Speaker 1: You're listening to the Buck Sexton Show podcast.
Speaker 2: Make sure you subscribe to the podcast on the iHeartRadio
Speaker 2: app or wherever you get your podcasts. Welcome to the
Speaker 2: Buck Brief. We are about a week away from the election,
Speaker 2: so let's dive into where things stand right now. Kamala
Speaker 2: Harris is an absolute disaster of a candidate. That has
Speaker 2: been true for well all along, but more and more
Speaker 2: apparent as her appearances have increased, because she couldn't actually
Speaker 2: hide from the electorate, she couldn't actually just allow the
Speaker 2: media to make the case for her that she should
Speaker 2: be president. And now we have the final moments of
Speaker 2: this campaign from the Democrats devoted to Trump is Hitler.
Speaker 2: January sixth was an insurrection and if they meeting, the
Speaker 2: Democrats lose.
Speaker 3: Democracy is over.
Speaker 2: I don't know how to describe this in better terms
Speaker 2: than to just be honest. This is a mental illness.
Speaker 2: I don't know what you would call it, A pandemic
Speaker 2: of the mind, a mass hysteria.
Speaker 1: It is absurd.
Speaker 2: There's nothing about this that makes sense. There's no chance
Speaker 2: that Donald Trump would become a fascist, and I, as
Speaker 2: an ardent Trump supporter, would not allow a Nazi takeover
Speaker 2: of the government that would end elections and end all
Speaker 2: of our freedoms. The fact that they even say this
Speaker 2: stuff out loud and from the very top. This isn't
Speaker 2: the old way was Democrats would have henchmen, if you will,
Speaker 2: in the media and you know, dirty tricks politico types
Speaker 2: who would do the dirty tricks opo and would take
Speaker 2: the nasty shots at the other side and try to
Speaker 2: undermine them with the most gutter politics. No, this is
Speaker 2: coming from Kamala and the campaign. They say this, This
Speaker 2: is in fact the primary message. It's not a secondary thing.
Speaker 2: It's not like I'm seizing on something that doesn't really
Speaker 2: matter to them all that much. But Kamala Harris is
Speaker 2: really trying to tell people that Donald Trump is a Nazi.
Speaker 2: This is just mentally unwell ill. Whatever you want to
Speaker 2: say about it, it just it doesn't add up. And
Speaker 2: it worries me because what happens next, given that I
Speaker 2: think they're going to lose. How can they accept a
Speaker 2: Nazi president? And now Donald Trump's not a Nazi. But
Speaker 2: the point here is what can be done on their
Speaker 2: side to dial things down when they've already drawn such
Speaker 2: a hard line here on anything to tear down Trump
Speaker 2: is valid. Anything to tear down Trump is what should
Speaker 2: be done, including the most absurd lives. I mean, what
Speaker 2: could be worse than to call him a Nazi?
Speaker 3: Right?
Speaker 2: I mean, if they had to try. Now, Stalin was
Speaker 2: in many ways evil on the same scale in terms
Speaker 2: of loss of life life, and even greater scale.
Speaker 3: Perhaps than Hitler, depends on how you want.
Speaker 2: To gauge that loss of life. But they don't think
Speaker 2: of Stalin as evil because they're communists deep in their souls.
Speaker 2: I mean, the Democrats actually have just have brought the
Speaker 2: communist impulse within their own party, so they don't view
Speaker 2: Stalin as evil.
Speaker 3: Maybe a little misguided sometimes.
Speaker 2: My point here is they think that Trump is the
Speaker 2: worst thing you could possibly be in all history. And
Speaker 2: that is delusional. That is crazy person talk. And it's
Speaker 2: coming from Kamala herself. It's coming from the New York Times,
Speaker 2: the Washington Post. In fact, I'll get into the Washington
Speaker 2: Post the latest here on that in a second. But
Speaker 2: the fact that the closing argument of the Kamala Harris
Speaker 2: campaign is Donald Trump is Hitler.
Speaker 1: It's pathetic. It's beneath the dignity.
Speaker 2: Of the American people to even have this kind of conversation.
Speaker 2: It is one hundred percent untrue. It will not become true.
Speaker 2: Trump will not be a fascist, he will not be
Speaker 2: a Nazi. But they will just continue on with this.
