WEBVTT -  Warner Bros. Sales Fall on Loss of NBA, Weak Film Slate 

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:10.559
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. You're listening to the

0:00:10.600 --> 0:00:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at ten am

0:00:14.600 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on Apple, Cocklay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg

0:00:17.920 --> 0:00:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Business App. Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts,

0:00:21.360 --> 0:00:23.560
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:24.239 --> 0:00:26.920
<v Speaker 2>We are an earning season, and right now the big

0:00:26.960 --> 0:00:30.560
<v Speaker 2>media companies are taking their turn publishing their latest results.

0:00:30.600 --> 0:00:33.760
<v Speaker 2>Warner Brothers coming out with numbers. The sales declined after

0:00:33.800 --> 0:00:36.199
<v Speaker 2>it lost the NBA rights, but I don't know that

0:00:36.280 --> 0:00:38.280
<v Speaker 2>it matters that much given that this is a company

0:00:38.800 --> 0:00:43.559
<v Speaker 2>being absorbed by Paramount eventually potentially, Yes, right now that's

0:00:43.600 --> 0:00:45.600
<v Speaker 2>kind of on hold, but the thinking is that it

0:00:45.680 --> 0:00:48.360
<v Speaker 2>will be. Fox also came out with the results. The

0:00:48.360 --> 0:00:49.000
<v Speaker 2>World Cup was.

0:00:48.960 --> 0:00:51.440
<v Speaker 3>Certainly a good thing for that company. Let's begin.

0:00:51.560 --> 0:00:54.720
<v Speaker 2>Getha rang and Athen she is our analyst on US Media,

0:00:54.800 --> 0:00:58.000
<v Speaker 2>joining us from Princeton, KEITHA. Of the results that came out,

0:00:58.040 --> 0:00:59.000
<v Speaker 2>what gets your attention?

0:01:00.520 --> 0:01:03.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean you pointed out Warner Brothers Discovery. Yes,

0:01:04.080 --> 0:01:07.160
<v Speaker 4>you know, the earnings, as you said, Scarlett, and rightly

0:01:07.240 --> 0:01:10.199
<v Speaker 4>so is definitely the sides the side show for the moment.

0:01:10.720 --> 0:01:12.720
<v Speaker 4>But I think you know things could change very quickly,

0:01:12.720 --> 0:01:15.399
<v Speaker 4>and you know, it could be the main piece here

0:01:15.440 --> 0:01:17.880
<v Speaker 4>because we're really looking at a company, and I think

0:01:17.920 --> 0:01:20.240
<v Speaker 4>everybody now is kind of thinking of what happens if

0:01:20.520 --> 0:01:24.760
<v Speaker 4>the Paramount sky Dance deal falls through. And you know,

0:01:24.880 --> 0:01:27.880
<v Speaker 4>we know that the merger agreement terminates on June fourth

0:01:27.920 --> 0:01:30.640
<v Speaker 4>of twenty twenty seven, and if Paramount sky Dance can't

0:01:30.640 --> 0:01:33.240
<v Speaker 4>get its act together and can't like settle out of court,

0:01:33.560 --> 0:01:36.680
<v Speaker 4>there's a very high probability that they actually lose this

0:01:36.920 --> 0:01:39.720
<v Speaker 4>trial and then they are in really bad shape. But

0:01:39.760 --> 0:01:42.240
<v Speaker 4>Warner Brothers Discovery actually is doing a lot to improve

0:01:42.280 --> 0:01:45.280
<v Speaker 4>its fundamentals. We saw some pretty decent results at least

0:01:45.280 --> 0:01:48.000
<v Speaker 4>on the streaming side of the business as well as

0:01:48.520 --> 0:01:50.840
<v Speaker 4>you know, on the TV network side. Yes, the loss

0:01:50.840 --> 0:01:53.520
<v Speaker 4>of the NBA definitely hurt them, but it also helped

0:01:53.560 --> 0:01:56.200
<v Speaker 4>them on the expense side, because you know, the EBITDA

0:01:56.320 --> 0:01:59.160
<v Speaker 4>declines that we saw, we were seeing something like, you know,

0:01:59.240 --> 0:02:02.960
<v Speaker 4>twenty five thirty percent ebidetic clients last year. Those really

0:02:03.000 --> 0:02:05.960
<v Speaker 4>moderated now to around four to five percent. So there

0:02:06.040 --> 0:02:08.400
<v Speaker 4>was some good news there as well. And then as

0:02:08.400 --> 0:02:10.680
<v Speaker 4>you pointed out, for Fox, of course, huge quarter there

0:02:11.800 --> 0:02:14.519
<v Speaker 4>with advertising. But again, the bigger story for Fox is

0:02:14.560 --> 0:02:16.880
<v Speaker 4>also it's pending deal for Roku, so a lot of

0:02:17.520 --> 0:02:20.280
<v Speaker 4>MNA stuff kind of overshadowing the fundamentals here.

0:02:20.800 --> 0:02:23.320
<v Speaker 5>And I saw that Fox so they're not going to

0:02:23.320 --> 0:02:25.880
<v Speaker 5>reopen the NFL negotiations until, you know, towards the end

0:02:25.919 --> 0:02:28.359
<v Speaker 5>of the twenty twenty nine season. And I know there

0:02:28.400 --> 0:02:30.919
<v Speaker 5>was some pressure maybe to do something sooner because the

0:02:31.000 --> 0:02:33.120
<v Speaker 5>NFL knows that they can get a big increase in rights.

0:02:33.160 --> 0:02:34.280
<v Speaker 5>What's what's the status there?

0:02:35.400 --> 0:02:38.359
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, So you know, this was always a huge, huge

0:02:38.480 --> 0:02:42.000
<v Speaker 4>downside risk for Fox. Pauls. I think, you know, just

0:02:42.240 --> 0:02:45.079
<v Speaker 4>by them kind of you know, kicking the can down

0:02:45.080 --> 0:02:47.359
<v Speaker 4>the road. This it's a huge sigh of relief, I

0:02:47.360 --> 0:02:50.480
<v Speaker 4>think for investors because Fox was very, very heavily exposed

0:02:50.480 --> 0:02:52.960
<v Speaker 4>to the NFL. You know, we ran some numbers and

0:02:53.000 --> 0:02:56.600
<v Speaker 4>we thought that if the NFL actually did manage to

0:02:56.600 --> 0:02:59.800
<v Speaker 4>secure a big rights increase, that would pressure Fox ebit

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:04.160
<v Speaker 4>about thirty to forty percent almost just because of the exposure.

0:03:04.680 --> 0:03:06.520
<v Speaker 3>So this definitely, yeah, really.

0:03:06.320 --> 0:03:08.560
<v Speaker 4>Helps kind of the investment case and gives them a

0:03:08.600 --> 0:03:11.520
<v Speaker 4>lot of breathing time, if you will, to figure out

0:03:11.520 --> 0:03:12.400
<v Speaker 4>everything with Roku.

