Speaker 1: All right, gladuate with us. I don't know if you
Speaker 1: can say happy Friday. Let's say good Friday to you,
Speaker 1: eight hundred and nine. Put one Sean, you want to
Speaker 1: be a part of the program. We've got the project
Speaker 1: Veritas leaked video of at Jack that's the CEO of Twitter,
Speaker 1: Jack Dorsey, and his discussions to ban Trump and then
Speaker 1: so much more. And it has implications. This whole cancel culture, silence, smears, slander,
Speaker 1: besmirch movement is getting more insane by the minute. Our
Speaker 1: friend Ammy Harowitz will join us today an incredible tape
Speaker 1: on the streets of New York. Yeah, so that there
Speaker 1: are areas we can compromise. Guess what about this issue?
Speaker 1: Hell no, hell no, hell no. You know, if it's
Speaker 1: a conservative issue, we gotta climate change. No way, there
Speaker 1: is no compromise, No compromise, Havid, the prestigious university now
Speaker 1: wants to revoke Trump graduates diplomas. I mean, it's this
Speaker 1: is how nuts. This is targeting the likes of Senator
Speaker 1: Ted Cruz and Kaylee Mcinaney and Representative Crenshaw. And remember
Speaker 1: last year they tried to ban any Trump administration official
Speaker 1: from even speaking at Havid now they're circulating a petition
Speaker 1: that wants to revoke degrees already granted and given and
Speaker 1: earned two former students. I guess you know will retroactively
Speaker 1: cancel you. I mean, this is how nuts this is.
Speaker 1: We're following the story and just the news is just
Speaker 1: the news. Dot COM's editor in chief John Solomon on
Speaker 1: this declassification issues a big, big deal. Look, there now
Speaker 1: is more evidence than ever before why you don't have
Speaker 1: a snap impeachment, a rush to judgment. I have spent
Speaker 1: a lot of time on this program chronicling example after
Speaker 1: example of how I personally and my team individually personally
Speaker 1: both ways radio and TV, you know, and a lot
Speaker 1: of times even have intramural skirmishes on stuff. Because we
Speaker 1: have information, We're ready to go with information, and for
Speaker 1: one reason or another, I'm not ready to go. And
Speaker 1: it's too because we want to be that right and
Speaker 1: we want to be that careful. It's not an accident
Speaker 1: that the mob media and Democrats almost always rush to
Speaker 1: judgment and get things wrong, and that we wait patiently.
Speaker 1: And there's been a lot of information that has been
Speaker 1: fed to me in the days since what happened on
Speaker 1: January the sixth, some of which that is now proving
Speaker 1: to be true. I have sources everywhere, and but yet
Speaker 1: we've not been able to go with it because we
Speaker 1: don't have enough corroboration and we don't go off half
Speaker 1: cocked and we confirm, you know, multiple ways sources and
Speaker 1: information that we're getting, we just don't run with it.
Speaker 1: Did the same on the issues involving, you know, the
Speaker 1: questions of election integrity, did the same thing. People angry
Speaker 1: at me, Well, you gotta go with this tonight. I'm like, no,
Speaker 1: I don't until I independently corroborated or ended up serving
Speaker 1: me well again, but that's that's, you know, and we
Speaker 1: focused on the things that we absolutely could point out.
Speaker 1: You know, it's you know, we have a snap impeachment
Speaker 1: and now it's it's just you know, it is it
Speaker 1: is so dangerous to the country and so unfair and
Speaker 1: you can't even believe that this could happen, but it's happened,
Speaker 1: and you know where we stand is just you know,
Speaker 1: for example, the president, what did he say, President, Now
Speaker 1: it's repeatedly said, he said on January sixth, many of
Speaker 1: you will peacefully and patriotically march to the Capitol to
Speaker 1: let your voices be heard. I know that everyone here
Speaker 1: will soon be marching over to the Capitol Building to
Speaker 1: peacefully and patriotically make your voices hurt. That's what it was.
Speaker 1: Right now. The Democrats are all calling for come and
Speaker 1: the President said, in light of reports of more demonstrations,
Speaker 1: he said, since I urged there'd be no violence, no
Speaker 1: law breaking, no vandalism of any kind. Let me reiterate
Speaker 1: that point. From my point of view. A lot of people,
Speaker 1: a lot of talk about people, you know, looking to protest.
Speaker 1: I'm all for peaceful protests. But if you if you
Speaker 1: go to one and you're peaceful and your intentions are
Speaker 1: only to be peaceful, which is the vast majority. Even
Speaker 1: over the summer, it was the vast majority of people,
Speaker 1: not the agitators and the rioters and the looters and
Speaker 1: people throwing molotov cocktails and bricks and frozen water bottles
Speaker 1: of cops and taking over city blocks and burning down
Speaker 1: police precincts and taking over police precincts. That was not
Speaker 1: the vast majority of people. And if you're going to
Speaker 1: do it, du it peacefully. If you see lunatics are
Speaker 1: beginning to take over, go home. I mean don't ever
Speaker 1: be a part of it. And for the people that
Speaker 1: got caught up and raiding the Capitol, like we said,
Speaker 1: they're all going to pay a price as they should
Speaker 1: and just so should the people over the summer. And
Speaker 1: it's an important thing. Well, you know, what is this
Speaker 1: flash impeachment all about? What are we now looking at?
Speaker 1: Because as we now look at how quickly the Democrats
Speaker 1: race to impeachment, you know, they're not going to have it.
Speaker 1: There's no way time wise, they're gonna have a trial
Speaker 1: in the Senate. And the earliest it could be brought up,
Speaker 1: and I confirmed this myself with Mitch McConnell's office, is
Speaker 1: one pm on January twentieth. In other words, that's the earliest,
Speaker 1: the earliest it can be transmitted. As on January nineteenth,
Speaker 1: Donald Trump won't be a president. So they're talking about
Speaker 1: a post impeachment trial, a post presidency impeachment trial. You know,
Speaker 1: there's been a lot of people, including the great one
Speaker 1: Mark Levine, including Alan Dershwitz. I believe Jonathan Turley, one
Speaker 1: former federal judge long serving. Once Trump leaves office, the
Speaker 1: Senate can't hold an impeachment trial. It would be unconstitutional.
Speaker 1: So what's the point of all this? What they go
Speaker 1: to go home and brag that, oh, we impeached Donald
Speaker 1: Trump twice, but it's a snap impeachment. Now, remember what
Speaker 1: the president said, because words have meaning peacefully, patriotically make
Speaker 1: your voices heard. But according to the Democrats, that's their
Speaker 1: new standard for inciting violence and insurrection their favorite new word, insurrection.
Speaker 1: Now we've gone through you know, I'm gonna take Donald
Speaker 1: Trump out to night, Maxie Waters get in their faces
Speaker 1: all of this, Ted Low, he supported widespread civil unrest
Speaker 1: against the president. You know, I love. They got an
Speaker 1: impeachment manager in Eric Swalwell. As if it wasn't bad enough,
Speaker 1: his relationship long term relationship with a Chinese spy. Lead
Speaker 1: impeachment manager appointed by Pelosi objected to the twenty seventeen
Speaker 1: electoral vote certification. This guy, Jamie Raskin, I'm like, oh,
Speaker 1: could it be it? Can we have any more irony
Speaker 1: as it relates to all of this, their own standards
Speaker 1: comparing the president, you know, to Sama bin Laden that's
Speaker 1: not incitement. Or let's see the threat by Chucky Schumer
Speaker 1: against Gorsas and Kavanaugh, which we played over and over again,
Speaker 1: or the comments of Kamala Harris that we've played over
Speaker 1: and over again. You know, under the Democrats' own standards,
Speaker 1: as I've been saying, they all should be impeached. On Wednesday,
Speaker 1: the second they're in office, and two weeks after, you know,
Speaker 1: violent rioters are storming you know, the White House grounds
Speaker 1: if you remember, and rioters burned to Minneapolis police station.
Speaker 1: Is when Kamala Harris was out there saying it's not
Speaker 1: going to stop, shouldn't stop, we won't stop. You know. Okay,
Speaker 1: that's says literally all of this was unfolding and calm
Speaker 1: voices needed to be heard. Then she promotes some bail
Speaker 1: fund to get violent rioters out of jail. Now, if
Speaker 1: that's the case, if those standards are applied to them,
Speaker 1: well we know what would happen. But it's not going
Speaker 1: to work that way, is it? And I don't even
Speaker 1: support it. I'm saying if they applied their own standards
Speaker 1: to themselves, they would all be impeached. It's unbelievable hypocrisy
Speaker 1: and the hatred of rage against this president. The psychosis
Speaker 1: never ends under any circumstances. They had a chance on
Speaker 1: the left to speak out against their radical base rioting,
Speaker 1: but they didn't want to alienate their base. They wanted
Speaker 1: their votes. So that's why the silence was deafening, the
Speaker 1: excuse making breathtaking the hypocrisy. Now the stench goes to
Speaker 1: high heaven. You know, we have cities burning and with
Speaker 1: anger and fury and rage, and you know, member Hillary
Speaker 1: Clinton said that Donald Trump was an illegitimate president. It
Speaker 1: Anci Pelosi said the twenty sixteen elections were hijacked by Russia.
Speaker 1: All these, all of this, there was no outrage against
Speaker 1: the phony bought and paid for Russian disinformation dossier. Four
Speaker 1: separate investigations, Oh yeah, not one of them. They all
Speaker 1: cleared Donald Trump the only Russian interference with Hillary dossier
Speaker 1: and then used as a verified the main source for
Speaker 1: FISA applications to spy on candidate Trump and President Trump.
Speaker 1: They spied on him for a year. So and now
Speaker 1: we find out when there's new information that's going to
Speaker 1: be declassified and revealed, a big part of it is
Speaker 1: going to point to Christopher Steele being debriefed and saying
Speaker 1: that he actually told the FBI he was leaking because
Speaker 1: he needed to help Hillary overcome or email problem, which
Speaker 1: was real. That's how deep that conspiracy that's real goes
Speaker 1: or the top source of steel acknowledging to the FBI
Speaker 1: in January twenty seventeen. None of the this is real.
Speaker 1: It was bar talk. And still they were filing FISA
Speaker 1: applications and lying to a FISA court. That's why it's
Speaker 1: premeditated broad you know, it's it's really these are scary
Speaker 1: times to me and the we don't have equal justice,
Speaker 1: we don't have equal application of our laws. None of
Speaker 1: this is going to be None of these standards will
Speaker 1: be applied to any Democrat ever. And think how crazy
Speaker 1: it is. It's you know, you got the first impeachment
Speaker 1: what an anonymous hearsay whistleblower that's not even a whistleblower.
Speaker 1: But we won't listen to people that sign affidavits as
Speaker 1: it relates to what they saw on election day under
Speaker 1: penalty of perjury. Won't even talk to them. We don't
Speaker 1: want to hear from them. They're not courageous and patriotic whistleblowers, apparently,
Speaker 1: And this is now the country that we live in,
Speaker 1: and this is what's happening, and it's sad to me.
Speaker 1: You know, last night, Laura Ingram throws to me, and
Speaker 1: I go, yeah, my heart's troubled. Well it is tlimately,
Speaker 1: you know, as I believe in I have faith. I
Speaker 1: believe in God, a father, a creator, and Jesus's son
Speaker 1: in reconciliation. And we know how the story ends, but
Speaker 1: I don't there's a lot of turmoil if you believe
Speaker 1: what happens just before the story ends. I don't know
Speaker 1: if I want to get to that part ever. It's
Speaker 1: just scary times up is down, down is up, And
Speaker 1: it just wasn't remarkable, as I said the other day,
Speaker 1: and now we're discovering what now I got. Let's see
Speaker 1: the Washington Post in front of me. The outgoing Capitol
Speaker 1: Police chief was begging people before the sixth for the
Speaker 1: National Guard, and the numbers of people that were that
Speaker 1: turned them down were unbelievable. I got. You know, all
Speaker 1: these reports, all these news services quote left wing activists
Speaker 1: charged in Capitol Hill. Riot said that he was just
Speaker 1: there to document. I followed that story, didn't talk about
Speaker 1: it until now it's corroborated because now they've been able
Speaker 1: to find out that he's the subject of a criminal complaint,
Speaker 1: and now we're finding out more details about it. Heard
Speaker 1: egging protesters on in a video that was provided to
Speaker 1: the FBI and shared on YouTube and Twitter of all places,
Speaker 1: about exactly what he's talking about, burned it all down,
Speaker 1: documenting the riots. You know, we got to get this burned.
