WEBVTT - CLASSIC: The Smiley Face Murder Conspiracy

0:00:00.600 --> 0:00:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Fellow conspiracy realist friends and neighbors. Tonight's classic episode may

0:00:05.480 --> 0:00:09.639
<v Speaker 1>not be appropriate for all listeners. The headline simply put,

0:00:09.880 --> 0:00:13.880
<v Speaker 1>could a group of serial murderers be kidnapping and drowning

0:00:14.040 --> 0:00:17.040
<v Speaker 1>young men across the entirety of the United States?

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:20.959
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? I remembering like pools were involved in this one.

0:00:21.079 --> 0:00:24.320
<v Speaker 2>Bodies of water, for sure, went the pools. There weren't pools.

0:00:24.800 --> 0:00:27.280
<v Speaker 3>I think it's more lakes rivers.

0:00:27.400 --> 0:00:30.479
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I just remember I remember a graffiti situation, like

0:00:30.520 --> 0:00:33.880
<v Speaker 2>where they were tagging this smiley face and from my mind,

0:00:33.920 --> 0:00:36.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm picturing one in like a drained pool that I

0:00:36.040 --> 0:00:38.280
<v Speaker 2>could be maybe it was like a canal or something.

0:00:38.800 --> 0:00:39.839
<v Speaker 2>I think it was a canal.

0:00:42.760 --> 0:00:46.199
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we kept talking about this specific episode while we

0:00:46.200 --> 0:00:47.080
<v Speaker 3>were making that one.

0:00:47.240 --> 0:00:49.680
<v Speaker 2>That's right, that's right. There are parallels. And this is

0:00:49.680 --> 0:00:52.120
<v Speaker 2>not to be confused with The Happy Face Killer, a

0:00:52.200 --> 0:00:53.920
<v Speaker 2>series that both Ben and I worked on, which is

0:00:53.960 --> 0:00:57.040
<v Speaker 2>also good and now a TV show weirdly on Lincoln

0:00:57.040 --> 0:00:57.880
<v Speaker 2>Peacock or something.

0:00:58.400 --> 0:01:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, this is instead, and I appreciate that point because

0:01:02.240 --> 0:01:05.120
<v Speaker 1>it's easy to confuse the two. This is the Smiley

0:01:05.200 --> 0:01:10.959
<v Speaker 1>Face Murder conspiracy. The idea that these what appear to

0:01:11.000 --> 0:01:17.119
<v Speaker 1>be accidental drownings do perhaps to implement weather, simple bad luck,

0:01:17.200 --> 0:01:23.080
<v Speaker 1>or perhaps intoxication, or instead the result of an active

0:01:23.319 --> 0:01:28.000
<v Speaker 1>group of straight up maniacs. And for the people who

0:01:28.000 --> 0:01:32.040
<v Speaker 1>believe in this theory, retired detectives among them. The giveaway

0:01:32.200 --> 0:01:36.759
<v Speaker 1>is that there is always some kind of trademark graffiti

0:01:36.920 --> 0:01:41.720
<v Speaker 1>of a smiley face. And I don't know, man, this

0:01:41.920 --> 0:01:43.080
<v Speaker 1>is deep stuff.

0:01:43.720 --> 0:01:45.800
<v Speaker 2>And guys, I'm having a hard time remembering how this

0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:48.880
<v Speaker 2>one results. I feel like there was a twist we'll

0:01:48.920 --> 0:01:51.120
<v Speaker 2>find out shortly. Here we go.

0:01:52.120 --> 0:01:56.560
<v Speaker 4>From UFOs to psychic powers and government conspiracies. History is

0:01:56.680 --> 0:02:00.960
<v Speaker 4>riddled with unexplained events. You can turn back now or

0:02:01.040 --> 0:02:02.760
<v Speaker 4>learn this stuff they don't want.

0:02:02.560 --> 0:02:03.000
<v Speaker 2>You to know.

0:02:03.960 --> 0:02:07.160
<v Speaker 4>A production of iHeart Radios How Stuff Works.

0:02:16.120 --> 0:02:18.320
<v Speaker 3>Welcome back to the show. My name is Matt, my.

0:02:18.480 --> 0:02:20.160
<v Speaker 2>Name is Noman. They call me Ben.

0:02:20.200 --> 0:02:22.880
<v Speaker 1>We are joined as always with our super producer Paul.

0:02:23.000 --> 0:02:27.239
<v Speaker 1>Mission control decands, most importantly, you are you. You are here,

0:02:27.400 --> 0:02:30.640
<v Speaker 1>and that makes this stuff they don't want you to know.

0:02:31.400 --> 0:02:35.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to start out with something very very honest,

0:02:35.360 --> 0:02:38.960
<v Speaker 1>and it's one of the great commonalities.

0:02:38.280 --> 0:02:40.520
<v Speaker 2>Of our species is this.

0:02:41.560 --> 0:02:45.960
<v Speaker 1>People die, whether due to accident, injury, disease, or crime.

0:02:46.320 --> 0:02:48.680
<v Speaker 1>The unexpected loss of a loved one is one of

0:02:48.680 --> 0:02:53.280
<v Speaker 1>the most harrowing events in human experience. It doesn't matter

0:02:53.360 --> 0:02:56.960
<v Speaker 1>who you are, prince, a popper. We love people, and

0:02:57.639 --> 0:03:01.840
<v Speaker 1>at some point they or we are gone. And when

0:03:02.480 --> 0:03:05.480
<v Speaker 1>people are struggling in the wake of these these terrible,

0:03:05.480 --> 0:03:10.720
<v Speaker 1>indescribable tragedies, we often find ourselves desperately searching for answers.

0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:14.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, questions haunt us. Was there something I could

0:03:14.360 --> 0:03:17.040
<v Speaker 1>have done differently? We might ask, Or out of all

0:03:17.080 --> 0:03:19.360
<v Speaker 1>of the billions of people in the world, why was

0:03:19.440 --> 0:03:21.840
<v Speaker 1>my child, my partner, my parent, or my friend the

0:03:21.840 --> 0:03:28.160
<v Speaker 1>one to pass away? And this intense pain worsens when

0:03:28.400 --> 0:03:32.840
<v Speaker 1>survivors are left with missing pieces to their stories. You know,

0:03:32.880 --> 0:03:37.480
<v Speaker 1>we always hear about We always hear about legal proceedings

0:03:37.840 --> 0:03:40.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe for a disappearance or a crime or murder, that

0:03:41.520 --> 0:03:44.600
<v Speaker 1>go on for years or decades after the event. And

0:03:44.880 --> 0:03:49.520
<v Speaker 1>in many ways it's driven by surviving family members or

0:03:49.560 --> 0:03:54.320
<v Speaker 1>loved ones, not because they believe this will somehow, you know,

0:03:54.400 --> 0:04:01.680
<v Speaker 1>bring someone back. It's because the experience of closure is

0:04:01.880 --> 0:04:05.760
<v Speaker 1>so much better than the experience of wondering what happened

0:04:06.160 --> 0:04:08.760
<v Speaker 1>to a child, or a spouse or a loved one.

0:04:09.280 --> 0:04:12.880
<v Speaker 1>But then there's this other chilling situation, which is, what

0:04:13.040 --> 0:04:16.359
<v Speaker 1>do you do when authorities have ruled the death of

0:04:16.360 --> 0:04:20.080
<v Speaker 1>a loved one accidental, but you feel they got it wrong.

0:04:20.600 --> 0:04:23.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we've seen examples of that, and we know

0:04:23.520 --> 0:04:25.839
<v Speaker 1>at least we can't speak for every country, but we

0:04:25.920 --> 0:04:29.120
<v Speaker 1>know that here in the US there is a clear

0:04:29.200 --> 0:04:35.240
<v Speaker 1>and systemic problem with things being with causes of death

0:04:35.279 --> 0:04:41.080
<v Speaker 1>being misidentified right or with some kind of malfunction in

0:04:41.120 --> 0:04:44.840
<v Speaker 1>the justice system leading to the wrong person being convicted

0:04:44.880 --> 0:04:48.120
<v Speaker 1>of a crime. The real criminal walks away and they

0:04:48.120 --> 0:04:52.320
<v Speaker 1>get caught, you know, four assaults, five murders later.

0:04:52.960 --> 0:04:55.479
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Well, we also know there are real problems within

0:04:55.560 --> 0:05:01.279
<v Speaker 3>institutions where sometimes in This is certainly not true of

0:05:01.320 --> 0:05:03.960
<v Speaker 3>all cases, and this is certainly not speaking ill of

0:05:04.000 --> 0:05:06.840
<v Speaker 3>any individual out there who may be listening or who

0:05:06.880 --> 0:05:09.760
<v Speaker 3>is working in any of these fields. But sometimes it

0:05:09.800 --> 0:05:14.240
<v Speaker 3>is more beneficial to have a let's say, a case

0:05:15.000 --> 0:05:18.760
<v Speaker 3>be classified one way rather than the other. That will

0:05:18.760 --> 0:05:21.600
<v Speaker 3>prevent a major investigation from occurring, because.

0:05:21.360 --> 0:05:23.640
<v Speaker 2>As far as the authorities are concerned, that closes the

0:05:23.640 --> 0:05:27.719
<v Speaker 2>book on it. They can devote resources elsewhere and we

0:05:27.760 --> 0:05:30.239
<v Speaker 2>all know that law enforcement agencies are often quite strapped

0:05:30.240 --> 0:05:33.320
<v Speaker 2>for resources, and every agency is every agent.

0:05:33.400 --> 0:05:35.920
<v Speaker 3>We all human beings out here are trying to do

0:05:35.960 --> 0:05:38.320
<v Speaker 3>the best we can with what we have, right, I mean,

0:05:38.360 --> 0:05:41.760
<v Speaker 3>I think that speaks to most of us, especially you listening,

0:05:41.800 --> 0:05:46.440
<v Speaker 3>because you're awesome, who are Yeah? Well, I mean, it's

0:05:46.520 --> 0:05:50.279
<v Speaker 3>just the nature of large systems like that. Sometimes you

0:05:50.360 --> 0:05:54.240
<v Speaker 3>have to you have to at least attempt to make

0:05:54.279 --> 0:05:56.840
<v Speaker 3>it function at its highest level. And to do that,

0:05:57.000 --> 0:05:59.920
<v Speaker 3>you have to pick and choose, basically what priorities.

0:06:00.240 --> 0:06:02.960
<v Speaker 2>And by its very nature, I'm not saying it's inherently callous,

0:06:03.040 --> 0:06:04.479
<v Speaker 2>but it has to take a little bit more of

0:06:04.480 --> 0:06:08.279
<v Speaker 2>a clinical approach to these things then would be taken

0:06:08.400 --> 0:06:10.520
<v Speaker 2>on the family side, which is obviously a much more

0:06:10.520 --> 0:06:13.960
<v Speaker 2>personal and emotional approach to this idea of closure. So

0:06:14.000 --> 0:06:16.240
<v Speaker 2>while the book might be closed on a case as

0:06:16.240 --> 0:06:19.000
<v Speaker 2>far as law enforcement is concerned, that would be far

0:06:19.040 --> 0:06:21.560
<v Speaker 2>from the case if a family member thinks they got

0:06:21.560 --> 0:06:22.760
<v Speaker 2>something a little off.

0:06:23.080 --> 0:06:25.919
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And all of this doesn't change the way those

0:06:25.920 --> 0:06:29.320
<v Speaker 3>family members or those loved ones feel in what they believe.

0:06:29.800 --> 0:06:32.720
<v Speaker 3>None of this, none of the realities change the way

0:06:32.839 --> 0:06:34.520
<v Speaker 3>that experience at that level.

0:06:34.760 --> 0:06:34.960
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:06:36.000 --> 0:06:40.320
<v Speaker 1>We can all think of specific cases where the where

0:06:40.360 --> 0:06:44.200
<v Speaker 1>in law enforcement, municipal, maybe even on federal level, said Okay,

0:06:44.240 --> 0:06:46.400
<v Speaker 1>we've figured out what happened is what happened, and the

0:06:46.440 --> 0:06:50.840
<v Speaker 1>family says, no, this is not a satisfactory explanation. As

0:06:50.880 --> 0:06:53.080
<v Speaker 1>a matter of fact, in the past, we've covered many

0:06:53.279 --> 0:06:58.880
<v Speaker 1>examples of this, often with journalists who found something they

0:06:58.880 --> 0:07:02.640
<v Speaker 1>don't want you to know and then later somehow died

0:07:03.040 --> 0:07:06.080
<v Speaker 1>and before we go on. You know, this reminds me.

0:07:06.320 --> 0:07:09.440
<v Speaker 1>I recently rewatched some clips of one of your favorite shows, Matt,

0:07:09.480 --> 0:07:09.960
<v Speaker 1>The Wire.

0:07:10.680 --> 0:07:13.800
<v Speaker 2>I believe it is. That is everybody's favorite show, right.

0:07:14.160 --> 0:07:18.840
<v Speaker 1>One of the best shows. Then right, backstory, Matt introduced

0:07:18.880 --> 0:07:19.440
<v Speaker 1>me to The Wire.

0:07:19.600 --> 0:07:22.920
<v Speaker 3>So we would not have Luther if we didn't have

0:07:22.960 --> 0:07:26.040
<v Speaker 3>The Wire. Okay, that's also true, that's all.

0:07:26.240 --> 0:07:29.960
<v Speaker 2>That's all. We also wouldn't have Macavity in the latest

0:07:30.000 --> 0:07:35.680
<v Speaker 2>iteration of Cats, which is a thing of monstrosity and beauty,

0:07:35.720 --> 0:07:38.160
<v Speaker 2>and then everyone should experience it for themselves, just putting

0:07:38.160 --> 0:07:38.400
<v Speaker 2>that out.

0:07:38.480 --> 0:07:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I saw it too, it and I think it

0:07:40.720 --> 0:07:43.520
<v Speaker 1>is the true spiritual successor to the Wire.

0:07:43.640 --> 0:07:46.720
<v Speaker 2>It's basically the last season of The Wire. Stringer Bell

0:07:46.840 --> 0:07:53.040
<v Speaker 2>pirouetting around in a weird anthropomorphic CGI cat suit with

0:07:53.160 --> 0:07:55.640
<v Speaker 2>ripped abs yep, yep.

0:07:55.840 --> 0:07:59.120
<v Speaker 1>In the before the Cat season of The Wire, you

0:07:59.120 --> 0:08:03.760
<v Speaker 1>guys will recall there was a there was an ongoing

0:08:03.800 --> 0:08:06.320
<v Speaker 1>plot and I think maybe season four.

0:08:06.480 --> 0:08:09.000
<v Speaker 2>Slight spoiler alert, you mean with the vacance where there

0:08:09.000 --> 0:08:12.000
<v Speaker 2>were bodies that were just kind of disappearing, and I

0:08:12.040 --> 0:08:16.360
<v Speaker 2>think they're the newspaper essentially created a narrative of their

0:08:16.400 --> 0:08:17.320
<v Speaker 2>own to explain this.

0:08:17.840 --> 0:08:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Yes, yes, full spoiler alert. Now McNulty is.

0:08:21.120 --> 0:08:28.600
<v Speaker 5>Involved using bodies, yeah, yeah, yeah, and is creating essentially

0:08:28.800 --> 0:08:31.560
<v Speaker 5>or or working with this narrative, right, the idea of

0:08:31.640 --> 0:08:35.280
<v Speaker 5>creating a sort of false narrative to get some more

0:08:35.320 --> 0:08:38.520
<v Speaker 5>resources put into solving some of these murders right right.

