WEBVTT - The Real Tea with Annie Costabile

0:00:00.720 --> 0:00:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Good Game with Sarah Spain, where we're considering

0:00:03.400 --> 0:00:06.440
<v Speaker 1>dyeing our hair bright pink to match the stud buds.

0:00:07.000 --> 0:00:07.920
<v Speaker 2>Can we pull it off?

0:00:08.520 --> 0:00:10.799
<v Speaker 1>It's Thursday, July twelfth, and on today's show, we'll be

0:00:10.840 --> 0:00:14.000
<v Speaker 1>chatting with Annie Costable, now a front office sports, about

0:00:14.000 --> 0:00:17.280
<v Speaker 1>our new gig, the biggest surprises so far this WNBA season,

0:00:17.680 --> 0:00:21.360
<v Speaker 1>and the historic tea that fuels today's rivalries. Plus a

0:00:21.400 --> 0:00:24.440
<v Speaker 1>reminder that your fandom comes with a side of civic duty.

0:00:24.840 --> 0:00:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Is TBA a worthwhile cause? And an accidental irish Goodbye?

0:00:29.000 --> 0:00:36.960
<v Speaker 1>It's all coming up right after this welcome back slices.

0:00:36.960 --> 0:00:41.479
<v Speaker 1>Here's what you need to know today. Let's start with hockey.

0:00:41.520 --> 0:00:45.880
<v Speaker 1>The PWHL expansion Draft was Monday night, and wow, let's

0:00:45.920 --> 0:00:48.960
<v Speaker 1>just say Vancouver and Seattle should both be in contention

0:00:49.080 --> 0:00:52.120
<v Speaker 1>for the Walter Cup in their inaugural seasons. Both teams

0:00:52.240 --> 0:00:55.040
<v Speaker 1>entered Monday night's draft having already signed five players during

0:00:55.040 --> 0:00:57.400
<v Speaker 1>the initial signing window, but they're now up to twelve

0:00:57.440 --> 0:01:00.880
<v Speaker 1>apiece following a seven round snake draft, and Couver solidified

0:01:00.920 --> 0:01:04.120
<v Speaker 1>its reputation as a defensive giant by selecting Ottawa defender

0:01:04.200 --> 0:01:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Ashton Bell with the first pick of the night, while

0:01:06.560 --> 0:01:09.959
<v Speaker 1>Seattle added a slew of offensive weapons, with selections including

0:01:09.959 --> 0:01:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Boston's Hannahbilka, New York's Jesse Aldridge, and Toronto's Julia Gosling.

0:01:14.319 --> 0:01:16.399
<v Speaker 1>We'll link to the full draft results in the show

0:01:16.400 --> 0:01:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Notes to the WNBA. Former Chicago skyguard Ali Quigley has

0:01:21.160 --> 0:01:24.680
<v Speaker 1>officially announced her retirement from basketball, three years after she

0:01:24.720 --> 0:01:26.960
<v Speaker 1>played her last game. In an essay published and The

0:01:26.959 --> 0:01:29.399
<v Speaker 1>Player's Tribune on Tuesday, Quigley wrote that she didn't mean

0:01:29.400 --> 0:01:32.559
<v Speaker 1>to irish goodbye the WNBA, but after one off season

0:01:32.640 --> 0:01:36.040
<v Speaker 1>turned into two, and two seasons off turned into three.

0:01:36.319 --> 0:01:37.640
<v Speaker 2>She realized she was done.

0:01:37.920 --> 0:01:40.319
<v Speaker 1>Quigley and her wife, Courtney Van der Slute, also welcomed

0:01:40.360 --> 0:01:44.240
<v Speaker 1>their first child, Jana Christine, earlier this year. Quigley played

0:01:44.280 --> 0:01:47.800
<v Speaker 1>fourteen seasons in the WNBA, spending nearly her entire career

0:01:47.800 --> 0:01:49.680
<v Speaker 1>with her hometown team, the Chicago Sky.

0:01:50.120 --> 0:01:51.040
<v Speaker 2>She retires as a.

0:01:50.960 --> 0:01:54.760
<v Speaker 1>Three time All Star and four time three point shootout champion,

0:01:54.800 --> 0:01:58.440
<v Speaker 1>a record for both the WNBA and NBA for shootout wins.

0:01:59.080 --> 0:02:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Congrats to Ali, But between this and Courtney's ACL injury,

0:02:02.400 --> 0:02:04.200
<v Speaker 1>I guess I got to put the Vander quig shirt

0:02:04.200 --> 0:02:06.920
<v Speaker 1>I brought back out for this season back in my closet.

0:02:07.480 --> 0:02:08.280
<v Speaker 2>More WNBA.

0:02:08.360 --> 0:02:10.520
<v Speaker 1>The Dallas Wings will be without Ty Harris for the

0:02:10.520 --> 0:02:12.880
<v Speaker 1>rest of the season after the guard underwent successful knee

0:02:12.919 --> 0:02:16.120
<v Speaker 1>surgery on Tuesday. Harris played five games to start the season,

0:02:16.160 --> 0:02:18.640
<v Speaker 1>averaging four point six points, but had been out since

0:02:18.680 --> 0:02:20.919
<v Speaker 1>late May with a knee injury. In a statement, the

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:23.399
<v Speaker 1>Wings said Harris is expected to make a full recovery.

0:02:24.120 --> 0:02:24.680
<v Speaker 2>More hoops.

0:02:24.760 --> 0:02:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Letitia me Here is back with the Golden State Valkyries.

0:02:27.520 --> 0:02:30.160
<v Speaker 1>The former South Carolina standout played the last two seasons

0:02:30.160 --> 0:02:32.560
<v Speaker 1>with the Atlanta Dream and then attended training camp with

0:02:32.600 --> 0:02:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Golden State before getting waived ahead of the start of

0:02:35.160 --> 0:02:37.640
<v Speaker 1>the season. But on Sunday, the Valkyrie announced that the

0:02:37.639 --> 0:02:40.200
<v Speaker 1>team had re signed to me Here after waving kaya

0:02:40.280 --> 0:02:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Linskins and That's not All.

0:02:42.320 --> 0:02:43.800
<v Speaker 2>On Tuesday, with Julie van.

0:02:43.760 --> 0:02:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Leu heading off to compete in the Summer's EuroBasket Tournament,

0:02:46.440 --> 0:02:49.279
<v Speaker 1>the Valks announce that the team has also signed Aerial Powers.

0:02:49.880 --> 0:02:52.720
<v Speaker 1>More WNBA All Star voting gets underway today at two

0:02:52.760 --> 0:02:55.799
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern and runs through Saturday, June twenty eighth. Over

0:02:55.840 --> 0:02:57.480
<v Speaker 1>the next couple weeks, fans will be able to vote

0:02:57.480 --> 0:02:59.560
<v Speaker 1>for which players they think should be starters in this

0:02:59.639 --> 0:03:02.880
<v Speaker 1>year's All Star festivities, which will be held in Indianapolis's

0:03:02.919 --> 0:03:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Gainbridge Field House on July nineteenth. Fans account for fifty

0:03:06.480 --> 0:03:09.000
<v Speaker 1>percent of the vote, while current players and media account

0:03:09.000 --> 0:03:12.080
<v Speaker 1>for twenty five percent each. During the voting window, fans

0:03:12.120 --> 0:03:15.320
<v Speaker 1>may submit one ballot each day via WNBA dot com

0:03:15.320 --> 0:03:17.920
<v Speaker 1>and the WNBA app. We'll link to the voting page

0:03:17.919 --> 0:03:20.120
<v Speaker 1>in our show notes, so make sure to get those

0:03:20.160 --> 0:03:24.600
<v Speaker 1>ballots in. To swimming, Canadian superstar and three time Olympic

0:03:24.639 --> 0:03:28.200
<v Speaker 1>gold medalist Summer McIntosh set two world records this week

0:03:28.200 --> 0:03:31.720
<v Speaker 1>at Canadian national team trials. First, on Saturday, the eighteen

0:03:31.800 --> 0:03:33.600
<v Speaker 1>year old broke the world record in the four hundred

0:03:33.600 --> 0:03:36.280
<v Speaker 1>meter freestyle, taking more than a second off of the

0:03:36.280 --> 0:03:39.520
<v Speaker 1>previous mark set by Ariana Titmas of Australia in twenty

0:03:39.560 --> 0:03:40.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty three.

0:03:40.520 --> 0:03:41.720
<v Speaker 2>Then, on Monday night.

0:03:41.720 --> 0:03:43.880
<v Speaker 1>McIntosh broke the world record in the two hundred meter

0:03:43.960 --> 0:03:47.640
<v Speaker 1>individual medley, which was previously set by Hungary Katinka Jozu

0:03:47.680 --> 0:03:51.280
<v Speaker 1>in twenty fifteen. Ann McIntosh is not done yet. We're

0:03:51.280 --> 0:03:53.720
<v Speaker 1>recording this ahead of Wednesday night's four hundred meter im

0:03:53.760 --> 0:03:56.680
<v Speaker 1>final where she could be on world record watch again.

0:03:57.120 --> 0:03:59.640
<v Speaker 1>This all sets up an exciting showdown ahead of next

0:03:59.640 --> 0:04:03.560
<v Speaker 1>month's World Championships in Singapore, where McIntosh is expected to

0:04:03.560 --> 0:04:05.560
<v Speaker 1>go head to head against US DR Katie.

0:04:05.360 --> 0:04:07.200
<v Speaker 2>Ldeki in the four hundred meter free.

0:04:07.560 --> 0:04:10.320
<v Speaker 1>McIntosh also has the chance at that competition to become

0:04:10.360 --> 0:04:12.880
<v Speaker 1>the only swimmer other than Michael Phelps, to win five

0:04:12.960 --> 0:04:16.120
<v Speaker 1>individual gold medals at a single World Championship competition.

0:04:17.120 --> 0:04:18.080
<v Speaker 2>To softball and.

0:04:18.040 --> 0:04:20.280
<v Speaker 1>A little bit of ratings news, ESPN announced that this

0:04:20.360 --> 0:04:23.599
<v Speaker 1>year's women's College World Series was the most watched in history,

0:04:23.839 --> 0:04:26.880
<v Speaker 1>averaging one point two million viewers per game, up twenty

0:04:26.880 --> 0:04:29.280
<v Speaker 1>four percent year over year, and the finals set its

0:04:29.279 --> 0:04:31.719
<v Speaker 1>own viewership record, with the best of three series between

0:04:31.720 --> 0:04:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Texas and Texas Tech averaging two point two million viewers.

0:04:35.400 --> 0:04:38.960
<v Speaker 1>We love to see it. Finally, a reminder that albeit

0:04:39.040 --> 0:04:41.880
<v Speaker 1>tonight's Aurora FC game, when our side takes on the

0:04:41.960 --> 0:04:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Chicago City Dutch Lines at TCO Stadium in Egan, Minnesota,

0:04:46.000 --> 0:04:48.000
<v Speaker 1>if you're around, come say hi and get a good

0:04:48.040 --> 0:04:53.400
<v Speaker 1>game sticker. All right, slices, it's time for another edition

0:04:53.800 --> 0:04:56.359
<v Speaker 1>of Give Me a Minute. Although I did like the

0:04:56.360 --> 0:04:58.599
<v Speaker 1>suggestion that we call this the squeeze.

0:04:59.000 --> 0:05:01.240
<v Speaker 2>So we're so calling this a TBA name.

0:05:01.360 --> 0:05:05.039
<v Speaker 1>Let's bring in producer Alex Hi Alex Hello, and producer

0:05:05.080 --> 0:05:06.320
<v Speaker 1>me Shai me Zip.

0:05:06.880 --> 0:05:09.880
<v Speaker 2>You guys like the squeeze, I do, because the juice

0:05:09.920 --> 0:05:10.880
<v Speaker 2>is worth the squeeze.

0:05:10.920 --> 0:05:14.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, the juice is worth the squeeze. All right, Well,

0:05:14.000 --> 0:05:15.560
<v Speaker 1>we may be back next time with the new name.

0:05:15.560 --> 0:05:17.640
<v Speaker 1>For this time, we'll call it give me a minute,

0:05:17.680 --> 0:05:20.360
<v Speaker 1>but I think we're gonna need about five for this one.

0:05:20.480 --> 0:05:20.800
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:05:21.120 --> 0:05:23.440
<v Speaker 1>So today I wanted to talk about a mistake I made.

0:05:23.480 --> 0:05:25.520
<v Speaker 1>I made the mistake of using social media to talk

0:05:25.520 --> 0:05:27.560
<v Speaker 1>about a tough topic, and it's something that I've really

0:05:27.600 --> 0:05:30.159
<v Speaker 1>stopped doing in recent years. I used to spend a

0:05:30.200 --> 0:05:32.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of time on Twitter and Facebook and other places

0:05:33.240 --> 0:05:35.839
<v Speaker 1>engaging with folks, trying to talk through tough ideas, trying

0:05:35.880 --> 0:05:39.760
<v Speaker 1>to discourage problematic thinking, or shout down stereotypes and bullshit

0:05:39.800 --> 0:05:42.359
<v Speaker 1>holding women back in the sports world, or try to

0:05:42.400 --> 0:05:45.760
<v Speaker 1>discourage the spread of wrongheaded, moronic ideas about serious issues

0:05:45.760 --> 0:05:47.800
<v Speaker 1>that I was covering in sports, like domestic violence and

0:05:47.839 --> 0:05:50.320
<v Speaker 1>sexual assault. It felt worth it at the time, but

0:05:51.120 --> 0:05:53.200
<v Speaker 1>as Twitter got more and more full of bots and

0:05:53.320 --> 0:05:54.800
<v Speaker 1>engagement started to be paid for.

0:05:55.240 --> 0:05:56.360
<v Speaker 2>I stopped using it for.

0:05:56.320 --> 0:06:00.440
<v Speaker 1>That entirely, but Tuesday night on Blue Sky, I dipped

0:06:00.440 --> 0:06:02.120
<v Speaker 1>a toe in. I wanted to offer up a thought

0:06:02.120 --> 0:06:04.520
<v Speaker 1>on the folks that I saw attacking Simone Biles for

0:06:04.600 --> 0:06:07.600
<v Speaker 1>what they considered walking back her stance supporting trans athletes.

0:06:08.040 --> 0:06:09.039
<v Speaker 2>Let me catch you up on this.

0:06:09.360 --> 0:06:13.640
<v Speaker 1>So noted trans phobe and terrible person, Riley Gains responded

0:06:13.680 --> 0:06:16.120
<v Speaker 1>to a tweet celebrating a high school softball team state

0:06:16.160 --> 0:06:19.960
<v Speaker 1>championship win, and she wrote comments off lol to be

0:06:20.080 --> 0:06:24.240
<v Speaker 1>expected when your star player is a boy. Biles responded,

0:06:24.839 --> 0:06:27.880
<v Speaker 1>You're truly sick all of this campaigning because you lost

0:06:27.880 --> 0:06:30.839
<v Speaker 1>a race, straight up sore loser. You should be uplifting

0:06:30.920 --> 0:06:34.080
<v Speaker 1>the trans community and perhaps finding way to make sports inclusive,

0:06:34.440 --> 0:06:37.160
<v Speaker 1>or creating a new avenue where trans feels safe in sports,

0:06:37.400 --> 0:06:40.760
<v Speaker 1>maybe a transgender category in all sports, but instead you

0:06:40.880 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 1>bully them. One thing's for sure is no one in

0:06:43.480 --> 0:06:46.240
<v Speaker 1>sports is safe with you around now.

