WEBVTT - 2014 re-draft & Daniel Jeremiah

0:00:00.920 --> 0:00:05.600
<v Speaker 1>The Around the NFL Podcast would be a good bit

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:09.799
<v Speaker 1>for Chip Kelly's offense. Welcome to another edition of the

0:00:09.920 --> 0:00:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Around the NFL Podcast. I'm Greg Rosenthal alongside a couple

0:00:14.120 --> 0:00:20.040
<v Speaker 1>of heroes, Mark Sessler and Chris Westling. Hey, Greg, see

0:00:20.800 --> 0:00:23.080
<v Speaker 1>I get no respect? What a pause between that? Yes?

0:00:23.360 --> 0:00:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Of course. If you'll notice our fearless host Dan Handas

0:00:27.080 --> 0:00:30.320
<v Speaker 1>not here today, Happy birthday to day in hand this,

0:00:30.520 --> 0:00:32.839
<v Speaker 1>he gave himself a big birthday present and that was

0:00:32.880 --> 0:00:36.280
<v Speaker 1>staying away from us. Who can blame him? Listen, I'll

0:00:36.320 --> 0:00:39.199
<v Speaker 1>tell you what it's been hot in this studio. Came

0:00:39.280 --> 0:00:41.720
<v Speaker 1>up here about ten minutes ago while TV was fiddling

0:00:41.760 --> 0:00:45.360
<v Speaker 1>around the controls behind the glass, and the heat between

0:00:45.520 --> 0:00:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Rosenthal and west is uncomfortable. Hold on here, you're distancing

0:00:51.040 --> 0:00:54.000
<v Speaker 1>yourself from this? Yes, well, it really started as Mark

0:00:54.120 --> 0:00:59.160
<v Speaker 1>and west arguing about a Josh McCown versus Zach Mettenberger

0:00:59.200 --> 0:01:02.480
<v Speaker 1>who would you rather have? And then it really kick

0:01:02.600 --> 0:01:06.600
<v Speaker 1>started a week long argument that really has threatened to

0:01:06.680 --> 0:01:10.399
<v Speaker 1>tear apart the Around the NFL group about Zach Mettenberger

0:01:10.440 --> 0:01:12.680
<v Speaker 1>between Chris Wesley and myself, which we're really going to

0:01:12.800 --> 0:01:16.480
<v Speaker 1>dive into a little more later in this show. You're excited. Yeah,

0:01:16.520 --> 0:01:19.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure listeners are just hanging on waiting for the

0:01:19.480 --> 0:01:22.840
<v Speaker 1>extra Zach Mettenberger analysis. Well, it's late April. Let's show us.

0:01:22.920 --> 0:01:27.120
<v Speaker 1>You know this heat the scientist eat or any arguments

0:01:27.120 --> 0:01:31.040
<v Speaker 1>between us is you know, not really just manufactured. We're

0:01:31.080 --> 0:01:33.240
<v Speaker 1>talking about whether we're on the podcast or not. I

0:01:33.280 --> 0:01:35.720
<v Speaker 1>guarantee right now Dan Is, when he's listening to this,

0:01:35.800 --> 0:01:39.040
<v Speaker 1>he's like, not enough birthday talk about Dan. We've got

0:01:39.040 --> 0:01:42.600
<v Speaker 1>to talk more about that aspect. Big three five for Danny.

0:01:42.640 --> 0:01:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Oh really, that's a big one. I guess at this point,

0:01:46.520 --> 0:01:50.440
<v Speaker 1>does it really matter he can officially run for US president. Well,

0:01:50.480 --> 0:01:53.320
<v Speaker 1>we will call Dan hands Is a little bit later,

0:01:53.400 --> 0:01:55.480
<v Speaker 1>see if he's there. He doesn't know we're gonna do this,

0:01:55.520 --> 0:01:59.440
<v Speaker 1>so he might not answer. We'll see what happens. He might. Yeah,

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:02.000
<v Speaker 1>we gotta big show. I mean, we got that. We

0:02:02.040 --> 0:02:05.920
<v Speaker 1>are gonna talk about a little series we're doing re

0:02:06.960 --> 0:02:10.720
<v Speaker 1>drafting and ranking the class of two thousand and fourteen

0:02:11.000 --> 0:02:13.840
<v Speaker 1>draft at different positions. Okay, you know, if we get

0:02:13.880 --> 0:02:16.360
<v Speaker 1>all the draft knicks out there they're studying in all

0:02:16.400 --> 0:02:18.120
<v Speaker 1>the college tape, what about the guys that are actually

0:02:18.200 --> 0:02:21.480
<v Speaker 1>in the league. Let's revisit him a year later, get

0:02:21.480 --> 0:02:24.640
<v Speaker 1>our you know, studying on West did a huge, great

0:02:24.639 --> 0:02:27.320
<v Speaker 1>piece on the wide receivers, one of the best classes

0:02:27.320 --> 0:02:30.320
<v Speaker 1>of all time, maybe the best. I am putting out

0:02:30.360 --> 0:02:33.280
<v Speaker 1>one on the quarterbacks and Mark has the tight end,

0:02:33.320 --> 0:02:37.840
<v Speaker 1>so we'll talk about that a little later. Tight ends. Hey,

0:02:38.040 --> 0:02:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Jason Morrow as a person too, and uh, we also

0:02:41.360 --> 0:02:44.120
<v Speaker 1>have Daniel Jeremiah on the show. With the NFL Draft

0:02:44.639 --> 0:02:47.959
<v Speaker 1>only a week away, we're gonna talk to DJ. Dan

0:02:48.120 --> 0:02:51.600
<v Speaker 1>was here. We pre taped that on Wednesday, and we're

0:02:51.600 --> 0:02:55.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna talk a little draft. Get some knowledge from Danna Jeremiah.

0:02:55.520 --> 0:02:57.960
<v Speaker 1>He had he has another pot. He does something else here, right,

0:02:59.560 --> 0:03:02.120
<v Speaker 1>he does well the Stake's podcast. Check it up. You

0:03:02.160 --> 0:03:04.080
<v Speaker 1>get to the draft talk. I stayed out of that

0:03:04.160 --> 0:03:07.240
<v Speaker 1>segment and I'm not on it because DJ, you know,

0:03:07.600 --> 0:03:10.600
<v Speaker 1>he on Twitter got to me, said a little uncomfortable

0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:12.720
<v Speaker 1>to have to go up with the tape watching that

0:03:12.760 --> 0:03:15.359
<v Speaker 1>you've been doing on some of the defensive tackle prospects

0:03:15.400 --> 0:03:16.720
<v Speaker 1>in line. I said, I'll sit out. This will be

0:03:16.760 --> 0:03:19.120
<v Speaker 1>your thing, but yeah, well you have to listen. There

0:03:19.200 --> 0:03:22.920
<v Speaker 1>was some awkward moments between him and Dan Jansas that

0:03:23.120 --> 0:03:26.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't tell very bubbly DJ. On this episode, he

0:03:26.800 --> 0:03:28.560
<v Speaker 1>was excited to be here. Other than you know, they've

0:03:28.560 --> 0:03:30.720
<v Speaker 1>they've had the heat between Dan and uh. You know

0:03:30.760 --> 0:03:32.560
<v Speaker 1>there's heat between West and I. But of course there's

0:03:32.560 --> 0:03:34.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of love. I felt bad, really for you

0:03:34.280 --> 0:03:37.440
<v Speaker 1>last night when you almost lost your four thousand word

0:03:37.480 --> 0:03:42.080
<v Speaker 1>opus to the vagaries of your computer. You said you

0:03:42.120 --> 0:03:44.880
<v Speaker 1>were you were literally going to cry in the newsroom

0:03:44.920 --> 0:03:47.400
<v Speaker 1>by yourself at eight o'clock at night. And so when

0:03:47.440 --> 0:03:50.120
<v Speaker 1>I t guys saved you, I was five minutes away

0:03:50.160 --> 0:03:52.640
<v Speaker 1>from rolling into the fetal position and sucking my thumb

0:03:53.760 --> 0:03:57.000
<v Speaker 1>and just calling it quits on every on life. I mean,

0:03:57.000 --> 0:03:59.040
<v Speaker 1>it was just what did it just disappear into it?

0:03:59.160 --> 0:04:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Thought he lost the whole I hit a button called

0:04:01.240 --> 0:04:05.480
<v Speaker 1>save draft, and four thousand words up and disappeared. That

0:04:05.640 --> 0:04:08.240
<v Speaker 1>is a horror movie for a writer, basically, just I

0:04:08.280 --> 0:04:11.720
<v Speaker 1>mean it was hopeless, especially a week and a half

0:04:11.760 --> 0:04:16.599
<v Speaker 1>of film watching, research, note taking, and then crafting the words.

0:04:16.600 --> 0:04:18.960
<v Speaker 1>I went the way I want them all out the window?

0:04:19.040 --> 0:04:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Are you here right now? Like I will still be,

0:04:21.000 --> 0:04:24.159
<v Speaker 1>I will still be. He got back recaptured after like

0:04:24.200 --> 0:04:26.919
<v Speaker 1>a couple of hours, Like they were like oh, you

0:04:27.040 --> 0:04:30.480
<v Speaker 1>just have to email word Press and figure it out,

0:04:30.520 --> 0:04:33.359
<v Speaker 1>because we can't figure anything. It's called different levels of

0:04:33.400 --> 0:04:36.279
<v Speaker 1>work ethic. That's why he's here. I mean, yeah, he

0:04:36.320 --> 0:04:38.640
<v Speaker 1>wasn't messing around. He went and watched this his San

0:04:38.680 --> 0:04:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Antonio Spurs West is my beloved San Antony he key

0:04:41.960 --> 0:04:44.400
<v Speaker 1>big Spurs fan. And then you know, finished the column

0:04:44.640 --> 0:04:46.560
<v Speaker 1>after that. So we'll get to all that later. But

0:04:46.880 --> 0:04:49.880
<v Speaker 1>good game. It was until the Spurs started with that

0:04:49.920 --> 0:04:53.560
<v Speaker 1>hack crap. How about this a little basketball te Mark

0:04:53.600 --> 0:04:55.839
<v Speaker 1>and I are clueless. I'm trying to follow. I'm following.

0:04:55.839 --> 0:04:58.040
<v Speaker 1>We all like the it and I like it. I'm

0:04:58.120 --> 0:05:00.359
<v Speaker 1>following it. All right, let's do a little news. I

0:05:00.440 --> 0:05:05.640
<v Speaker 1>told him to keep his shirt on. Uh that is

0:05:05.960 --> 0:05:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Barry Obama if you missed it at the White House.

0:05:09.560 --> 0:05:11.920
<v Speaker 1>I love Barack Obama. I'm gonna told him to keep

0:05:11.920 --> 0:05:15.760
<v Speaker 1>his shirt on. I've gotta miss I'm gonna miss it.

0:05:15.839 --> 0:05:18.320
<v Speaker 1>You know you can. I don't care what politics you

0:05:18.360 --> 0:05:20.680
<v Speaker 1>have or whatever. You gotta like the singers that Obama

0:05:20.680 --> 0:05:23.680
<v Speaker 1>always comes up with. You don't really like him as

0:05:23.720 --> 0:05:26.320
<v Speaker 1>much as his comedy writers. Well, I love I did

0:05:26.360 --> 0:05:28.200
<v Speaker 1>say he's got a great comedy writers. I mean, his

0:05:28.279 --> 0:05:31.520
<v Speaker 1>best line today was that, you know, he was he

0:05:31.640 --> 0:05:34.960
<v Speaker 1>usually makes a lot of jokes, um, but you know

0:05:35.040 --> 0:05:37.200
<v Speaker 1>he was worried today with the Patriots in town that

0:05:37.240 --> 0:05:41.120
<v Speaker 1>eleven of twelve could fall flat. You know, that's pretty good.

0:05:41.320 --> 0:05:44.160
<v Speaker 1>The newsroom generally found that to be a funny joke.

0:05:44.720 --> 0:05:46.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, he took on blotch. I guess. So he's

0:05:46.560 --> 0:05:49.920
<v Speaker 1>saying his delivery is good. He's he's good at delivery. Absolutely,

0:05:49.960 --> 0:05:52.680
<v Speaker 1>I'll give him whatever. I mean, he's will he follows

0:05:52.680 --> 0:05:54.880
<v Speaker 1>sports two care So it was fun. We're not really

0:05:54.920 --> 0:05:56.360
<v Speaker 1>going to talk about the White House that We'll talk

0:05:56.400 --> 0:05:59.559
<v Speaker 1>about some real news. And it dropped yesterday that Greg Hardy,

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:04.520
<v Speaker 1>now of the Dallas Cowboys ten game suspension for violating

0:06:05.520 --> 0:06:09.520
<v Speaker 1>the league's conduct policy and really various offenses, uh, the

0:06:10.279 --> 0:06:14.320
<v Speaker 1>new personal conduct policy that includes domestic violence, a bigger

0:06:14.360 --> 0:06:17.600
<v Speaker 1>suspension than a lot of people expected. Do you think

0:06:17.640 --> 0:06:20.200
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys would have still made this signing if they

0:06:20.240 --> 0:06:23.039
<v Speaker 1>knew he was gonna be suspended ten games. That's a

0:06:23.040 --> 0:06:26.919
<v Speaker 1>good question, because his salary makes a lot more sense

0:06:26.960 --> 0:06:29.480
<v Speaker 1>now that he's been suspended ten games, because he was

0:06:29.520 --> 0:06:31.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna you know, it was built his thirteen million over

0:06:31.960 --> 0:06:34.920
<v Speaker 1>sixteen games. So now it seems more in line with

0:06:35.440 --> 0:06:37.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, the fact that he's gonna miss most of

0:06:37.960 --> 0:06:40.560
<v Speaker 1>the season. I mean, the contract now looks like you said,

0:06:40.600 --> 0:06:44.040
<v Speaker 1>real smart, And I normally would say, at this point,

0:06:44.080 --> 0:06:45.760
<v Speaker 1>you know what, there's still a ton of football to

0:06:45.800 --> 0:06:48.080
<v Speaker 1>go with six games left, and I think this can

0:06:48.120 --> 0:06:50.039
<v Speaker 1>work out. And it can, except you are talking about

0:06:50.040 --> 0:06:51.839
<v Speaker 1>a guy that at this point would not have played

0:06:51.880 --> 0:06:55.800
<v Speaker 1>for what straight regular season games. They did play that

0:06:55.880 --> 0:06:58.440
<v Speaker 1>one week one game, which was so weird last year.

0:06:58.520 --> 0:07:01.960
<v Speaker 1>That's where I came to fifteen plus ten. That's right.

0:07:03.200 --> 0:07:04.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what I was thinking there, you go,

0:07:04.760 --> 0:07:11.480
<v Speaker 1>scientist what not? A mathematician? It is. I think that

0:07:11.520 --> 0:07:14.760
<v Speaker 1>the contract, I guess was smart because it was per game.

0:07:14.920 --> 0:07:18.920
<v Speaker 1>But they still, as Ian Rappaport, our NFL Media Insider reported,

0:07:19.120 --> 0:07:21.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, they were thinking it's gonna be anywhere from

0:07:21.320 --> 0:07:23.400
<v Speaker 1>two to four to six. So this is a big

0:07:23.400 --> 0:07:26.760
<v Speaker 1>surprise to them, and they don't have, um, you know,

0:07:26.800 --> 0:07:30.040
<v Speaker 1>pass rushers on that team. I also wasn't surprised on

0:07:30.200 --> 0:07:32.960
<v Speaker 1>in a certain you know, vantage point, because this is

0:07:33.000 --> 0:07:35.560
<v Speaker 1>the post ray Rice world. It's a different world in

0:07:35.640 --> 0:07:38.320
<v Speaker 1>the NFL. And Greg Hardy is kind of the foremost

0:07:38.360 --> 0:07:41.440
<v Speaker 1>example of that. So for them to come down very

0:07:41.480 --> 0:07:44.920
<v Speaker 1>hard on him isn't totally shocking. Well, there's two sides

0:07:44.960 --> 0:07:47.120
<v Speaker 1>to every story. But if what he is alleged to

0:07:47.160 --> 0:07:49.640
<v Speaker 1>have done is true, I have no problem with this,

0:07:49.840 --> 0:07:52.000
<v Speaker 1>of course, Yeah, I think most don't. And like the league,

0:07:52.200 --> 0:07:54.360
<v Speaker 1>one thing is, no matter what they do, you take

0:07:54.360 --> 0:07:56.920
<v Speaker 1>a hard stance like this, they're gonna get attacked on

0:07:56.920 --> 0:08:00.160
<v Speaker 1>Twitter for whatever this was, and they get attack. Did

0:08:00.160 --> 0:08:02.160
<v Speaker 1>they take two weakest stance? And I think that Dave.

0:08:03.200 --> 0:08:05.680
<v Speaker 1>For all the attacking the NFL gets and all the heat,

0:08:05.720 --> 0:08:07.240
<v Speaker 1>I think they kind of stuck to the guns here

0:08:07.280 --> 0:08:10.880
<v Speaker 1>with this one. No bad pun intended there. Uh. The

0:08:10.960 --> 0:08:13.920
<v Speaker 1>only the only problem with Greg Hardy getting ten games

0:08:13.960 --> 0:08:16.200
<v Speaker 1>is that it wouldn't surprise me if it gets reduced

0:08:16.680 --> 0:08:18.840
<v Speaker 1>because he missed last year and he was paid. It

0:08:18.920 --> 0:08:22.600
<v Speaker 1>was not a suspension. But the NFL, they know it

0:08:22.680 --> 0:08:24.760
<v Speaker 1>more than anyone else. Are there in a bad streak

0:08:24.840 --> 0:08:27.960
<v Speaker 1>right now with these appeals. Yeah, they've gotten some things overturned.

0:08:28.600 --> 0:08:31.480
<v Speaker 1>Ray Rice was it was an issue Adrian Peterson's happened

0:08:31.480 --> 0:08:33.720
<v Speaker 1>in court. So this isn't really the end of this story.

0:08:34.120 --> 0:08:37.239
<v Speaker 1>Let's move on to the field, where the Miami Dolphins

0:08:37.720 --> 0:08:41.760
<v Speaker 1>uh continued their off season spending by going after Greg Jennings,

0:08:41.800 --> 0:08:45.520
<v Speaker 1>signing the wide receiver ultimately to play replace Brian Hartline.

