WEBVTT - TechStuff Classic: History of Electricity Part One

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from iHeartRadio. Hey there,

0:00:12.360 --> 0:00:15.920
<v Speaker 1>and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host, job and Strickland,

0:00:15.920 --> 0:00:18.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm an executive producer with iHeart Podcasts and how the

0:00:18.920 --> 0:00:21.919
<v Speaker 1>tech are you? So it is Friday, It's time for

0:00:22.000 --> 0:00:24.960
<v Speaker 1>a classic episode, which means we dive into the tech

0:00:25.000 --> 0:00:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Stuff archive and pull out an episode from our past

0:00:28.200 --> 0:00:32.040
<v Speaker 1>to listen to. This one, originally published on June twenty eighth,

0:00:32.120 --> 0:00:36.440
<v Speaker 1>twenty seventeen, is called The History of Electricity Heart one,

0:00:37.120 --> 0:00:39.880
<v Speaker 1>which kind of spoils what we're going to be talking

0:00:39.880 --> 0:00:44.760
<v Speaker 1>about in next week's classic episode, but you know, there's

0:00:44.800 --> 0:00:48.080
<v Speaker 1>no gain around it. I hope you enjoy this classic episode.

0:00:49.560 --> 0:00:54.720
<v Speaker 1>So first, let's define what electricity is, or rather, instead

0:00:54.720 --> 0:00:57.720
<v Speaker 1>of letting me define it, let's use Miriam Webster, because

0:00:57.760 --> 0:01:01.400
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of their job. Electricity is a fundamental form

0:01:01.440 --> 0:01:04.840
<v Speaker 1>of energy, observable in positive and negative forms, that occurs

0:01:04.920 --> 0:01:08.800
<v Speaker 1>naturally as in lightning, or is produced as in a generator,

0:01:09.000 --> 0:01:11.480
<v Speaker 1>and that is expressed in terms of the movement and

0:01:11.600 --> 0:01:16.319
<v Speaker 1>interaction of electrons. That's actually kind of a little simplistic.

0:01:16.560 --> 0:01:18.959
<v Speaker 1>It's talking about the move of electrons. It's really more

0:01:19.000 --> 0:01:24.280
<v Speaker 1>about the move of electric charge and not of electrons. Specifically,

0:01:24.720 --> 0:01:29.080
<v Speaker 1>if you had some other carrier that was carrying electric charge,

0:01:29.360 --> 0:01:31.679
<v Speaker 1>it would be more about the movement of that carrier.

0:01:32.440 --> 0:01:36.080
<v Speaker 1>As it turns out, electrons are the naturally occurring negatively

0:01:36.160 --> 0:01:40.800
<v Speaker 1>charged particles sub atomic particles that are concerned, especially with electronics.

0:01:41.360 --> 0:01:44.880
<v Speaker 1>So it's understandable, but I just want to point that

0:01:44.920 --> 0:01:47.280
<v Speaker 1>out that it's really more about electric charge and less

0:01:47.319 --> 0:01:52.040
<v Speaker 1>about the actual sub atomic particles. Don't worry, even though

0:01:52.040 --> 0:01:55.520
<v Speaker 1>we'll be talking a lot about electrons. I promise this

0:01:55.640 --> 0:01:59.880
<v Speaker 1>show won't be too negative. I'm seriously done with pun

0:02:00.200 --> 0:02:03.440
<v Speaker 1>for just a bit now. To further define electricity, it

0:02:03.480 --> 0:02:06.080
<v Speaker 1>helps if we get some basic ideas established. Now, keep

0:02:06.120 --> 0:02:10.160
<v Speaker 1>in mind these aspects of electricity were not understood for centuries.

0:02:10.200 --> 0:02:13.399
<v Speaker 1>So when I go into the history of electricity, remember

0:02:13.480 --> 0:02:18.240
<v Speaker 1>that for the vast majority of our experience working with

0:02:18.520 --> 0:02:22.040
<v Speaker 1>and trying to understand electricity, we did not have any

0:02:22.120 --> 0:02:28.919
<v Speaker 1>knowledge of the underpinning foundational physics. Right we were making

0:02:28.960 --> 0:02:32.679
<v Speaker 1>observations and we were even building things that could take

0:02:32.720 --> 0:02:36.480
<v Speaker 1>advantage of this stuff, but we didn't actually understand what

0:02:36.480 --> 0:02:37.959
<v Speaker 1>it was doing or how it was working, which I

0:02:38.000 --> 0:02:41.280
<v Speaker 1>always find really fascinating this idea that we can harness

0:02:41.360 --> 0:02:45.520
<v Speaker 1>something without fully understanding what it is and how it works.

0:02:46.280 --> 0:02:49.120
<v Speaker 1>But it's good for us, as in myself and you

0:02:49.160 --> 0:02:52.160
<v Speaker 1>guys the audience, to understand some of these basics before

0:02:52.240 --> 0:02:55.440
<v Speaker 1>we get too far into the discussion. Otherwise I have

0:02:55.560 --> 0:02:59.400
<v Speaker 1>to keep interrupting the history lesson for science lessons, and

0:02:59.440 --> 0:03:02.480
<v Speaker 1>then it gets kind of a little complicated. Some of

0:03:02.520 --> 0:03:04.760
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna happen anyway, but I want to get the

0:03:04.760 --> 0:03:11.960
<v Speaker 1>foundation out of the way. So the most important thing

0:03:12.000 --> 0:03:15.360
<v Speaker 1>to remember here is that we're talking electric charge, and

0:03:15.400 --> 0:03:17.720
<v Speaker 1>we want to make sure we can make sense of this.

0:03:17.840 --> 0:03:21.000
<v Speaker 1>It's time to get current on our terms. So I

0:03:21.000 --> 0:03:24.880
<v Speaker 1>guess that really wasn't the last pun I'll be talking about.

0:03:24.919 --> 0:03:28.560
<v Speaker 1>So electric charge comes in two flavors, positive and negative,

0:03:28.880 --> 0:03:31.919
<v Speaker 1>positive charge and negative charge. You're probably very familiar with this.

0:03:32.280 --> 0:03:35.560
<v Speaker 1>On the sub atomic particle level, pot you know, we

0:03:36.040 --> 0:03:39.600
<v Speaker 1>have our protons, those are positively charged. We have our electrons,

0:03:39.600 --> 0:03:43.560
<v Speaker 1>those are negatively charged. Now, opposite charges attract one another

0:03:44.280 --> 0:03:47.960
<v Speaker 1>in circuits. A carrier moves negative charges to a source

0:03:48.120 --> 0:03:52.880
<v Speaker 1>of positive charge. So some sort of sub atomic particle

0:03:53.000 --> 0:03:56.760
<v Speaker 1>needs to carry that negative charge throughout a circuit until

0:03:56.760 --> 0:03:59.160
<v Speaker 1>it can get to the source of a positive charge.

0:03:59.440 --> 0:04:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Because negative quote unquote wants to be with positive. It

0:04:04.120 --> 0:04:08.000
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really want anything, it's just that's the natural tendency,

0:04:08.160 --> 0:04:12.880
<v Speaker 1>right these for these two different charges to attract one another. Now,

0:04:13.040 --> 0:04:16.600
<v Speaker 1>in practical terms, the carrier is an electron. So that's

0:04:16.600 --> 0:04:19.280
<v Speaker 1>why we talk about electricity, it's why we talk about electronics.

0:04:20.480 --> 0:04:24.120
<v Speaker 1>It's the subatomic particle that possesses negative charge. So if

0:04:24.120 --> 0:04:28.560
<v Speaker 1>we do a basic electrostatic experiment where we take a

0:04:28.600 --> 0:04:31.440
<v Speaker 1>block of wax and we rub that block of wax

0:04:31.480 --> 0:04:34.919
<v Speaker 1>with some wool, we will build up an electrostatic charge.

0:04:35.000 --> 0:04:38.719
<v Speaker 1>So what's happening is we are imparting a negative charge

0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:43.200
<v Speaker 1>to the wax and creating a positive charge to the wool. So,

0:04:43.240 --> 0:04:46.200
<v Speaker 1>in practical terms, that means the wax has a surplus

0:04:46.240 --> 0:04:50.919
<v Speaker 1>of electrons and the wool has a deficiency of electrons. Effectively,

0:04:50.960 --> 0:04:53.440
<v Speaker 1>you are rubbing some of the electrons from the wool

0:04:53.560 --> 0:04:56.160
<v Speaker 1>onto the wax. That makes the overall charge of the

0:04:56.200 --> 0:04:58.599
<v Speaker 1>surface of the wax negative. It makes the overall charge

0:04:58.640 --> 0:05:01.640
<v Speaker 1>of the surface of the wall possi And if we

0:05:01.720 --> 0:05:05.880
<v Speaker 1>create a pathway that electrons can follow from the wax

0:05:06.400 --> 0:05:10.679
<v Speaker 1>to the woll. Then electrons will take that pathway pop

0:05:10.720 --> 0:05:14.320
<v Speaker 1>back over to the wool and sort of repair that

0:05:14.400 --> 0:05:20.000
<v Speaker 1>deficiency where that deficiency of electrons will be balanced out,

0:05:20.000 --> 0:05:23.760
<v Speaker 1>where electrons will journey back over and rejoin, and they'll

0:05:23.800 --> 0:05:26.000
<v Speaker 1>probably be a big party, you know, or at least

0:05:26.040 --> 0:05:32.080
<v Speaker 1>a sub atomic one. And that's the basics for electric charge.

0:05:32.160 --> 0:05:36.120
<v Speaker 1>So now we have to build on this foundation. There

0:05:36.160 --> 0:05:39.680
<v Speaker 1>are three other basic concepts that we need to understand,

0:05:40.160 --> 0:05:44.960
<v Speaker 1>and those are voltage, current, and resistance. Now these will

0:05:44.960 --> 0:05:48.000
<v Speaker 1>be important throughout the discussion of electricity, particularly as people

0:05:48.000 --> 0:05:51.120
<v Speaker 1>begin to get a deeper understanding of what was actually

0:05:51.200 --> 0:05:55.599
<v Speaker 1>happening with electricity. Voltage is probably the trickiest one for

0:05:55.640 --> 0:06:00.240
<v Speaker 1>people who aren't inclined toward electronics and electricity. It's all

0:06:00.240 --> 0:06:03.880
<v Speaker 1>about potential energy, specifically the potential energy represented by a

0:06:03.880 --> 0:06:08.840
<v Speaker 1>pair of different electric charges. So voltage is sort of

0:06:08.920 --> 0:06:11.800
<v Speaker 1>like pressure. You can imagine it as a force that

0:06:11.960 --> 0:06:16.200
<v Speaker 1>pushes electrons through a conductor, which is oversimplifying, but it's

0:06:16.240 --> 0:06:18.920
<v Speaker 1>helpful when you imagine it that way. So voltage is

0:06:18.960 --> 0:06:22.479
<v Speaker 1>the pressure in the system. The higher the voltage, the

0:06:22.520 --> 0:06:26.480
<v Speaker 1>greater the pressure, the stronger that push is a low

0:06:26.600 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 1>voltage has very little push, while high voltage has a

0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:32.440
<v Speaker 1>whole lot of push, and we need voltage to make

0:06:32.480 --> 0:06:36.000
<v Speaker 1>electronics work. Otherwise nothing is going to cause a current

0:06:36.040 --> 0:06:38.960
<v Speaker 1>to flow through a circuit. You can also kind of

0:06:39.000 --> 0:06:41.960
<v Speaker 1>think of it as potential energy in the form of

0:06:42.960 --> 0:06:46.520
<v Speaker 1>as an analogy of kinetic energy. So let's say that

0:06:46.560 --> 0:06:49.279
<v Speaker 1>you have a level surface upon which you've got a

0:06:49.279 --> 0:06:53.599
<v Speaker 1>two little corrals of marbles. They don't really have any

0:06:53.600 --> 0:06:56.000
<v Speaker 1>potential energy with respect to one another, they're on the

0:06:56.000 --> 0:06:58.720
<v Speaker 1>same level. But let's say you raise one of those up.