0:08:38.480 --> 0:08:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Right now that I think about it, I believe was

0:08:40.000 --> 0:08:44.360
<v Speaker 1>season five, McNulty, one of the main characters full spoiler alert,

0:08:44.800 --> 0:08:49.360
<v Speaker 1>creates a serial killer essentially and does this by working

0:08:49.400 --> 0:08:53.200
<v Speaker 1>with the press, and he's they're getting there, They're essentially

0:08:53.240 --> 0:08:57.960
<v Speaker 1>getting more funding through doing this. And one thing that

0:08:58.480 --> 0:09:01.280
<v Speaker 1>I think struck a lot of people about that about

0:09:01.280 --> 0:09:03.920
<v Speaker 1>that move was that The Wire had always been praised

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:06.520
<v Speaker 1>for its realism and so for something like that to

0:09:06.559 --> 0:09:10.200
<v Speaker 1>occur in a very grounded show. The implication is that

0:09:10.240 --> 0:09:13.439
<v Speaker 1>this happens, you know what I mean. Now, of course

0:09:13.600 --> 0:09:19.760
<v Speaker 1>critics didn't universally love that plot line, but it shows

0:09:19.840 --> 0:09:24.600
<v Speaker 1>us how common this debate is, this idea that there

0:09:24.679 --> 0:09:29.559
<v Speaker 1>might be some greater pattern to the tragedy that surrounds us.

0:09:30.800 --> 0:09:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Here are the facts. Unfortunately, there are no shortages of

0:09:34.720 --> 0:09:37.439
<v Speaker 1>real life cases, not on the wire, real life cases

0:09:37.520 --> 0:09:42.000
<v Speaker 1>where in parents or partners of a deceased individual are

0:09:42.160 --> 0:09:46.960
<v Speaker 1>certain that authorities, through either incompetence, indifference, or even corruption,

0:09:47.480 --> 0:09:50.920
<v Speaker 1>have misidentified a cause of death, essentially that they've ruled

0:09:50.920 --> 0:09:55.280
<v Speaker 1>a homicide and accident. And over recent decades in the US,

0:09:55.320 --> 0:10:00.480
<v Speaker 1>we've seen hundreds of these stories. One that's still with

0:10:00.520 --> 0:10:03.160
<v Speaker 1>me that I've been doing some outside research on is

0:10:03.280 --> 0:10:09.200
<v Speaker 1>the Kendrick Johnson case in Valdosta, Georgia. That's the basketball player,

0:10:09.480 --> 0:10:12.959
<v Speaker 1>the high school kid who was who was found dead,

0:10:13.520 --> 0:10:16.040
<v Speaker 1>rolled up in the rolled up in a Jim Matt

0:10:16.120 --> 0:10:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah yeah, and his parents say that, you know, bullies

0:10:21.720 --> 0:10:25.880
<v Speaker 1>killed or accidentally killed him, and the authorities argue otherwise,

0:10:26.720 --> 0:10:28.280
<v Speaker 1>They say he accidentally killed himself.

0:10:28.480 --> 0:10:28.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:10:30.200 --> 0:10:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Story for another day, maybe maybe we'll do a whole

0:10:32.360 --> 0:10:37.760
<v Speaker 1>podcast series on it one day. But this might surprise

0:10:37.800 --> 0:10:41.400
<v Speaker 1>some of us in the audience. Also, over the recent decades,

0:10:42.000 --> 0:10:47.040
<v Speaker 1>we've seen one surprising source of controversy for these debates

0:10:47.040 --> 0:10:50.400
<v Speaker 1>over accident versus homicide, and it comes in the case

0:10:50.840 --> 0:10:54.959
<v Speaker 1>of drowning, which is an unpleasant way to.

0:10:54.920 --> 0:10:56.800
<v Speaker 2>Go, of course, it really is.

0:10:57.320 --> 0:11:00.760
<v Speaker 1>But I do think it's surprising that, you know, when

0:11:00.800 --> 0:11:04.080
<v Speaker 1>you would think of accidental death versus homicide, you would

0:11:04.080 --> 0:11:08.600
<v Speaker 1>think of things like maybe firearm related deaths.

0:11:08.760 --> 0:11:15.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, exactly, Well that's not the case. In this country.

0:11:15.920 --> 0:11:18.920
<v Speaker 3>There are a lot of fairly large bodies of water

0:11:19.480 --> 0:11:20.800
<v Speaker 3>and smaller ones too.

0:11:21.280 --> 0:11:25.520
<v Speaker 2>They're everywhere water, it's everywhere, raging rivers, you know.

0:11:25.520 --> 0:11:33.000
<v Speaker 3>They they are, and people every year die, whether accidentally

0:11:33.160 --> 0:11:36.440
<v Speaker 3>or not accidentally, in these bodies of water, and to

0:11:36.640 --> 0:11:39.199
<v Speaker 3>a lot of people. According to the CDC, from two

0:11:39.200 --> 0:11:41.840
<v Speaker 3>thousand and five to twenty fourteen, there were an average

0:11:41.880 --> 0:11:47.920
<v Speaker 3>of three thousand, five hundred and thirty six fatal unintentional drownings.

0:11:49.320 --> 0:11:50.960
<v Speaker 2>And those were not related to boating.

0:11:51.400 --> 0:11:54.400
<v Speaker 3>No, no, so not like drinking and boating and that

0:11:54.480 --> 0:11:57.280
<v Speaker 3>kind of thing, and that that occurs annually within the

0:11:57.360 --> 0:12:01.280
<v Speaker 3>United States. So every year. That is that's pretty crazy.

0:12:01.280 --> 0:12:03.720
<v Speaker 3>It translates to about ten deaths a day.

0:12:04.600 --> 0:12:04.760
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:12:04.800 --> 0:12:06.800
<v Speaker 3>I just have to say, I grew up near Lake Lanier,

0:12:06.880 --> 0:12:10.120
<v Speaker 3>which is a fairly large man made lake here in Georgia,

0:12:10.559 --> 0:12:15.560
<v Speaker 3>and it is it would be surprising, maybe it would

0:12:15.559 --> 0:12:17.880
<v Speaker 3>be surprising to you, certainly surprising to me the number

0:12:17.920 --> 0:12:19.880
<v Speaker 3>of people who would accidentally drown in.

0:12:19.840 --> 0:12:21.640
<v Speaker 2>That lake every year, for sure.

0:12:21.760 --> 0:12:24.400
<v Speaker 3>And I was unaware of it as a kid, but

0:12:24.520 --> 0:12:27.760
<v Speaker 3>now when I see statistics about it, it's just it

0:12:27.880 --> 0:12:30.080
<v Speaker 3>blows my mind. And to be fair, a lot of

0:12:30.120 --> 0:12:33.880
<v Speaker 3>those do they end up having to do with drinking

0:12:33.960 --> 0:12:37.240
<v Speaker 3>and swimming, or drinking and boating, something like that. And

0:12:37.360 --> 0:12:39.080
<v Speaker 3>today's case that we're going to get into a little

0:12:39.120 --> 0:12:45.400
<v Speaker 3>later also involves perhaps drinking, perhaps drug use, and being

0:12:45.760 --> 0:12:46.840
<v Speaker 3>in a body of water.

0:12:47.080 --> 0:12:52.480
<v Speaker 1>I have a very tangentially related, perhaps fun fact.

0:12:52.400 --> 0:12:54.840
<v Speaker 3>For okay, I'll take some fun right now, which.

0:12:54.679 --> 0:12:56.880
<v Speaker 1>You probably already know and you probably already know. No,

0:12:57.480 --> 0:13:01.559
<v Speaker 1>it's this Georgia has no natural lakes. They're all man made.

0:13:01.600 --> 0:13:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Oh so that's that's a little palate cleanser we do.

0:13:05.600 --> 0:13:10.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm okay with that. Yeah, yeah. The ingenuity of mankind

0:13:10.200 --> 0:13:12.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, on full display here in Georgia. Yeah, but

0:13:12.679 --> 0:13:15.280
<v Speaker 2>we do have some swamps, that's right, we do have

0:13:15.320 --> 0:13:16.559
<v Speaker 2>some some swamps.

0:13:16.600 --> 0:13:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Not the best for swimming though, no, no, just for shwimmers.

0:13:22.120 --> 0:13:25.400
<v Speaker 2>Ross David Swimmer, is that the one he notoriously loves

0:13:25.400 --> 0:13:26.000
<v Speaker 2>a good swamp.

0:13:26.200 --> 0:13:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Okay, yes, swamp Ross used to was his name in

0:13:29.840 --> 0:13:34.320
<v Speaker 1>the pilot. They changed his character a little bit, but okay,

0:13:34.360 --> 0:13:37.360
<v Speaker 1>so that palate cleanser just helps us get further into

0:13:37.400 --> 0:13:40.800
<v Speaker 1>the rabbit hole here. Because of those drowning deaths. When

0:13:40.840 --> 0:13:43.600
<v Speaker 1>we look at drowning deaths, an additional three hundred and

0:13:43.600 --> 0:13:46.719
<v Speaker 1>thirty two people died each year in deaths that were

0:13:47.400 --> 0:13:51.079
<v Speaker 1>the linear esque ones voting related. Of the people who

0:13:51.120 --> 0:13:55.440
<v Speaker 1>die about one from drowning, about one in five are

0:13:55.640 --> 0:14:00.000
<v Speaker 1>children fourteen or younger. And that sadly makes brutal sense,

0:14:00.080 --> 0:14:00.480
<v Speaker 1>which is.

0:14:00.400 --> 0:14:03.360
<v Speaker 2>Why life fests are the law, you know, I mean,

0:14:03.559 --> 0:14:06.000
<v Speaker 2>kids under a certain age are required to wear life.

0:14:05.920 --> 0:14:08.679
<v Speaker 1>Fests and lifeguards, even in kiddie pools.

0:14:08.720 --> 0:14:09.120
<v Speaker 2>For sure.

0:14:09.760 --> 0:14:13.600
<v Speaker 3>And here's something that was surprising to me. Eighty percent

0:14:13.760 --> 0:14:17.880
<v Speaker 3>of drowning victims, according to the CDC, are male. That

0:14:18.520 --> 0:14:21.160
<v Speaker 3>doesn't make sense to me, but let's continue on down here.

0:14:21.200 --> 0:14:24.760
<v Speaker 3>Because almost fifty percent of drownings can be attributed in

0:14:24.840 --> 0:14:28.840
<v Speaker 3>some way or to some extent, to intoxication of some

0:14:28.960 --> 0:14:29.600
<v Speaker 3>kind or another.

0:14:29.920 --> 0:14:34.200
<v Speaker 2>How do you differentiate between a purposeful drowning and an

0:14:34.240 --> 0:14:35.480
<v Speaker 2>accidental drowning?

0:14:35.800 --> 0:14:40.360
<v Speaker 1>Ah, there there's the rub. It turns out that proving

0:14:40.560 --> 0:14:45.600
<v Speaker 1>a drowning was purposeful intentional a homicide. Proving that is

0:14:45.760 --> 0:14:49.640
<v Speaker 1>very very difficult. A lot of evidence can be washed away.

0:14:50.480 --> 0:14:57.200
<v Speaker 1>And because drowning is tragically common, and because fifty percent

0:14:57.240 --> 0:14:59.880
<v Speaker 1>of drownings in this country can be attributed to some

0:15:00.040 --> 0:15:06.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of inebriation, law enforcement is often it's easy to

0:15:06.560 --> 0:15:09.320
<v Speaker 1>assume it was an accident because the odds against it

0:15:09.360 --> 0:15:11.800
<v Speaker 1>being a homicide statistically or very high.

0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:14.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, short of there being like a cinder block tied

0:15:14.040 --> 0:15:17.000
<v Speaker 2>to someone's leg or the like, or maybe you know,

0:15:17.400 --> 0:15:19.920
<v Speaker 2>choking marks around a neck or something like that, or

0:15:19.960 --> 0:15:23.680
<v Speaker 2>some sign of trauma that someone was thrown or held

0:15:23.720 --> 0:15:26.960
<v Speaker 2>down or whatever, it could very easily be ruled an

0:15:27.000 --> 0:15:29.800
<v Speaker 2>accidental death. And again that benefits. Again, we're not saying

0:15:29.800 --> 0:15:31.440
<v Speaker 2>they're doing it on purpose of being lazy, but that

0:15:31.440 --> 0:15:35.360
<v Speaker 2>absolutely is probably a desired outcome for law enforcement to

0:15:35.400 --> 0:15:37.560
<v Speaker 2>say Okay, close the book on that. Let's move on

0:15:37.600 --> 0:15:39.160
<v Speaker 2>to the million other cases that we have.

0:15:39.720 --> 0:15:41.480
<v Speaker 3>I'm just jumping through here, and I know we're going

0:15:41.560 --> 0:15:44.000
<v Speaker 3>to hit on this, but the concept of your thinking

0:15:44.040 --> 0:15:46.960
<v Speaker 3>in your mind of, Okay, we found a drowning victim,

0:15:47.040 --> 0:15:50.160
<v Speaker 3>but there is blunt force trauma, Like there's evidence of

0:15:50.160 --> 0:15:51.120
<v Speaker 3>blunt force trauma to.

0:15:51.040 --> 0:15:51.920
<v Speaker 2>The head or something.

0:15:52.040 --> 0:15:57.680
<v Speaker 3>Sure, how how can you fully rule out that that

0:15:57.720 --> 0:16:00.520
<v Speaker 3>didn't occur or when a fall happened or you know

0:16:00.680 --> 0:16:05.080
<v Speaker 3>there it just becomes it becomes a labyrinth of you

0:16:05.440 --> 0:16:09.280
<v Speaker 3>have to basically work to say this was a homicide.

0:16:08.800 --> 0:16:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Rather you yeah, the order of conclusions or operations, the

0:16:13.280 --> 0:16:18.720
<v Speaker 1>sort of the decision tree yeah does have when it

0:16:18.720 --> 0:16:22.400
<v Speaker 1>comes to drowning. Uh, the best way to say it

0:16:22.440 --> 0:16:26.480
<v Speaker 1>is that medical examiners have to rule out every other

0:16:26.680 --> 0:16:31.560
<v Speaker 1>possible explanation as to why someone ended up dead in

0:16:31.640 --> 0:16:33.640
<v Speaker 1>the water. And they have to think of, you know,

0:16:34.000 --> 0:16:38.600
<v Speaker 1>drug overdoses, right, maybe maybe a heart attack, maybe a

0:16:38.720 --> 0:16:41.960
<v Speaker 1>slip and fall and that caused blunt injury to their

0:16:42.040 --> 0:16:44.360
<v Speaker 1>head and they were unconscious and couldn't get out of

0:16:44.400 --> 0:16:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the water, And only after saying it was definitely none

0:16:47.640 --> 0:16:49.880
<v Speaker 1>of those things, are they able to say maybe it

0:16:49.920 --> 0:16:50.640
<v Speaker 1>was murder.

0:16:50.560 --> 0:16:52.880
<v Speaker 2>Not to mention the fact that unless a body is

0:16:52.880 --> 0:16:56.000
<v Speaker 2>weighted down, which would be clear indication of foul play,

0:16:56.320 --> 0:17:00.440
<v Speaker 2>it's gonna drift some distance, so it's harder to tie

0:17:00.440 --> 0:17:04.040
<v Speaker 2>it to the location where the fall maybe actually happen,

0:17:04.160 --> 0:17:06.600
<v Speaker 2>or say, oh, this is definitely where they hit their head, etc.