0:06:46.279 --> 0:06:47.920
<v Speaker 2>Predictably, hordes of.

0:06:47.880 --> 0:06:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Awful people started attacking Biles, including Riley Gains herself, weaponizing

0:06:51.960 --> 0:06:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Biles victimization by doctor Larry Nassar. So yesterday, in light

0:06:55.520 --> 0:06:58.680
<v Speaker 1>of all of that, Biles posted this I wanted to

0:06:58.680 --> 0:07:01.160
<v Speaker 1>follow up for my last tweets. I've always believed competitive

0:07:01.160 --> 0:07:03.760
<v Speaker 1>equity and inclusivity are both essential in sport. The current

0:07:03.760 --> 0:07:06.920
<v Speaker 1>system doesn't adequately balance these important principles, which often leads

0:07:06.920 --> 0:07:09.680
<v Speaker 1>to frustration and heated exchanges, and it didn't help for

0:07:09.720 --> 0:07:11.280
<v Speaker 1>me to get personal with Riley, which.

0:07:11.080 --> 0:07:11.880
<v Speaker 2>I apologize for.

0:07:12.200 --> 0:07:14.520
<v Speaker 1>These are sensitive, complicated issues that I truly don't have

0:07:14.600 --> 0:07:16.600
<v Speaker 1>all the answers or solutions to, but I believe it

0:07:16.640 --> 0:07:19.120
<v Speaker 1>starts with empathy and respect. I was not advocating for

0:07:19.160 --> 0:07:22.200
<v Speaker 1>policies that compromise fairness in women's sports. My objection is

0:07:22.240 --> 0:07:24.560
<v Speaker 1>to be singling out children for public scrutiny in ways

0:07:24.560 --> 0:07:28.200
<v Speaker 1>that feel personal and harmful. Individual athletes, especially kids, should

0:07:28.200 --> 0:07:30.600
<v Speaker 1>never be the focus of criticism of a flawed system

0:07:30.640 --> 0:07:33.320
<v Speaker 1>they have no control over. I believe sports organizations have

0:07:33.360 --> 0:07:36.160
<v Speaker 1>a responsibility to come up with rules supporting inclusion while

0:07:36.200 --> 0:07:38.880
<v Speaker 1>maintaining fair competition. We all want a future for sport

0:07:38.920 --> 0:07:42.920
<v Speaker 1>that is fair, inclusive, and respectful. Xoxo, Simone. Now, I

0:07:42.920 --> 0:07:45.120
<v Speaker 1>saw a lot of folks alleging that Biles was a

0:07:45.160 --> 0:07:48.200
<v Speaker 1>weak ally, that she backtracked on her support, and that

0:07:48.280 --> 0:07:51.240
<v Speaker 1>she apologized to Riley Gaines, who isn't deserving of an apology.

0:07:52.040 --> 0:07:55.400
<v Speaker 1>I disagreed, so I posted to Blue Sky Simone apologizing

0:07:55.400 --> 0:07:58.400
<v Speaker 1>for taking a personal shot at Riley g while reiterating

0:07:58.440 --> 0:08:02.240
<v Speaker 1>her belief in prioritizing inclusive while also seeking fairness. Isn't

0:08:02.280 --> 0:08:05.320
<v Speaker 1>backtracking or being a bad ally. Folks are still allowed

0:08:05.320 --> 0:08:08.520
<v Speaker 1>to care about their own behavior even if others are trash,

0:08:08.560 --> 0:08:11.160
<v Speaker 1>and there is nuance to the convo, which is what

0:08:11.240 --> 0:08:13.880
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk about with y'all today, Alex and meish,

0:08:14.000 --> 0:08:15.640
<v Speaker 1>So let's start the clock.

0:08:16.920 --> 0:08:17.240
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:08:17.480 --> 0:08:19.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm of the opinion that it wasn't necessary for Biles

0:08:19.680 --> 0:08:21.200
<v Speaker 1>to follow up, but I also understand that if you

0:08:21.240 --> 0:08:23.280
<v Speaker 1>behave in a way that you normally wouldn't or a

0:08:23.280 --> 0:08:25.120
<v Speaker 1>way that you don't approve of, when others do it,

0:08:25.440 --> 0:08:28.000
<v Speaker 1>you might feel compelled to apologize for that. I made

0:08:28.000 --> 0:08:30.000
<v Speaker 1>a rule for myself long ago to not go tit

0:08:30.040 --> 0:08:32.680
<v Speaker 1>for tat with people who harassed or attacked me online.

0:08:33.080 --> 0:08:35.760
<v Speaker 1>Adding more hate to the space via personal attacks just

0:08:35.840 --> 0:08:37.720
<v Speaker 1>didn't really seem like a great solution.

0:08:37.440 --> 0:08:38.080
<v Speaker 2>To the problem.

0:08:38.400 --> 0:08:41.559
<v Speaker 1>Plus, correct messages that I believe in are weakened by

0:08:41.559 --> 0:08:44.600
<v Speaker 1>ad homin and bullshit. They stand alone without that stuff,

0:08:45.000 --> 0:08:47.439
<v Speaker 1>and in my life, I don't ever engage with people

0:08:47.440 --> 0:08:49.640
<v Speaker 1>that way. So why get into shouting matches and hurl

0:08:49.720 --> 0:08:51.240
<v Speaker 1>insults just because I'm online.

0:08:51.320 --> 0:08:52.160
<v Speaker 2>That's not who I am.

0:08:52.559 --> 0:08:55.560
<v Speaker 1>So knowing that about myself, I understand perhaps why Simone

0:08:55.640 --> 0:08:57.760
<v Speaker 1>chose to post that and to follow up with her

0:08:57.800 --> 0:09:00.200
<v Speaker 1>thoughts on how the topic is nuanced and worth discussing.

0:09:01.240 --> 0:09:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Some of the responses I got to posting that about

0:09:03.920 --> 0:09:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Biles assumed I was muddying the water on inclusion or

0:09:07.080 --> 0:09:09.800
<v Speaker 1>using nuance as a way to obfuscate for problematic ideas

0:09:09.800 --> 0:09:12.480
<v Speaker 1>about trans inclusion. But I've made clear on this show

0:09:12.480 --> 0:09:15.360
<v Speaker 1>and everywhere else how I feel about trans inclusion in sport.

0:09:15.840 --> 0:09:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Being afraid to engage in conversation about it and refusing

0:09:18.720 --> 0:09:21.199
<v Speaker 1>to acknowledge that there is nuance isn't going to help

0:09:21.240 --> 0:09:24.520
<v Speaker 1>the cause. In my opinion, there's nuance. There's different policy

0:09:24.520 --> 0:09:28.120
<v Speaker 1>at different levels. There's bullshit mandatory DNA testing that also

0:09:28.120 --> 0:09:30.880
<v Speaker 1>harms CIS, women with DSD or naturally high levels of

0:09:30.920 --> 0:09:34.040
<v Speaker 1>testosterone that we should talk about. There's bullshit executive orders

0:09:34.080 --> 0:09:36.559
<v Speaker 1>that are trying to ban participation at every single level,

0:09:36.559 --> 0:09:39.920
<v Speaker 1>regardless of policy. So there's a lot to discuss, and

0:09:40.000 --> 0:09:41.559
<v Speaker 1>I think if your main goal is just to win

0:09:41.600 --> 0:09:43.800
<v Speaker 1>an online war with Riley Gains, and you think you're

0:09:43.840 --> 0:09:47.320
<v Speaker 1>seeding ground by acknowledging nuance you've already lost, that's not

0:09:47.400 --> 0:09:49.560
<v Speaker 1>the goal. The goal is to convince more people to

0:09:49.640 --> 0:09:52.800
<v Speaker 1>embrace inclusion while feeling good about fairness and policy across

0:09:52.800 --> 0:09:55.600
<v Speaker 1>different levels. So if you're attacking folks for offering up

0:09:55.600 --> 0:09:58.520
<v Speaker 1>that there's nuance at all, I just don't think that's

0:09:58.520 --> 0:10:01.080
<v Speaker 1>the way. While I was thinking of all of this,

0:10:01.400 --> 0:10:02.800
<v Speaker 1>I also got a note or two from some of

0:10:02.840 --> 0:10:04.760
<v Speaker 1>you about having Ashlyn Harris on the show as part

0:10:04.760 --> 0:10:07.120
<v Speaker 1>of a series we're doing now. While I understand people

0:10:07.200 --> 0:10:09.760
<v Speaker 1>have strong opinions about her and believes about what happened

0:10:09.800 --> 0:10:11.800
<v Speaker 1>between her and her ex that may or may not

0:10:11.840 --> 0:10:13.480
<v Speaker 1>be true, I honestly can't tell you that because I

0:10:13.480 --> 0:10:16.040
<v Speaker 1>wasn't in their marriage, you're allowed to have those opinions.

0:10:16.360 --> 0:10:18.680
<v Speaker 1>I still encourage you to listen to the show to

0:10:18.720 --> 0:10:21.880
<v Speaker 1>be able to have grace and curiosity about people, because

0:10:21.880 --> 0:10:25.600
<v Speaker 1>it feels like life has become toxically informed by Internet behavior,

0:10:25.960 --> 0:10:28.800
<v Speaker 1>with everything requiring an immediate black and white answer. A

0:10:28.920 --> 0:10:31.520
<v Speaker 1>villain and a hero an uplifting of someone or a

0:10:31.559 --> 0:10:34.760
<v Speaker 1>cancelation of them. And those two moments of my comment

0:10:34.760 --> 0:10:37.840
<v Speaker 1>about Biles and the comments I was getting about Ashland

0:10:38.040 --> 0:10:41.120
<v Speaker 1>happening sort of concurrently reminded me that at this stage

0:10:41.160 --> 0:10:44.080
<v Speaker 1>of my life, I'm trying to do more listening, more understanding,

0:10:44.120 --> 0:10:47.200
<v Speaker 1>and more allowing for grace as opposed to attacking, judging

0:10:47.240 --> 0:10:50.160
<v Speaker 1>or assuming. It's better for my mental health and interactions

0:10:50.200 --> 0:10:51.920
<v Speaker 1>with people in the world, and it's better for the

0:10:51.960 --> 0:10:54.200
<v Speaker 1>people around me, for whom I offer more compassion and

0:10:54.240 --> 0:10:57.360
<v Speaker 1>a chance to evolve and improve and explain themselves. So

0:10:57.640 --> 0:10:59.480
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to listen to anything. You don't have

0:10:59.520 --> 0:11:01.760
<v Speaker 1>to agree with me. I'm just offering up that the

0:11:01.800 --> 0:11:03.880
<v Speaker 1>world is offering me opportunities to approach things a little

0:11:03.880 --> 0:11:06.560
<v Speaker 1>bit differently, and I think sometimes, as much as our

0:11:06.600 --> 0:11:09.040
<v Speaker 1>instincts tell us otherwise, it's worth taking a pause and

0:11:09.080 --> 0:11:09.920
<v Speaker 1>thinking about doing that.

0:11:10.640 --> 0:11:12.520
<v Speaker 2>What do you think, Mesh, I think.

0:11:12.320 --> 0:11:14.880
<v Speaker 3>That's a damn That's a damn mic drop right there.

0:11:15.040 --> 0:11:20.000
<v Speaker 3>I You know, I struggle with this personally, right because

0:11:20.360 --> 0:11:23.240
<v Speaker 3>I am a person who I consider to have a

0:11:23.320 --> 0:11:26.600
<v Speaker 3>very strong moral compass. I feel grateful to you to

0:11:26.679 --> 0:11:28.840
<v Speaker 3>have been raised by two parents who both had very

0:11:28.880 --> 0:11:32.199
<v Speaker 3>strong moral compasses, who educated me about the world around

0:11:32.200 --> 0:11:34.000
<v Speaker 3>me and the people around me from a very young age.

0:11:34.840 --> 0:11:38.200
<v Speaker 3>And that doesn't mean I know everything about everything. You

0:11:38.200 --> 0:11:40.080
<v Speaker 3>say it all the time. I'm a baby in this

0:11:40.160 --> 0:11:41.319
<v Speaker 3>in this life game, you know.

0:11:41.280 --> 0:11:43.280
<v Speaker 2>What I mean. There's there's still so much to learn

0:11:43.320 --> 0:11:44.640
<v Speaker 2>and acknowledging it.

0:11:44.800 --> 0:11:47.920
<v Speaker 3>You know, I'll acknowledge it sometimes, I like not it sometimes.

0:11:48.920 --> 0:11:51.600
<v Speaker 3>But what I found is that even even for myself,

0:11:51.720 --> 0:11:54.160
<v Speaker 3>I didn't want to get social media for this exact reason.

0:11:54.320 --> 0:11:56.400
<v Speaker 3>I got social media my junior year of high school,

0:11:56.679 --> 0:11:58.760
<v Speaker 3>and I'd already seen the way it had changed the

0:11:58.760 --> 0:12:01.240
<v Speaker 3>way my friends and the people around me thought about things,

0:12:01.559 --> 0:12:04.600
<v Speaker 3>took things in. And the issue for me is, like

0:12:04.640 --> 0:12:08.160
<v Speaker 3>you're saying, snapping to judgments about things is so convenient,

0:12:08.720 --> 0:12:11.640
<v Speaker 3>and even from you know, what was that twenty thirteen,

0:12:11.679 --> 0:12:14.800
<v Speaker 3>twenty fourteen to now, we've only been bombarded with more

0:12:14.920 --> 0:12:17.760
<v Speaker 3>and more and more stuff. So there's always so much

0:12:17.840 --> 0:12:20.679
<v Speaker 3>the process, and it's easy, it's lazy, and it's convenient

0:12:21.240 --> 0:12:24.880
<v Speaker 3>to make snap judgments. So you know, you see a buzzword,

0:12:24.920 --> 0:12:26.920
<v Speaker 3>you see a person, you see a platform and a post,

0:12:27.000 --> 0:12:29.720
<v Speaker 3>and you assume immediately you know all the relevant facts

0:12:29.800 --> 0:12:31.600
<v Speaker 3>and you can decide what side of a line that

0:12:31.640 --> 0:12:34.960
<v Speaker 3>you're on it. It's just it's easy to do, and

0:12:35.040 --> 0:12:36.520
<v Speaker 3>I feel like it's something we all have to take

0:12:36.559 --> 0:12:40.200
<v Speaker 3>responsibility for. Is checking that stuff you know at the door,

0:12:40.400 --> 0:12:43.040
<v Speaker 3>knowing when okay, maybe I don't actually know everything about this,

0:12:43.160 --> 0:12:44.960
<v Speaker 3>maybe I should be giving this person a little bit

0:12:44.960 --> 0:12:46.680
<v Speaker 3>more grace, because at the end of the day, don't

0:12:46.679 --> 0:12:48.880
<v Speaker 3>we all also want a little bit of grace. Don't

0:12:48.880 --> 0:12:51.600
<v Speaker 3>we all also have nuance in different contexts and different

0:12:51.600 --> 0:12:54.520
<v Speaker 3>things happening behind the scenes that everybody doesn't see. So

0:12:54.960 --> 0:12:57.000
<v Speaker 3>it's it's not to say also that some of these

0:12:57.040 --> 0:12:59.079
<v Speaker 3>snap judgments aren't correct, because.