0:06:58.720 --> 0:07:00.240
<v Speaker 1>You tilt it and you raise it up, so the

0:07:00.279 --> 0:07:03.320
<v Speaker 1>corral is still holding the marbles in. But now the

0:07:03.320 --> 0:07:06.159
<v Speaker 1>marbles have potential energy because they're at a higher level

0:07:06.720 --> 0:07:09.400
<v Speaker 1>than the lower marbles. And then let's say you were

0:07:09.440 --> 0:07:12.800
<v Speaker 1>to connect a little slide between the top corral and

0:07:12.840 --> 0:07:15.880
<v Speaker 1>the bottom corral and allow the marbles to roll down

0:07:15.960 --> 0:07:19.400
<v Speaker 1>the hill. Well, this would be sort of like a

0:07:20.600 --> 0:07:25.080
<v Speaker 1>copper wire connecting an area that has a surplus of

0:07:25.120 --> 0:07:28.160
<v Speaker 1>electrons to an area that has a deficiency of electrons.

0:07:28.920 --> 0:07:33.560
<v Speaker 1>It's allowing for the movement of those electrons. Now, in

0:07:33.600 --> 0:07:37.280
<v Speaker 1>the case of voltage, we're really talking about electric potential.

0:07:37.360 --> 0:07:41.840
<v Speaker 1>Here we're not talking about kinetic energy or potential energy

0:07:41.880 --> 0:07:45.000
<v Speaker 1>that could be converted into kinetic energy. Is really just

0:07:45.040 --> 0:07:48.400
<v Speaker 1>meant as an analogy. So when we talk about voltage,

0:07:48.400 --> 0:07:51.360
<v Speaker 1>we talk about it with respect of two points on

0:07:51.440 --> 0:07:54.880
<v Speaker 1>a circuit. So a voltage difference between two points on

0:07:54.920 --> 0:07:58.520
<v Speaker 1>a single circuit and their potential difference really which we

0:07:58.600 --> 0:08:02.360
<v Speaker 1>may also call a voltage. The potential difference between two

0:08:02.400 --> 0:08:06.240
<v Speaker 1>points is measured in a unit called volts. No big

0:08:06.240 --> 0:08:08.960
<v Speaker 1>surprise there. A volt is the amount of energy needed

0:08:09.000 --> 0:08:12.520
<v Speaker 1>to force an electrical current of one ampier more on

0:08:12.560 --> 0:08:15.560
<v Speaker 1>that in a second, through a resistance of one ome

0:08:15.880 --> 0:08:19.800
<v Speaker 1>more on that in a second two at a particular temperature. Now,

0:08:19.840 --> 0:08:22.600
<v Speaker 1>you can have a voltage between two points without having

0:08:22.680 --> 0:08:25.840
<v Speaker 1>any connection between them, So you can have a voltage

0:08:25.880 --> 0:08:28.600
<v Speaker 1>between two things that do not have an active pathway

0:08:28.760 --> 0:08:33.800
<v Speaker 1>between the two. If the distance between the two points

0:08:33.960 --> 0:08:40.480
<v Speaker 1>is decreased, then that electrostatic field that the voltage difference

0:08:40.600 --> 0:08:46.079
<v Speaker 1>creates will intensify. If you increase the space between those

0:08:46.120 --> 0:08:51.640
<v Speaker 1>two points, the electrostatic field will diminish. So distance plays

0:08:51.679 --> 0:08:54.720
<v Speaker 1>a factor, not just the difference in voltage, so that

0:08:54.760 --> 0:08:59.920
<v Speaker 1>covers voltage, but now let's talk about current. So technically

0:09:00.000 --> 0:09:02.880
<v Speaker 1>the current is a flow of electrical charge, and we

0:09:02.920 --> 0:09:06.240
<v Speaker 1>commonly think of it as the movement of electrons, but

0:09:06.360 --> 0:09:09.600
<v Speaker 1>again that's an oversimplification. You can actually have a flow

0:09:09.640 --> 0:09:12.440
<v Speaker 1>of positive charge and that would still be a current.

0:09:13.040 --> 0:09:15.439
<v Speaker 1>If you add a flow of positive charge, that's technically

0:09:15.480 --> 0:09:18.679
<v Speaker 1>a current. But when we're talking about circuits and electronics,

0:09:18.720 --> 0:09:24.480
<v Speaker 1>we're really talking about electrons, not positively charged electrical charges,

0:09:25.040 --> 0:09:27.840
<v Speaker 1>So we tend to simplify it and say it's the

0:09:27.880 --> 0:09:30.360
<v Speaker 1>flow of electrons. Just keep in mind that is an

0:09:30.400 --> 0:09:36.400
<v Speaker 1>oversimplification because electrons are the charge carriers of negative charge. Now,

0:09:37.280 --> 0:09:39.280
<v Speaker 1>in a way, you could think of it as electrons

0:09:39.320 --> 0:09:42.520
<v Speaker 1>are the messengers and the electric charge they carry is

0:09:42.559 --> 0:09:46.920
<v Speaker 1>the message, and that's what's really important. But in practical terms,

0:09:47.000 --> 0:09:51.040
<v Speaker 1>we can just simplify it to electrons. We measure current

0:09:51.200 --> 0:09:54.560
<v Speaker 1>in ampiers and that gives us a sense of the

0:09:54.600 --> 0:09:59.360
<v Speaker 1>intensity or quantity of a charge. So voltage is the

0:09:59.440 --> 0:10:03.360
<v Speaker 1>force behind moving a charge, and amperage tells you how

0:10:03.440 --> 0:10:07.400
<v Speaker 1>much charge is actually moving. And this can help if

0:10:07.480 --> 0:10:10.960
<v Speaker 1>you start to imagine voltage as being a locomotive engine

0:10:11.360 --> 0:10:14.360
<v Speaker 1>and the amperage as being a series of train cars.

0:10:14.720 --> 0:10:17.520
<v Speaker 1>So a low amperage current you might think of as

0:10:17.559 --> 0:10:20.640
<v Speaker 1>just being two or three train cars being pushed by

0:10:20.679 --> 0:10:24.680
<v Speaker 1>a locomotive engine. But you might think of a high

0:10:24.720 --> 0:10:28.360
<v Speaker 1>amperage as being a series of train cars like fifteen

0:10:28.440 --> 0:10:32.200
<v Speaker 1>or twenty being pushed by that same locomotive engine. In

0:10:32.200 --> 0:10:34.800
<v Speaker 1>both cases, the locomotive engine is putting out the same

0:10:34.920 --> 0:10:39.000
<v Speaker 1>amount of force. It's just that in one case it's

0:10:39.040 --> 0:10:42.680
<v Speaker 1>pushing a relatively small number of train cars and the

0:10:42.720 --> 0:10:45.040
<v Speaker 1>other one that's pushing a larger number. But the amount

0:10:45.080 --> 0:10:47.880
<v Speaker 1>of force that's using for both is the same. So

0:10:48.760 --> 0:10:52.320
<v Speaker 1>that's the difference between current and voltage, or if you

0:10:52.360 --> 0:10:57.839
<v Speaker 1>prefer amperage and volts. Now, current will get a bit

0:10:57.920 --> 0:11:00.960
<v Speaker 1>more confusing when we start talking about the direction of flow,

0:11:01.240 --> 0:11:04.120
<v Speaker 1>and that's thanks to a certain founding father of the

0:11:04.200 --> 0:11:07.000
<v Speaker 1>United States. But I don't want to jump ahead. We'll

0:11:07.040 --> 0:11:09.320
<v Speaker 1>get there. When we get there, I'll save that for

0:11:09.360 --> 0:11:12.240
<v Speaker 1>a little bit later in this episode. Finally, we have

0:11:12.320 --> 0:11:15.360
<v Speaker 1>the concept of resistance, and as the name suggests, this

0:11:15.400 --> 0:11:18.280
<v Speaker 1>is the property of a material to resist the flow

0:11:18.440 --> 0:11:22.079
<v Speaker 1>of electric charge. A material with a very high resistance

0:11:22.280 --> 0:11:24.720
<v Speaker 1>is an insulator. It does not allow electric charge to

0:11:24.760 --> 0:11:26.920
<v Speaker 1>pass through it very easily. You would have to use

0:11:27.000 --> 0:11:29.839
<v Speaker 1>a great deal of energy to move an electric charge

0:11:29.880 --> 0:11:33.079
<v Speaker 1>through that kind of material. A material with very low

0:11:33.200 --> 0:11:36.400
<v Speaker 1>resistance is a conductor. It will allow electric charge to

0:11:36.400 --> 0:11:41.760
<v Speaker 1>flow through relatively easily. Now, even conductors have resistance. You

0:11:41.840 --> 0:11:46.400
<v Speaker 1>have to get to very low temperatures, like super frozen

0:11:46.440 --> 0:11:50.000
<v Speaker 1>temperatures almost close to absolute zero to get to super

0:11:50.040 --> 0:11:53.760
<v Speaker 1>conductivity where you have zero resistance and a conductor becomes

0:11:53.800 --> 0:11:57.760
<v Speaker 1>an ideal or perfect conductor. But at other temperatures there's

0:11:57.800 --> 0:12:00.920
<v Speaker 1>some resistance. You can get around that by making a

0:12:01.080 --> 0:12:06.360
<v Speaker 1>cable thicker. Thin cables have a higher resistance than thicker cables,

0:12:06.720 --> 0:12:10.120
<v Speaker 1>But that's kind of beyond what we're talking about here.

0:12:10.400 --> 0:12:15.160
<v Speaker 1>We measure resistance in Ohms and Ohm. George Ohm, who

0:12:15.200 --> 0:12:19.320
<v Speaker 1>is a physician who kind of figured all this stuff out,

0:12:20.280 --> 0:12:23.040
<v Speaker 1>developed Ohm's law. Now that tells us that voltage is

0:12:23.080 --> 0:12:26.800
<v Speaker 1>equal to current times resistance, or you could say current

0:12:26.920 --> 0:12:30.240
<v Speaker 1>is equal to voltage divided by resistance, or that resistance

0:12:30.280 --> 0:12:34.080
<v Speaker 1>is equal to voltage divided by current. It's this relationship

0:12:34.120 --> 0:12:40.679
<v Speaker 1>between current, resistance and voltage that is inherent in electricity

0:12:40.679 --> 0:12:45.040
<v Speaker 1>and electronics. Now, those basic concepts are the very foundation

0:12:45.440 --> 0:12:49.719
<v Speaker 1>for all electronics. Now, obviously it gets more complicated and

0:12:50.320 --> 0:12:52.880
<v Speaker 1>you can add in all sorts of different elements besides that,

0:12:53.000 --> 0:12:54.920
<v Speaker 1>with like diodes and things of that nature. But I

0:12:55.000 --> 0:12:57.960
<v Speaker 1>just wanted to get that covered as the basis for

0:12:58.240 --> 0:13:01.480
<v Speaker 1>the conversation that follows. And now we're going to dive

0:13:01.520 --> 0:13:06.679
<v Speaker 1>into a history lesson. So humans have known about electricity

0:13:06.720 --> 0:13:11.720
<v Speaker 1>in some form for millennia fales of Melitas, And I

0:13:11.800 --> 0:13:15.199
<v Speaker 1>know I'm mispronouncing that, So to all my Greek historians

0:13:15.240 --> 0:13:19.680
<v Speaker 1>out there, I deeply apologize, but I have little Latin

0:13:19.720 --> 0:13:25.240
<v Speaker 1>and less Greek. Along with my buddy Shakespeare. Anyway, he

0:13:25.320 --> 0:13:29.880
<v Speaker 1>had noted that amber, the material amber, would attract light

0:13:30.000 --> 0:13:32.840
<v Speaker 1>materials to its surface after being rubbed. So if you

