WEBVTT - Daybreak Weekend: Fed Meeting, BOE Decision, BOJ Policy

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news.

0:00:10.560 --> 0:00:12.800
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg day Break Weekend, our global look at

0:00:12.840 --> 0:00:15.080
<v Speaker 2>the top stories in the coming week from our Daybreak

0:00:15.080 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 2>anchors all around the world. Straight ahead on the program, Well,

0:00:17.840 --> 0:00:20.599
<v Speaker 2>look ahead to this week's monetary policy decision from the

0:00:20.640 --> 0:00:23.560
<v Speaker 2>Fed what it means for interest rates. I'm Tom Busby

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:24.160
<v Speaker 2>in New York.

0:00:24.400 --> 0:00:26.759
<v Speaker 3>I'm Caroline Hepkea in London, where we're looking at whether

0:00:26.840 --> 0:00:29.720
<v Speaker 3>the Bank of England does decide to hold steady on

0:00:29.840 --> 0:00:30.680
<v Speaker 3>interest rates.

0:00:30.920 --> 0:00:33.400
<v Speaker 4>I'm Doug Prisner looking at the challenges for the Bank

0:00:33.440 --> 0:00:36.960
<v Speaker 4>of Japan as it faces a decision on interest rates

0:00:36.960 --> 0:00:37.800
<v Speaker 4>in the coming week.

0:00:38.520 --> 0:00:42.560
<v Speaker 1>That's all straight ahead on Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend on Bloomberg

0:00:42.600 --> 0:00:46.280
<v Speaker 1>eleven three zero, New York, Bloomberg ninety nine to one, Washington, DC,

0:00:46.800 --> 0:00:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg ninety two to nine, Boston, DAB Digital Radio, London,

0:00:51.479 --> 0:00:54.680
<v Speaker 1>Sirius XM one twenty one, and around the world on

0:00:54.720 --> 0:00:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio, dot Com and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:01:02.720 --> 0:01:03.280
<v Speaker 5>Good day to you.

0:01:03.360 --> 0:01:06.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tom Busby. We begin today's program with the Federal Reserve,

0:01:06.920 --> 0:01:09.920
<v Speaker 2>the FED, concluding its latest two day meeting, issuing a

0:01:10.040 --> 0:01:13.160
<v Speaker 2>monetary policy decision on Wednesday, and for more on what

0:01:13.240 --> 0:01:17.399
<v Speaker 2>to expect, what policymakers are watching, we're joined by Michael McKee,

0:01:17.400 --> 0:01:22.520
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg International Economics and Policy correspondent. Well, Michael, no change

0:01:22.560 --> 0:01:25.240
<v Speaker 2>in rates in three earlier FED meetings so far this year.

0:01:25.640 --> 0:01:27.759
<v Speaker 2>What are you expecting to hear from the Federal Open

0:01:27.800 --> 0:01:29.479
<v Speaker 2>Market Committee this Wednesday?

0:01:30.360 --> 0:01:33.360
<v Speaker 6>The headline will be no change in race, and I

0:01:33.440 --> 0:01:35.400
<v Speaker 6>think we're going to see that for a little while

0:01:35.800 --> 0:01:39.080
<v Speaker 6>this meeting and then probably the July meeting. It probably

0:01:39.120 --> 0:01:42.520
<v Speaker 6>won't be until September that the Fed has enough of

0:01:42.560 --> 0:01:45.400
<v Speaker 6>a feel for the economy to know whether anything else

0:01:45.520 --> 0:01:50.960
<v Speaker 6>needs to be done. Right now, inflation is under control, basically,

0:01:51.000 --> 0:01:54.120
<v Speaker 6>we saw this last week CPI and PPI come in

0:01:54.200 --> 0:01:58.560
<v Speaker 6>lower than expected. There were some tariff related increases in

0:01:58.640 --> 0:02:01.800
<v Speaker 6>some categories, but nothing that screams problems for the Fed

0:02:01.920 --> 0:02:05.440
<v Speaker 6>at the moment. But all the tariffs haven't been put

0:02:05.480 --> 0:02:07.600
<v Speaker 6>on yet, so they're going to have to wait and

0:02:07.640 --> 0:02:11.760
<v Speaker 6>see the June inflation numbers and the July inflation numbers

0:02:11.840 --> 0:02:14.160
<v Speaker 6>before they might want to make any changes.

0:02:14.360 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 2>Well, that's the wild card in all this, and we're

0:02:16.440 --> 0:02:18.160
<v Speaker 2>looking at a date right now, and of course this

0:02:18.200 --> 0:02:22.760
<v Speaker 2>is fluid and always changing. July ninth, when the president's

0:02:22.840 --> 0:02:26.919
<v Speaker 2>ninety day you know, pause on tariffs goes into effect.

0:02:27.160 --> 0:02:29.440
<v Speaker 2>I guess after that things could really change.

0:02:29.600 --> 0:02:33.920
<v Speaker 6>They could really change if indeed the tariff's go into effect.

0:02:33.919 --> 0:02:36.320
<v Speaker 6>That's the problem for the FED is nobody has any

0:02:36.320 --> 0:02:39.639
<v Speaker 6>idea what Donald Trump is going to do, so it's

0:02:39.680 --> 0:02:43.760
<v Speaker 6>impossible to model what's going to happen. He raised steel

0:02:43.800 --> 0:02:49.360
<v Speaker 6>tariffs to twenty five percent, and then in the PPI

0:02:49.480 --> 0:02:52.519
<v Speaker 6>we saw that steel prices were up seven percent last month,

0:02:52.600 --> 0:02:54.960
<v Speaker 6>So there is a cause and effect there that will

0:02:55.000 --> 0:02:58.440
<v Speaker 6>probably feed into other categories in the CPI and PPI,

0:02:58.600 --> 0:03:01.440
<v Speaker 6>depending on what gets tarff when it gets tariffed, how

0:03:01.520 --> 0:03:05.360
<v Speaker 6>much the tariffs are, and when they take effect. So

0:03:05.520 --> 0:03:07.679
<v Speaker 6>it's really hard for the FED to think anything other

0:03:07.720 --> 0:03:11.640
<v Speaker 6>than we don't need to do anything because inflation is

0:03:12.200 --> 0:03:16.079
<v Speaker 6>under control and at this point the economy is hanging

0:03:16.080 --> 0:03:16.400
<v Speaker 6>in there.

0:03:16.440 --> 0:03:16.639
<v Speaker 5>Now.

0:03:17.600 --> 0:03:19.960
<v Speaker 6>Jobless claims are a little elevated, but it's a seasonal

0:03:19.960 --> 0:03:23.800
<v Speaker 6>adjustment time of year, so maybe they're not signaling a

0:03:23.919 --> 0:03:27.440
<v Speaker 6>terrible change in the labor market. But I Fed'll be

0:03:27.560 --> 0:03:29.840
<v Speaker 6>keeping an eye on those two things to see if

0:03:30.240 --> 0:03:32.680
<v Speaker 6>there is any move either direction needed.

0:03:33.160 --> 0:03:36.640
<v Speaker 2>Another thing is economic growth, because the fear of these tariks,

0:03:36.680 --> 0:03:40.200
<v Speaker 2>the fear of inflation, really changed things in two earlier

0:03:40.240 --> 0:03:43.080
<v Speaker 2>readings on GDP in the first quarter, and we're going

0:03:43.160 --> 0:03:44.520
<v Speaker 2>to get a third reading pretty soon.

0:03:44.480 --> 0:03:47.560
<v Speaker 6>Right, Yes, we'll get a third reading. That will be

0:03:47.600 --> 0:03:51.600
<v Speaker 6>the final reading for the month, and what we're going

0:03:51.640 --> 0:03:56.000
<v Speaker 6>to see is basically little change. But then we'll get

0:03:56.040 --> 0:03:58.480
<v Speaker 6>the second quarter numbers and we'll see a big change

0:03:58.520 --> 0:04:01.400
<v Speaker 6>because in the first quarter grow was held down by

0:04:01.600 --> 0:04:04.040
<v Speaker 6>the fact that we imported a lot of stuff as

0:04:04.080 --> 0:04:07.280
<v Speaker 6>people tried to front run the tariffs, and that is

0:04:07.720 --> 0:04:11.960
<v Speaker 6>basically comes out of GDP, so we had a negative print.

0:04:12.160 --> 0:04:16.520
<v Speaker 6>But in the current quarter, the second quarter, people are

0:04:16.600 --> 0:04:19.800
<v Speaker 6>not buying a lot of imports. Imports are way down,

0:04:19.880 --> 0:04:23.599
<v Speaker 6>so that will artificially add to GDP. So again for

0:04:23.640 --> 0:04:26.880
<v Speaker 6>the fat they'll probably average the two quarters, but it

0:04:26.920 --> 0:04:29.000
<v Speaker 6>isn't going to be a clean read on exactly what's

0:04:29.040 --> 0:04:30.120
<v Speaker 6>happening now.

0:04:30.160 --> 0:04:34.560
<v Speaker 2>People, you say, are buying fewer of the imports, but

0:04:34.640 --> 0:04:39.600
<v Speaker 2>are we still seeing jittery consumers, especially lower end consumers

0:04:39.680 --> 0:04:41.320
<v Speaker 2>holding back on all purchases.