0:17:07.200 --> 0:17:09.359
<v Speaker 2>So it really is kind of a perfect storm of

0:17:09.400 --> 0:17:10.880
<v Speaker 2>being able to declare it an.

0:17:10.800 --> 0:17:14.040
<v Speaker 3>Accident, yeah, depending in which body of water they are recovered.

0:17:14.280 --> 0:17:17.200
<v Speaker 1>And then it gets more complicated because all of that

0:17:17.320 --> 0:17:21.200
<v Speaker 1>if all of those things somehow happen and a medical

0:17:21.240 --> 0:17:26.640
<v Speaker 1>examiner is able to say this indicates that it could

0:17:26.680 --> 0:17:29.600
<v Speaker 1>only be a murder if that very rare set of

0:17:29.640 --> 0:17:35.040
<v Speaker 1>circumstances occurs, then the next step is to prosecute or find,

0:17:35.400 --> 0:17:37.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, someone who would have done this, And like

0:17:37.840 --> 0:17:41.119
<v Speaker 1>a lot of violent crime, in homicide murders that we

0:17:41.720 --> 0:17:46.320
<v Speaker 1>know of and that are proven, the criminal is usually

0:17:46.359 --> 0:17:48.679
<v Speaker 1>someone familiar with the victim.

0:17:49.040 --> 0:17:50.520
<v Speaker 2>It's not just a random right.

0:17:50.960 --> 0:17:53.640
<v Speaker 1>But prosecutors have to prove that. They have to prove

0:17:53.680 --> 0:17:56.200
<v Speaker 1>a drowning was intentional, which means they have to build

0:17:56.240 --> 0:18:00.440
<v Speaker 1>a case on circumstantial evidence. They have to be able

0:18:00.520 --> 0:18:02.600
<v Speaker 1>not just to say, okay, the flow of the river

0:18:02.760 --> 0:18:05.960
<v Speaker 1>is this, or we know that the lake works this way.

0:18:06.040 --> 0:18:10.720
<v Speaker 1>They have to also say, you know these people were fighting,

0:18:11.600 --> 0:18:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Tammy and Tamara or whatever were angry at each other outive. Yeah,

0:18:15.640 --> 0:18:18.520
<v Speaker 1>they have to do motive exactly where there was money,

0:18:19.080 --> 0:18:21.960
<v Speaker 1>There were money issues, there was an insurance policy that

0:18:22.080 --> 0:18:26.439
<v Speaker 1>just got taken out forty eight hours before, there was

0:18:26.520 --> 0:18:30.520
<v Speaker 1>trouble with the law. And because of all of these factors,

0:18:30.560 --> 0:18:34.280
<v Speaker 1>it's very difficult to know how many homicides involving drowning

0:18:34.520 --> 0:18:37.879
<v Speaker 1>actually exist, and there's not much research on it. Local

0:18:37.920 --> 0:18:42.240
<v Speaker 1>police statistics, of course, are not always as well documented

0:18:42.320 --> 0:18:46.920
<v Speaker 1>as people would hope. Like consider this, Matt, you give

0:18:46.960 --> 0:18:52.000
<v Speaker 1>us the statistics of drowning. Overall proving cases of drowning.

0:18:53.119 --> 0:18:57.400
<v Speaker 1>According to the FBI in twenty seventeen, we just pull

0:18:57.480 --> 0:19:00.800
<v Speaker 1>one year from their uniform crime report, there were only

0:19:00.880 --> 0:19:04.400
<v Speaker 1>eight homicides by drowning. And that's out of what more

0:19:04.440 --> 0:19:08.160
<v Speaker 1>than three and a half thousand, thirty five hundred per year,

0:19:08.800 --> 0:19:10.520
<v Speaker 1>So they were out of those that were only able

0:19:10.560 --> 0:19:14.919
<v Speaker 1>to prove that eight were homicides. And this bothers people

0:19:16.119 --> 0:19:18.359
<v Speaker 1>in multiple aspects of law enforcement.

0:19:18.720 --> 0:19:21.639
<v Speaker 3>There's a diver that's less than an average number of

0:19:22.400 --> 0:19:23.760
<v Speaker 3>drownings that occur per day.

0:19:24.200 --> 0:19:26.919
<v Speaker 1>Yes, yeah, yeah, yeah, exactly. That's a great way to

0:19:26.960 --> 0:19:31.600
<v Speaker 1>look at it. So according to people like a diver

0:19:31.760 --> 0:19:38.440
<v Speaker 1>named Andrea Zaferis, who began assisting homicide investigators with cases

0:19:38.440 --> 0:19:42.119
<v Speaker 1>involving drowning way back in nineteen ninety eight, this diver says,

0:19:42.320 --> 0:19:46.320
<v Speaker 1>we're absolutely missing more than we're catching in homicide drowning cases.

0:19:46.560 --> 0:19:49.640
<v Speaker 1>A vast majority of drownings are accidental, but many which

0:19:49.680 --> 0:19:52.720
<v Speaker 1>can be the result of foul foul play, are overlooked.

0:19:53.040 --> 0:19:54.840
<v Speaker 1>So they're saying they're not They're saying, look, I'm not

0:19:54.880 --> 0:19:57.960
<v Speaker 1>saying that everybody who drowned was murdered, but I'm saying

0:19:58.000 --> 0:20:03.359
<v Speaker 1>we are missing stuff, and behind the scenes, everybody knows it.

0:20:03.440 --> 0:20:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Because also a lot of a lot of professionals like

0:20:08.680 --> 0:20:11.359
<v Speaker 1>that it's their career to investigate this stuff don't receive

0:20:11.400 --> 0:20:12.399
<v Speaker 1>the training they need.

0:20:12.960 --> 0:20:17.720
<v Speaker 2>But what if a killer knew that too, Like knew

0:20:17.720 --> 0:20:20.879
<v Speaker 2>those stats and knew how easily these things can go

0:20:20.960 --> 0:20:23.840
<v Speaker 2>under the radar and be ruled an accident. Because if

0:20:23.840 --> 0:20:27.840
<v Speaker 2>you ask me, drowning someone wouldn't necessarily be the first

0:20:28.320 --> 0:20:32.359
<v Speaker 2>way you might choose to kill somebody. It's a little tenuous, right, Like,

0:20:32.520 --> 0:20:34.959
<v Speaker 2>unless certain things are in place, how are you going

0:20:35.040 --> 0:20:39.000
<v Speaker 2>to know if the person actually died or not. It's

0:20:39.040 --> 0:20:42.240
<v Speaker 2>an interesting question. But what if someone did know and

0:20:42.920 --> 0:20:46.320
<v Speaker 2>was able to kind of fit this into their plan? Right?

0:20:46.640 --> 0:20:50.920
<v Speaker 1>What if some of these accidental drownings are in fact murders,

0:20:51.400 --> 0:20:55.280
<v Speaker 1>And furthermore, what if these murders are related.

0:20:55.800 --> 0:20:58.480
<v Speaker 3>We'll talk about that right after a word from our sponsor.

0:21:05.920 --> 0:21:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Here's where it gets crazy. We are entering the realm

0:21:10.000 --> 0:21:13.600
<v Speaker 1>of what is commonly called the smiley face murder theory,

0:21:13.680 --> 0:21:18.280
<v Speaker 1>the smiley face murders, the smiley face killer, or slight

0:21:18.320 --> 0:21:20.879
<v Speaker 1>spoiler alert here killers.

0:21:22.720 --> 0:21:22.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:21:23.000 --> 0:21:27.720
<v Speaker 1>This theory argues that more than forty cases I think

0:21:27.880 --> 0:21:32.200
<v Speaker 1>forty five or so of fatal drownings between nineteen ninety

0:21:32.240 --> 0:21:35.480
<v Speaker 1>seven and at least two thousand and eight were mistakenly

0:21:35.560 --> 0:21:39.160
<v Speaker 1>labeled accidental when they were in fact homicides.

0:21:39.680 --> 0:21:42.320
<v Speaker 3>And that number, by the way, as we go through

0:21:42.359 --> 0:21:48.280
<v Speaker 3>this has the number of suspected cases of fatal drowning

0:21:48.280 --> 0:21:53.359
<v Speaker 3>related to this case hasn't necessarily grown, but the possible

0:21:53.480 --> 0:21:56.639
<v Speaker 3>cases identified by some of these guys has risen up

0:21:56.640 --> 0:21:58.600
<v Speaker 3>into the three hundred something range.

0:21:58.880 --> 0:22:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Right in this that number comes often from people who

0:22:03.520 --> 0:22:06.880
<v Speaker 1>later came to the theory and started finding what they

0:22:06.960 --> 0:22:09.360
<v Speaker 1>felt were commonalities.

0:22:08.640 --> 0:22:11.359
<v Speaker 3>And some of the original investigators.

0:22:10.640 --> 0:22:15.480
<v Speaker 1>And some of the original investigators, So here's the gist.

0:22:16.000 --> 0:22:22.520
<v Speaker 1>These cases of fatal drownings involved young men, college age

0:22:22.720 --> 0:22:26.359
<v Speaker 1>dudes who were found dead in bodies of water across

0:22:26.560 --> 0:22:30.680
<v Speaker 1>several different Midwestern states in the US over the last decade,

0:22:31.320 --> 0:22:37.439
<v Speaker 1>and the investigators eventually started using the term serial killer,

0:22:37.480 --> 0:22:40.359
<v Speaker 1>which a lot of professionals hate because it feels a

0:22:40.400 --> 0:22:45.800
<v Speaker 1>little alarmist and hyperbolic. But why smiley face? Did they

0:22:45.880 --> 0:22:48.240
<v Speaker 1>just pick that one? We all know what as smiley faces.

0:22:48.320 --> 0:22:49.879
<v Speaker 1>We don't have to overthink that. It's like, we all

0:22:50.040 --> 0:22:53.160
<v Speaker 1>know what drowning is. Smiley face, two dots, bottom half

0:22:53.200 --> 0:22:53.760
<v Speaker 1>of a circle.

0:22:53.840 --> 0:22:56.399
<v Speaker 2>Oh, it looks like a face. Well, in this case,

0:22:57.280 --> 0:23:01.159
<v Speaker 2>the idea of the smiley face because and connected to

0:23:01.560 --> 0:23:07.240
<v Speaker 2>this alleged string of murders cluster of murders. When it

0:23:07.520 --> 0:23:14.080
<v Speaker 2>was announced publicly that police had discovered graffiti depicting that

0:23:14.960 --> 0:23:18.760
<v Speaker 2>ubiquitous two dots and half a circle smiley face near

0:23:18.800 --> 0:23:24.120
<v Speaker 2>the locations where they believe the killer or potentially killers

0:23:24.520 --> 0:23:30.240
<v Speaker 2>dumped bodies in at least a dozen of these cases. Also,

0:23:30.520 --> 0:23:35.920
<v Speaker 2>a phrase sinsinewa was also cited as being found near

0:23:36.119 --> 0:23:39.240
<v Speaker 2>some of these areas that were being investigated in connection

0:23:39.720 --> 0:23:43.080
<v Speaker 2>with bodies found floating in water.

0:23:43.400 --> 0:23:46.800
<v Speaker 3>I would like to point out here that the smiley faces, again,

0:23:46.840 --> 0:23:50.120
<v Speaker 3>it's only in thirteen of these identified forty something cases,

0:23:50.560 --> 0:23:54.959
<v Speaker 3>but it changes a lot. You can go online and

0:23:55.080 --> 0:23:58.240
<v Speaker 3>see pictures of several of the alleged smiley face connected

0:23:58.280 --> 0:24:01.720
<v Speaker 3>graffiti's and they really like one of them looks like

0:24:01.760 --> 0:24:05.520
<v Speaker 3>a little version of a devil or demon. They're in

0:24:05.600 --> 0:24:11.760
<v Speaker 3>varying colors, varying sizes and styles. It's interesting that it's

0:24:11.840 --> 0:24:15.119
<v Speaker 3>not a single symbol. You know, if that was going

0:24:15.160 --> 0:24:17.080
<v Speaker 3>to be just a serial killer, you'd think that it

0:24:17.119 --> 0:24:20.280
<v Speaker 3>would just be a symbol. But perhaps as we get

0:24:20.280 --> 0:24:23.600
<v Speaker 3>through here, it'll make more sense of why it would change, right.

0:24:23.720 --> 0:24:26.560
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk about that in a few minutes as well,

0:24:26.680 --> 0:24:31.119
<v Speaker 1>the differing interpretations of what a smiley face might be

0:24:31.480 --> 0:24:35.280
<v Speaker 1>or what the import of it is. Let's look let's

0:24:35.320 --> 0:24:38.080
<v Speaker 1>step back, let's look at the proponents, the creators of

0:24:38.119 --> 0:24:41.040
<v Speaker 1>this theory. To do so, we journeyed to New York

0:24:41.160 --> 0:24:45.320
<v Speaker 1>where we meet New York Police Department detectives Kevin Gannon

0:24:45.400 --> 0:24:49.600
<v Speaker 1>and Anthony d'Arte now retired, now retire, both retired and

0:24:49.800 --> 0:24:55.440
<v Speaker 1>private investigators. In two thousand and eight, they announced that

0:24:55.560 --> 0:25:00.240
<v Speaker 1>they believed one Patrick McNeil, a twenty four year old

0:25:00.520 --> 0:25:02.879
<v Speaker 1>accounting major at the time of his death, did not

0:25:03.119 --> 0:25:08.359
<v Speaker 1>drown accidentally. But Okay, what happened to McNeil at the time,

0:25:08.440 --> 0:25:12.640
<v Speaker 1>by the way, Gannon was, Gannon was a working detective.

0:25:12.680 --> 0:25:13.800
<v Speaker 1>He wasn't retired yet.

0:25:14.000 --> 0:25:14.400
<v Speaker 2>Correct.

0:25:15.000 --> 0:25:18.000
<v Speaker 3>So McNeil was hanging out in the East Side, the

0:25:18.080 --> 0:25:21.119
<v Speaker 3>Upper east Side of New York City. He was having

0:25:21.119 --> 0:25:24.080
<v Speaker 3>a night of it. He was drinking. It was February sixteenth,

0:25:24.240 --> 0:25:27.159
<v Speaker 3>nineteen ninety seven. He's at this place called the Dapper

0:25:27.280 --> 0:25:31.000
<v Speaker 3>Dog that's on East ninety second Street there in New

0:25:31.080 --> 0:25:34.280
<v Speaker 3>York City, and he's hanging out, he's doing his thing,

0:25:34.440 --> 0:25:38.080
<v Speaker 3>he's having a night of it. He disappears, and then

0:25:38.200 --> 0:25:42.280
<v Speaker 3>later on April seventh, nineteen ninety seven, his body is discovered.

0:25:42.640 --> 0:25:46.200
<v Speaker 3>He's discovered near the sixty ninth Street pier in Brooklyn.

0:25:46.440 --> 0:25:47.879
<v Speaker 3>He is floating in the water.

0:25:49.280 --> 0:25:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so Gannon at the time is specifically working and

0:25:53.040 --> 0:25:55.320
<v Speaker 1>missing persons and he catches the case.

0:25:56.080 --> 0:25:57.920
<v Speaker 2>It's in the East River, by the way, the.