Speaker 2: They are hoping to just hijack the fear in people's
Speaker 2: minds at the very last here, the last moments of
Speaker 2: this campaign, hijack the fear in their minds to do
Speaker 2: what they can to push Kamala across the finish line.
Speaker 2: It's pathetic and it's gross, but this is what we
Speaker 2: are dealing with.
Speaker 1: Our sponsor is Birch Gold Group.
Speaker 2: You know, with the massive tax hikes proposed by the
Speaker 2: vice president, an almost forty percent top income tax rate,
Speaker 2: seven percent increase the corporate tax, capital gains on unrealized gains,
Speaker 2: capital gains tax rather on unrealized gains. Coma's proposing crazy
Speaker 2: additions to the debt, the deficit, and whatever she says
Speaker 2: doesn't really matter because she's going to just run the
Speaker 2: debt into the ground even more. It's going to be crazy.
Speaker 2: Now she might lose, you say, and I think she
Speaker 2: will lose. Okay, Well, then Donald Trump will be president.
Speaker 2: I think he's going to try to turn things around.
Speaker 2: But he's still got a thirty five trillion dollar dead
Speaker 2: that can't be fixed in one presidency. So you've got
Speaker 2: to take action now to defend your savings. And that's
Speaker 2: where Birch Gold comes in. They'll assist you in, for example,
Speaker 2: converting an existing IRA or four oh one K into
Speaker 2: an IRN gold the best news. You don't pay a
Speaker 2: penny out of pocket. Just text the word buck to
Speaker 2: ninety eight ninety eight ninety eight and get a free
Speaker 2: info kit on gold. No obligation, just information on fortifying
Speaker 2: your savings before things get really crazy with inflation the dollar.
Speaker 2: Who knows where it's all going? Text bucks Who ninety
Speaker 2: eight ninety eight ninety eight. A plus rating from the
Speaker 2: Better Business Bureau. Thousands of happy customers at Birch Gold
Speaker 2: Text my name Buck to ninety eight ninety eight ninety eight.
Speaker 1: Today.
Speaker 2: Oh, I've got a news story for you haven't heard
Speaker 2: probably until you listen to this. Kamala Harris's VP choice,
Speaker 2: Tim Walls had a secret fling with the daughter of
Speaker 2: top Chinese communist official during his teaching stint in China.
Speaker 2: Wow Daily Mail break In this story, Tim Walls had
Speaker 2: a secret flling with a daughter of a high ranking
Speaker 2: Communist official during his nineteen eighty nine teaching stint in China.
Speaker 2: Jenna Wang fifty nine claims the VP Hoppool showered over
Speaker 2: gifts and seduced her at his staff accommodation at Number
Speaker 2: one High School in fo Shan, Guangdong Province. The lovers
Speaker 2: could not risk holding hands or showing affection in public
Speaker 2: because Wang's dad was a high ranking figure in the
Speaker 2: Chinese Communist Party who would disown her for fraternizing with
Speaker 2: a Westerner. But their romance blossomed behind closed doors as
Speaker 2: they sip team, made love and listened to George Michael Hits,
Speaker 2: leading the twenty four year old Wang the dream about
Speaker 2: marriage and a new life in the United States. No
Speaker 2: proposal was forthcoming from the future Minnesota governor, however, and
Speaker 2: the shame of being treated quote like a prostitute eventually
Speaker 2: left Wang feeling angry and even suicidal. Very said, Tim
Speaker 2: was very passionate and romantic. The fact we couldn't kiss
Speaker 2: her touch in public made at all the more exciting.
Speaker 1: Deeply in love.
Speaker 2: Yeah, so, Tim Walls was getting frisky with the daughter
Speaker 2: of a top Chikom official when he was over there. Look,
Speaker 2: Tim Walls is a very left wing guy. I think
Speaker 2: that he has far more sympathy and and ideological compatibility
Speaker 2: with communism then he lets on. But by the way,
Speaker 2: I don't want to do this thing where it was
Speaker 2: going to freak out. But look the guy was. You know,
Speaker 2: he's basically doing like a study of broad teaching program
Speaker 2: and you know he thought a girl was cute. I mean,
Speaker 2: it's twenty twenty four. You know there are two adults
Speaker 2: in their twenties. They want to I don't know, I
Speaker 2: mean what it is. But what I think is more interesting,
Speaker 2: or more interesting to me at least, is that I
Speaker 2: think that Walls is somebody who views what kind of
Speaker 2: the kind of can that the Chinese Communist Party has,
Speaker 2: as what the goal would be for the Democrat Party
Speaker 2: in this country. I think he wants a one party state.
