WEBVTT - John Kerry Explains Why the Glasgow Climate Deal Matters

0:00:08.039 --> 0:00:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to Stephanomics, the podcast that brings the

0:00:10.520 --> 0:00:13.760
<v Speaker 1>global economy to you. You probably feel like you've already

0:00:13.760 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 1>heard plenty about the COP twenty six climate change conference

0:00:17.040 --> 0:00:20.040
<v Speaker 1>in Glasgow the other day. If you've been paying attention,

0:00:20.480 --> 0:00:23.200
<v Speaker 1>you may also remember some of the other COP meetings

0:00:23.640 --> 0:00:26.920
<v Speaker 1>COP twenty one in Paris, and I'll bet you know

0:00:27.000 --> 0:00:31.240
<v Speaker 1>that one. Also memorable for some was COP fifteen in

0:00:31.360 --> 0:00:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Copenhagen a few years before. That considered a bit of

0:00:34.760 --> 0:00:39.600
<v Speaker 1>a flop. But President Biden's Special Envoy on Climate, John Kerry,

0:00:40.000 --> 0:00:42.120
<v Speaker 1>has been at this game so long. He was at

0:00:42.120 --> 0:00:46.239
<v Speaker 1>the Earth Summit in Rio in which led to the

0:00:46.280 --> 0:00:49.240
<v Speaker 1>COP process in the first place. So I was fascinated

0:00:49.280 --> 0:00:53.240
<v Speaker 1>to get his long view on COPY when I spoke

0:00:53.280 --> 0:00:55.040
<v Speaker 1>to him on the last day of the New Economy

0:00:55.040 --> 0:00:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Forum last week. I also watched to find out what

0:00:58.360 --> 0:01:03.400
<v Speaker 1>that much trumpeted US China statement on climate cooperation was

0:01:03.440 --> 0:01:07.280
<v Speaker 1>actually going to achieve. He negotiated it, after all. We

0:01:07.319 --> 0:01:09.840
<v Speaker 1>have an edited version of that conversation in a little while.

0:01:10.360 --> 0:01:13.640
<v Speaker 1>I'll also be asking our Eurozone economist may VERA. Kusa,

0:01:14.240 --> 0:01:18.559
<v Speaker 1>why decarbonizing the economy could be a recipe for higher inflation.

0:01:19.319 --> 0:01:23.880
<v Speaker 1>But first something very different and important and thoughtful report

0:01:24.360 --> 0:01:28.680
<v Speaker 1>from Frankfurt based economy reporter Carolyn look on a subject

0:01:28.920 --> 0:01:32.520
<v Speaker 1>we haven't touched on before here on stephanomics, the economic

0:01:32.560 --> 0:01:36.640
<v Speaker 1>impact of violence against women. I should warn you this

0:01:36.680 --> 0:01:49.840
<v Speaker 1>piece does discuss experiences of domestic violence, medicraft, and I

0:01:49.880 --> 0:01:54.040
<v Speaker 1>don't have the energy and courage I once had, even

0:01:54.120 --> 0:01:59.480
<v Speaker 1>after a thousand therapies. It's broken and it's horrible because

0:01:59.480 --> 0:02:02.720
<v Speaker 1>that's something to have to live with. You can't change it.

0:02:04.920 --> 0:02:09.799
<v Speaker 1>Tanya is vivacious, adventurous, has an infectious laugh. In her

0:02:09.800 --> 0:02:12.760
<v Speaker 1>own words, She's a tough woman, one who worked many

0:02:12.760 --> 0:02:16.240
<v Speaker 1>different jobs when she was younger, first as a medical assistant,

0:02:16.440 --> 0:02:20.800
<v Speaker 1>than as an alternative medical practitioner, and later organizing events

0:02:20.800 --> 0:02:24.720
<v Speaker 1>and concerts in her native Hamburg. She always dreamed of

0:02:24.800 --> 0:02:28.120
<v Speaker 1>leaving Germany and moving abroad, and, like many of us,

0:02:28.240 --> 0:02:32.160
<v Speaker 1>of being cared for. She thought she found that when

0:02:32.200 --> 0:02:35.560
<v Speaker 1>she met her ex boyfriend about two decades ago. He

0:02:35.720 --> 0:02:38.359
<v Speaker 1>was eight years her senior and seemed like the first

0:02:38.400 --> 0:02:43.200
<v Speaker 1>man who really loved her. Now fifty two, Tanya realizes

0:02:43.280 --> 0:02:46.560
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't all that it seemed. Though. Tanya is not

0:02:46.639 --> 0:02:51.760
<v Speaker 1>her real name, which we've changed for her protection. In

0:02:53.919 --> 0:02:56.320
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't the first woman he beat up or was

0:02:56.440 --> 0:03:00.440
<v Speaker 1>violent against. There were apparently a few before me, and

0:03:00.520 --> 0:03:03.000
<v Speaker 1>he tell people in advance that I was mentally ill

0:03:03.120 --> 0:03:06.600
<v Speaker 1>and hysterical, just so that when he beat me up

0:03:07.000 --> 0:03:18.560
<v Speaker 1>he could say, yeah, I told you she's crazy. The

0:03:18.600 --> 0:03:22.200
<v Speaker 1>abuse began early in their relationship. Tanya broke up with

0:03:22.280 --> 0:03:24.600
<v Speaker 1>him at one point, but gave him a second chance.

0:03:25.360 --> 0:03:28.080
<v Speaker 1>They eventually decided to leave Germany and live in a

0:03:28.120 --> 0:03:31.120
<v Speaker 1>mobile home on the Greek island of Crete, which for

0:03:31.240 --> 0:03:35.040
<v Speaker 1>many would seem like a romantic adventure, but while there,

0:03:35.520 --> 0:03:38.680
<v Speaker 1>he locked her up, beat her, and later abandoned her

0:03:38.680 --> 0:03:41.600
<v Speaker 1>on a beach, leaving her desperate and helpless in a

0:03:41.640 --> 0:03:46.160
<v Speaker 1>foreign country with few avenues for support. She felt she

0:03:46.200 --> 0:03:49.240
<v Speaker 1>had no choice but to return to Germany with him,

0:03:49.280 --> 0:03:51.400
<v Speaker 1>and it was only there that she managed to end

0:03:51.440 --> 0:03:54.080
<v Speaker 1>the two year nightmare when a colleague gave her a

0:03:54.120 --> 0:03:59.320
<v Speaker 1>place to stay. The violence Tanya had to experience is

0:03:59.400 --> 0:04:03.920
<v Speaker 1>unfortunately far from rare. One in three women experienced some

0:04:04.080 --> 0:04:07.320
<v Speaker 1>form of physical or sexual violence by an intimate partner

0:04:07.480 --> 0:04:12.240
<v Speaker 1>or non partner, according to the World Health Organization. While

0:04:12.280 --> 0:04:15.320
<v Speaker 1>the issue is sometimes framed as a personal issue and