0:12:58.840 --> 0:13:00.800
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes they absolutely are right.

0:13:01.120 --> 0:13:02.920
<v Speaker 3>You know, if you're like me, if you're also Leo,

0:13:03.000 --> 0:13:05.560
<v Speaker 3>Sarah's a Leo. Period, sometimes we're right. A lot of

0:13:05.559 --> 0:13:07.720
<v Speaker 3>the time, we could be right right, but that doesn't

0:13:07.760 --> 0:13:09.839
<v Speaker 3>mean we can't leave space for ourselves to be wrong.

0:13:09.960 --> 0:13:11.800
<v Speaker 3>And that's how we make sure that we never align

0:13:11.880 --> 0:13:14.240
<v Speaker 3>with anybody ever. Is when we're never wrong, we can

0:13:14.280 --> 0:13:16.640
<v Speaker 3>never be questioned, we can never question ourselves. So it's

0:13:16.720 --> 0:13:19.360
<v Speaker 3>just it's a tough thing to do in the world

0:13:19.400 --> 0:13:21.720
<v Speaker 3>that we live. In today, but it's so necessary, and

0:13:21.760 --> 0:13:24.720
<v Speaker 3>at the end of the day, was so much shit

0:13:25.200 --> 0:13:28.559
<v Speaker 3>happening in the world at large. We need more people

0:13:28.640 --> 0:13:31.360
<v Speaker 3>who are willing to connect than are willing to cancel.

0:13:32.400 --> 0:13:34.839
<v Speaker 2>And now that's a dropped money.

0:13:35.800 --> 0:13:37.360
<v Speaker 3>I'll just leave it there because I don't want to

0:13:37.360 --> 0:13:37.800
<v Speaker 3>mess it up.

0:13:40.000 --> 0:13:43.200
<v Speaker 4>What do you think, Alex oh Man, Well, I want

0:13:43.240 --> 0:13:45.880
<v Speaker 4>to just add one tweet of Simons in which, to me,

0:13:46.040 --> 0:13:48.680
<v Speaker 4>is the one that she was actually apologizing for. When

0:13:48.679 --> 0:13:51.679
<v Speaker 4>she initially responded to Riley, she wrote, believe someone your

0:13:51.679 --> 0:13:55.160
<v Speaker 4>own size, which would ironically be a male, and I

0:13:55.160 --> 0:13:57.720
<v Speaker 4>think that's what she is referring to when she is

0:13:57.760 --> 0:14:01.720
<v Speaker 4>referring to getting personal with Riley. But I totally agree

0:14:01.760 --> 0:14:05.319
<v Speaker 4>with you about the lack of nuance in these spaces.

0:14:05.559 --> 0:14:09.920
<v Speaker 4>And I don't expect somebody like Simone Biles to have

0:14:10.120 --> 0:14:14.880
<v Speaker 4>all of the answers right. She, as a professional athlete,

0:14:15.040 --> 0:14:18.160
<v Speaker 4>has her own career to worry about. But I appreciate

0:14:18.240 --> 0:14:21.480
<v Speaker 4>that she is coming at this from an opinion of

0:14:21.600 --> 0:14:25.840
<v Speaker 4>inclusion and respect in lifting up children, and the fact

0:14:25.880 --> 0:14:28.480
<v Speaker 4>that we have gotten so far away from that in

0:14:28.520 --> 0:14:32.440
<v Speaker 4>this current conversation is extremely frustrating. And I'll also add

0:14:32.480 --> 0:14:36.600
<v Speaker 4>that I think sometimes the community that is advocating on

0:14:36.720 --> 0:14:40.560
<v Speaker 4>behalf of trans inclusion in sports, they are up against

0:14:40.800 --> 0:14:45.520
<v Speaker 4>such a hard fight, an existential fight against human rights

0:14:46.040 --> 0:14:50.600
<v Speaker 4>for the lives and safety of their community, that sometimes

0:14:50.640 --> 0:14:55.160
<v Speaker 4>what happens is there is a lack of acknowledgment of

0:14:55.200 --> 0:14:57.680
<v Speaker 4>what the general population is aware of when it comes

0:14:57.680 --> 0:15:00.440
<v Speaker 4>to sports. So the example all often set is the

0:15:00.480 --> 0:15:04.920
<v Speaker 4>fact that last year, when you look at the women's

0:15:04.920 --> 0:15:09.280
<v Speaker 4>one hundred meter AE, thousand men ran faster than the

0:15:09.320 --> 0:15:15.120
<v Speaker 4>current women's world record. Now, those are cisgender men competing

0:15:15.120 --> 0:15:18.880
<v Speaker 4>at all different levels, and cisgender men and trans women

0:15:19.320 --> 0:15:21.240
<v Speaker 4>not the same thing by any means. So I don't

0:15:21.240 --> 0:15:23.640
<v Speaker 4>want to make it sound like I'm equating those two things.

0:15:24.040 --> 0:15:27.000
<v Speaker 4>But when you ask a random person on the street, hey,

0:15:27.240 --> 0:15:29.880
<v Speaker 4>is it fair for a trans woman to compete against

0:15:29.920 --> 0:15:34.040
<v Speaker 4>a cisgender woman, it is unsurprising to me that their

0:15:34.080 --> 0:15:36.880
<v Speaker 4>answer would be no if they don't have any further

0:15:37.080 --> 0:15:40.800
<v Speaker 4>education or information on that topic. And so I want

0:15:40.840 --> 0:15:43.600
<v Speaker 4>to respect that that is a place that a lot

0:15:43.680 --> 0:15:46.600
<v Speaker 4>of people are coming from, and that in some ways

0:15:46.680 --> 0:15:49.880
<v Speaker 4>it's backed up by their experiences of watching high school

0:15:49.920 --> 0:15:53.280
<v Speaker 4>track meets, of watching their daughters and sons compete in sports,

0:15:54.040 --> 0:15:59.800
<v Speaker 4>but that experience doesn't negate the experience and lives of

0:16:00.000 --> 0:16:03.200
<v Speaker 4>brands kids that just want to participate. And I think

0:16:03.240 --> 0:16:06.520
<v Speaker 4>too often it feels like there is this importance that

0:16:06.640 --> 0:16:09.080
<v Speaker 4>is being placed on youth sports in a way that

0:16:09.760 --> 0:16:12.560
<v Speaker 4>does not matter down the line. What matters in youth

0:16:12.600 --> 0:16:16.560
<v Speaker 4>sports down the line is inclusion and acceptance. It does

0:16:16.600 --> 0:16:18.960
<v Speaker 4>not matter what time you placed. And if a team

0:16:19.040 --> 0:16:22.880
<v Speaker 4>has a quote unquote unfair advantage, well, let me tell

0:16:22.880 --> 0:16:25.400
<v Speaker 4>you there's so many unfair advantages in life. And you're

0:16:25.440 --> 0:16:27.920
<v Speaker 4>going to be better off for accepting people because of

0:16:27.960 --> 0:16:31.480
<v Speaker 4>who they are than rejecting them because they have an

0:16:31.520 --> 0:16:33.600
<v Speaker 4>advantage over you potentially.

0:16:33.880 --> 0:16:36.160
<v Speaker 3>And I feel like you you make a great general

0:16:36.200 --> 0:16:41.080
<v Speaker 3>point also about like because you as an individual, or

0:16:41.120 --> 0:16:43.200
<v Speaker 3>me as an individual, or any of us as individuals

0:16:43.360 --> 0:16:47.000
<v Speaker 3>have educated ourselves about certain things, that doesn't mean everybody

0:16:47.040 --> 0:16:49.920
<v Speaker 3>has that same level of understanding. I feel like that's

0:16:49.960 --> 0:16:52.160
<v Speaker 3>such an easy trap to fall into on social media

0:16:52.160 --> 0:16:55.240
<v Speaker 3>because you just think, you know, you've got your followers

0:16:55.240 --> 0:16:56.840
<v Speaker 3>on your feed, and you're and the people that you

0:16:56.920 --> 0:16:59.520
<v Speaker 3>care about who can be of more like mind to

0:16:59.560 --> 0:17:02.160
<v Speaker 3>you than other people just random folks on the internet

0:17:02.160 --> 0:17:04.439
<v Speaker 3>that you don't know, and it's very easy to assume

0:17:04.480 --> 0:17:07.840
<v Speaker 3>that everybody understands things at a certain level. And I

0:17:07.880 --> 0:17:10.480
<v Speaker 3>think that just goes back to the point it's better

0:17:10.520 --> 0:17:12.800
<v Speaker 3>to call people in. It's better to say, hey, let's

0:17:12.800 --> 0:17:15.280
<v Speaker 3>have a dialogue about this, because then you got an

0:17:15.280 --> 0:17:18.520
<v Speaker 3>opportunity to reach more people and help them understand. And

0:17:18.560 --> 0:17:21.080
<v Speaker 3>then next time they see something on their feed or

0:17:21.280 --> 0:17:23.440
<v Speaker 3>we have this conversation about Simona and Riley, they're not

0:17:23.480 --> 0:17:26.320
<v Speaker 3>as quick to say, oh, let me jump down her throat,

0:17:26.600 --> 0:17:27.639
<v Speaker 3>right yeah.

0:17:27.720 --> 0:17:29.400
<v Speaker 4>I think what scares me the most in this current

0:17:29.440 --> 0:17:31.879
<v Speaker 4>moment is the fact of how it speaks to just

0:17:32.240 --> 0:17:36.720
<v Speaker 4>larger misinformation. You know, following the executive order barring trans

0:17:36.760 --> 0:17:39.120
<v Speaker 4>girls and women from sport, there was a poll about

0:17:39.119 --> 0:17:42.600
<v Speaker 4>how sixty seven percent of Democrats Democrats believe that trans

0:17:42.640 --> 0:17:45.240
<v Speaker 4>women should not compete in women's sports, and that to

0:17:45.359 --> 0:17:50.399
<v Speaker 4>me is a sign of how flawed this current moment

0:17:50.480 --> 0:17:54.200
<v Speaker 4>is in terms of people having information that informs their beliefs.

0:17:54.280 --> 0:17:56.040
<v Speaker 4>People have beliefs that aren't informed by.

0:17:55.960 --> 0:17:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Fact, and that's why saying that there's nuance and let's

0:17:59.760 --> 0:18:01.879
<v Speaker 1>talk about it is the best way to get those

0:18:01.920 --> 0:18:06.280
<v Speaker 1>people to understand policy at different levels. Inclusion at every

0:18:06.400 --> 0:18:09.880
<v Speaker 1>level of youth is the answer. EO's barring everything from

0:18:09.920 --> 0:18:13.880
<v Speaker 1>pre k on our bullshit, mandatory hormone testing when there

0:18:13.920 --> 0:18:17.399
<v Speaker 1>isn't proof of T levels contributing at the elite, like

0:18:17.520 --> 0:18:20.160
<v Speaker 1>all this stuff. That's why I said nuance, and that's

0:18:20.160 --> 0:18:23.000
<v Speaker 1>why Simone said it's complicated, and let's try to prioritize

0:18:23.000 --> 0:18:25.800
<v Speaker 1>inclusivity and fairness. There's a great story people want to

0:18:25.800 --> 0:18:28.320
<v Speaker 1>read it in the Washington Post and opinion piece by

0:18:28.359 --> 0:18:31.679
<v Speaker 1>Philip Bump talking about how much parents are putting money

0:18:31.680 --> 0:18:35.679
<v Speaker 1>into youth sports and that one in nine parents believe

0:18:35.760 --> 0:18:39.400
<v Speaker 1>that their child will be a professional athlete, and how

0:18:39.440 --> 0:18:44.080
<v Speaker 1>that's intersecting with their worries about fairness and trans inclusion,

0:18:44.720 --> 0:18:49.240
<v Speaker 1>and to Alex's point, how unfair the playing field already

0:18:49.320 --> 0:18:51.119
<v Speaker 1>is based on the amount of wealth that you have

0:18:51.240 --> 0:18:54.000
<v Speaker 1>and ability for your children to even participate at all,

0:18:54.320 --> 0:18:56.679
<v Speaker 1>the likelihood of them making it to collegeen playing as

0:18:56.680 --> 0:18:59.120
<v Speaker 1>a results of that wealth, on and on and on.

0:18:59.440 --> 0:19:00.960
<v Speaker 2>There is so much nuanced to this topic.

0:19:01.000 --> 0:19:02.879
<v Speaker 1>There are so many ways to call people in to

0:19:02.920 --> 0:19:06.760
<v Speaker 1>talk about it that don't involve immediately canceling them and

0:19:06.800 --> 0:19:10.160
<v Speaker 1>I think that that applies to a million things going

0:19:10.200 --> 0:19:13.280
<v Speaker 1>on right now that aren't just this conversation about Sione

0:19:13.320 --> 0:19:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Biles or Ashlett Harris or anything else. For instance, we

0:19:18.400 --> 0:19:21.040
<v Speaker 1>just got a report today that Serena Williams and Venus

0:19:21.040 --> 0:19:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Williams are launching a new video podcast, Amazing, Awesome.

0:19:23.880 --> 0:19:24.639
<v Speaker 2>Can't wait to watch it.

0:19:24.680 --> 0:19:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Where will it be on X owned by Elon Musk,

0:19:29.680 --> 0:19:32.360
<v Speaker 1>which we're all working hard to move away from. Yea,

0:19:32.520 --> 0:19:35.080
<v Speaker 1>we will reserve our judgment on that, as we will

0:19:35.080 --> 0:19:37.400
<v Speaker 1>reserve our judgment on many other things until we have

0:19:37.480 --> 0:19:39.760
<v Speaker 1>more facts, we get our questions answered, and if in

0:19:39.760 --> 0:19:43.439
<v Speaker 1>the end we still decide, hey, that sucks, we're allowed to.

0:19:44.080 --> 0:19:47.000
<v Speaker 1>But let's take those beats and have those conversations first.

0:19:47.400 --> 0:19:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Per usual, we went way over the time we allotted

0:19:49.600 --> 0:19:51.480
<v Speaker 1>for ourselves, so we're definitely going to need to change

0:19:51.480 --> 0:19:53.680
<v Speaker 1>the name of this segment. All right, We got to

0:19:53.720 --> 0:19:55.560
<v Speaker 1>take a quick break. When we come back, it's anti

0:19:55.600 --> 0:19:57.040
<v Speaker 1>coostable stick around.

0:20:03.480 --> 0:20:04.160
<v Speaker 2>Joining us now.

0:20:04.200 --> 0:20:07.400
<v Speaker 1>She's a women's sports reporter for Front Office Sports, formerly

0:20:07.440 --> 0:20:09.439
<v Speaker 1>of the Chicago Sun Times and the Greatest City in

0:20:09.440 --> 0:20:09.800
<v Speaker 1>the World.

0:20:09.800 --> 0:20:12.200
<v Speaker 2>She's on to make her smelly er pastures.