Speaker 1: It's our house, m whatever. And according to the Affidavid
Speaker 1: signed by the FBI, Well that's a left winger. We'll
Speaker 1: hang on a second, and then we have the Washington
Speaker 1: Times talking about the timeline of all this. Again, we
Speaker 1: didn't rush to judgment. Initial court documents are showing at
Speaker 1: least two suspects arrived on or before January six, armed
Speaker 1: with explosives, tactical gear, and caches of weapons. This was
Speaker 1: a pre planned attack, in other words, not in fired
Speaker 1: by Donald Trump saying many of you will peacefully and
Speaker 1: patriotically let your voices be heard at the Capitol. You
Speaker 1: know it's according to the Washington Post, the FBI quote
Speaker 1: knew beforehand of plans for a quote war at the Capitol.
Speaker 1: This poor police, capitol police chief that resigned. It was
Speaker 1: warning everybody six separate warnings before and day of help.
Speaker 1: Help please help. Just thenews dot com John Solomon will
Speaker 1: weigh in on this. You know, is this not a
Speaker 1: rush to judgment on their part. You know, even fake
Speaker 1: news CNNO investigators are pursuing signs the US Capitol riot
Speaker 1: was planned. That's their headline, the opposite of what they've
Speaker 1: been telling the American people in their support for a
Speaker 1: snap impeachment. You know, I just it's frustrating, to say
Speaker 1: the least, worrisome at a level. I didn't think i'd
Speaker 1: worry about the country in my life. But I can't
Speaker 1: sit here and light to you, tell you how I
Speaker 1: really feel. I got a call from a friend of
Speaker 1: mine in Alabama today and yeah, you know, trying to
Speaker 1: buck me up. I'm like, well, I can't hide out.
Speaker 1: I feel like I got to be honest with my audience.
Speaker 1: I'm honest, all right. As we roll along eight hundred
Speaker 1: and ninety four one, Sean, if you want to be
Speaker 1: a part of the program, you ever think of, like, um,
Speaker 1: did you ever think you'd live in a world like
Speaker 1: it is today? Do you ever think that now we
Speaker 1: rush to judgment, we have a snap impeachment. And you
Speaker 1: go back to the President's speech that day, Okay, what
Speaker 1: did he say? Many of you will peacefully, patriotically go
Speaker 1: to the Capitol. Let your voices be heard that Okay,
Speaker 1: then the very people that want this impeachment, the Chuck
Speaker 1: Schumer's of the world, in front of the Supreme Court building,
Speaker 1: We're coming for you, Gorsuch, and you're not gonna know
Speaker 1: what to hit you. I want to tell you, Cavanaugh,
Speaker 1: you have released the lurlwind. You will pay the price.
Speaker 1: You won't know what hit you if you go forward
Speaker 1: with these awful decisions, pay the prey. You won't know
Speaker 1: what hit you. I won't play it, but you know
Speaker 1: one of the squad members Pressley on msd NC, calling
Speaker 1: for unrest in the streets as long as there's unrest
Speaker 1: in our lives. Acasio Cortez called Americans to occupy airports
Speaker 1: federal law enforcement officers across the country. She actually said
Speaker 1: that encouraging radical supporters breach government buildings. Swallwell so before
Speaker 1: his relationship with the Chinese spy was exposed, threatening gun
Speaker 1: owners with nuclear weapons on Twitter. Then we got Kamala
Speaker 1: Harris and her statements, and then raising money a bail
Speaker 1: fund for rioters on Twitter. And you know, I mean,
Speaker 1: I could go on and on here and I will
Speaker 1: while on the other side of this break, but I'm
Speaker 1: it's you know, now you find out that this whole
Speaker 1: other plan was in place, they rushed to judgment again.
Speaker 1: They got it wrong again. All right, glad you with
Speaker 1: us eight hundred nine for one seawan our toll free
Speaker 1: telephone number if you want to be a part of
Speaker 1: the program. So much going on here, it's crazy, you know,
Speaker 1: brand new reports and I'm citing mainstream media sources now woppo,
Speaker 1: they are a whopper and fake news CNN. I mean,
Speaker 1: it's pretty much all over the place. And and then
Speaker 1: we now have law enforcement sources on the record even
Speaker 1: you know, giving us a little more texture fake news
Speaker 1: CNN even that you know, pursuing signs that all of
Speaker 1: this that happened and the Capitol was planned. That you
Speaker 1: have the chief of police and the Capitol who since resigned.
Speaker 1: I wish he didn't. I mean, it sounds like this
Speaker 1: guy was the only one that was there really fully
Speaker 1: comprehending and understanding that this is a serious situation it's
Speaker 1: got to be dealt with. And the guy's name is
Speaker 1: Capitol Police Chief Stephen's son. And uh, and then you know,
Speaker 1: now we have this this John Sullivan. Left wing activists
Speaker 1: charged in the Capitol and his tape is now out there,
Speaker 1: and that all of this. You know, according to Washington Post,
Speaker 1: the FBI knew beforehand, and why didn't they? Why didn't
Speaker 1: they tell everybody? Why why would the mayor, for example,
Speaker 1: be reluctant in any way to protect our capital. To me,
Speaker 1: this is this takes on a magnitude because the potential
Speaker 1: for far worse. It was horrible, the optics of it
Speaker 1: and everything that happened, and people are being held accountable.
Speaker 1: But you know, we have to remember we have a
Speaker 1: lot of enemies. We got radical as extremists that are
Speaker 1: plotting and planning and scheming every day to hurt people
Speaker 1: and hurt this country and hurt our institutions and the
Speaker 1: you know, after nine to eleven, two thousand and one,
Speaker 1: how could this happens? It's been a question I've been asking,
Speaker 1: and now we're finding out that we have people that
Speaker 1: were warning all over the place and we didn't listen
Speaker 1: to them. And now the Washington Times as they reported
Speaker 1: that on or before January six people armed with these explosives,
Speaker 1: in tactical gear and cashes of weapons. People were posting
Speaker 1: on social media sites all of this could happen, and
Speaker 1: you know, how could we allow that to happen? And
Speaker 1: by the way, we can go back if you want
Speaker 1: to look at past precedent on January twentieth and twenty seventeen,
Speaker 1: for example, bis Pack review at an article In the
Speaker 1: morning of January twentieth, protests over Donald Trump's inauguration turned violent,
Speaker 1: with when anti fascist protesters dressed in black smash storefronts
Speaker 1: and bus stops, and hammered out windows of a limousine
Speaker 1: and eventually launching rocks at police. Fake news CNN reported
Speaker 1: that at the time. They reported also the police were
Speaker 1: forced to respond to the throngs of rioters with flashbangs
Speaker 1: and other crowd controlled devices. I'll be honest, I don't
Speaker 1: really remember all this, but I went back, we checked
Speaker 1: the archives. We got it right. Six police officers reported injured.
Speaker 1: Two hundred and thirty people arrested last inauguration day. But
Speaker 1: in the end, how many of you think those two
Speaker 1: hundred and thirty people that were arrested for what happened
Speaker 1: January twenty seventeen, Not a single rioter that was arrested
Speaker 1: was actually ever tried or convicted. The government dropped all
Speaker 1: charges against more than two hundred and fourteen people arrested
Speaker 1: that day. According to the AP, the motion to dismiss
Speaker 1: charges ends that you know, ended an eighteen month saga.
Speaker 1: According to the APE when they followed up on this
Speaker 1: story that started with the Justice Department attempting to convict
Speaker 1: more than one hundred and ninety people, that Efferman's effort
Speaker 1: saw the government facing off against an intensely coordinated grassroots
Speaker 1: political opposition network that made Washington the focus of nationwide
Speaker 1: support campaign. We've got to protect our capital. We need
Speaker 1: a nine to eleven like commission report here. I know
Speaker 1: they're starting something small, but I don't think it's anywhere
Speaker 1: near enough considering the magnitude and the danger to It.
Speaker 1: Is the people's house. This is our institution. They are
Speaker 1: our elected representatives. Doesn't politics means nothing here. It doesn't
Speaker 1: matter if it's liberal, conservative, Republican or Democrat. But we
Speaker 1: have a serious now rush to judgment, you know, just
Speaker 1: Thenews dot com rush to judgment. Three crucial questions remain unanswered. Well,
Speaker 1: we're beginning to get beginning to get to the bottom
Speaker 1: of it, and a lot of it's not what the
Speaker 1: Russian impeachment told us. And I'm just looking at mainstream
Speaker 1: media sources here. That's it. I thought they would maybe
Speaker 1: like being quoted and these reports and now revealing that
Speaker 1: this could have all been pre planned by by leaders. Now, Hannity,
Speaker 1: are you exonerating those people that raided Not at all.
Speaker 1: We should have held the people in twenty seventeen accountable,
Speaker 1: We should have held everybody over the summer accountable, and
Speaker 1: we should hold everyone here accountable. You got to be
Speaker 1: You can't allow this to happen in this country. It
Speaker 1: just can't. But then it raises then we got the
Speaker 1: double standard issue. We're just going to ignore with Kamala
Speaker 1: Harris and Chuck Schumer had to say, and members of
Speaker 1: the squad had to say in Congresswoman Pressley and Congress'
Speaker 1: Ancasio Cortez and you know, Nancy Pelos, people are gonna
Speaker 1: do what they're gonna do. Really, you know, I don't
Speaker 1: understand nobody in the media cares to report what Kamala
Speaker 1: Harris said in the context of which he said it,
Speaker 1: because if that standard was applied, Democrats would impeach her
Speaker 1: on Wednesday when she when she takes office. They're not
Speaker 1: going to do that, Hannity or a lunatic for saying that,
Speaker 1: how dare you demand equal justice? Never mind what she
Speaker 1: did with accusing Cavanaugh and the horror that was unfolding
Speaker 1: then when she didn't think she'd be the president or
Speaker 1: I guess she was running at the time. I don't
Speaker 1: remember the actual time frame, and getting to the bottom
Speaker 1: of it all. Now, the question for the Senate is, Okay,
Speaker 1: now that we're getting to the bottom of it, why
Speaker 1: would you hold a sham trial post presidency trial that
Speaker 1: many many constitutional scholars are telling us would be unconstitutional
Speaker 1: to begin with? Now, why would you ever be a
Speaker 1: part of it? And that's a question Mitch McConnell should
Speaker 1: have to answer and answer fairly soon in my opinion,
Speaker 1: As you know, this scary times just telling you so
Speaker 1: many different fronts. A Vice President Pence made ann scheduled
Speaker 1: trip to see the National Guard. I'm glad to see
Speaker 1: that stationed at the Capitol right now. I'm glad that
Speaker 1: they're there. Thank them for the service. You got this
Speaker 1: left wing known agitator charged for the role in this
Speaker 1: capitol breach. Dozens on the FBI's terrorist watch list were
Speaker 1: in DC the day of this capitol riot that was
Speaker 1: in the Hill. We got one killing with his own gun.
Speaker 1: That's how scary things got one. DC police been sharing
Speaker 1: his harrowing near death encounter that day. That was on mediaite.
Speaker 1: FBI tracking concerning online buzz now related to inauguration Day.
Speaker 1: I assume that we now have our act together. They're
Speaker 1: here and just this this broad belief that you know,
Speaker 1: are you or how you have you ever been a
Speaker 1: supporter of Donald Trump? It's becoming its now. Harvard wants
Speaker 1: to provoke Trump graduates diplomas. I mean, wow, these are
Speaker 1: chilling times. You know, intelligent security panels to probe lapses
Speaker 1: before the US Capitol rampage. They really want to get
Speaker 1: to the truth of it all because we never got
Speaker 1: to the bottom of the real issue. Now we're getting information.
