Speaker 1>four obviously is a fair spot for him, And I

0:33:49.320 --> 0:33:51.080
<v Speaker 1>guess I don't have a problem with after missing the

0:33:51.240 --> 0:33:54.360
<v Speaker 1>entire season, maybe docking him a little bit, and it's

0:33:54.400 --> 0:33:56.320
<v Speaker 1>a little show me that you still are the top

0:33:56.360 --> 0:33:58.840
<v Speaker 1>five guy. I get why he's lower. I don't even

0:33:58.840 --> 0:34:00.600
<v Speaker 1>think it has anything to do with I don't think

0:34:00.680 --> 0:34:03.920
<v Speaker 1>anyone thinks that he's the sixty second best players in

0:34:03.920 --> 0:34:06.160
<v Speaker 1>the league. I think what you have here are players

0:34:06.240 --> 0:34:08.759
<v Speaker 1>that vote based on two thousand fourteen, so they say,

0:34:08.800 --> 0:34:11.080
<v Speaker 1>he didn't play in two thousand fourteen, so I can't

0:34:11.080 --> 0:34:12.799
<v Speaker 1>put him on my list at all. And then you

0:34:12.800 --> 0:34:15.239
<v Speaker 1>have other players that say, who's the best player in

0:34:15.280 --> 0:34:17.759
<v Speaker 1>the league. Well, clearly it's Adrian Peterson and he's near

0:34:17.800 --> 0:34:19.759
<v Speaker 1>the top of their list. So that's how he ends

0:34:19.800 --> 0:34:22.840
<v Speaker 1>up in the middle. Like when Peyton didn't play, he

0:34:22.880 --> 0:34:27.239
<v Speaker 1>didn't clarification when they go into the voters booth. I

0:34:27.239 --> 0:34:32.080
<v Speaker 1>I agree, but that's not I would like to sit

0:34:32.200 --> 0:34:37.719
<v Speaker 1>next to every Uh. I'd like to handle. Here is

0:34:37.760 --> 0:34:41.080
<v Speaker 1>the criterias. We don't have to argue about it. I'd

0:34:41.080 --> 0:34:45.200
<v Speaker 1>love that. Could you tell NFL dot com readers the same? All? Uh,

0:34:45.280 --> 0:34:47.920
<v Speaker 1>you know the reputation thing they gotta I know the

0:34:47.960 --> 0:34:50.759
<v Speaker 1>players they vote on this. They respect these guys. But

0:34:50.920 --> 0:34:53.160
<v Speaker 1>I'll name both of mine right now and then we'll

0:34:53.200 --> 0:34:54.799
<v Speaker 1>throw it back to you, Mark to close it. But

0:34:55.000 --> 0:34:57.279
<v Speaker 1>Adam vin Atieri, who had a very nice season at

0:34:57.320 --> 0:35:00.799
<v Speaker 1>age seven thousand, whatever it is, Uh, I love me

0:35:00.840 --> 0:35:03.680
<v Speaker 1>some event, even as a Jets fan. I respect Vinitary

0:35:03.760 --> 0:35:05.200
<v Speaker 1>for what he's done in his career, and he's going

0:35:05.200 --> 0:35:07.319
<v Speaker 1>to the Hall of Fame or he should. But he

0:35:07.400 --> 0:35:09.520
<v Speaker 1>is not the best player in the NFL. And by

0:35:09.520 --> 0:35:13.600
<v Speaker 1>the way, Randall Cobb two spots below him, show me

0:35:13.640 --> 0:35:16.480
<v Speaker 1>one GM and I know that's not that would take

0:35:18.640 --> 0:35:20.920
<v Speaker 1>this is easy. Grandall Cobb just signed for ten million

0:35:20.920 --> 0:35:23.239
<v Speaker 1>dollar a year. Let me know when minitary makes ten

0:35:23.239 --> 0:35:26.120
<v Speaker 1>million dollars in a five year span or whatever. So well,

0:35:26.280 --> 0:35:28.279
<v Speaker 1>I almost have to hand it to the players were

0:35:28.280 --> 0:35:31.080
<v Speaker 1>showing a little bit of respect for kickers who are

0:35:31.120 --> 0:35:33.680
<v Speaker 1>part of the game. He shouldn't be here. Come on, enough, Adam,

0:35:33.719 --> 0:35:35.920
<v Speaker 1>you've had You've had a nice life. And the other

0:35:35.960 --> 0:35:37.279
<v Speaker 1>one I have an issue with. I want you to

0:35:37.280 --> 0:35:39.160
<v Speaker 1>at least stats all right you, I'm sure you could

0:35:39.200 --> 0:35:43.160
<v Speaker 1>guess who this is. But here we go, uh sixty

0:35:43.239 --> 0:35:48.960
<v Speaker 1>seven completion percentage and fifty two yards, thirty two touchdowns,

0:35:49.040 --> 0:35:52.080
<v Speaker 1>nine interceptions, a hundred and three point three passer rating.

0:35:53.000 --> 0:35:58.759
<v Speaker 1>That's Ben Roethlisberger. And this guy is incredible, and he's

0:35:58.800 --> 0:36:01.280
<v Speaker 1>been incredible for many year is and he's actually getting

0:36:01.320 --> 0:36:03.840
<v Speaker 1>better now that he's around a great offense. So his

0:36:03.920 --> 0:36:09.360
<v Speaker 1>placement I believe he is in well that is you know,

0:36:09.480 --> 0:36:11.680
<v Speaker 1>that's great shakes, that's a nice spot to be. I

0:36:11.680 --> 0:36:15.000
<v Speaker 1>think Ben Roethlisberger has earned the right to be thought

0:36:15.000 --> 0:36:17.960
<v Speaker 1>of as maybe a top ten player or at the

0:36:18.080 --> 0:36:20.280
<v Speaker 1>very least to be in the group that was revealed

0:36:20.480 --> 0:36:23.520
<v Speaker 1>on Wednesday, which isn't that next tier up to eleven,

0:36:23.520 --> 0:36:25.840
<v Speaker 1>which are some real heavy hitters. Ben Roethlisberger is a

0:36:25.840 --> 0:36:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Hall of Famer uh and a guy in his prime

0:36:28.719 --> 0:36:31.360
<v Speaker 1>right now that's just gonna break every record the Steelers

0:36:31.360 --> 0:36:33.600
<v Speaker 1>have ever had or he already has. Probably he should

0:36:33.600 --> 0:36:36.000
<v Speaker 1>be higher on this list. One note on Ben, because

0:36:36.200 --> 0:36:38.080
<v Speaker 1>this was where I wanted to go initially before Dan

0:36:38.120 --> 0:36:41.160
<v Speaker 1>pick Ben, was that as a someone that's watched Big

0:36:41.200 --> 0:36:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Ben torch the Cleveland Browns four thousand times, we've had

0:36:45.920 --> 0:36:48.839
<v Speaker 1>Joe Hayden and Joe Thomas and our team during many

0:36:48.880 --> 0:36:52.080
<v Speaker 1>of those losses, two great players and foundational players. But

0:36:52.360 --> 0:36:55.799
<v Speaker 1>you cannot tell me that if you switched in a

0:36:55.960 --> 0:36:59.279
<v Speaker 1>roster switch you gave the Steelers Joe Hayden and you

0:36:59.360 --> 0:37:02.200
<v Speaker 1>gave the brown and spend Roethlisberger for the next four years,

0:37:02.360 --> 0:37:05.239
<v Speaker 1>that the Browns are on a much better team. Raight,

0:37:05.360 --> 0:37:08.239
<v Speaker 1>Joe Thomas and Joe Hayden for Big absolutely, because it

0:37:08.280 --> 0:37:11.120
<v Speaker 1>comes down for me with this is positional value too,

0:37:11.160 --> 0:37:14.719
<v Speaker 1>and big Big Ben belongs twenty spots hired, have no

0:37:14.800 --> 0:37:18.040
<v Speaker 1>problem with it. Uh, And I'm looking at lindsay the

0:37:18.160 --> 0:37:20.799
<v Speaker 1>twenty eleven revealed did we have any qbs on that?