0:25:57.840 --> 0:26:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Case is ruled unintentionalental and this is one of those

0:26:03.440 --> 0:26:07.320
<v Speaker 1>things that, you know, it's weird. A lot of a

0:26:07.320 --> 0:26:10.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of people in law enforcement or in related jobs

0:26:11.960 --> 0:26:15.240
<v Speaker 1>tend to get a case or certain cases that that

0:26:15.400 --> 0:26:18.480
<v Speaker 1>stay with them, that haunt them, you know, And this

0:26:18.880 --> 0:26:23.320
<v Speaker 1>was it for Gannon. He did not agree with the

0:26:23.359 --> 0:26:27.120
<v Speaker 1>official findings, and he spoke with the parents of McNeil

0:26:27.160 --> 0:26:30.800
<v Speaker 1>and he said, you know what, job aside, I am

0:26:30.880 --> 0:26:37.240
<v Speaker 1>not giving up this investigation until I find the real

0:26:37.320 --> 0:26:40.119
<v Speaker 1>story of what happened to your son. And this stays

0:26:40.160 --> 0:26:42.960
<v Speaker 1>with him throughout his career. When he retires, he enlists

0:26:43.160 --> 0:26:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Anthony d'Arte, who is his old partner, and he says,

0:26:46.359 --> 0:26:51.239
<v Speaker 1>let's let's do this full time. It's similar to in

0:26:51.280 --> 0:26:55.680
<v Speaker 1>a way of want to do another fictional comparison, it's

0:26:55.720 --> 0:27:02.880
<v Speaker 1>similar to Marty and rust Coal in True Detective season one,

0:27:03.280 --> 0:27:06.920
<v Speaker 1>right when this doesn't really spoil a story, but there's

0:27:07.000 --> 0:27:10.960
<v Speaker 1>a segment where neither of them are working for law enforcement,

0:27:11.359 --> 0:27:13.800
<v Speaker 1>but there's a case they can't let go and they

0:27:13.840 --> 0:27:17.920
<v Speaker 1>become they're working as pis essentially that's what these guys

0:27:17.960 --> 0:27:23.160
<v Speaker 1>do in real life, and Gannon mortgages his house, spends

0:27:23.280 --> 0:27:27.919
<v Speaker 1>his savings researching this, chasing these cases, and they start

0:27:28.240 --> 0:27:33.760
<v Speaker 1>linking McNeil's death to other cases that they feel have

0:27:33.920 --> 0:27:41.280
<v Speaker 1>disturbing things in common, because it turns out that McNeil

0:27:41.400 --> 0:27:44.520
<v Speaker 1>is not the only person in this part of the

0:27:44.560 --> 0:27:47.920
<v Speaker 1>world who went out for a night partying with their

0:27:47.960 --> 0:27:51.720
<v Speaker 1>friends and was later found dead in the water.

0:27:52.000 --> 0:27:55.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, let's jump right back quickly, just to talk about

0:27:55.280 --> 0:28:01.200
<v Speaker 3>how McNeil is a college senior. He is, like a

0:28:01.240 --> 0:28:03.000
<v Speaker 3>lot of the people were going to talk about, he's

0:28:03.119 --> 0:28:06.280
<v Speaker 3>pretty athletic. He's kind of at the top of his game, right,

0:28:06.359 --> 0:28:09.520
<v Speaker 3>He's a young white male, And that is one of

0:28:09.520 --> 0:28:12.280
<v Speaker 3>the things that ends up linking a lot of these

0:28:12.680 --> 0:28:16.919
<v Speaker 3>cases together, just one of the top level things. So

0:28:16.960 --> 0:28:19.520
<v Speaker 3>they noticed that McNeil's death was similar to that of

0:28:19.560 --> 0:28:23.000
<v Speaker 3>a gentleman named Lawrence Andrews. This guy was twenty two

0:28:23.080 --> 0:28:25.600
<v Speaker 3>years old. He was New Year's Eve in two thousand

0:28:25.640 --> 0:28:29.160
<v Speaker 3>and six. He was drinking near Grand Central Terminal and

0:28:29.359 --> 0:28:33.360
<v Speaker 3>he vanished, and then later his body was discovered on

0:28:34.119 --> 0:28:38.400
<v Speaker 3>February twelfth, two thousand and seven, also off the sixty

0:28:38.480 --> 0:28:42.640
<v Speaker 3>ninth Street Pier, close to where McNeil was.

0:28:42.640 --> 0:28:45.000
<v Speaker 2>Found, and Gannon.

0:28:46.120 --> 0:28:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Says that he and his partner studied the water flow

0:28:48.960 --> 0:28:52.479
<v Speaker 1>of the area and the contours of the land, and

0:28:52.520 --> 0:28:55.760
<v Speaker 1>he said, look, the similarities between these two cases cannot

0:28:55.800 --> 0:29:00.200
<v Speaker 1>just be accident. He believed that in both cases, is

0:29:00.440 --> 0:29:03.560
<v Speaker 1>the victims were drugged with GHB.

0:29:04.760 --> 0:29:06.880
<v Speaker 2>Was the dayreak drug right right right?

0:29:07.720 --> 0:29:12.520
<v Speaker 1>That makes you know, insensate, unconscious, unable to.

0:29:12.160 --> 0:29:15.000
<v Speaker 2>Fight back or defend yourself. Is it essentially like a

0:29:15.040 --> 0:29:17.800
<v Speaker 2>sedative or is it more like maybe you know, what

0:29:17.840 --> 0:29:20.880
<v Speaker 2>they would call a benzodiazepin, like a xanax or something

0:29:20.920 --> 0:29:23.200
<v Speaker 2>where it kind of makes you black out almost where

0:29:23.200 --> 0:29:24.440
<v Speaker 2>you don't remember what's going on.

0:29:24.840 --> 0:29:28.560
<v Speaker 1>I do know it affects. It does affect memory, I believe,

0:29:28.720 --> 0:29:33.360
<v Speaker 1>and people have used it as a party drug. But

0:29:33.480 --> 0:29:37.040
<v Speaker 1>I always learned about it as as I always learned

0:29:37.080 --> 0:29:40.240
<v Speaker 1>about it as you know, a drug that creeps give

0:29:40.320 --> 0:29:45.479
<v Speaker 1>to people to sexually assault, and technically I believe it

0:29:45.560 --> 0:29:50.040
<v Speaker 1>is a central nervous system depressant. Anyhow, he says, this

0:29:50.280 --> 0:29:54.959
<v Speaker 1>specific substance has been given to these guys. They were

0:29:55.000 --> 0:29:57.600
<v Speaker 1>drugged and then they were placed in the water after

0:29:57.640 --> 0:30:00.000
<v Speaker 1>some amount of time, which will become very important later.

0:30:00.960 --> 0:30:01.800
<v Speaker 4>And then.

0:30:03.240 --> 0:30:07.240
<v Speaker 1>These two guys learn that four young men had vanished

0:30:07.240 --> 0:30:10.280
<v Speaker 1>in Minnesota and Wisconsin over a forty day period in

0:30:10.360 --> 0:30:14.760
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and three, and that they, like McNeil and

0:30:14.840 --> 0:30:18.600
<v Speaker 1>like Lawrence Andrews, had a lot of the similar things

0:30:18.680 --> 0:30:21.880
<v Speaker 1>that you had just described. Mat somebody's out, maybe partying

0:30:21.920 --> 0:30:27.280
<v Speaker 1>with their friends, and then they walk off, perhaps not

0:30:27.520 --> 0:30:30.080
<v Speaker 1>seeming to be in a state of distress, and then

0:30:30.120 --> 0:30:35.120
<v Speaker 1>they disappear. The detectives did something interesting here, and it

0:30:35.120 --> 0:30:38.280
<v Speaker 1>goes to a point you made earlier, nol. They started

0:30:38.400 --> 0:30:42.200
<v Speaker 1>looking not to where the bodies were physically found, but

0:30:42.560 --> 0:30:45.880
<v Speaker 1>to where, according to their best guests, the bodies had

0:30:46.040 --> 0:30:50.360
<v Speaker 1>entered the water right and that's where they found the

0:30:50.400 --> 0:30:55.800
<v Speaker 1>smiley faces. And again, as as established earlier, not they

0:30:55.840 --> 0:31:01.960
<v Speaker 1>didn't find forty five different smiley face icons for every

0:31:02.680 --> 0:31:06.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, every body that was discovered. They only found

0:31:07.960 --> 0:31:10.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty two or twenty something at the time.

0:31:11.800 --> 0:31:13.960
<v Speaker 2>I know we're gonna get there, but I do want

0:31:14.000 --> 0:31:16.480
<v Speaker 2>to say that that is a as we mentioned, a

0:31:16.520 --> 0:31:22.520
<v Speaker 2>pretty ubiquitous, very low key graffiti. Everyone knows how to

0:31:22.560 --> 0:31:25.640
<v Speaker 2>do it. You know, any of your fair weather taggers.

0:31:25.840 --> 0:31:27.640
<v Speaker 2>That would be a pretty easy go to to just

0:31:27.680 --> 0:31:30.360
<v Speaker 2>do a circle, two dots and a half a circle.

0:31:30.080 --> 0:31:30.240
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:31:30.400 --> 0:31:32.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and the guy who made this smiley face.

0:31:34.640 --> 0:31:39.240
<v Speaker 1>Work of genius. Really, I imagine doing something that important.

0:31:39.280 --> 0:31:40.400
<v Speaker 1>It's three lines.

0:31:40.480 --> 0:31:42.640
<v Speaker 2>It's one of those things too, where it's like such

0:31:42.680 --> 0:31:45.360
<v Speaker 2>a parallel thinking type thing and such a simple thing.

0:31:45.360 --> 0:31:48.560
<v Speaker 2>I don't I almost guarantee there's no one like credited

0:31:48.840 --> 0:31:51.640
<v Speaker 2>with the smiley face. Actually, I think there might be.

0:31:51.880 --> 0:31:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Actually I think there might be, and it may be

0:31:55.640 --> 0:31:59.600
<v Speaker 1>just because of just because that's the person who got

0:31:59.640 --> 0:32:02.720
<v Speaker 1>it on a T shirt that was have a nice day, maybe, right, Yeah,

0:32:02.800 --> 0:32:04.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe that's what I'm thinking of.

0:32:04.160 --> 0:32:10.720
<v Speaker 2>Harvey ross Ball, yep. Interesting fifty years ago in Worcester, Massachusetts,

0:32:12.040 --> 0:32:16.360
<v Speaker 2>an American graphic artist. He's credited as creating this. Okay,

0:32:16.400 --> 0:32:17.160
<v Speaker 2>that's right, I did.

0:32:17.400 --> 0:32:19.600
<v Speaker 1>I think I did an episode of Maybe Stuff of

0:32:19.680 --> 0:32:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Genius about that. A lot of people in the US

0:32:22.040 --> 0:32:26.000
<v Speaker 1>learn about that through the film adaptation of Forrest Gump

0:32:26.200 --> 0:32:29.680
<v Speaker 1>when the guy's going on his running streak and then

0:32:29.800 --> 0:32:30.920
<v Speaker 1>he wipes his face.

0:32:30.640 --> 0:32:31.960
<v Speaker 2>With the right. Yeah.

0:32:32.040 --> 0:32:36.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but that aside, it is a very very very

0:32:36.920 --> 0:32:40.600
<v Speaker 1>very common. Dare I say ubiquitous icon.

0:32:40.840 --> 0:32:42.760
<v Speaker 2>It's funny not to get a too off talk, but

0:32:43.120 --> 0:32:44.800
<v Speaker 2>you guys know, I worked on a show called Happy

0:32:44.800 --> 0:32:48.320
<v Speaker 2>Face about the Happy Face serial killer, and he was

0:32:48.400 --> 0:32:51.640
<v Speaker 2>given that moniker because he signed his letters to the

0:32:51.680 --> 0:32:55.440
<v Speaker 2>press with that very same icon. And when you google

0:32:55.760 --> 0:32:59.200
<v Speaker 2>Smiley Face Killer, happy Face Killer comes up a lot too,

0:32:59.240 --> 0:33:01.840
<v Speaker 2>so they're often kind of conflated because of the similarities

0:33:01.840 --> 0:33:03.200
<v Speaker 2>in the in the monikers.

0:33:03.640 --> 0:33:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Right, Yeah, that's that's a very important distinction. These are

0:33:07.840 --> 0:33:09.800
<v Speaker 1>These are, as far as we know, not related, and

0:33:10.080 --> 0:33:12.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't think Gannon or d'artay are arguing that they are.

0:33:13.200 --> 0:33:18.800
<v Speaker 1>But they are arguing that they found copious evidence suggesting

0:33:18.840 --> 0:33:21.760
<v Speaker 1>that McNeil, who again is sort of the genesis the

0:33:21.800 --> 0:33:27.160
<v Speaker 1>origin point for this theory, that McNeil didn't just walk

0:33:27.200 --> 0:33:31.120
<v Speaker 1>off a few sheets to the wind and then fall

0:33:31.160 --> 0:33:39.000
<v Speaker 1>in a river and drown. They're saying that someone intoxicated him,

0:33:39.080 --> 0:33:43.400
<v Speaker 1>they drugged him. There was a car seen following him

0:33:43.440 --> 0:33:47.720
<v Speaker 1>after he left the bar, the Dapper Dog. They're also

0:33:47.720 --> 0:33:51.280
<v Speaker 1>saying he had ligature marks on his neck, charring on

0:33:51.320 --> 0:33:54.560
<v Speaker 1>his head and torso, and that the way his body

0:33:54.600 --> 0:34:01.120
<v Speaker 1>was positioned was inconsistent with normal drowning. So someone tortured him,

0:34:01.480 --> 0:34:05.840
<v Speaker 1>drugged him, tortured him and then placed him in the water.

0:34:06.720 --> 0:34:10.160
<v Speaker 1>They said he had been stalked, drugged, abducted, bound burned,

0:34:10.840 --> 0:34:13.440
<v Speaker 1>and then killed and then dumped in the water.

0:34:14.280 --> 0:34:16.520
<v Speaker 3>Well, and it you know, the one major thing that

0:34:16.560 --> 0:34:19.880
<v Speaker 3>makes sense there is that he was missing for a month,

0:34:20.360 --> 0:34:24.360
<v Speaker 3>you know, so it's he dropped off the map, he

0:34:24.480 --> 0:34:27.600
<v Speaker 3>was somewhere, and then forty days later he was found dead.

0:34:28.080 --> 0:34:30.200
<v Speaker 3>And he you know, he doesn't seem like he was

0:34:30.320 --> 0:34:31.920
<v Speaker 3>sitting in the water for forty.

0:34:31.719 --> 0:34:33.319
<v Speaker 2>Days exactly, right.

