1 00:00:01,120 --> 00:00:04,760 Speaker 1: Your tunes about Drive on Home of the Black and 2 00:00:04,840 --> 00:00:33,360 Speaker 1: Goal Steelers Nation Radio. Welcome back to the Drive. I'm 3 00:00:33,440 --> 00:00:37,440 Speaker 1: Dale Ali here with Matt Williamson and Matt Um. There's 4 00:00:37,440 --> 00:00:41,680 Speaker 1: the thing here on CBS Sports about the I guess 5 00:00:41,680 --> 00:00:45,360 Speaker 1: it's the all a f C North team, and I 6 00:00:45,400 --> 00:00:47,479 Speaker 1: wanted to us to pick our all a f C 7 00:00:47,640 --> 00:00:49,640 Speaker 1: North team. I'm fine with that. Let's do it and 8 00:00:49,680 --> 00:00:52,840 Speaker 1: then look at what they picked here. I gotta agree 9 00:00:52,840 --> 00:00:56,720 Speaker 1: with everything with every one of their picks here. Um, yeah, 10 00:00:56,840 --> 00:01:00,320 Speaker 1: that's interesting. Um, you're just gonna start a quarterback? Sure, 11 00:01:01,240 --> 00:01:04,960 Speaker 1: I think you gotta take Lamar. I believe so. Yeah, yeah, 12 00:01:05,120 --> 00:01:07,560 Speaker 1: I mean it's a conversation, and I really feel like 13 00:01:07,600 --> 00:01:11,600 Speaker 1: those waters are changing. I have a lot of respect 14 00:01:11,640 --> 00:01:14,600 Speaker 1: for what Burrow might become. I think Baker kind of 15 00:01:14,680 --> 00:01:16,440 Speaker 1: is what he is at this point, but you know, 16 00:01:16,520 --> 00:01:20,399 Speaker 1: loaded with you know, people around him. Um, not that 17 00:01:20,680 --> 00:01:23,080 Speaker 1: you know, downplay what he's capable of. He's a good player. 18 00:01:23,640 --> 00:01:28,319 Speaker 1: Um and Ben's at the end, but I I think 19 00:01:28,319 --> 00:01:31,440 Speaker 1: Ben's could be better this year than last. If you 20 00:01:31,520 --> 00:01:35,960 Speaker 1: gave me, okay a quarterback just for this year and said, okay, 21 00:01:36,000 --> 00:01:38,679 Speaker 1: which one do you want to start your team? With 22 00:01:39,200 --> 00:01:42,319 Speaker 1: like if Roethlisberger on Cleveland's roster. Yeah, I think we 23 00:01:42,319 --> 00:01:44,560 Speaker 1: talked about that last week. I would fear the Browns 24 00:01:44,760 --> 00:01:49,120 Speaker 1: might be like a four team win team, right, running 25 00:01:49,160 --> 00:01:52,000 Speaker 1: game exactly and fair enough weapons. You know, the bench 26 00:01:52,040 --> 00:01:55,760 Speaker 1: wouldn't be quite as good, But I think that that 27 00:01:55,800 --> 00:01:57,600 Speaker 1: would be that I would think the Browns would be 28 00:01:57,640 --> 00:02:00,400 Speaker 1: a better team. I mean, I'm they wouldn't trade Ben Baker, 29 00:02:00,440 --> 00:02:02,280 Speaker 1: of course, you know. I mean we know all those things. 30 00:02:02,760 --> 00:02:05,080 Speaker 1: And frankly, if I'm building a team from here forward, 31 00:02:05,120 --> 00:02:06,800 Speaker 1: I might grab Burrow out of the four of him, 32 00:02:06,920 --> 00:02:09,600 Speaker 1: you know, and I think he's a really good prospect. 33 00:02:10,240 --> 00:02:12,760 Speaker 1: But I think Lamar has to be the one that 34 00:02:13,000 --> 00:02:17,400 Speaker 1: is the best player right now one year ago, right, 35 00:02:17,440 --> 00:02:19,440 Speaker 1: I mean, I know he's a lot different, and we're 36 00:02:19,440 --> 00:02:22,040 Speaker 1: not building our team around Lamar. We're just picking a 37 00:02:22,120 --> 00:02:25,880 Speaker 1: quarterback here. I think it's got to be him running back. 38 00:02:26,840 --> 00:02:31,520 Speaker 1: They only picked one. They took Chubb. I think I 39 00:02:31,520 --> 00:02:34,320 Speaker 1: can't argue with that. Boy. It's a good group. J K. 40 00:02:34,520 --> 00:02:38,240 Speaker 1: Dobbins is like fourth, pretty darn good. Yeah, I mean 41 00:02:38,240 --> 00:02:41,720 Speaker 1: I think Harris could unseat Dub Trubb. Yeah, you know, 42 00:02:41,760 --> 00:02:43,680 Speaker 1: I think that could, you know, because he's gonna have more. 43 00:02:43,840 --> 00:02:47,400 Speaker 1: There's just more there as a receiver. Chubb's an elite 44 00:02:47,480 --> 00:02:50,120 Speaker 1: ball carrier and he's a great player. They just gave 45 00:02:50,200 --> 00:02:52,000 Speaker 1: him money and have many qualms with it, even though 46 00:02:52,040 --> 00:02:54,440 Speaker 1: he's a running back. I mean, he still a hunt 47 00:02:54,600 --> 00:02:56,640 Speaker 1: who isn't bad. I mean, if he's your fifth guy 48 00:02:56,800 --> 00:03:00,280 Speaker 1: or Edmund, you know Edwards is your six guy. Pretty 49 00:03:00,320 --> 00:03:03,160 Speaker 1: loaded group. And I still think mixing could be in 50 00:03:03,200 --> 00:03:04,960 Speaker 1: the conversation is the best one to hear from you. 51 00:03:05,080 --> 00:03:07,200 Speaker 1: I was reading something about the Bengals today and they 52 00:03:07,720 --> 00:03:09,880 Speaker 1: I think Zach Taylor said, they don't know if they 53 00:03:09,919 --> 00:03:12,400 Speaker 1: have a guard any They still haven't settled on the 54 00:03:12,600 --> 00:03:15,680 Speaker 1: start two starting guards yet. That's a bit of an issue. 55 00:03:15,960 --> 00:03:18,920 Speaker 1: It's a bit of an issue, especially in this division, 56 00:03:19,040 --> 00:03:21,760 Speaker 1: in this division with really good interior. D you Lineman, 57 00:03:21,840 --> 00:03:26,120 Speaker 1: and yeah, it's problematic. The wide receivers is that's a 58 00:03:26,120 --> 00:03:30,520 Speaker 1: tough one. It's a tough one. Um, they're taking two 59 00:03:30,639 --> 00:03:37,520 Speaker 1: or three. It took three. I'm taking Odell okay, I'm 60 00:03:37,560 --> 00:03:45,120 Speaker 1: taking Deonte okay, m hm. Higgins versus Claypool for the 61 00:03:45,160 --> 00:03:51,400 Speaker 1: third one. From me, I think it's Claypool, Johnson and Higgins. 