0:08:45.520 --> 0:08:47.079
<v Speaker 1>I guess kind of for that that spot in the

0:08:47.120 --> 0:08:50.880
<v Speaker 1>lineup slide up grade. I think Greg Jennings has spent

0:08:51.000 --> 0:08:52.640
<v Speaker 1>most of the last two years in the slot, but

0:08:52.760 --> 0:08:56.400
<v Speaker 1>that's Jarvis Landry's position in Miami, so I guess, and

0:08:56.400 --> 0:08:59.360
<v Speaker 1>he's playing the Z or or the X there. But yeah,

0:08:59.800 --> 0:09:01.959
<v Speaker 1>i've he's an upgrade on the heartline. How much money

0:09:01.960 --> 0:09:05.960
<v Speaker 1>did you get? Was it for eight two years? Eight million,

0:09:06.000 --> 0:09:09.679
<v Speaker 1>which probably means the only year guaranteed is the first year,

0:09:09.679 --> 0:09:11.200
<v Speaker 1>and it's you know, probably three and a half or

0:09:11.240 --> 0:09:15.200
<v Speaker 1>four similar money to your boy heartline. Yeah, I mean,

0:09:15.240 --> 0:09:19.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that hardline is gonna change events in Cleveland,

0:09:19.160 --> 0:09:21.360
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think Greg Jennings is gonna completely change

0:09:21.400 --> 0:09:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Miami's But for late April and what was left, not

0:09:24.320 --> 0:09:27.000
<v Speaker 1>a bad signing for the Dolphins. They needed veteran healthy

0:09:27.000 --> 0:09:30.280
<v Speaker 1>other all young guys, Yeah, Kenny Stills, Jervis Landry or

0:09:30.320 --> 0:09:33.360
<v Speaker 1>Shard Matthews. Now Greg Jennings. I don't think this precludes

0:09:33.440 --> 0:09:35.920
<v Speaker 1>them from drafting an early round wide receiver. No way,

0:09:35.960 --> 0:09:38.840
<v Speaker 1>by any stretch, he'll play for them, though. You know

0:09:38.880 --> 0:09:41.280
<v Speaker 1>when I watched them, when I watched the Teddy Bridgewater

0:09:42.480 --> 0:09:44.920
<v Speaker 1>tape lately, he didn't look like he was done by

0:09:44.920 --> 0:09:47.040
<v Speaker 1>any means. No, I think he had some place after

0:09:47.080 --> 0:09:49.480
<v Speaker 1>the catchy. He just looked like he was missing a

0:09:49.520 --> 0:09:51.319
<v Speaker 1>little bit, and he he had a hard time getting

0:09:51.320 --> 0:09:53.719
<v Speaker 1>on the same page with Teddy bridge Riter really more

0:09:53.760 --> 0:09:56.320
<v Speaker 1>than the other receivers there. Yeah, he was outplayed by

0:09:56.400 --> 0:09:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Charles Johnson, but I I agree. I think Greg Jenny

0:09:58.840 --> 0:10:01.199
<v Speaker 1>still is a little bit left in the town. Marvin

0:10:01.320 --> 0:10:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Lewis has got another year left in the tank and

0:10:03.960 --> 0:10:06.720
<v Speaker 1>the bank account to another one year extension. He hasn't

0:10:06.760 --> 0:10:09.760
<v Speaker 1>won a playoff game his entire run in Cincinnati, but

0:10:09.880 --> 0:10:12.959
<v Speaker 1>he gets another contract extension. This is through two thousand

0:10:13.240 --> 0:10:16.360
<v Speaker 1>and sixteen. Connor Or wrote a good piece on the

0:10:16.400 --> 0:10:19.720
<v Speaker 1>five untouchable coaches in the NFL right now that haven't

0:10:19.760 --> 0:10:23.480
<v Speaker 1>necessarily had recent playoffs success, But it just seems like

0:10:23.520 --> 0:10:26.400
<v Speaker 1>they're almost untouchable. They're gonna keep their jobs if they

0:10:26.480 --> 0:10:29.640
<v Speaker 1>just keep their current level. And Marvin Lewis is one

0:10:29.640 --> 0:10:32.560
<v Speaker 1>of those guys. If you were a Bengals fan, Mark Sessler,

0:10:32.760 --> 0:10:35.520
<v Speaker 1>would you be happy about this move? Well, if I

0:10:35.559 --> 0:10:37.400
<v Speaker 1>were a Bengal, if I were still a Bengals fan

0:10:37.480 --> 0:10:40.440
<v Speaker 1>at this point, I would be very frustrated with Marvin Lewis.

0:10:40.480 --> 0:10:43.760
<v Speaker 1>I'd be very frustrated with his decisions at quarterback. And

0:10:43.880 --> 0:10:47.560
<v Speaker 1>basically it boils back down to Wes's boy Mike Brown.

0:10:48.000 --> 0:10:52.439
<v Speaker 1>Who Why is Marvin Lewis untouchable because apparently the Brown

0:10:52.520 --> 0:10:55.600
<v Speaker 1>family does not feel they need to upgrade this situation.

0:10:55.640 --> 0:10:57.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I don't know what you're gonna get. What

0:10:57.160 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 1>you get with Marvin Lewis, Well, this is a situation

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:04.200
<v Speaker 1>and where unless you are from Cincinnati and are very

0:11:04.200 --> 0:11:08.000
<v Speaker 1>familiar with how this this franchise runs, they're a mom

0:11:08.040 --> 0:11:10.360
<v Speaker 1>and pop operation. They don't run their franchise like the

0:11:10.360 --> 0:11:13.200
<v Speaker 1>other thirty one teams, and they have they have the

0:11:13.240 --> 0:11:16.720
<v Speaker 1>most secretive front office formula of any franchise in the league.

0:11:16.960 --> 0:11:19.880
<v Speaker 1>And what's happened is Mike Brown has seeded control to

0:11:19.920 --> 0:11:24.120
<v Speaker 1>a conglomerate of Marvin Lewis, sounds, Eva Duke Tobin, and

0:11:24.200 --> 0:11:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Katie Blackburn Brown and several other several other members of

0:11:27.559 --> 0:11:29.719
<v Speaker 1>the Brown family. So Marvin Lewis has a lot of

0:11:29.760 --> 0:11:32.800
<v Speaker 1>job security by being part of the personnel now like

0:11:32.880 --> 0:11:35.760
<v Speaker 1>he's in he's in the personnel department, and his coaches

0:11:35.800 --> 0:11:37.880
<v Speaker 1>are also have a big say in who they draft.

0:11:38.240 --> 0:11:39.640
<v Speaker 1>So I think that's a big part of it. And

0:11:39.679 --> 0:11:43.000
<v Speaker 1>if you I mean for perspective on on why Marvin

0:11:43.080 --> 0:11:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Lewis has been so successful. One ninety six and two

0:11:46.720 --> 0:11:49.600
<v Speaker 1>is his record, and since Mike Brown took over for

0:11:49.640 --> 0:11:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Paul Brown in all other Bengals coaches I believe are

0:11:53.280 --> 0:11:55.600
<v Speaker 1>fifty five and one forty six, which is a two

0:11:55.679 --> 0:11:59.040
<v Speaker 1>forty winning percentage. So Marvin Lewis has succeeded in an

0:11:59.080 --> 0:12:04.080
<v Speaker 1>operation where every other coach has failed tremendously. From another

0:12:04.120 --> 0:12:06.200
<v Speaker 1>angle that he could argue, we've been We've been to

0:12:06.200 --> 0:12:08.360
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs four straight years. Whether or not you like

0:12:08.480 --> 0:12:11.640
<v Speaker 1>Andy Dalton or you like Marvin Lewis, we're there. We

0:12:11.800 --> 0:12:14.600
<v Speaker 1>got a talented roster. It's not an absolute train wreck,

0:12:14.720 --> 0:12:18.200
<v Speaker 1>but it's just not there's nothing inspiring happening in Cincinnati. Well,

0:12:18.200 --> 0:12:20.480
<v Speaker 1>the other guys on Connor's list, Jeff Fisher, when was

0:12:20.480 --> 0:12:22.640
<v Speaker 1>the last time he made the playoffs? What's the last

0:12:22.679 --> 0:12:25.160
<v Speaker 1>time he didn't go seven and nine. This Sea last

0:12:25.240 --> 0:12:29.360
<v Speaker 1>year at six since then even worse. Uh, Tom Coughlin's

0:12:29.400 --> 0:12:30.880
<v Speaker 1>on that list. He's made the ploffs once in the

0:12:30.920 --> 0:12:33.320
<v Speaker 1>last six years. He's won two Super Bowls. I know,

0:12:33.640 --> 0:12:35.800
<v Speaker 1>I know, but I'm just saying he's under five hundred

0:12:35.880 --> 0:12:38.640
<v Speaker 1>over the last four years. Overall, he's made the playoffs

0:12:38.640 --> 0:12:41.199
<v Speaker 1>once in six years. Brad Childress has made the playoffs

0:12:41.360 --> 0:12:43.840
<v Speaker 1>as often as Tom Coughlin in the last six years.

0:12:43.840 --> 0:12:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Wade Phillips has made the playoffs as often. Todd Haley

0:12:47.080 --> 0:12:49.160
<v Speaker 1>has made the playoffs as often. I'm trying to think

0:12:49.200 --> 0:12:52.520
<v Speaker 1>of some other coaches. I don't know. Did Eric Studesville

0:12:52.600 --> 0:12:55.680
<v Speaker 1>make the playoffs for the Denver Broncos. Probably not, But

0:12:55.840 --> 0:12:58.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, at least Marvin Lewis to get to the

0:12:58.000 --> 0:13:00.360
<v Speaker 1>playoffs with the Bengals is in a comp push, man.

0:13:00.360 --> 0:13:02.520
<v Speaker 1>I think Marvin Lewis would be hired if he lost

0:13:02.520 --> 0:13:04.719
<v Speaker 1>that Bengals job by another team quickly. I don't think

0:13:04.720 --> 0:13:06.679
<v Speaker 1>he'd be hired as a head coach, really, I think

0:13:06.720 --> 0:13:08.680
<v Speaker 1>he'd be hired as a defensive coordinate. I think he

0:13:08.720 --> 0:13:11.000
<v Speaker 1>may be hired as a head coach depending on what

0:13:11.320 --> 0:13:13.720
<v Speaker 1>gaps were oute there. And you know when John Fox

0:13:13.760 --> 0:13:16.840
<v Speaker 1>got hired coming off a disastrous season, but I don't think.

0:13:17.559 --> 0:13:19.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't think Marvin Lewis is quite as respected as

0:13:19.920 --> 0:13:22.880
<v Speaker 1>John FOXX. I disagree. I think the way I think

0:13:22.880 --> 0:13:25.319
<v Speaker 1>he'd get a lot of points for winning in Cincinnati,

0:13:25.440 --> 0:13:29.000
<v Speaker 1>and look at the coaches he's hired. You know, Hugh Jackson,

0:13:29.320 --> 0:13:32.880
<v Speaker 1>he has good contacts. Uh, Jay Gruden gets hired else where,

0:13:32.880 --> 0:13:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Mike Zimmer gets hired else I mean, that's a big

0:13:34.760 --> 0:13:37.240
<v Speaker 1>part of your job as executive. They've done very well drafted.

0:13:37.400 --> 0:13:39.560
<v Speaker 1>I think he probably gets some of the credit for that.

0:13:39.800 --> 0:13:42.199
<v Speaker 1>They're winning with Andy Dalton, which is tough. Now we're

0:13:42.200 --> 0:13:44.760
<v Speaker 1>starting to like the resigning. This is looking I don't

0:13:44.760 --> 0:13:46.360
<v Speaker 1>mind it. I agree. I think that one of his

0:13:46.400 --> 0:13:48.880
<v Speaker 1>most valuable traits is that he brings in great assistance.

0:13:48.920 --> 0:13:50.640
<v Speaker 1>So you worry about how great of a coach he

0:13:50.760 --> 0:13:53.160
<v Speaker 1>is or whether it's the assistance doing the work. But

0:13:53.320 --> 0:13:55.679
<v Speaker 1>he does deserve credit for some of the personnel moves,

0:13:55.960 --> 0:13:58.760
<v Speaker 1>for how good the roster has been lately. I just

0:13:58.800 --> 0:14:02.360
<v Speaker 1>don't know that is actual coaching and game management. To me,

0:14:02.400 --> 0:14:04.800
<v Speaker 1>it's among the worst in the NFL in big spots.

0:14:05.160 --> 0:14:08.440
<v Speaker 1>He's terrible at challenges. He's terrible at making decisions during

0:14:08.440 --> 0:14:10.800
<v Speaker 1>the game. I agree with that, Uh, and he doesn't

0:14:10.800 --> 0:14:13.000
<v Speaker 1>have his team ready to play in in the in

0:14:13.080 --> 0:14:16.320
<v Speaker 1>big games. One of the guys that's UH usually ready

0:14:16.320 --> 0:14:20.440
<v Speaker 1>to play in big games. But his last play was discouraging.

0:14:20.520 --> 0:14:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Definitely not a good decision. Russell Wilson has been talked

0:14:24.640 --> 0:14:27.040
<v Speaker 1>in them news a lot because of his contract. He

0:14:27.080 --> 0:14:29.840
<v Speaker 1>was on NFL Network this week and he's really pushing

0:14:29.840 --> 0:14:31.960
<v Speaker 1>this baseball story and will be quick on this, but

0:14:32.160 --> 0:14:34.480
<v Speaker 1>it's really interesting. He talked with Dan Helly on Total

0:14:34.520 --> 0:14:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Access and he keeps insisting that his interest in baseball

0:14:38.640 --> 0:14:41.480
<v Speaker 1>is not a employ and that if anyone could pull

0:14:41.520 --> 0:14:44.520
<v Speaker 1>off baseball and football at the same time being a quarterback,

0:14:44.760 --> 0:14:47.720
<v Speaker 1>it would be him. What are you? What is this?

0:14:47.840 --> 0:14:51.000
<v Speaker 1>He needs a reality check? Well, let's let's compare him

0:14:51.040 --> 0:14:55.040
<v Speaker 1>to another two sport want to be athletes. Russell Wilson,

0:14:55.160 --> 0:15:00.400
<v Speaker 1>at twenty two years old, straight out of college, has

0:15:00.440 --> 0:15:03.800
<v Speaker 1>been playing baseball the whole time. No layoff, HiT's two

0:15:03.800 --> 0:15:09.360
<v Speaker 1>twenty nine with a walk walk strikeout ratio. Terrible numbers

0:15:10.080 --> 0:15:13.000
<v Speaker 1>in a ball which is supposed to be easy. Michael

0:15:13.080 --> 0:15:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Jordan fifteen years from playing baseball. HiT's two oh two

0:15:16.840 --> 0:15:20.520
<v Speaker 1>with the same exact walk strikeout ratio and double a ball,

0:15:20.800 --> 0:15:22.720
<v Speaker 1>which is a lot harder, and he hadn't played in

0:15:22.720 --> 0:15:25.160
<v Speaker 1>fifteen years. Russell Wilson needs a wake up call. I

0:15:25.160 --> 0:15:28.280
<v Speaker 1>think if you're if you're at his age, you're early twenties,

0:15:28.680 --> 0:15:31.720
<v Speaker 1>and you're hailed around the NFL, is having completely cut

0:15:31.760 --> 0:15:35.160
<v Speaker 1>against the grain of the prototypical NFL quarterback, largely because

0:15:35.200 --> 0:15:38.800
<v Speaker 1>of who you are, how hard you work, how respected

0:15:38.840 --> 0:15:40.760
<v Speaker 1>you are. You've been to two straight Super Bowls, you've

0:15:40.760 --> 0:15:44.240
<v Speaker 1>turned you've created hundreds and thousands of jobs in Seattle.

0:15:44.560 --> 0:15:47.680
<v Speaker 1>You probably believe you can do anything. He really sounds

0:15:47.720 --> 0:15:49.520
<v Speaker 1>like it. You can see that to be a great

0:15:49.560 --> 0:15:52.400
<v Speaker 1>athlete you have to have a certain uh bit of

0:15:52.760 --> 0:15:56.200
<v Speaker 1>irrational confidence exactly naive. I don't know if it's being naive.

0:15:56.240 --> 0:15:59.520
<v Speaker 1>It's just wild belief. It's like it's like TDS belief

0:15:59.520 --> 0:16:02.920
<v Speaker 1>in his own basketball game or whatever it is producing skills.

0:16:02.920 --> 0:16:07.640
<v Speaker 1>It's just wild over confidence. It's founded on the producing front.

0:16:07.680 --> 0:16:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Just you know, I felt like you need to be

0:16:10.000 --> 0:16:12.400
<v Speaker 1>what is up with all this baseball. It's a little ridiculous.

0:16:12.440 --> 0:16:14.560
<v Speaker 1>It is kind of strange. Baseball is the hardest sport

0:16:14.600 --> 0:16:16.680
<v Speaker 1>sport to play. You just can't wake up and be like, oh,

0:16:16.880 --> 0:16:18.760
<v Speaker 1>just because I played it in college for a little while.

0:16:18.760 --> 0:16:20.920
<v Speaker 1>There's a reason you have to master each level of

0:16:20.920 --> 0:16:23.120
<v Speaker 1>the min right before you get to I love it.

0:16:23.120 --> 0:16:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Whenever they asked the Rangers general manager about it, because

0:16:26.080 --> 0:16:28.480
<v Speaker 1>all of his quotes, if you translate them down to

0:16:28.520 --> 0:16:31.120
<v Speaker 1>their essence, are like, are you eff and kidding me?

0:16:31.720 --> 0:16:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Like it's just like, oh, Russell's really competitive. We we

0:16:34.920 --> 0:16:36.440
<v Speaker 1>like him a lot. We think he's got a good

0:16:36.440 --> 0:16:38.720
<v Speaker 1>thing going in football, Like he's like, are you kidding me?

0:16:38.760 --> 0:16:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Why would he equill? Maybe they're getting a cut of

0:16:40.720 --> 0:16:43.200
<v Speaker 1>his new contract. I think it's all brinksmanship, is what

0:16:43.240 --> 0:16:46.320
<v Speaker 1>this is, all right? That is that is the news

0:16:46.360 --> 0:16:50.120
<v Speaker 1>for today, on this beautiful hands, this thirty fifth birthday,

0:16:50.160 --> 0:16:52.040
<v Speaker 1>which gets me thinking, why why don't we call them?

0:16:52.080 --> 0:16:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Let's not save let's not save that mother show. Let's

0:16:54.800 --> 0:16:57.040
<v Speaker 1>just see Okay, let's see if they went the old

0:16:57.080 --> 0:16:59.680
<v Speaker 1>zeuser is up to on his birthday. Alright, TV, let's

0:16:59.680 --> 0:17:10.399
<v Speaker 1>get him on the horn. HI reached Dan. Sorry I

0:17:10.440 --> 0:17:12.040
<v Speaker 1>can't get to the phone right now, but leave a

0:17:12.080 --> 0:17:13.479
<v Speaker 1>message and I'll get back to you as soon as

0:17:13.480 --> 0:17:18.000
<v Speaker 1>I can at the telne Please record your message. When

0:17:18.000 --> 0:17:20.600
<v Speaker 1>you finished recording, you may hang up or press one

0:17:20.680 --> 0:17:25.720
<v Speaker 1>for more options. Hey, Dan, Mark Cesler here, your cohort

0:17:25.760 --> 0:17:28.119
<v Speaker 1>here at NFL Media. I just wanted to wish you

0:17:28.160 --> 0:17:30.679
<v Speaker 1>happy birthday. Also want a side note. Couldn't get you

0:17:30.720 --> 0:17:32.439
<v Speaker 1>on the phone here for the podcast. Could you just

0:17:32.480 --> 0:17:34.960
<v Speaker 1>call me back and give me your true thoughts on

0:17:35.080 --> 0:17:36.800
<v Speaker 1>a Chris Wesley And how do you feel that he

0:17:36.920 --> 0:17:39.440
<v Speaker 1>is as a colleague and be as a boss? Greg

0:17:39.520 --> 0:17:42.159
<v Speaker 1>Rosenthal rate him and through f Okay, what kind of

0:17:42.200 --> 0:17:44.920
<v Speaker 1>birthday message is that? I don't know, Happy birthday, Dan.