0:34:33.400 --> 0:34:35.200
<v Speaker 1>It seems like he had been in the water for

0:34:35.239 --> 0:34:39.400
<v Speaker 1>a relatively short amount of time, right, And we see

0:34:39.560 --> 0:34:42.160
<v Speaker 1>that that's another commonality they look for in some of

0:34:42.200 --> 0:34:46.440
<v Speaker 1>these cases is the the the amount of time, the

0:34:46.480 --> 0:34:49.839
<v Speaker 1>gap between when a victim was last seen and when

0:34:49.880 --> 0:34:52.960
<v Speaker 1>their body was discovered. And in some cases that's that's

0:34:53.040 --> 0:34:57.880
<v Speaker 1>quite a stretch, you know. They said that McNeil was

0:34:58.000 --> 0:35:02.919
<v Speaker 1>murdered by what they called this Miley Face gang. See,

0:35:02.920 --> 0:35:06.840
<v Speaker 1>because they don't believe it's just one person. They believe

0:35:06.920 --> 0:35:11.439
<v Speaker 1>there is a group doing this. That's the only way

0:35:11.480 --> 0:35:17.400
<v Speaker 1>they think you can explain the regional distribution of the

0:35:17.480 --> 0:35:22.320
<v Speaker 1>murders twenty five cities across eleven states since nineteen ninety seven,

0:35:22.440 --> 0:35:26.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe even continuing today according to them, and we talked

0:35:26.600 --> 0:35:29.919
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about the commonalities they use to link

0:35:29.960 --> 0:35:34.320
<v Speaker 1>these cases, But what are they other than the method

0:35:34.400 --> 0:35:37.040
<v Speaker 1>of murder, which would be drugging and drowning.

0:35:37.520 --> 0:35:40.040
<v Speaker 3>One of the big things they noticed is that these

0:35:40.080 --> 0:35:43.880
<v Speaker 3>guys were very similar with regards to their demographics. These

0:35:43.920 --> 0:35:46.600
<v Speaker 3>are young men, a lot of them college age, who

0:35:47.040 --> 0:35:50.920
<v Speaker 3>disappeared after a night of drinking, specifically going out and drinking,

0:35:51.320 --> 0:35:54.239
<v Speaker 3>and they did end up dying. They also noticed that

0:35:54.280 --> 0:35:57.480
<v Speaker 3>these guys are athletic, a lot of them, at least

0:35:57.960 --> 0:35:59.680
<v Speaker 3>the majority of these cases.

0:35:59.360 --> 0:36:04.400
<v Speaker 2>Were young white men who were athletic, and this purported

0:36:04.600 --> 0:36:07.640
<v Speaker 2>symbol of what you could call, I guess, a gang

0:36:07.719 --> 0:36:11.600
<v Speaker 2>or a cell of potential killers. The smiley faces were

0:36:11.680 --> 0:36:14.760
<v Speaker 2>drawn on walls around just twenty two of the crime

0:36:14.800 --> 0:36:19.239
<v Speaker 2>scenes in five different states, including Indiana, Iowa, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania,

0:36:19.320 --> 0:36:22.160
<v Speaker 2>and Ohio. We also have the size and shape of

0:36:22.200 --> 0:36:27.560
<v Speaker 2>the smiley faces varying, and the paint used also varying.

0:36:28.400 --> 0:36:31.240
<v Speaker 2>Some of the faces, for example, might have had horns,

0:36:31.239 --> 0:36:34.080
<v Speaker 2>which is a popular variation on that like you can

0:36:34.120 --> 0:36:37.200
<v Speaker 2>think of like an emoji like the kind of wicked

0:36:37.239 --> 0:36:40.760
<v Speaker 2>and having, you know, like sort of dastardly fun, mischievous

0:36:41.560 --> 0:36:43.840
<v Speaker 2>emoji smiley that has sort of like a smirk in

0:36:44.239 --> 0:36:46.600
<v Speaker 2>the horns. I think we of hot topic in Gatzu.

0:36:46.960 --> 0:36:49.600
<v Speaker 2>Totally cool. Yeah. I actually remember when I was a kid,

0:36:49.600 --> 0:36:52.680
<v Speaker 2>a huge Smashing Pumpkins fan, and there was a Smashing

0:36:52.680 --> 0:36:57.160
<v Speaker 2>Pumpkins T shirt for that Melancholy the Infinite Sadness album

0:36:57.160 --> 0:36:59.279
<v Speaker 2>and it said the world is a vampire and it

0:36:59.360 --> 0:37:03.719
<v Speaker 2>had a kind of iconic smiley vampire with fangs and

0:37:03.760 --> 0:37:06.400
<v Speaker 2>little horns drawn in this exact same style. Yeah.

0:37:06.440 --> 0:37:10.480
<v Speaker 3>And Gannon, the investigator there, even he has a quote

0:37:10.480 --> 0:37:12.280
<v Speaker 3>I think we mentioned this, but he calls it an evil,

0:37:12.320 --> 0:37:13.359
<v Speaker 3>happy smiley man.

0:37:13.560 --> 0:37:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Right, And just for a second when you said Gannon,

0:37:15.520 --> 0:37:17.920
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking of the antagonist in Zelda.

0:37:18.360 --> 0:37:21.360
<v Speaker 2>I know me too different Gannon Kevin.

0:37:22.719 --> 0:37:25.720
<v Speaker 1>Gannon turned a new corner and he left High Rule

0:37:25.960 --> 0:37:28.719
<v Speaker 1>and became a p I because he's got a lot,

0:37:28.800 --> 0:37:30.960
<v Speaker 1>he's got a lot of skeletons, and he's a tortured

0:37:31.000 --> 0:37:31.480
<v Speaker 1>anti hero.

0:37:31.680 --> 0:37:31.839
<v Speaker 6>Wait.

0:37:33.000 --> 0:37:36.120
<v Speaker 3>The character, yeah, he's the main bad guy.

0:37:37.000 --> 0:37:39.359
<v Speaker 2>Was from from the beginning of the series.

0:37:40.080 --> 0:37:41.240
<v Speaker 3>From the ones that I played.

0:37:41.320 --> 0:37:43.920
<v Speaker 2>Yes, yeah, you're talking about like early Nintendo versions or

0:37:43.960 --> 0:37:46.600
<v Speaker 2>like more like recent ones like the Windwalkers. Yeah, for me,

0:37:46.640 --> 0:37:47.320
<v Speaker 2>it was the early.

0:37:47.200 --> 0:37:50.759
<v Speaker 1>Nintendo h but but but our Gannon in this story

0:37:50.840 --> 0:37:53.560
<v Speaker 1>is Gannon with G A ed N O N.

0:37:53.560 --> 0:37:56.480
<v Speaker 2>Spelling, yet ken in front of it and with a

0:37:56.600 --> 0:37:57.480
<v Speaker 2>Kevin in front of it.

0:37:58.360 --> 0:38:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Kevin's the important distinction there, really quick, another little pellet cleanser.

0:38:03.120 --> 0:38:04.680
<v Speaker 2>Did you hear they are? It seems like it's such

0:38:04.680 --> 0:38:08.560
<v Speaker 2>a missed opportunity. They're making a Zelda series. Yep, Yeah,

0:38:08.640 --> 0:38:10.720
<v Speaker 2>it's gonna be a stream took long enough, right, doesn't

0:38:10.719 --> 0:38:12.160
<v Speaker 2>it seem like that one is rife?

0:38:12.239 --> 0:38:14.359
<v Speaker 3>There was a Zelda series, right, I.

0:38:14.280 --> 0:38:16.880
<v Speaker 2>Don't think so. There may be a cartoon, but this

0:38:16.960 --> 0:38:20.919
<v Speaker 2>will be live action. Yeah, whoa really? Uh oh shit,

0:38:21.040 --> 0:38:23.160
<v Speaker 2>it's like one of the few video game adaptations that

0:38:23.160 --> 0:38:24.280
<v Speaker 2>actually could be really cool.

0:38:24.640 --> 0:38:27.719
<v Speaker 3>Yes, I do remember watching the legend of Zelda cartoons. Okay,

0:38:27.719 --> 0:38:30.680
<v Speaker 3>I just wanted to make sure I was remembering that correctly.

0:38:30.800 --> 0:38:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Matt, you had mentioned earlier that idea that the idea

0:38:36.200 --> 0:38:39.520
<v Speaker 1>of the differentiation between the icons, and again the idea

0:38:39.560 --> 0:38:42.800
<v Speaker 1>that there's a very common icon but from now, let's

0:38:42.840 --> 0:38:46.240
<v Speaker 1>just let's approach it this way. If this theory is true,

0:38:46.719 --> 0:38:50.839
<v Speaker 1>it is profoundly disturbing. And again, if it's true, there

0:38:50.880 --> 0:38:56.480
<v Speaker 1>are terrifying implications here. First, there's the possibility of multiple

0:38:56.800 --> 0:39:02.800
<v Speaker 1>killers working in concert. The reason that is disturbing is because,

0:39:02.800 --> 0:39:06.960
<v Speaker 1>despite what fiction would have you believe, it is incredibly

0:39:07.080 --> 0:39:12.640
<v Speaker 1>rare for investigators for anyone to find a proven case

0:39:12.920 --> 0:39:19.400
<v Speaker 1>of serial killers operate cooperating. Really, it's the kind of

0:39:20.680 --> 0:39:24.840
<v Speaker 1>mental disfigurement that leads someone to become a serial murderer,

0:39:25.360 --> 0:39:30.600
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really doesn't really predispose them to group work or

0:39:30.680 --> 0:39:34.360
<v Speaker 1>group projects. There are some, of course, there are exceptions there.

0:39:34.719 --> 0:39:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Lake and Ing would be one famous case rough Henry

0:39:38.840 --> 0:39:42.680
<v Speaker 1>Lee Lucas an oddis tool which you may remember from

0:39:42.719 --> 0:39:46.239
<v Speaker 1>our Hand of Death episodes, and he got a recent

0:39:46.280 --> 0:39:50.040
<v Speaker 1>mention under Samuel Little episode. So for that to exist,

0:39:50.160 --> 0:39:53.400
<v Speaker 1>for a group like that to exist, this would be

0:39:53.440 --> 0:39:56.920
<v Speaker 1>one of the first proven cases. The second terrifying implication

0:39:57.560 --> 0:40:00.040
<v Speaker 1>they have a long career, you know.

0:40:00.040 --> 0:40:02.400
<v Speaker 2>What I mean, almost twenty three years, right.

0:40:02.440 --> 0:40:05.399
<v Speaker 1>And that's just that's that we know about, right, that's

0:40:05.719 --> 0:40:10.160
<v Speaker 1>just assuming what Gannon and d'Arte have found is legit.

0:40:10.920 --> 0:40:14.480
<v Speaker 1>The third is, if you think about it, this is

0:40:14.600 --> 0:40:20.319
<v Speaker 1>technically organized crime at that point, because it denotes a

0:40:20.400 --> 0:40:26.840
<v Speaker 1>level of organization that serial killers have not been proven

0:40:26.840 --> 0:40:29.640
<v Speaker 1>to have. Lake and Ing weren't doing this. Lucas and

0:40:29.719 --> 0:40:35.759
<v Speaker 1>Toole certainly were not. In fact, Gannon has described this

0:40:35.960 --> 0:40:44.160
<v Speaker 1>as a a nationwide group that functions in terms of cells,

0:40:44.360 --> 0:40:48.600
<v Speaker 1>similar to a terrorist group. The weird thing about that

0:40:48.719 --> 0:40:53.800
<v Speaker 1>is it is possible for it is possible for people

0:40:53.840 --> 0:40:57.560
<v Speaker 1>to operate in a decentralized way like this just by

0:40:57.640 --> 0:41:02.480
<v Speaker 1>using Internet forums to communicate, similar to the what is

0:41:02.520 --> 0:41:06.520
<v Speaker 1>the thing with old Dutch? The Lake City Quiet pills?

0:41:06.760 --> 0:41:08.279
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, similar to that.

0:41:08.640 --> 0:41:11.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's very easy to start a group and

0:41:11.600 --> 0:41:15.239
<v Speaker 1>if you're careful with your language, to communicate things from

0:41:15.320 --> 0:41:18.960
<v Speaker 1>point A to point B without ever pinging law enforcement,

0:41:19.080 --> 0:41:21.160
<v Speaker 1>you know what I mean, or anyone else, or anyone

0:41:21.200 --> 0:41:22.759
<v Speaker 1>else that you don't want them to know.

0:41:23.000 --> 0:41:24.880
<v Speaker 3>You could do it right under the nose of somebody.

0:41:25.000 --> 0:41:27.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, have you ever gone to a form and

0:41:27.160 --> 0:41:30.520
<v Speaker 1>found some stuff that seemed like it was a code?

0:41:31.280 --> 0:41:34.319
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. No, Okay, all right, well, I don't

0:41:34.360 --> 0:41:36.360
<v Speaker 2>want to put you in a bad spot there or

0:41:36.400 --> 0:41:41.319
<v Speaker 2>a Facebook group, right, right, right, But let's say it's

0:41:41.320 --> 0:41:41.760
<v Speaker 2>all true.

0:41:42.200 --> 0:41:46.000
<v Speaker 1>If this is all true, then that means those implications

0:41:46.040 --> 0:41:49.879
<v Speaker 1>are necessarily true. It logically follows, and then the next

0:41:49.960 --> 0:41:54.520
<v Speaker 1>question is why aren't the authorities doing more? Well, that's

0:41:54.560 --> 0:42:00.200
<v Speaker 1>because it's a controversial theory and not everyone agrees. And

0:42:00.239 --> 0:42:04.240
<v Speaker 1>what's happening here we'll dive into the problems with the narrative.

0:42:04.360 --> 0:42:15.120
<v Speaker 1>After a word from our sponsors, we're back. So, as

0:42:15.120 --> 0:42:20.279
<v Speaker 1>we've said, there are problems with this narrative. This exploring

0:42:20.280 --> 0:42:23.000
<v Speaker 1>these problems, of course, should in no way be interpreted

0:42:23.080 --> 0:42:26.480
<v Speaker 1>as disrespectful to the families, or the victims or the

0:42:26.480 --> 0:42:31.280
<v Speaker 1>investigators involved. We're just looking at all the different explorations.

0:42:31.640 --> 0:42:35.040
<v Speaker 1>There's a nonprofit group called the Center for Homicide Research,

0:42:35.360 --> 0:42:40.240
<v Speaker 1>and they attempted to scientifically debunk the smiley face murders

0:42:40.280 --> 0:42:46.120
<v Speaker 1>or killers theory. They came up with. They came up

0:42:46.160 --> 0:42:48.359
<v Speaker 1>with a They had a report that you can find

0:42:48.400 --> 0:42:53.919
<v Speaker 1>online that has a laundry list of reasons why they

0:42:54.000 --> 0:43:00.880
<v Speaker 1>think this narrative described by Gannon doesn't hold water. And honestly,

0:43:00.920 --> 0:43:04.360
<v Speaker 1>they they have some good points, like we do not

0:43:04.560 --> 0:43:08.680
<v Speaker 1>have solid evidence that the smiley faces were drawn at

0:43:08.719 --> 0:43:11.680
<v Speaker 1>the same time the bodies were put in the water, right.

0:43:11.680 --> 0:43:16.560
<v Speaker 3>That makes sense. They also know that graffiti exists everywhere,

0:43:17.360 --> 0:43:19.759
<v Speaker 3>especially I mean if you think about a place that

0:43:19.880 --> 0:43:22.759
<v Speaker 3>isn't visited a whole bunch, even if it's down by

0:43:23.280 --> 0:43:27.040
<v Speaker 3>a river or somewhere, you know, you will find graffiti.