62 00:03:52,280 --> 00:03:54,360 Speaker 1: I can't put Odell Beckham on a team when he 63 00:03:54,400 --> 00:03:57,440 Speaker 1: plays six games a year, I just can't. I mean, 64 00:03:57,480 --> 00:04:00,160 Speaker 1: he's a lot different than the others. He's a lay 65 00:04:00,200 --> 00:04:02,520 Speaker 1: a full season since two thousand and fourteen, I know, 66 00:04:02,880 --> 00:04:05,040 Speaker 1: and he hasn't been great since. I mean he was 67 00:04:05,600 --> 00:04:08,680 Speaker 1: not nothing good with the brown not being great with 68 00:04:08,680 --> 00:04:10,480 Speaker 1: the Browns, not what he wasn't with New York. His 69 00:04:10,480 --> 00:04:12,560 Speaker 1: first year of the Browns was flat out bad. Last 70 00:04:12,640 --> 00:04:14,600 Speaker 1: year I thought he played well but got hurt and 71 00:04:14,680 --> 00:04:18,479 Speaker 1: didn't see much of him. I mean, I'd much rather 72 00:04:18,560 --> 00:04:27,200 Speaker 1: have Higgins, Chase, Claypool, Deonte, maybe even Bateman over Odell 73 00:04:27,320 --> 00:04:29,320 Speaker 1: to build a team around the term. Yeah, I just 74 00:04:29,320 --> 00:04:31,919 Speaker 1: don't know Beham is. I just you know, if he 75 00:04:31,920 --> 00:04:35,400 Speaker 1: had played all sixteen games last year, Okay, I get it, 76 00:04:36,080 --> 00:04:37,800 Speaker 1: even at the level that he played that last year 77 00:04:37,800 --> 00:04:40,560 Speaker 1: because he was he was fine, like yeah, but he 78 00:04:40,680 --> 00:04:44,520 Speaker 1: just can't play sixteen games anymore, No, I mean that's undeniable. 79 00:04:44,640 --> 00:04:48,400 Speaker 1: Does does Landry cross your mind at all? He's reliable 80 00:04:48,440 --> 00:04:51,880 Speaker 1: and he's so boring. Yeah, but he's a Steeler, would 81 00:04:51,880 --> 00:04:55,279 Speaker 1: love him, you know what I mean, He's just Landry 82 00:04:55,360 --> 00:04:56,920 Speaker 1: or juju. As I was about to ask you who's 83 00:04:56,920 --> 00:04:58,640 Speaker 1: the better. I think I'd rather Juju. I think so. 84 00:04:58,720 --> 00:05:00,960 Speaker 1: I think he's more juice, yeah, a little bit, and 85 00:05:01,080 --> 00:05:03,359 Speaker 1: I think he helps you in different ways too, and 86 00:05:03,480 --> 00:05:07,520 Speaker 1: blocking and those kind of things. Yeah, so Landry bigger body. Yeah, 87 00:05:07,800 --> 00:05:10,080 Speaker 1: on the list, but I mean he's not bad. You 88 00:05:10,120 --> 00:05:12,320 Speaker 1: can't but like Jamar Chase on that list yet, No, 89 00:05:12,520 --> 00:05:15,760 Speaker 1: Tyler Boy wouldn't even talk about how about Boyd verse 90 00:05:15,839 --> 00:05:19,479 Speaker 1: Juju verse Landry. I think I'm still wanting Juju. Yeah, 91 00:05:19,520 --> 00:05:21,960 Speaker 1: I think. I mean if Juju Juju played with that 92 00:05:21,960 --> 00:05:24,920 Speaker 1: Bengals team lest year, he would have finish with ten catches. 93 00:05:24,920 --> 00:05:26,680 Speaker 1: But oh yeah, you know, yeah, it'd be their number 94 00:05:26,680 --> 00:05:31,719 Speaker 1: one guy. Yeah probably, Okay, yeah, you convinced me. I 95 00:05:31,720 --> 00:05:33,320 Speaker 1: mean I didn't want to want to leave Claypool off 96 00:05:33,360 --> 00:05:36,880 Speaker 1: the list. No, No, talent wise, he might not number one. 97 00:05:37,040 --> 00:05:38,520 Speaker 1: I mean a year from now he might be the 98 00:05:38,520 --> 00:05:41,760 Speaker 1: easy one. He and Chase are probably the two guys 99 00:05:41,760 --> 00:05:44,160 Speaker 1: that you look at and go highest upside. Yeah, yeah, 100 00:05:44,400 --> 00:05:46,320 Speaker 1: I think they have the highest ceilings. No, I agree, 101 00:05:47,160 --> 00:05:54,120 Speaker 1: tight end Um gotta be Andrews. Yeah, kind of by default. Yeah, 102 00:05:54,160 --> 00:05:58,000 Speaker 1: it's not the best group, even though the Browns are 103 00:05:58,040 --> 00:06:00,760 Speaker 1: paying their too tight or their tight end room sixty 104 00:06:00,839 --> 00:06:03,039 Speaker 1: million dollars and they don't have the best tight end 105 00:06:03,080 --> 00:06:06,080 Speaker 1: in the in the division. This is optimistic, But could 106 00:06:06,160 --> 00:06:10,039 Speaker 1: friar Mouth be number one a year from now? Potentially 107 00:06:10,800 --> 00:06:13,599 Speaker 1: and Andrews have to have a down year and he doesn't, 108 00:06:13,640 --> 00:06:17,279 Speaker 1: I mean he's he doesn't, doesn't doesn't blocked anybody, and 109 00:06:17,320 --> 00:06:19,680 Speaker 1: I mean he's not that Firemuth is a great blocker, 110 00:06:19,800 --> 00:06:22,800 Speaker 1: but that wouldn't be that brood over hurdle for a 111 00:06:22,800 --> 00:06:26,520 Speaker 1: friar Mouth to get over since he's gotten really nothing. Uh, 112 00:06:26,520 --> 00:06:29,680 Speaker 1: they named a flex option just some skill guy, just 113 00:06:29,960 --> 00:06:32,760 Speaker 1: a skill guy who's not a quarterback. It has to 114 00:06:32,760 --> 00:06:36,240 Speaker 1: be one of the running backs they picked Mixing. Yeah, 115 00:06:36,920 --> 00:06:39,000 Speaker 1: I would too. Yeah, I mean I don't know that 116 00:06:39,040 --> 00:06:42,280 Speaker 1: I would. I wouldn't trade Nausey for Mixing. I mean, 117 00:06:42,279 --> 00:06:44,000 Speaker 1: if the since he offered that, because a couple of 118 00:06:44,080 --> 00:06:47,680 Speaker 1: years difference and he's off the field, and but if 119 00:06:47,680 --> 00:06:50,680 Speaker 1: we're not gonna put you know, Jamaar Chase in the 120 00:06:50,720 --> 00:06:53,560 Speaker 1: conversation until you show me, I think Harris has to 121 00:06:53,560 --> 00:06:59,800 Speaker 1: still fit that mold. I'm fine with that offensive line 122 00:07:00,360 --> 00:07:08,760 Speaker 1: left tackle Stanley with an asterix. Yeah, I mean Joanah 123 00:07:08,800 --> 00:07:14,640 Speaker 1: is not bad. I think worse is not worse. Wills 124 00:07:14,920 --> 00:07:17,000 Speaker 1: is ready to take another big step because he went 125 00:07:17,080 --> 00:07:20,240 Speaker 1: right to left. But I'm gonna go Stanley. Yeah, I 126 00:07:20,240 --> 00:07:22,400 Speaker 1: mean I think his body of work is better than 127 00:07:22,760 --> 00:07:26,160 Speaker 1: everybody else in division. Um, let's just do two guards, 128 00:07:26,200 --> 00:07:32,240 Speaker 1: not right left? Uh the other tackle other tackle? Doan 129 00:07:32,320 --> 00:07:36,760 Speaker 1: Conklin there. Yeah, by default there's three notts a great 130 00:07:36,760 --> 00:07:41,040 Speaker 1: ones or you know, trustworthy ones, including it has to 131 00:07:41,080 --> 00:07:45,640 Speaker 1: be con the guards. Both Cleveland guys are good. I 132 00:07:45,640 --> 00:07:49,840 Speaker 1: would take them over Zeitler, I'd take them over the 133 00:07:49,880 --> 00:07:54,280 Speaker 1: Bengals guys. I would take the two Cleveland guards. Can 134 00:07:54,360 --> 00:07:57,520 Speaker 1: Kevin Dotson get work his way into this conversation? I 135 00:07:57,600 --> 00:07:59,680 Speaker 1: absolutely think so. I think you can expect him to. 136 00:07:59,840 --> 00:08:04,280 Speaker 1: I think he has more upside potential, maybe than than 137 00:08:04,320 --> 00:08:07,440 Speaker 1: any of those guys. Teller's got a lot to work with. Yeah, 138 00:08:07,480 --> 00:08:10,200 Speaker 1: I mean he's a big, nasty dude. He was a 139 00:08:10,240 --> 00:08:12,720 Speaker 1: fourth throng picked too. I say, yeah, he's when people 140 00:08:12,760 --> 00:08:15,160 Speaker 1: say you got the draft guards early. Don't really I 141 00:08:15,200 --> 00:08:16,800 Speaker 1: don't know. Yeah, I mean he was a work in 142 00:08:16,840 --> 00:08:19,640 Speaker 1: progress and what the Bills drafted Bills Bills took him 143 00:08:19,680 --> 00:08:24,120 Speaker 1: and traded him, traded him. Okay, who's your center? I 144 00:08:24,120 --> 00:08:26,239 Speaker 1: think it's got to be Trader. That's who they picked. 145 00:08:26,280 --> 00:08:29,720 Speaker 1: If that's not a great that interior brown is pretty 146 00:08:29,760 --> 00:08:32,880 Speaker 1: darn good. Trader is just okay, it's fine. Yeah, but 147 00:08:33,080 --> 00:08:34,880 Speaker 1: I don't know who else is even in competition for 148 00:08:35,520 --> 00:08:38,640 Speaker 1: Trader might be the weak link in their offensive line. Yeah, 149 00:08:38,760 --> 00:08:41,160 Speaker 1: but he's a top ten center to me. Yeah, I 150 00:08:41,200 --> 00:08:45,520 Speaker 1: mean he's not on Yeah, he's not boy not every division, 151 00:08:45,559 --> 00:08:48,080 Speaker 1: but he'd win it. No, but I think that interior 152 00:08:48,200 --> 00:08:50,439 Speaker 1: line would be your choice. Yeah, I can't argue with that. No, 153 00:08:51,720 --> 00:08:53,520 Speaker 1: I don't know. The Green could unseen him a year 154 00:08:53,520 --> 00:08:55,559 Speaker 1: from No, I don't think you know two years from now. 155 00:08:55,720 --> 00:09:01,560 Speaker 1: Maybe defensive front, who are your two edge guys? Pretty easy? What? Yeah? 156 00:09:02,880 --> 00:09:07,240 Speaker 1: And Myles Garrett pretty good place to start to probably 157 00:09:10,880 --> 00:09:13,079 Speaker 1: real quick. I threw this out there on my podcast 158 00:09:13,160 --> 00:09:16,200 Speaker 1: today because my my co host was asking about, you know, 159 00:09:16,240 --> 00:09:19,240 Speaker 1: what's going on with what? And I said, it kind 160 00:09:19,240 --> 00:09:20,960 Speaker 1: of went down a rabbit hole, and I said, I 161 00:09:21,040 --> 00:09:26,280 Speaker 1: really think even without what, the Steelers edge guys might 162 00:09:26,320 --> 00:09:29,439 Speaker 1: be top ten the league. Without what. Yeah, I mean 163 00:09:29,440 --> 00:09:32,120 Speaker 1: that pairing is pretty darn good. I think if you 164 00:09:32,200 --> 00:09:33,960 Speaker 1: were doing. If you were looking at who to the 165 00:09:34,000 --> 00:09:40,440 Speaker 1: top five edge guys in the division, Yeah, Steelers might 166 00:09:40,480 --> 00:09:45,200 Speaker 1: have three of them. Yeah, yeah, I mean Garrett's definitely one. 167 00:09:46,000 --> 00:09:50,680 Speaker 1: Lawson is gone. I'm not sure hendricks Hendrickson is would 168 00:09:50,679 --> 00:09:53,840 Speaker 1: play a lot of snaps here. They like Hubbard, but 169 00:09:53,920 --> 00:09:56,280 Speaker 1: he'd be let. I wouldn't trade Hubbard for high I 170 00:09:56,280 --> 00:09:58,959 Speaker 1: don't know that that the the Ravens really have anybody 171 00:09:59,000 --> 00:10:01,480 Speaker 1: that I'm not accounting. Clay Campbell's an edge, No, he's 172 00:10:01,480 --> 00:10:05,880 Speaker 1: not an edge Houston. I'd rather Ingram in Houston. I 173 00:10:05,880 --> 00:10:09,160 Speaker 1: mean he would you throw Clowney on that list. He 174 00:10:09,240 --> 00:10:13,920 Speaker 1: has to be considered, but he's not like yeah, he 175 00:10:14,320 --> 00:10:18,400 Speaker 1: always a rookie, right right? Anything they go about ten deep, Yeah, 176 00:10:18,920 --> 00:10:21,520 Speaker 1: but I'm not sure. I mean i'd have Ingram over Clowney, Yeah, 177 00:10:21,880 --> 00:10:25,600 Speaker 1: without a question in my mind. Um yeah, but Watton 178 00:10:25,640 --> 00:10:27,800 Speaker 1: Garrett wouldn't be a bad starting point for a defense 179 00:10:28,960 --> 00:10:36,600 Speaker 1: interior defensive line two or three two cam to it, right, 180 00:10:36,679 --> 00:10:39,520 Speaker 1: that's who they picked. I'm not sure he was even three. 181 00:10:39,559 --> 00:10:41,880 Speaker 1: I would consider Campbell and that. Yeah, I think he's 182 00:10:41,920 --> 00:10:45,120 Speaker 1: closer to those guys, especially at this point in his career. Yes, 183 00:10:45,520 --> 00:10:47,680 Speaker 1: I mean he could line up all over, but he's 184 00:10:47,679 --> 00:10:49,480 Speaker 1: a you know that you're gonna line him up on 185 00:10:49,520 --> 00:10:52,120 Speaker 1: the edge as much now at five and say hey, 186 00:10:52,120 --> 00:10:54,520 Speaker 1: you'll get the quarterback. He's not a quick twitch, you know, 187 00:10:54,640 --> 00:10:57,400 Speaker 1: edge vendor type guy. Now he may be third for 188 00:10:57,480 --> 00:11:00,720 Speaker 1: me though, Yeah, I think so. But the accles aren't great. 189 00:11:00,760 --> 00:11:04,840 Speaker 1: Geno's gone. Browns are kind of looking. There's some guys 190 00:11:04,880 --> 00:11:07,760 Speaker 1: like Matta bout Gay that could be better than this year. 191 00:11:07,840 --> 00:11:10,000 Speaker 1: I haven't really done anything right. The Browns drafted one 192 00:11:10,040 --> 00:11:12,920 Speaker 1: what the second third round last year, the Missouri kid. 193 00:11:13,360 --> 00:11:15,079 Speaker 1: You know, they could be better, but it's got to 194 00:11:15,080 --> 00:11:17,760 Speaker 1: be Camon to it. I mean, Tyson wouldn't be that 195 00:11:17,800 --> 00:11:21,200 Speaker 1: far off. Yeah, he's a quality player. Yeah, I mean 196 00:11:21,280 --> 00:11:27,000 Speaker 1: he would be in the mix. Yeah, is it? The 197 00:11:27,000 --> 00:11:31,480 Speaker 1: Steelers guys? They picked Devin Bush and Anthony Walker from Cleveland. 