0:37:21.120 --> 0:37:24.000
<v Speaker 1>I believe we don't. We didn't. So do you know

0:37:24.000 --> 0:37:25.759
<v Speaker 1>how many of your laft how many quarterboks? All right,

0:37:27.239 --> 0:37:30.120
<v Speaker 1>that's good, and I guess we can. Uh, you know,

0:37:30.160 --> 0:37:32.200
<v Speaker 1>take a guess what they are. But I would say

0:37:32.239 --> 0:37:35.280
<v Speaker 1>any of the four that have clearly Rogers, Brady, Peyton

0:37:35.280 --> 0:37:39.560
<v Speaker 1>and Luck Okay, So are we upset that Roethlisberger is

0:37:39.719 --> 0:37:42.000
<v Speaker 1>behind those guys? Should he be ahead of should be

0:37:42.040 --> 0:37:45.240
<v Speaker 1>way ahead of Peyton Mail? No, way ahead of Peyton Manning.

0:37:45.360 --> 0:37:47.240
<v Speaker 1>This is the way you remember that the players vote

0:37:47.680 --> 0:37:50.160
<v Speaker 1>in the player of respect for Peyton Manning. See that

0:37:50.239 --> 0:37:54.160
<v Speaker 1>You're right? Well, is that not valid though? Peyton? I

0:37:54.200 --> 0:37:56.920
<v Speaker 1>totally agree. Well, we're not voting for two thousand thirteen.

0:37:56.960 --> 0:37:59.400
<v Speaker 1>We're voting, right, But I thought we couldn't throw in

0:37:59.400 --> 0:38:00.920
<v Speaker 1>the last eight games of the year. So, but I

0:38:00.920 --> 0:38:04.080
<v Speaker 1>thought we were also saying he was hurt and he's

0:38:04.120 --> 0:38:06.359
<v Speaker 1>healthy now, so you don't know if he is. You

0:38:06.440 --> 0:38:09.879
<v Speaker 1>have no ideas, like you don't is the same guy anymore? No? No, no,

0:38:10.000 --> 0:38:12.600
<v Speaker 1>there's no injury concerns with Adrian Peterson. We don't know

0:38:12.640 --> 0:38:15.120
<v Speaker 1>if Peyton Manning can throw. We don't know that he can't.

0:38:15.360 --> 0:38:18.160
<v Speaker 1>And until I know that Peyton Manning cannot throw, I

0:38:18.200 --> 0:38:21.360
<v Speaker 1>want Peyton Manning every day. But we do know that,

0:38:22.080 --> 0:38:24.120
<v Speaker 1>we do know that he was the problem and they're

0:38:24.120 --> 0:38:26.960
<v Speaker 1>lost to the courts because he couldn't throw, and we don't.

0:38:27.000 --> 0:38:30.319
<v Speaker 1>To me, he's that's on tape. That happened. But you

0:38:30.440 --> 0:38:32.840
<v Speaker 1>have to consider the problem isn't Peyton Manning being in

0:38:32.880 --> 0:38:35.840
<v Speaker 1>the top ten because you simply can't ask NFL players

0:38:35.880 --> 0:38:38.080
<v Speaker 1>to vote differently at this point, after after what he's

0:38:38.080 --> 0:38:40.479
<v Speaker 1>been in the league. The problem is Big Ben being

0:38:40.520 --> 0:38:44.520
<v Speaker 1>disrespected the way he was. Something's wrong in the perception there.

0:38:44.200 --> 0:38:48.759
<v Speaker 1>I do wonder Russell Wilson is ahead of him, and

0:38:48.840 --> 0:38:53.400
<v Speaker 1>I I probably wouldn't have done that myself and Russell Wilson.

0:38:53.440 --> 0:38:56.479
<v Speaker 1>By the way I wrote our reaction piece last week,

0:38:56.960 --> 0:39:00.279
<v Speaker 1>it's just the way sports work. If the hand it

0:39:00.280 --> 0:39:03.319
<v Speaker 1>off to Marshawn Lynch or Malcolm Butler doesn't exist and

0:39:03.360 --> 0:39:05.760
<v Speaker 1>they win the second Super Bowl, I think Russell Wilson's

0:39:05.800 --> 0:39:08.120
<v Speaker 1>the top ten player on this list, but it's just

0:39:08.160 --> 0:39:11.879
<v Speaker 1>one player can do that, it points that it's that big. See.

0:39:11.880 --> 0:39:13.839
<v Speaker 1>I think I think it's interesting because you're looking at

0:39:13.880 --> 0:39:16.560
<v Speaker 1>this list more from like a this guy is twenty

0:39:16.600 --> 0:39:19.680
<v Speaker 1>seven and there's no way, or well, specifically Ben Roethlisberger

0:39:19.840 --> 0:39:22.320
<v Speaker 1>twenty six and there's no way there's twenty five players

0:39:22.360 --> 0:39:26.200
<v Speaker 1>that you'd rather take prior to drafting Ben Roethlisberger for

0:39:26.200 --> 0:39:28.680
<v Speaker 1>your team. I tend to look at it more as

0:39:29.160 --> 0:39:32.120
<v Speaker 1>like positional rankings, because I think it makes sense that

0:39:32.160 --> 0:39:35.000
<v Speaker 1>you're only going to if you're listing twenty names, you're

0:39:35.000 --> 0:39:36.920
<v Speaker 1>only going to come up with a handful of quarterbacks,

0:39:36.920 --> 0:39:38.879
<v Speaker 1>and then you're gonna go, Okay, who else is really good?

0:39:38.880 --> 0:39:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Who's the best cornerback? I'm gonna vote for that guy,

0:39:41.200 --> 0:39:43.799
<v Speaker 1>who's the best safety, that guy who's the best defensive tackle.

0:39:43.840 --> 0:39:46.759
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna throw other positions on there so that you

0:39:46.800 --> 0:39:49.160
<v Speaker 1>fill out your list, and so I I never get

0:39:49.160 --> 0:39:51.200
<v Speaker 1>really hung up on the fact that he's lower on

0:39:51.239 --> 0:39:53.160
<v Speaker 1>the list, although I think that's a totally valid way

0:39:53.160 --> 0:39:55.319
<v Speaker 1>of looking at it. Obviously it's the top one, not

0:39:55.360 --> 0:39:59.280
<v Speaker 1>the top six. Uh, you know, corners in the top

0:39:59.400 --> 0:40:02.520
<v Speaker 1>twelve running backs or I think you're you're absolutely right

0:40:02.560 --> 0:40:04.640
<v Speaker 1>now and I know I realized I'm kind of just

0:40:05.000 --> 0:40:06.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, spitting in the wind on this. But it's

0:40:06.880 --> 0:40:09.360
<v Speaker 1>it's like I I would like the top ten or

0:40:09.360 --> 0:40:12.000
<v Speaker 1>fifteen just to be quarterbacks, but that's just not what

0:40:12.120 --> 0:40:14.480
<v Speaker 1>the exercises. And I get that. We talked about, you know,

0:40:14.480 --> 0:40:18.000
<v Speaker 1>coming up with natural nicknames. We struggled with with my

0:40:18.160 --> 0:40:22.399
<v Speaker 1>nickname with Lindsay, but naturally just dropped the cess at

0:40:22.480 --> 0:40:26.600
<v Speaker 1>mark And that's that's what it's about. That's natural, that's pure.

