WEBVTT - Is social media driving us insane?

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:03.360
<v Speaker 1>Want to position yourself for career success, master the Fundamentals

0:00:03.360 --> 0:00:06.680
<v Speaker 1>of Business with hb X Core, a three course online

0:00:06.720 --> 0:00:10.720
<v Speaker 1>program developed by Harvard Business School faculty. Immerse yourself in

0:00:10.840 --> 0:00:13.920
<v Speaker 1>real world case studies as you dive into business analytics,

0:00:13.960 --> 0:00:17.079
<v Speaker 1>economics for managers, and financial accounting. The three courses that

0:00:17.200 --> 0:00:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Harvard Business School faculty determined were essential to becoming fluent

0:00:20.920 --> 0:00:24.680
<v Speaker 1>in the languages of business. Boost your resume, grow your network,

0:00:24.720 --> 0:00:27.360
<v Speaker 1>and advance your career with the hb X Core credential

0:00:27.520 --> 0:00:30.160
<v Speaker 1>from hb X and Harvard Business School. To learn more,

0:00:30.240 --> 0:00:33.760
<v Speaker 1>visit about hb X dot com slash how Stuff Works.

0:00:34.200 --> 0:00:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Are you looking for brand new episodes of a short

0:00:36.600 --> 0:00:40.319
<v Speaker 1>how Stuff Works podcast that explains the everyday world around us,

0:00:40.560 --> 0:00:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Then check out brain Stuff with me Christian Sager. New

0:00:44.120 --> 0:00:48.320
<v Speaker 1>episodes hit every Monday and Wednesday on iTunes, Google Play, Spotify,

0:00:48.560 --> 0:00:55.840
<v Speaker 1>or anywhere else you get your podcasts. Welcome to Stuff

0:00:55.880 --> 0:01:05.280
<v Speaker 1>to Blow Your Mind from how Stuff Works dot com. Hey,

0:01:05.360 --> 0:01:07.000
<v Speaker 1>welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind. My name is

0:01:07.080 --> 0:01:10.679
<v Speaker 1>Robert Lamp and my name is Christian Seger. So we're

0:01:10.720 --> 0:01:14.360
<v Speaker 1>recording this a week after the election here in the

0:01:14.440 --> 0:01:19.240
<v Speaker 1>United States. Uh, and we're kind of reeling not just

0:01:19.360 --> 0:01:23.640
<v Speaker 1>from the election, but from the social media reverberations around it.

0:01:24.160 --> 0:01:25.960
<v Speaker 1>And so Robert and I were talking about it, and

0:01:26.000 --> 0:01:28.800
<v Speaker 1>we said, you know, there's a lot of research. We

0:01:28.840 --> 0:01:32.000
<v Speaker 1>see a lot of research fly across our screens about

0:01:32.480 --> 0:01:36.640
<v Speaker 1>mental health and social media. Let's do a dive and

0:01:36.760 --> 0:01:40.039
<v Speaker 1>figure out what we know so far about this, because

0:01:40.080 --> 0:01:43.000
<v Speaker 1>it seems like a topic at least from my social

0:01:43.000 --> 0:01:46.360
<v Speaker 1>media feeds, that people are interested in right now. Yeah,

0:01:46.440 --> 0:01:49.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's there's absolutely no escaping it, um, because

0:01:49.320 --> 0:01:51.680
<v Speaker 1>here we are at the the tail end of s

0:01:52.240 --> 0:01:54.960
<v Speaker 1>and uh, you know, just looking back on it, taking

0:01:55.000 --> 0:01:57.360
<v Speaker 1>into account everything that sort of happened with social media.

0:01:57.440 --> 0:02:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Let's say we had billions of tweets and Facebook status

0:02:01.040 --> 0:02:04.760
<v Speaker 1>updates about the US election as they were happening. Yeah. No,

0:02:05.200 --> 0:02:09.079
<v Speaker 1>I don't know about you, but like everything, I'm seeing everything.

0:02:09.320 --> 0:02:11.000
<v Speaker 1>But I'd say a good fifty percent of the people

0:02:11.000 --> 0:02:13.080
<v Speaker 1>in my feet are saying, like, sorry, I've got to

0:02:13.080 --> 0:02:16.000
<v Speaker 1>take a step away from this. On top of this, uh,

0:02:16.680 --> 0:02:20.519
<v Speaker 1>political activity and political inactivity. Um, you also have seen,

0:02:20.600 --> 0:02:24.720
<v Speaker 1>of course, a lot of slanted and misinformed articles that

0:02:24.800 --> 0:02:26.919
<v Speaker 1>have made the rounds, and that is something that is

0:02:26.960 --> 0:02:29.960
<v Speaker 1>being covered in the media currently, How does uh, how

0:02:30.000 --> 0:02:34.440
<v Speaker 1>does Facebook? How does Google as um uh as a

0:02:34.440 --> 0:02:36.720
<v Speaker 1>as a as a manager of these different properties, as

0:02:36.760 --> 0:02:40.320
<v Speaker 1>a curative of these properties, how does how do they

0:02:40.360 --> 0:02:45.240
<v Speaker 1>factor into this equation? Um? You know, and and of

0:02:45.240 --> 0:02:47.760
<v Speaker 1>course on top of that, we also had a really good,

0:02:47.800 --> 0:02:50.839
<v Speaker 1>in a really depressing season of black Mirror. Just put

0:02:50.840 --> 0:02:54.480
<v Speaker 1>it all in the perspective. But but you know, we

0:02:54.480 --> 0:02:56.720
<v Speaker 1>we have to we come back to looking at social

0:02:56.760 --> 0:02:59.480
<v Speaker 1>media and what its role is this thing that we've created,

0:02:59.520 --> 0:03:02.919
<v Speaker 1>this thing that we use every every day. So how

0:03:03.000 --> 0:03:05.720
<v Speaker 1>much of what we're feeling now? And uh and and

0:03:05.880 --> 0:03:09.959
<v Speaker 1>these um, these opinions, these these emotions that are being expressed.

0:03:10.000 --> 0:03:13.120
<v Speaker 1>How much of that can we blame on social media itself?

0:03:13.280 --> 0:03:16.240
<v Speaker 1>How much of it is just what people have always felt? Uh?

0:03:16.320 --> 0:03:19.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's just the immediate concern is always more pressing,

0:03:19.360 --> 0:03:22.480
<v Speaker 1>more real, there's always more fire to it. So and

0:03:22.760 --> 0:03:24.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, are we just are are we just blowing

0:03:24.560 --> 0:03:28.600
<v Speaker 1>everything out of out of proportion and simply looking for

0:03:28.600 --> 0:03:32.160
<v Speaker 1>forces to blame? Yeah? I think, uh, well, we're gonna

0:03:32.320 --> 0:03:34.600
<v Speaker 1>really get into it with the research today. But I

0:03:34.760 --> 0:03:36.520
<v Speaker 1>just like to say that I think that there's a

0:03:36.520 --> 0:03:40.960
<v Speaker 1>certain amount of technological determinism that goes along with the

0:03:41.000 --> 0:03:45.560
<v Speaker 1>idea that it's social media's fault quote unquote. UM. And

0:03:45.680 --> 0:03:48.040
<v Speaker 1>from the research, the big lesson that I learned, and

0:03:48.080 --> 0:03:51.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe you know at the end we'll revisit this is

0:03:51.320 --> 0:03:54.520
<v Speaker 1>that it's not the medium, it's how we approach the

0:03:54.560 --> 0:03:59.080
<v Speaker 1>medium and what we bring to it. Um. And before

0:03:59.080 --> 0:04:00.920
<v Speaker 1>we start, I think, I think, like I just want

0:04:00.920 --> 0:04:02.960
<v Speaker 1>to share a little bit with the audience. I have

0:04:03.600 --> 0:04:07.680
<v Speaker 1>personal social media policies already in place. I've talked about

0:04:07.720 --> 0:04:10.200
<v Speaker 1>these on other shows before. I probably talked about them

0:04:10.200 --> 0:04:14.760
<v Speaker 1>on here before. Um, this one's a little weird. I

0:04:14.960 --> 0:04:19.839
<v Speaker 1>only read Facebook, my Facebook personal stream if I'm in

0:04:19.839 --> 0:04:24.120
<v Speaker 1>a bathroom. Yeah, I that's my My policy is, I

0:04:24.200 --> 0:04:26.799
<v Speaker 1>don't want to read it at my desk. I don't

0:04:26.800 --> 0:04:28.599
<v Speaker 1>want to read it if I'm in my living room

0:04:28.640 --> 0:04:32.559
<v Speaker 1>or my bedroom, or if I'm on bus whatever. Uh,

0:04:32.600 --> 0:04:37.760
<v Speaker 1>it stays in the bathroom and and whatever it brings

0:04:37.839 --> 0:04:41.160
<v Speaker 1>up for me, if it's anger or sadness or frustration

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:45.960
<v Speaker 1>or even happiness or whatever, I keep it there. Um.

0:04:46.120 --> 0:04:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Now that's for personal stuff. We always advocate at the

0:04:50.120 --> 0:04:53.040
<v Speaker 1>end of every episode. Hey, visit us on social media

0:04:53.320 --> 0:04:56.120
<v Speaker 1>My job is to look at social media for stuff

0:04:56.160 --> 0:04:57.800
<v Speaker 1>to blow your mind and how stuff works in our

0:04:57.800 --> 0:05:00.640
<v Speaker 1>other brands. Yeah. I wish I could step away from Facebook, really,

0:05:00.680 --> 0:05:03.720
<v Speaker 1>but it's this thing I gotta do every morning. Yeah. Yeah,

0:05:04.839 --> 0:05:09.680
<v Speaker 1>And I curate all my feeds, meaning for both Twitter

0:05:09.720 --> 0:05:13.560
<v Speaker 1>and Facebook. So on Facebook, if i'm quote friends with

0:05:13.640 --> 0:05:17.840
<v Speaker 1>a person and they're posting things that upset me, then

0:05:17.880 --> 0:05:20.640
<v Speaker 1>I'll do the I forget what the terminology is hide

0:05:21.040 --> 0:05:24.120
<v Speaker 1>or uh. I basically make it so I can't see

0:05:24.120 --> 0:05:26.000
<v Speaker 1>their stuff, but I don't say to them I hate you,

0:05:26.279 --> 0:05:28.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to be friends. And there's there's unfollowing,

0:05:29.000 --> 0:05:32.840
<v Speaker 1>there's there's fighting, there's requestion to see the less of somebody.

0:05:32.960 --> 0:05:35.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's the That's the thing is that everyone engages.

0:05:35.800 --> 0:05:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Unless you're just like a rare and novice user of

0:05:39.880 --> 0:05:42.279
<v Speaker 1>say Facebook or Twitter or what have you. There's always

0:05:42.320 --> 0:05:44.800
<v Speaker 1>a certain amount of curation. You're choosing who to follow,

0:05:45.080 --> 0:05:48.560
<v Speaker 1>then you're choosing who to unfollow or hide. The algorithm

0:05:48.560 --> 0:05:52.360
<v Speaker 1>on Facebook is U is accounting for your preferences and

0:05:52.480 --> 0:05:57.000
<v Speaker 1>you're getting this custom stream of information and uh. On Twitter,

0:05:57.320 --> 0:06:00.080
<v Speaker 1>I make use of lists tremendously. I mean, and I

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:04.000
<v Speaker 1>think I probably follow six hundred people on Twitter, and

0:06:04.080 --> 0:06:07.120
<v Speaker 1>I actually follow less than a hundred people on Twitter

0:06:07.360 --> 0:06:09.640
<v Speaker 1>because I have a list of what I actually look at.

0:06:09.960 --> 0:06:12.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, I don't want to offend people by unfollowing

0:06:12.480 --> 0:06:16.479
<v Speaker 1>them or you know, I use Twitter for networking. Uh

0:06:16.520 --> 0:06:19.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, so sometimes if I'm seeing stuff that's just

0:06:20.000 --> 0:06:22.000
<v Speaker 1>overwhelming me, I say, you know what, you don't need

0:06:22.000 --> 0:06:23.960
<v Speaker 1>to be in the list anymore. I'm gonna You're gonna

0:06:23.960 --> 0:06:26.200
<v Speaker 1>take a break from you for a little bit. Um

0:06:26.200 --> 0:06:29.080
<v Speaker 1>And all this is, you know, in my posting, I

0:06:29.200 --> 0:06:31.200
<v Speaker 1>just try to share things that I enjoy about the

0:06:31.200 --> 0:06:33.880
<v Speaker 1>world or communicate with people who are in my areas

0:06:33.920 --> 0:06:37.080
<v Speaker 1>of interest. Podcasting, we talk a lot about horror on

0:06:37.120 --> 0:06:39.640
<v Speaker 1>the show, things like that, and especially with people who

0:06:39.640 --> 0:06:42.000
<v Speaker 1>are physically far away. I mean, I won't deny social

0:06:42.000 --> 0:06:44.520
<v Speaker 1>media has been a great tool for me to meet

0:06:44.680 --> 0:06:49.960
<v Speaker 1>people within our field and to make friends. Um. So, again, like,

0:06:50.800 --> 0:06:53.240
<v Speaker 1>there are problems here, and we're gonna talk about a

0:06:53.279 --> 0:06:55.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of problems that have been found with the research

0:06:56.000 --> 0:06:59.120
<v Speaker 1>in this, But I don't want to be technologically deterministic

0:06:59.160 --> 0:07:03.680
<v Speaker 1>and say Facebook is bad. Yeah, yeah, I mean I

0:07:03.960 --> 0:07:06.200
<v Speaker 1>love Facebook as a as a as a method of

0:07:06.640 --> 0:07:09.920
<v Speaker 1>sharing pictures of my my son, pictures of my family,

0:07:10.160 --> 0:07:13.240
<v Speaker 1>keeping up with with with with friends and family members

0:07:13.240 --> 0:07:15.640
<v Speaker 1>that are far away. Uh. And that's probably what I

0:07:15.720 --> 0:07:18.240
<v Speaker 1>use it for Facebook for the most personally, that and

0:07:18.280 --> 0:07:21.600
<v Speaker 1>just sharing of things that relate to my interests. Uh.

0:07:21.720 --> 0:07:24.920
<v Speaker 1>And then here at work, of course for stuff to

0:07:24.960 --> 0:07:27.560
<v Speaker 1>blow your mind. We share our content. We we curate

0:07:27.600 --> 0:07:29.880
<v Speaker 1>content that fits either our show brand or sort of

0:07:29.880 --> 0:07:32.920
<v Speaker 1>the loose host brand. So if you follow our our

0:07:32.960 --> 0:07:35.320
<v Speaker 1>our Facebook feed, you'll see a lot of stuff that's

0:07:35.360 --> 0:07:37.200
<v Speaker 1>not really attributed. But if something's like a little more

0:07:37.240 --> 0:07:40.120
<v Speaker 1>of a Christian thing or a little more Robert thing, etcetera,

0:07:40.360 --> 0:07:42.800
<v Speaker 1>then you're gonna see that we've we've tagged it, or

0:07:42.800 --> 0:07:44.480
<v Speaker 1>if the statement on is a little more in our

0:07:44.520 --> 0:07:47.160
<v Speaker 1>individual boys usually try to put our initials or something

0:07:47.200 --> 0:07:50.880
<v Speaker 1>like yeah yeah, But you know, it's basically comes to really,

0:07:50.920 --> 0:07:54.120
<v Speaker 1>I guess my approach to all the very social media

0:07:54.320 --> 0:07:57.240
<v Speaker 1>uses that I I use them as a way to

0:07:57.360 --> 0:07:59.040
<v Speaker 1>share things that I think are pretty cool or I

0:07:59.080 --> 0:08:02.040
<v Speaker 1>think are important. Yeah. I remember reading a blog post

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:05.720
<v Speaker 1>when smartphones first started becoming popular, and it was basically

0:08:05.960 --> 0:08:08.600
<v Speaker 1>like a like a sort of guide for for newbies

0:08:08.720 --> 0:08:11.000
<v Speaker 1>on like, what should you be posting to social media?

0:08:11.040 --> 0:08:12.400
<v Speaker 1>You want to get involved in this, how do you

0:08:12.440 --> 0:08:16.520
<v Speaker 1>do it? And you know, obviously we've gone awry since then,

0:08:16.720 --> 0:08:21.360
<v Speaker 1>but it was basically, what throughout your day as you

0:08:21.400 --> 0:08:24.000
<v Speaker 1>go throughout the world do you see that's wondrous that

0:08:24.120 --> 0:08:26.920
<v Speaker 1>makes you laugh or that you find interesting or insightful

0:08:27.080 --> 0:08:30.080
<v Speaker 1>or mean? Like, do you physically see something, take a

0:08:30.120 --> 0:08:32.680
<v Speaker 1>picture of it, share that and that excites you. Or

0:08:32.720 --> 0:08:35.040
<v Speaker 1>if you read an article that you think is insightful,

0:08:35.080 --> 0:08:38.360
<v Speaker 1>share that something along those lines. That's and that that's

0:08:38.360 --> 0:08:40.440
<v Speaker 1>for the most part, how I've always held it. I

0:08:40.480 --> 0:08:43.480
<v Speaker 1>am absolutely guilty any stuff to blow your mind. Listeners

0:08:43.559 --> 0:08:46.520
<v Speaker 1>who have followed me on Twitter know that I like

0:08:46.600 --> 0:08:50.720
<v Speaker 1>a good presidential debate and I like to live tweet

0:08:50.760 --> 0:08:53.600
<v Speaker 1>and make jokes during it that that I'm totally guilty

0:08:53.640 --> 0:08:56.000
<v Speaker 1>of that. But you know, for the most part, I

0:08:56.040 --> 0:08:58.120
<v Speaker 1>try to make it a curation of things that I

0:08:58.160 --> 0:09:00.120
<v Speaker 1>find in the world that are great. One thing that

0:09:00.200 --> 0:09:04.000
<v Speaker 1>really like about your social media feed is your wife's

0:09:04.000 --> 0:09:08.400
<v Speaker 1>a photographer, and so there's always these gorgeous pictures of

0:09:08.440 --> 0:09:11.520
<v Speaker 1>either your family or stuff that she's shooting out in

0:09:11.559 --> 0:09:14.160
<v Speaker 1>the world. As you guys travel around. Yeah, yeah, I'm

0:09:14.160 --> 0:09:17.840
<v Speaker 1>looking in that regard because the imagery is so important

0:09:17.960 --> 0:09:21.200
<v Speaker 1>on social media. And even though I know less about

0:09:21.240 --> 0:09:24.080
<v Speaker 1>photography and how to work the camera than virtually anybody

0:09:24.120 --> 0:09:26.640
<v Speaker 1>I know, my wife does all that, and uh, we're

0:09:26.640 --> 0:09:28.640
<v Speaker 1>able to get a good image out there. But you know,

0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:30.360
<v Speaker 1>that's that kind of ties into a lot of what

0:09:30.400 --> 0:09:34.480
<v Speaker 1>we're going to discuss today. It's the the image, the representation,

0:09:34.600 --> 0:09:36.800
<v Speaker 1>the thing that you put out there. Because ultimately, what

0:09:36.840 --> 0:09:39.040
<v Speaker 1>we're getting around to with all of this is that

0:09:39.320 --> 0:09:42.640
<v Speaker 1>your social media presence is kind of a is a

0:09:42.640 --> 0:09:44.400
<v Speaker 1>piece of you, but it is not the whole of you.

0:09:44.480 --> 0:09:47.400
<v Speaker 1>It is a version of yourself. And then everything that

0:09:47.480 --> 0:09:51.120
<v Speaker 1>you consume out there is a version of reality. So

0:09:51.200 --> 0:09:54.960
<v Speaker 1>you have this creation of the subjective self, a creation

0:09:55.000 --> 0:09:57.920
<v Speaker 1>of the subjective reality. And that is where we find

0:09:57.960 --> 0:10:03.840
<v Speaker 1>ourselves here, Um at the close and the dawn. We're

0:10:03.840 --> 0:10:07.920
<v Speaker 1>all performing ourselves in different ways. It always makes me

0:10:07.960 --> 0:10:14.480
<v Speaker 1>think of um, the great monologue play actor, uh Spalding Gray.

0:10:14.679 --> 0:10:17.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you've ever listened to Spalding Gray's

0:10:17.040 --> 0:10:19.960
<v Speaker 1>stuff before, but he would give these long, hour long

0:10:20.000 --> 0:10:22.520
<v Speaker 1>monologues about events in his life and people felt like

0:10:22.559 --> 0:10:24.839
<v Speaker 1>they knew him, they felt like he was their best friend.