0:04:41.720 --> 0:04:43.880
<v Speaker 6>We're seeing jittery consumers, but they don't seem to be

0:04:43.920 --> 0:04:48.480
<v Speaker 6>holding back on all purchases. Right now, consumers seem willing

0:04:48.560 --> 0:04:52.240
<v Speaker 6>to spend on what they need to spend on. Gasoline

0:04:52.279 --> 0:04:54.560
<v Speaker 6>prices have come down. That gives people a little bit

0:04:54.560 --> 0:04:56.560
<v Speaker 6>of a tailwind, little bit of extra money to spend

0:04:56.600 --> 0:04:59.839
<v Speaker 6>on other things, which food prices went up, so that

0:05:00.120 --> 0:05:02.400
<v Speaker 6>the other thing that they watch closely. But this is

0:05:02.440 --> 0:05:05.360
<v Speaker 6>also not a period of time when there is a

0:05:05.400 --> 0:05:08.760
<v Speaker 6>lot of what we would call extra spending because we're

0:05:08.880 --> 0:05:13.640
<v Speaker 6>past the holidays now, we're waiting for basically back to school,

0:05:13.680 --> 0:05:16.280
<v Speaker 6>which will start in July, and if people are going

0:05:16.320 --> 0:05:18.480
<v Speaker 6>to be spending a lot on that or whether they're

0:05:18.480 --> 0:05:21.919
<v Speaker 6>going to hold off. One thing that we are watching

0:05:22.600 --> 0:05:26.560
<v Speaker 6>these days is vacations. Airfares are way down because air

0:05:26.600 --> 0:05:29.160
<v Speaker 6>travel is way down. Hotels are down. These are the

0:05:29.160 --> 0:05:30.840
<v Speaker 6>time of years when you would think they would go up,

0:05:30.880 --> 0:05:33.720
<v Speaker 6>but the prices of those things have come down because

0:05:33.760 --> 0:05:36.200
<v Speaker 6>people aren't traveling as much, which is a sign of

0:05:36.920 --> 0:05:38.320
<v Speaker 6>some nervousness.

0:05:38.640 --> 0:05:40.479
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk about the future of the FED, because this

0:05:40.560 --> 0:05:44.440
<v Speaker 2>has been a subject last week. Jerome Pal's eight year

0:05:44.520 --> 0:05:47.600
<v Speaker 2>tenure as FED chair will end in May of next year.

0:05:48.120 --> 0:05:51.760
<v Speaker 2>We know what President Trump says about him what's next

0:05:51.760 --> 0:05:54.159
<v Speaker 2>for the FED. And I know that there's one big

0:05:54.240 --> 0:05:54.880
<v Speaker 2>name out there.

0:05:55.240 --> 0:05:56.800
<v Speaker 6>Well, there are a couple of big names out there,

0:05:56.839 --> 0:05:59.440
<v Speaker 6>because the President has made no secret of people that

0:05:59.480 --> 0:06:04.960
<v Speaker 6>he thinks could be FED chair. Along with Scott Besson,

0:06:05.040 --> 0:06:08.080
<v Speaker 6>whom you're referring to this last week Bloomberg reporting he's

0:06:08.080 --> 0:06:13.240
<v Speaker 6>on the list, Kevin Walsh, the former FED governor, has

0:06:13.279 --> 0:06:15.800
<v Speaker 6>been on the list twice. He was on the list

0:06:15.839 --> 0:06:20.480
<v Speaker 6>before Jay Powell was chosen, and then Kevin Hassett, who

0:06:20.560 --> 0:06:24.320
<v Speaker 6>is the director of the National Economic Council. So there

0:06:24.400 --> 0:06:28.160
<v Speaker 6>are a number of names out there. The question is

0:06:28.520 --> 0:06:32.640
<v Speaker 6>what does Trump really want. The feeling has been and

0:06:32.720 --> 0:06:35.480
<v Speaker 6>the impression you get from Donald Trump is that he

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:38.599
<v Speaker 6>wants somebody who's going to cut interest rates. We don't

0:06:38.680 --> 0:06:42.960
<v Speaker 6>know a lot about what Scott Besson thinks about rates.

0:06:43.080 --> 0:06:46.120
<v Speaker 6>We do know that Kevin Walsh, as much as Trump

0:06:46.240 --> 0:06:48.640
<v Speaker 6>likes him, has been a hawk all his life on inflation.

0:06:48.760 --> 0:06:50.799
<v Speaker 6>So he's probably not going to be ready to cut

0:06:51.400 --> 0:06:55.080
<v Speaker 6>interest rates so right away. And the issue for the

0:06:55.120 --> 0:06:58.679
<v Speaker 6>President is he can fill one seat for a governor

0:06:58.680 --> 0:07:02.040
<v Speaker 6>whose term is expiring in January, Adriana Kugler, and then

0:07:02.080 --> 0:07:06.520
<v Speaker 6>he could fill the pole seat if j Powell resigns

0:07:06.560 --> 0:07:10.200
<v Speaker 6>as a governor when his term as FED chair is up,

0:07:10.840 --> 0:07:13.800
<v Speaker 6>so he's got one or two seats, and the FED

0:07:14.280 --> 0:07:17.840
<v Speaker 6>will not otherwise turn over during his term, so he

0:07:17.880 --> 0:07:21.560
<v Speaker 6>doesn't have an opportunity to pick enough people to influence

0:07:21.600 --> 0:07:24.200
<v Speaker 6>monetary policy. Even if he got somebody who walked in

0:07:24.240 --> 0:07:26.360
<v Speaker 6>the door and said, I want us all the cut raids,

0:07:26.480 --> 0:07:28.120
<v Speaker 6>the rest of the FED isn't going to go along

0:07:28.200 --> 0:07:30.760
<v Speaker 6>if they see inflation is still a danger.

0:07:31.120 --> 0:07:32.760
<v Speaker 2>Well, a lot to look forward to, and we can

0:07:32.800 --> 0:07:35.680
<v Speaker 2>look for the Fed's next decision on interest rates this Wednesday,

0:07:35.680 --> 0:07:38.600
<v Speaker 2>two pm Wall Street Time and our thanks to Michael McKee,

0:07:38.600 --> 0:07:42.480
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberger International Economics and Policy correspondent. We moved now to

0:07:42.520 --> 0:07:45.480
<v Speaker 2>a closer look at the troubled US housing industry, which

0:07:45.480 --> 0:07:48.520
<v Speaker 2>has been stung by stubbornly high interest rates, sky high

0:07:48.600 --> 0:07:51.280
<v Speaker 2>home prices, and a lot of economic uncertainty. And this

0:07:51.400 --> 0:07:53.880
<v Speaker 2>week we get housing starts for the month of May

0:07:53.920 --> 0:07:56.120
<v Speaker 2>and the latest earnings from one of the nation's biggest

0:07:56.120 --> 0:07:58.880
<v Speaker 2>home builders. For more on what all this might tell

0:07:58.960 --> 0:08:01.160
<v Speaker 2>us about the state of the house sector, we're joined

0:08:01.160 --> 0:08:06.160
<v Speaker 2>by Drew Reading Bloomberg Intelligence US Home building analyst, Well, Drew,

0:08:06.240 --> 0:08:08.640
<v Speaker 2>let's start with those earnings I'm out on Monday from

0:08:08.640 --> 0:08:11.600
<v Speaker 2>the Miami based builder Lenar, because I think they may

0:08:11.640 --> 0:08:14.240
<v Speaker 2>illustrate a lot of the challenge the home building industry

0:08:14.280 --> 0:08:16.680
<v Speaker 2>is facing right now, a lot of those challenges. So

0:08:16.960 --> 0:08:18.240
<v Speaker 2>what do you expect to see?

0:08:19.000 --> 0:08:21.800
<v Speaker 5>So, the two main things that investors focus on for

0:08:21.880 --> 0:08:25.480
<v Speaker 5>the builders are orders in gross margin. Now, among the

0:08:25.600 --> 0:08:29.320
<v Speaker 5>large publicly traded home builders, Lenars operating a somewhat unique

0:08:29.320 --> 0:08:33.240
<v Speaker 5>strategy in that they're focused primarily on driving pace, so

0:08:33.320 --> 0:08:36.920
<v Speaker 5>higher sales absorptions over price, and they've been willing to

0:08:36.960 --> 0:08:39.600
<v Speaker 5>sacrifice their gross margin to do so. So they'll give

0:08:39.679 --> 0:08:41.920
<v Speaker 5>us a good read on demand trends. We've heard from

0:08:42.040 --> 0:08:45.200
<v Speaker 5>some other builders. You know that the market softened in April.

0:08:45.240 --> 0:08:47.800
<v Speaker 5>We saw that in the data, but maybe improved a

0:08:47.800 --> 0:08:49.720
<v Speaker 5>little bit in May. So we think that any pickup

0:08:49.720 --> 0:08:54.040
<v Speaker 5>in demand is still likely the result of an elevated

0:08:54.160 --> 0:08:56.080
<v Speaker 5>use of sales and incentives. Builders have had to be

0:08:56.120 --> 0:08:58.880
<v Speaker 5>really aggressive. So we're looking for order growth of about

0:08:58.960 --> 0:09:02.400
<v Speaker 5>eight percent with a margin just under eighteen percent, But

0:09:02.440 --> 0:09:06.280
<v Speaker 5>we expect the company to communicate further pressure through the

0:09:06.320 --> 0:09:09.560
<v Speaker 5>remainder of the year. You know, during the first quarter

0:09:09.600 --> 0:09:12.200
<v Speaker 5>a number of builders actually reduced their full year guidance

0:09:12.240 --> 0:09:15.320
<v Speaker 5>for closings, but just given Lenar's business model, we think

0:09:15.320 --> 0:09:18.240
<v Speaker 5>there's probably less risk for this. So you know, they're

0:09:18.280 --> 0:09:21.200
<v Speaker 5>expecting to close eighty six to eighty eight thousand homes

0:09:21.200 --> 0:09:24.520
<v Speaker 5>this year, and really their primary objective is to turn

0:09:24.720 --> 0:09:29.840
<v Speaker 5>through their inventory to generate cash and drive shareholder friendly actions.