0:20:11.760 --> 0:20:15.080
<v Speaker 1>In NYC and Iowa grad Queen of the Thrift Fit

0:20:15.160 --> 0:20:17.800
<v Speaker 1>and hot off of Kendrick Lamar WNBA doubleheader.

0:20:17.840 --> 0:20:21.600
<v Speaker 2>It's Annie Costable. Hi Annie, what an intro.

0:20:22.320 --> 0:20:27.280
<v Speaker 5>I I'm always anxiously awaiting your intros and they just

0:20:27.320 --> 0:20:30.040
<v Speaker 5>get better and better each time a person comes on.

0:20:30.160 --> 0:20:30.919
<v Speaker 6>So thank you for that.

0:20:31.240 --> 0:20:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Yes, you're in the two timers club. You have been

0:20:33.320 --> 0:20:36.320
<v Speaker 1>here before. Welcome back, but with a new gig this time.

0:20:36.440 --> 0:20:38.440
<v Speaker 1>So tell us how it's going so far with Front

0:20:38.440 --> 0:20:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Office Sports.

0:20:39.960 --> 0:20:43.280
<v Speaker 6>Do we want the realty or like the real positivity?

0:20:43.359 --> 0:20:46.000
<v Speaker 2>No? No, no, we want honesty, not fake positivity.

0:20:46.520 --> 0:20:49.680
<v Speaker 6>Yeah. No, genuinely positive things to say.

0:20:49.720 --> 0:20:51.959
<v Speaker 5>But I always try to be real in that, Like

0:20:52.359 --> 0:20:56.320
<v Speaker 5>anytime you make a significant change, it's not seamless.

0:20:56.320 --> 0:20:57.000
<v Speaker 6>It never is.

0:20:57.040 --> 0:20:59.840
<v Speaker 5>And I think when you start something new, your hope

0:20:59.880 --> 0:21:02.960
<v Speaker 5>is that you know you're going to come in and

0:21:02.960 --> 0:21:05.320
<v Speaker 5>and feel just as confident as you did in your

0:21:05.359 --> 0:21:07.280
<v Speaker 5>old job. But the fact is I was at the

0:21:07.320 --> 0:21:09.800
<v Speaker 5>Sun Times for seven years. That was seven years of

0:21:09.840 --> 0:21:14.560
<v Speaker 5>source building and building you know, a following and becoming

0:21:14.560 --> 0:21:18.400
<v Speaker 5>an expert on all things Chicago, sky and so here

0:21:18.440 --> 0:21:21.159
<v Speaker 5>at Front Office Sports. The challenge I'm really excited about

0:21:21.440 --> 0:21:24.879
<v Speaker 5>is starting from scratch, not in the sense of you know,

0:21:24.920 --> 0:21:28.120
<v Speaker 5>my WNBA source building, but just as far as all

0:21:28.160 --> 0:21:31.280
<v Speaker 5>other women's sports goes. You know, it's it's an opportunity

0:21:31.359 --> 0:21:37.040
<v Speaker 5>to approach my coverage. It's in terms of women's sports

0:21:37.080 --> 0:21:40.399
<v Speaker 5>the same way I approached everything I did covering the

0:21:40.440 --> 0:21:42.960
<v Speaker 5>Chicago Sky and that's what I'm really excited about.

0:21:42.960 --> 0:21:44.800
<v Speaker 6>But again, like that's not easy.

0:21:44.920 --> 0:21:48.120
<v Speaker 5>You got to start from from zero and build back

0:21:48.200 --> 0:21:51.240
<v Speaker 5>up to one hundred. So as far as my competitive

0:21:51.320 --> 0:21:54.199
<v Speaker 5>side goes, and I think, you know, like I'm very competitive,

0:21:55.840 --> 0:21:59.320
<v Speaker 5>that's the biggest challenge is knowing it's going to come

0:21:59.359 --> 0:22:02.640
<v Speaker 5>with some learning curves and getting beat here and there.

0:22:02.760 --> 0:22:06.640
<v Speaker 5>I take getting beat on stories. So yeah, that's that's

0:22:06.680 --> 0:22:11.200
<v Speaker 5>been the challenge. But I mean, New York, why wasn't

0:22:11.240 --> 0:22:14.840
<v Speaker 5>I here before? I feel like I've like landed exactly

0:22:14.880 --> 0:22:15.760
<v Speaker 5>where I'm supposed to be.

0:22:16.000 --> 0:22:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and what about New York City. It's very exciting.

0:22:18.880 --> 0:22:21.600
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot going on. And for those who don't

0:22:21.600 --> 0:22:23.679
<v Speaker 1>live in a big city, they probably think Chicago and

0:22:23.680 --> 0:22:26.080
<v Speaker 1>New York are quite similar, but there's a lot of differences.

0:22:26.320 --> 0:22:28.280
<v Speaker 1>How's it been getting used to living in a new place.

0:22:29.280 --> 0:22:32.480
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, So being back this weekend in Chicago actually was

0:22:32.600 --> 0:22:35.120
<v Speaker 5>like a mental test for me. I obviously was there

0:22:35.160 --> 0:22:36.800
<v Speaker 5>for work, but I was like, Okay, this is going

0:22:36.880 --> 0:22:42.120
<v Speaker 5>to be a good experiment to see if mentally I

0:22:42.160 --> 0:22:43.919
<v Speaker 5>still feel confident about.

0:22:43.640 --> 0:22:46.640
<v Speaker 6>The decision I made, or I'm happy in New York, YadA, YadA.

0:22:47.000 --> 0:22:49.200
<v Speaker 5>And so yeah, when I was back in Chicago, I've

0:22:49.200 --> 0:22:51.199
<v Speaker 5>only I mean, I've been in New York three months,

0:22:51.320 --> 0:22:57.120
<v Speaker 5>and my immediate kind of sense was, wow, this feels

0:22:57.200 --> 0:23:00.800
<v Speaker 5>already so different here. And the difference was Chicago is

0:23:00.840 --> 0:23:04.639
<v Speaker 5>it's just you can find your pockets of calm and

0:23:04.760 --> 0:23:05.800
<v Speaker 5>quiet and peace.

0:23:05.880 --> 0:23:06.040
<v Speaker 6>You know.

0:23:06.160 --> 0:23:09.400
<v Speaker 5>Even getting out the house at like seven eight am,

0:23:09.680 --> 0:23:12.399
<v Speaker 5>I was walking, you know, back my same path to

0:23:12.440 --> 0:23:14.600
<v Speaker 5>get my coffee in the morning, I'm like, oh my god.

0:23:14.440 --> 0:23:16.560
<v Speaker 6>There's no where are all the people.

0:23:16.600 --> 0:23:18.560
<v Speaker 5>You know, the second you step out of your house

0:23:18.640 --> 0:23:21.680
<v Speaker 5>in New York, it's just it's chaos. It's like from

0:23:21.720 --> 0:23:24.800
<v Speaker 5>the second you get on the train, it's chaos. And again,

0:23:24.880 --> 0:23:28.320
<v Speaker 5>at first, I was like, Okay, this feels right. I

0:23:28.400 --> 0:23:31.320
<v Speaker 5>feel at home here, but I won't truly know how

0:23:31.359 --> 0:23:33.160
<v Speaker 5>at home I feel in New York until.

0:23:32.960 --> 0:23:34.000
<v Speaker 6>I go back to Chicago.

0:23:34.119 --> 0:23:37.240
<v Speaker 5>And by the end of my trip in Chicago was like, man,

0:23:37.600 --> 0:23:39.080
<v Speaker 5>get me back to New York.

0:23:39.160 --> 0:23:42.439
<v Speaker 1>Wow, okay, good, I'm happy for you. We'll see how

0:23:42.400 --> 0:23:44.920
<v Speaker 1>the wong at lasts. I mean, I think Chicago is

0:23:44.960 --> 0:23:47.080
<v Speaker 1>obviously superior. So eventually you want to come back, but

0:23:47.160 --> 0:23:49.359
<v Speaker 1>for now, have your fun. It's a good, good young

0:23:49.400 --> 0:23:53.200
<v Speaker 1>person fun. Let's talk sports because now, as you said,

0:23:53.560 --> 0:23:56.760
<v Speaker 1>your beat is a little bit bigger and that's very cool,

0:23:56.880 --> 0:23:59.120
<v Speaker 1>and I like to have your perspective on so many

0:23:59.119 --> 0:24:02.120
<v Speaker 1>different places and cities and markets. And before we even

0:24:02.119 --> 0:24:03.960
<v Speaker 1>get to your main beat, which is basketball, let's talk

0:24:04.000 --> 0:24:05.920
<v Speaker 1>softball a little bit because you've written some stuff about

0:24:05.920 --> 0:24:09.239
<v Speaker 1>the Women's College World Series, in particular Nigrie Kennedy. So

0:24:09.320 --> 0:24:12.199
<v Speaker 1>tell us what you think it means both for Texas

0:24:12.280 --> 0:24:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Tech to have her coming back and also what it

0:24:15.640 --> 0:24:18.080
<v Speaker 1>means for a softball player to be making that kind

0:24:18.119 --> 0:24:22.720
<v Speaker 1>of nil money as this AUSL Professional League is launching,

0:24:23.400 --> 0:24:26.399
<v Speaker 1>And will there be any friction for those players in

0:24:26.520 --> 0:24:28.320
<v Speaker 1>college ball getting to the pros.

0:24:28.640 --> 0:24:31.160
<v Speaker 2>Is it going to be like the old days.

0:24:30.960 --> 0:24:34.359
<v Speaker 1>Of playing for a really high profile program in college

0:24:34.400 --> 0:24:37.280
<v Speaker 1>basketball and going to the WNBN being like, oh weird,

0:24:37.320 --> 0:24:39.639
<v Speaker 1>we have like worse locker rooms in travel than I

0:24:39.720 --> 0:24:40.159
<v Speaker 1>used to have.

0:24:41.560 --> 0:24:44.520
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, So I'm so happy we're talking about this because

0:24:45.119 --> 0:24:49.240
<v Speaker 5>let me start with Nija coming back to Texas Tech. Obviously,

0:24:49.359 --> 0:24:51.960
<v Speaker 5>I think what she did this year, them signing her

0:24:52.000 --> 0:24:55.160
<v Speaker 5>and them signing her to that seven figure deal shows

0:24:55.200 --> 0:24:58.080
<v Speaker 5>exactly how impactful she is on that program. And one

0:24:58.160 --> 0:25:00.720
<v Speaker 5>year she led them to the Women's College World Series,

0:25:00.720 --> 0:25:03.639
<v Speaker 5>and so obviously Texas gets it done this year, but

0:25:03.760 --> 0:25:06.600
<v Speaker 5>her return, I mean, in a lot of people's minds,

0:25:06.680 --> 0:25:10.120
<v Speaker 5>puts them right back in the Women's College World Series,

0:25:10.160 --> 0:25:12.520
<v Speaker 5>competing for a final. And that's why again they re

0:25:12.680 --> 0:25:15.840
<v Speaker 5>upped on that seven figure deal. Now, as far as

0:25:16.040 --> 0:25:20.400
<v Speaker 5>it goes in consideration to how that type of salary

0:25:20.480 --> 0:25:23.720
<v Speaker 5>is going to impact the professional level, you're exactly right

0:25:23.800 --> 0:25:27.080
<v Speaker 5>in terms of comparing it to the WNBA and some

0:25:27.160 --> 0:25:31.320
<v Speaker 5>of the differences that players saw and honestly continue.

0:25:30.920 --> 0:25:32.520
<v Speaker 6>To see even in recent years.

0:25:32.560 --> 0:25:35.760
<v Speaker 5>I mean, Angel Reeves going from LSU to the Chicago Sky,

0:25:35.920 --> 0:25:40.560
<v Speaker 5>big difference in terms of experience and where they're training, YadA, YadA.

0:25:40.720 --> 0:25:42.240
<v Speaker 6>But when it comes to.

0:25:42.640 --> 0:25:47.760
<v Speaker 5>Softball, there's still a huge gap in that salary. And

0:25:47.800 --> 0:25:49.720
<v Speaker 5>I mean, when we're talking about a million dollars. The

0:25:49.800 --> 0:25:53.439
<v Speaker 5>average salary for AUSL is forty thousand, So that's a

0:25:53.520 --> 0:25:57.639
<v Speaker 5>significant difference. And so when you think about a player

0:25:57.880 --> 0:26:01.600
<v Speaker 5>like Nija, she's not only going to have options to

0:26:01.720 --> 0:26:04.119
<v Speaker 5>play here in the States, but she's going to have

0:26:04.160 --> 0:26:06.800
<v Speaker 5>options to play overseas too, and we know that in

0:26:06.880 --> 0:26:10.160
<v Speaker 5>Japan that's where players are making the most lucrative salaries.

0:26:10.560 --> 0:26:14.359
<v Speaker 5>And so something I've been asking different sources and different

0:26:14.359 --> 0:26:18.840
<v Speaker 5>context is, Okay, could we see a similar situation as

0:26:18.840 --> 0:26:21.240
<v Speaker 5>we saw to Diana Tarassi where she was paid to

0:26:21.240 --> 0:26:25.880
<v Speaker 5>sit out and solely play overseas? You know, and I've

0:26:25.880 --> 0:26:28.000
<v Speaker 5>talked to multiple sources who are like, that is not

0:26:28.160 --> 0:26:33.359
<v Speaker 5>a far stretch of the imagination because the resources that

0:26:33.520 --> 0:26:39.240
<v Speaker 5>teams have in Japan significantly outweighed the resources that we've

0:26:39.320 --> 0:26:42.000
<v Speaker 5>known women's softball to have here in the States. And

0:26:42.040 --> 0:26:45.960
<v Speaker 5>obviously AOSL is changing things, especially with this investment from

0:26:45.960 --> 0:26:49.439
<v Speaker 5>Major League Baseball. But when you anticipate a player like

0:26:49.560 --> 0:26:51.840
<v Speaker 5>Nija coming in, you still have a couple of years.

0:26:52.160 --> 0:26:56.159
<v Speaker 5>How is AUSL how is the professional softball space in

0:26:56.200 --> 0:26:58.719
<v Speaker 5>America preparing for that?

0:26:59.040 --> 0:27:00.920
<v Speaker 6>Because she's already making a million.

