WEBVTT - Listener Mail: Intergalactic Planetary

0:00:03.040 --> 0:00:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind, a production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:09.680 --> 0:00:12.879
<v Speaker 2>Hey you welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind. Listener mail.

0:00:13.080 --> 0:00:14.120
<v Speaker 2>My name is Robert.

0:00:13.880 --> 0:00:17.200
<v Speaker 3>Lamb and I am Joe McCormick. And it's Monday, the

0:00:17.280 --> 0:00:19.720
<v Speaker 3>day of each week that we read back messages from

0:00:19.800 --> 0:00:23.040
<v Speaker 3>the Stuff to Blow Your Mind email address. If you

0:00:23.079 --> 0:00:25.040
<v Speaker 3>have never gotten in touch with us before, why not

0:00:25.079 --> 0:00:27.720
<v Speaker 3>give it a shot. You can email us at contact

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:31.240
<v Speaker 3>at stuff to Blow your Mind dot com. Whatever kind

0:00:31.240 --> 0:00:34.000
<v Speaker 3>of message you want to send is welcome. We sort

0:00:34.040 --> 0:00:37.440
<v Speaker 3>of always prioritize feedback to recent episodes, especially if you've

0:00:37.479 --> 0:00:39.880
<v Speaker 3>got something interesting you'd like to add to a topic

0:00:40.000 --> 0:00:43.320
<v Speaker 3>we talked about. But whatever it is, send it on it. Okay,

0:00:43.360 --> 0:00:45.680
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to kick things off with a response to

0:00:45.880 --> 0:00:49.360
<v Speaker 3>our couple of episodes about pouring oil over the water.

0:00:49.520 --> 0:00:53.800
<v Speaker 3>This was a series on the idea that oil poured

0:00:53.840 --> 0:00:56.480
<v Speaker 3>over the top of the sea would calm the waves

0:00:56.560 --> 0:00:59.800
<v Speaker 3>and how that sounds rather unbelievable but there actually is

0:00:59.840 --> 0:01:03.080
<v Speaker 3>some truth to it to a limited extent. But yeah,

0:01:03.520 --> 0:01:05.840
<v Speaker 3>interesting phenomenon. And this is also the one where we

0:01:05.880 --> 0:01:08.399
<v Speaker 3>got into the stories of Benjamin Franklin walking around with

0:01:08.440 --> 0:01:18.200
<v Speaker 3>a hollow cane and pouring oil in people's ponds. Matt says, Hey, guys,

0:01:18.280 --> 0:01:20.760
<v Speaker 3>I was just listening to your first Oil and Troubled

0:01:20.800 --> 0:01:22.760
<v Speaker 3>Waters episode, and I thought I would share some of

0:01:22.760 --> 0:01:25.640
<v Speaker 3>the things that came to mind while listening. During the episode,

0:01:25.640 --> 0:01:29.160
<v Speaker 3>it seemed to be implied that given time, oil would

0:01:29.200 --> 0:01:32.800
<v Speaker 3>simply spread to cover the entire surface of water that

0:01:32.840 --> 0:01:35.840
<v Speaker 3>it was poured into. But this isn't the case. As

0:01:35.880 --> 0:01:38.399
<v Speaker 3>may come as no surprise, oil and water don't like

0:01:38.440 --> 0:01:40.680
<v Speaker 3>to interact with each other so much so that they

0:01:40.720 --> 0:01:44.440
<v Speaker 3>will actively position themselves in such a way to minimize

0:01:44.480 --> 0:01:48.160
<v Speaker 3>the area where the oil contacts the water, so far

0:01:48.200 --> 0:01:52.880
<v Speaker 3>as gravity, buoyancy, surface tension, etc. Will allow. As an example,

0:01:52.880 --> 0:01:55.160
<v Speaker 3>if you put a small drop of oil into water,

0:01:55.240 --> 0:01:59.040
<v Speaker 3>the oil will turn into a small bead as close

0:01:59.080 --> 0:02:02.760
<v Speaker 3>to a sphere the aforementioned factors will allow. This is

0:02:02.800 --> 0:02:06.639
<v Speaker 3>specifically because a sphere provides the smallest possible surface area

0:02:06.840 --> 0:02:10.680
<v Speaker 3>for a given volume, thus minimizing the interface between the

0:02:10.720 --> 0:02:13.639
<v Speaker 3>oil and the water. Now, something I think is pretty

0:02:13.639 --> 0:02:16.000
<v Speaker 3>cool that happens at the point of interface is the

0:02:16.040 --> 0:02:19.720
<v Speaker 3>water actually forms what amounts to a one atom thick

0:02:20.040 --> 0:02:24.399
<v Speaker 3>layer of ice. This is because the water molecules really

0:02:24.440 --> 0:02:27.480
<v Speaker 3>want to form hydrogen bonds, but this isn't possible with

0:02:27.520 --> 0:02:31.320
<v Speaker 3>the oils, and in overly simplified terms, it has to

0:02:31.440 --> 0:02:34.440
<v Speaker 3>double down on the bonds with the other water molecules

0:02:34.480 --> 0:02:37.160
<v Speaker 3>around it, forming into a structure like you would normally

0:02:37.240 --> 0:02:40.760
<v Speaker 3>find in ice. Ah, that's interesting that I had no idea,

0:02:41.240 --> 0:02:44.799
<v Speaker 3>Matt says. I studied molecular biology, and these thoughts also

0:02:44.880 --> 0:02:47.600
<v Speaker 3>reminded me of how the same kind of effect of

0:02:47.639 --> 0:02:51.440
<v Speaker 3>oil plumping together to minimize contact with water also affects

0:02:51.480 --> 0:02:56.239
<v Speaker 3>how proteins fold and become relatively stable in their intended structure.

0:02:56.560 --> 0:02:59.079
<v Speaker 3>You see, proteins are made up of segments that are

0:02:59.080 --> 0:03:03.120
<v Speaker 3>either hydrophilic meaning they like water, or hydrophobic, meaning they

0:03:03.120 --> 0:03:06.480
<v Speaker 3>don't like water, and the same physics that causes the

0:03:06.520 --> 0:03:10.120
<v Speaker 3>oil to clump also causes the hydrophobic segments to bury

0:03:10.160 --> 0:03:13.560
<v Speaker 3>themselves in the protein structure, away from the water surrounding

0:03:13.560 --> 0:03:17.640
<v Speaker 3>it and leaving the hydrophilic segments on the outside. It

0:03:17.720 --> 0:03:21.560
<v Speaker 3>sometimes takes some trial and error to help to get there,

0:03:21.880 --> 0:03:24.720
<v Speaker 3>but proteins use this to form and maintain their most

0:03:24.720 --> 0:03:27.800
<v Speaker 3>stable structure and the one that allows them to function.

0:03:28.360 --> 0:03:31.080
<v Speaker 3>Thanks for providing such breadth and depth in so many

0:03:31.120 --> 0:03:34.880
<v Speaker 3>topics to keep us entertained and educated. Matt, Well, thank

0:03:34.880 --> 0:03:37.120
<v Speaker 3>you for the insight, Matt. And that was really interesting

0:03:37.160 --> 0:03:41.440
<v Speaker 3>about the one molecule thick layer of ice at the interfew.

0:03:41.760 --> 0:03:44.360
<v Speaker 3>I'd never read or heard anything about that, but yeah,

0:03:44.360 --> 0:03:46.400
<v Speaker 3>I guess it would be good to clarify what is

0:03:46.440 --> 0:03:49.960
<v Speaker 3>happening with the oil in the water. And it is

0:03:50.080 --> 0:03:53.760
<v Speaker 3>interesting that we get these seemingly opposite reactions because you

0:03:53.760 --> 0:03:57.280
<v Speaker 3>can observe it like if you dump a drop of

0:03:57.320 --> 0:04:01.440
<v Speaker 3>oil into water and it sinks. If it sinks, it

0:04:01.520 --> 0:04:04.600
<v Speaker 3>will form this spherical ball that will float within the water,

0:04:04.680 --> 0:04:07.960
<v Speaker 3>eventually rising to the surface, and the oil will be

0:04:08.000 --> 0:04:11.080
<v Speaker 3>trying to cling to itself and repel contact with the water,

0:04:11.160 --> 0:04:13.960
<v Speaker 3>which is why it forms a sphere like that. It doesn't,

0:04:14.040 --> 0:04:15.760
<v Speaker 3>you know, it doesn't want to mix with the water.