198 00:11:31,720 --> 00:11:33,920 Speaker 1: Anthony Walker could walk into this room right now and 199 00:11:33,960 --> 00:11:35,439 Speaker 1: I wouldn't know who the hell I say. I don't 200 00:11:35,480 --> 00:11:38,920 Speaker 1: know much about him. I mean, I I know Bengals 201 00:11:38,920 --> 00:11:43,400 Speaker 1: fans are more optimistic about their linebackers than anybody you know, 202 00:11:43,920 --> 00:11:45,600 Speaker 1: But that kid, they can't They're not better in show 203 00:11:45,679 --> 00:11:49,719 Speaker 1: Bert no queen, I know he was bad, but at 204 00:11:49,760 --> 00:11:53,160 Speaker 1: least last year l J. Fork got hurt. Right, they're 205 00:11:53,200 --> 00:11:56,560 Speaker 1: in trouble a little bit. They'd be Queen to step 206 00:11:56,640 --> 00:11:58,520 Speaker 1: up in a bit. He's got to be that instrumental 207 00:11:58,520 --> 00:12:01,440 Speaker 1: guy for them. I'm looking here. They got Malik Harrison, 208 00:12:01,480 --> 00:12:04,959 Speaker 1: Tias Bowler, Bowser and Patrick Queen or there there. Bowser 209 00:12:05,000 --> 00:12:07,400 Speaker 1: is really an edge though, yeah, and and a good one. 210 00:12:07,400 --> 00:12:11,559 Speaker 1: He's I think a potential breakout player. Um, would you 211 00:12:11,559 --> 00:12:16,080 Speaker 1: consider j Okay? I mean Hard didn't rank other rookies 212 00:12:16,080 --> 00:12:18,520 Speaker 1: that were higher lady guys and him right, Like, we 213 00:12:18,520 --> 00:12:22,240 Speaker 1: can't put him on there. I'm looking at the Bengals. Uh, 214 00:12:22,440 --> 00:12:27,440 Speaker 1: it's Logan Wilson, Germaine Pratt. Wilson's a guy there, high 215 00:12:27,480 --> 00:12:32,880 Speaker 1: on but I mean he's not going to Pro Bowl anytime. Yeah, 216 00:12:33,280 --> 00:12:35,280 Speaker 1: they've they've they're all mid round picks that they expect 217 00:12:35,280 --> 00:12:37,520 Speaker 1: to get a little bit better. Yeah, but I'm still 218 00:12:37,520 --> 00:12:40,440 Speaker 1: would put Queen over those guys, but I might be. 219 00:12:40,800 --> 00:12:44,920 Speaker 1: I think it's Shobert Bush and Schobert hyeah Man. Wilson's 220 00:12:44,960 --> 00:12:50,200 Speaker 1: okay for the Browns. Yeah, Um, Tacky Tackys is okay. Yeah, 221 00:12:50,280 --> 00:12:53,439 Speaker 1: Anthony Walker, I'm sorry he's not a difference maker at all. 222 00:12:53,880 --> 00:12:56,840 Speaker 1: I mean, I'd rather Showbert than Walker. Yeah he did. 223 00:12:56,840 --> 00:13:00,079 Speaker 1: I'm going Bush and Schobert. Yeah, he's a show just 224 00:13:00,160 --> 00:13:04,920 Speaker 1: made a Pro Bowl. I'm sorry. Yeah, I think that's easy. No, 225 00:13:05,080 --> 00:13:07,120 Speaker 1: I think about him. Not a good group though. No 226 00:13:08,600 --> 00:13:11,800 Speaker 1: defensive backfield, pul trade and edge and a running back 227 00:13:11,800 --> 00:13:14,600 Speaker 1: for a line here taking three cornerbacks, so you're three 228 00:13:14,679 --> 00:13:21,080 Speaker 1: three corners. I have to go Humphrey, mm hmm. I'm 229 00:13:21,120 --> 00:13:24,800 Speaker 1: gonna go Ward. I can't disagree with those two picks. 230 00:13:26,160 --> 00:13:30,640 Speaker 1: Hayden over Peters, I agree. I I am. Peters isn't 231 00:13:30,679 --> 00:13:34,440 Speaker 1: for me, as you know, I'm not a Marcus Peters fan. There. Uh. 232 00:13:34,440 --> 00:13:37,800 Speaker 1: He gives up as much as he gets, you know. 233 00:13:37,840 --> 00:13:40,120 Speaker 1: He's a swing for the fences guy, and sometimes they 234 00:13:40,120 --> 00:13:42,600 Speaker 1: strike out. I also think he's sort of the opposite 235 00:13:42,640 --> 00:13:45,920 Speaker 1: of a leader, where Hayden as a leader. Um. I 236 00:13:46,000 --> 00:13:48,360 Speaker 1: might regret taking Hayden at this stage of his career, 237 00:13:48,400 --> 00:13:50,120 Speaker 1: but from where they are right now, I still a 238 00:13:50,120 --> 00:13:52,240 Speaker 1: faith in him. I think Hayden, from what I've seen, 239 00:13:53,679 --> 00:13:56,040 Speaker 1: still has the above the next stuff that makes him 240 00:13:56,080 --> 00:14:01,360 Speaker 1: just a tick better than most who are we not 241 00:14:01,480 --> 00:14:04,480 Speaker 1: considering I mean rookies are hard to put on this list. 242 00:14:04,480 --> 00:14:08,000 Speaker 1: But there's a first round rookie newsom you know. I mean, Um, 243 00:14:08,160 --> 00:14:10,640 Speaker 1: Troy Hill is not a bad player at all. I 244 00:14:10,640 --> 00:14:13,960 Speaker 1: mean he would be valuable for any of these teams. 245 00:14:14,360 --> 00:14:17,880 Speaker 1: Bengals done it much. I mean they have some guys 246 00:14:17,880 --> 00:14:19,960 Speaker 1: they've paid, but none of them to me, are that great. 247 00:14:20,000 --> 00:14:24,720 Speaker 1: They're not. Yeah, they're just guys. Um, what'ses face? Smith 248 00:14:24,800 --> 00:14:27,800 Speaker 1: with the with the Ravens is gone, is hard to 249 00:14:27,840 --> 00:14:31,120 Speaker 1: count on. So yeah, I mean Sutton might be in 250 00:14:31,160 --> 00:14:35,240 Speaker 1: the equation someday. Yeah, I mean it's almost, but it's 251 00:14:35,240 --> 00:14:37,440 Speaker 1: it's really those top four guys. And yeah, I think 252 00:14:37,480 --> 00:14:41,440 Speaker 1: it's Peters vers Smith. Isn't there anymore right, right? You know? Yeah, 253 00:14:41,520 --> 00:14:46,280 Speaker 1: I think it's Hayden versus Peters. Okay, they're very different, 254 00:14:46,720 --> 00:14:51,000 Speaker 1: very different. Safeties are easy, though, are they Who are 255 00:14:51,000 --> 00:14:56,280 Speaker 1: you taking? I'm taking Minca and uh Bates, that's who 256 00:14:56,280 --> 00:14:59,360 Speaker 1: they picked. There's not bad one. I mean, like the 257 00:14:59,400 --> 00:15:01,880 Speaker 1: Browns Now have a couple of interesting guys. I think 258 00:15:01,920 --> 00:15:07,280 Speaker 1: John Johnson would make most division lists. Um what's his face? 259 00:15:07,280 --> 00:15:10,520 Speaker 1: From the Ravens? The box dude that the blitzer is 260 00:15:10,640 --> 00:15:13,440 Speaker 1: the bad player. Yeah, not a bad player. Edmonds isn't 261 00:15:13,480 --> 00:15:16,280 Speaker 1: a bad player, but I think Manca is a is 262 00:15:16,360 --> 00:15:19,480 Speaker 1: number one on my list by far. I mean, that's 263 00:15:19,480 --> 00:15:21,240 Speaker 1: that's an easy that's an easy one you can't give 264 00:15:21,240 --> 00:15:24,440 Speaker 1: some Bengals. Some Bengals fans think that Bates and Bates 265 00:15:24,480 --> 00:15:26,560 Speaker 1: is better than Manca. I'm sorry, I don't. I think 266 00:15:26,560 --> 00:15:28,280 Speaker 1: man is the best. Safe. Here's the problem with taking 267 00:15:28,320 --> 00:15:31,200 Speaker 1: Minca and Bates on there. It's they're too free safe 268 00:15:31,240 --> 00:15:33,080 Speaker 1: they are they are I mean, now make it could 269 00:15:33,080 --> 00:15:36,840 Speaker 1: play strong, yeah, but that that's not the best use 270 00:15:36,840 --> 00:15:39,880 Speaker 1: of him. No, but this isn't This is exactly building. 