0:09:30.440 --> 0:09:32.880
<v Speaker 2>Now, also this week we get housing starts for May.

0:09:33.160 --> 0:09:34.560
<v Speaker 2>So what do you expect to see there?

0:09:35.160 --> 0:09:37.600
<v Speaker 5>Housing starts has been trending lower over the last several months.

0:09:37.640 --> 0:09:39.839
<v Speaker 5>I think we're down about seven percent year to date

0:09:39.840 --> 0:09:42.800
<v Speaker 5>on the single family side, and we expect builders to

0:09:42.840 --> 0:09:47.320
<v Speaker 5>maintain this more cautious approach to production. You've got the

0:09:47.360 --> 0:09:51.880
<v Speaker 5>combination of weak demand trends along with rapidly increasing inventory levels,

0:09:52.920 --> 0:09:55.360
<v Speaker 5>including one of the highest levels of completed new home

0:09:55.400 --> 0:09:57.599
<v Speaker 5>inventory since two thousand and nine. So you're going to

0:09:57.640 --> 0:10:00.880
<v Speaker 5>see builders continue to utilize incentives to work through the

0:10:00.960 --> 0:10:04.319
<v Speaker 5>existing inventory before putting new projects in the grounds.

0:10:04.440 --> 0:10:07.200
<v Speaker 2>Well, let's talk about some of those incentives. What are

0:10:07.240 --> 0:10:08.280
<v Speaker 2>the more popular ones.

0:10:08.920 --> 0:10:11.560
<v Speaker 5>So I think it's pretty well understood that builders have

0:10:11.600 --> 0:10:14.160
<v Speaker 5>been aggressive in the use of mortgage rate buydowns to

0:10:14.200 --> 0:10:19.280
<v Speaker 5>help with the affordability equation. Generally speaking, we think builders

0:10:19.360 --> 0:10:21.360
<v Speaker 5>like to maintain a spread of about one hundred to

0:10:21.360 --> 0:10:24.960
<v Speaker 5>one hundred and fifty basis points versus the headline mortgage rate,

0:10:25.000 --> 0:10:28.640
<v Speaker 5>which is just under seven percent right now. I mean,

0:10:28.679 --> 0:10:31.240
<v Speaker 5>we've seen some builders be even more aggressive getting rates

0:10:31.280 --> 0:10:34.440
<v Speaker 5>into the five percent range, But it's really dependent on

0:10:34.480 --> 0:10:37.120
<v Speaker 5>the buyer. So in addition to what they're doing on

0:10:37.160 --> 0:10:39.400
<v Speaker 5>the buydown side, you also have others who would rather

0:10:39.520 --> 0:10:43.760
<v Speaker 5>up for closing costs, assistance, or credits towards structural options

0:10:44.000 --> 0:10:47.640
<v Speaker 5>or design options. Typically you'll see the first time or

0:10:47.800 --> 0:10:50.640
<v Speaker 5>entry level buyer opt for the rate buydown because they're

0:10:50.640 --> 0:10:53.720
<v Speaker 5>more dependent on that monthly payment, while buyers you know

0:10:53.760 --> 0:10:56.160
<v Speaker 5>with a stronger profile in the move up or second

0:10:56.160 --> 0:10:59.800
<v Speaker 5>time move up market will typically look for, you know,

0:11:00.400 --> 0:11:03.320
<v Speaker 5>credits towards structural and design options.

0:11:03.600 --> 0:11:07.000
<v Speaker 2>Are you seeing anything from the Trump administration that is,

0:11:07.200 --> 0:11:11.040
<v Speaker 2>any moves to help home buying, to help you know,

0:11:11.080 --> 0:11:15.359
<v Speaker 2>people secure loans. I know, some of the mortgage guarantee

0:11:15.400 --> 0:11:17.719
<v Speaker 2>those those you know Fanny made, Freddie mac There's a

0:11:17.760 --> 0:11:20.640
<v Speaker 2>lot of movement there, but what is being done out

0:11:20.679 --> 0:11:21.320
<v Speaker 2>of Washington?

0:11:22.440 --> 0:11:24.200
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, so you know, there was a big topic of

0:11:24.240 --> 0:11:27.400
<v Speaker 5>discussion on the campaign trail. There hasn't been a whole

0:11:27.400 --> 0:11:29.600
<v Speaker 5>lot of movement right now. I mean the three biggest

0:11:29.600 --> 0:11:33.120
<v Speaker 5>things I think from the political spectrum. People are looking

0:11:33.160 --> 0:11:36.960
<v Speaker 5>at our tariffs, which you know, thankfully for the builders,

0:11:37.240 --> 0:11:39.800
<v Speaker 5>is less of a concern perhaps than it was, you know,

0:11:39.840 --> 0:11:43.959
<v Speaker 5>a month or so ago, as well as immigration and deregulation.

0:11:44.920 --> 0:11:47.200
<v Speaker 5>You know, I think there's more focus on immigration. You

0:11:47.280 --> 0:11:49.720
<v Speaker 5>mentioned that, you know, we're starting to see more ice rates.

0:11:50.040 --> 0:11:52.559
<v Speaker 5>It's certainly a headline risk to the industry. You've got

0:11:53.040 --> 0:11:56.080
<v Speaker 5>more than thirty percent of trade contractors are farm born,

0:11:56.120 --> 0:11:58.040
<v Speaker 5>and there's estimates you know that one and ten may

0:11:58.080 --> 0:12:01.320
<v Speaker 5>be undocumented. Now, most of the builders that we've talked

0:12:01.320 --> 0:12:03.800
<v Speaker 5>to have acknowledged that this is a risk, but I

0:12:03.800 --> 0:12:06.360
<v Speaker 5>think to this point there there hasn't been too much

0:12:06.440 --> 0:12:10.040
<v Speaker 5>of an impact on the actual job site. You know,

0:12:10.120 --> 0:12:12.160
<v Speaker 5>this is as you mentioned before, the lack of tree

0:12:12.240 --> 0:12:15.040
<v Speaker 5>labor has been an ongoing issue for the industry really

0:12:15.080 --> 0:12:17.319
<v Speaker 5>since the last downturn, because you have a lot of

0:12:17.360 --> 0:12:20.320
<v Speaker 5>people switch industries, You've had a lot of people age

0:12:20.360 --> 0:12:23.560
<v Speaker 5>out of the industries, so you know, that's really been

0:12:23.600 --> 0:12:25.760
<v Speaker 5>a focal point for the last several years. And to

0:12:25.800 --> 0:12:29.080
<v Speaker 5>the extent that you know that the labor market tightens

0:12:29.160 --> 0:12:31.920
<v Speaker 5>up further because we're we're losing some more of the workforce.

0:12:32.280 --> 0:12:34.440
<v Speaker 5>Now you're looking at the cost impact for the builders.

0:12:34.720 --> 0:12:36.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, just another challenge for those builders.

0:12:36.800 --> 0:12:36.959
<v Speaker 5>Well.

0:12:36.960 --> 0:12:40.959
<v Speaker 2>Our thanks to Drew Redding, Bloomberg Intelligence US home building analyst.

0:12:41.280 --> 0:12:43.320
<v Speaker 2>Coming up on Bloomberg day Break weekend, we'll look at

0:12:43.320 --> 0:12:45.880
<v Speaker 2>whether the Bank of England will decide to hold steady

0:12:45.880 --> 0:12:49.600
<v Speaker 2>on interest rates. I'm Tom Busby and this is Bloomberg.

0:12:59.280 --> 0:13:01.760
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Daybreak weekend, our global look ahead at

0:13:01.800 --> 0:13:04.320
<v Speaker 2>the top stories for investors in the coming week. I'm

0:13:04.360 --> 0:13:07.240
<v Speaker 2>Tom Busby in New York. Up later in our program

0:13:07.240 --> 0:13:09.360
<v Speaker 2>a look ahead to the Bank of Japan meeting and

0:13:09.360 --> 0:13:12.679
<v Speaker 2>what that could mean for monetary policy moving forward. But first,

0:13:12.679 --> 0:13:16.000
<v Speaker 2>the Bank of England policymakers will once again gather on

0:13:16.040 --> 0:13:19.720
<v Speaker 2>Threadneedle Street to determine the country's interest rate path. How

0:13:19.760 --> 0:13:23.800
<v Speaker 2>will the Monetary Policy Committee deal with inflationary pressures as

0:13:23.840 --> 0:13:27.760
<v Speaker 2>the UK economy and the employment market soften. For more,

0:13:27.880 --> 0:13:30.000
<v Speaker 2>Let's go to London and bring in Bloomberg Daybreak. Euro

0:13:30.120 --> 0:13:32.280
<v Speaker 2>banker Caroline hepgar Tom.

0:13:32.400 --> 0:13:35.520
<v Speaker 3>The Bank of England has been slowly cutting interest rates

0:13:35.520 --> 0:13:39.160
<v Speaker 3>since last year, lowering boring costs twice in twenty twenty

0:13:39.240 --> 0:13:43.280
<v Speaker 3>five to four and a quarter percent, but tax rises

0:13:43.320 --> 0:13:48.040
<v Speaker 3>in April, including on employers from higher national insurance contributions,

0:13:48.080 --> 0:13:52.000
<v Speaker 3>have pushed inflation up. There's a big question about how

0:13:52.040 --> 0:13:55.160
<v Speaker 3>the bank deals with this amid an economy in the

0:13:55.280 --> 0:13:58.880
<v Speaker 3>UK that appears to be losing some steam. So do

0:13:59.000 --> 0:14:02.360
<v Speaker 3>the nine member committee at the Bank of England opt

0:14:02.360 --> 0:14:05.440
<v Speaker 3>to skip a rate cut this month and what then

0:14:05.600 --> 0:14:09.240
<v Speaker 3>of the rest of the year? Economic growth began twenty

0:14:09.320 --> 0:14:12.200
<v Speaker 3>twenty five with a bang, it's now dealing with the

0:14:12.240 --> 0:14:16.480
<v Speaker 3>fallout of some US tariffs, and the Bank's decision comes

0:14:16.520 --> 0:14:19.240
<v Speaker 3>only a few days after the Chancellor set out the

0:14:19.240 --> 0:14:22.200
<v Speaker 3>government's spending plans for the next three to four years,

0:14:22.560 --> 0:14:25.840
<v Speaker 3>a record funding boost for the National Health Service but

0:14:26.040 --> 0:14:29.760
<v Speaker 3>tighter budgets for less favored government departments.