0:04:16.560 --> 0:04:20.320
<v Speaker 3>But conversely, like we talked about in these two episodes,

0:04:20.480 --> 0:04:22.960
<v Speaker 3>some oils, when they float on top of the water

0:04:23.120 --> 0:04:25.520
<v Speaker 3>end up spreading out to form a film that is

0:04:25.600 --> 0:04:29.400
<v Speaker 3>one molecule thick. Why exactly does that happen? What's going

0:04:29.440 --> 0:04:32.920
<v Speaker 3>on at the molecular level. Well, I was just digging

0:04:32.960 --> 0:04:35.960
<v Speaker 3>through some chemistry textbooks to try to find the answer

0:04:35.960 --> 0:04:38.600
<v Speaker 3>to this, make sure I understood before commenting, and I

0:04:38.640 --> 0:04:41.000
<v Speaker 3>think I've got it figured out. So, first of all,

0:04:41.279 --> 0:04:44.960
<v Speaker 3>not all oils will spread out over the water's surface

0:04:45.200 --> 0:04:50.440
<v Speaker 3>like this. For example, paraffin oils like kerosene will not

0:04:50.520 --> 0:04:53.480
<v Speaker 3>spread out evenly on top of the water, while most

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:57.640
<v Speaker 3>vegetable oils, the commonly used example in the experiments we've

0:04:57.640 --> 0:05:01.480
<v Speaker 3>talked about was pure olive oil, they do spread out

0:05:01.520 --> 0:05:05.080
<v Speaker 3>to form the monolayer. So what makes the difference? Well,

0:05:05.200 --> 0:05:09.119
<v Speaker 3>I found part of an answer in a book called

0:05:09.160 --> 0:05:13.359
<v Speaker 3>Physical Chemistry, Experimental and Theoretical by Gordon Van Prague. This

0:05:13.520 --> 0:05:18.520
<v Speaker 3>is Cambridge University Press, nineteen fifty and Van Prague clarifies

0:05:18.600 --> 0:05:24.880
<v Speaker 3>that quote substances whose molecules contain water soluble groups such

0:05:24.920 --> 0:05:29.880
<v Speaker 3>as cooh ANDCH two oh, et cetera. And then a

0:05:29.960 --> 0:05:34.960
<v Speaker 3>parenthetical long chain acids and alcohols will spread into surface

0:05:35.000 --> 0:05:39.039
<v Speaker 3>films on water. So according to this source, it is

0:05:39.320 --> 0:05:43.080
<v Speaker 3>large oil molecules that have some kind of water attracted

0:05:43.560 --> 0:05:47.400
<v Speaker 3>arm somewhere on them, somewhere on the molecule. So if

0:05:47.440 --> 0:05:50.599
<v Speaker 3>you picture a molecule sort of like a tree, one

0:05:50.720 --> 0:05:54.479
<v Speaker 3>branch of that molecule tree is water soluble, and this

0:05:54.600 --> 0:05:57.480
<v Speaker 3>type of arm on the molecule structure that has its

0:05:57.480 --> 0:06:00.840
<v Speaker 3>own reactive tendencies is called a group or functional group

0:06:00.880 --> 0:06:04.360
<v Speaker 3>in chemistry. So in oils with this particular structure, what

0:06:04.480 --> 0:06:07.840
<v Speaker 3>happens Well? I found more elaboration that helped clarify it

0:06:07.960 --> 0:06:11.520
<v Speaker 3>in another book, this time a physics book by Eric M.

0:06:11.640 --> 0:06:15.159
<v Speaker 3>Rogers called Physics for the Inquiring Mind The Methods, Nature

0:06:15.160 --> 0:06:18.719
<v Speaker 3>and Philosophy of Physical Science. This is Princeton University Press,

0:06:18.760 --> 0:06:21.920
<v Speaker 3>twenty eleven. So Rogers is in the middle of talking

0:06:21.960 --> 0:06:24.840
<v Speaker 3>about the experiments of Lord Rayleigh, which we brought up

0:06:24.920 --> 0:06:28.479
<v Speaker 3>in those episodes, and speaking of Lord Rayleigh, he says

0:06:28.520 --> 0:06:31.640
<v Speaker 3>he pictured a spreading drop of oil as a huddle

0:06:31.760 --> 0:06:35.760
<v Speaker 3>of molecules tumbling and crawling over each other till each

0:06:36.040 --> 0:06:39.480
<v Speaker 3>reached the water surface and could hitch one end to water.

0:06:40.000 --> 0:06:43.960
<v Speaker 3>For these oils have long chain molecules with a water

0:06:44.120 --> 0:06:48.239
<v Speaker 3>liking chemical group at one end. Once all the oil

0:06:48.279 --> 0:06:51.400
<v Speaker 3>molecules are thus attached, they should keep together in a

0:06:51.440 --> 0:06:56.080
<v Speaker 3>monomolecular carpet, showing little tendency to spread more. With just

0:06:56.279 --> 0:06:59.400
<v Speaker 3>enough oil for a given water surface, the layer would

0:06:59.400 --> 0:07:03.640
<v Speaker 3>be one molecule thick, with the molecules packed close and upright,

0:07:04.000 --> 0:07:08.919
<v Speaker 3>like the pile of velvet. With less oil, patches of

0:07:08.960 --> 0:07:11.880
<v Speaker 3>open water should be revealed. With more oil, there should

0:07:11.880 --> 0:07:15.360
<v Speaker 3>be excess puddles on the water, as on a greasy soup.

0:07:15.760 --> 0:07:17.920
<v Speaker 3>So I think that clarifies the answer. First of all,

0:07:18.000 --> 0:07:20.440
<v Speaker 3>whether or not the oil spreads out to become one

0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:23.240
<v Speaker 3>molecule thick on the surface of water depends on the

0:07:23.240 --> 0:07:26.920
<v Speaker 3>type of oil. It is oil molecules with a water

0:07:27.000 --> 0:07:31.400
<v Speaker 3>soluble group somewhere on them that do this. And it

0:07:31.440 --> 0:07:34.360
<v Speaker 3>happens because they all line up so that the water

0:07:34.480 --> 0:07:38.080
<v Speaker 3>attracted arm of the molecule is pointed down at the

0:07:38.120 --> 0:07:41.760
<v Speaker 3>water and the unattracted mass of the molecule is pointing

0:07:41.880 --> 0:07:44.880
<v Speaker 3>up away from the water, and they arrange themselves in

0:07:44.960 --> 0:07:49.160
<v Speaker 3>a single massive sheet layer, all oriented in the same

0:07:49.200 --> 0:07:49.840
<v Speaker 3>way like this.

0:07:50.680 --> 0:07:53.960
<v Speaker 2>Hmm, all right, right, that's illuminating. We still don't know

0:07:54.000 --> 0:07:57.160
<v Speaker 2>exactly what kind of oil Benjamin Franklin had in his cane.

0:07:56.960 --> 0:07:59.160
<v Speaker 3>Though I think it was olive oil.

0:07:59.440 --> 0:08:01.400
<v Speaker 2>You think so, yeah, I mean it would it would

0:08:01.440 --> 0:08:03.360
<v Speaker 2>make the most sense, right, And if what if your

0:08:03.440 --> 0:08:07.960
<v Speaker 2>cane were to leak unexpectedly, what kind of oil would

0:08:08.040 --> 0:08:10.640
<v Speaker 2>you want to have to deal with. I mean, obviously,

0:08:10.720 --> 0:08:12.000
<v Speaker 2>olive oil is not that bad.