0:13:32.920 --> 0:13:35.840
<v Speaker 1>rubbed amber with a cloth and then held it toward feathers,

0:13:35.880 --> 0:13:38.000
<v Speaker 1>for example, you had notice that feathers would have a

0:13:38.040 --> 0:13:42.319
<v Speaker 1>tendency to be attracted to the amber. Now, later on

0:13:42.400 --> 0:13:45.280
<v Speaker 1>we would understand that this is static electricity, this is

0:13:45.320 --> 0:13:49.440
<v Speaker 1>building an electrostatic charge using amber. But this was more

0:13:49.440 --> 0:13:52.000
<v Speaker 1>of an observation back in those times, and this is

0:13:52.120 --> 0:13:57.880
<v Speaker 1>centuries before the Common era, and in fact, the word

0:13:57.960 --> 0:14:01.480
<v Speaker 1>electricity comes from the last an electrom, which in turn

0:14:01.559 --> 0:14:05.960
<v Speaker 1>comes from the Greek electron, which means amber. So when

0:14:05.960 --> 0:14:09.720
<v Speaker 1>we talk about electrons, that means that's the Greek word

0:14:09.760 --> 0:14:13.840
<v Speaker 1>for amber. And it's because of this initial well not

0:14:13.880 --> 0:14:17.880
<v Speaker 1>even initial, but this early observation. I just thought that

0:14:17.920 --> 0:14:22.120
<v Speaker 1>was kind of interesting, and you would eventually learn that

0:14:22.920 --> 0:14:29.160
<v Speaker 1>a future engineer scientist named this whole process electricity in

0:14:29.320 --> 0:14:34.160
<v Speaker 1>honor of this early observation. Now in nineteen thirty six,

0:14:34.200 --> 0:14:36.960
<v Speaker 1>we're jumping ahead just to talk about another discovery about

0:14:37.040 --> 0:14:44.000
<v Speaker 1>ancient civilizations. There was a railroad project that ended up

0:14:44.080 --> 0:14:50.560
<v Speaker 1>excavating some ruins southeast of Baghdad, and they revealed what

0:14:50.760 --> 0:14:55.120
<v Speaker 1>we have commonly referred to as the Bagdad batteries. These

0:14:55.160 --> 0:14:58.000
<v Speaker 1>were vessels that appeared to have been designed specifically to

0:14:58.080 --> 0:15:02.800
<v Speaker 1>generate electricity. At least that's one of the hypotheses about

0:15:02.840 --> 0:15:06.800
<v Speaker 1>these these vessels. Some people disagree, but it's a very

0:15:06.800 --> 0:15:11.040
<v Speaker 1>popular one. Now you probably have heard about this in

0:15:11.080 --> 0:15:13.400
<v Speaker 1>some form of another or another. You may have even

0:15:13.480 --> 0:15:16.480
<v Speaker 1>seen the MythBusters episode where they talked about this. The

0:15:16.560 --> 0:15:19.360
<v Speaker 1>team in MythBusters talked about the possible applications for these

0:15:19.400 --> 0:15:23.160
<v Speaker 1>so called batteries, which could include a thing that you

0:15:23.200 --> 0:15:26.360
<v Speaker 1>would use in religious ceremonies, where you would have these

0:15:26.840 --> 0:15:31.200
<v Speaker 1>metal coded vessels that if you were to touch them,

0:15:31.240 --> 0:15:34.360
<v Speaker 1>you would create a circuit and you would allow electricity

0:15:34.400 --> 0:15:36.600
<v Speaker 1>to flow through you, and that would create a tingling

0:15:36.720 --> 0:15:40.280
<v Speaker 1>or numbing sensation in your hands, thus akin to some

0:15:40.360 --> 0:15:43.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of mystical experience and thus being part of a

0:15:43.320 --> 0:15:47.640
<v Speaker 1>religious experience. Or it could be that it was more

0:15:47.840 --> 0:15:54.320
<v Speaker 1>of a practical approach toward something like electroplating, and I

0:15:54.360 --> 0:15:56.080
<v Speaker 1>thought that was really cool. So let's talk about what

0:15:56.120 --> 0:15:59.720
<v Speaker 1>electroplating is, because otherwise, you know, it doesn't really mean

0:15:59.760 --> 0:16:03.160
<v Speaker 1>any thing to you. As the name implies, electro plating

0:16:03.160 --> 0:16:07.640
<v Speaker 1>involves using electricity to cover or plate one material with

0:16:07.760 --> 0:16:12.520
<v Speaker 1>another material. Typically you are plating one type of metal,

0:16:12.840 --> 0:16:15.800
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily metal, but the early version of electro plating

0:16:15.880 --> 0:16:19.440
<v Speaker 1>was metal, but one type of metal with a more

0:16:19.600 --> 0:16:23.600
<v Speaker 1>precious metal. So the reason you might do this is

0:16:23.640 --> 0:16:28.600
<v Speaker 1>to make really pretty expensive looking stuff without using too

0:16:28.680 --> 0:16:32.560
<v Speaker 1>much of the actual precious material. So you might gold

0:16:32.560 --> 0:16:35.240
<v Speaker 1>plate a copper bowl, for example, because you want the

0:16:35.240 --> 0:16:39.480
<v Speaker 1>gold bowl. Gold is more precious than copper, but you

0:16:39.480 --> 0:16:41.280
<v Speaker 1>don't want to actually have to go out and dig

0:16:41.400 --> 0:16:43.120
<v Speaker 1>as much gold as you would need to build a

0:16:43.120 --> 0:16:45.960
<v Speaker 1>gold bowl. So you want to plate the copper bowl

0:16:46.160 --> 0:16:49.840
<v Speaker 1>with gold. That way, it looks exactly the way you

0:16:49.840 --> 0:16:52.280
<v Speaker 1>want it to, but you didn't have to spend all

0:16:52.280 --> 0:16:54.600
<v Speaker 1>that time and effort getting all that gold. In other words,

0:16:54.720 --> 0:16:57.840
<v Speaker 1>we can thank the laziness and greed of human beings

0:16:57.880 --> 0:17:00.320
<v Speaker 1>for some of the early advances as as far as

0:17:00.360 --> 0:17:06.000
<v Speaker 1>electricity is concerned, So you might want to use electroplating

0:17:06.000 --> 0:17:08.920
<v Speaker 1>to do that. We also use electroplating for other purposes,

0:17:09.000 --> 0:17:13.320
<v Speaker 1>like putting rust resistant coatings onto stuff that otherwise would corrode.

0:17:14.440 --> 0:17:17.320
<v Speaker 1>You can also use it to produce alloys like bronze

0:17:17.320 --> 0:17:22.000
<v Speaker 1>and brass. But let's go back to electroplating. So let's

0:17:22.000 --> 0:17:25.200
<v Speaker 1>say these ancient people were using the so called Baghdad

0:17:25.280 --> 0:17:29.000
<v Speaker 1>batteries in order to electroplate gold onto copper. How would

0:17:29.000 --> 0:17:31.640
<v Speaker 1>you do this, Well, first, you have to make sure

0:17:31.680 --> 0:17:34.520
<v Speaker 1>that the copper is totally clean, because if it has

0:17:34.560 --> 0:17:38.479
<v Speaker 1>any schmutz on it, the gold will not properly adhere

0:17:38.560 --> 0:17:42.280
<v Speaker 1>to the copper and it'll flake off. So you typically

0:17:42.320 --> 0:17:46.679
<v Speaker 1>would clean copper this way by dipping it in a

0:17:46.720 --> 0:17:51.000
<v Speaker 1>solution that either is a really powerful alkaline solution or

0:17:51.040 --> 0:17:55.400
<v Speaker 1>a very powerful acidic solution to truly clean it. Once

0:17:55.440 --> 0:17:58.400
<v Speaker 1>you did that, you would then attach a conductor from

0:17:58.440 --> 0:18:02.919
<v Speaker 1>the battery to the copper that you're playing on electroplating.

0:18:03.200 --> 0:18:05.040
<v Speaker 1>So if it's a bowl, then you would want to

0:18:05.040 --> 0:18:09.040
<v Speaker 1>make sure that the terminal, the proper terminal from the

0:18:09.119 --> 0:18:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Bagdad battery is in contact with that copper bowl. Then

0:18:14.440 --> 0:18:17.760
<v Speaker 1>you would put that whole thing, the copper bowl with

0:18:17.960 --> 0:18:23.320
<v Speaker 1>the terminal into an electrolyte solution, which is in this

0:18:23.400 --> 0:18:27.720
<v Speaker 1>case a gold based electrolyte, so you have gold particles

0:18:27.840 --> 0:18:31.639
<v Speaker 1>within the electrolyte itself. Now, electrolytes, by the way, are

0:18:31.680 --> 0:18:36.320
<v Speaker 1>materials that dissociate into ions when dissolved in a suitable medium,

0:18:36.359 --> 0:18:39.720
<v Speaker 1>and become a conductor of electricity. So ions, of course

0:18:41.160 --> 0:18:45.240
<v Speaker 1>our variations of atoms that have a net charge on them.

0:18:45.359 --> 0:18:47.760
<v Speaker 1>They're not neutral. They have either a net negative or

0:18:47.800 --> 0:18:50.600
<v Speaker 1>a net positive charge. So when you do this, you've

0:18:50.600 --> 0:18:55.480
<v Speaker 1>got your gold ions in this electrolyte solution. You then

0:18:55.600 --> 0:18:59.440
<v Speaker 1>put the electrodes together so that not together, but within

0:18:59.480 --> 0:19:02.320
<v Speaker 1>the solution, and so that a current can pass through

0:19:03.200 --> 0:19:07.080
<v Speaker 1>the electrodes. Allow the current to go through the electrolyte

0:19:07.119 --> 0:19:11.880
<v Speaker 1>into the other terminal or the other electrode, and you've

0:19:11.880 --> 0:19:14.439
<v Speaker 1>got a negative and a positive electrode. So when the

0:19:14.440 --> 0:19:17.199
<v Speaker 1>current passes through the electrolyte, the electrolyte splits up and

0:19:17.240 --> 0:19:20.160
<v Speaker 1>some of the metal atoms contained within the electrolyte are

0:19:20.160 --> 0:19:23.400
<v Speaker 1>deposited on one of the two electrodes that you inserted

0:19:23.440 --> 0:19:26.200
<v Speaker 1>into the electrolyte. So what's really happening is the metal

0:19:26.280 --> 0:19:28.879
<v Speaker 1>atoms are ions. They hold that charge, they're attracted to

0:19:28.920 --> 0:19:32.040
<v Speaker 1>the electrode that has the opposite charge and they attach

0:19:32.119 --> 0:19:36.600
<v Speaker 1>to it. So if you have a negatively charged terminal

0:19:36.880 --> 0:19:40.920
<v Speaker 1>and you have positively charged gold ions, that opposite attract

0:19:41.240 --> 0:19:44.560
<v Speaker 1>rule still takes place, and the gold will plate onto

0:19:45.240 --> 0:19:50.920
<v Speaker 1>the copper electrode or bowl in this case, and then

0:19:51.000 --> 0:19:53.760
<v Speaker 1>you've got your gold plated copper thingam a jig, which

0:19:53.800 --> 0:19:56.560
<v Speaker 1>is kind of cool. Now, there's some who put forth

0:19:56.560 --> 0:20:00.359
<v Speaker 1>the hypothesis that perhaps ancient people's made other uses of

0:20:00.400 --> 0:20:04.199
<v Speaker 1>electricity all the way up to even powering lights in

0:20:04.320 --> 0:20:11.280
<v Speaker 1>ancient Egypt, but most scholars that I have consulted dismissed

0:20:11.320 --> 0:20:17.240
<v Speaker 1>this as unrealistic. I haven't really seen much evidence to

0:20:17.280 --> 0:20:21.800
<v Speaker 1>support this apart from some circumstantial evidence. Some supporters cite

0:20:21.840 --> 0:20:26.520
<v Speaker 1>a hieroglyphic relief that shows what to our modern eyes

0:20:26.680 --> 0:20:30.240
<v Speaker 1>appears to be an enormous light bulb. But the accepted

0:20:30.280 --> 0:20:34.520
<v Speaker 1>interpretation of that hieroglyph seems to be that it's a

0:20:34.600 --> 0:20:37.239
<v Speaker 1>lotus leaf with the figure of a snake on it,

0:20:37.680 --> 0:20:41.280
<v Speaker 1>not a huge ancient light bulb. Still, it seems that

0:20:41.320 --> 0:20:43.800
<v Speaker 1>there was at least some knowledge of the existence of electricity,

0:20:43.880 --> 0:20:46.679
<v Speaker 1>if not what it actually could do or what it was.