0:04:15.400 --> 0:04:18.719
<v Speaker 1>one that's more common in developing countries, It's actually pervasive

0:04:18.760 --> 0:04:23.200
<v Speaker 1>across countries and carries deep emotional and economic costs, both

0:04:23.240 --> 0:04:27.400
<v Speaker 1>for victims and for wider society. Companies have started waking

0:04:27.480 --> 0:04:29.800
<v Speaker 1>up to this fact after a number of studies showed

0:04:29.800 --> 0:04:33.560
<v Speaker 1>how domestic abuse incurs both direct and indirect costs for

0:04:33.600 --> 0:04:37.960
<v Speaker 1>the economy, beyond the already substantial legal bills, health and

0:04:38.000 --> 0:04:43.240
<v Speaker 1>shelter costs. Victims naturally lose productivity when they suffer domestic abuse,

0:04:43.640 --> 0:04:47.960
<v Speaker 1>or might miss work altogether. In two thousand nineteen, Vodafone

0:04:48.000 --> 0:04:50.479
<v Speaker 1>became the first company to offer ten days of paid

0:04:50.520 --> 0:04:54.080
<v Speaker 1>leave to victims, and this year Facebook followed with twenty

0:04:54.160 --> 0:04:58.400
<v Speaker 1>days of paid leave. Here's chief operating officer Cheryl Sandberg

0:04:58.480 --> 0:05:01.760
<v Speaker 1>speaking on the day the policy was announced. This is

0:05:01.800 --> 0:05:06.839
<v Speaker 1>something that affects everyone, including our employees. It's a situation

0:05:06.839 --> 0:05:10.200
<v Speaker 1>where you need paid time off, and not just for yourself,

0:05:10.560 --> 0:05:14.039
<v Speaker 1>but for a loved one. And we're hoping, we're hoping that,

0:05:14.240 --> 0:05:17.680
<v Speaker 1>um this is a problem other companies will start tackling

0:05:17.720 --> 0:05:23.040
<v Speaker 1>as well. A huge part of the problem, as Tanya's

0:05:23.080 --> 0:05:25.760
<v Speaker 1>case showed, is that attitudes in the workplace are often

0:05:25.800 --> 0:05:28.560
<v Speaker 1>a huge deterrent to getting support in the first place.

0:05:29.520 --> 0:05:32.880
<v Speaker 1>When she left her violent partner, several of her male

0:05:32.920 --> 0:05:35.960
<v Speaker 1>colleagues initially took turns driving her to and from work

0:05:36.040 --> 0:05:38.880
<v Speaker 1>to keep her safe, but none of them actually talked

0:05:38.880 --> 0:05:42.800
<v Speaker 1>to her, she says, or seemed to care very much. Eventually,

0:05:42.960 --> 0:05:45.520
<v Speaker 1>her boss began harassing her and she had to quit

0:05:45.560 --> 0:05:53.559
<v Speaker 1>her job. After my experience with domestic violence, I wanted

0:05:53.600 --> 0:05:56.839
<v Speaker 1>to make decisions for myself. I didn't want to be

0:05:56.880 --> 0:06:05.000
<v Speaker 1>an employee somewhere and let someone have power over Nowadays,

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Tanya as a freelance designer. It doesn't pay much, but

0:06:08.520 --> 0:06:11.320
<v Speaker 1>she'd rather do that than share control with a workplace

0:06:11.400 --> 0:06:16.760
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't have her best interests in mind. Employers could

0:06:16.760 --> 0:06:19.800
<v Speaker 1>actually do a lot to help victims. After all, where

0:06:19.839 --> 0:06:21.800
<v Speaker 1>we work is where we spend one of the largest

0:06:21.839 --> 0:06:25.840
<v Speaker 1>portions of our time. That's according to Jane Pillinger, an

0:06:25.839 --> 0:06:28.919
<v Speaker 1>independent gender expert who worked with the u N and

0:06:29.080 --> 0:06:33.680
<v Speaker 1>it's International Labor organization on domestic violence policy. One of

0:06:33.720 --> 0:06:36.000
<v Speaker 1>the really interesting things from the work that I've been

0:06:36.040 --> 0:06:40.279
<v Speaker 1>involved in with trade unions and with companies across the

0:06:40.320 --> 0:06:44.560
<v Speaker 1>world is just how relevant it is to be doing

0:06:44.600 --> 0:06:49.039
<v Speaker 1>awareness raising in the workplace, giving people the tools to

0:06:49.080 --> 0:06:52.479
<v Speaker 1>spot the signs, to communicate with somebody who's who's experiencing

0:06:52.480 --> 0:06:55.440
<v Speaker 1>domestic abuse, because you might not be able to solve

0:06:55.480 --> 0:06:58.000
<v Speaker 1>the problem, but you can open the door to helping

0:06:59.000 --> 0:07:02.760
<v Speaker 1>somebody take the first step to surviving to mystic abuse.

0:07:05.279 --> 0:07:09.320
<v Speaker 1>In Germany, where Tanya is from, flawed attitudes about partner

0:07:09.400 --> 0:07:13.120
<v Speaker 1>violence run deep. A recent study by an organization called

0:07:13.120 --> 0:07:17.160
<v Speaker 1>front Line one hundred surveyed hundreds of business owners, managers,

0:07:17.160 --> 0:07:20.600
<v Speaker 1>and executives and showed that one in four believed that

0:07:20.640 --> 0:07:24.400
<v Speaker 1>there are reasons that can justify physical violence against a partner.

0:07:25.760 --> 0:07:30.080
<v Speaker 1>The survey respondents, who were mostly men, most often selected

0:07:30.080 --> 0:07:34.240
<v Speaker 1>reasons such as not completing one's housework or refusing to

0:07:34.320 --> 0:07:39.680
<v Speaker 1>have sex with the other as justifying such violence. German

0:07:39.720 --> 0:07:44.280
<v Speaker 1>women's attitudes are just as concerning. Nearly twenty of women

0:07:44.400 --> 0:07:47.680
<v Speaker 1>consider a husband to be justified in hitting or beating

0:07:47.760 --> 0:07:51.440
<v Speaker 1>his wife, according to a two thousan c D report.

0:07:52.280 --> 0:07:56.000
<v Speaker 1>That's more than in any other country in Europe. The

0:07:56.040 --> 0:07:59.160
<v Speaker 1>bottom line of all this is that blindness towards the

0:07:59.200 --> 0:08:04.000
<v Speaker 1>troubling in sequences of domestic abuse is costing economies billions.

0:08:04.520 --> 0:08:08.400
<v Speaker 1>The European Institute for Gender Equality estimates that the cost

0:08:08.440 --> 0:08:12.080
<v Speaker 1>of gender based violence across the European Union is three

0:08:12.120 --> 0:08:16.400
<v Speaker 1>hundred sixty six billion euros a year. Sylvia Sako, a

0:08:16.480 --> 0:08:20.240
<v Speaker 1>professor at the Brandenburg University of Technology, has studied the

0:08:20.280 --> 0:08:23.800
<v Speaker 1>cost of domestic violence in Germany and says that companies

0:08:23.880 --> 0:08:26.040
<v Speaker 1>need to do much more to stand up for victims.