0:08:12.640 --> 0:08:14.400
<v Speaker 3>Can you imagine how gross it would be to have

0:08:14.440 --> 0:08:17.680
<v Speaker 3>a cane that just leaks oil sometimes, like you're out

0:08:17.720 --> 0:08:20.480
<v Speaker 3>walking and oh it's coming out again. Oh I got

0:08:20.560 --> 0:08:23.640
<v Speaker 3>oil all over my hand. Oh boy, you go give

0:08:23.680 --> 0:08:24.960
<v Speaker 3>somebody a greasy handshake.

0:08:27.520 --> 0:08:29.520
<v Speaker 2>All right, Well, on that note, let's turn to some

0:08:29.560 --> 0:08:34.920
<v Speaker 2>of our listener mails concerning our recent episodes about anomaloust

0:08:35.000 --> 0:08:45.079
<v Speaker 2>photos and those photos possible connections to ancient aliens, ancient civilizations,

0:08:45.160 --> 0:08:46.880
<v Speaker 2>or anything else you want to connect to them.

0:08:46.920 --> 0:08:49.840
<v Speaker 3>If you're new to the show, to clarify meaning that

0:08:49.920 --> 0:08:52.600
<v Speaker 3>some people thought that and we don't. Right.

0:08:53.880 --> 0:08:57.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's made for a good discussion across three episodes anyway.

0:08:57.840 --> 0:09:05.600
<v Speaker 2>Mark writes then and says, Hi, guys, I'm listening to

0:09:05.640 --> 0:09:09.480
<v Speaker 2>your episodes on enigmatic objects in photos this week. I

0:09:09.600 --> 0:09:12.640
<v Speaker 2>like your take on walking through the debunking of these

0:09:12.679 --> 0:09:15.880
<v Speaker 2>types of photos. The whole low resolution theory on how

0:09:15.920 --> 0:09:19.600
<v Speaker 2>these photos become misunderstood is great. Something that came to

0:09:19.720 --> 0:09:22.760
<v Speaker 2>mind was that I don't even really need to know

0:09:22.840 --> 0:09:27.040
<v Speaker 2>anything about a particular photo, citing, etc. To know that

0:09:27.080 --> 0:09:30.720
<v Speaker 2>aliens haven't visited us. That's because I think most people

0:09:30.800 --> 0:09:34.400
<v Speaker 2>hugely underestimate the level of technology required to take an

0:09:34.440 --> 0:09:38.840
<v Speaker 2>interstellar trip. Not to say that interstellar travel is impossible,

0:09:39.240 --> 0:09:42.000
<v Speaker 2>just that it is very, very hard. As humans were

0:09:42.080 --> 0:09:45.800
<v Speaker 2>used to failing at spaceflight, We've seen so many rocket crashes,

0:09:45.880 --> 0:09:49.000
<v Speaker 2>satellite deorbits, and media about crashing your spaceship on an

0:09:49.000 --> 0:09:51.960
<v Speaker 2>alien moon. The thing is, we as humans are just

0:09:52.040 --> 0:09:54.440
<v Speaker 2>really bad at spaceflight at this point in our history.

0:09:54.720 --> 0:09:57.760
<v Speaker 2>We take this bias into how we imagine aliens might

0:09:57.760 --> 0:10:01.000
<v Speaker 2>interact with spaceflight, as if it might be common that

0:10:01.040 --> 0:10:03.839
<v Speaker 2>they would crash or be seen without wanting to be seen.

0:10:04.280 --> 0:10:07.560
<v Speaker 2>The level of technology required to literally compress space in

0:10:07.600 --> 0:10:09.720
<v Speaker 2>front of your spaceship so that you can get from

0:10:09.760 --> 0:10:12.040
<v Speaker 2>star to star in anything less than an eon is

0:10:12.120 --> 0:10:15.839
<v Speaker 2>absolutely massive. I've seen estimates that it would require something

0:10:15.840 --> 0:10:18.439
<v Speaker 2>on the order of all the energy contained in Jupiter's

0:10:18.440 --> 0:10:20.600
<v Speaker 2>mass to be able to achieve such a thing, even

0:10:20.640 --> 0:10:24.720
<v Speaker 2>for a short time. Aliens with that kind of technology

0:10:24.760 --> 0:10:27.720
<v Speaker 2>will have mastered the physical world. They won't be crashing

0:10:27.720 --> 0:10:31.000
<v Speaker 2>in roswell leaving alien corpses. They won't be placing visible

0:10:31.040 --> 0:10:34.120
<v Speaker 2>beacons on our seafloor. They won't be Whoopsie, we turned

0:10:34.160 --> 0:10:36.800
<v Speaker 2>on our headlights too bright and a fighter jet solace.

0:10:37.240 --> 0:10:40.280
<v Speaker 2>Those are human like errors that we expect but aren't realistic.

0:10:40.720 --> 0:10:43.199
<v Speaker 2>We will either see them because they want us to see,

0:10:43.640 --> 0:10:46.160
<v Speaker 2>or we won't see them. That paired to the fact

0:10:46.200 --> 0:10:49.960
<v Speaker 2>that many, many scientists dedicate their entire lives to detecting

0:10:50.000 --> 0:10:54.120
<v Speaker 2>alien life with the most sophisticated technology we have and

0:10:54.200 --> 0:10:57.559
<v Speaker 2>haven't come up with anything yet, it makes any testimony

0:10:57.760 --> 0:11:01.479
<v Speaker 2>these supposed alien experts give to Congress ridiculous and unbelievable

0:11:01.559 --> 0:11:04.520
<v Speaker 2>in my opinion, even without knowing anything more than how

0:11:04.520 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 2>the universe works on a physical level. Give have the

0:11:06.920 --> 0:11:10.560
<v Speaker 2>great work. Mark ps. Here's a photo of my friend

0:11:10.640 --> 0:11:14.079
<v Speaker 2>on our recent road trip through Roswell. We went to Carlsbad,

0:11:14.120 --> 0:11:16.520
<v Speaker 2>New Mexico to visit the caverns there and they were

0:11:16.559 --> 0:11:21.640
<v Speaker 2>absolutely life changingly interesting. Some intriguing history on cave exploring

0:11:21.920 --> 0:11:24.960
<v Speaker 2>comes from there, too, might be worth looking into as

0:11:25.000 --> 0:11:26.000
<v Speaker 2>an episode topic.

0:11:26.320 --> 0:11:29.040
<v Speaker 3>Oh man, yeah, the history of cave exploration. I think

0:11:29.120 --> 0:11:32.880
<v Speaker 3>it could be a great subject for us. But I

0:11:32.880 --> 0:11:35.360
<v Speaker 3>do want to comment on your photo here of your

0:11:35.400 --> 0:11:38.440
<v Speaker 3>friend posing next to Is this like a statue of

0:11:38.480 --> 0:11:42.320
<v Speaker 3>an alien installed about ten feet from the door of

0:11:42.360 --> 0:11:47.880
<v Speaker 3>a McDonald's. That's McDonald's, right, I don't know. I don't

0:11:47.880 --> 0:11:52.679
<v Speaker 3>recognize the branding there. So does the alien statue belong

0:11:52.800 --> 0:11:55.800
<v Speaker 3>to the McDonald's or is this a public monument somehow

0:11:55.840 --> 0:11:58.120
<v Speaker 3>situated in a McDonald's parking lot.

0:11:58.800 --> 0:12:00.880
<v Speaker 2>I don't know that. QP. See that sends for a

0:12:00.920 --> 0:12:03.280
<v Speaker 2>quarter pounder with cheeks, right, this has to be this

0:12:03.360 --> 0:12:04.480
<v Speaker 2>is a burger king, right.