0:20:48.200 --> 0:20:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Now that's a trend that would last for centuries. In fact,

0:20:51.480 --> 0:20:54.880
<v Speaker 1>we were making use of electricity well before anyone really

0:20:54.960 --> 0:20:57.199
<v Speaker 1>knew what was going on with it. And again, to me,

0:20:57.359 --> 0:20:59.960
<v Speaker 1>that is one of the phenomenal things about human history

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:02.800
<v Speaker 1>is when we come across these moments where people have

0:21:02.880 --> 0:21:06.240
<v Speaker 1>figured out something or how to use something without really

0:21:06.240 --> 0:21:09.760
<v Speaker 1>fully understanding why it is, that could be dangerous. Clearly,

0:21:10.240 --> 0:21:12.600
<v Speaker 1>there were plenty of cases of that in the nineteen

0:21:12.680 --> 0:21:16.560
<v Speaker 1>fifties with radiation, where people thought that radiation didn't have

0:21:16.600 --> 0:21:21.359
<v Speaker 1>any particular harmful effects. You might have seen things about

0:21:21.400 --> 0:21:25.280
<v Speaker 1>like using X rays in shoe stores so that people

0:21:25.320 --> 0:21:27.840
<v Speaker 1>could see their feet through the shoes that they were

0:21:27.880 --> 0:21:31.399
<v Speaker 1>trying on, and then only later did we realize that

0:21:31.640 --> 0:21:34.159
<v Speaker 1>X rays are an ionizing form of radiation and that

0:21:34.240 --> 0:21:36.800
<v Speaker 1>we probably should not or definitely should not have been

0:21:36.840 --> 0:21:40.080
<v Speaker 1>doing that same sort of thing with electricity. We were

0:21:40.119 --> 0:21:42.439
<v Speaker 1>putting it to use before we ever really understood what

0:21:42.520 --> 0:21:47.040
<v Speaker 1>was going on there. But of course electricity isn't ionizing radiation,

0:21:47.160 --> 0:21:51.480
<v Speaker 1>so it does have very different effects than radiation does.

0:21:52.560 --> 0:21:55.280
<v Speaker 1>But what follows is a brief history of the developments

0:21:55.280 --> 0:21:58.719
<v Speaker 1>that unfolded as very very smart people figured out what

0:21:58.760 --> 0:22:02.080
<v Speaker 1>the heck electricity is. So in the fifteen hundreds you

0:22:02.160 --> 0:22:06.679
<v Speaker 1>had an English physician and proto scientist named William Gilbert

0:22:06.960 --> 0:22:10.280
<v Speaker 1>who began to experiment with magnets and static electricity. So

0:22:10.320 --> 0:22:14.800
<v Speaker 1>he used loadstone, which is naturally magnetic iron ore, and

0:22:14.840 --> 0:22:18.040
<v Speaker 1>he published his work in sixteen hundred under the title

0:22:18.600 --> 0:22:25.680
<v Speaker 1>d Magnetae or Magnety. It's magneto but with a knee.

0:22:26.119 --> 0:22:30.000
<v Speaker 1>He was able to describe magnetism and static electricity as

0:22:30.080 --> 0:22:33.080
<v Speaker 1>distinct phenomena, though he wasn't really sure what was actually

0:22:33.080 --> 0:22:36.200
<v Speaker 1>causing it. His hypothesis was that there was some sort

0:22:36.240 --> 0:22:40.199
<v Speaker 1>of fluid or humor, as in the various humors of

0:22:40.240 --> 0:22:44.280
<v Speaker 1>the body. There was another prevailing physical theory at the time,

0:22:44.600 --> 0:22:47.760
<v Speaker 1>and that this was the cause of attraction with static electricity,

0:22:48.040 --> 0:22:50.199
<v Speaker 1>and that if you rubbed amber, what you were actually

0:22:50.200 --> 0:22:53.359
<v Speaker 1>doing was removing some of that fluid from the amber,

0:22:53.400 --> 0:22:57.480
<v Speaker 1>which created a hole or like a vacuum around it,

0:22:57.520 --> 0:22:59.879
<v Speaker 1>and this is why light objects would become a tra

0:23:00.240 --> 0:23:04.520
<v Speaker 1>to the amber. He called it effluvium and described it

0:23:04.640 --> 0:23:10.600
<v Speaker 1>as an electric effect. In sixteen sixty, an inventor named

0:23:10.640 --> 0:23:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Auto von Geirica built a machine using a globe made

0:23:14.840 --> 0:23:17.879
<v Speaker 1>of sulfur, and if you rubbed the globe as it turned,

0:23:17.920 --> 0:23:21.320
<v Speaker 1>you could build up a charge, an electrostatic charge, causing

0:23:21.359 --> 0:23:23.840
<v Speaker 1>it to attract small light objects, such as feathers or

0:23:23.880 --> 0:23:27.400
<v Speaker 1>scraps of paper. Gherica also observed that his invention would

0:23:27.440 --> 0:23:30.640
<v Speaker 1>cause a spark if you rubbed the globe for long enough.

0:23:30.680 --> 0:23:35.159
<v Speaker 1>You could then touch something metal like a brass knob,

0:23:35.280 --> 0:23:39.800
<v Speaker 1>and see a spark fly between the electrostatically charged object

0:23:39.840 --> 0:23:45.280
<v Speaker 1>and the grounded piece of metal. Stephen Gray, another English scientist,

0:23:45.320 --> 0:23:48.440
<v Speaker 1>observed in seventeen twenty nine that some stuff doesn't conduct

0:23:48.440 --> 0:23:51.720
<v Speaker 1>electricity at all, so he thought some materials would allow

0:23:51.760 --> 0:23:56.359
<v Speaker 1>the fluid of electricity to flow through, and other materials

0:23:56.359 --> 0:24:00.200
<v Speaker 1>would hamper the flow of this fluid. Electricity would which

0:24:00.200 --> 0:24:03.200
<v Speaker 1>is sort of true when you get to electrical resistance,

0:24:03.240 --> 0:24:07.560
<v Speaker 1>only we're not talking about a fluid really. Later that century,

0:24:07.760 --> 0:24:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Dutch inventor's Pietr von Mussen book and evolved von Kleist

0:24:14.119 --> 0:24:17.159
<v Speaker 1>created what we now call the Leyden jar, and there

0:24:17.200 --> 0:24:21.280
<v Speaker 1>are actually two variations on basic Leyden jars, which store

0:24:21.440 --> 0:24:25.399
<v Speaker 1>electrostatic charges. They're essentially capacitors, So you build up an

0:24:25.440 --> 0:24:28.159
<v Speaker 1>electric static charge in this thing, and then when you

0:24:29.320 --> 0:24:35.160
<v Speaker 1>touch the the charged component, you allow that electrostatic charge

0:24:35.160 --> 0:24:40.600
<v Speaker 1>to discharge to spark, so they release all of that

0:24:41.560 --> 0:24:45.679
<v Speaker 1>charged energy in an instant. Unlike a battery, which releases

0:24:46.400 --> 0:24:51.760
<v Speaker 1>uh well, which which creates the voltage difference and allows

0:24:51.760 --> 0:24:55.399
<v Speaker 1>for electric electric current to flow over time, a capacitor

0:24:55.640 --> 0:25:00.199
<v Speaker 1>releases it in a in a moment. The There are

0:25:00.200 --> 0:25:02.280
<v Speaker 1>two basic versions of the Leaden jar, and the first

0:25:02.359 --> 0:25:07.200
<v Speaker 1>one uses a metal container inside which you have a

0:25:07.240 --> 0:25:10.879
<v Speaker 1>glass vessel nestled inside that metal container, and inside the

0:25:10.920 --> 0:25:15.800
<v Speaker 1>glass vessel you have a second metal container nestled inside that.

0:25:15.840 --> 0:25:18.360
<v Speaker 1>So it's kind of like a sandwich where the bread

0:25:18.680 --> 0:25:22.639
<v Speaker 1>is metal container and the bread and the meat inside

0:25:22.800 --> 0:25:27.199
<v Speaker 1>is glass. I don't recommend eating that sandwich, it would

0:25:27.440 --> 0:25:31.399
<v Speaker 1>not taste good and probably hurt you. But it was

0:25:31.480 --> 0:25:36.639
<v Speaker 1>that layer metal glass metal, and you would then also

0:25:36.720 --> 0:25:39.120
<v Speaker 1>have a rod of metal that would extend up from

0:25:39.119 --> 0:25:44.000
<v Speaker 1>the base of that interior lining. So imagine like a

0:25:44.160 --> 0:25:48.760
<v Speaker 1>column rising up from that internal metal cup inside the

0:25:48.760 --> 0:25:51.560
<v Speaker 1>glass vessel, which in turn is inside a larger metal vessel.

0:25:53.280 --> 0:25:56.240
<v Speaker 1>The second variation has a metal vessel filled with a

0:25:56.280 --> 0:25:59.760
<v Speaker 1>conductive fluid like water that's got a salt dissolved in it.

0:25:59.800 --> 0:26:02.760
<v Speaker 1>One or on its own will conduct electricity as long

0:26:02.760 --> 0:26:05.200
<v Speaker 1>as it has some impurities in it, but you can

0:26:05.240 --> 0:26:09.200
<v Speaker 1>make it conduct electricity more effectively by adding or doping

0:26:09.320 --> 0:26:12.000
<v Speaker 1>the water with some of those impurities, and it would

0:26:12.000 --> 0:26:13.960
<v Speaker 1>have a metal rod sticking out from the water. Now,

0:26:14.000 --> 0:26:16.440
<v Speaker 1>both versions would allow you to do essentially the same thing,

0:26:16.440 --> 0:26:18.879
<v Speaker 1>which is store up that electrostatic charge. And you do

0:26:19.000 --> 0:26:23.000
<v Speaker 1>this by building up an electric static charge in something else.

0:26:24.080 --> 0:26:26.760
<v Speaker 1>So you might take some amber, for example, and rub

0:26:26.800 --> 0:26:30.359
<v Speaker 1>the amber. Then you would bring that into contact with

0:26:30.480 --> 0:26:33.840
<v Speaker 1>that metal bar that's extending upward from the jar. That

0:26:33.880 --> 0:26:38.360
<v Speaker 1>would introduce a charge to one plate in this capacitor,

0:26:39.359 --> 0:26:43.200
<v Speaker 1>and that would create the opposite charge in the opposing plate.

0:26:44.000 --> 0:26:46.919
<v Speaker 1>In this case, that exterior metal casing. You would need

0:26:46.960 --> 0:26:49.399
<v Speaker 1>to ground the outer metal case, which you could just

0:26:49.440 --> 0:26:51.879
<v Speaker 1>do by touching it yourself, or you could run a

0:26:51.920 --> 0:26:56.680
<v Speaker 1>wire from the exterior metal case to the ground or

0:26:56.720 --> 0:26:59.400
<v Speaker 1>to a metal pipe. And when you create a pathway

0:26:59.440 --> 0:27:02.639
<v Speaker 1>between the plates by touching the charge grod, it creates

0:27:02.640 --> 0:27:05.399
<v Speaker 1>a spark as the charge is able to equalize, and

0:27:05.440 --> 0:27:08.360
<v Speaker 1>that could be a significant shock, depending on how much

0:27:08.400 --> 0:27:11.120
<v Speaker 1>you've built up inside this Leyden jar to the point

0:27:11.160 --> 0:27:15.080
<v Speaker 1>where it could really hurt or possibly do serious damage.