0:03:13.480 --> 0:03:15.440
<v Speaker 2>You know, we talk a lot with Randall Williams, he's

0:03:15.440 --> 0:03:18.520
<v Speaker 2>our Business of Sports reporter, about the possibility of a

0:03:18.800 --> 0:03:22.920
<v Speaker 2>strike for the MLB season at some point because of

0:03:22.960 --> 0:03:27.280
<v Speaker 2>the discussion on some kind of salary cap if that happens, Gita,

0:03:27.320 --> 0:03:29.960
<v Speaker 2>who's most exposed, Who among the big media companies will

0:03:30.000 --> 0:03:31.880
<v Speaker 2>be most exposed? And is it as bad as we

0:03:31.919 --> 0:03:33.720
<v Speaker 2>think it is, because, I mean, the MLB is not

0:03:33.840 --> 0:03:36.600
<v Speaker 2>the NFL. There are so many games that the MLB

0:03:36.680 --> 0:03:39.680
<v Speaker 2>plays as opposed to you know, trust the limited number

0:03:39.680 --> 0:03:40.600
<v Speaker 2>of games for the NFL.

0:03:41.760 --> 0:03:45.320
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, there's definitely you know, some overhang, Scarlett, but as

0:03:45.360 --> 0:03:48.240
<v Speaker 4>you pointed out, not a whole lot of exposure from

0:03:48.240 --> 0:03:51.160
<v Speaker 4>the national side, on the national TV right side. Remember,

0:03:51.200 --> 0:03:54.800
<v Speaker 4>the MLB has a lot more local TV rights exposure.

0:03:55.760 --> 0:03:58.280
<v Speaker 4>You know, it used to be the case with the

0:03:58.400 --> 0:04:01.160
<v Speaker 4>r A sense of course that that business has been

0:04:01.240 --> 0:04:05.200
<v Speaker 4>in secular decline. But yeah, some exposure definitely for for

0:04:05.320 --> 0:04:08.640
<v Speaker 4>Warner Brothers, Discovery, with the Turner Networks, for Fox. But

0:04:08.720 --> 0:04:11.000
<v Speaker 4>I think all of it can be mitigated with you know,

0:04:11.280 --> 0:04:13.040
<v Speaker 4>the presence of other sports programming.

0:04:13.600 --> 0:04:15.560
<v Speaker 5>Did Warner Brothers with this earnings at least did they

0:04:15.600 --> 0:04:18.000
<v Speaker 5>comment on the pending deal with Paramount. Did they give

0:04:18.000 --> 0:04:20.000
<v Speaker 5>you any color as to how this might play out.

0:04:21.040 --> 0:04:24.600
<v Speaker 4>I mean, it was all just really boilerplate commentary. They said,

0:04:24.640 --> 0:04:27.880
<v Speaker 4>you know that they are hopeful that the deal closes,

0:04:27.920 --> 0:04:30.680
<v Speaker 4>but you know, I think at the same time, they

0:04:30.720 --> 0:04:34.320
<v Speaker 4>do very much realize that, you know, things could go south,

0:04:34.400 --> 0:04:37.880
<v Speaker 4>and I think David Zaslav is definitely prepared for that contingency. Remember, Paul,

0:04:38.000 --> 0:04:42.240
<v Speaker 4>if if the deal doesn't go through next June, they

0:04:42.240 --> 0:04:45.320
<v Speaker 4>do collect a nice, big fat check for seven billion

0:04:45.360 --> 0:04:47.640
<v Speaker 4>dollars apart from, of course, the six hundred and fifty

0:04:47.680 --> 0:04:50.839
<v Speaker 4>million dollar ticking fee that goes into effect on October first.

0:04:50.720 --> 0:04:53.200
<v Speaker 2>Right, and that would be Paramount guidance paying for it

0:04:53.240 --> 0:04:56.120
<v Speaker 2>in you know, a lot of that backed by Larry Ellison.

0:04:56.160 --> 0:04:57.240
<v Speaker 3>When it comes down to it.

0:04:58.279 --> 0:05:01.680
<v Speaker 2>We did hear though, that the you K regulators have

0:05:01.800 --> 0:05:05.080
<v Speaker 2>approved the Paramount Warner Brothers deal. Does that move the

0:05:05.080 --> 0:05:06.760
<v Speaker 2>needle at all, Gita or is it just.

0:05:06.839 --> 0:05:07.599
<v Speaker 3>A duck in a box?

0:05:08.640 --> 0:05:11.599
<v Speaker 4>Not at all, Scarlett. Really, the biggest thing right now

0:05:11.640 --> 0:05:14.000
<v Speaker 4>for the Warner Brothers and the Paramount deal are the

0:05:14.160 --> 0:05:18.000
<v Speaker 4>you know, the the twelve state ages who have filed

0:05:18.440 --> 0:05:21.400
<v Speaker 4>a motion to basically block this merger, and it looks

0:05:21.440 --> 0:05:24.440
<v Speaker 4>like the judge everything seems to be kind of favoring

0:05:24.839 --> 0:05:27.200
<v Speaker 4>the courts right now. So so Paramount, is it really

0:05:27.240 --> 0:05:30.760
<v Speaker 4>in a difficult situation at this point, Ken the I've been.

0:05:30.680 --> 0:05:32.760
<v Speaker 5>Trying to read up on this, But is there any

0:05:32.760 --> 0:05:36.160
<v Speaker 5>type of out of court settlement that Paramount could get

0:05:36.240 --> 0:05:38.880
<v Speaker 5>that would be still preserve the merits of the deal

0:05:39.600 --> 0:05:42.000
<v Speaker 5>while you know, satisfying these states.

0:05:42.520 --> 0:05:44.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's it's really a double ed sword.

0:05:44.520 --> 0:05:48.039
<v Speaker 4>So you know, if we listen to Rob Bonta, who is,

0:05:48.279 --> 0:05:52.000
<v Speaker 4>you know, the age in California, he really seems to

0:05:52.160 --> 0:05:56.400
<v Speaker 4>not be favoring a settlement. Structural remedies are always possible, Paul,

0:05:56.400 --> 0:05:58.960
<v Speaker 4>But then, as you pointed out, does that then get

0:05:59.120 --> 0:06:02.120
<v Speaker 4>Paramount the six billion dollars in synergies that they've promised.

0:06:03.400 --> 0:06:07.080
<v Speaker 4>It's really going to be a very very tough road.

0:06:06.760 --> 0:06:09.320
<v Speaker 4>The obviously, Paramount doesn't want to give up any of

0:06:09.360 --> 0:06:12.000
<v Speaker 4>its assets. They want to get away with as few

0:06:12.000 --> 0:06:15.080
<v Speaker 4>structural remedies as possible, but they might have to, you know,

0:06:15.160 --> 0:06:17.960
<v Speaker 4>actually end up selling a big portion of the TV

0:06:18.040 --> 0:06:22.280
<v Speaker 4>network's business or maybe even some of the studio assets.