0:12:04.960 --> 0:12:07.680
<v Speaker 3>Oh, I don't know. I mean it could be something else.

0:12:08.160 --> 0:12:11.000
<v Speaker 3>I saw McDonald's because I see like red and yellow.

0:12:11.040 --> 0:12:13.440
<v Speaker 3>That's McDonald's colors, isn't it.

0:12:13.559 --> 0:12:15.720
<v Speaker 2>I guess I don't know. I mean, we're as confused

0:12:15.760 --> 0:12:16.839
<v Speaker 2>as the aliens at this point.

0:12:17.600 --> 0:12:20.439
<v Speaker 3>If this alien does belong to the McDonald's, does does

0:12:20.559 --> 0:12:23.160
<v Speaker 3>do they just have like a lax corporate policy about

0:12:23.160 --> 0:12:25.920
<v Speaker 3>what kind of things franchise owners can put in the

0:12:25.920 --> 0:12:28.120
<v Speaker 3>parking lot? Could you put a statue of a t

0:12:28.280 --> 0:12:29.960
<v Speaker 3>rex in a McDonald's parking lot?

0:12:30.440 --> 0:12:33.360
<v Speaker 2>I mean, my guess is it's kind of like the different,

0:12:33.960 --> 0:12:38.600
<v Speaker 2>you know, public statues that you see endorsed by various cities,

0:12:38.679 --> 0:12:41.320
<v Speaker 2>where like, this is part of our identity now, and

0:12:41.400 --> 0:12:44.640
<v Speaker 2>therefore everyone who wants an alien statue in front of

0:12:44.640 --> 0:12:46.600
<v Speaker 2>their business can have one painted.

0:12:46.679 --> 0:12:49.560
<v Speaker 3>How you like you got the bronze fawns, you got

0:12:49.559 --> 0:12:54.440
<v Speaker 3>the RoboCop, you got the uh you got the McDonald's alien,

0:12:54.480 --> 0:12:59.160
<v Speaker 3>the quarter pounder alien. Yeah, but uh anyway, Sorry to

0:12:59.200 --> 0:13:01.200
<v Speaker 3>come back to the sub sense of your message, Mark,

0:13:01.840 --> 0:13:04.439
<v Speaker 3>I'm kind of two minds about this. On one hand,

0:13:04.760 --> 0:13:08.520
<v Speaker 3>the points you make are things that I'm sympathetic to,

0:13:08.720 --> 0:13:12.040
<v Speaker 3>and I used to be much more firmly in the

0:13:12.080 --> 0:13:17.160
<v Speaker 3>camp of you know, travel between stars is so difficult

0:13:17.920 --> 0:13:22.720
<v Speaker 3>that should massively wait our our starting I don't know

0:13:22.720 --> 0:13:26.360
<v Speaker 3>what you call it, the starting probability of us entertaining

0:13:26.360 --> 0:13:29.840
<v Speaker 3>ideas of alien visitation should wait that very low because

0:13:29.840 --> 0:13:32.760
<v Speaker 3>that's so difficult. Now I've kind of come around that

0:13:33.480 --> 0:13:35.520
<v Speaker 3>I don't think it's any more likely that we actually

0:13:35.520 --> 0:13:38.080
<v Speaker 3>have been visited by aliens. But I just don't place

0:13:38.120 --> 0:13:41.160
<v Speaker 3>as much emphasis on that kind of reasoning about the

0:13:41.200 --> 0:13:44.120
<v Speaker 3>difficulty of traveling between stars, because that's sort of another

0:13:44.160 --> 0:13:47.200
<v Speaker 3>one of those questions like the you know, I can't

0:13:47.320 --> 0:13:50.240
<v Speaker 3>understand how they could have done the work inside the

0:13:50.240 --> 0:13:54.120
<v Speaker 3>pyramids without leaving lamp black, so they must have had

0:13:54.160 --> 0:13:57.840
<v Speaker 3>electric lights. It's to be fair to you. It's not

0:13:57.920 --> 0:14:00.160
<v Speaker 3>quite that bad, but it is. It is sort of

0:14:00.160 --> 0:14:02.720
<v Speaker 3>in that zone of I can't see how someone could

0:14:02.720 --> 0:14:06.480
<v Speaker 3>have done this. Therefore it's very unlikely, you know, I

0:14:06.760 --> 0:14:09.720
<v Speaker 3>would allow that there's just lots of things we don't understand.

0:14:10.080 --> 0:14:12.080
<v Speaker 3>But on the other hand, I do see a kind

0:14:12.080 --> 0:14:14.600
<v Speaker 3>of I do see your point about the incongruity of

0:14:14.720 --> 0:14:18.720
<v Speaker 3>like the level of competence required to travel between stars,

0:14:18.760 --> 0:14:21.760
<v Speaker 3>have an interstellar civilization and visit the Earth, but then

0:14:21.840 --> 0:14:24.800
<v Speaker 3>also just be crashing all the time and showing up

0:14:24.800 --> 0:14:27.640
<v Speaker 3>on you know, appearing in the side view of a

0:14:27.680 --> 0:14:31.880
<v Speaker 3>jet fighter pilot's vision. That does seem kind of incongruous.

0:14:32.280 --> 0:14:34.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the whole idea that like, oh, we got a

0:14:34.440 --> 0:14:36.720
<v Speaker 2>warehouse full of them, We've just been rounding them up.

0:14:37.880 --> 0:14:39.800
<v Speaker 2>Every time there's a wreck, we throw it, throw it

0:14:39.840 --> 0:14:44.080
<v Speaker 2>into the warehouse, I don't know. I mean it. As

0:14:44.080 --> 0:14:47.200
<v Speaker 2>far as like the vast distances and times involved in

0:14:47.240 --> 0:14:50.280
<v Speaker 2>all of this, I mean it. It certainly adds to

0:14:50.320 --> 0:14:54.400
<v Speaker 2>the contemplation, like when I sort of do any kind

0:14:54.400 --> 0:14:59.840
<v Speaker 2>of like navel gazing and stargazing and thinking about human

0:15:00.360 --> 0:15:04.480
<v Speaker 2>and some other possible intelligent life out there with the

0:15:04.560 --> 0:15:08.240
<v Speaker 2>technology to move around and visit us, you know, I

0:15:08.240 --> 0:15:11.000
<v Speaker 2>mean you end up thinking about, like, well, what does

0:15:11.040 --> 0:15:16.040
<v Speaker 2>it mean for a civilization to have that kind of technology,

0:15:16.160 --> 0:15:18.640
<v Speaker 2>to have that kind of travel, that kind of reach,

0:15:19.080 --> 0:15:22.720
<v Speaker 2>to perhaps have to deal with very long periods of time,

0:15:23.560 --> 0:15:28.000
<v Speaker 2>to have to deal with perhaps a movement towards the inorganic.

0:15:28.040 --> 0:15:30.040
<v Speaker 2>I mean, there are just so many there, you know,

0:15:30.040 --> 0:15:34.240
<v Speaker 2>there's so many ideas about what such a civilization might

0:15:34.320 --> 0:15:38.520
<v Speaker 2>be like, and it's all built along around, you know,

0:15:38.640 --> 0:15:42.840
<v Speaker 2>guesses and best guesses based on what we think life

0:15:42.920 --> 0:15:46.320
<v Speaker 2>could be elsewhere in the universe. So I mean it's

0:15:46.520 --> 0:15:48.480
<v Speaker 2>I love thinking about it, but it's it's really hard

0:15:48.480 --> 0:15:50.800
<v Speaker 2>to come to any kind of, you know, firm conclusion.

