Speaker 1: All right, Leonard Skinner, simpleman. That can only mean one
Speaker 1: thing on this radio program. That's all things. Self proclaimed
Speaker 1: simple man. That means all things Bill O'Reilly, all things
Speaker 1: Bill O'Reilly or billoreilly dot com. Mister O'Reilly number one
Speaker 1: New York Times bestseller of the new book Confronting Evil
Speaker 1: and there is evil in the world.
Speaker 2: Mister O'Reilly, sir.
Speaker 3: How are you you? You are thrilled to know me?
Speaker 2: Right in some ways? Yeah, I mean twenty straight.
Speaker 1: Whenever we go to breakfast or lunch, and I pay
Speaker 1: for it every single time. But whatever I mean, I
Speaker 1: don't mind.
Speaker 3: You got more money than But I do want to
Speaker 3: say this sincerely. When you read a book of mine
Speaker 3: or probably anybody else's, and you tell your audience you
Speaker 3: like it, that's huge for the author. That's big because
Speaker 3: you got what four thousand radio stations.
Speaker 1: Here is something pretty close. We're up there, you know,
Speaker 1: it's amazing. Before we get into the topic that I
Speaker 1: want to discuss with you, which is the government shutdown.
Speaker 1: You know, there is a phenomenon back in the day
Speaker 1: when I started my talk radio career, believe it or not,
Speaker 1: nineteen eighty seven, mister O'Reilly.
Speaker 2: And I would.
Speaker 1: I would listen to other hosts and I would hear them,
Speaker 1: you know, let me give you the toll free telephone numbers.
Speaker 1: You know, they're the nine four one wwww, right, And
Speaker 1: they'd give out the phone number and they wouldn't get
Speaker 1: any calls. And we have one open line at eight
Speaker 1: hundred and nine four one wwww.
Speaker 2: You still have one open line, eight undred nine vote.
Speaker 1: And they get more incendiary and more incendiary and more incendiary,
Speaker 1: until finally they pissed somebody off one of the few
Speaker 1: listeners enough that somebody would call the show right right, right, Okay,
Speaker 1: So now we got everybody in their mother And I
Speaker 1: said this years ago, by the end of my career
Speaker 1: one day and I, well, it's not anytime soon. I
Speaker 1: hope that everybody's gonna have their own talk show. And
Speaker 1: I watch these people that have their podcasts, their quote,
Speaker 1: their media networks, they're this, they're that, and it's like
Speaker 1: they all crave and need a click, they need attention,
Speaker 1: So they get more incindiary, not for the purpose of
Speaker 1: espousing something they're passionate about or believe, but because they
Speaker 1: want to get noticed. Now you and I can make
Speaker 1: a headline in five seconds right now if we wanted to.
Speaker 2: But we don't do that.
Speaker 1: And I'm watching this game go on and I'm like,
Speaker 1: I'm laughing at it. I think it's funny because I
Speaker 1: don't think it's I don't think it is something that
Speaker 1: works in the long term. One thing both of us
Speaker 1: have in common is longevity in this business. And I
Speaker 1: don't think that gives you longevity.
Speaker 3: It also cheapens you, you know, And I made a
Speaker 3: few mistakes early in my career by you know, going
Speaker 3: after George Clooney maybe too hard or somebody like that
Speaker 3: that really didn't matter very much. But when you make
Speaker 3: it all personally.
Speaker 2: Well, well please stop here.
Speaker 1: You cannot go after that jackass, George Cloney hard enough,
Speaker 1: ra and him and his wife, their comments about bb
Speaker 1: nets and Yahoo were so over the top.
Speaker 3: Well, you can go after them, but you have to
Speaker 3: go after them on policy and on statements, not on
Speaker 3: personal And these people who do this on the podcast front,
Speaker 3: going after people personally, they're diminishing themselves and they will
Speaker 3: not be successful. Now I'm going to make a stunning
Speaker 3: transition into the story of the day. What you just
Speaker 3: described as far as podcasts and clicks and people trying
Speaker 3: to get attention on the internet is exactly what that
Speaker 3: Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer is doing, exactly the same thing.