0:17:45.680 --> 0:17:47.720
<v Speaker 1>I thought we were gonna sing or something. All right,

0:17:47.760 --> 0:17:51.240
<v Speaker 1>we'll see you. Oh that's it. I guess that didn't

0:17:51.240 --> 0:17:53.800
<v Speaker 1>work out well. I want to get information. I was

0:17:53.840 --> 0:17:55.880
<v Speaker 1>expecting you to go off on some you know, made

0:17:55.960 --> 0:17:58.200
<v Speaker 1>up story or tangent of that. There was a fire

0:17:58.240 --> 0:18:00.440
<v Speaker 1>at NFL Media and he had to come David, and

0:18:01.119 --> 0:18:03.719
<v Speaker 1>I want information from him on the most honest day

0:18:03.760 --> 0:18:06.000
<v Speaker 1>of the day he was born. I'm sure he'll call

0:18:06.080 --> 0:18:10.000
<v Speaker 1>me back. Dan, celebrating today. Also, you know your lovely

0:18:10.080 --> 0:18:12.480
<v Speaker 1>wife Simone, it's her birthday as well. It is a

0:18:12.480 --> 0:18:14.600
<v Speaker 1>little eerie. They were born not only on the same

0:18:14.640 --> 0:18:17.240
<v Speaker 1>month and day, but the same year, within hours of

0:18:17.240 --> 0:18:20.960
<v Speaker 1>each other, not in the same place. Could they be related?

0:18:21.240 --> 0:18:23.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. That's the thing. There's it's a mystery

0:18:23.560 --> 0:18:25.679
<v Speaker 1>that has you know, other limbs. We don't know. Have

0:18:25.800 --> 0:18:29.720
<v Speaker 1>you ever thought that dating simone is really the closest

0:18:29.840 --> 0:18:33.280
<v Speaker 1>you could do to indirectly dating your friend Dan Kansas?

0:18:34.560 --> 0:18:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Now I haven't correct, but now I am thinking that,

0:18:37.119 --> 0:18:40.479
<v Speaker 1>and thank you we s that's how I primit. All right,

0:18:40.640 --> 0:18:44.280
<v Speaker 1>let's move on to our talk about the two thousand

0:18:44.320 --> 0:18:47.120
<v Speaker 1>fourteen crop in West I talked about it. You got

0:18:47.119 --> 0:18:50.120
<v Speaker 1>your piece up right now on the best wide receivers

0:18:50.200 --> 0:18:54.600
<v Speaker 1>from the class, and it's a fascinating piece. Everyone should

0:18:54.680 --> 0:18:57.040
<v Speaker 1>check it out, you know, take your time with it,

0:18:57.400 --> 0:18:59.600
<v Speaker 1>nice and long, you know, print it out maybe if

0:18:59.640 --> 0:19:02.800
<v Speaker 1>you ller into paper and whatnot, and you make the

0:19:02.840 --> 0:19:05.720
<v Speaker 1>case that you think there could be ten number one

0:19:05.800 --> 0:19:09.920
<v Speaker 1>receivers in this one class. Well, I think there are

0:19:09.960 --> 0:19:13.679
<v Speaker 1>that many guys with potential. You Odell Beckham, Mike Evans,

0:19:13.760 --> 0:19:17.199
<v Speaker 1>Kelvin Benjamin already are Sammy Watkins I think he is.

0:19:17.600 --> 0:19:20.200
<v Speaker 1>So there's four right off the bat. John Brown who's

0:19:20.200 --> 0:19:22.840
<v Speaker 1>been compared to Marvin Harrison blew me away. When I

0:19:22.840 --> 0:19:24.800
<v Speaker 1>watched his film, he he might have been the guy

0:19:24.840 --> 0:19:27.480
<v Speaker 1>that I was more impressed than I expected to be.

0:19:28.240 --> 0:19:31.760
<v Speaker 1>You've got guys like these raw guys with number one

0:19:31.920 --> 0:19:34.840
<v Speaker 1>receiver talent, but they still need to work on the

0:19:34.960 --> 0:19:39.480
<v Speaker 1>route running and reading defenses, like Martavis Bryant, Cody Lattimer,

0:19:40.000 --> 0:19:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Dante Moncrief, You've got Jordan Matthews. So you think Dante

0:19:43.600 --> 0:19:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Moncrief could be a potential number one receiver with Andrew Luck,

0:19:46.640 --> 0:19:50.680
<v Speaker 1>I do, and and I believe I believe you called

0:19:50.760 --> 0:19:52.359
<v Speaker 1>him that at one point last year that when you

0:19:52.359 --> 0:19:54.560
<v Speaker 1>watched him, you saw a number one receiver. He is

0:19:54.600 --> 0:19:57.000
<v Speaker 1>physically really talented. I was surprised to hear you say that.

0:19:57.040 --> 0:19:59.399
<v Speaker 1>And Jordan Matthews too, So you think he could be

0:19:59.480 --> 0:20:02.840
<v Speaker 1>more than us the slot game. He played the slot

0:20:02.920 --> 0:20:05.680
<v Speaker 1>more than any receiver in the NFL last year percentage wise.

0:20:06.160 --> 0:20:07.800
<v Speaker 1>But it seems like from their off season moves that

0:20:07.840 --> 0:20:10.320
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna move him outside this year, and if he's

0:20:10.320 --> 0:20:13.480
<v Speaker 1>in that number one role for the Eagles, his production

0:20:13.520 --> 0:20:15.040
<v Speaker 1>is going to go through the roof. Just look what

0:20:15.320 --> 0:20:18.119
<v Speaker 1>de Sean Jackson and Jeremy Macklin have done. So I

0:20:18.160 --> 0:20:21.240
<v Speaker 1>think that's that's about ten guys right there. Brandon Cooks,

0:20:21.240 --> 0:20:23.960
<v Speaker 1>who knows what he's going to be. Has anyone I mean,

0:20:24.080 --> 0:20:27.440
<v Speaker 1>obviously the potential for this classes, but maybe the best

0:20:27.560 --> 0:20:30.800
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver group ever because also the position is just

0:20:30.840 --> 0:20:32.960
<v Speaker 1>so much more refined than it used to be as well,

0:20:33.480 --> 0:20:37.000
<v Speaker 1>anyone on this list disappointed you with what they where

0:20:37.000 --> 0:20:39.960
<v Speaker 1>they were drafting, and where they are. You know what,

0:20:40.080 --> 0:20:42.480
<v Speaker 1>there really wasn't a lot of disappointment. I would say

0:20:42.520 --> 0:20:45.320
<v Speaker 1>that Mark Heasley, you need to watch all of his

0:20:45.400 --> 0:20:47.399
<v Speaker 1>games because the first half of the season was just

0:20:47.480 --> 0:20:51.280
<v Speaker 1>a massive failure. He dropped passes, didn't know his assignments,

0:20:51.560 --> 0:20:54.639
<v Speaker 1>didn't make plays, and then right around week thirteen he

0:20:54.720 --> 0:20:57.840
<v Speaker 1>starts to show that explosive run after catchability that he

0:20:57.920 --> 0:21:00.280
<v Speaker 1>was billed to have when he was seen as his

0:21:00.320 --> 0:21:02.880
<v Speaker 1>sophomore year in college the number one receiver in the country.

0:21:03.240 --> 0:21:04.600
<v Speaker 1>So he's a guy that you kind of have to

0:21:04.600 --> 0:21:06.520
<v Speaker 1>watch all of his film and you can see his

0:21:06.520 --> 0:21:09.560
<v Speaker 1>his upside a little bit there. Jarvis Landry, I think

0:21:09.600 --> 0:21:11.720
<v Speaker 1>with him, like I was really impressed during the season

0:21:11.720 --> 0:21:14.840
<v Speaker 1>with his run after catchability, but again limited to the slot.

0:21:14.920 --> 0:21:17.520
<v Speaker 1>He's never gonna be anything but a slot receiver. And

0:21:17.600 --> 0:21:20.880
<v Speaker 1>so many of his passes were manufactured by the play caller,

0:21:21.000 --> 0:21:24.320
<v Speaker 1>not the quarterback. It was quick tosses within four or

0:21:24.320 --> 0:21:26.399
<v Speaker 1>five yards of the line of scrimmage, a lot of

0:21:26.480 --> 0:21:30.240
<v Speaker 1>emotion behind the quarterback, a lot of creativity there. And

0:21:30.280 --> 0:21:31.679
<v Speaker 1>I don't I don't know how much of that is

0:21:31.760 --> 0:21:34.399
<v Speaker 1>his his natural ability and how much is that just

0:21:34.440 --> 0:21:37.480
<v Speaker 1>the play caller making him. Well, call him a destitute

0:21:37.480 --> 0:21:40.720
<v Speaker 1>man's high reward. Well, he does have that physicality to him,

0:21:40.760 --> 0:21:43.320
<v Speaker 1>and he's I'm amazed he's on the slow side. I'm

0:21:43.320 --> 0:21:46.200
<v Speaker 1>amazed you ranked him below Marquis Lee and Allen Robinson.

0:21:46.440 --> 0:21:49.960
<v Speaker 1>I like Allen Robinson. Ellen Robinson's a playmaker. I think

0:21:50.040 --> 0:21:52.159
<v Speaker 1>he's a little on the slow, slow side for a

0:21:52.160 --> 0:21:55.520
<v Speaker 1>deep threat, but if you watch his kind of catch

0:21:55.600 --> 0:21:58.280
<v Speaker 1>radius and his ability to high point his body control,

0:21:58.320 --> 0:22:01.600
<v Speaker 1>it's more impressive than Sammy Watkins. Bortos has a chance

0:22:01.600 --> 0:22:03.960
<v Speaker 1>in this offense to get a lot better in this

0:22:04.080 --> 0:22:07.399
<v Speaker 1>second year with Robinson, Lee and Alan Hearns, who has

0:22:07.400 --> 0:22:10.080
<v Speaker 1>sneaked on the end of the list. Unfortunately, you compared

0:22:10.160 --> 0:22:13.200
<v Speaker 1>him to Kevin Ogletree. It's not really think the most

0:22:13.680 --> 0:22:16.959
<v Speaker 1>you know, flattering comparable. It was hard to come up

0:22:16.960 --> 0:22:19.840
<v Speaker 1>with an Alan Hearns comparison. He's on the thin side. Uh,

0:22:19.920 --> 0:22:22.840
<v Speaker 1>he's not physical, he's not a great athlete, he doesn't

0:22:22.880 --> 0:22:27.400
<v Speaker 1>jump well, how do you NFL receivers normally do all

0:22:27.400 --> 0:22:30.280
<v Speaker 1>those things? So, and he also had there was a

0:22:30.280 --> 0:22:32.480
<v Speaker 1>flukey nature to his big plays where it was a

0:22:32.520 --> 0:22:34.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of blown coverage and a lot of mistackles. And

0:22:35.000 --> 0:22:37.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if it's repeatable. It's crazy how deep

0:22:37.880 --> 0:22:39.639
<v Speaker 1>this classes. Because at the end of your article, and

0:22:39.640 --> 0:22:41.479
<v Speaker 1>people should read it right to the last line, you

0:22:41.560 --> 0:22:46.200
<v Speaker 1>even give nuggets about guys like Bruce Ellington, Taylor Gabriel,

0:22:46.240 --> 0:22:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Paul Richardson, and even they have potential. I mean Taylor

0:22:49.320 --> 0:22:53.399
<v Speaker 1>Gabriel for Clearland terrible last last season, Gabriel was second

0:22:53.440 --> 0:22:56.520
<v Speaker 1>on the Browns and receiving yards. And you know Josh

0:22:56.600 --> 0:22:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Huff who there are some people in the Eagles organization

0:22:59.640 --> 0:23:02.199
<v Speaker 1>think he has a higher upside than Jordan Matthews. So

0:23:02.240 --> 0:23:04.040
<v Speaker 1>you're right a lot of I mean, we can go

0:23:04.119 --> 0:23:08.120
<v Speaker 1>twenty five deep in names, but it's hard. It's hard

0:23:08.119 --> 0:23:11.560
<v Speaker 1>to evaluate guys like Michael Campanaro, who only you know,

0:23:11.600 --> 0:23:13.639
<v Speaker 1>played a hundred snaps for the Raven. Now let's talk

0:23:13.640 --> 0:23:15.280
<v Speaker 1>about the guys closer to top. I mean, you had

0:23:15.320 --> 0:23:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Odell Beckham all by himself the number one, number one.

0:23:18.840 --> 0:23:21.320
<v Speaker 1>I think it's it's silly to have anyone else as

0:23:21.320 --> 0:23:23.040
<v Speaker 1>a number one overall pick in that draft. If you

0:23:23.080 --> 0:23:25.440
<v Speaker 1>if you're redrafting, and your comparison for him, I liked

0:23:25.440 --> 0:23:29.439
<v Speaker 1>a lot a souped up Steve Smith slash Antonio Brown

0:23:29.560 --> 0:23:32.840
<v Speaker 1>hybrid with flashes of Michael Jordan's. I mean, that's it.

0:23:32.920 --> 0:23:35.560
<v Speaker 1>We we've kind of been through your love of Odell Beckham.

0:23:35.600 --> 0:23:38.640
<v Speaker 1>I found it interesting you ranked Mike Evans over Sammy

0:23:38.680 --> 0:23:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Watkins and you didn't put numbers next to I say,

0:23:40.840 --> 0:23:42.639
<v Speaker 1>I see what you do, trying to put him in tears,

0:23:42.880 --> 0:23:45.600
<v Speaker 1>and you put it in the tears obviously of great players,

0:23:45.640 --> 0:23:49.080
<v Speaker 1>future Pro bowlers. But ultimately you put Evans his name first,

0:23:49.080 --> 0:23:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Watkins next, and Kelvin Benjamin third of that group. How

0:23:53.600 --> 0:23:56.439
<v Speaker 1>do that's a KG move. I'm a savvy veteran. I

0:23:56.480 --> 0:23:58.280
<v Speaker 1>know that if I put numbers, that that's all I'm

0:23:58.280 --> 0:24:00.399
<v Speaker 1>gonna hear about on Twitter. Fine, but is about the

0:24:00.480 --> 0:24:02.119
<v Speaker 1>numbers and not the analysy I have about be a

0:24:02.119 --> 0:24:05.040
<v Speaker 1>man and take a stand. Ultimately, you have the name

0:24:05.200 --> 0:24:07.160
<v Speaker 1>on top there, Mike Evans. Why do you like him

0:24:07.160 --> 0:24:10.320
<v Speaker 1>better than the other two? Well, Evans and Watkins were

0:24:10.359 --> 0:24:12.639
<v Speaker 1>extremely close, and I went back and forth. I copied

0:24:12.640 --> 0:24:15.000
<v Speaker 1>and pasted one over the other about ten different times.

0:24:15.640 --> 0:24:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Mike Evans makes place at the catch point, he makes

0:24:17.920 --> 0:24:21.640
<v Speaker 1>contested catches and Sammy, Sammy Watkins really didn't. And that's

0:24:22.080 --> 0:24:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Sammy Watsins is a lot, He's a lot more explosive,

0:24:24.680 --> 0:24:27.560
<v Speaker 1>but he didn't help out his quarterbacks, and his quarterbacks

0:24:27.560 --> 0:24:30.560
<v Speaker 1>didn't help out him. Mike Evans definitely helped out his quarterbacks.

0:24:30.960 --> 0:24:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Walk into the moments. He was playing with such a

0:24:32.800 --> 0:24:36.160
<v Speaker 1>bum Josh McCown. Josh McCown got the ball to Mike Evans.

0:24:36.240 --> 0:24:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Orton could not get the ball to Sammy Watkins.

0:24:38.520 --> 0:24:41.240
<v Speaker 1>His ball placement was horrendous. It surprised me how bad

0:24:41.359 --> 0:24:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Orton was. Watkins also was playing injured all year. He's

0:24:44.440 --> 0:24:47.040
<v Speaker 1>hard to evaluate because of the poor quarterback play and

0:24:47.080 --> 0:24:51.240
<v Speaker 1>he played through groin, rib and hip injury, so he's

0:24:51.280 --> 0:24:53.760
<v Speaker 1>really hard to evaluate. It wouldn't surprise me at all

0:24:53.800 --> 0:24:55.399
<v Speaker 1>if he has a better career than Mike Evans. I

0:24:55.400 --> 0:24:58.360
<v Speaker 1>mean how much when you're watching one year of tape.

0:24:59.160 --> 0:25:01.240
<v Speaker 1>I did tight ends, and I had to factor in

0:25:01.280 --> 0:25:03.920
<v Speaker 1>the quarterback play as well, because with some of these

0:25:04.000 --> 0:25:07.119
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks that like Sammy Watkins, you are dealing with a

0:25:07.200 --> 0:25:10.359
<v Speaker 1>total issue there. And frankly, honestly the same with Mike Evans.

0:25:10.359 --> 0:25:12.800
<v Speaker 1>What Evans did with going back and forth between two

0:25:12.880 --> 0:25:16.320
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks last season, he was spectacular down the stretch. Well,

0:25:16.320 --> 0:25:19.480
<v Speaker 1>I would say that another factor that's very important and

0:25:19.920 --> 0:25:22.120
<v Speaker 1>why I had Watkins over Evans a couple of times

0:25:22.160 --> 0:25:24.680
<v Speaker 1>before I changed it. Watkins was doing this against number

0:25:24.680 --> 0:25:27.520
<v Speaker 1>one corners and doubles tang big. Evans was joined it

0:25:27.560 --> 0:25:31.320
<v Speaker 1>against mismatches in number two corners when they play the Browns,

0:25:31.359 --> 0:25:33.719
<v Speaker 1>Evans is getting buster screen, not Joe Hayden. And some

0:25:33.760 --> 0:25:36.400
<v Speaker 1>of those Evans plays were a little flukey too. Yeah,

0:25:36.640 --> 0:25:38.920
<v Speaker 1>some times it was bad and he got away with

0:25:38.960 --> 0:25:41.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of push offs. But he's a more dynamic athlete.

0:25:41.640 --> 0:25:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Thing you think Calvin Benjamin I ranked below those two

0:25:45.440 --> 0:25:49.520
<v Speaker 1>guys because one way too many drops. I mean, he's

0:25:49.520 --> 0:25:51.920
<v Speaker 1>one of those guys that he makes the hard plays

0:25:51.960 --> 0:25:54.680
<v Speaker 1>look easy and the easy plays look hard. He's also

0:25:54.720 --> 0:25:57.200
<v Speaker 1>one of those guys. Even when he's not open, he's

0:25:57.200 --> 0:25:59.800
<v Speaker 1>open four feet over his head. And that's perfect for

0:26:00.000 --> 0:26:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Am Newton because when he's wild, he's wild high. He's

0:26:03.280 --> 0:26:06.439
<v Speaker 1>the perfect receiver for Cam Newton. Um and and again

0:26:06.600 --> 0:26:12.320
<v Speaker 1>did it against number one corners. Did it again, Desmond Truyfont,

0:26:12.560 --> 0:26:15.360
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Smith. They trailed him around the field. I I

0:26:15.400 --> 0:26:18.200
<v Speaker 1>love Kelvin Benjamin. I don't know if I would rank

0:26:18.280 --> 0:26:21.400
<v Speaker 1>him second on this list, but just my personal which

0:26:21.400 --> 0:26:24.280
<v Speaker 1>one I like. I like Kevin Benjamin. I think he

0:26:24.320 --> 0:26:26.720
<v Speaker 1>has a chance to be better than those two guys.