0:15:51.240 --> 0:15:54.320
<v Speaker 3>I agree. I mean, I do love speculating about this

0:15:54.440 --> 0:15:57.160
<v Speaker 3>kind of stuff, but when it comes down to judging

0:15:57.200 --> 0:16:00.160
<v Speaker 3>what really has happened or not, I guess I think

0:16:00.200 --> 0:16:03.200
<v Speaker 3>it's fair to be humble about the limitations of our imagination,

0:16:03.520 --> 0:16:06.760
<v Speaker 3>you know, us just trying to speculate about what aliens

0:16:06.800 --> 0:16:10.960
<v Speaker 3>could or couldn't do. I don't know that there's that

0:16:11.000 --> 0:16:13.800
<v Speaker 3>it's that fruitful. But then to come back on the

0:16:13.880 --> 0:16:17.040
<v Speaker 3>other hand, like I have similar thoughts, Mark, I mean,

0:16:17.160 --> 0:16:20.880
<v Speaker 3>like one is how come how come like we're seeing

0:16:21.120 --> 0:16:25.400
<v Speaker 3>saucers all the time but there is like absolutely no

0:16:25.760 --> 0:16:29.840
<v Speaker 3>radio frequency communication at all. That seems like a really

0:16:29.920 --> 0:16:34.000
<v Speaker 3>strange kind of mismatch there, Like wouldn't we be more

0:16:34.160 --> 0:16:37.920
<v Speaker 3>likely to pick up radio frequency communications or some kind

0:16:37.960 --> 0:16:41.440
<v Speaker 3>of signal of some kind and not be seeing spaceships?

0:16:42.400 --> 0:16:44.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but then you can easily say, well, they don't

0:16:44.680 --> 0:16:46.920
<v Speaker 2>want you to. They're using a different bandwidth or something

0:16:46.920 --> 0:16:49.880
<v Speaker 2>that we just don't have access to. But then again

0:16:49.880 --> 0:16:53.320
<v Speaker 2>then you get into almost religious level where it's like, well,

0:16:54.040 --> 0:16:56.160
<v Speaker 2>of course you can't detect God, and then the answer

0:16:56.200 --> 0:16:59.480
<v Speaker 2>as well, if God is moving within the physical world,

0:16:59.560 --> 0:17:01.720
<v Speaker 2>then there might be like a footprint. There must be

0:17:01.760 --> 0:17:07.080
<v Speaker 2>some sort of sign that God has interacted with a

0:17:07.320 --> 0:17:11.359
<v Speaker 2>physics based world. So I don't know, you can just

0:17:11.440 --> 0:17:12.879
<v Speaker 2>run around in circles with all of this.

0:17:13.359 --> 0:17:16.000
<v Speaker 3>Well, yeah, actually this is a good comparison because while

0:17:16.040 --> 0:17:18.760
<v Speaker 3>I would say that I don't think you can use

0:17:18.800 --> 0:17:21.959
<v Speaker 3>science to prove that a god does not exist, you

0:17:21.960 --> 0:17:24.240
<v Speaker 3>can use science to prove that the Shroud of Turin

0:17:24.359 --> 0:17:29.600
<v Speaker 3>is a medieval forgery. And likewise, with like UFOs, I

0:17:29.600 --> 0:17:32.040
<v Speaker 3>don't think we have any way of saying like aliens

0:17:32.080 --> 0:17:35.080
<v Speaker 3>don't exist, or that you can know with certainty that

0:17:35.119 --> 0:17:37.359
<v Speaker 3>they've never been here. But you can look at the

0:17:37.520 --> 0:17:40.960
<v Speaker 3>supposed individual pieces of evidence and claims people make about

0:17:40.960 --> 0:17:43.240
<v Speaker 3>it and say like, yeah, this is not convincing.

0:17:44.119 --> 0:17:46.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah yeah, so yeah you can again, you can spend

0:17:46.960 --> 0:17:49.359
<v Speaker 2>all day thinking about this this sort of thing, and

0:17:49.520 --> 0:17:51.119
<v Speaker 2>there's so many ways to spend it, you know. Some

0:17:51.160 --> 0:17:54.040
<v Speaker 2>of some of the ways of thinking about it involve

0:17:54.160 --> 0:17:58.560
<v Speaker 2>casting humanity as the most interesting thing that an interstellar

0:17:58.600 --> 0:18:01.920
<v Speaker 2>civilization could come across. But you know, maybe we should

0:18:01.960 --> 0:18:05.800
<v Speaker 2>think of ourselves. If each planet that has life and

0:18:05.920 --> 0:18:09.879
<v Speaker 2>is observable to some hypothetical alien is like a television channel,

0:18:10.520 --> 0:18:14.600
<v Speaker 2>perhaps we are not like peak MTV, Perhaps we are

0:18:14.680 --> 0:18:18.320
<v Speaker 2>c SPAN and you know, and that kind of lines

0:18:18.400 --> 0:18:20.119
<v Speaker 2>up with the idea that you know, we shouldn't be

0:18:20.240 --> 0:18:23.320
<v Speaker 2>thinking about there being anything privileged about the human viewpoint

0:18:23.320 --> 0:18:26.800
<v Speaker 2>of the cosmos or human identity. Maybe yeah, maybe we're

0:18:26.840 --> 0:18:29.800
<v Speaker 2>just only marginally interesting maybe important at the end of

0:18:29.880 --> 0:18:31.760
<v Speaker 2>the day, but you know, not the kind of thing

0:18:31.800 --> 0:18:33.240
<v Speaker 2>you give a lot of attention to.

0:18:33.640 --> 0:18:36.959
<v Speaker 3>But anyway, thanks again Mark for getting in touch interesting thoughts,

0:18:37.000 --> 0:18:39.639
<v Speaker 3>and I once again I appreciate the idea about the

0:18:39.680 --> 0:18:41.960
<v Speaker 3>history of cave exploration. I think we could come back

0:18:42.000 --> 0:18:53.920
<v Speaker 3>to that absolutely. Okay, we got another response to our

0:18:53.960 --> 0:18:57.800
<v Speaker 3>episode on the El Tana antenna. This is from Chris.

0:18:58.240 --> 0:19:00.879
<v Speaker 3>Chris says, Dear Robert and Joe, after listening to a

0:19:00.960 --> 0:19:03.520
<v Speaker 3>recent episode on the Altana and antenna, the point you

0:19:03.600 --> 0:19:07.240
<v Speaker 3>were making about you were making regarding low quality data

0:19:07.280 --> 0:19:10.439
<v Speaker 3>being used to make extraordinary claims is well received and

0:19:10.520 --> 0:19:14.360
<v Speaker 3>indeed a common problem in the larger community of UFO enthusiasts.

0:19:14.840 --> 0:19:18.480
<v Speaker 3>In the episode, this concept is introduced by mentioning the

0:19:18.560 --> 0:19:23.119
<v Speaker 3>recent UFO hearings by the Congressional Oversight Committee. This is

0:19:23.160 --> 0:19:25.600
<v Speaker 3>something that happened in the United States Congress. If you're

0:19:25.640 --> 0:19:28.760
<v Speaker 3>not up to speed, basically, there was whistleblower testimony that

0:19:28.880 --> 0:19:34.199
<v Speaker 3>included claims from one whistleblower that essentially amounted to this

0:19:34.280 --> 0:19:37.639
<v Speaker 3>guy saying that other people in the government had told

0:19:37.720 --> 0:19:42.000
<v Speaker 3>him that the government was in possession of crashed alien

0:19:42.000 --> 0:19:47.160
<v Speaker 3>spacecraft and alien bodies and had been using that technology

0:19:47.160 --> 0:19:51.560
<v Speaker 3>to reverse engineer other types of technology. And I think

0:19:51.560 --> 0:19:54.080
<v Speaker 3>we were just saying, like, you know, remain open minded,

0:19:54.119 --> 0:19:56.679
<v Speaker 3>but at this point, it's just it's a guy saying

0:19:56.760 --> 0:19:59.959
<v Speaker 3>other people told him something, So I would reserve judgment

0:20:00.160 --> 0:20:04.280
<v Speaker 3>until any actual solid evidence is presented. So, coming back

0:20:04.320 --> 0:20:06.960
<v Speaker 3>to Chris's message, while it is an aside from the

0:20:07.000 --> 0:20:10.760
<v Speaker 3>main concept you were discussing, this investigation is important for

0:20:10.880 --> 0:20:15.360
<v Speaker 3>multiple reasons unrelated to extraterrestrial non human intelligence, and it's

0:20:15.400 --> 0:20:18.160
<v Speaker 3>worrisome that aliens are a reason people are tuning out.