0:06:22.880 --> 0:06:27.120
<v Speaker 2>So GITA operationally, then Warner Brothers Discovery, paramount S Guidance

0:06:27.200 --> 0:06:30.320
<v Speaker 2>have to continue to move forward as independent companies, right,

0:06:30.360 --> 0:06:32.719
<v Speaker 2>Like they can't really can they do a lot in

0:06:32.800 --> 0:06:35.880
<v Speaker 2>terms of you know, looking at operations and seeing where

0:06:35.920 --> 0:06:38.680
<v Speaker 2>their synergies or they just have to continue as is.

0:06:39.720 --> 0:06:42.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so they are continuing as is, and actually ironically

0:06:42.960 --> 0:06:44.960
<v Speaker 4>they both are doing kind of okay, just kind of

0:06:44.960 --> 0:06:48.039
<v Speaker 4>given the situation. So Paramount, what we saw in their

0:06:48.080 --> 0:06:51.159
<v Speaker 4>results was they actually posted pretty strong profits and a

0:06:51.160 --> 0:06:54.320
<v Speaker 4>lot of that was driven by the synergies with the

0:06:54.360 --> 0:06:56.839
<v Speaker 4>sky Dance transactions. So what we saw and what really

0:06:56.839 --> 0:06:58.560
<v Speaker 4>I think surprised even the street, was that if you

0:06:58.600 --> 0:07:01.320
<v Speaker 4>looked at the TV network business, we've seen margins of

0:07:01.320 --> 0:07:04.080
<v Speaker 4>about twenty five percent just with all of those synergies

0:07:04.080 --> 0:07:06.279
<v Speaker 4>in the business, you know, they kind of took that

0:07:06.440 --> 0:07:09.120
<v Speaker 4>up to almost thirty five percent. So there's obviously a

0:07:09.160 --> 0:07:11.360
<v Speaker 4>lot of cost savings to be extracted, which is really

0:07:11.400 --> 0:07:13.440
<v Speaker 4>what the street is banking on with the whole Warner

0:07:13.440 --> 0:07:17.239
<v Speaker 4>Brothers Discovery transactions, since they've outlined about six billion dollars

0:07:17.280 --> 0:07:19.880
<v Speaker 4>in cost savings on the Warner Brothers side as well.

0:07:19.880 --> 0:07:22.160
<v Speaker 4>We saw again, you know, they're managing their decline in

0:07:22.200 --> 0:07:25.040
<v Speaker 4>the TV networks business pretty well. Streaming has been an

0:07:25.080 --> 0:07:29.600
<v Speaker 4>absolute standout scarlet. They've really really made fantastic progress when

0:07:29.640 --> 0:07:32.600
<v Speaker 4>it comes to profitability. You know, they posted margins of

0:07:32.600 --> 0:07:35.040
<v Speaker 4>about seventeen percent, and remember their long term target is

0:07:35.080 --> 0:07:37.360
<v Speaker 4>twenty percent, so they're really in pretty good shape. The

0:07:37.400 --> 0:07:39.200
<v Speaker 4>studio is a little bit of an up and down,

0:07:39.640 --> 0:07:41.440
<v Speaker 4>but we do have a pretty exciting line up. I mean,

0:07:41.480 --> 0:07:43.200
<v Speaker 4>we have Done coming a little bit later this year,

0:07:43.200 --> 0:07:45.680
<v Speaker 4>and then of course the Digger with Tom Cruise, which

0:07:45.720 --> 0:07:48.160
<v Speaker 4>is you know, expected to do really well, so that'd

0:07:48.200 --> 0:07:48.679
<v Speaker 4>be interesting.

0:07:49.200 --> 0:07:52.120
<v Speaker 3>Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Intelligence coming up after this.

0:07:56.280 --> 0:07:59.920
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:03.160
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple, Cocklay and Android

0:08:03.160 --> 0:08:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Blueberg Business app. Listen on demand wherever

0:08:06.520 --> 0:08:09.840
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:08:10.560 --> 0:08:12.440
<v Speaker 5>Let's get back to the tech space, because why not.

0:08:12.480 --> 0:08:15.120
<v Speaker 5>You can't stay away from tech very long because that's

0:08:15.120 --> 0:08:19.520
<v Speaker 5>what's driving the bus here. I noticed at Google, which

0:08:19.560 --> 0:08:22.920
<v Speaker 5>some people call Alphabet, they've had some changes in some

0:08:22.960 --> 0:08:27.320
<v Speaker 5>of their AI management ranks. I was told by a

0:08:27.400 --> 0:08:29.440
<v Speaker 5>guest from Franklin Templeton, who does a lot of this

0:08:29.520 --> 0:08:32.400
<v Speaker 5>tech investing. Don't worry. It's okay. He's not going to

0:08:32.400 --> 0:08:34.280
<v Speaker 5>be wandering far. But I want to talk to man

0:08:34.280 --> 0:08:36.160
<v Speaker 5>Deep Sing because he knows all the tech stuff. Yes,

0:08:36.160 --> 0:08:39.439
<v Speaker 5>he does work intelligence. Man Deep, we had some looks

0:08:39.440 --> 0:08:43.960
<v Speaker 5>like some management changes at the all important AI business

0:08:44.080 --> 0:08:47.160
<v Speaker 5>within Alphabet. Tell us what's going on there and whether

0:08:47.720 --> 0:08:48.840
<v Speaker 5>investors should be concerned.

0:08:49.360 --> 0:08:53.760
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, these are a couple of high profile departures after

0:08:54.600 --> 0:08:59.280
<v Speaker 6>you know, recently, I believe four weeks back, there were

0:09:00.440 --> 0:09:03.280
<v Speaker 6>a couple of other names that had departed. One went

0:09:03.360 --> 0:09:07.439
<v Speaker 6>to open Ai. So the fact that Google is losing talent,

0:09:07.600 --> 0:09:09.600
<v Speaker 6>I mean, these are people who have been there for

0:09:09.760 --> 0:09:12.960
<v Speaker 6>very long. It's definitely not a good sign if you

0:09:13.000 --> 0:09:17.360
<v Speaker 6>ask me. And plus their model release has been delayed.

0:09:17.520 --> 0:09:20.840
<v Speaker 6>So the Gemini three point five version model pro one

0:09:21.440 --> 0:09:25.600
<v Speaker 6>has been delayed, and from what we have gathered, the

0:09:25.679 --> 0:09:28.880
<v Speaker 6>Gemini four is most likely going to get delayed. So

0:09:29.600 --> 0:09:32.240
<v Speaker 6>this is a race about the models. And if you're

0:09:32.320 --> 0:09:36.920
<v Speaker 6>not releasing a frontier model, and Anthropic and open Ai

0:09:37.320 --> 0:09:40.520
<v Speaker 6>keep creating all the news about how their models can

0:09:40.800 --> 0:09:46.840
<v Speaker 6>have you know, any system out there that's definitely feels like,

0:09:47.320 --> 0:09:50.000
<v Speaker 6>you know, Google is missing at least the model lead

0:09:50.200 --> 0:09:54.240
<v Speaker 6>right now, and it could change, but to my mind,

0:09:54.760 --> 0:09:58.280
<v Speaker 6>this is not a positive and I think the stock

0:09:58.600 --> 0:09:59.800
<v Speaker 6>reflected that sentiment.

