WEBVTT - The Hunt for Anon September

0:00:00.360 --> 0:00:03.960
<v Speaker 1>This is the buck Sexton Show, where the mission or

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:08.200
<v Speaker 1>mission is to decode what really matters with actionable intelligence.

0:00:10.360 --> 0:00:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Make no mistake, American, You're a great American. Again the

0:00:14.080 --> 0:00:23.720
<v Speaker 1>buck Sexton Show begins. No, hey, everybody, welcome to the

0:00:23.840 --> 0:00:27.320
<v Speaker 1>buck Sexton Show. Coming to you from Washington, d C.

0:00:28.120 --> 0:00:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Got a busy show today, folks. The Hunt for a

0:00:30.560 --> 0:00:34.440
<v Speaker 1>non September, which is what I'm calling that editorial writer,

0:00:34.560 --> 0:00:38.200
<v Speaker 1>the anonymous editorial writer in the White House, the deep

0:00:38.320 --> 0:00:41.599
<v Speaker 1>State Manifesto, another thing that I've come up with for it.

0:00:42.320 --> 0:00:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Trump is expected to declassify some reporting on that, declassifying

0:00:46.720 --> 0:00:50.479
<v Speaker 1>the FISA memo that was used, well, the FISA memos

0:00:50.479 --> 0:00:55.360
<v Speaker 1>in general that we're used for surveillance of Carter Page. Also,

0:00:55.640 --> 0:01:00.360
<v Speaker 1>Joseph miff sued the professor that Papadompolis interactively. He may

0:01:00.360 --> 0:01:04.360
<v Speaker 1>be dead. Obama is back. Jim Carrey says, we have

0:01:04.400 --> 0:01:09.240
<v Speaker 1>to say yes to socialism, and Serena Williams freaks out,

0:01:09.400 --> 0:01:12.080
<v Speaker 1>and then the social justice left comes to her aid,

0:01:12.760 --> 0:01:14.520
<v Speaker 1>let's get right to it with the the latest on

0:01:14.560 --> 0:01:17.959
<v Speaker 1>the the Hunt for Anonymous September, the Hunt for a

0:01:18.000 --> 0:01:22.440
<v Speaker 1>non September. I have to say I was originally of

0:01:22.480 --> 0:01:26.840
<v Speaker 1>the mindset that they would find out who this was

0:01:27.560 --> 0:01:30.679
<v Speaker 1>it was. It was originally in my thought process I

0:01:30.760 --> 0:01:35.920
<v Speaker 1>figured that this was a situation where they would definitely

0:01:36.720 --> 0:01:39.720
<v Speaker 1>out the person and just a question of when. Now

0:01:39.720 --> 0:01:44.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking, actually, maybe not, because the power of this

0:01:44.520 --> 0:01:49.200
<v Speaker 1>editorialist comes from the anonymity in a sense, right, the

0:01:49.240 --> 0:01:52.680
<v Speaker 1>media likes this because it creates this gray area, this

0:01:52.880 --> 0:01:58.040
<v Speaker 1>gray space for all of the anti Trumper's out there

0:01:58.240 --> 0:01:59.880
<v Speaker 1>to come up with a different reason for Hey, you

0:02:00.000 --> 0:02:03.640
<v Speaker 1>know what, maybe this is John Kelly. Hey, maybe it's

0:02:03.680 --> 0:02:06.360
<v Speaker 1>some other really important person in the White House. If

0:02:06.360 --> 0:02:08.919
<v Speaker 1>we were to find out that this wasn't a particularly

0:02:08.960 --> 0:02:12.359
<v Speaker 1>important person, then we would all be in a position

0:02:12.400 --> 0:02:15.160
<v Speaker 1>where we've got to take a long, hard look at

0:02:15.160 --> 0:02:19.640
<v Speaker 1>the editorial guidelines of the New York Times, which is

0:02:19.680 --> 0:02:22.639
<v Speaker 1>just a resistance rag. I mean, I don't think we

0:02:22.760 --> 0:02:26.000
<v Speaker 1>really have to be all that cautious about saying that

0:02:26.120 --> 0:02:29.840
<v Speaker 1>right in the New York Times is very honestly place

0:02:29.919 --> 0:02:34.079
<v Speaker 1>that is opposed to the President of the United States,

0:02:34.520 --> 0:02:37.760
<v Speaker 1>um And then honestly, from my perspective, right, they're not

0:02:37.840 --> 0:02:39.840
<v Speaker 1>honest about it. That's the problem. On the problem is

0:02:39.880 --> 0:02:42.960
<v Speaker 1>they still lie, but you know, you had over the

0:02:42.960 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 1>weekend Kelly and Conway and others going on the Sunday shows,

0:02:47.280 --> 0:02:50.040
<v Speaker 1>and they were taking the perspective on this, you know,

0:02:50.080 --> 0:02:54.239
<v Speaker 1>the various administration surrogates taking the perspective, well, of course

0:02:54.360 --> 0:02:57.400
<v Speaker 1>the person is cowardly and that this is so terrible

0:02:57.520 --> 0:03:00.280
<v Speaker 1>and the media shouldn't be focused on this at all.

0:03:00.919 --> 0:03:02.679
<v Speaker 1>What I would add to all of this is that

0:03:03.360 --> 0:03:06.960
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't It doesn't change anything. The only thing you

0:03:07.000 --> 0:03:09.880
<v Speaker 1>have here is somebody running around the White House who

0:03:10.000 --> 0:03:14.480
<v Speaker 1>has delusions of grandeur. It doesn't change the perceptions from

0:03:14.480 --> 0:03:16.959
<v Speaker 1>the Trump side or the anti Trump side of what's

0:03:16.960 --> 0:03:19.760
<v Speaker 1>really going on in the White House. Doesn't tell us

0:03:19.800 --> 0:03:25.000
<v Speaker 1>anything particularly new. What it does do is open up

0:03:25.120 --> 0:03:28.560
<v Speaker 1>endless rounds of speculation from the media about just exactly

0:03:29.120 --> 0:03:33.840
<v Speaker 1>what has happened here, and uh, you know, how powerful

0:03:33.919 --> 0:03:37.760
<v Speaker 1>this person, maybe how close his or her relationship with Trump?

0:03:37.800 --> 0:03:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Maybe so. I but I think that the media doesn't

0:03:40.800 --> 0:03:43.240
<v Speaker 1>really want to find out. And that's the big shift

0:03:43.320 --> 0:03:45.200
<v Speaker 1>in my thinking on this. That's why I'm saying it's

0:03:45.360 --> 0:03:48.400
<v Speaker 1>the hunt for a non September I don't think that

0:03:48.440 --> 0:03:52.040
<v Speaker 1>they really are going to it's gonna scratch it this

0:03:52.080 --> 0:03:53.640
<v Speaker 1>at all. I think they're just gonna let it be.

0:03:54.480 --> 0:03:56.520
<v Speaker 1>We know that the New York Times obviously knows a

0:03:56.640 --> 0:03:59.440
<v Speaker 1>number of people there no now they would say they

0:03:59.440 --> 0:04:03.200
<v Speaker 1>would protect this person interestingly enough as a source, I guess,

0:04:03.240 --> 0:04:05.800
<v Speaker 1>but they're not really. It's not really a source. It's

0:04:05.840 --> 0:04:09.320
<v Speaker 1>an editorial writer. It's a little different. It feels a

0:04:09.320 --> 0:04:12.440
<v Speaker 1>little different at least. And remember, all of these rules, folks,

0:04:12.480 --> 0:04:18.120
<v Speaker 1>are guidelines. They are not hard and fast truths. So

0:04:18.200 --> 0:04:20.680
<v Speaker 1>you have you have that happening right now. I don't

0:04:20.680 --> 0:04:22.640
<v Speaker 1>think that they're going to find the person, and I

0:04:22.640 --> 0:04:25.760
<v Speaker 1>think the media is complicit and continuing to to hide

0:04:26.240 --> 0:04:28.320
<v Speaker 1>the football on that one. And then you have another

0:04:29.040 --> 0:04:31.680
<v Speaker 1>series of stories that all tying together all around the

0:04:31.760 --> 0:04:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Russia collusion fantasy you have. For one, Trump is expected soon,

0:04:37.880 --> 0:04:44.640
<v Speaker 1>according to Axios here and other places, Trump may declassify.

0:04:44.960 --> 0:04:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Trump may decide to declassify the entirety of the Russia

0:04:50.800 --> 0:04:55.040
<v Speaker 1>probe FISA documents. Now, we've seen some of the FISA

0:04:55.080 --> 0:05:02.240
<v Speaker 1>documents with extensive redactions. What we've seen so far proves that, yes,

0:05:02.279 --> 0:05:04.880
<v Speaker 1>the dossier was, in fact a very important part of

0:05:04.880 --> 0:05:10.599
<v Speaker 1>all this, and that the members of the Congress and

0:05:10.720 --> 0:05:14.240
<v Speaker 1>the media who were claiming that the dossier was essentially

0:05:14.279 --> 0:05:16.120
<v Speaker 1>just thrown in there. I was like, you know, why

0:05:16.160 --> 0:05:20.760
<v Speaker 1>not that they're lying that that was not true? Now

0:05:20.800 --> 0:05:23.279
<v Speaker 1>they're only saving groce. Up to this point. The only

0:05:23.279 --> 0:05:27.680
<v Speaker 1>thing that prevents it from being completely irrefutable that the

0:05:27.760 --> 0:05:34.400
<v Speaker 1>document was a opposition hit piece essentially being passed around

0:05:34.440 --> 0:05:40.320
<v Speaker 1>the FBI is that they must have additional sourcing, real good,

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:44.320
<v Speaker 1>deep level sourcing on this one. And I just don't

0:05:44.320 --> 0:05:47.279
<v Speaker 1>see that being possible, or I shouldn't say possible, and

0:05:47.400 --> 0:05:50.400
<v Speaker 1>I see that being very unlikely. I don't think that's

0:05:50.400 --> 0:05:53.280
<v Speaker 1>going to be the case at all. And they are

0:05:53.320 --> 0:05:56.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna try and do everything in their power to hide

0:05:56.680 --> 0:05:59.039
<v Speaker 1>this under national under the guise of national security, They're

0:05:59.040 --> 0:06:03.039
<v Speaker 1>gonna say, well, we can't for national security reasons, we

0:06:03.120 --> 0:06:07.080
<v Speaker 1>cannot allow this information to get out there. Meanwhile, what

0:06:07.200 --> 0:06:11.240
<v Speaker 1>about the balancing of the presidency with the national security

0:06:11.240 --> 0:06:15.320
<v Speaker 1>concerns here? What about the fact that in this instance,

0:06:15.400 --> 0:06:19.200
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about a FISER request that has been used

0:06:19.240 --> 0:06:22.680
<v Speaker 1>as the basis for an investigation essentially, or FISER not

0:06:22.800 --> 0:06:27.440
<v Speaker 1>just requests, but fights a program finds a surveillance jim

0:06:27.440 --> 0:06:31.400
<v Speaker 1>box in a presidential administration really to try and continue

0:06:31.400 --> 0:06:35.960
<v Speaker 1>a silent coup, which is what I think we should

0:06:35.960 --> 0:06:40.040
<v Speaker 1>all recognize. This whole ridiculous collusion investigation is turned into

0:06:40.200 --> 0:06:42.280
<v Speaker 1>an effort at a silent coup. That that's what they

0:06:42.279 --> 0:06:44.400
<v Speaker 1>see is that's why the people who have been pushing

0:06:44.400 --> 0:06:47.839
<v Speaker 1>it all along. You'll notice that they get frustrated that

0:06:47.880 --> 0:06:51.440
<v Speaker 1>it's not more successful, but they're not worried even if

0:06:51.440 --> 0:06:53.520
<v Speaker 1>they find out at the end of the day, at

0:06:53.520 --> 0:06:56.440
<v Speaker 1>the end of the investigation, that everything they've been saying

0:06:56.520 --> 0:07:00.000
<v Speaker 1>is wrong. It served much of the original purpose would

0:07:00.160 --> 0:07:02.240
<v Speaker 1>was to hurt Trump. That's why they were doing this,

0:07:02.839 --> 0:07:04.720
<v Speaker 1>That's why they pushed so hard for it in the

0:07:04.760 --> 0:07:07.679
<v Speaker 1>early days. If you really look at the whole Russia

0:07:07.720 --> 0:07:12.119
<v Speaker 1>collusion investigation, you see that it was completely unnecessary. Based

0:07:12.120 --> 0:07:15.680
<v Speaker 1>on d J guidelines, the Department of Justice could have

0:07:15.800 --> 0:07:20.360
<v Speaker 1>done all the Russia interference aspects of the investigation. The

0:07:20.480 --> 0:07:24.080
<v Speaker 1>only way you had a conflict of interest that necessitated

0:07:24.400 --> 0:07:30.840
<v Speaker 1>some kind of special counsel. Uh situation comes specifically from

0:07:30.880 --> 0:07:33.840
<v Speaker 1>the notion that the Trump administration was a part of

0:07:33.880 --> 0:07:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the problem, or that the Trump campaign was a part

0:07:36.600 --> 0:07:39.080
<v Speaker 1>of the problem. That's the only reason you have a

0:07:39.120 --> 0:07:43.239
<v Speaker 1>special counsel. And then when you add into it the uh,

0:07:43.360 --> 0:07:47.240
<v Speaker 1>the Komby firing, which she realize is that this has

0:07:47.280 --> 0:07:49.800
<v Speaker 1>just been all a manufactured narrative from the left from

0:07:49.840 --> 0:07:52.840
<v Speaker 1>the very beginning. That's what's that's what's been going on here,

0:07:52.880 --> 0:07:55.840
<v Speaker 1>and and that's in the at the end of the day,

0:07:55.880 --> 0:07:58.840
<v Speaker 1>that's what we're gonna see happened. That's why I agree

0:07:58.880 --> 0:08:01.280
<v Speaker 1>with many other voices out there right now who are saying,

0:08:01.680 --> 0:08:06.160
<v Speaker 1>you got to release all the information, just declassify it.