0:27:00.840 --> 0:27:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Right and she's obviously an anomaly because she's making way

0:27:04.240 --> 0:27:07.080
<v Speaker 1>more than other softball players on the NL front, but

0:27:07.480 --> 0:27:11.040
<v Speaker 1>still worth noting that there are these players that eventually

0:27:11.200 --> 0:27:16.040
<v Speaker 1>are game changers and leagues have to adjust in order

0:27:16.080 --> 0:27:17.879
<v Speaker 1>to compete to keep them, and she's going to be

0:27:17.880 --> 0:27:19.360
<v Speaker 1>one of them. So it'll be interesting to see how

0:27:19.359 --> 0:27:23.960
<v Speaker 1>AUSL builds from this current four team barnstorming league, which

0:27:24.000 --> 0:27:25.720
<v Speaker 1>is a great way to start, and then uses that

0:27:25.800 --> 0:27:28.879
<v Speaker 1>investment from MLB to really expand and blow up. All right,

0:27:28.960 --> 0:27:32.639
<v Speaker 1>let's talk WNBA. There's so much to get to. We

0:27:32.680 --> 0:27:34.800
<v Speaker 1>always want to talk more WNB in the show, but

0:27:34.840 --> 0:27:37.040
<v Speaker 1>we're like a multi sport show, so it feels like

0:27:37.040 --> 0:27:39.360
<v Speaker 1>there's always stories that fall between the cracks, so you're

0:27:39.359 --> 0:27:41.680
<v Speaker 1>here to help pick them up. I want to start

0:27:41.680 --> 0:27:46.040
<v Speaker 1>with the team in your new hometown, the Liberty. I mean,

0:27:46.359 --> 0:27:48.679
<v Speaker 1>I guess this can be expected, but it's not always

0:27:48.680 --> 0:27:51.679
<v Speaker 1>a given that a team comes right back after a

0:27:51.800 --> 0:27:55.080
<v Speaker 1>championship with the same heart and integrity and passion and

0:27:55.119 --> 0:27:56.119
<v Speaker 1>desire and hustle.

0:27:56.560 --> 0:27:58.879
<v Speaker 2>But they are killing it. What are you seeing from

0:27:58.920 --> 0:27:59.960
<v Speaker 2>the Liberty?

0:28:00.160 --> 0:28:02.360
<v Speaker 6>I mean, the addition of Natasha Cloud.

0:28:02.720 --> 0:28:05.719
<v Speaker 5>I don't want to say I was a skeptic.

0:28:06.359 --> 0:28:08.480
<v Speaker 6>Sorry, Tasha, but.

0:28:08.600 --> 0:28:12.399
<v Speaker 5>I just wasn't sure or wasn't clear on exactly what

0:28:12.600 --> 0:28:15.159
<v Speaker 5>her impact would be, how she would shift this team.

0:28:15.600 --> 0:28:17.880
<v Speaker 6>And my god, I mean her energy.

0:28:18.480 --> 0:28:22.280
<v Speaker 5>You you always hear teams coming off a championship talking

0:28:22.320 --> 0:28:26.440
<v Speaker 5>about how they can't stay the same, they can't stay complacent,

0:28:26.480 --> 0:28:29.160
<v Speaker 5>And I mean we've seen it cover in our coverage

0:28:29.200 --> 0:28:32.159
<v Speaker 5>of former championship teams a lot of times.

0:28:32.480 --> 0:28:34.800
<v Speaker 6>That's what what does the team in is?

0:28:35.600 --> 0:28:38.840
<v Speaker 5>You know, they bring their their main coreback and not

0:28:39.000 --> 0:28:44.760
<v Speaker 5>something really changes, right, Tasha is mentally a different player

0:28:44.840 --> 0:28:48.000
<v Speaker 5>than anybody else on her team as far as just

0:28:48.080 --> 0:28:52.240
<v Speaker 5>the energy she brings and how she invigorates all of

0:28:52.280 --> 0:28:53.320
<v Speaker 5>the players around her.

0:28:54.160 --> 0:28:54.320
<v Speaker 6>Her.

0:28:54.680 --> 0:28:56.960
<v Speaker 5>The staff has talked about that, her teammates have talked

0:28:56.960 --> 0:29:00.240
<v Speaker 5>about that, so so one, I mean, that's the most

0:29:00.240 --> 0:29:04.480
<v Speaker 5>significant change. And then John Quell Jones, I mean she

0:29:04.920 --> 0:29:09.160
<v Speaker 5>is like it's I don't even know how to put

0:29:09.160 --> 0:29:12.480
<v Speaker 5>this other than to just say it plainly, like her

0:29:12.680 --> 0:29:17.800
<v Speaker 5>absence continues to show how impactful she is.

0:29:17.920 --> 0:29:21.080
<v Speaker 6>And it's crazy because she's this dominant player.

0:29:21.520 --> 0:29:23.440
<v Speaker 5>It's not like you miss her on the court, but

0:29:23.520 --> 0:29:27.560
<v Speaker 5>the second she's unavailable, you're like, holy, I'm sorry, Holy shit,

0:29:27.680 --> 0:29:31.520
<v Speaker 5>but she is. She's everything to this team. So I

0:29:31.560 --> 0:29:35.680
<v Speaker 5>feel like Tasha has again invigorated this team in their

0:29:35.720 --> 0:29:39.400
<v Speaker 5>pursuit of a back to back title, and everybody else

0:29:39.440 --> 0:29:40.440
<v Speaker 5>has just gotten better.

0:29:40.800 --> 0:29:41.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:29:41.560 --> 0:29:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we're missing Junkquell on my fantasy team too. Skyler's

0:29:48.320 --> 0:29:50.040
<v Speaker 1>is really missing John Quell Jones.

0:29:50.920 --> 0:29:53.120
<v Speaker 5>Wait when I saw your team name, I was like

0:29:53.240 --> 0:29:58.239
<v Speaker 5>what I had, No, I don't know.

0:30:00.240 --> 0:30:02.719
<v Speaker 1>In reference to Okay, I'm gonna send it to you,

0:30:02.920 --> 0:30:06.000
<v Speaker 1>She's literally doesn't realize that the person she's talking to

0:30:06.120 --> 0:30:07.960
<v Speaker 1>is micd up or that there's a hot mic near

0:30:08.040 --> 0:30:10.240
<v Speaker 1>her and they're talking about years of the league and

0:30:10.320 --> 0:30:13.160
<v Speaker 1>being old, and the girl's like, you're not old, and

0:30:13.240 --> 0:30:14.120
<v Speaker 1>she like old pussy.

0:30:15.440 --> 0:30:17.760
<v Speaker 6>Oh my god.

0:30:17.880 --> 0:30:21.959
<v Speaker 5>Literally, when you posted this, I'm like, what.

0:30:22.400 --> 0:30:24.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we like to push the envelope a little bit. Annie,

0:30:24.840 --> 0:30:25.120
<v Speaker 2>you know.

0:30:25.080 --> 0:30:27.960
<v Speaker 6>That, and you know I do as well. Let's just

0:30:28.120 --> 0:30:29.320
<v Speaker 6>keep pushing that da.

0:30:29.640 --> 0:30:30.520
<v Speaker 2>Right, that's right.

0:30:31.440 --> 0:30:34.000
<v Speaker 1>We actually suffered from a couple of hot flashes in

0:30:34.040 --> 0:30:36.280
<v Speaker 1>the first two challenges of the Fantasy League, but now

0:30:36.280 --> 0:30:39.800
<v Speaker 1>our old pussy is winning, so glad to report that.

0:30:40.000 --> 0:30:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about the other team that's winning all of

0:30:41.880 --> 0:30:44.719
<v Speaker 1>their games. Minnesota Links nine to zero and if he's

0:30:44.760 --> 0:30:47.200
<v Speaker 1>to call, you're my preseason pick for MVP.

0:30:47.520 --> 0:30:49.800
<v Speaker 2>She looks to be on a mission. What are you

0:30:49.840 --> 0:30:51.080
<v Speaker 2>seeing from them?

0:30:51.560 --> 0:30:55.280
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I agree with you on the mission statement. I

0:30:55.320 --> 0:31:00.400
<v Speaker 5>also picked snafisas my preseason MVP pick, And I think, again,

0:31:00.640 --> 0:31:04.560
<v Speaker 5>when you lose a title, it spurs something in you.

0:31:05.280 --> 0:31:07.360
<v Speaker 5>But when you lose a title the way they did,

0:31:08.320 --> 0:31:11.160
<v Speaker 5>I mean, they're coming back for a vengeance. And especially

0:31:11.160 --> 0:31:14.479
<v Speaker 5>when you think about who Cheryl Reeve is in this league,

0:31:14.880 --> 0:31:18.160
<v Speaker 5>what her franchise has experienced in the past.

0:31:18.240 --> 0:31:20.600
<v Speaker 6>I mean not to bring up too much of like the.

0:31:20.520 --> 0:31:25.320
<v Speaker 5>WNBA's history and the tea and whatever, but like, let's

0:31:25.320 --> 0:31:27.880
<v Speaker 5>talk about it. I mean the Minnesota Links and the

0:31:28.040 --> 0:31:31.920
<v Speaker 5>LA Sparks in twenty sixteen, that was another controversial ending

0:31:32.320 --> 0:31:35.640
<v Speaker 5>to a WNBA finals, And there's a lot of people

0:31:35.680 --> 0:31:37.960
<v Speaker 5>who feel like even in that moment, that was the

0:31:38.000 --> 0:31:41.400
<v Speaker 5>Minnesota Links Finals to win, and you know, an officiating

0:31:41.480 --> 0:31:45.400
<v Speaker 5>call changed changed everything. And so I think when you

0:31:45.520 --> 0:31:48.320
<v Speaker 5>consider again the history of the league and specifically the

0:31:48.360 --> 0:31:54.880
<v Speaker 5>history of the Links, it's very exciting to put into

0:31:55.400 --> 0:31:57.640
<v Speaker 5>the forefront of your mind the possibility that the Links

0:31:57.640 --> 0:32:00.440
<v Speaker 5>and the Lever could meet again and this finals.

0:32:00.440 --> 0:32:02.720
<v Speaker 6>And it also makes sense why.

0:32:02.520 --> 0:32:04.600
<v Speaker 5>This team is competing the way that they are with

0:32:04.760 --> 0:32:07.680
<v Speaker 5>Cheryl Reeve at the home because again, she's been through it.

0:32:07.720 --> 0:32:12.240
<v Speaker 5>This has been something new. What I'll also say about

0:32:12.360 --> 0:32:16.360
<v Speaker 5>the Minnesota links In and the Liberty specifically, is when

0:32:16.360 --> 0:32:21.320
<v Speaker 5>you consider the issues with the WNBA scheduling, it's astounding

0:32:21.840 --> 0:32:24.280
<v Speaker 5>that these two teams will not meet until July.

0:32:24.880 --> 0:32:29.280
<v Speaker 6>Like, where who did that? Let's can we talk to them?

0:32:29.280 --> 0:32:31.240
<v Speaker 2>Like, yeah, well.

0:32:31.080 --> 0:32:34.080
<v Speaker 1>I want to criticize them, and I also have questions

0:32:34.120 --> 0:32:36.239
<v Speaker 1>about how many of the venues they're playing in have

0:32:36.320 --> 0:32:39.400
<v Speaker 1>other tenants that take precedents Like I feel like you

0:32:39.440 --> 0:32:42.960
<v Speaker 1>can blame the schedule maker or you can first ask

0:32:43.040 --> 0:32:45.000
<v Speaker 1>to get a peek behind the scenes and figure out

0:32:45.000 --> 0:32:46.760
<v Speaker 1>what they were dealing with when they were trying to

0:32:46.800 --> 0:32:47.720
<v Speaker 1>make set schedule.

0:32:48.560 --> 0:32:50.360
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, you know what, that's fair. You know what?

0:32:50.520 --> 0:32:54.960
<v Speaker 5>Listen to you being like middle ground considering all angles,

0:32:55.280 --> 0:32:57.080
<v Speaker 5>I'm just raging out over You're like.

0:32:57.080 --> 0:32:59.240
<v Speaker 1>But I agree because we all want to see them play.

0:32:59.360 --> 0:33:03.840
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, truly, And then it's like, Okay, I mean it's

0:33:04.200 --> 0:33:06.200
<v Speaker 5>long shot, but will they both be undefeated?

0:33:06.240 --> 0:33:09.160
<v Speaker 6>That'd be crazy, can you? Yeah?

0:33:09.240 --> 0:33:11.440
<v Speaker 2>Unheard of let's talk about some other teams.

0:33:11.480 --> 0:33:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Who's the most surprising team to you in a good

0:33:13.920 --> 0:33:15.240
<v Speaker 1>way so far this season?

0:33:16.400 --> 0:33:18.560
<v Speaker 6>I think the Valkyriees.

0:33:18.760 --> 0:33:23.640
<v Speaker 5>I know, I know their record doesn't necessarily show oh

0:33:23.760 --> 0:33:26.800
<v Speaker 5>surprising in a good way, but again, I think the

0:33:26.880 --> 0:33:31.920
<v Speaker 5>way that they've competed, it's it shows how good of

0:33:31.920 --> 0:33:35.760
<v Speaker 5>a coach one Natalie is that the culture that they're

0:33:35.760 --> 0:33:41.560
<v Speaker 5>building really is taking hold and that they as they

0:33:42.200 --> 0:33:45.160
<v Speaker 5>kind of spoke about wanting to be, they truly can

0:33:45.360 --> 0:33:50.840
<v Speaker 5>be a competitive franchise and in a very short order

0:33:50.880 --> 0:33:55.960
<v Speaker 5>exactly so. I think again their record isn't exactly what

0:33:56.200 --> 0:34:00.480
<v Speaker 5>you'd maybe associate with, you know, exciting top tier team,

0:34:00.880 --> 0:34:03.800
<v Speaker 5>but again, as far as what they were up against

0:34:03.840 --> 0:34:06.920
<v Speaker 5>and even the roster that they built through expansion, I

0:34:06.960 --> 0:34:12.239
<v Speaker 5>don't know that many people thought they'd be competing in

0:34:12.280 --> 0:34:15.200
<v Speaker 5>the way that they're competing this early on. And another

0:34:15.280 --> 0:34:17.120
<v Speaker 5>factor that you got to consider they have a number

0:34:17.120 --> 0:34:20.520
<v Speaker 5>of players that are going to compete in euro Basket. Ye,

0:34:20.680 --> 0:34:23.000
<v Speaker 5>so how they respond to that too is going to

0:34:23.000 --> 0:34:25.879
<v Speaker 5>be another test of the culture that they're building there.

0:34:26.360 --> 0:34:28.480
<v Speaker 1>And I want to take this opportunity to shout out

0:34:28.600 --> 0:34:32.960
<v Speaker 1>my previously named but unnamed least favorite player in the

0:34:33.040 --> 0:34:36.000
<v Speaker 1>league who has been playing quite well of late. And

0:34:36.040 --> 0:34:38.479
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna apologize because my take on you after

0:34:38.520 --> 0:34:41.160
<v Speaker 1>one game was an accurate take. But I will say

0:34:41.200 --> 0:34:45.279
<v Speaker 1>props to you for looking more comfortable, getting your head

0:34:45.320 --> 0:34:48.000
<v Speaker 1>about you on the court, and having some fine games.

0:34:48.120 --> 0:34:50.279
<v Speaker 1>And you will remain nameless because this is a kind

0:34:50.280 --> 0:34:53.280
<v Speaker 1>and friendly show where you don't call out people for struggling.

0:34:54.600 --> 0:34:56.520
<v Speaker 6>Oh my god, will you tell me off the error?

0:34:56.719 --> 0:34:57.000
<v Speaker 2>Yes?

0:34:57.080 --> 0:34:58.640
<v Speaker 1>And if you listen to this episode, you might have

0:34:58.719 --> 0:35:00.440
<v Speaker 1>even sort of figured it out the way that I

0:35:00.520 --> 0:35:04.080
<v Speaker 1>just said that, But maybe not because I'm snaky. Okay,

0:35:04.120 --> 0:35:06.520
<v Speaker 1>what's the most surprising team in a bad way?