0:40:26.760 --> 0:40:28.600
<v Speaker 1>But that's that's like half of his name. That's not

0:40:28.640 --> 0:40:32.640
<v Speaker 1>even like that's not a witty nickname. But I just

0:40:32.719 --> 0:40:34.440
<v Speaker 1>think it speaks to the growing bond of the four

0:40:34.480 --> 0:40:37.520
<v Speaker 1>people in this room right now. Either way, I get

0:40:37.719 --> 0:40:41.040
<v Speaker 1>ripped on Twitter for not having come through on the

0:40:41.040 --> 0:40:46.879
<v Speaker 1>old zuser. People are very angry. They're probably about three

0:40:46.920 --> 0:40:52.480
<v Speaker 1>people that are. But uh yeah, listen, Lindsey did the

0:40:52.480 --> 0:40:55.520
<v Speaker 1>best she could. I mean, she failed, but you know

0:40:55.719 --> 0:40:58.200
<v Speaker 1>she tried. All right, let's move on. That's it. That's

0:40:58.200 --> 0:41:02.680
<v Speaker 1>the Top One again. Lindsay hosting the Top One reaction

0:41:02.719 --> 0:41:06.680
<v Speaker 1>show immediately following the two hour and a little a

0:41:06.680 --> 0:41:09.840
<v Speaker 1>little bloated, but two hour Tuesday Night at ten p m. Eastern.

0:41:09.920 --> 0:41:13.040
<v Speaker 1>We have a one hour review preview show. So if

0:41:13.080 --> 0:41:14.600
<v Speaker 1>you need to get caught up on what you have

0:41:14.719 --> 0:41:17.560
<v Speaker 1>missed so far, if you have, god forbid missed any

0:41:17.560 --> 0:41:21.399
<v Speaker 1>of the shows, you've got to be a completest here exactly, Dan,

0:41:21.800 --> 0:41:24.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, very smoothly going right past my second gripe

0:41:24.520 --> 0:41:26.840
<v Speaker 1>with the list I think I've had. I've had enough gripes.

0:41:26.880 --> 0:41:31.080
<v Speaker 1>I've had enough. Alright, throw it out there. Vante Davis

0:41:31.160 --> 0:41:34.480
<v Speaker 1>fifty nine, you kid me, come on, shut down corner

0:41:34.520 --> 0:41:37.000
<v Speaker 1>and not he's the last rated cornerback. You want to

0:41:37.000 --> 0:41:39.680
<v Speaker 1>take Vante Davis over Connor Barwin? I might. I think

0:41:39.680 --> 0:41:41.319
<v Speaker 1>it might have something to do with even showed it

0:41:41.320 --> 0:41:44.120
<v Speaker 1>today on NFL Network, the Hard Knocks episode where he

0:41:44.160 --> 0:41:46.759
<v Speaker 1>cried and called his grandmother when he got traded from

0:41:46.760 --> 0:41:49.560
<v Speaker 1>the Dolphins. Players have not forgotten that yet. Why that

0:41:49.640 --> 0:41:52.040
<v Speaker 1>seems tender and human? Not in the NFL has no

0:41:52.080 --> 0:41:54.399
<v Speaker 1>such thing as being Anyways, that's the end of sorry

0:41:54.400 --> 0:42:00.120
<v Speaker 1>about that, Mark says, sorry, Old says all right, moving on, hey,

0:42:00.160 --> 0:42:02.000
<v Speaker 1>before we get to the mail bag. And of course

0:42:02.040 --> 0:42:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Connor or who again? I tell Connor a certain time

0:42:04.960 --> 0:42:06.880
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna happen, and it just leaves the guy by

0:42:06.880 --> 0:42:09.200
<v Speaker 1>the phone in the woods in New Jersey. It's gonna

0:42:09.200 --> 0:42:11.600
<v Speaker 1>be a little later, Connor. Sorry about that, buddy, but

0:42:12.080 --> 0:42:15.880
<v Speaker 1>let's um stop down a second. And we picked our

0:42:15.920 --> 0:42:21.120
<v Speaker 1>favorite nineties one hit wonder And on Wednesday, Lindsay was

0:42:21.160 --> 0:42:23.600
<v Speaker 1>a hard planning planning a t A. I think you

0:42:23.640 --> 0:42:26.080
<v Speaker 1>were doing total access a couple of days ago. Where

0:42:26.120 --> 0:42:28.160
<v Speaker 1>was the top on Hunter Prep whatever? And I said,

0:42:28.160 --> 0:42:29.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm just gonna leave this post it right here on

0:42:29.640 --> 0:42:32.880
<v Speaker 1>your desk. What's your favorite one hit wonder of the nineties?

0:42:32.880 --> 0:42:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Too busy for you to talk to me exactly? No,

0:42:35.920 --> 0:42:38.840
<v Speaker 1>no eye contact aloud with Lindsay, not in the studio,

0:42:39.000 --> 0:42:41.520
<v Speaker 1>just a hand straight up in the air. Time. Lindsay

0:42:42.160 --> 0:42:44.480
<v Speaker 1>didn't come through on my nickname, did come through with

0:42:44.560 --> 0:42:47.759
<v Speaker 1>her one hit wonder. And here it is. Have you

0:42:47.800 --> 0:42:58.279
<v Speaker 1>ever met a girl? This is Lindsay introducing just a friend. Yes,

0:42:59.040 --> 0:43:02.239
<v Speaker 1>this puts a smile on your face. Absolutely. There are

0:43:02.239 --> 0:43:04.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of songs from the nineties, and I will

0:43:04.120 --> 0:43:06.520
<v Speaker 1>admit I googled one hit wonders from the nineties just

0:43:06.560 --> 0:43:08.600
<v Speaker 1>to refresh my memory's fine, and a lot of them

0:43:08.600 --> 0:43:10.759
<v Speaker 1>were like if you don't really if that song comes on.

0:43:10.800 --> 0:43:14.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm kind of annoyed it's played too much, you know,

0:43:16.440 --> 0:43:18.200
<v Speaker 1>but this one makes me smile, and then you don't

0:43:18.239 --> 0:43:21.480
<v Speaker 1>really hear it very frequently. This was one of my finalists. Yes,

0:43:21.560 --> 0:43:25.400
<v Speaker 1>it was. In fact, I knew I knew there was

0:43:25.440 --> 0:43:28.560
<v Speaker 1>something about us um. And then there was the video

0:43:28.600 --> 0:43:31.000
<v Speaker 1>which I watched today, which was funny. It opens with

0:43:31.040 --> 0:43:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Bismarcki and his friends all piled onto a park bench.

0:43:34.200 --> 0:43:38.640
<v Speaker 1>It's the most Homerotic thing since Rocky and Apollo on

0:43:38.719 --> 0:43:41.480
<v Speaker 1>the Beach and Rocky too. I mean, these guys are

0:43:41.560 --> 0:43:43.600
<v Speaker 1>all over each other. It's it's nice to see though

0:43:44.200 --> 0:43:46.960
<v Speaker 1>they're friends. Am I let's talk about that. I don't know.

0:43:47.040 --> 0:43:51.320
<v Speaker 1>It seems fun. Listen, but you say he's just a friend,

0:43:52.080 --> 0:43:56.120
<v Speaker 1>but you would say he's just a oh baby. He

0:43:56.320 --> 0:44:00.160
<v Speaker 1>taking it to the limit. See this is authentic. Is

0:44:00.200 --> 0:44:04.040
<v Speaker 1>the story of my entire high school experience. It is

0:44:04.080 --> 0:44:06.760
<v Speaker 1>it is the lyrics really do check out? I agree

0:44:06.800 --> 0:44:10.040
<v Speaker 1>with you, Marke. Uh So anyway, there it is Lindseay's

0:44:10.080 --> 0:44:12.919
<v Speaker 1>one hit wonder uh TD do you have want to show?

0:44:12.960 --> 0:44:15.759
<v Speaker 1>Oh man? Nineties music man, That's that's where I grew up.

0:44:15.920 --> 0:44:18.319
<v Speaker 1>So I got I got, I got something. All right,

0:44:18.760 --> 0:44:19.920
<v Speaker 1>all right, you want to hear it? All right, just

0:44:20.000 --> 0:44:23.560
<v Speaker 1>do it might not have here this one, but it's

0:44:23.560 --> 0:44:28.719
<v Speaker 1>a it's a classic. Whoa this was This was my

0:44:28.880 --> 0:44:34.839
<v Speaker 1>number two during your suspension. A great video, by the way, fantastic.

0:44:35.120 --> 0:44:38.000
<v Speaker 1>This is me levin old me summertime and in London.