0:08:06.400 --> 0:08:10.400
<v Speaker 1>Enough is enough, and that way we can finally make

0:08:10.440 --> 0:08:12.960
<v Speaker 1>then we can finally come to the conclusions about what

0:08:13.000 --> 0:08:15.520
<v Speaker 1>really happened here. I would just note that one of

0:08:15.560 --> 0:08:18.080
<v Speaker 1>the problems that you're gonna come up with is that

0:08:18.240 --> 0:08:22.040
<v Speaker 1>even if as crazy as this sounds, even if they

0:08:22.120 --> 0:08:26.120
<v Speaker 1>declassify more of this and you're able to see it,

0:08:26.160 --> 0:08:31.440
<v Speaker 1>even if Trump releases those fines the docs, they're gonna say, oh, well, okay,

0:08:31.480 --> 0:08:34.679
<v Speaker 1>the dossier might maybe was a bigger part of this

0:08:34.760 --> 0:08:38.200
<v Speaker 1>process than we initially thought. But the dossier I still

0:08:38.240 --> 0:08:41.920
<v Speaker 1>could be true. We're all we're gonna be swept up

0:08:41.920 --> 0:08:45.000
<v Speaker 1>in a could be, would be, could be true situation

0:08:45.720 --> 0:08:48.000
<v Speaker 1>very quickly we're gonna move away from the realm of

0:08:48.040 --> 0:08:51.880
<v Speaker 1>facts and logic and reason and into the depths of

0:08:51.920 --> 0:08:56.880
<v Speaker 1>Trump's arrangement syndrome. That's what's going to happen here. Uh,

0:08:56.920 --> 0:08:59.320
<v Speaker 1>speaking of Trump's arrangement syndrome, you know, you think that

0:08:59.559 --> 0:09:04.680
<v Speaker 1>in an era when what they call uh slut shaming,

0:09:05.520 --> 0:09:08.920
<v Speaker 1>for example, which is a term used by feminists on

0:09:08.960 --> 0:09:12.120
<v Speaker 1>the left to talk about any time a woman is

0:09:12.160 --> 0:09:15.839
<v Speaker 1>being demeaned for being too overt in her sexuality or

0:09:15.880 --> 0:09:19.600
<v Speaker 1>for her sex life, you think that federal prosecutors would

0:09:19.600 --> 0:09:25.000
<v Speaker 1>be a little bit more circumspect about such things, right,

0:09:25.000 --> 0:09:29.679
<v Speaker 1>given the possible public outcry. But Maria Boutina, who is

0:09:29.720 --> 0:09:32.320
<v Speaker 1>being held without bail, I would like to know. So

0:09:32.360 --> 0:09:35.320
<v Speaker 1>she's being held as though she were a Yes, I

0:09:35.360 --> 0:09:37.680
<v Speaker 1>know it's because she's a flight risk, but they're they're

0:09:37.760 --> 0:09:41.199
<v Speaker 1>holding or because they say that you know, she could

0:09:41.280 --> 0:09:44.640
<v Speaker 1>leave the country. Meanwhile, usually when you can't have bailiffs

0:09:44.640 --> 0:09:48.960
<v Speaker 1>because you either violated the terms of your bail or

0:09:49.000 --> 0:09:52.720
<v Speaker 1>your a risk to the public or a really serious

0:09:52.760 --> 0:09:56.920
<v Speaker 1>flight risk for a really serious crime. In this case,

0:09:57.040 --> 0:10:00.240
<v Speaker 1>her crimes are not registering as a foreign agent. Not

0:10:00.360 --> 0:10:03.440
<v Speaker 1>particularly serious stuff. Folks, generally you pay a fine for

0:10:03.520 --> 0:10:05.960
<v Speaker 1>that one. It's already been handed off. So it's not

0:10:06.000 --> 0:10:10.200
<v Speaker 1>the Mueller probe that's handling Maria Boutina. But prosecutors, you

0:10:10.240 --> 0:10:13.320
<v Speaker 1>may recall, put out the story. They put out the

0:10:13.360 --> 0:10:20.400
<v Speaker 1>story that Russian national Maria Boutina was exchanging sex, or

0:10:20.440 --> 0:10:25.000
<v Speaker 1>at least offered to exchange sex for access as part

0:10:25.160 --> 0:10:28.880
<v Speaker 1>of her political machinations. Right as part of her Russian

0:10:28.960 --> 0:10:34.200
<v Speaker 1>agent operations. She was a honeypot. Essentially, she she was

0:10:34.280 --> 0:10:37.600
<v Speaker 1>offering up sex to people who she thought could get

0:10:37.640 --> 0:10:43.360
<v Speaker 1>her access to important Republican American decision makers. And you'd

0:10:43.400 --> 0:10:45.560
<v Speaker 1>think that they would only go out with that kind

0:10:45.559 --> 0:10:50.920
<v Speaker 1>of character destroying information if it really really true. Turns out,

0:10:50.960 --> 0:10:54.319
<v Speaker 1>the prosecutors, now, folks, I'm not making this up. Terms

0:10:54.360 --> 0:10:58.679
<v Speaker 1>of the prosecutors have said, whoop see, looks like we

0:10:58.679 --> 0:11:02.319
<v Speaker 1>were wrong about that one. We misinterpreted a text message

0:11:02.440 --> 0:11:06.480
<v Speaker 1>chain and she really wasn't offering up sex to anybody.

0:11:06.520 --> 0:11:11.720
<v Speaker 1>She she really wasn't doing that. Oh okay, well, I'm

0:11:12.200 --> 0:11:15.640
<v Speaker 1>i gotta say so, so we've established that. Now, Uh,

0:11:15.720 --> 0:11:18.880
<v Speaker 1>that's not a little whoopsie. You'd think that this is

0:11:18.920 --> 0:11:23.599
<v Speaker 1>something prosecutors will be a little little slower in the

0:11:23.760 --> 0:11:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Russia judgment about at least to publicize it. It's one

0:11:26.280 --> 0:11:28.439
<v Speaker 1>thing to have it and hold it and release it

0:11:28.520 --> 0:11:33.360
<v Speaker 1>during trial. They made that part of the storyline when

0:11:33.400 --> 0:11:36.720
<v Speaker 1>she got arrested, and I think it's really interesting that

0:11:36.760 --> 0:11:38.960
<v Speaker 1>there's no outcry from the left about this at all,

0:11:39.880 --> 0:11:42.360
<v Speaker 1>that attacking this woman. Look, it's one thing to say

0:11:42.360 --> 0:11:46.000
<v Speaker 1>that she was doing Russian agent of influence operations in

0:11:46.000 --> 0:11:49.320
<v Speaker 1>the US. That's bad and we don't want that, although

0:11:49.360 --> 0:11:52.040
<v Speaker 1>how bad really depends on what she was doing. But

0:11:52.120 --> 0:11:54.760
<v Speaker 1>it's an entirely another thing. It's a very different kind

0:11:54.800 --> 0:11:57.160
<v Speaker 1>of crime to say that she was sleeping with people

0:11:57.280 --> 0:12:02.960
<v Speaker 1>as part of that process, and at prosecutors essentially slandered

0:12:03.000 --> 0:12:05.280
<v Speaker 1>her in this way and have admitted it. Just goes

0:12:05.360 --> 0:12:07.520
<v Speaker 1>to show you that there are no rules, folks, And

0:12:07.559 --> 0:12:09.280
<v Speaker 1>this is important for you to recognize. There are no

0:12:09.400 --> 0:12:14.320
<v Speaker 1>rules when it comes to dealing with anybody associated with

0:12:14.360 --> 0:12:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Trump or Russia collusion with Trump. As long as you

0:12:18.240 --> 0:12:21.440
<v Speaker 1>are hitting them and hitting them hard, as long as

0:12:21.480 --> 0:12:24.360
<v Speaker 1>you're hurting them with whatever you do, then it's all fine.

0:12:25.120 --> 0:12:27.400
<v Speaker 1>There will be no apology, I think, and the media

0:12:27.440 --> 0:12:29.400
<v Speaker 1>will not focus on this they will not turn Maria

0:12:29.440 --> 0:12:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Boutin into some kind of heroine. Um, but we should

0:12:33.040 --> 0:12:34.920
<v Speaker 1>at least take a moment to see the prosecutors are

0:12:34.960 --> 0:12:39.320
<v Speaker 1>over zealous and they are unfair when it comes to

0:12:39.400 --> 0:12:44.560
<v Speaker 1>prosecuting people around Trump that have anything to do with Russia.

0:12:45.200 --> 0:12:53.679
<v Speaker 1>Joseph Myth Sued, the professor who is tied to George

0:12:53.679 --> 0:13:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Papadopoulos is feared dead. Uh, this is this is bizarre, folks.

0:13:02.200 --> 0:13:04.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean this comes out here, this is from Fox News.

0:13:04.520 --> 0:13:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Joseph Mifsued, the mysterious Maltese professor believed to have played

0:13:08.640 --> 0:13:12.199
<v Speaker 1>a key role in igniting the Russia probe, vanished from

0:13:12.240 --> 0:13:16.200
<v Speaker 1>public eye after his name began surfacing in news stories. Now,

0:13:16.360 --> 0:13:19.400
<v Speaker 1>lawyers the Democratic National Committee say it is possible mif

0:13:19.520 --> 0:13:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Sued is dead. In filing the Southern District of New York,

0:13:23.520 --> 0:13:25.559
<v Speaker 1>the d n C said mith Sued is missing and

0:13:25.640 --> 0:13:29.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe deceased. The lawyers said that they will monitor new

0:13:29.080 --> 0:13:31.679
<v Speaker 1>sources for any indications of mess suits whereabouts and will

0:13:31.720 --> 0:13:34.840
<v Speaker 1>attempt service on myth suit if and when he has

0:13:34.840 --> 0:13:38.280
<v Speaker 1>found alive. Filing came as the DNC is suing Myth

0:13:38.360 --> 0:13:42.400
<v Speaker 1>Sued and others as part of its lawsuit accusing Trump

0:13:42.480 --> 0:13:45.280
<v Speaker 1>of conspiring with Russia in the election. I mean, what

0:13:45.600 --> 0:13:48.960
<v Speaker 1>you want to talk about a frivolous lawsuit? This is

0:13:49.040 --> 0:13:56.000
<v Speaker 1>this lawsuit is garbage, absolute garbage. Um. But now as

0:13:56.040 --> 0:13:57.959
<v Speaker 1>we as we look at this and try to get

0:13:58.000 --> 0:14:02.640
<v Speaker 1>a sense of what exactly the law, what exactly comes

0:14:02.640 --> 0:14:04.199
<v Speaker 1>into play here other than the fact of the d

0:14:04.320 --> 0:14:07.600
<v Speaker 1>n C is being litigious. You know, I am, I am.

0:14:07.600 --> 0:14:10.040
<v Speaker 1>I supposed to think that it's totally normal that this

0:14:10.080 --> 0:14:13.120
<v Speaker 1>guy who is at the very center of all this.