0:26:26.760 --> 0:26:29.480
<v Speaker 1>There's another factor. Kevin Benjamin is almost three years older

0:26:29.520 --> 0:26:33.119
<v Speaker 1>than Mike Evans. That that is significantly. He's such a weird,

0:26:33.480 --> 0:26:36.439
<v Speaker 1>interesting receiver because he's a deep threat that's not really

0:26:36.480 --> 0:26:40.160
<v Speaker 1>that fast, which is interesting, and he's just a he's

0:26:40.200 --> 0:26:42.359
<v Speaker 1>just a big guy. You're speed when he's tracking the

0:26:42.359 --> 0:26:44.640
<v Speaker 1>ball though, which is important for for a big guy

0:26:44.720 --> 0:26:47.320
<v Speaker 1>like that, he can be covered. And he's a natural

0:26:47.440 --> 0:26:50.760
<v Speaker 1>receiver though. I mean he is a really natural receiver.

0:26:50.840 --> 0:26:53.000
<v Speaker 1>I think more than Evans. You called Evans a stretch

0:26:53.040 --> 0:26:55.639
<v Speaker 1>forward and cleats it. I can see the upside for Evans,

0:26:55.640 --> 0:26:58.560
<v Speaker 1>but there's something about Benjamin that drops her a problem.

0:26:58.760 --> 0:27:02.520
<v Speaker 1>But it seemed like he maybe isn't all there um

0:27:02.640 --> 0:27:05.280
<v Speaker 1>mentally right now. Is that fair? He has a lot

0:27:05.320 --> 0:27:07.639
<v Speaker 1>to pick up at the NFL level, But that can happen.

0:27:07.760 --> 0:27:09.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think I'm a guy like t O

0:27:09.359 --> 0:27:11.440
<v Speaker 1>when he was entering the league and stuff. I could

0:27:11.440 --> 0:27:13.639
<v Speaker 1>see that guy once he starts figuring things out, that

0:27:13.720 --> 0:27:16.239
<v Speaker 1>he could be. There's another difference to that. Evans has

0:27:16.240 --> 0:27:19.160
<v Speaker 1>an advantage, I think a major advantage and run after catchability.

0:27:19.480 --> 0:27:22.840
<v Speaker 1>They both can high point, they both can win contested catches.

0:27:23.520 --> 0:27:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Benjamin is probably a little bit more physical just because

0:27:26.080 --> 0:27:29.680
<v Speaker 1>he's got that wide body, but Evans is a Evans

0:27:29.680 --> 0:27:31.480
<v Speaker 1>can be a beast after the catch at times, and

0:27:31.520 --> 0:27:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Benjamin really needs space to operate. It's crazy to think

0:27:34.880 --> 0:27:37.480
<v Speaker 1>that the way this goes, they should all be better

0:27:38.040 --> 0:27:40.520
<v Speaker 1>this season. Now, injuries will play apart. But then I

0:27:40.520 --> 0:27:42.080
<v Speaker 1>look at a guy like John Brown because of all

0:27:42.160 --> 0:27:46.840
<v Speaker 1>what happened with the quarterback chaos during that season. Mr. Yeah,

0:27:46.880 --> 0:27:48.880
<v Speaker 1>and I and that's one guy that we spent all

0:27:49.000 --> 0:27:52.320
<v Speaker 1>last summer where Steve Kim and the Cardinals were just

0:27:52.760 --> 0:27:54.919
<v Speaker 1>showering praise and I thought, you know, we're gonna get

0:27:54.960 --> 0:27:57.440
<v Speaker 1>fried for these articles, writing one after the other saying

0:27:57.440 --> 0:28:00.240
<v Speaker 1>how he can be touched in practice. But he paid off.

0:28:00.280 --> 0:28:02.639
<v Speaker 1>I thought in games right away he was a difference maker.

0:28:03.119 --> 0:28:05.720
<v Speaker 1>He was. I was so impressed with him watching and

0:28:06.359 --> 0:28:08.320
<v Speaker 1>I wrote a lot of flowery articles, as did you.

0:28:08.400 --> 0:28:10.240
<v Speaker 1>But I also wrote a lot of flowery articles about

0:28:10.240 --> 0:28:13.639
<v Speaker 1>Brandon Cooks, and after watching both of their all of

0:28:13.680 --> 0:28:15.800
<v Speaker 1>their targets, I was way more impressed with John Brown

0:28:15.840 --> 0:28:18.000
<v Speaker 1>than Brandon cook So you draft Brown? Where would you

0:28:18.119 --> 0:28:22.439
<v Speaker 1>draft Brown? Let's say, in a random, just nebulous draft

0:28:22.520 --> 0:28:26.439
<v Speaker 1>like early twenties. Okay, that's pretty good. That's pretty good

0:28:26.480 --> 0:28:28.159
<v Speaker 1>for a guy you got in the fifth third. And

0:28:28.200 --> 0:28:29.919
<v Speaker 1>I think the Cardinals would too if they had to

0:28:29.920 --> 0:28:33.440
<v Speaker 1>do it again. He's a guy where the difference between

0:28:33.480 --> 0:28:35.840
<v Speaker 1>him and Cooks was right away. And this is part

0:28:35.840 --> 0:28:38.080
<v Speaker 1>of why Bruce arians is such a great coach. Has

0:28:38.160 --> 0:28:41.640
<v Speaker 1>him lining up all over the formation. He's doing the usual,

0:28:42.400 --> 0:28:44.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, the jitterbug routes where you give him slants

0:28:44.800 --> 0:28:47.840
<v Speaker 1>and crossers and end a rounds and real quick swing passes.

0:28:48.000 --> 0:28:50.200
<v Speaker 1>He's doing all that stuff, but he's also running sideline

0:28:50.280 --> 0:28:53.400
<v Speaker 1>routes and he's burning guys deep. Sigmund Bloom had a

0:28:53.440 --> 0:28:55.160
<v Speaker 1>great line. He goes and gets that deep ball like

0:28:55.200 --> 0:28:58.000
<v Speaker 1>a frisbee catching dog. You throw that, You throw that

0:28:58.040 --> 0:28:59.640
<v Speaker 1>deep ball and he'll run and go get it. I

0:28:59.680 --> 0:29:01.920
<v Speaker 1>mean he just go under it and he'll burn the

0:29:01.920 --> 0:29:03.800
<v Speaker 1>guy and get it. He goes then go to the

0:29:03.800 --> 0:29:06.760
<v Speaker 1>playoffs because of that. Ultimately, that was like one of

0:29:06.760 --> 0:29:08.560
<v Speaker 1>the best players of the season that he made against

0:29:08.640 --> 0:29:10.520
<v Speaker 1>and he did that what three or four times in

0:29:10.560 --> 0:29:12.440
<v Speaker 1>the first month of the season. You know, it's funny,

0:29:12.480 --> 0:29:14.880
<v Speaker 1>like we so we talked to Larry Fitzgerald yesterday on

0:29:14.920 --> 0:29:17.719
<v Speaker 1>the phone and he like, oh, that's that we I mean,

0:29:18.480 --> 0:29:21.360
<v Speaker 1>did I didn't get on a group phone. TD wasn't there.

0:29:21.360 --> 0:29:24.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, that's you. You're the maybe listening. But we

0:29:24.080 --> 0:29:26.960
<v Speaker 1>talked that's about John Brown, you're the journal and he

0:29:27.000 --> 0:29:28.920
<v Speaker 1>basically said that John Brown, the thing that was most

0:29:28.960 --> 0:29:31.560
<v Speaker 1>impressive was what you just said, how he picked it

0:29:31.640 --> 0:29:33.440
<v Speaker 1>up the offense and played all over the field. And

0:29:33.440 --> 0:29:36.160
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking, wait, that's the knock on Larry Fitzgerald

0:29:36.280 --> 0:29:38.680
<v Speaker 1>last season that he had trouble doing that himself out

0:29:38.680 --> 0:29:41.680
<v Speaker 1>of the gate in that offense. Yeah, it's impressive. That.

0:29:42.520 --> 0:29:45.160
<v Speaker 1>And you heard Steve kim their GM say that his

0:29:45.160 --> 0:29:48.600
<v Speaker 1>his knowledge of the route concepts, coming from tiny Pittsburgh State,

0:29:48.840 --> 0:29:50.880
<v Speaker 1>just blew them out of the water in the first

0:29:50.920 --> 0:29:53.239
<v Speaker 1>mining camp that he already knew exactly where to go.

0:29:53.640 --> 0:29:58.520
<v Speaker 1>He's a really bright guy and interestingly enough nicknamed Smokey. Why,

0:29:59.760 --> 0:30:04.080
<v Speaker 1>by the of people should probably google it. Okay, all right, nothing,

0:30:03.120 --> 0:30:07.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't because he smokes defensive backs. I love or

0:30:07.800 --> 0:30:12.080
<v Speaker 1>illegal elements. I love the comparisons more than anything. Mike

0:30:12.120 --> 0:30:15.400
<v Speaker 1>Evans was Harold Carmichael Light. You know, yeah, d J

0:30:15.480 --> 0:30:18.160
<v Speaker 1>will probably just throwing in the one name comparison to

0:30:18.240 --> 0:30:20.760
<v Speaker 1>some current player. You're going all over and you're just

0:30:20.960 --> 0:30:23.960
<v Speaker 1>you're describing it. Mike Evans is Pierre Garson or Sammy

0:30:23.960 --> 0:30:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Watkins is Pierre Garson turned superhero totally. You know, I

0:30:28.120 --> 0:30:29.960
<v Speaker 1>know what you mean when you say that. You say,

0:30:30.000 --> 0:30:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Kelvin Benjamin is the evolutionary Plexico Burris. I wanted Plexico

0:30:35.160 --> 0:30:37.959
<v Speaker 1>burros after Thanksgiving dinner, but I thought that was not

0:30:38.040 --> 0:30:41.600
<v Speaker 1>kind enough to Kelvin ben Jordan Matthews as mini Marcus Colston. Anyways,

0:30:41.600 --> 0:30:43.920
<v Speaker 1>lots of great stuff. We we will skip the whole

0:30:43.960 --> 0:30:46.680
<v Speaker 1>section of high upside projects with first round talent. I

0:30:46.720 --> 0:30:49.000
<v Speaker 1>love Martavis Bryant, so do you you compared him to

0:30:49.080 --> 0:30:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Chris Henry, which I thought was really interesting. Davante Adams

0:30:52.040 --> 0:30:54.240
<v Speaker 1>has a lot of potential. Cody Latimer was a little

0:30:54.280 --> 0:30:56.800
<v Speaker 1>higher than I expected to be on this list. Adams

0:30:56.840 --> 0:30:59.320
<v Speaker 1>was a guy that adversed how much I liked him.

0:30:59.360 --> 0:31:03.040
<v Speaker 1>He's not a who explodes off the film. He's not fast.

0:31:03.600 --> 0:31:05.440
<v Speaker 1>He's a really good route runner. He's got a great

0:31:05.520 --> 0:31:08.680
<v Speaker 1>double move. You could you could see the difference between

0:31:08.720 --> 0:31:10.520
<v Speaker 1>him and a guy like Alan Robinson where they both

0:31:10.560 --> 0:31:14.000
<v Speaker 1>are using double moves. Robinson's doesn't get him open, but

0:31:14.080 --> 0:31:19.240
<v Speaker 1>Adams does. And I think he's gonna be the McCarthy's

0:31:19.240 --> 0:31:21.240
<v Speaker 1>talking up their offense like it's gonna be really dynamic,

0:31:21.280 --> 0:31:22.760
<v Speaker 1>and I think Adams is one of the reasons why

0:31:22.800 --> 0:31:25.400
<v Speaker 1>that he's gonna be facing third cornerbacks. I like him.

0:31:25.400 --> 0:31:27.479
<v Speaker 1>That's a tough offense to pick up as a rookie.

0:31:27.560 --> 0:31:30.400
<v Speaker 1>He he's slipped in under the radar, finished the season,

0:31:30.440 --> 0:31:32.960
<v Speaker 1>had a couple of games. He really had two big

0:31:33.000 --> 0:31:35.240
<v Speaker 1>games in the season that they wouldn't have won the

0:31:35.280 --> 0:31:37.560
<v Speaker 1>game without Davante Adams. For a rookie to just come

0:31:37.560 --> 0:31:41.080
<v Speaker 1>in and do that is impressive. In that system, They're scary.

0:31:41.560 --> 0:31:43.880
<v Speaker 1>Everyone should read this site. Let's move on, uh to

0:31:44.000 --> 0:31:46.480
<v Speaker 1>one of the other positions. Let's go over to quarterback

0:31:46.520 --> 0:31:50.000
<v Speaker 1>here and uh my piece which will be posting on

0:31:50.240 --> 0:31:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Friday on the site, so it might not be quite

0:31:52.800 --> 0:31:56.080
<v Speaker 1>up when you listen to this ranks the quarterbacks of

0:31:56.120 --> 0:31:59.040
<v Speaker 1>the two thousand and fourteen class. And you know, I

0:31:59.080 --> 0:32:04.440
<v Speaker 1>start by saying, ultimately, the draft process did Teddy Bridgewater dirty.

0:32:04.480 --> 0:32:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Between the pro day and some private workouts and some

0:32:07.400 --> 0:32:10.680
<v Speaker 1>whispers he wasn't truly a leader. Skinny knees, right, he

0:32:10.880 --> 0:32:13.920
<v Speaker 1>somehow got knocked down to the end of the And

0:32:13.960 --> 0:32:15.920
<v Speaker 1>I think they got the best quarterback in this draft,

0:32:16.040 --> 0:32:17.600
<v Speaker 1>or at least the guy that I think is the

0:32:17.640 --> 0:32:20.000
<v Speaker 1>safest and I know for sure is going to be there.

0:32:20.280 --> 0:32:22.760
<v Speaker 1>And then after him, I think there's a group of

0:32:22.760 --> 0:32:25.000
<v Speaker 1>four guys who all I think they all have a chance,

0:32:25.320 --> 0:32:27.080
<v Speaker 1>but I don't really know. And I ranked him Blake

0:32:27.120 --> 0:32:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Boardles number two, Zach Mettenberger all the way up to

0:32:30.440 --> 0:32:33.200
<v Speaker 1>number three. I have him ahead of Derek Carr, and

0:32:33.200 --> 0:32:35.440
<v Speaker 1>I threw Jimmy Garoppolo in that group because even though

0:32:35.440 --> 0:32:37.520
<v Speaker 1>we didn't see a lot out of him. I liked

0:32:37.520 --> 0:32:39.120
<v Speaker 1>what I saw, and I think he has a chance

0:32:39.520 --> 0:32:42.960
<v Speaker 1>moving forward. West has taken me to task for this

0:32:43.040 --> 0:32:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Mettenberger at three, So why why don't we start there? Well,

0:32:46.000 --> 0:32:48.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that it's fun for me that you're gonna

0:32:48.120 --> 0:32:51.800
<v Speaker 1>have Raiders fans, you know, haranguing you. Yeah, I won't

0:32:51.800 --> 0:32:53.640
<v Speaker 1>have to deal with him because I would not have

0:32:53.720 --> 0:32:56.400
<v Speaker 1>ranked Mettenberger over Derek Carr. I mean, I think Derek

0:32:56.440 --> 0:33:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Carr people are going wildly overboard about a mediocre rook season,

0:33:00.560 --> 0:33:04.160
<v Speaker 1>but very mediocre, very media you know, the yards per attempts,

0:33:04.160 --> 0:33:06.760
<v Speaker 1>of the touchdown, the interception ratio, and the fact that

0:33:06.800 --> 0:33:10.240
<v Speaker 1>he just he wasn't David Carr, so that was good.

0:33:10.320 --> 0:33:12.960
<v Speaker 1>And he wasn't JaMarcus Russell and that was even better.

0:33:13.120 --> 0:33:15.000
<v Speaker 1>And so I think everyone just wanted to give him

0:33:15.000 --> 0:33:16.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of credit, but he was the guy. I

0:33:16.880 --> 0:33:20.640
<v Speaker 1>watched more games than anyone. Uh, I'm counting them up here, sick.

0:33:20.920 --> 0:33:23.000
<v Speaker 1>I think I watched eleven games of his because I

0:33:23.080 --> 0:33:25.400
<v Speaker 1>kept wanting to see more. What am I missing with

0:33:25.480 --> 0:33:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Derek Kark? I didn't see anything special. I saw a

0:33:28.040 --> 0:33:31.640
<v Speaker 1>lot more special out of Zach Mettenberger and Blake Borders.

0:33:31.680 --> 0:33:33.800
<v Speaker 1>I saw some tools there with Derek Carr. He's a

0:33:33.840 --> 0:33:37.240
<v Speaker 1>fast guy. Well, I think that's why scouts like him

0:33:37.240 --> 0:33:38.760
<v Speaker 1>because of the tools. But I didn't see it in

0:33:38.760 --> 0:33:41.160
<v Speaker 1>the games. Yeah, I agree, I didn't see it in

0:33:41.200 --> 0:33:44.200
<v Speaker 1>the games. I saw him doesn't go downfield, he he

0:33:44.200 --> 0:33:46.520
<v Speaker 1>could move in the pocket a little bit. When he

0:33:46.560 --> 0:33:49.120
<v Speaker 1>does go downfield, he was all over the place. I mean,

0:33:49.160 --> 0:33:51.000
<v Speaker 1>guys were open and he missed him and it's just

0:33:51.120 --> 0:33:53.640
<v Speaker 1>dink and dunk. They did not look like a professional offense.

0:33:53.680 --> 0:33:55.520
<v Speaker 1>They couldn't. Well is that a little part of it? Though?

0:33:55.520 --> 0:33:58.239
<v Speaker 1>If you're the Raiders that what they had going on

0:33:58.280 --> 0:34:01.440
<v Speaker 1>with your plague call or last year in the games

0:34:01.440 --> 0:34:03.880
<v Speaker 1>are among the lowest in the NFL. So it's okay.

0:34:04.760 --> 0:34:07.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm not one of these guys that wants to shower

0:34:07.480 --> 0:34:09.880
<v Speaker 1>praise on on on Car, although I think I like

0:34:09.960 --> 0:34:11.680
<v Speaker 1>him more than you do. But part of it is

0:34:11.760 --> 0:34:13.920
<v Speaker 1>just I want to see more patients in general with

0:34:14.000 --> 0:34:16.120
<v Speaker 1>some of these quarterbacks before we flame a guy that's

0:34:16.120 --> 0:34:18.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty one years old or something. I think they all

0:34:18.680 --> 0:34:20.880
<v Speaker 1>I think this group and Grapple is kind of a

0:34:20.880 --> 0:34:22.719
<v Speaker 1>weird guy to throw in there, but I think they

0:34:22.719 --> 0:34:25.440
<v Speaker 1>all have a chance to be long term starters. So

0:34:25.480 --> 0:34:28.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm not burying Derek Carr. I just didn't see it yet.

0:34:28.840 --> 0:34:31.120
<v Speaker 1>I think there's been a lot worse rookie seasons than

0:34:31.239 --> 0:34:34.520
<v Speaker 1>than he's had. J. P. Lassman and Classen and Gather.