Speaker 3: Humor knows that there's no way on earth that President
Speaker 3: Trump and the Republican Party are going to acquiesce to
Speaker 3: pay for the healthcare of illegal immigrants. He knows that
Speaker 3: every Democrat knows that, any more than IQ over fifty
Speaker 3: knows that. Yet he walks into the White House.
Speaker 1: By the way, Bill, do you think I have an
Speaker 1: IQ of over fifty? I've never had a test.
Speaker 3: You got four thousand radio stations. You don't need an IQ.
Speaker 2: I'm kidding. Keep going, all right.
Speaker 3: So Humor knows, he walks in, and he knows that
Speaker 3: this is never going to happen, yet he does it anyway.
Speaker 3: So what does that tell you? It tells you didn't
Speaker 3: want a deal. He wanted to shut the government down.
Speaker 3: It's exactly what happened. Now, you then advanced the story
Speaker 3: why why would the Democratic Party want to shut down?
Speaker 3: There's a number of articles about one in the Washington
Speaker 3: Post today saying, Oh, this is going to hurt the
Speaker 3: Democratic Party, this is going to do this, This is
Speaker 3: going to do that. That's not true. The Democratic Party
Speaker 3: is at it's low ebb. It has nothing. It's losing
Speaker 3: on every single front except for the radical left urban centers,
Speaker 3: all right. And so Schumer is trying to get negative
Speaker 3: attention by the government shutdown by saying no, no, no, no,
Speaker 3: it's all Trump's fault because he knows that people don't
Speaker 3: pay attention. They don't really know what the big issue
Speaker 3: is here. All they know is that the services are
Speaker 3: being shut down. Some people are panicking, Oh, I won't
Speaker 3: get this or I won't get that, and that's what
Speaker 3: the Democrats want. Now. You and I have been around
Speaker 3: long enough to know that this shutdown is going to
Speaker 3: get solved, all right. It always does, and they'll come
Speaker 3: to some kind of compromise which will not include healthcare
Speaker 3: payments for illegal migrants. It will not. But this was
Speaker 3: by design. The leadership of the Democratic Party wanted to
Speaker 3: go in, wanted to shut it down, and are hoping
Speaker 3: that this will reignite some kind of support for the party.
Speaker 3: So that is a simple man's analysis.
Speaker 1: It's even deeper. I mean, I play this montage I'm
Speaker 1: going to play for you. I don't know if you've
Speaker 1: heard it. Interestingly, the Speaker of the House, Mike Johnson,
Speaker 1: put it on a loop on a TV outside of
Speaker 1: his office in the Halls of Congress, which I find hilarious.
Speaker 1: And this is the Democrats in past years talking about
Speaker 1: how horrible government shutdowns are, and this is the Schumer shutdown.
Speaker 2: Listen, it is not.
Speaker 4: Normal to shut down the government, but we don't get
Speaker 4: what we want. If the government shuts down, it will
Speaker 4: be at Americans who suffer most. A government shutdown means
Speaker 4: seniors who rely on Social Security could be thrown into chaos.
Speaker 2: Families will be hurt, Farmers will be hurt.
Speaker 4: It's the service members who will work without a paycheck.
Speaker 4: It's the firefighters who will be furlough the shutdown. You
Speaker 4: know who's gonna feel the pain.
Speaker 3: You know who it hurts you, everyday people and the
Speaker 3: most vulnerable.
Speaker 2: Seniors, veterans, working, families, hungary, kids off.
Speaker 5: Democrats are signalings that they're ready for a fight this time,
Speaker 5: Stumor tells the Associated Press.
Speaker 4: Both things have changed.
Speaker 2: It is not normal to shut down the government when
Speaker 2: we don't get.
Speaker 3: What we want.
Speaker 1: Now, you got to admit that's damn good and amusing
Speaker 1: as hell.
Speaker 3: Yeah, sure, I mean, I'm not sure it furthers the debate, because.
Speaker 1: The Democrats further the debate. It shows what raging hypocrites
Speaker 1: they are.
Speaker 3: All right, but you can make a case that almost
Speaker 3: every politician has ever lived as a hypocrit. But what
Speaker 3: this reflects is desperation. And Schumer's got a personal agenda
Speaker 3: here too. He's at the end of the line, Schumer,
Speaker 3: and he's absolutely desperate not to get primaried by Cortes,
Speaker 3: all right, because she could beat him in New York.