Speaker 2: I think anybody who has their neighbors set up a
Speaker 2: tip line during COVID to the police come in because
Speaker 2: they have too many you know, there are too many
Speaker 2: people gathering in a private home. That's the kind of
Speaker 2: communist snitch mentality that they certainly wanted in East Germany
Speaker 2: and in the Soviet Union.
Speaker 1: Right, this is.
Speaker 2: This is something that I think all lines up. I
Speaker 2: think Tim Walls in his Heart is a comedy, and
Speaker 2: that he had a fling with a top Communist.
Speaker 1: Party officials daughter.
Speaker 2: People are going to say this is Manchurian candidate stuff.
Speaker 2: Richard Condon's book The Manchurian Candidate, where they have they
Speaker 2: call it Pavlovian conditioning. Conditioning of captured US soldiers based
Speaker 2: on what the Chinese, the China coms actually did to
Speaker 2: capture North will capture Americans by North Korean forces in particular,
Speaker 2: during the Korean War, there was massive rainwashing and there
Speaker 2: were the quote turncoats. The turncoats were Americans who were
Speaker 2: captured during the Korean War and didn't want to go back.
Speaker 2: They wanted to stay over there. Eventually a lot of
Speaker 2: them realized that was a mistake. But and then there
Speaker 2: was a whole hey are you guys traders? Very it's
Speaker 2: not really talked about very much anymore, very contentious part
Speaker 2: of our history when it came to those prisoners of
Speaker 2: war in the Korean War who became these turncoat characters. Anyway,
Speaker 2: people are going to make a big deal out of this.
Speaker 2: I don't I don't know that it really you know,
Speaker 2: I know everyone's going to make the same joke, and
Speaker 2: I tell you what the joke is everyone's gonna make
Speaker 2: right now, They're all going to make jokes. But Fang Fang,
Speaker 2: who was the Chinese spy? I mean I was on
Speaker 2: a Tucker Carlson episode and Fang Fang was being referenced.
Speaker 2: I was a guest and the Chiron was the spy
Speaker 2: who shagged me.
Speaker 1: And this is true.
Speaker 2: The little words the bottom of the screen because of
Speaker 2: Eric Swalwell's affair with the Chinese spy when he was
Speaker 2: what was he in Congress at the time, I think,
Speaker 2: I'm people are gonna draw all kinds of crazy comparison.
Speaker 2: Tim Wallas is really a non factor in the selection.
Speaker 1: The guy's at Joe.
Speaker 3: He's a clown.
Speaker 2: But I do think that he has an authoritarian, collectivist
Speaker 2: view of government. And I also think that he's a
Speaker 2: I think that he's a moral coward, and I think
Speaker 2: that he's a guy who lies a lot because he's
Speaker 2: trying to cover up for a lot. But that he
Speaker 2: thought of, you know, a pretty pretty lady in China
Speaker 2: was pretty and that they you know, got after it
Speaker 2: a little bit before he was in government. Or had
Speaker 2: any access to. He didn't have any access to any secrets.
Speaker 2: He didn't have a clearance. People are gonna probably get
Speaker 2: mad at me for thinks I don't know what's it's interesting,
Speaker 2: but yeah, so you know what I mean, you know
Speaker 2: what I mean, maybe you're a single guy, you're over there.
Speaker 3: I don't know what's the what's the what's the big deal?
Speaker 2: But everyone's gonna take different approaches on this. But the
Speaker 2: problem for me is that Tim Walls is actually a
Speaker 2: comedy in his heart from everything that I've seen, so
Speaker 2: his fondness for the daughter of a senior Chinese Communist
Speaker 2: Party official is unsurprising. Next week, Americans will vote in
Speaker 2: one of the most consequent elections in our history. Are
Speaker 2: our sponsor IFCJ wants you to know that, no matter
Speaker 2: what happens, we Americans need to support Israel. This past year,
Speaker 2: not only have we seen the war rage on of
Speaker 2: the Holy Lamb, we've seen an alarming rise in anti Semitism.