0:34:34.680 --> 0:34:37.080
<v Speaker 1>There's some guys that's Alex Smith, Eli Manning right, that's

0:34:37.080 --> 0:34:39.120
<v Speaker 1>start and you think they have no chance. And I

0:34:39.120 --> 0:34:42.319
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't put Derek Carr in that category, but you look

0:34:42.360 --> 0:34:45.440
<v Speaker 1>at what he did versus what Boardles showed. I could

0:34:45.480 --> 0:34:48.239
<v Speaker 1>see the traits from Bordles. I mean, he looks like

0:34:48.280 --> 0:34:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Cam Newton out there. He was more athletic than I

0:34:51.000 --> 0:34:53.840
<v Speaker 1>than I thought. I mean, he there's one place j J. J.

0:34:53.960 --> 0:34:56.279
<v Speaker 1>Watt comes in untouched. He shakes J. J. Watt and

0:34:56.280 --> 0:34:58.240
<v Speaker 1>makes him look like a clown, runs for thirty yards

0:34:58.239 --> 0:35:01.800
<v Speaker 1>and you know in a two minute drill. We can't

0:35:01.800 --> 0:35:03.920
<v Speaker 1>forget what we saw in the preseason. Mark fell in

0:35:03.920 --> 0:35:06.719
<v Speaker 1>love with Bordles last preseason and you were high on

0:35:06.719 --> 0:35:08.800
<v Speaker 1>it too, and I just I can't get that image

0:35:08.800 --> 0:35:10.799
<v Speaker 1>out of my mind. How well he played before. His

0:35:10.880 --> 0:35:14.040
<v Speaker 1>mechanics just devolved during the season where he's throwing like

0:35:14.040 --> 0:35:17.080
<v Speaker 1>a baseball pitcher. So to me, he's the hardest. He is.

0:35:17.080 --> 0:35:19.279
<v Speaker 1>His back foot's coming up and he's winding up on

0:35:19.320 --> 0:35:22.360
<v Speaker 1>his throws. He's losing velocity because of it. I mean,

0:35:22.400 --> 0:35:25.600
<v Speaker 1>he talked and he talked about wasn't it opposed to

0:35:25.640 --> 0:35:27.839
<v Speaker 1>one up yesterday? That he that is what His arm

0:35:27.920 --> 0:35:29.719
<v Speaker 1>just tired out at the end of the year, he was.

0:35:30.040 --> 0:35:31.960
<v Speaker 1>That's one of the challenges of the rookie quarterback. You

0:35:32.000 --> 0:35:34.200
<v Speaker 1>go from playing a certain amount of games to an

0:35:34.200 --> 0:35:36.719
<v Speaker 1>intense season long thing. If you're playing borders, that is

0:35:36.719 --> 0:35:39.279
<v Speaker 1>not easy. They put a lot on his plate more

0:35:39.400 --> 0:35:41.319
<v Speaker 1>than any other rookie. I thought he had the most

0:35:41.360 --> 0:35:44.200
<v Speaker 1>working against him. Everyone wants to see Derek Carr. He

0:35:44.320 --> 0:35:46.160
<v Speaker 1>was stuck on the Raiders, That's true. He had the

0:35:46.200 --> 0:35:49.160
<v Speaker 1>best protection of any of these quarterbacks by far. He

0:35:49.239 --> 0:35:52.240
<v Speaker 1>had very good protection. I would say overall, the Raiders

0:35:52.280 --> 0:35:56.920
<v Speaker 1>had an above average past protection. The Jaguars were terrible.

0:35:57.480 --> 0:35:59.680
<v Speaker 1>They were terrible. He had no chance on a lot

0:35:59.719 --> 0:36:02.360
<v Speaker 1>of plays. It's seventeen nothing half the time before he

0:36:02.400 --> 0:36:05.319
<v Speaker 1>does anything wrong. And I think Mettenberger had a very

0:36:05.360 --> 0:36:08.520
<v Speaker 1>similar situation with a bad offensive line and a bad defense.

0:36:08.560 --> 0:36:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Boardles also who had nothing but rookie wide receivers and

0:36:11.200 --> 0:36:13.560
<v Speaker 1>no tight end. I mean the receivers didn't even know

0:36:13.560 --> 0:36:15.360
<v Speaker 1>where they were going, so that he's got that problem.

0:36:15.480 --> 0:36:17.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean almost to a man. This group of quarterbacks

0:36:17.560 --> 0:36:21.520
<v Speaker 1>played on talent poor offenses with which teams had already

0:36:21.520 --> 0:36:25.680
<v Speaker 1>have coaching. What happened draft in early round quarter It's true,

0:36:25.760 --> 0:36:30.120
<v Speaker 1>but Boardles, five or six plays a game, did something

0:36:30.560 --> 0:36:33.239
<v Speaker 1>that ten or twelve starters in the NFL can't do.

0:36:34.080 --> 0:36:36.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, he would make someone miss, he could, he

0:36:36.640 --> 0:36:39.800
<v Speaker 1>could improvise pretty well. He can throw a big deep

0:36:39.800 --> 0:36:43.200
<v Speaker 1>out across the field. He was very aggressive, and the

0:36:43.239 --> 0:36:45.319
<v Speaker 1>thing that impressed me, I thought he improved a lot

0:36:45.320 --> 0:36:47.640
<v Speaker 1>in his decision making, even though the you know, the

0:36:47.640 --> 0:36:49.839
<v Speaker 1>mechanics kind of fell apart, maybe the arm, you know,

0:36:50.280 --> 0:36:52.400
<v Speaker 1>he seemed more like a veteran quarterback by the end.

0:36:52.400 --> 0:36:56.120
<v Speaker 1>That's why he's number two. Derek Carr was terrible in December.

0:36:56.360 --> 0:36:58.640
<v Speaker 1>If all you had watched was December, he was no

0:36:58.680 --> 0:37:01.640
<v Speaker 1>different than Jimmy Clawson. Boardles I thought, got a little

0:37:01.640 --> 0:37:05.400
<v Speaker 1>bit better as the season went along. Bridgewater was sensational

0:37:05.440 --> 0:37:08.440
<v Speaker 1>in December. Until that point, they were all pretty close,

0:37:08.800 --> 0:37:11.120
<v Speaker 1>but he closed the season with a better five game

0:37:11.200 --> 0:37:16.480
<v Speaker 1>stretch than any rookie completion percentage and finished December is

0:37:16.520 --> 0:37:19.880
<v Speaker 1>pro football focus is number one quarterback. You make a

0:37:19.920 --> 0:37:24.120
<v Speaker 1>good point, then that doesn't shock me. He looked like

0:37:24.120 --> 0:37:26.759
<v Speaker 1>an above average starter, and I like the fact he's

0:37:26.760 --> 0:37:29.160
<v Speaker 1>almost He's not a flashy guy, but he's impressive to watch.

0:37:29.239 --> 0:37:31.799
<v Speaker 1>Here's why this exercise makes sense because if you want

0:37:31.840 --> 0:37:34.640
<v Speaker 1>to go get all caught up and oh look ahead

0:37:34.680 --> 0:37:37.880
<v Speaker 1>to next week's rookies. Right at the top of the article,

0:37:37.880 --> 0:37:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Greg points out that in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, eight

0:37:41.280 --> 0:37:45.280
<v Speaker 1>of seventeen personnel folks pulled by the newspaper had Johnny

0:37:45.320 --> 0:37:48.120
<v Speaker 1>Manzel at the top of their list, and he's at

0:37:48.120 --> 0:37:50.320
<v Speaker 1>the bottom of yours, and he should be. Yeah, and

0:37:50.440 --> 0:37:57.840
<v Speaker 1>only two had Bridgewater. I believe only two had and

0:37:58.040 --> 0:38:00.840
<v Speaker 1>one actually had Mettenburger, which is in the shocking too.

0:38:01.120 --> 0:38:05.120
<v Speaker 1>So Johnny Manzel was the consensus guy. He was Mayax guy.

0:38:05.280 --> 0:38:07.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he was DJ's guy. To his credit,

0:38:07.239 --> 0:38:09.400
<v Speaker 1>DJ had Bridgewater number one, but he was all the

0:38:09.400 --> 0:38:11.759
<v Speaker 1>big guys guy. And now, I mean, let's be honest,

0:38:11.760 --> 0:38:14.200
<v Speaker 1>where would Johnny Manzel would be drafted if the draft

0:38:14.239 --> 0:38:15.960
<v Speaker 1>was happening right now if we knew what we knew

0:38:16.040 --> 0:38:18.240
<v Speaker 1>right now, Yeah, if it was just starting over. Basically,

0:38:18.280 --> 0:38:19.680
<v Speaker 1>what would a team give up for him in a

0:38:19.960 --> 0:38:23.279
<v Speaker 1>in a trade if he's coming out of school right

0:38:23.280 --> 0:38:25.440
<v Speaker 1>now versus now if he's coming out of rehab and

0:38:25.480 --> 0:38:27.279
<v Speaker 1>you know how he looked as a rookie. I mean,

0:38:27.400 --> 0:38:29.799
<v Speaker 1>unless you want to look at the one very abstract

0:38:30.280 --> 0:38:32.840
<v Speaker 1>instance of a team trading for Brett Farve after he

0:38:32.920 --> 0:38:35.080
<v Speaker 1>came out of when he had all sorts of issues

0:38:35.120 --> 0:38:37.520
<v Speaker 1>off the field. But that's a different player. I don't

0:38:37.520 --> 0:38:39.919
<v Speaker 1>think he got any sixth round draft pick. Yeah, yeah,

0:38:40.040 --> 0:38:42.480
<v Speaker 1>he could be part of another deal, potentially fifth or

0:38:42.560 --> 0:38:45.360
<v Speaker 1>sixth round. I mean, the the game he had against

0:38:45.360 --> 0:38:48.720
<v Speaker 1>Cincinnati was the worst game any any of these rookies played.

0:38:48.719 --> 0:38:50.840
<v Speaker 1>I thought I was discouraged by that game because it

0:38:50.960 --> 0:38:53.480
<v Speaker 1>just looked like he was too small. Yeah. Yes, he

0:38:53.560 --> 0:38:55.520
<v Speaker 1>does not look the part on any level. I thought

0:38:55.520 --> 0:38:58.040
<v Speaker 1>against the Bills after he had the touchdown March and

0:38:58.040 --> 0:39:00.360
<v Speaker 1>then he got flat on the next r have you

0:39:00.400 --> 0:39:02.600
<v Speaker 1>thought this guy is not ready for prime time? There

0:39:02.600 --> 0:39:05.520
<v Speaker 1>were two plays actually was in the Carolina game, which

0:39:05.560 --> 0:39:08.560
<v Speaker 1>to me was his welcome to the NFL moment third

0:39:08.560 --> 0:39:10.920
<v Speaker 1>and long, he's trying to get to the edge and

0:39:11.000 --> 0:39:13.520
<v Speaker 1>star little to Laila beats him there and he doesn't

0:39:13.520 --> 0:39:16.040
<v Speaker 1>get the first down. And then I don't know if

0:39:16.040 --> 0:39:18.479
<v Speaker 1>you remember the play, he got injured and that ended

0:39:18.480 --> 0:39:22.200
<v Speaker 1>his season. Mark was it was a designed run where

0:39:22.480 --> 0:39:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Luke Kickley easily beat him to the edge, hit him,

0:39:25.680 --> 0:39:28.279
<v Speaker 1>and he got hurt and that was it. It was like,

0:39:28.520 --> 0:39:31.120
<v Speaker 1>you're not pulling off any of those cool Johnny football

0:39:31.160 --> 0:39:33.560
<v Speaker 1>improv plays anymore. Yeah. I mean, one of the hardest

0:39:33.560 --> 0:39:36.920
<v Speaker 1>things is to judge how an electric playmaker, you know,

0:39:37.000 --> 0:39:38.440
<v Speaker 1>you last year at this time we all thought that's

0:39:38.480 --> 0:39:40.840
<v Speaker 1>what he was gonna be in college. What second to

0:39:40.840 --> 0:39:42.799
<v Speaker 1>be at the NFL level. I look at Mariota, I'm

0:39:42.840 --> 0:39:45.840
<v Speaker 1>just as concerned about the offense he came from and

0:39:45.880 --> 0:39:47.440
<v Speaker 1>what that means if you stick him into a pro

0:39:47.520 --> 0:39:50.319
<v Speaker 1>style offense. We don't know. Yeah, it's so it's so

0:39:50.400 --> 0:39:52.760
<v Speaker 1>hard to project. I think the difference, you know, Man's

0:39:52.760 --> 0:39:55.680
<v Speaker 1>out seemed like he didn't know the playbook as well

0:39:55.680 --> 0:39:57.399
<v Speaker 1>as he should. If he didn't put it off, you know,

0:39:57.640 --> 0:40:00.319
<v Speaker 1>we know he didn't, right, So it's not exact like

0:40:00.400 --> 0:40:03.239
<v Speaker 1>a scientist going to work here like, yeah, Mariotta, at

0:40:03.320 --> 0:40:07.120
<v Speaker 1>least we think could quickly on Mettenberger. West, you don't.

0:40:07.160 --> 0:40:09.360
<v Speaker 1>You think he's a total statue. And my comparison for

0:40:09.400 --> 0:40:14.000
<v Speaker 1>him is Carry Collins, maybe a little younger Carry Collins

0:40:14.160 --> 0:40:17.799
<v Speaker 1>or early career bled So I disagree. I think there

0:40:17.880 --> 0:40:20.600
<v Speaker 1>was some pocket movement. You know, there was potential. He

0:40:20.600 --> 0:40:23.239
<v Speaker 1>he did make those little slides to open up a

0:40:23.239 --> 0:40:26.120
<v Speaker 1>few extra seconds, but he didn't throw anything out of

0:40:26.120 --> 0:40:30.359
<v Speaker 1>the pocket. He is in nineteen nineties, you know Mark

0:40:30.440 --> 0:40:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Wilson for the Raiders or whatever, nineteen eighties guy on

0:40:33.560 --> 0:40:35.560
<v Speaker 1>tech mobile that just kind of drops back and just

0:40:35.640 --> 0:40:37.880
<v Speaker 1>throws it as hard as he can. I mean, a

0:40:37.920 --> 0:40:41.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of coaches if you have that, they want that over.

0:40:41.560 --> 0:40:43.799
<v Speaker 1>You can run around all over the place, which you

0:40:43.800 --> 0:40:46.640
<v Speaker 1>can't operate from the pocket. Coaches told Greg Cosell. After

0:40:46.719 --> 0:40:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Greg Costell said he would draft Zach Mettenberger over Jamis Winston,

0:40:50.920 --> 0:40:53.200
<v Speaker 1>he said he heard from many NFL guys in the

0:40:53.239 --> 0:40:57.680
<v Speaker 1>coaching community who agreed with him. I thought Mettenberger showed

0:40:57.680 --> 0:40:59.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot. I'm surprised. I'm really surprised that you don't

0:40:59.640 --> 0:41:02.560
<v Speaker 1>like him at all, West, because a lot of the

0:41:02.560 --> 0:41:04.800
<v Speaker 1>things that went against him, I didn't think was his fault,

0:41:04.800 --> 0:41:07.280
<v Speaker 1>and like Bortles, he had a lot of flashy plays

0:41:07.320 --> 0:41:10.000
<v Speaker 1>that were really impressive. Well, I mean, we've we've gone

0:41:10.000 --> 0:41:12.320
<v Speaker 1>over this ground before, but it's all not on the podcast.

0:41:12.360 --> 0:41:15.600
<v Speaker 1>We haven't. I've gotten messages from Titans fans tell me

0:41:15.680 --> 0:41:18.000
<v Speaker 1>to quit picking on Za met A guy. I mean,

0:41:18.719 --> 0:41:21.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't like that. He's got one of the highest

0:41:21.680 --> 0:41:24.680
<v Speaker 1>failed drive percentages in the NFL history. He never won

0:41:24.680 --> 0:41:27.520
<v Speaker 1>a game in six starts. They weren't really competitive. He

0:41:27.600 --> 0:41:30.400
<v Speaker 1>didn't move the offense consistently, which bothers me more than

0:41:30.440 --> 0:41:33.319
<v Speaker 1>it bothers some people. I can't stand watching quarterbacks a lot,

0:41:33.360 --> 0:41:36.360
<v Speaker 1>three or four quarters without moving the offense. Uh, he's

0:41:36.440 --> 0:41:39.600
<v Speaker 1>he's injury prone. Finished the last two years on the sidelines,

0:41:39.880 --> 0:41:41.840
<v Speaker 1>and he's a statue. I believe he's a statue. You

0:41:41.840 --> 0:41:43.839
<v Speaker 1>believe he has a movement. I think he's a late

0:41:43.880 --> 0:41:46.600
<v Speaker 1>career Carrie Collins. He can't escape pressure. He's got a

0:41:46.640 --> 0:41:49.640
<v Speaker 1>long wind up that's gonna get him in trouble, I think,

0:41:50.280 --> 0:41:52.799
<v Speaker 1>and I think he's inaccurate. So I don't see he's

0:41:52.800 --> 0:41:54.680
<v Speaker 1>got a big I don't I don't think he's inaccurate

0:41:54.719 --> 0:41:58.040
<v Speaker 1>at all. He's aggressive, he can he can deliver while

0:41:58.239 --> 0:42:01.520
<v Speaker 1>under pressure, which is a skill in the NFL. I

0:42:01.520 --> 0:42:05.080
<v Speaker 1>don't think he's inaccurate, and I do think there was

0:42:05.120 --> 0:42:07.680
<v Speaker 1>just something to him that I know this is insane,

0:42:07.719 --> 0:42:10.200
<v Speaker 1>but if there was a category for pretty passes that

0:42:10.239 --> 0:42:12.560
<v Speaker 1>were dropped, Mettenberger would be late in the league. There

0:42:12.600 --> 0:42:14.640
<v Speaker 1>were there were a lot of thirty five yard ropes

0:42:14.960 --> 0:42:17.759
<v Speaker 1>down the sidelines over an outstretched hand that that went

0:42:17.800 --> 0:42:19.960
<v Speaker 1>off a Titans you know hand. I can't believe the

0:42:20.000 --> 0:42:22.759
<v Speaker 1>West hasn't used what is maybe the best bit of

0:42:22.760 --> 0:42:25.759
<v Speaker 1>an artillery against Mettenburger's that you've already seen him in

0:42:25.760 --> 0:42:29.640
<v Speaker 1>an offense with Odell Beckham and Jarvis Landry. What more

0:42:29.719 --> 0:42:32.560
<v Speaker 1>is he gonna get? In Tennessee's point, he's a great

0:42:32.600 --> 0:42:37.080
<v Speaker 1>scientific experiment. Can you win in two thousand and fifteen

0:42:37.120 --> 0:42:39.760
<v Speaker 1>being a statue? And can you win with that haircut

0:42:39.760 --> 0:42:42.040
<v Speaker 1>that he's got? All right, let's move to the tight ends.

0:42:42.080 --> 0:42:47.240
<v Speaker 1>I like his haircut. Uh, you've got who well Sessler

0:42:47.280 --> 0:42:49.080
<v Speaker 1>on the top of your list. The the little bit

0:42:49.120 --> 0:42:51.040
<v Speaker 1>of a difference here is because we're coming off a

0:42:51.080 --> 0:42:55.120
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver class, which is maybe the best ever most

0:42:55.160 --> 0:42:59.359
<v Speaker 1>exciting in decades, and the tight end class I thought

0:42:59.360 --> 0:43:02.040
<v Speaker 1>in general compared to some of the hype coming out

0:43:02.040 --> 0:43:04.600
<v Speaker 1>of the draft, especially when the Detroit Lions go out

0:43:04.600 --> 0:43:10.120
<v Speaker 1>and draft Eric Ebron tenth. Overall, the finished results were underwhelming.