0:10:00.559 --> 0:10:05.120
<v Speaker 2>So we hear that they're going to really centralize their

0:10:05.200 --> 0:10:07.880
<v Speaker 2>leadership to California that kind.

0:10:07.679 --> 0:10:09.920
<v Speaker 3>Of is the seat of everything, even though we know that,

0:10:10.960 --> 0:10:11.080
<v Speaker 3>is it?

0:10:11.160 --> 0:10:15.280
<v Speaker 2>Larry Pager Surrey Brinn, who's been moving to outside of California.

0:10:14.800 --> 0:10:19.679
<v Speaker 3>Florida, I don't know, Nevada, Nevada. Yeah, he went to village. Yeah, yeah,

0:10:19.720 --> 0:10:20.840
<v Speaker 3>exactly Incline.

0:10:20.520 --> 0:10:23.200
<v Speaker 2>Village, which is basically California, but just across the border.

0:10:23.720 --> 0:10:28.160
<v Speaker 2>What does that say about California as the center of

0:10:28.280 --> 0:10:32.040
<v Speaker 2>tech talent and how whatever efforts you want to make

0:10:32.080 --> 0:10:34.760
<v Speaker 2>to try to decentralize that to spread it out to

0:10:34.800 --> 0:10:36.640
<v Speaker 2>other places, maybe lower cost places.

0:10:36.720 --> 0:10:38.240
<v Speaker 3>It's it's kind of a fool's errant, isn't it.

0:10:38.720 --> 0:10:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:10:39.080 --> 0:10:43.679
<v Speaker 6>And look right now, it feels like anthropic and open

0:10:43.720 --> 0:10:47.560
<v Speaker 6>AI are getting the big names when it comes to

0:10:47.840 --> 0:10:51.240
<v Speaker 6>you know, the folks who are actually training these models,

0:10:51.280 --> 0:10:55.040
<v Speaker 6>and you know the scaling laws that are driving all

0:10:55.120 --> 0:10:58.560
<v Speaker 6>the development. So from that perspective, I mean, Google is

0:10:58.640 --> 0:11:01.960
<v Speaker 6>still pretty large firm and they've got you know, folks

0:11:02.000 --> 0:11:04.600
<v Speaker 6>all over but there was a time when Google and

0:11:04.679 --> 0:11:08.240
<v Speaker 6>Meta used to be the magnet for the top talent.

0:11:08.800 --> 0:11:13.840
<v Speaker 6>It feels like right now it's Anthropic and open Ai,

0:11:14.080 --> 0:11:18.079
<v Speaker 6>and the departures kind of suggest that. I mean, even

0:11:18.120 --> 0:11:20.720
<v Speaker 6>though Google has a lot going for them in terms

0:11:20.760 --> 0:11:25.240
<v Speaker 6>of infrastructure, the TPUs and all those are positives, but

0:11:25.280 --> 0:11:27.840
<v Speaker 6>when it comes to the model race, I mean, that's

0:11:27.840 --> 0:11:33.560
<v Speaker 6>why Mark Zuckerberg spent millions to form that superintelligence unit

0:11:33.679 --> 0:11:36.719
<v Speaker 6>with fifty people, but fifty of the smartest people and

0:11:36.840 --> 0:11:40.320
<v Speaker 6>still Meta doesn't have a model that is comparable to

0:11:40.360 --> 0:11:43.800
<v Speaker 6>the Frontier lab. So it is a very hard problem

0:11:43.840 --> 0:11:46.120
<v Speaker 6>to solve in terms of catching up to the frontier

0:11:46.480 --> 0:11:50.000
<v Speaker 6>and I feel once you slip, it will get hard.

0:11:50.400 --> 0:11:52.719
<v Speaker 2>So just to follow upon that, if you don't come

0:11:52.720 --> 0:11:54.640
<v Speaker 2>out with the frontier model and you have this talent,

0:11:54.760 --> 0:11:56.360
<v Speaker 2>is it just a matter of time before that talent

0:11:56.400 --> 0:11:59.560
<v Speaker 2>then goes to open Ai Nthropic out of frustration that

0:11:59.559 --> 0:12:01.480
<v Speaker 2>they're not making more concrete progress.

0:12:01.600 --> 0:12:04.520
<v Speaker 6>I mean, it sounds like, especially with Jeff Dean and

0:12:04.679 --> 0:12:07.959
<v Speaker 6>a couple of guys that left, you know this week,

0:12:09.200 --> 0:12:12.280
<v Speaker 6>there was an element of frustration, and that's been the

0:12:12.320 --> 0:12:16.559
<v Speaker 6>case with Google since the chatchipt days they invented the transformer,

0:12:16.640 --> 0:12:19.720
<v Speaker 6>Why weren't they the first ones to release a product?

0:12:19.760 --> 0:12:23.760
<v Speaker 6>So it keeps coming back with this management team. It's like,

0:12:23.880 --> 0:12:28.240
<v Speaker 6>you're not releasing new products fast enough. And yes, they

0:12:28.280 --> 0:12:31.200
<v Speaker 6>have to defend that search business, which is the cash cow,

0:12:31.320 --> 0:12:35.400
<v Speaker 6>which is what feeds everything. So I can see both sides,

0:12:35.480 --> 0:12:38.240
<v Speaker 6>but when it comes to talent, they'll go to the

0:12:38.280 --> 0:12:40.640
<v Speaker 6>place where they see, you know, a lot happening in

0:12:40.720 --> 0:12:44.640
<v Speaker 6>terms of new products, model development, and so maybe Google

0:12:44.720 --> 0:12:48.160
<v Speaker 6>is being conservative on the model side for a good reason.

0:12:48.360 --> 0:12:49.480
<v Speaker 6>They have to defend search.

0:12:49.600 --> 0:12:51.640
<v Speaker 5>I think what we're all coming to appreciate more is

0:12:51.880 --> 0:12:55.400
<v Speaker 5>this stuff's expensive to do this stuff now and Google's

0:12:55.400 --> 0:12:57.600
<v Speaker 5>out today with a twenty five billion dollar bond off.

0:12:57.760 --> 0:12:59.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, they can reach capital.

0:12:59.679 --> 0:13:00.640
<v Speaker 2>Snap the fingers.

0:13:00.760 --> 0:13:03.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Heaven like the Anthropics.

0:13:02.640 --> 0:13:04.600
<v Speaker 5>And the opening as so the world. I mean, at

0:13:04.640 --> 0:13:07.360
<v Speaker 5>some point they got to start hitting the capital markets,

0:13:07.400 --> 0:13:07.920
<v Speaker 5>I would think.