Speaker 2: This is why I'm a proud partner of the International
Speaker 2: Fellowship of Christians and Jews. They've been building bridges between
Speaker 2: Christians and Jews for over forty years, and since that time,
Speaker 2: been on the ground helping the vulnerable and providing security
Speaker 2: for Jews in both Israel and Ukraine. Thank you for
Speaker 2: your support during this critical time. Your gift helps the
Speaker 2: Fellowship provide food, necessities and security to those most in need.
Speaker 2: Standing with Israel on the Jewish people has never meant
Speaker 2: so much. Go to support IFCJ dot org to learn
Speaker 2: more and to make a gift now that SUPPORTIFCJ dot
Speaker 2: org or call the give at eighty eight four eight
Speaker 2: eight IFCJ. That's eight eight eight four eight eight IFCJ.
Speaker 2: Washington Post, Oh man, they're having they're having a tough
Speaker 2: time over there. They're getting they're getting upset about some
Speaker 2: things at the Washington Post.
Speaker 1: And it's all because Bezos said that they.
Speaker 2: Couldn't endorse in this latest election, and they are upset.
Speaker 2: They're they're very bothered by this.
Speaker 3: In the editorial room. But I just think it's funny.
Speaker 2: First of all, over two hundred Wow, I didn't even
Speaker 2: know this till I'm look at this up. So I'm
Speaker 2: talking to you. Over two hundred thousand subscribers have canceled,
Speaker 2: they have fled the Washington Post after Bezos blocks Harris endorsement.
Speaker 2: That's a lot of their subs, eight percent of the
Speaker 2: paper's paid circulation of two point five million subscribers, which
Speaker 2: includes print as well. A number of cancelations continue to
Speaker 2: grow Monday afternoon. Wow, two hundred thousand people have canceled
Speaker 2: on them. I mean that the thing the Washington Post
Speaker 2: is that it's owned by it's the Bezos Post is
Speaker 2: owned by Bezos.
Speaker 1: So boycotts don't.
Speaker 2: Really work, doesn't he doesn't care, he doesn't need it
Speaker 2: to make money.
Speaker 1: So here's a theory.
Speaker 2: And and I would note that this is this is
Speaker 2: early in the game, but others have know this as well.
Speaker 1: Jeff Bezos. I'm just gonna be honest with you, guys.
Speaker 1: I know a little bit about this because I.
Speaker 2: Live in Miami and I have a lot of friends
Speaker 2: who are in the fitness performance world. Jeff Bezos, it's
Speaker 2: taking something. It's not just chicken breast, all right. I
Speaker 2: don't know, you know what I mean, It's not just
Speaker 2: working out in chicken breast.
Speaker 1: I can't.
Speaker 2: I can't say what it is. A lot of people
Speaker 2: would say what it is. I'm not, you know, but
Speaker 2: he's taken. There's some stuff going on that's you know,
Speaker 2: giving him some, and you know, I think he's getting
Speaker 2: more conservative. I think what you see happening is with
Speaker 2: Jeff Bezos, and I think you've seen a little bit
Speaker 2: of this also.
Speaker 1: With who's the Mark Zuckerberg.
Speaker 2: You know that as they as they are growing in masculinity,
Speaker 2: they become left less left wing. And I'm not saying
Speaker 2: that Besis is a conservative, He's not. He still has
Speaker 2: many liberal thought. I'm sure he's very pro choice and
Speaker 2: there's a lot of stuff. But I think he realizes
Speaker 2: that the communists that run the Washington Post editorial page
Speaker 2: are insane and that it's no longer feasible to continue
Speaker 2: pretending that this is a news organization. It's a propaganda
Speaker 2: organization for Democrats. But the fact that they are so
Speaker 2: many of them are resigning or I don't know how
Speaker 2: many resign quite yet. A second two two's what I
Speaker 2: see two post commists.
Speaker 3: Oh, you know, that's not so many.