0:43:10.400 --> 0:43:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Certainly statistically anyone that picked these guys up in fantasy

0:43:13.960 --> 0:43:16.239
<v Speaker 1>thinking this is gonna save me, it's a big late

0:43:16.280 --> 0:43:18.520
<v Speaker 1>season pick up. Well, it's not like these guys just

0:43:18.600 --> 0:43:21.359
<v Speaker 1>did not pull it off. But what changed my mind

0:43:21.360 --> 0:43:24.440
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about two of them, which was Eric

0:43:24.480 --> 0:43:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Ebron and Austin Seferian Jenkins, was I think there's hope

0:43:28.000 --> 0:43:30.480
<v Speaker 1>for these two. I really do. Looking at them, I don't.

0:43:30.480 --> 0:43:32.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what that projects too long term, but

0:43:32.719 --> 0:43:35.000
<v Speaker 1>I looked at the way they were drafted, which was Ebron,

0:43:35.320 --> 0:43:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Seferian Jenkins, and tomorrow. And I don't change that order

0:43:39.080 --> 0:43:40.879
<v Speaker 1>because part of this exerc So how would you change

0:43:40.880 --> 0:43:43.839
<v Speaker 1>it for me? What I saw? I think Ebron is

0:43:44.520 --> 0:43:47.399
<v Speaker 1>the most interesting player still among this group, and he's

0:43:47.440 --> 0:43:51.200
<v Speaker 1>in a good situation there. It's extremely rare for a

0:43:51.280 --> 0:43:53.600
<v Speaker 1>tight end to come in as a rookie and meat expectations,

0:43:53.680 --> 0:43:56.960
<v Speaker 1>much less exceed them. One of the herd like Jimmy Graham,

0:43:57.000 --> 0:44:02.200
<v Speaker 1>you know all kinds of um I can't think of it,

0:44:02.239 --> 0:44:05.759
<v Speaker 1>but there are a lot of gronk. Only as a

0:44:05.800 --> 0:44:08.040
<v Speaker 1>rookie tight end is so hard because you have to learn,

0:44:08.400 --> 0:44:10.160
<v Speaker 1>you have to learn how to block, you have to

0:44:10.239 --> 0:44:12.879
<v Speaker 1>learn how to catch. It's just a lot's going on. Yeah,

0:44:12.920 --> 0:44:15.719
<v Speaker 1>and one looking at kind of some stories about each

0:44:15.719 --> 0:44:17.800
<v Speaker 1>of these guys too, and just hearing their own words

0:44:17.840 --> 0:44:20.000
<v Speaker 1>that kind of they all owned up to the fact

0:44:20.040 --> 0:44:22.320
<v Speaker 1>that they were lost for a big part of the season.

0:44:22.520 --> 0:44:25.320
<v Speaker 1>And that's probably not untrue of the quarterback situation too.

0:44:25.719 --> 0:44:27.759
<v Speaker 1>But they're the only guy out there that's asked to

0:44:27.800 --> 0:44:30.640
<v Speaker 1>be a pass catcher in some cases. And I saw,

0:44:30.840 --> 0:44:33.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, especially with Ebron, like they used him in

0:44:33.280 --> 0:44:35.759
<v Speaker 1>a way which was almost low risk. For part of

0:44:35.760 --> 0:44:37.920
<v Speaker 1>the season. He had a lot of it work in

0:44:37.960 --> 0:44:40.200
<v Speaker 1>the flats and they'd asked him to kind of crack

0:44:40.239 --> 0:44:42.480
<v Speaker 1>off a tackle, quickly turn and catch a pass for

0:44:42.560 --> 0:44:45.160
<v Speaker 1>five yards. They used him in the same pattern over

0:44:45.239 --> 0:44:48.160
<v Speaker 1>and over. But then he showed these flashes. I think

0:44:48.200 --> 0:44:49.640
<v Speaker 1>when he got out of his head a little bit

0:44:49.840 --> 0:44:52.000
<v Speaker 1>and he let his body take over. You start to

0:44:52.000 --> 0:44:55.280
<v Speaker 1>see what's down the road with him and Safarian Jenkins especially.

0:44:55.320 --> 0:44:58.000
<v Speaker 1>I think I think that in Tampa Safarian Jenkins may

0:44:58.040 --> 0:45:00.399
<v Speaker 1>make a big leap this year too, because no one

0:45:00.920 --> 0:45:04.400
<v Speaker 1>part of his situation. They had issues with the quarterback.

0:45:04.440 --> 0:45:06.480
<v Speaker 1>They and they can't keep the quarterback on his feet.

0:45:06.640 --> 0:45:09.200
<v Speaker 1>They had no offensive coordinator last season. You now go

0:45:09.280 --> 0:45:11.719
<v Speaker 1>to Dirk Cotter, who has done a great job with

0:45:11.800 --> 0:45:14.200
<v Speaker 1>tight ends in the past. He's got a full offseason.

0:45:14.600 --> 0:45:17.200
<v Speaker 1>I think he's gonna have a He made double his statistics,

0:45:17.200 --> 0:45:19.080
<v Speaker 1>if not more. Yeah, he was really disappointed to me

0:45:19.160 --> 0:45:20.920
<v Speaker 1>last year because I liked him in that draft. I

0:45:20.960 --> 0:45:23.719
<v Speaker 1>thought he was gonna be a big time huge like

0:45:23.840 --> 0:45:25.520
<v Speaker 1>he brought out a lot of drops, didn't He He

0:45:25.560 --> 0:45:29.320
<v Speaker 1>didn't know, I mean, make a bone headed mistake every

0:45:29.320 --> 0:45:31.680
<v Speaker 1>time I looked. I don't remember, though, I mean that's

0:45:31.719 --> 0:45:33.600
<v Speaker 1>just what you remember from watching the game on TV.

0:45:33.719 --> 0:45:36.320
<v Speaker 1>He did seemed like he wasn't really good at contesting catches.

0:45:36.520 --> 0:45:38.319
<v Speaker 1>Well there was one there a couple of times where

0:45:38.360 --> 0:45:40.720
<v Speaker 1>he's bobbling the catch, and to me, it just seemed

0:45:40.719 --> 0:45:43.280
<v Speaker 1>that he's so up in his head that he couldn't

0:45:43.760 --> 0:45:46.640
<v Speaker 1>just let the gifts that would have been present in

0:45:46.680 --> 0:45:49.440
<v Speaker 1>college even the year before work because he's got the

0:45:49.520 --> 0:45:52.120
<v Speaker 1>size and he's got a great burst. One thing about

0:45:52.200 --> 0:45:55.200
<v Speaker 1>him is like he could he could quickly like get

0:45:55.239 --> 0:45:58.000
<v Speaker 1>past the line, get into space, catch the ball and

0:45:58.000 --> 0:46:00.520
<v Speaker 1>he'd be five years five yards ahead and the flash

0:46:00.800 --> 0:46:02.880
<v Speaker 1>and you pick up that yardage and that burst is

0:46:02.920 --> 0:46:05.279
<v Speaker 1>what separates him from a guy like Richard Rogers, who

0:46:05.360 --> 0:46:08.120
<v Speaker 1>had a better statistical rookie. Sometimes it's in a much

0:46:08.160 --> 0:46:10.560
<v Speaker 1>better quarterback. Yeah, sometimes the NFL has to go the

0:46:10.600 --> 0:46:13.640
<v Speaker 1>way of the players that are coming in at This

0:46:13.719 --> 0:46:16.279
<v Speaker 1>is an ugly tight end class overall, at least to start.

0:46:16.360 --> 0:46:19.240
<v Speaker 1>We'll see Jayson Morrow could get better. You think Richard

0:46:19.320 --> 0:46:22.360
<v Speaker 1>Rodgers definitely showed potential. Crockett Gilmore was a good, you know,

0:46:22.440 --> 0:46:25.360
<v Speaker 1>mid round pick, but this upcoming tight end class is

0:46:25.400 --> 0:46:28.160
<v Speaker 1>also supposed to be terrible. Think about the quarterbacks of

0:46:28.160 --> 0:46:30.799
<v Speaker 1>the last two years. Teddy Bridgewater is the only one

0:46:30.840 --> 0:46:33.719
<v Speaker 1>that I'm really confident is gonna be at least a

0:46:33.760 --> 0:46:36.759
<v Speaker 1>mid level starter. I think his floor is Alex Smith,

0:46:36.800 --> 0:46:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Randy Dalton, and I think his ceiling is somewhere closer

0:46:39.320 --> 0:46:41.640
<v Speaker 1>to Drew Brees or Philip Rivers. But other than that,

0:46:41.880 --> 0:46:44.359
<v Speaker 1>like we could have a couple of straight years without

0:46:44.400 --> 0:46:47.080
<v Speaker 1>really any big time tight ends or quarterbacks. How does

0:46:47.120 --> 0:46:50.280
<v Speaker 1>that happen? It's it's weird, especially at the tight end position,

0:46:50.320 --> 0:46:52.520
<v Speaker 1>because you think we'd start to buy now start to

0:46:52.520 --> 0:46:55.080
<v Speaker 1>see more of these types coming up. But a lot

0:46:55.080 --> 0:46:56.680
<v Speaker 1>of it has to do with what they're asked to

0:46:56.719 --> 0:46:58.520
<v Speaker 1>do with the college level, I guess. I mean some

0:46:58.560 --> 0:47:01.040
<v Speaker 1>guys who made a lot of plays and college didn't

0:47:01.080 --> 0:47:03.520
<v Speaker 1>even appear on this list. Rogers was you were thinking

0:47:03.520 --> 0:47:05.680
<v Speaker 1>about early on being a little higher up? For Well,

0:47:05.680 --> 0:47:07.319
<v Speaker 1>he's the first guy watched and I got a little

0:47:07.360 --> 0:47:09.359
<v Speaker 1>excited about him. But then when I that the thing

0:47:09.400 --> 0:47:11.480
<v Speaker 1>was when I went and watched the others closer, you

0:47:11.520 --> 0:47:14.120
<v Speaker 1>see the difference in their athleticism. I think that Rogers

0:47:14.640 --> 0:47:17.240
<v Speaker 1>really really he only had one drop at a twenty

0:47:17.239 --> 0:47:19.960
<v Speaker 1>one catchable balls, and to me, yes he had. He

0:47:19.960 --> 0:47:22.680
<v Speaker 1>showed good hands, he had some good contested catches, got

0:47:22.719 --> 0:47:24.719
<v Speaker 1>better as the season went on. But that is right,

0:47:24.840 --> 0:47:27.239
<v Speaker 1>that's Aaron Rodgers putting the ball right where it needs

0:47:27.280 --> 0:47:29.400
<v Speaker 1>to be. What about Jason Morrow is to play with

0:47:29.440 --> 0:47:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Geno Smith and Michael Vick that had you have to

0:47:31.640 --> 0:47:33.759
<v Speaker 1>factor into that fact that Tomorrow was in a West

0:47:33.800 --> 0:47:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Coast offense coming from Texas Tech. That's not a good

0:47:36.640 --> 0:47:38.960
<v Speaker 1>fit out of the gate. Might be better with Shan Gailey.

0:47:39.040 --> 0:47:41.400
<v Speaker 1>There was one game with Tomorrow where it looked like

0:47:41.440 --> 0:47:44.000
<v Speaker 1>the light was finally flashing. It was the Broncs game

0:47:44.000 --> 0:47:46.480
<v Speaker 1>where he had ten catchup and he made a few plays.

0:47:46.520 --> 0:47:48.960
<v Speaker 1>He did, he made and he's down field too versus

0:47:49.000 --> 0:47:51.160
<v Speaker 1>just four yards upfield, and then he went back to

0:47:51.280 --> 0:47:53.719
<v Speaker 1>mistakes after that. Yeah, he did. I just think that

0:47:53.840 --> 0:47:56.160
<v Speaker 1>was not a good fit. He He also is someone

0:47:56.200 --> 0:47:59.319
<v Speaker 1>that he hit. The athleticism drop off between the first

0:47:59.320 --> 0:48:03.400
<v Speaker 1>two and Tomorrow was for me, very noticeable. I love it.

0:48:04.000 --> 0:48:06.239
<v Speaker 1>I love getting a little crock At Gilmore into the show.

0:48:06.400 --> 0:48:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Jason Morrow, you had Gilmore five. That's your tight end rankings.

0:48:10.680 --> 0:48:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Those are gonna be dropping over the weekend, really Friday

0:48:13.880 --> 0:48:16.239
<v Speaker 1>into Saturday. You guys can check it out next week.

0:48:16.320 --> 0:48:20.319
<v Speaker 1>NFL dot Com Slash around the NFL. This is a

0:48:20.400 --> 0:48:23.720
<v Speaker 1>nice little football nerdy show. I mean, we're diving into

0:48:23.760 --> 0:48:28.200
<v Speaker 1>the deep, you know, sees of Jarvis Landry and Richard

0:48:28.360 --> 0:48:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Rogers and now we're gonna welcome in one of the

0:48:32.080 --> 0:48:36.200
<v Speaker 1>nerdiest guys at the entire NFL media news group, Daniel Jeremiah.

0:48:36.239 --> 0:48:38.160
<v Speaker 1>This is a segment Mark, you weren't here for it,

0:48:38.520 --> 0:48:42.000
<v Speaker 1>just to warn Yeah, I mean, I'm just telling them again.

0:48:42.040 --> 0:48:45.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, people that love the Sessler you can probably

0:48:45.480 --> 0:48:47.600
<v Speaker 1>turn it off right now. That's a big segment of

0:48:47.600 --> 0:48:50.319
<v Speaker 1>our female population. They just like listening to Mark and

0:48:52.400 --> 0:48:55.799
<v Speaker 1>staring up at the ceiling. All right, let's bring in

0:48:55.920 --> 0:48:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Daniel Jeremiah. Let's talk a little bit about the draft.

0:48:58.719 --> 0:49:01.160
<v Speaker 1>We taped this segment on D Day with Dan hansis

0:49:01.360 --> 0:49:03.759
<v Speaker 1>in the mix, so I'll send it over to Dan. Now.

0:49:04.280 --> 0:49:06.400
<v Speaker 1>All right, here we go our guests in the studio

0:49:06.480 --> 0:49:09.960
<v Speaker 1>right now. Former scout for the Eagles, Browns and Ravens,

0:49:10.640 --> 0:49:16.000
<v Speaker 1>former quarterback at Appalachian State. Yeah, that's cool. He's now

0:49:16.000 --> 0:49:18.719
<v Speaker 1>an anchor of our draft coverage here at NFL Network.

0:49:18.920 --> 0:49:21.160
<v Speaker 1>You can see my Path to the Draft. Check out

0:49:21.160 --> 0:49:23.799
<v Speaker 1>his latest mocks in NFL dot com. He also has

0:49:23.840 --> 0:49:27.560
<v Speaker 1>a podcast, Moved the Sticks. Podcasts available for download right now.

0:49:27.760 --> 0:49:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Daniel Jeremiah, Welcome to the Round the NFL pod about

0:49:31.080 --> 0:49:35.040
<v Speaker 1>imagining that right was? He just is this what normally

0:49:35.080 --> 0:49:37.960
<v Speaker 1>happens around here? He kind of he kind of murmured

0:49:37.960 --> 0:49:40.279
<v Speaker 1>that TD always talks about the same team. Right, we're

0:49:40.280 --> 0:49:42.640
<v Speaker 1>all you know, he does all rolling in the same direction,

0:49:42.680 --> 0:49:45.719
<v Speaker 1>except this has to be. I was gonna say, this

0:49:45.760 --> 0:49:47.600
<v Speaker 1>has to be. And I'm very happy to have DJ

0:49:47.719 --> 0:49:50.279
<v Speaker 1>in the studio. This is exciting. Probably a tough moment

0:49:50.320 --> 0:49:53.040
<v Speaker 1>for TV. He was looking at all his children behind

0:49:53.040 --> 0:49:55.720
<v Speaker 1>the glass. He doesn't know. You know, every every parent

0:49:55.800 --> 0:49:57.600
<v Speaker 1>really has a favorite. They never want to say it,

0:49:57.680 --> 0:50:01.600
<v Speaker 1>but we know who the favorite. Say it? Yeah, man, Kyle,

0:50:01.760 --> 0:50:03.640
<v Speaker 1>give me a break. Yeah. It's like the one time

0:50:03.640 --> 0:50:06.160
<v Speaker 1>you have to choose between Billick and Mary Uchi, which

0:50:06.360 --> 0:50:09.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, scintillating analysis. Did you have to go with DJ?

0:50:09.160 --> 0:50:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Did you know that um Brian Billick does the Coaches

0:50:12.200 --> 0:50:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Show show with the ball and chain and hatched him

0:50:15.239 --> 0:50:18.520
<v Speaker 1>keep him in the studio. It's true story, all right. Anyway,

0:50:18.600 --> 0:50:22.399
<v Speaker 1>DJ is here. How exciting. Uh, the draft is upon us.

0:50:22.680 --> 0:50:25.680
<v Speaker 1>It's very close. Now you'll be heading to Chicago win

0:50:27.760 --> 0:50:33.719
<v Speaker 1>Monday Tuesday, t d Oh, next question? Oh wow, so

0:50:33.800 --> 0:50:36.600
<v Speaker 1>we're going there? Hete hate hate. Hey, I'm beginning to

0:50:36.680 --> 0:50:38.839
<v Speaker 1>think like, oh, to have a conversation with Greg, Greg,

0:50:41.920 --> 0:50:43.719
<v Speaker 1>just a little pick behind the curtain. There was some

0:50:43.840 --> 0:50:46.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, consternation. DJ is tougher to book than the president.

0:50:47.000 --> 0:50:49.480
<v Speaker 1>At this time of year, you just even get ten minutes.

0:50:49.560 --> 0:50:52.560
<v Speaker 1>I feel like by the end of this, I'm just

0:50:52.560 --> 0:50:55.200
<v Speaker 1>saying that didn't help the hands is on the black list.

0:50:57.239 --> 0:50:58.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to be there, and I'm just saying

0:50:58.600 --> 0:51:00.840
<v Speaker 1>that didn't help some of the hands this dj B.

0:51:01.040 --> 0:51:03.840
<v Speaker 1>But well, let's talk a little bit at least. All right,

0:51:03.960 --> 0:51:06.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at your mom, I'm looking at your top

0:51:06.880 --> 0:51:10.080
<v Speaker 1>fifty players overall, A ton of a lot of papers up. Yeah,

0:51:10.080 --> 0:51:14.000
<v Speaker 1>I decided to print about why not very environmentally keep

0:51:14.560 --> 0:51:19.360
<v Speaker 1>I keep hearing all the good edge rushers in this class,

0:51:19.400 --> 0:51:22.040
<v Speaker 1>give me a break. I like, I like looking at

0:51:22.040 --> 0:51:24.680
<v Speaker 1>the paper. Okay, go for it. All these ad dressers

0:51:24.680 --> 0:51:27.960
<v Speaker 1>in this class, it's almost hard to keep each one

0:51:28.000 --> 0:51:31.600
<v Speaker 1>of them straight. Who is your favorite addresser? And kind

0:51:31.600 --> 0:51:35.000
<v Speaker 1>of what what separates the top guys for you between

0:51:35.040 --> 0:51:39.320
<v Speaker 1>like Fowler and Shane Ray? You know everyone at the top.