0:44:38.160 --> 0:44:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Spent a lot of summers doing the late nineties in London.

0:44:40.239 --> 0:44:42.719
<v Speaker 1>And this is going to the tube, going from mato

0:44:42.760 --> 0:44:46.239
<v Speaker 1>Ville to Piccadilly Circus and truck and Darrow and having

0:44:46.280 --> 0:44:49.200
<v Speaker 1>a fun time like some some nineties song. And even

0:44:49.360 --> 0:44:51.359
<v Speaker 1>I love the Bismarcki song. But it's a little like,

0:44:51.680 --> 0:44:53.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, kitchy and a little fun in a cheesy way.

0:44:54.360 --> 0:44:56.560
<v Speaker 1>This is just a legitimately great song, good song. I'm

0:44:56.560 --> 0:44:58.760
<v Speaker 1>just all in on you guys. There's a striking where'd

0:44:58.760 --> 0:45:02.200
<v Speaker 1>you go to Webster's otter? By the way, there's the

0:45:02.239 --> 0:45:08.319
<v Speaker 1>football time, wasn't he? His sister was like, yep, he

0:45:08.440 --> 0:45:13.600
<v Speaker 1>came and went very quickly. Was that the Buffalo Buffalo

0:45:13.640 --> 0:45:18.000
<v Speaker 1>stan Yeah, yeah, Buffalo stance. Yeah. I was predicting camp

0:45:18.040 --> 0:45:20.520
<v Speaker 1>below for you say. I wanted to go to something different.

0:45:20.520 --> 0:45:21.920
<v Speaker 1>I want to go to something that you know, And

0:45:22.120 --> 0:45:24.560
<v Speaker 1>I went back home a couple of like a month

0:45:24.560 --> 0:45:26.440
<v Speaker 1>ago for my sister's wedding, and for some reason this

0:45:26.480 --> 0:45:28.000
<v Speaker 1>song came back up and I was like, man, this

0:45:28.160 --> 0:45:32.120
<v Speaker 1>took me way back to the good old days, like five,

0:45:32.560 --> 0:45:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Can I drop one more? Possible to drop one more? Sure?

0:45:38.719 --> 0:45:41.399
<v Speaker 1>Go ahead? Alright, there's another nineties classic from the lunch

0:45:41.640 --> 0:45:48.120
<v Speaker 1>some of days who liked this one back here? It's good.

0:45:52.400 --> 0:45:57.200
<v Speaker 1>There you go. You can only play this during the summer,

0:45:58.040 --> 0:45:59.840
<v Speaker 1>and I feel like we almost have to be driving

0:45:59.840 --> 0:46:04.600
<v Speaker 1>a convertible. S fast movement. That video, which randomly directed

0:46:04.600 --> 0:46:06.719
<v Speaker 1>by a Tim Story who did Fantastic four, I think,

0:46:06.760 --> 0:46:10.440
<v Speaker 1>like a man random but it's it's essentially just what

0:46:11.120 --> 0:46:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Lindsay described. A lot of fast moving, a lot of pace.

0:46:14.320 --> 0:46:17.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, that's good. Good pick TD. The producers always

0:46:17.400 --> 0:46:19.520
<v Speaker 1>looking to drop two or more, and Sully tried to

0:46:19.520 --> 0:46:21.520
<v Speaker 1>do the same thing to me. He picked Blue though,

0:46:21.520 --> 0:46:28.160
<v Speaker 1>which is obviously Iffel thirty nine sixty. There we go, classic. Alright,

0:46:28.160 --> 0:46:31.040
<v Speaker 1>that's good, alright, So let's hit the mailbag. Good job, everybody,

0:46:31.080 --> 0:46:33.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of good choices. We should put together some

0:46:33.120 --> 0:46:36.520
<v Speaker 1>type of Spotify playlist with our one hit wonders. Well,

0:46:36.719 --> 0:46:41.239
<v Speaker 1>if that's what they are horrifying. That's that's so let's

0:46:41.239 --> 0:46:43.480
<v Speaker 1>go through the mail bag and I hit some questions

0:46:44.400 --> 0:46:46.719
<v Speaker 1>before we get Connor on the phone. How about this

0:46:46.719 --> 0:46:50.239
<v Speaker 1>one this from Tim Cummings at Tim C zero two

0:46:50.280 --> 0:46:53.480
<v Speaker 1>one too, which written off team is most likely to

0:46:53.520 --> 0:46:57.920
<v Speaker 1>shock us all and win double digit games? So let's

0:46:57.920 --> 0:47:00.560
<v Speaker 1>go with teams and and actually here's a good way

0:47:00.560 --> 0:47:02.759
<v Speaker 1>to do this. There we on our last week's show,

0:47:02.760 --> 0:47:05.879
<v Speaker 1>we had we picked ten teams, uh that we said

0:47:05.920 --> 0:47:07.400
<v Speaker 1>had no chance of going to the super Bowl. So

0:47:07.480 --> 0:47:09.480
<v Speaker 1>let me just pull that up and the Bengals don't

0:47:09.560 --> 0:47:11.759
<v Speaker 1>count and we're not counting the Bengals. And I in

0:47:11.800 --> 0:47:14.000
<v Speaker 1>my mail bag, I pulled them out too, because they're

0:47:14.040 --> 0:47:16.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna win ten games and then lose the first game exactly. Well,

0:47:16.600 --> 0:47:19.040
<v Speaker 1>it's been to four straight playoffs, so that's not a shocker.

0:47:19.239 --> 0:47:21.120
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna do what they do in retrospect. When I

0:47:21.160 --> 0:47:23.399
<v Speaker 1>was writing in the mailbag, we probably should have pulled

0:47:23.400 --> 0:47:25.440
<v Speaker 1>them because they definitely stick out like sort thumb. But

0:47:26.200 --> 0:47:28.440
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's an emotional pick the Bengals. Here here

0:47:28.440 --> 0:47:31.680
<v Speaker 1>are the ten teams ready or nine teams? I should

0:47:31.719 --> 0:47:36.399
<v Speaker 1>say that we decided we're out in terms of winning

0:47:36.400 --> 0:47:37.759
<v Speaker 1>a Super Bowl. So which one of these teams could

0:47:37.760 --> 0:47:47.960
<v Speaker 1>win ten games is the question. Here we go Bears, Buccaneers, Browns, Jaguars, Raiders, Redskins, Texans, Titans,

0:47:48.520 --> 0:47:53.480
<v Speaker 1>and the Niners. Mark, I'll start with you. I'll go Texans.

0:47:54.280 --> 0:47:57.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean they won nine last year. I like their coach.

0:47:57.440 --> 0:47:59.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that they I don't like their quarterback situation

0:47:59.719 --> 0:48:01.719
<v Speaker 1>at all, but that's a soft division that you can

0:48:01.760 --> 0:48:05.400
<v Speaker 1>probably continue to inflate your win total and if things

0:48:05.480 --> 0:48:09.560
<v Speaker 1>went right, they could win ten. Well, I'll agree with

0:48:09.600 --> 0:48:12.239
<v Speaker 1>that one. I think they're actually gonna have fewer wins

0:48:12.280 --> 0:48:14.880
<v Speaker 1>this year because their schedules much harder. But out of

0:48:14.920 --> 0:48:18.320
<v Speaker 1>all of these teams, I think they have the most talent.

0:48:19.280 --> 0:48:21.839
<v Speaker 1>And I could see I've knocked Brian Hoyer quite a bit,

0:48:21.880 --> 0:48:23.560
<v Speaker 1>but I could see him at the command of a

0:48:23.600 --> 0:48:26.640
<v Speaker 1>ball control offense that wins ten games. Uh, you know

0:48:26.680 --> 0:48:30.360
<v Speaker 1>what I Mark, The Browns are eighting three last year. No,

0:48:30.520 --> 0:48:34.000
<v Speaker 1>they were right seven and nine, but they were eight

0:48:34.040 --> 0:48:39.240
<v Speaker 1>and three, were four and then their quarterback play fell apart.