Speaker 1: And this is another big story today. The President has
Speaker 1: ordered that all of these documents related to Russia Russia
Speaker 1: be declassified and released. I'm told it's over. We'll have
Speaker 1: John Solomon on later to talk about This is more
Speaker 1: than a foot high stack of documents that he's ordered
Speaker 1: released by the Justice Department. These these, you got to know,
Speaker 1: are things that the FBI been trying to keep from
Speaker 1: public view for years. We've been digging, I've I've gotten secondhand,
Speaker 1: third hand reports on what we think is in them.
Speaker 1: I think the most damning that will find is Christopher
Speaker 1: Steele's deep briefings with the FBI. And we already had
Speaker 1: other documents that corroborate this, again released after the fact,
Speaker 1: you know, where in fact he was telling the FBI
Speaker 1: that he actually leaked all of this dossier because he
Speaker 1: needed to help Hillary Clinton cover up for her email problem.
Speaker 1: You know, subpoena and emails deleted, bleach bit, all of that.
Speaker 1: It was a big deal, would be for any of us,
Speaker 1: any of you. I promise you, if your emails are subpoena,
Speaker 1: you better not delete them. I don't even have email anymore.
Speaker 1: On purpose Russia collusion narrative invented. Now we find out
Speaker 1: by Hillary and the dirty dossier, that it was unverifiable
Speaker 1: and now debunked, used to spy in a presidential candidate
Speaker 1: and a president for full year, and of course impact
Speaker 1: the lie of Carter Page caught up in the middle
Speaker 1: of this. Poor Papadopoulos, you know, we were told that
Speaker 1: no spying occurred, and carter Page Stephan Helper, according to sources,
Speaker 1: telling me and that these documents might show that the
Speaker 1: FBI spying on the Trump campaign was real. We were
Speaker 1: told by the highest ranking members of the FBI that
Speaker 1: never happened. You know, this is an institution I personally
Speaker 1: revered my whole life. The two people in my family
Speaker 1: that were in the FBI, As I said, they were
Speaker 1: deity in my family. You know, you when you take
Speaker 1: all of this in you you add to this a
Speaker 1: lot of other things. You add there's no curiosity of
Speaker 1: the media they care about and the Democrats they care
Speaker 1: about Russian collusion, but they don't care about the dirty,
Speaker 1: unverifiable dossier, premeditator fraud on a FISA court. How do
Speaker 1: you believe that they really cared at all? They don't.
Speaker 1: It was just because they were advancing a political agenda.
Speaker 1: And then you can add other nuance to it and
Speaker 1: other big issues that you know, they have this double standard.
Speaker 1: They're not calling out democratic rhetoric in terms of how
Speaker 1: irresponsible it is, and not even playing exactly what they
Speaker 1: say caused their favorite new word, insurrection caused by Donald
Speaker 1: Trump that led to his impeachment. Why aren't they playing
Speaker 1: the tape? Tell us what you heard there that you
Speaker 1: think calls for insurrection? But then you play. I think
Speaker 1: we're the only ones like usual, playing the rhetoric of
Speaker 1: the left and the leadership of the Democratic Party and
Speaker 1: then ignoring the real quid pro quo with Chow in
Speaker 1: the middle of this whole Ooh, the President was pressuring
Speaker 1: the president of Ukraine. There's only one fact witness they
Speaker 1: ever brought in, Only one based on an anonymous hearsay
Speaker 1: whistle blower, not even somebody that had firsthand knowledge. You
Speaker 1: have plenty of opinion witnesses, plenty of hearsay witnesses, no
Speaker 1: fact witnesses. The one fact witness you know, exonerated the president. No,
Speaker 1: he didn't ask for a quid pro quell. Oh, Joe's
Speaker 1: on tape bragging you leveraged the billion dollars. Everybody in
Speaker 1: the media ignored it. Any vetting of Joe Biden take
Speaker 1: place in the lead up to this election? Note not really?
Speaker 1: Was there any vetting of Barack Obama? Notpe not really?
Speaker 1: How many of us really dug deep and exposed and
Speaker 1: were proven right on the whole rush of mess took
Speaker 1: years of our time, all Hannity, you're repetitive. No, we
Speaker 1: were unfolding, unpeeling layers in an onion one little layer
Speaker 1: at a time, this small little group of us with
Speaker 1: incredible support staff, like on my radio and TV shows,
Speaker 1: everyone busting their ass. The media never touched it. They
Speaker 1: just went with the phony narrative. They went with the
Speaker 1: phony Russia story that's now been debunked. They went with
Speaker 1: the phony quid pro quote story. They've ignored everything about
Speaker 1: what they care about Russian in affair. We don't care
Speaker 1: about a Russian oligarch, former first Lady of Moscow and
Speaker 1: wire transfers to zero experience Hunter Hunter on Good Morning America.
Speaker 1: Any experience in oil, new gas, new energy, new Ukraine. Now,
Speaker 1: why do you think you're being paid millions? I done?
Speaker 1: Maybe because your father was the vice president. Probably that's it. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's probable. They're not getting a billion dollars. I don't
Speaker 1: know what else to tell you. I just didn't think
Speaker 1: it could happen. You know, we used to send an
Speaker 1: election observers, who's gonna fix our broken election system? Things
Speaker 1: that we now know we didn't have partisan observers. Take
Speaker 1: that one issue that's proven partisan observers couldn't observe. I
Speaker 1: think we got to fix it. Are to fix their
Speaker 1: election problems. Go to their credit. Governor DeSantis did that
Speaker 1: we can fix things where the United States of America
Speaker 1: if we want to. You know, I guess there are
Speaker 1: people that want to keep going. Let's let's let's not
Speaker 1: look at what we now are finding out and discovering
Speaker 1: about the lead up to what can never happen again.
Speaker 1: And by the way, if you're ever you know, peacefully
Speaker 1: protesting part of it, and they start going awry, get out,
Speaker 1: don't be a part of this. You know, we believe
Speaker 1: in law. I love the ninety nine percent of FBI
Speaker 1: guys and the ninety nine percent of law enforcement. I
Speaker 1: agreed with those that were outraged, and we're peacefully protesting
Speaker 1: about George Floyd, not the rioters and the arsonist and
Speaker 1: the looters and those taking over and burning down police
Speaker 1: stations or the people that raided the capitol. We love
Speaker 1: law and we support law enforcement. The ninety nine percent
Speaker 1: Americans are good and honorable and decent people. We gotta
Speaker 1: now and make sure something like this can never happen again.
Speaker 1: You're not gonna if it becomes political, You're never gonna
Speaker 1: get to the truth. That's the problem. Right An hour
Speaker 1: two Sean Hannity Show eight hundred and nine for one,
Speaker 1: Shawn is our number? You want to be a part
Speaker 1: of the extravaganza. Well, our friends at Project Veritas they
Speaker 1: have now struck again, and this time they've got at
Speaker 1: Jack Twitter's CEO, Jack Dorsey. Linda used to be friends
Speaker 1: with this guy. He's a side note here. I don't
Speaker 1: know or and he even came on our show once
Speaker 1: and we ought to pull that interview out because I
Speaker 1: think some of the things he might have told us
Speaker 1: back then and not exactly part of the policies that
Speaker 1: now exist, and he's just on tape and an admitting, Well,
Speaker 1: we're focused on one account at Real Donald Trump right now,
Speaker 1: but this is going to be much bigger than just
Speaker 1: one account. It's gonna be it's gonna go out for
Speaker 1: much longer than just this day, this week, the next
Speaker 1: few weeks, and go way beyond the inauguration. So the
Speaker 1: focus is certainly on this account, Real Donald Trump, and
Speaker 1: how it ties into the real world, but it's also
Speaker 1: we need to think about much longer term around how
Speaker 1: these dynamics will play out over time. And it goes
Speaker 1: into great specificity in detail. Now if you remember when
Speaker 1: all of this happens it's sort of like the snap impeachment.
Speaker 1: What did the presidents sayings, many of you are going
Speaker 1: to peacefully and patriotically march to the capital and make
Speaker 1: your voices heard. Now we're learning all this new stuff
Speaker 1: about oh a lot of this turns out to be
Speaker 1: pre planned. Now this is a function of what Joe
Speaker 1: Biden wants to say to his own radical Democratic party
Speaker 1: that's planning on a post presidency impeachment. But more importantly
Speaker 1: about Mitch McConnell and Republicans in the United States Senate.
Speaker 1: Don't you think we need something the equivalent of a
Speaker 1: nine to eleven commission report delving deep into this and
Speaker 1: getting what happened? Who planned this level of planning? Now
Speaker 1: that we know that there's been some coordination, Now that
Speaker 1: we know multiple attempts at getting the National Guard in
Speaker 1: place were ignored, I mean, you know, and the other
Speaker 1: thing about you know, if you go to what Twitter
Speaker 1: claimed the specific tweets were at the time, well, they
Speaker 1: cited too when they banned the president for life. They
Speaker 1: cited the seventy five million great American patriots who voted
Speaker 1: for me America First and make America great again. Will
Speaker 1: have a giant voice long into the future. They will
Speaker 1: not be disrespected or treated unfairly in any way, shape
Speaker 1: or form. The other tweet said to all of those
Speaker 1: who have asked, I will not be going to the
Speaker 1: inauguration on January the twentieth, and Twitter claimed those two
Speaker 1: tweets glorified violence and therefore broke its policies. Then the
Speaker 1: permanent life ban, and remember they enjoyed that section to
Speaker 1: thirty status, the liability shield, legal liability shield that they have.
Speaker 1: And then on top of that, Okay, people say I'll
Speaker 1: go to another platform, will go to something like Parlor
Speaker 1: Dan Bongino's a great group of people, and they are great.
Speaker 1: Now I don't And by the way, you can criticize
Speaker 1: anybody on Parlor, even the owners of parlor Um. And
Speaker 1: just like Twitter beats the crap out of me, I
Speaker 1: would never think of silencing them. But anyway, then you
Speaker 1: get all the other giants to join on board. In
Speaker 1: other words, now incomes Apple, and incomes Amazon, and incomes
Speaker 1: other big tech the same ones that that wouldn't even
Speaker 1: allow The New York Post to publish an article on
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden's laptop, suppressing news and information valuable to we
Speaker 1: The American people before an election. Well now they're now
Speaker 1: they're helping to put parlor out of business. They're attempting to.
Speaker 1: I don't think they're going to be successful in the end,
Speaker 1: but they're attempting to. Anyway, let's play this project Veritas
Speaker 1: undercover video. We do intend to do retro. As I said,
Speaker 1: I know it's going to take some time, and then
Speaker 1: the other thing just to just to close out we
Speaker 1: we are focused on one account right now, but this
Speaker 1: is going to be much bigger than just one account,
Speaker 1: and it's going to go on for much longer than
Speaker 1: just this day, this week, the next few weeks, to
Speaker 1: kind of go on beyond inauguration. We have to expect that.
Speaker 1: We have to be ready for that. So the focus
Speaker 1: is certainly on this account and how it ties the
Speaker 1: real world violence, but also we need to think much
Speaker 1: longer term around how do these dynamics play out over time.
Speaker 1: I don't believe this is going away anytime soon. And
Speaker 1: the moves that we're making today around you and on
Speaker 1: for instance, to one such a camp all of a
Speaker 1: much broader approach that we should be looking at and
Speaker 1: going deep brought. So the team has a lot of
Speaker 1: work and a lot of focus on this particular issue.
Speaker 1: We also need to give them the space and the
Speaker 1: support to focus on the much bigger picture because it
Speaker 1: is it is not going to lay there. The US
Speaker 1: is extremely divided. Our platform is showing them every single night,
Speaker 1: and our roles team company that conversation and do what
Speaker 1: we can to make sure that no one has been armed. Okay,
Speaker 1: not as the focus. Um all right, joining us now
Speaker 1: as the founder and CEO of Project Veritas. Um. Uh,
Speaker 1: James o'keefer's back. Well this James, another great job. Um.