0:51:39.320 --> 0:51:40.759
<v Speaker 1>You got a bunch of them. There's a whole host

0:51:40.760 --> 0:51:43.360
<v Speaker 1>of them. Look in terms of just pure talent. You know,

0:51:43.560 --> 0:51:45.439
<v Speaker 1>my initial list that I came out with had Randy

0:51:45.440 --> 0:51:47.799
<v Speaker 1>Gregory at the very top, and I still believe he's

0:51:47.840 --> 0:51:49.920
<v Speaker 1>the most talented edge rusher in the draft, when you're

0:51:49.920 --> 0:51:53.160
<v Speaker 1>putting together your own personal big board. I I envisioned, Okay,

0:51:53.160 --> 0:51:54.920
<v Speaker 1>if I'm running a team, this is you know how

0:51:54.960 --> 0:51:57.359
<v Speaker 1>I would stack my players. And I ended up moving

0:51:57.360 --> 0:52:00.759
<v Speaker 1>Gregory down because they're significant off field risk involved with him.

0:52:00.800 --> 0:52:03.600
<v Speaker 1>So to me, I look at Dante Fowler. You want

0:52:03.640 --> 0:52:06.239
<v Speaker 1>somebody that's twitched up, that's athletic, that can bend, can

0:52:06.280 --> 0:52:08.719
<v Speaker 1>do all the everything you wanted to see. He does it.

0:52:09.080 --> 0:52:11.000
<v Speaker 1>At Florida. They asked him to drop a lot, so

0:52:11.040 --> 0:52:14.040
<v Speaker 1>the numbers are aren't as great in the sack productions. Okay,

0:52:14.040 --> 0:52:18.399
<v Speaker 1>it's not terrible, but great. Kid plays hard, explosive, all

0:52:18.400 --> 0:52:20.239
<v Speaker 1>that stuff checks the box. So to me, he's the

0:52:20.239 --> 0:52:23.040
<v Speaker 1>top guy. And and then after that, I look at

0:52:23.040 --> 0:52:25.640
<v Speaker 1>Shane Ray from Missouri and some people he talked to scouts,

0:52:25.680 --> 0:52:27.000
<v Speaker 1>some of them are down on him because he's got

0:52:27.000 --> 0:52:29.319
<v Speaker 1>real skinny lower half. He doesn't have kind of that

0:52:29.400 --> 0:52:33.520
<v Speaker 1>ideal body um and he's not a real real fluid athlete.

0:52:34.040 --> 0:52:35.680
<v Speaker 1>But what he does, he's got a lot of shock

0:52:35.719 --> 0:52:37.000
<v Speaker 1>in his hips. He's got a lot of shock in

0:52:37.080 --> 0:52:39.000
<v Speaker 1>his hands. That's what you want shock in the hip.

0:52:39.120 --> 0:52:40.600
<v Speaker 1>You want to be able to roll your hips like

0:52:40.640 --> 0:52:42.319
<v Speaker 1>that could be able to roll your hips and so

0:52:42.400 --> 0:52:44.880
<v Speaker 1>he can do that. Great. I like this kind of

0:52:45.080 --> 0:52:47.440
<v Speaker 1>have to say it's shock in the hip. You know what, Actually,

0:52:47.440 --> 0:52:49.960
<v Speaker 1>while you're talking, you're giving out all these scout terms. Yeah,

0:52:49.960 --> 0:52:55.160
<v Speaker 1>I hear twitchy and he's a twitch quick twitch athlete.

0:52:55.200 --> 0:52:57.880
<v Speaker 1>What does that? What does that even mean? Is one

0:52:57.880 --> 0:53:00.719
<v Speaker 1>of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard.

0:53:01.520 --> 0:53:04.600
<v Speaker 1>It just it means just. It's another word for explosive.

0:53:05.080 --> 0:53:08.320
<v Speaker 1>And and you know people talk about Odell Beckham quit's

0:53:08.320 --> 0:53:10.640
<v Speaker 1>not yet. Yes, it's not just you know a forty

0:53:10.760 --> 0:53:13.040
<v Speaker 1>that's not being quick twitch. I mean quick twitches means

0:53:13.080 --> 0:53:15.880
<v Speaker 1>boom right away, like you get off the line, your sudden.

0:53:16.040 --> 0:53:17.920
<v Speaker 1>That's another word that we would use here. So that's

0:53:18.040 --> 0:53:20.279
<v Speaker 1>kind of definitely. I remember when Adam Archioletta was a

0:53:20.360 --> 0:53:24.240
<v Speaker 1>quick twitch athlete. That's been many moons. What's the hottest

0:53:24.560 --> 0:53:26.799
<v Speaker 1>what's the hottest buzz adjective in the game right now?

0:53:27.440 --> 0:53:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Hottest buzz adjective? Let's get to see he's answering the question, Um, yeah, look,

0:53:32.719 --> 0:53:35.520
<v Speaker 1>come on, we we will work past it or professionals. Yeah,

0:53:35.520 --> 0:53:37.320
<v Speaker 1>it's it's sushi dat to day. Do you eat sushi,

0:53:37.480 --> 0:53:43.879
<v Speaker 1>not not here. No. I used to have a rule

0:53:43.880 --> 0:53:45.319
<v Speaker 1>for real that if I can't see water, I'm not

0:53:45.320 --> 0:53:47.960
<v Speaker 1>eating sushi. But I've been lucky the last few times,

0:53:48.160 --> 0:53:50.360
<v Speaker 1>so I've kind of broke my own rule. I like

0:53:50.400 --> 0:53:55.000
<v Speaker 1>our sushi here. Um. But the buzz word in scouting gosh,

0:53:55.480 --> 0:53:58.399
<v Speaker 1>um quick twitches up there, quick twitches way up there?

0:53:59.320 --> 0:54:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Um twitched up. I like that heavy legged waistbender. Yeah,

0:54:02.600 --> 0:54:04.640
<v Speaker 1>we talked. We always talk about guys having FBI, which

0:54:04.680 --> 0:54:07.799
<v Speaker 1>is football intelligence. M I like that one. You're writing

0:54:07.800 --> 0:54:11.120
<v Speaker 1>that one down. Just start using that every day and

0:54:11.120 --> 0:54:13.640
<v Speaker 1>then let me see what else we got here. Is

0:54:13.800 --> 0:54:20.440
<v Speaker 1>verticality verdicality using fast at it? Okay, verticality, that's not

0:54:20.920 --> 0:54:23.239
<v Speaker 1>that's not using like more of an NBA center thing. Yeah,

0:54:23.760 --> 0:54:25.600
<v Speaker 1>that's j Bill. If if any come up over the

0:54:25.640 --> 0:54:30.200
<v Speaker 1>course you have another question. The two in a row,

0:54:30.280 --> 0:54:32.040
<v Speaker 1>this is good. I might get another C O D

0:54:32.200 --> 0:54:34.000
<v Speaker 1>by the way, is a good one. Dead on arrival

0:54:34.160 --> 0:54:39.080
<v Speaker 1>ce CEO delivery, change the direction, that's good. I like that.

0:54:39.880 --> 0:54:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Athletes are good at changing. I'm looking at you have

0:54:41.960 --> 0:54:45.520
<v Speaker 1>scout potential. I'm looking at Daniel's latest UM two round

0:54:45.520 --> 0:54:48.520
<v Speaker 1>mock draft, which you can find it NFL dot com.

0:54:48.640 --> 0:54:50.200
<v Speaker 1>By the way, the only person in the building that

0:54:50.239 --> 0:54:53.560
<v Speaker 1>refers to me by my full first Daniel. Yeah, I

0:54:53.640 --> 0:54:56.640
<v Speaker 1>love it. You're gonna be out in Johnson. You're gonna

0:54:56.680 --> 0:55:01.920
<v Speaker 1>bake me some cookies to grandma Daniels could talk together.

0:55:02.080 --> 0:55:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Come on bro alright. Um that song, by the way,

0:55:05.000 --> 0:55:07.280
<v Speaker 1>that Elton john song is a kid and it looks

0:55:07.360 --> 0:55:10.279
<v Speaker 1>like that. Yeah, my grandmother used to know. She didn't

0:55:10.280 --> 0:55:13.120
<v Speaker 1>there was the old Slights Heaven for Spain. Yeah, boy, Danny,

0:55:15.360 --> 0:55:20.799
<v Speaker 1>my grandmother play on the but I don't know if

0:55:20.800 --> 0:55:23.279
<v Speaker 1>you've ever listened to the lyrics. Yeah, Daniel is flying

0:55:23.320 --> 0:55:25.880
<v Speaker 1>tonight on a plane. Yes, when you get a little older,

0:55:25.880 --> 0:55:27.480
<v Speaker 1>you start to try to piece together what the song

0:55:27.560 --> 0:55:29.680
<v Speaker 1>is actually about. I spend many an hour trying to

0:55:29.680 --> 0:55:32.239
<v Speaker 1>piece that song together. Um, you have Amari Cooper at

0:55:32.320 --> 0:55:35.359
<v Speaker 1>number nine to the Giants, and uh, that jumps out

0:55:35.400 --> 0:55:38.120
<v Speaker 1>to me. Literally, you're literally scratching your head. Yeah, a

0:55:38.200 --> 0:55:42.560
<v Speaker 1>little bit better. He's talking about my modcraft while he's scratching,

0:55:42.600 --> 0:55:46.880
<v Speaker 1>he said, very subtle, very subtle. So Chris Westling is

0:55:46.960 --> 0:55:49.760
<v Speaker 1>actually literally in love with Odell Beckham with good reason.

0:55:50.120 --> 0:55:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Victor Cruz, a stud before the knee injury. Is this

0:55:53.520 --> 0:55:56.400
<v Speaker 1>DJ's way of saying, perhaps the Giants are already starting

0:55:56.440 --> 0:55:59.120
<v Speaker 1>to look beyond Victor Cruz or no, I just can't pass. Look,

0:55:59.120 --> 0:56:01.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, let's see what happ Victor Cruz health.

0:56:01.120 --> 0:56:02.760
<v Speaker 1>But he's gonna play in the slot. That's not gonna

0:56:02.840 --> 0:56:04.440
<v Speaker 1>mess with what you would have on the outside with

0:56:04.520 --> 0:56:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Cooper and with Odell Becking. What would mean? You know,

0:56:07.040 --> 0:56:10.440
<v Speaker 1>obviously our guy from l s U, Reuben Ran, Ruben Randall,

0:56:10.480 --> 0:56:12.880
<v Speaker 1>thank you wouldn't be great for Reuben. Reuben wouldn't love

0:56:12.920 --> 0:56:15.560
<v Speaker 1>that pick. But you know, look, there's talk to different

0:56:15.560 --> 0:56:18.480
<v Speaker 1>people around the league, and there is some school of

0:56:18.560 --> 0:56:20.919
<v Speaker 1>thought where even, look, we had the two physical teams

0:56:20.920 --> 0:56:22.239
<v Speaker 1>in the Super Bowl. I get it. So it's been

0:56:22.280 --> 0:56:24.120
<v Speaker 1>easy for us all to say, Okay, it's about running

0:56:24.120 --> 0:56:26.879
<v Speaker 1>the football, it's about you know, being physical. But there's

0:56:26.880 --> 0:56:28.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people, when you talked about the leg

0:56:28.280 --> 0:56:29.759
<v Speaker 1>that feel like the way the rules have changed, the

0:56:29.800 --> 0:56:32.440
<v Speaker 1>way the game has changed, screw it, don't We're just

0:56:32.440 --> 0:56:35.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna try and outscore everybody we play. And so there's

0:56:35.320 --> 0:56:36.960
<v Speaker 1>some thought there. You look at the Giants and man

0:56:36.960 --> 0:56:39.120
<v Speaker 1>that you you look at that matchup situation you'd have

0:56:39.239 --> 0:56:41.320
<v Speaker 1>with those guys on the field the same time. Wow,

0:56:41.520 --> 0:56:43.759
<v Speaker 1>well it's interesting. You don't have any receivers going in

0:56:43.800 --> 0:56:46.640
<v Speaker 1>the top eighty, have four pass thrushers, a couple of

0:56:46.680 --> 0:56:50.400
<v Speaker 1>defensive lignemen, and then two quarterbacks. Well, the Raiders I

0:56:50.440 --> 0:56:52.960
<v Speaker 1>think would take a wide out if Leonard Williams wasn't there.

0:56:53.080 --> 0:56:55.920
<v Speaker 1>But in this situation, with everything I'm hearing and talking to,

0:56:55.920 --> 0:56:58.120
<v Speaker 1>people are saying, Okay, Mario is gonna go to might

0:56:58.120 --> 0:57:00.040
<v Speaker 1>not be Tennessee, but somebody's gonna take him with a

0:57:00.080 --> 0:57:05.560
<v Speaker 1>second pink Tennessee. Uh that's why I everything everybody that

0:57:05.560 --> 0:57:07.440
<v Speaker 1>I've talked to you just said he's going to go second,

0:57:07.480 --> 0:57:10.319
<v Speaker 1>and people that I really really trust. And so there's

0:57:10.360 --> 0:57:12.919
<v Speaker 1>there's either Tennessee or some other suitors. I lean tend

0:57:12.960 --> 0:57:14.759
<v Speaker 1>to lean towards them making a trade and somebody else

0:57:14.800 --> 0:57:17.080
<v Speaker 1>coming in there. Um. But so you take the two

0:57:17.160 --> 0:57:19.680
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks off the board, then you're at number three. I

0:57:19.720 --> 0:57:22.840
<v Speaker 1>think Jacksonville Leonard Williams is a great player, But you've

0:57:22.840 --> 0:57:26.040
<v Speaker 1>resigned Tyson Alo Alo, You've got uh, you signed the

0:57:26.080 --> 0:57:28.280
<v Speaker 1>guy from Miami, what's his name from Penn State, Jared Odrick.

0:57:28.640 --> 0:57:30.040
<v Speaker 1>You've got some Derek Mark, so I think it is

0:57:30.040 --> 0:57:31.920
<v Speaker 1>one of the best interior pass rushers in the NFL.

0:57:31.960 --> 0:57:34.000
<v Speaker 1>So they Leonard Williams for them is not as big

0:57:34.000 --> 0:57:36.000
<v Speaker 1>a need. They need an edge rusher. So that's why

0:57:36.320 --> 0:57:38.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that just drops Leonard Williams right into the

0:57:38.280 --> 0:57:41.160
<v Speaker 1>lap of the Oakland Raiders, your number one player, which

0:57:41.160 --> 0:57:43.000
<v Speaker 1>surprised me. What do you how do you answer the

0:57:43.040 --> 0:57:46.160
<v Speaker 1>people that say Leonard Williams like very toolsy. You know,

0:57:46.240 --> 0:57:48.200
<v Speaker 1>he looks like the guy that you can project to

0:57:48.240 --> 0:57:50.200
<v Speaker 1>being a great player, but his tape really isn't that

0:57:50.240 --> 0:57:53.080
<v Speaker 1>and maybe maybe a two down player, not a pass rusher.

0:57:53.160 --> 0:57:56.840
<v Speaker 1>That's that's crap. That's because he's here number one player.

0:57:57.800 --> 0:58:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Tell us what, We'll go back and watch him last year.

0:58:00.120 --> 0:58:01.640
<v Speaker 1>First of all, when he's fully healthy. He got a

0:58:01.720 --> 0:58:04.360
<v Speaker 1>high ankle spring like. One of the criticisms he gets

0:58:04.440 --> 0:58:06.600
<v Speaker 1>is against Stanford, which to me is this is why

0:58:06.680 --> 0:58:09.240
<v Speaker 1>fly by scouting is so dangerous when you don't have

0:58:09.280 --> 0:58:12.960
<v Speaker 1>all the information that's a good scouting turn fly by scouting. Yeah,

0:58:13.000 --> 0:58:20.680
<v Speaker 1>that's my favorite. Dan wrote that all these draft nicks, um,

0:58:20.800 --> 0:58:24.960
<v Speaker 1>he's got hr speed by the way. There you go, Uh, no,

0:58:25.080 --> 0:58:27.000
<v Speaker 1>but I mean, look, where are we Where are we

0:58:27.000 --> 0:58:30.600
<v Speaker 1>talking last year? So so this year, a lot of

0:58:30.640 --> 0:58:32.800
<v Speaker 1>people have talked about, oh, the Stanford game. You know,

0:58:32.840 --> 0:58:35.040
<v Speaker 1>that's an NFL type offensive line and he didn't do it.

0:58:35.280 --> 0:58:37.800
<v Speaker 1>The guy had a high ankle spring that week in practice,

0:58:38.240 --> 0:58:39.919
<v Speaker 1>He's not supposed to play in the game. He comes

0:58:39.920 --> 0:58:42.200
<v Speaker 1>out for warm ups for like five minutes. They take

0:58:42.280 --> 0:58:44.320
<v Speaker 1>him off the field, which I assume he probably goes

0:58:44.360 --> 0:58:46.840
<v Speaker 1>and gets a shot um. He ends up coming out

0:58:46.880 --> 0:58:49.240
<v Speaker 1>with a heavily wrapped ankle. He plays guts through at

0:58:49.320 --> 0:58:52.240
<v Speaker 1>USC upset Stanford. He played solid. He had a couple

0:58:52.240 --> 0:58:54.240
<v Speaker 1>of destructive plays, but he's not gonna look to use

0:58:54.280 --> 0:58:56.120
<v Speaker 1>the word ultra twitched up when you just had a

0:58:56.200 --> 0:58:58.560
<v Speaker 1>high ankle spring on Tuesday of game week, and so

0:58:58.560 --> 0:59:00.320
<v Speaker 1>so many be like I watched him against I'm like,

0:59:00.880 --> 0:59:02.640
<v Speaker 1>he wasn't even healthy in that game. Go watch him

0:59:02.640 --> 0:59:04.760
<v Speaker 1>when he's healthy last year, and watch we did this year.

0:59:04.760 --> 0:59:07.560
<v Speaker 1>He never comes off the field. I just look, I

0:59:07.800 --> 0:59:10.560
<v Speaker 1>see a guy with length, with strength, he's got quickness.

0:59:10.600 --> 0:59:12.400
<v Speaker 1>What they asked him to do in that defense, a

0:59:12.440 --> 0:59:14.480
<v Speaker 1>three man front, They're asking him to sit there and

0:59:14.520 --> 0:59:16.560
<v Speaker 1>anchor down. He'd do that all day long. He'll press

0:59:16.600 --> 0:59:18.960
<v Speaker 1>off blocks. So who's he like for people I guess

0:59:18.960 --> 0:59:20.720
<v Speaker 1>who don't know what much about Like I've said it,

0:59:20.800 --> 0:59:23.120
<v Speaker 1>I know Max said it before. I've used the Richard

0:59:23.120 --> 0:59:25.440
<v Speaker 1>Seymour comp and to me, it's because he has that

0:59:25.560 --> 0:59:29.120
<v Speaker 1>versatility to move him around and body type wise they're similar.