0:35:07.880 --> 0:35:10.239
<v Speaker 6>Oh God, people are gonna hate me for this.

0:35:10.680 --> 0:35:13.880
<v Speaker 2>It's the Chicago Sky Duh. What the I mean is

0:35:13.960 --> 0:35:15.800
<v Speaker 2>going on? Annie girl?

0:35:16.160 --> 0:35:19.160
<v Speaker 5>I wish The only reason I wish I was still

0:35:19.200 --> 0:35:22.680
<v Speaker 5>in Chicago was so that I could I knew, I

0:35:22.719 --> 0:35:26.080
<v Speaker 5>could know in and out what's going on, because obviously

0:35:26.120 --> 0:35:29.920
<v Speaker 5>you can observe from afar. But but one thing I

0:35:29.960 --> 0:35:32.520
<v Speaker 5>really took pride in is when I wrote something, I

0:35:32.920 --> 0:35:36.479
<v Speaker 5>really knew it or I really had multiple sources on it.

0:35:36.680 --> 0:35:41.240
<v Speaker 5>You know, I was I was not out here spewing lies.

0:35:41.800 --> 0:35:44.920
<v Speaker 5>Although people might want to think so that's okay. You

0:35:44.960 --> 0:35:49.040
<v Speaker 5>guys are titled to your opinion. So with this team,

0:35:49.200 --> 0:35:53.359
<v Speaker 5>I mean one Tyler Marsh. I when when the Sky

0:35:53.440 --> 0:35:56.560
<v Speaker 5>hired him, and I still believe this. They I wrote,

0:35:56.680 --> 0:36:00.319
<v Speaker 5>they hired the right guy. And I think you don't

0:36:00.320 --> 0:36:05.160
<v Speaker 5>have his track record, his championship track record, and you

0:36:05.239 --> 0:36:07.680
<v Speaker 5>don't come from the tree that he comes from. And

0:36:09.080 --> 0:36:12.319
<v Speaker 5>if you're not an adequate coach, right, you don't fake that,

0:36:12.400 --> 0:36:15.840
<v Speaker 5>you don't get You just accidentally end up in the

0:36:15.920 --> 0:36:19.399
<v Speaker 5>situations that Tyler Marsh has ended up in. So I

0:36:19.440 --> 0:36:21.560
<v Speaker 5>still believe that Tyler Marsh is the right guy for

0:36:21.600 --> 0:36:27.879
<v Speaker 5>the Chicago Sky. But obviously this team when it was constructed,

0:36:27.880 --> 0:36:30.359
<v Speaker 5>when Jeff made the moves he made, and he brought

0:36:30.400 --> 0:36:34.000
<v Speaker 5>the players and he brought in something apparent was that

0:36:34.200 --> 0:36:38.279
<v Speaker 5>they don't have a certified bucket getter. You know, they

0:36:38.320 --> 0:36:43.680
<v Speaker 5>don't have an MVP candidate. And I know, right, I

0:36:43.719 --> 0:36:45.680
<v Speaker 5>know those players don't even grow on trees. I'm not

0:36:45.719 --> 0:36:49.240
<v Speaker 5>saying every team even has, you know, an MVP candidate player,

0:36:49.840 --> 0:36:50.799
<v Speaker 5>but they don't.

0:36:50.600 --> 0:36:52.319
<v Speaker 6>Have a certified star.

0:36:52.400 --> 0:36:56.560
<v Speaker 5>They have a lot of players who who contribute to

0:36:56.920 --> 0:36:59.880
<v Speaker 5>two teams winning, but none that you can rely on

0:37:00.200 --> 0:37:03.160
<v Speaker 5>to get it done. And then when you think about

0:37:03.160 --> 0:37:07.319
<v Speaker 5>the fact that, Okay, if anybody was the creator, it

0:37:07.440 --> 0:37:11.400
<v Speaker 5>was Courtney Vandersloute and now she's down with a season

0:37:11.520 --> 0:37:15.760
<v Speaker 5>ending injury, tearing her ACL against the Indiana Fever.

0:37:15.960 --> 0:37:19.399
<v Speaker 6>It really shows how.

0:37:19.719 --> 0:37:22.520
<v Speaker 5>The Chicago sky were a house of cards and are

0:37:22.560 --> 0:37:25.360
<v Speaker 5>a house of cards, and now you just pulled out,

0:37:26.000 --> 0:37:30.080
<v Speaker 5>in my opinion, the card that was going to hold

0:37:30.080 --> 0:37:30.760
<v Speaker 5>it all together.

0:37:31.040 --> 0:37:36.600
<v Speaker 6>So I think they just it was a question mark

0:37:36.640 --> 0:37:37.280
<v Speaker 6>from the beginning.

0:37:37.680 --> 0:37:40.239
<v Speaker 5>I did think the addition of Ariel Atkins was going

0:37:40.320 --> 0:37:43.120
<v Speaker 5>to make a difference back Alan, we haven't seen that yet.

0:37:43.160 --> 0:37:45.160
<v Speaker 5>But now you pull out Courtney vanderslut and now the

0:37:45.239 --> 0:37:47.239
<v Speaker 5>question becomes will we ever see it?

0:37:47.480 --> 0:37:51.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, who's facilitating, who's setting up the bigs that

0:37:51.600 --> 0:37:54.239
<v Speaker 1>can't create their own shots. Where's the inside out game

0:37:54.280 --> 0:37:56.440
<v Speaker 1>that's required if you want to have two bigs like

0:37:56.480 --> 0:37:59.200
<v Speaker 1>that that aren't really Yes, Reese can hit a couple

0:37:59.280 --> 0:38:01.279
<v Speaker 1>threes everyone while, but she's mostly in the paint.

0:38:01.320 --> 0:38:02.479
<v Speaker 2>Camille is going to be in the paint.

0:38:02.719 --> 0:38:04.920
<v Speaker 1>You need a three point threat otherwise they're just dropping

0:38:04.920 --> 0:38:08.200
<v Speaker 1>everyone inside and keeping you from getting it inside to

0:38:08.280 --> 0:38:11.440
<v Speaker 1>your bigs. It just the formation of the team was

0:38:11.480 --> 0:38:14.480
<v Speaker 1>tenuous already, but it required that some of their swings

0:38:14.480 --> 0:38:17.920
<v Speaker 1>on three point shooters came out shooting, especially after losing

0:38:17.920 --> 0:38:18.839
<v Speaker 1>Maybury last year.

0:38:19.440 --> 0:38:20.279
<v Speaker 6>Right, it's been and.

0:38:21.320 --> 0:38:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Listen, I want to give Tyler Marsh enough time, but

0:38:24.840 --> 0:38:27.000
<v Speaker 1>literally my trainer this morning, who doesn't even watch a

0:38:27.000 --> 0:38:28.959
<v Speaker 1>lot of WNBA, was like, how long is the leisha

0:38:29.040 --> 0:38:29.439
<v Speaker 1>on the sky?

0:38:29.520 --> 0:38:29.800
<v Speaker 2>Coach?

0:38:29.840 --> 0:38:31.960
<v Speaker 1>This is brutal And I'm watching the games and that's

0:38:31.960 --> 0:38:33.760
<v Speaker 1>what's standing out to me. It's not that they're losing.

0:38:34.080 --> 0:38:40.480
<v Speaker 1>They are fundamentally offensive right now. They are not doing

0:38:40.560 --> 0:38:43.239
<v Speaker 1>technical things right. They're they're not calling timeouts in the

0:38:43.239 --> 0:38:46.040
<v Speaker 1>moments that they should. Reese is regressing in terms of

0:38:46.040 --> 0:38:48.360
<v Speaker 1>bringing the ball down off of boards before going back up, Like,

0:38:48.360 --> 0:38:51.640
<v Speaker 1>there's all these moments that feel coachable, and I'm wondering,

0:38:51.920 --> 0:38:54.799
<v Speaker 1>fundamentally what happened to a bunch of these players.

0:38:55.440 --> 0:38:58.719
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, So another observation I have and I don't disagree

0:38:58.719 --> 0:39:02.080
<v Speaker 5>with you there. But in addition to that, which that

0:39:02.239 --> 0:39:05.560
<v Speaker 5>was a whole lot, there's an energy issue. Like this

0:39:05.640 --> 0:39:08.240
<v Speaker 5>team yesterday against the New York Liberty and again Corney

0:39:08.320 --> 0:39:12.200
<v Speaker 5>Vanderslit's out, So that's that's a heavy burden to bear.

0:39:12.280 --> 0:39:17.480
<v Speaker 5>But this team does not even look like it's playing

0:39:18.640 --> 0:39:21.600
<v Speaker 5>at its full, you know, one hundred percent.

0:39:22.239 --> 0:39:23.880
<v Speaker 6>And when you're a team that.

0:39:25.320 --> 0:39:27.759
<v Speaker 5>Can't be saved by one single player, what are you

0:39:27.800 --> 0:39:29.880
<v Speaker 5>holding back for? You know, like this is at a

0:39:29.960 --> 0:39:32.160
<v Speaker 5>certain point, it's got to be a little bit about pride.

0:39:32.640 --> 0:39:37.720
<v Speaker 5>You guys are getting blown out repeatedly. Where's where's the pride?

0:39:37.800 --> 0:39:41.600
<v Speaker 5>And so I think in addition to that, even there's

0:39:41.640 --> 0:39:44.040
<v Speaker 5>an identity issue because how are they playing?

0:39:44.200 --> 0:39:45.680
<v Speaker 6>What what's their style?

0:39:45.760 --> 0:39:49.160
<v Speaker 5>What are they leaning on when you know they need

0:39:49.200 --> 0:39:51.960
<v Speaker 5>to get a bucket and none of that's been defined,

0:39:52.160 --> 0:39:54.480
<v Speaker 5>none of that's been defined. And then you throw on

0:39:54.680 --> 0:39:58.560
<v Speaker 5>Courtney's injury. It's like this is really a big question mark.

0:39:58.600 --> 0:40:00.680
<v Speaker 5>But as far as the leash goes, I will say

0:40:01.000 --> 0:40:04.399
<v Speaker 5>in my time covering the Sky that ownership group does

0:40:04.400 --> 0:40:08.920
<v Speaker 5>not fire people easily. Okay except for Teaspoon, But again

0:40:09.000 --> 0:40:11.360
<v Speaker 5>I say that to say that speaks to the dysfunction

0:40:11.440 --> 0:40:12.520
<v Speaker 5>that went on there last year.

0:40:12.760 --> 0:40:16.239
<v Speaker 6>They do not. They do not fire people likely they

0:40:16.239 --> 0:40:16.759
<v Speaker 6>do not, yea.

0:40:16.840 --> 0:40:17.680
<v Speaker 2>And we talked about this.

0:40:17.719 --> 0:40:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Everyone was angry on behalf of Tea Spoon, and rightfully

0:40:20.920 --> 0:40:22.520
<v Speaker 1>so in the sense of her legacy and maybe what

0:40:22.560 --> 0:40:24.520
<v Speaker 1>she could do as a coach, But what was going

0:40:24.520 --> 0:40:29.160
<v Speaker 1>on behind the scenes reportedly was not going to be

0:40:29.200 --> 0:40:31.360
<v Speaker 1>a fixed with leadership the way it was in the

0:40:31.360 --> 0:40:32.400
<v Speaker 1>players that were remaining.

0:40:33.080 --> 0:40:35.960
<v Speaker 5>No, and what I'll add to that is, and this

0:40:36.000 --> 0:40:38.440
<v Speaker 5>is something I've said in the months since, is Teresa

0:40:38.480 --> 0:40:42.200
<v Speaker 5>Weatherspoon as a player and Teresa Weatherspoon as a coach,

0:40:42.400 --> 0:40:46.680
<v Speaker 5>two separate people, A great human being, No one's No.

0:40:47.000 --> 0:40:49.759
<v Speaker 5>I certainly wouldn't say otherwise. I don't know her well

0:40:49.840 --> 0:40:52.680
<v Speaker 5>enough on a personal level to comment on good bad.

0:40:52.920 --> 0:40:56.319
<v Speaker 5>You know that's not my job. But player coach, two

0:40:56.360 --> 0:41:00.640
<v Speaker 5>separate people. Player, hall of famer, incredible, No one will

0:41:00.640 --> 0:41:04.000
<v Speaker 5>ever take away from her legacy coach. She still has

0:41:04.040 --> 0:41:07.120
<v Speaker 5>a long way to go to be a coach in

0:41:07.160 --> 0:41:10.520
<v Speaker 5>the WNBA, Like, that's not an easy job. And just

0:41:10.560 --> 0:41:13.120
<v Speaker 5>because you're a Hall of Fame coach or player does

0:41:13.160 --> 0:41:15.480
<v Speaker 5>not equate to a Hall of Fame coaching career.

0:41:15.719 --> 0:41:17.080
<v Speaker 6>And that is okay to say.

0:41:17.200 --> 0:41:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I was talking to a GM in the league

0:41:19.120 --> 0:41:21.319
<v Speaker 1>about that, and I think there's been a lot of

0:41:21.320 --> 0:41:23.240
<v Speaker 1>talk the last couple of years about a couple players.

0:41:23.239 --> 0:41:25.480
<v Speaker 1>There was least a Leslie kind of openly talking about

0:41:25.480 --> 0:41:27.480
<v Speaker 1>how she didn't get a job, and then people were

0:41:27.520 --> 0:41:29.920
<v Speaker 1>frustrated about Tea Spoon, and the GM just said to

0:41:29.960 --> 0:41:33.040
<v Speaker 1>me as we were talking about that, there are former

0:41:33.080 --> 0:41:36.000
<v Speaker 1>players that make great coaches, and there are teams that

0:41:36.080 --> 0:41:39.040
<v Speaker 1>need someone who is already a veteran coach who knows

0:41:39.080 --> 0:41:41.359
<v Speaker 1>how to manage personalities as much as they know how

0:41:41.400 --> 0:41:43.719
<v Speaker 1>to write up ecss and o's. And I think sometimes

0:41:43.800 --> 0:41:46.040
<v Speaker 1>that's hard to take if there's a player that you

0:41:46.080 --> 0:41:48.359
<v Speaker 1>really liked as a player, but maybe is it ready yet?

0:41:48.400 --> 0:41:50.200
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's talk about a couple other Let's talk

0:41:50.239 --> 0:41:51.720
<v Speaker 1>specific individual players.

0:41:51.760 --> 0:41:54.120
<v Speaker 2>Anyone that hasn't started off as strong as expected for you?