0:14:30.080 --> 0:14:30.240
<v Speaker 5>Well.

0:14:30.320 --> 0:14:34.200
<v Speaker 3>Joining me is Bloomberg's chief UK economist, Dan Hanson and

0:14:34.280 --> 0:14:37.320
<v Speaker 3>our senior economics reporter Phil Aldrich. Very good to have

0:14:37.400 --> 0:14:39.640
<v Speaker 3>both of you with me. What do you make of

0:14:39.640 --> 0:14:41.800
<v Speaker 3>the economic picture in the UK right now and whether

0:14:41.840 --> 0:14:47.560
<v Speaker 3>it means interest rate cuts coming. Has the inflation outlook improved?

0:14:49.040 --> 0:14:53.080
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, obviously, as Dan said that there's been a there's

0:14:53.080 --> 0:14:55.600
<v Speaker 7>this temporary hump in inflation which is caused by a

0:14:55.600 --> 0:15:00.680
<v Speaker 7>holload of regulatory household bills which would uterize and that

0:15:00.800 --> 0:15:02.760
<v Speaker 7>increase has happened, and so we've seen that bump. So

0:15:03.000 --> 0:15:05.200
<v Speaker 7>the Bank is trying to look through it and that

0:15:05.440 --> 0:15:08.880
<v Speaker 7>and they're looking particularly at wages and the labor market.

0:15:08.920 --> 0:15:11.840
<v Speaker 7>I mean, you'd hear this from members of the committee

0:15:12.400 --> 0:15:16.640
<v Speaker 7>and that you know that the process is proceeding there,

0:15:17.000 --> 0:15:19.760
<v Speaker 7>they would like it to be proceeding faster, for them

0:15:19.760 --> 0:15:26.080
<v Speaker 7>to cut faster. There's this they have this quarterly trajectory

0:15:26.160 --> 0:15:28.200
<v Speaker 7>for interest rate cuts when they which is which is

0:15:28.200 --> 0:15:31.800
<v Speaker 7>communicated through the gradual and careful language, which remains in place.

0:15:31.840 --> 0:15:33.640
<v Speaker 7>So you don't think, I mean, it doesn't look like

0:15:33.680 --> 0:15:37.320
<v Speaker 7>the governor wants to move from that quarterly pace of cuts.

0:15:37.360 --> 0:15:39.600
<v Speaker 7>And you know, two of the internal members at the

0:15:39.600 --> 0:15:44.400
<v Speaker 7>bank are actually quite hawkish and they don't so Hugh

0:15:44.480 --> 0:15:48.960
<v Speaker 7>pill has already skipped one meeting, so he's voted not

0:15:49.080 --> 0:15:51.760
<v Speaker 7>to cut when when everyone is expecting him to. And

0:15:51.840 --> 0:15:55.360
<v Speaker 7>Clai Lombardelli, who's the Deputy Governor Hughes, the chief economist,

0:15:55.600 --> 0:15:59.480
<v Speaker 7>that they prepare the forecasts, and she and Hugh are

0:15:59.600 --> 0:16:03.400
<v Speaker 7>clearly quite concerned about the stickiness of inflation in the UK.

0:16:03.520 --> 0:16:06.360
<v Speaker 7>So there is that you've got to think about the

0:16:06.480 --> 0:16:08.920
<v Speaker 7>nine member committee when you're thinking about whether the bank

0:16:09.000 --> 0:16:10.280
<v Speaker 7>is going to cut, and you've got to think about

0:16:10.280 --> 0:16:12.960
<v Speaker 7>who you know, they've got to get five people doing it,

0:16:13.000 --> 0:16:14.840
<v Speaker 7>and I think that will be tricky in June. I

0:16:15.080 --> 0:16:17.000
<v Speaker 7>would have thought that in August it's pretty I mean

0:16:17.040 --> 0:16:18.560
<v Speaker 7>it is nailed on in the markets, it seems to

0:16:18.600 --> 0:16:21.560
<v Speaker 7>be completely nailed on, and the economic situation in the

0:16:21.640 --> 0:16:23.920
<v Speaker 7>UK it's it's kind of mixed. If you look at

0:16:24.320 --> 0:16:26.320
<v Speaker 7>if you look at some of the surveys, the business surveys,

0:16:26.320 --> 0:16:29.680
<v Speaker 7>they've been picking up people. Businesses seem more confident. You know,

0:16:29.800 --> 0:16:33.160
<v Speaker 7>there's there's strong profitability among or increasing profitability among small

0:16:33.200 --> 0:16:38.000
<v Speaker 7>businesses and households and businesses are both setting on huge

0:16:38.040 --> 0:16:41.600
<v Speaker 7>cash balances. But actually what's happening in the economy is

0:16:41.600 --> 0:16:44.440
<v Speaker 7>that you know, things things up there. Obviously labor market,

0:16:44.600 --> 0:16:48.400
<v Speaker 7>the employment has risen. There's been this these damaging tax

0:16:48.520 --> 0:16:51.400
<v Speaker 7>rises on business from the Chancellor which only came into

0:16:51.440 --> 0:16:55.640
<v Speaker 7>effect in April. Energy bills are still high and there's

0:16:55.800 --> 0:16:59.600
<v Speaker 7>genuine just just concerns about, you know, the policy outlook

0:16:59.600 --> 0:17:01.360
<v Speaker 7>and whether the more tax risers are going to be coming.

0:17:01.400 --> 0:17:03.840
<v Speaker 7>So you know, this is this is holding back the

0:17:03.880 --> 0:17:07.000
<v Speaker 7>animal spirits. But you can see like the potential for

0:17:07.600 --> 0:17:11.320
<v Speaker 7>a sort of a release of growth energy at some point.

0:17:11.440 --> 0:17:13.120
<v Speaker 7>It's just it's not quite happening yet.

0:17:13.600 --> 0:17:15.840
<v Speaker 3>The backdrop to this Dan of course also in recent

0:17:15.920 --> 0:17:18.640
<v Speaker 3>days is actually is like cooling in terms of economic growth,

0:17:18.640 --> 0:17:21.720
<v Speaker 3>at least on a monthly basis. Though, so again I

0:17:21.720 --> 0:17:24.920
<v Speaker 3>guess the state of the UK economy from your perspective.

0:17:25.200 --> 0:17:28.280
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I mean I broadly agree with what Phil said there.

0:17:28.359 --> 0:17:31.280
<v Speaker 8>I think we've had a we've had a cooling in activity.

0:17:31.320 --> 0:17:34.399
<v Speaker 8>It was pretty expect widely expected. The fall was a

0:17:34.440 --> 0:17:37.199
<v Speaker 8>bit sharper than people thought, but most people thought there

0:17:37.240 --> 0:17:38.679
<v Speaker 8>was going to be a fall in GDP. And it

0:17:38.720 --> 0:17:42.119
<v Speaker 8>relates to this idea that the first quarter of the

0:17:42.200 --> 0:17:46.199
<v Speaker 8>year was exceptionally strong, partly to do with what's been

0:17:46.200 --> 0:17:49.560
<v Speaker 8>going on with tariffs and firms front loading in anticipation

0:17:49.640 --> 0:17:55.280
<v Speaker 8>of tariffs. And I think the broad picture is consistent

0:17:55.400 --> 0:17:58.400
<v Speaker 8>with what the Bank of England set out in its

0:17:58.400 --> 0:18:01.000
<v Speaker 8>May forecast, which is you had this wrong, starts the year,

0:18:01.320 --> 0:18:03.280
<v Speaker 8>and then the remainder of the year is going to

0:18:03.280 --> 0:18:06.639
<v Speaker 8>be significantly weaker. So I think on the growth side,

0:18:06.880 --> 0:18:08.840
<v Speaker 8>there's nothing that's going to push them one way or

0:18:08.840 --> 0:18:12.680
<v Speaker 8>the other in terms of speeding up or slowing down

0:18:13.480 --> 0:18:16.520
<v Speaker 8>how fast they cut interest rates. I think that's the

0:18:16.560 --> 0:18:19.600
<v Speaker 8>bit of information that is new to them relative to

0:18:19.880 --> 0:18:23.000
<v Speaker 8>well relative to what they knew in May, is on

0:18:23.000 --> 0:18:25.080
<v Speaker 8>the labor market. And it does look like the labor

0:18:25.119 --> 0:18:28.399
<v Speaker 8>market has called faster than they were expecting. So, you know,

0:18:28.480 --> 0:18:31.080
<v Speaker 8>all else equal, that is a that is a dubbish signal,

0:18:31.119 --> 0:18:33.400
<v Speaker 8>and the markets have responded to that. They've moved from

0:18:33.440 --> 0:18:36.840
<v Speaker 8>pricing one and a bit cuts for the remainder of

0:18:36.880 --> 0:18:41.160
<v Speaker 8>the year to fully pricing two and it's quite possible,

0:18:41.200 --> 0:18:44.199
<v Speaker 8>you know that there's more more to come there. But

0:18:44.280 --> 0:18:47.080
<v Speaker 8>I think that's that's the news. Isn't going to be

0:18:47.160 --> 0:18:48.960
<v Speaker 8>enough to push them to cut interest rates in June? No,

0:18:49.040 --> 0:18:49.920
<v Speaker 8>I don't think it will.