0:13:08.559 --> 0:13:12.080
<v Speaker 6>I mean, the interesting anecdote here is a lot of

0:13:12.360 --> 0:13:18.160
<v Speaker 6>Google's cloud revenue comes from Anthropic running their workloads on Google.

0:13:18.440 --> 0:13:22.800
<v Speaker 6>In fact, Entropics models are even trained on Google TPUs,

0:13:22.840 --> 0:13:26.400
<v Speaker 6>so Google is the infrastructure provider for Entropic. But at

0:13:26.400 --> 0:13:29.600
<v Speaker 6>the same time, they are competing at the model there.

0:13:29.640 --> 0:13:33.040
<v Speaker 6>So it is kind of quite intertwined when you think

0:13:33.080 --> 0:13:37.200
<v Speaker 6>about this race, and it's very concentrated. But I don't

0:13:37.200 --> 0:13:39.360
<v Speaker 6>think Google cares about it being expensive.

0:13:39.440 --> 0:13:42.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, before we let you go, there is a viewer

0:13:42.440 --> 0:13:45.719
<v Speaker 2>I should say, a listener question for you today. It

0:13:45.840 --> 0:13:47.920
<v Speaker 2>has to do with Advanced micro Devices, which is hired

0:13:47.960 --> 0:13:49.760
<v Speaker 2>today by about one point eight percent, but it did

0:13:49.800 --> 0:13:52.880
<v Speaker 2>plunge about seven percent after its latest set of results.

0:13:52.960 --> 0:13:55.040
<v Speaker 3>How come AMD stock fell flat.

0:13:54.800 --> 0:13:57.960
<v Speaker 2>When it reported earnings after the market clothes on Tuesday.

0:13:58.000 --> 0:14:01.680
<v Speaker 2>What's your read on those results? I investors reacted negatively.

0:14:03.000 --> 0:14:07.040
<v Speaker 6>I mean right now when we hear about how supply

0:14:07.200 --> 0:14:10.640
<v Speaker 6>constrained the market is. And you know, we keep seeing

0:14:10.679 --> 0:14:14.320
<v Speaker 6>with Nvidio's numbers every time they report, they just beat

0:14:14.360 --> 0:14:17.360
<v Speaker 6>and raise in a big way. With AMD, we didn't

0:14:17.440 --> 0:14:20.680
<v Speaker 6>see that big beat and rais and that's how the

0:14:20.720 --> 0:14:24.480
<v Speaker 6>whisper numbers are always higher. You see the reaction with

0:14:24.560 --> 0:14:28.560
<v Speaker 6>Sands today, Sock is down. They had phenomenal growth quarters.

0:14:28.600 --> 0:14:32.320
<v Speaker 6>So that's where you know, expectations and even the consensus

0:14:32.400 --> 0:14:36.040
<v Speaker 6>numbers are much lower when you compare to what the

0:14:36.080 --> 0:14:39.320
<v Speaker 6>companies are measured against and Indy had a good quarter,

0:14:39.640 --> 0:14:42.560
<v Speaker 6>but then it wasn't something to wow, you know, and

0:14:42.920 --> 0:14:44.400
<v Speaker 6>have that snap positive reaction.

0:14:45.040 --> 0:14:47.960
<v Speaker 3>Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Intelligence coming up after this.

0:14:52.280 --> 0:14:55.960
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:14:56.080 --> 0:14:59.160
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple, Cocklay and Android

0:14:59.160 --> 0:15:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Work Business Up. Listen on demand wherever

0:15:02.520 --> 0:15:05.840
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:15:06.760 --> 0:15:09.480
<v Speaker 5>Hurts Global they put out some numbers that beat Wall

0:15:09.480 --> 0:15:12.640
<v Speaker 5>Streets estimates six flags. Their shares are down as a

0:15:12.800 --> 0:15:16.680
<v Speaker 5>water park operator reported revenue for the quarter that missed estimates.

0:15:16.760 --> 0:15:19.280
<v Speaker 5>Let's break it down with Jody Louri. She's a senior

0:15:19.280 --> 0:15:22.360
<v Speaker 5>credit analyst of Bloomberg Intelligence. She follows all these leisure companies.

0:15:23.720 --> 0:15:26.640
<v Speaker 5>Let's first start with Hurts because I am a gold

0:15:26.760 --> 0:15:28.480
<v Speaker 5>member at Hurts Global.

0:15:28.560 --> 0:15:29.240
<v Speaker 3>I'm proud of it.

0:15:29.320 --> 0:15:32.280
<v Speaker 5>I'm proud of it. Yes, what's going on? It hurts Jody.

0:15:33.640 --> 0:15:38.560
<v Speaker 7>I mean, those are the priorities ball so's the thing

0:15:38.600 --> 0:15:41.200
<v Speaker 7>that's interesting about Hurts is that they were very optimistic

0:15:41.440 --> 0:15:45.240
<v Speaker 7>on their call. They talked about franchising as the next

0:15:45.280 --> 0:15:48.240
<v Speaker 7>new endeavor, next big thing, how it was going to

0:15:48.320 --> 0:15:52.600
<v Speaker 7>really help the company sort of get better margins and

0:15:52.640 --> 0:15:55.840
<v Speaker 7>be similar to how the hotels do franchising or asset

0:15:55.920 --> 0:15:59.360
<v Speaker 7>late models. But what's so interesting about it is when

0:15:59.400 --> 0:16:01.880
<v Speaker 7>you set the bar so low on a company, it's

0:16:02.040 --> 0:16:06.760
<v Speaker 7>very easy to beat expectations. We a few weeks ago

0:16:06.960 --> 0:16:10.200
<v Speaker 7>wrote a few pieces on the company that were less

0:16:10.240 --> 0:16:14.600
<v Speaker 7>positive in terms of just the path forward to liquidity

0:16:14.640 --> 0:16:19.680
<v Speaker 7>and to the ability to sort of execute on this

0:16:19.760 --> 0:16:20.760
<v Speaker 7>turnaround that they're doing.

0:16:22.320 --> 0:16:25.240
<v Speaker 2>So talk a little bit about the unusual way that

0:16:25.320 --> 0:16:29.240
<v Speaker 2>they're going to achieve this turnaround because they had a

0:16:29.320 --> 0:16:32.960
<v Speaker 2>debt raise, but they also sold shares that allow people

0:16:33.040 --> 0:16:37.440
<v Speaker 2>to short it. I didn't quite understand it, but bottom line,

0:16:37.480 --> 0:16:38.520
<v Speaker 2>they needed money.

0:16:39.720 --> 0:16:40.560
<v Speaker 3>Right Scarlett.