Speaker 1: See them, She will kill him, she will destroy him,
Speaker 1: and he will get wiped out and embarrassed. Okay, your
Speaker 1: state of New York, by the way, is going You're
Speaker 1: not doing a good job. By the way, I'm blaming
Speaker 1: you for the decline of New York.
Speaker 2: You're bill O'Reilly. You live in New York.
Speaker 1: You should be doing a better job of managing your state.
Speaker 1: My free state of Florida is doing much much better.
Speaker 3: By the way, let me reply to that, my home field,
Speaker 3: Nasau and Suffolk County has followed my lead.
Speaker 1: No, you can't bifurcate out the state and say, well,
Speaker 1: what I live in particular is fine, but the rest
Speaker 1: of New York sucks and and and take no responsibility
Speaker 1: on your shoulders.
Speaker 2: I'm not letting you off the hook, all right.
Speaker 3: I'm telling you that we're trending blue.
Speaker 2: And now there's Bruce Blakeman is great. I love Bruce Blakeman.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I mean, I can't do anything about New York
Speaker 3: City because I don't live in New York City.
Speaker 2: You're copying out.
Speaker 1: Your entire state is a woke you know, it's in
Speaker 1: a woke state of insanity and madness and you haven't
Speaker 1: fixed it.
Speaker 2: Bill, that's your home turf. Uh.
Speaker 3: Stefanic is gonna beat Hogel next year, so you're gonna
Speaker 3: eat your words.
Speaker 1: Listen, nobody would be happier if if, in fact Stefanic
Speaker 1: could win that race.
Speaker 2: I'd be very happy.
Speaker 1: He's gonna problem is too many, too many smart people
Speaker 1: like me have said goodbye.
Speaker 3: Well, yeah, I mean, look at California. My god, that's
Speaker 3: worse than New York. A million and a half are gone.
Speaker 3: But anyway, I'm doing the best I can do here,
Speaker 3: and I'm making progress on my home field, and I'm
Speaker 3: not taking credit for it. Of course, you get very
Speaker 3: fine people here, but New York City dominates the state.
Speaker 3: And that is got to blow up, and it will
Speaker 3: if Man Donnie is elected, it will absolutely blow up.
Speaker 3: And then you'll see the fire storm. And that's really
Speaker 3: the only way that the state is ever going to change,
Speaker 3: and the body count is going to be horrific.
Speaker 2: Pick break right.
Speaker 1: Back more with all Things simple Man, Bill O'Reilly all
Speaker 1: Things O'Reilly of Bill O'Reilly dot com, and later Senator
Speaker 1: Haggarty of Tennessee will join us as well. We'll get
Speaker 1: the latest in Washington and much more as our coverage continues.
Speaker 3: Sean Hannity show a thermonuclear mma assault on Baby News.
Speaker 3: Hannity is on right now.
Speaker 1: All right, we continue now with all things self proclaimed
Speaker 1: simple man. That means all things Bill O'Reilly, all things
Speaker 1: O'Reilly or billoreilly dot com.
Speaker 3: Did you see what he said in the press conference yesterday,
Speaker 3: Man Donnie, He's gonna.
Speaker 2: Watch him every day. I mean, he's great material.
Speaker 3: But this is the worst. He wants to take the
Speaker 3: authority away from the New York City Police Commissioner discipline
Speaker 3: officers and give it to civilians. That means that there
Speaker 3: isn't going to be any police. They're all gone. You
Speaker 3: can't work under a system like that, which is what
Speaker 3: he wants. He hates the police calls him races. He's
Speaker 3: going to cut a bill.
Speaker 1: He wants to open up the prisons and let all
Speaker 1: the convicts out. He wants to take felonies and turn
Speaker 1: them into you know, misdemeanors, which guarantees that these you know,
Speaker 1: career criminals will be on the street. I mean, it's
Speaker 1: a disaster in the making. I mean you can see,
Speaker 1: you know, two trains heading towards each other on the
Speaker 1: track and it's going to go. They're going to crash.