0:18:50.600 --> 0:18:50.919
<v Speaker 2>Will it.

0:18:51.720 --> 0:18:53.800
<v Speaker 8>If the trend continues, I think it will give them

0:18:53.800 --> 0:18:56.920
<v Speaker 8>the confidence to carry on cutting. As Phil said, at

0:18:56.920 --> 0:18:59.120
<v Speaker 8>this quarterly pace over the remainder of the year.

0:18:59.359 --> 0:19:00.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:03.560
<v Speaker 3>I remember speaking to Petra tag from a Manpower UK,

0:19:03.640 --> 0:19:06.159
<v Speaker 3>which is the big recruitment firm on Blueberg Radio and

0:19:06.200 --> 0:19:09.760
<v Speaker 3>she was saying that there is a lot of nervousness

0:19:09.960 --> 0:19:12.560
<v Speaker 3>for employers at the moment, or that they are feeling

0:19:12.640 --> 0:19:18.280
<v Speaker 3>very nervous currently. Look, the other issue is the kind

0:19:18.280 --> 0:19:21.960
<v Speaker 3>of ramifications of Bailey's decision when it comes to Chance

0:19:22.040 --> 0:19:24.399
<v Speaker 3>of Rachel Reeves, who has also recently set out her

0:19:24.720 --> 0:19:28.639
<v Speaker 3>spending plans for effectively the rest of her term or

0:19:28.640 --> 0:19:31.480
<v Speaker 3>the rest of this kind of parliamentary term. And so

0:19:31.800 --> 0:19:35.520
<v Speaker 3>have a listening now to Chief EMEA Market strash is

0:19:35.640 --> 0:19:40.400
<v Speaker 3>Karen Ward at JP Morgan talking about actually the government's

0:19:40.440 --> 0:19:43.919
<v Speaker 3>debt bill and the possibilities and the difficulties that the

0:19:43.920 --> 0:19:45.439
<v Speaker 3>government has with that. Have a listen.

0:19:46.240 --> 0:19:49.120
<v Speaker 9>We have to get productivity going here in the UK.

0:19:49.240 --> 0:19:51.040
<v Speaker 9>I mean, if you look at the long term projections

0:19:51.040 --> 0:19:54.479
<v Speaker 9>the OBR do it. It's their lesser red report than

0:19:54.480 --> 0:19:57.800
<v Speaker 9>their sort of year ahead projections. But the trajectory over

0:19:57.840 --> 0:20:00.440
<v Speaker 9>the next fifty or so years for government and debt

0:20:00.520 --> 0:20:04.520
<v Speaker 9>is unpretty over two hundred and fifty percent. If a

0:20:04.640 --> 0:20:08.000
<v Speaker 9>rising productivity scenario, if there is not a recovery in

0:20:08.040 --> 0:20:10.800
<v Speaker 9>productivity that's headed more towards six hundred percent of GDP.

0:20:11.119 --> 0:20:13.600
<v Speaker 9>So we absolutely have to get growth going. We have

0:20:13.640 --> 0:20:17.000
<v Speaker 9>to get investment going. That's the reason we haven't got productivity.

0:20:17.160 --> 0:20:20.560
<v Speaker 9>Companies are not equipping their staff with better skills and

0:20:20.600 --> 0:20:23.360
<v Speaker 9>better equipment. And until we get that going, then we're

0:20:23.359 --> 0:20:26.320
<v Speaker 9>going to be in this perennial conversation about why there

0:20:26.320 --> 0:20:29.280
<v Speaker 9>isn't enough growth and why therefore we don't have money

0:20:29.320 --> 0:20:30.600
<v Speaker 9>to fund public services.

0:20:30.720 --> 0:20:33.320
<v Speaker 3>So that was JP Morgan's Karen Ward there who was

0:20:33.359 --> 0:20:37.000
<v Speaker 3>speaking to us in the last few days. Phil, what's

0:20:37.040 --> 0:20:42.400
<v Speaker 3>the link then between you know, the cost of boring

0:20:42.640 --> 0:20:45.640
<v Speaker 3>and the UK's debt issues. I mean Karen was talking

0:20:45.640 --> 0:20:49.600
<v Speaker 3>about it in very long term horizons, but but how

0:20:49.600 --> 0:20:50.840
<v Speaker 3>do you thread that needle?

0:20:51.640 --> 0:20:54.000
<v Speaker 7>Well, obviously, the faster the Bank of England brings down

0:20:54.480 --> 0:20:56.640
<v Speaker 7>interest rates, then the more that's going to send messages

0:20:56.640 --> 0:20:59.440
<v Speaker 7>through to the through the market and the whole curve

0:20:59.560 --> 0:21:03.560
<v Speaker 7>or potentially drop, and that will help the chancer because

0:21:03.600 --> 0:21:06.239
<v Speaker 7>their interest is one hundred and one hundred to one

0:21:06.280 --> 0:21:08.400
<v Speaker 7>hundred and ten billion pounds a year across the forecast,

0:21:08.400 --> 0:21:11.720
<v Speaker 7>which is you know virtually almost it is almost double

0:21:12.040 --> 0:21:16.320
<v Speaker 7>the defense budget. So you know that's that's an enormous cost,

0:21:16.600 --> 0:21:21.480
<v Speaker 7>so that that would help basically one of the problems actually,

0:21:21.520 --> 0:21:24.760
<v Speaker 7>I mean when the issues stems from Rachel Reeves's own

0:21:24.800 --> 0:21:28.240
<v Speaker 7>policies here, because she's it's these it's this tiny sliver

0:21:28.320 --> 0:21:31.639
<v Speaker 7>of headroom or the buffer against the fiscal rules that

0:21:31.720 --> 0:21:35.879
<v Speaker 7>she set herselves. Has just sort of embedded this uncertainty

0:21:35.920 --> 0:21:39.800
<v Speaker 7>about future policy into sort of the thinking of business

0:21:39.880 --> 0:21:43.080
<v Speaker 7>leaders and just generally into the economy because every time,

0:21:43.400 --> 0:21:45.560
<v Speaker 7>you know, there is a small shift in borrowing cost,

0:21:45.640 --> 0:21:48.119
<v Speaker 7>that can She's got ten billion of headroom and she

0:21:48.160 --> 0:21:51.360
<v Speaker 7>can lose all of that in just just minor movements

0:21:51.359 --> 0:21:52.480
<v Speaker 7>in the in the markets.

0:21:52.520 --> 0:21:54.560
<v Speaker 3>In terms of the vote split, what we should be

0:21:54.560 --> 0:21:57.120
<v Speaker 3>watching out for, in terms of the language I mean,

0:21:57.680 --> 0:22:00.560
<v Speaker 3>and the comparison obviously between the bank of it consisting

0:22:00.600 --> 0:22:03.280
<v Speaker 3>between the ECB and the Fed. What are we thinking

0:22:03.280 --> 0:22:04.439
<v Speaker 3>about in the next few days.

0:22:04.680 --> 0:22:07.240
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, So with so taking each of those in turns,

0:22:07.240 --> 0:22:10.040
<v Speaker 8>so with the vote split, I think you'll probably get

0:22:10.160 --> 0:22:13.920
<v Speaker 8>though the vote split has been very difficult to call,

0:22:14.359 --> 0:22:17.720
<v Speaker 8>and there have been a few volatile members of the

0:22:17.800 --> 0:22:20.480
<v Speaker 8>NPC in terms of their voting patterns, but as the

0:22:20.520 --> 0:22:22.600
<v Speaker 8>best guess I would say you would have a seven

0:22:22.680 --> 0:22:27.000
<v Speaker 8>to vote split, so you'd have Swatty Dingra and Alan

0:22:27.119 --> 0:22:30.600
<v Speaker 8>Taylor continuing to advocate more easing. I think there's a

0:22:30.680 --> 0:22:34.119
<v Speaker 8>risk that Sarah Breeden, who's one of the internal members,

0:22:35.560 --> 0:22:37.520
<v Speaker 8>votes for a rate cut, but I think a base case,

0:22:37.560 --> 0:22:39.880
<v Speaker 8>a reasonable base case is seven to two. I think

0:22:39.880 --> 0:22:40.640
<v Speaker 8>there's a question.

0:22:40.440 --> 0:22:43.800
<v Speaker 7>We're learning for cut and the rest learning to hot exactly.

0:22:43.920 --> 0:22:46.119
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, so we get we get a hold being interviewed

0:22:46.119 --> 0:22:51.159
<v Speaker 8>by two people now and there's a question mark I

0:22:51.200 --> 0:22:53.199
<v Speaker 8>think about whether that because so in May, both of

0:22:53.200 --> 0:22:55.840
<v Speaker 8>those members voted for a fifty basis point cut, so

0:22:56.080 --> 0:22:58.439
<v Speaker 8>there's a question mark. Do they go twenty five or

0:22:58.480 --> 0:23:01.400
<v Speaker 8>do they stick with fifty? You know, I think that

0:23:01.400 --> 0:23:04.639
<v Speaker 8>there's a question marked there. In terms of the guidance

0:23:05.720 --> 0:23:07.600
<v Speaker 8>going into the main meeting, there was a lot of

0:23:07.640 --> 0:23:10.560
<v Speaker 8>speculation that the bank would drop it. This commitment to

0:23:10.600 --> 0:23:13.880
<v Speaker 8>gradual and careful cuts, the worlding that Phil phil mentioned earlier.