Speaker 1: Twitter is now claiming we got a statement for them
Speaker 1: for Hannity last night. As you know, you were on
Speaker 1: the show with us and basically said, no, no, no,
Speaker 1: this is this is almost the exact same thing that
Speaker 1: we we that Jack said before. Um, not exactly true.
Speaker 1: Your let's get your take on number one, how this
Speaker 1: all happened and what they said. Thanks Sean, thanks for
Speaker 1: having having Project artas on last night. Sean, this was
Speaker 1: a whistle blower inside of Twitter. As I said to
Speaker 1: you last night, they're having a crisis of conscience. These
Speaker 1: tech employees. They are frustrated and an upset by what's
Speaker 1: happening and they're coming to us in droves to our
Speaker 1: encrypted email address that's Veritas tips at ProtonMail dot com.
Speaker 1: We've had numerous tech insiders come to us. This one
Speaker 1: was a Twitter employee who recorded the CEO Jack Dorsey
Speaker 1: during some type of staff meeting. A video recorded Dorsey,
Speaker 1: who's remote, and Dorsey explicitly says, but he's conting to
Speaker 1: be much bigger than Trump. It's the spokesman is wrong.
Speaker 1: It's not the same statement Dorsey has made on Twitter.
Speaker 1: You can see Dorsey's saying it. He's saying they're going
Speaker 1: to go retroactively, go through here and ban folks that
Speaker 1: are more the moderate, sort of right leaning people. It's
Speaker 1: not just the qan on, it's not just what they
Speaker 1: would determine our extremes. And all of you listening have
Speaker 1: seen your Twitter followers go down by maybe ten percent,
Speaker 1: fifteen percent of your following. I at one point one
Speaker 1: million followers went down to nine hundred thousand, So I
Speaker 1: think you're to see more of this censorship. It's gonna
Speaker 1: be much bigger. And I think, Sean, the fact that
Speaker 1: Twitter did respond means that we are inside their heads
Speaker 1: and they're very concerned about more of these tapes being published.
Speaker 1: Are there more tapes because I kind of know I've
Speaker 1: kind of known you now for years, James O'Keefe, that's
Speaker 1: kind of your m O. I've got you figured out
Speaker 1: a little bit, not completely, but a little bit. You
Speaker 1: probably have me figured out more than other people. Sean. Yes,
Speaker 1: that's our modus op BRANDI is to release it a
Speaker 1: bit at a time. We do have more tapes. We
Speaker 1: have you know, Vice President's upper echelon on tape being
Speaker 1: more specific as to how they're going to do these bands.
Speaker 1: And you know, people say, well, this is a private company,
Speaker 1: they can do what they want. Well, that's true, they
Speaker 1: are a private company. But I've made the argument that
Speaker 1: they're more powerful than the government. They're more powerful than
Speaker 1: all three branches of the government, because that's how the
Speaker 1: government gets its messaging out is through these platforms. But
Speaker 1: there's a bigger problem because now they're allies in the
Speaker 1: tech world that you're right, extraordinarily powerful. And I think
Speaker 1: Devin Nunas is right and talking about any trust issues
Speaker 1: that will eventually emerge. But probably the Democrats don't want
Speaker 1: them to change at all because it's working in their
Speaker 1: propaganda favor. Um and just typical. But they all came
Speaker 1: now not only to support Twitter, they all crushed the
Speaker 1: competition that was rising against them, which was the number
Speaker 1: one app in the days prior to Apple and Amazon
Speaker 1: all these other big tech companies forcing Parlor offline. Yeah,
Speaker 1: you know, and now they're talking about banning Telegram, which
Speaker 1: is another app that that is very helpful for communicating. Uh.
Speaker 1: But you know, listen, I think I think that Dorsey,
Speaker 1: he says it in his own words, quote the US
Speaker 1: is recorded by our whistleblower. The US has extremely divided
Speaker 1: our platform and showing that we need a longer term
Speaker 1: about how these dynamics play. This is not going me
Speaker 1: anytime soon, this day, this week, the next few weeks.
Speaker 1: It's going to go well, will beyond the inauguration unquote.
Speaker 1: So what the CEO is saying, video recorded by this
Speaker 1: whistleblower sent to US, is that it's not just about Trump,
Speaker 1: and it's not just about what they would proceed to
Speaker 1: be radical or extreme far right. This is about any
Speaker 1: type of speech that that is different than the orthodoxy.
Speaker 1: They're trying to shrink or minimize the Overton window, the
Speaker 1: range of acceptable things in our discourse and they're basically
Speaker 1: saying it, and you know, on this call, and they're
Speaker 1: a shame that Sean that we have caught them saying it.
Speaker 1: They're they're they're upset about it. That's why the vice
Speaker 1: president of Twitter is responding. So we I think what's
Speaker 1: going to happen is there's going to be a mass
Speaker 1: exodus of tech engineers frustrated with what's going on, following
Speaker 1: their conscience, giving up their livelihood. I think that's the
Speaker 1: only thing that will change these things. We have to
Speaker 1: shock the people and hold them hold their feet to
Speaker 1: the fire by exposing what they're saying and doing inside
Speaker 1: Twitter and Facebook and Google. Now, the last time we
Speaker 1: checked the Ayatola, one of the mullahs in Iran was
Speaker 1: out there. If their Twitter accounts up and have communized
Speaker 1: Chinese with propaganda tweets up there, I mean they still up,
Speaker 1: you know, tweeting threats at Israel. Because I didn't notice that.
Speaker 1: And by the way, I could go through Twitter on
Speaker 1: any given day and see the most terrific things said
Speaker 1: about me here. I've never once thought in my life
Speaker 1: that I'd want Twitter to take them down. Our silence
Speaker 1: any democrat that hates my guts and even makes false,
Speaker 1: libelous slander against me. I just it's never crossed my mind, James.
Speaker 1: I just I'm like, actually, some of the attacks are funny.
Speaker 1: You know. It's you've been way ahead of the curve.
Speaker 1: And I've always said and I haven't said it a
Speaker 1: lot recently, but I used to say it a lot.
Speaker 1: You know, we've just got to become the media we
Speaker 1: you know, Parlor now needs to build their own infrastructure
Speaker 1: so they don't need Apple or Amazon or anybody else.
Speaker 1: And the same holds true for you and getting your
Speaker 1: information out. It's I mean, these are these are uncharted waters.
Speaker 1: But I've got to believe that some of these big
Speaker 1: tech people, like some of the people that go to
Speaker 1: your whatever proton mail thing, the tipline you have that
Speaker 1: sends you this information. I've got to believe that they
Speaker 1: are smart tech people that will help navigate the reliance
Speaker 1: on these big tech companies and take it away. We
Speaker 1: can create our own infrastructures and bypass the whole thing.
Speaker 1: It's very hard to create that infrastructure. It's you know,
Speaker 1: billions of dollars and being a competitor. But I also
Speaker 1: think Sean, in addition to building the new infrastructure. We
Speaker 1: simply have to hold them their feet to the fire.
Speaker 1: The only thing that Dorsey fears is exposure. And they
Speaker 1: talk in code. I mean, the guy is kind of
Speaker 1: a strange man. He's meditating in some log cabin right
Speaker 1: now in the middle of nowhere. These are strange people
Speaker 1: with strange cultures. But if we can get them on
Speaker 1: tape admitting what they're doing and why they're doing it,
Speaker 1: that's the only saying that I think is going to
Speaker 1: really hold them accountable. I really believe exposure in and
Speaker 1: of itself is an end in and of itself, especially
Speaker 1: in these times. So Veritas tips at ProtonMail dot com.
Speaker 1: That's how the Insider came to us, and we're hopefully
Speaker 1: going to get these guys on the record very soon.
Speaker 1: They have skin in the game. They're giving up their livelihood.
Speaker 1: This is what we need to do in this country.
Speaker 1: We need an army of citizen exposures to awaken the people.
Speaker 1: Courage can be contagious, Sean. If we just build that
Speaker 1: and we're doing it, and we'll have the next tape
Speaker 1: up on Monday, And I know that you've you've already
Speaker 1: said that you you would like to talk to us
Speaker 1: about that. We thank you for that getting this message
Speaker 1: out there. Not much heat I take, just for letting
Speaker 1: you talk. I mean, it's unbelievable, you know, it really
Speaker 1: is to me. And Okay, you have the tapes, you
Speaker 1: put the raw footage usually up on your website if
Speaker 1: people want to look at it, and you let you
Speaker 1: bring people into the process. Every time you've been sued,
Speaker 1: you one. I mean, it's just unbelieve evable. I mean
Speaker 1: it's like, I'm a conservative, We've always been gotten this
Speaker 1: bad rap. We're not for free speech. I'm just the
Speaker 1: opposite my whole career. I'm like, if you don't like
Speaker 1: Howard Stern, don't tune in a Howard Stern, you don't
Speaker 1: like don I Miss, don't tune in a Him. You
Speaker 1: don't like talk radio, don't listen. If you don't like
Speaker 1: Hannity on Fox, don't watch. By the way, I can
Speaker 1: only control my hour for people that ask me all
Speaker 1: the time. I can't. That's that's I got one hour.
Speaker 1: I'm not the programmer, um anyway, and I use I
Speaker 1: do my shows independently as I always have. And you know,
Speaker 1: we've been under fire, James, so they've been trying to
Speaker 1: cancel me for years, long before the cancel culture was
Speaker 1: ever even a phrase. Well, they've failed. And sometimes it's
Speaker 1: not because the information we present is false, but because
Speaker 1: it is true. And the more true it gets, the
Speaker 1: worse it gets for these four powers that be. It's
Speaker 1: because we are telling the truth. There's nothing fombastic or
Speaker 1: controversial about what it is that I say, or you say,
Speaker 1: or we show. It's literally a tape of the CEO
Speaker 1: of Putter talking Newsworthy. But because they're powerful, nobody has
Speaker 1: the cajones to do it. So someone's got to do it.
Speaker 1: And I everyone asks what can I do? What can
Speaker 1: I do? They don't know what to do, and this
Speaker 1: is a way for them to get involved. These these
Speaker 1: tech people, I'm telling you a lot of them are
Speaker 1: coming forward. We have this vice president of Twitter on
Speaker 1: camera and we're going to be releasing it Monday. We
Speaker 1: have to produce it and do some things and ask
Speaker 1: for comment, but we're going to be releasing that and
Speaker 1: I think that it'll create an army of exposure. Sean,
Speaker 1: all right, James O'Keefe, Project Veritas found our CEO. Thanks
Speaker 1: again for sharing the information, and I urge people to
Speaker 1: go watch it themselves on their website. We'll link it
Speaker 1: to Hannity dot com. You decide, and you make up
Speaker 1: your own mind. But I think it's very revealing, and
Speaker 1: I think this effort of cancel culture wokeness, it just
Speaker 1: is stifling out there. You know, it's it's getting bad.
Speaker 1: And and as I always predicted it will always they're
Speaker 1: gonna want to silence conservatives more than anybody. I've always
Speaker 1: said that, and it's real, all right, twenty five till
Speaker 1: the top of the hour, eight hundred and ninety four
Speaker 1: one seawn if you want to be a part of
Speaker 1: this extravaganza. So this is very very big news, and
Speaker 1: it's something if I could only have a dollar for
Speaker 1: every time I would say, why don't we declassify and
Speaker 1: have an Office of Government Transparency and release to the
Speaker 1: public all of these documents as it relates to Spygate?
Speaker 1: And they've been unwilling to do so why I can't
Speaker 1: really give you an answer. I don't know. People never
Speaker 1: listen to me. A lot of people never listen to me,
Speaker 1: and it gets a little frustrating on a lot of
Speaker 1: different levels. Anyway, Remember this, this was Spygate, the Obama
Speaker 1: administration's corrupt scheme to use the FISA courts and Hillary
Speaker 1: Clinton's dirty Russian misinformation dossier to acquire never verified to
Speaker 1: lie to a FISA court repeatedly to spy on the
Speaker 1: Trump campaign, Trump transition team, and Donald Trump the president.