0:08:27.360 --> 0:08:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Here she is discussing one case she was involved in

0:08:30.360 --> 0:08:34.200
<v Speaker 1>in which a female stalking victim spent years trying unsuccessfully

0:08:34.200 --> 0:08:40.960
<v Speaker 1>to get help. You have done on She already exhausted

0:08:41.000 --> 0:08:44.960
<v Speaker 1>all sorts of police measures and everything was unsuccessful. She

0:08:45.080 --> 0:08:47.960
<v Speaker 1>then lost her job. She became chronically ill for a

0:08:47.960 --> 0:08:51.640
<v Speaker 1>long time, and then years later turned to the employer

0:08:51.720 --> 0:08:54.839
<v Speaker 1>of the stalker. I eat the perpetrator and asked him

0:08:55.000 --> 0:09:03.120
<v Speaker 1>for a conversation. The perpetrator's boss ended up confronting his

0:09:03.160 --> 0:09:06.360
<v Speaker 1>employee about his actions, and it was only then that

0:09:06.440 --> 0:09:09.839
<v Speaker 1>the starking finally stopped after years of trying to get help.

0:09:10.720 --> 0:09:13.719
<v Speaker 1>Here's Jane Pillinger again. I suppose you know a lot

0:09:13.720 --> 0:09:17.559
<v Speaker 1>of employers have said, why is it my responsibility, it's

0:09:17.559 --> 0:09:20.600
<v Speaker 1>a private issue in the home. Well, it's it is

0:09:20.640 --> 0:09:23.319
<v Speaker 1>a private issue in the home, but you know it

0:09:23.440 --> 0:09:27.960
<v Speaker 1>spills over into the workplace, and that's the issue for

0:09:28.000 --> 0:09:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News. I'm Caroline luck Are now as advertised, here's

0:09:44.360 --> 0:09:48.040
<v Speaker 1>that conversation with Presidential Special Envoy on Climate Change John

0:09:48.120 --> 0:09:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Kerry for the Bloomberg New Economy Forum. One of the

0:09:52.360 --> 0:09:57.360
<v Speaker 1>I guess relatively few positive surprises out of the Glasgow

0:09:58.040 --> 0:10:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Summit was the US China Joint Glasgow Declaration on Climate

0:10:05.480 --> 0:10:08.640
<v Speaker 1>enormous symbolic significance. Clearly there haven't been a lot of

0:10:08.720 --> 0:10:11.960
<v Speaker 1>joint US China or anything for a while. But what

0:10:12.360 --> 0:10:15.560
<v Speaker 1>practical difference when we look at the words in that document,

0:10:15.600 --> 0:10:18.240
<v Speaker 1>what practical difference are they going to make to the

0:10:18.240 --> 0:10:24.880
<v Speaker 1>battle to contain climate change? Stephanie, the China Agreement is,

0:10:24.960 --> 0:10:29.080
<v Speaker 1>in fact, I think significant. I'm not saying that because

0:10:29.840 --> 0:10:34.240
<v Speaker 1>negotiated it with Shia Jama, who is a long time

0:10:34.640 --> 0:10:37.520
<v Speaker 1>associate and friend. He and I know each other quite

0:10:37.520 --> 0:10:41.800
<v Speaker 1>well over twenty plus years UM and we've worked at this, uh,

0:10:42.200 --> 0:10:48.839
<v Speaker 1>this issue. UH. The agreement is five pages that lay

0:10:48.880 --> 0:10:54.400
<v Speaker 1>out our cooperative effort not just on methane and CEO two,

0:10:54.559 --> 0:10:59.040
<v Speaker 1>but also on deforestation and the creation of a working

0:10:59.080 --> 0:11:03.920
<v Speaker 1>group between our two countries which we are now immediately

0:11:04.040 --> 0:11:07.480
<v Speaker 1>going to begin to activate. And I hope that our

0:11:07.559 --> 0:11:12.200
<v Speaker 1>working together will increase the sharing of data, increase the

0:11:12.200 --> 0:11:17.600
<v Speaker 1>sharing of of options, and begin to engage us in

0:11:17.640 --> 0:11:20.680
<v Speaker 1>a very important dialogue with the top leadership of both

0:11:20.679 --> 0:11:25.439
<v Speaker 1>of our countries. UM And and that's our hope. But importantly,

0:11:26.679 --> 0:11:32.080
<v Speaker 1>the agreement is quite specific in addressing methane with a

0:11:32.120 --> 0:11:36.000
<v Speaker 1>specific date for action. And the pledge is that we

0:11:36.040 --> 0:11:41.480
<v Speaker 1>will reduce methane by on a global basis, which doesn't

0:11:41.520 --> 0:11:44.440
<v Speaker 1>mean any individual country is doing the percent, but in

0:11:44.559 --> 0:11:49.920
<v Speaker 1>contributed global aggregation we will get a thirty percent reduction

0:11:49.960 --> 0:11:55.040
<v Speaker 1>on a global basis. And and trying to agreed UM

0:11:55.080 --> 0:11:58.480
<v Speaker 1>to work with us to lay out an ambitious these

0:11:58.559 --> 0:12:03.040
<v Speaker 1>these are the words AMBITI a national action plan which

0:12:03.160 --> 0:12:07.640
<v Speaker 1>China must submit and and begin acting on by copy

0:12:07.720 --> 0:12:11.360
<v Speaker 1>seven a year from now in uh in Charmel Shake.

0:12:12.240 --> 0:12:16.160
<v Speaker 1>So if we were to do the thirty percent reduction

0:12:16.440 --> 0:12:22.120
<v Speaker 1>of methane on a global basis by as Fati Birol

0:12:22.240 --> 0:12:24.280
<v Speaker 1>of the I e A has made clear to us,

0:12:24.920 --> 0:12:28.520
<v Speaker 1>that is the equivalent of taking all the cars of

0:12:28.559 --> 0:12:31.040
<v Speaker 1>the world, all the trucks of the world, all the

0:12:31.080 --> 0:12:34.000
<v Speaker 1>ships of the world, all the planes of the world

0:12:34.640 --> 0:12:39.920
<v Speaker 1>to zero emissions. By so you can get a sentence

0:12:39.960 --> 0:12:42.760
<v Speaker 1>of the enormity of what the reduction of methane can mean.

0:12:42.840 --> 0:12:46.760
<v Speaker 1>It's about a point to degree reduction in the rise

0:12:46.880 --> 0:12:51.040
<v Speaker 1>of the Earth's temperature and it's the single biggest, fastest

0:12:51.440 --> 0:12:54.880
<v Speaker 1>grab that we can make for dealing with this problem.

0:12:54.920 --> 0:12:58.960
<v Speaker 1>The third thing that the agreement does is sets a

0:12:59.080 --> 0:13:05.120
<v Speaker 1>date currently for when China, in the commencement of its

0:13:05.160 --> 0:13:12.880
<v Speaker 1>fifteen five year plant, begins to phase down the consumption

0:13:12.880 --> 0:13:16.559
<v Speaker 1>of coal and does so with an agreement with us

0:13:17.280 --> 0:13:21.800
<v Speaker 1>that together we will work to make best efforts to

0:13:21.920 --> 0:13:27.480
<v Speaker 1>accelerate the reduction the phase out of coal. So all

0:13:27.520 --> 0:13:30.400
<v Speaker 1>of what we do in Glasgow, or did in Glasgow

0:13:30.480 --> 0:13:35.440
<v Speaker 1>obviously results in words reduced to paper, but that is

0:13:35.480 --> 0:13:38.760
<v Speaker 1>what brought us to Glasgow, that is what resulted in

0:13:38.800 --> 0:13:43.319
<v Speaker 1>the submission of a National Determined Contributions or n d

0:13:43.480 --> 0:13:47.880
<v Speaker 1>c s the production of emissions. It's the words translated

0:13:47.920 --> 0:13:53.920
<v Speaker 1>into actions that actually resulted in our committing to additional

0:13:54.000 --> 0:13:58.000
<v Speaker 1>funds forty a doubling of the amount of money that

0:13:58.040 --> 0:14:02.120
<v Speaker 1>goes into adaptation of significant recognition of the challenge of

0:14:02.240 --> 0:14:06.320
<v Speaker 1>loss and damages with the beginning of a dialogue that

0:14:06.320 --> 0:14:09.080
<v Speaker 1>will take place over the next year to figure out

0:14:09.120 --> 0:14:19.200
<v Speaker 1>how we deal with that. You mentioned the sums for

0:14:19.320 --> 0:14:23.960
<v Speaker 1>adaptation and mitigation for the developing countries. That was one

0:14:24.040 --> 0:14:28.880
<v Speaker 1>aspect of this agreement that certainly felt short and for

0:14:28.960 --> 0:14:32.520
<v Speaker 1>many who were there through all of the negotiations left

0:14:32.520 --> 0:14:34.840
<v Speaker 1>a kind of bitter taste in their in their mouths,

0:14:34.880 --> 0:14:39.760
<v Speaker 1>because it felt that it seemed too many that very

0:14:39.800 --> 0:14:43.440
<v Speaker 1>little progress have been made in really offering developing countries

0:14:43.480 --> 0:14:48.200
<v Speaker 1>a path two develop as well as be part of

0:14:48.240 --> 0:14:53.080
<v Speaker 1>this climate action. Do you understand those who felt disappointed

0:14:53.080 --> 0:14:55.880
<v Speaker 1>by what came out of it, the lack of actual

0:14:56.000 --> 0:14:58.720
<v Speaker 1>money on the loss and damage and the failure to

0:14:58.800 --> 0:15:01.800
<v Speaker 1>even meet the hundred billion dollar target, which you've admitted

0:15:01.880 --> 0:15:04.760
<v Speaker 1>was is nothing in the scheme of things of what's

0:15:04.800 --> 0:15:06.760
<v Speaker 1>going to be needed. Well, look, let me let me

0:15:06.800 --> 0:15:09.840
<v Speaker 1>be more Stephanie. I'm glad you asked the question because

0:15:09.880 --> 0:15:12.920
<v Speaker 1>I really wanted to tackle that. You know, the hundred

0:15:12.920 --> 0:15:15.920
<v Speaker 1>billion was a goal. It's become a target, but it

0:15:16.000 --> 0:15:18.520
<v Speaker 1>was a goal. It was pulled out of the air

0:15:18.600 --> 0:15:22.920
<v Speaker 1>by Gordon Brown. I think in Copenhagen Uh. Where they

0:15:22.920 --> 0:15:26.000
<v Speaker 1>were trying to find agreement and and they decided to

0:15:26.120 --> 0:15:30.320
<v Speaker 1>be a hundred billion. We accepted that in Paris when

0:15:30.440 --> 0:15:33.360
<v Speaker 1>we negotiated it. But as I said, it was the

0:15:33.400 --> 0:15:36.920
<v Speaker 1>goal of a hundred billion. When I took this job on,

0:15:37.480 --> 0:15:43.800
<v Speaker 1>we were at sixty seven billion for the year. Uh

0:15:44.760 --> 0:15:48.120
<v Speaker 1>excuse me, And um, that's the first year the Biden

0:15:48.120 --> 0:15:52.120
<v Speaker 1>administration could step up, Folks. A guy named Donald Trump

0:15:52.200 --> 0:15:55.120
<v Speaker 1>cut all the funding, and a guy named Donald Trump

0:15:55.160 --> 0:15:58.120
<v Speaker 1>pulled out of the agreement. And so when Joe Biden

0:15:58.160 --> 0:16:00.560
<v Speaker 1>became president, the first budget he is in front of

0:16:00.600 --> 0:16:03.600
<v Speaker 1>them is that budget we're working on right now. And

0:16:03.680 --> 0:16:07.360
<v Speaker 1>we put eleven point four billion into that, doubling the

0:16:07.440 --> 0:16:11.040
<v Speaker 1>already doubling that Joe Biden had engaged in. Even as

0:16:11.040 --> 0:16:13.600
<v Speaker 1>we're trying to get our own country back on track

0:16:14.000 --> 0:16:15.760
<v Speaker 1>and do the things we need to do to get

0:16:15.760 --> 0:16:20.360
<v Speaker 1>the job done. We've had, we've accepted a fifty production.

0:16:21.040 --> 0:16:24.400
<v Speaker 1>We are legitimately on track to keep one point five

0:16:24.480 --> 0:16:28.800
<v Speaker 1>degrees alive. And I personally which more energy was spent

0:16:29.200 --> 0:16:31.960
<v Speaker 1>focusing on some of the countries that didn't submit in

0:16:32.120 --> 0:16:36.040
<v Speaker 1>d c s or folks and big countries, and focusing

0:16:36.080 --> 0:16:38.520
<v Speaker 1>on the countries that are not on a one point

0:16:38.520 --> 0:16:42.720
<v Speaker 1>five track, but indeed are going to be uh, you know,

0:16:43.160 --> 0:16:46.920
<v Speaker 1>putting more emissions into the into the atmosphere over the

0:16:46.960 --> 0:16:50.760
<v Speaker 1>course of the next number of years. So the reality

0:16:50.880 --> 0:16:55.240
<v Speaker 1>is we got up to nine to ninety seven billion

0:16:55.640 --> 0:16:58.360
<v Speaker 1>according to the o E c D for next year,

0:16:58.840 --> 0:17:01.880
<v Speaker 1>and if we can come pleat the budget that we

0:17:01.920 --> 0:17:04.800
<v Speaker 1>have coming in, then we'll be over the hundred billion

0:17:04.840 --> 0:17:07.679
<v Speaker 1>for next year. So we are making good in the

0:17:07.720 --> 0:17:09.840
<v Speaker 1>first year that we have an opportunity need to do

0:17:09.960 --> 0:17:13.520
<v Speaker 1>something with the budget. In addition, loss and damage does

0:17:13.560 --> 0:17:16.479
<v Speaker 1>not even have been accepted at a major part of

0:17:16.520 --> 0:17:18.879
<v Speaker 1>the agreement that we accepted the idea that it is

0:17:18.920 --> 0:17:21.359
<v Speaker 1>important to deal with and that we do have to

0:17:21.400 --> 0:17:24.199
<v Speaker 1>have a dialogue. But look, if we don't want to

0:17:24.200 --> 0:17:27.399
<v Speaker 1>shut the entire United States Congress down on putting money

0:17:27.400 --> 0:17:32.240
<v Speaker 1>into climate, we can't accept the opening of the liability

0:17:32.280 --> 0:17:34.159
<v Speaker 1>which is going to tie up the courts and the

0:17:34.200 --> 0:17:37.400
<v Speaker 1>structure and not get the money we need for adaptation

0:17:37.440 --> 0:17:40.600
<v Speaker 1>and resilience. So we really ought to be putting more

0:17:40.640 --> 0:17:45.639
<v Speaker 1>effort into adaptation and resilience where we are doubling the money.

0:17:45.640 --> 0:17:49.840
<v Speaker 1>But the bigger issue, folks, is not a hundred billion dollars.

0:17:50.640 --> 0:17:53.520
<v Speaker 1>That's peanuts compared to what we have to be doing here.

0:17:54.160 --> 0:17:56.240
<v Speaker 1>And the fact is that we went to the top

0:17:56.280 --> 0:18:01.400
<v Speaker 1>banks in the United States. I personally engage with Goldman Acts, Morgan, Stanley,

0:18:01.440 --> 0:18:06.879
<v Speaker 1>well Spargo, City, uh JP, Morgan, Bank of America, and

0:18:07.040 --> 0:18:10.320
<v Speaker 1>those six banks have committed that over the next ten

0:18:10.400 --> 0:18:15.479
<v Speaker 1>years they're prepared and will invest four point one six

0:18:15.520 --> 0:18:20.080
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollars in this transition. In addition, Larry Fink at

0:18:20.119 --> 0:18:22.040
<v Speaker 1>black Rock says he's going to put at least a

0:18:22.119 --> 0:18:25.760
<v Speaker 1>trillion in and and others will. And there's a Global

0:18:26.200 --> 0:18:29.720
<v Speaker 1>Finance Alliance which Mark Karney has has been working with,

0:18:30.160 --> 0:18:34.240
<v Speaker 1>which has tens of trillions allegedly of additional money. We

0:18:34.359 --> 0:18:37.320
<v Speaker 1>have to find a way to deploy that money. That

0:18:37.400 --> 0:18:41.320
<v Speaker 1>money is not giveaway, it's not concessionaire, it's ready to invest.

0:18:42.160 --> 0:18:46.680
<v Speaker 1>So countries bear responsibility to also step up and make

0:18:46.720 --> 0:18:50.399
<v Speaker 1>sure that they have the transparency and the contracting and

0:18:50.480 --> 0:18:54.320
<v Speaker 1>the p p a s and the ability to be

0:18:54.400 --> 0:18:59.800
<v Speaker 1>able to make those trillions into deployable investment bankable money.

0:19:00.280 --> 0:19:01.920
<v Speaker 1>You know as well as I do that a lot

0:19:01.960 --> 0:19:04.919
<v Speaker 1>of the money that's needed is needed in developing countries,

0:19:04.960 --> 0:19:08.639
<v Speaker 1>and there's no commitment from those big financial institutions to

0:19:09.280 --> 0:19:11.720
<v Speaker 1>take the money to where it's going to be really needed.

0:19:11.760 --> 0:19:13.880
<v Speaker 1>If you're if you were Prime Minister Modi, we had

0:19:13.880 --> 0:19:18.040
<v Speaker 1>a rather probably what you would consider a minimum commitment

0:19:18.080 --> 0:19:21.400
<v Speaker 1>from India at the cop But if you were Prime

0:19:21.400 --> 0:19:24.679
<v Speaker 1>Minister of India, would you have said anything different? Have

0:19:24.760 --> 0:19:27.000
<v Speaker 1>you been given any reason by the rest of the

0:19:27.040 --> 0:19:31.800
<v Speaker 1>world to be more ambitious in your domestic target when

0:19:31.840 --> 0:19:35.360
<v Speaker 1>you're also looking at a new to developing I understand

0:19:35.440 --> 0:19:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Prime Minister Money. I've met with them several times this year.

0:19:38.520 --> 0:19:41.720
<v Speaker 1>We formed a partnership to help India be able to

0:19:41.800 --> 0:19:45.520
<v Speaker 1>deploy at four hundred and fifty gigawatts of renewable power,

0:19:45.960 --> 0:19:50.639
<v Speaker 1>and we've agreed to bring finance and technology to the table.

0:19:51.760 --> 0:19:55.040
<v Speaker 1>We will need India's governmental help to be able to

0:19:55.080 --> 0:19:58.840
<v Speaker 1>make sure that the land is available either lease or sale,

0:19:59.200 --> 0:20:02.639
<v Speaker 1>that the transmit lines can move across one state to

0:20:02.720 --> 0:20:06.679
<v Speaker 1>another UH and obviously this is a two way street

0:20:06.760 --> 0:20:10.479
<v Speaker 1>to some degree. But in addition to that, yeah, we

0:20:10.560 --> 0:20:15.439
<v Speaker 1>have foreign assistance programs. We have the Development Finance Corporation,

0:20:15.480 --> 0:20:18.480
<v Speaker 1>which will have several billions of dollars that it is

0:20:18.520 --> 0:20:23.240
<v Speaker 1>already currently financing projects in less developed countries around the world.

0:20:23.720 --> 0:20:27.159
<v Speaker 1>But the real fight here, folks, let's we're gonna be

0:20:27.200 --> 0:20:30.639
<v Speaker 1>real about this. We we have been a leading nation

0:20:31.119 --> 0:20:38.040
<v Speaker 1>in consistently assisting other countries to develop. But figure, please

0:20:38.080 --> 0:20:44.840
<v Speaker 1>focus on this. Twenty countries equal of all the emissions.

0:20:45.119 --> 0:20:50.200
<v Speaker 1>They're basically your g twenty though not exclusively those those

0:20:50.280 --> 0:20:54.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty countries, they're the greatest responsibility for helping to solve

0:20:54.560 --> 0:20:57.960
<v Speaker 1>this crisis right now. And the fact is that no

0:20:58.160 --> 0:21:02.440
<v Speaker 1>country really accepted as included that this was a genuine

0:21:02.440 --> 0:21:08.080
<v Speaker 1>crisis until when we all went to Rio and formed

0:21:08.760 --> 0:21:11.560
<v Speaker 1>the process by which we now meet every year for

0:21:11.640 --> 0:21:15.159
<v Speaker 1>twenty six years. But the truth is a lot of

0:21:15.200 --> 0:21:19.200
<v Speaker 1>countries decided to grow with coal, not with nuclear, not

0:21:19.320 --> 0:21:23.520
<v Speaker 1>with gas, not with other alternatives. And coal is the

0:21:23.600 --> 0:21:28.400
<v Speaker 1>primary culprit today in warming the planet and in polluting

0:21:28.440 --> 0:21:32.560
<v Speaker 1>the air, and in creating the intensity of the storms

0:21:32.600 --> 0:21:36.240
<v Speaker 1>that comes with the increased moisture that rises from the oceans.

0:21:36.320 --> 0:21:38.879
<v Speaker 1>And we have to start where the greatest amount of

0:21:38.880 --> 0:21:41.840
<v Speaker 1>emissions are if we're going to win the battle. So

0:21:43.080 --> 0:21:48.520
<v Speaker 1>if more than of those twenty countries are now committed

0:21:48.520 --> 0:21:51.639
<v Speaker 1>to a one point five degree track. And what we

0:21:51.760 --> 0:21:53.760
<v Speaker 1>have to do is go to the countries where the

0:21:53.800 --> 0:21:57.040
<v Speaker 1>greatest amount of emissions are and begin to reduce the

0:21:57.080 --> 0:22:00.480
<v Speaker 1>greatest amount of missions the fastest we can, as fast

0:22:00.520 --> 0:22:06.680
<v Speaker 1>as we can, and and that means China, Russia, India, Mexico,

0:22:07.119 --> 0:22:11.240
<v Speaker 1>South Africa, Brazil. You know a group of country Indonesia,

0:22:11.800 --> 0:22:15.080
<v Speaker 1>and those are the countries we've been doing climate diplomacy with.

0:22:16.240 --> 0:22:20.199
<v Speaker 1>South Africa has accepted a new plan. But we have

0:22:20.359 --> 0:22:22.840
<v Speaker 1>to all of us be able to put the deals

0:22:22.880 --> 0:22:26.960
<v Speaker 1>together that will that will phase out their coal fast

0:22:27.320 --> 0:22:31.400
<v Speaker 1>and provide the alternative renewable energy. The truth is that

0:22:31.840 --> 0:22:35.879
<v Speaker 1>if India were to deploy the fifty gigawatts of renewable energy,

0:22:36.960 --> 0:22:40.520
<v Speaker 1>then India's in compliance with one point five degrees. So

0:22:40.760 --> 0:22:44.520
<v Speaker 1>this can happen. It will take all of us working together.

0:22:51.400 --> 0:22:54.639
<v Speaker 1>You talked about the importance of US leadership here, which

0:22:54.680 --> 0:22:59.199
<v Speaker 1>is clear. Commitments to this agenda didn't used to be

0:22:59.240 --> 0:23:02.040
<v Speaker 1>a partisan issue in the US, but it sure is now.

0:23:02.880 --> 0:23:06.000
<v Speaker 1>If you looked at the polls, if you look at

0:23:06.040 --> 0:23:10.240
<v Speaker 1>the recent election results in Virginia and elsewhere, you would

0:23:10.280 --> 0:23:15.800
<v Speaker 1>say the Democrats are overwhelming underdogs for next year's election,

0:23:16.160 --> 0:23:19.960
<v Speaker 1>and at this point for the next presidential election. Why

0:23:20.000 --> 0:23:22.560
<v Speaker 1>should the rest of the world believe this leadership is

0:23:22.600 --> 0:23:25.720
<v Speaker 1>going to continue beyond the next two or three years

0:23:25.880 --> 0:23:28.240
<v Speaker 1>in this crucial period for the very simple reason that

0:23:28.320 --> 0:23:31.520
<v Speaker 1>the marketplace is going there, whether the government does or not.

0:23:32.480 --> 0:23:35.719
<v Speaker 1>This is going to be a global revolution, and I

0:23:35.800 --> 0:23:38.800
<v Speaker 1>believe that transformation is going to be so far. Look,

0:23:39.119 --> 0:23:41.960
<v Speaker 1>General Motors and Ford Motor Company have already announced they're

0:23:41.960 --> 0:23:46.879
<v Speaker 1>gonna only produce electric cars by by They're gonna have

0:23:46.920 --> 0:23:50.560
<v Speaker 1>fifty of their cars are going to be produced our elector.

0:23:51.119 --> 0:23:53.119
<v Speaker 1>So I'm just telling you you think they're going to

0:23:53.200 --> 0:23:56.359
<v Speaker 1>spend hundreds of millions of dollars retooling those plants for

0:23:56.480 --> 0:23:59.879
<v Speaker 1>electric and then turn around because some politician comes in

0:24:00.320 --> 0:24:04.320
<v Speaker 1>and wants to deny science. Again. No, what we're doing

0:24:04.359 --> 0:24:07.359
<v Speaker 1>in the United States has nothing to do with politics

0:24:07.359 --> 0:24:10.840
<v Speaker 1>and ideology. It has everything to do with mathematics and physics.

0:24:11.680 --> 0:24:15.080
<v Speaker 1>And if you understand mathematics and physics and you believe

0:24:15.160 --> 0:24:18.879
<v Speaker 1>the science, this is gonna happen because it's gonna happen

0:24:18.920 --> 0:24:21.320
<v Speaker 1>in all the rest of the world, and the United

0:24:21.359 --> 0:24:23.760
<v Speaker 1>States is not stepping up to say, hey, we're the

0:24:23.840 --> 0:24:27.200
<v Speaker 1>leader here. This is everybody's got to be leaders here.

0:24:27.240 --> 0:24:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Everybody's gonna step in together. But we are here to

0:24:30.280 --> 0:24:32.800
<v Speaker 1>make up for the deficit of a guy who didn't

0:24:32.880 --> 0:24:36.479
<v Speaker 1>understand science and didn't have any economic rationale and who

0:24:36.560 --> 0:24:38.879
<v Speaker 1>pulled out of the Paris Agreement and hurt the world

0:24:38.920 --> 0:24:41.440
<v Speaker 1>in doing that. And we don't have any time for that.

0:24:41.880 --> 0:24:44.080
<v Speaker 1>So we're gonna come back. We're gonna do everything in

0:24:44.080 --> 0:24:47.560
<v Speaker 1>our power because our citizens are as exposed as citizens

0:24:47.560 --> 0:24:50.880
<v Speaker 1>everywhere else in the world. I mean, if, if, if,

0:24:50.640 --> 0:24:55.239
<v Speaker 1>if leaders don't grab onto this baton, they're gonna get

0:24:55.320 --> 0:24:59.240
<v Speaker 1>thrown out because the public understands what's happening and they're

0:24:59.280 --> 0:25:03.280
<v Speaker 1>demanding action from all of us. So I believe no

0:25:03.480 --> 0:25:08.359
<v Speaker 1>politician in four is going to step up. And besides,

0:25:08.840 --> 0:25:12.480
<v Speaker 1>it's way too premature to be making any speculations about

0:25:12.520 --> 0:25:16.080
<v Speaker 1>I can't believe what's going on. Prison Biden is going

0:25:16.119 --> 0:25:21.159
<v Speaker 1>to pass his next piece of legislation, and together with

0:25:21.280 --> 0:25:25.320
<v Speaker 1>his infrastructure bill, that's gonna put about two trillion plus dollars,

0:25:25.840 --> 0:25:27.879
<v Speaker 1>much of which is going to go to climate action

0:25:27.920 --> 0:25:31.000
<v Speaker 1>in the United States. And even while Donald Trump pulled

0:25:31.040 --> 0:25:35.399
<v Speaker 1>out of the agreement, the vast majority. Thirty seven governors

0:25:35.800 --> 0:25:39.040
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, Republican, the Democratic like continued to

0:25:39.040 --> 0:25:42.840
<v Speaker 1>stay in the Paris Agreement. Over a thousand mayors continued

0:25:42.880 --> 0:25:46.159
<v Speaker 1>to stay in the Paris Agreement. And they you know,

0:25:47.240 --> 0:25:50.439
<v Speaker 1>as I say, America's stayed in that agreement. And and

0:25:50.560 --> 0:25:55.240
<v Speaker 1>fully ninety of the new energy being brought online around

0:25:55.320 --> 0:25:59.800
<v Speaker 1>the world today is online because of renewables. This is

0:26:00.040 --> 0:26:04.120
<v Speaker 1>happening without government. It's happening because the marketplace has made

0:26:04.160 --> 0:26:06.919
<v Speaker 1>a decision. That's where we have to go. And with

0:26:07.040 --> 0:26:12.359
<v Speaker 1>disclosure and and trading mechanisms and pricing of carbon and

0:26:12.440 --> 0:26:16.480
<v Speaker 1>see bam coming at us. Believe me, folks, Uh, no

0:26:16.680 --> 0:26:20.840
<v Speaker 1>one politician can undo what is about to happen. Well,

0:26:20.880 --> 0:26:24.439
<v Speaker 1>that's an emphatic note on which to begin our final

0:26:24.600 --> 0:26:28.720
<v Speaker 1>day of deliberations. John Kerry, Special Presidential Envoy for Climate,

0:26:28.720 --> 0:26:30.720
<v Speaker 1>thank you very much for joining us. I have to

0:26:30.800 --> 0:26:42.159
<v Speaker 1>do really so I wanted to stick with the same

0:26:42.200 --> 0:26:45.280
<v Speaker 1>theme to pick up on some work that Bloomberg Economists

0:26:45.320 --> 0:26:48.840
<v Speaker 1>have done on the economic implications of climate change, with

0:26:48.880 --> 0:26:52.919
<v Speaker 1>one of the authors, Eurozone economist Mayva Kuza, friend of

0:26:52.960 --> 0:26:57.560
<v Speaker 1>the podcast Neva. So you're basically thinking through you know

0:26:58.480 --> 0:27:01.000
<v Speaker 1>what the kinds of things that we hear about. It's

0:27:01.200 --> 0:27:05.120
<v Speaker 1>a cop tow any six in Glasgow. Where countries are

0:27:05.119 --> 0:27:10.080
<v Speaker 1>making commitments very close short term or longer term commitments

0:27:10.119 --> 0:27:13.840
<v Speaker 1>to decarbonize, you know, inherent in that commitment is the

0:27:13.880 --> 0:27:17.679
<v Speaker 1>idea that carbon prices carbon, the price of carbon in

0:27:17.720 --> 0:27:19.520
<v Speaker 1>the economy is going to get higher, that we're going

0:27:19.560 --> 0:27:23.680
<v Speaker 1>to stop subsidizing all these fossil fuels. And what you're

0:27:23.720 --> 0:27:27.840
<v Speaker 1>looking at is the these various estimates of how that

0:27:28.080 --> 0:27:30.320
<v Speaker 1>rise in the carbon price is going to feed through

0:27:30.400 --> 0:27:32.840
<v Speaker 1>to the general level of prices and certainly the general

0:27:33.440 --> 0:27:38.720
<v Speaker 1>um rate of inflation. So when when you step back

0:27:38.760 --> 0:27:42.320
<v Speaker 1>from that research, do you think that the kind of

0:27:42.400 --> 0:27:46.040
<v Speaker 1>price hikes and mad variation in the cost of energy

0:27:46.080 --> 0:27:49.680
<v Speaker 1>that we've seen recently that's going to be much more

0:27:49.720 --> 0:27:53.120
<v Speaker 1>common in the future as we have these various different

0:27:53.280 --> 0:27:56.600
<v Speaker 1>rates of carbon. That's going to get much more common

0:27:56.960 --> 0:28:01.600
<v Speaker 1>as we have these efforts to decarbonize. So it will already,

0:28:01.720 --> 0:28:04.760
<v Speaker 1>I would say that it really depends on how old

0:28:04.760 --> 0:28:09.120
<v Speaker 1>only old disorder transition is. First, if you can imagine

0:28:09.320 --> 0:28:13.479
<v Speaker 1>a case where globally we um countries and policy makers

0:28:13.520 --> 0:28:17.920
<v Speaker 1>agree on a relatively well settled price for carbon. Then

0:28:18.000 --> 0:28:22.560
<v Speaker 1>it's easier for producers to plan ahead. It's probably easier

0:28:22.560 --> 0:28:26.200
<v Speaker 1>for inflation expectations to adjust as well, and you would

0:28:26.359 --> 0:28:31.560
<v Speaker 1>have this initial potential increase in producer prices, but it's

0:28:31.600 --> 0:28:35.960
<v Speaker 1>probably going to be much smoother if, in contrast, you

0:28:36.000 --> 0:28:37.960
<v Speaker 1>have something where from one year to the next we

0:28:38.000 --> 0:28:43.480
<v Speaker 1>can have very large changes in um carbon taxis, carbon prices,

0:28:43.600 --> 0:28:47.640
<v Speaker 1>carbon regulations, and there's less time to adapt than I

0:28:47.640 --> 0:28:51.360
<v Speaker 1>think the impact on prices is going to be bigger.