0:10:25.440 --> 0:10:29.080
<v Speaker 1>And he would say that person who you're listening to

0:10:29.200 --> 0:10:32.520
<v Speaker 1>on stage, that's me, but that's not actually me. That's

0:10:32.520 --> 0:10:38.360
<v Speaker 1>a performance of myself. And he committed suicide before social

0:10:38.400 --> 0:10:40.760
<v Speaker 1>media really got big. So I would I would be

0:10:40.800 --> 0:10:44.959
<v Speaker 1>curious to see how what his opinion of Facebook or

0:10:45.000 --> 0:10:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Twitter would be, because I think that we're all kind

0:10:47.679 --> 0:10:49.920
<v Speaker 1>of doing the same thing. Now. Yeah, I mean, I've

0:10:49.960 --> 0:10:52.840
<v Speaker 1>I've read very compelling arguments that really even outside of

0:10:52.880 --> 0:10:56.280
<v Speaker 1>social media, where none of us are a particular individual,

0:10:56.320 --> 0:10:59.560
<v Speaker 1>where there's kind of this chorus of selves, right, with

0:10:59.760 --> 0:11:03.040
<v Speaker 1>some with louder voices than others, some with with voices

0:11:03.040 --> 0:11:05.200
<v Speaker 1>that are trailing off as we age, some with the

0:11:05.320 --> 0:11:08.880
<v Speaker 1>voices that are growing louder um. But yeah, the idea

0:11:08.960 --> 0:11:12.400
<v Speaker 1>that there's a particular you maybe doesn't even hold up

0:11:12.600 --> 0:11:15.199
<v Speaker 1>in the real world or in social media. Yeah, sure,

0:11:15.320 --> 0:11:18.440
<v Speaker 1>where that's that's I guess. Uh, this is the hippiest

0:11:18.440 --> 0:11:20.040
<v Speaker 1>thing I'm gonna say on stuff to bile your mind.

0:11:20.080 --> 0:11:22.640
<v Speaker 1>The beauty of humanity is where a myriad of identities.

0:11:24.640 --> 0:11:27.280
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, that on that note, let's let's move

0:11:27.320 --> 0:11:29.360
<v Speaker 1>into a little bit let's uh, let's let's get into

0:11:29.360 --> 0:11:32.800
<v Speaker 1>the meat of this episode and uh and discuss where

0:11:32.840 --> 0:11:35.679
<v Speaker 1>we are with social media, where we what the research

0:11:35.760 --> 0:11:41.360
<v Speaker 1>is saying. Okay, So, reportedly one in four people worldwide

0:11:41.640 --> 0:11:45.760
<v Speaker 1>are on social media, and fort of online adults are

0:11:45.840 --> 0:11:49.199
<v Speaker 1>using multiple social networking sites. That would include both of us.

0:11:50.200 --> 0:11:54.760
<v Speaker 1>On average, Americans spend seven points six hours a month

0:11:55.040 --> 0:11:59.040
<v Speaker 1>using social media. That sounds really low to me. I

0:11:59.080 --> 0:12:02.440
<v Speaker 1>would think it would be more like three hours a

0:12:02.520 --> 0:12:06.680
<v Speaker 1>day or something like that. There's a lot of of

0:12:06.679 --> 0:12:10.640
<v Speaker 1>of using social media while you're doing everything everything else, right, Yeah, exactly,

0:12:10.800 --> 0:12:14.000
<v Speaker 1>So I wonder if there's some misreporting going on there

0:12:14.040 --> 0:12:18.200
<v Speaker 1>or something. I'm not quite sure. Um, sixty of American

0:12:18.240 --> 0:12:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Facebook users logging daily, of them logging multiple times a day? Again, guilty,

0:12:25.840 --> 0:12:28.200
<v Speaker 1>So I'm I'm even though I'm only doing it in

0:12:28.240 --> 0:12:32.160
<v Speaker 1>the bathroom, it's multiple times a day. Uh. And a

0:12:32.240 --> 0:12:35.400
<v Speaker 1>good starting point for this episode that I found was

0:12:35.440 --> 0:12:38.839
<v Speaker 1>an article called Online Social Networking and Mental Health. It's

0:12:38.840 --> 0:12:41.720
<v Speaker 1>written by a guy named Igor Pantic and it was

0:12:41.720 --> 0:12:46.640
<v Speaker 1>published in the Journal of Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking.

0:12:47.720 --> 0:12:50.200
<v Speaker 1>So it's two years old. It's a little there's there's

0:12:50.240 --> 0:12:52.480
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more research that's been published out there,

0:12:52.960 --> 0:12:55.839
<v Speaker 1>but it's basically a review of all the research on

0:12:55.880 --> 0:12:59.000
<v Speaker 1>this topic that was done up until this point. Uh,

0:12:59.040 --> 0:13:00.920
<v Speaker 1>And so we're gonna throw it in along with the

0:13:00.960 --> 0:13:04.839
<v Speaker 1>research that we did for this episode. Before we get started, though,

0:13:04.920 --> 0:13:10.360
<v Speaker 1>let's let's acknowledge it's difficult to assess social media's effects

0:13:10.400 --> 0:13:12.640
<v Speaker 1>on mental health. Most of the studies that we're going

0:13:12.679 --> 0:13:16.480
<v Speaker 1>to present here, they use an approach a methodology of

0:13:16.600 --> 0:13:22.840
<v Speaker 1>correlation analysis. And remember, correlation doesn't actually equal causality. So

0:13:22.880 --> 0:13:26.480
<v Speaker 1>for example, we can't tell if Facebook causes low self

0:13:26.600 --> 0:13:30.600
<v Speaker 1>esteem or if people who already had low self esteem

0:13:30.640 --> 0:13:32.760
<v Speaker 1>are more likely to use it. We just we can't

0:13:32.800 --> 0:13:35.079
<v Speaker 1>tell which is the cause and which is the effect.

0:13:35.440 --> 0:13:38.520
<v Speaker 1>But regardless, there seems to be a relation, as we're

0:13:38.520 --> 0:13:42.439
<v Speaker 1>gonna talk about between low self esteem and Facebook. UM,

0:13:42.480 --> 0:13:44.640
<v Speaker 1>So just keep that in mind as we're going through

0:13:44.679 --> 0:13:47.680
<v Speaker 1>these studies. Yeah, and some of the studies we turned

0:13:47.679 --> 0:13:50.160
<v Speaker 1>to as well, like they're they're more general media studies,

0:13:50.160 --> 0:13:53.000
<v Speaker 1>so they may refer either to an earlier mode of

0:13:53.160 --> 0:13:56.600
<v Speaker 1>the Internet they may or social media use. They may

0:13:56.640 --> 0:14:01.240
<v Speaker 1>refer even to other media um services out there or

0:14:01.320 --> 0:14:05.440
<v Speaker 1>platforms such as television, so as far as our social

0:14:05.440 --> 0:14:08.400
<v Speaker 1>media age, the place where we're currently standing in the

0:14:08.480 --> 0:14:12.720
<v Speaker 1>needed uh it it all started innocently enough. Um. The

0:14:12.760 --> 0:14:16.840
<v Speaker 1>author Nicholas Carr has a wonderful article from Ian magazine

0:14:16.840 --> 0:14:20.640
<v Speaker 1>published earlier this year titled The Worldwide Cage, in which

0:14:20.640 --> 0:14:23.720
<v Speaker 1>he discusses the rise and in a sense, the spiritual

0:14:23.760 --> 0:14:27.040
<v Speaker 1>fall of social media. So you know, he points back

0:14:27.080 --> 0:14:29.520
<v Speaker 1>to the summer of two thousand five just being the

0:14:29.560 --> 0:14:32.680
<v Speaker 1>time when when Web two point oh really arrived and

0:14:32.680 --> 0:14:36.480
<v Speaker 1>and pump new life and money into my space flicker

0:14:36.640 --> 0:14:41.440
<v Speaker 1>linked in in the recently launched Facebook. Car rights quote cyberspace,

0:14:41.520 --> 0:14:45.720
<v Speaker 1>with its disembodied voices and ethereal avatars, seemed mystical from

0:14:45.720 --> 0:14:49.720
<v Speaker 1>the start. It's unearthly vastness a receptacle for the spiritual

0:14:49.800 --> 0:14:53.240
<v Speaker 1>yearnings and tropes of the US. What better way, wrote

0:14:53.240 --> 0:14:57.720
<v Speaker 1>the philosopher Michael him in The Erotic Ontology of Cyberspace,

0:14:58.960 --> 0:15:02.320
<v Speaker 1>to emulate God knowledge than to create a virtual world

0:15:02.600 --> 0:15:07.200
<v Speaker 1>constituted by bits of information and uh and Car points

0:15:07.240 --> 0:15:10.800
<v Speaker 1>to an August two thousand five Wired magazine cover article

0:15:11.040 --> 0:15:13.920
<v Speaker 1>that proclaimed the birth of a new world, empowered by

0:15:14.520 --> 0:15:18.080
<v Speaker 1>what he referred to as the electricity of participation. And

0:15:18.080 --> 0:15:21.160
<v Speaker 1>this is the quote from that particular article by Kevin Kelly.

0:15:21.200 --> 0:15:25.080
<v Speaker 1>We are the web. The electricity of participation nudges ordinary

0:15:25.120 --> 0:15:28.560
<v Speaker 1>folks to invest huge hunks of energy and time into

0:15:28.600 --> 0:15:32.080
<v Speaker 1>making free Encyclopedia is creating public tutorials for changing a

0:15:32.120 --> 0:15:35.560
<v Speaker 1>flat tire or cataloging the votes in the Senate. More

0:15:35.600 --> 0:15:38.480
<v Speaker 1>and more of the web runs in this mode. One

0:15:38.520 --> 0:15:41.600
<v Speaker 1>study found that of the web is commercial, the rest

0:15:41.680 --> 0:15:45.359
<v Speaker 1>runs on duty or passion. So we have this, this

0:15:45.360 --> 0:15:49.280
<v Speaker 1>this idea that the electricity of participation. It sounds great, right,

0:15:49.680 --> 0:15:52.840
<v Speaker 1>it does sound great, but it's also from the from

0:15:52.840 --> 0:15:57.160
<v Speaker 1>the inside of the media organization looking out. We know

0:15:57.880 --> 0:16:00.000
<v Speaker 1>that this is something that comes around and around again,

0:16:00.000 --> 0:16:02.800
<v Speaker 1>and if you google it you can learn more about it.

0:16:03.720 --> 0:16:07.560
<v Speaker 1>User generated content is the term that is used to

0:16:07.600 --> 0:16:10.520
<v Speaker 1>describe a lot of what Kevin Kelly is talking about here.

0:16:10.520 --> 0:16:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Now everything from reviews on Amazon to comments on a

0:16:16.080 --> 0:16:21.280
<v Speaker 1>YouTube video or every post on Facebook. Right, all of

0:16:21.320 --> 0:16:26.800
<v Speaker 1>it is content that's generated that makes somebody money. But

0:16:26.960 --> 0:16:29.120
<v Speaker 1>the but the people who are creating and the people

0:16:29.160 --> 0:16:31.240
<v Speaker 1>who are writing it or posting it or taking these

0:16:31.240 --> 0:16:35.400
<v Speaker 1>pictures or whatever, they're just doing it. Out of their participations.

0:16:35.440 --> 0:16:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Electricity of participation. Um, And I can't tell you how

0:16:38.880 --> 0:16:42.440
<v Speaker 1>many times as I've been working in this business. Every

0:16:42.480 --> 0:16:44.480
<v Speaker 1>couple of years it comes back around again. What if

0:16:44.520 --> 0:16:48.000
<v Speaker 1>we figured out some way to get the audience to

0:16:48.160 --> 0:16:52.120
<v Speaker 1>make something and then we can make money off of it. Right? Well,

0:16:52.480 --> 0:16:55.640
<v Speaker 1>and for me, the electricity of participation, it makes me think. Certainly,

0:16:55.680 --> 0:16:57.880
<v Speaker 1>you can think of all sorts of positive modes of

0:16:58.800 --> 0:17:03.520
<v Speaker 1>people getting involved, participating and creating great things, creating some

0:17:03.560 --> 0:17:06.880
<v Speaker 1>of the most amazing things in human history. But there's

0:17:06.880 --> 0:17:09.880
<v Speaker 1>also an electrictyer of participation to say, burning a witch

0:17:09.960 --> 0:17:13.960
<v Speaker 1>or something. Sure so yeah, so in these cases, particularly

0:17:14.040 --> 0:17:16.959
<v Speaker 1>what Kevin Kelly was talking about, it's really summoning up

0:17:16.960 --> 0:17:20.160
<v Speaker 1>to like the best high minded futuristic ideas of what

0:17:20.240 --> 0:17:23.120
<v Speaker 1>this could mean. But his car lays out these notions

0:17:23.160 --> 0:17:26.639
<v Speaker 1>were essentially blown up by quote over indulged rich guys

0:17:27.280 --> 0:17:31.080
<v Speaker 1>unquote who often went a bit cessational and forecasting the

0:17:31.119 --> 0:17:34.040
<v Speaker 1>coming tech utopia. So they based their predictions on their

0:17:34.040 --> 0:17:36.359
<v Speaker 1>early web, which was a smaller system and it was

0:17:36.359 --> 0:17:40.399
<v Speaker 1>populated by a smaller sampling of society. Yeah, you know,

0:17:40.520 --> 0:17:43.359
<v Speaker 1>I feel like the the ideal here was that like

0:17:43.400 --> 0:17:45.520
<v Speaker 1>the Internet was supposed to become sort of like the

0:17:45.560 --> 0:17:49.080
<v Speaker 1>modern era public coffee house, where there would be civilized

0:17:49.160 --> 0:17:52.800
<v Speaker 1>discourse and critical thought and everybody would respect one another.

0:17:53.200 --> 0:17:55.840
<v Speaker 1>And hey, it's early days yet, maybe it'll become that

0:17:55.960 --> 0:17:59.359
<v Speaker 1>at some point. But the most part what we see

0:17:59.640 --> 0:18:02.600
<v Speaker 1>is people trying to express really complicated ideas in a

0:18:02.680 --> 0:18:06.239
<v Speaker 1>hundred and forty characters or less. I'll read one more

0:18:06.320 --> 0:18:08.919
<v Speaker 1>quote from from car here, but I and and encourage

0:18:08.920 --> 0:18:11.800
<v Speaker 1>everyone to check out the article in full length. I'll

0:18:11.840 --> 0:18:13.440
<v Speaker 1>include a link to it on the landing page for

0:18:13.480 --> 0:18:16.280
<v Speaker 1>this episode. But he said, the culture that emerged on

0:18:16.280 --> 0:18:19.320
<v Speaker 1>the network and that now extends deep into our lives

0:18:19.320 --> 0:18:24.240
<v Speaker 1>and psychees, is characterized by frenetic production and consumption. Smartphones

0:18:24.280 --> 0:18:27.880
<v Speaker 1>have made medium machines of us all but little real

0:18:28.040 --> 0:18:32.320
<v Speaker 1>empowerment and even less reflectiveness. It's a culture of distraction

0:18:32.640 --> 0:18:38.159
<v Speaker 1>and dependency. Uh so here we are, Yeah, yeah, we

0:18:38.240 --> 0:18:40.520
<v Speaker 1>really have. I mean, it's it's kind of crazy to

0:18:40.600 --> 0:18:44.840
<v Speaker 1>me when I think back on how ingest a little

0:18:44.840 --> 0:18:48.080
<v Speaker 1>over ten years, we've just gone from zero to sixty

0:18:48.119 --> 0:18:51.760
<v Speaker 1>with social media. You know. Um, and this isn't to

0:18:51.800 --> 0:18:54.199
<v Speaker 1>be like I'm older or anything like that, but like

0:18:54.320 --> 0:18:58.960
<v Speaker 1>I remember getting my first iPod Touch and being like, oh,

0:18:59.000 --> 0:19:01.400
<v Speaker 1>I can take this with me anywhere where there's WiFi.

0:19:01.520 --> 0:19:03.560
<v Speaker 1>At the time, I had to have WiFi, and I

0:19:03.640 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 1>can write an email, or I can take a picture

0:19:07.119 --> 0:19:09.600
<v Speaker 1>or whatever, you know. And it was it literally was

0:19:09.680 --> 0:19:12.679
<v Speaker 1>like a sci fi thing had happened and just dropped

0:19:12.680 --> 0:19:17.280
<v Speaker 1>into my hand. And now it's just every day, you know.

0:19:17.359 --> 0:19:19.800
<v Speaker 1>And it's not just every day for our generation or

0:19:19.840 --> 0:19:22.680
<v Speaker 1>the generation before ours. I have friends who are baby

0:19:22.680 --> 0:19:25.879
<v Speaker 1>boomers that are in their mid to late sixties, and

0:19:26.160 --> 0:19:29.240
<v Speaker 1>they're using smartphones and Facebook and Twitter just as much

0:19:29.280 --> 0:19:31.840
<v Speaker 1>as the rest of us. It's a misconception to think

0:19:31.840 --> 0:19:35.080
<v Speaker 1>that it's just a tool for young people. Yeah, indeed,

0:19:35.119 --> 0:19:37.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's it's everywhere. It's it's through throughout society

0:19:37.520 --> 0:19:39.800
<v Speaker 1>and and the sci fi aspects of it. I can't

0:19:39.800 --> 0:19:43.200
<v Speaker 1>help but think back to to Doone Frank Herbert's done,

0:19:43.240 --> 0:19:46.200
<v Speaker 1>and the idea of the Butlerian Jahad, where people rose

0:19:46.320 --> 0:19:49.840
<v Speaker 1>up against against machines again, and we're empowered by this

0:19:49.880 --> 0:19:51.960
<v Speaker 1>notion that thou shalt not make machine and the likeness

0:19:51.960 --> 0:19:55.200
<v Speaker 1>of the human mind, which was never completely fleshed out

0:19:55.200 --> 0:19:58.880
<v Speaker 1>in Herbert's books. But it lends itself to different interpretations,

0:19:58.880 --> 0:20:01.040
<v Speaker 1>either the straight up termin or robots are coming to

0:20:01.040 --> 0:20:06.200
<v Speaker 1>get this idea, or machinery. Technology has changed the way

0:20:06.200 --> 0:20:08.159
<v Speaker 1>that we think too much, has changed the way that

0:20:08.200 --> 0:20:11.479
<v Speaker 1>we interact with the world, the way we process the world,

0:20:11.640 --> 0:20:15.320
<v Speaker 1>and that there is something inhuman about it it should

0:20:15.320 --> 0:20:18.920
<v Speaker 1>be rebelled against. Well, I'm gonna throw an idea out

0:20:18.960 --> 0:20:22.040
<v Speaker 1>here and then maybe let's go to an ad break. Uh.

0:20:22.040 --> 0:20:24.320
<v Speaker 1>This is based on a recent sci fi movie I saw.

0:20:24.359 --> 0:20:25.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to say the name because I don't

0:20:25.800 --> 0:20:30.439
<v Speaker 1>want to spoil it, but we know there's a theory

0:20:30.720 --> 0:20:35.720
<v Speaker 1>that language. Different languages change the way we think. Yeah, yeah,

0:20:35.800 --> 0:20:39.159
<v Speaker 1>so if you think of social media as a language,

0:20:39.800 --> 0:20:42.840
<v Speaker 1>then of course the way we think is going to

0:20:42.920 --> 0:20:49.840
<v Speaker 1>be uh malleable around that absolutely. All right, Well on that.

0:20:49.880 --> 0:20:51.359
<v Speaker 1>Now we're gonna take a quick break and we come back.

0:20:51.359 --> 0:20:53.960
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna jump back into into the topic. We're gonna

0:20:53.960 --> 0:20:57.359
<v Speaker 1>get into some more research, some more stats, and see

0:20:57.359 --> 0:21:01.800
<v Speaker 1>where we are in terms of social media sanity. The

0:21:01.800 --> 0:21:04.080
<v Speaker 1>holiday is almost here. You don't have time to go

0:21:04.119 --> 0:21:06.840
<v Speaker 1>to the post office. There's traffic, there's sparking. It's gonna

0:21:06.880 --> 0:21:09.879
<v Speaker 1>be packed with everyone mailing holiday gifts and packages, so

0:21:09.920 --> 0:21:12.159
<v Speaker 1>do what we do use stamps dot com instead. With

0:21:12.240 --> 0:21:14.280
<v Speaker 1>stamps dot com, you can avoid all the hassle of

0:21:14.280 --> 0:21:17.800
<v Speaker 1>going to post office during the busy holiday season. Everything

0:21:17.840 --> 0:21:19.200
<v Speaker 1>you can do with the post office you can do

0:21:19.320 --> 0:21:22.000
<v Speaker 1>right from your desk by in print official US posted

0:21:22.119 --> 0:21:24.680
<v Speaker 1>using your own computer and printer. Print postage for any

0:21:24.760 --> 0:21:27.000
<v Speaker 1>letter or package the instant you need it. Then the

0:21:27.119 --> 0:21:29.960
<v Speaker 1>mail person just picks it up. It's easy and convenient.

0:21:30.080 --> 0:21:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Here at how stuff works. We use stamps dot com

0:21:32.040 --> 0:21:33.560
<v Speaker 1>when we need to send out the odd bit of

0:21:33.680 --> 0:21:35.639
<v Speaker 1>merge or correspondence, and we want you to try it

0:21:35.720 --> 0:21:38.120
<v Speaker 1>as well. So right now, sign up for stamps dot

0:21:38.160 --> 0:21:41.080
<v Speaker 1>com and use our promo code stuff That's Stuff. For

0:21:41.240 --> 0:21:43.640
<v Speaker 1>this special offer you get a four week trial plus

0:21:43.680 --> 0:21:46.200
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and ten dollar bonus software that includes postage

0:21:46.480 --> 0:21:49.480
<v Speaker 1>and a digital scale. So don't wait. Go to stamps

0:21:49.520 --> 0:21:51.640
<v Speaker 1>dot com right now before you do anything else. Click

0:21:51.680 --> 0:21:53.240
<v Speaker 1>on the microphone at the top of the home page

0:21:53.240 --> 0:21:56.119
<v Speaker 1>and type in stuff that stamps dot com, Enter stuff

0:21:56.200 --> 0:22:03.000
<v Speaker 1>and start mailing things. All right, we have returned. Okay.