0:14:13.160 --> 0:14:15.559
<v Speaker 1>Remember if suit is the one who talked to Papadopolis

0:14:15.679 --> 0:14:19.960
<v Speaker 1>in London. He's the one who, uh it is believed

0:14:20.240 --> 0:14:24.360
<v Speaker 1>was perhaps run by a US either law enforcement or

0:14:24.400 --> 0:14:30.160
<v Speaker 1>intelligence service to get information from Papadopoulos. If he just

0:14:30.240 --> 0:14:34.560
<v Speaker 1>turns up randomly dead or rather in this case, just disappears,

0:14:36.000 --> 0:14:39.560
<v Speaker 1>are we supposed to think that that's entirely coincidence. We're

0:14:39.560 --> 0:14:42.920
<v Speaker 1>supposed to believe that this is just a thing that happened,

0:14:43.360 --> 0:14:45.520
<v Speaker 1>and that there's nothing that we need to see, there's

0:14:45.560 --> 0:14:50.040
<v Speaker 1>nothing that we should be concerned about. You know, it's

0:14:50.040 --> 0:14:55.760
<v Speaker 1>a coincidence. It's one giant, incredible coincidence. I have to say,

0:14:55.880 --> 0:15:00.440
<v Speaker 1>I find that very hard to believe. I find it

0:15:00.520 --> 0:15:03.160
<v Speaker 1>very hard to believe that this just happened, and there's

0:15:03.320 --> 0:15:06.240
<v Speaker 1>and and there's there's no reason to think of anything else,

0:15:07.480 --> 0:15:10.800
<v Speaker 1>just like I found it difficult to believe that the

0:15:11.040 --> 0:15:13.480
<v Speaker 1>op ed that came out, the anonymous op ed and

0:15:13.520 --> 0:15:16.920
<v Speaker 1>it's timing with the Bob Woodword book, was not the

0:15:17.000 --> 0:15:20.440
<v Speaker 1>result of what's obviously media collusion, and the media is

0:15:20.480 --> 0:15:23.400
<v Speaker 1>colluding together against Trump. I don't think there's really any

0:15:23.920 --> 0:15:26.600
<v Speaker 1>serious debate about that. I think that that's been on

0:15:26.640 --> 0:15:29.440
<v Speaker 1>display for a long time. But but the timing of

0:15:29.480 --> 0:15:32.120
<v Speaker 1>these things happens, and we're supposed to believe, Yeah, you know,

0:15:32.200 --> 0:15:34.600
<v Speaker 1>it's it's not a big deal. You know, this this

0:15:34.640 --> 0:15:37.760
<v Speaker 1>stuff just sort of happens. We need to just deal

0:15:37.800 --> 0:15:43.040
<v Speaker 1>with the reality of unforeseen events that that that occur

0:15:43.240 --> 0:15:46.480
<v Speaker 1>at these incredibly inopportune times for Trump. But if you

0:15:46.600 --> 0:15:50.520
<v Speaker 1>if you despise Trump, all of a sudden, the timing

0:15:50.600 --> 0:15:53.480
<v Speaker 1>is amazing and you seem quite it seems quite lucky.

0:15:54.160 --> 0:15:56.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, Woodword is out there saying that people better

0:15:56.160 --> 0:15:59.360
<v Speaker 1>wake up to what's going on. I've got to say,

0:15:59.400 --> 0:16:02.520
<v Speaker 1>I I don't know what Woodward thinks is really all

0:16:02.560 --> 0:16:05.480
<v Speaker 1>that different in his book. We we've read so much

0:16:05.520 --> 0:16:08.280
<v Speaker 1>of this already. We we've heard this, we've seen this,

0:16:08.440 --> 0:16:13.320
<v Speaker 1>we are very much aware. Uh. And yet Woodward is

0:16:13.360 --> 0:16:17.440
<v Speaker 1>holding himself up yet again as the hero in this

0:16:17.560 --> 0:16:20.960
<v Speaker 1>narrative and literally his narrative of course, right or by

0:16:21.000 --> 0:16:27.920
<v Speaker 1>constructing this narrative of telling us that Trump is incredibly

0:16:28.400 --> 0:16:32.560
<v Speaker 1>um incompetent. And you know, we we've heard all this

0:16:32.640 --> 0:16:35.440
<v Speaker 1>before though there's nothing really all that new in this information.

0:16:35.600 --> 0:16:39.000
<v Speaker 1>I asked Alma Rosa last week. She said Trump is crazy.

0:16:39.040 --> 0:16:41.200
<v Speaker 1>I said, tell me, how, tell me why? She Well,

0:16:42.040 --> 0:16:44.880
<v Speaker 1>I can't give you any specifics on anything. I can't

0:16:44.880 --> 0:16:47.760
<v Speaker 1>actually bring you up to speed on why Trump is

0:16:47.760 --> 0:16:50.560
<v Speaker 1>crazy other than to make the allegation the accusation. I'm

0:16:50.600 --> 0:16:53.760
<v Speaker 1>starting to feel like, folks, if a crazy president can

0:16:53.800 --> 0:16:57.080
<v Speaker 1>be this successful, maybe we need a crazy president. You know,

0:16:57.280 --> 0:16:58.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe we're in a different kind of world than we

0:16:59.000 --> 0:17:02.400
<v Speaker 1>think we were, where not everyone has to pretend to

0:17:02.400 --> 0:17:05.480
<v Speaker 1>be a character in the West Wing with pithy comebacks

0:17:05.520 --> 0:17:09.080
<v Speaker 1>and always talking about you know, freedom and democracy and

0:17:09.080 --> 0:17:12.200
<v Speaker 1>and and America and values and all that stuff. I mean,

0:17:12.520 --> 0:17:15.200
<v Speaker 1>you want somebody who believes in that, but you want

0:17:15.240 --> 0:17:19.000
<v Speaker 1>them to protect those things to propagate those things. You

0:17:19.040 --> 0:17:22.240
<v Speaker 1>don't want them to just sit around and make a

0:17:22.280 --> 0:17:24.680
<v Speaker 1>show of it. That's why I just don't think the

0:17:24.680 --> 0:17:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Woodword Book has the punch that he obviously wants it to.

0:17:28.920 --> 0:17:31.800
<v Speaker 1>When you look at it more closely, it's now keep

0:17:31.800 --> 0:17:33.320
<v Speaker 1>in mind, I've only seen excerpts of it. I know

0:17:33.359 --> 0:17:34.560
<v Speaker 1>he like, what do even when you look at it,

0:17:34.560 --> 0:17:37.840
<v Speaker 1>I have not. I have not been damed. So important

0:17:37.920 --> 0:17:40.639
<v Speaker 1>and uh and so fantastic has to be given a

0:17:40.680 --> 0:17:43.520
<v Speaker 1>copy of the Woodward Book up front. But I have

0:17:43.560 --> 0:17:46.280
<v Speaker 1>to say, when you look at this thing, you find

0:17:46.320 --> 0:17:50.200
<v Speaker 1>that or the whole narrative around it too. It's clear

0:17:50.240 --> 0:17:53.480
<v Speaker 1>to me that this is just a repetition of what's

0:17:53.480 --> 0:17:58.080
<v Speaker 1>already been out there, consolidated under one by line Woodward

0:17:58.160 --> 0:18:02.400
<v Speaker 1>and right after the hunt for a non September had

0:18:02.440 --> 0:18:06.320
<v Speaker 1>to start. These things all coincide, folks, They all come together.

0:18:06.920 --> 0:18:08.760
<v Speaker 1>And when you add into that miff suit is now

0:18:08.840 --> 0:18:12.720
<v Speaker 1>dropping off the radar, perhaps forever. Right when this probe

0:18:12.720 --> 0:18:18.119
<v Speaker 1>should end, I've got questions, big ones. Let's turn to

0:18:18.160 --> 0:18:21.320
<v Speaker 1>the world of sports for a minute. Chilley, social justice

0:18:22.000 --> 0:18:24.920
<v Speaker 1>once again the order of the day. Apparently we'll get

0:18:24.920 --> 0:18:28.680
<v Speaker 1>into that. Here's how it all started. This is Serena

0:18:28.720 --> 0:18:33.639
<v Speaker 1>Williams right after losing in the US Open Women's tennis final.

0:18:34.640 --> 0:18:37.200
<v Speaker 1>We can never really go back to Serena, but if

0:18:37.200 --> 0:18:41.000
<v Speaker 1>you could change one complin about what occurred, what would

0:18:41.000 --> 0:18:45.919
<v Speaker 1>that be? Um, I don't know. I don't You definitely

0:18:45.960 --> 0:18:48.720
<v Speaker 1>can't go back in time. But I can't sit here

0:18:48.720 --> 0:18:51.680
<v Speaker 1>and say I wouldn't say he's a thief because he

0:18:51.880 --> 0:18:53.680
<v Speaker 1>I thought he took a game from me. But I've

0:18:53.720 --> 0:18:59.120
<v Speaker 1>seen other men call other umpires several things. And I'm

0:18:59.160 --> 0:19:03.200
<v Speaker 1>here fighting for women's rights and for women's equality and

0:19:03.280 --> 0:19:05.359
<v Speaker 1>for all kinds of stuff. And for me to say

0:19:05.720 --> 0:19:08.320
<v Speaker 1>thief and for him to take a game, it made

0:19:08.320 --> 0:19:10.480
<v Speaker 1>me feel like it was a sexist remark. I mean,

0:19:10.520 --> 0:19:13.399
<v Speaker 1>like how he's never took a game from a man

0:19:13.480 --> 0:19:18.160
<v Speaker 1>because they said fief. For me, it blows my mind.

0:19:18.400 --> 0:19:22.200
<v Speaker 1>But I'm going to continue to to fight for women

0:19:22.280 --> 0:19:25.399
<v Speaker 1>and to fight for us to have equal like coordination,

0:19:25.400 --> 0:19:27.240
<v Speaker 1>should be able to take our shirt off without getting

0:19:27.720 --> 0:19:31.639
<v Speaker 1>a fine Like this is outrageous, you know, And I

0:19:31.760 --> 0:19:34.320
<v Speaker 1>just feel like the fact that I have to go

0:19:34.400 --> 0:19:36.600
<v Speaker 1>through this is just an example for the next person

0:19:37.400 --> 0:19:39.920
<v Speaker 1>that has emotions and that want to express themselves and

0:19:39.960 --> 0:19:42.040
<v Speaker 1>they want to be a strong woman, and they're gonna

0:19:42.080 --> 0:19:44.119
<v Speaker 1>be allowed to do that because of today. Maybe it

0:19:44.119 --> 0:19:45.760
<v Speaker 1>didn't work out for me, but it's gonna work out

0:19:45.760 --> 0:19:55.880
<v Speaker 1>for the next person. Everyone. Wow, Serena Williams, women's rights hero. Apparently,

0:19:56.119 --> 0:19:58.040
<v Speaker 1>let me just take a step back for a woman, folks,

0:19:58.040 --> 0:20:00.800
<v Speaker 1>and we can describe exactly what happened here, and then

0:20:00.840 --> 0:20:02.480
<v Speaker 1>you can come to your own conclusions about whether or

0:20:02.520 --> 0:20:06.480
<v Speaker 1>not you think this was, as advertised, a case of

0:20:06.840 --> 0:20:10.159
<v Speaker 1>standing up for women's rights and and paving the pathway

0:20:10.240 --> 0:20:12.600
<v Speaker 1>for the next young woman who comes along so that

0:20:12.960 --> 0:20:17.320
<v Speaker 1>she doesn't have to deal with this degree of of sexism. Uh.

0:20:17.400 --> 0:20:20.399
<v Speaker 1>Serena Wims in the US Open final against a woman

0:20:20.480 --> 0:20:25.240
<v Speaker 1>by the last name of Osaka. I'm actually blanking temporarily

0:20:25.560 --> 0:20:28.080
<v Speaker 1>on her first name. I'm looking it up right this second.

0:20:28.160 --> 0:20:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Pardon me, that happened sometimes when you're on air, Um, Naiomi,

0:20:33.800 --> 0:20:37.840
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna say, Natalie Naomi Osaka. So look, I

0:20:37.920 --> 0:20:39.600
<v Speaker 1>like tennis a lot. For those of you who don't

0:20:39.640 --> 0:20:43.000
<v Speaker 1>know that, I'm some some lot of a tennis fan. Um,

0:20:43.040 --> 0:20:45.439
<v Speaker 1>but I don't like that all sports now have been

0:20:45.480 --> 0:20:49.200
<v Speaker 1>polluted by social justice. It's not just the NFL, and

0:20:49.240 --> 0:20:51.760
<v Speaker 1>I would note by the way that this past weekend

0:20:52.359 --> 0:20:56.480
<v Speaker 1>with the NFL kneeling that occurred, it's essentially no longer

0:20:56.520 --> 0:20:59.800
<v Speaker 1>a problem, folks. I think you had two out of

0:21:00.480 --> 0:21:04.080
<v Speaker 1>almost a thousand players take a knee of to Miami

0:21:04.160 --> 0:21:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Dolphins players, So this is now irrelevant. This is not

0:21:07.680 --> 0:21:09.800
<v Speaker 1>a big problem in the NFL. People are not doing it,

0:21:10.000 --> 0:21:12.600
<v Speaker 1>and I don't even think the President should focus on

0:21:12.600 --> 0:21:15.000
<v Speaker 1>it anymore because he's giving too much attention to one

0:21:15.080 --> 0:21:17.760
<v Speaker 1>or two guys. Nobody really cares about what they're doing.