Speaker 2: It's pretty funny, isn't it preposterous. He's just saying we're
Speaker 2: not we're not making the endorsement this time, and they
Speaker 2: all cry and they wind, they freak out about it.
Speaker 2: But I think that Bezos, if he continues on this pathway. Look,
Speaker 2: I think if you're a guy, if you're a guy
Speaker 2: who has ample testosterone and you like to spend time
Speaker 2: with your girlfriend or wife who looks good in a bikini,
Speaker 2: I think you are not a lib you know. I
Speaker 2: think the chances are overwhelming that you maybe you're a centrist,
Speaker 2: maybe you're center right, maybe you're center left, but I
Speaker 2: don't think you'd be a leftist really with that and
Speaker 2: also be a very successful business entrepreneur and everything else.
Speaker 2: I just think that with achievement and with testosterone as
Speaker 2: a guy, the likelihood of you being a left wing
Speaker 2: goes down. And Bezos, I know, he's been very liberal
Speaker 2: this whole life, and other's been a lot, a lot
Speaker 2: you can point to and say, oh, look at this,
Speaker 2: But he he does have to operate a very large business,
Speaker 2: one of the most important businesses in the world, most profitable,
Speaker 2: you know, biggest revenue businesses in the world. And I
Speaker 2: just don't think that he can tolerate the lunatic communists
Speaker 2: that are running around the Washington Post.
Speaker 1: I think that he has to draw a.
Speaker 2: Line in the sand, and he did, and at some
Speaker 2: point this is maybe we could call this the Elon effect,
Speaker 2: which is when the richest man in the world and
Speaker 2: the most entrepreneur I mean Bezels would be upset of this,
Speaker 2: but the most important entrepreneur in the world joins all
Speaker 2: in on the Trump side of things. I think that
Speaker 2: says something. And I think a lot of other people
Speaker 2: who are very prominent, very wealthy, and very like to
Speaker 2: think highly of themselves. See hold on a second, Elon
Speaker 2: they're saying, I mean, the Democrats are saying that Trump
Speaker 2: is a Nazi and actual literal Nazi crazy stuff. Uh
Speaker 2: And Elon Musk, the richest guy in the world, most
Speaker 2: powerful guy in uh, well, most powerful entrepreneur in the world.
Speaker 2: In some ways, I think you can say he is
Speaker 2: overall he's all on board for Trump.
Speaker 1: Why is that?
Speaker 2: And it's not possible to say that they used to
Speaker 2: have this archetype that they would push the Democrats Washington
Speaker 2: Post would push of the loser Trump voter. You know
Speaker 2: all it's it's poor, you know, white trash that you know,
Speaker 2: living trailers and don't have education. And this is what
Speaker 2: the this is what the belth Way elites think of
Speaker 2: Trump voters. It really is, and that's what they've always
Speaker 2: thought of Trump voters. It's amazing, isn't Trump is a billionaire, playboy,
Speaker 2: former president, you know, entrepreneur, mogul, and yet because he
Speaker 2: understands the needs of the working class, and particularly the
Speaker 2: white working class males in this country, they say all
Speaker 2: these horrible things about him. But they also have a
Speaker 2: disdain for the people that Trump speaks for, always the
Speaker 2: so called deplorables from the era of Hillary Clinton. Right,
Speaker 2: So it's it's harder and harder to make this case though,
Speaker 2: even to their own side, Democrats to say this to
Speaker 2: their own side about Trump, because what you really see
Speaker 2: is that more and more people who are incredibly high
Speaker 2: iq and successful and important and and are doing meaningful
Speaker 2: things or like you gotta be in for Trump over
Speaker 2: over Commo.
Speaker 3: This is absurd.
Speaker 1: So Bezos is still a Democrat. I have no illusions
Speaker 1: about that.
Speaker 2: But I just think, you know, as the guy's muscles
Speaker 2: get bigger and you know, as his he's got his
Speaker 2: you know, his hot girlfriend whatever, he's less inclined to
Speaker 2: be like I guess the patriarchy and all this other stuff,
Speaker 2: you know what I mean.
Speaker 1: That's where I see.
Speaker 2: It's that's how I see this. I want to tell
Speaker 2: you where also I see the election going here in
Speaker 2: just a second in terms of some of the swing states.