0:16:40.600 --> 0:16:44.320
<v Speaker 7>It was not the most attractive of situations. It basically

0:16:44.360 --> 0:16:48.840
<v Speaker 7>pushed unsecured holders down further in the capital structure, and

0:16:48.880 --> 0:16:54.440
<v Speaker 7>it's a convertible note that is senior, and then also

0:16:54.760 --> 0:16:57.880
<v Speaker 7>had that ability that people could hedge or they could

0:16:57.920 --> 0:17:00.840
<v Speaker 7>short it. They weren't actually receiving any of the proceeds

0:17:00.880 --> 0:17:05.040
<v Speaker 7>from issuing additional shares. They only received a nominal amount

0:17:05.040 --> 0:17:08.679
<v Speaker 7>of money from the banks that did the offering, and

0:17:08.720 --> 0:17:11.600
<v Speaker 7>so that was that was one of those situations that

0:17:11.640 --> 0:17:13.480
<v Speaker 7>you kind of scratch your head and you say, okay,

0:17:13.680 --> 0:17:16.680
<v Speaker 7>about a year ago, the company's equity actually did really

0:17:16.760 --> 0:17:19.440
<v Speaker 7>well because you had a few activists involved in the company,

0:17:19.720 --> 0:17:21.880
<v Speaker 7>and at that time they could have in theory issued

0:17:21.960 --> 0:17:24.800
<v Speaker 7>equity and gotten some money for it. Here they were

0:17:24.840 --> 0:17:29.160
<v Speaker 7>doing it for free. Now, what's sort of interesting about

0:17:29.240 --> 0:17:33.600
<v Speaker 7>Hurts is that they've done a few senior convertible bond

0:17:33.760 --> 0:17:37.320
<v Speaker 7>offerings over the past year and a half years. And

0:17:37.800 --> 0:17:38.640
<v Speaker 7>the capital.

0:17:38.320 --> 0:17:39.560
<v Speaker 4>Structure is just ugly.

0:17:39.760 --> 0:17:42.960
<v Speaker 7>It's not one that makes you write home to mom about.

0:17:43.560 --> 0:17:46.520
<v Speaker 5>So I'm looking at the capital structure that's it's definitely ugly.

0:17:46.640 --> 0:17:49.879
<v Speaker 5>So and there's really no cash flow with no EBIT thought. Here,

0:17:49.880 --> 0:17:51.919
<v Speaker 5>they used to crank out three four billion dollars of

0:17:51.920 --> 0:17:54.960
<v Speaker 5>EBI thought per year, now just a couple of hundred.

0:17:55.320 --> 0:17:56.320
<v Speaker 3>What happened.

0:17:57.760 --> 0:18:01.119
<v Speaker 7>What didn't happen? Pop So in twenty twenty two, we

0:18:01.600 --> 0:18:03.680
<v Speaker 7>sort of said that twenty twenty two was the best

0:18:03.720 --> 0:18:06.400
<v Speaker 7>it was going to be for both Hurts and Avis,

0:18:06.880 --> 0:18:09.880
<v Speaker 7>and they hit peaks in terms of even that generation.

0:18:10.240 --> 0:18:12.119
<v Speaker 7>And that was a combination of coming off of the

0:18:12.160 --> 0:18:16.800
<v Speaker 7>pandemic of people revenge spending, of them being able to

0:18:17.760 --> 0:18:21.719
<v Speaker 7>access use vehicles at such a rate that was more attractive,

0:18:21.840 --> 0:18:27.439
<v Speaker 7>and also they had significantly reduced their fleets at an

0:18:27.480 --> 0:18:30.919
<v Speaker 7>attractive rate, and Hurts had come back from or structuring.

0:18:31.440 --> 0:18:34.880
<v Speaker 7>Now after twenty twenty two, they both said, oh, let's

0:18:35.000 --> 0:18:38.720
<v Speaker 7>give some money back to shareholders by way of buybacks,

0:18:38.800 --> 0:18:40.240
<v Speaker 7>and after that.

0:18:40.200 --> 0:18:41.480
<v Speaker 3>It's gotten worse and worse.

0:18:41.560 --> 0:18:44.960
<v Speaker 7>Now Hurts of course had a couple of hiccups. They've

0:18:45.040 --> 0:18:47.960
<v Speaker 7>definitely been a little bit more experimental than Avus and

0:18:48.040 --> 0:18:49.680
<v Speaker 7>in terms of what they've tried to do to right

0:18:49.720 --> 0:18:54.600
<v Speaker 7>side the business or attract customers attract investors. One of

0:18:54.640 --> 0:18:57.439
<v Speaker 7>them was when they bought into Tesla and Evs and

0:18:57.480 --> 0:19:01.160
<v Speaker 7>they didn't understand that if your visiting a national park

0:19:01.240 --> 0:19:05.280
<v Speaker 7>in Wyoming, you're not necessarily comfortable having a Tesla, So

0:19:05.480 --> 0:19:07.679
<v Speaker 7>having a lot of Tesla's in your fleet might not

0:19:07.720 --> 0:19:12.160
<v Speaker 7>necessarily sit nicely with people, and so you had that.

0:19:12.359 --> 0:19:15.640
<v Speaker 7>Now fast forward, they're well past that. But they brought

0:19:15.680 --> 0:19:17.840
<v Speaker 7>in a new CEO and probably what you'd say is

0:19:17.880 --> 0:19:21.600
<v Speaker 7>the eleventh hour of needing this help. And while they

0:19:21.640 --> 0:19:24.760
<v Speaker 7>guide for positive Ebidad this year, I would sort of

0:19:24.840 --> 0:19:26.840
<v Speaker 7>argue that the path to get there is a little

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:31.520
<v Speaker 7>bit tenuous, particularly when they're dealing with auto recalls when

0:19:31.520 --> 0:19:34.919
<v Speaker 7>they're dealing with just these sort of hiccups that are unexpected.

0:19:35.119 --> 0:19:37.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I know a lot of people who actually bought

0:19:38.080 --> 0:19:41.040
<v Speaker 2>used Tesla's from Hurts Okay because they needed to get

0:19:41.119 --> 0:19:43.960
<v Speaker 2>rid of or trim down their fleet. Jody, before we

0:19:44.040 --> 0:19:46.120
<v Speaker 2>let you go, we got to ask you about six Flags,

0:19:46.520 --> 0:19:50.760
<v Speaker 2>the amusement park company, the water park operator. They reported results.

0:19:50.800 --> 0:19:54.119
<v Speaker 2>The stock is down eighteen percent. What are you looking

0:19:54.160 --> 0:19:56.000
<v Speaker 2>at from a credit perspective?