0:21:19.000 --> 0:21:24.080
<v Speaker 1>But social justice ideology has penetrated far beyond any one

0:21:24.160 --> 0:21:28.240
<v Speaker 1>particular sport, and in this case in tennis, you have

0:21:28.320 --> 0:21:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Serena Williams, who is obviously African American female, who is

0:21:33.160 --> 0:21:36.560
<v Speaker 1>in terms of wins and just in terms of raw ability,

0:21:36.840 --> 0:21:40.240
<v Speaker 1>the greatest female tennis player of all time. Some people

0:21:40.320 --> 0:21:42.680
<v Speaker 1>would put one or two other names in there. She's

0:21:42.720 --> 0:21:45.239
<v Speaker 1>certainly in the top three of all time, if not

0:21:45.359 --> 0:21:48.240
<v Speaker 1>number one, far and away. So she's had a tremendous

0:21:48.280 --> 0:21:51.199
<v Speaker 1>amount of success. She's worth probably well north of a

0:21:51.240 --> 0:21:53.280
<v Speaker 1>hundred million dollars. I don't know what her net worth Is,

0:21:53.320 --> 0:21:56.720
<v Speaker 1>but she's she's fabulously wealthy, she has a clothing line,

0:21:56.840 --> 0:22:01.600
<v Speaker 1>she's an international superstar. But she also has had a

0:22:01.640 --> 0:22:05.400
<v Speaker 1>few instances in the past where she has lost her cool.

0:22:05.480 --> 0:22:09.960
<v Speaker 1>She's lost her temper very obviously and markedly in the past.

0:22:10.520 --> 0:22:14.040
<v Speaker 1>And this instance here, this time, we're talking about the

0:22:14.119 --> 0:22:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Over the weekend the u S Open, she decided that well,

0:22:19.200 --> 0:22:23.159
<v Speaker 1>she was getting coached, which is a violation. Her coach

0:22:23.280 --> 0:22:25.240
<v Speaker 1>gave some hand signals, and I would note that while

0:22:25.320 --> 0:22:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Serena said, oh I wasn't getting coached, it doesn't matter

0:22:29.040 --> 0:22:31.480
<v Speaker 1>whether she saw him or not. The coach was trying

0:22:31.520 --> 0:22:34.119
<v Speaker 1>to give her coaching signals with his hands. Whether you

0:22:34.119 --> 0:22:36.679
<v Speaker 1>should be allowed to do that or not is another discussion,

0:22:36.800 --> 0:22:39.040
<v Speaker 1>but you're not allowed to do it. In tennis, she

0:22:39.200 --> 0:22:42.440
<v Speaker 1>got a warning for that. She then after losing a point,

0:22:42.480 --> 0:22:46.119
<v Speaker 1>and she was already losing to Naomi Osaka pretty badly.

0:22:46.240 --> 0:22:49.080
<v Speaker 1>And it's not reported enough that Osaka already beat her

0:22:49.119 --> 0:22:52.520
<v Speaker 1>earlier this year. So it's not like Osaka can't go

0:22:52.600 --> 0:22:55.960
<v Speaker 1>pound for pound, you know, stroke for stroke against william

0:22:56.040 --> 0:22:58.080
<v Speaker 1>She she has and she has won in the past,

0:22:59.119 --> 0:23:02.280
<v Speaker 1>but Williams just took her racket and annihilated it. I

0:23:02.280 --> 0:23:05.879
<v Speaker 1>mean just shattered it on on the court, which people

0:23:05.880 --> 0:23:09.159
<v Speaker 1>will say, one, it is poor sportsmanship, but also that

0:23:09.200 --> 0:23:11.919
<v Speaker 1>little plastic can fly up and and actually, you know,

0:23:12.280 --> 0:23:14.840
<v Speaker 1>strike somebody in the front row. I mean, you really

0:23:14.880 --> 0:23:17.280
<v Speaker 1>don't want to set a precedent where you can just

0:23:17.280 --> 0:23:19.800
<v Speaker 1>start breaking things on the court. So she got a

0:23:19.920 --> 0:23:23.840
<v Speaker 1>point penalty, but Serena didn't stop there. Then she decided

0:23:23.880 --> 0:23:26.720
<v Speaker 1>that she was going to make this an issue of

0:23:26.720 --> 0:23:31.960
<v Speaker 1>of her honor, and she started arguing vociferously with the

0:23:32.080 --> 0:23:34.879
<v Speaker 1>chair umpire of this match. Understand why you may have

0:23:34.920 --> 0:23:37.199
<v Speaker 1>thought out that was coaching, and I'm telling you it's not.

0:23:37.240 --> 0:23:39.399
<v Speaker 1>I don't cheat to win a brother, Lucas. I'm just

0:23:39.480 --> 0:23:42.520
<v Speaker 1>letting you know he's a coaching violation, and I guess

0:23:42.520 --> 0:23:45.000
<v Speaker 1>he's a thumbs up in Serena setting you straight that

0:23:45.000 --> 0:23:48.920
<v Speaker 1>that is not coaching. I don't cheat, Salna. I'd rather lose,

0:23:49.119 --> 0:23:54.480
<v Speaker 1>she says. Now, I think it's funny that that announcer

0:23:54.520 --> 0:23:58.080
<v Speaker 1>says sets sets the umpire straight. She was wrong. The

0:23:58.240 --> 0:24:01.320
<v Speaker 1>coach later admitted that he was coaching, which is again

0:24:01.400 --> 0:24:03.800
<v Speaker 1>not a huge deal. It happens coaches get a little

0:24:03.800 --> 0:24:06.520
<v Speaker 1>animated there in the stands, and they really want their

0:24:06.560 --> 0:24:09.680
<v Speaker 1>player to win. But she was wrong. He was trying

0:24:09.720 --> 0:24:12.159
<v Speaker 1>to coach her and she acted like he wasn't and

0:24:12.200 --> 0:24:15.719
<v Speaker 1>that she didn't or maybe was only slightly able to

0:24:15.760 --> 0:24:18.679
<v Speaker 1>see what he was doing, does not change the violation.

0:24:19.119 --> 0:24:22.080
<v Speaker 1>This is straightforward stuff, folks. She broke the rules. She

0:24:22.200 --> 0:24:24.040
<v Speaker 1>broke the rules, and then she couldn't accept that she

0:24:24.080 --> 0:24:26.760
<v Speaker 1>broke the rules, and then she got really nasty with

0:24:26.880 --> 0:24:35.360
<v Speaker 1>the umpire. Yeah, that's the morning. I didn't get coaching.

0:24:35.520 --> 0:24:39.120
<v Speaker 1>I didn't get coaching. I didn't get coaching. You need

0:24:39.160 --> 0:24:40.879
<v Speaker 1>to take you need to make an announcement that I

0:24:40.920 --> 0:24:44.160
<v Speaker 1>didn't get coaching. I don't cheat, I didn't get coaching.

0:24:44.280 --> 0:24:50.560
<v Speaker 1>I didn't say that. No need you need. You don't

0:24:50.560 --> 0:24:53.880
<v Speaker 1>get a policy. You owe me a politic. I haven't

0:24:53.920 --> 0:24:56.399
<v Speaker 1>averaging it in my life. I have a daughter, and

0:24:56.440 --> 0:25:06.440
<v Speaker 1>I stand. Was my hard i've ever seen. He was up. Yeah,

0:25:09.640 --> 0:25:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Serena was watching her coach give her handsome. I don't

0:25:13.520 --> 0:25:14.960
<v Speaker 1>know if you caught that part at the very end,

0:25:15.000 --> 0:25:18.560
<v Speaker 1>but she called the umpire a thief, which, as you

0:25:18.600 --> 0:25:23.520
<v Speaker 1>can imagine, the umpire did not particularly like. That annoyed

0:25:23.920 --> 0:25:26.800
<v Speaker 1>the umpire and so the umpire because it's a third

0:25:27.359 --> 0:25:29.080
<v Speaker 1>and there was sort of a back and forth. You

0:25:29.119 --> 0:25:32.240
<v Speaker 1>can't really hear the umpire uh speaking there, but she

0:25:32.280 --> 0:25:36.320
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't stop, and she's really being belligerent with the chair

0:25:36.400 --> 0:25:38.960
<v Speaker 1>umpire not allowed to do this. Tennis, like golf, is

0:25:39.000 --> 0:25:42.159
<v Speaker 1>a game that still takes its decorum pretty seriously. So

0:25:42.200 --> 0:25:45.080
<v Speaker 1>she got a game penalty and then later she lost,

0:25:45.240 --> 0:25:48.200
<v Speaker 1>and the whole thing is just so. And by the way, folks,

0:25:48.320 --> 0:25:50.160
<v Speaker 1>I know, if you don't care about tennis, this isn't

0:25:50.200 --> 0:25:52.480
<v Speaker 1>about tennis, okay, it's about the narrative around it, which

0:25:52.480 --> 0:25:54.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna get to in just a second, but you

0:25:54.520 --> 0:25:57.520
<v Speaker 1>need to know the full facts. Then Osaka goes up

0:25:57.560 --> 0:26:00.320
<v Speaker 1>on stage and she just should be the greatest moment

0:26:00.320 --> 0:26:03.879
<v Speaker 1>of her career. She's one of her three million dollars. Okay,

0:26:04.040 --> 0:26:05.480
<v Speaker 1>so look, it is a good day no matter what.

0:26:05.520 --> 0:26:08.560
<v Speaker 1>But she one of her three million dollars. She beat

0:26:08.640 --> 0:26:12.399
<v Speaker 1>her idol, Serena Williams. She even said that on the

0:26:12.480 --> 0:26:15.840
<v Speaker 1>number one stage really for at least American players in

0:26:15.840 --> 0:26:18.280
<v Speaker 1>the world. For a lot of people say it's number

0:26:18.280 --> 0:26:21.399
<v Speaker 1>one of the Wimbledon's up there too, And it was

0:26:22.480 --> 0:26:24.960
<v Speaker 1>a disgusting scene. A lot of people were booing. Now

0:26:25.000 --> 0:26:27.720
<v Speaker 1>I know they're booing the U. S t A. Or

0:26:27.720 --> 0:26:30.879
<v Speaker 1>they're booing the officials, really, but to Osaka, she's up

0:26:30.880 --> 0:26:32.879
<v Speaker 1>there and she's hearing booing from the crowd. It was

0:26:32.920 --> 0:26:36.280
<v Speaker 1>just horrible. But what was amazing, folks, was how quickly

0:26:36.440 --> 0:26:39.680
<v Speaker 1>all of these different sports announcers and the United States

0:26:39.720 --> 0:26:44.399
<v Speaker 1>Tennis Association rallied around Serena all of a sudden, Serena

0:26:44.520 --> 0:26:47.240
<v Speaker 1>is a women's rights hero. How is she women's rights hero?

0:26:47.800 --> 0:26:52.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm seeing people sharing stuff from thirty years ago, John

0:26:52.080 --> 0:26:54.400
<v Speaker 1>McEnroe acting like an idiot, which he used to do,

0:26:54.480 --> 0:26:56.400
<v Speaker 1>and he used to get penalized too for that. By

0:26:56.440 --> 0:26:59.040
<v Speaker 1>the way, perhaps not enough. You should have been ejected

0:26:59.080 --> 0:27:05.000
<v Speaker 1>from games. But she broke the rules, and yet here

0:27:05.000 --> 0:27:09.080
<v Speaker 1>we are watching as she breaks the rules and then

0:27:09.320 --> 0:27:13.600
<v Speaker 1>is applauded for being some kind of hero for women's

0:27:13.680 --> 0:27:16.240
<v Speaker 1>rights and equality. I mean the stuff that she was

0:27:16.280 --> 0:27:19.520
<v Speaker 1>saying in there, that it was a sexist remark, she

0:27:19.600 --> 0:27:22.399
<v Speaker 1>called the umpire a thief. She's being disrespectful. You're not

0:27:22.400 --> 0:27:25.840
<v Speaker 1>allowed to do that. Now, why do you have otherwise

0:27:26.200 --> 0:27:30.639
<v Speaker 1>savvy's sports watchers and announcers and commentators at least savvy

0:27:30.680 --> 0:27:34.480
<v Speaker 1>about their sport. Why do they all rush to Serena side? Well, folks,

0:27:34.560 --> 0:27:36.600
<v Speaker 1>for a long time, there has been this narrative that

0:27:36.600 --> 0:27:41.479
<v Speaker 1>because Serena is black, there are double standards that are

0:27:41.480 --> 0:27:43.399
<v Speaker 1>applied to her, as well as the fact that she

0:27:43.520 --> 0:27:46.119
<v Speaker 1>is a female, which is the case here. For a

0:27:46.160 --> 0:27:48.840
<v Speaker 1>long time, though, there have been people that talked about

0:27:48.960 --> 0:27:52.280
<v Speaker 1>racism and the inherent racism of either a you know,

0:27:52.720 --> 0:27:56.399
<v Speaker 1>a bad refing situation, or just how tennis was an

0:27:56.400 --> 0:27:59.840
<v Speaker 1>elitist sport, although you know, tennis now is a truly

0:28:00.000 --> 0:28:02.960
<v Speaker 1>global sport. But you can just see that all these

0:28:02.960 --> 0:28:05.720
<v Speaker 1>people see Serena Williams and they see her situation, they

0:28:05.720 --> 0:28:11.359
<v Speaker 1>think to themselves, female black sports icon, not what really

0:28:11.359 --> 0:28:13.960
<v Speaker 1>happened here? And what's the circumstance, because there's not There's

0:28:13.960 --> 0:28:17.440
<v Speaker 1>not two ways about this. But to announcers, they want

0:28:17.440 --> 0:28:19.000
<v Speaker 1>to be politically correct, they want to be on the

0:28:19.080 --> 0:28:22.359
<v Speaker 1>right side of this, and the social justice left they

0:28:22.400 --> 0:28:24.560
<v Speaker 1>see this as an opportunity, as a as a kind

0:28:24.560 --> 0:28:28.640
<v Speaker 1>of Kaepernick like moment, a rallying cry for women's equality.