271 00:15:39,920 --> 00:15:41,960 Speaker 1: I mean, I built the offense different. If Lamar is 272 00:15:41,960 --> 00:15:44,920 Speaker 1: our quarterback too, you know, maybe not it. This isn't 273 00:15:44,960 --> 00:15:48,360 Speaker 1: a Paula Mallou versus Ree kind of thing where they 274 00:15:48,360 --> 00:15:52,640 Speaker 1: play two different spots. Jesse Bates both play the same spot, 275 00:15:52,920 --> 00:15:55,280 Speaker 1: right and make it it's Patrick's better. Yeah, and they're 276 00:15:55,320 --> 00:15:57,920 Speaker 1: both really good at it. And frankly, I think Bates 277 00:15:57,960 --> 00:15:59,720 Speaker 1: would even be more of a household name if he 278 00:15:59,760 --> 00:16:01,840 Speaker 1: was on this team with that this pass rush and 279 00:16:01,880 --> 00:16:04,600 Speaker 1: you know, make benefits from being here more than he 280 00:16:04,640 --> 00:16:06,880 Speaker 1: did in Miami or if he was in Cincinnati. I 281 00:16:06,880 --> 00:16:08,960 Speaker 1: think he allowed him just to settle in and just 282 00:16:09,080 --> 00:16:11,720 Speaker 1: beat the free safety, not bump all over the defense. 283 00:16:12,080 --> 00:16:13,960 Speaker 1: And maybe I mean, if you had him and Bates, 284 00:16:14,200 --> 00:16:17,160 Speaker 1: I'd probably leave Bates in deep center and have make 285 00:16:17,200 --> 00:16:20,200 Speaker 1: it do more stuff. But then you're taking the best 286 00:16:20,240 --> 00:16:22,520 Speaker 1: center fielder out of the position, you know, I mean, 287 00:16:22,520 --> 00:16:26,840 Speaker 1: you're too high. It would be awesome, um against it. Yeah, 288 00:16:27,040 --> 00:16:28,760 Speaker 1: you'd be really you could be really aggressive with other 289 00:16:28,800 --> 00:16:30,960 Speaker 1: things with those two as you're too high. But then 290 00:16:31,000 --> 00:16:33,160 Speaker 1: they're you know, not near the line of scrimmage. But 291 00:16:33,200 --> 00:16:37,800 Speaker 1: that's a pretty good safety group. Uh. Their flexes, John Johnson, 292 00:16:38,960 --> 00:16:44,240 Speaker 1: just one more defensive guy. M take him over Peters, 293 00:16:45,680 --> 00:16:49,080 Speaker 1: take him over over one of the edge guys. I mean, 294 00:16:49,120 --> 00:16:51,200 Speaker 1: I know, like flexes is going to be more of 295 00:16:51,240 --> 00:16:54,200 Speaker 1: a secondary thing, and I get that, But I might 296 00:16:54,320 --> 00:17:02,320 Speaker 1: rather have h Hendrickson or Clowney or Ingram Houston then 297 00:17:02,360 --> 00:17:04,479 Speaker 1: I would John Johnson. But I get John Johnson. I mean, 298 00:17:04,560 --> 00:17:07,080 Speaker 1: if we're gonna throw out a Nickel package, he'd be 299 00:17:07,160 --> 00:17:10,280 Speaker 1: useful for sure. Yeah, he'd give us our best eleven 300 00:17:10,359 --> 00:17:16,760 Speaker 1: on third down specialists. Justin Justin Tucker is a kicker, yeah, 301 00:17:16,840 --> 00:17:19,160 Speaker 1: but Boss is good. He's good. It's not his fault. 302 00:17:19,200 --> 00:17:21,479 Speaker 1: He's not justin Tucker. No, Tucker is number one. It's 303 00:17:21,520 --> 00:17:23,720 Speaker 1: kind of make a conversation with Bates, you know. Yeah, 304 00:17:23,800 --> 00:17:29,359 Speaker 1: Tucker is better the punters Sam Cook, he's pretty darn accomplished. 305 00:17:29,400 --> 00:17:31,720 Speaker 1: He's been. He's starting to slip a little, but he's 306 00:17:31,720 --> 00:17:33,560 Speaker 1: not what he once was. I mean, there was a 307 00:17:33,600 --> 00:17:35,520 Speaker 1: time when he was a weapon. Oh yeah, he was 308 00:17:35,520 --> 00:17:37,320 Speaker 1: on the best of the league. Yeah, he's not a 309 00:17:37,520 --> 00:17:40,080 Speaker 1: Tucker's level, and he's always been overshadowed by Tucker. But 310 00:17:40,560 --> 00:17:44,040 Speaker 1: he's one of the better putters of this generation. Yeah. Um, 311 00:17:44,080 --> 00:17:46,400 Speaker 1: I don't know the Bengals specialist well enough, but they've 312 00:17:46,440 --> 00:17:50,159 Speaker 1: been very good on teams under Taylor and I not 313 00:17:50,400 --> 00:17:52,600 Speaker 1: real certain who their their putter is if he can 314 00:17:52,720 --> 00:17:56,639 Speaker 1: challenge for that. Um, I do think Harvin could be 315 00:17:56,640 --> 00:17:59,480 Speaker 1: the next one up, though it could be a year 316 00:17:59,520 --> 00:18:03,359 Speaker 1: from now, especially especially if Cooke starts to slip a 317 00:18:03,400 --> 00:18:08,040 Speaker 1: little bit more. Kevin Kevin Hubers their punter since Yeah, 318 00:18:08,040 --> 00:18:09,840 Speaker 1: I don't know the strengths of their special team. I 319 00:18:09,840 --> 00:18:12,159 Speaker 1: think it's more coverage and return guys. Yeah, so they 320 00:18:12,200 --> 00:18:15,199 Speaker 1: are very good with the return game. Um. For the 321 00:18:15,280 --> 00:18:21,320 Speaker 1: return game, they took Devin Daverney the dun Yeah, I 322 00:18:21,320 --> 00:18:25,879 Speaker 1: don't know who else would be in the equation. Whoever, 323 00:18:25,880 --> 00:18:30,720 Speaker 1: since he's been trotting out, there's been been pretty darn good. Yeah, 324 00:18:31,040 --> 00:18:32,840 Speaker 1: and he was pretty darn good at it, he is. 325 00:18:33,160 --> 00:18:35,119 Speaker 1: I think I take him over du Burnet I think 326 00:18:35,160 --> 00:18:39,520 Speaker 1: about it. Does Cleveland have a guy that stands out? 327 00:18:39,600 --> 00:18:42,640 Speaker 1: Not really to me really, but if I could take 328 00:18:43,400 --> 00:18:44,959 Speaker 1: I'm not gonna do Ray Ray. If I could take 329 00:18:45,000 --> 00:18:47,720 Speaker 1: Deonte Johnson and put him on there, he was pretty 330 00:18:47,720 --> 00:18:51,719 Speaker 1: good at it. Yeah, trying to think of even like 331 00:18:51,840 --> 00:18:53,639 Speaker 1: some of the other receivers in the league that I 332 00:18:53,680 --> 00:18:55,520 Speaker 1: don't know a lot of them have done return stuff 333 00:18:56,080 --> 00:18:58,600 Speaker 1: like a B didn't slide Odell in there. He used 334 00:18:58,640 --> 00:19:00,480 Speaker 1: to He used to do that way back way back 335 00:19:00,480 --> 00:19:05,080 Speaker 1: when when he was young. Yeah, I don't have a 336 00:19:05,080 --> 00:19:07,880 Speaker 1: great one for that. Interesting though, it's not a bad group. 