Speaker 1: Your state is going to crash. And you're gonna call
Speaker 1: me and you're gonna say, Hannity, your buddy, O'Reilly, I
Speaker 1: need I need a place to stay, and can you
Speaker 1: take me in? And I'm going to say yes, I
Speaker 1: will tell you ahead of time, I will accept you.
Speaker 3: The important thing for your listeners to understand is that
Speaker 3: all of this uh government shut down, hate Trump, all
Speaker 3: of this stuff, lawsuits, lawsuits, lawsuits. It's all out of
Speaker 3: desperation because the progressive left is losing badly and they
Speaker 3: know it. So it's like you know, the Hail Mary
Speaker 3: Pass or whatever cliche you want to use. They are
Speaker 3: going to do irrational things to try to write the ship.
Speaker 3: But it's not going to work, because probably will.
Speaker 1: The one thing that not even considering is a re examination, introspection,
Speaker 1: self reflection, of course, correction in terms of their policies
Speaker 1: that are out of sync with the American people. That
Speaker 1: would be the answer for them, and they just that
Speaker 1: that's not even part of the process.
Speaker 3: Because the mindset of the progressives is that we are noble,
Speaker 3: We are the good people and the maga trump of
Speaker 3: the evil people, and we're not gonna We're not going
Speaker 3: to walk away from our nobility. These are fanatics, These
Speaker 3: are people who you know, you point out the fact
Speaker 3: that the fact Phitsker is the best example, and this
Speaker 3: is the most vivid example I could ever give any American.
Speaker 3: Here's a man who's been in office almost eight years,
Speaker 3: I think, and there have been literally thousands of poor
Speaker 3: African Americans killed in Chicago, murdered by drug gangs. He
Speaker 3: has done nothing to mitigate that now one thing yet
Speaker 3: offered a blanket of protection by the federal government to
Speaker 3: bring this murder rate down so that poor African Americans
Speaker 3: are not shot dead. He not only says no, I
Speaker 3: don't want the extra protection. But the people that are
Speaker 3: offering in, including the President, are racists. I mean, how
Speaker 3: irrational and hateful and destructive is that point of view.
Speaker 3: That's the best example I can get of anybody.
Speaker 2: Mister O'Reilly. We appreciate your.
Speaker 3: Time, sir, Thanks very much, John, I really appreciate you.
Speaker 3: Reading the book means a lot.
Speaker 1: By the way, you do need a simply save home
Speaker 1: security system, you especially, do you know that. All right,
Speaker 1: let's go to Chucky Schumer. This is the Schumer shutdown,
Speaker 1: and it's getting interesting, and this is Schumer attacking the
Speaker 1: New York Times. This was maybe the funniest moment I've
Speaker 1: ever seen on the center floor of my lifetime.
Speaker 4: Now, when I know the leader is going to show
Speaker 4: a poll that says that Democrats will be blamed for
Speaker 4: the shutdown, there are many more polls that show Republicans
Speaker 4: are blamed. The question in that poll is biased, biased
Speaker 4: in the New York Times, but it's biased if you
Speaker 4: turned the question.
Speaker 2: That's true.
Speaker 4: I don't always believe the New York Times.
Speaker 1: You can be sure of that, even you know, all
Speaker 1: good humor is rooted in the truth. I mean, for
Speaker 1: Shumer to claim that the New York Times is biased
Speaker 1: against Democrats. Is beyond laughable. But he tried to make
Speaker 1: that case. Now, let's take a trip down memory lane
Speaker 1: and let's play Chucky Schumer against government shutdowns over the years.
Speaker 4: It's sort of like this, someone goes into your house,
Speaker 4: takes your wife and children hostage, and then says, let's
Speaker 4: negotiate over the price of your house. You know, we
Speaker 4: could do the same thing on immigration. We could we
Speaker 4: believe strongly in immigration reform. We could say we're shutting
Speaker 4: down the government. We're not going to raise the debt
Speaker 4: ceiling until you pass immigration reform. It would be governmental chaos.
Speaker 4: And what if I persuaded my cause to say I'm
Speaker 4: going to shut the government down, I am going to
Speaker 4: not pay our bills unless.