0:19:57.760 --> 0:20:00.400
<v Speaker 7>The scarlet. What's so interesting that six Flags is is

0:20:00.480 --> 0:20:04.119
<v Speaker 7>it definitely struck a little bit more positive tone in

0:20:04.160 --> 0:20:07.000
<v Speaker 7>my view when you look at the company on a

0:20:07.080 --> 0:20:09.479
<v Speaker 7>same park basis. By that we mean is that they

0:20:09.520 --> 0:20:11.320
<v Speaker 7>got rid of eight parks, so they sold seven and

0:20:11.359 --> 0:20:14.520
<v Speaker 7>they closed one last year, and so stripping out those

0:20:14.680 --> 0:20:18.280
<v Speaker 7>parks that aren't operating, it actually was relatively positive. Now,

0:20:18.280 --> 0:20:22.040
<v Speaker 7>there are caveats that, for instance, the adjusted EVADAD numbers,

0:20:22.080 --> 0:20:24.440
<v Speaker 7>they had a lot of non cash buybacks. There are

0:20:24.440 --> 0:20:27.040
<v Speaker 7>non cash add ins that somehow appeared out of nowhere

0:20:27.359 --> 0:20:31.040
<v Speaker 7>that they didn't have last year. And so you say, okay,

0:20:31.960 --> 0:20:33.840
<v Speaker 7>were those just sitting there and they were waiting for

0:20:33.840 --> 0:20:35.200
<v Speaker 7>a time to kind of plug them in I'm not

0:20:35.280 --> 0:20:40.640
<v Speaker 7>quite sure, but I think more importantly, they know they're

0:20:40.680 --> 0:20:43.840
<v Speaker 7>at a time when they can sort of see a

0:20:43.880 --> 0:20:47.080
<v Speaker 7>path forward. But I think the expectation is that with

0:20:47.160 --> 0:20:51.919
<v Speaker 7>the Canada wildfires, with consumer health being a little bit rocky,

0:20:52.520 --> 0:20:56.200
<v Speaker 7>that the sort of positives that we saw in second

0:20:56.280 --> 0:21:00.000
<v Speaker 7>quarter might not necessarily be sustainable. But from a liquidity perspective,

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:02.800
<v Speaker 7>if they did buy some additional time with their debt

0:21:02.800 --> 0:21:05.440
<v Speaker 7>issuance earlier this year, and with the fact that they're

0:21:05.440 --> 0:21:10.840
<v Speaker 7>able to meet their Georgia Park put payment which comes

0:21:10.880 --> 0:21:13.800
<v Speaker 7>to in a year or in January, I should say so,

0:21:14.119 --> 0:21:15.959
<v Speaker 7>there are some bright spots to it, but I think

0:21:16.000 --> 0:21:19.160
<v Speaker 7>it's really early stages, and so as a credit anast,

0:21:19.200 --> 0:21:22.800
<v Speaker 7>they still can't sit comfortably with the name. But I

0:21:22.920 --> 0:21:25.600
<v Speaker 7>do see a scenario when they could get there. Now.

0:21:25.640 --> 0:21:28.800
<v Speaker 7>Four times net leverage target is a little bit far fetched,

0:21:29.119 --> 0:21:32.320
<v Speaker 7>something we've heard before from prior management, and not something

0:21:32.359 --> 0:21:33.360
<v Speaker 7>we see anytime soon.

0:21:34.640 --> 0:21:37.520
<v Speaker 2>Stay with us more from Bloomberg Intelligence coming up after this.

0:21:41.680 --> 0:21:45.359
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:21:45.440 --> 0:21:48.560
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple, Cocklay and Android

0:21:48.560 --> 0:21:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand wherever

0:21:51.920 --> 0:21:55.040
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:21:55.920 --> 0:21:59.000
<v Speaker 5>We had some restaurant and numbers come out. Restaurant brands say,

0:21:59.040 --> 0:22:03.119
<v Speaker 5>it'll own a whole bunch of different brands like Burger King,

0:22:03.280 --> 0:22:06.800
<v Speaker 5>Tim Hortons, Popeyes, all kinds of brands there, and they

0:22:06.800 --> 0:22:08.760
<v Speaker 5>reported some numbers that kind of beat estimates. So some

0:22:08.800 --> 0:22:12.000
<v Speaker 5>pretty solid numbers there. I think Burger Can actually did

0:22:12.040 --> 0:22:15.040
<v Speaker 5>well as well. Michael Haylen joins his senior restaurant and

0:22:15.080 --> 0:22:17.800
<v Speaker 5>food service analysts for Bloomberg Intelligence. Hey, Mike, talk to

0:22:17.880 --> 0:22:20.240
<v Speaker 5>us about food restaurant brands. What did you What do

0:22:20.320 --> 0:22:21.960
<v Speaker 5>we learn about the restaurant business today?

0:22:23.840 --> 0:22:24.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it was a good report.

0:22:24.920 --> 0:22:28.640
<v Speaker 8>You know, Burger King US, you know, had a great

0:22:28.720 --> 0:22:31.359
<v Speaker 8>comp high cycle digit comp Man, they're doing a really

0:22:31.440 --> 0:22:35.560
<v Speaker 8>nice job. They are taking to share in service business

0:22:35.640 --> 0:22:40.040
<v Speaker 8>here in the United States. International, which has been very

0:22:40.040 --> 0:22:43.600
<v Speaker 8>strong for this company for for quite some time, continues

0:22:43.640 --> 0:22:48.360
<v Speaker 8>to do really well with you know, just newer restaurants

0:22:48.440 --> 0:22:54.119
<v Speaker 8>and less competition overseas. But you know, Tim Hortons was

0:22:54.160 --> 0:22:56.960
<v Speaker 8>about flat. You know that that that chain has done

0:22:57.000 --> 0:22:59.399
<v Speaker 8>really well in Canada for the last two years and

0:22:59.440 --> 0:23:02.480
<v Speaker 8>now it's it's it's lapping some difficult comparisons, and so

0:23:03.760 --> 0:23:05.440
<v Speaker 8>the street might have liked to see a little bit

0:23:05.440 --> 0:23:09.040
<v Speaker 8>better result there, and Popeyes continues to struggle.

0:23:09.119 --> 0:23:11.200
<v Speaker 6>So as we see.

0:23:11.040 --> 0:23:15.879
<v Speaker 8>Quite often with these multi brand companies. You know, not

0:23:16.440 --> 0:23:21.440
<v Speaker 8>all chains are firing at firing at the same time,

0:23:21.520 --> 0:23:25.359
<v Speaker 8>but you know, generally with the Burger King and International

0:23:25.480 --> 0:23:29.120
<v Speaker 8>doing well, and then with the refranchising of Burger King,

0:23:29.160 --> 0:23:31.440
<v Speaker 8>restaurants here in the United States are seeing some pretty

0:23:31.440 --> 0:23:34.240
<v Speaker 8>good ebadam margin expansion. So I'd say overall, it's a

0:23:34.240 --> 0:23:35.040
<v Speaker 8>pretty good report.

0:23:35.760 --> 0:23:38.719
<v Speaker 2>And of course I like the restaurant brands ticker it's QSR,

0:23:38.880 --> 0:23:43.320
<v Speaker 2>short for quick service Restaurants. Michael, How do Burger King

0:23:43.440 --> 0:23:46.520
<v Speaker 2>zumbers in particular compare against McDonald's, which came out with

0:23:46.800 --> 0:23:49.280
<v Speaker 2>results earlier this week and we're kind of disappointing to

0:23:49.320 --> 0:23:53.800
<v Speaker 2>the point where they needed to change leadership as well.