Speaker 1: I mean, that's how bad it is. Now, Finally, in
Speaker 1: the final hours of the Trump presidency, we are now told,
Speaker 1: and we've confirmed, that hundreds of documents have in fact
Speaker 1: now been made available or being made available that pertained
Speaker 1: to the greatest abuse of power corruption scandal in American history.
Speaker 1: We're talking about depositions and transcripts and interviews and other evidence,
Speaker 1: key materials related to the Obama administration's effort to spy
Speaker 1: on President Trump and then Candidate Trump, the Trump Whitehouse,
Speaker 1: the Trump presidency, the whole bit. As a matter of fact,
Speaker 1: I actually had the President, this goes back to twenty
Speaker 1: nineteen on this program, and he said he gave Bill
Speaker 1: Barr at the time the age, the authority to do
Speaker 1: whatever he wanted with the classified documents. Now I believe
Speaker 1: that that Durham, the special counsel now the has all
Speaker 1: of this, And then it just makes me even angrier.
Speaker 1: Why is it taking four years at plus to find
Speaker 1: out what happened in the previous election. We should have
Speaker 1: known before we voted in this election. Anyway, here's the president.
Speaker 1: Mister President, you have the power to literally released defies,
Speaker 1: the applications and the three OZ twos in the Gang
Speaker 1: of Eight information. And you made a decision to hand
Speaker 1: it over to the Attorney General and let him decide.
Speaker 1: And I'm curious as to why. Well, we have a
Speaker 1: very respected gentleman, a very high quality person named William
Speaker 1: Barr and he's doing he's I can tell you he's
Speaker 1: working so hard. And rather than just doing a total release,
Speaker 1: I gave I gave him a total release. In another words,
Speaker 1: he's got anything he needs. He's got. He's the Attorney
Speaker 1: General of the United States. He's got a lot of
Speaker 1: very good people under him that I guess are involved,
Speaker 1: and I gave them a total release. So all of
Speaker 1: it's been released and he has all of it. I've
Speaker 1: also given him authorization to release it to whoever he wants. Now,
Speaker 1: we were told that these documents were released at two
Speaker 1: thirty today, not at least some of them. But then
Speaker 1: I'm hearing from other people that maybe there's still some holdbacks. Anyway, Well,
Speaker 1: he's been fighting harder even than I have been in
Speaker 1: getting these documents now for years. It's John Solomon. He's
Speaker 1: the editor in chief of just thenews dot com and
Speaker 1: author of the book Fallout. And you know, we've been wanting, waiting,
Speaker 1: even knowing what's in some of these documents, unable to
Speaker 1: talk about them until they come out. John. But there's
Speaker 1: things that you and I both know exist that would
Speaker 1: really blow this wide open, but we can't get access
Speaker 1: to it. Why Yep, it's the extraordinary power of the
Speaker 1: bureaucracy in each of these agencies. Every agency claims to
Speaker 1: have the antiquities, the rights to make their decision to
Speaker 1: review these to make sure there aren't any national security
Speaker 1: secrets that would harm a life or harm our national security.
Speaker 1: And of course, at the last minute, as the President
Speaker 1: has already authorized the release of these documents, all the bureaucracies,
Speaker 1: worried about what we're going to learn about their agencies,
Speaker 1: has taken one last run at trying to redact, slow down,
Speaker 1: stop review the information in there. There's nothing at Well,
Speaker 1: if the President of the United States says to release it,
Speaker 1: they don't. They have to release it. You would sure
Speaker 1: think that that would be the case, but we've seen
Speaker 1: time and again that these agencies have an ecosystem of
Speaker 1: their own. They can sport slow obfuscape for as long
Speaker 1: as you want. I have a high degree of confidence
Speaker 1: that they were just a few hours or maybe forty
Speaker 1: eight hours or less away from this. I think, I
Speaker 1: said on your show last night're doing somewhere between Friday
Speaker 1: and Monday, these documents would become available. Still feel confident
Speaker 1: it will happen, But I have a good sense already
Speaker 1: what's in there, and there are some big stories that
Speaker 1: we can prepare us helps for. We can look at
Speaker 1: the documents, but the big, the big new reveals are
Speaker 1: pretty clear to me from the reporting I've done. All Right,
Speaker 1: let's go through it, because we're talking about a stack
Speaker 1: I'm told at least a foot high released by the
Speaker 1: Justice Department, ordered released by the Justice Department. They've had
Speaker 1: a lot of this for years. I mean it's when
Speaker 1: Rick Ronell was acting Director of National Intelligence. Rick Rnell
Speaker 1: released a lot, then Ratcliffe after him. But these are
Speaker 1: documents that would corroborate a lot of your reporting and
Speaker 1: a lot of what we said on the show. Yeah,
Speaker 1: and they have things that I'm totally shocked by as
Speaker 1: I've done reporting. Let's take for one, it's just a
Speaker 1: real shocker to me, and I'm one hundred percent certain
Speaker 1: it's true. It's going to be in these documents. The
Speaker 1: Christopher Steel when he meets with the FBI year after
Speaker 1: he's been fired. Remember he's fired November sixteen for leaking
Speaker 1: to the media. A year later, he comes back, the
Speaker 1: FBI is now dubious of his entire dosscape, and he says,
Speaker 1: guess where I got my primary subsource from? Him? They say,
Speaker 1: when he said from Fiona Hill. If you don't remember
Speaker 1: who Fiona Hill is, she was one of the star
Speaker 1: impeachment witnesses against Donald Trump in late twenty nineteen. She
Speaker 1: was a National Security Council expert on Russia, very well
Speaker 1: respected as a Russia expert. But it turns out she
Speaker 1: is the person, according to Steele, that introduced him to
Speaker 1: the subsource who gave him all that malarchy, all that
Speaker 1: bad dope that was in his dossier that turned out
Speaker 1: to be Russian disinformation or just completely uncorroborated garbage. So
Speaker 1: i'll respected NFC staffer who becomes a witness against the
Speaker 1: president is involved in the earlier Russia collusion narrative building
Speaker 1: remarkable revelation and I even I have falter all the
Speaker 1: reporting I've done. That one caught me completely off guard.
Speaker 1: I think the big story, the story that everyone will
Speaker 1: remember from these documents, and it is the final story
Speaker 1: of Russia collusion. Why did it happen Because Hilary Clinton
Speaker 1: and their team, including Christopher Steele, wanted to change change
Speaker 1: the topic away from problems with their email server to
Speaker 1: a false story that would vilify Donald Trump on Russia.
Speaker 1: That is the headline that will come from Christopher steel
Speaker 1: debrief with the FBI. I remember who's fired for leaking,
Speaker 1: told the FBI why he was leaking, and this will
Speaker 1: be corroborated, we expect by these documents, because he wanted
Speaker 1: to help Hillary cover up her email problem. But remember
Speaker 1: when they went to the subsource in January of twenty seventeen,
Speaker 1: the subsce said, none of this is true, this is
Speaker 1: bar talks, was never meant for this what they've used
Speaker 1: it for. It's all none of it's corroborated or And
Speaker 1: at that point they still were signing FISA warrants and
Speaker 1: didn't come and McCabe and all these people have to
Speaker 1: know at that point, those people putting their signatures on
Speaker 1: these go back earlier. So I of twenty sixteen, the
Speaker 1: CIA director walks into the President of the United States,
Speaker 1: President Barack Obama. Who would have thunk it? That's Brennan, Yeah,
Speaker 1: John Brennan. The CI director goes in and says, have
Speaker 1: intelligence indicating Hillary Clinton has concocted this Russia story to
Speaker 1: possibly deflect from concerns in her email. That's an intelligence
Speaker 1: intercept that we don't know exact nature of it, but
Speaker 1: it's pretty clear what the president was told. It's then
Speaker 1: sent to the FBI, which means Pete Struck and his
Speaker 1: team gets it. They knew it even before Christopher Steele
Speaker 1: confirms it a year later. And still they proceeded with
Speaker 1: one of the most bizarre investigations in American history, a
Speaker 1: counterintelligence threat that never existed. Remember the FBI agent who
Speaker 1: came out in September of this past year and said
Speaker 1: there never was any evidence of collusion. It was all
Speaker 1: about quote get Trump, an amazing, amazing story that our
Speaker 1: intelligence and law enforcement agencies were used for a long
Speaker 1: term political dirty trick against Donald Trump. I mean It's
Speaker 1: almost something that you wouldn't believe in a spy novel, John.
Speaker 1: I mean when you think about it, you know and
Speaker 1: look at for example, we expect about Stefan Helper, you know,
Speaker 1: the guy that recorded poor papadoppelas poor Carter Page in
Speaker 1: all of this, in his tasking orders, and that he
Speaker 1: was told by the FBI to spy on the Trump campaign,
Speaker 1: and in fact he was given a cover try and
Speaker 1: pretend you want to get hired by the Trump campaign.
Speaker 1: Isn't that the opposite of what we were told under
Speaker 1: sworn testimony before Congress? The very thing, by the way
Speaker 1: they went after Roger Stone for with twenty nine tactical
Speaker 1: guys and frogmen and pre dawn raids and CNN cameras.
Speaker 1: You know, wasn't it about lying to Congress? Is this
Speaker 1: not proof positive that people lied to Congress? We'll think
Speaker 1: about even as recently as December twenty nineteen, we had
Speaker 1: James Comey on Fox News with Chris Wallace, and he
Speaker 1: tried to tell Chris Wallace it never was spying. Spyings
Speaker 1: are wrong where there was no spying. When people see
Speaker 1: the tasking document that is going to be made available,
Speaker 1: where they sit down with Steffan Halper in August at
Speaker 1: twenty sixteen and say here's what you're going to do.
Speaker 1: And they're Trump campaign, Trump campaign, Trump campaign, over and
Speaker 1: over again. It shows up in the document, and most importantly,
Speaker 1: they're telling him use the false premise that you're trying
Speaker 1: to get a job there. Don't take the job, but
Speaker 1: use it to get people to talk to you and
Speaker 1: find out for this from this person, record that person.
Speaker 1: Do this. That's called spying. When you use a false
Speaker 1: premise to get information from other people. It's the definition
Speaker 1: of spying. Nothing wrong by Stephan Alper. That's what spies
Speaker 1: are paid to do. But the idea that James Coomy
Speaker 1: and the Democrats in Congress cannot still acknowledge the word
Speaker 1: spying tells you just how deeply flawed this fantasy is.
Speaker 1: That was called John. We live in a world where
Speaker 1: they don't care. We had a snap impeachment this past week.
Speaker 1: They don't care. They don't care about emerging details that
Speaker 1: it looks like and there's evidence emerging all over the
Speaker 1: place that this was all preplanned. Well, that would negate
Speaker 1: and the president's own words that you will march peacefully
Speaker 1: and patriotically to the Capitol to let your voices be heard.
Speaker 1: And by the way, that does not diminish culpability of
Speaker 1: some people, the small personne of people that joined in
Speaker 1: the storming of the capital. They've got to be held
Speaker 1: accountable too. But you know, who are the people that organized,
Speaker 1: prepared and planned it. Apparently that all happen. That's the
Speaker 1: most important thing. I think you and I've talked about this, Sean.
Speaker 1: I think the Capital siege story will go the route
Speaker 1: of Russia collusion. It's going to start in one point,
Speaker 1: and then when we get all the facts, we peel
Speaker 1: that onion bag, as you like to say, it's going
Speaker 1: to be a very different story. It's already a very
Speaker 1: different story one weekend. And that's what makes the tragedy
Speaker 1: of the impeachment. Doing impeachment without witnesses, without facts, a
Speaker 1: drive by impeachment, as I've called it, is not what
Speaker 1: the founding fathers intended. And we're going to find out
Speaker 1: that the facts were not in evidence to give members
Speaker 1: an honest chance to make a decision of whether they
Speaker 1: should impeach the president. That's a real shame for our constitution,
Speaker 1: all right. So we expect and do you see any
Speaker 1: efforts now emerging to defy the president's release demand? Oh? Yes, absolutely,
Speaker 1: to the last minute when they're in the public sands,
Speaker 1: there will be that effort because these agencies have so
Speaker 1: much institutional embarrassment to endure if these documents were put out,
Speaker 1: there's not any not that I Why don't they want
Speaker 1: to restore faith and confidence in institutions? You know, there
Speaker 1: are good people who gets you know. It's it's sort
Speaker 1: of like if one percent of cops go bad, you know,
Speaker 1: other cops get blamed. It's not fair. It's not just
Speaker 1: same with the FBI guys, same with the intelligence community.
Speaker 1: You know, isn't the best thing they could do is
Speaker 1: clean house and make sure it never happens again. It's
Speaker 1: not that hard. When I first came to Washington, I
Speaker 1: met this wily senator who've retired just before I got here,
Speaker 1: and because I was from Wisconsin, I went to see him.
Speaker 1: His name as Bill Proxmire, liberal senator from Wisconsin, well liked,
Speaker 1: and he said to me, you're going to attribute a
Speaker 1: lot of things as a reporter to big scandals and
Speaker 1: gigantic ideas, and you're going to think there's conspiracies going on.
Speaker 1: Most times, the self preservation of the bureaucrat is the
Speaker 1: primary reason why nothing gets done in Washington. And thirty
Speaker 1: years later, I hear his words still to me and
Speaker 1: my aad and I think, what a wise man He understood.
Speaker 1: Bureaucracy lived to self preserve themselves and they'll do anything
Speaker 1: to keep from being embarrassed. And you know, that's the
Speaker 1: copic fight. But I think Donald Trump wins if he's
Speaker 1: going to deliver on his promise. Mark Meadows and the
Speaker 1: team that are working on this, they're going to get
Speaker 1: it out there and the American people are going to
Speaker 1: have a pretty remarkable accounting of just how badly the FBI,
Speaker 1: the Justice Department let this country down. Quick Break more
Speaker 1: with Just the News dot COM's John Solomon on the
Speaker 1: other side, and Jason Chaffetz. He has more on this
Speaker 1: story as well. Right as we continue, John Solomon, he
Speaker 1: is the editor and chief of Just the News dot com.
Speaker 1: You at just the News dot Com have also been
Speaker 1: following parallel stories about this emerging planning of what happened
Speaker 1: at the Capitol. As you know, people you know, swarmed
Speaker 1: in there illegally and everything we watched in horror unfold,
Speaker 1: which should never happen. We need I think we need
Speaker 1: a the equivalent of a nine eleve on Commission report
Speaker 1: on it. But you're seeing, what do we know about
Speaker 1: those that might have planned all of this? Well, there's
Speaker 1: a good news today. There is a speaker Pelosi today
Speaker 1: named a very respected general General Honore to begin an
Speaker 1: independent investigation, and there is talk of a larger commission
Speaker 1: to follow that. And I think your idea, Sean's going
Speaker 1: to catch fire. But while that's going on, that's going
Speaker 1: to take weeks. There is pretty clear evidence from the
Speaker 1: Washington Field office of the FBID. It's been very good
Speaker 1: about giving reporters updates, and it is pretty clear they
Speaker 1: have a growing belief that this was planned in advance,
Speaker 1: four five, twenty days in advance, that people were talking
Speaker 1: about killing officers on chat boards a couple of days before,
Speaker 1: and it prompted a flurry of security concerns that unfortunately
Speaker 1: didn't come to the right resolution. There was a lot
Speaker 1: of recommendations from the president's own Defense department, from Secretary
Speaker 1: Miller that we should bring ten thousand National Guard over.
Speaker 1: The President was encouraging it privately behind the scenes, and
Speaker 1: for some reason, that we don't know the answer. The
Speaker 1: house sergeant at arms said no, bad optics, don't want
Speaker 1: to do it, even though the police chief wanted believable capital.
Speaker 1: The guy, the guy we need, was the right. We
Speaker 1: need to know, we do right. Why Why did they
Speaker 1: say no? Why the mayor say no? This guy was
Speaker 1: begging for the Nashville Guard before any of this, and
Speaker 1: and all the evidence that there were a lot of
Speaker 1: warnings that this was going to happen, that there were
Speaker 1: people organizing, and it doesn't it's not exculpatory to those
Speaker 1: that you know in the moment involved in themselves in
Speaker 1: raiding the capital. But you can't do it all right,
Speaker 1: Thanks John Solomon, Just the News dot Com. Coming up next,
Speaker 1: our final news round Up and Information Overload hour, My
Speaker 1: News round Up, Information Overload Hours, Sean Hannity Show, we'll
Speaker 1: get to your calls, and our friend Ammy Horowitz documentary
Speaker 1: in Extraordinary, will join us at the bottom of the hour,
Speaker 1: and then we'll get to your calls. Remember Ram Rambo, Deadfish,
Speaker 1: Emmanuel member, never let a crisis go to waste. You
Speaker 1: never want a serious crisis to go to waste. And
Speaker 1: what I mean by that, it's an opportunity to do
Speaker 1: things that you think you could not do before. Well,
Speaker 1: our good friend and colleague at the Fox News Channel,
Speaker 1: former Congressman Jason Chaffits actually as a brand new book out.
Speaker 1: It's called They Never Let a Crisis Go to Waste
Speaker 1: The Truth about Disaster Liberalism, and he discusses a lot
Speaker 1: of everything that we've talked about and joins us. Now,
Speaker 1: by the way, I was honored that you gave me
Speaker 1: an early copy of the book and I got to
Speaker 1: breeze through it and give you a blurb for the book,
Speaker 1: and I guess it comes out in April, which we're
Speaker 1: excited about. Well, thanks, Sean, No, I do appreciate it.
Speaker 1: I think if people get this book, it will not
Speaker 1: only be illuminating to how democrats and liberal do this,
Speaker 1: but how they abuse the system. And it's not just
Speaker 1: big items, it's not just COVID, it's not just you know,
Speaker 1: other things like that. They use just about everything that
Speaker 1: they can, whether it's fiction or truth, and it's often
Speaker 1: not a solution to the crisis at hand, but they
Speaker 1: use it to leverage and do other things that they
Speaker 1: would never ever be able to do any other way
Speaker 1: because they would never get through the normal course of business.
Speaker 1: And the book is just chock full of these examples
Speaker 1: time and time again how democrats abuse the system. It's
Speaker 1: the truth of how disaster liberalism works. You know, it's
Speaker 1: so scary. And you know, now, the president, you've been
Speaker 1: involved deeply in this whole Russia Gate affair, and you
Speaker 1: actually know the Inspector General Michael HARROWOODZ Michael Harrowood's made
Speaker 1: referrals in his report was you know, I cannot believe
Speaker 1: we've not resolved these issues at this late date. Now
Speaker 1: the President has given an open release to all the
Speaker 1: documents involved in this, and my sources tell me that
Speaker 1: there is mysterious reluctance and resistance to follow the president's
Speaker 1: edict is his legal order that he's put out there. Now.
Speaker 1: For the life of me, I can't understand why it's
Speaker 1: been so hard. You can eat easily remove sources and
Speaker 1: methods from any document. Doesn't take that long, Jason, and
Speaker 1: let the public see for their own eyes. We've gone
Speaker 1: over in great detail what John Solomon has but you know,
Speaker 1: here we are over four years later and we never
Speaker 1: get to the bottom of it. But the only people
Speaker 1: that did get in trouble. You know, we did have
Speaker 1: in spite of Horowitz's referrals of deep state operatives, nothing
Speaker 1: happens to them. But you know Roger Stone, who quote
Speaker 1: lied to Congress, got twenty nine guys in tactical gear
Speaker 1: and Frogman in a pre dawn rate of his house
Speaker 1: with CNN cameras rolling away. Yeah, not Roger Stone, others.
Speaker 1: What happened at General Flynn was an absolute travesty in
Speaker 1: this country for somebody who had served our nation so
Speaker 1: honorably for so long. I mean, that's just fundamentally wrong.
Speaker 1: And you're right, Inspector General Horowitz had put out more
Speaker 1: than a thousand pages, made more than a dozen referrals,
Speaker 1: and only one person had any kind of slap on
Speaker 1: the hand. It's one of the most discouraging things because
Speaker 1: I don't think the Department of Justice is administering justice.
Speaker 1: I think that Lady Justice with that blank bolt, you know,
Speaker 1: kind of peaks and make sure that, hey, if there's
Speaker 1: a Democrat or a Clinton or a Biden involved, you know,
Speaker 1: we're just going to be hands off and move along.
Speaker 1: It's just it's beyond frustrating because you and I've been
Speaker 1: talking about this for years everybody sees it, and then
Speaker 1: the President says, well, let's allow America to see it,
Speaker 1: and yet those documents continue to be thwarted by the
Speaker 1: deep state. It's just disgusting. Let's talk about you go
Speaker 1: in great detail about how coronavirus has been a disaster
Speaker 1: for the country. Well, that's obvious. I mean, we lost
Speaker 1: a lot of fellow Americans with this thing. It's I
Speaker 1: don't think we've ever been told the truth. I mean,
Speaker 1: the president building hospitals and building ppe. We never ran
Speaker 1: out of ventilators and masks and end gowns and gloves
Speaker 1: and shields and all of the things associated with it.
Speaker 1: They got it done. And now warp speed gets us
Speaker 1: a vaccine and millions of them now going into people's
Speaker 1: arms every day. And you know, it's like you listen
Speaker 1: to the mob, the media, the Democrats, you would think
Speaker 1: Donald Trump is responsible for the worst pandemic since nineteen
Speaker 1: seventeen and eighteen. That's not true. And a lot of scientists,
Speaker 1: I don't even critique them. I know they were doing
Speaker 1: their best. Nobody meant any harm. But there was so
Speaker 1: much confusion, false information given out, predictions that were wildly off,
Speaker 1: and you know, you make decisions based on what you
Speaker 1: think you know, not what you absolutely know. And even
Speaker 1: politicizing treatments and therapeutics for coronavirus. I mean, you know,
Speaker 1: don't listen to the doctors. If Donald Trump says a
Speaker 1: good word about it, yeah, I mean, Donald Trump will
Speaker 1: never get enough credit for what he did one of
Speaker 1: the best things about his presidency with Operation Warp Speed
Speaker 1: he Reckon nine back in late in January. The government
Speaker 1: wasn't going to come up with these solutions. The private
Speaker 1: entities were going to do it. But as I point
Speaker 1: out in that book, they never let a crisis go
Speaker 1: to waste. The truth about disaster liberalism, you had entities
Speaker 1: all across the country use that crisis to leverage and
Speaker 1: do things that they would have never done otherwise. For instance,
Speaker 1: the LA Teachers Union said, we're not going to go
Speaker 1: back to school and teach your kids and put them
Speaker 1: in classrooms and tell you past medicaid for all. What
Speaker 1: does that have to do with coronavirus. It doesn't. They
Speaker 1: try to take away our guns, They tried to suppress
Speaker 1: us on social media, and the list goes on and
Speaker 1: on and on, and when government figures out that is
Speaker 1: with a crisis, they can bypass the normal constitutional process.
Speaker 1: Guess what the number of crisis is. They become unlimited
Speaker 1: because they have to solve a solution. Some of its fiction,
Speaker 1: some of it's real, but it doesn't actually solve the crisis.
Speaker 1: It just moves the Democrats agenda fords. Look what they're
Speaker 1: trying to do on trying to change how we vote,
Speaker 1: and I think cost an election. I really do well.