0:48:39.320 --> 0:48:41.839
<v Speaker 1>This is still there's still pieces on this roster. What if,

0:48:41.920 --> 0:48:46.759
<v Speaker 1>just what if Josh McCown was good or decent. There's no,

0:48:46.880 --> 0:48:49.040
<v Speaker 1>it's not crazy that the Browns could win ten games.

0:48:49.040 --> 0:48:51.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna say the Browns of that list have a chance.

0:48:51.960 --> 0:48:54.120
<v Speaker 1>That division, though, is what I would say, is the

0:48:54.160 --> 0:48:56.040
<v Speaker 1>opposite of the a f C. South. That Mark's not

0:48:56.120 --> 0:48:58.400
<v Speaker 1>having your hope this year. No, I'm trying hard to

0:48:58.440 --> 0:49:01.600
<v Speaker 1>get it in you. How about how about the how

0:49:01.640 --> 0:49:05.760
<v Speaker 1>about the Portraits Awards? How about the Bucks? And Jamis

0:49:05.760 --> 0:49:08.640
<v Speaker 1>Winston in a bad division hits the ground running. They

0:49:08.640 --> 0:49:11.040
<v Speaker 1>don't have enough in a way we go. They don't

0:49:11.040 --> 0:49:13.560
<v Speaker 1>have enough depth and not enough good players, all right,

0:49:13.880 --> 0:49:17.360
<v Speaker 1>and that's they've just got so far to go. I agree, alright,

0:49:17.400 --> 0:49:21.480
<v Speaker 1>so both mine are terrible. That's fine, lindsay. I'm I

0:49:21.520 --> 0:49:23.640
<v Speaker 1>guess I like the Texans. I don't think that's a

0:49:23.640 --> 0:49:27.200
<v Speaker 1>good option. Um, I don't believe in this at all.

0:49:27.400 --> 0:49:31.680
<v Speaker 1>But um maybe the Bears just because they're the closest. Alright, Like,

0:49:31.719 --> 0:49:34.439
<v Speaker 1>if for whatever reason, Jay Cutler doesn't suck next year,

0:49:35.520 --> 0:49:39.520
<v Speaker 1>then maybe good coaching staff. I mean, good defense obviously

0:49:39.560 --> 0:49:43.040
<v Speaker 1>needs some work, but I think I feel like they're

0:49:43.040 --> 0:49:47.560
<v Speaker 1>the closest and last year that was inexplicable, Like why

0:49:47.600 --> 0:49:49.279
<v Speaker 1>were they as bad as they were? It doesn't make

0:49:49.320 --> 0:49:53.319
<v Speaker 1>any sense to me. I think the anomaly. Yeah, I

0:49:53.360 --> 0:49:55.719
<v Speaker 1>think the problem on defense is that all of their

0:49:55.760 --> 0:49:58.640
<v Speaker 1>players are suited for the four three scheme that they had,

0:49:58.640 --> 0:50:01.560
<v Speaker 1>and now they're running a three four and it's opposite

0:50:01.560 --> 0:50:03.440
<v Speaker 1>of Denver where they're bringing in at three four and

0:50:03.440 --> 0:50:05.839
<v Speaker 1>all their players actually fit the three four. So it's

0:50:05.880 --> 0:50:08.040
<v Speaker 1>I think it's more of a they're gonna need a

0:50:08.040 --> 0:50:10.080
<v Speaker 1>couple of years before they draft the right players for

0:50:10.080 --> 0:50:12.520
<v Speaker 1>their sis. This is one of the questions I really

0:50:12.520 --> 0:50:15.920
<v Speaker 1>liked that we got this one Chris Blystone at Chris Blystone.

0:50:16.239 --> 0:50:18.480
<v Speaker 1>If your team could have J. J. Watt or two

0:50:18.520 --> 0:50:23.319
<v Speaker 1>first round picks in sixteen, and again in what are

0:50:23.360 --> 0:50:27.399
<v Speaker 1>you taking, lindsay you the first round picks, So you're

0:50:27.400 --> 0:50:30.239
<v Speaker 1>talking four number one, number one? Do we know where

0:50:30.280 --> 0:50:32.439
<v Speaker 1>there's number one? Are going to be good point West?

0:50:32.440 --> 0:50:34.360
<v Speaker 1>And I know clearly you read my mail back like

0:50:34.400 --> 0:50:36.600
<v Speaker 1>I do read all of your work. Um, I said

0:50:36.640 --> 0:50:38.479
<v Speaker 1>the same thing I need to know more of because

0:50:38.480 --> 0:50:40.640
<v Speaker 1>if they're four top ten picks and let's say a

0:50:40.719 --> 0:50:43.600
<v Speaker 1>number one, I'm still thinking about it. But at the end,

0:50:43.680 --> 0:50:47.320
<v Speaker 1>unless there's an Andrew Luck, uh you know type guy there,

0:50:47.800 --> 0:50:50.480
<v Speaker 1>I am sticking with who the player that could end

0:50:50.560 --> 0:50:53.200
<v Speaker 1>up being the greatest defensive lineman in the history of

0:50:53.239 --> 0:50:56.239
<v Speaker 1>the game. So I say no with qualification could end

0:50:56.280 --> 0:50:59.279
<v Speaker 1>up being the greatest defensive player in this Potentially, it's

0:50:59.320 --> 0:51:02.719
<v Speaker 1>that the ceilings that high. I tend to agree with you.

0:51:02.880 --> 0:51:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Unless I'm guaranteed that there's picture in the top ten,

0:51:05.960 --> 0:51:08.120
<v Speaker 1>I think I'd stick with the guy who's a game changer.

0:51:08.280 --> 0:51:10.839
<v Speaker 1>I think it also depends what your team is. Are

0:51:10.960 --> 0:51:13.719
<v Speaker 1>you You've got multiple holes all over the place, and

0:51:13.719 --> 0:51:16.120
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna just take J. J. Watt. I'm gonna look

0:51:16.160 --> 0:51:18.280
<v Speaker 1>at this from a losing team that needs to fill

0:51:18.760 --> 0:51:21.480
<v Speaker 1>quarterback and other things. I'll go to the picks so

0:51:21.640 --> 0:51:25.440
<v Speaker 1>you can get Brandon Wheed and Johnny Manziel. Well, hopefully

0:51:25.480 --> 0:51:30.319
<v Speaker 1>I will do a better job than that. Yeah, all right,

0:51:30.440 --> 0:51:33.360
<v Speaker 1>next one and I find out it's four number thirty

0:51:33.360 --> 0:51:36.120
<v Speaker 1>two picks and I made a terrible choice. H another

0:51:36.120 --> 0:51:38.000
<v Speaker 1>call back to our one Hit Wonder discussion. This is

0:51:38.040 --> 0:51:44.760
<v Speaker 1>from a Lani at a perk oh Okay, how bizarre

0:51:44.840 --> 0:51:49.600
<v Speaker 1>OMC totally overlooked during both My mail Bag and Sully

0:51:49.800 --> 0:51:54.719
<v Speaker 1>seriously under sold Deep Loose Something Radio. So Sully behind

0:51:54.760 --> 0:51:58.920
<v Speaker 1>the glass there, Lindsay, that's the man with a mustache. Uh.

0:51:58.960 --> 0:52:03.200
<v Speaker 1>On his Pandora he puts deep Blue something or Breakfast

0:52:03.239 --> 0:52:05.920
<v Speaker 1>the Tiffany as you remember that song? Uh, that is

0:52:05.960 --> 0:52:09.440
<v Speaker 1>this song, he tells the computer or or the hard

0:52:09.520 --> 0:52:12.319
<v Speaker 1>drive of the Pandora, however it works, use that to

0:52:12.400 --> 0:52:16.040
<v Speaker 1>find all other different songs Breakfast at Tiffany. Yeah, well,

0:52:16.080 --> 0:52:19.040
<v Speaker 1>pretty much every song we've listed, it's on that playlist,

0:52:19.600 --> 0:52:23.080
<v Speaker 1>like the Eagle Eye, Cherry Take Me Higher, like all those,

0:52:23.120 --> 0:52:26.520
<v Speaker 1>like all the ones, um the Sunshine song you pick,

0:52:26.640 --> 0:52:28.799
<v Speaker 1>Deal My Sunshine, Tell My Sunshine. It's all on there.