0:23:14.840 --> 0:23:16.360
<v Speaker 8>I think they will stick with that that. I think

0:23:16.359 --> 0:23:20.680
<v Speaker 8>they're very comfortable with that because Fills also alluded to

0:23:20.720 --> 0:23:24.040
<v Speaker 8>the market perceives that as quarterly cuts, and I think

0:23:24.040 --> 0:23:26.000
<v Speaker 8>they're quite comfortable with quarterly cut, so I don't think

0:23:26.040 --> 0:23:29.240
<v Speaker 8>there's any reason for them to upset the apple cart

0:23:29.320 --> 0:23:32.960
<v Speaker 8>on that front. And then on where the bank sits,

0:23:32.960 --> 0:23:37.679
<v Speaker 8>between the FED and the ECB, the ECB inflations in

0:23:37.800 --> 0:23:40.120
<v Speaker 8>the EU area, inflation is sort of beaten. Yes, yeah,

0:23:40.160 --> 0:23:42.800
<v Speaker 8>and they've sort of, you know, close to declare victory.

0:23:43.040 --> 0:23:45.520
<v Speaker 8>They're basically now at a level they're very comfortable with.

0:23:45.640 --> 0:23:49.479
<v Speaker 8>They may do one more, that's our houseview. A lot

0:23:49.560 --> 0:23:51.960
<v Speaker 8>depends on what happens with tariffs, whether they go up

0:23:53.680 --> 0:23:57.480
<v Speaker 8>after this this ninety day pause, that will have a

0:23:57.480 --> 0:23:59.920
<v Speaker 8>big bearing on what's going on there. For the FED,

0:24:00.119 --> 0:24:05.320
<v Speaker 8>it's very difficult. The economy appears to just about beholding

0:24:05.400 --> 0:24:08.320
<v Speaker 8>up at the moment, but of course tariff's create a

0:24:08.359 --> 0:24:11.560
<v Speaker 8>trade off, creates higher inflation though we haven't seen it

0:24:11.600 --> 0:24:15.720
<v Speaker 8>yet in the data, and weaker growth, So there is

0:24:15.840 --> 0:24:18.320
<v Speaker 8>this there's a tough trade off. Whereas if you think

0:24:18.359 --> 0:24:21.240
<v Speaker 8>about tariffs in of themselves, for the ECB and the

0:24:21.240 --> 0:24:24.840
<v Speaker 8>Bank of England, I think most people majority I'm not

0:24:24.880 --> 0:24:28.080
<v Speaker 8>saying everyone, but most people would say they are not

0:24:28.200 --> 0:24:31.840
<v Speaker 8>growth friendly and disinflationary. So that's quite obvious. What you

0:24:31.840 --> 0:24:35.399
<v Speaker 8>do with interest rates against that backdrop, I think the

0:24:35.920 --> 0:24:39.399
<v Speaker 8>challenge for the bank is actually domestic and going to

0:24:39.440 --> 0:24:42.439
<v Speaker 8>what Phil said, this point about sticky inflation and the

0:24:42.480 --> 0:24:45.720
<v Speaker 8>point that I think in the UK inflation expectations are

0:24:46.520 --> 0:24:49.760
<v Speaker 8>probably inconsistent with target levels at the moment, and I

0:24:49.800 --> 0:24:53.000
<v Speaker 8>think the bank is worried about that. So the extent

0:24:53.040 --> 0:24:54.920
<v Speaker 8>to which they can look through this hump in inflation

0:24:55.960 --> 0:24:59.040
<v Speaker 8>is more limited than perhaps it was prior to the

0:24:59.040 --> 0:25:02.199
<v Speaker 8>big inflation shot. You know, remember Brexit, we had this

0:25:02.240 --> 0:25:04.840
<v Speaker 8>big increase in inflation, or a relatively large increase in inflation.

0:25:05.119 --> 0:25:08.240
<v Speaker 8>They eased policy despite of that. Same happened during the

0:25:08.240 --> 0:25:11.800
<v Speaker 8>financial crisis, So I think that the dynamics and the

0:25:11.840 --> 0:25:13.680
<v Speaker 8>trade off and the way they think about the trade

0:25:13.680 --> 0:25:14.760
<v Speaker 8>off has changed.

0:25:15.680 --> 0:25:18.880
<v Speaker 3>Okay, some interesting points. Thank you so much for giving

0:25:18.960 --> 0:25:21.240
<v Speaker 3>us a heads up on what to expect, of course,

0:25:21.280 --> 0:25:23.320
<v Speaker 3>on the Bank of England rate decision in the next

0:25:23.359 --> 0:25:26.119
<v Speaker 3>few days. That is Bloomberg's chief UK economist Dan Hanson

0:25:26.280 --> 0:25:28.879
<v Speaker 3>and our senior economics reporter Phil Aldrick. Thank you so

0:25:29.000 --> 0:25:31.760
<v Speaker 3>much for being with me. I'm Caroline Hepgar in London.

0:25:31.800 --> 0:25:34.639
<v Speaker 3>You can catch us every weekday morning for Bloomberg Daybreak.

0:25:34.640 --> 0:25:37.040
<v Speaker 3>You at beginning at six am in London. That's one

0:25:37.080 --> 0:25:38.159
<v Speaker 3>am on Wall Street.

0:25:38.240 --> 0:25:41.560
<v Speaker 2>Tom, Thank you Caroline. And coming up on Bloomberg day

0:25:41.560 --> 0:25:44.240
<v Speaker 2>Break weekend, we'll look ahead to a monetary policy decision

0:25:44.520 --> 0:25:47.480
<v Speaker 2>from the Bank of Japan. I'm Tom Busby and this

0:25:47.600 --> 0:26:01.360
<v Speaker 2>is Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg Break Weekend, our global look

0:26:01.359 --> 0:26:03.720
<v Speaker 2>ahead at the top stories for investors in the coming week.

0:26:03.960 --> 0:26:06.720
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tom Busby in New York. The Bank of Japan

0:26:06.800 --> 0:26:09.119
<v Speaker 2>is out with an interest rate decision this week, and

0:26:09.200 --> 0:26:11.439
<v Speaker 2>for more on what to expect, let's get to the

0:26:11.440 --> 0:26:14.840
<v Speaker 2>host of the Daybreak Asia podcast, Doug Krisner, for a.

0:26:14.800 --> 0:26:18.439
<v Speaker 4>Preview, Tom, These are interesting times for Bank of Japan

0:26:18.520 --> 0:26:22.040
<v Speaker 4>Governor Kazu o Uweeda. Core inflation in Japan has been

0:26:22.080 --> 0:26:25.639
<v Speaker 4>above the boj's target for nearly three years now, and

0:26:25.920 --> 0:26:28.720
<v Speaker 4>in that time there has been constant worry over the

0:26:28.800 --> 0:26:32.479
<v Speaker 4>durability of higher prices. In the last week, Governor Uwada

0:26:32.520 --> 0:26:36.040
<v Speaker 4>said the BOJ is still some distance from its inflation goal.

0:26:36.440 --> 0:26:39.840
<v Speaker 4>Perhaps the bigger worry these days has to do with trade.

0:26:40.320 --> 0:26:42.640
<v Speaker 4>Joining me now for a closer look is Paul Jackson.

0:26:42.680 --> 0:26:46.960
<v Speaker 4>He is Asia Economy editor for Bloomberg News in Tokyo. Paul,

0:26:47.000 --> 0:26:49.120
<v Speaker 4>thank you for making time to chat with me. It's

0:26:49.119 --> 0:26:51.720
<v Speaker 4>always a pleasure. So we have a BOJ meeting on

0:26:51.800 --> 0:26:54.800
<v Speaker 4>tap in the week ahead, and from what I'm reading, Paul,

0:26:54.880 --> 0:26:57.600
<v Speaker 4>the BOJ is likely to maintain this kind of weight

0:26:57.680 --> 0:27:00.359
<v Speaker 4>and see approach. That's kind of surprising when you look

0:27:00.359 --> 0:27:04.679
<v Speaker 4>at the forcefulness that we have seen in inflation in Japan.

0:27:04.800 --> 0:27:07.040
<v Speaker 4>Why are they adopting this wag and sy approach? Do

0:27:07.080 --> 0:27:07.480
<v Speaker 4>you think?

0:27:08.000 --> 0:27:11.960
<v Speaker 10>I think the answer is Donald Trump. I mean, we

0:27:12.040 --> 0:27:17.200
<v Speaker 10>have this wave of tariffs hitting the world. We still

0:27:17.240 --> 0:27:22.520
<v Speaker 10>don't have the final a view on what those levels

0:27:22.560 --> 0:27:26.439
<v Speaker 10>will be when this kind of temporary pause on the

0:27:26.440 --> 0:27:31.400
<v Speaker 10>reciprocal rates is lifted. We've seen a lot of kind

0:27:31.400 --> 0:27:36.120
<v Speaker 10>of conflicting reports about whether talks will continue or will

0:27:36.160 --> 0:27:38.879
<v Speaker 10>be wrapped up in the next couple of weeks. But

0:27:38.920 --> 0:27:40.640
<v Speaker 10>the long and the short of it is a bit

0:27:40.880 --> 0:27:45.240
<v Speaker 10>all this uncertainty. Would you want to be raising interest

0:27:45.320 --> 0:27:47.960
<v Speaker 10>rates aggressively even if you've got quite a bit of

0:27:48.000 --> 0:27:52.119
<v Speaker 10>inflation there? So I think it's the pause button is

0:27:52.160 --> 0:27:55.399
<v Speaker 10>going to be played next week. We've got economists and

0:27:55.400 --> 0:27:59.240
<v Speaker 10>analysts generally thinking that the Bank of Japan does face

0:28:00.280 --> 0:28:04.400
<v Speaker 10>a strong inflation trend here and it must act at

0:28:04.400 --> 0:28:07.840
<v Speaker 10>some point, but it's going to be later in the

0:28:07.920 --> 0:28:11.520
<v Speaker 10>year or even early next year. Of course, if we

0:28:11.560 --> 0:28:16.399
<v Speaker 10>do get clarity on tariffs and what the levels are

0:28:16.400 --> 0:28:19.399
<v Speaker 10>going to be for Japan going forward, then that could

0:28:19.480 --> 0:28:23.399
<v Speaker 10>change the thinking at the Central Bank, But for now,

0:28:23.840 --> 0:28:24.920
<v Speaker 10>rates on hold.