0:22:03.200 --> 0:22:07.760
<v Speaker 1>So in the late nineteen nineties, studies were originally published

0:22:08.080 --> 0:22:11.320
<v Speaker 1>that indicated that the internet's use had general effects on

0:22:11.400 --> 0:22:15.480
<v Speaker 1>our social relationships and our participation in community life. The

0:22:15.600 --> 0:22:20.040
<v Speaker 1>findings here were that increased time spent online related to

0:22:20.119 --> 0:22:23.840
<v Speaker 1>a decline in communication with family members, as well as

0:22:23.880 --> 0:22:27.520
<v Speaker 1>a reduction of the internet's user or the internet users

0:22:27.800 --> 0:22:31.400
<v Speaker 1>social circle, and all of this led back to depression

0:22:31.440 --> 0:22:34.960
<v Speaker 1>and loneliness. Let's step back from this for a second, though,

0:22:35.119 --> 0:22:38.920
<v Speaker 1>and evaluate these early studies weren't able to take into

0:22:38.960 --> 0:22:42.400
<v Speaker 1>account the new ways in which humans were creating communication

0:22:42.440 --> 0:22:46.240
<v Speaker 1>and social relationships outside of real life. Uh. And some

0:22:46.359 --> 0:22:49.960
<v Speaker 1>of these studies really read to me like a long

0:22:50.160 --> 0:22:53.600
<v Speaker 1>history of academia's phobia of new media when it first

0:22:53.640 --> 0:22:57.080
<v Speaker 1>comes up. Think of television, think of comic books, even right,

0:22:57.440 --> 0:22:59.800
<v Speaker 1>all of them had this backlash when they had a

0:23:00.040 --> 0:23:04.200
<v Speaker 1>urgent popularity. Now, for instance, these studies refer to social

0:23:04.280 --> 0:23:07.960
<v Speaker 1>media interactions as being shallow and unable to replace every

0:23:08.040 --> 0:23:11.479
<v Speaker 1>day face to face communication. I agree that they can

0:23:11.560 --> 0:23:15.560
<v Speaker 1>often be shallow, but there's also a possibility for meaningful,

0:23:15.720 --> 0:23:19.920
<v Speaker 1>deep communication there that might not be facilitated in real life,

0:23:20.119 --> 0:23:25.000
<v Speaker 1>especially for some people who maybe have real life social anxiety. Yeah,

0:23:25.160 --> 0:23:28.240
<v Speaker 1>or you're you're you know, you're you find yourself in

0:23:28.320 --> 0:23:32.120
<v Speaker 1>an area where like minded individuals are not necessarily there,

0:23:32.240 --> 0:23:35.960
<v Speaker 1>or or individuals who maybe um have a philosopher have

0:23:36.119 --> 0:23:40.879
<v Speaker 1>ideas that are beneficial to your identity. Um. Yeah, I

0:23:41.480 --> 0:23:43.720
<v Speaker 1>I always have to remind myself, you know, it's we

0:23:43.760 --> 0:23:46.040
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't forget that there was There was this time not

0:23:46.160 --> 0:23:48.960
<v Speaker 1>long ago, when there was this definite weird otherness to

0:23:49.080 --> 0:23:55.280
<v Speaker 1>online society and relationships. Like I remember not to sound

0:23:55.920 --> 0:23:58.639
<v Speaker 1>old or to sound like I'm trying to make myself

0:23:58.720 --> 0:24:02.080
<v Speaker 1>sound like this was you know, asked, Yeah, yeah, but

0:24:02.280 --> 0:24:04.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, like what ten years ago or so or

0:24:04.400 --> 0:24:07.320
<v Speaker 1>more like the MySpace era. Uh. You know, I remember

0:24:07.400 --> 0:24:10.280
<v Speaker 1>when you you maybe were less inclined to mention that

0:24:10.359 --> 0:24:13.240
<v Speaker 1>you met your significant other online because that would would

0:24:13.240 --> 0:24:14.719
<v Speaker 1>be kind of weird, Like that the kind of thing

0:24:14.800 --> 0:24:16.960
<v Speaker 1>you would in the best case scenario, you might make

0:24:17.880 --> 0:24:20.159
<v Speaker 1>an amusing rom com about it. But it's like what

0:24:20.440 --> 0:24:23.639
<v Speaker 1>you're meeting people online and dating them? Uh, there was

0:24:23.800 --> 0:24:27.879
<v Speaker 1>a weirdness in discussing online friends versus real friends, like

0:24:28.040 --> 0:24:30.600
<v Speaker 1>and and maybe even processing it, like coming to terms

0:24:30.680 --> 0:24:33.639
<v Speaker 1>with the fact. And I've certainly been there where like

0:24:33.760 --> 0:24:35.520
<v Speaker 1>the the there have been times in my life where

0:24:35.520 --> 0:24:38.880
<v Speaker 1>I feel like the online relationships and discussions I'm having

0:24:39.200 --> 0:24:42.119
<v Speaker 1>we're definitely more meaningful than than the ones I was

0:24:42.200 --> 0:24:46.320
<v Speaker 1>having in the real world. Yeah I had, I don't know.

0:24:46.880 --> 0:24:50.560
<v Speaker 1>It's a profound experience with this. Uh. That definitely changed

0:24:50.640 --> 0:24:56.840
<v Speaker 1>how I approached electronic media mediated communication, which was I was.

0:24:57.040 --> 0:25:00.560
<v Speaker 1>I am a recovering World of Warcraft addict, and I've

0:25:00.600 --> 0:25:04.960
<v Speaker 1>talked about this on on our sister podcast here Stuff

0:25:04.960 --> 0:25:08.160
<v Speaker 1>of Life before with Tracy V. Wilson Um. We both

0:25:08.200 --> 0:25:13.800
<v Speaker 1>played World of Warcraft. I replaced my social relationships with

0:25:13.880 --> 0:25:16.200
<v Speaker 1>World of Warcraft when I moved to Atlanta because I

0:25:16.280 --> 0:25:21.200
<v Speaker 1>didn't know anybody, and my wife and I would spend

0:25:21.280 --> 0:25:23.639
<v Speaker 1>I would say, eight to nine hours a day on

0:25:23.800 --> 0:25:26.520
<v Speaker 1>it um and the people who were on that with

0:25:26.840 --> 0:25:29.720
<v Speaker 1>us were our friends, and that was where we had

0:25:30.280 --> 0:25:32.480
<v Speaker 1>social relationships and we talked about what was going on

0:25:32.520 --> 0:25:35.480
<v Speaker 1>in the real world and and it was and I

0:25:35.640 --> 0:25:38.440
<v Speaker 1>knew people who were all who were even deeper into

0:25:38.520 --> 0:25:41.119
<v Speaker 1>it than I was, and they would say things to

0:25:41.240 --> 0:25:44.520
<v Speaker 1>me like I like this better than the real world.

0:25:44.560 --> 0:25:46.520
<v Speaker 1>I would rather be in here. And so we would

0:25:46.880 --> 0:25:48.840
<v Speaker 1>remember all the articles that were coming out around that

0:25:48.960 --> 0:25:50.960
<v Speaker 1>time of like like I believe that there was one

0:25:51.800 --> 0:25:55.480
<v Speaker 1>pretty infamous World of Warcraft player who died and they

0:25:55.560 --> 0:25:59.040
<v Speaker 1>had a funeral for this person in the game, hundreds

0:25:59.119 --> 0:26:01.320
<v Speaker 1>of thousands of avatars all showed up in this one

0:26:01.359 --> 0:26:04.840
<v Speaker 1>location and maybe crash the server or something like that. Uh.

0:26:05.440 --> 0:26:09.680
<v Speaker 1>And I have to say that during that time I

0:26:10.440 --> 0:26:16.440
<v Speaker 1>was depressed and was certainly addicted to that game, especially

0:26:16.520 --> 0:26:19.680
<v Speaker 1>like when I read through the research for today's episode,

0:26:19.960 --> 0:26:23.879
<v Speaker 1>I recognized behaviors in myself from that era. Uh. That

0:26:24.160 --> 0:26:25.800
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean like I was like, oh, I'm never gonna

0:26:25.800 --> 0:26:27.840
<v Speaker 1>play video games again, you know it could we talk

0:26:27.880 --> 0:26:29.399
<v Speaker 1>all the time on the show about video games and

0:26:29.440 --> 0:26:33.359
<v Speaker 1>stuff like that. But but immersing myself like that, the

0:26:33.480 --> 0:26:35.720
<v Speaker 1>way I did it, it wasn't healthy. So do you

0:26:35.760 --> 0:26:38.000
<v Speaker 1>feel like it was? It was more of a detriment

0:26:38.080 --> 0:26:40.000
<v Speaker 1>than a coping mech And because because you can, I

0:26:40.080 --> 0:26:41.680
<v Speaker 1>can also see like you could do the spin on

0:26:41.760 --> 0:26:43.399
<v Speaker 1>it where you could say, hey you it was a

0:26:44.240 --> 0:26:46.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of a lonely time and this was a social

0:26:47.160 --> 0:26:50.680
<v Speaker 1>um and biblical cord to connect you to like a

0:26:51.080 --> 0:26:54.040
<v Speaker 1>social existence. Yeah, it was both. Frankly, I mean like

0:26:54.240 --> 0:26:56.800
<v Speaker 1>it was it was one way to connect me with

0:26:56.920 --> 0:26:59.320
<v Speaker 1>people I had just moved to a new city where

0:26:59.320 --> 0:27:01.760
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know all to people. But then at the

0:27:01.840 --> 0:27:04.879
<v Speaker 1>same time, it was also like the the how do

0:27:04.960 --> 0:27:07.080
<v Speaker 1>I put this? World of Warcraft is a really good

0:27:07.200 --> 0:27:10.360
<v Speaker 1>job of stringing a carrot along in front of your face,

0:27:10.440 --> 0:27:13.360
<v Speaker 1>so you you have to keep playing right, And sometimes

0:27:13.440 --> 0:27:16.399
<v Speaker 1>it became outside of the social relationships. It was just

0:27:16.560 --> 0:27:18.880
<v Speaker 1>like I have to be on to do the thing.

0:27:19.040 --> 0:27:22.760
<v Speaker 1>I can't miss the thing. Uh, And man, did I

0:27:22.880 --> 0:27:26.600
<v Speaker 1>see a lot of human beings have meltdowns in that game?

0:27:27.840 --> 0:27:32.000
<v Speaker 1>So uh, it's just it's interesting. I mean, also, if

0:27:32.040 --> 0:27:33.680
<v Speaker 1>you if you go and look, I'm sure there's probably

0:27:33.840 --> 0:27:37.320
<v Speaker 1>a hundred dissertations that are written about social communication and

0:27:37.400 --> 0:27:41.160
<v Speaker 1>World of Warcraft. But that's just my personal experience with it. Yeah,

0:27:41.160 --> 0:27:43.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't have any personal experience with World of Warcraft,

0:27:43.359 --> 0:27:46.600
<v Speaker 1>but I've certainly turned to games at times, like I

0:27:46.680 --> 0:27:49.240
<v Speaker 1>remember when the first SIMS game came out. Yeah, I

0:27:49.400 --> 0:27:55.200
<v Speaker 1>was that like kind of a an unemployed, un unguided

0:27:55.320 --> 0:27:57.080
<v Speaker 1>phase in my life. I want to say, it was

0:27:57.200 --> 0:27:59.280
<v Speaker 1>like the it came out like the one of the

0:27:59.320 --> 0:28:02.040
<v Speaker 1>summers after I graduated high school, and I just wasn't

0:28:02.119 --> 0:28:04.040
<v Speaker 1>sure what I was doing. But you could go in

0:28:04.119 --> 0:28:07.760
<v Speaker 1>and play the SIMS game, and it was It got

0:28:07.840 --> 0:28:10.760
<v Speaker 1>surreal and depressing pretty quickly when you realize you're sending

0:28:10.800 --> 0:28:14.920
<v Speaker 1>your fake people out for job interviews and they're buying houses,

0:28:15.000 --> 0:28:16.680
<v Speaker 1>and then you're like, God, what am I doing? And this?

0:28:16.840 --> 0:28:20.480
<v Speaker 1>What am I listening to? This this awful ambient piano music. Um,

0:28:20.920 --> 0:28:23.840
<v Speaker 1>do you want to hear a really messed up story

0:28:23.880 --> 0:28:25.920
<v Speaker 1>about the SIMS that will probably make you think less

0:28:25.960 --> 0:28:29.320
<v Speaker 1>of me? Okay? And that goes for you too, audience.

0:28:29.840 --> 0:28:32.000
<v Speaker 1>When I played the SIMS, I got addicted to it

0:28:32.080 --> 0:28:34.000
<v Speaker 1>for about a month or so. And what I would

0:28:34.040 --> 0:28:35.600
<v Speaker 1>do is I was in a job that I was

0:28:35.680 --> 0:28:37.920
<v Speaker 1>very unhappy and at the time, and I used the

0:28:38.000 --> 0:28:42.920
<v Speaker 1>SIMS to construct my office uh floor plan exactly like

0:28:43.080 --> 0:28:45.400
<v Speaker 1>my office was. And then I would put SIMS in

0:28:45.880 --> 0:28:49.120
<v Speaker 1>who are all of my coworkers, including my boss, who

0:28:49.200 --> 0:28:51.400
<v Speaker 1>we all really hated at the time, and they gave

0:28:51.480 --> 0:28:54.760
<v Speaker 1>them personality attributes that were similar to what their's were

0:28:54.800 --> 0:28:57.600
<v Speaker 1>in real life. And then I would occasionally do things

0:28:57.720 --> 0:29:00.640
<v Speaker 1>like my boss would, you know, go into the bathroom

0:29:01.080 --> 0:29:04.239
<v Speaker 1>and I would freeze time and some put a put

0:29:04.320 --> 0:29:06.680
<v Speaker 1>a cement wall in front of the door. And and

0:29:07.000 --> 0:29:08.920
<v Speaker 1>lock him in there for a week with no food,

0:29:09.760 --> 0:29:16.360
<v Speaker 1>and that came fed into every like dark fantasy, you know,

0:29:17.000 --> 0:29:19.600
<v Speaker 1>and I would just sit there and and laugh at it,

0:29:19.640 --> 0:29:22.920
<v Speaker 1>and it was cathartic. But it's also looking back on it,

0:29:23.040 --> 0:29:27.000
<v Speaker 1>that's some that's some messed up stuff. Yeah. I certainly

0:29:27.160 --> 0:29:28.920
<v Speaker 1>can relate to some of that with some of the

0:29:28.960 --> 0:29:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Grand Theft auto games. I guess the Vice City when

0:29:30.960 --> 0:29:32.640
<v Speaker 1>that came out, I remember spending way too much time

0:29:32.640 --> 0:29:35.240
<v Speaker 1>in that. And it's not always being a you know,

0:29:35.280 --> 0:29:40.200
<v Speaker 1>like a positive expression of self. Yeah, this is very

0:29:40.280 --> 0:29:43.160
<v Speaker 1>West World now, Yeah, getting into that territory. Well, you know,

0:29:43.800 --> 0:29:46.080
<v Speaker 1>any of Philip K. Dick readers out there, if you've

0:29:46.080 --> 0:29:50.320
<v Speaker 1>read the story The Three Stigmata of Palmer Eldric, there's this, uh,

0:29:50.600 --> 0:29:52.800
<v Speaker 1>there's this little plot. I don't know if it's even

0:29:52.800 --> 0:29:54.240
<v Speaker 1>a plot points, but once since I've read it, but

0:29:54.280 --> 0:29:57.680
<v Speaker 1>there's this thing that comes up. These perky pat dolls

0:29:57.720 --> 0:30:00.880
<v Speaker 1>they're called, that people were assed with and they build

0:30:00.920 --> 0:30:04.200
<v Speaker 1>these little houses, or that they buy these little houses

0:30:04.240 --> 0:30:05.959
<v Speaker 1>and they film with these dolls, and these dolls kind

0:30:05.960 --> 0:30:07.640
<v Speaker 1>of live out their live out their own little lives,

0:30:07.760 --> 0:30:11.520
<v Speaker 1>and people, you know, kind of live through them. I

0:30:11.640 --> 0:30:13.760
<v Speaker 1>feel like that in a way like served as a

0:30:14.560 --> 0:30:17.080
<v Speaker 1>as a as an excellent metaphor for a lot of

0:30:17.200 --> 0:30:21.320
<v Speaker 1>what's going on today with virtual worlds and in the Internet. Again,

0:30:21.360 --> 0:30:23.320
<v Speaker 1>not to say that that that encapsulates all of it,

0:30:23.680 --> 0:30:26.719
<v Speaker 1>not to discount all the positive aspects, but there's certainly

0:30:26.800 --> 0:30:29.840
<v Speaker 1>a perky patentist to it. Weird easter egg that I

0:30:29.960 --> 0:30:33.280
<v Speaker 1>just figured out from you mentioning that short story. Isn't

0:30:33.320 --> 0:30:35.720
<v Speaker 1>Palmer Eldritch the name of the bad guy in the strain?

0:30:36.080 --> 0:30:38.840
<v Speaker 1>So that must be an homage to Philip I think

0:30:38.920 --> 0:30:43.040
<v Speaker 1>it is. Yeah, I think the the old corporate guy

0:30:43.200 --> 0:30:45.719
<v Speaker 1>who's working together with the vampiresh How did I never

0:30:45.760 --> 0:30:49.280
<v Speaker 1>put that together? It's strange anyways. All right, so let's

0:30:49.400 --> 0:30:52.560
<v Speaker 1>let's move on and discuss some more of the depressive

0:30:52.600 --> 0:30:56.040
<v Speaker 1>symptoms associated with social networking. Right, So, after these nineties

0:30:56.080 --> 0:30:58.400
<v Speaker 1>studies that were just sort of generalizing the Internet, it

0:30:58.560 --> 0:31:01.840
<v Speaker 1>led to studies into pressive symptoms that were associated with

0:31:01.960 --> 0:31:06.440
<v Speaker 1>social networking. One study found a correlation between high school

0:31:06.480 --> 0:31:09.480
<v Speaker 1>students and depressive symptoms, and the way they did this

0:31:09.640 --> 0:31:14.080
<v Speaker 1>was by using something called the back depression inventory. Now, Robert,

0:31:14.120 --> 0:31:16.239
<v Speaker 1>you wanna give us just like a primer on how

0:31:16.320 --> 0:31:18.360
<v Speaker 1>that works. Yeah. So basically, this is a twenty one

0:31:18.480 --> 0:31:21.640
<v Speaker 1>question multiple choice self report inventory. So it's a common

0:31:22.000 --> 0:31:26.600
<v Speaker 1>psychometric test for measuring the severity of depression, scoring minimal

0:31:26.720 --> 0:31:31.440
<v Speaker 1>to severe depression based on questions such as, uh, which

0:31:31.520 --> 0:31:34.480
<v Speaker 1>of which of these you know expresses your feelings? I

0:31:34.560 --> 0:31:36.680
<v Speaker 1>do not feel sad, I feel sad, I am sad

0:31:36.760 --> 0:31:38.560
<v Speaker 1>all the time and can't snap out of it. Or

0:31:38.640 --> 0:31:41.280
<v Speaker 1>I am so sad and unhappy that I cannot stand it.

0:31:41.560 --> 0:31:43.520
<v Speaker 1>And those would be like you would score like a zero,

0:31:43.640 --> 0:31:45.680
<v Speaker 1>a one, or two or three depending on which one

0:31:45.760 --> 0:31:48.680
<v Speaker 1>you picked. Based on my Facebook feed in the last week,

0:31:48.920 --> 0:31:51.640
<v Speaker 1>I am seeing a lot of the last one. I

0:31:51.720 --> 0:31:54.960
<v Speaker 1>am so sad or unhappy that I can't stand it. Um.

0:31:55.440 --> 0:31:58.320
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know if that's hyperbole or if it's

0:31:58.400 --> 0:32:02.400
<v Speaker 1>what people are actually feeling or not, but these tools

0:32:02.480 --> 0:32:05.560
<v Speaker 1>seem to be adequate. Yeah, I mean it comes to

0:32:05.600 --> 0:32:08.560
<v Speaker 1>an important question, like the expression of feeling is his

0:32:08.640 --> 0:32:12.040
<v Speaker 1>emotional reality? If you if you, if you, you know,

0:32:12.080 --> 0:32:15.040
<v Speaker 1>accuse somebody of expressing something and say like, oh, you

0:32:15.200 --> 0:32:17.400
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't feel that or you don't feel that, Like that's

0:32:18.600 --> 0:32:22.000
<v Speaker 1>that's ridiculous. Yeah, it's kind of like a paranormal experience,

0:32:23.880 --> 0:32:27.360
<v Speaker 1>it's still an experience. What an individual's experience is their

0:32:27.440 --> 0:32:32.480
<v Speaker 1>subjective experience. UM, don't try and put this objective mold

0:32:32.560 --> 0:32:35.160
<v Speaker 1>over how they should be feeling A reactive Yeah. I

0:32:35.200 --> 0:32:37.120
<v Speaker 1>think we've said this on the show before, when we've

0:32:37.160 --> 0:32:40.240
<v Speaker 1>talked about like the paranormal and science and relation to it.