0:28:28.760 --> 0:28:32.639
<v Speaker 1>I I don't know, it's such a stretch, it's really laughable.

0:28:33.600 --> 0:28:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Her thing about women are a woman who took off

0:28:35.840 --> 0:28:38.240
<v Speaker 1>her shirt. By the way, yes, there's a different set

0:28:38.240 --> 0:28:41.040
<v Speaker 1>of rules for women than men. Women also have boobs

0:28:41.120 --> 0:28:43.720
<v Speaker 1>and men don't. And I know that we're supposed to

0:28:43.720 --> 0:28:47.160
<v Speaker 1>move past gender roles entirely in society, but we still

0:28:47.200 --> 0:28:50.800
<v Speaker 1>think of boobs as things that and maybe we shouldn't, folks,

0:28:50.800 --> 0:28:52.680
<v Speaker 1>maybe we should get past it. You know, I'm fine

0:28:52.680 --> 0:28:55.240
<v Speaker 1>with boobs, but we think of them as something that

0:28:55.480 --> 0:28:57.520
<v Speaker 1>you shouldn't see in the open. Although New York you

0:28:57.520 --> 0:28:59.560
<v Speaker 1>can actually walk around topless. It's the law. You can

0:28:59.600 --> 0:29:01.800
<v Speaker 1>walk around ooplace in downtown Manhattan. You won't get arrested,

0:29:03.120 --> 0:29:05.120
<v Speaker 1>but it is the rule. And it's because you think

0:29:05.160 --> 0:29:07.600
<v Speaker 1>of men and women differently because they are different. So

0:29:07.760 --> 0:29:09.480
<v Speaker 1>a woman taking off her shirt, if she has a

0:29:09.520 --> 0:29:12.720
<v Speaker 1>sports brawl underneath, I'm fine with it. But the rules

0:29:12.800 --> 0:29:17.080
<v Speaker 1>aren't there to penalize women Unkindly. It's just because women

0:29:17.120 --> 0:29:19.920
<v Speaker 1>have you know, what are considered sex organs up top

0:29:19.960 --> 0:29:23.120
<v Speaker 1>and men don't. Uh, And maybe maybe society is wrong

0:29:23.160 --> 0:29:26.160
<v Speaker 1>with that, but it's not like Tennis is some terrible

0:29:26.920 --> 0:29:31.600
<v Speaker 1>anti women, misogynist organization that's trying to penalize ladies for

0:29:31.600 --> 0:29:34.800
<v Speaker 1>for having boobs um and then just her whole thing

0:29:34.800 --> 0:29:36.560
<v Speaker 1>about how she would you know, it's about her daughter

0:29:36.640 --> 0:29:38.360
<v Speaker 1>and she would never cheat. Let me tell you some

0:29:38.400 --> 0:29:41.040
<v Speaker 1>about Serena Williams in two thousand and nine against another

0:29:41.200 --> 0:29:45.040
<v Speaker 1>player called Kim Clyst named Clim Cloisters. I believe Belgian

0:29:45.720 --> 0:29:49.280
<v Speaker 1>um she or was it Kim Cloisters, Yes, it was

0:29:49.320 --> 0:29:54.040
<v Speaker 1>it was Kim Clysters. Uh. She didn't like a foot

0:29:54.080 --> 0:29:56.480
<v Speaker 1>fall call that she got, and she walked over and

0:29:56.520 --> 0:29:58.840
<v Speaker 1>this was on camera and everybody heard and saw this,

0:29:59.280 --> 0:30:05.080
<v Speaker 1>and she threatened a small, uh female Asian American line judge.

0:30:05.320 --> 0:30:10.120
<v Speaker 1>She said she would take an effing ball and slam

0:30:10.120 --> 0:30:13.280
<v Speaker 1>it down her effing throat. And now this is the

0:30:13.280 --> 0:30:16.720
<v Speaker 1>the most iconic female tennis player in the world threatening

0:30:16.720 --> 0:30:19.320
<v Speaker 1>a line judge because she didn't like a call. All right,

0:30:19.640 --> 0:30:22.720
<v Speaker 1>I can't tell you any other prominent female tennis player,

0:30:23.160 --> 0:30:26.720
<v Speaker 1>or honestly, any other prominent prominent female athlete who has

0:30:26.760 --> 0:30:30.560
<v Speaker 1>done something quite as aggressive and egregious as that. But

0:30:30.600 --> 0:30:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Serena has a victim complex, folks. She thinks of herself

0:30:34.680 --> 0:30:38.320
<v Speaker 1>even though she's a just like Kaepernick, even though she's

0:30:38.360 --> 0:30:43.160
<v Speaker 1>a globally recognizable brand, and even though she's worth millions,

0:30:43.240 --> 0:30:45.240
<v Speaker 1>she's a lot more famous, a lot more successful as

0:30:45.240 --> 0:30:47.960
<v Speaker 1>an athlete than Kaepernick ever was. But she's worth millions

0:30:47.960 --> 0:30:51.440
<v Speaker 1>and millions of dollars. She thinks that she's treated unfairly

0:30:52.000 --> 0:30:54.840
<v Speaker 1>and that her race and her gender hold her back,

0:30:55.360 --> 0:30:59.240
<v Speaker 1>and therefore justifies, you know, she says there's a different standard,

0:30:59.280 --> 0:31:02.400
<v Speaker 1>and therefore wants there to be a different standard under

0:31:02.400 --> 0:31:06.280
<v Speaker 1>which we would judge her in actions and situations like this.

0:31:07.040 --> 0:31:10.040
<v Speaker 1>That's what you see really happening, and and the political

0:31:10.120 --> 0:31:11.680
<v Speaker 1>correctness around it all is why you had all these

0:31:11.720 --> 0:31:15.520
<v Speaker 1>announcers acting like idiots and coming to the defense of

0:31:15.560 --> 0:31:19.360
<v Speaker 1>an athlete who's who is a bully. Sometimes she's a bully.

0:31:19.480 --> 0:31:24.280
<v Speaker 1>That's what happens. And she ruined Naomi Osaka's big moment

0:31:25.000 --> 0:31:28.200
<v Speaker 1>because she's not a big enough person to see pass that.

0:31:28.240 --> 0:31:29.840
<v Speaker 1>She was already getting her butt kicked in the game

0:31:29.880 --> 0:31:31.720
<v Speaker 1>by the way she was. She was losing the match,

0:31:31.800 --> 0:31:35.160
<v Speaker 1>no question about it. But now she wanted an asterisk

0:31:35.280 --> 0:31:37.680
<v Speaker 1>next to it. She wanted there to be uh, you know, well,

0:31:37.680 --> 0:31:40.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe I didn't really lose and show she threw a tantrum,

0:31:40.160 --> 0:31:42.600
<v Speaker 1>and that's what it was. A tantrum. I don't care

0:31:42.680 --> 0:31:45.360
<v Speaker 1>what gender you are. I don't care what color you are.

0:31:45.640 --> 0:31:48.440
<v Speaker 1>When you throw a tantrum in a situation like that

0:31:48.480 --> 0:31:50.800
<v Speaker 1>and you break the rules, you should be held accountable

0:31:51.160 --> 0:31:53.320
<v Speaker 1>because you see, I respect men and women equally, and

0:31:53.360 --> 0:31:56.360
<v Speaker 1>I respect all races equally. So therefore I apply the

0:31:56.440 --> 0:32:00.640
<v Speaker 1>same logic and standards and code of conduct to every buddy.

0:32:00.840 --> 0:32:04.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't change it based upon the allegations that in

0:32:04.320 --> 0:32:08.800
<v Speaker 1>other situations it has been changed against that person. That's

0:32:08.800 --> 0:32:12.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna try to rebalance the past based upon

0:32:12.560 --> 0:32:17.479
<v Speaker 1>somebody's claims. So anyway, that's what I just social justice

0:32:17.520 --> 0:32:20.120
<v Speaker 1>now affects everything, and it affects even the way we

0:32:20.160 --> 0:32:23.440
<v Speaker 1>talk about a tennis incident like this. Speaking of social justice,

0:32:23.560 --> 0:32:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Jim Carrey is out there talking about how he wants socialism,

0:32:28.840 --> 0:32:30.720
<v Speaker 1>but not when it comes to his money. I'm sure

0:32:30.800 --> 0:32:34.640
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to yours, we'll get there. Stay with me, boys,

0:32:34.680 --> 0:32:36.800
<v Speaker 1>I've always said that the United States has been a

0:32:36.880 --> 0:32:40.600
<v Speaker 1>quasi socialist government for a hundred years. For crying out loud,

0:32:40.680 --> 0:32:44.320
<v Speaker 1>it's not. I'm plenty of subsidies for oil company, also

0:32:44.400 --> 0:32:47.880
<v Speaker 1>medicare and socialticularity, and yes, of course, there's nothing more

0:32:47.960 --> 0:32:51.120
<v Speaker 1>socialistic than some of the Pentagon programs that are just

0:32:51.240 --> 0:32:54.360
<v Speaker 1>jobs programs. The Pentagon says we don't want these tanks,

0:32:54.360 --> 0:32:56.600
<v Speaker 1>and they've build them. Anyway. If that's not socialism, I

0:32:56.640 --> 0:33:00.480
<v Speaker 1>don't know what it is. But but that word, the

0:33:00.520 --> 0:33:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Democrats seem to get a plan to fight this, this

0:33:04.360 --> 0:33:07.480
<v Speaker 1>slander of socialism. You're gonna be living in Venezuela. I

0:33:07.520 --> 0:33:11.200
<v Speaker 1>don't we have to say socialism to the word and everything.

0:33:11.680 --> 0:33:14.400
<v Speaker 1>We have to stop a pot I am, that's right.

0:33:14.440 --> 0:33:17.320
<v Speaker 1>We have to say yes to socialism. Say if the

0:33:17.800 --> 0:33:21.280
<v Speaker 1>hundred million dollar man, Jim Carey, we have to say

0:33:21.440 --> 0:33:24.760
<v Speaker 1>yes to the massive redistribution of wealth. But I don't

0:33:24.760 --> 0:33:27.400
<v Speaker 1>know if that means that Jim Carey has to give

0:33:27.520 --> 0:33:32.680
<v Speaker 1>up his Malibu mansion. You know, you have to wonder, folks.

0:33:32.880 --> 0:33:36.120
<v Speaker 1>They're now saying this is the bill Marline. Oh well,

0:33:36.160 --> 0:33:39.520
<v Speaker 1>we're basically already a socialist country. Okay, Well, in that case,

0:33:39.640 --> 0:33:41.880
<v Speaker 1>what are these major changes that they say need to

0:33:41.920 --> 0:33:46.840
<v Speaker 1>happen under this banner of socialism that's being trotted out

0:33:46.960 --> 0:33:51.480
<v Speaker 1>by prominent Democrats on a regular basis. When they say, oh, well,

0:33:51.560 --> 0:33:53.520
<v Speaker 1>we don't we're not gonna end up like Venezuela, or

0:33:53.600 --> 0:33:56.080
<v Speaker 1>it's not fair to say we'll end up like Venezuela. Okay, Well,

0:33:56.120 --> 0:33:58.440
<v Speaker 1>for us to end up like Sweden, which is the

0:33:58.480 --> 0:34:00.800
<v Speaker 1>other thing that they talk about, we are going to

0:34:00.960 --> 0:34:05.760
<v Speaker 1>have to have tax rates in the area of say

0:34:05.760 --> 0:34:09.400
<v Speaker 1>fifty for the middle class, for you, for me, for

0:34:09.480 --> 0:34:12.080
<v Speaker 1>people listening to this right now, you're gonna be given

0:34:12.160 --> 0:34:15.919
<v Speaker 1>fifty percent of your income to the federal government. That

0:34:15.920 --> 0:34:18.960
<v Speaker 1>that sounds like a lot to me. That sounds like

0:34:19.080 --> 0:34:21.720
<v Speaker 1>more than the Democrats would be able to convince folks

0:34:21.840 --> 0:34:23.839
<v Speaker 1>if they had to tell them what the numbers actually were.