0:43:27.080 --> 0:43:29.360
<v Speaker 2>Well, that's where your run of the mill novice tagger

0:43:29.480 --> 0:43:31.239
<v Speaker 2>is going to cut their teeth is out of like

0:43:31.280 --> 0:43:33.920
<v Speaker 2>you know, the public eye, like under a bridge, or

0:43:34.040 --> 0:43:36.799
<v Speaker 2>on a retaining wall like around like the La River

0:43:36.880 --> 0:43:39.760
<v Speaker 2>for example, or any other body of water that's in

0:43:39.400 --> 0:43:42.600
<v Speaker 2>a municipal type area, you know, like up here, like

0:43:42.840 --> 0:43:45.239
<v Speaker 2>in New York City, where several of these cases took place.

0:43:45.320 --> 0:43:47.040
<v Speaker 3>Well, they also make the exact same point that we

0:43:47.080 --> 0:43:50.080
<v Speaker 3>were just talking about, how ubiquitous smiley faces just are

0:43:50.280 --> 0:43:51.239
<v Speaker 3>as a symbol and.

0:43:51.120 --> 0:43:54.680
<v Speaker 2>What a dashed off thing a kid might do. You know,

0:43:54.880 --> 0:43:57.759
<v Speaker 2>I want to be a graffiti artist. You know what's

0:43:57.800 --> 0:43:59.279
<v Speaker 2>the first thing that's going to come to mind. The

0:43:59.320 --> 0:44:02.720
<v Speaker 2>most simple iconographic thing you could do is that circle,

0:44:02.760 --> 0:44:05.080
<v Speaker 2>two dots and a half moon. You know, it's it

0:44:05.360 --> 0:44:08.359
<v Speaker 2>takes very little forethought, the easiest thing in the world

0:44:08.400 --> 0:44:09.959
<v Speaker 2>just to dash off from the top of your head,

0:44:10.040 --> 0:44:10.239
<v Speaker 2>you know.

0:44:10.320 --> 0:44:12.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and it also pretty clearly doesn't seem to be

0:44:12.880 --> 0:44:17.279
<v Speaker 3>a you know, a gang sign because it's not matching, right,

0:44:17.320 --> 0:44:20.919
<v Speaker 3>they're so dissimilar. But they also noticed that that other

0:44:21.000 --> 0:44:25.439
<v Speaker 3>word that we mentioned earlier in Sinewa, since Sinewa, they

0:44:26.120 --> 0:44:29.480
<v Speaker 3>they note that that is a common use of graffiti,

0:44:29.520 --> 0:44:32.319
<v Speaker 3>a common thing to be written, so it appears to

0:44:32.360 --> 0:44:34.520
<v Speaker 3>be also a red herring. They're saying both the smiley

0:44:34.520 --> 0:44:35.439
<v Speaker 3>face and that her.

0:44:35.360 --> 0:44:37.200
<v Speaker 2>Red hearing then made the point that, you know how

0:44:37.239 --> 0:44:41.240
<v Speaker 2>a lot of you'll see single words written on overpass bridges,

0:44:41.280 --> 0:44:45.560
<v Speaker 2>et cetera. That is typically a signature of a particular

0:44:45.680 --> 0:44:48.520
<v Speaker 2>tagger or a graffiti artist. So since Sinewa could be

0:44:49.080 --> 0:44:52.600
<v Speaker 2>one individual who travels around, maybe a train kid or

0:44:52.600 --> 0:44:55.080
<v Speaker 2>something who travels around and just does this tag.

0:44:55.239 --> 0:44:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Or it could or it could be multiple people who

0:44:58.120 --> 0:45:01.360
<v Speaker 1>think that's a cool name, super creepy sounding, right, you know,

0:45:01.480 --> 0:45:07.279
<v Speaker 1>because graft heads and painters they get they take that

0:45:07.400 --> 0:45:11.719
<v Speaker 1>name stuff very seriously, absolutely, you know it. Also, it

0:45:11.760 --> 0:45:15.919
<v Speaker 1>also reminds me of one of my favorite taggers over

0:45:15.920 --> 0:45:19.160
<v Speaker 1>the years in Atlanta. There was for a time a

0:45:19.239 --> 0:45:24.280
<v Speaker 1>guy or girl or person who did the tag goat Ravisher.

0:45:24.640 --> 0:45:27.799
<v Speaker 1>And they didn't do it in a stylistic way. They

0:45:27.840 --> 0:45:30.560
<v Speaker 1>did a really bad job, so bad that you would

0:45:30.560 --> 0:45:33.080
<v Speaker 1>think it's on purpose. They it just looked like they

0:45:33.080 --> 0:45:36.960
<v Speaker 1>have found something, and in shaky block letters, spray painted

0:45:37.239 --> 0:45:39.919
<v Speaker 1>the goat Ravisher, and they were all over little five

0:45:40.000 --> 0:45:43.400
<v Speaker 1>points they had. They had some spots on the bridge

0:45:43.600 --> 0:45:45.960
<v Speaker 1>right outside of our office, and I kept.

0:45:45.800 --> 0:45:49.080
<v Speaker 2>Thinking, man, I love I love this.

0:45:50.400 --> 0:45:52.520
<v Speaker 1>In my head, there's always some weird college doom like

0:45:52.520 --> 0:45:55.200
<v Speaker 1>I love this dude's energy because it was real. It

0:45:55.280 --> 0:45:59.120
<v Speaker 1>was right next to really really nice ornate tags and pieces,

0:45:59.440 --> 0:46:01.799
<v Speaker 1>and this guy would come by and be like, oh,

0:46:01.800 --> 0:46:05.200
<v Speaker 1>that probably took them like six hours. Anyway, the goat

0:46:05.280 --> 0:46:06.479
<v Speaker 1>Ravisher strikes again.

0:46:06.560 --> 0:46:08.440
<v Speaker 2>I also, like, you know, I also love the idea

0:46:08.480 --> 0:46:11.279
<v Speaker 2>that this person is clearly romancing the goat. You know,

0:46:11.480 --> 0:46:14.160
<v Speaker 2>it's really like, you know, whining and dining the goat.

0:46:14.160 --> 0:46:16.239
<v Speaker 3>I'm pretty sure it's like greatest of all time.

0:46:16.280 --> 0:46:18.440
<v Speaker 2>I think it's pretty good. So it's the greatest of

0:46:18.480 --> 0:46:19.320
<v Speaker 2>all time Ravisher.

0:46:19.880 --> 0:46:23.279
<v Speaker 1>So goat Ravisher. If you're listening, nice work man, miss

0:46:23.480 --> 0:46:25.360
<v Speaker 1>on the streets. Yeah, we see you, we see you.

0:46:26.000 --> 0:46:29.799
<v Speaker 2>But Sinswa is a since Cinewa that's s I N

0:46:29.880 --> 0:46:34.239
<v Speaker 2>s I N I w A is also common graffiti.

0:46:34.400 --> 0:46:38.680
<v Speaker 1>So this nonprofit Center for Homicide Research dismisses that as

0:46:38.680 --> 0:46:39.400
<v Speaker 1>a red herring.

0:46:39.680 --> 0:46:40.920
<v Speaker 2>A lot of people I've never seen it.

0:46:41.000 --> 0:46:42.600
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people who are yeah, it's not common

0:46:42.640 --> 0:46:44.560
<v Speaker 1>here in Atlanta right. A lot of people who are

0:46:44.600 --> 0:46:50.680
<v Speaker 1>proponents of the theory feel like this list is somewhat dismissive.

0:46:51.160 --> 0:46:56.960
<v Speaker 1>But they raise another great point, which is estimating where

0:46:57.000 --> 0:46:59.880
<v Speaker 1>the body might have entered the water. If it's you know,

0:47:00.400 --> 0:47:03.719
<v Speaker 1>X number of yards up or even a mile up

0:47:04.000 --> 0:47:09.160
<v Speaker 1>river from where the body was discovered, it's just that

0:47:09.200 --> 0:47:12.799
<v Speaker 1>it's an estimation. It can be it can be an

0:47:12.920 --> 0:47:15.960
<v Speaker 1>estimation with a high degree of sophistication, but it's still

0:47:16.040 --> 0:47:17.920
<v Speaker 1>it's never going to be a definite, or it's it's

0:47:17.960 --> 0:47:19.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna be rare for it to be a definite. There

0:47:19.520 --> 0:47:23.360
<v Speaker 1>will always be that question. They also disagree with Gannon's

0:47:23.400 --> 0:47:26.240
<v Speaker 1>findings on McNeil. They say there's no evidence of victim

0:47:26.320 --> 0:47:30.320
<v Speaker 1>trauma and the vast majority of recovered remains don't show

0:47:30.360 --> 0:47:34.880
<v Speaker 1>that the victims were recipients of trauma, that they didn't

0:47:35.040 --> 0:47:39.440
<v Speaker 1>have some you know, egregious signs of a beating or something.

0:47:39.880 --> 0:47:44.000
<v Speaker 1>They also point out that homicidal drowning is incredibly rare.

0:47:44.719 --> 0:47:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Again this, this is this, This is a statement you

0:47:48.600 --> 0:47:50.320
<v Speaker 1>could you could pick a bone with. You could have

0:47:50.400 --> 0:47:54.480
<v Speaker 1>a problem with this one, because they're saying that homicidal

0:47:54.600 --> 0:47:57.480
<v Speaker 1>drownings account for two tenths of one percent of all

0:47:57.560 --> 0:48:03.120
<v Speaker 1>US killings point two percent. How that number has to

0:48:03.160 --> 0:48:07.759
<v Speaker 1>be based on the very rare proven cases of homicide

0:48:07.800 --> 0:48:10.719
<v Speaker 1>by drowning, and to be a proven case of homicide

0:48:10.719 --> 0:48:14.959
<v Speaker 1>by drowning, remember that entire checklist of things that investigators

0:48:14.960 --> 0:48:18.120
<v Speaker 1>have to go through first. So odds are I mean,

0:48:18.160 --> 0:48:20.759
<v Speaker 1>there's no question about odds. Are more people have died

0:48:20.800 --> 0:48:23.640
<v Speaker 1>by homicidal drowning than the official numbers would suggest.

0:48:23.840 --> 0:48:27.160
<v Speaker 2>Can we double back really quickly to Gannon's obsession and

0:48:27.200 --> 0:48:30.880
<v Speaker 2>where you think this? What the seeds of this were?

0:48:31.120 --> 0:48:32.560
<v Speaker 2>It was that one particular case.

0:48:32.800 --> 0:48:35.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, of the family, that's it, right, family, that case.

0:48:35.280 --> 0:48:38.920
<v Speaker 3>I mean think about that, I think just think about that.

0:48:39.040 --> 0:48:42.320
<v Speaker 3>Somebody comes to you and you know you're working, let's say,

0:48:42.360 --> 0:48:46.600
<v Speaker 3>with them for some reason and in some ways working

0:48:46.640 --> 0:48:50.320
<v Speaker 3>for them as a public servant, as a part of

0:48:50.360 --> 0:48:53.359
<v Speaker 3>the NYPD, trying to find their son. It's because it's

0:48:53.360 --> 0:48:55.640
<v Speaker 3>a member. It's a missing person's case for him in

0:48:55.680 --> 0:48:58.680
<v Speaker 3>the beginning, so he's learning everything he possibly can. I'm

0:48:58.719 --> 0:49:02.200
<v Speaker 3>just this is me projecting to Kevin Gannon, but he's

0:49:02.640 --> 0:49:04.920
<v Speaker 3>he's so invested in that family, aid in this person

0:49:04.960 --> 0:49:07.560
<v Speaker 3>that he's trying to locate for days and days and days,

0:49:08.239 --> 0:49:12.000
<v Speaker 3>and then all of a sudden shows up dead and drowned.

0:49:12.640 --> 0:49:15.600
<v Speaker 3>And I mean, you can imagine the effect that I

0:49:15.600 --> 0:49:18.280
<v Speaker 3>would have on you if the family is like pleading

0:49:18.320 --> 0:49:21.080
<v Speaker 3>with you to figure out what happened.

0:49:20.800 --> 0:49:23.399
<v Speaker 2>You absolutely can And this is why I could never

0:49:23.480 --> 0:49:25.560
<v Speaker 2>do that job. But does this not seem like a

0:49:25.600 --> 0:49:29.239
<v Speaker 2>classic example of someone getting a little too close to

0:49:30.000 --> 0:49:32.600
<v Speaker 2>what they're investigating. You think he got lost in the case,

0:49:32.640 --> 0:49:34.400
<v Speaker 2>and got lost in the case, and got lost in

0:49:34.440 --> 0:49:38.400
<v Speaker 2>the emotion of it all and needed to build another

0:49:38.480 --> 0:49:41.480
<v Speaker 2>narrative and maybe was looking for things that weren't necessarily there,

0:49:41.520 --> 0:49:44.400
<v Speaker 2>because when you see this list all gathered together like this,

0:49:44.520 --> 0:49:47.160
<v Speaker 2>it really does seem like he was making quite the

0:49:47.280 --> 0:49:51.000
<v Speaker 2>leap of judgment. Well, that's that's the question.

0:49:51.200 --> 0:49:53.600
<v Speaker 3>So there's more I'm gonna say, We're gonna bring up later.

0:49:53.800 --> 0:49:57.880
<v Speaker 3>There's there's one or two major things that make me

0:49:58.080 --> 0:50:00.520
<v Speaker 3>lean a little closer to thinking their something going on.

0:50:00.560 --> 0:50:02.880
<v Speaker 3>But let's continue on this list of why it's probably not,

0:50:02.920 --> 0:50:03.959
<v Speaker 3>at least according.

0:50:03.600 --> 0:50:03.920
<v Speaker 2>To this one.

0:50:04.000 --> 0:50:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Right, well, the idea that water washes away all evidence

0:50:08.480 --> 0:50:12.000
<v Speaker 1>is somewhat of a myth or misleading. They argue that

0:50:12.040 --> 0:50:16.160
<v Speaker 1>the drownings do not fit a serial killer motive. I

0:50:16.160 --> 0:50:20.399
<v Speaker 1>do also want to point out that I this might

0:50:20.440 --> 0:50:23.200
<v Speaker 1>be a hot take, but I don't think Harvey Rossball,

0:50:23.400 --> 0:50:27.240
<v Speaker 1>the inventor of the smiley face, is directly related.

0:50:27.800 --> 0:50:29.480
<v Speaker 2>You know, I think his hands are cleaning this one,

0:50:29.520 --> 0:50:31.040
<v Speaker 2>pretty sure. Yes.

0:50:31.640 --> 0:50:37.839
<v Speaker 1>And then they also have confessions of confessions of people

0:50:37.880 --> 0:50:41.360
<v Speaker 1>who are incarcerated that are saying something was a murder,

0:50:41.640 --> 0:50:45.960
<v Speaker 1>right or saying that saying that they saw something, they

0:50:46.000 --> 0:50:51.680
<v Speaker 1>witness something leading up to one of these disappearances. The

0:50:51.719 --> 0:50:56.719
<v Speaker 1>problem with that is that it's you have to be

0:50:56.760 --> 0:50:59.960
<v Speaker 1>really skeptical when you hear the confessions of inmates. Right

0:51:00.080 --> 0:51:03.840
<v Speaker 1>the again, the Lucas conundrum, right with Henry Lee Lucas

0:51:03.880 --> 0:51:07.040
<v Speaker 1>confessing to hundreds of murders he could not have possibly done,

0:51:07.160 --> 0:51:11.360
<v Speaker 1>not have physically accomplished, in exchange for you know, perks

0:51:11.600 --> 0:51:12.399
<v Speaker 1>in lifeline Bob.

0:51:12.400 --> 0:51:14.000
<v Speaker 3>Even goes back to the same mule little case.