Speaker 2: I get my way.
Speaker 4: It's a politics of idiocy, of confrontation, of paralysis. We're
Speaker 4: now only a week away from a government shutdown, which,
Speaker 4: to remind my colleagues, could cost our economy thousands of
Speaker 4: jobs and billions of dollars, as it did in twenty thirteen.
Speaker 4: I think a government shutdown is something we desperately want
Speaker 4: to avoid, all of us. I don't know if they
Speaker 4: can pass the three week bill. We would much prefer
Speaker 4: they do a full funding bill, but we're not going
Speaker 4: to shut the government down. Senator McConnell wanted me to
Speaker 4: negotiate the wall with President Trump. I said to him
Speaker 4: two things.
Speaker 2: First, it's not a.
Speaker 4: Negotiation, no wall. And second, I said, only you can
Speaker 4: persuade him that he shouldn't do the wall because it'll
Speaker 4: cause a government shutdown. The White House has done nothing
Speaker 4: but so chaos and confusion, division and disarray, and it
Speaker 4: may just lead to a government shutdown that no one
Speaker 4: wants that all of us here have been striving to avoid.
Speaker 4: And we do not want to let a Trump temper
Speaker 4: tantrum govern our policies or cause the shutdown of a
Speaker 4: government which everyone on both sides of the aisles knows
Speaker 4: is the wrong idea. Speaker McCarthy needs to stop letting
Speaker 4: the MAGA radicals drive his decisions and do the obvious
Speaker 4: and sensible thing, follow the Senate's lead and pass a
Speaker 4: bipartisan CR to prevent this reckless shutdown. CR means continue
Speaker 4: the government spending a shutdown. The alternative is cut off
Speaker 4: the government spending. And here's what we would what would
Speaker 4: happen if we cut off government spending. It would be
Speaker 4: devastation like we have never seen. We're saying now much.
Speaker 1: And now we find ourselves in the midst of the
Speaker 1: Schumer shutdown. Now, what changed? The only thing that has
Speaker 1: changed and changed dramatically is the radicalization of the Democratic Party.
Speaker 1: Chuck Schumer, like Hakem. Jeffries, is leader in name only.
Speaker 1: He's not a leader. He doesn't have control of his caucus,
Speaker 1: and he is scared to death of the radicals that
Speaker 1: dominate his party and that they are insisting that the
Speaker 1: government shut down. So everything he's ever stood for, every
Speaker 1: position he's ever taken as it relates to government shutdowns,
Speaker 1: is now turned upside down on its head. And it
Speaker 1: just reeks of nothing but Schumer hypocrisy because he's got
Speaker 1: to give in to the radicals and his party and
Speaker 1: he's got to do what they tell him to do.
Speaker 1: Otherwise he's so desperate he still wants to cling to
Speaker 1: his personal, blind political ambition that will transcend any desire
Speaker 1: to simply do what he believes is right.
Speaker 2: And that's the difference. That's what has changed. Now.
Speaker 1: Our friend Senator Haggerty, who we like a lot on
Speaker 1: this program, put out an ex post and said Republicans
Speaker 1: are committed to keeping the government open with a clean,
Speaker 1: r short term funding bill, radical left Democrats and an
Speaker 1: a tempt to get a ridiculous Democrats now are asking
Speaker 1: for one point five trillion dollars for a seven week
Speaker 1: continuing resolution one point five trillion and a wish list
Speaker 1: of liberal priorities, and they've now shut down the government.
Speaker 1: That's why it's the Schumer shutdown.
Speaker 3: Now.
Speaker 1: As far as I'm concerned, I don't care how long
Speaker 1: it goes on. I feel sorry for the people that
Speaker 1: won't get their paychecks that probably won't happen till mid October.
Speaker 1: I would expect this is going to extend out, probably
Speaker 1: until then, that's my best guess. And I think Democrats
Speaker 1: are just you know, they've they've now they've now cornered
Speaker 1: themselves and getting out of this hole they've dug is
Speaker 1: going to be nearly impossible.
Speaker 2: Uh. And this may go on for a while.