0:23:54.000 --> 0:23:57.240
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, and I think there's there's when you see McDonald's

0:23:57.280 --> 0:24:02.280
<v Speaker 8>slow that tends to help other QSR chains. But you know,

0:24:02.520 --> 0:24:05.520
<v Speaker 8>I would suggest most of this gain here at Burger

0:24:05.600 --> 0:24:09.120
<v Speaker 8>King is due to the changes that they've made over

0:24:09.160 --> 0:24:13.639
<v Speaker 8>the last few years. Patrick Doyle, chairman of the board,

0:24:13.880 --> 0:24:17.000
<v Speaker 8>You know, brought into this chain some years ago and

0:24:17.320 --> 0:24:21.040
<v Speaker 8>has done a really good job of mentoring the management

0:24:21.080 --> 0:24:25.240
<v Speaker 8>team and helping them turn that business around.

0:24:25.440 --> 0:24:25.679
<v Speaker 6>You know.

0:24:26.880 --> 0:24:29.400
<v Speaker 8>You know, one thing I thought was interesting that McDonald's

0:24:29.400 --> 0:24:31.880
<v Speaker 8>mentioned on their call was that they need to get

0:24:31.920 --> 0:24:35.760
<v Speaker 8>more families back in the stores. And you know, it

0:24:35.840 --> 0:24:39.399
<v Speaker 8>sure seems like they mentioned that because Burger King seems

0:24:39.440 --> 0:24:42.680
<v Speaker 8>to be taking some share there. They pointed out how

0:24:42.720 --> 0:24:47.080
<v Speaker 8>strong hids meal growth was over the last year, and

0:24:47.200 --> 0:24:51.720
<v Speaker 8>so Burger King really seems to be firing all cylinders here.

0:24:51.720 --> 0:24:54.760
<v Speaker 8>There was a lot of opportunity to improve the quality

0:24:54.760 --> 0:24:57.040
<v Speaker 8>of the stores, which they're doing with the remodels, to

0:24:57.440 --> 0:25:00.960
<v Speaker 8>improve the quality of the product, which they've done with

0:25:01.040 --> 0:25:04.359
<v Speaker 8>the Whopper, and you know, now they're really focused on

0:25:04.800 --> 0:25:06.800
<v Speaker 8>the operations and getting people in and out of the

0:25:06.840 --> 0:25:07.520
<v Speaker 8>store quickly.

0:25:07.800 --> 0:25:09.480
<v Speaker 3>Okay, speaking of Burger Joints.

0:25:10.280 --> 0:25:14.280
<v Speaker 2>Yesterday, Starboard Value CEO Jeff Smith was on Bloomberg Deals,

0:25:14.680 --> 0:25:17.840
<v Speaker 2>telling Danny Berger exclusively that the firm has built a

0:25:17.840 --> 0:25:21.320
<v Speaker 2>new stake in Shakeshack and he described himself as probably

0:25:21.320 --> 0:25:26.760
<v Speaker 2>the biggest single shareholder in the company active shareholder, describing

0:25:26.720 --> 0:25:28.800
<v Speaker 2>it as a great undervalued brand and kind of what

0:25:28.840 --> 0:25:32.320
<v Speaker 2>he wants to see, is more franchising domestically you've been

0:25:32.359 --> 0:25:33.240
<v Speaker 2>looking at Shakeshack.

0:25:33.400 --> 0:25:35.520
<v Speaker 3>Is this something that can be done quickly?

0:25:37.240 --> 0:25:42.520
<v Speaker 8>No, this is something This is really interesting because you know, hey,

0:25:42.640 --> 0:25:46.400
<v Speaker 8>I would say this is not the standard activist playbook.

0:25:46.440 --> 0:25:50.480
<v Speaker 8>The playbook is typically find a management team that's been underperforming,

0:25:50.880 --> 0:25:55.480
<v Speaker 8>replace them, and get the core business running more effectively

0:25:56.480 --> 0:25:58.919
<v Speaker 8>before you start to accelerate growth.

0:25:59.119 --> 0:25:59.359
<v Speaker 5>Right.

0:25:59.440 --> 0:26:02.080
<v Speaker 8>And so we see a chain here with with some

0:26:02.080 --> 0:26:05.560
<v Speaker 8>some headwinds and some issues, and that isn't part of

0:26:05.640 --> 0:26:06.840
<v Speaker 8>their formula this time.

0:26:06.920 --> 0:26:07.000
<v Speaker 6>Right.

0:26:07.080 --> 0:26:11.560
<v Speaker 8>They hired Rob Lynch at Papa John some years ago

0:26:11.600 --> 0:26:13.000
<v Speaker 8>when they were involved in that stock.

0:26:13.080 --> 0:26:14.440
<v Speaker 3>So that's that's the first.

0:26:14.200 --> 0:26:16.639
<v Speaker 8>Thing that was kind of interesting. The second part is

0:26:16.680 --> 0:26:20.000
<v Speaker 8>franchising is a completely different muscle. Right. This is not

0:26:20.160 --> 0:26:22.840
<v Speaker 8>something that you can just you know, you wake up

0:26:22.840 --> 0:26:26.120
<v Speaker 8>one day and decide to do and people just line

0:26:26.200 --> 0:26:29.320
<v Speaker 8>up in open stores, right Like, this is a completely

0:26:29.320 --> 0:26:32.960
<v Speaker 8>new muscle. It's a relationship and a marketing business. They're

0:26:32.960 --> 0:26:37.199
<v Speaker 8>going to have to hire corporate corporate team members to

0:26:37.320 --> 0:26:40.080
<v Speaker 8>actually grow this business. And then it's not something that's

0:26:40.080 --> 0:26:42.880
<v Speaker 8>going to hit the P and L for eighteen months, right,

0:26:42.960 --> 0:26:49.240
<v Speaker 8>So it takes about that long to get restaurants approved, permitted, approved,

0:26:49.280 --> 0:26:53.919
<v Speaker 8>and built, you know. And so this is a really

0:26:54.040 --> 0:26:57.359
<v Speaker 8>curious investment in our view, because who knows what the

0:26:57.400 --> 0:26:59.679
<v Speaker 8>restaurant in business is going to look like eighteen that's

0:26:59.760 --> 0:27:02.960
<v Speaker 8>right from now when this catalyst actually starts to kick.

0:27:02.800 --> 0:27:05.600
<v Speaker 5>In thirty seconds, Mike, when is In and Out Burger

0:27:05.600 --> 0:27:06.399
<v Speaker 5>are gonna be public?

0:27:08.960 --> 0:27:12.200
<v Speaker 8>Last I've heard is that that is not what they

0:27:12.240 --> 0:27:12.800
<v Speaker 8>want to do.

0:27:13.800 --> 0:27:18.480
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:27:18.680 --> 0:27:22.160
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each

0:27:22.160 --> 0:27:25.960
<v Speaker 1>weekday ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:27:26.040 --> 0:27:29.600
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:27:30.000 --> 0:27:32.960
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:27:33.320 --> 0:27:35.560
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal