WEBVTT - How to Win Bets and Influence Elections

0:00:15.604 --> 0:00:25.964
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin. Welcome back to Risky Business, a show about making

0:00:26.004 --> 0:00:28.004
<v Speaker 1>better decisions. I'm Maria Kannakova.

0:00:28.324 --> 0:00:31.724
<v Speaker 2>I'm Nate Silver. Do you ever see the sixty minutes

0:00:31.764 --> 0:00:33.804
<v Speaker 2>thing where they're like, You're like, I'm Marley Saper, I'm

0:00:33.844 --> 0:00:36.844
<v Speaker 2>Anderson Cooper, and they go for like fifteen fucking people.

0:00:36.924 --> 0:00:39.364
<v Speaker 2>It's like too much, It is too much.

0:00:39.364 --> 0:00:42.684
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad there's only two of us. So, Nate, what

0:00:42.724 --> 0:00:43.924
<v Speaker 1>are we going to talk about today?

0:00:44.044 --> 0:00:46.684
<v Speaker 2>Today on the show, we'll check in on Carolyn Ellison,

0:00:46.844 --> 0:00:50.204
<v Speaker 2>the former CEO of Alametor Research and girlfriend of Sam

0:00:50.284 --> 0:00:52.884
<v Speaker 2>mcmin fried, who was sentenced to two years for her

0:00:52.964 --> 0:00:54.204
<v Speaker 2>role in the FTX fraud.

0:00:54.404 --> 0:00:57.484
<v Speaker 1>And after that we'll have a little politics update where

0:00:57.524 --> 0:01:01.524
<v Speaker 1>we talk about the latest polling and also what actually

0:01:01.604 --> 0:01:04.124
<v Speaker 1>makes a difference to the numbers. Is there anything that

0:01:04.164 --> 0:01:07.684
<v Speaker 1>we can do in the next few weeks to push

0:01:07.724 --> 0:01:10.844
<v Speaker 1>the push the polls one or the other make our

0:01:10.884 --> 0:01:13.204
<v Speaker 1>candidate more or less likely to win?

0:01:13.644 --> 0:01:16.324
<v Speaker 2>And then we'll say rip two. A couple of legendary

0:01:16.364 --> 0:01:26.044
<v Speaker 2>degenerate gamblers.

0:01:26.724 --> 0:01:31.924
<v Speaker 1>So Caroline Ellison, former CEO, first co CEO, right, and

0:01:31.964 --> 0:01:35.044
<v Speaker 1>then just sole CEO of Alameda, which was the hedge

0:01:35.044 --> 0:01:39.164
<v Speaker 1>fund that was associated with FTX. We've talked about saying

0:01:39.164 --> 0:01:43.204
<v Speaker 1>by Quinfried, We've talked about FTX, but this was a

0:01:43.244 --> 0:01:48.244
<v Speaker 1>big one because Caroline was one of the biggest names

0:01:48.284 --> 0:01:51.604
<v Speaker 1>to testify against SBF and to kind of bring the

0:01:51.644 --> 0:01:55.044
<v Speaker 1>whole thing down, and this week she has been sentenced

0:01:55.124 --> 0:01:57.604
<v Speaker 1>herself to two years. Nate, did you get a chance

0:01:57.644 --> 0:01:59.844
<v Speaker 1>to meet Caroline when you were doing your research?

0:02:00.084 --> 0:02:04.444
<v Speaker 2>Didn't? We put in a request, but she smartly ignored

0:02:04.484 --> 0:02:07.204
<v Speaker 2>it because unlike Sam Bateman Freed, she wasn't talking to

0:02:07.324 --> 0:02:10.804
<v Speaker 2>journalists while she was, you know, on trial for various

0:02:10.844 --> 0:02:14.764
<v Speaker 2>fraud charges. I did obtain transcripts of the three days

0:02:14.804 --> 0:02:20.484
<v Speaker 2>that Carolyn Nelson spent in court testifying about SBF, and

0:02:20.524 --> 0:02:26.324
<v Speaker 2>this was very compelling testimony that basically had SBF dead

0:02:26.364 --> 0:02:29.604
<v Speaker 2>to rights. In fact, the lawyer that I talked to

0:02:29.644 --> 0:02:34.484
<v Speaker 2>about the case said that he thought Sam, after Carolyn's testimony,

0:02:34.644 --> 0:02:37.524
<v Speaker 2>was stupid to testify himself, that he was going to

0:02:37.604 --> 0:02:40.884
<v Speaker 2>come across unsympathetically to a jury, was going to perjure

0:02:40.964 --> 0:02:43.164
<v Speaker 2>himself and get a larger sentence, which is what happened.

0:02:43.204 --> 0:02:46.724
<v Speaker 2>This BF got twenty years. That the judge is a

0:02:46.764 --> 0:02:51.244
<v Speaker 2>no nonsense. Judge. Judge Kaplan presided over many trials and

0:02:51.324 --> 0:02:58.124
<v Speaker 2>was not impressed by dear old Sam bakmanfree so things

0:02:58.164 --> 0:03:02.764
<v Speaker 2>that were a parent in her testimony. One was that

0:03:02.804 --> 0:03:06.084
<v Speaker 2>this was that Sam had a good deal of awareness

0:03:06.644 --> 0:03:10.444
<v Speaker 2>of what was happening, that he was where, that she

0:03:10.644 --> 0:03:13.484
<v Speaker 2>was taking on risks that could result in the bankruptcy

0:03:14.044 --> 0:03:17.044
<v Speaker 2>of the company that she had presented. It's prechuse to

0:03:17.124 --> 0:03:20.044
<v Speaker 2>him say, hey, we make these loans. If there's even

0:03:20.084 --> 0:03:23.324
<v Speaker 2>a mild downturn in crypto prices, which there is all

0:03:23.364 --> 0:03:26.884
<v Speaker 2>the time, then we're fucked. And he said, I don't care.

0:03:27.164 --> 0:03:32.284
<v Speaker 2>It's positive expected value because he thought, you know so

0:03:32.484 --> 0:03:36.924
<v Speaker 2>usually when people calculate expected value poke players and the like,

0:03:38.044 --> 0:03:41.164
<v Speaker 2>they are assigning some weight to the risk of ruin. Right.

0:03:41.244 --> 0:03:44.804
<v Speaker 2>The Kelly criteria is a gambling formula says, let's say

0:03:44.844 --> 0:03:48.644
<v Speaker 2>I want to bet on the Packers Chiefs game this weekend?

0:03:48.844 --> 0:03:51.004
<v Speaker 2>How much should I bet given my edge as a

0:03:51.004 --> 0:03:53.284
<v Speaker 2>share of my bank roll, and basically tells you how

0:03:53.284 --> 0:03:56.324
<v Speaker 2>to maximize your return without having any chance of going

0:03:56.324 --> 0:03:57.244
<v Speaker 2>truly broke.

0:03:57.444 --> 0:03:59.924
<v Speaker 1>Now, and by the way, let's just caveat that a

0:03:59.964 --> 0:04:02.884
<v Speaker 1>little bit, because we know and you've written about the

0:04:02.884 --> 0:04:06.124
<v Speaker 1>fact that the Kelly criterion might actually not be the

0:04:06.164 --> 0:04:08.564
<v Speaker 1>best way to do this if you actually want to avoid.

0:04:08.364 --> 0:04:11.204
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it assumes you know your edge, and if you

0:04:11.244 --> 0:04:13.604
<v Speaker 2>know your edge, then well that's wonderful, But that's not

0:04:13.724 --> 0:04:15.604
<v Speaker 2>how real sports betting works. Most of the time, you're

0:04:15.684 --> 0:04:18.684
<v Speaker 2>estimating your edge, and most gamblers, even smart gamblers, tend

0:04:18.724 --> 0:04:23.124
<v Speaker 2>to overestimate. So therefore most most gambles have learned through

0:04:23.124 --> 0:04:25.844
<v Speaker 2>time that you want to have half Kelly, or a

0:04:25.924 --> 0:04:29.644
<v Speaker 2>quarter Kelly, even a full Kelly bet intuitively, to most

0:04:29.684 --> 0:04:34.364
<v Speaker 2>gamblers looks very aggressive. You could have yourself betting fifteen

0:04:34.364 --> 0:04:36.604
<v Speaker 2>percent of your entire bankroll on one game where you

0:04:36.684 --> 0:04:37.604
<v Speaker 2>have only a small.

0:04:37.444 --> 0:04:41.084
<v Speaker 1>Edge, for example, And to gambler like SBF, though the

0:04:41.164 --> 0:04:44.604
<v Speaker 1>Kelly criterion criterion was aggressive enough, it was for.

0:04:44.604 --> 0:04:47.364
<v Speaker 2>Wins because what it doesn't do is tell you how

0:04:47.364 --> 0:04:50.404
<v Speaker 2>to maximize your expected value if you don't care about

0:04:50.404 --> 0:04:53.684
<v Speaker 2>going broke. In the book, I ran some simulations where

0:04:53.724 --> 0:04:56.964
<v Speaker 2>you bet five x Kelly instead of point five Kelly,

0:04:58.364 --> 0:05:00.444
<v Speaker 2>and what happens is that ninety nine percent of the

0:05:00.484 --> 0:05:03.324
<v Speaker 2>time where the course of similar an NFL season, you

0:05:03.404 --> 0:05:06.044
<v Speaker 2>go broke, but one percent of the time you wind

0:05:06.124 --> 0:05:08.644
<v Speaker 2>up with more money than Elon Musk yep.

0:05:08.884 --> 0:05:12.044
<v Speaker 1>And that's why you have positive expected value.

0:05:12.204 --> 0:05:15.484
<v Speaker 2>Right. So having a one in one thousand chance of

0:05:16.284 --> 0:05:18.564
<v Speaker 2>earning two hundred and twenty five billion from a ten

0:05:18.644 --> 0:05:22.204
<v Speaker 2>thousand dollars starting bankroll, whatever simulations we made, right, is

0:05:22.364 --> 0:05:24.524
<v Speaker 2>very plus ev if you don't care about the fact

0:05:24.564 --> 0:05:27.164
<v Speaker 2>that you are in debtors prison the other ninety pet

0:05:27.204 --> 0:05:27.844
<v Speaker 2>nine percent.

0:05:27.644 --> 0:05:30.564
<v Speaker 1>Of the exactly. So, so PSA, for our listeners, do

0:05:30.644 --> 0:05:32.724
<v Speaker 1>not try this at home. The one person who did

0:05:32.884 --> 0:05:36.084
<v Speaker 1>is currently in prison for twenty years.

0:05:37.124 --> 0:05:40.444
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, So SBF was aware of the risks they

0:05:40.444 --> 0:05:43.364
<v Speaker 2>were taking and kind of like was ll kind of

0:05:43.404 --> 0:05:47.004
<v Speaker 2>like shrugging them off, right, you know, was aware of

0:05:47.004 --> 0:05:49.204
<v Speaker 2>the mechanism by which these traits are occurring, which is

0:05:49.204 --> 0:05:51.764
<v Speaker 2>that you open up a floodball or a floodgate between

0:05:52.604 --> 0:05:57.244
<v Speaker 2>the customer funds secured as Alameda and you know, money

0:05:57.284 --> 0:06:00.284
<v Speaker 2>that they were then trading with and making bets on

0:06:00.404 --> 0:06:03.244
<v Speaker 2>shit coins and other things. You know, this is the

0:06:03.284 --> 0:06:05.044
<v Speaker 2>part where Sam, when I talked to him, would get

0:06:05.044 --> 0:06:09.044
<v Speaker 2>more legalistic about saying, well, technically customer funds were wired

0:06:09.084 --> 0:06:12.804
<v Speaker 2>to X and why and you know, I I you

0:06:12.844 --> 0:06:15.564
<v Speaker 2>know the jury didn't buy his bullshit, and so I don't.

0:06:15.884 --> 0:06:18.084
<v Speaker 2>I don't really either. But they were knowingly taking customer

0:06:18.084 --> 0:06:22.484
<v Speaker 2>funds and making what Sam knew to be really risky bets,

0:06:22.604 --> 0:06:28.684
<v Speaker 2>and Ellison was uh was aware of this and trying

0:06:28.724 --> 0:06:32.324
<v Speaker 2>to present these risks to Sam. Now we should say

0:06:33.724 --> 0:06:39.764
<v Speaker 2>she is a government witness. Uh do you sign a

0:06:39.844 --> 0:06:40.324
<v Speaker 2>plea deal?

0:06:40.404 --> 0:06:40.564
<v Speaker 1>Right?

0:06:40.604 --> 0:06:43.324
<v Speaker 2>And that means that you're gonna be presented in a

0:06:43.364 --> 0:06:47.924
<v Speaker 2>favorable light. You know, she kind of presents herself as

0:06:47.964 --> 0:06:51.444
<v Speaker 2>some sheep in the will. Is that the right metaphor

0:06:51.484 --> 0:06:52.124
<v Speaker 2>some I don't know.

0:06:53.564 --> 0:06:55.524
<v Speaker 1>I think I think that's not quite the right metaphor.

0:06:55.564 --> 0:06:58.084
<v Speaker 1>But I think she does present herself as a victim,

0:06:58.524 --> 0:07:01.284
<v Speaker 1>as someone who you know, jumped into the abyss. And

0:07:01.804 --> 0:07:06.604
<v Speaker 1>even the judge referred to the fact that Sam bankfint

0:07:06.644 --> 0:07:10.924
<v Speaker 1>Freed was her kryptonite, right. I was in that analogy

0:07:11.564 --> 0:07:14.444
<v Speaker 1>she would be Superman if he's if he's kryptonite, right,

0:07:17.324 --> 0:07:19.884
<v Speaker 1>people really screw that analogy up. I just want to

0:07:19.924 --> 0:07:24.924
<v Speaker 1>point that out. But but yes, she presented herself as

0:07:24.924 --> 0:07:28.444
<v Speaker 1>a victim, as someone who knew it was wrong but

0:07:28.844 --> 0:07:31.604
<v Speaker 1>did it anyway and then couldn't see straight because she

0:07:32.004 --> 0:07:36.044
<v Speaker 1>you know, her professional life and her private life were

0:07:36.084 --> 0:07:41.364
<v Speaker 1>too deeply intertwined. You know, she and she basically was

0:07:41.564 --> 0:07:44.284
<v Speaker 1>upon So I don't know, I don't know what the

0:07:44.284 --> 0:07:46.924
<v Speaker 1>sheep metaphor here would be. It's not a wolf in

0:07:46.964 --> 0:07:51.284
<v Speaker 1>sheep's clothing. That would be SBF, I think. But she, Yeah,

0:07:51.364 --> 0:07:53.884
<v Speaker 1>she is someone who was maybe a lamb.

0:07:53.964 --> 0:07:56.564
<v Speaker 2>Haircut, was a little was a little sheep like I

0:07:56.604 --> 0:07:57.644
<v Speaker 2>suppose it was.

0:07:57.724 --> 0:08:00.604
<v Speaker 1>It was lamb to the slaughter. I don't know. I'm trying.

0:08:00.644 --> 0:08:03.204
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to take all my metaphors out here.

0:08:03.604 --> 0:08:06.244
<v Speaker 2>I mean. One of the thing about FTX is that

0:08:06.404 --> 0:08:14.644
<v Speaker 2>like it's very much a cult, like uh company when

0:08:14.644 --> 0:08:17.444
<v Speaker 2>you go there. I went to the Bahamas after everyone

0:08:17.484 --> 0:08:22.044
<v Speaker 2>except for two FTX employees and Sam's mom and dad

0:08:22.164 --> 0:08:27.084
<v Speaker 2>and Sam himself had had fled. And it's not the

0:08:27.124 --> 0:08:29.564
<v Speaker 2>typical But from the talking to these ex employees, it's

0:08:29.604 --> 0:08:36.084
<v Speaker 2>like not the typical crypto bro finance bro atmosphere. Instead,

0:08:36.124 --> 0:08:41.404
<v Speaker 2>it's like this touchy feely effective altruist. They think they're

0:08:42.164 --> 0:08:44.484
<v Speaker 2>stealing from the rich to I don't know what to

0:08:44.604 --> 0:08:50.484
<v Speaker 2>for Sam's charitable endeavors. They are isolated, right, people. The

0:08:50.484 --> 0:08:54.484
<v Speaker 2>Bahamas is not actually or this part of the Bahamas

0:08:54.524 --> 0:08:58.164
<v Speaker 2>right that they're in on the southwest corner of New

0:08:58.204 --> 0:09:01.284
<v Speaker 2>Providence Island is not party central. You're away from the

0:09:01.284 --> 0:09:05.644
<v Speaker 2>Bahamar and the Atlantis and NASA and the cruise ship docks.

0:09:07.204 --> 0:09:09.084
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, but like, but so there it's kind of

0:09:09.084 --> 0:09:12.604
<v Speaker 2>a cult and like and like, and Sam makes us

0:09:12.644 --> 0:09:15.404
<v Speaker 2>claim that, oh, I'm doing this because I want to eventually,

0:09:16.124 --> 0:09:18.724
<v Speaker 2>you know, accumulate more money, because the marginal utility is

0:09:18.804 --> 0:09:21.804
<v Speaker 2>very high, because I'll donate it to charity, although actually

0:09:21.844 --> 0:09:24.564
<v Speaker 2>he might do things like donate to presidential candidates and

0:09:24.564 --> 0:09:28.484
<v Speaker 2>try to curry influence and favors. But so you have

0:09:28.564 --> 0:09:32.724
<v Speaker 2>true believers, and you know, and she is close to

0:09:32.724 --> 0:09:35.724
<v Speaker 2>this inner circle. You know one thing, clearly, Sam is

0:09:36.084 --> 0:09:40.804
<v Speaker 2>smart enough to not share his fraudulent intent widely, right,

0:09:41.604 --> 0:09:43.804
<v Speaker 2>you know, it's inner circle and not much else. Doesn't

0:09:43.844 --> 0:09:47.284
<v Speaker 2>go much further than that. So I don't know. I mean, so,

0:09:47.484 --> 0:09:49.124
<v Speaker 2>how many years did she accept as part of the

0:09:49.124 --> 0:09:49.564
<v Speaker 2>plea deal?

0:09:49.804 --> 0:09:52.284
<v Speaker 1>Two years she just got sentenced to two years she

0:09:52.364 --> 0:09:55.124
<v Speaker 1>had as part of the plea deal. She didn't accept

0:09:55.244 --> 0:09:58.044
<v Speaker 1>anything immediately in the sense that she was still going

0:09:58.124 --> 0:10:02.124
<v Speaker 1>to await sentencing, and her lawyers and actually the prosecutors

0:10:02.164 --> 0:10:05.084
<v Speaker 1>also argued for no prison time because of how much

0:10:05.124 --> 0:10:07.564
<v Speaker 1>she cooperated, but the judge said that, you know, she

0:10:07.564 --> 0:10:09.804
<v Speaker 1>couldn't get it. I think this was literally the quote

0:10:10.164 --> 0:10:12.404
<v Speaker 1>get out of jail Free card. I was like, haha,

0:10:12.524 --> 0:10:15.084
<v Speaker 1>I cannot believe you just said that, but yes, that

0:10:15.484 --> 0:10:18.044
<v Speaker 1>is what happened. So she was sentenced to two years.

0:10:18.364 --> 0:10:22.484
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I think it's I think talking about

0:10:22.604 --> 0:10:29.484
<v Speaker 1>kind of this type of environment is actually quite interesting

0:10:29.684 --> 0:10:32.964
<v Speaker 1>because you use the word true believer, which we've used

0:10:32.964 --> 0:10:35.524
<v Speaker 1>on the show in the past when we're talking about

0:10:35.884 --> 0:10:39.444
<v Speaker 1>con artists, and the mark of a true believer is

0:10:39.524 --> 0:10:43.164
<v Speaker 1>you don't like, you don't know right that you're committing fraud,

0:10:43.324 --> 0:10:45.364
<v Speaker 1>like you actually believe in this and you believe it's

0:10:45.364 --> 0:10:47.084
<v Speaker 1>the right thing to do. And what you were just

0:10:47.124 --> 0:10:49.844
<v Speaker 1>talking about, Caroline knew she was what she was doing right,

0:10:49.964 --> 0:10:51.644
<v Speaker 1>She knew that it was wrong, she knew what the

0:10:51.724 --> 0:10:54.364
<v Speaker 1>risk of ruin was, she knew that this was defrauding,

0:10:54.724 --> 0:10:57.764
<v Speaker 1>but she felt, you know, her loyalty was such that

0:10:57.844 --> 0:11:01.404
<v Speaker 1>she did it anyway. So I think that we can't

0:11:01.444 --> 0:11:03.684
<v Speaker 1>call her a true believer, right, We can't call her

0:11:03.804 --> 0:11:07.324
<v Speaker 1>like a true brainwashed cult victim because she knew this

0:11:07.524 --> 0:11:10.124
<v Speaker 1>was wrong and she did it anyway. I think we

0:11:10.164 --> 0:11:13.004
<v Speaker 1>can still give her some sort of She's one of

0:11:13.004 --> 0:11:15.044
<v Speaker 1>these people who's kind of in between, because I think

0:11:15.044 --> 0:11:18.084
<v Speaker 1>she has some characteristics of victim, right. And I think

0:11:18.124 --> 0:11:20.764
<v Speaker 1>that the cult environment is really interesting because it makes

0:11:20.804 --> 0:11:26.004
<v Speaker 1>dissent much less likely. It means that even if you're

0:11:26.044 --> 0:11:28.124
<v Speaker 1>not a true believer, but everyone around you kind of

0:11:28.204 --> 0:11:29.964
<v Speaker 1>is because they don't know the full extent of it.

0:11:30.724 --> 0:11:33.284
<v Speaker 1>Then that kind of influences you as well, and you

0:11:33.324 --> 0:11:37.684
<v Speaker 1>start thinking, maybe I'm wrong right, maybe this isn't fraud, etcetera, etcetera, etcetera.

0:11:37.724 --> 0:11:40.084
<v Speaker 1>You start trying to convince yourself. But on the other hand,

0:11:40.124 --> 0:11:42.284
<v Speaker 1>because she knew it, I think she was also a perpetrator.

0:11:42.804 --> 0:11:45.884
<v Speaker 1>Instead of whistleblowing, instead of leaving, instead of going to

0:11:45.884 --> 0:11:48.884
<v Speaker 1>the authorities, she did it anyway, And so I think

0:11:48.924 --> 0:11:51.884
<v Speaker 1>that it's I'm totally on board with giving her a

0:11:51.964 --> 0:11:56.604
<v Speaker 1>lighter sentence because given the testimony, like, given what she did,

0:11:56.644 --> 0:11:59.804
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's absolutely correct, and I do see

0:11:59.804 --> 0:12:02.324
<v Speaker 1>that there are elements of victimhood there. Like I'm not

0:12:02.364 --> 0:12:05.964
<v Speaker 1>blaming her, I'm not giving her a complete you know,

0:12:06.004 --> 0:12:08.404
<v Speaker 1>saying oh no, she's a horrible person, and she does

0:12:08.444 --> 0:12:12.164
<v Speaker 1>seem very unlike SBF. She seems to be to feel

0:12:12.204 --> 0:12:14.524
<v Speaker 1>really really bad, or at least she's a very good

0:12:14.564 --> 0:12:17.924
<v Speaker 1>actor and saying that she feels really really bad and

0:12:17.964 --> 0:12:21.284
<v Speaker 1>that's completely absent in what he's doing. In fact, he's

0:12:21.324 --> 0:12:24.044
<v Speaker 1>appealing his sentence, right. He said that the judge was

0:12:24.084 --> 0:12:26.764
<v Speaker 1>biased and that he deserves to not be in jail

0:12:26.804 --> 0:12:30.924
<v Speaker 1>at all. And she seems to be kind of I

0:12:30.924 --> 0:12:32.564
<v Speaker 1>don't know if at piece is the right word, but

0:12:32.844 --> 0:12:34.964
<v Speaker 1>she seems to have accepted that, like, she did bad

0:12:35.164 --> 0:12:37.004
<v Speaker 1>and she deserves to be punished.

0:12:37.764 --> 0:12:39.404
<v Speaker 2>I'm trying to remember the reporting. I think it was

0:12:39.524 --> 0:12:44.204
<v Speaker 2>from the Michael Lewis book. But she apparently felt like

0:12:44.244 --> 0:12:48.404
<v Speaker 2>a great sense of relief once she realized that they

0:12:48.444 --> 0:12:52.324
<v Speaker 2>were fucked, because they were fucked sooner ear late. I mean,

0:12:52.324 --> 0:12:54.844
<v Speaker 2>even when I talked to me, Sam was kind of like, well,

0:12:54.844 --> 0:12:56.164
<v Speaker 2>we could have played out the string for a few

0:12:56.164 --> 0:12:58.084
<v Speaker 2>more months and then you never know what happens, right,

0:12:59.444 --> 0:13:03.444
<v Speaker 2>But she knew when she realized they were fucked. She's like, Okay,

0:13:03.524 --> 0:13:07.164
<v Speaker 2>finally this has an ending. I mean, I don't know

0:13:07.164 --> 0:13:09.724
<v Speaker 2>about the by the way, just to remind you if

0:13:09.724 --> 0:13:11.684
<v Speaker 2>you just I mean she was sleeping with her boss too,

0:13:11.724 --> 0:13:12.524
<v Speaker 2>where he was sleeping with you?

0:13:12.604 --> 0:13:14.604
<v Speaker 1>Yes she was, yes, yes, yes they were. They were

0:13:14.604 --> 0:13:17.164
<v Speaker 1>part of a relationship. I think it was even like

0:13:17.204 --> 0:13:20.364
<v Speaker 1>a polycule, right, it wasn't just a if I.

0:13:20.324 --> 0:13:23.644
<v Speaker 2>Remember correctly heard of the story. I didn't care to

0:13:23.844 --> 0:13:28.044
<v Speaker 2>investigate that much. I don't really want to picture certain things.

0:13:29.964 --> 0:13:31.924
<v Speaker 1>But I don't blame in it. I don't blame you.

0:13:33.124 --> 0:13:36.684
<v Speaker 2>I mean, isn't the game theory such that, like, isn't

0:13:36.724 --> 0:13:39.004
<v Speaker 2>it aren't we giving people too many incentives to be

0:13:39.044 --> 0:13:42.044
<v Speaker 2>cooperating witnesses or not? What's the expected value? You know

0:13:42.044 --> 0:13:44.324
<v Speaker 2>what I mean of committing fraud? If like, if you're

0:13:44.324 --> 0:13:47.404
<v Speaker 2>not the principle, Oh now two years, ay, not so bad,

0:13:47.644 --> 0:13:48.924
<v Speaker 2>not so bad? Two years.

0:13:48.924 --> 0:13:50.924
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's so funny that you say that, because I

0:13:50.964 --> 0:13:53.084
<v Speaker 1>actually read an analysis and thought I was like, no,

0:13:53.164 --> 0:13:55.804
<v Speaker 1>this isn't this analysis as fucked, This isn't true at all.

0:13:55.844 --> 0:13:57.644
<v Speaker 1>They're like, she got two years. This is going to

0:13:57.684 --> 0:14:00.324
<v Speaker 1>mean that no one's ever going to cooperate, because like

0:14:00.364 --> 0:14:03.284
<v Speaker 1>she should have just gotten off free. Like if you cooperate,

0:14:03.324 --> 0:14:05.004
<v Speaker 1>you shouldn't get any jail time. And I was like,

0:14:05.044 --> 0:14:07.924
<v Speaker 1>eh no, I don't think that's right. Like, if you

0:14:08.164 --> 0:14:12.724
<v Speaker 1>are conspiring to defraud people out of eight billion dollars,

0:14:12.804 --> 0:14:14.364
<v Speaker 1>like that's you know, with a B, that's a lot

0:14:14.364 --> 0:14:17.684
<v Speaker 1>of money, unless you end up in the one percent

0:14:17.684 --> 0:14:20.244
<v Speaker 1>of the simulation where you have more money than Elon Musk.

0:14:20.524 --> 0:14:23.404
<v Speaker 1>But in the other ninety nine point nine percent, you know,

0:14:23.524 --> 0:14:25.484
<v Speaker 1>the eight billion is a lot of money.

0:14:25.724 --> 0:14:28.404
<v Speaker 2>And so about just one second prison time for every

0:14:28.564 --> 0:14:30.044
<v Speaker 2>dollar you see, it's not too bad.

0:14:30.404 --> 0:14:32.564
<v Speaker 1>One second. I can't do that math? How long is

0:14:32.564 --> 0:14:35.484
<v Speaker 1>that going to be? Long?

0:14:35.604 --> 0:14:38.044
<v Speaker 2>Look? I don't know. I look, I'm not good at math,

0:14:38.164 --> 0:14:40.804
<v Speaker 2>and people like I'm good at math. I have to like, yeah,

0:14:40.844 --> 0:14:42.004
<v Speaker 2>I have taculate, same with.

0:14:41.964 --> 0:14:45.084
<v Speaker 1>Me, same with me. But anyway, Yeah, I think she's

0:14:45.124 --> 0:14:48.644
<v Speaker 1>getting off a little bit light. Other people think that

0:14:48.684 --> 0:14:52.804
<v Speaker 1>she's not getting off light enough. And I do think

0:14:52.844 --> 0:14:55.004
<v Speaker 1>that it's a really interesting I think your question is

0:14:55.004 --> 0:14:57.804
<v Speaker 1>a really really interesting one. What's the game theory here?

0:14:58.124 --> 0:14:58.284
<v Speaker 2>Right?

0:14:58.324 --> 0:15:01.844
<v Speaker 1>What's the game theory on fraud on trying to do

0:15:01.924 --> 0:15:04.604
<v Speaker 1>these sorts of things. If you look at SBF and

0:15:04.604 --> 0:15:06.204
<v Speaker 1>you're like, okay, you're going to jail for at least

0:15:06.204 --> 0:15:08.644
<v Speaker 1>twenty years, like that doesn't seem very good.

0:15:09.004 --> 0:15:10.884
<v Speaker 2>But like I mean, this is this is literally the

0:15:10.884 --> 0:15:11.764
<v Speaker 2>prisoners to let.

0:15:11.724 --> 0:15:15.644
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it actually literally is the prisoners yes to uh

0:15:15.644 --> 0:15:17.764
<v Speaker 1>are we going to except they were allowed to communicate

0:15:17.804 --> 0:15:21.124
<v Speaker 1>because they weren't isolated from each other right away, right okay? Yeah,

0:15:21.164 --> 0:15:23.644
<v Speaker 1>but otherwise otherwise it was the.

0:15:23.364 --> 0:15:26.724
<v Speaker 2>Two hundred and fifty three years for that's a lot

0:15:26.724 --> 0:15:29.604
<v Speaker 2>of that's a lot of seconds. We need to live

0:15:29.644 --> 0:15:31.404
<v Speaker 2>a lot of seconds cheap. That means we need to

0:15:31.404 --> 0:15:34.804
<v Speaker 2>live like three billion seconds and that's a fucking lot.

0:15:34.844 --> 0:15:36.764
<v Speaker 2>I'm wasting more seconds from now on. I didn't know

0:15:36.924 --> 0:15:41.724
<v Speaker 2>that made it burn? Yeah, No, And the game theory

0:15:42.004 --> 0:15:45.604
<v Speaker 2>of the prisoner's lema says that you ultimately do snitch

0:15:46.084 --> 0:15:50.324
<v Speaker 2>in your partner. Yeah, it's too hard to maintain and confidence. Yeah,

0:15:50.364 --> 0:15:51.084
<v Speaker 2>and she did.

0:15:51.284 --> 0:15:55.084
<v Speaker 1>And she did, and that's but this was one of

0:15:55.084 --> 0:15:58.404
<v Speaker 1>those cases. It's actually really interesting. The game theory changes

0:15:58.484 --> 0:16:01.564
<v Speaker 1>depending on how much evidence there is, right, Like, it's

0:16:01.604 --> 0:16:03.244
<v Speaker 1>one of these if you have two prisoners and they

0:16:03.284 --> 0:16:08.004
<v Speaker 1>don't actually have anything on you and they need the confession,

0:16:08.404 --> 0:16:11.044
<v Speaker 1>then it's very different from we have reams of data

0:16:11.164 --> 0:16:13.924
<v Speaker 1>and we actually know, you know, we'll be able to

0:16:14.084 --> 0:16:16.284
<v Speaker 1>trace the finances, and we'll be able to catch you anyway,

0:16:16.284 --> 0:16:19.004
<v Speaker 1>and if you cooperate, maybe it'll be less time. And

0:16:19.084 --> 0:16:21.524
<v Speaker 1>I believe, and Nate correct me if I'm wrong, because

0:16:21.524 --> 0:16:23.564
<v Speaker 1>you know a lot more about this case than I do.

0:16:23.804 --> 0:16:26.164
<v Speaker 1>I believe that they did have enough evidence where even

0:16:26.204 --> 0:16:28.444
<v Speaker 1>without Caroline, they would have been able to have a

0:16:28.444 --> 0:16:29.284
<v Speaker 1>pretty strong case.

0:16:30.924 --> 0:16:33.044
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, I think I think she was the

0:16:33.124 --> 0:16:35.044
<v Speaker 2>key witness, but like they I mean, they had more

0:16:35.084 --> 0:16:37.044
<v Speaker 2>evidence than they really needed.

0:16:37.364 --> 0:16:38.964
<v Speaker 1>And they had two other witnesses. By the way, there

0:16:38.964 --> 0:16:43.524
<v Speaker 1>were three Topic executives who ended up turning and testifying

0:16:43.524 --> 0:16:44.364
<v Speaker 1>against SBF.

0:16:45.484 --> 0:16:47.204
<v Speaker 2>By the way, the story does have a happy ending.

0:16:47.364 --> 0:16:50.324
<v Speaker 2>It looks as though most of the defrauded people will

0:16:50.324 --> 0:16:55.324
<v Speaker 2>get their money back with interest, in part because some

0:16:55.484 --> 0:16:58.684
<v Speaker 2>things that FTX did have gone well, so they invested

0:16:58.724 --> 0:17:01.724
<v Speaker 2>in Anthropic, the AI company. And also you've seen a

0:17:01.764 --> 0:17:06.004
<v Speaker 2>big rise in crypto prices since the bankruptcy.

0:17:06.124 --> 0:17:07.684
<v Speaker 1>Oh that's good. I didn't realize that.

0:17:08.884 --> 0:17:12.244
<v Speaker 2>Good for them, poker, good for the poker economy. Let's

0:17:12.364 --> 0:17:15.084
<v Speaker 2>pump that crypto back into some high rollers.

0:17:15.124 --> 0:17:19.244
<v Speaker 1>Okay, guys, absolutely, let's do it. But yeah, I think

0:17:19.284 --> 0:17:21.964
<v Speaker 1>I think the bottom line here is that like Caroline is.

0:17:22.244 --> 0:17:25.404
<v Speaker 1>You know, SBF is to me, like not not particularly

0:17:26.004 --> 0:17:28.804
<v Speaker 1>complex to kind of talk about in the sense of

0:17:28.844 --> 0:17:32.004
<v Speaker 1>like was he a con artist? We have talked about that,

0:17:32.284 --> 0:17:34.444
<v Speaker 1>you know, we think I think he was, and like,

0:17:34.764 --> 0:17:37.604
<v Speaker 1>you know, he clearly knew exactly what he was doing.

0:17:37.844 --> 0:17:39.924
<v Speaker 1>Caroline knew what she was doing. But I do think

0:17:39.924 --> 0:17:43.964
<v Speaker 1>that she is Probably she's a more complex character here

0:17:44.004 --> 0:17:46.644
<v Speaker 1>because you do also have the power dynamic, you have

0:17:46.724 --> 0:17:49.684
<v Speaker 1>the sexual dynamic, you have all sorts of things going on.

0:17:53.244 --> 0:17:55.364
<v Speaker 2>You want to talk some politics, Maria.

0:17:55.524 --> 0:17:57.844
<v Speaker 1>I do want to talk some politics, Nate, and let's

0:17:57.884 --> 0:18:14.844
<v Speaker 1>do that after the break. We are now one week

0:18:15.204 --> 0:18:18.084
<v Speaker 1>closer to the election, and I know, I know that

0:18:18.124 --> 0:18:20.404
<v Speaker 1>sounds dramatic, but I mean it's it's getting you know,

0:18:20.404 --> 0:18:23.524
<v Speaker 1>it's getting close, right, We're we're almost are we in October? Yet?

0:18:23.684 --> 0:18:26.284
<v Speaker 1>What day is it? Is it October first? Today? It's Tuesday.

0:18:26.804 --> 0:18:29.764
<v Speaker 2>It's October, which means that I'm late on the monthly

0:18:29.964 --> 0:18:31.684
<v Speaker 2>paid subscriber newsletter post.

0:18:31.884 --> 0:18:34.844
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, nay, as a paid as a paid subscriber,

0:18:34.964 --> 0:18:37.644
<v Speaker 1>I'm livid. I'm so mad that you're late on this post.

0:18:37.764 --> 0:18:41.444
<v Speaker 2>They took away the thirty first Oh no, September doesn't

0:18:41.484 --> 0:18:43.564
<v Speaker 2>September seem like it should be thirty one?

0:18:43.644 --> 0:18:46.364
<v Speaker 1>It actually it actually does seem that way. But I

0:18:46.484 --> 0:18:48.244
<v Speaker 1>and you know what, I never remember. I actually have

0:18:48.284 --> 0:18:50.124
<v Speaker 1>to do the little rhyme. Did you ever learn that

0:18:50.124 --> 0:18:53.684
<v Speaker 1>little rhyme in school? Can I do do that? Yeah? Yeah,

0:18:53.684 --> 0:18:55.244
<v Speaker 1>I do the finger thing, but I also have my

0:18:55.284 --> 0:18:58.164
<v Speaker 1>little rhyme. Thirty days has September, April, June, and November

0:18:58.444 --> 0:18:59.484
<v Speaker 1>all thirty one?

0:18:59.524 --> 0:19:03.204
<v Speaker 2>What month shouldn't have a thirty first day? Should we

0:19:03.244 --> 0:19:04.044
<v Speaker 2>give to September?

0:19:05.284 --> 0:19:10.204
<v Speaker 1>I say, I would say, I would say either say.

0:19:10.044 --> 0:19:14.564
<v Speaker 2>November or yeah, let's get rid of that November.

0:19:14.644 --> 0:19:15.964
<v Speaker 1>November is a pretty shitty life.

0:19:16.084 --> 0:19:20.324
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, November is thirty one. Yeah, November should be thirty.

0:19:21.044 --> 0:19:23.124
<v Speaker 1>Wait, no, does November have thirty? November has thirty? I

0:19:23.164 --> 0:19:25.684
<v Speaker 1>just gave my rim. Thirty days has September, April, JUNEA, November.

0:19:25.764 --> 0:19:28.284
<v Speaker 1>November already has thirty. I hate November so much that

0:19:28.364 --> 0:19:29.964
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to subtract yet another one.

0:19:30.084 --> 0:19:33.484
<v Speaker 2>All right, okay, November has twenty nine days now?

0:19:35.484 --> 0:19:39.244
<v Speaker 1>All right, November has twenty nine days. September has thirty one. Done, guys,

0:19:39.244 --> 0:19:41.604
<v Speaker 1>we've made your life so much better this is. This

0:19:41.684 --> 0:19:43.524
<v Speaker 1>is what you come to us for. This is the

0:19:43.564 --> 0:19:44.404
<v Speaker 1>hard hitting news.

0:19:44.604 --> 0:19:47.044
<v Speaker 2>Tuesday, September thirty, first edition.

0:19:46.964 --> 0:19:53.124
<v Speaker 1>Of Risky Business. But okay, let's let's get to it.

0:19:53.164 --> 0:19:57.964
<v Speaker 1>We're in October, we're getting close. What's going on? Has

0:19:57.964 --> 0:20:01.364
<v Speaker 1>anything changed? And then let's talk about, you know, what

0:20:01.444 --> 0:20:04.244
<v Speaker 1>people can be doing in this lead up where we're

0:20:04.524 --> 0:20:07.164
<v Speaker 1>now like weeks away from the actual election.

0:20:08.084 --> 0:20:12.244
<v Speaker 2>So not very much has changed. Kamala Harris has a

0:20:12.764 --> 0:20:16.204
<v Speaker 2>three point lead roughly in national polls. She is ahead

0:20:16.244 --> 0:20:19.724
<v Speaker 2>by about a point in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan. She's

0:20:19.764 --> 0:20:25.364
<v Speaker 2>behind by about a point in Georgia, Arizona, she's tied

0:20:25.684 --> 0:20:28.524
<v Speaker 2>nets ahead by a pointer. So Nevada in North Carolina

0:20:30.124 --> 0:20:32.924
<v Speaker 2>about about a tie, big hurricane. The more important thing

0:20:32.964 --> 0:20:40.324
<v Speaker 2>is Nevada. Nevada is there like the silver state. I

0:20:40.324 --> 0:20:41.244
<v Speaker 2>can just say the silver state.

0:20:41.324 --> 0:20:46.364
<v Speaker 1>Silver. There you go, yeah, so please continue.

0:20:47.164 --> 0:20:49.324
<v Speaker 2>All that works out to basically a toss up if

0:20:49.364 --> 0:20:51.804
<v Speaker 2>you want to play the percentages, we have Harris at

0:20:51.844 --> 0:20:55.764
<v Speaker 2>blue a fifty five point one percent chance I win

0:20:55.844 --> 0:21:00.084
<v Speaker 2>the electoral College as of this morning, Trump forty four

0:21:00.084 --> 0:21:04.284
<v Speaker 2>point seven dead heat a tie zero point three percent.

0:21:04.804 --> 0:21:07.284
<v Speaker 2>Uh like hitting I don't know what bet is three

0:21:07.364 --> 0:21:09.684
<v Speaker 2>hundred one. I was gonna say, like hitting the double

0:21:09.764 --> 0:21:11.604
<v Speaker 2>zero space in your life, but that's much more likely

0:21:11.604 --> 0:21:18.004
<v Speaker 2>than op point three percent. Yeah, so look, I think

0:21:18.044 --> 0:21:22.444
<v Speaker 2>if the election were held today, then you'd slightly rather

0:21:22.524 --> 0:21:28.164
<v Speaker 2>be Harris. She is uh ahead in nominally enough states

0:21:28.204 --> 0:21:34.684
<v Speaker 2>to win two hundred and seventy six electoral votes, including Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania,

0:21:34.684 --> 0:21:40.324
<v Speaker 2>and the Silver state Nevada. Is it Nevada or Nevada? Nevada?

0:21:40.324 --> 0:21:40.844
<v Speaker 1>Nevada?

0:21:41.684 --> 0:21:44.244
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so it's not Sierra Nevada. That's it's not the

0:21:44.244 --> 0:21:52.844
<v Speaker 2>fancy Nevada. Oh boy, Nevada is a pretty word, it is.

0:21:52.924 --> 0:21:55.244
<v Speaker 1>I actually prefer Nevada, but I will.

0:21:55.324 --> 0:21:57.684
<v Speaker 2>There's this really good substack post where they rate the

0:21:57.764 --> 0:22:00.404
<v Speaker 2>state names, and like, most state names are pretty fucking good.

0:22:00.404 --> 0:22:02.484
<v Speaker 2>You know, a great name is what California? What a

0:22:02.484 --> 0:22:03.164
<v Speaker 2>great fucking.

0:22:03.004 --> 0:22:05.724
<v Speaker 1>Name it is? It is? It really does give you

0:22:05.844 --> 0:22:10.644
<v Speaker 1>promises of you know, beauty and sunshine. Californ rolls off.

0:22:11.564 --> 0:22:13.764
<v Speaker 2>What's the worst state name according to subsect post.

0:22:14.004 --> 0:22:14.444
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:22:15.244 --> 0:22:19.804
<v Speaker 2>Iowa, Okay, think about it. There aren't that many bad

0:22:19.844 --> 0:22:22.644
<v Speaker 2>state names. Yeah, if I mean, you know, a low

0:22:22.684 --> 0:22:27.084
<v Speaker 2>key bad state name is Washington, Like, I mean, yeah, maybe,

0:22:27.124 --> 0:22:30.884
<v Speaker 2>I mean, come on, wonderful state. Yeah, yeah, you're way far.

0:22:31.284 --> 0:22:34.684
<v Speaker 2>You create confusion with Washington DC. You weren't even part

0:22:34.684 --> 0:22:38.444
<v Speaker 2>of the Republic when Washington was president. I mean, come on, right, Like,

0:22:38.524 --> 0:22:39.084
<v Speaker 2>let's pick.

0:22:39.004 --> 0:22:43.244
<v Speaker 1>It's also you're right, and the level of creativity there

0:22:43.284 --> 0:22:45.804
<v Speaker 1>has really just like gone down. Why did we Why

0:22:45.804 --> 0:22:47.884
<v Speaker 1>did we have to go for Washington. I'd like to

0:22:47.924 --> 0:22:49.724
<v Speaker 1>know the history of this because I love Washington. I

0:22:49.764 --> 0:22:53.644
<v Speaker 1>think it's such a gorgeous state. So other than state names,

0:22:53.964 --> 0:22:57.564
<v Speaker 1>I do think something that you said kind of gets

0:22:57.604 --> 0:22:59.604
<v Speaker 1>into one of the one of the topics that we

0:22:59.644 --> 0:23:02.204
<v Speaker 1>wanted to cover today, which is what actually matters. So

0:23:02.244 --> 0:23:05.604
<v Speaker 1>we've had some pretty severe storms right over the last

0:23:06.524 --> 0:23:11.004
<v Speaker 1>week with a lot of destruction. The death toll keeps rising.

0:23:11.324 --> 0:23:16.404
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's really horrific. Do things like that in

0:23:16.484 --> 0:23:18.644
<v Speaker 1>the lead up I'm not talking like a year ago,

0:23:18.924 --> 0:23:21.404
<v Speaker 1>right Does the fact that this is happening right now?

0:23:21.844 --> 0:23:25.084
<v Speaker 1>Do events like that actually matter when it comes to

0:23:26.044 --> 0:23:30.804
<v Speaker 1>the election outcomes? Does the response matter, like what's actually

0:23:30.844 --> 0:23:31.724
<v Speaker 1>important or not?

0:23:32.764 --> 0:23:35.044
<v Speaker 2>Well, clearly the candidates think it matters because there's a

0:23:35.084 --> 0:23:39.604
<v Speaker 2>lot of posturing over you know, Trump, as he is

0:23:39.924 --> 0:23:44.004
<v Speaker 2>inclined to do, is saying some things that seem exaggerated

0:23:44.044 --> 0:23:46.884
<v Speaker 2>according to the fact checkers. No, but like he's he's

0:23:46.884 --> 0:23:49.084
<v Speaker 2>saying that why isn't Biden going there and why's he

0:23:49.124 --> 0:23:51.924
<v Speaker 2>holding up relieve But the Hairris Biden administration, Biden Hairs

0:23:51.964 --> 0:23:55.564
<v Speaker 2>administration has approved relief funds and they're trying to get

0:23:55.604 --> 0:23:58.284
<v Speaker 2>there and the roads are out and I don't know right,

0:23:58.644 --> 0:24:01.284
<v Speaker 2>So it becomes as kind of like another cable news

0:24:01.324 --> 0:24:03.764
<v Speaker 2>cycle where you just want to tune out. But clearly,

0:24:03.804 --> 0:24:08.004
<v Speaker 2>like I mean, there are precedents. After Hurricane Sandy hit

0:24:08.164 --> 0:24:10.644
<v Speaker 2>New Jersey in the East coast, was in late twenty twelve,

0:24:11.564 --> 0:24:15.124
<v Speaker 2>and the Obama and New York I remember power, it

0:24:15.204 --> 0:24:16.244
<v Speaker 2>was fucking I didn't.

0:24:16.004 --> 0:24:17.924
<v Speaker 1>Have I didn't have sweet, I didn't have power, and

0:24:17.964 --> 0:24:18.924
<v Speaker 1>I didn't have cell service.

0:24:19.004 --> 0:24:20.364
<v Speaker 2>I had to go like back and forth to the

0:24:20.364 --> 0:24:25.004
<v Speaker 2>New York Times building in like this darkened tax anyway. Yeah,

0:24:25.164 --> 0:24:28.164
<v Speaker 2>but like Obama did better in some of these areas

0:24:28.164 --> 0:24:31.684
<v Speaker 2>where the storms had hit. So there's like a bipartisan

0:24:31.724 --> 0:24:33.764
<v Speaker 2>praise for a leader that can be good if it's

0:24:33.804 --> 0:24:37.404
<v Speaker 2>Hurricane Katrina and it's by partisan disputes for how it

0:24:37.524 --> 0:24:39.324
<v Speaker 2>was handled. Right, then that could be bad. I mean

0:24:39.364 --> 0:24:42.524
<v Speaker 2>I researched some papers for this. Uh you know, some

0:24:42.604 --> 0:24:45.164
<v Speaker 2>findings say it tends to help incumbents, which would be

0:24:45.164 --> 0:24:48.164
<v Speaker 2>good for Biden. Some just say it is more polarization,

0:24:48.644 --> 0:24:51.804
<v Speaker 2>that it just increases. You know, Team read thinks that

0:24:51.884 --> 0:24:54.924
<v Speaker 2>Republicans did this well on Team Blue, things Democrats did well,

0:24:54.964 --> 0:24:55.444
<v Speaker 2>et cetera.

0:24:55.924 --> 0:24:57.764
<v Speaker 1>So then it's a kind of in the art.

0:24:58.844 --> 0:25:03.564
<v Speaker 2>I would say, Look in general, Uh, this is a moment,

0:25:03.684 --> 0:25:08.724
<v Speaker 2>natural discessary moment when you appreciate having the government in

0:25:08.764 --> 0:25:10.844
<v Speaker 2>your life. Right at least they don't totally fuck up

0:25:10.884 --> 0:25:12.924
<v Speaker 2>the recovery. So if you're like a little bit a

0:25:12.964 --> 0:25:16.484
<v Speaker 2>little bit of a closet libertarian like me, then like

0:25:16.524 --> 0:25:18.964
<v Speaker 2>when there's a fucking hurricane or a snowstorm, you know,

0:25:18.964 --> 0:25:22.124
<v Speaker 2>like I'm really fucking glad that there are trucks plowing

0:25:22.124 --> 0:25:26.604
<v Speaker 2>the roads and we're not in some libertarian utopia where

0:25:26.644 --> 0:25:28.404
<v Speaker 2>we have to pay for private to trucks or something,

0:25:28.444 --> 0:25:32.364
<v Speaker 2>you know what I mean. So that might be good

0:25:32.364 --> 0:25:35.884
<v Speaker 2>for Democrats. It also raises the salience of climate change.

0:25:35.884 --> 0:25:38.644
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to get into a discussion over which

0:25:38.684 --> 0:25:41.484
<v Speaker 2>hurricanes are caused by climate change or the different effects

0:25:41.524 --> 0:25:44.804
<v Speaker 2>of hurricanes. But you know, you have had more storms

0:25:44.804 --> 0:25:47.844
<v Speaker 2>with this very bad inland flooding. And again I'll leave

0:25:47.884 --> 0:25:50.844
<v Speaker 2>it to the experts to determine how much that is

0:25:50.884 --> 0:25:54.924
<v Speaker 2>because of building patterns versus climate change versus luck basically.

0:25:55.204 --> 0:25:59.884
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, but maybe worth noting that in this particular case. Also,

0:25:59.924 --> 0:26:03.324
<v Speaker 1>North Carolina is a swing state, right so, and Georgia

0:26:03.444 --> 0:26:06.364
<v Speaker 1>was and Georgia was affected as well, and Georgia is

0:26:06.964 --> 0:26:09.604
<v Speaker 1>sorry I forgot your latest update. Georgia is still leaning red.

0:26:10.204 --> 0:26:13.524
<v Speaker 2>By points ahead, by point ish there, point and a

0:26:13.564 --> 0:26:14.364
<v Speaker 2>half maybe.

0:26:14.204 --> 0:26:17.564
<v Speaker 1>Okay, yeah, so this will be interesting. I think. I

0:26:17.604 --> 0:26:19.764
<v Speaker 1>hope people are gathering data on this, and I hope

0:26:19.764 --> 0:26:21.804
<v Speaker 1>that there are some polling going on right now, because

0:26:21.964 --> 0:26:24.524
<v Speaker 1>I'd be very curious because I do think that these

0:26:24.564 --> 0:26:29.004
<v Speaker 1>sorts of events do happen, and will continue happening, and

0:26:29.044 --> 0:26:32.644
<v Speaker 1>will increase in severity. So it is interesting for me

0:26:32.724 --> 0:26:36.644
<v Speaker 1>to see whether they will matter. But now there's obviously

0:26:36.684 --> 0:26:40.684
<v Speaker 1>nothing that we as individuals can do about that, right Like,

0:26:40.764 --> 0:26:44.724
<v Speaker 1>that's you know, the environment. It happens, and here the

0:26:44.804 --> 0:26:48.484
<v Speaker 1>politician's response may or may not matter. But what about

0:26:48.564 --> 0:26:51.724
<v Speaker 1>people on either side of the divide, you know, Trump supporters,

0:26:51.764 --> 0:26:56.124
<v Speaker 1>Hair supporters who want to make sure that they're doing

0:26:56.204 --> 0:26:59.604
<v Speaker 1>everything they can in the run up to try to

0:26:59.644 --> 0:27:01.844
<v Speaker 1>get kind of the voters that may be on the

0:27:01.884 --> 0:27:04.484
<v Speaker 1>fence or undecided or don't know if they're going to

0:27:04.564 --> 0:27:07.444
<v Speaker 1>vote or or what not to actually vote. What matters,

0:27:07.484 --> 0:27:10.404
<v Speaker 1>donations matter, going door to door, does that matter? Do

0:27:10.524 --> 0:27:13.204
<v Speaker 1>any of these things actually make a meaningful difference or

0:27:13.244 --> 0:27:15.164
<v Speaker 1>do they just make us feel a little bit better,

0:27:15.204 --> 0:27:17.364
<v Speaker 1>like recycling, which doesn't actually matter.

0:27:18.524 --> 0:27:23.564
<v Speaker 2>What helps is being a dick on social media really

0:27:23.604 --> 0:27:25.924
<v Speaker 2>helps your candidate wins. So do more. Do more of that.

0:27:26.924 --> 0:27:29.484
<v Speaker 2>By the way, if you want to donate to charity

0:27:29.524 --> 0:27:31.884
<v Speaker 2>to help the people in the Carolinas, et cetera, then

0:27:32.684 --> 0:27:36.044
<v Speaker 2>would recommend charitynavigator dot org gives you a whole list

0:27:36.044 --> 0:27:38.684
<v Speaker 2>of local charities which are usually more effective than That's

0:27:38.724 --> 0:27:40.364
<v Speaker 2>a little affective altruism.

0:27:40.524 --> 0:27:42.924
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's a that's a that's a great recommendation.

0:27:45.284 --> 0:27:50.484
<v Speaker 2>So look, I think that the presidential campaigns have more

0:27:50.524 --> 0:27:52.964
<v Speaker 2>money than they need. And this is not me in

0:27:52.964 --> 0:27:55.484
<v Speaker 2>a crotchety way. It's saying, like, you know, they are

0:27:55.564 --> 0:27:57.084
<v Speaker 2>running all the ads they want to the point where

0:27:57.084 --> 0:27:59.044
<v Speaker 2>the ads have diminishing returns. They have all the field

0:27:59.084 --> 0:28:01.884
<v Speaker 2>staff they want. Maybe if you started out with all

0:28:01.924 --> 0:28:04.004
<v Speaker 2>the money four years ahead of time, you could do

0:28:04.044 --> 0:28:06.524
<v Speaker 2>more ambitious things and so forth. But like they don't

0:28:06.524 --> 0:28:11.684
<v Speaker 2>donate to a presidential campaign, donate to a down ballot campaign.

0:28:11.684 --> 0:28:13.764
<v Speaker 2>Maybe a senate campaigns and campaigns have a lot of

0:28:13.804 --> 0:28:19.284
<v Speaker 2>money too, but you know, us House races, state Supreme

0:28:19.284 --> 0:28:24.764
<v Speaker 2>Court races, state legislature races, right, these are cases where

0:28:25.004 --> 0:28:27.644
<v Speaker 2>where a little bit of money can make more difference.

0:28:27.684 --> 0:28:29.164
<v Speaker 2>By the way, I think in general, I don't think

0:28:29.164 --> 0:28:33.084
<v Speaker 2>that political donations count particularly. I don't mean it like

0:28:33.084 --> 0:28:35.764
<v Speaker 2>a moral way. I think they're probably you know, donate

0:28:35.804 --> 0:28:42.524
<v Speaker 2>to charity instead of a campaign is also a balid strategy.

0:28:43.284 --> 0:28:47.804
<v Speaker 2>Most campaigns believe that door to door canvassing can help

0:28:47.844 --> 0:28:51.684
<v Speaker 2>a bit. One thing that happened in twenty twenty is

0:28:51.724 --> 0:28:57.364
<v Speaker 2>that Democrats were COVID shy and did not do traditional canvassing,

0:28:57.444 --> 0:29:00.684
<v Speaker 2>and lo and behold, Biden underfirms his polls by a

0:29:00.724 --> 0:29:03.124
<v Speaker 2>few points on election day. And I'm not saying it's

0:29:03.124 --> 0:29:05.524
<v Speaker 2>a major cause, but like that may have been a

0:29:05.564 --> 0:29:06.124
<v Speaker 2>mistake in.

0:29:06.524 --> 0:29:10.964
<v Speaker 1>Retrospect, So that's to suggest, because I was about to say,

0:29:10.964 --> 0:29:13.804
<v Speaker 1>are there are there data that suggests that pultiple that

0:29:13.844 --> 0:29:17.764
<v Speaker 1>pultiple that door to door polling and canvassing and all

0:29:17.804 --> 0:29:21.444
<v Speaker 1>of that actually is effective or is it just that

0:29:21.564 --> 0:29:24.484
<v Speaker 1>politicians believe this and it's never been challenged. Do we

0:29:24.484 --> 0:29:25.804
<v Speaker 1>have do we actually have data?

0:29:25.924 --> 0:29:28.364
<v Speaker 2>I think that's more studiable because you can kind of

0:29:28.644 --> 0:29:33.204
<v Speaker 2>it's clearly studyable. I think the academic consensus that it

0:29:33.204 --> 0:29:33.924
<v Speaker 2>does help a little bit.

0:29:33.884 --> 0:29:36.444
<v Speaker 1>Okay, yeah, so on the margin it helps, which is important,

0:29:36.484 --> 0:29:39.044
<v Speaker 1>right because right now we're looking for on the margin.

0:29:39.204 --> 0:29:41.684
<v Speaker 1>So for either candidate, on the margin, it should help.

0:29:42.964 --> 0:29:46.044
<v Speaker 1>What about endorsements, So you know, we talked a few

0:29:46.084 --> 0:29:52.004
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago Taylor Swift obviously was a major endorsement. Do

0:29:52.164 --> 0:29:56.364
<v Speaker 1>those things matter? Does it matter? Obviously? Like there are

0:29:56.524 --> 0:29:59.084
<v Speaker 1>levels of endorsement, right, Like at some point I saw

0:29:59.124 --> 0:30:02.844
<v Speaker 1>the Kamala Harris campaign retweeting that, like, Meryl Streep has

0:30:02.924 --> 0:30:04.484
<v Speaker 1>endorsed her and this is huge. I'm like, I don't

0:30:04.484 --> 0:30:08.284
<v Speaker 1>think Meryl Streep's endorsement matters. I'm sorry, I love you,

0:30:08.364 --> 0:30:10.644
<v Speaker 1>Meryl Streep, but like I don't think that's going to

0:30:10.724 --> 0:30:11.324
<v Speaker 1>move the needle.

0:30:11.524 --> 0:30:14.284
<v Speaker 2>But someone It's like when they say somebody that dies

0:30:14.324 --> 0:30:16.964
<v Speaker 2>and you're like, I thought they're already dead, right right,

0:30:17.124 --> 0:30:19.244
<v Speaker 2>It's like I thought Meryl's she already endorsed, and that's

0:30:19.404 --> 0:30:25.004
<v Speaker 2>party true right for Tayte too, is uh. I think

0:30:25.004 --> 0:30:29.404
<v Speaker 2>people assume that she was on the Harris badwagon already.

0:30:29.404 --> 0:30:32.124
<v Speaker 2>I mean, look, she apparently drove some voter registration efforts

0:30:32.124 --> 0:30:34.884
<v Speaker 2>and things like that, and so yeah, look, you you

0:30:34.964 --> 0:30:38.124
<v Speaker 2>definitely take that if you're if you're Harris, right, but

0:30:38.164 --> 0:30:40.164
<v Speaker 2>if like, but it's not like you see like a

0:30:40.164 --> 0:30:41.764
<v Speaker 2>big I mean, it's completive because it happened about the

0:30:41.804 --> 0:30:45.084
<v Speaker 2>same time as a debate, but it's you know, the

0:30:45.084 --> 0:30:46.924
<v Speaker 2>biggest pop star in the world endorses and you can

0:30:46.964 --> 0:30:50.324
<v Speaker 2>barely see any difference if any of the polls. So

0:30:50.404 --> 0:30:51.764
<v Speaker 2>that puts kind of a cap.

0:30:51.564 --> 0:30:56.964
<v Speaker 1>On Sure, what I was actually wondering if maybe the

0:30:57.124 --> 0:31:00.244
<v Speaker 1>endorsement you said something which I think is really important,

0:31:00.244 --> 0:31:02.964
<v Speaker 1>which is that most people kind of already assumed right

0:31:03.004 --> 0:31:06.004
<v Speaker 1>that that she was going to be team Harris because

0:31:06.004 --> 0:31:08.684
<v Speaker 1>she had endorsed Biden. She had already kind of broken

0:31:08.724 --> 0:31:12.644
<v Speaker 1>her silence. But what about things like and here, I

0:31:12.644 --> 0:31:15.644
<v Speaker 1>think there's some really interesting psych research. What about things

0:31:15.644 --> 0:31:19.964
<v Speaker 1>like Willie Nelson endorsing the Democrats, right, Like you have

0:31:20.084 --> 0:31:23.764
<v Speaker 1>a white country singer, Like when you have people who

0:31:24.604 --> 0:31:28.484
<v Speaker 1>look and sound and kind of have the background of

0:31:28.524 --> 0:31:33.044
<v Speaker 1>someone who would more traditionally be a Trump supporter, do

0:31:33.084 --> 0:31:35.484
<v Speaker 1>we think that that actually might matter a little bit

0:31:35.484 --> 0:31:39.204
<v Speaker 1>more than a Taylor Swift in these particular circumstances.

0:31:42.684 --> 0:31:46.044
<v Speaker 2>I mean, look, people know that the Hollywood types. You know,

0:31:46.084 --> 0:31:47.564
<v Speaker 2>I guess it's a singer, not a Hollywood type. I

0:31:47.604 --> 0:31:49.404
<v Speaker 2>take it. Maybe, I don't know. I mean, you know,

0:31:49.444 --> 0:31:53.124
<v Speaker 2>what probably did matter was, by the way, William Nelson

0:31:53.364 --> 0:31:55.524
<v Speaker 2>has quite a beautiful catalog of music going back along

0:31:55.564 --> 0:31:57.764
<v Speaker 2>way anyway, love it.

0:31:57.924 --> 0:31:59.724
<v Speaker 1>I love the editorializing on this.

0:31:59.724 --> 0:32:03.044
<v Speaker 2>Thus an endorsement in the race so far has probably

0:32:03.084 --> 0:32:08.684
<v Speaker 2>been RFK Junior endorsing endorsement cocided with a rough period

0:32:08.684 --> 0:32:11.244
<v Speaker 2>for Harris and the holes and like you know, and

0:32:11.284 --> 0:32:14.204
<v Speaker 2>those are those voters are lost, And I think so

0:32:14.244 --> 0:32:17.284
<v Speaker 2>that might have mattered a fair bit. Yeah, I mean

0:32:17.324 --> 0:32:19.324
<v Speaker 2>by half a point or something, but like half which.

0:32:19.164 --> 0:32:21.404
<v Speaker 1>Is important, which is which is really important, as we

0:32:21.604 --> 0:32:25.084
<v Speaker 1>keep talking about. And there's also some psych research that's

0:32:25.124 --> 0:32:28.404
<v Speaker 1>really interesting into kind of the psychology of social influence

0:32:28.604 --> 0:32:33.364
<v Speaker 1>and having an effect on social norms and behavior. And

0:32:33.484 --> 0:32:37.844
<v Speaker 1>a lot of this research comes from Princeton University Betsy Pollock.

0:32:38.124 --> 0:32:40.724
<v Speaker 1>She won the MacArthur Genius Grant a number of years

0:32:40.764 --> 0:32:43.484
<v Speaker 1>ago for this work. And some of the stuff that

0:32:43.524 --> 0:32:47.164
<v Speaker 1>she shows is that you know, you need to have

0:32:47.404 --> 0:32:50.644
<v Speaker 1>the correct person say things, and they have to actually

0:32:50.724 --> 0:32:53.684
<v Speaker 1>be kind of from the background and kind of from

0:32:54.244 --> 0:32:58.324
<v Speaker 1>the from from a place that people who you're trying

0:32:58.324 --> 0:33:01.564
<v Speaker 1>to influence actually respect. Right, So, if you're trying to

0:33:01.604 --> 0:33:05.764
<v Speaker 1>influence potential Trump voters to vote for Kamala Harris, then

0:33:05.804 --> 0:33:09.284
<v Speaker 1>you want to be probably a white male from so

0:33:09.404 --> 0:33:12.284
<v Speaker 1>certain states with a certain background. If you want to

0:33:12.324 --> 0:33:17.044
<v Speaker 1>try to get Trump voters, if you want to get

0:33:17.284 --> 0:33:20.964
<v Speaker 1>Kamala Harris voters to vote for Trump, you probably want

0:33:21.364 --> 0:33:27.284
<v Speaker 1>someone who you know is a minority or you know female,

0:33:28.164 --> 0:33:31.124
<v Speaker 1>some you know someone someone who has kind of more

0:33:31.124 --> 0:33:35.644
<v Speaker 1>of a Kamala Harris vibe and then have them endorse Trump.

0:33:36.004 --> 0:33:38.844
<v Speaker 1>That would matter more. There was a really cool study

0:33:38.844 --> 0:33:43.204
<v Speaker 1>that was done on social media to see like basically,

0:33:43.684 --> 0:33:45.964
<v Speaker 1>what can you do to mitigate trolls? Right, Like, how

0:33:45.964 --> 0:33:49.244
<v Speaker 1>can you get people to change behavior? And the one

0:33:49.284 --> 0:33:52.684
<v Speaker 1>thing that actually worked the best was if you create

0:33:52.724 --> 0:33:56.764
<v Speaker 1>an account that's like a generic white man and he says, hey, like,

0:33:57.364 --> 0:34:00.084
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is a real person, like just you

0:34:00.164 --> 0:34:02.044
<v Speaker 1>might want to tone it down a little bit. That

0:34:02.124 --> 0:34:06.644
<v Speaker 1>actually worked as opposed to anything else. So it's I

0:34:06.684 --> 0:34:11.324
<v Speaker 1>think that when we talk about endorsements, they're not all

0:34:11.364 --> 0:34:14.684
<v Speaker 1>created equal, not just because of the reach like oh

0:34:14.684 --> 0:34:17.564
<v Speaker 1>you're a superstar, you're a pop star, but also like

0:34:17.844 --> 0:34:21.484
<v Speaker 1>who is your demographic, who do you represent? What is

0:34:21.524 --> 0:34:26.484
<v Speaker 1>your specific you know, voter appeal, and will you be

0:34:26.564 --> 0:34:30.924
<v Speaker 1>able to look like a person of authority to the

0:34:30.964 --> 0:34:32.084
<v Speaker 1>voters that you're trying to reach.

0:34:32.284 --> 0:34:36.644
<v Speaker 2>Two other important stories that I think we can't not mention.

0:34:37.644 --> 0:34:40.524
<v Speaker 2>Let me start with one that's like a bit less obvious.

0:34:40.644 --> 0:34:43.684
<v Speaker 2>Port workers have gone on strike in both the East

0:34:43.684 --> 0:34:48.524
<v Speaker 2>Coast and the Gulf Coast. Something some enormous amount of

0:34:48.524 --> 0:34:52.164
<v Speaker 2>commerce passes through one of these ports, and this could

0:34:52.164 --> 0:34:57.884
<v Speaker 2>potentially have a devastating effect on the economy and shipping,

0:34:57.924 --> 0:35:02.164
<v Speaker 2>which is already already a little bit constrained because you

0:35:02.204 --> 0:35:04.804
<v Speaker 2>have problems with the hootis in the Red Sea? Is

0:35:04.804 --> 0:35:08.124
<v Speaker 2>that right? So you already have like some shipping channels

0:35:08.124 --> 0:35:10.604
<v Speaker 2>that are operating a less of capacity that more kind

0:35:10.644 --> 0:35:15.084
<v Speaker 2>of affects Europe than the US. But supply chains have

0:35:15.164 --> 0:35:17.364
<v Speaker 2>struggled to get back to normal and this could cause

0:35:18.044 --> 0:35:20.164
<v Speaker 2>big problems, yes, but hurricane and things like that that's

0:35:20.204 --> 0:35:24.964
<v Speaker 2>affected So so you know, this is a real dilemma

0:35:25.124 --> 0:35:28.964
<v Speaker 2>for a Democratic white House. Biden has said he does

0:35:29.004 --> 0:35:32.244
<v Speaker 2>not want to invoke the Taft Hartley Act that could

0:35:32.324 --> 0:35:36.284
<v Speaker 2>require these striking workers to go back to work. But

0:35:36.324 --> 0:35:39.004
<v Speaker 2>they have a lot of leverage, right, They're like, well,

0:35:39.404 --> 0:35:42.244
<v Speaker 2>fuck your election up unless you give us a nice

0:35:42.284 --> 0:35:45.404
<v Speaker 2>new contract. And I mean that's we understand leverage, right,

0:35:45.444 --> 0:35:48.204
<v Speaker 2>And they have a lot of leverage. So far, the

0:35:48.204 --> 0:35:53.444
<v Speaker 2>Biden Whitehouse has been able to placate problems like this

0:35:53.524 --> 0:35:55.164
<v Speaker 2>in the past. Like that to me is like a

0:35:55.164 --> 0:36:01.244
<v Speaker 2>potential October surprise that that has to play negatively for

0:36:01.244 --> 0:36:02.164
<v Speaker 2>for Harris and Biden.

0:36:02.324 --> 0:36:05.284
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, And if we just like a little caveat I

0:36:05.284 --> 0:36:09.924
<v Speaker 1>think tie into endorsements given that this is kind of

0:36:09.924 --> 0:36:12.724
<v Speaker 1>a workers strike, is that the Teamsters Union did not

0:36:13.244 --> 0:36:16.324
<v Speaker 1>endorse either Canada for the first time in a long time.

0:36:16.684 --> 0:36:19.844
<v Speaker 1>So just something to keep in mind as we as

0:36:19.844 --> 0:36:21.964
<v Speaker 1>we think about this October surprise potentially.

0:36:23.884 --> 0:36:27.404
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, probably most Teamster members are are Trump.

0:36:28.804 --> 0:36:32.524
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it was actually Teamsters are leaning more Trump, even

0:36:32.524 --> 0:36:34.844
<v Speaker 1>though the Teamsters have endorsed the Democrats in the past,

0:36:35.644 --> 0:36:38.684
<v Speaker 1>and the latest survey data that I've seen the Teamsters

0:36:38.684 --> 0:36:40.404
<v Speaker 1>are heavily leaning Trump.

0:36:43.404 --> 0:36:47.364
<v Speaker 2>The other, of course, is the re escalating conflict in

0:36:47.404 --> 0:36:51.724
<v Speaker 2>the Middle East. That's a little harder to yep, predict, right,

0:36:51.804 --> 0:36:56.964
<v Speaker 2>it's opportunities to show leadership potentially. But look, I mean,

0:36:57.324 --> 0:37:01.004
<v Speaker 2>you can make an argument that, like, foreign policy has

0:37:01.044 --> 0:37:04.924
<v Speaker 2>not gone that well under Biden. The Middle East is

0:37:05.044 --> 0:37:10.204
<v Speaker 2>kind of blowing up, and you know, Ukraine was invaded,

0:37:10.604 --> 0:37:14.924
<v Speaker 2>American relations with China are probably worse now than they were.

0:37:16.324 --> 0:37:22.604
<v Speaker 2>You know, if Trump were more coherent and normal, then

0:37:22.684 --> 0:37:26.244
<v Speaker 2>he could form a pretty good critique of Biden's foreign policy,

0:37:26.564 --> 0:37:30.284
<v Speaker 2>I think. And as a reminder of that now, voters

0:37:30.364 --> 0:37:34.044
<v Speaker 2>usually don't care about foreign policy that much. To the

0:37:34.084 --> 0:37:38.124
<v Speaker 2>extent that they do, it's kind of about I was

0:37:38.124 --> 0:37:40.404
<v Speaker 2>gonna say that, you know that it's the politics of

0:37:41.164 --> 0:37:43.404
<v Speaker 2>It's not the foreign policy, right, it's the politics of

0:37:44.644 --> 0:37:47.604
<v Speaker 2>the state of Israel and how they exist or failed

0:37:47.604 --> 0:37:51.244
<v Speaker 2>to coexist with Palestinians and like, and that's territory where

0:37:51.244 --> 0:37:53.044
<v Speaker 2>we you know, I have written about that sum because

0:37:53.084 --> 0:37:56.164
<v Speaker 2>it like effects American politics so much. You know, that

0:37:56.284 --> 0:37:59.764
<v Speaker 2>seemed to have died down to some degree, although although

0:38:00.284 --> 0:38:02.764
<v Speaker 2>you know two percent of the population is Arab American

0:38:02.804 --> 0:38:06.884
<v Speaker 2>and Michigan around the Dearborn area, there clearly have been

0:38:06.924 --> 0:38:09.164
<v Speaker 2>signs and polls that shifted from being a Democratic vote

0:38:09.204 --> 0:38:12.284
<v Speaker 2>to people who are throwing their hands up and saying

0:38:12.324 --> 0:38:15.044
<v Speaker 2>I don't know what I'm going to do, So that

0:38:15.084 --> 0:38:17.084
<v Speaker 2>has an effect on the margin. But like, but anyway,

0:38:17.124 --> 0:38:18.964
<v Speaker 2>I just want to mention those two important stories.

0:38:19.044 --> 0:38:22.204
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, absolutely, And I think that it is interesting to

0:38:22.204 --> 0:38:26.044
<v Speaker 1>see how much anyone thing will end up affecting any

0:38:26.204 --> 0:38:29.524
<v Speaker 1>any person's decision to vote, just because we are in

0:38:29.924 --> 0:38:34.124
<v Speaker 1>such a close race, right, so much closer than than

0:38:34.484 --> 0:38:38.644
<v Speaker 1>we have been in the past, and so I think

0:38:38.684 --> 0:38:42.364
<v Speaker 1>that those things on the margin may matter, especially when

0:38:42.364 --> 0:38:44.484
<v Speaker 1>we're talking like back to the ports. You know, I

0:38:44.524 --> 0:38:48.244
<v Speaker 1>think that oftentimes voters are not thinking that long term.

0:38:48.404 --> 0:38:52.364
<v Speaker 1>So that's why foreign policy often doesn't end up making

0:38:52.404 --> 0:38:55.244
<v Speaker 1>that big of a difference. But if we see and

0:38:55.364 --> 0:38:57.684
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I don't know if there's enough time

0:38:58.044 --> 0:39:00.964
<v Speaker 1>to actually see any change in prices, availability, et cetera.

0:39:01.604 --> 0:39:03.604
<v Speaker 1>In the next few weeks. But if we do see that,

0:39:03.884 --> 0:39:06.964
<v Speaker 1>then I think that that will become a much bigger issue.

0:39:07.884 --> 0:39:10.324
<v Speaker 2>You know, this is also a test of Biden and

0:39:10.364 --> 0:39:13.764
<v Speaker 2>his capabilities. If you have multiple crises happening at once,

0:39:13.884 --> 0:39:17.724
<v Speaker 2>you know, I mean, the media seems reluctant. I mean

0:39:17.764 --> 0:39:22.524
<v Speaker 2>once once the uh once drydent dropped out was forced

0:39:22.524 --> 0:39:26.124
<v Speaker 2>out by the way. The Dana Carvey impression of Biden

0:39:26.164 --> 0:39:26.924
<v Speaker 2>was pretty fucking good.

0:39:27.124 --> 0:39:29.204
<v Speaker 1>It was very good. Yes, if you have not seen it,

0:39:29.524 --> 0:39:30.884
<v Speaker 1>I highly endorsed that.

0:39:32.364 --> 0:39:34.284
<v Speaker 2>But like since in the media is not the very

0:39:34.324 --> 0:39:39.764
<v Speaker 2>interested in covering his performance issues, and this will be

0:39:39.804 --> 0:39:41.004
<v Speaker 2>a test I suppose. Yeah.

0:39:41.044 --> 0:39:48.124
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely. After the break, let's talk about something. Uh well,

0:39:48.164 --> 0:39:50.124
<v Speaker 1>I was going to say lighter, but it involves death,

0:39:50.284 --> 0:39:54.644
<v Speaker 1>but non politics related lighter, but it involves death. After

0:39:54.684 --> 0:40:11.844
<v Speaker 1>the break, we had two people who are quite important

0:40:11.844 --> 0:40:15.404
<v Speaker 1>in the gambling world die since you know, in the

0:40:15.484 --> 0:40:19.924
<v Speaker 1>last few days. One of those died today is what Tuesday,

0:40:20.004 --> 0:40:23.164
<v Speaker 1>so yesterday Pete Rose and he was one of the

0:40:23.164 --> 0:40:25.724
<v Speaker 1>first people we talked about on this podcast. And the

0:40:25.804 --> 0:40:29.524
<v Speaker 1>other less well known to the mainstream public, Archie Callous

0:40:30.764 --> 0:40:33.564
<v Speaker 1>Nate do you have any thoughts on the death of

0:40:33.564 --> 0:40:39.164
<v Speaker 1>Pete Rose and his legacy for the world of baseball

0:40:39.164 --> 0:40:40.204
<v Speaker 1>in the world of gambling.

0:40:41.364 --> 0:40:45.404
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean Pete was a I never met him.

0:40:45.564 --> 0:40:49.284
<v Speaker 2>I think he was kind of the classic djen right

0:40:51.564 --> 0:40:53.684
<v Speaker 2>in Las Vegas till late in his life he did.

0:40:53.804 --> 0:40:56.364
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah, after he was after he was no longer

0:40:56.444 --> 0:40:59.004
<v Speaker 1>allowed to be associated with baseball, he made the move

0:40:59.084 --> 0:40:59.964
<v Speaker 1>to Las Vegas.

0:41:01.404 --> 0:41:05.764
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Look, this was kind of, I don't know, the

0:41:05.844 --> 0:41:10.164
<v Speaker 2>end of a certain era for baseball. Suppose I mean

0:41:10.244 --> 0:41:12.684
<v Speaker 2>Pete Rose. If you're not a baseball fan, right, he

0:41:12.724 --> 0:41:18.124
<v Speaker 2>played the game differently than anyone else. Right, lots of

0:41:18.124 --> 0:41:20.564
<v Speaker 2>bass hits, lots of his the name was Charlie Hustle, Right,

0:41:21.244 --> 0:41:24.724
<v Speaker 2>would barrel into catchers and second basement. I mean he

0:41:24.724 --> 0:41:31.084
<v Speaker 2>played baseball like it was football basically. Now, people like me,

0:41:31.804 --> 0:41:36.284
<v Speaker 2>before Pete Rose was known for gambling, people like me

0:41:36.284 --> 0:41:39.604
<v Speaker 2>would I said, Oh, Pete Rose, he's a little bit overrated. Right.

0:41:40.684 --> 0:41:42.564
<v Speaker 2>It was the endly subject of you know, he does

0:41:42.644 --> 0:41:45.124
<v Speaker 2>have the most hits in Major League Baseball history. He

0:41:45.124 --> 0:41:47.724
<v Speaker 2>doesn't get on base that much and doesn't have that

0:41:47.804 --> 0:41:50.724
<v Speaker 2>much power. A very very good player, but we'd say yeah,

0:41:50.724 --> 0:41:52.924
<v Speaker 2>he's one of the twenty best of all time, but

0:41:52.964 --> 0:41:55.844
<v Speaker 2>not you know, having the hits record doesn't necessarily And

0:41:55.884 --> 0:42:00.324
<v Speaker 2>he also played forever. He played Cincinnati, Philadelphia, Montreal briefly

0:42:00.364 --> 0:42:03.764
<v Speaker 2>Cincinnati again, played until he was like forty some years old.

0:42:04.204 --> 0:42:10.004
<v Speaker 2>So beloved, right, But he clearly I think on baseball.

0:42:10.044 --> 0:42:12.524
<v Speaker 2>There's not much ambiguity about that, and baseball kind of

0:42:12.564 --> 0:42:17.164
<v Speaker 2>always was very unforgiving about ever commuting his sentence of

0:42:17.244 --> 0:42:19.524
<v Speaker 2>really letting Pete Rose participate in any ways. And I

0:42:20.924 --> 0:42:23.164
<v Speaker 2>kind of understand that, but like I'm trying to remember

0:42:23.204 --> 0:42:23.804
<v Speaker 2>some of the history.

0:42:24.084 --> 0:42:29.004
<v Speaker 1>Originally he said that he bet on other sports but

0:42:29.124 --> 0:42:32.364
<v Speaker 1>never bet on baseball. He was still found to be

0:42:32.444 --> 0:42:38.764
<v Speaker 1>guilty of betting on baseball, and he in his memoir

0:42:39.884 --> 0:42:43.324
<v Speaker 1>admitted that, yeah, he did bet on baseball, but never

0:42:43.364 --> 0:42:46.324
<v Speaker 1>for his team to lose, because he only wanted his

0:42:46.364 --> 0:42:50.484
<v Speaker 1>team to win, as if that made it any better.

0:42:50.644 --> 0:42:53.004
<v Speaker 2>But part of it is so you had this commissioner

0:42:53.044 --> 0:42:57.644
<v Speaker 2>of baseball named Bart Giamatti, who was a president of

0:42:57.724 --> 0:43:01.204
<v Speaker 2>Yale University, and like this English literature professor who was

0:43:01.284 --> 0:43:05.884
<v Speaker 2>kind of this intellectual who was going to, you know,

0:43:06.044 --> 0:43:08.924
<v Speaker 2>take baseball to some new cultural significance and he got

0:43:08.924 --> 0:43:12.164
<v Speaker 2>tied up with Pete Rose and then died of a

0:43:12.164 --> 0:43:14.124
<v Speaker 2>heart attack after only I.

0:43:14.124 --> 0:43:17.084
<v Speaker 1>Think No, I think it was closer. I think it

0:43:17.124 --> 0:43:19.324
<v Speaker 1>was like weeks after he passed out the.

0:43:19.364 --> 0:43:24.084
<v Speaker 2>Verdict as as a we sirved for commission April through

0:43:24.124 --> 0:43:26.484
<v Speaker 2>September and then but yeah, the verdict, it was just.

0:43:26.444 --> 0:43:29.364
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it was right after he said that Pete Rose

0:43:29.404 --> 0:43:32.084
<v Speaker 1>was not allowed to play. I think that he died

0:43:32.084 --> 0:43:36.284
<v Speaker 1>like a week after that of a broken mind.

0:43:37.884 --> 0:43:43.324
<v Speaker 2>My theory is that this is part of why baseball

0:43:43.484 --> 0:43:46.404
<v Speaker 2>was kind of so unforgiving to Pete and the fact

0:43:46.404 --> 0:43:49.764
<v Speaker 2>that Pete Rose, I'm sure was an asshole, right, but

0:43:50.084 --> 0:43:53.564
<v Speaker 2>you know the fact that I think people I don't

0:43:53.804 --> 0:43:55.564
<v Speaker 2>I don't know this for I'm just going by the psychology.

0:43:55.604 --> 0:43:58.524
<v Speaker 2>I think they think, you know, Pete Rose somehow killed

0:43:58.524 --> 0:44:02.284
<v Speaker 2>Bart Jimmati through grief, died of a broken heart kind

0:44:02.284 --> 0:44:05.404
<v Speaker 2>of thing, right, Yeah, yeah.

0:44:04.804 --> 0:44:07.924
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Well, okay, so let's let's end that with one

0:44:08.044 --> 0:44:11.244
<v Speaker 1>question for unit. I just want to yes or no.

0:44:11.924 --> 0:44:13.924
<v Speaker 1>Does Pete Rose deserve to be in the Hall of Fame?

0:44:18.364 --> 0:44:21.964
<v Speaker 2>No? Okay, all right, you've been on baseball. Yeah, I

0:44:22.004 --> 0:44:23.804
<v Speaker 2>got it, all right.

0:44:24.604 --> 0:44:29.204
<v Speaker 1>And another legendary gambler died who did not play baseball

0:44:30.004 --> 0:44:34.644
<v Speaker 1>died this week Archie Carras and have you do you

0:44:34.724 --> 0:44:43.564
<v Speaker 1>know his story night? So he is someone who had

0:44:43.564 --> 0:44:48.164
<v Speaker 1>the nickname the Greek, just like another another famous gambler

0:44:48.524 --> 0:44:52.284
<v Speaker 1>in gambling history, and he went on one of the

0:44:52.284 --> 0:44:56.804
<v Speaker 1>most legendary runs in gambling history, and it's so legendary

0:44:56.844 --> 0:44:59.804
<v Speaker 1>that it's just known as the run with a capital

0:44:59.884 --> 0:45:03.764
<v Speaker 1>are he went from so he was just a total degen,

0:45:04.084 --> 0:45:07.124
<v Speaker 1>but in this particular case, he went from fifty dollars

0:45:07.484 --> 0:45:12.164
<v Speaker 1>to over forty million as he went on this insane

0:45:12.244 --> 0:45:15.364
<v Speaker 1>gambling run and then he lost it all back. And

0:45:15.444 --> 0:45:19.004
<v Speaker 1>he did this through a combination of just going on

0:45:19.044 --> 0:45:22.884
<v Speaker 1>an insane run in craps, which happens right like he

0:45:23.004 --> 0:45:26.884
<v Speaker 1>was in that percent of the distribution. Then he actually

0:45:26.884 --> 0:45:30.324
<v Speaker 1>played some poker, and people used to love playing poker

0:45:30.364 --> 0:45:32.204
<v Speaker 1>against him because he wasn't very good, but he thought

0:45:32.204 --> 0:45:34.324
<v Speaker 1>he was very good. But then he went on quite

0:45:34.324 --> 0:45:37.804
<v Speaker 1>the run where he ended up beating some of the

0:45:37.804 --> 0:45:40.524
<v Speaker 1>top players in the game, including Chip Reeze four millions

0:45:40.524 --> 0:45:44.364
<v Speaker 1>of dollars and yeah, and then he and then he

0:45:44.404 --> 0:45:47.364
<v Speaker 1>did some sports betting and he just did incredibly well

0:45:47.524 --> 0:45:49.604
<v Speaker 1>forty million. I think this was nineteen ninety two to

0:45:49.684 --> 0:45:55.044
<v Speaker 1>nineteen ninety four, and then he went broke, and eventually

0:45:55.684 --> 0:45:59.964
<v Speaker 1>he was accused of cheating multiple times, cheating in blackjack,

0:46:00.404 --> 0:46:03.964
<v Speaker 1>and then he became I believe the thirty third person,

0:46:04.044 --> 0:46:06.884
<v Speaker 1>but I might be wrong, thirty second, thirty fourth, something

0:46:06.924 --> 0:46:10.204
<v Speaker 1>along those lines, to enter the infamous Black Book of

0:46:10.644 --> 0:46:14.684
<v Speaker 1>Las Vegas casinos. Yeah, so he is became banned for

0:46:14.804 --> 0:46:19.004
<v Speaker 1>life from every single casino property in the state of Nevada,

0:46:19.604 --> 0:46:22.004
<v Speaker 1>and if he were to enter one, he would be

0:46:22.044 --> 0:46:25.844
<v Speaker 1>immediately arrested. So that is how he ended his days.

0:46:26.084 --> 0:46:29.444
<v Speaker 1>But how crazy is that? I just want to just say,

0:46:29.564 --> 0:46:34.204
<v Speaker 1>this is next level djon fifty dollars forty million broke.

0:46:34.964 --> 0:46:38.404
<v Speaker 2>Could be you, audience member, No, don't, don't, don't.

0:46:40.164 --> 0:46:42.804
<v Speaker 1>No, he was. He was clearly a sick individual.

0:46:42.884 --> 0:46:47.524
<v Speaker 2>You get forty million, play craps, stop stop, walk away,

0:46:48.044 --> 0:46:49.804
<v Speaker 2>walk away, Invest some.

0:46:49.804 --> 0:46:51.484
<v Speaker 1>Of it if you have. If you want to keep

0:46:51.524 --> 0:46:55.684
<v Speaker 1>playing craps, fine, like put put a one hundred thousand,

0:46:55.764 --> 0:46:58.524
<v Speaker 1>that's even too much of it back into crabs and

0:46:58.564 --> 0:47:02.204
<v Speaker 1>the rest just walk away, please, But no one ever does.

0:47:02.604 --> 0:47:05.444
<v Speaker 1>And I think that there's also the hubris there right

0:47:05.524 --> 0:47:08.844
<v Speaker 1>to think that I must be so good. And that

0:47:08.924 --> 0:47:12.204
<v Speaker 1>happened with his poker playing as well. He knew people

0:47:12.244 --> 0:47:14.484
<v Speaker 1>knew he wasn't good, that's why they were playing against him.

0:47:14.804 --> 0:47:17.604
<v Speaker 1>And then he just beat all of these players. And

0:47:17.884 --> 0:47:20.884
<v Speaker 1>that can happen when you're playing heads up right in

0:47:20.964 --> 0:47:24.764
<v Speaker 1>any one in any one scenario and any one iteration.

0:47:25.564 --> 0:47:27.364
<v Speaker 1>The worst player in the world can beat the best

0:47:27.364 --> 0:47:29.564
<v Speaker 1>player in the world if you just run it once,

0:47:30.284 --> 0:47:33.284
<v Speaker 1>because that's you know, poker is a game of skill,

0:47:33.724 --> 0:47:36.924
<v Speaker 1>but in the immediate term, in one specific hand, in

0:47:37.004 --> 0:47:39.684
<v Speaker 1>one game, there's a huge element of chance. So do

0:47:39.804 --> 0:47:42.564
<v Speaker 1>not let that chance get to you, and do not

0:47:42.724 --> 0:47:45.884
<v Speaker 1>forget that sometimes you just run ridiculously Rookie, do not

0:47:46.004 --> 0:47:48.804
<v Speaker 1>be Archie, and then take that forty million and go broke.

0:47:49.164 --> 0:47:52.124
<v Speaker 1>Rest in peace, Archie, Rest in peace, Pete. The world

0:47:52.204 --> 0:47:54.764
<v Speaker 1>has lost two gamblers of very different stripes.

0:47:54.804 --> 0:47:58.644
<v Speaker 2>Today, think about the poker games will have in hell.

0:47:58.884 --> 0:48:01.204
<v Speaker 1>Right, I don't know what that's a good I like

0:48:01.204 --> 0:48:02.324
<v Speaker 1>your I like your hell voice.

0:48:02.884 --> 0:48:04.604
<v Speaker 2>You know, I know what the poke. I've been in

0:48:04.644 --> 0:48:07.644
<v Speaker 2>the the two five game at the Commerce, and so

0:48:07.724 --> 0:48:11.724
<v Speaker 2>I know what poker in hell. On that note, We'll

0:48:11.764 --> 0:48:12.964
<v Speaker 2>see you all next week.

0:48:13.364 --> 0:48:13.724
<v Speaker 1>All right.

0:48:13.804 --> 0:48:16.564
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for joining us and tune in again every time

0:48:16.564 --> 0:48:17.084
<v Speaker 2>we have a show.

0:48:17.124 --> 0:48:20.684
<v Speaker 1>Oh, one more thing, we would love to leave you

0:48:20.804 --> 0:48:23.764
<v Speaker 1>with an email address for the show. If there's ever

0:48:23.804 --> 0:48:25.524
<v Speaker 1>anything you really want us to talk about. If you

0:48:25.604 --> 0:48:28.484
<v Speaker 1>have any feedback, we'd love to hear from you. Super easy,

0:48:28.884 --> 0:48:35.884
<v Speaker 1>Risky Business all one word lowercase at pushkin dot Fm.

0:48:36.044 --> 0:48:38.884
<v Speaker 2>Risky Business is hosted by me Nate Silver and me

0:48:39.044 --> 0:48:42.044
<v Speaker 2>Maria Kanakova. The show was a co production of Pushkin

0:48:42.084 --> 0:48:45.924
<v Speaker 2>Industries and iHeartMedia. This episode was produced by Isabel Carter.

0:48:46.484 --> 0:48:50.324
<v Speaker 2>Our associate producer is Gabriel hunter Chen. Our engineer is

0:48:50.364 --> 0:48:53.524
<v Speaker 2>Sarah Bruger. Our executive producer is Jacob Goldstein.

0:48:53.684 --> 0:48:55.404
<v Speaker 1>If you want to listen to an ad free version,

0:48:55.484 --> 0:48:58.164
<v Speaker 1>sign up for Pushkin Plus. For six ninety nine a month.

0:48:58.284 --> 0:49:01.244
<v Speaker 1>You get access to ad free listening. Thanks for tuning in.