0:32:40.720 --> 0:32:43.640
<v Speaker 1>I may not believe in the paranormal, but I believe

0:32:43.720 --> 0:32:48.320
<v Speaker 1>that that the people who are experiencing it believe it right,

0:32:48.480 --> 0:32:52.080
<v Speaker 1>and so therefore it's real to them. So when they

0:32:52.240 --> 0:32:55.000
<v Speaker 1>use this study, they compared it to television, and they

0:32:55.040 --> 0:32:59.400
<v Speaker 1>found that there is no correlation between television and depression.

0:33:00.040 --> 0:33:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Other authors argued that this isn't true for older adolescents.

0:33:04.120 --> 0:33:06.680
<v Speaker 1>It's only true for younger ones that they get depressed

0:33:06.720 --> 0:33:09.480
<v Speaker 1>when they're on social networking. So there's a possibility that

0:33:09.600 --> 0:33:13.960
<v Speaker 1>different age groups react differently to the challenges of social networking.

0:33:14.520 --> 0:33:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Then there's this study that found that that young adults

0:33:18.640 --> 0:33:24.160
<v Speaker 1>subjective perception of well being and life satisfaction was possibly

0:33:24.240 --> 0:33:27.560
<v Speaker 1>being undermined by social networking. The way that they did

0:33:27.640 --> 0:33:30.840
<v Speaker 1>this was they would text message the participants five times

0:33:30.880 --> 0:33:34.440
<v Speaker 1>a day for two weeks to evaluate at that point

0:33:34.480 --> 0:33:36.800
<v Speaker 1>in time, what their mental state was, what kind of

0:33:36.880 --> 0:33:42.040
<v Speaker 1>social interactions they were having, and what their Facebook use was. Now, personally,

0:33:42.960 --> 0:33:46.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to imagine the challenges I went through in

0:33:46.120 --> 0:33:49.479
<v Speaker 1>a high school being kind of a nerdy, geeky kid,

0:33:50.040 --> 0:33:53.160
<v Speaker 1>and I can't picture how Facebook would have made my

0:33:53.320 --> 0:33:58.120
<v Speaker 1>life better. I just I really can't. Uh So, It's

0:33:58.320 --> 0:34:00.440
<v Speaker 1>that's tough for me to wrap my head around. But

0:34:00.520 --> 0:34:03.200
<v Speaker 1>the other tricky thing here is that researchers have found

0:34:04.160 --> 0:34:09.200
<v Speaker 1>that Facebook creates altered perceptions of physical and personality traits

0:34:09.280 --> 0:34:13.080
<v Speaker 1>of other users, leading us to incorrect conclusions about what

0:34:13.120 --> 0:34:16.480
<v Speaker 1>their characteristics are. So, for example, when four and twenty

0:34:16.560 --> 0:34:20.240
<v Speaker 1>five undergraduate students at a state university in Utah were studied,

0:34:20.640 --> 0:34:24.720
<v Speaker 1>they reported that Facebook made them think other people's lives

0:34:24.760 --> 0:34:28.360
<v Speaker 1>were happier than theirs, which lead them to constantly feeling

0:34:28.440 --> 0:34:32.080
<v Speaker 1>like life wasn't fair. And then this in itself doesn't

0:34:32.200 --> 0:34:35.480
<v Speaker 1>lead to depression, but those who are already predisposed to

0:34:35.800 --> 0:34:39.960
<v Speaker 1>anxiety or depression may find that it negatively impacts their

0:34:39.960 --> 0:34:44.759
<v Speaker 1>mental health. And there's still no conclusive evidence that Facebook

0:34:45.239 --> 0:34:49.480
<v Speaker 1>causes depression. I want to reiterate that there's no there's correlation,

0:34:49.600 --> 0:34:52.920
<v Speaker 1>but there's not causation here. Um, where we are in

0:34:53.000 --> 0:34:55.160
<v Speaker 1>the infancy of these studies, there's still a lot more

0:34:55.239 --> 0:35:00.960
<v Speaker 1>to go. People have started confronting this on Facebook or

0:35:01.000 --> 0:35:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Twitter or wherever by writing about how they may look

0:35:05.120 --> 0:35:08.880
<v Speaker 1>okay in their profile or their feed, but in reality

0:35:09.239 --> 0:35:13.000
<v Speaker 1>they're dealing with anxiety and depression, and they're confronting that

0:35:13.120 --> 0:35:16.520
<v Speaker 1>it's a curated version of reality. Even when we're being

0:35:16.680 --> 0:35:19.120
<v Speaker 1>honest about the negatives in our lives, it's still a

0:35:19.239 --> 0:35:24.160
<v Speaker 1>curated version of reality. So when researchers have tracked online behaviors,

0:35:24.239 --> 0:35:29.520
<v Speaker 1>they've found that there are certain Facebook habits that accompany depression.

0:35:29.960 --> 0:35:33.760
<v Speaker 1>For instance, people are more likely to focus on features

0:35:34.040 --> 0:35:37.319
<v Speaker 1>that focus on depression tips and facts on Facebook if

0:35:37.320 --> 0:35:40.560
<v Speaker 1>they're depressed. Well, that seems like a no brainer. But

0:35:41.040 --> 0:35:44.040
<v Speaker 1>they've also found that depression is related to having fewer

0:35:44.160 --> 0:35:48.279
<v Speaker 1>Facebook friends. This one's weird to me. Location tagging, the

0:35:48.320 --> 0:35:53.760
<v Speaker 1>whole geotagging phenomenon is has a correlation to depressed users

0:35:53.840 --> 0:35:55.239
<v Speaker 1>as well. I guess you kind of have to be

0:35:55.320 --> 0:35:57.799
<v Speaker 1>excited about where you are on some level to tag

0:35:57.880 --> 0:36:01.160
<v Speaker 1>yourself there. Like I don't really use duo tagging a lot.

0:36:01.280 --> 0:36:04.719
<v Speaker 1>But if I do, it's probably because say I went

0:36:04.880 --> 0:36:06.680
<v Speaker 1>to the zoo with my son and we had a

0:36:06.719 --> 0:36:08.840
<v Speaker 1>good time, or we went to the Center for Puppetry

0:36:08.880 --> 0:36:10.919
<v Speaker 1>Yards we had a good time. You know, it's I'm

0:36:11.120 --> 0:36:13.680
<v Speaker 1>I generally don't do it, say at the doctor's office.

0:36:14.160 --> 0:36:17.120
<v Speaker 1>You know that's the right thing. Yeah. Um, And this

0:36:17.239 --> 0:36:19.520
<v Speaker 1>seems like a good point. I want to remind everybody

0:36:19.680 --> 0:36:22.160
<v Speaker 1>of something. This pops up on a ton of house

0:36:22.160 --> 0:36:25.520
<v Speaker 1>stuff works programming, whether it's a video or text or podcasting,

0:36:25.960 --> 0:36:29.280
<v Speaker 1>something called Dunbar's Number. We have a brain stuff episode

0:36:29.320 --> 0:36:32.000
<v Speaker 1>of this. The way it goes is like this, it's

0:36:32.040 --> 0:36:34.440
<v Speaker 1>a study. First of all, there's a study that indicated

0:36:34.520 --> 0:36:37.720
<v Speaker 1>that the average American knows about six hundred people. Okay,

0:36:38.320 --> 0:36:41.879
<v Speaker 1>another study said, no, that's wrong, the average American only

0:36:41.920 --> 0:36:44.480
<v Speaker 1>knows two hundred and nine people. Well why is there

0:36:44.520 --> 0:36:47.040
<v Speaker 1>such a difference. Well, it depends on how well you

0:36:47.239 --> 0:36:52.160
<v Speaker 1>actually know them. So incomes Robin Dunbar, who's an anthropologist

0:36:52.200 --> 0:36:55.440
<v Speaker 1>and evolutionary psychologist from the University of Oxford, and he

0:36:55.600 --> 0:36:59.400
<v Speaker 1>proposes that our brains are hardwired to have a cognitive

0:36:59.520 --> 0:37:02.320
<v Speaker 1>limit on the number of people we know. This is

0:37:02.360 --> 0:37:06.440
<v Speaker 1>based on the correlation between the size of a primate's

0:37:06.480 --> 0:37:10.279
<v Speaker 1>brain and the size of its average social group. Now,

0:37:10.360 --> 0:37:15.800
<v Speaker 1>for humans, Dunbar's number was one hundred and fifty on average.

0:37:15.880 --> 0:37:20.440
<v Speaker 1>This means you can only have stable social relationships with

0:37:20.640 --> 0:37:23.960
<v Speaker 1>between roughly a hundred and two hundred people. Again not

0:37:24.120 --> 0:37:29.040
<v Speaker 1>conclusively proven though, Okay, but when researchers at Indiana University

0:37:29.160 --> 0:37:34.040
<v Speaker 1>analyzed the history of three million Twitter users, they identified

0:37:34.120 --> 0:37:37.719
<v Speaker 1>that twenty five million of these conversations where people maintain

0:37:37.920 --> 0:37:42.640
<v Speaker 1>actual relationships only occurred between one hundred and two hundred people.

0:37:43.080 --> 0:37:45.680
<v Speaker 1>So this seems there seems to be evidence that's leaning

0:37:45.760 --> 0:37:48.840
<v Speaker 1>towards this that you know, Yeah, I've got six hundred

0:37:48.880 --> 0:37:51.839
<v Speaker 1>people I follow on Twitter or however many on Facebook, right,

0:37:51.880 --> 0:37:56.880
<v Speaker 1>but I'm really only having relationships that are like quality

0:37:56.920 --> 0:38:01.400
<v Speaker 1>communication with somewhere between a hundred and two hundred people. Okay,

0:38:01.520 --> 0:38:06.000
<v Speaker 1>but that's online, right, exactly. Well, and in real life too, right,

0:38:06.080 --> 0:38:11.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean you have to consider a lot of the people. Frankly, nowadays,

0:38:11.200 --> 0:38:12.839
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the people that are part of your

0:38:12.920 --> 0:38:16.080
<v Speaker 1>real life world are also your online friends. Yeah, yeah,

0:38:16.120 --> 0:38:18.239
<v Speaker 1>and I think I certainly don't know a hundred and

0:38:18.320 --> 0:38:21.840
<v Speaker 1>fifty people in my real life. Yeah, Like, like I

0:38:21.920 --> 0:38:25.359
<v Speaker 1>think about say, for instance, you, me and Joe, we work,

0:38:25.400 --> 0:38:27.799
<v Speaker 1>we work together, we see each other like I see

0:38:27.840 --> 0:38:30.640
<v Speaker 1>you guys more than I see uh like most of

0:38:30.680 --> 0:38:34.600
<v Speaker 1>my friends. So we don't. We don't actually interact like

0:38:34.800 --> 0:38:37.399
<v Speaker 1>socially on social media all that much because you kind

0:38:37.400 --> 0:38:41.680
<v Speaker 1>of don't have to. Likewise, um, you've probably seen these,

0:38:41.800 --> 0:38:44.799
<v Speaker 1>uh these little clouds of terms that come up where

0:38:44.880 --> 0:38:48.200
<v Speaker 1>people show like what they were facebooking about this year

0:38:48.320 --> 0:38:51.640
<v Speaker 1>and and you know it'll be the big world center. Yeah,

0:38:51.680 --> 0:38:54.560
<v Speaker 1>the word clouds. So so like, I found this this

0:38:54.680 --> 0:38:56.879
<v Speaker 1>trend with a lot of people where like the thing

0:38:57.000 --> 0:38:59.319
<v Speaker 1>in the center of their life was not their significant other.

0:39:00.000 --> 0:39:01.879
<v Speaker 1>And I'm one level you might say, like, oh, why

0:39:02.080 --> 0:39:05.320
<v Speaker 1>why wasn't your your wife, your husband, etcetera in the

0:39:05.400 --> 0:39:07.840
<v Speaker 1>center of your cloud in big bold letters. Well, I

0:39:07.920 --> 0:39:10.880
<v Speaker 1>think part of that is that, like the relationship with

0:39:10.920 --> 0:39:12.879
<v Speaker 1>your signal now that goes beyond it goes beyond face.

0:39:13.000 --> 0:39:15.480
<v Speaker 1>You see them every day, you're talking to them, uh,

0:39:15.680 --> 0:39:18.520
<v Speaker 1>so you're not having to tag them necessarily, you know,

0:39:18.680 --> 0:39:20.520
<v Speaker 1>in a post all the time. Yeah, I mean my

0:39:20.760 --> 0:39:23.120
<v Speaker 1>wife is one of the few people who's privy to

0:39:23.840 --> 0:39:27.279
<v Speaker 1>what my actual life is. Like, Yeah, she knows about

0:39:27.320 --> 0:39:30.680
<v Speaker 1>the ups and downs. Uh, so I don't need to

0:39:31.560 --> 0:39:34.440
<v Speaker 1>post to her. I mean we do, we chat on

0:39:34.520 --> 0:39:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Facebook occasionally and stuff like that and make jokes, but like,

0:39:37.640 --> 0:39:39.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, she knows what's really going on with me.

0:39:40.000 --> 0:39:41.600
<v Speaker 1>I know what's really going on with her, So we

0:39:41.640 --> 0:39:44.879
<v Speaker 1>don't need to have that mediation in between. Yeah. Yeah,

0:39:44.960 --> 0:39:47.680
<v Speaker 1>so that sometimes we lose sight of that, that fact

0:39:47.760 --> 0:39:50.560
<v Speaker 1>that that the this, this social realm and the social

0:39:50.600 --> 0:39:54.520
<v Speaker 1>media realm is not the be all, and it's not

0:39:54.640 --> 0:39:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Also it's also not a one to one reflection of

0:39:57.560 --> 0:40:01.960
<v Speaker 1>what our social life consists of. So let's also remember this.

0:40:02.160 --> 0:40:05.520
<v Speaker 1>There's other research that's out there that online communication with

0:40:05.680 --> 0:40:10.239
<v Speaker 1>friends and family is associated with a decline in depression

0:40:10.640 --> 0:40:14.759
<v Speaker 1>and can strengthen social ties to benefit mental health. So

0:40:14.880 --> 0:40:18.160
<v Speaker 1>there's contrary views here. Once again, I think it's how

0:40:18.280 --> 0:40:21.560
<v Speaker 1>you're using the medium, not necessarily that the medium itself.

0:40:22.200 --> 0:40:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Um yeah, it. So there's this Pew research study. We

0:40:27.760 --> 0:40:29.160
<v Speaker 1>bring them up all the time on the show that

0:40:29.520 --> 0:40:32.520
<v Speaker 1>I call them the Masters of Surveys. They do all

0:40:32.600 --> 0:40:35.040
<v Speaker 1>the surveys and they've got all this data on um,

0:40:35.840 --> 0:40:38.800
<v Speaker 1>just just contemporary life Uh, And they did a survey

0:40:38.880 --> 0:40:41.920
<v Speaker 1>to establish whether and how much social media is stressing

0:40:42.000 --> 0:40:44.760
<v Speaker 1>people out. And to this end, they used a different scale,

0:40:44.800 --> 0:40:49.040
<v Speaker 1>it's called the perceived stress scale, to quantify how people

0:40:49.080 --> 0:40:54.000
<v Speaker 1>were upset, maybe out of control, feeling stressed, nervous, irritated,

0:40:54.560 --> 0:40:56.960
<v Speaker 1>or they were unable to cope with things in their lives.

0:40:57.040 --> 0:41:00.880
<v Speaker 1>And these were their findings. Those who are more educated

0:41:01.000 --> 0:41:03.800
<v Speaker 1>and those who are married or live with a partner

0:41:04.200 --> 0:41:08.120
<v Speaker 1>have less social media related stress. So that's interesting. That

0:41:08.200 --> 0:41:10.160
<v Speaker 1>relates to what we're just talking about, that you've got

0:41:10.320 --> 0:41:14.800
<v Speaker 1>somebody to sort of be yourself with. I suppose the

0:41:14.960 --> 0:41:20.040
<v Speaker 1>frequency of social media use has no direct relationship in men.

0:41:20.400 --> 0:41:23.040
<v Speaker 1>And what they mean by this is that men that

0:41:23.120 --> 0:41:26.759
<v Speaker 1>they've studied would have the same level of stress regardless

0:41:26.760 --> 0:41:29.920
<v Speaker 1>of whether they're using social media or not. But in women,

0:41:30.440 --> 0:41:34.120
<v Speaker 1>the use of some technologies is actually tied to lowering

0:41:34.360 --> 0:41:40.000
<v Speaker 1>stress for them. Uh. Social media users may be more

0:41:40.080 --> 0:41:44.120
<v Speaker 1>aware of stressful events happening to their friends and family,

0:41:44.600 --> 0:41:49.200
<v Speaker 1>and they perceive higher levels of social support within these networks. Generally,

0:41:49.560 --> 0:41:51.320
<v Speaker 1>we see this as a benefit. Right. It's sort of

0:41:51.400 --> 0:41:55.120
<v Speaker 1>like returning to the sort of what what's the term

0:41:55.239 --> 0:41:59.759
<v Speaker 1>like world village, you know, that kind of thing where

0:41:59.760 --> 0:42:02.800
<v Speaker 1>we're we're interacting as if we do physically live in

0:42:02.880 --> 0:42:06.279
<v Speaker 1>proximity to one another, even though we don't. So it's

0:42:06.280 --> 0:42:08.400
<v Speaker 1>seen as having a benefit. But but what if it

0:42:08.480 --> 0:42:11.520
<v Speaker 1>comes at a cost. So the average adult they interviewed

0:42:11.840 --> 0:42:17.040
<v Speaker 1>experienced five out of twelve possible stressful events solely through

0:42:17.120 --> 0:42:20.880
<v Speaker 1>their family and friends on social media. So social media

0:42:21.080 --> 0:42:24.759
<v Speaker 1>users are much more aware of major events in the

0:42:24.920 --> 0:42:28.439
<v Speaker 1>lives of the people close to them. But also they're

0:42:28.480 --> 0:42:33.040
<v Speaker 1>getting this surge of all these bad things are happening,

0:42:33.160 --> 0:42:37.040
<v Speaker 1>all these major quote unquote negative events are happening. Oh

0:42:37.160 --> 0:42:39.560
<v Speaker 1>my god. But when you pull back and you look

0:42:39.600 --> 0:42:42.600
<v Speaker 1>out at the lens, it's like, well, they're not all

0:42:42.719 --> 0:42:47.680
<v Speaker 1>happening on your street. They're all they're just happening in

0:42:47.840 --> 0:42:51.839
<v Speaker 1>the world. But it it comes back to a cultivation

0:42:52.480 --> 0:42:56.000
<v Speaker 1>and it it reminds me of mean World syndrome, which

0:42:56.040 --> 0:42:59.760
<v Speaker 1>stems from cultivation theory. This is a social theory developed

0:42:59.800 --> 0:43:02.759
<v Speaker 1>by George Gerbner and Larry Gross of the University of

0:43:02.800 --> 0:43:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Pennsylvania in the mid nineteen sixties, and their whole focus

0:43:06.160 --> 0:43:10.080
<v Speaker 1>was examining the long term effects of television. So very

0:43:10.120 --> 0:43:13.560
<v Speaker 1>different form of media. But but but but very related

0:43:13.600 --> 0:43:15.960
<v Speaker 1>in many senses, because in essence, the idea here is

0:43:16.040 --> 0:43:21.160
<v Speaker 1>that TV was slash. He is cultivating our culture. Like

0:43:21.239 --> 0:43:23.560
<v Speaker 1>I can't help but think of you know, Shepherd, Fairies,

0:43:23.680 --> 0:43:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Obey and John Carpenters they live. You know, the idea

0:43:29.040 --> 0:43:32.360
<v Speaker 1>that TV is feeding our brains, that it's informing our minds,

0:43:32.480 --> 0:43:36.080
<v Speaker 1>both explicitly and implicitly on who and what we are,

0:43:36.400 --> 0:43:39.880
<v Speaker 1>what sort of world we live in, cultivating viewers conceptions

0:43:39.920 --> 0:43:42.759
<v Speaker 1>of social reality. And it seems that you know, much

0:43:42.760 --> 0:43:44.480
<v Speaker 1>of the same as going on in social media age.

0:43:44.520 --> 0:43:47.640
<v Speaker 1>We cultivate our cultivation to some degree, but we're still

0:43:47.880 --> 0:43:52.200
<v Speaker 1>shackled to external views of social reality, social reality on individual,

0:43:52.239 --> 0:43:57.920
<v Speaker 1>on the individual, on subcultural cultural international levels. What should

0:43:58.280 --> 0:44:00.640
<v Speaker 1>my life look like? What should my body, Addie look like?