0:52:29.360 --> 0:52:31.680
<v Speaker 1>I almost went to how bizarre, but I can't think

0:52:31.880 --> 0:52:33.880
<v Speaker 1>above some of the others. Well, can we hear some

0:52:33.920 --> 0:52:37.239
<v Speaker 1>of how bizarre? Because if my memory, uh, it is

0:52:37.280 --> 0:52:39.840
<v Speaker 1>not you know, wronging me. This was one of the

0:52:39.880 --> 0:52:42.960
<v Speaker 1>worst songs ever. And it's, like Lindsay said, annoying, this

0:52:43.040 --> 0:52:47.759
<v Speaker 1>was this was awful. This is so bad. This song

0:52:48.200 --> 0:52:52.080
<v Speaker 1>doesn't bother me. Alright, wait a second. I like it

0:52:53.920 --> 0:52:56.760
<v Speaker 1>had its moments, but it is genuinely playing on the radio.

0:52:56.840 --> 0:53:01.439
<v Speaker 1>Or are you great questionings? No, I'm out, I'm out,

0:53:02.320 --> 0:53:06.960
<v Speaker 1>You're out already you probably play I mean I've heard it.

0:53:07.000 --> 0:53:10.000
<v Speaker 1>I've it's had its moment. I'm I'm over it. Did

0:53:10.040 --> 0:53:11.799
<v Speaker 1>you have to wait like a minute before you even

0:53:11.800 --> 0:53:14.840
<v Speaker 1>get to the first first good drop? That time for that?

0:53:15.520 --> 0:53:19.160
<v Speaker 1>Earn it? All right? We'll do one more and then

0:53:19.160 --> 0:53:23.840
<v Speaker 1>we'll get Connor on the phone. Is all right? Not

0:53:23.920 --> 0:53:30.560
<v Speaker 1>good enough? Not good enough? Oh there's some judgment. I'm

0:53:30.600 --> 0:53:34.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna start calling out names this Eric robertson that bow tie.

0:53:35.520 --> 0:53:37.919
<v Speaker 1>What one NFL player do you take with you into

0:53:37.960 --> 0:53:41.280
<v Speaker 1>the world of mad Max? I answered this in the mailback.

0:53:43.040 --> 0:53:46.640
<v Speaker 1>You're not familiar with outrageous Apoca post apocalyptic movie where

0:53:46.680 --> 0:53:48.680
<v Speaker 1>you go on mark you and I can answer this one. Yeah,

0:53:48.760 --> 0:53:51.680
<v Speaker 1>like what it's like? I was twenty mile journey in

0:53:51.680 --> 0:53:54.320
<v Speaker 1>one direction and then back. It's just yeah, an all out,

0:53:54.680 --> 0:53:58.960
<v Speaker 1>uh total nealistic everyone out for their own best interest

0:53:59.040 --> 0:54:01.880
<v Speaker 1>to get just goods or oil. You need somebody on

0:54:01.920 --> 0:54:04.960
<v Speaker 1>your side. It's a deathmatch. Basically, I'm picking J. J. Watt.

0:54:05.080 --> 0:54:10.480
<v Speaker 1>How is this not J J. Watt? Well, I like J. J. Watt. Um,

0:54:10.520 --> 0:54:12.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm having a tough time thinking of someone you need.

0:54:12.880 --> 0:54:15.799
<v Speaker 1>You need number one and amazing someone who can drive well,

0:54:16.520 --> 0:54:20.600
<v Speaker 1>the best driver in the entire NFL because the whole

0:54:20.640 --> 0:54:23.279
<v Speaker 1>movie it's all vehicle based on warfield and I'm not

0:54:23.320 --> 0:54:26.920
<v Speaker 1>sure J J. Watt is that guy. Damn Pastorini. No,

0:54:27.040 --> 0:54:31.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going Dan Pastorini. I had to think more about.

0:54:32.239 --> 0:54:35.279
<v Speaker 1>The only player I've even seen drive is Peyton where

0:54:35.280 --> 0:54:38.440
<v Speaker 1>he's like orange barrel, orange barrel rewroute. I ain't taking him. No,

0:54:38.560 --> 0:54:40.960
<v Speaker 1>I would not be taking Peyton Manning in a mad Maxinarian.

0:54:41.640 --> 0:54:43.759
<v Speaker 1>His head would literally fall off when there you have

0:54:43.840 --> 0:54:47.000
<v Speaker 1>to go. J J. Watt is the best answer for

0:54:47.120 --> 0:54:51.000
<v Speaker 1>lack of any better pick. But I don't know, guys,

0:54:51.160 --> 0:54:53.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, I'm getta tied of the hold. J J. Watt, Day,

0:54:54.200 --> 0:54:56.360
<v Speaker 1>J J w There's been a little bit of overexposure

0:54:56.360 --> 0:54:57.920
<v Speaker 1>of this office a little bit, a little bit. Well,

0:54:57.960 --> 0:55:00.480
<v Speaker 1>hard Knocks is coming, so Henry made the same point recently.

0:55:00.480 --> 0:55:03.080
<v Speaker 1>But still, I mean, he's great. What you can't take that? Well, no,

0:55:03.200 --> 0:55:05.080
<v Speaker 1>for sure, but this is the all field for center

0:55:05.239 --> 0:55:07.640
<v Speaker 1>is almost becoming a bit of a caricature now almost

0:55:07.719 --> 0:55:09.839
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. It's like, come on, j J. Slow

0:55:09.880 --> 0:55:13.920
<v Speaker 1>it down a little, you know, stop tackling, stop staging tackling. Guys.

0:55:14.680 --> 0:55:20.239
<v Speaker 1>That that was a little much finally, and that's really

0:55:20.280 --> 0:55:22.799
<v Speaker 1>have to send that sound to J. J. Watt from US.

0:55:23.520 --> 0:55:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Finally from Stephen at Durnhoe, will you please play the

0:55:27.520 --> 0:55:30.600
<v Speaker 1>San Diego Superchargers song and brighten up my week? I

0:55:30.640 --> 0:55:33.239
<v Speaker 1>think we can do that right today? I was. I

0:55:33.280 --> 0:55:34.920
<v Speaker 1>always thought I saw this. Maybe you should do the

0:55:34.920 --> 0:55:39.080
<v Speaker 1>sad version because Antonio Gates got suspended, but maybe it's

0:55:39.120 --> 0:55:44.600
<v Speaker 1>better to do the happy because you know what your

0:55:44.640 --> 0:55:47.680
<v Speaker 1>final year in San Diego. So they were a monumental mistake.

0:55:47.800 --> 0:55:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Is the team of a t o? Steven? Yes, Stephen? No?

0:55:51.160 --> 0:55:53.279
<v Speaker 1>Were they the team? And remember him? Yes? Say that's

0:55:53.280 --> 0:55:57.000
<v Speaker 1>how bad they were? Well Stephen from Glasgow, Scotland. So

0:55:57.400 --> 0:56:00.359
<v Speaker 1>let's let's cheer him up if a TD and come

0:56:00.440 --> 0:56:03.200
<v Speaker 1>up with the song on that board? Hold on, got it?