Speaker 2: The latest data on that, we'll dive into it. But
Speaker 2: if you want to get better at shooting without spending
Speaker 2: money on AMO or time at the range, get yourself
Speaker 2: a mantis X system. Ninety four percent of shooters improve
Speaker 2: within twenty minutes of using the mantis X. Mannus x
Speaker 2: is an at home training system used with your own
Speaker 2: gun to dor.
Speaker 1: Dry fire practice.
Speaker 2: High tech but very easy to use gizmos gives you
Speaker 2: real time feedback on your shooting technique. Just attach it
Speaker 2: to your gun like a weapon light. Download the easy
Speaker 2: to use app file the instructions. Use it at home
Speaker 2: or at the range. Mantis X his military technology at
Speaker 2: an affordable price. Go to mantis x dot com.
Speaker 1: That's m A n.
Speaker 2: TX dot com. Now where is this election heading? I
Speaker 2: believe it Trump victory. I think fifty three Senate seats
Speaker 2: for the Republicans. Fifty three Senate seat majority is where
Speaker 2: I think we'll end up, and I think a narrow
Speaker 2: but slightly better than current majority in the House. That
Speaker 2: is how I see this election shaking out. And here's why.
Speaker 2: I mean, we could talk about all the day of
Speaker 2: the early vote everything else. But the truth is until
Speaker 2: the actual election day ballots come in, it doesn't matter.
Speaker 2: We don't know right until we know the answer, we
Speaker 2: don't actually have the answer, and we're gonna have to
Speaker 2: wait a week to figure this out. Everything about the
Speaker 2: Kamala Harris campaign is a lie, is fake, or is
Speaker 2: a misdirection. And I do believe that even though we're
Speaker 2: bombarded with this constant propaganda from whether it's on social
Speaker 2: media or in the big news networks and everything else,
Speaker 2: I do believe that one thing that the American public,
Speaker 2: by a majority, not everybody, but by a solid majority,
Speaker 2: can still see is when someone's just a big phony.
Speaker 2: And I think everything about this campaign that Kamala Harris
Speaker 2: is running is just it's just fake. And that's why
Speaker 2: it's not resonating. And this is why so many people
Speaker 2: are I believe in the swing state it's going to
Speaker 2: just say I got to cast my ballot for Trump.
Speaker 2: It is remarkable to me that we're not arguing over
Speaker 2: who's better at the things that we care about in
Speaker 2: this country anymore. In politics, I would like to think
Speaker 2: that largely the election would be about you have the
Speaker 2: Democrats of the Republicans. You have Trump, you have Kamalin.
Speaker 2: We want every we we want to have a low
Speaker 2: as low as possible tax situation with the most economic prosperity,
Speaker 2: the highest wages, the most domestic manufacturing, incredible innovation in
Speaker 2: our industries, all this, and that it's who's better at that.
Speaker 2: We want a secure border. We don't want illegals piling
Speaker 2: in millions and millions a year into this country, as
Speaker 2: we've seen under the Biden Harris administration, ten million illegals
Speaker 2: and the border's a total joke. Who's better at securing
Speaker 2: the border.
Speaker 3: But that's not what we have.
Speaker 2: Democrats don't want to They don't want to secure the border,
Speaker 2: and they don't want to do deportations. They don't want
Speaker 2: to make the people who are here illegally go back
Speaker 2: to their home country.
Speaker 1: Now, by the way, it's not oh.
Speaker 2: Let's lock them up. I'm not saying take away people's
Speaker 2: freedom who have come here illegally. The punishment fits the
Speaker 2: crime in this case, which is, look, you're not allowed
Speaker 2: to be here. You're going to go back to your
Speaker 2: home country. A lot of these own countries they come
Speaker 2: from are nice. They don't have giant welfare states like America,
Speaker 2: but they're nice places to be, you know.
Speaker 3: And honestly, it's like, at some level it's not our problem.
Speaker 2: The American people don't have to just be the souper
Speaker 2: case and the welfare ward for the rest of the world.
Speaker 2: We don't actually have to do that. But the Democrats
Speaker 2: don't view it the same way. The Democrats have a
Speaker 2: different view of things. And this is what I mean
Speaker 2: by and then you get things like climate change.