0:27:15.359 --> 0:27:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Both Kleist and Muschlenbrook had shocking experiences with their respective

0:27:20.720 --> 0:27:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Leyden jars, and neither was really sure exactly what was happening.

0:27:24.440 --> 0:27:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Now we've got a lot more to talk about with

0:27:26.119 --> 0:27:31.040
<v Speaker 1>the early discoveries surrounding electricity. But before we get a

0:27:31.160 --> 0:27:33.399
<v Speaker 1>charge out of all that, let's take a quick break

0:27:33.680 --> 0:27:45.840
<v Speaker 1>to thank our sponsors. All right, We're up to seventeen

0:27:46.280 --> 0:27:51.160
<v Speaker 1>fifty two, and that's when we revisit the great founding

0:27:51.240 --> 0:27:55.040
<v Speaker 1>father I had mentioned earlier, Benjamin Franklin. That's when we

0:27:55.080 --> 0:27:59.719
<v Speaker 1>got the legendary experiments that Franklin conducted. He was friends

0:27:59.720 --> 0:28:03.600
<v Speaker 1>with a scientist named Peter Collinson over in Europe, and

0:28:04.000 --> 0:28:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Collinson had sent Franklin an electricity tube. Franklin, like his predecessors,

0:28:08.760 --> 0:28:12.240
<v Speaker 1>thought electricity was a type of fluid, and he hypothesized

0:28:12.520 --> 0:28:16.480
<v Speaker 1>that lightning itself was an electric spark, very much like

0:28:16.520 --> 0:28:19.280
<v Speaker 1>the kind a leaden jar could produce if you built

0:28:19.359 --> 0:28:23.600
<v Speaker 1>up enough of an electrostatic charge, and thus charged forces

0:28:23.640 --> 0:28:28.040
<v Speaker 1>would cause a lightning strike. And he further hypothesized that

0:28:28.080 --> 0:28:31.600
<v Speaker 1>you could use a metal rod to draw lightning to

0:28:31.640 --> 0:28:36.160
<v Speaker 1>a specific location, which could end up saving structures from

0:28:36.240 --> 0:28:38.480
<v Speaker 1>being struck by lightning. So if you had a house

0:28:38.480 --> 0:28:40.280
<v Speaker 1>and it got hit by lightning back in those days,

0:28:40.800 --> 0:28:44.360
<v Speaker 1>your house would very much be damaged, possibly burned down

0:28:44.360 --> 0:28:46.480
<v Speaker 1>as a result. So he thought, well, maybe you could

0:28:46.560 --> 0:28:49.680
<v Speaker 1>draw lightning away using long metal rods. But the problem

0:28:49.760 --> 0:28:53.720
<v Speaker 1>was he couldn't build a metal rod tall enough to

0:28:54.280 --> 0:28:56.200
<v Speaker 1>dwarf the structures. He thought that he was going to

0:28:56.280 --> 0:28:59.720
<v Speaker 1>have to build something that could almost reach the skies themselves,

0:29:00.120 --> 0:29:04.280
<v Speaker 1>which made it too big of a challenge, so he

0:29:04.360 --> 0:29:09.400
<v Speaker 1>came up with this idea of using a kite instead. Meanwhile,

0:29:09.440 --> 0:29:14.560
<v Speaker 1>over in France, Thomas Francois d'alabard decided to put Franklin's

0:29:14.560 --> 0:29:17.360
<v Speaker 1>ideas to the test. He actually constructed a large metal

0:29:17.400 --> 0:29:20.720
<v Speaker 1>pole to try and conduct electricity and declared that Franklin

0:29:20.840 --> 0:29:23.840
<v Speaker 1>was absolutely right that, in fact, that metal rod does

0:29:23.960 --> 0:29:28.760
<v Speaker 1>draw lightning. But this news didn't travel back to America

0:29:28.800 --> 0:29:30.800
<v Speaker 1>that fast. I mean, it took a really long time

0:29:30.800 --> 0:29:33.959
<v Speaker 1>for information to go from one place to another, so

0:29:34.040 --> 0:29:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Franklin was unaware that his hypothesis had proven correct. So

0:29:39.720 --> 0:29:43.440
<v Speaker 1>that same year, Franklin reportedly conducted his experiment using a

0:29:43.520 --> 0:29:48.120
<v Speaker 1>silk kite with a key tied to the silk kite

0:29:48.280 --> 0:29:52.080
<v Speaker 1>down to the string, and as legend goes, he flew

0:29:52.080 --> 0:29:54.760
<v Speaker 1>the kite up during a thunderstorm until the key drew

0:29:54.880 --> 0:29:57.920
<v Speaker 1>lightning to it, and then used that key to charge

0:29:57.920 --> 0:30:01.280
<v Speaker 1>a Leyden jar. So the electric charge in the key

0:30:01.720 --> 0:30:04.440
<v Speaker 1>was then transferred to a leaden jar, which again holds

0:30:04.480 --> 0:30:09.000
<v Speaker 1>electrostatic charge. Now, I say reportedly because Franklin's writings never

0:30:09.080 --> 0:30:13.040
<v Speaker 1>outright said that that was what happened. He never specifically

0:30:13.080 --> 0:30:16.600
<v Speaker 1>said that he himself had performed the experiment. Now, he

0:30:16.640 --> 0:30:18.960
<v Speaker 1>did say that he did a simplified version of this

0:30:19.080 --> 0:30:21.880
<v Speaker 1>plan and that it happened in Philadelphia, but it's unclear

0:30:21.920 --> 0:30:24.440
<v Speaker 1>who was actually flying the kite at the time. And

0:30:24.480 --> 0:30:28.480
<v Speaker 1>according to modern scientists, if Franklin had conducted the experiment

0:30:28.600 --> 0:30:32.560
<v Speaker 1>as it has generally been reported, Franklin would have been toasted.

0:30:32.880 --> 0:30:36.640
<v Speaker 1>He would have been fried scientifically speaking, So the general

0:30:37.400 --> 0:30:42.160
<v Speaker 1>theory about this not scientific theory, but you general idea

0:30:42.160 --> 0:30:45.440
<v Speaker 1>of what actually happened was that Franklin, if he conducted

0:30:45.440 --> 0:30:48.040
<v Speaker 1>the experiment at all, was able to pick up an

0:30:48.080 --> 0:30:51.600
<v Speaker 1>electrostatic charge by flying the kite near a storm, but

0:30:51.720 --> 0:30:54.600
<v Speaker 1>that the kite was never directly struck by lightning. It

0:30:54.720 --> 0:30:58.520
<v Speaker 1>just rather picked up a charge by being lightning adjacent.

0:30:58.640 --> 0:31:01.959
<v Speaker 1>I guess, as you could say, all quibbling aside. By

0:31:02.000 --> 0:31:04.320
<v Speaker 1>this time, it became established that lightning was in fact

0:31:04.360 --> 0:31:09.160
<v Speaker 1>a really big spark. Therefore part of this concept of electricity.

0:31:09.600 --> 0:31:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Franklin made practical use out of this knowledge by inventing

0:31:12.760 --> 0:31:15.200
<v Speaker 1>the lightning rod. Now, the purpose of a lightning rod

0:31:15.240 --> 0:31:17.600
<v Speaker 1>is to attract a bolt of lightning to the rod

0:31:18.080 --> 0:31:22.120
<v Speaker 1>and then channel the electricity down to the ground. This

0:31:22.480 --> 0:31:26.120
<v Speaker 1>spares structures from being hit by lightning and thus being damaged.

0:31:26.160 --> 0:31:29.160
<v Speaker 1>So your lightning rod typically has a metal cable that

0:31:29.280 --> 0:31:32.440
<v Speaker 1>extends down from the rod and then is bury. It

0:31:32.440 --> 0:31:36.120
<v Speaker 1>has like a conductive stake as well that's buried in

0:31:36.160 --> 0:31:40.800
<v Speaker 1>the ground, and that channels the current from the lightning

0:31:40.840 --> 0:31:43.520
<v Speaker 1>down into the ground. Or really it just gives the

0:31:43.520 --> 0:31:46.600
<v Speaker 1>current a different direction to travel, honestly, but if you

0:31:46.600 --> 0:31:49.320
<v Speaker 1>look at lightning, current goes from the ground up to

0:31:49.400 --> 0:31:51.680
<v Speaker 1>the sky. It doesn't matter. The point being that he

0:31:51.720 --> 0:31:54.120
<v Speaker 1>was able to figure out a way of sparing houses

0:31:54.160 --> 0:31:59.040
<v Speaker 1>by using lightning rods. So he also established something about

0:31:59.040 --> 0:32:03.240
<v Speaker 1>electricity that folks when they're first learning about it. Franklin

0:32:03.480 --> 0:32:07.600
<v Speaker 1>established electricity is having two natures. He called it the

0:32:07.640 --> 0:32:11.600
<v Speaker 1>resinous electricity, which he viewed as a dip in the

0:32:11.720 --> 0:32:15.160
<v Speaker 1>electric fluid from the normal amount and thus negative. So

0:32:15.200 --> 0:32:18.480
<v Speaker 1>this is where the charge is flowing too. This would

0:32:18.480 --> 0:32:20.800
<v Speaker 1>be akin to that idea of a vacuum. You have

0:32:20.840 --> 0:32:24.480
<v Speaker 1>a lack of something a hole, and thus something else

0:32:24.520 --> 0:32:27.240
<v Speaker 1>goes to fill the hole. Then there was what he

0:32:27.320 --> 0:32:31.520
<v Speaker 1>called vitreous electricity, which was an excess of electric fluid

0:32:31.600 --> 0:32:35.760
<v Speaker 1>and thus a positive amount. So Franklin said, the movement

0:32:35.800 --> 0:32:40.280
<v Speaker 1>of electricity goes from positive to negative. You have an

0:32:40.360 --> 0:32:43.880
<v Speaker 1>over abundance of this electric fluid and it moves to

0:32:43.920 --> 0:32:49.280
<v Speaker 1>where you have a deficiency of electric fluid. So this

0:32:49.840 --> 0:32:54.600
<v Speaker 1>is somewhat confusing if you're looking at the scientific description

0:32:54.920 --> 0:32:58.240
<v Speaker 1>of what's happening with your basic electric circuit where you're

0:32:58.280 --> 0:33:02.400
<v Speaker 1>having negatively charged part of that is electrons go from

0:33:02.440 --> 0:33:05.360
<v Speaker 1>an area of high concentration to an area of low concentration.

0:33:07.080 --> 0:33:10.560
<v Speaker 1>It's going from negative to positive, not positives to negative.

0:33:10.560 --> 0:33:13.200
<v Speaker 1>But it's because you're looking at two different definitions of

0:33:13.200 --> 0:33:15.640
<v Speaker 1>what is positive and what is negative. That's where the

0:33:15.680 --> 0:33:20.800
<v Speaker 1>real confusion lies. So when we talk about electronics and

0:33:20.840 --> 0:33:24.040
<v Speaker 1>we talk about electron flow and we're looking at it

0:33:24.080 --> 0:33:28.640
<v Speaker 1>purely from a charge perspective, we're looking at negative particles

0:33:28.720 --> 0:33:33.240
<v Speaker 1>moving toward a positive side. But let's make it even

0:33:33.240 --> 0:33:35.920
<v Speaker 1>more confusing than that. There are really two major ways

0:33:35.960 --> 0:33:39.720
<v Speaker 1>to illustrate charge flow in circuits. One of them is

0:33:39.760 --> 0:33:43.240
<v Speaker 1>called conventional flow notation, which is the way electrical engineers

0:33:43.280 --> 0:33:48.800
<v Speaker 1>tend to describe electrical flow, and this follows Franklin's approach.