0:56:03.400 --> 0:56:14.879
<v Speaker 1>Nice super charge of sundy Go super Charger. It's called

0:56:14.880 --> 0:56:22.279
<v Speaker 1>a falsetto. That was for Stephen. Our host has such

0:56:22.280 --> 0:56:25.759
<v Speaker 1>a myriad of mental issues that it plays out in

0:56:25.760 --> 0:56:27.920
<v Speaker 1>our favor. I thought you were gonna say skills, but okay,

0:56:27.920 --> 0:56:29.640
<v Speaker 1>I did not think mental issues was coming out of

0:56:29.680 --> 0:56:31.520
<v Speaker 1>his mouth. Next time. That was not fair, Mark, that's

0:56:31.520 --> 0:56:33.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna cost you the m v P. Right, Oh yeah,

0:56:34.000 --> 0:56:36.839
<v Speaker 1>I was in the running for Yeah. Um, all right,

0:56:37.040 --> 0:56:39.799
<v Speaker 1>there you go, Stephen. Uh, and you know Antonio Gates

0:56:39.840 --> 0:56:41.360
<v Speaker 1>is coming back. Don't worry. All right, that's it for

0:56:41.360 --> 0:56:43.799
<v Speaker 1>the mailbag before we go. Here we go. It's time

0:56:43.840 --> 0:56:46.920
<v Speaker 1>to get him on the phone, you know. Uh, this

0:56:47.000 --> 0:56:49.720
<v Speaker 1>is the third time we've done this segment now, and

0:56:49.719 --> 0:56:53.080
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's an important segment because Connor or our

0:56:53.200 --> 0:56:57.439
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey correspondent Lindsay, he's a great writer, former beat

0:56:57.440 --> 0:57:00.360
<v Speaker 1>reporter for the Jets and Giants for the Star Ledger. Familiar,

0:57:00.520 --> 0:57:03.359
<v Speaker 1>but at the same time, sometimes he's got to get

0:57:03.360 --> 0:57:06.319
<v Speaker 1>stuff off his chest and if he doesn't, he just explodes.

0:57:06.680 --> 0:57:09.759
<v Speaker 1>He's basically the Incredible Hulk in real life. Uh TD,

0:57:09.840 --> 0:57:13.719
<v Speaker 1>you'll get that reference. Um. So that's why we bring

0:57:13.800 --> 0:57:15.879
<v Speaker 1>him on the line for and and it's a game

0:57:16.040 --> 0:57:26.160
<v Speaker 1>or a segment we like to call are you kidding me? Connor?

0:57:26.160 --> 0:57:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Are you there? See on her off day hand buried

0:57:31.600 --> 0:57:36.720
<v Speaker 1>in her face? This is why she's here. Uh, welcome

0:57:36.800 --> 0:57:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Connor back for the third second. Now with each each

0:57:39.400 --> 0:57:42.360
<v Speaker 1>time after the second time, we put it out in Twitter, Hey,

0:57:42.360 --> 0:57:45.600
<v Speaker 1>should we keep doing this? Overwhelmingly? In fact, I didn't

0:57:45.600 --> 0:57:47.200
<v Speaker 1>get a single person on my feet. I don't know

0:57:47.200 --> 0:57:49.560
<v Speaker 1>about you guys that said get rid of that Connor Or.

0:57:49.840 --> 0:57:51.960
<v Speaker 1>I did get one person that said the guitar squilling

0:57:52.000 --> 0:57:55.600
<v Speaker 1>was better than connor Or, but nobody said they didn't

0:57:55.680 --> 0:58:02.600
<v Speaker 1>like Connor Or. So Connor you're back. Yeah, So Connor

0:58:02.600 --> 0:58:04.880
<v Speaker 1>you're back though, and this is where we just picked

0:58:04.880 --> 0:58:07.560
<v Speaker 1>you up for the full season. So let's let's get

0:58:07.560 --> 0:58:10.000
<v Speaker 1>going on a good note. Well, well, you know what's

0:58:10.040 --> 0:58:13.960
<v Speaker 1>bothering you this week? I would have to say, um,

0:58:14.000 --> 0:58:16.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, based on just some of the research that

0:58:16.360 --> 0:58:19.400
<v Speaker 1>I've done recently on Twitter, I think that we can

0:58:19.480 --> 0:58:24.680
<v Speaker 1>probably can our excitement and amazement over athletes being good

0:58:24.720 --> 0:58:28.560
<v Speaker 1>at other sports besides the one that they're currently professional with,

0:58:28.760 --> 0:58:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Like you know, like Odell Beckham throwing a softball for

0:58:31.600 --> 0:58:33.880
<v Speaker 1>a strike was just the most amazing thing. I think

0:58:33.920 --> 0:58:35.400
<v Speaker 1>that half of the people in the world has ever

0:58:35.400 --> 0:58:45.640
<v Speaker 1>seen their lives and you know, you know kind of Connor,

0:58:45.800 --> 0:58:47.720
<v Speaker 1>this is I need you to understand the beats of

0:58:47.760 --> 0:58:49.640
<v Speaker 1>your segment, you know, try to parse it out a

0:58:49.680 --> 0:58:51.280
<v Speaker 1>little bit so we can drop in one of these

0:58:51.320 --> 0:58:56.920
<v Speaker 1>bad boys. Alright, go on, so uh to your saying

0:58:56.920 --> 0:58:59.840
<v Speaker 1>that we shouldn't be getting so excited about Odell Beckham

0:58:59.920 --> 0:59:03.720
<v Speaker 1>or any of these athletes on skates j J just

0:59:03.800 --> 0:59:06.640
<v Speaker 1>that they're athletic, because of course they're athletic, right, Well,

0:59:06.640 --> 0:59:09.160
<v Speaker 1>it's just like the best athlete at your high school

0:59:09.200 --> 0:59:11.720
<v Speaker 1>was the only good at one sport, you know, like

0:59:11.960 --> 0:59:23.080
<v Speaker 1>or like I can drive a car, Jacks, don't tell

0:59:23.160 --> 0:59:26.760
<v Speaker 1>yourself short, Are you kidding me? Keep confident? Um? Yeah,

0:59:26.840 --> 0:59:28.360
<v Speaker 1>but I mean, like I can drive a car in

0:59:28.440 --> 0:59:32.960
<v Speaker 1>a truck. Isn't that amazing? Like car and a truck.

0:59:33.520 --> 0:59:37.040
<v Speaker 1>This guy can drive multiple vehicles. But you can put

0:59:37.040 --> 0:59:41.360
<v Speaker 1>that on Instagram. Nobody cares, you know. I've tried. Nobody cares,

0:59:41.480 --> 0:59:43.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, So maybe it's just me. I don't know,

0:59:43.880 --> 0:59:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's just me. It's legitimate, it's a valid concern.

0:59:47.160 --> 0:59:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Your Well, this speaks to the overexposure that I was

0:59:50.120 --> 0:59:54.760
<v Speaker 1>just referencing. Gets to a point where maybe one one

0:59:54.840 --> 0:59:58.040
<v Speaker 1>thing like this paroph season is good and fun, isn't

0:59:58.080 --> 1:00:00.280
<v Speaker 1>it just because it's June and July and there's nothing

1:00:00.280 --> 1:00:02.320
<v Speaker 1>else to talk about? So you have to stretch for

1:00:02.680 --> 1:00:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Odell Beckham throwing a strike at a softball. So connor

1:00:05.640 --> 1:00:08.200
<v Speaker 1>you saying that these athletes it's a little they're being

1:00:08.240 --> 1:00:12.040
<v Speaker 1>a little braggarts. It's like enough, no more, just stick

1:00:12.080 --> 1:00:14.000
<v Speaker 1>to your sport. We know you're gonna anything everything else.

1:00:14.040 --> 1:00:16.000
<v Speaker 1>We don't need to hear about it. Well, their job

1:00:16.080 --> 1:00:19.040
<v Speaker 1>is to professionally be in shape, and I think that

1:00:19.120 --> 1:00:22.360
<v Speaker 1>comes with certain skill sets, like Odell Beckham has to

1:00:22.400 --> 1:00:25.800
<v Speaker 1>throw a million football, so like presumably you'd be able

1:00:25.840 --> 1:00:28.360
<v Speaker 1>to throw a softball straight right like that? There seems

1:00:28.360 --> 1:00:32.520
<v Speaker 1>to be some cross over there, no fatties allowed, We're

1:00:32.520 --> 1:00:36.120
<v Speaker 1>all in shape or pros Connor or how do you

1:00:36.120 --> 1:00:41.200
<v Speaker 1>feel about snapchat? What snapcham? I mean, if it's used

1:00:41.200 --> 1:00:43.360
<v Speaker 1>in the right way, I love it. You know what

1:00:43.920 --> 1:00:47.360
<v Speaker 1>is the right way us? The right way is to like,

1:00:47.840 --> 1:00:50.760
<v Speaker 1>like to wish your friend a happy birthday, but like

1:00:50.840 --> 1:00:53.360
<v Speaker 1>in a visual way, like to just take a picture

1:00:53.400 --> 1:00:55.800
<v Speaker 1>of your face and then draw a hat on top

1:00:55.840 --> 1:00:58.280
<v Speaker 1>of it and then like you know, put some music on.