0:28:51.760 --> 0:28:54.920
<v Speaker 1>And in addition, it's also a question of how prepared

0:28:55.040 --> 0:28:59.160
<v Speaker 1>the energy system is to the new regulations. We know that,

0:28:59.200 --> 0:29:03.640
<v Speaker 1>for instance, renewable energy tend to be maybe more volatile

0:29:03.680 --> 0:29:07.120
<v Speaker 1>volatile in their production, and as long as there is

0:29:07.120 --> 0:29:13.200
<v Speaker 1>this sort of backup coming from more higher fuel intensive,

0:29:13.280 --> 0:29:17.320
<v Speaker 1>in emission intensive products they call, for instance, which would

0:29:17.320 --> 0:29:19.760
<v Speaker 1>cost a lot in the world with higher carbon prices,

0:29:20.080 --> 0:29:23.360
<v Speaker 1>then it would increase massively the cost of production if

0:29:23.760 --> 0:29:27.720
<v Speaker 1>renewable drops for a temperate period, and that will increase

0:29:28.280 --> 0:29:31.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of volatility of energy inflation. And I think one

0:29:31.880 --> 0:29:34.160
<v Speaker 1>thing that is important to consider as well is that

0:29:34.200 --> 0:29:37.680
<v Speaker 1>not only it will affect inflation, it would increase inflation,

0:29:37.920 --> 0:29:41.440
<v Speaker 1>but it's also as a place, so it would reduce growth,

0:29:41.520 --> 0:29:44.600
<v Speaker 1>it would reduce economic activity. And so for central box

0:29:44.680 --> 0:29:48.240
<v Speaker 1>you can have this sort of um much more volatile inflation,

0:29:49.080 --> 0:29:54.280
<v Speaker 1>higher on average, and the trade off with supporting the economy,

0:29:54.720 --> 0:29:58.560
<v Speaker 1>and different sample box will probably see this trade off differently.

0:29:58.920 --> 0:30:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Some may look fruit the pacing crazies and we have

0:30:02.880 --> 0:30:07.600
<v Speaker 1>higher inflation and mostly brought for crave. Some may actually

0:30:07.640 --> 0:30:10.400
<v Speaker 1>decide that they need to takeen policy to high in

0:30:10.440 --> 0:30:14.440
<v Speaker 1>inflation at the expense of the could activity. I guess

0:30:14.440 --> 0:30:17.480
<v Speaker 1>you've seen a little sort of dry run for some

0:30:17.600 --> 0:30:22.440
<v Speaker 1>of this where people are blaming efforts to combat climate

0:30:22.560 --> 0:30:27.040
<v Speaker 1>change for the spike in energy prices that we've seen.

0:30:27.840 --> 0:30:30.680
<v Speaker 1>And if we get the kind of variability of inflation,

0:30:31.280 --> 0:30:35.280
<v Speaker 1>the impact on growth that you've just talked about coming

0:30:35.280 --> 0:30:39.280
<v Speaker 1>down the track causing challenges for central bankers also as

0:30:39.320 --> 0:30:43.400
<v Speaker 1>a result of combating climate change, you know that could

0:30:43.680 --> 0:30:46.080
<v Speaker 1>that could make for some quite difficult politics as well

0:30:46.120 --> 0:30:51.240
<v Speaker 1>as decisions for central bankers. Yes, definity, and we've seen

0:30:51.320 --> 0:30:55.640
<v Speaker 1>that even increasing um energitects. For instance, we've seen in

0:30:56.000 --> 0:30:59.160
<v Speaker 1>France the religion par days that it's actually difficult. It's

0:30:59.160 --> 0:31:04.160
<v Speaker 1>so it tends to be energic, existance to be regressive,

0:31:04.200 --> 0:31:07.520
<v Speaker 1>so they tend to affect poor people more, and that's

0:31:07.520 --> 0:31:13.080
<v Speaker 1>always a very difficult political um political choice to make.

0:31:13.920 --> 0:31:17.040
<v Speaker 1>The recent increase we've seen in energy prices is a

0:31:17.080 --> 0:31:22.880
<v Speaker 1>combination of some very unusual renewable poor production from renewable

0:31:23.120 --> 0:31:27.000
<v Speaker 1>which we may see the wind not blowing exactly as

0:31:27.040 --> 0:31:31.400
<v Speaker 1>the remaking more if we rely more on renewable, plus

0:31:31.720 --> 0:31:35.200
<v Speaker 1>potentially if the climate system becomes more unusual as well.

0:31:36.120 --> 0:31:39.080
<v Speaker 1>But it's also a direct impact from the supplying negg.

0:31:39.160 --> 0:31:41.960
<v Speaker 1>It's supply bottom example, you sink for the pandemics, so

0:31:42.520 --> 0:31:45.440
<v Speaker 1>it's some of them. It's a bit of both. But

0:31:45.520 --> 0:31:48.360
<v Speaker 1>in any case, it's clear that the policy choices that

0:31:48.440 --> 0:31:51.800
<v Speaker 1>we have to be made in terms of UM, both

0:31:51.840 --> 0:31:55.680
<v Speaker 1>at the same time driving the tradition but also making

0:31:56.280 --> 0:32:00.040
<v Speaker 1>the adjustments UM and supporting the parts of the go

0:32:00.160 --> 0:32:02.960
<v Speaker 1>to mean that needs to body will be quite a

0:32:03.040 --> 0:32:06.800
<v Speaker 1>difficult challenge for for policymakers. And it's not a part

0:32:06.920 --> 0:32:11.560
<v Speaker 1>that part of the money UM from the Yobian Union

0:32:11.640 --> 0:32:14.200
<v Speaker 1>as part of their Andrew beck Age is on the

0:32:14.480 --> 0:32:17.960
<v Speaker 1>just position from for instance, because that's some things that

0:32:18.040 --> 0:32:21.600
<v Speaker 1>are already very aware. Yeah, the just transition, so making

0:32:21.600 --> 0:32:24.480
<v Speaker 1>sure that it doesn't just involve hiking the price of

0:32:24.560 --> 0:32:28.440
<v Speaker 1>energy and having it effect lower income households worse worse

0:32:28.520 --> 0:32:31.600
<v Speaker 1>than others. Um that's clearly is a very important piece

0:32:31.640 --> 0:32:41.520
<v Speaker 1>of that, maybe, Causina, thanks so much. Thank you. That's

0:32:41.600 --> 0:32:44.200
<v Speaker 1>it for this episode of Stephanomics, but do follow at

0:32:44.240 --> 0:32:47.240
<v Speaker 1>Economics on Twitter for a lot more news and analysis

0:32:47.360 --> 0:32:51.560
<v Speaker 1>from Bloomberg Economics. This episode was produced by Magnus Hendrickson,

0:32:51.880 --> 0:32:55.880
<v Speaker 1>with special thanks to John Kerry Maybel Cuzin, Karen and Look,

0:32:56.160 --> 0:33:00.959
<v Speaker 1>Claudia Madler, and Catherine Bosley. Mike Sasso as executive producer

0:33:01.000 --> 0:33:04.440
<v Speaker 1>of Stephanomics and the head of Bloomberg Podcast is Francesco

0:33:04.520 --> 0:33:19.360
<v Speaker 1>Levy m h M.