0:33:49.360 --> 0:33:53.200
<v Speaker 1>It goes from positive to negative, so electricity flows from

0:33:53.240 --> 0:33:57.640
<v Speaker 1>the positive terminal to the negative terminal. Because we're talking

0:33:57.760 --> 0:34:01.920
<v Speaker 1>about the surplus of electrons to the deficiency of electrons.

0:34:02.120 --> 0:34:04.960
<v Speaker 1>We're not talking about the electric charge, we're talking about

0:34:04.960 --> 0:34:08.360
<v Speaker 1>the number. There's more electrons over here than they're over there,

0:34:08.640 --> 0:34:11.320
<v Speaker 1>So that's why this is going to be the positive

0:34:11.400 --> 0:34:14.480
<v Speaker 1>terminal with more electrons and the negative terminal has fewer

0:34:14.480 --> 0:34:19.359
<v Speaker 1>electrons because we're talking about surplus and deficiency. But there's

0:34:19.400 --> 0:34:22.400
<v Speaker 1>also electron flow notation now that one looks at the

0:34:22.440 --> 0:34:26.480
<v Speaker 1>actual charges, not the numbers. So in that case, the

0:34:26.520 --> 0:34:29.080
<v Speaker 1>negative terminal is where the electrons are and it flows

0:34:29.120 --> 0:34:34.120
<v Speaker 1>to the positive terminal. Both illustrations can describe the exact

0:34:34.160 --> 0:34:37.640
<v Speaker 1>same circuit, but they're going to show a difference in

0:34:37.680 --> 0:34:40.359
<v Speaker 1>what is positive and negative terminals, and so it can

0:34:40.360 --> 0:34:45.040
<v Speaker 1>get really confusing. Engineers tend to use that conventional flow notation,

0:34:45.160 --> 0:34:49.040
<v Speaker 1>professional scientists tend to prefer the electron flow notation, and

0:34:49.480 --> 0:34:53.160
<v Speaker 1>thus we're all left scratching our heads. All that being said,

0:34:53.200 --> 0:34:55.960
<v Speaker 1>and an enlightened person might argue that Franklin's description is

0:34:55.960 --> 0:34:58.960
<v Speaker 1>perfectly suitable if we look at other examples of electric

0:34:59.040 --> 0:35:02.120
<v Speaker 1>charge moving across an area, Because yes, in wires we're

0:35:02.120 --> 0:35:05.919
<v Speaker 1>talking about those negatively charged electrons, but in other substances

0:35:06.160 --> 0:35:10.600
<v Speaker 1>you might talk about protons. Or positively charged ions moving

0:35:10.840 --> 0:35:13.560
<v Speaker 1>due to a difference in charge. And because you have

0:35:13.600 --> 0:35:18.359
<v Speaker 1>these positively charged ions or even subatomic particles and their

0:35:18.400 --> 0:35:23.720
<v Speaker 1>movement can also be described as electricity, It's perfectly valid.

0:35:23.760 --> 0:35:27.200
<v Speaker 1>It's just not what we see with electronic circuits. So

0:35:27.239 --> 0:35:29.520
<v Speaker 1>there's that. Still a lot of folks bemow the fact

0:35:29.560 --> 0:35:33.040
<v Speaker 1>that Franklin's decision to name things as he did was

0:35:33.239 --> 0:35:35.799
<v Speaker 1>kind of based on a whim and it made things

0:35:35.840 --> 0:35:39.120
<v Speaker 1>more complicated as we learned more later on. But honestly,

0:35:39.120 --> 0:35:41.040
<v Speaker 1>there was no way for him to know at the time.

0:35:41.400 --> 0:35:44.319
<v Speaker 1>It's not really his fault, it just kind of turned

0:35:44.360 --> 0:35:47.880
<v Speaker 1>out that way. Anyway, back to the timeline, Since we

0:35:47.920 --> 0:35:50.840
<v Speaker 1>won't learn about electrons for a couple one hundred years

0:35:50.880 --> 0:35:55.920
<v Speaker 1>after Benjamin Franklin's work with lightning, we should just go

0:35:56.000 --> 0:35:59.200
<v Speaker 1>back to what people were experimenting with and learning about.

0:35:59.280 --> 0:36:01.960
<v Speaker 1>So a few decads after Franklin's experiments, there was a

0:36:01.960 --> 0:36:06.600
<v Speaker 1>guy named Charles Augustine de Colombe who made some significant

0:36:06.800 --> 0:36:12.120
<v Speaker 1>contributions to our understanding of electricity. He published multiple papers

0:36:12.160 --> 0:36:16.040
<v Speaker 1>on the subjects of electricity and magnetism between seventeen eighty

0:36:16.080 --> 0:36:18.040
<v Speaker 1>five and seventeen ninety one, and he had done a

0:36:18.080 --> 0:36:21.719
<v Speaker 1>lot of work leading up to those publications. Among his

0:36:21.840 --> 0:36:25.920
<v Speaker 1>discoveries was the relationship between the strength of opposite charges

0:36:26.400 --> 0:36:29.640
<v Speaker 1>and that distance between them. He developed what we now

0:36:29.680 --> 0:36:33.480
<v Speaker 1>call Coulomb's law. Now, this law states the electrical or

0:36:33.520 --> 0:36:36.640
<v Speaker 1>magnetic force depends upon the strength and nature of the

0:36:36.719 --> 0:36:40.360
<v Speaker 1>charges of the two objects and the distance between those

0:36:40.400 --> 0:36:44.319
<v Speaker 1>two objects. So, if you have two similarly charged objects,

0:36:44.719 --> 0:36:48.120
<v Speaker 1>like two positives, they repel one another with a non

0:36:48.520 --> 0:36:53.600
<v Speaker 1>contact force. Two opposite charged objects, a negative and a positive,

0:36:53.640 --> 0:36:58.000
<v Speaker 1>will attract one another with a non contact force. These

0:36:58.120 --> 0:37:01.120
<v Speaker 1>forces are vector quantity, which means they have both a

0:37:01.239 --> 0:37:04.719
<v Speaker 1>magnitude and a direction, and the distance between the two

0:37:04.719 --> 0:37:08.000
<v Speaker 1>objects affects the amount of force. The closer the objects

0:37:08.040 --> 0:37:12.120
<v Speaker 1>are to one another, the greater the force is between them. Or,

0:37:12.160 --> 0:37:15.600
<v Speaker 1>in other words, that the magnitude of the electrostatic force

0:37:15.640 --> 0:37:19.680
<v Speaker 1>of attraction between two point charges is directly proportional to

0:37:19.760 --> 0:37:23.520
<v Speaker 1>the product of the magnitudes of charges and inversely proportional

0:37:23.560 --> 0:37:28.120
<v Speaker 1>to the square of the distance between them. That's the

0:37:28.120 --> 0:37:31.920
<v Speaker 1>technical description of Coulomb's law. There's also a constant that

0:37:31.960 --> 0:37:34.560
<v Speaker 1>you have to use when you're working with equations. Using

0:37:34.560 --> 0:37:37.239
<v Speaker 1>Culolm's law, but we don't need to really dive into that,

0:37:38.400 --> 0:37:42.720
<v Speaker 1>the point being that he realized that distance definitely plays

0:37:42.719 --> 0:37:45.719
<v Speaker 1>a factor with these other forces that we still didn't

0:37:45.760 --> 0:37:50.600
<v Speaker 1>fully understand at that point. Then you have Alessandro Volta,

0:37:50.880 --> 0:37:53.600
<v Speaker 1>from whom we get the word volt He was an

0:37:53.640 --> 0:37:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Italian physicist who became interested in the study of electricity.

0:37:57.080 --> 0:38:00.080
<v Speaker 1>Now we normally credit Volta with the invention of the

0:38:00.080 --> 0:38:04.319
<v Speaker 1>electric battery, those Bagdad batteries set aside. He began by

0:38:04.360 --> 0:38:08.240
<v Speaker 1>building on the work of another physicist named Johann Carl Vilk,

0:38:08.719 --> 0:38:13.280
<v Speaker 1>who had invented the electroforts. The electrofus was a simple

0:38:13.360 --> 0:38:16.560
<v Speaker 1>capacitative generator that could build up an electrostatic charge for

0:38:16.680 --> 0:38:21.000
<v Speaker 1>use and experiments. So all these scientists really wanted to

0:38:21.040 --> 0:38:23.320
<v Speaker 1>study electricity, but to do that you had to build

0:38:23.360 --> 0:38:26.319
<v Speaker 1>up these electrostatic charges so that when you discharged them,

0:38:26.320 --> 0:38:28.719
<v Speaker 1>you had something to study. So this was a guy

0:38:28.760 --> 0:38:31.359
<v Speaker 1>who had developed the electro forest as a way of

0:38:31.440 --> 0:38:38.279
<v Speaker 1>making that easier to do. Volta's buddy Luigi Galvani had

0:38:38.320 --> 0:38:41.279
<v Speaker 1>observed something really unusual himself. He noted that when he

0:38:41.400 --> 0:38:44.560
<v Speaker 1>used two different types of metal to make contact with

0:38:44.600 --> 0:38:47.839
<v Speaker 1>the muscle of a frog, an electric current would pass

0:38:47.920 --> 0:38:50.239
<v Speaker 1>between the two, and so he thought the source of

0:38:50.239 --> 0:38:52.879
<v Speaker 1>the electricity was from the frog itself, and he called

0:38:52.920 --> 0:38:56.920
<v Speaker 1>it animal electricity. Volta disagreed, saying that the frog was

0:38:57.040 --> 0:38:59.880
<v Speaker 1>just a conductor, not the generator, and so he was

0:39:00.000 --> 0:39:03.760
<v Speaker 1>call it metallic electricity. And this was a big debate

0:39:04.120 --> 0:39:07.799
<v Speaker 1>in circles at the time. So in seventeen ninety two,

0:39:07.880 --> 0:39:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Volta began to experiment on metals, often using his own

0:39:12.160 --> 0:39:15.440
<v Speaker 1>tongue as the laboratory. He would put two different discs

0:39:15.440 --> 0:39:17.480
<v Speaker 1>of metal on his tongue and feel the tingling on

0:39:17.520 --> 0:39:21.160
<v Speaker 1>his tongue and say, yep, there's an electric current passing there.

0:39:22.560 --> 0:39:24.239
<v Speaker 1>But he could also use other stuff as well, and

0:39:24.280 --> 0:39:26.600
<v Speaker 1>he was able to observe that in fact, it was

0:39:26.640 --> 0:39:31.160
<v Speaker 1>the metals that were important, not the creature. This also

0:39:31.200 --> 0:39:34.360
<v Speaker 1>inspired Volta to look into electricity further, which culminated with

0:39:34.440 --> 0:39:37.719
<v Speaker 1>the design of the first real battery as far as

0:39:37.880 --> 0:39:41.319
<v Speaker 1>modern science is concerned. It was in eighteen hundred that

0:39:41.440 --> 0:39:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Volta invented the voltaic pile, also known as the voltaic column.

0:39:47.440 --> 0:39:51.200
<v Speaker 1>This battery consisted of alternating layers of zinc and silver,

0:39:51.760 --> 0:39:55.680
<v Speaker 1>or of alternating layers of copper and pewter with layers

0:39:55.719 --> 0:39:58.880
<v Speaker 1>of paper or cloth soaked in a salt solution in

0:39:58.960 --> 0:40:02.640
<v Speaker 1>between the different metal discs. This arrangement could create a

0:40:02.680 --> 0:40:06.120
<v Speaker 1>steady electric current that didn't need recharging like a Leyden

0:40:06.200 --> 0:40:09.600
<v Speaker 1>jar did. So this was a great solution for engineers

0:40:09.600 --> 0:40:11.480
<v Speaker 1>and scientists who wanted to be able to work with

0:40:11.520 --> 0:40:14.680
<v Speaker 1>electricity but didn't want to have to stop every time

0:40:14.840 --> 0:40:18.320
<v Speaker 1>they discharged Leyden jar to build up another electrostatic charge.