0:44:01.360 --> 0:44:04.640
<v Speaker 1>What what should the world look like? Now? I'm thinking

0:44:05.040 --> 0:44:07.520
<v Speaker 1>that what the world needs, as John Carpenter to make

0:44:07.640 --> 0:44:10.640
<v Speaker 1>they live too. And it's all about social media and

0:44:10.719 --> 0:44:14.279
<v Speaker 1>it stars the rock and uh, you're more of a

0:44:14.320 --> 0:44:16.399
<v Speaker 1>wrestling fan than I am. Who else would work in there?

0:44:16.560 --> 0:44:21.080
<v Speaker 1>John Cena? I guess Uh, he's the roddy Roddy Piper

0:44:21.200 --> 0:44:24.640
<v Speaker 1>of our time. Either's not one that's true, you can

0:44:24.680 --> 0:44:27.320
<v Speaker 1>never be read, can't be replaced, and and he sadly

0:44:27.360 --> 0:44:31.000
<v Speaker 1>passed away. Um, but yeah, we need a roddy roddy piper,

0:44:31.120 --> 0:44:34.680
<v Speaker 1>somebody who's willing to fight through the subjective reality that

0:44:34.880 --> 0:44:38.600
<v Speaker 1>are that that social media and uh, the media is

0:44:39.040 --> 0:44:42.840
<v Speaker 1>reflecting on its someone that passes the shades. Yeah, absolutely so,

0:44:43.280 --> 0:44:45.920
<v Speaker 1>all right, before we get into whether social media is

0:44:46.000 --> 0:44:49.400
<v Speaker 1>quote unquote destroying our self esteem, let's back up what

0:44:49.600 --> 0:44:54.320
<v Speaker 1>self esteem. It's defined generally as the evaluative component of

0:44:54.440 --> 0:44:58.600
<v Speaker 1>the self, the degree to which one prizes, values, and

0:44:58.680 --> 0:45:02.360
<v Speaker 1>approves of or life makes oneself, and it's crucial to

0:45:02.520 --> 0:45:06.480
<v Speaker 1>maintaining quality of life. If you have low self esteem,

0:45:06.719 --> 0:45:09.080
<v Speaker 1>that leads to depression. It can also lead to eating

0:45:09.160 --> 0:45:14.640
<v Speaker 1>disorders and addiction and other health problems. Now, one explanation

0:45:14.760 --> 0:45:18.320
<v Speaker 1>for a negative relationship between social networking and self esteem

0:45:18.440 --> 0:45:23.040
<v Speaker 1>is that self presentation is the primary user activity there,

0:45:23.120 --> 0:45:26.319
<v Speaker 1>and it seems like narcissistic behavior to us if we're

0:45:26.320 --> 0:45:28.800
<v Speaker 1>watching it from afar. Right, So, a study of a

0:45:28.920 --> 0:45:33.120
<v Speaker 1>hundred Facebook users at York University found that individuals with

0:45:33.360 --> 0:45:37.680
<v Speaker 1>low self esteem are more active online promoting their own

0:45:37.760 --> 0:45:41.520
<v Speaker 1>content but another study included groups of students parts who

0:45:41.600 --> 0:45:46.239
<v Speaker 1>are participants and exposed them to first a mirror and

0:45:46.320 --> 0:45:51.080
<v Speaker 1>then second their Facebook profile, and third a control setting,

0:45:51.480 --> 0:45:53.800
<v Speaker 1>and the results show that there were positive effects on

0:45:53.880 --> 0:45:59.720
<v Speaker 1>their self esteem for Facebook. Uh. Objective self awareness theory basically,

0:45:59.760 --> 0:46:02.759
<v Speaker 1>see just that any stimulus that causes ourselves to become

0:46:02.800 --> 0:46:05.799
<v Speaker 1>an object, like looking in a mirror, for instance, will

0:46:06.000 --> 0:46:10.520
<v Speaker 1>lead us to a diminished impression of ourselves. Now consider

0:46:11.000 --> 0:46:13.319
<v Speaker 1>when you're looking at your own Facebook profile, You're looking

0:46:13.400 --> 0:46:17.200
<v Speaker 1>at photos, biographical data, your relationship status, all of this.

0:46:17.719 --> 0:46:20.719
<v Speaker 1>So some people theorize this may lead to a reduction

0:46:20.800 --> 0:46:24.560
<v Speaker 1>and self esteem. So again we've got some contrary research

0:46:24.640 --> 0:46:27.319
<v Speaker 1>and points of view going on here. There's also something

0:46:27.360 --> 0:46:30.600
<v Speaker 1>called the hyper personal model, and it proposes that there

0:46:30.640 --> 0:46:36.000
<v Speaker 1>are advantages to computer mediated communication for self esteem. The

0:46:36.200 --> 0:46:39.279
<v Speaker 1>argument here is basically that online you have the time

0:46:39.360 --> 0:46:42.960
<v Speaker 1>to select the aspects of your character that you believe

0:46:43.040 --> 0:46:47.480
<v Speaker 1>will be viewed most favorably by the receivers of your content.

0:46:47.840 --> 0:46:50.880
<v Speaker 1>When you contrast this to your real life interactions, you

0:46:51.080 --> 0:46:54.240
<v Speaker 1>don't have the time to constantly present your most positive

0:46:54.280 --> 0:46:58.160
<v Speaker 1>features to the people around you. So social media may

0:46:58.400 --> 0:47:02.680
<v Speaker 1>even spread happiness in some situations. So we we talked

0:47:02.719 --> 0:47:06.040
<v Speaker 1>about that Pew research study that said that women find

0:47:06.120 --> 0:47:11.080
<v Speaker 1>that it increases their their their happiness. Happy status updates

0:47:11.239 --> 0:47:15.759
<v Speaker 1>encourage others to post happy status updates about themselves, and

0:47:16.040 --> 0:47:19.799
<v Speaker 1>some some researchers even worry that it could cause something

0:47:19.880 --> 0:47:24.399
<v Speaker 1>that they're titling the epidemic of well being, that there's

0:47:24.440 --> 0:47:29.040
<v Speaker 1>no Heaven forbid too much. Yeah, of showing how great

0:47:29.120 --> 0:47:31.840
<v Speaker 1>your life is in the world. Uh, this is interesting

0:47:31.880 --> 0:47:34.560
<v Speaker 1>because this is something that will definitely come up later

0:47:34.760 --> 0:47:39.880
<v Speaker 1>again in the podcast when we're specifically discussing Facebook's utilization

0:47:39.960 --> 0:47:44.160
<v Speaker 1>of their algorithms. Oh yeah. Uh. All in all, again,

0:47:44.320 --> 0:47:47.520
<v Speaker 1>this is super complex. It doesn't necessarily seem that the

0:47:47.640 --> 0:47:50.640
<v Speaker 1>medium itself is inherently leading to poor self esteem, but

0:47:51.120 --> 0:47:54.880
<v Speaker 1>the habits of being competitive, comparing your achievements with others,

0:47:55.360 --> 0:48:00.359
<v Speaker 1>incorrectly perceiving others, as well as jealousy and narcissism all

0:48:00.480 --> 0:48:05.400
<v Speaker 1>contribute to negative self esteem. Now, from my point of view, uh,

0:48:05.560 --> 0:48:08.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, my my education background is in communication. This

0:48:08.800 --> 0:48:11.759
<v Speaker 1>all seems to relate to general communication theory and how

0:48:11.840 --> 0:48:16.440
<v Speaker 1>interpersonal relationships are maintained and how conflict is managed. It's

0:48:16.520 --> 0:48:19.560
<v Speaker 1>just in a different way, right, But but the general

0:48:20.160 --> 0:48:24.239
<v Speaker 1>sort of way that we model communication from one human

0:48:24.280 --> 0:48:27.560
<v Speaker 1>being to the next still applies here. Some studies even

0:48:27.600 --> 0:48:30.840
<v Speaker 1>indicate that social networking sites may actually be a useful

0:48:30.920 --> 0:48:35.040
<v Speaker 1>tool in identifying individuals with mental health issues. And I

0:48:35.120 --> 0:48:38.600
<v Speaker 1>wrote next to this, you think after looking at Facebook

0:48:38.640 --> 0:48:41.120
<v Speaker 1>profile for the last year, I think some of the

0:48:41.200 --> 0:48:44.040
<v Speaker 1>people I know who might have mental health issues are

0:48:44.080 --> 0:48:47.759
<v Speaker 1>starting to realize that themselves. But there are indicators that

0:48:48.000 --> 0:48:51.360
<v Speaker 1>there's fewer pictures, less communication, but maybe they have a

0:48:51.520 --> 0:48:55.640
<v Speaker 1>really long filled out profile and fewer friends. These people

0:48:55.719 --> 0:49:00.160
<v Speaker 1>were more likely to experience social in headonia while there

0:49:00.239 --> 0:49:03.080
<v Speaker 1>on social media, meaning that they did not have the

0:49:03.160 --> 0:49:06.560
<v Speaker 1>ability to encounter happiness from the activities in their life

0:49:06.640 --> 0:49:09.759
<v Speaker 1>that they normally found enjoyable. All right, so we have

0:49:09.920 --> 0:49:14.200
<v Speaker 1>this thing that paradoxically it seems to make us happy

0:49:14.400 --> 0:49:17.319
<v Speaker 1>and you know, help us live our lives, but then

0:49:17.360 --> 0:49:19.919
<v Speaker 1>at the same time just really pushes us to two

0:49:20.000 --> 0:49:25.200
<v Speaker 1>loads of of self loathing or you know, the apathy

0:49:25.360 --> 0:49:29.480
<v Speaker 1>and just despair. Uh. Are we addicted to it? Are

0:49:29.600 --> 0:49:33.240
<v Speaker 1>we addicted to this thing that makes us happy and miserable?

0:49:33.600 --> 0:49:37.399
<v Speaker 1>It certainly wouldn't be the first, uh uh property. Yeah,

0:49:37.440 --> 0:49:39.800
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna say that. That's the way you're describing it.

0:49:39.920 --> 0:49:41.719
<v Speaker 1>It's just it sounds like all the other things that

0:49:41.800 --> 0:49:44.839
<v Speaker 1>were It sounds like sounds like alcohol. Yeah. So we're

0:49:44.880 --> 0:49:46.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna take a quick break and we come back. We

0:49:46.520 --> 0:49:52.160
<v Speaker 1>will get into the social media addiction. Are you hiring?

0:49:52.520 --> 0:49:54.799
<v Speaker 1>Do you know where to post your job to find

0:49:54.840 --> 0:49:57.359
<v Speaker 1>the best candidates? Posting your job in one place isn't

0:49:57.480 --> 0:49:59.960
<v Speaker 1>enough to find quality candidates these days. If you want

0:50:00.000 --> 0:50:02.080
<v Speaker 1>to find the perfect higher you need to post your

0:50:02.160 --> 0:50:04.600
<v Speaker 1>job at all the top sites, and now you can.

0:50:04.960 --> 0:50:07.160
<v Speaker 1>With zip recruiter dot com. You can post your job

0:50:07.400 --> 0:50:10.840
<v Speaker 1>to a hundred plus job sites, including social media networks

0:50:10.880 --> 0:50:13.919
<v Speaker 1>like Facebook and Twitter, all with a single click. Find

0:50:14.000 --> 0:50:17.560
<v Speaker 1>candidates in any city or industry nationwide. Just post once

0:50:17.680 --> 0:50:20.719
<v Speaker 1>and watch your qualified candidates roll into zip recruiters easy

0:50:20.760 --> 0:50:24.320
<v Speaker 1>to use interface, no juggling emails or calls to your office.

0:50:24.760 --> 0:50:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Quickly screen candidates, raped them and hire the right person fast.

0:50:28.760 --> 0:50:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Find out today why zip recruiter dot com is used

0:50:31.200 --> 0:50:35.320
<v Speaker 1>by over one million businesses and right now our listeners

0:50:35.360 --> 0:50:38.239
<v Speaker 1>can post jobs on zip recruiter for free by going

0:50:38.320 --> 0:50:42.239
<v Speaker 1>to zip recruiter dot com slash mind blown. That's zip

0:50:42.320 --> 0:50:45.439
<v Speaker 1>recruiter dot com slash mind blown one more time. Try

0:50:45.520 --> 0:50:48.080
<v Speaker 1>it for free. Go to zip recruiter dot com slash

0:50:48.360 --> 0:50:53.759
<v Speaker 1>mind blown. Okay, we're back. So the big question here

0:50:53.800 --> 0:50:57.680
<v Speaker 1>on the table is are we actually addicted to social media? Well,

0:50:58.280 --> 0:51:02.560
<v Speaker 1>whether or not it's addictive has not been debated for

0:51:02.760 --> 0:51:05.800
<v Speaker 1>very long in psychiatric literature. But what would define it

0:51:06.360 --> 0:51:11.320
<v Speaker 1>is if social media users had a mental preoccupation with

0:51:11.680 --> 0:51:15.560
<v Speaker 1>social media that leads to their neglect of other social functions,

0:51:15.640 --> 0:51:19.640
<v Speaker 1>whether that's family or real life friends. In addition, they

0:51:19.680 --> 0:51:24.640
<v Speaker 1>would suddenly cease their online social networking sometimes and that

0:51:24.719 --> 0:51:28.240
<v Speaker 1>would cause signs and symptoms that resemble those of people

0:51:28.320 --> 0:51:31.480
<v Speaker 1>abstaining from drugs and alcohol. It's one of the problems, right,

0:51:31.600 --> 0:51:33.959
<v Speaker 1>is that with addiction you kind of have lower case

0:51:34.000 --> 0:51:37.959
<v Speaker 1>addiction and capital letter addictions. So there's there's the there's

0:51:37.960 --> 0:51:41.879
<v Speaker 1>the there're the little addictions that we talk about in life, um,

0:51:42.560 --> 0:51:44.600
<v Speaker 1>and then there are the big ones that you know,

0:51:44.680 --> 0:51:46.279
<v Speaker 1>a lot of us are fortunate enough to not have

0:51:46.480 --> 0:51:51.360
<v Speaker 1>to deal with, yeah, or at all. But then there

0:51:51.360 --> 0:51:53.880
<v Speaker 1>are things that seem to sort of uh, we've in

0:51:54.000 --> 0:51:56.920
<v Speaker 1>that space between yeah, I mean, for my part um.

0:51:57.400 --> 0:51:59.839
<v Speaker 1>So I grew up in a household with a parent

0:52:00.080 --> 0:52:04.239
<v Speaker 1>who was an alcoholic, and luckily they went through alcoholics anonymous,

0:52:04.600 --> 0:52:09.279
<v Speaker 1>they're sober now. But I recognized within myself from that experience,

0:52:09.640 --> 0:52:12.360
<v Speaker 1>I have an addictive personality. It's something that I inherited.

0:52:12.960 --> 0:52:16.879
<v Speaker 1>Uh And so yeah, I'm always conscious, especially if things

0:52:16.960 --> 0:52:18.920
<v Speaker 1>like this. You know, I mentioned that whole world of

0:52:18.960 --> 0:52:23.360
<v Speaker 1>warcraft thing earlier, that there's uh possibility there for me

0:52:23.440 --> 0:52:27.200
<v Speaker 1>to get too far into something like if it has

0:52:27.280 --> 0:52:31.080
<v Speaker 1>that addictive quality. Now with social media again, let's look

0:52:31.080 --> 0:52:34.520
<v Speaker 1>at some of the research. According to Dr Shannon m.

0:52:34.840 --> 0:52:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Rauch of Benedictine University, which is in Mesa, Arizona, one

0:52:39.520 --> 0:52:42.440
<v Speaker 1>of the main reasons we use social media is to

0:52:42.560 --> 0:52:46.440
<v Speaker 1>distract ourselves or maybe we're bored and we want relief

0:52:46.520 --> 0:52:50.000
<v Speaker 1>from that boredom. So every time we log in, we're

0:52:50.080 --> 0:52:54.279
<v Speaker 1>delivered reinforcement in the forms of likes and comments or

0:52:54.400 --> 0:52:58.279
<v Speaker 1>whatever people communicating back with us. So when behaviors that

0:52:58.360 --> 0:53:03.359
<v Speaker 1>are reinforced are heated, it becomes hard to stop doing them. Right,

0:53:03.520 --> 0:53:06.960
<v Speaker 1>You're you're being You're given positive reinforcement for them. This

0:53:07.120 --> 0:53:11.160
<v Speaker 1>is like Pavlov one on one uh. In addition, researchers

0:53:11.239 --> 0:53:15.320
<v Speaker 1>at I Believe It's Free University in Germany found that

0:53:15.520 --> 0:53:20.440
<v Speaker 1>this positive feedback correlation shows strong activity in the nucleus

0:53:20.520 --> 0:53:25.640
<v Speaker 1>accumbents of our brains where we associate reward processing. So

0:53:25.719 --> 0:53:28.880
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand twelve, a group of researchers developed something

0:53:29.080 --> 0:53:35.799
<v Speaker 1>called the Facebook Addiction Scale to score mood tolerance, withdrawal, conflict,

0:53:35.920 --> 0:53:39.000
<v Speaker 1>and relapse, and they tested it on four hundred and

0:53:39.120 --> 0:53:43.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty three students and found that it was relatively reliable.

0:53:43.680 --> 0:53:45.920
<v Speaker 1>What's worth noting here, though, is that there are a

0:53:46.040 --> 0:53:49.280
<v Speaker 1>variety of activities that you can do on Facebook beside

0:53:49.360 --> 0:53:53.279
<v Speaker 1>quote unquote social networking, right, Like people play games on there.

0:53:53.480 --> 0:53:55.960
<v Speaker 1>They're doing all kinds of things. Facebook has made itself

0:53:56.320 --> 0:53:59.880
<v Speaker 1>ubiquitous in our lives because it's not just social networking anymore.

0:54:00.000 --> 0:54:01.879
<v Speaker 1>I always forget that they have gains, Like they don't

0:54:01.880 --> 0:54:07.439
<v Speaker 1>get invites anymore to like whatever, you know, farm coaster. Yeah,

0:54:07.480 --> 0:54:10.440
<v Speaker 1>it's never that was never my thing either. But maybe

0:54:10.520 --> 0:54:13.200
<v Speaker 1>that's just maybe we're a different generation or something. Maybe

0:54:13.200 --> 0:54:16.920
<v Speaker 1>they're really fun, we're just missing out. Yeah. Another study

0:54:17.080 --> 0:54:22.280
<v Speaker 1>adapted the Internet Addiction Questionnaire, which was a pre existing document,

0:54:22.640 --> 0:54:26.600
<v Speaker 1>to test Facebook dependence with students, and then they tested

0:54:26.760 --> 0:54:30.160
<v Speaker 1>the sleep quality of these Facebook users. What they found

0:54:30.360 --> 0:54:34.560
<v Speaker 1>was that Facebook dependence may be related to poor quality

0:54:34.640 --> 0:54:37.680
<v Speaker 1>of sleep. What's worth remembering here is that we don't

0:54:37.800 --> 0:54:41.560
<v Speaker 1>know if social media addiction is an actual disorder or

0:54:41.640 --> 0:54:45.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's a manifestation of other mental issues. As it stands,

0:54:45.680 --> 0:54:47.680
<v Speaker 1>the good old d s M, the d s M

0:54:47.760 --> 0:54:49.960
<v Speaker 1>five is our our current one, I believe, which is

0:54:50.040 --> 0:54:53.480
<v Speaker 1>the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. It does

0:54:53.560 --> 0:54:57.800
<v Speaker 1>not list social media addiction as an actual mental disorder.

0:54:58.520 --> 0:55:01.840
<v Speaker 1>If it is an addiction, per the latest revision of

0:55:01.880 --> 0:55:06.640
<v Speaker 1>the International Classification of Diseases and Health Problems, it would

0:55:06.680 --> 0:55:11.680
<v Speaker 1>have the following symptoms. A strong desire or sense of compulsion,

0:55:12.480 --> 0:55:21.200
<v Speaker 1>difficulty controlling consumption behavior, and psychological withdrawal after reduction or cessation.