0:41:55.200 --> 0:41:59.319
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I think Juel Lloyd in Las Vegas, and obviously

0:41:59.840 --> 0:42:04.840
<v Speaker 5>you know her career is it speaks for itself already

0:42:04.880 --> 0:42:08.640
<v Speaker 5>at this point. But I think when you consider, you know,

0:42:08.719 --> 0:42:14.560
<v Speaker 5>the intention behind this move and the standards for the aces,

0:42:14.640 --> 0:42:18.000
<v Speaker 5>you know they Jewell obviously wanted out of Seattle. She's

0:42:18.239 --> 0:42:21.680
<v Speaker 5>made that perfectly clear. If it wasn't already before you know,

0:42:21.760 --> 0:42:25.560
<v Speaker 5>the season began. But on top of wanting out, you know,

0:42:25.600 --> 0:42:30.479
<v Speaker 5>the Aces were set on upholding this championship standard, and

0:42:30.640 --> 0:42:34.040
<v Speaker 5>bringing her in was about upholding that championship standard. And

0:42:34.040 --> 0:42:36.480
<v Speaker 5>I'm not, by any means saying that that where they're

0:42:36.520 --> 0:42:39.680
<v Speaker 5>at is on Jewel. I think Becky Hammond just spoke

0:42:39.719 --> 0:42:42.880
<v Speaker 5>about how this team has, you know, a character issue

0:42:42.880 --> 0:42:46.839
<v Speaker 5>in terms of not having that that grit and that

0:42:47.280 --> 0:42:52.680
<v Speaker 5>determined dog right exactly, that dog is missing and that

0:42:52.840 --> 0:42:56.920
<v Speaker 5>will is missing. And I think in order for the

0:42:57.000 --> 0:43:02.000
<v Speaker 5>Aces to be a content, to remain a contender, they need.

0:43:01.880 --> 0:43:04.160
<v Speaker 6>Jewel Lloyd to be the Jewel Lloyd.

0:43:05.640 --> 0:43:08.080
<v Speaker 5>You know that we've seen the Jewellloyd that's leading the

0:43:08.160 --> 0:43:12.040
<v Speaker 5>league in points per game or at least among the

0:43:12.560 --> 0:43:15.359
<v Speaker 5>top five. You know, they need that Jewel Lloyd to

0:43:15.520 --> 0:43:19.480
<v Speaker 5>contribute to put that team, you know, where I think

0:43:19.480 --> 0:43:21.440
<v Speaker 5>they have been and where they expect to be.

0:43:21.960 --> 0:43:24.160
<v Speaker 1>What about a player that's taken the biggest leap, Maybe

0:43:24.160 --> 0:43:27.480
<v Speaker 1>someone that you're like, okay, all right, look at this start.

0:43:28.640 --> 0:43:29.720
<v Speaker 6>That's a good question.

0:43:31.280 --> 0:43:36.960
<v Speaker 5>Honestly, I feel like this might be biased because I

0:43:37.080 --> 0:43:40.080
<v Speaker 5>cover this team or I'm around this team as much

0:43:40.080 --> 0:43:43.120
<v Speaker 5>as I am, But truly, it's going to be Natasha Cloud.

0:43:43.520 --> 0:43:46.200
<v Speaker 5>And I don't even think because of her points per game.

0:43:46.280 --> 0:43:49.400
<v Speaker 5>I mean, obviously you know she's I think she's averaging

0:43:49.480 --> 0:43:52.640
<v Speaker 5>under ten right now, but that's not it. It's her impact

0:43:53.080 --> 0:43:56.720
<v Speaker 5>that I've seen every single day on the New York Liberty.

0:43:57.160 --> 0:44:01.120
<v Speaker 5>And again, when you consider a teams for to repeat

0:44:01.640 --> 0:44:04.160
<v Speaker 5>as champions.

0:44:04.120 --> 0:44:05.440
<v Speaker 6>That can't be overstated.

0:44:05.960 --> 0:44:09.239
<v Speaker 5>So they don't even need her output to be crazy, like,

0:44:09.280 --> 0:44:11.840
<v Speaker 5>they don't need her to put up, you know, fifteen

0:44:11.880 --> 0:44:14.919
<v Speaker 5>points a game. So so that output, I mean, she's

0:44:15.000 --> 0:44:18.480
<v Speaker 5>where she should be. And so yeah, I think Natasha

0:44:18.480 --> 0:44:20.680
<v Speaker 5>Clouds fit with the New York Liberty and her impact

0:44:20.719 --> 0:44:23.120
<v Speaker 5>on the Liberty so far is what's impressed me most.

0:44:23.480 --> 0:44:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I totally agree, especially because we often say about

0:44:26.000 --> 0:44:28.160
<v Speaker 1>teams there's only one ball, and on that team there

0:44:28.160 --> 0:44:30.919
<v Speaker 1>are so many people who could be trying to buy

0:44:31.040 --> 0:44:32.440
<v Speaker 1>for it and try to be the star, and it

0:44:32.480 --> 0:44:34.920
<v Speaker 1>said they're all working so well together. I also think

0:44:35.000 --> 0:44:38.239
<v Speaker 1>Kiki erie Fen and Sonya Citron because for all the

0:44:38.280 --> 0:44:40.520
<v Speaker 1>talk that we have that is very true about how

0:44:40.560 --> 0:44:42.719
<v Speaker 1>hard it is to make this lead to even be

0:44:42.840 --> 0:44:46.120
<v Speaker 1>on a roster, for them to be playing the way

0:44:46.160 --> 0:44:48.880
<v Speaker 1>they are has been a revelation.

0:44:50.200 --> 0:44:53.640
<v Speaker 5>Completely agree, completely agree, because aside from the Golden State

0:44:53.719 --> 0:44:57.240
<v Speaker 5>Valkyries the Washington Mystics. We're going to be another team

0:44:57.360 --> 0:45:00.520
<v Speaker 5>that has surprised me early on, and it's because of

0:45:00.560 --> 0:45:03.280
<v Speaker 5>the contributions from both of them, especially.

0:45:02.880 --> 0:45:06.680
<v Speaker 6>Kiky eria Fan. I think her physicality.

0:45:06.800 --> 0:45:09.719
<v Speaker 5>Again, when you think about rookies and the adjustment and

0:45:09.760 --> 0:45:13.359
<v Speaker 5>you're seeing her out here exude her dominance against some

0:45:13.400 --> 0:45:17.760
<v Speaker 5>of the most dominant players in the WNBA, It's really

0:45:17.840 --> 0:45:21.120
<v Speaker 5>got me excited to see where her career goes from here,

0:45:21.160 --> 0:45:24.680
<v Speaker 5>because my god, I mean, I think she's she could

0:45:24.680 --> 0:45:27.240
<v Speaker 5>be in the conversation for Rookie of the Year.

0:45:27.680 --> 0:45:29.040
<v Speaker 2>Both of them. It's pretty impressive.

0:45:29.880 --> 0:45:31.560
<v Speaker 1>We have to take a quick break more with Annie

0:45:31.560 --> 0:45:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Costable right after this. Is there a team more player

0:45:41.800 --> 0:45:43.920
<v Speaker 1>you think that is not being talked about enough. I

0:45:43.920 --> 0:45:46.600
<v Speaker 1>think we all came in with such excitement enthusiasm for

0:45:46.640 --> 0:45:49.760
<v Speaker 1>the Pagebeckers wings story, and the concussion and the illness

0:45:49.800 --> 0:45:51.520
<v Speaker 1>has sort of slowed down us getting a chance to

0:45:51.520 --> 0:45:54.440
<v Speaker 1>really watch how that might change anything else that you're like, Oh,

0:45:54.480 --> 0:45:56.160
<v Speaker 1>why is it? Why aren't people focused on this or

0:45:56.160 --> 0:45:56.680
<v Speaker 1>talking about this?

0:45:57.160 --> 0:45:57.719
<v Speaker 6>Oh my god.

0:45:57.800 --> 0:46:01.600
<v Speaker 5>I could go through like a whole list, but one

0:46:01.719 --> 0:46:05.319
<v Speaker 5>thing I really wish people were talking about more is

0:46:05.400 --> 0:46:11.160
<v Speaker 5>Kelsey Plum and what exactly prompted this trade request, why

0:46:11.280 --> 0:46:13.400
<v Speaker 5>it was time for her to get out of Las Vegas.

0:46:13.840 --> 0:46:15.000
<v Speaker 6>And I'll tell you why.

0:46:15.840 --> 0:46:16.120
<v Speaker 5>I'm not.

0:46:16.880 --> 0:46:19.239
<v Speaker 6>I'm not like trying to stir the pot.

0:46:19.360 --> 0:46:22.520
<v Speaker 5>I'm not trying to bring up drama or you know,

0:46:23.440 --> 0:46:26.040
<v Speaker 5>I don't know, encourage some tabloidy reporting.

0:46:26.160 --> 0:46:27.879
<v Speaker 6>What I'm saying interests me.

0:46:28.160 --> 0:46:32.839
<v Speaker 5>Is if you compare the situation to an NBA franchise, right,

0:46:33.560 --> 0:46:38.320
<v Speaker 5>and you see a championship team start to kind of deteriorate,

0:46:38.800 --> 0:46:42.160
<v Speaker 5>the why always gets talked about. It gets talked about

0:46:42.200 --> 0:46:44.840
<v Speaker 5>so much that you're like, can we stop talking about this?

0:46:45.080 --> 0:46:45.279
<v Speaker 6>Right?

0:46:45.760 --> 0:46:50.040
<v Speaker 5>And so with Kelsey, I think something that was on

0:46:50.080 --> 0:46:54.640
<v Speaker 5>the outside looked so obvious was how strong of a

0:46:54.680 --> 0:46:59.160
<v Speaker 5>connection the Aces that Aces team had and then all

0:46:59.200 --> 0:47:04.960
<v Speaker 5>of a sudden it was gone. And I think that's

0:47:05.000 --> 0:47:05.400
<v Speaker 5>something we.

0:47:05.800 --> 0:47:06.839
<v Speaker 6>Should be talking about. Why.

0:47:06.920 --> 0:47:10.160
<v Speaker 5>And then when you consider how well she's doing in

0:47:10.320 --> 0:47:13.560
<v Speaker 5>LA I mean, I just I want to know why.

0:47:13.920 --> 0:47:14.960
<v Speaker 2>Okay, last question for you.

0:47:15.040 --> 0:47:17.320
<v Speaker 1>I think I've been having these conversations a lot of

0:47:17.400 --> 0:47:19.600
<v Speaker 1>late with either guests or folks who are interviewing me

0:47:19.600 --> 0:47:22.960
<v Speaker 1>for pieces they're writing it feels like some WNBA teams

0:47:23.160 --> 0:47:26.520
<v Speaker 1>still seem to operate from a defensive place, and I

0:47:26.520 --> 0:47:30.120
<v Speaker 1>don't know if that's an attempt at good business, smart

0:47:30.160 --> 0:47:32.480
<v Speaker 1>business considering last year's mess. I don't know if they

0:47:32.560 --> 0:47:35.960
<v Speaker 1>think they're protecting their players. But sometimes it feels like,

0:47:36.000 --> 0:47:40.239
<v Speaker 1>whether it's intentional or perhaps it's the result of a

0:47:40.320 --> 0:47:43.920
<v Speaker 1>lack of bandwidth or resources or whatever, that some WNBA

0:47:43.960 --> 0:47:46.520
<v Speaker 1>teams make it hard for folks to cover them. They

0:47:46.520 --> 0:47:51.160
<v Speaker 1>make it hard for people to ask sophisticated, sometimes critical

0:47:51.239 --> 0:47:55.799
<v Speaker 1>questions and to give sophisticated, sometimes critical coverage. How do

0:47:55.840 --> 0:47:59.200
<v Speaker 1>we get teams to welcome that and understand the necessity

0:47:59.239 --> 0:48:01.920
<v Speaker 1>of that if the w and Women's Sports wants to

0:48:01.920 --> 0:48:05.000
<v Speaker 1>take its place among the biggest and most profitable men's

0:48:05.040 --> 0:48:05.760
<v Speaker 1>professional leagues.

0:48:06.800 --> 0:48:10.239
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I really appreciate this question because it's something that

0:48:10.560 --> 0:48:14.000
<v Speaker 5>pisses me off to no end, not even just from

0:48:14.040 --> 0:48:16.600
<v Speaker 5>the teams, but from the league as a whole. There's

0:48:16.640 --> 0:48:20.160
<v Speaker 5>a transparency issue. And when I say transparency issue, I

0:48:20.200 --> 0:48:24.640
<v Speaker 5>mean the simplest thing as far as you know, a

0:48:24.719 --> 0:48:29.080
<v Speaker 5>coach getting fined, to you know, details about an investigation.

0:48:29.520 --> 0:48:32.560
<v Speaker 5>It's there's so much that you have to jump through

0:48:32.600 --> 0:48:35.239
<v Speaker 5>a million hoops to get the correct information out, and

0:48:35.280 --> 0:48:41.200
<v Speaker 5>it leads to, you know, errors in reporting, which is

0:48:41.280 --> 0:48:45.920
<v Speaker 5>understandable again because there's like a transparency, but also it

0:48:46.160 --> 0:48:51.840
<v Speaker 5>just it. I think it conflates the feelings of attack

0:48:52.400 --> 0:48:56.360
<v Speaker 5>versus understanding, Oh, these people are.

0:48:56.239 --> 0:48:57.000
<v Speaker 6>Doing their job.

0:48:57.200 --> 0:49:02.279
<v Speaker 5>And so I think the way that it changes from

0:49:02.280 --> 0:49:08.120
<v Speaker 5>a team standpoint, from a franchise standpoint is when certain franchises.

0:49:07.400 --> 0:49:08.960
<v Speaker 6>Force the others to rise.

0:49:09.480 --> 0:49:12.920
<v Speaker 5>And I say that having experienced obviously working with multiple

0:49:12.920 --> 0:49:20.560
<v Speaker 5>franchises PR staffs, and the difference from some versus the

0:49:20.560 --> 0:49:24.520
<v Speaker 5>others is astounding, not only in the way that they

0:49:25.160 --> 0:49:29.319
<v Speaker 5>receive critical coverage or or even allow their players to

0:49:29.400 --> 0:49:31.680
<v Speaker 5>receive critical coverage, or their coaches.

0:49:31.719 --> 0:49:32.520
<v Speaker 6>Because here's the thing.

0:49:33.040 --> 0:49:36.000
<v Speaker 5>If I ask a question that Sandy Brondelo does not like,

0:49:36.320 --> 0:49:38.239
<v Speaker 5>she is well within her right to look me in

0:49:38.280 --> 0:49:41.000
<v Speaker 5>the face and say I don't like that question. You know,

0:49:41.040 --> 0:49:44.600
<v Speaker 5>no comment, I have nothing to say. But if a

0:49:44.640 --> 0:49:47.520
<v Speaker 5>PR person is stepping in and answering for her, it

0:49:47.560 --> 0:49:50.800
<v Speaker 5>immediately becomes an issue of what are you hiding?

0:49:50.880 --> 0:49:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's very pale Belichick, Jordan, how did you meet?

0:49:54.120 --> 0:49:55.520
<v Speaker 1>We're not going to talk about that. I thought you

0:49:55.560 --> 0:49:57.280
<v Speaker 1>said it was on a plane. Now we're all very.

0:49:57.160 --> 0:50:01.759
<v Speaker 5>Curious exactly exactly, and so so I think that's what

0:50:02.040 --> 0:50:04.480
<v Speaker 5>certain franchises have to get a little bit more comfortable with,

0:50:04.719 --> 0:50:09.880
<v Speaker 5>is let the player express themselves, let the coach express themselves,

0:50:09.880 --> 0:50:13.880
<v Speaker 5>and let these adults in these situations, you know, handle

0:50:14.000 --> 0:50:17.680
<v Speaker 5>each other professionally. And I think some of these franchises

0:50:17.760 --> 0:50:21.080
<v Speaker 5>will be surprised that the world will not end when

0:50:21.080 --> 0:50:21.560
<v Speaker 5>you do that.