Speaker 1: I don't give I.
Speaker 2: Won't curse this podcast, but I don't give a you
Speaker 2: know what about climate It's a joke. It's absurd, it means,
Speaker 2: it means nothing, it means nothing. I don't care who's
Speaker 2: better at it because it doesn't matter. Yes it's happening,
Speaker 2: Yes climate has changed versu all. There's nothing we're gonna
Speaker 2: do about it that's going to mean anything. And it's
Speaker 2: not a big deal. But they're Democrats obsessed with it. Abortion.
Speaker 2: This is the saddest one of all. I sit around
Speaker 2: and my politics is about how do I keep people safe?
Speaker 2: How do we keep people prosperous, how do we keep
Speaker 2: people free? And Democrats overwhelmingly are obsessed with how do
Speaker 2: we kill babies in the womb for the convenience of
Speaker 2: hundreds of thousands of women a year. How do we
Speaker 2: how do we do that? And it's disgusting, it's it's
Speaker 2: just wrong. I mean, there's nothing else that I can
Speaker 2: say that will be more, I think on point than that.
Speaker 2: It is awful that this is such an obsession the
Speaker 2: Democratic Party.
Speaker 1: Notice what they do.
Speaker 2: They don't even they talk about women's reproductive freedom, women's
Speaker 2: reproductive healthcare. They don't talk about abortion. They don't really
Speaker 2: use the word. Find me one other medical procedure. If
Speaker 2: I'm getting knee surgery, do I call it, you know,
Speaker 2: you know above the ankle, below the waist, care, under
Speaker 2: the under the auspices of an orthopedic surgeon. No, I
Speaker 2: just say I'm got a knee surgery, right. Or if
Speaker 2: I'm having a if I'm having a triple bypass, I
Speaker 2: say I'm having a triple bypass.
Speaker 1: I don't say, oh, I'm having cardiac care afforded to
Speaker 1: me by a trained physician.
Speaker 3: Uh.
Speaker 2: They they always euphemize the issue. I don't know if
Speaker 2: that's really a word, but it should be. They use
Speaker 2: euphemisms when talking about it. And that's because they don't
Speaker 2: want people to know what's really going on. And then
Speaker 2: they'll say, oh, what about rape or what about the situation?
Speaker 2: And we say, okay, hold on, but the laws aren't
Speaker 2: set up for the exceptions. The laws are set up
Speaker 2: for everybody. Meaning what are most what are the vast
Speaker 2: majority of abortions all about somebody's pregnant, doesn't want to
Speaker 2: be pregnant, goes into a plant parenthood or some other clinic,
Speaker 2: and they get and they abort the baby, and that's
Speaker 2: nine percent of it. But they talk about, oh, what
Speaker 2: about this one person who had a rare medical condition,
Speaker 2: And they do all this talking around the issue, and
Speaker 2: you say, well, we could maybe create I mean there
Speaker 2: is for example, a lot of Republicans say exceptions for
Speaker 2: certainly for life of the mother, but also rape and incest.
Speaker 2: And then Republicans even talk about a heartbeat bill. They say, look,
Speaker 2: when when there's a baby's heart there, we've got to
Speaker 2: protect that as life. And Democrats say no, they want
Speaker 2: to be able to do it unrestricted any time, for
Speaker 2: any reason. And you say, well, hold on a second.
Speaker 2: In what world is this is a baby at six
Speaker 2: months not a baby? Babies at six months can survive
Speaker 2: outside the woman, but it's a little tiny human. You
Speaker 2: put it in an you know, incubator for premature babies,
Speaker 2: and I think six months again, I think I think
Speaker 2: the earliest can I think some babies can even start
Speaker 2: to survive at like five months, but I have to
Speaker 2: check outside the womb. I mean, but it might even
Speaker 2: earlier than that. So don't yell at me. I'm just
Speaker 2: saying it's very early, Okay, far earlier than actual nine months,
Speaker 2: which is closer I think to ten months in a
Speaker 2: lot of cases of gestation. So you know, this is
Speaker 2: this is what we're facing here. We're not even arguing
Speaker 2: over who's better at the important stuff. We don't agree
Speaker 2: on what's important. And that's where there's a real separation.