0:28:24.760 --> 0:28:27.119
<v Speaker 4>So the policy rate we know is just one tool.

0:28:27.160 --> 0:28:30.560
<v Speaker 4>The boj has also been very very forceful about trying

0:28:30.600 --> 0:28:33.640
<v Speaker 4>to manage the yield curve, and from what I understand,

0:28:33.960 --> 0:28:36.720
<v Speaker 4>the pace of tapering bond purchases is going to be

0:28:36.720 --> 0:28:38.520
<v Speaker 4>a hot topic at this meeting right.

0:28:38.520 --> 0:28:41.920
<v Speaker 10>Oh, yes, very much so. So as part of Governor

0:28:42.080 --> 0:28:47.520
<v Speaker 10>Uada's kind of drive to normalize policymaking at the Central

0:28:47.600 --> 0:28:50.680
<v Speaker 10>Bank and kind of help Japan to return to some

0:28:50.760 --> 0:28:54.760
<v Speaker 10>kind of normal status as a G seven economy rather

0:28:54.800 --> 0:28:59.280
<v Speaker 10>than an experimental outlier. He's been looking to pull back

0:28:59.320 --> 0:29:03.560
<v Speaker 10>from all the market interventions that the central Bank had

0:29:03.680 --> 0:29:06.120
<v Speaker 10>gotten into, and one of them is that is the

0:29:06.120 --> 0:29:09.480
<v Speaker 10>bond buying, and the Bank of Japan was buying incredible

0:29:09.560 --> 0:29:14.160
<v Speaker 10>amounts of bonds. Even now it holds around half of

0:29:14.200 --> 0:29:19.200
<v Speaker 10>all the outstanding Japanese central government debt, and it's wanting

0:29:19.240 --> 0:29:22.640
<v Speaker 10>to kind of like remove its status as a whale

0:29:22.640 --> 0:29:26.040
<v Speaker 10>in the pond and let market forces kind of take

0:29:26.080 --> 0:29:29.920
<v Speaker 10>over price setting in the market. Now, that all sounds great,

0:29:30.480 --> 0:29:35.080
<v Speaker 10>but how quickly can you actually do that without triggering

0:29:35.200 --> 0:29:38.920
<v Speaker 10>a lot of volatility in prices? And I think what's

0:29:38.960 --> 0:29:42.800
<v Speaker 10>happened amongst all the uncertainties going around in the world

0:29:43.320 --> 0:29:46.040
<v Speaker 10>the pace at which the Bank of Japan has been

0:29:46.400 --> 0:29:49.560
<v Speaker 10>cutting back its purchases. So it's still buying a lot,

0:29:50.000 --> 0:29:53.520
<v Speaker 10>but it's buying less with each quarter that it's maybe

0:29:53.600 --> 0:29:57.080
<v Speaker 10>going a bit too fast, and there's concerns about what

0:29:57.160 --> 0:29:58.640
<v Speaker 10>happens from this point forward.

0:29:58.760 --> 0:30:02.040
<v Speaker 4>So our policymakers keeping a very close eye on the

0:30:02.080 --> 0:30:06.080
<v Speaker 4>currency right now, particularly the yen's relationship with the dollar,

0:30:06.200 --> 0:30:09.320
<v Speaker 4>at a time when people in the States are expecting

0:30:09.480 --> 0:30:11.960
<v Speaker 4>the Fed to lower rates sometime before the end of

0:30:11.960 --> 0:30:13.800
<v Speaker 4>the year, maybe we get two rate cuts and that

0:30:13.840 --> 0:30:16.400
<v Speaker 4>would be dollar negative. So talk to me a little

0:30:16.400 --> 0:30:20.320
<v Speaker 4>bit about how policymakers in Japan right now are viewing

0:30:20.600 --> 0:30:22.960
<v Speaker 4>the end, which has been a little choppy lately.

0:30:23.280 --> 0:30:23.560
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:30:23.600 --> 0:30:27.240
<v Speaker 10>Absolutely, I mean, I think they're quite happy for a

0:30:27.240 --> 0:30:30.760
<v Speaker 10>bit of strength to come into the end, take it

0:30:30.840 --> 0:30:34.280
<v Speaker 10>well away from those levels that cause so much trouble

0:30:34.400 --> 0:30:39.280
<v Speaker 10>in recent years, and so much money spent on intervention.

0:30:39.760 --> 0:30:44.280
<v Speaker 10>So I don't think the moment that's like the key

0:30:45.440 --> 0:30:48.400
<v Speaker 10>hot topic concern for the central bank at this time

0:30:48.960 --> 0:30:54.080
<v Speaker 10>or the policy makers, really. I think the key point

0:30:54.160 --> 0:30:59.160
<v Speaker 10>here is what kind of deal can Japan cut with

0:30:59.360 --> 0:31:02.720
<v Speaker 10>the US on these trade tariffs. I mean, some of

0:31:02.760 --> 0:31:07.960
<v Speaker 10>these tariffs are really hitting key industries in Japan, you know,

0:31:08.000 --> 0:31:12.800
<v Speaker 10>regardless of the exchange rate. Obviously it's an important aspect

0:31:12.840 --> 0:31:15.360
<v Speaker 10>of it. But in terms of these tariffs, I mean

0:31:15.600 --> 0:31:21.280
<v Speaker 10>twenty five percent on Japan's auto sector, that's a huge

0:31:21.320 --> 0:31:26.120
<v Speaker 10>shadow hanging over Japan's economy going forward. That's around ten

0:31:26.160 --> 0:31:31.000
<v Speaker 10>percent of GDP, eight percent of the workforce employed by

0:31:31.120 --> 0:31:35.640
<v Speaker 10>the auto sector. You know, can they withstand that kind

0:31:35.640 --> 0:31:36.280
<v Speaker 10>of pressure.

0:31:36.560 --> 0:31:38.840
<v Speaker 4>So we were talking a moment ago about the inflation

0:31:39.160 --> 0:31:42.080
<v Speaker 4>environment in Japan, and I'm wondering whether the government is

0:31:42.120 --> 0:31:46.720
<v Speaker 4>still considering cash handouts as a way to help consumers

0:31:47.120 --> 0:31:50.040
<v Speaker 4>deal with this sticky domestic inflation story.

0:31:50.400 --> 0:31:53.560
<v Speaker 10>You know, this is a very good point because if

0:31:53.560 --> 0:31:56.920
<v Speaker 10>the central bank can't aggressively raise interest rates, that means

0:31:56.960 --> 0:32:00.479
<v Speaker 10>you're going to have inflation kicking around for long and

0:32:00.680 --> 0:32:04.360
<v Speaker 10>voters are are sick of hit. They want something to

0:32:04.400 --> 0:32:08.360
<v Speaker 10>be done. There have been subsidy measures for electricity bills

0:32:08.360 --> 0:32:12.920
<v Speaker 10>and gas bills and stuff over recent years, but they're

0:32:12.920 --> 0:32:16.680
<v Speaker 10>wanting more. And as you've got increasing tax revenue, people

0:32:16.720 --> 0:32:18.479
<v Speaker 10>are thinking, you know what's going on. You're getting all

0:32:18.520 --> 0:32:23.000
<v Speaker 10>this extra tax money and we've still got a high

0:32:23.360 --> 0:32:27.320
<v Speaker 10>levels of taxation. From a consumer's perspective, they're thinking, why

0:32:27.400 --> 0:32:31.000
<v Speaker 10>don't you lower the sales tax on a temporary basis,

0:32:31.320 --> 0:32:35.320
<v Speaker 10>give us some relief while this inflation trend is continuing.

0:32:35.520 --> 0:32:38.720
<v Speaker 10>And we've got a national election for the upper House

0:32:39.200 --> 0:32:41.880
<v Speaker 10>coming next month, and I think this is going to

0:32:41.880 --> 0:32:43.840
<v Speaker 10>be a key point with a lot of the opposition

0:32:44.040 --> 0:32:49.160
<v Speaker 10>parties saying, hey, look, lower the sales tax, give consumers

0:32:49.200 --> 0:32:53.640
<v Speaker 10>a break. For the central government that is problematic. You've

0:32:53.640 --> 0:32:57.720
<v Speaker 10>got debt that's more twice the size of the economy.

0:32:58.000 --> 0:33:01.720
<v Speaker 10>You've got this volatility in the long term super long

0:33:01.960 --> 0:33:07.280
<v Speaker 10>end of the bond market. Are you wanted to, you know,

0:33:08.160 --> 0:33:12.360
<v Speaker 10>pay your way with extra spending through more debt issuance? No,

0:33:12.440 --> 0:33:14.600
<v Speaker 10>you don't, So they're gonna have to come up with

0:33:14.640 --> 0:33:15.400
<v Speaker 10>some other measures.

0:33:15.640 --> 0:33:18.720
<v Speaker 4>Let's talk about Prime Minister Ishiba's meeting in the coming

0:33:18.760 --> 0:33:21.800
<v Speaker 4>week with President Trump that will happen on the sidelines

0:33:22.040 --> 0:33:23.880
<v Speaker 4>of the G seven in Canada.

0:33:24.000 --> 0:33:26.920
<v Speaker 10>What are we expecting, Well, first of all, you know

0:33:27.000 --> 0:33:29.760
<v Speaker 10>these meetings, you know, nothing's kind of set in stone.