0:20:18.560 --> 0:20:21.639
<v Speaker 3>The primary concern of the whistleblowers grush at all is

0:20:21.720 --> 0:20:25.520
<v Speaker 3>that is that government spending is occurring on technological research

0:20:25.880 --> 0:20:30.200
<v Speaker 3>and development is occurring without congressional oversight. Contrary to mandates

0:20:30.200 --> 0:20:33.560
<v Speaker 3>in the Constitution. It is against the law for whistleblowers

0:20:33.600 --> 0:20:36.560
<v Speaker 3>to release their information and evidence to the public, which

0:20:36.600 --> 0:20:40.159
<v Speaker 3>is the reason the hearing is taking place. It introduces

0:20:40.160 --> 0:20:43.399
<v Speaker 3>the problem so that laws can be introduced to allow

0:20:43.400 --> 0:20:46.919
<v Speaker 3>whistleblowers to bring forth their evidence and not be immediately

0:20:47.040 --> 0:20:51.720
<v Speaker 3>arrested for leaking classified information. Matters of pilot safety and

0:20:51.800 --> 0:20:55.080
<v Speaker 3>the failure to declassify documents to the public as required

0:20:55.400 --> 0:20:58.679
<v Speaker 3>are also center stage. Bills have already been introduced by

0:20:58.680 --> 0:21:01.480
<v Speaker 3>the Senate Majority Leader Chuck and may be worth a

0:21:01.560 --> 0:21:04.120
<v Speaker 3>read for those interested, But I wanted to point out

0:21:04.119 --> 0:21:09.119
<v Speaker 3>one particular section per the quote Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena Disclosure

0:21:09.160 --> 0:21:12.439
<v Speaker 3>Act of twenty twenty three, and then Chris includes a

0:21:12.480 --> 0:21:16.080
<v Speaker 3>link this is something that would require the disclosure if

0:21:16.160 --> 0:21:20.879
<v Speaker 3>such existed of recovered technologies of unknown origin and biological

0:21:20.920 --> 0:21:25.320
<v Speaker 3>evidence of non human intelligence. And then the I guess

0:21:25.400 --> 0:21:29.320
<v Speaker 3>the first item or statute from it exercise of imminent domain.

0:21:29.400 --> 0:21:32.879
<v Speaker 3>The Federal Government shall exercise imminent domain over any and

0:21:32.960 --> 0:21:37.040
<v Speaker 3>all recovered technologies of unknown origin and biological evidence of

0:21:37.080 --> 0:21:40.640
<v Speaker 3>non human intelligence that may be controlled by private persons

0:21:40.720 --> 0:21:43.720
<v Speaker 3>or entities in the interests of the public good. And

0:21:43.720 --> 0:21:47.679
<v Speaker 3>then back to Chris's message here, regardless of aliens, we

0:21:47.800 --> 0:21:50.520
<v Speaker 3>might look back in history and consider how certain laws

0:21:50.640 --> 0:21:54.760
<v Speaker 3>regarding matters of national security are interpreted and enforced, even

0:21:54.760 --> 0:21:58.120
<v Speaker 3>if UAPs are not real or aliens are not visiting US.

0:21:58.160 --> 0:22:00.600
<v Speaker 3>If this law passes, it may have very important use

0:22:00.920 --> 0:22:04.399
<v Speaker 3>to the US government. With the correct broad interpretation, perhaps

0:22:04.440 --> 0:22:07.280
<v Speaker 3>this law could be used to force companies doing business

0:22:07.320 --> 0:22:10.760
<v Speaker 3>on US soil to turn over any AI developed by

0:22:10.800 --> 0:22:14.160
<v Speaker 3>a foreign government or by another generative or self improving

0:22:14.240 --> 0:22:17.160
<v Speaker 3>AI system which may be considered to be a non

0:22:17.240 --> 0:22:21.040
<v Speaker 3>human intelligence. A non human intelligence may simply be quote

0:22:21.119 --> 0:22:25.719
<v Speaker 3>any AI, chatbot, etc. Regardless of actual levels of intelligence

0:22:25.800 --> 0:22:28.720
<v Speaker 3>or ability. We might imagine further legislation in the near

0:22:28.760 --> 0:22:32.760
<v Speaker 3>future that also allows the same imminent domain of non

0:22:32.840 --> 0:22:36.360
<v Speaker 3>human intelligence, regardless of source. I think this phrase will

0:22:36.359 --> 0:22:39.439
<v Speaker 3>be very important in future legislation and used to ensure

0:22:39.440 --> 0:22:42.400
<v Speaker 3>that the US government can take over any AI system

0:22:42.440 --> 0:22:46.960
<v Speaker 3>of sufficient capability or concern. Best regards Chris.

0:22:47.160 --> 0:22:48.200
<v Speaker 2>That's a lot to think about.

0:22:48.680 --> 0:22:52.719
<v Speaker 3>That's an interesting point regarding the idea that the real

0:22:53.040 --> 0:23:00.560
<v Speaker 3>purpose of the testimony is to try to force government

0:23:00.600 --> 0:23:05.800
<v Speaker 3>agents to disclose any knowledge they have of any knowledge

0:23:05.800 --> 0:23:09.320
<v Speaker 3>and any evidence they have of contact with aliens, alien technology,

0:23:09.400 --> 0:23:13.040
<v Speaker 3>alien bodies, whatever. I feel like this is something where

0:23:13.080 --> 0:23:16.439
<v Speaker 3>I hope like skeptics and UFO enthusiasts can be on

0:23:16.480 --> 0:23:18.920
<v Speaker 3>the same page about because I mean, obviously, I think

0:23:19.280 --> 0:23:22.159
<v Speaker 3>if the government had alien bodies and alien ships and

0:23:22.200 --> 0:23:24.680
<v Speaker 3>all that they should be open about that, I would

0:23:24.720 --> 0:23:29.240
<v Speaker 3>be in favor of transparency. Nobody with good faith wants

0:23:29.240 --> 0:23:33.080
<v Speaker 3>to cover up. At the same time, I think I

0:23:33.119 --> 0:23:35.600
<v Speaker 3>would acknowledge that while we're probably on the same page

0:23:35.600 --> 0:23:39.959
<v Speaker 3>about that, if they don't actually possess anything like that,

0:23:40.080 --> 0:23:42.960
<v Speaker 3>which I think is probably what's most likely the case.

0:23:44.400 --> 0:23:46.560
<v Speaker 3>Then all they could say is, well, we don't actually

0:23:46.600 --> 0:23:49.080
<v Speaker 3>have anything like that, weren't able to find it, in

0:23:49.119 --> 0:23:52.320
<v Speaker 3>which case the UFO enthusiasts can always just say, you know, aha,

0:23:52.400 --> 0:23:56.959
<v Speaker 3>see the cover up continues. So I don't know that's tricky,

0:23:57.000 --> 0:23:59.080
<v Speaker 3>but I certainly do favor transparency.

0:23:59.320 --> 0:24:01.680
<v Speaker 2>I feel like I've enough science fiction and horror and

0:24:01.720 --> 0:24:03.640
<v Speaker 2>read enough science fiction and horror though that I can

0:24:03.640 --> 0:24:07.040
<v Speaker 2>think of numerous scenarios in which I would be like, Okay,

0:24:07.320 --> 0:24:11.000
<v Speaker 2>cover up, great idea, let's do that. That truth is

0:24:11.040 --> 0:24:15.480
<v Speaker 2>too horrible, Like yeah, I'm not even gonna spitball any

0:24:15.720 --> 0:24:17.600
<v Speaker 2>any of the ideas here, but you know, you can

0:24:17.680 --> 0:24:20.640
<v Speaker 2>just think of various scenarios in which like, oh, oh,

0:24:20.840 --> 0:24:23.679
<v Speaker 2>it's much worse than we thought. The public is just

0:24:23.720 --> 0:24:24.959
<v Speaker 2>better off not knowing this.