0:34:24.280 --> 0:34:27.840
<v Speaker 1>But I think we're all just getting sick of being

0:34:27.920 --> 0:34:31.600
<v Speaker 1>lectured by incredibly wealthy people about how we all need

0:34:31.640 --> 0:34:33.560
<v Speaker 1>to give more of our money away. You know, if

0:34:33.600 --> 0:34:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Jim Carey wants to give me a check for ten

0:34:35.600 --> 0:34:38.720
<v Speaker 1>million dollars, then maybe I'll want to hear more about

0:34:38.800 --> 0:34:41.600
<v Speaker 1>socialism from him. You know, if I get to sit

0:34:41.600 --> 0:34:46.120
<v Speaker 1>in a position where I am economically immune from the

0:34:46.160 --> 0:34:49.000
<v Speaker 1>bad decision making of those who are pushing socialism, if

0:34:49.040 --> 0:34:51.839
<v Speaker 1>I get to make that decision, that's that's you know,

0:34:52.480 --> 0:34:54.440
<v Speaker 1>it's fine as long as I could live in my

0:34:54.480 --> 0:34:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Malibu mansion. But I don't have a Malibum mansion. I

0:34:56.960 --> 0:34:59.640
<v Speaker 1>gotta live in the real world. And Jim Carey and

0:34:59.719 --> 0:35:01.440
<v Speaker 1>Bill More and the rest of them, they should have

0:35:01.480 --> 0:35:03.040
<v Speaker 1>to live in the real world too. And that means

0:35:03.120 --> 0:35:06.359
<v Speaker 1>if you want to say yes to socialism, it means

0:35:06.360 --> 0:35:12.319
<v Speaker 1>saying yes to massively higher taxes and horrifically slow, if

0:35:12.360 --> 0:35:16.720
<v Speaker 1>not negative, economic growth and all kinds of bad stuff.

0:35:16.800 --> 0:35:19.520
<v Speaker 1>So you know, you should at least be honest about

0:35:19.560 --> 0:35:22.880
<v Speaker 1>what you want. Folks. If they want socialism, well then

0:35:22.920 --> 0:35:25.279
<v Speaker 1>they should get it long and hard. That's my that's

0:35:25.320 --> 0:35:29.479
<v Speaker 1>my opinion on the matter. At least when you're here,

0:35:29.880 --> 0:35:33.239
<v Speaker 1>how great the economy is doing right now. Let's just

0:35:33.320 --> 0:35:41.480
<v Speaker 1>remember when this recovery started. Suddenly Republicans are saying it's America.

0:35:43.239 --> 0:35:46.759
<v Speaker 1>I had to kind of remind them, actually, those job

0:35:46.840 --> 0:35:50.040
<v Speaker 1>numbers are the same as they were in two thousand

0:35:52.040 --> 0:35:57.839
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand six, and anyway, this is the best

0:35:57.880 --> 0:36:02.880
<v Speaker 1>they can manage, folks. Democrats Obama coming out there and saying, oh, well,

0:36:03.120 --> 0:36:07.320
<v Speaker 1>the economy is great right now, but it's because of Obama.

0:36:07.719 --> 0:36:11.920
<v Speaker 1>This is tough to take seriously. I don't take it seriously,

0:36:12.520 --> 0:36:16.880
<v Speaker 1>especially because just do this thought experiment. Imagine for a

0:36:16.920 --> 0:36:20.880
<v Speaker 1>moment that unemployment was six seven eight percent. Imagine for

0:36:20.920 --> 0:36:24.319
<v Speaker 1>a moment that the stock market had tanked over the

0:36:24.400 --> 0:36:28.040
<v Speaker 1>last at some point of the last year, Imagine that

0:36:28.440 --> 0:36:34.240
<v Speaker 1>hiring had slowed dramatically. Would anybody say that Obama's massive

0:36:34.760 --> 0:36:39.040
<v Speaker 1>sea of q E and quantitative easing and and the

0:36:39.160 --> 0:36:42.200
<v Speaker 1>stimulus boone doggle and all the other stuff that was

0:36:42.239 --> 0:36:46.280
<v Speaker 1>done was responsible. No, of course not. They would all

0:36:46.360 --> 0:36:50.040
<v Speaker 1>say that Trump is a buffoon, He's an imbecile, and

0:36:50.080 --> 0:36:53.400
<v Speaker 1>that's why the economy is bad. So by that standard

0:36:53.440 --> 0:36:58.120
<v Speaker 1>that we all know is there, the economy is incredible.

0:36:58.680 --> 0:37:00.839
<v Speaker 1>The economy is doing so very well, and not just

0:37:01.040 --> 0:37:04.880
<v Speaker 1>on a general basis, but as compared to what we

0:37:04.920 --> 0:37:08.319
<v Speaker 1>were told would happen if in fact Trump were president. Right,

0:37:08.760 --> 0:37:11.480
<v Speaker 1>it's good no matter who you are, But compared to

0:37:11.520 --> 0:37:16.160
<v Speaker 1>the catastrophe they said would happened. Uh, it's it's amazing.

0:37:16.200 --> 0:37:18.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the economy is it's almost hard to believe

0:37:18.520 --> 0:37:21.359
<v Speaker 1>how good it is. And I just noticed that this

0:37:21.440 --> 0:37:23.840
<v Speaker 1>is where that this is where the media unfortunately still

0:37:24.840 --> 0:37:27.720
<v Speaker 1>gets to play such a prominent role. How many stories

0:37:27.760 --> 0:37:31.160
<v Speaker 1>are there on how powerful Uh, the tax cuts have

0:37:31.239 --> 0:37:33.480
<v Speaker 1>been for the economy. How many stories are there on

0:37:33.600 --> 0:37:37.560
<v Speaker 1>even honestly, in the short term more impactful, which is

0:37:37.600 --> 0:37:39.120
<v Speaker 1>a word I know people don't like when you use

0:37:39.200 --> 0:37:40.959
<v Speaker 1>that way, but I use it that way sometimes because

0:37:40.960 --> 0:37:47.520
<v Speaker 1>everybody does. How much more profoundly important the anti regulatory moves,

0:37:47.520 --> 0:37:53.200
<v Speaker 1>the cutbacks and regulations have been for businesses in this country. Um,

0:37:53.719 --> 0:37:55.719
<v Speaker 1>you won't hear those stories because the media doesn't want

0:37:55.719 --> 0:37:58.400
<v Speaker 1>to tell you those stories. And as I've been saying,

0:37:58.400 --> 0:38:00.080
<v Speaker 1>what we don't have nearly enough of a folk this

0:38:00.280 --> 0:38:03.879
<v Speaker 1>on healthcare or focus on what the Democrats really want

0:38:03.920 --> 0:38:08.400
<v Speaker 1>what it comes to immigration. We're letting the Democrats control

0:38:08.520 --> 0:38:11.480
<v Speaker 1>far too much of this narrative going into the midterms.

0:38:11.520 --> 0:38:13.440
<v Speaker 1>That needs to stop. And that's why they've They've brought

0:38:13.480 --> 0:38:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Obama out because they think that he's the most powerful

0:38:16.800 --> 0:38:21.520
<v Speaker 1>messenger that they have. Now. I would love it if

0:38:21.880 --> 0:38:27.000
<v Speaker 1>President Trump would continue what he's doing, which is call

0:38:27.040 --> 0:38:29.520
<v Speaker 1>out Obama. I mean, his line about Obama putting him

0:38:29.520 --> 0:38:31.560
<v Speaker 1>to sleep with the speech is one of the best

0:38:31.560 --> 0:38:33.919
<v Speaker 1>political lines I've heard in a long time because it's

0:38:33.960 --> 0:38:38.839
<v Speaker 1>so true, because it's the reality of Obama speeches. We're

0:38:38.840 --> 0:38:41.440
<v Speaker 1>all told they were so great, and nobody was allowed

0:38:41.440 --> 0:38:44.600
<v Speaker 1>to criticize, nobody was allowed to say anything about him

0:38:44.680 --> 0:38:46.520
<v Speaker 1>because that would have been mean, you would have even

0:38:46.520 --> 0:38:50.920
<v Speaker 1>been racist. Whatever. But Obama gives really boring speeches. In fact,

0:38:51.480 --> 0:38:53.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean the first two minutes because he's look, the

0:38:53.520 --> 0:38:56.879
<v Speaker 1>guy sounds good, he's you know, uh got a got

0:38:56.880 --> 0:39:00.160
<v Speaker 1>a certain charisma, and I get all that. But his

0:39:00.200 --> 0:39:04.440
<v Speaker 1>speeches go on and on and and his his baseline

0:39:04.640 --> 0:39:08.160
<v Speaker 1>for talking to the American people is really pretty close

0:39:08.200 --> 0:39:11.080
<v Speaker 1>to a kind of condescension. It's always, you know, I'm

0:39:11.120 --> 0:39:14.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm amazing, let me solve all your problems. And and

0:39:14.840 --> 0:39:19.680
<v Speaker 1>the amount of uh straw man burning he does on

0:39:19.719 --> 0:39:23.520
<v Speaker 1>the other side is is pretty astonishing, right, It's always

0:39:23.560 --> 0:39:26.120
<v Speaker 1>the other side doesn't want babies to have food and

0:39:26.160 --> 0:39:29.399
<v Speaker 1>old people to have healthcare. The other side, that's not

0:39:29.760 --> 0:39:32.279
<v Speaker 1>that's not what the other side wants. Who who told

0:39:32.320 --> 0:39:34.960
<v Speaker 1>you that, Obama? Whereas what the other side they don't

0:39:34.960 --> 0:39:37.520
<v Speaker 1>believe in food, they don't believe in medicine, they don't

0:39:37.520 --> 0:39:40.120
<v Speaker 1>believe in shelter. I'm here to tell you, if you

0:39:40.200 --> 0:39:42.280
<v Speaker 1>do what I want, you're gonna have all those things

0:39:42.880 --> 0:39:47.000
<v Speaker 1>and more. It's gonna be great. You know, I don't

0:39:47.000 --> 0:39:50.040
<v Speaker 1>think that Obama was as especially when you get him

0:39:50.080 --> 0:39:51.720
<v Speaker 1>off the cuff, when you get him off of a script.

0:39:51.760 --> 0:39:54.239
<v Speaker 1>It was never that impressive. And I think that I

0:39:54.239 --> 0:39:56.160
<v Speaker 1>think that Trump could be his kryptonite the way that

0:39:56.200 --> 0:39:58.440
<v Speaker 1>he was Hilary's as well. I think that Trump maybe

0:39:59.239 --> 0:40:05.120
<v Speaker 1>able to destroy the aura of invincibility political invincibility around

0:40:05.160 --> 0:40:07.759
<v Speaker 1>around Barack Obama. But but on the economy, folks, the

0:40:07.760 --> 0:40:09.720
<v Speaker 1>fact that they're trying to say that it's the Obama

0:40:09.719 --> 0:40:13.520
<v Speaker 1>economy just goes to show you they have no answers.

0:40:14.000 --> 0:40:17.600
<v Speaker 1>They have nothing that they can say that makes it

0:40:17.680 --> 0:40:21.440
<v Speaker 1>the economy not good. Uh. So that's why we we

0:40:21.560 --> 0:40:24.359
<v Speaker 1>might be able to defy recent political history here going

0:40:24.400 --> 0:40:27.040
<v Speaker 1>into the interms. I'm concerned about it. I think you

0:40:27.040 --> 0:40:31.200
<v Speaker 1>should be concerned about it too. But it is certainly possible.