0:40:18.560 --> 0:40:22.320
<v Speaker 1>This was a steady source, so it was a huge boon,

0:40:22.719 --> 0:40:25.480
<v Speaker 1>although we didn't really have any other practical applications for

0:40:25.520 --> 0:40:31.120
<v Speaker 1>electricity just yet. But six weeks after Volta published his findings,

0:40:31.640 --> 0:40:36.920
<v Speaker 1>English scientists William Nicholson and Anthony Carlisle experimented with a

0:40:37.000 --> 0:40:40.800
<v Speaker 1>voltaic pile and electrodes placed in water, and the electric

0:40:40.880 --> 0:40:43.640
<v Speaker 1>current that passed through the water caused the water to

0:40:43.719 --> 0:40:49.400
<v Speaker 1>decompose into hydrogen and oxygen, breaking the molecules of water apart.

0:40:49.920 --> 0:40:53.640
<v Speaker 1>And this is a process that we call electrolysis, specifically

0:40:53.640 --> 0:40:57.160
<v Speaker 1>with water, but with other things as well, using electrical

0:40:57.239 --> 0:41:01.000
<v Speaker 1>charges to break those molecular bonds. By eighteen oh two,

0:41:01.680 --> 0:41:06.600
<v Speaker 1>William Crookshank had designed the first electric battery for mass production,

0:41:06.760 --> 0:41:09.880
<v Speaker 1>using copper and zinc in a wooden box filled with

0:41:09.920 --> 0:41:14.040
<v Speaker 1>an electrolyte a brine and sealed to prevent leaking. So

0:41:14.080 --> 0:41:17.480
<v Speaker 1>a big think of a big wooden battery akin to

0:41:17.520 --> 0:41:20.960
<v Speaker 1>something like a car battery, would be like this today.

0:41:21.400 --> 0:41:24.520
<v Speaker 1>So Volta died in eighteen twenty seven, and it was

0:41:24.560 --> 0:41:27.200
<v Speaker 1>in eighteen eighty one that the scientific community decided to

0:41:27.280 --> 0:41:31.560
<v Speaker 1>name the unit of electromotive force the vault, after him.

0:41:32.040 --> 0:41:34.640
<v Speaker 1>So he did not live to see his name used

0:41:34.760 --> 0:41:39.600
<v Speaker 1>to describe electromotive force, but he certainly was the inspiration

0:41:39.760 --> 0:41:42.839
<v Speaker 1>for it, and other inventors and scientists would improve upon

0:41:42.960 --> 0:41:46.759
<v Speaker 1>Volta's design, including chemist John F. Daniel and later a

0:41:46.800 --> 0:41:51.280
<v Speaker 1>physician from France named Gaston Plante, who designed the first

0:41:51.320 --> 0:41:56.240
<v Speaker 1>rechargeable lead acid battery. So Plante's design is the basis

0:41:56.239 --> 0:41:58.680
<v Speaker 1>for modern lead acid batteries today, like the kind you

0:41:58.680 --> 0:42:03.160
<v Speaker 1>would find in internal combustion engine vehicles. That has its

0:42:03.239 --> 0:42:07.720
<v Speaker 1>roots back in the early early to mid nineteenth century.

0:42:07.760 --> 0:42:10.880
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of incredible. Later on you would see other

0:42:10.920 --> 0:42:13.319
<v Speaker 1>improvements with battery technology. Might as well stick with that

0:42:13.360 --> 0:42:16.840
<v Speaker 1>for right now. That would include the nickel cadmium battery,

0:42:16.880 --> 0:42:20.640
<v Speaker 1>which was first designed by Valdemar Jungner from Sweden in

0:42:20.680 --> 0:42:24.759
<v Speaker 1>eighteen ninety nine, and the nickel iron battery designed by

0:42:24.800 --> 0:42:29.319
<v Speaker 1>Thomas Edison, or at least Thomas Edison's team of engineers

0:42:29.320 --> 0:42:33.680
<v Speaker 1>and scientists. There's always a caveat whenever you say Thomas

0:42:33.840 --> 0:42:36.360
<v Speaker 1>Edison's invention, because he had a whole lot of people

0:42:36.400 --> 0:42:40.799
<v Speaker 1>working for him who were busy research and developing all

0:42:40.840 --> 0:42:44.239
<v Speaker 1>sorts of different technologies, and Edison's name gets attached to

0:42:44.280 --> 0:42:46.799
<v Speaker 1>a lot of it. Edison himself was a brilliant guy,

0:42:48.520 --> 0:42:52.120
<v Speaker 1>but he largely was brilliant in bringing people to work

0:42:52.360 --> 0:42:56.680
<v Speaker 1>on these cool ideas, sometimes contributing to him directly. Sometimes

0:42:56.680 --> 0:43:00.839
<v Speaker 1>he wasn't, but he was providing the space for that

0:43:00.960 --> 0:43:04.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of work to happen. Anyway. He helped develop the

0:43:05.000 --> 0:43:08.520
<v Speaker 1>first nickel iron battery in nineteen oh one. But I've

0:43:08.520 --> 0:43:11.680
<v Speaker 1>talked a lot about batteries, So what I'll do in

0:43:11.719 --> 0:43:15.279
<v Speaker 1>the next section is talk about other developments in electricity.

0:43:15.520 --> 0:43:17.960
<v Speaker 1>But before I jump into that, let's take another quick

0:43:17.960 --> 0:43:30.080
<v Speaker 1>break to thank our sponsor. So one of Volta's contemporaries

0:43:30.400 --> 0:43:35.880
<v Speaker 1>was Andre Marie Ampere, and we talk about amps and amperage.

0:43:36.080 --> 0:43:40.439
<v Speaker 1>It comes from ampere, so his name also serves as

0:43:40.480 --> 0:43:45.040
<v Speaker 1>a type of scientific unit, basically one describing current as

0:43:45.040 --> 0:43:48.759
<v Speaker 1>opposed to voltage. Ampierre noted in eighteen twenty that a

0:43:48.800 --> 0:43:52.120
<v Speaker 1>wire carrying an electric current was sometimes attracted to and

0:43:52.200 --> 0:43:55.480
<v Speaker 1>other times repelled by other such wires. So he was

0:43:55.520 --> 0:44:01.719
<v Speaker 1>starting to notice this magnetic attraction along current carrying wires,

0:44:02.080 --> 0:44:06.160
<v Speaker 1>and in eighteen thirty one another fellow, Michael Faraday, explored

0:44:06.200 --> 0:44:09.360
<v Speaker 1>this idea further, and he discovered that if he revolved

0:44:09.400 --> 0:44:14.279
<v Speaker 1>a copper disc inside a strong magnetic field, it would

0:44:14.360 --> 0:44:19.120
<v Speaker 1>generate an electric current inside the copper disc. Faraday and

0:44:19.160 --> 0:44:21.840
<v Speaker 1>a guy named Humphrey Davey would later build an early

0:44:22.000 --> 0:44:25.920
<v Speaker 1>electric generator using this discovery. The generator consisted of a

0:44:25.960 --> 0:44:29.160
<v Speaker 1>coil of copper that would be moved past a magnet,

0:44:29.520 --> 0:44:33.560
<v Speaker 1>and this is the very very rough basic idea for

0:44:33.640 --> 0:44:37.600
<v Speaker 1>electric generators today. Moving a conductor through a magnetic field

0:44:37.640 --> 0:44:41.680
<v Speaker 1>induces electricity to flow through the conductor. That's the simplified version. Now.

0:44:41.719 --> 0:44:47.080
<v Speaker 1>More specifically, the greatest current flows through a conductor when

0:44:47.120 --> 0:44:50.360
<v Speaker 1>the conductor is moving through the most lines of magnetic

0:44:50.400 --> 0:44:55.640
<v Speaker 1>flux at the fastest rate. So magnetic flux is a

0:44:55.680 --> 0:45:00.640
<v Speaker 1>magnetic field passing through a surface. You've probably seen illustrations

0:45:00.640 --> 0:45:04.360
<v Speaker 1>of magnetic fields. Imagine a bar magnet. It's just a

0:45:04.400 --> 0:45:07.279
<v Speaker 1>simple rectangle. You have a north pole of the bar

0:45:07.400 --> 0:45:10.279
<v Speaker 1>magnet and a south pole of the bar magnet. You

0:45:10.320 --> 0:45:14.879
<v Speaker 1>would draw lines extending outward from the north pole. These

0:45:14.920 --> 0:45:18.280
<v Speaker 1>lines would start to loop back down toward the south

0:45:18.320 --> 0:45:24.640
<v Speaker 1>pole in ever increasing but less strong magnetic lines that

0:45:24.680 --> 0:45:26.960
<v Speaker 1>go further out until you get a couple that don't

0:45:26.960 --> 0:45:29.400
<v Speaker 1>even loop back down to the south pole. They just

0:45:29.440 --> 0:45:33.960
<v Speaker 1>go outward. So lines extend out from the north pole

0:45:34.120 --> 0:45:37.600
<v Speaker 1>and go in to the south pole, and you designate

0:45:37.640 --> 0:45:40.120
<v Speaker 1>this by drawing little arrows on the lines to show

0:45:40.600 --> 0:45:47.239
<v Speaker 1>the direction of this, the vector quality of this. At

0:45:47.239 --> 0:45:49.560
<v Speaker 1>the south pole, you've got all those incoming lines, including

0:45:49.560 --> 0:45:52.520
<v Speaker 1>a couple from apparently external sources. When you look at

0:45:52.880 --> 0:45:56.440
<v Speaker 1>the illustrations of magnetic fields, so if you move a

0:45:56.440 --> 0:46:00.520
<v Speaker 1>conductor through these magnetic fields, it sort of breaks the lines.

0:46:00.520 --> 0:46:05.400
<v Speaker 1>It moves through those lines of magnetic force, and you

0:46:05.680 --> 0:46:09.160
<v Speaker 1>do it quickly, current will flow through the conductor. It

0:46:09.239 --> 0:46:13.480
<v Speaker 1>induces current to flow, and the most current will flow

0:46:13.880 --> 0:46:17.800
<v Speaker 1>when the conductor moves through the ninety degree perpendicular plane

0:46:17.880 --> 0:46:21.319
<v Speaker 1>with respect to the magnetic field. So again, if you've

0:46:21.320 --> 0:46:26.399
<v Speaker 1>got let's imagine that the conductor is a square. We've

0:46:26.440 --> 0:46:30.080
<v Speaker 1>got a square of copper. It's not solid copper, it's

0:46:30.120 --> 0:46:33.560
<v Speaker 1>just a copper wire that's been shaped in the form

0:46:33.600 --> 0:46:36.560
<v Speaker 1>of a square. It's got two prongs at the base

0:46:36.600 --> 0:46:38.840
<v Speaker 1>of it that go down to where there's a crank,

0:46:39.600 --> 0:46:41.880
<v Speaker 1>so I can turn the crank and this will rotate

0:46:41.960 --> 0:46:45.080
<v Speaker 1>the square. Right now, let's say to either side of

0:46:45.080 --> 0:46:49.080
<v Speaker 1>the square, I put two very powerful magnets. One of

0:46:49.120 --> 0:46:52.880
<v Speaker 1>them has the north pole facing into the gap, the

0:46:52.920 --> 0:46:56.160
<v Speaker 1>other one has its south pole facing into the gap.

0:46:56.520 --> 0:46:59.480
<v Speaker 1>The squares in the center in between these two magnets.