1:00:58.320 --> 1:01:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Itll be a ready to be wacky your friends. After all,

1:01:03.160 --> 1:01:06.680
<v Speaker 1>What's what does snapchat offer that Facebook or text messaging

1:01:06.720 --> 1:01:10.880
<v Speaker 1>does not? The ability to go away, It deletes itself

1:01:10.920 --> 1:01:13.240
<v Speaker 1>after a certain period of time. Really, it's ability to

1:01:13.280 --> 1:01:16.720
<v Speaker 1>be shady, you know, yes, how is that no consequence?

1:01:17.040 --> 1:01:21.400
<v Speaker 1>You're potentially. I have no idea what it is. I'm

1:01:21.400 --> 1:01:24.320
<v Speaker 1>just I'm just asking what it what You're not going

1:01:24.360 --> 1:01:30.960
<v Speaker 1>to be satisfied with anyone, so so inflammation, Uh, Connor,

1:01:31.480 --> 1:01:34.960
<v Speaker 1>enough with the athletes showing off and the snapchat use

1:01:35.000 --> 1:01:36.919
<v Speaker 1>it right your creeps right? Is that what you're saying?

1:01:37.520 --> 1:01:39.360
<v Speaker 1>I think so? Actually, I feel like just do it.

1:01:39.520 --> 1:01:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Just do it in your own sports and your and

1:01:42.800 --> 1:01:46.720
<v Speaker 1>your final your final comment of course, or are you

1:01:46.800 --> 1:01:52.920
<v Speaker 1>kidding me that? I have a nice weekend, Connor? Or

1:01:53.600 --> 1:01:57.120
<v Speaker 1>I was waiting for the fourth of July. Everybody happy,

1:01:57.440 --> 1:02:01.880
<v Speaker 1>nice meeting. Um I I have some constructive criticism for

1:02:01.880 --> 1:02:04.640
<v Speaker 1>that segment ahead, Okay, I feel like it needs to

1:02:04.680 --> 1:02:08.880
<v Speaker 1>start within or you kidding me this or like every

1:02:08.880 --> 1:02:12.360
<v Speaker 1>single one like you need that thrown throughout Italy. Drive

1:02:12.600 --> 1:02:14.960
<v Speaker 1>the segment home, like this is why it's called or

1:02:15.000 --> 1:02:18.080
<v Speaker 1>you kidding me? You're saying less guitar anthems, or he

1:02:18.120 --> 1:02:21.120
<v Speaker 1>could emphasize his point with or you kidding yeah, that's

1:02:21.160 --> 1:02:24.400
<v Speaker 1>stuff that will more frequently and then after he says,

1:02:27.560 --> 1:02:29.840
<v Speaker 1>after the or you kidding me, then you do the guitar.

1:02:30.000 --> 1:02:32.080
<v Speaker 1>There you go? All right, we're work shopping it live

1:02:32.120 --> 1:02:33.800
<v Speaker 1>on the podcast, I feel like he really needs to

1:02:33.800 --> 1:02:36.240
<v Speaker 1>turn himself into more of a caricature. I guess from

1:02:36.280 --> 1:02:38.800
<v Speaker 1>his angle, it was tough to get probably a word out.

1:02:38.920 --> 1:02:42.520
<v Speaker 1>There's a outrageous guitar playing. That's a recurring you know,

1:02:42.640 --> 1:02:44.440
<v Speaker 1>that's part of the bit. And for those that don't know,

1:02:44.720 --> 1:02:46.720
<v Speaker 1>I have what my sound job board, but that really

1:02:46.760 --> 1:02:48.840
<v Speaker 1>is all Dan. He actually has a guitar in this hand.

1:02:49.000 --> 1:02:51.560
<v Speaker 1>He's just that's well. Last week we said it was

1:02:51.640 --> 1:02:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Connor playing the guitar, but don't reveal that TV. He

1:02:54.480 --> 1:02:57.560
<v Speaker 1>also refuses to put any enthusiasm whatsoever into the or

1:02:57.600 --> 1:03:00.560
<v Speaker 1>you kidding that's my favorite part. That's you're like And

1:03:00.600 --> 1:03:03.760
<v Speaker 1>finally he's like, are you kidding me? All right, that's it.

1:03:04.000 --> 1:03:06.600
<v Speaker 1>That's it for the show, and uh, lindsay, thank you

1:03:06.640 --> 1:03:10.320
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us once again. It was really delightful.

1:03:10.360 --> 1:03:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for having me. Yeah, and good luck to you

1:03:12.280 --> 1:03:15.000
<v Speaker 1>in the top ten reveal. Uh, we will not tell

1:03:15.000 --> 1:03:18.959
<v Speaker 1>you what they are. You will find out. We're gonna

1:03:19.000 --> 1:03:21.280
<v Speaker 1>talk to the bosses after this, all right, So that's it.

1:03:21.760 --> 1:03:23.480
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna win m v P. But you have to

1:03:23.480 --> 1:03:27.640
<v Speaker 1>go forget about it again. So and so with that

1:03:27.720 --> 1:03:29.960
<v Speaker 1>being said, he gives away an MVP every show. I

1:03:30.000 --> 1:03:32.960
<v Speaker 1>would say Lindsay has won it before she knows. You know.

1:03:32.960 --> 1:03:36.440
<v Speaker 1>It's the feeling we've all experienced, except Mark, but so

1:03:36.600 --> 1:03:40.360
<v Speaker 1>happy West is an est West happy today he has

1:03:40.400 --> 1:03:42.760
<v Speaker 1>been a good mood. A lot of you know, debating

1:03:42.800 --> 1:03:44.920
<v Speaker 1>if it's about some new women in his life. I know,

1:03:45.000 --> 1:03:47.320
<v Speaker 1>I think it is. What he revealed before the show

1:03:47.320 --> 1:03:49.840
<v Speaker 1>he started watching a Game of Thrones. He's getting into it.

1:03:49.880 --> 1:03:52.320
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't want to admit he's getting into it. So no,

1:03:52.400 --> 1:03:55.320
<v Speaker 1>that's not really why. I'm not really all in anyway.

1:03:55.360 --> 1:03:57.800
<v Speaker 1>When the smoke Monster from Lost showed up, that really

1:03:58.360 --> 1:04:00.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. And then the snow zombies are whatever

1:04:00.280 --> 1:04:02.800
<v Speaker 1>they are, and I don't really get into that. So

1:04:02.880 --> 1:04:06.000
<v Speaker 1>far behind your m v P has already betrayed you.

1:04:06.160 --> 1:04:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Nice job, and he really wasn't for those people from

1:04:10.440 --> 1:04:13.200
<v Speaker 1>three years ago, it's about time they killed off. I

1:04:13.240 --> 1:04:17.280
<v Speaker 1>added nothing to the show whatsoever. It was an absolute creeks. Alright,

1:04:18.040 --> 1:04:20.880
<v Speaker 1>if we have to, you know, leap that out, we have. Yeah, alright,

1:04:20.960 --> 1:04:23.000
<v Speaker 1>yeah we go, let's get out of here. This is

1:04:23.280 --> 1:04:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Dan Hansis signing off for the Quiet Storm The Mailman Lenz.

1:04:29.560 --> 1:04:37.720
<v Speaker 1>Did we come up with this yet. Benzy Rhodes and

1:04:37.840 --> 1:04:41.439
<v Speaker 1>Daddy Rich behind the glass that Daddy ranch signing off

1:04:41.960 --> 1:04:54.160
<v Speaker 1>until next week. Click that for Emmy reel. What What