0:55:22.080 --> 0:55:24.640
<v Speaker 1>I can I can relate to all of those. I

0:55:24.719 --> 0:55:28.320
<v Speaker 1>think I've mentioned on past episodes that when it was

0:55:28.440 --> 0:55:33.920
<v Speaker 1>January when with my family to Jamaica and our our

0:55:34.120 --> 0:55:37.880
<v Speaker 1>crappy phone plan just did not work at all on

0:55:38.560 --> 0:55:42.120
<v Speaker 1>on the island of Jamaica, so I just did not

0:55:42.239 --> 0:55:44.600
<v Speaker 1>use my phone and it was was it was maddening

0:55:44.880 --> 0:55:47.240
<v Speaker 1>at first, like I kept like reaching from my pocket

0:55:47.320 --> 0:55:49.759
<v Speaker 1>to make sure it was there, and and it took

0:55:49.920 --> 0:55:51.600
<v Speaker 1>it took a couple of days to sort of move

0:55:51.760 --> 0:55:54.560
<v Speaker 1>through the idea that I was not connected to this

0:55:54.680 --> 0:55:58.480
<v Speaker 1>thing anymore, right, Yeah, yeah, absolutely, I mean I know

0:55:58.680 --> 0:56:01.279
<v Speaker 1>I've talked to Joe about this before. Well Joe, uh,

0:56:02.400 --> 0:56:04.320
<v Speaker 1>not to speak for him here, but he for the

0:56:04.400 --> 0:56:06.840
<v Speaker 1>most part doesn't use social media, I think because of

0:56:06.880 --> 0:56:08.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the things we're talking about here, but

0:56:08.560 --> 0:56:12.799
<v Speaker 1>he's definitely taken like internet vacations you know where I've

0:56:12.880 --> 0:56:14.680
<v Speaker 1>done this before, to where you get you rent a

0:56:14.719 --> 0:56:17.120
<v Speaker 1>cabin in the woods somewhere, you have your phones but

0:56:17.200 --> 0:56:18.719
<v Speaker 1>you just don't look at them for a weekend or

0:56:18.760 --> 0:56:22.399
<v Speaker 1>something like that, and it could be cathartic. Uh. Last

0:56:22.440 --> 0:56:26.200
<v Speaker 1>thing here, Dr Cecil and Drayson from the University of

0:56:26.280 --> 0:56:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Bergen in Norway has developed the berg Facebook Addiction Scale

0:56:32.560 --> 0:56:36.040
<v Speaker 1>and they use six criteria to measure this thing. What

0:56:36.200 --> 0:56:39.200
<v Speaker 1>they found is that people who are already anxious and

0:56:39.360 --> 0:56:44.040
<v Speaker 1>socially insecure are more likely to use social networking. So

0:56:44.200 --> 0:56:49.680
<v Speaker 1>potentially Facebook addicts are using the site to gain attention

0:56:49.760 --> 0:56:52.320
<v Speaker 1>and boost their self esteem. So it becomes this like

0:56:52.480 --> 0:56:55.640
<v Speaker 1>vicious circle. Basically that like they're using it to make

0:56:55.680 --> 0:57:00.239
<v Speaker 1>themselves feel better, but they're already insecure and depressed. They're

0:57:00.239 --> 0:57:02.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna circle back around to that and then go back

0:57:02.680 --> 0:57:06.800
<v Speaker 1>to the uh trough literally for this reward, you know.

0:57:07.360 --> 0:57:10.160
<v Speaker 1>All right, So let's let's think about the children then

0:57:10.520 --> 0:57:12.560
<v Speaker 1>for a minute, as we we often do with the

0:57:12.719 --> 0:57:15.440
<v Speaker 1>technology and with the evolution of social media and the

0:57:15.600 --> 0:57:19.360
<v Speaker 1>and the Internet, because you always have the generation that

0:57:19.560 --> 0:57:22.520
<v Speaker 1>came into it more or less fully formed, and then

0:57:22.560 --> 0:57:25.520
<v Speaker 1>there's the generation that's born into it. Uh. And I

0:57:25.600 --> 0:57:28.280
<v Speaker 1>mean that's just going to continue. Uh. You know. For

0:57:28.440 --> 0:57:30.560
<v Speaker 1>for us, it's like, oh, I remember growing up without

0:57:30.600 --> 0:57:32.880
<v Speaker 1>the Internet in the house. Other people I remember growing

0:57:32.960 --> 0:57:35.080
<v Speaker 1>up about Facebook in the house, and then it's gonna

0:57:35.120 --> 0:57:38.760
<v Speaker 1>be I remember growing up with my my own organic

0:57:38.840 --> 0:57:42.760
<v Speaker 1>eyes as opposed to these uh metallic implants that are

0:57:42.800 --> 0:57:48.680
<v Speaker 1>now mandate eyes. Uh. Yeah. So a great quote that

0:57:48.760 --> 0:57:50.400
<v Speaker 1>I found that I want to start this off with

0:57:50.640 --> 0:57:56.400
<v Speaker 1>was from Time Magazines. Susannah Shrubsdorff. She wrote a piece

0:57:56.560 --> 0:57:59.360
<v Speaker 1>in Time that was called the Kids Aren't All Right,

0:57:59.560 --> 0:58:02.560
<v Speaker 1>and it uh is about general mental health issues in

0:58:02.680 --> 0:58:06.360
<v Speaker 1>teenagers in America, but does discuss social media a lot.

0:58:06.680 --> 0:58:11.400
<v Speaker 1>And she says in my dozens of conversations with teens, parents, clinicians,

0:58:11.520 --> 0:58:15.080
<v Speaker 1>and school counselors across the country, there was a pervasive

0:58:15.200 --> 0:58:19.320
<v Speaker 1>sense that being a teenager today is a draining, full

0:58:19.440 --> 0:58:24.080
<v Speaker 1>time job that includes doing school work, managing a social

0:58:24.200 --> 0:58:30.600
<v Speaker 1>media identity, and fretting about a career. Climate change, sexism, racism,

0:58:31.040 --> 0:58:35.120
<v Speaker 1>you name it. Every fight or slight is documented online

0:58:35.360 --> 0:58:39.320
<v Speaker 1>for hours or days after the incident, and it's exhausting.

0:58:40.240 --> 0:58:43.720
<v Speaker 1>So again, I said this earlier, I can't imagine my

0:58:43.920 --> 0:58:47.840
<v Speaker 1>high school experience, which I feel was challenging. I'm so

0:58:48.000 --> 0:58:50.000
<v Speaker 1>glad I'm not in high school anymore. I love being

0:58:50.040 --> 0:58:53.440
<v Speaker 1>an adult. Uh, how it would be made better by

0:58:53.480 --> 0:58:55.720
<v Speaker 1>social media? And then I think about these kids. I

0:58:56.120 --> 0:58:59.240
<v Speaker 1>thought about about you and Bastion, because you've got a

0:58:59.360 --> 0:59:01.880
<v Speaker 1>son who's grow growing up in a world of social media. Yeah,

0:59:02.080 --> 0:59:05.720
<v Speaker 1>it's uh, it's it's tough to think about. Hi, I

0:59:05.800 --> 0:59:08.840
<v Speaker 1>worry about it quite a bit. So we worry, you know,

0:59:09.280 --> 0:59:11.920
<v Speaker 1>about things that we've already discussed here today, like if

0:59:12.000 --> 0:59:16.000
<v Speaker 1>social media is addictive, it's especially going to affect teenagers

0:59:16.120 --> 0:59:18.640
<v Speaker 1>due to the social pressures to be involved in it.

0:59:19.040 --> 0:59:22.360
<v Speaker 1>And as we learned previously, a study has shown that

0:59:22.520 --> 0:59:26.240
<v Speaker 1>this could be damaging teenagers sleep and increasing their risk

0:59:26.320 --> 0:59:30.960
<v Speaker 1>for anxiety and depression. So teenagers require more sleep than adults,

0:59:31.000 --> 0:59:34.280
<v Speaker 1>which we know this, so waking up to use social

0:59:34.320 --> 0:59:36.360
<v Speaker 1>media in the middle of the night is actually really

0:59:36.480 --> 0:59:39.080
<v Speaker 1>bad for their health and this can subsequently lead to

0:59:39.240 --> 0:59:43.640
<v Speaker 1>cold's flu and even gastro and nitas. Another study that

0:59:43.800 --> 0:59:47.360
<v Speaker 1>was done by Britain's National Citizens Service says that teenage

0:59:47.480 --> 0:59:52.120
<v Speaker 1>girls seek comfort on social media instead of from their family,

0:59:52.720 --> 0:59:56.840
<v Speaker 1>So this suggests that they experience more stress more often

0:59:56.920 --> 0:59:59.600
<v Speaker 1>than teenage boys don't do. And that kind of lines

0:59:59.680 --> 1:00:01.600
<v Speaker 1>up with a Pew research stuff that we were talking

1:00:01.640 --> 1:00:04.480
<v Speaker 1>about earlier as well. Yeah, I mean I remember in

1:00:04.560 --> 1:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>high school just watching like, you know, six hour blocks

1:00:08.000 --> 1:00:12.360
<v Speaker 1>of of television and that was kind of my coping mechanism.

1:00:13.000 --> 1:00:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Um and and playing magic the gathering. Now you do

1:00:16.280 --> 1:00:20.240
<v Speaker 1>all of that online, um M, you could do both online,

1:00:20.400 --> 1:00:24.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah at the same time. Probably. Now where are you

1:00:24.600 --> 1:00:28.400
<v Speaker 1>touched on, you know, cultivation theory and the and in

1:00:28.520 --> 1:00:32.600
<v Speaker 1>the way that the are cultivated ideas of reality then

1:00:33.240 --> 1:00:37.080
<v Speaker 1>manifest in our our own anxieties. Uh, there's a there's

1:00:37.080 --> 1:00:39.160
<v Speaker 1>a spin on it. That's often referred to as thin

1:00:39.320 --> 1:00:43.280
<v Speaker 1>World syndrome. Uh And in particular, there was an article

1:00:43.360 --> 1:00:47.200
<v Speaker 1>two thousand three the effects of thin ideal television commercials

1:00:47.240 --> 1:00:53.320
<v Speaker 1>embodied U dissatisfaction and schema activation during early Adolescence published

1:00:53.360 --> 1:00:56.920
<v Speaker 1>in the Journal of Youth and Adolescence by Dwayne Hargrives

1:00:57.040 --> 1:01:01.480
<v Speaker 1>and uh Marika Tigerman. And. In the study, they presented

1:01:01.560 --> 1:01:04.040
<v Speaker 1>two groups of girls with different sets of ads, once

1:01:04.440 --> 1:01:07.920
<v Speaker 1>set with the undernourished women and one set without. So

1:01:08.160 --> 1:01:10.200
<v Speaker 1>the results saw that girls who saw the ads with

1:01:10.280 --> 1:01:14.560
<v Speaker 1>the emaciated models experienced immediate episodes of insecurity and distress

1:01:14.600 --> 1:01:17.880
<v Speaker 1>about their weight. What's more, two years later, those same

1:01:17.960 --> 1:01:21.800
<v Speaker 1>girls still reported greater dissatisfaction with their bodies as compared

1:01:21.840 --> 1:01:25.520
<v Speaker 1>to other groups of girls. Continued exposure to unrealistic body

1:01:25.600 --> 1:01:28.600
<v Speaker 1>types in the media affected the girls perceptions about what

1:01:28.680 --> 1:01:31.960
<v Speaker 1>a normal, healthy human female body looks like. So again,

1:01:32.000 --> 1:01:36.200
<v Speaker 1>if the idea that the media is cultivating our understanding

1:01:36.200 --> 1:01:38.439
<v Speaker 1>of reality, our expectations for self and in this case,

1:01:38.480 --> 1:01:42.520
<v Speaker 1>what a normal body looks like. And and it's certainly

1:01:42.600 --> 1:01:45.600
<v Speaker 1>that I think that the evidence indicates that the case

1:01:45.680 --> 1:01:48.960
<v Speaker 1>is stronger with with females, but that you also see

1:01:49.040 --> 1:01:52.240
<v Speaker 1>varying levels of this with with males as well, because

1:01:52.280 --> 1:01:55.240
<v Speaker 1>there's still there's still very much this, uh, this vision

1:01:55.360 --> 1:01:57.600
<v Speaker 1>of of what the perfect male body looks like, and

1:01:57.720 --> 1:02:00.640
<v Speaker 1>it's out there and it maybe isn't as it's not

1:02:00.760 --> 1:02:03.200
<v Speaker 1>stressed as much as the female model, but it is

1:02:03.280 --> 1:02:05.520
<v Speaker 1>there and there are people that they have been out

1:02:05.560 --> 1:02:09.120
<v Speaker 1>of shape over it. I was actually talking about that

1:02:09.240 --> 1:02:11.840
<v Speaker 1>we were preparing for this episode with our colleagues from

1:02:11.880 --> 1:02:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Stuff Mom and Ever told You, and they mentioned to me, oh, yeah,

1:02:14.680 --> 1:02:19.040
<v Speaker 1>we've done episodes relating to this before, and they said, yeah,

1:02:19.360 --> 1:02:22.040
<v Speaker 1>one study they came across and I definitely would recommend

1:02:22.080 --> 1:02:25.120
<v Speaker 1>going and seeking out this podcast on their site. Uh

1:02:25.400 --> 1:02:29.120
<v Speaker 1>found that the exactly what you're talking about with television

1:02:29.160 --> 1:02:33.440
<v Speaker 1>ads and comparison of body types is actually worse on

1:02:33.680 --> 1:02:36.720
<v Speaker 1>Facebook for people because they're comparing their body types to

1:02:36.800 --> 1:02:39.800
<v Speaker 1>people they know in the real world and it's easier

1:02:39.880 --> 1:02:43.600
<v Speaker 1>for them to create a disassociation. Still happens, but a

1:02:43.680 --> 1:02:48.440
<v Speaker 1>disassociation from models that they've never met before versus people

1:02:48.480 --> 1:02:51.120
<v Speaker 1>in their real life when they're looking at their collections

1:02:51.120 --> 1:02:56.560
<v Speaker 1>of photos. Okay, so this all this stuff is going on,

1:02:56.680 --> 1:02:59.240
<v Speaker 1>We're all stressed out. We're all anxious, our self esteems

1:02:59.320 --> 1:03:02.120
<v Speaker 1>low or depres rest. We're trying to deal with it.

1:03:02.240 --> 1:03:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Maybe social media is helping, maybe it's making it worse.

1:03:05.520 --> 1:03:09.480
<v Speaker 1>What are some coping mechanisms? What can we do? Yeah,

1:03:09.520 --> 1:03:12.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean the terrible thing is that a lot of

1:03:12.560 --> 1:03:15.080
<v Speaker 1>times the social media is the coping method because we

1:03:15.160 --> 1:03:18.320
<v Speaker 1>have this environment and then something bad happens. Right, there's

1:03:18.320 --> 1:03:21.000
<v Speaker 1>a terrorist attack, there's a match shooting, there's political unrefts,

1:03:21.000 --> 1:03:24.880
<v Speaker 1>there's a disaster, uh, be it local or larger in scale,

1:03:25.040 --> 1:03:28.080
<v Speaker 1>and we take to social media. Well. I think one

1:03:28.120 --> 1:03:31.520
<v Speaker 1>of the best localized examples is that you if you

1:03:31.600 --> 1:03:34.560
<v Speaker 1>hear gunshots in your neighborhood, what do you do you

1:03:35.520 --> 1:03:38.400
<v Speaker 1>in around here, you often head to the local neighborhood

1:03:38.400 --> 1:03:42.440
<v Speaker 1>association Facebook group and start asking questions, Hey, what's happening?

1:03:42.520 --> 1:03:45.360
<v Speaker 1>What's going on? Someone tell me, Yeah, I don't know

1:03:45.400 --> 1:03:48.520
<v Speaker 1>about other cities, but here in Atlanta. And this is

1:03:48.600 --> 1:03:51.360
<v Speaker 1>no slight to our news organizations, but we don't really

1:03:51.440 --> 1:03:54.280
<v Speaker 1>have reliable news sources that can very quickly tell you

1:03:54.440 --> 1:03:57.120
<v Speaker 1>what's happening on the ground, especially in your neighborhood. Yeah,

1:03:57.120 --> 1:03:59.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the the Atlanta Journal Constitution is great, but

1:04:00.080 --> 1:04:01.800
<v Speaker 1>they're not going to have an up the minute story

1:04:01.880 --> 1:04:04.080
<v Speaker 1>about the noise you just heard that it was just

1:04:04.120 --> 1:04:08.240
<v Speaker 1>a transformer exploding, especially and and not a Transformer robot.

1:04:08.440 --> 1:04:10.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I would hope they would really pick up

1:04:10.680 --> 1:04:14.880
<v Speaker 1>on trans But this is especially true if you hear gunshots,

1:04:14.920 --> 1:04:17.080
<v Speaker 1>which unfortunately, I guess you're getting a little insight into

1:04:17.120 --> 1:04:19.400
<v Speaker 1>what the neighborhoods are, like the Robert and I live in.

1:04:19.920 --> 1:04:23.720
<v Speaker 1>But uh uh, for me personally, when we hear gunshots,

1:04:23.960 --> 1:04:27.040
<v Speaker 1>we turned, like you said, to Facebook or next door

1:04:27.640 --> 1:04:30.439
<v Speaker 1>is the thing. And in fact, I finally, after doing

1:04:30.440 --> 1:04:32.400
<v Speaker 1>all the research on this, I was like, all right,

1:04:32.440 --> 1:04:34.480
<v Speaker 1>I gotta sign up for next door and so I

1:04:34.560 --> 1:04:37.520
<v Speaker 1>can go to my neighbors to find out information. And

1:04:37.640 --> 1:04:40.440
<v Speaker 1>this is just one example of how social media is

1:04:40.720 --> 1:04:45.760
<v Speaker 1>replacing our investment in journalism. Right, we're defunding journalism and

1:04:45.840 --> 1:04:48.360
<v Speaker 1>instead we're turning again, like I called it, user generated

1:04:48.440 --> 1:04:51.560
<v Speaker 1>content earlier. I don't know if my neighbor down the

1:04:51.600 --> 1:04:53.840
<v Speaker 1>street actually knows if it's a gunshot or not, but

1:04:53.880 --> 1:04:56.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go to next door dot com and see

1:04:56.320 --> 1:04:58.360
<v Speaker 1>what he has to say about it, you know. Yeah,

1:04:58.560 --> 1:05:02.640
<v Speaker 1>uh so yeah, it's the confusing time. And all this

1:05:02.800 --> 1:05:07.640
<v Speaker 1>is coming from a biologically authentic place. We're biologically hardwired

1:05:07.680 --> 1:05:11.040
<v Speaker 1>to try to understand and control our environment. We need

1:05:11.120 --> 1:05:12.960
<v Speaker 1>to know what's happening. We need to know the extent

1:05:13.040 --> 1:05:15.800
<v Speaker 1>of the threat to us personally, to our family, our friends,

1:05:16.000 --> 1:05:18.920
<v Speaker 1>and they figure out what to do next. But it

1:05:19.080 --> 1:05:22.880
<v Speaker 1>often means that in our media age, and this entails

1:05:23.080 --> 1:05:27.320
<v Speaker 1>certainly television news as well as uh as social media,

1:05:27.520 --> 1:05:31.560
<v Speaker 1>but we end up binging on the chaos and disturbing details. Uh.

1:05:32.080 --> 1:05:34.680
<v Speaker 1>You know that often just come detail after detail, right

1:05:35.160 --> 1:05:38.520
<v Speaker 1>uh Um. We also binge on the compassion that spins

1:05:38.560 --> 1:05:40.600
<v Speaker 1>out of it, also on the hate that spins out

1:05:40.640 --> 1:05:43.200
<v Speaker 1>of it. Uh. And all the while we're trying to

1:05:43.320 --> 1:05:46.120
<v Speaker 1>we're absorbing the fear, the anxiety, the story of the violence,

1:05:46.160 --> 1:05:48.640
<v Speaker 1>and it brings it brings me back to the mean

1:05:48.680 --> 1:05:52.920
<v Speaker 1>world syndrome which we mentioned earlier. So while while Gardner's

1:05:53.000 --> 1:05:55.680
<v Speaker 1>work centered around TV that the Internet is an even

1:05:55.760 --> 1:05:59.840
<v Speaker 1>more powerful media fund. It just accelerates the news cycle

1:05:59.880 --> 1:06:05.800
<v Speaker 1>and allows title pools of hermetically sealed extremism overreaction hate.

1:06:06.280 --> 1:06:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Uh you can, you can. In a way, it's like

1:06:08.720 --> 1:06:11.800
<v Speaker 1>a purification of it. It's it's it's it's uh. Um,

1:06:11.920 --> 1:06:16.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's completely distilled into a sticky paste. Yeah. Yeah,

1:06:16.760 --> 1:06:21.560
<v Speaker 1>and outright false information served up hot and steaming, just

1:06:21.680 --> 1:06:23.760
<v Speaker 1>the way we like it. Yeah. As you mentioned at

1:06:23.760 --> 1:06:26.680
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of the episode, this is a major debate

1:06:26.760 --> 1:06:30.160
<v Speaker 1>that's going on through uh digital media news right now

1:06:30.280 --> 1:06:34.520
<v Speaker 1>about the election in itself. Was it affected by false news? Yeah?