Speaker 1: But if they think they get one point five trillion
Speaker 1: dollars for the insane policies that they're demanding out of
Speaker 1: Donald Trump, they don't know Donald Trump, nor do they
Speaker 1: know the Republican Caucus. Right now, it's not going to
Speaker 1: happen anyway. Senator Bill Haggerty of Tennessee joins us, sir,
Speaker 1: how are you welcome back?
Speaker 2: Glad to have you.
Speaker 5: I'm great, Seawan, It's good to be back with you
Speaker 5: as well. An interesting time. Indeed, you did a wonderful job.
Speaker 5: That collage or trux humor statements was just fascinating. And
Speaker 5: to hear him but they play victim to the New
Speaker 5: York Times bias, that was just.
Speaker 1: Too rich to That was maybe one of the best
Speaker 1: moments I've ever seen on the Center floor.
Speaker 5: I was on the floor when it happened. We all
Speaker 5: just just cracked up to hear him say that.
Speaker 1: But it gets back to, by the way, when even
Speaker 1: when he started laughing because he knows it's complete bs true.
Speaker 5: It's so true. He was laughing as well. You're exactly right.
Speaker 1: All right, let's talk about how we got here, what
Speaker 1: they're demanding, and why it's not going to happen, and
Speaker 1: how this gets resolved eventually.
Speaker 5: You know, I think you hit the nail on the head.
Speaker 5: Their party has changed dramatically. I would just add one
Speaker 5: more thing to it. The party certainly is being run
Speaker 5: by the radicals, and the radical left and the Democratic side.
Speaker 5: But the elect dynamics in New York State have also changed,
Speaker 5: and if you look at the polling, you've got a
Speaker 5: situation where Chuck Schumer would be defeated today by AOC.
Speaker 5: We're a primary election to be held. What Chuck Schumer
Speaker 5: is trying to do, and I think this is the
Speaker 5: root of the hypocracy, is he views this as a
Speaker 5: test of his political manhood and if he doesn't step up,
Speaker 5: he allows if he doesn't shut the government down, I
Speaker 5: should say, then he's going to allow AOC. And the
Speaker 5: radical left claim that he's taken a knee to Trump,
Speaker 5: he's bowing to Trump, he's caving to Trump. That's the
Speaker 5: argument that he's trying to avoid, and he's paining himself
Speaker 5: into a corner in the process. So they found themselves
Speaker 5: in an impossible situation. This is certainly not helping anybody.
Speaker 5: You heard him go through all the reasons not to
Speaker 5: shut the government down, Yet here we are, because this
Speaker 5: is political theater, just so Chuck Schumer again can demonstrate
Speaker 5: his political manhood to the far far left.
Speaker 3: Of his party.
Speaker 1: Well, I don't really see how they get out of this,
Speaker 1: except that at some point they're going to have to capitulate.
Speaker 1: The reason I think it goes on through mid mid October.
Speaker 1: Correct me if I'm wrong, is that the payments to
Speaker 1: the military of other government employees, uh, that will that money,
Speaker 1: those moneys will go out forthwith and then the next
Speaker 1: the first payment that they miss will be in mid October.
Speaker 2: Is that about the right timing.
Speaker 5: I think that's that's certainly what I would put an
Speaker 5: outer boundary on this Sean. I think that's that's exactly
Speaker 5: the right way to think about it. But there's going
Speaker 5: to be more intermediate pain. I think the issue here
Speaker 5: is that Chuck Schumer is also precipitating the acceleration of
Speaker 5: a much needed reduction in force of the federal government.
Speaker 5: President Trump has been limited by lawsuits and by HR rules.
Speaker 5: Those limitations go away in the shutdown. President Trump has
Speaker 5: much more power to terminate programs the taxpayer should be funding,
Speaker 5: to eliminate jobs that shouldn't be paid for, and that
Speaker 5: precipitation is the result of Chuck's humors. Moved last night
Speaker 5: to shut the government down. Russ Votas instructed the departments
Speaker 5: and agencies to go ahead and have their list ready
Speaker 5: and to start pulling the trigger. So I think what
Speaker 5: you're going to start seeing is programs terminated, positions terminated
Speaker 5: that aren't relevant anymore, and that's going to have the effect
Speaker 5: of dramatically accelerating the reduction and size of government the
Speaker 5: President Trump ran on. So President Trump wins either way,
Speaker 5: is a brilliant negotiator. This is where we are, and
Speaker 5: Chuck Schumer loses either way.