Speaker 3: In the country.
Speaker 1: This is where I worry.
Speaker 2: About our future, because if we care about fundamentally different things,
Speaker 2: that begins to that that that creates divides that aren't
Speaker 2: just about you know, my guy, your guy. This election's
Speaker 2: like all that election cycle. It's we're becoming a different people.
Speaker 2: We're growing apart as a nation within the nation, and
Speaker 2: that worries me. And I see a lot of that.
Speaker 2: I see more of that with the Kamala campaign than
Speaker 2: I've ever seen before. And that's why, even if we
Speaker 2: win this election, there's still so much work that needs
Speaker 2: to be done and will always need to be done
Speaker 2: to keep this country functioning the way that it should
Speaker 2: and to keep us together as a people.
Speaker 1: I mean, the.
Speaker 2: Giving up of our sovereignty with the wide open southern
Speaker 2: border is a horrible thing to do to America, and
Speaker 2: I understand that it's rooted. And this is like a
Speaker 2: lot of things. Democrats use the kindness and the goodness
Speaker 2: of people, and the left uses the kindness and the
Speaker 2: goodness of people as a weapon against them. They did
Speaker 2: this with a trans thing for example. Just use the
Speaker 2: pronouns they want. And now it's three hundred pound guys,
Speaker 2: you know, can it can do the shot put with
Speaker 2: girls teams and like, what what do you mean? They're stronger.
Speaker 2: So there's a lot of that going on. So yeah,
Speaker 2: I have to say, we are seeing that there's a
Speaker 2: different core set of values in this country that is
Speaker 2: being expressed in this election, and I think it's it's
Speaker 2: only going to get worse. So even if Trump wins,
Speaker 2: which will be amazing, and I think he will win,
Speaker 2: we've got to address this. We've got to start to
Speaker 2: agree about what the Constitution means. We've got to agree
Speaker 2: about what fundamental freedoms we're trying to preserve. Because this,
Speaker 2: to me, it's different than it was in the eighties
Speaker 2: and nineties. I mean, I was very young in the eighties,
Speaker 2: but I remember the nineties well enough to know that
Speaker 2: the kinds of arguments we're having now are about fundamental
Speaker 2: issues and differences of a difference is not just of opinion,
Speaker 2: but of foundational philosophy. And Kamala Harris and Donald Trump
Speaker 2: represent parties that see the world very differently and want
Speaker 2: very different things in this world, and that's not sustainable.
Speaker 2: So something we have to keep an eye on here,
Speaker 2: and that I think this election will continue to highlight. Look,
Speaker 2: is it possible to have a premium handgun retail for
Speaker 2: less than five hundred dollars? Well, our sponsor bar Greek
Speaker 2: Arsenal certainly think so. The Barckreek Arsenal Grizzly, for example,
Speaker 2: comes with upgrades like an R M R optic cut,
Speaker 2: improved grip texture, and metal sites like I'm pretty pretty good,
Speaker 2: pretty tight out there on the range with my Grizzly
Speaker 2: nine millimeters what I fire the Grizzly. That's my version
Speaker 2: of the Grizzly. You can get a compact too. I've
Speaker 2: got the full size. But it's a great handgun. And
Speaker 2: Barack Greek Arsenal has phenomenal rifles, pistols, upper receivers, lower receivers.
Speaker 2: If you're a gun guy or gal, go to Barkreek
Speaker 2: Garsenal dot com. You'd be like a Kidney candy store.
Speaker 2: They've got so much great stuff. And the more you
Speaker 2: see yourself like I have out of the range, the quality,
Speaker 2: the craftsmanship, the accuracy of their firearms, Barckreek Garsenal is
Speaker 2: going to be for you. The Grizzly retails for two
Speaker 2: hundred ninety five dollars right now in barkrekgarsenal dot com.
Speaker 2: That's less than three hundred dollars for an accurate, affordable handgun.
Speaker 2: Don't wait to experience your new favorite handgun. Go to
Speaker 2: Barcreekcarsenal dot com. That's Barcreekcarsenal dot com. All right, t
Speaker 2: more coming tomorrow. Shield tip