0:51:14.239 --> 0:51:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, oh, absolutely yeah, which is the whole reason we

0:51:17.000 --> 0:51:21.759
<v Speaker 1>found out about America's most prolific serial killer. So they

0:51:21.760 --> 0:51:26.080
<v Speaker 1>also say that, in their opinion, the general environment of

0:51:26.120 --> 0:51:31.799
<v Speaker 1>the disappearances sound like they're more related to accidental or

0:51:31.880 --> 0:51:36.680
<v Speaker 1>unintentional drownings. They occurred at night, they were in areas

0:51:36.719 --> 0:51:40.719
<v Speaker 1>not far from bars or college towns, and they said that,

0:51:40.800 --> 0:51:43.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, people who have been drinking who stagger away

0:51:43.000 --> 0:51:46.160
<v Speaker 1>from bars are more likely to walk or stagger downhill

0:51:46.400 --> 0:51:50.520
<v Speaker 1>because it's easier. I get that, but that's like, this

0:51:50.560 --> 0:51:54.160
<v Speaker 1>is not an open sandbox game when when you're walking

0:51:54.280 --> 0:51:57.759
<v Speaker 1>home from anywhere, you have a specific direction, and if

0:51:57.760 --> 0:51:59.799
<v Speaker 1>it's uphill, you still have to go uphill. I don't

0:51:59.800 --> 0:52:03.359
<v Speaker 1>think anybody is like, ah, my apartments at the top

0:52:03.400 --> 0:52:06.080
<v Speaker 1>of that hill, so I guess I'm going the other way.

0:52:06.560 --> 0:52:07.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:52:07.440 --> 0:52:10.960
<v Speaker 1>And then they also say that, you know, rivers also

0:52:11.040 --> 0:52:14.160
<v Speaker 1>are downhill, and there are only a few blocks away

0:52:14.160 --> 0:52:18.400
<v Speaker 1>from the bars where these cases occur, and that there's

0:52:18.800 --> 0:52:21.680
<v Speaker 1>there there's a dearth of barriers. There aren't very many

0:52:21.719 --> 0:52:26.279
<v Speaker 1>fences or railings, so intoxicated people who are having tough

0:52:26.320 --> 0:52:30.839
<v Speaker 1>time coordinating their ambulation might just slip and fall.

0:52:30.920 --> 0:52:33.160
<v Speaker 2>That is a really fancy way of saying walking. I

0:52:33.200 --> 0:52:36.160
<v Speaker 2>love it. Well, yeah, I just said walking so many times.

0:52:36.160 --> 0:52:38.200
<v Speaker 2>It's fair. No, it's great, you're a wordsmith.

0:52:38.360 --> 0:52:41.279
<v Speaker 3>It just stinks because they're saying, look, drunk people, when

0:52:41.280 --> 0:52:45.600
<v Speaker 3>they're super super drunk, are just gonna stumble away from

0:52:45.600 --> 0:52:47.880
<v Speaker 3>that bar and maybe fall down the hill land in

0:52:47.920 --> 0:52:49.399
<v Speaker 3>a river because there's no barrier there.

0:52:49.480 --> 0:52:51.359
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, no, I love that point about it being

0:52:51.400 --> 0:52:54.520
<v Speaker 2>downhill because that's just gravity's gonna like take its course,

0:52:54.600 --> 0:52:55.160
<v Speaker 2>you know what I mean.

0:52:55.280 --> 0:52:58.680
<v Speaker 3>But these people were missing for a period of time

0:52:59.000 --> 0:53:02.239
<v Speaker 3>from a week to who you know, a month, in

0:53:02.320 --> 0:53:03.480
<v Speaker 3>a quarter or something.

0:53:03.520 --> 0:53:03.960
<v Speaker 2>It's like.

0:53:05.400 --> 0:53:07.000
<v Speaker 3>And I take issue with it, but it's okay.

0:53:07.440 --> 0:53:09.759
<v Speaker 2>It feels a little victim blame me, right, Yeah, no, no,

0:53:10.360 --> 0:53:11.839
<v Speaker 2>I see your point there. I see your point there.

0:53:12.000 --> 0:53:13.320
<v Speaker 2>Map I agree.

0:53:13.320 --> 0:53:16.040
<v Speaker 1>And they also say, you know, saying that only males

0:53:16.040 --> 0:53:19.320
<v Speaker 1>are drowning in these cases, does it necessarily mean a

0:53:19.400 --> 0:53:23.719
<v Speaker 1>serial killers evolved, which is true. They also say that

0:53:24.360 --> 0:53:28.360
<v Speaker 1>in Wisconsin, particularly the town of Lacrosse, foot patrols and

0:53:28.400 --> 0:53:34.480
<v Speaker 1>police have stopped over fifty plus drunk people walking essentially

0:53:34.880 --> 0:53:37.080
<v Speaker 1>and they've stopped them because they were about to walk

0:53:37.120 --> 0:53:40.080
<v Speaker 1>into the area where the river is late at night

0:53:40.400 --> 0:53:42.440
<v Speaker 1>and there are no barriers that can slip and fall.

0:53:42.440 --> 0:53:44.440
<v Speaker 2>Or into traffic. I mean, you know, who knows. There's

0:53:44.440 --> 0:53:46.720
<v Speaker 2>any number of things. But again, not no victim blaming

0:53:46.760 --> 0:53:48.399
<v Speaker 2>here at all. I do want to point out too

0:53:48.440 --> 0:53:51.360
<v Speaker 2>that I maybe got this a little wrong early on

0:53:51.400 --> 0:53:54.320
<v Speaker 2>when I was leaning on the idea of killing someone

0:53:54.360 --> 0:53:57.279
<v Speaker 2>by drowning them is not really a sure thing, right, Like,

0:53:57.280 --> 0:53:59.239
<v Speaker 2>if you're just pushing someone into a river, like, how

0:53:59.280 --> 0:54:01.680
<v Speaker 2>do you know they're not just gonna swim away or

0:54:01.960 --> 0:54:04.400
<v Speaker 2>you know, get out. But part of this theory is

0:54:04.440 --> 0:54:07.560
<v Speaker 2>the idea that they were drugged and potentially killed in

0:54:07.680 --> 0:54:10.759
<v Speaker 2>advance of being thrown into the river. That's that's part of.

0:54:10.680 --> 0:54:14.120
<v Speaker 3>It, or you know what I mean, Yes, I wholeheartedly agree. Yeah,

0:54:14.160 --> 0:54:16.399
<v Speaker 3>and that point is one of the things that bugs me.

0:54:16.880 --> 0:54:20.120
<v Speaker 2>And so but there's no evidence of that though, right.

0:54:20.000 --> 0:54:22.000
<v Speaker 3>There's some there's some weird stuff going on. We're gonna

0:54:22.000 --> 0:54:22.279
<v Speaker 3>talk there.

0:54:22.320 --> 0:54:24.160
<v Speaker 2>There's some weird stuff. I want to hit this.

0:54:24.239 --> 0:54:28.120
<v Speaker 1>They also report on the actions of law enforcement in

0:54:28.200 --> 0:54:35.360
<v Speaker 1>the same town, saying that they've they've documented the circumstances

0:54:35.400 --> 0:54:39.120
<v Speaker 1>of at least twenty different people who would have drowned

0:54:39.360 --> 0:54:43.200
<v Speaker 1>but have survived. And they said, you know, in every case,

0:54:43.239 --> 0:54:45.000
<v Speaker 1>we tried to figure out what got them to that

0:54:45.040 --> 0:54:48.399
<v Speaker 1>point where they almost drowned. Most of the time these

0:54:48.400 --> 0:54:52.839
<v Speaker 1>would be accidents. Sometimes they were dares because college kids, right,

0:54:53.040 --> 0:54:56.240
<v Speaker 1>we were all we were all there before, or they

0:54:56.719 --> 0:55:00.800
<v Speaker 1>were attempting to commit suicide, or they were again this

0:55:00.880 --> 0:55:04.440
<v Speaker 1>is the most victim blamey thing they were involved in

0:55:04.600 --> 0:55:07.000
<v Speaker 1>aspects of auto assassination.

0:55:07.239 --> 0:55:08.960
<v Speaker 2>This is a first for me on this term, but

0:55:09.160 --> 0:55:09.840
<v Speaker 2>I get it.

0:55:09.840 --> 0:55:14.160
<v Speaker 3>It's it's Darwin's h what is it? The Darwin Award,

0:55:14.239 --> 0:55:17.439
<v Speaker 3>that's what that's what auto assassination is a Darwin Award. Yeah,

0:55:17.560 --> 0:55:21.000
<v Speaker 3>doing something so stupid or like, you know, reckless, that's

0:55:21.040 --> 0:55:21.560
<v Speaker 3>what they're saying.

0:55:21.560 --> 0:55:25.799
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's also just a lifestyle that involves utter disregard

0:55:25.920 --> 0:55:30.479
<v Speaker 2>for one's own longevity or personal well being, your safety, right, Yeah,

0:55:30.520 --> 0:55:33.000
<v Speaker 2>like you just throw all caution to the wind, and

0:55:33.040 --> 0:55:35.360
<v Speaker 2>you clearly are not looking out for yourself.

0:55:35.680 --> 0:55:40.479
<v Speaker 1>People who weren't searching for a victim blamey euphemism would

0:55:40.480 --> 0:55:42.040
<v Speaker 1>have just said self destructive.

0:55:42.239 --> 0:55:42.719
<v Speaker 2>There you go.

0:55:42.920 --> 0:55:45.440
<v Speaker 1>And I think sometimes you know, as the guy who

0:55:45.440 --> 0:55:47.239
<v Speaker 1>just said ambulation a few minutes ago.

0:55:47.520 --> 0:55:49.640
<v Speaker 2>We have to be careful, especially.

0:55:49.280 --> 0:55:52.680
<v Speaker 1>In law enforcement reports or government reports, when you start

0:55:52.680 --> 0:55:56.280
<v Speaker 1>to see the jargon words, you know, when you start

0:55:56.280 --> 0:55:59.200
<v Speaker 1>to hear I don't know, it's like it's the reason

0:55:59.239 --> 0:56:03.600
<v Speaker 1>that sixful cults always go into acronyms. Have you guys

0:56:03.600 --> 0:56:09.440
<v Speaker 1>ever read behind the scenes, like actual leaked scientology documents.

0:56:09.840 --> 0:56:13.040
<v Speaker 1>They're riddled with acronyms. They're like military writing from the

0:56:13.160 --> 0:56:14.000
<v Speaker 1>nineteen fifties.

0:56:14.160 --> 0:56:17.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I've watched all of George Carlin's specials, and in

0:56:17.080 --> 0:56:19.160
<v Speaker 3>every one of them he's always got a great section

0:56:19.600 --> 0:56:22.920
<v Speaker 3>on euphemisms and how we like whitewash everything.

0:56:23.239 --> 0:56:25.839
<v Speaker 2>Ac Yeah, you're right. It is a clinical way of

0:56:25.880 --> 0:56:29.719
<v Speaker 2>referring to something that potentially is a little darker. Or

0:56:29.800 --> 0:56:32.640
<v Speaker 2>it's a way of maybe normalizing concepts that are a

0:56:32.680 --> 0:56:36.040
<v Speaker 2>little more outlandish or a little more troubling by giving

0:56:36.080 --> 0:56:39.600
<v Speaker 2>them a nice pithy you know, like unsub for example,

0:56:39.640 --> 0:56:42.960
<v Speaker 2>that's the unidentified subject in a murder investigation. When you

0:56:43.000 --> 0:56:47.279
<v Speaker 2>say unsub, it sounds a lot more digestible, maybe, you.

0:56:47.200 --> 0:56:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Know, sure, yeah, or conspiracy theorist. That way, you can

0:56:51.239 --> 0:56:54.279
<v Speaker 1>ignore what kind of drug money in international bank is

0:56:54.280 --> 0:56:56.799
<v Speaker 1>moving whoa, whoa.

0:56:56.520 --> 0:56:58.960
<v Speaker 2>The old thought terminating cliche exactly.

0:56:59.120 --> 0:57:01.640
<v Speaker 1>But these points they also say, as I think we

0:57:01.680 --> 0:57:05.960
<v Speaker 1>mentioned earlier, that presence of GHB in a victim's body

0:57:06.000 --> 0:57:09.080
<v Speaker 1>does not indicate whether they were maliciously drugged or whether

0:57:09.120 --> 0:57:12.919
<v Speaker 1>they did it themselves. That's true if we're exercising skepticism.

0:57:13.680 --> 0:57:19.200
<v Speaker 1>But they also say, we don't have enough evidence to

0:57:19.240 --> 0:57:22.800
<v Speaker 1>say that they were drugged by offenders prior to their abduction.

0:57:23.000 --> 0:57:26.560
<v Speaker 1>These points have some validity, but let's just let's talk

0:57:26.600 --> 0:57:29.880
<v Speaker 1>about Let's talk about the other side, because there are

0:57:29.960 --> 0:57:34.440
<v Speaker 1>several things here that are incredibly I don't want to

0:57:34.440 --> 0:57:37.720
<v Speaker 1>say they're deal breakers, but they're problematic for anyone who

0:57:37.720 --> 0:57:42.080
<v Speaker 1>thinks that Gannon is completely just reading tea leaves. And

0:57:42.240 --> 0:57:44.480
<v Speaker 1>the first one is the one I keep coming back to,

0:57:45.200 --> 0:57:48.680
<v Speaker 1>is the length of time, Like you said, Matt, the

0:57:48.760 --> 0:57:51.200
<v Speaker 1>length of time between when they were last seen and

0:57:51.240 --> 0:57:55.800
<v Speaker 1>when they were discovered. We didn't have great statistics that

0:57:55.800 --> 0:57:56.520
<v Speaker 1>we could dig up.

0:57:56.720 --> 0:57:58.720
<v Speaker 2>Love to read them. If you are listening, you can

0:57:58.720 --> 0:57:59.160
<v Speaker 2>find them.

0:57:59.440 --> 0:58:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Have great systicks on how long on average it takes

0:58:03.520 --> 0:58:07.160
<v Speaker 1>to find the victim of the corpse of a drowning victim.

0:58:07.280 --> 0:58:10.400
<v Speaker 3>Right, yeah, well here's the deal for me. I'm just

0:58:10.440 --> 0:58:13.800
<v Speaker 3>gonna lay it out really quickly. In the Rolling Stones

0:58:13.880 --> 0:58:17.560
<v Speaker 3>article on this subject that I think it came out

0:58:17.560 --> 0:58:18.760
<v Speaker 3>in September.

0:58:18.200 --> 0:58:20.840
<v Speaker 2>Of last year, Yeah, September thirteenth.

0:58:20.440 --> 0:58:25.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, exactly, it names several victims. In particular, we talked

0:58:25.560 --> 0:58:29.160
<v Speaker 3>about Patrick Neil. If you go to this person William

0:58:29.280 --> 0:58:32.600
<v Speaker 3>Hurley that I don't think we actually mentioned on air here.

0:58:33.280 --> 0:58:35.640
<v Speaker 3>He was a guy who was hanging out of Boston

0:58:35.640 --> 0:58:38.800
<v Speaker 3>Bruins game in two thousand and nine October two thousand

0:58:38.800 --> 0:58:41.360
<v Speaker 3>and nine, and his cell phone battery was really low.