337 00:19:08,119 --> 00:19:10,080 Speaker 1: It's not a bad you can put the other pretty 338 00:19:10,080 --> 00:19:12,840 Speaker 1: good team, yeah, I mean, I wonder how competitive that 339 00:19:12,840 --> 00:19:16,399 Speaker 1: would be against the other seven divisions. Your your old lines, 340 00:19:16,400 --> 00:19:21,760 Speaker 1: pretty darn good, your quarterbacks a top eight guy, I'm 341 00:19:21,800 --> 00:19:24,399 Speaker 1: just thinking eight. In terms of eight divisions, You're running 342 00:19:24,440 --> 00:19:27,760 Speaker 1: game is gonna be awesome. Tremendous, tremendous with the Browns 343 00:19:27,840 --> 00:19:32,359 Speaker 1: run blockers with Lamar chub and if you're gonna have 344 00:19:32,359 --> 00:19:34,240 Speaker 1: some of that running back depth, if you can sneak 345 00:19:34,280 --> 00:19:37,280 Speaker 1: that around there too, and your defensive front seven, your 346 00:19:37,320 --> 00:19:39,920 Speaker 1: pass rush is gonna be good, unbelievable. But the linebackers 347 00:19:39,920 --> 00:19:43,160 Speaker 1: are bad, not bad, but they're the front is awesome. 348 00:19:43,280 --> 00:19:45,160 Speaker 1: You give me one and Garrett coming off the edge 349 00:19:45,160 --> 00:19:46,879 Speaker 1: with two it and Heyward coming up the middle. It's 350 00:19:46,920 --> 00:19:49,720 Speaker 1: just the Steeler Garrett, you know what I mean. It 351 00:19:49,800 --> 00:19:52,840 Speaker 1: would be your trade ingram and that'd be a team. 352 00:19:52,960 --> 00:19:57,520 Speaker 1: Yeah with Garrett. Yeah, they might be anyway. That's fun. 353 00:19:57,640 --> 00:20:00,200 Speaker 1: And the cover guys aren't bad at all. Safeties are aesome. 354 00:20:00,240 --> 00:20:01,800 Speaker 1: It's probably the best pair of safety is in the league. 355 00:20:03,280 --> 00:20:05,280 Speaker 1: Division in the corners are pretty darn good. They're pretty 356 00:20:05,320 --> 00:20:07,120 Speaker 1: dumning good. I mean, of course it's an all star team, 357 00:20:07,160 --> 00:20:09,560 Speaker 1: but it's a really good division. That's how they should 358 00:20:09,600 --> 00:20:11,080 Speaker 1: do that instead of doing the Pro Bowl. That's what 359 00:20:11,080 --> 00:20:13,160 Speaker 1: they should do. Break it down by division by division, 360 00:20:13,600 --> 00:20:15,600 Speaker 1: get some kind of signing bonus or whatever for that 361 00:20:15,600 --> 00:20:18,200 Speaker 1: better right right right. It would be more controversy, would 362 00:20:18,160 --> 00:20:20,480 Speaker 1: be a little bit more more fun though they haven't 363 00:20:20,520 --> 00:20:23,040 Speaker 1: played like a mini game like one quarter each. They 364 00:20:23,119 --> 00:20:27,760 Speaker 1: both get like one series, one series for all the marvels. Interesting, 365 00:20:28,440 --> 00:20:29,960 Speaker 1: He's played off and then play a game at the 366 00:20:30,040 --> 00:20:32,640 Speaker 1: end of that. These are the last two standing. Let 367 00:20:32,680 --> 00:20:36,480 Speaker 1: them go play. Yeah, no, I mean it's something. It's 368 00:20:36,480 --> 00:20:40,159 Speaker 1: a fun exercise. Um, a couple of controversial ones. I 369 00:20:40,520 --> 00:20:43,800 Speaker 1: do think there's potential for some of the Steelers to 370 00:20:43,880 --> 00:20:47,320 Speaker 1: really make a name for themselves going forward. There green 371 00:20:47,440 --> 00:20:55,359 Speaker 1: to two offensive lineman, tight end, Connor running back without question. Yeah, 372 00:20:55,400 --> 00:20:57,560 Speaker 1: I mean Harris could be number one on any list 373 00:20:57,600 --> 00:21:02,040 Speaker 1: a year from now. Yeah, I think he's special. I 374 00:21:02,040 --> 00:21:04,879 Speaker 1: think there's there's a lot there. We talked about this before, 375 00:21:05,000 --> 00:21:07,800 Speaker 1: like if you again. God asked this a lot pre draft, 376 00:21:07,840 --> 00:21:10,720 Speaker 1: Like where do you put him compared to last year's 377 00:21:10,760 --> 00:21:14,000 Speaker 1: running backs? Yeah? I would have had him number one 378 00:21:14,680 --> 00:21:17,359 Speaker 1: me too, just ahead of Dobbins. I had as much 379 00:21:17,400 --> 00:21:19,560 Speaker 1: as you and I like Dobbins a year ago. I 380 00:21:19,560 --> 00:21:21,400 Speaker 1: haven't changed my opinion on him at all. He did 381 00:21:21,440 --> 00:21:23,399 Speaker 1: not seem good. Change, but I would make that trade 382 00:21:23,480 --> 00:21:26,640 Speaker 1: right now. I like Harris better as a receiver. Yeah, 383 00:21:27,119 --> 00:21:29,360 Speaker 1: I like his size and his length and his strength 384 00:21:29,880 --> 00:21:32,160 Speaker 1: or Dobbins might have a little more juice, a little 385 00:21:32,160 --> 00:21:35,000 Speaker 1: more home run hitter, and he's a really good player. 386 00:21:35,800 --> 00:21:38,440 Speaker 1: But usually I mean, if you're making those type of 387 00:21:38,480 --> 00:21:42,399 Speaker 1: conversations and I have one year of NFL tape to 388 00:21:42,440 --> 00:21:45,159 Speaker 1: go off of, I'm gonna take that guy. But I 389 00:21:45,160 --> 00:21:47,439 Speaker 1: feel strong enough that I would not take that guy 390 00:21:47,680 --> 00:21:50,000 Speaker 1: like he when he was looking at coming out last 391 00:21:50,040 --> 00:21:53,320 Speaker 1: year and then didn't. I was thinking he might have 392 00:21:53,359 --> 00:21:56,199 Speaker 1: been the best guy last year, just based off of 393 00:21:56,240 --> 00:21:57,680 Speaker 1: what he did two years ago in college and the 394 00:21:57,840 --> 00:22:00,760 Speaker 1: trades we didn't change. No, no, would you trade him 395 00:22:00,800 --> 00:22:04,040 Speaker 1: for any back in the division straight up right now, 396 00:22:04,960 --> 00:22:10,640 Speaker 1: including Character Mixon and Hunt contract Chub would be a conversation. 