0:47:00.960 --> 0:47:04.360
<v Speaker 1>When I turn the square so that it is perpendicular

0:47:04.800 --> 0:47:09.040
<v Speaker 1>to the magnetic field extending out from these magnets, that

0:47:09.239 --> 0:47:11.640
<v Speaker 1>is the moment when it's going to have the most

0:47:11.719 --> 0:47:15.160
<v Speaker 1>current flowing through the square as it moves. It has

0:47:15.200 --> 0:47:19.040
<v Speaker 1>to be moving for this to really work. When you

0:47:19.080 --> 0:47:23.160
<v Speaker 1>get it parallel with the magnetic fields, you will have

0:47:23.440 --> 0:47:26.719
<v Speaker 1>the least amount of current. In fact, you have no

0:47:26.800 --> 0:47:30.160
<v Speaker 1>current at all flowing through it at that moment. If

0:47:30.200 --> 0:47:32.759
<v Speaker 1>you keep it turning. Then you will be able to

0:47:32.840 --> 0:47:41.560
<v Speaker 1>generate current fairly consistently. It does actually pulse, it's not steady.

0:47:42.080 --> 0:47:43.720
<v Speaker 1>If you were to measure it out, you would actually

0:47:43.719 --> 0:47:46.160
<v Speaker 1>see it pulsing. And not only does it pulse, the

0:47:46.239 --> 0:47:52.520
<v Speaker 1>direction of current will change, so it's actually alternating current.

0:47:53.480 --> 0:47:55.719
<v Speaker 1>But we'll talk about that again in a little bit

0:47:55.840 --> 0:47:58.759
<v Speaker 1>more a little bit later. To really get into alternating

0:47:58.760 --> 0:48:01.640
<v Speaker 1>current was in eighteen thirty two there was a French

0:48:01.680 --> 0:48:10.240
<v Speaker 1>inventor named Pixie PIXII Hippolyte Pixie or Hippolyta if you prefer,

0:48:11.239 --> 0:48:15.120
<v Speaker 1>But he built an electrical generator based off of Faraday's

0:48:15.160 --> 0:48:17.799
<v Speaker 1>discoveries that was very similar to what I just described.

0:48:17.840 --> 0:48:21.000
<v Speaker 1>It had these permanent magnets that had a rotating conductor

0:48:21.640 --> 0:48:24.560
<v Speaker 1>that would actually really had a spinning magnet and a

0:48:24.560 --> 0:48:28.840
<v Speaker 1>steady conductor. But same principle, right, you've got a spinning

0:48:28.880 --> 0:48:32.279
<v Speaker 1>magnet and a steady conductor. You could rearrange that as

0:48:32.280 --> 0:48:35.120
<v Speaker 1>a spinning conductor and a steady magnet, doesn't really matter.

0:48:36.560 --> 0:48:39.279
<v Speaker 1>He found that the current's direction changed each time the

0:48:39.320 --> 0:48:42.279
<v Speaker 1>north pole passed over the coil after the south pole

0:48:42.280 --> 0:48:44.360
<v Speaker 1>had passed over the coil, and this was an early

0:48:44.440 --> 0:48:48.360
<v Speaker 1>alternating current generator, but there was no real use for

0:48:48.440 --> 0:48:51.840
<v Speaker 1>alternating current at that time, so AMPI advised Pixie to

0:48:52.280 --> 0:48:55.520
<v Speaker 1>design a generator with a device known as a commutator.

0:48:56.360 --> 0:49:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Commutators are meant to change alternating current to direct current.

0:49:00.680 --> 0:49:04.360
<v Speaker 1>So the difference between alternating current and direct current is

0:49:04.440 --> 0:49:09.279
<v Speaker 1>alternating current changes the direction of the current. So you'll

0:49:09.280 --> 0:49:12.600
<v Speaker 1>have electrons flowing through a circuit in one direction and

0:49:12.640 --> 0:49:16.840
<v Speaker 1>then they will reverse and flow into the other direction

0:49:17.440 --> 0:49:23.440
<v Speaker 1>with alternating current, and they do this many times every second.

0:49:23.600 --> 0:49:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Then you have direct current where the direction of flow

0:49:27.000 --> 0:49:30.759
<v Speaker 1>is always the same. It goes from if you're doing

0:49:30.760 --> 0:49:34.000
<v Speaker 1>the conventional flow diagram, it goes from the positive terminal

0:49:34.040 --> 0:49:36.920
<v Speaker 1>to the negative terminal, and it's never going to change.

0:49:37.640 --> 0:49:40.520
<v Speaker 1>It's always going to follow that. Batteries give off direct current.

0:49:41.280 --> 0:49:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Power plants that use AC generators give off AC current,

0:49:44.280 --> 0:49:46.960
<v Speaker 1>and I'll talk more about that in part two. But

0:49:47.160 --> 0:49:50.399
<v Speaker 1>why do generators create alternating current and how do commutators work? Well,

0:49:50.520 --> 0:49:53.440
<v Speaker 1>remember that example I just gave. You've got this square

0:49:53.680 --> 0:50:00.000
<v Speaker 1>rotating conductor copper wire. It's in between the two magnets.

0:50:00.120 --> 0:50:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Say that you've got your square position between the south

0:50:03.000 --> 0:50:05.160
<v Speaker 1>pole of one magnet the north pole of the other magnet,

0:50:05.360 --> 0:50:07.640
<v Speaker 1>And at the moment you're holding the square steady between

0:50:07.680 --> 0:50:11.160
<v Speaker 1>the two magnets, and you put a piece of blue

0:50:11.160 --> 0:50:15.080
<v Speaker 1>tape on the side that's facing magnet number one, which

0:50:15.080 --> 0:50:17.520
<v Speaker 1>has the south pole facing into the gap, and you

0:50:17.560 --> 0:50:20.680
<v Speaker 1>put a piece of red tape on the side facing

0:50:20.719 --> 0:50:23.840
<v Speaker 1>magnet two, which is the north pole of the other magnet.

0:50:23.840 --> 0:50:26.800
<v Speaker 1>And then you rotate the square so that it moves

0:50:27.600 --> 0:50:31.200
<v Speaker 1>down or back with respect to magnet one, and up

0:50:31.320 --> 0:50:34.839
<v Speaker 1>or forward with respect to magnet two. So if you're

0:50:35.120 --> 0:50:37.239
<v Speaker 1>staring at this, you see that blue tape start to

0:50:37.239 --> 0:50:43.000
<v Speaker 1>move down. Let's say that we've got this horizontally aligned.

0:50:44.360 --> 0:50:47.000
<v Speaker 1>It appears to move down with respect to the magnets.

0:50:47.200 --> 0:50:49.880
<v Speaker 1>The red tape moves up with respect to the magnets,

0:50:50.320 --> 0:50:52.399
<v Speaker 1>and as it does this, it induces current to flow

0:50:52.400 --> 0:50:55.239
<v Speaker 1>in one direction in the copper wire. But once the

0:50:55.320 --> 0:50:59.680
<v Speaker 1>square hits that parallel position with the magnetic fields and

0:50:59.719 --> 0:51:03.200
<v Speaker 1>then continues its turn, the side that was going up

0:51:03.280 --> 0:51:05.640
<v Speaker 1>is now going down through a magnetic field, and the

0:51:05.680 --> 0:51:07.759
<v Speaker 1>side that was going down through a magnetic field is

0:51:07.800 --> 0:51:10.399
<v Speaker 1>now going up through a magnetic field. So the red

0:51:10.400 --> 0:51:13.479
<v Speaker 1>tape takes this turn starts moving downward. The red blue

0:51:13.520 --> 0:51:15.680
<v Speaker 1>tape is making its turn and moving upward, and at

0:51:15.680 --> 0:51:19.600
<v Speaker 1>that moment, when the conductor breaks that parallel plane, the

0:51:19.680 --> 0:51:24.080
<v Speaker 1>current reverses direction. Turning the conductor quickly will induce more

0:51:24.080 --> 0:51:27.080
<v Speaker 1>current to flow and increase the number of cycles the

0:51:27.160 --> 0:51:31.480
<v Speaker 1>current flow reverses per given unit of time. Now, as

0:51:31.520 --> 0:51:34.560
<v Speaker 1>I said, this is alternating current, but the early experiments

0:51:34.560 --> 0:51:36.960
<v Speaker 1>for the day, they really need a direct current, not

0:51:37.000 --> 0:51:39.359
<v Speaker 1>alternating current, which means you have to find a way

0:51:39.400 --> 0:51:42.080
<v Speaker 1>to make the current flow stable in a single direction,

0:51:42.440 --> 0:51:45.920
<v Speaker 1>and that's where a commutator comes in. A simple commutator

0:51:46.000 --> 0:51:49.320
<v Speaker 1>is a split ring where the two sides of the

0:51:49.400 --> 0:51:51.959
<v Speaker 1>ring are made up of a conductive material, but they're

0:51:52.040 --> 0:51:55.879
<v Speaker 1>insulated from each other with an insulating material in between them.

0:51:57.200 --> 0:52:01.399
<v Speaker 1>So imagine a ring that has one tiny sliver cut

0:52:01.400 --> 0:52:04.200
<v Speaker 1>out of the ring, so it's like two halves of

0:52:04.239 --> 0:52:07.160
<v Speaker 1>a ring, and then you have an insulator in between

0:52:07.200 --> 0:52:12.160
<v Speaker 1>the two halves. On either side of this split ring,

0:52:12.640 --> 0:52:16.360
<v Speaker 1>you have elements that we call brushes. These are just

0:52:16.719 --> 0:52:21.640
<v Speaker 1>conductive materials that are stationary contacts. They make contact with

0:52:21.840 --> 0:52:26.759
<v Speaker 1>this rotating split ring. So as the conductor turns, so

0:52:26.840 --> 0:52:29.160
<v Speaker 1>does the split ring, and while the direction of current

0:52:29.320 --> 0:52:32.439
<v Speaker 1>changes within the conductor, the nature of the split ring

0:52:32.520 --> 0:52:35.920
<v Speaker 1>makes the flow of current and the overall circuit unidirectional.

0:52:36.520 --> 0:52:39.239
<v Speaker 1>Now I realize this is really difficult to visualize without help,

0:52:39.320 --> 0:52:42.239
<v Speaker 1>so I actually recommend that you go look up videos

0:52:42.280 --> 0:52:46.040
<v Speaker 1>about DC generators to get a better idea of what

0:52:46.080 --> 0:52:49.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about, because a DC generator at its most

0:52:49.840 --> 0:52:53.959
<v Speaker 1>basic level is really an AC generator with a commutator

0:52:54.080 --> 0:52:57.040
<v Speaker 1>attached to it. The important thing to note is that

0:52:57.719 --> 0:53:01.200
<v Speaker 1>the basic generator makes altrain current and the commutator makes

0:53:01.200 --> 0:53:05.040
<v Speaker 1>it into direct current. Now, at this stage, electricity was

0:53:05.080 --> 0:53:08.799
<v Speaker 1>still something scientists and engineers would experiment with. They still

0:53:08.840 --> 0:53:12.000
<v Speaker 1>didn't have any real practical uses for electricity right now,

0:53:12.040 --> 0:53:14.879
<v Speaker 1>not on a massive scale at any rate. But over

0:53:14.920 --> 0:53:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the course of the nineteenth century it became clear that

0:53:18.080 --> 0:53:22.200
<v Speaker 1>electricity had the potential. It's another electricity pun for you

0:53:22.560 --> 0:53:26.280
<v Speaker 1>to change the world. I hope you enjoyed that classic

0:53:26.320 --> 0:53:29.600
<v Speaker 1>episode of tech Stuff from June twenty eighth, twenty seventeen.

0:53:29.719 --> 0:53:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Next week we will obviously have Part two, the conclusion

0:53:33.960 --> 0:53:36.560
<v Speaker 1>of this two part series on the history of electricity.

0:53:37.040 --> 0:53:39.319
<v Speaker 1>Until then, I hope you are all well, and I'll

0:53:39.360 --> 0:53:48.200
<v Speaker 1>talk to you again really soon. Tech Stuff is an

0:53:48.239 --> 0:53:53.760
<v Speaker 1>iHeartRadio production. For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app,

0:53:53.880 --> 0:53:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.

0:54:00.040 --> 0:54:00.080
<v Speaker 1>No