0:40:31.239 --> 0:40:33.239
<v Speaker 1>It is certainly possible for that for the first time

0:40:33.880 --> 0:40:36.800
<v Speaker 1>in a long time, you will see in the first

0:40:36.840 --> 0:40:41.120
<v Speaker 1>two years after a new president a well, not a

0:40:41.160 --> 0:40:47.719
<v Speaker 1>massive wave. I think that's certainly true. Um, economic confidence

0:40:48.160 --> 0:40:51.239
<v Speaker 1>is really high, by the way, that's the uh, that's

0:40:51.280 --> 0:40:54.360
<v Speaker 1>the headline on the Wall Street Journal today. Economic economic

0:40:54.400 --> 0:40:59.359
<v Speaker 1>confidence is really really high. Well, it's there, there's there's

0:40:59.360 --> 0:41:02.439
<v Speaker 1>truth to that of friends. Uh, it is, and there's

0:41:02.440 --> 0:41:04.279
<v Speaker 1>a lot of hiring, and there's and and now you're

0:41:04.280 --> 0:41:07.239
<v Speaker 1>actually given this place of is it possible that this

0:41:07.280 --> 0:41:11.560
<v Speaker 1>will keep going? Is it possible this will continue? There's

0:41:11.600 --> 0:41:15.920
<v Speaker 1>almost a sense of foreboding. I think that Trump's economic

0:41:16.000 --> 0:41:19.840
<v Speaker 1>success thus far it's impossible for it to continue. That

0:41:19.920 --> 0:41:23.640
<v Speaker 1>there will be a natural corrective, and that corrective will

0:41:23.680 --> 0:41:27.120
<v Speaker 1>open up the doorway for the Democrats to come rushing

0:41:27.120 --> 0:41:29.600
<v Speaker 1>in and say, ce Ce, we told you, we told you,

0:41:30.080 --> 0:41:34.239
<v Speaker 1>even though that wouldn't if it were a short term thing,

0:41:34.360 --> 0:41:36.160
<v Speaker 1>if it were just as I said, a correction and

0:41:36.200 --> 0:41:39.560
<v Speaker 1>not a crash or or a depression, that would I'm

0:41:39.600 --> 0:41:43.239
<v Speaker 1>prove that what Trump had done was not as beneficial

0:41:43.280 --> 0:41:47.239
<v Speaker 1>as what we've been saying all along. But remember Democrats

0:41:47.280 --> 0:41:52.880
<v Speaker 1>have capitalized there. The biggest moments in Democrat political history

0:41:52.960 --> 0:41:56.080
<v Speaker 1>in the twenty century and the twenty one century UH,

0:41:56.200 --> 0:42:00.239
<v Speaker 1>several of them have revolved around an economic cry cyst

0:42:00.280 --> 0:42:05.160
<v Speaker 1>that Democrats leverage to push status and UH and socialist

0:42:05.239 --> 0:42:09.200
<v Speaker 1>policies to enlarge, to dramatically enlarge the government at the

0:42:09.239 --> 0:42:13.080
<v Speaker 1>expense of individual rights and private property and the free market,

0:42:13.560 --> 0:42:15.600
<v Speaker 1>and they've done it because when people are scared, they

0:42:15.640 --> 0:42:17.920
<v Speaker 1>want someone to help them. They want someone to tell

0:42:17.920 --> 0:42:21.520
<v Speaker 1>them it's all gonna be okay. When you're retirement savings

0:42:21.640 --> 0:42:23.440
<v Speaker 1>or your pension looks like it's going up and smoke

0:42:23.680 --> 0:42:26.000
<v Speaker 1>and you might lose your house. Anyone who says we're

0:42:26.000 --> 0:42:29.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna make it all okay, you'll listen to truth. There's

0:42:29.120 --> 0:42:31.920
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats don't make it all okay. They just spend

0:42:31.920 --> 0:42:34.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot more of your money, kick the can down

0:42:34.040 --> 0:42:37.239
<v Speaker 1>the road, make it a problem for future generations. And oh,

0:42:37.320 --> 0:42:39.440
<v Speaker 1>by the way, they do all these other bad things

0:42:39.880 --> 0:42:43.120
<v Speaker 1>to keep you in the meantime feeling like things are

0:42:43.160 --> 0:42:46.600
<v Speaker 1>improving when a reality, they're just writing checks that right,

0:42:46.680 --> 0:42:50.080
<v Speaker 1>and checks their bodies can't cash. I guess that kind

0:42:50.080 --> 0:42:52.000
<v Speaker 1>of makes sense. I'm not even gonna say that was

0:42:52.040 --> 0:42:56.440
<v Speaker 1>a movie quote because you already know that. Please also

0:42:56.800 --> 0:43:00.000
<v Speaker 1>welcome up to the stage the students from Parkland High School.

0:43:01.040 --> 0:43:05.800
<v Speaker 1>David Hogg. I have a question for you, guys, who's

0:43:05.800 --> 0:43:15.279
<v Speaker 1>ready to save America? So here we got David Hogg

0:43:15.320 --> 0:43:22.240
<v Speaker 1>and Michael Moore too, favorite pundits of the the far left,

0:43:22.239 --> 0:43:25.600
<v Speaker 1>the progressive left in this country. Uh notice, You know,

0:43:26.000 --> 0:43:29.680
<v Speaker 1>Hogg now has become a at least an MSNBC circles

0:43:29.680 --> 0:43:34.560
<v Speaker 1>a household name, and and he just the grandiose rhetoric

0:43:34.640 --> 0:43:38.080
<v Speaker 1>flows from this kid, who's ready to save America. But

0:43:38.080 --> 0:43:42.279
<v Speaker 1>but he goes on, who's ready to make America the

0:43:42.280 --> 0:43:45.640
<v Speaker 1>country that we say is on paper and make it

0:43:45.680 --> 0:43:55.560
<v Speaker 1>the actual country that it wants to be. You know this,

0:43:55.560 --> 0:43:58.480
<v Speaker 1>this goes over really well with the progressive left. You

0:43:58.520 --> 0:44:00.239
<v Speaker 1>know that that that America needs to be ate a

0:44:00.280 --> 0:44:02.719
<v Speaker 1>lot better, that it's not the place that we say

0:44:02.760 --> 0:44:05.680
<v Speaker 1>it is, that there's a there's a fraudulence at the

0:44:05.680 --> 0:44:09.399
<v Speaker 1>heart of this thing we call America. Meanwhile, by any

0:44:09.400 --> 0:44:13.560
<v Speaker 1>objective measure, any normal person would say, wow, America. Heck yeah,

0:44:13.760 --> 0:44:16.160
<v Speaker 1>this place is amazing, and it is amazing and in

0:44:16.160 --> 0:44:18.040
<v Speaker 1>fact a lot of ways right now, folks, it's better

0:44:18.040 --> 0:44:21.439
<v Speaker 1>than it's ever been. It's certainly wealthier than it's ever been,

0:44:21.880 --> 0:44:24.560
<v Speaker 1>it's safer than it's ever been. I know it's hard

0:44:24.600 --> 0:44:27.960
<v Speaker 1>to believe, but it's true. It's true. People say, oh, book,

0:44:28.000 --> 0:44:30.120
<v Speaker 1>what about back in the good old days of You

0:44:30.239 --> 0:44:31.960
<v Speaker 1>tell me when the good old days were, folks, And

0:44:32.000 --> 0:44:34.920
<v Speaker 1>I'll say, you mean when there were like Nazi submarines

0:44:34.960 --> 0:44:37.600
<v Speaker 1>off the coast of Long Island, or when the Japanese

0:44:37.640 --> 0:44:40.319
<v Speaker 1>were bombing Pearl Harbor, or you know what, when when

0:44:40.360 --> 0:44:43.000
<v Speaker 1>we were concerned about foreign countries invading us and they

0:44:43.000 --> 0:44:46.040
<v Speaker 1>could actually beat us. What what were the good old

0:44:46.120 --> 0:44:48.200
<v Speaker 1>days when things were so much better here? I would

0:44:48.200 --> 0:44:51.200
<v Speaker 1>just wonder when that was. I know that it's usually

0:44:51.200 --> 0:44:54.480
<v Speaker 1>not a crowd pleaser to say things are awesome. People

0:44:54.520 --> 0:44:57.200
<v Speaker 1>generally want to hear about catastrophe. But America is pretty

0:44:57.200 --> 0:45:00.600
<v Speaker 1>awesome unless you're on the progressive left. But how and

0:45:00.719 --> 0:45:04.799
<v Speaker 1>Michael Moore continue, I think it's the most important thing

0:45:04.840 --> 0:45:07.920
<v Speaker 1>to realize. However, it's the problems that we face as

0:45:07.920 --> 0:45:11.440
<v Speaker 1>a country, whether it be water in Flint, Michigan, or

0:45:11.480 --> 0:45:14.080
<v Speaker 1>the amount of mass incarceration of people in color of

0:45:14.160 --> 0:45:18.560
<v Speaker 1>color that can't vote in Florida. The amount of eligible

0:45:18.600 --> 0:45:21.400
<v Speaker 1>African Americans that would otherwise be eligible to vote that

0:45:21.480 --> 0:45:27.080
<v Speaker 1>can't because of a previous conviction is in Kentucky, it's

0:45:27.120 --> 0:45:30.839
<v Speaker 1>in Mississippi and Alabama it's fifteen to six. These are

0:45:30.840 --> 0:45:33.680
<v Speaker 1>people of color that have been historically discriminated against and

0:45:33.840 --> 0:45:35.759
<v Speaker 1>still are to this day, and how their voting rights

0:45:35.800 --> 0:45:40.560
<v Speaker 1>taken away it's exactly turn that shame into your vote

0:45:42.760 --> 0:45:47.600
<v Speaker 1>if you're not Canadian. I can't help but notice that

0:45:47.960 --> 0:45:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Mr Hogg, who is taking a year off before college

0:45:51.680 --> 0:45:56.359
<v Speaker 1>to become an advocate for left wing causes. So now

0:45:56.400 --> 0:45:58.680
<v Speaker 1>he's officially appundit, folks. He's no longer a high school

0:45:58.680 --> 0:46:01.920
<v Speaker 1>student that we can discussed or debate. He's a public person.

0:46:01.960 --> 0:46:05.360
<v Speaker 1>He's inserted himself into the public debate over policy. We

0:46:05.400 --> 0:46:10.360
<v Speaker 1>are allowed to say that he is often ignorant of

0:46:10.400 --> 0:46:14.320
<v Speaker 1>the subject matter he discusses, and quite honestly doesn't have

0:46:14.360 --> 0:46:18.239
<v Speaker 1>a particularly sophisticated view of a lot of things. And

0:46:18.400 --> 0:46:20.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm being pretty kind. I know some of my conservative

0:46:20.840 --> 0:46:26.960
<v Speaker 1>brethren and uh sisters, what's the female of Brethren cestran,

0:46:27.320 --> 0:46:29.359
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I gotta think about what that is.

0:46:29.920 --> 0:46:31.920
<v Speaker 1>But they're much harder on him than that I have been,

0:46:31.920 --> 0:46:33.640
<v Speaker 1>although I'm sure that will change over time. Because I've

0:46:33.680 --> 0:46:36.320
<v Speaker 1>a feeling Hog who used to be used as a

0:46:36.360 --> 0:46:39.200
<v Speaker 1>weapon to try to get people deep platformed and fired,

0:46:39.600 --> 0:46:44.000
<v Speaker 1>I have a feeling that he will in fact be

0:46:44.160 --> 0:46:46.279
<v Speaker 1>somebody who is a weapon for the left. You know,

0:46:46.360 --> 0:46:51.040
<v Speaker 1>I had just a brief aside here I had on

0:46:51.120 --> 0:46:55.680
<v Speaker 1>my show gosh. Today on Rising we had the Media

0:46:55.760 --> 0:47:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Matters Chairman David Brock. I just have a really tough

0:47:00.080 --> 0:47:01.879
<v Speaker 1>time with these people who and but you might want

0:47:01.880 --> 0:47:04.560
<v Speaker 1>to watch the interview because I think I pretty in

0:47:04.560 --> 0:47:10.319
<v Speaker 1>in completely um respectful as to impolite a fashion, because

0:47:10.320 --> 0:47:12.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm not respectful toward him. I don't respect what he does,

0:47:12.680 --> 0:47:15.280
<v Speaker 1>but I'm polite because I'm in a place of business

0:47:15.280 --> 0:47:17.600
<v Speaker 1>and I'm doing my job. But in polite fashion, I

0:47:17.600 --> 0:47:21.120
<v Speaker 1>think I dismantled his foolish argument about Kavanaugh. I don't

0:47:21.120 --> 0:47:23.719
<v Speaker 1>like these people to try to get people fired. I

0:47:23.719 --> 0:47:28.040
<v Speaker 1>don't like this new trend among the uh the the

0:47:28.160 --> 0:47:31.399
<v Speaker 1>left wing to do everything in their power to try

0:47:31.400 --> 0:47:34.400
<v Speaker 1>and get people to be, you know, kicked off of

0:47:34.400 --> 0:47:37.080
<v Speaker 1>whatever their platform is, to make sure that they can't

0:47:37.760 --> 0:47:40.960
<v Speaker 1>make a living, which which I think is really what

0:47:41.080 --> 0:47:43.960
<v Speaker 1>it's all about for them. I think Hog fits into

0:47:43.960 --> 0:47:45.839
<v Speaker 1>that category. I think he's one of these people that

0:47:46.400 --> 0:47:50.960
<v Speaker 1>is also trying to find ways to eliminate people from

0:47:51.000 --> 0:47:54.400
<v Speaker 1>the conversation, from the public conversation. But a We'll have

0:47:54.440 --> 0:47:57.320
<v Speaker 1>more time for Hog later. Notice, how tho his focus

0:47:57.320 --> 0:48:00.719
<v Speaker 1>of why America is not as great as it should be,

0:48:00.920 --> 0:48:04.320
<v Speaker 1>or is not what it purports to be. He doesn't

0:48:04.360 --> 0:48:08.839
<v Speaker 1>mention at all, for example, opioids, and I just find

0:48:08.880 --> 0:48:13.759
<v Speaker 1>this really nowhere. He goes right to mass incarceration. And

0:48:13.760 --> 0:48:16.560
<v Speaker 1>and I'm not saying that there there isn't some over criminalization,

0:48:16.719 --> 0:48:20.560
<v Speaker 1>but over criminalization in the criminal justice system and mass

0:48:20.600 --> 0:48:24.759
<v Speaker 1>incarceration are not the same thing. Mass incarceration just means

0:48:24.800 --> 0:48:27.000
<v Speaker 1>we have a lot of people in prison. Well, what

0:48:27.080 --> 0:48:29.840
<v Speaker 1>I want to know is did they do bad things?