0:59:29.160 --> 0:59:31.320
<v Speaker 1>They're kind of got like a there long they're they're

0:59:31.320 --> 0:59:34.120
<v Speaker 1>smooth muscled guys, they're not just you know, there's different

0:59:34.120 --> 0:59:36.800
<v Speaker 1>types there. People up and throw him. That's what Seymour

0:59:36.840 --> 0:59:39.360
<v Speaker 1>could do his first few years. He does. He does

0:59:39.440 --> 0:59:41.320
<v Speaker 1>not like Danny Shelton. If you want to watch somebody

0:59:41.320 --> 0:59:43.600
<v Speaker 1>throw people, watch Danny Shelton and Washington watch him against

0:59:43.600 --> 0:59:47.920
<v Speaker 1>Stanford where he literally forklifts dude thanks background, literally like

0:59:47.920 --> 0:59:50.920
<v Speaker 1>he drove a fork to the field and took like

0:59:51.040 --> 0:59:53.160
<v Speaker 1>that lifted him up and dumped him. What's going on

0:59:53.240 --> 0:59:55.640
<v Speaker 1>now that you're rising? By the way, can I give

0:59:55.640 --> 0:59:58.200
<v Speaker 1>you my favorite day? My my favorite you talk about

0:59:58.240 --> 1:00:00.880
<v Speaker 1>scouting terms had an old scout And I've told this

1:00:00.920 --> 1:00:03.840
<v Speaker 1>on on my podcast, which is the Move the Sticks podcast.

1:00:06.160 --> 1:00:09.560
<v Speaker 1>I think this is gonna edit out post. Dan's gonna physically,

1:00:10.120 --> 1:00:13.360
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna we're gonna We're gonna be the master file. Um.

1:00:13.440 --> 1:00:15.280
<v Speaker 1>So we had an old scout his name was Ron

1:00:15.320 --> 1:00:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Marsenack with the Baltimore Ravens, and when he was talking

1:00:18.520 --> 1:00:20.160
<v Speaker 1>about a player one day, I literally lost it in

1:00:20.160 --> 1:00:21.880
<v Speaker 1>the draft for him because he's reading his report. So

1:00:21.880 --> 1:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>he literally wrote this in the computer and he said, Uh,

1:00:24.960 --> 1:00:28.080
<v Speaker 1>this player, uh you know, it's never not not any production.

1:00:28.200 --> 1:00:30.440
<v Speaker 1>He leads the league in high fives and butt slaps

1:00:30.480 --> 1:00:32.600
<v Speaker 1>because that's he gets there just in time to high

1:00:32.600 --> 1:00:34.200
<v Speaker 1>five a teammate or pat him on the butt for

1:00:34.320 --> 1:00:37.960
<v Speaker 1>making the play. He read. Wrote in his report, it's like, okay,

1:00:38.120 --> 1:00:41.560
<v Speaker 1>my favorite scouting term ever was about a baseball slash

1:00:41.600 --> 1:00:45.720
<v Speaker 1>football player, Adam Dunn. Yeah. Uh, the Red's baseball scout.

1:00:45.760 --> 1:00:47.360
<v Speaker 1>He signed him. I think his name was Julian Mott

1:00:47.720 --> 1:00:50.600
<v Speaker 1>wrote and wrote on the scouner report, so big he

1:00:50.680 --> 1:00:58.240
<v Speaker 1>hunts bear with a switch playing a little football topical. Um,

1:00:58.280 --> 1:00:59.960
<v Speaker 1>you're a couple of months later on that one west

1:01:00.200 --> 1:01:03.680
<v Speaker 1>you are. You are, your profiles rising by the year

1:01:03.880 --> 1:01:06.440
<v Speaker 1>as like a draft nick. Let's face it, you're becoming

1:01:06.440 --> 1:01:09.000
<v Speaker 1>a known quantity in the industry. A big fan of

1:01:09.040 --> 1:01:12.840
<v Speaker 1>that word now because you like draft expert draft analysts

1:01:12.840 --> 1:01:15.880
<v Speaker 1>and draft Nick implies like a basement, and you know

1:01:15.960 --> 1:01:19.280
<v Speaker 1>you don't shade plus plus you give us the NFL.

1:01:19.320 --> 1:01:21.080
<v Speaker 1>And now says, I don't like the draft people that

1:01:21.560 --> 1:01:23.720
<v Speaker 1>all draft all the time. I want a little NFL.

1:01:23.920 --> 1:01:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Now that's true. Now here's here's an interesting point on that,

1:01:26.840 --> 1:01:29.520
<v Speaker 1>because that is true, and I always we always cross checked.

1:01:29.880 --> 1:01:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Not every team does this. Some teams you're a college scout,

1:01:32.760 --> 1:01:34.480
<v Speaker 1>so you just watch college players. That's it. You don't

1:01:34.480 --> 1:01:36.560
<v Speaker 1>have to do with any of the NFL stuff. Um,

1:01:36.600 --> 1:01:39.560
<v Speaker 1>but Ozzy did it, and uh and and Phil Savage

1:01:39.720 --> 1:01:42.560
<v Speaker 1>as well, coming from that school. Was in the training camp,

1:01:42.640 --> 1:01:44.440
<v Speaker 1>we would go out and watch different proteins, would have

1:01:44.480 --> 1:01:46.800
<v Speaker 1>players were responsible for. We'd be ready for cutdown day,

1:01:47.000 --> 1:01:49.360
<v Speaker 1>which was nice because many hands make light work in

1:01:49.440 --> 1:01:51.760
<v Speaker 1>order to look at all the different players. But it

1:01:51.800 --> 1:01:53.880
<v Speaker 1>was always helpful for me to go back and see

1:01:53.920 --> 1:01:56.560
<v Speaker 1>guys in the NFL that you had scouted, to really see, Okay,

1:01:56.600 --> 1:01:58.680
<v Speaker 1>who's doing well, guys I hit on, guys I missed

1:01:58.680 --> 1:02:00.520
<v Speaker 1>on kind of self of value. Wait and then you

1:02:00.560 --> 1:02:03.240
<v Speaker 1>realize what's playing and you look at who's starting. Like

1:02:03.280 --> 1:02:06.360
<v Speaker 1>to me, offensive linement for young scouts is hard because

1:02:06.400 --> 1:02:08.240
<v Speaker 1>you have it in your mind you've got to be

1:02:08.280 --> 1:02:11.400
<v Speaker 1>this long athletic and you know these Jonathan Ogden we

1:02:11.440 --> 1:02:14.080
<v Speaker 1>had in both, like, those guys are so rare. Just

1:02:14.120 --> 1:02:15.520
<v Speaker 1>give me a guy. If you look at the who's

1:02:15.520 --> 1:02:17.880
<v Speaker 1>playing in the NFL the offensive line, you're smart, you're tough,

1:02:17.920 --> 1:02:19.680
<v Speaker 1>and you can anchor. If you can do those three things,

1:02:19.720 --> 1:02:21.400
<v Speaker 1>you can play. So we thought, oh, he's not a

1:02:21.400 --> 1:02:23.120
<v Speaker 1>bad athlete, or he's on the ground here, They're like,

1:02:23.240 --> 1:02:25.120
<v Speaker 1>look around the NFL. Look what's playing it right tackle?

1:02:25.120 --> 1:02:26.640
<v Speaker 1>In this league? Those guys are gonna play. Do you

1:02:26.680 --> 1:02:29.840
<v Speaker 1>think there's too many guys in your business that you know,

1:02:29.920 --> 1:02:31.920
<v Speaker 1>once these guys get drafted, they don't check back in

1:02:32.000 --> 1:02:33.600
<v Speaker 1>on him, and that could lead to I don't know,

1:02:33.680 --> 1:02:35.560
<v Speaker 1>I can't. I think I think it's very helpful to

1:02:35.600 --> 1:02:37.400
<v Speaker 1>do it. It puts me behind, you know, with the

1:02:37.440 --> 1:02:40.320
<v Speaker 1>draft process, because you do the NFL stuff during the

1:02:40.320 --> 1:02:41.760
<v Speaker 1>fall and then all of a sudden boom, we gotta

1:02:41.840 --> 1:02:43.840
<v Speaker 1>change years and really get rolling on the draft. I've

1:02:43.880 --> 1:02:47.600
<v Speaker 1>got a question that will test your micro draft knowledge

1:02:47.640 --> 1:02:53.680
<v Speaker 1>and your macro NFL knowledge is now. I know you

1:02:53.920 --> 1:02:56.360
<v Speaker 1>you probably love the word buzz there's now buzz that

1:02:56.360 --> 1:02:59.600
<v Speaker 1>he could go in the top ten on a macro level.

1:03:00.640 --> 1:03:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Is this devaluation of running backs overrated. If you're a

1:03:03.440 --> 1:03:05.880
<v Speaker 1>three down power back, you're still gonna get money and

1:03:05.880 --> 1:03:07.840
<v Speaker 1>you're still gonna be valued highly. I think so that

1:03:08.000 --> 1:03:12.280
<v Speaker 1>grow micro devaluation money. I feel like this econ class,

1:03:12.320 --> 1:03:13.880
<v Speaker 1>what's going on? You don't act like you're not just

1:03:13.880 --> 1:03:19.080
<v Speaker 1>watching the replay of a EPL game, but it's you're

1:03:19.080 --> 1:03:21.200
<v Speaker 1>doing good. No, look to me, these are two of

1:03:21.280 --> 1:03:22.960
<v Speaker 1>the best backs we've seen come out in quite some time.

1:03:22.960 --> 1:03:25.080
<v Speaker 1>When you look at Gordon and Gurley, I was surprised

1:03:25.120 --> 1:03:27.160
<v Speaker 1>you had them so close together. Yeah, I think I

1:03:27.240 --> 1:03:29.720
<v Speaker 1>think Gordon's a really, really good player. And you know,

1:03:29.720 --> 1:03:31.720
<v Speaker 1>while I was waiting to get medical back on Gurly,

1:03:32.400 --> 1:03:35.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm sitting here saying I know Gordon's healthy. So for

1:03:35.280 --> 1:03:36.960
<v Speaker 1>the first part of it, I had him one spot

1:03:37.000 --> 1:03:39.040
<v Speaker 1>over Girly, and then now the medicals come back pretty

1:03:39.080 --> 1:03:41.040
<v Speaker 1>clean on Girly. So like, Okay, I think I'd rather

1:03:41.120 --> 1:03:43.880
<v Speaker 1>roll with Todd. But both those guys are big time guys,

1:03:43.960 --> 1:03:46.400
<v Speaker 1>and I think we get carried away with a positional

1:03:46.440 --> 1:03:48.200
<v Speaker 1>thing and it's just kind of comes in waves and

1:03:48.240 --> 1:03:50.320
<v Speaker 1>we just haven't had those those backs roll through. And

1:03:50.320 --> 1:03:51.720
<v Speaker 1>I think this year that will put a stop to that.

1:03:51.760 --> 1:03:53.320
<v Speaker 1>I think we'll see both those guys go around one.

1:03:53.360 --> 1:03:55.960
<v Speaker 1>How about LT saying in our air waves that Todd

1:03:56.000 --> 1:03:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Gurley is the best running back prospects since Adrian Peterson.

1:03:59.200 --> 1:04:01.680
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people believe that. I think you pull

1:04:01.720 --> 1:04:03.800
<v Speaker 1>people around the NFL. They get scared when I hear that,

1:04:03.840 --> 1:04:08.000
<v Speaker 1>because exactly what everyone said about Trent Richard zactly No.

1:04:08.160 --> 1:04:10.439
<v Speaker 1>And look, Trent, I didn't have to do Trent when

1:04:10.440 --> 1:04:13.240
<v Speaker 1>he came out. I don't remember. I guess I was

1:04:13.280 --> 1:04:15.200
<v Speaker 1>in Philly. I think it was a Philly that you're

1:04:15.240 --> 1:04:16.960
<v Speaker 1>but he wouldn't. I didn't have to be a convenient

1:04:17.120 --> 1:04:19.640
<v Speaker 1>for you. Now, No, well I did, JaMarcus Russell if

1:04:19.640 --> 1:04:23.240
<v Speaker 1>you want to go down discussion. Um, but uh no,

1:04:23.520 --> 1:04:26.160
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I mean the way everybody talked about him,

1:04:26.240 --> 1:04:28.160
<v Speaker 1>But there's something there. I mean, I don't think this

1:04:28.240 --> 1:04:30.360
<v Speaker 1>is just a football issue with Trent Richardson because he

1:04:30.440 --> 1:04:35.120
<v Speaker 1>just looks so so lethargic the way he plays sluggle.

1:04:35.280 --> 1:04:37.600
<v Speaker 1>I'll leave that one alone. Um, all right, we should

1:04:37.680 --> 1:04:40.440
<v Speaker 1>let DJ go get his sushi. Momentarily, Greg, do you

1:04:40.440 --> 1:04:42.800
<v Speaker 1>have anything else you want? So many papers in front

1:04:42.800 --> 1:04:44.640
<v Speaker 1>of you, I had imagined there's got to be another

1:04:44.720 --> 1:04:46.760
<v Speaker 1>question in there. Greg once like a private two hour

1:04:46.800 --> 1:04:48.880
<v Speaker 1>conversation with j Well, how about you got you have

1:04:49.000 --> 1:04:52.280
<v Speaker 1>ten receivers in your think, which is outrageous. I think

1:04:52.280 --> 1:04:53.840
<v Speaker 1>I had ten in my top fifty last year, and

1:04:53.840 --> 1:04:56.240
<v Speaker 1>you know what, everybody said, that's crazy. There's no way

1:04:56.280 --> 1:04:58.440
<v Speaker 1>there's ten receivers. And then I'm like, let's go back

1:04:58.480 --> 1:05:00.000
<v Speaker 1>and look at those ten receivers. Which one is when

1:05:00.000 --> 1:05:03.280
<v Speaker 1>didn't play well last year? Oh? Zero? So you're saying

1:05:03.280 --> 1:05:06.080
<v Speaker 1>there this class, basically, this is what college football has

1:05:06.120 --> 1:05:08.840
<v Speaker 1>given us. And there's no cornerbacks. There's very few cornerbacks

1:05:08.880 --> 1:05:10.800
<v Speaker 1>in your top thirty. It's not a great not a

1:05:10.800 --> 1:05:13.400
<v Speaker 1>great group. You like Byron Jones not just a freaking athlete,

1:05:13.840 --> 1:05:15.400
<v Speaker 1>he's a player. No, I think he's gonna go. I

1:05:15.440 --> 1:05:16.680
<v Speaker 1>think he's a really good chance to go in the

1:05:16.720 --> 1:05:18.439
<v Speaker 1>first round if you had to take one of the

1:05:18.520 --> 1:05:21.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of second level wide receivers and running backs, maybe

1:05:21.920 --> 1:05:23.760
<v Speaker 1>guys that won't go in the top twenty who are

1:05:23.880 --> 1:05:25.880
<v Speaker 1>this is like, this is one of my favorite players

1:05:25.920 --> 1:05:28.480
<v Speaker 1>in the draft is David Copp from Minnesota, and I

1:05:28.520 --> 1:05:31.120
<v Speaker 1>think he could go in the fourth round, maybe gets

1:05:31.120 --> 1:05:34.240
<v Speaker 1>into the third round. But just he's we talked about shorty,

1:05:34.320 --> 1:05:36.840
<v Speaker 1>quickness of bet make people missing, tight quarters, vision, all

1:05:36.840 --> 1:05:38.520
<v Speaker 1>that stuff really really good. He's not gonna he's not

1:05:38.520 --> 1:05:42.080
<v Speaker 1>a fourth three guys. No, he's he's he's quick. I

1:05:42.080 --> 1:05:47.400
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't say he's a classic FBI c O d says

1:05:47.440 --> 1:05:52.160
<v Speaker 1>the says the butt slapper and the high fiber over here. Um. No, look,

1:05:52.360 --> 1:05:54.880
<v Speaker 1>I love David Copp from a receiver standpoint. Tyler Lockett

1:05:54.880 --> 1:05:58.360
<v Speaker 1>from Kansas State, who's like a poor man's t Y Hilton,

1:05:59.240 --> 1:06:01.160
<v Speaker 1>but which is not just a compliment. He's he's a

1:06:01.240 --> 1:06:03.200
<v Speaker 1>really really good player. Those guys keep slipping in the

1:06:03.240 --> 1:06:06.600
<v Speaker 1>draft who I helped in John Brown, those pretty well.

1:06:06.600 --> 1:06:08.040
<v Speaker 1>He can he can help you in the return game.

1:06:08.120 --> 1:06:09.640
<v Speaker 1>So I think he's gonna be a good value. And

1:06:09.680 --> 1:06:12.480
<v Speaker 1>just to finish my question that I started, So you're

1:06:12.760 --> 1:06:17.480
<v Speaker 1>you're rising up amongst draft analysts. Wait, he's waving his arm,

1:06:17.600 --> 1:06:21.400
<v Speaker 1>he's saying he's done. Come on, go ahead, go ahead,

1:06:23.320 --> 1:06:25.200
<v Speaker 1>go ahead. Do you have to have like a burner

1:06:25.240 --> 1:06:27.720
<v Speaker 1>phone at this point? Aren't there front office guys coming

1:06:27.760 --> 1:06:30.160
<v Speaker 1>at you all? The time people showing up in trench

1:06:30.240 --> 1:06:33.439
<v Speaker 1>coats whispering thing to handing a hundred dollar bills. What's

1:06:33.440 --> 1:06:39.800
<v Speaker 1>going on next question? Guys, you can read into that. Alright,

1:06:40.320 --> 1:06:42.600
<v Speaker 1>that's it. You know. I love you. I love you too, baby.

1:06:42.880 --> 1:06:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Daniel Jeremiah the Move the Sticks podcast, which really is

1:06:47.200 --> 1:06:49.560
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, something on the rise. It's something you

1:06:49.560 --> 1:06:52.320
<v Speaker 1>should check out if you haven't already. It's the show.

1:06:52.440 --> 1:06:54.880
<v Speaker 1>You can listen to it. Thanks you if you choose

1:06:54.920 --> 1:06:57.120
<v Speaker 1>America allows you to listen to it and also other

1:06:57.200 --> 1:07:00.240
<v Speaker 1>nations around the world. Uh DJ's podcast move This thinks

1:07:00.240 --> 1:07:03.800
<v Speaker 1>you can download it two to roll from me please.

1:07:04.200 --> 1:07:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Uh so, yeah, check that out and thank you d J.

1:07:07.280 --> 1:07:10.600
<v Speaker 1>All right, that was jovial time with Daniel Jeremiah. Learned

1:07:10.640 --> 1:07:12.680
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about the draft. Hopefully you learned a

1:07:12.760 --> 1:07:15.280
<v Speaker 1>little bit about the two thousand and fourteen draft. Den

1:07:15.360 --> 1:07:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Is gonna be really mad because once again the show

1:07:17.400 --> 1:07:20.200
<v Speaker 1>went really long when hands Is the sheriff was not around.

1:07:21.000 --> 1:07:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Happy birthday, Daniel. He's a great friend to all. Just

1:07:23.520 --> 1:07:26.600
<v Speaker 1>imagine if he answered the phone. Thank you, Dan for

1:07:26.680 --> 1:07:29.360
<v Speaker 1>all that you do and thanks to Mark Sessler, Chris

1:07:29.400 --> 1:07:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Wesselen and TV I'm Greg Rosenthal. We're gonna be back

1:07:33.120 --> 1:07:37.280
<v Speaker 1>next week with three big draft shows, including a draft preview.

1:07:37.440 --> 1:07:40.959
<v Speaker 1>Go get my lunch on Monday. Look at my lunch

1:07:40.960 --> 1:07:43.560
<v Speaker 1>clown car looking forward to that. We'll take that before

1:07:43.960 --> 1:07:46.400
<v Speaker 1>West heads over to Chicago, so that will drop on Monday.

1:07:46.800 --> 1:07:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Until then, we'll see you next time.