0:33:30.440 --> 0:33:32.880
<v Speaker 10>If they don't meet, I think that would be a

0:33:32.960 --> 0:33:37.120
<v Speaker 10>setback for Ishuba. I think we're seeing a lot of

0:33:37.240 --> 0:33:42.080
<v Speaker 10>momentum going forward. This is we have negotiators. Japan's top

0:33:42.120 --> 0:33:47.080
<v Speaker 10>trade negotiator is on his sixth visit to DC this

0:33:47.080 --> 0:33:50.000
<v Speaker 10>this week to try and get closer to the line

0:33:50.440 --> 0:33:54.040
<v Speaker 10>on some kind of trade deal. I think that the

0:33:54.080 --> 0:33:57.720
<v Speaker 10>two leaders probably will meet and they probably will have

0:33:57.880 --> 0:34:00.800
<v Speaker 10>some kind of statement. Now, whether it's it's a deal

0:34:01.160 --> 0:34:05.160
<v Speaker 10>perhaps with nothing much fleshed out, but you know, grand

0:34:05.160 --> 0:34:08.719
<v Speaker 10>statements about we've done it, we've reached the deal, or

0:34:08.800 --> 0:34:12.160
<v Speaker 10>whether it's just a statement saying significant progress has been

0:34:12.160 --> 0:34:16.040
<v Speaker 10>made in trade talks. I think there probably will be

0:34:16.360 --> 0:34:18.000
<v Speaker 10>some kind of joint statement.

0:34:18.200 --> 0:34:20.680
<v Speaker 4>So you were talking a moment ago about the tariff

0:34:20.719 --> 0:34:24.120
<v Speaker 4>story as it relates to the automobile industry in Japan,

0:34:24.160 --> 0:34:28.680
<v Speaker 4>which as we both know, is enormous. Let's not forget steel, right,

0:34:28.719 --> 0:34:31.520
<v Speaker 4>and we have those steel tariffs in place, and in

0:34:31.560 --> 0:34:35.200
<v Speaker 4>the last week, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnik was saying that

0:34:35.239 --> 0:34:38.520
<v Speaker 4>the deal between Nippon Steel and US Steel will be

0:34:38.640 --> 0:34:42.319
<v Speaker 4>done reasonably soon. Do you have a sense of what

0:34:42.480 --> 0:34:45.600
<v Speaker 4>this possibly may entail, what it could look like.

0:34:46.080 --> 0:34:48.960
<v Speaker 10>Well, I think there's been all all manner of question

0:34:49.080 --> 0:34:52.799
<v Speaker 10>marks about what this is and how much investment is

0:34:52.880 --> 0:34:57.280
<v Speaker 10>going to the US. The investment figure looked very similar

0:34:57.600 --> 0:35:01.799
<v Speaker 10>to the buyout figure. What we do see is, you know,

0:35:01.800 --> 0:35:06.040
<v Speaker 10>we've got this kind of golden share arrangement for the

0:35:06.160 --> 0:35:10.879
<v Speaker 10>US government essentially to have a veto on key decisions.

0:35:11.680 --> 0:35:15.040
<v Speaker 10>So this is something that Donald Trump is putting forward

0:35:15.080 --> 0:35:18.759
<v Speaker 10>as a great success for his administration. No matter how

0:35:18.880 --> 0:35:22.279
<v Speaker 10>much it looks like something close to a biout, I

0:35:22.320 --> 0:35:26.120
<v Speaker 10>think there are key provisos that have given the optics

0:35:26.120 --> 0:35:29.160
<v Speaker 10>a much better look for the US administration.

0:35:29.680 --> 0:35:32.399
<v Speaker 4>So, if Prime Minister Ishibai he is really trying to

0:35:32.440 --> 0:35:35.239
<v Speaker 4>strike a favorable trade deal with the US right now,

0:35:35.360 --> 0:35:38.279
<v Speaker 4>is it in his best interest not to get too

0:35:38.360 --> 0:35:42.360
<v Speaker 4>involved with the China side of Japanese trade and perhaps

0:35:42.640 --> 0:35:45.000
<v Speaker 4>put that off for the moment and focus more on

0:35:45.040 --> 0:35:46.480
<v Speaker 4>the relationship with Washington.

0:35:46.719 --> 0:35:49.080
<v Speaker 10>I think for Ishiba at the moment, it's got to

0:35:49.160 --> 0:35:53.680
<v Speaker 10>all be about the relationship with the US now. Of course,

0:35:53.719 --> 0:35:58.480
<v Speaker 10>for all the players in Asia, threading treading the difficult

0:35:58.520 --> 0:36:02.920
<v Speaker 10>path between how much you deal with these huge trading partners,

0:36:03.360 --> 0:36:08.000
<v Speaker 10>the United States and China is a real head scratcher.

0:36:08.400 --> 0:36:11.520
<v Speaker 10>You look at South Korea for example, I mean, you

0:36:11.520 --> 0:36:15.799
<v Speaker 10>know that reliant on both economiest heavily. You know, how

0:36:15.840 --> 0:36:20.239
<v Speaker 10>do they navigate that. Japan's in a similar position. But

0:36:20.320 --> 0:36:23.919
<v Speaker 10>I think at the moment that the big scary thing

0:36:24.640 --> 0:36:28.160
<v Speaker 10>standing in front of you is this wave of tariffs

0:36:28.200 --> 0:36:32.600
<v Speaker 10>and how you tran get concessions on that topic.

0:36:32.719 --> 0:36:35.319
<v Speaker 4>We were talking a moment ago about the potential for

0:36:35.480 --> 0:36:38.920
<v Speaker 4>cash handouts to consumers in Japan. We've got an election

0:36:39.320 --> 0:36:42.640
<v Speaker 4>just around the corner, and I'm wondering how people are

0:36:42.680 --> 0:36:44.920
<v Speaker 4>feeling right now about the ishi A government.

0:36:45.200 --> 0:36:48.080
<v Speaker 10>Well, he's got some shoring up to do of support.

0:36:48.600 --> 0:36:53.120
<v Speaker 10>He's had this minority government. He's been kind of, you know,

0:36:54.280 --> 0:36:59.439
<v Speaker 10>walking a very difficult tight rope since that election last

0:36:59.520 --> 0:37:04.920
<v Speaker 10>year where the general election where the results lost stripped

0:37:04.960 --> 0:37:08.680
<v Speaker 10>him of a majority in parliament. He's been having to

0:37:08.719 --> 0:37:15.160
<v Speaker 10>cooperate with the opposition parties to get legislation over the line.

0:37:15.520 --> 0:37:19.440
<v Speaker 10>So he's really in need of at least a better

0:37:19.640 --> 0:37:23.799
<v Speaker 10>outcome than he had last autumn in this election, and

0:37:23.960 --> 0:37:28.400
<v Speaker 10>this inflation dynamic that we've been talking about is you know,

0:37:29.719 --> 0:37:33.160
<v Speaker 10>acting against him in his face. We've also seen a

0:37:33.200 --> 0:37:37.520
<v Speaker 10>hot topic of the rice prices. Rice prices have pretty

0:37:37.560 --> 0:37:42.880
<v Speaker 10>much doubled in recent months, and for consumers this has

0:37:43.000 --> 0:37:48.799
<v Speaker 10>really been like your staple for meals every day is

0:37:48.880 --> 0:37:53.120
<v Speaker 10>twice the price. Are you kidding, mister Ishuiba. We want

0:37:53.160 --> 0:37:55.520
<v Speaker 10>to vote for you, Are you sure? So he's got

0:37:55.520 --> 0:37:59.760
<v Speaker 10>a somehow in the intervening month before that election convinced

0:37:59.800 --> 0:38:03.920
<v Speaker 10>vote is that they are getting assistance from the government.

0:38:04.239 --> 0:38:07.200
<v Speaker 10>The government does have a plan for growth. I've how

0:38:07.280 --> 0:38:10.759
<v Speaker 10>to deal with Donald Trump and they will bring rice

0:38:10.880 --> 0:38:11.680
<v Speaker 10>prices down.

0:38:11.880 --> 0:38:13.879
<v Speaker 4>We'll leave it there, Paul, it's always a pleasure. Thank

0:38:13.920 --> 0:38:15.640
<v Speaker 4>you so much for taking the time to help us

0:38:15.719 --> 0:38:18.280
<v Speaker 4>understand the macro view of what's going on in Japan

0:38:18.320 --> 0:38:20.640
<v Speaker 4>as we look ahead to this meeting in the coming

0:38:20.640 --> 0:38:23.719
<v Speaker 4>week of the Bank of Japan. He's Paul Jackson, Bloomberg

0:38:23.760 --> 0:38:27.520
<v Speaker 4>Asia Economy Editor joining us from Tokyo, and I'm Doug Christner.

0:38:27.560 --> 0:38:30.960
<v Speaker 4>You can catch us weekdays for the Daybreak Asia podcast.

0:38:31.320 --> 0:38:35.319
<v Speaker 4>It's available wherever you get your podcast. Tom, thank you Doug.

0:38:35.520 --> 0:38:37.560
<v Speaker 2>And that does it for this edition of Bloomberg day

0:38:37.600 --> 0:38:40.200
<v Speaker 2>Break Weekend. Join us again Monday morning at five am

0:38:40.239 --> 0:38:42.719
<v Speaker 2>Wall Street Time for the latest on markets overseas and

0:38:42.760 --> 0:38:45.920
<v Speaker 2>the news you need to start your day. I'm Tom Busby.

0:38:46.200 --> 0:38:48.799
<v Speaker 2>Stay with us. Top stories in global business. Headlines are

0:38:48.840 --> 0:38:51.040
<v Speaker 2>coming up right now