Speaker 1: What you're saying is is that this now opens the
Speaker 1: door in many ways to DOSEE two point zero and
Speaker 1: provides the president with an opportunity to eliminate unnecessary bureaucracy
Speaker 1: in Washington.
Speaker 5: Then go, you nailed it. That's exactly what's going to
Speaker 5: happen as well. And Chuck Schumer holds himself out as
Speaker 5: the defender of the bureaucracy, but he's the one that
Speaker 5: actually unleashed the knife.
Speaker 1: Well, I mean, that's not necessarily the worst thing in
Speaker 1: the world. Do you have a timetable on this. I mean,
Speaker 1: you're in the cloak room, You're talking to Democratic senators.
Speaker 2: What are they saying to you?
Speaker 5: Well, I think there's a lot of frustration on the
Speaker 5: Democrats side that they see Chuck doing this. I think
Speaker 5: they realize that it's suicidal, but it has a lot
Speaker 5: more to do, I think with New York state politics,
Speaker 5: with his concerns about AOC potentially primary him, and as
Speaker 5: I said earlier, were that race to happen today, AOC
Speaker 5: would beat him. That's where the radical left has moved
Speaker 5: that whole party, and as you said, that Democrat party
Speaker 5: has changed. This is a reflection of that. But trying
Speaker 5: to hold the nation hostage the way Chuck Schumer is
Speaker 5: doing this right now is not going to work. The
Speaker 5: ridiculous request a trillion, a trillion and a half dollars
Speaker 5: keep the government open for seven weeks while we go
Speaker 5: through the appropriations process. It's absolutely insane. So this sort
Speaker 5: of blackmail will not work as a dead infratrumer, and
Speaker 5: we'll see how long you last.
Speaker 1: All right, Senator Bill Haggerty of Tennessee. We appreciate your time, sir,
Speaker 1: as always, thank you for being with us.
Speaker 5: Thank you, Sean always ready to be with you. Thanks.
Speaker 1: Eight hundred and nine four one, Shawn is a number
Speaker 1: you want to be a part of the program. We'll
Speaker 1: get to your calls coming up momentarily. I want to
Speaker 1: remind you about a way to communicate that let me
Speaker 1: tell you something is reliable, more reliable than any cell
Speaker 1: phone service. And the beauty is you don't pay any
Speaker 1: monthly subscription at all whatsoever. Remember as a kid, we
Speaker 1: all love walkie talkies. They were fun, they were fun
Speaker 1: to play with. Imagine industrial strength walkie talkies that are
Speaker 1: on a nationwide lt network that allows you to communicate
Speaker 1: with job sites. You know those job sites get louder.
Speaker 1: You don't have cell service. You need to stay in
Speaker 1: touch with your team. You need a line of communications
Speaker 1: that won't quit. That's what rapid radios will give you.
Speaker 1: It'll keep your crew. We do use it here on
Speaker 1: the Hannity Show, Connected and crews on construction sites and
Speaker 1: warehouses across campus grounds. No delays, you get Chris reliable talk.
Speaker 1: With the push of a button. You have a group chats,
Speaker 1: private calls, a battery life that goes on for days
Speaker 1: and days. Whether you're the foremant of security to field
Speaker 1: staff that you need to be in touch with Rapid radios.
Speaker 1: We'll get the job done, fast response, one touch connection,
Speaker 1: and it's built for work. You just press talk, no
Speaker 1: monthly fee, nationwide LTE network. They're durable, they're preprogrammed, They're
Speaker 1: built for moments when connection really really matters. It's great
Speaker 1: to stay in touch with elderly relatives, your children, and
Speaker 1: you'll love this technology. You'll be glad you had it,
Speaker 1: and you'll save money over time. Just go to rapid
Speaker 1: radios dot com today, stay close, stay connected, and it
Speaker 1: should be easy and with rapid Radios it is. Rapid
Speaker 1: radios dot com today.
Speaker 3: Up next our final roundup and information Overload hours