1:06:34.560 --> 1:06:36.240
<v Speaker 1>And this is a top this is a topic that's

1:06:36.480 --> 1:06:39.200
<v Speaker 1>it's being discussed right now, even like Facebook is putting

1:06:39.240 --> 1:06:41.280
<v Speaker 1>out new responses. So there's no way we're gonna be

1:06:41.400 --> 1:06:45.160
<v Speaker 1>up to the minute on this story. But uh, I

1:06:45.320 --> 1:06:48.640
<v Speaker 1>was just reading a New York Times article, uh that

1:06:48.800 --> 1:06:50.480
<v Speaker 1>that that came out in the wake of the election

1:06:50.560 --> 1:06:53.200
<v Speaker 1>said that forty percent of American voters used Facebook to

1:06:53.240 --> 1:06:56.280
<v Speaker 1>get their news. And Facebook, Uh, no matter, you know,

1:06:56.400 --> 1:06:58.880
<v Speaker 1>no matter what else it is, it's important to realize

1:06:58.880 --> 1:07:01.520
<v Speaker 1>that it is not a journal the stick organization. Yeah,

1:07:02.000 --> 1:07:05.120
<v Speaker 1>I really want to spell this out for you out there,

1:07:05.800 --> 1:07:08.480
<v Speaker 1>so our show stuff to blow your mind. We're a

1:07:08.600 --> 1:07:11.720
<v Speaker 1>part of a digital media organization, and in the last

1:07:11.800 --> 1:07:15.920
<v Speaker 1>three years we've had to completely change our business approach

1:07:16.000 --> 1:07:18.600
<v Speaker 1>because of the shift from what is called organic reach

1:07:18.680 --> 1:07:21.040
<v Speaker 1>which was basically like people going into Google and typing

1:07:21.080 --> 1:07:25.520
<v Speaker 1>in stuff to blow your mind. Social media to social

1:07:25.640 --> 1:07:29.120
<v Speaker 1>media reach, most people are just getting their information from

1:07:29.160 --> 1:07:31.800
<v Speaker 1>social media now rather than going out and searching for it.

1:07:32.280 --> 1:07:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Like it or not. Facebook is not only changing the

1:07:34.680 --> 1:07:37.200
<v Speaker 1>way that we're consuming news, but it's also changing the

1:07:37.280 --> 1:07:40.160
<v Speaker 1>way that news is made. Right, So think about these

1:07:40.240 --> 1:07:43.240
<v Speaker 1>organizations like ours. In order to survive, they need to

1:07:44.240 --> 1:07:49.440
<v Speaker 1>curate for that medium, and so they're doing a variety

1:07:49.480 --> 1:07:52.720
<v Speaker 1>of things to make them fit in better with Facebook. Right. Uh,

1:07:53.000 --> 1:07:55.280
<v Speaker 1>think about this the next time that you click on

1:07:55.360 --> 1:07:59.040
<v Speaker 1>a news feed in your article, and also in that

1:07:59.160 --> 1:08:01.040
<v Speaker 1>same vein, I'd like to remind you this is why

1:08:01.240 --> 1:08:04.600
<v Speaker 1>there is an industry for fake news sites. They can

1:08:04.680 --> 1:08:08.560
<v Speaker 1>monetize the web traffic by manipulating the social media game.

1:08:10.160 --> 1:08:12.760
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you this, and Robert Kennon too. It's a

1:08:12.880 --> 1:08:15.360
<v Speaker 1>lot easier to write a fake news story, or even

1:08:15.400 --> 1:08:18.240
<v Speaker 1>a poorly reported news story, than it is to do

1:08:18.400 --> 1:08:22.280
<v Speaker 1>thoughtful research and critical evaluation. So for me personally, I'm

1:08:22.360 --> 1:08:25.960
<v Speaker 1>always wary of any story that comes out super fast,

1:08:26.360 --> 1:08:29.599
<v Speaker 1>even like I said, uh, whether I'm looking on Facebook

1:08:29.640 --> 1:08:32.479
<v Speaker 1>or or next door or whatever. If it's some neighbor

1:08:32.560 --> 1:08:34.680
<v Speaker 1>of mine and they're telling me something a little wary, like,

1:08:34.920 --> 1:08:37.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if that's a true, So you know,

1:08:37.840 --> 1:08:41.240
<v Speaker 1>give it some time. Uh. We we expect to have

1:08:41.400 --> 1:08:43.920
<v Speaker 1>all this knowledge, all this information at our fingertips, like

1:08:44.240 --> 1:08:47.160
<v Speaker 1>like where genies or something. Uh. And it's it's not

1:08:47.400 --> 1:08:51.320
<v Speaker 1>that simple. Um, So don't necessarily trust things that just

1:08:51.520 --> 1:08:55.720
<v Speaker 1>immediately come out, Yeah, such as and this is this

1:08:55.840 --> 1:08:57.439
<v Speaker 1>is a real one. I did not see this in

1:08:57.560 --> 1:09:01.240
<v Speaker 1>my Facebook feed, but apparently leading up to the U

1:09:01.320 --> 1:09:04.360
<v Speaker 1>s presidential election, stories were making their rounds that the

1:09:04.439 --> 1:09:07.559
<v Speaker 1>Pope u as in the the head of the Catholic Church,

1:09:08.000 --> 1:09:13.439
<v Speaker 1>that endorsed Donald Trump for president. And I don't believe

1:09:13.479 --> 1:09:16.920
<v Speaker 1>it happened. Um and uh And according to a report

1:09:17.600 --> 1:09:20.519
<v Speaker 1>in BuzzFeed News. And I know, just mentioning BuzzFeed News

1:09:20.560 --> 1:09:25.439
<v Speaker 1>in this conversation might be a little tricky, But there

1:09:25.520 --> 1:09:27.840
<v Speaker 1>was a report that a bunch of young people in

1:09:27.920 --> 1:09:31.479
<v Speaker 1>a town in Macedonia ran more than a hundred pro Trump.

1:09:31.560 --> 1:09:34.439
<v Speaker 1>But websites full of fake news and an attempt to

1:09:35.479 --> 1:09:39.439
<v Speaker 1>manipulate the US presidential election. So there's all this fake

1:09:39.520 --> 1:09:42.920
<v Speaker 1>news out here, this misinformation that is being Um that

1:09:43.120 --> 1:09:46.919
<v Speaker 1>that is going through the the curator system. The curator

1:09:47.240 --> 1:09:50.680
<v Speaker 1>is a business. The curator is not a journalistic uh

1:09:51.160 --> 1:09:55.160
<v Speaker 1>um enterprise and uh and and that can have some

1:09:55.400 --> 1:09:59.960
<v Speaker 1>very dire consequences. So Mark's upper Zuckerberg in the past

1:10:00.200 --> 1:10:02.800
<v Speaker 1>has claimed that that Facebook doesn't actually cause anyone to

1:10:02.880 --> 1:10:06.080
<v Speaker 1>make up their minds. And I'm and I'm not necessarily

1:10:06.120 --> 1:10:10.080
<v Speaker 1>suggesting that's the case either here, but Facebook's own research

1:10:10.200 --> 1:10:13.719
<v Speaker 1>suggests that it's no mere neutral arbitrator in the trade

1:10:13.760 --> 1:10:16.599
<v Speaker 1>of real or fake news. Oh yeah, sure, well, especially

1:10:16.760 --> 1:10:20.440
<v Speaker 1>again given the algorithm. We've sort of mentioned the algorithm obliquely,

1:10:20.600 --> 1:10:23.839
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, I mean the algorithm of Facebook is designed

1:10:23.920 --> 1:10:27.760
<v Speaker 1>to feed you what it thinks you want to see. Yeah,

1:10:27.920 --> 1:10:31.840
<v Speaker 1>and no matter where you stand politically, socially, what have you,

1:10:31.880 --> 1:10:34.080
<v Speaker 1>you've probably come up against the algorithm and ask, huh,

1:10:34.240 --> 1:10:36.160
<v Speaker 1>why am I seeing this? Why am I not saying

1:10:36.240 --> 1:10:40.040
<v Speaker 1>that two thousand and ten experiment with go vote boxes

1:10:40.479 --> 1:10:43.240
<v Speaker 1>with or without photos of friends who voted is one

1:10:43.280 --> 1:10:45.640
<v Speaker 1>of the studies that comes up. The second version, the

1:10:45.720 --> 1:10:49.200
<v Speaker 1>one with people actually turned out hundreds of thousands of

1:10:49.479 --> 1:10:54.160
<v Speaker 1>voters in this particular exercise. Then in twelve they secretly

1:10:54.320 --> 1:10:57.360
<v Speaker 1>tweaked the news feed, so that some users experienced slightly

1:10:57.439 --> 1:11:00.880
<v Speaker 1>more positive or negative streams, and the nature of those

1:11:00.920 --> 1:11:04.000
<v Speaker 1>streams influenced the nature of the user's own posts. So

1:11:04.479 --> 1:11:09.040
<v Speaker 1>negativity begot negativity, positivity begot positivity, which ties in with

1:11:09.120 --> 1:11:12.040
<v Speaker 1>some of the things we've been discussing here. Yeah. Um,

1:11:12.200 --> 1:11:14.639
<v Speaker 1>and I'm seeing this play out in my own Facebook

1:11:14.760 --> 1:11:16.880
<v Speaker 1>feed right now. There's a lot of people talking about

1:11:17.040 --> 1:11:21.480
<v Speaker 1>the quote echo chamber effect of social media, especially on Facebook,

1:11:21.880 --> 1:11:25.360
<v Speaker 1>that could have contributed to decision making for the election.

1:11:25.800 --> 1:11:28.360
<v Speaker 1>But also I believe it's the Wall Street Journal, is

1:11:28.400 --> 1:11:30.800
<v Speaker 1>that right, who has created this filter that allows you

1:11:30.920 --> 1:11:34.800
<v Speaker 1>to see what a Facebook feed would be like if

1:11:34.880 --> 1:11:38.200
<v Speaker 1>it was curated on like a quote unquote liberal algorithm

1:11:38.360 --> 1:11:41.240
<v Speaker 1>versus a conservative algorithm that's been shown up in my

1:11:41.360 --> 1:11:43.960
<v Speaker 1>feed as well. Links over to that. Well, there's a

1:11:44.000 --> 1:11:45.600
<v Speaker 1>piece that came out in the New York Times just

1:11:45.760 --> 1:11:47.200
<v Speaker 1>last week, so I guess it'll be like two weeks

1:11:47.200 --> 1:11:49.280
<v Speaker 1>ago by the time this episode comes out, And it's

1:11:49.320 --> 1:11:53.920
<v Speaker 1>from Za Nip to Feci and U two faccy rights

1:11:54.400 --> 1:11:56.479
<v Speaker 1>and the dangers of Facebook's current set up are not

1:11:56.560 --> 1:11:58.760
<v Speaker 1>limited to the United States. The effects can be even

1:11:58.840 --> 1:12:01.760
<v Speaker 1>more calamitous and countries with fewer checks and balances and

1:12:01.800 --> 1:12:05.240
<v Speaker 1>weaker institutions in independent media. In Mayan, mar for example,

1:12:05.320 --> 1:12:09.280
<v Speaker 1>misinformation on Facebook has reportedly helped fuel ethnic cleansing, creating

1:12:09.280 --> 1:12:12.920
<v Speaker 1>an enormous refugee crisis. Facebook may want to claim that

1:12:13.040 --> 1:12:15.720
<v Speaker 1>it is remaining neutral, but that is a false and

1:12:15.840 --> 1:12:19.719
<v Speaker 1>dangerous stance. The company's business model, algorithms, and policies entrenched

1:12:19.800 --> 1:12:24.280
<v Speaker 1>echo chambers and fuel the spread of misinformation. I mean

1:12:24.400 --> 1:12:26.920
<v Speaker 1>that that really strikes you right there. Like it's one

1:12:27.000 --> 1:12:29.479
<v Speaker 1>thing to say, like, oh, well this quote echo chamber

1:12:30.160 --> 1:12:33.400
<v Speaker 1>affected how people voted, But then when you hear well

1:12:33.479 --> 1:12:36.760
<v Speaker 1>this could have affected ethnic cleansing, you know, I mean

1:12:36.840 --> 1:12:42.960
<v Speaker 1>that's heartbreaking. Yeah. Uh. In December of will Or Amous

1:12:43.120 --> 1:12:46.160
<v Speaker 1>of Slate reached out to Facebook about the spread of

1:12:46.200 --> 1:12:50.560
<v Speaker 1>false information on Facebook and reported the following quote. I

1:12:50.680 --> 1:12:53.519
<v Speaker 1>ran this idea by Greg Mara, a Facebook news feed

1:12:53.560 --> 1:12:56.880
<v Speaker 1>product manager, in a recent conversation about another of the

1:12:56.920 --> 1:12:59.680
<v Speaker 1>company's efforts to improve the quality of users feeds. He

1:12:59.760 --> 1:13:02.559
<v Speaker 1>saw it vaguely intrigued, but said his team probably wouldn't

1:13:02.560 --> 1:13:05.960
<v Speaker 1>be making it a priority anytime soon. Quote. We haven't

1:13:06.000 --> 1:13:10.200
<v Speaker 1>tried to do anything around objective truth. Mar amused, It's

1:13:10.240 --> 1:13:13.160
<v Speaker 1>a complicated topic and probably not the first thing we

1:13:13.240 --> 1:13:18.000
<v Speaker 1>would bite off. So yeah, objective truth. Yeah yeah, why

1:13:18.160 --> 1:13:20.960
<v Speaker 1>why get involved in that? Uh? And then uh. I

1:13:21.000 --> 1:13:23.639
<v Speaker 1>also ran across an excellent piece in Ian magazine from

1:13:23.720 --> 1:13:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Liz Lenz and they shared the following quote. Facts are

1:13:27.040 --> 1:13:29.759
<v Speaker 1>at our fingertips, but instead of liberating us, they seem

1:13:29.840 --> 1:13:33.280
<v Speaker 1>to become a casualty in the war of ideas. My

1:13:33.439 --> 1:13:37.479
<v Speaker 1>husband has an aphorism that states, if you google long enough,

1:13:37.680 --> 1:13:43.680
<v Speaker 1>anything becomes the truth. That's nice. I like that. Uh.

1:13:44.160 --> 1:13:47.160
<v Speaker 1>And none of this even takes into account the rise

1:13:47.280 --> 1:13:50.840
<v Speaker 1>of bullying and trolling on social media. We're just talking

1:13:50.880 --> 1:13:54.280
<v Speaker 1>about the mental health issues that are brought to it originally,

1:13:54.360 --> 1:13:56.280
<v Speaker 1>not even the ones that are that are coming out

1:13:56.360 --> 1:13:59.360
<v Speaker 1>of it. The majority of those on social media are

1:13:59.479 --> 1:14:03.200
<v Speaker 1>under third two years old, and most of those are adolescent. Now.

1:14:03.520 --> 1:14:08.960
<v Speaker 1>The Enough is Enough organization reports that of teenagers who

1:14:09.160 --> 1:14:12.960
<v Speaker 1>have used social media have witnessed cyber bullying. And I

1:14:13.040 --> 1:14:15.960
<v Speaker 1>just want to give a personal aside about our work.

1:14:16.040 --> 1:14:19.160
<v Speaker 1>This isn't a SOB story, but um, given what we

1:14:19.400 --> 1:14:23.519
<v Speaker 1>do and how Facebook and Twitter and YouTube, I'll play

1:14:23.560 --> 1:14:26.439
<v Speaker 1>into our you know, our business, not just stuff to

1:14:26.479 --> 1:14:28.680
<v Speaker 1>blow your mind, but how stuff works in general. We

1:14:28.840 --> 1:14:33.320
<v Speaker 1>see a lot of cyber bullying and trolling, especially targeted

1:14:33.560 --> 1:14:40.120
<v Speaker 1>at our hosts on various shows. Video, Uh, definitely on Facebook.

1:14:40.640 --> 1:14:44.479
<v Speaker 1>And it's um, it's tough, you know, and it's it's

1:14:44.600 --> 1:14:48.320
<v Speaker 1>something that kind of comes along with this gig that

1:14:48.520 --> 1:14:50.960
<v Speaker 1>not a lot of people think about, Like the emotional

1:14:51.080 --> 1:14:54.720
<v Speaker 1>toll of constantly seeing people tell you I don't like

1:14:54.800 --> 1:14:57.400
<v Speaker 1>the way you move your hands or your hair is stupid.

1:14:58.040 --> 1:15:00.519
<v Speaker 1>These are things that I get as a man. Our

1:15:00.640 --> 1:15:07.599
<v Speaker 1>female colleagues get horrific abuse by trolls on the internet. Now,

1:15:09.000 --> 1:15:10.840
<v Speaker 1>how do you cope with that? How do you cope

1:15:10.880 --> 1:15:12.760
<v Speaker 1>with all of this? I often say, like, man, I

1:15:12.840 --> 1:15:17.040
<v Speaker 1>wish we just had like a counselor Troy here in

1:15:17.120 --> 1:15:19.160
<v Speaker 1>the office that we could go to to talk about

1:15:19.200 --> 1:15:23.120
<v Speaker 1>this stuff. Um, is it realistic to just go completely

1:15:23.200 --> 1:15:26.439
<v Speaker 1>cold turkey off of social media? Well after the election,

1:15:26.520 --> 1:15:30.400
<v Speaker 1>the Seattle Times actually interviewed one of their local mental

1:15:30.479 --> 1:15:34.720
<v Speaker 1>health counselors and several social media experts for how you

1:15:34.880 --> 1:15:37.920
<v Speaker 1>can set boundaries. So these are a couple of things,

1:15:38.000 --> 1:15:39.479
<v Speaker 1>And I'm also going to add in here that the

1:15:39.520 --> 1:15:44.800
<v Speaker 1>American Psychological Association says that fifty of adults expressed that

1:15:44.880 --> 1:15:47.640
<v Speaker 1>they felt stress related to the campaign. If that is

1:15:47.680 --> 1:15:52.160
<v Speaker 1>the case, experts then recommend limiting social media engagement and

1:15:52.280 --> 1:15:55.240
<v Speaker 1>definitely limiting engagement with the twenty four our news cycle.

1:15:55.760 --> 1:15:57.800
<v Speaker 1>But hey, like we said before, some people turn to

1:15:57.880 --> 1:16:01.800
<v Speaker 1>social media for support or to offer it, especially for

1:16:01.960 --> 1:16:06.000
<v Speaker 1>those who are already suffering from addiction, depression, or anxiety. Right,

1:16:06.080 --> 1:16:09.479
<v Speaker 1>so here's a couple of tips. One is, ask yourself

1:16:09.520 --> 1:16:12.880
<v Speaker 1>if you really need to log in? Right. I found

1:16:12.880 --> 1:16:15.160
<v Speaker 1>myself doing this today where I was just like sitting

1:16:15.200 --> 1:16:16.680
<v Speaker 1>there kind of hanging out with my dogs, and I

1:16:17.240 --> 1:16:19.599
<v Speaker 1>popped Twitter on and I was like, I don't need

1:16:19.640 --> 1:16:21.760
<v Speaker 1>to do that. I'm just I'm just doing it out

1:16:21.800 --> 1:16:24.080
<v Speaker 1>of habit. We'll log in. Is an interesting thing to

1:16:24.120 --> 1:16:27.200
<v Speaker 1>bring up here because log in and and it brings

1:16:27.240 --> 1:16:30.000
<v Speaker 1>the mind the idea that you're actually inputting your password. There,

1:16:30.080 --> 1:16:32.800
<v Speaker 1>you're sticking a key into the horrible box that you

1:16:32.920 --> 1:16:38.000
<v Speaker 1>keep under your bed umu. And either either way, like

1:16:38.240 --> 1:16:40.599
<v Speaker 1>this is the decision to unlock, it is in play.

1:16:41.040 --> 1:16:44.520
<v Speaker 1>But for the most like our browsers remember our passwords.

1:16:44.640 --> 1:16:47.000
<v Speaker 1>It's like the it's just this thing you do. I mean,

1:16:47.080 --> 1:16:51.160
<v Speaker 1>how many times have have have you the listeners found

1:16:51.160 --> 1:16:53.400
<v Speaker 1>yourself just at the site that you go to every day.

1:16:53.400 --> 1:16:55.439
<v Speaker 1>It's just like a muscle memory thing. And then you're there,

1:16:55.479 --> 1:16:57.200
<v Speaker 1>you're reading it. You're like, what am I even doing here?

1:16:57.240 --> 1:16:59.000
<v Speaker 1>I was here five minutes ago. There's not even any

1:16:59.040 --> 1:17:04.240
<v Speaker 1>new content to look exactly. Yeah. Uh so just think

1:17:04.280 --> 1:17:05.880
<v Speaker 1>to yourself. And I've been doing this in the last

1:17:05.920 --> 1:17:08.599
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks. Maybe there's something else you can do. Right.

1:17:09.040 --> 1:17:11.360
<v Speaker 1>For instance, I've been listening to music a lot more

1:17:12.240 --> 1:17:15.559
<v Speaker 1>rather than going on to social media. I I finally

1:17:15.640 --> 1:17:18.000
<v Speaker 1>invested in one of those subscription services, and I'm just

1:17:18.120 --> 1:17:19.920
<v Speaker 1>listening to a lot of new music and listening to

1:17:19.960 --> 1:17:22.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of music old music from when I was

1:17:22.160 --> 1:17:24.800
<v Speaker 1>a teenager that I don't have anymore. And it's just

1:17:24.920 --> 1:17:27.920
<v Speaker 1>been that's been very helpful. Maybe you could play a

1:17:28.000 --> 1:17:32.479
<v Speaker 1>video game, you know, uh, or hey, here's a novel,

1:17:32.520 --> 1:17:37.320
<v Speaker 1>idea exercise, or call a friend up you know, I

1:17:37.439 --> 1:17:39.080
<v Speaker 1>have a friend. A number of these can be done

1:17:39.080 --> 1:17:41.519
<v Speaker 1>at the same time. Yeah, I mean, I could play

1:17:41.640 --> 1:17:44.160
<v Speaker 1>video games and talk to my friends at the same time.