0:48:30.320 --> 0:48:33.920
<v Speaker 1>And are they serving a sentence commensurate with the gravity

0:48:33.920 --> 0:48:36.000
<v Speaker 1>of their crime. If the answer to those two things

0:48:36.040 --> 0:48:38.040
<v Speaker 1>are both yes, I don't have a problem with it.

0:48:38.800 --> 0:48:42.600
<v Speaker 1>What conservatives don't like is over criminalization. It's, oh, well,

0:48:42.760 --> 0:48:47.760
<v Speaker 1>you destroyed documents in a civil uh and a civil

0:48:47.800 --> 0:48:51.000
<v Speaker 1>probe for you know, business that has a civil liability.

0:48:51.080 --> 0:48:53.320
<v Speaker 1>But now you're gonna fall under a DoD Frank guideline.

0:48:53.360 --> 0:48:55.280
<v Speaker 1>You could face up to twenty years in federal prison.

0:48:55.320 --> 0:48:57.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, I don't like when you wrap

0:48:57.600 --> 0:49:00.560
<v Speaker 1>lobster that you catch off the coast of Honduras in

0:49:00.760 --> 0:49:05.239
<v Speaker 1>plastic instead of paper, and therefore you face a year

0:49:05.239 --> 0:49:07.960
<v Speaker 1>in federal prison. When we criminalize things that should not

0:49:08.000 --> 0:49:10.799
<v Speaker 1>be criminal, that's a big problem for me. And when

0:49:10.840 --> 0:49:12.879
<v Speaker 1>we send people to prison for far too long, that's

0:49:12.920 --> 0:49:14.239
<v Speaker 1>a problem for me. And I think some of that

0:49:14.280 --> 0:49:19.239
<v Speaker 1>happens with drugs. But over criminalization is just something that

0:49:19.280 --> 0:49:24.040
<v Speaker 1>the left talks about as a means of pandering to

0:49:24.640 --> 0:49:27.160
<v Speaker 1>this social justice left that believes that the reason people

0:49:27.160 --> 0:49:30.600
<v Speaker 1>are in prison is generally racism and structural racism. Well,

0:49:30.640 --> 0:49:32.560
<v Speaker 1>I just want to know if somebody committed a crime,

0:49:33.120 --> 0:49:35.280
<v Speaker 1>then they should be in prison. So we're talking about

0:49:35.360 --> 0:49:38.680
<v Speaker 1>all these people being innocent or what does over rather,

0:49:38.920 --> 0:49:41.960
<v Speaker 1>what does mass incarceration really means? We know what over

0:49:42.000 --> 0:49:46.920
<v Speaker 1>criminalization means. But he skips right over opioids. If you're

0:49:47.040 --> 0:49:50.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna have a rally and talk about the most urgent

0:49:50.040 --> 0:49:53.440
<v Speaker 1>problem facing this country, and you don't jump to the

0:49:53.480 --> 0:49:55.480
<v Speaker 1>fact that seventy thousand people a year and this is

0:49:55.560 --> 0:49:58.600
<v Speaker 1>bipartisan problems, seventy thousand people last year, I think with

0:49:58.680 --> 0:50:01.040
<v Speaker 1>seventy three thousand total might might have been upper down.

0:50:01.040 --> 0:50:06.680
<v Speaker 1>A thousand died of drug overdoses from opioids. If you

0:50:06.760 --> 0:50:08.600
<v Speaker 1>are not going to focus on that right away, I

0:50:08.640 --> 0:50:11.719
<v Speaker 1>want to know why. I want to know why. Voting rights. Oh,

0:50:11.760 --> 0:50:15.360
<v Speaker 1>that's right, because the midterms coming up. Why are voting

0:50:15.480 --> 0:50:18.040
<v Speaker 1>rights for felons a more important issue? If you're gonna

0:50:18.080 --> 0:50:21.680
<v Speaker 1>try to do great things and and make America this

0:50:21.760 --> 0:50:24.520
<v Speaker 1>awesome place that you say it's not already, why aren't

0:50:24.520 --> 0:50:26.000
<v Speaker 1>you going to deal with the fact that seventy thousand

0:50:26.080 --> 0:50:29.480
<v Speaker 1>plus people died of opioid overdoses last year? Where does

0:50:29.520 --> 0:50:33.200
<v Speaker 1>that factor into all of this? And and of course

0:50:33.239 --> 0:50:37.000
<v Speaker 1>with hog you have gun control as a constant. And

0:50:37.200 --> 0:50:39.919
<v Speaker 1>I had to deal with a Lissa Maltto recently say

0:50:39.960 --> 0:50:43.160
<v Speaker 1>to me that it's as easy to get a cappuccino

0:50:43.200 --> 0:50:44.600
<v Speaker 1>as it is to get an a R fifteen, which

0:50:44.600 --> 0:50:48.040
<v Speaker 1>which is just wrong. But she said it, and I

0:50:48.640 --> 0:50:50.880
<v Speaker 1>was taken aback because it seems like such a foolish,

0:50:50.920 --> 0:50:53.160
<v Speaker 1>such a stupid thing to say. But now, I don't

0:50:53.160 --> 0:50:55.879
<v Speaker 1>know if you've seen this, folks, that the new initiative

0:50:55.920 --> 0:51:02.040
<v Speaker 1>out there to try and find a way to uh

0:51:02.200 --> 0:51:05.520
<v Speaker 1>cut down on gun violence is California is thinking about

0:51:05.560 --> 0:51:10.399
<v Speaker 1>putting a huge price on bullets. That's right. They want

0:51:10.400 --> 0:51:15.760
<v Speaker 1>to make bullets more expensive. They think that that's gonna

0:51:15.760 --> 0:51:20.160
<v Speaker 1>be a a an effective uh you know, an effective

0:51:20.200 --> 0:51:23.200
<v Speaker 1>way and oh, by the way, and limit ammunition. So

0:51:23.239 --> 0:51:25.040
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna make it harder because you know, if you

0:51:25.080 --> 0:51:28.319
<v Speaker 1>can only get a hundred rounds of ammunition, uh, then

0:51:28.360 --> 0:51:31.400
<v Speaker 1>you're not going to be able to kill what ten people?

0:51:31.400 --> 0:51:33.799
<v Speaker 1>I mean, how many mass shootings do they really think

0:51:33.840 --> 0:51:36.279
<v Speaker 1>are going to be stopped because of this? And given

0:51:36.320 --> 0:51:39.200
<v Speaker 1>how much ammunition is already in circulation, how much stockpiling

0:51:39.280 --> 0:51:43.399
<v Speaker 1>of it has already occurred, this is an idiotic idea.

0:51:43.840 --> 0:51:46.719
<v Speaker 1>I would note that the the only time that they

0:51:46.760 --> 0:51:50.640
<v Speaker 1>say this is useful is that in some states ammunition

0:51:50.719 --> 0:51:54.839
<v Speaker 1>purchases are not regulated as tightly as firearms purchases, and

0:51:54.880 --> 0:51:59.200
<v Speaker 1>so prohibited possessors are able to get ammunition. Then they

0:51:59.239 --> 0:52:02.600
<v Speaker 1>go over the list they end up arresting them. But

0:52:02.760 --> 0:52:04.960
<v Speaker 1>what I note is that, well, the only reason that

0:52:05.000 --> 0:52:07.320
<v Speaker 1>they're able to make those arrests is that they're effectively

0:52:07.320 --> 0:52:10.000
<v Speaker 1>doing a sting operation. And it would be like if

0:52:10.040 --> 0:52:12.439
<v Speaker 1>they were selling guns to people and and seeing who

0:52:12.480 --> 0:52:15.759
<v Speaker 1>buys one, and it's selling guns to people without doing

0:52:15.800 --> 0:52:18.359
<v Speaker 1>any background check, and then see who buys a gun

0:52:18.440 --> 0:52:21.960
<v Speaker 1>without a background check that shouldn't have one. Well, in

0:52:22.000 --> 0:52:24.000
<v Speaker 1>that process, you're also putting a lot of guns out

0:52:24.000 --> 0:52:27.000
<v Speaker 1>on the streets. So it's it seems somewhat counterintuitive to

0:52:27.040 --> 0:52:29.360
<v Speaker 1>you as well. We're gonna sell ammunition to everybody, but

0:52:29.400 --> 0:52:33.560
<v Speaker 1>then if a prohibited possessor comes up on our list, uh,

0:52:34.280 --> 0:52:36.160
<v Speaker 1>we're able to arrest them. So maybe this is a

0:52:36.160 --> 0:52:39.080
<v Speaker 1>good law enforcement tactic or a good gun control tactic.

0:52:39.360 --> 0:52:41.360
<v Speaker 1>To that, I say, you know how easy it is

0:52:41.400 --> 0:52:45.040
<v Speaker 1>for somebody to transfer their ammunition to somebody else. I mean, no, nobody,

0:52:45.200 --> 0:52:48.880
<v Speaker 1>nobody's gonna know the difference with that. So anybody who

0:52:48.960 --> 0:52:50.880
<v Speaker 1>understands what the rules are, we'll just get around them

0:52:50.880 --> 0:52:54.000
<v Speaker 1>by making sure somebody who's not a prohibited possessor, meaning

0:52:54.000 --> 0:52:57.560
<v Speaker 1>a felon or somebody somebody who's been convicted of domestic

0:52:57.600 --> 0:53:01.000
<v Speaker 1>violence gets their hands on this stuff. So I just

0:53:01.080 --> 0:53:03.960
<v Speaker 1>think the notion that you're gonna limit bullets or make

0:53:04.000 --> 0:53:07.080
<v Speaker 1>them really really expensive, I think actually Patrick moynihan, Senator

0:53:07.160 --> 0:53:10.719
<v Speaker 1>from uh New Jersey, a long time ago, wanted to

0:53:10.800 --> 0:53:13.600
<v Speaker 1>wanted to make a hollow point ten dollars or something something.

0:53:13.640 --> 0:53:16.279
<v Speaker 1>Really moynihan had some things he was smart on this,

0:53:16.280 --> 0:53:18.440
<v Speaker 1>this was not one of them. But I would note

0:53:18.480 --> 0:53:20.080
<v Speaker 1>that with guns in general, you have a lot of

0:53:20.080 --> 0:53:23.520
<v Speaker 1>people that say very very stupid things. People that are

0:53:23.520 --> 0:53:27.960
<v Speaker 1>otherwise quite intelligent. Are are really buffoonish on the issue

0:53:27.960 --> 0:53:30.200
<v Speaker 1>of gun control, and it's because for them, it's as

0:53:30.280 --> 0:53:33.160
<v Speaker 1>I've told you, it's a cultural signifier. It's much more

0:53:33.239 --> 0:53:36.400
<v Speaker 1>about that than it is about actually preventing violence or

0:53:36.440 --> 0:53:41.160
<v Speaker 1>stopping violence from occurring using firearms. Alright, team, I hope

0:53:41.160 --> 0:53:43.960
<v Speaker 1>you enjoyed the new format of the podcast out early.

0:53:44.560 --> 0:53:48.839
<v Speaker 1>Please do subscribe on iTunes, share it around and let

0:53:48.840 --> 0:53:50.759
<v Speaker 1>me know what you think of the new format on

0:53:50.800 --> 0:53:56.360
<v Speaker 1>Facebook dot com slash buck Sexton remember shields High