397 00:22:11,080 --> 00:22:13,399 Speaker 1: But I mean including his contract and his age and 398 00:22:13,440 --> 00:22:16,080 Speaker 1: all that, because I think that Chubb can catch the 399 00:22:16,119 --> 00:22:18,399 Speaker 1: ball too. I don't think they just don't throw it 400 00:22:18,400 --> 00:22:20,960 Speaker 1: to him. No, I mean, I don't think he can 401 00:22:21,359 --> 00:22:25,840 Speaker 1: run routes anywhere, and like Harris will Ward and can Um, 402 00:22:25,920 --> 00:22:28,000 Speaker 1: but I don't think he just drops the ball and 403 00:22:28,000 --> 00:22:31,600 Speaker 1: can't catch either. I think Chubb might be the one 404 00:22:31,600 --> 00:22:34,600 Speaker 1: of the top two or three just pure running backs. 405 00:22:34,840 --> 00:22:36,720 Speaker 1: I think guy with the ball in his hands in 406 00:22:36,760 --> 00:22:39,959 Speaker 1: the league. Because he's got the size and speed, like 407 00:22:40,000 --> 00:22:44,200 Speaker 1: he has a gear that Harris doesn't have. No, you're 408 00:22:44,359 --> 00:22:47,720 Speaker 1: I'm sent right. He will average more per carry throughout 409 00:22:47,800 --> 00:22:50,040 Speaker 1: his career because they'll have the six of thees Way 410 00:22:50,119 --> 00:22:51,560 Speaker 1: orders here what they manage. In fact, he's got a 411 00:22:51,600 --> 00:22:55,440 Speaker 1: better offensive and that too. Yeah. Um, if they offered it, though, 412 00:22:55,480 --> 00:22:57,480 Speaker 1: if they if the Browns called you up and said 413 00:22:57,800 --> 00:23:01,280 Speaker 1: we'll swap you Harris for Chub, I don't, I'd say no, 414 00:23:02,920 --> 00:23:05,240 Speaker 1: I think and not that he's even super young Harris, 415 00:23:05,280 --> 00:23:10,760 Speaker 1: but I think I wants to do in the lead 416 00:23:10,800 --> 00:23:13,240 Speaker 1: bell mode. Yeah. Yeah, I do think that the running 417 00:23:13,240 --> 00:23:16,440 Speaker 1: back catching passes is instrumental to what they want to 418 00:23:16,480 --> 00:23:18,720 Speaker 1: do on offense and has been lacking a little bit. Yeah. 419 00:23:18,800 --> 00:23:21,439 Speaker 1: I just I just think that he's the perfect Like 420 00:23:21,520 --> 00:23:23,520 Speaker 1: there's a reason why they were so giddy to get 421 00:23:23,600 --> 00:23:27,000 Speaker 1: him because he was exactly what they wanted. Yeah, Chub's 422 00:23:27,000 --> 00:23:30,800 Speaker 1: twenty five, so he's a year older too. Okay. I 423 00:23:30,840 --> 00:23:34,080 Speaker 1: thought Harris was turning soon or something. He turned in 424 00:23:34,080 --> 00:23:37,480 Speaker 1: the spring. Okay, that's a big deal. So two next years, 425 00:23:37,640 --> 00:23:39,919 Speaker 1: they both have had a fair amount of wear and 426 00:23:39,920 --> 00:23:42,000 Speaker 1: tear off their bodies for their age. I mean of course, 427 00:23:43,359 --> 00:23:47,280 Speaker 1: who in the league would you trade him for. I mean, 428 00:23:47,280 --> 00:23:51,000 Speaker 1: I'm talking contract age. The Giants call you right now 429 00:23:51,040 --> 00:23:52,840 Speaker 1: and say we'll send you a Sa Kwan for him. 430 00:23:53,680 --> 00:23:55,399 Speaker 1: I don't know if I can make that trade. Basically, 431 00:23:56,240 --> 00:23:58,199 Speaker 1: it's really hard to count on. We just killed Odell 432 00:23:58,200 --> 00:24:00,159 Speaker 1: Beckham for a sort of the same thing. Do it 433 00:24:00,200 --> 00:24:05,040 Speaker 1: for McCaffrey, he's coming off a big injury too, Yeah, 434 00:24:05,400 --> 00:24:07,840 Speaker 1: he's a special player. I do it for Kamara. Yeah, 435 00:24:09,560 --> 00:24:13,000 Speaker 1: it's a pretty short list. Elliott, No, No, not. Henry's 436 00:24:13,000 --> 00:24:16,000 Speaker 1: a lot of weird tear there. Henry's Henry Nelliott. Yeah. 437 00:24:16,040 --> 00:24:18,479 Speaker 1: I mean that's the there at the wall time. In 438 00:24:18,560 --> 00:24:22,240 Speaker 1: terms of carries. None of the rookies from last year. 439 00:24:22,280 --> 00:24:27,919 Speaker 1: Aaron Jones. No, but it's not a bad conversation. Gibson's 440 00:24:27,960 --> 00:24:31,160 Speaker 1: two unproven. Yeah, I'm just thinking, like first round running backs. 441 00:24:31,280 --> 00:24:35,040 Speaker 1: Eckler is not every down enough for me, and certainly 442 00:24:35,040 --> 00:24:36,520 Speaker 1: I wouldn't even consider him. And that would be my 443 00:24:36,520 --> 00:24:39,440 Speaker 1: word with McCaffrey a little. He could handle the wear 444 00:24:39,480 --> 00:24:42,000 Speaker 1: and tear, but he wouldn't touches two years ago. Yeah, 445 00:24:42,400 --> 00:24:45,040 Speaker 1: you would not be a super physical You have to change, 446 00:24:45,040 --> 00:24:46,879 Speaker 1: You have to change how you use your running backs 447 00:24:46,960 --> 00:24:49,520 Speaker 1: and your whole scheme, you know. I mean, he's a 448 00:24:49,520 --> 00:24:54,400 Speaker 1: great player. I probably would do it for McCaffrey. I mean, yeah, 449 00:24:54,480 --> 00:24:57,600 Speaker 1: I do it for McCaffrey, I do it for Kamara. 