0:24:25.520 --> 0:24:27.240
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, I mean, I wonder if there's like kind

0:24:27.240 --> 0:24:31.080
<v Speaker 3>of snow crash type scenario where knowledge of the aliens

0:24:31.280 --> 0:24:34.639
<v Speaker 3>entails like the activation of a virus in our brains

0:24:34.680 --> 0:24:36.600
<v Speaker 3>that would just cause all of our heads to melt

0:24:36.720 --> 0:24:37.159
<v Speaker 3>or something.

0:24:37.880 --> 0:24:43.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's just you know, some Lovecraftian revelation about the

0:24:43.760 --> 0:24:46.200
<v Speaker 2>nature of the outer cosmos, and it's just too much

0:24:46.240 --> 0:24:48.960
<v Speaker 2>to bear, or it's just like you know, it's instant

0:24:49.000 --> 0:24:53.520
<v Speaker 2>event horizon territory to really know what's up, I don't know.

0:24:53.800 --> 0:24:57.160
<v Speaker 2>I can think of scenarios. I can dream up scenarios

0:24:57.320 --> 0:25:00.760
<v Speaker 2>of varying degrees of ridiculousness that that make a cover

0:25:00.880 --> 0:25:02.600
<v Speaker 2>up sound like a good idea.

0:25:02.200 --> 0:25:05.960
<v Speaker 3>Well, event horizon scenarios aside, we will need eyes to

0:25:06.000 --> 0:25:08.600
<v Speaker 3>see where we're going, and so I do think transparency

0:25:08.680 --> 0:25:11.560
<v Speaker 3>is by and large good, so we can agree on that.

0:25:11.920 --> 0:25:14.640
<v Speaker 3>If there actually is evidence, I do want it revealed.

0:25:15.200 --> 0:25:18.720
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I will agree transparency is good, but I have

0:25:18.880 --> 0:25:22.960
<v Speaker 2>various anxiety written caveats to them.

0:25:23.520 --> 0:25:27.960
<v Speaker 3>Regarding your other point about this kind of legislation having

0:25:28.880 --> 0:25:32.880
<v Speaker 3>secondary effects about other types of quote intelligence like AI,

0:25:34.280 --> 0:25:38.200
<v Speaker 3>I mean, in one sense, I think, well, that's interesting,

0:25:38.280 --> 0:25:41.639
<v Speaker 3>and I appreciate those thoughts. Though I would also think, like,

0:25:43.040 --> 0:25:45.200
<v Speaker 3>if we're going to have a legislation like that, I

0:25:45.240 --> 0:25:48.000
<v Speaker 3>would prefer it to be like really targeted at that,

0:25:48.359 --> 0:25:51.320
<v Speaker 3>so that like there's no ambiguity in how the law

0:25:51.359 --> 0:25:55.439
<v Speaker 3>should be interpreted, Like you know, we should have very clear,

0:25:55.920 --> 0:26:00.359
<v Speaker 3>well thought out targeted regulations of the development of AI,

0:26:00.600 --> 0:26:02.960
<v Speaker 3>not trying to like use a law of meant for

0:26:03.040 --> 0:26:06.520
<v Speaker 3>something else to kind of like wiggle over into that

0:26:06.600 --> 0:26:08.520
<v Speaker 3>space too. Be my men.

0:26:09.160 --> 0:26:10.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, I see what you mean, Like we need

0:26:10.880 --> 0:26:12.920
<v Speaker 2>to have clear laws to deal with AI, and you

0:26:12.920 --> 0:26:17.120
<v Speaker 2>should have to have it all hinge on a broad

0:26:17.200 --> 0:26:19.240
<v Speaker 2>interpretation of a UFO Act.

0:26:20.640 --> 0:26:22.840
<v Speaker 3>But finally to come back to your original point and

0:26:23.720 --> 0:26:26.160
<v Speaker 3>again on the agreement. If the truth is out there,

0:26:26.240 --> 0:26:28.760
<v Speaker 3>I want it revealed. Yeah, bring it on.

0:26:29.520 --> 0:26:31.960
<v Speaker 2>All right. At this point, I think we have time

0:26:32.040 --> 0:26:37.160
<v Speaker 2>for just one listener mail from the Weird House Cinema category,

0:26:37.680 --> 0:26:39.320
<v Speaker 2>so I'm just gonna read it. I'm gonna read a

0:26:39.400 --> 0:26:41.240
<v Speaker 2>quick one here. This one comes to us from Adrian.

0:26:46.640 --> 0:26:49.240
<v Speaker 2>Adrian writes, Hey, guys, love the show. Just listen to

0:26:49.280 --> 0:26:52.320
<v Speaker 2>your episode on the Chronicles of Riddick. I love the

0:26:52.359 --> 0:26:55.240
<v Speaker 2>Riddick universe. I just wanted to ask how you mentioned

0:26:55.280 --> 0:26:58.639
<v Speaker 2>the actor column Fior and some of his movies, but

0:26:58.720 --> 0:27:01.080
<v Speaker 2>you didn't mention how he had a prominent role in

0:27:01.119 --> 0:27:03.680
<v Speaker 2>the movie Titus, which you mentioned in a Weird House

0:27:03.760 --> 0:27:06.440
<v Speaker 2>Cinema a couple of weeks ago. Sorry, I forget which episode.

0:27:06.680 --> 0:27:08.439
<v Speaker 2>After you brought up Titus, I found it on an

0:27:08.440 --> 0:27:11.640
<v Speaker 2>eBay and acquired it watched it three days ago. That

0:27:11.680 --> 0:27:14.200
<v Speaker 2>would be a great movie to feature on Weird House.

0:27:14.520 --> 0:27:16.879
<v Speaker 3>I haven't seen Titus in many years, but I remember

0:27:16.960 --> 0:27:20.119
<v Speaker 3>loving it. That's the one directed by Julie Taymoor that

0:27:20.280 --> 0:27:24.520
<v Speaker 3>has Anthony Hopkins as as the title character as Titus.

0:27:24.520 --> 0:27:27.320
<v Speaker 3>But that's also got a great cast all around. It's

0:27:27.359 --> 0:27:31.679
<v Speaker 3>got Jessica Lang, It's got Alan Cumming as the villain

0:27:31.760 --> 0:27:36.280
<v Speaker 3>as Emperor Saturnine. Uh yeah, it's it's a good one though.

0:27:36.320 --> 0:27:40.639
<v Speaker 3>It's it is uh, you know, weirdly. It's a weird

0:27:40.680 --> 0:27:42.879
<v Speaker 3>thing to caution about a Shakespeare play, but it is

0:27:43.000 --> 0:27:44.440
<v Speaker 3>incredibly violent.

0:27:45.400 --> 0:27:50.600
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, yeah, it's also interesting kind of a historical note.

0:27:51.359 --> 0:27:53.359
<v Speaker 2>The one of the co executive producers on it was

0:27:53.359 --> 0:27:54.040
<v Speaker 2>Steve Bannon.

0:27:54.760 --> 0:27:59.399
<v Speaker 3>What Yeah, Okay, that's odd.