0:50:21.840 --> 0:50:22.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:50:22.080 --> 0:50:24.719
<v Speaker 1>We talked to Elizabeth Williams on this show, and one

0:50:24.760 --> 0:50:26.600
<v Speaker 1>of the things I said is I think that there

0:50:26.640 --> 0:50:30.000
<v Speaker 1>are a number, probably the majority of WNBA athletes that

0:50:30.040 --> 0:50:33.560
<v Speaker 1>are willing to take tough questions and are smart and

0:50:33.600 --> 0:50:36.560
<v Speaker 1>thoughtful and interested in answering them. And then there are

0:50:36.600 --> 0:50:39.560
<v Speaker 1>some that I think have gotten used to sycophantic coverage

0:50:39.760 --> 0:50:44.920
<v Speaker 1>and soft coverage and push back against legitimate reporting that

0:50:45.080 --> 0:50:48.960
<v Speaker 1>elevates the sport because they just it because it sucks

0:50:48.960 --> 0:50:51.319
<v Speaker 1>and it's hard, and you're competitive and you're pissed that

0:50:51.360 --> 0:50:53.680
<v Speaker 1>you lost or you had a bad game. But asking

0:50:53.719 --> 0:50:55.440
<v Speaker 1>someone about a bad game if they were zero for

0:50:55.560 --> 0:50:58.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty is how sports works. And I just don't think

0:50:58.719 --> 0:51:02.879
<v Speaker 1>women's sports will be the space that they desire all

0:51:02.880 --> 0:51:06.759
<v Speaker 1>the benefits of if they can't also face that part

0:51:06.760 --> 0:51:07.200
<v Speaker 1>of it.

0:51:09.040 --> 0:51:11.160
<v Speaker 5>I completely agree with you, And just to add to this,

0:51:11.239 --> 0:51:13.120
<v Speaker 5>I think it starts at the college level. I mean,

0:51:13.120 --> 0:51:15.960
<v Speaker 5>you've got to consider some of these college coaches and

0:51:16.040 --> 0:51:20.879
<v Speaker 5>how they're educating their players on media access and how

0:51:20.920 --> 0:51:23.880
<v Speaker 5>to handle the media. And I'm not saying that this

0:51:24.080 --> 0:51:26.840
<v Speaker 5>is easy by any means, Like I am not trying

0:51:26.880 --> 0:51:29.959
<v Speaker 5>to take away from the fact that these players these

0:51:29.960 --> 0:51:32.480
<v Speaker 5>coaches are showing up on good and bad days and

0:51:32.520 --> 0:51:34.799
<v Speaker 5>being asked to talk about it. I know on my

0:51:34.920 --> 0:51:39.600
<v Speaker 5>worst day, I would not handle it well. If someone's like, hey, Annie,

0:51:39.880 --> 0:51:42.120
<v Speaker 5>why did you do X, Y and Z instead of

0:51:42.280 --> 0:51:42.799
<v Speaker 5>X Y and Z?

0:51:43.760 --> 0:51:44.960
<v Speaker 6>I would have an attitude.

0:51:45.000 --> 0:51:48.440
<v Speaker 5>And that's why I'm fully supportive of players and coaches

0:51:48.480 --> 0:51:50.520
<v Speaker 5>expressing themselves however they see fit.

0:51:50.960 --> 0:51:53.160
<v Speaker 6>But you can't protect.

0:51:52.680 --> 0:51:57.640
<v Speaker 5>Them from this space in which they entered and are

0:51:57.680 --> 0:52:01.680
<v Speaker 5>also fully equipped to handle a professional athletes. It does

0:52:01.719 --> 0:52:06.640
<v Speaker 5>them no good to handhold and baby in my opinion,

0:52:07.040 --> 0:52:09.120
<v Speaker 5>and so I agree with you. In order for women's

0:52:09.120 --> 0:52:12.920
<v Speaker 5>sports to elevate, to continue to grow, it requires the

0:52:13.000 --> 0:52:19.560
<v Speaker 5>critical coverage, It requires transparency, It requires proper media attention,

0:52:19.840 --> 0:52:23.880
<v Speaker 5>and so I think again, and it requires teams holding

0:52:23.920 --> 0:52:27.880
<v Speaker 5>others accountable. If certain franchises elevate to a certain level,

0:52:28.200 --> 0:52:30.439
<v Speaker 5>it's going to forces to rise to be done.

0:52:30.520 --> 0:52:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I do want to add the caveat that

0:52:32.480 --> 0:52:36.359
<v Speaker 1>it's a symbiotic relationship between reporters and athletes. You need

0:52:36.400 --> 0:52:40.600
<v Speaker 1>to be prepared, educated, ask good questions, ask smart questions,

0:52:40.680 --> 0:52:43.719
<v Speaker 1>understand the nuance, understand the intersectionality of women's sports, so

0:52:43.719 --> 0:52:45.680
<v Speaker 1>that when you show up and you do ask tough,

0:52:45.719 --> 0:52:49.640
<v Speaker 1>critical questions, they know that they're being asked in good faith. That,

0:52:49.960 --> 0:52:52.480
<v Speaker 1>of course, is why some athletes already are in a

0:52:52.520 --> 0:52:55.239
<v Speaker 1>position to maybe feel defensive, because it hasn't always been

0:52:55.280 --> 0:52:58.520
<v Speaker 1>a space where people were sending their best and the

0:52:58.600 --> 0:53:01.359
<v Speaker 1>reporters were doing their best. So I get hey, and

0:53:01.400 --> 0:53:04.920
<v Speaker 1>that's worth commenting on for sure, But also, nothing is

0:53:05.000 --> 0:53:07.520
<v Speaker 1>fixed and the future doesn't look any better if everybody

0:53:07.640 --> 0:53:09.680
<v Speaker 1>enters with the assumption that the other one is operating

0:53:09.680 --> 0:53:11.640
<v Speaker 1>in bad faith. There needs to be an agreement to

0:53:12.200 --> 0:53:14.719
<v Speaker 1>move forward where both media and athletes and teams and

0:53:14.800 --> 0:53:18.680
<v Speaker 1>leagues are all in pursuit of more sophisticated coverage, because

0:53:18.719 --> 0:53:19.720
<v Speaker 1>that's what the league deserves.

0:53:19.719 --> 0:53:24.600
<v Speaker 6>That's what these players deserve exactly. I fully support that statement.

0:53:25.760 --> 0:53:29.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm Sarah Spain and I paid for this message. Spain

0:53:29.680 --> 0:53:32.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty eighth. Annie, we always love to have you.

0:53:32.920 --> 0:53:35.160
<v Speaker 1>Thanks so much for coming on. I'm sorry that you

0:53:35.160 --> 0:53:36.919
<v Speaker 1>missed Chicago so much that you have to lie about

0:53:36.960 --> 0:53:38.640
<v Speaker 1>how much you like New York, but I accept it.

0:53:40.440 --> 0:53:44.000
<v Speaker 6>Listen, maybe one day I'll be back. Maybe maybe.

0:53:45.600 --> 0:53:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Thanks to Annie for taking the time and trying to

0:53:47.640 --> 0:53:49.880
<v Speaker 1>spill the tea, we have to take another break when

0:53:49.920 --> 0:53:50.359
<v Speaker 1>we come back.

0:53:50.400 --> 0:53:53.200
<v Speaker 2>The teams that make y'all proud of Pride stick.

0:53:53.000 --> 0:54:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Around welcome backslices. We love that you're listening, but we

0:54:02.560 --> 0:54:04.040
<v Speaker 1>want you to get in the game every day too.

0:54:04.080 --> 0:54:06.239
<v Speaker 1>So here's our good game play of the day. Let

0:54:06.360 --> 0:54:09.879
<v Speaker 1>us know what Pride activations you've seen and loved so far.

0:54:10.280 --> 0:54:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Were you part of Angel City's Pink Pony Club TFO?

0:54:13.160 --> 0:54:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Are you obsessed with the Pride t shirts? Retired goalkeeper

0:54:15.920 --> 0:54:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Nicole Barnhardt designed something else. Let us know you know,

0:54:19.440 --> 0:54:20.880
<v Speaker 1>we love to hear from you, and we want to

0:54:20.880 --> 0:54:22.640
<v Speaker 1>share some of the teams that are doing it right,

0:54:22.800 --> 0:54:25.319
<v Speaker 1>some of the athletes that are doing it best. You

0:54:25.320 --> 0:54:26.680
<v Speaker 1>could also let us know if you think your team

0:54:26.719 --> 0:54:30.319
<v Speaker 1>missed the mark. Looking at you, Boston Legacy. Ah, we

0:54:30.320 --> 0:54:32.600
<v Speaker 1>were so excited about the logo finally being released and

0:54:32.600 --> 0:54:35.200
<v Speaker 1>something to celebrate, but I don't know if you all

0:54:35.200 --> 0:54:37.960
<v Speaker 1>saw this. The club initially announced some Pride merch, saying

0:54:37.960 --> 0:54:40.279
<v Speaker 1>that money from sales would be quote donated to a

0:54:40.320 --> 0:54:44.560
<v Speaker 1>local LGBTQ plus nonprofit that's committed to social justice and creating,

0:54:44.600 --> 0:54:47.880
<v Speaker 1>sustaining and advocating for programs, policies, and services that support

0:54:47.880 --> 0:54:53.400
<v Speaker 1>the LGBT community. End quote sounds great? Which one is

0:54:53.440 --> 0:54:56.480
<v Speaker 1>what many people asked, but the team didn't say which

0:54:56.520 --> 0:54:59.320
<v Speaker 1>nonprofit was getting those funds, and it appears that the

0:54:59.360 --> 0:55:02.799
<v Speaker 1>team is now leaded the post. The pride gear is

0:55:02.840 --> 0:55:06.480
<v Speaker 1>still available on the Boston Legacy store. The nonprofit name

0:55:06.520 --> 0:55:09.560
<v Speaker 1>is still Mia. Feels like we're at a Blue Family

0:55:09.560 --> 0:55:12.560
<v Speaker 1>gala over here or about to donate to the Human

0:55:12.600 --> 0:55:15.759
<v Speaker 1>Fund if you know, you know, either way, the merch

0:55:15.880 --> 0:55:19.200
<v Speaker 1>is cool. We love the idea of Boston Legacy. Just

0:55:19.320 --> 0:55:22.600
<v Speaker 1>let us know who you're supporting. Hit us up on email,

0:55:22.640 --> 0:55:25.160
<v Speaker 1>y'all good game at wondermedianetwork dot com, or leave us

0:55:25.160 --> 0:55:27.720
<v Speaker 1>a voicemail at eight seven two, two, four, fifty, seventy

0:55:28.160 --> 0:55:28.680
<v Speaker 1>and don't.

0:55:28.480 --> 0:55:31.319
<v Speaker 2>Forget to subscribe, rate and review It's easy.

0:55:31.120 --> 0:55:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Watch the US Women's the Soccer Tournament coach using her

0:55:34.760 --> 0:55:39.080
<v Speaker 1>prize money from last year's TST championship for IVF, rating

0:55:39.160 --> 0:55:43.200
<v Speaker 1>ten out of ten happy crying emojis. Review Ooh, y'all,

0:55:43.200 --> 0:55:45.160
<v Speaker 1>this was a bona fide feel good moment.

0:55:45.239 --> 0:55:46.000
<v Speaker 2>So okay.

0:55:46.040 --> 0:55:48.879
<v Speaker 1>The Soccer Tournament seventy seven winner take all event took

0:55:48.880 --> 0:55:51.239
<v Speaker 1>place from June fourth through the ninth, consisting of eight

0:55:51.280 --> 0:55:54.000
<v Speaker 1>women's teams, one of which was called the US women.

0:55:54.360 --> 0:55:56.280
<v Speaker 2>That squad pretty stacked.

0:55:56.520 --> 0:55:58.920
<v Speaker 1>The roster included names like Friend of the Show, Joe Luyden,

0:55:59.120 --> 0:56:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Carly Lloyd, Elly Kreeger, Heather O'Reilly.

0:56:01.680 --> 0:56:03.120
<v Speaker 2>You get the picture anyway.

0:56:03.239 --> 0:56:05.879
<v Speaker 1>Former North Carolina courage Stark Kendall Fletcher is the head

0:56:05.920 --> 0:56:08.239
<v Speaker 1>coach of that US Women's squad and led him to

0:56:08.280 --> 0:56:12.160
<v Speaker 1>a second straight TST championship on Monday, while pregnant with

0:56:12.200 --> 0:56:15.520
<v Speaker 1>a little one. TST posted a video of Fletcher addressing

0:56:15.560 --> 0:56:17.840
<v Speaker 1>the team after the win, and in it, she revealed

0:56:17.840 --> 0:56:20.040
<v Speaker 1>that she'd used her chunk of the team's million dollar

0:56:20.080 --> 0:56:23.960
<v Speaker 1>cash prize from last year's TST Championship on IVF and

0:56:24.000 --> 0:56:26.560
<v Speaker 1>that the baby in her very belly was a result

0:56:26.600 --> 0:56:30.440
<v Speaker 1>of that process. OMG, you have to watch the video.

0:56:30.760 --> 0:56:32.719
<v Speaker 1>We'll link to it in the show notes. First watch

0:56:32.719 --> 0:56:34.800
<v Speaker 1>it for Kendall, then watch it for all the player

0:56:34.840 --> 0:56:37.480
<v Speaker 1>reactions in the background. Such a beautiful moment for that

0:56:37.520 --> 0:56:40.279
<v Speaker 1>group and not a bad payday. Now it's your turn,

0:56:40.480 --> 0:56:43.000
<v Speaker 1>rate and review. Thanks for listening, y'all. See you tomorrow.

0:56:43.040 --> 0:56:45.640
<v Speaker 1>When we talked to Howard Megdohl about his contributions to

0:56:45.680 --> 0:56:48.360
<v Speaker 1>the women's sports landscape and his new book about Caitlin Clark,

0:56:48.920 --> 0:56:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Good Game, Annie, Good Game, Ali Quigley, Hugh Ice, Forever

0:56:54.239 --> 0:56:58.440
<v Speaker 1>and Ever and Ever. Good Game with Sarah Spain is

0:56:58.480 --> 0:57:01.359
<v Speaker 1>an iHeart women's sports production in partnership with Deep Blue

0:57:01.360 --> 0:57:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Sports and Entertainment. You can find us on the iHeartRadio app,

0:57:04.560 --> 0:57:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Production by

0:57:08.040 --> 0:57:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Wonder Media Network, our producers are Alex Azzie and Misha Jones.

0:57:12.160 --> 0:57:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Our executive producers are Christina Everett, Jesse Katz, Jenny Kaplan,

0:57:16.000 --> 0:57:19.600
<v Speaker 1>and Emily Rutterer. Our editors are Emily Rutterer, Britney Martinez,

0:57:19.640 --> 0:57:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Grace Lynch, and Gianna Palmer, Our associate producer is Lucy Jones,

0:57:23.720 --> 0:57:25.440
<v Speaker 1>and I'm Your Host Sarah Spain.