450 00:24:59,000 --> 00:25:02,159 Speaker 1: Might be about it, really, I mean might change a 451 00:25:02,240 --> 00:25:04,560 Speaker 1: year from now if I see Antonio Gibson be awesome, 452 00:25:04,800 --> 00:25:06,920 Speaker 1: I might consider that. But you also then have a 453 00:25:07,000 --> 00:25:10,399 Speaker 1: year of watching the right Yeah. I mean, youth is 454 00:25:10,480 --> 00:25:13,960 Speaker 1: so important at that position. Uh, you know, it's different 455 00:25:14,000 --> 00:25:17,680 Speaker 1: than wide receiver like Deante and Claypool are really good 456 00:25:17,720 --> 00:25:20,479 Speaker 1: young players are bright futures. But if you're gonna give 457 00:25:20,480 --> 00:25:22,960 Speaker 1: me a twenty seven year old receiver that I know 458 00:25:23,119 --> 00:25:25,240 Speaker 1: is good, of course you make the trade. You know, 459 00:25:25,800 --> 00:25:29,080 Speaker 1: Tyreek Hill or want Ad or something dig somebody like that, 460 00:25:29,080 --> 00:25:31,720 Speaker 1: because they just fade away slower. But having a rookie 461 00:25:31,800 --> 00:25:34,639 Speaker 1: running back, you're gonna be pretty special. I don't think 462 00:25:34,640 --> 00:25:37,640 Speaker 1: if Harris comes out last year at this time or two, 463 00:25:38,000 --> 00:25:42,760 Speaker 1: you know, in that draft, he's probably a chief right now. Yeah, 464 00:25:43,119 --> 00:25:46,760 Speaker 1: they would take him over the way he catches the football, 465 00:25:46,760 --> 00:25:48,639 Speaker 1: he'd be a much better in past protection. He'd be 466 00:25:48,680 --> 00:25:50,600 Speaker 1: your short yardage back. They kind of liked the bigger 467 00:25:50,640 --> 00:25:53,800 Speaker 1: backs anyways. Yeah, yeah, yeah, I think he would have 468 00:25:53,800 --> 00:25:56,199 Speaker 1: been the first back selected and the Steelers would not 469 00:25:56,200 --> 00:26:00,280 Speaker 1: consider trading him for Edwards Hi, not even not even Limps. 470 00:26:00,359 --> 00:26:02,760 Speaker 1: And I think he's still a good young player, but 471 00:26:03,240 --> 00:26:06,280 Speaker 1: he's a specialty guy. Yeah, No, I think you're right. 472 00:26:07,000 --> 00:26:12,040 Speaker 1: I don't know. Dobbins is a conversation still. I really 473 00:26:12,080 --> 00:26:17,640 Speaker 1: like Dobbins. Acres wouldn't have been about Jonathan Taylor. It's 474 00:26:17,640 --> 00:26:21,520 Speaker 1: pretty good. He's pretty good. The fumbles are still an issue. Yeah, 475 00:26:21,840 --> 00:26:23,800 Speaker 1: I think Harris will always be a better receiver. But 476 00:26:23,840 --> 00:26:29,119 Speaker 1: Taylor caught gonna run. He's he's fast, faster, faster, he 477 00:26:29,200 --> 00:26:33,639 Speaker 1: might be stronger, more explode, He's more explosive. Taylor's a 478 00:26:33,640 --> 00:26:36,240 Speaker 1: conversation more I think about it, you know, just those 479 00:26:36,320 --> 00:26:40,040 Speaker 1: last year backs for the Steelers. I'd rather have Taylor 480 00:26:40,119 --> 00:26:43,600 Speaker 1: than Dobbins. Yeah, Taylor be a good Steeler. Yeah, I 481 00:26:43,640 --> 00:26:45,640 Speaker 1: mean he would fit in around here. The Rooneys would 482 00:26:45,680 --> 00:26:48,640 Speaker 1: like him. Tomlin would like him, you know. And he's 483 00:26:48,640 --> 00:26:50,880 Speaker 1: got home run and he can catch enough. I don't 484 00:26:50,880 --> 00:26:52,399 Speaker 1: think I make that trade, but that would be a 485 00:26:52,480 --> 00:26:54,880 Speaker 1: tough one from you. Again, the thing that we died 486 00:26:54,960 --> 00:26:57,480 Speaker 1: him on at least I did last year was the fumbles. Yeah, 487 00:26:57,800 --> 00:27:00,840 Speaker 1: and that was the only real different between from me 488 00:27:00,920 --> 00:27:05,280 Speaker 1: between him and Dobbins was Yeah, here I expected Dobbins 489 00:27:05,320 --> 00:27:09,000 Speaker 1: to be a better receiver, not knowing landing spot. He's 490 00:27:09,040 --> 00:27:11,560 Speaker 1: in a bad spot to catch passes in Baltimore. So 491 00:27:11,600 --> 00:27:14,600 Speaker 1: are the wide receivers wide receivers and everyone is not 492 00:27:14,680 --> 00:27:18,080 Speaker 1: a tight end. Yeah. Interesting conversation though, I mean you 493 00:27:18,400 --> 00:27:21,320 Speaker 1: start looking at how you judge things against the rest 494 00:27:21,359 --> 00:27:24,160 Speaker 1: of the division or the league, or you know their 495 00:27:24,200 --> 00:27:28,080 Speaker 1: respective positions. They gets a couple of guys that are highly, 496 00:27:28,160 --> 00:27:30,359 Speaker 1: highly valuable. Would you trade f Oarmouth for any of 497 00:27:30,359 --> 00:27:34,600 Speaker 1: the young tight ends not named Pitts or Hawkinson? Oh? Yeah, 498 00:27:34,960 --> 00:27:38,159 Speaker 1: I have to let me think on that though. Kelsey no, Kiddle, no, 499 00:27:38,359 --> 00:27:42,760 Speaker 1: Waller No. Yes, kid is still young enough. I think 500 00:27:42,760 --> 00:27:46,200 Speaker 1: it was a superstar um if he misses some games. 501 00:27:46,240 --> 00:27:52,840 Speaker 1: So what imagine this offense with Kittle um tight ends? Hawkinson? Yes, Pitts, Yes? 502 00:27:55,080 --> 00:27:59,399 Speaker 1: How about like Faant No, I don't think so. I 503 00:27:59,400 --> 00:28:03,640 Speaker 1: don't think so. Maybe r Smith maybe, But I don't 504 00:28:03,680 --> 00:28:07,640 Speaker 1: know that he necessarily fits what they want to do, right. 505 00:28:08,280 --> 00:28:10,160 Speaker 1: I don't know that he's ever gonna be a great blocker. 506 00:28:10,359 --> 00:28:12,280 Speaker 1: I mean, I could come up with more, just because 507 00:28:12,560 --> 00:28:14,200 Speaker 1: I haven't seen enough of Friar Mouth to say that 508 00:28:14,240 --> 00:28:15,920 Speaker 1: he's a star, you know, I mean, I don't think 509 00:28:15,960 --> 00:28:19,160 Speaker 1: he's in this conversation where I mean I would rather 510 00:28:19,240 --> 00:28:23,520 Speaker 1: Dallas Goddard and then Friar Muth. Right now, he's just blocked. 511 00:28:23,560 --> 00:28:26,840 Speaker 1: And you know, there's certainly some guys would rather have, 512 00:28:26,880 --> 00:28:31,080 Speaker 1: Like at Johnny Smith Higbee. I wouldn't trade Higbee for him. 513 00:28:31,960 --> 00:28:34,320 Speaker 1: You're talking about the contract to remember, right, right, right 514 00:28:34,440 --> 00:28:38,880 Speaker 1: right Smith contract. That's a good point. That's a good point. No, 515 00:28:38,960 --> 00:28:41,360 Speaker 1: I would not make that trade for Johnny Smith or 516 00:28:41,480 --> 00:28:44,640 Speaker 1: Henry So that's interesting. I'm sure we could come up 517 00:28:44,680 --> 00:28:49,120 Speaker 1: with like eight names, probably but definitely Kittle. Yeah, we're 518 00:28:49,120 --> 00:28:51,640 Speaker 1: gonna take a break. He is Matt Williamson. I'm Dale Lelly. 519 00:28:51,920 --> 00:28:53,800 Speaker 1: We want to thank Jacob Breck for keeping us on 520 00:28:53,840 --> 00:28:55,320 Speaker 1: the air over the course of the show, and we 521 00:28:55,360 --> 00:28:57,800 Speaker 1: want to thank you for listening to this edition of 522 00:28:57,840 --> 00:29:00,240 Speaker 1: the Drive on Steelers Nation. Video