0:27:59.480 --> 0:28:04.320
<v Speaker 2>But still yes, a very beautifully weirdly rendered film. I

0:28:05.080 --> 0:28:07.640
<v Speaker 2>hadn't been thinking about Titus specifically, but I have now

0:28:07.640 --> 0:28:11.119
<v Speaker 2>and again thought we should do a weird adaptation of

0:28:11.119 --> 0:28:14.679
<v Speaker 2>Shakespeare at some point or another. There are so many,

0:28:14.720 --> 0:28:16.520
<v Speaker 2>there's so many good ones, you know, there's so many

0:28:16.600 --> 0:28:19.639
<v Speaker 2>weird takes on Shakespeare. Some I like, some I don't like.

0:28:20.320 --> 0:28:22.160
<v Speaker 2>But there's always something worth talking about.

0:28:22.240 --> 0:28:23.960
<v Speaker 3>There I would be very into that.

0:28:24.560 --> 0:28:28.160
<v Speaker 2>So, Hey, shakespeare fans, let us know what your favorite

0:28:28.240 --> 0:28:31.440
<v Speaker 2>weird adaptations of Shakespeare are and we'll throw them in

0:28:31.480 --> 0:28:32.520
<v Speaker 2>the hat for consideration.

0:28:32.840 --> 0:28:35.600
<v Speaker 3>That's a great idea. I do like Shakespeare that has

0:28:36.640 --> 0:28:39.720
<v Speaker 3>kind of cheeky anachronisms in it, though from what I recall,

0:28:39.760 --> 0:28:44.600
<v Speaker 3>the anachronisms in Taymor's Titus are mainly in the framing narrative,

0:28:44.640 --> 0:28:47.960
<v Speaker 3>Like at the beginning, it's showing like a young child

0:28:48.040 --> 0:28:50.240
<v Speaker 3>sort of like playing with toy soldiers and stuff, and

0:28:50.280 --> 0:28:53.720
<v Speaker 3>this represents the battle that sets up the plot in

0:28:53.760 --> 0:28:56.560
<v Speaker 3>which you know, at the beginning of the story, Titus

0:28:56.680 --> 0:28:59.920
<v Speaker 3>is coming home victorious from a military campaign with prisoner

0:29:00.240 --> 0:29:03.640
<v Speaker 3>of war, including the Tamara, the queen of the Goths,

0:29:03.680 --> 0:29:07.680
<v Speaker 3>I think, and that's that's Jessica Lang's character. But after that,

0:29:07.800 --> 0:29:11.680
<v Speaker 3>while it is a very great looking and visually striking

0:29:12.120 --> 0:29:15.080
<v Speaker 3>kind of at least like textually weird movie, it is

0:29:15.160 --> 0:29:19.800
<v Speaker 3>mostly I think, set within an ancient Roman millieu. It

0:29:19.840 --> 0:29:22.680
<v Speaker 3>doesn't have weird technology running all around. There is another

0:29:22.760 --> 0:29:26.480
<v Speaker 3>Shakespeare adaptation that I do remember being anachronistic in a

0:29:26.520 --> 0:29:30.000
<v Speaker 3>way that I liked, which is the Oh, what's it

0:29:30.360 --> 0:29:34.080
<v Speaker 3>the Ian McKellen version of Richard the Third, where oh yes,

0:29:34.160 --> 0:29:37.920
<v Speaker 3>he plays Richard the Third and it's got Jim Broadbent

0:29:38.120 --> 0:29:38.800
<v Speaker 3>is Buckingham.

0:29:39.120 --> 0:29:42.320
<v Speaker 2>That's a really good one. Yeah. I was fond of

0:29:42.360 --> 0:29:43.440
<v Speaker 2>that one back in the day.

0:29:43.680 --> 0:29:45.640
<v Speaker 3>But it's set in like a World War One kind

0:29:45.640 --> 0:29:46.520
<v Speaker 3>of context.

0:29:47.160 --> 0:29:50.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, that was great. There are various adaptations of

0:29:51.000 --> 0:29:52.760
<v Speaker 2>Macbeth that I love. I mean, I love the old

0:29:52.800 --> 0:29:57.080
<v Speaker 2>seventy one Macbeth. I of course love a Curra Crissaw

0:29:57.240 --> 0:30:00.680
<v Speaker 2>was Thrown of Blood and even though the more recent one,

0:30:00.840 --> 0:30:04.400
<v Speaker 2>Joe Cohen's twenty twenty one adaptation, The Tragedy of McBath

0:30:04.520 --> 0:30:08.120
<v Speaker 2>is wonderful and has some tremendously weird choices in it.

0:30:08.440 --> 0:30:10.720
<v Speaker 3>I haven't seen that yet, I should have. I love

0:30:10.760 --> 0:30:13.560
<v Speaker 3>Francis McDorman, so yeah.

0:30:13.240 --> 0:30:17.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, she's great in it. Everybody's great. Wonderful cast, wonderful,

0:30:17.200 --> 0:30:20.040
<v Speaker 2>weird cast that one, because you also have you have

0:30:20.120 --> 0:30:23.320
<v Speaker 2>some expected names popping up, but then you also have

0:30:23.440 --> 0:30:26.280
<v Speaker 2>like Brian Thompson showing up as one of the murderers,

0:30:27.320 --> 0:30:29.720
<v Speaker 2>who many of you would remember from He's been in

0:30:29.720 --> 0:30:32.240
<v Speaker 2>a lot of b movies. He played Shao Khan in

0:30:32.280 --> 0:30:34.840
<v Speaker 2>one of the live action Mortal Kombat films, a big

0:30:34.880 --> 0:30:38.000
<v Speaker 2>muscle guy. He's not the kind of fella earlier on

0:30:38.320 --> 0:30:40.120
<v Speaker 2>in his career that you would have thought, Oh, this

0:30:40.160 --> 0:30:43.680
<v Speaker 2>guy's doing Shakespeare at some point. But he's a small role,

0:30:43.680 --> 0:30:44.320
<v Speaker 2>but he's great in it.

0:30:44.800 --> 0:30:49.000
<v Speaker 3>You weak, pathetic fools. Your souls are mine, I don't

0:30:49.000 --> 0:30:49.440
<v Speaker 3>think so.

0:30:50.320 --> 0:30:53.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. He was also one of the punks in The Terminator.

0:30:53.680 --> 0:30:55.000
<v Speaker 3>Okay, I gotta see that now.

0:30:55.480 --> 0:30:56.960
<v Speaker 2>All right, Well, we're gonna go and close up the

0:30:56.960 --> 0:30:59.040
<v Speaker 2>mail bag now, but yeah, right in, we'd love to

0:30:59.080 --> 0:31:01.080
<v Speaker 2>hear from him if you have thought. It's on past,

0:31:01.280 --> 0:31:05.080
<v Speaker 2>current and future episodes Stuff to Blow your Mind, Weird House, Cinema, Artifact,

0:31:05.160 --> 0:31:09.160
<v Speaker 2>Monster Fact, other episodes, a listener mail. It's all fair game. Yeah,

0:31:09.280 --> 0:31:11.080
<v Speaker 2>right in, we'd love to hear from you. Next listener

0:31:11.080 --> 0:31:13.720
<v Speaker 2>mail will occur on the next Monday in the cycle.

0:31:14.080 --> 0:31:17.480
<v Speaker 3>Huge thanks to our excellent audio producer JJ Posway. If

0:31:17.480 --> 0:31:19.120
<v Speaker 3>you would like to get in touch with us with

0:31:19.200 --> 0:31:21.800
<v Speaker 3>feedback on this episode or any other, to suggest a

0:31:21.880 --> 0:31:23.920
<v Speaker 3>topic for the future, or just to say hello, you

0:31:23.960 --> 0:31:26.560
<v Speaker 3>can email us at contact at stuff to Blow your

0:31:26.640 --> 0:31:34.800
<v Speaker 3>Mind dot com.

0:31:34.920 --> 0:31:37.840
<v Speaker 1>Stuff to Blow Your Mind is production of iHeartRadio for

0:31:37.960 --> 0:31:40.720
<v Speaker 1>more podcasts from my heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app,

0:31:40.880 --> 0:31:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Apple podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.