0:58:41.880 --> 0:58:46.640
<v Speaker 3>He's he calls his girlfriend drunkenly, he's very intoxicated and says, hey,

0:58:46.680 --> 0:58:48.840
<v Speaker 3>come pick me up. She goes out to meet him

0:58:48.920 --> 0:58:51.640
<v Speaker 3>and he's gone. He's not there. She can't get in

0:58:51.680 --> 0:58:54.440
<v Speaker 3>touch with him. Six days later, his body's found in

0:58:54.480 --> 0:58:58.640
<v Speaker 3>the Charles River and his cell phone is smashed nearby.

0:58:58.440 --> 0:59:03.479
<v Speaker 3>They recover that, like, okay, So that's one right, that's

0:59:03.520 --> 0:59:06.720
<v Speaker 3>one instance. Here we talked about McNeil.

0:59:07.200 --> 0:59:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Dakota James, Yes, Dakota James. So Dakota James is interesting

0:59:13.600 --> 0:59:19.240
<v Speaker 1>in that if we link him to the Smiley face theory.

0:59:19.920 --> 0:59:23.560
<v Speaker 1>He's a case where something almost went wrong, where something

0:59:23.600 --> 0:59:28.760
<v Speaker 1>did go wrong for the criminals, because on December fifteenth,

0:59:28.800 --> 0:59:32.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty sixteen, he called his friend Shelley. He said he

0:59:32.960 --> 0:59:37.000
<v Speaker 1>was terrified. He was wandering around Pittsburgh. He was cold,

0:59:37.080 --> 0:59:41.040
<v Speaker 1>he was he didn't know where he was. He asked

0:59:41.120 --> 0:59:43.880
<v Speaker 1>that he couldn't remember what happened. He just sort of

0:59:43.960 --> 0:59:47.120
<v Speaker 1>came to and he was walking around the area and

0:59:47.160 --> 0:59:50.160
<v Speaker 1>the police wouldn't help him. So his friend freaks out.

0:59:50.200 --> 0:59:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Did he get mugged? Was he in an accident?

0:59:53.560 --> 0:59:55.640
<v Speaker 2>Where are you? I'll come find you.

0:59:55.720 --> 1:00:01.120
<v Speaker 1>And then she actually does find him, and he's not

1:00:01.240 --> 1:00:03.920
<v Speaker 1>where he said he would be. She was able to

1:00:03.960 --> 1:00:07.520
<v Speaker 1>use her phone to find him, and then when she

1:00:07.640 --> 1:00:11.680
<v Speaker 1>got there, she saw a dark suv in the wrong lane,

1:00:11.720 --> 1:00:14.720
<v Speaker 1>facing the wrong direction. He was walking out of the hotel,

1:00:14.760 --> 1:00:19.960
<v Speaker 1>headed toward the suv and she caught him. She yelled

1:00:19.960 --> 1:00:22.400
<v Speaker 1>at him, hey, I'm over here, and he goes to

1:00:22.440 --> 1:00:25.080
<v Speaker 1>his car. He goes to her car, got in with

1:00:25.120 --> 1:00:29.720
<v Speaker 1>her and left. He didn't seem drunk, didn't seem drugged.

1:00:32.640 --> 1:00:36.520
<v Speaker 1>He was emotional, but he wasn't, you know, wet, dirty,

1:00:36.720 --> 1:00:40.280
<v Speaker 1>hadn't been beaten. He said, he just became aware he

1:00:40.360 --> 1:00:42.680
<v Speaker 1>was walking on the street, had no idea where he

1:00:42.800 --> 1:00:45.280
<v Speaker 1>was or how he got there. And the last thing

1:00:45.320 --> 1:00:48.560
<v Speaker 1>he remembered was leaving his work Christmas party and then

1:00:48.640 --> 1:00:52.360
<v Speaker 1>going to an after party with some of his coworkers

1:00:52.840 --> 1:00:55.600
<v Speaker 1>around seven fifteen pm. And the rest of it he

1:00:55.600 --> 1:00:58.160
<v Speaker 1>didn't remember. He was traumatized at want to go to

1:00:58.160 --> 1:01:02.760
<v Speaker 1>the hospital. He just went home. And then the next day,

1:01:03.240 --> 1:01:05.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, I must have just had a crazy hangover,

1:01:06.280 --> 1:01:09.800
<v Speaker 1>living wild and they may have just forgotten it. Just

1:01:09.840 --> 1:01:13.640
<v Speaker 1>one friend helping out another, except that five weeks later

1:01:14.200 --> 1:01:20.240
<v Speaker 1>he vanished after a similar night out with some coworkers

1:01:20.880 --> 1:01:24.200
<v Speaker 1>and his body was found forty days later. Going back

1:01:24.240 --> 1:01:27.200
<v Speaker 1>to your point, so this sounds like someone almost got.

1:01:27.120 --> 1:01:30.080
<v Speaker 3>Him, Yeah, exactly, so he almost he knew this person

1:01:30.160 --> 1:01:32.400
<v Speaker 3>or he encountered this person early on, it feels like.

1:01:32.840 --> 1:01:36.160
<v Speaker 3>But the craziest thing, at least according to Kevin Gannon,

1:01:36.200 --> 1:01:41.680
<v Speaker 3>Anthony Duarte, and Lee Gilbertson, a criminal justice professor, his

1:01:41.760 --> 1:01:46.080
<v Speaker 3>body when it was recovered only showed decomposition for two

1:01:46.160 --> 1:01:49.120
<v Speaker 3>and a half days and he was gone for forty days.

1:01:49.640 --> 1:01:52.240
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so like that's a weird one, but maybe that's

1:01:52.480 --> 1:01:54.919
<v Speaker 2>Why isn't that just an outlier? Maybe sure, maybe that's

1:01:54.960 --> 1:01:55.520
<v Speaker 2>a weird one.

1:01:55.880 --> 1:01:58.919
<v Speaker 3>Okay, that's a weird one. How about Todd geeb Geib

1:01:59.480 --> 1:02:01.920
<v Speaker 3>He was missed for twenty one days and according to

1:02:01.960 --> 1:02:04.520
<v Speaker 3>these three guys, he showed decomposition of two and a

1:02:04.560 --> 1:02:05.040
<v Speaker 3>half days.

1:02:05.080 --> 1:02:08.560
<v Speaker 2>But I still don't see the connection. They're trying to

1:02:08.600 --> 1:02:12.000
<v Speaker 2>hang like hundreds of murders on this theory, and there's

1:02:12.080 --> 1:02:15.920
<v Speaker 2>maybe two or three outliers that like are suspicious, and

1:02:15.960 --> 1:02:19.280
<v Speaker 2>we know that people dispose of bodies and bodies of

1:02:19.320 --> 1:02:21.160
<v Speaker 2>water all the time. I mean, it's the oldest trick

1:02:21.200 --> 1:02:21.640
<v Speaker 2>in the book.

1:02:22.000 --> 1:02:25.200
<v Speaker 1>But they haven't They've said they believe there could be

1:02:25.320 --> 1:02:29.280
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of related murders, but they admit they can't prove

1:02:29.320 --> 1:02:32.520
<v Speaker 1>it eat at least for that. And I see the point, Yeah,

1:02:32.720 --> 1:02:38.400
<v Speaker 1>because for one thing to be for one case to

1:02:38.440 --> 1:02:40.880
<v Speaker 1>be a case of murder, we have to realize one

1:02:40.920 --> 1:02:43.840
<v Speaker 1>case or two cases isolated cases could be cases of

1:02:43.920 --> 1:02:49.919
<v Speaker 1>murder without inherently tying this all in together. For law

1:02:50.000 --> 1:02:55.040
<v Speaker 1>enforcement overall, people are still pretty skeptical about this. You know,

1:02:55.120 --> 1:02:59.280
<v Speaker 1>at this point, honestly, the majority of l eos don't

1:02:59.360 --> 1:03:02.920
<v Speaker 1>think the has a lot of sands the police department

1:03:02.960 --> 1:03:06.680
<v Speaker 1>in Lacrosse, Wisconsin, which is in their theory, it's one

1:03:06.760 --> 1:03:10.959
<v Speaker 1>of the primary sites for this. They were in charge

1:03:10.960 --> 1:03:14.560
<v Speaker 1>of eight of the investigations. They released a statement reiterating

1:03:14.600 --> 1:03:18.560
<v Speaker 1>their initial conclusion that the deaths were accidental or non

1:03:18.600 --> 1:03:23.080
<v Speaker 1>intentional drownings of inebriated young men, and they said that

1:03:23.160 --> 1:03:26.000
<v Speaker 1>they have found no smiley faced symbols in connection with

1:03:26.040 --> 1:03:31.960
<v Speaker 1>their cases. And so we see other agencies saying that

1:03:32.040 --> 1:03:35.000
<v Speaker 1>the FBI released a statement in twenty two thousand and

1:03:35.080 --> 1:03:42.080
<v Speaker 1>eight denying any sort of killer or group of killers.

1:03:43.440 --> 1:03:46.840
<v Speaker 1>That multiple sources who disagree with Gannon and d'arte's theories

1:03:46.880 --> 1:03:51.840
<v Speaker 1>say that we are creating a pattern where none exists,

1:03:51.920 --> 1:04:00.760
<v Speaker 1>perhaps as an emotional reaction to the indescribable pain expectedly

1:04:00.840 --> 1:04:05.640
<v Speaker 1>losing a loved one. At this point, Gannon and Darte

1:04:05.920 --> 1:04:09.360
<v Speaker 1>still stand by their findings and their research. They insist

1:04:09.440 --> 1:04:12.000
<v Speaker 1>the case or linked. They think the smiley faced killer

1:04:12.160 --> 1:04:15.480
<v Speaker 1>or killers is or are still at large.

1:04:16.120 --> 1:04:17.880
<v Speaker 2>And I'm with you, guys.

1:04:17.880 --> 1:04:23.320
<v Speaker 1>There are specific cases where the official explanation leaves something

1:04:23.360 --> 1:04:24.160
<v Speaker 1>to be desired.

1:04:25.080 --> 1:04:27.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you know, we didn't even get into things that

1:04:27.840 --> 1:04:34.640
<v Speaker 3>Gainan believes about the lividity lividity of some of these victims,

1:04:34.720 --> 1:04:38.040
<v Speaker 3>and that's a term that's describing the pooling of blood

1:04:38.080 --> 1:04:42.000
<v Speaker 3>in a dead body, like after death has occurred within

1:04:42.040 --> 1:04:45.360
<v Speaker 3>a body. And you know, I mean, I get this

1:04:45.600 --> 1:04:49.840
<v Speaker 3>exactly right. But around sixty hours after death, lividity occurs

1:04:49.880 --> 1:04:53.160
<v Speaker 3>where blood pools, it just goes toward it uses gravity

1:04:53.200 --> 1:04:56.400
<v Speaker 3>and heads towards the ground, right, and then there's discoloration

1:04:56.520 --> 1:05:00.200
<v Speaker 3>on the body where the blood has pooled. And he

1:05:00.680 --> 1:05:03.680
<v Speaker 3>at least you know this team Gannon and then the rest.

1:05:03.920 --> 1:05:08.280
<v Speaker 3>They're saying that the lividity within these dead bodies is

1:05:08.320 --> 1:05:10.400
<v Speaker 3>not matching up, and it appears that they were killed

1:05:10.440 --> 1:05:12.840
<v Speaker 3>on land and then dumped in the water. So and

1:05:13.200 --> 1:05:16.240
<v Speaker 3>here's here's the deal for me. Even if these cases

1:05:16.240 --> 1:05:18.160
<v Speaker 3>aren't linked and it's not a single killer or a

1:05:18.160 --> 1:05:20.960
<v Speaker 3>single group or something killing these people, there are individual

1:05:21.000 --> 1:05:25.880
<v Speaker 3>cases out there that appear to have enough questionable things

1:05:25.920 --> 1:05:30.160
<v Speaker 3>about them that Gannon and those guys have identified that

1:05:30.280 --> 1:05:34.240
<v Speaker 3>some of these cases maybe should be expanded upon or

1:05:34.320 --> 1:05:39.360
<v Speaker 3>could be expanded upon. That's where I'm sitting with it currently.

1:05:40.200 --> 1:05:44.360
<v Speaker 1>I see what you're saying, absolutely, and we have an

1:05:44.400 --> 1:05:46.120
<v Speaker 1>abundance of.

1:05:47.760 --> 1:05:48.880
<v Speaker 2>Other theories.

1:05:49.240 --> 1:05:52.600
<v Speaker 1>This is pretty much an intro episode to the concepts,

1:05:52.720 --> 1:05:56.840
<v Speaker 1>right sure, because we can deep dive into other theories,

1:05:57.560 --> 1:06:00.680
<v Speaker 1>such as the once popular belief that the killer or

1:06:00.800 --> 1:06:07.880
<v Speaker 1>killers was traveling via their their work right, and they

1:06:07.880 --> 1:06:10.160
<v Speaker 1>were able to use that as a cover because, of course,

1:06:10.640 --> 1:06:15.720
<v Speaker 1>as we all know, if you want to successfully get

1:06:15.760 --> 1:06:20.480
<v Speaker 1>away with committing crimes against strangers, or if you want

1:06:20.520 --> 1:06:23.840
<v Speaker 1>to if you want to murder someone and be a

1:06:23.880 --> 1:06:29.560
<v Speaker 1>ghost and never be connected to it, one very efficient

1:06:29.600 --> 1:06:32.040
<v Speaker 1>way to cover your tracks is to already have been

1:06:32.080 --> 1:06:39.360
<v Speaker 1>traveling for work. And that's our classic episode for this evening.

1:06:39.440 --> 1:06:40.680
<v Speaker 1>We can't wait to hear your thoughts.

1:06:40.760 --> 1:06:42.080
<v Speaker 2>That's right, let us know what you think. You can

1:06:42.120 --> 1:06:44.520
<v Speaker 2>reach you to the Hamil Conspiracy Stuff where we exist

1:06:44.560 --> 1:06:48.560
<v Speaker 2>on Facebook x and YouTube on Instagram and TikTok or

1:06:48.600 --> 1:06:49.640
<v Speaker 2>Conspiracy Stuff Show.

1:06:49.680 --> 1:06:51.920
<v Speaker 3>If you want to call us dial one eight three

1:06:52.040 --> 1:06:57.160
<v Speaker 3>three std WYTK that's our voicemail system. You've got three minutes,

1:06:57.240 --> 1:06:59.440
<v Speaker 3>give yourself a cool nickname and let us know if

1:06:59.440 --> 1:07:01.520
<v Speaker 3>we can use your name and message on the air.

1:07:01.840 --> 1:07:03.400
<v Speaker 3>If you got more to say then can fit in

1:07:03.440 --> 1:07:06.240
<v Speaker 3>that voicemail. Why not instead send us a good old

1:07:06.280 --> 1:07:07.040
<v Speaker 3>fashioned email.

1:07:07.280 --> 1:07:10.200
<v Speaker 6>We are the entities that read every single piece of

1:07:10.200 --> 1:07:14.640
<v Speaker 6>correspondence we receive, be aware, yet not afraid. Sometimes the

1:07:14.720 --> 1:07:37.720
<v Speaker 6>void writes back conspiracy at iHeartRadio dot com.

1:07:37.920 --> 1:07:39.960
<v Speaker 3>Stuff they don't want you to know is a production

1:07:40.080 --> 1:07:44.600
<v Speaker 3>of iHeartRadio. For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app,

1:07:44.680 --> 1:07:47.880
<v Speaker 3>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.