1:17:44.240 --> 1:17:47.720
<v Speaker 1>That's often how I have phone calls with them. But

1:17:48.600 --> 1:17:51.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, so that's one thing is like just always,

1:17:51.840 --> 1:17:53.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, ask yourself, do I need to be doing this?

1:17:54.400 --> 1:17:56.360
<v Speaker 1>Then here's the thing. If you're still going to use

1:17:56.439 --> 1:18:01.560
<v Speaker 1>electronic devices, prioritize which sites are important to you, and

1:18:01.720 --> 1:18:04.639
<v Speaker 1>then set a time limit for yourself to log off.

1:18:04.720 --> 1:18:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Don't just scan where we I do this so often,

1:18:07.439 --> 1:18:09.280
<v Speaker 1>especially given the nature of our work where I'm just

1:18:09.760 --> 1:18:14.320
<v Speaker 1>scrolling and scrolling and scrolling and looking for the next fix. Right,

1:18:15.520 --> 1:18:17.920
<v Speaker 1>I'd also throw in turn off those updates if you don't,

1:18:18.960 --> 1:18:21.639
<v Speaker 1>I've already yeah, I don't have any of that stuff.

1:18:22.360 --> 1:18:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Decide how much time in your day is devoted to

1:18:25.520 --> 1:18:28.600
<v Speaker 1>consuming news and whatever form, whether that's social media or

1:18:28.680 --> 1:18:32.479
<v Speaker 1>on television. If you're really committed to getting a fix

1:18:32.600 --> 1:18:37.560
<v Speaker 1>of news, look for well written, well reported articles, especially

1:18:37.680 --> 1:18:40.639
<v Speaker 1>by someone who has views that oppose your own. Okay,

1:18:41.320 --> 1:18:45.759
<v Speaker 1>try thinking from another person's perspective, even if you totally

1:18:45.840 --> 1:18:48.720
<v Speaker 1>disagree with them. If it's well written enough, it'll at

1:18:48.760 --> 1:18:54.160
<v Speaker 1>least give you pause for consideration. Uh. Also decide what

1:18:54.320 --> 1:18:57.160
<v Speaker 1>to keep out of your feed, right, skip past the

1:18:57.240 --> 1:19:00.760
<v Speaker 1>disturbing images or video h stuff that's in your feed.

1:19:00.960 --> 1:19:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Acknowledge that some people are more important to you than others.

1:19:04.760 --> 1:19:07.719
<v Speaker 1>So you know who to respond to and who to ignore.

1:19:08.400 --> 1:19:10.240
<v Speaker 1>And you can always, as I mentioned at the top,

1:19:10.320 --> 1:19:14.960
<v Speaker 1>as I do quietly unfollowed or unfriend people. I use

1:19:15.080 --> 1:19:17.840
<v Speaker 1>lists for this on Twitter. It's great cure. Eight year

1:19:17.920 --> 1:19:21.120
<v Speaker 1>feed You've become responsible for it yourself, and it's um,

1:19:21.320 --> 1:19:23.360
<v Speaker 1>it's just better for your mental health overall. Yeah, and

1:19:23.400 --> 1:19:26.080
<v Speaker 1>I want to drive home to that again. Remember that

1:19:26.400 --> 1:19:29.800
<v Speaker 1>the person that an individual is online on Facebook, it's

1:19:29.840 --> 1:19:31.880
<v Speaker 1>not the sum total of who they are. That's just

1:19:32.040 --> 1:19:35.439
<v Speaker 1>one aspect of their person. And so there there there

1:19:35.520 --> 1:19:38.679
<v Speaker 1>may be situations where you say, you know, I'm still

1:19:38.760 --> 1:19:41.840
<v Speaker 1>totally friends with this person, but you know, maybe all

1:19:41.920 --> 1:19:45.160
<v Speaker 1>they do is share turn up recipes on their Facebook

1:19:45.600 --> 1:19:48.120
<v Speaker 1>and you love them, but you're just not into turn

1:19:48.200 --> 1:19:51.120
<v Speaker 1>ups and you're not into turn up recipes, so maybe

1:19:51.439 --> 1:19:53.920
<v Speaker 1>this is just not the platform where your friendship exists.

1:19:54.120 --> 1:19:58.680
<v Speaker 1>I absolutely have relationships like that. Uh. And look, if

1:19:58.720 --> 1:20:01.920
<v Speaker 1>you've got to engage with people, try to do it positively,

1:20:02.080 --> 1:20:05.519
<v Speaker 1>either like those other people's posts or share something that

1:20:05.600 --> 1:20:09.479
<v Speaker 1>you found inspiring. If it's a political matter, try using

1:20:09.520 --> 1:20:11.920
<v Speaker 1>a neutral tone. I know it's tough, right now. I

1:20:12.000 --> 1:20:14.280
<v Speaker 1>know it's real easy to say that, and it's difficult,

1:20:14.640 --> 1:20:18.439
<v Speaker 1>but present evidence based information in your post or hey,

1:20:18.560 --> 1:20:21.960
<v Speaker 1>here's something you could do. Get involved in constructive causes

1:20:22.439 --> 1:20:25.680
<v Speaker 1>by signing petitions or writing letters, or calling politicians, or

1:20:26.000 --> 1:20:28.439
<v Speaker 1>or getting involved with some local group that you support.

1:20:28.800 --> 1:20:31.439
<v Speaker 1>The first thing that I saw when I um joined

1:20:31.520 --> 1:20:34.080
<v Speaker 1>next door this morning was that there was a long

1:20:34.200 --> 1:20:37.599
<v Speaker 1>post of my neighbors talking about, Hey, what local groups

1:20:37.680 --> 1:20:40.120
<v Speaker 1>can I go out and volunteer for and get involved?

1:20:40.160 --> 1:20:42.519
<v Speaker 1>Like I feel like I need to do something. Yeah,

1:20:42.560 --> 1:20:45.160
<v Speaker 1>And that allows you to act, to to do actually

1:20:45.240 --> 1:20:50.600
<v Speaker 1>act from from a position of of of of optimism,

1:20:51.160 --> 1:20:54.920
<v Speaker 1>because it's it's difficult to act from a state of pessimism.

1:20:55.360 --> 1:20:58.360
<v Speaker 1>And the last coping mechanism I would say is don't

1:20:58.600 --> 1:21:02.040
<v Speaker 1>let yourself start worrying about something that may not have

1:21:02.160 --> 1:21:06.040
<v Speaker 1>actually even happened. Remember what we said here about false

1:21:06.160 --> 1:21:09.200
<v Speaker 1>news and rumors that spread real easily on social media.

1:21:10.040 --> 1:21:13.280
<v Speaker 1>So people have researched this. It can take fourteen hours

1:21:13.400 --> 1:21:18.479
<v Speaker 1>to debunk false claims online. So wait before you get angry,

1:21:18.720 --> 1:21:22.000
<v Speaker 1>come back, do some research, look into whether this is

1:21:22.000 --> 1:21:26.720
<v Speaker 1>a real thing or not, and then move forward and engage. Now,

1:21:27.120 --> 1:21:29.920
<v Speaker 1>let's take this and flip it on its head. What

1:21:30.040 --> 1:21:33.759
<v Speaker 1>if we used social media as a data mining tool

1:21:34.200 --> 1:21:38.320
<v Speaker 1>to assist psychologists in community health forecast. Well, that is

1:21:38.400 --> 1:21:41.760
<v Speaker 1>something that that a project called the World Well Being

1:21:41.920 --> 1:21:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Project is talking about doing. They've evaluated a hundred million

1:21:46.040 --> 1:21:50.080
<v Speaker 1>tweets and they found that the preponderance of negative tweets,

1:21:50.160 --> 1:21:54.120
<v Speaker 1>especially those with anger or hostility linked in them, reliably

1:21:54.320 --> 1:21:58.240
<v Speaker 1>predicts a rise in deaths from heart disease in their

1:21:58.320 --> 1:22:01.680
<v Speaker 1>given locations. That's crazy to me that they can look

1:22:01.720 --> 1:22:04.920
<v Speaker 1>at Twitter and say, what the death rate is going

1:22:04.960 --> 1:22:08.000
<v Speaker 1>to increase, I don't know in Chicago or something like that. Well,

1:22:08.080 --> 1:22:10.000
<v Speaker 1>it's not surprising. I want to say there was a

1:22:10.479 --> 1:22:11.920
<v Speaker 1>I wish I had the study in front of me,

1:22:11.960 --> 1:22:14.280
<v Speaker 1>but I believe there was a German study years back

1:22:14.400 --> 1:22:19.560
<v Speaker 1>looking at like high engagement soccer games or football and

1:22:20.080 --> 1:22:23.080
<v Speaker 1>in looking at rises in heart attacks or heart conditions

1:22:23.479 --> 1:22:25.720
<v Speaker 1>around that. Just the idea that here's this thing that

1:22:25.840 --> 1:22:29.200
<v Speaker 1>everyone's a number a large sections is the population are

1:22:29.240 --> 1:22:33.679
<v Speaker 1>invested in. It's right right, raising everybody's blood their heart rate,

1:22:34.280 --> 1:22:37.720
<v Speaker 1>and they're going to be physical ramifications of them. Yeah.

1:22:38.200 --> 1:22:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Google is also tried doing this in a similar way

1:22:41.720 --> 1:22:45.720
<v Speaker 1>with flu symptoms. Um, so they track in real time

1:22:45.760 --> 1:22:48.560
<v Speaker 1>the emergence of flu outbreaks. They tried doing this and

1:22:48.640 --> 1:22:52.519
<v Speaker 1>they stopped. But what if we could apply machine learning

1:22:52.640 --> 1:22:56.880
<v Speaker 1>methods to determine areas where stress, anxiety, and depression are

1:22:56.920 --> 1:23:01.440
<v Speaker 1>breaking out? We could provide those areas with more assistance theoretically,

1:23:01.600 --> 1:23:05.280
<v Speaker 1>so could we end up in a situation where negative

1:23:05.360 --> 1:23:07.880
<v Speaker 1>to too much negativity on social media it causes the

1:23:07.920 --> 1:23:11.360
<v Speaker 1>metibots to come to your house they started administering give

1:23:11.439 --> 1:23:18.800
<v Speaker 1>us impacts. Um. Okay, so we've got over a lot

1:23:18.840 --> 1:23:22.240
<v Speaker 1>of stuff with you all in this episode. Let's extrapolate

1:23:22.320 --> 1:23:25.720
<v Speaker 1>what we've learned here and take what's going on in

1:23:25.800 --> 1:23:28.519
<v Speaker 1>the world right now with social media and and just

1:23:29.520 --> 1:23:31.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, what do we get out of this? Well,

1:23:31.439 --> 1:23:34.120
<v Speaker 1>first of all, Facebook could be altering our perceptions of

1:23:34.240 --> 1:23:37.120
<v Speaker 1>people in the world right and in the sense that

1:23:37.640 --> 1:23:40.719
<v Speaker 1>we may not be getting the full story through social

1:23:40.800 --> 1:23:44.479
<v Speaker 1>media and you know, beyond mere perception. Uh, there's an

1:23:44.520 --> 1:23:48.920
<v Speaker 1>ongoing conversation to what extent is Facebook empowering the dissemination

1:23:49.120 --> 1:23:53.280
<v Speaker 1>of false information, building at times dangerous perceived realities for

1:23:53.360 --> 1:23:55.639
<v Speaker 1>its users. Again, this is something that is an ongoing

1:23:55.720 --> 1:23:58.679
<v Speaker 1>conversation and this episode is not going to be standing

1:23:58.720 --> 1:24:00.880
<v Speaker 1>on the cutting edge of that, as there's a week

1:24:00.960 --> 1:24:03.679
<v Speaker 1>delay in it coming out. Uh. And look, if you're

1:24:03.720 --> 1:24:07.320
<v Speaker 1>already anxious, using social media could make your self esteem

1:24:07.400 --> 1:24:10.680
<v Speaker 1>even worse, so consider that before you hop on. But

1:24:11.560 --> 1:24:15.920
<v Speaker 1>positive feedback to political post is only going to reinforce

1:24:16.000 --> 1:24:19.560
<v Speaker 1>your own beliefs, so it's less likely to challenge you

1:24:19.640 --> 1:24:23.559
<v Speaker 1>to think from someone else's perspective. And this, in turn,

1:24:23.800 --> 1:24:27.120
<v Speaker 1>from what we learned, becomes addictive in how it forms

1:24:27.160 --> 1:24:33.880
<v Speaker 1>our worldviews. So we're combining our political philosophical society with

1:24:34.640 --> 1:24:44.080
<v Speaker 1>have Love's reward system. And that seems dangerous. Yeah, it does. Um.

1:24:44.200 --> 1:24:46.599
<v Speaker 1>As a final note, my personal advice, get a fish tank.

1:24:46.680 --> 1:24:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Fish tanks are great, so soothing, They're so great. That

1:24:49.160 --> 1:24:50.639
<v Speaker 1>does sound nice. I don't know how I've been living

1:24:50.680 --> 1:24:52.160
<v Speaker 1>this long without a fish tank in my life, but

1:24:52.360 --> 1:24:56.479
<v Speaker 1>I'm loving it so Uh. Here on stuff to blow

1:24:56.520 --> 1:25:00.920
<v Speaker 1>your mind. We wanted to take this opportunity, uh to

1:25:01.120 --> 1:25:04.280
<v Speaker 1>advocate for a group that would be related to this,

1:25:04.760 --> 1:25:07.479
<v Speaker 1>an organization ourselves that we looked into and that we

1:25:07.560 --> 1:25:09.400
<v Speaker 1>feel like we'd like to support, and the one that

1:25:09.479 --> 1:25:13.960
<v Speaker 1>we found for this episode is called stomp Out bullying

1:25:14.200 --> 1:25:17.559
<v Speaker 1>and they're a group that is the leading national bullying

1:25:17.720 --> 1:25:21.439
<v Speaker 1>and cyber bullying prevention organization for kids and teens in

1:25:21.439 --> 1:25:25.200
<v Speaker 1>the United States. They focus on reducing and preventing these

1:25:25.320 --> 1:25:28.840
<v Speaker 1>things as well as sexting and other digital abuse. UH.

1:25:28.880 --> 1:25:34.320
<v Speaker 1>They educate, educate against homophobia, racism and hatred, decreased school

1:25:34.360 --> 1:25:38.360
<v Speaker 1>absentee ism, and deter violence in schools, online and in

1:25:38.479 --> 1:25:41.720
<v Speaker 1>communities across the country. UM. We were looking at this

1:25:41.840 --> 1:25:44.120
<v Speaker 1>this morning and it seemed like a great way to

1:25:44.680 --> 1:25:46.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you're feeling I need to do something,

1:25:46.840 --> 1:25:48.479
<v Speaker 1>this is this is something to take a look at.

1:25:48.720 --> 1:25:51.200
<v Speaker 1>They've got seven ways that you can make a difference

1:25:51.280 --> 1:25:54.080
<v Speaker 1>by by you know, working together with their group. Of course,

1:25:54.160 --> 1:25:57.479
<v Speaker 1>the easy ways you can donate give them money. UH.

1:25:57.600 --> 1:26:00.160
<v Speaker 1>You can also participate in their campaigns. They have these

1:26:00.240 --> 1:26:03.960
<v Speaker 1>various campaigns that help with bullying prevention. UM. They have

1:26:04.040 --> 1:26:07.360
<v Speaker 1>an online store where you can shop, and that's kind

1:26:07.400 --> 1:26:10.439
<v Speaker 1>of like combining the donation with getting something that you can,

1:26:10.720 --> 1:26:12.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know where, or give to somebody else out

1:26:12.920 --> 1:26:16.360
<v Speaker 1>in the real world. You can also volunteer. UH. They

1:26:16.439 --> 1:26:20.080
<v Speaker 1>actually have a help chat line and peer mentoring groups

1:26:20.160 --> 1:26:23.519
<v Speaker 1>in schools to help raise awareness about bullying, so maybe

1:26:23.520 --> 1:26:26.640
<v Speaker 1>you want to participate that way. And then finally they

1:26:26.720 --> 1:26:31.759
<v Speaker 1>partner with corporations, media, and celebrities uh to end bullying.

1:26:31.960 --> 1:26:34.840
<v Speaker 1>So if you're any of those three things, if you're

1:26:34.840 --> 1:26:38.240
<v Speaker 1>a corporation, media entity, or a celebrity of some kind,

1:26:38.360 --> 1:26:40.720
<v Speaker 1>maybe you want to participate in this. Yeah. Yeah, So

1:26:40.760 --> 1:26:42.360
<v Speaker 1>they seem like a really good group. They're doing a

1:26:42.400 --> 1:26:44.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of good work, so we wanted to highlight them

1:26:44.360 --> 1:26:46.320
<v Speaker 1>here real quick, and we would we'd like to do

1:26:46.400 --> 1:26:48.720
<v Speaker 1>more of this in the future. So if there are

1:26:48.720 --> 1:26:53.360
<v Speaker 1>any uh worthy causes out there, groups, nonprofits that are

1:26:53.479 --> 1:26:56.960
<v Speaker 1>engaged in some real positive efforts in the world, let

1:26:57.040 --> 1:26:59.320
<v Speaker 1>us know about them and uh and and we're gonna

1:26:59.439 --> 1:27:01.800
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna try and make this a regular thank here

1:27:01.840 --> 1:27:04.120
<v Speaker 1>on the show. And here's the irony of it. How

1:27:04.160 --> 1:27:07.360
<v Speaker 1>do you let us know about it? Well, social media.

1:27:08.360 --> 1:27:11.240
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, we're on Facebook, we're on Twitter, we're on Tumblr,

1:27:11.360 --> 1:27:14.360
<v Speaker 1>and we're on Instagram. We are trying to make those

1:27:14.439 --> 1:27:18.880
<v Speaker 1>positive places, uh. We do. We sometimes do live video

1:27:18.960 --> 1:27:22.519
<v Speaker 1>performances where we talk about um monster movie trailers and

1:27:22.600 --> 1:27:24.400
<v Speaker 1>how they relate to the science that we talked about

1:27:24.439 --> 1:27:26.840
<v Speaker 1>on the show. Sometimes we share links to things that

1:27:26.880 --> 1:27:30.760
<v Speaker 1>we're pretty excited about. Um. Sometimes we just share I

1:27:30.800 --> 1:27:33.519
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I like to take photos of bizarre things

1:27:33.560 --> 1:27:35.599
<v Speaker 1>that I find while we're doing research to give people

1:27:35.760 --> 1:27:38.080
<v Speaker 1>a hint as to what's coming up on the show.

1:27:38.800 --> 1:27:40.800
<v Speaker 1>But those are all places where you can reach out

1:27:40.880 --> 1:27:44.760
<v Speaker 1>to us, to talk to us about um, what we're

1:27:44.800 --> 1:27:46.800
<v Speaker 1>doing on the show, provide us with some feedback, or

1:27:47.120 --> 1:27:49.639
<v Speaker 1>like Robert said, tell us about another organization that maybe

1:27:49.680 --> 1:27:54.240
<v Speaker 1>we can promote here. Uh. The all those are in

1:27:54.360 --> 1:27:57.840
<v Speaker 1>somewhere or another. Blow the mind, yes, and I if

1:27:57.840 --> 1:27:59.160
<v Speaker 1>you want to cut all that out, just come straight

1:27:59.200 --> 1:28:01.479
<v Speaker 1>to Stuff to Blow your Mind dot com, a social

1:28:01.600 --> 1:28:04.680
<v Speaker 1>media free website as celebration of everything we do, all

1:28:04.720 --> 1:28:07.600
<v Speaker 1>the episodes, the podcast, the blog post, you name it,

1:28:07.800 --> 1:28:09.680
<v Speaker 1>it's there. There will also be links out to our

1:28:09.680 --> 1:28:11.200
<v Speaker 1>so for media accounts, but you don't have to click

1:28:11.240 --> 1:28:14.600
<v Speaker 1>on notes. You really don't. And finally, there is an

1:28:14.640 --> 1:28:16.479
<v Speaker 1>old fashioned way to get in touch with us. Uh.

1:28:16.720 --> 1:28:18.679
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not talking about finding us on the street

1:28:18.680 --> 1:28:20.920
<v Speaker 1>and talking to us, though I guess that would work.

1:28:21.000 --> 1:28:24.479
<v Speaker 1>They can use ravens Ravens, yes, owls, um, you know,

1:28:24.720 --> 1:28:27.160
<v Speaker 1>whatever you have at your disposal. But Yeah, there's the

1:28:27.200 --> 1:28:30.040
<v Speaker 1>email address. Yeah, that's blow the mind at how stuff

1:28:30.040 --> 1:28:41.320
<v Speaker 1>works dot com for more on this and thousands of

1:28:41.360 --> 1:29:00.040
<v Speaker 1>other topics. Is that how stuff works dot com. The

1:29:00.280 --> 1:29:03.800
<v Speaker 1>homographic artises found back by