Speaker 1: I mean you look at for example, the Democrats never
Speaker 1: cared the media, never really cared about Russian interference because
Speaker 1: they ignored the dirty dossier that they didn't care about
Speaker 1: premeditated fraud on a FISI coord I bet they wouldn't
Speaker 1: feel the same way if it all came out that
Speaker 1: Republicans did this or deep state operatives did this to
Speaker 1: Hillary or Joe. They cared about Ukraine and quid pro quos,
Speaker 1: but not Joe and zero experience Hunter. Hypocrisy is everywhere,
Speaker 1: And now we have a snap impeachment on top of
Speaker 1: the earlier ridiculous impeachment, and one has to wonder as
Speaker 1: now facts still emerging as to what actually happened, and
Speaker 1: those people that might have been involved in a preplanned
Speaker 1: attack against the Capitol, the organizers of this thing. It's
Speaker 1: a little scary that this is, you know, this is
Speaker 1: the United States of America, but it is. I'm not
Speaker 1: sure if the stated policies of Joe, along with big
Speaker 1: Heck in the media protecting him every day. I mean,
Speaker 1: there's no telling what comes next. Yeah, I think the
Speaker 1: media is going to take their go into hibernation, take
Speaker 1: their collective nap. For the next four years. Social media
Speaker 1: will continue to bear down on conservatives and not allow
Speaker 1: a dissenting voice. Hey, you know, it's kind of what
Speaker 1: I saw in two thousand and nine when Joe Biden
Speaker 1: and Barack Obama came into place. Where are the first
Speaker 1: things we dealt with? Fast and furious? Biden and Obama
Speaker 1: their administration put out two thousand weapons, gave them to
Speaker 1: the drug cartels to see what would happen. Was that
Speaker 1: on the cover of Time magazine? No? But did they
Speaker 1: put Donald Trump Junior on the cover of Time magazine
Speaker 1: for having a stupid twenty minute meeting that led to
Speaker 1: absolutely nothing? Yeah? They did, And it's just disgusting. All right,
Speaker 1: Jason Chavis, they never let a crisis go to waste.
Speaker 1: We're looking forward to seeing it in book form. Thank you, sir.
Speaker 1: Thanks John all right eight hundred and nine for one
Speaker 1: Sean you want to be a part of the program.
Speaker 1: As we check in, Donovan as in Florida, Donovan, how
Speaker 1: are you hi, mister Hannity, Thank you for talking with me.
Speaker 1: Thank you. I'm wanting to go that. Thank you. I
Speaker 1: wanted to go straight to my point. I work for
Speaker 1: a company that lowers the cost of inmate calls to
Speaker 1: their families. The inmate pays are the calls, and we
Speaker 1: make them affordable. And we just make them affordable and
Speaker 1: make them secure. So, since I'm the ad man for
Speaker 1: a Facebook and Instagram, what has happened is they started
Speaker 1: shadow blocking my ads. My ads are non political, They
Speaker 1: are not connected to me in any way, shape or form.
Speaker 1: They are ads that reaches this collective community. And because
Speaker 1: Facebook is a word of mouth or Instagram is word
Speaker 1: of mouth, it affects our company and it's affecting the families.
Speaker 1: What is their criticism? Why would why would they attack you?
Speaker 1: If you're you're actually helping facilitate calls between family members
Speaker 1: with people that are incarcerated, Why would they do that? Ah,
Speaker 1: I have a personal page. I have a personal page,
Speaker 1: and I'm sure it is my IP address. It's happened twice,
Speaker 1: it happened right before the election, and it's going on
Speaker 1: right now. So I only post political facts and don't
Speaker 1: get a lot from you. And I think you should
Speaker 1: bullet point them on your website every single day. You
Speaker 1: should tell us where to go for that source that
Speaker 1: we can bullet plug you. No, I listen, we're in
Speaker 1: the process of preparing all of that. I mean, because
Speaker 1: I'm so not involved with our social media stuff because
Speaker 1: it's not my wheelhouse. Um, we we've been apparently all
Speaker 1: of these things have happened all of our accounts, including Facebook.
Speaker 1: I don't even think is allowing us to do anything
Speaker 1: right now, because we would post videos of me on
Speaker 1: this show and I'm sorry audio me on the show
Speaker 1: and videos of me on TV, and they're stopping that
Speaker 1: from going out in full force. But you know the
Speaker 1: idea that you know, all of a sudden, you'd notice
Speaker 1: on Twitter that you know, things that you would normally
Speaker 1: tweet out that would go everywhere. Oh, only like five
Speaker 1: people are watching it. There's no reach for our company
Speaker 1: right now. I remember, you don't you don't get a
Speaker 1: target who have a family incarcerated by a radio ad
Speaker 1: because they're all over the place. So we do social
Speaker 1: media and there are community groups. There are social community
Speaker 1: groups that help these folks when we give tips and
Speaker 1: we help, and that's where they find out that we
Speaker 1: can save the money. And there are a lot of
Speaker 1: scamming companies. We're not one so well. I mean, I mean,
Speaker 1: I'm really worried about. For example, I don't want to
Speaker 1: be on Twitter anymore. And my recommendation of people on
Speaker 1: Twitter is, once Parlor gets up and running, i would
Speaker 1: hashtag Parlor on every tweet for a while and promote
Speaker 1: promote Parlor. Let's see how long that's going to last
Speaker 1: before they shut all of us down. And if you
Speaker 1: mentioned their competition. But now now they've got to go
Speaker 1: through a painful process, and that is to build out
Speaker 1: a separate system, which I you know what, I can't
Speaker 1: even begin to fathom anything computer related, So my head
Speaker 1: hurts thinking about it. But there are smart people that
Speaker 1: can figure all these things out. I'm not one of them.
Speaker 1: I'm not technologically savvy. Well, the really the awesome thing was,
Speaker 1: so it really affects us. We don't have any likes,
Speaker 1: any reach, any shares any nothing. Our phones don't ring,
Speaker 1: and people don't know about it. But two of the
Speaker 1: people who worked on zip files, and I'm sure Linda knows,
Speaker 1: although you're not tech savvy, are trying right now to
Speaker 1: start that format. And mister Keith is right. It takes
Speaker 1: lots of money and lots of teamwork, but they're working.
Speaker 1: I can't talk about it publicly who they are and
Speaker 1: all that I could privately, but not publicly. They're working
Speaker 1: right now, you know. And I'm only saying maybe I
Speaker 1: think I've made a mistake, Donovan. You know I should
Speaker 1: have been because I never really wanted to talk about
Speaker 1: myself that much. I don't think anybody really cares. In
Speaker 1: other words, you know, every every job, every business has
Speaker 1: challenges every day, and one of them that we deal
Speaker 1: with and have been dealing with forever, is an effort
Speaker 1: to silence their show and to silence my hour on
Speaker 1: Fox News because I'm independent, and and maybe I should
Speaker 1: have made people more aware of how bad it gets
Speaker 1: and how bad it's been. It's almost a daily occurrence
Speaker 1: for me to survive and thread the needle to stay
Speaker 1: on the air, and I want to because I know
Speaker 1: that you know, you generously give me this platform. I
Speaker 1: try to be true every day to everything I believe
Speaker 1: in doing work. Nobody else seems to be doing well.
Speaker 1: We'd listen to you. Our company listens to you. We
Speaker 1: support you, and we know that you speak the truth.
Speaker 1: That's where I get my taxophone when I pressed it
Speaker 1: on my personal page. Unfortunately it's affecting our company page.
Speaker 1: But I'm telling you that there is a group of people.
Speaker 1: Ask Glinda bouton fit files. These men are geniuses. It
Speaker 1: takes money and it takes time, but they're trying to
Speaker 1: I do believe that help. Yeah, they're trying to help.
Speaker 1: All right, I appreciate. I hope you can get your
Speaker 1: business up and running Donovan, if we can help stay
Speaker 1: in touch with us. Okay, it sounds like a noble
Speaker 1: business to me. I mean, you're facilitating family togetherness during
Speaker 1: a time of incarceration. Sounds like a compassionate business, affordable way.
Speaker 1: You know, I don't know, the business sounds like the
Speaker 1: lovely person. Why would you stop that from being promoted
Speaker 1: to me? You know, you know how much stress and pressure.
Speaker 1: Just imagine for a second somebody incarcerated trying to stay
Speaker 1: in touch with their children and their family. Had he
Speaker 1: keep the family together while you're away. It's I'm sure
Speaker 1: it's it's already complicated enough. Eight hundred nine for one,
Speaker 1: Shawn is our number. You want to be a part
Speaker 1: of the program, Amy Horowitz at the bottom of the
Speaker 1: hour twenty five to the top of the hour, eight
Speaker 1: hundred and nine four one sewn. You want to be
Speaker 1: a part of this extravaganza. Our friend, documentarian the Crazy
Speaker 1: Amy Horowitz, well his latest video hitting the streets of
Speaker 1: New York, asking New york Is how they feel about
Speaker 1: compromise an individual support. Now, They're all for it unless
Speaker 1: they hear that the person they're compromising with is a
Speaker 1: Trump Republican. Listen, I'm Amy Horowitz, and I'm here in
Speaker 1: the East village. Now the election is over. The Democrats
Speaker 1: have been pushing the message of togetherness and unity, but
Speaker 1: you're neity on whose turns? How important is it? The
Speaker 1: value of toleration is accepting the other complusion. It's the
Speaker 1: most important thing, extremely important. You know that this divisiveness
Speaker 1: in this country is it's become terrible. You'll be compassionate
Speaker 1: and understanding and be as supportive as you can. I
Speaker 1: think it's very important, very important. Yeah, I think it's
Speaker 1: extremely important, very important. I'll never understand fully why people
Speaker 1: spend all their time, you know, trying to hate on
Speaker 1: one group. It's very important. Um, it's one of the
Speaker 1: most important things. I'm one of the most tolerant people
Speaker 1: because I have one of the most empathetic people. Republicans
Speaker 1: have any value at all. Nor your delusion. I mean
Speaker 1: they're literally delusion. They are really really selfish human beings.
Speaker 1: I mean I think they're disgustingly racist. Yeah, A lot
Speaker 1: of the thought do you think monstrous, mindless racist? There's
Speaker 1: a lot of internal mean, the how or the value
Speaker 1: of compromising. I mean you do have to compromise. You
Speaker 1: do have to compromise in unifying. Should we compromise one
Speaker 1: another in order? Absolutely? Absolutely? Yeah. So for example, like
Speaker 1: they would give on my cafe standards that give on
Speaker 1: like fracking, Well, fracking is a touchy issue. Can you
Speaker 1: compromise on climate Absolutely not, There is no compromise. Can
Speaker 1: you see yourself comprovising on climate change? Oh no no.
Speaker 1: Can you compromise on universal healthcare? Uh? No, I meant
Speaker 1: you no. I don't believe universal healthcare, I guess not. No, No,
Speaker 1: other people, governments can do it. So I don't know.
Speaker 1: Might be there's so many issues that I feel like
Speaker 1: there is a very clear answer and this is one
Speaker 1: of them. Can come into following. Yeah, compromise, No, I
Speaker 1: think we should have. You should just have equality issues
Speaker 1: that are important to you, right right, and issues that
Speaker 1: are right for like society and humanity. Wait. So yeah,
Speaker 1: maybe earlier I said compromise them, and maybe now that
Speaker 1: you're making me seither. Yeah, but do you do you
Speaker 1: think that, um, we can unify with Republicans? I guess
Speaker 1: is there a real way I do that? Maybe in
Speaker 1: the far future, and I think right now there is
Speaker 1: that you also gonna wait you to fill the holders? Yeah,
Speaker 1: I know not not to my knowledge. There you have it.
Speaker 1: Amy Harrowitz, documentarian talks to us. Now, well, they're all
Speaker 1: for compromise until you get to fracking, until you get
Speaker 1: to any conservative issue or a freedom of speech for conservatives. No,
Speaker 1: they're racist, they're didn't one did one person say they're rapists?
Speaker 1: I'm like, oh, oh yeah over again. Oh my gosh. Um,
Speaker 1: you know, it's kind of scary, but it's it shows
Speaker 1: there is no tolerance by the left anymore. None whatsoever.
Speaker 1: They want to silence conservative voices. That's who they are.
Speaker 1: It now defines them. I mean, that's becomes so clear
Speaker 1: over the last few days last week, the kicking off
Speaker 1: of parlor, off of cloud services, the you know, banning
Speaker 1: Trump trying to trying to prosecute guys like Josh Holly
Speaker 1: and Ted Cruz. Now when they when the Democrats say unity,
Speaker 1: they mean obviously unity on their terms that solely aligned
Speaker 1: with their ideals and their perspective. They have no interest
Speaker 1: in melting other people's thoughts to try to come up
Speaker 1: with better solutions. The problem is, Sean, once you say
Speaker 1: tolerance is the ultimate value, than anyone who holds intolerant
Speaker 1: views are therefore terrible. And it's a self defeating logic. Right,
Speaker 1: in order sure tolerance that flourishes, you have to eliminate intolerance, right,
Speaker 1: it's actually Marxist thought. Um No, they they do not
Speaker 1: mean tolerance. And by the way, a little bit word
Speaker 1: to the wise, when somebody's says I'm the most tolerant
Speaker 1: and the most episthetic, they're generally not tolerant at all.
Speaker 1: And it was amazing when I actually gave them opportunities
Speaker 1: to say, okay, you want compromise, because they were saying
Speaker 1: how important it is for us to move forward to compromise.
Speaker 1: So I said, Okay, let's come up with some ideas,
Speaker 1: and a one woman goes climate change. Great. The truth is, Sean,
Speaker 1: there's a ton of places we can compromise on right,
Speaker 1: tons of places. There's a there's a story on Fox News.
Speaker 1: Actually it's Fox Business dot Com and the headline is
Speaker 1: Harvard students seek to revoke Trump graduates diplomas after what
Speaker 1: happened at the Capitol, and they're targeting Kaylee mcinaney, Senator
Speaker 1: Ted Cruz, Representative Crenshaw. Now, last year there was an
Speaker 1: effort to ban Trump administration officials for even speaking on campus.
Speaker 1: And now students that the ever prestigious have at university
Speaker 1: are circulating a petition. It calls for revoking the degrees
Speaker 1: from Trump's support orders and aids who went to habvid
Speaker 1: And the reason cited is that supporters of Donald Trump
Speaker 1: were involved in spreading disinformation and mistrust. And I'm like, Okay,
Speaker 1: that's the entire media mob, that is big Tech, that
Speaker 1: is every Democrat out there. I mean, it's it's unbelievable
Speaker 1: and as strangest thing I mean is I'm a conservative,
Speaker 1: and all my career I've never supported a boycott, a firing,
Speaker 1: attempts to silence speech. I don't like going back to
Speaker 1: Bill Maher's politically correct days and even earlier than that. Look,
Speaker 1: I'm not I wasn't smart enough to get into Harvard,
Speaker 1: but no doubt if I was and I tended there,
Speaker 1: I would have been on the list as well. Now
Speaker 1: they've trying to cancel me over and over again. Look
Speaker 1: the obviously they trying to cancel all of us. You
Speaker 1: know you are the top of the list. This is
Speaker 1: they are the most intolerant group we have ever seen. Okay, Bottleway,
Speaker 1: this is nothing new. Again, if you go back to
Speaker 1: to the Soviet Union Stalinism and that their their entire
Speaker 1: business model was through silence and stifle people. Right, this
Speaker 1: is not new among the left the left, and ultimately
Speaker 1: the reason is this they know that in the marketplace
Speaker 1: of ideas they will lose. They have to shut us
Speaker 1: down because they will lose in this country if everybody
Speaker 1: has access to all of these ideas. You know, another
Speaker 1: major part of their inability to compromise if they have
Speaker 1: the people on the left have no connection to anything
Speaker 1: on the right. They don't have friends who on the right.
Speaker 1: If there's family on the rights, they exercise them from
Speaker 1: their from their lives. They don't. We watch Fox News
Speaker 1: or watch euro listen to your show. But we on
Speaker 1: the right have no choice. We have to watch NBC
Speaker 1: and CBS and the entertainment shows and with the New
Speaker 1: York Times because that's the mainstream media. So we have
Speaker 1: more understanding of their ideals and are truly more tolerant.
Speaker 1: But they don't. They don't because they have no access
Speaker 1: to our information whatsoever. You know, it's amazing. Are you
Speaker 1: still doing Stern show? Uh? No, No, he has had
Speaker 1: not had me on for a long time. Yeah, but
Speaker 1: you used to do it, but for years they wanted
Speaker 1: to silence him. You know, I grew up listening to
Speaker 1: controversial radio, him and Imus and talk radio, the pioneers.
Speaker 1: I mean it was you know, you know, it was
Speaker 1: firebrand talk radio in the day, and I grew up
Speaker 1: on it, had an appetite of it. You know, today,
Speaker 1: in this day and age of cancel culture, they just
Speaker 1: want to cancel everybody. And I think I made a mistake.
Speaker 1: I was telling my audience earlier today is that I
Speaker 1: maybe should have spent more time talking about all these
Speaker 1: different efforts to silence conservative voices. It's it's the world
Speaker 1: I live in every single day, and it's it's so
Speaker 1: alien to me, and I've never understood it. If you
Speaker 1: don't like what somebody's saying, you don't have to listen
Speaker 1: to it. I mean, it's not really that complicated, ammy
Speaker 1: you know is you know the problem is is that
Speaker 1: because they've demonized us and spend these years demonizing us,
Speaker 1: what has happened. If these guys are evil, if they're
Speaker 1: if there are all the things people said in my video,
Speaker 1: then therefore we can't have these guys out there. We
Speaker 1: have to destroy them because they've they a self fulfilling prophecy.
Speaker 1: Because once they've demonized us and tell how terrible we are,
Speaker 1: then the the only logical reaction after that is we
Speaker 1: have to destroy them utterly, because how could you deal
Speaker 1: and listen to anything which is evil. That's what they've done.
Speaker 1: Because it demonized us, they have they therefore have to
Speaker 1: try to completely silence us. That's why that is, That's
Speaker 1: why there's a shift now. You also experienced at different
Speaker 1: events when you're just trying to be a newsperson. I
Speaker 1: mean you you've been the target yourself because you're there
Speaker 1: and people associate you with I don't know, maybe people
Speaker 1: have seen you on the TV show or heard you
Speaker 1: on this radio program, but you know you've been a
Speaker 1: target an attacked yourself just for asking questions, that's all
Speaker 1: asking questions. Yeah, not both both on print and in
Speaker 1: media and physically attack for this stuff. Look, you know
Speaker 1: it's so far as in my Wikipedia page in the
Speaker 1: first line that says Ammy Horowitz, right wing filmmaker. And
Speaker 1: if you look at Michael Moore's Wikipedia page, it says
Speaker 1: Michael Moore, American filmmaker. No word of leftists or any
Speaker 1: politics whatsoever in his Wikipedia page in that first paragraph.
Speaker 1: That's I mean, that is what we're dealing with. They
Speaker 1: control all the levels of mainstream media, and I got
Speaker 1: people have got to watch this entire video it's on
Speaker 1: Hannity dot Com, because it really emphasizes and highlights the
Speaker 1: fact these people they will say the words like tolerance
Speaker 1: and unity and compromise, but those words have no meaning
Speaker 1: to them, it doesn't They're just trite statements. So when
Speaker 1: you push them on that, say, well, where can we compromise,
Speaker 1: because you and I do want to compromise. They're nowhere
Speaker 1: to be found. They have no answers because in the
Speaker 1: reality they're hollow words. They don't want to compromise, they
Speaker 1: don't want unity, they want destruction. All right, we really
Speaker 1: appreciate you being with us, Ammy Horowitz. That video that
Speaker 1: he took is on Hannity dot Com. Thank you, sir
Speaker 1: for being with us. Eight hundred nine four one. Sean
Speaker 1: is our number. You want to be a part of
Speaker 1: the program. Sharon is in the great state of California,
Speaker 1: all the People's Republic of California. What's going on, Sharon,
Speaker 1: how are you? I'm great? Thank you so much for
Speaker 1: taking my call, first time caller. I really wanted to
Speaker 1: talk about the cancel culture and the left and how
Speaker 1: it's destroying conservative business and people's lives. But this is
Speaker 1: a very tax base that's needed, especially with the Biden
Speaker 1: tax plans. It just shows the idiocy of the left
Speaker 1: and their disdain for any opposition, no matter what the logic.
Speaker 1: It's just complete intolerance, and it's just shocking that they're
Speaker 1: destroying a tax base. And I'm not quite sure how
Speaker 1: they're going to sustain this much longer. You know, I
Speaker 1: mean a lot of this. You've experienced it out in California.
Speaker 1: It's it's almost mainstream in states like California, New York
Speaker 1: and it's you know, the look at Ami Horowitz's tape.
Speaker 1: It is taken in New York City. What do you expect.
Speaker 1: There's such intolerance. It's worrisome, it's concerning, you know, the
Speaker 1: halls of Congress now you know, snap impeachment. They needed
Speaker 1: an investigation, We needed to figure out how this happened.
Speaker 1: Now we're learning so much more that they had indications
Speaker 1: that they were organizers to this even before the day came,
Speaker 1: and request for the National Guard were denied, even as
Speaker 1: it was beginning to unfold. Those requests denied. Now the
Speaker 1: Washington Times and their report and other news reports from
Speaker 1: other outlets, even fake news CNN, even the Washington Post
Speaker 1: about specific calls, specific threats. Washington Times saying that initial
Speaker 1: court documents two suspects arriving on or before January sixth,
Speaker 1: with explosives, tactical gear, cashes of weapons. Facebook comes under fight.
Speaker 1: They failed to remove stop the steel pages allegedly used
Speaker 1: by organizers weeks and even months ahead of the rally
Speaker 1: that they had a problem with Washington Post. The FBI
Speaker 1: knew beforehand for plans of a quote war at the Capitol.
Speaker 1: These are these are organizers now and you know, getting
Speaker 1: to the bottom of this is pivotal because this is
Speaker 1: our country. For crying out loud, you know, this to
Speaker 1: me is we have shown every enemy of the United
Speaker 1: States that a vulnerability that I it is frightening to
Speaker 1: me that this could happen at our capital and that
Speaker 1: we did nothing to prevent it, and that they had
Speaker 1: early indications and request for help and support. You know,
Speaker 1: we're denied. How does that happen? It's shocking, and I'm
Speaker 1: saddened that the impeachment went sit through so quickly without
Speaker 1: any investigation. Within a day we had the information public,
Speaker 1: but it was known prior. It's very very difficult times
Speaker 1: for our country, and I'm quite concerned, but I do
Speaker 1: good people should be thank everybody that speaks out and
Speaker 1: speaks up to do what we can to bring this
Speaker 1: to the forefront. There is no tolerance and it's just
Speaker 1: idiocy on their part and people need to look at
Speaker 1: that deeply. Thank you, we appreciate it. Remember Chuck Schumer said,
Speaker 1: you know, don't mess with the intel community there or
Speaker 1: intelligence community, they'll get eight ways and Sunday. Wow, you
Speaker 1: know I experienced that first hand. President elects latest unsolicited
Speaker 1: pronouncement on the intelligence community. This was history just a
Speaker 1: little while ago tonight, and you see the scare quotes there.
Speaker 1: The intelligence briefing on so called Russian hacking was delayed
Speaker 1: until Friday, perhaps more time needed to build a case.
Speaker 1: Very strange. He's taking these shots, this antagonisms, taunting to
Speaker 1: the intelligent teunity. You take on the intelligence community, they
Speaker 1: have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you.
Speaker 1: So even for a practical, supposedly hard nosed businessman, he's
Speaker 1: being really dumb to do this. Don't dare expose the
Speaker 1: deep state? Is that why I have three O two's
Speaker 1: on me? That's why I had personal text messages with
Speaker 1: Paul Manner for it released. All right, that's gonna wrap
Speaker 1: things up for today. Let not your heart be troubled.
Speaker 1: Hope you set your DVR. Hannity Big Show tonight nine
Speaker 1: Eastern on the Fox News Channel. Now, even the mob,
Speaker 1: the media realizing, oh investigators are now pursuing signs the
Speaker 1: Capitol riot was planned. Even fake news CNN has that headline. Okay, anyway,
Speaker 1: we'll get to the bottom of it. Also, the release
Speaker 1: of this trove of FBI memos nine Eastern. Set your DVR, Hannity,
Speaker 1: Fox News. Have a great weekend. We'll see you back
Speaker 1: here on Monday.